{"meta":{"query_hash":"ecd61003508b","filters":{"venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin"},"cohort_total":25,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":25,"exported":25,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ecd61003508b","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Commonwealth+Law+Bulletin"},"results":[{"id":"W1972015922","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2012.694998","title":"International practice of Public Legal Education: a missing element in the justice system of Bangladesh","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Empowerment; Transformative learning; Relevance (law); Economic Justice; Element (criminal law); Public relations; Subject (documents); Political science; Process (computing); Order (exchange); Sociology; Public administration; Engineering ethics; Law; Business; Engineering; Computer science; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.06442253769063168,"score_gpt":0.4049741958835994,"score_spread":0.34055165819296773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972015922","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26168844,0.008490079,0.0059905117,0.123499244,0.00031141692,0.0003065089,0.00011194972,0.00007116194,0.59953076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97057277,0.0031290527,0.0017752949,0.0023207143,0.000043872136,0.0000811096,0.00002964865,0.000015836911,0.022031728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99373406,0.0035993368,0.00039272476,0.00046977503,0.0009614635,0.00084264704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99395,0.0026680152,0.0008937298,0.0006043298,0.00064009405,0.0012438226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051764264,0.00021890082,0.0002530169,0.0011031296,0.0074394164,0.008294504,0.00092239724,0.0021893303,0.0073512313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009255229,0.00023550828,0.00010518957,0.0030499455,0.014385168,0.0037825815,0.006080665,0.003077597,0.0006357263],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021604532,0.00013891248,0.011428636,0.0004113714,0.00000821325,0.0013950933,0.17122686,0.00025053276,0.001275514,0.6765989,0.009899828,0.12734449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019565725,0.00016173406,0.024265729,0.0012774108,0.0000141696955,0.0013439584,0.26874045,0.00043832712,0.0006989051,0.056798544,0.6461616,0.000079640675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019265879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037006557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019265879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011298701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020464625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0819782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014237474","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2011.595151","title":"Custom as a source of law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04170517480488936,"score_gpt":0.2968302301115839,"score_spread":0.2551250553066945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014237474","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017795165,0.7230857,0.0009397814,0.11189234,0.007944988,0.000024275969,0.0003696213,0.000099640965,0.15386415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08561381,0.34031218,0.0014073798,0.024815133,0.0049807206,0.00008440744,0.0004536044,0.00023211061,0.54210067],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920255,0.00024079547,0.000045011646,0.00017259696,0.00022904274,0.00010997622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993799,0.0002582595,0.00010470713,0.00008468176,0.000086767264,0.00008572876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011555485,0.00090336805,0.00046298123,0.001588625,0.0032129805,0.0070412094,0.0009142447,0.0027472838,0.023979459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003236037,0.00061120605,0.0004181835,0.002219452,0.0062440666,0.009764682,0.0031146368,0.004362229,0.0065196566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001831326,0.000014483929,0.0002952734,0.00028143468,0.000009647116,0.00008250014,0.003060754,0.000107533066,0.00010877004,0.13355765,0.7975657,0.06489789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030363892,0.000005893856,0.0007793316,0.00072235975,0.0000033963292,0.00012773981,0.0013647592,0.00004179946,0.00005772144,0.023434168,0.9734501,0.000009635132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023175934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04873429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023979459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044073253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004085896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08021927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016150660","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2012.748258","title":"Private international law and the Internet, 2nd edn","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Law; Political science; Conflict of laws; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.01425567974650163,"score_gpt":0.27534418013345546,"score_spread":0.26108850038695386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016150660","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001161923,0.71394414,0.0010714268,0.025010955,0.0041679624,0.00002132375,0.00033459952,0.00014625532,0.25414136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.048420656,0.4404924,0.0013942363,0.009613035,0.0068260925,0.00012107149,0.0005787517,0.00033141745,0.49222243],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925035,0.0001915539,0.000049232003,0.000097113596,0.0003047051,0.000107041255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936897,0.00025153952,0.000109550456,0.0000837409,0.000109580644,0.000076600874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008509,0.0009787752,0.0005769031,0.0024509216,0.0021667855,0.010470564,0.00083364727,0.0031680218,0.0390545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002742993,0.0008313163,0.0004127739,0.0036986824,0.0039650034,0.010311808,0.00229986,0.0027536782,0.012310524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002208019,0.00003419527,0.0002596565,0.0003768503,0.000009304536,0.00011347652,0.0015906419,0.00018948133,0.00013371414,0.15211897,0.7270898,0.11806182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043990617,0.000005326344,0.00054078386,0.000837703,0.0000034775624,0.00012892642,0.00075978506,0.0000777492,0.000039434235,0.027101688,0.9704936,0.0000071633126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010865198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026556604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0390545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004171934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030511909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13065034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017292580","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2010.500831","title":"Supreme