{"meta":{"query_hash":"4e6b8dc88670","filters":{"venue":"Communications in Information Literacy"},"cohort_total":19,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":19,"exported":19,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/4e6b8dc88670","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Communications+in+Information+Literacy"},"results":[{"id":"W1506621672","doi":"10.15760/comminfolit.2007.1.1.3","title":"Information Literacy at Augustana: A Programmatic Approach","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Information Literacy","topic":"Historical and Architectural Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Institution; Literacy; Critical literacy; Medical education; Sociology; Pedagogy; Social science; Medicine","score_opus":0.02995745623175952,"score_gpt":0.2788121173324437,"score_spread":0.2488546611006842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1506621672","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055279583,0.0012302488,0.008865993,0.0023968106,0.000559854,0.0015073048,0.000094096256,0.00049984077,0.92956626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844648,0.00010294813,0.011246671,0.0009229826,0.000097401105,0.0002033289,0.0010533057,0.000008415621,0.0019000948],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982745,0.000059093498,0.0010382627,0.00006633297,0.000252676,0.00030912933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982536,0.00024726585,0.0003161425,0.00075355574,0.00035275938,0.0000766876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051499833,0.00017550704,0.00019056759,0.00047731493,0.00092785433,0.0005021071,0.0006254283,0.000048469887,0.00020285511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016726136,0.00014737759,0.00008024505,0.00029862634,0.000274236,0.0065895044,0.00038996874,0.00029044205,0.0005616023],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037550482,0.00010693293,0.00047339607,0.00014555511,0.000016616152,1.8261632e-7,0.4496885,0.000023098655,7.6189735e-7,0.18220627,0.002460926,0.3648402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037051406,0.000028469894,0.001215369,0.000051715193,0.000007637315,0.0000049621863,0.0044431654,0.0024026022,0.000002829907,0.0011482723,0.99012876,0.00019572649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017120119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001332021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9876678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033508622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021809896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7218449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1532305657","doi":"10.15760/comminfolit.2011.4.2.92","title":"Why Information Literacy Is Invisible","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Information Literacy","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Critical literacy; Literacy; Subject (documents); Higher education; Perception; Position (finance); Sociology; Public relations; Pedagogy; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Library science; Business","score_opus":0.052332054789231676,"score_gpt":0.339579396082155,"score_spread":0.2872473412929233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1532305657","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018069806,0.00026859285,0.0062770955,0.020482324,0.0008319873,0.0013111868,0.0001274137,0.0005029689,0.95212865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7899705,0.0018975628,0.0586447,0.14656599,0.00012210921,0.0003593303,0.0012876102,0.000016716647,0.0011354386],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99716264,0.00026334636,0.0014313331,0.00011380303,0.00056558853,0.00046327477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99672806,0.00021280239,0.00057520013,0.0015425066,0.0007410327,0.0002003798],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012704488,0.00019723136,0.00019479395,0.001171786,0.0009953071,0.0012994051,0.002188258,0.0001636692,0.0020954318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004903415,0.00020498456,0.00009946215,0.0022239513,0.000400958,0.19722795,0.0003888995,0.0003864691,0.0022122988],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020162659,0.0000779119,0.006816987,0.00003091706,0.000007198317,1.5640406e-7,0.59192985,0.0000057236966,7.0915297e-7,0.26169422,0.029612808,0.109803356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039772544,0.000025132224,0.007243567,0.00008020011,0.0000039083143,0.0000020860955,0.0077922028,0.0023750453,0.000040617157,0.0056373808,0.97614783,0.000254275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017632992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023296467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9509932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016851173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003157083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583367090","doi":"10.15760/comminfolit.2015.9.1.178","title":"\"Mind-Blowing\": Fostering Self-Regulated Learning in Information Literacy Instruction","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Information Literacy","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Council of University Libraries; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metacognition; Information literacy; Praxis; Conversation; Pedagogy; Psychology; Higher education; Mathematics education; Literacy; Epistemology; Cognition; Political