{"meta":{"query_hash":"e326f3965125","filters":{"venue":"Comparative Constitutional Studies"},"cohort_total":9,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":9,"exported":9,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/e326f3965125","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Comparative+Constitutional+Studies"},"results":[{"id":"W4385259658","doi":"10.4337/ccs.2023.0001","title":"The old Commonwealth model of constitutionalism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Constitutional Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Constitutionalism; Sovereignty; Law; Constitution; Political science; Constitutional theory; Commonwealth; Constitutional law; Scholarship; Popular sovereignty; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Politics; Sociology; Democracy; Geography","score_opus":0.3310488656314156,"score_gpt":0.44505130988060854,"score_spread":0.11400244424919292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385259658","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02545507,0.0054863845,0.12242983,0.03787792,0.0005593145,0.00014370812,0.0001689363,0.00011314546,0.8077657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9180181,0.002840775,0.023014745,0.0040980787,0.00082619366,0.00044823537,0.0000963551,0.0001205535,0.0505369],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906155,0.004491716,0.00032694312,0.0017201661,0.0021212725,0.00072435953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944804,0.00260486,0.00038855686,0.0013529019,0.00085035834,0.0003228797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008574972,0.00039934518,0.0006941712,0.0037613378,0.0055116364,0.009535618,0.0018341289,0.0034579197,0.0060944594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0122864675,0.00036410568,0.0006635152,0.0030560235,0.06548661,0.011265453,0.0050481316,0.004734252,0.0008604074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.6777624e-7,9.212234e-7,0.000019670662,0.000004336635,7.076736e-7,0.0000028594113,0.00020776254,0.000033157594,0.000006940267,0.99898654,0.00017752271,0.0005587161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006145923,0.0000048204033,0.00010549127,0.000032037293,0.000001964936,0.000019430117,0.00015813705,0.0001879332,0.000025505382,0.9702617,0.02919338,0.0000034127058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0116757685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073196874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0116757685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011119528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068353014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080678225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386280553","doi":"10.4337/ccs.2023.0007","title":"Competing visions of ‘the people’ in Australia: First Nations and the state","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Constitutional Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Constitutionalism; Constitution; State (computer science); Commonwealth; Democracy; Sovereignty; Law; Sociology; High Court; Context (archaeology); Political science; Vision; Geography; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1349947796212766,"score_gpt":0.41089694808939337,"score_spread":0.27590216846811677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386280553","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4290413,0.0126146935,0.0027989259,0.061472077,0.0002870668,0.000046211528,0.000034836114,0.000017519154,0.4936873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98212767,0.0016178892,0.0005070237,0.0021065641,0.000037047415,0.00003160081,0.000009174356,0.0000061443525,0.013556915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99518484,0.0028149397,0.000107467386,0.00037272635,0.00073449133,0.0007855845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862266,0.00057500304,0.0001375115,0.00011672296,0.0001693617,0.00037878446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034750507,0.00021284392,0.00035422202,0.001367738,0.013285459,0.009549333,0.0008454943,0.0028116314,0.0022097363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003835124,0.0002559835,0.00029079727,0.0010219787,0.043937616,0.0061425064,0.005742234,0.0047577326,0.0001241272],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056391928,0.000011154715,0.0006825703,0.00002259432,0.000002168342,0.00014277286,0.09283017,0.00006975694,0.00012271552,0.90115833,0.00085315184,0.0040989895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020075773,0.00008349133,0.016818551,0.0006406358,0.000021822261,0.0006047025,0.22114027,0.00067033863,0.00049932726,0.4916017,0.26781604,0.00008299041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.108956456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15320586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.108956456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016373409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0104895765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21664453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400487220","doi":"10.4337/ccs.2024.01.12","title":"Legislative measures and legislators’ motives","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Constitutional Studies","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Public administration; Business; Law","score_opus":0.22114715005393126,"score_gpt":0.43062521804151516,"score_spread":0.2094780679875839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400487220","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.120011166,0.14801039,0.03320484,0.043564897,0.0018933007,0.00010018732,0.00023497756,0.00013350265,0.65284663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95096815,0.027952623,0.0039493474,0.0027939256,0.00072910846,0.00012666754,0.00017891322,0.00011363754,0.013187574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99153167,0.0038987799,0.00057660084,0.0008561253,0.0024013743,0.00073548127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99220157,0.0054776934,0.0009938107,0.00044637246,0.00066220324,0.0002183677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008923416,0.00031085697,0.0005418667,0.004441353,0.0022347579,0.004873077,0.00091744156,0.0017602887,0.0034910997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014960839,0.0004701342,0.00051471416,0.0037734194,0.014158456,0.005815784,0.0024236664,0.0029947048,0.0005388765],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007591719,0.0000079148085,0.00091235834,0.0001549249,0.000014233985,0.000018152354,0.002739774,0.00013281085,0.00013984733,0.9746294,0.0019259362,0.019317048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022390943,0.0000407609,0.021974623,0.0012581599,0.000044961296,0.00020427306,0.0065751392,0.0003709233,0.00084337295,0.3105939,0.6580011,0.00007043531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002841538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049548107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008923416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003814666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002588979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047192097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400487288","doi":"10.4337/ccs.2024.01.05","title":"Giving