{"meta":{"query_hash":"edf9ebea6585","filters":{"venue":"Cognitive Psychology"},"cohort_total":27,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":27,"exported":27,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/edf9ebea6585","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Cognitive+Psychology"},"results":[{"id":"W1938224621","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.08.006","title":"Why is number word learning hard? Evidence from bilingual learners","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"James S. McDonnell Foundation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Cardinality (data modeling); Successor cardinal; Word (group theory); Language acquisition; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Natural language processing; Computer science; Linguistics; Mathematics; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.15996354514276942,"score_gpt":0.41930267307637453,"score_spread":0.25933912793360514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1938224621","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99134505,0.0005524481,0.00011596518,0.00047578587,0.000016632512,0.0000074025124,0.000087325665,0.0000070932424,0.007392372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972976,0.00055167516,0.0001454068,0.00026229868,0.000018629737,0.000009363333,0.00008880134,0.000011721614,0.001614462],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877375,0.00026539006,0.000120469114,0.00027899272,0.00037273084,0.0001885224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98426855,0.0102035515,0.0020894958,0.0008278974,0.0018043888,0.0008061123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024246778,0.0004550931,0.00079044123,0.0011508737,0.0010657234,0.0026598284,0.0004717116,0.0012404716,0.00997041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013178161,0.00038883503,0.00019173216,0.00089647755,0.0022066275,0.0026107137,0.0017500052,0.0012234581,0.0016053978],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0035738521,0.0023625197,0.8055625,0.0010811505,0.00019357454,0.007423592,0.04972075,0.00028135988,0.025815109,0.0052007693,0.0037624359,0.09502237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046470607,0.0015064807,0.8851155,0.00064478186,0.00031579737,0.0111393295,0.05756044,0.0007320592,0.014374049,0.014019365,0.013986768,0.00014081773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073219845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00849207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00997041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061317615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011216486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033354282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983497409","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2014.10.001","title":"Inferring action structure and causal relationships in continuous sequences of human action","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Air Force Office of Scientific Research; Office of Naval Research","keywords":"Action (physics); Causal inference; Causal structure; Artificial intelligence; Segmentation; Computer science; Inference; Bayesian probability; Sequence (biology); Bayesian inference; Causal analysis; Statistical inference; Machine learning; Causal model; Mathematics; Econometrics; Statistics","score_opus":0.08760751538783097,"score_gpt":0.3933740214607582,"score_spread":0.30576650607292727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983497409","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7868261,0.00033460883,0.20683914,0.00028475077,0.000022920487,0.000049634808,0.00030610425,0.00032408987,0.005012644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9717703,0.00013797155,0.027252553,0.00002181978,0.000006880844,0.000017463068,0.00021929208,0.000027883503,0.0005458703],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945945,0.00018454588,0.000031256997,0.00018538164,0.00009837801,0.000041043077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926375,0.0057570296,0.00074094924,0.00036323466,0.00028581315,0.00021547763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010608996,0.00035295912,0.00020214525,0.0012374877,0.00030037685,0.0010101796,0.0004896813,0.0008744123,0.0035946271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013158861,0.0007156589,0.0005125617,0.00050029746,0.0010721347,0.0026597816,0.00058997533,0.0008410324,0.00028130497],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016079618,0.00064236793,0.28500742,0.0005877853,0.0005052574,0.0022909632,0.007199386,0.11707955,0.10766512,0.14990838,0.001707908,0.32579795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006056232,0.000341755,0.24729832,0.00016205417,0.00013651431,0.0012288574,0.0017645598,0.546685,0.012097482,0.18773541,0.002404864,0.00008459545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007982619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010738268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007982619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005205741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007274744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0158723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999852774","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.02.001","title":"Twenty four-month-old infants’ interpretations of novel verbs and nouns in dynamic scenes","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":126,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"BC Innovation Council","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Verb; Construals; Noun; Object (grammar); Psychology; Linguistics; Animacy; Natural (archaeology); Grammatical category; Event (particle physics); Cognitive psychology; Modal verb; Construal level theory; History; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02672257404628848,"score_gpt":0.3507544811712936,"score_spread":0.3240319071250051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999852774","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99898535,0.000060482107,0.0000994674,0.000012477463,0.000007864681,0.000008777962,0.000031301523,0.000006842219,0.00078737544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99552,0.00018276305,0.0004988943,0.000029322176,0.000006287338,0.000044491666,0.00013577807,0.000013077371,0.0035693664],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99975187,0.000039111022,0.000033474233,0.000052176107,0.000075986485,0.000047282112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974355,0.0012592139,0.00043268787,0.00018098911,0.00038343927,0.00030819426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084261707,0.00044056977,0.00042949396,0.00041588032,0.00034701283,0.0011299686,0.00040424094,0.0006594999,0.003361257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005545971,0.00043859775,0.0002809292,0.00019330236,0.0008756395,0.0005995584,0.000765545,0.0007064837,0.00092666945],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003785057,0.0020326371,0.2526625,0.0006552559,0.00018347669,0.020032825,0.09256408,0.00049841806,0.5643857,0.0017701405,0.0012732941,0.060156625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013523997,0.0057653654,0.8075434,0.00010337593,0.00034265008,0.006267087,0.05228119,0.0011929191,0.1142713,0.0015403711,0.010358436,0.00019874213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014079913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024205637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003361257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024950382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019633684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011244535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003984649","doi":"10.1016/s0010-0285(03)00100-2","title":"Category specificity in normal episodic learning: Applications to object recognition and category-specific agnosia","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Recall; Episodic memory; Agnosia; Psychology; Object (grammar); Categorization; Cognitive psychology; Identification (biology); Semantic memory; Task (project management); Cognitive neuroscience of visual object recognition; Semantics (computer science); Amnesia; Recognition memory; Cognition; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.05508349420805006,"score_gpt":0.3258385657307778,"score_spread":0.2707550715227277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003984649","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88942546,0.0034196952,0.089384645,0.0011009573,0.00007341493,0.0001136213,0.00018438498,0.00038022985,0.01591771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810621,0.0011890491,0.016009808,0.000113968956,0.000048646,0.000049841892,0.00006453589,0.000031813077,0.0014301953],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997168,0.000072217874,0.000031173884,0.00006923567,0.00007741171,0.00003306779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968611,0.001999845,0.00030179828,0.00044464399,0.00018967461,0.00020291442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011088119,0.0005291228,0.00048789292,0.0018167798,0.0003106896,0.0009610119,0.00081552024,0.0013391746,0.0017159431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005063944,0.00030415624,0.00041161184,0.0007649004,0.0030323279,0.0013468824,0.0013508281,0.0012830475,0.0001255751],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013632041,0.0011598493,0.13954136,0.00057687436,0.00014597393,0.012197969,0.0030390376,0.01371705,0.24082941,0.17392163,0.0025163866,0.41099128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012821269,0.00047037427,0.28871036,0.00014509115,0.00020375609,0.055087388,0.0015462462,0.07487212,0.05909202,0.51615924,0.0034228454,0.00016228654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013942582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012437191,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0018167798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005171132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043380822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005864024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010882233","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.07.002","title":"A synchronization account of false recognition","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Synchronization (alternating current); Artificial intelligence; Variety (cybernetics); Natural language processing; Context (archaeology); Representation (politics); TRACE (psycholinguistics); Process (computing); Machine learning; Linguistics","score_opus":0.10253078515524851,"score_gpt":0.37577417702909377,"score_spread":0.2732433918738453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010882233","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38944456,0.00084189454,0.5028885,0.0077763298,0.0005127197,0.000038836748,0.00022361011,0.0008679799,0.097405545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901962,0.000097773824,0.0068017547,0.0002120874,0.00016868622,0.000012752869,0.000048024795,0.00006667761,0.002396029],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938047,0.00016599955,0.000030917286,0.00013487665,0.00020218459,0.0000854697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99193865,0.004915683,0.00063180586,0.0016141423,0.00063259987,0.00026707532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013961084,0.00025685775,0.00030616455,0.0005036775,0.0004765563,0.0013152062,0.0010007904,0.0010660077,0.0063207885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012586573,0.00036822775,0.00031537077,0.0003975895,0.0012198932,0.004139052,0.0010137347,0.0013192376,0.0006503478],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045996334,0.00008559323,0.004078974,0.00007109896,0.00006123335,0.0006725457,0.0011776846,0.006934845,0.018486809,0.91560745,0.0045938753,0.047769897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008647525,0.000064091946,0.005918715,0.000014303832,0.00004829851,0.0006001936,0.00012931737,0.06594907,0.0058491244,0.9189736,0.0023347316,0.000032049073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005805206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038592322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063207885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038769655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003759165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021145105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068077127","doi":"10.1016/s0010-0285(02)00515-7","title":"An evidential support accumulation model of subjective probability","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Statistics; Social psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.46493024468392175,"score_gpt":0.5474355811487335,"score_spread":0.08250533646481173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068077127","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11438279,0.0008192062,0.8455836,0.007053212,0.00015685108,0.0000712592,0.0004277151,0.00019178816,0.031313546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9393218,0.00056365,0.04919005,0.00021411414,0.00031578512,0.000078298974,0.00015895156,0.000031763946,0.01012557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986211,0.00056844676,0.00007491675,0.00024497116,0.0003504231,0.0001401463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9847348,0.010503875,0.001163091,0.0015555065,0.0015183636,0.00052448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037123198,0.000693983,0.00096084893,0.0013935454,0.00076578034,0.0036605787,0.0029571042,0.0023995475,0.008298667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029296916,0.0005688908,0.0008516305,0.0015229638,0.0022742255,0.009436682,0.0016105429,0.0024516084,0.00083481614],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041511088,0.000042991294,0.00054309744,0.00003880537,0.000017638595,0.0001167142,0.00018273016,0.027690336,0.00018204033,0.96053946,0.000937445,0.00966731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012533928,0.000013434664,0.0002203995,0.000008949688,0.0000114901795,0.000040687926,0.000018725043,0.13765317,0.00006714462,0.86135864,0.00058606314,0.000008855912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021658775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017375719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008298667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012075192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010588055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027761817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070654369","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.04.001","title":"Prototypicality in sentence production","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institute of Mental Health","keywords":"Phrase; Sentence; Psychology; Recall; Linguistics; Cued recall; Cognitive psychology; Natural language processing; Computer science; Free recall","score_opus":0.07623335017309739,"score_gpt":0.411410531715289,"score_spread":0.3351771815421916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070654369","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.985151,0.00015306058,0.00478637,0.00014525883,0.000042333242,0.000023901159,0.00015631854,0.00007983086,0.009462094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971746,0.000070170754,0.0019958862,0.000061232575,0.000025834031,0.000018196542,0.000101746075,0.00006459004,0.00048767633],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999348,0.00019939293,0.000056246186,0.00018439862,0.00015765804,0.000054415683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995752,0.0022762173,0.00074167026,0.00040463498,0.00048233336,0.00034326123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009314505,0.00021759483,0.0003005407,0.00051964103,0.0004279587,0.0012877482,0.00029916308,0.000530636,0.0032521852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008531329,0.00031725343,0.00019706831,0.00026097972,0.0006093235,0.0012892233,0.0008086813,0.0007598624,0.0003728466],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012856567,0.00018569245,0.0339853,0.0003712946,0.000077572484,0.0018527562,0.0032543095,0.00074799376,0.87606406,0.019791812,0.00096341997,0.06142007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026089366,0.00090227864,0.8183348,0.000100725825,0.0001571395,0.0088722035,0.0022542009,0.015372909,0.07913152,0.07107676,0.0033903297,0.00014614656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006950072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00084969046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0032521852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029467998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042275526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010879636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077870071","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.03.001","title":"Direct