{"meta":{"query_hash":"55e2a80e3894","filters":{"venue":"Conservation Letters"},"cohort_total":197,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":197,"exported":197,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/55e2a80e3894","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Conservation+Letters"},"results":[{"id":"W1482319075","doi":"10.1111/conl.12123","title":"Reliable Identification of Declining Populations in an Uncertain World","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Simon Fraser University; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Population; Oncorhynchus; Identification (biology); Reliability (semiconductor); Population viability analysis; Environmental resource management; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Geography; Fishery; Environmental science; Biology; Endangered species; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Demography","score_opus":0.04652729262642284,"score_gpt":0.2834734837210126,"score_spread":0.23694619109458975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1482319075","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92613894,0.00018691503,0.07103012,0.0003399987,0.000023018265,0.000020509804,0.00030063896,0.00018828332,0.0017717015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99584466,0.000024902236,0.0039405255,0.000027450307,0.0000047738254,0.0000041849235,0.00008459057,0.0000065209338,0.00006246955],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972742,0.0013313241,0.00016916204,0.0005769135,0.00051970273,0.00012872693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97463,0.013061935,0.005390312,0.0037834658,0.0028150647,0.00031935095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007104265,0.00028555468,0.00037630947,0.00095894485,0.00040236898,0.0016870525,0.00092638476,0.00069901795,0.00060324924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03914336,0.00032862092,0.00034447663,0.0006425569,0.0011142407,0.0015769738,0.0011835857,0.00080172863,0.00020087772],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000215514,0.000054480657,0.7109889,0.00007285674,0.00028672692,0.00013408753,0.00052112306,0.24773775,0.003969667,0.0034181185,0.0008008596,0.031799965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015264695,0.00014755294,0.21085548,0.00007975271,0.000060789425,0.00029084604,0.00045588287,0.7690619,0.00382087,0.013801365,0.0013300438,0.00008027786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010718742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007493319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010718742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010217854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005931841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03757137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1482656807","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-263x.2010.00100.x","title":"Optimal conservation planning for migratory animals: integrating demographic information across seasons","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Government of Ontario; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Habitat; Threatened species; Population; Ecology; Habitat conservation; Warbler; Geography; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.015225423366526157,"score_gpt":0.2661472214290393,"score_spread":0.25092179806251314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1482656807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7857923,0.00067647814,0.20559041,0.001725298,0.000052498814,0.0001014559,0.000618349,0.00012622465,0.005317042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814144,0.00020521074,0.016861897,0.000056962905,0.000023492606,0.000041450723,0.0001570377,0.000017785229,0.0012217421],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994925,0.0002956764,0.00001587972,0.000075237265,0.00002599243,0.000094706586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844366,0.00087297615,0.00028062245,0.00005720279,0.00010440582,0.00024113404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018325242,0.00050650386,0.00097071286,0.0006784584,0.00039035094,0.0015438609,0.0010157175,0.0008505612,0.0026284393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004395225,0.0008576012,0.0005685908,0.0007038822,0.0007740861,0.0017188182,0.0007329915,0.00077043707,0.00012966408],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012597172,0.0000968096,0.010489068,0.00002436237,0.00009031473,0.00003557695,0.000051840238,0.9736432,0.00022336018,0.005240752,0.000492592,0.009486201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002227713,0.00006439411,0.0050631757,0.000009541027,0.000030654115,0.000014933683,0.00007307791,0.9877791,0.00004888093,0.0066857506,0.00019427967,0.000013887038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019947624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02528526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019947624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001621594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014374843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039663017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1485106432","doi":"10.1111/conl.12120","title":"Policy Options for the World's Primary Forests in Multilateral Environmental Agreements","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":196,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"World Wildlife Fund Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Deforestation (computer science); Biodiversity; Ecosystem services; Environmental resource management; Old-growth forest; Intact forest landscape; IUCN Red List; Geography; Agroforestry; Business; Natural resource economics; Forest ecology; Environmental protection; Ecosystem; Ecology; Forestry; Environmental science; Economics","score_opus":0.01075035468031903,"score_gpt":0.20931547976127582,"score_spread":0.19856512508095678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1485106432","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.115340635,0.0045986855,0.023275454,0.10577464,0.0010941405,0.00028862298,0.00028342663,0.0001453345,0.74919903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9645694,0.00091299677,0.0057006245,0.007722962,0.00021797766,0.00025655038,0.00008036759,0.0000266739,0.020512456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911344,0.0038676735,0.00032121112,0.00054248,0.0013795159,0.0027546608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99173623,0.0042984663,0.0007351421,0.00051084015,0.0012772206,0.0014421593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019471563,0.00045580312,0.0003764397,0.001435969,0.005625022,0.014591825,0.0017048824,0.005895899,0.013140687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01855266,0.0002671222,0.00061833614,0.0013013385,0.0035530357,0.0091044055,0.008292982,0.0047336994,0.0006320821],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043551972,0.000045321103,0.00082428503,0.000071969735,0.00001203536,0.0002835691,0.0011960478,0.003791407,0.0002772444,0.97471887,0.0064563793,0.012279269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061278355,0.000065108405,0.0026787857,0.00087733543,0.000033885106,0.00024770488,0.007457259,0.0063545066,0.0007316737,0.70546573,0.2759452,0.00008157216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071971463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013059632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019471563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007110099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010156864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10297674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1492691778","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-263x.2011.00186.x","title":"Mislabeling marine protected areas and why it matters—a case study of Australia","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"IUCN Red List; Marine protected area; IUCN protected area categories; Protected area; National park; Fishing; Recreation; Environmental resource management; Geography; Government (linguistics); Marine conservation; Fishery; Environmental planning; Environmental protection; Political science; Ecology; Environmental science; Law; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.05063313979631246,"score_gpt":0.25779874100820255,"score_spread":0.2071656012118901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1492691778","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9731233,0.0005288622,0.0010322526,0.009509511,0.000043034404,0.00013432467,0.000021947188,0.000006856731,0.01559986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989407,0.0009503642,0.0019121735,0.0018459142,0.000024817326,0.00009006006,0.000020865265,0.0000166942,0.0057321787],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908528,0.005964134,0.0003023182,0.0004639524,0.0013989175,0.0010179759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98766184,0.0069951997,0.0015338083,0.00049851916,0.002203374,0.0011073293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009910665,0.00038744343,0.00051862793,0.0018466946,0.014383688,0.0036619368,0.0020497697,0.0035503914,0.002124592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025710914,0.00055519305,0.0003273068,0.0030462374,0.0057949033,0.0034784954,0.0051576016,0.00380681,0.00021091985],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007767489,0.0008554019,0.07735696,0.00039932757,0.00003703703,0.048643213,0.77928966,0.00082629087,0.0012541128,0.030420925,0.008680013,0.052159358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017428178,0.00020702307,0.06191511,0.0006857327,0.00004003898,0.007376002,0.8665429,0.0028701755,0.00084606453,0.0054913205,0.05393519,0.00007299686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2366575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39638895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2366575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012485983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008295547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1496143141","doi":"10.1111/conl.12044","title":"A More Realistic Portrayal of Tropical Forestry: Response to Kormos and Zimmerman","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Logging; Stewardship (theology); Government (linguistics); Illegal logging; Forest management; Sustainable forest management; Tropics; Biodiversity; Business; Agroforestry; Subsidy; Tropical forest; Tropical and subtropical moist broadleaf forests; Community forestry; Deforestation (computer science); Geography; Forestry; Ecology; Political science; Politics; Environmental science","score_opus":0.009283638282152321,"score_gpt":0.20011900741446081,"score_spread":0.1908353691323085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1496143141","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021715323,0.0073045795,0.00025447947,0.9667819,0.025089191,0.000010288408,0.00008788354,0.000017565013,0.00023702865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00379824,0.0041251318,0.00053601514,0.965474,0.025423493,0.00006872493,0.000041725376,0.00005077961,0.00048179133],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.92770517,0.040245138,0.008172205,0.008228289,0.013432344,0.0022167584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.67240155,0.25628355,0.017479822,0.0077974196,0.03730519,0.008732487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.098373085,0.0022165752,0.004353076,0.004821208,0.0069496473,0.0137548195,0.008759699,0.043985453,0.010962493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32597077,0.0018522207,0.0034566298,0.004851251,0.014891989,0.02421331,0.012325838,0.08042321,0.0038721506],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018549334,0.000033264994,0.0008071719,0.0016404035,0.00023433444,0.0004415265,0.003841793,0.00016963277,0.00020404541,0.00878435,0.96676075,0.016897282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019591983,0.00012262572,0.0016875619,0.009676041,0.00036080633,0.0015239317,0.008244345,0.0005135383,0.0004288818,0.028138027,0.9487592,0.00034916992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0112451175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011016542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.098373085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008783836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009767218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5202528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1498872209","doi":"10.1111/conl.12019","title":"Response to Stevens and Jenkins’ pesticide impacts on bumblebees: a missing piece","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Insect and