{"meta":{"query_hash":"ea9e19ec9e35","filters":{"venue":"Chicago journal of international law"},"cohort_total":15,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":15,"exported":15,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ea9e19ec9e35","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Chicago+journal+of+international+law"},"results":[{"id":"W122955574","doi":"","title":"Private Enforcement of International Human Rights Laws: Could a Small Church Group Successfully Combat Slavery in the Sudan?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; Enforcement; Charter; Political science; International human rights law; International law; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.030043482922977396,"score_gpt":0.2975461276090341,"score_spread":0.2675026446860567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W122955574","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6103133,0.00007546723,0.00011497585,0.0030586415,0.0015911541,0.00020361973,0.000032385524,0.000011975865,0.3845985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99327374,0.00006801898,0.0002574807,0.0006666699,0.0011499142,0.000009161317,0.00002984286,0.000012695143,0.0045324555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963537,0.00025300027,0.0010722089,0.00020523177,0.0018302045,0.00028565686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99783164,0.00031307098,0.00083238375,0.00018069077,0.0007433923,0.0000988254],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00156182,0.00019454543,0.00030326145,0.00033629456,0.0004444513,0.00022334357,0.0021723085,0.00011569966,0.0039671436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007207914,0.00013740947,0.00027948982,0.000120196404,0.0005447795,0.0005898673,0.00009675503,0.00053749414,0.00002696295],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006860098,0.00049313926,0.0014700104,0.0000066419466,0.00017486692,0.00007388871,0.0033545408,0.00005046504,0.00024767188,0.99308604,0.00090518716,0.0000689321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028395616,0.0003915224,0.012222913,0.00039538855,0.00005715944,0.00010175494,0.0003515674,0.00027379315,0.0007752014,0.35495764,0.62724227,0.00039122172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019391781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007938836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6381284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031146864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004201926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99694335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1489088844","doi":"","title":"Judicial Tactics in the European Court of Human Rights","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Political science; Law; State (computer science); Compliance (psychology); Order (exchange); Law and economics; Business; Psychology; Economics; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.05064117342327562,"score_gpt":0.31757337864074914,"score_spread":0.2669322052174735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1489088844","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11308208,0.000056534776,0.000027313024,0.0010523233,0.0006464946,0.000039836832,0.0000048984252,0.0000038463513,0.88508666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980979,0.00007244855,0.00019883337,0.00032674806,0.0008697091,3.4735797e-7,0.0000011969055,0.0000060941957,0.0004267315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982729,0.00040720214,0.00048119843,0.00006955146,0.00066203345,0.00010714324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887574,0.00012404732,0.00042567548,0.00007203172,0.0004641715,0.0000383158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018722205,0.000069633745,0.00013063628,0.00009435036,0.00022101201,0.000023738921,0.00086244784,0.000019516756,0.00022350907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014759065,0.000046661364,0.000112285015,0.000082022314,0.00041488963,0.00022708121,0.00004392867,0.00023245631,0.000018433026],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027080605,0.00017309535,0.0017834157,0.0000012510981,0.00006319094,0.000061710234,0.008581893,0.0000011331178,0.000109807355,0.98685247,0.0022252463,0.000119730415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009837912,0.00033209342,0.12405894,0.00019740018,0.00004550141,0.0000526952,0.0025392957,0.0000036424135,0.00082523614,0.080381155,0.7903891,0.00019110953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00088605203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025205798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9064713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047705464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027329972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24472675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579027523","doi":"","title":"Classical Liberalism Meets the New Constitutional Order: A Comment on Mark Tushnet","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitution; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Political science; Judicial