{"meta":{"query_hash":"6be888368452","filters":{"venue":"Concurrences Review"},"cohort_total":40,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":40,"exported":40,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/6be888368452","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Concurrences+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W2787912529","doi":"","title":"Canada: The Quebec Court of Appeal rules that indirect purchasers have standing to sue in class action (Option Consommateurs/Infineon Technologies)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Class action; Cartel; Political science; Law; Humanities; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Art; Mathematics; Incentive; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.09889680534175178,"score_gpt":0.35897680196919973,"score_spread":0.26007999662744796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787912529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4759697,0.3447712,0.0005369383,0.0777995,0.004881518,0.004757903,0.0003012778,0.00031548,0.0906665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95944387,0.039505824,0.000010512959,0.00053868094,0.00006489079,0.00002636898,0.000009662114,0.0000047650096,0.0003954128],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985718,0.00030950658,0.0002920982,0.0001344402,0.00041990017,0.0002722406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925804,0.00022535288,0.0002353384,0.00012625857,0.00009283788,0.00006219646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013838783,0.00010470723,0.00024393851,0.00006232711,0.00013986991,0.00003336523,0.00036959985,0.000045413137,0.000079634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006097067,0.00007498847,0.000046957113,0.00022380179,0.00023596529,0.0002793804,0.00004496584,0.00017501837,0.00001815821],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026307562,0.00008629085,0.04198928,0.00081018737,0.000063174164,0.0000066112266,0.002972748,0.000013125222,0.0001482465,0.44122678,0.021458186,0.49119908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007531013,0.0000139255035,0.0042118975,0.0014883517,0.000018094233,8.7680644e-7,0.0030512935,0.000019997071,0.00018868306,0.000052157207,0.99076575,0.00011364133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31139556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8339815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9693076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035456766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046754195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6931899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788111627","doi":"","title":"Canada : The Canadian Supreme Court rules that efficiency defence applies to mergers even if gains in effeciency are insignificant (Tervita)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.08456815733846582,"score_gpt":0.32599039091983883,"score_spread":0.24142223358137302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788111627","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12232166,0.3778691,0.00006745045,0.40795344,0.004725183,0.0082422495,0.0026683223,0.00010675708,0.07604584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97440684,0.010741972,0.000013750336,0.014096308,0.00012284923,0.00016302438,0.000006534786,0.000009415542,0.00043930512],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969883,0.00041758912,0.0003685437,0.00041891425,0.0009289573,0.00087767205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979496,0.00026905077,0.0002110629,0.00038616496,0.00015700421,0.0010270961],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018374136,0.00022596607,0.0004276148,0.000089202076,0.00058830297,0.000121285295,0.0013030691,0.00006776103,0.00010238565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016794286,0.00017409516,0.00007544165,0.0010851298,0.00046901248,0.00017938101,0.000058629314,0.0002392625,0.00008643601],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004032045,0.000028171511,0.02453024,0.00046983716,0.00001654048,0.00008349281,0.012775193,0.00011260798,0.0000018150663,0.01940103,0.9026562,0.03992085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000079880076,0.000017972146,0.016454265,0.0013438904,0.000015732314,0.0000013912302,0.001515253,0.00002117987,0.0000029783432,0.00018441788,0.98007834,0.00028467708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99841696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8520852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013726316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0134436125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99214923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788455040","doi":"","title":"Canada: The Competition Tribunal approves the consent agreement concerning two multinational cement's merger (Holcim)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Multinational corporation; Business; Competition (biology); Tribunal; Law; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.09212824424866749,"score_gpt":0.2954274764711239,"score_spread":0.20329923222245638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788455040","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009845025,0.10043614,0.0012809569,0.26134753,0.008740759,0.004677253,0.000108616805,0.00015690412,0.61340684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8410637,0.0017542167,0.000050695035,0.15418762,0.0011846648,0.00023790137,0.00039855053,0.000011035014,0.0011116258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983984,0.00006771685,0.0004229201,0.00019702197,0.00073115015,0.00018275208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988087,0.00013360678,0.0003894694,0.00015409586,0.0004926525,0.000021507976],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008633715,0.00016037656,0.0001766869,0.000026063268,0.0003045096,0.0001939275,0.00039247453,0.000013318485,0.0012311649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031212973,0.00008701944,0.00007253787,0.00021084912,0.00017316442,0.00038343162,0.00010650352,0.00013479,0.0002281879],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005249539,0.000036389923,0.0005268425,0.00021654897,0.000044709206,0.0000018790571,0.000025538098,0.000059736216,0.000012196797,0.72286934,0.27367923,0.0025223172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040825663,0.000006533856,0.0005607719,0.00046633865,0.00006204519,0.0000024341111,0.00014511033,0.0050963126,0.000008223656,0.00063104223,0.992479,0.00013389155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04187916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050705142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83121866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010973485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047785442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788458234","doi":"","title":"Economic parasitism: The Court of Cassation recalls that the applicant must prove the fault of the parasite (Labrador/RR Donnelley Printing)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fault (geology); Law; Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Geology","score_opus":0.036775110962920965,"score_gpt":0.2617772761752527,"score_spread":0.22500216521233174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788458234","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79871494,0.15482631,0.00010532421,0.025660682,0.0022131808,0.005415822,0.000040825533,0.00004682592,0.012976089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9744497,0.022723863,0.000003562821,0.0020188617,0.000532099,0.00013937021,0.0000070524047,0.000011426796,0.00011405901],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986644,0.00009034901,0.0005047615,0.00019419017,0.0002885911,0.00025771584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99747163,0.00022774251,0.001538619,0.0006462602,0.0001051695,0.000010571819],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015503187,0.0001950717,0.00035033788,0.000014324242,0.0002585381,0.00009023905,0.0009301974,0.000041018247,0.00018999242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000112593916,0.00007566095,0.0002013709,0.00030252815,0.00037721783,0.00044940645,0.00023848173,0.00020185142,0.00009747885],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023931909,0.00015356894,0.22226018,0.0037339663,0.00018880569,8.3044813e-7,0.00090990093,0.000058943402,0.00018291747,0.103120685,0.06875364,0.60061264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018675355,0.00000764336,0.094439894,0.0016209597,0.00023218725,0.000005093431,0.00036983177,0.00031489076,0.00019984345,0.00045022334,0.90198314,0.00018953718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009093391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029553103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8332295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002082435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058863527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3085364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789185397","doi":"","title":"The importance of quantifying non-price effects in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Econometrics","score_opus":0.04403277181517976,"score_gpt":0.26425514717625165,"score_spread":0.2202223753610719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789185397","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14710027,0.7971104,0.00001926823,0.002197559,0.0014374855,0.0005909473,0.000038574733,0.0000043383147,0.051501185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8313457,0.16822013,0.000031409927,0.0002686523,0.00003009337,0.000031047693,0.0000024225608,0.0000042933116,0.000066303975],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881667,0.000013405661,0.0006816761,0.00024132876,0.000028301441,0.00021859536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981206,0.00020255099,0.0010613579,0.00054090354,0.000026545935,0.000048013542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007482952,0.00011616395,0.0005272038,0.000018803223,0.00017817832,0.000055958106,0.00078630954,0.000027457392,0.000035541685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005232937,0.00008661077,0.000081962935,0.000070136666,0.00006532029,0.00019174127,0.000094499,0.0001239351,0.000032216318],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003131412,0.000015081751,0.89915854,0.0022457063,0.000042705473,0.0000075656967,0.000033850465,0.0000012437215,0.000002362785,0.06377887,0.010578667,0.024132255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030145724,0.000030986004,0.77468,0.0024014185,0.0000109866605,0.0000025318734,0.000027657288,0.00015225232,0.00002087424,0.004226709,0.21784006,0.00030504522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11726352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.58222973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68424535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009381455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015740548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8886147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789945070","doi":"","title":"Canada - Class action: The Superior Court of Québec rules that class action applicants can obtain access to the totality of the communications intercepted during the public inquiry (Ultramar ltée)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; False accusation; Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Cartel; Political science; Law; Economics; Mathematics; Philosophy; Epistemology; State (computer science); Collusion","score_opus":0.12089144804366951,"score_gpt":0.3280649907917791,"score_spread":0.20717354274810956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789945070","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44594824,0.016475525,0.00012544608,0.52280295,0.002079405,0.004595671,0.00012100158,0.00008189375,0.007769883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881916,0.006429413,0.0000020964126,0.0044935434,0.00019013391,0.0005043336,0.000021056547,0.000011039486,0.00015679044],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838287,0.00020829502,0.0005116961,0.00021263775,0.00043463448,0.00024985854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975115,0.00023218225,0.0005957289,0.0012376924,0.0003936009,0.000029311304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005200949,0.00019100147,0.00030709687,0.000041435695,0.0008952613,0.00036634854,0.0023703268,0.000042534968,0.00057434046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002493173,0.00008831518,0.00016410778,0.00084702455,0.0005719661,0.0006793277,0.00066941074,0.00032585123,0.000029800907],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001794982,0.0003155066,0.04880307,0.0053368253,0.00047590857,3.705901e-7,0.00073766895,0.000056724773,0.00048494968,0.024566438,0.39677253,0.522432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000079427424,0.000002652378,0.11472847,0.00050595356,0.00010026016,0.0000031424993,0.0028672202,0.00040395916,0.000021295764,0.000022753347,0.8811524,0.00011245341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48562482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8512947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54224336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018091641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054518104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6885717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790104348","doi":"","title":"Merger - Application for rescission : The Canadian Competition Tribunal indicates how third parties may apply to vary or rescind a merger consent agreement (Kobo)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Rescission; Competition (biology); Business; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.11363295713675592,"score_gpt":0.3696058846930263,"score_spread":0.2559729275562704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790104348","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0057212044,0.07636374,0.008480235,0.81695837,0.003762846,0.026180396,0.00027465477,0.00028829405,0.061970238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97116065,0.015129966,0.00036507836,0.007459129,0.0005260008,0.0017767566,0.000080516584,0.000017085633,0.0034847916],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972054,0.000806973,0.0004343879,0.00042298323,0.00059558544,0.00053467666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979865,0.00075368915,0.00023680468,0.00032587082,0.00034281716,0.0003543257],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035631172,0.0002052276,0.00038203067,0.000086674154,0.0015356566,0.00017906487,0.0006600098,0.00010026324,0.0009204912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025500627,0.00011636659,0.0001258362,0.0005846331,0.0005360933,0.00014587508,0.00006228094,0.00017720574,0.00036687244],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008738426,0.00007083371,0.00026219862,0.0011879131,0.00006622811,0.0000011454497,0.006403865,0.000006865221,0.00028540863,0.10069505,0.66395533,0.2269778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011033241,0.00012598615,0.00010365396,0.0011715188,0.00006809987,9.5106486e-7,0.0004436104,0.00014896182,0.00015431258,0.00050818623,0.9969516,0.00021280853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025648711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38112065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9654395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002333002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010847882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790333861","doi":"","title":"Cartel - Class action : The Canada Supreme Court confirms that indirect purchasers have standing to sue in class action (Infineon Technologies / Option consommateurs)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Cartel; Class action; Supreme court; Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Economics; Mathematics; Computer science; Industrial organization; Collusion; Physics; Artificial intelligence; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.10968883070725906,"score_gpt":0.35445709422499655,"score_spread":0.2447682635177375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790333861","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7021511,0.07352393,0.00038124324,0.1299736,0.0070987744,0.008478267,0.00014847927,0.0006777776,0.077566825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94831854,0.049510356,0.000008010655,0.0010035243,0.00008081686,0.00013451785,0.00001814267,0.000009218678,0.00091689586],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979848,0.00040737036,0.00037317828,0.00029199844,0.0005856293,0.00035699503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989413,0.00029641902,0.00025782073,0.00019777178,0.0002177039,0.00008897904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009448101,0.00017900689,0.00030918454,0.00008992902,0.0003283158,0.00019459076,0.000503007,0.00008237335,0.00032764408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063963357,0.00013202346,0.00006469091,0.00033813962,0.0002729381,0.0005330973,0.00005334612,0.00033491605,0.00007896094],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037493002,0.0000937191,0.019516887,0.0010024648,0.00013584521,0.00003403862,0.0032852022,0.000091660215,0.0011888137,0.087527215,0.102185644,0.784901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013239209,0.0000342564,0.0021377255,0.0012361101,0.00002185521,0.0000026931575,0.006605057,0.00022619354,0.00035737184,0.00013202128,0.9889101,0.00020422006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15688497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.58655685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8867245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005541209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042397785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84872943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790684833","doi":"","title":"Sheridan Scott (ICN): A Canadian Commissioner for the ICN","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Concurrence; Art","score_opus":0.04707235477100098,"score_gpt":0.2953690758188349,"score_spread":0.24829672104783396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790684833","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00064778666,0.10871697,0.0022752963,0.05081692,0.0035388968,0.0026185298,0.00001931711,0.000111433576,0.83125484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42061058,0.009624502,0.00029281358,0.5610784,0.003438407,0.00024674356,0.00023028233,0.000036173748,0.004442053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921566,0.000005666442,0.00026505938,0.00013774128,0.00016399313,0.00021189779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943805,0.000082052036,0.00012969924,0.00013312993,0.00018820132,0.000028876366],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070414774,0.00010658354,0.00013313982,0.000058800157,0.00028630445,0.00015329289,0.00032066583,0.000024352037,0.0015883382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016724298,0.0000651318,0.00009340087,0.00021955738,0.00006922282,0.00036370385,0.000026943439,0.00007501175,0.0003987475],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034034028,0.000014921581,0.00054739433,0.0006646025,0.000021291291,0.0000018489867,0.000013582124,6.6020993e-7,0.000009643612,0.6414655,0.30608165,0.05117554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000103174774,0.0000042051024,0.0006500725,0.0006298393,0.00003810533,9.538494e-7,0.000021758147,0.0006014755,0.0000065460245,0.00085354724,0.9969867,0.0001036221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006116051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020024013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8268128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028486518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006844423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790816616","doi":"","title":"Rebates: To hell with customers! (New Frontiers of Antitrust, Paris, 13 June 2016)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"Merger and Competition Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"International Air Transport Association","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.024680112182232275,"score_gpt":0.240475568483412,"score_spread":0.21579545630117974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790816616","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00101236,0.9031874,0.030138753,0.005959527,0.0011804588,0.0005148579,0.00019483702,0.00004461043,0.05776722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09148953,0.8684334,0.0015242287,0.0014577897,0.00012217194,0.000041649153,0.000019275822,0.000023621267,0.036888335],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863225,0.00002576059,0.0006919059,0.0003734372,0.0000625542,0.0002140874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989193,0.000029160024,0.0004227094,0.00038288077,0.00006524086,0.00018069542],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035745025,0.00015646934,0.00079424743,0.00017422572,0.000034614717,0.000017422644,0.00031122472,0.000036553403,0.004219304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007837342,0.00010760602,0.00017023762,0.0006222474,0.00007548926,0.00015012921,0.000037274964,0.000053077765,0.0020145234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015396776,0.000064345586,0.04901719,0.0008345438,0.00023735447,0.0000025690415,0.00009443092,0.000004214218,0.000013570214,0.03746775,0.8292971,0.082951486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002225084,0.000063580716,0.0007021505,0.0016952268,0.000046209505,0.0000011127355,0.00001676221,0.000012579561,0.00004085308,0.0005177597,0.9964605,0.00022073455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012311433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027425767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16716337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025702597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99876255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790996897","doi":"","title":"Canada : The Canadian Competition Court pronounces, for the first time, a provisional injuction in a merger case (Parkland Industries)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Political science; Business","score_opus":0.07220222667672974,"score_gpt":0.31886647623516917,"score_spread":0.24666424955843944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790996897","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048135347,0.34337613,0.000025903058,0.48029837,0.0046940367,0.008248844,0.0007960034,0.00004853435,0.15769863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9745889,0.016808594,0.000014021067,0.0049326173,0.00055462087,0.0004107162,0.00004740885,0.000007960691,0.0026351856],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989874,0.00015543004,0.00021263782,0.00013061818,0.00032932157,0.00018460918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991159,0.00027435317,0.00010022458,0.00008140726,0.00033374014,0.00009439217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013954358,0.00007990147,0.0001310747,0.000017984203,0.00085383584,0.000070868395,0.00024705808,0.000022969316,0.00011965442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008874473,0.000043749962,0.000027034386,0.0002445962,0.0002723961,0.00011321924,0.000021580372,0.00012538962,0.000018803992],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005561431,0.000012047748,0.00181177,0.000086894,0.000026507343,0.000022419692,0.0010296846,0.000010712217,3.145913e-8,0.034514554,0.94352823,0.018951558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000878929,0.000017564087,0.00043503236,0.00042245488,0.00001814629,0.000012935618,0.0005162175,0.0001264523,1.0064733e-7,0.000050738145,0.9982449,0.00006756411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9680251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99951714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9697753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040748605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004573993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81140673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791210666","doi":"","title":"Portfolio Effect : The European Commission analyses category management services under conglomerate effects (Procter & Gamble/Gillette)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conglomerate; European commission; Portfolio; Commission; Business; European union; International trade; Finance; Geology","score_opus":0.027775909909490772,"score_gpt":0.3146907071859288,"score_spread":0.28691479727643804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791210666","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015663799,0.28555718,0.00018840896,0.005235584,0.00093230524,0.0020355245,0.0000018607116,0.00038857997,0.6899967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.966336,0.013474679,0.000020406667,0.017074037,0.00093638815,0.00006601171,0.000055343913,0.000026087777,0.002011008],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833065,0.00023942976,0.00043855404,0.00036054637,0.00034069718,0.00029012983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989238,0.00009408769,0.00045452587,0.0003880624,0.000111052046,0.000028473845],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010189931,0.00031547213,0.00042391548,0.00011552777,0.0003013385,0.00042677534,0.0005638673,0.0000301156,0.0009469062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031315176,0.00017913744,0.00016705335,0.0005995708,0.00008131087,0.00076253817,0.00022643952,0.00017759643,0.0025600519],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014511887,0.00010695087,0.0025054787,0.024960691,0.00026445347,0.000057290392,0.00009413039,0.00006200318,0.000160985,0.01819208,0.094575785,0.85900563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032132148,0.000011705475,0.0086439755,0.0030663444,0.00041513873,0.000002655831,0.00004208028,0.00017227726,0.00004138125,0.000051951334,0.9869697,0.000261477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027124572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005919413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9506722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001776649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006399802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791559952","doi":"","title":"Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Competition Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competition law; Intellectual property; Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Competition (biology); Law; Property law; Economics; Business; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Property rights; Monopoly; Market economy","score_opus":0.11100923183440486,"score_gpt":0.3307309600709864,"score_spread":0.21972172823658154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791559952","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018314071,0.3536071,0.0000854162,0.014456229,0.00058067666,0.0018480478,0.000007139014,0.0001890701,0.61091226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88839144,0.092852265,0.000014464148,0.016768295,0.0007237751,0.000031383326,0.000027839313,0.000008731591,0.0011818301],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910325,0.000027904796,0.00018089873,0.0002316479,0.00026802666,0.00018828554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995241,0.00006512533,0.00008807691,0.00014241693,0.00016788591,0.000012391173],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005302648,0.0001072986,0.00020415241,0.000048531325,0.00019370412,0.0001841704,0.00015872066,0.000026031246,0.0005929558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014799906,0.00006501195,0.000035092176,0.00035373034,0.0001585347,0.00043568443,0.00005363358,0.00018047239,0.0009104137],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015937956,0.000059746235,0.000084020015,0.0013546734,0.000004655719,0.000008179781,0.000026161204,2.3561059e-7,0.00005992169,0.43609086,0.09209932,0.4701963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000113315975,0.000059073023,0.00018494646,0.006107619,0.000013227932,0.0000016554516,0.000015513695,0.00005722359,0.000018979292,0.0034401857,0.9898734,0.00011482326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008452169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007934797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8977741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001322493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019259445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792005995","doi":"","title":"Canada : The Competition Tribunal specifies the conditions for the authorization of a private remedy based on a restrictive trade practice (Audatex Canada, ULC / CarProof)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Concurrence; Competition (biology); Political science; Authorization; Humanities; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science; Physics; Computer security","score_opus":0.025996610410376618,"score_gpt":0.3113055597428944,"score_spread":0.2853089493325178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792005995","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010123155,0.010087665,0.0033876344,0.97768885,0.0011595363,0.0033750513,0.00091130956,0.000026940192,0.0032617839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98444104,0.0108261295,0.000033466407,0.0040607913,0.00019918731,0.0001926328,0.000047852893,0.000009784585,0.0001891391],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975959,0.0009024566,0.00038416628,0.0001997518,0.00069968833,0.00021804143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931191,0.005701426,0.0005091207,0.00029124692,0.0003184421,0.000060667175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011162343,0.00012531567,0.00020430858,0.000017683858,0.0010764801,0.00004698828,0.0005562112,0.000028868892,0.00022118192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039352016,0.000055166864,0.000055472752,0.0008023092,0.000518012,0.00016682746,0.000016340804,0.00011963421,0.0000017989889],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014534238,0.000027944347,0.00016100373,0.00013226755,0.00004612077,0.0000011514838,0.00041576952,0.000033224802,0.000015670517,0.86084205,0.13170747,0.006602798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017611883,0.00003070666,0.0027376146,0.0007900527,0.00014911749,8.574589e-7,0.00059566565,0.00007623119,0.000067211804,0.00023708466,0.9950452,0.00009417609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.58154404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9619989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9843398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034437294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005131768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91035366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792565910","doi":"","title":"355.Exploitative abuse: The Canada Federal Court of Appeal overturns the Competition Tribunal's narrow interpretation of abuse of dominant position provisions (Toronto Real Estate Board)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Tribunal; Estate; Real estate; Competition (biology); Position (finance); Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012353132633986953,"score_gpt":0.30222153001981583,"score_spread":0.28986839738582887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792565910","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5826918,0.20415889,0.0051767365,0.05169475,0.0057187695,0.012617684,0.0015714118,0.00009526903,0.1362747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93080693,0.068880774,0.000040112973,0.000101619196,0.000048890503,0.00004200425,0.000029385825,0.000004060293,0.000046208705],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979448,0.0006958587,0.0005484291,0.00014518369,0.00050340197,0.00016235052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979642,0.0006264394,0.0006658548,0.00017366029,0.00052201765,0.000047829173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009263946,0.00011527968,0.00038596286,0.000013117077,0.00048726407,0.000018657134,0.00025302102,0.000031917127,0.000038016617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023241206,0.00006237764,0.00013446569,0.00020520686,0.0006978778,0.0001976003,0.000022318003,0.00009041712,6.3089226e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023424125,0.00046229677,0.0016039566,0.0058508473,0.00050700206,0.0000031463915,0.44731808,0.00038901935,0.00050968287,0.27592427,0.033221353,0.2339761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002282198,0.0015328511,0.025634013,0.023378642,0.0014316615,0.000011083341,0.13237627,0.008110418,0.00043950116,0.0022085428,0.80153435,0.0010604846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35184896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.72049993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.768313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013666607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044074564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65246713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792687319","doi":"","title":"Droit de la concurrence – Aspects théoriques et appliqués, Karounga