{"meta":{"query_hash":"28babdc68e8d","filters":{"venue":"Comparative labor law & policy journal"},"cohort_total":24,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":24,"exported":24,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/28babdc68e8d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Comparative+labor+law+%26+policy+journal"},"results":[{"id":"W1002906161","doi":"","title":"Canadian legal regulation of doclosures of information about employee or prospective employees to employers or prospective employers","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative labor law & policy journal","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Public relations; Political science","score_opus":0.022862358054652976,"score_gpt":0.27810777600154124,"score_spread":0.25524541794688826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1002906161","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05122245,0.0054657813,0.004187143,0.082974955,0.0021976614,0.001511218,0.0078057996,0.00097627786,0.8436587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30614722,0.0031525192,0.007951035,0.046465468,0.0007681991,0.0007744704,0.0026929216,0.0002760722,0.6317721],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9532678,0.003077648,0.0025125928,0.002967028,0.024697214,0.013477734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91641057,0.02381032,0.0032264953,0.0060529225,0.0439676,0.006532006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015932724,0.0009356653,0.0009767286,0.011337974,0.025913885,0.012720528,0.0067858943,0.01674282,0.01941278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055447437,0.00242639,0.0019739002,0.007246407,0.005791207,0.0026956943,0.00406638,0.009916427,0.0031083745],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021132884,0.00019699066,0.009724509,0.00052387005,0.00006566521,0.0006350485,0.009994156,0.00085420447,0.0032554197,0.40747273,0.5214241,0.04564196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014005299,0.00006328342,0.04474062,0.0006635519,0.00013844679,0.00017256556,0.002011263,0.0016790698,0.0030169375,0.008215898,0.93881273,0.00034559108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99195623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9957908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13310698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13310698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30649242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9657632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W112905303","doi":"","title":"Resisting Lower Terms for Imported Workers: Laval-Inspired Reflections on the Canadian Law.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative labor law & policy journal","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.20052605175619514,"score_gpt":0.4119146897691926,"score_spread":0.21138863801299745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W112905303","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07651704,0.004695085,0.003056741,0.39885727,0.0009755472,0.0000767918,0.00020948144,0.00004979437,0.5155623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.861503,0.0011792367,0.0014856468,0.062342517,0.0002761316,0.000054682903,0.000042533997,0.0000813332,0.07303492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897503,0.001751259,0.0001883069,0.00097239297,0.0028587729,0.0044789603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926864,0.00293313,0.00033117793,0.00042776027,0.0026611772,0.00096035004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009224772,0.0004159261,0.0004330385,0.0011390309,0.030120598,0.012211175,0.0037915977,0.015665898,0.0076379906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022093387,0.00038942823,0.00050838373,0.0017363805,0.03165592,0.004171217,0.004306025,0.015745156,0.00048455803],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026901327,0.000017159216,0.0011918345,0.000025061932,0.000008450295,0.00014156406,0.029791161,0.00018917136,0.00021546434,0.92044896,0.040458724,0.0074857334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009432133,0.00004440442,0.0122270305,0.00052831974,0.000077691526,0.0001330753,0.06267437,0.0010701771,0.0010205233,0.23208144,0.68983155,0.00021712607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97289294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98594356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08566365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08566365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11822414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62153614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W125689684","doi":"","title":"The Medium and the \" Anti-Union \" Message: \" Forced Listening \" and Captive Audience Meetings in Canadian Labor Law.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative labor law & policy journal","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Aphorism; Active listening; Power (physics); Sociology; Law; Media studies; Work (physics); Labor union; Political science; Public relations; Communication; Engineering; Art","score_opus":0.02464519059537528,"score_gpt":0.323181188415147,"score_spread":0.2985359978197717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W125689684","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13960333,0.046036005,0.0034782924,0.1931455,0.0019342273,0.00015769384,0.00017845296,0.00007432658,0.6153922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96517557,0.004988744,0.0005499238,0.009094979,0.0002634847,0.00006316436,0.000029104567,0.00003204037,0.019803075],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99406236,0.0028361778,0.00008093036,0.00030727973,0.0015110133,0.0012022848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99081004,0.0060706763,0.00059836905,0.00018625973,0.0012848356,0.0010498199],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005243369,0.0005308585,0.00020285751,0.0024769786,0.04057064,0.0086539285,0.0025515421,0.0054585603,0.005163553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016342083,0.00035155003,0.00024817305,0.0028723683,0.026879633,0.0056763208,0.004296596,0.005124682,0.00025238903],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050448387,0.00003066399,0.001729783,0.00019978467,0.000007866868,0.00061480433,0.5709377,0.000122023004,0.00028498704,0.34166667,0.054640263,0.02971499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027274504,0.000045951187,0.021607675,0.0007132453,0.00003248771,0.00027887805,0.43358386,0.00062785525,0.00044298868,0.021977229,0.5205533,0.00010932516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94351715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9774334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.085250266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.085250266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046592914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61853683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W160758295","doi":"","title":"Corporate commitements to freedom of association: is there a role for enforcement under canadian law?