{"meta":{"query_hash":"58c91c88d6fc","filters":{"venue":"Columbia Journal of Gender and Law"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/58c91c88d6fc","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Columbia+Journal+of+Gender+and+Law"},"results":[{"id":"W3146045954","doi":"10.52214/cjgl.v40i2.8064","title":"The Role of the State in the Intra-Group Vulnerability of Women: Revisiting Debates About Multiculturalism Through the Case of Polygamy Among the Bedouins in Israel","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Columbia Journal of Gender and Law","topic":"Marriage and Sexual Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Vulnerability (computing); State (computer science); Law; Political science; Group (periodic table); Sociology; Gender studies; Chemistry","score_opus":0.02497077345915302,"score_gpt":0.2982037086437928,"score_spread":0.2732329351846398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3146045954","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99223685,0.0038914462,0.000006394374,0.0012058512,0.00009067934,0.00023623342,0.000008030628,0.0000011214044,0.0023233867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99914616,0.00045418914,0.000016474538,0.00022209724,0.000073808136,0.0000063114153,3.1499272e-7,0.000003799965,0.00007683426],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99662805,0.0020921894,0.0006286892,0.000096020514,0.00032575193,0.000229298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969851,0.0020223216,0.00046954345,0.00023775696,0.0002485227,0.0000368041],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048751375,0.00007325603,0.00021967787,0.000010450395,0.0007956481,0.00014633902,0.0004035454,0.000054630527,0.000035048142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011375488,0.0000333939,0.00010163143,0.00039285357,0.00092538254,0.00019164504,0.00007328365,0.00045160574,7.414245e-8],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048936723,0.00014452869,0.117007,0.000055299326,0.0001089535,0.00004725258,0.8338645,0.00019229748,0.000624641,0.037499495,0.000108455104,0.010298626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047159666,0.000049576858,0.1638859,0.000094862975,0.000048398793,0.00007630625,0.79250664,0.00017345544,0.00026599926,0.039250147,0.0030921611,0.00008494019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04358583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20425801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16067219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005949842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012658094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96278304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283389515","doi":"10.52214/cjgl.v42i2.9046","title":"Constitutionalizing Women’s Equality in India: Assessing the Sabarimala Decision","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Columbia Journal of Gender and Law","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Constitutional right; Sociology; Citizenship; Oppression; Political science; Scrutiny; Economic Justice; Constitutional court; Equal Protection Clause; Gender studies; Constitution; Politics","score_opus":0.05529849587540203,"score_gpt":0.36494462557340585,"score_spread":0.3096461296980038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283389515","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.942733,0.0006881208,0.0003903587,0.00031712302,0.00050702866,0.00008484898,0.0000035677253,0.000003125448,0.055272818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99914134,0.000047708556,0.00011238477,0.0004924698,0.00010341145,0.0000046315904,4.8446753e-7,0.000002522473,0.000095055155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861753,0.00042700613,0.00025485214,0.00007532632,0.00044753493,0.00017775591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942285,0.00023168435,0.00014513009,0.000053212054,0.00006988196,0.00007725253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002778607,0.000034479912,0.00009919916,0.000039790644,0.0012661003,0.0002581614,0.00013296118,0.000025421023,0.00026217685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000088856475,0.000033199067,0.000037507198,0.00014337455,0.00025965768,0.00018542717,0.00007187856,0.00023314318,3.4885375e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002071502,0.00016375768,0.2139731,0.000014647148,0.00005109184,0.00005981315,0.08922204,0.00039322907,0.00014399373,0.6900961,0.0016215566,0.0042399606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083633827,0.000050892897,0.5227435,0.000015722846,0.000018805416,0.00010753754,0.22364932,0.000040731942,0.000007118733,0.18066682,0.07173778,0.00012543613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032112212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010232745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5094293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024076454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039673035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9737948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412183471","doi":"10.52214/cjgl.v46i1.14067","title":"To Prison, With Mom: International Due Process Issues for Children and Mothers Posed by Prison Nurseries","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Columbia Journal of Gender and Law","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Criminology; Law; Political science; Prison reform; Process (computing); Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.014585215390178008,"score_gpt":0.3201064144995874,"score_spread":0.3055211991094094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412183471","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9337234,0.0058645336,0.003465555,0.012177552,0.00075765996,0.0010092652,0.00006415393,0.00003415976,0.042903733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99355733,0.00018290411,0.0009893867,0.0011122187,0.00020841598,0.0000061027868,0.0000036633262,0.000008342708,0.0039316197],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992624,0.00004273214,0.00017924585,0.00013497839,0.00023308511,0.00014756419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942684,0.00004951102,0.00011088474,0.0000479507,0.00025470566,0.00011008488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039277296,0.000070195565,0.00017073966,0.000033237822,0.00035165538,0.00030272768,0.00016576269,0.00008144704,0.000036508027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006365885,0.00006890009,0.0000302879,0.00007613867,0.00029263718,0.00022968484,0.00001352858,0.00012486984,1.2250003e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013814751,0.00059750356,0.25131962,0.00027193796,0.0013807435,0.000010432382,0.28916723,0.000040617408,0.00038416966,0.117523916,0.31693283,0.02098954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00388324,0.0009289491,0.14440444,0.00029636815,0.0002502631,0.00005276078,0.059316494,0.000026529451,0.00055122987,0.028581996,0.7611234,0.0005843112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012000292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005053091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4441906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025511317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013775047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.291921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}