individual remedies in social rights litigation their due","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Constitutional Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Neglect; Law and economics; Political science; Transformative learning; Economics; Business; Law; Democracy; Sociology; Politics; Medicine","score_opus":0.20013886921196294,"score_gpt":0.41017101197632033,"score_spread":0.2100321427643574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400487288","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058302104,0.0064857276,0.13769276,0.12245741,0.0029112077,0.0005854708,0.000057602952,0.00054491736,0.6709628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9266145,0.0018180227,0.021390188,0.01801772,0.0011153278,0.00036601815,0.00002147959,0.00009796,0.03055876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9576187,0.019626845,0.0021654556,0.0052777124,0.009327989,0.00598329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818277,0.011570068,0.0018312443,0.0028116633,0.0009970071,0.00096231856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030501552,0.0006708941,0.0007341554,0.0024648225,0.011131541,0.015292978,0.0028676605,0.019059576,0.0065927287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038141686,0.0007909005,0.0016595735,0.0013768905,0.05010358,0.0144255785,0.014716453,0.013753688,0.00097255595],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048919665,0.000023352515,0.00016464184,0.000021914406,0.000005877171,0.00006245179,0.0011226757,0.00040365732,0.00009061724,0.9898859,0.0016351999,0.0065787565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049700735,0.000105989,0.0006593509,0.00027061833,0.00003480969,0.00022871213,0.0016617342,0.0018537613,0.00090972503,0.9142918,0.07985978,0.000074141506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038749033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008157788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030501552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008871263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0112320185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1613096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403114833","doi":"10.4337/ccs.2024.0023","title":"Beyond intergovernmental relations in federal systems: the concept of intergovernmental law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Constitutional Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Federalism; Public administration; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.07083201264125696,"score_gpt":0.37596322223261563,"score_spread":0.30513120959135864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403114833","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014477958,0.027368886,0.21676053,0.076853015,0.0018121392,0.0002536784,0.0002727099,0.00029232696,0.6619087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8992132,0.012999993,0.043528516,0.016528092,0.004279031,0.0007839093,0.00026274959,0.0001788836,0.022225745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874232,0.005411313,0.0005660079,0.002227107,0.002582126,0.0017903526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926542,0.0033948636,0.0010560969,0.0015950679,0.0008437993,0.0004558668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009566011,0.0006240339,0.00096355466,0.0029514746,0.009068606,0.013929842,0.0028933603,0.008798816,0.0060450085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008547878,0.0005361823,0.0015632444,0.0048698247,0.04329746,0.017955031,0.0055252733,0.010058088,0.0012113474],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.048204e-7,0.0000019859972,0.000030867708,0.0000072185376,0.0000015699748,0.000007814052,0.00017969852,0.00014018633,0.000011028379,0.99845386,0.0003985769,0.0007663982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006602791,0.00000824928,0.00019719862,0.00008862174,0.0000056686245,0.000029209885,0.00018210639,0.00047151474,0.000041018255,0.9268236,0.072136045,0.000010228476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010348634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006509843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014438777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014438777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012610584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10476118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406268164","doi":"10.4337/ccs.2024.0032","title":"Holistic interpretation and the interdependence of constitutional structures and rights: an essay in honor of Cheryl Saunders","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Constitutional Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Law and economics; Political science; Interdependence; Human rights; Context (archaeology); Law; Democracy; Normative; Separation of powers; Constitutional law; Constitution; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.10734654030703557,"score_gpt":0.40691126374667075,"score_spread":0.2995647234396352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406268164","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017453445,0.13309346,0.023272505,0.5488975,0.008738127,0.000044954115,0.0000856784,0.000048371425,0.26836607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7681123,0.09363983,0.012072813,0.058597162,0.013211571,0.00017647273,0.00014381035,0.00019583179,0.05385026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959927,0.002375822,0.00008460258,0.00042866162,0.00081130647,0.00030687798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948295,0.004180981,0.00017946129,0.00023332772,0.00044605654,0.00013071173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006375506,0.0004919115,0.0006754375,0.0013592351,0.005052586,0.006870259,0.0011357717,0.0032478045,0.0026850023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008810893,0.00041443185,0.0004996155,0.0018362157,0.037070855,0.01239829,0.0029123388,0.0077761933,0.0003958238],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005208123,0.000008457457,0.00006433079,0.000055871464,0.0000037363534,0.00003301551,0.0071361843,0.00017689154,0.00004850772,0.9594425,0.024948562,0.008076761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009835216,0.000009741067,0.00037914992,0.0003257234,0.0000051963007,0.000054392534,0.00481689,0.00020800838,0.000061164625,0.7514845,0.24263294,0.000012576974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007074141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008583935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007866317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007866317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048732134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057074428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413362586","doi":"10.4337/ccs.2025.0040","title":"How