{"meta":{"query_hash":"e9e247888741","filters":{"venue":"Common Law World Review"},"cohort_total":46,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":46,"exported":46,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/e9e247888741","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Common+Law+World+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1965119976","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2011.40.2.0221","title":"The Taxation Exemption of Canadian Indians as Governments and Individuals: How Does This Compare with Australia and New Zealand?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Legislation; Politics; Political science; Scholarship; Indigenous rights; Mainstream; Public economics; Law and economics; Economic growth; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.06146543550668151,"score_gpt":0.311952177566374,"score_spread":0.2504867420596925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965119976","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15038134,0.30290458,0.0005837274,0.09774968,0.0017545127,0.00010969942,0.00033104184,0.000020653919,0.44616476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7483627,0.21274449,0.00069725234,0.010365772,0.00031370448,0.000046277477,0.00017751394,0.000020924463,0.027271349],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964049,0.00053831853,0.000099836696,0.00021513947,0.0016058261,0.0011360426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99736303,0.00046774108,0.00020985353,0.000092227085,0.001482985,0.0003841883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003641147,0.0002138794,0.00054709276,0.0028690842,0.0067039076,0.0067708157,0.0013163257,0.001135675,0.0022112338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072319666,0.00014698133,0.00044670526,0.0054898,0.0052688206,0.0027071754,0.0022008973,0.0019840535,0.00015191217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017084258,0.000075046,0.021224974,0.0017024968,0.000102359954,0.000736035,0.05704875,0.00048436914,0.0004860359,0.5669759,0.04507937,0.30591378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034929904,0.00006623362,0.080895744,0.0024238473,0.0001880696,0.00031293934,0.067946315,0.00020103974,0.00033949973,0.010980518,0.8365134,0.00009737318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98214895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9900746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043443132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043443132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09609708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31520343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970983722","doi":"10.1350/clwr.33.1.35.25831","title":"The Law in Undercover Policing: A Comparative Study of Entrapment and Covert Interviewing in Australia, Canada and Europe","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Covert; Entrapment; Interview; Law; Political science; Perspective (graphical); Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.13727744968855873,"score_gpt":0.4025959515357165,"score_spread":0.2653185018471578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970983722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98086447,0.004643176,0.00030442682,0.002062242,0.00005334423,0.0000625459,0.00005495081,0.0000047002072,0.011950126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99154234,0.0045094434,0.00035726526,0.0006982777,0.000020653877,0.00003290734,0.000076272394,0.00001281509,0.0027499401],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98359966,0.005640109,0.00053924444,0.0007480358,0.0051893727,0.004283628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9728373,0.010135412,0.00423329,0.0007891547,0.008763153,0.0032416326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010464913,0.00030419073,0.0011618027,0.007481526,0.017623648,0.0072517814,0.0021448405,0.0016776028,0.0018937933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03741311,0.0006004342,0.00041698394,0.014805335,0.00976778,0.0030221057,0.00666173,0.0022495494,0.00016871003],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002636924,0.00026328393,0.13399665,0.00051104435,0.00010405166,0.0024935699,0.7679507,0.0004615285,0.00075096096,0.0155071085,0.0033408604,0.07435657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012953292,0.00008920169,0.409576,0.0006129185,0.000044161745,0.0005577441,0.56243795,0.00045010092,0.00037638392,0.0007838771,0.024982618,0.00007605286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9708246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9871933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057573766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057573766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.087001234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41772884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973438824","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2013.42.3.0255","title":"An Empirical Analysis of Appeals by Class Members in Australia's Federal Class Actions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Class action; Supreme court; Class (philosophy); Political science; Law; State (computer science); Computer science","score_opus":0.06604056206683592,"score_gpt":0.3625630145899187,"score_spread":0.29652245252308274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973438824","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99208826,0.00007688491,0.000065173575,0.00047317104,0.000005916623,0.0000358996,0.0000351052,0.0000016088072,0.007217966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971181,0.00009715742,0.00003743156,0.00011841644,0.000013974845,0.00002486268,0.000035623285,0.0000014430553,0.002552931],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925262,0.002426287,0.00036418746,0.0004809971,0.0023031838,0.0018991185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9367233,0.032493737,0.018599657,0.0013169693,0.0053383107,0.005528032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061008655,0.00013713243,0.0004079385,0.002535724,0.0043756883,0.003218824,0.0012917055,0.0014852845,0.0061775167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05164397,0.0002759897,0.00028091876,0.0027403906,0.003278525,0.002214836,0.002434902,0.0039176173,0.0007664871],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003040408,0.0019166332,0.7997002,0.0001049474,0.00007755203,0.0010790917,0.13826998,0.0004717182,0.0005558745,0.025598139,0.0060062767,0.025915537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012232762,0.00016048492,0.9447038,0.00005476741,0.000023322387,0.00012502955,0.048589148,0.00074484275,0.00012022792,0.0006470689,0.0048010084,0.000018078123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13448647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16370492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13448647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063004075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039554564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26740736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974073694","doi":"10.1350/clwr.34.1.1.60195","title":"Takeover Bid Transactions and Information Asymmetry: Assessment of the Efficiency of the Investment and Securities Act 1999","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shareholder; Legislature; Business; Database transaction; Information asymmetry; Legislation; Accounting; Tender offer; Investment (military); Value (mathematics); Inside information; Finance; Law; Corporate governance; Political science","score_opus":0.011740361548406464,"score_gpt":0.23193387340331723,"score_spread":0.22019351185491076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974073694","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8783622,0.0013564092,0.0067213727,0.0021334044,0.000020073134,0.00021215947,0.00032428297,0.000016472186,0.110853724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974451,0.00038953946,0.0006886966,0.00010723027,0.00002300198,0.000031263753,0.000104691346,0.0000048028082,0.0012057822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98614144,0.006656806,0.00087677606,0.00028278746,0.0051940824,0.0008481812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80710214,0.14683028,0.03143931,0.005918748,0.00783089,0.00087870075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014947296,0.00024087724,0.00043479027,0.0026443906,0.00075678393,0.0039757066,0.00058394566,0.0011645373,0.002789929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.081660464,0.00023097619,0.00043559796,0.002799264,0.003438284,0.0046400507,0.0014607573,0.0014574163,0.00040193714],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019850624,0.0012439297,0.35978872,0.00030181406,0.0002784926,0.0009249794,0.0041286703,0.031484574,0.0015203042,0.46516305,0.005144139,0.12803625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040729478,0.0025480236,0.61131966,0.0007595695,0.0005361504,0.0022299679,0.0095182285,0.12285723,0.009994723,0.21325153,0.026391532,0.0001861242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027910753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002918804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014947296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023589681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017378738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.079049826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988242259","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2006.35.3.197","title":"Occupiers' Liability in England and Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Liability; Legislature; Law; Tort; Position (finance); Political science; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.021784751265324344,"score_gpt":0.3100154524167192,"score_spread":0.2882307011513948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988242259","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56925696,0.24221878,0.00042354787,0.051248953,0.0006681568,0.00009430823,0.0022819024,0.00003531591,0.13377213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8957691,0.08043797,0.0002799405,0.0053371433,0.00014906669,0.000022142314,0.0005870264,0.000014673343,0.01740287],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99501956,0.00030179866,0.00023660675,0.0003507813,0.0025522977,0.0015389696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98809624,0.0018870251,0.0015237777,0.00013381618,0.006538108,0.0018211639],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002505742,0.00016820339,0.00048636043,0.0038990076,0.0042521977,0.0043228013,0.0011257076,0.0014502812,0.0031294045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0103111565,0.00040157366,0.00029794936,0.0062576793,0.0026061002,0.00097035733,0.0014904935,0.0015449057,0.0001708912],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00081184,0.00018606787,0.24994987,0.0034289034,0.00032211284,0.004706312,0.036360282,0.004871609,0.0019138505,0.22842863,0.13080555,0.33821496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006666672,0.000104390405,0.68660206,0.0019194403,0.00020103631,0.00050913077,0.013545638,0.00039537714,0.0004726231,0.0017584646,0.29426485,0.00016034878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99665916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99880266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11045995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11045995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15522723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8014468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996598757","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2010.39.1.0191","title":"Special Issue on Being, Becoming and Belonging: Multiculturalism, Diversity and Social Inclusion in Modern Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Inclusion (mineral); Diversity (politics); Political science; Sociology; Cultural diversity; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.017360683680552946,"score_gpt":0.26079746287315947,"score_spread":0.24343677919260653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996598757","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043021594,0.56076217,0.0003620205,0.19019836,0.18347695,0.00017027065,0.0029344321,0.00010879772,0.05768486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05122934,0.646891,0.0007762539,0.0437417,0.1115521,0.00023273894,0.003435769,0.00018409813,0.14195704],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99637187,0.00020343123,0.00023720165,0.0002164197,0.0021575133,0.00081363413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9787926,0.0032871163,0.00074089266,0.0004662264,0.01363091,0.003082155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039054558,0.0011469595,0.002662662,0.010254495,0.00783514,0.01092496,0.004120269,0.006328538,0.026719024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01038824,0.00054985826,0.0010537098,0.014600124,0.004634861,0.004205971,0.0025117346,0.0040563717,0.001859032],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021920605,0.000031916992,0.00091060426,0.0008573859,0.000027693943,0.00006475855,0.0005250505,0.00007208537,0.00006888268,0.005061388,0.9664875,0.025870876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007801221,0.000014475694,0.009367989,0.0012574112,0.00007915889,0.00007833745,0.002140617,0.000076191,0.00006327917,0.0017144495,0.9851635,0.00003686901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91938573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9659087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08061427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045304667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15909913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32870996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998545607","doi":"10.1350/clwr.33.2.130.36494","title":"Re-Examining Public Policy—A Case for Conditional Fees in Singapore?