review; Sociology","score_opus":0.032503338675555944,"score_gpt":0.28933969375296953,"score_spread":0.2568363550774136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579027523","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009532314,0.00049519807,0.00029358434,0.5243368,0.0018078435,0.00007561643,0.00001466765,0.000012145149,0.4720109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96957695,0.0006211603,0.0003274018,0.024253894,0.0028683876,0.000003062498,0.0000026912396,0.0000040214695,0.002342403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814767,0.00012373041,0.000369405,0.00011309556,0.0010581419,0.00018794781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987599,0.00038647605,0.00022753062,0.00007193738,0.0003983262,0.00015578065],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004430473,0.00011101024,0.00016596793,0.000055871005,0.00074793375,0.00011568845,0.00053090166,0.00005568593,0.001405956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036374043,0.000072502495,0.00015680486,0.00013605501,0.0018584104,0.00018938242,0.000060704577,0.0003371644,0.00012599131],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003881859,0.000110364505,0.000121870726,3.309665e-7,0.00011187429,0.000019189061,0.0005242565,0.000045351364,0.000006438154,0.8003565,0.1974924,0.0011725945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044503083,0.000059662663,0.00044657488,0.00005716354,0.000019960351,0.00004200536,0.00015252712,0.000025772744,0.00001583478,0.052286696,0.94636536,0.00008341445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041116076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037114357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96862376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018257624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002133093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1604224115","doi":"","title":"Legal Aspects of the Security-Development Nexus: International Administrative Law as a Check on the Use of Development Assistance in the \"War on Terror\"","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"International law; Political science; Legitimacy; Terrorism; Law; Administrative law; Public administration; Public international law; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.06353154786136958,"score_gpt":0.3278952125751955,"score_spread":0.2643636647138259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1604224115","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65563256,0.000024831399,0.000014763363,0.009440885,0.0015052293,0.0002127744,0.000018574421,0.000004201481,0.33314615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99543536,0.0000068389986,0.00022466341,0.0022918237,0.0004987821,0.000011132907,0.0000051799834,0.000009277127,0.0015169556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965119,0.000311467,0.0008151844,0.00013719841,0.0020025186,0.00022174933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977153,0.0005995735,0.00087369006,0.00016595195,0.0005771969,0.00006830291],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015748397,0.00016668318,0.0002033556,0.00010442692,0.0003644756,0.00012070774,0.0014799646,0.00007055474,0.0003360127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033070252,0.00008596838,0.00017558658,0.000097786935,0.00054810965,0.00051926624,0.000077803954,0.0005146531,0.00001722458],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018437702,0.00051382324,0.00041135657,0.0000034352627,0.0001624446,0.000008765765,0.021294495,0.000028746144,0.00005147359,0.9769088,0.0003797913,0.00005246123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007116517,0.00016023593,0.02387139,0.0006239745,0.000020137937,0.000041997897,0.0024030476,0.000015703925,0.011454059,0.06550548,0.8949744,0.00021792327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022204053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003470012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91140336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003825139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006060309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36791033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W211475630","doi":"","title":"State Action is Always Present","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social contract; Democracy; Law; Constitution; Law and economics; Political science; State (computer science); Liberal democracy; Tort; Sociology; Politics; Liability","score_opus":0.05852217317198346,"score_gpt":0.3253231613675265,"score_spread":0.26680098819554304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W211475630","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.063964814,0.0010311067,0.00045879945,0.052575614,0.0029854972,0.000075062664,0.000020273223,0.0000205789,0.8788683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992891,0.0019031247,0.00011473125,0.000980345,0.0014361332,0.0000011904706,5.24523e-7,0.0000030234103,0.0026699414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998849,0.000044148044,0.00025034507,0.000070710565,0.00066425867,0.000121584366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918467,0.000072069735,0.00020053874,0.00003669894,0.00042538822,0.00008065895],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002575189,0.000058430967,0.000100708814,0.000055376735,0.00033618705,0.00006323063,0.00024914063,0.000027160886,0.0013656731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009503026,0.000048768285,0.000108238346,0.00007824189,0.00031780355,0.0003303524,0.000030452107,0.00014611943,0.000096440264],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050116203,0.00020042466,0.0017783185,0.0000021291132,0.00027750846,0.000035935907,0.0054001864,0.000063998785,0.00021529033,0.9327242,0.043951664,0.015300231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021726645,0.00003446121,0.001714703,0.000028648692,0.000012346847,0.00001768955,0.00041658038,0.000036537484,0.00031737966,0.045219015,0.9519162,0.00006912477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00071848807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048021876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92892617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011468616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004093966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99954724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W213016018","doi":"","title":"Who