{"meta":{"query_hash":"8a71e7925071","filters":{"venue":"Canadian journal of family law"},"cohort_total":28,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":28,"exported":28,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/8a71e7925071","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Canadian+journal+of+family+law"},"results":[{"id":"W2783109536","doi":"","title":"Le Droit Myope","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Migration, Identity, and Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.030615827755737946,"score_gpt":0.29593595805974415,"score_spread":0.2653201303040062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783109536","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3811219,0.001619283,0.00013132962,0.013319243,0.0010583835,0.00009435621,0.000007401913,0.0000095614405,0.60263854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931669,0.00020632749,0.00011236611,0.004897812,0.0006331424,1.3258837e-7,7.0876587e-7,0.0000032155256,0.0009793912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992288,0.00005598285,0.0002057026,0.000054890366,0.00019227703,0.00026236748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886507,0.000013262115,0.00010472354,0.00006709849,0.0001969506,0.0007528986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056282326,0.00004273001,0.00011377034,0.000104804276,0.00079100655,0.00012748111,0.00021917582,0.00005544199,0.00009903836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055762026,0.000046961013,0.00006010445,0.00015040896,0.00013800403,0.00029970583,0.0000011430218,0.00012562517,0.00002323651],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022046183,0.000008025242,0.002834243,0.000002069211,0.000004456228,0.00003811662,0.0044804257,0.000004234111,0.000023263625,0.95694715,0.034459244,0.001196558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002488418,0.000114880124,0.12490598,0.000031593812,0.000012180069,0.000010059393,0.0037193142,0.0000015310301,0.000012751972,0.13272092,0.7381079,0.00011404093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43127897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95859563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82422626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017762838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050649866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8985068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902752104","doi":"","title":"Moral Evils v. Health and Safety Evils: The Case of an Ovum ‘Obtained’ From a ‘Donor’ and Used By the ‘Donor’ in Her Own Surrogate Pregnancy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Egg donation; Pregnancy; Gynecology; Andrology; Medicine; Obstetrics; Biology; Genetics","score_opus":0.04741376017114965,"score_gpt":0.3062397410306981,"score_spread":0.25882598085954844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902752104","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9535946,0.030782811,0.0000070198716,0.014378722,0.00015078112,0.0004664574,0.00006124348,0.000007499394,0.0005508134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99684817,0.0007748625,0.0001763991,0.0020137026,0.00012522945,0.000004226087,0.0000039864226,0.000015986403,0.00003741934],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984824,0.0002073613,0.000554296,0.00022961196,0.00012017954,0.00040615333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982562,0.00013676194,0.0003186095,0.0004460632,0.00019046234,0.0006519064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008333056,0.00015744755,0.00045206645,0.00013292614,0.00027717452,0.000031982363,0.00016655106,0.00009717274,0.000013920049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027417083,0.00008931343,0.000044024484,0.00022637662,0.0011041133,0.00017468513,0.000020560414,0.00043512424,6.599662e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020694407,0.00032919162,0.6141027,0.00077234063,0.0005440383,0.005948915,0.030287093,0.000009538694,0.001543702,0.0198781,0.011283719,0.31323123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02286237,0.019128153,0.7020451,0.009172494,0.00048168303,0.016644182,0.07627599,0.00054995244,0.002646131,0.03308554,0.11579733,0.0013110795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12978666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23033729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31192014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014191325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012579449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87600815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004913135","doi":"","title":"(Some) Mothers Know Best: A Case Comment on MM v TB and the Plight of Indigenous Mothers in Child Welfare and Adoption Proceedings","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Welfare; Economic growth; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.02118420762285752,"score_gpt":0.28836404222592305,"score_spread":0.26717983460306555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004913135","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95249367,0.0067350846,8.829549e-7,0.034084074,0.0001504257,0.0003403828,0.000017320985,0.0000020856464,0.0061761034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903532,0.0009494931,0.00007861058,0.008195207,0.00037767112,0.000002333371,6.748708e-7,0.00001691105,0.0000258925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990882,0.000040807903,0.00035102494,0.00011236071,0.00017454845,0.00023300144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989708,0.00005445582,0.00018624197,0.000095448355,0.00023131914,0.00046169956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070362905,0.000113500995,0.0002931521,0.00022456888,0.00026074873,0.00002879493,0.00007666108,0.00013452316,0.000010210341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000071172566,0.00007754605,0.000040224277,0.00014428476,0.00050087663,0.00007688898,0.000007812583,0.000558572,7.850826e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028470624,0.00043313374,0.102809675,0.0024577654,0.000604288,0.0106825875,0.3941234,0.000022570037,0.00010738608,0.4307013,0.005391159,0.0498197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.023101449,0.012815844,0.05346061,0.0062842956,0.0006684612,0.018967109,0.10818609,0.00025292003,0.00034627147,0.0037757112,0.7712656,0.0008756117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054168638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029289499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76587445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016187949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026680605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98842347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005267199","doi":"","title":"Prestation Compensatoire Et Union De Fait En Droit Québécois : Étude Critique Du Discours Judiciaire","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Healthcare Systems and Practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.05178023628263907,"score_gpt":0.4094153229177707,"score_spread":0.35763508663513166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005267199","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4508933,0.011867263,0.0030081174,0.4697619,0.011535278,0.00083592744,0.0004131479,0.000021448957,0.05166359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9747686,0.0009782851,0.0007820672,0.017871452,0.0036235177,0.000008502504,0.0000130153785,0.00006746473,0.0018871381],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882677,0.008838329,0.00124509,0.00024428152,0.00035450995,0.0010500917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99396324,0.0011678656,0.001027779,0.00031016432,0.0012736374,0.0022572896],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007579762,0.00027669716,0.0005603371,0.00027938277,0.0013532323,0.00012086466,0.00040439086,0.00066939066,0.0006291592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011576677,0.00028927284,0.00014961498,0.00028123698,0.00048721037,0.001162416,0.000025372867,0.0019593788,0.00018084722],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007415322,0.00007576525,0.019439466,0.001030266,0.00019312609,0.0013018479,0.106289536,0.000037212303,0.00013337345,0.71937084,0.120102145,0.03195225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064030086,0.0006209265,0.11754193,0.0038950103,0.00010123473,0.00037199468,0.039845552,0.00011179594,0.000010788061,0.0064276857,0.8301543,0.0002785091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88186723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9857533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7129432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017046815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020646472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039067449","doi":"","title":"Book Review: A Parent-Partner Status for American Family Law by Merle H. Weiner","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Psychology; Genealogy; Political science; History","score_opus":0.039273711452433996,"score_gpt":0.3395010143025037,"score_spread":0.3002273028500697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3039067449","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004804295,0.5467082,0.00011849,0.021592278,0.003202416,0.0009634959,0.0004360544,0.000025109553,0.42214963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85746473,0.02850346,0.00017427666,0.1028586,0.0023994013,0.000037167683,0.0000124253365,0.000058113616,0.008491811],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803364,0.000115042945,0.0005101728,0.00018904988,0.0003986718,0.0007534335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969669,0.000064821455,0.0008055117,0.00028364695,0.0005579814,0.0013211275],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076035946,0.000168048,0.0005329464,0.000051478986,0.0020053522,0.00044799436,0.00071003404,0.00007657654,0.00010200302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032900512,0.00014596598,0.00020571412,0.00010399721,0.0012263679,0.00077257573,0.000014633205,0.00020324538,0.000022426048],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010393324,0.000010291359,0.0003419348,0.00006912588,0.000046290785,0.000026809936,0.000592725,5.605897e-7,0.00007454852,0.029498322,0.9675267,0.0018023009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030599508,0.00012928688,0.0004024285,0.00046013427,0.00006137388,0.0000023542227,0.0007844738,8.745037e-7,0.000018896219,0.0005531322,0.99708116,0.0001999013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66362697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.54740864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8526604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002490811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021391269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039642515","doi":"","title":"A Feminist Critique of Quebec v. A. : Evaluating the Supreme Court's Divided Opinion on Section 15 and Common Law Support Obligations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Law; Supreme court; Political science; Common law; Majority opinion; Business","score_opus":0.08359551058275173,"score_gpt":0.3771282442904529,"score_spread":0.29353273370770117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3039642515","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.750957,0.0005789443,0.000016644331,0.013142756,0.0020661568,0.0003096978,0.000053072752,0.000007996337,0.23286772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99807066,0.000038487146,0.000016678503,0.0009640756,0.0007260259,0.0000028728311,0.000001492417,0.000007660266,0.000172045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987978,0.0002083644,0.00035100407,0.00009179957,0.0003403758,0.00021067615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998524,0.00017305076,0.00048354804,0.00016660124,0.0003513119,0.00030150585],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018152657,0.000080282865,0.00020123224,0.00005330184,0.0025940342,0.00045100934,0.0003358301,0.000090814836,0.000022787151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038739512,0.00006409844,0.00006209016,0.00006842061,0.0008560957,0.00038217832,0.000012813367,0.0002198,0.000001561087],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003094778,0.000022548917,0.014144494,0.000048949245,0.000051627536,0.000020034218,0.01552287,0.000022355967,0.0005797857,0.9581141,0.0074463543,0.003995947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015855638,0.0017636094,0.1787227,0.0021006288,0.00013769635,0.000069942966,0.030914463,0.00006547297,0.00071850314,0.062263533,0.7210741,0.000583794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90152687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9789939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89585054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001464236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017527113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99870443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044244435","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Autonomous Motherhood? A Socio-Legal Study of Choice and Constraint by Susan B. Boyd, Dorothy E. Chunn, Fiona Kelly, and Wanda Wiegers","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constraint (computer-aided design); Sociology; Gender studies; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.021684932551733455,"score_gpt":0.2985832967222767,"score_spread":0.27689836417054325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3044244435","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6799446,0.29454613,0.0000036626427,0.01846155,0.00019286963,0.00082768773,0.000044930926,0.0000115286975,0.005967095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97975624,0.012929671,0.00008974207,0.006653561,0.00009775107,0.0000058852693,0.00000142735,0.00001768059,0.0004480708],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987809,0.00004657886,0.0004732787,0.00022498902,0.0001771345,0.00029708765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982014,0.00004747774,0.00048893946,0.00042755462,0.00022572838,0.00060893333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004693006,0.00016075815,0.0005938691,0.0001320907,0.00032889447,0.000046929596,0.00018566422,0.000094733594,0.000051635383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035983193,0.00013045347,0.00006006741,0.000047271544,0.00091369596,0.00019728058,0.000022384118,0.00037576252,9.2075044e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018668098,0.00029789004,0.1941293,0.0020905877,0.00062437565,0.0010066102,0.0012626755,7.390203e-7,0.0016018242,0.0018595759,0.741169,0.055770744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034458092,0.002278414,0.12126999,0.0012881177,0.0002156251,0.0005777279,0.0016981169,0.0000020485759,0.00019244468,0.00014974963,0.86868805,0.00019392841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014744207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003631398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29981166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011667665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00096635777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9918167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044670361","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Petra