{"meta":{"query_hash":"e9e247888741","filters":{"venue":"Common Law World Review"},"cohort_total":46,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":46,"exported":46,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/e9e247888741","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Common+Law+World+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1965119976","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2011.40.2.0221","title":"The Taxation Exemption of Canadian Indians as Governments and Individuals: How Does This Compare with Australia and New Zealand?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Legislation; Politics; Political science; Scholarship; Indigenous rights; Mainstream; Public economics; Law and economics; Economic growth; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.06146543550668151,"score_gpt":0.311952177566374,"score_spread":0.2504867420596925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965119976","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6493355,0.04702691,0.0000012324002,0.019630399,0.00072535896,0.0038759476,0.00007665517,0.000048452654,0.27927953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74850076,0.21983391,0.00011699669,0.00027050992,0.00009347977,0.000007160311,0.000016710444,0.000008314365,0.031152144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989815,0.00024928828,0.00017652997,0.00012919493,0.0002242736,0.00023923151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991626,0.00006365728,0.0003107087,0.00015704262,0.000052176663,0.00025382353],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065313594,0.000091969494,0.00019285022,0.000054939523,0.0020833886,0.000063999345,0.00014710176,0.000036443842,0.00017396081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000051600637,0.000048898935,0.000018222927,0.00029275272,0.00029704682,0.00017477942,0.000002106697,0.00009639494,0.000007721233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007941935,0.000039581293,0.1759259,0.0005830291,0.00004345238,0.0000016095399,0.13592687,1.6455104e-8,2.1044575e-7,0.67372584,0.010201775,0.0035437827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081443584,0.00002742154,0.045519836,0.00081230537,0.00004552639,0.0000014752827,0.00057446706,4.089978e-8,0.000011144424,0.0012035705,0.9516415,0.000081285456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93752056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9993778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9414397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000090346904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012119736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970983722","doi":"10.1350/clwr.33.1.35.25831","title":"The Law in Undercover Policing: A Comparative Study of Entrapment and Covert Interviewing in Australia, Canada and Europe","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Covert; Entrapment; Interview; Law; Political science; Perspective (graphical); Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.13727744968855873,"score_gpt":0.4025959515357165,"score_spread":0.2653185018471578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970983722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92815644,0.05176073,3.493145e-7,0.007529308,0.00008160572,0.0009223752,0.0000018352558,0.000004838176,0.011542546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98389834,0.014888041,0.0000036368676,0.0009970346,0.000008360195,0.000011142539,3.163587e-7,0.0000027294645,0.00019041981],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877256,0.00037677246,0.00033583114,0.00013694569,0.00019441424,0.00018349115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948967,0.00021619904,0.000082130755,0.00012697944,0.00002531032,0.000059703125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007279835,0.00008899799,0.00032624148,0.000015824975,0.00016654546,0.00004251652,0.00016548972,0.000009958418,0.000011297139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018313276,0.000064160144,0.000015690937,0.00031661216,0.00022976192,0.00011326917,0.00007946812,0.0001280706,9.256021e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028297854,0.00032728878,0.040249586,0.0011577838,0.000033312754,0.000051834762,0.028541667,0.000036678397,0.0000077127015,0.92577064,0.0013280278,0.0024671722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001194809,0.00022224242,0.06376894,0.018366095,0.0001033993,0.000005028555,0.010909257,0.000002570312,0.00003909053,0.004675653,0.90031195,0.00040096132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9705096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.921095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014594875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008651078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26163748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973438824","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2013.42.3.0255","title":"An Empirical Analysis of Appeals by Class Members in Australia's Federal Class Actions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Class action; Supreme court; Class (philosophy); Political science; Law; State (computer science); Computer science","score_opus":0.06604056206683592,"score_gpt":0.3625630145899187,"score_spread":0.29652245252308274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973438824","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09403647,0.012499365,0.00019633734,0.044007428,0.0006288414,0.0022194493,0.000050530394,0.00037033728,0.84599125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873841,0.0013392458,0.000042484415,0.008322018,0.00009589882,0.000118264106,0.00024074987,0.000019343155,0.0024379236],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984223,0.00007245734,0.00065884157,0.0002899946,0.00025224246,0.0003041276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990087,0.000047375524,0.00030632594,0.00047424994,0.000116118994,0.000047229278],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002988728,0.00019965034,0.00068961043,0.0003821294,0.0001564471,0.00022856008,0.0003128701,0.000062342115,0.0052601174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001558638,0.00017658145,0.00032250411,0.0030123205,0.00010885946,0.0010996147,0.000073000876,0.00023350732,0.00033786095],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008571168,0.0009995607,0.05600467,0.0016714104,0.0005334383,0.0000032124308,0.0000105870495,0.0002980787,0.00018360233,0.25620264,0.6727483,0.011335891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016083929,0.000004754438,0.018796897,0.00039242307,0.0005656782,3.8759043e-7,0.000032695865,0.003456374,0.000004044477,0.00025621272,0.976126,0.00020366137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004760928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025748076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8933476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006671874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010751606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974073694","doi":"10.1350/clwr.34.1.1.60195","title":"Takeover Bid Transactions and Information Asymmetry: Assessment of the Efficiency of the Investment and Securities Act 1999","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shareholder; Legislature; Business; Database transaction; Information asymmetry; Legislation; Accounting; Tender offer; Investment (military); Value (mathematics); Inside information; Finance; Law; Corporate governance; Political science","score_opus":0.011740361548406464,"score_gpt":0.23193387340331723,"score_spread":0.22019351185491076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974073694","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26507717,0.37174317,0.0004094595,0.043589503,0.001205,0.0041949437,0.00009666496,0.00008719449,0.3135969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98509043,0.008420242,0.000033468335,0.006310953,0.00003371692,0.000013049835,0.000002096825,0.0000037364218,0.00009231623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993456,0.000020174235,0.0003135472,0.00006584755,0.00017949883,0.00007534135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992957,0.000030694227,0.0004013232,0.00022248921,0.00004423952,0.000005515006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024228048,0.00008811149,0.00018473533,0.000029152086,0.00013516544,0.00004191964,0.0001558618,0.0000149006655,0.000038509334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010411128,0.000050237813,0.00006575975,0.00042402803,0.00013909584,0.0008890353,0.000064063956,0.00009731801,0.0000014513403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005942672,0.00015818891,0.012234997,0.008921655,0.000037639893,1.4731923e-7,0.00008893413,0.000049497477,0.00005525658,0.9159299,0.005075678,0.057442147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016450726,0.0000044536732,0.04717656,0.0025303937,0.00009229824,8.8254995e-7,0.000011222365,0.00043560663,0.000115924064,0.0006759976,0.9487137,0.00007846125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024780753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010216654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.943638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014088576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016513437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20486386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988242259","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2006.35.3.197","title":"Occupiers' Liability in England and Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Liability; Legislature; Law; Tort; Position (finance); Political science; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.021784751265324344,"score_gpt":0.3100154524167192,"score_spread":0.2882307011513948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988242259","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14980672,0.36767134,0.000001328372,0.061982203,0.00040043413,0.0008886313,0.000010885247,0.000051543822,0.4191869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982519,0.0137471035,0.000028907925,0.0018689447,0.000086016094,0.000011848343,0.0000025634702,0.0000033060405,0.0017323114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990293,0.00022511759,0.00021659474,0.00015098574,0.00017968977,0.00019833537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999461,0.00023705751,0.000042433312,0.00016144756,0.000024987605,0.00007305186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083276373,0.00007230322,0.00023224729,0.000011693414,0.00018782036,0.000031044066,0.00014491589,0.000018118371,0.0001424278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006506651,0.00006320734,0.000025407184,0.00020242904,0.00019083271,0.00009654077,0.000034478795,0.000105051324,0.000004567125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008722341,0.00006089398,0.27370748,0.0021580863,0.0000036056801,0.000052656538,0.00033307527,0.0000013137037,0.0000017003174,0.6358126,0.060462017,0.027397849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053111624,0.0000028462641,0.013854634,0.0009246768,0.00001054633,4.9870323e-7,0.000011890091,6.2661536e-7,0.0000018039602,0.0024689897,0.9825898,0.00008061516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9778393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9221277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011707558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015202172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25775206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996598757","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2010.39.1.0191","title":"Special Issue on Being, Becoming and Belonging: Multiculturalism, Diversity and Social Inclusion in Modern Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Inclusion (mineral); Diversity (politics); Political science; Sociology; Cultural diversity; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.017360683680552946,"score_gpt":0.26079746287315947,"score_spread":0.24343677919260653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996598757","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6273537,0.021591797,1.6369e-7,0.07717783,0.002920819,0.0011099289,0.000036879024,0.000057279736,0.2697516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98038787,0.0066276044,0.000020542357,0.0060817236,0.0021158697,0.000004217224,0.000006647383,0.00000773942,0.0047477977],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992044,0.00009793825,0.0001339418,0.0001578423,0.00023096264,0.00017488924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967724,0.000057045094,0.000058067722,0.00007469193,0.000022099615,0.000110884335],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036421907,0.00007670124,0.00022153347,0.00007026685,0.005191481,0.00008478262,0.00016826957,0.000043257533,0.00024665453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029111376,0.000086640684,0.00002837732,0.00013796231,0.00032696337,0.0001332223,0.0007943131,0.0002662151,0.0000023350658],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001502768,0.00007595918,0.0076574897,0.0011513608,0.000018956058,0.000116590905,0.10242943,5.358318e-7,0.000019520894,0.24587204,0.25145227,0.39119083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011467539,0.0000023679556,0.0030047807,0.00028310894,0.000015848522,4.9967986e-7,0.00012660206,0.0000034334305,5.5999885e-7,0.0005353747,0.9958003,0.00011245703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98468846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99998236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74434805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037429083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011920678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99610364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998545607","doi":"10.1350/clwr.33.2.130.36494","title":"Re-Examining Public Policy—A Case for Conditional Fees in Singapore?