science","score_opus":0.07061583107805365,"score_gpt":0.4110357897957603,"score_spread":0.34041995871770664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1583367090","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88705623,0.00018887105,0.017123485,0.0008535217,0.0010002878,0.00058546115,0.000007651623,0.0004543205,0.09273019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9471906,0.000014923287,0.051297367,0.00033019442,0.000043287506,0.00014081215,0.0007765927,0.00001563537,0.00019061024],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961134,0.0016043609,0.0014991856,0.00014954478,0.0002704778,0.00036299884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971244,0.000387261,0.0006405865,0.00116883,0.0005970359,0.00008190213],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003952744,0.00023325326,0.00027096408,0.0017496747,0.00027371265,0.00042175045,0.0007204906,0.0002264567,0.00009135211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012297839,0.00026094218,0.00005535389,0.0018715524,0.00007823306,0.009680173,0.00041772478,0.0015030319,0.0005907691],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008102967,0.00009807872,0.032821327,0.000031201,0.000021413727,6.6558056e-7,0.32529667,0.00204076,0.000009963387,0.0059699444,0.00017320536,0.63345575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004469024,0.00014122564,0.17939936,0.00037683686,0.000014719833,0.00006975744,0.011543874,0.06551202,0.000027162176,0.00112277,0.73676896,0.00055427634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026578057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006997977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73659575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004594736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000117102965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128091093","doi":"10.15760/comminfolit.2013.7.2.143","title":"Minding the Gaps: Exploring the Space Between Vision and Assessment in Information Literacy Work","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Information Literacy","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Set (abstract data type); Space (punctuation); Work (physics); Task (project management); Process (computing); Literacy; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Computer science; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.05180351715787408,"score_gpt":0.3695345391201766,"score_spread":0.3177310219623025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128091093","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80480856,0.0004257283,0.0015092716,0.10775106,0.0006528679,0.00269596,0.000022047665,0.00015440526,0.0819801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989527,0.001280884,0.00537454,0.0028962542,0.00006947793,0.00052481977,0.00018999439,0.000004740702,0.00013231946],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973715,0.0004995186,0.0011524191,0.00009392324,0.0005117864,0.00037084566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99665874,0.0014492389,0.0004580306,0.00104858,0.00028926102,0.00009616398],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024977177,0.0001641816,0.00016379445,0.0005868602,0.0014655387,0.0034211564,0.0015608231,0.00007635541,0.000117945405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042889753,0.00011049066,0.000048915204,0.0021696736,0.00040016402,0.1326454,0.0004183056,0.00065917516,0.00028864003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041321896,0.000022385062,0.075406276,0.000022911148,0.0000050790363,4.2643748e-8,0.38568088,0.00009389552,5.0486653e-7,0.092081204,0.0017327054,0.44494998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024674754,0.000012362185,0.32675573,0.00018120672,0.000002870943,6.4312e-7,0.020272031,0.0038077664,0.0000026255498,0.002226467,0.6463516,0.00013994382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008698216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019935367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64461887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018293149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001701232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153453210","doi":"10.15760/comminfolit.2009.3.1.66","title":"Advancing the Promotion of Information Literacy Through Peer-led Learning","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Information Literacy","topic":"Reflective Practices in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Session (web analytics); Mentorship; Curriculum; Promotion (chess); Pedagogy; Library instruction; Literacy; Mathematics education; Critical literacy; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Medical education; Political science; Medicine; World Wide Web; Politics","score_opus":0.027230106647314685,"score_gpt":0.43191153790340964,"score_spread":0.40468143125609496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153453210","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11486532,0.00052448333,0.046085402,0.08966833,0.0009584631,0.0025422855,0.000014409928,0.00032156456,0.74501973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96391,0.0007507216,0.03406341,0.0006950201,0.00005563848,0.00009099399,0.0002535047,0.000004007945,0.00017673282],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972189,0.0008998948,0.0009893316,0.00007762576,0.0005601943,0.00025403383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954729,0.0009192185,0.0010441571,0.00092358596,0.0015987217,0.000041397303],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031181278,0.0001220863,0.00015010219,0.00034183817,0.0010105453,0.0005341877,0.0010748924,0.000102044934,0.00006629891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006944408,0.00011123267,0.00006133897,0.001428393,0.0002112717,0.031448394,0.000117602685,0.0005849288,0.00009242358],