{"meta":{"query_hash":"6be888368452","filters":{"venue":"Concurrences Review"},"cohort_total":40,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":40,"exported":40,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/6be888368452","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Concurrences+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W2787912529","doi":"","title":"Canada: The Quebec Court of Appeal rules that indirect purchasers have standing to sue in class action (Option Consommateurs/Infineon Technologies)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Class action; Cartel; Political science; Law; Humanities; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Art; Mathematics; Incentive; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.09889680534175178,"score_gpt":0.35897680196919973,"score_spread":0.26007999662744796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787912529","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048774615,0.035872806,0.0025320991,0.14196981,0.0037726064,0.0006811345,0.007131533,0.0002835749,0.75898176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34528208,0.015293183,0.0035489467,0.08760023,0.00051385595,0.00043127907,0.0016478428,0.00015325652,0.54552937],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98967147,0.00070129125,0.00039951058,0.000888079,0.005534114,0.002805489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882492,0.0022293176,0.0004234455,0.0004041682,0.0077285557,0.0009653318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057618823,0.00075465447,0.0007642366,0.0030488537,0.018442776,0.010824855,0.0038173252,0.013466115,0.018844936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015827287,0.0012766819,0.0012492036,0.004137038,0.0047409497,0.0022725111,0.0018134578,0.00972747,0.0018110857],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005892222,0.000065818174,0.008313901,0.0003383175,0.00008487123,0.0005649697,0.0041690413,0.0004052113,0.0004892223,0.27898708,0.6719076,0.0346151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000096000105,0.000027055385,0.031289328,0.00097023265,0.00019036504,0.0001759761,0.0041866973,0.0004366449,0.0005780582,0.006104889,0.9557754,0.00016930045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9967428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12401945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12401945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27718008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8998283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788111627","doi":"","title":"Canada : The Canadian Supreme Court rules that efficiency defence applies to mergers even if gains in effeciency are insignificant (Tervita)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.08456815733846582,"score_gpt":0.32599039091983883,"score_spread":0.24142223358137302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788111627","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009972275,0.04272173,0.0040901285,0.24917553,0.004347664,0.00041285434,0.008613371,0.00040931656,0.68025714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31227866,0.029658986,0.0106212385,0.24461263,0.0016742931,0.00044153753,0.0029359409,0.0002914456,0.39748523],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9814144,0.0010792267,0.00072112697,0.0015603268,0.011757988,0.0034668902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859049,0.0021436613,0.00044140473,0.00052692846,0.010255859,0.0007272604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008522058,0.0010283176,0.00097212614,0.0035299587,0.015448047,0.011621256,0.0044568726,0.011955402,0.010912353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023154566,0.0010613939,0.0017524267,0.0058399024,0.006642582,0.0029116771,0.00238023,0.009774373,0.0019359916],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002832722,0.000016768445,0.0015302433,0.00024155068,0.00004755712,0.00014309726,0.0010678349,0.00026088158,0.0003987925,0.3703158,0.60926586,0.016683288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006231142,0.000018100083,0.009713146,0.00084011216,0.00016184562,0.00008359383,0.00078626146,0.0003234519,0.0006217064,0.022059904,0.9651903,0.00013923227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9911273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99527717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10203068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10203068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32810518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7402879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788455040","doi":"","title":"Canada: The Competition Tribunal approves the consent agreement concerning two multinational cement's merger (Holcim)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Multinational corporation; Business; Competition (biology); Tribunal; Law; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.09212824424866749,"score_gpt":0.2954274764711239,"score_spread":0.20329923222245638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788455040","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02886882,0.015463482,0.003361047,0.22571911,0.0072328374,0.0017834085,0.002667819,0.00042331518,0.7144801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18338102,0.006482362,0.0037812614,0.14266492,0.0012973616,0.00047761755,0.0010140047,0.00020251518,0.6606989],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9741052,0.0016282267,0.0012780293,0.0015928571,0.01462542,0.0067702783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828515,0.004178036,0.00041015807,0.00069030497,0.010480164,0.0013897639],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014538838,0.00078294287,0.00080682023,0.0021621224,0.019587466,0.010096009,0.0035767627,0.02940925,0.014334948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030046662,0.0010612387,0.001148016,0.002768183,0.0049614236,0.0023200347,0.002926096,0.014683234,0.0032611566],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000908779,0.0000954559,0.002494204,0.00026682593,0.000044778033,0.0011630263,0.0031030395,0.00027469653,0.0017203657,0.26534307,0.6973974,0.028006235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004364441,0.000036183108,0.0047764257,0.00020416755,0.0000403187,0.00010865637,0.0011475058,0.0002172598,0.001088212,0.004072175,0.98817354,0.00009192062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9300907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95860976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.069909275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.049755994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2626466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36100668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788458234","doi":"","title":"Economic parasitism: The Court of Cassation recalls that the applicant must prove the fault of the parasite (Labrador/RR Donnelley Printing)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fault (geology); Law; Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Geology","score_opus":0.036775110962920965,"score_gpt":0.2617772761752527,"score_spread":0.22500216521233174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788458234","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012302943,0.022319434,0.0012028425,0.5208438,0.011136414,0.00012330257,0.00037172186,0.00017598529,0.43152368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14539532,0.005662968,0.00077152386,0.32175156,0.003314777,0.00019979417,0.00017979513,0.00012486773,0.5225994],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901072,0.0015669422,0.00055976614,0.0016200228,0.0036909564,0.002455061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918241,0.0036584062,0.00036996158,0.00054491276,0.0030741612,0.0005284098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073524667,0.00059057167,0.0007979053,0.0010655193,0.014800627,0.008686406,0.002027664,0.020173425,0.011060351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02203318,0.00071766344,0.0010066393,0.0013178174,0.0054397085,0.0031016674,0.0035869158,0.02186057,0.0046582483],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030836807,0.000012926463,0.0007421947,0.000064624306,0.000015406491,0.00060180895,0.0020302718,0.000059747537,0.00041788004,0.22859386,0.7594372,0.007993236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013469347,0.000023368337,0.0023905258,0.00019273363,0.000027031354,0.00021322665,0.001201954,0.0001137942,0.0005982693,0.00955831,0.9856235,0.000043764972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1720126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28203803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1720126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009127871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019395083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34202272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789185397","doi":"","title":"The importance of quantifying non-price effects in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Econometrics","score_opus":0.04403277181517976,"score_gpt":0.26425514717625165,"score_spread":0.2202223753610719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789185397","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31021544,0.4654568,0.032064725,0.042465076,0.001625125,0.000384163,0.015872782,0.0003793124,0.13153651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8345887,0.13146822,0.010570239,0.0037602917,0.0002756264,0.000073860174,0.0021037846,0.0001413559,0.01701787],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997497,0.0004750815,0.00010977008,0.00033962098,0.0012201184,0.0003583556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99057454,0.0033016973,0.0008844728,0.00028190055,0.0047184145,0.00023891483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037424322,0.00059186824,0.0010903853,0.002432841,0.0010873087,0.0039619487,0.0015076488,0.0008344738,0.0029350787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009815627,0.00026267848,0.0011861523,0.0047158105,0.0014136961,0.0016419041,0.00077750563,0.001391158,0.00016447598],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007244635,0.00027017912,0.15645887,0.005244804,0.004487182,0.00035409737,0.0009095686,0.054340355,0.0031280217,0.122682884,0.033858255,0.6175413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019356215,0.00030296948,0.5174791,0.0038567337,0.004878303,0.0001842989,0.0021725015,0.03267367,0.013337547,0.041673694,0.38289958,0.00034804226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98082674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98601437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038554665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038554665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053323574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27973503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789945070","doi":"","title":"Canada - Class action: The Superior Court of Québec rules that class action applicants can obtain access to the totality of the