Then Should Judge?: Developing the International Rule of Law under NAFTA Chapter 11","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Investment protection; Bilateral investment treaty; Arbitration; Investment (military); Treaty; International trade; Investor-state dispute settlement; International law; Surprise; State (computer science); Foreign direct investment; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics; International economics; International investment; Sociology","score_opus":0.04689294605375161,"score_gpt":0.26952557013106954,"score_spread":0.22263262407731793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W213016018","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0958014,0.000071369395,0.0023124274,0.053325366,0.003016192,0.00013423053,0.0000100338,0.000024081955,0.8453049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9299636,0.00007117625,0.00045228968,0.06574445,0.0022817994,0.0000041126636,0.000026665073,0.00002505894,0.0014308838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774814,0.000014720762,0.00082259724,0.00017711712,0.0010584998,0.00017890986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975974,0.00009569827,0.00087302073,0.0001619812,0.0012486998,0.000023187435],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061599695,0.0001977357,0.00023214077,0.0002344191,0.00017331888,0.00033199217,0.0011886597,0.00006577342,0.0016560092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008914025,0.00013695477,0.00024165677,0.000119790864,0.00024098152,0.0016225711,0.00021350953,0.00027769915,0.00009301985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096162665,0.000081895174,0.0013452013,0.0000072122875,0.00021684341,0.000013865216,0.00005837808,0.00019693482,0.0012915609,0.99516153,0.0013856059,0.00014479732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091349677,0.0000184282,0.004248578,0.00017030211,0.00004329915,0.00011507082,0.00013114359,0.0016488904,0.0022851916,0.11484894,0.8753694,0.00020722098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002835739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002725022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8803126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009535061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042108015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W257037218","doi":"","title":"The Market for Treaties","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Context (archaeology); Political science; International law; Law; Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties; Convention; Business; Public international law; Geography","score_opus":0.012842443035598379,"score_gpt":0.2665454784718698,"score_spread":0.25370303543627143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W257037218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5725644,0.00010210636,0.00024511598,0.024767436,0.006516531,0.0002243449,0.000016256028,0.000024453882,0.3955393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939047,0.000015224364,0.00014364076,0.0010902509,0.0038181348,0.000002552334,0.0000030295794,0.000008472743,0.0010139892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927574,0.0000063074153,0.00026953666,0.00006088176,0.0002499482,0.00013759382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987074,0.00018190379,0.00028424256,0.0000790697,0.00073299184,0.000014398857],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064045,0.00007910168,0.00010606004,0.000049566806,0.00026780815,0.00041947924,0.00041538413,0.00003818438,0.000096156204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008371735,0.000049065784,0.00018240881,0.000056932495,0.00014994,0.000604782,0.000037402497,0.0001864091,0.000004711537],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023063271,0.00008690134,0.004965776,0.000019596464,0.0001111901,0.000004201256,0.000112773036,0.00000512888,0.0001428461,0.97096443,0.01999017,0.0033663588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053256156,0.000021087362,0.015242174,0.000013678488,0.000040292143,0.000010091853,0.00091988774,0.00015236657,0.000047346395,0.15260912,0.8303286,0.00008280453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000079640304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024861225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8183553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029897295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030547628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4045048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W263206028","doi":"","title":"Preemption and Law in the Twenty-First Century[dagger]","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; United Nations Charter; Doctrine; National security; Charter; Preemption; Political science; Customary international law; International law; Presumption; Supremacy Clause; Federalism; Public international