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative labor law & policy journal","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of association; Law; Enforcement; Political science; Association (psychology); Sociology; Philosophy; Human rights; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06389802507231487,"score_gpt":0.296609310794719,"score_spread":0.23271128572240415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W160758295","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15921786,0.0055540605,0.0026031916,0.21057795,0.0006872514,0.00010990559,0.0005193826,0.000068583744,0.62066185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93891066,0.0019948813,0.0008204433,0.008806068,0.00015550286,0.000032956785,0.00012882605,0.000036487418,0.049114168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9840969,0.0014342713,0.00030357554,0.001257996,0.00525012,0.0076571144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.964723,0.008709407,0.0016668797,0.0019533513,0.016390976,0.006556428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009970292,0.00036903546,0.00076383835,0.003861749,0.031165635,0.01858941,0.004000694,0.0067838086,0.015453451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04898245,0.0006574619,0.00069272186,0.005725703,0.030854642,0.0081079295,0.004422903,0.009455939,0.00065396295],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053864682,0.000053710282,0.007804195,0.00007332677,0.000015732201,0.00012715715,0.01291243,0.00036719986,0.00013583241,0.90456903,0.037258007,0.036629513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000109005414,0.00006577044,0.14076106,0.0013540016,0.0001425848,0.00020297882,0.070203856,0.0024716437,0.00076766935,0.26023978,0.5232907,0.00039100292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9944318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99628544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13911775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13911775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29150388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99850136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W174047781","doi":"","title":"Decency and Fairness in Labor Standars: An Australian Perspective on a Canadian Proposal.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative labor law & policy journal","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.057486766632472215,"score_gpt":0.3945374508587855,"score_spread":0.3370506842263133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W174047781","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.068721905,0.0076298453,0.006483739,0.42250866,0.0018801513,0.00032526182,0.00028973812,0.00005580022,0.49210483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81227577,0.0025460299,0.004801814,0.06288302,0.0008234694,0.00020681781,0.00006520385,0.000046445886,0.11635148],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9719777,0.006311529,0.0008759674,0.0024864275,0.010340699,0.008007681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9814409,0.006855018,0.00068813,0.0011590933,0.007832903,0.002023828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020479819,0.00062792853,0.00082783453,0.002282751,0.026458725,0.012293227,0.0061602187,0.028225904,0.0066067874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05115395,0.00064781366,0.0012075768,0.0027946504,0.028016584,0.00583874,0.0059250332,0.017016707,0.00049616245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024365567,0.000026330688,0.0010470075,0.000027148282,0.000010167042,0.00013101244,0.005526711,0.00035586083,0.00009395514,0.9682684,0.01923346,0.0052556247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022247915,0.00014625465,0.026055064,0.00095736975,0.00023132109,0.00023200408,0.020533966,0.0053794025,0.000872898,0.5642337,0.3807496,0.00038594534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9146006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9460955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08539939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054610528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14491278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39622897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W177782870","doi":"","title":"The Risks of Engagement: Labor Boards and Government in Canada.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative labor law & policy journal","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Sociology; Political science; Business; Demographic economics; Economics; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06925000058418594,"score_gpt":0.3841205919398664,"score_spread":0.31487059135568046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W177782870","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6484926,0.008131459,0.0008549262,0.17436022,0.00022510595,0.0000760233,0.00079519657,0.000022393928,0.16704215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797463,0.0013453381,0.0000971951,0.0025980056,0.000038957784,0.0000136850695,0.00007513765,0.000008279558,0.016077008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921257,0.00084318925,0.00009259894,0.00030877438,0.0016637737,0.0049659433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99235314,0.0020980393,0.0009761162,0.00017031214,0.0016650021,0.0027373666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025289839,0.00017910515,0.00031857763,0.0013899562,0.02035793,0.008726175,0.0015750681,0.0056983833,0.0112253595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015786547,0.00031222563,0.00031717145,0.003264084,0.0069364533,0.0028453236,0.004910918,0.005623329,0.00037575336],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025204654,0.00025242544,0.2178652,0.00008587949,0.00005558902,0.0007690729,0.056674793,0.0020777804,0.0001790654,0.5706663,0.07606949,0.0750523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012941651,0.00011213105,0.44786024,0.00075305026,0.00021198261,0.0002334087,0.1884196,0.0044613117,0.00053602486,0.080756605,0.27635634,0.00016990304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99176663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99662906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09148343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09148343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16486561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66376185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W208638767","doi":"","title":"On