{"meta":{"query_hash":"8a71e7925071","filters":{"venue":"Canadian journal of family law"},"cohort_total":28,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":28,"exported":28,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/8a71e7925071","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Canadian+journal+of+family+law"},"results":[{"id":"W2783109536","doi":"","title":"Le Droit Myope","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Migration, Identity, and Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.030615827755737946,"score_gpt":0.29593595805974415,"score_spread":0.2653201303040062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783109536","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005043173,0.037081234,0.0024120274,0.08297505,0.051785544,0.00009171264,0.0016136082,0.0009903024,0.81800735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020852974,0.0060633183,0.0004799985,0.0063555636,0.004642738,0.00006207035,0.00025865558,0.0003005973,0.9609841],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986571,0.0002556135,0.000052293028,0.00029471787,0.0005415829,0.00019874949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906486,0.00031342625,0.00006208725,0.000088837136,0.0002887974,0.00018202276],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010185082,0.0012619825,0.0010395433,0.0013343177,0.0043860646,0.0058063157,0.0010180013,0.0034267125,0.32204074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038513879,0.00035850928,0.0005435544,0.00079730334,0.0015236948,0.00271583,0.0019876636,0.005757423,0.14416505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013963073,0.000046423684,0.00048941735,0.0001859925,0.000016346708,0.00060957845,0.00053153525,0.0003145391,0.0009478315,0.08962114,0.7881017,0.11899593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061941023,0.0000037644015,0.00020896636,0.000037065012,8.8663444e-7,0.00011837615,0.000092094604,0.000039120987,0.00008306006,0.00094283064,0.99846196,0.00000565755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029445505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026113017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32204074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036693348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026747263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9670266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902752104","doi":"","title":"Moral Evils v. Health and Safety Evils: The Case of an Ovum ‘Obtained’ From a ‘Donor’ and Used By the ‘Donor’ in Her Own Surrogate Pregnancy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Egg donation; Pregnancy; Gynecology; Andrology; Medicine; Obstetrics; Biology; Genetics","score_opus":0.04741376017114965,"score_gpt":0.3062397410306981,"score_spread":0.25882598085954844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902752104","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038565073,0.0032410738,0.0058151884,0.18059035,0.0014338244,0.00010086647,0.00009527658,0.000045644938,0.7701127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7514851,0.0018162419,0.0015909338,0.15462688,0.00096705934,0.00015944404,0.000037205213,0.000057527428,0.08925958],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98371464,0.006452252,0.0003449027,0.0013479762,0.0046377177,0.0035025582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99061006,0.006427964,0.00037587856,0.00057618745,0.0014429147,0.0005669119],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012483901,0.00028997252,0.0004940604,0.00059995713,0.015969595,0.007962631,0.0017436376,0.015393328,0.0023566969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019455673,0.0005063395,0.00080873683,0.00052088255,0.034183323,0.0030990206,0.0038887686,0.014566423,0.00041398962],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012337254,0.000007656023,0.00027332074,0.000013917764,0.0000031996112,0.0004601271,0.0038011696,0.00014635747,0.00008949598,0.9785805,0.014410548,0.0022013765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008598232,0.00008396988,0.0022039283,0.000595282,0.000064484804,0.0010417547,0.008689233,0.0012936416,0.0013685102,0.30946442,0.67497706,0.00013173468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26519766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2585974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73480237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014611041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026232528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5273081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004913135","doi":"","title":"(Some) Mothers Know Best: A Case Comment on MM v TB and the Plight of Indigenous Mothers in Child Welfare and Adoption Proceedings","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Welfare; Economic growth; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.02118420762285752,"score_gpt":0.28836404222592305,"score_spread":0.26717983460306555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004913135","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05523123,0.0013493205,0.0006696197,0.91061044,0.003397569,0.00004860684,0.000026705005,0.000030103405,0.028636415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24150644,0.0014580268,0.00084832544,0.7241113,0.0031332271,0.00012745152,0.000011099691,0.00005883025,0.028745268],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"case_report","domain_scores_codex":[0.99263203,0.0023259895,0.0004662232,0.0008380633,0.00080228696,0.0029354875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9817423,0.013034144,0.0013709146,0.00047642508,0.001214482,0.0021617205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011822677,0.0006045457,0.0008168615,0.00065222575,0.034138046,0.0074237124,0.005577645,0.060356624,0.0068708058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034731667,0.0014541037,0.001303633,0.00091475615,0.017677233,0.007041706,0.009047856,0.076247476,0.0007928681],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000103308455,0.00009513029,0.0068582282,0.00025985469,0.00006540872,0.035403907,0.5367983,0.00018279225,0.0014705738,0.24459879,0.1647467,0.009417024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050807317,0.00010042269,0.0051488597,0.001305604,0.00017452352,0.012479471,0.5163396,0.00041806174,0.0014814863,0.023332983,0.43896285,0.00020538861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1370741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.225778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8629259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009301797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01822863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2725525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005267199","doi":"","title":"Prestation Compensatoire Et Union De Fait En Droit Québécois : Étude Critique Du Discours Judiciaire","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Healthcare Systems and Practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.05178023628263907,"score_gpt":0.4094153229177707,"score_spread":0.35763508663513166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005267199","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3107504,0.0119667845,0.009123204,0.11981535,0.0007504748,0.00012165102,0.0003263455,0.000059010217,0.54708683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91761714,0.0018898951,0.001289673,0.008184346,0.0001618434,0.00009126772,0.00004858957,0.000044482793,0.07067278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99005485,0.0026739675,0.00032306858,0.001092865,0.0024610097,0.0033942747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899164,0.005511059,0.0007526057,0.00062554365,0.002396052,0.00079837826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009307673,0.0006387919,0.0011343586,0.0017696149,0.025170755,0.010362645,0.003386597,0.011985992,0.008839526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019183673,0.00070093625,0.0008100851,0.0030094476,0.029370952,0.0039735357,0.004399946,0.014327357,0.00048269652],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020683545,0.000021885799,0.002717299,0.00003419829,0.000015931508,0.00038096288,0.027872067,0.00029347287,0.0001374373,0.9540419,0.008409046,0.00605507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018255168,0.000096558186,0.055207044,0.0016158576,0.00016205883,0.0014139095,0.10980333,0.0033452155,0.0010186635,0.20781326,0.61906725,0.00027435998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9505992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96299124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9336902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06630978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11085534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48111337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039067449","doi":"","title":"Book Review: A Parent-Partner Status for American Family Law by Merle H. Weiner","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Psychology; Genealogy; Political science; History","score_opus":0.039273711452433996,"score_gpt":0.3395010143025037,"score_spread":0.3002273028500697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3039067449","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00042559247,0.18380179,0.00032981986,0.54092443,0.23484552,0.00010941258,0.00040272542,0.00006890798,0.039091773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010788219,0.21686694,0.00059519423,0.34528068,0.21302268,0.00024762313,0.00056880614,0.00017802285,0.2124518],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976572,0.000592128,0.00018717384,0.00023825173,0.0011741032,0.00015110329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818971,0.009525544,0.00066182006,0.00033751404,0.006437816,0.001140273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029703449,0.0007495218,0.0011773428,0.0027913887,0.0022367418,0.0036257398,0.001942634,0.007980834,0.020087091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022032326,0.00046606307,0.0005307351,0.0022692257,0.0021237491,0.0031610634,0.0013489345,0.007459238,0.00972155],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028020768,0.000002622025,0.000029034869,0.000046591267,0.0000010434132,0.0000118584,0.0000070665233,0.000007965636,0.000004947259,0.00045906927,0.9946385,0.0047885156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010830667,0.000010848468,0.0006119045,0.00084731524,0.000009457953,0.00012025413,0.00007789147,0.000036383433,0.000022979833,0.001082618,0.9971578,0.000011716843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02247034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.069929786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02247034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049991957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008053701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06719804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039642515","doi":"","title":"A Feminist Critique of Quebec v. A. : Evaluating the Supreme Court's Divided Opinion on Section 15 and Common Law Support Obligations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Law; Supreme court; Political science; Common law; Majority opinion; Business","score_opus":0.08359551058275173,"score_gpt":0.3771282442904529,"score_spread":0.29353273370770117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3039642515","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057015423,0.0071127503,0.003268835,0.4586484,0.0012277863,0.000074850854,0.00072021916,0.000054529257,0.4718773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8534957,0.0017691038,0.0012985738,0.087736204,0.0005508782,0.00008867927,0.00007545458,0.00006806191,0.054917384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897572,0.00341593,0.00015096799,0.00080136757,0.0030144344,0.0028599703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849635,0.008757994,0.0004840555,0.00037581005,0.004558267,0.00086040475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011505003,0.0006580684,0.00089584646,0.0025810688,0.029139437,0.010583787,0.0049051726,0.016572671,0.009102972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021040106,0.0005606036,0.00083332043,0.0027259416,0.031715367,0.0043182946,0.0031005368,0.0138718,0.00059029367],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035812584,0.000011003686,0.0009426171,0.00004325131,0.000015769028,0.00034226698,0.014299006,0.00034047558,0.00014464742,0.9023742,0.07674757,0.0047032842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017068042,0.000058247017,0.016481368,0.0016918228,0.00020490441,0.0003412241,0.053715944,0.002824063,0.0014505739,0.306506,0.6162459,0.0003091438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9671414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98281604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09814912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09814912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08953458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71212506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044244435","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Autonomous Motherhood? A Socio-Legal Study of Choice and Constraint by Susan B. Boyd, Dorothy E. Chunn, Fiona Kelly, and Wanda Wiegers","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constraint (computer-aided design); Sociology; Gender studies; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.021684932551733455,"score_gpt":0.2985832967222767,"score_spread":0.27689836417054325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3044244435","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037464395,0.62101066,0.00010162523,0.3325565,0.035938714,0.000016684331,0.00013231153,0.000008199602,0.009860645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010316113,0.8007781,0.00014692801,0.11156617,0.049750537,0.00006607845,0.00018640497,0.000048087724,0.027141565],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975095,0.000977804,0.00014192385,0.00018935901,0.0010234902,0.0001579184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9733732,0.018978266,0.00087846234,0.00029649882,0.005488183,0.0009853189],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028504138,0.000440034,0.0012411074,0.0018277758,0.0014848631,0.0036724305,0.0018446046,0.004662303,0.010303665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024983002,0.0004448907,0.00038259287,0.0029022885,0.0028911186,0.0031335144,0.00089119974,0.006627748,0.003545681],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010457494,0.000003618683,0.000082238876,0.00030393162,0.000007900523,0.000035740435,0.00006621067,0.000019112531,0.000008592638,0.0026797352,0.9856477,0.011134786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019464429,0.000014586223,0.0006392311,0.002588186,0.000023505896,0.0003230543,0.00036628745,0.00003641671,0.000044828663,0.002652907,0.99327374,0.000017845712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02685691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0633006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02685691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043699997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009406682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053401172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044670361","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Petra