{"meta":{"query_hash":"e172ac17eb26","filters":{"venue":"Compensation & Benefits Review"},"cohort_total":23,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":23,"exported":23,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/e172ac17eb26","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Compensation+%26+Benefits+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1963533139","doi":"10.1177/088636870003200104","title":"Shattering the Myths about Dot.Com Employee Pay","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Compensation & Benefits Review","topic":"ICT Impact and Policies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"PricewaterhouseCoopers (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Business; The Internet; Marketing; Public relations; Political science","score_opus":0.02608504453434129,"score_gpt":0.25942799220265367,"score_spread":0.23334294766831237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1963533139","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026696658,0.01849983,0.0011205482,0.8518243,0.001527471,0.000015446894,0.000026681164,0.000029074068,0.10026003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68414193,0.023537228,0.0011057981,0.2420448,0.0035556995,0.00007554855,0.000037787304,0.00006540147,0.04543579],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.991015,0.00368497,0.00033995498,0.0006852985,0.00346646,0.0008083168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98032856,0.012921868,0.0011899268,0.0007352985,0.0037015805,0.0011228202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013101829,0.00016760432,0.00024682024,0.0011320389,0.0038105387,0.009697896,0.00075809256,0.004272121,0.003456216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019760631,0.00026044677,0.00025009137,0.0009828995,0.014646317,0.00652384,0.0021468122,0.008058949,0.00084167015],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007525813,0.00010142871,0.0039244615,0.00019802139,0.000024894467,0.0000771359,0.006125785,0.00032342927,0.0003154156,0.7639162,0.14676087,0.078157164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003877411,0.00012341757,0.008553726,0.000955655,0.000021418182,0.00016729749,0.010927634,0.0003892897,0.00081861165,0.14194717,0.83600634,0.000050719875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006479521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006377957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013101829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062898872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00547663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06928992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972175885","doi":"10.1177/0886368706288211","title":"An Organizational Flexibility Framework for Compensation and Job Security Negotiations","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Compensation & Benefits Review","topic":"Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Flexibility (engineering); Job security; Business; Compensation (psychology); Process management; Public relations; Labour economics; Knowledge management; Computer science; Work (physics); Management; Economics; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.026338607850972494,"score_gpt":0.2673349605328416,"score_spread":0.2409963526818691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972175885","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024970448,0.0033662922,0.50961035,0.01916896,0.00039445877,0.00041547924,0.00014625028,0.00019821773,0.44172952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9007251,0.00075362925,0.07473029,0.00091764395,0.00030174837,0.00071444234,0.000098836266,0.000069698945,0.02168848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.987118,0.007610751,0.00058876025,0.0009285335,0.0019410977,0.001812872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99037105,0.0056146896,0.0009041416,0.0013026712,0.0011693763,0.0006380767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01132567,0.0007623931,0.0007288998,0.0029938975,0.004908218,0.011324128,0.0031876643,0.005260867,0.011579541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01661216,0.0007764931,0.0015803175,0.0028597887,0.012789778,0.010241209,0.0038876035,0.0036502574,0.0013595764],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004535039,0.000008077321,0.00005544724,0.000009313952,0.000003034897,0.000019542244,0.0003362691,0.001351557,0.000035267876,0.9951792,0.0003985422,0.0025992305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016428468,0.000013782905,0.00030106716,0.0000444868,0.00000818173,0.000039782895,0.00068729505,0.0055162758,0.00007943467,0.9782325,0.015041799,0.000018976996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070715584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057022865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011579541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066001653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00687519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05989659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974072702","doi":"10.1177/088636802237147","title":"Self-Directed Brokerage Accounts:A First Look at Participant Investment Behavior","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Compensation & Benefits Review","topic":"Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Demographics; Tracking (education); Investment (military); Quarter (Canadian coin); Plan (archaeology); Business; Investment banking; Actuarial science; Finance; Economics; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.0652340611083993,"score_gpt":0.24922883286924516,"score_spread":0.18399477176084586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974072702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9907725,0.00031191512,0.00026151937,0.00045069883,0.00001183531,0.00006156328,0.00050440384,0.000017481732,0.0076081734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917537,0.00038288138,0.0006500516,0.00017532731,0.000023500159,0.000086179825,0.0006258139,0.000011124365,0.0062912516],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984237,0.0007639706,0.00014449848,0.00011424821,0.00039679089,0.00015678043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98947173,0.0041990345,0.0026526377,0.00045355453,0.0022817694,0.0009411847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030533702,0.00014642123,0.00024641558,0.0014074356,0.0007619206,0.001183047,0.00026807617,0.00057084294,0.0056841443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010696609,0.00016791416,0.00018528139,0.00091464946,0.0002326043,0.0018095288,0.00076564355,0.00064206566,0.0013980303],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028038118,0.0004764819,0.90234834,0.00009794859,0.000036759702,0.00027117174,0.037970763,0.000038001126,0.0016347902,0.0006495033,0.0028280416,0.05336782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016415945,0.00069807435,0.9311486,0.00010069324,0.0000325068,0.00088508584,0.048571233,0.00050156703,0.0009854223,0.00047988587,0.01654144,0.000039071336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030343626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005334057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056841443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002872791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032416996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019015312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993927775","doi":"10.1177/0886368704274446","title":"Opportunity