{"meta":{"query_hash":"a418229c28ac","filters":{"venue":"Cogency"},"cohort_total":6,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":6,"exported":6,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/a418229c28ac","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Cogency"},"results":[{"id":"W2800557704","doi":"","title":"Depicting Visual Arguments: An ART Approach","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cogency","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Computer science; Argument map; Key (lock); Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.045060525917095806,"score_gpt":0.35903240672919123,"score_spread":0.3139718808120954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800557704","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60257316,0.00015871454,0.0022790493,0.000022833183,0.0008130948,0.00012754806,0.0000047655694,0.00006381867,0.39395702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99140066,0.0000067481737,0.0004115574,0.00018625364,0.00051655713,0.00005164439,0.000060139522,0.000020171336,0.007346272],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990847,0.000077976205,0.00015396444,0.0003076622,0.000121363446,0.00025431332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991924,0.000012851786,0.00012325634,0.0005429048,0.000042263226,0.00008628987],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002239132,0.00011041398,0.00012080399,0.00004172907,0.00037690115,0.00008826111,0.00027769088,0.00009167818,0.0017240294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006672658,0.000101230864,0.000059789905,0.00003228633,0.000048766644,0.00021271507,0.000043853066,0.000117058524,0.0015098454],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022787336,0.003314953,0.1456107,0.000073933654,0.00046494693,0.00025494283,0.015426136,8.839288e-7,0.00967562,0.026921283,0.011851973,0.78617674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008058434,0.0015957078,0.8571945,0.000106288935,0.00071178615,0.0004169102,0.029178444,0.00083898957,0.0071879537,0.020589931,0.07160069,0.0025203782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006149381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000108781105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78365636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000116227375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011215825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900268178","doi":"","title":"Aproximación a la investigación sobre diálogos argumentativos","year":2018,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Cogency","topic":"Social Sciences and Policies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Logos Bible Software; Property (philosophy); Flexibility (engineering); Modal; Computer science; Sociology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.030363769835443914,"score_gpt":0.37095208248112965,"score_spread":0.34058831264568573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900268178","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4034122,0.0005463408,0.000073425785,0.007152193,0.0020969985,0.00051637215,0.000054186243,0.0001519303,0.5859964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98683476,0.0016529706,0.0002159498,0.0013702055,0.0031912604,0.000038753333,0.0000038079213,0.000022430058,0.006669867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99698716,0.00053488405,0.00036221117,0.00049282145,0.000761328,0.0008615774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861026,0.00024966974,0.00022353369,0.00028989257,0.00019427773,0.00043236592],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009624564,0.00028116954,0.00030609086,0.000100629884,0.0017017291,0.00044655532,0.0008171236,0.00028583,0.0015400315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041030528,0.0002592167,0.00018037084,0.0013248351,0.0047399406,0.0003997007,0.00018195609,0.00020908374,0.001838933],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028919012,0.00031140944,0.07583033,0.00006827077,0.000099216784,0.000019855088,0.17872152,4.280813e-7,0.0029771673,0.5767831,0.03902417,0.12613559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042701242,0.0004015357,0.020065326,0.00010497637,0.000088679786,0.0000042542138,0.013003671,0.00006871445,0.0016659551,0.05953773,0.90399957,0.0006325782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005908453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009816616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8649754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010590763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005467294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982205312","doi":"","title":"Hans V. Hansen, Ed., Riel’s Defence: Perspectives on His Speeches, McGill-Queens University Press, 2014, 331 pp., $32.95 (pbk), ISBN 97807773543362","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cogency","topic":"Military History and Strategy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Media studies; Sociology; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.02224501807989796,"score_gpt":0.25009341873064694,"score_spread":0.227848400650749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982205312","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08872598,0.013427334,0.0005272283,0.0049716914,0.0020499032,0.00093184545,0.0008852663,0.0005516013,0.88792914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.838117,0.034676794,0.0003574198,0.00014085895,0.0006749086,0.000008245848,0.000010331433,0.000034224417,0.12598024],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99742836,0.0005098279,0.00022973934,0.00071194366,0.0005052671,0.0006148457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985791,0.00024569134,0.00012027067,0.0005086753,0.00022098662,0.00032531342],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005475552,0.00026654254,0.0002757087,0.000068121655,0.0014243338,0.000019548435,0.00063794764,0.00026204874,0.0030122912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027767284,0.00023198703,0.00021542131,0.00022740377,0.00090118014,0.0004895189,0.000066559296,0.00022730567,0.0005821176],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025456442,0.00042123906,0.001240967,0.00002811984,0.000094906,0.00018306727,0.019160766,0.0000057427574,0.0022415684,0.46575263,0.50265956,0.00795687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038583073,0.00019038684,0.0009614373,0.000049797854,0.00004493287,0.0000025253732,0.010849751,0.0000028789666,0.00045793835,0.0017276782,0.984923,0.0004038259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00601357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017185593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76194894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006499419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003612885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998568607","doi":"","title":"Collateral