{"meta":{"query_hash":"26f2b6b775d0","filters":{"venue":"Common Market Law Review"},"cohort_total":15,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":15,"exported":15,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/26f2b6b775d0","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Common+Market+Law+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1497257453","doi":"10.54648/cola2012036","title":"Administrative enforcement, judicial review and fundamental rights in EU competition law: A comparative contextual-functionalist perspective","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Market Law Review","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Judicial review; Law; Judicial independence; Enforcement; Legislature; Law and economics; Impartiality; Administrative law; Duty; Common law; Constitutional law; Competition law; Economics; Supreme court; Monopoly","score_opus":0.09602848179997853,"score_gpt":0.40362158559792294,"score_spread":0.3075931037979444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1497257453","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19485071,0.02591484,0.08643894,0.05201491,0.00050614245,0.00022741618,0.00019660612,0.00012903167,0.63972133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872687,0.0023175434,0.0054651047,0.0016406034,0.0002436948,0.000096621014,0.00004091004,0.000023830047,0.0029029252],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9754301,0.016567757,0.00088986004,0.0017359698,0.0030637407,0.0023125731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9699166,0.020961458,0.0030867357,0.0030276347,0.0025221533,0.00048533484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022772538,0.0003532018,0.0009293208,0.0058643823,0.005440147,0.013801465,0.0023742511,0.0055088876,0.0036028584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029030884,0.00053490896,0.0009931689,0.004922915,0.042166308,0.009488133,0.0037990964,0.0024377261,0.00021460025],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031129548,0.000007332302,0.00018652534,0.000017319257,0.00000314536,0.000023701328,0.00071545475,0.00034363565,0.000027561808,0.99659,0.00016458747,0.0019175288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043922442,0.000060822116,0.0037201275,0.00037955123,0.000040374707,0.00010771847,0.0031947112,0.0019346188,0.00033063308,0.9511991,0.038947444,0.000041014315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020626102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017114056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022772538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012477972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012696937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.120434105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1504669761","doi":"10.54648/cola2008093","title":"The Court of Justice and the social market economy: The emergence of an ideal and the conditions for its realization","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Market Law Review","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":166,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideal (ethics); European Union law; Directive; Law and economics; Treaty; Law; Action (physics); Treaty of Rome; Economics; Political science; Economic Justice; Sociology; Economic system; European integration; European union; International trade","score_opus":0.04842729060615897,"score_gpt":0.35571818000369765,"score_spread":0.3072908893975387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1504669761","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03292196,0.013569157,0.022358377,0.29998887,0.0013482737,0.000120241166,0.00008638152,0.00004482936,0.629562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94254595,0.0036535768,0.005686583,0.021901198,0.0020831246,0.00029688588,0.00004207586,0.00005960587,0.023730913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97524345,0.0132695325,0.0007603845,0.0023458945,0.005219494,0.0031612488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98089874,0.013315688,0.0015155603,0.001153704,0.0019016122,0.0012146111],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022485686,0.00040423055,0.0011451326,0.0026384147,0.014690203,0.023802377,0.0021195444,0.020730937,0.004668268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030821873,0.00058436213,0.00085181434,0.003040865,0.07770995,0.015366215,0.0074575194,0.0150640365,0.0006041264],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.723685e-7,0.000001499764,0.0000139319645,0.0000024997414,3.1212053e-7,0.0000115755765,0.0001764505,0.000020226127,0.000004365821,0.9990004,0.00049547025,0.00027243132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000114688555,0.0000055627625,0.00008462618,0.00005798804,0.0000014364049,0.000022891545,0.00049558404,0.00025253053,0.000020805495,0.97938263,0.019655844,0.000008538126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013799725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011352923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023802377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01532198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020996694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11891711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1546133123","doi":"10.54648/cola2008073","title":"Industrial actions and EU economic freedoms: The autonomous collective bargaining model curtailed by the European Court of Justice","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Market Law Review","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Collective bargaining; Collective action; Directive; Law; Member state; Law and economics; European court of justice; Political science; Legislation; European Union law; European union; Economics; Member states; International