Nordqvist and Carol Smart, Relative Strangers: Family Life, Genes and Donor Conception","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"History of Science and Medicine","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology","score_opus":0.05997318476299163,"score_gpt":0.24171930320122142,"score_spread":0.1817461184382298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3044670361","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000080949896,0.61039263,0.00012152529,0.26981953,0.10904691,0.000022163062,0.00013905094,0.000026390566,0.010350827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002285164,0.5578776,0.00024172515,0.22939512,0.13077834,0.00010676282,0.00024527023,0.00006695462,0.07900309],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987638,0.0002958643,0.000086395565,0.00017103468,0.0006003553,0.0000825844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992494,0.0049061514,0.00028194865,0.00012149809,0.0017133495,0.0004831121],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019314518,0.0010311415,0.0018530241,0.0026470504,0.0018796024,0.0039061643,0.0026489468,0.0110704275,0.020911675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014121399,0.0007301394,0.0006317996,0.0034072401,0.0029434047,0.004602908,0.001830562,0.010883483,0.011757719],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000347409,0.0000022159277,0.000011708885,0.00012882016,0.0000027792692,0.000019523082,0.000020302847,0.000009504415,0.0000048357965,0.0007268878,0.992927,0.006142804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013220401,0.0000046029572,0.00012728307,0.00078389305,0.000008693865,0.00017777675,0.00008660537,0.00001175552,0.000012831445,0.00096532056,0.9977996,0.000008446802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016202735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04680466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020911675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004423237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050917463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06995648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048446512","doi":"","title":"Townshend v. Townshend & Buttar v. Buttar : Gifts, Exclusions, and Intentions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics","score_opus":0.06655443817021048,"score_gpt":0.33343272735938606,"score_spread":0.26687828918917555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048446512","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21515325,0.011413052,0.0024213712,0.29263222,0.0006122987,0.00009390214,0.00032511496,0.00003855986,0.47731018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96555114,0.0019323501,0.00026805338,0.012694979,0.0001350124,0.000030398289,0.000026677633,0.0000095524565,0.019351773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970701,0.0008648763,0.00013805596,0.00022012206,0.00089913013,0.0008076178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915176,0.005218013,0.0006012363,0.00033895925,0.0011986023,0.0011254223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043211025,0.00021695717,0.00042761822,0.0015734567,0.010048237,0.0053998376,0.001230547,0.0073550744,0.006420764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018783938,0.00031878633,0.00039613197,0.0013313035,0.014265148,0.004152174,0.004023273,0.0060978252,0.00031641457],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057309662,0.00005361702,0.0083821835,0.00003510661,0.000012733373,0.0004300554,0.00986357,0.0001474698,0.0001251122,0.93216026,0.04101803,0.0077145025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020422139,0.000119580094,0.08445156,0.001367259,0.0002474385,0.0011274058,0.06719703,0.0013173283,0.001785345,0.57594895,0.2659625,0.00027135998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2613774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39238432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7386226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007917952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013403381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51971203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048599398","doi":"","title":"Consent, Coercion, and Shared Parenting: Ruffudeen-Coutts v Coutts","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); Psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05136468322551728,"score_gpt":0.3043930437155806,"score_spread":0.25302836049006333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048599398","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13615802,0.028768325,0.0049461885,0.6544876,0.004522012,0.00028979612,0.00014326983,0.00004784772,0.17063695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78790325,0.00673723,0.0014790263,0.18109903,0.001791602,0.00035264232,0.00004156288,0.000040839208,0.020554842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98794043,0.005560462,0.00065817375,0.0015938847,0.0017502594,0.0024968013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849664,0.0121663585,0.00049555965,0.0006799839,0.00082380127,0.0008679072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02386649,0.0005776244,0.0012196806,0.0010116474,0.015082414,0.006252439,0.0033288035,0.041465115,0.0029251794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041195434,0.00085598545,0.0009545853,0.0012377393,0.027202291,0.009864465,0.007037419,0.032860186,0.00021994414],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008547875,0.0000652456,0.0020158803,0.0000979785,0.00003064662,0.0020583824,0.042305246,0.00015628785,0.00017877934,0.90720296,0.030759118,0.015044111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000333019,0.00013448534,0.0053829183,0.0030339404,0.00028088142,0.0029334812,0.062976286,0.0009770091,0.0011450424,0.59007853,0.33244067,0.0002837486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10883559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18924941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10883559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006569133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028164411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21640414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048850375","doi":"","title":"Book Review: D’un océan à l’autre . . . recension de Nicole Laviolette et Julie Audet, L’essentiel du droit de la famille dans les provinces et territoires de common law au