lexical control of eye movements in reading: Evidence from a survival analysis of fixation durations","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":165,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; General Electric (Canada)","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Fixation (population genetics); Eye movement; Word lists by frequency; Psychology; Fixation time; Eye tracking; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Audiology; Speech recognition; Communication; Artificial intelligence; Population; Medicine","score_opus":0.06502420408107573,"score_gpt":0.4111665289427572,"score_spread":0.34614232486168145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077870071","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951165,0.00026205298,0.0028831617,0.000026732307,0.0000049818345,0.0000063926545,0.00017123212,0.0000303515,0.0014986381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99859315,0.00010284717,0.00051039265,0.00000890363,0.0000078314815,0.0000091821275,0.00015982796,0.000024961942,0.0005828487],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997769,0.000046535723,0.000012618279,0.00007762454,0.000049017635,0.00003729702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99442637,0.0038737569,0.00074343145,0.00039577333,0.0003786586,0.0001820921],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006597787,0.00022265293,0.00027122675,0.0008544592,0.00022858576,0.00058832555,0.00027552122,0.00034930868,0.0038002387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066734594,0.00023244979,0.00028627762,0.00077258644,0.00034439733,0.00060252694,0.00044146413,0.000387937,0.0005562755],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030438562,0.0002620373,0.40234303,0.00025222433,0.00038090427,0.0006744147,0.0022779715,0.0019136865,0.46977934,0.0029602738,0.0005171321,0.11559512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024486491,0.00017029348,0.9915018,0.000010023709,0.000055930323,0.00021716466,0.00014016485,0.0026922175,0.004001243,0.0009556954,0.00021866991,0.000012312617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024686991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032502874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038002387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018579992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018583819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012713075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103808064","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.07.001","title":"Finding one’s meaning: A test of the relation between quantifiers and integers in language development☆","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":306,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Relation (database); Linguistics; Test (biology); Psychology; Development (topology); Mathematics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11028545910884129,"score_gpt":0.36748145281882666,"score_spread":0.25719599370998536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103808064","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9621942,0.00024025403,0.005999793,0.002859014,0.00006882671,0.0000234724,0.00008360547,0.000032820688,0.02849807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925494,0.00011627272,0.005374346,0.0003288704,0.000024452525,0.000019884368,0.00009827864,0.000013126055,0.0014753961],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992054,0.00028528518,0.00005806066,0.00019496736,0.00021750304,0.000038904025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863679,0.009901272,0.0015775488,0.0011460162,0.0006416376,0.0003656673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027648928,0.00029024,0.00023422201,0.00055040093,0.00052111695,0.0015635912,0.0008779412,0.0010290473,0.0064407745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024174316,0.00023883369,0.00038245777,0.00037136755,0.0038700802,0.0060390066,0.0011375741,0.0019861846,0.0005175193],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00332686,0.002707531,0.17547882,0.0010170443,0.0005027877,0.0011443712,0.02716821,0.0048380974,0.049855888,0.47223517,0.011063183,0.25066203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047028906,0.0015742199,0.13769647,0.00016897361,0.00026713772,0.0017194643,0.010749758,0.02000582,0.01689151,0.791873,0.018422196,0.00016124437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009528316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005356258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064407745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025246074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048595885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021546602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143177887","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.06.001","title":"Intuition, reason, and metacognition","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":694,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Metacognition; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Intuition; Metamemory; Feeling; Task (project management); Fluency; Cognition; Social psychology; Cognitive science; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.511818764827479,"score_gpt":0.4999096014207356,"score_spread":0.011909163406743417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143177887","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72040075,0.009094723,0.19194596,0.012025007,0.0002334109,0.00008863394,0.0003204982,0.00020960266,0.06568129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834241,0.0011784504,0.013763351,0.0002744688,0.000058897967,0.00003673953,0.00008061653,0.000014753673,0.0011685361],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981729,0.00088819844,0.00010645108,0.00030587954,0.0003763703,0.00015021462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9687846,0.024444394,0.002759623,0.002119341,0.0011099788,0.00078215904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005045661,0.0005463096,0.00066658575,0.0013776624,0.00043773293,0.0047512366,0.00081926543,0.001663237,0.0048528765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031285293,0.0004101506,0.0006891224,0.00084420986,0.004163102,0.0062727043,0.0014403379,0.0019537357,0.0003130596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009838629,0.0006468494,0.033016253,0.00086101773,0.0006877705,0.00019344459,0.0020202873,0.026927575,0.0026836335,0.7949695,0.0025083858,0.1345014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003942945,0.000041017895,0.0068531833,0.000047722875,0.000048646074,0.000067055116,0.00012758948,0.010102239,0.00041218745,0.98136306,0.0008678517,0.000029890341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014519292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013987821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005045661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010089384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00135648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026684344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143191307","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.07.002","title":"The relations between children’s communicative perspective-taking and executive