law; Politics","score_opus":0.013195197954361828,"score_gpt":0.2881807861697503,"score_spread":0.2749855882153885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W263206028","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39263624,0.00040581953,0.00017964414,0.0637787,0.0013093066,0.00018073671,0.000013554201,0.000012921886,0.54148304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951843,0.00052439753,0.0003244623,0.002105717,0.0014857841,0.0000024734577,0.000005317516,0.0000047120734,0.0003628307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863297,0.00011444672,0.00034022337,0.000087531036,0.00070020213,0.00012463723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992156,0.00018264049,0.00024750395,0.000054243254,0.00025068145,0.00004931563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010833706,0.000070197275,0.00009072925,0.00007725754,0.0002350767,0.00016037129,0.00039886645,0.000051095107,0.00015796977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010802057,0.000051247353,0.000069890506,0.00006991487,0.00018788413,0.000667019,0.000023955048,0.00022192756,0.000016572907],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032415006,0.000087258006,0.001597157,0.0000016936232,0.000018187242,0.0000057988004,0.0031144305,0.00006598548,0.000041447573,0.9937165,0.0003535423,0.0009655798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005220221,0.000040970575,0.013303601,0.00007432632,0.000010149374,0.000044930413,0.0006150029,0.00008990592,0.00009827071,0.01740169,0.96771723,0.000081884995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00070005865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01077889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97631484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015047294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040291754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60148734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2935025186","doi":"","title":"A Comparative Analysis of the Regulation of State and Provincial Governments in NAFTA and GATT/WTO","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Free trade; International trade law; Trade barrier; International economic law; General Agreement on Trade in Services; Economics; Political science; State (computer science); Comparative advantage; International economics; Liberalization; Position (finance); International free trade agreement; International law; Public international law; Law","score_opus":0.014221932301563166,"score_gpt":0.29935711023021105,"score_spread":0.2851351779286479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2935025186","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9864896,0.00007437043,0.000011389172,0.004084103,0.000047256362,0.000045469005,0.000108329485,3.1377616e-7,0.009139168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989482,0.000059582744,0.00007824591,0.00021351308,0.00006913129,3.4929064e-7,4.2048464e-7,0.0000010832621,0.0006294399],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991815,0.000061040046,0.0002730581,0.000049983973,0.00037692202,0.000057501344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992773,0.00007821116,0.00045802968,0.000036612168,0.00011136474,0.000038508675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031343833,0.000036734215,0.00014851212,0.00007430357,0.000042257874,0.000014936149,0.0001323462,0.000019395186,0.000037815655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009251085,0.000028416769,0.0000503977,0.00017339429,0.0002560974,0.00018430494,0.000022960585,0.0000719927,1.4786222e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048537288,0.00026163633,0.20263016,0.000018505505,0.0011880595,0.0000035538358,0.05146561,0.0026277083,0.005257638,0.7289619,0.0020175749,0.0050823228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000398433,0.000026499005,0.97368336,0.00005733325,0.000058315705,0.000002477724,0.00025362524,0.00059280003,0.0010106731,0.0021070787,0.021766476,0.000042903826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007226272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16626664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77105325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012436452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009816125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992833385","doi":"","title":"Strengthening the Wassenaar Export Control Regime","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"Defense, Military, and Policy Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Summit; Political science; Communism; Cold war; Economic history; Law; International trade; Politics; Business; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.03540545628211968,"score_gpt":0.23001982958849834,"score_spread":0.19461437330637865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2992833385","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16213034,0.014613468,0.0009800479,0.045489497,0.003597428,0.00012842969,0.0001768844,0.00002121172,0.7728627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928405,0.00082281046,0.00017488371,0.0019868945,0.0010006158,0.0000023855694,0.0000012922258,0.000011721342,0.0031588634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988773,0.000016693552,0.0007406597,0.000116615156,0.00009463951,0.00015411545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989258,0.00017648398,0.0005721289,0.00015035963,0.000119448996,0.000055779346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052835344,0.00010586962,0.00026682278,0.000107102365,0.00012657234,0.000052440766,0.00041216845,0.000036523183,0.0006168658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024403949,0.0000793908,0.00021600403,0.00006146374,0.000120700905,0.000192997,0.00003015309,0.00024401792,0.00021123205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034590877,0.00009121346,0.011140696,0.0000042411684,0.0005024501,0.000023366956,0.0012862007,0.00010462412,0.000014851876,0.9522299,0.03400085,0.00056700746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011654098,0.00010804979,0.01087846,0.000033731943,0.000018409357,0.00018135205,0.00019143768,0.0010815825,0.000039353057,0.0416307,0.94450086,0.00017063261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000044855344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017832086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91059923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051288946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000054303096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6754248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993411955","doi":"","title":"NAFTA