Canada","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016499674226058882,"score_gpt":0.280056274338826,"score_spread":0.26355660011276716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048850375","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000102560065,0.24808411,0.00023139681,0.5467034,0.196843,0.000033210057,0.00029242373,0.00004710495,0.007662825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022682429,0.23689583,0.00065428735,0.5143182,0.17860812,0.00014653447,0.00043525427,0.00016197056,0.06651156],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938917,0.0015490905,0.00057520514,0.0005707477,0.003064163,0.00034906296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9366987,0.021182058,0.0026453964,0.0015211346,0.03399945,0.003953284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006376966,0.0010155452,0.0024846618,0.0048749805,0.0030530249,0.009622899,0.002718753,0.008075108,0.022879565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04910179,0.00083051575,0.0010535783,0.005175498,0.0037609963,0.010201897,0.0025712019,0.0109224,0.013567955],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033958984,0.000002247105,0.000023807845,0.00015653367,0.0000030758044,0.000011007927,0.000026737547,0.00000615204,0.000008980631,0.00039481517,0.99487585,0.0044874516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005123305,0.000002574136,0.0000950349,0.0008147793,0.0000071257277,0.000064694425,0.00007284988,0.0000073840633,0.000011328986,0.00037347953,0.9985367,0.000008996458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055228725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16439731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9447713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010313395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022733228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.109814465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3059442353","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Families and the Law: Cases and Commentary by Mary Jane Mossman","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Genealogy; History; Political science","score_opus":0.020164165656455603,"score_gpt":0.26153677700058947,"score_spread":0.24137261134413387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3059442353","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019429548,0.0906052,0.000057215944,0.8342898,0.06920039,0.000025713704,0.00006281653,0.000009446111,0.0055551087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004214824,0.08525759,0.00017253812,0.78366876,0.09811278,0.0001481324,0.000066657296,0.000059074016,0.028299702],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99505866,0.0015726434,0.0003610328,0.00048172864,0.0020757103,0.00045015177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95498747,0.03430904,0.0015447281,0.0003894576,0.007085627,0.0016837296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006260847,0.00095298723,0.0020632206,0.0038228235,0.007045571,0.006404804,0.0040496946,0.035102352,0.00848209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04576274,0.0010382675,0.0011247869,0.003626877,0.0052890927,0.0054852595,0.0030195394,0.024509648,0.0030433438],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029350872,0.0000019758988,0.00001704073,0.000097218246,0.0000027522888,0.00004744668,0.00009713947,0.000008708685,0.0000075173707,0.00089445524,0.9972363,0.0015865585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013170719,0.000007054109,0.000322289,0.0022416105,0.000027546957,0.00023578448,0.0008020304,0.000031128107,0.000035321915,0.0017923678,0.99447083,0.000020916108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0736942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19389667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0736942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011222258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018861707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14653051},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3080503576","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Transforming Law’s Family: The Legal Recognition of Planned Lesbian Motherhood by Fiona Kelly","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lesbian; Gender studies; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.08938747715330296,"score_gpt":0.29253082046172363,"score_spread":0.20314334330842065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3080503576","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017459854,0.6406739,0.00016493618,0.21821214,0.12376679,0.000036086356,0.000109931134,0.000027602062,0.01683414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0034696984,0.6314018,0.0002509037,0.17228329,0.10956178,0.00011776207,0.00014663178,0.00009899137,0.08266918],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845445,0.0005174538,0.00010401091,0.00015994253,0.0006198184,0.00014436712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99003285,0.006752937,0.00032009216,0.00014508748,0.0021993436,0.00054973335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023507164,0.0009176212,0.0016159373,0.0033825228,0.0024631242,0.004215518,0.0019247953,0.008344017,0.015260556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010139539,0.00064296025,0.0004762886,0.0038275388,0.0035983848,0.004226732,0.0015974978,0.008348883,0.0052558687],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031367156,0.0000033050226,0.000016216465,0.0001717579,0.0000016581052,0.000013382317,0.000046096426,0.000012247451,0.000008380808,0.00086335116,0.9911951,0.0076653305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064618625,0.0000064034175,0.0002047036,0.0013410919,0.000006363373,0.000098703415,0.00019095783,0.000014974372,0.00001761569,0.0007451761,0.99735767,0.000009795823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054904684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.164988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054904684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00595969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008779627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10917026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3080640902","doi":"","title":"Share the Wealth? Kerr v Baranow and the \"Joint Family Venture\"","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Joint venture; Business; Joint (building); Business administration; Engineering; Structural engineering","score_opus":0.0658104394636366,"score_gpt":0.26196873119723174,"score_spread":0.19615829173359514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3080640902","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12174105,0.004074922,0.0013315316,0.6433665,0.0018239261,0.00006100398,0.00012574969,0.000026252852,0.22744909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7932053,0.0011851313,0.00026731603,0.15510526,0.0010257522,0.00007290837,0.000030562358,0.000028936933,0.04907883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956742,0.0013666939,0.000108638866,0.00041232994,0.0005661665,0.0018719888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99481344,0.0025173626,0.00037616794,0.0003684193,0.00037308663,0.0015515106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065754745,0.00029476485,0.00070243445,0.0005243749,0.014594821,0.007472067,0.0019448875,0.027769541,0.008779316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021328222,0.0005563083,0.0005801937,0.00064688944,0.012318747,0.008546342,0.0071454607,0.01684853,0.0006008381],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010116467,0.00013062087,0.0045182304,0.000026187454,0.000033280365,0.0014992806,0.008791175,0.0001739282,0.00022551899,0.85599333,0.11561236,0.012894886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028722745,0.0001419313,0.00983596,0.00071243744,0.0001539278,0.0022368412,0.039051842,0.0010352192,0.0009483991,0.5005137,0.4448417,0.0002407759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.085341774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17422387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.085341774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050146007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018111557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16969007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081446521","doi":"","title":"Introducing