to lose a referendum (in Ireland) – challenges of practical and symbolic constitutional change","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Constitutional Studies","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Political science; The Symbolic; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.3540399763735338,"score_gpt":0.45122184252883324,"score_spread":0.09718186615529945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413362586","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16947596,0.006600005,0.013440719,0.34308296,0.0022868512,0.00018516077,0.000108457054,0.0003542745,0.46446565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9258766,0.0011842145,0.0037517685,0.02889722,0.00035724288,0.00011576193,0.00006958661,0.00030617672,0.03944144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9391198,0.031813443,0.00260622,0.0056218626,0.01148672,0.009351881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9724247,0.014999305,0.0024762996,0.0037009844,0.003332125,0.0030664688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06160545,0.0005322851,0.00079041184,0.0019326297,0.021764806,0.03550065,0.00480237,0.01067461,0.0060952823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061170135,0.000879103,0.0009536012,0.002220407,0.08402863,0.019089038,0.018631782,0.022153188,0.0016760366],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058128167,0.000056926943,0.002364023,0.00018920752,0.0000131865145,0.00081359636,0.21001275,0.00037803987,0.00047190787,0.714494,0.028938148,0.042210214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037447786,0.000114486786,0.0030144344,0.00057748397,0.000012068799,0.0005211161,0.2194258,0.0005898124,0.0010306711,0.1080021,0.6664888,0.00018584687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07364747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061218005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07364747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03993705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030307284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32580465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416959897","doi":"10.4337/ccs.2025.0054","title":"Constitutional change referendums: the democratic cost of failure","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Constitutional Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Constitutional amendment; Constitutionalism; Constitutional economics; Argument (complex analysis); Legislation; Normative; Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.25199360390160663,"score_gpt":0.42419306870512025,"score_spread":0.1721994648035136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416959897","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14806415,0.0027974036,0.16433789,0.0703671,0.0005143226,0.00018742465,0.00020848935,0.00024915315,0.61327404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867885,0.00030272675,0.0045799483,0.001611192,0.00028036925,0.00018110461,0.000035424542,0.00007523818,0.006145539],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.94802964,0.027362172,0.0021679613,0.006328574,0.011548014,0.0045636944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8836356,0.06348594,0.011445435,0.0308983,0.007108449,0.0034262184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042145517,0.000580358,0.0014791841,0.0022800616,0.0057841525,0.010951481,0.0027654897,0.0070976987,0.011150804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10159645,0.0008385402,0.0009221986,0.0020834575,0.042612154,0.020553363,0.012710597,0.010808681,0.0013886746],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021337257,0.000011342597,0.0005686642,0.00002504504,0.000011583166,0.00005407077,0.000778934,0.00075372023,0.00010617836,0.99221754,0.0006121053,0.0048394394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030378416,0.00003403438,0.00068889564,0.000052414514,0.000014821744,0.0001302195,0.00058438355,0.0014243014,0.00026001304,0.98140496,0.01535701,0.000018573319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001509783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013780922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042145517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055985195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046761576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22288948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416959911","doi":"10.4337/ccs.2025.02.01","title":"After the referendum: analysis of failure","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Constitutional Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.11277148263802543,"score_gpt":0.4123262602650102,"score_spread":0.29955477762698474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416959911","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6722642,0.00087942596,0.02589798,0.004708016,0.0001893816,0.00028202162,0.0005547652,0.00025263298,0.2949716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98190063,0.00010817368,0.0011241307,0.00016483178,0.00005582612,0.00011445221,0.00011983022,0.00016473969,0.016247353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99016297,0.004573511,0.00031653466,0.0011465519,0.0018527181,0.001947687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94534045,0.03286931,0.004428803,0.0070894742,0.007849945,0.00242194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019952247,0.00045252588,0.0011098523,0.0044595436,0.0062334263,0.0070087616,0.0030472423,0.002699508,0.015922299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.081088565,0.00038275518,0.000779544,0.0055823843,0.012950269,0.009180542,0.005006157,0.0036720799,0.001983119],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037602225,0.00012527539,0.026687229,0.00014655733,0.00004699691,0.0005163154,0.038873002,0.0018602595,0.00056010485,0.8748719,0.005868239,0.05006809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016192606,0.0008603048,0.11803577,0.00075744593,0.00028828366,0.0004657042,0.094663315,0.015101881,0.0046195732,0.6178909,0.14698479,0.00017011738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011528552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072756163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019952247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005201405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057172477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10551888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}