Court of Canada – structure, status and challenges","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Original jurisdiction; Mandate; Jurisdiction; Remand (court procedure); Political science; Judicial independence; Administrative law; Court of record; Certiorari","score_opus":0.026019683573685455,"score_gpt":0.262253881313707,"score_spread":0.23623419774002158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017292580","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055001874,0.0278693,0.0025816057,0.5710638,0.0019172985,0.00023805717,0.0012615027,0.00019866883,0.33986792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8139404,0.02013117,0.0053291135,0.06983061,0.0018718259,0.000175642,0.00092641386,0.00016220481,0.087632686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9778496,0.0023108772,0.0005450244,0.0020786107,0.00992011,0.0072957575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9570775,0.0056980285,0.0013758701,0.0011016749,0.021192288,0.013554782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0148763275,0.0004938024,0.00085973623,0.005801861,0.034261934,0.028130397,0.0072247703,0.008213033,0.011410096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030474653,0.0010019329,0.0006026174,0.008706967,0.01664685,0.0060564224,0.00568107,0.010451179,0.0009045545],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023486133,0.00005050765,0.0039561368,0.0001044966,0.000017529293,0.00021340698,0.0028802636,0.00046141606,0.00014071255,0.847244,0.09991927,0.044988755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007330411,0.00005813988,0.032749735,0.0012715176,0.000057929126,0.00020122646,0.013696781,0.002438755,0.0003174834,0.123096,0.8258004,0.00023864122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.988736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99305385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22012119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22012119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.43386716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9045489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035219757","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2011.548139","title":"Residential real estate brokerage services under attack in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Real estate; Commission; Listing (finance); Commonwealth; Competition (biology); Business; Tribunal; Service (business); Estate; Finance; Law; Accounting; Political science; Marketing","score_opus":0.04519890385538514,"score_gpt":0.235182911203393,"score_spread":0.18998400734800786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035219757","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.086057186,0.012733182,0.00036440772,0.2993761,0.0046845777,0.00032909453,0.0019582429,0.00051977247,0.59397745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29758292,0.009302106,0.0007698721,0.06651539,0.0009884444,0.00007060483,0.0012288861,0.00018155706,0.62336016],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99213046,0.0001692404,0.00014159418,0.00034964076,0.0036051169,0.0036039276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99053127,0.00051390205,0.0003243422,0.0001601692,0.003856141,0.004614118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001830826,0.00048630012,0.00040412726,0.0018484013,0.024593899,0.012278998,0.0018940325,0.0070544635,0.0287868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047368906,0.00080329436,0.000459309,0.0039133234,0.003001823,0.0019512585,0.0022958925,0.0057867365,0.002660237],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004930854,0.00007860583,0.0082399035,0.00012741743,0.000019513112,0.0021200222,0.00208236,0.00025333217,0.0007884564,0.048644856,0.90781605,0.029780157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028132017,0.000025681857,0.029105056,0.00012956535,0.000025196607,0.00027255167,0.005831848,0.00044001598,0.0003488553,0.0012883868,0.9624368,0.00006800983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99388075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10292871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10292871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29691443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7468036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038699022","doi":"10.1080/03050710903573472","title":"Keeping the statute book up to date: a personal view","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Legislation; Statutory law; Law; Political science; Principal (computer security); State (computer science); Statute of limitations; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.04471371080242119,"score_gpt":0.36350627293524973,"score_spread":0.3187925621328285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038699022","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008270241,0.041925814,0.005531786,0.43031314,0.013601534,0.000025086525,0.00015001916,0.00044950758,0.49973288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.166239,0.07333986,0.0062441244,0.09282373,0.013696026,0.00004066463,0.00019922762,0.0006329104,0.6467846],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759835,0.00078705157,0.00013756158,0.00021865152,0.0010589155,0.00019943411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947684,0.0020082917,0.0002637416,0.0004250487,0.0019016706,0.0006329077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032108708,0.00021743224,0.00025060648,0.001244519,0.005144541,0.011131567,0.00086425734,0.0031805388,0.015061944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008267195,0.00027428335,0.00018758142,0.0023519716,0.0071261465,0.0119698355,0.0020610765,0.005398465,0.0041468283],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001178299,0.00004270482,0.00095944107,0.00013599562,0.000004503949,0.0003744307,0.016678678,0.00018473405,0.0005191074,0.11735057,0.7473576,0.11638053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.5985092e-7,0.000005723808,0.00018623413,0.00007793579,0.0000013876657,0.00008413633,0.0019237578,0.000027477892,0.000064294174,0.0014754506,0.9961479,0.000005334636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022451699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052090343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022451699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004727225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069333273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050387204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062193801","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2005.9986684","title":"The introduction of the Caribbean court of justice