{"meta":{"query_hash":"ba4d420d680e","filters":{"venue":"Chicago-Kent law review"},"cohort_total":15,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":15,"exported":15,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ba4d420d680e","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Chicago-Kent+law+review"},"results":[{"id":"W1123112189","doi":"","title":"Rational Choice and Reasonable Interactions","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Strategic interaction; Simple (philosophy); Rational choice theory (criminology); Rational agent; Game theory; Economics; Law and economics; Positive economics; Management science; Microeconomics; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Neoclassical economics","score_opus":0.04293868435832065,"score_gpt":0.25885866885752434,"score_spread":0.2159199844992037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1123112189","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015552846,0.52102494,0.0002270449,0.033878524,0.0002618887,0.00027942946,0.00008432802,0.00004030181,0.44264823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73752487,0.22454134,0.0013183847,0.025954861,0.0009115684,0.00021272883,0.00007378613,0.000018885778,0.009443572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992842,0.000007890832,0.00033315798,0.00022163636,0.00002981331,0.0001232804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963635,0.00004676433,0.00011164924,0.0001225048,0.000027395203,0.00005533923],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016690633,0.00009432243,0.00025573815,0.000020838963,0.00021021266,0.00003660015,0.000076532706,0.000020506746,0.001115413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000082927785,0.00008858083,0.00007368449,0.000091205104,0.00009146752,0.0002694692,0.000053413056,0.00010363968,0.0010950887],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.6921206e-7,0.000037942576,0.0015044841,0.00012559179,0.00002722446,2.6352095e-7,0.000008304,0.0000020532989,0.0000010726984,0.9872268,0.008759305,0.0023063042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011715734,0.000007005669,0.003997814,0.0002529823,0.000010660439,0.000010156173,9.3627676e-7,0.00004169981,0.0000032201444,0.005368181,0.9900801,0.00011006801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016130864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017608424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9818586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049986687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011416883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1276931799","doi":"","title":"Juror Bias, Voir Dire, and the Judge-Jury Relationship","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Impartiality; Jury selection; Law; Political science; Foundation (evidence); Hung jury; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.11028732292088372,"score_gpt":0.34434029241295966,"score_spread":0.23405296949207594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1276931799","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013033316,0.5185087,0.000008191668,0.08931511,0.0005085605,0.0010562799,0.000010586692,0.00013012836,0.38915914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2666685,0.6535591,0.00042898208,0.054483604,0.001322967,0.0002710004,0.000044166212,0.000038737973,0.02318297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802107,0.00079187483,0.00027659643,0.0002268574,0.00044302703,0.00024054994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988689,0.00036191446,0.00013703556,0.0003073999,0.00011770698,0.00020703499],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003056853,0.00013175939,0.00030344081,0.000001952227,0.0009078791,0.00009855494,0.00032265246,0.00012848682,0.00012810522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001146035,0.0000750761,0.00016962076,0.00032033835,0.001208841,0.00018836015,0.00007684164,0.00030049245,0.00018487743],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003959483,0.000018304341,0.00026819616,0.00015476916,0.0000146269895,8.6034794e-7,0.0031097408,1.052836e-7,1.2753028e-7,0.8912187,0.10245263,0.0027579588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003285001,0.000007981516,0.0003667252,0.0004977656,0.00010082761,0.0000023431605,0.00039681685,8.888994e-7,7.380752e-7,0.02098687,0.9771941,0.0001164685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018054483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003586819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87474144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005034852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000117550815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6982764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1575016584","doi":"","title":"Religious Law, Family Law and Arbitration: Shari'a and Halakha in America","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Gender and Women's Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Law; Political science; Family law; Public law; Private law; Legal pluralism; Comparative law; Legitimacy; Politics; Legal