{"meta":{"query_hash":"ea9e19ec9e35","filters":{"venue":"Chicago journal of international law"},"cohort_total":15,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":15,"exported":15,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ea9e19ec9e35","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Chicago+journal+of+international+law"},"results":[{"id":"W122955574","doi":"","title":"Private Enforcement of International Human Rights Laws: Could a Small Church Group Successfully Combat Slavery in the Sudan?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; Enforcement; Charter; Political science; International human rights law; International law; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.030043482922977396,"score_gpt":0.2975461276090341,"score_spread":0.2675026446860567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W122955574","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6699895,0.0024888793,0.0046941624,0.13240977,0.0008115966,0.00033163195,0.000041975432,0.00005044532,0.18918198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9543761,0.0010969646,0.0020548834,0.008244986,0.0001402871,0.000061674175,0.000019513553,0.000009450502,0.03399622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987993,0.00058314775,0.0000122615775,0.00006023417,0.00008682287,0.00045826822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988921,0.00021868446,0.00011596149,0.00008685346,0.00010439037,0.0005819158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025344132,0.00024086484,0.000151457,0.00048067851,0.011427358,0.0031398647,0.00062953355,0.0021098154,0.007436425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002449142,0.00012168697,0.00019953346,0.00035086097,0.0041390574,0.002500626,0.0033480183,0.001730424,0.0005946927],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022871756,0.0019791157,0.03711506,0.00033311074,0.00003107211,0.0036296886,0.08016773,0.00075691426,0.0071196137,0.49137288,0.03838585,0.33888024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001956116,0.0011733704,0.052132566,0.0008741462,0.000049571972,0.0011018858,0.20476349,0.0031919898,0.003675602,0.054578763,0.6781971,0.00006593287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017934453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.070762664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017934453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025142771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007994425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035660088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1489088844","doi":"","title":"Judicial Tactics in the European Court of Human Rights","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Political science; Law; State (computer science); Compliance (psychology); Order (exchange); Law and economics; Business; Psychology; Economics; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.05064117342327562,"score_gpt":0.31757337864074914,"score_spread":0.2669322052174735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1489088844","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22203693,0.008149731,0.013982824,0.03722746,0.00059429446,0.00009720735,0.00006015777,0.000089765104,0.7177615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97541034,0.0004888245,0.0022649842,0.005837901,0.00014537449,0.00003441329,0.000014561947,0.000022972341,0.015780644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.969981,0.015605076,0.0014487026,0.0035367878,0.0052107805,0.0042176037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832087,0.0106963795,0.0019409534,0.001239853,0.0019737226,0.0009402864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031132463,0.00043364285,0.00063942786,0.002683875,0.009511554,0.017307758,0.0020476398,0.012735567,0.0040142033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038578022,0.0007031306,0.0008146584,0.0027786368,0.013881855,0.00706313,0.0060744784,0.0074316394,0.00045662723],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001639594,0.000019047304,0.0006892295,0.000010651779,0.000013972181,0.00022571406,0.0013306391,0.000588914,0.0001226594,0.98766345,0.0027920906,0.00652715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002332299,0.000121160425,0.008877908,0.00041692078,0.000119649325,0.00067770254,0.0039541167,0.010131244,0.0017173088,0.7927595,0.18076141,0.00023000213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025870953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031169392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031132463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014581181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008761993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16464615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579027523","doi":"","title":"Classical Liberalism Meets the New Constitutional Order: A Comment on Mark Tushnet","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitution; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Political science; Judicial