DIAWARA","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Concurrence; Political science; Physics","score_opus":0.0163113308163146,"score_gpt":0.3070657653018386,"score_spread":0.290754434485524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792687319","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00068215356,0.80350345,0.00212264,0.018394535,0.0021776166,0.0007201558,0.00003490412,0.00022146499,0.17214309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47726822,0.5058548,0.00010542001,0.0068291696,0.0013205853,0.00011983029,0.000025967083,0.00003355531,0.008442474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973459,0.0003351142,0.0006878516,0.00060735864,0.00040524124,0.00061850704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976889,0.00066240964,0.0007967991,0.00041317777,0.00035529505,0.00008345695],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018210968,0.00046101309,0.0007432576,0.00011179549,0.00016037386,0.00059438817,0.0006863682,0.00018837272,0.004648787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001524431,0.00034348882,0.00025226123,0.00062466494,0.0006585327,0.0023568338,0.00021862466,0.00035496778,0.0038630085],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030604206,0.00007216929,0.00284958,0.0058050724,0.000032249296,0.000026604113,0.00006089398,1.7294758e-7,0.00003407697,0.56396216,0.099286646,0.3278673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003500433,0.00002358083,0.0010518708,0.02867684,0.00020212425,0.000014924871,0.00003613514,0.000030137016,0.000036138103,0.011283056,0.9577609,0.00053426484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00083445106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012242464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85847425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000113897644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028171987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792770270","doi":"","title":"Canada: The British Columbia Court of Appeal refuses to rule on a class action of indirect purchasers (Sun-Rype Products/Archer Daniels Midland ; Pro Sys Consultants/Microsoft Corporation )","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Class action; Law; Corporation; Political science; Humanities; Sociology; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.07854447336416934,"score_gpt":0.3345121602147928,"score_spread":0.25596768685062343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792770270","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8882025,0.08533441,0.00005383241,0.009288279,0.0028484445,0.005292245,0.00038376087,0.00008046732,0.008516098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9762891,0.022082578,0.000042100615,0.00041387847,0.00020571158,0.000083509585,0.000026784406,0.000008165509,0.00084817165],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980573,0.00039640712,0.00046621662,0.00022883154,0.0005655755,0.00028566786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841213,0.00019153999,0.00051080936,0.00021892662,0.00053843675,0.00012812842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015499918,0.000106060186,0.0003897088,0.00002139694,0.0004434477,0.00013229882,0.0002963638,0.00006462519,0.00008812897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010545696,0.00010632149,0.000049017828,0.0007312906,0.00029401586,0.0002425795,0.00003573693,0.00014302059,0.0000048476913],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004761449,0.00039411522,0.061965838,0.0041528298,0.00016518352,0.0000039363085,0.005173982,0.0000025526815,0.0020360819,0.0014300027,0.24373873,0.6808891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015470952,0.000103954895,0.012910198,0.0021961227,0.00006677697,0.0000042805814,0.00037848993,0.0000024758692,0.00042998634,0.00001899343,0.98357636,0.00015766473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5812596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8145199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73983765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014420792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015899724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43356645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792802110","doi":"","title":"Competition and Globalization in Developing Economies (New York, October 28, 2016)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"EU Law and Policy Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Competition (biology); Economics; Economy; Economic geography; International trade; Market economy","score_opus":0.09792155532411213,"score_gpt":0.3921115983601588,"score_spread":0.2941900430360467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792802110","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015758917,0.6236074,0.00072619785,0.054612953,0.0010726908,0.0008656852,0.000022011769,0.00007125141,0.30326292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26630342,0.729084,0.0002479057,0.0017005093,0.00030421666,0.000014302445,0.000015561298,0.00000412559,0.0023259588],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923205,0.00013780461,0.00022466993,0.00016017363,0.00009157491,0.00015369791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947965,0.000058582944,0.0002072401,0.00014644605,0.000038034254,0.00007003136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058678654,0.00007677022,0.00024259128,0.000028615574,0.00045668412,0.0001884114,0.00024853143,0.000044474422,0.00029498307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032065785,0.00006959402,0.000040610623,0.000099588986,0.0002399788,0.00035719172,0.0000380853,0.00004469293,0.000071054834],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010248082,0.0000072618604,0.047069296,0.00054825534,0.000018237408,0.0000011078469,0.001427267,5.93643e-7,4.793095e-7,0.745595,0.02180941,0.1835221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000078790494,0.0000040752934,0.008274394,0.002690323,0.000028440605,3.6176792e-7,0.0000692381,0.00000895499,0.0000015959482,0.004397012,0.9843284,0.00011843935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070545576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03122861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.962519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004552122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025810453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792880640","doi":"","title":"Canada : Antitrust Class Actions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Class action; Business; Economics; Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04343123904191945,"score_gpt":0.3401369598745449,"score_spread":0.2967057208326255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792880640","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006690665,0.05250703,0.000021104752,0.0075155604,0.0008012074,0.0001543731,0.00002263248,0.000030019979,0.93827903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9041995,0.067264415,0.000019713165,0.0037758448,0.0005297991,0.00001008721,0.000020491261,0.0000052582955,0.024174912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914646,0.00012486015,0.00017801115,0.00011292239,0.00028660562,0.00015112024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995853,0.00006301874,0.00008284796,0.00007825995,0.00013441115,0.000056188605],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024028441,0.000059423062,0.00011810623,0.000011963953,0.00023073911,0.000047410762,0.00023173935,0.000014633003,0.001928531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013665139,0.00005216343,0.000045902627,0.00016542582,0.00011060346,0.00015141828,0.0000130855315,0.00007940864,0.00012512224],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.9703866e-7,0.000008167352,0.0002612388,0.00005236364,0.0000036367537,0.000003960311,0.000007791713,4.4876555e-7,0.0000035039377,0.739932,0.24571596,0.01401076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026161086,0.0000026129212,0.0009050615,0.00036916122,0.000010591738,5.022228e-7,0.000015636895,0.000008743512,0.0000025741463,0.00013122919,0.99845636,0.000071356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5334699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8432737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9141041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008660744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086131366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99898386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793500892","doi":"","title":"The long crossing to the right of compensation: The Canadian rule for indirect purchasers","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Compensation (psychology); Normative; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Actuarial science; Business; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.061994080708448786,"score_gpt":0.37225255675714825,"score_spread":0.31025847604869944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793500892","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065259524,0.13830024,0.0014544647,0.8068697,0.0011019667,0.005573622,0.0002294181,0.0000388863,0.03990575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869936,0.009783879,0.000035824505,0.0014983045,0.00020829796,0.00029533857,0.0000024662204,0.0000037724253,0.0011784995],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914575,0.0001524464,0.00019862666,0.00010985777,0.00018186345,0.00021145094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865866,0.0007402919,0.00012465232,0.00023201318,0.00015233508,0.000092031],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016778822,0.000056534536,0.000112612026,0.000009433302,0.003293558,0.00017966755,0.000674252,0.000020232806,0.000101266356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050666934,0.00001989747,0.00007411433,0.00027275961,0.0007137102,0.000066397646,0.000027964086,0.00004752765,0.000047409714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.786478e-7,0.000004404877,0.00069958286,0.000067920344,0.000014814256,1.1949204e-7,0.0024392814,8.358698e-7,0.000004486231,0.22072998,0.020350195,0.7556874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028603363,0.0000055155615,0.0012668847,0.00038496632,0.000016354816,2.128979e-7,0.00012935478,0.000003354601,0.000018048737,0.00082904135,0.9972746,0.000043109692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019951984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5587173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9804677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006634225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074062694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793686771","doi":"","title":"Canada: The Competition Tribunal rules that the new price maintenance provision requires resale (Visa Canada et MasterCard International)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"EU Law and Policy Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Competition (biology); Business; Resale price maintenance; Commerce; Industrial organization; International trade; Economics; Political