{"meta":{"query_hash":"ab22e582a956","filters":{"venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit"},"cohort_total":184,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":184,"exported":184,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ab22e582a956","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Canadian+Journal+of+Women+and+the+Law%2FRevue+Femmes+et+Droit"},"results":[{"id":"W1513301480","doi":"","title":"Dignity and the Conditions of Truth: What Equality Needs from Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Humanities; Interpretation (philosophy); Sociology; Ethnology; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.031650207202165416,"score_gpt":0.28310874639364203,"score_spread":0.2514585391914766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1513301480","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.927074,0.0028807318,0.000018850676,0.02072102,0.00050292455,0.00015133551,0.00008039873,0.0000042268152,0.04856648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947223,0.0007923241,0.000016078204,0.0034071864,0.00036066686,0.0000022171112,0.0000029406372,0.0000051118964,0.0006911902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879414,0.00036487935,0.00029190196,0.00007273928,0.00015541677,0.00032090218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801767,0.0010445195,0.00023939632,0.00012086843,0.000118744756,0.00045877518],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004154269,0.0000845509,0.00029131776,0.000013439754,0.0008764554,0.00026289152,0.00027147873,0.00010406135,0.00012359722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017788433,0.00005166668,0.00012080279,0.0001657966,0.003294482,0.00040442488,0.000017138287,0.00030141947,0.0000011116609],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043625238,0.0000058987353,0.0002827518,0.0000055239607,0.00007109958,0.0000048593342,0.18995579,8.6204665e-7,0.0000022936574,0.80919975,0.00020660475,0.00022096655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018292997,0.000027213098,0.0012985679,0.000075818134,0.00005820798,0.00001542309,0.23642926,0.0000014140021,0.000018159744,0.70046824,0.059684075,0.00009432867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03816171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18243742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14427571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014006041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023990987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99941796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1537780952","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.21.2.417","title":"<b>Rapports sociaux de sexe/genre et droit: repenser le droit</b><b><i>Dirigé par Louise Langevin</i></b> <i>(Paris: Éditions des archives contemporaines/Agence universitaire de la Francophonie, 2008)</i>","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04299957760662371,"score_gpt":0.30370979714161705,"score_spread":0.26071021953499335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1537780952","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.860885,0.009420203,0.00031745806,0.07984869,0.00054202566,0.00041858866,0.0003376771,0.000032321295,0.048198033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95642304,0.002909746,0.00036844806,0.012450521,0.0005494139,0.0000075266266,0.000021228268,0.000035121582,0.027234929],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99610484,0.0014607302,0.00062768016,0.0003236043,0.0002580526,0.0012250695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966093,0.00059675315,0.0005888015,0.0002981532,0.00025177695,0.0016552333],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027030166,0.0003470282,0.0006305919,0.00016057464,0.0015072743,0.00037030017,0.00054518314,0.00028442763,0.00019006917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002859323,0.00033871195,0.0003083544,0.00032198464,0.0043999716,0.00074854004,0.000029824543,0.0007330524,0.000010920682],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008949883,0.0001190158,0.008191655,0.00008659622,0.00027714088,0.001096563,0.51212436,0.00029651355,0.00007394198,0.44614744,0.030101595,0.0013956955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037784078,0.00031520607,0.045808855,0.00087299367,0.000296183,0.0017720173,0.27911383,0.0001959473,0.000104434,0.43648088,0.23025689,0.0010043648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.066526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1623558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23301052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018736459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00708987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1572565470","doi":"","title":"Symes v. Canada","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Shadow (psychology); Political science; Work (physics); Constitutional right; Inequality; Law; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.018840764064398614,"score_gpt":0.23528344492949993,"score_spread":0.21644268086510132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1572565470","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6737204,0.043220956,0.0000025813754,0.21754839,0.0027102714,0.0002000436,0.00007487167,0.000004586289,0.06251791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94453156,0.000738603,0.000032850876,0.0027285996,0.0014245549,0.0000053005324,0.0000014488206,0.000014989825,0.050522115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977523,0.00039283003,0.00048223816,0.00015311148,0.0002778323,0.00094165164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99800795,0.00039864323,0.00036401188,0.00011706501,0.00021885817,0.0008934593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013620947,0.00021512482,0.000542403,0.00004255844,0.0011625999,0.00024065882,0.00041204138,0.00011612489,0.00033671712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019288251,0.0001596488,0.0001432094,0.00025067563,0.0019159786,0.00029097754,0.000029001747,0.00044891975,0.0000086944765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022039849,0.000011421079,0.0027199325,0.0000477031,0.00019759516,0.0002590887,0.04644221,0.00006767488,0.0000011787304,0.9186506,0.029779652,0.0018008546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010781855,0.00005293262,0.006386666,0.00015779975,0.00007879302,0.00013075933,0.02613825,0.000014466064,0.0000045203724,0.06356602,0.9021257,0.00026586498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9941516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99921817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8723461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028955159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023773622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89418966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1596745203","doi":"","title":"Poverty: Rights, Social Citizenship, and Legal Activism (review)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Humanities; Social activism; Poverty; Sociology; Ethnology; Political science; Art; Law","score_opus":0.03650307164823102,"score_gpt":0.27295225635577847,"score_spread":0.23644918470754744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1596745203","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8049453,0.021378035,0.000002751938,0.105808325,0.0004148304,0.0003242284,0.000023755114,0.0000129769605,0.067089796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827885,0.0064165406,0.000022194497,0.005351557,0.00056949904,0.0000072186094,7.713207e-7,0.00000916896,0.00483454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853104,0.0003278395,0.00027712993,0.00012925713,0.00021295849,0.000521757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987639,0.0002144798,0.00022136628,0.00006718493,0.0001358647,0.0005971821],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012102172,0.00014442453,0.00047675546,0.000042670155,0.0021173418,0.0001030683,0.0002323774,0.000081110804,0.00011912739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023251171,0.00009655559,0.00012035883,0.00013368989,0.0014542651,0.00025075438,0.000026250558,0.00035413788,0.0000048008546],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006835639,0.000013694881,0.0010857023,0.000102555656,0.0003599206,0.00040931322,0.16781992,4.4208696e-7,0.000004772401,0.7762792,0.051847257,0.002008831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002417946,0.00010327483,0.012409603,0.0003382712,0.0001167949,0.00061074714,0.012801169,0.0000026434673,0.000005997455,0.07770735,0.89304596,0.000440267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030880166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07906755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8411987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047023315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003400897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99918175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599220707","doi":"","title":"Réflexions concernant le Renvoi relatif à la Loi sur l'assurance-emploi","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Population; Law; Tribunal; Humanities; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy; Demography","score_opus":0.030748161127069164,"score_gpt":0.275211807417966,"score_spread":0.24446364629089687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1599220707","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60295033,0.02939527,0.00018834093,0.24914195,0.0040039173,0.00025552438,0.00007954409,0.000009942893,0.11397521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9567418,0.0050490024,0.00008280665,0.0025117777,0.0011604943,0.0000031390628,6.3628875e-7,0.00002007869,0.03443023],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99714124,0.00046072723,0.00063231384,0.00023287818,0.00037674222,0.0011561246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961716,0.001238539,0.00071763207,0.00019011369,0.00020493334,0.0014771603],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006685475,0.00021212007,0.000537781,0.000114180286,0.001078934,0.0002443247,0.0006839261,0.00023071599,0.00020905765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000626989,0.00017616428,0.00023092557,0.0008701749,0.0037882978,0.00067990157,0.00003174753,0.0006421416,0.000021005919],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058543777,0.000021656086,0.0029232115,0.000020770236,0.00007808375,0.00024171364,0.07750633,0.0000394645,0.0000024889823,0.90233636,0.011568276,0.0052030827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013357796,0.00010883587,0.009770973,0.00030327283,0.000037807407,0.00017784208,0.018382197,0.000018695484,0.000006754072,0.20340753,0.7662025,0.00024777622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41896448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.841279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75463426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007338429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039390703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1883598107","doi":"","title":"Sexual Assault in Canada: Law, Legal Practice and Women's Activism ed. by Elizabeth A. Sheehy (review)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Criminology; Law; Political science; Sexual violence; Sociology; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Poison control; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.02753803651864543,"score_gpt":0.28854976556876105,"score_spread":0.2610117290501156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1883598107","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70623285,0.06550006,0.00003018647,0.1398846,0.0012974833,0.0006666087,0.00009145424,0.00001595245,0.086280815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.976933,0.0054034493,0.00003372153,0.015456454,0.00022213465,0.00001861944,0.0000025693105,0.0000151025815,0.0019149758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979692,0.00054472615,0.0003686105,0.00016150453,0.00035687402,0.0005990789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977571,0.00047044893,0.00029530915,0.00010768591,0.0003125406,0.001056965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003908968,0.00015161355,0.00047623602,0.00006440153,0.00036666158,0.00014466446,0.00023752438,0.000069168855,0.00004523506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009849239,0.000121545185,0.000021982894,0.00024633133,0.00044137973,0.00060353026,0.000028875735,0.00041152298,0.0000018296082],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041975657,0.00009415855,0.0076369317,0.000222354,0.0006028182,0.00055761344,0.3047139,0.00007567228,0.000004438303,0.36891687,0.3070975,0.009657991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013580223,0.0000965472,0.00022207649,0.00008884152,0.000028944727,0.00007500406,0.12924466,0.000013700865,8.805161e-7,0.002203073,0.8664867,0.0001815406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91880524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9864166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55938923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018837083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004109515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7290103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963657152","doi":"10.1353/jwl.2006.0004","title":"Section 28 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms : A Purposive Interpretation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Interpretation (philosophy); Charter; Jurisprudence; Intersectionality; Sociology; Human rights; Law; Political science; Gender studies; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01426809576238141,"score_gpt":0.24288582967832187,"score_spread":0.22861773391594045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1963657152","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9646172,0.00069670816,0.000003354006,0.02233044,0.00031783932,0.00028061023,0.00001913825,0.0000016092622,0.0117331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99853206,0.00004898647,0.00002143812,0.00044780094,0.00023362049,0.000006667197,3.1867265e-7,0.000003966764,0.0007051484],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990957,0.00018526275,0.00024704795,0.00007065252,0.00014807981,0.00025327172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897903,0.00010703919,0.00026169396,0.00006841988,0.0002381898,0.00034565164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090351555,0.00007706248,0.00022804529,0.00006515546,0.0006149667,0.0000648747,0.00017934336,0.000065062006,0.00004555316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001594118,0.000046147907,0.00007125501,0.000117838164,0.0009837539,0.00020818805,0.000011750779,0.0001799258,6.468491e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059432048,0.000009924204,0.004541473,0.000030279654,0.0002263311,0.000006445767,0.78515863,0.00004013606,0.00004782256,0.20578007,0.0010082222,0.0030912387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0066586765,0.00061546825,0.14750905,0.0011607659,0.00041403677,0.00023599547,0.14512199,0.0005509277,0.00054068107,0.19504209,0.50126696,0.0008833363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7293439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99341625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64003664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00074965303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040332176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47298884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964392752","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.22.2.505","title":"Marital Rape in Ghana: Legal Options for Achieving State Accountability","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Political science; Ethnology; Criminology; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.0253011249527358,"score_gpt":0.2932721723505293,"score_spread":0.26797104739779354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964392752","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9583176,0.0022537094,0.00007854553,0.013044514,0.0028329066,0.00037061825,0.00015946267,0.0000038814464,0.022938771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994602,0.00027459348,0.00033336613,0.0011081488,0.0005272056,0.000019143588,0.000002223998,0.000016096319,0.0031172177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980388,0.0002717062,0.000511576,0.00018619269,0.00013608532,0.0008556391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99823403,0.0004587819,0.00023973652,0.00017469552,0.00018643579,0.0007063259],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049017356,0.00016931322,0.00042151328,0.00013498223,0.00060437236,0.00036921835,0.00045059095,0.00014122913,0.00019999164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027766443,0.00014924828,0.0001632689,0.00026298827,0.001669863,0.00072767294,0.000028573842,0.00080462644,0.000007875714],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010693427,0.000036078458,0.00440844,0.000069487076,0.000054977598,0.000041007945,0.044481456,0.00003331653,0.000018972352,0.94497645,0.00022364556,0.005549205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0067743747,0.0005430488,0.06305815,0.0007233665,0.00017968102,0.0005372296,0.07992391,0.0013429802,0.000024230165,0.49281886,0.35300872,0.001065439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.061729852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44757116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45215762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048411213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012644911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94451815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973171136","doi":"10.1353/jwl.2006.0013","title":"When \"Feminist Beliefs\" Became Credible as \"Political Opinions\": Returning to a Key Moment in Canadian Refugee Law","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Persecution; Refugee; Politics; Feminism; Law; Political science; State (computer science); Refugee law; Gender studies; Sociology; Criminology","score_opus":0.030506856629643322,"score_gpt":0.2866128359087433,"score_spread":0.2561059792791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973171136","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35150152,0.006768063,0.0000048351308,0.41511345,0.0016036659,0.00042713078,0.0001871477,0.000007784095,0.22438642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95615804,0.00018612784,0.00013558115,0.027558476,0.0017726495,0.000021428159,0.000006509082,0.000033432156,0.0141277565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956265,0.00053411664,0.00078547,0.00033756887,0.00035249363,0.0023638292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928122,0.00025098404,0.0002234275,0.0003045169,0.00016136523,0.0062474697],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034179133,0.00030998883,0.0006683689,0.00037582061,0.0009110401,0.0005136069,0.0007866582,0.00028196778,0.0008588832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027125105,0.00030113405,0.00018096666,0.00041708257,0.0012719436,0.00034789616,0.000054995624,0.00091136765,0.00009635702],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032604792,0.000023092914,0.00096758455,0.000030601303,0.00006899148,0.00022111744,0.19572695,0.000022845305,7.045234e-7,0.8000152,0.002090974,0.0007993162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011273476,0.00023524999,0.00047029066,0.0003455589,0.000034478566,0.0003381461,0.026913822,0.000034631823,0.0000050853296,0.12500052,0.84518266,0.00031219338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9100061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9942775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8430917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004277411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051665744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973840944","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.24.1.053","title":"Le degré de déqualification professionnelle et son effet sur les revenus d'emploi des femmes immigrantes membres d'une minorité visible du Québec","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Labor market dynamics and wage inequality","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Census; Job market; Human capital; Position (finance); Order (exchange); Sociology; Demographic economics; Political science; Economic growth; Business; Economics; Demography; Population; Law; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.03446745633205539,"score_gpt":0.2280285204328412,"score_spread":0.1935610641007858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973840944","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9705487,0.0091984,0.00034749822,0.017085787,0.00026372343,0.00015657148,0.00012740456,0.000008291668,0.0022636359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970612,0.0006504916,0.00019798544,0.00088189304,0.00020913173,0.000019706005,0.0000085797,0.000032182103,0.0009388423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983097,0.00022193251,0.00067432737,0.00017349645,0.000043674787,0.0005768877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819356,0.00038855933,0.0005771946,0.00024748026,0.000107323,0.00048589575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004701535,0.00018022208,0.00052909186,0.00017846796,0.0003936077,0.00015867161,0.00032154765,0.00010774679,0.00006704685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052347675,0.00015683261,0.00014206879,0.00019998153,0.000269526,0.00044337066,0.00003258784,0.0002926411,0.0000090092035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008042464,0.00006713619,0.22808814,0.00011970903,0.00010368133,0.000010519686,0.018509222,0.000016257098,0.000022505788,0.7515415,0.00034234798,0.0010985757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032818872,0.00016655799,0.43028936,0.00029840303,0.00004448352,0.00022568123,0.0070898957,0.0003495887,0.00010140046,0.5212932,0.03626978,0.0005897377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38379818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.432154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23024824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003576185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005257095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63954484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977077970","doi":"10.1353/jwl.2006.0017","title":"Granovsky v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration) : Adding Insult to Injury?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insult; Immigration; Political science; Law; Demographic economics; Economics","score_opus":0.01984727827338229,"score_gpt":0.26385912846239407,"score_spread":0.24401185018901178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977077970","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9334692,0.00064233807,0.0000022685224,0.06115808,0.00017132662,0.00016794565,0.000033899443,0.0000022095787,0.0043527335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950822,0.00012918096,0.000097267584,0.0027423357,0.00021763517,0.0000070332776,5.947174e-7,0.0000062009813,0.0017175651],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989556,0.00011644083,0.00031024576,0.00009352096,0.00018035987,0.00034380058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988817,0.00014139165,0.00017399601,0.0000675962,0.00015216297,0.0005831335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008043067,0.00009861172,0.00028175162,0.00005002825,0.0005191397,0.00009125661,0.00017462746,0.00003814672,0.000051352934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018238826,0.00007115082,0.000041623458,0.00013105864,0.00035316797,0.0001749087,0.000023022496,0.0001363958,0.0000010097579],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001736983,0.000022666227,0.0117134275,0.000043450218,0.00031426296,0.00003718694,0.62660587,0.000039848976,0.000064282474,0.3311498,0.008733028,0.02110248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011190736,0.00014935831,0.013486799,0.00012661798,0.000040192015,0.000021984226,0.056752693,0.0000064741203,0.00007834929,0.0026061158,0.92536724,0.0002451114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7939655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9942108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9166342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007972037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006474861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39928553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977463325","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.25.2.315","title":"Assisted Human Reproduction in Common Law Canada after the Supreme Court of Canada Reference: Moving beyond Regulation by Colleges of Physicians and Surgeons","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Reproduction; Legislation; Law; Supreme court; Commission; Legislature; Common law; Human reproduction; Political science; Human fertility; Sociology; Medicine; Fertility; Population; Politics; Biology","score_opus":0.016614876357348627,"score_gpt":0.23437218755622274,"score_spread":0.21775731119887412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977463325","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9656454,0.0011161831,4.4190358e-7,0.031415243,0.00009847962,0.00030841393,0.00004602478,0.0000021399242,0.0013677155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987046,0.000054439777,0.00001008777,0.0006682729,0.000037105267,0.000014882325,0.000006633253,0.000009262567,0.0004946944],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988484,0.00010862433,0.00046283047,0.00014770705,0.00015525472,0.0002771942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988468,0.0001158627,0.0003610798,0.00029657828,0.00022272694,0.00015690947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007968071,0.000102061036,0.00044753225,0.000076982156,0.00014727733,0.00001666558,0.00010034502,0.000052862684,0.000018176752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011105068,0.00007026393,0.000023463354,0.00016648122,0.0004290416,0.000084678184,0.000014871073,0.00028725585,2.8190954e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021464978,0.00023196389,0.5374752,0.0020604057,0.0010535342,0.00031900182,0.022655899,0.00014857083,0.008972676,0.33370134,0.07218751,0.01904736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023986378,0.00035078832,0.93059695,0.0005850239,0.00008440377,0.0004311571,0.01002356,0.000042371834,0.0024025561,0.038997103,0.01386071,0.00022674509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9883925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3931217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005030687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012961689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.286528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977853240","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.25.1.031","title":"More Than an Empty Gesture: Enabling Women with Mental Disabilities to Testify on a Promise to Tell the Truth","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.026538420942600217,"score_gpt":0.2682822348483122,"score_spread":0.24174381390571198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977853240","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9333363,0.00055514846,0.000009599304,0.06316598,0.0006165836,0.00048335263,0.00003353992,0.0000061013693,0.001793408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98879546,0.000104546,0.000047164765,0.0039755288,0.00072624226,0.00009590036,0.0000011563864,0.000024279116,0.0062297466],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785805,0.00036549408,0.00036069725,0.00026230857,0.00028477685,0.00086865237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968414,0.00065235735,0.00018281609,0.00031086366,0.00019947269,0.0018131062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015204102,0.0002447443,0.00043934258,0.00017121539,0.0010919305,0.0007064909,0.0005458384,0.000080727994,0.00050566264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004069345,0.0001480074,0.0001062172,0.00066099846,0.0009808041,0.00042384487,0.000033059543,0.00044533386,0.00003690524],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032919785,0.00009170453,0.0015377948,0.00004995656,0.00024054076,0.0000363614,0.9466947,0.0005288922,0.000007694485,0.028439185,0.00068302714,0.021360993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005810858,0.0013913373,0.0024051212,0.00025586315,0.00020174186,0.00014928418,0.9609256,0.0000709362,0.000009280755,0.005775967,0.027957441,0.0002763494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12769485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3618636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23416877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012598882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006414455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8781139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980176298","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.22.1.247","title":"Empty Promises: Why Income Splitting for the Disabled Community Is Nothing to Get Excited About","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.037144047068654824,"score_gpt":0.29780889080218953,"score_spread":0.2606648437335347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980176298","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76203626,0.0013192621,0.00013745109,0.22912782,0.0022653425,0.00053003157,0.000105991334,0.000004820145,0.0044730315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9752531,0.00019583681,0.00017670193,0.016236506,0.0012580714,0.000028753959,6.2406025e-7,0.000018914123,0.00683151],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99764085,0.00047260037,0.00049965264,0.00016968689,0.0002762677,0.0009409626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960097,0.001859756,0.0005589567,0.00031090647,0.00024248083,0.0010181895],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008126733,0.00019615387,0.0004569985,0.000055717926,0.0033354221,0.0007616755,0.0013235481,0.0001627618,0.0002067057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014124368,0.00013544064,0.00020935088,0.00055534753,0.0020225474,0.00052775024,0.00007484138,0.0011272721,0.000005932536],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006972775,0.000021538528,0.0037850174,0.000059375714,0.00009767313,0.000008110689,0.5874888,0.000021970853,0.00001320267,0.39751709,0.003047828,0.007869703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014627813,0.00017297032,0.009608715,0.00037100946,0.000077744706,0.000039416664,0.08060638,0.00034623733,0.000009087499,0.1705215,0.73646766,0.00031650372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35092726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7518872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73341984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047930185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010715773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983449548","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.24.2.359","title":"Governing Heterosexuality through Specific Consent: Interrogating the Governmental Effects of <i>R. v J.A.</i>","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.054611553892183494,"score_gpt":0.29911875420017175,"score_spread":0.24450720030798825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983449548","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90542275,0.04086026,0.00011608846,0.016776022,0.004356498,0.0002706787,0.000061485254,0.0000043222135,0.03213188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918063,0.0013902129,0.000059717357,0.002183755,0.0009468599,0.000005304191,0.0000010961351,0.000015460497,0.0035912746],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758637,0.00081626006,0.0005264294,0.00011596425,0.0003008742,0.00065410516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969122,0.0017236144,0.0007093832,0.00014742065,0.00009679543,0.00041061625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025715446,0.00018185169,0.00047467873,0.000023894054,0.0007748534,0.00013086376,0.00032453105,0.000084395855,0.00012338551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038277844,0.00012513921,0.00014087539,0.00022717597,0.002219113,0.00049651094,0.00006211681,0.0003891232,0.00000999014],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006291409,0.000049243732,0.011166762,0.00015633508,0.00034891482,0.00001434653,0.53122497,0.0000129935315,0.000020107644,0.4535031,0.0019118277,0.001528512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028888313,0.00027755863,0.0034481543,0.0006752092,0.0001695215,0.00019189541,0.5146576,0.000025474503,0.00015871497,0.014031162,0.46312803,0.00034780958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015253513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042810306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4612162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00093879795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022113681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.991304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983637270","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.22.2.365","title":"“Doing No Violence to the Sentence Imposed”: Racialized Sex Worker Complainants, Racialized Offenders, and the Feminization of the <i>Homo Sacer</i> in Two Sexual Assault Cases","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015614362843812587,"score_gpt":0.27659840156060317,"score_spread":0.2609840387167906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983637270","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93463546,0.008094137,0.0000249699,0.05035416,0.0027156945,0.0007128331,0.000025156554,0.0000047131484,0.0034328827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917237,0.001962386,0.00007563728,0.002659487,0.0005938381,0.0000119859415,0.0000013302786,0.000021778258,0.0029498546],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963404,0.001630447,0.0007062182,0.00024125734,0.00037129465,0.0007103932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966999,0.001580949,0.0006481343,0.00033199304,0.000273122,0.00046586298],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006146644,0.00025635745,0.00064731506,0.000098556906,0.001385662,0.00031053694,0.00082814007,0.00019379532,0.00010138564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010120876,0.00013327548,0.00012955966,0.0007911185,0.0035567842,0.00022991246,0.00009307116,0.0011465136,0.000005423446],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012719602,0.00007640983,0.022660859,0.00009148857,0.00039435702,0.00019209523,0.74038726,0.00041747818,0.000120238336,0.1995859,0.001749703,0.03305228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.019778393,0.00034560976,0.006998862,0.0036254404,0.0005567225,0.0018997226,0.4235272,0.0016138293,0.00016826995,0.060900033,0.47954214,0.0010437673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07104006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30936933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4777924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002065561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000705848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984920196","doi":"10.1353/jwl.2006.0015","title":"Defining Moments for Women as Lawyers: Reflections on Numerical Gender Equality","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gender equality; Sociology; Mathematics; Gender studies; Calculus (dental); Medicine","score_opus":0.11300095921226927,"score_gpt":0.4067852068891015,"score_spread":0.29378424767683226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984920196","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27658537,0.0002035319,0.0002579921,0.25785545,0.00094731373,0.0003134275,0.000033332442,0.000014884413,0.4637887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97685665,0.00003101546,0.00027825875,0.014086819,0.0004596039,0.00003773322,0.000002071143,0.000009816808,0.00823805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987565,0.0002611358,0.00029661384,0.000104604056,0.00014299272,0.00043813928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983369,0.0005513916,0.00023812565,0.000107960135,0.00018226527,0.0005833367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030014794,0.00008102343,0.00017949619,0.00012765377,0.0009421528,0.00031170066,0.00019224004,0.00006142347,0.00046120887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009885815,0.000068737434,0.00005960118,0.00028594895,0.00022781605,0.00048108486,0.0000066272937,0.00035541685,0.000028272207],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054694425,0.000023733619,0.00011106664,0.0000044957055,0.00005099219,0.0000013254829,0.14741537,0.000027643506,0.0000010536631,0.84945863,0.0015153011,0.0013356655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068089034,0.00008510333,0.0002017097,0.000011805471,0.000010885987,0.000021129032,0.04202097,0.000009202688,0.000002937357,0.13751847,0.8193499,0.000087004206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009575494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031167004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8178346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011464086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018765298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988275482","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.24.1.180","title":"Pensions and Unpaid Work: A Reflection on Four Decades of Feminist Debate","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Ethnology; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.08528839096400993,"score_gpt":0.3209305273734365,"score_spread":0.2356421364094266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988275482","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8965856,0.010120956,0.0000022895476,0.050683342,0.0014453945,0.00014230523,0.00002102976,0.0000032960083,0.04099579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98728603,0.002980207,0.000028263645,0.0017965006,0.0012481884,0.000004062073,2.846516e-7,0.000012941757,0.0066435076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983687,0.00036722227,0.0003547603,0.00009482861,0.00014162043,0.0006729077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821675,0.00043238525,0.00035657757,0.00008820922,0.00009031906,0.00081578747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022050368,0.00014842075,0.00043090023,0.000121622696,0.0010112115,0.00007110209,0.00014967175,0.00014963563,0.00003056013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002954804,0.00010663079,0.000117650576,0.00034690375,0.002080216,0.00021574004,0.000025076959,0.00036762212,0.0000041981743],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011765895,0.000026312771,0.008465374,0.000047086498,0.0002189809,0.000017715412,0.21098822,0.0000038812664,0.000002784067,0.77382857,0.00092193845,0.0053614853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036077737,0.0008345018,0.03890585,0.0015489189,0.0004469522,0.00068167114,0.123288095,0.000008333451,0.00005785422,0.5540347,0.27590716,0.00067815284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017082706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0627125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27498522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000322619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033502327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9894626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988913116","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.21.2.229","title":"Shifting Rationales: The Waning Influence of Feminism on Canada’s Embryo Research Restrictions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Legislature; Legislation; Context (archaeology); Commission; Reproductive technology; Reproduction; Politics; Government (linguistics); Political science; Feminism; Sociology; Law; Embryo; Biology","score_opus":0.0562757672112782,"score_gpt":0.32172476483899964,"score_spread":0.26544899762772145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988913116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89814705,0.00083175534,0.0000038073658,0.092225425,0.00007382599,0.00019792203,0.000009189608,0.0000039586907,0.008507074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968775,0.0001564059,0.00004403832,0.0023404255,0.0001525181,0.000005077204,8.785184e-7,0.000006304183,0.00041683656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873245,0.00013286342,0.00034804796,0.00011929081,0.00028869175,0.00037868373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828464,0.0005075478,0.00019066877,0.00027051364,0.00042944215,0.00031720387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027259982,0.00007943224,0.00025035857,0.00019417395,0.000451155,0.00003213187,0.00020533378,0.000050380957,0.000008274247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021729378,0.000048306647,0.000037763137,0.00030767053,0.0004145423,0.000069123744,0.0000116929505,0.00073371,5.575528e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003310531,0.000028288403,0.0044431244,0.000079453835,0.00009615822,0.00023203749,0.013656906,0.00042751222,0.00019655934,0.97230184,0.0029521026,0.005254984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004461985,0.0026790393,0.49075052,0.0016538155,0.000084369065,0.0023685482,0.030384324,0.00007328892,0.00096802745,0.39571303,0.07053693,0.000326101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16609025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.349077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57658875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006295076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004771755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84648883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989128565","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.24.2.328","title":"<i>Every Breath You Take:</i> Erotic Asphyxiation, Vengeful Wives, and Other Enduring Myths in Spousal Sexual Assault Prosecutions","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Sexual assault; Mythology; Ethnology; Poison control; Art; Sociology; Philosophy; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Theology; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.03551256597344329,"score_gpt":0.27377217759016564,"score_spread":0.23825961161672235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989128565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9414601,0.023011109,0.000048061862,0.020429911,0.0016678807,0.0003247798,0.0000808114,0.000008237284,0.012969114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98781675,0.0004739848,0.00006756249,0.0021050766,0.0010712626,0.000014276487,0.0000018508008,0.000022787191,0.0084264595],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979163,0.00043977122,0.00046490965,0.0001669826,0.00021763906,0.0007944174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983912,0.00028117996,0.00031846832,0.00011640959,0.00015036007,0.0007423627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024372244,0.00020443433,0.00044099506,0.00015722495,0.0006545842,0.00018272892,0.00018176973,0.00016308574,0.00012731802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021712686,0.000178714,0.00005404217,0.00035472115,0.0009844291,0.00067901204,0.000029275929,0.00046859615,0.000010595059],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008800335,0.00010793009,0.17480564,0.00010027136,0.00029276143,0.000044337296,0.422172,0.00012823241,0.000005596327,0.39793345,0.0013966266,0.0029251436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005086924,0.00033763575,0.09193322,0.00045440774,0.00025368735,0.00051470555,0.21205536,0.00016006005,0.000008459364,0.018777326,0.66963434,0.0007838432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024862465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10885101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66823775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055724615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049969857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98163104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992339314","doi":"10.1353/jwl.2006.0002","title":"\"Pleasing Appearance. . . Only Adds to the Danger\": The 1930 Insanity Hearing of Violet Hypatia Bowyer","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Tribunal; Courage; Insanity; Humanities; Law; Art; Political science; Ethnology; Sociology","score_opus":0.036169077184268324,"score_gpt":0.29822477236844896,"score_spread":0.26205569518418065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992339314","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47547475,0.0477067,0.0002985283,0.41022497,0.0060024685,0.00048277466,0.00006945625,0.0000065618697,0.059733786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9684428,0.00043197456,0.000106955005,0.020660006,0.002796765,0.000008557503,0.00000102288,0.00003026502,0.007521627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99666494,0.0012403083,0.00078897283,0.00023353896,0.00025234313,0.00081990013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99677426,0.0008326057,0.00060639053,0.0005100322,0.0001307386,0.0011459684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045511746,0.00024601558,0.00059172,0.00011097083,0.0006476093,0.00013427806,0.00080647384,0.00019018435,0.0007426464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006672754,0.00014865182,0.00022004516,0.00036356426,0.0010686987,0.00027307068,0.000048898713,0.0015886866,0.00009198086],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015012893,0.00032654605,0.0018457894,0.00026208695,0.0009988773,0.00020785395,0.21106797,0.0003531517,0.000024362436,0.3791005,0.06200516,0.3423064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016369832,0.00032606677,0.0033076096,0.0004703309,0.00015231743,0.00091796217,0.005994809,0.00005083121,0.000004771747,0.008004457,0.9789447,0.0001891479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019260656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.091125995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91693956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005172287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008136576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9872702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992897212","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.26.1.23","title":"Race Matters: Sexism, Indigenous Sovereignty, and <i>McIvor</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Indigenous; Injustice; Transformative learning; Gender studies; Race (biology); Sociology; Colonialism; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Racism; Economic Justice; Dominance (genetics); Law; Politics","score_opus":0.019065747396475985,"score_gpt":0.25121861528699324,"score_spread":0.23215286789051726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992897212","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91470844,0.0020095103,0.00001125903,0.0498764,0.0003568528,0.00023383331,0.000012364569,0.000010234008,0.03278111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900863,0.00039081345,0.000061266466,0.006961482,0.00041275137,0.0000055211276,5.4793287e-7,0.0000114925215,0.002069789],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985928,0.00030859635,0.0002483034,0.00012642507,0.00016645913,0.000557437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985726,0.00031940883,0.00021181397,0.00009676184,0.00009813966,0.00070126925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019352826,0.00013235935,0.00036436197,0.000049127426,0.0011199039,0.00030026466,0.00027729297,0.00007949793,0.00010589089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020319062,0.000093674025,0.0000699326,0.00010292971,0.0010038933,0.00026393178,0.000034680466,0.00027418032,0.0000084830135],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004005393,0.00000959255,0.0034753298,0.00003677875,0.00014819152,0.00003721913,0.47127217,0.000007127605,0.000005414982,0.5195343,0.002063488,0.0033703516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028024649,0.00020080143,0.0054839025,0.00015979889,0.00008141008,0.0001882992,0.082650304,0.000013680628,0.000012890848,0.2571278,0.6508207,0.00045798783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05066072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15818545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64875716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003828888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020909544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.955661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993372504","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.22.2.397","title":"Sexual Assault Law, Credibility, and “Ideal Victims”: Consent, Resistance, and Victim Blaming","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":228,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Criminology; Art; Sociology","score_opus":0.03614340751261584,"score_gpt":0.2932548257744881,"score_spread":0.2571114182618722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993372504","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8777545,0.009372781,0.000024906249,0.060127422,0.0021120305,0.000248398,0.00008163824,0.000011234541,0.05026707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97906387,0.0010934713,0.000225154,0.0031175327,0.000941522,0.00000655183,0.0000020288198,0.000023036779,0.0155268125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997706,0.000433452,0.00056244846,0.00030217724,0.00027169083,0.0007242611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99685097,0.0010916058,0.00039622956,0.00018371418,0.00035590722,0.0011215647],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003545764,0.00025743226,0.0006135741,0.00011904046,0.0014945767,0.00048186016,0.0002454739,0.0002549596,0.00014805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052537996,0.00022057266,0.00006103669,0.00028379535,0.004522024,0.00047518132,0.000066629116,0.0008591244,0.000003751405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013862878,0.000028911092,0.012841347,0.00013886196,0.00029722686,0.00010173552,0.15782712,0.000005839857,0.000019714751,0.8235875,0.0029526928,0.0020604252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036924854,0.00025297943,0.006267398,0.00021364974,0.00021344666,0.0004740813,0.10715272,0.0001472717,0.000007753786,0.11990886,0.76112664,0.0005427099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032284737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7340674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75817394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020867205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007300738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001427335","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.23.2.627","title":"Do