{"meta":{"query_hash":"ecd61003508b","filters":{"venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin"},"cohort_total":25,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":25,"exported":25,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ecd61003508b","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Commonwealth+Law+Bulletin"},"results":[{"id":"W1972015922","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2012.694998","title":"International practice of Public Legal Education: a missing element in the justice system of Bangladesh","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Empowerment; Transformative learning; Relevance (law); Economic Justice; Element (criminal law); Public relations; Subject (documents); Political science; Process (computing); Order (exchange); Sociology; Public administration; Engineering ethics; Law; Business; Engineering; Computer science; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.06442253769063168,"score_gpt":0.4049741958835994,"score_spread":0.34055165819296773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972015922","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002467168,0.0003423982,0.00011676888,0.33681828,0.0013533605,0.00024587382,0.0000047853196,0.000011997406,0.6586394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99113,0.00004463221,0.0024705862,0.0052610035,0.00057459425,0.000045854355,0.00001577984,0.0000060694433,0.00045150288],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974961,0.001166214,0.0005058285,0.000095049436,0.00049393764,0.00024282071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968795,0.0016990366,0.0005626753,0.0002269179,0.00054339104,0.00008844876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005526328,0.000068925794,0.00011734562,0.000095674885,0.00033240148,0.00012004379,0.00044231827,0.000056107885,0.0007047412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027313058,0.000060328515,0.00003231492,0.000504546,0.00016821848,0.0006080847,0.00003457325,0.00028932106,0.000040105675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011686857,0.0006536138,0.00084012875,0.00009887745,0.000009959187,1.9594549e-7,0.015196942,9.319519e-7,0.000006391983,0.9532322,0.026338233,0.0036108186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000117115575,0.000012390846,0.0006204228,0.000048716563,0.000036628462,0.0000071484233,0.090661414,0.000005051475,0.000011817528,0.00003878762,0.9083897,0.000050814186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014179728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006111886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98866284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021841285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010260297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9923849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014237474","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2011.595151","title":"Custom as a source of law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04170517480488936,"score_gpt":0.2968302301115839,"score_spread":0.2551250553066945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014237474","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011692636,0.00038444993,0.000016275122,0.0050899517,0.00021643176,0.00020399512,0.0000034033928,0.00012137165,0.9822715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98028487,0.00020082973,0.0008459369,0.008027282,0.00018852111,0.00001760584,0.000003229555,0.000016429127,0.01041529],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855983,0.0002766424,0.0002536823,0.00018791172,0.00034065146,0.0003813085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915093,0.00009701084,0.00015539129,0.00028124204,0.00011384541,0.00020156961],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007302913,0.00011228749,0.00021793887,0.000003573145,0.0008175312,0.000023207836,0.0004808264,0.00020957974,0.0063767554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004843336,0.00010198234,0.00013093546,0.00012213178,0.0011466638,0.000046731242,0.00008175327,0.0002403165,0.0006966665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019084031,0.000095474614,0.00014282296,0.000021217586,0.0000103408975,0.0000022342022,0.047386535,4.1268484e-7,0.00001086768,0.92420673,0.027732456,0.00037180356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019777384,0.00005390614,0.000048440168,0.000024990366,0.000012628896,0.0000011968891,0.0059692664,3.3085615e-7,0.00032226281,0.0125987595,0.98064846,0.00012198069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06077877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059035067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9718562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046592766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008321998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9945316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016150660","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2012.748258","title":"Private international law and the Internet, 2nd edn","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Law; Political science; Conflict of laws; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.01425567974650163,"score_gpt":0.27534418013345546,"score_spread":0.26108850038695386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016150660","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03572308,0.00030487753,0.00007483338,0.17140679,0.00072877173,0.00046057603,0.0000021232574,0.00008548937,0.79121345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790417,0.00027089447,0.00013643842,0.0129015595,0.00040281616,0.000053810214,0.0000042664196,0.0000092648925,0.0071792835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888813,0.00023512205,0.00021620115,0.00016412669,0.00025859525,0.00023781146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992875,0.0002420449,0.00009995891,0.00016704819,0.000081155566,0.00012228754],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082140346,0.00008905546,0.00013199767,0.000016871041,0.00055943656,0.00028041075,0.0003528589,0.000066942695,0.0031707266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005228857,0.00006455928,0.000046484027,0.00004867927,0.00097197545,0.00008802264,0.00015194823,0.0001819672,0.00036076864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022964548,0.000019728404,0.00033620157,0.0000036292406,0.000011571333,6.4740107e-7,0.0030864265,2.6347703e-7,0.0000028795316,0.97593224,0.017168302,0.0034151238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005939683,0.000018895145,0.0010632735,0.00001821558,0.000005403198,0.0000015928764,0.00034170525,0.000057096815,0.00000977536,0.010769521,0.9870439,0.00007664398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07069427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008850611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96987563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047694153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018266695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017292580","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2010.500831","title":"Supreme