{"meta":{"query_hash":"26f2b6b775d0","filters":{"venue":"Common Market Law Review"},"cohort_total":15,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":15,"exported":15,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/26f2b6b775d0","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Common+Market+Law+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1497257453","doi":"10.54648/cola2012036","title":"Administrative enforcement, judicial review and fundamental rights in EU competition law: A comparative contextual-functionalist perspective","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Market Law Review","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Judicial review; Law; Judicial independence; Enforcement; Legislature; Law and economics; Impartiality; Administrative law; Duty; Common law; Constitutional law; Competition law; Economics; Supreme court; Monopoly","score_opus":0.09602848179997853,"score_gpt":0.40362158559792294,"score_spread":0.3075931037979444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1497257453","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015724896,0.20783004,0.0000018418095,0.0025430066,0.00014686088,0.00079112354,0.000057131758,0.0000219898,0.7884508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8729589,0.1103249,0.00003293171,0.014215856,0.00020500715,0.00009764436,0.000058302594,0.0000070809065,0.0020993755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762106,0.0011043912,0.00042789915,0.00023521367,0.0003385297,0.0002729024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902445,0.00031509853,0.00021061616,0.00011719876,0.00019690323,0.00013571298],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001347863,0.00019155725,0.000576434,0.00002242296,0.0005842029,0.00004602045,0.00015685713,0.00003116802,0.002562959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008645798,0.0001656665,0.000100417186,0.00015970589,0.00086675084,0.0004402357,0.00008099837,0.00018361668,0.00008318908],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021741012,0.000113206384,0.000182349,0.00039300296,0.000053338703,0.000002588206,0.00084384606,7.7845215e-9,4.5199323e-7,0.977916,0.020423928,0.000049543978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002486244,0.0000703157,0.0009897932,0.0047564236,0.000105835104,0.0000056765634,0.0006636324,5.309032e-7,0.0000022467818,0.0027366118,0.990231,0.00018935307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004704502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024486873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9751794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029826857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036627946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99834883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1504669761","doi":"10.54648/cola2008093","title":"The Court of Justice and the social market economy: The emergence of an ideal and the conditions for its realization","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Market Law Review","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":166,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideal (ethics); European Union law; Directive; Law and economics; Treaty; Law; Action (physics); Treaty of Rome; Economics; Political science; Economic Justice; Sociology; Economic system; European integration; European union; International trade","score_opus":0.04842729060615897,"score_gpt":0.35571818000369765,"score_spread":0.3072908893975387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1504669761","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017102251,0.09688793,0.000035318764,0.047522914,0.0002138661,0.0018242621,0.00010637442,0.000012986439,0.8516861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60862005,0.38702476,0.000012133252,0.0023783427,0.00017097137,0.000096830154,0.000006352627,0.000007405128,0.001683183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980859,0.0012956618,0.0003070062,0.00009136982,0.00012482128,0.000095238356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99708444,0.002270037,0.00026773644,0.00013678949,0.00022165394,0.000019368917],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038120053,0.00006857392,0.00021766,0.0000046767714,0.0022377814,0.000026194692,0.0003212876,0.000016642782,0.0000850198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006547887,0.000029797515,0.000075904594,0.00007850142,0.0026713402,0.000096425596,0.00007014211,0.00005828093,5.721477e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006682858,0.0000070199076,0.000024172208,0.00017253179,0.000032762604,9.6052446e-8,0.00084015017,1.6355733e-7,2.236589e-7,0.92454845,0.07370497,0.00060266454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050599116,0.000019694931,0.0018935365,0.00019211536,0.00025753732,0.000002326719,0.00095623475,0.00034560414,0.0000014337044,0.016099216,0.97966576,0.000060567247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022640564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001539043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9084492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000067694336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003293936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99906117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1546133123","doi":"10.54648/cola2008073","title":"Industrial actions and EU economic freedoms: The autonomous collective bargaining model curtailed by the European Court of Justice","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Market Law Review","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Collective bargaining; Collective action; Directive; Law; Member state; Law and economics; European court of justice; Political science; Legislation; European Union law; European union; Economics; Member states; International