functioning","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":285,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Psychology; Comprehension; Perspective-taking; Inhibitory control; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Flexibility (engineering); Cognitive flexibility; Task (project management); Executive functions; Control (management); Developmental psychology; Working memory; Linguistics; Social psychology; Empathy; Computer science","score_opus":0.05796548876664552,"score_gpt":0.36023069516105316,"score_spread":0.3022652063944076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143191307","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967282,0.00023208855,0.00008938591,0.000060288447,0.0000038284575,0.000002295144,0.00007543376,0.000006753064,0.0028017848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999,0.0002122658,0.00024484567,0.000017967586,0.000004760242,0.000009074677,0.00008979006,0.000009163277,0.0004121126],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999074,0.00023519684,0.000088045104,0.00017420217,0.00029267423,0.0001359177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98203826,0.011010006,0.004062746,0.0008987438,0.0010242963,0.00096598396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019251353,0.00048715237,0.00030924776,0.0012580252,0.00040027342,0.0022537722,0.0003859898,0.00066022534,0.0032461453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014293176,0.00042153575,0.00034316338,0.0007734969,0.0012209284,0.0010048595,0.00076937396,0.0012204517,0.00032074412],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048785636,0.00023919021,0.94591886,0.000119998,0.00018681114,0.0016158965,0.008619097,0.00074277027,0.019601027,0.0022071432,0.00034567318,0.019915618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000920655,0.00007782832,0.9959998,0.000016926544,0.000033446224,0.00045040587,0.0010457346,0.00019593579,0.0013305031,0.00057311065,0.00025668397,0.0000105242625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047129714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006913267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047129714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062883046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073248526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010859489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145539134","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.05.003","title":"Infants’ categorization of novel objects with more or less obvious features","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Animacy; Categorization; Object (grammar); Perception; Basis (linear algebra); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Communication; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Mathematics; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.03835209384245323,"score_gpt":0.35510436653465227,"score_spread":0.316752272692199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145539134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.992297,0.00009756929,0.0012123308,0.000055806,0.00002793411,0.000006641688,0.000034970024,0.000026354151,0.0062414077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99489176,0.00012393745,0.0014844644,0.00006557676,0.000008185764,0.000015937618,0.00011701332,0.000048081194,0.0032450212],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951947,0.000066404646,0.00002321886,0.00011537908,0.00020780439,0.00006773259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99676704,0.0017286952,0.0005132391,0.0003422128,0.0004633003,0.00018559648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090457086,0.00019896617,0.00027524892,0.00022135075,0.00015823224,0.0009604169,0.00033407693,0.0007790215,0.003037347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008396549,0.00037179125,0.00022306452,0.00015143187,0.0005148378,0.0010730932,0.0006214816,0.00096338807,0.0005133163],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007589096,0.00013913927,0.0534542,0.000305428,0.00007266675,0.0009843366,0.008624751,0.00059907214,0.8807131,0.0041997456,0.0013869896,0.048761733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007564133,0.0007048745,0.8238698,0.00015483057,0.00015501984,0.003511277,0.0068425,0.007639784,0.1433689,0.004458094,0.009119293,0.000099954595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014914044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021853258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003037347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023711789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023817559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010160863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166622580","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2014.06.003","title":"Win-Stay, Lose-Sample: A simple sequential algorithm for approximating Bayesian inference","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":134,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Bayesian inference; Inference; Bayesian probability; Causal inference; Simple (philosophy); Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Bayesian statistics; Computer science; Sample (material); Cognition; Bayesian network; Algorithm; Psychology; Mathematics; Econometrics","score_opus":0.04510515411885032,"score_gpt":0.3822291281749095,"score_spread":0.3371239740560592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166622580","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003756988,0.00010523417,0.9947242,0.00013061005,0.000048957805,0.00011836242,0.000054676308,0.0007004036,0.00036047687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06881392,0.00011936352,0.9277285,0.00017972343,0.00011334528,0.00048224445,0.0003009781,0.00036236778,0.0018996713],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99648166,0.0016802368,0.0002768281,0.00049512164,0.00079296745,0.00027330546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9800223,0.01558526,0.00046142293,0.0017558165,0.0014217856,0.0007532699],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0135282865,0.0019778975,0.0033072962,0.002160296,0.0015760387,0.0027223665,0.006661553,0.0041752593,0.014146513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047497462,0.0024071834,0.0017160821,0.00252259,0.002517818,0.0055940985,0.004590021,0.0057355957,0.0024102437],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018846483,0.0004737549,0.0036205475,0.0003148389,0.00034080126,0.00023797847,0.00040324946,0.4864162,0.0025528925,0.07894986,0.010049982,0.41475528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014696621,0.00005129255,0.00012497984,0.000016522381,0.000028477387,0.000041191262,0.00001761155,0.971798,0.0005322314,0.026392344,0.00083330896,0.000017019567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014913347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026904875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014913347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025507475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057255267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0715453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168614750","doi":"10.1016/s0010-0285(02)00005-1","title":"Developments in young infants' reasoning about occluded objects","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":155,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development","keywords":"Object (grammar); Object permanence; Cognitive development; Psychology; Occlusion; Event (particle