science; Microeconomics; Incentive; Law","score_opus":0.03244855060069882,"score_gpt":0.31416776361735044,"score_spread":0.2817192130166516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793686771","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038193015,0.109653175,0.00019544357,0.7902988,0.0020068716,0.0017079099,0.00017407656,0.000041446827,0.092102975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79879653,0.15807633,0.000059596565,0.02944214,0.00062239147,0.00013200137,0.000079574966,0.0000112288635,0.01278021],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772686,0.0006362959,0.00032237885,0.00021734464,0.0007909891,0.0003061505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984814,0.00060942624,0.00028606335,0.00027315854,0.00022179722,0.00012814366],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009891327,0.00013762154,0.00024581116,0.000014300578,0.0005255184,0.00018293702,0.0009777579,0.000030865882,0.0012164325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065817544,0.00007181986,0.0000915831,0.00026798554,0.00023505988,0.0002775449,0.00008156893,0.00019194135,0.000035817142],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016800982,0.0000058592477,0.00072424795,0.00011516674,0.000046515426,0.000002581234,0.0006796012,0.000003633494,0.0000011070596,0.107296064,0.8209808,0.070142746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052178082,0.0000059133768,0.0019412587,0.0009850399,0.00003984072,0.0000020209918,0.0006525611,0.00003854892,0.000002245943,0.0006602491,0.9955124,0.000107729255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99719894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79497725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030269125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004871383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794181023","doi":"","title":"Access to an infrastructure: The Court of Cassation rules on the conditions for access to a slaughter house (Abattoir de Laval - Privileg...)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07883833413711833,"score_gpt":0.4170953962127321,"score_spread":0.3382570620756138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794181023","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72639954,0.012244457,0.0044485764,0.17234862,0.0024261763,0.011843378,0.0014008883,0.00026021196,0.06862812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98602694,0.0027859316,0.000059975177,0.010151084,0.0004986313,0.00023506857,0.000029825227,0.000012678264,0.00019984768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986245,0.00036341697,0.00030100346,0.00018286037,0.00033258466,0.00019563829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987165,0.00053401594,0.00019185206,0.00020481416,0.00028012437,0.000072697265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096197746,0.000109466906,0.0001787614,0.00003802095,0.00037323384,0.0003282734,0.0011661829,0.000028854907,0.00028018325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007006816,0.00006276356,0.00008932064,0.000236408,0.00019310376,0.000445432,0.00006754647,0.00009477485,0.000032843127],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016549457,0.00007517133,0.002302006,0.00017674475,0.00002990554,0.0000013884062,0.0012002848,0.00010104878,0.00013653109,0.65002525,0.32380956,0.022125565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000086097716,0.00006744764,0.025539067,0.00075913325,0.000041894666,7.600993e-7,0.00006656613,0.000057780577,0.00015002793,0.0041466723,0.9689598,0.00012476326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039720966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015280688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64587855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052806197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018660098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31655478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794734713","doi":"","title":"Canada: The Competition Bureau authorizes a merger in the retail fuel distribution sector following mediation (Parkland)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Political science; Distribution (mathematics); Mediation; Competition law; Welfare economics; Economics; Business; Economy; Humanities; Law; International trade; Monopoly; Market economy; Art","score_opus":0.03723022516186197,"score_gpt":0.24451037875841056,"score_spread":0.20728015359654858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794734713","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23562483,0.4318886,0.0015618195,0.2946015,0.010523119,0.0049887104,0.00029794782,0.00021528217,0.020298164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98504907,0.011485047,0.0000011197992,0.0026740325,0.00047961852,0.00008149768,0.000153891,0.0000048605507,0.000070843445],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989112,0.000062351006,0.00030043628,0.00017478404,0.00036963314,0.00018157485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926883,0.00015067031,0.00030810805,0.00018956116,0.00007573179,0.0000071208397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008664742,0.00012612787,0.00020309356,0.000014109254,0.00013356081,0.000085925596,0.00030433107,0.000025831789,0.00026856535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028874117,0.00005376177,0.000080997896,0.00046987575,0.0000419984,0.0005155419,0.000038125312,0.00008972693,0.000052399377],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022330783,0.00007069629,0.057773933,0.0032868756,0.00007272366,0.00004454082,0.00010864145,0.000001764819,0.00020147614,0.23637617,0.4271183,0.27492255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017249111,0.0000035421444,0.024840495,0.0017684434,0.00006472682,8.57805e-7,0.000041106745,0.00006379777,0.0000010732199,0.00086132216,0.97206175,0.00012036557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056563556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27209878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7494243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006536706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012400132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9497189},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795594000","doi":"","title":"Canada: The Competition Bureau approves the merger of the two largest book retailers in Quebec (Renaud-Bray, Archambault)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Business; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.058367307217837734,"score_gpt":0.3371742987692047,"score_spread":0.27880699155136696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795594000","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01849098,0.59943694,0.000011799234,0.32012725,0.0032955639,0.002397625,0.000062071565,0.000028025937,0.056149717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9219787,0.06523708,0.000009132887,0.007270746,0.00028612226,0.000107490516,0.0000041875946,0.00000686457,0.0050996654],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973256,0.0008389288,0.00035697737,0.00020781776,0.0009445064,0.00032619984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873656,0.0003363126,0.00039137728,0.00029545886,0.00014978311,0.000090533875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022489587,0.0001227392,0.00027513038,0.000008688819,0.00039979967,0.00004736228,0.001182601,0.0000359672,0.000120130324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010184854,0.000054904544,0.00010730604,0.0008313827,0.0013951415,0.00019951307,0.00009893838,0.00022775667,0.000007250141],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056996664,0.00004965498,0.017207835,0.00025907095,0.000027071166,0.0000029019338,0.02024154,0.00003656581,0.00000994105,0.24657507,0.6553019,0.06028274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009012401,0.0000074827462,0.0072161597,0.0007737035,0.000019946088,3.7866113e-7,0.0045660003,0.000024925374,0.000003462733,0.0006707551,0.98652893,0.0000981248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97772026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99689937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90348774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020749016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033528535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5947818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796530268","doi":"","title":"Canada: The Federal Court of Appeal rules that the analysis required for the review of a merger under section 92 of the Competition Act involving the prevention of competition is necessarily forward-looking (Tervita)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Competition (biology); Section (typography); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Competition law; Economics; Business; Monopoly; Advertising; Market economy","score_opus":0.06290219385863227,"score_gpt":0.3078167051415606,"score_spread":0.24491451128292835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796530268","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002442632,0.9877637,0.0004687223,0.006037802,0.00068293884,0.0035699997,0.00010228043,0.00000676326,0.0013433878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007249833,0.9859662,0.000012676268,0.0056817876,0.00024447468,0.0004047566,0.00033273944,0.000017471135,0.00009004672],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966352,0.0004208941,0.0016096062,0.00027376506,0.0008783174,0.00018224076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928555,0.00065610826,0.0049925265,0.0006026152,0.00088394474,0.000009328782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023078476,0.00033970908,0.0013848061,0.000087872315,0.0004362504,0.0000988781,0.0011469256,0.000077401615,0.00044820164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002248375,0.00013183976,0.0013980505,0.00097318494,0.00036380615,0.00042913726,0.00018255418,0.00025249727,0.0000028924728],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011898216,0.00014764268,0.00015649771,0.4772928,0.0046028933,1.2330497e-7,0.00010021992,0.000044638055,0.000010442859,0.31526336,0.04909806,0.15327142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010503107,0.00001308366,0.00024189502,0.12759565,0.0073383832,0.0000015803699,0.00011875482,0.0009304119,0.0000059260547,0.0008135138,0.86267155,0.00016419005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015076799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015321046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81357354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000082621096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042309353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9914819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2798188177","doi":"","title":"Horizontal merger : The Canadian Competition Authority clears under conditions a horizontal merger on the newspapers market (Transcontinental)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Competition (biology); Merger guidelines; Horizontal and vertical; Market definition; Merger control; Business; Horizontal integration; Economics; Advertising; Industrial organization; Market