{"meta":{"query_hash":"ba4d420d680e","filters":{"venue":"Chicago-Kent law review"},"cohort_total":15,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":15,"exported":15,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ba4d420d680e","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Chicago-Kent+law+review"},"results":[{"id":"W1123112189","doi":"","title":"Rational Choice and Reasonable Interactions","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Strategic interaction; Simple (philosophy); Rational choice theory (criminology); Rational agent; Game theory; Economics; Law and economics; Positive economics; Management science; Microeconomics; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Neoclassical economics","score_opus":0.04293868435832065,"score_gpt":0.25885866885752434,"score_spread":0.2159199844992037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1123112189","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09170294,0.010724333,0.19589056,0.06328193,0.0002982471,0.00017639506,0.00030158434,0.00013024916,0.6374938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9745662,0.0020548003,0.0100264335,0.0016477617,0.00024947035,0.00013937599,0.000101499674,0.00002578135,0.011188708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928663,0.004426059,0.00019074095,0.00076835026,0.0011456577,0.0006027998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99368036,0.004262759,0.00048063172,0.0007173306,0.000494075,0.00036492108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061890143,0.00045052898,0.000680966,0.0010445074,0.0018399066,0.004961586,0.0009511141,0.0028669802,0.006185736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011219681,0.00021341413,0.0006814139,0.0008943945,0.01160976,0.005072771,0.002121162,0.0027504286,0.0006192506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025953182,0.000004166633,0.00008079321,0.0000069415514,0.000003822136,0.000016780774,0.00008926939,0.0004991701,0.000012144278,0.99796295,0.0004374086,0.0008839769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005063672,0.0000027165472,0.00006602287,0.0000062205277,0.0000015450677,0.000010003483,0.000053267642,0.00059570203,0.000010079903,0.9952714,0.0039766585,0.0000014157625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028230075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018838645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061890143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035670078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020738316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032731056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1276931799","doi":"","title":"Juror Bias, Voir Dire, and the Judge-Jury Relationship","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Impartiality; Jury selection; Law; Political science; Foundation (evidence); Hung jury; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.11028732292088372,"score_gpt":0.34434029241295966,"score_spread":0.23405296949207594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1276931799","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43664238,0.01475993,0.008726223,0.09323504,0.0008021475,0.000116782074,0.000059014437,0.000033033015,0.44562545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878535,0.0016835913,0.00056342257,0.0055182436,0.00014703258,0.000029412153,0.0000050955887,0.0000105863755,0.004189012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9674594,0.02258998,0.0010015591,0.0017007337,0.0047230306,0.0025254125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95066565,0.032788485,0.008263031,0.0018806293,0.0033764276,0.0030258584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02770197,0.00017252484,0.00053636025,0.0014200163,0.0077105695,0.0055005495,0.0010537304,0.0034367742,0.004947533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07760018,0.000340801,0.00023233722,0.001254147,0.02031123,0.0030736204,0.0037353386,0.0040315203,0.00050294277],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072640614,0.00010197971,0.027686745,0.00011944452,0.00006086125,0.00048959826,0.02984606,0.00051440083,0.0003805276,0.9048208,0.005836401,0.030070694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010702053,0.00035744344,0.087618165,0.0011387106,0.00007837604,0.0012255206,0.04948791,0.0010784494,0.0010368311,0.689159,0.1685094,0.00020316058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009263417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01697081,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02770197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004565505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008159439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1465038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1575016584","doi":"","title":"Religious Law, Family Law and Arbitration: Shari'a and Halakha in America","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Gender and Women's Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Law; Political science; Family law; Public law; Private law; Legal pluralism; Comparative law; Legitimacy; Politics; Legal