communications intercepted during the public inquiry (Ultramar ltée)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; False accusation; Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Cartel; Political science; Law; Economics; Mathematics; Philosophy; Epistemology; State (computer science); Collusion","score_opus":0.12089144804366951,"score_gpt":0.3280649907917791,"score_spread":0.20717354274810956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789945070","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052630242,0.007065054,0.005627501,0.104947306,0.0029390093,0.0011105025,0.0037156243,0.0003792124,0.8215856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29977903,0.001802551,0.003479394,0.085248224,0.00040712176,0.0003878118,0.0006658508,0.00011458585,0.60811543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9846675,0.0010892628,0.0006388556,0.0016013448,0.007063511,0.0049393945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863413,0.003343837,0.0004979986,0.0008529077,0.007555191,0.0014088434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008444561,0.000604948,0.0007053894,0.001906866,0.02244994,0.011439124,0.0038646336,0.016993018,0.016948605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016134696,0.00086580904,0.0012833903,0.0023876238,0.0067317607,0.0024836042,0.0030391887,0.010833845,0.0026377724],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008044993,0.00008706131,0.005894083,0.00019397217,0.0000550839,0.00066640176,0.006955337,0.0002548487,0.0016795268,0.504737,0.4528469,0.026549337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007603962,0.00004720786,0.015745202,0.00028933023,0.000089023524,0.0001645502,0.003258265,0.0003876536,0.0014495271,0.008650612,0.9696574,0.00018513796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9853726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9934376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06993192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06993192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17829637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50739396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790104348","doi":"","title":"Merger - Application for rescission : The Canadian Competition Tribunal indicates how third parties may apply to vary or rescind a merger consent agreement (Kobo)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Rescission; Competition (biology); Business; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.11363295713675592,"score_gpt":0.3696058846930263,"score_spread":0.2559729275562704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790104348","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009498458,0.024466103,0.0035152882,0.18454204,0.0068480466,0.0008821308,0.0023481206,0.000543157,0.7673565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.102015845,0.010037566,0.004512749,0.16897315,0.0012796742,0.0005565199,0.0017553753,0.00026394613,0.7106052],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96921366,0.002609078,0.0015604573,0.0022007977,0.017623836,0.00679222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98099446,0.0050984644,0.0004734768,0.000788139,0.011364603,0.0012809271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017293733,0.0010988829,0.00088725943,0.0030597434,0.025976904,0.013811976,0.0047993055,0.026472926,0.018983861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030591292,0.0012950419,0.001429614,0.004905729,0.008743739,0.0050290367,0.005049947,0.016462352,0.006434224],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035282654,0.00003756761,0.00082637393,0.0001237911,0.000011143739,0.00023883925,0.0018691634,0.00012068558,0.0005106759,0.17831133,0.7967709,0.02114425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032744323,0.000032641063,0.0056129643,0.00039153238,0.000030809064,0.00012058694,0.0019001899,0.00024285054,0.0006103178,0.0068858196,0.9840173,0.00012212014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.935632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96921116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06436801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.055504393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22241838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4027145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790333861","doi":"","title":"Cartel - Class action : The Canada Supreme Court confirms that indirect purchasers have standing to sue in class action (Infineon Technologies / Option consommateurs)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Cartel; Class action; Supreme court; Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Economics; Mathematics; Computer science; Industrial organization; Collusion; Physics; Artificial intelligence; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.10968883070725906,"score_gpt":0.35445709422499655,"score_spread":0.2447682635177375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790333861","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.069253676,0.01802116,0.002159749,0.17400387,0.0020715448,0.0003174603,0.0012791685,0.00013545681,0.7327579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5126644,0.011869329,0.0017655842,0.26682752,0.000843216,0.00017647818,0.0007098445,0.000105790576,0.20503795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9829221,0.0008182603,0.0002726412,0.0011388015,0.008628458,0.006219715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894254,0.0035675864,0.000428641,0.0003959362,0.0047759046,0.0014066049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008827328,0.00079973444,0.0009370673,0.00323291,0.026821198,0.016344428,0.0052362853,0.020821244,0.0062721847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016927097,0.0009280571,0.0013616742,0.00367376,0.017534627,0.0031545474,0.0031365885,0.022269895,0.0010547804],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004382102,0.000069161004,0.0051287105,0.00012724404,0.000078259225,0.00073372474,0.006365926,0.00030332245,0.00049963174,0.6912238,0.27689564,0.018530779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013966762,0.000057518264,0.023057733,0.0011943432,0.00036955107,0.00024525108,0.0111410115,0.0007374536,0.002119402,0.03541814,0.92524284,0.00027711454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97836614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99109286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07938523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07938523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18664129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5759828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790684833","doi":"","title":"Sheridan Scott (ICN): A Canadian Commissioner for the ICN","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Concurrence; Art","score_opus":0.04707235477100098,"score_gpt":0.2953690758188349,"score_spread":0.24829672104783396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790684833","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041838307,0.05488221,0.0018837537,0.5937345,0.04257705,0.00083754695,0.0014324045,0.000333058,0.30013567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024954863,0.009775298,0.002051631,0.15624467,0.0031578243,0.00023006329,0.00040984593,0.00022912242,0.8029467],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9840052,0.0008035739,0.0005860253,0.0014990048,0.009559066,0.0035470426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820727,0.0015312722,0.00038038616,0.0004838542,0.012550853,0.0029809242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010567018,0.0011311382,0.00128259,0.0039062425,0.021132272,0.012428782,0.003506523,0.021746634,0.023597402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020833695,0.001043807,0.0011186961,0.0044466737,0.004341432,0.0034800987,0.0028922188,0.015776556,0.004198518],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012822271,0.000011124405,0.00022337296,0.00005369562,0.000006833811,0.0001281586,0.00034565848,0.00006172589,0.00013763866,0.023702007,0.96611875,0.009198139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066992234,0.0000033986034,0.00074235233,0.00009367844,0.000008231828,0.00002863302,0.0002786339,0.00004376069,0.00008825893,0.00087110436,0.9978109,0.000024380963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95390964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97646755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0920041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0920041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29405433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6675396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790816616","doi":"","title":"Rebates: To hell with customers! (New Frontiers of Antitrust, Paris, 13 June 2016)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"Merger and Competition Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"International Air Transport Association","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.024680112182232275,"score_gpt":0.240475568483412,"score_spread":0.21579545630117974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790816616","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018696353,0.15591109,0.0016807225,0.5060848,0.06428977,0.00012543373,0.0028503642,0.001010077,0.266178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017874751,0.03471884,0.0013026944,0.24266866,0.01575745,0.00015084399,0.0010000361,0.0004445955,0.68608207],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997283,0.00044893156,0.00018110267,0.00032351151,0.0012784754,0.0004849874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99760145,0.0008667314,0.0002919674,0.00013677517,0.00082281703,0.0002802229],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003495706,0.00080735085,0.0005615256,0.0019263889,0.004182417,0.012236197,0.001420414,0.013788185,0.061439075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011177346,0.000735528,0.0008535538,0.0023686262,0.0024851228,0.008829384,0.0022305408,0.008985089,0.027871246],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001023097,0.000005883668,0.00006660807,0.000046465084,0.0000024492651,0.000036951624,0.00007460838,0.000030179346,0.00002887885,0.009971878,0.9794574,0.010268559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000097265765,0.000006933276,0.0010636413,0.0001975147,0.000003836448,0.000040378338,0.00016157927,0.000035970443,0.00006588444,0.0022792232,0.9961194,0.000015962578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08091421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16975178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08091421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007585076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009380787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20553416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790996897","doi":"","title":"Canada : The Canadian Competition Court pronounces, for the first time, a provisional injuction in a merger case (Parkland Industries)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Political