Pesticide Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Neonicotinoid; Bumblebee; Wildlife; Pesticide; Population; Biology; Geography; Toxicology; Imidacloprid; Ecology; Pollinator; Pollination; Demography","score_opus":0.03530064003292551,"score_gpt":0.2625052831595808,"score_spread":0.2272046431266553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1498872209","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6368381,0.10110547,0.005038635,0.19281504,0.006398902,0.00013682536,0.004348239,0.0004615866,0.052857265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9087425,0.038562384,0.0026962776,0.034144495,0.0019699486,0.00007823299,0.0015884252,0.000103542974,0.012114207],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992955,0.00012891946,0.00006235314,0.00017740717,0.00024144728,0.00009439525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963361,0.0012503259,0.0007107249,0.0003545622,0.00099819,0.00035011873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016792805,0.00040177046,0.00044448968,0.00051035424,0.0006721251,0.0013122795,0.0006893677,0.0012835787,0.010431364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005562474,0.00018146499,0.0004897346,0.0004596116,0.0006285977,0.0025276681,0.000789884,0.0015208487,0.0011895729],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008736364,0.00042078225,0.14025678,0.0031543097,0.0009032828,0.0004601809,0.004166978,0.00061876344,0.02316717,0.0042661387,0.11208717,0.7096247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021918564,0.0005323936,0.7928079,0.0016964132,0.00035626115,0.00038504836,0.0073246933,0.0005494806,0.0033547732,0.004956086,0.1878787,0.00013630048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012409273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016184459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012409273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072050974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008555525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034896433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1500797807","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-263x.2010.00111.x","title":"Reducing threats to species: threat reversibility and links to industry","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Prioritization; Business; Environmental resource management; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Scale (ratio); Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental planning; Natural resource economics; Computer science; Geography; Environmental science; Economics; Biology; Political science","score_opus":0.019356061819561305,"score_gpt":0.2518635917119528,"score_spread":0.23250752989239146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1500797807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9116643,0.0013139969,0.023902653,0.0076101925,0.000025049301,0.00014509064,0.0010672174,0.00009906464,0.054172534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994921,0.0002285756,0.0036772129,0.00008868313,0.000010831269,0.0000116318415,0.00008805453,0.0000048283387,0.00096906186],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831784,0.0006340188,0.000060344417,0.0000980049,0.00068503624,0.00020478874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900013,0.004202762,0.0028279657,0.00047249344,0.0019974946,0.00049798685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026735058,0.00042606893,0.00023547976,0.002359819,0.00075209216,0.002126961,0.00070547714,0.0004952002,0.0052440427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01133458,0.0001295929,0.00030974494,0.0017730101,0.0018687191,0.001790426,0.001417134,0.0010953774,0.00015507684],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052234624,0.00040265406,0.557713,0.00067526614,0.00034855012,0.00052830693,0.0015022898,0.1347239,0.009946442,0.07373741,0.0053106276,0.21458925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039285802,0.00055911916,0.83057094,0.00015393869,0.0001533318,0.00038370973,0.0039659194,0.07360875,0.0044271685,0.07285286,0.013160559,0.00012439898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.116478726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2614983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.116478726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046363943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003810209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23160154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1502961536","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-263x.2010.00129.x","title":"Public versus expert opinions regarding public involvement processes used in resource and wildlife management","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Bundesamt für Naturschutz","keywords":"Representativeness heuristic; Public involvement; Wildlife; Resource (disambiguation); Public opinion; Public relations; Business; Public land; Wildlife management; Task (project management); Environmental resource management; Psychology; Political science; Ecology; Social psychology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.08851780845499033,"score_gpt":0.262255074806901,"score_spread":0.1737372663519107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1502961536","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98477834,0.00037939707,0.0016910008,0.0027206433,0.00007138476,0.00006617026,0.00003071749,0.000013318705,0.010249026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99869627,0.00012460734,0.00034356563,0.0003096548,0.000034542398,0.00003453887,0.0000129697655,0.0000039184074,0.00043992652],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9556661,0.035036445,0.0017551265,0.00078995794,0.0050380593,0.00171425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8810684,0.090129256,0.013811311,0.002467132,0.00880199,0.003721964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03453358,0.00030409737,0.00031143217,0.0014783442,0.0015443962,0.0029358265,0.0005707001,0.0015305418,0.0041669565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07999054,0.00020119878,0.00035541353,0.0008082303,0.002282842,0.0017014107,0.002051006,0.0011379139,0.0003263191],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031603072,0.00083799404,0.3944817,0.0016365323,0.00036575258,0.0025209892,0.37808448,0.0024820445,0.012907679,0.009618789,0.010345931,0.18355781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028246507,0.0016084486,0.40477785,0.0018225006,0.00026817436,0.0016457881,0.5321498,0.0061353473,0.0044383425,0.0059322775,0.040664062,0.00027494828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017184026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023799208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03453358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016393018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087004196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18263316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1504212442","doi":"10.1111/conl.12020","title":"Pesticide impacts on bumblebee decline: a missing piece","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pollinator; Neonicotinoid; Census; Pesticide; Agriculture; Integrated pest management; Toxicology; Geography; Biology; Pollination; Imidacloprid; Population; Ecology; Environmental health; Medicine; Pollen","score_opus":0.050132660256583216,"score_gpt":0.22257360583004007,"score_spread":0.17244094557345685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1504212442","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.077614106,0.6218209,0.004195894,0.23066653,0.018122632,0.00023275147,0.019252876,0.00067424506,0.027419994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35927165,0.5007928,0.008671699,0.08250722,0.028528256,0.0002806647,0.010417624,0.00046894143,0.009061165],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99742043,0.0006039969,0.00038779844,0.0006832169,0.00061272644,0.00029176578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97381455,0.013292167,0.0028591033,0.0026809769,0.00602048,0.0013327154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073591834,0.0017317053,0.0023646129,0.002829481,0.0019975984,0.004671195,0.002235716,0.0053939195,0.027633717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018283628,0.0007746137,0.0019100587,0.0027900708,0.001764391,0.009963376,0.004989378,0.0059801796,0.003941337],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012147847,0.0006809994,0.05289154,0.021563655,0.0025229107,0.00070142094,0.0031616052,0.0015386507,0.0024560373,0.010254303,0.24353835,0.6594758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026485318,0.0011751921,0.33355016,0.04303987,0.003887393,0.0008522575,0.012971803,0.002249567,0.001809445,0.04024063,0.5594388,0.00051998603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020903833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018910656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027633717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017753222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035294793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.092444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1517645249","doi":"10.1111/conl.12109","title":"Communicating About Invasive Species: How “Driver” and “Passenger” Models Influence Public Willingness to Take Action","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Perception; Risk perception; Action (physics); Affect (linguistics); Willingness to pay; Willingness to accept; Moral responsibility; Business; Psychology; Political science; Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.48714581587812406,"score_gpt":0.39154459049337614,"score_spread":0.09560122538474791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1517645249","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99553335,0.000029893778,0.00037492678,0.00037504692,0.000007806517,0.000012977038,0.000008755935,0.000003996879,0.0036532679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997019,0.00002046943,0.000089304354,0.000042208252,0.0000025977538,0.000005816282,0.000004834073,0.0000016528525,0.00013104363],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99261224,0.0057249097,0.00019416468,0.00033439865,0.00071919494,0.00041508258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9665372,0.024521109,0.0052951938,0.00091638917,0.0015520337,0.0011780958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006627101,0.00032647283,0.00023202863,0.0006592413,0.0010617595,0.0035305643,0.0004595514,0.0012654262,0.0047158552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027268609,0.00028773607,0.00037751335,0.00028587558,0.0020325612,0.0019333463,0.0016161143,0.0016132871,0.00034409016],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009926081,0.0014599052,0.5582296,0.00032163557,0.00024355086,0.00083159975,0.39085892,0.0012687348,0.007664147,0.0060544987,0.0013404391,0.03073437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013546346,0.001211963,0.47951692,0.00033544112,0.00032250892,0.0005150356,0.48573256,0.013734276,0.0034167923,0.0062665814,0.008599819,0.00021249929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047448575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003960005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006627101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014028864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006680854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03504789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518407570","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-263x.2010.00145.x","title":"Salmon for terrestrial protected areas","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Simon Fraser University; University of Calgary; Raincoast Conservation Foundation","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Victoria; Wilburforce Foundation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Oncorhynchus; Riparian zone; Fishing; Fishery; Marine protected area; Limiting; Ecosystem; Upstream (networking); Environmental resource management; Ecology; Environmental science; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.012992244207954506,"score_gpt":0.21858027093054755,"score_spread":0.20558802672259305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1518407570","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04438758,0.00531648,0.0022477722,0.02256043,0.002402381,0.00057266996,0.0064516244,0.00063579314,0.91542524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24564362,0.004141766,0.011066349,0.014084939,0.001306801,0.0009169178,0.006295814,0.00020985387,0.71633404],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99980503,0.000050388637,0.000016976974,0.000028644232,0.000046313267,0.000052647134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994455,0.00008131231,0.000108059925,0.000076655706,0.00012470614,0.00016368696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005622802,0.00022598683,0.00014771713,0.0004985929,0.0008743498,0.00073796284,0.0004378335,0.00054165657,0.15619384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006544362,0.000088101646,0.0001462775,0.0004345698,0.00035681363,0.00042253485,0.001185256,0.0005282774,0.015952922],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013168943,0.00015704164,0.023241842,0.0009852963,0.0000288861,0.0005579579,0.0011974405,0.00022122715,0.0052337353,0.057774127,0.49433076,0.41614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016968235,0.00006516281,0.016236613,0.0001468681,0.000006992172,0.00016951861,0.0002678055,0.00007736105,0.00015696294,0.0012841731,0.98156655,0.0000050799663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041732793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016177708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15619384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004605337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012321807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5225204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1527635606","doi":"10.1111/conl.12105","title":"Vessel Strikes to Large Whales Before and After the 2008 Ship Strike Rule","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Response Biomedical (Canada); Nova Scotia Hospital","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Whale; Right