Knocks: Perceptions of Fairness in Employee Benefits","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Compensation & Benefits Review","topic":"Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive justice; Procedural justice; Equity (law); Perception; Business; Organizational justice; Public relations; Equity theory; Economic Justice; Employee benefits; Interactional justice; Job satisfaction; Psychology; Marketing; Social psychology; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.0728453791186846,"score_gpt":0.3011232424994463,"score_spread":0.22827786338076167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993927775","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98285806,0.00053252256,0.0018251922,0.0008731662,0.00003558487,0.00002048134,0.000012671078,0.000008304208,0.013833961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993067,0.000042852353,0.00015106486,0.000054918342,0.000006983129,0.000003892613,0.0000038682924,0.0000011929432,0.00042847468],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939277,0.0026836838,0.00022495068,0.00025353854,0.002275126,0.00063492474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98911417,0.005028803,0.0033268137,0.0003976036,0.0010907063,0.0010420106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005822206,0.00016208089,0.00022840867,0.00075488526,0.0018749973,0.0021409672,0.00028193378,0.0005484189,0.002876932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017841669,0.00015482653,0.00033952767,0.0002400704,0.0018947987,0.0015269418,0.0022593366,0.0009426308,0.00010472098],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014731818,0.0008702796,0.6392215,0.00039941055,0.00038579328,0.00074608217,0.11615419,0.0015762621,0.009075075,0.042861097,0.003986732,0.18325038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007258562,0.0010560425,0.8510434,0.00028427038,0.00015065039,0.0005623007,0.10050024,0.0024519374,0.0021107972,0.015063322,0.02656466,0.00013980654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004952841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070226905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005822206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013834218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010788394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030791163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997605526","doi":"10.1177/0886368703256924","title":"Treatment of Expatriate Tax: A Look at U.S., U.K. and Canadian Practices","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Compensation & Benefits Review","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expatriate; Business; Tax reform; International taxation; State income tax; Indirect tax; Tax avoidance; Value-added tax; Multinational corporation; Liability; Direct tax; Public economics; Labour economics; Double taxation; Economics; Accounting; Finance; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.058355373077908106,"score_gpt":0.28226490171285484,"score_spread":0.22390952863494673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997605526","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2920322,0.20688514,0.0005692236,0.26314065,0.0012571736,0.00015544864,0.0029384918,0.00008603675,0.23293564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75441843,0.17934595,0.000693601,0.028690642,0.0002640023,0.000060687755,0.0011215706,0.000072354145,0.035332754],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956312,0.00038879973,0.00018235602,0.00019609746,0.0019544188,0.0016471619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98929006,0.00055572594,0.0008658617,0.00015169926,0.0071891323,0.0019475202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028339294,0.00026273608,0.0004805633,0.0061706644,0.012124994,0.0057589384,0.0021856418,0.0016543556,0.0044714506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008138138,0.00029356478,0.0005097069,0.01500411,0.0029504322,0.001470175,0.0015117243,0.0022394292,0.00033597174],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002732288,0.00032455672,0.15905002,0.0018624353,0.0001453493,0.0012810766,0.07139449,0.0007510154,0.00067265844,0.10559879,0.29164553,0.36700088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003520956,0.00008596774,0.38628456,0.0018737091,0.000099181896,0.0005221365,0.09196207,0.00021524908,0.0002546847,0.0009874261,0.51753676,0.00014309802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99672204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10730343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10730343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1866017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77854455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002648609","doi":"10.1177/0886368703251169","title":"Executive Compensation: Examining an Old Issue from New Perspectives","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Compensation & Benefits Review","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Executive compensation; Compensation (psychology); Business; Psychology; Executive functions; Accounting; Cognitive psychology; Process management; Social psychology; Cognition; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.1015747962184464,"score_gpt":0.26337801512153014,"score_spread":0.16180321890308375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002648609","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010599386,0.2754672,0.004491265,0.64686775,0.011103993,0.000009969857,0.000058201404,0.000015871718,0.0513863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41952404,0.27826363,0.0040740767,0.14034362,0.14014949,0.00005515853,0.00010290004,0.00010434082,0.017382784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99612963,0.0016105549,0.00021701142,0.00045809938,0.0011869848,0.00039770064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9542369,0.036210977,0.0020108134,0.0011872221,0.004957621,0.0013963996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009847029,0.0004490697,0.0008490769,0.006007558,0.0038303758,0.0144764045,0.0014892479,0.011743854,0.005577685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02174843,0.00041696028,0.0006276969,0.0045153126,0.01922787,0.02749734,0.0021976805,0.011941475,0.0006383653],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000341659,0.000101908554,0.0015018446,0.0004108478,0.000024761419,0.00025451,0.0025161493,0.00029934914,0.00019308513,0.85500306,0.06668586,0.07297448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024935476,0.00005316743,0.0073489654,0.0021567214,0.000050961207,0.00051919,0.006673758,0.00086988014,0.00019419056,0.5078869,0.47417232,0.00004906714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032197698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010697633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0144764045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004696479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00439616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052076697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012194644","doi":"10.1177/0886368705277654","title":"Exploring