{"meta":{"query_hash":"ee5d03a82edb","filters":{"venue":"Carleton Economic Papers"},"cohort_total":16,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":16,"exported":16,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ee5d03a82edb","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Carleton+Economic+Papers"},"results":[{"id":"W1725052800","doi":"","title":"Stochastic Dominance, Estimation and Inference for Censored Distributions with Nuisance Parameter","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Carleton Economic Papers","topic":"Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Censoring (clinical trials); Nuisance parameter; Statistics; Parametric statistics; Econometrics; Nuisance; Mathematics; Dominance (genetics); Inference; Statistical hypothesis testing; Stochastic dominance; Nonparametric statistics; Computer science; Estimator","score_opus":0.021063188973349727,"score_gpt":0.31644911715335156,"score_spread":0.2953859281800018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1725052800","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05386236,0.0012721915,0.94188046,0.0006828247,0.000057151414,0.000094994946,0.00014908488,0.00016373319,0.0018371538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78786707,0.0019081961,0.2055048,0.00041912723,0.0003261136,0.00041706784,0.0007784893,0.00010773845,0.0026715149],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95735425,0.03418992,0.0011116378,0.0022755542,0.0038837437,0.001185027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5368739,0.43559706,0.010291659,0.009492246,0.0060162516,0.0017289649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.070739806,0.0013293611,0.0030247907,0.004573712,0.0014680891,0.0036043872,0.0029316437,0.0021193195,0.0021243596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.36795858,0.001069681,0.0018120472,0.003383634,0.006327042,0.006452405,0.003725494,0.0030808144,0.000261031],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003732133,0.00019823693,0.024300037,0.00048866746,0.0008195543,0.0010652267,0.00083119114,0.38303325,0.0016314334,0.502794,0.0023699487,0.082095265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005800211,0.00012774327,0.0036084366,0.00009668728,0.00005555557,0.0002501822,0.00016522258,0.61820775,0.00097038836,0.37536946,0.0010265847,0.00006396945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073147863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045367796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.070739806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025049876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031006667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3741123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111616389","doi":"","title":"Product Line Rivalry: A Further Analysis","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Carleton Economic Papers","topic":"Digital Platforms and Economics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Rivalry; Product line; Interlacing; Product (mathematics); Feature (linguistics); Line (geometry); Microeconomics; Asymmetry; Business; Economics; Industrial organization; Computer science; Engineering; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.026237281530494486,"score_gpt":0.1867606290620255,"score_spread":0.16052334753153102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111616389","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25532794,0.0031086577,0.30843285,0.0066335388,0.00015153449,0.00047895624,0.00066206994,0.0002399272,0.42496458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93273115,0.0017438602,0.02676862,0.00059744413,0.00019404387,0.00012629192,0.0002916293,0.000060473132,0.03748653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898154,0.0002926826,0.00003921469,0.0001132803,0.00034239807,0.00023091114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99579084,0.002378742,0.00039780795,0.0004668688,0.0008050431,0.00016064466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010282858,0.0007138222,0.0009882606,0.0019735827,0.0010936195,0.0031343917,0.0011225396,0.0016434533,0.04217082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004987804,0.00031462027,0.0020152195,0.0016130483,0.0012949137,0.0047972132,0.0016884555,0.0019858247,0.0027897898],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078702076,0.0002595323,0.0029587978,0.00018624616,0.000039017956,0.0009151355,0.00067635125,0.022380127,0.0033945553,0.93486196,0.0060529844,0.028196447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084499334,0.00038141047,0.0054791616,0.00014907957,0.000102030004,0.0019289876,0.0014823894,0.26109073,0.002435113,0.66964376,0.057138372,0.000084479754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033103705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001832143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04217082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013591768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086823036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14107543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135105892","doi":"","title":"A Contribution to the Political Economy of Government Size: 'Demand', 'Supply' and 'Political Influence'","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Carleton Economic Papers","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Taxable income; Politics; Economics; Government (linguistics); Voting; Public economics; Work (physics); Distribution (mathematics); Political science; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.007931875001296275,"score_gpt":0.20133748840232232,"score_spread":0.19340561340102605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135105892","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40438864,0.006467344,0.14083995,0.030392025,0.0002547411,0.000041210915,0.00056648237,0.00012512416,0.4169245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98957855,0.0016048087,0.0023758016,0.00029075425,0.0004446349,0.00001702788,0.000068841146,0.000046099787,0.005573502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988105,0.00036171873,0.000037842437,0.00023490642,0.00034793187,0.0002071293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99201536,0.0049179876,0.0011705566,0.0007120901,0.0007098431,0.00047408452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014729216,0.00033557817,0.00080350996,0.0014506812,0.0012847547,0.0036535973,0.0010426611,0.0012898362,0.015491148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008615833,0.0003294412,0.0005405858,0.0026760306,0.0044217734,0.0050007375,0.0028082763,0.0015816657,0.0011420453],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053335847,0.000047617286,0.011794382,0.00011846625,0.000025569085,0.00005712418,0.0010370259,0.006496274,0.0005846844,0.9533896,0.0016746115,0.024721328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003486067,0.00006484645,0.017624239,0.00008605354,0.00005233586,0.00019600222,0.0014411199,0.018111594,0.0009917882,0.9245203,0.03684365,0.000033261687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031934285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00259469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015491148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002358599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010986761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05182308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2239413023","doi":"","title":"Liability without control: The curious case of pension income splitting","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Carleton Economic Papers","topic":"Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pension; Annuity; Liability; Revenue; Labour economics; Control (management); Economics; Actuarial science; Pension fund; Business; Demographic economics; Life annuity; Finance","score_opus":0.007484207285713347,"score_gpt":0.2266796511296249,"score_spread":0.21919544384391157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2239413023","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016377488,0.0059355125,0.010628452,0.71218216,0.003270295,0.000062488136,0.00011560362,0.000047457565,0.2513805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5815164,0.004823416,0.0027844093,0.34419507,0.009482045,0.00015203339,0.00006415202,0.00011904161,0.056863442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9857815,0.0036372172,0.000489919,0.0021412256,0.004525994,0.0034242005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98899233,0.00706599,0.00050165324,0.00084589154,0.0017750263,0.0008190784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012600323,0.00043787775,0.00089922873,0.0008358115,0.010812103,0.0062458627,0.0033766043,0.031746916,0.0031082002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03224013,0.00050840457,0.0012115678,0.00079238776,0.024156693,0.00782428,0.004312208,0.024580266,0.00056935573],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001478519,0.000005486304,0.00039002858,0.000022272807,0.00000995562,0.0011719804,0.0031267402,0.000154154,0.0000855904,0.95063967,0.03943505,0.0049442644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006275112,0.000026466225,0.0014810592,0.0004686001,0.000047560086,0.0018293124,0.0033829683,0.0011848677,0.0003488789,0.66567326,0.3254109,0.00008338104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20105715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19586962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79894286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011586441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01806232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39977372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901259000","doi":"","title":"Short-Term and Long-Term Margins of International Trade: Evidence from the Canada-Chile Free Trade Agreement -forthcoming in Frontiers of Economics in China","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Carleton Economic Papers","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Margin (machine learning); Term (time); Economics; Free trade agreement; China; International economics; International trade; Medium term; Free