trade","score_opus":0.07501387158550148,"score_gpt":0.3126066166264372,"score_spread":0.2375927450409357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1546133123","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048154728,0.012940432,0.000046296547,0.007364402,0.00021726245,0.00096103316,0.00012444398,0.000035031633,0.9734956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90751356,0.0798149,0.00006961274,0.006037553,0.00030326392,0.0000622403,0.000010341308,0.000027687618,0.0061608306],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789834,0.0013061902,0.00030882785,0.00016074571,0.00013919637,0.00018669936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987244,0.00056193536,0.00021590173,0.00037005576,0.00005579949,0.00007187876],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021667525,0.000110339184,0.00026094285,0.000012328077,0.0016524919,0.000042267533,0.00050095195,0.000040780324,0.00021591554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024868015,0.00006811593,0.00007253935,0.00016684305,0.00071593083,0.00012641687,0.00014466039,0.00022289167,0.000003204063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014037704,0.00006157734,0.0001690288,0.00003615291,0.000095920856,0.0000018847604,0.0020336427,0.000048367096,0.000007036008,0.45638314,0.535922,0.0052271946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031807803,0.000022928003,0.00041855258,0.00022801089,0.00023247507,0.000002735071,0.00046419626,0.0007538241,0.000001987636,0.0007602413,0.9966803,0.000116622534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019553723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020396682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9673348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000108264954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002750271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1569264908","doi":"10.54648/cola2012034","title":"New Categories of Acts after the Lisbon Reform: Dynamics of Parliamentarization in EU Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Market Law Review","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Treaty of Lisbon; Treaty; Legislature; Law; Political science; European union; Common law; European Union law; Commission; Politics; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.02456778212139421,"score_gpt":0.30697568035970674,"score_spread":0.2824078982383125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1569264908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012467463,0.0386571,0.000010831766,0.003324071,0.00017820905,0.00026539835,0.0000088478555,0.000008024827,0.9563008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94871455,0.04726134,0.00009462234,0.001909705,0.00006810808,0.000010580581,0.000010241014,0.0000072428375,0.0019236123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989212,0.00033437708,0.00031559868,0.000066842964,0.00022422224,0.00013775972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999466,0.000101081256,0.00017022334,0.00015876742,0.00006534534,0.00003860679],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011114869,0.00007238635,0.00021923947,0.000011466219,0.000076779485,0.000011650088,0.00022495186,0.000022867483,0.00032135166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000072066636,0.000047839152,0.000059442627,0.00015177704,0.0002445889,0.00023611529,0.000081995764,0.00006800893,0.0000075241164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015752319,0.000026435186,0.0043322826,0.00024902105,0.0000113802025,2.558304e-7,0.00047034494,4.7513467e-8,9.098997e-7,0.991134,0.001694636,0.0020649433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006400643,0.000014383134,0.0056611383,0.0010046506,0.000028309942,3.3905488e-7,0.00024632705,0.0000026995297,0.000017474149,0.0015727498,0.99132246,0.000065437554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017546553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.076159954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98962784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014861964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024385412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9889957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1587344662","doi":"10.54648/cola2013136","title":"What if Cassis de Dijon were Cassis de Quebec? The assimilation of goods of third country origin in the internal market","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Market Law Review","topic":"European Political History Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Member state; Member states; Mutual recognition; State (computer science); Business; Economics; Commerce; International trade; Law and economics; European union; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.034145899939111095,"score_gpt":0.2772747855827129,"score_spread":0.2431288856436018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1587344662","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019753607,0.04355762,0.000019086518,0.005285851,0.0003038905,0.0007377052,0.00006559655,0.000029319597,0.9302473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9481679,0.02392425,0.000044381944,0.0074961525,0.00021440927,0.00008349388,0.000019128162,0.00003629039,0.020013979],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965196,0.0019963395,0.0007311619,0.00017734291,0.00029755136,0.00027796035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977558,0.0010438272,0.0003670815,0.00066454266,0.00010599283,0.00006272544],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026277604,0.00019554155,0.00053612335,0.000049683174,0.0001628248,0.00016591253,0.00065819366,0.000047684647,0.009162272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017032136,0.00011288023,0.0002568694,0.00010781475,0.00060762826,0.00043646345,0.00008861406,0.0003169855,0.000027427315],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050998526,0.00025440435,0.008430586,0.0043482715,0.00022146209,0.000024157573,0.0052560326,0.0000027350154,0.000008304276,0.47972924,0.48834324,0.013330564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000112004775,0.00003211901,0.012712736,0.0035188654,0.0003261431,0.000010420712,0.0007557251,0.000312985,0.000005777444,0.0012284961,0.98083663,0.00014809667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021835329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059974026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9284143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001848248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000062066654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9917435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148846432","doi":"","title":"Case No. A 268/04, The Labour Court, Sweden (Arbetsdomstolen) Judgment No. 89/09 of 2 December 2009, Laval un Partneri Ltd. v. Svenska Bygggnadsarbetareförbundet et al.