the Links between Performance Appraisals and Pay Satisfaction","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Compensation & Benefits Review","topic":"Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Job satisfaction; Absenteeism; Business; Compensation (psychology); Turnover; Employee research; Pay for performance; Sample (material); Work (physics); Psychology; Marketing; Organizational commitment; Social psychology; Incentive; Management; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.09582732598592701,"score_gpt":0.27265048242670026,"score_spread":0.17682315644077323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012194644","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98441166,0.0086210985,0.00060821447,0.0006825019,0.00003434615,0.000023996028,0.000104381914,0.000004257159,0.005509523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974679,0.001956375,0.00015022064,0.00006261872,0.000030768104,0.000011431372,0.00009171295,0.0000010918731,0.00022788103],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99721104,0.001681122,0.00019821411,0.000140544,0.0006040218,0.00016507009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9772562,0.015206731,0.0042236587,0.00024867867,0.0025120017,0.0005527392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004175678,0.00016520103,0.00037609128,0.0013551041,0.00029781333,0.0011936591,0.00025005822,0.0002446339,0.0015292226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018520752,0.000111584864,0.0004170078,0.0022044322,0.0003278111,0.0005407288,0.0005093378,0.0005606995,0.00014153073],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001517198,0.00017786727,0.93502545,0.0002819692,0.0003305775,0.0000658696,0.0009129845,0.00018280144,0.00022128786,0.00063777564,0.00032639137,0.061685324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004748587,0.00018881336,0.9974801,0.000068678615,0.00008212765,0.000044593216,0.0008026121,0.0002804607,0.00007959705,0.00028395755,0.00067891495,0.0000053240515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046378975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005405759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046378975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041082525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009990651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022083342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014244959","doi":"10.1177/0886368709334574","title":"A Critical Analysis of Six Practices Underlying Executive Compensation Practices","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Compensation & Benefits Review","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Executive compensation; Business; Compensation (psychology); Psychology; Accounting; Process management; Social psychology","score_opus":0.08451427045892575,"score_gpt":0.34908895915040156,"score_spread":0.2645746886914758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014244959","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49098003,0.008559377,0.048008133,0.19575635,0.0009529329,0.001042547,0.00021868653,0.00019771891,0.25428432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9761086,0.0014866717,0.012971157,0.0034086707,0.00016880702,0.00027292428,0.000038664326,0.000043753716,0.0055007176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9663721,0.014911753,0.0026038038,0.0022790006,0.01115673,0.0026767165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.72279197,0.20025904,0.018062966,0.010634282,0.04532788,0.0029238209],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04676887,0.00032962562,0.00020171126,0.007772744,0.008505321,0.012809119,0.0013431394,0.0029470816,0.0019826593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15571539,0.0003757843,0.00030226307,0.0061913263,0.02000787,0.0085152155,0.0036644796,0.0042319493,0.0001799851],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007122664,0.00007504681,0.015627047,0.00024724682,0.00002111508,0.00047521736,0.11066041,0.00024731096,0.0008444518,0.7793677,0.01040947,0.08195372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006463093,0.00024053732,0.06185051,0.0027448032,0.000091867216,0.000900586,0.27664822,0.0023305132,0.00546443,0.35638207,0.29312092,0.00016096082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009703614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010945728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04676887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014113341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020495962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24734038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014747215","doi":"10.1177/0886368703254644","title":"Restraining Trend in Plan Payments: Disease Management of Six Conditions May be the Key","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Compensation & Benefits Review","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Payment; Plan (archaeology); Disease management; Quarter (Canadian coin); Business; Operations management; Medical expenses; Control (management); Disease; Chronic disease; Actuarial science; Medicine; Finance; Medical emergency; Family