Nordqvist and Carol Smart, Relative Strangers: Family Life, Genes and Donor Conception","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"History of Science and Medicine","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology","score_opus":0.05997318476299163,"score_gpt":0.24171930320122142,"score_spread":0.1817461184382298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3044670361","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058549352,0.8520267,0.000016432445,0.004163641,0.0013135936,0.00024809112,0.000048939855,0.0000076675105,0.083625585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7294192,0.05439537,0.00019518723,0.17551242,0.0034547185,0.000012910688,0.000017031454,0.000049959013,0.03694325],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991722,0.00004431358,0.00028390865,0.00011601209,0.00017884857,0.00020468389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841917,0.000023346081,0.0001517965,0.00007719996,0.00026552714,0.0010629755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039782157,0.00011359997,0.0002661749,0.00011223372,0.00027320496,0.00007249555,0.0000982542,0.000033207747,0.00022193353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047741032,0.00009134789,0.00004186105,0.000029316441,0.001183383,0.00063607487,0.0000043395908,0.000171512,0.00001532927],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001332502,0.000005776071,0.00027736707,0.0000861961,0.000033215532,0.00011287003,0.017294817,8.324477e-7,0.00008067523,0.0068392577,0.9712946,0.0039610816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046426686,0.00025330155,0.0006412985,0.00044432338,0.000072643226,0.000035104367,0.0065268595,0.0000030189435,0.0000017404825,0.00007159852,0.99137545,0.00011038958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00890468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028762413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7976313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009184713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007055879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048446512","doi":"","title":"Townshend v. Townshend & Buttar v. Buttar : Gifts, Exclusions, and Intentions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics","score_opus":0.06655443817021048,"score_gpt":0.33343272735938606,"score_spread":0.26687828918917555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048446512","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41000044,0.0018187196,0.00023199852,0.034762483,0.0010855722,0.0002505793,0.00013203136,0.000015948834,0.5517022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996146,0.00026485472,0.00057640544,0.0008308277,0.00042762747,0.0000029488326,0.0000015356026,0.00001009219,0.001739694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888784,0.00005784629,0.0002905917,0.0001373374,0.00026347878,0.0003629332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980633,0.000049532337,0.00025886696,0.0003141518,0.0002767085,0.0010374117],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065194804,0.000100416975,0.00018023953,0.00009737343,0.0039034637,0.00054206466,0.0006548535,0.00009068627,0.00013082007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029554937,0.00009383429,0.0001014494,0.000070481175,0.0008750455,0.00052236416,0.000051665535,0.00026795367,0.000017736234],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046092014,0.000020300911,0.0067358883,0.000006018589,0.000041824413,0.000080744896,0.002744592,0.0000040636332,0.00033729195,0.96919996,0.015272806,0.005551931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021862028,0.000029463286,0.042478383,0.000051313127,0.00003288284,0.00001668531,0.0030854484,0.0000031535224,0.000023765815,0.010154226,0.9437786,0.00012751175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20865245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5599402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9590457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022408593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014466034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048599398","doi":"","title":"Consent, Coercion, and Shared Parenting: Ruffudeen-Coutts v Coutts","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); Psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05136468322551728,"score_gpt":0.3043930437155806,"score_spread":0.25302836049006333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048599398","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46598035,0.006693127,0.0002506315,0.009736799,0.0043377765,0.0003746816,0.00010978855,0.00005561708,0.51246125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967422,0.000038896724,0.00032045937,0.0013199792,0.0005599413,0.0000011156512,0.000003197201,0.00001614738,0.0009980673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833655,0.00024064694,0.0003846929,0.00015635951,0.00036836002,0.0005133985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976,0.00025117726,0.00026027224,0.00016034098,0.00038404585,0.0013441326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011134427,0.0001296797,0.00027687466,0.00013365748,0.00065936893,0.0003228533,0.00040882087,0.00012757172,0.00011476612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00089234393,0.00012747118,0.00007745343,0.00019527931,0.00089287374,0.00030924022,0.000017788643,0.00026572295,0.00006152752],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004458633,0.000045202472,0.11579744,0.000061599705,0.00016289526,0.00051637867,0.16374148,0.000023027393,0.00035567238,0.53840417,0.1782839,0.0025636596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039464346,0.000052718467,0.006415377,0.000090669535,0.000033809236,0.000011878108,0.003145872,0.00000924807,0.000012673343,0.0028633985,0.9868019,0.00016780253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04722714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20334613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.808518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017225454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013532345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9591175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048850375","doi":"","title":"Book Review: D’un océan à l’autre . . . recension de Nicole Laviolette et Julie Audet, L’essentiel du droit de la famille dans les provinces et territoires de common law au