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020651205,0.00012869854,0.0035010222,0.000021404308,0.0000066606503,2.15872e-8,0.47841674,0.00077064673,0.000023145349,0.12318929,0.00031697648,0.39360476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036945278,0.00007346381,0.023985043,0.00014291522,0.000013448419,0.0000024042627,0.020497197,0.0063471296,0.00008006271,0.020155277,0.9281685,0.00016510896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043398308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004696702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9278515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003874043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027513187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9820982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2215546696","doi":"10.15760/comminfolit.2012.5.2.104","title":"Re-conceptualizing Access: The New Role of Information Literacy in Post-Secondary Education","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Information Literacy","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Access to information; Computer science; Outcome (game theory); Information access; Literacy; Simple (philosophy); Knowledge management; World Wide Web; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.025371968222127655,"score_gpt":0.36560038729146455,"score_spread":0.3402284190693369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2215546696","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18324928,0.0072510527,0.001271807,0.037358653,0.00186677,0.0032347455,0.00012243442,0.000253054,0.7653922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837393,0.00078242464,0.004949477,0.009357608,0.000120859666,0.00012505926,0.0007166737,0.000005506129,0.00020306442],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970922,0.00040248848,0.001554555,0.000072901996,0.00046754887,0.00041028982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967762,0.00058330706,0.0008249585,0.0011288871,0.0005305028,0.00015612209],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019161466,0.0001562866,0.00018474035,0.0009934445,0.0005049399,0.0010120487,0.002289118,0.00012569211,0.00057404017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010778678,0.00013827688,0.00007476756,0.0021921801,0.00030349987,0.1978438,0.00042939658,0.00043194898,0.00023550272],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000123935315,0.00006840062,0.015743373,0.000022638736,0.000003257878,5.4737312e-9,0.46221626,0.00003205961,0.0000028681482,0.15710376,0.002038086,0.3627569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030307224,0.000012279953,0.059233803,0.000120133554,0.0000036746633,9.203408e-7,0.06993866,0.00086363807,0.00004182702,0.0031504761,0.8661701,0.00016138607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031004264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001135069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86413205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019923528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016014703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9759209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2216340390","doi":"10.15760/comminfolit.2015.9.1.181","title":"Book Review: The Embedded Librarian's Cookbook","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Information Literacy","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.05492835904020717,"score_gpt":0.3724330036032845,"score_spread":0.31750464456307737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2216340390","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014650995,0.07917301,0.00040260536,0.26281267,0.00030227698,0.0010873873,0.000011964119,0.00015766533,0.6559059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.103398375,0.1540928,0.008658631,0.69253284,0.00036925415,0.0007198772,0.0012306949,0.000019172336,0.038978323],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986913,0.00036744642,0.00043105558,0.00005717335,0.0002996751,0.00015329976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983761,0.00022977218,0.00017986956,0.00094346335,0.00017673975,0.0000941006],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001285374,0.000063941676,0.00008145873,0.00009202061,0.0005002241,0.00043212587,0.0013845374,0.000042779873,0.0002978906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006903593,0.000049822625,0.000031998316,0.0006850565,0.00032466842,0.015997617,0.00015692845,0.00017330871,0.00044408187],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026916498,0.000020312898,0.00020513592,0.000012560912,0.000001398471,9.585567e-8,0.043536812,0.000006914601,1.5718332e-7,0.071291976,0.87610734,0.008814607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000118259195,0.000008949803,0.0002449005,0.00012961998,0.0000025035931,8.790673e-7,0.0027063978,0.00059245736,0.0000023742145,0.0014643022,0.9946621,0.000067256384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009005287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024097511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61692756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060678994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054306333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2226017320","doi":"10.15760/comminfolit.2014.8.2.166","title":"Pedagogies of Possibility Within the Disciplines: Critical Information Literacy and Literatures in English","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Information Literacy","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Critical literacy; Sociology; Creativity; Openness to experience; Pedagogy; Literacy; Discipline; Critical