the journal´s mission in the next quarter century","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative labor law & policy journal","topic":"Christian Theology and Mission","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.08801713931080546,"score_gpt":0.3183768213958749,"score_spread":0.23035968208506946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W208638767","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.066345796,0.019918209,0.0004630585,0.546547,0.00495498,0.000018029805,0.00004383364,0.000014800563,0.36169434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8208402,0.0060987817,0.00017706961,0.061008368,0.0020322807,0.000024982643,0.00002725218,0.000028897051,0.109762155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997468,0.0008717124,0.000055211152,0.0001318321,0.00031743565,0.0011558288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974082,0.00059351965,0.00024430684,0.00008352146,0.00048106848,0.0011893881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035485448,0.0002631854,0.00025686313,0.0008502602,0.014817844,0.0083710635,0.00067405874,0.006573009,0.010525287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004962443,0.00020432855,0.00019034743,0.0009631293,0.019584838,0.0065317852,0.004477274,0.0106299,0.00083157857],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004055732,0.000030285608,0.0005049238,0.000027589509,0.0000024463577,0.00009465557,0.017765617,0.0000884172,0.0000739916,0.920917,0.04964139,0.01081312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015406611,0.00004156569,0.0023962513,0.00030081457,0.0000034693633,0.00006669632,0.029527342,0.00009240812,0.00010578782,0.109517515,0.85791016,0.00002261662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031552505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04249612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031552505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010736793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011936401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.077901244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2220234893","doi":"","title":"The B:C: Health Services and Support Decision-The Constitutionalization of a Right to Bargain Collectively in Canada: Where Did It Come From and Where Will It Lead?.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative labor law & policy journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.02759220643750637,"score_gpt":0.35200784229778487,"score_spread":0.3244156358602785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2220234893","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11902636,0.0036693332,0.0037316089,0.30877617,0.0010103792,0.0004674631,0.0031617424,0.000112275906,0.5600447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8258939,0.0008829998,0.0023924229,0.06371033,0.00021170499,0.00017296779,0.00026475798,0.000049653223,0.10642136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855811,0.0018815667,0.000382456,0.0011554878,0.0033590891,0.0076403897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99068683,0.0027004841,0.0003210143,0.00031992508,0.002791361,0.0031803977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072933882,0.00042685805,0.00053661794,0.0011835655,0.022133373,0.011238195,0.0027948231,0.014001276,0.015937801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018101059,0.00063135714,0.0007046178,0.0016171541,0.0102308225,0.002940424,0.0035099604,0.009079497,0.00084000523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010622949,0.0000601335,0.0068921344,0.000077655284,0.00003393816,0.00027903524,0.005598218,0.0005490421,0.00046707332,0.86830753,0.10530054,0.012328431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044757573,0.00015404788,0.06792104,0.0008239014,0.00030984206,0.0002967358,0.02368404,0.005048705,0.0021974246,0.16871667,0.72996247,0.00043756617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.990352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9933061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.088243715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.088243715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26521719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6402559},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255285947","doi":"","title":"A Comparative Analysis of the Law Regulating Employment Arbitration Agreements in the United States and Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative labor law & policy journal","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Law; Political science; Labour law","score_opus":0.05825391436794595,"score_gpt":0.35052752314189844,"score_spread":0.2922736087739525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255285947","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7189548,0.006375702,0.0011380365,0.01305499,0.00012521286,0.00019603917,0.0019535446,0.00006722094,0.25813442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840491,0.0016320336,0.00046750432,0.0010828817,0.000019164478,0.00003781882,0.00046915375,0.000018181318,0.012224119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99151576,0.0007870452,0.00017875199,0.00031276952,0.003487879,0.0037177543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863712,0.0033549923,0.0007799255,0.0002436296,0.008226142,0.001024049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00341083,0.00023509681,0.0007180449,0.00662091,0.014692688,0.009254148,0.0021183304,0.00215046,0.0059544127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01819097,0.0004045276,0.00075286545,0.012634814,0.0047663855,0.001336201,0.0017630266,0.0023867688,0.00027760502],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036571253,0.00026138788,0.111949496,0.00035517744,0.00030678726,0.0008275617,0.018296856,0.0115277795,0.0011943764,0.75910753,0.0414861,0.05432129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019770853,0.00011057261,0.71961284,0.000634861,0.0007430276,0.00017760869,0.0558462,0.01177598,0.0013652848,0.02501105,0.18432723,0.00019765463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9966544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99840444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16675676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16675676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21299261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.966444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263316426","doi":"","title":"A Canadian Perspective on the Scope of Employmant Standars, Labor Rights, and Social Protection: The Good, the Bad,and the Ugly.