realism","score_opus":0.021103171251352644,"score_gpt":0.28449853258716096,"score_spread":0.2633953613358083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1575016584","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3818537,0.29804897,0.0006664357,0.12711607,0.000832141,0.00003543261,0.00006456775,0.000015345533,0.19136728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9582543,0.024195462,0.00015766818,0.00723412,0.000396595,0.000013640666,0.000013739394,0.000005492815,0.009728906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854726,0.00083047635,0.00004369178,0.00010036605,0.00020714857,0.0002711031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983972,0.0010828597,0.00021116158,0.000041406744,0.00011761456,0.000149854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003211829,0.000110044966,0.00027716075,0.0009923801,0.006693054,0.004124378,0.000707962,0.0040528844,0.0030848312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024952083,0.00021828743,0.00018365003,0.0017072376,0.012550621,0.0026682687,0.002269554,0.002708293,0.000136006],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006185898,0.00017815376,0.010018583,0.000321468,0.000027829345,0.0014830312,0.06708785,0.00030481975,0.00054226746,0.85176,0.017970977,0.05024308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007173082,0.00014674857,0.054180637,0.0012914203,0.000057548357,0.0010184671,0.079241894,0.00039993934,0.0005581819,0.1422459,0.7207225,0.00006511332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0961379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18004382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0961379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007795772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008117829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19115663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1592768569","doi":"","title":"Jury Trials for Violent Hate Crimes in Russia: Is Russian Justice Only for Ethnic Russians","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Verdict; Jury; Section (typography); Law; Political science; Hung jury; Economic Justice; Supreme court; Jury selection; Legislation; Criminology; Sociology; Advertising; Business","score_opus":0.37519597917124564,"score_gpt":0.4795894323707514,"score_spread":0.10439345319950577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1592768569","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9417905,0.004720093,0.0018797244,0.022259701,0.0004387878,0.00014255207,0.00007847452,0.000023968894,0.028666154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961338,0.00086385,0.00054718164,0.0009805867,0.00017664595,0.00004532012,0.000018494433,0.0000049600812,0.0012290272],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9806491,0.0131202,0.0014670137,0.0009239831,0.0023757927,0.0014639264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9603406,0.025207724,0.008412158,0.0011667564,0.0027522193,0.0021205337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024633082,0.00013152903,0.0006899866,0.0010715511,0.0037628016,0.003663933,0.00066095154,0.0030010198,0.0032173267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11187782,0.00024238347,0.00028221673,0.000677496,0.0028146452,0.0019484663,0.0016379132,0.0016590307,0.0007066907],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002804711,0.0007550509,0.41872358,0.0012967665,0.0005276169,0.0030582172,0.06969118,0.002166576,0.0067618294,0.073960155,0.0270404,0.39321375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000508349,0.0016846268,0.7614304,0.0015362262,0.00047773463,0.0013303866,0.08817382,0.0038302601,0.004819977,0.050120864,0.085827745,0.00025959816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00445132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016827974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024633082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012444841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042163744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13027376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595507030","doi":"","title":"Payment Finality and Discharge in Funds Transfers","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Payment; Finance; Actuarial science","score_opus":0.05049957105444494,"score_gpt":0.26258662346517675,"score_spread":0.2120870524107318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595507030","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22247313,0.00278908,0.120022655,0.024271324,0.0010467443,0.0005445025,0.00040828093,0.00035806437,0.6280862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9570828,0.0008831293,0.007339327,0.0024392866,0.000499457,0.00026908633,0.00017531586,0.00007052657,0.031241031],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9756882,0.007937123,0.002468599,0.0026376636,0.0069688596,0.004299598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824853,0.008526959,0.0036142056,0.0020937524,0.0027889716,0.0004906615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009814018,0.00038754797,0.00065491657,0.0021844567,0.0049433466,0.009863161,0.0019010522,0.006048749,0.005885919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043046877,0.00062081096,0.0012037714,0.0018552241,0.013689524,0.009630886,0.007596233,0.0074498286,0.0008373245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003217098,0.000016307658,0.0008821876,0.000028829687,0.000003901023,0.0001212009,0.0010134457,0.0006041043,0.00007864063,0.9895461,0.0015669476,0.0061062085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009818888,0.00018987941,0.0054515754,0.0003605456,0.000037424757,0.00059869216,0.0019378249,0.0051269648,0.0015182206,0.88523567,0.09934131,0.000103808656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006259987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032316335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009863161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006701492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073601794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051902115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1884302434","doi":"","title":"A