{"meta":{"query_hash":"ab22e582a956","filters":{"venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit"},"cohort_total":184,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":184,"exported":184,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ab22e582a956","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Canadian+Journal+of+Women+and+the+Law%2FRevue+Femmes+et+Droit"},"results":[{"id":"W1513301480","doi":"","title":"Dignity and the Conditions of Truth: What Equality Needs from Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Humanities; Interpretation (philosophy); Sociology; Ethnology; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.031650207202165416,"score_gpt":0.28310874639364203,"score_spread":0.2514585391914766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1513301480","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14356558,0.012887453,0.011006357,0.16334544,0.00072829943,0.00006983994,0.000107054155,0.00002949064,0.6682606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890492,0.0018474829,0.00059731846,0.0025497342,0.00021093916,0.00003329191,0.000017686765,0.000016886652,0.0056773704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99258786,0.0040638032,0.0002642111,0.0005662683,0.0012159612,0.0013019273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98851264,0.008721146,0.00064189435,0.0007490741,0.0006460669,0.000729222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008133367,0.00037448973,0.0008405425,0.0015454008,0.0098894555,0.017617721,0.0017392824,0.008585031,0.008602988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017165072,0.00042695834,0.0006246682,0.0011512641,0.09217182,0.03349076,0.008886053,0.007045678,0.00067991513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008259805,0.0000061247047,0.0001897986,0.00002479224,0.0000010516759,0.00008640659,0.008792689,0.000037694892,0.000034504785,0.98871136,0.00031820737,0.0017891016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011848779,0.000019369614,0.0006058116,0.00028316613,0.0000045146285,0.00012690003,0.02221357,0.00015883772,0.00013228325,0.9528443,0.023586573,0.000012845375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009458552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008152928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017617721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012801964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008182305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09288514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1537780952","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.21.2.417","title":"<b>Rapports sociaux de sexe/genre et droit: repenser le droit</b><b><i>Dirigé par Louise Langevin</i></b> <i>(Paris: Éditions des archives contemporaines/Agence universitaire de la Francophonie, 2008)</i>","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04299957760662371,"score_gpt":0.30370979714161705,"score_spread":0.26071021953499335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1537780952","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010820108,0.24029431,0.0035700926,0.13724118,0.056847207,0.00015405884,0.005022873,0.0004129786,0.5456372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09958385,0.102938846,0.0032851503,0.015710676,0.015935613,0.0002572611,0.0036048708,0.000960171,0.7577235],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891055,0.00033379227,0.00006160456,0.00013086475,0.00041652576,0.00014667229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982876,0.000690726,0.00014264476,0.00012307703,0.0006062162,0.00014965003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014174397,0.00097503356,0.0005031986,0.0039133327,0.0051251613,0.0062343306,0.0009372124,0.0017675877,0.024167106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032541766,0.00040437144,0.00049912045,0.004647315,0.00365594,0.0029754755,0.0013791735,0.0030769168,0.00439433],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016073858,0.000008201913,0.0005845649,0.00016737609,0.000006369693,0.000047310154,0.0071685095,0.000046721972,0.000111799105,0.030149147,0.9294914,0.032202408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011400919,0.0000023127907,0.001741128,0.00014612556,0.0000016494347,0.000036967722,0.0018660154,0.00001163018,0.000045381264,0.00074750633,0.9953939,0.0000062317085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2772108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40246633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2772108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010427132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006987687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55119455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1572565470","doi":"","title":"Symes v. Canada","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Shadow (psychology); Political science; Work (physics); Constitutional right; Inequality; Law; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.018840764064398614,"score_gpt":0.23528344492949993,"score_spread":0.21644268086510132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1572565470","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011190896,0.003117685,0.0006754328,0.0978704,0.0018385731,0.00014211313,0.0010684708,0.00014172362,0.8839547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13310306,0.0019361642,0.0005837461,0.14084181,0.0002879659,0.000118540374,0.00044549513,0.000104932355,0.7225782],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928807,0.0003566421,0.00011851286,0.00078857533,0.0027289104,0.0031266233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99741995,0.00031829948,0.00006193616,0.00010999212,0.0014834147,0.0006063727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019299218,0.00069296814,0.00055400684,0.0011158219,0.025160424,0.006856371,0.0017737554,0.009737259,0.031217594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006033668,0.00068471144,0.00084811874,0.0011682449,0.0040115826,0.0018294662,0.0031397734,0.011582816,0.0028150722],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005340527,0.000020993755,0.0020497455,0.0000770377,0.000021593552,0.00097155134,0.0013839531,0.00020960817,0.00048191033,0.3910397,0.5876615,0.016029086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032638556,0.000024856068,0.0029257084,0.00015650512,0.000031529074,0.00029305278,0.0015264085,0.00028212057,0.000483702,0.010327073,0.98384213,0.000074202486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9640061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98423785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049657002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.049657002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13910455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36028844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1596745203","doi":"","title":"Poverty: Rights, Social Citizenship, and Legal Activism (review)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Humanities; Social activism; Poverty; Sociology; Ethnology; Political science; Art; Law","score_opus":0.03650307164823102,"score_gpt":0.27295225635577847,"score_spread":0.23644918470754744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1596745203","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001342827,0.9978598,0.000008274934,0.0014104745,0.00010600443,0.0000043846444,0.000013088994,8.880268e-7,0.00046280393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002251614,0.9967489,0.000027420447,0.0005354078,0.00013166472,0.000009994152,0.000017088223,6.4601574e-7,0.000277266],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989348,0.0003879338,0.00013093794,0.00007230936,0.00035858375,0.000115355695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955735,0.0025954964,0.0007343565,0.000052558327,0.0007711654,0.00027278098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021717532,0.00058307365,0.0016565442,0.0043669096,0.0008075513,0.002866732,0.0007594889,0.0015388913,0.0044538863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055427686,0.0003765625,0.0007359013,0.009057699,0.0017390357,0.001921656,0.0010355617,0.0012104264,0.0004406758],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010259162,0.000054143296,0.0027619645,0.0532463,0.00042032212,0.00020626101,0.0006679232,0.00020999784,0.00011274494,0.0037688713,0.1400722,0.79837674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000798332,0.00013000144,0.03355994,0.13453043,0.0008804995,0.00082405756,0.0019393726,0.00010873717,0.00012171983,0.0027096618,0.82506394,0.000051928248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09919682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24687746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09919682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004075331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016359715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19723886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599220707","doi":"","title":"Réflexions concernant le Renvoi relatif à la Loi sur l'assurance-emploi","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Population; Law; Tribunal; Humanities; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy; Demography","score_opus":0.030748161127069164,"score_gpt":0.275211807417966,"score_spread":0.24446364629089687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1599220707","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043978028,0.007166838,0.0025484005,0.6789511,0.003402052,0.000102045546,0.00013545061,0.00007296957,0.26364312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5367024,0.0032023655,0.0012212562,0.28934497,0.0015441247,0.00011953533,0.000035792815,0.000099282355,0.1677302],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9856391,0.0026135296,0.00038008916,0.0015228512,0.0040418417,0.0058026058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917663,0.0044533135,0.00050778204,0.0002559017,0.0018587502,0.0011579765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010973806,0.0006285674,0.00067311036,0.0007609015,0.028962668,0.016301904,0.004706024,0.02459074,0.0056585292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015179529,0.00066451915,0.0008886432,0.0010117587,0.025314834,0.0042925347,0.006045189,0.030151637,0.0006715104],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030591193,0.000033058957,0.0026838556,0.00010169901,0.000017303899,0.0020508587,0.07543296,0.00021713156,0.00043355566,0.7842236,0.12725505,0.0075203436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023669747,0.000035345533,0.0036044589,0.00067791174,0.00005298196,0.0005821053,0.07141309,0.00037854625,0.0008466893,0.030314552,0.8919149,0.00015572576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85162824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9067988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14837176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05261653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.089909285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38176143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1883598107","doi":"","title":"Sexual Assault in Canada: Law, Legal Practice and Women's Activism ed. by Elizabeth A. Sheehy (review)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Criminology; Law; Political science; Sexual violence; Sociology; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Poison control; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.02753803651864543,"score_gpt":0.28854976556876105,"score_spread":0.2610117290501156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1883598107","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004126203,0.99688715,0.000004581907,0.0023948618,0.00035624663,0.0000023318526,0.000015098182,9.888585e-7,0.00029740835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006386518,0.99817777,0.000013012179,0.00063013163,0.0002855514,0.0000035270339,0.00001713305,9.816792e-7,0.00023321611],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809045,0.00032735794,0.0001796218,0.00012428437,0.001043744,0.00023455267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922156,0.0023514873,0.0007520387,0.000075301934,0.0036357732,0.0009699062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027304953,0.0011335134,0.0024372914,0.005873808,0.0026418124,0.005575617,0.001761614,0.0027557677,0.0065625086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008899818,0.00078449247,0.00087728887,0.0122158285,0.0040104324,0.0023232233,0.001756564,0.0030685544,0.0010601429],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007936452,0.000042247128,0.0019237665,0.025912635,0.00019648043,0.00019569052,0.00096140953,0.00023533439,0.00009199433,0.0038294748,0.48779428,0.47873735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046711273,0.00006678598,0.023342326,0.0960692,0.00037547256,0.0008917609,0.0028336968,0.00013223372,0.00008539353,0.0013017054,0.87474805,0.00010663996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8006317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91982144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1993683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023405988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.096681185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40108478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963657152","doi":"10.1353/jwl.2006.0004","title":"Section 28 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms : A Purposive Interpretation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Interpretation (philosophy); Charter; Jurisprudence; Intersectionality; Sociology; Human rights; Law; Political science; Gender studies; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01426809576238141,"score_gpt":0.24288582967832187,"score_spread":0.22861773391594045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1963657152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02680847,0.00366504,0.020079948,0.050689127,0.001518673,0.00029156738,0.0008434317,0.00011519793,0.8959886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73534536,0.004213637,0.026054693,0.023409145,0.00045907125,0.0004669102,0.00056440453,0.00023409573,0.20925269],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98708445,0.002377333,0.0002877587,0.0015307277,0.006160073,0.0025595976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938864,0.0014522556,0.00030831867,0.00042632682,0.0033680457,0.0005586466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060727918,0.00076134107,0.00052515866,0.0034972797,0.016821327,0.011648168,0.0020812477,0.0025532432,0.004247226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008637393,0.0005401362,0.0007604227,0.0030420737,0.038578715,0.0025671439,0.004101401,0.005558363,0.0004021598],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007132612,0.0000032380283,0.0003419593,0.00002475978,0.0000022957008,0.00008372261,0.008193123,0.00016844006,0.00011526129,0.9715978,0.01461793,0.0048443475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001595856,0.00001769527,0.0051334663,0.00037429266,0.000021538543,0.00012020615,0.020066462,0.00083548686,0.0005996218,0.17985168,0.79285663,0.00010691845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96342033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.976757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07693836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07693836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17169568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5582295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964392752","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.22.2.505","title":"Marital Rape in Ghana: Legal Options for Achieving State Accountability","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Political science; Ethnology; Criminology; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.0253011249527358,"score_gpt":0.2932721723505293,"score_spread":0.26797104739779354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964392752","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37023947,0.006696284,0.014813162,0.12943228,0.0006355875,0.00044569932,0.00017216144,0.00011535555,0.47745004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9732891,0.0016203854,0.0023675011,0.0036535354,0.000091599766,0.00012424264,0.00002447925,0.000014604103,0.018814655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972582,0.0012251477,0.00013033368,0.00017174277,0.00041244863,0.00080214627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99521255,0.0026837555,0.00091147836,0.00037970097,0.00039297424,0.00041953623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044859373,0.00016389077,0.00017774328,0.0006167302,0.0055652205,0.0041861064,0.0009523814,0.0022417223,0.0140690245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012155367,0.0002474876,0.0001916903,0.00075155444,0.005450588,0.003510119,0.0047870865,0.0031698926,0.00049939414],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009188558,0.00007065001,0.021212762,0.00033625832,0.000012482912,0.002015846,0.04371438,0.0006977861,0.0015657342,0.842643,0.008816058,0.07882324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015467427,0.00028485275,0.056051914,0.0030837387,0.00006402678,0.0016683965,0.15264615,0.0021055238,0.0038053824,0.24513479,0.5349083,0.000092339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02669043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07763703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02669043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053609693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010919674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053070128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973171136","doi":"10.1353/jwl.2006.0013","title":"When \"Feminist Beliefs\" Became Credible as \"Political Opinions\": Returning to a Key Moment in Canadian Refugee Law","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Persecution; Refugee; Politics; Feminism; Law; Political science; State (computer science); Refugee law; Gender studies; Sociology; Criminology","score_opus":0.030506856629643322,"score_gpt":0.2866128359087433,"score_spread":0.2561059792791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973171136","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3032939,0.006293111,0.0019207626,0.19114767,0.0017605379,0.00010817894,0.00019485585,0.00008332844,0.49519768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9304081,0.0015582278,0.0004577873,0.01243038,0.0001245458,0.000035434943,0.000031855412,0.00007668626,0.054876916],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893852,0.0031426805,0.00012933285,0.00071940105,0.0026635781,0.003959803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946548,0.0019829073,0.0002677803,0.00017246016,0.0016758869,0.0012462208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007837132,0.0005332611,0.0005500016,0.0017785692,0.06734149,0.0198117,0.0026590226,0.007521227,0.009492288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014065347,0.0005447148,0.00040268633,0.0023387615,0.056677837,0.005532858,0.007789962,0.011037265,0.00057949126],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021141093,0.000012329139,0.0008769696,0.000040467774,0.000003198992,0.0007002144,0.8381378,0.000042124637,0.00033106934,0.13864796,0.013809068,0.0073776306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006663038,0.000011747156,0.0026541727,0.00020125652,0.0000072568964,0.00014251121,0.7158471,0.000052877815,0.00021746993,0.0046430123,0.27615988,0.00005608666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97800547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98929113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15334675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15334675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12838374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9819978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973840944","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.24.1.053","title":"Le degré de déqualification professionnelle et son effet sur les revenus d'emploi des femmes immigrantes membres d'une minorité visible du Québec","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Labor market dynamics and wage inequality","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Census; Job market; Human capital; Position (finance); Order (exchange); Sociology; Demographic economics; Political science; Economic growth; Business; Economics; Demography; Population; Law; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.03446745633205539,"score_gpt":0.2280285204328412,"score_spread":0.1935610641007858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973840944","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9891375,0.00089150644,0.00014870433,0.0029375642,0.00007212733,0.00004538285,0.00016507827,0.000018594577,0.0065835384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9787427,0.0013960154,0.00042536718,0.0008670008,0.000039269187,0.000034551478,0.00013887724,0.000009089982,0.018347027],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992085,0.00022776614,0.000021723203,0.000057027944,0.00020487646,0.00028011945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948025,0.0013202815,0.0005492825,0.0001574541,0.0016204908,0.0015499622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015153801,0.00032139916,0.0002535124,0.0004718045,0.0022799193,0.0011625577,0.0009029214,0.0011077052,0.00794405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009016981,0.00012516267,0.0003734508,0.00031622036,0.0008062453,0.00035919074,0.000685973,0.0009100135,0.0007405031],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023551914,0.0017893983,0.60262954,0.00038633202,0.000114221635,0.0014319725,0.015942236,0.00080744113,0.0038807215,0.0007991195,0.014144775,0.355719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005421885,0.001273019,0.9667272,0.0002650807,0.000054098404,0.00029023987,0.015322789,0.00079364004,0.00071030017,0.00011692646,0.01435767,0.00003491843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.74813217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88016933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25186783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004047762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005462504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50670224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977077970","doi":"10.1353/jwl.2006.0017","title":"Granovsky v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration) : Adding Insult to Injury?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insult; Immigration; Political science; Law; Demographic economics; Economics","score_opus":0.01984727827338229,"score_gpt":0.26385912846239407,"score_spread":0.24401185018901178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977077970","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08039592,0.03078859,0.0010475853,0.3835855,0.00438863,0.000082376086,0.00043178763,0.00008054125,0.49919912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56606656,0.013007453,0.00079240446,0.22194597,0.0008775762,0.000048865502,0.0001771241,0.000090111374,0.19699395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940679,0.00039501535,0.000098950404,0.00035997495,0.0017576803,0.003320547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981463,0.00040500803,0.00010001518,0.000056388853,0.0007083679,0.00058397267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018966916,0.0002923562,0.00037064496,0.0011517692,0.029098805,0.009500805,0.0024579698,0.010000263,0.0057402747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005681019,0.0004078471,0.00045174581,0.0015505353,0.012242705,0.0022173729,0.0040531964,0.010393659,0.0004977479],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079231984,0.00002917137,0.0080480445,0.0001273355,0.000022494707,0.0018922583,0.02530024,0.00030295626,0.0004343607,0.7339883,0.19642335,0.033352315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003622256,0.00003122556,0.0143332435,0.0008132262,0.000058873855,0.0004804642,0.029613744,0.00017297058,0.00053176127,0.027917404,0.9258909,0.00011985985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9884666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9953798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08249721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08249721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18903065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59856194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977463325","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.25.2.315","title":"Assisted Human Reproduction in Common Law Canada after the Supreme Court of Canada Reference: Moving beyond Regulation by Colleges of Physicians and Surgeons","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Reproduction; Legislation; Law; Supreme court; Commission; Legislature; Common law; Human reproduction; Political science; Human fertility; Sociology; Medicine; Fertility; Population; Politics; Biology","score_opus":0.016614876357348627,"score_gpt":0.23437218755622274,"score_spread":0.21775731119887412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977463325","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03254937,0.01734493,0.0049771136,0.6340491,0.0049955714,0.00030622762,0.0007765579,0.00020180957,0.30479926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4536069,0.0074778027,0.004744458,0.33296466,0.0016132002,0.00013331292,0.00033990285,0.00013416568,0.19898555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98230714,0.0017650981,0.00046168803,0.0020006055,0.0076931533,0.0057723313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812749,0.005030906,0.000632347,0.0008089929,0.008686921,0.0035658851],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010210177,0.000501384,0.00058318954,0.0011177767,0.023420194,0.011754572,0.0029834828,0.016663156,0.006123121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022626484,0.0007443311,0.00093863456,0.0018875567,0.014166751,0.002702145,0.003012186,0.015971715,0.0005849596],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004089484,0.00003504619,0.0026295187,0.000075056036,0.000027158903,0.00080678955,0.004335178,0.0005339176,0.0005918356,0.75633615,0.21386443,0.020724062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007437038,0.00005129963,0.0077414643,0.0004494082,0.000064368694,0.00021912956,0.00257076,0.0011016674,0.00068058097,0.030086273,0.9567506,0.00021008891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99122834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84462327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15537673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3738722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9796433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977853240","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.25.1.031","title":"More Than an Empty Gesture: Enabling Women with Mental Disabilities to Testify on a Promise to Tell the Truth","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.026538420942600217,"score_gpt":0.2682822348483122,"score_spread":0.24174381390571198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977853240","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69310296,0.0010663099,0.005986019,0.109142624,0.000927287,0.00044806345,0.00010812972,0.00022963085,0.18898897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.962786,0.00069293746,0.0029259506,0.006908929,0.0000669552,0.00026639126,0.000037166166,0.000034804936,0.026280908],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931202,0.0040595145,0.00013251802,0.00030665053,0.0006504192,0.0017307433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98972565,0.004724198,0.0009247929,0.00048656517,0.0006832076,0.0034555802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00535006,0.0004389516,0.00037059802,0.0004817018,0.012550338,0.0061681997,0.0015197984,0.0030451817,0.014181363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0235596,0.00036720358,0.0004168456,0.00032836536,0.009507588,0.0047739986,0.008931899,0.0038650373,0.0019122298],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032143315,0.0016169582,0.027239105,0.00032593345,0.000026686108,0.0018421652,0.6847619,0.0003193047,0.0031287118,0.036050685,0.046980586,0.19738658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007009498,0.000388098,0.017244441,0.00049566303,0.00003992395,0.0003194149,0.80007493,0.00042879948,0.0010967419,0.01350174,0.16624351,0.000096674536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04983425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15124601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95016575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044095754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016614331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09908837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980176298","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.22.1.247","title":"Empty Promises: Why Income Splitting for the Disabled Community Is Nothing to Get Excited About","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.037144047068654824,"score_gpt":0.29780889080218953,"score_spread":0.2606648437335347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980176298","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29119053,0.005051503,0.0050887,0.4349582,0.0007339807,0.00011432734,0.00049270975,0.0001194838,0.26225063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9729064,0.0012010809,0.00053312717,0.011441313,0.00011549812,0.00003533883,0.00004141489,0.000046960693,0.013678899],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99538594,0.0013582279,0.00007998592,0.00035214282,0.0009234012,0.0019002769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99538875,0.00131926,0.0004260205,0.00032894642,0.00083786115,0.0016991519],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00487181,0.00027034665,0.00043024754,0.0009105682,0.013125212,0.007457272,0.0019012186,0.0032637739,0.015751202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012023398,0.00025755467,0.0005226227,0.001086396,0.015243689,0.006516588,0.006800111,0.0036264788,0.0011548206],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023183595,0.00012269894,0.0445179,0.0002817152,0.00007009929,0.0011108383,0.08225984,0.0007095134,0.0005359167,0.705549,0.07602464,0.08858603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009127885,0.00009074921,0.06229452,0.0010815082,0.00010371172,0.00059288385,0.26611808,0.0011079165,0.0008791929,0.31313044,0.3544047,0.00010510801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3740033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6030267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6259967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015120187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027002072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7436527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983449548","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.24.2.359","title":"Governing Heterosexuality through Specific Consent: Interrogating the Governmental Effects of <i>R. v J.A.</i>","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.054611553892183494,"score_gpt":0.29911875420017175,"score_spread":0.24450720030798825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983449548","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17016625,0.0060502416,0.01104759,0.24263665,0.0010138932,0.00032151365,0.00008327298,0.00006886837,0.5686117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9351201,0.0013253799,0.0013216496,0.03721569,0.00017180815,0.00013033792,0.000012999338,0.000026889491,0.024675092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98232967,0.008001385,0.00048275696,0.0018802162,0.0036246884,0.003681214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98460394,0.010672942,0.0009372665,0.001075037,0.0018538288,0.0008570897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023471214,0.00041119746,0.00050954224,0.0005667747,0.018837677,0.008140968,0.0022639504,0.010951026,0.002257771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022417028,0.0004553324,0.00057133666,0.0006831943,0.06034471,0.003917675,0.0065891445,0.014548987,0.00024299687],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017705628,0.000019454916,0.00086636416,0.000030777494,0.0000065900517,0.000251758,0.0614889,0.00008740135,0.00038039277,0.9278167,0.004647062,0.004386864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000108326065,0.00011801126,0.006329231,0.00080057164,0.00012605485,0.0004813374,0.118660666,0.0007580499,0.0030672692,0.3829817,0.4863706,0.00019808339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5295945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6072351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47040552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028236603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056523923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94635165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983637270","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.22.2.365","title":"“Doing No Violence to the Sentence Imposed”: Racialized Sex Worker Complainants, Racialized Offenders, and the Feminization of the <i>Homo Sacer</i> in Two Sexual Assault Cases","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015614362843812587,"score_gpt":0.27659840156060317,"score_spread":0.2609840387167906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983637270","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928186,0.00019857021,0.00004237249,0.0015054665,0.000019095498,0.000013180325,0.000011413061,8.935156e-7,0.0053905244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99862623,0.00020367074,0.000027120097,0.00025761622,0.000016849886,0.000012922299,0.000011360751,0.0000017541882,0.00084247586],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997865,0.0009060254,0.000101100995,0.00013921103,0.000250962,0.00073761516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996673,0.0010819033,0.0015943936,0.00011554122,0.00019850412,0.00033661842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016163151,0.00024574876,0.000247301,0.0014098919,0.0061705615,0.0021447355,0.0008105668,0.0016786044,0.0032682307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067335246,0.00033296342,0.00032204264,0.00091129297,0.005402319,0.0014935575,0.0028343687,0.0025269026,0.00017856936],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013521628,0.00030229965,0.33449367,0.00007737845,0.000025798658,0.013336069,0.62207544,0.00008185982,0.00072203815,0.014884543,0.0018872055,0.011978482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075439693,0.00008519306,0.3117923,0.00017084731,0.00002453326,0.006000624,0.67433774,0.00016153487,0.00039762573,0.001436696,0.00555647,0.000028959837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055850707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12080809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9441493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023253772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024301729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11105126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984920196","doi":"10.1353/jwl.2006.0015","title":"Defining Moments for Women as Lawyers: Reflections on Numerical Gender Equality","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gender equality; Sociology; Mathematics; Gender studies; Calculus (dental); Medicine","score_opus":0.11300095921226927,"score_gpt":0.4067852068891015,"score_spread":0.29378424767683226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984920196","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09413182,0.016888754,0.004337269,0.5448291,0.006540692,0.00008816643,0.00008176371,0.00006915202,0.33303326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8527471,0.004864856,0.00095184473,0.06960289,0.0016240386,0.00011474679,0.00002450656,0.0001232597,0.06994675],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855409,0.008787121,0.00018538516,0.00066370494,0.0016994895,0.0031233248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99112284,0.005270687,0.0006795752,0.00017778232,0.00092646107,0.0018226502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009321851,0.0005831695,0.0006391963,0.0016591856,0.048803505,0.020646514,0.0031050916,0.008901585,0.0068073156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013458732,0.0005908126,0.0005468292,0.0014935952,0.06626887,0.012358349,0.011927614,0.01276683,0.00071269117],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015907754,0.000013752971,0.00034960965,0.000041284915,0.0000019774639,0.0004039268,0.7854349,0.000019690813,0.0001577235,0.19480509,0.015217423,0.0035386777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005038988,0.000011843797,0.00050502317,0.00016253501,0.0000027516612,0.00011211007,0.7431369,0.000024944482,0.00011104271,0.011200076,0.24471207,0.000015757423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25571266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43519405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96061075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03938928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024716785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5084485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988275482","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.24.1.180","title":"Pensions and Unpaid Work: A Reflection on Four Decades of Feminist Debate","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Ethnology; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.08528839096400993,"score_gpt":0.3209305273734365,"score_spread":0.2356421364094266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988275482","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08424483,0.086620905,0.0010186778,0.7154859,0.001788624,0.000017078957,0.00013273867,0.000013752675,0.11067758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8440077,0.05489712,0.0003830994,0.054869406,0.0022053714,0.000043488024,0.000038784285,0.00006040646,0.043494727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99254006,0.0035383855,0.00014831343,0.0005682464,0.0013138393,0.0018912486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99085766,0.007179473,0.0003806767,0.00019841155,0.00075485243,0.00062886014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013878148,0.00040857794,0.0006007141,0.0020033647,0.01602647,0.009908934,0.0012800461,0.006357278,0.00564694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010218637,0.00034054654,0.0003306003,0.0030630368,0.044674285,0.007312238,0.0045837616,0.0068964013,0.00026869617],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004074685,0.000017674449,0.0012579781,0.00012204794,0.000006640053,0.0002677639,0.24710223,0.00014766365,0.00012653827,0.7073794,0.023751196,0.019780086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008770262,0.000016363503,0.0042687324,0.0009123544,0.0000057766847,0.00010087595,0.22577481,0.00007910025,0.00016776197,0.033859618,0.7347728,0.000033063003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5006252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6370428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4993748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053267665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026490986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9954225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988913116","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.21.2.229","title":"Shifting Rationales: The Waning Influence of Feminism on Canada’s Embryo Research Restrictions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Legislature; Legislation; Context (archaeology); Commission; Reproductive technology; Reproduction; Politics; Government (linguistics); Political science; Feminism; Sociology; Law; Embryo; Biology","score_opus":0.0562757672112782,"score_gpt":0.32172476483899964,"score_spread":0.26544899762772145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988913116","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05703558,0.01821574,0.0037523822,0.68355,0.0013683884,0.000066031156,0.0002043443,0.000054905293,0.2357527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.818507,0.010225634,0.001991669,0.13454518,0.00067536935,0.00007070358,0.000069259324,0.00011325446,0.03380184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96033955,0.011348119,0.0007602867,0.0034074986,0.018244734,0.0058997567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93289274,0.046597924,0.00207918,0.0017154586,0.011832584,0.0048820656],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037756648,0.00035796384,0.00068377407,0.0029090468,0.03456461,0.016863862,0.0029867496,0.0087219365,0.005711845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041680872,0.00087262527,0.0006038153,0.0034100213,0.0620148,0.0048503187,0.007822292,0.014101642,0.00031770256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035176206,0.000013363917,0.0015706498,0.00008584372,0.000012548013,0.00024345628,0.039596654,0.00016167111,0.0003855073,0.9086884,0.028791934,0.020414889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007107195,0.000028180159,0.0073245186,0.00077186874,0.000040489856,0.00012840987,0.03824018,0.0003707939,0.00085061044,0.08224334,0.8697876,0.00014288821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9677441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98204803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9654354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19713879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3001549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9312052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989128565","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.24.2.328","title":"<i>Every Breath You Take:</i> Erotic Asphyxiation, Vengeful Wives, and Other Enduring Myths in Spousal Sexual Assault Prosecutions","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Sexual assault; Mythology; Ethnology; Poison control; Art; Sociology; Philosophy; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Theology; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.03551256597344329,"score_gpt":0.27377217759016564,"score_spread":0.23825961161672235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989128565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40113005,0.03992436,0.0022500474,0.31950212,0.0015112789,0.00007707283,0.00008618939,0.000033054665,0.23548587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9613874,0.00734107,0.00031608407,0.013327836,0.00020231366,0.000021500233,0.00001241839,0.000014338,0.017377017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768484,0.0009988009,0.000049386945,0.000110708424,0.0004142859,0.0007420805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857855,0.00057052437,0.00026427043,0.00005631233,0.0002550572,0.0002752361],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022734876,0.0002348412,0.00027286494,0.000851719,0.01812279,0.0075611896,0.0011884669,0.0030627877,0.0022682813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032830767,0.00022862937,0.00018520492,0.00084378483,0.037634797,0.002600943,0.0034872352,0.0052656303,0.0001641579],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003969931,0.000040272487,0.009096051,0.00018447841,0.000016734424,0.00079670927,0.43982232,0.00011718939,0.00025212756,0.5008629,0.021554666,0.02721685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012323412,0.000033229233,0.014166009,0.0010084662,0.000031336152,0.0010810152,0.68558717,0.00016125785,0.0004078709,0.034259073,0.26320606,0.00004620555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.64554507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80444336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35445493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01852991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033721484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71308476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992339314","doi":"10.1353/jwl.2006.0002","title":"\"Pleasing Appearance. . . Only Adds to the Danger\": The 1930 Insanity Hearing of Violet Hypatia Bowyer","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Tribunal; Courage; Insanity; Humanities; Law; Art; Political science; Ethnology; Sociology","score_opus":0.036169077184268324,"score_gpt":0.29822477236844896,"score_spread":0.26205569518418065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992339314","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20117633,0.010429887,0.0006641089,0.49927312,0.009089954,0.0000707155,0.00015444876,0.000117742056,0.2790237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6474225,0.0035298273,0.00033152083,0.10718704,0.0012942515,0.00002736482,0.000057323665,0.00012674415,0.24002334],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985459,0.00034067067,0.000015405356,0.00011178852,0.0003672609,0.00061906374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899215,0.00033005036,0.00005014971,0.000027866501,0.00023480847,0.00036496297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012094035,0.0003906478,0.00032657618,0.00033806788,0.044489857,0.0051260167,0.0010263122,0.004339171,0.006304445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003277469,0.0004262603,0.0002001243,0.00032647065,0.010092188,0.0016800395,0.0032534595,0.0114508625,0.00087886356],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015358478,0.000061012386,0.0036098347,0.00012180997,0.0000151628565,0.006919991,0.26730433,0.000098439654,0.0017393123,0.046901908,0.64267635,0.030398207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017987966,0.000042074465,0.0065866467,0.0002627422,0.000015644902,0.0014239419,0.23569903,0.00009735355,0.0005690957,0.0019679128,0.7532471,0.00007045556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7249193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9056553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27508068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01629789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015301878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55340135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992897212","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.26.1.23","title":"Race Matters: Sexism, Indigenous Sovereignty, and <i>McIvor</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Indigenous; Injustice; Transformative learning; Gender studies; Race (biology); Sociology; Colonialism; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Racism; Economic Justice; Dominance (genetics); Law; Politics","score_opus":0.019065747396475985,"score_gpt":0.25121861528699324,"score_spread":0.23215286789051726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992897212","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17442621,0.029037429,0.0009029382,0.27029023,0.0007976891,0.0000333038,0.000045990244,0.000016951633,0.52444935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9542149,0.0039053408,0.00019868888,0.017706683,0.00033421308,0.000024122137,0.00000826705,0.000009928694,0.023597984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778724,0.0009652368,0.000032934164,0.00018335879,0.00035689693,0.0006742753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990132,0.00045403402,0.00012654289,0.000040754985,0.000141376,0.00022403467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023357836,0.00023782204,0.00026909506,0.0008432889,0.019720705,0.0076561337,0.0011598185,0.0033871667,0.0027768908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024806315,0.00018172868,0.00026279647,0.0007286199,0.0452673,0.003865023,0.003959552,0.0039210483,0.0001218709],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000939227,0.000017865532,0.0017398585,0.000036594087,0.0000045890097,0.00034893642,0.1324839,0.000030234423,0.00009598452,0.8508634,0.008727696,0.005641587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020941978,0.000041694235,0.013115365,0.0008755762,0.00003820237,0.000540952,0.35479778,0.00018712257,0.00048532104,0.23172845,0.3981138,0.000054803895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.51341975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6168397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48658025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013836764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015230338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9788917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993372504","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.22.2.397","title":"Sexual Assault Law, Credibility, and “Ideal Victims”: Consent, Resistance, and Victim Blaming","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":228,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Criminology; Art; Sociology","score_opus":0.03614340751261584,"score_gpt":0.2932548257744881,"score_spread":0.2571114182618722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993372504","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6201942,0.009502662,0.006741678,0.08982874,0.00032017514,0.0001074688,0.00003934779,0.000047036316,0.2732186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995337,0.00086881284,0.00022756623,0.0012930721,0.000059129154,0.000017113904,0.0000048622755,0.000007727389,0.0021846099],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98845196,0.008980297,0.00023024048,0.0003664955,0.0012826594,0.00068848376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9720615,0.020036696,0.003734859,0.0011311144,0.0015990369,0.0014368239],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009686802,0.00028982022,0.00029736618,0.0020265528,0.0037700352,0.008757471,0.0012627767,0.0038690805,0.0059032203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04085688,0.00029750544,0.0002674081,0.0008549449,0.037031785,0.008888335,0.0048091956,0.004852273,0.00036004785],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010116238,0.00019622025,0.013065252,0.00015050641,0.000024153107,0.0008440016,0.30348745,0.00026339898,0.0002931291,0.64961886,0.003674349,0.028281579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000088689536,0.00017545471,0.024887599,0.0013760426,0.000042391235,0.0020651303,0.41041026,0.002109777,0.0007378692,0.50228876,0.05568008,0.00013801541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00445203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034442425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99554795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030915283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003273219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051229298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001427335","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.23.2.627","title":"Do