Chapter 11 Meets Chicken Little","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Free trade; Law; Political science; Appeal; Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Globalization; Economics; Politics; International trade","score_opus":0.01766032840991081,"score_gpt":0.23626038052783357,"score_spread":0.21860005211792277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993411955","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09893043,0.00007003315,0.0003220351,0.019610185,0.0024440216,0.000078315155,0.000003835141,0.000026771615,0.87851435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96249384,0.0000517965,0.00033618484,0.03095373,0.0037965495,0.0000023123557,0.000022363272,0.000020227919,0.0023229772],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851215,0.0000070232136,0.0005392819,0.00014236833,0.0006439075,0.00015528618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858093,0.000030754367,0.0005197781,0.00011024951,0.00072989124,0.000028418615],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003242921,0.00015001277,0.0001692469,0.00025878026,0.00010988655,0.00028446096,0.00053753116,0.000047971866,0.0033769715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000092875736,0.00012322319,0.00018666958,0.000107597916,0.00009246576,0.0017468662,0.000089554174,0.00018937181,0.00043721276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007188306,0.0001092953,0.0018346673,0.000004935841,0.00007711313,0.000050960898,0.000016850345,0.00004988413,0.000999374,0.9938423,0.0027281991,0.0002145135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007095696,0.000019812476,0.0030044278,0.000063186046,0.000022682683,0.00014449559,0.000020651225,0.0011588119,0.00051119115,0.023671314,0.97052807,0.0001457839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009178823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000110084264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97017103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046932808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017055261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994096560","doi":"","title":"The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, NAFTA Chapter 11, and the Doctrine of Indirect Expropriation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Law; Investment (military); Political science; Doctrine; International trade law; International trade; Economics","score_opus":0.016339020963572527,"score_gpt":0.23215312107247016,"score_spread":0.21581410010889762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994096560","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.804472,0.00028619147,0.000713873,0.051022336,0.0015677398,0.0003042792,0.000010203744,0.00002058984,0.14160272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888125,0.0005254954,0.000059639908,0.009133127,0.0009173162,0.0000045199386,0.000035804485,0.00001017319,0.00050139794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985968,0.00002679267,0.0006088501,0.00009285695,0.0005638946,0.00011082161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980598,0.00022014385,0.0008257454,0.000096214404,0.00078374724,0.0000143397765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093307055,0.000117096206,0.00016647181,0.00020370184,0.00022170362,0.00028005743,0.00040280825,0.000031650074,0.0002279774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016497806,0.000062166866,0.00012177982,0.00016572974,0.00029370742,0.0007518888,0.00007328472,0.00017502972,0.000012713945],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052837783,0.00004933424,0.0013905031,0.0000057923617,0.00012910468,0.000004653372,0.00006814989,0.0000959199,0.00033516472,0.9964269,0.0006680397,0.0002980742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033871057,0.00003883251,0.005955997,0.00008433392,0.00006317724,0.00007271526,0.00015972307,0.009058853,0.0010358586,0.08125447,0.8987576,0.00013138908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015681147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012802242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9151724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025130772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010636853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123770762","doi":"","title":"Environmental Cooperation in the (Partially) Disaggregated State: Lessons from the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prosperity; Political science; Politics; General partnership; Government (linguistics); Foreign policy; Sociology; Public administration; Political economy; Law","score_opus":0.02206280684032421,"score_gpt":0.2779808652757152,"score_spread":0.255918058435391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123770762","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9769309,0.00019716428,0.000007530765,0.021048915,0.00006957501,0.000088128785,0.00021396759,0.0000010371785,0.00144275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99751586,0.00079578685,0.000012296675,0.0014175032,0.00019695789,0.0000024227022,0.000008048335,0.0000023526525,0.000048763988],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989671,0.00020428021,0.00022751688,0.00006734286,0.00044124434,0.00009247735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941075,0.00018563206,0.00024163816,0.00006430178,0.000048450307,0.00004919947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036290142,0.0000511738,0.00009093554,0.00001457