{"meta":{"query_hash":"b707ee484f54","filters":{"venue":"Chinese Sociological Review"},"cohort_total":8,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":8,"exported":8,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/b707ee484f54","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Chinese+Sociological+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W2553396936","doi":"10.1080/21620555.2016.1227239","title":"Liberalism and Postmaterialism in China: The Role of Social Class and Inequality","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chinese Sociological Review","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Inequality; China; Socioeconomic status; Collectivism; Economic inequality; Exceptionalism; Demographic economics; Social class; Residence; Social inequality; Sociology; Economics; Development economics; Individualism; Political science; Demography; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.019386928416103684,"score_gpt":0.3314836082945181,"score_spread":0.31209667987841444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2553396936","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87721217,0.11079036,0.0003883294,0.0021738885,0.000106156425,0.0000250364,0.00013916548,0.000006219489,0.009158726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96529406,0.033774916,0.00011162739,0.00007952567,0.00007335897,0.000009635441,0.00006742566,0.0000012735597,0.00058815285],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99966764,0.00010358915,0.000025449168,0.000046121753,0.000089853755,0.00006732944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994698,0.00012584383,0.00019417047,0.000019318479,0.00009430158,0.00009659736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007891633,0.00023351227,0.00034737826,0.002058009,0.00057596795,0.0008457301,0.00032769956,0.00020829201,0.0009127712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009401664,0.00008796297,0.0003156207,0.0027066024,0.0011704258,0.0005350439,0.00056682114,0.00028961804,0.000038002225],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011999209,0.0001001167,0.7287669,0.0022584961,0.00045012552,0.0008928019,0.009095215,0.001227796,0.0010403657,0.028961897,0.0027063224,0.22437994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057944612,0.000051880095,0.9860356,0.00023578086,0.0000952331,0.00013851684,0.0015719391,0.0005130537,0.00010906758,0.0025271748,0.008701309,0.000014717231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03910316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047483712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03910316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017175506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024005568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0777511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606085826","doi":"10.1080/21620555.2017.1307689","title":"Social Capital and Job Search in Urban China: The Strength-of-Strong-Ties Hypothesis Revisited","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chinese Sociological Review","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Interpersonal ties; Social capital; China; Seekers; Strong ties; Demographic economics; Human capital; Capital (architecture); Economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Labour economics; Sociology; Political science; Economic growth; Social science; Geography","score_opus":0.07337269301819598,"score_gpt":0.37581627596071965,"score_spread":0.30244358294252366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606085826","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935076,0.0024780112,0.0003363522,0.0009574475,0.000022232847,0.000011762527,0.00006740723,0.0000021497797,0.0026169082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989672,0.00079268817,0.000047240224,0.000024611876,0.000016695114,0.0000048368306,0.00002218685,4.0916862e-7,0.00012424261],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994653,0.00017560055,0.000035988738,0.00008842913,0.000116933246,0.00011777632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813014,0.00063687854,0.00067018246,0.00007657556,0.00014992553,0.0003364072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013362317,0.00023969555,0.00030686441,0.0020233826,0.00088301935,0.0009876982,0.00044550965,0.0003223028,0.0016938442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003160593,0.00012786484,0.00030292978,0.003056869,0.0012470672,0.001158978,0.0011573016,0.0003743157,0.00005573261],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058186117,0.00006250859,0.956674,0.0002908618,0.0001740428,0.00024180395,0.004612426,0.00074917555,0.00024545725,0.007907334,0.00052747835,0.028456751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004487673,0.00003307632,0.99318874,0.00008011263,0.000063483734,0.00004309064,0.003236761,0.00096450595,0.00004749948,0.0014753134,0.00085654185,0.0000064889336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030990768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051302455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030990768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016045445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017633507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061620772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2974267046","doi":"10.1080/21620555.2019.1654368","title":"Social Tolerance of Homosexuality: A Quantitative Comparison of Mainland China, Singapore, and Taiwan","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chinese Sociological Review","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Religiosity; Mainland China; Homosexuality; China; Affect (linguistics); Mainland; East Asia; Political science; Sociology; Economic growth; Gender studies; Demographic economics; Development economics; Socioeconomics; Psychology; Social