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public policy; Political science; Law and economics; Common law; Law; Public administration; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.14089845902713205,"score_gpt":0.4197903388280506,"score_spread":0.27889187980091856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998545607","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04246542,0.057490923,0.0026684261,0.77135396,0.0018646871,0.000057456295,0.0004165684,0.000044187025,0.12363828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77039015,0.046742763,0.002163308,0.14709334,0.0016288692,0.00011728339,0.00022665123,0.000049142578,0.031588446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905566,0.005167593,0.00066158216,0.0006319366,0.0019845876,0.0009976397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98056626,0.010581367,0.001858582,0.001207373,0.004727814,0.0010585589],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017723028,0.00027775276,0.00070059096,0.0020385126,0.0030399212,0.0095537435,0.0012734102,0.008504847,0.004471493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028160477,0.00024232385,0.0008475452,0.0034773946,0.007922692,0.011427171,0.003906764,0.006750973,0.0006906843],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003672352,0.00002776577,0.002147035,0.00041644427,0.000044243487,0.0004721943,0.0029440762,0.00054370594,0.00017247304,0.9066323,0.056228172,0.030334886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005217289,0.000068896006,0.010812723,0.001880745,0.000107545355,0.00028991507,0.006451798,0.0013190235,0.0006591037,0.34093487,0.63734144,0.00008173633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.089766406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10954376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.089766406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01285045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02923984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17848784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006854857","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2010.39.1.0193","title":"The Impact on the Inuit of Environmental Degradation to the Canadian Arctic","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Human settlement; Arctic; Environmental degradation; Government (linguistics); Environmental planning; Natural resource economics; Climate change; Geography; Population; Environmental protection; Biodiversity; Environmental resource management; Business; Economics; Ecology; Environmental health","score_opus":0.03890383994598605,"score_gpt":0.37198562794729545,"score_spread":0.3330817880013094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006854857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57207155,0.08269036,0.00034036054,0.0828219,0.00074521586,0.00005833879,0.00031718254,0.000018246354,0.26093677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9507421,0.035680503,0.00015272333,0.004876322,0.00010911782,0.000007405237,0.00006649508,0.000005670751,0.0083596585],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99723035,0.00047997804,0.0000531341,0.00011916743,0.0008777802,0.001239537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99617094,0.000652406,0.0003675938,0.00006228315,0.0019396538,0.0008071334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002477384,0.00015889674,0.00020846566,0.0012601286,0.0109834615,0.0038057957,0.0008529144,0.001017094,0.0022253343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00487533,0.00008356287,0.00016879626,0.0021622858,0.004467504,0.0006623568,0.0018789289,0.0010161705,0.000100756835],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033584682,0.0002389524,0.16344395,0.0025975446,0.00015550615,0.0054622344,0.19307402,0.0021889845,0.0026246444,0.12059382,0.10419996,0.40508452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001619796,0.00016273683,0.25407988,0.0018391614,0.00018676101,0.0010274369,0.2886899,0.0004929146,0.00090351654,0.0053680427,0.44714332,0.00009005027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98552793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9939084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03490972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03490972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10420992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25328898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010008752","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2012.41.2.0236","title":"Racial Vilification and Freedom of Speech in Australia and Elsewhere","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Offensive; Law; Charter; Legislature; Context (archaeology); Political science; Politics; Government (linguistics); Democracy; Legislation; Freedom of information; Sociology; Law and economics; History; Linguistics; Economics","score_opus":0.03108574647807879,"score_gpt":0.30010409840855523,"score_spread":0.26901835193047646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010008752","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6295615,0.021500846,0.0023456002,0.022087099,0.00036984475,0.000079444326,0.000058533344,0.000021228161,0.3239759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835308,0.0029371763,0.0003399788,0.0023288783,0.00010858032,0.000025834717,0.0000133595,0.0000058012565,0.010709572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944871,0.0025131456,0.00025214793,0.0005614949,0.001265522,0.0009205644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914637,0.0039154286,0.0016909466,0.00045993875,0.0016134826,0.0008564533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004735106,0.00013254405,0.0004545847,0.0019165812,0.0048417253,0.0038179834,0.0005894265,0.0014696409,0.003245999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014027171,0.00019135319,0.00022255593,0.0013043098,0.008354297,0.002676476,0.003884818,0.002455393,0.0002549459],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012613375,0.00019158226,0.04331172,0.00059556914,0.000098004,0.0014477775,0.1287874,0.00091444515,0.0021815887,0.60196036,0.008142732,0.21224268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040363586,0.00043224037,0.45187756,0.0017564632,0.00020469801,0.0008657005,0.042774204,0.0014499013,0.0024854576,0.10786025,0.39011365,0.00013946176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.104242705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16596937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.104242705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047347085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071925856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20727193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024612190","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2010.39.1.0195","title":"Speech, Equality, and Citizenship in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Hatred; Xenophobia; Human rights; Racism; Law; Incitement; Terrorism; Sociology; Sedition; Criticism; Political science; Criminology; Citizenship; Politics","score_opus":0.019617307612958202,"score_gpt":0.25944653486200536,"score_spread":0.23982922724904715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024612190","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54395366,0.0056020073,0.0003270077,0.08831483,0.00092449307,0.00011397586,0.0018721101,0.000071258735,0.35882065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.892472,0.001563189,0.00023641081,0.0040036933,0.000064017615,0.000026052488,0.00033032973,0.00003043986,0.10127374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970049,0.00021755185,0.000058990296,0.00022551804,0.000660028,0.0018330178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957372,0.00032637906,0.00012883238,0.00007060409,0.0010850632,0.0026519229],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012432052,0.0001850501,0.00054819207,0.0013861648,0.028642902,0.008378342,0.0016513513,0.0015943227,0.021516286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036053052,0.00018483055,0.0003512626,0.0030280552,0.0053117773,0.0019287677,0.0045932685,0.0030013851,0.0007118104],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021524784,0.0003948571,0.118458085,0.00023751715,0.000063409614,0.0017390223,0.12118196,0.0006859589,0.00045784336,0.44715026,0.1698212,0.13959463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052592153,0.00007914362,0.19246408,0.00038249628,0.000052899755,0.0002561042,0.18181913,0.0009939342,0.0004755646,0.014025254,0.60925186,0.00014699239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99719775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14985372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14985372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23640776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9860492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033759486","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2010.39.4.0211","title":"Getting to Grips with the Shareholder Value Theory in Corporate Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shareholder value; Shareholder; Shareholder primacy; Corporate law; Value (mathematics); Stakeholder; Corporate governance; Stakeholder theory; Law and economics; Shareholder resolution; Business; Accounting; Shareholder loan; Law; Economics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.04901545279999093,"score_gpt":0.2369588806333884,"score_spread":0.1879434278333975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033759486","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021732425,0.079856634,0.10949601,0.5761514,0.0041231476,0.00006852871,0.00008933968,0.00011233859,0.20837025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.772853,0.06538343,0.045729056,0.06663253,0.01725098,0.00028887347,0.00014076261,0.00027092907,0.031450395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98597175,0.008163187,0.00038700693,0.0010472791,0.0036053904,0.00082532776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96904254,0.0260952,0.000983451,0.001221593,0.0018435821,0.00081370433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018697063,0.0008813168,0.0015179927,0.0036239745,0.0056149806,0.014571907,0.0024675168,0.010657401,0.0050818496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0233022,0.00067276176,0.0011617966,0.0033892002,0.0817236,0.04229656,0.006044685,0.023856254,0.0015408017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029934238,0.000010160518,0.000081350496,0.000027780028,0.0000023611963,0.00002726122,0.0008285541,0.00012543594,0.000026282898,0.9935196,0.0017878967,0.0035602227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041998064,0.000007969413,0.00008130686,0.00011072431,0.0000013879002,0.000016446496,0.00040560352,0.00026561657,0.000038319675,0.98635536,0.012705858,0.000007203014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058652605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042054136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018697063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009537829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060473443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09888071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037436209","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2010.39.1.0196","title":"Professor Waldron Goes to Canada (One More Time): The Canadian Charter and the Counter-Majoritarian Difficulty","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitution; Political science; Judicial review; Law; Legitimacy; Legislature; State (computer science); Law and economics; Separation of powers; Bill of rights; Power (physics); Constitutional