415,0.00019015987,0.00003335048,0.0002957224,0.000019068966,0.00006254068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017326704,0.000032502165,0.000039420658,0.000077083045,0.0007048009,0.00019385277,0.00001766974,0.00018512455,0.0000012890374],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005087978,0.00076655485,0.5767973,0.0000060007033,0.0002494102,0.00013792538,0.26872283,0.0005959759,0.00032038242,0.12576456,0.015896464,0.010233778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004745168,0.000045743018,0.8107538,0.000028538783,0.000013364027,0.000021621381,0.0008233796,0.00013506146,0.00014322708,0.0021758338,0.1853086,0.00007629992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017055735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16717188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26789945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000075930715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014374345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9894898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125163359","doi":"","title":"A New Approach to an Old Problem: Managing Fish Resources in the Beaufort Sea","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; Maritime boundary; Arctic; Exclusive economic zone; Fishery; Tragedy of the commons; Natural resource; Geography; Political science; Environmental resource management; Convention; International law; Oceanography; Commons; Law; Environmental science; Geology","score_opus":0.05036104315188384,"score_gpt":0.31140684562137916,"score_spread":0.2610458024694953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125163359","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026694832,0.000027029744,0.0006510923,0.03764109,0.00019767274,0.0001216042,0.0000029432556,0.00000827634,0.9346555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838872,0.000049846523,0.008007385,0.004544108,0.0009086681,0.0000036834408,7.195208e-7,0.0000063012867,0.0025921094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988464,0.000115668394,0.00026880196,0.00010133626,0.0004958885,0.00017189793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995047,0.000057213852,0.00015184571,0.000082978426,0.00008408203,0.000119219905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010781784,0.00007079678,0.000116227726,0.00010570666,0.0002331921,0.00007325127,0.00079644687,0.000032006403,0.0000812906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007967202,0.000045307865,0.000067677356,0.00014615408,0.0001355487,0.00028088663,0.000056661356,0.0002111091,0.000007804449],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005803702,0.0001275782,0.006763545,0.0000036488539,0.00006629966,0.000015158972,0.16005597,0.00001677779,0.0000019269974,0.813509,0.017530806,0.0018512417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005645244,0.00015715905,0.07926955,0.00013345252,0.000036101275,0.00007749915,0.029384911,0.00002824186,0.000017763701,0.10155024,0.788561,0.000219571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007636437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005064304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95719236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005933114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006213106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W317880880","doi":"","title":"The Normative Cycle of Shaping Judicial Independence in Domestic and International Law: The Mutual Impact of National and International Jurisprudence and Contemporary Practical and Conceptual Challenges","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Judicial independence; International law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Judicial activism; Independence (probability theory); Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.0766466413985528,"score_gpt":0.39361136330008134,"score_spread":0.3169647219015285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W317880880","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7912014,0.0067508207,0.00008027091,0.03940394,0.00084992696,0.000258319,0.000115115705,0.000009836331,0.16133036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914817,0.007530211,0.00017178679,0.00035926313,0.0003482537,0.0000021245255,0.000003379592,0.0000060798284,0.000097201824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977814,0.00023534097,0.0006830719,0.00018528978,0.0009692101,0.00014567033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99656415,0.0016106245,0.00068024074,0.000057650082,0.0009971138,0.00009022428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018290399,0.00014860164,0.00024946575,0.00011071648,0.0002570615,0.00013575687,0.0004396742,0.00006642921,0.0000238506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015614752,0.00009861312,0.00007381949,0.00007036081,0.002286198,0.0009185645,0.00017719486,0.00040626596,7.6062656e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032253508,0.00009473575,0.004023518,0.000004027222,0.00024067737,0.0000134099855,0.0075042215,0.000020419206,0.00012518423,0.9854439,0.0001907806,0.0020166032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004951857,0.0013369913,0.71998554,0.0009810728,0.00006504195,0.0009716104,0.019569514,0.0023199457,0.00014390452,0.22111748,0.027991155,0.00056591554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024901624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005003918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7643264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010723322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025140797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8423592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}