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Market Law Review","topic":"EU Law and Policy Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.05620328959035989,"score_gpt":0.34170859251448626,"score_spread":0.28550530292412635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148846432","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009765629,0.07482982,0.000018989658,0.020705942,0.00061781186,0.0015357723,0.00030192608,0.00013457144,0.89208955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45796272,0.38397536,0.0013539721,0.123985864,0.00064487057,0.00039525997,0.00008217252,0.00015148192,0.0314483],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936648,0.0032812615,0.0010208876,0.00050201494,0.00078133086,0.00074971985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965203,0.00072082813,0.0006316576,0.0012438954,0.0005143963,0.0003689547],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060217734,0.00042707942,0.0011209849,0.000051632334,0.00076934055,0.00008377035,0.0010100106,0.00016644268,0.007937825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048598286,0.00030730065,0.00061388005,0.0006242654,0.0007937301,0.0002870963,0.00026112914,0.00046771413,0.0006401852],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001043909,0.0004448984,0.0010897558,0.0011307818,0.00058863853,0.00051862927,0.001606197,0.0000015025015,0.000014354011,0.15861253,0.82913,0.006758339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028279636,0.00007538928,0.00017752018,0.0009805977,0.0005622964,0.00007874244,0.000092881186,0.000017656968,0.00003235571,0.0011572251,0.9961604,0.00038217625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03542647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06185959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86064124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008472707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002319415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2206403926","doi":"10.54648/cola2014090","title":"Before the law stands a gatekeeper Or, what is a regulatory act in Article 263(4) TFEU? <i>Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Market Law Review","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Common law; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.0156995851503625,"score_gpt":0.2560694885331365,"score_spread":0.240369903382774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2206403926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08694704,0.121960364,0.000027373932,0.071155325,0.001086088,0.003291843,0.000015258193,0.0005826924,0.71493405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89345604,0.003089697,0.000021871374,0.1011672,0.0003354167,0.000063509775,0.000011400272,0.000039540704,0.0018153087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981788,0.000156113,0.00055539934,0.00035196645,0.00038496396,0.00037277688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985745,0.00008217323,0.00032737805,0.0008758392,0.00010780153,0.000032336942],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019097732,0.00027408518,0.00052414666,0.00005432956,0.0002347182,0.0007485139,0.0005502516,0.00008074129,0.0034670786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011171405,0.00017332248,0.00015863254,0.0005935498,0.00015310741,0.002055606,0.0002422892,0.00026817646,0.00045104968],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008619877,0.00013015952,0.003099401,0.0036662482,0.000042778363,0.000023074484,0.0004326906,0.0000014095672,0.000011335698,0.77640855,0.11334886,0.10274932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038767347,0.000013291348,0.0025490634,0.0030191191,0.000075643686,0.0000032734504,0.00010463157,0.00037415596,0.0000144402,0.0035518887,0.98967993,0.0002268733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016846273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022479258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8763311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052193474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016077687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626036725","doi":"10.54648/cola2017090","title":"Genetically modified crops, agricultural sustainability and national opt-outs: Enclosure as the loophole?