{"meta":{"query_hash":"edf9ebea6585","filters":{"venue":"Cognitive Psychology"},"cohort_total":27,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":27,"exported":27,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/edf9ebea6585","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Cognitive+Psychology"},"results":[{"id":"W1938224621","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.08.006","title":"Why is number word learning hard? Evidence from bilingual learners","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"James S. McDonnell Foundation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Cardinality (data modeling); Successor cardinal; Word (group theory); Language acquisition; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Natural language processing; Computer science; Linguistics; Mathematics; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.15996354514276942,"score_gpt":0.41930267307637453,"score_spread":0.25933912793360514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1938224621","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92591727,0.00030826664,0.017573463,0.0027002243,0.0004784697,0.0004208357,0.000020618545,0.0003743183,0.05220653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9665901,0.00009320569,0.017221227,0.012487193,0.0003579929,0.00005935178,0.00002152429,0.0001114638,0.003057942],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975512,0.00030954706,0.00046858698,0.00073184614,0.00043286887,0.0005059626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99552584,0.0032386093,0.00019149284,0.00023837828,0.00048787688,0.00031782663],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062765664,0.00032931627,0.00049369544,0.00009010509,0.0001128659,0.000060330112,0.00026253719,0.00020511376,0.0039499938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009457701,0.0002968935,0.00013836211,0.00030697873,0.00030693758,0.00023301343,0.00019654394,0.000559564,0.0067572333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024984744,0.0027569663,0.1426082,0.00019902195,0.0014356661,0.00096276513,0.054973204,7.3793103e-7,0.0027335281,0.0040026833,0.55578375,0.23204498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0051534455,0.00058715674,0.014734269,0.0018842923,0.00034465993,0.00017624062,0.014106821,0.00005412533,0.0072990637,0.9320167,0.022094961,0.0015482844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007005948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004789534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.928014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060662187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000102663034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983497409","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2014.10.001","title":"Inferring action structure and causal relationships in continuous sequences of human action","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Air Force Office of Scientific Research; Office of Naval Research","keywords":"Action (physics); Causal inference; Causal structure; Artificial intelligence; Segmentation; Computer science; Inference; Bayesian probability; Sequence (biology); Bayesian inference; Causal analysis; Statistical inference; Machine learning; Causal model; Mathematics; Econometrics; Statistics","score_opus":0.08760751538783097,"score_gpt":0.3933740214607582,"score_spread":0.30576650607292727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983497409","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98712087,0.00008605163,0.00045124846,0.00015350316,0.00036987846,0.000119782446,0.0000064914575,0.00002882799,0.011663359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99945766,0.0000088668285,0.000079046236,0.00016522582,0.00009928288,0.000010348964,0.000027888802,0.000010849985,0.00014083795],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988607,0.00036608824,0.00023466248,0.00031270456,0.000060605023,0.00016519532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999471,0.00020787948,0.00014428067,0.00008324843,0.000057680314,0.000035906734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002837248,0.00010673467,0.00019338698,0.00017566221,0.00009126291,0.000008111295,0.00004700368,0.00016785944,0.00033621554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015024979,0.00010710393,0.000020139498,0.0001178883,0.00015005565,0.000060191287,0.000017712802,0.00041174784,0.000024844694],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015145112,0.00008469375,0.89638513,0.000018296045,0.000039931394,0.00000658291,0.0033946594,0.0000013209848,0.038609907,0.0065755784,0.00011219459,0.054620277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009664632,0.00025520637,0.9934445,0.000054215972,0.00001431333,0.000039838174,0.001002689,0.0000033053498,0.00090241694,0.002704536,0.0005015048,0.00011102844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000052807016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023728883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09705938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015451058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008430095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43675715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999852774","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.02.001","title":"Twenty four-month-old infants’ interpretations of novel verbs and nouns in dynamic scenes","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":126,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"BC Innovation Council","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Verb; Construals; Noun; Object (grammar); Psychology; Linguistics; Animacy; Natural (archaeology); Grammatical category; Event (particle physics); Cognitive psychology; Modal verb; Construal level theory; History; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02672257404628848,"score_gpt":0.3507544811712936,"score_spread":0.3240319071250051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999852774","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95792705,0.00052046747,0.001912605,0.0009784822,0.0004207084,0.00025060808,0.000037582522,0.000034833887,0.03791764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99681026,0.00007206404,0.0004852818,0.0021386726,0.000029403553,0.000018638733,0.000027398924,0.000013984081,0.00040432173],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986672,0.000102367325,0.00036777655,0.00047904876,0.00008361759,0.00029998983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993286,0.00021229497,0.00013911017,0.00016709785,0.00008782164,0.00006505961],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021312309,0.00017320015,0.00030772033,0.0002750122,0.000046649642,0.000009900875,0.00012425368,0.00014342496,0.00028747332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015540577,0.00017568344,0.000053899555,0.0002451607,0.000190066,0.000058325717,0.000031696894,0.0002907894,0.000063767155],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022391977,0.0033634303,0.4978562,0.000036325277,0.0003210873,0.00014161372,0.024729034,0.0000050661765,0.01594818,0.011772258,0.0008179715,0.44276965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029182932,0.0004999448,0.9944398,0.00015301841,0.000022455997,0.00005817083,0.00053929875,0.00006183569,0.000026871005,0.0006163927,0.00048088288,0.00018308239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027853943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000713929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49658358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018986153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001965219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7164163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003984649","doi":"10.1016/s0010-0285(03)00100-2","title":"Category specificity in normal episodic learning: Applications to object recognition and category-specific agnosia","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Recall; Episodic memory; Agnosia; Psychology; Object (grammar); Categorization; Cognitive psychology; Identification (biology); Semantic memory; Task (project management); Cognitive neuroscience of visual object recognition; Semantics (computer science); Amnesia; Recognition memory; Cognition; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.05508349420805006,"score_gpt":0.3258385657307778,"score_spread":0.2707550715227277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003984649","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7403418,0.0013389364,0.005922148,0.00051923946,0.0005253743,0.0010657932,0.000025094881,0.00013502398,0.2501266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99578243,0.000255027,0.00032843745,0.0016095317,0.00016309103,0.0006140007,0.00012522152,0.000048039346,0.0010741975],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970763,0.00062725384,0.00046262666,0.0010712421,0.00013441971,0.0006282135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894863,0.0003279945,0.00013482134,0.0002278231,0.00014212963,0.0002185717],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006199218,0.000306329,0.000366231,0.00047588773,0.00021467684,0.000038574453,0.00014364503,0.0002482559,0.002959036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014474402,0.0003395968,0.000065249435,0.00063498394,0.00022218037,0.00007115074,0.000044415225,0.0007996146,0.005117814],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013070652,0.002352436,0.3808609,0.000049165894,0.00020095313,0.00032804627,0.015158516,0.000006229777,0.0037670357,0.024465043,0.01044023,0.56106436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018175167,0.00043147785,0.8383787,0.000036597874,0.000018760104,0.00017647215,0.0020678896,4.7051367e-7,0.00023236153,0.002811651,0.15356119,0.00046687445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000049058763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000056854922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5605975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060041497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038144808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010882233","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.07.002","title":"A synchronization account of false recognition","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Synchronization (alternating current); Artificial intelligence; Variety (cybernetics); Natural language processing; Context (archaeology); Representation (politics); TRACE (psycholinguistics); Process (computing); Machine learning; Linguistics","score_opus":0.10253078515524851,"score_gpt":0.37577417702909377,"score_spread":0.2732433918738453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010882233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96128416,0.000301851,0.0062392647,0.000104897124,0.00054889364,0.00018511462,0.000034086257,0.000037017926,0.031264707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966419,0.00019162797,0.00008551385,0.0028505675,0.00013646466,0.00002842458,0.000009445728,0.000009710979,0.000046391047],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991073,0.00011339669,0.00020105713,0.00022859212,0.00011487768,0.00023479118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935305,0.00019762988,0.00015387271,0.00009746003,0.00014110428,0.000056880388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018351234,0.00008804248,0.00012399763,0.00009163659,0.000056940724,0.000008290852,0.00010102998,0.000073081,0.00085616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010723815,0.00008010263,0.000030442825,0.00028241545,0.00019550098,0.00038225576,0.000023322575,0.00008507134,0.00053528266],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003608607,0.0009666581,0.024108466,0.00014205495,0.000019370696,0.0000067947653,0.001680166,0.0000011042684,0.47657955,0.0016634532,0.0009484679,0.49352306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016458589,0.0005313359,0.060219277,0.00015748995,0.000066987326,0.00015876375,0.00053018885,0.000061824656,0.92278415,0.00864802,0.0047707646,0.0004253429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002167969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.12014e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49309772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007531697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015816857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93743515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068077127","doi":"10.1016/s0010-0285(02)00515-7","title":"An evidential support accumulation model of subjective probability","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Statistics; Social psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.46493024468392175,"score_gpt":0.5474355811487335,"score_spread":0.08250533646481173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068077127","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89328957,0.000009780641,0.09326876,0.000044088792,0.00048154403,0.00026603206,0.000057873895,0.000022007234,0.012560368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972843,0.000003001617,0.0022562935,0.000285743,0.000027550806,0.000017562556,0.00001006264,0.000011809559,0.00010369604],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99722815,0.00053895096,0.00079728884,0.00079257105,0.00040623435,0.0002368139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99701184,0.00086797547,0.0003995932,0.0005783736,0.0010306683,0.00011153082],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003010402,0.00014893126,0.00036965212,0.00027405642,0.00008613185,0.00006287488,0.00040913996,0.00017297472,0.0011497093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040259995,0.00012773981,0.00014160709,0.00037994495,0.00030472787,0.00050512573,0.000038593826,0.00015520684,0.000309206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009675348,0.0018893784,0.19745836,0.0000043823634,0.000038479368,0.000011198754,0.0021573864,0.0019508828,0.007177884,0.0037659202,0.00093787024,0.78364074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011398636,0.00064984354,0.100625485,0.000011832533,0.000043311433,0.000022035896,0.0005387829,0.004643377,0.0027052173,0.8891361,0.00023057581,0.00025358124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000066643875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003678671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8853702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030430934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013059557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070654369","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.04.001","title":"Prototypicality in sentence production","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institute of Mental Health","keywords":"Phrase; Sentence; Psychology; Recall; Linguistics; Cued recall; Cognitive psychology; Natural language processing; Computer science; Free recall","score_opus":0.07623335017309739,"score_gpt":0.411410531715289,"score_spread":0.3351771815421916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070654369","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98846436,0.000024483932,0.00067399227,0.00089890504,0.0006343046,0.00058153743,0.0000033668448,0.0000631216,0.008655927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928216,0.000012767865,0.000064613785,0.0067320806,0.00014462718,0.000030810872,0.000002062402,0.0000074061704,0.00018406152],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859643,0.00020994633,0.00021295347,0.0005850499,0.00007145551,0.00032418972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994602,0.00024669294,0.000059438586,0.0001457532,0.000043715703,0.000044180073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005125676,0.00009678991,0.000119361954,0.00012635619,0.000048508467,0.0000047117946,0.00012182335,0.00009535798,0.00007700798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019329523,0.00008619771,0.000029287983,0.00030958632,0.00036852816,0.000065332904,0.000030421512,0.00027560937,0.00016730087],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000549278,0.00037167754,0.017587475,0.000008325266,0.0000017251726,0.001466051,0.00051313255,7.8958344e-8,0.9461884,0.00022167477,0.000083052124,0.033009112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010276164,0.00027919165,0.16219054,0.000037513764,0.000005476235,0.0015112229,0.00020218249,0.0000015310391,0.8288766,0.0037611872,0.001880383,0.00022653022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000042801007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000032281547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14460306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010385337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010903361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35150406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077870071","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.03.001","title":"Direct