science; Business","score_opus":0.07220222667672974,"score_gpt":0.31886647623516917,"score_spread":0.24666424955843944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790996897","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025038486,0.06380836,0.0025592442,0.2730546,0.0050299563,0.00017882948,0.0034044804,0.00026591582,0.62666017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3395557,0.029189335,0.0026131922,0.31766483,0.00094647746,0.0001680785,0.0011289808,0.00018576249,0.30854765],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98968,0.0004101962,0.000315585,0.0007689107,0.0062457626,0.0025795142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939201,0.0016629151,0.00025465927,0.00015225411,0.0035389203,0.0004712105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038310746,0.0005919698,0.0005388031,0.0025704633,0.020676173,0.010072684,0.0029489233,0.015811125,0.009130382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009104822,0.0006545715,0.0012111835,0.0051385043,0.0068970155,0.0022461463,0.0022615134,0.00861047,0.0014375898],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021403828,0.000018818833,0.0021651455,0.00032845224,0.000037113263,0.0005481387,0.0034946292,0.00017611239,0.0005289076,0.29415008,0.6792427,0.019288588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000165808,0.000010232997,0.0064490563,0.00035285245,0.00009001608,0.00017247892,0.0024385103,0.00011112523,0.0005986681,0.0048391735,0.9848364,0.000084883526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9891516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9958002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06978988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06978988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20512515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5063634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791210666","doi":"","title":"Portfolio Effect : The European Commission analyses category management services under conglomerate effects (Procter & Gamble/Gillette)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conglomerate; European commission; Portfolio; Commission; Business; European union; International trade; Finance; Geology","score_opus":0.027775909909490772,"score_gpt":0.3146907071859288,"score_spread":0.28691479727643804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791210666","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08017377,0.07663093,0.02316305,0.029821293,0.0022575962,0.0011232564,0.012337229,0.00045696227,0.7740358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72445244,0.036035456,0.021338968,0.028154602,0.001627482,0.0007734879,0.0064164377,0.00041396412,0.18078722],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9745942,0.005921997,0.0009277898,0.001380112,0.01545793,0.0017179489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98139966,0.008766313,0.0020320811,0.0013574761,0.006109988,0.00033447513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013325656,0.00066571566,0.00077731116,0.0083534755,0.0013226564,0.006542658,0.0017259908,0.0047714915,0.014974434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044001315,0.00040745965,0.001407359,0.009709159,0.0016793509,0.0040538954,0.0024885125,0.0024976043,0.0020750633],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035711558,0.00015913422,0.021975895,0.00081071234,0.00054863543,0.00029323087,0.0005190711,0.004654881,0.00041443875,0.6433457,0.1621116,0.16480963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016479904,0.00035579235,0.13572346,0.0018207268,0.0013882415,0.00035343552,0.00077008334,0.006063954,0.0043705585,0.07402798,0.77480286,0.00015805039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.112948775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1088711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.112948775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008392651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008711619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22458267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791559952","doi":"","title":"Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Competition Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competition law; Intellectual property; Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Competition (biology); Law; Property law; Economics; Business; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Property rights; Monopoly; Market economy","score_opus":0.11100923183440486,"score_gpt":0.3307309600709864,"score_spread":0.21972172823658154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791559952","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004802267,0.74302024,0.005550973,0.02454673,0.0085634375,0.00011101628,0.00050155603,0.0001921144,0.21703371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009962114,0.8669333,0.0070695835,0.0131400805,0.0065709334,0.00033699113,0.0015112282,0.00012990908,0.094345845],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965833,0.0005142856,0.00029332968,0.00023901951,0.002190538,0.00017952838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917476,0.005405728,0.00027810264,0.00029563866,0.002099976,0.00017296663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028019221,0.00087048026,0.0011082808,0.013651685,0.0021064116,0.0048337523,0.0015814179,0.0030999726,0.017487045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072862003,0.00063516584,0.00055227545,0.015027968,0.0035162119,0.005654308,0.0014046892,0.0037727547,0.0057867635],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047896965,0.00003672663,0.00011951686,0.001929416,0.000012085289,0.00007196693,0.0005865916,0.00027268703,0.00023402143,0.18810716,0.6406687,0.16795638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021790152,0.000005737448,0.00018673742,0.001095123,0.000007040537,0.000048764636,0.00015753355,0.000047041216,0.000041305644,0.017736908,0.9806646,0.000007040752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019697087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03404498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019697087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004257992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013301665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058499992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792005995","doi":"","title":"Canada : The Competition Tribunal specifies the conditions for the authorization of a private remedy based on a restrictive trade practice (Audatex Canada, ULC / CarProof)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Concurrence; Competition (biology); Political science; Authorization; Humanities; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science; Physics; Computer security","score_opus":0.025996610410376618,"score_gpt":0.3113055597428944,"score_spread":0.2853089493325178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792005995","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021668635,0.027001334,0.0052389484,0.19891213,0.006212144,0.0008519892,0.008073597,0.00059286616,0.73144835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23136424,0.01091617,0.009864932,0.29360434,0.001269648,0.00082157063,0.002490173,0.00034551634,0.44932345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9721834,0.0018537516,0.0016053336,0.0024995306,0.014963462,0.0068945284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9829888,0.0047206837,0.0006322092,0.0007891461,0.009630529,0.0012386593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010890898,0.0011454441,0.0013112238,0.0040068417,0.022793692,0.01517541,0.0054655853,0.033533137,0.013359264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025515867,0.0018334925,0.0024891105,0.0049351747,0.008421402,0.004200781,0.0036732156,0.018616455,0.0023601332],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004954444,0.00006015369,0.0016847263,0.00031952243,0.000056405355,0.00035853102,0.0019869034,0.00036510936,0.0007218818,0.5444062,0.43812856,0.011862392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000086340195,0.000035077213,0.007012416,0.00088750984,0.000111782174,0.0001845754,0.001661806,0.00043234538,0.00084905484,0.017551016,0.97095,0.0002381893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97902197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98401815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08770067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08770067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34352517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6363159},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792565910","doi":"","title":"355.Exploitative abuse: The Canada Federal Court of Appeal overturns the Competition Tribunal's narrow interpretation of abuse of dominant position provisions (Toronto Real Estate Board)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Tribunal; Estate; Real estate; Competition (biology); Position (finance); Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012353132633986953,"score_gpt":0.30222153001981583,"score_spread":0.28986839738582887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792565910","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05946043,0.024759388,0.0025255617,0.3420079,0.00614892,0.0007619746,0.002020754,0.00022310004,0.562092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25784212,0.0063104667,0.001814625,0.42257342,0.0016570026,0.0005576567,0.00032685886,0.00017601818,0.3087419],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9731678,0.00253251,0.0013077224,0.002816828,0.010477659,0.009697578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98304445,0.008311933,0.0007667059,0.00067421107,0.005907574,0.0012951309],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012028003,0.0013676215,0.0015273155,0.003740703,0.048566308,0.021186724,0.0075543164,0.07558054,0.010041764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030935869,0.002778629,0.0023160086,0.0044731065,0.019113779,0.005402143,0.0074356757,0.038063645,0.0019751715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000566126,0.0000711008,0.0021122328,0.0001549001,0.00005929889,0.00122642,0.01778693,0.00028753543,0.000704266,0.542891,0.4256911,0.008958504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012957935,0.00006509975,0.017266816,0.0013284137,0.00030176496,0.00049781956,0.019750698,0.00066808844,0.0013120554,0.028226517,0.9300279,0.00042524035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9760982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9900587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09086925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09086925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16414465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65930563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792687319","doi":"","title":"Droit de la concurrence – Aspects théoriques et appliqués, Karounga DIAWARA","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Concurrence; Political