thinking; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Social science","score_opus":0.022074765730910176,"score_gpt":0.3730299423546859,"score_spread":0.35095517662377573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2226017320","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8302283,0.0009756,0.0030587243,0.0391687,0.0013123765,0.0020454933,0.00017652457,0.000323675,0.122710586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99103004,0.0001976031,0.006290334,0.0021121234,0.000053968288,0.000077611185,0.0001864164,0.000003234048,0.00004865169],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99705726,0.0005966467,0.0015483749,0.000103601335,0.00042733064,0.00026678338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958375,0.001855601,0.00046099673,0.001096431,0.0006609476,0.00008853763],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031924197,0.00015085145,0.00021321475,0.0005871491,0.00059931044,0.0013461207,0.0012435371,0.00012266719,0.000036475303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00671403,0.00011744234,0.00005294739,0.0013751737,0.00097655505,0.0757619,0.00039562464,0.00042825565,0.000021062357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016726375,0.000036220434,0.018605655,0.000065322936,0.0000016174442,2.1003464e-8,0.4835928,0.00006238649,5.1948e-7,0.4687501,0.00012260267,0.028746005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009839041,0.000076000775,0.18409586,0.00051527686,0.000008763317,0.0000027533845,0.0657982,0.054890458,0.000026489372,0.044049844,0.64912724,0.00042519238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039560668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007747951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64900464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006917273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020768537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2429218545","doi":"10.15760/comminfolit.2015.9.2.194","title":"Book Review: Not Just Where to Click: Teaching Students How to Think About Information","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Information Literacy","topic":"Online and Blended Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Mathematics education; Library instruction; Higher education; Computer science; Psychology; Pedagogy; Political science","score_opus":0.04437858349306887,"score_gpt":0.42318352598449166,"score_spread":0.37880494249142277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2429218545","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014647809,0.03528707,0.0113118095,0.6872988,0.0012736542,0.0064915745,0.000115057315,0.0008765144,0.24269772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20230003,0.06198043,0.22335951,0.48984239,0.00076216616,0.0012996345,0.0023987365,0.000058977414,0.017998137],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768245,0.00051419775,0.0007349301,0.00008505022,0.00070052414,0.00028287264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975213,0.00019605417,0.00031015073,0.0010702165,0.0006457437,0.00025654363],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003225398,0.00013217646,0.00019281886,0.00043486364,0.0006699198,0.0009281029,0.001735321,0.000087546745,0.00007590917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033954058,0.00013713463,0.000049147584,0.00073601695,0.000049942435,0.01360487,0.0005792143,0.00052571937,0.0012384657],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012835762,0.000056018995,0.0015551164,0.000104607534,0.0000072999874,1.0613295e-7,0.2187727,0.00016045012,4.902166e-7,0.0068968553,0.54024196,0.23219158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002611273,0.000028048784,0.0012603047,0.0008211141,0.000007901697,6.8805224e-7,0.013162452,0.00030106152,0.0000012466371,0.000025995316,0.9839652,0.00016486314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030612273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019715885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44372326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029351225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034767852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2497429993","doi":"10.15760/comminfolit.2016.10.1.15","title":"Reporting or Reconstructing? The Zine as a Medium for Reflecting on Research Experiences","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Information Literacy","topic":"Reflective Practices in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reflection (computer programming); Scale (ratio); Psychology; Critical reflection; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Computer science; Physics","score_opus":0.3903557567890661,"score_gpt":0.6226552990640538,"score_spread":0.23229954227498772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2497429993","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36129323,0.0001326736,0.001615744,0.09734445,0.0019499992,0.0022446252,0.000004547159,0.00016050496,0.53525424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9774447,0.00033681688,0.018741047,0.00049007393,0.00019658606,0.001639869,0.000008943057,0.000007380013,0.0011345947],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99670196,0.0010982594,0.0012475044,0.00014383145,0.0004733164,0.0003351276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98302114,0.013126833,0.0014924738,0.0011971814,0.001105906,0.00005644782],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0139987515,0.000085040585,0.00011796637,0.00038815098,0.002567504,0.00045340153,0.0012629123,0.00008236801,0.00015188355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10693991,0.000