Women Refugee Judges Really Make a Difference? An Empirical Analysis of Gender and Outcomes in Canadian Refugee Determinations","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Political science; Humanities; Palestinian refugees; Ethnology; Sociology; Art; Law","score_opus":0.06603884986615195,"score_gpt":0.3096297230078696,"score_spread":0.24359087314171768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001427335","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9880554,0.00046540616,0.000086550834,0.0009407548,0.000027749236,0.000035055044,0.00020319373,0.0000027505928,0.010183084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99673456,0.00030982445,0.000059624646,0.00015624914,0.000008077032,0.00001493358,0.00010154883,0.0000042204288,0.0026110008],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950411,0.0009869887,0.00014007885,0.00040867308,0.0015378746,0.0018853507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894986,0.0024830091,0.0029053509,0.0003699496,0.002743661,0.001999302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051118084,0.0002848738,0.000498366,0.001891213,0.00824466,0.0030555557,0.0010668229,0.0006956573,0.004751277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024518194,0.00026989414,0.00030768674,0.0032875282,0.0052893083,0.0010150863,0.0027573733,0.0014358617,0.0003875162],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027102797,0.000131295,0.7951334,0.00011127814,0.000043279404,0.0005130795,0.17009018,0.00010517602,0.00038717402,0.0046630227,0.004185832,0.02436527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000095824425,0.00004403176,0.8174431,0.0001232802,0.000019601854,0.00006331262,0.17234136,0.00011401957,0.0001484429,0.00037092448,0.009290249,0.000031994554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9277367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9684221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0722633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018878244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023292862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1453777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002490768","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.23.1.235","title":"Global Care Chains, Employment Agencies, and the Conundrum of Jurisdiction: Decent Work for Domestic Workers in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.023281587627638628,"score_gpt":0.24124192833384073,"score_spread":0.2179603407062021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002490768","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.919266,0.0033377786,0.00039058385,0.020080881,0.00012017624,0.000063571926,0.00042299877,0.000015293359,0.05630276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864608,0.0018543595,0.00013304365,0.0007017437,0.000013167177,0.000016797801,0.00009189038,0.000009314604,0.010718886],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971643,0.00021425799,0.000047753332,0.00015765913,0.00040445832,0.0020115732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964896,0.00042406024,0.0003387878,0.00008873946,0.0006873056,0.0019714928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095791713,0.00022446495,0.0003329028,0.0018661442,0.016912296,0.0071448493,0.001956555,0.0013640728,0.008914896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003434454,0.00028543,0.00027278796,0.004999143,0.008581619,0.002099655,0.0070220856,0.0022129305,0.00025180998],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016028043,0.0001692684,0.35075405,0.0003794523,0.000051002924,0.0036373287,0.36665058,0.0010813123,0.00057609024,0.1610718,0.019713148,0.095755726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018150013,0.000036198304,0.23024371,0.00058583345,0.000026435124,0.0002747205,0.68765014,0.00039101517,0.00013335975,0.0038299302,0.07676075,0.00004968958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9938612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99837804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09375973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09375973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16254394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68027765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002968574","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.23.2.405","title":"The Gendered Dimensions of Sexting: Assessing the Applicability of Canada's Child Pornography Provision","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Gender, Feminism, and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Psychology; Pornography; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.03587047074757947,"score_gpt":0.25650473101982807,"score_spread":0.22063426027224858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002968574","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9800178,0.00022972624,0.0002867643,0.00033291517,0.000021224867,0.000081140846,0.00024521956,0.000006831008,0.018778298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99390244,0.0003848289,0.0006166611,0.00008669532,0.000005200077,0.000044889817,0.00015587115,0.000006420454,0.0047969613],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813384,0.00032359027,0.00007627119,0.00009124829,0.0010579784,0.00031703833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936731,0.0009714954,0.0016379515,0.00031603684,0.0023671817,0.0010341766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022476772,0.00021225255,0.00012355494,0.0009515981,0.0023134262,0.0013729015,0.000897749,0.00039921864,0.0031357105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0125089865,0.00019322848,0.00029063429,0.001219004,0.0024329012,0.000490863,0.00147448,0.00073639525,0.00017799021],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015870019,0.000088068104,0.88986164,0.00010524321,0.00003456864,0.0003191204,0.05934836,0.00024934538,0.0011485381,0.0023705256,0.001378439,0.04493758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036764989,0.000068499976,0.94305235,0.000091728325,0.00001909433,0.00012652077,0.04650659,0.000219907,0.00046919732,0.00016305767,0.009259565,0.000019842731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88161284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9489325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11838716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011839277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018874211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23816872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003420303","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.26.2.05","title":"Taking It Personally: Delimiting Gender-Based Refugee Claims Using the Complementary Protection Provision in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Denial; Persecution; Criminology; Covert; Torture; Oppression; Performative utterance; Refugee law; Law; Political science; Sociology; Human rights; Psychology","score_opus":0.08391561068537427,"score_gpt":0.28680214850403596,"score_spread":0.20288653781866167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003420303","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6868527,0.004662647,0.0040818076,0.03948735,0.00030175937,0.0004179093,0.001020957,0.00006659235,0.2631083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97343034,0.0019377164,0.0042222147,0.003319599,0.00001983162,0.000086096006,0.00020478567,0.000028765704,0.016750693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99230367,0.0012967881,0.00021772388,0.00044842556,0.002378328,0.0033549368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924724,0.0022709013,0.0004989324,0.00034613855,0.0030180549,0.0013936185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058444696,0.00036232523,0.0005246676,0.003281467,0.025423232,0.009032345,0.0023414341,0.0017247268,0.004320969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016275262,0.0005150295,0.00055341364,0.004849009,0.010015843,0.0020183607,0.0060594515,0.0027464672,0.0002393101],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035243138,0.00021105779,0.14271292,0.00053337234,0.00007962568,0.0018292872,0.18638721,0.0028341934,0.0017300937,0.37664348,0.06088109,0.22580527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009111757,0.00016044914,0.22556755,0.0015928532,0.00023039262,0.0004954423,0.36247241,0.0042641237,0.0030351817,0.026971756,0.37471762,0.00040113073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9970452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15922846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15922846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29354748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9751758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005008668","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.25.2.183","title":"The Tale of Assisted Human Reproduction Canada: A Tragedy in Five Acts","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reproduction; Human reproduction; Agency (philosophy); Political science; Law; Sociology; Biology; Ecology; Social science; Genetics","score_opus":0.024156253641964293,"score_gpt":0.25603190706572004,"score_spread":0.23187565342375574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005008668","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019832006,0.02142969,0.0030184998,0.69624114,0.004156557,0.00006658077,0.0004101641,0.00013348201,0.25471187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45412156,0.020350454,0.0045258706,0.31917855,0.0016054421,0.00011259654,0.00035241366,0.0002510977,0.19950204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9843612,0.0018242238,0.000257537,0.0008453381,0.008885043,0.003826712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915377,0.0020758577,0.00033020755,0.00037002232,0.003164406,0.0025216744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006278405,0.0005328514,0.00040881598,0.0019457113,0.047475096,0.012287295,0.00277568,0.008945371,0.00578094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013508407,0.00051061675,0.00052827795,0.0030897346,0.029992796,0.003786105,0.005156885,0.015324029,0.0006674099],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000202438,0.000019032948,0.0014738751,0.000052449017,0.000010028033,0.00042385992,0.018691743,0.00017811308,0.0001413305,0.5845735,0.3600143,0.034401584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066450843,0.000011205183,0.0023511602,0.000262308,0.000015551146,0.00017660981,0.012618246,0.00018554961,0.00015122209,0.016279746,0.96788067,0.000061166764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96726817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9829486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.095656976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.095656976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21243487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69404316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005671913","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.22.1.001","title":"L'analyse comparative entre les sexes : la difficile mise en œuvre du droit à l'égalité. Analyse du Rapport de la vérificatrice générale du Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Parliament; Government (linguistics); Legislation; Political science; Convention; Audit; Public administration; Law; Management; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.020438838011045388,"score_gpt":0.2643106599260179,"score_spread":0.24387182191497248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005671913","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1413835,0.13142993,0.0050166366,0.22014269,0.0038353468,0.00010131361,0.000977603,0.00011644123,0.49699655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81631696,0.029790698,0.0020943289,0.018516688,0.0003786633,0.000052707685,0.00020634044,0.00015643214,0.13248715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864761,0.0023001847,0.00021927227,0.0009264177,0.007691993,0.0023859746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915758,0.0029540313,0.0005085681,0.00028529135,0.0039356686,0.0007407541],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071645826,0.0004005727,0.00053373154,0.0038412479,0.018925384,0.013255782,0.0017983065,0.0024226855,0.006639116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015119292,0.0005076419,0.00046000784,0.0067117615,0.020276641,0.003535206,0.0049460237,0.0038644536,0.00041436826],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000469233,0.000018600562,0.009295719,0.00028655323,0.000029650568,0.000590048,0.11222176,0.0002642376,0.0005202872,0.65503967,0.0952564,0.12643015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074248337,0.000015650628,0.027522407,0.0006741646,0.000026864345,0.0002797253,0.091103725,0.00019812051,0.0006276221,0.014109585,0.86536777,0.000066995795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9853998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99036753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90174675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09825324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16078712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7128805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011710302","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.25.1.148","title":"The Case for the Federation of Law Societies Rejecting Trinity Western University's Proposed Law Degree Program","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Academic freedom; Sexual orientation; Legal profession; Sociology; Higher education","score_opus":0.054975110701719655,"score_gpt":0.2780333447581323,"score_spread":0.22305823405641265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011710302","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.096987985,0.0019185407,0.0022253913,0.7098708,0.0034585712,0.0001586346,0.00008352061,0.000055929635,0.18524064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70575696,0.0007476693,0.0016810982,0.19851936,0.0012675287,0.00036785772,0.00010470514,0.000082096114,0.09147268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.963765,0.0081950985,0.00097313186,0.0036181842,0.0050323657,0.018416146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9596395,0.008792861,0.0030598934,0.0025970663,0.007559104,0.018351605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038788185,0.00047348047,0.0009389387,0.0013912924,0.045797076,0.02156348,0.004817752,0.031174615,0.010723339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057357673,0.0008333431,0.0011036047,0.0015087475,0.022813153,0.008625862,0.014799536,0.026921064,0.0011098916],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088048946,0.000086645516,0.007758182,0.00005753854,0.000021638483,0.000803035,0.015021454,0.0002627548,0.0002134988,0.8571518,0.10746945,0.011065857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017383891,0.00013181716,0.019091433,0.00082056195,0.00006739319,0.0004538971,0.046814706,0.0011931871,0.00046376145,0.08945654,0.8411162,0.00021675784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3992607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4872733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6007393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031009484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11817084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7938735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015897128","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.26.1.116","title":"Taking “Culture” out of Multiculturalism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Religion, Society, and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Politics; Sociology; Secularism; Political science; Gender studies; Islam; Racism; Inequality; Norm (philosophy); Public sphere; Political economy; Law","score_opus":0.029096648690662703,"score_gpt":0.27395342025699343,"score_spread":0.24485677156633073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015897128","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05636457,0.024108067,0.009290257,0.312221,0.0038159313,0.00006309303,0.000060182265,0.00007793862,0.59399897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9020965,0.007601305,0.0029149104,0.058611564,0.0009638332,0.00006305051,0.00002719865,0.000087946806,0.027633648],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99153155,0.0050486666,0.000135219,0.00058358343,0.001309902,0.0013910724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99455523,0.0013325382,0.0005139901,0.0006853777,0.001368908,0.001543951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054591196,0.0007102455,0.00059496146,0.0012871884,0.018818794,0.014954193,0.0016972059,0.0031197828,0.0048289998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004555463,0.0002774923,0.0004935257,0.0011220253,0.07842185,0.008385028,0.010743203,0.008544605,0.0005459962],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011002618,0.000018955709,0.0015555456,0.000094629715,0.000015205348,0.00018693849,0.077243,0.00012914417,0.00024585213,0.889338,0.0168878,0.014273912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013115733,0.000032253796,0.0042962884,0.0008747676,0.000022686692,0.00029349062,0.0914839,0.0002859353,0.00037985,0.36416194,0.5381048,0.00005092982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17833312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20237717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8216669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021162458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021454303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35459018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024055326","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.21.1.1","title":"<i>Rapport minoritaire</i> : La dissidence fait juge","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Unanimity; Vision; Variety (cybernetics); Relation (database); Parallels; State (computer science); Sociology; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Theology; Computer science","score_opus":0.018422563699260944,"score_gpt":0.2548530868836951,"score_spread":0.2364305231844342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024055326","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14297275,0.013087562,0.009309543,0.24786845,0.009713537,0.00006318446,0.00020522482,0.0001563547,0.5766233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9240973,0.003256736,0.001617381,0.009085591,0.0028121446,0.000044590335,0.000052963896,0.000091546746,0.05894168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851495,0.00077854196,0.000043552627,0.0001751078,0.00031326088,0.00017450549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997405,0.0014529299,0.000344441,0.00013427155,0.00035742566,0.00030586496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020597568,0.00031986894,0.00023999605,0.0005485872,0.0050448924,0.005020785,0.00072334695,0.002098761,0.005542085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011114144,0.00013853055,0.00016937184,0.00042993922,0.008289701,0.0036730394,0.002086803,0.0051753875,0.00082900084],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102924736,0.00003723874,0.0037014778,0.00016366837,0.000018544171,0.0015555058,0.29349974,0.00008064753,0.0024092018,0.55321306,0.1110333,0.03418471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013243491,0.00007087179,0.0055214274,0.00031992773,0.000018408717,0.0020147103,0.11744139,0.00028133095,0.0019194228,0.022044804,0.85030514,0.00004935551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016773075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015496007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9832269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022753347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014199628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033350885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028674168","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.23.2.519","title":"A Tale of Two Cultures: Intimate Femicide, Cultural Defences, and the Law of Provocation","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Ethnology; Jurisprudence; Provocation test; Philosophy; Sociology; Theology","score_opus":0.02916426186936547,"score_gpt":0.2698131775472888,"score_spread":0.24064891567792332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028674168","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23014367,0.036885984,0.008339892,0.16897106,0.001552614,0.000046941295,0.00007008174,0.00003711372,0.5539526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97650707,0.0040022214,0.0005589923,0.005471912,0.00031196885,0.0000376225,0.000008548113,0.000020793332,0.013080877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927591,0.005542995,0.00009577417,0.00037141115,0.0005590245,0.0006716917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948133,0.0031045987,0.00069154677,0.00049889454,0.00044237747,0.00044937967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036681201,0.0005038809,0.00042780655,0.0018850976,0.010177754,0.010507216,0.001221642,0.003834421,0.004770289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008829718,0.00027015829,0.00041812196,0.0013527857,0.06604651,0.0085023185,0.008293328,0.007148764,0.00035017641],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021315353,0.000013308335,0.0011835985,0.000045660214,0.0000058387077,0.00016505452,0.052998245,0.00006027723,0.00007681613,0.9377281,0.0019644732,0.0057372283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038571663,0.00010327433,0.006132896,0.0010355063,0.000038739843,0.00064936234,0.24874239,0.00037685974,0.0007376261,0.5454324,0.19664736,0.00006501187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012758117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015315383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012758117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006126627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004141169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04445201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029132037","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.23.2.579","title":"The Practices of Lesbian Mothers and Quebec's Reforms","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Ethnology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.03637481338695226,"score_gpt":0.24360036924634573,"score_spread":0.20722555585939348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029132037","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86221004,0.0040746946,0.0005804814,0.023622908,0.00010501066,0.00006951062,0.000100314406,0.000031298547,0.10920569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9570774,0.0008162176,0.00024714804,0.0012796127,0.000008661472,0.000029847626,0.000018029381,0.000008352708,0.040514853],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783,0.0009979502,0.000034161396,0.00015353561,0.00031523654,0.0006692175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978435,0.00058602344,0.00029074962,0.000114311464,0.00056406413,0.0006014059],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022789238,0.00024149768,0.00020706608,0.00070679514,0.019571466,0.0036965937,0.0008516698,0.0013419624,0.006276716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042698476,0.00022932734,0.00009386245,0.0010920506,0.006679041,0.0008423846,0.002034663,0.0016767324,0.00021247365],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008844783,0.00007001431,0.0275299,0.0001324438,0.000015084424,0.001214692,0.77427137,0.00027751277,0.0017458284,0.124171115,0.016786026,0.05369761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021798012,0.000080863574,0.08107803,0.0004837081,0.000025086083,0.00021150614,0.48777005,0.00039793676,0.00082703587,0.0020197749,0.42701885,0.00006533884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.968967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9876078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.070022754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.070022754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04720948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50805306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030458703","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.24.2.301","title":"Minority of One: Violet King's Entry to the Legal Profession","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art; Ethnology; Sociology","score_opus":0.021098969128464883,"score_gpt":0.24481920978910704,"score_spread":0.22372024066064217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030458703","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.447884,0.0021957578,0.00033272625,0.053514082,0.0019632084,0.000054509106,0.00023797885,0.00004833151,0.49376935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59162873,0.00076738273,0.00012978577,0.0100448895,0.000111949994,0.000015194584,0.00009458328,0.000054428063,0.39715305],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763167,0.00020632132,0.000032875938,0.00023054636,0.00040603508,0.0014925826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974412,0.00017604645,0.00010296647,0.00006547469,0.00045524444,0.0017590089],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011130198,0.00018230717,0.00031520694,0.0005098622,0.024639772,0.005933032,0.00095387705,0.0016453116,0.027760223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002388136,0.00019025852,0.00021274775,0.00042349056,0.0028735853,0.0019470323,0.0051604575,0.0041549336,0.003938255],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035811824,0.0003504375,0.07759216,0.00013301095,0.000013762562,0.0057199495,0.32632443,0.000117246374,0.0026452942,0.18383183,0.28867638,0.11423746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001625859,0.00008847455,0.031410586,0.0002174695,0.000010369567,0.001094141,0.19554271,0.0000784295,0.00041291167,0.002135833,0.76894146,0.00005132767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.50574744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71837825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49425256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009234116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99432665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031267729","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.24.1.207","title":"Mandatory Family Mediation and the Settlement Mission: A Feminist Critique","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Settlement (finance); Family mediation; Alternative dispute resolution; Dispute resolution; Party-directed mediation; Lawyer supported mediation; Transformative mediation; Family law; Economic Justice; Political science; Power (physics); Law; Dispute mechanism; Criminology; Sociology; Gender studies; Business","score_opus":0.03219285432878593,"score_gpt":0.28928956723856775,"score_spread":0.2570967129097818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031267729","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27345905,0.016224422,0.010833138,0.1409641,0.0007539936,0.000058636826,0.000044887125,0.000029793648,0.55763197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98178035,0.0013307278,0.00039902213,0.001639701,0.00009666632,0.000025033638,0.000003714862,0.0000064254427,0.014718335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99510777,0.0031945917,0.00006445051,0.00025015665,0.0004662052,0.0009168965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973852,0.0017205811,0.00027376178,0.0001315775,0.00025529962,0.00023349565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054259216,0.00033137307,0.0002869471,0.0011666751,0.014595849,0.0054307715,0.0015044966,0.0038881262,0.004082754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055346424,0.00022080544,0.00027148754,0.00083065825,0.039383397,0.0040562293,0.004630362,0.0037678971,0.00021986155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001126332,0.000012644671,0.0006405961,0.000034971607,0.000002416032,0.00030393363,0.09147688,0.000173514,0.000061666804,0.89989054,0.0022348203,0.0051568123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005585109,0.00007766226,0.006136544,0.0012443264,0.000021012702,0.00059569156,0.31288713,0.0010810487,0.0004836181,0.32722986,0.3501505,0.00003668359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09420882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11852487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09420882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015735691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018917028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18732095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031972923","doi":"10.1353/jwl.2006.0011","title":"Troubling the Definition of Pornography: Little Sisters, a New Defining Moment in Feminists' Engagement with the Law?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pornography; Feminism; Lesbian; Supreme court; Harm; Economic Justice; Law; Identity (music); Sociology; Sexual orientation; Appeal; Political science; Gender studies; Aesthetics; Art","score_opus":0.04530703119893826,"score_gpt":0.2694244258199427,"score_spread":0.22411739462100444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031972923","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13836223,0.04575352,0.00828393,0.46103284,0.0025051362,0.0000326789,0.000037648606,0.000045576322,0.34394652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90470684,0.007894119,0.0015727743,0.036010187,0.0009816195,0.00004668922,0.00001732996,0.00007661381,0.048693806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99412364,0.0037420278,0.00010661645,0.000469297,0.0010857133,0.00047269295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99606234,0.002506023,0.0004936469,0.00025607756,0.00034737415,0.00033453386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054432335,0.00031871584,0.00048541554,0.0010084737,0.009906221,0.011832741,0.0012000861,0.0042754854,0.0031147315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009946872,0.00033622584,0.00021115609,0.0010073944,0.06519851,0.014275624,0.008402244,0.006919168,0.00032978185],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009549442,0.000010482531,0.00064957974,0.000044542747,0.0000017675292,0.00013411588,0.13869886,0.000019904151,0.00014754801,0.8428629,0.007860606,0.009560186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011643808,0.000030226089,0.0013456552,0.0005588599,0.000005253183,0.0004227711,0.2856322,0.00009947986,0.0004583739,0.2012304,0.51017606,0.000029127168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017570999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029645268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017570999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008407832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006054985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061003387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031981910","doi":"10.1353/jwl.2006.0003","title":"Remembering Favourite Feminist Legal Scholarship","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Jurisprudence; Tribute; Empowerment; Feminism; Feminist legal theory; Sociology; Gender studies; Field (mathematics); Critical legal studies; Colonialism; Reproductive justice; Law; Political science; Legal realism; Legal research","score_opus":0.026304113795050342,"score_gpt":0.2712639225398518,"score_spread":0.24495980874480147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031981910","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030082166,0.086715646,0.0012132435,0.81180894,0.03342737,0.000008038363,0.000069012196,0.00006274207,0.06368673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21744242,0.13915086,0.004232846,0.3402609,0.12674944,0.00008863837,0.00013835508,0.00052893773,0.17140765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854584,0.0063675195,0.00043478337,0.0013385242,0.004394753,0.002006055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97873425,0.013956826,0.00083671225,0.0011798397,0.0029365185,0.0023558557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010939294,0.0007525241,0.000833627,0.0040384955,0.017582655,0.019642342,0.002212681,0.007008569,0.0065407893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01628519,0.00043060514,0.00051601866,0.003922313,0.05837309,0.011273007,0.0061447364,0.013085173,0.00149008],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028486067,0.000025594405,0.00040683118,0.00031725437,0.000012011116,0.00029100268,0.046519056,0.00008467797,0.00021050803,0.49306154,0.42652345,0.03251954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000232742,0.0000038960634,0.00008303199,0.00027115876,0.0000016561111,0.00007231903,0.0069879065,0.000015843852,0.000058441765,0.015362899,0.9771338,0.0000065797976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06272429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17263752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9372757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023424307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0140785705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16995603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032220794","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.21.2.315","title":"Producing Paternity: The Role of Legal Fatherhood in Maintaining the Traditional Family","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Openness to experience; Family law; Legislature; Sociology; Law; Ideology; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.030739199553426938,"score_gpt":0.24720511852374913,"score_spread":0.2164659189703222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032220794","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10540204,0.021279998,0.04571267,0.09690492,0.0010325221,0.00006257547,0.00006421649,0.00008012514,0.7294609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9590183,0.006709615,0.005312824,0.0048468895,0.00023055461,0.0000238272,0.000018441842,0.000032696484,0.023806758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952827,0.0016665827,0.00010092085,0.0004733452,0.0016210281,0.0008553683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99750096,0.0012587791,0.00027287443,0.0002369524,0.0004917471,0.00023872407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006870692,0.0002356282,0.00033996752,0.0010169375,0.012538903,0.006005184,0.0016222904,0.0025498657,0.0022584212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008066667,0.00024194708,0.00022546963,0.0008499528,0.06759127,0.005142294,0.004212917,0.0036833126,0.00023486739],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034869076,0.0000026936716,0.0006235551,0.000017423501,0.0000012384977,0.00017789472,0.021740925,0.00006766658,0.00008745513,0.96709734,0.00126007,0.008920301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013015031,0.00004257834,0.007763438,0.0008716813,0.000024757097,0.0013379343,0.040565122,0.00063312496,0.00076207315,0.42474917,0.52316403,0.000073118455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39418143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5313426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60581857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01764185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028651183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7837741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032270569","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.26.2.01","title":"Does the System of Judicial Appointment Matter? Exploring Women’s Representation on Ontario’s Courts","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Diversity (politics); Government (linguistics); Political science; Public administration; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04306756853649768,"score_gpt":0.2633196467962379,"score_spread":0.22025207825974025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032270569","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96620286,0.0005589945,0.00027201077,0.003265763,0.000038213308,0.00006127488,0.006369334,0.000008639448,0.023222914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98966753,0.00035580606,0.00014609606,0.00017875242,0.000019510615,0.00003305998,0.0021347406,0.000008180795,0.0074562905],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950871,0.0006041107,0.00018429292,0.00039580255,0.0018994953,0.0018290941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878731,0.0015464681,0.005074379,0.00045740767,0.0033623332,0.0016862695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002771063,0.00017734815,0.0004266434,0.0037044922,0.004469992,0.0025971048,0.0013995884,0.00057800685,0.0050297263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012355578,0.00027300496,0.00032604078,0.010756163,0.0019842405,0.000996115,0.0021643343,0.0008076879,0.0005165583],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016028094,0.000046925274,0.9120218,0.00009202114,0.000066219814,0.00024663247,0.047068074,0.00028625995,0.00048134723,0.0050301864,0.014455498,0.020044765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008536311,0.000017491051,0.96002847,0.00007127313,0.000014902959,0.000033728422,0.018457336,0.00023496828,0.000101311816,0.00021722373,0.020799447,0.000015257916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9746755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99125576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040406518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040406518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02962968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29317117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033790983","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.23.2.600","title":"When Bare Breasts Are a “Threat”: The Production of Bodies/Spaces in Law","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Ethnology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.07547992627095017,"score_gpt":0.27399853034489546,"score_spread":0.19851860407394528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033790983","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17403054,0.0053180666,0.017147288,0.06739543,0.0008226687,0.000058020716,0.00006007708,0.000121948404,0.7350459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96094966,0.00084605016,0.0011913102,0.0021659452,0.00018033737,0.000032478732,0.00001398802,0.00008521924,0.034534946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921307,0.0050412086,0.0001185992,0.000602061,0.0012249046,0.0008824599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994892,0.0028856357,0.0005634372,0.00045151034,0.00054388685,0.00066351146],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054573384,0.00042750489,0.00034408164,0.0014374946,0.012198591,0.012962233,0.0012967434,0.004431867,0.010126712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011095439,0.0005470917,0.00038644305,0.00092311285,0.067188784,0.009381873,0.010416874,0.0052975407,0.0011931077],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001614334,0.000014054257,0.0009256077,0.000036646936,0.0000031410168,0.00049244997,0.23547176,0.0000679835,0.00052919355,0.7486364,0.0045018187,0.0093048895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018384357,0.00006795427,0.0031306609,0.00042602821,0.000015571295,0.00079176715,0.30212194,0.00037996215,0.0010795533,0.345394,0.34651,0.00006417168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010279012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010579205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98780143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047516334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004036697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034475684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034081025","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.25.2.249","title":"Women as Patients, Not Spare Parts: Examining the Relationship between the Physician and Women Egg Providers","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Secrecy; Donation; Egg donation; Family medicine; Spare part; Medical care; Medicine; Medical record; Business; Law; Gynecology; Political science; Surgery","score_opus":0.05944436368892934,"score_gpt":0.2665356390372726,"score_spread":0.2070912753483433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034081025","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6951708,0.0058241882,0.00067693397,0.23071383,0.0005174321,0.000080993974,0.00006605236,0.000015092761,0.06693463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9691023,0.0034097028,0.0003304586,0.020428188,0.00012268114,0.00002387226,0.000015094315,0.000013606494,0.0065539787],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903385,0.0053175525,0.0001461151,0.0003031409,0.0016049235,0.0022897196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9843954,0.008494321,0.0024068882,0.00021456779,0.0015970092,0.0028917964],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062273066,0.00017453269,0.0002984685,0.0010641027,0.025186906,0.0060605886,0.0013516047,0.0030545506,0.003503317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024249867,0.00043905515,0.00019049158,0.0015594749,0.016665814,0.0035795951,0.0046718763,0.005254857,0.00022830152],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003137365,0.000053465217,0.027481247,0.00005916937,0.0000072193734,0.0017077823,0.9263521,0.000037475966,0.00013753146,0.019677883,0.014441345,0.010013421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006862213,0.000020087698,0.008751229,0.00019405685,0.000007745961,0.0005978606,0.95477116,0.000050844348,0.000048524715,0.0010817936,0.034456134,0.000013704957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.74783677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8844425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9748131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037751798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07727003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5072965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036720829","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.25.1.111","title":"Disability and Care: Still Not “Getting It”","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Ethnology; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03274786859055405,"score_gpt":0.26834873718814833,"score_spread":0.23560086859759427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036720829","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038901812,0.03405592,0.0013347417,0.9083337,0.005073545,0.000015085509,0.000041454008,0.000018868437,0.047236595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40116388,0.06897168,0.0025684147,0.4821596,0.0126802875,0.00017336839,0.00013189914,0.00012000796,0.03203085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98006266,0.009787367,0.0007270822,0.0014784276,0.004520896,0.0034235625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98463386,0.008977905,0.00062696566,0.00087691046,0.002654773,0.002229664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013847321,0.0006218834,0.00108246,0.00187773,0.011610466,0.013400935,0.0029465926,0.014045101,0.008646274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026214164,0.00031310378,0.000925105,0.002078451,0.045603488,0.018066637,0.01183195,0.02040997,0.00097368564],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021733986,0.00003296882,0.0011616907,0.00050065934,0.00002634102,0.00021061416,0.025494246,0.00016378699,0.00007955376,0.76533276,0.12686364,0.08011209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020239435,0.000051890733,0.0021672803,0.0034862738,0.000024965497,0.00031572607,0.05760719,0.00013330158,0.0001221563,0.27266607,0.6633435,0.000061479375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08072206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13957392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08072206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020635288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03086115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1605044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039156858","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.26.2.06","title":"Just Horseplay? Masculinity and Workplace Grievances in Fordist Canada, 1947–70s","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Historical Gender and Feminism Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Masculinity; Fordism; Arbitration; Intimidation; Ideology; Sociology; Grievance; Gender studies; Criminology; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.023414335669776583,"score_gpt":0.2518510504743607,"score_spread":0.2284367148045841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039156858","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92169017,0.006483777,0.00022197662,0.02263968,0.00029551995,0.000026037109,0.00019897893,0.000013513337,0.04843041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9778512,0.0021061772,0.000092126866,0.0013646883,0.000042855845,0.000008900467,0.00004058586,0.000011888659,0.018481506],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99733377,0.0003666215,0.000043078773,0.00023086889,0.00072148896,0.0013042381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971643,0.00054233277,0.00028986728,0.00006793781,0.00087989814,0.0010557518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023951808,0.00032392188,0.00041571268,0.0019574268,0.049582843,0.005547549,0.0016111885,0.0022674277,0.0040975953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003836511,0.0004512702,0.00021245745,0.0026860228,0.01984418,0.0018304451,0.0031729771,0.0040754685,0.000252952],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004125002,0.000059026534,0.02220328,0.000041609124,0.000009256304,0.0007976204,0.9161761,0.00007854619,0.00032334976,0.03532745,0.008536731,0.016405834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063558705,0.00004460211,0.09911697,0.00022428604,0.000007791535,0.000274113,0.67564315,0.000085208,0.00034920956,0.0016087878,0.22257535,0.00006421541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9932526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.120379694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.120379694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07901889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8734199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044505823","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.27.1.94","title":"Surrogates in Quebec: The Good, the Bad, and the Foreigner","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Law; Order (exchange); Political science; Portrait; Sociology; Psychology; History; Business","score_opus":0.030423776065012863,"score_gpt":0.2604823510179169,"score_spread":0.23005857495290402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044505823","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32959178,0.049660064,0.003067053,0.24156229,0.0014321848,0.00011403535,0.0003361096,0.000060847622,0.37417564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9246144,0.008499563,0.00069701386,0.014050363,0.00009770102,0.000032647127,0.0000741387,0.000020452311,0.05191377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996754,0.001602004,0.00005989595,0.00022095545,0.00064751663,0.00071567076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982023,0.000767028,0.00015917444,0.00009526646,0.00041142848,0.00036472033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036668063,0.00022970591,0.00032959733,0.000637409,0.019922396,0.006083167,0.0009394085,0.0033867417,0.004953243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049811136,0.00019611082,0.00025993923,0.0014600258,0.012883501,0.0015972812,0.0028204112,0.0034248647,0.00019330936],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000763032,0.000050522925,0.014934346,0.00017832658,0.000020402149,0.005006421,0.12514596,0.00046204997,0.0008205855,0.6999473,0.081237085,0.07212075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030372245,0.00005976149,0.02433807,0.0010633174,0.0000459499,0.0022408615,0.11074085,0.0006345239,0.0006812975,0.02150572,0.8385408,0.000118431955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97562635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9882488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058421366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.058421366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.054054968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42387867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045288846","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.23.2.686","title":"Beyond Country of Origin: <i>Smith v. Canada</i> and Refugees from Unexpected Places","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Country; Geography; Economic geography; Ethnology; Political science; History; Archaeology; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.01452583233195732,"score_gpt":0.23023262731416105,"score_spread":0.21570679498220374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045288846","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.092230365,0.0075722737,0.00068189565,0.44417027,0.0016780072,0.00007242239,0.0003348327,0.000041683703,0.45321822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6982129,0.004266966,0.0003808842,0.20109661,0.0004608393,0.000045623925,0.00011993291,0.00007107192,0.09534514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99572146,0.00029157614,0.00006327421,0.00021346922,0.0008064039,0.0029037686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972703,0.00044313775,0.00014121363,0.000073292686,0.0007415221,0.00133057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017044435,0.0004478827,0.00045528403,0.0011333099,0.048329316,0.0101795355,0.0026506204,0.012471294,0.008095269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004040433,0.00042137443,0.0008533945,0.0012744482,0.01270337,0.003461745,0.005356864,0.012520253,0.0005097543],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060085782,0.00006588492,0.016678372,0.00014758951,0.000058337522,0.007768114,0.07247266,0.00036156,0.0006744686,0.5093087,0.36964,0.022764217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060782662,0.000037732716,0.020511495,0.0010887332,0.00011870414,0.0021217004,0.13218729,0.00033928338,0.00077806704,0.03247734,0.8100172,0.00026161416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9824446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9950559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06237858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06237858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15313381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4525904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045801057","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.25.1.056","title":"The