structure; Geography; Marketing; Biology; Ecology; Commission; Finance","score_opus":0.028604152960290147,"score_gpt":0.30339886394446736,"score_spread":0.2747947109841772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2798188177","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029274551,0.024605317,0.000021139005,0.6274696,0.003697954,0.0026413142,0.0014570212,0.00010973705,0.31072336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96730554,0.01162112,0.0000046663436,0.018200293,0.00052083365,0.00011124193,0.000028806813,0.000013139694,0.002194363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99719614,0.001035919,0.00032637006,0.00032529517,0.0005325611,0.0005837213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984623,0.0005160071,0.00017952373,0.0003500256,0.00008616099,0.00040596112],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016750676,0.00021826752,0.00030717562,0.00004443413,0.0022100888,0.00016876837,0.0006687705,0.000102973325,0.0056737014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000514827,0.00013993871,0.00026072285,0.00050092326,0.0010372202,0.00019008394,0.000019671203,0.00041816995,0.00029875754],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030276485,0.000015170059,0.00015138382,0.000056244655,0.000031135303,0.0000020463212,0.000970018,5.5241776e-7,0.000008139872,0.56738436,0.42213032,0.009247583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009474146,0.000045567966,0.0077238223,0.0006404293,0.000059460377,0.0000029001442,0.0006734271,0.000020719048,0.0000019927493,0.00081119634,0.9897121,0.0002136484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5476865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9564106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93803096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032265583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008064969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800019219","doi":"","title":"Conglomerate mergers: Advocate General Tizzano invites the ECJ to dismiss the appeal against the CFI's decision setting aside the Tetra Laval/Sidel decision","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Aside; Appeal; Tetra; Law; Political science; Conglomerate; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Chemistry; Linguistics; Geology","score_opus":0.021103039238525613,"score_gpt":0.28648093563837335,"score_spread":0.2653778963998477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800019219","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2934777,0.43268472,0.0033831354,0.23417875,0.0055527855,0.006708753,0.000028788478,0.00043116204,0.023554193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90985304,0.030081462,0.0001848222,0.05786446,0.0015441838,0.00017645143,0.0000311411,0.0000344315,0.00023003109],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99751043,0.00015387725,0.000762185,0.00044041907,0.0006902723,0.00044279412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975972,0.0007631493,0.00059170765,0.0007426314,0.00026724546,0.00003802208],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024432985,0.00036430638,0.00039501154,0.000068495276,0.0012838958,0.0010785162,0.0014925548,0.00005422783,0.00019008417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017959995,0.00013651644,0.000251416,0.0012152338,0.00027183033,0.0006057336,0.00040461606,0.00039825626,0.0009322031],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016934688,0.000035331774,0.00077489327,0.00029562623,0.00005320492,0.000007418257,0.0006735816,0.0016748474,0.000102546925,0.016978543,0.08633459,0.89305246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023873422,0.000010427481,0.0021566176,0.0026834144,0.00012014309,0.0000029628509,0.00055605,0.000997168,0.000043020176,0.001723407,0.99120784,0.0002602044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006954818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041344189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90487325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032034204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008248344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800849714","doi":"","title":"Canada - Class action: The Superior Court of Quebec authorizes a second class action in the gasoline sector (Jacques/Pétroles Irving)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Class (philosophy); Cartel; Action (physics); Political science; Law; Humanities; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy; State (computer science); Epistemology; Computer science; Incentive; Physics","score_opus":0.042667565044940244,"score_gpt":0.27462597075808864,"score_spread":0.2319584057131484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800849714","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56030005,0.07075782,0.00008838892,0.19514376,0.006749419,0.005414167,0.00007765519,0.00014190891,0.16132683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95025414,0.0030415566,0.000009327357,0.044948135,0.00075381814,0.00018359922,0.000059330683,0.00000910949,0.0007409721],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987507,0.00007464451,0.000456159,0.0001768358,0.00037412113,0.00016757217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910337,0.00011189388,0.00033260896,0.00018832757,0.0002525413,0.000011253565],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041690015,0.00015801085,0.00024822395,0.000049262966,0.00013529295,0.0002025411,0.00041262995,0.000034346787,0.0047584013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000114411596,0.00008840162,0.000081898754,0.00030675638,0.00010483671,0.0008896137,0.000043635435,0.0001865824,0.000084715764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015761394,0.00012645146,0.0033414455,0.004466555,0.000089487534,0.000004612395,0.00013812698,0.000012345278,0.00073075783,0.23690535,0.72448945,0.02967966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015117993,0.000009032467,0.007911458,0.00070040347,0.000039007486,0.0000024980955,0.00029482655,0.001583916,0.0000484483,0.0004188184,0.988716,0.00012438656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41986626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8251141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4052478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007364175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000254814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801263581","doi":"","title":"Canada: John Pecman is appointed as Competition Commissioner","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Concurrence; Political science; Competition (biology); The arts; Humanities; Art; Law","score_opus":0.018567523371866373,"score_gpt":0.2948042057620189,"score_spread":0.27623668239015253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801263581","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009735552,0.0960328,0.0000714233,0.43854976,0.0015455611,0.0020423294,0.000035942765,0.0002221797,0.46052647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9065835,0.057655256,0.00010568578,0.024249028,0.00025086344,0.00006813148,0.000058832153,0.00001739041,0.011011349],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984629,0.00027065605,0.0003143926,0.00021422624,0.0004905366,0.00024727086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902725,0.00009595879,0.00015566274,0.00019222414,0.00029372447,0.0002351903],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025784987,0.00012226161,0.000259175,0.000024836745,0.00040602894,0.000086161126,0.000380363,0.000038663995,0.049343538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033081282,0.00010454893,0.000047921327,0.0006113451,0.00023853143,0.00026081174,0.00003762973,0.00012504299,0.0015652386],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.8870942e-7,0.000017816988,0.0004769116,0.0002821772,0.00001027866,0.0000018601432,0.00045592547,8.154721e-8,0.00000711974,0.1858609,0.7936141,0.019272644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059985246,0.000006791241,0.0010719902,0.0011178438,0.00001949055,0.0000015669252,0.0002131301,0.000005670703,0.000018588073,0.00033038328,0.99700767,0.00014687015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.50521874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28151694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9056099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012695667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013170209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99921215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802287812","doi":"","title":"Canada : The Competition tribunal confirms and strengthens the analytical framework of interpretation and application of the provision on abuse of dominant position in a review (The Toronto Real Estate Board)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Position (finance); Interpretation (philosophy); Competition (biology); Real estate; Tribunal; Estate; Business; Agency (philosophy); Regional science; Political science; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Finance; Social science","score_opus":0.01898332673816714,"score_gpt":0.3533599690517028,"score_spread":0.33437664231353564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802287812","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004274365,0.9925037,0.000024131332,0.0020134493,0.00011262517,0.0019164406,0.00010556387,0.0000018766132,0.0032794566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01032751,0.9893031,0.0000038052415,0.0002062662,0.00003347101,0.000091418035,0.000011774906,0.0000051899947,0.00001748001],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970368,0.0013399543,0.0008499385,0.00020450946,0.00045909753,0.00010969084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996706,0.0016575066,0.001126395,0.00026935537,0.00021489117,0.00002582778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016016968,0.00016715268,0.00080013677,0.000013350765,0.00015896256,0.000014341121,0.00045462867,0.00004556402,0.00001695797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00062285544,0.00006041156,0.00015656685,0.00020731617,0.0008474239,0.000062728766,0.00006286882,0.00018465615,7.405815e-7],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004976927,0.00001627547,0.000010868138,0.011320881,0.000036664074,1.11908435e-7,0.0006129374,6.7200105e-8,9.098863e-8,0.07148088,0.00036291036,0.9161533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045808192,0.000041654042,0.00017467437,0.17847578,0.00033111635,0.0000012583936,0.00015628024,0.000018591718,2.3232165e-7,0.00010954822,0.8205763,0.000068734065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049515657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11395039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9160846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012457403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034704842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9568137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804078537","doi":"","title":"Canada: The Competition Tribunal rules that without exclusion of a competitor there is no abuse of dominant position (Toronto Real Estate Board)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Concurrence; Political science; Estate; Competition (biology); Position (finance); Humanities; Business; Law; Philosophy; Physics; Finance","score_opus":0.01663972533372275,"score_gpt":0.24361494170206882,"score_spread":0.22697521636834608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804078537","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3942573,0.0295141,0.00018935332,0.0101199,0.0027005263,0.0038536435,0.00021360304,0.00006285698,0.5590887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9368252,0.05399195,0.00008826041,0.0083428435,0.0002783416,0.00007556925,0.00019734622,0.000010764619,0.00018972262],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988845,0.00003743914,0.0004126511,0.00014516636,0.00040389315,0.00011637699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987155,0.000043104068,0.000570966,0.00014966469,0.0005082905,0.0000124818525],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002161999,0.00013468238,0.00028595788,0.000020188845,0.00009986923,0.00005443459,0.0002522461,0.000022964783,0.0019799403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022931155,0.00008242137,0.00008671238,0.00007457885,0.00011323927,0.00068854535,0.00004556896,0.000056290522,0.000090599904],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011252897,0.000513286,0.010266337,0.013423885,0.0002504235,0.0000046146397,0.0005433566,0.0000057978887,0.0033497913,0.75275177,0.18894823,0.029830007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007216471,0.000051172257,0.018529149,0.007339669,0.00018055795,0.0000029008954,0.000253635,0.0040660203,0.0004884433,0.0007058514,0.9673427,0.0003182795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39360964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08385801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77839446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059606282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010188367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99893236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901804031","doi":"","title":"Action for annulment – Locus standi: The General Court applies the standing criteria under Art 263(4) TFEU in an action for annulment of a normative act (Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Annulment; Parliament; Tribunal; Law; Normative; Political science; Action (physics); Physics","score_opus":0.25960390387511734,"score_gpt":0.45103725936140276,"score_spread":0.19143335548628543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901804031","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29670507,0.36921602,0.04227744,0.03805507,0.016148634,0.056453124,0.0037674028,0.00040593967,0.17697132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.939082,0.05847618,0.00018896925,0.0006210611,0.00028520974,0.0006929926,0.000028413511,0.0000115738385,0.00061360426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984661,0.00032036053,0.00044386642,0.00020704526,0.00033662227,0.00022605689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887675,0.0002549964,0.00037590967,0.00014184818,0.00030985984,0.000040606104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017412694,0.0001471236,0.00032146194,0.00003911744,0.00044618887,0.00007000537,0.0003614969,0.000029875864,0.000211522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014557678,0.000084021616,0.00012783258,0.00015687569,0.00035041038,0.00043018683,0.00004343741,0.000088396366,0.0000071769855],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006189719,0.0004588161,0.0013468944,0.0027749224,0.0004987535,0.0000012999382,0.09173259,0.000023603845,0.0003007753,0.65156347,0.0748915,0.1757884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080919033,0.0005261261,0.0021030891,0.0016376696,0.00018203718,0.0000010521546,0.02448297,0.00025356587,0.00026883296,0.0051681325,0.9642636,0.00030371462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015984004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033399134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8893721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020876472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011654569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34317693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912733357","doi":"","title":"Burden of proof: The ECJ gives some guidance regarding the burden of proof and behavioural remedies Tetra Laval","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tetra; Burden of proof; Commission; European commission; Law; Proof of concept; Law and economics; Political science; Chemistry; Computer science; Business; Economics; European union; Medicinal chemistry; International trade","score_opus":0.05727250508509614,"score_gpt":0.3396477420296931,"score_spread":0.282375236944597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912733357","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029704913,0.9004812,0.0000029004011,0.032520708,0.00037771527,0.0008929078,0.000023898327,0.000019066278,0.035976693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8229126,0.17452684,0.00004781836,0.00012510199,0.0005810848,0.000024844885,0.0000011063014,0.000004557681,0.0017760918],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985172,0.0003058248,0.00041447085,0.00016422605,0.0004341119,0.00016412324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897,0.00026275645,0.00033137662,0.00015345891,0.00025073942,0.000031698797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012450179,0.000109967594,0.00029905632,0.00001745438,0.00030440517,0.00003135977,0.0005427337,0.000020623342,0.0000523092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00085096346,0.000056237346,0.00009811196,0.00014259617,0.001414945,0.00022129109,0.00012032236,0.00011536732,0.0000050328986],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020618945,0.00008418991,0.008231527,0.0031593128,0.00033249645,0.0000041412095,0.08917509,0.000027336606,0.00038713182,0.27054897,0.062207412,0.56582177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012425172,0.0000724432,0.0012087448,0.0046752524,0.0001107025,0.00000239826,0.0042724973,0.000039739552,0.00034030701,0.00041010167,0.98860025,0.0001433134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045975336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001964115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92639285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017474655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007578001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5213424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948964787","doi":"","title":"L'alternative du commun. Les colloques de Cerisy, Christian LAVAL, Pierre SAUVÊTRE and Ferhat TAYLAN (dir.)","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.042171381536015046,"score_gpt":0.30708600370708805,"score_spread":0.264914622171073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948964787","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013234855,0.92830014,0.000021056485,0.009779392,0.0032537915,0.0008966695,0.0001105721,0.00006122654,0.0443423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23271306,0.75810546,0.000066129,0.00088937586,0.0006404153,0.000045211502,0.000014659942,0.000015628426,0.0075100847],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99676085,0.0011063665,0.00052399316,0.00048126333,0.0004637223,0.00066379894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983434,0.0004860127,0.00039424773,0.00026133592,0.0002276576,0.00028732387],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010491295,0.000409706,0.0010509936,0.000039666593,0.0008871706,0.00019070908,0.0006456179,0.00020512033,0.0026785661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004147438,0.0003728528,0.00023744466,0.00049848104,0.00215777,0.00033645798,0.00026149524,0.0004449608,0.0003015066],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054877114,0.00013011236,0.048400823,0.0048716553,0.00025784937,0.000025375315,0.02652289,9.362758e-7,0.0000033149809,0.061626468,0.28395486,0.5742002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002578875,0.00016260012,0.0032170739,0.008238673,0.0001975578,0.000006268932,0.0042842873,0.00007115333,0.0000030173057,0.0024878178,0.98060936,0.00046432388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042201336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0096698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6966545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000315396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032366687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949835537","doi":"","title":"Spain: The Spanish Supreme Court confirms the right to be heard when there is a change in the legal qualification of the facts at the end of the infringement procedure, but only in case the change can result in the companies being otherwise defenseless (Maderas José Sainz)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"Human Rights and Immigration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Quarter (Canadian coin); History","score_opus":0.12111826841108651,"score_gpt":0.35508501037724693,"score_spread":0.2339667419661604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949835537","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70877,0.018497555,0.0000023891728,0.2623982,0.0003066539,0.0076220133,0.00011692295,0.000010972919,0.0022753275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9787192,0.006376364,0.000001928282,0.013666867,0.00031265616,0.0006630441,0.000005781425,0.000013422325,0.00024077618],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99286735,0.0043954933,0.0008221432,0.00036734133,0.0010782424,0.0004694558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967973,0.0011405442,0.00069769035,0.0010781336,0.00024716655,0.000039143422],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007838164,0.00029769292,0.00042838737,0.000044351294,0.001648696,0.0002601388,0.0024682404,0.00008788733,0.00024734292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004601327,0.000084859654,0.00018409388,0.0009442613,0.0021113881,0.00020999253,0.00020275805,0.0004930348,0.000009031399],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025408697,0.0001214958,0.0064321444,0.00033841713,0.000043701348,0.0000049082905,0.91479963,0.000002397669,0.000026404023,0.05697398,0.0079261195,0.01330542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039684665,0.00015243409,0.067018956,0.003214404,0.0001538447,0.00003708562,0.11128574,0.00010374997,0.00018342891,0.001528008,0.8156018,0.0003236814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0524253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69807374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8076757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001433183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033292003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2987293383","doi":"","title":"US: The US Supreme Court rules that mobile Apps users are direct buyers and have standing to sue the platform that distributes them (Apple / Pepper)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"Sharing Economy and Platforms","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Pepper; Advertising; Quarter (Canadian