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative labor law & policy journal","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.02745876594960694,"score_gpt":0.33770174181996143,"score_spread":0.3102429758703545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263316426","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01886458,0.04043184,0.0032121409,0.2918337,0.0006379657,0.000052676205,0.0009795158,0.000029237835,0.64395833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86840725,0.027840195,0.0038543143,0.028208276,0.00055943197,0.00007665025,0.00027464802,0.00006106157,0.07071819],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939857,0.0011564048,0.00011232374,0.00045266424,0.001899676,0.0023932264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995152,0.0015043779,0.00023927585,0.00016606099,0.0020236815,0.0009145688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038465995,0.0006578016,0.0006614345,0.0053068036,0.018651139,0.010578735,0.0028646896,0.0065137357,0.011630696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0084928125,0.00041430682,0.00076876755,0.0071137496,0.019751064,0.0056002373,0.0025811472,0.0053289873,0.00044775035],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014603335,0.0000091608545,0.00091360026,0.000032008815,0.0000044521735,0.00005376242,0.003142624,0.00022135235,0.00006567776,0.9709972,0.019095957,0.005449618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051171577,0.000024555695,0.024344994,0.0010360288,0.000080311795,0.00016575324,0.028783476,0.00161576,0.0002495923,0.43491784,0.50859004,0.00014057182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99041045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1379069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1379069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14850208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560815933","doi":"","title":"Labor inspection and labor standards enforcement in Quebec: contingencies and intervention strategies.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative labor law & policy journal","topic":"Healthcare Systems and Practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Intervention (counseling); Business; Labour economics; Sociology; Criminology; Political science; Economics; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.1002569479753702,"score_gpt":0.5133875919141977,"score_spread":0.4131306439388275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560815933","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9224022,0.005068344,0.0012969559,0.02982005,0.00012655879,0.0002857922,0.0018587023,0.000057409787,0.039083853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905772,0.0005940362,0.00035278857,0.0012070473,0.00001558956,0.000045463687,0.00022733731,0.0000043997165,0.0069760866],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99649614,0.0011605534,0.00006449022,0.00020837682,0.00046305737,0.001607366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932834,0.002042676,0.001052902,0.00016863877,0.0020522245,0.0014002016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026107547,0.00022938989,0.00023711292,0.001247722,0.004068996,0.002047328,0.0016568067,0.0016614716,0.0069814497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0090427445,0.00023690186,0.00033839053,0.0019963356,0.002059496,0.00096913637,0.0013048279,0.0015942863,0.00020594987],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007161434,0.0009904074,0.81559855,0.0002924049,0.00027449336,0.00092939957,0.006692382,0.006995997,0.0020893528,0.028760917,0.039010357,0.09764962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048660244,0.00012994964,0.96891415,0.00019765712,0.000077506826,0.000038129227,0.011780729,0.0034973253,0.00032948365,0.0010478771,0.0139008425,0.00003772701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9936632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07099588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07099588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10552919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5151136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2745085747","doi":"","title":"God at Work: Religion in the Workplace and Limits of Pluralism in Canada.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative labor law & policy journal","topic":"Religion, Society, and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Sociology; Work (physics); Religious studies; Religious pluralism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.039010179138996626,"score_gpt":0.3415679991483197,"score_spread":0.3025578200093231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2745085747","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.886692,0.0027213127,0.00027931732,0.049404602,0.00012594729,0.00003978835,0.00024014653,0.000007507331,0.06048945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993996,0.00047144204,0.00009929394,0.0011691583,0.000010398559,0.0000069018897,0.000026017568,0.000004396536,0.0042162295],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99445784,0.0009958276,0.00011181926,0.00034671935,0.0011330639,0.0029546649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99015146,0.0017953732,0.0007027488,0.0002485824,0.0025172483,0.0045845783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029377397,0.00016329878,0.0004254674,0.0012043559,0.039503593,0.0071600927,0.0025992438,0.003090836,0.0056272466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0120565165,0.00028589382,0.0002628348,0.002269515,0.013992037,0.0021239927,0.005333202,0.004532677,0.00021852693],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029147562,0.00036978893,0.14510538,0.00014778988,0.000056644272,0.0009581968,0.47812492,0.00052439375,0.0007201821,0.27301815,0.029578181,0.071104854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004842802,0.000052556687,0.22798957,0.0005308212,0.000053444954,0.00018721381,0.654498,0.00073490985,0.00030122552,0.01986956,0.09562386,0.00011050178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9941257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.090707436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.090707436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2114078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6581316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W278529428","doi":"","title":"Progress and paradox: the remarkable yet limited advance of employment Good Faith duties in canadian common law.