science; Physics","score_opus":0.0163113308163146,"score_gpt":0.3070657653018386,"score_spread":0.290754434485524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792687319","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0074761035,0.48345742,0.0053690234,0.37600592,0.010062514,0.000049763694,0.00015120473,0.000042109303,0.11738598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32001504,0.40327895,0.0048852647,0.11140723,0.0069838213,0.00016970346,0.00021780921,0.00017364511,0.15286857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99271965,0.0028557372,0.00041156888,0.00086283556,0.0025874123,0.0005627835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9794277,0.011012215,0.0009997451,0.0007672113,0.0071048927,0.0006881706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009118211,0.0004195509,0.00086023565,0.0039355066,0.0069567626,0.009256194,0.0014298,0.003437702,0.0066469978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022871777,0.0004322333,0.00036258402,0.005250661,0.0070196185,0.0072804294,0.0026536463,0.005204658,0.0012819208],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029438934,0.000017586874,0.0008954489,0.0005131307,0.00003061848,0.00023353199,0.0077572362,0.00016157741,0.0001249257,0.72187996,0.21132173,0.057034805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008211516,0.000009576971,0.0013651995,0.001349154,0.00002633244,0.00023824126,0.002903663,0.00013298116,0.0001535355,0.054098297,0.9396849,0.000029865498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13051023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1855645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13051023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017417364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019965578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2595011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792770270","doi":"","title":"Canada: The British Columbia Court of Appeal refuses to rule on a class action of indirect purchasers (Sun-Rype Products/Archer Daniels Midland ; Pro Sys Consultants/Microsoft Corporation )","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Class action; Law; Corporation; Political science; Humanities; Sociology; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.07854447336416934,"score_gpt":0.3345121602147928,"score_spread":0.25596768685062343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792770270","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044399686,0.013028331,0.0023536123,0.26333433,0.009744796,0.00092032633,0.0056061363,0.0004061079,0.6602066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18112095,0.0052799615,0.002412566,0.20759764,0.00054443657,0.00045556523,0.0010705467,0.00016894151,0.60134935],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98830914,0.0005835109,0.00062894117,0.0013148731,0.005032407,0.0041311886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873984,0.0029350433,0.000369391,0.0005552879,0.007561643,0.001180286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053908024,0.000835929,0.0010042082,0.0027615381,0.024392432,0.008704309,0.0047542253,0.02083926,0.021523673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017459556,0.0017412025,0.0015413704,0.0036527226,0.0046429215,0.002372438,0.0023982862,0.019948417,0.0030444032],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069886824,0.000055266897,0.0052533527,0.00025538317,0.000089464134,0.00096682104,0.0034512032,0.0001559351,0.00072282186,0.12874159,0.8398859,0.02035238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009711843,0.00002537819,0.01431397,0.000783811,0.00023196582,0.00028279508,0.0049052285,0.00029355683,0.0012939662,0.0059695113,0.9716069,0.00019580872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98905396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99629164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.074190766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.074190766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2062553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5382942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792802110","doi":"","title":"Competition and Globalization in Developing Economies (New York, October 28, 2016)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"EU Law and Policy Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Competition (biology); Economics; Economy; Economic geography; International trade; Market economy","score_opus":0.09792155532411213,"score_gpt":0.3921115983601588,"score_spread":0.2941900430360467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792802110","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023863405,0.9316748,0.00020278699,0.038045343,0.007980006,0.000028503435,0.00027041143,0.0000111597,0.021548329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0057714293,0.9256211,0.00043134502,0.034107074,0.0052470784,0.00010326303,0.0003075186,0.000024748291,0.028386358],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977156,0.00046487435,0.00023199391,0.00018549638,0.0012409517,0.00016106863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969273,0.0012896669,0.00038315987,0.000111719775,0.0010680285,0.00022011194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034028501,0.00085089245,0.0007766155,0.0047073425,0.0014809904,0.004468259,0.0008646165,0.005263341,0.009278996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072229984,0.0005913422,0.0005134311,0.0070053744,0.0031492035,0.0058398806,0.0025106093,0.004042047,0.002179044],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002008019,0.000016285861,0.00029900955,0.0022742318,0.000023432165,0.0000948972,0.0004463769,0.00016739246,0.0001686384,0.04425242,0.87945724,0.07277989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065613494,0.00000920954,0.0016927123,0.004968582,0.000013232629,0.000060057293,0.00023872893,0.000028609862,0.00005412014,0.0075743296,0.98534137,0.000012610453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0721669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19444078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0721669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009720848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016270384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14349365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792880640","doi":"","title":"Canada : Antitrust Class Actions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Class action; Business; Economics; Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04343123904191945,"score_gpt":0.3401369598745449,"score_spread":0.2967057208326255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792880640","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048180986,0.09997467,0.000847854,0.1190723,0.0031475592,0.00015275547,0.0014046648,0.00012941915,0.77045274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20729889,0.090342805,0.0024816857,0.18461666,0.0023545085,0.00023445081,0.001028589,0.00014408064,0.5114984],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873139,0.00060188805,0.00023146393,0.00082675915,0.00912019,0.0019057496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99377066,0.0010336849,0.00019802878,0.00019074016,0.0043922183,0.0004145768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035236129,0.0007582851,0.0005911551,0.005109696,0.014124108,0.009978853,0.0026196064,0.011387732,0.0144033665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007398874,0.00061424944,0.0007938581,0.006521887,0.0058578504,0.0021619021,0.0014614837,0.0062352405,0.0023128528],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017571147,0.000021364342,0.0006244255,0.00030389667,0.0000188905,0.0002168966,0.0010332786,0.00021744752,0.00024379621,0.41564283,0.55033493,0.031324696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001636949,0.0000071249283,0.0024805674,0.0004656474,0.000029142362,0.000056922207,0.00047313617,0.00010046949,0.00021505583,0.010461362,0.98566484,0.000029354796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.983576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98876417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.105429575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.105429575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19922578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76494867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793500892","doi":"","title":"The long crossing to the right of compensation: The Canadian rule for indirect purchasers","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Compensation (psychology); Normative; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Actuarial science; Business; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.061994080708448786,"score_gpt":0.37225255675714825,"score_spread":0.31025847604869944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793500892","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018008014,0.037834905,0.0108576855,0.29948246,0.0036309117,0.00017776527,0.0009951981,0.00010934695,0.6289037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57135135,0.021804404,0.013065838,0.21268617,0.0027132311,0.00025128236,0.0005100724,0.00019284907,0.17742477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9680876,0.002381916,0.0010377393,0.003411739,0.019265363,0.0058155833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98558307,0.0050045922,0.0004578146,0.0006526254,0.0073419125,0.00095995696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012770135,0.00076168316,0.0013424277,0.0030816053,0.019516528,0.015298228,0.0049654483,0.016557097,0.0051341867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025743872,0.0010038065,0.0012867673,0.0037290833,0.02495843,0.0046804184,0.003272657,0.02342083,0.000768643],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068427667,0.000005984029,0.00038139964,0.000055260338,0.000011753561,0.0000991955,0.0016872494,0.00013027519,0.00008177307,0.9462307,0.04498124,0.006328347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005092595,0.000020690031,0.0046786508,0.001352471,0.00012060031,0.00019874376,0.00256015,0.00064006954,0.0004941694,0.2301998,0.7594592,0.000224563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9777514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98580694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08019844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08019844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22275513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5818831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793686771","doi":"","title":"Canada: The Competition Tribunal rules that the new price maintenance provision requires resale (Visa Canada et MasterCard International)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"EU Law and Policy Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Competition (biology); Business; Resale price maintenance; Commerce; Industrial organization; International trade; Economics; Political