trade; Geography; Macroeconomics; Physics","score_opus":0.030488338660138208,"score_gpt":0.207817765783434,"score_spread":0.1773294271232958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901259000","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99419326,0.00038184584,0.0000704258,0.00028594732,0.000004736913,0.000007495997,0.0005460751,0.0000045157335,0.0045056115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980301,0.00027244407,0.000028640323,0.000026652471,0.000005785799,0.0000034982713,0.00053734955,0.0000020907985,0.0010934086],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996339,0.000036683887,0.000017829498,0.000052875603,0.0001049407,0.00015369704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99629897,0.0008907131,0.0012380949,0.0001799289,0.0007746754,0.00061759824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008199723,0.00015583831,0.00028217823,0.0009229493,0.0013813167,0.0020633228,0.00048139915,0.00044846968,0.002979864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035366474,0.00008968789,0.00029149035,0.002135968,0.0015133972,0.000857633,0.0012561663,0.00079443393,0.0002515933],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005404613,0.00016562367,0.954043,0.00015366994,0.0001359695,0.00094494346,0.0051739607,0.006396006,0.0011116653,0.009085642,0.0032206823,0.01902844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025029669,0.00004642414,0.9836601,0.00004472497,0.00006470913,0.000043401502,0.0068478915,0.0022685279,0.0005691898,0.0015322935,0.0048594517,0.00003831192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7731076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81438047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22689241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00729138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006139433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4564572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3040819108","doi":"","title":"COVID-19, Occupation Tasks and Mental Health in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Carleton Economic Papers","topic":"COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mental health; Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Work (physics); Demographic economics; Perspective (graphical); Psychology; Survey data collection; Business; Medicine; Gerontology; Labour economics; Disease; Economics; Psychiatry; Infectious disease (medical specialty)","score_opus":0.037275299618788775,"score_gpt":0.2572811704412823,"score_spread":0.2200058708224935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3040819108","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9360705,0.004294191,0.00033189298,0.01128329,0.00015764713,0.000074485695,0.022338938,0.00003355374,0.025415491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886325,0.0016861438,0.00016112613,0.00039541617,0.000028161727,0.000015231178,0.0043174895,0.000008208421,0.0047558257],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880254,0.000069913345,0.000036581583,0.00007832313,0.00039917324,0.0006134193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99638724,0.00026800533,0.0006307241,0.00007369648,0.001300458,0.0013399052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000751831,0.00032345654,0.00040105794,0.0016997554,0.0032259582,0.0018637433,0.0009306804,0.00045823926,0.006340733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003754158,0.00020034213,0.0006186093,0.003878929,0.0009505892,0.00046060438,0.0016410984,0.0013727949,0.00032202146],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000092082024,0.000070236405,0.970031,0.00006350464,0.00008422454,0.00013911717,0.0009836466,0.0008964973,0.000070072354,0.0028949333,0.012109623,0.012565086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014603135,0.000017928807,0.989358,0.0000937877,0.00002755839,0.000032547243,0.0023678467,0.0007900119,0.00005025181,0.0003138038,0.00691438,0.000019208572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.998242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049943354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.049943354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.062063333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36236614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3097158195","doi":"","title":"What aggregate data can tell us about voter turnout in Canada; did changes in the distribution of income matter?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Carleton Economic Papers","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Turnout; Gini coefficient; Voter turnout; Economics; Cointegration; Demographic economics; Spurious relationship; Population; Distribution (mathematics); Inequality; Competition (biology); Aggregate data; Income distribution; Economic inequality; Politics; Econometrics; Political science; Demography; Voting; Sociology; Statistics","score_opus":0.03751264303992883,"score_gpt":0.2829999470900378,"score_spread":0.24548730405010896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3097158195","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9474476,0.0028105692,0.0008274583,0.0030725943,0.000054460226,0.000059265774,0.024149677,0.000047338388,0.021531023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877517,0.0012928882,0.00028304805,0.00016635505,0.00002328324,0.000011265571,0.0072270967,0.0000105600575,0.0032336896],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989477,0.00011766639,0.000048106467,0.00013666657,0.00040987632,0.00034006426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947856,0.00090515753,0.0009789597,0.00030526568,0.0024483833,0.00057669077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015050848,0.00029732537,0.00066676235,0.0037810365,0.0018742837,0.0020860834,0.00055919343,0.00028183166,0.0039694146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007206792,0.00017591893,0.00051048805,0.0072450624,0.000760272,0.0008671287,0.0009965759,0.0008181292,0.000471757],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011775567,0.000022621143,0.9703794,0.000104917206,0.00020246922,0.000056062243,0.0014383942,0.00071294117,0.00012554742,0.0013495155,0.0032184662,0.02227188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003748735,0.000011603413,0.9923333,0.000042270996,0.0000651809,0.000011434189,0.0015223757,0.0005963019,0.00009399048,0.00035370464,0.0049515003,0.000014657909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9869183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9938797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013187877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013187877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011581784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.095685184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124492892","doi":"","title":"Political