law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.01689867215698869,"score_gpt":0.29956660198958646,"score_spread":0.28266792983259775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037436209","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009837596,0.023906244,0.0003227676,0.9591307,0.0055066943,0.000009225218,0.00003931,0.000012189883,0.010089014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10301928,0.031494465,0.001669967,0.7971985,0.010038095,0.0000361835,0.00005117302,0.00008139332,0.05641095],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99163,0.0015610476,0.00029314213,0.0012148075,0.004090532,0.0012102989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98592025,0.00615485,0.0004912843,0.00031690748,0.005528907,0.0015878222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009288014,0.00042693576,0.0008085419,0.002043036,0.01345699,0.010619494,0.0022981502,0.0127346255,0.004209461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026428593,0.00036732192,0.00053557754,0.002691027,0.02176608,0.006611433,0.0020342292,0.013667077,0.00064455764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026872256,0.000008896993,0.001057992,0.00010259502,0.000017728595,0.00023433179,0.002590488,0.00010167446,0.00012327262,0.25231045,0.720446,0.022979645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002181175,0.0000131588795,0.0023076062,0.0003387266,0.000021389465,0.000143305,0.0019903413,0.00019112937,0.00019217558,0.035937663,0.9587594,0.00008341968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8550801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9233485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14491987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042621206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07634185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30923998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048502062","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2011.40.1.0215","title":"Federal Spending Power in Three Federations: Australia, Canada and the United States","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Local Government Finance and Decentralization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Constitution; Government (linguistics); Political science; Context (archaeology); Power (physics); Separation of powers; Public administration; Enumerated powers; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.06634757656485094,"score_gpt":0.31226929780729945,"score_spread":0.24592172124244852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048502062","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8528687,0.0050028036,0.00073236244,0.005954709,0.00010958697,0.00011586628,0.0004118977,0.000025555668,0.13477859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99277884,0.0012325048,0.000507464,0.0004830461,0.0000130648905,0.000031490574,0.00017768038,0.000003963645,0.004772],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99700147,0.0002933831,0.00006635332,0.00012027667,0.0009579878,0.0015605348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966702,0.00036625948,0.00043584802,0.00011237689,0.0014235369,0.0009919292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022039665,0.00018117142,0.00034310107,0.003394181,0.009742819,0.003938833,0.00061039627,0.0007220526,0.0013189863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054465076,0.00018032281,0.00037269862,0.0048159827,0.0036677925,0.0012707647,0.0022870556,0.0014064729,0.00006062596],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002505087,0.00009466635,0.10980055,0.00016257114,0.00011514902,0.0007525632,0.02386305,0.0023032287,0.0006668275,0.78542423,0.0124564925,0.06411021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074963515,0.00009492866,0.81386197,0.00030315484,0.00013605296,0.00029093694,0.029027173,0.0021369362,0.000783374,0.021093458,0.13206236,0.00013472127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95962226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9757646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04303417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04303417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05467388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3122362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051668494","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2013.42.1.0248","title":"The Seizure of Illicit Assets: Patterns of Civil Forfeiture in Canada and Ireland","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Parallels; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; State (computer science); Organised crime; Criminology; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.013649186369903024,"score_gpt":0.2781071660239265,"score_spread":0.26445797965402346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051668494","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98739326,0.0015689336,0.00008314984,0.0011953628,0.000013433238,0.00006613686,0.0026257536,0.000020032252,0.0070338505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935992,0.0011715459,0.00010177767,0.00023443504,0.000006216992,0.000021806583,0.0014249367,0.000022501245,0.003417706],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99735284,0.00018299215,0.00015782073,0.0003374575,0.0006430767,0.0013259095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901158,0.00062200404,0.002183381,0.00029934366,0.0047089527,0.0020705122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011695921,0.00043180006,0.0008927091,0.006628181,0.003990722,0.00488858,0.0031063685,0.0012217159,0.0043743504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065931133,0.00047860286,0.0008303489,0.012616891,0.0030340957,0.001322456,0.003422826,0.0014886722,0.000604013],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005154344,0.00013107607,0.9310612,0.00018763251,0.00014707823,0.00060612574,0.020950513,0.0004836808,0.00047164105,0.0033784015,0.007581657,0.034485586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013998214,0.000036703645,0.96306974,0.00011860291,0.000037908634,0.00018322583,0.030464498,0.00044350445,0.00013539867,0.0001280366,0.0053016357,0.00006686568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9963483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99826366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08445993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08445993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.067774005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61280257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053793258","doi":"10.1350/clwr.33.2.103.36495","title":"Alcohol Provider Liability in Canada and the United Kingdom: Legal and Cultural Influences","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Bar Association","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Duty of care; Duty; Business; Duty to protect; Law; Harm; Paternalism; Legal liability; Political science","score_opus":0.07425810013670905,"score_gpt":0.36264346837789413,"score_spread":0.2883853682411851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053793258","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6511126,0.12893932,0.0005867609,0.10541479,0.00062083243,0.00015162311,0.0013957624,0.00003163135,0.111746736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.965989,0.02190388,0.000311365,0.008125258,0.000077175624,0.000022692297,0.00020567766,0.000019189254,0.003345689],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98402286,0.002526507,0.0011156389,0.00092183094,0.007517887,0.0038951358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9223146,0.020869976,0.011845446,0.0010710356,0.034724195,0.009174841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007729454,0.00020259888,0.0005923626,0.0057954993,0.009762205,0.0069461763,0.0016666751,0.0020113478,0.0036539359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050731644,0.0004449628,0.00048767994,0.010489066,0.0070186383,0.0016178956,0.0029703674,0.0027108998,0.00017925394],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051170273,0.00018498141,0.55965805,0.0016361718,0.00034059616,0.0027871425,0.0583799,0.0013222403,0.00055933115,0.16504805,0.07248393,0.1370879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006461233,0.000059246446,0.81174076,0.0025241275,0.00023014685,0.00083234406,0.047780726,0.0004076668,0.00042887765,0.0032629536,0.13249902,0.0001694073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9922712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99636465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12799495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12799495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14703725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92867273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056126759","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2009.38.1.0181","title":"Relocating Officially Induced Error of Law: Fitting the Remedy to the Wrong","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministry of Fisheries, New Zealand","keywords":"Mistake; Excuse; Law; Jurisdiction; Ignorance; Supreme court; Political science; Commission; State (computer science); Criminal law; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.13175978513366343,"score_gpt":0.4190385052998113,"score_spread":0.28727872016614786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056126759","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08861848,0.0075514833,0.2765144,0.3738156,0.0062507764,0.0002946257,0.00009092173,0.00088993914,0.2459737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8939389,0.0031209548,0.039472096,0.04639027,0.0014624308,0.00020425183,0.00004621604,0.00023361377,0.015131274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95162493,0.021577299,0.0039768526,0.005025966,0.014691549,0.0031033168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9146846,0.040706936,0.009037644,0.020086467,0.01372397,0.0017603132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042405996,0.00050279207,0.0011056525,0.002960317,0.005866228,0.012915298,0.0043491162,0.019046387,0.0027301642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15437768,0.0007009015,0.0011151764,0.0014470476,0.03613413,0.015321065,0.010010125,0.014070293,0.00088253117],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000210738,0.000081888145,0.0024667229,0.00015394685,0.0000311743,0.00042128513,0.0061308057,0.0005073328,0.00047974155,0.94402295,0.0075735827,0.038109336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000094102346,0.00024064025,0.0023444667,0.0017659352,0.00010295398,0.0012761113,0.0070226034,0.0028018642,0.002857528,0.8680575,0.1133106,0.00012580342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00601883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008194177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042405996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034331505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020497734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.224267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056925861","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2014.43.1.0262","title":"Necessity: Duress of Circumstances or Moral Involuntariness?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excuse; Element (criminal law); Law; Supreme court; Welsh; Courage; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.064879815500039,"score_gpt":0.3696249763636343,"score_spread":0.30474516086359527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056925861","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25438476,0.084759824,0.05115175,0.21405745,0.0033146753,0.00018850956,0.00026459992,0.000098503515,0.39178002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985213,0.004231847,0.002050185,0.0041666296,0.00054871,0.000037760492,0.00002817338,0.000010857362,0.0037128606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99481356,0.0022896435,0.00043861003,0.00055209984,0.0012361864,0.0006698102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864137,0.007506121,0.0023298995,0.0013041095,0.0015256207,0.00092057517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009093154,0.0002446528,0.00070219586,0.0013648395,0.0017833012,0.00433003,0.0011159765,0.0032923503,0.0018321484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027060933,0.00023499707,0.00047996885,0.0008894162,0.03431818,0.009668304,0.0026152013,0.004588039,0.00022357747],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025673273,0.000009202912,0.0017080685,0.00015402847,0.000012795257,0.0001707286,0.0047822963,0.0000785277,0.00024004829,0.97872305,0.001738677,0.012356922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024657409,0.00011437301,0.014324768,0.0011099915,0.000037270194,0.0010123842,0.008775821,0.00042824828,0.0003454902,0.9007514,0.07298788,0.000087652355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0088048475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013710155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009093154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039150524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053036506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048089743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058171737","doi":"10.1350/clwr.34.1.39.60192","title":"Liability of Churches and