Tale of Two Countries' Engagement with the Fair Cross Section Right: Aboriginal Underrepresentation on Ontario Juries and the Boston Marathon Bomber's Jury Wheel Challenge","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Section (typography); Law; Political science; Sociology; History; Advertising; Business","score_opus":0.05628836377254533,"score_gpt":0.38336543852948407,"score_spread":0.32707707475693876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1884302434","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21127184,0.009939762,0.0010691086,0.50274193,0.0011920987,0.0000666343,0.00021224274,0.00002538824,0.27348098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8966466,0.0056249956,0.00079329644,0.04142433,0.00042273125,0.00006437345,0.00006917021,0.000038341943,0.05491612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948532,0.0014953574,0.00013969542,0.0003663825,0.0015389236,0.0016064476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99557745,0.0019097682,0.00034270476,0.00019386654,0.0011269083,0.0008493356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050552427,0.0002283686,0.00029842468,0.0012166441,0.037960645,0.009473029,0.0015379128,0.005019835,0.0037543168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011713863,0.00031957476,0.00032645508,0.001965246,0.018803451,0.0027215108,0.0051988913,0.006781923,0.00023336026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000116314994,0.00003337926,0.017092727,0.00012867163,0.00003544769,0.002437946,0.22649729,0.00031099853,0.0007110216,0.6196053,0.1057684,0.027262546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004748217,0.000040461455,0.048224553,0.00043269497,0.000059010014,0.0003145297,0.27269945,0.00030041556,0.0006693796,0.027992278,0.64903605,0.0001836647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9696154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99055684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9696154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08123676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07815112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5894167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1905800883","doi":"","title":"Legal Analysis of Economics: Solving the Problem of Rational Commitment","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Normative; Commit; Rational choice theory (criminology); Adjudication; Rational agent; Positive economics; Law and economics; Economics; Preference; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Computer science; Neoclassical economics; Microeconomics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03694648439122424,"score_gpt":0.23426555743910613,"score_spread":0.19731907304788188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1905800883","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024820887,0.02035613,0.3662077,0.23412186,0.0013692338,0.000087301094,0.000118915435,0.0001751458,0.352743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8893255,0.0126942955,0.06359283,0.010681923,0.0030010254,0.00024084117,0.000095054296,0.00012443803,0.020244109],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916203,0.0051098294,0.0002591328,0.0005385361,0.0020221015,0.00045012598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910644,0.0068927924,0.00041367047,0.00060208363,0.000796306,0.00023075282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007873022,0.00039699484,0.00063655176,0.002325699,0.0035115634,0.0064868894,0.0017714401,0.0045270175,0.003616771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013279254,0.0004557506,0.0006783049,0.0014832697,0.025298914,0.009175793,0.0029872186,0.007000616,0.00042460722],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.4971677e-7,0.0000021386313,0.000013221989,0.000005779676,9.330219e-7,0.0000063067664,0.00006360892,0.00029772823,0.0000069495018,0.9983735,0.0003886365,0.00084071583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018556744,9.0003414e-7,0.000023466035,0.000013083417,9.712849e-7,0.00000464087,0.00005333487,0.000703246,0.000013728588,0.99312913,0.006054051,0.0000015711564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069757495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004126521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007873022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066652833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073757404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04836029},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2405047158","doi":"","title":"Material Contribution to Risk in the Canadian Law of Toxic