science; Microeconomics; Incentive; Law","score_opus":0.03244855060069882,"score_gpt":0.31416776361735044,"score_spread":0.2817192130166516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793686771","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015776668,0.034767553,0.0023246265,0.2549322,0.0057972847,0.00058666314,0.016160073,0.00057411625,0.66908085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13830273,0.011901626,0.003783079,0.1960341,0.0011522999,0.0003412163,0.0025417653,0.0002732043,0.6456699],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98844784,0.00038192587,0.0003838202,0.0008232128,0.007425871,0.002537314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99200714,0.0009832978,0.00023520259,0.0002355503,0.005985019,0.0005538472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042729266,0.00077610026,0.0007019489,0.0021947569,0.011813226,0.010070183,0.0040202476,0.0168715,0.0116999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0119496975,0.001118712,0.0011316459,0.004286932,0.0035611975,0.0023302687,0.0014203239,0.009755608,0.0023439887],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035687644,0.00002695433,0.0011032709,0.00012416362,0.000020047268,0.00014360645,0.0006444541,0.00020361035,0.0003107584,0.14679946,0.842121,0.008466933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049230737,0.00001705095,0.009024659,0.00028898744,0.000052527685,0.000053235282,0.0005574673,0.00021812502,0.00041373554,0.00499008,0.9842418,0.00009313033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99008805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9942023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07855636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07855636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26832238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56996894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794181023","doi":"","title":"Access to an infrastructure: The Court of Cassation rules on the conditions for access to a slaughter house (Abattoir de Laval - Privileg...)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07883833413711833,"score_gpt":0.4170953962127321,"score_spread":0.3382570620756138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794181023","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020940501,0.13175459,0.0027212454,0.18839607,0.0032500748,0.00019984641,0.0010702524,0.00007742922,0.65159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59885,0.06493362,0.0023101708,0.15244174,0.0050409664,0.0005649699,0.00062153745,0.00009523971,0.1751418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888017,0.0030723568,0.0007404711,0.0013194089,0.0036548553,0.0024112894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99359375,0.0039932467,0.0004318522,0.00039153252,0.0013561329,0.0002335289],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011403826,0.00068727555,0.00073960045,0.0016899019,0.008319766,0.010529797,0.003015689,0.021313421,0.006730591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02178554,0.0009143039,0.0011017396,0.0026276007,0.010089577,0.006865816,0.0040952414,0.011824192,0.0015455134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003351113,0.000012803634,0.00055063434,0.00012815453,0.000016135129,0.00021526375,0.0016891153,0.00013463141,0.00014802608,0.88103026,0.10851161,0.0075297467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009673215,0.00007440799,0.008311156,0.0020018877,0.00013235089,0.0003348586,0.0035380567,0.0004253792,0.0006771917,0.17961015,0.80468196,0.000115911644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2590616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2989434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2590616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013245401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023236455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5151074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794734713","doi":"","title":"Canada: The Competition Bureau authorizes a merger in the retail fuel distribution sector following mediation (Parkland)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Political science; Distribution (mathematics); Mediation; Competition law; Welfare economics; Economics; Business; Economy; Humanities; Law; International trade; Monopoly; Market economy; Art","score_opus":0.03723022516186197,"score_gpt":0.24451037875841056,"score_spread":0.20728015359654858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794734713","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09358252,0.015246165,0.0027260233,0.17160265,0.005890257,0.00075290917,0.002612891,0.0004989892,0.7070875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30694285,0.006209788,0.0014864797,0.10007697,0.0008783216,0.00013244015,0.00087891315,0.00013340864,0.58326083],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99340993,0.0004083136,0.00023207316,0.00050646527,0.0030293271,0.0024138258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945427,0.0014073245,0.00029959664,0.00025297422,0.0026614398,0.0008359579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038007118,0.0004197073,0.00035350546,0.0017810498,0.015978236,0.006571838,0.002264932,0.015383308,0.014166525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008166338,0.0005220193,0.00079828175,0.0024828305,0.0030129035,0.0015791496,0.0021642055,0.0065280264,0.0019170457],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011371383,0.00015068515,0.015596856,0.00031017582,0.000070196234,0.0038575511,0.006774223,0.00038872592,0.0022149233,0.19072387,0.73513633,0.04466282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003876985,0.000047384397,0.02244914,0.00016161731,0.00007739766,0.00042808868,0.0052630003,0.0002003633,0.0018887592,0.0021762718,0.9671785,0.00009073693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92639536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9744039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07360464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035262167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.103571676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25584614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795594000","doi":"","title":"Canada: The Competition Bureau approves the merger of the two largest book retailers in Quebec (Renaud-Bray, Archambault)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Business; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.058367307217837734,"score_gpt":0.3371742987692047,"score_spread":0.27880699155136696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795594000","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22933598,0.020073222,0.0045046383,0.2224309,0.0069414866,0.0017846739,0.014208447,0.001394518,0.49932614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.356739,0.0033703614,0.0036427062,0.054391075,0.0003916924,0.00023557227,0.0031122954,0.00017776799,0.57793957],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99539363,0.00022980005,0.00013173421,0.00036508465,0.0022559087,0.0016238268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903258,0.00086134044,0.00034338035,0.00025860773,0.0065381443,0.0016727053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003631391,0.0004768696,0.00061693543,0.0018595275,0.00999534,0.0058699697,0.002158422,0.008187588,0.021195017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070731896,0.0007038195,0.0011126625,0.002726026,0.0016928054,0.0016471306,0.0014367165,0.00435807,0.001695319],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037364574,0.00023716623,0.053810563,0.00058785814,0.00028342585,0.0016801959,0.0021314793,0.0011498475,0.0034065687,0.06514215,0.79645115,0.07474596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016779653,0.00012550001,0.12794772,0.00026641577,0.00017688873,0.00020843302,0.0027665487,0.00093404204,0.002051693,0.00119399,0.86398745,0.00017353639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9908084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9944863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06176922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06176922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18177088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4481691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796530268","doi":"","title":"Canada: The Federal Court of Appeal rules that the analysis required for the review of a merger under section 92 of the Competition Act involving the prevention of competition is necessarily forward-looking (Tervita)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Competition (biology); Section (typography); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Competition law; Economics; Business; Monopoly; Advertising; Market economy","score_opus":0.06290219385863227,"score_gpt":0.3078167051415606,"score_spread":0.24491451128292835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796530268","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0060816715,0.21548668,0.003477247,0.1896173,0.009322491,0.0018776436,0.0100659905,0.0006190666,0.56345195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10969507,0.1596953,0.010713779,0.3010992,0.0022264312,0.0017206111,0.0059910817,0.00022813477,0.40863037],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98731285,0.00058689876,0.0007397258,0.00067804026,0.009122632,0.0015597916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9830088,0.0025704708,0.00064311706,0.00036984484,0.012736944,0.0006707693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008584085,0.000646936,0.0011051064,0.0049505527,0.007563216,0.006555269,0.0034695067,0.011558385,0.0075537125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019167842,0.00089269,0.001625364,0.006427938,0.0025098645,0.0016177299,0.0013300355,0.0068539064,0.0033509268],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003630154,0.00003134119,0.0010705029,0.0013940647,0.000059488633,0.00029333567,0.00050704525,0.00010811293,0.0007927665,0.05702013,0.887141,0.051545996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022810369,0.000010253776,0.0025780413,0.0010804109,0.00009141933,0.000074026015,0.00013251042,0.00004551273,0.00038664095,0.0015252039,0.99402326,0.00002993001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91292334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9524608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9580305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041969467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25256863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3045112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2798188177","doi":"","title":"Horizontal merger : The Canadian Competition Authority clears under conditions a horizontal merger on the newspapers market (Transcontinental)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Competition (biology); Merger guidelines; Horizontal and vertical; Market definition; Merger control; Business; Horizontal integration; Economics; Advertising; Industrial organization; Market