{"meta":{"query_hash":"1d9e40e526fc","filters":{"venue":"Chinese Journal of International Law"},"cohort_total":10,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":10,"exported":10,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/1d9e40e526fc","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Chinese+Journal+of+International+Law"},"results":[{"id":"W2026551504","doi":"10.1093/chinesejil/jml033","title":"Towards World Constitutionalism","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chinese Journal of International Law","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Dignity; International law; Political science; Law; World order; Order (exchange); TRACE (psycholinguistics); Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.010065151977422335,"score_gpt":0.30910665861180314,"score_spread":0.2990415066343808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026551504","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007201299,0.009595163,0.018803257,0.13646206,0.001997803,0.00004963281,0.00013484227,0.00011816499,0.8256378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7494947,0.008634021,0.02598756,0.048088145,0.0032249196,0.00042781158,0.0003030475,0.000379546,0.1634603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99446493,0.0031831749,0.00013194169,0.0006725514,0.0008327711,0.0007146182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971559,0.001283074,0.00018471113,0.0005804804,0.00041765324,0.0003780835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009997129,0.0004681752,0.00049811666,0.0021404498,0.009225435,0.015766133,0.0012493773,0.0047618253,0.006771656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009031633,0.0003065349,0.00054976024,0.0014725955,0.032576203,0.013664584,0.0060041677,0.011293205,0.0012000586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.8227685e-7,0.0000012327403,0.0000125537135,0.0000022541442,2.5537648e-7,0.000003600845,0.00060879614,0.000020844735,0.0000065996583,0.99653363,0.0020906413,0.0007191482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027443084,0.0000025164272,0.000058770376,0.00003980363,8.8370973e-7,0.000010288356,0.0012422448,0.0000753811,0.00003137701,0.8365848,0.16194806,0.0000032163596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009054717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008878238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015766133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009163893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008692344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06648898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089437330","doi":"10.1093/chinesejil/jms048","title":"Dealing with Compliance and Non-Compliance: The Case of the Landmine Convention","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chinese Journal of International Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compliance (psychology); Obligation; Convention; Persuasion; Political science; State (computer science); Law; Control (management); Law and economics; Business; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Computer science; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.05044417631193153,"score_gpt":0.3689975353635101,"score_spread":0.31855335905157856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089437330","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48409933,0.0034934431,0.024999201,0.135568,0.00074801454,0.0006109095,0.00004574473,0.00011795881,0.3503173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97937554,0.00044129742,0.0032217652,0.0062780855,0.00013963286,0.0002051032,0.000008543172,0.00002304216,0.010307092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9056391,0.06497759,0.0024990104,0.004243256,0.013014712,0.009626334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.933468,0.054277636,0.0044283364,0.0028202876,0.003421666,0.001584082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04615406,0.00069659605,0.0009215526,0.0021563803,0.032906197,0.013471679,0.002864932,0.029589947,0.002674407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05967593,0.00096350274,0.0015846194,0.0015918191,0.044317733,0.012382315,0.012743052,0.017298864,0.00033737227],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008167678,0.00012886635,0.004111585,0.00017038852,0.000045496105,0.013516926,0.19013664,0.00081208936,0.0011687821,0.77744204,0.004380816,0.008004681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025875974,0.000436741,0.00842247,0.0013749411,0.00023853483,0.012261579,0.30825877,0.008758403,0.006276042,0.29449406,0.35864937,0.00057028944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042348478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04726098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04615406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01371274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02183791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24408895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124417280","doi":"10.1093/chinesejil/jmm037","title":"Chinese Practice in Public International Law: 2006 (II)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chinese Journal of International Law","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disarmament; Nuclear weapon; Treaty; Political science; Law; China; United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; International law; Advisory opinion; International trade; Jurisdiction; Frontier; Nuclear terrorism; Public international law; International