Torts","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.016997926617679942,"score_gpt":0.2260568465869935,"score_spread":0.20905891996931356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2405047158","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026058594,0.006014724,0.009560768,0.06157811,0.0007271347,0.00020925766,0.00047378227,0.00012257216,0.89525515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8477247,0.005684042,0.011125651,0.025939332,0.000547294,0.00014806773,0.00020227692,0.00009476967,0.108533785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9812347,0.0016053425,0.00056736416,0.0015852462,0.01173438,0.0032729271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99239504,0.002100304,0.00035215679,0.000543163,0.0039714864,0.00063780585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006118042,0.0009224091,0.0008219476,0.0029628105,0.019937765,0.012351965,0.00299443,0.009553063,0.0061754007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016045535,0.0009928624,0.0017060505,0.002577684,0.023088908,0.0038792936,0.004721924,0.009973913,0.00050598825],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009563984,0.0000059381696,0.000599107,0.000028776314,0.000009155298,0.0001543312,0.00094780535,0.00045172605,0.00008808845,0.9873619,0.0068579344,0.003485765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009489209,0.000053347085,0.009764903,0.0007495198,0.00025393328,0.0006199611,0.0018978402,0.0045454847,0.0008726531,0.5210048,0.4597866,0.00035608606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9767754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9804703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.117126636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.117126636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16044343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8498172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2511941400","doi":"","title":"Reforming the Regulation of Political Advocacy by Charities: From Charity under Siege to Charity under Rescue?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Religion, Society, and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Siege; Politics; Political science; Public administration; Law; History","score_opus":0.07102927307355589,"score_gpt":0.350009569758529,"score_spread":0.2789802966849731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2511941400","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04658097,0.038434733,0.00542941,0.78546274,0.0023728341,0.0001513883,0.000047707457,0.00006109645,0.121459164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83507663,0.014503027,0.0027535667,0.13473454,0.0012082515,0.00014070088,0.000030258716,0.000036717214,0.011516342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9734918,0.013655245,0.00072389026,0.0014948624,0.0054023922,0.0052316836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96818215,0.018622408,0.0026237832,0.0017229868,0.0065326863,0.0023160449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033752304,0.00022740473,0.0006203431,0.0021893147,0.008526519,0.011698058,0.0025837168,0.010393732,0.0019259463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044292577,0.0004823621,0.00053507165,0.0017918454,0.029173942,0.0062875985,0.0044154385,0.012664717,0.00035288712],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020472222,0.00006158379,0.0012303375,0.00027570792,0.000019411216,0.00009327457,0.0055601154,0.00038097435,0.00029467058,0.94948596,0.015394995,0.027182467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022211872,0.0001743769,0.012473999,0.0026205773,0.00010710467,0.00021941272,0.018215219,0.001001957,0.0013176407,0.24179052,0.7217271,0.00013000838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1830442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22560196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1830442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031645212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07332842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36395752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907518675","doi":"","title":"A Canadian Lens on Third Party Litigation Funding in the American Bankruptcy Context","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Context (archaeology); Through-the-lens metering; Business; Lens (geology); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics; History; Optics","score_opus":0.04734319766364592,"score_gpt":0.26419715750812983,"score_spread":0.2168539598444839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2907518675","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008063767,0.010518856,0.004452159,0.10525537,0.0007939261,0.000068956186,0.00028092903,0.00006920429,0.8704968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7283759,0.030388925,0.011403189,0.060280014,0.0017478268,0.0003536151,0.00028098628,0.00017964248,0.16698998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934336,0.0012963593,0.00016004963,0.0005584571,0.0027283335,0.0018232499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952669,0.0018549018,0.00032326512,0.00020118865,0.0016513508,0.00070236076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003953689,0.0011307579,0.00074673176,0.008543167,0.026499005,0.021722322,0.0027057647,0.007572825,0.013511109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069643725,0.00054691755,0.0009755577,0.009787036,0.033647813,0.008521594,0.004984769,0.010302809,0.000883444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026403782,0.0000033811748,0.00015972926,0.000011533424,9.239247e-7,0.00004122942,0.0017967452,0.000060660976,0.00002530412,0.9893841,0.0063483645,0.0021652991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018030885,0.000019397057,0.003232276,0.00054622634,0.000023835659,0.00021465232,0.008719941,0.00069502834,0.00018386592,0.18832117,0.79792476,0.00010078712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96565765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97433156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14402042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14402042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1249458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99281496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125006201","doi":"","title":"The Role of Innocence Commissions: Error Discovery, Systemic Reform or Both?