whale; Fishery; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.011124645685857576,"score_gpt":0.2145722984126855,"score_spread":0.2034476527268279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1527635606","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985158,0.00005577992,0.00008296004,0.00008582005,0.000014325237,0.000003988566,0.00015109075,0.000004186823,0.0010861539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989818,0.000054924578,0.00009629465,0.00004655706,0.000012015173,0.00000449262,0.00026426098,0.0000013495302,0.0005382745],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99973756,0.000060972186,0.000023989394,0.000059325303,0.000070275404,0.000047887934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987191,0.00019485128,0.0005733982,0.00009859771,0.00025839265,0.0001557605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000517844,0.000087716035,0.00012760103,0.00034720363,0.00021150106,0.00035416108,0.00019920098,0.00022655574,0.00088095624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020006704,0.00006588393,0.00016124218,0.00020668913,0.0002526789,0.00024373057,0.0003039997,0.0002702804,0.0001242776],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022768394,0.000067235436,0.9819134,0.000018521423,0.000054920147,0.00011967941,0.00031425053,0.00039220793,0.0018182937,0.000062505336,0.0008886863,0.0141226575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010122263,0.000096428106,0.9989305,0.000004554839,0.0000064187725,0.000013477459,0.00029340966,0.00010705997,0.00015133468,0.000010117116,0.00038403907,0.0000016738685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02911412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.094973505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02911412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005375166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037423437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057889342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1531387312","doi":"10.1111/conl.12161","title":"Engaging Stakeholders: Assessing Accuracy of Participatory Mapping of Land Cover in Panama","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ford Foundation; David and Lucile Packard Foundation","keywords":"Citizen journalism; Land cover; Indigenous; Environmental resource management; Remote sensing; Geography; Decision tree; Identification (biology); Cover (algebra); Land use; Environmental planning; Computer science; Environmental science; Data mining; Ecology","score_opus":0.19642097513314508,"score_gpt":0.2748519872787323,"score_spread":0.0784310121455872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1531387312","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909793,0.000107368476,0.004680692,0.000119116696,0.000012018536,0.00013665589,0.00014646839,0.000058217833,0.00376007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99538285,0.00003697581,0.0041758427,0.000012549206,0.00000581357,0.000103150254,0.00009966725,0.0000056268973,0.00017748828],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98555726,0.0100033395,0.0007487572,0.0015261979,0.0017459233,0.00041858724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9552758,0.029069478,0.006635048,0.0036800033,0.0047881515,0.0005516008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020137781,0.00051855674,0.00034879323,0.002236063,0.0011945354,0.0019506485,0.0007848084,0.00071336864,0.0011085548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057219148,0.00030597957,0.00032915018,0.0014861992,0.0010383857,0.0020098006,0.0029905094,0.00037389845,0.00021339317],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009366556,0.00020026245,0.80897313,0.00042993925,0.0003306922,0.00040743212,0.03461055,0.0063734744,0.004390653,0.0007807839,0.0007077726,0.1418588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058835783,0.00073810015,0.8963913,0.00029812276,0.00016632225,0.00036075036,0.041522533,0.04734722,0.0044671074,0.0028708654,0.005689091,0.000089786095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008492632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012404481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020137781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066211727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042636838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10650009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1546179703","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-263x.2010.00125.x","title":"The changing landscape of conservation science funding in the United States","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Total Foundation; Australian Government; Society for Conservation Biology; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Cedar Tree Foundation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Pace; Conservation science; Government (linguistics); Political science; Citizen science; Recession; Socioeconomic status; Geography; Environmental planning; Economic growth; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Economics; Sociology; Biodiversity; Biology; Population","score_opus":0.027956979815795004,"score_gpt":0.2520069502530693,"score_spread":0.2240499704372743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1546179703","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94270366,0.0033533724,0.0005567169,0.032221764,0.00011956298,0.000019980827,0.00068721286,0.00002485362,0.020312864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966317,0.0008119315,0.0005173379,0.0011645771,0.00006157308,0.000021295979,0.0001961607,0.0000063181146,0.0005891821],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949733,0.0021834522,0.0003559442,0.0004429489,0.0012678988,0.0007764249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9726379,0.008413512,0.0073504546,0.0006985476,0.007929948,0.0029695618],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008126726,0.0001022663,0.00025288714,0.0042366115,0.0017673251,0.0030178947,0.0005878858,0.00076558115,0.0024631806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021240748,0.00019241234,0.00014346588,0.005127775,0.0014736482,0.001478911,0.0021386568,0.00091679924,0.0001510529],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023390363,0.00012511853,0.8233468,0.00022171752,0.000100221296,0.00054364203,0.008266038,0.0010620297,0.0011867454,0.023851646,0.020171557,0.12089062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022692668,0.00006880968,0.9305619,0.00053022744,0.00003595794,0.00033372274,0.013767587,0.0010778519,0.00033802385,0.0034077787,0.049810335,0.0000451462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042388186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08490837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99187326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046545817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004615126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.084282935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1546373907","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-263x.2009.00050.x","title":"Conservation science for impact: the first year of <i>Conservation Letters</i>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globe; Publication; Mainstream; Diversity (politics); Population; Political science; Geography; Library science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.023220181777404095,"score_gpt":0.255140570654612,"score_spread":0.2319203888772079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1546373907","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001911279,0.006265839,0.0004890746,0.15635227,0.8224333,0.00007615263,0.00034194594,0.0004537638,0.0133965835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006663769,0.010681092,0.001734578,0.20355779,0.68116486,0.0002646876,0.0011782516,0.0016166564,0.09313835],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9764994,0.0030251255,0.0018157366,0.00181923,0.014031509,0.002808994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8602593,0.021340715,0.0073253484,0.0065022153,0.062795565,0.04177685],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02374814,0.002632161,0.0027553402,0.0059075174,0.008213076,0.05243189,0.0040840125,0.015999746,0.091523185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08687262,0.0012891374,0.0025521065,0.0051992857,0.005626721,0.013528495,0.0074248924,0.022487976,0.045753263],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027326989,0.000013255831,0.000057327565,0.00013995681,0.000008423083,0.0000490365,0.000048320107,0.000018268953,0.00009112942,0.0011009023,0.9884453,0.010000699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014515469,0.000041260162,0.0003460088,0.0003150251,0.000007151898,0.000070762755,0.0001293244,0.000036214187,0.0000885565,0.0020329794,0.9969001,0.000017998003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030589274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004669529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97625184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010421544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01716492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30617553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1548585674","doi":"10.1111/conl.12085","title":"Mass Media Influence and the Regulation of Illegal Practices in the Seafood Market","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Identification and Quantification in Food","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"European Regional Development Fund; Higher Education Authority","keywords":"Business; Enforcement; Mass media; Production (economics); Product (mathematics); Compliance (psychology); Advertising; Marketing; Economics; Political science; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.01718877411191276,"score_gpt":0.25331553662751005,"score_spread":0.23612676251559728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1548585674","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9172242,0.00051562936,0.0008411637,0.0029927827,0.00006302395,0.000038108283,0.00005618515,0.000018731569,0.07825014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997997,0.00010183649,0.00012408904,0.00018010531,0.000045133547,0.0000071173276,0.000007390848,0.000004562724,0.0015328353],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941764,0.0034932732,0.00022127743,0.00039121704,0.0013291,0.00038865223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93479466,0.040036842,0.0172713,0.0028546732,0.004035055,0.0010074794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00508464,0.00019522055,0.00017453218,0.0020723892,0.0017447817,0.0048032086,0.0005767868,0.0013231339,0.0060293116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025032723,0.00022185827,0.00019629173,0.0008394115,0.0045863492,0.0016428909,0.0014407049,0.0012806149,0.0004827669],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022087458,0.0017040571,0.56740737,0.0004825195,0.00021184159,0.0037528449,0.11045984,0.00091874757,0.027049847,0.0690399,0.0051323343,0.21163203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000094664974,0.0007499139,0.8423574,0.0005434999,0.00013052135,0.0009768035,0.06736904,0.0026225292,0.014147281,0.013263728,0.057617586,0.00012701044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006950141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049057966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006950141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021036472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010512953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026890457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1553161969","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-263x.2009.00074.x","title":"Temperate marine reserves: global ecological effects and guidelines for future networks","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council","keywords":"Marine reserve; Temperate climate; Nature reserve; Species richness; Marine protected area; Biomass (ecology); Ecology; Fishing; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Marine conservation; Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.020478928259357283,"score_gpt":0.26445440108139046,"score_spread":0.24397547282203316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1553161969","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15370874,0.020266851,0.35961133,0.121050835,0.0022882603,0.0061375033,0.0066440864,0.0027966679,0.32749578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54570407,0.0039602,0.42224133,0.0036768408,0.00050694373,0.005905565,0.0025054226,0.00036413118,0.015135488],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897433,0.0065325825,0.0011925022,0.0005365764,0.0015625497,0.0004325082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9469402,0.022416068,0.0051252353,0.005418717,0.016122209,0.0039775167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030012181,0.0008395083,0.00057245465,0.00299364,0.0017155085,0.003931346,0.0028321338,0.0015301906,0.010360229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05606676,0.00053259823,0.00055603345,0.0022445815,0.002292161,0.005164136,0.0035452028,0.001521336,0.00078853336],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037571252,0.00023637344,0.105898395,0.0021442813,0.000108535205,0.00063003355,0.0067361253,0.023079677,0.0031212396,0.35695416,0.13286576,0.36784968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002336935,0.00082983443,0.17490889,0.008735271,0.00032637542,0.0012974495,0.013336008,0.030987537,0.002357979,0.19336872,0.5733913,0.00022697795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013426208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039657522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030012181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024294055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046505807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15872145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1553786625","doi":"10.1111/conl.12165","title":"Domestic Policy Focus Highly Important For Protecting Primary Forests","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; Ducks Unlimited Canada; Trent University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Natural resource economics; Business; Environmental