Competition and Convergence to Fundamentals: With Application to the Politcal Business Cycle and the Size of the Public Sector","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Carleton Economic Papers","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Competition (biology); Economics; Convergence (economics); Business cycle; Public expenditure; Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Public policy; Public economics; Political science; Macroeconomics; Public finance; Economic growth; Law","score_opus":0.010563856790174493,"score_gpt":0.19376784121200102,"score_spread":0.18320398442182653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124492892","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9410206,0.0029338023,0.032041304,0.005990053,0.000064995926,0.0001844292,0.0005355301,0.00013040526,0.017098892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922821,0.0008442113,0.004625098,0.0001575298,0.00006590559,0.000040049395,0.00018702133,0.00002733925,0.0017707956],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983582,0.00072121766,0.00005909144,0.00025786852,0.00024106236,0.00036237825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97433645,0.019862078,0.0026787731,0.0008641543,0.0013924543,0.00086618983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053787506,0.00042618165,0.001322938,0.0033215499,0.0012561214,0.0025418836,0.00090398494,0.0012153855,0.004459804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031959195,0.00021464468,0.0014282628,0.005130508,0.0034280594,0.0013304296,0.0021848578,0.0018240528,0.0001494537],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045941857,0.00033040647,0.5208036,0.00035923428,0.00051084807,0.0016922242,0.0032992696,0.15012693,0.0016212679,0.19681597,0.0040762187,0.11990464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015100504,0.00040041213,0.24449158,0.00022085555,0.00028686647,0.00032302854,0.0036076584,0.5942224,0.001771029,0.1399039,0.014420711,0.0002004548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38266978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18784596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38266978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051676426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004862664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76088476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139941557","doi":"","title":"Cutural Issues in Trade Agreements: multiculturalism, liberalism and the NICD initiative","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Carleton Economic Papers","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Cultural diversity; Political science; Diversity (politics); Enforcement; Liberalism; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.02036825761409649,"score_gpt":0.25489519951474116,"score_spread":0.23452694190064466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3139941557","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03832072,0.015801266,0.009794895,0.18320139,0.0010895682,0.00009406806,0.000045873498,0.000039978164,0.75161225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8832234,0.0050453353,0.0073808236,0.035510935,0.00063403684,0.00023979848,0.00005858088,0.000050168182,0.06785691],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9753483,0.013862777,0.0008057119,0.0014006663,0.00479361,0.0037888656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9827407,0.01065897,0.0012180764,0.0015964938,0.0017733407,0.0020124826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02369109,0.00040565172,0.000514438,0.0016533998,0.020056859,0.02771062,0.0029758387,0.014055769,0.0065050735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025369948,0.00039652322,0.0006066866,0.0029953157,0.046236817,0.0096516935,0.016665298,0.013227253,0.0004439464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040956415,0.0000068813233,0.00011864189,0.00001670033,0.0000013199848,0.000048414935,0.001777237,0.00010065934,0.00002049038,0.9934831,0.0015740312,0.002848413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015983767,0.000015235157,0.0005631874,0.00041597112,0.000004795345,0.00012199202,0.0068665943,0.0005118628,0.0001554429,0.7230278,0.2682723,0.000028766746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06216999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08632413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06216999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036078677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039185528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26177037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3140907245","doi":"","title":"Politics, political competition and the political budget cycle in Canada, 1870 - 2000: a search across alternative fiscal instruments","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Carleton Economic