the Next Class of Bastard: An Assessment of the Definitional Implications of the Succession Law Reform Act for After-Born Children","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Child Welfare and Adoption","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ecological succession; Law; Class (philosophy); Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04932346918375177,"score_gpt":0.31003386914698433,"score_spread":0.26071039996323253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081446521","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24130298,0.00433735,0.011192934,0.09342671,0.00175629,0.00026545805,0.00017164483,0.000074807795,0.64747185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9403257,0.00087795,0.0065219323,0.017782385,0.00021910603,0.00019189152,0.00006177871,0.0000579046,0.033961307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866737,0.0057225255,0.0005250571,0.0009944277,0.0026632336,0.0034209627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99089277,0.004329682,0.00089641806,0.0007631665,0.0018158674,0.0013020324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015045109,0.000366308,0.00071980804,0.0016033213,0.01629069,0.011374673,0.0033844488,0.0083429115,0.008525366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021976806,0.0005313354,0.0008485747,0.0015654542,0.022415638,0.0083865505,0.0077899806,0.0142389005,0.00052854465],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002362102,0.000028076563,0.0011843954,0.000025101463,0.0000016658427,0.000066604705,0.0060024527,0.000048596594,0.0000782954,0.9838378,0.0035774785,0.0051260414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020336446,0.0005444986,0.02441557,0.0017825904,0.00010329492,0.00061953074,0.10261292,0.0026991256,0.0026324145,0.3801925,0.48400208,0.00019207045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06512701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16947597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.934873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010290321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027862681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12949586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118739551","doi":"","title":"The \"Family\"—and \"Families\" in Law: A Review of Archana Parashar and Franscesca Dominello, The Family In Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.0634057558751246,"score_gpt":0.3427713802528224,"score_spread":0.2793656243776978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3118739551","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000030780044,0.9984079,0.000017176482,0.001222523,0.00015429466,0.0000012835565,0.0000050097565,4.29167e-7,0.00016067241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008489285,0.9975217,0.000067656016,0.0011992449,0.0002601033,0.000004661916,0.000007016455,0.0000010181499,0.000089677036],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784243,0.0008823239,0.00030859033,0.0002370681,0.0006136088,0.00011606742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885748,0.009260797,0.000527486,0.00011439942,0.0012230036,0.0002994615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050839987,0.0010124139,0.002192541,0.009139156,0.0015782282,0.004578876,0.0012408934,0.004678493,0.0035028209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010985922,0.0006488622,0.00075548014,0.013863447,0.0047974656,0.0067637097,0.0028651063,0.0040157824,0.00045360063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000090740745,0.00010198063,0.0012827213,0.07814125,0.0003213224,0.0002661732,0.003879527,0.00025903492,0.0001834533,0.06201448,0.13934019,0.7141191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023010596,0.000035126075,0.0031583107,0.10349325,0.00028677064,0.00059763406,0.002738327,0.000053480526,0.00005741006,0.009672517,0.8798433,0.000040812138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03196209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.092083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03196209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005224508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01869737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06355214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124959456","doi":"","title":"A v B and Attorney General of Quebec (Eric v Lola) —The Implications for Cohabiting Couples Outside Quebec","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Supreme court; Legislature; Law; Order (exchange); Sociology; Poverty; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.05099248566382994,"score_gpt":0.30064280178728814,"score_spread":0.2496503161234582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124959456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2844845,0.010158387,0.001270653,0.24727434,0.0014990268,0.00013038851,0.0005185091,0.00004261749,0.45462155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86901295,0.0018981971,0.00037927082,0.067224994,0.00019027454,0.00004344689,0.00008222737,0.00001617412,0.06115246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99573046,0.00064706,0.0000705168,0.0003587175,0.00078961323,0.0024036781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99530387,0.0013692306,0.00027102366,0.00016275064,0.0014754678,0.0014175957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034982087,0.00022992854,0.00027276325,0.000636469,0.024768298,0.006101774,0.0018347751,0.0069445185,0.00791475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063842232,0.000332499,0.00047395707,0.000809413,0.0071783126,0.0015655935,0.0021626358,0.005777762,0.0003674452],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001416676,0.00014419608,0.07787361,0.00012862952,0.0000607272,0.004945918,0.021158896,0.00072716305,0.0012142822,0.6165071,0.2201343,0.05696351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013935803,0.00019501311,0.18247637,0.0010367674,0.00018871008,0.002113878,0.08534758,0.001621074,0.0016973092,0.029820738,0.69503725,0.00032590324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9870083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9943553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041745737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041745737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08077352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30288792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157619134","doi":"","title":"Married Couple, Single Recipient: Understanding the Exclusion of Gifts and Inheritances from Default Matrimonial