protection; Environmental resource management; Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.022791625738664167,"score_gpt":0.25882861232660936,"score_spread":0.2360369865879452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1553786625","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0064597405,0.024968864,0.008843618,0.6388287,0.0119665535,0.000057636564,0.00028121396,0.0001897719,0.30840385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.231858,0.015530075,0.013529424,0.6559482,0.005755364,0.00015994975,0.0003926575,0.00039476086,0.076431684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905358,0.0031606357,0.00033831145,0.0014554925,0.0023648082,0.002144923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870428,0.0051140627,0.0010496684,0.0011328177,0.003563609,0.0020970264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011563659,0.0007698393,0.00083672587,0.0009451822,0.0063063367,0.014475322,0.0018254085,0.012403137,0.022448132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01699161,0.00044071212,0.00078911363,0.00121672,0.005787367,0.012569943,0.006367968,0.015417024,0.0051830676],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004066978,0.0001133516,0.0020184745,0.0007494645,0.000054597156,0.00047425856,0.0037699947,0.00044788566,0.0016943585,0.5398956,0.37426862,0.07647273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008153532,0.000017137614,0.0015681429,0.0008560492,0.000037164573,0.00025014763,0.0021251137,0.00017539764,0.000657352,0.06830446,0.92597383,0.000027066411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01241907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022659166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022448132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006561457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013985802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07509643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1557459380","doi":"10.1111/conl.12035","title":"Oceans at Rio+20","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Environmental resource management; Constructive; Corporate governance; Biodiversity; Marine protected area; Environmental planning; Scale (ratio); Political science; Relation (database); Biodiversity conservation; Geography; Business; Ecology; Environmental science; Law; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.01145268005881115,"score_gpt":0.1856323458662459,"score_spread":0.17417966580743477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1557459380","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18039374,0.0017147092,0.0017940248,0.09011392,0.004805686,0.00032240024,0.0016884697,0.00032080078,0.7188463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8331334,0.0011448184,0.0024722607,0.023870636,0.0009526006,0.00047062628,0.0015177304,0.00048632835,0.13595156],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967368,0.0013242909,0.00008537858,0.00016393211,0.0009119103,0.0007775051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947743,0.0016474323,0.0005639198,0.0004486001,0.0009748708,0.0015909207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005630612,0.00017431896,0.00021149339,0.00047224184,0.0040446226,0.0034969521,0.00073746085,0.0019367804,0.02387019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011862691,0.000104590654,0.00033442967,0.0007386714,0.0024245419,0.0011353851,0.006894194,0.0029691178,0.0017100037],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00060113776,0.00021748856,0.03446494,0.0018284984,0.00006193534,0.0051687686,0.11286866,0.0015288739,0.00573491,0.15354614,0.52718073,0.15679795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012899321,0.000043661694,0.012046824,0.00014906723,0.0000052696173,0.0001382768,0.01774601,0.000082641476,0.000453505,0.0032203896,0.96607745,0.000024014242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014556735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022320088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02387019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031700463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051822565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07985377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1567507933","doi":"10.1111/conl.12043","title":"Response to: Putz <i>et al., Sustaining Conservation Values in Selectively Logged Tropical Forests: The Attained and the Attainable</i>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"World Wildlife Fund Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Logging; Deforestation (computer science); Agroforestry; Illegal logging; Rainforest; Business; Biodiversity; Agriculture; Natural resource economics; Environmental science; Geography; Ecology; Forestry; Economics; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.008435776250765902,"score_gpt":0.20942930886903732,"score_spread":0.2009935326182714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1567507933","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00042019965,0.0010558687,0.00010788007,0.9640328,0.030917743,0.0001450387,0.00080692023,0.00016903123,0.002344452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017423631,0.0009362668,0.00023074966,0.9717979,0.014554366,0.00027973295,0.00023519491,0.00006533544,0.010158066],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978356,0.00047952862,0.00024608732,0.0002974183,0.00070815586,0.000433306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989956,0.0033420508,0.0009371547,0.00027870963,0.0033520977,0.0021340274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004271302,0.0015863949,0.0017405339,0.0009339801,0.0039196424,0.005002142,0.0039485204,0.043459363,0.05890687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023301113,0.00084095023,0.0012562966,0.00079298747,0.0028831474,0.0062629036,0.005322801,0.032500137,0.020345356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031837157,0.000022435343,0.00018485574,0.00012173137,0.0000033438048,0.00008268522,0.00013424823,0.000021751011,0.00008576004,0.00019176328,0.99631906,0.0028006923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011928794,0.00009235985,0.0018035921,0.0006976266,0.000016974078,0.0004099759,0.002511202,0.00024261147,0.00022747871,0.0015020893,0.9922678,0.00010895423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0107063055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013057813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05890687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00403301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007835163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19706309},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1570161875","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-263x.2012.00300.x","title":"Ecological restoration and enabling behavior: a new metaphorical lens?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Liber Ero Foundation","keywords":"Restoration ecology; Metaphor; Liberian dollar; Novel ecosystem; Ecosystem; Dependency (UML); Environmental restoration; Through-the-lens metering; Business; Environmental resource management; Lens (geology); Ecology; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.061933810328511106,"score_gpt":0.2553051426806973,"score_spread":0.1933713323521862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1570161875","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0890349,0.012280238,0.08862278,0.23634696,0.0027372825,0.000077737684,0.00010454833,0.00015065704,0.57064486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823161,0.0018116513,0.006767933,0.0032825766,0.00036305762,0.000078149176,0.000014031193,0.000032177195,0.00533448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953492,0.0037715796,0.00005974894,0.00015365834,0.00041473116,0.00025108986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969837,0.0018062037,0.00037579413,0.00021805672,0.00026376158,0.00035254093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003982913,0.0007339511,0.00043783244,0.0021076268,0.003903405,0.0054683513,0.0012397753,0.0028339294,0.004157355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044040605,0.00024361977,0.0005073809,0.0015059742,0.045864347,0.010100894,0.003949072,0.0047526346,0.0003216085],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053755452,0.000007750241,0.000048546946,0.000019023733,0.0000011801617,0.000044299388,0.0050026053,0.000060811944,0.000049137332,0.99333644,0.00073288,0.0006920493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022668135,0.000027326409,0.00027859837,0.00014491752,0.0000061373617,0.00026995598,0.019270249,0.0009949767,0.00012501693,0.89564073,0.0832,0.000019360608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018935971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017630013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054683513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039850096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020855912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028913379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1575567785","doi":"10.1111/conl.12093","title":"Quantifying Ecological Life Support: The Biological Efficacy of Alternative Supplementation Strategies for Imperiled Amphibian Populations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Amphibian and Reptile Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Government of British Columbia; Ministry of Environment; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Extinction (optical mineralogy); Amphibian; Biology; Biodiversity; Ecology; Captive breeding; Metamorphosis; Endangered species; Larva; Habitat","score_opus":0.08941895418178912,"score_gpt":0.3165548996294195,"score_spread":0.22713594544763038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1575567785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965731,0.0000910924,0.0025288863,0.00008320011,0.0000023628584,0.0000074594423,0.00013283362,0.000012696007,0.00056831393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989807,0.00001776332,0.00089311955,0.0000074627874,0.0000016010392,0.0000037246086,0.00003944119,0.0000011180296,0.00005516621],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944156,0.00036104163,0.000018410567,0.00009593548,0.000047236703,0.000035824683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99510527,0.0029382838,0.0013321356,0.00020728064,0.00017823606,0.00023874425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016516179,0.00028318487,0.00025521804,0.0006791118,0.00022533555,0.0008899694,0.00064867956,0.00047019383,0.0012178859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070244893,0.00015036338,0.0003187593,0.00040110387,0.00046073413,0.0008565313,0.0005438456,0.00029874322,0.00006419803],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00089208997,0.00042855678,0.57302415,0.00015927052,0.0008572533,0.00011961106,0.0002579233,0.39019567,0.0057126055,0.0042114058,0.0004445811,0.023696944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055241788,0.0013655012,0.23558913,0.00003662803,0.00029264376,0.00013234955,0.00057582837,0.75405264,0.0017245453,0.005472811,0.00065663556,0.00004601792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072885705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014947156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072885705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006995828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038662803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014492273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1585639325","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-263x.2012.00294.x","title":"Multiple pathways to conservation success","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Island University; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Overexploitation; Process (computing); Environmental resource management; Soundness; Action plan; Order (exchange); Environmental planning; Action (physics); Conservation science; Political science; Geography; Business; Ecology; Biology; Habitat; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.04606571118475085,"score_gpt":0.2417566564258102,"score_spread":0.19569094524105934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1585639325","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6011342,0.0021145102,0.012440384,0.032890823,0.00017540282,0.00027584817,0.0005956312,0.00021210914,0.35016105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949313,0.00039300896,0.0014785709,0.00023173114,0.000034138127,0.00004540328,0.00006600207,0.000020888088,0.0027989992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946432,0.0022787245,0.00030282885,0.00071065733,0.0011801673,0.00088438304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96635365,0.01895666,0.0052944883,0.0022346564,0.0042408207,0.002919684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061775926,0.0003350587,0.00033251615,0.005233271,0.0033423717,0.010727711,0.0009971866,0.0015225614,0.022863416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02582385,0.00035900314,0.00027843867,0.005170583,0.0133056715,0.009486233,0.006832835,0.0022817,0.0011854932],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014362384,0.00022453332,0.15178804,0.0007322873,0.00011903518,0.0014112206,0.09866243,0.0015946657,0.0010524578,0.6241006,0.0064566843,0.11371443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030775922,0.00013163428,0.13350092,0.00094693474,0.00005933607,0.00060708233,0.13569653,0.002296888,0.0009376509,0.62341386,0.10224614,0.00013234069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026057817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037176637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022863416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032515933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028086023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07648575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1596627028","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-263x.2011.00193.x","title":"Forest