medicine; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.15263987640103618,"score_gpt":0.32149458220346616,"score_spread":0.16885470580242998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014747215","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40989718,0.081663124,0.031241523,0.38718766,0.0021495156,0.00043455625,0.0017111491,0.00023555513,0.08547978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.960649,0.016154906,0.005323724,0.007920657,0.0011241668,0.00007707827,0.0005290633,0.000011584106,0.008209769],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987079,0.0005324036,0.00010351022,0.00011540838,0.00035787854,0.00018298584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960885,0.0017253386,0.0011255948,0.00012118434,0.00050720316,0.0004322212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029581392,0.00018460475,0.0004223096,0.000645928,0.00047603235,0.0012462069,0.00042196288,0.0015438566,0.0054584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010164485,0.000092928574,0.00047900673,0.0009899687,0.0003613907,0.0016771595,0.0006621018,0.0011398792,0.0003625583],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053446105,0.00041840516,0.17205693,0.0010450876,0.00021929867,0.00053001015,0.0003193416,0.007750232,0.0012941454,0.073771514,0.053917576,0.68814296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003185027,0.0015293059,0.59815913,0.0017905453,0.00050303986,0.0019018549,0.0016512827,0.024127856,0.00200247,0.10747784,0.2604266,0.00011144271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009009621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012809969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009009621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010860799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031032234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01826024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081331462","doi":"10.1177/0886368715572530","title":"Reflections on the State of Workers’ Compensation and Occupational Health & Safety in the United States and Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Compensation & Benefits Review","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Workers' compensation; State (computer science); Occupational safety and health; Empirical research; Political science; Law; Business; Public relations; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.16211025685818764,"score_gpt":0.3398364110634572,"score_spread":0.17772615420526955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081331462","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031943135,0.12152512,0.00034783722,0.76479846,0.0061646397,0.00005691602,0.00054130197,0.000025603515,0.074597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.554027,0.13373488,0.0010386524,0.25535378,0.004338202,0.000072754934,0.0006025206,0.00006568461,0.05076658],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9783676,0.002538395,0.0011723766,0.0012922866,0.011718015,0.0049113417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9173347,0.0267307,0.0030613984,0.0009019209,0.043927915,0.008043373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017802779,0.00027070128,0.0006043061,0.0045863255,0.016832607,0.019410765,0.002906898,0.006753237,0.0034825671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03156373,0.00050629606,0.0006704636,0.009425888,0.012903784,0.0034909407,0.0023782153,0.008162254,0.00022046022],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001485695,0.00010254761,0.017822161,0.00097448664,0.00007728411,0.0009286045,0.03615103,0.0010235138,0.0007702283,0.26741505,0.5857684,0.088818096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029041135,0.000039415045,0.046220556,0.0017789056,0.000052573167,0.00012835884,0.040357217,0.00032568094,0.0005148682,0.006681975,0.90366536,0.0002061179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9913372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99417144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84345746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15654255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32093626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9782911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099120551","doi":"10.1177/0886368711401868","title":"California’s Public Sector Pension Plans in Perspective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Compensation & Benefits Review","topic":"Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pension; Recession; Public sector; Quarter (Canadian coin); Perspective (graphical); Business; Economics; Accounting; Finance; Geography; Economy","score_opus":0.09022038325826466,"score_gpt":0.2536770878524496,"score_spread":0.16345670459418493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099120551","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016200285,0.33767548,0.0001588914,0.24183986,0.0072087697,0.00004036829,0.0016883492,0.00012599179,0.39506194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2507315,0.41211167,0.000881798,0.075827844,0.010830986,0.00011239079,0.0023608075,0.000071490984,0.24707146],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863225,0.00016830338,0.000071122915,0.00014673329,0.0007216768,0.0002599004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979627,0.0003914329,0.0001570953,0.000057834914,0.0010674262,0.00036348045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002038431,0.0003126635,0.0003757363,0.0017065485,0.0014079469,0.0054450925,0.0007733727,0.0033327865,0.010850501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031763492,0.00025373898,0.0003860119,0.0017640826,0.0005608286,0.0021348118,0.0006226259,0.0032259475,0.0013320746],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052590087,0.00009192767,0.002455243,0.0011549578,0.00003097257,0.00028047562,0.00084644987,0.00038126862,0.00035691136,0.0599982,0.8185128,0.11583819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055230244,0.0000288007,0.0060457266,0.00029457902,0.000013906298,0.00003409817,0.00034669365,0.000021873962,0.000061231025,0.0005927573,0.992547,0.000007773352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23306091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32513243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23306091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006893038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009767457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46340865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116362825","doi":"10.1177/0886368711416434","title":"Women, Private Practice and Billable Hours","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Compensation & Benefits Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; Ontario Medical Association","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Business; Law; Public