lexical control of eye movements in reading: Evidence from a survival analysis of fixation durations","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":165,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; General Electric (Canada)","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Fixation (population genetics); Eye movement; Word lists by frequency; Psychology; Fixation time; Eye tracking; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Audiology; Speech recognition; Communication; Artificial intelligence; Population; Medicine","score_opus":0.06502420408107573,"score_gpt":0.4111665289427572,"score_spread":0.34614232486168145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077870071","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9640914,0.00048172494,0.016999025,0.00013884873,0.00067457015,0.00023427198,0.00016457224,0.000014901682,0.017200675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989038,0.00002808006,0.00015355728,0.0002646896,0.000060058715,0.00008656138,0.00013370853,0.000010346011,0.00035917718],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979204,0.00062859704,0.0006500512,0.00033768325,0.000166511,0.00029676157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977872,0.001374056,0.00033954147,0.00024124353,0.00018429176,0.0000736948],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072515884,0.00013902945,0.00053922844,0.0005735889,0.000025728474,0.000004908015,0.00013024648,0.0001412867,0.0012539291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005507326,0.000135219,0.00012424207,0.0008725687,0.00013056294,0.00013529447,0.000019324805,0.0001321717,0.000062186795],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051331986,0.00061319553,0.97703075,0.0000046671503,0.0013285034,0.0000032931216,0.010581893,0.000004433642,0.0052092327,0.00037057576,0.00011810407,0.0042220093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012850278,0.000091472655,0.9963844,0.00008845044,0.0003175863,5.512136e-7,0.0006605392,0.00006287229,0.0007647449,0.00009664972,0.00012786052,0.00011984156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004171149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000057693844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03481241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003094043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017709222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103808064","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.07.001","title":"Finding one’s meaning: A test of the relation between quantifiers and integers in language development☆","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":306,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Relation (database); Linguistics; Test (biology); Psychology; Development (topology); Mathematics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11028545910884129,"score_gpt":0.36748145281882666,"score_spread":0.25719599370998536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103808064","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9771406,0.00004255939,0.0018051177,0.00015276943,0.00004325108,0.00030266403,0.0000066184116,0.000029539808,0.02047685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99593955,0.000011078854,0.0036827803,0.00014620538,0.000016568454,0.000016613449,0.000004237838,0.0000193772,0.00016357454],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989074,0.00008644105,0.00039727718,0.00024319638,0.00016243738,0.00020326496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99749184,0.0021271505,0.00016198201,0.000099940815,0.000073854026,0.00004520888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033250646,0.00013382365,0.00028170287,0.00013437838,0.000098480916,0.0000049614537,0.00011052379,0.00009874546,0.00006419593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029868518,0.00010580223,0.000039332484,0.0002741961,0.00028572374,0.00006568921,0.000095498304,0.00022524569,0.000032197742],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008149288,0.00067325716,0.9159209,0.00017163671,0.0001577729,0.00004710685,0.042395286,2.7908854e-8,0.005425827,0.006942316,0.00025984945,0.027924523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010674592,0.00005659732,0.9404261,0.00053631165,0.0000291135,0.000030715044,0.0018269061,0.0000024947433,0.013067049,0.042759188,0.000018238276,0.00017978786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000066293082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004396171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04056838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030901934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038261816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.431449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143177887","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.06.001","title":"Intuition, reason, and metacognition","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":694,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Metacognition; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Intuition; Metamemory; Feeling; Task (project management); Fluency; Cognition; Social psychology; Cognitive science; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.511818764827479,"score_gpt":0.4999096014207356,"score_spread":0.011909163406743417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143177887","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88783777,0.0001770862,0.018983204,0.00020148026,0.00064836856,0.00013727065,0.000039132912,0.000047104746,0.09192858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964789,0.000063293905,0.001284682,0.0018580573,0.00006689907,0.000023189663,0.000009637178,0.00001262421,0.00020268987],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813807,0.00022725936,0.0005023936,0.00067900494,0.00023062843,0.00022261476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812,0.00068830216,0.00021690932,0.00029564695,0.0005467806,0.00013233421],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013995792,0.00014437425,0.00027483384,0.00032844674,0.00012560208,0.00007924783,0.00026594306,0.0001387086,0.0029327385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020354288,0.00011692262,0.000076813456,0.00033384992,0.00034946387,0.00030415365,0.000096954565,0.00016010698,0.0024237868],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013129028,0.00012845451,0.009565426,4.944856e-7,0.000013484178,0.000024079229,0.00060121896,1.2143834e-8,0.00010274562,0.0009171009,0.0031401073,0.9853756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074241724,0.00027900757,0.20765626,0.00002038353,0.00004862892,0.00014784354,0.0007786972,0.000012552005,0.00037390983,0.78379893,0.00593776,0.00020358553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009807197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018120227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.985172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008699077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016956723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99835294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143191307","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.07.002","title":"The