Papers","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Competition (biology); Economics; Government (linguistics); Fiscal policy; Public economics; Public policy; Public expenditure; Macroeconomics; Economic policy; Public finance; Political economy; Political science; Economic growth","score_opus":0.01170567605953461,"score_gpt":0.2179719445690699,"score_spread":0.2062662685095353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3140907245","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9756739,0.003589702,0.00073174905,0.0020022818,0.000019869292,0.000028029599,0.0018860649,0.00001807633,0.01605029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99545056,0.0011288528,0.00028812443,0.000105729036,0.0000128553365,0.00000640144,0.0010321133,0.000007189573,0.0019682092],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994035,0.00006377032,0.000021138198,0.00009290842,0.00016044748,0.00025826733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99733895,0.00096885825,0.0007328173,0.000081071536,0.0005247195,0.00035362708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012790054,0.00027885073,0.00065804645,0.0033116103,0.0022081954,0.003040725,0.0006207716,0.00041770563,0.0037492213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046363766,0.00016052806,0.00047504032,0.007852351,0.0021569917,0.0006130411,0.00081697665,0.0008368041,0.000120758516],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051491294,0.00007412628,0.9085774,0.00013539492,0.00031091375,0.00027225868,0.0031840026,0.0075802915,0.00041356467,0.040835854,0.0032390247,0.034862243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033165197,0.000040294715,0.97262144,0.00008286568,0.00016679538,0.000036891128,0.003556525,0.00731241,0.00030167593,0.0034125582,0.012397462,0.00003795825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9846356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9897404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033903163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033903163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031987887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24598587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3146400373","doi":"","title":"Rules, Politics and the Normative Analysis of Taxation","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Carleton Economic Papers","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Positive economics; Politics; Allowance (engineering); Currency; State (computer science); Economics; Meaning (existential); Subject (documents); Law and economics; Tax policy; Epistemology; Public economics; Political science; Tax reform; Law; Macroeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.007685284695078877,"score_gpt":0.2500048101559796,"score_spread":0.24231952546090071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3146400373","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046237815,0.008695418,0.0649437,0.04775012,0.0007053089,0.000060170634,0.00012568606,0.00006679039,0.83141506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9588062,0.003172018,0.010192338,0.0030794092,0.0005927611,0.00012438344,0.000066859146,0.0000763278,0.023889663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99291044,0.0033350626,0.00032469822,0.00086431304,0.0019928839,0.00057262846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961085,0.0022012661,0.00040205196,0.00052824867,0.0006455105,0.0001144962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071813036,0.00040146877,0.00062629447,0.0019068425,0.0045764833,0.010577603,0.0011016977,0.0030910566,0.0020496908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010348624,0.0003525337,0.00066188007,0.001440757,0.027975189,0.007791809,0.002651368,0.0041915285,0.0004971642],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.438782e-7,0.0000010198783,0.00002958534,0.0000024645835,7.610178e-7,0.0000027945664,0.00015009423,0.00017776074,0.000007722988,0.9989465,0.00023971338,0.00044089786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018155087,0.0000011280912,0.00007123582,0.000017238443,0.0000012363089,0.00000604252,0.000106741485,0.00039143383,0.00004529553,0.9884477,0.010907612,0.0000024880867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005710018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035271891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010577603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008346436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004723915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06055796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3150863609","doi":"","title":"Currency Crises, Exchange Rate Regimes, and Capital Account Liberalization: A Duration Analysis Approach","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Carleton Economic Papers","topic":"Global Financial Crisis and Policies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Currency; Economics; Exchange rate; De facto; Monetary economics; Currency crisis; Capital (architecture); Capital control; Exchange-rate regime; Foreign exchange risk; Liberalization; Duration (music); International economics; Capital account; Capital outflow; Capital flows; Capital formation; Financial