Women Refugee Judges Really Make a Difference? An Empirical Analysis of Gender and Outcomes in Canadian Refugee Determinations","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Political science; Humanities; Palestinian refugees; Ethnology; Sociology; Art; Law","score_opus":0.06603884986615195,"score_gpt":0.3096297230078696,"score_spread":0.24359087314171768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001427335","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9716914,0.00386503,0.0000040338036,0.0075190114,0.00027402944,0.00014698485,0.00018299512,0.0000025713696,0.016313927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968502,0.0006720372,0.000058961305,0.0014410573,0.00009797413,0.000015414647,0.0000026583252,0.000009558021,0.0008521762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975541,0.0004805569,0.00062780513,0.00023579692,0.00021873618,0.000883009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974061,0.00026297924,0.00032077485,0.00018053716,0.0002153157,0.00161425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022269154,0.00021155954,0.00091304746,0.00069486676,0.00058598066,0.000107183776,0.00038094982,0.00016678715,0.00026134407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030101225,0.0001697944,0.00015633611,0.0008499261,0.0025059334,0.00023312449,0.00003617247,0.00033762903,0.000001609539],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028910377,0.000034625667,0.31166705,0.000011197823,0.0006930579,0.00010169889,0.13575827,0.000004076974,2.6345597e-7,0.547791,0.0000168372,0.003892973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007084988,0.00017104085,0.7598062,0.000066198816,0.0003951029,0.00004153404,0.027202632,0.000028146533,3.1081436e-7,0.19809346,0.013252073,0.00023475141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7155606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9919521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4481392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012825632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021485388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9233216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002490768","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.23.1.235","title":"Global Care Chains, Employment Agencies, and the Conundrum of Jurisdiction: Decent Work for Domestic Workers in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.023281587627638628,"score_gpt":0.24124192833384073,"score_spread":0.2179603407062021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002490768","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9434942,0.029709578,0.000023946774,0.019660523,0.0019203206,0.00055425934,0.00021522278,0.0000014151958,0.0044205566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949325,0.0014142189,0.000039448747,0.0019921274,0.00015210423,0.000018824803,0.0000016448348,0.000009258575,0.0014398778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983333,0.00029531412,0.0004757733,0.00013269995,0.00017602641,0.00058690354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850166,0.00024885772,0.00033603483,0.00014313585,0.00015362135,0.0006167179],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001315702,0.00015159388,0.00042298043,0.000049138554,0.0004199495,0.0000681314,0.00031211507,0.00006723448,0.000085929925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008547593,0.0001040945,0.0000853408,0.00037190397,0.0012878417,0.00010892802,0.000027321428,0.00017905519,1.13952645e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025408666,0.00001339486,0.05318579,0.000037303624,0.00019694238,0.000056181492,0.10939601,0.000044045722,3.5083154e-8,0.8308764,0.00077112543,0.0051686973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011174125,0.00035911752,0.22787513,0.0009999755,0.0003338539,0.00009747404,0.3864793,0.000041453037,0.0000018096788,0.08967744,0.28250763,0.00045269806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97308064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74119896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028866483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005607169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99468774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002968574","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.23.2.405","title":"The Gendered Dimensions of Sexting: Assessing the Applicability of Canada's Child Pornography Provision","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Gender, Feminism, and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Psychology; Pornography; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.03587047074757947,"score_gpt":0.25650473101982807,"score_spread":0.22063426027224858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002968574","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.913385,0.0108530605,0.000024690267,0.027727136,0.0016068598,0.000514927,0.000056422545,0.0000030426654,0.04582886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973624,0.0007506441,0.000052947464,0.0006611835,0.00023075163,0.000007423982,8.1170646e-7,0.000014964022,0.0009188846],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99726063,0.00072284084,0.00073388795,0.0001741191,0.0003538647,0.00075463456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968257,0.000781024,0.0008964461,0.00037767462,0.0002721388,0.000847023],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00539928,0.00018506809,0.00048346858,0.000068722315,0.0013939135,0.000082020546,0.0006851154,0.00011953323,0.000058900365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036804218,0.00009912869,0.00021098336,0.00040360124,0.0028418805,0.00015042751,0.00004725997,0.00054996845,3.4028267e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000108103566,0.000099874545,0.009729102,0.00018719563,0.00049937854,0.000046988018,0.5929566,0.000020118927,0.00003096037,0.3737016,0.0018830441,0.020737026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001849557,0.0003051611,0.03698399,0.000508098,0.0003195417,0.00026031592,0.6111517,0.000066525914,0.0002258567,0.15699781,0.19092216,0.00040926662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4771765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8790519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40187547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029907766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004129308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999061},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003420303","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.26.2.05","title":"Taking It Personally: Delimiting Gender-Based Refugee Claims Using the Complementary Protection Provision in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Denial; Persecution; Criminology; Covert; Torture; Oppression; Performative utterance; Refugee law; Law; Political science; Sociology; Human rights; Psychology","score_opus":0.08391561068537427,"score_gpt":0.28680214850403596,"score_spread":0.20288653781866167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003420303","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97714406,0.00019967004,0.00022768168,0.018180624,0.00029173787,0.0003103849,0.0000069944267,0.000003110473,0.0036357087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99524134,0.000011890009,0.00005905574,0.0043223775,0.00029962507,0.0000073905057,0.0000012094574,0.00001112853,0.000045985453],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817145,0.0005888082,0.00032962675,0.00013131624,0.0002560749,0.0005227234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989346,0.00017843691,0.00033492286,0.000113865746,0.000099932375,0.00033820476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031788512,0.00011203119,0.00022190655,0.00009295597,0.0009888541,0.00017023824,0.0003162263,0.00004355365,0.00008421882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014197694,0.000082718885,0.000059400252,0.00017415332,0.00021548734,0.00013716012,0.000016351434,0.00037517896,3.5207458e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000297522,0.000040775576,0.04106939,0.00021655463,0.00021910803,0.00018878047,0.59460175,0.0031026967,0.00012250831,0.32393554,0.00041776308,0.0357876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006750518,0.00032072735,0.024388919,0.00073379494,0.00013588039,0.00027838777,0.61951256,0.03304863,0.000053046733,0.07954695,0.23428176,0.0009488232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95664394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99783677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2443886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001682568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033255972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76055664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005008668","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.25.2.183","title":"The Tale of Assisted Human Reproduction Canada: A Tragedy in Five Acts","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reproduction; Human reproduction; Agency (philosophy); Political science; Law; Sociology; Biology; Ecology; Social science; Genetics","score_opus":0.024156253641964293,"score_gpt":0.25603190706572004,"score_spread":0.23187565342375574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005008668","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9496805,0.0017486113,7.9758615e-7,0.045143783,0.0001923214,0.00035003212,0.0000042626384,0.0000038153717,0.0028758857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99759465,0.00012809821,0.00002194475,0.00047322072,0.00012042654,0.00001764375,0.0000013568671,0.0000093622075,0.0016333011],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988647,0.00009848797,0.00042329886,0.00014616041,0.00011326434,0.0003540621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987554,0.00011528464,0.00029155373,0.00034065006,0.00019523568,0.0003018964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013032487,0.00009279844,0.00035552256,0.00011988105,0.00019008409,0.000028640221,0.00015372019,0.000054874403,0.000019857933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007890615,0.0000557446,0.000045474622,0.00019655525,0.00042016618,0.00008117652,0.000012331849,0.0004270116,6.0766706e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020742696,0.00032159407,0.08688805,0.0013908857,0.0013777416,0.0016428566,0.060024112,0.00009339477,0.0040993704,0.66810673,0.027975613,0.14600539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00701809,0.0011406416,0.7911634,0.0006011689,0.00009063603,0.0031635466,0.025019646,0.00002691566,0.0018197249,0.105811864,0.06383113,0.00031322992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56872797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8789729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70427537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005365004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013134716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43414393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005671913","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.22.1.001","title":"L'analyse comparative entre les sexes : la difficile mise en œuvre du droit à l'égalité. Analyse du Rapport de la vérificatrice générale du Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Parliament; Government (linguistics); Legislation; Political science; Convention; Audit; Public administration; Law; Management; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.020438838011045388,"score_gpt":0.2643106599260179,"score_spread":0.24387182191497248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005671913","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9384962,0.0001726508,0.000022640455,0.009063219,0.00023255445,0.00012899083,0.000044188153,0.0000057617535,0.051833846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99650526,0.00015128404,0.00005354051,0.0004383502,0.0005952643,0.000007408231,0.00000666138,0.0000130153185,0.0022292042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979379,0.0007572035,0.00037255933,0.00017163242,0.00023479295,0.0005258835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99754864,0.000786222,0.0003042616,0.00017400699,0.00016303304,0.0010238244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023849022,0.00015138458,0.0003854365,0.00014282453,0.0007012999,0.00028470572,0.00043508396,0.00012606071,0.00019758797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002355911,0.00012902451,0.00013449899,0.00022623714,0.00074494374,0.00014237617,0.00002077679,0.00041121533,0.0000017059069],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008449995,0.00009982494,0.11358886,0.0000457598,0.00066346856,0.00084444927,0.41602358,0.00048567183,0.00022424354,0.4560088,0.01117117,0.00075967575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038294592,0.00009632238,0.06999085,0.000063581894,0.000543473,0.0010700608,0.553694,0.001290233,0.00026640148,0.08628655,0.28202662,0.0008424617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7999598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95550495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36972225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005755639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045253746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80278206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011710302","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.25.1.148","title":"The Case for the Federation of Law Societies Rejecting Trinity Western University's Proposed Law Degree Program","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Academic freedom; Sexual orientation; Legal profession; Sociology; Higher education","score_opus":0.054975110701719655,"score_gpt":0.2780333447581323,"score_spread":0.22305823405641265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011710302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7757284,0.010693759,0.00009177481,0.15588471,0.0019359215,0.0026954892,0.000060121743,0.000015392108,0.05289442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915087,0.00026649475,0.00003224899,0.0007170891,0.0006190211,0.000012321309,5.5992115e-7,0.000012497711,0.006831027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833685,0.00047806965,0.00040058378,0.000120177254,0.00015015015,0.0005141783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973564,0.001098905,0.0005758754,0.00013488057,0.00048845174,0.00034548962],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030663041,0.00013922827,0.00033541885,0.000024832374,0.0039185807,0.00079822214,0.00038425016,0.000121396464,0.000019268326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016761429,0.00008325872,0.00017005453,0.00018359903,0.0025313776,0.00059060444,0.000027620965,0.00033756637,0.0000019603085],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064485044,0.000019809555,0.00013825313,0.0001410966,0.00018100765,0.000054332595,0.0581349,0.000010677496,0.0000019641475,0.9306027,0.00046371712,0.010187036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022856805,0.0006901785,0.00016960192,0.00038087333,0.0002168927,0.0006154867,0.20489116,0.00019203474,0.000036221565,0.18599471,0.60425025,0.0002768948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41481328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.860672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.744608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037924483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083498884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015897128","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.26.1.116","title":"Taking “Culture” out of Multiculturalism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Religion, Society, and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Politics; Sociology; Secularism; Political science; Gender studies; Islam; Racism; Inequality; Norm (philosophy); Public sphere; Political economy; Law","score_opus":0.029096648690662703,"score_gpt":0.27395342025699343,"score_spread":0.24485677156633073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015897128","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9578786,0.0022106862,0.000038104947,0.007636183,0.0007995239,0.00012778294,0.000004212726,0.000005459793,0.031299468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958371,0.0010544475,0.00021942268,0.0015751335,0.00035614485,0.000002702969,7.486806e-7,0.0000065737045,0.0009477358],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988831,0.00020851944,0.00030202843,0.00008535422,0.00016928879,0.00035165914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987348,0.00014149351,0.00035175955,0.00008944347,0.00018872808,0.0004938193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020336902,0.00009116471,0.00028487068,0.000041490475,0.00040681206,0.00011698397,0.00027270598,0.00007871316,0.000047713194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003460325,0.00006074279,0.00011471645,0.00009833417,0.0005398498,0.00013725816,0.0000125688475,0.00017171842,0.000003659796],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010754805,0.0000046225327,0.00033320548,0.000014771166,0.000055582208,0.0000058124433,0.80711454,0.000007738162,0.000013519286,0.18847711,0.0036244234,0.00033791893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002951281,0.00013465187,0.00883572,0.00029250368,0.00006270199,0.000060396975,0.32331535,0.000031213178,0.00006935196,0.19138321,0.47247157,0.00039208136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046099078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08514006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48379922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026718475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032774068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96025306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024055326","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.21.1.1","title":"<i>Rapport minoritaire</i> : La dissidence fait juge","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Unanimity; Vision; Variety (cybernetics); Relation (database); Parallels; State (computer science); Sociology; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Theology; Computer science","score_opus":0.018422563699260944,"score_gpt":0.2548530868836951,"score_spread":0.2364305231844342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024055326","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46621317,0.0041404082,0.000018959374,0.13779648,0.000609449,0.00022716817,0.000019634786,0.000019426043,0.3909553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97921765,0.00042644734,0.000052451618,0.005204928,0.0004758345,0.0000025988354,7.465251e-7,0.000006053321,0.014613285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878234,0.00021898208,0.0002400072,0.00011003752,0.00017731072,0.00047131703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987267,0.00012155466,0.00016969097,0.000121884616,0.000091667745,0.00076845154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020233267,0.00010712365,0.00025599275,0.000014720016,0.00069947576,0.00024963825,0.0004083712,0.00011926975,0.0001404438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012364567,0.000078218414,0.00013615815,0.00016547769,0.00082909886,0.00032034767,0.000008812293,0.00034168575,0.0000058701557],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017650835,0.000009856839,0.00036019736,0.0000069569837,0.00003155024,0.000113644426,0.12852186,0.0000019505992,0.000004760919,0.85703343,0.011750116,0.0021480366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006474488,0.00006934206,0.0013495986,0.00006880838,0.000027743637,0.00014981131,0.032050367,0.0000017683935,0.0000050233803,0.3016888,0.6637858,0.00015550939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004171392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03718628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6520357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002189125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085804437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98038256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028674168","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.23.2.519","title":"A Tale of Two Cultures: Intimate Femicide, Cultural Defences, and the Law of Provocation","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Ethnology; Jurisprudence; Provocation test; Philosophy; Sociology; Theology","score_opus":0.02916426186936547,"score_gpt":0.2698131775472888,"score_spread":0.24064891567792332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028674168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.867282,0.030190492,0.000009361697,0.017813623,0.0008641964,0.00046002705,0.000068791334,0.0000041851163,0.08330734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99108666,0.0033116692,0.00018447972,0.0013083052,0.00025598874,0.000008552012,0.000001858014,0.000008915934,0.0038335694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983088,0.0004608228,0.00050663203,0.00013124166,0.00018931122,0.0004032372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832696,0.00015963311,0.00069273193,0.00014397787,0.0003105316,0.00036619123],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023091533,0.00016126846,0.00048702655,0.000013277256,0.00055072596,0.00010539348,0.00044907897,0.00014590508,0.00012527284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000111110785,0.00009149612,0.0001914474,0.00025080072,0.0069000944,0.00045552404,0.000032344185,0.00037800608,0.0000017208181],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006744385,0.00001292511,0.00029378958,0.000072399554,0.00011936089,0.0000043602654,0.34370783,0.000003982827,0.000011837257,0.65490156,0.00043970285,0.00036477207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0044717845,0.00021352165,0.00043387068,0.0007004943,0.00031306254,0.00024357783,0.24174795,0.000042678414,0.0002591847,0.696515,0.054783918,0.00027492837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06842303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14394383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12380468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015599214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003614163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029132037","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.23.2.579","title":"The Practices of Lesbian Mothers and Quebec's Reforms","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Ethnology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.03637481338695226,"score_gpt":0.24360036924634573,"score_spread":0.20722555585939348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029132037","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6769111,0.06381211,0.0000037699326,0.06709743,0.002165711,0.00025558783,0.00006150834,0.00000365718,0.18968913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88461375,0.00786057,0.000029473626,0.001101437,0.0003460145,0.000003360361,3.3442515e-7,0.000017265731,0.10602781],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984646,0.00034866735,0.0004002581,0.00011752774,0.00015249915,0.00051646313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975256,0.0002825488,0.00096589036,0.00018404325,0.00012430646,0.00091762963],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029768248,0.00011795787,0.00032626773,0.0001929824,0.0012506109,0.0004415489,0.0004396672,0.00011954093,0.00038425272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031387078,0.000090963156,0.00011195619,0.00020796918,0.005791737,0.0005971037,0.000019689789,0.00038981426,0.0000071924433],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006896754,0.000009720345,0.00040866906,0.000046001507,0.00014175313,0.00005740325,0.22924846,6.2831214e-7,9.870098e-7,0.75184435,0.0016575205,0.016515551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005750399,0.000110091416,0.0019866775,0.0001535118,0.00007761063,0.00014563327,0.057759665,0.000004496643,0.0000016281059,0.06868015,0.87038076,0.00012476115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9664884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8687232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013006902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002603913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030458703","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.24.2.301","title":"Minority of One: Violet King's Entry to the Legal Profession","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art; Ethnology; Sociology","score_opus":0.021098969128464883,"score_gpt":0.24481920978910704,"score_spread":0.22372024066064217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030458703","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79815036,0.024205713,0.000009548753,0.12444447,0.0055706147,0.00032268983,0.00010808778,0.0000029534685,0.047185533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9477874,0.00056124985,0.000023851506,0.0031530017,0.0019500337,0.0000057956804,9.709977e-7,0.000011615365,0.046506077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783164,0.0005779601,0.00042717133,0.000111424655,0.00024960554,0.0008021701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974972,0.00019174661,0.0003730116,0.00021358268,0.0001363479,0.0015881178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003420062,0.00013066808,0.000400148,0.00024594864,0.0010730898,0.00027323235,0.0005272667,0.00014430188,0.0006869957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021737999,0.000112726324,0.00016482788,0.0003521703,0.0017801683,0.00047398053,0.000037825943,0.0005501804,0.000036533584],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006810279,0.000043975895,0.0018134721,0.00010229188,0.000107063934,0.000029275314,0.16583525,0.000006068711,0.000005951706,0.80279857,0.02005267,0.009137329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005499388,0.00008057683,0.0046568797,0.00031117856,0.00008878773,0.00010275483,0.013583515,0.0000023578546,0.0000046850737,0.007824256,0.97264886,0.00014619144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7202938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9657842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9525962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020016213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022902384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82534474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031267729","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.24.1.207","title":"Mandatory Family Mediation and the Settlement Mission: A Feminist Critique","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Settlement (finance); Family mediation; Alternative dispute resolution; Dispute resolution; Party-directed mediation; Lawyer supported mediation; Transformative mediation; Family law; Economic Justice; Political science; Power (physics); Law; Dispute mechanism; Criminology; Sociology; Gender studies; Business","score_opus":0.03219285432878593,"score_gpt":0.28928956723856775,"score_spread":0.2570967129097818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031267729","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5636907,0.095835045,0.000008133895,0.3156371,0.0024750931,0.0004611432,0.0000984246,0.000005211246,0.021789117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812917,0.0047215642,0.000041455452,0.0074673574,0.0015244652,0.000012959254,0.0000018437552,0.000011797613,0.0049268375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976853,0.00083830004,0.00041996737,0.00011882613,0.00024180664,0.00069579127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99772257,0.0006876048,0.0003281728,0.000107722066,0.00011805418,0.0010358938],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048431875,0.00018210898,0.00043203216,0.00003652337,0.0013719354,0.0002344183,0.00026437876,0.0001221955,0.00017034139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037620222,0.0001072203,0.000118340715,0.00013537194,0.0030334298,0.0003732977,0.00004693882,0.00043128894,0.000008458279],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007464934,0.000014539993,0.002586125,0.000056625693,0.00017890861,0.000017766226,0.3563961,0.0000016252485,0.000002021496,0.6312621,0.006702268,0.0027072197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028248597,0.000069252514,0.007840798,0.00019466774,0.00013076425,0.00010973194,0.13106728,0.000017606057,0.0000034166546,0.029712219,0.82781607,0.00021335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02198694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03290255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82111377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007453748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003325477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031972923","doi":"10.1353/jwl.2006.0011","title":"Troubling the Definition of Pornography: Little Sisters, a New Defining Moment in Feminists' Engagement with the Law?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pornography; Feminism; Lesbian; Supreme court; Harm; Economic Justice; Law; Identity (music); Sociology; Sexual orientation; Appeal; Political science; Gender studies; Aesthetics; Art","score_opus":0.04530703119893826,"score_gpt":0.2694244258199427,"score_spread":0.22411739462100444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031972923","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8319529,0.002894428,0.000015763282,0.13344681,0.000107139764,0.00030742268,0.000009118065,0.000004766809,0.03126163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970884,0.0002636276,0.00024644684,0.0019644916,0.00017867015,0.000014169739,9.324987e-7,0.0000077862105,0.00023552874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986012,0.00035351308,0.00031282371,0.000099586374,0.00022543537,0.0004074559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988494,0.0004203692,0.0002931859,0.00011014086,0.00007838423,0.00024851676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027011305,0.00011618297,0.00026497434,0.000054347503,0.00088407204,0.00017236693,0.00031799325,0.00004080223,0.000041219904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000081167826,0.00005860423,0.00009568198,0.0002448721,0.000827004,0.00017909982,0.000025280222,0.0003388281,0.000001454056],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060593804,0.000011122411,0.0016775464,0.000010087218,0.00010901582,0.00000830896,0.35067487,0.000050614468,0.0000026638443,0.6460385,0.00028980424,0.001066887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0048380173,0.00037256943,0.010466659,0.00051431276,0.0001775773,0.000053955842,0.63660705,0.000025885,0.000035713103,0.04724296,0.29924953,0.00041579214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04795464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42743573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59879553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044198622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002931777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9583851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031981910","doi":"10.1353/jwl.2006.0003","title":"Remembering Favourite Feminist Legal Scholarship","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Jurisprudence; Tribute; Empowerment; Feminism; Feminist legal theory; Sociology; Gender studies; Field (mathematics); Critical legal studies; Colonialism; Reproductive justice; Law; Political science; Legal realism; Legal research","score_opus":0.026304113795050342,"score_gpt":0.2712639225398518,"score_spread":0.24495980874480147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031981910","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68299586,0.002690079,0.0000048552797,0.058056775,0.0005012605,0.00012996573,0.00001244797,0.000012659685,0.25559613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811963,0.00030730656,0.00013773228,0.0056332317,0.0012238484,0.0000032786486,6.002653e-7,0.000011332993,0.011486374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987,0.00021035712,0.000263618,0.000107833475,0.00018610439,0.00053205865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986912,0.00011238444,0.00017246579,0.00012294011,0.00010077754,0.00080020126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029226162,0.00010601025,0.00024155674,0.000018751294,0.001067771,0.0004810381,0.00041601574,0.00011941434,0.00022833934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020496189,0.00008241023,0.00013447013,0.00015985455,0.0007673339,0.00047874424,0.000017279594,0.0005388025,0.000012788256],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002287088,0.0000068027935,0.00075410306,0.00001025402,0.00005433631,0.00004837694,0.12106051,0.00001423513,0.000006619891,0.87466264,0.0017143243,0.001644935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007352211,0.000025877214,0.00029943048,0.00007140067,0.000019483867,0.00014121948,0.021319104,0.0000036826539,0.000012064964,0.040052813,0.9371896,0.00013011838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004500346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17815042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93547523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049374305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062613783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8368462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032220794","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.21.2.315","title":"Producing Paternity: The Role of Legal Fatherhood in Maintaining the Traditional Family","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Openness to experience; Family law; Legislature; Sociology; Law; Ideology; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.030739199553426938,"score_gpt":0.24720511852374913,"score_spread":0.2164659189703222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032220794","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9357916,0.002468318,0.000006659722,0.056492634,0.000084134,0.00026092998,0.000008247621,0.0000048932807,0.0048825666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968162,0.00010700392,0.00003804916,0.0026841029,0.000226068,0.000007669701,0.0000012104462,0.000007985452,0.000111713205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989356,0.000119021286,0.00035096222,0.00012461493,0.00012523223,0.0003445904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999139,0.00014158145,0.0002048564,0.00025597375,0.0000837796,0.00017478324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020883174,0.00009963108,0.00031016776,0.00012346261,0.0001606259,0.000037318125,0.00021702348,0.0000473759,0.00001090073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032254026,0.000050201696,0.000068699934,0.00017470855,0.000375653,0.00009554609,0.000009842166,0.0005767609,6.8472576e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006929847,0.000083595245,0.019676436,0.000057628527,0.0001665264,0.00026231076,0.047552995,0.000076536264,0.0004701092,0.87951976,0.00021014686,0.05123096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002989802,0.0010399641,0.29691577,0.00040032898,0.00005781072,0.0022797429,0.030891798,0.00007801795,0.00051997736,0.6513121,0.013361654,0.00015300441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026924673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026486989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27723932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018986165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005459646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40702233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032270569","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.26.2.01","title":"Does the System of Judicial Appointment Matter? Exploring Women’s Representation on Ontario’s Courts","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Diversity (politics); Government (linguistics); Political science; Public administration; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04306756853649768,"score_gpt":0.2633196467962379,"score_spread":0.22025207825974025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032270569","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9658977,0.000023853268,0.000028756964,0.009536902,0.0009139457,0.00018273733,0.000005232106,0.0000030372769,0.023407854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997719,0.000019944013,0.000010478584,0.0005975831,0.00043135454,0.000038531627,7.2917624e-7,0.000008230277,0.001174155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859935,0.0003748948,0.00032709597,0.00010503968,0.00022688438,0.00036673978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886525,0.00022439176,0.00030477406,0.00016192255,0.0000974615,0.0003461959],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002177869,0.000084214575,0.00023940661,0.00008892896,0.0004753436,0.0001311246,0.0002284224,0.00003766497,0.00009168081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000068892325,0.000045216937,0.00007070879,0.00006814877,0.00033605134,0.00013272846,0.000014173542,0.00016487813,0.000004789262],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051926647,0.000010092819,0.004787705,0.000028652112,0.000075522905,0.000008864028,0.34626153,0.0001543794,0.000004313577,0.6477258,0.00021031401,0.0006808426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003267334,0.00039542775,0.047631327,0.0004099547,0.000101558595,0.0000778182,0.5158488,0.00012823378,0.00021896197,0.37870917,0.0528596,0.00035182596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23237157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35432613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26901668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010738655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041397396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7727401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033790983","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.23.2.600","title":"When Bare Breasts Are a “Threat”: The Production of Bodies/Spaces in Law","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Ethnology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.07547992627095017,"score_gpt":0.27399853034489546,"score_spread":0.19851860407394528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033790983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8143853,0.02532173,0.0000021307844,0.10939666,0.0022216828,0.00034274472,0.0000501659,0.000004402947,0.04827517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98579097,0.0014638623,0.000026630973,0.0013469466,0.000537168,0.000010413769,5.7477524e-7,0.000014283763,0.01080916],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780273,0.0006572552,0.0005093272,0.00019408067,0.00021353952,0.00062307384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99852467,0.00023334076,0.00039220572,0.00023151834,0.00021381908,0.00040442357],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031905463,0.00019324427,0.00056036474,0.000098193384,0.00061728404,0.0000967795,0.00044297177,0.000120256125,0.00013850052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027513778,0.00013273997,0.00012437101,0.00020496854,0.0038305402,0.0003220271,0.000040043684,0.00039942254,0.0000040737978],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074160875,0.00002962098,0.0062720664,0.00008137403,0.00015267855,0.000036458026,0.6099746,0.0000034591349,8.0266636e-7,0.38114226,0.0012512739,0.0009812354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000848138,0.0002116892,0.011201475,0.00053711346,0.000100906094,0.00019015581,0.6860699,0.000003926842,0.000017866445,0.220115,0.08047225,0.00023159212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14691246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7923739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64546144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039871162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053210807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99888045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034081025","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.25.2.249","title":"Women as Patients, Not Spare Parts: Examining the Relationship between the Physician and Women Egg Providers","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Secrecy; Donation; Egg donation; Family medicine; Spare part; Medical care; Medicine; Medical record; Business; Law; Gynecology; Political science; Surgery","score_opus":0.05944436368892934,"score_gpt":0.2665356390372726,"score_spread":0.2070912753483433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034081025","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.940519,0.0005513514,0.0000024377548,0.055965368,0.000106591426,0.00068595767,0.000011849403,0.00001266133,0.0021448303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926689,0.00006511898,0.000015693426,0.006048787,0.00028850583,0.00012625537,0.0000031058344,0.00002172002,0.0007618785],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836975,0.00018739137,0.0003972881,0.00020091936,0.0001679916,0.00067666866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977207,0.0007989042,0.00033141347,0.0003957883,0.00015200744,0.0006011926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016074791,0.00017047847,0.00041690856,0.00011603053,0.0005569821,0.00015979963,0.00024949736,0.00008205804,0.000032544256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001321831,0.00008836183,0.000041782117,0.0002026164,0.0008078991,0.00025711107,0.000041483767,0.000668094,0.0000103895845],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002533109,0.000030769894,0.79153806,0.00019989614,0.0003379702,0.00003138603,0.11657872,0.000006644718,0.000003870257,0.05455993,0.0017563959,0.034703035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020456829,0.0007102815,0.82398254,0.00015152793,0.000044439614,0.00009137485,0.045027792,0.0000043750847,0.000011338147,0.108116925,0.019666495,0.00014724009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001658341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005165838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07155093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005072166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000447733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42839128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036720829","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.25.1.111","title":"Disability and Care: Still Not “Getting It”","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Ethnology; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03274786859055405,"score_gpt":0.26834873718814833,"score_spread":0.23560086859759427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036720829","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7753955,0.01278419,0.0000011328813,0.20338592,0.0008467492,0.00029405917,0.000029255772,0.000004112845,0.0072590816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911315,0.0010407058,0.00008839228,0.002847491,0.0007965707,0.000013609455,7.4549314e-7,0.000013765738,0.0040672105],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977956,0.0005073633,0.0004727385,0.00020660898,0.00020417306,0.0008135207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99745893,0.00063531037,0.00031949233,0.00013536969,0.00027367362,0.0011772396],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016314032,0.00021757667,0.00054424553,0.000026323729,0.0010340131,0.00042552545,0.00031256958,0.00014145032,0.00037280747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060455245,0.00015603246,0.00013836053,0.00016496882,0.00448609,0.0005806576,0.000062532,0.000510176,0.00001892369],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032128355,0.00002217694,0.019271938,0.00021543627,0.00026425027,0.0000379709,0.75008,0.000013242079,0.00000566062,0.19963083,0.0021646025,0.02826179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023674187,0.00022274711,0.061438233,0.0004489824,0.00017145726,0.00012766536,0.42390788,0.00006543033,0.000009107646,0.048847627,0.4618002,0.0005932594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28083435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35066482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4596356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013717153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025522677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039156858","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.26.2.06","title":"Just Horseplay? Masculinity and Workplace Grievances in Fordist Canada, 1947–70s","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Historical Gender and Feminism Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Masculinity; Fordism; Arbitration; Intimidation; Ideology; Sociology; Grievance; Gender studies; Criminology; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.023414335669776583,"score_gpt":0.2518510504743607,"score_spread":0.2284367148045841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039156858","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66829675,0.0062378407,0.000052273346,0.028467193,0.0014923473,0.00026102242,0.00003051922,0.00000761245,0.29515442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951574,0.0005050131,0.00002649657,0.0012623245,0.0002902501,0.0000047817803,4.3875096e-7,0.0000071018276,0.0027461569],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869984,0.00025427234,0.00028027545,0.0001289804,0.00015910268,0.00047754086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862456,0.0004073155,0.00013450775,0.00009464855,0.000058269914,0.0006806725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021614244,0.00011056028,0.00036177202,0.00006463232,0.00064840436,0.0000892954,0.000223125,0.000058647933,0.000030659357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037077224,0.00008616788,0.00004519588,0.00017697089,0.000651802,0.000120509976,0.000019233306,0.00028641688,8.9692986e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015561264,0.000018627201,0.026734095,0.000070772905,0.00012032013,0.00012709267,0.58441764,0.000026091346,8.6042616e-7,0.37057972,0.009904447,0.007844707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020383343,0.00011749126,0.015077237,0.00010451962,0.00004354554,0.000048346552,0.15122682,0.000026349295,0.0000014208694,0.0714995,0.759475,0.0003414683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7315174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9941374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74957055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061654806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009623606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49870673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044505823","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.27.1.94","title":"Surrogates in Quebec: The Good, the Bad, and the Foreigner","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Law; Order (exchange); Political science; Portrait; Sociology; Psychology; History; Business","score_opus":0.030423776065012863,"score_gpt":0.2604823510179169,"score_spread":0.23005857495290402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044505823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7702411,0.008259742,0.0000027105878,0.21203665,0.00015700208,0.00041465726,0.0000043881123,0.0000054133898,0.0088783605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930907,0.00042741475,0.000014015432,0.004030884,0.00021495736,0.00002357005,7.1216033e-7,0.00001177198,0.0021859622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988085,0.00023723951,0.0003062418,0.00012543719,0.000121728895,0.00040086883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99852777,0.00047767232,0.00017501714,0.00035948906,0.000119109514,0.00034092172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003928471,0.00012170046,0.00036359695,0.000084975,0.00023092562,0.000096975535,0.00028141064,0.00006460491,0.0000124516155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00090102234,0.00004518643,0.0000617485,0.00018810513,0.0015622617,0.00010404491,0.00003685285,0.0005803446,0.000002452011],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00089626585,0.000015179151,0.02313871,0.000046172958,0.00014532525,0.00011694766,0.041047096,0.000010410098,0.0000028007792,0.9234095,0.002668411,0.008503188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014503657,0.0004958639,0.04635707,0.00026170688,0.00013649756,0.0031111066,0.06427844,0.00011268569,0.000057031928,0.6744092,0.19605629,0.00022044763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045101296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20733288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2490003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020509551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006282351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96125746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045288846","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.23.2.686","title":"Beyond Country of Origin: <i>Smith v. Canada</i> and Refugees from Unexpected Places","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Country; Geography; Economic geography; Ethnology; Political science; History; Archaeology; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.01452583233195732,"score_gpt":0.23023262731416105,"score_spread":0.21570679498220374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045288846","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9516732,0.0007471936,0.0000028689556,0.0018174779,0.00032359385,0.000058758626,0.00009913584,0.0000020091243,0.04527578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99750143,0.00008767386,0.000040981406,0.00077563105,0.00018848375,0.0000016006061,0.0000031387958,0.000005715023,0.0013953606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921876,0.00010489351,0.00022710582,0.00007519255,0.00016300526,0.0002110691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999092,0.00015884082,0.00023762349,0.00006194927,0.00014344555,0.000306163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005935578,0.00007070573,0.00019629131,0.00004793152,0.00022014661,0.000053024312,0.00018686174,0.000044791712,0.000114253126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008715302,0.000055002478,0.00002459168,0.000081304766,0.00038108637,0.00017395614,0.000006724738,0.00012497713,3.8518237e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007616993,0.0000056775025,0.0128855,0.000008117791,0.00008439007,0.000031991385,0.03581,0.000001332955,0.000011849065,0.950082,0.0008441722,0.0001588146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029648363,0.00018017984,0.05026061,0.00026686335,0.0000989981,0.000068906265,0.024157777,0.00001871598,0.00033459414,0.4740893,0.44716546,0.00039376874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9515186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9942245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47599268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027959974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016365391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.290315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045801057","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.25.1.056","title":"The