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public policy; Political science; Law and economics; Common law; Law; Public administration; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.14089845902713205,"score_gpt":0.4197903388280506,"score_spread":0.27889187980091856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998545607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008156287,0.06042062,0.00050422875,0.40098536,0.00017247765,0.0034061891,0.00016967305,0.00024391276,0.52594125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881231,0.003464058,0.0006829318,0.0065246243,0.0002520961,0.0002549974,0.00006253405,0.000010680877,0.0006249761],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989912,0.00009656676,0.00030977215,0.00017873806,0.00014937278,0.00027435564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929965,0.0002011897,0.00010853485,0.0002054526,0.000063645275,0.000121542595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008288704,0.00008837481,0.00022518326,0.00006361727,0.0006282572,0.000097121934,0.00022470356,0.000032462343,0.00014768344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016146446,0.00008333075,0.00007639322,0.0006949823,0.00022321448,0.00022335515,0.00004894682,0.00012239968,0.000033618606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.925741e-7,0.000046396795,0.00019230561,0.00015081771,0.0000033659826,0.000015347414,0.00015667966,0.0000045772467,0.0000011318732,0.99362665,0.0016414821,0.004160769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018707677,0.000007950375,0.00015610737,0.0005224352,0.000010703027,0.000010097385,0.00011794605,0.0000020058521,0.0000044114627,0.050179403,0.94869375,0.00010808087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057100323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18579929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9799668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020433826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025345894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86318994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006854857","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2010.39.1.0193","title":"The Impact on the Inuit of Environmental Degradation to the Canadian Arctic","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Human settlement; Arctic; Environmental degradation; Government (linguistics); Environmental planning; Natural resource economics; Climate change; Geography; Population; Environmental protection; Biodiversity; Environmental resource management; Business; Economics; Ecology; Environmental health","score_opus":0.03890383994598605,"score_gpt":0.37198562794729545,"score_spread":0.3330817880013094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006854857","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3080393,0.044994418,6.240287e-7,0.4972484,0.0028894693,0.012176207,0.00023060605,0.00003216317,0.1343888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97426593,0.0057436754,0.0000037813825,0.018114474,0.000114879775,0.00023760117,0.0000060163297,0.000010850595,0.0015028174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985125,0.0004694492,0.00031712046,0.00009640317,0.00010884543,0.0004956574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982021,0.0009246917,0.00015108813,0.0005982396,0.0000319133,0.000092000664],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016862823,0.000104837374,0.00021632737,0.000017363554,0.006232831,0.000008359098,0.00039380093,0.00003962472,0.0016629258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000098893936,0.00003886074,0.0000868771,0.00014347135,0.0001269632,0.000015676073,0.0001167399,0.0006884851,0.0007094641],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044877415,0.00013362156,0.042739946,0.0009217657,0.00023035878,0.000004372956,0.016817551,0.000007928796,0.000041441774,0.55100614,0.31351134,0.07454068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004389362,0.00004998633,0.046605743,0.00038190474,0.000028582697,0.0000011484292,0.00044777014,0.0000025846098,0.0000021668536,0.0004380041,0.95194,0.000058213387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24393511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99773586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75380075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003974893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022659652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010008752","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2012.41.2.0236","title":"Racial Vilification and Freedom of Speech in Australia and Elsewhere","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Offensive; Law; Charter; Legislature; Context (archaeology); Political science; Politics; Government (linguistics); Democracy; Legislation; Freedom of information; Sociology; Law and economics; History; Linguistics; Economics","score_opus":0.03108574647807879,"score_gpt":0.30010409840855523,"score_spread":0.26901835193047646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010008752","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4928816,0.46547896,0.0046924055,0.008748092,0.001766338,0.002694056,0.0000097334305,0.0002778439,0.02345098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98609966,0.008404706,0.0049011996,0.00020811768,0.00007058007,0.000012563531,0.0000018494314,0.0000048603943,0.00029644615],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992424,0.00010294351,0.00025219395,0.00014610578,0.00010255839,0.00015374557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948967,0.00003527776,0.00009413895,0.00028277707,0.00002250131,0.00007564075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005247664,0.0000852338,0.00022457872,0.000048943275,0.000038367034,0.000028511426,0.00016542124,0.00002940197,0.000025458232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013387588,0.000075296724,0.000025745068,0.00034208415,0.00006164714,0.00034870766,0.00008392255,0.00010893083,0.000016787557],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067059573,0.00009783068,0.014380316,0.002143245,0.000011941462,0.0000046368527,0.00023772146,8.2605453e-7,0.0011930461,0.28049538,0.0014833694,0.699945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008150839,0.00015010143,0.061830193,0.00657673,0.000072802715,0.0001097055,0.000010407739,0.0005544078,0.0074113184,0.0056417636,0.91618496,0.00064251357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002082915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00072419056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9147016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012750234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005659438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30705112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024612190","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2010.39.1.0195","title":"Speech, Equality, and Citizenship in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Hatred; Xenophobia; Human rights; Racism; Law; Incitement; Terrorism; Sociology; Sedition; Criticism; Political science; Criminology; Citizenship; Politics","score_opus":0.019617307612958202,"score_gpt":0.25944653486200536,"score_spread":0.23982922724904715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024612190","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22028263,0.19164722,0.0017124234,0.05844342,0.0068919114,0.0031013328,0.000017623846,0.00070895976,0.51719445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839645,0.0043678936,0.0028838047,0.008110885,0.000058350703,0.000019272067,0.0000020208065,0.000009885784,0.00058339664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892676,0.00012027015,0.00027998662,0.0002515232,0.00018883885,0.00023263447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913657,0.00009332119,0.0000686656,0.00055249396,0.00002536294,0.00012360957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005760589,0.000115758405,0.00026939594,0.00003843911,0.00007502195,0.0000724569,0.00045783853,0.000022435013,0.00005949155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026023,0.00010296343,0.000030927433,0.00046236912,0.000035657624,0.00011281139,0.00018538174,0.00036397492,0.000022632717],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015918844,0.000016164264,0.0040209056,0.00092078914,0.000008071606,0.000110630186,0.000016211792,3.861844e-7,0.00023466516,0.55236435,0.0072544585,0.43505177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003469062,0.000025624036,0.008383934,0.002468746,0.000016338765,0.00018755542,0.0000030570134,0.00039556064,0.0018355753,0.025195757,0.9605859,0.0005550366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4615484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9912755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9533315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054877277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001576197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5420372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033759486","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2010.39.4.0211","title":"Getting to Grips with the Shareholder Value Theory in Corporate Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shareholder value; Shareholder; Shareholder primacy; Corporate law; Value (mathematics); Stakeholder; Corporate governance; Stakeholder theory; Law and economics; Shareholder resolution; Business; Accounting; Shareholder loan; Law; Economics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.04901545279999093,"score_gpt":0.2369588806333884,"score_spread":0.1879434278333975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033759486","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03270677,0.07703889,0.00012612795,0.01750222,0.001573315,0.0023272047,0.000118200755,0.000097687785,0.8685096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9711898,0.0018113718,0.00015953762,0.025027072,0.00033875057,0.00016627439,0.000014583498,0.000053880794,0.0012387064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811304,0.000092459646,0.0009324076,0.00044941186,0.00003915831,0.00037350247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819374,0.00016999588,0.00066542235,0.00081836,0.0000263808,0.00012610017],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027639251,0.00020095464,0.00085006584,0.00007867874,0.00022297713,0.00014691401,0.0006011614,0.00006224308,0.0005390359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036739413,0.00017715471,0.00013141693,0.00041408552,0.00023536217,0.00022543136,0.00012666929,0.0004426861,0.0010124157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000738891,0.00002778664,0.004016556,0.0002446369,0.000020369936,0.000004492815,0.00008111246,0.000013561788,0.0000026616303,0.99135596,0.0031092102,0.0011162639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025941836,0.00002546797,0.0019261339,0.0009879897,0.0000125448705,0.0000072749654,0.000012632847,0.000030496967,0.000014205185,0.17197545,0.82440215,0.00034623768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015920543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04021605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93848306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005944249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015751653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037436209","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2010.39.1.0196","title":"Professor Waldron Goes to Canada (One More Time): The Canadian Charter and the Counter-Majoritarian Difficulty","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitution; Political science; Judicial review; Law; Legitimacy; Legislature; State (computer science); Law and economics; Separation of powers; Bill of rights; Power (physics); Constitutional