Supreme Court, Ameliorative Programs, and Disability: Not Getting It","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Supreme court; Humanities; Ethnology; Philosophy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.04075763082411048,"score_gpt":0.2789339670349551,"score_spread":0.2381763362108446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045801057","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08083376,0.021380492,0.0022627865,0.4486899,0.0016804805,0.00006976237,0.0002616119,0.000070133996,0.44475096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83469033,0.007644161,0.0009892158,0.0810916,0.000558503,0.00007547359,0.00010347931,0.000059085698,0.07478817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871313,0.0025398184,0.00019383385,0.00076710974,0.004329418,0.0050385757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991823,0.0027530792,0.0004041779,0.00042520184,0.0024465548,0.0021480727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058713835,0.00033216382,0.0006101406,0.0013440704,0.021147039,0.01166666,0.0021139304,0.008919469,0.007264538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017761955,0.00028556885,0.00045595047,0.001973531,0.031775277,0.004484949,0.006443061,0.009406314,0.00040231165],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025483967,0.000027305257,0.003069884,0.00007094465,0.00001529606,0.00017469523,0.010579804,0.00024350072,0.00013151336,0.907679,0.05275209,0.025230415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012275124,0.00007897198,0.020275539,0.0018166291,0.00014068572,0.0002227627,0.036526322,0.00063984294,0.0006310156,0.18196961,0.7574265,0.00014940725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93293726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97274595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.067062736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06250137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16744839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45348132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046394459","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.24.2.389","title":"Why Feminist Legal Scholars Should Write Judgments: Reflections on the Feminist Judgments Project in England and Wales","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Humanities; Redaction; Philosophy; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.07849090665921987,"score_gpt":0.32225329954721565,"score_spread":0.24376239288799578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046394459","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5885944,0.0056094364,0.0022509673,0.2574554,0.0014873566,0.00022090258,0.00005867834,0.000042104988,0.14428072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9433752,0.0009771727,0.00035991057,0.018014908,0.0001453409,0.0001409153,0.000010916485,0.00005755198,0.036918197],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9192319,0.05689696,0.0018240154,0.0033955898,0.006668425,0.011983121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88974893,0.086552046,0.003531193,0.0025684978,0.008456806,0.009142619],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.056020636,0.00041174938,0.0010018708,0.0016688274,0.056654796,0.025118198,0.0032410396,0.010130885,0.008675518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07832848,0.0012768041,0.0004184649,0.0027224491,0.06120761,0.0105227595,0.018799853,0.018989092,0.0010396334],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022842522,0.000024154251,0.0009583497,0.00007255891,0.0000031302088,0.0005244589,0.93932086,0.000031252468,0.00014908113,0.05093132,0.0042306054,0.0037314028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013012045,0.000023734614,0.00171661,0.00020183985,0.0000045265915,0.000060189468,0.90819556,0.000041266667,0.00015460125,0.0071353572,0.08242273,0.000030504052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30498147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.413261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30498147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044871185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.054597408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60641253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049476288","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.26.1.51","title":"“It Happened More Than Once”: Freezing Deaths in Saskatchewan","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Scrutiny; Devaluation; Wright; Criminology; Law; Sociology; Harm; Legitimacy; History; Racism; Political science; Politics; Currency; Economics","score_opus":0.034234401763553295,"score_gpt":0.3272456883309905,"score_spread":0.2930112865674372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049476288","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.889118,0.0065208757,0.00042864308,0.032669026,0.0004994089,0.00020069779,0.0008182486,0.000024734003,0.06972037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93794966,0.010115471,0.00046367262,0.01502889,0.000070283546,0.0001420773,0.00042931584,0.000036782298,0.03576382],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846065,0.00037082768,0.000064124164,0.00014122749,0.0002431648,0.0007200161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99779,0.00061710697,0.0001756873,0.000104737934,0.0006966755,0.0006157998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015528441,0.00048403424,0.00037902594,0.001902513,0.031763952,0.005256724,0.0022261697,0.0020103124,0.0045778477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030746432,0.00045987807,0.00032856484,0.00447478,0.010723846,0.0026576612,0.0071098097,0.005320337,0.00037983365],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014045283,0.00010019673,0.08572657,0.00053633115,0.00008972588,0.009947376,0.7591619,0.00068465085,0.0021914428,0.034511827,0.041976165,0.0649335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008459918,0.000029738554,0.067903966,0.00054412667,0.000030884126,0.00052838755,0.8595198,0.00009821528,0.00029185077,0.002260943,0.06868959,0.00009409362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9871321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99753606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07742926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07742926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.114578985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5617912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050061770","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.26.1.81","title":"Legal Feminism and the Post-Racism Fantasy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Scholarship; Oppression; Feminism; Colonialism; Sociology; Gender studies; White (mutation); Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.020533839274851275,"score_gpt":0.29110096470236874,"score_spread":0.2705671254275175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050061770","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07973339,0.013707854,0.0030141363,0.34885308,0.0011291296,0.000025132118,0.00004634249,0.000050114875,0.55344087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9216219,0.0025368659,0.00075477286,0.012362337,0.00026439593,0.000024572886,0.000012988319,0.000039720875,0.06238242],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927817,0.0035131432,0.00008811559,0.00045413486,0.0017403009,0.00142261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99591184,0.0023527858,0.00035925672,0.00016963192,0.00065335503,0.0005531684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00646101,0.00040638572,0.00029046866,0.0017294621,0.02824776,0.010968249,0.0013047439,0.004641978,0.005400737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076926327,0.0002733008,0.0002477239,0.0010451449,0.09383165,0.005750598,0.0048374515,0.0060201795,0.00048729684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069279,0.000012424742,0.00042335066,0.000020431342,0.0000014324862,0.00031749078,0.14379208,0.000035207817,0.00011940311,0.8398705,0.008706501,0.006694313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000132581745,0.000022901955,0.0018537357,0.00027763587,0.000004138117,0.00066022103,0.16313411,0.00015420736,0.0003341776,0.16445896,0.66905564,0.00003100349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28580305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35716107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28580305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028246224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017854465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56827897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052970927","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.25.2.202","title":"Rhetoric and Reality: “Protecting” Women in Canadian Public Policy on Assisted Human Reproduction","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Reproduction; Reproductive technology; Agency (philosophy); Royal Commission; Rhetoric; Commission; Government (linguistics); Reproductive health; Human reproduction; Public administration; Rhetorical question; Bioethics; Welfare; Political science; Sociology; Law; Social science; Medicine; Biology; Population","score_opus":0.055187360343866745,"score_gpt":0.2990699769808534,"score_spread":0.24388261663698668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052970927","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026301844,0.02243816,0.0028718028,0.61766225,0.002272835,0.0000743489,0.00013015443,0.0000631006,0.32818553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8294881,0.010636392,0.0020565265,0.12387755,0.00076052203,0.00009451681,0.00006866886,0.0000905888,0.032927167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9706989,0.0101307025,0.0004905507,0.001994627,0.010665885,0.0060193418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98306435,0.010397734,0.0009043828,0.00036640238,0.0038322252,0.0014348578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025870774,0.0011690753,0.0008901245,0.0050424896,0.06738222,0.023752475,0.0048634512,0.015004793,0.004794728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03286135,0.0008119653,0.00087158615,0.0071620387,0.09178031,0.008604127,0.008168304,0.014748085,0.00042829843],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002218452,0.000012089949,0.0005585345,0.00012983795,0.000009306401,0.0002872757,0.16497485,0.00018594935,0.00016669791,0.7915158,0.03290736,0.009230108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003637603,0.000025293966,0.0030598086,0.0010587518,0.000052661027,0.00015939072,0.104787864,0.0005517684,0.00037500807,0.08045156,0.80928594,0.00015561665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9800831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97590476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7240155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.27598453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25397187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8397553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053005249","doi":"10.1353/jwl.2006.0010","title":"Sommes-nous dignes? L'egalite et l'arret Gosselin","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.022476020866127527,"score_gpt":0.2790292047019215,"score_spread":0.25655318383579395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053005249","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07929291,0.009827752,0.0012413358,0.37077692,0.0015088782,0.000035748708,0.000105917505,0.000059484468,0.53715104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7023827,0.0021291403,0.00045713555,0.06273448,0.00021549531,0.00003128194,0.000024138,0.00006297029,0.2319626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966363,0.00075035467,0.000033177526,0.00026311155,0.00076036435,0.0015566841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900204,0.00028224682,0.000081574886,0.000049680413,0.0003060446,0.00027840975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020478482,0.0002790148,0.00029533755,0.00048273167,0.016277172,0.0063182344,0.0010550935,0.0040277066,0.006382954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040061623,0.00018417613,0.00022621016,0.00061962754,0.016177133,0.0024033675,0.0029202325,0.004330725,0.00057199324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003311957,0.000013823959,0.0018546408,0.000030720817,0.000006515979,0.0005620311,0.029138993,0.00008854892,0.00021680332,0.86386585,0.09099644,0.013192569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014486066,0.000014858556,0.0048139864,0.00022089214,0.000012913155,0.00014126826,0.030500242,0.000102800135,0.0004190629,0.038366225,0.92534924,0.00004411965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8379418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9233489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16205817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031077655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032053433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32602507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054377323","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.25.2.284","title":"Of Surrogate Mother Born: Parentage Determinations in Canada and Elsewhere","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Certainty; Citizenship; Statutory law; Law; Political science; Best interests; Parental consent; Sociology; Informed consent; Medicine","score_opus":0.016592400537643482,"score_gpt":0.23713762352001166,"score_spread":0.22054522298236817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054377323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5839274,0.01735165,0.0043723877,0.075752,0.0010825071,0.00028474076,0.00081790896,0.00010878093,0.31630272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91481644,0.006154187,0.002465771,0.018111615,0.00006571227,0.000078575766,0.00021619188,0.000045775178,0.058045678],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99256414,0.0011237933,0.00026674438,0.0008482364,0.0026148045,0.0025823384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911082,0.0028227943,0.00079361297,0.0004330937,0.0031829143,0.001659382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068622567,0.00025104912,0.0004691703,0.0012902189,0.02046604,0.0045634573,0.0022377796,0.004570322,0.0036064482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01768572,0.00043685985,0.00041512144,0.002067852,0.006084696,0.0012091289,0.003303832,0.004596771,0.00020494689],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020305536,0.00011992046,0.08355703,0.0003061178,0.000057517394,0.0130216675,0.10917183,0.00085862534,0.0022568626,0.59431845,0.06012062,0.1360083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008980795,0.00016372824,0.115554884,0.0015140842,0.00016844709,0.005409879,0.07549236,0.0013426834,0.004002387,0.013156523,0.782756,0.00034922926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9856963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9932568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06773428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06773428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17592373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49144888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057559751","doi":"10.1353/jwl.2006.0007","title":"What Work of Feminist Legal Scholarship Over the Past Twenty Years Has Been Influential or Important to You, and Why?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Work (physics); Sociology; Political science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.023919845937612216,"score_gpt":0.25092780256722474,"score_spread":0.22700795662961254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057559751","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026555855,0.14381321,0.0010670768,0.6895259,0.008192231,0.000010710645,0.00007245904,0.00003933343,0.13072318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64684397,0.09008532,0.0013576829,0.10724772,0.008843415,0.00007706783,0.0000959853,0.00013301213,0.14531584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932326,0.003977244,0.0001419525,0.0005273566,0.0011373406,0.0009835337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891495,0.0064700553,0.00080530084,0.00053230155,0.0015084819,0.0015344159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009603741,0.00036693728,0.00044456127,0.0020744365,0.016251445,0.016287304,0.001249601,0.004160128,0.0076855673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0107357595,0.00024075624,0.00021527964,0.0026478511,0.041376594,0.008509098,0.005226347,0.005075039,0.0013382873],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042294483,0.000033281136,0.0030584703,0.00049384515,0.000020969039,0.00043970605,0.21239297,0.0000864938,0.00035823032,0.5684078,0.13129872,0.0833673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002522183,0.000009166704,0.0010398516,0.001131024,0.0000035352352,0.00010219982,0.07449199,0.000029946079,0.00017191956,0.017174013,0.9058308,0.000013085269],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041861273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09765183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9581387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02285477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01566737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1658237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058201937","doi":"10.1353/jwl.2006.0012","title":"Progres ou recul: reflexions sur l'accessibilite a la justice pour les victimes de harcelement sexuel au travail au Quebec","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.049266322214280026,"score_gpt":0.3299897541469109,"score_spread":0.2807234319326309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058201937","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20356944,0.02459844,0.001054019,0.42591685,0.0030488784,0.00013303394,0.0008104513,0.00007401765,0.34079483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8378871,0.010499544,0.00033670216,0.037433658,0.0005693834,0.000097898104,0.00012639366,0.000046042423,0.113003366],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962141,0.00090444274,0.00010182233,0.000325,0.0011817473,0.0012728573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98543984,0.0045404206,0.0008378705,0.00039482032,0.006810141,0.0019768644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005993315,0.00037483725,0.0004155895,0.0022066652,0.014151143,0.009535965,0.0023570098,0.0029037434,0.015919885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018145854,0.0002642643,0.0002767937,0.0021450652,0.014815173,0.003544938,0.0036179998,0.0042611896,0.0008603398],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009591876,0.00009704248,0.030269997,0.0008886043,0.000042072264,0.0013970693,0.40019727,0.00023842345,0.00067896076,0.21665119,0.27255318,0.07689028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018032353,0.00004680887,0.04896633,0.0020323435,0.000076521486,0.0002306912,0.46834618,0.00016953492,0.00043021177,0.009089129,0.47050288,0.000091325535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95344764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97186434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04655236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0373482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07270671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27098137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060088122","doi":"10.1353/jwl.2006.0018","title":"Causation, Common Sense, and the Common Law: Replacing Unexamined Assumptions with What We Know about Male Violence against Women or from Jane Doe to Bonnie Mooney","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Common sense; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Criminology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.02346392379539503,"score_gpt":0.2650374439093258,"score_spread":0.2415735201139308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060088122","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07515678,0.052463334,0.13087969,0.59469366,0.0026792353,0.000074148425,0.00009811246,0.0001069527,0.14384808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9620982,0.008431461,0.0074979775,0.016523017,0.0017680719,0.000103620754,0.000026097709,0.000041985517,0.0035095674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97468513,0.016636675,0.000780866,0.0025126743,0.003708834,0.0016757936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94176817,0.04847327,0.0028961934,0.0037688024,0.0022054454,0.0008880782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0313058,0.00066477695,0.0013108467,0.0043447637,0.009068307,0.011174332,0.0036662053,0.007820812,0.002112205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038538743,0.00065503956,0.0010166352,0.002445539,0.16761813,0.029037753,0.008951198,0.012104536,0.0002089072],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003084366,0.000004157829,0.0001330695,0.00001651543,0.000003544079,0.00005673994,0.0024944062,0.0001251752,0.000013023518,0.9949818,0.00060584047,0.0015627624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042784,0.000005864791,0.00014904678,0.00012538412,0.0000041791477,0.00004416163,0.0018450927,0.00031586082,0.000051908428,0.9857379,0.01170578,0.00001043683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022042453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014391206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0313058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013776304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009279527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16556293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061392756","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.22.1.157","title":"Who Stands to Lose from Tax Cuts in Israel?","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.018046450697427115,"score_gpt":0.2494081363275807,"score_spread":0.23136168563015358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061392756","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6820717,0.0060814526,0.0002957702,0.14083162,0.0010094241,0.00004126106,0.0010747565,0.00002135384,0.1685726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9504415,0.0024935678,0.00005263663,0.01186036,0.00038456568,0.000029819925,0.00047202187,0.000015721853,0.03424976],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990727,0.00015193904,0.000015247545,0.000043213186,0.00010912565,0.0006077694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992042,0.00011040021,0.00016067088,0.000017147757,0.00013722164,0.00037036772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010903816,0.00014362684,0.00035156394,0.0006992919,0.002701216,0.0034592012,0.00070519454,0.0017017584,0.02347159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023660148,0.00013287865,0.00018599896,0.0008030326,0.001496003,0.0020318155,0.0017058639,0.0027578322,0.001284781],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00082389225,0.0007694659,0.35805428,0.0002564392,0.00014803249,0.0019832575,0.01402335,0.0007954214,0.00044140592,0.15526274,0.25170985,0.21573187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018311616,0.00028754034,0.34180418,0.001206089,0.00008154571,0.0010035244,0.19067878,0.0016018071,0.00073217205,0.05816394,0.4041567,0.0001005879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0504831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.095671244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0504831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028735416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030818998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10037851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061958160","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.24.2.275","title":"Sexual Harassment: A Feminist Phrase That Transformed the Workplace","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harassment; Sociology; Humanities; Ethnology; Political science; Art; Law","score_opus":0.05091291529289937,"score_gpt":0.296504657829192,"score_spread":0.24559174253629262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061958160","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2273218,0.023872677,0.01433424,0.16989015,0.0053189965,0.0000592828,0.00015554808,0.00009684192,0.5589505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9552225,0.0034265926,0.00067976915,0.0056495853,0.0008331561,0.00003863597,0.00001791649,0.000049823593,0.034082055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962877,0.0022729374,0.00008363108,0.00032183627,0.00046352463,0.0005703958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977035,0.0013583524,0.00025489661,0.00021800032,0.000219968,0.00024542105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027411974,0.0003770248,0.00027575484,0.0012053003,0.011645012,0.007302363,0.0007176077,0.0028546469,0.0048712296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00462996,0.00018539326,0.00026304263,0.001126766,0.039146893,0.004179544,0.0056361896,0.0049722213,0.00041854187],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028939301,0.000024075089,0.0011416978,0.00006873984,0.0000034836937,0.00046052845,0.32290748,0.000065925014,0.00035938254,0.6543527,0.0076105995,0.012976425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013086813,0.000057962912,0.0022507512,0.00050722016,0.0000074337077,0.0006800703,0.2364667,0.00009567895,0.00059995276,0.05238033,0.70690614,0.000034561297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020249348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02869944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97975063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059856754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039202473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043429315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063902451","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.22.2.463","title":"Universally Particular: The Garneau Sisterhood's Challenge to the Rape Script","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Gender, Feminism, and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02985485712416939,"score_gpt":0.2489525848724144,"score_spread":0.219097727748245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063902451","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.092573084,0.017952012,0.0022097502,0.2191079,0.004525081,0.000049779497,0.00009298997,0.00007308576,0.6634163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74916977,0.0034822419,0.00084287045,0.02737491,0.0006769136,0.000051689964,0.000034971177,0.00008424345,0.21828239],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969694,0.002081722,0.00006089412,0.0002583959,0.00028782827,0.00034175304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807537,0.0012897184,0.00010548834,0.00010034293,0.0001292756,0.0002997327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002934292,0.0002923699,0.00031922522,0.00035166935,0.010715845,0.005242215,0.0010142815,0.004408692,0.0063355407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005501656,0.00025331668,0.00018171969,0.0003957289,0.013346688,0.0028193265,0.0037528828,0.00676093,0.0009812373],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030721603,0.000013894299,0.0005711742,0.00007251695,0.0000037115738,0.000644259,0.20408092,0.00005820592,0.0003251612,0.7196046,0.06165555,0.012939275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001279352,0.000033753462,0.0016992132,0.0005238027,0.0000058638393,0.00050577865,0.08479496,0.00018240583,0.00047177708,0.049431078,0.86231315,0.00002546213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048031382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07919278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9519686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061198426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043036686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09550363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064373349","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.27.1.22","title":"Nouvelles normativités de la famille : la garde partagée au Québec, en France et en Belgique","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Social Policies and Family","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.018427221066733425,"score_gpt":0.27052095486556593,"score_spread":0.2520937337988325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064373349","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9198162,0.0037722941,0.0021382172,0.010743673,0.00008836636,0.000048503636,0.0003916797,0.000036671594,0.062964305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99243766,0.00043010345,0.0002568277,0.00022169852,0.0000052546266,0.00001415468,0.000050311166,0.000009083988,0.006574978],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960304,0.00144889,0.00008491699,0.0004102055,0.00093690306,0.001088696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951165,0.0011612944,0.00065512996,0.00020419434,0.0019379101,0.0009250041],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037290337,0.00023355879,0.00040647894,0.0019094015,0.013281259,0.006225515,0.00092738494,0.0007513826,0.0054394556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057883714,0.00020828228,0.00019657324,0.0033691768,0.01025568,0.00163245,0.002316198,0.0014735803,0.00020454181],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015434192,0.000052931882,0.13154098,0.00023146851,0.00006637739,0.0006512167,0.6690567,0.0008096106,0.0011345951,0.13004127,0.00913812,0.057122443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012352863,0.000043698416,0.41926438,0.00037931313,0.000038900587,0.00015135804,0.46197802,0.0004506984,0.00034612743,0.0022222034,0.11503734,0.00007557238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9743173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9830567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058375973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.058375973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046360504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4235493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065169972","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.22.1.169","title":"A Feminist Perspective on Carbon Taxes","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.042909415949248984,"score_gpt":0.24201688133912097,"score_spread":0.19910746538987198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065169972","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030911114,0.01502273,0.009112198,0.10407973,0.00050529384,0.000029775612,0.00029790707,0.000022292143,0.8400189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83962494,0.012645619,0.0020039687,0.0121638235,0.0006888574,0.00009045228,0.000060545262,0.000051836818,0.13267007],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850863,0.00059659244,0.000024800998,0.0001689623,0.00037203112,0.00032907553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991671,0.0005159428,0.00008716393,0.000045573408,0.00013576623,0.000048499736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001107941,0.0003567218,0.000227214,0.0010890819,0.0031899088,0.0028463723,0.0005304347,0.0024449553,0.010679179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022082815,0.00014356757,0.00029654516,0.0010484384,0.0070782085,0.002497298,0.001440469,0.002386233,0.0005271047],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061132414,0.0000056597364,0.00032251317,0.000024303406,0.0000023787952,0.00006583419,0.0013371612,0.00029925405,0.00008235807,0.99135077,0.0021480871,0.0043556388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009698692,0.00003105198,0.0028172822,0.0004411891,0.000010340245,0.00020759967,0.005592884,0.0006577602,0.0008103125,0.43190342,0.5574968,0.000021711065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018560087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0219807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9814399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066721924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029750424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048410356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066806600","doi":"10.1353/jwl.2006.0005","title":"Les femmes juges feront-elles veritablement une difference? Reflexions sur leur presence depuis vingt ans a la Cour supreme du Canada","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.03423380441760103,"score_gpt":0.2629472056405966,"score_spread":0.22871340122299555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066806600","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7892523,0.0053933356,0.0003736886,0.08615124,0.00044850158,0.000027985834,0.00031578756,0.000013407172,0.11802378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96776587,0.0017508746,0.00008629201,0.0047184257,0.000049301805,0.000007347892,0.00003810431,0.00000812466,0.025575796],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976299,0.00032425116,0.00002737708,0.00021436458,0.0005878086,0.0012162812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99668604,0.0007038319,0.00035485267,0.00006590079,0.0012128532,0.0009765007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019462096,0.00015049335,0.00027695973,0.0010308571,0.016923796,0.0046275277,0.0007105116,0.0011784267,0.0054573514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005795983,0.00017372295,0.00014611732,0.0017601757,0.007323666,0.0013448027,0.0013427999,0.0027325856,0.00027042528],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015430913,0.00006407973,0.19307537,0.00017117122,0.00006639906,0.0013080712,0.42972675,0.00022460904,0.0019454559,0.18095799,0.08510918,0.10719658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009960099,0.000040172516,0.26733187,0.00046279535,0.000052525316,0.00021112282,0.39808694,0.00019895508,0.00080042146,0.004490859,0.3282174,0.000097089505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9580296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.986813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041970372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027357755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033582307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19849533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070624944","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.23.2.548","title":"L'engagement de ne pas troubler l'ordre public dans les causes de violence conjugale ayant fait l'objet d'un abandon des poursuites judiciaires criminelles (art. 810 C.CR.)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminology; Criminal code; Political science; Order (exchange); Public defender; Criminal law; Sociology; Psychology; Criminal justice","score_opus":0.07840102207439557,"score_gpt":0.28250592573735256,"score_spread":0.20410490366295697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070624944","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31715485,0.046398405,0.0039270064,0.37883577,0.0024725029,0.00016422267,0.00007630071,0.00010442089,0.25086656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9403236,0.012591615,0.0007606759,0.016409224,0.0007055056,0.000051101,0.000024678095,0.000041324798,0.029092321],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927966,0.0029230863,0.000094150026,0.00034894896,0.0012733805,0.002563825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99296796,0.0023985084,0.0012656114,0.00031047486,0.0007263186,0.0023311656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054057646,0.00040175705,0.00036620916,0.0007301272,0.02370447,0.008724575,0.0014339179,0.0052066105,0.0070344745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012850161,0.0003977271,0.00034873505,0.0009840698,0.02693468,0.0033111665,0.0072213295,0.004921406,0.0006968613],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000537603,0.00021810706,0.04455307,0.0005401458,0.00004418273,0.0040617883,0.55028903,0.0002781922,0.001613723,0.17702632,0.050249305,0.17107238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021309868,0.00016916881,0.037963238,0.0010883436,0.00004892222,0.002089698,0.35796154,0.00010083186,0.00045385156,0.00915877,0.5908817,0.000062668616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39844805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57462704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60155195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013868363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0389497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79225767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072273330","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.24.1.082","title":"Discrimination systémique et intersectionnalité : la déqualification des immigrantes à Montréal","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Unemployment; Sociology; Demographic economics; Political science; Economics; Economic growth; Law","score_opus":0.08865915779065758,"score_gpt":0.34375687341624067,"score_spread":0.2550977156255831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072273330","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9056495,0.0031951051,0.0004029081,0.02205422,0.00015496029,0.000045909073,0.00017892566,0.00001898945,0.06829958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97946805,0.0014527063,0.00018997588,0.0008677567,0.000037022994,0.000023728,0.000057317728,0.0000067300793,0.017896751],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979074,0.00050654565,0.000046668134,0.0001118919,0.00046752038,0.00096007664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867696,0.0002499223,0.00025380452,0.000049921386,0.00031616076,0.00045315674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015636419,0.00036789826,0.0002921857,0.0013236413,0.011529345,0.0039528906,0.0010785101,0.0014157447,0.0053155725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040053576,0.00021191788,0.00035714338,0.0021195838,0.0067646103,0.0014174707,0.0040902486,0.0017732371,0.00017746317],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018520563,0.00023588115,0.27476978,0.00017020483,0.000053559215,0.0055110385,0.3450016,0.0006939097,0.0019637255,0.21894637,0.019431822,0.13303688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003873165,0.00018444861,0.4182335,0.00038802656,0.000037262573,0.0017491872,0.36956695,0.00061472435,0.0006824951,0.005277694,0.20311439,0.00011256929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95622605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9699119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04377395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04129466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03812725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29961514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073405365","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.22.2.485","title":"The Québec <i>Crime Victims Compensation Act</i>: When the Clock Is Ticking against Victims of Intra-Familial Sexual Abuse","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sexual abuse; Humanities; Ethnology; Art; Sociology; Poison control; Medicine; Medical emergency; Suicide prevention","score_opus":0.020846689618878037,"score_gpt":0.25139539734196376,"score_spread":0.23054870772308572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073405365","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15053847,0.01499627,0.0028189975,0.22729094,0.0050343745,0.0016975312,0.003512546,0.0003805122,0.59373033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4203441,0.007178806,0.005120021,0.109601535,0.0005501385,0.00065769017,0.0013440443,0.000095757125,0.45510784],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974591,0.00031597615,0.00013517025,0.00013282917,0.0009110907,0.001045852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99565434,0.00054365303,0.00044329496,0.00021256365,0.0021034384,0.0010426274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002733885,0.00038064926,0.0002810034,0.0012834693,0.0070592314,0.0026977104,0.001918286,0.0050716405,0.007886819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067326827,0.00036846634,0.00037465806,0.0011109075,0.002440874,0.00079115597,0.0013535202,0.0034798477,0.0011719894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012130968,0.00018063578,0.04905155,0.0004550621,0.00005228926,0.0010356464,0.018299041,0.0005785278,0.0026300945,0.091286354,0.7091335,0.12717612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053467047,0.00009196321,0.12181885,0.00052916806,0.000056655048,0.00025533352,0.011074108,0.00033404157,0.00080791826,0.001272161,0.863604,0.00010236826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96932095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9903751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030679047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028742904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09197438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20854533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076488515","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.25.1.128","title":"“I Wish the Supreme Court Thought More Like Dianne”: A Comment on <i>Krangle v Brisco</i>","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Wish; Political science; Art; Ethnology; Sociology; Literature","score_opus":0.020587774562238485,"score_gpt":0.2452920658503334,"score_spread":0.2247042912880949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076488515","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003781766,0.0021817086,0.00024238291,0.93954706,0.002379383,0.000017093655,0.000056087392,0.00002628362,0.05176811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05825187,0.00093498285,0.00016489747,0.8950253,0.0011644132,0.000037857437,0.000027445143,0.000045588724,0.044347648],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928363,0.0018390379,0.00019018028,0.0009257115,0.0018398211,0.0023689647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99570066,0.0019839946,0.00031577487,0.00009533697,0.001154487,0.0007498076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042561125,0.00042944544,0.00051634095,0.0006105042,0.025724756,0.010049295,0.0039006022,0.036555115,0.008850257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013673044,0.0007340967,0.0010513263,0.0010984187,0.0133663565,0.006275285,0.0041380827,0.039513946,0.001814627],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000187421,0.000011639499,0.00078814273,0.000050945673,0.000007691347,0.00069896795,0.009621765,0.000045393466,0.00021898419,0.1371217,0.8489875,0.0024284897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003819053,0.000025728628,0.0030876591,0.00047081785,0.000027682241,0.00042257243,0.03235477,0.00021333311,0.0004929111,0.024566462,0.9381643,0.00013565671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44685048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6039226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44685048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017465398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025043985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.888499},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076872046","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.25.2.221","title":"“Tony Danza Is My Sperm Donor?”: Queer Kinship and the Impact of Canadian Regulations around Sperm Donation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lesbian; Sperm donation; Queer; Legislation; Kinship; Donation; Sperm; Law reform; Sociology; Political science; Gender studies; Law; Biology; Genetics","score_opus":0.03615754962545342,"score_gpt":0.2773476550423255,"score_spread":0.24119010541687208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076872046","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78470206,0.005224503,0.0014163543,0.090690844,0.00034018286,0.00006648598,0.00012160123,0.000025680783,0.11741218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863712,0.0014764654,0.00019926723,0.0041577728,0.000024393914,0.000008864193,0.000019019353,0.000009374175,0.007733695],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99605787,0.0013902539,0.00007443242,0.0002839131,0.00111928,0.0010742496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99589133,0.0016905504,0.00047657292,0.00015851163,0.0009794275,0.00080359087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004163438,0.00019676264,0.0002778081,0.00095479493,0.045753036,0.005758797,0.0012518299,0.0019425073,0.0046946276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010283733,0.00025358493,0.00024533627,0.0016243052,0.025219578,0.002574573,0.0050666067,0.004344042,0.0001710803],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003607751,0.000021000882,0.020586211,0.00006494732,0.000010582378,0.0012947032,0.85860175,0.00011070462,0.0003765125,0.08632856,0.009494699,0.023074234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009712428,0.000022803248,0.02227117,0.00025429245,0.000024421142,0.00065411086,0.85998356,0.00014886186,0.00028786325,0.003355054,0.11291496,0.00007324551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98227906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9919877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06273676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06273676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07589997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45518917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077191540","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.21.1.35","title":"<i>High</i>: Marijuana, Women, and the Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Crime, Deviance, and Social Control","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"White (mutation); Criminology; Sociology; Gender studies; Criminal law; Feature (linguistics); Focus (optics); Political science; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.014786713359259665,"score_gpt":0.2481995382418119,"score_spread":0.23341282488255224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077191540","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.113150604,0.014773849,0.0008277888,0.05304907,0.0015181636,0.00007677125,0.00040830555,0.00007793405,0.8161176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8405978,0.010642072,0.00081153953,0.006550291,0.00047841188,0.000041215433,0.00013740653,0.00009888191,0.14064242],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999193,0.00016912342,0.000009199497,0.00004768935,0.00027838117,0.00030258854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995245,0.00014468539,0.000041730713,0.000016696718,0.00013806239,0.00013436735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005581399,0.00048924884,0.00023566461,0.002103421,0.016537279,0.009323211,0.00083102484,0.0012917356,0.010202615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015180144,0.00019072386,0.00017052398,0.0023537457,0.013789697,0.0015815226,0.0015695909,0.0023345274,0.00044180217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058335216,0.000039183164,0.0040966813,0.0002697603,0.00001079447,0.0012437578,0.4445111,0.00012048518,0.0017142002,0.31219125,0.17476816,0.060976274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034595942,0.000012985021,0.009428979,0.00027101813,0.000009809155,0.00020898586,0.20542097,0.00005262802,0.00047489651,0.003250599,0.78084505,0.000020718604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.914549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9554776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08545101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035332084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021272037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25635344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083640649","doi":"10.1353/jwl.2006.0019","title":"The Promise of Brooks v. Canada Safeway Ltd : Those Who Bear Children Should Not Be Disadvantaged","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Geography; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.029629888095780432,"score_gpt":0.27190350239811306,"score_spread":0.24227361430233263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083640649","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047586672,0.005836573,0.0016770331,0.6023756,0.0018718732,0.00006347941,0.00023323846,0.00007901014,0.3402766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54788756,0.0031263016,0.0014371035,0.25885293,0.00060318655,0.00008900736,0.000094811025,0.00007446452,0.18783465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937022,0.0006348182,0.000093886054,0.0005003475,0.0022293131,0.0028394875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995876,0.0010515221,0.00026519079,0.00017930636,0.0010093581,0.0016185987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037920605,0.00034679953,0.00037241678,0.00040721058,0.017484393,0.0069713313,0.0021826841,0.012937828,0.0059561376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01072593,0.0004434416,0.00032933097,0.0004778076,0.015311824,0.002930547,0.003884842,0.011467613,0.00062619714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070126946,0.000022155746,0.0051517095,0.00007980957,0.000017305472,0.0010120238,0.013297558,0.00026016004,0.001000073,0.73893154,0.21972138,0.020436132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052827552,0.00006046413,0.009424039,0.00047399924,0.00005323193,0.00038076143,0.016075222,0.00024661684,0.0007623411,0.054746922,0.917556,0.00016762115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9384707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97342753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06152928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03225581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1253163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2340334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084259912","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.22.1.241","title":"Budget 2010 and the Universal Child Care Benefit: An Inquiry into the Gendered Nature of Childcare in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Child