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.043783397454053255,"score_gpt":0.37561667039468327,"score_spread":0.33183327294063003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125006201","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17607814,0.023087384,0.097523145,0.36271912,0.0021989662,0.0007038822,0.0001619332,0.00040854374,0.33711895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9647433,0.0019838342,0.01201255,0.010562368,0.00082240626,0.00018927378,0.000031423242,0.000048751215,0.009606168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.92456615,0.0364088,0.0035326306,0.008126247,0.017908912,0.009457255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8305258,0.09036298,0.023822883,0.029071424,0.019123645,0.007093234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07523925,0.00039291673,0.0010778444,0.0033870752,0.005578994,0.019407947,0.002808088,0.006030823,0.0033598598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16029155,0.00058306364,0.00069043325,0.0034631551,0.040519647,0.019879516,0.009086433,0.007065304,0.0006386948],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029221961,0.000041053023,0.0050678374,0.00011927866,0.000030346968,0.00010378409,0.0057803653,0.0007661808,0.0001321883,0.93383217,0.0046429904,0.049454525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011665939,0.00013571627,0.011246475,0.00090073096,0.00009308013,0.00024198012,0.010219588,0.002533683,0.0011732571,0.8524459,0.120752916,0.0001400268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009732735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009374054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07523925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012476351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025958974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3979079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125242676","doi":"","title":"COMMON KNOWLEDGE, COMMUNICATION, AND PUBLIC REASON","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Appeal; Silence; Metaphor; Law; Framing (construction); Set (abstract data type); Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Engineering; Philosophy; Linguistics; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.0377908360445267,"score_gpt":0.33940330779469574,"score_spread":0.30161247175016903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125242676","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025525142,0.03764456,0.09658841,0.122488126,0.0007416309,0.00009189989,0.00010641417,0.00013226391,0.7166816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9579063,0.010597,0.0072616693,0.0064476957,0.00088086526,0.00017157703,0.00005939249,0.000044134562,0.016631404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99201703,0.0047568423,0.0002664037,0.00075205165,0.0013187643,0.0008888422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908109,0.006519092,0.00075174426,0.00086855434,0.0006823804,0.0003673892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0102598155,0.00045169584,0.00066738855,0.0022869448,0.004595198,0.008635295,0.0014372761,0.0051387167,0.0063124048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011420745,0.0003278861,0.00065056875,0.0019706348,0.034661494,0.013286153,0.0042729164,0.0044780183,0.0006588506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013415801,0.0000022992292,0.000036684665,0.000011080859,0.0000018521629,0.000014687203,0.0002973024,0.000103882856,0.000007137548,0.9978188,0.0004951016,0.0012098762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004538292,0.0000054917737,0.000114748946,0.000055209945,0.000003924172,0.000033634486,0.00054465065,0.00021210668,0.000035939778,0.97087777,0.028106881,0.0000050805425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006408942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044121277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0102598155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007508715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054163113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054479778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6980400367","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Criminal Jury","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Publicity; Jury selection; Criminal trial; Hung jury; Verdict; Fair trial; Ethnic