{"meta":{"query_hash":"58c91c88d6fc","filters":{"venue":"Columbia Journal of Gender and Law"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/58c91c88d6fc","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Columbia+Journal+of+Gender+and+Law"},"results":[{"id":"W3146045954","doi":"10.52214/cjgl.v40i2.8064","title":"The Role of the State in the Intra-Group Vulnerability of Women: Revisiting Debates About Multiculturalism Through the Case of Polygamy Among the Bedouins in Israel","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Columbia Journal of Gender and Law","topic":"Marriage and Sexual Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Vulnerability (computing); State (computer science); Law; Political science; Group (periodic table); Sociology; Gender studies; Chemistry","score_opus":0.02497077345915302,"score_gpt":0.2982037086437928,"score_spread":0.2732329351846398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3146045954","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89719987,0.00060815376,0.0010837162,0.027170608,0.0000644149,0.000021560738,0.0000122934825,0.00000347754,0.07383594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989434,0.00007542965,0.000046648824,0.0004347243,0.000012729506,0.0000035892724,0.0000011498433,0.0000017061153,0.00048073265],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958903,0.0025697548,0.000061911865,0.00022999848,0.00022209776,0.0010259311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99259746,0.0056431172,0.00055776257,0.00027087348,0.00042872148,0.00050201715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008038563,0.00025264686,0.00039945028,0.001213236,0.017292395,0.0074189105,0.001813129,0.0047697145,0.0036827615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0086183585,0.00027507212,0.00024569535,0.0008422598,0.048169818,0.005482903,0.008488794,0.005429033,0.000113625705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003929402,0.000054264703,0.012867353,0.000028522443,0.000011545163,0.0017145373,0.67435193,0.0001325526,0.0003368847,0.30166316,0.000839573,0.007960437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014965074,0.00003586656,0.008828868,0.00018849742,0.000020589245,0.0005502377,0.90985703,0.00045983863,0.00036183133,0.06465626,0.015001263,0.000024721872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045969296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07746508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045969296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063116336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062730876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.091403484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283389515","doi":"10.52214/cjgl.v42i2.9046","title":"Constitutionalizing Women’s Equality in India: Assessing the Sabarimala Decision","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Columbia Journal of Gender and Law","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Constitutional right; Sociology; Citizenship; Oppression; Political science; Scrutiny; Economic Justice; Constitutional court; Equal Protection Clause; Gender studies; Constitution; Politics","score_opus":0.05529849587540203,"score_gpt":0.36494462557340585,"score_spread":0.3096461296980038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283389515","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44857198,0.0050480394,0.0018103818,0.07747936,0.00042585848,0.00015723536,0.00009473518,0.000034123204,0.46637833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99003524,0.0007157086,0.0003518931,0.0056007258,0.00008907821,0.000052661308,0.000020312757,0.000007895961,0.003126412],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98046255,0.00739521,0.00053645263,0.0008887795,0.0050255544,0.00569145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98555404,0.010081355,0.0009420472,0.0007065482,0.0015781935,0.0011378506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013888502,0.0005089629,0.00042604454,0.0032098151,0.022234527,0.01791731,0.0026938142,0.005147768,0.0025898828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020300208,0.00049191614,0.0006907696,0.004119005,0.042432223,0.006942049,0.017190931,0.010417016,0.00024050272],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000345671,0.000063648695,0.0052593704,0.00011659135,0.000018271257,0.0006168241,0.100048155,0.00032384016,0.00038775377,0.8762689,0.0029514104,0.01391073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006326597,0.0003780051,0.051331963,0.0014116684,0.00020492091,0.0009530852,0.40133548,0.0010426595,0.0028164214,0.2728259,0.26736864,0.00026793432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07623257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10824134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07623257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026667757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024543634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19348902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412183471","doi":"10.52214/cjgl.v46i1.14067","title":"To Prison, With Mom: International Due Process Issues for Children and Mothers Posed by Prison Nurseries","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Columbia Journal of Gender and Law","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Criminology; Law; Political science; Prison reform; Process (computing); Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.014585215390178008,"score_gpt":0.3201064144995874,"score_spread":0.3055211991094094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412183471","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37705547,0.017400706,0.006817686,0.41429397,0.002148608,0.00025520037,0.00007468984,0.000058383805,0.18189524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96993893,0.0037858672,0.0018519323,0.016299086,0.0003794057,0.00014314764,0.00001659971,0.000036269754,0.007548835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96982306,0.02140277,0.0014071029,0.0013561955,0.0021620386,0.0038487776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95288295,0.03567259,0.0048883585,0.0017739665,0.0019434998,0.0028386484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04662944,0.00033795976,0.00046456052,0.001077695,0.0188295,0.011598045,0.0019797988,0.0062539834,0.0051074573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09478803,0.000370079,0.0006637669,0.0010267509,0.015949674,0.008785211,0.009188348,0.008763496,0.00027851673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008683102,0.000066046654,0.031994615,0.00021209981,0.000034904693,0.0070403926,0.32793072,0.00027645048,0.00027731975,0.5374849,0.026425103,0.06817072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036651203,0.00012464872,0.025924064,0.0030778258,0.00007107834,0.005893273,0.64217675,0.0007097616,0.0007972951,0.08202784,0.23903811,0.00012270757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027849916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053011067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04662944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011663236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01748826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24660301},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}