care; Art; Medicine","score_opus":0.009506277630801509,"score_gpt":0.22152288642231355,"score_spread":0.21201660879151205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084259912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7375551,0.0067607337,0.0006547977,0.077593386,0.0003036863,0.00013826677,0.0018121543,0.000022435324,0.17515944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9779368,0.0018749327,0.00024690048,0.003813939,0.000030030364,0.000050788272,0.00017230958,0.000013435457,0.01586079],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923133,0.00060861785,0.00011315681,0.000342076,0.002022777,0.0046000066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99345386,0.0014703143,0.0006346898,0.00014153689,0.0019456826,0.0023539616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00264608,0.00021975276,0.00049574167,0.0017763695,0.0141894845,0.0062530437,0.001606398,0.0018907477,0.0065895473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011151183,0.00034297502,0.00043086626,0.0040493985,0.005048201,0.0017708129,0.0035746712,0.0028127225,0.00013680826],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000249029,0.00018903222,0.29116002,0.0003179274,0.000109716755,0.0014020213,0.07693268,0.0017131199,0.00081158587,0.508519,0.04432431,0.07427155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000070099384,0.00007934156,0.53551835,0.0007287873,0.00012561832,0.00019970504,0.13387507,0.001356652,0.0004620389,0.01249059,0.31494096,0.00015274959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99765044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78133917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21866086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28567034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90624267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086301890","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.21.2.267","title":"Global Distributive Justice: The Potential for a Feminist Analysis of International Tax Revenue Allocation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Tax revenue; Public economics; Tax reform; Scholarship; Economics; Double taxation; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Law; Accounting","score_opus":0.015324835057127137,"score_gpt":0.28168090878942564,"score_spread":0.2663560737322985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086301890","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031494625,0.0056735026,0.023195285,0.09727375,0.0006058408,0.00004053519,0.000066196786,0.000037618818,0.8416127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9581721,0.0023708178,0.003925911,0.0071481084,0.000605719,0.00007936156,0.000029848128,0.000082932514,0.027585195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99676573,0.0020470459,0.000033270746,0.00026651635,0.00036436986,0.0005231097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976307,0.0015690427,0.00017886709,0.00022553546,0.00020877607,0.00018706358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006025212,0.0005337496,0.0004057577,0.0024714377,0.006676308,0.009295067,0.0010843271,0.0022962638,0.007443862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004432612,0.00017593957,0.00045998156,0.0018667242,0.032880295,0.010481384,0.00521502,0.0039036905,0.00030105232],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017322336,0.000002767067,0.00010346827,0.000004445892,0.0000010662532,0.00001662322,0.002235374,0.00006185548,0.000009776286,0.99525934,0.00080363953,0.0014998735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063305497,0.000008708251,0.000618749,0.00013441409,0.0000056640174,0.000057145444,0.015206121,0.00033156946,0.00012542208,0.8629257,0.12057342,0.0000066065213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074534016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013858135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009295067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007638096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046188296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05541855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087763328","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.25.1.001","title":"Une analyse de la réglementation des personnes itinérantes selon une perspective pothienne de la discrimination","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Context (archaeology); Power (physics); Political science; Law; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.028037944334675276,"score_gpt":0.35343272136118103,"score_spread":0.32539477702650577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087763328","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9571883,0.0025341562,0.0018791938,0.006393462,0.00011970203,0.000056699944,0.000079856094,0.000008255047,0.03174034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98837847,0.0017498593,0.00044987552,0.0010133915,0.000032289747,0.000029591374,0.000034273275,0.000009969889,0.008302361],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973814,0.0011908863,0.00010915671,0.00025030866,0.00056577695,0.00050237327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978377,0.0011208728,0.00043857686,0.00009602326,0.0003522621,0.00015461768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035381871,0.00035114322,0.00036010874,0.0017891532,0.008703223,0.0048815007,0.0008337879,0.0012839057,0.0033561955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005676469,0.0003122286,0.00036181882,0.0022537133,0.008883905,0.00401024,0.0037309758,0.0027545241,0.00027098018],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000878018,0.000006653415,0.0042450973,0.000026614473,0.0000029311582,0.000493952,0.9800649,0.000012231226,0.00026110446,0.008260603,0.00035269393,0.0062643588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016132399,0.000021504677,0.015739312,0.00010559112,0.0000062141185,0.00077815366,0.94658595,0.000044968416,0.00025272756,0.0010809528,0.035369463,0.000013521489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1729242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20722526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8270758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0084648235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048281704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34383535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088124345","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.23.2.661","title":"Pensions, Privatization, and Poverty: The Gendered Impact","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Retirement, Disability, and Employment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.18585133401355308,"score_gpt":0.3433564838079058,"score_spread":0.1575051497943527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088124345","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.875951,0.013411963,0.00045906918,0.014232033,0.00009969386,0.000021415286,0.0003824205,0.000010115961,0.095432185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877965,0.0027329298,0.00007711858,0.00028785452,0.000029452305,0.000010403137,0.000024470479,0.000004354801,0.00903686],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883085,0.00034080233,0.000020811056,0.00007532648,0.00027986596,0.00045237242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837023,0.0005890476,0.00043171455,0.00007197356,0.00014924096,0.0003878118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00125957,0.00017653123,0.00025904115,0.0014226666,0.0027731974,0.002121927,0.0002997546,0.0005806457,0.014986481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003647747,0.0001088063,0.00022037614,0.0015464644,0.0036455852,0.0013706628,0.0028670293,0.0005073572,0.0002737248],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006184068,0.0002993222,0.48437816,0.00045900315,0.00018140626,0.0007281324,0.07556528,0.00096031005,0.0013728247,0.24458998,0.009128089,0.18171924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029028328,0.00020690635,0.78785837,0.0006079921,0.000082360624,0.00039529975,0.07358488,0.0002148742,0.000510242,0.026935128,0.109532714,0.000042181066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.122571886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2626103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.122571886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005328514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005369664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2437169},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090383260","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.22.2.301","title":"Let Me Tell You a Story: English-Canadian Newspapers and Sexual Assault Myths","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Gender, Feminism, and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Sexual assault; Victimisation; Ethnology; Political science; Criminology; Art; Psychology; Poison control; Sociology; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.020032261555769676,"score_gpt":0.23938859597311238,"score_spread":0.2193563344173427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090383260","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6729383,0.017519675,0.00021388153,0.08887383,0.0011604105,0.00006618774,0.001296345,0.0000438455,0.2178875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9653856,0.007896819,0.00007432821,0.004525888,0.0002788349,0.00002190188,0.00020533642,0.000031288495,0.02158006],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99708265,0.00065882865,0.000060425722,0.00016979233,0.0009918488,0.0010364088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99289,0.0028866539,0.001171948,0.00020734848,0.0018082791,0.001035763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019271098,0.0005381879,0.0003567551,0.0045588696,0.025537632,0.011819513,0.0015010515,0.0022386366,0.009450068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008129171,0.00043323298,0.0001916174,0.00711731,0.015756,0.0040389905,0.0033927697,0.003173627,0.0005949575],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064266984,0.00005805484,0.020903168,0.0002820478,0.000017788947,0.0013978909,0.8972165,0.00005147005,0.00025479,0.023887115,0.03742627,0.018440794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007077584,0.0000145764025,0.033785384,0.00034798757,0.000023040957,0.00026719607,0.81126004,0.000039293318,0.0001865322,0.00065308274,0.15337831,0.00003747357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96602714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97819227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051931597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051931597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03111277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3767919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092462314","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.26.2.03","title":"Self-Determination and Indigenous Women: Increasing Legitimacy through Inclusion","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Legitimacy; Inclusion (mineral); Self-determination; Politics; Political science; Relevance (law); Gender studies; Resistance (ecology); Sociology; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.01267717723533467,"score_gpt":0.26567028984389823,"score_spread":0.25299311260856355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092462314","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40293273,0.002231508,0.0038005647,0.04557816,0.00027369036,0.000121777346,0.000015479314,0.000043620275,0.54500246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866453,0.00036654394,0.00076112495,0.00085142296,0.00003523649,0.000021363066,0.0000030378083,0.000008728791,0.011307255],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910557,0.00439221,0.00018744598,0.00044649694,0.0020516415,0.0018663252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99428165,0.002444081,0.00067353254,0.00039707968,0.0009538436,0.0012499875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00874197,0.0002433841,0.0004062246,0.0014343917,0.02019053,0.0085239755,0.0011165214,0.0021990184,0.0036017562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012411014,0.00017609312,0.00024536575,0.00084648543,0.05168261,0.0041518114,0.015387859,0.003301305,0.00019729995],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016115495,0.00005451968,0.0050293137,0.00006321632,0.000005787537,0.00043336002,0.6318463,0.000061615676,0.0005228933,0.3258775,0.0021123786,0.03397696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027885879,0.000094366405,0.012722366,0.0007427988,0.000032609547,0.000625058,0.536654,0.000330226,0.0010435985,0.1407927,0.30686784,0.00006655976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13913396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21454082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86086607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0131656425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030360587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27664822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111591388","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.21.2.353","title":"“We-Sisters” and the Rights of Women to Equality: Analysis of Dissenting Opinions Surrounding the Enactment of Bill 63 Amending the <i>Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms</i>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Charter; Law; Political science; Politics; Human rights; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Commission; Dissent; Gender studies","score_opus":0.025655351986993542,"score_gpt":0.2726229478476195,"score_spread":0.24696759586062594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111591388","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60221297,0.0073144203,0.0011698212,0.18674268,0.0014624912,0.0002304943,0.00013355975,0.000020754796,0.20071279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95090467,0.0010003238,0.0002369293,0.024158081,0.00017452055,0.000071019575,0.000027089223,0.000023839335,0.023403473],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97182804,0.013207692,0.0005677389,0.0018162932,0.006149242,0.0064309323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.981517,0.012003974,0.001124642,0.00038481114,0.003434861,0.0015347066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020646648,0.0006128282,0.00071568583,0.0030059416,0.077018715,0.010699778,0.003352201,0.012108568,0.003513426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03172821,0.0005924459,0.00052710826,0.0037616573,0.05859471,0.004097113,0.0057219933,0.012736515,0.00029393894],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030389792,0.000016292006,0.0011025948,0.000050397055,0.000007839103,0.0007423018,0.8903194,0.000051824,0.00039173898,0.091345444,0.011875605,0.004066206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000130777435,0.000021409029,0.004717341,0.00024007923,0.000011337073,0.00010225996,0.8246133,0.00009781631,0.0004134591,0.004059457,0.16564377,0.00006670848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8740118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9225563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12598819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.082195595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051728394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59637356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124257432","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.22.2.329","title":"Negotiating Sex: The Legal Construct of Consent in Cases of Wife Rape in Ontario, Canada","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Wife; Ethnology; Political science; Sociology; Art; Law","score_opus":0.03455471204583089,"score_gpt":0.2667251686062037,"score_spread":0.23217045656037283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124257432","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94229144,0.0015115027,0.00028038037,0.007756216,0.00005358885,0.0001458951,0.0001699223,0.0000071746026,0.047783908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993926,0.00084256066,0.00012049187,0.00044001252,0.000009122563,0.000028438835,0.000048666454,0.00000435944,0.004580246],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945464,0.0012510354,0.00025449094,0.00028410694,0.0017305102,0.0019334579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99330467,0.0028715467,0.0013001064,0.00029331085,0.0012702321,0.0009601182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003220174,0.00019573889,0.00028832673,0.0015052855,0.01422181,0.0042930525,0.0017596479,0.0014923895,0.0034789247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02111081,0.0003667437,0.0002205258,0.00278766,0.013204698,0.0015419187,0.00387971,0.0017929272,0.00013450913],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018591435,0.00010121618,0.21450149,0.00021361889,0.00002336484,0.0033662866,0.6923059,0.00033667308,0.0007033975,0.04414884,0.0061436757,0.037969533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021873197,0.000036916637,0.23038498,0.00027933443,0.000021264521,0.00079089793,0.7192194,0.00030105165,0.00022875667,0.003090945,0.045559663,0.00006496446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99154073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9967861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.087827526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.087827526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14491083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6372363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125884035","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.22.1.027","title":"Women, Substantive Equality, and Fiscal Policy: Gender-Based Analysis of Taxes, Benefits, and Budgets","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Gender equality; Sociology; Art; Gender studies","score_opus":0.0390689647909661,"score_gpt":0.2741626466090408,"score_spread":0.23509368181807472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125884035","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7797884,0.007284626,0.004336474,0.011761831,0.00010264248,0.00007941269,0.0005978869,0.000013569594,0.19603516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99046963,0.0011994594,0.00039223544,0.00033121547,0.000025355566,0.000034852073,0.00005411938,0.000008959224,0.007484182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824834,0.00072484504,0.000036630317,0.00010841586,0.00029399048,0.0005878349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981358,0.0010878938,0.00031970843,0.00008041721,0.00018156237,0.00019455183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020523143,0.00016752603,0.00033299706,0.0025690994,0.002174335,0.0034203432,0.00050418166,0.0004959019,0.0073757996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065445052,0.00010985709,0.0003164336,0.0034191099,0.004414334,0.0017274916,0.0019764786,0.00069041183,0.0001515613],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017140106,0.00007936801,0.16287093,0.00013520151,0.000062303494,0.00021325225,0.044085164,0.0011671111,0.00024515524,0.73507524,0.0030332971,0.052861545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023828872,0.00013258509,0.5068961,0.00073725404,0.0001168282,0.00015913245,0.17040594,0.0018477998,0.00061698916,0.15204662,0.16698074,0.000036240872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1257823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23305091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8742177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010320562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009138905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25010037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128594652","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.22.2.435","title":"The Sexual Assault of Intoxicated Women","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Humanities; Sexual assault; Political science; Philosophy; Poison control; Medicine; Suicide prevention; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.01572354098577717,"score_gpt":0.25762219054198343,"score_spread":0.24189864955620627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128594652","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91627294,0.0033020568,0.00039521686,0.01485762,0.00027377033,0.00004881301,0.00015790216,0.000015189118,0.064676605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97491294,0.0025300968,0.000117853124,0.0022580677,0.000044641736,0.0000074895966,0.000033951703,0.0000062491204,0.02008875],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989863,0.00018884074,0.000026912332,0.000057491598,0.000332448,0.0004079384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992125,0.00020076943,0.00017724767,0.000036442445,0.00019723423,0.00017581617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047168936,0.000210707,0.00021991311,0.000747987,0.013204133,0.0020795234,0.00054349995,0.0014931039,0.004537988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002234137,0.00021195771,0.0002000066,0.001111477,0.0060990676,0.0006916671,0.0023209895,0.0020580413,0.00021250344],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015715248,0.00009664088,0.16488902,0.00026742887,0.000037437072,0.010036496,0.6312686,0.00052516884,0.0032317385,0.09884892,0.021390613,0.0692507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015621548,0.00013950182,0.18371649,0.00060650415,0.000052437354,0.004510362,0.5474288,0.0004332618,0.0013688289,0.0031053058,0.2585141,0.00010882393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9268144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96630424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07318562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015494276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021840636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14723319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133808670","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.21.1.55","title":"Penguins and Polyamory: Using Law and Film to Explore the Essence of Marriage in Canadian Family Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Legalization; Context (archaeology); Family law; Sociology; Popularity; Law; Sodomy; Value (mathematics); Gender studies; Criminology; Political science; History; Homosexuality","score_opus":0.054451489957730026,"score_gpt":0.29393273377880597,"score_spread":0.23948124382107594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133808670","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6258065,0.011141496,0.0019801492,0.02475874,0.0006824047,0.00011627089,0.0003323308,0.00006824147,0.33511385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797387,0.003688913,0.0007634084,0.0012236267,0.000065166634,0.000035773814,0.00006425944,0.000031520132,0.014388505],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985152,0.00059144315,0.000025692309,0.00012477783,0.00033399797,0.00040888268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977615,0.0013165935,0.0001661329,0.00008939065,0.00035581313,0.00031063057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014807421,0.0006453072,0.00039846238,0.004049481,0.02717328,0.010102878,0.0017876934,0.002237542,0.005207458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005836648,0.0003534275,0.00028746598,0.0041274186,0.024532983,0.0041688723,0.003904523,0.0031291666,0.00020625014],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020777527,0.00001659685,0.002227343,0.00007569564,0.000005250887,0.00057538814,0.94568604,0.00005562179,0.00040524706,0.03481958,0.004484596,0.011627776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004830117,0.000017643133,0.009701332,0.00020522889,0.000015527394,0.00021518514,0.8407443,0.00014376709,0.0001917252,0.0025099264,0.14621864,0.000031883734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9581799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9857244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059483685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059483685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028875334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43158638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134709509","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.22.1.129","title":"The Fiscal Equality of Women: Proposed Changes to Legislation Governing Private Pension Plans in Alberta, British Columbia, Ontario, and Nova Scotia","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Nova scotia; Private pension; Pension; Humanities; Ethnology; Sociology; Art; Law","score_opus":0.02209024727789921,"score_gpt":0.24867025096218207,"score_spread":0.22658000368428285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134709509","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7757256,0.0053190785,0.00070094696,0.052062653,0.00066643633,0.00037809825,0.0016079069,0.000046416462,0.16349287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9294662,0.0017495756,0.0008258336,0.0057173385,0.00011604272,0.0001275257,0.00034777328,0.000016789725,0.061632946],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940485,0.000602521,0.00018557173,0.00030459417,0.0015336177,0.0033252437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99524456,0.0006363929,0.0005010965,0.00015257261,0.0014097715,0.0020554438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004832104,0.00021460824,0.00029634338,0.0016591887,0.00878992,0.0051910696,0.0022234588,0.001560014,0.0040149605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00910536,0.00033560424,0.00034254233,0.0021625964,0.004300858,0.0008420163,0.0028087865,0.0015574531,0.00020668618],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011143883,0.00024624096,0.36743394,0.00082645623,0.00013938796,0.0021680214,0.14755045,0.0028026903,0.003118085,0.20635808,0.078870535,0.18937172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010401524,0.00011757292,0.5986844,0.0007212962,0.000080463484,0.00016488039,0.06267824,0.0004357808,0.00072945177,0.0031557742,0.33302104,0.00010702401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9874681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99647224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10804752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10804752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20409869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7839433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138032363","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.23.2.488","title":"A Human Right to Group Self-Identification? Reflections on <i>Nixon v. Vancouver Rape Relief</i>","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Ethnology; Sociology","score_opus":0.03096918800383353,"score_gpt":0.25453497422966115,"score_spread":0.22356578622582762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138032363","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20282166,0.010066053,0.0005123091,0.3126967,0.0009558636,0.00009359155,0.00008328073,0.000016837928,0.4727537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86584836,0.003235571,0.00021163443,0.02803848,0.00013837243,0.00006258229,0.000022003003,0.000020032128,0.10242287],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911532,0.0034379165,0.0001091449,0.0004952911,0.0015497286,0.0032547058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956,0.0013230833,0.00028757058,0.000208962,0.00096031436,0.0016201234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059187147,0.00026756545,0.00038855104,0.0009621387,0.041397687,0.011126031,0.0017814195,0.005039708,0.009086213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058561927,0.00039545284,0.00021598443,0.0011400107,0.032178443,0.002637149,0.006650484,0.0069865324,0.00055435946],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000640983,0.0000865836,0.010200638,0.00016080675,0.000012384319,0.0011403911,0.43421662,0.00011779321,0.00048132672,0.42856213,0.083492145,0.041465104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002455731,0.000032451288,0.01128544,0.0005201734,0.000010847854,0.0002516552,0.511714,0.0000533806,0.00029762834,0.011223247,0.46454078,0.000045933037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9301327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97031087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06986731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048704665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05606445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35337877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156874062","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.22.1.213","title":"The “Wicked Problem” of Fiscal Equality for Women","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Ethnology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.021063567933980436,"score_gpt":0.24849004088293505,"score_spread":0.22742647294895463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156874062","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14733198,0.009116818,0.014353204,0.28977108,0.0010806015,0.000070433496,0.00034402494,0.000052518684,0.53787935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9311743,0.00378968,0.002388548,0.010858305,0.00025274305,0.0000825098,0.000055780336,0.00003459103,0.05136358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994599,0.0017176778,0.00012157431,0.0005156898,0.0012398994,0.0018061079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973514,0.00096901867,0.00032507797,0.00032347295,0.00052941527,0.0005015616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056812963,0.0003083813,0.00058117724,0.0016284,0.01397913,0.008599279,0.0014959223,0.0025912467,0.008722106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0099803,0.00026223733,0.00039426106,0.0024388928,0.026839374,0.005858503,0.0074289073,0.0037689693,0.00045794717],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066552216,0.0000036378785,0.00086241926,0.00001590995,0.0000028742083,0.00004529164,0.0046705874,0.000066647524,0.000025383786,0.9861428,0.002322441,0.005835404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022583703,0.000020180752,0.0043436,0.0004120208,0.000019143816,0.00027523734,0.03940907,0.0003224105,0.00025451873,0.6189255,0.33596122,0.000034484707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33567047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48336175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6643295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022863258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039636567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66743326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2235448125","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.27.2.248","title":"Religious Freedom and Sexual Orientation: Equality Jurisprudence and Intersecting Identities","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Sexual orientation; Charter; Religious identity; Identity (music); Sociology; Human sexuality; Diversity (politics); Gender studies; Freedom of religion; Political science; Representation (politics); Law; Human rights; Philosophy","score_opus":0.041832176519524124,"score_gpt":0.30508476836259724,"score_spread":0.2632525918430731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2235448125","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.119435124,0.017026678,0.0036229407,0.10562999,0.000400887,0.00007033797,0.000117130105,0.00003275752,0.7536642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97097474,0.0034459627,0.0009803677,0.0047345874,0.00011208809,0.000022043014,0.000024862175,0.000017696897,0.019687653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910375,0.0024457457,0.00016871511,0.000623254,0.0032651082,0.002459803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955254,0.0018044316,0.00029184925,0.0001761815,0.0009223929,0.0012797355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053578145,0.00027386888,0.00050486455,0.0026863457,0.028781645,0.01612597,0.0018311475,0.0033896882,0.004661431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007304769,0.0003083072,0.00030283016,0.0033926761,0.104768336,0.0033787056,0.007281201,0.005662834,0.00018670599],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004237833,0.00001174414,0.0010320144,0.000021536847,0.0000023605025,0.000110566296,0.032084804,0.00007407314,0.00006445463,0.95606446,0.0022205294,0.008309248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000302815,0.000030104817,0.025397044,0.00084378564,0.000026443373,0.00023398413,0.14407969,0.0007379097,0.00034293233,0.39935598,0.42882642,0.00009543134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97262055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98051757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13604142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13604142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17671251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98705417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2251680096","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.27.2.224","title":"Critical Indigenous Legal Theory Part 1: The Dialogue Within","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Feeling; Publishing; Consciousness; Law; Sociology; Project commissioning; Practice of law; Political science; Legal profession; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06063740446722613,"score_gpt":0.3302824035192133,"score_spread":0.26964499905198713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2251680096","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08072455,0.014439076,0.020254305,0.108563505,0.0016762025,0.00026760157,0.000067834524,0.00009865405,0.7739083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94064385,0.003227974,0.004074122,0.006472926,0.00041083823,0.00020792628,0.000025124085,0.00008295548,0.044854283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98573965,0.00975744,0.00020345619,0.0010383398,0.0019519774,0.0013091551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99003893,0.007042871,0.00055043603,0.0005261793,0.0011168047,0.00072465907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011800297,0.00055312493,0.00059407187,0.0028457795,0.024251524,0.013634456,0.0029625131,0.0062640877,0.006098201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014260563,0.00039254947,0.00046146024,0.0025577934,0.092894234,0.016211912,0.008755932,0.008814291,0.0005789519],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003973047,0.000010880643,0.0001483118,0.00006868402,0.000001563944,0.00017727286,0.24653506,0.00004722439,0.000068203546,0.74822354,0.0026019132,0.002113456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007391004,0.000022014576,0.00056831323,0.0007532658,0.000008207205,0.0003396814,0.35771072,0.00049336,0.0003530646,0.2978077,0.34190804,0.000028318458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09305947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06972541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9069405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029663984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022620628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21522826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269485834","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.27.2.157","title":"Edward Greenspan: A Feminist Reflection on the Eulogies Surrounding His Death","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Criminology; Reflection (computer programming); Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Sociology; Sexual assault; Law; Political science; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Medicine; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.09050535326923154,"score_gpt":0.30617153508879663,"score_spread":0.2156661818195651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269485834","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004777474,0.019949805,0.00031883543,0.94156945,0.011599871,0.0000064189694,0.0000296749,0.000011722326,0.02173678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17668098,0.017309913,0.00045412735,0.72555065,0.00972978,0.000037592883,0.000025241703,0.00012214106,0.070089504],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936265,0.0030646648,0.00012084009,0.00067525683,0.0012393146,0.0012734024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919224,0.0056630787,0.00041554123,0.00011563614,0.0009487658,0.0009345528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006651577,0.000787251,0.0008009101,0.0007802433,0.029915094,0.007747608,0.0022216865,0.018600978,0.00447499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01463661,0.00047130554,0.00042822174,0.0011530976,0.033685528,0.006215876,0.00493274,0.023330485,0.0007105336],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039007624,0.000006125812,0.000329859,0.00015047393,0.000008729606,0.001467408,0.12962274,0.00013622713,0.00019416235,0.10386787,0.7578974,0.0062800623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033990493,0.000007690082,0.00038849402,0.00035293426,0.0000033010006,0.00028836523,0.05040669,0.000029104054,0.00011921857,0.004739282,0.9436356,0.000025961013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28919747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44330925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71080256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023707256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5750283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269571185","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.27.2.284","title":"Transforming Choices: The Marginalization of Gender-Specific Policy Making in Canadian Approaches to Women's Federal Imprisonment","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Imprisonment; Conceptualization; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Service (business); Sociology; Law; Medicine; Business","score_opus":0.10777846183729474,"score_gpt":0.29325069503793944,"score_spread":0.1854722332006447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269571185","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25718096,0.009719135,0.007177329,0.3207285,0.0009634491,0.0003583304,0.00031566262,0.00012216659,0.40343446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9690647,0.0024896727,0.002107917,0.00845448,0.000046716326,0.00012610786,0.00004547353,0.00007145297,0.017593438],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96250474,0.015301257,0.00074328406,0.0021898712,0.007965898,0.011294916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.976834,0.011051853,0.0010806292,0.0009848506,0.006142012,0.0039066197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028317492,0.0007797334,0.00081461,0.0048012054,0.08879972,0.023225332,0.0041456884,0.0057678134,0.006556949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033380155,0.00084222975,0.0008816969,0.0065004895,0.067342155,0.00695152,0.016175274,0.008018561,0.00029972292],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037345137,0.00002705728,0.0020862578,0.00012107303,0.000016111971,0.00041740434,0.49503163,0.0003134724,0.0002594419,0.46812275,0.013698815,0.019868655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026314423,0.00002744154,0.007861031,0.00062451384,0.00003921335,0.00009416479,0.643303,0.00058492646,0.00043554185,0.06138814,0.2854372,0.00017849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9912225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.994121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6730605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.32693952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.45457208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7806548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339999129","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.28.1.230","title":"Case Commentary: <i>R. v Walsh</i> and the “Myth” of Marital Rape","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Mythology; Context (archaeology); Meaning (existential); Plaintiff; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; History; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.02778402045500947,"score_gpt":0.2688105540889784,"score_spread":0.24102653363396895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339999129","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024045825,0.004683866,0.00014511697,0.96077704,0.014582492,0.000031062755,0.000042020172,0.000014856165,0.017318988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04970036,0.0054314546,0.00024198032,0.9181579,0.013995301,0.00008918903,0.000020757756,0.000033725926,0.012329362],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99066645,0.004236379,0.0006349628,0.0011782271,0.0018989237,0.0013850054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9853212,0.011062379,0.0008981286,0.00029011807,0.0014193393,0.0010088047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006131585,0.0006761434,0.0012859331,0.0013982448,0.016278042,0.004519348,0.00509016,0.053371713,0.005367103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036434904,0.00059410435,0.0010629162,0.0017288052,0.0115852235,0.0038970285,0.0031664094,0.035405282,0.0013587853],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029308969,0.000015999774,0.0003769415,0.0003001376,0.000012585703,0.0060577067,0.016221788,0.00008002436,0.00020753453,0.05353734,0.91726613,0.0058945576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026629303,0.000034266803,0.0010683575,0.0019936955,0.00003746473,0.0055539734,0.02696824,0.00016293612,0.00027320048,0.010429165,0.9533612,0.00009093244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14689445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17286606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14689445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011851256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017734844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29207885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2507876249","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.28.2.314","title":"Indian Act Sex Discrimination: Enough Inquiry Already, Just Fix It","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; Criminology; Law; Sex discrimination; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.065825242173339,"score_gpt":0.3111458523708563,"score_spread":0.24532061019751727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2507876249","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018759625,0.015490439,0.000788671,0.8331148,0.007596617,0.000022938615,0.000063464824,0.0000444271,0.12411898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51700145,0.018560039,0.0025895603,0.3978893,0.0053500277,0.000062866544,0.00006593977,0.00008535161,0.058395565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935343,0.0020273433,0.00022833192,0.00043751663,0.002017619,0.0017548329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935648,0.0025159488,0.00036016747,0.00048392854,0.0020508517,0.0010242569],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053335335,0.00039674705,0.00062052964,0.0010114542,0.019038936,0.011189363,0.0015381565,0.0068173334,0.0042731557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0120628625,0.00026300977,0.00062609394,0.0014256068,0.026745187,0.0077035525,0.0046052923,0.01580433,0.00093467446],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000340727,0.00009005703,0.004191869,0.00022401613,0.000020176549,0.0004772222,0.06341976,0.000072304494,0.0006581061,0.75398195,0.13334501,0.043485448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074163763,0.000039910738,0.004362325,0.0015083048,0.00006310614,0.00040418838,0.12228862,0.000079505546,0.0005813414,0.08760026,0.78297126,0.00009374244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17742033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2509852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8225797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011029501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02864298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35277522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510983704","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.28.2.321","title":"Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women Crisis: Technological Dimensions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Stalking; Harassment; Criminology; Racism; Pornography; Sociology; Colonialism; Political science; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.025266399982947687,"score_gpt":0.27174622918849006,"score_spread":0.24647982920554237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510983704","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6838654,0.0050135734,0.0021466652,0.04982404,0.00032663977,0.00009454862,0.00015479665,0.00005877335,0.25851554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98314166,0.0041733454,0.0006645208,0.0014309577,0.00007071011,0.00003912222,0.00003430066,0.000019138442,0.0104261525],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980488,0.00048766905,0.000051798823,0.0001351112,0.00060404063,0.0006726178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997936,0.00083241897,0.00030455575,0.00012750435,0.00035098742,0.0004486437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014348392,0.00029689312,0.0002705916,0.0022119998,0.015870476,0.010882287,0.0015645622,0.0018734176,0.0057141045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004498188,0.00026282706,0.00023121659,0.002456136,0.021760708,0.005419677,0.00921373,0.0025080063,0.00033028747],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040298004,0.000057825222,0.024467219,0.00033636272,0.000016997374,0.003116997,0.8127344,0.00024358704,0.00097101065,0.104262,0.004509054,0.049244188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002892518,0.000026646298,0.011086474,0.00029701297,0.000012296115,0.00076289836,0.86611116,0.00010138076,0.00028234872,0.005796592,0.11549563,0.000024596557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42097318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5067613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5790268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01762255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01993639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83704567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2516513570","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.28.2.452","title":"Re-Imagining an Agentic Ashley: <i>Looking for Ashley: Re-Reading What the Smith Case Reveals about the Governance of Girls, Mothers and Families in Canada</i> by Rebecca Jaremko Bromwich","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Corporate governance; Sociology; Close reading; Gender studies; Art; Political science; Law; Management; Literature","score_opus":0.016094479932095562,"score_gpt":0.23070454436014662,"score_spread":0.21461006442805106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2516513570","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041182205,0.011578111,0.0015653752,0.7509196,0.00390689,0.000051050512,0.00015918628,0.000084888416,0.19055271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7117238,0.008265313,0.0013452896,0.12479485,0.0008704015,0.00006292348,0.00007550724,0.0004396667,0.15242222],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99395657,0.0019207776,0.00009607771,0.00051324663,0.0009812805,0.0025319564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99414885,0.001960774,0.0002158407,0.0002412168,0.0015958487,0.0018374562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004706576,0.0009332817,0.00079607655,0.0016574708,0.059411842,0.021935146,0.0039557493,0.01191474,0.008415925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009204168,0.00072962954,0.00050617446,0.002258407,0.06638753,0.011242276,0.006532484,0.023301732,0.0008409543],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026915788,0.00001661469,0.0008041848,0.000062686806,0.000013554039,0.0006712053,0.41017696,0.0002153991,0.00025887697,0.3465487,0.2309274,0.010277401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063254047,0.0000052878563,0.0008475135,0.00024054734,0.000015037407,0.00015117,0.36949182,0.00011009698,0.00025542,0.027058084,0.60175973,0.00005891533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.984814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9915371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13042952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13042952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14046115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94633687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2516762043","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.28.2.393","title":"The Berger Inquiry in Retrospect: Its Legacy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Economic Justice; Sustainability; Sociology; Social justice; Environmental justice; Political science; Law; Environmental ethics; Social science; Ecology","score_opus":0.025794540887707666,"score_gpt":0.27102162932080376,"score_spread":0.2452270884330961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2516762043","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01849219,0.019198429,0.001208432,0.84358513,0.008041247,0.00001599873,0.000042848274,0.00006248899,0.109353326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55084145,0.009859996,0.0010662067,0.30847606,0.0061669718,0.000058244008,0.000028719342,0.0001633023,0.12333901],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9811334,0.010235731,0.0003896455,0.0017711107,0.0039335033,0.0025367436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98782665,0.007481836,0.0007033429,0.0005936734,0.0018083237,0.0015861983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015151326,0.00052902877,0.00061135745,0.0017849487,0.026586154,0.013505442,0.0019530682,0.010778907,0.0048285644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03264546,0.00062446523,0.00031566163,0.0019846268,0.048029605,0.009268635,0.010307701,0.013473408,0.0013537117],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057534788,0.00003957707,0.0013334583,0.00012656282,0.000009468001,0.0006169686,0.10985211,0.000091022885,0.00013066495,0.6524784,0.19996552,0.03529879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054405605,0.00001851099,0.000683824,0.0003774973,0.0000048994825,0.00025850142,0.03588655,0.00007168317,0.00012126086,0.03955484,0.92297596,0.00004109546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.070187375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.085227415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9298126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0134213595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014973367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13955772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2517766571","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.28.2.308","title":"A