Religious Organizations for Sexual Abuse of Children by Ministers of Religion","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Law; Sexual abuse; Child sexual abuse; Criminology; Political science; Sociology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.013865548917249315,"score_gpt":0.3113998388421154,"score_spread":0.2975342899248661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058171737","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30922508,0.11504056,0.00208655,0.20580348,0.0016517747,0.0001447788,0.0002912235,0.000026063079,0.36573052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88406694,0.04051602,0.0011080579,0.04912115,0.0012301444,0.000056134122,0.00009223839,0.000011758241,0.023797598],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923114,0.00344111,0.00046948512,0.00039319028,0.0020546967,0.0013300511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98618907,0.008858868,0.0021093872,0.00037536552,0.0016939773,0.00077325135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008847016,0.00013151322,0.00033036998,0.0015136725,0.005824343,0.0034955766,0.0011056234,0.006970077,0.0019986988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01860245,0.00043728855,0.0005120941,0.0010101314,0.005333589,0.0020186652,0.0025677348,0.0043944763,0.00032705534],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005627115,0.00009857545,0.030732563,0.0007231559,0.000072068535,0.0067699607,0.026660044,0.00074024574,0.0017576772,0.81744075,0.048819546,0.066129155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006516471,0.00022084707,0.063609645,0.002375178,0.00014292791,0.0035607717,0.020474868,0.0004025806,0.0015926472,0.07142445,0.8359978,0.0001330216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07837903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14721432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07837903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037438017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011095355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15584564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075245561","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2009.38.4.0199","title":"Extending Time Limits in Sexual Abuse Cases: A Critical Comparative Evaluation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Sexual abuse; Law; Quality (philosophy); Political science; Criminology; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.19722759302727283,"score_gpt":0.49206616615775356,"score_spread":0.29483857313048073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075245561","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3165116,0.5514988,0.010262923,0.0150022125,0.0025344258,0.05114789,0.002007073,0.000040397208,0.050994754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8482417,0.10460829,0.013661337,0.006111887,0.0017433243,0.022432057,0.0005872362,0.00004212862,0.002572164],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.843138,0.12951474,0.010732102,0.0021094494,0.011854857,0.002650843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.43724602,0.497811,0.016355658,0.0071298196,0.039992582,0.0014648656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17624357,0.001074031,0.002717132,0.02073788,0.0063148458,0.0042435494,0.003611508,0.0051939413,0.009448104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2868904,0.001019531,0.003060897,0.020403381,0.0082080625,0.009910277,0.005161217,0.0028223188,0.00041981536],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.027577633,0.00451987,0.028566249,0.20256338,0.007211719,0.003496401,0.13594583,0.0023033186,0.0024083145,0.17909381,0.016632073,0.38968146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00840903,0.034232434,0.07783421,0.19524851,0.036246773,0.0033268675,0.30050358,0.0027906636,0.0050375867,0.069218114,0.2662865,0.0008656887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017068358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045381196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17624357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029293528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012790248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9320762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082111201","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2009.38.2.0183","title":"The Meanings of Dishonesty in Theft","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dishonesty; CLARITY; Term (time); Element (criminal law); Political science; Law; Criminology; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.025974980099011405,"score_gpt":0.35769158446168114,"score_spread":0.33171660436266975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082111201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24459746,0.15254661,0.020174047,0.08191801,0.0019728546,0.00005885945,0.00012856685,0.000026509242,0.49857712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97325057,0.017974893,0.00078601466,0.0025524974,0.00063617964,0.00002161293,0.000016751455,0.000018040892,0.004743445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98531544,0.008983812,0.0006104705,0.00058917335,0.0036092843,0.00089182996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97417927,0.019072773,0.0024822159,0.0013867727,0.0023296298,0.00054943754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00919058,0.00045942454,0.00062293484,0.0064253104,0.005856143,0.01230169,0.0011795278,0.0039006895,0.0021490965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025430007,0.00036977607,0.00029783093,0.0051198024,0.082359076,0.01567465,0.007631494,0.0052914238,0.00021170078],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017430131,0.000006250557,0.00060627447,0.0001034839,0.0000045605793,0.00023161362,0.017950116,0.00011015499,0.000064795146,0.9699588,0.0012203138,0.009726227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012084405,0.000032764405,0.00391489,0.0014619448,0.000017348917,0.00071356294,0.022017973,0.00032508085,0.00024317496,0.89092475,0.080289714,0.000046746485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011495593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010411689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01230169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077412464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044514784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056166887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085829298","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2008.37.1.9","title":"An Analysis of the Auditors' Liability to Third Parties in Australia","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Insurance and Financial Risk Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indemnity; Seriousness; Liability; Audit; Statutory law; Corporation; Government (linguistics); Business; Law; Liability insurance; Political science; Accounting","score_opus":0.057589131680176577,"score_gpt":0.28960666066550156,"score_spread":0.232017528985325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085829298","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9559067,0.002662834,0.0031080022,0.0013032745,0.000012413738,0.000067653855,0.000079204365,0.000009715448,0.036850195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936977,0.0012262658,0.00060592964,0.00012100179,0.000017362161,0.000020317791,0.000042789536,0.0000027294761,0.004265926],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99582964,0.0010848917,0.00024868888,0.00019097992,0.0020325684,0.0006132536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921949,0.002748145,0.0023326175,0.00022180246,0.0020565095,0.00044611286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027517527,0.00017069707,0.00041889233,0.003478849,0.0013675166,0.001987204,0.00046733135,0.0006523308,0.001263223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009655445,0.0003167756,0.000607598,0.0022319602,0.0010774164,0.00109206,0.001913141,0.00086371857,0.00015847232],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043693275,0.00036009282,0.4944329,0.00093617395,0.00037096167,0.008832125,0.026021529,0.048271038,0.006098185,0.23913746,0.0061413036,0.16896138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003022109,0.0003575508,0.88144344,0.0005495063,0.00030237422,0.0027056693,0.009135523,0.04032264,0.0018347228,0.025340898,0.037904277,0.00007320869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058795854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06285778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058795854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042334525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005339752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1169073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086930835","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2005.34.3.201","title":"Contingency Fee Agreements with Represented Persons in Class Actions—An Undesirable Australian Phenomenon","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Contingency; Statute; Law; Political science; Class (philosophy); Legislature; Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Commission; Business","score_opus":0.07017741307805546,"score_gpt":0.31321063370859503,"score_spread":0.24303322063053956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086930835","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38655102,0.013584387,0.012729188,0.02971007,0.00044311536,0.00022789357,0.00011149201,0.0000795255,0.55656326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.961103,0.0034448595,0.0019319173,0.0038450733,0.00013316107,0.00007174656,0.00003040224,0.0000151935765,0.029424692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9752661,0.0080149425,0.0011677431,0.0018117676,0.011226709,0.002512736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.966841,0.018325731,0.0065745297,0.0026323637,0.004584536,0.0010417914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0152647775,0.00013134327,0.00036339255,0.0030355803,0.009461246,0.0072355825,0.0015949483,0.0036794334,0.003166581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034585614,0.00049500604,0.00035452234,0.0044178353,0.009760818,0.0039358614,0.00489354,0.0045752646,0.00038239287],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019364445,0.000050683706,0.0076875165,0.00018063831,0.000022306202,0.0007920656,0.04085752,0.00022608468,0.0006552313,0.88020897,0.011254908,0.05804462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028945215,0.00013279685,0.0917369,0.00089154945,0.00009535371,0.0017413442,0.032982454,0.0011666736,0.002244279,0.113659814,0.75519395,0.00012600068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.094018824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16920327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.094018824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008392195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012946301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18694311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095517978","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2010.39.1.0194","title":"Twenty-Five Years of Disability Equality? Interpreting Disability Rights in the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Context (archaeology); Social rights; Medical model of disability; Sociology; Human rights; Psychology","score_opus":0.028048050940806524,"score_gpt":0.3496863337112039,"score_spread":0.32163828277039735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095517978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08978247,0.10002644,0.0029821808,0.32729077,0.0023378949,0.00010974629,0.0005902801,0.00004780544,0.4768324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91588867,0.02068881,0.0011337537,0.036319602,0.000588508,0.00005035266,0.00012853698,0.000043233853,0.025158614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98335373,0.0036094713,0.00043634677,0.0011647454,0.006471453,0.0049643414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98235404,0.007131747,0.00068361225,0.00040883347,0.0077857287,0.0016359048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013961873,0.00038868494,0.00082430535,0.004289699,0.031283893,0.021801308,0.0033898992,0.007504431,0.003471022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028258083,0.0004914637,0.00049641414,0.0066343057,0.028658772,0.0056218063,0.0045110965,0.008468543,0.00021525664],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014322421,0.000009396877,0.0011090093,0.000095823845,0.000020817864,0.0002450401,0.01303441,0.00041073305,0.000104581864,0.94515383,0.030362757,0.009439264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043404336,0.000021946295,0.0113947075,0.0015618984,0.00015685573,0.00012415009,0.049171016,0.0012384731,0.0005569569,0.25341782,0.6820574,0.00025544871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99060625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9934164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1853318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1853318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2706414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9448996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111151991","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2007.36.2.106","title":"Going