relations between children’s communicative perspective-taking and executive functioning","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":285,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Psychology; Comprehension; Perspective-taking; Inhibitory control; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Flexibility (engineering); Cognitive flexibility; Task (project management); Executive functions; Control (management); Developmental psychology; Working memory; Linguistics; Social psychology; Empathy; Computer science","score_opus":0.05796548876664552,"score_gpt":0.36023069516105316,"score_spread":0.3022652063944076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143191307","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6270816,0.0037458243,0.0016203232,0.0029455007,0.0003087079,0.0003737293,0.000024521125,0.00011633545,0.3637835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960176,0.00019880988,0.00017386256,0.0007380789,0.00020191005,0.0000761594,0.000029676978,0.000027183205,0.0025367194],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981963,0.00053299154,0.0002638971,0.0005275195,0.000109791225,0.00036947345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997807,0.0013503483,0.00025296633,0.00028114623,0.00022252879,0.00008600115],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034574125,0.00019695726,0.0002272037,0.000106168765,0.0018314412,0.000024506311,0.00020253067,0.00013664443,0.00036083584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004294126,0.00016053994,0.000069740774,0.00023693166,0.0010650938,0.00006655869,0.00012549927,0.0007411414,0.00046451972],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016532738,0.00009272596,0.931019,5.469648e-7,0.0004935887,0.000013291908,0.020637434,1.4661623e-7,0.00001690807,0.02895689,0.0032184,0.015385718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010712644,0.00019614196,0.9851981,0.000029510678,0.000049410526,0.00020464508,0.006316423,7.994696e-7,0.000004595574,0.0018438281,0.004889807,0.00019548899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000076324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016427366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36893606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000559449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034327906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145539134","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.05.003","title":"Infants’ categorization of novel objects with more or less obvious features","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Animacy; Categorization; Object (grammar); Perception; Basis (linear algebra); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Communication; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Mathematics; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.03835209384245323,"score_gpt":0.35510436653465227,"score_spread":0.316752272692199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145539134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8942576,0.0004209944,0.005297734,0.0012351607,0.00047590368,0.00043018913,0.000044804758,0.00010847772,0.097729154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99273974,0.000023362752,0.0012239492,0.0026353274,0.00024065052,0.0000442774,0.00007581827,0.000037450267,0.0029794502],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998645,0.00007557232,0.000269125,0.0005188072,0.00015015429,0.00034132495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913895,0.0001706811,0.00019654771,0.0002042184,0.00021246665,0.00007712099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012517541,0.00021702745,0.00030748453,0.00017646098,0.00007665203,0.000010883392,0.00015794308,0.00018315094,0.00075470237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000096956435,0.00016189387,0.000045216006,0.00032894255,0.00025202264,0.00005926893,0.000033015676,0.0002939605,0.00012232021],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.018689033,0.0066559124,0.21923839,0.000117938,0.0017075344,0.00037633217,0.06933012,0.00006149512,0.014427702,0.01862913,0.014792179,0.6359742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004672506,0.0007234085,0.98698246,0.00009506666,0.000056287707,0.00032815337,0.0023106462,0.0000046436144,0.0007260295,0.000028425378,0.0037835303,0.00028884987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003259189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012354349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76774406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019274748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006344119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8263462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166622580","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2014.06.003","title":"Win-Stay, Lose-Sample: A simple sequential algorithm for approximating Bayesian inference","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":134,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Bayesian inference; Inference; Bayesian probability; Causal inference; Simple (philosophy); Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Bayesian statistics; Computer science; Sample (material); Cognition; Bayesian network; Algorithm; Psychology; Mathematics; Econometrics","score_opus":0.04510515411885032,"score_gpt":0.3822291281749095,"score_spread":0.3371239740560592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166622580","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02384112,0.00007066351,0.93543595,0.00038268603,0.0010235241,0.0006520236,0.00016569743,0.00018951729,0.038238816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94657236,0.000005255601,0.0472179,0.003990531,0.0008685388,0.00032979724,0.00037841455,0.00007231558,0.0005648894],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973059,0.00032855818,0.0005094315,0.00093910383,0.00015454701,0.0007624092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975736,0.001484969,0.00025014477,0.00029824523,0.0002253407,0.00016767127],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006882456,0.00032378084,0.000446565,0.0001661057,0.00026787832,0.000048673664,0.00027685892,0.00024647595,0.0020530268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009953256,0.00032736125,0.0001506371,0.0002205714,0.00023673402,0.00006873953,0.000087669636,0.00039418464,0.0004497844],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020015491,0.00033133134,0.00808813,0.000024821238,0.0002149441,0.000012790689,0.0020461474,6.6203023e-7,0.00031400446,0.012764474,0.0028756734,0.9731269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.022867665,0.0053822175,0.4393674,0.00038516914,0.0004458572,0.00029115376,0.003580824,0.011583104,0.00081703084,0.115309745,0.39650524,0.0034645954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000040678126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015676147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96966225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029494227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004321466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168614750","doi":"10.1016/s0010-0285(02)00005-1","title":"Developments in young infants' reasoning about occluded objects","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":155,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development","keywords":"Object (grammar); Object permanence; Cognitive development; Psychology; Occlusion; Event (particle