law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.01689867215698869,"score_gpt":0.29956660198958646,"score_spread":0.28266792983259775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037436209","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009210821,0.015668193,1.8075247e-7,0.9215429,0.0006266502,0.0016710303,0.000032849428,0.000024854342,0.051222537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9456656,0.0019075838,0.000016728702,0.03982481,0.000316873,0.0001290283,0.000008080662,0.0000120430495,0.012119273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984904,0.0002928612,0.00023705247,0.00020290581,0.00037742773,0.00039934233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987461,0.00030054068,0.0000715426,0.00045708177,0.000096114876,0.00032862698],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013802528,0.00014092815,0.00031801793,0.000014310639,0.001851259,0.0001850467,0.0006635712,0.000039059883,0.0004345645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001274152,0.00007463562,0.000057148623,0.00024935996,0.0006662458,0.00009300455,0.0000794033,0.00036962092,0.00006258358],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017623574,0.00002267326,0.0004655248,0.0004289569,0.00003285969,0.000014631741,0.003504243,1.3712321e-7,0.000015588808,0.64883107,0.33014843,0.016518224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008134009,0.0000050229137,0.001661833,0.0007345859,0.000065208886,0.0000025218833,0.00015929317,0.0000031235209,0.000002826497,0.0003449427,0.99681294,0.00012638011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9947226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9364548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001393287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054818374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048502062","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2011.40.1.0215","title":"Federal Spending Power in Three Federations: Australia, Canada and the United States","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Local Government Finance and Decentralization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Constitution; Government (linguistics); Political science; Context (archaeology); Power (physics); Separation of powers; Public administration; Enumerated powers; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.06634757656485094,"score_gpt":0.31226929780729945,"score_spread":0.24592172124244852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048502062","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43004182,0.124985754,0.0003285357,0.050481107,0.001680495,0.0059723244,0.00004032376,0.00015596514,0.38631368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9707126,0.023625799,0.000029441491,0.0043184087,0.000018125145,0.000020603064,0.00001400841,0.0000047918325,0.001256242],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905235,0.00020443102,0.00022962295,0.00010581142,0.00021971531,0.0001880438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963784,0.00009642484,0.00008056054,0.00011480099,0.00002169427,0.00004868605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050691946,0.00007601954,0.00017537476,0.000015062043,0.00040945245,0.00008432758,0.00013554709,0.00001716619,0.00054493285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003840068,0.00005217682,0.00002374497,0.00037877174,0.00018891595,0.00015334104,0.000030043271,0.0000898708,0.00000648668],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010019488,0.0000144098585,0.03077602,0.000053203574,0.0000061547194,0.00000528595,0.00059580914,0.000002163277,4.70615e-8,0.962719,0.005365944,0.00045189142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046561865,0.0000092302425,0.02555847,0.0011798036,0.000024957671,8.305251e-7,0.0002857509,0.000036938512,0.0000073737506,0.025077267,0.94716597,0.00018776461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93387985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94180006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011565787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054509906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5966633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051668494","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2013.42.1.0248","title":"The Seizure of Illicit Assets: Patterns of Civil Forfeiture in Canada and Ireland","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Parallels; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; State (computer science); Organised crime; Criminology; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.013649186369903024,"score_gpt":0.2781071660239265,"score_spread":0.26445797965402346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051668494","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6761719,0.290573,0.000012201018,0.0100737,0.00026341368,0.0008125255,0.00002357858,0.000010187922,0.022059495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91225845,0.08689538,0.0000033762713,0.000441733,0.00001635269,0.000017443326,0.0000017350978,0.0000027044607,0.00036281193],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921954,0.000147326,0.00026511267,0.00007776022,0.00016987616,0.00012038438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993191,0.0002655011,0.00013016876,0.00017213891,0.00007080182,0.000042290652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002995338,0.0000583488,0.00025507726,0.000020302878,0.0001458057,0.000017514189,0.00016275441,0.000016162496,0.00021184699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035787034,0.00003779356,0.00005053031,0.00033784076,0.00007618196,0.00006152289,0.000031673957,0.00009680879,0.000001159687],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059538293,0.00007896277,0.41794267,0.0041668573,0.00011534269,0.0000075278626,0.0023308583,0.000011602133,0.000009721099,0.04642433,0.023822175,0.505084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001504158,0.000023354914,0.03708868,0.0058551724,0.00049343624,0.0000022580975,0.019751988,0.000040152016,0.000015175835,0.0007358127,0.9356193,0.00022428227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9880685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9117971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005183956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012448136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23195758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053793258","doi":"10.1350/clwr.33.2.103.36495","title":"Alcohol Provider Liability in Canada and the United Kingdom: Legal and Cultural Influences","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Bar Association","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Duty of care; Duty; Business; Duty to protect; Law; Harm; Paternalism; Legal liability; Political science","score_opus":0.07425810013670905,"score_gpt":0.36264346837789413,"score_spread":0.2883853682411851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053793258","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79748327,0.085144386,2.7963827e-7,0.1050291,0.00013544584,0.0010091551,0.0000026114521,0.000022822689,0.011172946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9798433,0.014090804,0.000021148433,0.0058508026,0.000031258918,0.000029768773,0.000001268898,0.000002861319,0.0001287789],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987448,0.00037170504,0.00026629967,0.00017552997,0.00023008208,0.00021161784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993035,0.00031675713,0.000075602984,0.00016075216,0.000051582476,0.00009176436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010039282,0.00010126336,0.000283118,0.000015138585,0.000379102,0.000111559544,0.0002151299,0.000017560327,0.000027397506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022212959,0.000059552873,0.000029762186,0.00045181726,0.0009427271,0.00030128015,0.00007390116,0.00018118402,0.000001719065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018386636,0.000012733712,0.027591608,0.00078020664,0.000007018216,0.000014220852,0.0008285442,0.000008232223,0.0000011313883,0.96540636,0.0008480104,0.004483575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035674512,0.000006748627,0.0128407525,0.00258788,0.00004214124,0.000003991462,0.00028992773,0.0000028323868,0.0000037126094,0.004246485,0.97948015,0.00013865883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9949737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9993443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9786321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001777737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037053702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34735173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056126759","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2009.38.1.0181","title":"Relocating Officially Induced Error of Law: Fitting the Remedy to the Wrong","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministry of Fisheries, New Zealand","keywords":"Mistake; Excuse; Law; Jurisdiction; Ignorance; Supreme court; Political science; Commission; State (computer science); Criminal law; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.13175978513366343,"score_gpt":0.4190385052998113,"score_spread":0.28727872016614786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056126759","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010864067,0.074384846,0.000016279597,0.3881108,0.00042950583,0.0017496942,0.0000019173242,0.00009787287,0.52434504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9752509,0.002510671,0.00016872416,0.02101326,0.00026974897,0.000014702226,8.6786275e-7,0.000007977759,0.0007631544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792403,0.00061647984,0.00051290944,0.0001918703,0.00044373746,0.00031098412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984048,0.000584439,0.00024752028,0.000549947,0.0001272141,0.000086062064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033538914,0.00012345589,0.00034031319,0.000015806316,0.0011212383,0.000073947725,0.0009691892,0.00003212137,0.00007460342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005476207,0.000071324546,0.0001354402,0.0006246356,0.00020817574,0.00013687526,0.00010098316,0.00026714336,0.000055367287],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042148663,0.000021382511,0.0000365256,0.00016745135,0.0000049310174,0.0000016031807,0.0018541347,0.000004661586,0.00006383872,0.9071705,0.0055121738,0.08515864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000306576,0.00003882514,0.0004654716,0.0055825138,0.00006707385,0.0000011317566,0.00037472896,0.000005172131,0.000118725155,0.001953708,0.99123514,0.00012684667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005819477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13133658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98572296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038773396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009005952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8845143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056925861","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2014.43.1.0262","title":"Necessity: Duress of Circumstances or Moral Involuntariness?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excuse; Element (criminal law); Law; Supreme court; Welsh; Courage; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.064879815500039,"score_gpt":0.3696249763636343,"score_spread":0.30474516086359527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056925861","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004532829,0.05762386,0.00011191926,0.02071019,0.00026882856,0.000841012,0.000013588034,0.00012474961,0.91577303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96855485,0.02177364,0.00022824589,0.0031960835,0.00019610352,0.00005828003,0.000007945898,0.000009897391,0.005974929],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889916,0.00020839847,0.0003152159,0.00015791185,0.0002373057,0.00018197959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991298,0.00015476828,0.00019063741,0.00035517244,0.000076695345,0.00009293991],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000692811,0.00008902121,0.0003569871,0.000020010752,0.00033287043,0.000041132993,0.0004887808,0.000026918127,0.00068352657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005718818,0.00006593234,0.00008489983,0.00054753106,0.0003241853,0.00016990905,0.000087959,0.000108284614,0.000042370455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000219511,0.000036253725,0.0038623388,0.0007670333,0.0000056298013,4.2719552e-7,0.000097422286,7.136662e-7,0.0000037909717,0.9761147,0.005170015,0.013939511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067133114,0.000007116297,0.0011599022,0.001316436,0.000032429365,2.7464705e-7,0.000023066239,0.000006215065,0.000022988688,0.0072878664,0.9899788,0.000097810764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058505903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18509626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98480874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027098975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006175412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88443816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058171737","doi":"10.1350/clwr.34.1.39.60192","title":"Liability of Churches and Religious Organizations for Sexual Abuse of Children by Ministers of