court; Business","score_opus":0.006302333585652492,"score_gpt":0.2919973380711846,"score_spread":0.2856950044855321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124417280","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13277261,0.033888124,0.0011470853,0.041078024,0.0027417697,0.0003231785,0.005498692,0.00021365644,0.7823369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49362338,0.026011104,0.0015101042,0.01782937,0.00094369357,0.0004856456,0.0042244634,0.000109464774,0.45526278],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980007,0.00035936857,0.00018321218,0.00023870727,0.0006866611,0.00053126755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978162,0.00064370746,0.00028971425,0.0002229366,0.000686786,0.00034051263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025306456,0.0003316512,0.00030855625,0.0033711018,0.0039210985,0.005341341,0.00069475325,0.0018987871,0.020859689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050344886,0.0003311397,0.000216459,0.014559963,0.0022115798,0.0041584093,0.0019792288,0.0017775062,0.0033518423],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056078024,0.00014436923,0.016379707,0.0010130542,0.0000101243895,0.00019801345,0.06373777,0.00015722912,0.00067139755,0.22553022,0.5453286,0.14677334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004658843,0.000026406555,0.04523997,0.00042230685,0.000004485885,0.00007905231,0.011827839,0.000090286936,0.00026843292,0.0012039718,0.94081485,0.00001776628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06244858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060476456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06244858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009350544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010525525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.124170184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135966506","doi":"10.1093/oxfordjournals.cjilaw.a000494","title":"Foreign Sovereign Immunities, Acta Jure Imperil and Acta Jure Gestionis: A Recent Exposition from the Canadian Supreme Court","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chinese Journal of International Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exposition (narrative); Supreme court; Sovereignty; Political science; Law; Art; Politics","score_opus":0.016014454812775462,"score_gpt":0.2711608097080887,"score_spread":0.25514635489531323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135966506","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030090854,0.072813585,0.0017833014,0.23190677,0.0024802184,0.00006121928,0.0010100079,0.00004088781,0.65981317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75862706,0.04923545,0.0012251817,0.07102029,0.0027888983,0.00011806792,0.00038336785,0.00007253823,0.116529055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961377,0.00036050042,0.00007216233,0.0002762877,0.0020358767,0.0011174595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99716574,0.0009517852,0.00016060586,0.00008801382,0.001417867,0.00021600178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021784378,0.00083803775,0.0006282871,0.005754291,0.025025439,0.008080656,0.0022193866,0.009103394,0.0069514774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065695783,0.0004814893,0.0008941291,0.00748034,0.01916708,0.0028465022,0.0024600998,0.009713374,0.0004354369],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013656746,0.000010628583,0.0007795578,0.00009895575,0.000015126173,0.00041339683,0.011098755,0.00035651686,0.0001285369,0.8857819,0.09378813,0.0075148367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027250477,0.000017921973,0.015694149,0.00094711216,0.00009475156,0.00029641466,0.013468003,0.00067524554,0.0002712029,0.1422795,0.8260597,0.00016877266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97707534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9885816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11828501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11828501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.068744935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8582218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2189028434","doi":"10.1093/chinesejil/jmv026","title":"The Legitimacy of Exceptions Containing Exceptions in WTO Law: Some Thoughts on EC - Seal Products","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chinese Journal of International Law","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Compromise; Seal (emblem); Fur seal; Law; Political science; Welfare; Animal welfare; Business; Law and economics; International trade; Economics; History","score_opus":0.03158335472833794,"score_gpt":0.33927620615631376,"score_spread":0.3076928514279758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2189028434","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027277343,0.012936156,0.018381082,0.6019375,0.0037706196,0.000119158816,0.00014311705,0.00011922828,0.33531576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80671555,0.007320765,0.00868212,0.13958474,0.009390211,0.0003730079,0.00013299257,0.00018425703,0.027616393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9701891,0.014747411,0.0015408259,0.004505451,0.0066298107,0.002387391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9163864,0.0705675,0.0029170797,0.0033679705,0.0060362937,0.0007247363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041340634,0.0007112822,0.0013477042,0.0033654387,0.01160173,0.024306595,0.0057621477,0.04384484,0.004816964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07621301,0.00088583067,0.0011582987,0.0032621843,0.06390532,0.03183775,0.006351365,0.031956892,0.0009351929],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009022549,0.000010250638,0.00023968855,0.000022760736,0.000003970552,0.00019116364,0.0023045382,0.00008028407,0.000049123308,0.9888664,0.0063489527,0.0018738308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032656477,0.000029164208,0.0007063065,0.0006177282,0.000023277093,0.00020036021,0.0031999736,0.001408627,0.0003793769,0.89413214,0.09919078,0.00007952665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015978357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009239461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04384484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007648606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006459957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21863276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969411572","doi":"10.1093/chinesejil/jmz015","title":"Letter to the Journal Unilateral Economic Sanctions Adopted to React to An Erga Omnes Obligation: Basis for Legality and Legitimacy Analysis?