{"meta":{"query_hash":"b6112cf6b137","filters":{"venue":"Cinema Journal"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/b6112cf6b137","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Cinema+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W1983939065","doi":"10.1353/cj.2011.0015","title":"Eleventh International Domitor Conference: University of Toronto and Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada, June 13–16, 2010","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cinema Journal","topic":"Cinema and Media Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Movie theater; Media studies; Entertainment; Scholarship; Mainstream; Attendance; Eleventh; Greenwich; Theme (computing); Sociology; Exhibition; Film studies; Political science; Visual arts; Library science; History; Art history; Art; Law","score_opus":0.025771195672784984,"score_gpt":0.17980741039704368,"score_spread":0.15403621472425869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983939065","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.529582,0.0127569735,0.0017475324,0.0025695297,0.0078757275,0.00019274905,0.00031590607,0.00001794066,0.44494164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9741248,0.0055906177,0.0004222011,0.000043601776,0.00021418468,7.537935e-8,0.000004151859,0.0000068475847,0.019593539],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944305,0.000010350083,0.00019378377,0.00014758804,0.000051763887,0.00015343583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993859,0.000019347926,0.00026917268,0.00009438378,0.00009741662,0.00013379488],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001517656,0.00009228902,0.0002573188,0.000032974178,0.000119370765,0.000010365017,0.00020604239,0.000048816764,0.0056078457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029389012,0.00010806847,0.000056733512,0.000023034365,0.00006179958,0.00028503058,0.00008185202,0.00009752068,0.0000052938235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065099687,0.00032032427,0.33672324,0.00006911841,0.0010270397,0.00024097192,0.013719634,0.0000019105453,0.00014849646,0.13226293,0.50588816,0.008947167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003903391,0.00017040287,0.45692524,0.000071214345,0.000058766633,0.00008600986,0.022010056,0.00016038126,0.000083453044,0.0016819346,0.51445526,0.00039390614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.58858895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9170855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44454277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047850262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000119784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613275414","doi":"10.1353/cj.2017.0026","title":"Gnawing at the Whiteness of Cinema Studies: On Asian American Media Now","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cinema Journal","topic":"Cinema and Media Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Movie theater; Aesthetics; Asian americans; Ambivalence; Media studies; Sociology; Gender studies; Invisibility; Ethnic group; Art; History; Visual arts; Anthropology; Psychology","score_opus":0.07126515830147866,"score_gpt":0.2940285438316795,"score_spread":0.2227633855302008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613275414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9306523,0.0072416235,0.00006819361,0.023248237,0.003485655,0.00015572745,0.000044864493,0.00001323928,0.035090134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99281704,0.0033695125,0.000115332085,0.0003666729,0.0010588535,0.000010564484,0.000001496312,0.000025747624,0.00223479],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985001,0.000022020651,0.00076513464,0.0002661402,0.000104776664,0.00034184766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972173,0.0002449516,0.0016148404,0.0006671299,0.00012905746,0.00012669535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009264709,0.00020323686,0.00077757065,0.00018369804,0.0010300176,0.000084645115,0.0005547348,0.000040727708,0.00020900907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019269016,0.0001434122,0.00021972659,0.00012301924,0.0005008009,0.00013552228,0.00021694705,0.00029163566,0.00017516915],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003044631,0.00029986395,0.79751396,0.00019980776,0.0015837114,0.00017889496,0.026028926,0.00022822982,0.00036970628,0.019778077,0.121326506,0.032187846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031971876,0.00061554485,0.87568265,0.0005085177,0.00010642719,0.00021648806,0.017725438,0.000109879074,0.0010167693,0.009668529,0.0904737,0.0006788471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000033005537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000505638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07816871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010380478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025671467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79221666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791256430","doi":"10.1353/cj.2018.0016","title":"The Persistence of the Sad Young Man","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cinema Journal","topic":"Cinema and Media Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sadness; Queer; Psychology; Stereotype (UML); Beauty; Aesthetics; Femininity; Gender studies; Psychoanalysis; Social psychology; Art; Sociology","score_opus":0.036982745255548954,"score_gpt":0.21691845098460827,"score_spread":0.17993570572905931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791256430","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8426221,0.01407578,0.0002535971,0.012067751,0.0048497915,0.00013295756,0.000013079609,0.000008328744,0.1259766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992941,0.00104628,0.00006890418,0.00018559542,0.0006923455,0.0000019146412,8.891298e-8,0.0000065704066,0.005057285],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993361,0.000010428857,0.00033804882,0.00009208182,0.0000429042,0.00018039958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993032,0.000050167295,0.00030535398,0.0002212875,0.0000784911,0.00004149305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045822628,0.00006643058,0.00015710326,0.000039012775,0.00055464334,0.000039464827,0.00031728746,0.000024556612,0.0001559436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028938733,0.000037905225,0.00011288706,0.0001355481,0.0002506257,0.00005382378,0.00006918426,0.00014613783,0.0000873275],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006577271,0.00009133967,0.67565423,0.00003838422,0.00032435078,0.000008030809,0.00940835,0.00000622157,0.00062807545,0.082261674,0.22253878,0.00897477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007364298,0.00020950158,0.5365396,0.00007107704,0.00002439193,0.00026113557,0.0027745392,0.00013868372,0.0005554012,0.016743205,0.44176632,0.00017968775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013680311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009555215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21922755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026614282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017724142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4265924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}