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Market Law Review","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast; Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Sustainability; Agricultural biodiversity; Context (archaeology); Business; Natural resource economics; Agriculture; Liability; Directive; Precautionary principle; Agricultural biotechnology; Economics; Biotechnology; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.031709889526320395,"score_gpt":0.30283080908494725,"score_spread":0.2711209195586268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2626036725","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7343006,0.030764699,0.0000031205327,0.103039995,0.00011568026,0.0023383151,0.00007020767,0.00007475833,0.12929262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98832387,0.0075659617,0.000064614316,0.0020935435,0.00014812806,0.00008334298,0.000023040793,0.0000022208887,0.0016952596],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974717,0.0005346198,0.00037325377,0.0004904482,0.00069098244,0.00043901626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981468,0.0004957026,0.0001510457,0.00037802104,0.00059490476,0.00023353833],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016715706,0.00023981753,0.0003650371,0.0000043885443,0.0013707833,0.00054914615,0.0013310356,0.00012551788,0.0014802642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013828336,0.00007517589,0.00014338455,0.0001265759,0.0007916075,0.00013592241,0.0008017925,0.00032992408,0.0000694616],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002449376,0.00069848757,0.011012691,0.0028797484,0.00020148125,0.00009013516,0.000100033765,0.000008475466,0.021410955,0.29044276,0.051909495,0.6210008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019644121,0.00018953568,0.7690518,0.0002922273,0.000048297457,0.00006883434,0.000038531747,0.00005328106,0.00024886586,0.019614115,0.20983753,0.0003605826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00067343086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007426608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75803906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000064624524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047704147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998769526","doi":"10.54648/cola2019126","title":"Taking the enforcement of labour standards in the EUs free trade agreements seriously","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Market Law Review","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; International trade; Business; Free trade; International economics; Economics; Law and economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.023878453917204737,"score_gpt":0.3479850146021997,"score_spread":0.324106560684995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998769526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01471627,0.012247123,0.0000029540872,0.010968234,0.00028846387,0.0011893293,0.00010821424,0.000012815345,0.9604666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9770241,0.012988253,0.000015498697,0.008177535,0.00005339619,0.00003799539,0.0000062513204,0.000006945588,0.0016900293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997608,0.00073241437,0.00035623784,0.00012345747,0.00096620416,0.00021368926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999024,0.00024148863,0.00021582976,0.0004247816,0.00006865352,0.000025253585],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004655216,0.00009793199,0.00023264892,0.000015264464,0.00017791303,0.000050338804,0.0010724514,0.000031419073,0.0066832067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015265202,0.0000560055,0.000098609475,0.00024397603,0.00012702117,0.000115000934,0.00009143845,0.00013399818,0.000011115007],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001278629,0.000032862194,0.002363248,0.00035599634,0.000020396887,0.000002221852,0.0009126551,0.0000013363295,0.0000026273462,0.98362994,0.008275763,0.0043901782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019747052,0.000032045213,0.005155651,0.0011043029,0.000018118824,6.4086504e-7,0.00021762813,0.0000042364586,0.000006382585,0.0020817535,0.9911094,0.00007238564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009027216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020469312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9828336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000112365015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000078681616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99757177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125533736","doi":"10.54648/cola2007113","title":"The double-headed approach of the ECJ concerning consumer protection","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Market Law Review","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":125,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legislature; Legislation; Treaty; Consumer protection; Scope (computer science); Interpretation (philosophy); Common law; Economic Justice; Precedent; Political science; Business; Economics; Law and economics","score_opus":0.05269716247314966,"score_gpt":0.25396760972226523,"score_spread":0.20127044724911558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125533736","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0149097,0.08027422,0.00032298782,0.0034941267,0.00081964093,0.0034402106,0.0000026014175,0.0001173077,0.8966192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871759,0.00550449,0.00003412741,0.0050474885,0.00041576425,0.00009632901,0.0000070065794,0.000031897034,0.0016869876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988412,0.00004474634,0.00043571106,0.00017549407,0.0002758837,0.00022695184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985983,0.00007941172,0.00066059304,0.000524879,0.00012813245,0.0000086871905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021500764,0.00014760578,0.00027777086,0.000014071479,0.00039535473,0.000097699914,0.00044027113,0.000046299556,0.00012205634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000621426,0.00008028152,0.00014988057,0.0004755634,0.00021097582,0.0002846751,0.0001970068,0.00022000399,0.000034671717],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040980655,0.00013701261,0.010146794,0.010925018,0.000109007524,0.0000054639636,0.000018105477,0.000004513933,0.00029257854,0.7156455,0.07531601,0.18699019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029923947,0.000002916886,0.0038235984,0.0013057602,0.00008122176,0.0000037203447,0.000013771712,0.00010616837,0.00006222267,0.00047833263,0.9937071,0.000115919895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007690571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006484324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9722662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023677381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015934085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32737854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213270061","doi":"10.54648/cola2021108","title":"The