050768664,0.00004116624,0.0011091665,0.0006892477,0.0045604664,0.00018901173,0.00036994054,0.00008743738],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009033698,0.000052222527,0.0032472366,0.0000103171,0.000007104897,1.0708273e-7,0.5176731,0.0000021048145,0.000040439147,0.07071804,0.0010321747,0.40712684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024842977,0.00007168594,0.0006975181,0.00022271776,0.0000028725187,0.0000078174935,0.21971036,0.00014292514,0.0002727686,0.015347515,0.7631709,0.00010451883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047463318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038136388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76213866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052637584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079173077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2505647283","doi":"10.15760/comminfolit.2016.10.1.18","title":"Empowering Students to Make Sense of an Information Saturated World: The Evolution of Information Searching and Analysis","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Information Literacy","topic":"Online and Blended Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Variety (cybernetics); Politics; Psychology; Public relations; Higher education; Trustworthiness; Sociology; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Social psychology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.015627613094346376,"score_gpt":0.3959224055773447,"score_spread":0.38029479248299836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2505647283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9755407,0.000036510115,0.016286321,0.0021242239,0.000052563024,0.00048107162,0.000053165964,0.000041620206,0.0053838156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99084854,0.00009792648,0.008756867,0.000100412435,0.000008394381,0.000020742818,0.00013668685,0.0000017336357,0.000028706238],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821967,0.0003704701,0.00080780324,0.000041905685,0.00041540177,0.00014472129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99792755,0.00037143304,0.00048226176,0.00060237764,0.0005590015,0.000057369307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019743287,0.00007430793,0.00014031217,0.0014014805,0.0003367456,0.00021323349,0.00054426363,0.00004762364,0.00001564604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00078998983,0.00005435748,0.000039482664,0.0024624176,0.00014406301,0.0104601355,0.00024730412,0.00014590834,0.000014663552],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058258123,0.000047438432,0.058054753,0.00003885323,0.00006233892,2.7384326e-8,0.17805159,0.0013093052,0.00005221232,0.034778118,0.000023583667,0.7275235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012444237,0.00009283666,0.59126794,0.00040537157,0.000108751316,0.0000015309668,0.074076496,0.021310536,0.00010978693,0.0010806902,0.30997604,0.0003255747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009721409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010312558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72719795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018290522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001536805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7583346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594493455","doi":"10.15760/comminfolit.2016.10.2.31","title":"Changing Our Aim: Infiltrating Faculty with Information Literacy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Information Literacy","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Popularity; Library instruction; Perspective (graphical); Literacy; Mathematics education; Computer science; Sociology; Pedagogy; Psychology","score_opus":0.032617314583806414,"score_gpt":0.3535823699164558,"score_spread":0.3209650553326494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594493455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2096241,0.00021887722,0.09930575,0.22073416,0.0015782937,0.004565643,0.00070661976,0.0019377238,0.46132883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97308046,0.00016583822,0.017140312,0.007919769,0.00009296818,0.00019320741,0.0006491851,0.000008323829,0.0007499683],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972426,0.0002326789,0.0011934582,0.00011822577,0.0006433834,0.0005696534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969683,0.00029337086,0.0006837561,0.0011066729,0.00077171176,0.0001761472],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014376008,0.00021070067,0.00019793735,0.0012036623,0.0012271148,0.0014434434,0.0014745218,0.00012197737,0.00011451666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006709309,0.00015367787,0.000065429624,0.0022757642,0.00021417551,0.1799921,0.0002895572,0.00026428563,0.00072018465],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003563209,0.00004968314,0.012454256,0.000039589657,0.000011779634,3.0798304e-7,0.35107237,0.00007817082,0.0000068440895,0.14864309,0.0027522773,0.48485598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008475187,0.000037811667,0.004310887,0.00036432256,0.0000041539256,0.000005546803,0.024569523,0.0020283407,0.000050619306,0.0005542199,0.9669139,0.00031319604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015432584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015642985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9641616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002477832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003161184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782768125","doi":"10.15760/comminfolit.2017.11.2.8","title":"SoTL in the