Canada","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016499674226058882,"score_gpt":0.280056274338826,"score_spread":0.26355660011276716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048850375","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2082367,0.27270868,0.000023188735,0.33181718,0.0022519252,0.0006690233,0.00038727708,0.000027902324,0.18387811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8197124,0.08440149,0.00046594624,0.082973436,0.0011472204,0.000018756044,0.000012403773,0.000062438354,0.011205919],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954504,0.0015603902,0.0007448872,0.00032412022,0.0006264065,0.001293803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99632347,0.00044739206,0.0009823403,0.0003875524,0.0003266137,0.0015326259],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023423668,0.00042214495,0.00079151994,0.0000429595,0.0048987037,0.0005186359,0.0013399291,0.00035617925,0.000104407125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005418133,0.0003935042,0.0003109647,0.00011800716,0.0029066035,0.0008492814,0.00011311957,0.001083961,0.000005115082],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016676475,0.00006326645,0.033119816,0.00037514992,0.0002294441,0.0016242979,0.010504909,0.000094152085,0.0002731999,0.045060977,0.9044901,0.004147999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000443692,0.00007566758,0.06746161,0.0037423107,0.00023294918,0.00013057576,0.0035615787,0.000024264447,0.00013069196,0.00066313735,0.9231029,0.00043061745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99794537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6114757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067435913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011460705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3059442353","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Families and the Law: Cases and Commentary by Mary Jane Mossman","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Genealogy; History; Political science","score_opus":0.020164165656455603,"score_gpt":0.26153677700058947,"score_spread":0.24137261134413387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3059442353","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035535343,0.8905409,0.000004352368,0.044717144,0.00051026384,0.00022693179,0.00006309327,0.0000044061517,0.02839755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6632603,0.14676233,0.000077858596,0.18848349,0.00030961237,0.0000034727755,0.000008181338,0.0000134312095,0.0010813443],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998905,0.000288577,0.0002612714,0.00006875739,0.00017286075,0.00030350772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986884,0.0004147813,0.00013196476,0.00009556675,0.000067489564,0.0006018242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011555176,0.00009652468,0.00021295313,0.0000441039,0.0010232355,0.0000874984,0.00015998904,0.000066131935,0.000041288982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008558,0.00006704279,0.000056536705,0.00008617944,0.0015237929,0.0003790719,0.000015625215,0.00025002513,0.0000024275705],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007984702,0.000008366599,0.005375724,0.000036214926,0.000042803924,0.000028185968,0.003009691,5.1717893e-7,0.0000048250954,0.088305466,0.90244657,0.00073368364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033511725,0.00002299838,0.0031069044,0.00019586328,0.00006998174,0.00005961016,0.003588344,0.000004062921,5.3663723e-7,0.00048236788,0.9920396,0.00009456552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.124073595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12630285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7437786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000085131986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016717013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88963985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3080503576","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Transforming Law’s Family: The Legal Recognition of Planned Lesbian Motherhood by Fiona Kelly","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lesbian; Gender studies; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.08938747715330296,"score_gpt":0.29253082046172363,"score_spread":0.20314334330842065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3080503576","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0098013,0.24334134,0.000051185478,0.006863688,0.0009846514,0.0004888077,0.00030620614,0.000015307558,0.7381475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8519319,0.027961582,0.00014363349,0.115994185,0.00048269337,0.000010390176,0.000015701582,0.00003947284,0.0034203948],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827194,0.00026567336,0.00056173734,0.00013205648,0.00036000324,0.00040856548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998804,0.000098807985,0.00027938624,0.00014073956,0.0002869587,0.0003901234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011529102,0.00014738392,0.0003536849,0.000052328396,0.00078943244,0.000042964035,0.0004186338,0.000102593964,0.00019020915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006357017,0.00011565459,0.0001633561,0.00015474285,0.00088400446,0.00036081692,0.000006014029,0.00025490392,0.000010724521],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074403455,0.00007579987,0.0001367506,0.00020679273,0.00028761465,0.00009105361,0.13185468,6.546823e-7,0.0003008573,0.07156107,0.7850981,0.010312229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002578647,0.00018764401,0.00015086925,0.00038439027,0.00007924863,0.000009992222,0.046709433,3.0324787e-7,0.00018185926,0.0013198953,0.95056593,0.00015254342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16625486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3441779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84213066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000120057346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008376347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8392971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3080640902","doi":"","title":"Share the Wealth? Kerr v Baranow and the \"Joint Family Venture\"","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Joint venture; Business; Joint (building); Business administration; Engineering; Structural engineering","score_opus":0.0658104394636366,"score_gpt":0.26196873119723174,"score_spread":0.19615829173359514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3080640902","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39004907,0.017472379,0.000048463753,0.028666416,0.0030903518,0.00052164093,0.000043723343,0.000018093706,0.5600898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934664,0.00048819114,0.000024377112,0.005200594,0.00047461022,0.0000025008044,4.377948e-7,0.000008024951,0.00033487013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988825,0.00022259177,0.00026472722,0.00008454173,0.00024592807,0.00029973293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897,0.0000733935,0.00017827218,0.00014270587,0.00017380623,0.00046184458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013582151,0.00008594239,0.00016384841,0.00005689625,0.0011349367,0.00013426726,0.00034297793,0.000074453375,0.00016355288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007623341,0.00004925056,0.00011298189,0.0001322964,0.0010512718,0.00017011046,0.000011758862,0.0002948324,0.000010770571],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009264009,0.000014999074,0.0015996675,0.000010784337,0.0001017125,0.00011772759,0.10314643,0.0000025671302,0.00007395996,0.8568748,0.022909803,0.015054877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005691899,0.000063639935,0.051338166,0.00005495611,0.000043153068,0.00002202544,0.010995688,0.00000685348,0.000010606759,0.006172083,0.93063366,0.00008995969],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17532742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27008247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9077239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000882866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008852362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87291306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081446521","doi":"","title":"Introducing the Next Class of Bastard: An Assessment of the Definitional Implications of the Succession Law Reform Act for After-Born