Polysemy Of Anti-Discrimination Law: The Interpretation Architecture Of The Framework Employment Directive At The Court Of Justice","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Market Law Review","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Polysemy; Directive; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Architecture; European court of justice; Sociology; Law and economics; European Union law; Linguistics; Business; Computer science; Philosophy; History; European union; Archaeology; International trade","score_opus":0.033063687092190985,"score_gpt":0.3626335181583459,"score_spread":0.3295698310661549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213270061","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016995588,0.065260686,0.0007367124,0.14647555,0.0013537694,0.0023867688,0.000093236005,0.0000349857,0.7666627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98247665,0.013218506,0.000049879603,0.002984284,0.00003962864,0.000036323254,0.000005029705,0.000008819745,0.0011808756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99536526,0.003232004,0.00048863504,0.00014412915,0.0006201557,0.00014982121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959142,0.0025977816,0.0005253087,0.0006057574,0.00032832337,0.000028579652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003115788,0.00010840221,0.00029163115,0.000007947813,0.0007688938,0.000040119598,0.0006530334,0.00005721472,0.00018845694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013439553,0.00004805861,0.00023891531,0.00037750657,0.0012677552,0.000066756664,0.00022152593,0.00020177106,0.0000021076726],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021494736,0.000062316314,0.00010489286,0.00072004634,0.00005439341,2.1739002e-7,0.008207562,0.000007891112,0.000034649212,0.9600111,0.0027067515,0.02806866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021578415,0.000057591427,0.013197669,0.0088751195,0.001450901,0.0000038694543,0.0069843186,0.00008002553,0.002636053,0.093582526,0.87266195,0.00025419635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010897202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0136162685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96548104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058979564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007468218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75981975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217050785","doi":"10.54648/cola2021066","title":"Digital euro and ECB powers","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Market Law Review","topic":"European Monetary and Fiscal Policies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Competence (human resources); Cash; Economics; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Finance; Management","score_opus":0.029767458330708072,"score_gpt":0.22146996286004955,"score_spread":0.19170250452934148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3217050785","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017968959,0.28231657,0.00001583103,0.0017828112,0.00009927791,0.0000756672,0.000085774,0.000022012411,0.71380514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45610464,0.46764523,0.00026131354,0.034299016,0.00018481656,0.000012684283,0.000120412435,0.00007843343,0.04129345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990901,0.000040165083,0.000410112,0.00026824672,0.000021542826,0.00016985115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933344,0.00007731552,0.00011534168,0.0003695326,0.000012847044,0.00009150018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030222227,0.00012310271,0.00042578348,0.000020217816,0.00007000292,0.0001047369,0.00013726196,0.00002738882,0.0008831639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012628736,0.00013193199,0.00010831251,0.00013856728,0.00008907579,0.00021684887,0.00014527343,0.00011779552,0.0005121045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000091520415,0.00008524436,0.025402397,0.0017822821,0.00006970991,0.00014602918,0.00002797297,3.861319e-7,0.0000014959039,0.84017015,0.104600325,0.027704887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000098233504,0.000016824553,0.009464805,0.00030101032,0.000008046858,0.000035431396,0.0000022029021,0.00001707808,0.0000020951345,0.0058801435,0.9840126,0.00016150836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010486664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006997819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8794123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009681315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000036591869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9670025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233276557","doi":"10.54648/cola2011025","title":"Case No. A 268/04, The Labour Court, Sweden (Arbetsdomstolen) Judgment No. 89/09 of 2 December 2009, <i>Laval un Partneri Ltd. v. Svenska Bygggnadsarbetareförbundet et al.