trade","score_opus":0.07501387158550148,"score_gpt":0.3126066166264372,"score_spread":0.2375927450409357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1546133123","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08865844,0.006644443,0.017316867,0.0646352,0.0012733481,0.00011144191,0.00016768608,0.00009874496,0.8210938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92352253,0.0009652,0.004511637,0.031063693,0.00042544608,0.0001724926,0.00009193255,0.00006148824,0.039185688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97870696,0.008034585,0.0010309722,0.0038815676,0.004347303,0.0039985552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99474454,0.0026691044,0.00047769022,0.0010412316,0.00060756784,0.00045990216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018656375,0.0006941801,0.0012740005,0.0014773048,0.0069545587,0.021218574,0.0026050443,0.022416849,0.0031540182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02005296,0.00056787994,0.0016190521,0.0017773786,0.020116094,0.0075701736,0.011009463,0.013462613,0.000596708],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001169414,0.00000817626,0.00009617673,0.000010314405,0.0000050889616,0.00005950856,0.0005188348,0.00024317806,0.00003055503,0.9958656,0.0017365717,0.0014143132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009755588,0.000048302507,0.0013309857,0.0003388281,0.000046955454,0.00015295282,0.001080823,0.0015527284,0.00035602332,0.86460406,0.13030355,0.000087230466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026398158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017127698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026398158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00821231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0109856315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098665535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1569264908","doi":"10.54648/cola2012034","title":"New Categories of Acts after the Lisbon Reform: Dynamics of Parliamentarization in EU Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Market Law Review","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Treaty of Lisbon; Treaty; Legislature; Law; Political science; European union; Common law; European Union law; Commission; Politics; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.02456778212139421,"score_gpt":0.30697568035970674,"score_spread":0.2824078982383125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1569264908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18771063,0.011027254,0.006840885,0.036687925,0.0003701155,0.0000699141,0.00012427964,0.000082256796,0.75708675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9659976,0.0012944373,0.00092598284,0.0023921037,0.00012622602,0.00006921972,0.00005277593,0.00005468806,0.02908708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.972122,0.018263152,0.0007412117,0.0020258469,0.003791536,0.0030562636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98864913,0.006734318,0.0015062558,0.001080049,0.0012141343,0.0008161404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014628181,0.00041836474,0.000662922,0.0047434145,0.011247096,0.029564792,0.0018127193,0.005891607,0.005396609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018630017,0.00052346225,0.0007220773,0.0074786087,0.033583105,0.011596159,0.008864888,0.0068742293,0.0010152623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029744098,0.000008021657,0.0003370778,0.000029044855,0.0000033035324,0.00006285049,0.016160019,0.00016916601,0.000046858295,0.97700226,0.0014282513,0.004723356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000096045966,0.00010996927,0.015799413,0.0010398092,0.000028376217,0.0002237751,0.061692264,0.0013485395,0.0007578651,0.3687682,0.55004233,0.00009332703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02489812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027284393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038305756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038305756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013878121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27792907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1587344662","doi":"10.54648/cola2013136","title":"What if Cassis de Dijon were Cassis de Quebec? The assimilation of goods of third country origin in the internal market","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Market Law Review","topic":"European Political History Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Member state; Member states; Mutual recognition; State (computer science); Business; Economics; Commerce; International trade; Law and economics; European union; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.034145899939111095,"score_gpt":0.2772747855827129,"score_spread":0.2431288856436018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1587344662","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11150672,0.011655702,0.002842974,0.11137706,0.003093599,0.00009313124,0.001047143,0.0001349569,0.7582486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63685966,0.0035712013,0.0021446734,0.016157078,0.00017781,0.00003849131,0.00030646464,0.00007517075,0.34066936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874663,0.00013737137,0.000032105676,0.00028624292,0.0003751954,0.00042246113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907756,0.00011562475,0.000085641135,0.00006664004,0.0004520789,0.00020246208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010756488,0.00031541198,0.0004053471,0.000587089,0.0064566433,0.006198342,0.0006409675,0.0023837574,0.01426435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002240704,0.00019677202,0.0005326635,0.0008488342,0.0036661096,0.0019258381,0.0009674338,0.0033839522,0.001074074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023688335,0.00004561691,0.016794309,0.00016491748,0.00007169277,0.002106825,0.004951268,0.00075869897,0.001299999,0.85274607,0.07279882,0.048024945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033307086,0.000027032951,0.014300528,0.00028670538,0.00003625601,0.0005272625,0.003957997,0.00062578573,0.0009232889,0.015460139,0.9637193,0.00010238114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.965849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9711926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05350097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05350097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030919457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38817847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148846432","doi":"","title":"Case No. A 268/04, The Labour Court, Sweden (Arbetsdomstolen) Judgment No. 89/09 of 2 December 2009, Laval un Partneri Ltd. v. Svenska Bygggnadsarbetareförbundet et al.