Children","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Child Welfare and Adoption","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ecological succession; Law; Class (philosophy); Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04932346918375177,"score_gpt":0.31003386914698433,"score_spread":0.26071039996323253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081446521","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9639103,0.00011630417,0.00009770423,0.0063426686,0.00030909348,0.0002886354,0.00021875757,0.0000017548742,0.028714824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99869937,0.000018771878,0.00040734673,0.0006647438,0.00018451632,0.0000043701657,0.00000407378,0.0000063510442,0.000010458175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990165,0.00014482786,0.00035678846,0.00008026879,0.00023716745,0.00016440004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987528,0.000062378116,0.00046612916,0.00026509335,0.0003261734,0.00012745096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007351425,0.000066446635,0.00013480643,0.00004108316,0.0005600145,0.000026248741,0.00055651483,0.000053970038,0.00004961937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038733106,0.000035298817,0.00016927718,0.00018201044,0.0005356996,0.00026527164,0.000020251633,0.00015754835,1.372485e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000246251,0.00006324951,0.068119146,0.000012361202,0.00005259728,2.6275083e-7,0.0046589915,0.000043126354,0.0009914141,0.92313063,0.00031683175,0.002586749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018385705,0.00007370817,0.98318976,0.00010034738,0.000055031975,0.000004150889,0.0017243401,0.0000042727524,0.00045487267,0.009196477,0.0049615405,0.00005166818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07856006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35877675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9150706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018239254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012100352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9275759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118739551","doi":"","title":"The \"Family\"—and \"Families\" in Law: A Review of Archana Parashar and Franscesca Dominello, The Family In Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.0634057558751246,"score_gpt":0.3427713802528224,"score_spread":0.2793656243776978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3118739551","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00043023194,0.9544379,0.0000019211075,0.0009736226,0.00059390673,0.0008242904,0.00007288799,0.000003873581,0.04266136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0033650193,0.9929659,0.00001899124,0.0030548393,0.00041665402,0.000024770103,0.0000043544997,0.000032956486,0.0001165474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959296,0.001018786,0.0015385544,0.0003141298,0.0005329597,0.00066599314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99710476,0.00080904254,0.0008635574,0.0003947065,0.00026655148,0.00056136586],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004805603,0.0003822727,0.0015828495,0.00024851866,0.0007489689,0.00019623146,0.00091797503,0.00032827645,0.000017711918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018047645,0.00024070095,0.00038298365,0.0006699103,0.0039807362,0.0002340003,0.000046248282,0.00090265594,0.000005491912],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035976544,0.000043772427,0.00014938679,0.014128538,0.00030576147,0.00026278305,0.0075039486,5.677549e-7,0.000003202896,0.5754876,0.01228916,0.38978928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028531018,0.00008595935,0.00024057817,0.039453443,0.00021695318,0.000025066296,0.0010377576,8.1312163e-7,1.2733908e-7,0.0010885785,0.9573307,0.00023468406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31918737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7872288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9450416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028918867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002316016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124959456","doi":"","title":"A v B and Attorney General of Quebec (Eric v Lola) —The Implications for Cohabiting Couples Outside Quebec","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Supreme court; Legislature; Law; Order (exchange); Sociology; Poverty; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.05099248566382994,"score_gpt":0.30064280178728814,"score_spread":0.2496503161234582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124959456","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9655862,0.0019224175,0.0004310326,0.02273377,0.00037510012,0.00035913504,0.00005916204,0.0000091121665,0.008524071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970377,0.000054933174,0.0008084188,0.0008390215,0.00052910595,0.00000868846,0.0000015014027,0.000008254693,0.00071238005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903923,0.00010826352,0.00031638023,0.00009503619,0.00013537909,0.00030573324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846095,0.00037674306,0.00028693915,0.0000858775,0.0004363362,0.000353177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006691625,0.00009180714,0.000227792,0.000037355705,0.0010922395,0.00010943785,0.00025385572,0.000063122585,0.0000057599855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053058285,0.00006613757,0.00010401211,0.000118086034,0.00087894103,0.00016463496,0.000012092892,0.0001150288,9.4393835e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013556456,0.000012221465,0.046683304,0.000047978705,0.00016717133,0.000001959409,0.024485767,0.0001201145,0.0023301926,0.8893806,0.019540152,0.017216984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004087334,0.000056427874,0.37729806,0.000074314536,0.000075930075,0.0000037957834,0.0098577095,0.000041178355,0.00004546332,0.0022245378,0.6097415,0.00017235837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86758876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9876259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88715607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030492936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072637683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8400734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157619134","doi":"","title":"Married Couple, Single Recipient: Understanding the Exclusion of Gifts and Inheritances from Default Matrimonial Regimes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Economics","score_opus":0.0841584033312976,"score_gpt":0.29756465331942483,"score_spread":0.21340624998812724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157619134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93358016,0.0013880008,0.00056563196,0.0043540807,0.00047269007,0.000117504096,0.000046975587,0.000004903802,0.059470024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99868506,0.00008524652,0.00032197233,0.0003512163,0.00043693196,6.4517644e-7,7.632433e-7,0.000006143395,0.00011203596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992505,0.000067520785,0.00023015535,0.00008427441,0.00018009913,0.00018747665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911994,0.0001287014,0.00022411639,0.0001039261,0.0001505611,0.00027274247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004259832,0.000060819326,0.0001255125,0.000045793004,0.0009118229,0.00011111988,0.0002572669,0.000060208902,0.0000494451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007329496,0.00004581475,0.00004267492,0.00018080759,0.0010352195,0.0001721648,0.000017020875,0.00010503842,0.0000023252198],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000711387,0.000024457955,0.0047121835,0.000008037068,0.00006629091,0.000021126376,0.03257896,0.00001117539,0.005398427,0.9463788,0.008012443,0.002716911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077759573,0.00031575921,0.0149317,0.0002799321,0.0000873228,0.000009608927,0.054712906,0.000064877066,0.0006591631,0.13823009,0.7896542,0.000276885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12500362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.50119275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80814874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020019081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057175773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8808231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163571463","doi":"","title":"Hong