review; Sociology","score_opus":0.032503338675555944,"score_gpt":0.28933969375296953,"score_spread":0.2568363550774136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579027523","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013734923,0.006474586,0.00031815597,0.97205216,0.002263908,0.0000073803863,0.000045084536,0.0000145986105,0.017450636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07569375,0.0058202106,0.00066076877,0.87683576,0.01252978,0.00008664994,0.000042679792,0.000062870415,0.028267646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953816,0.0016506034,0.00014309153,0.0009266391,0.0011999396,0.0006981021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991372,0.00710991,0.0002627835,0.0002657457,0.0006579327,0.0003316257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008517289,0.00057987444,0.0011614597,0.0012821131,0.010985089,0.009263937,0.005327501,0.036819723,0.0062225778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013702747,0.00060067174,0.00089134794,0.0022164236,0.032440446,0.014786138,0.0031484293,0.033046484,0.0013996742],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002146832,0.000013196087,0.00010907879,0.000045690755,0.000004625931,0.00017138259,0.0021817652,0.00014870735,0.00004364343,0.7080235,0.285655,0.0035819816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004691551,0.000021378386,0.0006778007,0.00043392833,0.000011961486,0.00013277364,0.002793652,0.000668802,0.0001924699,0.4197858,0.57516694,0.000067646455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10321913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12978633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10321913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015959354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009318346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20523661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1604224115","doi":"","title":"Legal Aspects of the Security-Development Nexus: International Administrative Law as a Check on the Use of Development Assistance in the \"War on Terror\"","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"International law; Political science; Legitimacy; Terrorism; Law; Administrative law; Public administration; Public international law; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.06353154786136958,"score_gpt":0.3278952125751955,"score_spread":0.2643636647138259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1604224115","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021430194,0.0071758484,0.029651912,0.18485676,0.0018090376,0.00014698293,0.000069700895,0.0000902568,0.7547693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90831256,0.003268503,0.012185581,0.044796262,0.0025552195,0.0004822311,0.00006244085,0.000097772754,0.028239435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9769861,0.012192844,0.001086585,0.0022050221,0.0050005983,0.0025288614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97875285,0.014629976,0.0017110993,0.0017725659,0.0020993098,0.0010341287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025168227,0.0005783888,0.0007791612,0.0023546135,0.015930578,0.024049826,0.003089185,0.020929916,0.0033847673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029360188,0.00075933326,0.001149357,0.0024132645,0.11380818,0.02379036,0.009548457,0.021056967,0.0007239674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010039877,0.000003807179,0.00003391425,0.0000027148392,4.4064572e-7,0.000015643707,0.0008813234,0.0000279397,0.000010713063,0.9981425,0.0004994642,0.00038052187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002137359,0.000025470174,0.0004090854,0.00025823413,0.000010490097,0.00009146647,0.003506201,0.00058908464,0.00018024193,0.9147861,0.08008654,0.000035625722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019904597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014948104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025168227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013557283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023743188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1331039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W211475630","doi":"","title":"State Action is Always Present","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social contract; Democracy; Law; Constitution; Law and economics; Political science; State (computer science); Liberal democracy; Tort; Sociology; Politics; Liability","score_opus":0.05852217317198346,"score_gpt":0.3253231613675265,"score_spread":0.26680098819554304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W211475630","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009474849,0.0016919804,0.011180882,0.06899477,0.0023576375,0.000041926145,0.00015889145,0.00019947384,0.9058995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57607716,0.0018707997,0.0047856923,0.026629748,0.0012781706,0.0001891862,0.0002998668,0.0002552245,0.38861418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99463767,0.0016025698,0.00017887585,0.0015322674,0.0010949984,0.00095352833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99735224,0.0008090313,0.00020531268,0.0006116664,0.00055514363,0.00046656255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045079114,0.00042317275,0.0006683742,0.0005881705,0.008178436,0.009438344,0.0012482615,0.0060517024,0.0490119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006758999,0.00039342983,0.00073139986,0.00061330496,0.012477988,0.01083572,0.007207133,0.00882133,0.008984406],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008562396,0.000010261537,0.00021089641,0.00003084919,0.00000678758,0.000095735966,0.0023100926,0.00004648353,0.00013766694,0.9750744,0.013957294,0.008110989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001128577,0.000023831828,0.00036164213,0.0002200009,0.000021448597,0.0001807796,0.002398598,0.00022236971,0.00048157346,0.36675525,0.6292922,0.000031004973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004709193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005962414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0490119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004197675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064409613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16396117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W213016018","doi":"","title":"Who