psychology; Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.10014704175437286,"score_gpt":0.4911815008805299,"score_spread":0.3910344591261571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2974267046","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984894,0.0007301509,0.000022474054,0.000034029472,0.0000032877992,0.000007934172,0.000078682955,5.781523e-7,0.0006333049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987822,0.0007480072,0.000039859922,0.000024195986,0.0000059227223,0.00002154512,0.00017332916,6.828564e-7,0.00020420204],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956447,0.0001413878,0.00007770477,0.00004276492,0.00012643788,0.000047202568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885917,0.00020899765,0.0005447968,0.00003518437,0.00017181633,0.00018009888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008612539,0.00016162932,0.00031487385,0.001645065,0.0004163923,0.00072623795,0.00021308128,0.00021772142,0.0010495596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015684523,0.00010159359,0.00024337134,0.0022406422,0.00043126175,0.00038466888,0.0005605267,0.000203922,0.00009300277],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054070748,0.0000519907,0.9657733,0.00025791948,0.0001380496,0.00024514573,0.01922709,0.000022605094,0.00045400104,0.00016585458,0.0002422398,0.013367773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014655436,0.000040064242,0.9843092,0.00003354562,0.000016813095,0.00013034516,0.014809557,0.00002521594,0.000032201093,0.0000181496,0.0005798361,0.0000035660853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008277252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016116487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008277252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050628907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071072055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016458094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088590462","doi":"10.1080/21620555.2020.1820319","title":"How Did Wuhan Residents Cope with a 76-Day Lockdown?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chinese Sociological Review","topic":"Disaster Management and Resilience","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.04487943583121075,"score_gpt":0.33338016122534475,"score_spread":0.288500725394134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3088590462","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9516441,0.017158147,0.00020892218,0.01898946,0.0005500315,0.00007620357,0.00019480709,0.000009610804,0.011168698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97333014,0.017472804,0.00020430483,0.002979698,0.0001144097,0.000080320824,0.00013118213,0.0000047534104,0.005682508],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948174,0.00019705495,0.000020902931,0.00005623301,0.000058203022,0.00018601713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996233,0.00009216577,0.00007614652,0.000015020029,0.000098934426,0.000094382645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012829968,0.0002679415,0.00031730303,0.00046318604,0.0027356488,0.0014555708,0.0007874659,0.0011068628,0.0017975937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024124356,0.00018548733,0.00026348137,0.00071644917,0.001428271,0.0025072026,0.001469224,0.0012508419,0.00018268876],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015071491,0.00015841628,0.08019481,0.0023918685,0.00015328775,0.0043946505,0.7098139,0.00017119135,0.0017442775,0.011857537,0.029927071,0.15904227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001145166,0.0002259745,0.09320105,0.000894461,0.00007529851,0.00083068403,0.79140985,0.00009888405,0.00047565758,0.0012312406,0.11147882,0.00006660284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04345141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0894561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04345141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023285577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005291441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08639699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092029746","doi":"10.1080/21620555.2020.1814139","title":"Social capital and COVID-19: a multidimensional and multilevel approach","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chinese Sociological Review","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":147,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Social capital; Context (archaeology); Capital (architecture); Authoritarianism; Survey data collection; Social trust; World Values Survey; Control (management); Politics; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Economics; Democracy; Geography; Social science; Statistics","score_opus":0.12354037297585925,"score_gpt":0.4003000227180859,"score_spread":0.27675964974222667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092029746","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79805946,0.08116569,0.056197334,0.024380112,0.0005325817,0.0008024549,0.002373789,0.00006565095,0.036422968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850316,0.006889786,0.0067372,0.00035640737,0.00008746909,0.00019940315,0.00020408534,0.000004381983,0.0004895169],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973054,0.0016437664,0.00014391,0.00034259865,0.00032170603,0.00024265193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963212,0.001938452,0.0009323183,0.00018003985,0.00033473107,0.00029324443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029152052,0.00049882464,0.0005893759,0.0052803415,0.0014071991,0.0022193887,0.0006831927,0.00066644565,0.0016647412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005380414,0.00020268041,0.00075134035,0.0049959966,0.0021073893,0.0027613621,0.0030707112,0.0013223,0.00007161413],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013093017,0.00021070839,0.6308624,0.002830368,0.0022975497,0.0007968172,0.013544626,0.0055752094,0.00058649626,0.1737188,0.0045456644,0.16490036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024401374,0.00031868645,0.83154124,0.0027851902,0.0011522108,0.00034502693,0.015807189,0.016689116,0.00040341503,0.10213113,0.028673947,0.00012859203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018487388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02383862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018487388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003658508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020080274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036759555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213305492","doi":"10.1080/21620555.2021.1998771","title":"Property in whose name? Intrahousehold bargaining over homeownership in China","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chinese Sociological Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Demographic economics; Socioeconomic status; Wife; Autonomy; Distribution (mathematics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Inequality; Housing tenure; Economics; Labour economics; Sociology; Geography; Political