Kong's Children Proceedings (Parental Responsibility) Bill : Comparative Family Law Reform and Multidisciplinary Collaboration","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multidisciplinary approach; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.02786398686844673,"score_gpt":0.29906628127550855,"score_spread":0.27120229440706184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163571463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8732107,0.00038629037,0.0000013229126,0.0012323838,0.0004740118,0.0003550124,0.000043538377,0.000012270085,0.124284424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998726,0.000049073144,0.00013050041,0.0003337768,0.0002651716,0.0000021856663,0.0000062675203,0.000011312864,0.00047568974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986152,0.00008214219,0.00040131254,0.00021535212,0.0003402799,0.00034568392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983889,0.000045621535,0.00027533123,0.000099008685,0.00056240754,0.00062873104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008208148,0.0001466178,0.0002933058,0.00019516051,0.0007851854,0.00028747652,0.00021098883,0.00013398993,0.000029828692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025419762,0.00012119094,0.000073652016,0.00039917108,0.00056113664,0.0010320499,0.000021862843,0.00025444402,0.000012867582],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054887397,0.0001138362,0.32736492,0.000035634526,0.0002038659,0.00005775759,0.12578304,0.000028822098,0.00743349,0.53472984,0.0023321107,0.0013678295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013265708,0.00065617956,0.8093874,0.00018981576,0.000055439756,0.00003107381,0.057839263,0.000046894478,0.00024286252,0.0017617238,0.12807946,0.0003833167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.142426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39139712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5329681,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007290708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012526419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86328465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174196727","doi":"","title":"Case Comment: McCain v McCain and Barton v Sauvé : A New Approach to Autonomous Domestic Contractual Bargaining in Ontario","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Public administration; Political science","score_opus":0.04931912024446239,"score_gpt":0.2837559971035994,"score_spread":0.234436876859137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3174196727","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8150367,0.00013288383,0.00026190295,0.004201518,0.00015519974,0.00038422886,0.000012674279,0.000005802172,0.17980905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99321,0.0000031984928,0.0011695774,0.004283686,0.000098602926,0.0000034410102,0.0000016328961,0.000009536102,0.0012203044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988904,0.000092492475,0.00032092034,0.00015628248,0.00014482526,0.00039506314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998319,0.00015583963,0.00010605432,0.00012927168,0.000060626586,0.0012292279],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084819895,0.00010239791,0.00023085227,0.00014821201,0.00029652438,0.00019024668,0.00021779964,0.00008181696,0.000114403236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008557026,0.00010334636,0.000045990775,0.00017578666,0.000106920284,0.00021873768,0.00001619259,0.00036274223,0.000026646967],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030443949,0.00006584609,0.01789813,0.000009861412,0.000047164405,0.0016900487,0.09875472,0.0011651076,0.00009458438,0.8688517,0.005852907,0.005539461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011620229,0.000108214954,0.014634946,0.000067263565,0.000025314379,0.0005442396,0.01148147,0.00012416302,0.0000026325217,0.0027324911,0.9688569,0.0002603479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9166377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9801462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.963004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008125906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039472524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7002256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3177306436","doi":"","title":"Revisiting The Handmaid’s Tale : Feminist Theory Meets Empirical Research on Surrogate Mothers","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Gender studies; Empirical research; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14803293747636473,"score_gpt":0.4212688640803418,"score_spread":0.2732359266039771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3177306436","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8737437,0.001090783,0.0000038074897,0.04304806,0.0004977943,0.0002320657,0.000006948869,0.000014627959,0.08136221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947983,0.000039516526,0.00019638664,0.0036477596,0.00086064724,0.000004156812,6.9262273e-7,0.00002064905,0.00043188903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984121,0.00020385331,0.00033101154,0.0001856938,0.0003564343,0.0005109148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99788636,0.00048507165,0.00013187388,0.00048584896,0.00039525444,0.0006155853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041421885,0.000107420085,0.0002454034,0.0002690547,0.00052375754,0.00005952627,0.00031069078,0.00013773346,0.00007091683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020822182,0.00006518705,0.00010088482,0.0003039851,0.0010845823,0.000052009982,0.000016135205,0.0017819674,0.000035504385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015654911,0.00009946448,0.07062056,0.00026696117,0.0003051041,0.004247323,0.0037078303,0.0000117027585,0.017524308,0.6821085,0.060413457,0.15912928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013596163,0.00076726876,0.05905307,0.000400826,0.000040583185,0.0010026996,0.0053511723,0.0000056079734,0.003276832,0.012322798,0.9162687,0.0001508241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014020244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025294647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8558552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013254218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015150764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7741861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184642675","doi":"","title":"Access to Assisted Conception: A Call for Legislative Reform in Light of the Modern Family ( Susan Doe v. Attorney General of Canada )","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Law; Telecommunications; Engineering","score_opus":0.05561309867744824,"score_gpt":0.31758578091382206,"score_spread":0.2619726822363738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184642675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9066088,0.0001902567,0.000013149526,0.009267187,0.0013091214,0.00045662525,0.00013269724,0.0000022862234,0.082019836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969134,0.000008794682,0.0002840232,0.0010080343,0.0003180004,0.000009220746,0.0000010104338,0.000008937351,0.0014485824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984145,0.00010640308,0.00051595137,0.00012631546,0.00042258776,0.00041421037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99808204,0.00008586023,0.0003996077,0.00013717265,0.00081695314,0.0004783715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005150644,0.00012814977,0.00036915712,0.000064206266,0.000436239,0.000052868396,0.0006715943,0.000112835274,0.000017631977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024915484,0.000086548775,0.0001380286,0.00031206198,0.00046045048,0.0002779598,0.000033216606,0.00028597514,1.8617554e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000423464,0.00016912354,0.13019231,0.00020278938,0.0008824846,0.000147033,0.24587664,0.0013755736,0.08773087,0.33043393,0.1911621,0.011403668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095271855,0.00010285201,0.4436089,0.00016712818,0.000043490647,0.0000029013931,0.009244077,0.000032334516,0.0010361434,0.00076635904,0.5437589,0.00028416974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98304355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99960774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35259682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013557612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041299607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7326373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186683474","doi":"","title":"The Best Interests of Children: An Evidence-Based Approach by Paul Millar","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.05859298943512477,"score_gpt":0.3366294320028895,"score_spread":0.2780364425677647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186683474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9731564,0.016402373,0.0000536088,0.006497433,0.0007931151,0.00020959531,0.000055582947,0.000003995991,0.002827912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952085,0.00037795777,0.0007726209,0.0028647564,0.0006719671,0.0000014488427,0.000010358412,0.00002062478,0.00007178939],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985824,0.00011273584,0.000513424,0.00013051977,0.000341445,0.00031943445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973218,0.00023259026,0.00025326633,0.0003956104,0.00062442344,0.0011723476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012302852,0.0001258042,0.00028866992,0.00011030871,0.0002096825,0.00005224397,0.00038709317,0.00021901053,0.000019021998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005574244,0.000084481486,0.00011840437,0.00016906511,0.00045580193,0.00012760614,0.000007912614,0.0013544741,0.0000030845877],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001114443,0.0009523259,0.6319606,0.00153696,0.0009052252,0.001751647,0.008292401,0.00011805511,0.021837194,0.07112123,0.1575785,0.10283144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006590839,0.011102285,0.1123776,0.0035070824,0.0010465074,0.0024097015,0.006313052,0.00063442945,0.006899217,0.0021008179,0.8456514,0.0013670793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032303724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04604024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68807286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006866467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026994273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9741402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186949450","doi":"","title":"An Alternative Conception: the Legality of Home Insemination Under Canada’s Assisted Reproduction Act","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Reproduction; Insemination; Donor insemination; Intrauterine insemination; Political science; Artificial insemination; Law; Biology; Pregnancy; Infertility; Genetics","score_opus":0.04675249353029011,"score_gpt":0.31464771367233957,"score_spread":0.2678952201420495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186949450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9816923,0.00031947513,0.000052618805,0.013092756,0.0014370234,0.00017053158,0.000015114407,0.000007804418,0.0032123872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983389,0.000019279996,0.00022296507,0.00075431116,0.00053697964,0.0000019302656,0.0000061962364,0.000008439726,0.00011100311],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989656,0.00006807053,0.00036420132,0.00016710257,0.00025575125,0.00017925113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980075,0.00003494088,0.00036811765,0.00045705677,0.00083741447,0.00029497413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069119275,0.000087058776,0.00021806077,0.00011939148,0.00015122078,0.000016862474,0.00016858522,0.00008431976,0.000029025969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038176888,0.000060818216,0.000047421934,0.00018430385,0.00042791356,0.00019706538,0.0000044456315,0.00055318116,5.5540056e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008777342,0.0003659579,0.16232467,0.0003374896,0.00070575293,0.00067070656,0.003171834,0.00030094155,0.29983363,0.26458558,0.039411582,0.22741412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056136126,0.00038775898,0.922471,0.000053328586,0.000053517546,0.00046857697,0.0015308303,0.000010799856,0.014255506,0.0020664793,0.058048554,0.00009230514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7376173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92455643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7601463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003206733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004858709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8619141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217801924","doi":"","title":"The Children Parliament Left Behind: Examining The Inequity Of Funding In An Act Respecting First Nations, Inuit And Métis Children, Youth And Families","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Economic growth; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.043405208619166136,"score_gpt":0.2902101541365199,"score_spread":0.24680494551735377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3217801924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9891797,0.0019350813,0.000006029274,0.0009995911,0.00011922298,0.00007714409,0.00007325754,0.0000021963708,0.007607833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99891526,0.00051690056,0.00007601951,0.00028196038,0.00016555925,4.94828e-7,0.0000024408191,0.000004661579,0.00003670084],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890006,0.00021954533,0.0002835814,0.00009738942,0.00021048126,0.00028896268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988195,0.0005053292,0.00018593772,0.00009317959,0.00013313931,0.000262952],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010970784,0.00007559755,0.00014449595,0.00009000087,0.001821502,0.00019428822,0.00019015478,0.00004227328,0.0000079227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005205804,0.00005591349,0.000027265272,0.00012116731,0.0011802785,0.00021420217,0.00002828135,0.00021340545,1.2766957e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034579787,0.0000059781496,0.66729385,0.000002537282,0.00003346046,0.000010947315,0.03502098,0.000034808774,0.0000103015445,0.29576853,0.000022971013,0.0017921557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020437561,0.00005523143,0.930707,0.00012497805,0.00003298457,0.000051106163,0.0627251,0.000002396075,0.000014165989,0.00050816877,0.005470942,0.00010358523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15494199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9196863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76474434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018941934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031508305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6997461026","doi":"","title":"Worthless? Victims