realism","score_opus":0.021103171251352644,"score_gpt":0.28449853258716096,"score_spread":0.2633953613358083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1575016584","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017046314,0.1781807,0.000011261667,0.013524527,0.00020811752,0.0016514249,0.0000069633934,0.00010320308,0.7892675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75093806,0.20734476,0.00023250679,0.040947277,0.00011978945,0.00013075322,0.000010235286,0.000014025111,0.0002626219],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984495,0.00021309292,0.0003467647,0.00037113653,0.00027939587,0.00034009604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999319,0.00007553395,0.000090868874,0.00023798447,0.000056589513,0.00022000061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038244494,0.00017011263,0.00039579155,0.000020327281,0.00038071364,0.00016166618,0.00017764568,0.0000840522,0.00018148296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022987657,0.00013349313,0.000056939367,0.00021895392,0.00065240485,0.00028617278,0.00006117813,0.00018214804,0.00016030455],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015236805,0.000051616986,0.00019055596,0.0004497392,0.000012972912,0.0000074648938,0.0021888183,1.2327207e-7,0.00003270127,0.99047047,0.004271569,0.0023224438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018936349,0.000037200367,0.0006477379,0.0006347667,0.000027057182,0.000003770533,0.00020049194,0.0000040257787,0.000007816485,0.032882847,0.9651536,0.0002113482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011012488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055379556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.960882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003762016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004513853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1592768569","doi":"","title":"Jury Trials for Violent Hate Crimes in Russia: Is Russian Justice Only for Ethnic Russians","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Verdict; Jury; Section (typography); Law; Political science; Hung jury; Economic Justice; Supreme court; Jury selection; Legislation; Criminology; Sociology; Advertising; Business","score_opus":0.37519597917124564,"score_gpt":0.4795894323707514,"score_spread":0.10439345319950577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1592768569","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014482734,0.69506013,0.008920206,0.043358788,0.005411298,0.022577131,0.0006414088,0.0006819915,0.22190079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17008476,0.71276325,0.034410704,0.06852058,0.0026302557,0.0050573447,0.000112271104,0.0003371674,0.006083694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951722,0.00079840777,0.0016977941,0.00082431216,0.0006184238,0.0008888816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963236,0.0017209442,0.0007910425,0.0006713824,0.00018498342,0.0003080625],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0087821,0.00041032294,0.0015471793,0.00013318298,0.00062306045,0.00011310927,0.0010561579,0.00030073457,0.0009007914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004118957,0.00032016556,0.00070464564,0.0006972225,0.00033909417,0.00038313502,0.00010618767,0.00028941283,0.00016628683],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012493425,0.0002832848,0.000017562532,0.004903318,0.000060961527,0.000005287484,0.0028906562,2.9297442e-7,0.000006280468,0.79701215,0.016476134,0.17821914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008582442,0.00014822654,0.00062012754,0.0065508257,0.0007801723,0.0000027709184,0.00027969666,0.0000042551583,0.00014457872,0.03832176,0.95182514,0.00046421005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002984573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014730118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.935349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015660442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007148889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595507030","doi":"","title":"Payment Finality and Discharge in Funds Transfers","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Payment; Finance; Actuarial science","score_opus":0.05049957105444494,"score_gpt":0.26258662346517675,"score_spread":0.2120870524107318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595507030","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33556345,0.22360791,0.0005742375,0.016832823,0.0005552394,0.0014231958,0.00030021358,0.00007337138,0.42106956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97212076,0.02086067,0.00005871574,0.006669835,0.000084545674,0.000028120645,0.000020043837,0.00001772303,0.00013960253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818385,0.0000190903,0.0009312833,0.0004269868,0.000027328599,0.0004114525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933434,0.00006610498,0.0001397725,0.00029980476,0.000005354428,0.00015462158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016697351,0.00018426754,0.00062495546,0.000073041876,0.000068499714,0.00002804522,0.00016809128,0.00008336368,0.00030099103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005042116,0.00018613464,0.0001384546,0.00016073641,0.00010172843,0.00016792859,0.00004348583,0.00020626892,0.00025195398],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009151803,0.00008904766,0.022029603,0.0011332176,0.000018194529,0.0000032399228,0.00009273069,2.679358e-7,0.0000027307715,0.9730153,0.0005645837,0.0030419105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008993733,0.00009940741,0.17187296,0.00087815383,0.000018537685,0.000009939326,0.000012154662,0.00004546896,0.00004450136,0.09624242,0.72934633,0.00053075765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034915173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029723725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8767729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009001054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000066117123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.759035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1884302434","doi":"","title":"A