Then Should Judge?: Developing the International Rule of Law under NAFTA Chapter 11","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Investment protection; Bilateral investment treaty; Arbitration; Investment (military); Treaty; International trade; Investor-state dispute settlement; International law; Surprise; State (computer science); Foreign direct investment; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics; International economics; International investment; Sociology","score_opus":0.04689294605375161,"score_gpt":0.26952557013106954,"score_spread":0.22263262407731793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W213016018","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016082842,0.006634639,0.018106122,0.37471992,0.006026129,0.00027195935,0.0001327667,0.00024106239,0.5777845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5348813,0.0075636143,0.03007026,0.23892398,0.004389289,0.0006459019,0.00031036686,0.0002957704,0.18291952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98023707,0.005499247,0.0012645831,0.0032151905,0.006228246,0.003555665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97661245,0.010900858,0.0012210663,0.001073377,0.008796567,0.001395711],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03334638,0.000510865,0.00074493815,0.0015434332,0.010339809,0.024097629,0.0028789723,0.02411998,0.0046088547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05588348,0.0007783623,0.00080187724,0.0008471375,0.016254654,0.014449455,0.0060055368,0.022684159,0.0019488806],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062918184,0.000018409839,0.000401056,0.000028993441,0.0000046000328,0.000180019,0.0031966132,0.00020199314,0.0001329372,0.94590807,0.04171557,0.008205597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031159983,0.00004297872,0.0009957663,0.0009977707,0.000026671463,0.00017019598,0.0053011896,0.0011614813,0.0005724297,0.27570233,0.7148848,0.00011313357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08979373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09759225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08979373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012750691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0411639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1785422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W257037218","doi":"","title":"The Market for Treaties","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Context (archaeology); Political science; International law; Law; Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties; Convention; Business; Public international law; Geography","score_opus":0.012842443035598379,"score_gpt":0.2665454784718698,"score_spread":0.25370303543627143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W257037218","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036480825,0.002111083,0.006686068,0.052565027,0.00039171678,0.000055267687,0.00016503659,0.00018065462,0.90136427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8547999,0.0012775285,0.0022166036,0.017077502,0.00085579907,0.00017225587,0.00023201146,0.0002736614,0.123094685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97806793,0.007012015,0.0005416241,0.002485482,0.009805679,0.0020873586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98210424,0.008487952,0.0028135686,0.0025531861,0.00306758,0.00097337685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008386967,0.00031432766,0.00037810695,0.0019103906,0.006670843,0.017754992,0.001456982,0.0067978697,0.033731543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025292853,0.0004133738,0.00048246415,0.0029776688,0.01221515,0.021146342,0.0061923764,0.006574042,0.0030878156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006695481,0.000016837077,0.0010899807,0.00002107553,0.000004645141,0.00005629244,0.002611863,0.00005780136,0.00016414729,0.9710661,0.013736716,0.011167881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019183928,0.00003387077,0.0028983573,0.00018379085,0.000013938408,0.0000922605,0.005655426,0.00041255448,0.00038367198,0.14358562,0.84668666,0.000034636116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008156558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075819506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033731543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006998276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006289881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.112843275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W263206028","doi":"","title":"Preemption and Law in the Twenty-First Century[dagger]","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; United Nations Charter; Doctrine; National security; Charter; Preemption; Political science; Customary international law; International law; Presumption; Supremacy Clause; Federalism; Public international