relations; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.137116248515428,"score_gpt":0.36794592359630873,"score_spread":0.23082967508088073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116362825","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17435646,0.38660878,0.00076679495,0.1959343,0.002596379,0.000069916314,0.00015248047,0.000010133235,0.23950477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86734384,0.09149433,0.00023300145,0.014077055,0.0017555145,0.000046730725,0.000056741406,0.000008937012,0.024983821],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99532264,0.002342169,0.00021976519,0.00034607123,0.0012669731,0.00050236605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881628,0.006892079,0.0026281222,0.00021303905,0.000983703,0.0011202194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004083491,0.000105126295,0.00030920558,0.0010647968,0.0015967503,0.0025766718,0.00052540225,0.0015758278,0.007382894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013705751,0.00010964505,0.00016414163,0.0016306302,0.0037024214,0.0026263727,0.0010721224,0.0010590057,0.00036104958],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019694165,0.00038827572,0.07587087,0.0023342846,0.00011083622,0.0008354402,0.021524623,0.00023813515,0.00035846693,0.39647672,0.07777323,0.4238922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049328635,0.00039889742,0.15361589,0.0052403132,0.000080424375,0.0012235724,0.03806948,0.00009263915,0.00024415873,0.035886444,0.7650597,0.000039104496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0126170805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027379187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0126170805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032022216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044494504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025087297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116845394","doi":"10.1177/0886368709346683","title":"The Evolution of Employee Benefits at the Economical Insurance Group","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Compensation & Benefits Review","topic":"Organizational Downsizing and Restructuring","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Employee benefits; Flexibility (engineering); Business; Workforce; Pension; Work (physics); Control (management); Human resources; Human resource management; Marketing; Economics; Finance; Management; Economic growth","score_opus":0.017102160657854543,"score_gpt":0.21746688744247386,"score_spread":0.2003647267846193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116845394","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10559506,0.27699855,0.009810143,0.06881957,0.0036244597,0.00029145234,0.00021141094,0.0003342655,0.5343151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68851364,0.06785671,0.00680668,0.011655268,0.0031471038,0.0001497196,0.00017003795,0.00010501892,0.22159575],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99612975,0.0007977168,0.00014006063,0.00040085372,0.002165715,0.0003659314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976162,0.0006197331,0.00022026298,0.00011856454,0.0010821456,0.000343196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052376417,0.00017731247,0.00020205948,0.0024482775,0.001436211,0.0038473727,0.0007055374,0.0023567316,0.0030837054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039050295,0.00028085316,0.00030052094,0.0010788933,0.0011803781,0.0015071078,0.0011201821,0.002062391,0.0007603728],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000913381,0.0002035023,0.0053148908,0.00032418277,0.000027006985,0.00039049957,0.0016830702,0.0009774922,0.0021604763,0.36959872,0.05259656,0.5666323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001043171,0.0001372326,0.0148942,0.00019890726,0.000013317012,0.00017696645,0.00022545875,0.0002677854,0.0006802651,0.0024549009,0.9809154,0.000025149018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020959206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01586481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020959206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051011494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005651314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041674376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144032325","doi":"10.1177/0886368709341860","title":"Pay for Performance—Panacea or Pandora’s Box? Revisiting an Old Debate in the Current Economic Environment","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Compensation & Benefits Review","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Panacea (medicine); Economics; Current (fluid); Public economics; Business; Engineering","score_opus":0.2258718516793867,"score_gpt":0.41508956229201016,"score_spread":0.18921771061262346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144032325","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035346788,0.2644094,0.004872747,0.6998232,0.00776833,0.000009838512,0.00005263543,0.000028414892,0.019500677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3096366,0.4101644,0.006585773,0.21468829,0.04859567,0.00008119434,0.000059687998,0.00010939331,0.010079041],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99449664,0.0025524676,0.00024436266,0.00078930974,0.0016283133,0.00028888456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97450817,0.019686574,0.0012331635,0.0009076659,0.002928516,0.00073587964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018774256,0.0005326249,0.0016563375,0.0016969797,0.0021853766,0.0070010438,0.0019528545,0.0076268236,0.0052470863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029595777,0.00026787943,0.00050952134,0.0022501743,0.015783984,0.013639151,0.0022209964,0.011242244,0.0009050739],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015063389,0.00005561927,0.0006957988,0.0010464704,0.000093469,0.00008724525,0.00051488646,0.00042746222,0.00025345312,0.729038,0.0664021,0.20123485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047203506,0.000086334636,0.0017504836,0.0026476737,0.00006940458,0.00012363635,0.0010210174,0.0006418566,0.00016573681,0.6024366,0.39096978,0.0000402001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031154496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045674946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018774256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024966968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046769143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09928894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147458801","doi":"10.1177/0886368707302528","title":"The Motivational Properties of Tangible Incentives","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Compensation & Benefits Review","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Business; Marketing; Public