Tale of Two Countries' Engagement with the Fair Cross Section Right: Aboriginal Underrepresentation on Ontario Juries and the Boston Marathon Bomber's Jury Wheel Challenge","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Section (typography); Law; Political science; Sociology; History; Advertising; Business","score_opus":0.05628836377254533,"score_gpt":0.38336543852948407,"score_spread":0.32707707475693876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1884302434","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44306633,0.12984847,0.0003234111,0.14869292,0.0018105044,0.00666104,0.000030317173,0.00017041684,0.2693966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9681096,0.028460516,0.00003839067,0.0015301264,0.00025464126,0.00014161719,0.000008005303,0.000011702484,0.001445409],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977588,0.00065504224,0.000297154,0.00029416918,0.00075700984,0.00023781437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880856,0.0002864578,0.00026061793,0.00034035143,0.00020441666,0.000099571844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029780793,0.00017395431,0.00032494828,0.000016038222,0.0008528692,0.00015998592,0.00026007774,0.00004951339,0.00011017139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005477955,0.00008925348,0.00008089747,0.0001559556,0.0014391348,0.0003363087,0.000048236405,0.0002986339,0.000017701619],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032464231,0.000092540744,0.00059060653,0.0005302153,0.0000476495,0.0000064606916,0.022894751,0.000016202184,0.0000016013665,0.96944785,0.0049075866,0.0011398621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007373713,0.00019382425,0.0012061371,0.0010338065,0.000183078,0.0000062902313,0.0010098098,0.0000040181817,0.000024912737,0.002349122,0.99311477,0.00013685813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048753638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.291345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98820716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020766917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036291522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9575808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1905800883","doi":"","title":"Legal Analysis of Economics: Solving the Problem of Rational Commitment","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Normative; Commit; Rational choice theory (criminology); Adjudication; Rational agent; Positive economics; Law and economics; Economics; Preference; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Computer science; Neoclassical economics; Microeconomics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03694648439122424,"score_gpt":0.23426555743910613,"score_spread":0.19731907304788188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1905800883","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0400176,0.6021196,0.0019179182,0.02691048,0.00029434904,0.0016811461,0.00090049906,0.00003242508,0.32612595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9537252,0.043874357,0.0006483215,0.0015237292,0.000039084753,0.0000611078,0.000041472817,0.0000054494944,0.00008123232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879974,0.000013178231,0.00083248975,0.00019939119,0.000035644058,0.0001195661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991493,0.00004523142,0.00049401674,0.00023263943,0.000050270697,0.000028504292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004622879,0.0001094215,0.00064653554,0.000059426635,0.00012629287,0.000016337615,0.00021538671,0.000026278347,0.00022921972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017662924,0.000082430066,0.00037107573,0.00030557127,0.00022565454,0.00011292316,0.000077570985,0.00007610568,0.000045928515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021409016,0.000077739795,0.0012469749,0.00022920078,0.0007091568,2.0918527e-7,0.00003552261,0.0011250707,0.0000016921472,0.99616116,0.00011279484,0.00029835163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039801287,0.000049112434,0.0058663688,0.0005149152,0.00051316625,0.0000019712916,0.000011329297,0.00012591307,0.00009006458,0.06141085,0.9308075,0.00021079545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007886091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039527676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9347503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008344439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043834505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33614007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2405047158","doi":"","title":"Material Contribution to Risk in the Canadian Law of Toxic