Supreme Court, Ameliorative Programs, and Disability: Not Getting It","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Supreme court; Humanities; Ethnology; Philosophy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.04075763082411048,"score_gpt":0.2789339670349551,"score_spread":0.2381763362108446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045801057","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61287034,0.009916002,0.000001700817,0.37143758,0.00061606005,0.0005252659,0.000012951544,0.000004696794,0.0046154256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98686594,0.001977837,0.00007477156,0.0023342483,0.0007294397,0.000041877665,8.2051446e-7,0.000015478392,0.007959594],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99724513,0.0007847545,0.000535715,0.00020751354,0.0002639314,0.00096294127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99697,0.0011141391,0.0004324691,0.00015556424,0.00034379942,0.000984025],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031170533,0.00024106322,0.0005151844,0.00002111445,0.0025246548,0.0010166997,0.000425166,0.00012680641,0.00013576023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067934237,0.00014127526,0.00014279308,0.00022118595,0.007483719,0.00061520113,0.00007363226,0.0006131428,0.000016628157],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055607794,0.000035675585,0.012668474,0.00008198548,0.0005205594,0.000031873016,0.49796802,0.000005946577,0.0000044206377,0.4234815,0.004398528,0.060747407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014195906,0.00027244075,0.011249785,0.00035022924,0.00013103112,0.00009431744,0.30823866,0.00012401743,0.0000044290728,0.09344471,0.58426255,0.00040821335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14092572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40658644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.579864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010005278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028767873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99877393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046394459","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.24.2.389","title":"Why Feminist Legal Scholars Should Write Judgments: Reflections on the Feminist Judgments Project in England and Wales","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Humanities; Redaction; Philosophy; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.07849090665921987,"score_gpt":0.32225329954721565,"score_spread":0.24376239288799578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046394459","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7707634,0.013063227,0.0000013655399,0.12165314,0.0019957065,0.00049553777,0.0001285937,0.0000068774925,0.09189213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96286577,0.0023591476,0.000033902925,0.022589732,0.0010714869,0.000028945366,0.0000025943998,0.000022590777,0.011025801],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972474,0.00081760966,0.00046984348,0.0002057522,0.00029668192,0.0009627136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819005,0.00043888754,0.0003127952,0.00019989035,0.00007850372,0.0007798986],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044021313,0.0002589725,0.00042396467,0.000052172094,0.0017240379,0.0006780943,0.00043492956,0.0002721722,0.00013810556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002410509,0.00017357455,0.00015347803,0.00048503536,0.0020567202,0.0006281664,0.000042528383,0.0012947695,0.000007297377],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009530096,0.00008716759,0.0062330696,0.000048540453,0.00020377767,0.000046199148,0.3220024,0.0000033124247,0.0000054125885,0.66168857,0.008519032,0.0010671951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013839857,0.00016210978,0.0007475783,0.00034353073,0.00007252329,0.0002589059,0.07247957,0.000003147127,0.000006559342,0.013722941,0.91060716,0.00021198881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018546427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18711299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9020881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008404693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005600024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049476288","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.26.1.51","title":"“It Happened More Than Once”: Freezing Deaths in Saskatchewan","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Scrutiny; Devaluation; Wright; Criminology; Law; Sociology; Harm; Legitimacy; History; Racism; Political science; Politics; Currency; Economics","score_opus":0.034234401763553295,"score_gpt":0.3272456883309905,"score_spread":0.2930112865674372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049476288","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97154,0.00048697685,0.000042241852,0.012177922,0.00042628872,0.0002199791,0.000012660705,0.0000067407736,0.015087242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99470717,0.000070718925,0.000048007656,0.0030448716,0.0004795631,0.000020825752,0.0000024724882,0.000026760756,0.0015996238],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997795,0.0006252857,0.00057269045,0.00013937612,0.00012344151,0.0007442031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981518,0.0005145401,0.0003148515,0.0002021071,0.0001081188,0.0007086137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002932929,0.00015438083,0.00070042844,0.00015169532,0.00059630006,0.00005596031,0.00033573827,0.000165535,0.00014930518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021714858,0.00011684834,0.00008903819,0.00016841451,0.00024522573,0.00017035352,0.000034364486,0.0007909194,0.000015014489],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010044303,0.000014352791,0.07930429,0.00013626053,0.00006446077,0.00009655323,0.7405667,0.000019477306,0.000011549889,0.1758317,0.00014285966,0.0037113877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00520248,0.00015799566,0.03696154,0.0011724861,0.000037257814,0.000015752044,0.7897873,0.00014361244,0.000014443813,0.121134266,0.045002356,0.0003705048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.066431366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87171316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8052818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004730018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009048688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93978536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050061770","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.26.1.81","title":"Legal Feminism and the Post-Racism Fantasy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Scholarship; Oppression; Feminism; Colonialism; Sociology; Gender studies; White (mutation); Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.020533839274851275,"score_gpt":0.29110096470236874,"score_spread":0.2705671254275175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050061770","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28755826,0.0003913925,0.000029947263,0.40487808,0.00073362084,0.00014885709,0.0000077960985,0.0000046645696,0.30624738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9784236,0.00011338797,0.00004222408,0.015405424,0.00047329091,0.0000059008726,0.0000010083926,0.000006807881,0.005528355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987801,0.00047961128,0.00024973543,0.00007921984,0.00012457628,0.0002867753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981263,0.0009125615,0.00024044616,0.00012344132,0.00018704262,0.0004102059],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047268127,0.000076059354,0.00019197109,0.00008125456,0.00093521056,0.0006148794,0.00025795176,0.000053455176,0.00015989784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012176675,0.00004770744,0.000049181603,0.00017771,0.0011091306,0.00049016427,0.000012366468,0.0004430247,0.000008291506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003761112,0.0000038137866,0.00013970323,0.0000032083392,0.000025623905,0.000004100695,0.097687185,7.54166e-7,0.0000010353683,0.89888054,0.00094463653,0.0022717745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012668401,0.000036194862,0.0011337778,0.00001750642,0.000024297007,0.0001462685,0.024698082,0.000013626659,0.0000015537222,0.13156807,0.84101284,0.000080926744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04332144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11355579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8400682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011747707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011203833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9630492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052970927","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.25.2.202","title":"Rhetoric and Reality: “Protecting” Women in Canadian Public Policy on Assisted Human Reproduction","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Reproduction; Reproductive technology; Agency (philosophy); Royal Commission; Rhetoric; Commission; Government (linguistics); Reproductive health; Human reproduction; Public administration; Rhetorical question; Bioethics; Welfare; Political science; Sociology; Law; Social science; Medicine; Biology; Population","score_opus":0.055187360343866745,"score_gpt":0.2990699769808534,"score_spread":0.24388261663698668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052970927","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8622973,0.00057093264,5.409337e-7,0.12859951,0.00014105845,0.00048551263,0.0000052087144,0.000013862916,0.007886077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99623024,0.00013774118,0.000020494708,0.0018061454,0.00041313682,0.00006597842,0.0000026101102,0.000020885083,0.0013027649],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979419,0.00018988225,0.00044001132,0.000307337,0.00011531364,0.0010055575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973224,0.000071994,0.00024020251,0.00044013036,0.00018794974,0.0017373227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033017856,0.00016128761,0.00049700064,0.0009886922,0.00038672538,0.00012687659,0.00014357879,0.00013256229,0.00004050999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023204477,0.00012214648,0.00004304848,0.0005236758,0.0003850085,0.00017642355,0.000016941123,0.00078869855,0.0000041500375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040703762,0.00011683326,0.110829346,0.0005496886,0.00036356808,0.00053365406,0.028566312,0.0000050636763,0.00027912995,0.7387682,0.0018544089,0.11772672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005040834,0.001552513,0.610412,0.00037002866,0.000024311528,0.0035209162,0.007956958,0.000013978953,0.00008471687,0.25446814,0.116161495,0.00039414185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.69508547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6499924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49958262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003052126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024514976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7981203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053005249","doi":"10.1353/jwl.2006.0010","title":"Sommes-nous dignes? L'egalite et l'arret Gosselin","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.022476020866127527,"score_gpt":0.2790292047019215,"score_spread":0.25655318383579395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053005249","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76413566,0.0029866416,0.000036210407,0.16367689,0.0006745091,0.00017048459,0.000029466059,0.000011457752,0.068278685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98577875,0.0005330728,0.00007431485,0.006961064,0.00089055096,0.000004771389,5.643029e-7,0.000010479466,0.0057464037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983091,0.0002890089,0.000320993,0.00014345073,0.0002752689,0.0006621788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99831843,0.00024759633,0.00031459244,0.0001332104,0.00010887538,0.0008772825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036529428,0.00012050369,0.00030437397,0.000058583573,0.00068693404,0.00039047538,0.0005342075,0.00008604892,0.00023038068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003618848,0.000092246715,0.00012367163,0.00027936074,0.0009067302,0.000525197,0.000019259303,0.00029944401,0.000016725275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026111518,0.000011560285,0.002084813,0.000005166764,0.000029371655,0.000037366553,0.18352129,0.000031634976,0.0000024032538,0.802974,0.004702449,0.0065738624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011243909,0.00007440237,0.0038140814,0.000064883985,0.000018230065,0.00005907792,0.028717756,0.00002688365,0.0000048838137,0.10124533,0.86463183,0.00021824751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09936623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6704768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8599294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052440475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001446292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9066312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054377323","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.25.2.284","title":"Of Surrogate Mother Born: Parentage Determinations in Canada and Elsewhere","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Certainty; Citizenship; Statutory law; Law; Political science; Best interests; Parental consent; Sociology; Informed consent; Medicine","score_opus":0.016592400537643482,"score_gpt":0.23713762352001166,"score_spread":0.22054522298236817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054377323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98133904,0.0012039421,0.0000015977735,0.0154831465,0.00007174357,0.00020747077,0.000012544231,0.0000019156876,0.0016785748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986152,0.0001785014,0.000053463544,0.0007049249,0.000028183364,0.000009663049,7.210933e-7,0.000008025428,0.00040131123],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927646,0.0000434861,0.00027380127,0.00008697155,0.000063861014,0.00025540372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992127,0.00008436302,0.00014794497,0.00014352797,0.000089486755,0.00032202448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037078845,0.000074049494,0.00030027982,0.00011726131,0.000045123743,0.000015238753,0.00008011569,0.000035392954,0.000064958636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015628566,0.000052181702,0.000022488672,0.00009951223,0.00021486709,0.00008359088,0.0000102982885,0.00020782492,4.72166e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018654033,0.000039011884,0.8817603,0.00049623183,0.00017844909,0.00047087416,0.010607057,0.000011625726,0.00015698136,0.06209225,0.0012129418,0.04278776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0051029683,0.0003952744,0.9080083,0.00041467897,0.00004668068,0.0012397711,0.013139451,0.00010306688,0.00033432155,0.05802755,0.012977979,0.00020999345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8368793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9722223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13534302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036039972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011923817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2127908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057559751","doi":"10.1353/jwl.2006.0007","title":"What Work of Feminist Legal Scholarship Over the Past Twenty Years Has Been Influential or Important to You, and Why?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Work (physics); Sociology; Political science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.023919845937612216,"score_gpt":0.25092780256722474,"score_spread":0.22700795662961254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057559751","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96614665,0.0019793583,0.0000011800862,0.028996987,0.00055746693,0.00017009859,0.00003242964,0.000002950072,0.002112909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889709,0.00038152642,0.000019188732,0.005145889,0.00062645663,0.000004217925,6.613228e-7,0.000012408506,0.0048387563],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868333,0.00017260888,0.00037140542,0.00012542824,0.0002210895,0.00042611876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847895,0.00011711717,0.00025155203,0.0001628241,0.000072179646,0.00091738184],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002090033,0.000097822805,0.0002747304,0.00023691439,0.00087477994,0.001711427,0.0003953435,0.00007897379,0.00033923727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017038801,0.00007966765,0.00009030798,0.00028024527,0.0014992454,0.0006252742,0.000029524343,0.00032876828,0.000005089559],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008907747,0.000056769255,0.033844795,0.00006861443,0.0004342021,0.0005568169,0.55087197,0.000041876447,0.000012263748,0.33993995,0.04018176,0.03310022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068701635,0.00005961107,0.022363562,0.0001141963,0.000039479233,0.000060165916,0.009200887,6.159481e-7,9.827407e-7,0.0024773397,0.96487796,0.00011818618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21304733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96569294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9246962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00074941956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016065587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058201937","doi":"10.1353/jwl.2006.0012","title":"Progres ou recul: reflexions sur l'accessibilite a la justice pour les victimes de harcelement sexuel au travail au Quebec","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.049266322214280026,"score_gpt":0.3299897541469109,"score_spread":0.2807234319326309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058201937","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73712707,0.015764892,0.00020155674,0.19864357,0.000983856,0.0003918756,0.000079673206,0.000020636728,0.046786845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9171286,0.001156794,0.0004977101,0.0022511822,0.0018808633,0.000024076784,0.000003071443,0.000029167226,0.07702854],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99673605,0.001033284,0.0006735481,0.0002540208,0.00027326285,0.0010298617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971429,0.00076815387,0.00048429522,0.00018498822,0.00035132235,0.0010683514],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004152543,0.00027390412,0.0005403713,0.0001583688,0.0014927372,0.00042807191,0.00045313986,0.00018592553,0.0003527125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045292688,0.0002226087,0.00015723567,0.00039369983,0.0017185158,0.00058763276,0.000041575382,0.00050823926,0.000016571474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020282785,0.0001556932,0.018797508,0.00021924634,0.0006092389,0.000102617414,0.5378003,0.00030260856,0.0000049271753,0.35338953,0.0069974125,0.08141806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024187327,0.00020622129,0.012727155,0.00040286552,0.00040332397,0.00017175607,0.17311148,0.0003475952,0.000011960022,0.012603357,0.79717505,0.0004205245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26331455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9215925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7901776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029225934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052037244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060088122","doi":"10.1353/jwl.2006.0018","title":"Causation, Common Sense, and the Common Law: Replacing Unexamined Assumptions with What We Know about Male Violence against Women or from Jane Doe to Bonnie Mooney","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Common sense; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Criminology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.02346392379539503,"score_gpt":0.2650374439093258,"score_spread":0.2415735201139308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060088122","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9365158,0.003026957,0.000003603269,0.056726158,0.00019142861,0.00040610897,0.000039320847,0.000009898485,0.0030806998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879313,0.003857748,0.000101738355,0.004730832,0.00032510114,0.000029427138,0.0000023235973,0.0000144571695,0.0030070567],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998062,0.00052208063,0.00039301845,0.00019870355,0.00025031247,0.000573896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99797237,0.0006177443,0.00031035894,0.00021149158,0.00015628332,0.0007317824],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015548853,0.00019130006,0.00050895434,0.00005209521,0.0016870261,0.00059519504,0.00026054418,0.000085317595,0.00007341282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018635282,0.000107388914,0.000060359165,0.00022802265,0.0012800919,0.0006107857,0.000056498437,0.00035200178,0.000005001887],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009345013,0.000042313124,0.010444852,0.000051083414,0.0004909516,0.0001614304,0.847995,0.00053589116,0.00003545086,0.120963655,0.0008797289,0.01746513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01572416,0.00047681626,0.05049434,0.0059866244,0.00030681703,0.00046842897,0.50294065,0.00032883268,0.00008942507,0.0456242,0.3761057,0.0014540174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.078237966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7861353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70789737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010935036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022746793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061392756","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.22.1.157","title":"Who Stands to Lose from Tax Cuts in Israel?","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.018046450697427115,"score_gpt":0.2494081363275807,"score_spread":0.23136168563015358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061392756","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9313218,0.0029227075,0.00004966586,0.042025834,0.0034350953,0.00019933522,0.0003075376,0.0000034051766,0.019734614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97500086,0.00072551344,0.0001746418,0.0058358223,0.0010410217,0.000004927069,0.0000030067094,0.000025712496,0.01718851],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99776375,0.00031635672,0.00052175194,0.00022792559,0.000231873,0.00093833474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99719256,0.00029568287,0.0002509834,0.00026213736,0.00018849243,0.0018101145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002345948,0.00022153709,0.0005668657,0.00020507773,0.000364347,0.0003119758,0.0006370758,0.0002525637,0.00032714478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026824084,0.00019628703,0.00012519966,0.00050447433,0.0009449595,0.00033554225,0.000037444115,0.00094693335,0.000027017219],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075365424,0.000032172728,0.04247994,0.000023138171,0.00009878581,0.00030319285,0.20787384,0.000055300712,0.000021609016,0.7436259,0.002214046,0.003196717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033364077,0.00026478618,0.049284544,0.0003556781,0.00008009141,0.000105359875,0.10912426,0.00025544773,0.000005917451,0.39192605,0.44468194,0.000579514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22499026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89767224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6726819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007185939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016071929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80043525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061958160","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.24.2.275","title":"Sexual Harassment: A Feminist Phrase That Transformed the Workplace","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harassment; Sociology; Humanities; Ethnology; Political science; Art; Law","score_opus":0.05091291529289937,"score_gpt":0.296504657829192,"score_spread":0.24559174253629262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061958160","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5945568,0.04945847,0.0001646122,0.2548674,0.005747888,0.0005999562,0.00012324238,0.00001350854,0.09446813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9573532,0.0010758393,0.000026825237,0.0060452567,0.0014692447,0.000016814398,0.0000019545048,0.000020662344,0.033990234],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99753344,0.0005866345,0.00041718583,0.00013496264,0.0002864277,0.0010413338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99763685,0.00063305086,0.00033782845,0.0001663069,0.0001043358,0.0011216357],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003963596,0.00022825002,0.00046509187,0.000079947495,0.001520246,0.0003201369,0.00043696145,0.0001360422,0.000465846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013632551,0.00014768488,0.0001246085,0.00038919013,0.0021139393,0.00050572894,0.000022777524,0.000520476,0.000026302021],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001246946,0.000048108028,0.011527915,0.000045870886,0.00040894022,0.000026251511,0.5354845,0.000019340476,7.516343e-7,0.4375741,0.00768846,0.0070510795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015779664,0.00011236887,0.0016368292,0.000096487194,0.00015550059,0.00017759221,0.21662362,0.000027462813,0.000003436603,0.008366687,0.7709961,0.00022594987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010650952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09367479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76330763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057713187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064923725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063902451","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.22.2.463","title":"Universally Particular: The Garneau Sisterhood's Challenge to the Rape Script","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Gender, Feminism, and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02985485712416939,"score_gpt":0.2489525848724144,"score_spread":0.219097727748245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063902451","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45535725,0.0082992185,0.000026642903,0.48152894,0.0075812954,0.0004256938,0.000027119677,0.000006123081,0.046747707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96762675,0.0011368726,0.000025008807,0.01029627,0.0018844354,0.000011413415,8.2759436e-7,0.000023027611,0.01899542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974091,0.00064704707,0.00040757505,0.00020588112,0.00030426588,0.0010261394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969769,0.00045203723,0.00028904562,0.0004202838,0.00018978005,0.0016719357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004610006,0.00022590651,0.00040168405,0.000079508085,0.0011437472,0.0003569222,0.0010954967,0.00017348446,0.00044863686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003358163,0.00013248033,0.00022935259,0.00031380964,0.0018637601,0.00022915765,0.000055746783,0.0010138217,0.000060405473],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042675507,0.000022199107,0.00019642666,0.00001892202,0.00016639961,0.00012799245,0.4388592,0.000015096308,0.000009263193,0.54526186,0.0051661436,0.010113811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008574689,0.00015872481,0.0009797378,0.000060513637,0.00011946129,0.00019299632,0.13662434,0.000019288073,0.0000060901048,0.039955944,0.82084996,0.00017549889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012073115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5957427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8156838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002802815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001595719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9945056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064373349","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.27.1.22","title":"Nouvelles normativités de la famille : la garde partagée au Québec, en France et en Belgique","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Social Policies and Family","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.018427221066733425,"score_gpt":0.27052095486556593,"score_spread":0.2520937337988325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064373349","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70640504,0.011319128,0.000058461887,0.14520882,0.00093257794,0.00017837311,0.00008459745,0.000009057896,0.13580397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9703199,0.0029093672,0.000074237025,0.008076258,0.0010606028,0.000010448713,0.0000011458966,0.000027304697,0.017520683],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957476,0.0026645877,0.00040230012,0.00013512743,0.0002125849,0.0008377585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962444,0.0017129516,0.00030539223,0.00015097004,0.00012477035,0.0014615179],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069019655,0.00021380499,0.0005139593,0.00008176885,0.00054499693,0.0002576602,0.00050591043,0.0003124494,0.00007265433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071547535,0.00018483242,0.00017613919,0.00019207773,0.001906347,0.00029454866,0.00004331526,0.000769692,0.000023350054],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029458919,0.000020977046,0.0044110217,0.00002748453,0.00011092322,0.000091586284,0.6036907,0.00007291902,0.000001594864,0.38107097,0.0075696786,0.0029027152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012876269,0.00010689363,0.011979955,0.00015604304,0.00004643685,0.00016179666,0.104250655,0.000046100988,0.0000024833632,0.06101397,0.8207148,0.00023329673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7300187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81138587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81314504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018035406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009293168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065169972","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.22.1.169","title":"A Feminist Perspective on Carbon Taxes","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.042909415949248984,"score_gpt":0.24201688133912097,"score_spread":0.19910746538987198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065169972","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7250726,0.0067249294,0.000002177783,0.073607646,0.003900318,0.00015014512,0.00084412866,0.0000029117255,0.18969513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814856,0.0014981696,0.000050289214,0.00609095,0.0014346602,0.000010343627,0.0000026557905,0.00004282815,0.009384492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815345,0.000048998823,0.0007059195,0.000273736,0.000027911514,0.0007899627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977373,0.00031312913,0.00074096356,0.0003320611,0.000062742896,0.0008138044],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001988126,0.00024760282,0.0007744053,0.00033405365,0.00028154795,0.00035130256,0.00040756736,0.00023223367,0.0005792728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003754888,0.0002614165,0.0002252365,0.00014284879,0.0009251669,0.0001541528,0.000034293324,0.0010033263,0.00007109578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100453944,0.000029745535,0.0025501621,0.00004296281,0.00016898292,0.00006653669,0.04132723,0.000015326736,0.0000013476484,0.9546731,0.0005950695,0.00042904436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024224515,0.00036923253,0.0012997683,0.00014314242,0.00003635893,0.0007145111,0.0112692285,0.0004365286,0.000013707837,0.6256081,0.3572748,0.0004121999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050203588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25047985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3566797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011070363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027072185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066806600","doi":"10.1353/jwl.2006.0005","title":"Les femmes juges feront-elles veritablement une difference? Reflexions sur leur presence depuis vingt ans a la Cour supreme du Canada","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.03423380441760103,"score_gpt":0.2629472056405966,"score_spread":0.22871340122299555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066806600","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7446122,0.020533465,0.0000125798215,0.21717311,0.0010412865,0.000255903,0.00023196587,0.0000100971365,0.016129369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94877076,0.007013884,0.00009506306,0.002755517,0.001094223,0.00001681246,0.0000057440084,0.000027451146,0.040220555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967354,0.0007381858,0.0006172538,0.00029349246,0.0004600281,0.0011556239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997007,0.00070252543,0.00041274424,0.00026043743,0.0002959787,0.0013213182],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018000217,0.00034623456,0.0006485655,0.000027964063,0.0016279595,0.00042861782,0.00086159084,0.00025681398,0.000523875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022988065,0.0002770505,0.00021600061,0.00035981517,0.0018019616,0.0004365648,0.00006367532,0.0007718988,0.0000044804924],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008023945,0.0000772665,0.006514858,0.000119540695,0.0004222726,0.00023429575,0.18100788,0.0002603394,0.0000110458195,0.7796466,0.025294412,0.0063312817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001530169,0.00013313755,0.0040245117,0.00044975575,0.00014650424,0.000272465,0.06280082,0.000102107544,0.000016439399,0.02812097,0.90195924,0.0004438608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8967669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8766649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019186648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037448886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070624944","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.23.2.548","title":"L'engagement de ne pas troubler l'ordre public dans les causes de violence conjugale ayant fait l'objet d'un abandon des poursuites judiciaires criminelles (art. 810 C.CR.)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminology; Criminal code; Political science; Order (exchange); Public defender; Criminal law; Sociology; Psychology; Criminal justice","score_opus":0.07840102207439557,"score_gpt":0.28250592573735256,"score_spread":0.20410490366295697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070624944","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9493117,0.0019945619,0.00031620346,0.0018224301,0.00019398938,0.0002083143,0.00003181591,0.000019044854,0.04610194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949386,0.0023536049,0.00051206746,0.0015552501,0.00023453136,0.00002572553,0.000002790559,0.00002495192,0.00035245216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973622,0.00063582987,0.00044497053,0.00021335503,0.00022391944,0.0011197275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980084,0.00026864934,0.00028929047,0.00020451353,0.00022787438,0.0010013104],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034841315,0.00022890083,0.0004253823,0.00017801738,0.0013203726,0.00034165088,0.00067831774,0.00011689791,0.0004678376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038457775,0.00018235452,0.00014567404,0.00021188411,0.0016868486,0.0004267999,0.00004530148,0.00040489592,0.000009409865],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011751939,0.00006822467,0.076685295,0.000051031726,0.00017966208,0.00020026561,0.20360899,0.000014360004,0.00017331277,0.7142785,0.000795451,0.003827357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004856438,0.00064898236,0.28196213,0.001411423,0.00037046484,0.0005003431,0.29399127,0.00012579898,0.0018838053,0.37135705,0.041725285,0.0011669915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08079703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16286491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34292147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006789023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001277726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072273330","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.24.1.082","title":"Discrimination systémique et intersectionnalité : la déqualification des immigrantes à Montréal","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Unemployment; Sociology; Demographic economics; Political science; Economics; Economic growth; Law","score_opus":0.08865915779065758,"score_gpt":0.34375687341624067,"score_spread":0.2550977156255831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072273330","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9728817,0.0011605156,0.00047721816,0.017587585,0.0003713497,0.00016563958,0.000016113252,0.000009602906,0.007330328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949374,0.00021357332,0.000074720105,0.002170335,0.00033542112,0.0000099380795,0.000005166411,0.000009998102,0.0022434094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835306,0.00077105034,0.00029524765,0.00007620029,0.00012605955,0.00037837212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987142,0.00025758913,0.000223426,0.00009037039,0.00021462078,0.00049979467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031900248,0.000095726224,0.00017386382,0.00010002043,0.0004282055,0.00021314107,0.00015390843,0.00007111564,0.000037887567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004850238,0.000071161194,0.00007474781,0.00008936726,0.00077288836,0.0006355404,0.00000771447,0.00017673871,0.000004264197],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013040171,0.000009088212,0.0022340952,0.0000160714,0.00003073883,0.0000016824591,0.38638845,0.000005449786,0.000019999261,0.6106471,0.00029764517,0.00033662326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001664786,0.00008996145,0.122832656,0.00029545074,0.00011625223,0.00035174182,0.62980074,0.00008590297,0.0001351758,0.06705749,0.17716262,0.00040724763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15009241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5027239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5435896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011547367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045287036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8555672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073405365","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.22.2.485","title":"The Québec <i>Crime Victims Compensation Act</i>: When the Clock Is Ticking against Victims of Intra-Familial Sexual Abuse","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sexual abuse; Humanities; Ethnology; Art; Sociology; Poison control; Medicine; Medical emergency; Suicide prevention","score_opus":0.020846689618878037,"score_gpt":0.25139539734196376,"score_spread":0.23054870772308572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073405365","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86958605,0.004458662,0.0000046784808,0.11576428,0.0025869152,0.00037381434,0.000040225605,0.0000064091982,0.007178958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886718,0.0011399767,0.000049461778,0.0042001875,0.0014510412,0.000010326265,0.000001390266,0.000023450903,0.0044523943],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972253,0.00062204583,0.00072184805,0.00020410551,0.0003954207,0.0008312931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99642605,0.0013968244,0.0007664069,0.0002872633,0.00042041743,0.0007030288],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032361152,0.0002776856,0.00055052416,0.000047181784,0.0026501496,0.00041302285,0.00089905603,0.00019830026,0.00017823726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005847083,0.00015619044,0.00019860196,0.00024507084,0.004245002,0.0004073025,0.0000585033,0.0011632927,0.000015836345],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000106370426,0.000028496057,0.0028736917,0.0000432275,0.00051807374,0.000021965709,0.8337016,0.00003500999,0.00016351437,0.14780225,0.002950746,0.011755009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020545924,0.00022214906,0.0073779514,0.00019220078,0.0002464401,0.00010100217,0.189829,0.00030419423,0.00008702588,0.014305407,0.784851,0.00042901517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32889104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8564418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7819003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007880808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013149347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076488515","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.25.1.128","title":"“I Wish the Supreme Court Thought More Like Dianne”: A Comment on <i>Krangle v Brisco</i>","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Wish; Political science; Art; Ethnology; Sociology; Literature","score_opus":0.020587774562238485,"score_gpt":0.2452920658503334,"score_spread":0.2247042912880949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076488515","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18125315,0.01940836,0.000011314075,0.74616104,0.0029204537,0.00066809467,0.000066768596,0.0000084753465,0.049502343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92055804,0.0010303376,0.0000101168125,0.055509638,0.0020524124,0.000032573542,0.0000016312144,0.000030790976,0.02077448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971382,0.0006495401,0.00060438644,0.0002166912,0.0003878929,0.0010033106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971424,0.0005541542,0.00049454474,0.0002881313,0.00028928608,0.0012315316],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027468272,0.00027398005,0.00061779894,0.0000782421,0.0013014106,0.00082851684,0.00081665284,0.00017369982,0.0004741296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016971483,0.0001755544,0.00022168757,0.00039148252,0.0020091513,0.00059931347,0.000043559146,0.0007328069,0.000088941735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006659957,0.000067685105,0.00085529214,0.00011960411,0.00031717113,0.00012844033,0.14208242,0.00004822359,0.0000025835616,0.5627103,0.28964108,0.0039606164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001071333,0.0002352299,0.00045232158,0.00048018247,0.0000721802,0.00012891281,0.024885334,0.000034966055,0.000005683622,0.055313338,0.91708314,0.00023737446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.313484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29701865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7393049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006897146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009902888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076872046","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.25.2.221","title":"“Tony Danza Is My Sperm Donor?”: Queer Kinship and the Impact of Canadian Regulations around Sperm Donation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lesbian; Sperm donation; Queer; Legislation; Kinship; Donation; Sperm; Law reform; Sociology; Political science; Gender studies; Law; Biology; Genetics","score_opus":0.03615754962545342,"score_gpt":0.2773476550423255,"score_spread":0.24119010541687208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076872046","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90872866,0.0016884157,0.000005491058,0.08149124,0.00010553528,0.00049600186,0.000030602805,0.0000052134833,0.0074488604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964573,0.0004326436,0.000076863544,0.0017930659,0.00018481596,0.0000145161475,0.0000043797613,0.00001612279,0.0010203203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987648,0.000098095836,0.00040954558,0.00016022698,0.000116605144,0.00045068844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981127,0.00017228017,0.00026796968,0.00035358215,0.0002808467,0.000812622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011563028,0.0001508771,0.00045772086,0.00051745947,0.0002529103,0.000094140254,0.00017275158,0.000105773426,0.00016134664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035668438,0.00008591773,0.000118204545,0.00034950097,0.0009274786,0.00020939042,0.000014376314,0.0004008599,0.0000043840146],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008162715,0.00004664651,0.13012287,0.00022845888,0.0009912278,0.00010363808,0.05161442,0.00011595324,0.00016309641,0.7938654,0.009798874,0.012133158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0068457536,0.00049808266,0.6636314,0.00024591046,0.00013406521,0.0018839036,0.008343167,0.00032399592,0.000099230325,0.30480266,0.0129444515,0.00024740078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55401045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3380897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53350854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058699545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012821866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67398846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077191540","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.21.1.35","title":"<i>High</i>: Marijuana, Women, and the Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Crime, Deviance, and Social Control","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"White (mutation); Criminology; Sociology; Gender studies; Criminal law; Feature (linguistics); Focus (optics); Political science; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.014786713359259665,"score_gpt":0.2481995382418119,"score_spread":0.23341282488255224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077191540","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7502504,0.0048378776,0.000017807053,0.10656032,0.0007385555,0.00041922132,0.000021721513,0.000013651673,0.13714044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97860897,0.00062453473,0.000014551869,0.01666172,0.0007417964,0.000008790617,5.4725206e-7,0.000010144906,0.003328972],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981265,0.000488083,0.00033908073,0.00013935186,0.00020344832,0.0007035159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982606,0.00040771597,0.00023024337,0.00016291745,0.00011891466,0.0008196166],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038490666,0.00014629927,0.0005046032,0.00006279575,0.0013352919,0.000461395,0.00041174502,0.00009769092,0.00011280651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021218255,0.00009697293,0.00011730841,0.00018551676,0.0018003151,0.00026570572,0.0000138669775,0.00038653897,0.0000050853832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013245257,0.0000058384094,0.00010172262,0.0000045937118,0.000053326123,0.000034972276,0.13473642,0.0000015561448,0.0000012347211,0.8613342,0.00049898424,0.003094686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004003587,0.0001087808,0.0009672954,0.000037691647,0.000038763625,0.000039951043,0.033350646,0.000006867267,0.0000012079602,0.6931642,0.26809925,0.0001817307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04142915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2487296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26760027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003703667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005500007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083640649","doi":"10.1353/jwl.2006.0019","title":"The Promise of Brooks v. Canada Safeway Ltd : Those Who Bear Children Should Not Be Disadvantaged","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Geography; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.029629888095780432,"score_gpt":0.27190350239811306,"score_spread":0.24227361430233263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083640649","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6680025,0.019129312,8.1137773e-7,0.30153608,0.00077579496,0.0004763496,0.00021012664,0.0000038822004,0.009865196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9647676,0.0030087633,0.0000395359,0.0038211579,0.00094913156,0.000011502851,0.000002083839,0.00002443844,0.02737583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968315,0.0006616325,0.00073098025,0.00021482918,0.00049339706,0.0010676981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969585,0.0007896994,0.00063037773,0.0002434328,0.0002527281,0.0011252816],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025838714,0.0002996853,0.0007191734,0.000041085525,0.0019894412,0.00022503556,0.00081458286,0.00014741985,0.0001326044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005548796,0.00018807812,0.00022539771,0.00023772764,0.002873705,0.00034453726,0.000069431815,0.0007816709,0.0000036531565],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003555576,0.000062838095,0.0065854965,0.00011534411,0.0014820631,0.00010809022,0.39051044,0.00022727487,0.000020656002,0.5398244,0.021716088,0.03899175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026480537,0.00017239271,0.019957684,0.00046701683,0.00022569655,0.000121448495,0.04296055,0.00003919714,0.00008565383,0.0057852697,0.92703575,0.0005013156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8754819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99480027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90531963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021613005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020635275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084259912","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.22.1.241","title":"Budget 2010 and the Universal Child Care Benefit: An Inquiry into the Gendered Nature of Childcare in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Child