law; Politics","score_opus":0.013195197954361828,"score_gpt":0.2881807861697503,"score_spread":0.2749855882153885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W263206028","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028930048,0.17155574,0.0015322726,0.098260045,0.007435302,0.00003062351,0.0000752665,0.00006687303,0.71815085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40924662,0.09265952,0.0014137573,0.0983547,0.017011357,0.00024947873,0.00014117855,0.00016239543,0.38076094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998228,0.00076743256,0.000059276073,0.00031202193,0.00035318703,0.00028008784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985512,0.00086941104,0.00012042596,0.000091214126,0.00018674825,0.000180916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022115295,0.00053758145,0.0004618484,0.001733165,0.008566293,0.009704081,0.0015740178,0.007813419,0.008165198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035954642,0.0002922899,0.00037101546,0.0023749638,0.027503693,0.0076822583,0.002908228,0.010346094,0.0016365726],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029658927,0.000011518191,0.000044623324,0.00002955371,9.259696e-7,0.00004077463,0.0019597178,0.000049055245,0.000011281791,0.9498551,0.043626435,0.004368139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061389073,0.000013574675,0.0002130625,0.00041770595,0.00000208226,0.000074848635,0.0010429923,0.00007161176,0.000018741466,0.26967865,0.7284488,0.000011852966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018417135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016358862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018417135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014128795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006355733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10251206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2935025186","doi":"","title":"A Comparative Analysis of the Regulation of State and Provincial Governments in NAFTA and GATT/WTO","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Free trade; International trade law; Trade barrier; International economic law; General Agreement on Trade in Services; Economics; Political science; State (computer science); Comparative advantage; International economics; Liberalization; Position (finance); International free trade agreement; International law; Public international law; Law","score_opus":0.014221932301563166,"score_gpt":0.29935711023021105,"score_spread":0.2851351779286479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2935025186","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.463943,0.0033389248,0.004909676,0.009123279,0.00009052332,0.000118045406,0.00053838023,0.00006333574,0.5178748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880713,0.00087999826,0.0006674959,0.0005300989,0.000010821655,0.00002566999,0.0001345119,0.000012287629,0.009667702],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952421,0.0007882542,0.00012026669,0.00023074883,0.0020074104,0.0016111961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99717677,0.0008514776,0.0004609249,0.00018458697,0.0011283279,0.00019789526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028585165,0.00007996209,0.00022518971,0.0016328326,0.0047099926,0.0043101446,0.00070025487,0.0007727252,0.0022634151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008738305,0.00021214958,0.00036330477,0.0039842413,0.0038931745,0.0008443454,0.001154506,0.0014188226,0.0001345557],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060865084,0.000030082192,0.03215079,0.00011003767,0.000039395465,0.00023498289,0.014585507,0.002402164,0.0011153077,0.9201449,0.0049793385,0.024146656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006402735,0.0001238104,0.40239176,0.00054672745,0.00021117766,0.00037665808,0.037080027,0.0064356374,0.003274891,0.101191185,0.44819617,0.000107837346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7211062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86285925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27889383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03219123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033588734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5610726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992833385","doi":"","title":"Strengthening the Wassenaar Export Control Regime","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"Defense, Military, and Policy Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Summit; Political science; Communism; Cold war; Economic history; Law; International trade; Politics; Business; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.03540545628211968,"score_gpt":0.23001982958849834,"score_spread":0.19461437330637865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2992833385","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07523724,0.0038496358,0.008033811,0.032829333,0.003114588,0.00023075973,0.00034698786,0.00030109688,0.8760566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57645196,0.0035928276,0.0058441786,0.022487618,0.0014021312,0.0003430395,0.00045639055,0.00033163466,0.3890902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915963,0.00136509,0.0006416036,0.0015294466,0.0032045017,0.0016630731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959389,0.0008747339,0.00052375905,0.0007057957,0.0014563467,0.0005003147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010300686,0.000795899,0.00038132354,0.0018488114,0.0045915092,0.009324079,0.00110287,0.0033589161,0.01726921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013033279,0.00048182945,0.00055470667,0.001387347,0.0038507753,0.0047103907,0.006518761,0.006772426,0.0028134785],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016047791,0.00023333814,0.0048161033,0.00022838112,0.000054679273,0.0007730798,0.004721573,0.0015530745,0.003056137,0.8660389,0.053347092,0.06501725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005651424,0.00007946402,0.0037706448,0.0002871511,0.000016876145,0.00009131262,0.00081620325,0.0006735829,0.0012398228,0.015836742,0.9770945,0.000037348862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019718602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018499903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019718602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073808916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014606655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057771325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993411955","doi":"","title":"NAFTA