conservation and restoration using eco‐loan financing (ELF) in Costa Rica: report on a working model","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministry of Environment; Tides Canada","keywords":"Business; Loan; Finance; Reforestation; Agroforestry; Forestry; Geography","score_opus":0.063530302680215,"score_gpt":0.2169897588593977,"score_spread":0.1534594561791827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1596627028","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8845639,0.0025763875,0.0024614993,0.020046948,0.00009069545,0.0024378584,0.0013065626,0.00018998665,0.08632616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9775145,0.0018461852,0.0044819796,0.001546884,0.00003038589,0.0010670461,0.0008291845,0.00002005097,0.012663796],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99731916,0.0012786518,0.000053657386,0.00014713718,0.00032651157,0.00087495847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99662626,0.0008165411,0.00022570087,0.0003868782,0.0007044928,0.0012401432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007777589,0.00054167793,0.00021977563,0.0008749094,0.0021590907,0.0032746303,0.0018766222,0.0012664727,0.0033744501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004507289,0.00023783157,0.0004444401,0.00094919215,0.0010426273,0.0013651333,0.0022133305,0.0007806021,0.00030745508],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011316083,0.0070694434,0.33079773,0.0010359739,0.00030778936,0.0022788048,0.008893611,0.0241148,0.0033307588,0.05590048,0.0640685,0.50107044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017651415,0.0028102945,0.68511397,0.0013724831,0.00041260198,0.0009322885,0.028410587,0.040076684,0.0063441666,0.010802669,0.22172786,0.00023122087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27027467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23021904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27027467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007574889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019590516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.537403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599033642","doi":"10.1111/conl.12009","title":"Rapid ecosystem change and polar bear conservation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"World Wildlife Fund Canada; York University; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Habitat; Population; Environmental resource management; Ecosystem; Arctic; Ecology; Marine ecosystem; Geography; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.037197071074198396,"score_gpt":0.20781039195912826,"score_spread":0.17061332088492986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1599033642","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11788239,0.20882182,0.0040408494,0.2767934,0.0053332574,0.00008042376,0.00069110945,0.0001250801,0.38623166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83933467,0.11949615,0.00245417,0.013064003,0.004378665,0.00004275547,0.00027993962,0.00002024114,0.020929273],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99975556,0.00010848517,0.000010978944,0.000025234514,0.000047844565,0.000052015228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939454,0.00019586178,0.0001604993,0.00003330833,0.00008973442,0.00012611151],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008878215,0.00015101414,0.00011634103,0.0005541877,0.00047082306,0.0017998932,0.0002144851,0.00054309476,0.007517868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00084545003,0.000055662073,0.00012149959,0.00064870145,0.0009583338,0.0014141127,0.0013710989,0.00077127194,0.00029742916],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000928032,0.00011857763,0.04617508,0.00095482066,0.00012310865,0.00077200757,0.0018860339,0.0020732943,0.0008369719,0.21646051,0.17123915,0.5592677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015468107,0.00009975885,0.06829055,0.00095496036,0.000036583286,0.0009474745,0.0038768216,0.0006776092,0.0005152941,0.080158986,0.8443993,0.000027244167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039011326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007685578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007517868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072143145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056527054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025149822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1605878099","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-263x.2012.00259.x","title":"Willing or unwilling to share primary biodiversity data: results and implications of an international survey","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Research Data Management Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Data sharing; Standardization; Biodiversity; Data quality; Publishing; Business; Survey data collection; Computer science; Environmental resource management; Internet privacy; Marketing; Political science; Ecology; Medicine","score_opus":0.3041531773281683,"score_gpt":0.3848607261312832,"score_spread":0.08070754880311487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1605878099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99486285,0.00015565082,0.00031244213,0.0010487512,0.000019633884,0.0000763471,0.0001887032,0.000005773673,0.0033296898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985812,0.00021815859,0.00024003787,0.00040932643,0.000012566043,0.00009907721,0.00010495923,0.000007326151,0.00032731812],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9802389,0.010716367,0.002789921,0.0011346769,0.003307011,0.0018132403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88425815,0.061320487,0.031894978,0.004301873,0.01267316,0.0055513843],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023009248,0.00032142183,0.00045144532,0.0026529613,0.0016494588,0.002770652,0.0009925256,0.000972828,0.0036875498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06857656,0.00036593,0.0005094398,0.003404042,0.0020315864,0.0034296836,0.0022831887,0.0016519963,0.00063147844],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001938324,0.00044150624,0.87795603,0.000319034,0.00007341349,0.00060326327,0.09790669,0.00008740278,0.0005984401,0.000501798,0.0018519233,0.019466659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021233831,0.0005178846,0.54025996,0.00040220848,0.00004875742,0.0009839933,0.4493887,0.0005735063,0.00065670005,0.00036014317,0.0067148292,0.00007213058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004714336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029518958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99900746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009156762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013179547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12168604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1606822966","doi":"10.1111/conl.12092","title":"Transgenerational Effects of Parental Rearing Environment Influence the Survivorship of Captive‐Born Offspring in the Wild","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bedford Institute of Oceanography; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds en Fiducie pour la Faune du Nouveau-Brunswick","keywords":"Survivorship curve; Offspring; Biology; Endangered species; Transgenerational epigenetics; Salmo; Captive breeding; Population; Natural population growth; Captivity; Zoology; Ecology; Fishery; Demography; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Habitat; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.00867778798877008,"score_gpt":0.18608869863415076,"score_spread":0.17741091064538067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1606822966","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99904853,0.00009693169,0.00040755863,0.000015053584,0.000006023762,0.0000031336906,0.00006022921,0.000007473209,0.000355005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999064,0.000063009444,0.00032925542,0.00004460894,0.0000028571553,0.000008580655,0.00010995773,0.0000065814947,0.0003711013],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998338,0.000058633133,0.000009610763,0.000045364206,0.000031609005,0.0000209342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937904,0.00018659391,0.00014169565,0.000099234894,0.00008634086,0.000107125816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003300382,0.0002040097,0.00011684021,0.00031431238,0.00018011076,0.00028964676,0.00027573985,0.00013781499,0.0010639607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044453098,0.00009754568,0.00011553333,0.000100587495,0.00028922898,0.00015951673,0.00023263313,0.00032222507,0.00010436907],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004835074,0.00032495937,0.13999969,0.000049445425,0.00012724039,0.00042002043,0.00044285774,0.0002863882,0.84432274,0.00016210212,0.00026809698,0.0131129725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008313937,0.0010751158,0.93367296,0.000019484452,0.00010258448,0.00034051706,0.0005916464,0.0011112706,0.062248394,0.00008146676,0.0007334991,0.000014735548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001998807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051597017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001998807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019958332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012500749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0039743185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1633999785","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-263x.2009.00080.x","title":"Effects of logging on fire regimes in moist forests","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Logging; Biodiversity; Context (archaeology); Fire regime; Environmental science; Microclimate; Rainforest; Salvage logging; Fire ecology; Ecology; Natural (archaeology); Agroforestry; Geography; Environmental resource management; Forest ecology; Ecosystem; Forestry; Biology","score_opus":0.005064950469806403,"score_gpt":0.20048037337539926,"score_spread":0.19541542290559286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1633999785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99828374,0.00019652655,0.00009625481,0.00006969555,0.0000051767033,0.0000028423672,0.0000749103,0.000002332809,0.0012685967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99970657,0.00006575834,0.000034779347,0.00003275953,0.000010247278,0.0000011812932,0.000038492042,8.541706e-7,0.000109293964],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999701,0.00015371454,0.000029410692,0.000031314506,0.00003459727,0.000050029084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966324,0.0016021539,0.0011679117,0.00011398593,0.00016826857,0.00031535496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006689984,0.00009392378,0.00015890949,0.00042097172,0.00023770779,0.00052085257,0.00012169451,0.00018280811,0.002403571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027809436,0.000073204006,0.00017189364,0.00034363449,0.00040053355,0.00036178264,0.00033079134,0.00023881638,0.00019658037],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007736481,0.00015337601,0.9773573,0.000052575535,0.0001322716,0.0002082868,0.00020171126,0.0007815782,0.004445211,0.00018188023,0.00020981015,0.015502391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054629804,0.00008775891,0.99887675,0.0000059363797,0.000015091412,0.0000879444,0.000107353146,0.00026614006,0.00019711963,0.00017920017,0.00016840802,0.0000028572845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017655032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004281972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002403571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017839663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009850435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008040726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1647751881","doi":"10.1111/conl.12069","title":"Technocratic and Economic Ideals in the Ecosystem Services Discourse","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Commodification; Technocracy; Monetization; Ecosystem services; Sociology; Variety (cybernetics); Epistemology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Economics; Ecosystem; Computer science; Ecology; Biology; Law; Economy","score_opus":0.00595099816671642,"score_gpt":0.21095453694069405,"score_spread":0.20500353877397762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1647751881","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04667446,0.014449447,0.020459946,0.614419,0.0026217632,0.000050560193,0.00011747035,0.0000547572,0.3011526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9205376,0.007813707,0.008778658,0.043929484,0.0031549584,0.00022637346,0.00008923116,0.00012965895,0.015340301],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9808288,0.012882776,0.0006214702,0.0010750006,0.00340942,0.0011825326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97283417,0.021529451,0.0019081265,0.0009999722,0.0018248564,0.00090358313],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022736428,0.00083825574,0.00063353166,0.0039064484,0.010014166,0.022965,0.0025970617,0.010569387,0.0056149866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019207489,0.00041002178,0.0006493218,0.0044150148,0.0723929,0.02478588,0.010835776,0.011063538,0.0008528267],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031121822,0.000006498468,0.000096264004,0.00003066027,0.0000014018636,0.000048296268,0.023203801,0.00004264863,0.00002651659,0.9735381,0.0017800998,0.0012225641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001227892,0.000010986532,0.00047951267,0.00048310534,0.00000777314,0.00016196746,0.03665751,0.00042057023,0.00023561655,0.72716665,0.23433892,0.000025128476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075072832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067912736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9899858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010813071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007797329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12024319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1714244779","doi":"10.1111/conl.12010","title":"Systematic