care; Art; Medicine","score_opus":0.009506277630801509,"score_gpt":0.22152288642231355,"score_spread":0.21201660879151205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084259912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9356032,0.019697582,0.0000017133702,0.037356757,0.003230438,0.0002792144,0.00013784507,0.0000017600269,0.0036914952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938256,0.002045484,0.000026643625,0.003046402,0.00055074366,0.000003111971,0.0000073400993,0.00002098817,0.0004736922],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800825,0.0004406819,0.0004275381,0.00021075015,0.00026740239,0.0006453575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802625,0.00026964728,0.0003633047,0.00034846217,0.00025824874,0.0007340558],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016168073,0.00023527653,0.0005098913,0.000106805215,0.00085516786,0.00014773117,0.00087992236,0.00029123228,0.00004606933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012099312,0.00014904527,0.00010383432,0.00037909488,0.0028746808,0.00027209494,0.00005737941,0.0018707485,3.1322875e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007489002,0.000007837528,0.017771363,0.000041527954,0.0001013392,0.000050291554,0.5190909,0.00011450197,0.0000012086932,0.4601941,0.00011926034,0.0024327848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036355879,0.000095389696,0.10299015,0.0001390642,0.00011475475,0.00020498896,0.8064742,0.00019036591,0.000001941156,0.053179793,0.032667086,0.00030666852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9556414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4070143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007672513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038080253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086301890","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.21.2.267","title":"Global Distributive Justice: The Potential for a Feminist Analysis of International Tax Revenue Allocation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Tax revenue; Public economics; Tax reform; Scholarship; Economics; Double taxation; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Law; Accounting","score_opus":0.015324835057127137,"score_gpt":0.28168090878942564,"score_spread":0.2663560737322985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086301890","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.951674,0.00052602374,0.0062268847,0.030639414,0.00093922333,0.00029185085,0.0020630006,0.0000032101525,0.0076363836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99782413,0.00013288461,0.0000708902,0.0010774476,0.00026963864,0.000003537138,0.00002011408,0.000002741136,0.000598643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912274,0.00012376242,0.00026463703,0.00008507471,0.00015426661,0.00024952742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899334,0.00011990194,0.00029922428,0.000097946046,0.0002655504,0.00022404613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014567839,0.00007072602,0.00022382985,0.00007142112,0.00039853886,0.00011726897,0.00037364455,0.000055181637,0.000014173951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002686317,0.000051595216,0.00014989781,0.0003688483,0.0003863343,0.00008658919,0.000008025428,0.00009536408,2.574196e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000103905266,0.00002085373,0.005178963,0.000007991559,0.0005927784,0.000009849719,0.039481215,0.00071940187,0.0000035751168,0.9516989,0.000978309,0.0012042811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034163056,0.00034752736,0.29217443,0.00009172361,0.0031284168,0.00006720195,0.16820592,0.005195179,0.0000027758147,0.46170095,0.06527719,0.0003923915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070290365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12954146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48999792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004161918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055335404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99958324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087763328","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.25.1.001","title":"Une analyse de la réglementation des personnes itinérantes selon une perspective pothienne de la discrimination","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Context (archaeology); Power (physics); Political science; Law; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.028037944334675276,"score_gpt":0.35343272136118103,"score_spread":0.32539477702650577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087763328","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9790654,0.00061779853,0.00016300863,0.007342743,0.00007813101,0.00021233533,0.000015096494,0.0000080497175,0.012497402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981979,0.0003374478,0.00019826028,0.00046076693,0.00025522595,0.000043140368,0.0000039158203,0.000020063866,0.00048325138],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775976,0.0012594692,0.00031003036,0.000102747224,0.000087816894,0.00048020147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99806434,0.00087928015,0.00026338242,0.00008145134,0.00028339276,0.00042812756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022354226,0.00011839718,0.00034800498,0.00015345712,0.000969921,0.000121823374,0.0001454129,0.000120673445,0.00021262119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000331186,0.00009034145,0.000076699536,0.00026018528,0.00057174545,0.00029778184,0.000012728034,0.00044277604,0.000008224025],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003260298,0.000017100356,0.02681735,0.00008295132,0.00009097112,0.000029022485,0.7159928,0.000013754935,0.00009737123,0.25554454,0.00005540425,0.0012261455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010263866,0.000050643266,0.09104588,0.00017079481,0.00005002635,0.000013536578,0.67177606,0.00010001191,0.000016622907,0.23542976,0.00023876845,0.00008150239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28453705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39003652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10549949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010483274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005516343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7459946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088124345","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.23.2.661","title":"Pensions, Privatization, and Poverty: The Gendered Impact","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Retirement, Disability, and Employment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.18585133401355308,"score_gpt":0.3433564838079058,"score_spread":0.1575051497943527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088124345","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9066953,0.009095706,0.000024031713,0.057143584,0.00093223806,0.00037012354,0.000032720836,0.0000039131064,0.025702361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99009466,0.0023644657,0.000029958652,0.0037128713,0.00031498948,0.000005233324,0.0000013448572,0.000015152962,0.0034613062],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980338,0.0005909699,0.00042287406,0.00015746335,0.00019300834,0.000601858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815696,0.00021875324,0.00030875692,0.00023033626,0.00015101125,0.00093417324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028307538,0.00017209732,0.00033898992,0.0000587847,0.00085673557,0.00021696962,0.00036149364,0.00009671281,0.00081256847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027664928,0.000105798725,0.000127059,0.00021485872,0.0018160885,0.0003125126,0.000037497197,0.00027983653,0.0000074303625],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007083533,0.00003704669,0.05646337,0.00004551676,0.0002311184,0.00002549736,0.25234908,0.0000058430346,0.0000018086171,0.6832208,0.0044012107,0.0031478724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021875736,0.0004507223,0.11545069,0.00024582908,0.00021150195,0.00028086817,0.057654645,0.00007641004,0.000008223869,0.6772906,0.14575645,0.00038647262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06506117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13114221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19469444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059665187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008624193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9411647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090383260","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.22.2.301","title":"Let Me Tell You a Story: English-Canadian Newspapers and Sexual Assault Myths","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Gender, Feminism, and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Sexual assault; Victimisation; Ethnology; Political science; Criminology; Art; Psychology; Poison control; Sociology; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.020032261555769676,"score_gpt":0.23938859597311238,"score_spread":0.2193563344173427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090383260","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.837665,0.0072026644,0.0000019575573,0.064320736,0.006938361,0.0002811422,0.00013694068,0.0000084498715,0.0834447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95275444,0.00094276783,0.000070794966,0.005411485,0.0028302148,0.0000075028856,0.0000043545833,0.000038821552,0.037939608],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969424,0.0005126016,0.0004463451,0.00031854116,0.00032366114,0.0014564672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99346125,0.00041376284,0.00033115863,0.0002848515,0.00028967197,0.0052193208],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00472533,0.00032238846,0.00063693715,0.00026957408,0.0010345604,0.00042178505,0.0005841193,0.00046302838,0.00066929706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008573939,0.0002880619,0.00013385742,0.00029850178,0.002638786,0.00046679174,0.000028163015,0.0017613274,0.000023481727],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046232988,0.000021571152,0.0027982695,0.00006576632,0.0002399077,0.0003808763,0.7220478,0.000004812167,0.000032509288,0.24491873,0.010902413,0.018541103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014606866,0.00017042307,0.0010774891,0.000055934594,0.00010167019,0.00030353223,0.20800865,0.000012172898,0.0000038333824,0.0077019446,0.780795,0.00030871193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30418876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9638701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7698926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068270246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052975933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092462314","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.26.2.03","title":"Self-Determination and Indigenous Women: Increasing Legitimacy through Inclusion","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Legitimacy; Inclusion (mineral); Self-determination; Politics; Political science; Relevance (law); Gender studies; Resistance (ecology); Sociology; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.01267717723533467,"score_gpt":0.26567028984389823,"score_spread":0.25299311260856355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092462314","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9449929,0.0005696473,0.000029799034,0.0025973576,0.00040951383,0.00027231273,0.0000036038166,0.000009940511,0.051114902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950226,0.0020972816,0.00027769225,0.000909118,0.0006855414,0.000002926321,0.0000015684013,0.000013280798,0.0009899787],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809855,0.00067019067,0.00030798485,0.00012615851,0.00017565406,0.0006214848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99842083,0.00035442223,0.00029125754,0.000112985814,0.00016118295,0.00065928936],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050484524,0.00011195808,0.0002719075,0.0001330555,0.007256664,0.00021589051,0.00023421671,0.000100042926,0.00003277081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050783983,0.0000845217,0.000036575766,0.0001522313,0.00045994448,0.00046655166,0.000006249588,0.00023484037,0.0000026767614],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020735533,0.000011905666,0.00028578506,0.000036082896,0.000013222431,0.000007268034,0.72532535,8.410824e-7,3.6036403e-7,0.2732145,0.0000049690843,0.0010790302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012001339,0.00022283134,0.00095168006,0.00010621334,0.00002326059,0.00026167525,0.040381968,0.000044723558,0.000006903394,0.23595512,0.7206323,0.0002131511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22531788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.76976204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72062737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011055125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006303047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111591388","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.21.2.353","title":"“We-Sisters” and the Rights of Women to Equality: Analysis of Dissenting Opinions Surrounding the Enactment of Bill 63 Amending the <i>Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms</i>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Charter; Law; Political science; Politics; Human rights; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Commission; Dissent; Gender studies","score_opus":0.025655351986993542,"score_gpt":0.2726229478476195,"score_spread":0.24696759586062594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111591388","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9849533,0.0006601974,0.0000090763715,0.0107561685,0.000129481,0.0002339514,0.000077177676,0.0000014334021,0.0031792293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986001,0.0000904438,0.000008485602,0.00028910444,0.00008185046,0.000004609428,0.0000012245064,0.000004869333,0.0009193135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981237,0.0004987354,0.00061263604,0.00012820675,0.00025097263,0.00038572398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979183,0.0006623595,0.00068245106,0.00024300031,0.00010368362,0.00039022145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00420637,0.000112732945,0.0006231596,0.00046944406,0.0012544133,0.00018431107,0.0004112601,0.000048217586,0.00005867398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009019056,0.00005782853,0.00018555882,0.00053736934,0.0022415868,0.00017084766,0.000029670668,0.00017858502,1.2894567e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066641835,0.000019528426,0.0006356693,0.000033518176,0.0006383421,0.0000046652626,0.45163924,0.000016781401,0.00006825003,0.54631925,0.0002068276,0.0003513329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0061571556,0.0007433196,0.01971916,0.0010645025,0.0022592295,0.00005481699,0.2658589,0.00010570943,0.0001638817,0.5323338,0.17085852,0.0006810077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41424167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85107225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4368306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053096976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022971063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.964806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124257432","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.22.2.329","title":"Negotiating Sex: The Legal Construct of Consent in Cases of Wife Rape in Ontario, Canada","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Wife; Ethnology; Political science; Sociology; Art; Law","score_opus":0.03455471204583089,"score_gpt":0.2667251686062037,"score_spread":0.23217045656037283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124257432","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9708685,0.0020512703,0.0000012959142,0.01509795,0.0016552506,0.0001513972,0.000030962023,6.370153e-7,0.0101427315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99666905,0.00012780057,0.000025555904,0.0007094994,0.00012139807,0.00000278212,6.990656e-7,0.000006677694,0.002336532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831283,0.00034378626,0.0006391139,0.000099539284,0.00018760355,0.00041711528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976651,0.0012730823,0.0005076561,0.00010955987,0.00016514878,0.00027941848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018130875,0.00012528365,0.00050344446,0.00010046155,0.00023822418,0.000058031295,0.00025650792,0.000076891316,0.00022702583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048951065,0.00009193461,0.00005313216,0.00029996992,0.0017735501,0.00014742832,0.000022979255,0.0005948867,1.953583e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008344418,0.000028048218,0.2903811,0.000056194625,0.00016816861,0.00024370797,0.19505168,0.00062220526,0.000010171864,0.5111422,0.0009858885,0.0012271745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0065161646,0.00034405052,0.0911259,0.0007240009,0.0001447597,0.0010772615,0.6050109,0.0004095258,0.00005468418,0.023639416,0.27037406,0.0005792319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99810296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99997365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4875028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056062883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007542239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99808407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125884035","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.22.1.027","title":"Women, Substantive Equality, and Fiscal Policy: Gender-Based Analysis of Taxes, Benefits, and Budgets","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Gender equality; Sociology; Art; Gender studies","score_opus":0.0390689647909661,"score_gpt":0.2741626466090408,"score_spread":0.23509368181807472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125884035","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.975631,0.008108218,0.000053805376,0.011942054,0.000571655,0.00015874278,0.00081130455,0.0000035211222,0.0027196712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942739,0.0023881972,0.00009974245,0.0018449965,0.00031144786,0.0000047250123,0.0000066855223,0.00002079008,0.0010494982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99742335,0.00046831116,0.0006307328,0.0002747972,0.00027477863,0.0009280108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968656,0.0005072723,0.0005597437,0.00022332094,0.00024270531,0.0016014117],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034323551,0.00026812742,0.0009223325,0.0005376944,0.00051905384,0.00023415254,0.00034505842,0.00027080503,0.0001034517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024990528,0.00023487247,0.00018338407,0.0010748279,0.0027625714,0.0002547056,0.000044300334,0.00060328934,7.595223e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007361301,0.000040272855,0.06936146,0.00009278748,0.0010545383,0.00003341115,0.15159419,0.000099208126,0.000017646826,0.7741616,0.00005302391,0.003418277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0065535414,0.00067840016,0.5143451,0.00023023537,0.0020567721,0.00017737164,0.15517947,0.00361418,0.000016579166,0.2832831,0.03269876,0.0011664939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056303274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5239407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49087846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004171475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012293055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128594652","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.22.2.435","title":"The Sexual Assault of Intoxicated Women","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Humanities; Sexual assault; Political science; Philosophy; Poison control; Medicine; Suicide prevention; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.01572354098577717,"score_gpt":0.25762219054198343,"score_spread":0.24189864955620627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128594652","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9086819,0.010143012,0.0000018661923,0.056724787,0.00303602,0.00014411494,0.0000114311815,0.0000043918226,0.02125247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.960106,0.0014798135,0.00002193811,0.0007742704,0.0007735137,0.0000053448093,7.9348297e-7,0.000018794039,0.036819518],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997656,0.00049454474,0.0005667117,0.00014267927,0.00025455272,0.00088551256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99715984,0.0006804016,0.00051647937,0.0002507185,0.00028326633,0.0011092682],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052421256,0.00017781001,0.00047982376,0.00009626267,0.00093735335,0.00024703366,0.00074193906,0.00032981404,0.00049151195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004626362,0.00011200402,0.0001075038,0.00043882214,0.0038634902,0.00020539516,0.000031549156,0.0013058143,0.000019225867],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000111003144,0.000032199747,0.0009267165,0.000032889082,0.0004387333,0.000071598384,0.44536301,0.000014546017,0.00007297226,0.5308004,0.002155513,0.019980436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001258276,0.0002645671,0.00069466943,0.00010872086,0.00006519635,0.00017867908,0.13588281,0.000044580265,0.000040334955,0.14692886,0.7143306,0.00020266183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026821421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.119020216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71217513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034190938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012263309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133808670","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.21.1.55","title":"Penguins and Polyamory: Using Law and Film to Explore the Essence of Marriage in Canadian Family Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Legalization; Context (archaeology); Family law; Sociology; Popularity; Law; Sodomy; Value (mathematics); Gender studies; Criminology; Political science; History; Homosexuality","score_opus":0.054451489957730026,"score_gpt":0.29393273377880597,"score_spread":0.23948124382107594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133808670","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9520561,0.001628658,0.000001236824,0.02636313,0.00011019646,0.0002427785,0.000021695148,0.00000228638,0.019573936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99243987,0.00017121808,0.00004270323,0.007046995,0.00012297704,0.0000032421453,3.345003e-7,0.000006608988,0.0001660462],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986874,0.00021719265,0.00026126442,0.00012859507,0.00013795425,0.0005675851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986025,0.00017746854,0.000129668,0.000099875964,0.0000884884,0.00090199057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013734002,0.00012571957,0.00033337268,0.00007102483,0.00096795394,0.00018096951,0.0002605744,0.00006515022,0.000014229881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016981122,0.0000841681,0.00004148625,0.000193461,0.0010636701,0.00023249404,0.000022899363,0.00023877577,5.096686e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025031848,0.0000046661266,0.0026029819,0.000012290498,0.000032852764,0.00007167536,0.2000564,0.000022419861,0.000050723724,0.7966103,0.00014494573,0.00036573436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003564915,0.0004547763,0.126897,0.0008303515,0.00012826265,0.00017055123,0.51802135,0.00014077344,0.000054690914,0.16764052,0.18116547,0.00093133486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91508394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9883504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6289697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005027787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037099657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7444817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134709509","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.22.1.129","title":"The Fiscal Equality of Women: Proposed Changes to Legislation Governing Private Pension Plans in Alberta, British Columbia, Ontario, and Nova Scotia","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Nova scotia; Private pension; Pension; Humanities; Ethnology; Sociology; Art; Law","score_opus":0.02209024727789921,"score_gpt":0.24867025096218207,"score_spread":0.22658000368428285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134709509","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.939331,0.00055917504,0.0000029848104,0.055377427,0.0012594326,0.0002860169,0.00004221119,0.0000012011708,0.0031405275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869605,0.00025472097,0.000030088344,0.0010058007,0.00027726335,0.000003310892,7.6397396e-7,0.00000829003,0.011459265],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808687,0.00028799422,0.00040305406,0.00018665355,0.00029103592,0.00074438204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981544,0.00044240686,0.00048642585,0.00012247708,0.00010082276,0.0006934524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004490212,0.00010697674,0.00037928906,0.000028396804,0.0005885223,0.00059136655,0.0003686185,0.00013179821,0.00028623617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056935113,0.00010518342,0.00004955673,0.0003331692,0.0014293918,0.00031721595,0.000044489043,0.0005037496,0.0000023464486],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013298847,0.00004111105,0.30959117,0.00005315467,0.00006779001,0.0000567104,0.5204418,0.000016594544,0.000056736375,0.13633217,0.0016062206,0.031603556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015056803,0.000355924,0.53267425,0.00038701555,0.00002222731,0.00009952057,0.023813996,0.00004081462,0.00000505413,0.043188985,0.39762256,0.0002839705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9920113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49662778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009992935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011391838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5702562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138032363","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.23.2.488","title":"A Human Right to Group Self-Identification? Reflections on <i>Nixon v. Vancouver Rape Relief</i>","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Ethnology; Sociology","score_opus":0.03096918800383353,"score_gpt":0.25453497422966115,"score_spread":0.22356578622582762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138032363","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21439251,0.0051686266,0.000046108493,0.03851024,0.012028422,0.00075609935,0.0001555796,0.00003465038,0.72890776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8358516,0.00049190107,0.000102808095,0.006510087,0.0010989041,0.000023735392,0.0000017016159,0.000030644253,0.1558886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978324,0.00042321993,0.00056140794,0.0002542172,0.00022625797,0.0007024993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99727064,0.00009014847,0.00039204597,0.00031138427,0.00018355751,0.0017521986],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020636143,0.00018181102,0.00038863393,0.00068362313,0.0024279766,0.00050299685,0.00053682685,0.00017046777,0.0017172087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000079079,0.0001958678,0.00019998755,0.00061390083,0.0013065481,0.00045600053,0.000018391675,0.00056409853,0.00015826436],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003757505,0.00006554704,0.00003831776,0.00003212088,0.00012969642,0.00012833595,0.14906442,0.00000453212,0.000008430296,0.7662378,0.08352117,0.00073203584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007000902,0.00025856207,0.00076141936,0.00012205234,0.00010264729,0.000068351816,0.004997145,0.0000013391659,0.0000036102601,0.080019824,0.9127406,0.00022438914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6277072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99543726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8292194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041073454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014140283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156874062","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.22.1.213","title":"The “Wicked Problem” of Fiscal Equality for Women","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Ethnology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.021063567933980436,"score_gpt":0.24849004088293505,"score_spread":0.22742647294895463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156874062","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.821995,0.006662888,0.000020826426,0.11704119,0.003948231,0.00057316525,0.00030500913,0.000004391976,0.049449258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9003365,0.00057425804,0.00006120149,0.001111416,0.0009207796,0.000029591396,0.0000012886434,0.000019766083,0.09694522],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779814,0.00036200328,0.0005971402,0.00014703993,0.0001987664,0.0008969124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969712,0.0007035916,0.00055760535,0.00023639345,0.00020334359,0.001327879],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064632194,0.00014110951,0.00046771087,0.0001778418,0.0017079704,0.0004868396,0.00066534313,0.00018376608,0.0004400625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036358534,0.00011985463,0.00022536489,0.0002518644,0.0071106143,0.0002854007,0.000023304106,0.0006311144,0.000007369193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000093643146,0.000015708303,0.00012998776,0.000104861334,0.000121265635,0.000011208628,0.14572029,0.0000024806213,0.000009188914,0.83953965,0.0054148138,0.008836886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008686091,0.000110402834,0.00032729344,0.000050916984,0.000032448057,0.00004340125,0.013739485,0.000008761922,0.0000018456312,0.2578867,0.72681797,0.00011217185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42229593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98838985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7214031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016332421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033915958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2235448125","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.27.2.248","title":"Religious Freedom and Sexual Orientation: Equality Jurisprudence and Intersecting Identities","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Sexual orientation; Charter; Religious identity; Identity (music); Sociology; Human sexuality; Diversity (politics); Gender studies; Freedom of religion; Political science; Representation (politics); Law; Human rights; Philosophy","score_opus":0.041832176519524124,"score_gpt":0.30508476836259724,"score_spread":0.2632525918430731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2235448125","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95936245,0.0014131768,0.00009493304,0.0059912126,0.00046540907,0.00006421381,0.000016817316,0.000004230075,0.03258755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971626,0.00012571397,0.00007588425,0.0009467666,0.00035596912,0.0000016651546,5.8122595e-7,0.0000038109756,0.001327004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991355,0.0001939641,0.00020079107,0.000086190485,0.00012894353,0.0002546078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987227,0.00025445112,0.00015041759,0.000058968624,0.00014005699,0.00067342306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017059133,0.00006722751,0.00017548208,0.0000514039,0.0003938122,0.00023821845,0.000116702875,0.000036422574,0.0000134970505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037992778,0.00005639214,0.000018944807,0.000074621385,0.002130003,0.00028410435,0.000021507924,0.00015117548,9.008937e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017864186,0.0000019535291,0.0042573027,0.00000831816,0.000021227665,0.000023871491,0.101979144,0.0000040477657,4.7136803e-7,0.89313054,0.00038992637,0.00016535351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018714579,0.0002943789,0.0010891244,0.00010949593,0.000062425956,0.00080153014,0.45966372,0.000022892531,0.0000028234306,0.3483287,0.18745717,0.00029625406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059054457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11445466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5448018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022504854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014380888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9472114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2251680096","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.27.2.224","title":"Critical Indigenous Legal Theory Part 1: The Dialogue Within","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Feeling; Publishing; Consciousness; Law; Sociology; Project commissioning; Practice of law; Political science; Legal profession; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06063740446722613,"score_gpt":0.3302824035192133,"score_spread":0.26964499905198713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2251680096","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38763174,0.0010865318,0.00007193744,0.4088431,0.0034598035,0.00025744026,0.000023487139,0.000011040271,0.1986149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98482263,0.000029341658,0.000035580033,0.009751413,0.0008993684,0.0000093573535,0.0000013317783,0.000008154182,0.0044427933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982289,0.0008656038,0.0002865531,0.000076212695,0.00017696795,0.0003657762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975347,0.0010668464,0.00018305432,0.00014266552,0.00034513444,0.000727593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008461771,0.0000760902,0.00016236473,0.00007393695,0.00091519475,0.00064103695,0.00035687807,0.00006209164,0.00017090907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044080517,0.00004829592,0.00004717781,0.00025714617,0.0012330947,0.0006366147,0.000011559284,0.0005827462,0.000019308523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027843424,0.000008806249,0.0001415445,0.000001912712,0.000022989196,0.00001750078,0.24188314,0.0000040519044,1.8791395e-7,0.7549751,0.002539629,0.0003773249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031890816,0.00004122527,0.00011729779,0.000013349791,0.000019727191,0.000114865084,0.06943626,0.0000018957476,0.0000014352954,0.3704917,0.559378,0.00006528698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040013168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19239303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5971909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032866537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054756464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97135615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269485834","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.27.2.157","title":"Edward Greenspan: A Feminist Reflection on the Eulogies Surrounding His Death","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Criminology; Reflection (computer programming); Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Sociology; Sexual assault; Law; Political science; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Medicine; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.09050535326923154,"score_gpt":0.30617153508879663,"score_spread":0.2156661818195651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269485834","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60634714,0.0011206701,0.000010213434,0.08571673,0.0010993954,0.00019886388,0.000011848318,0.000016628223,0.3054785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869743,0.00022248788,0.000025494028,0.0044164,0.00067108986,0.0000069909806,6.3408584e-7,0.000009186902,0.007673442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866587,0.00039783656,0.00019940411,0.00010185479,0.00021940196,0.00041566257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998694,0.00031749904,0.00019296512,0.00013159937,0.00013691216,0.000527008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038032976,0.00010414646,0.00021729508,0.000018885881,0.0011222818,0.00032800087,0.00036362335,0.00010301276,0.000053266594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049054605,0.00006130295,0.00010935016,0.00018991456,0.0007180477,0.00017017926,0.0000150625965,0.00039198057,0.000008125788],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004122304,0.000005366616,0.0009858031,0.0000043072023,0.00004897502,0.000022508852,0.17334397,0.000008211215,0.0000011879782,0.81670237,0.008535794,0.00030026096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064640003,0.00012855712,0.0002879557,0.000071761875,0.000027287138,0.00009148223,0.12623791,0.00000549968,0.0000063148073,0.2320032,0.64036846,0.0001251849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0131378025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.110473245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63183266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008270975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007016991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9934338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269571185","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.27.2.284","title":"Transforming Choices: The Marginalization of Gender-Specific Policy Making in Canadian Approaches to Women's Federal Imprisonment","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Imprisonment; Conceptualization; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Service (business); Sociology; Law; Medicine; Business","score_opus":0.10777846183729474,"score_gpt":0.29325069503793944,"score_spread":0.1854722332006447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269571185","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9729292,0.00068111625,0.00035843826,0.011598381,0.00018124898,0.00023201584,0.000009046843,0.000002381497,0.014008165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982245,0.0001419037,0.00003549707,0.000987884,0.00026599175,0.000019018216,8.9343405e-7,0.000009549818,0.00031473872],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985099,0.00022690333,0.0003365838,0.00011261065,0.00019375262,0.0006202585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986367,0.00009152433,0.0001548447,0.00012137673,0.00008274415,0.0009127791],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028515747,0.00010267252,0.00026630593,0.00043308167,0.0004827221,0.00021628223,0.0003152728,0.000055084813,0.00004497027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011933046,0.00007648152,0.00007318255,0.00064291025,0.00023936386,0.00019816216,0.000009701306,0.00018896021,0.0000016202135],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006281459,0.000012859693,0.0033860125,0.000023547496,0.000063908185,0.000021817994,0.7164585,0.0010904322,0.0000019514077,0.2678635,0.00006550029,0.010949171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006683525,0.000091556074,0.0010733905,0.0000706194,0.00004264525,0.000044671455,0.863695,0.0001644123,0.0000039973315,0.014396096,0.119589776,0.00015947924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75505555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98342615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2534674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025896512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022247736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67718476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339999129","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.28.1.230","title":"Case Commentary: <i>R. v Walsh</i> and the “Myth” of Marital Rape","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Mythology; Context (archaeology); Meaning (existential); Plaintiff; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; History; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.02778402045500947,"score_gpt":0.2688105540889784,"score_spread":0.24102653363396895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339999129","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66935205,0.0019878743,0.000038404825,0.3124842,0.00041725577,0.00022779811,0.00004785987,0.0000045904867,0.015439943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900549,0.0005606907,0.000021049196,0.008010424,0.00019149271,0.000004338508,3.0573977e-7,0.0000059501754,0.0011508142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902016,0.00029952446,0.0002457608,0.00007105398,0.000107357955,0.00025613583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986057,0.0007191227,0.00019179676,0.00008602286,0.00011125807,0.0002860517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020169816,0.000078748075,0.00027604654,0.000051695497,0.0005827746,0.0000747057,0.00015909855,0.000036716363,0.000068644855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017279801,0.000039000282,0.000052753643,0.000107300446,0.001654069,0.00016149257,0.000025997022,0.00010039383,9.571223e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035064897,0.000018904064,0.007469061,0.000021450513,0.00036384954,0.00030715528,0.24064356,0.0000019828317,0.000004452199,0.725889,0.015718482,0.009211454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013449332,0.00024157361,0.00086811016,0.00015553922,0.00016111165,0.0016353859,0.17572108,0.00001890416,0.00001829129,0.15160277,0.65580356,0.0003243338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019257262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.084071666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6400851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010043408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015007236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9872736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2507876249","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.28.2.314","title":"Indian Act Sex Discrimination: Enough Inquiry Already, Just Fix It","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; Criminology; Law; Sex discrimination; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.065825242173339,"score_gpt":0.3111458523708563,"score_spread":0.24532061019751727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2507876249","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7795977,0.0007149027,0.000009414912,0.19027033,0.0007966105,0.00022497479,0.00002732979,0.000010551888,0.028348187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857321,0.0004904873,0.000027721731,0.0020513078,0.00092605967,0.000010499683,0.0000010734396,0.000011965325,0.010748796],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983885,0.00030548073,0.00031984152,0.00014507046,0.00022815245,0.0006129238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982868,0.00040080096,0.00025213635,0.00012501777,0.00017120808,0.00076407066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016545668,0.00014845876,0.00034392357,0.00007351441,0.001040603,0.00020908633,0.0004124748,0.000101375415,0.00033129146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000559203,0.000084734114,0.00011055692,0.00014845854,0.001371673,0.0005019789,0.000034411103,0.00022001953,0.000022599928],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032455275,0.000012507332,0.002215425,0.000022194046,0.00014639019,0.0001042102,0.7778477,0.0000012688299,0.000008413499,0.20292833,0.0057386425,0.010942472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025081087,0.00015002167,0.0137646785,0.00030429466,0.000073561656,0.00010975127,0.31907943,0.0000012143347,0.000031384887,0.033429436,0.63012964,0.00041848063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027786966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30958873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62439096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009789132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046678513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9786871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510983704","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.28.2.321","title":"Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women Crisis: Technological Dimensions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Stalking; Harassment; Criminology; Racism; Pornography; Sociology; Colonialism; Political science; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.025266399982947687,"score_gpt":0.27174622918849006,"score_spread":0.24647982920554237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510983704","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97481817,0.0014877674,0.00006891487,0.010834287,0.00015860202,0.00013572328,0.0000116853535,0.000013732675,0.012471101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970782,0.00073672325,0.000073326766,0.0014966368,0.00009099074,0.000008103051,1.3472926e-7,0.000008483109,0.00050741376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986682,0.00020009957,0.00024137432,0.00012994872,0.0001164716,0.0006438916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871594,0.00021946381,0.00013732137,0.00012209492,0.00008326229,0.00072191097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020223523,0.00010370847,0.0002746226,0.00011770371,0.00081518077,0.00015271059,0.00026468668,0.00010742388,0.000081291895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002570988,0.00006151006,0.00004331489,0.00013657623,0.0012435196,0.00018539798,0.000027629747,0.0001946552,0.000006294957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011936641,0.000023546358,0.0024494836,0.000019892035,0.000110119065,0.00022851155,0.21974824,0.0000012765576,0.00017565564,0.7484455,0.00055011705,0.028128257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027626555,0.0002980642,0.007828353,0.0003880786,0.000045774526,0.00040207017,0.12924427,0.000007605341,0.00006595507,0.7495595,0.10893339,0.00046425898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040058964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004347889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.108383276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037688596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004611681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62697935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2516513570","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.28.2.452","title":"Re-Imagining an Agentic Ashley: <i>Looking for Ashley: Re-Reading What the Smith Case Reveals about the Governance of Girls, Mothers and Families in Canada</i> by Rebecca Jaremko Bromwich","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Corporate governance; Sociology; Close reading; Gender studies; Art; Political science; Law; Management; Literature","score_opus":0.016094479932095562,"score_gpt":0.23070454436014662,"score_spread":0.21461006442805106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2516513570","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94287187,0.013101922,0.000014608936,0.038261328,0.00055135915,0.0003983442,0.0001700476,0.000003767737,0.0046267444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99167407,0.0032621224,0.000012315023,0.0023528137,0.00014622626,0.000013290712,5.5346374e-7,0.000021097696,0.0025175142],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981996,0.00037158138,0.00044194655,0.00018704233,0.00021685526,0.0005830103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980175,0.00065572094,0.0004751799,0.00024982844,0.00010653847,0.00049522397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030903497,0.00013977813,0.0003735587,0.00012248417,0.0011439315,0.0005625091,0.00047831316,0.000059962196,0.000040390256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040258563,0.00009366993,0.00007376595,0.00020898918,0.0012968708,0.00071396516,0.00002060791,0.00024537367,3.3686203e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026338355,0.000024174711,0.009542019,0.00027428957,0.0003537379,0.0009725281,0.72682726,0.00004517484,0.00014349681,0.18293637,0.023871068,0.054746486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026521075,0.0001233719,0.0029419372,0.0019193473,0.00013166408,0.00040216753,0.37740064,0.00004837263,0.000025910718,0.016918495,0.59695506,0.0004809055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98885876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.573084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026905271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036534686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87983125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2516762043","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.28.2.393","title":"The Berger Inquiry in Retrospect: Its Legacy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Economic Justice; Sustainability; Sociology; Social justice; Environmental justice; Political science; Law; Environmental ethics; Social science; Ecology","score_opus":0.025794540887707666,"score_gpt":0.27102162932080376,"score_spread":0.2452270884330961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2516762043","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8641391,0.0013077017,0.0000017728191,0.075380154,0.0004888226,0.000108884014,0.000007691246,0.0000026602359,0.058563236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98577654,0.0009225186,0.0000039191373,0.0017013446,0.00053385244,0.000004519196,1.3828023e-7,0.0000088059,0.011048331],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881965,0.00024570833,0.00023570606,0.00008184591,0.00012372294,0.0004933479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998916,0.0003351889,0.00013194776,0.00012381749,0.000020862633,0.0004721909],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002139974,0.000079306774,0.00017319442,0.000052392366,0.00052889,0.00015910625,0.00034387584,0.00005632372,0.00019026618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021614238,0.00004137575,0.0000617159,0.00011280847,0.0010047898,0.00031896966,0.000018541283,0.00018114288,0.000023030076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027390397,0.0000041108333,0.0034863916,0.000002187024,0.00001778607,0.000031379557,0.034921683,7.2722366e-7,0.000011767682,0.9586856,0.00079396914,0.0020170147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014018647,0.00006773037,0.014169459,0.000092850285,0.000009427805,0.000046647583,0.008514177,7.7987664e-7,0.000025041014,0.16724351,0.80828184,0.0001466515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012870854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3028146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8074879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057446683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003271948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99370253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2517766571","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.28.2.308","title":"A