and the likely impact on human rights standards in the Caribbean commonwealth","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"World Federation of Science Journalists","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Law; Political science; Human rights; Economic Justice; Caribbean region; Latin Americans","score_opus":0.020487581469675917,"score_gpt":0.28968576584953515,"score_spread":0.2691981843798592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062193801","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015454471,0.09444091,0.0011074602,0.5220777,0.005408001,0.000189437,0.0011511516,0.0000734492,0.3600975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31755587,0.04813816,0.0028296954,0.36729085,0.0040747067,0.0005271109,0.00067154644,0.00018111595,0.25873092],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880911,0.0022779708,0.00058880897,0.0008705684,0.004479253,0.003692265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98246264,0.0065996563,0.0010217088,0.00040132107,0.00715915,0.002355532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009000213,0.0006611509,0.00081940525,0.0036370046,0.022145309,0.016958937,0.002850003,0.027355853,0.016862841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033700354,0.0010225012,0.0010294282,0.004569869,0.0062674577,0.0064761024,0.0068786484,0.020464314,0.0013556457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003440911,0.000031006275,0.0016673693,0.00012812352,0.00001655061,0.0010281439,0.0042949435,0.0001899419,0.000273776,0.43117866,0.5371863,0.023970783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041607887,0.000035222118,0.010499385,0.0014193242,0.00006197701,0.00025481262,0.0042150533,0.00026829826,0.00034374732,0.029738287,0.952923,0.00019935478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7346191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8569311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7346191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04518348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06500183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53388757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063086196","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2010.481400","title":"Must terrorists act for a cause? The motivational requirement in definitions of terrorism in the United Kingdom, Canada, New Zealand and Australia","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Commonwealth; Law; Ideology; Kingdom; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.12244266725346552,"score_gpt":0.3591118586053519,"score_spread":0.23666919135188635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063086196","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19689107,0.010374778,0.025196819,0.33595985,0.0017176837,0.00016099655,0.00011827832,0.00004504095,0.42953554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841809,0.0010655245,0.0019480016,0.00619784,0.0002409063,0.00007384725,0.000025907399,0.000013474194,0.006253689],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931846,0.0038297721,0.00040116592,0.000451817,0.0011614022,0.00097136985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99594766,0.0017263371,0.0008881969,0.00028691508,0.0006714697,0.0004794487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005633921,0.00029724912,0.00027261558,0.001024793,0.004968191,0.004610885,0.00095031795,0.0049829716,0.0013888287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009695273,0.000314378,0.00043007388,0.0006591819,0.025684219,0.003624763,0.0027495057,0.0041946983,0.000293574],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007960109,0.000005772096,0.0012260085,0.000022724797,0.0000027311332,0.000060447997,0.005892543,0.00006547454,0.00007903734,0.98837227,0.0019079736,0.0023570857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003287079,0.00006154205,0.030810347,0.00065337686,0.000024123297,0.00066417706,0.02589872,0.0011476803,0.00046310728,0.7132172,0.22691418,0.00011267135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042883024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060180824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95711696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061033443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00732885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08526689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073883360","doi":"10.1080/03050710701747328","title":"Change of Political Allegiance in Parliamentary Life","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament","funders":"","keywords":"Allegiance; Parliament; House of Commons; Politics; Law; Constitution; Political science; Conscience; Parliamentary sovereignty; Sociology","score_opus":0.0683611379097948,"score_gpt":0.3400177201564915,"score_spread":0.2716565822466967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073883360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59512264,0.0014073377,0.0009665962,0.011558997,0.00020023229,0.000038529382,0.000113411355,0.000021027525,0.3905713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99088496,0.00019628632,0.00012878801,0.00072122476,0.0000316965,0.000008264554,0.000019351215,0.000007686253,0.008001909],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9833528,0.005054451,0.0005437754,0.0012806287,0.005177696,0.004590681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988794,0.0037786735,0.002001208,0.0006716396,0.0033757747,0.0013786518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006415683,0.00013243199,0.00037101476,0.002261367,0.021343593,0.010827224,0.0010926125,0.0025979422,0.0035239493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02817819,0.00034278425,0.00025461407,0.0028178885,0.0301599,0.0034976688,0.004555545,0.004773754,0.00055024907],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000093823815,0.00019523555,0.029667294,0.000072718445,0.000025196698,0.0004926816,0.35214612,0.00035079985,0.0018122697,0.5513894,0.0070750047,0.056679476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034002253,0.0002218503,0.3611488,0.00030584232,0.00003963327,0.0005150098,0.18652728,0.00039887227,0.002193873,0.057826698,0.39058658,0.00020150963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40989566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6270737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40989566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04113797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023848385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8150196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089150328","doi":"10.1080/03050710902726931","title":"Provincial law reform agencies in Canada: are they really that different from the Scottish Law Commission?