Conservation Planning: A Better Recipe for Managing the High Seas for Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Use","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":155,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; University of Victoria","funders":"Australian Research Council; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Australian Government; James Hutton Institute","keywords":"Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Mandate; Business; Ecosystem-based management; Biodiversity; Sustainability; Jurisdiction; Sustainable development; Convention on Biological Diversity; Ecosystem; Geography; Political science; Environmental science; Ecology","score_opus":0.02138574752349896,"score_gpt":0.2030849119687206,"score_spread":0.18169916444522166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1714244779","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033707358,0.008153149,0.17674664,0.5990086,0.0019382692,0.0011472777,0.00028843957,0.0005068374,0.1785033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6737528,0.0068123774,0.27301243,0.027806502,0.0006783461,0.0008216265,0.00038826218,0.00019072214,0.016536962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9853129,0.00968038,0.0006775065,0.0006034794,0.0028572008,0.0008686357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97258097,0.009272044,0.0039398354,0.004870525,0.006194647,0.0031421233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024442183,0.0006060812,0.0005354569,0.0033259792,0.005283303,0.010693328,0.001713085,0.0024242094,0.008390017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023792123,0.00051902427,0.00068827375,0.0026161713,0.013190843,0.007475056,0.006092625,0.005661433,0.0006323918],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026752921,0.00021135095,0.01508283,0.0008013586,0.000100233614,0.00037834965,0.008117232,0.0081416415,0.00071158714,0.6595825,0.12663019,0.1802159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004718127,0.00014501372,0.015092442,0.0028346071,0.000044919554,0.0002745363,0.024023473,0.004012644,0.0006404947,0.56493807,0.38783714,0.00010943944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022884686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054228593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024442183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066582565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0580553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12926418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1745651044","doi":"10.1111/conl.12197","title":"Bombing for Biodiversity in the United States: Response to Zentelis &amp; Lindenmayer 2015","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Geography; Environmental resource management; National park; Ecosystem services; Land use; Ecology; Environmental protection; Ecosystem; Environmental science; Archaeology; Biology","score_opus":0.05379193206246376,"score_gpt":0.2810005044978889,"score_spread":0.22720857243542514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1745651044","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20412113,0.014093818,0.00075551914,0.69596624,0.0060697105,0.0002404487,0.0075411657,0.00032680447,0.07088511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65353936,0.014832102,0.0030653474,0.2807175,0.002836953,0.00054310804,0.0069777337,0.00014238199,0.037345555],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979924,0.00056358526,0.00011027283,0.00022330516,0.00070834253,0.00040210612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99445313,0.0012473133,0.0010499255,0.00018810346,0.0010414667,0.0020200398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003557646,0.00031491017,0.00021181992,0.0010243478,0.0039869044,0.003392228,0.0011193297,0.0025432138,0.009831629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01066546,0.00028425848,0.00031406345,0.0011032542,0.0012796932,0.001749085,0.0048205424,0.0046648327,0.00088173465],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006765718,0.000176401,0.07283784,0.00028337908,0.000046600384,0.0003488163,0.0050474135,0.00028903384,0.0003766018,0.004757114,0.83522063,0.080548495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033290267,0.00018384674,0.27593037,0.001664172,0.00004426061,0.0002774767,0.025850965,0.0013338649,0.0005979823,0.0038211916,0.6901425,0.00011998648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10884861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25010696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10884861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059902985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008077523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21643007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1805636449","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-263x.2010.00120.x","title":"Exposure of Africa's freshwater biodiversity to a changing climate","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Climate change; Freshwater fish; Freshwater ecosystem; Surface runoff; Environmental science; Ecosystem; Ecology; Ecosystem services; Water resources; Geography; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Fishery; Biology","score_opus":0.009904554907198103,"score_gpt":0.1851347054356531,"score_spread":0.175230150528455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1805636449","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992895,0.000029220535,0.000060498445,0.000042045802,6.409244e-7,0.0000017742115,0.00016713416,0.0000016701383,0.00040748416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998386,0.000022902126,0.000035933987,0.000006028871,8.5147576e-7,0.0000015023916,0.00006676768,2.5234422e-7,0.000027192074],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99986255,0.00005035469,0.000005923505,0.00002215766,0.000019587811,0.000039383467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994005,0.00014278361,0.00029369694,0.00003631932,0.000058847825,0.00006792853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023128913,0.00010336299,0.00010369271,0.00046725097,0.00027336177,0.00045412607,0.000109972156,0.000107710184,0.0017553254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010615865,0.000047095346,0.00012495588,0.0007167267,0.00021478409,0.0002657449,0.0005118901,0.00012619136,0.000050028848],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004357269,0.000013130943,0.9874364,0.000021988117,0.00006795798,0.00015777696,0.00025528503,0.002261768,0.0024192156,0.00014921605,0.0001318809,0.007041776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016371606,0.000038306694,0.9977679,0.0000062889153,0.000009876252,0.00008944648,0.00042198092,0.0008588689,0.0002072939,0.0001280226,0.0004668803,0.0000034562902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0105425175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010623408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0105425175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036009072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017223868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020962298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1825939435","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-263x.2010.00109.x","title":"Making conservation physiology relevant to policy makers and conservation practitioners","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":181,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Toolbox; Process (computing); Conservation biology; Conservation science; Biology; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.034982365257095055,"score_gpt":0.28726998864121306,"score_spread":0.25228762338411803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1825939435","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032560155,0.0028650546,0.004326153,0.96969604,0.0035741567,0.000052185896,0.000033206004,0.00005095893,0.01614617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48732018,0.028573386,0.025059842,0.42553478,0.018583195,0.0004219005,0.00018011905,0.00012509646,0.014201483],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9819749,0.012759855,0.0006961009,0.00090366404,0.00254877,0.001116642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9046593,0.062404342,0.0073432312,0.003704812,0.013982282,0.007906109],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043480925,0.00068067334,0.00091352453,0.002467308,0.0053199204,0.019051569,0.0023689193,0.01662515,0.012659239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09586302,0.00053924933,0.0004822044,0.0014556111,0.023334676,0.019123089,0.008044671,0.012248392,0.0024503036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018870302,0.0004811578,0.009362314,0.0013233286,0.000083678504,0.0012345735,0.010593678,0.0047331704,0.0025449267,0.35397813,0.39260048,0.22287588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000566151,0.00011771456,0.0057918793,0.0027976038,0.000046384677,0.00030953938,0.020543613,0.0020150903,0.0010551533,0.5741384,0.39299795,0.00012996752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038113426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030533893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043480925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00585597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0184762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2299518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1826695102","doi":"10.1111/conl.12090","title":"A Social Relational Network Perspective for MPA Science","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Waterloo","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Social network (sociolinguistics); Corporate governance; Social network analysis; Social capital; Frontier; Knowledge management; Sociology; Business; Computer science; Political science; Social science; Social media","score_opus":0.02139356785157386,"score_gpt":0.24514589071063383,"score_spread":0.22375232285905997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1826695102","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02908918,0.2723443,0.27003145,0.103547275,0.0039140168,0.00025746034,0.0005534069,0.00016525238,0.32009763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6828825,0.23420553,0.055762164,0.0059471815,0.004299482,0.00055239274,0.00040424865,0.00006173507,0.015884701],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830174,0.0010989851,0.00006333052,0.000170746,0.00028440537,0.00008070226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995596,0.0032705439,0.00026531122,0.00020542802,0.0005057596,0.00015705504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035974856,0.00044003144,0.0004716343,0.003010687,0.0011604594,0.004174393,0.0013604629,0.0015059521,0.006707214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048858253,0.00020198629,0.0005725692,0.0029403553,0.0048578256,0.009010404,0.0019946443,0.0022341518,0.0005660453],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041901567,0.000009630668,0.00050659676,0.00047133918,0.000017436092,0.00007853193,0.0010885,0.0020402742,0.00011920715,0.9640323,0.004024166,0.027607845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002534006,0.000025390556,0.0017470191,0.0012756622,0.000020670113,0.00018029781,0.0027176468,0.004454518,0.000127852,0.7303871,0.2590457,0.000015542326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034789995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034727314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006707214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004023441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020363445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029192269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1882866507","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-263x.2012.00238.x","title":"Environmental governance and its implications for conservation practice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":401,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University; University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; World Bank Group","keywords":"Coproduction; Corporate governance; Environmental governance; Flexibility (engineering); Accountability; Legitimacy; Conservation psychology; Environmental resource management; Business; Key (lock); Network governance; Environmental planning; Public relations; Political science; Knowledge management; Ecology; Economics; Politics; Management; Computer science; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.01951559424101633,"score_gpt":0.22263030480655124,"score_spread":0.20311471056553493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1882866507","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037155215,0.049263332,0.022740258,0.5294911,0.0016937508,0.00008625312,0.0000989848,0.000054626915,0.35941654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9623228,0.019214313,0.0038374534,0.008663192,0.0008042017,0.00007977417,0.000040078558,0.00001345224,0.00502472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909072,0.0064730556,0.00027460433,0.00073853415,0.001060024,0.00054647645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9807357,0.014368217,0.0013116992,0.0012155124,0.0015714254,0.0007975016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009067111,0.00025311075,0.00039125155,0.0015832229,0.0026636412,0.009761809,0.00083417766,0.0032954814,0.004890007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0120110735,0.00019219011,0.0002667481,0.0023527616,0.03542474,0.0073504415,0.0052296403,0.003034465,0.00026374075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031211282,0.000012449664,0.00065291725,0.00008716264,0.000004486921,0.00009129672,0.001978208,0.0005978219,0.00005529573,0.97887987,0.0035508082,0.014086515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033818937,0.000009734956,0.0010699515,0.00050889235,0.0000026366765,0.00007290627,0.0053779734,0.00037726836,0.00005772968,0.9227273,0.06978217,0.000010028959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032717802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002635598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009761809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067480253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055025406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048960567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1925363144","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-263x.2011.00168.x","title":"Underestimating the damage: interpreting cetacean carcass recoveries in the context of the <i>Deepwater Horizon</i> /BP incident","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":207,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Bycatch; Marine mammal; Context (archaeology); Deepwater horizon; Fishery; Range (aeronautics); Oil spill; Abundance (ecology); Marine ecosystem; Ecosystem; Geography; Biology; Ecology; Fishing; Environmental protection","score_opus":0.03165468463597118,"score_gpt":0.22424073108442846,"score_spread":0.19258604644845728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1925363144","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92105955,0.006856878,0.027727757,0.0052352413,0.00025460773,0.00014771077,0.005831056,0.0002005855,0.032686565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866109,0.0018803541,0.007828234,0.0004514858,0.0001546869,0.0000613454,0.0012169837,0.000032873617,0.0017632424],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809617,0.00093385635,0.00019398979,0.0003309515,0.00033910625,0.00010602469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98983115,0.0037964007,0.004157561,0.0005534408,0.0014812002,0.00018024966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005502921,0.00043229447,0.00024586314,0.002942586,0.00044103552,0.0015079366,0.0006304426,0.00044189463,0.0021688794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016016645,0.00020080112,0.00026331763,0.0021451171,0.00051947916,0.0009962787,0.0011235585,0.00048029443,0.00031752],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050775714,0.00001526181,0.95247626,0.00020156728,0.0001539681,0.0001015756,0.0006561895,0.0022782763,0.000556509,0.00041266845,0.0029721737,0.040124893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002226809,0.000056490746,0.9830136,0.00025413092,0.000068272304,0.00014224558,0.0025618859,0.004154306,0.00082288805,0.0007642261,0.008145544,0.000014186008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055217605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07198789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055217605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00090690487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004745283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10979241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1954640172","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-263x.2012.00257.x","title":"A major shift to the retention approach for forestry can help resolve some global forest sustainability issues","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":413,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service; Université du Québec à Montréal; Natural Resources Canada; Vancouver Island University","funders":"Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet; Skogforsk; Stiftelsen för Miljöstrategisk Forskning","keywords":"Forest management; Logging; Sustainability; Temperate rainforest; Biodiversity; Agroforestry; Wood production; Ecoforestry; Sustainable forest management; Temperate forest; Forest ecology; Ecosystem services; Business; Estate; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Forest restoration; Ecosystem; Forestry; Geography; Ecology","score_opus":0.019024240812525524,"score_gpt":0.2587653300292608,"score_spread":0.23974108921673526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1954640172","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035566464,0.006383835,0.046250783,0.6961541,0.0038122109,0.00010866104,0.00008194707,0.00023391015,0.21140797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6521041,0.006455198,0.051640194,0.17718983,0.0061170557,0.00022176374,0.00008791284,0.00019569529,0.10598829],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777395,0.0008082098,0.00010206933,0.00028634022,0.0005969641,0.00043247652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970481,0.00091104227,0.00023229283,0.0005053766,0.0008048056,0.00049847167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056565576,0.00029081557,0.0003035661,0.00047721408,0.0022857264,0.0044334307,0.0011083648,0.0035263295,0.010553635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003607999,0.000116584684,0.00043526504,0.00056435296,0.0060651917,0.004431764,0.0030771818,0.0056782826,0.001469748],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005636774,0.00017233122,0.004078399,0.00029237135,0.000037494796,0.00027343357,0.0023334052,0.0015783763,0.0028492662,0.74339473,0.08873815,0.15619572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024318622,0.00014427413,0.0050148508,0.0005661237,0.000030797608,0.00047530595,0.003333991,0.0019375468,0.0013447802,0.2509663,0.73609155,0.000070242015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044831824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013629276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010553635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021424193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044930554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03530538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974471722","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-263x.2009.00084.x","title":"Coral reef quality and recreation fees in marine protected areas","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Ocean Foundation","keywords":"Marine protected area; Recreation; Business; Coral reef; Scuba diving; Fishery; Willingness to pay; Great barrier reef; Quality (philosophy); Environmental resource management; Marine biodiversity; Reef; Biodiversity; Environmental science; Ecology; Oceanography; Economics; Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.13379515866301375,"score_gpt":0.24377378413905326,"score_spread":0.10997862547603951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974471722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948814,0.00028536885,0.00019453857,0.0003590649,0.0000049510495,0.0000075087364,0.00022641112,0.0000035616106,0.004037254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99963486,0.000037696307,0.000027270538,0.000009498516,0.0000044313847,0.0000015644426,0.000055574677,7.412002e-7,0.00022846584],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887043,0.00047707043,0.00009833711,0.00009504057,0.00026337942,0.00019567079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9734558,0.008039785,0.013131729,0.00063672505,0.0014965216,0.0032394552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011362593,0.00014301242,0.00024240428,0.0012850759,0.00034108767,0.0016416189,0.0002520514,0.00048191956,0.0056158756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015128511,0.000100343874,0.00033348348,0.0021723134,0.00078143645,0.00090174226,0.0008973013,0.00074070506,0.0002724355],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007755591,0.00009978616,0.9930098,0.000016721504,0.00004134489,0.00009690024,0.00013121797,0.0012431967,0.00006500947,0.0009873329,0.00024686454,0.0039843856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024628766,0.000027052181,0.99773127,0.000006429386,0.000005634936,0.00004154326,0.00030019306,0.0011022822,0.000015624548,0.00052924425,0.00023507795,0.0000032542605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015905533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021081904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015905533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014286063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037409348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031625926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030322090","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-263x.2008.00040.x","title":"Community conserved areas: policy issues in historic and contemporary context","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":185,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences","keywords":"Indigenous; Context (archaeology); Environmental resource management; Geography; Biodiversity; Corporate governance; Documentation; Biodiversity conservation; Environmental planning; Political science; Ecology; Environmental protection; Business; Biology; Economics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04166179813113901,"score_gpt":0.21928255994185175,"score_spread":0.17762076181071274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030322090","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09649846,0.024915656,0.0021791516,0.6983925,0.00072360586,0.000060188304,0.00012425115,0.000032244512,0.17707396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94727576,0.008525412,0.0016757491,0.035145745,0.00065580953,0.00007809529,0.000039524828,0.000014824965,0.0065889517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962054,0.0018220706,0.00012136396,0.00035583312,0.0004860766,0.0010093213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899003,0.0067206277,0.0010205056,0.00026288605,0.0009627819,0.0011329335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074332156,0.00021308921,0.0003017569,0.0015671067,0.008792629,0.0123855155,0.0022000836,0.010246252,0.009672194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011782828,0.00028938756,0.00018609565,0.002544391,0.01992999,0.010963774,0.0047675394,0.006682151,0.00026576643],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020282361,0.00007779103,0.003580301,0.00044928,0.000008993491,0.0009091074,0.015915256,0.0011024222,0.0003686781,0.9203533,0.025664164,0.031550456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021879418,0.000059873186,0.0103862835,0.0026350485,0.000026976384,0.0010056113,0.106273584,0.0014508407,0.00035978138,0.30570513,0.57200426,0.00007072927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0478428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06314057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0478428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013091544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010867848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.095128655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041811992","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-263x.2009.00054.x","title":"Transboundary management of large carnivores in Europe: from incident to opportunity","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Context (archaeology); Carnivore; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Environmental protection; Fishery; Environmental planning; Archaeology; Biology; Environmental science","score_opus":0.013667490796230055,"score_gpt":0.23246251837429463,"score_spread":0.21879502757806457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041811992","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8982955,0.0049898964,0.0056725144,0.028175775,0.0007643976,0.00006351385,0.000111733374,0.000049740942,0.061876956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99159825,0.0020447313,0.0011510656,0.0013602927,0.00012419446,0.000018882542,0.00004816384,0.000007083682,0.003647303],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984017,0.00074217154,0.00010563248,0.00013292427,0.000259563,0.00035788486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99754757,0.00078457117,0.00072258234,0.00017940122,0.0003610165,0.0004049228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023779313,0.00020949921,0.00016353797,0.00073771493,0.0027639975,0.0034190316,0.0005064421,0.0019750907,0.0021753926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027199634,0.00013618819,0.00019899424,0.0008190434,0.0021474764,0.0016645447,0.0038001013,0.0013571151,0.00016402741],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056451955,0.00080572255,0.3500609,0.0009369919,0.00030041972,0.038957138,0.07869673,0.010825964,0.0058912127,0.1175386,0.08898551,0.3064363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040110182,0.00080353976,0.17428108,0.0012035959,0.00012371724,0.011264545,0.37976053,0.005525187,0.0054525794,0.029872734,0.39150822,0.00016412436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059701735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007807932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059701735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012498469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011880249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012575805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075129459","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-263x.2009.00071.x","title":"Spatial