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Market Law Review","topic":"EU Law and Policy Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.05620328959035989,"score_gpt":0.34170859251448626,"score_spread":0.28550530292412635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148846432","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07043055,0.018965736,0.0019924229,0.16711044,0.010980033,0.0004338597,0.00538025,0.00039158785,0.7243151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17466837,0.0050117215,0.0017770298,0.14026637,0.001949337,0.000498511,0.0020501236,0.00019832842,0.6735801],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99677306,0.00042190484,0.0002344098,0.0005346304,0.0011500905,0.0008857918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978422,0.0012077246,0.000106264306,0.0000899548,0.00057068025,0.0001831939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033857988,0.00069019274,0.0005518087,0.001468835,0.01096664,0.00578821,0.0020053687,0.016301813,0.01734963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010179013,0.00077331346,0.00096907595,0.0010918904,0.0018537482,0.0013589608,0.0021748843,0.00839647,0.0055801077],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028025982,0.00008406945,0.0025589631,0.00025849516,0.00004861132,0.0016071713,0.0027168416,0.00025227247,0.0009609135,0.13012797,0.84903866,0.012065775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011024944,0.00009225155,0.0072164033,0.0010377449,0.00013270522,0.0005098077,0.0032668076,0.00035615542,0.0022157494,0.016747162,0.9682201,0.000094786614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1295113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24139723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1295113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005729877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009581022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2575149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2206403926","doi":"10.54648/cola2014090","title":"Before the law stands a gatekeeper Or, what is a regulatory act in Article 263(4) TFEU? <i>Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Market Law Review","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Common law; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.0156995851503625,"score_gpt":0.2560694885331365,"score_spread":0.240369903382774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2206403926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063463864,0.009596823,0.0022006014,0.276761,0.008581109,0.0003790524,0.0011870555,0.00044515342,0.69450283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08908026,0.0036760378,0.0024439932,0.30784974,0.001964897,0.00044185313,0.00042701446,0.00034937926,0.59376675],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909224,0.0010994948,0.00068864826,0.0015697757,0.0034070131,0.0023125662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933693,0.0028373534,0.00062363915,0.00052636216,0.002249726,0.0003937692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007381947,0.00062893174,0.0011471797,0.0013536692,0.0090753455,0.01678686,0.0042476472,0.041076377,0.033898197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021271596,0.0013695537,0.0015141965,0.0023531266,0.009284942,0.007694974,0.0034710206,0.02593119,0.017267026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003631371,0.00007294593,0.0004789213,0.0001637831,0.000020093848,0.0004259602,0.0023295493,0.00015312807,0.0007209007,0.4512082,0.53543967,0.008950509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032630913,0.000028358718,0.0015193608,0.00043545326,0.000045452925,0.000113287635,0.0019122221,0.00020494439,0.0007948308,0.030322831,0.9644831,0.000107532236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28349406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25649133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71650594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012540969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033332743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56368786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626036725","doi":"10.54648/cola2017090","title":"Genetically modified crops, agricultural sustainability and national opt-outs: Enclosure as the loophole?