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Law; Mandate; Political science; Law reform; Work (physics); Agency (philosophy); Public administration; State (computer science); Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.04327491989774831,"score_gpt":0.31085825604174966,"score_spread":0.26758333614400137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089150328","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09294433,0.02311497,0.0018252847,0.6575386,0.0020198512,0.000120465345,0.0005831674,0.0001477141,0.22170568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85689,0.012133434,0.0025074158,0.06030087,0.00040425826,0.00005726568,0.0003235974,0.00008667559,0.06729645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.984909,0.0013340566,0.000193446,0.0007223426,0.005699954,0.007141157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985844,0.0012911322,0.0008807629,0.00030166327,0.0044753044,0.007207173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042161103,0.00026056526,0.00044022547,0.0020590043,0.029002678,0.014818215,0.0018793028,0.004414135,0.0060312664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017241146,0.00048198798,0.00043526714,0.005421688,0.0137832705,0.0045085405,0.004396542,0.0054992195,0.00051098823],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008203022,0.00006968164,0.029739426,0.00034568238,0.000051699066,0.00079151674,0.04091221,0.0006109171,0.00043494,0.51384246,0.3053543,0.10776506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036785725,0.000033492954,0.04310127,0.00052806135,0.00004657812,0.00018473057,0.047140162,0.0005278362,0.0002599235,0.0146551635,0.8933585,0.00012741481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9964456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76876265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23123734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4750928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89165574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095019064","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2002.9986631","title":"Improving legislative drafting capacity","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Legislation; Law; Principal (computer security); Political science; Legislative assembly; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.038789550395226136,"score_gpt":0.27908085905250163,"score_spread":0.2402913086572755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095019064","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047802,0.003393765,0.11961215,0.13566227,0.005205984,0.004124215,0.0017990705,0.02924745,0.65315306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38743725,0.004353402,0.17284115,0.021238573,0.006236158,0.0043343673,0.0049123596,0.008269796,0.39037687],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9339767,0.028279414,0.0052321088,0.008099506,0.016288064,0.008124174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.53819686,0.20512676,0.020412354,0.097842135,0.1092064,0.02921555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08707437,0.0012636936,0.0014980428,0.012958085,0.011463911,0.019024007,0.004847873,0.004932309,0.2522977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32637605,0.0028490736,0.001630222,0.00738215,0.0059675514,0.025278399,0.012581376,0.0064065857,0.09978124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020618572,0.0005928552,0.005669051,0.0005547879,0.00004328353,0.00040950804,0.0088725025,0.0031058413,0.0034820682,0.07077239,0.46866947,0.43762195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025317547,0.00019743499,0.0079049915,0.00075604854,0.000056578803,0.00025816623,0.00437961,0.0050158133,0.0023183564,0.0192979,0.95941395,0.00014797185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019434186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025653591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2522977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010220032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03319328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8440199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2549189372","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2016.1259077","title":"Aboriginal oral testimony, hearsay rule and the reception theory of admissibility","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Law; Admissible evidence; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.033796973113345584,"score_gpt":0.3644389456552977,"score_spread":0.33064197254195216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2549189372","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20504348,0.0053921524,0.071841754,0.0358184,0.0006537329,0.00022194943,0.00013206145,0.00005365913,0.6808427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97580725,0.0010760695,0.006231862,0.0007134049,0.00018920591,0.000044798402,0.00003574707,0.000014645168,0.01588705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98944306,0.0053722784,0.00066637824,0.0012041151,0.0024865223,0.00082756556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9720914,0.020604294,0.0021573717,0.0017565773,0.0027008858,0.0006895483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015516287,0.00038576708,0.0006559773,0.0021852239,0.00494631,0.010008179,0.0022886568,0.0042217034,0.007399598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043014083,0.00055517926,0.00051498757,0.00092904276,0.027796976,0.0069883023,0.0047824658,0.004155034,0.0008616676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034474775,0.000028925933,0.0009692741,0.00016083034,0.000026312207,0.00063784095,0.022896525,0.00075141626,0.00035003302,0.95777816,0.0013917624,0.014974526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003661142,0.00007617758,0.002281372,0.00044701528,0.00006786763,0.0003305137,0.016232917,0.0018447957,0.00085478096,0.9459999,0.03178118,0.000046758265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020419009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019127892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020419009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004455921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006282726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08205891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940882295","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2019.1602066","title":"Two steps forward and ten steps backwards: a retreat from shareholder value primacy, stakeholder theory, creditors and directors duties in the Commonwealth Caribbean","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Insolvency; Creditor; Shareholder; Stakeholder; Corporate law; Stakeholder theory; Law; Business; Accounting; Duty; Shareholder primacy; Companies Act; Corporate