Chapter 11 Meets Chicken Little","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Free trade; Law; Political science; Appeal; Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Globalization; Economics; Politics; International trade","score_opus":0.01766032840991081,"score_gpt":0.23626038052783357,"score_spread":0.21860005211792277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993411955","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026092304,0.009712492,0.0020411487,0.43910837,0.0057294345,0.000036782993,0.00026685157,0.00020013782,0.5168125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37289578,0.0044552977,0.0025136736,0.14446543,0.002029976,0.00009291891,0.00019487333,0.00021610146,0.473136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987638,0.0002453833,0.000044017845,0.00026567228,0.00038187826,0.00029929052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988716,0.000535483,0.00012592896,0.00008735573,0.00026938837,0.00011022135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011979355,0.00024882273,0.00027435657,0.00032036394,0.0057286387,0.004548389,0.00044749645,0.008844316,0.013124972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046701934,0.0002331005,0.00022213493,0.00028992523,0.0034731356,0.0029416378,0.0015369311,0.0052326303,0.0023569784],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006033837,0.000019370718,0.0018191207,0.00013553159,0.000010499284,0.0010390558,0.009068385,0.00010718385,0.0010203624,0.5003096,0.45290852,0.03350203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033146823,0.000010781203,0.0004297935,0.00006001402,0.0000032596818,0.000095520496,0.0012046382,0.000024363684,0.00016674632,0.008404041,0.9895906,0.000006899628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.087071374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1347041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.087071374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040038098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004029819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17312908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994096560","doi":"","title":"The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, NAFTA Chapter 11, and the Doctrine of Indirect Expropriation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Law; Investment (military); Political science; Doctrine; International trade law; International trade; Economics","score_opus":0.016339020963572527,"score_gpt":0.23215312107247016,"score_spread":0.21581410010889762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994096560","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05804966,0.00994054,0.006949944,0.031059887,0.0010195599,0.000043683263,0.00005462174,0.000029257466,0.89285284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9345923,0.0036970128,0.0019151237,0.0075502647,0.0009960135,0.00011985303,0.000059435988,0.000028001556,0.05104197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99526453,0.0016927812,0.00023544261,0.000443887,0.0014283442,0.000935037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99389994,0.0040433155,0.0008195835,0.00032097736,0.00073338323,0.00018278959],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004817606,0.00046038555,0.00041119553,0.0015179745,0.008240235,0.0136382785,0.0018994804,0.008384809,0.0043720147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012202216,0.0004851868,0.0006071279,0.0017432766,0.025134293,0.006788832,0.0052994713,0.011237289,0.0006343485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004163058,0.000006871981,0.00026851718,0.000011532397,0.0000017655424,0.000056497545,0.0017661775,0.00006655191,0.000021736216,0.99425983,0.0019078136,0.0016284698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032819105,0.00006639145,0.003064238,0.00048553105,0.000034805926,0.0003750459,0.0069977045,0.0008156671,0.00039976745,0.7439449,0.2437356,0.00004752001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018403357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02910572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018403357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072046123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007395393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052273333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123770762","doi":"","title":"Environmental Cooperation in the (Partially) Disaggregated State: Lessons from the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prosperity; Political science; Politics; General partnership; Government (linguistics); Foreign policy; Sociology; Public administration; Political economy; Law","score_opus":0.02206280684032421,"score_gpt":0.2779808652757152,"score_spread":0.255918058435391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123770762","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14448848,0.023090158,0.0020452228,0.40204236,0.0009420401,0.000038003265,0.00010251727,0.00003581025,0.42721546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9252855,0.013652894,0.0010203684,0.030970015,0.0002897334,0.00008173553,0.00007824306,0.000028824583,0.028592693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982102,0.0008213346,0.000021777483,0.00014707074,0.0001938847,0.0006058351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985494,0.0005063937,0.0000755195,0.00009716206,0.00019736403,0.0005741614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002984131,0.00018307238,0.00025301956,0.0005443051,0.011750663,0.008391032,0.0008881485,0.0032163253,0.0052699135