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Market Law Review","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast; Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Sustainability; Agricultural biodiversity; Context (archaeology); Business; Natural resource economics; Agriculture; Liability; Directive; Precautionary principle; Agricultural biotechnology; Economics; Biotechnology; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.031709889526320395,"score_gpt":0.30283080908494725,"score_spread":0.2711209195586268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2626036725","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06830129,0.030666081,0.03210732,0.26128688,0.00181084,0.000058897247,0.00013867285,0.00016128637,0.6054687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87663406,0.015763279,0.011024012,0.05828316,0.0009953881,0.0001534019,0.00011028586,0.00024291957,0.036793478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937318,0.0022367758,0.0003201888,0.0012765182,0.0015247779,0.0009099504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910492,0.005596432,0.001097356,0.0012163593,0.0006998379,0.00034080195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009284955,0.0005120858,0.00081696536,0.0007509391,0.005014213,0.01543586,0.002292762,0.013801107,0.0074073253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0125150075,0.00041661382,0.0009285768,0.0012248555,0.038873,0.02479764,0.008862325,0.011771019,0.00074766914],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071525724,0.0000116488545,0.00027066417,0.000032523323,0.0000035274,0.00008054829,0.0010226036,0.00011252796,0.00010691318,0.98881286,0.0023869998,0.0071520517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009460069,0.000028427597,0.0009360651,0.0006625385,0.000014340935,0.00030713927,0.0027888024,0.0003497773,0.00048284922,0.84399873,0.15038453,0.00003727561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067473473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070112613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01543586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056296326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054464815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049104154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998769526","doi":"10.54648/cola2019126","title":"Taking the enforcement of labour standards in the EUs free trade agreements seriously","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Market Law Review","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; International trade; Business; Free trade; International economics; Economics; Law and economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.023878453917204737,"score_gpt":0.3479850146021997,"score_spread":0.324106560684995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998769526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07542888,0.038423482,0.04076487,0.30015978,0.0043025487,0.00030463032,0.00022242384,0.00012399223,0.5402695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.814547,0.01107706,0.02347292,0.089372,0.0024723795,0.0003432598,0.00018455992,0.00008514847,0.05844572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9620601,0.015156988,0.0028605834,0.003413174,0.012963771,0.0035453013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96826214,0.018052196,0.0031526403,0.0037501957,0.0058957776,0.00088713726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031635992,0.0003447204,0.00073010736,0.0015305673,0.0042410796,0.013290392,0.0022845566,0.012012465,0.0017838301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045188975,0.000468343,0.0008576514,0.0019714537,0.012516823,0.011571514,0.00464741,0.010591964,0.00044317686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009821494,0.000028783545,0.0008059972,0.000133658,0.000012638306,0.00015418399,0.0016497221,0.00044776723,0.00032072858,0.96831304,0.006695724,0.021428017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003652216,0.0001399557,0.006250557,0.0021625452,0.000048530404,0.00030181833,0.0030852482,0.0012117951,0.0016222214,0.5857035,0.39933023,0.000106985266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012128394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016816674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031635992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052856947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021855626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1673091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125533736","doi":"10.54648/cola2007113","title":"The double-headed approach of the ECJ concerning consumer protection","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Market Law Review","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":125,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legislature; Legislation; Treaty; Consumer protection; Scope (computer science); Interpretation (philosophy); Common law; Economic Justice; Precedent; Political science; Business; Economics; Law and economics","score_opus":0.05269716247314966,"score_gpt":0.25396760972226523,"score_spread":0.20127044724911558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125533736","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024896007,0.009697948,0.036898803,0.12220178,0.0045013083,0.00019007751,0.00017119257,0.0001223512,0.80132055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60455245,0.0038672537,0.019405743,0.21040897,0.0042566694,0.0004989948,0.00009605716,0.00020005147,0.15671389],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9771742,0.0051197354,0.0011913519,0.005683538,0.008261353,0.0025697753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99138546,0.004865916,0.00044163055,0.0011608206,0.0017856469,0.00036052777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011354331,0.0006632265,0.0010449716,0.0019744309,0.0075436556,0.017302155,0.0025623792,0.026730955,0.0038336688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018034667,0.0006266891,0.0013699966,0.0019228726,0.02592816,0.0064955275,0.0063117235,0.017773746,0.0009811976],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000758219,0.000007223049,0.00013554013,0.000021342794,0.000005116202,0.00014086689,0.00079030957,0.00007467597,0.00014117526,0.99049604,0.0054791593,0.002700935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039864026,0.00007877669,0.0009923726,0.00042872073,0.00006116756,0.00076506165,0.0010755033,0.0010165288,0.0017737651,0.56230277,0.4313609,0.000104512255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018441826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019379213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026730955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075602173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011333736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060048163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213270061","doi":"10.54648/cola2021108","title":"The