governance; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Finance; Debt","score_opus":0.0300432189276999,"score_gpt":0.23951787693530635,"score_spread":0.20947465800760645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2940882295","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07822488,0.06926864,0.011698096,0.6750347,0.0020198883,0.000066083274,0.000086156295,0.00003341931,0.16356808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89204764,0.036006413,0.008424978,0.033421703,0.0015360035,0.00009740702,0.000056613804,0.00008011758,0.02832917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99723864,0.0015563021,0.00007591077,0.00021649068,0.0005936842,0.00031886352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99173564,0.005945906,0.00036139708,0.00037032922,0.00095864275,0.00062806706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006482564,0.0005130055,0.00078151654,0.002965515,0.0073554534,0.010474298,0.001965781,0.0057609514,0.0049657803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006264055,0.000394623,0.00049824396,0.0027170016,0.043066572,0.02213415,0.0061610215,0.0126657905,0.00047893668],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014473846,0.000039017195,0.0007930212,0.0000804864,0.0000064235755,0.00022612227,0.015964115,0.00011306798,0.00008684945,0.9609685,0.0058068633,0.015900992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000186971,0.000036019705,0.0028680903,0.0013897095,0.000014402738,0.0002142136,0.051525533,0.00092691445,0.0002384874,0.77543837,0.16727853,0.000051046994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10902184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19581887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10902184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014199253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01583896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21677452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953753403","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2019.1635034","title":"Judicial approaches to combating ‘revenge porn’: a multi-jurisdictional perspective","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Commonwealth; Political science; Perspective (graphical); Phenomenon; Intervention (counseling); Scope (computer science); Articulation (sociology); Action (physics); Sociology; Relevance (law); Criminology; Politics; Psychology; Medicine; Epistemology","score_opus":0.15603459618061966,"score_gpt":0.3447530701291101,"score_spread":0.18871847394849045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953753403","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.100746766,0.03834439,0.097908005,0.32388535,0.0016250776,0.00027838637,0.000039796865,0.00010996212,0.4370623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9535658,0.006577595,0.009829961,0.021950312,0.0006650758,0.00016651284,0.0000114389195,0.000029833987,0.0072033885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.951783,0.027108703,0.0019852442,0.003726887,0.00843775,0.0069583734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9520721,0.03448281,0.0037455412,0.0026497375,0.0049966155,0.0020531518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05217251,0.00066651014,0.0012244269,0.005412134,0.02296404,0.02319054,0.0070923343,0.0235545,0.0030767047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042786736,0.0010887791,0.0015266052,0.0030517,0.067456886,0.016511552,0.018269299,0.020041237,0.00030183574],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032806106,0.00002102092,0.0003501999,0.000066360306,0.000016232683,0.00047649787,0.011923193,0.00034718378,0.00014954928,0.98138857,0.0007656838,0.0044921767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003140855,0.00019866572,0.0024629955,0.0021666659,0.00016592556,0.0021904693,0.063460425,0.0028981406,0.0010868841,0.7661205,0.15904842,0.00016958393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014048468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021554718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05217251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012133045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023881344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2759179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016786051","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2020.1753087","title":"Proscription of terrorism in Nigeria: a comparative legal study","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proscription; Terrorism; Political science; Legislature; Law; Politics; Public administration","score_opus":0.07214030047705174,"score_gpt":0.35982537889404015,"score_spread":0.2876850784169884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3016786051","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9844291,0.0017376153,0.000097466225,0.00036939382,0.000024936735,0.000027103906,0.000031901654,6.8517676e-7,0.013281885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99520063,0.0029636924,0.00009877222,0.0001235733,0.000017870274,0.000025977526,0.00004193866,0.0000021617045,0.0015253397],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990792,0.0005159255,0.000067313566,0.000055499466,0.00013052921,0.00015154743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99632686,0.0022108953,0.000786402,0.000096852375,0.0003814378,0.00019748292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019478527,0.00017267575,0.00028934097,0.0030050927,0.005052727,0.0024341631,0.00032855952,0.0007148471,0.0064188144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00512457,0.00022712996,0.00018033656,0.0036085376,0.0034063482,0.0030196817,0.0016123158,0.0010754946,0.00033266676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032667822,0.0015555343,0.20479421,0.00087095494,0.000036981408,0.003917407,0.6827608,0.000059399998,0.00096857577,0.037121393,0.001853784,0.06573432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000086055625,0.00023397732,0.14593334,0.0006440535,0.000025342822,0.0011426861,0.83621484,0.00006489866,0.00017651735,0.0007663566,0.014774932,0.0000144526775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014720477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05474933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014720477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003685359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017322272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029269576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3017253217","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2020.1751981","title":"An Introduction to English legal history (5th ed)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament","funders":"","keywords":"Magnum opus; Law; Kingdom; History; Classics; Legal history; Political science; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.04091266953165045,"score_gpt":0.3275700307829342,"score_spread":0.2866573612512837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3017253217","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007211441,0.5669454,0.0029456327,0.03407326,0.031718913,0.0000735663,0.0011754091,0.00036735722,0.3619794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008713506,0.23022601,0.0023075868,0.0140216565,0.01693677,0.00011531807,0.0010675034,0.00034170042,0.72627],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995795,0.00009949116,0.000037369435,0.000040030423,0.0001963707,0.000047144877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992009,0.0003223571,0.00006500651,0.000053451437,0.00025762588,0.000100670906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007387495,0.0008166155,0.0006018213,0.0035665873,0.0012919417,0.0034300897,0.00076006516,0.0012754992,0.13042015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022157645,0.00045535018,0.00036408487,0.0029700934,0.0011206719,0.004440512,0.001863927,0.0015730627,0.06312116],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008874206,0.000015365515,0.00010523422,0.00030546339,0.0000021091519,0.000075666634,0.00043348057,0.00003947657,0.00011838923,0.02150854,0.87814707,0.09924031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.7481207e-7,0.000004763894,0.00020573885,0.00036588663,6.5970255e-7,0.000069528534,0.00012297853,0.0000117300315,0.000013154011,0.002545018,0.9966574,0.0000022967981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042403364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011213743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13042015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015465735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017462581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43629885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043523640","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2020.1795698","title":"Review of defences to copyright infringement","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Copyright infringement; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.04831794833297958,"score_gpt":0.24879875103774976,"score_spread":0.20048080270477017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043523640","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012556522,0.9946148,0.00008463746,0.001736832,0.0005176986,0.0000071675586,0.00003710533,0.0000033262509,0.0028728698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017300661,0.9952982,0.00011567018,0.0014430814,0.0006535552,0.000012689565,0.000072518174,0.0000036580743,0.00067061634],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783033,0.0005266292,0.00035651296,0.0002378356,0.00090076873,0.00014787503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9774064,0.014777132,0.002253007,0.0004282424,0.004681228,0.00045405474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005073077,0.00070907787,0.0014952453,0.009382165,0.0007830719,0.002518718,0.0015790339,0.0027629382,0.007508378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020515032,0.0005291833,0.00079654885,0.010305022,0.002419058,0.0033234071,0.0012466118,0.0023510845,0.0024326409],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011734827,0.000059561273,0.0004024124,0.041476816,0.00016292225,0.0001569419,0.00027273805,0.0002827984,0.00038962328,0.025879826,0.1414046,0.7893945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001588044,0.000055977896,0.0014312482,0.01745236,0.00008713659,0.00020356335,0.00013872166,0.000027255961,0.00014167777,0.0020149457,0.9784167,0.000014630738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054858085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00798026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009382165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029338552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007109456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026829302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195243318","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2021.1953742","title":"Anatomy of an election – Canada’s Federal General Election of 2019 through the lens of political law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federal election; Law; Politics; Political science; Election law; Democracy","score_opus":0.02199072710997826,"score_gpt":0.31044438128734436,"score_spread":0.2884536541773661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195243318","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007081145,0.0034198416,0.0019027578,0.032344066,0.0008494274,0.000037981736,0.00043316477,0.00007379816,0.9538579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.548822,0.0042569484,0.0026250572,0.009747617,0.0005360719,0.000057924426,0.00034578773,0.00020518353,0.43340337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984303,0.00030298045,0.000017086077,0.0001301873,0.00050181843,0.000617594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991666,0.00016023745,0.000030615764,0.0000334282,0.00035950614,0.00024960242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008687799,0.00027387933,0.00018036012,0.0017110638,0.018051175,0.009852089,0.0007508858,0.0020952974,0.016765261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024171544,0.0002546568,0.00020482403,0.0021321927,0.016338158,0.0021608593,0.0014152282,0.004209599,0.0017099907],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071304726,0.0000040709347,0.00032238686,0.000010607324,0.0000019073118,0.00008263007,0.0054003387,0.000093996445,0.00007118844,0.92009425,0.06704402,0.006867568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004335455,0.000005334323,0.0030667668,0.000064504915,0.0000035428343,0.000054593365,0.0049844948,0.00014827524,0.00009247714,0.051606204,0.9399529,0.000016576349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9511967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97437245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07211407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07211407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07093631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5232267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232701384","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2014.937068","title":"Report of the Commonwealth Working Group of Experts on Cybercrime","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Cybercrime; Political science; Law; Law enforcement; Public administration; The