physics); Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Cognition; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Medicine","score_opus":0.031350210968495516,"score_gpt":0.3346793893219285,"score_spread":0.303329178353433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168614750","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45070314,0.0007786389,0.000092114555,0.00014248834,0.00096666603,0.0002479419,0.000009692511,0.00010218754,0.54695714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919346,0.00011282906,0.0005238125,0.002606912,0.0001457366,0.00010572802,0.000043075528,0.000047310743,0.0044800015],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973433,0.0002896097,0.0004947692,0.0008871129,0.00018719977,0.0007980051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917036,0.00018106653,0.00015908392,0.0002507322,0.0000982953,0.0001404479],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037221762,0.00031029747,0.0003893384,0.0003870651,0.00014015574,0.000030336125,0.0002559538,0.00026247205,0.005198116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028804713,0.0003263718,0.000073607334,0.00037199823,0.00015853695,0.000088341534,0.00008677008,0.0006151891,0.005765632],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033325367,0.00070439256,0.8669627,0.000010435583,0.00019036683,0.00053956965,0.024597194,3.2123296e-7,0.00032803434,0.0020970954,0.00663645,0.09760019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003123912,0.00013715966,0.985512,0.00017618481,0.000014097089,0.00020982132,0.00080316776,0.0000057801653,0.00004509922,0.0001016884,0.009461282,0.00040976433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006504036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002086541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54247713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000062175466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022043128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2460541753","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.06.003","title":"Numerical morphology supports early number word learning: Evidence from a comparison of young Mandarin and English learners","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Institutes of Health; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Mandarin Chinese; Plural; Meaning (existential); Linguistics; Psychology; Word (group theory); Language acquisition; Noun; Philosophy","score_opus":0.053593565919583315,"score_gpt":0.37936824155538323,"score_spread":0.3257746756357999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2460541753","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97329956,0.000116751726,0.016275877,0.0003139533,0.00022890943,0.000292449,0.000018063076,0.00012228795,0.009332144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99605507,0.0000774645,0.003026257,0.00013869241,0.00008566314,0.00004180337,0.000005158178,0.000045958146,0.000523918],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99776417,0.00031256824,0.00060741697,0.0006261626,0.00026581637,0.00042389298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943132,0.0046845768,0.000307143,0.00018461057,0.0003367811,0.00017367871],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036674875,0.00027634384,0.0007066753,0.00008638718,0.00007917086,0.000020586573,0.00016943026,0.00021260674,0.002423862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056440444,0.00020557629,0.00009677203,0.000164941,0.0006330465,0.00017365265,0.00016337556,0.00032859098,0.00038190966],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005923716,0.0005333755,0.9296356,0.000043189382,0.0001963425,0.000091273716,0.0066605676,1.5866478e-8,0.0023386874,0.0010090721,0.0015652943,0.057334214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004330045,0.0009931843,0.79161465,0.0016626191,0.0002628953,0.00013981225,0.0029145482,0.000006497063,0.013167243,0.18363795,0.000404063,0.0008664918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004869061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016919323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18262887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027655471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030012083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99848807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2549527009","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.11.002","title":"To infinity and beyond: Children generalize the successor function to all possible numbers years after learning to count","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; James S. McDonnell Foundation","keywords":"Successor cardinal; Function (biology); Concept learning; Psychology; Mathematics; Arithmetic; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.025891895629875625,"score_gpt":0.33451480186453275,"score_spread":0.3086229062346571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2549527009","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97073334,0.000028194963,0.011018691,0.0056143254,0.0001715779,0.00089986564,0.000040195566,0.00012692058,0.011366863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9658952,0.000015918498,0.0030394748,0.028871525,0.0001287735,0.00028359276,0.0000047400226,0.00004934136,0.0017114861],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984054,0.00014655436,0.00029175365,0.000501636,0.00022988216,0.00042480603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984413,0.000838579,0.00006597019,0.00018076302,0.00018509802,0.00028833866],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043586982,0.00022546538,0.00027601825,0.00013336782,0.00010653801,0.00005377152,0.00015798087,0.00009516574,0.00080741954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012900757,0.0001446793,0.000056685592,0.00024741096,0.00009819742,0.00009428476,0.00024101429,0.00015991197,0.0022501664],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0068992097,0.0017970864,0.21825083,0.00011210812,0.0016511504,0.00016790377,0.029069312,0.0000012776861,0.010775757,0.01776389,0.15627714,0.55723435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001873323,0.0009631741,0.8919965,0.00024838705,0.0001358286,0.00006709738,0.0005248924,6.9504296e-7,0.0007775215,0.09191301,0.010872074,0.00062752253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002435479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013064587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67374563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000429406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001756487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767118421","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.09.001","title":"Enabling spontaneous analogy through heuristic change","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Heuristic; Constraint (computer-aided design); Analogical reasoning; Transfer of learning; Transfer (computing); Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Mathematics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.14086271268605213,"score_gpt":0.42381001370908306,"score_spread":0.2829473010230309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767118421","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46079826,0.0014588535,0.0014127108,0.0031342525,0.004216014,0.00048424272,0.000043978747,0.00017671645,0.52827495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885426,0.00013693047,0.00020459866,0.0068855355,0.0010792812,0.000116134506,0.000041013973,0.000048535734,0.00294533],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978319,0.00019487673,0.00030219377,0.000871017,0.00012921263,0.0006708164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985714,0.00022912194,0.0002885657,0.00066129287,0.0001332724,0.00011635327],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026600523,0.00027770307,0.0003940864,0.000112416914,0.00066779385,0.000073636475,0.0005022165,0.00023959001,0.0042921714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044522577,0.00027435244,0.00011452737,0.00007516386,0.00044813164,0.00012393882,0.00014824646,0.00047763865,0.004647477],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027145331,0.0015666465,0.14354083,0.00005704212,0.0010541573,0.027060743,0.023616672,1.4863907e-7,0.00092698465,0.057864737,0.015880039,0.7257175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017431317,0.00039242784,0.89172083,0.000072173585,0.000055282515,0.0018739043,0.0004274575,0.0000012731695,0.000016777949,0.0023764984,0.10095786,0.00036234772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013867943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005730374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74818003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025295545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021908447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789247124","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.12.003","title":"Planning