Religion","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Law; Sexual abuse; Child sexual abuse; Criminology; Political science; Sociology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.013865548917249315,"score_gpt":0.3113998388421154,"score_spread":0.2975342899248661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058171737","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2761491,0.4338117,0.00036449888,0.014853268,0.00019466344,0.003813493,0.00129993,0.00009344202,0.2694199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9624319,0.035075635,0.00093586976,0.00072913023,0.000041759824,0.000008526194,0.00003877056,0.000006038977,0.0007323736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991552,0.000108169574,0.00039103968,0.00010890153,0.00013094561,0.00010573008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904585,0.00029672548,0.00024136875,0.00017814654,0.00017902056,0.000058906357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035169307,0.000067560555,0.00032898082,0.000017936072,0.00010159399,0.0000044448348,0.00014083544,0.000027452177,0.000019158751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013875357,0.00006179368,0.00004700799,0.00027980848,0.0013050272,0.00005910807,0.000020390788,0.000038883827,0.0000010778186],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000429309,0.00010055579,0.0075533446,0.0006692449,0.000018955028,2.0431107e-8,0.0004033947,0.0000012190221,0.000030598923,0.96526784,0.024834754,0.001115789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012189166,0.000038780345,0.00016345269,0.0005554546,0.00009864383,7.437388e-7,0.000037918227,0.0000010462284,0.00029667036,0.00037266614,0.99822503,0.000087723325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018690163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016107654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9733903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023091847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018732279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48084268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075245561","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2009.38.4.0199","title":"Extending Time Limits in Sexual Abuse Cases: A Critical Comparative Evaluation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Sexual abuse; Law; Quality (philosophy); Political science; Criminology; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.19722759302727283,"score_gpt":0.49206616615775356,"score_spread":0.29483857313048073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075245561","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026425868,0.3590534,0.00005588315,0.027801743,0.00062760245,0.0033528714,0.000013675914,0.00032445756,0.5823445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98316306,0.009832566,0.00021183792,0.0049304324,0.0001865574,0.00007146437,0.000020487882,0.0000070603523,0.001576563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977187,0.00093247683,0.00037765823,0.0002307365,0.00047501584,0.00026543322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987108,0.00073805073,0.00008059827,0.00016245942,0.00021818842,0.000089880916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016920691,0.00013081705,0.00044602918,0.00007043047,0.00045105102,0.00006898749,0.00016571874,0.000036040645,0.0007907546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038163143,0.00011749208,0.000044654156,0.0008754026,0.00019908606,0.0003100827,0.000015703848,0.0001501275,0.00021003632],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006275674,0.0011982188,0.0031446172,0.0007001871,0.00007691925,0.00009112125,0.044848043,0.000092465445,0.00003914814,0.6252578,0.09421472,0.23027404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073401415,0.00020952307,0.0037458956,0.0048061935,0.00026852216,0.00000764128,0.004884548,0.0012353593,0.000015387865,0.0032102372,0.98019224,0.0006904146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028835086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013956832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95673716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013403794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052081446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8658208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082111201","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2009.38.2.0183","title":"The Meanings of Dishonesty in Theft","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dishonesty; CLARITY; Term (time); Element (criminal law); Political science; Law; Criminology; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.025974980099011405,"score_gpt":0.35769158446168114,"score_spread":0.33171660436266975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082111201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032189135,0.38955292,0.000018500607,0.03554011,0.00032466959,0.0005903852,0.0000013602455,0.0000593563,0.54172355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8828636,0.11489561,0.0000133377725,0.0012350783,0.000039740757,0.00000605747,6.578816e-7,0.000002092084,0.0009438361],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917495,0.00020437842,0.00024120793,0.00008127177,0.00016548391,0.0001327117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942046,0.00020112678,0.000093439834,0.00020834309,0.000044725562,0.00003192243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088107085,0.000051815034,0.00020367026,0.000025797573,0.00031479186,0.000027640323,0.00025312058,0.000013073558,0.00008833661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007541428,0.00003331054,0.000111398236,0.00082486373,0.0001441665,0.00006926597,0.000016723368,0.000096659234,0.000014634868],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003336681,0.00005598414,0.0007867325,0.00011011237,0.0000068331074,0.0000023813911,0.0016066027,0.0000018253568,0.0000033393903,0.3581586,0.0017057981,0.63755846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037499518,0.000013535821,0.0009270392,0.001519481,0.00017130992,6.010936e-7,0.005360781,0.000006451689,0.000009396868,0.0034299325,0.98844093,0.00008304492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048706178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27009374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9867351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026908712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022727107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74322516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085829298","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2008.37.1.9","title":"An Analysis of the Auditors' Liability to Third Parties in Australia","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Insurance and Financial Risk Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indemnity; Seriousness; Liability; Audit; Statutory law; Corporation; Government (linguistics); Business; Law; Liability insurance; Political science; Accounting","score_opus":0.057589131680176577,"score_gpt":0.28960666066550156,"score_spread":0.232017528985325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085829298","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92466915,0.038919196,0.000070722126,0.0028365962,0.00087622914,0.0011606998,0.00012303052,0.00002893299,0.03131547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898175,0.0076408824,0.00006127279,0.0012412919,0.0000436451,0.00005111216,0.000005380287,0.0000062050244,0.0011327338],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863636,0.000058133028,0.0008019776,0.00026281094,0.000050314462,0.00019040935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987867,0.00002742414,0.0002699893,0.000847045,0.0000242742,0.000044594362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082540704,0.00011452144,0.00077857205,0.00016032932,0.00008625102,0.000011454779,0.00043048037,0.000028669594,0.000222616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041463823,0.00009607957,0.0002721914,0.0019400232,0.000098756536,0.00012978858,0.00007594812,0.000120033794,0.00012890916],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043046302,0.00012232095,0.6849181,0.00027700883,0.00005060268,0.0000014614684,0.0001460463,0.00034681452,4.5028204e-7,0.30983183,0.003750269,0.0005508056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005027625,0.000016407386,0.6431704,0.0002056589,0.000046631325,8.7232664e-8,0.00000285324,0.000056825942,0.00001168239,0.0027561767,0.35357338,0.000109614724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022608936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014078102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34982312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000065091874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000061864566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7855912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086930835","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2005.34.3.201","title":"Contingency Fee Agreements with Represented Persons in Class Actions—An Undesirable Australian Phenomenon","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Contingency; Statute; Law; Political science; Class (philosophy); Legislature; Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Commission; Business","score_opus":0.07017741307805546,"score_gpt":0.31321063370859503,"score_spread":0.24303322063053956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086930835","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044906307,0.0059411763,0.000042793028,0.019788506,0.00019713942,0.0009605547,0.0000049812757,0.00022388148,0.96835035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96154135,0.0021727618,0.00022604369,0.008338947,0.0005255525,0.0001530407,0.00011525285,0.0000494456,0.02687763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847084,0.000047900015,0.00044463613,0.00037158816,0.0002620962,0.00040293473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990636,0.000019809628,0.0002563829,0.00053317146,0.000083472194,0.000043580945],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033814288,0.00023316359,0.00038923108,0.00020203143,0.00032037206,0.00023941135,0.0003079843,0.00003902038,0.0020137061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011877958,0.0002019954,0.000097913624,0.0011711384,0.00007683002,0.0015398704,0.00008237444,0.00027213886,0.0005277062],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058848902,0.001508775,0.01909931,0.0024938327,0.0001344836,0.0000243623,0.000038203587,0.00016448133,0.000090346475,0.7920954,0.113364846,0.0709271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052155514,0.00001072027,0.002790814,0.0016086019,0.00009592152,0.0000028751506,0.000101960526,0.00032536086,0.0000046985992,0.00014451524,0.9941371,0.0002558577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010670658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039174926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9570507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013183373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020043895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99889857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095517978","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2010.39.1.0194","title":"Twenty-Five Years of Disability Equality? Interpreting Disability Rights in the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Context (archaeology); Social rights; Medical model of disability; Sociology; Human rights; Psychology","score_opus":0.028048050940806524,"score_gpt":0.3496863337112039,"score_spread":0.32163828277039735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095517978","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8552872,0.0016462695,0.0000019180013,0.02219004,0.0006215914,0.001673633,0.00004702444,0.000019417997,0.11851294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993084,0.00017750365,0.00003638083,0.00026817902,0.0000482583,0.000023011642,0.000008573282,0.000003839251,0.00012586778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966177,0.0014877081,0.00079314754,0.0002523919,0.0006057233,0.00024333455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974303,0.0013715198,0.0002805937,0.0007481394,0.00009181213,0.0000776026],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044465037,0.00011143065,0.0004824438,0.000009456858,0.00018004708,0.000023653416,0.0006840973,0.000045600522,0.00045570228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004050891,0.0000711267,0.00015487085,0.0004513899,0.0030213085,0.00016894954,0.00008712593,0.00031135802,0.0000015089978],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013779893,0.0005216184,0.11544785,0.0012979751,0.000015784151,9.442133e-7,0.003829508,0.0000023553519,0.000016083903,0.871308,0.0013139728,0.006232073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003437008,0.000037988833,0.18601172,0.00289572,0.00011495738,9.275439e-7,0.0019976725,0.000029175462,0.00015628558,0.110468045,0.6975277,0.00041611274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8485038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99663866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014035954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015343163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111151991","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2007.36.2.106","title":"Going