Long Road Behind Us, a Long Road Ahead: Towards an Indigenous Feminist National Inquiry","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Dehumanization; Gender studies; Context (archaeology); White (mutation); Government (linguistics); Political science; Indigenous culture; Sociology; Criminology; Economic growth; Geography; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.030865202705714592,"score_gpt":0.30395429673987756,"score_spread":0.273089094034163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2517766571","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9684257,0.0021207854,0.00001580695,0.008171375,0.0007573048,0.00018369559,0.000014990248,0.0000120837085,0.020298263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920346,0.00046144368,0.000026363849,0.0012990789,0.0011579441,0.000007194011,0.0000026842079,0.000020446048,0.0049902424],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979786,0.00035956022,0.00040217463,0.00019002773,0.00036400068,0.0007055964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980863,0.00013551205,0.00028477178,0.00015286052,0.00022570431,0.0011148592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002933564,0.00016452266,0.0003550138,0.0002068698,0.00097130256,0.000322534,0.0005229929,0.00019780661,0.00030499237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025668836,0.00010704703,0.000111290065,0.00019580117,0.0011935283,0.00040310228,0.000023230317,0.00033534545,0.000019722767],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014828493,0.00005396023,0.042966533,0.000016733517,0.00028460915,0.00048694664,0.8759155,0.00001321436,0.0000038778553,0.037315506,0.00064938876,0.04214544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010092859,0.0012012633,0.31763494,0.0013717611,0.00023402291,0.0021415139,0.17953274,0.000024193761,0.000055033262,0.15278846,0.33330482,0.0016184195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032117385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18159945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69638276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008055778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022827818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9743278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2518373336","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.28.2.253","title":"Shining Light on the Dark Places: Addressing Police Racism and Sexualized Violence against Indigenous Women and Girls in the National Inquiry","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Racism; Criminology; Legislature; Human rights; Economic Justice; Political science; Criminal justice; Sociology; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.05553313272257683,"score_gpt":0.31359552236632693,"score_spread":0.2580623896437501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2518373336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9863623,0.000559005,0.000011499862,0.0092641,0.00011815687,0.00011764153,0.000009628855,0.0000028517584,0.0035548552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994651,0.0007358416,0.000006110826,0.0041079815,0.00027914936,0.000016264068,3.2414863e-7,0.000006732512,0.0001965533],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848586,0.0005048228,0.00025063948,0.00013136269,0.00023050905,0.00039678256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981058,0.0012417887,0.00020201642,0.00009412659,0.00008577608,0.00027049385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004037132,0.00010579139,0.00021790524,0.0001787259,0.0010658336,0.00036127615,0.0002977041,0.000056684738,0.000025127561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038227747,0.00005331629,0.00003613098,0.0002692819,0.0006211074,0.00024590705,0.00002025237,0.00024506517,0.000001335401],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088697605,0.0000129538275,0.0012674473,0.000012726614,0.00006171153,0.00002369244,0.9440051,0.000011490358,0.000021001746,0.030203449,0.00009927999,0.024192482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011908305,0.000121923855,0.0033213866,0.00047447626,0.000052675674,0.0001190785,0.95404136,0.000025365822,0.0000053256495,0.03214825,0.008305071,0.00019425954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01344552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14242254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12897702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037663136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048244596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.993124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2549256179","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.28.3.568","title":"Les femmes et le travail de soins aux enfants : quelle reconnaissance par les régimes étatiques d'indemnisation ?","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Health, Medicine and Society","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08326347946918894,"score_gpt":0.36240308666210863,"score_spread":0.2791396071929197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2549256179","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68729705,0.017027212,0.0004794655,0.28237522,0.0008718925,0.00041737797,0.00011711156,0.00001503845,0.011399642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.956991,0.011234003,0.00031596195,0.014882306,0.0009671783,0.00003216879,0.0000043780274,0.000058143796,0.015514863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935071,0.0035139085,0.0011268408,0.0002902865,0.00020178563,0.0013601064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941793,0.0026381926,0.0008042141,0.00031969676,0.0003101281,0.0017484884],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009226846,0.0003266765,0.00087301974,0.00015199558,0.0016813464,0.000081787104,0.00039449925,0.0007351858,0.00072669814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001367925,0.00022699063,0.00020877268,0.00016595112,0.0013868855,0.0005044605,0.000031228195,0.0019269024,0.000023199305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016225761,0.000058541416,0.02287377,0.000718857,0.00024769345,0.00010591438,0.36030778,0.0000043532123,0.000037560938,0.48918447,0.024145242,0.10215356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00821964,0.00070451933,0.07659812,0.0060077733,0.00014359572,0.00038241022,0.16052376,0.00009184941,0.00008597432,0.19906269,0.5475649,0.0006147621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12202612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40916795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5234197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010866865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011377835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2551268723","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.28.3.617","title":"Dénonciation, régulation et réforme du droit de la famille par les groupes de pères séparés : ce que nous apprend la comparaison France-Québec","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Journal of Communication (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010688077683871536,"score_gpt":0.2227661887705756,"score_spread":0.21207811108670407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2551268723","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90047425,0.011360416,0.00059476483,0.045221314,0.0006882358,0.00018467735,0.00012018612,0.000013149936,0.041343007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97904366,0.002760809,0.000065026434,0.0016560716,0.0007057434,0.000012056887,0.0000024732615,0.000026673044,0.015727486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99749655,0.0009272526,0.00046359957,0.0001878898,0.00020803168,0.0007167092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972585,0.0009891992,0.00043347364,0.00015521316,0.0001416901,0.0010219569],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032942442,0.00018910672,0.00045011094,0.00030863882,0.0013667034,0.0005507735,0.00040899118,0.00025827973,0.0004761326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037160065,0.00017967043,0.00018063604,0.00023537333,0.0029476006,0.0006152311,0.000018738914,0.00040593543,0.000020541564],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070464215,0.000041890667,0.016696641,0.00007830816,0.00016222907,0.00014417537,0.19369853,0.00019118686,0.0000196229,0.76044697,0.008821502,0.019628493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013913877,0.000077769255,0.046683963,0.00030465666,0.000074159805,0.00028200226,0.0048989533,0.000086745866,0.0000034778936,0.07193435,0.87399983,0.00026267787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8899302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9906278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86517835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004454968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057851267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2552359120","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.28.3.469","title":"Couvrez ce genre que le droit ne saurait voir : la difficile circulation du concept féministe de genre dans la langue juridique","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02030823337392406,"score_gpt":0.25446448872416444,"score_spread":0.23415625535024037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2552359120","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82578516,0.0068314364,0.00064125005,0.06865144,0.0010313246,0.00030021454,0.00032700304,0.000018505632,0.09641366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96626747,0.0010578459,0.000041828578,0.0018063982,0.0010030667,0.000014400809,0.000004773001,0.000037086564,0.029767115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99666536,0.001301556,0.00059517426,0.00028263187,0.00025513239,0.0009001669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99692136,0.0012009817,0.00045942137,0.00024681655,0.00019827932,0.00097313797],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031664101,0.00028855624,0.0006381314,0.0000987566,0.0008944986,0.00021470948,0.00049810664,0.0002964973,0.00014586915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038378875,0.00022805753,0.00021514216,0.00022081788,0.002734394,0.00031853962,0.000045208195,0.0004045766,0.000011594744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004111128,0.000037906466,0.0016486547,0.00005428326,0.00021321121,0.0002677368,0.33325043,0.000032486616,0.00005927221,0.65977424,0.0015973592,0.0030233292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004352127,0.00028151297,0.0151350405,0.00056796946,0.0001953362,0.0013740399,0.3749179,0.000073069816,0.000058753554,0.12951054,0.472777,0.000756689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04846793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25447062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53026366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012616424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003140965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604592581","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.29.1.110","title":"From the Invisible Hand to the Invisible Woman: A Gender Perspective on the Tax Policy Discourse on Social Tax Expenditures","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Obstacle; Face (sociological concept); Welfare; Profit (economics); Social Welfare; Tax policy; Welfare state; Public economics; For profit; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Law; Tax reform; Social science; Politics","score_opus":0.06870872667434458,"score_gpt":0.3555241493173292,"score_spread":0.2868154226429846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604592581","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38794643,0.00036047297,0.0000014469032,0.55567324,0.00048255015,0.00033482784,0.000119775264,0.0000037610523,0.055077482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9659846,0.00022028538,0.0000019976003,0.022937318,0.007125374,0.000035190107,5.6981565e-7,0.000017379765,0.003677325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803823,0.00052909035,0.00022906037,0.00018232649,0.00033430528,0.00068695983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980843,0.0006800679,0.0003665749,0.00036884082,0.000102223064,0.00039800123],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019904757,0.00019797076,0.00033936216,0.000082064325,0.010324983,0.0010697865,0.0012986565,0.000101869315,0.000053788543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010374034,0.00008462939,0.00019671474,0.0001372368,0.0029741167,0.00019647904,0.0000931171,0.0005911452,0.000017889937],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007291911,0.0000091292995,0.00011735911,0.0000012437081,0.0001600293,0.000010614127,0.39613315,0.0000049294645,0.0000010456953,0.5812927,0.021795327,0.00040158082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007718204,0.000095032374,0.010787849,0.000056488236,0.00004073979,0.0000061359724,0.42924002,0.0000015438906,0.00001310339,0.48823276,0.07058856,0.00016594422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28654835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.54029036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5780381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006732603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008662508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604767750","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.29.1.83","title":"La traite des femmes dans le contexte des grands évènements sportifs : quel plan de match ?","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.043268785252391924,"score_gpt":0.28194038450946846,"score_spread":0.23867159925707654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604767750","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9151161,0.015366154,0.000034330766,0.017681133,0.00074374565,0.00018057734,0.00002517472,0.0000075603384,0.050845277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96954995,0.0037560058,0.000117792006,0.00061639905,0.00035851306,0.000008375201,0.0000020819577,0.000031226406,0.02555967],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974713,0.0005776355,0.00051604334,0.00019551045,0.00018351279,0.001056003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99737716,0.00025139842,0.0005818337,0.00027334318,0.00014672101,0.0013695575],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034679559,0.00025486728,0.0005758428,0.00010468467,0.0035254231,0.000978667,0.0008574181,0.0002763877,0.00024299762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023041258,0.00020562421,0.00021422839,0.00013470979,0.0075398027,0.00065327884,0.000036440706,0.00061132945,0.000013902989],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012443734,0.00005813759,0.08472933,0.00011850602,0.00054986315,0.00071154884,0.68998474,0.000024026476,0.000013366845,0.19321041,0.0007620648,0.029713549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039689294,0.00020920178,0.12150524,0.0014077339,0.00019124827,0.0008045695,0.1983788,0.00003708132,0.00004410069,0.59618914,0.07680621,0.00045777202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26755878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43149263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49160597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062066404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011218257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99777186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605000961","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.29.1.157","title":"Challenging Colonial Norms and Attending to Presencing in Stories of Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Scholarship; Resistance (ecology); Transformative learning; Criminology; Colonialism; Sociology; Ethnography; Gender studies; Political science; History; Law; Anthropology; Ecology","score_opus":0.025931977857568702,"score_gpt":0.2930801448877805,"score_spread":0.2671481670302118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605000961","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99023646,0.0007827536,0.00000492563,0.003617889,0.00033351925,0.00024314482,0.0000050820436,0.0000019477607,0.0047742724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978623,0.0011043524,0.00005188943,0.00007958523,0.0002786148,0.0000020773857,2.2119485e-7,0.000008520772,0.00061243086],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988014,0.00014502482,0.0002697004,0.00011124049,0.00010842058,0.00056422374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987064,0.00016339977,0.0002881093,0.0001166415,0.000083938525,0.00064153486],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002726662,0.00008707363,0.0003152142,0.00018062911,0.00437147,0.00025120925,0.000224096,0.00006986665,0.000009681554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000069218746,0.00006816033,0.000019274994,0.000069290116,0.00053143635,0.00029844482,0.000004892746,0.00018535106,2.1827894e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033676646,0.000006093581,0.0071866172,0.000057434463,0.000019358355,0.000025130557,0.92056495,0.0000036296128,0.0000023040848,0.07105698,0.0000018150557,0.0010420217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0046294658,0.0007014661,0.11826392,0.0012892528,0.000047481168,0.00037506202,0.60721964,0.000043589633,0.000048958118,0.13073802,0.13591301,0.0007301492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3752237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9533166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57809293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000609754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040264437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605085003","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.29.1.182","title":"“Bringing Canadian Women on Board”: A Behavioural Economics Perspective on Whether Public Reporting of Gender Diversity Will Alter the Male-Dominated Composition of Canadian Public Company Boards and Senior Management","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Corporate governance; Accounting; Context (archaeology); Public disclosure; Issuer; Gender diversity; Senior management; Corporate law; Dismissal; Public relations; Business; Political science; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.10844303614752875,"score_gpt":0.27578280301380914,"score_spread":0.16733976686628038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605085003","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93185496,0.00004039058,0.0000020120913,0.026671875,0.00020523602,0.00024093126,0.00009171842,0.0000023606876,0.040890504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99849707,0.000060010105,0.000017347795,0.00095012604,0.000058787406,0.0000027870424,0.0000022966603,0.0000089702335,0.00040263106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981887,0.00030657774,0.0004563178,0.00019135633,0.00017268698,0.0006844125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970848,0.000077166515,0.0010782223,0.0002923759,0.000272355,0.0011950631],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004045162,0.00014277725,0.00040048643,0.00050680246,0.0026678955,0.00036346348,0.0005661097,0.00008350199,0.000117074625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017777107,0.00011972608,0.00010610681,0.00012396688,0.0009225938,0.0004615726,0.000085906926,0.0003027838,9.180223e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102935024,0.000029163555,0.1266339,0.000039289367,0.0004592477,0.00015605304,0.24571536,0.00003187183,0.000002182721,0.6258827,0.00026112556,0.0006861866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038180773,0.0002961406,0.47633752,0.000198867,0.00018885324,0.0001354319,0.47445917,0.00015998853,0.00002076475,0.034583982,0.009222507,0.0005786847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91255873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9799501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5912987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027043817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010306833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605096447","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.29.1.36","title":"Why Doesn't She Just Report It? Apprehensions and Contradictions for Women Who Report Sexual Violence to the Police","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Criminology; Criminal justice; Psychology; Skepticism; Economic Justice; Sexual violence; Social psychology; Political science; Suicide prevention; Law; Poison control; Medicine; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.05930228821257924,"score_gpt":0.33541096490479133,"score_spread":0.27610867669221206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605096447","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7521197,0.00035683546,0.00037350482,0.22646777,0.0011155866,0.0006233641,0.00006542495,0.00001212096,0.018865652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811993,0.00022257649,0.00005706295,0.008837911,0.0007905194,0.000068613626,0.0000016112848,0.00001278088,0.008809578],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998616,0.00012101426,0.00039592836,0.00018999918,0.00017063989,0.00050642237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99776196,0.000382579,0.00044513273,0.00033976606,0.00031874966,0.00075179146],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002819905,0.0001236442,0.0003417544,0.00007927903,0.0037314978,0.0005006728,0.00038513195,0.00006687937,0.00002708655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011115634,0.00008070525,0.000050595794,0.00010911066,0.0008904253,0.00027673322,0.000045732766,0.00019343804,0.000001000443],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020262496,0.000035705878,0.015513155,0.000045662462,0.0005614845,0.00034687552,0.73505926,0.000091908776,0.000008303504,0.1814747,0.06067095,0.005989359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008363836,0.00011292983,0.008692881,0.000074641335,0.000052505635,0.0006827627,0.23253967,0.00003054318,0.0000010791917,0.013361922,0.74344885,0.00016581203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05673856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39563066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68277794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022925316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051628763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2744029610","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.26.2.02","title":"Eloquent (In)action: Enforcement and Prosecutorial Restraint in the Transnational Trade in Human Eggs As Deep Ambivalence about the Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Geographies of human-animal interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ambivalence; Action (physics); Enforcement; Political science; Law; Free trade; International trade; Law and economics; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.031206426406557842,"score_gpt":0.31436770649925794,"score_spread":0.2831612800927001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2744029610","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92557,0.00019314805,0.0000019002496,0.047179624,0.00036873875,0.00034039302,0.0000042851075,0.0000025260133,0.026339382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99799085,0.00006568493,0.000006814292,0.0014028818,0.0003131987,0.000037905196,0.0000010432499,0.00000616172,0.00017548919],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839085,0.0004892212,0.00037500344,0.00012629032,0.00023735373,0.00038125532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991761,0.0003276413,0.00014920985,0.00011338771,0.000039256447,0.0001944007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032627268,0.00010373646,0.00018587284,0.00015805043,0.00059861556,0.00028348842,0.00037606666,0.00005856867,0.0001253558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008437245,0.000068846275,0.000061294755,0.00021506348,0.0009376889,0.00025160378,0.000008496926,0.00049236155,6.288268e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039883318,0.000017874594,0.0006728582,0.0000064128462,0.000014179875,0.00001959597,0.12771933,0.00005833694,0.00000582083,0.8712671,0.000029922863,0.00014868412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035195844,0.00046776183,0.11090027,0.00017506214,0.000034703262,0.0002028959,0.19830653,0.000076271455,0.000008241342,0.5624022,0.12360741,0.0002990957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05676034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8932521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83649176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003283389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019761048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94952077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2764441751","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.24.1.135","title":"Cashing in on Cachet? Ethnicity and Gender in the Strip Club","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Emotional Labor in Professions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.09357365522868774,"score_gpt":0.3313041764939929,"score_spread":0.23773052126530517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2764441751","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8988925,0.009495974,0.0000024891106,0.067027956,0.0010862735,0.00017980428,0.000028246328,0.0000012631604,0.023285463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919126,0.000660943,0.000024528395,0.0052723205,0.00054987427,0.000005728709,7.8907834e-7,0.000010986025,0.001562212],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996876,0.0016653294,0.0003774405,0.00011484911,0.00021583591,0.00075051945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99785376,0.0011282515,0.00020740398,0.00013513597,0.000054385717,0.00062103913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008430777,0.0001369219,0.0002920004,0.0001437261,0.0004531361,0.00011058481,0.0003570907,0.0001618135,0.00010595835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004758054,0.00009451837,0.00005734556,0.00038735766,0.00087671983,0.0004362073,0.000027816786,0.0011048282,0.0000050187505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020178562,0.00003155223,0.017011568,0.00002045573,0.000020847387,0.0000587423,0.26246938,0.000029011453,7.3509943e-7,0.7189986,0.00025860503,0.0010803305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021305191,0.00011586339,0.21942888,0.0005479846,0.000050591465,0.00033263318,0.11999089,0.000054122826,0.0000020559785,0.6058193,0.051223025,0.00030415182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045240737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.407702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36246127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081142207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006233518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9611171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769949280","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.29.2.227","title":"Refugee Claims and Criminalization of Same-Sex Intimacy: The Case of <i>Sebastiao</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Persecution; Law; Sexual orientation; Political science; Appeal; Criminology; Immigration; Criminalization; Sociology; Gender studies; Politics","score_opus":0.037739050162414245,"score_gpt":0.2942526103547262,"score_spread":0.256513560192312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769949280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.980799,0.0003853735,0.00003052651,0.0067061223,0.00017301008,0.000114921095,0.000010665132,0.0000013239254,0.011779061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975828,0.00016766717,0.00005893664,0.00043684876,0.000109718116,0.0000018431566,4.1223262e-7,0.0000059340687,0.0016358539],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991711,0.00014512723,0.00028947493,0.00007591574,0.000099046934,0.00021936846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883187,0.00013375477,0.00043965425,0.00017798918,0.0001326544,0.0002841015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019616946,0.00007321156,0.00024744275,0.000059698457,0.00094581634,0.00016506664,0.0002963311,0.000044290577,0.00008206122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014641874,0.000042952674,0.00004479867,0.00004226568,0.0013762409,0.00017374787,0.000027082388,0.00012683916,5.059881e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036754493,0.000008522482,0.0013288762,0.000038600036,0.000060423026,0.00018168238,0.1567988,0.000003977275,0.000005604146,0.83594507,0.00044245183,0.0051492136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031761206,0.0002636025,0.009003463,0.00040162608,0.00015801284,0.0011987247,0.062332176,0.00008109057,0.00016710539,0.743293,0.17957488,0.00035023244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029980185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23676074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20678055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009501987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005056035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97647923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770192177","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.29.2.317","title":"Quand le droit international des droits de l'Homme et le droit canadien des réfugiés LGBTQ+ convergent","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Ethnology; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.04795517911316034,"score_gpt":0.2777231812338096,"score_spread":0.2297680021206493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770192177","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86622876,0.002690463,0.00014962058,0.05260738,0.0021119246,0.00022928549,0.00011055592,0.000008229892,0.075863786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.960315,0.0010730575,0.0002697282,0.001814819,0.00056244666,0.000013614367,0.000006934014,0.000037813938,0.035906587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970526,0.00035932285,0.0006699841,0.00030796742,0.0003333059,0.0012767866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996259,0.0002064881,0.00067826995,0.0003574563,0.00034432497,0.0021544856],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038878843,0.00030695036,0.0006155758,0.00019486333,0.0031158128,0.0011813167,0.0013622914,0.00019722071,0.0007575243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031629353,0.00027749027,0.00022110039,0.000115494644,0.0038358162,0.0010390246,0.00009691958,0.0005498079,0.000024993338],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060296166,0.00004621432,0.0052400767,0.00004745094,0.00033086538,0.00048306538,0.10980658,0.000022646389,0.000002609453,0.8793404,0.000986874,0.0036329166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002544115,0.00013187934,0.014707198,0.00040608988,0.000054156848,0.000541131,0.015101537,0.00010127389,0.00002123126,0.7740621,0.19194035,0.00038895957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5380025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9324434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3944409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00289372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005705158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770498450","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.29.2.290","title":"Denying Refugee Protection to LGBTQ and Marginalized Persons: A Retrospective Look at State Protection in Canadian Refugee Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Refugee law; Due diligence; Law; Plaintiff; Political science; State (computer science); International law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.028001999583379646,"score_gpt":0.2742457999350268,"score_spread":0.24624380035164714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770498450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9775287,0.00027800957,0.00004421155,0.011937142,0.00027839353,0.0008712257,0.000023508865,0.0000069008775,0.0090319095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994316,0.00010155617,0.00004527223,0.00063574343,0.00021729255,0.00007272695,0.0000014277215,0.00001571705,0.004594273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834335,0.00034005294,0.00032378818,0.0002213417,0.00018233564,0.00058911747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982732,0.000030399984,0.00034363064,0.00020279606,0.00019677899,0.00095317356],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029962966,0.00014810241,0.00031294549,0.00028155485,0.0022934917,0.0006278019,0.00024427744,0.000115445066,0.000066046516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061888306,0.00012590973,0.000058407033,0.00015220523,0.0005088368,0.00069971074,0.000014094799,0.00036895782,0.0000052761698],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006400387,0.000016923372,0.011382082,0.00006656201,0.00011203722,0.00010757015,0.34603998,0.000023300861,0.00031358536,0.63442975,0.00035914205,0.0065090447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00521229,0.00088120915,0.06299893,0.0008969855,0.000070281036,0.00036270992,0.024346737,0.00034956023,0.00028513843,0.22745119,0.67628646,0.0008585171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8824275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6759273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003559478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010956276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770543075","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.29.2.259","title":"Sexual Orientation in Canada's Revised Refugee Determination System: An Empirical Snapshot","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Sexual orientation; Persecution; Appeal; Immigration; Snapshot (computer storage); Political science; Criminology; Law; Sociology; Psychology; Gender studies; Computer science","score_opus":0.03385908834119809,"score_gpt":0.31231461893346996,"score_spread":0.27845553059227185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770543075","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9890717,0.00011000786,0.000036814756,0.0038668127,0.00047198005,0.00018122944,0.000011474554,0.0000025785876,0.006247397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986178,0.000030587707,0.000036183454,0.00047351792,0.0003301789,0.000008591196,0.000010227548,0.000007158332,0.0004857466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985683,0.0004123298,0.00037718326,0.00012895564,0.00020696528,0.00030629188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863815,0.000089205765,0.000420127,0.00019835841,0.00018943899,0.0004647298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023762952,0.00009192006,0.00024210129,0.000103804945,0.00086416857,0.00037819217,0.00033151967,0.00006718409,0.000060350743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047646134,0.00007346911,0.000029809891,0.00008232295,0.00023917745,0.00070359046,0.0000067559167,0.00019060941,9.3305e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020817862,0.000025323016,0.09051703,0.000110343135,0.00004724154,0.00017167866,0.26289675,0.000039775714,0.000026401509,0.6255336,0.0016392171,0.01878452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009084842,0.0008919675,0.37274054,0.00096342195,0.00015700918,0.0003721385,0.3004935,0.00589782,0.0000951966,0.05099504,0.2570808,0.0012277096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9109572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99952054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5745385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002218961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003433142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6646573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789407380","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.30.1.144","title":"Locating Oneself in One's Research: Learning and Engaging with Law in the Coast Salish World","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Context (archaeology); Operationalization; Law; Sociology; Political science; Indigenous rights; Commission; Legal education; Human rights; Geography; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06969613477776965,"score_gpt":0.3153607896416976,"score_spread":0.24566465486392797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789407380","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8785306,0.000887708,0.0000020217042,0.027901676,0.00007077437,0.00016663113,0.0000017236181,0.0000036639346,0.09243515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964135,0.00012898598,0.00004764622,0.0018461572,0.00036676045,0.000006871406,3.9404452e-7,0.000008278906,0.001181362],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779195,0.0011291702,0.0001959005,0.00011328811,0.000238144,0.00053156493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988298,0.0005785598,0.0001055282,0.00007981401,0.00014015584,0.00026618977],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009990962,0.00007685893,0.00019455234,0.0000471344,0.0013547274,0.00037746158,0.0003039544,0.00005628685,0.0000374185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026644982,0.000048919406,0.000025498817,0.0005717674,0.0020724689,0.00025016317,0.000022702434,0.0010487909,0.0000011280127],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027073509,0.0000067874275,0.0069063916,0.00001193201,0.000013765714,0.000036338526,0.49475735,0.000006768986,0.000002113173,0.4975995,0.00015690805,0.0004750752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015703271,0.00016398371,0.0025716014,0.0005242113,0.000012585185,0.00007194152,0.6970222,0.00002422948,0.00000577905,0.09943078,0.19842795,0.00017443411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.062256705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91577625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85351956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026641396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037375922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790146862","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.30.1.42","title":"Debunking the Myth of “Not My Bad”: Sexual Images, Consent, and Online Host Responsibilities in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wrongdoing; Liability; Amateur; Anonymity; Business; Internet privacy; Pornography; Child pornography; Business model; Advertising; Public relations; Law; The Internet; Marketing; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.045810072597117106,"score_gpt":0.3004491261751099,"score_spread":0.25463905357799277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790146862","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98106223,0.0013490549,0.0000018099608,0.014695522,0.0004864229,0.00015276812,0.0001521098,0.0000039654687,0.0020960986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928123,0.000029683804,0.000021641594,0.0043907613,0.00014217383,0.0000054683956,0.0000024086626,0.000017179842,0.0025784061],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830556,0.00040065215,0.0005115501,0.00018426866,0.000103625964,0.00049434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998208,0.00077859603,0.0002804575,0.000354108,0.00011455602,0.00026428988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015339724,0.00015184567,0.00043716226,0.00019237671,0.00015532537,0.00003775755,0.00035299503,0.00009426978,0.00013994185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025636822,0.00010654303,0.000031229913,0.00016839968,0.0015663829,0.00006184915,0.00004245146,0.000450206,9.07212e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002064266,0.00013382886,0.28424087,0.00010840165,0.0005587425,0.0015012269,0.15788713,0.0000020268747,0.00055348815,0.5300968,0.007533046,0.015320152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0117039345,0.0018223621,0.4372377,0.00034059046,0.00021325264,0.0065269195,0.3610338,0.000028260883,0.0005224376,0.05036795,0.1293379,0.0008648765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8917682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99423724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47972885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036128354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016876538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57714033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885119136","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.30.2.01","title":"<i>Reference re: Andrews v Law Society of British Columbia</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Charter; Appeal; Supreme court; Section (typography); Context (archaeology); Interpretation (philosophy); Meaning (existential); Political science; High Court; Sociology; Constitutional court; Common law; Constitution; Epistemology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0358771769568436,"score_gpt":0.2644654530922324,"score_spread":0.2285882761353888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885119136","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9127786,0.0016448756,0.0000036492345,0.01058005,0.0003619164,0.00020041296,0.00007961075,0.000008055334,0.07434279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898846,0.00075791724,0.00012167904,0.0028301366,0.00044860493,0.0000048504626,8.534824e-7,0.000008657258,0.0059426986],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865794,0.00020141139,0.00032918208,0.00012620617,0.00019951678,0.0004857441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985748,0.00017789924,0.0002838518,0.00010371656,0.00034643649,0.0005133257],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016538484,0.00008291075,0.00037978083,0.000009228981,0.0010123171,0.0003230175,0.00035651494,0.000097815275,0.0002545624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013384123,0.00008547496,0.0001327392,0.00015901963,0.0032064593,0.0002616562,0.00003385226,0.00025791037,0.000004357287],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074686286,0.000052869746,0.013359367,0.00012624475,0.0005984361,0.0000678271,0.4846381,0.0000022277063,0.000048785485,0.35806778,0.13608809,0.006875608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001932393,0.00021921431,0.006884074,0.00025200157,0.000056419707,0.00006661807,0.065625355,0.000006147432,0.000012688762,0.055995706,0.8686605,0.00028889062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68145674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97643226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7325724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035633708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034752532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99950624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885762484","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.30.2.06","title":"<i>R v JA</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Harm; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Criminal code; Law; Human sexuality; Sexual violence; Political science; Sociology; Sexual assault; Criminal law; Criminology; Psychology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; History","score_opus":0.04925315714559517,"score_gpt":0.30131871353574796,"score_spread":0.2520655563901528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885762484","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6647268,0.0015243838,0.000019702382,0.03573385,0.0011408464,0.00012780406,0.000013923278,0.000008439373,0.29670426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820829,0.00023087265,0.000032248143,0.0062074023,0.0010759131,0.0000027809679,3.398011e-7,0.000008486716,0.010359054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876904,0.00023262524,0.00024695444,0.00010149232,0.000146503,0.00050338026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987389,0.0002060531,0.00014917001,0.00012378348,0.00016126237,0.00062083727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025246746,0.00009274049,0.0002718585,0.00006860655,0.0009540641,0.00015927623,0.0003169355,0.000059918268,0.00013042538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026380716,0.00007009012,0.00006961847,0.00014355627,0.0018272318,0.0001464882,0.000019250836,0.0001785911,0.00001617571],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003148377,0.000005735256,0.0009313288,0.000007643193,0.000074258045,0.000025778447,0.41146308,3.282434e-7,0.000001754987,0.5817722,0.004222711,0.0014636806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076074555,0.00012917857,0.0007120059,0.000027189992,0.00001967655,0.000045656427,0.13052294,0.0000021198628,0.0000068329537,0.11171786,0.7559326,0.0001231656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023765802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32254615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75170994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024090835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007013807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98273504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886839932","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.30.2.03","title":"<i>R v Kapp</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Supreme court; Charter; Affirmative action; Law; Deference; Government (linguistics); Political science; Respondent; Disadvantaged; Equal Protection Clause; Section (typography); Law and economics; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.03053588415474346,"score_gpt":0.27633408401553355,"score_spread":0.2457981998607901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886839932","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82719094,0.0013995137,0.00000978667,0.06221163,0.0008221168,0.00017700698,0.000009449602,0.000009607691,0.10816994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903029,0.00019190664,0.00005578109,0.0030750637,0.0010691481,0.0000042093434,2.608274e-7,0.000007637938,0.005293098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988328,0.00020615585,0.00022178877,0.000091696,0.00014827975,0.00049924763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987158,0.00017630543,0.00016324552,0.00008781141,0.00020890227,0.0006479283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016713835,0.0000947719,0.00026068153,0.00003942807,0.0011545885,0.00018801613,0.0003163306,0.000060848353,0.00017916076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034023265,0.00006326647,0.00008174429,0.00014585895,0.0019491873,0.000212896,0.000021309608,0.00020705153,0.000029866818],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037138252,0.0000059620083,0.0016497808,0.0000082519955,0.00010559644,0.000033047803,0.31343707,0.0000010002448,0.0000074886234,0.6777833,0.005249837,0.001681524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010033546,0.000099882265,0.0022617748,0.000051699815,0.000026437994,0.000039016202,0.038964774,0.0000032580654,0.000013420727,0.06553229,0.8918479,0.00015617826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052330866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38951913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88659805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004879599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039010527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95397973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887193794","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.30.2.05","title":"<i>Alberta v Hutterian Brethren of Wilson Colony</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Supreme court; Law; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); High Court; Political science; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.0246152067378612,"score_gpt":0.27130976404522505,"score_spread":0.24669455730736387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887193794","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8868187,0.0006104276,0.0000032155733,0.03869727,0.0005595295,0.00017728283,0.000015031344,0.000003866872,0.073114686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99158585,0.00011231881,0.000051759467,0.0015904751,0.0005973857,0.0000042225115,5.726779e-7,0.000008867522,0.006048543],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871886,0.00024418812,0.00031112117,0.00010343991,0.00015818489,0.00046423002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985757,0.0002709665,0.00029404243,0.00010847068,0.00022967524,0.0005211305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013925008,0.00010947734,0.00037216282,0.000045791036,0.0006924836,0.000109409244,0.00036097565,0.0000814593,0.00019784743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035288156,0.00007700632,0.00009457755,0.00015992943,0.002146338,0.00020548007,0.00002746871,0.00018162112,0.000008618719],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013873322,0.000016702454,0.005951385,0.000033473047,0.0002473626,0.000025429716,0.56209755,0.000001564512,0.000058731257,0.42183775,0.007828821,0.0017625305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022584791,0.00038090485,0.007012027,0.00019601142,0.00007583515,0.000055628992,0.04356992,0.000007376455,0.00009810799,0.04449953,0.9015449,0.00030127502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22566125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7690962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8937161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035660705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035113524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7908272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887699319","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.30.2.04","title":"<i>R v Kapp</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Prima facie; Jurisprudence; Doctrine; Section (typography); Argument (complex analysis); Indigenous; Political science; Race (biology); Sociology; Gender