to speak in L1 and L2","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Encoding (memory); Sentence; Utterance; Linguistics; Psychology; Verb; Computer science; Communication; Natural language processing; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.09228624685077182,"score_gpt":0.4385164497824907,"score_spread":0.3462302029317189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789247124","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9697321,0.000056858382,0.00015330856,0.00080068683,0.0004003007,0.00015129437,0.000008332715,0.00003413184,0.028662989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96726704,0.000007765671,0.0000760205,0.032225553,0.0001931541,0.0000087964145,0.0000010988787,0.000008993286,0.0002115638],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989332,0.00014411873,0.00012314071,0.00049356854,0.00003970323,0.00026628995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950755,0.00027035238,0.000029163553,0.00010140387,0.000026899024,0.00006462108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012344304,0.00009532854,0.00012630572,0.00015851198,0.000057951347,0.0000100593625,0.00011079936,0.00007168555,0.00012879672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071675325,0.00008717695,0.00001358765,0.00019581617,0.00037387884,0.000039698087,0.00007127999,0.00014562767,0.00036402917],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045909785,0.00012548291,0.01541685,0.000005215833,0.000004131265,0.0026461151,0.006853676,8.36842e-8,0.93012595,0.00017633688,0.0014975445,0.042689487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0052845427,0.0040252344,0.3810346,0.00024389148,0.000025541094,0.0046638553,0.001634028,0.000015872018,0.56758755,0.0065082307,0.027983274,0.0009933747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004474434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016934036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36561775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000035585665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000069486637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46789798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908121483","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2018.12.002","title":"Relations between numerical, spatial, and executive function skills and mathematics achievement: A latent-variable approach","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":150,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Western University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Latent variable; Structural equation modeling; Spatial ability; Mediation; Confirmatory factor analysis; Set (abstract data type); Test (biology); Spatial relation; Mathematics; Mathematics education; Psychology; Cognition; Computer science; Statistics; Biology; Geometry","score_opus":0.028210386717824863,"score_gpt":0.30485096655105554,"score_spread":0.27664057983323065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908121483","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5155499,0.00015301481,0.41103724,0.0002917495,0.00013352722,0.0015004638,0.00007097763,0.00019208592,0.071071066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95320755,0.000038272436,0.044163637,0.0005930551,0.000072218354,0.00010552942,0.00005536942,0.00006763018,0.0016967197],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981336,0.00012694801,0.0004965158,0.00061817234,0.0002331617,0.0003916088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974262,0.00180539,0.00022286293,0.00019698874,0.00017791669,0.00017060374],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004244514,0.00031655608,0.0005676087,0.00014939072,0.00016532854,0.000054813845,0.0000962119,0.00020949102,0.00045300735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005949811,0.00027904293,0.000058762747,0.00025601182,0.00021093473,0.00018303073,0.00018433268,0.0003159625,0.00043568006],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049404,0.011736902,0.5510599,0.0019406944,0.0031510768,0.000035628025,0.010333599,5.5918053e-7,0.002415836,0.34552816,0.007444771,0.06585882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036147146,0.0007140098,0.21530075,0.00043351215,0.00049590995,0.000069551206,0.0010739584,0.0001462658,0.00022108665,0.7765472,0.00066135713,0.00072171056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008659415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000016873375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43765768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029004143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023212297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951513593","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.11.002","title":"Compositional inductive biases in function learning","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Cognitive Science and Education Research","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Companhia Brasileira de Metalurgia e Mineração; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Principle of compositionality; Inductive bias; Computer science; Predictability; Artificial intelligence; Property (philosophy); Cognition; Prior probability; Numerosity adaptation effect; Natural language processing; Machine learning; Cognitive psychology; Bayesian probability; Multi-task learning; Psychology; Mathematics; Statistics; Task (project management)","score_opus":0.3245244709197464,"score_gpt":0.5116112390370984,"score_spread":0.18708676811735198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951513593","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90108895,0.000010946759,0.00046544807,0.0017401613,0.0005228026,0.00016986116,0.0000092355795,0.00002328796,0.09596933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99723315,0.000031208965,0.000013200679,0.0018802236,0.00013483466,0.00006808449,0.000008495847,0.0000075971175,0.00062317326],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847806,0.0002887125,0.00013558629,0.0005253673,0.00021590586,0.0003563851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988021,0.00067662535,0.000108615364,0.00015569979,0.00017249324,0.0000844698],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034479945,0.00009451213,0.00011038271,0.00026688425,0.00072368066,0.00011335422,0.0002670406,0.00006304709,0.0008293051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00483997,0.00009496453,0.000034913883,0.00020258171,0.00082841853,0.00042361458,0.000093125855,0.00041191198,0.00087551074],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00077097415,0.0008567259,0.28174865,0.000006753679,0.000010980066,0.00011083862,0.00095991493,0.000005704367,0.48103377,0.0024191672,0.00075826683,0.23131825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009136755,0.000267644,0.96802336,0.000052666743,0.0000043107043,0.000026785587,0.00076490204,0.00006560397,0.025100542,0.0034492211,0.0011923142,0.00013894532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029097084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022934506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6862747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002719626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007033768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205792376","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2021.101441","title":"Distributional social semantics: Inferring word meanings from communication patterns","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Language and cultural evolution","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Semantics (computer science); Meaning (existential); Natural language processing; Computer science; Word (group theory); Linguistics; Distributional