— A Partial Response to Alexandra Hofer’s Article","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Chinese Journal of International Law","topic":"Economic Sanctions and International Relations","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Legitimacy; Sanctions; Law; Political science; Obligation; Politics","score_opus":0.028822986036268004,"score_gpt":0.2835878916590214,"score_spread":0.2547649056227534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969411572","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00034672132,0.0014667608,0.000093940165,0.94856995,0.044415433,0.000012729093,0.000040875053,0.000019923835,0.005033715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007778517,0.0016602621,0.00020770484,0.90653825,0.061955616,0.000040619903,0.00002485343,0.00005262786,0.021741519],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966091,0.00087887334,0.00037503883,0.00078339624,0.000904697,0.00044888887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98302114,0.010569283,0.00057929056,0.0005530941,0.0041548614,0.0011223995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037066364,0.0007613175,0.0013857986,0.00093792914,0.0060718735,0.00789039,0.002470064,0.03815417,0.015387484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04105268,0.0007741226,0.000988605,0.0009357834,0.004367727,0.0062983725,0.0022852926,0.03728801,0.0076252646],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022531747,0.000017933886,0.00015346798,0.000034902343,0.0000053673175,0.00053352915,0.000237043,0.000021333668,0.00007589359,0.0053712837,0.99120235,0.002324347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026834743,0.000024931924,0.0005284281,0.00021387657,0.000010983975,0.00083207095,0.0010133978,0.00019338269,0.00014353613,0.0061608492,0.99080336,0.00004839886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005912367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006219798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03815417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043256734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005102589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05147624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982980602","doi":"10.1093/chinesejil/jmt020","title":"Chinese Practice in Public International Law: 2012","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chinese Journal of International Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International law; Law; Political science; United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; Jurisdiction; Territorial integrity; Law of the sea; Territorial waters; China; Geography; Public international law; Sovereignty; Politics","score_opus":0.013243303501270152,"score_gpt":0.3337845434533526,"score_spread":0.32054123995208245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982980602","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40535784,0.028657692,0.001296566,0.03807233,0.0011390091,0.00018003507,0.0017655786,0.00015743867,0.5233735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85392886,0.018811984,0.000661623,0.0068834173,0.00050432055,0.00015940165,0.0010372673,0.000044081833,0.117968984],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976788,0.00055871694,0.00020286137,0.00022208662,0.00076215673,0.0005754054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99741095,0.00089309196,0.00037698596,0.00026426045,0.0005980063,0.00045673788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033020847,0.00027521848,0.0003115554,0.0033376398,0.0037815452,0.004420109,0.0006576333,0.0011940838,0.0138097545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005920314,0.00024706297,0.00018680998,0.011835741,0.0023937274,0.0035021321,0.002022288,0.0011928428,0.0013627614],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009361985,0.00021988376,0.051028777,0.0015136707,0.000020523741,0.0007040552,0.19912128,0.0002963078,0.001454676,0.24363805,0.19469145,0.3072177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005670883,0.00005126332,0.0839755,0.0006303347,0.000011072734,0.0002573436,0.043677855,0.00033362626,0.0005467415,0.0025624707,0.8679159,0.000032080192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039837234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043949887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039837234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008818308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009671184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0792107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3117729792","doi":"10.1093/chinesejil/jmaa036","title":"Letter to the <i>Journal</i> The Status of Northwest Passage and the Position of China in the US-Canada Dispute: Some Comments in Partial Response to the Exchange of Views between Michael Byers and Emma Lodge on the One Hand and James Kraska on the Other","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Chinese Journal of International Law","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Position (finance); Law; Political