Long Road Behind Us, a Long Road Ahead: Towards an Indigenous Feminist National Inquiry","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Dehumanization; Gender studies; Context (archaeology); White (mutation); Government (linguistics); Political science; Indigenous culture; Sociology; Criminology; Economic growth; Geography; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.030865202705714592,"score_gpt":0.30395429673987756,"score_spread":0.273089094034163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2517766571","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13680369,0.033310045,0.0034736672,0.5297403,0.0021701157,0.000068058594,0.000048124544,0.000026860702,0.29435927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93315333,0.010602578,0.0025939173,0.030528223,0.00049288064,0.00009475454,0.000013363238,0.000029931023,0.022491096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900879,0.006321864,0.00015250337,0.0004840512,0.0014524362,0.0015011777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99301684,0.0038850727,0.00037396583,0.00034079116,0.0011081002,0.0012752356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013154316,0.0003015435,0.0006363049,0.0012713257,0.032614235,0.011533351,0.0016388071,0.0052911504,0.002360441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009592685,0.00026801098,0.0003047033,0.001192981,0.053936083,0.012935708,0.0072275097,0.008686688,0.00022003833],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009220339,0.00003649421,0.001858282,0.00014312337,0.000006533026,0.00038846442,0.40481034,0.00005460977,0.00015221881,0.57113004,0.010409217,0.011001376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023483065,0.000017448994,0.0021746212,0.0007427848,0.000009804338,0.00022992786,0.73392016,0.0000926729,0.00014570319,0.08158148,0.18106182,0.000021265041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17784885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33454853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8221512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018040402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03728126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35362732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2518373336","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.28.2.253","title":"Shining Light on the Dark Places: Addressing Police Racism and Sexualized Violence against Indigenous Women and Girls in the National Inquiry","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Racism; Criminology; Legislature; Human rights; Economic Justice; Political science; Criminal justice; Sociology; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.05553313272257683,"score_gpt":0.31359552236632693,"score_spread":0.2580623896437501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2518373336","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3109513,0.04789129,0.0009331211,0.5556848,0.0018767394,0.00020355528,0.00017174144,0.000039056307,0.08224843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.892224,0.03985517,0.0019087761,0.050817814,0.00053596054,0.00012499657,0.00007969147,0.000038495393,0.014415207],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99175686,0.0033329327,0.00017613027,0.0002983173,0.0017255478,0.002710203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98711735,0.004128747,0.0010648798,0.0002787104,0.003380027,0.0040303464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008465027,0.00040708698,0.0007851637,0.0025297874,0.03880867,0.011153635,0.0029756804,0.0036587042,0.0021968747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013296735,0.00037073102,0.00050661416,0.0027644339,0.021751698,0.004433191,0.010347588,0.007893672,0.00019497536],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034078927,0.00014345917,0.05489915,0.0010030535,0.00007004242,0.002254347,0.75417376,0.00022662297,0.00041505945,0.043340653,0.044579413,0.09886037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031070913,0.00003101175,0.021728702,0.0011803675,0.000045967616,0.00033222954,0.8765435,0.00007567807,0.00015024912,0.004041711,0.095829345,0.000038118087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93253154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.975904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.067468464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061307874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23732615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4448219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2549256179","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.28.3.568","title":"Les femmes et le travail de soins aux enfants : quelle reconnaissance par les régimes étatiques d'indemnisation ?","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Health, Medicine and Society","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08326347946918894,"score_gpt":0.36240308666210863,"score_spread":0.2791396071929197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2549256179","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6883734,0.012652833,0.002363818,0.051761452,0.0004319394,0.000046985973,0.00007608792,0.000023985413,0.24426946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94861466,0.0035840885,0.0005139451,0.00323486,0.00006669164,0.00002762,0.000012276797,0.00000797761,0.043937825],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834347,0.00060885225,0.000028662458,0.00014749083,0.00021164193,0.000659904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913687,0.00023435253,0.00020145539,0.00004650531,0.00019584509,0.00018505212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015452618,0.00022409692,0.00021694062,0.0004537814,0.008446458,0.0026032608,0.00054571754,0.0017025426,0.004294924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027657882,0.00014129179,0.00018233462,0.00042163176,0.0104383705,0.0012560609,0.0019119859,0.0018394688,0.0003056],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006527525,0.000045936773,0.04565793,0.00017867304,0.000022412425,0.0025208008,0.5072562,0.00022011454,0.0014413558,0.37031233,0.00952354,0.06275541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015141706,0.00015068865,0.13991177,0.0011144354,0.0000459659,0.0021158243,0.43942368,0.00022214453,0.00087993743,0.019272784,0.3967611,0.00008657968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44101942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6676683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5589806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008093918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010523468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8769048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2551268723","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.28.3.617","title":"Dénonciation, régulation et réforme du droit de la famille par les groupes de pères séparés : ce que nous apprend la comparaison France-Québec","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Journal of Communication (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010688077683871536,"score_gpt":0.2227661887705756,"score_spread":0.21207811108670407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2551268723","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7784226,0.008917205,0.0010266552,0.028719466,0.00012549157,0.000050321076,0.0001825223,0.00001913309,0.18253663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.970036,0.0012149883,0.00017326383,0.00091879116,0.000015187562,0.00001868644,0.000022775828,0.000004940682,0.027595397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826753,0.00037647027,0.000026982472,0.00014031047,0.00036878293,0.0008198225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998749,0.0001982245,0.00023637644,0.000073815536,0.0003761841,0.00036641333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016180766,0.00014502493,0.00023132819,0.0012061783,0.010087859,0.0031014567,0.00067503855,0.0010467721,0.0042956783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021276989,0.00011492669,0.0001335608,0.0015052883,0.007793007,0.0010188809,0.0020130877,0.0013535357,0.00017795253],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014490006,0.00007206733,0.04845066,0.00019473689,0.000032385266,0.00073580386,0.358601,0.00058075157,0.001707563,0.48944673,0.017336387,0.08269704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026903974,0.000103332335,0.30516064,0.00046634272,0.000029650024,0.00028354605,0.26013133,0.0003703197,0.00066334347,0.008179929,0.4245138,0.00007086509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9178791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96082944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.082120895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039144006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034318395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.284011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2552359120","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.28.3.469","title":"Couvrez ce genre que le droit ne saurait voir : la difficile circulation du concept féministe de genre dans la langue juridique","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02030823337392406,"score_gpt":0.25446448872416444,"score_spread":0.23415625535024037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2552359120","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05756034,0.04440442,0.0060201315,0.1025123,0.003668695,0.000052499032,0.0007843932,0.00010954109,0.7848877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.760135,0.01344811,0.0027170188,0.009828638,0.0012307294,0.00010992609,0.00036637433,0.00024022593,0.21192406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99683666,0.0013316527,0.00010366725,0.0004142581,0.0009344353,0.00037944177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99750274,0.001035627,0.00021468523,0.00015120255,0.0007996693,0.000296073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025390815,0.00047455786,0.00043465328,0.0025749723,0.011945306,0.009351378,0.0010277241,0.002158157,0.011569617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048224437,0.0002697277,0.00031234056,0.002936663,0.019402217,0.0061955494,0.0020859772,0.0048767203,0.0018920195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032506407,0.000009788082,0.0017181127,0.0001360107,0.0000066179728,0.00017298029,0.10254589,0.000079900994,0.00034623392,0.8347641,0.035285037,0.02490287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006680844,0.00001259998,0.003963783,0.0004254601,0.000007772994,0.000128831,0.030936018,0.0001066772,0.00016759695,0.017681897,0.9465312,0.00003146841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5432967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5948356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5432967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024657995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019689852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91878587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604592581","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.29.1.110","title":"From the Invisible Hand to the Invisible Woman: A Gender Perspective on the Tax Policy Discourse on Social Tax Expenditures","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Obstacle; Face (sociological concept); Welfare; Profit (economics); Social Welfare; Tax policy; Welfare state; Public economics; For profit; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Law; Tax reform; Social science; Politics","score_opus":0.06870872667434458,"score_gpt":0.3555241493173292,"score_spread":0.2868154226429846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604592581","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48670405,0.009026708,0.004749215,0.10255353,0.0007306988,0.00005652254,0.00017017164,0.000032890635,0.39597633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859197,0.0015941606,0.00038795057,0.0018273594,0.0000859908,0.000015023867,0.000018971854,0.000030458968,0.010120301],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945575,0.0031685964,0.00008892219,0.0003118935,0.00092060276,0.0009524282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961504,0.002446451,0.00039503662,0.00009518213,0.000506511,0.00040651474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057888026,0.0007211929,0.00052371953,0.0039907806,0.025191829,0.013761057,0.0012286864,0.0029820206,0.003430494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005485509,0.0003384781,0.00033497787,0.003777003,0.047893398,0.008330593,0.005059797,0.004944613,0.0002642618],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012228463,0.000009736234,0.0007018742,0.000027458289,0.0000025423299,0.00020990804,0.68985265,0.000047842415,0.00018884707,0.3049448,0.0014643505,0.0025377737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009610131,0.000016609982,0.0023813325,0.0005302605,0.000018147337,0.0001726469,0.76704097,0.0002214698,0.00058130024,0.03220906,0.19678858,0.00003001461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42046684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40205196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57953316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.056762204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025929946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8360389},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604767750","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.29.1.83","title":"La traite des femmes dans le contexte des grands évènements sportifs : quel plan de match ?","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.043268785252391924,"score_gpt":0.28194038450946846,"score_spread":0.23867159925707654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604767750","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4133985,0.004070616,0.12392239,0.04234151,0.0010359817,0.00012706939,0.0004471392,0.00029593965,0.41436073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.971824,0.0006428404,0.009453805,0.0009009179,0.00007153666,0.00006986846,0.000075784665,0.000049431404,0.016911902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881727,0.00069421093,0.000036794714,0.00021802359,0.000106615946,0.00012715408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992968,0.0003559802,0.00010092282,0.00007825114,0.00009778678,0.000070222384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017555492,0.0004123417,0.0002625623,0.0005553243,0.0031973806,0.002911637,0.00055796036,0.0013631955,0.005253641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002533618,0.00020844818,0.0003082399,0.0005264904,0.014096228,0.0033683362,0.0020258133,0.0018444975,0.000454359],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007327496,0.00002280304,0.006604817,0.00012564119,0.00001488153,0.0004575656,0.16840783,0.00026132958,0.0012965872,0.7949669,0.0044235657,0.023344886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028954713,0.00019002797,0.026977545,0.00069575006,0.00008386542,0.0017839352,0.2601286,0.0024516808,0.001990452,0.33362,0.37193564,0.00011354059],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017856497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021379026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9821435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018359125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013450282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035505116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605000961","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.29.1.157","title":"Challenging Colonial Norms and Attending to Presencing in Stories of Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Scholarship; Resistance (ecology); Transformative learning; Criminology; Colonialism; Sociology; Ethnography; Gender studies; Political science; History; Law; Anthropology; Ecology","score_opus":0.025931977857568702,"score_gpt":0.2930801448877805,"score_spread":0.2671481670302118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605000961","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9234849,0.0024960234,0.0010012405,0.029398149,0.00030742807,0.0000632205,0.00005257533,0.000034666034,0.04316184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99191815,0.0010547513,0.0002850607,0.0013822969,0.00004398781,0.000028545286,0.000011980017,0.000027246882,0.0052479566],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98791426,0.00680589,0.00027168452,0.0005626573,0.0016160758,0.0028294928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868079,0.007688213,0.0012979243,0.00047823024,0.0013802242,0.0023475247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009120146,0.00085017475,0.0007606452,0.0024039403,0.05957923,0.011732249,0.004003973,0.0048754755,0.0027017235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021035,0.0006965619,0.00034343585,0.0019732942,0.06572472,0.006764976,0.0138554685,0.01019754,0.00023788668],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003105949,0.000003256438,0.00032817377,0.000010817817,0.0000011809254,0.0003524975,0.9963406,0.0000077759105,0.000045984514,0.0018701714,0.00039822992,0.0006382635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.308714e-7,0.0000033838614,0.0004433918,0.00004105967,0.000001778869,0.00011404844,0.9914459,0.000010446074,0.00005286626,0.00030975754,0.0075689303,0.000007891926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6124321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7956974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38756788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038561605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031529404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7797007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605085003","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.29.1.182","title":"“Bringing Canadian Women on Board”: A Behavioural Economics Perspective on Whether Public Reporting of Gender Diversity Will Alter the Male-Dominated Composition of Canadian Public Company Boards and Senior Management","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Corporate governance; Accounting; Context (archaeology); Public disclosure; Issuer; Gender diversity; Senior management; Corporate law; Dismissal; Public relations; Business; Political science; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.10844303614752875,"score_gpt":0.27578280301380914,"score_spread":0.16733976686628038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605085003","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44800013,0.0043077786,0.009914808,0.19029346,0.0004594911,0.0003546711,0.00082654547,0.000052674455,0.34579048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98047113,0.0012748719,0.00125712,0.0069480566,0.00005558315,0.000033473218,0.00006031279,0.000007474271,0.0098919105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894232,0.003426193,0.00012481169,0.00074202445,0.0040605254,0.0022232432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98833674,0.004354078,0.0021397304,0.00068461284,0.0032583242,0.0012265468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010458081,0.00032662475,0.00034847963,0.0017860263,0.009361898,0.0065334965,0.0017947725,0.0018929149,0.005349659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02409247,0.0001953032,0.00041983696,0.0021494585,0.012245121,0.00280603,0.002050604,0.0019832435,0.00024086713],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014852843,0.00018300295,0.113493994,0.00023858412,0.00008748923,0.00038156568,0.0494475,0.0016907606,0.0013516375,0.72164625,0.02927458,0.08205617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011666603,0.00029952358,0.37224436,0.00107063,0.0002479404,0.0002518619,0.14754537,0.006076614,0.0034921442,0.16465288,0.30355167,0.00045026297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9462713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9590073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05740447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05740447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058213342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41650057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605096447","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.29.1.36","title":"Why Doesn't She Just Report It? Apprehensions and Contradictions for Women Who Report Sexual Violence to the Police","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Criminology; Criminal justice; Psychology; Skepticism; Economic Justice; Sexual violence; Social psychology; Political science; Suicide prevention; Law; Poison control; Medicine; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.05930228821257924,"score_gpt":0.33541096490479133,"score_spread":0.27610867669221206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605096447","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9167042,0.0027401114,0.00070245424,0.06535931,0.00039356604,0.000062513536,0.00008169929,0.000027314782,0.013928918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902524,0.0022261431,0.00032050838,0.0046473644,0.00009711415,0.000031723368,0.000038496062,0.00002071252,0.0023655568],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98826677,0.0062871086,0.00043426704,0.00041214706,0.002659257,0.0019405287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98853976,0.004650756,0.0029914891,0.0006026911,0.0017625279,0.0014527618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010701574,0.0004772193,0.000662341,0.0022789196,0.019523013,0.009611817,0.0018430497,0.0022935704,0.0016998774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03575822,0.0008764939,0.000505221,0.001997284,0.018660184,0.00465933,0.0067175305,0.005851647,0.00030506347],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001835381,0.000015920887,0.023254173,0.00004274341,0.000013514368,0.0012504525,0.962943,0.000014125384,0.00021602029,0.0019678317,0.0022952307,0.00796867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016183365,0.000011306394,0.00583337,0.00009520807,0.000007656427,0.0004093654,0.9865665,0.000017096405,0.00006771394,0.00036716135,0.0066075125,0.000015406451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31191579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3688877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68808424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013109027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019654393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62020046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2744029610","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.26.2.02","title":"Eloquent (In)action: Enforcement and Prosecutorial Restraint in the Transnational Trade in Human Eggs As Deep Ambivalence about the Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Geographies of human-animal interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ambivalence; Action (physics); Enforcement; Political science; Law; Free trade; International trade; Law and economics; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.031206426406557842,"score_gpt":0.31436770649925794,"score_spread":0.2831612800927001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2744029610","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17249638,0.0030472884,0.01086851,0.11615898,0.00067569275,0.000071681694,0.00006470315,0.00007841493,0.69653827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9564218,0.0006300102,0.0008507994,0.013003104,0.000076814285,0.000014226489,0.000017692206,0.00004364184,0.028941983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896512,0.0028923773,0.0002667414,0.0014514772,0.003262104,0.0024760277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907148,0.003910319,0.000877596,0.00074009673,0.0030837632,0.00067335414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008138169,0.00036522336,0.00037464575,0.0012383042,0.024761286,0.014653944,0.0026081002,0.006595559,0.004590568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01939514,0.00040960283,0.000387101,0.0012988712,0.04925839,0.004655512,0.005450174,0.010190732,0.0004736301],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018851362,0.000015675498,0.0029396466,0.00004406863,0.000012835152,0.00044572266,0.13953558,0.00020443057,0.0004645518,0.8313997,0.010470129,0.014448874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003707676,0.00005892258,0.013093198,0.00079589075,0.00013855373,0.00057942944,0.22360837,0.0016266649,0.0028685885,0.1894706,0.56752425,0.00019841643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8256265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81429327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17437351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03379034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045526024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3508008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2764441751","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.24.1.135","title":"Cashing in on Cachet? Ethnicity and Gender in the Strip Club","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Emotional Labor in Professions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.09357365522868774,"score_gpt":0.3313041764939929,"score_spread":0.23773052126530517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2764441751","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96794844,0.00081574736,0.00004192529,0.0044969814,0.000098177356,0.000006897295,0.00004429207,0.0000023089256,0.02654521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99103785,0.00027268057,0.00001504502,0.0004051381,0.000032298605,0.0000074089603,0.000012031126,0.0000054374004,0.008212266],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998669,0.0006026915,0.000037105594,0.00008300822,0.00020186134,0.0004062542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99732035,0.0006977921,0.0005381199,0.00008111202,0.00022680109,0.001135775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019294848,0.00014043042,0.00037125198,0.0010428166,0.005475464,0.005661865,0.0007339467,0.0010837528,0.017140586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047709458,0.00016578536,0.00019382004,0.0012097768,0.0033985951,0.0027083703,0.0022125167,0.0012787678,0.0010504964],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041390906,0.00033213946,0.36217558,0.000088697525,0.000030303727,0.0013240727,0.55921316,0.000069221,0.00036863668,0.030907547,0.00915346,0.035923332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011882819,0.00007445456,0.18049651,0.00020542923,0.000009766779,0.00025628918,0.8023878,0.000093777126,0.0000671568,0.0019559646,0.014416397,0.000024618252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035831597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07517635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035831597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017538762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016378406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07124609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769949280","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.29.2.227","title":"Refugee Claims and Criminalization of Same-Sex Intimacy: The Case of <i>Sebastiao</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Persecution; Law; Sexual orientation; Political science; Appeal; Criminology; Immigration; Criminalization; Sociology; Gender studies; Politics","score_opus":0.037739050162414245,"score_gpt":0.2942526103547262,"score_spread":0.256513560192312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769949280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6301628,0.0098563265,0.0006146238,0.11706951,0.00091787556,0.00008108799,0.000043672993,0.000013730696,0.24124035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97335917,0.0026904063,0.00021036266,0.012246357,0.00019628012,0.000035998863,0.00001528935,0.000008815493,0.011237246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99624336,0.0008528344,0.000118567936,0.0001930927,0.0004677242,0.0021244797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99762326,0.0012163555,0.00035329704,0.000117141826,0.0002018285,0.00048811256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003990013,0.00035803125,0.0005210993,0.0018728167,0.028401583,0.008189924,0.0014343098,0.010460643,0.0025819207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070345714,0.00045903845,0.00068443705,0.0013015455,0.025955081,0.0029755589,0.008103939,0.012271026,0.00023147468],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000597236,0.0001548935,0.022917597,0.000120416466,0.000021762962,0.034808904,0.23722541,0.00019405852,0.00053134846,0.671191,0.018860027,0.013914808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008580269,0.00010050828,0.02883502,0.0027607838,0.00009924888,0.024275212,0.54615927,0.00066359265,0.0019035724,0.06100682,0.33391976,0.00019032764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21254675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33749747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78745323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01231978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015479372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42261922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770192177","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.29.2.317","title":"Quand le droit international des droits de l'Homme et le droit canadien des réfugiés LGBTQ+ convergent","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Ethnology; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.04795517911316034,"score_gpt":0.2777231812338096,"score_spread":0.2297680021206493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770192177","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3554291,0.009042697,0.0018264728,0.037695885,0.0003711179,0.00004847161,0.0006146527,0.000018026942,0.5949536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9422152,0.0049822526,0.0007294697,0.0030933444,0.00011161009,0.00007771425,0.00017311485,0.000017681947,0.04859958],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975139,0.00067494094,0.00006609575,0.00026557676,0.00058623357,0.0008932974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978765,0.0007898245,0.0005341774,0.00011726658,0.0003764847,0.00030562255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020327033,0.0002383871,0.00028996338,0.001528296,0.0033627509,0.004214649,0.00048973714,0.0013284317,0.010974126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057131727,0.00017899588,0.00022531212,0.0025195745,0.005198339,0.0025454948,0.0026850621,0.0020106598,0.00065203366],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068686066,0.000036432404,0.04716917,0.00013843496,0.00003427728,0.0003745846,0.042756595,0.00022214207,0.0004781769,0.8730152,0.00589259,0.029813692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048691432,0.00018650922,0.30106378,0.0017857451,0.00008611429,0.00088280614,0.13785817,0.0003753449,0.0010327977,0.08650935,0.47005072,0.000120001416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16231336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28985226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83768666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053793276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008113476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32273716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770498450","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.29.2.290","title":"Denying Refugee Protection to LGBTQ and Marginalized Persons: A Retrospective Look at State Protection in Canadian Refugee Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Refugee law; Due diligence; Law; Plaintiff; Political science; State (computer science); International law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.028001999583379646,"score_gpt":0.2742457999350268,"score_spread":0.24624380035164714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770498450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82146335,0.010497966,0.000537885,0.035932265,0.0002944783,0.00034952225,0.0015256361,0.000033098982,0.12936586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96705484,0.008638743,0.00040445325,0.0051246523,0.000049692007,0.000073213094,0.00043126746,0.00003202491,0.018191136],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99397886,0.0008457194,0.00019272583,0.00034370107,0.0020527798,0.0025862865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900594,0.0024836771,0.00092250534,0.00029002546,0.005165499,0.0010789193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062840423,0.00038685088,0.00050261617,0.0073415437,0.034130823,0.006519055,0.0023651156,0.0027248168,0.003527962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01776588,0.00066415477,0.00043638767,0.008924338,0.012925502,0.0021768948,0.005348573,0.00510635,0.00022283454],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007726606,0.00008742509,0.07935779,0.0004822019,0.000023526778,0.002077045,0.77818334,0.00019547484,0.000630137,0.076128624,0.026257262,0.036499873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009326707,0.00003840326,0.15346552,0.0011546998,0.000052203584,0.00060826127,0.62859154,0.00019881393,0.000416686,0.001416481,0.2139092,0.00013890295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99655235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99832636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16182294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16182294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19268484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9721666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770543075","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.29.2.259","title":"Sexual Orientation in Canada's Revised Refugee Determination System: An Empirical Snapshot","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Sexual orientation; Persecution; Appeal; Immigration; Snapshot (computer storage); Political science; Criminology; Law; Sociology; Psychology; Gender studies; Computer science","score_opus":0.03385908834119809,"score_gpt":0.31231461893346996,"score_spread":0.27845553059227185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770543075","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9467673,0.0048742415,0.00032891857,0.017561432,0.0001483081,0.00024428286,0.0032891452,0.000028287961,0.026758093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98443455,0.0051141405,0.00050872983,0.0035902471,0.000038895327,0.00006452643,0.0014045766,0.000026069842,0.004818306],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99157155,0.001084903,0.0003749968,0.0005431246,0.0037525957,0.0026728637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9677582,0.0060432698,0.003386747,0.0012642442,0.017233917,0.0043136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007516053,0.0002710569,0.0005784715,0.005112366,0.014423051,0.008792343,0.002567917,0.0014393972,0.002673137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020467551,0.00060621754,0.0004078658,0.012202262,0.006366242,0.0024780415,0.0048424886,0.0035884313,0.00024453943],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012630274,0.0003248636,0.6692222,0.0004592691,0.000074381795,0.0009537219,0.19768286,0.00029334513,0.0003318513,0.019566368,0.034428164,0.07653674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009947346,0.00005285508,0.68272424,0.0007654746,0.0000338318,0.0001722767,0.264172,0.00029010585,0.00017891356,0.00039537824,0.051119864,0.000085146785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99570906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99811256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88437617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11562383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19847322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83891356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789407380","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.30.1.144","title":"Locating Oneself in One's Research: Learning and Engaging with Law in the Coast Salish World","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Context (archaeology); Operationalization; Law; Sociology; Political science; Indigenous rights; Commission; Legal education; Human rights; Geography; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06969613477776965,"score_gpt":0.3153607896416976,"score_spread":0.24566465486392797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789407380","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8307863,0.0055663823,0.0038962215,0.08295056,0.00057030935,0.00028821113,0.000054544642,0.0001423317,0.07574504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9646724,0.0047526252,0.0054533724,0.007966786,0.00011652936,0.0002014242,0.00004998481,0.000097534,0.016689405],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864792,0.009824561,0.00022827172,0.0005738822,0.0011568473,0.0017372565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871372,0.006997764,0.000904258,0.00050704274,0.0008087933,0.0036449747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014964978,0.0007565118,0.0006915643,0.0023533157,0.045019004,0.013132792,0.0038826833,0.0041233636,0.0053345123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015314103,0.0007483328,0.00038672643,0.002113855,0.05908542,0.009580479,0.018978907,0.007297964,0.00071944593],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001976986,0.000013467488,0.00047099244,0.000025268839,0.0000011634888,0.00025534374,0.9929202,0.0000063076977,0.00013639507,0.0018524943,0.0011054842,0.0032108712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001621038,0.00000930035,0.0005596324,0.000063390195,0.000002245263,0.00009602794,0.9832723,0.000017029104,0.000040460454,0.0009386529,0.014991466,0.000007871974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18174887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4079983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81825113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015038977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023224503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36138195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790146862","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.30.1.42","title":"Debunking the Myth of “Not My Bad”: Sexual Images, Consent, and Online Host Responsibilities in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wrongdoing; Liability; Amateur; Anonymity; Business; Internet privacy; Pornography; Child pornography; Business model; Advertising; Public relations; Law; The Internet; Marketing; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.045810072597117106,"score_gpt":0.3004491261751099,"score_spread":0.25463905357799277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790146862","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8896921,0.0026149538,0.0008645666,0.03439926,0.00014428791,0.00014838164,0.00058528467,0.000030375271,0.07152088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848118,0.0015255439,0.0002760582,0.0024644358,0.000015848025,0.000017083521,0.00012501795,0.000021829535,0.010742457],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939235,0.00071840716,0.00018621013,0.0004282774,0.0020459369,0.0026976739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98452234,0.0032201235,0.0017774707,0.000438416,0.0047880304,0.00525364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00330343,0.00029564943,0.0005664447,0.0017485305,0.027069503,0.008582848,0.002347564,0.0018952677,0.00640113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013810983,0.0005760792,0.00047915673,0.0034581313,0.011990459,0.0026044026,0.0057778903,0.005551807,0.00027567966],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039556698,0.0006291697,0.45912385,0.00029750293,0.00009611471,0.0041173417,0.2582203,0.0009757956,0.0009357835,0.13333118,0.040171847,0.1017056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006419402,0.0001048411,0.37919578,0.00073198456,0.000113503476,0.0012112904,0.48357224,0.0023501841,0.00087343797,0.008843683,0.12259824,0.0003405892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99822026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13660736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13660736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26638514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99116045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885119136","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.30.2.01","title":"<i>Reference re: Andrews v Law Society of British Columbia</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Charter; Appeal; Supreme court; Section (typography); Context (archaeology); Interpretation (philosophy); Meaning (existential); Political science; High Court; Sociology; Constitutional court; Common law; Constitution; Epistemology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0358771769568436,"score_gpt":0.2644654530922324,"score_spread":0.2285882761353888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885119136","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0078446735,0.018181125,0.0005679905,0.19846225,0.006827488,0.00020562572,0.0042007095,0.00020824293,0.7635018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08995825,0.00872012,0.00072427274,0.28492385,0.0015643158,0.00024247145,0.0014420529,0.00012846773,0.6122962],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945056,0.00047841354,0.00021525346,0.0006482921,0.0023056783,0.0018467621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997593,0.00070922816,0.00014334777,0.000109386754,0.0011693373,0.00027575434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015639188,0.0011575883,0.000663458,0.002967409,0.021927588,0.0097167455,0.003957916,0.021257699,0.020759262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060204244,0.0006564626,0.00077332224,0.004914895,0.0057895053,0.003045354,0.001818793,0.009428675,0.0043636416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020415022,0.000019753095,0.0008064063,0.00012246399,0.0000104237415,0.00035633869,0.00376437,0.000110354995,0.00024769327,0.10758196,0.8810881,0.005871598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013498813,0.000018596607,0.008597448,0.00044554143,0.00002834149,0.000119195196,0.004261437,0.00010563161,0.00033190238,0.0064094393,0.97957224,0.00009657491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9742681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9892328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052032687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052032687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051682636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37752533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885762484","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.30.2.06","title":"<i>R v JA</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Harm; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Criminal code; Law; Human sexuality; Sexual violence; Political science; Sociology; Sexual assault; Criminal law; Criminology; Psychology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; History","score_opus":0.04925315714559517,"score_gpt":0.30131871353574796,"score_spread":0.2520655563901528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885762484","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012636169,0.004429334,0.0023157245,0.23390381,0.010106232,0.00039156602,0.0019658715,0.0006257974,0.7336255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1085205,0.0016642984,0.0027587235,0.5754441,0.0021228637,0.00029350692,0.0004440239,0.00019787303,0.30855396],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911607,0.0006074832,0.000412404,0.0008968315,0.0033171838,0.0036054936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99530905,0.0014431805,0.00022167555,0.00019609966,0.0021827535,0.0006472563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035387455,0.0006973762,0.00075626525,0.0013708195,0.016636768,0.011141107,0.0043891827,0.02344478,0.010564222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010212819,0.0009685972,0.002045575,0.0010434983,0.0075658513,0.0020313032,0.0024411122,0.013355193,0.004441136],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000504824,0.00003907743,0.0010446857,0.00010325443,0.00001878691,0.0005408309,0.0026503308,0.00016772753,0.0008333307,0.26848102,0.7189751,0.0070953085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029062841,0.000057645604,0.0039087036,0.00039115638,0.00006646152,0.0002966129,0.0031389096,0.00038306156,0.0009484473,0.0124091655,0.9782088,0.00016192338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.874513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9361822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12548703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024714531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04624565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25245208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886839932","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.30.2.03","title":"<i>R v Kapp</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Supreme court; Charter; Affirmative action; Law; Deference; Government (linguistics); Political science; Respondent; Disadvantaged; Equal Protection Clause; Section (typography); Law and economics; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.03053588415474346,"score_gpt":0.27633408401553355,"score_spread":0.2457981998607901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886839932","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006356929,0.004707475,0.0028697785,0.23943278,0.0070968177,0.00038118387,0.0015618108,0.00074773846,0.73684555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06732186,0.0016466705,0.003291534,0.6792809,0.0016684866,0.00036328135,0.00040533114,0.0001919704,0.24583001],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887627,0.0011674231,0.0005195215,0.0014612029,0.0048291166,0.003259974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99364495,0.0027021195,0.00024951893,0.00036092242,0.0024993154,0.0005430585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067825657,0.00067606574,0.00075542426,0.001047918,0.011680233,0.010602719,0.0038158535,0.023685897,0.014849476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020144887,0.0010040279,0.0012988417,0.0009859382,0.007007571,0.002877553,0.003655745,0.017165603,0.006686387],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000298183,0.000016809754,0.0004299656,0.000081569364,0.000013103878,0.00034573727,0.0011857888,0.000110504785,0.00038298374,0.2900734,0.70028436,0.0070460443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021266153,0.000031089017,0.0019115233,0.00033347902,0.000035915546,0.00022509278,0.0011241675,0.0002634077,0.0008117889,0.018104373,0.97702926,0.000108615895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5616762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6656745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4383238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015738416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035774287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88181037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887193794","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.30.2.05","title":"<i>Alberta v Hutterian Brethren of Wilson Colony</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Supreme court; Law; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); High Court; Political science; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.0246152067378612,"score_gpt":0.27130976404522505,"score_spread":0.24669455730736387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887193794","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026378863,0.0040518604,0.0005612433,0.057072576,0.0018927333,0.00016022225,0.00033444734,0.00010835701,0.9094397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.282644,0.002189441,0.001103146,0.14726752,0.00029823455,0.00011724446,0.00020773953,0.00008309423,0.56608963],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971933,0.00022054494,0.00004991482,0.00024598333,0.001000561,0.0012896721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993754,0.00017214284,0.00003859245,0.000028988607,0.00022231732,0.00016260523],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012998205,0.00037252423,0.00024195468,0.0006265112,0.017099649,0.0053210533,0.001974291,0.0073714023,0.010887041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024779001,0.00043250876,0.00042050064,0.0007696955,0.004804002,0.001139172,0.0019911362,0.0060939332,0.0011073289],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039946517,0.000026636902,0.002818804,0.00009294064,0.000012575437,0.0016847876,0.015049342,0.000110052526,0.0010621409,0.43421665,0.5244916,0.020394433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011479969,0.000022931392,0.0070124767,0.00017237477,0.000021010499,0.00031459317,0.01040021,0.00008861541,0.00049009133,0.0047092927,0.97670525,0.000051695417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9318671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9762498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06813288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01891206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0321959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13721728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887699319","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.30.2.04","title":"<i>R v Kapp</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Prima facie; Jurisprudence; Doctrine; Section (typography); Argument (complex analysis); Indigenous; Political science; Race (biology); Sociology; Gender