capital","score_opus":0.036077562186488873,"score_gpt":0.216159789127249,"score_spread":0.18008222694076015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3150863609","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97772354,0.0023440244,0.011273012,0.00045679064,0.000026630187,0.00007386263,0.0016903691,0.00003122328,0.0063805846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942321,0.0008777134,0.0018134547,0.000064801985,0.00006847333,0.00009491588,0.0012732955,0.000010233644,0.0015650096],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986368,0.0007839977,0.00008565333,0.00015740511,0.00016528876,0.00017101635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97767,0.016802045,0.004055327,0.0004550211,0.00030200285,0.00071557396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036720992,0.00046638324,0.0008284055,0.0031828103,0.00051049434,0.0017323688,0.00071947096,0.00081291754,0.0077907103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011864267,0.0002526117,0.001346515,0.002764798,0.00066793454,0.0014656069,0.0016056233,0.0014217821,0.00036665192],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013453816,0.0003514124,0.88234276,0.0002705182,0.0020689147,0.0004290938,0.0015888188,0.044284556,0.0012232515,0.019609269,0.0016520314,0.04483404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013916135,0.00089117937,0.81879,0.0001761854,0.0010146876,0.0003456791,0.0022379423,0.15126528,0.0010040059,0.017402185,0.006616726,0.00011701452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010862114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074890866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010862114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008273165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006135827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026062548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3151492282","doi":"","title":"What determines the length of a typical Canadian parliamentary government","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Carleton Economic Papers","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Distribution (mathematics); Politics; Government (linguistics); Economics; Political science; General election; Categorization; Public economics; Function (biology); Political economy; Law","score_opus":0.033844715926060934,"score_gpt":0.2785689413701449,"score_spread":0.24472422544408395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3151492282","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9593547,0.0008759757,0.0014375977,0.002276002,0.000050538234,0.00004793926,0.0025979104,0.00006683758,0.033292424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99427164,0.00021416806,0.0004278909,0.000066587236,0.000020521256,0.000008728974,0.0006566229,0.000012385791,0.004321423],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99766856,0.00015344226,0.000070648464,0.00027606942,0.0007547721,0.0010765467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99248874,0.00092610024,0.0017622,0.00037788384,0.0023841804,0.002060934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001676351,0.00012454133,0.0003434709,0.0024324118,0.0045064585,0.0023586676,0.0012466409,0.00060850725,0.008111965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011276649,0.00020302761,0.0004108832,0.002628452,0.0018287061,0.00089358614,0.0008890303,0.0008027691,0.0007669981],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003907929,0.00007133406,0.8302858,0.00019277343,0.0002157688,0.00035570498,0.010579435,0.0033645767,0.0038271656,0.035821795,0.010048953,0.10484595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070638125,0.000028818911,0.9801081,0.000041830972,0.000017926332,0.00007996158,0.0023303959,0.0005825795,0.0002450792,0.0009966894,0.015523948,0.000037684826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9142914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9665759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08570862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027092213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017125322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19656867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172890739","doi":"","title":"Forecasting Canadian GDP growth using XGBoost","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Carleton Economic Papers","topic":"Data-Driven Disease Surveillance","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nowcasting; Gradient boosting; Computer science; Econometrics; Feature selection; Boosting (machine learning); Vector autoregression; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.05042131887868386,"score_gpt":0.24209908208591935,"score_spread":0.19167776320723548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3172890739","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5619193,0.003750085,0.3865018,0.0037617509,0.000688884,0.0002640796,0.008215194,0.0053760125,0.029522937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89856565,0.0010555562,0.08538929,0.0002583919,0.00007197654,0.0000963158,0.005770608,0.0001268087,0.0086655095],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995964,0.000066571585,0.000013370661,0.0000669494,0.0001712803,0.00008545108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994929,0.00013752308,0.000049016944,0.00002926804,0.0002563911,0.00003494824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010903036,0.0008564876,0.0006043409,0.0014563522,0.00056941353,0.001098335,0.0009977211,0.00049960456,0.0016440323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025593853,0.00028248105,0.00050145405,0.0026549096,0.00041751712,0.0004318492,0.00038822446,0.0007296243,0.00039761848],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009733915,0.000040960233,0.009980622,0.000047244994,0.000058966536,0.000047377056,0.0000302524,0.8970718,0.00039800536,0.0025145875,0.00908043,0.08063244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006201594,0.000005722146,0.0019001777,0.0000047245967,0.000004605233,0.0000023100804,0.000011919619,0.9959317,0.00029299172,0.00047873304,0.0013559058,0.000005042091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78382593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7295935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21617407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006325963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006667614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43489426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185130270","doi":"","title":"Forecasting