Court of Canada – structure, status and challenges","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Original jurisdiction; Mandate; Jurisdiction; Remand (court procedure); Political science; Judicial independence; Administrative law; Court of record; Certiorari","score_opus":0.026019683573685455,"score_gpt":0.262253881313707,"score_spread":0.23623419774002158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017292580","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.447686,0.011650722,0.0000016315228,0.11107665,0.0013136165,0.00031505738,0.00013339131,0.000049211394,0.42777374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99701697,0.0020095354,0.0000959608,0.0006343732,0.00016019074,0.0000034175168,0.000002096775,0.0000037573136,0.00007369254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906665,0.000064828295,0.00014801927,0.0001268768,0.00028928113,0.00030435144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993884,0.00016768806,0.000070961134,0.00009695094,0.00010732847,0.00016867298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024361743,0.000075520475,0.00016364032,0.000011760981,0.0006728888,0.000011388425,0.00012606455,0.000056861307,0.00032966014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012144375,0.00006948282,0.000015135476,0.000044080505,0.0008142494,0.000017448752,0.000059227583,0.00016119127,0.0000021225242],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008740721,0.0000113570695,0.0031176123,0.000016071328,0.000012335806,0.0000015435405,0.00068645924,4.0794677e-7,0.00002193346,0.9893453,0.0049417964,0.0018364582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011409729,0.000015012173,0.018382344,0.000009339844,0.0000059249032,5.837569e-7,0.00102124,3.2527467e-7,0.000033322834,0.013521225,0.96681875,0.00007781271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92894256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9955924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97582406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037283153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060047174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5175385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035219757","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2011.548139","title":"Residential real estate brokerage services under attack in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Real estate; Commission; Listing (finance); Commonwealth; Competition (biology); Business; Tribunal; Service (business); Estate; Finance; Law; Accounting; Political science; Marketing","score_opus":0.04519890385538514,"score_gpt":0.235182911203393,"score_spread":0.18998400734800786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035219757","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3884594,0.000037946716,0.000041412346,0.004352215,0.0011044547,0.00022318284,0.000015613301,0.00008265932,0.6056831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987735,0.00012492534,0.00012696313,0.01084402,0.0005626719,0.000013116215,0.00006098834,0.00003093878,0.00050142757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985073,0.000027391645,0.0004448035,0.00028937968,0.0003158436,0.00041528858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933434,0.00005777775,0.00021586209,0.00026152123,0.000096924465,0.00003357659],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025079565,0.0001821119,0.00022552986,0.00007801036,0.00015547148,0.00011812263,0.00048424528,0.000055112545,0.0017148603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014416206,0.00018459512,0.000040955132,0.000121491925,0.00009465168,0.0002149947,0.0001884391,0.00020195813,0.00038035668],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035887025,0.00029018434,0.14630827,0.0009118605,0.00006462215,0.00039539562,0.0004057248,0.00051888113,0.000013645304,0.7329154,0.11651203,0.0013051336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010236013,0.000015032629,0.218074,0.0001184778,0.000023450757,0.0000034933612,0.0006235765,0.0010329813,0.000028607037,0.0045916326,0.7740417,0.00042344365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9946685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9962466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72832376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020991015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013433737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038699022","doi":"10.1080/03050710903573472","title":"Keeping the statute book up to date: a personal view","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Legislation; Statutory law; Law; Political science; Principal (computer security); State (computer science); Statute of limitations; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.04471371080242119,"score_gpt":0.36350627293524973,"score_spread":0.3187925621328285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038699022","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05333295,0.0019467005,0.00012427586,0.291763,0.0021151511,0.0007254386,0.000031108084,0.00011329338,0.6498481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9403096,0.00028916838,0.00021100426,0.043183114,0.0006961849,0.000089574234,0.000006354014,0.000012163229,0.015202856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863714,0.00020504743,0.00020539011,0.00020829156,0.00038705266,0.00035710793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903363,0.00038329657,0.00007399232,0.00018442747,0.00016642245,0.0001582134],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009021928,0.00011172041,0.00016966241,0.0000205303,0.0017179505,0.0001219858,0.0004835767,0.000039885672,0.0029783042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013280618,0.00008360439,0.00006541141,0.00011415945,0.00041637314,0.000057688456,0.00017369185,0.00034115146,0.0011620709],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015552256,0.000015746602,0.00012742824,0.000004623024,0.000013671738,0.0000012073132,0.010318328,4.4557265e-7,0.000023716075,0.7144614,0.27349496,0.0015229331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000105602405,0.000029651103,0.00083281606,0.000023025712,0.000005310327,8.9599496e-7,0.0015088441,0.0000076327415,0.000026335847,0.0005413452,0.99681,0.000108517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00740141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03163564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88697666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039778562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001086154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062193801","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2005.9986684","title":"The