of Family Violence and the (Non)Payment of Child Support","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Child support; Face (sociological concept); Payment; Adversarial system; Power (physics); Child abuse; Order (exchange); Family support","score_opus":0.0143361357681371,"score_gpt":0.2848715516811477,"score_spread":0.2705354159130106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6997461026","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35232577,0.0063342857,0.0002769458,0.0013839576,0.0012563535,0.00038769716,0.000050617295,0.000006148777,0.63797826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954709,0.0016095027,0.000095084215,0.002578612,0.00007449486,0.0000029536598,6.6389043e-7,0.0000065118215,0.00016127084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984237,0.00015755404,0.0006033778,0.00013100839,0.00033127298,0.00035306904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986673,0.000117652526,0.00034536267,0.00020169481,0.0003653995,0.00030257343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014348689,0.00012558817,0.00039998558,0.00018450126,0.0004165703,0.000050627874,0.0005612819,0.00009290881,0.000034320776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007944657,0.00009377214,0.00014572167,0.0003671557,0.0019018627,0.00016339346,0.000028253133,0.0002509573,0.0000028447669],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020036711,0.000072461335,0.025695395,0.00014248281,0.00027949104,0.000088219,0.013425522,0.00017231551,0.00058594806,0.92768663,0.0093584545,0.02229274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0062769577,0.0005684028,0.68069726,0.007411779,0.00056271144,0.000041500993,0.05526831,0.00014938602,0.0019482295,0.03035741,0.21589753,0.0008205013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05113342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013923358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8973292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008972836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001795641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9551852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7056622171","doi":"","title":"Family Violence and Child Support: Abuse, Shared Parenting, and Special Expenses","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Magnetic confinement fusion research","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantage; Child support; Domestic violence; Economic Justice; Family support; Inequality; Relation (database); Child protection; Diversity (politics)","score_opus":0.013012712892900692,"score_gpt":0.24587414153669884,"score_spread":0.23286142864379816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7056622171","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7116761,0.00094340235,0.000038205093,0.0006109129,0.0003059767,0.00013300788,0.000057899928,0.0000022637946,0.2862322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975093,0.000099057965,0.00008497054,0.0006388986,0.0004273764,0.000003231439,0.0000046540436,0.000006418173,0.0012260916],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911326,0.00003162581,0.00028896978,0.00014276625,0.00014083217,0.00028256341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992048,0.000036907437,0.00009799351,0.00011727339,0.0001262667,0.00041671586],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015214077,0.00011329009,0.00018809624,0.00018086014,0.00021681847,0.00018961969,0.00017722292,0.000029122628,0.008756723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010013534,0.00010867671,0.0000471162,0.00011306166,0.00016714857,0.00004926249,0.000030222523,0.00020971628,0.0000049055902],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004747868,0.000059665555,0.20300041,0.00008298443,0.00018286794,0.00021668123,0.0011474218,0.0000033232718,0.0011533161,0.06808373,0.15854439,0.5674777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012843867,0.00014239519,0.31645685,0.00077424414,0.000043307027,0.000010208959,0.0025711309,0.00002682421,0.00017273384,0.0014114293,0.6768841,0.00022240542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01402235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014019894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5672553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001049932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053648325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99254334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7066197535","doi":"","title":"The \"Family\"—and \"Families\" in Law: A Review of Archana Parashar and Franscesca Dominello, <i>The Family In Law</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Optical Polarization and Ellipsometry","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"MEDLINE; Research methodology; Family health","score_opus":0.013403620788271129,"score_gpt":0.2195263242788712,"score_spread":0.20612270349060008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7066197535","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49263346,0.4213214,0.00043963725,0.0019302218,0.00123399,0.00071652926,0.00011294078,0.00002835451,0.08158346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9684736,0.02651678,0.00019208125,0.0045640585,0.00015028755,0.0000055006085,0.0000026102807,0.00003860211,0.000056452798],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998091,0.00012638804,0.0008359931,0.0001695285,0.00026306123,0.0005140173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865687,0.00026709738,0.00012343285,0.00029855635,0.00015552224,0.0004985204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010149096,0.00023925929,0.0005024213,0.00023335472,0.0001913886,0.00008121447,0.0003960307,0.00013811262,0.00001511198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000115791365,0.00017388993,0.00009640992,0.000576075,0.0013254877,0.0002059539,0.000024300054,0.00046733196,0.000013981087],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011925786,0.00007930512,0.0026833036,0.0031161732,0.00034925115,0.00032236567,0.0030007656,0.00064495206,0.03630276,0.9129694,0.027036658,0.013375811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019308671,0.00028055857,0.029101107,0.005145994,0.00010535931,0.00007845921,0.000461946,0.0018716791,0.00033449387,0.0039182464,0.9561837,0.00058763404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004111021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09955992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.929147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000110782574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018880452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9168708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}