Polysemy Of Anti-Discrimination Law: The Interpretation Architecture Of The Framework Employment Directive At The Court Of Justice","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Market Law Review","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Polysemy; Directive; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Architecture; European court of justice; Sociology; Law and economics; European Union law; Linguistics; Business; Computer science; Philosophy; History; European union; Archaeology; International trade","score_opus":0.033063687092190985,"score_gpt":0.3626335181583459,"score_spread":0.3295698310661549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213270061","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.086708955,0.010107824,0.20200033,0.08774965,0.0010598082,0.0001689231,0.00020844852,0.000149163,0.6118469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9630007,0.0013939703,0.018328847,0.00529174,0.00057512306,0.00015264115,0.0000743727,0.00012156668,0.011061007],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98065037,0.0101558585,0.0007958796,0.0021080747,0.005216824,0.0010730355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866752,0.00873956,0.0009008981,0.0016599915,0.001704403,0.00032000116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01882005,0.0005368221,0.0009107917,0.0036999441,0.0059395065,0.012836902,0.0021586418,0.0066015352,0.003642164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019564344,0.0006884338,0.000817821,0.00254884,0.05961544,0.018840251,0.005633333,0.01062983,0.00048628944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029540809,0.0000016391461,0.000040676197,0.000008898681,0.0000011656722,0.000022617898,0.0016322972,0.000045422174,0.000045155863,0.99683577,0.00021822054,0.0011451694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013505979,0.000012524328,0.00035680772,0.00012751626,0.000007364716,0.000066353976,0.0010617365,0.0006115051,0.00014586542,0.9766297,0.02094931,0.000017876942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009965206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009624194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01882005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010036949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008686002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.099531114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217050785","doi":"10.54648/cola2021066","title":"Digital euro and ECB powers","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Market Law Review","topic":"European Monetary and Fiscal Policies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Competence (human resources); Cash; Economics; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Finance; Management","score_opus":0.029767458330708072,"score_gpt":0.22146996286004955,"score_spread":0.19170250452934148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3217050785","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04717457,0.05534302,0.0023659414,0.016183238,0.0007329621,0.0000256488,0.00023367233,0.0000324853,0.8779084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9000542,0.02906254,0.0014462295,0.009378206,0.0010631643,0.000076217555,0.00021617484,0.000053535558,0.05864972],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99452543,0.0021779349,0.00036274013,0.0008008252,0.0015496031,0.0005834461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99450004,0.002730132,0.0011163476,0.00060465495,0.0007230226,0.00032577498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047565564,0.00023956738,0.00026856168,0.002346934,0.0012989326,0.0097992765,0.0005830603,0.0029662736,0.012008362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014432,0.00017754408,0.00021425066,0.003064745,0.0063524065,0.005992241,0.0027814964,0.0021388237,0.0009761002],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016282347,0.0000061939245,0.0005056559,0.000056864425,0.0000042526635,0.000049200047,0.00031004447,0.0001368627,0.00004447003,0.98053277,0.0052135023,0.01312388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026446018,0.000046394867,0.009052343,0.0011216915,0.000021168578,0.00033529254,0.0015354935,0.00032802255,0.00041679508,0.21434774,0.77274185,0.000026801372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063080844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040271366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012008362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031228482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029127088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04017198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233276557","doi":"10.54648/cola2011025","title":"Case No. A 268/04, The Labour Court, Sweden (Arbetsdomstolen) Judgment No. 89/09 of 2 December 2009, <i>Laval un Partneri Ltd. v. Svenska Bygggnadsarbetareförbundet et al.