introduction of the Caribbean court of justice and the likely impact on human rights standards in the Caribbean commonwealth","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"World Federation of Science Journalists","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Law; Political science; Human rights; Economic Justice; Caribbean region; Latin Americans","score_opus":0.020487581469675917,"score_gpt":0.28968576584953515,"score_spread":0.2691981843798592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062193801","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4430211,0.0010671753,0.00009583851,0.45280644,0.0016348673,0.0022816253,0.00020442078,0.0000726088,0.09881593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937561,0.000058497586,0.000015277321,0.004066333,0.0019287004,0.000020640025,0.00002335722,0.000019265595,0.00011179946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976786,0.0002907353,0.0006866498,0.00024002869,0.00076209387,0.00034193866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99755037,0.0007559833,0.0006521402,0.000710672,0.00031142496,0.000019426929],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036191111,0.00022981406,0.00035262606,0.00006250222,0.0013098214,0.00019176053,0.0009928645,0.00007464858,0.00007417579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002581643,0.00009786721,0.00014133075,0.0002233509,0.0013968678,0.00011049257,0.00018879515,0.00051639014,0.000008864369],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031659743,0.00012797963,0.0010696684,0.00011937131,0.0000356964,7.0459606e-7,0.00044136925,0.00038154854,0.0000051667143,0.8838046,0.11333278,0.00036449623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017564797,0.00008803882,0.022414375,0.00008614241,0.00015700898,0.000004910591,0.0006378821,0.00081302505,0.000049818274,0.013250385,0.96058273,0.00015920853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01642397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015244747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87055427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013812732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045880544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063086196","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2010.481400","title":"Must terrorists act for a cause? The motivational requirement in definitions of terrorism in the United Kingdom, Canada, New Zealand and Australia","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Commonwealth; Law; Ideology; Kingdom; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.12244266725346552,"score_gpt":0.3591118586053519,"score_spread":0.23666919135188635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063086196","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9126415,0.000016658518,0.000017192144,0.08562729,0.000406931,0.0006620456,0.000081528946,0.00001120597,0.00053560495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99612755,0.000020775215,0.00004758916,0.0032332102,0.00023251142,0.000089220266,0.00003517693,0.000010877856,0.00020312247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798286,0.00033896958,0.00049116276,0.00022930859,0.00041677014,0.00054090377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99811476,0.0011712551,0.00016534035,0.0003023772,0.000078782505,0.00016745825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013299235,0.00016084306,0.00021831474,0.00008274834,0.00040112349,0.000056570785,0.00052116707,0.00012881873,0.00013444346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030445805,0.000113107184,0.000042242318,0.0002881996,0.00046728848,0.000053754007,0.00004682034,0.000490571,0.0000024431636],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019047938,0.00046858043,0.17375916,0.00014145709,0.000043286713,0.000039663453,0.14086466,0.000022789503,0.00008632623,0.5119386,0.17180067,0.0006443263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013824262,0.00011974369,0.26321596,0.000186388,0.000029610903,0.0000088998295,0.027178042,0.000044565608,0.000019423362,0.007154557,0.70036924,0.00029117183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9321994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9774889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52856857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013519202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056529423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4612377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073883360","doi":"10.1080/03050710701747328","title":"Change of Political Allegiance in Parliamentary Life","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament","funders":"","keywords":"Allegiance; Parliament; House of Commons; Politics; Law; Constitution; Political science; Conscience; Parliamentary sovereignty; Sociology","score_opus":0.0683611379097948,"score_gpt":0.3400177201564915,"score_spread":0.2716565822466967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073883360","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15882836,0.0047722533,0.00006943652,0.12555964,0.00061794836,0.00057671574,0.0000218738,0.000068774934,0.709485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98856634,0.00022843808,0.00014005962,0.01059718,0.00040966825,0.000015167022,0.0000021079115,0.0000037903917,0.00003722435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872005,0.000099028235,0.00027910608,0.00012860922,0.00027791015,0.0004952755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993504,0.00024531592,0.00006260841,0.00008501314,0.00005054427,0.00020609454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095396163,0.00007198324,0.00018822514,0.000034210523,0.00028161993,0.0000066222797,0.00017107383,0.00006325935,0.0002759856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000121499346,0.000072499584,0.00003909762,0.00014993566,0.0008918106,0.000031030788,0.00006198026,0.00012504312,0.000070228736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030586678,0.00008583815,0.024246272,0.000008629782,0.000004806015,0.0000089382875,0.0011934282,1.3360814e-7,0.0000013150416,0.9708027,0.0021552718,0.0014620796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026545717,0.00003885029,0.08399222,0.00006539031,0.00000405754,2.9817713e-7,0.0058085844,3.2088997e-7,0.000015063928,0.011153323,0.8985489,0.000107550615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2551026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10775455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9596494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001133653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000097924836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9085266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089150328","doi":"10.1080/03050710902726931","title":"Provincial law reform agencies in Canada: are they really that different from the Scottish Law Commission?