Regimes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Economics","score_opus":0.0841584033312976,"score_gpt":0.29756465331942483,"score_spread":0.21340624998812724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157619134","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40054476,0.0037303262,0.02259284,0.017407725,0.00010030892,0.000072446725,0.000160725,0.000038463433,0.5553524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99023247,0.00074227137,0.0010147,0.0005951525,0.000026978507,0.00002128342,0.000032746266,0.000013915132,0.007320494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799746,0.000764602,0.00006282415,0.00019657664,0.00040840285,0.00057004933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844414,0.0005358199,0.000204189,0.00013576933,0.00039438604,0.00028563195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003800201,0.00022965006,0.00051942543,0.0016125913,0.01492528,0.0077780965,0.0019154031,0.0021795668,0.0041742465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047494015,0.0002652844,0.00032980953,0.001573396,0.024494017,0.006554859,0.0035195218,0.0027928133,0.00023943014],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009767817,0.000012500414,0.0027388106,0.000014671916,0.0000028082875,0.0002793692,0.059897855,0.00011634496,0.00007586264,0.93236697,0.00071593135,0.003769167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044035238,0.00005305548,0.028266374,0.0005594509,0.000078009194,0.00079640816,0.16281295,0.0036197987,0.0003009571,0.590089,0.21331431,0.000065567525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7643347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7676545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7643347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032496694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022660153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47410637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163571463","doi":"","title":"Hong Kong's Children Proceedings (Parental Responsibility) Bill : Comparative Family Law Reform and Multidisciplinary Collaboration","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multidisciplinary approach; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.02786398686844673,"score_gpt":0.29906628127550855,"score_spread":0.27120229440706184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163571463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74675703,0.0041277963,0.00041391506,0.074243635,0.00053182634,0.00022533658,0.00030549624,0.000023559433,0.17337146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.961155,0.001060834,0.00029675078,0.0049877805,0.00005169705,0.00014817325,0.000068630856,0.000006473132,0.032224696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943879,0.0021066058,0.00020044242,0.00032783937,0.0007196818,0.0022574605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99074805,0.003121644,0.00052424305,0.00055763085,0.0013343742,0.0037140471],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008094067,0.00021977289,0.00029707092,0.0015368148,0.015792698,0.008426788,0.0017767467,0.0039080405,0.009496086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0137402015,0.00041682296,0.000388662,0.0017811201,0.004910886,0.002867797,0.0052872165,0.0031827996,0.00029406702],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036098826,0.0010127594,0.094881676,0.00027054053,0.00010702876,0.0035115944,0.12903096,0.0012980002,0.0005330547,0.56082255,0.102502316,0.105668545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024285889,0.0003708733,0.42075568,0.0009694616,0.00025778683,0.000549157,0.2690593,0.0011246315,0.001201758,0.016398475,0.28893027,0.00013977637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5144365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.688033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5144365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032475714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11437896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9768462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174196727","doi":"","title":"Case Comment: McCain v McCain and Barton v Sauvé : A New Approach to Autonomous Domestic Contractual Bargaining in Ontario","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Public administration; Political science","score_opus":0.04931912024446239,"score_gpt":0.2837559971035994,"score_spread":0.234436876859137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3174196727","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053274598,0.001234255,0.0007979939,0.8256829,0.0023052897,0.00016926808,0.0003802504,0.000060408816,0.116095066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24618182,0.0014679012,0.000777918,0.59177023,0.0017287378,0.00019742514,0.00008309479,0.00008102559,0.15771179],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995017,0.0004702496,0.00022359946,0.0006576581,0.0013727611,0.0022587422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923638,0.00330683,0.00053029304,0.0002728559,0.0014471174,0.002078969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003025908,0.00043662565,0.00066144275,0.00084207125,0.03421084,0.0062231496,0.004190044,0.04453902,0.014674792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012099257,0.0013168369,0.001094532,0.0020667522,0.011721616,0.0029692026,0.003342343,0.031462867,0.0011317072],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021635757,0.00006813904,0.008183543,0.0001626356,0.000068464076,0.008509761,0.048655894,0.0004038855,0.0009426528,0.25017545,0.67570376,0.00690939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021614309,0.000055311393,0.016224476,0.0003581921,0.00017690498,0.0026749163,0.046460412,0.0008543743,0.00078829215,0.019069947,0.9128236,0.00029737083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9720943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99014646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0726572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0726572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11226981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5271673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3177306436","doi":"","title":"Revisiting The Handmaid’s Tale : Feminist Theory Meets Empirical Research on Surrogate Mothers","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Gender studies; Empirical research; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14803293747636473,"score_gpt":0.4212688640803418,"score_spread":0.2732359266039771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3177306436","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042073574,0.010265874,0.016657012,0.78026295,0.0015769629,0.000041867224,0.000064901404,0.000015035506,0.14904173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93158984,0.005982693,0.0044161114,0.04599296,0.0007434959,0.00013818093,0.00002888229,0.00006904103,0.011038751],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9844223,0.01201896,0.0002226698,0.0009379377,0.0015090615,0.00088920415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8955912,0.09699278,0.0015045138,0.0018297386,0.0028795907,0.001202161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030286403,0.0006832093,0.0012089055,0.0026688145,0.01383519,0.010159161,0.004362575,0.011055408,0.010883703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053750426,0.0006322474,0.00045852765,0.0026528286,0.08690847,0.026412088,0.008440138,0.013366614,0.00068453397],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008685389,0.000014845089,0.00035891804,0.00004937484,0.0000029835167,0.00013884038,0.030104496,0.00007744371,0.000028835873,0.95969194,0.0046505085,0.004872997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002135757,0.000020442527,0.00068049575,0.00082144456,0.000010445344,0.0002139756,0.10504283,0.00066709385,0.00023174063,0.81304884,0.07921364,0.000027652828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035260156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054195628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035260156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011005093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012180379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16017169},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184642675","doi":"","title":"Access