LIS Classroom: Helping Future Academic Librarians Become More Engaged Teachers","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Information Literacy","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship of Teaching and Learning; Library instruction; Curriculum; Sociology; Scholarship; Pedagogy; Higher education; Information literacy; Mathematics education; Psychology; Library science; Computer science; Teaching method; Political science; Teaching and learning center","score_opus":0.03660421365792755,"score_gpt":0.3184851412067212,"score_spread":0.2818809275487937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782768125","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37663114,0.0035431583,0.01597359,0.50717723,0.0014904147,0.0019671666,0.000051757495,0.0006941188,0.09247145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9737383,0.0005373876,0.01993076,0.005405043,0.000091618625,0.00010333332,0.00011075702,0.000006107759,0.000076688404],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819976,0.00061457057,0.00060622784,0.00012935107,0.00021353291,0.00023655772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99482816,0.00055620086,0.0004052028,0.004115348,0.000049126058,0.000045967372],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014863695,0.00014225107,0.00014145552,0.0003378266,0.0013542958,0.00185895,0.010099015,0.00014404402,0.000011991828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023250279,0.00011659107,0.00005197868,0.00048080523,0.00009889372,0.030888509,0.0013288531,0.0018702134,0.000073365576],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006613549,0.00008176379,0.046814438,0.000049990766,0.000011065652,0.0000016200713,0.5822332,0.00014759168,0.000011583652,0.19280508,0.0023720183,0.17546503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006285074,0.000014607427,0.37782973,0.00016362104,0.0000031757916,0.000010263715,0.010957268,0.07338641,0.000017916393,0.0037583064,0.5329781,0.0002520839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009301115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000033572658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5971072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004384361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009631924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884589685","doi":"10.15760/comminfolit.2018.12.1.3","title":"SAILS, Take 2: An Exploration of the “Build Your Own Test” Standardized IL Testing Option for Canadian Institutions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Information Literacy","topic":"Library Science and Information Systems","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Test (biology); Standardized test; Psychology; Mathematics education; Geology","score_opus":0.14943073771133847,"score_gpt":0.35210455736040275,"score_spread":0.20267381964906428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884589685","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0340259,0.00005334335,0.9234707,0.0069747213,0.0010187629,0.002143396,0.00039814843,0.00021824981,0.03169678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9046203,0.000012776769,0.09409395,0.00087204867,0.000042490155,0.00015897925,0.00015789241,0.0000033440044,0.000038209597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837065,0.00010616242,0.000921656,0.00010982441,0.00027016472,0.00022156218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961028,0.00023802916,0.0004933619,0.0019556277,0.0011075961,0.000102565195],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009913695,0.00011170476,0.00012834775,0.00051458296,0.0010094363,0.0007098996,0.0026113733,0.000069826005,0.0000062321105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010532946,0.00009178771,0.00004911549,0.0018890323,0.00021486555,0.057100832,0.00027415899,0.00013438551,0.000037718666],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012075791,0.00012234453,0.010622349,0.00007122137,0.000011102225,5.7551105e-8,0.122444905,0.002470887,0.0002655097,0.64726657,0.0018971707,0.2148158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068766327,0.0001397473,0.012514704,0.00017788491,0.00000294487,0.000007449899,0.0022309897,0.47856596,0.0005901182,0.0056621404,0.4991947,0.00022569882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017030352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001559495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8705944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017588379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001047278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.956087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3117683421","doi":"10.15760/comminfolit.2020.14.2.2","title":"Teaching and User Satisfaction in an Academic Chat Reference Consortium","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Information Literacy","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Robarts Clinical Trials; Ontario Council of University Libraries; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Library instruction; Information literacy; Psychology; Academic library; Higher education; Academic advising; User satisfaction; World Wide Web; Medical education; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Computer science; Library science; Political science; Medicine; Human–computer