semantics; Artificial intelligence; Lexical semantics; Word lists by frequency; Lexical item; Psychology; Semantic similarity; Sentence","score_opus":0.04501003298091999,"score_gpt":0.39004370293095797,"score_spread":0.345033669950038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205792376","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9610823,0.00044981268,0.0049384455,0.005788684,0.00027131193,0.00008602231,0.00015939104,0.00006901653,0.02715506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99663705,0.00012756107,0.0000895516,0.0014619995,0.00042664554,0.000014327929,0.0008990171,0.0000052015075,0.00033863637],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989279,0.00037995237,0.00012974945,0.00020386814,0.00015581846,0.00020271337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993321,0.0001419689,0.00007325944,0.00008327053,0.00032344993,0.000045994333],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016266038,0.0000705377,0.000106445696,0.000016415943,0.0005846934,0.00004660189,0.00012783095,0.00012763504,0.0017220489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003062493,0.000073556555,0.000058296893,0.0001488705,0.00021127492,0.0001461325,0.000060234783,0.00017336487,0.00014595716],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021193952,0.0008829683,0.35686934,0.000022427692,0.00054031075,0.00020254383,0.20980504,4.3702792e-7,0.009203786,0.12379588,0.015706582,0.28275874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001103533,0.000018590088,0.9113539,0.0000926917,0.000085355285,0.000007984826,0.039811343,0.000006277194,0.0006042872,0.02060916,0.025998905,0.00030796215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007581261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028590444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55448455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049669758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053779924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216246799","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2021.101443","title":"Hypothesis testing, attention, and ‘Same’-‘Different’ judgments","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Intuition; Converse; Psychology; Stimulus (psychology); Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Perception; Set (abstract data type); Social psychology; Computer science; Mathematics; Cognitive science","score_opus":0.3584158466734584,"score_gpt":0.4618216681543257,"score_spread":0.1034058214808673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3216246799","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97969186,0.00017546928,0.0015391699,0.00088784314,0.0007369067,0.00009131067,0.00004944866,0.000035235676,0.016792772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99382395,0.000036249574,0.0014380194,0.002737712,0.00008016991,0.0000142621075,0.0000057934935,0.000015900476,0.0018479226],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976842,0.00026314714,0.00054551644,0.0009098157,0.00031849448,0.00027886825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99491507,0.00362935,0.00022555687,0.00038662602,0.00069991825,0.00014350505],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065261597,0.00017426806,0.00035975093,0.00020654013,0.00016967834,0.00022647536,0.0002764484,0.00013007486,0.0012727819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009392593,0.00014272003,0.000094436844,0.0004364226,0.00023598706,0.00014523031,0.00018876494,0.00016421758,0.0013184698],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025871763,0.00016580429,0.16428651,8.717483e-7,0.000015807587,0.000061775776,0.00005554801,1.0186886e-7,0.0012983417,0.000044759818,0.0034137617,0.83063084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009233797,0.00012515421,0.80898696,0.000042722277,0.000043097283,0.00019236268,0.00053297397,0.000031074123,0.0003973849,0.18519329,0.0033150623,0.00021655564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000050425583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028805876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8304143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015354695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031035728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311090216","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2022.101530","title":"Evidence for abstract representations in children but not capuchin monkeys","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"H2020 European Research Council; Horizon 2020; European Research Council; European Commission; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Horizon 2020 Framework Programme","keywords":"Container (type theory); Test (biology); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; A priori and a posteriori; Sample (material); Developmental psychology; Item response theory; Type (biology); Computer science; Psychometrics; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.12703347230149345,"score_gpt":0.4328558121151719,"score_spread":0.30582233981367846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311090216","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97219104,0.0005308535,0.0006536017,0.002442456,0.000830854,0.0010026026,0.00020029403,0.00007473257,0.022073543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924952,0.000027146167,0.00021159044,0.0036947597,0.00016426473,0.0010899584,0.0001478207,0.000032203036,0.002137079],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796826,0.00026088947,0.00037940365,0.0008042312,0.00015662344,0.00043060211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986531,0.00080671534,0.00015181284,0.0002521051,0.00006589678,0.000070334325],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004766997,0.00017288163,0.00023962445,0.0002584529,0.00027959194,0.000015786612,0.00028052228,0.000076238204,0.0052179936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004099085,0.00019602006,0.00010821467,0.00028438124,0.000105712694,0.00006483005,0.00010958243,0.00054500817,0.00037076013],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028130545,0.0013848892,0.8524291,0.000011666581,0.00032339123,0.00011660336,0.0067660366,0.000043039203,0.0026239385,0.004310162,0.020495089,0.10868305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021682095,0.00031956597,0.9931804,0.00002793818,0.000023572029,0.00011196843,0.0011148481,0.0000053131494,0.00009065025,0.0006917899,0.0020373461,0.00022839002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022701088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027530701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14075132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006558807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005891865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99569136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319778131","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2023.101551","title":"Probability and intentional action","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Odds; Attribution; Intentionality; Psychology; Action (physics); Raising (metalworking); Social psychology; Affect (linguistics); Outcome (game theory); Odds ratio; Cognitive psychology; Logistic