Virtual: Using Some Common Law World Initiatives to Update the Nigerian Law on Corporate Democracy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law reform; Corporate governance; The Internet; Democracy; Shareholder; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Corporate law; Business; Law; Economics; Public administration; Political science; Finance; Politics","score_opus":0.05799144634457442,"score_gpt":0.2949627132824753,"score_spread":0.23697126693790088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111151991","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11948767,0.052386656,0.00035034103,0.05240795,0.003958464,0.005933928,0.00006450279,0.0011093915,0.7643011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79072803,0.0015402349,0.000104354025,0.2053491,0.0012942468,0.00003125927,0.00006878825,0.00010636404,0.0007776054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99676657,0.00013164064,0.0011195717,0.0006110696,0.00056720985,0.0008039571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99696046,0.00030173553,0.0013770254,0.0011190348,0.0001577502,0.000083983396],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019449167,0.0006007484,0.0010033824,0.00018838773,0.0012458933,0.00074710196,0.0009513497,0.000062078725,0.00040468347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030393077,0.00045450559,0.00028963573,0.0021429693,0.00035885832,0.0025765584,0.0006037018,0.0005966131,0.0015139756],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007144042,0.000097599375,0.0012671261,0.00065242685,0.000042012376,0.00008378224,0.000012511451,0.000043472653,0.000058160516,0.98415333,0.0064961845,0.0070219636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035747542,0.000022485923,0.0011252743,0.0067787278,0.00017211409,0.000004225211,0.000017428596,0.00009106196,0.00021933479,0.037276514,0.9532732,0.00066219136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012223412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062157262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9468768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012531361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026157539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112852255","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2005.34.4.316","title":"The Enduring Legacy of ‘Reckless Disregard’","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Appeal; Demise; Duty; Law; Duty of care; Proposition; Order (exchange); Common law; Political science; Standard of review; Law and economics; Sociology; Judicial review; Business","score_opus":0.04968559655905262,"score_gpt":0.38046439981864427,"score_spread":0.33077880325959164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112852255","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016124186,0.4411388,0.000005040037,0.06430336,0.00026740704,0.00039756796,0.000001413052,0.000049410453,0.49222457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8507064,0.14140598,0.00007648311,0.0012802164,0.0002733743,0.000020938389,7.741506e-7,0.0000074435025,0.0062283957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987446,0.00026163872,0.0003260145,0.00012359126,0.00029576896,0.00024840832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900365,0.00038007708,0.00013353025,0.0003454789,0.00005598814,0.00008126875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012782561,0.00008501458,0.0002558807,0.000011849631,0.0006845123,0.00008559758,0.0005584181,0.00001880934,0.00023155418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008678036,0.00005639248,0.0001341051,0.0002690932,0.00044249915,0.00031899347,0.00008211024,0.0001304909,0.00008829958],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025182896,0.000018466439,0.00015037842,0.0003584241,0.000005644598,0.0000010247275,0.00019917611,6.276905e-7,0.0000040175137,0.8280537,0.010171812,0.16103421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029708224,0.000004335416,0.00013915537,0.0025002481,0.000034681947,6.9317554e-7,0.00008256831,0.0000010817844,0.00008162935,0.0008692,0.9961813,0.0000753941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012202667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07485066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9860095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004514346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004048332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9420309},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166345381","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2007.36.1.50","title":"Protecting Prepaying Buyers of Unascertained Goods: Why ‘Pay before You Go’ May Be Bad for You","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Appeal; Legislature; Statutory law; Jurisdiction; Political science; Commission; Intervention (counseling); Judicial review; Doctrine; Injustice; Law and economics; Common law; Position (finance); Economics","score_opus":0.056863311170841646,"score_gpt":0.38294445570573404,"score_spread":0.3260811445348924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166345381","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0067942226,0.06892687,0.0034366031,0.15171634,0.0007995556,0.01992368,0.00013178303,0.0006798673,0.7475911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97354054,0.0039806627,0.004629005,0.0048923804,0.0005386821,0.0006885398,0.000041970925,0.000059846425,0.011628338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829024,0.00015504398,0.00061215647,0.00028042437,0.0002446803,0.00041743266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986465,0.0002885378,0.00036159233,0.00043076646,0.00013055146,0.00014206038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032489307,0.00015384743,0.00042053306,0.000041714156,0.00084908976,0.00004965388,0.000476804,0.000060128295,0.00010484476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025374047,0.00011800903,0.00024939928,0.0007212019,0.00022304962,0.00016693668,0.000094719675,0.00023113484,0.000009262103],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012022281,0.00008904937,0.0012382112,0.0021066791,0.000037144957,9.746352e-7,0.0015088039,0.000003696236,0.000064566564,0.9223777,0.004032292,0.06852885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001443887,0.000027350336,0.00012369547,0.0015423138,0.00006819064,5.4054163e-7,0.00026359368,0.000009347064,0.00018680963,0.0030714392,0.9944119,0.00015042158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002770088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040730502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99037963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000111229994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008188643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9767737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2185371555","doi":"10.1177/1473779515592833","title":"Injured passengers and the defence of illegality","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Appeal; Tort; Scope (computer science); Context (archaeology); Order (exchange); Law; Law and economics; Common law; Political science; Business; Proposition; High Court; Liability; Economics; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.07494922749480872,"score_gpt":0.38303665179963603,"score_spread":0.30808742430482733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2185371555","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021338125,0.18429768,0.000016543472,0.09152344,0.00009797101,0.00095263636,0.000008353708,0.00004074201,0.72092885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9734941,0.023315873,0.00009997526,0.0021739576,0.000041641837,0.000037691654,0.0000011857637,0.000002986517,0.00083258335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912006,0.00033275364,0.00019432556,0.000087377324,0.00017111977,0.00009433798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931717,0.000167996,0.00010401642,0.00025500794,0.00007169286,0.00008413335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016931666,0.000048058264,0.00020415988,0.0000061839783,0.00019556293,0.00002551034,0.00024313983,0.000014390183,0.000032728818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000112811336,0.000029239087,0.00005197192,0.00028274444,0.00077135366,0.000074026015,0.000071184644,0.00008332263,0.000012484773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024255435,0.000008830379,0.00020370835,0.00008408242,0.0000034852005,8.8329294e-8,0.0003527444,1.01675724e-7,7.0838365e-7,0.9885616,0.005243046,0.005539205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012133558,0.000002621916,0.00020271946,0.00024346093,0.000025917496,1.8508946e-7,0.00009159861,0.0000020868665,0.000005465316,0.012278934,0.9869843,0.000041334915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031977755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011325543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9817413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016633552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052206433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63199186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2423013223","doi":"10.1177/1473779516657745","title":"Evolution, revolution and culture shift","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Settlement (finance); Economic Justice; Adversarial system; Law; Political science; Process (computing); Sociology; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.01663805972798435,"score_gpt":0.25173558595008605,"score_spread":0.2350975262221017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2423013223","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033485267,0.22712542,0.0014734698,0.06258777,0.0006841943,0.0007421585,0.0000091852735,0.00044066782,0.7066023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9386065,0.031906072,0.00009154418,0.014965767,0.0009778982,0.0000786064,0.00002500902,0.000030064117,0.013318527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914074,0.000020985219,0.0002654586,0.00022270255,0.00015008598,0.00020002059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994445,0.00002023452,0.00014923867,0.0002824466,0.00008058537,0.000023019322],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002270957,0.00014553557,0.00023906997,0.00007114628,0.00026754657,0.00008927107,0.0001454382,0.00003510854,0.00065766444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035590892,0.000091609305,0.00009288474,0.00046732547,0.000112953465,0.0008925434,0.000117374046,0.00008457924,0.00085089274],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020639663,0.000023921455,0.0012680349,0.00063233485,0.000007074657,8.383867e-7,9.812252e-7,6.383501e-8,0.000019603964,0.81611973,0.17176485,0.010160481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018355066,0.0000024969097,0.005873516,0.0028303408,0.00007667332,0.0000028628422,0.00000209911,0.000011916146,0.0000012092805,0.017139984,0.9737226,0.0001527875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001120369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014731097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93827164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005484058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008159673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531130657","doi":"10.1177/1473779516661939","title":"Can class members appeal class action settlements? A study from British Columbia","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Plaintiff; Appeal; Settlement (finance); Law; Negotiation; Political science; Human settlement; Class (philosophy); Supreme court; Action (physics); Business; History","score_opus":0.03313534164684181,"score_gpt":0.2782867312496811,"score_spread":0.2451513896028393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531130657","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061289176,0.018565789,0.00008073376,0.060545966,0.004112004,0.005203749,0.0003110198,0.0012654763,0.8486261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9649296,0.0042671077,0.000015626365,0.016448708,0.00084164937,0.00025024347,0.0001402403,0.000055132616,0.013051716],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818826,0.00007627121,0.0005402505,0.0004429159,0.00039037576,0.00036192575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989246,0.00005610982,0.00033224217,0.000522527,0.00011762651,0.00004685965],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034628803,0.00019325959,0.00048069598,0.000057969217,0.00045069444,0.00082067365,0.0003560941,0.000044626784,0.007465405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027801108,0.00020650607,0.00019164813,0.0006248942,0.00008784341,0.00080838683,0.00022508393,0.0001727303,0.00066549977],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008263451,0.00056312827,0.024345545,0.0006138401,0.0001622059,0.000026360703,0.0000040145637,5.3776137e-7,0.000022925053,0.014773405,0.80432737,0.15515243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007686546,0.000009752219,0.013660928,0.0020196424,0.00027596456,0.0000021180042,0.00005175657,0.000020946733,6.464772e-7,0.0006991069,0.98220575,0.00028475295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054779097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8216957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9036404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000179301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022960225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9934419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765178681","doi":"10.1177/1473779517725010","title":"Punitive