</i>","year":2011,"lang":"sv","type":"article","venue":"Common Market Law Review","topic":"EU Law and Policy Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.05151180560228725,"score_gpt":0.3304842962688384,"score_spread":0.27897249066655117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233276557","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0134761715,0.018750228,0.0010195437,0.20810111,0.009636777,0.0005289488,0.004043121,0.0003262137,0.7441178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.064354345,0.005776131,0.0010220706,0.18130329,0.0024285314,0.0006238558,0.0017531593,0.00020870731,0.7425299],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99445677,0.000767238,0.00043739253,0.00086948945,0.0021967401,0.0012722951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966068,0.0014433633,0.0001968475,0.0001805861,0.0012978426,0.00027449988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004063585,0.0008721739,0.00087805075,0.0017826478,0.01081146,0.008181271,0.0026668934,0.027758805,0.03122808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013119134,0.0011618979,0.0012398561,0.0017334727,0.0024823959,0.0027427985,0.002516792,0.0124886,0.013423163],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008639331,0.000042762407,0.00065670465,0.00011876419,0.000018703848,0.00040786862,0.0005918295,0.000104886916,0.00033454824,0.04879185,0.944163,0.0046826163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009549579,0.000053807027,0.003934141,0.00078615756,0.00006900168,0.00017594424,0.001401277,0.00021929444,0.00077015685,0.009719149,0.9827042,0.000071317474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17634036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30169457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17634036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008521845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015256966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35062784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234088024","doi":"10.54648/cola2017115","title":"CETA on investment:the definitive surrender of eu law to gats and NAFTA/BITS","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Market Law Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Surrender; Investment (military); International trade; Economics; Law; Settlement (finance); Foreign direct investment; Domestic market; Politics; Political science; International economics; Law and economics; Finance","score_opus":0.05382080882661018,"score_gpt":0.292347867931513,"score_spread":0.23852705910490285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234088024","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026261792,0.06956222,0.006839392,0.12089575,0.0069372286,0.00008398122,0.00081376405,0.00015180575,0.7684542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5278952,0.050619654,0.011600974,0.14883819,0.0032566763,0.00022113266,0.0013659046,0.00022979821,0.2559725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944167,0.000984271,0.0003284256,0.0007356732,0.002962646,0.000572185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963678,0.0016511889,0.00035751564,0.00032439953,0.0011646312,0.0001345129],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048682005,0.00030823462,0.00047813405,0.0012972023,0.0019056757,0.007276415,0.000875207,0.0065272287,0.0028802701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012468497,0.00024898836,0.00047526526,0.0022451056,0.004015241,0.002679846,0.0018957477,0.006180395,0.0007425291],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002448749,0.000012440855,0.0005201111,0.00018270983,0.000012639735,0.00020007971,0.000629934,0.00017231524,0.00045594142,0.91660863,0.051949743,0.029231032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001053724,0.000019811929,0.0021371352,0.00043137302,0.000014902779,0.000171957,0.00022958417,0.00015228096,0.0006362143,0.034628995,0.96155053,0.000016802303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059090212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040737733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059090212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062933215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01339425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1174925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413867647","doi":"10.54648/cola2025079","title":"Editorial Comments: ReArm Europe/Readiness 2030: European defence in times of war","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Common Market Law Review","topic":"Defense, Military, and Policy Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economic history; History","score_opus":0.022049239929412035,"score_gpt":0.27068129136134755,"score_spread":0.2486320514319355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413867647","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006880317,0.0013277559,0.00006544409,0.2480433,0.74722767,0.000038356535,0.00019206876,0.00009141072,0.0029451882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013486142,0.0026339053,0.00013970354,0.2699275,0.6991827,0.0000892045,0.00014975759,0.00009661471,0.026431978],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965263,0.00050697377,0.0003744095,0.0006110441,0.0016041634,0.00037696963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98547953,0.0058679753,0.0007840388,0.00042775847,0.0055274,0.0019133252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057176384,0.003020059,0.0018368294,0.0020429806,0.0037935725,0.0064364127,0.0037125384,0.021864556,0.037907064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028223876,0.000962966,0.001769688,0.0011896011,0.0025168483,0.0045016436,0.0017883324,0.023166023,0.030479068],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013497066,0.000003768113,0.000016651336,0.00003591465,0.000001961323,0.00003998122,0.000010207337,0.0000048943307,0.000011732259,0.00008859822,0.9989604,0.00081236655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047934485,0.000021560545,0.00034942958,0.0003356377,0.000013333083,0.00012024726,0.00012781395,0.000066530265,0.00009099135,0.0005106865,0.998295,0.000020944444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044624424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077565014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037907064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040531326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003690289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12681174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}