</i>","year":2011,"lang":"sv","type":"article","venue":"Common Market Law Review","topic":"EU Law and Policy Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.05151180560228725,"score_gpt":0.3304842962688384,"score_spread":0.27897249066655117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233276557","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008830419,0.23804952,0.000015021385,0.033167835,0.0015637549,0.0027876438,0.0010935476,0.00014488446,0.71434736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23373893,0.590412,0.00063427293,0.1460953,0.00071401097,0.00030978402,0.00009773021,0.00018662197,0.027811348],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867763,0.006943865,0.0022966447,0.0010645961,0.0014408052,0.0014778145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928016,0.0013921773,0.0016612461,0.0024422072,0.00096362515,0.0007391118],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009585298,0.0010217937,0.002515822,0.000086660235,0.001326693,0.00019219962,0.0019866123,0.00037240583,0.014213835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00062644295,0.0007613574,0.0014756828,0.00131027,0.0017446998,0.0005056377,0.00063932035,0.0010729487,0.0017038939],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002161651,0.00094401144,0.0007363948,0.0033584046,0.0014164919,0.0010328648,0.0021909715,0.0000026476116,0.000023368457,0.07191818,0.9117173,0.0064431764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060115644,0.00022384097,0.00014910671,0.003649599,0.0022546696,0.00023324965,0.00018656893,0.000052119103,0.00005700361,0.00097534264,0.99072737,0.00088996586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04737336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058113653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.686536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016913725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048651992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234088024","doi":"10.54648/cola2017115","title":"CETA on investment:the definitive surrender of eu law to gats and NAFTA/BITS","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Market Law Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Surrender; Investment (military); International trade; Economics; Law; Settlement (finance); Foreign direct investment; Domestic market; Politics; Political science; International economics; Law and economics; Finance","score_opus":0.05382080882661018,"score_gpt":0.292347867931513,"score_spread":0.23852705910490285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234088024","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018256143,0.0025154771,0.0000019220424,0.01033866,0.00021374377,0.00053143344,0.000009071159,0.000021249323,0.98454285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5511839,0.001550613,0.00004817656,0.4460211,0.0002045135,0.00006292902,0.000028776014,0.000020240284,0.0008797726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899524,0.000050343417,0.00032073705,0.00021770912,0.00026215368,0.00015383415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888664,0.000094284704,0.0003463862,0.0005023948,0.00014645296,0.000023834235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065831357,0.00016976651,0.00029250063,0.00003404605,0.0004309703,0.00026318996,0.00043022566,0.000030097133,0.0004868724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017163144,0.00011883515,0.00008488293,0.00007079978,0.0002235075,0.0005329114,0.00025563655,0.000106967964,0.00021912942],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017777285,0.000043325716,0.00020208546,0.0005916116,0.00002613999,0.0000025661436,0.0000046252862,1.3773659e-7,0.000007218706,0.96392775,0.03448493,0.00069183204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023445,0.000018398941,0.004084871,0.0018267959,0.00006332331,0.0000016754973,0.000003218312,0.000047063008,0.000054516844,0.013211994,0.98030597,0.00014769648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004931589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00055133615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9836631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000143804355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008125809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5330911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413867647","doi":"10.54648/cola2025079","title":"Editorial Comments: ReArm Europe/Readiness 2030: European defence in times of war","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Common Market Law Review","topic":"Defense, Military, and Policy Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economic history; History","score_opus":0.022049239929412035,"score_gpt":0.27068129136134755,"score_spread":0.2486320514319355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413867647","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000017068369,0.17802808,9.4475274e-7,0.00028262785,0.45810857,0.00036249723,0.0011887699,0.000023802128,0.362003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000060972056,0.4311272,0.000038273047,0.0007033794,0.5610208,0.00005307894,0.00037628453,0.000074145784,0.006545875],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99549073,0.00059235445,0.002318679,0.00085732667,0.00021038034,0.00053050695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99577016,0.0013996877,0.0010706892,0.0013748314,0.0002775072,0.00010712057],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004061477,0.00062082225,0.0027292613,0.00025395176,0.00012918343,0.000040146464,0.001348395,0.0003575633,0.0005497761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030695465,0.0006635698,0.00041220864,0.00072158215,0.00027417645,0.0001569566,0.0006791014,0.0009821054,0.0004500557],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004831828,0.00011661517,0.00035065247,0.0075968998,0.0001274125,0.00001133783,0.000047367965,3.3787478e-7,2.8741653e-8,0.012810056,0.9781582,0.00073280965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005719093,0.00006907694,0.000110236884,0.008195918,0.00008667094,5.6075413e-7,0.0000038605376,0.0000024144947,2.9486733e-7,0.0020551484,0.9883726,0.00053127453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025216786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005363007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35545713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014870448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009036693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}