damages for breach of contract","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Damages; Law; Appeal; Jurisprudence; Punishment (psychology); Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.10015441868510054,"score_gpt":0.4525898886485318,"score_spread":0.3524354699634312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765178681","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00060083286,0.034187127,0.000070820395,0.03878247,0.000105481806,0.0014129592,0.0000801538,0.00003196102,0.9247282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9754741,0.018607503,0.00022426304,0.0011347078,0.00011240878,0.0001121259,0.000009184304,0.0000063821426,0.004319313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942267,0.00006928971,0.0001824619,0.00009687713,0.00009985243,0.00012883157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989538,0.00020938605,0.00024158513,0.00042562277,0.00011131853,0.000058282625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063439197,0.000056089786,0.00024218857,0.000008621269,0.00090559066,0.000070556096,0.00050177827,0.000019381838,0.00012822995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012409601,0.000046601617,0.000106921965,0.000053745272,0.00036863537,0.00016260665,0.000057276407,0.00006575415,0.000015638827],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011395618,0.000026519285,0.00026950153,0.00022496266,0.0000072108633,1.8834804e-7,0.00007627369,2.8218581e-8,0.0000075951434,0.9649723,0.003438367,0.0309759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000088157154,0.0000059604185,0.0018967992,0.0008454048,0.00003962508,1.0971904e-7,0.000018327073,0.0000018101281,0.000055267243,0.005369468,0.9916196,0.000059510694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029241478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021488518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9881812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015518803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040088067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99636674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767838882","doi":"10.1177/1473779517735286","title":"Predictability, certainty, and party autonomy in the sale and supply of goods","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal certainty; Legislation; Certainty; Predictability; Law; Common law; Autonomy; Law and economics; Supreme court; Business; Order (exchange); Interpretation (philosophy); Jurisdiction; Economics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.05284738261592386,"score_gpt":0.301247279643101,"score_spread":0.24839989702717713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767838882","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.084286086,0.0871278,0.000021964985,0.06271405,0.00064788334,0.001988234,0.000034673165,0.00006591329,0.7631134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99254405,0.0042502037,0.000032933647,0.0027581765,0.00017547916,0.000020658883,0.00001201148,0.000005917327,0.00020057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932766,0.000025846666,0.00028067754,0.00014418321,0.00011551886,0.00010614214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992724,0.000102033155,0.00020757482,0.00037605033,0.00003397897,0.000007961196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067066273,0.00009306114,0.00026146186,0.000025767855,0.00014774394,0.00019246893,0.00038082513,0.000017464961,0.0000978328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000106122025,0.00006152738,0.000041803745,0.00005130961,0.00044759823,0.00039874553,0.00024009068,0.00009372542,0.000005535778],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004089375,0.00005313301,0.2467301,0.002448061,0.000009657297,0.0000024172757,0.00001979656,3.1410232e-7,0.0000012118937,0.74018514,0.00425783,0.006288254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002590955,0.000006582093,0.21533744,0.001523086,0.00005788985,0.0000017721056,0.0000087436565,0.00017705238,0.0000026882005,0.030211106,0.752316,0.00009855996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011157185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004163831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90825796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000866108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007950416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2509014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768174928","doi":"10.1177/1473779517739798","title":"The need for an intrusion upon seclusion privacy tort within English law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Seclusion; Punitive damages; Law; Confidentiality; Political science; Intrusion; Right to privacy; Common law; Privacy laws of the United States; English law; Information privacy; Computer security","score_opus":0.060983673195841366,"score_gpt":0.36726336350890965,"score_spread":0.3062796903130683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2768174928","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020635817,0.21177348,0.00071145454,0.12673788,0.021965664,0.021627521,0.00017028298,0.0015801577,0.59479773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9300919,0.060515694,0.0007301013,0.004386688,0.0026062652,0.00034941323,0.00010269675,0.000045228357,0.0011719869],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997906,0.0006239573,0.00041594208,0.00032630944,0.0003773436,0.00035039423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971793,0.00023630449,0.00044039384,0.0017524124,0.0002146338,0.0001769061],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047840504,0.00017227791,0.00034105525,0.000020615222,0.008119556,0.000730695,0.0021164033,0.00008812678,0.000050785147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017319215,0.0001220354,0.00013884516,0.00013874547,0.00042890292,0.0012039794,0.0009123803,0.0002714244,0.000020707597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038687554,0.00006424971,0.0001201316,0.00040351492,0.000009845589,9.561272e-7,0.0014883607,1.4294116e-7,0.000020475407,0.9203961,0.014620478,0.062837064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020811593,0.00005077504,0.000097287004,0.0011101074,0.00004232885,5.2459814e-7,0.00009825112,0.000034308974,0.00009065727,0.044646353,0.9534451,0.00017623724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065195654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1783253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9388246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000102690356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000075337695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99317175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789083327","doi":"10.1177/1473779518773642","title":"Official status of languages in the United Kingdom and Ireland","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Historical Studies of British Isles","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Welsh; Parliament; Legislation; Charter; Kingdom; Political science; Irish; Context (archaeology); Law; CLARITY; Official language; Devolution (biology); Sociology; Geography; Linguistics; Politics","score_opus":0.066749630773388,"score_gpt":0.30518995885391526,"score_spread":0.23844032808052726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789083327","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043930534,0.41098288,6.7428897e-7,0.002964876,0.00025721482,0.00046617063,0.000034343382,0.0000358865,0.5413274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9764703,0.019721575,0.000013858901,0.0029208625,0.000298946,0.000011836849,0.000010453521,0.000008436783,0.0005437226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993257,0.000107949,0.00022185718,0.000086417065,0.00010485338,0.00015323894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995609,0.00015544439,0.00006926611,0.00014365165,0.000046309404,0.000024422481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019238629,0.00007414018,0.00025860753,0.00003580569,0.00018333599,0.000028885655,0.00012956871,0.000009640476,0.00036937962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039857463,0.00004837717,0.00003417418,0.000105506035,0.00057282473,0.00003852765,0.000052222924,0.00009113653,0.000016336327],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006878749,0.0000655157,0.0005886776,0.00072186004,0.000016932188,0.000010328086,0.003913606,3.7990546e-8,6.67915e-7,0.91664773,0.057237405,0.020790355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010446807,0.000040035153,0.0006445485,0.001244462,0.000026258733,0.0000011307857,0.00014097254,8.3568057e-7,0.0000011317627,0.00029113583,0.9974414,0.000063633335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076693236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13072404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94020396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017149381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000048801135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897354250","doi":"10.1177/1473779518802571","title":"In search of a privacy action against breaches of physical privacy in Hong Kong","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Punitive damages; Tort; Damages; Statutory law; Internet privacy; Privacy laws of the United States; Personally identifiable information; Law; Cause of action; Privacy policy; Action (physics); Seclusion; Privacy law; Information privacy; Political science; Business; Computer security; Plaintiff; Computer science","score_opus":0.09189568260883578,"score_gpt":0.39812521062956135,"score_spread":0.30622952802072556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897354250","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9422521,0.019165406,0.000037750673,0.0063819853,0.00028100566,0.0019193506,0.00001474646,0.000057486268,0.029890185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866878,0.012665752,0.000117554126,0.00021105187,0.00021795763,0.00002482219,0.000008317624,0.000009287509,0.000057464946],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979651,0.00072237296,0.00045876816,0.00023227565,0.00035800127,0.00026348062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989694,0.00016567693,0.00019127462,0.00051700964,0.00009226153,0.000064384076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016099927,0.00011547685,0.0004927998,0.00014522174,0.00011627626,0.00002052025,0.00065190287,0.000053031483,0.000056932593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003180606,0.00010844572,0.00010150357,0.0012784621,0.0005202964,0.00058169296,0.0003551918,0.00028251216,0.000021413303],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020929484,0.0033767729,0.0545917,0.01570061,0.00007475452,0.000018623145,0.047449198,0.000004227213,0.0069195563,0.24735571,0.0062572467,0.6180423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019854093,0.00041460973,0.047088396,0.030607767,0.000104345425,0.0000031359468,0.0012473818,0.0003906971,0.026029661,0.0349483,0.85618633,0.0009939937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058932803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032176573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84992903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000120197146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009468239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9854837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970985859","doi":"10.1177/1473779519891597","title":"Twisted into knots: Canada’s challenges in lawful access to encrypted communications","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"United States National Security Agency; Encryption; Agency (philosophy); Law enforcement; Government (linguistics); Law; National security; Political science; Internet privacy; Business; Computer security; Public