studies; Business","score_opus":0.022998339544274767,"score_gpt":0.2750613597648385,"score_spread":0.2520630202205637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887699319","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43420905,0.002226366,0.00004576348,0.039801218,0.0016250352,0.00020096861,0.000016482587,0.000014604109,0.52186054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860259,0.00005165528,0.000096187905,0.0034844717,0.0013470886,0.0000029367175,2.4616557e-7,0.000011553564,0.008979936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871796,0.00023937538,0.00024184457,0.00009870458,0.00016267663,0.00053943554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998424,0.00018010143,0.0001702031,0.00015838516,0.0001753449,0.00089196226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023256985,0.00008898964,0.00024279693,0.000078653284,0.00064785447,0.00023372378,0.00048213647,0.00007166601,0.0003154078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036356333,0.000067631045,0.000071222705,0.00021219674,0.001995242,0.00023361528,0.000020814985,0.00024871173,0.000059240047],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027515485,0.0000035497908,0.000566727,0.0000039891825,0.00003203314,0.000043772205,0.3454862,6.11124e-7,0.000001964557,0.6509235,0.0021484613,0.0007617134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058533734,0.00007588112,0.00010811525,0.00002931057,0.000013996752,0.000031983567,0.010647417,0.00000289825,0.0000088627,0.11797182,0.870431,0.00009339211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019166552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15827617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8682825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036672613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008628009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9873649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887797623","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.30.2.02","title":"<i>R v Kapp</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Section (typography); Scrutiny; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Test (biology); Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.041675184801869596,"score_gpt":0.2988952863265031,"score_spread":0.2572201015246335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887797623","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4451815,0.00013267763,0.000041814477,0.04825615,0.0006540076,0.000090629816,0.000007449056,0.0000065015765,0.5056293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985065,0.000043996588,0.000028120003,0.0062004114,0.0005774282,0.0000019712288,3.873284e-7,0.0000063374714,0.008076388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901557,0.00022456014,0.00020365448,0.00006966199,0.00012790566,0.00035864176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988643,0.000106809384,0.0001274849,0.000095493066,0.00014974197,0.00065619336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024523677,0.00006249563,0.00017019603,0.00006497722,0.0005578804,0.00021247612,0.00027417234,0.00004699601,0.00032621357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019650203,0.00004808107,0.000058239475,0.00012938723,0.0013215571,0.00021474533,0.000010214751,0.00013119819,0.000033863675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001658278,0.0000038264693,0.0002041061,0.0000036774122,0.000017341941,0.000010217568,0.10537824,2.2689761e-7,0.0000012765446,0.8915658,0.0015797572,0.0012189286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062519003,0.000060683218,0.00047827806,0.000026548787,0.000011458977,0.00002107142,0.012348915,0.0000024902208,0.000008386766,0.33856925,0.6477683,0.00007940103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020291775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34382078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64618856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020577892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005799964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98623216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904010990","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.30.3.007","title":"Feeling Property: Settler Violence in the Time of Reconciliation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Subjectivity; Scholarship; Property (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Sociology; Power (physics); Psychic; Criminology; Identity (music); Colonialism; Ideology; White (mutation); Feeling; Gender studies; Political science; Law; Geography; Aesthetics; Social psychology; Psychology; Politics; Epistemology; Archaeology; Ecology; Art","score_opus":0.022140968093445946,"score_gpt":0.26470958784833676,"score_spread":0.2425686197548908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904010990","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94637644,0.00025250608,0.0000035239766,0.008456251,0.00030319905,0.00021057563,0.000004335627,0.0000015124319,0.044391666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99494714,0.0007674417,0.000024126684,0.000748705,0.0005174927,0.0000013096703,6.85815e-7,0.0000044970748,0.0029886232],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988547,0.00038909802,0.00026478476,0.00006700514,0.00011775688,0.00030664422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916244,0.00015849315,0.00020311894,0.00009790147,0.0001945802,0.00018349178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043640505,0.000053954354,0.0001551343,0.00008065045,0.0011872891,0.000058572343,0.0002663158,0.00005251559,0.00009679373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003864597,0.000027458862,0.000031385265,0.00017125855,0.00054068695,0.00015436731,6.701808e-7,0.00013690846,0.00000844823],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020925874,0.000008771355,0.00076970924,0.0000132262885,0.000009593824,0.0000030850513,0.7960975,0.0000020977784,9.584875e-7,0.2022714,0.00010260068,0.00070011854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013033685,0.00035684594,0.0047084517,0.0005975839,0.000030020008,0.00009383582,0.07958111,0.00008925619,0.000048765476,0.2139698,0.69898075,0.00024018937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23407736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94474566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7165164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003038114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067001116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904371036","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.30.3.005","title":"Still Making Canada White: Racial Governmentality and the “Good Immigrant” in Canadian Parliamentary Immigration Debates","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Parliament; Political science; Immigration law; Refugee; Immigration policy; Politics; Law; Racism; Immigration reform; Hegemony; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.010040770440507423,"score_gpt":0.24181742631852723,"score_spread":0.23177665587801982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904371036","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97168523,0.00076699565,0.000013337567,0.021054316,0.00044307034,0.00027772228,0.000058238307,0.0000022970294,0.005698812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99527264,0.00018447121,0.000014015668,0.0035939822,0.00041990526,0.000009846252,0.0000055037626,0.000008358208,0.0004912677],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983165,0.00043822106,0.00037720831,0.00013386639,0.00022875103,0.0005054115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988715,0.00015480325,0.00023080257,0.00011065429,0.00011263784,0.0005195981],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026461806,0.0001265039,0.0002582686,0.00008941622,0.000703827,0.0002613655,0.0002321533,0.00006902557,0.00015185402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002102422,0.00008654942,0.000046411544,0.0001834457,0.0008577956,0.0003483547,0.000009329069,0.00022550517,9.492635e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027674992,0.000009895831,0.08673257,0.000016114825,0.000092764734,0.000037361664,0.523173,0.000010019041,0.000005046186,0.3843713,0.0022145442,0.00306067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0059015183,0.00023684306,0.08963602,0.00029865038,0.000106097854,0.00012815816,0.30245245,0.0008601298,0.00004696121,0.06642433,0.5333053,0.0006035583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9984905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53109074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021026842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030785315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5498446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904925197","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.30.3.006","title":"Minimizing and Denying Racial Violence: Insights from the Québec Mosque Shooting","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Mythology; Scholarship; White (mutation); Sociology; Criminology; Race (biology); Gender studies; Political science; Law; History","score_opus":0.06809946995583482,"score_gpt":0.32325302231798314,"score_spread":0.2551535523621483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904925197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9777348,0.001493668,0.000015807695,0.017040752,0.0003836051,0.00012705449,0.000009344893,0.0000053302056,0.0031896152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99067956,0.00012141276,0.000069385766,0.0070434487,0.0015155753,0.0000028379868,9.600752e-7,0.000009770542,0.0005570574],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986971,0.00033416462,0.000295775,0.00012826125,0.00014682254,0.00039786668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849534,0.0004871324,0.0002217919,0.00011452427,0.00018923036,0.00049199397],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010085084,0.00011081173,0.0002153525,0.00004635908,0.0013262803,0.00036902228,0.00029629396,0.00007406119,0.00006156712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056756195,0.00007006348,0.00005282228,0.00008164786,0.0016083224,0.00028039172,0.000024253046,0.00023419088,0.0000036568838],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021562359,0.0000033605415,0.009137677,0.0000050722256,0.00006474705,0.000015568901,0.8364903,0.000004756587,0.000024561823,0.15259182,0.0003294127,0.001311211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027975922,0.00011474317,0.050284553,0.00063722365,0.00014288852,0.00012672125,0.5459682,0.00041385563,0.0001373551,0.08760484,0.3111693,0.0006027393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46135065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9364722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47512156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078614865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017167798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904997941","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.30.3.008","title":"Ethics of Accountability: <i>Gladue</i>, Race, and the Limits of Reparative Justice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Accountability; Economic Justice; Race (biology); Criminal justice; Set (abstract data type); Criminology; Sociology; Law; Political science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.05210967274313985,"score_gpt":0.33790925425338103,"score_spread":0.2857995815102412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904997941","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96778226,0.0012741245,0.00006518538,0.0136591755,0.00030966217,0.00012787686,0.000013752899,0.0000019991598,0.016765961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967846,0.0011725135,0.00003722373,0.0010583864,0.000290186,0.0000033115466,2.7971228e-7,0.000005189469,0.00064827356],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851376,0.0005828215,0.00037185533,0.000101652746,0.00018818268,0.00024172338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99695915,0.0015971657,0.00040267047,0.00017048958,0.00062583614,0.00024466595],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00529079,0.000083517734,0.0003936291,0.000093851304,0.0006667711,0.00008410484,0.00025850156,0.00008297359,0.00006455721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014529099,0.000053446714,0.0001042437,0.00033605503,0.003510901,0.00017198121,0.000019269457,0.0003413477,0.0000010784091],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036177094,0.000014987041,0.00050290936,0.000068466725,0.00016824299,0.0000048940983,0.5803346,0.000008643243,0.000009177767,0.41594088,0.00021733834,0.0023681086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001632755,0.00026756612,0.0005549747,0.00016452983,0.0011266558,0.00007180548,0.91105276,0.00010975837,0.00006962513,0.052677765,0.032129783,0.00014199656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06947458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5528409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4833663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011975293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080991426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905201652","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.30.3.002","title":"Race, Space, and Prostitution: The Making of Settler Colonial Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Indigenous; Legitimation; Race (biology); Making-of; Gender studies; Normalization (sociology); Sociology; State (computer science); Criminology; Political science; Ethnology; Law; Anthropology; Politics","score_opus":0.01315633658383079,"score_gpt":0.2296324466290228,"score_spread":0.21647611004519202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905201652","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7897388,0.0026190777,0.000009182454,0.13565226,0.0015117163,0.00029489165,0.0000820787,0.0000034880775,0.070088506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918447,0.00008114931,0.000012492803,0.0020887204,0.0004866073,0.000002487414,3.1365602e-7,0.0000053249128,0.00547818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991348,0.00014766109,0.00019103831,0.00007550909,0.00014640702,0.00030463212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991798,0.00009316888,0.00019258061,0.00010014683,0.00014078498,0.00029352156],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012700976,0.00006249019,0.00019482535,0.00011485017,0.0012924535,0.00023620696,0.00021914305,0.000046932586,0.000171313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001820935,0.00005105238,0.000035798945,0.00016511769,0.0029657232,0.00013609316,0.000014066898,0.00017889593,0.0000013928756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005544206,0.0000030673637,0.0010688868,0.000020305491,0.000055514527,0.000058862744,0.08911107,0.000002783799,0.0000028224224,0.88041013,0.0284223,0.00078881555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045006952,0.000044239452,0.002448643,0.000055746972,0.00002278954,0.0000821327,0.0048866877,0.0000041741055,0.0000016343921,0.012956891,0.97897303,0.00007396762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97485906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95055073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011072997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063016196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905478810","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.30.3.009","title":"“Making It Right,” Keeping It White: Race and the Demand for Queer Redress","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"African Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intersectionality; Queer; Redress; Scholarship; Politics; Racism; Inclusion (mineral); Gender studies; Sociology; Lesbian; White (mutation); Transgender; Political science; Oppression; Subordination (linguistics); Race (biology); Law","score_opus":0.0469775425461275,"score_gpt":0.31816381070333316,"score_spread":0.27118626815720565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905478810","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55929935,0.0052322964,0.00074530905,0.28297156,0.0011148546,0.000817318,0.000045778943,0.000014632222,0.14975889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9788451,0.00021373677,0.00010331119,0.0062919017,0.0011645883,0.000012177116,4.3412058e-7,0.0000142255785,0.013354505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848306,0.0003633899,0.00032118123,0.00013796595,0.00014869301,0.00054570945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829495,0.0006973468,0.0002809283,0.0001439898,0.00018251174,0.00040025575],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043864413,0.00011999687,0.00037762462,0.00007032651,0.001479009,0.00042356222,0.00036239708,0.00007445323,0.0002050287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037565082,0.00007572664,0.00007832071,0.00012955234,0.00212459,0.0002336014,0.000028282251,0.00019488773,0.000002233678],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015433649,0.0000025923068,0.00031465167,0.0000198423,0.00007793579,0.0000123379305,0.44878194,0.0000028722097,4.4991577e-7,0.54416203,0.0058622933,0.00060873054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018573771,0.00010340222,0.00019859162,0.00015948195,0.000052524705,0.00006170256,0.17344184,0.00006887869,0.0000024711655,0.10533788,0.71855646,0.00015937102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009262985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2037934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71269417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017932858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036010655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970564397","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.31.2.05","title":"The <i>Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines</i>, Soft Law, and the Procedural Rule of Law","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Law; Art","score_opus":0.029884460921857023,"score_gpt":0.277993477525192,"score_spread":0.24810901660333495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970564397","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6069674,0.030898724,0.0000017527001,0.28882194,0.0019024825,0.0007627602,0.00007443894,0.000007541388,0.070562966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96419346,0.0023939963,0.000035113106,0.011665485,0.0006878939,0.000014255973,0.0000012737019,0.000021283375,0.020987218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997231,0.00055892597,0.0008069164,0.00019982494,0.0003513943,0.0008519141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99700123,0.0010183003,0.00065975904,0.00021921837,0.0005067148,0.00059480575],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004564368,0.00026375297,0.00072443055,0.0000259525,0.0016448261,0.0003115274,0.0006811814,0.00014770517,0.0001505008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044053662,0.00013489486,0.00024214466,0.00017272598,0.0074466364,0.0004093141,0.00009335402,0.0005650549,0.000016416236],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018547011,0.000010861655,0.00059669535,0.000082496845,0.00027905262,0.00001746658,0.09508956,0.000016669843,0.000005515917,0.89880246,0.0035305338,0.0013831999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040415176,0.00020166366,0.0006921867,0.00026244196,0.0001752147,0.00022513342,0.07105262,0.00006201394,0.000013473744,0.1152197,0.80775326,0.00030075738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09898392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26710534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80422276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003799275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006566514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989790847","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.31.2.01","title":"The Merits of Restricting Provocation to Indictable Offences: A Critical Analysis of Provocation Law Reform in Canada and New South Wales, Australia","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.043302588606323224,"score_gpt":0.295496901347456,"score_spread":0.25219431274113274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989790847","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9848348,0.0015315204,0.000015976877,0.0053766766,0.00037166165,0.00029557923,0.000038851285,8.422556e-7,0.007534076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99815875,0.00018656925,0.00007842371,0.00028905342,0.00006516213,0.0000052274263,0.0000016660146,0.0000060230927,0.0012091427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824363,0.00025533306,0.00062895153,0.0001463732,0.00024355849,0.00048217722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984156,0.00033098288,0.00039716082,0.00015468402,0.00020987299,0.0004917385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022619984,0.00011494676,0.0004585836,0.0001665024,0.0002362926,0.00009518368,0.0003047244,0.000071869894,0.000029485187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025320402,0.00008403668,0.000058045494,0.0009449941,0.00061451504,0.00027117998,0.000021373868,0.0002454991,9.796426e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073298994,0.0000097394195,0.037352175,0.00012608591,0.00017482472,0.000007048728,0.08239648,0.00015974203,0.000015160437,0.8779353,0.000039276558,0.0017108878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003532576,0.0011340022,0.47263396,0.0036908768,0.0015293597,0.00008218076,0.37535018,0.0030974369,0.00031248998,0.12100878,0.016605387,0.0010227647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98808235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9942737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7569265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001197931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003374968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5987048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990208315","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.31.2.06","title":"Toxic Conceptions: The Assessment and Regulation of Male-Mediated Transgenerational Effects of Chemical Exposures","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Ethnology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.009383315466052249,"score_gpt":0.2735271704254171,"score_spread":0.2641438549593648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990208315","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9887905,0.0035110523,0.000025150577,0.006211985,0.00025585305,0.00028919603,0.000034688303,0.0000010497365,0.0008805308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99828035,0.00035401073,0.0001896182,0.00029315942,0.00009759555,0.0000063120224,0.000005767484,0.000009550901,0.0007636236],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988195,0.00020741609,0.000412772,0.00012616217,0.000170635,0.00026353233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837327,0.00086046977,0.00032446178,0.00014339174,0.00003914191,0.00025927633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008522615,0.00012745488,0.00034696085,0.000036549554,0.000079366306,0.00003997615,0.00018665886,0.00007161042,0.00050102256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009637683,0.0000825069,0.000093302566,0.00009399735,0.001078426,0.00015170353,0.000022876735,0.00022598366,0.0000030128642],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026768344,0.00020617616,0.09210605,0.0013552835,0.0006034493,0.000050673465,0.02115961,0.002110623,0.53227043,0.34030125,0.0015437198,0.008025059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.032521546,0.0040245554,0.58787024,0.0054731634,0.0011337827,0.0033788695,0.0072949743,0.010209602,0.1973259,0.12376079,0.025208568,0.0017980129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016269619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009974759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4957642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016678486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014892175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5485846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990477602","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.31.2.03","title":"The “Statutory Rape” Myth: A Case Law Study of Sexual Assaults against Adolescent Girls","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Tribunal; Political science; Art; Law","score_opus":0.03593079952204512,"score_gpt":0.28595120987275197,"score_spread":0.2500204103507068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990477602","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9561862,0.008970241,0.0000047024223,0.016052501,0.00260338,0.00061768544,0.000053468895,0.0000054691045,0.015506386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9819953,0.00051682687,0.000008219766,0.0026438292,0.00048613688,0.000009648582,0.0000011567904,0.000022703292,0.014316174],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99690104,0.0010220177,0.000738948,0.00022432895,0.00036768656,0.00074598164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971279,0.00078496063,0.00067337725,0.000289228,0.00042484974,0.00069969293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037140492,0.00024299491,0.0006468268,0.000096855125,0.0012897004,0.00029174687,0.00044288614,0.00012700069,0.000069051915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016386494,0.00016694258,0.00010289169,0.0003846969,0.0016112783,0.00031436895,0.000056522695,0.00057272165,0.0000149672005],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038418308,0.00033431593,0.009243953,0.0001726421,0.0011637255,0.001180384,0.5610782,0.0004651705,0.0000051252036,0.41022077,0.0042223376,0.011529198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005386494,0.0011129901,0.0014713083,0.00020092506,0.0002054924,0.00045893504,0.59826344,0.00012987766,0.0000022568374,0.0036602442,0.3887581,0.0003499518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038709994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37813532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40656054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052273757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008037186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9919463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990965028","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.31.2.02","title":"United by the Problem, Divided by the Solution: How the Issue of Indigenous Women in Prostitution Was Represented at the Deliberations on Canada’s Bill C-36","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Ethnology; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.01637661060907061,"score_gpt":0.23196044638827581,"score_spread":0.2155838357792052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990965028","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61971956,0.009132334,0.0000014665726,0.36560595,0.000612067,0.00085163565,0.000065614135,0.0000028499155,0.0040085237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9084606,0.0012154038,0.0000016551337,0.0044248947,0.00022044913,0.000041956675,0.000015198529,0.000017439714,0.08560237],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963445,0.0015640747,0.00052685133,0.00021096766,0.00042687295,0.00092672836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974207,0.00094738073,0.00057485857,0.00045282368,0.00022215772,0.00038206618],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042298734,0.00022826709,0.00038550777,0.00008983201,0.0022420038,0.0002992121,0.0009111525,0.00017546596,0.00023585492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022265554,0.0000939917,0.000099331664,0.00095202617,0.0021061155,0.00020081378,0.000060481547,0.0009272825,0.000008990887],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025984793,0.000071515766,0.0024829737,0.000046080906,0.00060262415,0.000033222543,0.82868433,0.0018570262,0.00004486965,0.041484933,0.1217809,0.0026516754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011823833,0.00021142261,0.000602239,0.0002260584,0.00007363082,0.00011636383,0.106071874,0.00015475405,0.000060201444,0.011270343,0.87983847,0.00019226373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80996555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9251324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7580576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021060805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025698082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99905694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991106457","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.31.2.04","title":"Assessing Sexually Harassing Conduct in the Workplace: An Analysis of BC Human Rights Tribunal Decisions in 2010–16","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Hill's Pet Nutrition","keywords":"Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.0868209108119748,"score_gpt":0.3633437076925173,"score_spread":0.2765227968805425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991106457","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9796911,0.0021939708,0.00004796532,0.010130368,0.00072435284,0.00019667395,0.000021677733,0.000001940904,0.006991949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99555236,0.00009743827,0.000056469024,0.0006055458,0.00018175125,0.000003751115,0.0000070634837,0.000009685483,0.003485963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99669486,0.0014008734,0.00079771725,0.00020745627,0.0003217661,0.0005772951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99728805,0.0013445988,0.00057579624,0.0002244776,0.00020872074,0.00035834248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061765136,0.00018427304,0.0008320492,0.0006208119,0.0007405233,0.0004729786,0.0005308841,0.00014779023,0.0003598241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018975504,0.00012522345,0.0001465655,0.0018640509,0.0009257684,0.00089968793,0.000024539528,0.0005536232,0.0000033412123],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000115349474,0.00018231657,0.19130558,0.000029967372,0.0010170288,0.00012279883,0.38797918,0.0038052034,0.000017992827,0.4112419,0.0005326809,0.0036500022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0068082474,0.00052174495,0.29148147,0.0010185099,0.0011143286,0.000083172104,0.5158144,0.0025815773,0.000008379949,0.12693106,0.052857563,0.0007795405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08370377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7485611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6648573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066132395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005816275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9223979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991221444","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.31.2.07","title":"Vulnerable Targets: Trans Prisoner Safety, the Law, and Sexual Violence in the Prison System","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.01493657488181083,"score_gpt":0.24425736384833216,"score_spread":0.22932078896652133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991221444","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.930293,0.017878106,0.00010644999,0.03798437,0.0009651586,0.00035930512,0.000028812445,0.0000036275121,0.012381148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922011,0.0021580912,0.000012065958,0.0024843845,0.00038049143,0.00001155466,9.742939e-7,0.000012618105,0.002738733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972349,0.0012157434,0.00048639995,0.00019779125,0.00024058319,0.0006246041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825066,0.0007733583,0.00027013422,0.0002488384,0.000102379956,0.0003546303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054614446,0.00018184722,0.00045761268,0.0000964356,0.0011207612,0.00036796465,0.0005542213,0.000118065625,0.00013670919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006386821,0.00010663188,0.00011957704,0.00048564744,0.0010054887,0.00032538932,0.000019837848,0.0007906401,0.000011942107],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000115150666,0.00003434571,0.0015490564,0.00021264389,0.0001767024,0.00008879217,0.38562664,0.0004636054,0.0000040730743,0.5934052,0.00022601734,0.018097766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008747332,0.00022024005,0.00054475357,0.00051061367,0.00036475112,0.0003962817,0.89611495,0.0008438758,0.0000019135953,0.0061746556,0.0937572,0.00019602606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26921862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7074346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58723056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051511376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004467384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8620102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3007472026","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.31.2.10","title":"Patricia Cochran, <i>Common Sense and Legal Judgment: Community Knowledge, Political Power, and Rhetorical Practice</i>","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Common sense; Politics; Power (physics); Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.019411038484253018,"score_gpt":0.29228229032161884,"score_spread":0.2728712518373658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3007472026","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8234168,0.0046291803,0.0000016948034,0.028526317,0.00038661933,0.00017213418,0.000017892073,0.0000069007547,0.14284244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912706,0.000856958,0.0000301528,0.0053019742,0.0002271367,0.0000022352501,0.0000010728986,0.000010727054,0.002299132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978888,0.0010176332,0.0002649442,0.00011032866,0.00016195739,0.0005563404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99726045,0.001203446,0.00016219485,0.000151316,0.00016483471,0.0010577411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029831235,0.00013262383,0.00036755935,0.000021053545,0.0010043484,0.00032130154,0.00017136385,0.00016033534,0.00005381197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041204575,0.00010063641,0.00007855042,0.00015648305,0.0010445039,0.00041327783,0.000048188514,0.00088304444,0.0000054376205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007019936,0.000037775753,0.00096479256,0.000029714407,0.000070374655,0.00006550213,0.08476664,3.9463413e-7,0.0000030037545,0.9123908,0.0013092316,0.00029154445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025314256,0.00030140654,0.001111114,0.00011506664,0.00009200922,0.0010819406,0.13464472,0.000008026041,0.000004317955,0.08076858,0.7790817,0.0002596917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019443741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040532276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83162224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034506439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004572153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9870859},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013034108","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.32.1.08","title":"Implicitly Feminist?: The Supreme Court of Canada’s Decision in <i>R v Jarvis</i>","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Humanities; Supreme court; Philosophy; Mythology; Ethnology; Political science; Sociology; Law; Theology","score_opus":0.03559986611675531,"score_gpt":0.27180183418093856,"score_spread":0.23620196806418325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013034108","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50996155,0.012997819,0.00005965664,0.43572113,0.0016614038,0.0003173904,0.00013119492,0.0000031175266,0.03914673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98460054,0.00070664095,0.000027931977,0.012442572,0.00041882327,0.0000033884196,7.876935e-7,0.000012989334,0.0017863141],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806744,0.00033122278,0.0006114611,0.00014035507,0.00029749342,0.00055205426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977323,0.0008374835,0.000386178,0.00012656355,0.00020180002,0.00071569026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019276777,0.00015697174,0.0005205151,0.000054289343,0.00048758302,0.000097375625,0.0005070947,0.00008563938,0.0001698743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047590755,0.00010846365,0.000085574524,0.00048657585,0.0009270713,0.00014182266,0.000041503572,0.00038639907,0.0000022344034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028676103,0.000026859205,0.01320414,0.00007982547,0.0002587033,0.0001465061,0.39887786,0.0006055181,0.0000048735114,0.53242064,0.048298344,0.0057899747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019781701,0.00018828397,0.0040554754,0.00021099653,0.000062547915,0.000067613735,0.11637362,0.0002637284,0.000009547692,0.029388163,0.84717834,0.0002235253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68146515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9842728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054138567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032324232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.573418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013383626","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.32.1.07","title":"“You Start to Feel Like You’re Losing Your Mind”: An Intersectionality-Based Policy Analysis of Federal Correctional Segregation Policy and Practice","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Intersectionality; Sociology; Ethnology; Art; Gender studies","score_opus":0.06068259167205629,"score_gpt":0.3351809118305336,"score_spread":0.2744983201584773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013383626","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8509123,0.0007955786,0.0015716957,0.1434069,0.0006652765,0.00015342855,0.0001648108,0.000004968494,0.0023250792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849175,0.00013960095,0.00033772129,0.012113817,0.0013014077,0.0000050352514,0.000016506037,0.000016869004,0.0011515033],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99733806,0.00087765895,0.00064097514,0.00029467297,0.0003451602,0.0005034537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963716,0.0006621361,0.00062629394,0.00015609982,0.00068807666,0.0014957904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020423615,0.00021850588,0.0006319873,0.000948442,0.0008512978,0.00046659223,0.00024956744,0.0001303613,0.00026507367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016794762,0.00021241128,0.0003100795,0.00291886,0.000724602,0.00077557977,0.000029543631,0.0004143195,0.000003878782],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019150618,0.00024280876,0.0051119183,0.0002005888,0.004387595,0.0001124105,0.76054513,0.023123445,0.000053158303,0.14740893,0.00078939256,0.05610955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016413134,0.0010812423,0.0024810152,0.00022500145,0.0050892266,0.00028537516,0.8880502,0.011111299,0.00001677166,0.0052658827,0.08424021,0.00051247916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35063243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.56144685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21081442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012555924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027004497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86618805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013560808","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.32.1.11","title":"Melanie Randall, Jennifer Koshan, and Patricia Nyaundi, eds, <i>The Right to Say No: Marital Rape and Law Reform in Canada, Ghana, Kenya and Malawi</i>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Political science; Law; Criminology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.01457874213680791,"score_gpt":0.21906301153678318,"score_spread":0.20448426939997527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013560808","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88093334,0.0062688366,0.000002381871,0.07872969,0.0002834626,0.00035165943,0.00006831711,0.0000043416953,0.033357996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98262584,0.00090747565,0.000014531155,0.015374968,0.00033823567,0.000006650274,0.0000014681289,0.0000139354315,0.0007168828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983938,0.00022587043,0.00034534422,0.0002151816,0.0002162647,0.00060356315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998127,0.00018870224,0.00013475705,0.00011628113,0.00008796428,0.001345292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013272119,0.00017867207,0.00042331003,0.000070677925,0.0006123893,0.00031045123,0.00031015257,0.00008449849,0.00008803097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009661848,0.00012549135,0.00004387474,0.00021331618,0.00046983076,0.00021687386,0.000057630605,0.00037443574,0.0000016565905],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068304164,0.000025809972,0.03254058,0.00017834458,0.00031344627,0.0009818694,0.339646,0.000005800418,0.00001851494,0.6128706,0.00612662,0.006609376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0050051864,0.00034596486,0.01841163,0.00012490926,0.0000995033,0.0002821378,0.06374834,0.0000679453,0.000012581541,0.026237117,0.8850543,0.0006104249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8860686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99629813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87892765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047095874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011395139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51173884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013627713","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.32.1.05","title":"Anti-Veiling and the Charter of Québec Values: “Native Testimonials,” Erasure, and Violence against Montreal’s Muslim Women","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.06364592074912166,"score_gpt":0.29873838385221085,"score_spread":0.23509246310308918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013627713","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8974055,0.007912097,0.000010132404,0.092694424,0.00026460073,0.0003213863,0.00008486496,0.0000043638997,0.0013026361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982616,0.0031833227,0.00002720543,0.012514069,0.00048647984,0.00000858909,0.0000013119778,0.000018025137,0.0011449764],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755186,0.0007411646,0.0006004607,0.00023066542,0.00022474819,0.0006511273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99711674,0.00079170644,0.00053775357,0.00014116557,0.00031634196,0.0010962626],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022665514,0.00023882382,0.00069673895,0.00006779227,0.00057056395,0.00026872562,0.00032374667,0.00011532809,0.0000503047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00081048824,0.00015911601,0.00009858943,0.00017472636,0.0047559678,0.00036674764,0.000039578368,0.00039109346,0.0000019217844],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006867131,0.000013196051,0.0032012865,0.00010171983,0.00024398872,0.000031882922,0.9514094,0.00008917235,0.000016378448,0.041901037,0.00024433955,0.0026789443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009357353,0.0004312456,0.035473958,0.0011496954,0.00030319445,0.0001959697,0.88646007,0.004598491,0.000054125994,0.035986945,0.02524286,0.0007461236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20926094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25026157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.085210524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087109813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017937706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013794120","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.32.1.02","title":"Re-Imagining “Serving Time” in Indigenous Communities","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.03136097003313112,"score_gpt":0.2649811365706912,"score_spread":0.2336201665375601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013794120","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7797703,0.012932952,0.000004746855,0.080274716,0.0010953036,0.0002894807,0.000024354893,0.000005983064,0.12560216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97882694,0.006897154,0.000063109954,0.004438927,0.0011010169,0.0000015890432,0.0000037822565,0.00002416668,0.008643305],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99712056,0.0010565757,0.000576966,0.00011741763,0.00016416475,0.00096431415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997632,0.00047008708,0.00038832097,0.00016082931,0.00015553537,0.0011932106],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033054443,0.00017587996,0.0005084898,0.00016290143,0.003279515,0.00025926562,0.00062121905,0.00014423278,0.00046393182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024092535,0.0001500041,0.00009106858,0.00042203206,0.0011811093,0.00045856618,0.000004694816,0.00083962973,0.000036758232],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024779729,0.000014791124,0.0006898695,0.000096468226,0.00004079533,0.000071857794,0.7673039,0.000031445976,8.1786276e-8,0.23114759,0.00006865963,0.0005097933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089320174,0.00017343492,0.0002908883,0.00042508251,0.000031890857,0.00009012789,0.36568633,0.000090326816,0.0000016534427,0.036982972,0.5951165,0.0002176173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7372061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9884384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59504783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010537043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01592943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013841376","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.32.1.06","title":"How Much Is That Gamete in the Window? Embryos, Policy, and the Law","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.048112059935623945,"score_gpt":0.27056691512614367,"score_spread":0.22245485519051972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013841376","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.305361,0.05027432,0.0000059809367,0.63772476,0.00034620074,0.00049649965,0.000039755574,0.0000055537985,0.0057459567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9184675,0.0059275716,0.000027792958,0.07198831,0.0014367609,0.000018195606,0.0000012809169,0.000024946568,0.0021076393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99750507,0.0005874096,0.00043914968,0.000291321,0.00022371126,0.00095336896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99741715,0.0007685371,0.00035381503,0.00047732925,0.00010624494,0.00087691966],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032808173,0.0002699595,0.00080549705,0.00016019947,0.0003767963,0.0003348298,0.00055955857,0.00017874906,0.00003800193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013845948,0.00014209712,0.00015046773,0.0004682112,0.0031625172,0.00025267355,0.000064438704,0.0013938341,0.0000056414974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055896374,0.000015857848,0.001721699,0.00028945346,0.00020028919,0.00045357656,0.07412654,0.0000015504523,0.000007648615,0.91214883,0.0035320274,0.0069435476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011586277,0.0008570151,0.004523373,0.0006333543,0.00022070057,0.0038017677,0.09634008,0.00008001539,0.00014386018,0.34095567,0.54055274,0.00030514988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019463303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020462118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6131065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036030894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010114952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014022327","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.32.1.03","title":"Workplace Sexual Harassment and the “Unwelcome” Requirement: An Analysis of BC Human Rights Tribunal Decisions from 2010 to 2016","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06606583455891739,"score_gpt":0.3184238201100739,"score_spread":0.2523579855511565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014022327","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86657906,0.004646331,0.00046485142,0.12485806,0.00068959885,0.00031830158,0.00025444126,0.000004730011,0.0021846218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907619,0.00030372888,0.00011586705,0.0030560812,0.0005928332,0.000008751451,0.000011233586,0.000011621832,0.0051380186],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973493,0.00080426526,0.0007336336,0.0002643829,0.00035385162,0.00049454207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967271,0.00098188,0.00050201657,0.00021594483,0.0002549182,0.0013181415],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00248517,0.00021222251,0.0008990854,0.00019869921,0.001336807,0.00026854113,0.00050978875,0.00010584697,0.0006077442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002186951,0.00013616071,0.00015459952,0.00095735036,0.0014981286,0.00032269993,0.00007050745,0.0003249858,0.0000067459528],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00085778313,0.00008599935,0.009943337,0.000018280589,0.0047315443,0.000054929555,0.49315828,0.0011179742,0.000011808665,0.47777414,0.0090305535,0.003215377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.017308645,0.0019190878,0.040659346,0.00049829704,0.00623054,0.000024330862,0.2369546,0.004362507,0.000019881865,0.15767275,0.53317446,0.0011755815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09293307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41504645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5241439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002847267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029096496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3029563345","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.32.2.01","title":"Breaking the Silence on Father-Daughter Sexual Abuse of Adolescent Girls: A Case Law Study","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Sexual behavior; Sexual abuse; Poison control; Psychology; Art; Suicide prevention; Social psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.0691734720317803,"score_gpt":0.31764933231429154,"score_spread":0.24847586028251123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3029563345","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.965164,0.003995967,0.000014729183,0.024457695,0.0012539024,0.00062397454,0.00013707347,0.000013272754,0.0043393928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865142,0.000049884387,0.000011351863,0.010746158,0.0005555286,0.000020344676,0.0000012367417,0.000050324088,0.0020509723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99657273,0.0011136313,0.00088706723,0.0003849072,0.00020275329,0.000838934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973011,0.0004624998,0.00064976997,0.0006427671,0.00015315023,0.00079070975],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019848458,0.00035177157,0.00082784897,0.00014279092,0.00036020685,0.00014629272,0.0008254719,0.0002556673,0.00028098657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000098235905,0.00025182997,0.00015418063,0.0003220582,0.0016791773,0.00012546939,0.000059042526,0.0013666138,0.000024014733],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000613727,0.000683572,0.007907518,0.00013217669,0.000612793,0.010254301,0.43689188,0.000020426542,0.000027740463,0.53185016,0.00085600704,0.010149687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.018746154,0.0088462215,0.0050628604,0.0008141661,0.0011886163,0.03442139,0.6622639,0.00009753033,0.00010044081,0.016176624,0.25113404,0.0011480949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040257946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10036608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5156735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002995767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026242572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3106691758","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.32.2.06","title":"Against