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative labor law & policy journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Faith; Law; Good faith; Sociology; Fair dealing; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06557344148897327,"score_gpt":0.368046371583262,"score_spread":0.3024729300942887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W278529428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0723209,0.009712072,0.0031624215,0.33811873,0.0009329793,0.000042571402,0.00059223635,0.000076944736,0.5750412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95837736,0.001981514,0.0010533949,0.0136367865,0.00019123951,0.000015596454,0.00008866532,0.00003184809,0.024623657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922954,0.000915724,0.00017480651,0.0009977825,0.0035159881,0.0021003946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98615324,0.004398395,0.00058080495,0.0013816467,0.0054091257,0.0020767476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0087397685,0.000251877,0.00052093714,0.0025032477,0.020377818,0.010387182,0.0022247,0.005815459,0.011026464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034712818,0.00025694421,0.00033446285,0.003104411,0.02722791,0.008454101,0.005208864,0.0068337247,0.00048180312],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017952845,0.000011028418,0.0010127289,0.000030625673,0.00000509969,0.000052112573,0.0050467304,0.00016784325,0.00007839926,0.9536028,0.02188637,0.018088425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035098205,0.000029229765,0.025231106,0.00054439117,0.00004888906,0.000115704344,0.016745374,0.0011158042,0.00040952934,0.48917428,0.46644995,0.00010063858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94743687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97441643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06920729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06920729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16423662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50213635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W28382576","doi":"10.1007/s11255-017-1582-2","title":"Public Sector Industrial Relations in Canada: Does It Threaten or Sustain Democracy?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative labor law & policy journal","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Public sector; Political science; Public administration; Political economy; Development economics; Economic growth; Sociology; Economics; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.12232510625971672,"score_gpt":0.34266412382475403,"score_spread":0.22033901756503732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W28382576","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54104406,0.004145206,0.0006688099,0.2667063,0.0004535855,0.00010909456,0.0006641066,0.00006653786,0.18614224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9723307,0.0012529215,0.00018267328,0.006055207,0.00005814107,0.0000144557935,0.00007815816,0.000015269758,0.020012459],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932586,0.00069497415,0.00007656605,0.0002821161,0.0011990007,0.0044887336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99125963,0.0010405408,0.0007693738,0.0002643046,0.0020810072,0.0045850347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032309543,0.00019833884,0.00036640893,0.0018156654,0.023758141,0.010170623,0.0017499703,0.003201561,0.020837728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008154629,0.00024418902,0.0003387446,0.0035324204,0.008934386,0.0024970246,0.0036147027,0.0042712837,0.00075865415],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028178387,0.0004695415,0.2304468,0.00028461943,0.00007932404,0.0016428168,0.051211048,0.0009973199,0.000825938,0.4127478,0.10569416,0.19531891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000100725905,0.000119091725,0.32172313,0.000623485,0.00006391955,0.0002651649,0.19367804,0.0015220148,0.0005437749,0.03000909,0.4512318,0.00011975742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98723805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9956703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13977793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13977793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28405938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970650189","doi":"","title":"Big brands, responsabilities? An examination of fraxhisor accountability for employment contraventions in the United States, Canada, and Australia.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative labor law & policy journal","topic":"Business Law and Ethics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.09666098016990686,"score_gpt":0.3454948991095839,"score_spread":0.24883391893967705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970650189","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7524851,0.0019319038,0.0009486396,0.07351571,0.00016928941,0.00008727696,0.00012595684,0.00002348396,0.17071277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99156255,0.00028604982,0.00013778695,0.0030025158,0.000020812124,0.00001234188,0.000012710505,0.000008197984,0.0049571027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98655987,0.002767474,0.00039776904,0.000678484,0.004687582,0.004908792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9578966,0.020948362,0.0056921523,0.0011449162,0.009657321,0.0046606343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012779914,0.00012858256,0.00030166082,0.0024016108,0.017552849,0.0086923065,0.0019723799,0.004353676,0.0048089107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05360344,0.00036107938,0.00034500874,0.0029157002,0.013648842,0.0037685453,0.0040478143,0.006845188,0.0001598383],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000093881885,0.00022982349,0.15566425,0.0001112131,0.0000509143,0.0007799209,0.18246043,0.0005436652,0.00042563723,0.5744038,0.027145516,0.058091074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003474143,0.00009725039,0.46337274,0.00090774114,0.00015424014,0.00027948705,0.35856757,0.002673366,0.00089924585,0.04763659,0.12523517,0.00014185734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88471895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95623237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.115281045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037372395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09603984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27115697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121466203","doi":"","title":"Precarius Migrant Status and Precarius Employment: The Paradox of International Right for Migrant Workers.