physics); Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Cognition; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Medicine","score_opus":0.031350210968495516,"score_gpt":0.3346793893219285,"score_spread":0.303329178353433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168614750","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98904186,0.00086936826,0.0010667153,0.0001564701,0.000024759194,0.000010135873,0.0002937933,0.000055335266,0.008481582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99163955,0.0014363269,0.0020291447,0.000052344403,0.000017284101,0.000035748042,0.00032889404,0.000046786052,0.004414115],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996762,0.000036722613,0.000025438176,0.0000777575,0.0001295844,0.000054382654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971718,0.0012358401,0.0005780388,0.00017964569,0.00052907737,0.0003055212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007207367,0.00029300526,0.0003423855,0.0010156778,0.00036272005,0.0017637643,0.00044147865,0.0007774631,0.0041620997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037518172,0.0004427867,0.00023330908,0.00043373465,0.000925042,0.0013903838,0.00069221045,0.0012209383,0.00085923617],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001669961,0.0009852996,0.16175522,0.00062258565,0.00011165818,0.008436805,0.014224203,0.0013904859,0.62569374,0.019706475,0.0027111077,0.16269258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031641914,0.0007375535,0.89557374,0.0001400924,0.00009028301,0.0051831924,0.0026124753,0.0014564923,0.075681515,0.005155976,0.01328974,0.0000473409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002528279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033574672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0041620997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048249683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005620959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013923645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2460541753","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.06.003","title":"Numerical morphology supports early number word learning: Evidence from a comparison of young Mandarin and English learners","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Institutes of Health; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Mandarin Chinese; Plural; Meaning (existential); Linguistics; Psychology; Word (group theory); Language acquisition; Noun; Philosophy","score_opus":0.053593565919583315,"score_gpt":0.37936824155538323,"score_spread":0.3257746756357999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2460541753","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980965,0.00006959667,0.000071222916,0.00002504116,0.0000027315868,0.0000026587156,0.00003336766,0.0000033454537,0.00169551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986181,0.000116828895,0.00021180659,0.000028075992,0.0000032314574,0.0000060507086,0.000060347258,0.0000081087355,0.00094749255],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996716,0.000058800444,0.000030532683,0.00008124125,0.00011824343,0.000039682956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952674,0.0025341231,0.00088748237,0.00021550135,0.00072851457,0.00036707937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086238876,0.00025124403,0.00033075918,0.0006517473,0.0004308433,0.001513782,0.00042958016,0.0005552788,0.005617892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005493527,0.00027501574,0.0001476373,0.0003891601,0.0009282381,0.0012093529,0.00071205606,0.00051084143,0.00099426],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0038005696,0.0010362422,0.5912716,0.00061977096,0.00013940944,0.0048000948,0.028569547,0.00035011553,0.29246792,0.0038809606,0.00067771866,0.07238597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059234575,0.00085260667,0.9700275,0.00004876943,0.00009043132,0.001960768,0.005219008,0.00042006752,0.017633025,0.0014847129,0.0021719565,0.000031809108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032312907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048320945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005617892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002477664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057102035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018793702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2549527009","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.11.002","title":"To infinity and beyond: Children generalize the successor function to all possible numbers years after learning to count","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; James S. McDonnell Foundation","keywords":"Successor cardinal; Function (biology); Concept learning; Psychology; Mathematics; Arithmetic; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.025891895629875625,"score_gpt":0.33451480186453275,"score_spread":0.3086229062346571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2549527009","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945363,0.00010970488,0.001024102,0.00014138901,0.000025255595,0.0000085227675,0.00008915279,0.000045703153,0.004019951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948317,0.00022400002,0.001467436,0.000080186095,0.0000073616898,0.00002319508,0.00015672135,0.000025389174,0.0031839693],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995647,0.000054967844,0.000031355867,0.0001302039,0.00015204184,0.00006667253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968265,0.0010446621,0.0008454757,0.0006594969,0.00031749607,0.0003063176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013587595,0.0006042453,0.0005756867,0.0006757681,0.00034127294,0.0017933421,0.0006959888,0.00077395886,0.004824272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073783556,0.00042787733,0.0003982203,0.00041041736,0.002089803,0.0033630035,0.0013122682,0.0020401108,0.00079250627],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032868853,0.005567651,0.34300783,0.0007542055,0.00035659462,0.009279051,0.053123087,0.014431365,0.12609483,0.09998549,0.012444588,0.3316684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036187604,0.0046484023,0.66301006,0.0005602959,0.00050302304,0.007703221,0.0157771,0.011135628,0.055869665,0.20604967,0.034014832,0.00036623774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025430263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028353527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004824272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031394733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092038687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016138852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767118421","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.09.001","title":"Enabling spontaneous analogy through heuristic change","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Heuristic; Constraint (computer-aided design); Analogical reasoning; Transfer of learning; Transfer (computing); Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Mathematics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.14086271268605213,"score_gpt":0.42381001370908306,"score_spread":0.2829473010230309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767118421","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49078166,0.0001969147,0.44855234,0.0008056243,0.0001345413,0.00010960613,0.00012804921,0.0019424518,0.05734879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.960175,0.000054457894,0.037792455,0.000059709193,0.000012353645,0.000033488774,0.00007432034,0.00010129877,0.0016968737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985709,0.00054620317,0.00006671845,0.00031139088,0.00038274418,0.00012209927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914622,0.0053599332,0.00047221128,0.0021483912,0.0002915887,0.0002656921],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014011846,0.0002950913,0.00031815813,0.00045140935,0.0004101723,0.0018012767,0.0013050498,0.0009846775,0.00721576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015612898,0.00041792748,0.00039170388,0.00041913133,0.0016283194,0.004810844,0.002431801,0.0017378093,0.00072712963],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037146322,0.00067206705,0.0071875923,0.00035099534,0.000082972234,0.00082502916,0.0032377574,0.019808115,0.06902587,0.72267264,0.002236181,0.17352925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007518167,0.00018836539,0.0038417983,0.0000396415,0.000049301398,0.0005658782,0.00075724703,0.106784746,0.02618306,0.85147506,0.009991087,0.000048598373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002936882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036190992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00721576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030939106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005809089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024139166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789247124","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.12.003","title":"Planning