Amnesia: African Nova Scotia Women’s Generational Leadership in Civil Rights Organizing, 1950–79","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Humanities; Ethnology; Political science; Civil rights; Sociology; Gender studies; Art; Law","score_opus":0.06067501945083909,"score_gpt":0.21924930636942014,"score_spread":0.15857428691858105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3106691758","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71865577,0.0126939975,0.000012227289,0.23286,0.0022565695,0.00025172456,0.00012097485,0.000008534319,0.03314018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9707842,0.00030551545,0.00002743093,0.014976501,0.001740886,0.0000044583735,0.00000474516,0.000028607255,0.012127641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99712086,0.0005189795,0.0006211644,0.0002813674,0.0003050239,0.00115262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99669915,0.00016838669,0.00037601573,0.00015529059,0.00015462941,0.002446549],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018400964,0.000230992,0.0006040628,0.0004796229,0.00088411814,0.00079176656,0.000590108,0.00020579678,0.0029035767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002336825,0.00025381992,0.0001473682,0.00086937397,0.0026231788,0.00055998197,0.000025402265,0.00081143575,0.00011681972],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074950425,0.000031494987,0.0008427288,0.00012994719,0.00014874767,0.0008447758,0.4573385,0.00010537132,0.000011542778,0.52128685,0.018241612,0.0009434457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019972557,0.00015611919,0.00093675527,0.00022317655,0.00004597629,0.0001221644,0.04119345,0.00007503144,0.0000031890538,0.022343783,0.93248653,0.00041654657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.54981065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9957581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91424495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066970023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052610254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3106939773","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.32.2.03","title":"Stories and the Participation of Indigenous Women in Natural Resource Governance","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Indigenous; Ethnology; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.015410574692817177,"score_gpt":0.20898962802197457,"score_spread":0.1935790533291574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3106939773","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94562566,0.027297752,0.000015171351,0.02367062,0.0002824569,0.0001693793,0.000017805225,0.0000033898557,0.0029177587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99635905,0.0006699665,0.00002329855,0.00090144493,0.00022170953,0.000010089124,6.640973e-7,0.000018531826,0.0017952223],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986251,0.00021590963,0.00041777085,0.000102489954,0.00011797358,0.0005207681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989197,0.0002422776,0.000240695,0.00012174941,0.00003199686,0.00044353257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00155933,0.00014260337,0.00044705652,0.000053216387,0.000120351346,0.00009217353,0.00022449755,0.000060344155,0.0000309722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021521568,0.00010040108,0.000054682467,0.00019096251,0.0005390945,0.00009205411,0.000034518678,0.0004644267,0.0000012535502],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004218027,0.000010255258,0.0018780422,0.00044934844,0.00029337115,0.00012515245,0.8286581,0.008727816,0.0000056802023,0.14983305,0.00041938515,0.00917796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.023565285,0.0010937491,0.045187984,0.002039917,0.0003369898,0.00041104178,0.1852234,0.020690164,0.00010917944,0.02618135,0.6941352,0.0010257423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052361293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009584285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6937158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004702984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001297595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7915496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108218546","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.32.2.05","title":"Call the Midwife: Privatization and Health Care Reform in an Era of Constrained Public Spending","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.06369944032872378,"score_gpt":0.3000675512639944,"score_spread":0.23636811093527066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108218546","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63214487,0.006288527,0.000010806535,0.35824,0.00026670704,0.00016326382,0.000029959314,0.0000013575217,0.0028544923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939452,0.0010838681,0.00004848349,0.0044509685,0.0003107733,0.0000017940968,0.0000013196131,0.000006258519,0.00015137586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984872,0.0003304292,0.00040094496,0.0001298117,0.0001882066,0.00046344288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841446,0.00010373273,0.00050845294,0.00007681306,0.000092927294,0.0008036444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002108847,0.00009892206,0.00032729402,0.00003325487,0.0004559374,0.00019121068,0.00036163078,0.00007045078,0.000046734196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001757925,0.000069791815,0.000048139882,0.0005043522,0.0015540944,0.00048882375,0.0000217721,0.00035483815,4.1912276e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014312197,0.000004844456,0.015832819,0.000045467525,0.000014061025,0.000010935664,0.33868408,0.000009563152,0.000001014264,0.63699216,0.00010357711,0.008287142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036405511,0.0010641927,0.111349605,0.00073789357,0.000038909275,0.00009436036,0.7179538,0.00073732354,0.000005877354,0.060626216,0.103305705,0.00044558817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17700961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7811932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6041836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009359137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018105939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82847077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3109532656","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.32.2.07","title":"Suzanne Zaccour, <i>La fabrique du viol</i>, Montréal, Leméac, 2019.","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.024816780961681918,"score_gpt":0.24242419461433629,"score_spread":0.21760741365265437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3109532656","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23935445,0.06622,0.000094050934,0.6691166,0.0013345483,0.00023051658,0.00007333871,0.000010308452,0.023566194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9607687,0.013869912,0.00005221641,0.015249333,0.0019243959,0.0000052490673,0.000001661016,0.000030646046,0.008097905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997305,0.00068340375,0.00059468136,0.00024920018,0.00025120185,0.0009165533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962178,0.0006519498,0.000421362,0.00018288907,0.00020610506,0.0023199301],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028734845,0.00026432687,0.0006649992,0.000073114956,0.00070059573,0.00048792578,0.00072005595,0.00019973148,0.00053437916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049863773,0.00022630146,0.00026044564,0.00032567236,0.0018251553,0.00070045283,0.000053164833,0.00075873104,0.00008159616],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023165453,0.000027648539,0.0006650723,0.00012050448,0.00016961175,0.0011373104,0.124027126,0.000095949435,0.000011925816,0.7760909,0.08953744,0.007884854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001128633,0.00026267866,0.00025488116,0.00043060322,0.00010982823,0.000612083,0.014170813,0.000114112605,0.000006887173,0.049586948,0.93303996,0.00028259715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15887451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26826754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8435025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049324136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013021218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9228306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3109993298","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.32.2.04","title":"La féminisation du corps professoral des facultés de droit au Québec","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Legal Systems and Institutions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Feminization (sociology); Political science; Legal education; Law; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.03420782737097164,"score_gpt":0.22620202495997516,"score_spread":0.19199419758900352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3109993298","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9381047,0.00024646654,0.00019983371,0.021066075,0.00021472796,0.00014074279,0.000007142234,0.000011068589,0.04000925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99366814,0.00001192533,0.000020372754,0.0047258507,0.0011593271,0.000008726375,0.0000032948633,0.00001391784,0.00038841856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991739,0.000041478816,0.00028027256,0.000095397176,0.000084474086,0.00032452264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993527,0.000047996542,0.00024157944,0.000074369265,0.00011302176,0.00017032024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008411406,0.00010968177,0.00024117989,0.00007990657,0.0004472596,0.00034908025,0.00021404843,0.000058543217,0.000075999276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020877464,0.00008544317,0.00008086664,0.0001679158,0.0003189697,0.00086349476,0.000025591216,0.00023626209,0.000026763415],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076494405,0.00001439716,0.039931227,0.00021558086,0.00007784494,0.00014794711,0.026619146,0.000072127754,0.000016847529,0.92935413,0.0013195348,0.0021546942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033987123,0.00008245235,0.02761196,0.00028757745,0.000119482895,0.00044643503,0.01227445,0.0011725314,0.000008002133,0.061330087,0.892892,0.00037633377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20764355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42448768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8915724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053344166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007949169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7976328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123893219","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.28.2.342","title":"Balancing Transparency and Accountability with Privacy in Improving the Police Handling of Sexual Assaults","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Accountability; Sexual assault; Legislation; Conflation; Context (archaeology); Business; Information privacy; Public relations; Internet privacy; Political science; Computer security; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Law; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.03634624444334696,"score_gpt":0.2969852791501086,"score_spread":0.26063903470676164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123893219","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9875438,0.00011050097,0.00004787116,0.010344144,0.00005925838,0.00010430185,0.000014849035,0.0000018791291,0.0017733553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992335,0.000112590766,0.000030561,0.0003188248,0.00012584578,0.0000027901083,1.2054583e-7,0.0000053362064,0.000170436],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904054,0.00022805888,0.00023259746,0.00008794858,0.00010497139,0.0003059068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874246,0.0006339907,0.00020494619,0.000113126865,0.00006400829,0.00024148604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028330414,0.000068617475,0.000190698,0.00006075427,0.000330178,0.000088501845,0.00020000813,0.000042501262,0.00002852562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017486495,0.0000351597,0.000020012874,0.0001241472,0.0005662932,0.0003666077,0.00000963484,0.00018023627,2.857351e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013463583,0.000013766549,0.09878482,0.000050184208,0.000043883774,0.0000045806255,0.86330783,0.000014094182,0.00028397422,0.027491298,0.000013916491,0.009856986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008225247,0.0007407158,0.6051194,0.0011418241,0.0002101559,0.0003241571,0.33944148,0.000115835064,0.000057174177,0.026355656,0.017652094,0.000616288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.52918154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88491565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5238664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001889258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005784129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4739537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124223264","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.29.1.60","title":"Battered Women under Duress: The Supreme Court of Canada's Abandonment of Context and Purpose in <i>R. v Ryan</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Abandonment (legal); Economic Justice; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Criminology; Political science; History","score_opus":0.01594326684379127,"score_gpt":0.23707592576619305,"score_spread":0.22113265892240178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124223264","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9712191,0.00091669493,0.0000023152154,0.022078501,0.00020362285,0.00020816487,0.00003845774,9.5001997e-7,0.005332163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970073,0.00040265408,0.000003507734,0.0018857674,0.00009524392,0.0000054215698,3.9919928e-7,0.000009319591,0.0005903746],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854493,0.00021511916,0.00043400328,0.000108014305,0.00021208465,0.00048584916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983827,0.000274019,0.00051187293,0.00027588982,0.00008903116,0.00046650504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023425086,0.00011660686,0.00045587777,0.00006211794,0.0005365505,0.00013478934,0.0005777145,0.000057755846,0.00007754569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020664388,0.00007928117,0.000053313557,0.000053143227,0.0012834126,0.00016248153,0.000032635322,0.00022488624,2.2202e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005014892,0.000055288536,0.16107196,0.00010989291,0.00042489122,0.0001705686,0.5087945,0.000071739414,0.000083285646,0.32373023,0.002320097,0.0026660748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014603955,0.00038021372,0.49580565,0.0010435346,0.00013912894,0.0001938927,0.26254317,0.00007260659,0.00039790448,0.11069483,0.113354184,0.0007709026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6992441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9867511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33473372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003948093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014569133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47287872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194929843","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.33.1.03","title":"To Protect and Responsibilize: The Discursive Explosion of Combining Youth Sexuality, Human Trafficking, and Online Spaces","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Protectionism; Vulnerability (computing); Human sexuality; Human trafficking; Criminology; Political science; Sex trafficking; Sociology; Gender studies; Law; Computer security; Business; International trade; Computer science","score_opus":0.04527916886593975,"score_gpt":0.31163503073588217,"score_spread":0.2663558618699424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3194929843","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9696936,0.0028460266,0.0000024253884,0.026187656,0.00012106078,0.00019734,0.000010673657,0.0000035494668,0.00093769014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980358,0.0002938371,0.00003524106,0.00044370344,0.00012260377,0.0000024205215,0.0000015513141,0.000008890597,0.0010559496],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862736,0.00057303807,0.0002534273,0.0001289041,0.00014036646,0.0002768814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989063,0.00027259882,0.00018009453,0.00011963134,0.00011764228,0.00040372193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019701493,0.000093434035,0.0002916433,0.000078211444,0.00068255153,0.00018488192,0.000168448,0.00006910424,0.000020178297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036466014,0.000057486966,0.000040437593,0.00021161958,0.00076098024,0.00010066987,0.000039571914,0.000277546,2.0891821e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008587244,0.000021485066,0.0018768188,0.000024339397,0.000081498714,0.000049568895,0.94353455,0.00001530562,0.00008310499,0.05281184,0.000069213966,0.001346421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015021499,0.00034813498,0.0032741018,0.00058407604,0.000083758016,0.0000831845,0.9433946,0.000008716464,0.00014847938,0.042653028,0.0077397437,0.00018000769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007143644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.088893466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08174982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007479395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032278927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194978617","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.33.1.02","title":"Les tribunaux d’arbitrage dans l’engrenage de la division sexuelle du travail : l’interaction des motifs de discrimination fondée sur l’état civil et le sexe","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018851842516939814,"score_gpt":0.26491208954930445,"score_spread":0.24606024703236465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3194978617","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9050148,0.016712299,0.0006678427,0.02118655,0.0007856252,0.000114941555,0.000022529108,0.000010735769,0.055484656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97848445,0.0072476845,0.00010121554,0.00050231337,0.0002453037,0.0000048242255,0.0000107095275,0.000031366322,0.01337216],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965109,0.0019560733,0.00042567207,0.00021095511,0.00019101599,0.00070536876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99778825,0.000807741,0.00029299533,0.00014551783,0.00020235826,0.00076313154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003772026,0.00021604417,0.0004067239,0.00012811589,0.0011742068,0.0005580797,0.00028431116,0.00028377277,0.0002841477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004928886,0.0001859127,0.00018366943,0.00039747692,0.0012824094,0.00060092576,0.000030179333,0.000892226,0.0000042624183],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007950816,0.00018450295,0.005560911,0.00016116291,0.00031960697,0.0010518408,0.65770614,0.0013221542,0.00020860271,0.30162,0.0009951926,0.030790363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00476844,0.00034399587,0.034023926,0.0019271803,0.00037670168,0.0021677238,0.54165673,0.0028602686,0.00063170143,0.20797059,0.20259947,0.00067327695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07932636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32514533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24581899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011221351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015273535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9268045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195498398","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.33.1.04","title":"Section 28’s Potential to Guarantee Substantive Gender Equality in <i>Hak c Procureur général du Québec</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Gender equality; Charter; Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Action (physics); Order (exchange); Sociology; Constitutional court; Law and economics; Gender studies; Constitution; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.025733274067818057,"score_gpt":0.26755339791935123,"score_spread":0.24182012385153318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195498398","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9386213,0.00142341,0.00014281951,0.028027683,0.00095563015,0.00022050101,0.00002635484,0.000008504181,0.030573819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99519,0.00005694345,0.0000623358,0.0023662804,0.00065560115,0.000008409307,0.0000012003617,0.0000141968285,0.0016450146],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801135,0.0006190605,0.00038581537,0.00018841385,0.00021873647,0.00057664345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987198,0.00014363385,0.00017350909,0.0001494846,0.00026455303,0.0005490367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024388498,0.00012240419,0.00034075155,0.0001147658,0.00039617595,0.00024524718,0.0003185246,0.000098321456,0.00018203608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054236886,0.000109153036,0.000104408544,0.00044622974,0.0004163069,0.00029708905,0.000033057982,0.00041489274,0.000010315346],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001387172,0.000025892865,0.0077997227,0.000017990129,0.00007036313,0.00037117762,0.62694836,0.000094261115,0.000035514688,0.36346713,0.00058942457,0.00044146084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004083901,0.00019370603,0.0062094377,0.00016906987,0.00008196371,0.0002758346,0.117621206,0.000058217793,0.000111955116,0.18322895,0.6873326,0.0006331833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1624403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8094341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68674314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010361357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002583606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8431371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215196532","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.33.2.05","title":"De la fragmentation de la procréation à l’effacement des femmes","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0279250037127664,"score_gpt":0.3086671242685087,"score_spread":0.28074212055574227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3215196532","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8979191,0.045366175,0.00043957133,0.045981202,0.00042517597,0.00024764083,0.000016626893,0.0000102803515,0.009594212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863474,0.005715694,0.0010595821,0.0022231285,0.00048282003,0.000024103274,0.0000055720297,0.000022182263,0.0041195177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979125,0.0007154542,0.00039788283,0.00018023021,0.0001225384,0.00067136035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813277,0.0004995538,0.00025709282,0.00020117023,0.00021131788,0.00069812796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037131615,0.00015720632,0.00037063975,0.00014702651,0.0002774289,0.00018999063,0.00012758111,0.0001896528,0.00015196502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014441197,0.0001336516,0.00008543035,0.00022809689,0.0012105338,0.00018794685,0.000021769785,0.00061702234,0.000005170993],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037244623,0.00014096558,0.050450515,0.0012362285,0.0004884828,0.0017638484,0.05307872,0.00025927267,0.0005694119,0.79963726,0.0021624174,0.08984044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0073143337,0.00081760646,0.0959679,0.002145141,0.00036368586,0.010910744,0.040782034,0.00021869443,0.0043879687,0.6703617,0.16637377,0.00035643668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003969576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034278203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16421136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017619153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028586609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60008377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216492322","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.33.2.01","title":"La judiciarisation criminelle des violences envers les femmes : Vers un droit sensible aux victimes?","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.0389373811365592,"score_gpt":0.2779503228457012,"score_spread":0.239012941709142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3216492322","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94341713,0.019587146,0.00021646089,0.014729041,0.0011609773,0.000086818516,0.000024594052,0.0000084778485,0.020769345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9813972,0.010822574,0.00013506983,0.001018947,0.00051741325,0.0000048459688,0.0000044010703,0.00002077075,0.0060787713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99742067,0.0008322076,0.0005198077,0.0002609198,0.00026780265,0.00069858786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99733084,0.00079653005,0.00038476425,0.0002003259,0.0004663751,0.0008211531],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021680333,0.00023055915,0.0005465857,0.0002353597,0.0015824605,0.000442456,0.0003053455,0.00021356899,0.000965105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004894062,0.0002191296,0.00031571917,0.0008177721,0.0022408897,0.00049896137,0.000034920766,0.0005629639,0.000022331427],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012122882,0.00009501151,0.0026806132,0.00020015334,0.00095244794,0.0009395931,0.36655256,0.0010371596,0.000026668644,0.3796022,0.0008429329,0.24694945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009611674,0.00014503373,0.0010043763,0.00049016735,0.0012215222,0.00065338536,0.83692545,0.0004690037,0.00009692231,0.087011546,0.0706876,0.00033385318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2673728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6301211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47037286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00094672875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002248584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216864938","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.33.2.04","title":"Écrire féministe en droit privé : dialogue sur une démarche parsemée d’embûches","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.059134899173038435,"score_gpt":0.2863735943244301,"score_spread":0.22723869515139167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3216864938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63162893,0.03943251,0.000032614953,0.2642822,0.004120155,0.000320383,0.00027747927,0.000014545602,0.059891175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9024769,0.006760908,0.000087063316,0.0052034864,0.0016165479,0.000013315476,0.000011604973,0.000039680952,0.083790466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954407,0.0015338942,0.00087525934,0.0003933801,0.00040122212,0.0013554966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99566257,0.0015522719,0.00049126544,0.00038533667,0.00038833718,0.0015202481],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004502935,0.00036970287,0.0010718273,0.00012693761,0.0011677552,0.00039424832,0.000699623,0.0003035706,0.00028974563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010904759,0.00033586315,0.00034271798,0.000636753,0.0030052634,0.00037787558,0.000114918636,0.00085616304,0.00002700581],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005757019,0.00004457747,0.0009858349,0.00015782303,0.00052498595,0.0007903322,0.43998516,0.000014727009,0.000006484414,0.54631513,0.0026833892,0.008433982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017235858,0.0002028508,0.0016723039,0.0002992737,0.00018165387,0.00045501607,0.27282682,0.000029159404,0.000020545729,0.13735414,0.5848067,0.00042798163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03442128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.566252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5821233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011239294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037423118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217687857","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.33.2.02","title":"La juge Abella : la première réfugiée à devenir juge au Canada et ses contributions au droit de l’immigration et des réfugiés","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Healthcare Systems and Practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Immigration; Humanities; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03563854373017719,"score_gpt":0.3502790235215406,"score_spread":0.31464047979136345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3217687857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7270018,0.010879821,0.00030598824,0.22579339,0.002144781,0.0005435562,0.0013635926,0.000011946791,0.031955123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9763354,0.0020789262,0.00017690985,0.007386785,0.0010133936,0.000048636997,0.000048657395,0.00006147437,0.012849809],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.985107,0.011266225,0.001304273,0.00033171335,0.00030873905,0.0016820156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987753,0.007333292,0.0010526347,0.0003995803,0.00092348404,0.0025380189],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013479093,0.00038097505,0.0009510509,0.00016060224,0.0017308015,0.00027559872,0.00035827523,0.00062799954,0.00037213825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036127137,0.000348865,0.00018580545,0.00043838023,0.0005724981,0.00069388055,0.000068727146,0.0026942072,0.000014028932],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001339108,0.0000560285,0.0112808505,0.0014248722,0.0003792729,0.0016880579,0.15778245,0.000087860004,0.000016855265,0.81572986,0.0077491216,0.0036708463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024522461,0.00014463518,0.0099214185,0.0027794894,0.00018256412,0.003798714,0.063748844,0.000075470576,0.000022027341,0.041522797,0.87496394,0.00038787237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9376005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8672148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076636164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.079219975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230729731","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.28.2.285","title":"Gendering Disposability","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Colonialism; Power (physics); Sexual violence; Criminology; Gender studies; Sociology; White (mutation); History; Law; Ethnology; Political science","score_opus":0.02927460195298885,"score_gpt":0.2721964668887151,"score_spread":0.2429218649357263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230729731","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9758555,0.00034903942,0.00030576426,0.013101195,0.00030787822,0.000049551072,0.000005299369,0.0000041142853,0.010021651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974859,0.00023114427,0.000018800893,0.000475104,0.00027820692,0.0000029407877,1.03659126e-7,0.000004905893,0.001502944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913746,0.00016721076,0.00019562851,0.00008309431,0.00009697333,0.00031961195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989088,0.00026646644,0.00010924968,0.00011403886,0.00009668503,0.0005047383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017042652,0.00006154933,0.00018356413,0.00007864529,0.0005293762,0.000108962675,0.00020129916,0.000036215584,0.00025968708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030611694,0.00003730566,0.000102183294,0.00014678162,0.00054717896,0.00019647698,0.000010578343,0.00010525577,0.000006877909],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000084210835,0.000017818877,0.010272225,0.000022746766,0.00015642928,0.000063479805,0.18401903,0.000010868899,0.000024574063,0.72551715,0.00023744565,0.079574026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019138982,0.00015923123,0.0063180225,0.00019309646,0.00033465386,0.00020098752,0.55917317,0.000028306787,0.000022891538,0.19791424,0.23335586,0.00038562441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05105964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5446769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5276029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042152335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043277268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95525944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230968483","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.28.2.429","title":"L'enquête nationale sur les meurtres et disparitions de femmes et de filles autochtones","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.03349201909926656,"score_gpt":0.25909639674029206,"score_spread":0.2256043776410255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230968483","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44650707,0.029924912,0.00013928968,0.48469436,0.0011999058,0.00022926398,0.000910042,0.000014442829,0.0363807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85546935,0.007807917,0.00010069432,0.0054603806,0.000565088,0.000021996819,0.0000046158266,0.000028361806,0.13054162],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976179,0.0008093679,0.00040283313,0.00018039181,0.00021578105,0.00077373936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970868,0.0009752905,0.0003090492,0.00015840544,0.00021474808,0.0012556992],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027267218,0.00017520296,0.00038317524,0.0004090459,0.0012438642,0.0006398674,0.00043105113,0.00017387935,0.001338919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007680297,0.0001581154,0.00022329275,0.00024169547,0.0026046897,0.00065502484,0.000025799449,0.0003604875,0.000023584978],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025770316,0.000026696984,0.0017582426,0.000050519448,0.00014043796,0.0001186404,0.05026077,0.00002244316,0.000010200996,0.9176922,0.027382378,0.0025117183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092211383,0.000051954095,0.010916354,0.00045898536,0.00007135464,0.00025285935,0.004467989,0.000012814954,0.0000030429055,0.14563687,0.8369886,0.00021705194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6944719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99405575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80960625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030596412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006815559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236586461","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.28.2.408","title":"The National Inquiry on Murders and Disappearances of Indigenous Women and Girls","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Mandate; Lesbian; Transgender; Theme (computing); Political science; Gender studies; Queer; Transsexual; Alliance; Human rights; Criminology; Face (sociological concept); Sociology; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.0247909159580407,"score_gpt":0.28388664451512985,"score_spread":0.2590957285570892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236586461","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97882223,0.001217437,0.0000019582299,0.007636585,0.00035359288,0.00018769622,0.000013523335,0.0000020610612,0.011764922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903754,0.005976318,0.0000069720486,0.00039132728,0.00038596283,0.0000030595781,2.4000985e-7,0.0000064558762,0.0028542916],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878323,0.00024489066,0.0002499738,0.00009515473,0.00018240706,0.0004443526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858266,0.000521492,0.00023130383,0.00006694997,0.00013854423,0.00045905635],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028537232,0.00008063923,0.00019253831,0.000090478155,0.002709373,0.00009752328,0.00018678902,0.00005861391,0.000021362945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004621124,0.000040544837,0.000027173659,0.000092649796,0.0016512255,0.00016458826,0.0000016457496,0.000118491575,0.0000013872968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045497658,0.0000074979407,0.0011418628,0.000014323061,0.000033456192,0.000001950725,0.6082726,5.4230776e-7,6.977803e-7,0.38892102,0.00004462631,0.0015159304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017773582,0.0003724019,0.015650162,0.00018512977,0.000013815241,0.00007317435,0.07864024,0.0000010629972,0.000011915638,0.37004703,0.5330208,0.00020691825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028728101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.652011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6232829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039458575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00503286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241680288","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.26.2.09","title":"Book Reviews / Chroniques bibliographiques","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Persecution; Queen (butterfly); Criminology; Conciliation; Law; Criminal justice; Sociology; Art history; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.019441866659206213,"score_gpt":0.24969677365111548,"score_spread":0.23025490699190926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241680288","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06619952,0.28703874,0.0001423002,0.09894241,0.0020838552,0.00080653076,0.000038089376,0.00004252159,0.54470605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7112118,0.15003419,0.00015614367,0.061538342,0.0028210403,0.00003907908,0.0000030456613,0.000050520615,0.07414586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985408,0.00049875496,0.00031349465,0.0001017573,0.0001169408,0.0004282456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99842364,0.00012977072,0.00024217927,0.0001515098,0.00009745091,0.00095546024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003715889,0.000090072645,0.00035138146,0.0012804458,0.0009049789,0.00064014195,0.0003506854,0.00007363565,0.00082493003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026424276,0.00008271435,0.00015944707,0.0005428164,0.0015906349,0.00039169143,0.0000095494115,0.00025145605,0.000018177125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015039857,0.000005023058,0.00022422953,0.000036485046,0.000036215202,0.000023112176,0.044535037,5.4667936e-7,0.0000012023725,0.70977515,0.24014296,0.0052050315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003208938,0.000051217194,0.00024107019,0.00009376787,0.000018182689,0.000027175407,0.00073451275,0.0000013160346,7.20712e-7,0.04313729,0.9552722,0.00010163849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.51695865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9770353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71512926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000831183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010243551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9032405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256340648","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.27.1.130a","title":"Book Reviews / Chroniques bibliographiques","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kinship; Sociology; Sexual assault; Political science; Law; Criminology; Medicine; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.04119826754527508,"score_gpt":0.27204608791252455,"score_spread":0.23084782036724946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256340648","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053059906,0.4772795,0.00003648468,0.07928859,0.001920595,0.0006719831,0.000041447598,0.000031663058,0.38766983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58896303,0.20337124,0.00023386304,0.0674985,0.003649982,0.00005908169,0.0000051699644,0.00007122633,0.13614789],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998624,0.0004057567,0.00031045478,0.00009577105,0.00014387243,0.00042009793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99786973,0.00007245744,0.00023122568,0.00013967395,0.00015866554,0.0015282383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037710497,0.0000884057,0.0003383949,0.0013071402,0.0006108619,0.0006511107,0.00034533977,0.00007338384,0.00047893354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027684556,0.00008105005,0.00013669094,0.00063593744,0.0015821584,0.0004940669,0.000010985176,0.00024742662,0.000020454834],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024567922,0.0000058714154,0.0002528464,0.00002273888,0.000039651557,0.00007834223,0.09162326,7.055814e-7,4.593285e-7,0.37364173,0.53219867,0.0021111905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042980377,0.000056551784,0.00010095364,0.00007722939,0.000018123725,0.000045219756,0.002618139,6.0558546e-7,5.158287e-7,0.041905485,0.95464766,0.000099706056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.61799115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97910225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53590316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014516118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026474034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6278676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283311748","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.34.1.06","title":"Power, Gender, and Race in the Legal Profession","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Caucus; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Race (biology); Power (physics); Event (particle physics); Law; Political science; History; Gender studies; Sociology; Medicine; Politics","score_opus":0.04146646887058816,"score_gpt":0.32968739872032826,"score_spread":0.2882209298497401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283311748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6653923,0.00076803414,0.0000031192237,0.25394842,0.00056552066,0.00015610688,0.000006123062,0.0000020217135,0.07915835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98817813,0.00006931927,0.000014781123,0.008728816,0.000106774074,0.0000147473465,7.98938e-7,0.0000041817016,0.002882476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986383,0.00074202934,0.00018458643,0.0000635053,0.00014682,0.00022475705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916553,0.0003574511,0.00016105942,0.00008234487,0.000056234094,0.00017736954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047695776,0.000048781687,0.00010719367,0.000100119,0.0011070084,0.00025007248,0.00024378493,0.000024080986,0.0003650934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033732527,0.00003371758,0.000022931034,0.0003262799,0.00024763757,0.00037796618,0.000017383702,0.00061754405,0.0000012044684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020427213,0.000010917026,0.0008175702,0.000002599395,0.000007932401,0.000018854009,0.26044953,0.0000032879466,0.0000010447659,0.73598164,0.002369621,0.00031659406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045169468,0.000033136235,0.0027027333,0.000006730673,0.0000048855936,0.00012114191,0.24453676,0.0000039243228,2.899657e-7,0.04436214,0.70772874,0.000047794663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021126918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053363703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70535916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024653258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016181899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9853915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283314595","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.34.1.184","title":"Corrigendum","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Slavic languages; Indigenous; The Renaissance; Sociology; Politics; Classics; Media studies; Anthropology; Social science; Humanities; Library science; History; Political science; Art history; Art; Law","score_opus":0.02516872855365308,"score_gpt":0.23286463198572266,"score_spread":0.2076959034320696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283314595","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012430297,0.019273214,0.0000019458785,0.024875224,0.07351026,0.00027775273,0.0003303252,0.000011687591,0.88047653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012271122,0.003551708,0.0000052422683,0.004210978,0.003417735,0.000015520101,0.000023294273,0.00004215436,0.97646224],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977945,0.00047971137,0.00042163514,0.00018842964,0.00035011797,0.00076559314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99743265,0.00010639817,0.000523447,0.00025195515,0.00013273863,0.0015527937],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027586706,0.00017628242,0.0006010887,0.0007632853,0.0026274954,0.00094128866,0.00089444447,0.00025423281,0.0070229955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030471367,0.00019065589,0.00026147862,0.00030831905,0.002029933,0.0002090457,0.000038037873,0.0016658077,0.000026294498],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014437757,0.0000036160957,0.000008897246,0.000025660067,0.00007406172,0.00029642868,0.055368308,8.330839e-7,2.3448136e-8,0.27299196,0.6705771,0.0006386867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044212112,0.000050964416,0.00005388478,0.00007266518,0.000059121117,0.000120861085,0.01028506,0.0000010573017,1.1506753e-8,0.031104382,0.9575983,0.0002115566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8388287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9958396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28702122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006698774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01533871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99867094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283317485","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.34.1.04","title":"What Do You Call an Indigenous Woman with a PhD in Law? Resisting the Subjugation of Indigenous Expertise in Legal Spheres","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Indigenization; Colonialism; Legal education; Racism; Decolonization; Sociology; Law; Traditional knowledge; Political science; Anthropology; Ecology","score_opus":0.03228845169723625,"score_gpt":0.3020444394008083,"score_spread":0.269755987703572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283317485","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97555304,0.0010841627,0.0000024180695,0.01864659,0.0002358527,0.00026088904,0.000007340105,0.0000027017265,0.004207017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99707484,0.00006984546,0.000026606338,0.0021064328,0.00010527464,0.000032909644,0.00000280613,0.0000101822025,0.000571103],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982554,0.00072284293,0.00034539454,0.0001067864,0.00021871856,0.00035090488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892026,0.00023530057,0.0003763916,0.00014547992,0.00011505732,0.00020753333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003145978,0.00008144209,0.00019571833,0.00017414946,0.0009958608,0.0004501537,0.00035509028,0.000037983642,0.00013972442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019010395,0.000060605238,0.000027490376,0.00063054805,0.0004610868,0.001102036,0.000015162156,0.00057265244,4.5065767e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012955708,0.000049160106,0.008671077,0.00000838995,0.000020956839,0.00006494,0.80714643,0.00019473795,0.000006009069,0.18113738,0.00005148143,0.0025198578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015297537,0.00031660293,0.008316492,0.0001250895,0.000018389761,0.00017885736,0.9079819,0.000021278453,0.000012411133,0.018518822,0.06278103,0.00019938078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34530038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91060036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008320106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027626057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7659457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283319944","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.34.1.02","title":"Surrogacy in Canada: Lawyers’ Experiences and Practices","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Narrative; Power (physics); Wish; Political science; Law; Sociology; Public relations; Social science","score_opus":0.03846638008097244,"score_gpt":0.2834843855028589,"score_spread":0.24501800542188648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283319944","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.946006,0.004735727,2.6718257e-7,0.04689212,0.000222568,0.00015786472,0.0000062963704,0.0000028897866,0.0019762784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971441,0.00024204662,0.00002799828,0.0022600733,0.00006241169,0.000029886922,7.6242617e-7,0.0000066865823,0.00022604289],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905926,0.00011298532,0.00024776193,0.00013153575,0.00012240482,0.00032605595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897367,0.00017236684,0.0003013939,0.00014051389,0.000044816217,0.00036725285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011983569,0.00007815919,0.00030053308,0.00013382375,0.00021355701,0.00002879195,0.00012946494,0.00002045969,0.00007737695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005219668,0.00005788676,0.000021044234,0.0001731071,0.00025406654,0.00012297876,0.00003222197,0.00044283434,1.7055622e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001967324,0.00008357745,0.47702548,0.00036109056,0.00029441738,0.005769943,0.2363808,0.000044104567,0.000043817272,0.2561558,0.004262514,0.017611142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006398442,0.0010863636,0.09409745,0.00013780198,0.000055022934,0.009436357,0.5916897,0.00005033239,0.00008772776,0.030592328,0.2660539,0.00031461066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8310293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95299464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38292804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008453631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034341558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6092045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283325100","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.34.1.01","title":"Comprendre