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018056621,0.0002059864,0.0002674703,0.001266407,0.009697979,0.005692467,0.0084979255,0.00505566,0.00023615292],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003706065,0.000105047875,0.0062372335,0.00018084093,0.000032220905,0.0011167189,0.07869191,0.0017572441,0.00023938733,0.7765895,0.076035246,0.05897755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023247929,0.000044103268,0.015321196,0.0006508702,0.000019694258,0.0001658234,0.11264695,0.0006494821,0.00013061611,0.23313761,0.63716865,0.00004183757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18155418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49625236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98964405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010355937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020581672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36099488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125163359","doi":"","title":"A New Approach to an Old Problem: Managing Fish Resources in the Beaufort Sea","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; Maritime boundary; Arctic; Exclusive economic zone; Fishery; Tragedy of the commons; Natural resource; Geography; Political science; Environmental resource management; Convention; International law; Oceanography; Commons; Law; Environmental science; Geology","score_opus":0.05036104315188384,"score_gpt":0.31140684562137916,"score_spread":0.2610458024694953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125163359","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0057350346,0.0055839834,0.0048002834,0.9012287,0.01150584,0.00005619466,0.00006341696,0.00013981228,0.070886716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13530926,0.008450972,0.006647169,0.7396391,0.01920983,0.00018490877,0.00007990161,0.00031049576,0.090168364],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.991682,0.0027760505,0.00041193797,0.0011053293,0.0027837506,0.0012408328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877001,0.0070638405,0.00070202013,0.00073237234,0.0030838407,0.0007179614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008290222,0.0009795005,0.0008313107,0.0013484803,0.020091832,0.013538573,0.005689332,0.032952774,0.005213795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011833874,0.00045907637,0.001729957,0.001329881,0.024577634,0.012004019,0.0049309265,0.02364312,0.00097461854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053357253,0.000045615776,0.0015315851,0.0003264223,0.000028481069,0.0027523586,0.06258369,0.00085624336,0.0010928446,0.42759904,0.48652914,0.01660115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010405562,0.000028931036,0.0010535438,0.00039698242,0.000017987173,0.00030519505,0.027462555,0.000298111,0.0002471017,0.01933503,0.950757,0.0000871247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23372377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31565464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23372377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012554871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022888016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4647267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W317880880","doi":"","title":"The Normative Cycle of Shaping Judicial Independence in Domestic and International Law: The Mutual Impact of National and International Jurisprudence and Contemporary Practical and Conceptual Challenges","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago journal of international law","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Judicial independence; International law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Judicial activism; Independence (probability theory); Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.0766466413985528,"score_gpt":0.39361136330008134,"score_spread":0.3169647219015285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W317880880","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09067575,0.012271796,0.06521692,0.18156023,0.0011948132,0.0001156197,0.000050670107,0.00009130959,0.6488228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977936,0.0022158083,0.0072382274,0.006327326,0.0004938926,0.00013449621,0.000025580266,0.000070877824,0.005557694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95671463,0.02360256,0.0020796435,0.0038045314,0.010394847,0.0034037705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96060765,0.026056435,0.0025485603,0.0034626273,0.0046753045,0.002649295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043665968,0.00048280047,0.0010830124,0.0030372096,0.016850853,0.02925055,0.0035656656,0.007732801,0.002558313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042111535,0.000840659,0.00062828115,0.0036926933,0.13684945,0.02344056,0.0126059,0.015995638,0.00032519206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015951853,0.0000061274804,0.00010602519,0.000010248718,0.0000014109302,0.00001943619,0.0053443694,0.00008960938,0.000025407246,0.9923265,0.00041087635,0.0016584907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011924921,0.000020127076,0.00077031564,0.00032715005,0.000006962986,0.000107967346,0.015549656,0.0006824598,0.00022246744,0.92762566,0.05463795,0.000037375197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010580433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0148096895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043665968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019363435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025421023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23093045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}