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Law; Mandate; Political science; Law reform; Work (physics); Agency (philosophy); Public administration; State (computer science); Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.04327491989774831,"score_gpt":0.31085825604174966,"score_spread":0.26758333614400137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089150328","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0423354,0.00015410043,0.0000017241022,0.4441271,0.0005776585,0.00045954785,0.00010617423,0.000056943773,0.51218134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94824725,0.00007533473,0.00007693878,0.050326187,0.00034618247,0.000031273168,0.000057311277,0.000011547193,0.0008279509],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975445,0.0006618446,0.00042273343,0.0002614651,0.0006349931,0.0004744654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821955,0.0006328364,0.0003281565,0.00046855194,0.00014151003,0.00020938902],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008939195,0.00017828956,0.00025538518,0.0000207176,0.0019199505,0.00030119804,0.00072555774,0.00010954061,0.00068803626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018366509,0.00012783472,0.00004678071,0.00020071056,0.00025932534,0.00019494849,0.00007050802,0.000769315,0.00003261611],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032845943,0.00011303006,0.0031283258,0.0000050407384,0.0000073570836,0.000007633761,0.008098878,0.0000016767009,0.000003327455,0.91662186,0.07118442,0.0007955755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002184378,0.00002322943,0.053017285,0.00007162141,0.000009754601,6.8478454e-7,0.010966761,0.0000026038856,0.00002058365,0.007022994,0.928482,0.00016402667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9986262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9095989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020062719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025157463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095019064","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2002.9986631","title":"Improving legislative drafting capacity","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Legislation; Law; Principal (computer security); Political science; Legislative assembly; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.038789550395226136,"score_gpt":0.27908085905250163,"score_spread":0.2402913086572755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095019064","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008659726,0.00043537506,0.00045802412,0.009518951,0.00027667513,0.00020935683,0.0000048302127,0.00016283647,0.9802742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899762,0.000021858348,0.0010458945,0.0036535787,0.00032951444,0.0000143297075,0.0000025879656,0.000012287123,0.004943694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986138,0.00032434246,0.00021903009,0.00019711291,0.0002602863,0.0003854801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992682,0.00020557822,0.0001309992,0.00017054123,0.00008523349,0.00013947347],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006032444,0.000099059325,0.00014029832,0.000028971188,0.000907574,0.00012097947,0.00022450933,0.00008884004,0.0035764463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033569333,0.00009830301,0.000059994243,0.00012022844,0.00024828885,0.00015838617,0.000042452328,0.00025224054,0.00076661265],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012711578,0.00010157592,0.0005754634,0.000039652994,0.000016515185,0.000016356365,0.4231924,0.0000057121206,0.00021322709,0.5208194,0.013164141,0.04184281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001539789,0.000038477137,0.0000435938,0.000028251972,0.000005950904,8.595622e-7,0.00093638484,0.00040029158,0.00013454778,0.0001714499,0.9979526,0.00013363977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048718475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008636263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9847884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013429223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021625005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2549189372","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2016.1259077","title":"Aboriginal oral testimony, hearsay rule and the reception theory of admissibility","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Law; Admissible evidence; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.033796973113345584,"score_gpt":0.3644389456552977,"score_spread":0.33064197254195216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2549189372","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74205303,0.0026084112,0.0024276217,0.14650811,0.0006938808,0.0011497973,0.00004674636,0.0002737023,0.10423872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995414,0.0004741719,0.0013158786,0.0010133537,0.00009174741,0.000016216469,6.668045e-7,0.000010616499,0.0016633068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744445,0.0012992371,0.00033563923,0.00024896706,0.00039138898,0.00028034352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966801,0.002478887,0.00015099095,0.0003493812,0.00019235657,0.00014830561],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061099734,0.00010641778,0.00024792523,0.000027617043,0.000546352,0.000048125105,0.00037399185,0.000088746114,0.0014205573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014375987,0.00005760242,0.00004900675,0.00016530853,0.0021486992,0.00006983789,0.00005315377,0.00012910704,0.00010833074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057511707,0.00007357607,0.0030386858,0.000035142075,0.000008085561,0.0000011515101,0.0023589958,4.8476954e-7,0.000043504097,0.8442604,0.009189972,0.14041491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092962297,0.000054554817,0.009486329,0.00010393179,0.000013172562,0.0000015838248,0.0003685644,0.0000011907057,0.00010455032,0.14866075,0.8401744,0.00010135874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017136188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010084017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8309844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000564715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021127252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940882295","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2019.1602066","title":"Two steps forward and ten steps backwards: a retreat from shareholder value primacy, stakeholder theory, creditors and directors duties in the Commonwealth Caribbean","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Insolvency; Creditor; Shareholder; Stakeholder; Corporate law; Stakeholder theory; Law; Business; Accounting; Duty; Shareholder