studies; Business","score_opus":0.022998339544274767,"score_gpt":0.2750613597648385,"score_spread":0.2520630202205637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887699319","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012136901,0.0027348178,0.003077879,0.13298135,0.0049901675,0.00041017355,0.0029108124,0.0008405991,0.83991736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10198784,0.00106452,0.0034400718,0.50856346,0.0012280426,0.00039755128,0.0008131979,0.00022838335,0.3822769],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99132043,0.00042393935,0.00021220227,0.0008122235,0.0036653467,0.003565885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99651754,0.0008090603,0.00013595678,0.00015902176,0.0020126211,0.0003659147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026590428,0.00059497735,0.0007427764,0.0012119423,0.012420404,0.0120698195,0.00450743,0.016258819,0.013482513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0078567285,0.0010013421,0.0017116023,0.0013224235,0.0060210587,0.0017291205,0.002750357,0.013490762,0.004728643],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035916375,0.000027554144,0.0008531734,0.000088668676,0.000020385394,0.00052610686,0.0016700374,0.00031739243,0.00059774524,0.39207727,0.59571254,0.0080732675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000323698,0.000029966764,0.0037871448,0.00027644154,0.00005631504,0.0002487605,0.0018928925,0.00076629367,0.00088652124,0.017098121,0.9747737,0.00015148528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9161821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9439465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9161821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032714557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0630302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23736185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887797623","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.30.2.02","title":"<i>R v Kapp</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Section (typography); Scrutiny; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Test (biology); Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.041675184801869596,"score_gpt":0.2988952863265031,"score_spread":0.2572201015246335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887797623","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010514795,0.0029306002,0.002773483,0.22499678,0.007923461,0.00034339353,0.002364923,0.00078563736,0.74736696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.077352054,0.0013088434,0.0033396152,0.53824645,0.0012244567,0.00027091184,0.0006235308,0.00022774762,0.37740633],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914453,0.00047435035,0.00021944083,0.00079166464,0.003933951,0.0031352271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968076,0.0007633842,0.000115058785,0.00011985234,0.0018204276,0.00037374557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026946792,0.0006286885,0.00068736,0.0012046305,0.013937743,0.010114955,0.0046974737,0.016607026,0.013270996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009381315,0.00096911,0.0017659602,0.0012957206,0.0059816763,0.0021460075,0.002519457,0.014111763,0.004905755],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023821567,0.000017562896,0.00047767768,0.000062315594,0.000010775812,0.00032147404,0.0013820257,0.00020129075,0.0003667522,0.21514611,0.77533203,0.006658197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021714455,0.000022591008,0.003207159,0.00025438258,0.000044769116,0.00016968709,0.0024265558,0.00054796715,0.0006624124,0.012191399,0.9803248,0.00012654395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92400813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9652928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92400813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036300965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.074274704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26338315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904010990","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.30.3.007","title":"Feeling Property: Settler Violence in the Time of Reconciliation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Subjectivity; Scholarship; Property (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Sociology; Power (physics); Psychic; Criminology; Identity (music); Colonialism; Ideology; White (mutation); Feeling; Gender studies; Political science; Law; Geography; Aesthetics; Social psychology; Psychology; Politics; Epistemology; Archaeology; Ecology; Art","score_opus":0.022140968093445946,"score_gpt":0.26470958784833676,"score_spread":0.2425686197548908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904010990","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6523692,0.0034994544,0.005845128,0.09037321,0.00093648775,0.00007179517,0.00004364808,0.0000616803,0.24679942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99397594,0.00026359883,0.00031221748,0.0018678389,0.00006975222,0.000014680871,0.0000079558295,0.000011398916,0.0034766672],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99226415,0.00445672,0.00014491497,0.00052495796,0.0009132424,0.0016959495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971938,0.00093785435,0.00056625885,0.00025778575,0.00040609227,0.00063827174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044009234,0.0003013702,0.00043089685,0.0010155399,0.030852862,0.009919306,0.0018206335,0.005835619,0.0033051074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011434466,0.00031615104,0.0003742786,0.0009214419,0.046653118,0.006036268,0.010584097,0.008258384,0.00025102973],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013581969,0.000023424744,0.002028288,0.000019301535,0.000008583369,0.0017505575,0.8488232,0.00004161318,0.00019667072,0.139844,0.0030849148,0.004165873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009938692,0.000027753696,0.0034363437,0.00011619269,0.000010844505,0.001080029,0.90472347,0.00016381874,0.00018914767,0.02244665,0.067764185,0.00003169499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07651192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.102304876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9234881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008370485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055981614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15213317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904371036","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.30.3.005","title":"Still Making Canada White: Racial Governmentality and the “Good Immigrant” in Canadian Parliamentary Immigration Debates","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Parliament; Political science; Immigration law; Refugee; Immigration policy; Politics; Law; Racism; Immigration reform; Hegemony; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.010040770440507423,"score_gpt":0.24181742631852723,"score_spread":0.23177665587801982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904371036","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41012883,0.010289824,0.00082322536,0.2657566,0.001332695,0.000044405584,0.00010829386,0.000044220065,0.31147197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96814,0.0016218078,0.00020648172,0.016596518,0.00008963415,0.00001344654,0.000018823132,0.000027001155,0.0132862795],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.990666,0.0024141576,0.00012343163,0.00060414063,0.002004816,0.0041875243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932766,0.002326932,0.00043590443,0.00016645216,0.0016044496,0.0021898125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008536497,0.0005103576,0.0005240738,0.0021939927,0.09990561,0.017742822,0.0024700065,0.005839623,0.004582752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010931929,0.00044568678,0.00040697638,0.003149991,0.04993015,0.0038162337,0.007148523,0.008536554,0.0003257329],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051238447,0.000024836962,0.005053127,0.00006223632,0.000014752536,0.00074729754,0.6902876,0.00014311603,0.0003709083,0.25902626,0.031816043,0.012402628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017677508,0.000015964299,0.01042058,0.00030775205,0.000034264725,0.00014962179,0.668049,0.00022223806,0.00037070582,0.011315775,0.3089731,0.00012341532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9879887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9928933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8246935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17530651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15454939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95652753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904925197","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.30.3.006","title":"Minimizing and Denying Racial Violence: Insights from the Québec Mosque Shooting","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Mythology; Scholarship; White (mutation); Sociology; Criminology; Race (biology); Gender studies; Political science; Law; History","score_opus":0.06809946995583482,"score_gpt":0.32325302231798314,"score_spread":0.2551535523621483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904925197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74043566,0.0050315317,0.0015724706,0.061763845,0.00056289166,0.00012299651,0.00029551555,0.000044949877,0.19017015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97125536,0.0020443697,0.00041346226,0.0064687943,0.00007420733,0.00002929709,0.0000721289,0.00003940595,0.019603038],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956434,0.0019069244,0.000046934696,0.000248858,0.0006298254,0.0015241603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957093,0.0017378953,0.00041512575,0.00015409612,0.0011338581,0.0008497722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032949708,0.0007069925,0.0004847056,0.002029194,0.05265853,0.00901794,0.0030551795,0.0050000544,0.00535355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067735193,0.00038774015,0.00033310277,0.0021915794,0.021654382,0.0032764957,0.004088598,0.0063590254,0.00055770593],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033758268,0.000078486446,0.00730211,0.000079020356,0.000017337012,0.0011903038,0.9429267,0.00015284611,0.00040047994,0.018740864,0.017196896,0.011881177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042359156,0.000015325448,0.0071238,0.00015968832,0.000007911227,0.00014560044,0.93110305,0.00010695436,0.00012235393,0.0011652241,0.06002299,0.000022912796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96122116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98783445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056627747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.056627747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041392542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.410865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904997941","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.30.3.008","title":"Ethics of Accountability: <i>Gladue</i>, Race, and the Limits of Reparative Justice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Accountability; Economic Justice; Race (biology); Criminal justice; Set (abstract data type); Criminology; Sociology; Law; Political science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.05210967274313985,"score_gpt":0.33790925425338103,"score_spread":0.2857995815102412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904997941","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21036457,0.0045971656,0.011761297,0.23732789,0.00046846233,0.00006849008,0.000062743675,0.0000476064,0.53530174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98463917,0.0005502746,0.00077151356,0.004284999,0.000053019052,0.000025498497,0.0000059391573,0.000019772795,0.009649812],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99039793,0.004936034,0.00015055602,0.0005316134,0.0017035147,0.0022803708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952396,0.0020754058,0.00069941714,0.0003218879,0.0010168505,0.0006467854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066759223,0.00022438684,0.00027045107,0.001006683,0.02197822,0.012059306,0.0014616937,0.003070673,0.0021997667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011202349,0.0002488863,0.0002359839,0.0009913694,0.0702007,0.0054106195,0.005564925,0.00577734,0.00019214906],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000087454655,0.000011438131,0.0016248013,0.00002309306,0.0000023603827,0.00014792623,0.09858763,0.00007733942,0.00012342796,0.88946027,0.004566565,0.0053665177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018597846,0.000024545014,0.01326828,0.00075946754,0.000025948371,0.0003420726,0.23450738,0.0009206869,0.00080434344,0.39793336,0.35130122,0.000094175484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72643757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7788101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27356243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046516493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.061399385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.550347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905201652","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.30.3.002","title":"Race, Space, and Prostitution: The Making of Settler Colonial Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Indigenous; Legitimation; Race (biology); Making-of; Gender studies; Normalization (sociology); Sociology; State (computer science); Criminology; Political science; Ethnology; Law; Anthropology; Politics","score_opus":0.01315633658383079,"score_gpt":0.2296324466290228,"score_spread":0.21647611004519202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905201652","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71665096,0.01068668,0.0010195429,0.03340629,0.0003570854,0.00007458986,0.00031987324,0.000029949533,0.237455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808302,0.0033674615,0.00032138775,0.0009826547,0.00002369307,0.00001524991,0.000049717044,0.000027331664,0.014382223],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99713445,0.00054101273,0.00004895737,0.00024025905,0.0007084,0.0013267947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980564,0.000484422,0.00014837562,0.00008745692,0.000685544,0.00053777156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022412892,0.00031058386,0.0005458286,0.00273356,0.048410393,0.011571378,0.002017869,0.0013837465,0.00639925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056889975,0.00037437835,0.00025856297,0.006036471,0.028136892,0.002221083,0.007616375,0.0028665697,0.00019294034],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004874467,0.000028064173,0.025903387,0.000124304,0.000021929329,0.0012784534,0.73780143,0.00031542763,0.000320164,0.17866227,0.0115698725,0.043925952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007118081,0.00001437719,0.03327684,0.00037835859,0.000028777442,0.00021969722,0.77644444,0.00017947811,0.0002073211,0.005654981,0.18352659,0.00006199493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9961159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99847656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.120279305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.120279305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1408071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8726915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905478810","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.30.3.009","title":"“Making It Right,” Keeping It White: Race and the Demand for Queer Redress","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"African Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intersectionality; Queer; Redress; Scholarship; Politics; Racism; Inclusion (mineral); Gender studies; Sociology; Lesbian; White (mutation); Transgender; Political science; Oppression; Subordination (linguistics); Race (biology); Law","score_opus":0.0469775425461275,"score_gpt":0.31816381070333316,"score_spread":0.27118626815720565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905478810","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15791576,0.003679476,0.0013978321,0.5216739,0.0010489647,0.000027981247,0.000078830286,0.00003586783,0.3141414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88769436,0.0016965457,0.00043082217,0.06066694,0.00033408066,0.000042074786,0.000025109728,0.00008219669,0.049027786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928294,0.0037877841,0.00013012378,0.0004651338,0.0010061004,0.0017814882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859282,0.007586958,0.00152806,0.0005991592,0.0012738497,0.0030838442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076271417,0.00014484319,0.00027245836,0.00063140166,0.02473665,0.010310266,0.0010720147,0.0037450932,0.019301025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020856075,0.00030409533,0.0002779724,0.0010882263,0.026215278,0.008404564,0.0056525115,0.009204855,0.0009721132],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004996224,0.000046050634,0.0065688873,0.00005096806,0.000009936294,0.00059263565,0.24796948,0.00006656865,0.00031957583,0.6405693,0.068952754,0.034803864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030792045,0.000029987381,0.009160357,0.0004806694,0.000016155578,0.00036444972,0.39867827,0.00013744413,0.0003514252,0.051526714,0.53915715,0.00006661594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2498218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46412808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7501782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010739807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015218513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49673533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970564397","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.31.2.05","title":"The <i>Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines</i>, Soft Law, and the Procedural Rule of Law","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Law; Art","score_opus":0.029884460921857023,"score_gpt":0.277993477525192,"score_spread":0.24810901660333495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970564397","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029376173,0.0067540486,0.020650022,0.08855018,0.002150645,0.00011365622,0.00042244841,0.00021878975,0.851764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6546489,0.0049804673,0.01392879,0.05464733,0.001829964,0.00030769611,0.00034085594,0.00019442142,0.2691216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895326,0.0031826175,0.00081279775,0.0011531503,0.0036189707,0.001699966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838526,0.008619408,0.0020185243,0.0020828345,0.002603347,0.0008232135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0078344215,0.0003735233,0.00031485883,0.0018279221,0.0060254144,0.010460045,0.0017664202,0.006658799,0.014713039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023527041,0.00061513024,0.0007377203,0.0018130919,0.0146840345,0.0055980813,0.0038801709,0.008820567,0.0031655126],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010316194,0.000011346515,0.00067412254,0.00004323897,0.000003930667,0.000045724628,0.002419653,0.0000700308,0.000116265786,0.9637387,0.022648728,0.0102179535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027344213,0.000047049216,0.006897209,0.00078242505,0.000028766477,0.00019307846,0.003545953,0.00065056555,0.0008649974,0.22333913,0.76354736,0.000076141805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051273722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08012306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9487263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006822749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015133421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.101950586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989790847","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.31.2.01","title":"The Merits of Restricting Provocation to Indictable Offences: A Critical Analysis of Provocation Law Reform in Canada and New South Wales, Australia","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.043302588606323224,"score_gpt":0.295496901347456,"score_spread":0.25219431274113274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989790847","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8817256,0.0065302844,0.0007664827,0.025001073,0.00018266204,0.0004280215,0.0001534693,0.000019659323,0.085192755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877286,0.0020072472,0.00037488388,0.0024261312,0.00002803254,0.00011185238,0.00004837855,0.0000104789815,0.0072643096],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9833423,0.0033081986,0.0004649402,0.0008517623,0.0049579176,0.0070748664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96926886,0.00893597,0.002124434,0.0007138383,0.01471481,0.00424221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01005909,0.00037455506,0.00078030425,0.005876582,0.016551282,0.0089251865,0.0030964273,0.0025213978,0.0022614617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040244572,0.0005389343,0.0005478933,0.005847906,0.015939917,0.0023918562,0.005804062,0.0042104386,0.00011477215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027317984,0.0002195357,0.14329071,0.0010793868,0.0002180039,0.0021387613,0.50832635,0.0024971718,0.001106304,0.24113472,0.01447126,0.085244715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007031072,0.00018527817,0.39283565,0.0012694909,0.00024544177,0.00020216791,0.4721957,0.0018579955,0.0007419309,0.007331369,0.12286443,0.00020022682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99187636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9949309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2457104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2457104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31964806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.874869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990208315","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.31.2.06","title":"Toxic Conceptions: The Assessment and Regulation of Male-Mediated Transgenerational Effects of Chemical Exposures","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Ethnology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.009383315466052249,"score_gpt":0.2735271704254171,"score_spread":0.2641438549593648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990208315","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9567585,0.0064514894,0.016628657,0.00085985655,0.00013146196,0.00018239628,0.0006883879,0.0001112763,0.018187923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97618616,0.004284884,0.0064697256,0.00035258595,0.00003725835,0.00019890163,0.00031666877,0.00004048546,0.01211339],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980678,0.00066103233,0.000057030455,0.00036490636,0.0007540218,0.00009534669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983865,0.0004922766,0.00045141845,0.00022822188,0.00029441054,0.0001471371],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022085789,0.00037265886,0.00028386386,0.0011761832,0.0005737916,0.0010592762,0.000496398,0.00058899884,0.0026031258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002320242,0.00027758096,0.0003657411,0.00045029412,0.0011658225,0.0005225659,0.000929188,0.0008078842,0.00027609235],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013851724,0.0004411459,0.07785283,0.0008861826,0.00019594745,0.0004024432,0.0044580847,0.0008190501,0.80022925,0.012145926,0.00087054993,0.10031347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044076445,0.0063843774,0.39925128,0.00017962852,0.00027182422,0.0015575427,0.0032035045,0.0020251803,0.5572169,0.005500789,0.0242426,0.00012224872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002996854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038508156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002996854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011751133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009983815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011680186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990477602","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.31.2.03","title":"The “Statutory Rape” Myth: A Case Law Study of Sexual Assaults against Adolescent Girls","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Tribunal; Political science; Art; Law","score_opus":0.03593079952204512,"score_gpt":0.28595120987275197,"score_spread":0.2500204103507068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990477602","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9773735,0.0031156747,0.000620029,0.0050850445,0.000081849255,0.00014251245,0.000061842235,0.000004406999,0.0135152545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935952,0.0033157298,0.00026218317,0.0009669023,0.000052524563,0.00008799272,0.000024688066,0.00000634172,0.0016885977],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936061,0.0042726328,0.00033945026,0.00034790646,0.0007643497,0.0006695653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883223,0.008339291,0.0021122957,0.00044148872,0.00038640166,0.00039816144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055281874,0.00037722234,0.00053905864,0.0024115155,0.008800613,0.003585595,0.0013388615,0.0030450441,0.0025811153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017518468,0.00063707674,0.00042053635,0.0021112815,0.009584004,0.0039418293,0.0042259595,0.0040113754,0.00030430444],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006172744,0.0004236621,0.15076883,0.00037825448,0.000045478562,0.050378673,0.71835744,0.00018242172,0.0005230945,0.060089562,0.00281984,0.01597101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016503844,0.00017840271,0.05153185,0.0010122008,0.00003622004,0.039788984,0.87399894,0.0002767124,0.00052892516,0.0029962522,0.029590884,0.000044042197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024878979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041641448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.975121,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004082141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034213886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04946834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990965028","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.31.2.02","title":"United by the Problem, Divided by the Solution: How the Issue of Indigenous Women in Prostitution Was Represented at the Deliberations on Canada’s Bill C-36","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Ethnology; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.01637661060907061,"score_gpt":0.23196044638827581,"score_spread":0.2155838357792052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990965028","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7002478,0.0049867462,0.0032433518,0.109928265,0.0010014933,0.0001338859,0.0001841841,0.000050813094,0.18022352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97315365,0.0011176412,0.0005127642,0.005471233,0.000085915795,0.000047216952,0.000030791005,0.000071007424,0.01950976],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98725814,0.0071165496,0.00020278808,0.00084901735,0.0017532832,0.002820314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99465805,0.002868736,0.00035117663,0.0002253037,0.0008976371,0.0009990848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010473745,0.00050541415,0.0006028064,0.0018147142,0.051471587,0.015725281,0.0018660467,0.004590914,0.0053443154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011949202,0.000602322,0.00042901642,0.0024259745,0.056021176,0.006450458,0.008706057,0.008623297,0.00048739646],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009159863,0.000004320607,0.0006524417,0.000031468015,0.0000025546756,0.00019479258,0.98186743,0.000021343149,0.00012786048,0.013907551,0.0011538569,0.0020272906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017942046,0.00000410001,0.00090058736,0.00010846998,0.0000047321973,0.000049030114,0.9654719,0.00003208122,0.00008276899,0.0016641917,0.03166704,0.000013333354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7690253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8454942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23097467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039572284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05762552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46466982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991106457","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.31.2.04","title":"Assessing Sexually Harassing Conduct in the Workplace: An Analysis of BC Human Rights Tribunal Decisions in 2010–16","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Hill's Pet Nutrition","keywords":"Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.0868209108119748,"score_gpt":0.3633437076925173,"score_spread":0.2765227968805425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991106457","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99640036,0.00027094444,0.000048836577,0.00038109577,0.000008052976,0.000026303334,0.00008364572,8.884379e-7,0.002779943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960693,0.0003650474,0.000075948985,0.00013811125,0.000007531236,0.00004179703,0.00013907265,0.0000040170726,0.0031592266],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969618,0.0008711291,0.00017772558,0.00017947174,0.0007684319,0.0010415064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941962,0.0011979673,0.0015712038,0.00020777991,0.0018466191,0.0009802489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029007902,0.00017203891,0.00027354975,0.002528825,0.005103548,0.002362833,0.0009460737,0.0008219637,0.0028439953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008122707,0.00038417452,0.00021802574,0.004534446,0.0025139505,0.0011657397,0.0030673104,0.0017876065,0.00057387224],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023466062,0.00031713737,0.66580904,0.00012665596,0.000035288413,0.0008929693,0.2783169,0.00028459937,0.0010630179,0.0019258288,0.0025351131,0.048458852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030633928,0.00005783143,0.80677545,0.00008360415,0.0000035322405,0.00008393081,0.18687667,0.00014805635,0.0001362664,0.00012823197,0.0056866817,0.000016815628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5369785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7658585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46302152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012514743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077898656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9314967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991221444","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.31.2.07","title":"Vulnerable Targets: Trans Prisoner Safety, the Law, and Sexual Violence in the Prison System","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.01493657488181083,"score_gpt":0.24425736384833216,"score_spread":0.22932078896652133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991221444","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99206394,0.0005770199,0.00007626631,0.002464412,0.00001766388,0.00002642597,0.00012185148,0.000002010703,0.0046504145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980375,0.00032954855,0.00004222145,0.00023131068,0.000007771873,0.000015462483,0.000059293598,0.0000014830475,0.0012754438],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987627,0.00038720173,0.000057941368,0.00009353309,0.000276138,0.0004224212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99644,0.00047781307,0.0010271868,0.0000994304,0.0009459991,0.0010095466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015909161,0.00017956873,0.00026907455,0.0015239321,0.0048595844,0.0024734042,0.0008419866,0.0006359078,0.0043628067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005387247,0.00020247954,0.0002349393,0.001684358,0.0028497793,0.0013271435,0.0024319328,0.0013286878,0.00018328372],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010257041,0.00017783155,0.8974723,0.00012348083,0.000045797842,0.00032550815,0.08228045,0.00014503671,0.00033128393,0.003128949,0.0014480288,0.014418775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004340343,0.00007225838,0.88062036,0.00022383203,0.000022932183,0.00009487023,0.11581956,0.00011626048,0.000117081174,0.00034110624,0.0025534877,0.000013911567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8298732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.929807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1701268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011647515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018137973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34225738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3007472026","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.31.2.10","title":"Patricia Cochran, <i>Common Sense and Legal Judgment: Community Knowledge, Political Power, and Rhetorical Practice</i>","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Common sense; Politics; Power (physics); Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.019411038484253018,"score_gpt":0.29228229032161884,"score_spread":0.2728712518373658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3007472026","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001803299,0.26362222,0.0020390737,0.67957085,0.008724309,0.00008031896,0.00016242664,0.00006244167,0.043934975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18876286,0.38676488,0.005634661,0.3209974,0.028542412,0.0006464959,0.0002975704,0.00034639845,0.06800739],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938139,0.0026410704,0.00019950708,0.0006416317,0.0022796826,0.0004242761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97932,0.013739848,0.0010819038,0.0003387169,0.004906764,0.0006128629],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052620075,0.0010926286,0.0007147783,0.004884882,0.009795385,0.009216644,0.0028896334,0.005091722,0.004844122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026306162,0.0006338596,0.00043761736,0.0076967687,0.012420211,0.010726527,0.0037462784,0.0073174774,0.0014090295],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009710684,0.000010850648,0.00033672783,0.00046426154,0.000009677393,0.00012584854,0.007143857,0.00007168699,0.000059228496,0.08133364,0.8875376,0.022896802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009230015,0.000011726699,0.002465466,0.0012968853,0.000011187186,0.00030440115,0.0067251436,0.00015069383,0.00021163479,0.024298642,0.96446455,0.00005046552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1517999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22684652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1517999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010810415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01413106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30183268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013034108","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.32.1.08","title":"Implicitly Feminist?: The Supreme Court of Canada’s Decision in <i>R v Jarvis</i>","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Humanities; Supreme court; Philosophy; Mythology; Ethnology; Political science; Sociology; Law; Theology","score_opus":0.03559986611675531,"score_gpt":0.27180183418093856,"score_spread":0.23620196806418325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013034108","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15409158,0.007877589,0.0023431666,0.18962643,0.0012258255,0.00007013157,0.00026090065,0.00006620317,0.6444382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89645433,0.0012714848,0.0005182339,0.022252737,0.00017930014,0.000023161278,0.000042399966,0.000051307434,0.07920704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946622,0.0009974285,0.00006634604,0.00052405533,0.0016302262,0.0021196976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99811494,0.00071256096,0.000103375976,0.00006861388,0.0006659669,0.00033450086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027162356,0.00028706857,0.00035807103,0.000731058,0.028672928,0.012767485,0.002089471,0.0067294473,0.0048266654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006234797,0.00036983073,0.0003298246,0.00113363,0.014818102,0.0026080082,0.0027236198,0.0075242603,0.00034607705],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028649527,0.000011258781,0.0012651118,0.000026890651,0.000010256869,0.0004532757,0.025578856,0.00027511062,0.00032870896,0.92972445,0.035110224,0.0071871486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004464026,0.000026396569,0.009269246,0.00040867244,0.00006175697,0.00022630538,0.06093256,0.0013987302,0.0015922138,0.091854215,0.8340012,0.00018409587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97961193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9906446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11519175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11519175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11384327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013383626","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.32.1.07","title":"“You Start to Feel Like You’re Losing Your Mind”: An Intersectionality-Based Policy Analysis of Federal Correctional Segregation Policy and Practice","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Intersectionality; Sociology; Ethnology; Art; Gender studies","score_opus":0.06068259167205629,"score_gpt":0.3351809118305336,"score_spread":0.2744983201584773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013383626","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8235107,0.0025031054,0.004900763,0.04118233,0.00011578856,0.00020193515,0.00027204462,0.000039390943,0.1272739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99509853,0.00041886893,0.00066410814,0.0005743002,0.000014618972,0.000067342575,0.000037622278,0.000008051434,0.003116496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881738,0.004965206,0.00024089009,0.00072009966,0.0015767682,0.0043232855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99033386,0.0034195099,0.0015193243,0.00049907947,0.0025521754,0.0016761442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076444778,0.0003205448,0.00048991386,0.004205651,0.020207176,0.008984448,0.00207494,0.0021061893,0.007875909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016089281,0.00033167997,0.00049805234,0.0057319477,0.016265385,0.0042236224,0.008588116,0.0029682287,0.00024535006],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017736506,0.00021729949,0.12963189,0.00024672985,0.00011244267,0.00041551827,0.26210022,0.0020960812,0.0003530351,0.5411301,0.0076345745,0.055884782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041343752,0.00012209443,0.24123219,0.001547101,0.00015355986,0.00012286885,0.62700367,0.0038220682,0.0005178856,0.0448443,0.08049444,0.00009859006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8208824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85967404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17911762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09140616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08447852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6632012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013560808","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.32.1.11","title":"Melanie Randall, Jennifer Koshan, and Patricia Nyaundi, eds, <i>The Right to Say No: Marital Rape and Law Reform in Canada, Ghana, Kenya and Malawi</i>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Political science; Law; Criminology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.01457874213680791,"score_gpt":0.21906301153678318,"score_spread":0.20448426939997527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013560808","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015102812,0.6377959,0.0002845524,0.32590225,0.01037949,0.00004889488,0.00013663081,0.00003649889,0.02390554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014076206,0.93215144,0.00060638686,0.023859607,0.005237886,0.000076241435,0.000120371915,0.000032168326,0.023839705],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839634,0.0005804915,0.00008780851,0.00011836228,0.0006101691,0.00020680344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955094,0.0025828648,0.00030225833,0.00006118281,0.00076450396,0.0007798498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033917234,0.0009998773,0.0006529304,0.0026795287,0.0070000393,0.006349806,0.0020084134,0.0051078205,0.0075991848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053583304,0.0006790468,0.00045059362,0.0035131173,0.0033918796,0.007409576,0.002181486,0.0058803493,0.0019407258],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019371091,0.000039786948,0.0013306607,0.0004965257,0.000010404376,0.00010832214,0.00557065,0.00006346838,0.000034023404,0.008339628,0.9236041,0.06038314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019991883,0.000017696273,0.012887281,0.0028902376,0.000036457208,0.00028031875,0.038345613,0.000114844064,0.00013390508,0.005483528,0.93974864,0.000041464256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23353603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5458884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.766464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060270857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017347787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46435338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013627713","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.32.1.05","title":"Anti-Veiling and the Charter of Québec Values: “Native Testimonials,” Erasure, and Violence against Montreal’s Muslim Women","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.06364592074912166,"score_gpt":0.29873838385221085,"score_spread":0.23509246310308918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013627713","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5792005,0.0074199717,0.0016101763,0.102870956,0.0010794934,0.00009703593,0.00048309437,0.00004964308,0.3071892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95795864,0.0008389085,0.0002050321,0.0034342275,0.00004779801,0.000015508733,0.00003189909,0.000015306898,0.03745262],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819833,0.0008402918,0.00002620367,0.000117397954,0.00032228345,0.00049561146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970765,0.001174652,0.00024274529,0.00012673218,0.00087744097,0.0005019535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021592593,0.00027818102,0.00014364273,0.00079462625,0.021924078,0.005709969,0.0010040422,0.0017941446,0.008062022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054006726,0.00019278108,0.00013534722,0.00093026063,0.012181595,0.0015938083,0.0022045013,0.002877344,0.0002753077],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011359948,0.00004662616,0.021868013,0.00021567842,0.000033946042,0.0016586066,0.65638095,0.0003715067,0.0013908708,0.15042752,0.12406989,0.043422785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011610823,0.000026933383,0.029222162,0.00037369787,0.000024536037,0.00021508241,0.46131083,0.0003506227,0.0009334285,0.0030659141,0.5043811,0.00008405553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9745291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.991959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05210327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05210327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038690954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37803745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013794120","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.32.1.02","title":"Re-Imagining “Serving Time” in Indigenous Communities","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.03136097003313112,"score_gpt":0.2649811365706912,"score_spread":0.2336201665375601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013794120","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73036844,0.003696919,0.0037909134,0.035853624,0.00039513753,0.000046641948,0.000034478973,0.00002852411,0.2257854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98411083,0.0008946831,0.0007136376,0.0009755024,0.000039214676,0.00002275668,0.000009114577,0.000018779607,0.0132154245],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99568164,0.0030126246,0.000053515418,0.00019601877,0.00028474498,0.0007713856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975314,0.0010670528,0.00027786472,0.00018865982,0.0003118619,0.000622997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035901535,0.0004186384,0.00024536738,0.0011138837,0.014825177,0.007515886,0.0019263258,0.0023534545,0.0063417098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039408295,0.00022761688,0.00033388365,0.0009900357,0.027534038,0.006901746,0.007670853,0.0032572837,0.0004277566],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027863798,0.000029280707,0.0028083997,0.000063009786,0.0000041932976,0.00022488109,0.9359986,0.000056244564,0.0002519286,0.05055314,0.0012081836,0.008774334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031020884,0.000018470893,0.0027632683,0.00012717587,0.0000051409493,0.00007385927,0.95440924,0.00008065362,0.00014293216,0.008069952,0.034296487,0.000009772589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08956436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17498997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9104356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010006964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008971046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17808604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013841376","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.32.1.06","title":"How Much Is That Gamete in the Window? Embryos, Policy, and the Law","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.048112059935623945,"score_gpt":0.27056691512614367,"score_spread":0.22245485519051972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013841376","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04752818,0.08443765,0.008089158,0.40586555,0.0015151681,0.00004733733,0.00026213768,0.00005578754,0.45219904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7800796,0.037613496,0.0025526464,0.07156873,0.0009218775,0.00006415064,0.000113340255,0.00007073421,0.10701541],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99640477,0.0014270556,0.000099543766,0.00054679916,0.0007627501,0.0007591623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962191,0.001990308,0.00027928432,0.0003790418,0.0007139983,0.00041828578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004840296,0.00020943173,0.00036729514,0.0006204167,0.007215787,0.009834549,0.0011764063,0.0053298944,0.009231111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008753693,0.00030758147,0.00030610504,0.0006888847,0.022737488,0.007336868,0.0035357922,0.006241224,0.0009450917],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015039913,0.000007655119,0.0010647605,0.00004903121,0.0000047004796,0.0001528207,0.003991354,0.0000760113,0.00023636423,0.9610894,0.016440298,0.01687255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001169553,0.000038127764,0.0037595655,0.0012257249,0.000029816576,0.0004102697,0.014217634,0.00017315485,0.00072625955,0.33020332,0.6491656,0.000038786366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12139452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13019298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8786055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01142586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016618002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24137586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014022327","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.32.1.03","title":"Workplace Sexual Harassment and the “Unwelcome” Requirement: An Analysis of BC Human Rights Tribunal Decisions from 2010 to 2016","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06606583455891739,"score_gpt":0.3184238201100739,"score_spread":0.2523579855511565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014022327","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9741062,0.0006071927,0.00009399305,0.0035546161,0.000038389375,0.000037578346,0.00022853288,0.0000025510567,0.021331022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873444,0.0005084657,0.000059785707,0.00054913876,0.000017050708,0.000032526783,0.00016161427,0.000007128613,0.0113199195],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961134,0.0007265601,0.00017462503,0.0002820508,0.001122858,0.0015804464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99218726,0.0018762841,0.0017439452,0.00025218286,0.0021320353,0.0018083489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027106253,0.00012831358,0.00022014116,0.0016735418,0.007243605,0.0047539747,0.0010420796,0.0009556545,0.006112607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009795742,0.00025943908,0.00020438389,0.00320616,0.004194461,0.0015200995,0.003551147,0.00258411,0.0007062097],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026465562,0.00017208465,0.3756954,0.00024957236,0.000037627757,0.0016767109,0.5256567,0.00047370134,0.001377418,0.01860354,0.011483334,0.0643092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000446042,0.000040063696,0.47663176,0.00023624815,0.000007952847,0.00010591022,0.48120937,0.00019105227,0.00026500504,0.00054999103,0.040717714,0.00004056921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75230604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87558174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24769396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0182841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017498601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49830532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3029563345","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.32.2.01","title":"Breaking the Silence on Father-Daughter Sexual Abuse of Adolescent Girls: A Case Law Study","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Sexual behavior; Sexual abuse; Poison control; Psychology; Art; Suicide prevention; Social psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.0691734720317803,"score_gpt":0.31764933231429154,"score_spread":0.24847586028251123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3029563345","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98716795,0.0018383517,0.00017172565,0.002629498,0.00004325546,0.00006782479,0.000030282887,0.0000026677153,0.008048388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943303,0.0027366136,0.000088458044,0.00096501847,0.000037667447,0.00006709904,0.000017527516,0.0000053196845,0.0017519396],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99446553,0.0031300255,0.00029052768,0.00043213903,0.00071065844,0.0009709928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876495,0.0071411165,0.0031816394,0.00048651363,0.0006208033,0.00092040474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044511235,0.00032877416,0.0006591543,0.0014476528,0.009282508,0.003035348,0.0012761658,0.0026966073,0.0034366355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018177561,0.000733338,0.00038146516,0.0013593511,0.0063098753,0.0031399764,0.004608249,0.005006824,0.0002853816],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006373667,0.0005679224,0.12908575,0.00021041295,0.00003914629,0.02587684,0.81207436,0.000052433246,0.00057016016,0.014252591,0.0018692799,0.015337373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021950833,0.00026107128,0.08084741,0.0008716446,0.000049538437,0.019680578,0.87406754,0.00017763778,0.00055288454,0.0011129213,0.022310693,0.00004610098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043004636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.065995134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043004636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046498766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00428293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.085508645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3106691758","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.32.2.06","title":"Against