Virtual: Using Some Common Law World Initiatives to Update the Nigerian Law on Corporate Democracy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law reform; Corporate governance; The Internet; Democracy; Shareholder; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Corporate law; Business; Law; Economics; Public administration; Political science; Finance; Politics","score_opus":0.05799144634457442,"score_gpt":0.2949627132824753,"score_spread":0.23697126693790088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111151991","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21406657,0.01719545,0.018160215,0.21216199,0.0055511356,0.00025918687,0.000046894445,0.00007546034,0.5324831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9301375,0.0075008976,0.00711476,0.02102372,0.0004880741,0.00009059854,0.000028697814,0.000038422724,0.03357719],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99636555,0.0025286237,0.000116181815,0.00019246258,0.00041578835,0.00038133113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968375,0.001975119,0.00029347194,0.00030971994,0.00038893588,0.00019519788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004741173,0.00024401308,0.00018409044,0.0015737623,0.009240788,0.009159733,0.0004919563,0.0046866955,0.001726274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007949245,0.0001793432,0.00023444029,0.0013382947,0.011963166,0.009498509,0.002868327,0.004832092,0.0001574759],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001530558,0.00004028171,0.0011315396,0.000072416486,0.000002419954,0.00046526614,0.01983108,0.00015336915,0.00030005752,0.946881,0.007263938,0.023843328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024504658,0.00013219427,0.0038750428,0.0007614997,0.000021460553,0.00050296716,0.053827945,0.0008267716,0.001584317,0.14156038,0.796835,0.000047835376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011145002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024484014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011145002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044660093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042127403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03240335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112852255","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2005.34.4.316","title":"The Enduring Legacy of ‘Reckless Disregard’","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Appeal; Demise; Duty; Law; Duty of care; Proposition; Order (exchange); Common law; Political science; Standard of review; Law and economics; Sociology; Judicial review; Business","score_opus":0.04968559655905262,"score_gpt":0.38046439981864427,"score_spread":0.33077880325959164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112852255","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19435464,0.062481932,0.018896703,0.27147952,0.0025384813,0.000082481405,0.00021614696,0.00015548473,0.44979465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9041532,0.010474195,0.0022583725,0.06402705,0.0009030647,0.000031864893,0.000066736764,0.000052307507,0.018033145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9717723,0.008073391,0.0013445128,0.0034639593,0.01366214,0.0016837516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95150834,0.029308641,0.005409058,0.0041899714,0.008366656,0.0012173922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02020824,0.00022254807,0.00060711725,0.0028869773,0.006644461,0.0073511587,0.0024547474,0.007012108,0.0024780887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06021208,0.0005210809,0.00050186075,0.0020855484,0.037173104,0.008298447,0.005775543,0.010782294,0.00065731467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017747692,0.00002322663,0.00488388,0.00036881282,0.000078528225,0.00079222105,0.03523082,0.00014596773,0.000268686,0.84408146,0.039256614,0.074852064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013328327,0.00009227778,0.02039457,0.001957007,0.00012659346,0.002769773,0.02113325,0.0002768203,0.0015498289,0.22976047,0.7217607,0.00016540244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05492547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.106887236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05492547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052891355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00794119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.109211564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166345381","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2007.36.1.50","title":"Protecting Prepaying Buyers of Unascertained Goods: Why ‘Pay before You Go’ May Be Bad for You","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Appeal; Legislature; Statutory law; Jurisdiction; Political science; Commission; Intervention (counseling); Judicial review; Doctrine; Injustice; Law and economics; Common law; Position (finance); Economics","score_opus":0.056863311170841646,"score_gpt":0.38294445570573404,"score_spread":0.3260811445348924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166345381","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14442432,0.022494754,0.012876228,0.56214076,0.0016300546,0.00007326649,0.00008125051,0.000050596056,0.25622874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9032429,0.006398424,0.0020946036,0.06469484,0.00066188513,0.000032920652,0.000020345213,0.000031133888,0.022823041],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99574536,0.0015885186,0.0001863047,0.0005127786,0.0011964422,0.0007706371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988086,0.007814409,0.0013194042,0.000639697,0.0018124126,0.00032810008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073460382,0.00018488607,0.00049339025,0.0005975811,0.004631887,0.009033806,0.0014969961,0.011180182,0.0049476265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018566785,0.0003568002,0.0005198868,0.0005722801,0.018963248,0.008815191,0.0024259721,0.0069181263,0.0008911225],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007322926,0.000058091326,0.007202269,0.00021587682,0.00002813499,0.0014413525,0.01757285,0.00020069824,0.0005981762,0.9159799,0.034474086,0.022155294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006190057,0.00020411059,0.01042607,0.0011020921,0.00013761746,0.0021063243,0.034058206,0.001047837,0.0038753853,0.49982554,0.44697908,0.00017579868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01608055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019918043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01608055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031684465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004648511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03885001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2185371555","doi":"10.1177/1473779515592833","title":"Injured passengers and the defence of illegality","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Appeal; Tort; Scope (computer science); Context (archaeology); Order (exchange); Law; Law and economics; Common law; Political science; Business; Proposition; High Court; Liability; Economics; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.07494922749480872,"score_gpt":0.38303665179963603,"score_spread":0.30808742430482733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2185371555","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0222289,0.84596616,0.0013251124,0.053562623,0.0009605103,0.00004672982,0.00006363011,0.000006726203,0.075839676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4894838,0.49007902,0.0008093505,0.013355504,0.00117878,0.000047261543,0.000057245943,0.00000659907,0.0049824016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98904,0.0068040024,0.0006445931,0.00047097504,0.002396734,0.0006436882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9679785,0.024317317,0.0039188936,0.00048642242,0.0028301885,0.0004685768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0117054805,0.0002767536,0.0007925602,0.0054356335,0.0021126512,0.0034959686,0.0009625384,0.0058212313,0.0023247323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028067281,0.00027650013,0.00058507745,0.003046182,0.011821417,0.0035955787,0.0022605227,0.002975983,0.00029623433],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034432946,0.000054027867,0.0033816842,0.004123164,0.0000940001,0.0006301847,0.0054916465,0.0005853615,0.00016379499,0.84125787,0.013970742,0.13021304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045041834,0.000237891,0.019896962,0.02404579,0.0001793917,0.0010774162,0.010909828,0.00042094203,0.0003641251,0.42344767,0.5192954,0.000079601545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021437407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023212688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021437407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041005076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010522174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061905205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2423013223","doi":"10.1177/1473779516657745","title":"Evolution, revolution and culture shift","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Settlement (finance); Economic Justice; Adversarial system; Law; Political science; Process (computing); Sociology; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.01663805972798435,"score_gpt":0.25173558595008605,"score_spread":0.2350975262221017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2423013223","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44404447,0.01276666,0.0028754731,0.09338532,0.0008736129,0.00008295183,0.00022691,0.00008306115,0.4456616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9700041,0.0032477523,0.0008279454,0.0054641613,0.00015072436,0.000020393054,0.000058680955,0.000045074536,0.020181168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995048,0.0012343971,0.00017455939,0.0008322936,0.0012780896,0.0014326072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949537,0.0010283141,0.0004910212,0.00060519966,0.001755402,0.0011662961],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005742161,0.00021620694,0.0004770638,0.002365452,0.010811751,0.010498455,0.0011746136,0.0018700485,0.0046436973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062717535,0.000235719,0.00027757327,0.0025951897,0.03545729,0.0037282186,0.004187687,0.00380487,0.0005259672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049279275,0.000052667347,0.0044601248,0.00007124329,0.000011366902,0.00025651194,0.082431845,0.00018443364,0.0005390755,0.85532415,0.009405079,0.047214158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026150792,0.00006799177,0.022485174,0.00027686555,0.000014821021,0.00027321416,0.06672492,0.00034481555,0.00060280046,0.06066166,0.84845024,0.00007134507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4073566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41207317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4073566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035007246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022959713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80997103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531130657","doi":"10.1177/1473779516661939","title":"Can class members appeal class action settlements? A study from British Columbia","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Plaintiff; Appeal; Settlement (finance); Law; Negotiation; Political science; Human settlement; Class (philosophy); Supreme court; Action (physics); Business; History","score_opus":0.03313534164684181,"score_gpt":0.2782867312496811,"score_spread":0.2451513896028393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531130657","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9374328,0.0024135849,0.00008116379,0.004219634,0.0000343405,0.00013112914,0.0003528172,0.000006069279,0.05532851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9782562,0.0028411252,0.000107599335,0.0022689814,0.000012784619,0.00006842405,0.00023475761,0.000011679993,0.016198335],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.995849,0.0007178417,0.00011977489,0.0003362673,0.0011555448,0.0018215115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909705,0.0029395788,0.0007116098,0.0003044699,0.0032150657,0.0018587491],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028169146,0.00035303566,0.0006752875,0.002706345,0.019795375,0.0056239897,0.002540682,0.0019197335,0.005936278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009293797,0.00044840088,0.0002847562,0.006382403,0.0037524784,0.0016499001,0.0024006423,0.003116509,0.000736029],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006329821,0.002413717,0.41555303,0.00074630906,0.00013543153,0.0063771405,0.35921443,0.00051649834,0.0021149467,0.033468273,0.0546369,0.12419029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008159908,0.00020953629,0.49211887,0.00093179336,0.00010617375,0.0004301895,0.41752532,0.0004145022,0.0004446527,0.0011932297,0.08643232,0.000111798196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9933575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08154615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08154615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.095054634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5916615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765178681","doi":"10.1177/1473779517725010","title":"Punitive