science; Demography","score_opus":0.06022535508619389,"score_gpt":0.3388988201303736,"score_spread":0.2786734650441797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213305492","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.106475316,0.8814671,0.00021973852,0.002580867,0.00029106127,0.000016573427,0.00012484161,0.00000475824,0.008819689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33622935,0.66102624,0.00014031514,0.00038360595,0.00033185378,0.000014942432,0.00013315301,0.0000022299632,0.0017383354],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999663,0.00009449646,0.000037972455,0.00005167131,0.00009102059,0.00006174764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997876,0.000073857416,0.000055865625,0.0000059249874,0.00004443025,0.000032215645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009881048,0.00029940388,0.00041259237,0.0024353433,0.0006733143,0.00093299954,0.0004764323,0.00039167402,0.0015244742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009300631,0.00012371338,0.00033096707,0.0031603856,0.0008998802,0.0011337121,0.00052313355,0.0002952604,0.0000662379],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014569829,0.000082667335,0.12374968,0.011046131,0.00028881265,0.001271309,0.012598703,0.00080059515,0.0007812047,0.03360101,0.01668679,0.79894733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000329243,0.0002315901,0.6874486,0.008199694,0.00053095643,0.0019652913,0.018456826,0.0014169348,0.0006259018,0.0084135905,0.272578,0.000099705445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053175543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07821267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053175543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001656623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030207713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10573202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391616044","doi":"10.1080/21620555.2024.2307480","title":"Cultural capital—field connections for three populations of Chinese students: a theoretical framework for empirical research","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chinese Sociological Review","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"China; Sociology; Cultural capital; Immigration; Cultural reproduction; Field (mathematics); Diaspora; Gender studies; Social science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.24238154117735297,"score_gpt":0.5878083731002631,"score_spread":0.3454268319229101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391616044","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54940796,0.32879245,0.008940541,0.033301305,0.00040967885,0.00050846796,0.00040661517,0.000019302515,0.07821366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91498935,0.07894995,0.0021929457,0.00085044984,0.00016699613,0.00048295097,0.00015078831,0.0000030645595,0.0022134918],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987255,0.00063247385,0.000075939024,0.00017995769,0.00020478034,0.00018138243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987073,0.0007733321,0.0002080603,0.000067487534,0.00015418895,0.00008962518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029602156,0.00059089455,0.0006627925,0.0050487593,0.0028285002,0.004126801,0.0013681822,0.0013224676,0.0015905997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037417037,0.00026215857,0.00046891326,0.007025973,0.008373019,0.0067908936,0.0022725165,0.0012309895,0.00007397932],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005733214,0.00031117155,0.062936224,0.0028753532,0.00013520363,0.00080122385,0.04870303,0.0008596349,0.00033958763,0.68884915,0.0032067406,0.1909254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007110977,0.00026526902,0.293496,0.0077811,0.0004483308,0.0012901248,0.24172108,0.008777153,0.00070437795,0.31585604,0.12943412,0.00015538289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034118593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028730068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034118593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008548104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006649665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06783998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415403857","doi":"10.1080/21620555.2025.2569085","title":"Migrants’ reference group selection: insights from the multidimensional assimilation framework","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chinese Sociological Review","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Group (periodic table); Assimilation (phonology); Reference data; Data assimilation; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.0363254786629172,"score_gpt":0.36886967559058165,"score_spread":0.33254419692766446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415403857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8964444,0.05312984,0.013291272,0.007684626,0.00022891069,0.00009240417,0.00016605615,0.000016798675,0.028945772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843211,0.01268258,0.0016844429,0.00024752386,0.00006926343,0.000041547093,0.000063610016,0.0000035598423,0.0008863393],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915624,0.00051560847,0.000040466843,0.000094815136,0.000098174525,0.00009472341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934834,0.0002480393,0.00015728627,0.00004039245,0.00011230981,0.000093663475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002254258,0.00031461968,0.0003826421,0.0015652396,0.0010181066,0.0012306237,0.0004979095,0.00040540233,0.0012403546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020631773,0.00010265223,0.0005756645,0.0015092554,0.0021461055,0.0013070469,0.0015202407,0.0005337824,0.00007825545],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022065926,0.00014888997,0.33840415,0.002133969,0.00037252592,0.0013857664,0.0754144,0.0017344133,0.0014246651,0.2229593,0.0027123452,0.3530889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042744683,0.00032100335,0.7247309,0.0018242192,0.0003961489,0.0011809509,0.06847058,0.0059522814,0.00055345066,0.12597495,0.07044765,0.00010507167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064631198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008183206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064631198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011077789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013519078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}