economics; Microeconomics; Economics","score_opus":0.23361074051291872,"score_gpt":0.3968952069892371,"score_spread":0.16328446647631836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147458801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46739203,0.008118759,0.0656293,0.039098408,0.00063676183,0.00092642417,0.0004513578,0.00012627985,0.41762075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860924,0.0014923133,0.005322789,0.0012241836,0.00022723884,0.00021347115,0.00003782304,0.0000118641055,0.005378018],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966719,0.0019718683,0.00011983328,0.00018772908,0.00078306126,0.0002654701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.950264,0.03780922,0.006556111,0.0017014397,0.0022026615,0.0014666495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077298377,0.00031030388,0.00032565556,0.00096505595,0.00087791146,0.0021502185,0.00040554014,0.0011957814,0.013989741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0437322,0.00027206252,0.00041491073,0.0004742725,0.0025528446,0.0017342791,0.0011682198,0.0015162728,0.0006802204],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00080835196,0.0009970902,0.02459135,0.0014806523,0.00017110175,0.00019360967,0.0012315884,0.003159898,0.003035632,0.73670435,0.00523656,0.22238965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005162159,0.0024278746,0.11707532,0.0013190726,0.000339255,0.00064260646,0.0019518869,0.010831558,0.0039141667,0.79533195,0.06552137,0.00012862122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006975197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012017008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013989741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008805002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012827318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046800375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169334608","doi":"10.1177/08863680122098513","title":"People, Competencies and Performance: Clarifying Means and Ends","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Compensation & Benefits Review","topic":"Quality and Supply Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"PricewaterhouseCoopers (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Core competency; Performance measurement; Explanatory power; Quality (philosophy); Core (optical fiber); Power (physics); Knowledge management; Performance management; Process management; Business; Psychology; Marketing; Computer science","score_opus":0.04844232443709393,"score_gpt":0.2489675246075652,"score_spread":0.20052520017047126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169334608","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016120825,0.19571985,0.14643677,0.2654348,0.0067216824,0.00023536138,0.00016932539,0.00017715481,0.36898428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6858543,0.10596929,0.12605771,0.034324482,0.004989505,0.0011261434,0.00027355814,0.00024287205,0.041162077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98407584,0.011641839,0.00080998865,0.00082018704,0.0018068956,0.0008451108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98736924,0.008996358,0.0010627382,0.00064942334,0.0014285317,0.0004936954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017438047,0.0015043641,0.001236773,0.005085651,0.0056329546,0.019026304,0.0019209719,0.0074478895,0.0028879617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013198516,0.0006380569,0.000541352,0.0037940936,0.055516154,0.03261185,0.0083373785,0.008691897,0.000798448],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005228551,0.000004114784,0.00012481684,0.00007941283,0.0000027549586,0.000037044156,0.005863045,0.000079938945,0.00003062458,0.9855849,0.0019707165,0.006217452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055365476,0.000016682628,0.00039624132,0.0005630361,0.000005290084,0.000066522225,0.0072385785,0.00020608913,0.0000936545,0.8598026,0.13159011,0.000015647402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00868095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009342155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019026304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008397644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00857277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09222227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257490621","doi":"10.1177/0886368715598197","title":"A Global Study of Pay Preferences and Employee Characteristics","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Compensation & Benefits Review","topic":"Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Transparency (behavior); Business; Demographic economics; Willingness to pay; Work (physics); Pay for performance; Marketing; Labour economics; Economics; Economic growth; Political science; Health care","score_opus":0.0706064006265143,"score_gpt":0.2895876562913711,"score_spread":0.21898125566485682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257490621","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9872168,0.0045500183,0.00036692875,0.00018676104,0.0000152473895,0.000010746074,0.00036315588,0.0000043232044,0.0072858874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99706084,0.0018258077,0.00012723857,0.0000633011,0.000025601848,0.000008631832,0.0002891376,0.0000026294863,0.0005969644],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949265,0.00021416985,0.00004130305,0.00008071905,0.000108192275,0.000062877305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99711585,0.0010624966,0.0011025814,0.0001219473,0.00035000851,0.00024706445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011675395,0.00013311174,0.0002686357,0.0015950637,0.00023099426,0.0004965466,0.00010509191,0.00019628536,0.0022869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002559528,0.00006531343,0.00029806443,0.0034009232,0.00024466024,0.00057770696,0.00043814583,0.00027767307,0.00031576757],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005075346,0.000028361172,0.9653147,0.00011678268,0.00013147171,0.000037757294,0.0006090965,0.000102344675,0.00026676507,0.00025622247,0.00038339559,0.032702312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001009422,0.000049630864,0.998019,0.000022370043,0.000019037605,0.00008608391,0.0006098248,0.000028015831,0.000033107885,0.000053359607,0.0010762758,0.0000022342783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015849657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002740809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0022869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013552867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019420557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0076504946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889990271","doi":"10.1177/0886368718798423","title":"Business Strategy, Compensation Policy and Innovation Performance: A Behavioral Perspective","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Compensation & Benefits Review","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Profit sharing; Business; Compensation (psychology); Sample (material); Perspective (graphical); Marketing; Industrial organization; Profit (economics); Economics; Microeconomics; Psychology","score_opus":0.088340385297124,"score_gpt":0.3175884145528209,"score_spread":0.22924802925569687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889990271","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75416076,0.03965418,0.0065481164,0.052861113,0.00018276666,0.000112147995,0.00022445637,0.00001769199,0.14623876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99220884,0.004906707,0.00043394222,0.0010203031,0.00006974718,0.000015257774,0.000029797926,0.0000017979775,0.0013134874],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980597,0.0009677367,0.00007760155,0.00013445556,0.00043631086,0.00032418367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99237627,0.004067929,0.0020687399,0.00017273576,0.00087128824,0.0004431109],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028630856,0.00020342735,0.0002768697,0.0019332875,0.00063931633,0.0031850894,0.00034680782,0.0013616366,0.002267497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00787784,0.000089587455,0.00020735849,0.0016339646,0.0020069946,0.001462761,0.00060766056,0.0009210943,0.00018055162],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014899822,0.0011779533,0.4631501,0.0006751211,0.00033507755,0.00024343145,0.004739722,0.004123571,0.0016794448,0.3682819,0.0036835726,0.15176116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004545735,0.00068309566,0.8226611,0.00087917224,0.00019475904,0.00022745653,0.018682906,0.0050418777,0.0011473827,0.09458141,0.055786353,0.000069063906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020894397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023546528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020894397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026911537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00462614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04154557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2938944826","doi":"10.1177/0886368719840515","title":"The Power of Workplace Rewards: Using Self-Determination Theory to Understand Why Reward Satisfaction Matters for Workers Around the World","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Compensation & Benefits Review","topic":"Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports","field":"Psychology","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Job satisfaction; Autonomy; Loyalty; Multinational corporation; Psychology; Competence (human resources); Social psychology; Explanatory power; Affective events theory; Power (physics); Self-determination theory; Job performance; Job attitude; Marketing; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.055362616010307376,"score_gpt":0.3408912296580404,"score_spread":0.285528613647733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2938944826","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85317224,0.06449219,0.032431122,0.023706311,0.0003548973,0.00013305336,0.00004836382,0.00002281634,0.025638979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927499,0.0047823465,0.0016817731,0.0004249221,0.00006286886,0.000038585946,0.000009476928,0.0000026797904,0.00024741876],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976279,0.0016837844,0.000075629185,0.0001857784,0.00029153828,0.00013538926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923713,0.0051567936,0.0012656352,0.00024012783,0.0005332117,0.00043284742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061465944,0.00031927816,0.0005657508,0.0013574712,0.0008593967,0.0027807436,0.00067199057,0.0007763237,0.0007086047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011954709,0.00022296375,0.0004792543,0.0010330869,0.0034638764,0.0025039574,0.0014793025,0.0015881774,0.00007035282],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018850014,0.0007486804,0.3343104,0.0018327954,0.0005551789,0.0005814611,0.044885043,0.003983231,0.0009045466,0.22059965,0.0021440766,0.38926637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000085744854,0.0011225434,0.51666135,0.0042929314,0.00043042112,0.00069356395,0.042173613,0.0151719805,0.0010163564,0.39078534,0.0273947,0.00017146164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027324972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040717483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061465944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00113211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028547295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032506704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2987534723","doi":"10.1177/0886368719881278","title":"Revisiting the Use of Cash Rewards in the Workplace: Evidence of Their Differential Impact on Employees’ Experiences in Three Samples Using Self-Determination Theory","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Compensation & Benefits Review","topic":"Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Concordia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Cash; Meaning (existential); Psychology; Variety (cybernetics); Set (abstract data type); Relevance (law); Social psychology; Perception; Empirical evidence; Quality (philosophy); Empirical research; Marketing; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.15292213929151313,"score_gpt":0.3710184715678003,"score_spread":0.2180963322762872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2987534723","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966371,0.002616879,0.00012610752,0.00010387884,0.000012367574,0.000014984059,0.000009765082,5.430214e-7,0.0004783403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982293,0.0014226142,0.00011623363,0.000057491223,0.0000101838295,0.000019843099,0.000019774223,8.8795844e-7,0.00012363239],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979194,0.0010189965,0.0001491858,0.00015199046,0.00057318714,0.0001873216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957703,0.002304366,0.0010951221,0.00014074774,0.00046448922,0.00022491594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00434999,0.00016671079,0.00039060312,0.0010015897,0.00080120086,0.0014964958,0.00039746708,0.00036291356,0.0005964288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007924368,0.0001440714,0.00037529672,0.00092065387,0.0008856892,0.00066624535,0.0011261345,0.00063716876,0.00006998513],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040594937,0.00090163964,0.7770553,0.0009977248,0.00025733968,0.00030921533,0.071730405,0.00010601907,0.0020830147,0.0012546628,0.00038119647,0.14451762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012093086,0.00041608818,0.95913917,0.00033533925,0.000075362914,0.00017825977,0.037263736,0.000088284796,0.00036723944,0.0003133794,0.0017920271,0.000018986904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039893007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060273316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00434999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050429726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010325718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023005247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280600752","doi":"10.1177/08863687221097412","title":"The Effect of Social Security Coverage on U.S. State and Local Government Public Pension Plan Funding","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Compensation & Benefits Review","topic":"Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pension; Social