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative labor law & policy journal","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Migrant workers; Demographic economics; Sociology; Socioeconomics; Labour economics; Political science; Economic growth; Economics","score_opus":0.08014467587206835,"score_gpt":0.43665986886681957,"score_spread":0.3565151929947512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121466203","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32928008,0.009716576,0.0012564455,0.28265882,0.0005058654,0.000019136238,0.00021278064,0.000016000884,0.37633425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871273,0.0010231162,0.0001327161,0.0066085574,0.00024534247,0.000014032145,0.0000272956,0.0000076900815,0.0048138313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836224,0.0006321078,0.000057677975,0.00020485137,0.0002234203,0.0005196932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99403834,0.0032111395,0.0008288128,0.0004323212,0.00044930974,0.0010400709],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032234234,0.00013919816,0.00034759822,0.00092395453,0.004108491,0.0041943877,0.00071608665,0.004710462,0.011003172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012342429,0.00014443397,0.00024563514,0.0007873947,0.013093976,0.004355042,0.004692888,0.0051142145,0.00047624367],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006340763,0.000048758207,0.0049648406,0.000035924662,0.0000056238996,0.0002829987,0.0067771813,0.000069189366,0.0001691454,0.9728751,0.006228065,0.008479767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000088215085,0.000050898336,0.027393881,0.0005632796,0.000026380489,0.0005967893,0.027161863,0.00034025533,0.0002957185,0.88385206,0.059595555,0.000035107576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008364511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013031753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011003172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016165175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003253784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036809266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122128148","doi":"","title":"Undefined rights: The challenge or using evolving Labor Standards in U.S. and canadian free trade agreements to improve working women`s lives.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative labor law & policy journal","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Labour economics; Business; Sociology; International trade; Economics","score_opus":0.08294144467688018,"score_gpt":0.39676610918004024,"score_spread":0.31382466450316004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122128148","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12057563,0.0046648355,0.0135119455,0.35968393,0.00096408464,0.0002139721,0.0003978549,0.000099321725,0.49988857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94276446,0.0010086397,0.0040498474,0.029529218,0.00015355261,0.000093129296,0.00007149023,0.000052707852,0.022276985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9691515,0.008315347,0.0012359484,0.002414564,0.011321335,0.0075613065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9677214,0.012536866,0.00222079,0.0039529875,0.010567172,0.0030006766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032608885,0.00034817,0.00047031324,0.0013110945,0.017221056,0.015567408,0.0047492865,0.010679556,0.00443087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0625287,0.0003583309,0.0005381882,0.0016645201,0.036212016,0.010794985,0.006705648,0.011211421,0.00038316686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013103682,0.000022697992,0.0019116225,0.000021163736,0.000005040048,0.000041176314,0.013235804,0.00013826007,0.00022341202,0.9623268,0.0072740954,0.014786807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069689406,0.00007622619,0.019823454,0.0013109347,0.00008288198,0.00010502684,0.052652612,0.0011702515,0.0016581123,0.5888187,0.3340154,0.00021665238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.76436424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87865573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23563576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040127736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16280192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4740469},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122633455","doi":"","title":"The Temporary Foreign Worker Program in Canada: Low-Skilled Workers as an Extreme Form of Flexible Labor.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative labor law & policy journal","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Migrant workers; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Business; Economic growth; Economics","score_opus":0.045609870454099546,"score_gpt":0.3592024329567666,"score_spread":0.3135925625026671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122633455","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9225132,0.000920594,0.00037578755,0.019829677,0.000093745875,0.00008318695,0.00067469553,0.000020477026,0.05548878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890764,0.00030071154,0.00024520454,0.0018626732,0.000011815128,0.000020707465,0.000125516,0.000006499892,0.00835049],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979978,0.00015635842,0.000016605429,0.000068767105,0.00024562905,0.0015147423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983695,0.000109254855,0.0001432883,0.000042598956,0.00026252054,0.0010727909],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082268496,0.00009697716,0.0001559785,0.00058664347,0.008869285,0.0028261514,0.00094906293,0.0015703599,0.0037780562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027262957,0.00014100714,0.00017520948,0.0014246765,0.0032259338,0.00094595517,0.0019497139,0.0022051067,0.00014636763],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008215682,0.00056908664,0.40033856,0.00018709194,0.000056235764,0.0022083968,0.037943587,0.0019662823,0.0021530536,0.3117233,0.07788803,0.16414478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014003046,0.00014150664,0.77450794,0.0003497842,0.000085046166,0.000376465,0.11706113,0.001978087,0.00075358694,0.009040322,0.09545742,0.00010865585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9849519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99718434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031042764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031042764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10683502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22523206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124268706","doi":"","title":"\" Best Practice\" in the Regulation of International Labor Standards: Lesson of the U.S.-Cambodia Textili Agreement.