damages for breach of contract","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Damages; Law; Appeal; Jurisprudence; Punishment (psychology); Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.10015441868510054,"score_gpt":0.4525898886485318,"score_spread":0.3524354699634312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765178681","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04324585,0.014816489,0.01776065,0.034087587,0.0017055626,0.00030633662,0.00032281995,0.00014344885,0.88761115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88281065,0.007931844,0.0045434786,0.026459746,0.0009942469,0.00037916086,0.00019670447,0.000039625935,0.07664459],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97490275,0.0063221874,0.0016728971,0.001899883,0.012559532,0.0026427296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906695,0.0037877313,0.0013114571,0.0012859403,0.0022273432,0.0007180533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011006322,0.0005654459,0.0007467424,0.0018775781,0.004231067,0.0050456966,0.0015981634,0.0071992083,0.0084925955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029396214,0.00038428273,0.0009799289,0.0013937544,0.007054701,0.002940206,0.0050764736,0.0063568023,0.0014073048],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030305773,0.00009162598,0.001796661,0.00020376967,0.00006145608,0.00046651613,0.00086612883,0.0006789955,0.000463742,0.9319902,0.025200982,0.038149536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000087602464,0.00045771888,0.016727269,0.0014512426,0.00012116378,0.0023562193,0.001444788,0.0014585338,0.0012797079,0.35788465,0.616572,0.00015908567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0080651725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0136443805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011006322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004356124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009118267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05820769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767838882","doi":"10.1177/1473779517735286","title":"Predictability, certainty, and party autonomy in the sale and supply of goods","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal certainty; Legislation; Certainty; Predictability; Law; Common law; Autonomy; Law and economics; Supreme court; Business; Order (exchange); Interpretation (philosophy); Jurisdiction; Economics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.05284738261592386,"score_gpt":0.301247279643101,"score_spread":0.24839989702717713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767838882","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15059118,0.04076359,0.15199265,0.058096293,0.0007924494,0.00032331518,0.00022503537,0.00007080819,0.59714466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9803823,0.006130361,0.006649429,0.0016597001,0.0006103652,0.00014810743,0.00004138163,0.0000147995515,0.0043634977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9770124,0.009820099,0.001763743,0.0016666551,0.00836416,0.0013730034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94504577,0.03931539,0.008349301,0.003606499,0.0025788674,0.0011041482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019315874,0.0002865627,0.0006674035,0.0028243314,0.0035345557,0.010450208,0.001371364,0.0045837504,0.002129534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049892273,0.00052813825,0.00087894686,0.0028740608,0.03371723,0.015325885,0.006432087,0.00564998,0.00036509664],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075814264,0.000006117299,0.0006595208,0.000043294564,0.000006274479,0.000046381134,0.0006438855,0.0005162302,0.000052238203,0.9920704,0.00022894765,0.0057191653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011387456,0.000030529824,0.0026448667,0.00023784852,0.000011046872,0.000076604694,0.0005664233,0.0005908233,0.0001305514,0.9799116,0.015761118,0.00002721775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004816134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048992713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019315874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00393978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076670866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1021533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768174928","doi":"10.1177/1473779517739798","title":"The need for an intrusion upon seclusion privacy tort within English law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Seclusion; Punitive damages; Law; Confidentiality; Political science; Intrusion; Right to privacy; Common law; Privacy laws of the United States; English law; Information privacy; Computer security","score_opus":0.060983673195841366,"score_gpt":0.36726336350890965,"score_spread":0.3062796903130683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2768174928","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06432498,0.15352431,0.0064577293,0.33876672,0.001840549,0.00012111181,0.00019982363,0.00006082913,0.4347039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72874075,0.106595285,0.0047870707,0.10628379,0.001872841,0.00008977376,0.0001529209,0.000036726924,0.05144086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875519,0.0044371327,0.0007582166,0.000972936,0.004385349,0.0018942611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98301655,0.009696547,0.001953085,0.0008762891,0.0035297922,0.00092763745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011634819,0.00017716223,0.00055618986,0.001294664,0.0037530097,0.00840085,0.00122517,0.005861083,0.0026627355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020258306,0.00032680508,0.00069276383,0.0011306023,0.009861964,0.008628509,0.0025500364,0.0053495597,0.00051263475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002386101,0.000029117811,0.0022961393,0.00033567526,0.000014080937,0.0007653866,0.007936455,0.00012538477,0.0003838824,0.9276862,0.02332639,0.03707743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003051809,0.00012218789,0.013180333,0.0026826367,0.00008599362,0.0015270116,0.008789982,0.00030600434,0.00066604675,0.09408216,0.8784389,0.00008833608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09857661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1341782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09857661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007357954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020204388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19600564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789083327","doi":"10.1177/1473779518773642","title":"Official status of languages in the United Kingdom and Ireland","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Historical Studies of British Isles","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Welsh; Parliament; Legislation; Charter; Kingdom; Political science; Irish; Context (archaeology); Law; CLARITY; Official language; Devolution (biology); Sociology; Geography; Linguistics; Politics","score_opus":0.066749630773388,"score_gpt":0.30518995885391526,"score_spread":0.23844032808052726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789083327","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09980648,0.19519253,0.00030486693,0.032901883,0.0018007556,0.000046365232,0.0005813626,0.00004112804,0.66932464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87716484,0.06417129,0.0003266611,0.0059478125,0.00028764416,0.00006195472,0.00043380563,0.00005184035,0.051554065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98753625,0.0038228172,0.0013852254,0.00088217796,0.0032882195,0.0030852146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864906,0.0033618682,0.002034694,0.0006253864,0.0058415667,0.0016458089],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070633707,0.00020313817,0.00039442725,0.0049909027,0.004071112,0.011972198,0.0010357753,0.0015968279,0.004331782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016707264,0.0002795359,0.00018294151,0.007245155,0.007461519,0.004099063,0.0039231535,0.0019518436,0.0008455269],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010062702,0.00005151164,0.010452219,0.0012955677,0.000025322359,0.0008296174,0.10232153,0.00010523277,0.00028527452,0.68752426,0.06914934,0.12785946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008927844,0.000025442134,0.023790875,0.0015080918,0.00000880166,0.00018512255,0.041345704,0.000017569266,0.00007645196,0.0042269314,0.9287693,0.00003677873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3257247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31905344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3257247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016927462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0243256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6476575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897354250","doi":"10.1177/1473779518802571","title":"In search of a privacy action against breaches of physical privacy in Hong Kong","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Punitive damages; Tort; Damages; Statutory law; Internet privacy; Privacy laws of the United States; Personally identifiable information; Law; Cause of action; Privacy policy; Action (physics); Seclusion; Privacy law; Information privacy; Political science; Business; Computer security; Plaintiff; Computer science","score_opus":0.09189568260883578,"score_gpt":0.39812521062956135,"score_spread":0.30622952802072556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897354250","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33115223,0.3725772,0.0014239575,0.109088115,0.0014617885,0.0003051229,0.00022310307,0.0000248223,0.1837436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8183917,0.14781886,0.0007130045,0.014193147,0.00018954369,0.000080569895,0.00007692682,0.0000060969755,0.01853013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966461,0.0015874633,0.00030233405,0.00017112413,0.00050698733,0.00078594085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99367356,0.002845281,0.0010760942,0.0002849683,0.0014815317,0.0006385864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008177024,0.00017857601,0.0003377139,0.0011980382,0.0023624606,0.0039709327,0.0007411491,0.0018904958,0.0015456672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00972837,0.00021841818,0.0003833627,0.0018200246,0.0035827511,0.0025869382,0.0018666995,0.0020085454,0.00015102667],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026142134,0.00030447406,0.048046935,0.006385016,0.00028940858,0.0029129302,0.053366397,0.0019978944,0.00068156136,0.6282376,0.06723878,0.19027753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013814356,0.0006234625,0.1327864,0.009178318,0.000570042,0.0007431563,0.06657673,0.0007761736,0.0015274229,0.022556009,0.76438487,0.00013928747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36866495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36255914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36866495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011955897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04304289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7330382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970985859","doi":"10.1177/1473779519891597","title":"Twisted into knots: Canada’s challenges in lawful access to encrypted communications","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"United States National Security Agency; Encryption; Agency (philosophy); Law enforcement; Government (linguistics); Law; National security; Political science; Internet privacy; Business; Computer security; Public