primacy; Companies Act; Corporate governance; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Finance; Debt","score_opus":0.0300432189276999,"score_gpt":0.23951787693530635,"score_spread":0.20947465800760645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2940882295","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93965626,0.0034228484,0.0000506368,0.0137031,0.0013960643,0.0013205607,0.00024655607,0.00021100073,0.039992973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98505944,0.00016938038,0.0001836813,0.011477023,0.0026679155,0.000073344396,0.0001077621,0.00007159766,0.00018983311],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99701434,0.00026880665,0.0006829544,0.0007462856,0.00055939844,0.0007281907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976995,0.0006886157,0.0005503794,0.0008051544,0.00018404417,0.00007230113],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017337786,0.00050846295,0.00062111317,0.00013872467,0.0008166864,0.0006251753,0.0006945499,0.00016039773,0.00038792874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019762311,0.0003835353,0.000077321754,0.00045567477,0.0007348433,0.00047191393,0.0005514789,0.0005769452,0.00008958828],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012678725,0.00058261846,0.33258852,0.000824558,0.00017239859,0.00013717214,0.004822106,0.00001361306,0.00003180688,0.3218424,0.3202844,0.01743253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002407973,0.000120281155,0.18765046,0.0004290822,0.00011139514,0.0000078203875,0.0024079797,0.00024965152,0.000029907129,0.0155271655,0.7904084,0.000649944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052239515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022984307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47012395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009042363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006383049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953753403","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2019.1635034","title":"Judicial approaches to combating ‘revenge porn’: a multi-jurisdictional perspective","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Commonwealth; Political science; Perspective (graphical); Phenomenon; Intervention (counseling); Scope (computer science); Articulation (sociology); Action (physics); Sociology; Relevance (law); Criminology; Politics; Psychology; Medicine; Epistemology","score_opus":0.15603459618061966,"score_gpt":0.3447530701291101,"score_spread":0.18871847394849045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953753403","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021143822,0.0007351184,0.0010098667,0.17024422,0.0014722247,0.0012930919,0.000067013534,0.0005129873,0.80352163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97539175,0.000040295065,0.008197588,0.009513671,0.0029756313,0.00008561562,0.000010820057,0.000026451815,0.0037581695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99776274,0.00044659915,0.0002773953,0.00041776217,0.0005022911,0.00059321546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998852,0.00016434152,0.00012840124,0.00023089492,0.0002707908,0.0003535364],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012634565,0.00017922165,0.00024908315,0.000011989578,0.0030170933,0.00010602863,0.0004491837,0.00022839637,0.0013208485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001954627,0.00017438138,0.0001320682,0.0003367204,0.0010417638,0.00006605612,0.00013921114,0.00038184682,0.0008496415],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033315584,0.00018661712,0.00029829415,0.000008021648,0.000026319616,0.0000021194385,0.08798652,0.000003328698,0.000009096241,0.83356136,0.07728411,0.00060087873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004093719,0.00013016607,0.0008651,0.000038892784,0.000015325062,0.0000017123975,0.034404587,0.000022081593,0.000036001173,0.0066750115,0.95715415,0.00024759123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007609969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012613529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95424795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037551642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001906583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016786051","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2020.1753087","title":"Proscription of terrorism in Nigeria: a comparative legal study","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proscription; Terrorism; Political science; Legislature; Law; Politics; Public administration","score_opus":0.07214030047705174,"score_gpt":0.35982537889404015,"score_spread":0.2876850784169884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3016786051","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9654229,0.00015366416,0.00009416156,0.01948262,0.0004107167,0.0011056197,0.000020135003,0.00009451323,0.0132156685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971206,0.00001883224,0.000028908215,0.0023327703,0.00026942696,0.00007187457,0.0000048082406,0.000013401264,0.00013935396],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971224,0.00088256027,0.0006214901,0.00036742922,0.0004774461,0.00052866153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900013,0.00015505159,0.00018971128,0.00023102922,0.00010109363,0.0003230072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074691116,0.00018749069,0.00051245687,0.000050993316,0.00025152703,0.000053199685,0.00047097477,0.00011655189,0.00030393564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001048021,0.0001867745,0.00007309286,0.00030018802,0.00042686763,0.00012331945,0.000094611714,0.00039247653,0.00014512861],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035153455,0.001269319,0.02895758,0.00010354419,0.000026833255,0.000054490713,0.9406717,0.000010090852,0.00012778923,0.018556964,0.0092213815,0.00064879283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016956966,0.0012738928,0.016356768,0.00013628186,0.000020534664,0.0000010488067,0.7088366,0.00007653748,0.00011126922,0.00033295288,0.27075797,0.00040044825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016307008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016007686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2615366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000120312536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014852305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9902435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3017253217","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2020.1751981","title":"An Introduction to English legal history (5th ed)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament","funders":"","keywords":"Magnum opus; Law; Kingdom; History; Classics; Legal history; Political science; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.04091266953165045,"score_gpt":0.3275700307829342,"score_spread":0.2866573612512837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3017253217","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031148953,0.00089100713,0.0003183711,0.50051975,0.003004444,0.00048843655,0.000014270875,0.00037570606,0.46323904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9683391,0.00004539703,0.00038115747,0.021881523,0.007322481,0.000031130356,0.000012605095,0.000011747376,0.0019748746],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986492,0.0002676822,0.0002043389,0.0003038251,0.00032398847,0.00025096556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911565,0.00006859799,0.00006747938,0.00015207492,0.0002840281,0.0003121507],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037663287,0.00010378963,0.00017956701,0.000022860579,0.00047562947,0.000052828032,0.00033134624,0.000039197857,0.002755597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029523313,0.0001097365,0.00004569087,0.00009219407,0.0002072648,0.00012121109,0.00006871261,0.00017163852,0.00053990644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030781484,0.000030311137,0.00007896383,0.0000030638623,0.0000052297173,0.00000100412,0.008234987,0.000012520297,0.000018213806,0.47643355,0.5148807,0.00027069292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001153319,0.00018813026,0.00027419074,0.0000038208905,0.000004455968,1.4044276e-7,0.0017279139,0.000011761214,0.000034187386,0.00009397664,0.9974229,0.00012324135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060447217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045230933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9371901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035157963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010647066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043523640","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2020.1795698","title":"Review of defences to copyright infringement","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Copyright infringement; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.04831794833297958,"score_gpt":0.24879875103774976,"score_spread":0.20048080270477017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043523640","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001596335,0.018118018,0.0003096311,0.16415173,0.00044350955,0.0011240838,0.0000049231758,0.00021786244,0.8140339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5726779,0.0021697592,0.00040767196,0.42353526,0.00084618764,0.00004867099,0.00001984014,0.000032757154,0.00026194713],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863696,0.000021190526,0.0005169925,0.0002855641,0.00026226137,0.00027700095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920106,0.00005219876,0.00019979812,0.00026557865,0.00022582423,0.000055531007],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003771927,0.00017954537,0.00038383238,0.00004875254,0.00014940169,0.000075198084,0.00051435304,0.00003506632,0.020879982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029692816,0.00013453331,0.00009681456,0.00043009297,0.00006833078,0.00013715526,0.00039704068,0.00014395243,0.0049496396],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050406263,0.0000389765,0.00008272803,0.0057808324,0.000010387539,0.0000018408209,0.00005597884,0.0000013367237,0.000041829713,0.01435786,0.97689223,0.0026856093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001639805,0.00006205108,0.0000428168,0.0020424186,0.00002578654,2.3340577e-7,0.000024135383,0.0002883536,0.00020037207,0.00020363307,0.996767,0.00017926001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00084713794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006798968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81377196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018174627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018411665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195243318","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2021.1953742","title":"Anatomy of an election – Canada’s Federal General Election of 2019 through the lens of political law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federal election; Law; Politics; Political science; Election law; Democracy","score_opus":0.02199072710997826,"score_gpt":0.31044438128734436,"score_spread":0.2884536541773661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195243318","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30479077,0.0010245626,0.00008147667,0.07890421,0.0007099965,0.00030610175,0.00008113146,0.000029409632,0.6140724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975252,0.00008721887,0.000109736335,0.001886762,0.0002099585,0.000004919318,0.00001184156,0.0000042898773,0.00016005122],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852,0.00033956335,0.00031384727,0.0001353315,0.00039420513,0.00029704356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917865,0.00013512895,0.00014349219,0.0001265971,0.000357255,0.000058874135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027490902,0.000078494544,0.00023425,0.000009552105,0.00079725607,0.000010716647,0.00013691011,0.00006255679,0.00014092369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006946768,0.00006565542,0.000061128056,0.00017928919,0.0008672831,0.0000478538,0.00004173959,0.00012887512,0.0000015068737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022260454,0.00007348448,0.0004893944,0.000011332493,0.00002335802,0.0000010306059,0.00032484045,0.000010060092,0.00013806869,0.9942557,0.0045367456,0.00011371852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032974986,0.0001484714,0.009287554,0.000034071993,0.000034793367,0.000005379296,0.0029970729,0.000008119118,0.007966733,0.04031726,0.93872094,0.00014985532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98839253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98641914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9539384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016124001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001311885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.613193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232701384","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2014.937068","title":"Report of the Commonwealth Working Group of Experts on Cybercrime","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Cybercrime; Political science; Law; Law enforcement; Public administration; The