l’inconduite sexuelle policière : une perspective canadienne","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Portrait; Ethnology; Sociology; Art; Art history","score_opus":0.021751862491320273,"score_gpt":0.2609736175742867,"score_spread":0.23922175508296645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283325100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8457778,0.014723798,0.000018323866,0.10632466,0.0022037209,0.0001521086,0.00015672493,0.000005269344,0.030637609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9618161,0.0005628976,0.000014928206,0.0030817194,0.00059851754,0.000014188021,0.0000028542677,0.000021223479,0.033887587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974857,0.0006936409,0.00042444796,0.00022188315,0.00021589205,0.0009584223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974805,0.00030196647,0.00037771233,0.00021445238,0.00027566828,0.0013496731],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019159213,0.00020013611,0.0005439647,0.00031937216,0.0025428354,0.00020519078,0.0005464812,0.000073196585,0.0018844411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001064859,0.00019245947,0.00026835798,0.0012072085,0.0012920229,0.00025476937,0.00006782577,0.0008554845,0.000010178031],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005115772,0.000028664606,0.00019201024,0.000022268994,0.00028713144,0.00025721535,0.36463538,0.00076984987,0.0000011654028,0.62832075,0.00097257685,0.004461831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065319653,0.00021193555,0.00012885574,0.00004302395,0.00035445904,0.00060041656,0.6842937,0.0002544536,4.779258e-7,0.03865295,0.27463132,0.00017519905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94870174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.987048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5896678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040025697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023412893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283376689","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.34.1.03","title":"Defamation as a Sword: The Weaponization of Civil Liability against Sexual Assault Survivors in the Post-#MeToo Era","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Intimidation; SWORD; Context (archaeology); Criminology; Lawsuit; Popularity; Mythology; Law; Sexual violence; Liability; Psychology; Political science; Poison control; History; Suicide prevention; Engineering; Medicine; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.017629528914044824,"score_gpt":0.2556159548781488,"score_spread":0.237986425964104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283376689","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94067615,0.00025624863,0.000022244903,0.033047322,0.0003663722,0.0003136859,0.000021718202,0.0000038707954,0.025292397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965104,0.000038484603,0.000011700909,0.0027482633,0.000111322006,0.000020475289,0.0000070807428,0.0000069233224,0.00054534327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969865,0.0017996852,0.0004057394,0.0001038152,0.00042770742,0.00027655571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830747,0.000728197,0.0003840865,0.00019368548,0.00021176595,0.00017481385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009145241,0.00008661573,0.00020719634,0.0001297864,0.00084846927,0.00015460856,0.0005203332,0.00005519394,0.00022801693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001135501,0.000053094507,0.00006527412,0.00048008584,0.00045085856,0.00027035776,0.000030892883,0.00044315608,0.0000018666939],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001780353,0.000062177285,0.007170171,0.000027343267,0.000041087285,0.000018861452,0.40889555,0.0017320204,0.00004577759,0.5768314,0.001412802,0.003584746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003371539,0.00054143625,0.034027725,0.00010804506,0.000054898817,0.00010038365,0.5900381,0.001194703,0.000019172796,0.24084857,0.1293124,0.00038298062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.063324824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5141607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45083588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035881615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087003584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9429126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361981919","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.34.2.05","title":"“Rights Talk,” Abortion, and the Media: Tracking the Evolution of Abortion Discourse in Saskatchewan Newspapers","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Abortion; Charter; Framing (construction); Terminology; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; Media studies; Law; History; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011648151898360054,"score_gpt":0.2494919069334252,"score_spread":0.23784375503506516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361981919","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.946812,0.0040683486,0.000029209246,0.04797683,0.00026375082,0.00039761982,0.000010213278,0.0000020880436,0.00043995518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983227,0.00016098552,0.000007956764,0.00090384757,0.00032147925,0.00003109175,0.0000033788144,0.000008975192,0.00023954395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998613,0.0003551504,0.0004392635,0.00013022505,0.00018601365,0.00027634535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892616,0.00018285564,0.00035140428,0.00018606066,0.00010894651,0.0002445554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030682741,0.00009602033,0.00032960542,0.00012743565,0.00039088549,0.000028507786,0.00011692534,0.000035415786,0.00004943825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015448473,0.00005143294,0.00007053738,0.00023601382,0.0006283628,0.00014198342,0.000012781795,0.00049363787,2.540205e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0068791066,0.00015032651,0.039027207,0.00024759068,0.00039007448,0.00028497615,0.44011673,0.00065543375,0.00045053478,0.47814643,0.00056061783,0.033090975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.018556569,0.00062682386,0.4480376,0.00033350542,0.00032061216,0.0031839588,0.31260836,0.00044707715,0.000049311977,0.20438288,0.011188404,0.00026490152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023956431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1513861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40901038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054655893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072169513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9825431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361983182","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.34.2.08","title":"<i>Animals as Legal Beings: Contesting Anthropocentric Legal Orders</i>, by Maneesha Deckha","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Anthropological Studies and Insights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Anthropocentrism; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.019556821616703714,"score_gpt":0.2700452350625332,"score_spread":0.2504884134458295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361983182","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79087937,0.008604725,0.000027921025,0.06640473,0.00081390154,0.00027649605,0.000041190222,0.000017379985,0.13293426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99025375,0.00055589835,0.000020773596,0.0064667906,0.00028149268,0.000010214619,0.000001643443,0.000013971151,0.0023954818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799204,0.0003952428,0.00037970734,0.0001790262,0.0002848165,0.0007691523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984515,0.00033345638,0.00031143785,0.000094831084,0.000116583076,0.0006922214],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017051301,0.00015168413,0.00042454049,0.00007597246,0.003669294,0.0002862627,0.00045705863,0.000052805422,0.0019409858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004300437,0.00011548044,0.000120581484,0.00032581348,0.0017644303,0.00023584903,0.000078186335,0.0004931133,0.00000632322],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009155023,0.000028101918,0.0009065808,0.000008263908,0.000104502855,0.0005980419,0.023179753,0.000009316843,0.0000061260266,0.9588889,0.014857369,0.0013215023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011131377,0.00043275024,0.00008542093,0.000022587908,0.000027712378,0.0003521954,0.11145552,0.000013457172,0.000006264061,0.025612438,0.86068946,0.000189044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1596396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07912808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9332765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006780244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062565284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361984363","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.34.2.02","title":"“Add Women and Stir”: The Potential and Limits of GBA+ in Canadian Impact Assessment Law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Framing (construction); Impact assessment; Disparate impact; Political science; Injustice; Environmental impact assessment; Intersectionality; Genetic discrimination; Law; Sociology; Engineering; Civil rights; Medicine","score_opus":0.01601715296187049,"score_gpt":0.27895291013984325,"score_spread":0.26293575717797274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361984363","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9672717,0.00079413695,3.4917707e-7,0.011210971,0.00012521308,0.0001740398,0.00010604346,0.0000012464925,0.02031634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968369,0.00022709252,0.000007813793,0.0020195006,0.00010934729,0.000012765307,0.0000017357183,0.000010215672,0.0007746137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984189,0.00043072173,0.00024938598,0.000108738335,0.00017067367,0.00062155986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853367,0.00014543184,0.0001557263,0.00011108319,0.000015860902,0.0010382278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024976854,0.00010747674,0.00026886555,0.00011742952,0.0008521243,0.00012503486,0.00026786097,0.000044139164,0.00035506568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003186238,0.00007854761,0.00004933043,0.00014376773,0.0008809001,0.0001513529,0.000038700317,0.0003557329,4.275827e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007114889,0.00002060701,0.022526376,0.000017721806,0.000114315706,0.00013903766,0.1331826,0.00015250276,0.000019447625,0.841707,0.00031116192,0.0017381018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0055582216,0.0012346816,0.22027685,0.00009854376,0.00008497531,0.00068210677,0.11975697,0.00013235034,0.000009282122,0.24579972,0.40571147,0.0006548335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82657826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9616615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5959073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013904218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012129493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6553937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361986374","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.34.2.03","title":"Les francophones éffacé·e·s : l’intersectionnalité et la mise en œuvre des droits linguistiques législatifs en Ontario et au Canada","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; French; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.013676017808607404,"score_gpt":0.2318854212184132,"score_spread":0.2182094034098058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361986374","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8595031,0.0049683787,0.000008017699,0.022439284,0.004854819,0.0001884943,0.00029464116,0.0000078242165,0.10773545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9148524,0.00045763818,0.000040941533,0.0026586782,0.00073298265,0.000017717619,0.0000070407177,0.00003203051,0.08120057],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958164,0.0022921795,0.00053758937,0.00024676966,0.00034832032,0.00075875496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99725056,0.0007900364,0.00039602543,0.00019666262,0.0001709409,0.0011957964],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004490069,0.00023863532,0.00052479125,0.0003650644,0.0028492655,0.0005377812,0.0006004603,0.00014327173,0.0030225564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038603673,0.0002786237,0.00021345672,0.0003456161,0.0016427526,0.00030776707,0.00006123815,0.0012813563,0.0000050747344],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071122966,0.00002451622,0.0032911634,0.00007705702,0.00020293165,0.00066746003,0.6324023,0.00021694621,0.0000012846639,0.35500348,0.0047156527,0.0033260782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078569644,0.000119650336,0.00760061,0.00019761558,0.00006991119,0.0005367333,0.053392462,0.000010084428,5.840378e-7,0.03339395,0.9036069,0.00028578695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89889127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024893831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031037644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361986848","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.34.2.06","title":"The Role of Motive in Sexual Assault Trials","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Scrutiny; Sexual assault; Psychology; Social psychology; Criminology; Deception; Law; Political science; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.04579871980734939,"score_gpt":0.30970335697991785,"score_spread":0.26390463717256846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361986848","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9458053,0.004089138,0.000007371659,0.01983964,0.00058900804,0.00028918864,0.00004755141,0.0000037226162,0.02932904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99738055,0.00014342871,0.00000734794,0.00045164526,0.00015815334,0.000016290294,7.10481e-7,0.0000056467443,0.0018362177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779373,0.0011813558,0.00042434467,0.00007292089,0.00023064582,0.00029697167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980099,0.0012135945,0.0003730897,0.00007829896,0.00013359991,0.00019147896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009470348,0.00006750287,0.00035901656,0.00009390956,0.0009841067,0.0000758461,0.0003008854,0.00003212147,0.00010788117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010400163,0.000044104774,0.000057608617,0.00028390804,0.00047875175,0.00009687991,0.000032189168,0.0002788603,6.605782e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020328595,0.000021793996,0.010274096,0.000004514916,0.00018148797,0.000017373997,0.38181475,0.00032268197,0.0000066579482,0.59812266,0.00084688276,0.00818382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014956357,0.0001495828,0.0019477252,0.000010680807,0.000023208815,0.0000138562355,0.6209959,0.000046803347,0.000006527119,0.11208649,0.26313147,0.00009210293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032323997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24184619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48603618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031302628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006344684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97411984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361989170","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.34.2.07","title":"Trans Rights, Trans Justice: A Conversation About Key Trans Legal Issues in Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Economic Justice; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Social justice; Backlash; Sociology; Law and economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.013871793585896868,"score_gpt":0.24039176472040483,"score_spread":0.22651997113450795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361989170","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79931134,0.0039918125,0.00003659066,0.16823314,0.0012714721,0.00039246032,0.00022688996,0.000008796301,0.026527477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99337524,0.0004874785,0.000014454533,0.0030769503,0.00022777602,0.000013744562,0.0000046680716,0.000009186716,0.0027905009],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830395,0.0004463359,0.0003169741,0.00012662639,0.00029702985,0.0005090724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991671,0.00012662252,0.000124618,0.00008484804,0.000061590574,0.0004352295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015173568,0.000116981966,0.00030627893,0.000027356096,0.0011575314,0.00011773985,0.0003878359,0.00006205496,0.0008165178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023628847,0.000097619086,0.0001108754,0.0002708375,0.00041626327,0.00025388203,0.0000044568565,0.0005651137,3.3745383e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000616808,0.000011404177,0.0002308339,0.000027573913,0.00006383899,0.0001658573,0.5640423,0.00028752236,0.000005565503,0.43207744,0.002777607,0.00024836883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015764282,0.0000511382,0.0003637023,0.00003341792,0.00006488644,0.000056460907,0.19815975,0.000038047318,0.0000043687523,0.02814278,0.7713523,0.00015669694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95911753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99890035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7685747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018757666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036279054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89402974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361994661","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.34.2.01","title":"La non-reconnaissance des unions coutumières et religieuses dans le nouveau droit de la famille ivoirien : un non-respect du droit à l’égalité des femmes","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05612815699136493,"score_gpt":0.3175383290515012,"score_spread":0.2614101720601363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361994661","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9290868,0.0048369896,0.00016901146,0.029226366,0.0007638982,0.00036706973,0.00034676952,0.000022871793,0.03518024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9744105,0.0021003918,0.00023570294,0.0051465197,0.0004954849,0.00005388362,0.000012756966,0.000072774375,0.017472023],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944379,0.002487104,0.0008363998,0.00040399696,0.00040941653,0.0014251843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958219,0.0013749816,0.00061248994,0.00038550867,0.00034788888,0.0014572527],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00594036,0.000425065,0.0007535608,0.000244206,0.0031904012,0.0006738291,0.0010961418,0.00022542996,0.00025837615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00077791547,0.00041105814,0.0003409843,0.00054872414,0.007408337,0.00073435245,0.00013708929,0.0010600041,0.0000091616985],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005926985,0.000089496454,0.014781044,0.00007755158,0.0002935035,0.0002903558,0.4117159,0.0011358984,0.000051390198,0.566183,0.004817377,0.0005052401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00350053,0.0003207066,0.0731885,0.0004071299,0.00022872756,0.0019120057,0.4229137,0.0003534693,0.00016312524,0.21005583,0.28606936,0.0008869411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2740771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47007668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35612714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052992655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066804346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386711153","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.2023.06.12","title":"Grounds-Based Distinctions: Contested Starting Points in Equality Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Doctrine; Law; Charter; Legislature; Political science; Meaning (existential); Common law; Sociology; Law and economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.06390549496755529,"score_gpt":0.3022023849584156,"score_spread":0.23829688999086032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386711153","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8962223,0.00047568165,0.00004218932,0.045955777,0.0004605219,0.0001731189,0.000032407515,0.000017625416,0.056620367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968423,0.000034998662,0.0000117192485,0.0026453726,0.00017875966,0.000009536735,0.000001849078,0.0000043321015,0.00027111705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878407,0.00028367696,0.00030154272,0.00008888259,0.00014290333,0.00039892888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888563,0.0004909654,0.00014496059,0.00006013711,0.00010775643,0.00031052064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003069045,0.00007387026,0.0002338469,0.00008985766,0.0008829504,0.00011734186,0.00015649125,0.00003895131,0.000044541615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056492764,0.000059924525,0.00006129859,0.00036726543,0.0011714852,0.00015898483,0.000014517693,0.00018874029,0.000009357655],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000363911,0.000005582682,0.0056930766,0.0000060515026,0.000024648318,0.000048558093,0.014722766,0.000020039388,8.857995e-7,0.97903246,0.00009796125,0.0003115645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001667851,0.000056392826,0.01237727,0.00016725062,0.000017718216,0.00000903947,0.03034772,0.000039079026,0.000002250885,0.8942478,0.06090837,0.00015928436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19954805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.76718616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5676381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042373748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007020689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8057822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387169431","doi":"10.3138/cjwl-2023-07-12","title":"Prison Activism on Trial: Canadian Feminists Mobilize against the Carceral State during the 1970s","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; State (computer science); Context (archaeology); Gender studies; Sociology; Criminology; Race (biology); Prison reform; Political science; History","score_opus":0.023144856269672217,"score_gpt":0.2510285538708227,"score_spread":0.22788369760115046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387169431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9191604,0.00035166935,1.9679382e-7,0.042080756,0.001103864,0.00046143826,0.00007348019,0.000012458504,0.036755696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96755666,0.0005418412,7.7952933e-7,0.0027286324,0.00057086285,0.00002837359,0.0000020030234,0.000023961951,0.02854688],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977952,0.0005071525,0.00033469067,0.00017170458,0.00027801355,0.00091323594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99767447,0.00041483412,0.00023538701,0.00029797593,0.000080654645,0.0012966899],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032699364,0.00014622093,0.00030631074,0.00047158735,0.0035040386,0.00092638424,0.0007210764,0.000086958484,0.00012640408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032430005,0.00010464864,0.00016854837,0.0005071851,0.0015092884,0.00019224084,0.00002108773,0.0006287169,0.000036194742],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015889345,0.000022601465,0.00058119866,0.000056582343,0.0003524916,0.0010091715,0.7334692,0.00035548728,0.000010521931,0.2216879,0.03014005,0.010725886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0044017243,0.00009822434,0.0046909414,0.00007033617,0.000025487887,0.000035909823,0.020322734,0.000014205604,0.0000020024052,0.011263328,0.95887214,0.00020293958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9389766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9287321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003728872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005242197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99779326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390048205","doi":"10.3138/cjwl_2023_grant3","title":"A Conversation on Feminism, Ableism, and Medical Assistance in Dying","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Silence; Conversation; Sociology; Feminism; Autonomy; Solidarity; Gender studies; Ableism; Law; Political science; Politics; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.07982713056455543,"score_gpt":0.3465495718912263,"score_spread":0.2667224413266709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390048205","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9775442,0.0013266238,0.000011134509,0.016154354,0.00013782026,0.00008561351,0.0000066261746,0.000003952329,0.004729705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99635535,0.001043634,0.000031180607,0.002017061,0.00009393678,0.0000037268308,0.0000029417758,0.000009068894,0.0004431068],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991849,0.00006996768,0.0002690371,0.00008860065,0.00015358983,0.00023389418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989315,0.00037481362,0.0001240284,0.00008275427,0.000054208635,0.00043268915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012516829,0.00007908262,0.00034296844,0.00018940734,0.000044578854,0.000022268552,0.000074183285,0.00006660517,0.00004295142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003896265,0.000059045422,0.000037341724,0.00018869061,0.00022577711,0.00005941191,0.000009479595,0.00025691267,0.0000028439765],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018563753,0.00006851149,0.3163439,0.00088762713,0.00057649304,0.0049676076,0.34698474,0.00006106044,0.00013810031,0.30556262,0.0032055574,0.019347383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.061370157,0.0034023423,0.3021434,0.02764924,0.00039978593,0.002521591,0.17442496,0.0065052067,0.0010008478,0.13811412,0.28117177,0.001296614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013104797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00646984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2779662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018542058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035624663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36103228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390062336","doi":"10.3138/cjwl_2023_09_22","title":"Police Sexual Violence and Corporate Crime","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Corporate crime; Criminology; Sexual assault; Corporate security; Organizational culture; Sexual violence; Scholarship; Business; Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Corporate social responsibility; Law; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics","score_opus":0.06447961502606565,"score_gpt":0.30412564093864436,"score_spread":0.23964602591257872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390062336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9808857,0.0006320448,0.000011314195,0.00957779,0.00031757166,0.00008928435,0.0000142019235,0.000013484592,0.00845864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99458736,0.0007920258,0.000014682427,0.0014823669,0.0002828104,0.0000037599773,9.780339e-7,0.000007568346,0.0028284467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910355,0.00015438502,0.00018382585,0.000092087714,0.000113681686,0.00035244657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894005,0.0002306156,0.0001746463,0.000066260276,0.00012238478,0.00046604342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014800115,0.00007756208,0.00020836276,0.000110724075,0.0006402425,0.00015164242,0.00015752029,0.000044059474,0.000035010842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013346893,0.000059885493,0.000021838063,0.00031572703,0.0006696617,0.00016779263,0.000021707747,0.00013697709,0.000010742558],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006987109,0.000008423883,0.019337185,0.00003002665,0.00014419685,0.00006251392,0.44537914,0.00003773206,0.000008976842,0.5230938,0.0044513326,0.0073768166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034011248,0.00033111832,0.042094108,0.00027348087,0.00008618937,0.00019361342,0.52089316,0.00022753491,0.000010650781,0.2977912,0.13413326,0.0005645547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0598086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18167514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22530258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000097747106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003207572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9464522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396571388","doi":"10.3138/cjwl_35_02_01","title":"Aftermath of a Storm: Women and Reparations for Residential School Abuses","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Storm; Political science; History; Sociology; Law; Geography; Meteorology","score_opus":0.0401771665093883,"score_gpt":0.35824081109403794,"score_spread":0.31806364458464964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396571388","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99095637,0.0037846162,0.000053453652,0.0029422727,0.000517579,0.00033153847,0.00009853728,0.000007593782,0.00130804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963308,0.00041377643,0.000043784876,0.0003458313,0.0004683873,0.00008750595,0.0000022383406,0.00001902926,0.0022886642],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987201,0.00020396309,0.0004757676,0.000107087675,0.0000813241,0.00041171955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985491,0.00044206064,0.00018972685,0.00011930786,0.00014737176,0.0005524284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015348908,0.00009869213,0.00046189973,0.00015370054,0.0004789182,0.000089522604,0.00013166734,0.000094567535,0.0001557382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020330476,0.00007371982,0.000069218695,0.000114014685,0.00020951102,0.00022856596,0.000019633511,0.0003229844,0.0000042323218],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025368106,0.000010895408,0.005785045,0.00088757725,0.00025302617,0.00006339105,0.60817343,0.000003834798,0.000029198725,0.38233012,0.0013525017,0.0008573082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0048296875,0.00052519183,0.016828412,0.0020032087,0.000156451,0.0000474935,0.38579908,0.00014796792,0.000020900254,0.4105805,0.17864373,0.00041739023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005313068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1303233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22237433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003379369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011940893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.885546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400521338","doi":"10.3138/cjwl_2024_03_08","title":"Learning, Living, and Teaching Anishinaabe Law: A Tribute to Jean Borrows","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribute; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.01344486030079948,"score_gpt":0.2740879883477797,"score_spread":0.2606431280469802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400521338","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85179317,0.003201669,0.000028535153,0.028440798,0.0009970567,0.00027987166,0.000011580747,0.000020223733,0.115227126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9576142,0.0016597813,0.000062083636,0.00089892815,0.0008601941,0.0000020399789,0.0000010239665,0.00001655139,0.038885202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998312,0.00053385214,0.00026527254,0.00015016634,0.00013588497,0.00060285593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981408,0.0005011545,0.00010311894,0.00009076449,0.000076244534,0.0010878795],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005122065,0.00010948881,0.00024569465,0.00009820788,0.0039912905,0.000652881,0.00022674601,0.000081532155,0.000090841924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010155478,0.000080302,0.000057951485,0.00011160971,0.00034384092,0.00031761848,0.0000028843392,0.00057572185,0.0000099271065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049027503,0.0000040068353,0.000121604084,0.00002300503,0.000019115978,0.000024725576,0.4288009,0.0000027609183,1.9577756e-7,0.57030094,0.000347917,0.00034990275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015908018,0.0001470021,0.00016313567,0.00021760432,0.000018921202,0.00008101251,0.024387714,0.000015269847,9.1319305e-7,0.04056999,0.93412596,0.00011337047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3884041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96909165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93377805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051343784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055765295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402182563","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.00-00-1-3-x","title":"Le stéréotype de la « bonne grand-mère » comme facteur de clémence des tribunaux : analyse des biais de genre à l’épreuve de la détermination de la peine chez les femmes aînées","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06396846998687526,"score_gpt":0.3669065873764772,"score_spread":0.3029381173896019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402182563","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9487504,0.03504356,0.0013076912,0.008509941,0.00024702208,0.00024715267,0.00016139421,0.000035919187,0.0056969584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984436,0.0075194743,0.0006604373,0.001955382,0.00071594864,0.000031864834,0.0000134075535,0.00007727934,0.00459022],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911392,0.0063307146,0.0006544597,0.00026467614,0.0001660787,0.0014448973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936744,0.0041247765,0.00035043302,0.00022224536,0.00023402902,0.0013941097],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010392657,0.000358165,0.000730373,0.00033296345,0.0017276288,0.0006023957,0.0004972117,0.0007777485,0.00014202605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014538077,0.00032917564,0.00028646554,0.0004357314,0.0023949328,0.00044986585,0.00006477379,0.0022323865,0.0000055889072],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016352657,0.00008274236,0.15277821,0.0013006151,0.0005346952,0.001497206,0.73589677,0.00011531122,0.00014293597,0.0912349,0.0017135282,0.01453956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036601422,0.0003532399,0.14497176,0.004506533,0.0008197169,0.002096857,0.33818805,0.0012777713,0.00033326185,0.46036962,0.042671528,0.00075151405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08404176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21119013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3977087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025700128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005691614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409674518","doi":"10.3138/cjwl-05-x","title":"Left Wanting: A Case Comment on <i>R. v Kirkpatrick</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.0309976237075008,"score_gpt":0.294895670142851,"score_spread":0.2638980464353502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409674518","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5688492,0.0011448046,0.000032119966,0.30819196,0.0007855566,0.00020749858,0.000012017952,0.000008369719,0.120768465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977845,0.00015591206,0.000022443139,0.018365595,0.00018162589,0.0000025833674,3.002929e-7,0.000005931855,0.0034205741],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877256,0.00025055604,0.00027829985,0.0001111185,0.00013003036,0.00045742054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985809,0.00048608164,0.00014593816,0.00014204826,0.00009900567,0.00054602517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024727057,0.0001006988,0.00026441095,0.00012702786,0.00087066565,0.0002367966,0.00029818274,0.00005647685,0.00008911469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003075578,0.000077650606,0.00009572585,0.00016929746,0.00050295226,0.00014414957,0.000021054015,0.00029501502,0.0000062781705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000707595,0.000013305842,0.0007714803,0.000026856696,0.000044144803,0.0012220222,0.043441467,0.000009353898,0.0000011191795,0.9408155,0.011402028,0.0021819454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008722543,0.000103594335,0.00012730586,0.00021496337,0.000048439073,0.0006798459,0.024848087,0.000010170765,0.000011290744,0.06515325,0.9078064,0.00012438574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.062260687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23671027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8964044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042479346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076679816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9439838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409674543","doi":"10.3138/cjwl-04-x","title":"The Murky Circumstances of Consent in Canada: A Commentary on <i>R. v Kirkpatrick</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.027221916312663245,"score_gpt":0.29954327072214665,"score_spread":0.2723213544094834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409674543","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34234127,0.0011287924,0.000003747,0.5870178,0.00092655467,0.00015511189,0.000017638555,0.0000011419061,0.06840799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9740582,0.0003490651,0.0000063201524,0.024412418,0.000078032084,0.0000059048853,6.0332684e-7,0.000002638298,0.0010867885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892604,0.00032329813,0.0003255125,0.000057218887,0.00012372977,0.00024422375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976715,0.0016890812,0.0002374538,0.00010344327,0.00012274005,0.00017582178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019826232,0.00005647581,0.00016198457,0.0001012167,0.0004670091,0.000103779086,0.00026551553,0.000023667559,0.000044034452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005817044,0.000039342278,0.000030193096,0.00042807564,0.00040592026,0.00012952404,0.000007362771,0.00032659783,4.4224507e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054535576,0.000012572579,0.0069059157,0.000011231031,0.0000475199,0.0000141681785,0.027535902,0.00001669589,7.440545e-7,0.9259782,0.037709873,0.0017126815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072550285,0.000024996782,0.0030280924,0.00009363152,0.0000134245065,0.0000071706318,0.07365562,0.000005567039,0.000006557651,0.05301884,0.8693585,0.00006210802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9728402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99906206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8729593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011930827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012443061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9931555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409675351","doi":"10.3138/cjwl-02-x","title":"Reasoning from Remedy in <i>R. v Morgentaler</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016044874679068545,"score_gpt":0.2740055504505927,"score_spread":0.25796067577152415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409675351","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7534906,0.004815458,0.000017190805,0.02116924,0.00087593234,0.00015738203,0.000017901531,0.0000071602844,0.2194491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923238,0.000117236275,0.0001206795,0.002317864,0.00022263911,0.0000048222446,8.9910844e-7,0.000007801548,0.004884238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986943,0.00029831566,0.00030605658,0.00011917673,0.00013111954,0.0004510039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890804,0.00028416145,0.00014118178,0.00014900902,0.00006196819,0.0004556311],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019436036,0.00009001476,0.00028992572,0.00013871085,0.00031593975,0.00017805646,0.00043736005,0.0000777844,0.0001397825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005397133,0.00007619307,0.00006416029,0.00034310966,0.000592622,0.00019866618,0.000027344175,0.0003535083,0.000006605928],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000513432,0.000008274083,0.0142481495,0.000007296052,0.00005337112,0.00014814845,0.30617067,0.0000123156315,0.0000045195425,0.677469,0.0008325418,0.0009943513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019316438,0.00003064876,0.003097187,0.00033744922,0.000030775478,0.000010291009,0.042920202,0.000026988428,0.000017402157,0.24950732,0.70190835,0.00018173493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14106317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43714306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7010758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006933021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084565964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86465657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414109541","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.03.x","title":"Treating Male Violence against Women and Girls as Hate in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hate crime; Human factors and ergonomics; Suicide prevention; Criminal offence; Poison control; Social issues","score_opus":0.01262781768549617,"score_gpt":0.2565469117318541,"score_spread":0.24391909404635795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414109541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87376666,0.0009786547,0.0000031787495,0.0017293476,0.00021644187,0.00011536877,0.00001002062,0.0000021917385,0.123178154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937074,0.0008554342,0.000016324217,0.0034698339,0.000058732636,0.000011741044,4.488609e-7,0.000006012385,0.001874028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863166,0.00020113478,0.0003025765,0.00013273799,0.00011781522,0.0006140943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898183,0.00021954229,0.00013033419,0.0001012069,0.000067427216,0.0004996839],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015854896,0.000109721,0.00030525523,0.00012382244,0.00041444134,0.00015223055,0.00027554703,0.000047151316,0.000058850706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017835062,0.0000921969,0.000028657172,0.00023798624,0.00040568033,0.00017563188,0.000023193115,0.00024735587,0.0000017254667],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014174594,0.000014129329,0.13369577,0.00010325644,0.0001042665,0.0006160585,0.13053776,0.00014552704,0.000019680252,0.7061121,0.0004872265,0.028022498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0074501876,0.0002494721,0.17197077,0.0035057215,0.00006025307,0.0002691749,0.33073568,0.0007597151,0.0000732091,0.41708055,0.06670936,0.0011359127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91844076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9769174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28903157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015547998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039580306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70213765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7140288330","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.36.2.04","title":"Mary Jane Mossman, Quiet Rebels: A History of Ontario Women Lawyers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"QUIET; Government (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Narrative; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.01576555779353932,"score_gpt":0.21485970298345614,"score_spread":0.1990941451899168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7140288330","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6078805,0.005438208,0.0000042465736,0.009517134,0.001781799,0.00018768306,0.000026599067,0.0000069439543,0.3751569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65223396,0.00029693954,0.000024542247,0.0030378916,0.00015604733,0.00001007188,0.0000012645523,0.000011189948,0.34422806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853724,0.00020889625,0.00040182233,0.0001357529,0.00017158671,0.000544723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984554,0.0001350588,0.00027787389,0.00019949839,0.00013263727,0.0007995533],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022182632,0.00010877679,0.00042928473,0.00054645183,0.00046971458,0.00015335601,0.00045689644,0.000108776614,0.0010467129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015029099,0.00011686818,0.00013063698,0.00021464731,0.0019338187,0.00025164877,0.00002143298,0.00038600538,0.0000058429205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012812803,0.000017596038,0.0008863007,0.00006722345,0.00017376797,0.00012622953,0.45469418,0.0000071607856,0.000003877562,0.4957048,0.046426874,0.0017638642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008647918,0.000055529807,0.001115385,0.000100056815,0.000030948846,0.000020377773,0.011867212,0.0000010267058,4.407892e-7,0.029767103,0.95606375,0.00011336505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95968455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99908125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9096369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027332883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02128116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7140310375","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.36.2.02","title":"Joanne Martel, Too Few to Matter: Institutional Inertia in the Prisoning of Women in Québec and Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Inertia; Wage; Agency (philosophy)","score_opus":0.010796396411607687,"score_gpt":0.24535554539993762,"score_spread":0.23455914898832994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7140310375","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9680971,0.00056584284,0.00001180885,0.025919082,0.00012311433,0.000086929496,0.000005332277,6.6861486e-7,0.005190157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954436,0.000070541224,0.000009367847,0.0036137768,0.000045408862,0.000011113578,3.5884048e-7,0.0000024689243,0.00080339675],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989889,0.00017439945,0.00028592983,0.00008357039,0.0001133035,0.00035388704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927396,0.00024132359,0.00008861347,0.00008304225,0.000061002425,0.00025208844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018171613,0.000068028145,0.00024453163,0.00023218563,0.00027153926,0.000087034095,0.0002285109,0.00002982704,0.00005654377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023854178,0.000050159946,0.00003037831,0.00044674546,0.00024454802,0.00010525151,0.000016940554,0.00018991214,5.044461e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020695155,0.00004557084,0.1932799,0.000112827045,0.00016203462,0.00019894066,0.6179723,0.0009347017,0.0000085912,0.17089228,0.0028312972,0.013354608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011068123,0.000083103514,0.08787518,0.00032310197,0.00008172439,0.00006923209,0.7873831,0.00007267508,0.000003882203,0.0063047954,0.116510905,0.00018549347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99240464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99980414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16941081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015056285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038908327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.690217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7140336149","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.36.2.01","title":"Treating Male Violence against Women and Girls as Hate in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hate crime; Human factors and ergonomics; Suicide prevention; Criminal offence; Poison control; Social issues","score_opus":0.016063075468619785,"score_gpt":0.2642360604888481,"score_spread":0.24817298502022833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7140336149","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9472863,0.0011502451,0.0000037975674,0.008252691,0.00021085673,0.000098949335,0.000007370077,0.0000022207757,0.042987578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992282,0.000714221,0.00001324956,0.0031437161,0.00006371695,0.000009848531,4.2223073e-7,0.000004477933,0.003768369],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898183,0.0001571685,0.0002483155,0.00010148734,0.00010216633,0.00040901467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913454,0.00025856975,0.00012229079,0.00006377797,0.000078171804,0.00034263916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010706556,0.000086696215,0.00026880164,0.00010770005,0.00046427408,0.00011776084,0.00015988972,0.000034162353,0.000050350773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024636247,0.000070535054,0.000018466664,0.00025961894,0.00027815046,0.00013850695,0.000019232186,0.00015995852,7.043278e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013462985,0.00001539031,0.34513378,0.000073239455,0.0002209516,0.00029090064,0.3463856,0.00028019142,0.0000048739803,0.27267838,0.0010754836,0.033706583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0058487873,0.00015181424,0.06391803,0.00097553286,0.00004215049,0.00007967218,0.6403548,0.00033028208,0.000015626782,0.1499179,0.13774158,0.000623787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88759625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9939232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29396924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001177079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024830436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44048128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}