security; De facto; Business; Government (linguistics); Plan (archaeology); State (computer science); Quarter (Canadian coin); Public economics; Finance; Actuarial science; Public administration; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.021124010837511743,"score_gpt":0.23561116900191936,"score_spread":0.2144871581644076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280600752","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9740656,0.0042252983,0.00009693873,0.003016504,0.000058373935,0.000021373413,0.0020088903,0.000018192637,0.016488813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957152,0.0010500636,0.000052641604,0.00015559516,0.000054487882,0.0000105550425,0.0008657194,0.000006881659,0.0020889034],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758434,0.0007192256,0.00012769848,0.00018153581,0.0007907327,0.00059650984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97755116,0.0070079966,0.009831738,0.00059091265,0.0028355045,0.0021826425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031789488,0.000115677954,0.00021238108,0.0018712692,0.0004424255,0.0015564524,0.00056083367,0.0005064013,0.005175911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022295611,0.00011846038,0.00043824167,0.0022918056,0.00046800546,0.0007556878,0.0011277534,0.0007023688,0.00053675607],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024734702,0.00011106524,0.9324046,0.00010091237,0.00014580105,0.00019773933,0.0008160299,0.00092105794,0.00025816055,0.003054679,0.008841712,0.052900862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055605374,0.000051919673,0.9941896,0.00008326068,0.00003835728,0.000044804874,0.00058207504,0.00024081572,0.00010873063,0.00010075984,0.0045496677,0.0000045911224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08762148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.112675086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08762148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019546035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019579476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17422295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387781880","doi":"10.1177/08863687231204711","title":"The Impact of Linking Three Different Incentive Methods to Specific, Challenging Goals","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Compensation & Benefits Review","topic":"Environmental Sustainability in Business","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Task (project management); Perception; Persistence (discontinuity); Psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Engineering","score_opus":0.06300212662538382,"score_gpt":0.3380437215167259,"score_spread":0.27504159489134206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387781880","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99178314,0.00038764492,0.0029129959,0.00018247073,0.00004599753,0.0004394352,0.00005340419,0.00003434211,0.004160616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863689,0.00039900892,0.0113066975,0.00010141885,0.000025118805,0.00058929273,0.00006696668,0.000011809695,0.0011307349],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99239,0.004844783,0.000635877,0.0006396486,0.0012110854,0.00027861845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9471386,0.038844343,0.007232074,0.0025090617,0.0017223638,0.0025534658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009711241,0.0004335482,0.0004996367,0.0008765641,0.00058347144,0.001744022,0.0010794094,0.00095907407,0.0033416902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04410202,0.00034231937,0.00049755553,0.00060312997,0.00085874065,0.00082226563,0.0016916575,0.0011385985,0.00028871957],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.034180846,0.053390224,0.18325482,0.005385445,0.001796754,0.0002253975,0.004987111,0.012988831,0.052506533,0.021878595,0.001144651,0.62826085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006602187,0.07734169,0.8151254,0.00094136083,0.0025101807,0.00024162074,0.0032979045,0.02128703,0.038353253,0.019973008,0.013872818,0.00045352633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00093790825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012798577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009711241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010609663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013691735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05135852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401933035","doi":"10.1177/08863687241275237","title":"Nonprofit Chief Executive Compensation: Implications of Board Governance Activities","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Compensation & Benefits Review","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Executive compensation; Corporate governance; Business; Accounting; Compensation (psychology); Executive director; Management; Finance; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.11647187734299481,"score_gpt":0.33494915096607975,"score_spread":0.21847727362308494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401933035","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934788,0.00043166184,0.00021056326,0.00087855593,0.0000130334665,0.000018375122,0.00023415593,0.0000022421673,0.004732652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99947006,0.0000643216,0.000037996135,0.00004442372,0.000011992226,0.000008506527,0.00008779881,7.1969407e-7,0.00027417552],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99469817,0.0025058114,0.00033869807,0.0005904273,0.0010702764,0.0007966114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97799975,0.006512304,0.010738111,0.0006194425,0.0018781576,0.0022522388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044439305,0.00013143437,0.00019980341,0.0013986169,0.000854508,0.001136968,0.0004427776,0.00027209363,0.0025243931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019609097,0.00007891867,0.00014063317,0.0016343015,0.00055072625,0.00080241007,0.0010003438,0.00047365317,0.00018918669],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024506317,0.00004184921,0.9897008,0.000016039281,0.000017037697,0.00003034241,0.0018737655,0.00006149839,0.000079410696,0.00066717726,0.00035104586,0.007136624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016796217,0.000020197725,0.9953577,0.00001898992,0.0000041254334,0.00001766224,0.00343334,0.000119340766,0.000049220886,0.00020961722,0.00076653407,0.0000016007006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017900756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04676628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017900756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011052529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012719502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035593152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}