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative labor law & policy journal","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Agreement; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03550243357090642,"score_gpt":0.40148012752583917,"score_spread":0.36597769395493274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124268706","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01677901,0.015106563,0.009883827,0.5048801,0.0031122915,0.00019644547,0.00026249117,0.000121894715,0.44965738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7254312,0.0074574985,0.020174872,0.14139326,0.0009564806,0.0005519096,0.00022126391,0.00009945327,0.10371406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98441374,0.007678522,0.0011010497,0.0017696756,0.0034301835,0.0016067934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903314,0.005118026,0.00066145667,0.0013839285,0.0020435823,0.0004615823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01917351,0.000632553,0.00042696384,0.001405889,0.006837859,0.009790359,0.0028313245,0.012998161,0.003510963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02828305,0.0005219999,0.00041187086,0.0015661855,0.019709187,0.005436284,0.005694149,0.012371904,0.00061322027],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001426723,0.000016658827,0.0005771611,0.00012941599,0.000007835988,0.00012245688,0.0075171124,0.00027975056,0.00022003676,0.9349201,0.037670933,0.018524302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051657084,0.00007371243,0.0069627855,0.002648701,0.00004481959,0.00020392152,0.011093077,0.0009060625,0.0018224692,0.41560212,0.5604828,0.00010801176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09931513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14846794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09931513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012967248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030715851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19747412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W5026393","doi":"","title":"Future Directions for Labor Law Scholarship and International Collaboration.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative labor law & policy journal","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Collective bargaining; Labour law; Labor relations; Globalization; Work (physics); Value (mathematics); Political science; Face (sociological concept); Object (grammar); Sociology; Flexibility (engineering); Law and economics; Law; Economics; Social science; Management; Engineering","score_opus":0.052046884062353284,"score_gpt":0.4174098800469915,"score_spread":0.3653629959846382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W5026393","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013391499,0.0713722,0.0040962924,0.81079495,0.0069879987,0.00005077793,0.00008946727,0.000101193764,0.105167985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29045054,0.17183088,0.046387456,0.2944696,0.04067137,0.0014625096,0.0012107565,0.00036117135,0.15315574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9760074,0.013977725,0.00091598294,0.0019441445,0.0032282074,0.003926508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95131576,0.019741997,0.0027104167,0.0044527566,0.008662084,0.0131170675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03053527,0.00085650483,0.0014242043,0.0035878737,0.010275118,0.020067578,0.003108333,0.016617417,0.06314659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02552778,0.00037766527,0.0015034432,0.0052575245,0.01724668,0.047475554,0.014648037,0.013462474,0.008048241],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031544187,0.00014226238,0.00031210852,0.00031063432,0.000009313255,0.00007181817,0.0031588261,0.00010158659,0.00005596299,0.85750014,0.08947029,0.048835482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003523006,0.000041334213,0.0005058273,0.0010768324,0.000009491966,0.00009824016,0.015540903,0.00017701063,0.00005744864,0.41799304,0.5644419,0.000022712311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004020486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005064278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06314659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0112955645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032982785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21124637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W60730884","doi":"","title":"Free Speech and Privacy in the Internet Age: The Canadian Perspective","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative labor law & policy journal","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wonder; Perspective (graphical); Madam; Charm (quantum number); The Internet; Advertising; Media studies; Sociology; Art history; History; Art; Internet privacy; Law; Political science; Visual arts; Business; Psychology; World Wide Web; Computer science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.08632724559892835,"score_gpt":0.373578246675864,"score_spread":0.28725100107693563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W60730884","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020760614,0.023110984,0.00076336,0.24715117,0.00053251087,0.000036658195,0.00046594418,0.000027274082,0.70715135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7909118,0.048792038,0.00086944003,0.049427785,0.0010468912,0.00007652185,0.0002156025,0.000081344995,0.108578615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99237263,0.0012057998,0.0001279814,0.00046946615,0.0020913524,0.0037328277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908496,0.0033973414,0.00044244,0.00031194565,0.0026386743,0.0023599758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036493787,0.00060584006,0.00072699314,0.0047275415,0.040064428,0.022085447,0.0024125022,0.010589276,0.025321634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009299428,0.000467469,0.0006100758,0.008259091,0.03255789,0.01136638,0.004710415,0.008617527,0.0013045451],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020562115,0.000025814736,0.001047931,0.00006484893,0.0000072593593,0.00023702005,0.018810788,0.00022807239,0.000049441333,0.9321351,0.036968395,0.0104049025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034112178,0.00001894268,0.008135201,0.0009067531,0.000042108735,0.0002778933,0.0759717,0.0007276768,0.00010810547,0.12883005,0.78482157,0.00012575783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.992316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9929595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1685581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1685581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16973284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96435475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W69395305","doi":"","title":"THE PUBLIC SECTOR IN THE UNITED STATES AND GERMANY: COMPARATIVE ASPECTS IN AN EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS PERSPECTIVE","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative labor law & policy journal","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unitary state; Constitution; Political science; State (computer science); Public sector; Public administration; Federalism; Federal state; Perspective (graphical); Federal law; Law; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07445902079397537,"score_gpt":0.3893401811315499,"score_spread":0.3148811603375745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W69395305","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5785686,0.070014924,0.00070217374,0.011977574,0.00021021244,0.000023956298,0.0009346152,0.000028775588,0.3375392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97950935,0.013111369,0.0002080657,0.0007416488,0.00012294612,0.000023232213,0.00034411383,0.000007850049,0.0059314305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998716,0.0004700359,0.000033123175,0.00006528759,0.00017615096,0.0005393562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988902,0.0005888976,0.00023251305,0.000040345334,0.00014833313,0.000099684206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012028568,0.00019139716,0.00031094352,0.007017684,0.0018200706,0.005175702,0.00045671168,0.0012247267,0.009570973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023529083,0.00022424632,0.00035578222,0.0122597385,0.0024130174,0.0035598017,0.0017846505,0.00063891587,0.00052467635],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035356707,0.00025390167,0.04819811,0.0005921135,0.00013905964,0.0008833611,0.020874396,0.0014485442,0.0005328482,0.8153718,0.017740749,0.09361156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006136744,0.0002834867,0.56902057,0.0015598314,0.00024756565,0.0005533699,0.09507289,0.001642585,0.0006328162,0.061163653,0.26970923,0.000052692074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059996273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10406948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059996273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005481572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018912542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11929411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W83294707","doi":"","title":"Fairness at Work (The Arthurs Report): An Argentinean Perspective.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative labor law & policy journal","topic":"Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Perspective (graphical); Business; Point (geometry); Object (grammar); Private sector; Relation (database); Public relations; Political science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.1437760778635621,"score_gpt":0.4202455099948463,"score_spread":0.27646943213128417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W83294707","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01426291,0.20858794,0.0017625734,0.41281024,0.01332444,0.00013684422,0.0008007603,0.000070952294,0.3482433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4782705,0.079714805,0.0037175503,0.14659768,0.01616459,0.0004740062,0.00093906495,0.00021377849,0.27390805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98945296,0.0031234173,0.00038335496,0.0011208003,0.003569828,0.0023496815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99397933,0.0023471569,0.0005539235,0.0003909247,0.0020532196,0.0006753974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012415112,0.0006140443,0.0003598656,0.0018017474,0.007936436,0.011187633,0.0016209332,0.00912609,0.005590638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013681426,0.0003965837,0.00044129667,0.0021277587,0.007283935,0.0043452135,0.0027000925,0.0060982704,0.0006736189],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003698204,0.000034509405,0.0013127242,0.00030989613,0.000013822631,0.00021095447,0.007457814,0.0001922883,0.00012939182,0.5986634,0.34719357,0.044444595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007638829,0.000019288886,0.007672344,0.0008049244,0.000011123591,0.00007334209,0.0028970162,0.00008599463,0.000107324275,0.012247136,0.97604764,0.00002625879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33038956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28927296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33038956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01706583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022575025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65693295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W95396549","doi":"","title":"Psychological Harassment Legislation in Québec: The First Five Years.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative labor law & policy journal","topic":"Suicide and Self-Harm Studies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harassment; Legislation; Political science; Sociology; Criminology; Social psychology; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.06499723531187267,"score_gpt":0.40879568182157533,"score_spread":0.34379844650970265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W95396549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6637228,0.061581362,0.0007800668,0.16529033,0.0020520953,0.0003887337,0.013995622,0.00018055312,0.09200844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8961979,0.01289548,0.00049565744,0.016882574,0.00027199677,0.00015748708,0.0024478822,0.00003529044,0.07061574],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801266,0.00021299522,0.000065749045,0.00010553102,0.0006981328,0.000904903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99162865,0.0008706451,0.00086766604,0.00014726826,0.0041892696,0.002296519],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019918925,0.00024010749,0.00028076183,0.0017836662,0.004794027,0.0028169185,0.0016486148,0.0029790113,0.008525641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068275556,0.00026612572,0.00038061696,0.0029517878,0.0016383289,0.0011343667,0.0012299295,0.0026824612,0.00054230384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049119437,0.000805889,0.37103227,0.0011043102,0.00022902599,0.0011672085,0.016240016,0.0018734765,0.0012701638,0.03476186,0.33143008,0.23959452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037691007,0.000100275916,0.7855212,0.00052585796,0.00006241136,0.00011788762,0.008931025,0.00061467296,0.00030511888,0.0003175065,0.20340392,0.00006235294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9967867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99867225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09781448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09781448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12680604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.709697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}