group","score_opus":0.13326510903697655,"score_gpt":0.37013352723093185,"score_spread":0.2368684181939553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6980400367","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050277553,0.024918146,0.0037165773,0.07447578,0.0034632052,0.00069378206,0.0028546317,0.00026364834,0.8393368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61631435,0.029415455,0.011731854,0.020447161,0.0010976935,0.00062704156,0.0022113188,0.00017120574,0.31798393],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99006736,0.0012336582,0.0003569419,0.0008979391,0.005736029,0.001708129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873875,0.0011045955,0.00036029055,0.00030626843,0.008525451,0.002315951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005850601,0.00052064034,0.0005607701,0.005443851,0.017230185,0.0061822576,0.0023323095,0.0025194043,0.021541765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023605326,0.0005321527,0.0006429526,0.003725432,0.002977107,0.0012972474,0.0032526413,0.0023447236,0.0025733807],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016043821,0.000061116094,0.01770388,0.0004293377,0.000054039847,0.0006269216,0.004652765,0.00080726465,0.00067510305,0.16113433,0.55348605,0.26020885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047176814,0.000054568256,0.047711354,0.0005349988,0.0000664438,0.0003014242,0.0035925673,0.000497694,0.000385818,0.007402417,0.9392688,0.00013674595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9639035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9863464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07435142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07435142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17594604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5394598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7046159894","doi":"","title":"A Comparative Law Analysis of Private Securities Litigation in the Wake of <em>Morrison v. National Australia Bank</em>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Magnetic confinement fusion research","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Subpoena; Pretext; TSG101; Hyporeflexia; Liquation; Gestational period","score_opus":0.052278954625440875,"score_gpt":0.33845760269501324,"score_spread":0.2861786480695724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7046159894","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43651307,0.020120213,0.0014880736,0.015100184,0.00027589852,0.0001302948,0.00036634336,0.000030510842,0.52597547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9713775,0.0065453174,0.0005373941,0.0042255837,0.00026460178,0.00008123595,0.00019044236,0.000015981623,0.01676195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99410856,0.0020279782,0.00021876403,0.0004995205,0.0019083021,0.0012368446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98993903,0.006720426,0.0011821127,0.00036473895,0.0013523242,0.0004413672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005655351,0.00017248404,0.0005093922,0.00472572,0.0048416425,0.0057975473,0.0012271724,0.0042146915,0.0062265215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011646428,0.00032494136,0.0007295773,0.0034875234,0.0053335335,0.0049768426,0.0018776575,0.0031173117,0.0004502083],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001604316,0.00030054973,0.0077345213,0.0002635602,0.00008241584,0.0016387034,0.009177499,0.00097185525,0.0013367981,0.93905073,0.012823505,0.026459312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004077801,0.0021036572,0.29219106,0.0017280917,0.0007695589,0.003004579,0.04934809,0.0069771972,0.0057377177,0.2478355,0.38957012,0.00032660508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058670744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.111115046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058670744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011008269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005422786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11665851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W86687610","doi":"","title":"Human Trafficking for Sexual Exploitation at World Sporting Events","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human trafficking; Sex trafficking; Criminology; Medical emergency; Political science; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.04979314054031645,"score_gpt":0.3720240743836732,"score_spread":0.3222309338433567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W86687610","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034934852,0.12473799,0.0005819133,0.10167656,0.0023132027,0.000322823,0.00045116208,0.000046860296,0.7349346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45570967,0.217739,0.00045179145,0.09872214,0.0026405128,0.00049230433,0.00032241674,0.000041105588,0.22388108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99529463,0.0015534468,0.00026378024,0.0003588978,0.0012807518,0.0012484653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950729,0.002389897,0.0005034381,0.00017292784,0.0014444316,0.00041633088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004213993,0.00035556706,0.00039645273,0.0026980196,0.00931678,0.0065549463,0.0010326073,0.008517204,0.008961055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006667254,0.00054372795,0.00063087925,0.0019434672,0.0055082478,0.0025780592,0.0016283186,0.0034731238,0.001249247],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038029975,0.0002769835,0.01540466,0.0014730144,0.00008145599,0.001766441,0.008538978,0.00086058927,0.0005990808,0.49373633,0.39849034,0.078733996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002550668,0.000094555486,0.024037916,0.0019083538,0.00005463519,0.0002848241,0.007471781,0.000098593984,0.0002171014,0.0088012945,0.9569574,0.00004806957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28022635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40130106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28022635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00750718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026510287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55719054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}