to speak in L1 and L2","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Encoding (memory); Sentence; Utterance; Linguistics; Psychology; Verb; Computer science; Communication; Natural language processing; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.09228624685077182,"score_gpt":0.4385164497824907,"score_spread":0.3462302029317189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789247124","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99005765,0.00012289052,0.0012315273,0.00015489518,0.000014188431,0.000015983669,0.00009545482,0.00003030571,0.008277153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965103,0.000067732995,0.00074384006,0.00007029334,0.0000045014663,0.000027042872,0.00012652765,0.000022101027,0.002427527],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999569,0.00010617385,0.000021039361,0.00011899484,0.00007720564,0.00010754574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980969,0.0010209004,0.00032181919,0.0001422635,0.00011919639,0.00029887282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066586287,0.00032648808,0.0002747306,0.0003421507,0.00046517004,0.0020839581,0.00035814373,0.00076285854,0.0044963514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005485779,0.00038287402,0.0002479687,0.00022209829,0.0011111478,0.0015756681,0.0009121417,0.0011598732,0.0006439003],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009963158,0.0017717507,0.24060465,0.00074135105,0.00020121467,0.0041616717,0.04813332,0.009550845,0.39456218,0.064794786,0.0038514507,0.22166362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057990337,0.0022683435,0.7811321,0.00020358426,0.0001930945,0.003765259,0.020965828,0.022795677,0.0514968,0.10761927,0.0086983405,0.00028184717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008814658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009928461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008814658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007566412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012744556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017526686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908121483","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2018.12.002","title":"Relations between numerical, spatial, and executive function skills and mathematics achievement: A latent-variable approach","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":150,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Western University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Latent variable; Structural equation modeling; Spatial ability; Mediation; Confirmatory factor analysis; Set (abstract data type); Test (biology); Spatial relation; Mathematics; Mathematics education; Psychology; Cognition; Computer science; Statistics; Biology; Geometry","score_opus":0.028210386717824863,"score_gpt":0.30485096655105554,"score_spread":0.27664057983323065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908121483","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949121,0.00010819779,0.0037799403,0.00019625993,0.000012485292,0.000020393067,0.00029566698,0.00003218119,0.00064287207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99774086,0.000058094225,0.0012906983,0.000014843886,0.0000114388195,0.000048506223,0.0003733666,0.0000112920625,0.00045095317],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974281,0.0014043303,0.00012860051,0.00047656105,0.00029611663,0.00026627086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99235535,0.004502475,0.0011977608,0.0010166407,0.00036010644,0.00056764454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042387666,0.0010542243,0.0006385113,0.0016587117,0.0009732775,0.00213508,0.0012032992,0.0010770767,0.005331414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00885147,0.0006216167,0.0017200443,0.0018706288,0.0014074751,0.0014142104,0.0016796435,0.0021695339,0.00048750124],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003119921,0.00094400713,0.98714024,0.000017588975,0.00066184334,0.000058149413,0.0005221363,0.0017188082,0.00069405674,0.002551176,0.00020941287,0.0051704985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057060486,0.00034300442,0.9709391,0.00002880021,0.0003609947,0.00011151218,0.00081755716,0.020679884,0.0004530682,0.0057970723,0.0003750716,0.000036936424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010803415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074862265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010803415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075398554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017320326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022417009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951513593","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.11.002","title":"Compositional inductive biases in function learning","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Cognitive Science and Education Research","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Companhia Brasileira de Metalurgia e Mineração; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Principle of compositionality; Inductive bias; Computer science; Predictability; Artificial intelligence; Property (philosophy); Cognition; Prior probability; Numerosity adaptation effect; Natural language processing; Machine learning; Cognitive psychology; Bayesian probability; Multi-task learning; Psychology; Mathematics; Statistics; Task (project management)","score_opus":0.3245244709197464,"score_gpt":0.5116112390370984,"score_spread":0.18708676811735198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951513593","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47456655,0.0005412526,0.43344292,0.0024849467,0.0001611731,0.000066272885,0.0001634489,0.00054613693,0.08802731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97034764,0.00012662743,0.026129367,0.00023244949,0.000087302586,0.00003417837,0.00010292734,0.000109228604,0.0028301526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99761283,0.0007837594,0.00012355333,0.00043569627,0.0008146296,0.00022954096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98443156,0.010142901,0.00088384893,0.0026190975,0.001486554,0.00043605003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042665224,0.00038129208,0.00045239992,0.00072100054,0.00075376686,0.0027255917,0.001325059,0.0011241474,0.007457233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033795796,0.00042899352,0.0006594964,0.000555047,0.0035837386,0.007995858,0.0028388763,0.0021046505,0.0006735441],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025301758,0.00010730617,0.0072154044,0.00016773035,0.000071255694,0.00016365126,0.0015816127,0.004577338,0.009069234,0.89102185,0.0008147849,0.08495682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002180216,0.00003671164,0.003833596,0.00002364006,0.000028472201,0.00014581485,0.0002457665,0.010802806,0.0055701016,0.9770708,0.0022049486,0.000015633203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000516105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006723807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007457233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009469295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076160044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024946928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205792376","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2021.101441","title":"Distributional social semantics: Inferring word meanings from communication patterns","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Language and cultural evolution","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Semantics (computer science); Meaning (existential); Natural