Internet","score_opus":0.024125601566711553,"score_gpt":0.2560168851966746,"score_spread":0.23189128362996303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232701384","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11227173,0.0010942739,0.020409437,0.029513622,0.0027738328,0.0014445488,0.0000072849557,0.00037291885,0.8321124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933509,0.000037576814,0.0018385235,0.004156081,0.00009515084,0.000026298823,0.000003603849,0.000019391318,0.0004724488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971947,0.00036021986,0.000943086,0.00043086056,0.00061802345,0.0004531052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967452,0.0005480532,0.00057369407,0.001915561,0.00010376665,0.00011369202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013824056,0.00025057892,0.0005501262,0.00006129502,0.0004292669,0.000031960186,0.0015169014,0.00008551353,0.000040264782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012022691,0.00017956141,0.00020277959,0.00030541077,0.00029285825,0.000050617848,0.00087181595,0.00024509,0.000021710863],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027134229,0.00022064376,0.0034274883,0.00008057622,0.000031878728,0.000006822199,0.00076937035,0.000034737746,0.00011394481,0.957572,0.030561047,0.0071543963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006675473,0.00037174975,0.010349035,0.0003982307,0.000016655864,0.00003111601,0.00008242703,0.0001296476,0.0032036358,0.0024176082,0.9820552,0.00027717408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004407251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00084071734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95515436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005936843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040008137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7322301},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232703879","doi":"10.1080/03050710701594746","title":"Book Reviews","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03146703545260693,"score_gpt":0.31403694452634434,"score_spread":0.2825699090737374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232703879","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011203535,0.17575257,0.00065682956,0.0131422235,0.00066601794,0.0018363477,0.000036030928,0.0010056223,0.805784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20033059,0.009750526,0.021219423,0.6572536,0.0033635406,0.0004080199,0.00032494395,0.0013176085,0.10603172],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968915,0.0003291403,0.00094121404,0.0004478356,0.00037731588,0.0010129702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976825,0.00028225002,0.00036141343,0.0010866565,0.000085798274,0.00050134223],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00475732,0.0003166342,0.00055691117,0.00009436,0.00035385726,0.000045331093,0.00057263277,0.00013801103,0.010722093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018838124,0.00029553313,0.0001672749,0.00029513254,0.00024313723,0.000057556208,0.00017159697,0.0004950575,0.14729989],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007522654,0.00010482952,0.00017433151,0.00007352296,0.0000065245777,0.00003288241,0.00008350684,6.825342e-7,0.0001943492,0.033583436,0.9622917,0.0033790118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055021164,0.000075310054,0.00064342626,0.00011482292,0.00001569096,0.000028231363,0.000015317115,0.0000024589715,0.00056823366,0.00015815509,0.9975186,0.00030951475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044625383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000527135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6997523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023611849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003540249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237002303","doi":"10.1080/03050710600907114","title":"HJ Heinz Co of Canada Ltd v Canada (Attorney General)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.008003946763719844,"score_gpt":0.24502027256490552,"score_spread":0.23701632580118567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237002303","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06564301,0.0013024467,0.0000072349494,0.10988575,0.0008677519,0.00030882636,0.00017383271,0.000036537152,0.8217746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.979184,0.000033928354,0.00011957469,0.0038175469,0.0004918028,0.000010550423,0.000025150413,0.000011823216,0.016305668],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834937,0.00016253522,0.00032829872,0.00016803999,0.00052523904,0.00046652587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915594,0.00015547188,0.00014617771,0.00021166513,0.00015421932,0.00017654378],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030587925,0.000114143826,0.00023138085,0.0000138184005,0.0013036871,0.000019714598,0.00022085274,0.000047410365,0.0006264053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039242783,0.00010682306,0.00004203245,0.00014811876,0.0002761915,0.000016920621,0.000043649372,0.00011897599,0.0000043573164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000405044,0.00001626242,0.0013592355,0.000014602199,0.00000807808,0.000012048296,0.00016004074,0.00011636379,0.000003842525,0.22705194,0.77119225,0.00006125852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015521057,0.000010948267,0.0045748428,0.000011141264,0.000005885546,7.99072e-7,0.00048414426,0.0000064818964,0.00006021479,0.00019236567,0.9943741,0.00012387987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99995714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91354096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060146005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033704487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239951440","doi":"10.1080/03050710601179150","title":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.030102616585432868,"score_gpt":0.3454846624718732,"score_spread":0.31538204588644037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239951440","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016161415,0.0002828461,0.000068591595,0.3971652,0.00078400405,0.00037181168,0.000019781302,0.00027033308,0.59942126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9213623,0.00009409189,0.00245158,0.051776234,0.0013952107,0.00009857944,0.000113627146,0.000048967988,0.02265944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99629956,0.0009825652,0.0007524724,0.00042943747,0.0006679016,0.0008680621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972427,0.000980881,0.00043148085,0.00061667035,0.00038241342,0.00034588098],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024436163,0.00025639505,0.00034119445,0.0000909547,0.0031239192,0.00050715933,0.0006725933,0.00024341246,0.010837107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029938418,0.00027652702,0.00011177005,0.0005863715,0.00086833944,0.000187603,0.00009722663,0.0009422291,0.005188651],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014075394,0.00019436792,0.00024445585,0.000013832017,0.0000048939473,0.0000033035044,0.00079271797,0.00000505744,0.000003651447,0.5926698,0.4056665,0.00038736014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041367684,0.000045181543,0.00058658555,0.00002887878,0.000015437938,0.0000044252524,0.001289985,0.0000027756714,0.00002869598,0.009392788,0.9878863,0.0003052741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3409579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07759669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9197461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032632568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059753313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243102261","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2011.621655","title":"Canada: constitutional law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.03408508762595927,"score_gpt":0.28492890095226964,"score_spread":0.25084381332631034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243102261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010866717,0.0015821699,0.000053604446,0.0441848,0.0011322233,0.00015000724,0.000041930616,0.00006026552,0.9517083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97913873,0.000068170826,0.00011033808,0.019249354,0.0009475618,0.000021255062,0.0000090220565,0.0000034821926,0.00045208205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985303,0.0001426289,0.0001888911,0.000119471086,0.00045647132,0.00056220323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992283,0.0002053271,0.000060025384,0.0000987479,0.0000979062,0.00030968545],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005358274,0.0001005697,0.00015791849,0.000009909933,0.0025072845,0.000025118345,0.0001868073,0.000058350586,0.0017360002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008475449,0.00009760523,0.000039862643,0.00009347023,0.0029866393,0.000063424035,0.00006905442,0.00014582754,0.0003351113],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005486696,0.000035674166,0.0022522272,0.0000024702422,0.000010472391,0.0000025503664,0.00018608043,0.0000012620327,6.388227e-7,0.90939784,0.0879663,0.00013897236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011258228,0.000005289275,0.0013331734,0.000010097645,0.000007754777,0.0000022786207,0.00039166055,1.2958121e-7,0.0000070764736,0.0060122954,0.991994,0.00012364653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98329884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9736956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9780521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003518316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013037749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246580623","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2005.9986711","title":"British Columbia law institute report on leases of unsubdivided land and the<i>top line</i>case","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Line (geometry); Common law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.023436442749723507,"score_gpt":0.29233966792657323,"score_spread":0.2689032251768497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246580623","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54159325,0.0007023127,0.000009503898,0.018600065,0.00025262687,0.00042656838,0.00003152498,0.000072053364,0.43831208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98185945,0.0002504842,0.000115076866,0.010759745,0.0003937321,0.000009286075,0.000013217979,0.000012265842,0.006586733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850637,0.00032967379,0.00040999852,0.0002112402,0.00032177352,0.0002209439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885136,0.00040421207,0.00022792516,0.00022986485,0.00014818483,0.0001384274],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013121825,0.00008086775,0.00022691864,0.0000114265495,0.00065890217,0.0003181276,0.00022061744,0.000056770903,0.00093121914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000347275,0.00008988453,0.00006672616,0.000067537556,0.0013755022,0.00009670837,0.000060680122,0.00019300771,0.000044416756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009110634,0.00014883396,0.0029386932,0.000018589557,0.000024410108,0.000765331,0.00025491347,0.000016934162,9.878223e-7,0.9677067,0.025652658,0.0023808735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011342008,0.000045533096,0.001175326,0.00007967475,0.000014389214,0.00016957166,0.000035251756,0.000010843264,0.000006008597,0.0008006004,0.9964289,0.000099672776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25602275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49363825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97077626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003619943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059985185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256726705","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2005.9986672","title":"Law reform commission of nova Scotia final report privity of contract (third party rights)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Privity of contract; Law; Commission; Political science; Business; Exclusion clause; Contract management; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04649608744291367,"score_gpt":0.3424570061971877,"score_spread":0.29596091875427405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256726705","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12416568,0.00015307276,0.0001077216,0.038303066,0.0001344819,0.00059336575,0.000043630273,0.00007728003,0.8364217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962315,0.00001767936,0.0015327657,0.00067383534,0.00018675259,0.000008725019,0.000018398063,0.000009348237,0.0013210253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980604,0.0001767647,0.00073743425,0.000238796,0.00044565464,0.0003409239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982261,0.00018559847,0.00059535337,0.00056451024,0.00020928832,0.00021913271],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016598878,0.0001287018,0.0003610664,0.00002271808,0.0005488383,0.000024381958,0.00043371913,0.00014663585,0.0009899896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006612946,0.00010721508,0.00011659881,0.00015590843,0.00073933945,0.00011060883,0.00011236034,0.00027726585,0.00013018001],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003737297,0.0003460806,0.00096279324,0.000038555892,0.000009566833,0.0000046210957,0.0006859698,0.000008437037,0.00014245424,0.99073416,0.00628843,0.0007415856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034958613,0.00004611092,0.0028792585,0.000060988303,0.000014593652,0.000005379216,0.000075564254,0.000015684318,0.0019841266,0.0016462624,0.9928033,0.00011919452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2132852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13728788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9890879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016899961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016665997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}