interaction","score_opus":0.04521409590193554,"score_gpt":0.3206750159784906,"score_spread":0.27546092007655504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3117683421","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94821703,0.00048408788,0.016786223,0.025838427,0.00008049879,0.0003817745,0.000010005831,0.00024986142,0.007952073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96110004,0.00019724686,0.0344011,0.004181599,0.000010556734,0.00002592124,0.000073161864,0.0000025020574,0.000007890792],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990013,0.00023561085,0.0004439562,0.000109719396,0.00009675076,0.000112661575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988645,0.000159635,0.00013904413,0.0007297608,0.00003774198,0.0000693757],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003049952,0.000080243095,0.00009291793,0.00020085045,0.000139211,0.00031633768,0.0010891528,0.000066508204,0.000007032344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006339556,0.00008389642,0.000008796277,0.00036209813,0.000031417196,0.022202147,0.0005124258,0.0006513286,0.00002880723],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012979518,0.000028479037,0.17987716,0.00007122087,0.0000028895938,4.8064976e-7,0.107940294,0.0001816821,0.00011880676,0.33448628,0.0001105038,0.37716922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000497803,0.000043032065,0.4557246,0.000093390234,0.0000014810001,0.0000060053076,0.0012058917,0.40750414,0.00003114593,0.0019886417,0.13269141,0.00021245723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001902218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000047823098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40732247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022537659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003462279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9914738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281766867","doi":"10.15760/comminfolit.2022.16.1.3","title":"Flexibility Is Key: Co-creating a Rubric for Programmatic Instructional Assessment","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Information Literacy","topic":"Reflective Practices in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Rubric; Flexibility (engineering); Key (lock); Process (computing); Engineering management; Computer science; Instructional design; Process management; Library instruction; Creativity; Engineering ethics; Mathematics education; Knowledge management; Pedagogy; Information literacy; Engineering; Sociology; Psychology; Management","score_opus":0.06994744401423979,"score_gpt":0.4988872160320599,"score_spread":0.4289397720178201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281766867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23647769,0.00029049063,0.022567378,0.029276796,0.001380228,0.0063355574,0.00026176262,0.00037803536,0.7030321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7950154,0.00006065809,0.20034538,0.0006120939,0.00005039474,0.0031726784,0.00053296075,0.0000066555817,0.00020379276],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976585,0.0008225979,0.0006908276,0.00012934828,0.00047121316,0.00022751236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99684095,0.0012360346,0.00055410457,0.00087184296,0.0004433988,0.00005364998],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032045622,0.00009458003,0.00012354155,0.00035358,0.0027722355,0.00039272444,0.00093464914,0.000043698652,0.0004105513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012867755,0.00011598747,0.00006523763,0.0010099944,0.00021488527,0.004589114,0.00025376797,0.00042209245,0.00002017894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032274354,0.0004283507,0.029369032,0.00006126428,0.000023795463,3.1055766e-8,0.24301875,0.0003740626,0.0000054033494,0.36146393,0.000991516,0.3642316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039686266,0.00004058872,0.010747045,0.00001595331,0.000009939888,0.0000024741255,0.023324324,0.013467304,0.0000052383084,0.025128068,0.92672104,0.0001411626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005373886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000053795877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9257295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015657889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007952919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99852604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389726504","doi":"10.15760/comminfolit.2023.17.2.8","title":"Impact of Library Instruction Tutorial Format on Student Preference and Performance in First-Year Chemistry","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Information Literacy","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Task (project management); Library instruction; Mathematics education; Computer-Assisted Instruction; Computer science; Multimedia; Chemistry; Psychology; Information literacy; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03152456967531245,"score_gpt":0.3364316827083692,"score_spread":0.30490711303305673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389726504","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9570097,0.000018888024,0.0000042620863,0.00060707977,0.00013824772,0.00029452774,0.00002733029,0.00008340652,0.041816577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970808,0.0019067066,0.00046860927,0.000092003786,0.000037235783,0.00005524641,0.00023541285,0.000003615043,0.00012039478],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864477,0.000078336765,0.00068625493,0.00007769115,0.00030223167,0.00021073998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885213,0.00021131441,0.00025460828,0.0005361447,0.00007954953,0.000066271576],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052452064,0.000099049954,0.00013109719,0.00050565915,0.00029221165,0.0002819415,0.00075211725,0.00008537847,0.00011634898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015980631,0.00009402545,