science; History; Economics","score_opus":0.02346961957077942,"score_gpt":0.2873819857278728,"score_spread":0.2639123661570934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3117729792","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044738082,0.0013735867,0.000054533255,0.9276837,0.039653637,0.000033461994,0.00033586618,0.00006315726,0.030354688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006636465,0.0015105237,0.0001752599,0.85413575,0.027597405,0.000097992335,0.00015593917,0.00011949807,0.109571055],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99698716,0.00046902068,0.00032959878,0.0003478816,0.0013145144,0.0005519209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886885,0.0044720415,0.00071429624,0.00025331695,0.004322779,0.001548988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003198583,0.0008072889,0.0011316879,0.001386619,0.009581682,0.007160961,0.002081553,0.032060523,0.026911395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03272704,0.000744013,0.00082973985,0.0020208498,0.003215775,0.0042960416,0.0019696427,0.017309923,0.016895877],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008295876,0.000002563407,0.000046621622,0.000014343395,7.9469123e-7,0.000081233135,0.000107491476,0.0000067269366,0.000032750428,0.0009696494,0.99818474,0.00054472813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019188625,0.000013408691,0.0007874738,0.00016277311,0.000006608192,0.00017015485,0.0012993381,0.000080838,0.00014295267,0.00140447,0.9958715,0.000041346328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07718149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08707365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92281854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010925269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017249292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1534645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124250298","doi":"10.1093/chinesejil/jmq019","title":"Case Note: China - Measures Affecting Trading Rights and Distribution Services for Certain Publications and Audiovisual Entertainment Products (WT/DS363/AB/R)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chinese Journal of International Law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Entertainment; Distribution (mathematics); Library science; Political science; Advertising; Law; Media studies; Business; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01092295653149403,"score_gpt":0.2584201872422023,"score_spread":0.24749723071070825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124250298","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6535439,0.00084226695,0.0018246351,0.021731915,0.0003617744,0.0013119531,0.0016420869,0.00013742418,0.31860408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8995316,0.00039666993,0.0008353961,0.0062640794,0.00013973385,0.00034287237,0.0003300837,0.000019354728,0.0921402],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961028,0.000426525,0.0002718384,0.00040403704,0.0016890608,0.0011058184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978986,0.00054654956,0.00041059707,0.00029403408,0.0004904264,0.0003597465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030929688,0.0005370409,0.00032823923,0.0016892683,0.0033551657,0.0017109987,0.0014220474,0.0051188967,0.01147969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004794398,0.00034172204,0.00043175125,0.0021751472,0.002185091,0.0014854196,0.0021040747,0.002222621,0.00089811604],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013702929,0.0013373641,0.20376305,0.0005271716,0.00024962515,0.036714356,0.019281566,0.0045289625,0.013511368,0.4147456,0.22331794,0.080652826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007231856,0.0012727595,0.26912078,0.0003291514,0.0003301206,0.010067443,0.011495666,0.0087776985,0.030428017,0.026656922,0.6403082,0.0004901057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.097745106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.117298044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.097745106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067193694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071937647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19435239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186636713","doi":"10.1093/chinesejil/jmab012","title":"The Emergence of Objective Guidelines for Granting Immunity to International Non-Governmental Organizations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chinese Journal of International Law","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Jurisdiction; Multilateralism; Alliance; International law; Promulgation; Law; State (computer science); Public administration; Treaty; Politics","score_opus":0.024410157548660605,"score_gpt":0.3933129916985274,"score_spread":0.3689028341498668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186636713","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11230592,0.004843631,0.17742184,0.26226088,0.0025021727,0.0011885165,0.00027513938,0.00042462233,0.43877727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8841028,0.0010856519,0.06278824,0.030598357,0.00073223386,0.0011448576,0.00014202557,0.00012149434,0.019284321],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8923684,0.059244365,0.013073528,0.007156819,0.022603847,0.00555305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.781273,0.14800386,0.019251386,0.018206857,0.02813848,0.0051263594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11023437,0.00046715498,0.0006945652,0.0035295598,0.0065888856,0.015928194,0.003861799,0.013363413,0.0013835087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12862927,0.0009336215,0.00067272974,0.001860381,0.03432507,0.0103613585,0.008122707,0.014036922,0.00044423447],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032806372,0.00003664958,0.0013320958,0.000051208,0.0000051301918,0.00005711401,0.005994375,0.0002432911,0.00019417124,0.97794527,0.0061560194,0.007981397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005908431,0.00020025474,0.007728236,0.0021150038,0.000051422656,0.00029851004,0.015597485,0.004090009,0.0016541244,0.6814385,0.28655094,0.000216412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009676557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014256186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11023437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007998025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032094594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58298206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}