Torts","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.016997926617679942,"score_gpt":0.2260568465869935,"score_spread":0.20905891996931356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2405047158","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8583341,0.007041987,0.000035057277,0.023667602,0.0018724353,0.0046197576,0.000187785,0.000117426825,0.10412381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98791087,0.0006897142,0.0000056222043,0.010716116,0.0005168703,0.000048370173,0.00003796355,0.000011271131,0.00006319832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887335,0.000045274126,0.00038837758,0.00021204409,0.00020453335,0.00027643988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925435,0.000027135116,0.00020749714,0.00037066234,0.000110219364,0.0000301404],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074638124,0.0001464019,0.00031683123,0.000055364686,0.00020205784,0.00010972523,0.00031078115,0.00005001779,0.0009720661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003019891,0.00007548246,0.00008435504,0.00020414827,0.00007842777,0.00028934976,0.000055440487,0.00006869858,0.00040249267],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008363927,0.000023366265,0.00039837748,0.0003359512,0.0000062313857,0.0000085745905,0.0000064722335,1.2135953e-7,0.00006664084,0.99500114,0.0029233398,0.0012214202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023500565,0.000010800194,0.0033840155,0.0016731662,0.00006203549,0.0000012612336,9.630284e-7,6.9398067e-7,0.00008455479,0.026279356,0.968127,0.00014114396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09384614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69095117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9687218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006864412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003237453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2511941400","doi":"","title":"Reforming the Regulation of Political Advocacy by Charities: From Charity under Siege to Charity under Rescue?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Religion, Society, and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Siege; Politics; Political science; Public administration; Law; History","score_opus":0.07102927307355589,"score_gpt":0.350009569758529,"score_spread":0.2789802966849731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2511941400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46214476,0.29838035,0.0013982218,0.16382857,0.002202601,0.0050006714,0.00016379968,0.00036033092,0.06652069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9237604,0.061152477,0.00027345092,0.014088813,0.0003302855,0.000063935535,0.00007083748,0.000019686157,0.0002401032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967951,0.0004618926,0.00067930814,0.0004206406,0.001066602,0.00057642366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827033,0.00020083145,0.00017460487,0.0005506769,0.00031557586,0.0004879799],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024491146,0.00022203072,0.00051577075,0.000021589245,0.00055541995,0.000067410125,0.0005703039,0.00018374796,0.00019115295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038415028,0.00015745765,0.00020701415,0.0004043421,0.00054332346,0.00022961207,0.00017337012,0.00026121837,0.00009148273],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012183176,0.00014058349,0.00016469858,0.00035936933,0.000058351434,5.101058e-7,0.02947406,0.000002204957,0.00009116968,0.90425164,0.064966634,0.0004786125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006847952,0.00010276612,0.020114474,0.0038894203,0.0001934715,0.0000028145848,0.040060226,0.000018671559,0.00040388203,0.21065003,0.7230885,0.0007909339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06912979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001841483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6936016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005442746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053027435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93706894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907518675","doi":"","title":"A Canadian Lens on Third Party Litigation Funding in the American Bankruptcy Context","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Context (archaeology); Through-the-lens metering; Business; Lens (geology); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics; History; Optics","score_opus":0.04734319766364592,"score_gpt":0.26419715750812983,"score_spread":0.2168539598444839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2907518675","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42426413,0.025186636,0.000029096438,0.1164478,0.0013711719,0.0027893404,0.000038449325,0.00017753805,0.4296958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8795594,0.0029855196,0.000006549631,0.116516426,0.0007626236,0.000052498614,0.000026183381,0.0000138468295,0.00007695105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986786,0.000047688805,0.0003443755,0.00029602824,0.00025272174,0.00038056917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904567,0.000058941332,0.00037459665,0.0004061401,0.00009041373,0.00002424055],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007725306,0.00018620651,0.00031224173,0.000066169116,0.00028123133,0.0001569697,0.00036788028,0.00003031376,0.00019815816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015502416,0.0001301026,0.000098215605,0.0007596886,0.00016972669,0.00046775193,0.00003936297,0.00021814865,0.00094305945],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019681296,0.00008127341,0.0089797,0.0009766135,0.000016316024,0.000032273336,0.000116960524,0.0000010858427,0.0000139051235,0.89120823,0.061487213,0.037066724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012429408,0.000028017568,0.01784154,0.0025119146,0.00003150371,0.0000019256718,0.00003748696,0.000051720905,0.0000057758602,0.0018761004,0.9773074,0.00018231776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1336933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4568601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9158202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000106564425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005751101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125006201","doi":"","title":"The Role of Innocence Commissions: Error Discovery, Systemic Reform or Both?