Amnesia: African Nova Scotia Women’s Generational Leadership in Civil Rights Organizing, 1950–79","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Humanities; Ethnology; Political science; Civil rights; Sociology; Gender studies; Art; Law","score_opus":0.06067501945083909,"score_gpt":0.21924930636942014,"score_spread":0.15857428691858105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3106691758","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92262644,0.0016601983,0.00009693932,0.012323025,0.00017515851,0.00003163143,0.000049093953,0.000004056297,0.06303341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799942,0.00047508877,0.000042363325,0.00085336127,0.000014640513,0.000010400665,0.000010806217,0.0000036959163,0.018595582],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891007,0.00019376565,0.000013748031,0.000050808787,0.00008891846,0.00074266945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907047,0.00019358711,0.0001207147,0.000038344453,0.00014951691,0.0004273916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014175241,0.0001521341,0.00012360455,0.0007515477,0.01653638,0.0028168864,0.00054839166,0.0008556989,0.0031764943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024643054,0.0001665033,0.000098393015,0.0007203961,0.0068549584,0.00083093334,0.0027802703,0.0020649403,0.00018409835],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011490058,0.00003796104,0.042582154,0.0000665668,0.000009690165,0.0016133133,0.8321716,0.0001082144,0.0012207195,0.07395179,0.015447773,0.032675333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019238123,0.000052471787,0.19837621,0.00026766365,0.000013010922,0.00031835993,0.5555377,0.00012128109,0.00052409753,0.0026441303,0.24209307,0.00003271997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91637534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9678542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08362466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028688151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027059771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20814806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3106939773","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.32.2.03","title":"Stories and the Participation of Indigenous Women in Natural Resource Governance","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Indigenous; Ethnology; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.015410574692817177,"score_gpt":0.20898962802197457,"score_spread":0.1935790533291574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3106939773","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84185696,0.003205426,0.0017641943,0.014762562,0.00024659824,0.00004350954,0.00008200245,0.000030657015,0.13800816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855618,0.0008042067,0.00021669031,0.00047687264,0.000035001205,0.000019299514,0.000014164739,0.000013655902,0.012858377],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99243426,0.004754364,0.00012670868,0.00032677615,0.0009659117,0.0013920714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99350995,0.0041199257,0.0007010593,0.00034162487,0.0004311765,0.000896218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004629795,0.00047081293,0.00032972777,0.0013124839,0.016978147,0.0064371387,0.0015412332,0.0021498431,0.0053386586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007371741,0.00033136108,0.00021698013,0.0013909566,0.028185258,0.0044823615,0.00751212,0.0028741932,0.0003495732],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009186726,0.0000054869734,0.0011498504,0.000025486213,0.0000019135143,0.00035545725,0.9877247,0.000019624138,0.00012667754,0.0076570623,0.0005439546,0.0023805455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017129692,0.000007771387,0.0018854277,0.000073059855,0.0000037010088,0.00016153915,0.94676065,0.00003306213,0.00015082427,0.0013781498,0.04953403,0.0000101404885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16818097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27009818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83181906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008216021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060866107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3344041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108218546","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.32.2.05","title":"Call the Midwife: Privatization and Health Care Reform in an Era of Constrained Public Spending","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.06369944032872378,"score_gpt":0.3000675512639944,"score_spread":0.23636811093527066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108218546","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48775095,0.009819663,0.00306789,0.32895508,0.00044806625,0.00010163226,0.0006462339,0.000059978018,0.16915056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9619984,0.0032134005,0.00065336254,0.007006089,0.00015438742,0.000038483064,0.00009022041,0.000018538924,0.026827132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968888,0.0009768284,0.000052512354,0.00020343238,0.0006169099,0.0012615146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961765,0.0011544541,0.00083136425,0.00024700907,0.000528596,0.0010620246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028634842,0.00014781817,0.00027758704,0.0005895579,0.0044982047,0.0042290506,0.0007284675,0.0017705864,0.007981381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009267593,0.00021777085,0.0003142219,0.0012565743,0.0063650482,0.0021452531,0.0030012939,0.0016162866,0.00032083708],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005107887,0.0000932413,0.07563293,0.00059050147,0.00009519791,0.0007125919,0.052162986,0.0022859594,0.0011185964,0.70268697,0.05083467,0.11327558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014253549,0.00017623274,0.21029212,0.0017221953,0.00012448146,0.00023890527,0.07325468,0.0020101867,0.0009690629,0.057874054,0.65309876,0.00009676403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8007133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90484667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8007133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057039678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07266589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41385376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3109532656","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.32.2.07","title":"Suzanne Zaccour, <i>La fabrique du viol</i>, Montréal, Leméac, 2019.","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.024816780961681918,"score_gpt":0.24242419461433629,"score_spread":0.21760741365265437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3109532656","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018594204,0.2591676,0.0008498264,0.45417044,0.021596357,0.00008979906,0.0011259788,0.00020437413,0.2609362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03219771,0.070976816,0.0005860857,0.0617835,0.002861152,0.00009025696,0.00045607198,0.0002611059,0.8307872],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814856,0.00036175043,0.000035841582,0.00022947462,0.00070496014,0.00051939767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900264,0.00018393717,0.00006558369,0.000033764292,0.00039741304,0.000316632],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014104753,0.00092682015,0.0004084533,0.0010391397,0.012666749,0.005395693,0.0020714141,0.0050136894,0.06278093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031124612,0.0005308692,0.00036243786,0.0016567839,0.005781639,0.0030702048,0.0033954247,0.0063356124,0.009431219],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010601851,0.000006470012,0.00028125028,0.00010206368,0.0000023436091,0.000083681516,0.0020856732,0.00003193514,0.00006629748,0.02055441,0.95442075,0.022354705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016926696,0.000001697508,0.00068718893,0.00013038689,9.897011e-7,0.00003109499,0.001227622,0.0000102783115,0.000036629004,0.0007274762,0.99713933,0.0000055092855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7895599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90273285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7895599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033274584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03342701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4233588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3109993298","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.32.2.04","title":"La féminisation du corps professoral des facultés de droit au Québec","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Legal Systems and Institutions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Feminization (sociology); Political science; Legal education; Law; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.03420782737097164,"score_gpt":0.22620202495997516,"score_spread":0.19199419758900352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3109993298","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64008725,0.017825088,0.0021059418,0.028951345,0.00040282588,0.0000718661,0.0011591105,0.00016030917,0.30923635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86465687,0.0043329503,0.00045096866,0.00082619383,0.00011103535,0.00002126958,0.00012393328,0.00004073527,0.129436],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997834,0.0005667267,0.000032328353,0.00022929756,0.0007435666,0.0005940344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99614316,0.0009380235,0.00046756992,0.000076337754,0.0010818667,0.001293128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017275056,0.00027508262,0.0002392316,0.0016832736,0.00819534,0.0038946893,0.00061842566,0.00092866214,0.021423107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042874976,0.0002989045,0.00028102807,0.001796374,0.00334527,0.0011056457,0.0011191027,0.0015079288,0.0011615017],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029260272,0.00018482843,0.143981,0.0003742289,0.000069605434,0.0029877343,0.16875082,0.0011679723,0.010824217,0.27831113,0.07794794,0.31510788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016789525,0.00005727051,0.27831322,0.0002441996,0.000012668141,0.0006481055,0.027686555,0.0003411677,0.0010392319,0.0009841638,0.69060624,0.00005037369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94253004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9683517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9471154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0528846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02986845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38370645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123893219","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.28.2.342","title":"Balancing Transparency and Accountability with Privacy in Improving the Police Handling of Sexual Assaults","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Accountability; Sexual assault; Legislation; Conflation; Context (archaeology); Business; Information privacy; Public relations; Internet privacy; Political science; Computer security; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Law; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.03634624444334696,"score_gpt":0.2969852791501086,"score_spread":0.26063903470676164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123893219","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24713413,0.0051240604,0.066848256,0.50765014,0.0007263901,0.00088711194,0.00013736884,0.00019393906,0.17129855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9813566,0.00093363563,0.009268393,0.0066827894,0.00014931709,0.00014168453,0.000016078564,0.00001911977,0.0014324035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7818417,0.13646328,0.008348834,0.0060135117,0.05373183,0.01360092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.71036464,0.19526517,0.038038634,0.013992764,0.032537665,0.009801151],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13823798,0.0005688556,0.00071384123,0.0050979,0.015279864,0.016789315,0.0028514927,0.004733931,0.0018001007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25886917,0.0008403191,0.00111144,0.0048803757,0.04093035,0.018302536,0.015938079,0.0072100647,0.00018125142],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001940244,0.00020628159,0.0583152,0.0010510759,0.00017714745,0.0004701294,0.13182507,0.006107325,0.0011155722,0.66254926,0.009161368,0.12882753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031408286,0.00075249095,0.09716782,0.0054157237,0.00048207506,0.0008502535,0.1275909,0.012938657,0.005266004,0.5110014,0.23748149,0.0007391729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41510686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4264045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5848931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05849468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16308294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82538134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124223264","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.29.1.60","title":"Battered Women under Duress: The Supreme Court of Canada's Abandonment of Context and Purpose in <i>R. v Ryan</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Abandonment (legal); Economic Justice; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Criminology; Political science; History","score_opus":0.01594326684379127,"score_gpt":0.23707592576619305,"score_spread":0.22113265892240178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124223264","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23492604,0.016282696,0.0026175946,0.5410611,0.002369051,0.00015851141,0.00023073064,0.00009433508,0.20225994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8793164,0.0028816632,0.0007985467,0.09069265,0.00044091864,0.000044598604,0.000035521964,0.000057100664,0.025732592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899977,0.0017681279,0.00025163835,0.0011014342,0.0025557172,0.0043253913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99363685,0.002525483,0.00030696194,0.00022248266,0.0017935755,0.0015146852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009069974,0.0003676039,0.0008253531,0.00079953636,0.04014357,0.014291072,0.0038206344,0.015934108,0.0020843649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018735847,0.0007620419,0.00062770833,0.001186449,0.026637567,0.0031163932,0.0054367655,0.024068227,0.00014427444],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006865831,0.000026916845,0.004394101,0.00006877686,0.00004315767,0.002881441,0.054534163,0.0005844177,0.0010247513,0.8626249,0.059157826,0.014590712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019166325,0.000112515394,0.021282109,0.0014549948,0.00036309296,0.0013143228,0.11290009,0.0020872958,0.0024407604,0.1310145,0.7260247,0.00081402017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98201597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9928215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1001274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1001274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17515826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7264785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194929843","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.33.1.03","title":"To Protect and Responsibilize: The Discursive Explosion of Combining Youth Sexuality, Human Trafficking, and Online Spaces","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Protectionism; Vulnerability (computing); Human sexuality; Human trafficking; Criminology; Political science; Sex trafficking; Sociology; Gender studies; Law; Computer security; Business; International trade; Computer science","score_opus":0.04527916886593975,"score_gpt":0.31163503073588217,"score_spread":0.2663558618699424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3194929843","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6843863,0.018213706,0.006899687,0.06620397,0.00058606296,0.00010089235,0.00023312087,0.000089028006,0.22328721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98183733,0.0058848606,0.0013910679,0.0031709482,0.00020513362,0.00003074609,0.000039512735,0.000056213576,0.0073840814],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950296,0.0026785058,0.00010683316,0.0004206074,0.0012715465,0.0004928532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936539,0.00392715,0.0006688776,0.00068772834,0.00055884366,0.00050350104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00469697,0.00045551476,0.00036884588,0.0044930894,0.017634217,0.01885312,0.0013008503,0.0032506818,0.002389759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006320998,0.00042890685,0.00035042875,0.004830462,0.049291357,0.010827489,0.01200149,0.0046076123,0.00025321913],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009765965,0.000017043927,0.0053333105,0.00009131771,0.000008754556,0.00097471237,0.8613609,0.00003435758,0.0004233532,0.10274272,0.0037164486,0.025287319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002618092,0.000016138683,0.007615578,0.0005382992,0.000016239686,0.0015240433,0.7966819,0.00014615426,0.00067183975,0.01564561,0.17711619,0.000025388696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1255203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21336482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1255203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011266844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010765056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24957937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194978617","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.33.1.02","title":"Les tribunaux d’arbitrage dans l’engrenage de la division sexuelle du travail : l’interaction des motifs de discrimination fondée sur l’état civil et le sexe","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018851842516939814,"score_gpt":0.26491208954930445,"score_spread":0.24606024703236465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3194978617","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30065194,0.0049446286,0.0083506005,0.048725657,0.0005861728,0.000090526206,0.00009995169,0.000026518532,0.6365241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.924358,0.0009565917,0.0010397959,0.0019792547,0.00006750864,0.00004156533,0.000016362694,0.000023366902,0.07151749],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99639374,0.0015220096,0.00006274761,0.0002616864,0.0007286862,0.001031113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855715,0.00058167434,0.0001231738,0.00011172871,0.00036203174,0.00026426127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026870666,0.00027576849,0.00030953743,0.0011090419,0.017933493,0.007602016,0.0009955837,0.0023494454,0.007561373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031762165,0.00018078195,0.000290634,0.0014580347,0.028256467,0.0026677623,0.0035908942,0.0036979057,0.00045118027],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014414565,0.00001130752,0.0023201916,0.000029593188,0.000003977631,0.00030787825,0.14800866,0.00008165878,0.00026261018,0.8370856,0.0037036743,0.0081704585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020454076,0.00004948322,0.025922978,0.00039103764,0.000017538548,0.0005003188,0.27010778,0.00054372475,0.0007259446,0.08919364,0.6124423,0.00008470592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56342024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.75373054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43657976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016319554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017830558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87830174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195498398","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.33.1.04","title":"Section 28’s Potential to Guarantee Substantive Gender Equality in <i>Hak c Procureur général du Québec</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Gender equality; Charter; Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Action (physics); Order (exchange); Sociology; Constitutional court; Law and economics; Gender studies; Constitution; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.025733274067818057,"score_gpt":0.26755339791935123,"score_spread":0.24182012385153318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195498398","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07278799,0.0015786579,0.0076997904,0.075168714,0.00095153187,0.00031413254,0.0002075321,0.00014453838,0.8411472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7747093,0.0006777556,0.0056640026,0.034431122,0.0002013905,0.00022784782,0.00007768273,0.000077695244,0.18393315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99037814,0.0021478727,0.00026933075,0.0012162483,0.0027400411,0.00324845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99224794,0.0024508848,0.00041579717,0.0007618827,0.0032094042,0.0009140487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008600243,0.0004259656,0.00042162812,0.0009039475,0.016104234,0.008274509,0.0022859548,0.006860831,0.007857807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010637832,0.000573048,0.0007690448,0.000636945,0.02046313,0.0020682565,0.003749515,0.006651955,0.0006265527],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002061227,0.000024180183,0.0014954971,0.000040579547,0.000011366306,0.00052520266,0.008724389,0.0004059083,0.00081408623,0.95004356,0.029678758,0.008215898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008177574,0.0001045124,0.012948826,0.00044466276,0.00005250314,0.00048552442,0.01911286,0.001644149,0.0020839216,0.12816706,0.8346024,0.00027177852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89822453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9510541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10177547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041958213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1088943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3044296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215196532","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.33.2.05","title":"De la fragmentation de la procréation à l’effacement des femmes","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0279250037127664,"score_gpt":0.3086671242685087,"score_spread":0.28074212055574227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3215196532","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4479361,0.012279844,0.021458808,0.046360154,0.0003064316,0.00022240878,0.00028883055,0.00005883021,0.47108856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.964466,0.0037637046,0.0031612867,0.0020374248,0.00004029178,0.000079049765,0.000044344506,0.000010508923,0.026397374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979907,0.0008665641,0.000038594444,0.00021501242,0.00046670053,0.00042248532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968753,0.0015265752,0.00068523735,0.00022715953,0.0004845469,0.00020122975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00304809,0.00034899247,0.00022247342,0.0012290674,0.005390327,0.0030176924,0.00087153714,0.0016353412,0.011378594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005682789,0.00026779133,0.0004256151,0.0011234682,0.013981516,0.0023560894,0.0026230523,0.0018535084,0.00039865388],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060329134,0.00005060793,0.025566341,0.00036572755,0.000038998216,0.0020725164,0.11351994,0.00095025223,0.0011460299,0.79083586,0.0059088403,0.059484497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044013937,0.000264263,0.13388264,0.0032730943,0.00017611099,0.0058409204,0.23551407,0.002338858,0.0022309094,0.1798002,0.43649942,0.0001354913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18007816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23161484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81992185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011161136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0144281555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35805994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216492322","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.33.2.01","title":"La judiciarisation criminelle des violences envers les femmes : Vers un droit sensible aux victimes?","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.0389373811365592,"score_gpt":0.2779503228457012,"score_spread":0.239012941709142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3216492322","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5667396,0.020151025,0.006491228,0.25570014,0.0015470276,0.00018478301,0.00021913454,0.000046680645,0.14892037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97456115,0.0052181953,0.0012807951,0.0100586135,0.00016043051,0.000051390438,0.00003283112,0.000023682145,0.00861305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99058163,0.0043991553,0.00027622347,0.00069800444,0.0018858255,0.0021590826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924975,0.0024016742,0.0012867238,0.00050177565,0.002023133,0.0012891472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062768944,0.00039153197,0.0005459532,0.0018237117,0.015693938,0.007913821,0.0015795992,0.0026051372,0.0054222713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024729248,0.00033088314,0.00035670103,0.002385958,0.018574277,0.003343738,0.003961262,0.004506542,0.0003666177],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011587862,0.0000996572,0.15178044,0.0006180847,0.00013174926,0.0012190167,0.34143993,0.00025879708,0.0012847619,0.34161842,0.023613285,0.13781993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035554254,0.00015496796,0.19337437,0.004080205,0.00012718828,0.0010431085,0.52565694,0.0005073163,0.0009568683,0.03870212,0.23521619,0.00014520716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.64002264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78467864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35997736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023439506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.054629046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72419465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216864938","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.33.2.04","title":"Écrire féministe en droit privé : dialogue sur une démarche parsemée d’embûches","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.059134899173038435,"score_gpt":0.2863735943244301,"score_spread":0.22723869515139167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3216864938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49735686,0.0081701465,0.0048933695,0.15764925,0.0008289387,0.00006512534,0.00015174839,0.000055109787,0.3308294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.933007,0.0010886096,0.00047684673,0.006408244,0.00005088407,0.000028496705,0.000020308229,0.00004232259,0.058877353],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995906,0.0021326775,0.00005019831,0.00029391077,0.00060181326,0.0010153246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970579,0.0012751346,0.00017466713,0.00013184303,0.0006435607,0.00071677944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054180096,0.00034978508,0.00048546738,0.00087888615,0.035841852,0.006916302,0.0010537966,0.003698923,0.007650329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004716155,0.00034491072,0.00026964518,0.001044473,0.027348533,0.004988377,0.0042480933,0.006052354,0.00040116388],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015386953,0.0000146759785,0.0016797186,0.000037315793,0.000004257923,0.000788736,0.7828179,0.000053785297,0.00039792107,0.19327046,0.013006977,0.007912817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056712893,0.000014527515,0.003853462,0.00022646681,0.000006263814,0.00029451793,0.57135063,0.000111526366,0.00021453247,0.007222616,0.416665,0.00003477367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7758313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8724617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7758313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0458305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035104517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45097774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217687857","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.33.2.02","title":"La juge Abella : la première réfugiée à devenir juge au Canada et ses contributions au droit de l’immigration et des réfugiés","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Healthcare Systems and Practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Immigration; Humanities; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03563854373017719,"score_gpt":0.3502790235215406,"score_spread":0.31464047979136345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3217687857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56338215,0.009418675,0.0012371944,0.13029043,0.0006445635,0.000065721964,0.0007530643,0.000036147067,0.2941722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91739225,0.0037556817,0.0004970717,0.0064301547,0.000061520455,0.000025795365,0.0001340216,0.000023794419,0.07167967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808854,0.00026681944,0.000023173196,0.00014816929,0.00039193293,0.0010813709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998059,0.0002119409,0.00018869838,0.000057617413,0.00064915913,0.00083354994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012649471,0.0002984557,0.0003492058,0.0007567227,0.017480116,0.006991297,0.001018388,0.0013893507,0.007779749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026706108,0.0001788971,0.00030610035,0.0012895628,0.0058830734,0.0017849233,0.0036050503,0.0029155754,0.000483823],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025833762,0.00016008179,0.16452497,0.00025288275,0.000095975774,0.0022835392,0.25800347,0.0005751099,0.0013319538,0.37029466,0.09013132,0.11208771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022850396,0.000056829984,0.16279967,0.00071389996,0.00009111308,0.0003827599,0.28781992,0.0003624959,0.00061556045,0.01089996,0.53613937,0.00009559064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9687036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99015474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04445644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04445644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.082206465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32255554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230729731","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.28.2.285","title":"Gendering Disposability","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Colonialism; Power (physics); Sexual violence; Criminology; Gender studies; Sociology; White (mutation); History; Law; Ethnology; Political science","score_opus":0.02927460195298885,"score_gpt":0.2721964668887151,"score_spread":0.2429218649357263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230729731","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25734916,0.003016278,0.010065859,0.014456444,0.00050044514,0.00008293139,0.00020758239,0.000034121258,0.7142871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805704,0.0003619168,0.00053569366,0.00061846175,0.000041099287,0.000028083625,0.000030234682,0.000014868703,0.017799286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796057,0.00073315966,0.000054872722,0.0003034378,0.0003744824,0.0005735476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894756,0.00048532826,0.0001346001,0.00014346234,0.00014583305,0.00014318434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026051942,0.00036505001,0.0002456986,0.0009207631,0.007032856,0.004049643,0.0005966887,0.0012167745,0.0107994005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043399087,0.00014779449,0.00030448698,0.00049077737,0.028055975,0.004271963,0.0047627497,0.0020276525,0.00044352698],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011857449,0.0000075153557,0.0027469757,0.000014290528,0.0000030042577,0.00036203704,0.0366995,0.000044322227,0.00012662259,0.9533179,0.0010227786,0.005643248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014483034,0.00005954285,0.010490595,0.0002556659,0.000019039733,0.0010549442,0.11495918,0.00022257655,0.0007691698,0.62328833,0.2488207,0.000045901535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032179285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04116896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9678207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004916726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037610822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06398398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230968483","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.28.2.429","title":"L'enquête nationale sur les meurtres et disparitions de femmes et de filles autochtones","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.03349201909926656,"score_gpt":0.25909639674029206,"score_spread":0.2256043776410255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230968483","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.071577385,0.048263073,0.003067777,0.39409283,0.01382817,0.00037968054,0.0021348172,0.00016879712,0.4664874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3574908,0.05877962,0.00871002,0.09993319,0.0016225738,0.0010317184,0.0025993362,0.0002669832,0.4695658],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98815453,0.0038670304,0.0005173089,0.0007986943,0.003903628,0.0027586257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9722735,0.007279422,0.0011058907,0.0012262441,0.014202573,0.003912364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0142426295,0.00051553565,0.00066972565,0.0016360304,0.01566353,0.0072966963,0.0019066518,0.0046948413,0.027114235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020687465,0.0004541109,0.0005969307,0.0021585687,0.006969245,0.0037644089,0.00547292,0.0077530276,0.0033697565],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012200405,0.00013722126,0.016282624,0.0017570351,0.00004182538,0.0010074814,0.14117339,0.00017924322,0.0017793443,0.12536393,0.564621,0.14753482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005455333,0.00002422807,0.010207289,0.0018375766,0.000021301212,0.00018882891,0.05093652,0.000026949989,0.00039874026,0.0017501808,0.9345651,0.000037805235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56061274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7789463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43938726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025103223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09650939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8839498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236586461","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.28.2.408","title":"The National Inquiry on Murders and Disappearances of Indigenous Women and Girls","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Mandate; Lesbian; Transgender; Theme (computing); Political science; Gender studies; Queer; Transsexual; Alliance; Human rights; Criminology; Face (sociological concept); Sociology; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.0247909159580407,"score_gpt":0.28388664451512985,"score_spread":0.2590957285570892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236586461","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025483202,0.051349718,0.0010599908,0.7180392,0.019139133,0.00044023103,0.0013693448,0.0001057211,0.18301353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3434708,0.06976409,0.0131333005,0.23556276,0.0031278483,0.0008954776,0.0022612284,0.00021844586,0.331566],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96893567,0.007174114,0.0017831014,0.0015282505,0.013392457,0.007186413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9712686,0.0045362734,0.00071954244,0.00096789293,0.016750092,0.00575763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029722298,0.0005871578,0.0010061072,0.0021982726,0.018950779,0.012865685,0.004568327,0.009039754,0.0049438816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034194976,0.0007620593,0.0009745456,0.001925817,0.011495197,0.0050486396,0.008408774,0.012309183,0.0012376704],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007639569,0.000069442285,0.005153295,0.0015918426,0.00003130021,0.0009871457,0.16021483,0.00026930845,0.0009614667,0.097181454,0.670902,0.0625616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007620969,0.000015529233,0.005952234,0.00267919,0.000037034133,0.00013944316,0.09059768,0.00005283079,0.00032251742,0.0021260527,0.8980131,0.0000567254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91208875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9441716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08791125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07785453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32627058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5648768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241680288","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.26.2.09","title":"Book Reviews / Chroniques bibliographiques","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Persecution; Queen (butterfly); Criminology; Conciliation; Law; Criminal justice; Sociology; Art history; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.019441866659206213,"score_gpt":0.24969677365111548,"score_spread":0.23025490699190926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241680288","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002628881,0.5679605,0.00045139683,0.0078766495,0.037746582,0.00021425956,0.009007375,0.00075363426,0.37572664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0024566443,0.52173185,0.0009472029,0.006028763,0.015635133,0.0003617922,0.0093815895,0.000498319,0.44295877],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99710995,0.00023447942,0.00025121088,0.00028883904,0.001851609,0.00026409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923942,0.0011398222,0.0005652625,0.0004368804,0.004981153,0.0004827494],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013658109,0.0017035924,0.0024172005,0.024922756,0.0025647103,0.00996238,0.002602128,0.0021015252,0.3741306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075764633,0.0010627356,0.0009011329,0.0523168,0.0014352533,0.0039886055,0.0020689534,0.002848705,0.26243195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008740099,0.000010726039,0.00003279474,0.0013173496,0.000004682911,0.000034979537,0.00006291455,0.000034867862,0.00007595423,0.0010135744,0.94880813,0.048595373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027868819,0.0000030094207,0.0001807083,0.0011539743,0.000003987705,0.00003683938,0.00006888491,0.0000041632034,0.000017916911,0.00012977705,0.99839276,0.000005204258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.068746984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10303957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.931253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008768733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011620785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8927267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256340648","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.27.1.130a","title":"Book Reviews / Chroniques bibliographiques","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kinship; Sociology; Sexual assault; Political science; Law; Criminology; Medicine; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.04119826754527508,"score_gpt":0.27204608791252455,"score_spread":0.23084782036724946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256340648","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00035564337,0.61547476,0.0005940363,0.004814171,0.030809207,0.00020467416,0.007059831,0.0009162328,0.3397715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0021676517,0.55311096,0.0013754015,0.004163138,0.012541335,0.00028290297,0.008381766,0.0004930904,0.41748375],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982102,0.00014197684,0.00017475245,0.00018937099,0.0011149509,0.00016865409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99478805,0.0008238084,0.00042983054,0.00029310188,0.0032680687,0.00039711143],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090877665,0.0018255658,0.0023722358,0.020953586,0.0017750916,0.0075956327,0.0019445746,0.0013940583,0.33929792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005455421,0.001060147,0.0008934584,0.042751107,0.0010106512,0.0034306995,0.0016394632,0.0024026462,0.26283848],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015037156,0.00001666685,0.000050688053,0.0016054936,0.000006871203,0.000046450405,0.00004564303,0.00005498312,0.00015415707,0.00095296954,0.9129901,0.08406087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035733715,0.0000046866917,0.00024014313,0.0011379364,0.000005714361,0.000066236404,0.000045275483,0.0000071597356,0.000027813117,0.00017136708,0.9982838,0.0000062869185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03529973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061012033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9647003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004773944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068742717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9424113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283311748","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.34.1.06","title":"Power, Gender, and Race in the Legal Profession","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Caucus; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Race (biology); Power (physics); Event (particle physics); Law; Political science; History; Gender studies; Sociology; Medicine; Politics","score_opus":0.04146646887058816,"score_gpt":0.32968739872032826,"score_spread":0.2882209298497401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283311748","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2226191,0.010517803,0.00072157785,0.1035756,0.0009466559,0.000027218006,0.00007188641,0.000012916234,0.6615071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9498546,0.0018913392,0.00014474851,0.0036338775,0.00020459275,0.000024178787,0.0000079612055,0.00001735382,0.044221167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956559,0.0023503806,0.000057600064,0.00025429807,0.0007575506,0.0009242997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968995,0.0014535547,0.00028528308,0.00007318351,0.00036262104,0.0009259189],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003963405,0.00015502803,0.0002725719,0.0012422245,0.014248736,0.0068535395,0.0005008247,0.0011547381,0.016147614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008997542,0.00013770189,0.00013674083,0.001142695,0.017157473,0.0036365949,0.003596313,0.0018253304,0.0009176605],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006675277,0.000071946044,0.012077549,0.00006372279,0.000006992111,0.000350465,0.3240147,0.000045376928,0.00021329008,0.5866435,0.03270702,0.043738727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002593418,0.00006947671,0.026247157,0.00068677467,0.000011932106,0.00029562553,0.4838901,0.0001260132,0.00017330931,0.11292141,0.3755198,0.000032492662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.074846245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15565166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9857513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060764677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00911399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14882118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283314595","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.34.1.184","title":"Corrigendum","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Slavic languages; Indigenous; The Renaissance; Sociology; Politics; Classics; Media studies; Anthropology; Social science; Humanities; Library science; History; Political science; Art history; Art; Law","score_opus":0.02516872855365308,"score_gpt":0.23286463198572266,"score_spread":0.2076959034320696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283314595","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00036007838,0.0035151064,0.00097271154,0.03408927,0.33907095,0.00032769225,0.019344786,0.0025272747,0.599792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001342312,0.001653631,0.0006567366,0.0054549226,0.010632491,0.000108235545,0.0041692806,0.00062544807,0.97535694],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970715,0.00021893655,0.0002011216,0.00030206674,0.0019721342,0.00023425983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9811998,0.001236954,0.00028555532,0.0009539366,0.015302163,0.0010216235],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014296004,0.0012408261,0.0012371741,0.0056844004,0.0048073567,0.0071982304,0.0024422992,0.0028991287,0.6446243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02388227,0.0006230812,0.000879752,0.005431163,0.0009914766,0.0024595344,0.002046868,0.0026645355,0.53432477],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027286508,0.0000028504203,0.000018051947,0.000030005845,5.078882e-7,0.00002059019,0.0000076211545,0.0000084641515,0.0000070501633,0.00037464747,0.9926623,0.006865152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031844324,0.0000041010103,0.00023439659,0.00009257352,0.000002375788,0.00004458337,0.00004673402,0.00002704577,0.00003512207,0.00044505266,0.999057,0.000007881945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11340266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14147325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6446243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008388962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008839055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5069003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283317485","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.34.1.04","title":"What Do You Call an Indigenous Woman with a PhD in Law? Resisting the Subjugation of Indigenous Expertise in Legal Spheres","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Indigenization; Colonialism; Legal education; Racism; Decolonization; Sociology; Law; Traditional knowledge; Political science; Anthropology; Ecology","score_opus":0.03228845169723625,"score_gpt":0.3020444394008083,"score_spread":0.269755987703572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283317485","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27025005,0.009147238,0.0017515651,0.6354822,0.008966231,0.00010216502,0.00004676724,0.00009864584,0.074155055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7897752,0.011805134,0.0021931408,0.1013495,0.0018974585,0.00009474444,0.000024698646,0.000103606064,0.09275659],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807763,0.0006807871,0.000040387094,0.00016770855,0.00046151996,0.0005720399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975805,0.0004884388,0.00019074239,0.00005925932,0.00035792965,0.0013230036],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021652882,0.00030141533,0.0004861773,0.00074340386,0.024863614,0.004190814,0.0012417691,0.0039763167,0.0041412497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008225199,0.0002902859,0.00034441243,0.00061569246,0.012739657,0.005545177,0.004088054,0.008944229,0.0011794105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027788014,0.0001096922,0.006069527,0.0001331566,0.000009649844,0.011075157,0.88011336,0.000049189268,0.0010459459,0.021280643,0.050507575,0.029578293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004015077,0.00007922905,0.0022592351,0.0002735949,0.000010017635,0.006709519,0.8174095,0.00009174066,0.0002351452,0.002892796,0.16999301,0.00004216114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06437753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10671114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9751364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004752506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008540983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12800568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283319944","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.34.1.02","title":"Surrogacy in Canada: Lawyers’ Experiences and Practices","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Narrative; Power (physics); Wish; Political science; Law; Sociology; Public relations; Social science","score_opus":0.03846638008097244,"score_gpt":0.2834843855028589,"score_spread":0.24501800542188648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283319944","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89092374,0.0042885835,0.00101898,0.053135213,0.0002427363,0.00013543542,0.0001709408,0.000052476385,0.05003184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97613907,0.002517776,0.00048785517,0.0057845847,0.00003123806,0.000037039805,0.000056074405,0.000031609907,0.014914863],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889535,0.0029396391,0.00026434736,0.00082717143,0.002909706,0.004105668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977692,0.010188332,0.0017324333,0.00037825786,0.0034671987,0.0065417835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073507656,0.00028422568,0.000760109,0.001949649,0.053058412,0.009776261,0.003428144,0.005624523,0.007582611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028138874,0.0008160663,0.00029205505,0.006261076,0.019766752,0.002830058,0.007121122,0.007009751,0.0003831573],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030427998,0.00004499587,0.0076247174,0.000064246306,0.000004306168,0.002118268,0.9639706,0.00006411734,0.00033197892,0.0076638577,0.006032508,0.012049998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006703615,0.00002165981,0.0062353816,0.00018071724,0.0000068642426,0.0004432235,0.9076937,0.00015078022,0.00013232266,0.00070008123,0.08438686,0.00004174476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96338606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98363644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11282058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11282058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1543987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8185744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283325100","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.34.1.01","title":"Comprendre