to Assisted Conception: A Call for Legislative Reform in Light of the Modern Family ( Susan Doe v. Attorney General of Canada )","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Law; Telecommunications; Engineering","score_opus":0.05561309867744824,"score_gpt":0.31758578091382206,"score_spread":0.2619726822363738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184642675","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012863557,0.0074934172,0.0012296541,0.93370205,0.0030179727,0.00013063094,0.00021877859,0.0001037822,0.04124022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1311107,0.0066907667,0.003484404,0.80808836,0.003340273,0.00024690852,0.00016777849,0.00009455079,0.046776168],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97842926,0.0027016827,0.0009983365,0.0015901871,0.008872325,0.007408313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96708816,0.014573273,0.0012121842,0.0013163771,0.006936175,0.008873767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021449463,0.00066191156,0.0012173854,0.001446089,0.020541511,0.011471105,0.0082573285,0.0548338,0.0057752854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038765866,0.0013525261,0.0014138529,0.0018588223,0.019690529,0.0061991857,0.007234787,0.04214444,0.00056617375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011541087,0.00015238477,0.0060179005,0.00026659993,0.000066408,0.0017937319,0.01591014,0.0007814037,0.0010472619,0.43203494,0.5076726,0.0341412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026406723,0.00013657572,0.018724155,0.0013696055,0.00016683253,0.0010229951,0.0120989345,0.0014311237,0.0007413475,0.040821884,0.92283714,0.00038526658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92398167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07601833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05144588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2733082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3732677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186683474","doi":"","title":"The Best Interests of Children: An Evidence-Based Approach by Paul Millar","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.05859298943512477,"score_gpt":0.3366294320028895,"score_spread":0.2780364425677647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186683474","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00059131155,0.05935465,0.0016361309,0.92590606,0.0040128888,0.0000316667,0.000019150857,0.0000062363697,0.008441757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1222365,0.24967657,0.02103721,0.5781006,0.016261885,0.00043247032,0.000048316433,0.000106359075,0.012100148],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9470706,0.03375499,0.004096787,0.0021140706,0.011681806,0.0012817353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7151456,0.2533693,0.004416217,0.0017371713,0.018624803,0.0067068334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05710474,0.0009615834,0.0024892893,0.004442926,0.0073880535,0.016787646,0.0037922033,0.018887369,0.0024492026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14403433,0.001218173,0.0009961857,0.002615482,0.023872823,0.013653002,0.0061462014,0.040388044,0.0004693788],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006486228,0.00011161195,0.001357244,0.0020211209,0.00017572241,0.0011479147,0.013607964,0.0007114098,0.00011217709,0.39216542,0.5016383,0.086886294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009330066,0.00006242888,0.0009929531,0.014536924,0.00015352943,0.001506309,0.012505707,0.00067949924,0.00034081322,0.26558295,0.7034106,0.00013489256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02371914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037082627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05710474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010455659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02839842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3020023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186949450","doi":"","title":"An Alternative Conception: the Legality of Home Insemination Under Canada’s Assisted Reproduction Act","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Reproduction; Insemination; Donor insemination; Intrauterine insemination; Political science; Artificial insemination; Law; Biology; Pregnancy; Infertility; Genetics","score_opus":0.04675249353029011,"score_gpt":0.31464771367233957,"score_spread":0.2678952201420495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186949450","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.106674515,0.010487694,0.005488771,0.33909318,0.0018611178,0.00016410957,0.0005405016,0.000057429497,0.5356328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8365384,0.0047714952,0.003842201,0.08453601,0.0008007079,0.00009763497,0.0001292992,0.000055142664,0.06922924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98789585,0.0023781476,0.00034931675,0.0010807978,0.00485155,0.0034443575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98814255,0.006887956,0.0004975102,0.00063572393,0.0027434516,0.001092861],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007717435,0.0003364567,0.00063795777,0.001114994,0.015946345,0.007916975,0.004250125,0.019682346,0.0062158466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02180444,0.00071327377,0.0009611639,0.0015376001,0.017661449,0.0030277444,0.0036371094,0.017515268,0.0003208701],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000860155,0.000036600435,0.0026065616,0.000034165954,0.000019600893,0.001166545,0.0068107103,0.00037884052,0.00020608403,0.94427055,0.033660784,0.010723563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003272761,0.0001358612,0.02278162,0.0013831251,0.00030728537,0.0030808186,0.022886636,0.007495685,0.0014483571,0.2727101,0.66701937,0.00042381082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9621105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97831327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058519196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.058519196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15841053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4245885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217801924","doi":"","title":"The Children Parliament Left Behind: Examining The Inequity Of Funding In An Act Respecting First Nations, Inuit And Métis Children, Youth And Families","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Economic growth; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.043405208619166136,"score_gpt":0.2902101541365199,"score_spread":0.24680494551735377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3217801924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9846586,0.00020978779,0.000047665308,0.0036209053,0.000019303354,0.0000119499555,0.000051173174,9.0841e-7,0.011379779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99800664,0.00009034889,0.000035498717,0.00041806675,0.0000072111766,0.000017645518,0.000018070656,0.000001917577,0.0014046156],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.989282,0.004367304,0.0002983173,0.0003475192,0.0014587622,0.0042459364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98302966,0.0061745257,0.0042585763,0.0002872396,0.002126573,0.004123487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056146,0.0001476252,0.0004000554,0.0018873563,0.012652237,0.006065204,0.0017321588,0.0020848727,0.0031485674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026593763,0.00029760812,0.00029759845,0.0030450255,0.0062691774,0.003391667,0.006300548,0.004855136,0.00017621575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015745022,0.00042786368,0.5556069,0.000060991973,0.00006357367,0.00093900523,0.35919765,0.00032304128,0.00018972534,0.06276502,0.0040511484,0.016217627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009438615,0.00012074515,0.28446293,0.00017237669,0.000045884357,0.00023453604,0.6997211,0.0004233298,0.00016459785,0.0026310727,0.011987454,0.000026440695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.52998054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.734606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47001946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015924532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022751564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.945575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6997461026","doi":"","title":"Worthless? Victims