Internet","score_opus":0.024125601566711553,"score_gpt":0.2560168851966746,"score_spread":0.23189128362996303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232701384","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04060772,0.026793057,0.017448027,0.31130883,0.059539884,0.019634986,0.048875015,0.0013621323,0.47443047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.092203476,0.023887036,0.017407548,0.053799845,0.011381784,0.01304181,0.05066286,0.001407138,0.73620844],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97799474,0.0038485914,0.0015361295,0.00166964,0.009463211,0.0054877237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94510424,0.004585724,0.0036221922,0.0030900163,0.03188446,0.011713417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024558779,0.0025200658,0.0010076214,0.009091792,0.0047681346,0.0065432843,0.00394347,0.008598715,0.034729637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026085254,0.0012575836,0.0015845756,0.004214501,0.0017854457,0.004236863,0.009817958,0.005263518,0.015430005],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009303755,0.00013943648,0.0035656083,0.0004223329,0.000021566859,0.00037865114,0.001600241,0.0002298441,0.0011895208,0.0021067467,0.9457501,0.044502955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020636071,0.00004195142,0.005574256,0.00061661686,0.00001364458,0.00006584715,0.001346779,0.000104056075,0.0003584302,0.0005987234,0.99123186,0.000027220398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.063371494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04245478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.063371494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005817466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.054860014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12988079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232703879","doi":"10.1080/03050710701594746","title":"Book Reviews","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03146703545260693,"score_gpt":0.31403694452634434,"score_spread":0.2825699090737374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232703879","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025142232,0.017812883,0.00053586916,0.004617485,0.0056307395,0.00009604159,0.0005812734,0.00046121294,0.9700132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00036607715,0.0040677898,0.00014183777,0.001063127,0.0006047408,0.000021158803,0.00023474517,0.00007738645,0.99342316],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999382,0.00004863677,0.000013284956,0.00006150874,0.00044001453,0.000054448374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904305,0.00017001506,0.000043887034,0.00011489113,0.00044730844,0.00018073549],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046294194,0.00092640205,0.00083746493,0.0032653054,0.0018251141,0.004262888,0.0012452228,0.0017905955,0.5431245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019660513,0.00047620322,0.0005150072,0.0033382964,0.0006599818,0.0021936148,0.0015232706,0.0019521872,0.5139815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050698827,0.000016283986,0.000028349335,0.000064853724,0.0000010277092,0.000013465979,0.000015604266,0.000025883579,0.00007354015,0.0018814963,0.93861187,0.059262574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019410206,0.000004260497,0.00008814617,0.00005876366,0.0000011825681,0.000016295608,0.000016708365,0.000012399942,0.000027110606,0.00053453335,0.9992368,0.0000018127586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007740411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025009582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5431245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016877877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027202712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6516774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237002303","doi":"10.1080/03050710600907114","title":"HJ Heinz Co of Canada Ltd v Canada (Attorney General)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.008003946763719844,"score_gpt":0.24502027256490552,"score_spread":0.23701632580118567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237002303","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022874687,0.0049262596,0.0007390429,0.07405644,0.0029300016,0.0004016118,0.0023600964,0.0003345256,0.8913774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.052623063,0.0015007325,0.00049145566,0.059741206,0.0002608923,0.00010483447,0.00033711654,0.000095056894,0.8848457],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924115,0.00025643082,0.00024660266,0.00066418684,0.0034822966,0.0029390734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99567956,0.0006760167,0.00015202464,0.00015659246,0.002602597,0.00073324045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002058772,0.0006141081,0.0005768305,0.0026959365,0.021748897,0.008730615,0.0024783562,0.020613566,0.05777446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008496917,0.0013690914,0.00087233016,0.0023821567,0.0029538723,0.0021731867,0.0020874536,0.008875817,0.008938297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061230465,0.000066220564,0.0035907696,0.00013554576,0.000036095873,0.0011346579,0.0014312464,0.00015892276,0.00069810747,0.108932495,0.86556745,0.018187223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040213883,0.00002247677,0.0071272347,0.00018751367,0.000054358814,0.0002324891,0.001187082,0.00014963586,0.0005446169,0.003193066,0.98719156,0.00006985463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9622943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98625714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05777446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030661222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12754728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22246379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239951440","doi":"10.1080/03050710601179150","title":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.030102616585432868,"score_gpt":0.3454846624718732,"score_spread":0.31538204588644037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239951440","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020326702,0.0075721513,0.00016229654,0.038636178,0.0021464385,0.0002536348,0.0032153493,0.00023775395,0.94574356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005736229,0.0027771906,0.00013505772,0.015383958,0.0007837767,0.00013705852,0.0005892124,0.000077897814,0.97437966],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788046,0.00013947458,0.000109757406,0.0002894636,0.0012083631,0.0003724268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978835,0.00052702357,0.0001294095,0.00017461865,0.0010246459,0.00026066235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013406223,0.0009305151,0.0006901037,0.003711985,0.008965647,0.008357592,0.0011727727,0.009519005,0.17299019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074631763,0.0010335422,0.00047765896,0.0037390045,0.001968997,0.0024368553,0.0019380815,0.008228172,0.065311916],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017345665,0.000057935347,0.000463124,0.00007943738,0.0000040625437,0.00009039509,0.0001912595,0.000038464146,0.00015686089,0.029271916,0.9509316,0.018697662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007462498,0.000008764966,0.0014760945,0.00013946403,0.0000030151045,0.00001624768,0.000095119816,0.000021141172,0.00004076813,0.0009996903,0.9971848,0.0000074653376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29143003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42500243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29143003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012748927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017559517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5794674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243102261","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2011.621655","title":"Canada: constitutional law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.03408508762595927,"score_gpt":0.28492890095226964,"score_spread":0.25084381332631034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243102261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009911834,0.002775931,0.0009704496,0.05455568,0.0014086487,0.00037205356,0.008868292,0.00062783173,0.9205092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06088105,0.0011858843,0.0014057001,0.025197422,0.0003985302,0.00026354854,0.0011060246,0.00031746988,0.9092444],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873403,0.0005849113,0.00037790253,0.0012369383,0.00723062,0.0032292402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887166,0.002228127,0.00020174123,0.00084337074,0.0065564658,0.0014536579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004702102,0.000974826,0.0009807219,0.0032415465,0.02700007,0.014666245,0.004107114,0.013294646,0.112808235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017030654,0.002037151,0.0009255149,0.0037595301,0.0067601167,0.0026458083,0.002672204,0.011173152,0.013110403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003870172,0.00008307983,0.001164561,0.00007947199,0.00001145298,0.00013510727,0.00089281175,0.00018038553,0.00044299717,0.2847526,0.6994371,0.012781647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041418483,0.000013714636,0.0041707186,0.0001307494,0.000023199524,0.000039812094,0.0005230562,0.00020943389,0.00040392388,0.007187319,0.9871875,0.00006911727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9847306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9923051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.112808235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10446247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22055174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7579318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246580623","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2005.9986711","title":"British Columbia law institute report on leases of unsubdivided land and the<i>top line</i>case","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Line (geometry); Common law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.023436442749723507,"score_gpt":0.29233966792657323,"score_spread":0.2689032251768497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246580623","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044385962,0.004962151,0.00047231693,0.052953266,0.0012718852,0.00027715732,0.010132142,0.00022731644,0.88531786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19509034,0.006731121,0.00070880365,0.023459116,0.00028828345,0.00025065258,0.0056922617,0.00014179871,0.76763767],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99384874,0.00031835499,0.00022464234,0.00025537642,0.0034420202,0.0019109163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920229,0.0020462626,0.00044710573,0.0003543971,0.003975767,0.0011535733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026782549,0.0004530829,0.0004462356,0.0046408107,0.009564005,0.008747988,0.0027819567,0.009125301,0.03433371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008494077,0.00094260694,0.00051749387,0.0057670507,0.0016549684,0.002024702,0.0017318364,0.0071116113,0.0034951246],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075095784,0.00011305059,0.0072983364,0.000108500826,0.000022519884,0.0008517189,0.0010339087,0.00032252818,0.0003836335,0.03989601,0.93666494,0.013229742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006566172,0.000040629588,0.05329864,0.0006378197,0.00010031293,0.00037204617,0.006028099,0.0007374098,0.0015181603,0.005364904,0.9317047,0.00013157245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9297939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9783065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.070206106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03021504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055075504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21922648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256726705","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2005.9986672","title":"Law reform commission of nova Scotia final report privity of contract (third party rights)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Privity of contract; Law; Commission; Political science; Business; Exclusion clause; Contract management; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04649608744291367,"score_gpt":0.3424570061971877,"score_spread":0.29596091875427405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256726705","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050313585,0.003654512,0.00095107843,0.0755946,0.005738349,0.003974782,0.027037099,0.00095615216,0.83177984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.043649122,0.0009479172,0.0012273953,0.019672796,0.000391185,0.00077410915,0.0032645012,0.00016461425,0.9299084],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867209,0.0006709694,0.00055392634,0.00097389834,0.006857899,0.004222465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98147273,0.003144262,0.00044924417,0.0013544494,0.011127026,0.0024522871],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065890257,0.0006990137,0.0010356732,0.0036334533,0.008877277,0.012626684,0.002898846,0.015598253,0.046333738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019059544,0.0016843965,0.0011136036,0.002227278,0.0018683759,0.0014962807,0.0029975607,0.0073603396,0.011314991],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022262151,0.00016456743,0.004686814,0.00025173355,0.000039227933,0.0007531652,0.00094442855,0.0003680912,0.0018833441,0.053019926,0.92206466,0.015601377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018732819,0.00008230693,0.049879104,0.00035905547,0.00007079404,0.000097428,0.00083219225,0.0005385262,0.0011826365,0.0018244255,0.94485873,0.000087552966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.869627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91879755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.130373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038991883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12838273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28290725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}