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.043783397454053255,"score_gpt":0.37561667039468327,"score_spread":0.33183327294063003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125006201","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026216686,0.7483419,0.0000763703,0.020570284,0.0005198785,0.0019823262,0.00002278011,0.00019182746,0.22567293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74848074,0.24608585,0.00019207034,0.002544373,0.00011569628,0.000038886334,0.0000031546035,0.000013837048,0.0025254001],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974945,0.0003291701,0.0007358071,0.00028624208,0.000787753,0.00036648175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981244,0.00040992035,0.00045701224,0.0006871659,0.00018975395,0.00013174278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019434834,0.00017512208,0.00047741825,0.00002560526,0.0008418996,0.00013681976,0.0012103253,0.00008612949,0.00011084846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012515667,0.00009044866,0.0001465189,0.0007494832,0.0003945657,0.00037807378,0.000104135346,0.00021286563,0.000065489425],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031426214,0.00009604719,0.000046145455,0.00075247505,0.000014816463,0.0000032063936,0.0005088399,6.636568e-7,0.000078699195,0.8237155,0.003261292,0.1714909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082240134,0.00006399786,0.00014368304,0.009628162,0.000041493076,0.000009779631,0.0006614178,0.0000023098391,0.00008532346,0.009933022,0.97919935,0.0001492285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022521184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044245212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.975938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001464794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033997232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6475296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125242676","doi":"","title":"COMMON KNOWLEDGE, COMMUNICATION, AND PUBLIC REASON","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Appeal; Silence; Metaphor; Law; Framing (construction); Set (abstract data type); Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Engineering; Philosophy; Linguistics; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.0377908360445267,"score_gpt":0.33940330779469574,"score_spread":0.30161247175016903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125242676","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014009987,0.62647593,0.0000039718116,0.04724168,0.00009707405,0.0004630152,0.000003896917,0.00011253547,0.32420087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19352561,0.7997965,0.00032188735,0.0052392827,0.00012435786,0.0000567575,0.00003072115,0.000011337887,0.00089353474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986871,0.0003686254,0.0002492163,0.00020184976,0.00022921276,0.0002640062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902815,0.00007303354,0.00011014138,0.0004488115,0.00014014784,0.00019974346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095488224,0.00012383761,0.00028464128,0.000002480381,0.0011622638,0.00011698482,0.00046988498,0.00013050943,0.0002531843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014988973,0.00010005286,0.000114863826,0.00033574138,0.0007601226,0.00025715126,0.000118639495,0.00025637064,0.00013500432],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.1703584e-7,0.000096571304,0.00010542305,0.00032204262,0.000014330003,3.9308304e-7,0.0026417484,6.047281e-8,0.0000014332461,0.9787382,0.011266068,0.006813315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001644836,0.000009854348,0.0001197125,0.0016100837,0.000040957115,0.0000026933496,0.00045419662,1.2490476e-7,0.000004769487,0.017829267,0.9796298,0.00013405661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00061001664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00615872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9683637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001036119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011097673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89393115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6980400367","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Criminal Jury","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Publicity; Jury selection; Criminal trial; Hung jury; Verdict; Fair trial; Ethnic