of Family Violence and the (Non)Payment of Child Support","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Child support; Face (sociological concept); Payment; Adversarial system; Power (physics); Child abuse; Order (exchange); Family support","score_opus":0.0143361357681371,"score_gpt":0.2848715516811477,"score_spread":0.2705354159130106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6997461026","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37136728,0.013544998,0.0025175721,0.37142822,0.0014525224,0.00006108207,0.00006472696,0.000027177011,0.23953651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9780546,0.0025582819,0.0002236164,0.013427143,0.00024627263,0.000021198235,0.000009542554,0.0000121080075,0.00544725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960394,0.0018642168,0.0001455825,0.00022454953,0.00058385584,0.0011424323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99692035,0.0014164572,0.000763952,0.00021603306,0.00024862622,0.00043462904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004487714,0.00015414863,0.00033168978,0.00059522234,0.007891059,0.005376366,0.0011451734,0.005651373,0.0049654855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01600461,0.00030871163,0.0002669794,0.0005882608,0.016560134,0.005605189,0.0048554125,0.0066853357,0.0002629975],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034999463,0.000049065053,0.012208607,0.000065864384,0.000024212413,0.0048526977,0.12048297,0.00007605971,0.00019614982,0.81553346,0.02212084,0.024355056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000625764,0.000105251966,0.019847814,0.0021523032,0.000087192726,0.0157936,0.45944634,0.00045648968,0.00064921856,0.2220306,0.27926046,0.000108196495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02863897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036801625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97136104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042508473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048017935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05694455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7056622171","doi":"","title":"Family Violence and Child Support: Abuse, Shared Parenting, and Special Expenses","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Magnetic confinement fusion research","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantage; Child support; Domestic violence; Economic Justice; Family support; Inequality; Relation (database); Child protection; Diversity (politics)","score_opus":0.013012712892900692,"score_gpt":0.24587414153669884,"score_spread":0.23286142864379816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7056622171","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36148387,0.034184627,0.004154674,0.30036676,0.0011691257,0.00013591266,0.0002162306,0.000028410283,0.29826042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97012377,0.009933061,0.0008683448,0.012234646,0.00023433652,0.000072337476,0.0000444088,0.000009949025,0.006479202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937976,0.0018455163,0.00042308145,0.0002730584,0.0020273225,0.0016333644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948861,0.0017256371,0.0012059119,0.00023761783,0.0008453402,0.0010993669],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025233498,0.00016981913,0.0003639294,0.0010756073,0.010381669,0.0046887845,0.001038221,0.0032989602,0.003171805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010735826,0.00024223259,0.00032670228,0.0013122782,0.012065863,0.002881193,0.0062688747,0.0045043626,0.0001157265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003230619,0.00008961994,0.06615182,0.00023964242,0.00004124249,0.0021237643,0.08415776,0.00028929833,0.00026069614,0.7150866,0.026901143,0.10462611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002619098,0.00011622172,0.21274121,0.0053437296,0.00008586808,0.004472725,0.21550661,0.00045257912,0.0005757468,0.122965,0.43754154,0.00017251424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3692618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59404075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6307382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012980853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027646963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7342249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7066197535","doi":"","title":"The \"Family\"—and \"Families\" in Law: A Review of Archana Parashar and Franscesca Dominello, <i>The Family In Law</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Optical Polarization and Ellipsometry","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"MEDLINE; Research methodology; Family health","score_opus":0.013403620788271129,"score_gpt":0.2195263242788712,"score_spread":0.20612270349060008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7066197535","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024109785,0.98734295,0.00021507751,0.007296314,0.0005709927,0.0000030182448,0.000011635022,0.000001959764,0.0043169186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008750798,0.98361856,0.00028873203,0.005020958,0.0012874536,0.000011137977,0.000017882126,0.0000073418623,0.0009971652],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790347,0.0010312496,0.00015738707,0.00021476061,0.0005633641,0.00012980393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99396896,0.0049413694,0.00025094164,0.00009902145,0.00057171524,0.00016796924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003896094,0.00074300263,0.001091295,0.0053900788,0.0024260979,0.005604501,0.0011130929,0.003890801,0.00298673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005384412,0.00047663128,0.00037536182,0.008499299,0.011320936,0.01010833,0.0024991254,0.004953405,0.00045792465],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038624272,0.00009090474,0.0010171672,0.006723828,0.000048079826,0.00015662072,0.0064567127,0.00025861626,0.00013748738,0.39639693,0.14360666,0.4450684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006020911,0.000024726707,0.0019756376,0.010480931,0.00002698421,0.000290529,0.0034177701,0.000076529126,0.000056442168,0.027338296,0.9562868,0.000019386202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024755793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037058063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024755793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048237345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0109401345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049223423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}