regression; Communication; Statistics; Economics; Mathematics; Epistemology; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.391519180613027,"score_gpt":0.4056783275995199,"score_spread":0.014159146986492899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319778131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97675925,0.000012940913,0.0005282997,0.006539706,0.0007849636,0.00016495641,0.000022032944,0.0001461354,0.015041703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99418366,0.000091874244,0.000048825208,0.0047403686,0.00007647921,0.000047154168,0.000014287107,0.000006005708,0.0007913571],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900526,0.00013057007,0.00011573825,0.00044999763,0.0000998743,0.00019857359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995961,0.00019579053,0.00003584682,0.00007312086,0.000039969917,0.000059182545],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017888226,0.00008075731,0.00008495585,0.00010409565,0.00011394567,0.000008866583,0.00006818867,0.00006757768,0.00026513138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003680087,0.000074243915,0.00003240357,0.00023499026,0.00039566026,0.0000795358,0.000050103863,0.00013699394,0.0013295749],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011429049,0.0010292203,0.03807068,0.000059176466,0.000045707628,0.0001608538,0.0004403744,0.0000024132235,0.52737343,0.03881861,0.033676986,0.35917962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009368106,0.00020207561,0.8599679,0.000016396085,0.000008041822,0.00017048906,0.00006489942,0.000041564785,0.0054365713,0.1288878,0.0041387957,0.00012868491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000010770766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000016730528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8218972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008840572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000066337625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403170673","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2024.101692","title":"Doing things efficiently: Testing an account of why simple explanations are satisfying","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Simple (philosophy); Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Computer science; Cognitive science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1290349402824772,"score_gpt":0.3388383257714088,"score_spread":0.20980338548893163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403170673","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37344697,0.0015810926,0.0059168776,0.0012917714,0.0025429719,0.0002961475,0.00036264668,0.00037120303,0.61419034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99706304,0.0000049624527,0.00022268768,0.002271527,0.0003068594,0.000015387079,0.000023351835,0.000010637474,0.00008152384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990765,0.000047329533,0.00020506087,0.00033458573,0.00014115531,0.00019540689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921066,0.00031688524,0.00009374769,0.00010687096,0.00022305737,0.000048774407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025689494,0.00010761097,0.00014362071,0.00024522617,0.00045126508,0.00010734626,0.00015954823,0.000037170208,0.0006912998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012173211,0.00010271225,0.00004396321,0.0001198791,0.00062220014,0.00057536684,0.000027655604,0.00017012723,0.000106914835],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009145797,0.0006283334,0.0016838796,0.00039456866,0.00015625719,0.00018299014,0.287452,0.000030955056,0.012035243,0.4992062,0.016294355,0.18184374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017027893,0.0017752092,0.007950794,0.0021400137,0.0003173548,0.00014142646,0.056091838,0.002596903,0.0008787578,0.16352186,0.76126623,0.0016168276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006953574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001404618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7449719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019929992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029005927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7569248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412023428","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2026.101799","title":"A Single Process for Deductive and Inductive Inference? Examining the Impact of Conclusion Typicality and Argument Validity on Immediate Inferences","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Macquarie University","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Inference; Inductive reasoning; Deductive reasoning; Process (computing); Computer science; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Medicine; Programming language","score_opus":0.25360145600071315,"score_gpt":0.5130505106296117,"score_spread":0.25944905462889856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412023428","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97902805,0.0002672483,0.00093597686,0.0012656911,0.0010973567,0.0014439453,0.00030720502,0.000025950712,0.015628595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982702,0.000497557,0.00003573114,0.0004342763,0.00031317418,0.0003550673,0.00002603679,0.000008904317,0.00005904987],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99726826,0.0010418111,0.00038381416,0.0007582035,0.00017935819,0.00036854827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957782,0.0027345356,0.00048393916,0.0001674697,0.0007309799,0.00010485317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009875068,0.00029412087,0.0005925961,0.00014776774,0.00042139945,0.000045652137,0.00029613078,0.0005989561,0.00005871771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002911159,0.00021235827,0.00011968505,0.00019710067,0.0025870765,0.000076751385,0.00032640295,0.0006360219,0.0000013837074],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005118638,0.0027836428,0.25147098,0.00034155542,0.0017845875,0.0000055704654,0.38255265,0.000004581201,0.0010270454,0.013902663,0.0007388037,0.34026927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017061799,0.0035712537,0.5976295,0.0007127235,0.00022097348,0.0000018037355,0.03143796,0.000015927331,0.00039976192,0.36367053,0.00016978843,0.00046363115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010313796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030712405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3511147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000100851255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037720325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9532191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W621487820","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.05.001","title":"What makes us think? A three-stage dual-process model of analytic engagement","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":483,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Cued speech; Decoupling (probability); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.5084308370774361,"score_gpt":0.5253165416008257,"score_spread":0.016885704523389666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W621487820","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9627094,0.00028707134,0.021891288,0.00051035464,0.0013253312,0.00025413893,0.00007977142,0.000038072816,0.012904562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965498,0.000042934767,0.00070697116,0.0015859178,0.000057467892,0.000019259494,0.000009238297,0.000020746744,0.0010076733],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99682176,0.00024961357,0.000925327,0.00087650446,0.000766675,0.00036010423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99634933,0.0009707721,0.0005235612,0.00069270324,0.0012396724,0.00022393811],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037157112,0.00023475764,0.0005851687,0.00048276095,0.00009617887,0.00022745143,0.00070546026,0.00017794814,0.00048305758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002619438,0.00018487191,0.00017423143,0.00057315803,0.00039804922,0.00067949435,0.00019819934,0.00028955835,0.0008484448],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010602779,0.0011668535,0.02874513,0.000012479102,0.0001370441,0.00015059976,0.009650537,0.0054255207,0.0004049279,0.0008983339,0.007795307,0.944553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004133555,0.0009883128,0.012658904,0.0001707108,0.00018634838,0.00004265042,0.028577613,0.06601157,0.00069551467,0.88353115,0.002237531,0.0007661076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009288997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008606641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94378686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003669123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015491647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}