l’inconduite sexuelle policière : une perspective canadienne","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Portrait; Ethnology; Sociology; Art; Art history","score_opus":0.021751862491320273,"score_gpt":0.2609736175742867,"score_spread":0.23922175508296645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283325100","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017401716,0.092632085,0.0035156405,0.37526488,0.0052576624,0.00006071163,0.000188896,0.00005002559,0.5056284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5837163,0.11029741,0.0025955783,0.08928955,0.005130534,0.00019582851,0.00016978435,0.00016827298,0.2084367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913858,0.003416204,0.00018870189,0.000768721,0.0021722408,0.002068332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942333,0.0028138673,0.00031101404,0.00021999454,0.0013504797,0.0010713344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005085576,0.0009837332,0.00094845815,0.0043046004,0.022796592,0.022553822,0.0027748658,0.00840799,0.011358576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007089716,0.0004307704,0.00064664596,0.005449409,0.04018864,0.0073317094,0.007495933,0.012267075,0.0027019163],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017049671,0.000023335942,0.0007964473,0.00020597441,0.00001113192,0.0004944862,0.11696351,0.00014962496,0.00010700407,0.8399447,0.029495634,0.011791114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007345272,0.000011554478,0.0013562357,0.00085370056,0.000011916096,0.00022061344,0.07851368,0.00008474744,0.000095940704,0.05322343,0.8655809,0.000039940445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6903157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7407239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94360316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05639682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06115191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6230161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283376689","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.34.1.03","title":"Defamation as a Sword: The Weaponization of Civil Liability against Sexual Assault Survivors in the Post-#MeToo Era","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Intimidation; SWORD; Context (archaeology); Criminology; Lawsuit; Popularity; Mythology; Law; Sexual violence; Liability; Psychology; Political science; Poison control; History; Suicide prevention; Engineering; Medicine; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.017629528914044824,"score_gpt":0.2556159548781488,"score_spread":0.237986425964104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283376689","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64915806,0.003682519,0.0036265855,0.047086865,0.00035376463,0.00007665907,0.000094722716,0.00003812405,0.29588273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840853,0.0008494755,0.000355673,0.0016929191,0.00004292717,0.0000098072305,0.000014072425,0.0000117000545,0.012938171],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971342,0.00083537074,0.000056480145,0.00014530867,0.0008219408,0.0010066754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99690944,0.0013041111,0.00050466054,0.00026120627,0.0006004781,0.00042008128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024469565,0.00020850662,0.00019999572,0.0014603463,0.017331285,0.0077860123,0.001098561,0.0023647682,0.0053224848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008843685,0.00021830242,0.00025459708,0.0012241038,0.024295678,0.0040655923,0.0066532064,0.004939145,0.00027810864],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041294294,0.000028875442,0.014798298,0.000074504096,0.000010093751,0.0017192481,0.5344491,0.00015702879,0.00077084464,0.4018593,0.007225511,0.03886585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069986845,0.000056606234,0.026711602,0.0006014192,0.00002709077,0.0016197332,0.64906377,0.00042757674,0.0011753971,0.02853397,0.29170045,0.000075347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.62132865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81585795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62132865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025164682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02614529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7618028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361981919","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.34.2.05","title":"“Rights Talk,” Abortion, and the Media: Tracking the Evolution of Abortion Discourse in Saskatchewan Newspapers","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Abortion; Charter; Framing (construction); Terminology; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; Media studies; Law; History; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011648151898360054,"score_gpt":0.2494919069334252,"score_spread":0.23784375503506516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361981919","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95307255,0.0023303246,0.00020505948,0.0061958986,0.00007012652,0.00008239741,0.0027941703,0.000017789873,0.035231665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824174,0.0037508947,0.0004254463,0.0017579645,0.000069203605,0.000120084274,0.0011898625,0.000041320363,0.010227743],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969785,0.0011955647,0.00015082894,0.00033144336,0.00078926276,0.0005544273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95708394,0.025253318,0.0056763827,0.0010815103,0.009158963,0.001745927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031371224,0.00040037837,0.00033080616,0.012619689,0.009309806,0.009969831,0.0013304385,0.0012677762,0.0057589384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013685017,0.0006045204,0.00019424631,0.023922343,0.0061571132,0.002952505,0.0039550224,0.0020517353,0.00064812554],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029115527,0.000118904005,0.23204254,0.00056330016,0.0000913396,0.001729408,0.7053227,0.00018883853,0.004684522,0.008503138,0.0113507,0.035113424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018292973,0.000032789132,0.32150942,0.0005579556,0.00007745374,0.00023401456,0.6132311,0.00028449774,0.001552974,0.00073343795,0.061656788,0.00011125039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8852486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96284986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1147514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047337156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03322735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34345675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361983182","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.34.2.08","title":"<i>Animals as Legal Beings: Contesting Anthropocentric Legal Orders</i>, by Maneesha Deckha","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Anthropological Studies and Insights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Anthropocentrism; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.019556821616703714,"score_gpt":0.2700452350625332,"score_spread":0.2504884134458295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361983182","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005920991,0.08967747,0.00079055596,0.84099424,0.005120971,0.0000139741505,0.000053339507,0.000014246777,0.05741421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3876128,0.1611007,0.0033370678,0.31807983,0.020128045,0.00017287838,0.00009707444,0.00022058532,0.10925099],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978471,0.0013109298,0.00006236427,0.00023018,0.00033492685,0.00021456915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949674,0.004108673,0.00020251273,0.00009582532,0.00039921168,0.00022637693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037741296,0.000591989,0.00054736994,0.0010424575,0.011571897,0.010976332,0.001453094,0.00677402,0.003265819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067021744,0.0004974512,0.00027166205,0.0015389023,0.023123864,0.013626879,0.0040534255,0.010901222,0.00061230623],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026905696,0.000025580455,0.0004722775,0.00015462707,0.0000099654335,0.00015141797,0.051185515,0.00008228998,0.00013058598,0.58300674,0.3512654,0.013488699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010711501,0.000011661561,0.00129843,0.0005552014,0.0000106844955,0.00027376565,0.06056933,0.0001802426,0.0001870184,0.13504367,0.8018289,0.000030401787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037017625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08034466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037017625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036934463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006738763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073604286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361984363","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.34.2.02","title":"“Add Women and Stir”: The Potential and Limits of GBA+ in Canadian Impact Assessment Law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Framing (construction); Impact assessment; Disparate impact; Political science; Injustice; Environmental impact assessment; Intersectionality; Genetic discrimination; Law; Sociology; Engineering; Civil rights; Medicine","score_opus":0.01601715296187049,"score_gpt":0.27895291013984325,"score_spread":0.26293575717797274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361984363","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05389372,0.006884778,0.008682557,0.32749018,0.0011911319,0.00018561805,0.00019879735,0.00014031376,0.6013329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8178646,0.003908315,0.007630107,0.103263594,0.00037003186,0.00018775852,0.0000725102,0.000114794835,0.06658837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97556394,0.005247216,0.0005567165,0.0024277265,0.009815467,0.006388886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98866606,0.0048271734,0.00041457798,0.00064543734,0.0037805957,0.0016660937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019996399,0.0007825344,0.00077226077,0.0026301248,0.03732903,0.019408587,0.004285888,0.00866471,0.0071115433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021936476,0.00093137147,0.00094554026,0.0025513626,0.052122995,0.006816778,0.012169993,0.011206596,0.00047156098],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019459054,0.000015737622,0.0018377488,0.000060481645,0.000011625651,0.00023983174,0.01877708,0.00032193432,0.0002829107,0.9348359,0.024754068,0.018843338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004626981,0.000055352477,0.007401649,0.0010414497,0.00009582565,0.00025423558,0.03598665,0.0017164447,0.0005976842,0.18349291,0.7689932,0.00031821133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9798605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9882598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86171484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13828513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2315902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361986374","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.34.2.03","title":"Les francophones éffacé·e·s : l’intersectionnalité et la mise en œuvre des droits linguistiques législatifs en Ontario et au Canada","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; French; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.013676017808607404,"score_gpt":0.2318854212184132,"score_spread":0.2182094034098058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361986374","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7474942,0.002378443,0.0019302225,0.017626349,0.00007472068,0.000050806015,0.00062302727,0.000033131688,0.22978908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827928,0.0004986551,0.00020576232,0.0003842979,0.0000075823723,0.000013740695,0.000069484566,0.00000977563,0.016017996],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971865,0.00039058327,0.00006214434,0.00027884063,0.00090403145,0.0011778969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99678516,0.0006014055,0.00038754556,0.00012329327,0.0014373922,0.00066517486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016876591,0.00021315708,0.00029800477,0.0010905245,0.013909264,0.005579534,0.00085235474,0.0008435252,0.0073481356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036077593,0.00024719493,0.00023165195,0.002387124,0.009346181,0.0015092482,0.0027555423,0.0015254326,0.00028837266],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019562263,0.000045704186,0.11875391,0.00020719496,0.0000670572,0.000632752,0.4180061,0.0008851968,0.0015516322,0.39107493,0.015968954,0.052610934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030344567,0.00006204547,0.31513003,0.00048111446,0.00009634282,0.00018071222,0.3173569,0.0010401602,0.0009766538,0.008472198,0.35602346,0.00014996636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9915828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99616206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08628169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08628169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10770256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6260204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361986848","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.34.2.06","title":"The Role of Motive in Sexual Assault Trials","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Scrutiny; Sexual assault; Psychology; Social psychology; Criminology; Deception; Law; Political science; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.04579871980734939,"score_gpt":0.30970335697991785,"score_spread":0.26390463717256846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361986848","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8598833,0.012719592,0.0054629827,0.009987136,0.0004647974,0.00062205666,0.00021835431,0.00002888566,0.11061302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936243,0.001141381,0.0014540363,0.0009423746,0.00012240367,0.0002680826,0.000055395143,0.000018009709,0.0023740248],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.91567343,0.066741034,0.0035399173,0.0025251755,0.008980645,0.0025397097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7915616,0.17013425,0.022438774,0.006168157,0.006327279,0.0033698566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08061271,0.00039880362,0.0012718042,0.0027164912,0.0033606072,0.0052358257,0.001738276,0.0032756797,0.007351134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26751137,0.000644812,0.00076869427,0.0014791897,0.007920436,0.005574652,0.003852762,0.002729118,0.0006002494],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0048644077,0.0012149689,0.5212807,0.0025069348,0.00095659896,0.0037599395,0.028471837,0.0007882637,0.0021394088,0.26449242,0.0039925263,0.16553196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007105673,0.0048307655,0.75417405,0.004848271,0.000695466,0.0071262396,0.023909675,0.0044357064,0.0029258844,0.14303814,0.05296823,0.00033692786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012801137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026025786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9987199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001694755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023281833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42632586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361989170","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.34.2.07","title":"Trans Rights, Trans Justice: A Conversation About Key Trans Legal Issues in Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Economic Justice; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Social justice; Backlash; Sociology; Law and economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.013871793585896868,"score_gpt":0.24039176472040483,"score_spread":0.22651997113450795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361989170","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038735516,0.010070016,0.00091983593,0.8908146,0.005675488,0.00009985767,0.00014919146,0.000036459613,0.053499047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.559896,0.009848052,0.0015611384,0.37387228,0.0011241675,0.00016669302,0.000083296334,0.00014765197,0.053300694],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9831129,0.0050590867,0.000286004,0.001190248,0.0033310377,0.0070208088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851563,0.0055354903,0.00033390263,0.00017031959,0.0025790716,0.006224909],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013419819,0.0008877884,0.0012148804,0.0022654212,0.12436713,0.02207112,0.0045634876,0.022618758,0.007416302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015872324,0.0010133354,0.00097188994,0.0038863942,0.03421725,0.00805829,0.008882216,0.03194738,0.00045401003],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102041515,0.00009423376,0.0027074772,0.00024469057,0.000030909832,0.0022915364,0.5400358,0.0003571289,0.00092950667,0.17313293,0.26180315,0.018270642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014678771,0.00002435278,0.0018734871,0.00032409953,0.000015673468,0.00020227014,0.47665867,0.0002690064,0.00020307972,0.0064933933,0.5137967,0.00012467343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99014413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99516076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22614734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22614734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27514043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8975594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361994661","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.34.2.01","title":"La non-reconnaissance des unions coutumières et religieuses dans le nouveau droit de la famille ivoirien : un non-respect du droit à l’égalité des femmes","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05612815699136493,"score_gpt":0.3175383290515012,"score_spread":0.2614101720601363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361994661","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9323587,0.0017365913,0.0015941641,0.0057974607,0.00008381345,0.0000231868,0.000033558474,0.0000074919644,0.058365073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989943,0.00035969677,0.00030399935,0.00028412865,0.000011636594,0.000018425882,0.000010168985,0.000004785236,0.009064175],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99718636,0.0014200981,0.00006489482,0.00028240177,0.00030988833,0.00073633617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977374,0.00077586377,0.0005771908,0.00017848813,0.0002889814,0.00044199754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035940926,0.00021657586,0.00030555218,0.0007036123,0.00891477,0.004159537,0.00076338614,0.0010603832,0.006362937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055599688,0.00026602476,0.00018878556,0.0008391472,0.008261742,0.0021462892,0.004845071,0.002330905,0.0003560862],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001120019,0.00005808255,0.059706856,0.00013711484,0.000028998698,0.00073819247,0.7109953,0.00012545101,0.0015027076,0.1928491,0.0013054245,0.0324408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022851484,0.00013185508,0.11769263,0.0005803029,0.000039570372,0.00040241785,0.7665748,0.00011910751,0.00068560726,0.013599301,0.10010387,0.000047690162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050261788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1211224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050261788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005420814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006850432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09993845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386711153","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.2023.06.12","title":"Grounds-Based Distinctions: Contested Starting Points in Equality Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Doctrine; Law; Charter; Legislature; Political science; Meaning (existential); Common law; Sociology; Law and economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.06390549496755529,"score_gpt":0.3022023849584156,"score_spread":0.23829688999086032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386711153","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047834318,0.0166829,0.1693716,0.27725232,0.0028960726,0.0003199181,0.00026542498,0.0002242048,0.48515317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88486415,0.004367276,0.056278266,0.029281978,0.0014855848,0.00047305372,0.00014128332,0.000241887,0.022866562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.975042,0.009508545,0.0011438101,0.002594438,0.0087218,0.0029892572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98374087,0.010990256,0.00064987224,0.0010800615,0.0024786976,0.0010603138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032478772,0.0008147443,0.0015835274,0.004248293,0.019543542,0.02716592,0.006388545,0.013078298,0.0044837105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030002981,0.0010183351,0.0013656119,0.0030185862,0.1140501,0.025642814,0.012904568,0.02783165,0.0008173613],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016315576,0.0000017798673,0.000025598663,0.0000034808418,6.142996e-7,0.000013501337,0.0007004496,0.00003993906,0.000013311719,0.9980184,0.00031735285,0.00086394424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008162153,0.0000057016073,0.00009901079,0.00006552257,0.0000025329746,0.000011868866,0.00097583904,0.00025171295,0.00006201458,0.98658293,0.0119219525,0.000012799446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22760935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24940674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77239066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0430794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0366189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.452569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387169431","doi":"10.3138/cjwl-2023-07-12","title":"Prison Activism on Trial: Canadian Feminists Mobilize against the Carceral State during the 1970s","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; State (computer science); Context (archaeology); Gender studies; Sociology; Criminology; Race (biology); Prison reform; Political science; History","score_opus":0.023144856269672217,"score_gpt":0.2510285538708227,"score_spread":0.22788369760115046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387169431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6565289,0.009268382,0.0005623973,0.068914086,0.00124251,0.00019130993,0.0002976803,0.00006303307,0.26293173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9518292,0.001965132,0.00014406578,0.005670185,0.0001358513,0.000051670548,0.000051773393,0.000042893702,0.040109232],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912219,0.0013088126,0.00011600166,0.00057863566,0.0020393212,0.0047352132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992649,0.0021315715,0.00048141947,0.00022015569,0.002231909,0.0022860183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005380241,0.000477873,0.00068538554,0.0034440148,0.07333311,0.013699223,0.0025835985,0.0060233246,0.006639144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013458617,0.0006410784,0.00030138402,0.00404155,0.033352308,0.0028635836,0.007404945,0.008460798,0.00036121023],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013128562,0.000061672385,0.0075236387,0.00015477608,0.000016774999,0.0015764307,0.79716605,0.00017909876,0.0007148568,0.108570844,0.05335587,0.030548641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020185744,0.000030926672,0.017833699,0.00032084505,0.000016966422,0.00016023176,0.4353355,0.00010024228,0.0005318172,0.001849911,0.5437277,0.000071937466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98793507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99515057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15008265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15008265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13263218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98578364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390048205","doi":"10.3138/cjwl_2023_grant3","title":"A Conversation on Feminism, Ableism, and Medical Assistance in Dying","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Silence; Conversation; Sociology; Feminism; Autonomy; Solidarity; Gender studies; Ableism; Law; Political science; Politics; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.07982713056455543,"score_gpt":0.3465495718912263,"score_spread":0.2667224413266709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390048205","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022157922,0.023101745,0.0021110806,0.68410045,0.0040981304,0.00003464528,0.000071182956,0.000035398105,0.26428944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6849696,0.013313925,0.001383069,0.18585907,0.0016920747,0.00008893435,0.000045679437,0.00008313677,0.1125646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911238,0.0041905968,0.00012023745,0.00037611974,0.0017891382,0.0024000206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99464405,0.003693938,0.00020490012,0.00010631538,0.0004988529,0.00085193594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0088041695,0.0005685493,0.00056360546,0.0013057957,0.042089093,0.012286594,0.0024208296,0.009558943,0.005150802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007902759,0.00029232973,0.00049968506,0.001748837,0.073469855,0.006928979,0.008764668,0.012061664,0.00043677658],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014647552,0.000012405872,0.00032906255,0.00006691786,0.000003815169,0.0005915356,0.211812,0.000081219725,0.00010145951,0.7206397,0.056987513,0.009359752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007884619,0.00000966982,0.0006333947,0.00042500757,0.0000046342884,0.00026750626,0.14376266,0.000053896343,0.00011852668,0.0293093,0.8253754,0.000032165026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.64691305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7360725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64691305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.056703784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043130495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7103327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390062336","doi":"10.3138/cjwl_2023_09_22","title":"Police Sexual Violence and Corporate Crime","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Corporate crime; Criminology; Sexual assault; Corporate security; Organizational culture; Sexual violence; Scholarship; Business; Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Corporate social responsibility; Law; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics","score_opus":0.06447961502606565,"score_gpt":0.30412564093864436,"score_spread":0.23964602591257872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390062336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8703588,0.0124589745,0.00040954247,0.012986754,0.0001481106,0.000028760565,0.000049839316,0.00000511303,0.10355395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941478,0.004157715,0.000057543104,0.00034228017,0.000051392555,0.000009543947,0.00001051624,0.0000017015703,0.0012214949],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973369,0.0015973954,0.00008290739,0.00012662767,0.00035462633,0.0005015075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99588543,0.001722272,0.0013616973,0.00016101454,0.00034674568,0.00052278006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012012356,0.0001857149,0.00029273078,0.0024784212,0.004294724,0.003700002,0.00048375706,0.0011851906,0.004085153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065475414,0.0001964567,0.00027203528,0.0018191949,0.00835135,0.0020123513,0.0031602671,0.0014703583,0.00016976602],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005303659,0.0004388315,0.4268949,0.00029467457,0.000102348065,0.0025779337,0.11850771,0.0005670632,0.00013789786,0.37146482,0.008703199,0.070257515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026642103,0.00029864433,0.43592438,0.0023279267,0.00009710682,0.0050359406,0.37578252,0.00094374106,0.00037567073,0.0693569,0.1097582,0.000072381044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039316308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03895838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9606837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030551811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003996867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07817489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396571388","doi":"10.3138/cjwl_35_02_01","title":"Aftermath of a Storm: Women and Reparations for Residential School Abuses","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Storm; Political science; History; Sociology; Law; Geography; Meteorology","score_opus":0.0401771665093883,"score_gpt":0.35824081109403794,"score_spread":0.31806364458464964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396571388","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75210184,0.006967549,0.00064219814,0.15295051,0.001182026,0.000063824315,0.000059779948,0.00003248066,0.085999675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97438264,0.0025473968,0.00016343937,0.009001065,0.00022900532,0.00002123538,0.000014068751,0.000021742075,0.0136194425],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949039,0.0026080655,0.00011025863,0.00020414645,0.00053166505,0.0016418347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99670875,0.0011161984,0.00063419546,0.00015757688,0.00045966558,0.0009235307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004016719,0.00023357283,0.00037541447,0.0009853364,0.03823774,0.0060140253,0.001333652,0.0032783507,0.006537388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011730938,0.0002856399,0.00029838627,0.0010799279,0.017810695,0.003774413,0.0074934787,0.0053361827,0.0005062787],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029735833,0.0000626332,0.01741582,0.00006399522,0.000009368938,0.0026330296,0.9109055,0.000034323955,0.00020220538,0.027193915,0.018484691,0.022964822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002730524,0.000025340783,0.006869872,0.0001808324,0.0000057187945,0.00048121347,0.9230514,0.000019250583,0.00008416268,0.0014790434,0.067789145,0.0000113462165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13343373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3013819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8665663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008893268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0133274235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2653141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400521338","doi":"10.3138/cjwl_2024_03_08","title":"Learning, Living, and Teaching Anishinaabe Law: A Tribute to Jean Borrows","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribute; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.01344486030079948,"score_gpt":0.2740879883477797,"score_spread":0.2606431280469802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400521338","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.115977,0.043560036,0.00076711946,0.7600013,0.007402356,0.000116550684,0.00012677773,0.00009236163,0.07195649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60250694,0.044350002,0.0036323632,0.1705789,0.004173729,0.00016789424,0.00009073857,0.00027964564,0.17421974],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960223,0.001174719,0.000098248966,0.00037686358,0.0015820074,0.0007459086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915064,0.0018439445,0.00040305423,0.00012091644,0.0023881563,0.0037375025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034566678,0.0004880732,0.0005952711,0.0011670297,0.024821036,0.0066971,0.0012607481,0.0028738505,0.0027904795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067921863,0.00036184333,0.000257179,0.001188532,0.016821468,0.004031658,0.0041868757,0.007646514,0.00049315236],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055737833,0.0000946611,0.008383671,0.0004413494,0.000027756732,0.0023367319,0.44938502,0.00017992256,0.0010331793,0.043559927,0.43454134,0.059960693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075913313,0.000037484875,0.004482138,0.00047277578,0.000012230524,0.001084181,0.31045413,0.00011864845,0.00024657458,0.0033115419,0.67968595,0.000086755404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.61315435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78223264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38684565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01809186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032763574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7782477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402182563","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.00-00-1-3-x","title":"Le stéréotype de la « bonne grand-mère » comme facteur de clémence des tribunaux : analyse des biais de genre à l’épreuve de la détermination de la peine chez les femmes aînées","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06396846998687526,"score_gpt":0.3669065873764772,"score_spread":0.3029381173896019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402182563","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9336534,0.0007692377,0.0014833033,0.001842815,0.00004616236,0.00005129207,0.00007276674,0.000004287524,0.062076677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986558,0.00037225735,0.0006639547,0.00020877882,0.000007498378,0.00003336487,0.00003561852,0.0000058304827,0.012114714],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876773,0.00061137596,0.000028647279,0.00013228478,0.00024243136,0.00021750793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979075,0.00082510617,0.00027599125,0.00012912648,0.000584962,0.00027732976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019111943,0.00023030768,0.00026458548,0.0010387567,0.0060364227,0.0031367482,0.00068654853,0.0006278361,0.006445195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004784822,0.00020319513,0.00017202464,0.0013239805,0.005733592,0.0017382362,0.0016211469,0.0011611566,0.00035149572],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007730329,0.000050771392,0.0724534,0.00016573163,0.00002387948,0.000650842,0.8252038,0.000117739175,0.0011989163,0.061638612,0.0018035263,0.036615502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006463694,0.000058122398,0.17158227,0.00035916996,0.000025855392,0.00025019227,0.7748365,0.00029327226,0.00046122365,0.004651313,0.04744234,0.000033345957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2585505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5197742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7414495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063914875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006103139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51409113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409674518","doi":"10.3138/cjwl-05-x","title":"Left Wanting: A Case Comment on <i>R. v Kirkpatrick</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.0309976237075008,"score_gpt":0.294895670142851,"score_spread":0.2638980464353502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409674518","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014859668,0.0028851265,0.00097110396,0.88385427,0.0044788085,0.00010063653,0.00021527556,0.00006916311,0.09256599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.081132464,0.001373775,0.00059035444,0.88514775,0.0016043574,0.0000625244,0.00006466312,0.000082095125,0.029942015],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98552793,0.0022458418,0.0005994497,0.0021561172,0.0046600546,0.004810675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900365,0.0061893594,0.0003844118,0.00025742187,0.0018907936,0.0012414978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009025153,0.00081833935,0.0010397468,0.0012785121,0.0322423,0.009966932,0.0071021155,0.04481408,0.0046064816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02383769,0.0012903025,0.0018550387,0.0018283199,0.015219407,0.0052297097,0.004804328,0.059917916,0.0011332219],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007235859,0.000060969356,0.0024626874,0.00012663772,0.000046411937,0.008067559,0.022423238,0.00035468227,0.0010945474,0.26468444,0.6904691,0.01013728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000726332,0.00007774064,0.0041287825,0.0008068809,0.0001316668,0.0028347804,0.031055385,0.0007984857,0.0016993084,0.027112797,0.93083584,0.0004457286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82337606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88145155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17662394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040081028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.064449884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3553282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409674543","doi":"10.3138/cjwl-04-x","title":"The Murky Circumstances of Consent in Canada: A Commentary on <i>R. v Kirkpatrick</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.027221916312663245,"score_gpt":0.29954327072214665,"score_spread":0.2723213544094834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409674543","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005034788,0.024578271,0.00032037427,0.93264395,0.0045436984,0.000029303254,0.00011198963,0.000020207457,0.032717496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18538152,0.018038403,0.0006243797,0.7761112,0.005668887,0.000064982945,0.0000550574,0.00007699259,0.013978589],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9786401,0.004809708,0.0010945274,0.0020834042,0.00769331,0.0056789154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.966301,0.02096445,0.0014877284,0.00050358824,0.007577212,0.0031660437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011578629,0.00061520125,0.001247157,0.0015306168,0.029773798,0.010842606,0.0080062505,0.040319048,0.00241109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04198053,0.00079625176,0.0014010259,0.0028118494,0.037123043,0.0041113445,0.0036343737,0.040221244,0.0004030354],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051552637,0.000021358042,0.0013758485,0.00041694226,0.000034297635,0.0022151717,0.03908524,0.00041945727,0.00025116233,0.2818212,0.6567558,0.017551972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064319116,0.00002790304,0.0040083705,0.0026676229,0.00011026925,0.00080413657,0.039317057,0.0005860026,0.0003913006,0.044757348,0.9069586,0.00030709058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9772734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98565334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14491588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14491588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24655297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9917764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409675351","doi":"10.3138/cjwl-02-x","title":"Reasoning from Remedy in <i>R. v Morgentaler</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016044874679068545,"score_gpt":0.2740055504505927,"score_spread":0.25796067577152415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409675351","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051653188,0.010284929,0.010777827,0.3973632,0.0032577375,0.00023056005,0.00023490383,0.00013070216,0.5260669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62455624,0.0030682816,0.0064209145,0.29492283,0.0013403088,0.00024969978,0.00007833255,0.00008872348,0.06927472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99225616,0.0023313304,0.00038712347,0.0012721448,0.0017847446,0.0019685351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970709,0.0019227932,0.00026248174,0.0001787408,0.00040043084,0.00016464804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075932466,0.00045221843,0.0004535814,0.0014092213,0.010852486,0.006671876,0.0022365917,0.02150921,0.0035192976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013516945,0.0005278378,0.0010876101,0.00075416884,0.017374322,0.004372945,0.003312994,0.01528625,0.0005246588],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075029293,0.0000066447674,0.00019185428,0.000025146517,0.000005021918,0.0005482038,0.0037863473,0.000095701034,0.00020395455,0.9744435,0.01872044,0.0019658266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052336276,0.00005238122,0.0011753129,0.00057502114,0.000044732176,0.00095538417,0.0065688617,0.00044939236,0.001967983,0.39488748,0.5931485,0.00012259358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09085552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10199106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90914446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011019343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012242146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18065333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414109541","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.03.x","title":"Treating Male Violence against Women and Girls as Hate in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hate crime; Human factors and ergonomics; Suicide prevention; Criminal offence; Poison control; Social issues","score_opus":0.01262781768549617,"score_gpt":0.2565469117318541,"score_spread":0.24391909404635795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414109541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8516162,0.009295315,0.0007151752,0.056329362,0.0004887067,0.00024086783,0.0012931669,0.000042730684,0.07997839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9789554,0.004634663,0.0005362516,0.0049256235,0.000039230963,0.000035753463,0.00024866223,0.000019352108,0.010605006],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99590695,0.00042870382,0.00012527377,0.00028239875,0.0013979359,0.0018587357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99492645,0.00038268507,0.0006280929,0.00010281251,0.0017348537,0.0022251059],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019116865,0.0002280248,0.00044073563,0.0018212517,0.019364825,0.0035844673,0.0018196953,0.00115407,0.0035984342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064854915,0.00041834757,0.00049502915,0.003029904,0.0038050527,0.00092627626,0.003208227,0.0025373118,0.00013540105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013514639,0.00023843964,0.5832938,0.0005971028,0.00013176732,0.002325736,0.14962889,0.0005295158,0.0013440663,0.04135888,0.05874991,0.16166668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024110414,0.00008381017,0.69211066,0.0008828234,0.000072618524,0.0007269998,0.17880946,0.000618663,0.0007309938,0.0018989645,0.12391429,0.00012665197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99852234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99953294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12280007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12280007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2376055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.890981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7140288330","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.36.2.04","title":"Mary Jane Mossman, Quiet Rebels: A History of Ontario Women Lawyers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"QUIET; Government (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Narrative; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.01576555779353932,"score_gpt":0.21485970298345614,"score_spread":0.1990941451899168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7140288330","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04583595,0.06476601,0.00048097968,0.6926977,0.00603749,0.00012000056,0.00041928512,0.000059908314,0.18958269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.284558,0.03843644,0.0005744922,0.108860895,0.0014351887,0.0001330251,0.0001431895,0.00022536993,0.5656334],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99445915,0.0011658676,0.00015366565,0.00037483883,0.0013035795,0.0025429004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99051875,0.0020265777,0.0005855063,0.00014665074,0.0019313742,0.004791082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003947613,0.00054927473,0.0006436792,0.0028260455,0.07641778,0.012851739,0.0028944102,0.010293449,0.021220814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009748,0.00096635235,0.00033234403,0.005171662,0.023178501,0.006433163,0.005954148,0.010923785,0.0015648431],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005513244,0.000046052846,0.0036350945,0.00023140102,0.000014538262,0.0010363432,0.36827508,0.000056850535,0.00025132697,0.07900529,0.52645195,0.020940969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003990249,0.0000059156473,0.0029476208,0.00021999168,0.000005207165,0.00006352544,0.11157118,0.000009164929,0.000039492923,0.0011002963,0.8840123,0.000021324062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98318106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99719894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15954566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15954566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20142835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9748079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7140310375","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.36.2.02","title":"Joanne Martel, Too Few to Matter: Institutional Inertia in the Prisoning of Women in Québec and Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Inertia; Wage; Agency (philosophy)","score_opus":0.010796396411607687,"score_gpt":0.24535554539993762,"score_spread":0.23455914898832994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7140310375","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35323882,0.020505914,0.0003072571,0.60443616,0.0020302287,0.0001322517,0.0015209229,0.0000250589,0.017803347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8922522,0.019391568,0.00075774296,0.0552969,0.00063116197,0.00016284837,0.00042886828,0.00010718457,0.030971501],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972371,0.0006638023,0.000098898956,0.0001983774,0.00059371296,0.0012081173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98443604,0.0029107446,0.0010927875,0.00016122842,0.005092782,0.006306365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033860821,0.0003936238,0.00078580744,0.002568443,0.028504724,0.006709852,0.0025221151,0.0035641259,0.008276469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013553319,0.0005406595,0.00049871247,0.004043011,0.005618057,0.0035339633,0.0024639925,0.0047814064,0.00038464027],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017612692,0.00020383186,0.32207543,0.00035150332,0.00014176559,0.0013055288,0.16327724,0.0006664988,0.0002983658,0.017332476,0.43824935,0.05592195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021712971,0.000042220472,0.30013743,0.0011775439,0.000093014496,0.00023530604,0.60505617,0.0003216321,0.00017043985,0.0020839078,0.09046596,0.00019459403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99396604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99837035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06316472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06316472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13120282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45829427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7140336149","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.36.2.01","title":"Treating Male Violence against Women and Girls as Hate in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hate crime; Human factors and ergonomics; Suicide prevention; Criminal offence; Poison control; Social issues","score_opus":0.016063075468619785,"score_gpt":0.2642360604888481,"score_spread":0.24817298502022833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7140336149","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9556888,0.0039589456,0.00016950288,0.011895797,0.00014285516,0.00013572093,0.00063792977,0.000010936389,0.027359573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98965466,0.0035457523,0.00020684062,0.0016689005,0.000019546118,0.00003232725,0.0001928877,0.000009293783,0.0046696905],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99598324,0.0005333648,0.00013085896,0.00027663636,0.0014300941,0.0016458362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951355,0.00048184374,0.0008463047,0.00012419338,0.0016999238,0.0017121801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021675145,0.0002771684,0.00069094833,0.0023559246,0.023187738,0.0039800825,0.0018257344,0.0008933129,0.0036123677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067621632,0.0004904718,0.0005560595,0.0045205797,0.004246685,0.0012288123,0.0036632542,0.0026396108,0.00016108435],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009498317,0.00028739715,0.60305357,0.0004398898,0.00010753759,0.0011258483,0.28258944,0.00018869943,0.0006854311,0.017274646,0.020818235,0.073334284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012299741,0.00007467819,0.63712,0.00059476757,0.00004400231,0.00036979228,0.32134226,0.00020890318,0.00031475586,0.0006826813,0.039160684,0.0000751399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99792564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99928695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.097569615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.097569615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17958315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70792043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}