structure; Geography; Marketing; Biology; Ecology; Commission; Finance","score_opus":0.028604152960290147,"score_gpt":0.30339886394446736,"score_spread":0.2747947109841772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2798188177","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31186858,0.020769978,0.0019647346,0.043062244,0.0004236715,0.0002599412,0.0007289355,0.00008842338,0.6208336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96817195,0.0058270246,0.00085500686,0.008289042,0.0001166983,0.000036572288,0.0002909357,0.00001488028,0.016397817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912442,0.0005983071,0.00023299224,0.0007206672,0.003675464,0.0035284318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98903173,0.0021125423,0.0016554516,0.00060949236,0.0054205777,0.0011702671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004636986,0.00030800636,0.0004391274,0.0027735454,0.007803471,0.011926715,0.0018002506,0.0033282961,0.0068686814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014190038,0.00032936523,0.00060562673,0.005832734,0.010445234,0.004451107,0.003235185,0.002573793,0.00040082325],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001361891,0.000057908743,0.033912413,0.0006466903,0.00011312104,0.0011603817,0.013698925,0.0006939596,0.0021702624,0.79131585,0.039776146,0.1163181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010017721,0.00015893091,0.22099221,0.00202939,0.00032228586,0.00059260824,0.0498623,0.0009504124,0.0031122642,0.053494796,0.6681458,0.00023875928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9153535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94128597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08464652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05889868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13607317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42734182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800019219","doi":"","title":"Conglomerate mergers: Advocate General Tizzano invites the ECJ to dismiss the appeal against the CFI's decision setting aside the Tetra Laval/Sidel decision","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Aside; Appeal; Tetra; Law; Political science; Conglomerate; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Chemistry; Linguistics; Geology","score_opus":0.021103039238525613,"score_gpt":0.28648093563837335,"score_spread":0.2653778963998477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800019219","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010909113,0.0069493945,0.0008539895,0.78999853,0.00859769,0.0001428358,0.00026097323,0.00011956375,0.18216784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.056496553,0.0017145835,0.0007085481,0.8031308,0.0047857566,0.00015462805,0.00009824034,0.000063258136,0.13284759],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.988872,0.001591438,0.00040127226,0.0018815146,0.0042801555,0.0029736033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99067897,0.005067694,0.0004370275,0.00046202002,0.0026740895,0.0006800811],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009754129,0.0010872341,0.0012130851,0.0018078294,0.017010711,0.015276149,0.004438112,0.06585187,0.0082379095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025834752,0.0010866807,0.0020056693,0.0021791044,0.0067849075,0.0047260583,0.0040150937,0.03631565,0.0024431183],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006526965,0.000056966077,0.001073531,0.00008370629,0.000035512494,0.0004469867,0.0013538826,0.00016408804,0.000498971,0.26538014,0.7241386,0.006702253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000116820855,0.00007605362,0.0036973432,0.0003823702,0.000108802444,0.00018663077,0.001520923,0.00056027214,0.000915017,0.03613509,0.9561796,0.000121055586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17836012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.281191,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17836012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013245826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023415562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35464388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800849714","doi":"","title":"Canada - Class action: The Superior Court of Quebec authorizes a second class action in the gasoline sector (Jacques/Pétroles Irving)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Class (philosophy); Cartel; Action (physics); Political science; Law; Humanities; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy; State (computer science); Epistemology; Computer science; Incentive; Physics","score_opus":0.042667565044940244,"score_gpt":0.27462597075808864,"score_spread":0.2319584057131484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800849714","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.085369326,0.012648533,0.0025250278,0.23261823,0.0059141694,0.0005819997,0.0015812337,0.00023218074,0.6585294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38932416,0.002798276,0.0012858402,0.15630706,0.0007362663,0.00020571616,0.00033043692,0.00012452336,0.44888777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854966,0.00090760697,0.0003572988,0.0015862721,0.0048816563,0.0067705764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99024534,0.0022242463,0.00037132084,0.00054794387,0.0049063815,0.001704718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007947932,0.0008581647,0.0007695631,0.0021876236,0.030059276,0.015934078,0.003598831,0.023545701,0.013031843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014698081,0.0010656416,0.0015439485,0.002471178,0.0068811113,0.0035618846,0.0035760081,0.017997613,0.0011493291],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010521891,0.000069624155,0.006144847,0.0001275891,0.00010267816,0.001159829,0.0057955044,0.00043412097,0.0010692996,0.5462446,0.42317203,0.015574733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015614762,0.00004787018,0.014972101,0.00041554632,0.00014724818,0.00023465834,0.004969769,0.0007206168,0.0016311563,0.011754012,0.96474034,0.00021065373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9886551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99413496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1118285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1118285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2412783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81137633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801263581","doi":"","title":"Canada: John Pecman is appointed as Competition Commissioner","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Concurrence; Political science; Competition (biology); The arts; Humanities; Art; Law","score_opus":0.018567523371866373,"score_gpt":0.2948042057620189,"score_spread":0.27623668239015253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801263581","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028934875,0.0937536,0.0011757619,0.54536706,0.03786817,0.00023487088,0.0017687214,0.00023873821,0.31669965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029492702,0.02015647,0.0006656179,0.09041372,0.0019074755,0.0000861659,0.000501049,0.00008298624,0.85669374],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947582,0.0003151007,0.00014990689,0.00062318647,0.0029134424,0.0012400541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912949,0.00071515894,0.00023828346,0.00018131557,0.006312303,0.0012581332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032328411,0.0005637962,0.00080682983,0.0019387954,0.013185916,0.006901436,0.0021064116,0.008787624,0.03917831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0087756235,0.000515261,0.0006099685,0.0030820344,0.002664238,0.0031078989,0.0015040705,0.006526551,0.008356972],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011349687,0.0000056517574,0.00023076947,0.00007176118,0.0000062885974,0.00006949783,0.00013165487,0.000022008431,0.00006184454,0.01492321,0.97214174,0.012324243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004847323,0.00000358203,0.0006674637,0.00011038339,0.000006549834,0.000029156532,0.0002468575,0.000026954278,0.00007736584,0.0006237852,0.99819213,0.000010849515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8594475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9276197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14055252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03780319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.136119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2827605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802287812","doi":"","title":"Canada : The Competition tribunal confirms and strengthens the analytical framework of interpretation and application of the provision on abuse of dominant position in a review (The Toronto Real Estate Board)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Position (finance); Interpretation (philosophy); Competition (biology); Real estate; Tribunal; Estate; Business; Agency (philosophy); Regional science; Political science; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Finance; Social science","score_opus":0.01898332673816714,"score_gpt":0.3533599690517028,"score_spread":0.33437664231353564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802287812","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025350575,0.061539892,0.0017173262,0.87586534,0.022000398,0.00045103804,0.0015259511,0.00011425396,0.034250762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06179335,0.03509272,0.009114168,0.84491885,0.006295142,0.0006778418,0.00075382803,0.00016458593,0.04118951],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.930917,0.007872213,0.0052999016,0.004484457,0.042361613,0.009064707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8536637,0.050778754,0.005640177,0.003908433,0.0758444,0.010164588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.065965556,0.0008841652,0.0023703792,0.009155757,0.02100093,0.019584069,0.0071068443,0.02538057,0.0042285225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12753044,0.0014362342,0.0025353248,0.013992959,0.017466404,0.0054728133,0.004964833,0.02648477,0.0009302594],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041981035,0.000019057583,0.0006581528,0.0013367092,0.000097271506,0.00022322609,0.0025929993,0.00008911149,0.0003248433,0.09896085,0.8787834,0.016872313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007548269,0.000026556138,0.0038157268,0.0036302402,0.00025667844,0.00007192449,0.0012394546,0.0001456362,0.00039464838,0.010394442,0.979809,0.00014018257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96094126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.987609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12848984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12848984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.55405706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9322634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804078537","doi":"","title":"Canada: The Competition Tribunal rules that without exclusion of a competitor there is no abuse of dominant position (Toronto Real Estate Board)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Concurrence; Political science; Estate; Competition (biology); Position (finance); Humanities; Business; Law; Philosophy; Physics; Finance","score_opus":0.01663972533372275,"score_gpt":0.24361494170206882,"score_spread":0.22697521636834608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804078537","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024250159,0.047152728,0.0033442748,0.25355902,0.010467223,0.000642078,0.00606744,0.00046937683,0.6540477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16607842,0.011346544,0.0049663302,0.12682514,0.0011048184,0.00027853303,0.0012736395,0.00031293085,0.6878137],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98871034,0.0004620468,0.0005655388,0.0010430528,0.0064950306,0.0027241025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933606,0.0009567244,0.0002287163,0.00025562567,0.004373044,0.0008253535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045852414,0.0007681655,0.0007339676,0.0017532537,0.019642558,0.011692443,0.0032306537,0.013676896,0.01033568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009752263,0.0011213965,0.0009740244,0.0037889855,0.006436587,0.0021936835,0.0023709813,0.012410611,0.0020421825],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028292749,0.000026982121,0.0012795557,0.00012877607,0.000019136693,0.00024803355,0.0025219037,0.00015418536,0.0004983631,0.20713598,0.77385235,0.014106484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022178114,0.000011440139,0.006524416,0.00019523191,0.000032222717,0.00007252324,0.0012048646,0.00011936462,0.00039399738,0.0039016565,0.9874352,0.00008692544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9894376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9956741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.080921635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.080921635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28768453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5871303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901804031","doi":"","title":"Action for annulment – Locus standi: The General Court applies the standing criteria under Art 263(4) TFEU in an action for annulment of a normative act (Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Annulment; Parliament; Tribunal; Law; Normative; Political science; Action (physics); Physics","score_opus":0.25960390387511734,"score_gpt":0.45103725936140276,"score_spread":0.19143335548628543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901804031","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044497035,0.002624574,0.0061076274,0.027223542,0.0012754572,0.0005084544,0.00042707066,0.00022695941,0.9171093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63104147,0.00084895367,0.004398578,0.07528719,0.0007287237,0.00061897375,0.0003261734,0.00011639059,0.2866336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98828167,0.0012775313,0.0007773299,0.0018312001,0.00502401,0.0028082363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963201,0.0013923942,0.00031424488,0.0004997883,0.0011157679,0.00035770144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008456199,0.0006565621,0.0007118447,0.0010186053,0.007901645,0.0066865557,0.0044862246,0.024949165,0.009136064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0130745135,0.0008469356,0.0013963006,0.00072567345,0.00622602,0.003149184,0.00498796,0.013594531,0.0035488782],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009507894,0.00012157267,0.0025678684,0.00023474253,0.000052948828,0.001793069,0.0070648617,0.00029651058,0.0042921086,0.8816559,0.085308686,0.016516702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014822044,0.0004135478,0.013850618,0.0012738327,0.00018658681,0.00219118,0.0065710833,0.0010624343,0.009215148,0.11797446,0.84679943,0.0003134271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04489265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.076557375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04489265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053495956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013975751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.089262664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912733357","doi":"","title":"Burden of proof: The ECJ gives some guidance regarding the burden of proof and behavioural remedies Tetra Laval","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tetra; Burden of proof; Commission; European commission; Law; Proof of concept; Law and economics; Political science; Chemistry; Computer science; Business; Economics; European union; Medicinal chemistry; International trade","score_opus":0.05727250508509614,"score_gpt":0.3396477420296931,"score_spread":0.282375236944597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912733357","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004723544,0.016228456,0.02018564,0.50620747,0.014118071,0.0010338159,0.0016051981,0.0011034985,0.43479428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13202065,0.0054613957,0.02997318,0.7014034,0.008167506,0.0020812566,0.00068640936,0.00072289107,0.11948332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.86082494,0.039326485,0.017271737,0.011016577,0.057506632,0.014053779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7689178,0.15847872,0.009267526,0.018635223,0.04165901,0.0030417577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08862221,0.0020712635,0.0027816154,0.0056617013,0.010457134,0.02535799,0.013092357,0.10018744,0.019888386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26913106,0.002698941,0.005353641,0.0039173607,0.018634833,0.017979868,0.009413647,0.041970715,0.009589541],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006792796,0.00008555984,0.0003793356,0.00031175042,0.000044528875,0.00035771733,0.0014231952,0.00024595426,0.00057596574,0.62062603,0.36537594,0.010506125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022433669,0.00015042664,0.0019841078,0.00281785,0.00015323884,0.00070938666,0.0009423783,0.0007369451,0.0015106126,0.10087044,0.88955104,0.00034919215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07002767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048944857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10018744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015311243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038121697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46868467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948964787","doi":"","title":"L'alternative du commun. Les colloques de Cerisy, Christian LAVAL, Pierre SAUVÊTRE and Ferhat TAYLAN (dir.)","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.042171381536015046,"score_gpt":0.30708600370708805,"score_spread":0.264914622171073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948964787","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002605968,0.92308,0.00021748939,0.0654753,0.007525643,0.0000026265268,0.00005111732,0.000009094116,0.0033781042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026085574,0.9007406,0.0005859215,0.025905306,0.023357477,0.0000505797,0.00016404134,0.00006846247,0.023042077],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966672,0.0020807537,0.00012278472,0.00034892507,0.00051416655,0.0002661837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995996,0.0024623398,0.0002882812,0.00013879639,0.00089298584,0.00022161141],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039778654,0.0010992419,0.0011935442,0.0024360153,0.0021047054,0.004967595,0.0011519799,0.0037585334,0.00954991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007672033,0.00045301035,0.0007154342,0.003390779,0.005031595,0.006109144,0.002269228,0.0043810843,0.0023703733],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000877796,0.000020207373,0.0003514202,0.0028131155,0.00005572936,0.00020278773,0.0023609858,0.00012532316,0.00012313994,0.08763322,0.7194482,0.18677807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001071139,0.000014632414,0.00080213934,0.0020569782,0.000016381495,0.00024146121,0.0010467552,0.00004671962,0.000079180805,0.007007278,0.9886641,0.000013705891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032905605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04223947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032905605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051300623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052189496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06542814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949835537","doi":"","title":"Spain: The Spanish Supreme Court confirms the right to be heard when there is a change in the legal qualification of the facts at the end of the infringement procedure, but only in case the change can result in the companies being otherwise defenseless (Maderas José Sainz)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"Human Rights and Immigration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Quarter (Canadian coin); History","score_opus":0.12111826841108651,"score_gpt":0.35508501037724693,"score_spread":0.2339667419661604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949835537","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06737632,0.037564676,0.0065296437,0.24849172,0.012693255,0.00037325494,0.0021733039,0.00034992752,0.6244479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50900507,0.010613934,0.00406656,0.3409191,0.0031423883,0.00027153286,0.0010961534,0.00011838434,0.13076687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9845073,0.0022886754,0.0012163796,0.0019728383,0.0065646395,0.0034501494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98869365,0.0045283437,0.0006817725,0.00074282463,0.0047665844,0.0005867658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017539442,0.000622666,0.0011242657,0.0019466191,0.005637844,0.007916964,0.003085522,0.017834792,0.005750844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033967882,0.0006766829,0.0014379114,0.0015801499,0.0074984455,0.0028949457,0.0033195885,0.012276946,0.0019469268],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018315711,0.00013137622,0.0055233412,0.0008426175,0.0003041006,0.001772693,0.0054685855,0.00050888135,0.0028717392,0.5835726,0.35836083,0.040460072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019647463,0.00009080941,0.009589506,0.0016607377,0.00042093612,0.000490838,0.0038031128,0.00028284255,0.0031021058,0.041844267,0.9383179,0.00020034784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18154831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18490246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18154831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009440088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033099815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36098313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2987293383","doi":"","title":"US: The US Supreme Court rules that mobile Apps users are direct buyers and have standing to sue the platform that distributes them (Apple / Pepper)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"Sharing Economy and Platforms","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Pepper; Advertising; Quarter (Canadian coin); Business; Mobile apps; Law; Political science; Computer science; History; Computer security; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.05607576218789478,"score_gpt":0.2546043139325502,"score_spread":0.1985285517446554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2987293383","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016863914,0.017658556,0.0020983417,0.26950607,0.00559948,0.00013397413,0.0032223046,0.00029054857,0.6846268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25750345,0.0134801585,0.0021588197,0.39539662,0.0030496907,0.0002723758,0.0016079418,0.0001302267,0.32640085],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964431,0.00038091882,0.00015757425,0.00048545707,0.001881949,0.0006510253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99668044,0.0012264833,0.00014383272,0.00014389747,0.0016545313,0.0001507417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032243228,0.00046637814,0.00029714682,0.0009023366,0.007034987,0.007297194,0.00105789,0.010255506,0.011012995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006526771,0.0004711081,0.00072474533,0.0016800546,0.00233257,0.0033669951,0.0013454534,0.008751938,0.0043281224],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021467522,0.000033355722,0.000982362,0.000075350436,0.000017114584,0.00017733862,0.0006396455,0.00006945601,0.00044443685,0.22642632,0.7538064,0.017306767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020906651,0.000028657574,0.003063671,0.00030837284,0.00006292824,0.00009570471,0.0006483629,0.00015922007,0.0008491388,0.016484896,0.9782389,0.000039197654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15461276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2076714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15461276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046526585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015085695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30742568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009927053","doi":"","title":"Selective distribution: The Paris Court of Appeal recalls that a restriction on online sales may be appropriate without being necessary (Stihl)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Quarter (Canadian coin); Law; Political science; Continuation; Court decision; Advertising; Business; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.04955893432994275,"score_gpt":0.35096347468368505,"score_spread":0.3014045403537423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3009927053","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016326325,0.011174711,0.004544544,0.26906997,0.006861016,0.00024038674,0.0008801753,0.0004512813,0.6904516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2516722,0.0035933403,0.0016570165,0.40343207,0.0048907218,0.00042515056,0.00033946856,0.00016034581,0.3338298],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.984177,0.0022571848,0.0006220527,0.0021969243,0.006958124,0.0037887206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913521,0.004504042,0.0003858981,0.0006561125,0.0027227465,0.00037917582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011077148,0.00075501663,0.0005828289,0.0019438751,0.010298318,0.010027042,0.004282381,0.020610932,0.023993047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02359313,0.0008475617,0.0015464902,0.001803102,0.009195292,0.0061921445,0.003517462,0.01666122,0.007386214],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038163354,0.00003086645,0.0008285293,0.000105092004,0.000026760037,0.000585052,0.0011990168,0.000121443656,0.00032345467,0.43369585,0.5473217,0.015724061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005657296,0.000056530786,0.0032508892,0.0003294358,0.000036763224,0.00052351557,0.0012189627,0.00022156308,0.000818427,0.017905606,0.97552276,0.000058988084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11150857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13495055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11150857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012594089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015718995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22171903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114342144","doi":"","title":"Exclusive distribution: The Paris Court of Appeal holds that the continuation of a commercial relationship, after the non-renewal of an exclusive distribution contract, is not governed by the terms of the non-renewed contract, which include the distributor's exclusive supply obligation (CMS Dental / Septodont)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Quarter (Canadian coin); Distribution (mathematics); High Court; Law; Continuation; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Mathematics; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.028112223662969307,"score_gpt":0.31139274414663193,"score_spread":0.28328052048366265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3114342144","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0104970215,0.036439635,0.009354087,0.17021734,0.008002416,0.00025568408,0.0005268769,0.00023986012,0.7644671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30814356,0.01457624,0.005589072,0.32299376,0.007025717,0.000458714,0.0005811521,0.0002117021,0.3404202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97521687,0.003957695,0.0013509201,0.0029728208,0.0118382,0.0046634646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869075,0.006820599,0.0006172302,0.00078918587,0.0042518144,0.00061370665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018313207,0.00074227515,0.00087002246,0.0021615864,0.01034585,0.014660776,0.004498055,0.023392493,0.014785006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032528944,0.00078558805,0.0015385448,0.0025239799,0.01206243,0.007911602,0.005268996,0.018927647,0.003952786],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001985629,0.000024118839,0.000433172,0.00014537144,0.000025169931,0.0004623641,0.0011127662,0.00012219598,0.0001658757,0.8151856,0.16584581,0.016457694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029062621,0.000025963243,0.0016464596,0.00047775035,0.000037413534,0.00037341585,0.0008179649,0.00014004685,0.00034723897,0.03477799,0.961274,0.00005269989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11937308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.109563895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11937308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019165646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04001376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23735648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162243677","doi":"","title":"Canada: The legal regime of private enforcement - The conditions for success in civil law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université TÉLUQ","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Enforcement; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Private law; Law and economics; Commercial law; Business; Public law; Sociology","score_opus":0.04086764620384174,"score_gpt":0.35159602778185267,"score_spread":0.3107283815780109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162243677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023307646,0.28941706,0.0015234187,0.22340906,0.0015169992,0.00009862461,0.0013580007,0.000070840586,0.45929843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71821445,0.18679258,0.001807209,0.041596394,0.0012517915,0.000111652545,0.0007736819,0.00008492222,0.049367312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99041665,0.0009054283,0.00023326399,0.00072863407,0.0051528653,0.002563052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906483,0.0022904098,0.00060487294,0.00031822262,0.0049967025,0.0011414177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042130845,0.00038876315,0.00072928576,0.0040832716,0.009207983,0.0118275685,0.0020345014,0.005602537,0.008472792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012967602,0.00037470384,0.000514478,0.006283256,0.011839579,0.0033176597,0.0019647053,0.004177203,0.00065615267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029402323,0.000026391333,0.0032721427,0.00082746136,0.000051664083,0.00025201155,0.0019789643,0.0003935398,0.00019202493,0.78804564,0.13161781,0.073312886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004738326,0.000027932594,0.028890502,0.00391521,0.00011392525,0.00022812934,0.0050868522,0.00056687737,0.00030123614,0.078568645,0.8821633,0.000089955014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9808147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9891811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09954127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09954127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29723656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72222584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213284292","doi":"","title":"Commercial agency: The French Supreme Court clearly confirms the extensive assessment of the commercial agent's power (ATL Location / SWAL / Avis)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Negotiation; Agency (philosophy); Consolidation (business); Law; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Power (physics); Business; Law and economics; History; Economics; Sociology; Accounting; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03954885643621187,"score_gpt":0.30457281874570447,"score_spread":0.2650239623094926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213284292","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051511105,0.011305497,0.0046631796,0.22681323,0.0030435747,0.0001289392,0.0010058237,0.00032036914,0.7012083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61316127,0.002808858,0.0022897022,0.17256464,0.0021030323,0.00014584765,0.000473189,0.0001556764,0.20629786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99039745,0.0018154886,0.0003488533,0.0011107702,0.0032516192,0.0030758302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914477,0.0033830965,0.00028630756,0.00037145204,0.0041209133,0.00039055294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0080060875,0.00059390086,0.0006317183,0.00199311,0.012747534,0.01637967,0.002204855,0.014903339,0.010107123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013780854,0.00040739792,0.0012763179,0.0022013884,0.005873944,0.0029843196,0.002091579,0.008101582,0.0027089561],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042483898,0.000031200292,0.0014347228,0.00009337393,0.000042590993,0.00077534164,0.002971375,0.0001713117,0.00085888075,0.716125,0.26707968,0.010374145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004061473,0.000057941757,0.006004792,0.00030189313,0.000089343666,0.0004250864,0.0028856338,0.00079083367,0.002036272,0.030583696,0.9566777,0.0001061384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40408063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4504686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40408063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016543096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020142147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80345726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}