relations; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.3087194379670787,"score_gpt":0.41953554654088954,"score_spread":0.11081610857381086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970985859","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020000245,0.22905684,0.000027335398,0.5233567,0.00014827553,0.0012140416,0.000015264575,0.000112961105,0.24586862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47993034,0.45289168,0.0005622828,0.065996274,0.00020718522,0.00013766128,0.000059120193,0.00002762188,0.00018782883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810827,0.00082746247,0.0003575422,0.0002384964,0.00025198888,0.00021625782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987577,0.00019472488,0.00009796685,0.00062792975,0.00008350897,0.00023812482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006137286,0.000114240276,0.00029568886,0.000038257596,0.0003487049,0.000082464365,0.0014403028,0.000023843895,0.0001449616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003513922,0.000113110524,0.000037188765,0.0008276603,0.00011709136,0.00030788593,0.0004770718,0.00026516168,0.00010455151],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027913002,0.00012191076,0.00032996008,0.0052184355,0.000024532164,0.000045082532,0.0077959346,0.0000047690132,0.000022056436,0.5178507,0.085435726,0.38312298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000581453,0.00001563909,0.00037822165,0.0018511226,0.000035541372,3.1223433e-7,0.0006850945,0.0000061306855,0.0000063730868,0.00017500033,0.9966498,0.00013862527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5619429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91121405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017292242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026401764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46125132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995287528","doi":"10.1177/1473779519891623","title":"Constitutional promises of indigenous recognition: Canada, Vanuatu and the challenges of pluralism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Indigenous; Commit; Colonialism; Indigenous rights; Political science; Law; Legal pluralism; Sociology; Law and economics; Human rights; Political economy; Epistemology; Comparative law; Legal realism","score_opus":0.04928625957437298,"score_gpt":0.3044637041453054,"score_spread":0.2551774445709324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995287528","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026649885,0.78000873,1.324494e-7,0.030406814,0.0002653302,0.0017889956,0.000041376297,0.00001522971,0.16082348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8382446,0.1606632,0.000040144754,0.0006169713,0.00004144328,0.00003311495,0.0000035013757,0.0000020052862,0.00035497226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988708,0.000308028,0.00028144434,0.00010829523,0.00029820728,0.0001332145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990269,0.00043393907,0.0002157173,0.00011715036,0.00016525082,0.000041025636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059100025,0.000085468884,0.0004342073,0.000005979022,0.00029826252,0.000008584989,0.00017214059,0.000023367948,0.00016693049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000981488,0.000050196868,0.00006577285,0.00012324221,0.0018609875,0.00007758402,0.000057989873,0.000092517774,0.000005218097],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010643707,0.000020715699,0.0007337639,0.0013694235,0.00006983911,0.0000010593908,0.0031894832,2.1147854e-7,0.0000022515976,0.9770897,0.0011811635,0.016331766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006335929,0.000018249502,0.0030158905,0.0044957725,0.00013043605,0.0000026803846,0.0013856505,2.7360423e-7,0.000043185606,0.0033493657,0.9867442,0.00018068215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3285049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84082574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98556304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058725567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000155747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6856886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3029084391","doi":"10.1177/1473779520927715","title":"Through which glass darkly? Constitutional principle in legality and constitutionality review","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Principle of legality; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Statute; Constitution; Legitimacy; Adjudication; Common law; Interpretation (philosophy); Judicial review; Constitutional law; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10086855393848133,"score_gpt":0.38679863242556745,"score_spread":0.2859300784870861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3029084391","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006457165,0.48487028,0.000100061654,0.1314741,0.00014839243,0.00077168044,0.00004151498,0.00005687844,0.38247252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5610581,0.38955355,0.00010867972,0.048937704,0.00018125684,0.00007610196,0.00002449258,0.0000031828342,0.00005696036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976109,0.0005368277,0.00062795694,0.00039861625,0.0005181565,0.0003075232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908394,0.00021759131,0.00015893232,0.00016194796,0.00021929099,0.00015831855],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012917508,0.00019384202,0.0007181395,0.000014672496,0.0008462899,0.00004544945,0.00027786253,0.00004775611,0.00046269118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006789125,0.00017266299,0.00011008755,0.0010625477,0.00406471,0.0004050728,0.00019570367,0.0003070517,0.00008305644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000571285,0.000041435218,0.008928377,0.0017473772,0.000020056275,0.000009011573,0.00005013596,0.0000010053311,4.5612646e-7,0.98013973,0.008372864,0.00068386074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017890737,0.0000069249368,0.0019001551,0.009045941,0.00006029118,0.0000040579957,0.000016289612,0.0000018191538,9.199519e-7,0.019415453,0.969164,0.0002052313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034235078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031624265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9607912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012351226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063653913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99864566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3116037271","doi":"10.1177/1473779520975121","title":"Counterterrorism and the challenges of terrorism from the far right","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Proscription; Political science; Sanctions; Law; Far right; Law and economics; Politics; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.04645612116037193,"score_gpt":0.3168945545549526,"score_spread":0.2704384333945806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3116037271","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039209826,0.57785237,0.0000360663,0.3828139,0.0005630492,0.00095154374,0.00005134128,0.00008369631,0.033727054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7855245,0.18281856,0.000005048499,0.030987231,0.0004980583,0.000044698678,0.0000033646672,0.000015072637,0.000103494094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996893,0.0012324873,0.00060701004,0.00035872683,0.0005139458,0.0003948321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975963,0.0012469094,0.00026316565,0.0005886357,0.0000818075,0.00022313927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011884733,0.000251745,0.00074233476,0.0000137100815,0.0005028232,0.00007202597,0.0011376938,0.00007854415,0.00036185785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001413987,0.0001320656,0.00023168021,0.00025889758,0.0019538817,0.00019981683,0.00019971115,0.00042243119,0.00006600865],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007462842,0.00007482986,0.0004170418,0.0009321512,0.00015150485,0.000016917136,0.110786684,1.2593446e-7,0.0000061707156,0.8184491,0.022978202,0.04611265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056089583,0.000038622526,0.00068542553,0.0026962499,0.0002320012,0.0000017120298,0.013727405,0.000029556193,0.000010543704,0.009563561,0.97220564,0.00024837215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040086345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010098077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94922745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027510363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050371487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71991587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125934066","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2010.39.1.0192","title":"‘Free to Deal as He May Choose’: The Displacement of ‘Freedom of Commerce’ as a Necessary Condition to the Creation of Canadian Multiculturalism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Multiculturalism; Corporation; Charter; Sociology; Jurisdiction; Political science; Law and economics","score_opus":0.020712227215702657,"score_gpt":0.3075396587205928,"score_spread":0.28682743150489015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125934066","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07624684,0.02184451,0.000003157258,0.46956763,0.0011971603,0.004695331,0.0005179529,0.000027395663,0.42590004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9771657,0.005278645,0.00008141199,0.008430047,0.00014817811,0.000097602984,0.000046091558,0.0000112621365,0.008741087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986849,0.00028667008,0.0003790033,0.00012183718,0.0003398111,0.00018776843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871,0.00016063644,0.00020877084,0.00049180124,0.00017851435,0.00025029003],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009185582,0.000088532026,0.0002906917,0.00019827206,0.0006067968,0.000057048823,0.0007160019,0.000041828975,0.0012944894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017326362,0.000064058026,0.000117743206,0.0008443383,0.0006199575,0.0001013382,0.0000636032,0.00017172232,0.00005545472],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011905377,0.0000459082,0.00024072411,0.00040237134,0.000039135575,0.0000015877382,0.007548067,0.000014518218,0.00013852195,0.51856613,0.46348873,0.009502402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000095919226,0.00002395925,0.0043081096,0.0007230136,0.000085251275,9.002966e-7,0.00045359414,0.0000010465325,0.000030706466,0.00021078001,0.99398834,0.000078358775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9814253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90091884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018507075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032684617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3132071353","doi":"10.1177/1473779521991557","title":"Violent crime, hate speech or terrorism? How Canada views and prosecutes far-right extremism (2001–2019)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Far right; Ideology; Law; Political science; Criminology; Rhetoric; Criminal law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.047918684412296,"score_gpt":0.3338737586865225,"score_spread":0.2859550742742265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3132071353","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013888934,0.77871245,0.0000628586,0.13150284,0.0041351332,0.0027281248,0.00022085519,0.00031776165,0.06843102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6477944,0.27237752,0.0001693057,0.03134518,0.0007130342,0.00013763703,0.0000611043,0.000060241444,0.047341578],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99608845,0.00081906904,0.0006532755,0.0006838913,0.00072187546,0.0010334324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977676,0.00031717616,0.0002390302,0.000774075,0.00022935227,0.0006727387],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008892894,0.00042727467,0.0009810344,0.000043507433,0.0006589041,0.0002577083,0.0006360144,0.00011562414,0.0016540167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018909208,0.00032483583,0.0001735442,0.00060181,0.00044960805,0.00035704128,0.00021798398,0.00044648733,0.000046295303],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003134517,0.00032326693,0.0016857383,0.004800099,0.00014034315,0.0016204483,0.0040633907,1.1871148e-7,0.00010067218,0.025235154,0.69139975,0.2705997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018821572,0.000025902416,0.00042189262,0.005300624,0.00012990914,0.000039808896,0.0014225147,0.000005593465,0.00026704383,0.0005102405,0.99120915,0.00047912385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1668102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91734785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7505377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002985028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087400153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157691714","doi":"10.1177/14737795211010822","title":"Warrantless searches of a mobile phone’s digital contents and privacy interests in Hong Kong","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Warrant; Appeal; Law; Officer; Mobile phone; Political science; Power (physics); Phone; Business; Computer science; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.09604262763015724,"score_gpt":0.3717743452874775,"score_spread":0.27573171765732024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157691714","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65297484,0.27573714,0.000058276357,0.0027507788,0.0002909165,0.0012979129,0.00004974588,0.000063720996,0.066776685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94765174,0.051373396,0.00003928133,0.00027369597,0.000032763717,0.000014457512,0.000013736649,0.000007533787,0.0005933684],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889696,0.00031904184,0.0002824468,0.00017369691,0.00016985943,0.00015797156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994304,0.00014368263,0.000083676445,0.0002012899,0.00007207258,0.00006885651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048390534,0.00007716549,0.00028615416,0.000034529334,0.00009562268,0.000082415776,0.00018190654,0.000018976229,0.000079941514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021146418,0.00006992971,0.000048545586,0.00034471985,0.00022581231,0.00037032075,0.00019849814,0.00015267334,0.000024296536],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000664367,0.00059262937,0.028429262,0.017524414,0.000058454887,0.00034044118,0.00910329,0.00000101717,0.00079623907,0.059430372,0.0024945627,0.8811629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000764279,0.00009241303,0.0075026182,0.037238788,0.00013958948,0.000021062782,0.0061140745,0.00001222898,0.0014915017,0.0011522793,0.94501495,0.000456186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006113138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009503482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94252044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027809712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036435562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5303166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254839842","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2010.39.3.0211","title":"Getting to Grips With the Shareholder Value Theory in Corporate Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shareholder value; Shareholder; Shareholder primacy; Corporate law; Value (mathematics); Stakeholder; Stakeholder theory; Corporate governance; Law and economics; Shareholder resolution; Business; Shareholder loan; Accounting; Law; Economics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.04901545279999093,"score_gpt":0.2369588806333884,"score_spread":0.1879434278333975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254839842","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03270677,0.07703889,0.00012612795,0.01750222,0.001573315,0.0023272047,0.000118200755,0.000097687785,0.8685096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9711898,0.0018113718,0.00015953762,0.025027072,0.00033875057,0.00016627439,0.000014583498,0.000053880794,0.0012387064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811304,0.000092459646,0.0009324076,0.00044941186,0.00003915831,0.00037350247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819374,0.00016999588,0.00066542235,0.00081836,0.0000263808,0.00012610017],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027639251,0.00020095464,0.00085006584,0.00007867874,0.00022297713,0.00014691401,0.0006011614,0.00006224308,0.0005390359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036739413,0.00017715471,0.00013141693,0.00041408552,0.00023536217,0.00022543136,0.00012666929,0.0004426861,0.0010124157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000738891,0.00002778664,0.004016556,0.0002446369,0.000020369936,0.000004492815,0.00008111246,0.000013561788,0.0000026616303,0.99135596,0.0031092102,0.0011162639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025941836,0.00002546797,0.0019261339,0.0009879897,0.0000125448705,0.0000072749654,0.000012632847,0.000030496967,0.000014205185,0.17197545,0.82440215,0.00034623768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015920543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04021605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93848306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005944249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015751653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280574016","doi":"10.1177/14737795211055781","title":"Friendly judicial challenges from the North: The decision of the Canada Supreme Court in <i>Nevsun Resources Ltd v Araya</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Doctrine; Political science; Common law; State (computer science); International law; Customary international law; Judicial opinion; Choice of law; Jurisdiction; Public international law","score_opus":0.02675376037311372,"score_gpt":0.2758997364705553,"score_spread":0.2491459760974416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280574016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3427912,0.26815706,6.792139e-7,0.17745543,0.002263971,0.001631928,0.00024337182,0.000028909033,0.20742746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858088,0.0066860076,0.0000043430664,0.006323757,0.0002612109,0.000051343286,0.000007793122,0.000008194721,0.0008485452],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99718565,0.0010089043,0.00039722412,0.00017676833,0.0010310686,0.00020039288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979854,0.0012181159,0.00022776533,0.00046295355,0.00007092344,0.000034821114],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012180787,0.00010919109,0.0002647982,0.000013972485,0.0015939006,0.000033243825,0.0017105486,0.000016097181,0.00075251836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000062348634,0.00005313143,0.00012523854,0.0002394669,0.0003573083,0.000054850505,0.0002997472,0.0003746753,0.000005025308],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009825624,0.000028545866,0.0011328725,0.000019713525,0.000014793004,0.000003746002,0.0013233072,0.000012924544,2.2580099e-7,0.9628896,0.032280926,0.0022835247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007464244,0.000007930894,0.011849001,0.00049421395,0.000024445719,4.428145e-7,0.0001600142,0.0000019633835,0.0000020026532,0.027377216,0.95993495,0.00007319786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6741211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93551236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017299739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027647015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280587145","doi":"10.1177/14737795211070838","title":"Strike-out Appeals, Unjust Enrichment, and Discoverability: Insights from Kenya","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Unjust enrichment; Appeal; Political science; Common law; Mistake; Subject (documents); High Court; Tribunal; Interlocutory; Restitution","score_opus":0.03943548343380984,"score_gpt":0.33616096039292775,"score_spread":0.2967254769591179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280587145","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010858033,0.43638262,0.00006479219,0.040302467,0.00048411792,0.0021529573,0.00025274805,0.00017667562,0.50932556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9557697,0.035450485,0.000056475037,0.0044766236,0.00014575556,0.00021838542,0.00007215195,0.000010844227,0.0037995733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841154,0.00045715962,0.00030084804,0.00030168955,0.0003175418,0.00021125407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991016,0.00019127919,0.00012746576,0.00042297598,0.000021804773,0.00013488895],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045729987,0.00011371257,0.00030136426,0.00002017785,0.0015061956,0.00010757264,0.00039676632,0.000017381886,0.0009932976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020349662,0.00010023646,0.00008285593,0.00039820897,0.00021115264,0.00021741698,0.00042767447,0.0002499682,0.000046792557],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020084215,0.00009363313,0.0008948001,0.00011626355,0.000013622087,0.0000016501447,0.0005955021,0.0000015579664,0.000008099313,0.979531,0.00892611,0.009815753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009036079,0.000009350925,0.00047311684,0.00015945075,0.000045076533,1.7250223e-7,0.00017025277,0.0000038506873,0.0000029945033,0.018002562,0.980913,0.00012980895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005575647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028664894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9719869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012630003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006847327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294946013","doi":"10.1177/14737795211071100","title":"Religious-based discrimination in the commercial context on the basis of sexual orientation: A comparative perspective","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisdiction; Statutory law; Sexual orientation; Context (archaeology); Political science; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Position (finance); Economics; Gender studies","score_opus":0.09479652478794733,"score_gpt":0.3980609167522519,"score_spread":0.3032643919643046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294946013","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0095577035,0.022349278,0.000034186483,0.18102546,0.00029068664,0.0018994551,0.00014995648,0.000025245217,0.784668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97638255,0.00041535983,0.000009740054,0.022719724,0.00005407041,0.0001686535,0.000019439634,0.0000029196106,0.00022752194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99700195,0.0020358614,0.00024189793,0.00012647001,0.0004621374,0.0001316743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99762785,0.0018596374,0.00017280402,0.00020555766,0.00010855189,0.000025617568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001177495,0.000081808,0.00023317356,0.000031934258,0.0008831861,0.000019251333,0.00036837277,0.000009442705,0.00034158796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010278835,0.000052133615,0.000063824664,0.0006585532,0.0010638038,0.00004650961,0.000035149715,0.00023739014,0.0000074126756],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014618998,0.00009760075,0.00023867429,0.000030113772,0.000006422538,0.0000013922037,0.006984014,0.000023351062,1.9029657e-7,0.9790804,0.012965791,0.000557463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016317848,0.00012659555,0.0005146049,0.0002643367,0.00006143232,6.239634e-7,0.03782009,0.000009051235,0.0000064133264,0.0035241805,0.9574062,0.00010325005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00793664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04049974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9755562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022790967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035439568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388570607","doi":"10.1177/14737795231213379","title":"On the meaning of <i>bankruptcy</i> : ‘Old–new’ lexicon in corporate insolvency law in the Commonwealth Caribbean","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Bankruptcy; Statute; Law; Legislation; Political science; Statutory interpretation; Business","score_opus":0.08034363034968427,"score_gpt":0.2724706067729859,"score_spread":0.19212697642330162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388570607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19847323,0.06567322,0.00000949863,0.123334125,0.0014729855,0.0053688874,0.000045345736,0.00038119007,0.60524154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9565037,0.004616386,0.000008328263,0.038210057,0.00017706963,0.00007042599,0.000041604442,0.00003138503,0.00034106232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782634,0.00017823445,0.00085087406,0.00031705233,0.00043054213,0.00039695512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99766093,0.0004720977,0.0009393249,0.0008551375,0.000057115078,0.000015377209],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024959538,0.00027824048,0.00061541994,0.00013312738,0.0002097323,0.000115105184,0.0010269913,0.000046322282,0.00010690492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009288279,0.00017410521,0.00015483126,0.0030989018,0.00015887778,0.00045687216,0.00024414476,0.00057319936,0.00024311912],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017291128,0.00008021898,0.007325133,0.0012038341,0.000006379882,0.000034514032,0.00007617036,0.000047265366,0.000008484243,0.9572866,0.03158622,0.002327879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066478713,0.000033159573,0.013990195,0.014014907,0.0000630251,0.0000021952362,0.00009690042,0.00030276013,0.00003275358,0.2676389,0.7027243,0.00043617943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0119269295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11573707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7580305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042543357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043957214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99465275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}