language processing; Computer science; Word (group theory); Linguistics; Distributional semantics; Artificial intelligence; Lexical semantics; Word lists by frequency; Lexical item; Psychology; Semantic similarity; Sentence","score_opus":0.04501003298091999,"score_gpt":0.39004370293095797,"score_spread":0.345033669950038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205792376","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55531526,0.0007426577,0.42885855,0.0015606902,0.00015889462,0.00012495424,0.0014666661,0.0012508224,0.010521656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9415645,0.00023449294,0.05646848,0.00007548917,0.00006656759,0.00006766522,0.0008175652,0.00013634482,0.00056899764],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897635,0.0004570984,0.00007119493,0.00030875098,0.00012917804,0.000057363362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908742,0.00696923,0.00071568013,0.000666663,0.00053506123,0.0002391499],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001607123,0.00061773474,0.0005083915,0.00353697,0.0008611099,0.0028084046,0.0009819159,0.0011839714,0.0034528933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019416515,0.00053781515,0.00088474416,0.002766997,0.0018984429,0.008559548,0.0021728904,0.0013712125,0.0008205312],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011023576,0.0007633741,0.099591315,0.00091075007,0.00049228646,0.0009982957,0.009962064,0.016576815,0.048968147,0.1523326,0.0074836537,0.6608183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000099513934,0.00014323175,0.042144332,0.00012743792,0.00023693066,0.0009059322,0.003700889,0.24540986,0.008026352,0.69424385,0.00484126,0.00012043415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022926026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021472618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00353697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006734023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006899323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011551082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216246799","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2021.101443","title":"Hypothesis testing, attention, and ‘Same’-‘Different’ judgments","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Intuition; Converse; Psychology; Stimulus (psychology); Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Perception; Set (abstract data type); Social psychology; Computer science; Mathematics; Cognitive science","score_opus":0.3584158466734584,"score_gpt":0.4618216681543257,"score_spread":0.1034058214808673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3216246799","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91023725,0.0019642352,0.06974334,0.0045048143,0.00030391567,0.00012506358,0.00005735419,0.00021816012,0.012845855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883555,0.00016288356,0.010322828,0.00044111742,0.000104486746,0.00005674348,0.000027441814,0.000022503466,0.0005064765],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9859491,0.010284768,0.00044030976,0.0016333021,0.0013101416,0.00038235896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80721194,0.17832388,0.0076931156,0.003372995,0.0016629108,0.0017352244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027141556,0.00046552822,0.00080037565,0.0015640008,0.0008758841,0.002592837,0.0015441013,0.0015175244,0.0037623493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09235425,0.00034716143,0.0007652277,0.0009150391,0.0071575656,0.0037046382,0.0015236347,0.0018993394,0.00017824105],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0067151184,0.0018631833,0.18988006,0.0016573708,0.0012582432,0.002946524,0.0063458155,0.011970895,0.0386256,0.31019536,0.003612383,0.4249294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051094906,0.0015265064,0.1344999,0.00010205336,0.00024680022,0.00090599415,0.0011429037,0.047559176,0.01252672,0.79841936,0.0024577335,0.00010201405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017976031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013214584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027141556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015778308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015155078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14353997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311090216","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2022.101530","title":"Evidence for abstract representations in children but not capuchin monkeys","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"H2020 European Research Council; Horizon 2020; European Research Council; European Commission; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Horizon 2020 Framework Programme","keywords":"Container (type theory); Test (biology); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; A priori and a posteriori; Sample (material); Developmental psychology; Item response theory; Type (biology); Computer science; Psychometrics; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.12703347230149345,"score_gpt":0.4328558121151719,"score_spread":0.30582233981367846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311090216","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955558,0.0003755167,0.00048266508,0.0002743095,0.00001631858,0.0000061397227,0.00013915561,0.000053233853,0.0030968182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99737585,0.00039440164,0.0011712278,0.00017056587,0.00001133438,0.000033194352,0.00018245408,0.00002674284,0.0006342826],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878746,0.00016504212,0.00013104994,0.00040549762,0.00033199883,0.00017898827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888159,0.003614329,0.0037219082,0.001990051,0.0010431468,0.00081459247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00179958,0.0009199138,0.0006690855,0.0014018607,0.00058285554,0.0018623557,0.00077585294,0.0017557649,0.0061990796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007669989,0.0006522329,0.00045940245,0.0006719832,0.0035528115,0.0021235966,0.0015118928,0.0017366201,0.0009466927],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013747349,0.0005447869,0.5897052,0.0012727716,0.000296913,0.01089434,0.030187698,0.00061896857,0.28500733,0.008177416,0.002714139,0.069205634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005909723,0.0008323137,0.94577914,0.00017181333,0.00015312817,0.009721119,0.004253198,0.00079757767,0.02283654,0.0069155283,0.008392341,0.000088172936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002871273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003642443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061990796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004529106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004639894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020738006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319778131","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2023.101551","title":"Probability and intentional action","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Odds; Attribution; Intentionality; Psychology; Action (physics); Raising (metalworking); Social psychology; Affect (linguistics); Outcome (game theory); Odds ratio; Cognitive psychology; Logistic