relations; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.3087194379670787,"score_gpt":0.41953554654088954,"score_spread":0.11081610857381086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970985859","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036494616,0.04326368,0.00439941,0.76909864,0.0014916154,0.00012501894,0.000537334,0.000092022616,0.14449771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7160867,0.049558062,0.00660386,0.1823926,0.0009889507,0.00009964477,0.00036611132,0.00014906331,0.043755006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97264546,0.004011676,0.0007797129,0.0018924858,0.014898392,0.0057722423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94529027,0.022224782,0.0022589562,0.0018301288,0.023118395,0.0052774576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016728083,0.00035322199,0.00064830284,0.0031838496,0.022443097,0.020870633,0.0039688735,0.0075777248,0.0049027693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047626916,0.00061608956,0.0007706852,0.00521696,0.017941274,0.0067056925,0.005542385,0.013108693,0.00042186092],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060330687,0.000037275076,0.0052766916,0.00050792925,0.00005810794,0.0009922523,0.012312377,0.0010166793,0.00041587977,0.7365694,0.15141705,0.09133593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057498226,0.000042836527,0.010721625,0.0019610457,0.000113373455,0.0005589294,0.019210413,0.0012774089,0.00089911744,0.085276425,0.8796564,0.00022494234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98953503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99213696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14930515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14930515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3721512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98668545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995287528","doi":"10.1177/1473779519891623","title":"Constitutional promises of indigenous recognition: Canada, Vanuatu and the challenges of pluralism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Indigenous; Commit; Colonialism; Indigenous rights; Political science; Law; Legal pluralism; Sociology; Law and economics; Human rights; Political economy; Epistemology; Comparative law; Legal realism","score_opus":0.04928625957437298,"score_gpt":0.3044637041453054,"score_spread":0.2551774445709324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995287528","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19127285,0.33219662,0.0012067135,0.16153102,0.0014466414,0.000060938986,0.00031839966,0.00003422562,0.31193256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91353637,0.059374314,0.000787335,0.009696413,0.00024701233,0.000031904267,0.00009607884,0.000014878491,0.01621572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99542916,0.00083208294,0.0001237189,0.0003415158,0.0014557791,0.0018176945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99477106,0.0020959831,0.00035270178,0.0002206802,0.0017465559,0.00081304036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004943232,0.00022334034,0.00043485453,0.0024072898,0.0115096355,0.011134943,0.0020602725,0.0026937758,0.0015696648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008096935,0.00018111979,0.00024976942,0.004361005,0.013540109,0.0029705241,0.0035199448,0.0028246683,0.00007124855],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004985974,0.00002419942,0.003196547,0.0005649677,0.00003705816,0.0004943834,0.019374754,0.00066843606,0.0003231948,0.8888207,0.021431018,0.06501492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003471876,0.000039932016,0.025913533,0.0034578126,0.00016560897,0.0003820114,0.06095477,0.00091504684,0.0008838566,0.1324312,0.77467185,0.00014964149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9743785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9856038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06960368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06960368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17409982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5050124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3029084391","doi":"10.1177/1473779520927715","title":"Through which glass darkly? Constitutional principle in legality and constitutionality review","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Principle of legality; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Statute; Constitution; Legitimacy; Adjudication; Common law; Interpretation (philosophy); Judicial review; Constitutional law; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10086855393848133,"score_gpt":0.38679863242556745,"score_spread":0.2859300784870861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3029084391","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015850948,0.16696914,0.027057694,0.48709932,0.007290946,0.00016281064,0.0001896087,0.00012961049,0.29525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77396244,0.0699026,0.009281349,0.08486657,0.0075623794,0.0003000995,0.00014044791,0.00014158794,0.053842563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98349285,0.010323318,0.00055427186,0.0015744753,0.002784578,0.0012704779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9813256,0.013945199,0.00075567845,0.0013194886,0.0021172767,0.0005366671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016887477,0.00024029368,0.00076760945,0.0028385809,0.00506356,0.011460696,0.0011657852,0.0052988958,0.003916821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04206261,0.00033207895,0.00042679577,0.0023205557,0.039138652,0.013926207,0.0028732847,0.0071853604,0.0006508004],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003024044,0.000003122282,0.00008045348,0.00004737507,0.0000031759787,0.000030483827,0.0008160731,0.00004625093,0.00004183188,0.9845418,0.00775482,0.006631601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010263943,0.00001939674,0.0004047261,0.0005593295,0.000013150076,0.000070430826,0.0018434741,0.00012555892,0.00017845604,0.69172734,0.3050276,0.000020280691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016459202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017909752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016887477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068206177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013366419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08931053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3116037271","doi":"10.1177/1473779520975121","title":"Counterterrorism and the challenges of terrorism from the far right","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Proscription; Political science; Sanctions; Law; Far right; Law and economics; Politics; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.04645612116037193,"score_gpt":0.3168945545549526,"score_spread":0.2704384333945806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3116037271","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008664165,0.6342074,0.0024237838,0.09832344,0.0036672878,0.00006402528,0.000037750964,0.000019569165,0.25259253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32295877,0.58312875,0.0013021303,0.05021068,0.004122484,0.00012100903,0.000055846984,0.000042182262,0.038058214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99287355,0.0034801485,0.00036948553,0.00057901506,0.0019677565,0.000730039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99378926,0.0041082017,0.00067334675,0.00035475605,0.0008483261,0.00022607502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056515983,0.0004479258,0.0006637637,0.0019826235,0.0031265884,0.00728588,0.0012130407,0.0064906646,0.0043269843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074008317,0.00023351738,0.0005840971,0.0012271608,0.015228236,0.0055798595,0.0030321563,0.0062954477,0.00081460294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002032183,0.000045013774,0.0004395632,0.0018520169,0.00003144314,0.0003265284,0.0027727634,0.00046868072,0.0002529579,0.857774,0.025091648,0.110925056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015538268,0.000101764985,0.0024208908,0.007046168,0.000032296233,0.00050599605,0.0045674914,0.00016008352,0.00038462097,0.15802932,0.826704,0.00003179334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01201748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010829435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01201748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004360189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00888032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031635523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125934066","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2010.39.1.0192","title":"‘Free to Deal as He May Choose’: The Displacement of ‘Freedom of Commerce’ as a Necessary Condition to the Creation of Canadian Multiculturalism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Multiculturalism; Corporation; Charter; Sociology; Jurisdiction; Political science; Law and economics","score_opus":0.020712227215702657,"score_gpt":0.3075396587205928,"score_spread":0.28682743150489015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125934066","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14098112,0.10183743,0.0016314946,0.16364028,0.0013454023,0.000047979596,0.00017228491,0.000027683345,0.5903163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9488079,0.02378016,0.00059852225,0.007548909,0.00018313863,0.000009466922,0.000038144237,0.000015474361,0.019018287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997015,0.0005745111,0.000045448156,0.000205922,0.0010998686,0.0010592544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980698,0.0006741746,0.00014087796,0.0000924794,0.00062295946,0.00039972845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002387206,0.0002081814,0.00025097613,0.0015460529,0.015696945,0.008120367,0.0010328458,0.0021074994,0.0027457792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004334633,0.00018091575,0.0001997413,0.0025842525,0.030042758,0.0029547939,0.002118626,0.0024759832,0.00018425271],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018188095,0.000012100353,0.001259804,0.00013599415,0.000006658854,0.00035130145,0.038815763,0.00017310811,0.00017721918,0.90352315,0.024260603,0.03126611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016062957,0.000022308757,0.01861991,0.00041838278,0.000025119061,0.0002987597,0.045430858,0.00021742664,0.00038836748,0.062543444,0.8719353,0.00008400991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.979989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9883483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.066592485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.066592485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11854567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48316455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3132071353","doi":"10.1177/1473779521991557","title":"Violent crime, hate speech or terrorism? How Canada views and prosecutes far-right extremism (2001–2019)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Far right; Ideology; Law; Political science; Criminology; Rhetoric; Criminal law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.047918684412296,"score_gpt":0.3338737586865225,"score_spread":0.2859550742742265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3132071353","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10421465,0.6515754,0.00022939364,0.12226937,0.0012184405,0.0001584915,0.0022548053,0.000031908,0.11804769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58990955,0.371703,0.0003081054,0.020884858,0.0003765997,0.00004340135,0.0008658617,0.000030489377,0.015878145],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956618,0.0006681321,0.00013686561,0.0002478295,0.0021330921,0.001152262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98687774,0.002000769,0.0011987566,0.00017380685,0.007981715,0.0017671109],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004865069,0.00021790064,0.00039707002,0.0042433054,0.005905988,0.0065603238,0.0016790569,0.0018425953,0.0018671872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015504922,0.00030456917,0.00029285223,0.00810681,0.0045951,0.0013524733,0.00089622557,0.0021371108,0.00028518357],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002593751,0.00010455321,0.0722655,0.00512838,0.0002712341,0.0008321598,0.031047301,0.00087076967,0.0005493509,0.06808273,0.42036277,0.40022588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056739773,0.0000752901,0.28500608,0.00523386,0.00041479553,0.0002543958,0.025786474,0.00023857363,0.0005152112,0.0026549362,0.67964613,0.000117534924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9945568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99791914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.094652876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.094652876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17218868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6867579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157691714","doi":"10.1177/14737795211010822","title":"Warrantless searches of a mobile phone’s digital contents and privacy interests in Hong Kong","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Warrant; Appeal; Law; Officer; Mobile phone; Political science; Power (physics); Phone; Business; Computer science; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.09604262763015724,"score_gpt":0.3717743452874775,"score_spread":0.27573171765732024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157691714","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9090792,0.0049502477,0.0004433293,0.0076169954,0.000074967305,0.0000654647,0.00011428271,0.0000073226047,0.077648275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98694056,0.0029896703,0.000108706095,0.0017290002,0.000017932462,0.000017644077,0.000026852456,0.000002156381,0.008167609],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771726,0.0005969746,0.00025886018,0.00014201897,0.0003699162,0.0009150805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955894,0.00233612,0.0007075155,0.00034468764,0.00067384436,0.00034842957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030134579,0.0001986981,0.00025981263,0.00094407966,0.004595573,0.0062111793,0.0007096914,0.0018867546,0.0020581598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055510434,0.00055510097,0.00032658302,0.0019516606,0.006044728,0.002981444,0.0026115866,0.0024578178,0.00023706163],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044351607,0.00027503815,0.22377346,0.0011981942,0.00014176923,0.041380577,0.21033508,0.0022745528,0.0021848537,0.44191998,0.0259393,0.050133668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013803161,0.000516078,0.28215635,0.002562679,0.0006065126,0.010136781,0.35687837,0.0045361733,0.0071314615,0.024284266,0.3105678,0.0004854251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5501798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5671834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5501798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012768621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016590385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9049386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254839842","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2010.39.3.0211","title":"Getting to Grips With the Shareholder Value Theory in Corporate Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shareholder value; Shareholder; Shareholder primacy; Corporate law; Value (mathematics); Stakeholder; Stakeholder theory; Corporate governance; Law and economics; Shareholder resolution; Business; Shareholder loan; Accounting; Law; Economics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.04901545279999093,"score_gpt":0.2369588806333884,"score_spread":0.1879434278333975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254839842","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021732425,0.079856634,0.10949601,0.5761514,0.0041231476,0.00006852871,0.00008933968,0.00011233859,0.20837025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.772853,0.06538343,0.045729056,0.06663253,0.01725098,0.00028887347,0.00014076261,0.00027092907,0.031450395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98597175,0.008163187,0.00038700693,0.0010472791,0.0036053904,0.00082532776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96904254,0.0260952,0.000983451,0.001221593,0.0018435821,0.00081370433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018697063,0.0008813168,0.0015179927,0.0036239745,0.0056149806,0.014571907,0.0024675168,0.010657401,0.0050818496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0233022,0.00067276176,0.0011617966,0.0033892002,0.0817236,0.04229656,0.006044685,0.023856254,0.0015408017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029934238,0.000010160518,0.000081350496,0.000027780028,0.0000023611963,0.00002726122,0.0008285541,0.00012543594,0.000026282898,0.9935196,0.0017878967,0.0035602227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041998064,0.000007969413,0.00008130686,0.00011072431,0.0000013879002,0.000016446496,0.00040560352,0.00026561657,0.000038319675,0.98635536,0.012705858,0.000007203014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058652605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042054136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018697063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009537829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060473443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09888071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280574016","doi":"10.1177/14737795211055781","title":"Friendly judicial challenges from the North: The decision of the Canada Supreme Court in <i>Nevsun Resources Ltd v Araya</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Doctrine; Political science; Common law; State (computer science); International law; Customary international law; Judicial opinion; Choice of law; Jurisdiction; Public international law","score_opus":0.02675376037311372,"score_gpt":0.2758997364705553,"score_spread":0.2491459760974416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280574016","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04283071,0.020120991,0.0017075811,0.5454696,0.0026674978,0.00009307357,0.0002667144,0.0000570622,0.3867868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.583384,0.0074487003,0.0016260195,0.32000756,0.0009513019,0.00007137973,0.0001178325,0.00008650384,0.08630667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99054635,0.0015093363,0.00019340425,0.0009896931,0.003822268,0.0029388866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99392384,0.0023161883,0.00022129445,0.0001668498,0.0022350543,0.0011367317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005944255,0.00038328025,0.00053643796,0.001181955,0.03245181,0.0147842895,0.0031226063,0.013565812,0.0036139884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011819452,0.0005184114,0.0005788181,0.0017763638,0.017147295,0.003279172,0.0032972863,0.017534299,0.0005191052],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027746853,0.000020380534,0.0012222824,0.00007329715,0.000023053371,0.0010597208,0.013025748,0.00027620222,0.0004744746,0.74699926,0.22314307,0.013654837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007331443,0.000021048132,0.0066834074,0.00069236953,0.000071771865,0.00040202262,0.03521581,0.0008620426,0.001106786,0.10316018,0.85150295,0.00020816259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9643837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98563033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.068364635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.068364635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14839989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49602246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280587145","doi":"10.1177/14737795211070838","title":"Strike-out Appeals, Unjust Enrichment, and Discoverability: Insights from Kenya","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Unjust enrichment; Appeal; Political science; Common law; Mistake; Subject (documents); High Court; Tribunal; Interlocutory; Restitution","score_opus":0.03943548343380984,"score_gpt":0.33616096039292775,"score_spread":0.2967254769591179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280587145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5110684,0.01260571,0.0013271997,0.027223315,0.000092400005,0.00018315233,0.0001883156,0.0000073920314,0.44730407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9701961,0.008201884,0.00042596488,0.0032578206,0.000042205633,0.000066141045,0.00006393844,0.000011698595,0.017734207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998268,0.0006637615,0.000100179845,0.0001330169,0.00035302405,0.00048185847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928758,0.0058114235,0.0005179979,0.00013297882,0.00046764818,0.0001941714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034214114,0.00022637931,0.0005865166,0.0028870022,0.01160237,0.0064770845,0.0011082602,0.0035414298,0.00986351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010574325,0.00040633095,0.0002805981,0.0038394842,0.00944515,0.010327826,0.003488818,0.0036080007,0.00052376074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007237982,0.00016797191,0.010075106,0.00038725114,0.00001856019,0.0036398054,0.1724509,0.00029401307,0.00047345116,0.782144,0.009224287,0.021052206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011327472,0.00011837953,0.04923,0.003000142,0.00014830782,0.0013094819,0.48650703,0.0012232363,0.0009055019,0.17694604,0.2803663,0.00013230053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.097836256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27492902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.097836256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009204163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00779796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19453359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294946013","doi":"10.1177/14737795211071100","title":"Religious-based discrimination in the commercial context on the basis of sexual orientation: A comparative perspective","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisdiction; Statutory law; Sexual orientation; Context (archaeology); Political science; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Position (finance); Economics; Gender studies","score_opus":0.09479652478794733,"score_gpt":0.3980609167522519,"score_spread":0.3032643919643046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294946013","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33939674,0.031056913,0.00109375,0.025987905,0.00039343056,0.000020350548,0.00007469216,0.0000055324354,0.6019707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901894,0.004457839,0.00012828439,0.001563603,0.000091728914,0.0000061343526,0.000015423466,0.0000049062137,0.0035426929],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977431,0.0013821411,0.000031775788,0.000077413824,0.0003015582,0.0004640836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99702495,0.002003742,0.00018569762,0.0001114791,0.00041052527,0.0002636156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027795832,0.00016846502,0.0003600305,0.0035105057,0.0061199814,0.0068258587,0.000781566,0.0026036396,0.0057039433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003932991,0.00013359735,0.00024161972,0.0031105487,0.01822958,0.004137252,0.0029500704,0.002011101,0.00023860995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003993742,0.00005755372,0.0049247583,0.00014391333,0.000016603773,0.0009101494,0.09735388,0.0000913895,0.00043893032,0.8726056,0.0031950956,0.020222245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034739853,0.00014602888,0.05474784,0.0015135381,0.00006136491,0.0017669405,0.5428704,0.00036229807,0.0006710273,0.09682976,0.30094123,0.00005482228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.066624865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16324662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.066624865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008638381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027019302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13247418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388570607","doi":"10.1177/14737795231213379","title":"On the meaning of <i>bankruptcy</i> : ‘Old–new’ lexicon in corporate insolvency law in the Commonwealth Caribbean","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Bankruptcy; Statute; Law; Legislation; Political science; Statutory interpretation; Business","score_opus":0.08034363034968427,"score_gpt":0.2724706067729859,"score_spread":0.19212697642330162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388570607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07587102,0.007993575,0.009660154,0.028177915,0.0006754302,0.00009455866,0.00033862906,0.00013146436,0.87705725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9725749,0.0041370904,0.0026295164,0.0035790834,0.00038140005,0.000090409245,0.00021088649,0.00025944647,0.01613727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803084,0.00097048323,0.00009740089,0.0001485121,0.00047527047,0.00027746693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964101,0.0019305605,0.00030849283,0.00017570521,0.0009623028,0.00021288777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016776603,0.00053826027,0.00060456764,0.004649473,0.009558564,0.015717851,0.0014693141,0.002227333,0.0036675676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005067686,0.00039026368,0.00026544204,0.0049747676,0.023651937,0.0060986253,0.00392049,0.0043809093,0.0005234054],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001425894,0.0000092036835,0.00045767412,0.00009040352,0.000003308277,0.0004519928,0.10527359,0.0001286871,0.00056291954,0.8768564,0.00858417,0.007567365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016207689,0.000022869326,0.0051034964,0.000926551,0.000028933147,0.000718038,0.13339415,0.001441311,0.00077797094,0.13690254,0.7205704,0.00009764407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3681438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3874227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3681438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02344146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009629423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7320019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}