Beliefs and the Rashomon Effect","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cogency","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Collateral; Argumentation theory; Cognition; Psychology; Work (physics); Social psychology; Rash; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Medicine; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.020396544838116714,"score_gpt":0.22962599050379426,"score_spread":0.20922944566567755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998568607","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7760521,0.0026116013,0.000045465054,0.0044531045,0.0019436948,0.00041056148,0.00002604224,0.00007562255,0.21438178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9782703,0.00016844076,0.0000040758596,0.00036667468,0.00069264165,0.00001943449,0.0000012523401,0.000009097465,0.020468114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994226,0.00013853646,0.00010994331,0.00012027534,0.000071399045,0.00013725732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933225,0.00040610964,0.000039942646,0.0001510644,0.00004095342,0.0000296586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036633166,0.000086322645,0.0001484736,0.000015960093,0.00026033795,0.00004170033,0.00008808559,0.00003559529,0.00029852116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005025192,0.000036999798,0.000059730148,0.000009800887,0.0008318203,0.000066414585,0.000033710716,0.00006531808,0.00012429748],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009064481,0.000019302566,0.0016017568,0.000048291386,0.00006568472,0.0000047891644,0.021095255,2.9720146e-8,0.00068246986,0.94027096,0.004600529,0.0315203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041979337,0.00035780622,0.0015849167,0.00010195986,0.0001279792,0.0000115054445,0.00041063983,0.0000064703027,0.0021126044,0.16447212,0.826294,0.0003220919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000058582013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020093101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8216934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006273245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011929479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32685974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207571416","doi":"","title":"Studying Argumentation Behaviour / Estudiando el comportamiento argumentativo","year":2017,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Cogency","topic":"Higher Education Teaching and Evaluation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Panacea (medicine); Humanities; Political science; Politics; Epistemology; Dialogical self; Philosophy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.08290131220310663,"score_gpt":0.4568799103540673,"score_spread":0.37397859815096063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207571416","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96832323,0.00035120395,0.00018203606,0.0037158604,0.0040703756,0.00066418544,0.000018843122,0.000071618626,0.02260263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929175,0.0005566783,0.00016043778,0.00010329419,0.00073995546,0.0000828634,0.00005414621,0.000023766674,0.005361382],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974485,0.00032473297,0.00047487364,0.00047495714,0.0008571296,0.0004197967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981272,0.000088484645,0.0007553371,0.00060210156,0.00021790284,0.00020895521],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018295351,0.00022811713,0.00025505965,0.00010737381,0.004915823,0.001014901,0.0006212701,0.000119248725,0.00082916854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003748865,0.00024853263,0.0001224893,0.00013191032,0.00028358953,0.0007670263,0.00009234134,0.00021225185,0.00082320056],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010714096,0.00060051103,0.92563146,0.000024057703,0.00006526362,0.0000040890345,0.052329727,0.000006105251,0.000321957,0.0045494977,0.0025050917,0.013951515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010887401,0.00011536835,0.9716999,0.00011560773,0.00025429024,8.54448e-7,0.016507696,0.00003970934,0.00044565997,0.0013368091,0.00802948,0.00036590252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003988376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034333245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04606841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002802909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003075289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412992671","doi":"10.32995/cogency.v16i2.435","title":"Revisting Kant and Husserl on the Copernican Turn","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cogency","topic":"Philosophy and Historical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Copernican principle; Philosophy; Epistemology; Turn (biochemistry); Physics","score_opus":0.04803846954802803,"score_gpt":0.23304204641811058,"score_spread":0.18500357687008254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412992671","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023165874,0.0029564875,0.000005888889,0.0050576795,0.0004801553,0.00009397709,0.000009523824,0.000037111615,0.9681933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.971349,0.0000980998,0.0000053213917,0.0015918025,0.00041609225,0.000009467667,0.0000012323088,0.000004288646,0.026524687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996097,0.00002863776,0.00010220973,0.00011160418,0.000057453937,0.00009039707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996678,0.000116854506,0.000025945319,0.0001392894,0.000028386852,0.000021674578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009932329,0.0000643058,0.00008413451,0.000022862925,0.00048376614,0.000058574868,0.00010355596,0.000014725229,0.0005204818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009244484,0.000038651164,0.00003324001,0.00002925656,0.000119717646,0.000028683895,0.00003205022,0.00010221461,0.00006389901],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005647102,0.000016888082,0.000025159985,0.00001504869,0.00000918054,0.0000017973317,0.0022030547,5.0793567e-8,0.000037426682,0.9795561,0.013373585,0.004756069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051274917,0.000028455472,0.00011119653,0.00005769322,0.000014427838,3.4793376e-7,0.00017213581,0.000008786251,0.000048453996,0.044213098,0.9552371,0.000057035122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002378125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000037665206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9481831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017359693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001370524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56989104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}