regression; Communication; Statistics; Economics; Mathematics; Epistemology; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.391519180613027,"score_gpt":0.4056783275995199,"score_spread":0.014159146986492899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319778131","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15068302,0.018213747,0.33933637,0.032169495,0.0010299742,0.00007000405,0.0002962557,0.00029140466,0.4579098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97777164,0.0022013404,0.012496982,0.0005451481,0.0003564781,0.0000375212,0.0000623478,0.00004668298,0.006482007],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985989,0.0006049739,0.000057362635,0.00028972645,0.00033418273,0.00011490085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99418855,0.004269028,0.00042076214,0.00043516853,0.00040027962,0.0002862584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023302054,0.0004409941,0.00042090387,0.001210631,0.0010067367,0.00535028,0.000881904,0.0021473314,0.0075919097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01169861,0.0003660008,0.0005682969,0.00071847875,0.0094999345,0.006459868,0.0010763602,0.001980413,0.0005999897],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016640173,0.000015765572,0.00047731947,0.00003413938,0.000016943273,0.00004299478,0.00050048414,0.00080063456,0.00031325265,0.9894928,0.0007601886,0.0075287796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056986405,0.000006706819,0.00091634906,0.000012090698,0.0000057217576,0.000054837772,0.00007869807,0.0010681326,0.000099899815,0.99535525,0.0023902627,0.0000062908493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002561358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001697425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075919097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014608136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001008838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02539742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403170673","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2024.101692","title":"Doing things efficiently: Testing an account of why simple explanations are satisfying","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Simple (philosophy); Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Computer science; Cognitive science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1290349402824772,"score_gpt":0.3388383257714088,"score_spread":0.20980338548893163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403170673","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96871156,0.0003876871,0.0145355705,0.0010665266,0.00003639228,0.00011725769,0.00015594353,0.000052202966,0.014936966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994021,0.000072310824,0.005303209,0.0001458037,0.0000125402385,0.000043439468,0.00008084153,0.000012946306,0.00030784533],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966535,0.0017871072,0.00030740918,0.0005183762,0.000540501,0.00019327393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9146107,0.066949256,0.007957296,0.0068902206,0.0028376472,0.0007549309],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0084660845,0.00045856964,0.0003176938,0.00089143077,0.00051389966,0.0020895465,0.00072563195,0.0017602436,0.0070066247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056551848,0.00030021308,0.00076073944,0.0005679747,0.002060093,0.0048668883,0.0012604455,0.0010264453,0.00038002583],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007049595,0.0021208427,0.4524161,0.003624862,0.0009993198,0.0013373813,0.040225085,0.009895948,0.034843437,0.19172694,0.0041173114,0.2516432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018641965,0.003803015,0.52232856,0.0005107881,0.00085978763,0.0019747806,0.017141022,0.077218555,0.012760142,0.34257624,0.018638486,0.00032446298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008445555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009722002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0084660845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056675926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042058807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04477346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412023428","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2026.101799","title":"A Single Process for Deductive and Inductive Inference? Examining the Impact of Conclusion Typicality and Argument Validity on Immediate Inferences","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Macquarie University","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Inference; Inductive reasoning; Deductive reasoning; Process (computing); Computer science; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Medicine; Programming language","score_opus":0.25360145600071315,"score_gpt":0.5130505106296117,"score_spread":0.25944905462889856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412023428","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9599938,0.00040160384,0.027351644,0.000647053,0.000043049844,0.00017046984,0.00006495672,0.00013641137,0.011191083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99035853,0.00009586532,0.009015518,0.00011079329,0.000013424957,0.00006068349,0.000059844984,0.000047806225,0.00023749215],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9777674,0.010657579,0.0012878574,0.0040036663,0.00530364,0.0009797922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.76222473,0.18075609,0.019282058,0.026551139,0.006352633,0.0048334016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04008112,0.0005265689,0.0010481512,0.0019546659,0.0011482593,0.0047417893,0.0016380551,0.0015393917,0.004609025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17741513,0.001209421,0.0010130014,0.0006884033,0.0062245983,0.0127313,0.004640804,0.0031418696,0.00056311255],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009189039,0.0028458864,0.34955657,0.002385552,0.0011252158,0.00074347295,0.034842506,0.004993384,0.14124879,0.09755634,0.00085177796,0.35466155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009164075,0.002002967,0.5987731,0.0005297709,0.00077287015,0.0017936348,0.011711082,0.04787905,0.057658862,0.27384472,0.0036907792,0.00042671117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011761565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009810489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04008112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013941015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021495658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21197182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W621487820","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.05.001","title":"What makes us think? A three-stage dual-process model of analytic engagement","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":483,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Cued speech; Decoupling (probability); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.5084308370774361,"score_gpt":0.5253165416008257,"score_spread":0.016885704523389666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W621487820","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15296686,0.00042757005,0.7911436,0.0052163834,0.00011043125,0.00030922305,0.00018542231,0.00020513772,0.049435403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91438764,0.00024078405,0.07734915,0.00018850468,0.000044706198,0.0002703833,0.00007532522,0.00004041157,0.0074031004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971112,0.0014323393,0.00009887571,0.00042385096,0.00056100363,0.0003726598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925574,0.0050734933,0.00048420753,0.00054335623,0.00071646733,0.0006250605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043286094,0.00071172905,0.00085726613,0.0012862233,0.0011788129,0.0062212483,0.0028324558,0.002962026,0.010048194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017004166,0.00090289215,0.0015626671,0.001071568,0.003511375,0.007815541,0.0026147955,0.0025190555,0.0014332271],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002762726,0.00026143095,0.0033240388,0.00012298797,0.00008120315,0.00026652266,0.0037077821,0.029353302,0.0028346768,0.9382561,0.0009018688,0.020613855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007387594,0.00007740619,0.0010862976,0.00003259362,0.000050433962,0.000117352196,0.0004967098,0.34253797,0.0005621115,0.6538216,0.0010971478,0.0000464751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041289357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018977174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010048194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018927329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024844774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033614516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}