coin); Business; Mobile apps; Law; Political science; Computer science; History; Computer security; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.05607576218789478,"score_gpt":0.2546043139325502,"score_spread":0.1985285517446554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2987293383","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9048055,0.076520815,0.000039418086,0.0022489645,0.0010114776,0.00288902,0.0002229613,0.00013079858,0.012131088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9749774,0.02159647,0.000010147206,0.0025365073,0.0002657307,0.00021067938,0.00013616456,0.000020796035,0.00024615822],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858856,0.000014690095,0.00030339396,0.0004132989,0.00027082415,0.00040922067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987265,0.000371946,0.00035392566,0.00045080722,0.00006371361,0.000033113603],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010018867,0.00031255293,0.00050849357,0.00004480778,0.00042491595,0.00073730346,0.00069722184,0.00005928229,0.00092407566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010733144,0.00016175625,0.00014605573,0.00022031555,0.00012779665,0.001144574,0.0003179713,0.00021857502,0.0005550926],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018437651,0.000021474636,0.9191231,0.0027464782,0.000107877386,0.0000033374315,0.00028985104,0.000033671487,0.0000021262008,0.002714022,0.030822355,0.04411728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019866027,0.000013034641,0.01563687,0.0030555911,0.00012666083,0.0000058640403,0.0021443916,0.00045372001,0.000017672308,0.00037415,0.97761905,0.00035431905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025068686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020843594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9467967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037018803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022910155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009927053","doi":"","title":"Selective distribution: The Paris Court of Appeal recalls that a restriction on online sales may be appropriate without being necessary (Stihl)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Quarter (Canadian coin); Law; Political science; Continuation; Court decision; Advertising; Business; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.04955893432994275,"score_gpt":0.35096347468368505,"score_spread":0.3014045403537423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3009927053","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33223382,0.18377513,0.0011549592,0.057349786,0.005737181,0.0071273707,0.0010685745,0.00037930897,0.41117388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86464345,0.13317862,0.000017740196,0.0007541628,0.00020431128,0.000014619637,0.00015227597,0.000006985147,0.0010278289],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794555,0.000659081,0.0003584541,0.0002592543,0.00057379587,0.00020389441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870384,0.0003743812,0.00041053165,0.00018771828,0.0002599139,0.00006362772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011329029,0.0001378213,0.000321288,0.000023012284,0.00022269716,0.000053393607,0.00042625968,0.000053781914,0.00014327299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041993993,0.00009043869,0.00012663465,0.0003374161,0.00027980976,0.00022377535,0.000044037315,0.0002774354,0.00008996083],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014073572,0.0004764465,0.07852151,0.0016227281,0.00026859005,0.0000066760826,0.0019736083,0.00002697575,0.00007895132,0.7422913,0.03370246,0.14089008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020067759,0.00013855165,0.012443116,0.0038311256,0.00006917253,0.0000010149704,0.00028408735,0.00012587005,0.000030472054,0.00050066283,0.98220336,0.00017185629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018721232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009694515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94850093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007930633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018020347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3687983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114342144","doi":"","title":"Exclusive distribution: The Paris Court of Appeal holds that the continuation of a commercial relationship, after the non-renewal of an exclusive distribution contract, is not governed by the terms of the non-renewed contract, which include the distributor's exclusive supply obligation (CMS Dental / Septodont)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Quarter (Canadian coin); Distribution (mathematics); High Court; Law; Continuation; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Mathematics; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.028112223662969307,"score_gpt":0.31139274414663193,"score_spread":0.28328052048366265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3114342144","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8246733,0.016191639,0.0022821454,0.13116464,0.0014238309,0.007550669,0.014305657,0.000035494333,0.0023726332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920817,0.0045354106,0.000002331177,0.0019158238,0.00034810384,0.00017147629,0.00085579406,0.000017128643,0.00007222426],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937032,0.0024616956,0.0014218534,0.00040737758,0.0016184236,0.00038747786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99245995,0.0028863638,0.0029909036,0.000726656,0.0008220547,0.00011405093],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024801204,0.00037932722,0.00073556026,0.000014168173,0.0012954946,0.00015689344,0.0022707868,0.00016448721,0.00016879405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017214883,0.00016598725,0.00051994564,0.0008743391,0.0027348262,0.0005509712,0.00041960712,0.000666139,0.0000057923817],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0043299953,0.002152826,0.47198898,0.002172321,0.0027545264,0.000011615364,0.12968025,0.0002653053,0.009850863,0.21946898,0.08083497,0.07648936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027183497,0.0005202761,0.85053,0.0030918813,0.0017500658,0.000012308208,0.007902387,0.0039473767,0.010087595,0.0010051767,0.11772524,0.0007093433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009688539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011420521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37854102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011816451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039221652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162243677","doi":"","title":"Canada: The legal regime of private enforcement - The conditions for success in civil law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université TÉLUQ","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Enforcement; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Private law; Law and economics; Commercial law; Business; Public law; Sociology","score_opus":0.04086764620384174,"score_gpt":0.35159602778185267,"score_spread":0.3107283815780109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162243677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038300136,0.20679702,0.0000700521,0.06961662,0.0015195062,0.0018989423,0.00035495748,0.000015928767,0.71589696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96211076,0.029329315,0.0000036895651,0.006141741,0.00010216847,0.00006105253,0.000022740505,0.0000028683435,0.002225645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989552,0.00026733032,0.00027424618,0.00010210077,0.0002668397,0.00013428883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907,0.00042642799,0.00014389557,0.00013438283,0.0001967028,0.000028573693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007547107,0.00005580906,0.00014684361,0.000005663805,0.00022928082,0.000041726595,0.00041534225,0.000011147971,0.00058080355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043347475,0.00003225314,0.00006486052,0.00017485562,0.00029598858,0.00011310043,0.00003388349,0.00007960429,0.0000036170313],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.8815147e-7,0.0000071838745,0.000044316123,0.00009245563,0.000009541716,0.0000016901486,0.00008468484,0.0000017303312,0.000004292469,0.9873942,0.011332279,0.0010269978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007075649,0.00000625519,0.00018030875,0.0007556194,0.000018101671,4.794104e-7,0.00009788964,0.000016523903,0.000044574772,0.0007322009,0.9980323,0.000045020857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13269967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84418595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005268034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010053983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8730758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213284292","doi":"","title":"Commercial agency: The French Supreme Court clearly confirms the extensive assessment of the commercial agent's power (ATL Location / SWAL / Avis)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Negotiation; Agency (philosophy); Consolidation (business); Law; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Power (physics); Business; Law and economics; History; Economics; Sociology; Accounting; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03954885643621187,"score_gpt":0.30457281874570447,"score_spread":0.2650239623094926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213284292","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11941186,0.090712145,0.0013975876,0.2814945,0.017618438,0.00635592,0.00010588824,0.000169503,0.48273414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.927474,0.0023133364,0.000014166077,0.06917922,0.00048960786,0.000060172646,0.0000784007,0.000010730126,0.0003803395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818796,0.00017772173,0.0005658847,0.00024089991,0.0006351405,0.00019241171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976874,0.00016324162,0.00055691495,0.00043440823,0.001144703,0.000013306528],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007143805,0.00019378765,0.00029327505,0.000025958121,0.00045856406,0.0002330886,0.00075510907,0.000043787422,0.001618575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033962965,0.000098207995,0.00022094182,0.00053197925,0.00035762534,0.00044510118,0.00024032657,0.00028428627,0.0001504091],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061701035,0.00024047427,0.00758771,0.0008863723,0.0001638864,0.000005414115,0.00032682827,0.000013689362,0.00017830725,0.7572825,0.2145836,0.018725064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024318199,0.000014705132,0.21662816,0.0010601204,0.00018754853,0.0000035053554,0.000118648,0.00065721135,0.000028302258,0.0012798063,0.7796075,0.0001713055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030017554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003123818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80806214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003386512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021670738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}