0.000039517778,0.0016596252,0.00020098759,0.036161862,0.00026711327,0.00022169578,0.00007446677],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000848706,0.00009444495,0.7810731,0.00009339959,0.00000641732,1.099309e-7,0.15227118,0.0010167275,0.000002588008,0.029076487,0.0006816911,0.035598986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008449354,0.00007141351,0.912114,0.00020367149,0.0000013213821,7.6395577e-7,0.0043827156,0.008625285,0.000025734756,0.0005570703,0.07302884,0.00014424838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009358673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005050894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14788847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010693361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020165018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9773188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389729010","doi":"10.15760/comminfolit.2023.17.2.1","title":"Exploring the Role of Information Literacy Instruction in Student Co-Creation of Community-Based Research Products","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Information Literacy","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University; Community Based Research Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Community engagement; Experiential learning; Literacy; Sociology; Equity (law); Pedagogy; Higher education; Public relations; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.22832152202326988,"score_gpt":0.46433393648311116,"score_spread":0.23601241445984128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389729010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9629701,0.00005539365,0.000051750154,0.0024710028,0.00010125026,0.00076369004,0.000013655119,0.0000809627,0.033492237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972938,0.0006336678,0.00083411735,0.000096135045,0.000014481091,0.00036462795,0.0007397749,0.000005051873,0.000018365792],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939536,0.004046437,0.0009998361,0.000048057213,0.0007081499,0.00024391244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99488264,0.0019047724,0.00041307948,0.0015645173,0.0012030331,0.000031940894],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010787155,0.000093306815,0.00015669248,0.0016372935,0.0013090654,0.00022864189,0.0016966925,0.000059061706,0.000012657698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013160781,0.0000915741,0.000036831298,0.004392122,0.00036185124,0.0065017142,0.00042195272,0.0010998431,0.000049054208],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003152033,0.00015265743,0.014530161,0.00011169162,0.00000712288,1.9466164e-8,0.6937724,0.0026764562,0.000028241993,0.025020074,0.00005271569,0.26361698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078356086,0.00006438748,0.18457547,0.0004195868,0.0000057228945,2.5588386e-7,0.3979857,0.005234295,0.00057695137,0.0017025815,0.40851957,0.00013192289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007731233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004800888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40846685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028634883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000228554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411366062","doi":"10.15760/comminfolit.2025.19.1.4","title":"What Language Are We Speaking?: Marketing Information Literacy on University Library Websites","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Information Literacy","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Library instruction; Literacy; Academic library; Higher education; Sociology; Library science; Psychology; Political science; Pedagogy; Computer science","score_opus":0.009151639524250672,"score_gpt":0.25659579215088196,"score_spread":0.2474441526266313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411366062","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.176953,0.00634002,0.049669873,0.16520649,0.002775227,0.0022280493,0.00017902766,0.0028482908,0.5938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92134476,0.004283627,0.059447754,0.01193628,0.000038278766,0.000024565623,0.00093153934,0.000009226308,0.0019839955],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859816,0.00031774995,0.0005714794,0.0001269971,0.00018034145,0.00020528336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968002,0.0007387023,0.00037820925,0.0019064514,0.00012303259,0.000053402215],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003600398,0.00016474293,0.00015533731,0.0011427217,0.0003428764,0.0028658696,0.0028752603,0.00008769702,0.00006892632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009519634,0.0001745374,0.000063522006,0.001815048,0.00004543688,0.10367885,0.0014025803,0.00034795766,0.0003038973],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009778313,0.00015663341,0.011574066,0.00041861538,0.000029515251,0.0000031991437,0.08489856,0.0004970975,0.0000049038827,0.16457632,0.008774337,0.728969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047850644,0.000013004002,0.02685062,0.0012678275,0.0000036918086,0.0000020569978,0.0060031638,0.07893659,0.00007022739,0.0008106464,0.8853624,0.00020127797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023586146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000068257996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87658805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007313272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000104262275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99816924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}