group","score_opus":0.13326510903697655,"score_gpt":0.37013352723093185,"score_spread":0.2368684181939553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6980400367","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039605726,0.13540502,0.00001025883,0.009245677,0.0007559271,0.00055158185,0.000005182884,0.00008222061,0.85354805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71558684,0.24880052,0.0007808103,0.028660892,0.000515911,0.00013128643,0.0000054419097,0.000043754957,0.0054745562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822134,0.00025589898,0.00030680688,0.00023947627,0.00049172755,0.00048474912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987352,0.00017368043,0.000114205024,0.00043266054,0.00018433301,0.00035991002],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018675986,0.00012508273,0.00020962178,0.000025957383,0.0020500466,0.00013422035,0.00088689657,0.00007593254,0.0013798776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00075008423,0.00008218773,0.00011304009,0.00033654427,0.0005565183,0.00013736868,0.000054275944,0.00020746661,0.0009876308],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018552471,0.000013118342,0.000045193836,0.0001665497,0.000007986895,0.000009681725,0.00087691756,1.12765095e-8,1.7998514e-7,0.85200536,0.021699939,0.12517318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027232169,0.000012086373,0.0009354834,0.0006441033,0.000051447652,0.0000030388364,0.000092592614,1.1895667e-7,0.0000053599533,0.007486093,0.9906247,0.00011774494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09625094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7418996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96892476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013098384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007980331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7046159894","doi":"","title":"A Comparative Law Analysis of Private Securities Litigation in the Wake of <em>Morrison v. National Australia Bank</em>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Magnetic confinement fusion research","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Subpoena; Pretext; TSG101; Hyporeflexia; Liquation; Gestational period","score_opus":0.052278954625440875,"score_gpt":0.33845760269501324,"score_spread":0.2861786480695724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7046159894","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8080695,0.020939257,0.00015880741,0.0022494658,0.00013155123,0.003053366,0.0005785346,0.000020227713,0.16479926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99792266,0.0006482478,0.00015682695,0.00022886493,0.00008363555,0.00018437741,0.00038205853,0.0000069406374,0.00038640504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973042,0.0004282007,0.00083085574,0.00022636728,0.0008987601,0.00031161035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861133,0.00024249821,0.00038787222,0.0003858861,0.00028889475,0.00008351816],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013549051,0.0002053012,0.0007324464,0.00012369471,0.00008051991,0.000035738205,0.00037052933,0.000040970895,0.03350173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021093161,0.00015064521,0.00031140578,0.000939123,0.00019876537,0.00008322561,0.0001033911,0.00021280524,0.00003389602],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009794522,0.0005017741,0.004017074,0.0009425763,0.00038009687,2.7863183e-7,0.001336864,0.0000136573435,0.0008670914,0.9850905,0.003910676,0.0029296167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009938665,0.0001651029,0.0922005,0.0027713298,0.0014162037,8.990773e-7,0.00060456723,0.00086976815,0.0027734593,0.0025863287,0.8950993,0.0005186883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046223443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007638365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9825042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018039533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004731902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9673818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W86687610","doi":"","title":"Human Trafficking for Sexual Exploitation at World Sporting Events","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human trafficking; Sex trafficking; Criminology; Medical emergency; Political science; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.04979314054031645,"score_gpt":0.3720240743836732,"score_spread":0.3222309338433567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W86687610","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89770955,0.040895328,0.000021875208,0.0048979963,0.002075582,0.0024345214,0.0000033694419,0.00036043115,0.051601373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97960997,0.0062400447,0.0005979607,0.0016317825,0.0009771907,0.00015190218,0.00006409052,0.000038907314,0.010688133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843884,0.000102562335,0.00046307567,0.0003034938,0.00032472194,0.00036729765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916476,0.00010933096,0.00027832072,0.00021586065,0.00008992309,0.00014181751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013998984,0.00014534954,0.00030756084,0.000030701536,0.0012105847,0.00004146483,0.0002544042,0.00010960331,0.0006929307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020979115,0.00012404287,0.00014052485,0.0002945126,0.0001408163,0.0001493783,0.000037425012,0.0002627883,0.000092744835],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030632717,0.00070232456,0.007663646,0.0057288143,0.00028290102,0.000019297098,0.045199588,0.000021472602,0.0053273784,0.67104334,0.041860737,0.22211985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019516975,0.000023545088,0.0004396912,0.001399843,0.0000938346,9.644288e-7,0.00048763183,0.000005234177,0.00008604137,0.0009195064,0.99614054,0.00020800262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016572073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003977272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9542798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057633588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034240304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9310961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}