Canadian GDP Growth with Machine Learning","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Carleton Economic Papers","topic":"Forecasting Techniques and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Random forest; Sample (material); Variable (mathematics); Real gross domestic product; Econometrics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Data set; Term (time); Machine learning; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07171066533869278,"score_gpt":0.28833728777517,"score_spread":0.2166266224364772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3185130270","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8584048,0.00290062,0.085143276,0.0041654403,0.00027697592,0.00012287848,0.017266238,0.0036563282,0.028063446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9640572,0.0008521468,0.023184996,0.00009612202,0.000041273575,0.000038778184,0.008022757,0.00005932572,0.0036473789],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99967754,0.00004219889,0.000011579236,0.00005964987,0.00014727288,0.00006179784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994553,0.00012474772,0.000054274795,0.00003322932,0.0002935565,0.000038842492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061238674,0.00072927814,0.00037157154,0.0014586388,0.0005700763,0.0010702596,0.0007047447,0.0003451211,0.0014519789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027405233,0.00023464268,0.0005292055,0.0026263413,0.00030907415,0.0004888531,0.00041392865,0.0006438758,0.00041680608],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083151834,0.000036664333,0.030645754,0.00006562331,0.000054994347,0.00007372319,0.000039237486,0.8824707,0.00044003362,0.003128509,0.009859794,0.07310188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053956323,0.0000054084244,0.008948091,0.000008557636,0.0000075581825,0.00000419512,0.000022102311,0.98761785,0.0003986884,0.0006208817,0.0023497,0.0000115263465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94820476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94161963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051795244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010565637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009663542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10420048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211916329","doi":"","title":"Does Income Inequality enter into an Aggregate Model of Voter Turnout? Evidence from Canada and Indian States","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Carleton Economic Papers","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Turnout; Voter turnout; Inequality; Economic inequality; Demographic economics; Economics; Econometrics; Political science; Voting; Mathematics; Politics","score_opus":0.021360273502873277,"score_gpt":0.2854266928423146,"score_spread":0.2640664193394413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211916329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9859844,0.00017436157,0.0010490639,0.0010302272,0.000008320015,0.000020304791,0.00061716646,0.000021335403,0.011094862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984261,0.000074339856,0.00012607212,0.000031038468,0.0000042500183,0.000003809768,0.00023679336,0.000003453254,0.0010942189],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934155,0.0001363678,0.000014847666,0.00009278455,0.00010745956,0.00030693735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985483,0.0003652978,0.0002680467,0.00016444256,0.00035371236,0.000300182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011552101,0.0002843853,0.00052534667,0.0012645592,0.0015062002,0.001987968,0.00074707123,0.00032409024,0.004040717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003328745,0.000153142,0.00077542686,0.0019884014,0.0011825473,0.000696355,0.0008816683,0.00085019215,0.00036182074],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002047376,0.000103508886,0.94741935,0.000034216588,0.00016765954,0.00016055624,0.0021855251,0.015729569,0.0002811169,0.018827634,0.0017736857,0.013112495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029052462,0.000067438734,0.9285439,0.000040098057,0.00019027658,0.00006348995,0.0038875306,0.05504954,0.00022959113,0.0067349887,0.005131492,0.00003244373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91168064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91527563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08831936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076065497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004822439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17767894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}