socioeconomic data as a cost in systematic marine conservation planning","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":180,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"David Suzuki Foundation; Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation; David and Lucile Packard Foundation","keywords":"Socioeconomic status; Marine conservation; Environmental resource management; Business; Opportunity cost; Stakeholder; Marine spatial planning; Environmental planning; Marine protected area; Geography; Ecology; Environmental science; Economics; Population","score_opus":0.03038828360293219,"score_gpt":0.25501162739568617,"score_spread":0.22462334379275398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075129459","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42960975,0.0038443308,0.45254982,0.010664765,0.00036444512,0.0015269818,0.005779534,0.00049445295,0.095165916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9046669,0.00075505854,0.09219928,0.00010695259,0.00003478384,0.0003323546,0.0006161112,0.0000619632,0.0012266461],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9798886,0.013607978,0.0015429179,0.00044996184,0.004205887,0.00030455086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87543416,0.10040742,0.009052593,0.00507409,0.009280315,0.00075140834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01644061,0.00069390435,0.0006133915,0.005040971,0.0007966088,0.003969733,0.0010200163,0.00055379036,0.0063307933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07815969,0.00063226436,0.0007761269,0.00821796,0.0017351683,0.0045091417,0.002756984,0.0011190883,0.00028741694],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045489584,0.00021772088,0.11088589,0.0016480171,0.00065199175,0.0003935801,0.001070234,0.36700523,0.0005502776,0.17182878,0.00886698,0.33642635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015028485,0.00071891677,0.10565569,0.0024808247,0.0006872242,0.0006706552,0.006629854,0.5723122,0.0037250791,0.24353364,0.06302854,0.0004071432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013381293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022891931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01644061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004380506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036319052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08694732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097634738","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-263x.2011.00206.x","title":"Extinction risk and bottlenecks in the conservation of charismatic marine species","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":124,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Threatened species; Conservation-dependent species; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Biodiversity; Conservation status; Invertebrate; Biodiversity conservation; Marine biodiversity; Ecology; Geography; Marine protected area; Conservation biology; Fishery; Near-threatened species; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.025066926804858634,"score_gpt":0.18481652990629557,"score_spread":0.15974960310143693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097634738","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99809915,0.0003300668,0.00029966238,0.00012565182,0.00000266146,0.00000488654,0.00010077332,0.000008872616,0.0010284012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99958044,0.00008770331,0.00015566425,0.000009108884,0.0000033008946,0.000003480752,0.00006794841,0.0000013016074,0.00009091028],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994267,0.00019203807,0.000055317832,0.00011390756,0.00009850265,0.000113511414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99150336,0.0023778449,0.003808899,0.00029237548,0.00097415934,0.0010434423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002649951,0.00012762536,0.00027505532,0.0019711347,0.0004950589,0.00080554956,0.00039302968,0.00028125185,0.0023450458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008581923,0.0001240394,0.00024220187,0.00092298404,0.00055767753,0.0012382222,0.00084229105,0.00037597943,0.0001296186],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032122972,0.00004381247,0.9704459,0.000080854275,0.00012736465,0.00014982028,0.0005743157,0.0027146004,0.0012609379,0.0010208611,0.0003857901,0.022874635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008273835,0.00014692853,0.9940054,0.000027366992,0.000037028385,0.00024198837,0.0006859028,0.002903055,0.00022343521,0.0010551012,0.0006544718,0.00001119247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036375746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040131323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036375746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065645605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003362545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014014423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100584622","doi":"10.1111/conl.12098","title":"Eye on the Taiga: Removing Global Policy Impediments to Safeguard the Boreal Forest","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Future Forests Research; Umeå Universitet; Skogforsk; Stiftelsen för Miljöstrategisk Forskning","keywords":"Climate change; Sustainable forest management; Greenhouse gas; Incentive; Taiga; Climate change mitigation; Forest management; Environmental resource management; Boreal; Business; Global warming; Natural resource economics; Sustainable development; Environmental science; Environmental protection; Environmental planning; Agroforestry; Ecology; Geography; Economics; Forestry","score_opus":0.009803608483442958,"score_gpt":0.2418761893967009,"score_spread":0.23207258091325794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100584622","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02981776,0.008082768,0.005244157,0.82890826,0.006414775,0.0000840317,0.00011560267,0.00027222378,0.12106034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6422292,0.006494309,0.01001463,0.28743172,0.003250229,0.00016408155,0.00010913354,0.0002579748,0.050048646],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997433,0.0008216024,0.00007497734,0.00022317402,0.00065278664,0.0007943746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99309033,0.0027883914,0.000673848,0.0005389948,0.0010991719,0.0018092382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062782564,0.00043326456,0.00029094063,0.00076827424,0.004637552,0.0056549083,0.0012315789,0.0075859376,0.011540132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01201757,0.00018055059,0.00041388566,0.00051724876,0.004450965,0.0051462227,0.005365265,0.0075722984,0.0010726005],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023161586,0.0004153198,0.007029685,0.00078228867,0.00008769247,0.0016424517,0.008477891,0.002988685,0.008402963,0.33567724,0.47982183,0.15444243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000071003335,0.00016106362,0.008931595,0.0008939178,0.000059242848,0.00033122674,0.0076172925,0.0012953891,0.0023796163,0.103528626,0.8746414,0.000089551766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02722414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05048351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02722414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002637321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012198723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05413139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114044277","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-263x.2012.00309.x","title":"Payments for ecosystem services and the fatal attraction of win‐win solutions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":554,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Natural Environment Research Council; Sight Research UK","keywords":"Payment; Ecosystem services; Corporate governance; Face (sociological concept); Business; Public economics; Policy development; Environmental resource management; Economics; Environmental planning; Ecosystem; Ecology; Finance; Sociology; Economic policy; Geography","score_opus":0.1079685930779388,"score_gpt":0.21388098029655445,"score_spread":0.10591238721861565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114044277","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009664274,0.009770117,0.010010597,0.877077,0.006192108,0.000022945818,0.000046106834,0.000035433524,0.087181434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7650834,0.0108201355,0.005346343,0.1848572,0.011780179,0.00019660461,0.00003946793,0.00013327366,0.021743478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9754249,0.015740365,0.00085465837,0.0015184793,0.00490065,0.0015610658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9576049,0.03348839,0.0021297017,0.0014574439,0.0044750264,0.0008446107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020573864,0.00047699668,0.0006600498,0.000697539,0.0033936421,0.010034912,0.0018149128,0.012166439,0.0051964354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07335949,0.00025455048,0.0005891897,0.0007648224,0.015584752,0.01138347,0.004266994,0.014845688,0.0006699242],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001709479,0.000005284438,0.00008436672,0.000046695062,0.000005895065,0.000046883277,0.00037601314,0.0002363942,0.00003289948,0.9635021,0.030159272,0.0054870686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024969993,0.000019799703,0.00038752815,0.00054158445,0.000010194434,0.00009059248,0.0011710598,0.0012323121,0.00016869405,0.7382002,0.2581221,0.000030992764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019704462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021471698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020573864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004112731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048763477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10880631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114055676","doi":"10.1111/conl.12203","title":"A Clear Purpose is the Start Point for Conservation Leadership","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vision; CLARITY; Work (physics); Flexibility (engineering); Wildlife; Environmental resource management; Conservation science; Conservation psychology; Wildlife conservation; Business; Environmental planning; Public relations; Computer science; Political science; Sociology; Geography; Ecology; Ecosystem; Engineering; Management; Economics; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.12025796139005329,"score_gpt":0.27109108757255684,"score_spread":0.15083312618250355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114055676","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019903528,0.005102694,0.08805395,0.40889502,0.010575055,0.00041741235,0.00022119618,0.00092098035,0.46591017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77290523,0.003541021,0.050162204,0.08852255,0.0028245202,0.00064124836,0.00045025942,0.0011631551,0.07978978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98186964,0.008939507,0.000567426,0.0014189737,0.0043067844,0.0028976216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9729056,0.0047135935,0.0023365635,0.0025128126,0.0067204456,0.010811035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013669612,0.0009745864,0.00086983305,0.001775171,0.013543477,0.020081654,0.0017132212,0.0060746223,0.015662827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020621454,0.00075677707,0.00075324875,0.0009180536,0.021731358,0.020546388,0.013552266,0.014934102,0.009236049],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048456393,0.00022247892,0.0035825178,0.00045845166,0.000034122804,0.00049499725,0.051391404,0.00027696716,0.0010835578,0.65370095,0.20878713,0.07991899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024214754,0.00008790447,0.002462062,0.0010848653,0.000012544073,0.00037737848,0.030231621,0.00032976663,0.00038430374,0.26560223,0.6993228,0.000080303544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025190506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052712755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020081654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060300655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013907623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.072292686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114286845","doi":"10.1111/conl.12194","title":"Toward a Social Science Research Agenda for Large Marine Protected Areas","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Colorado State University; Waitt Foundation; Oak Foundation","keywords":"Conceptualization; Warrant; Corporate governance; Marine protected area; Politics; Environmental governance; Social research; Political science; Marine research; Sociology; Environmental resource management; Social science; Ecology; Business","score_opus":0.1582727984601587,"score_gpt":0.33715464742246676,"score_spread":0.17888184896230805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114286845","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008281859,0.013348333,0.009011027,0.9423437,0.0018175159,0.00022685879,0.000075499214,0.000040190782,0.02485498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7558868,0.04382809,0.05339099,0.12670557,0.006347903,0.0025459274,0.00034753213,0.000090466834,0.01085673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.92664564,0.060499676,0.0020243146,0.0028564148,0.004449381,0.0035245635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7101449,0.22765878,0.010853672,0.0074295243,0.028469225,0.015443865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14935842,0.0011610582,0.0018912202,0.010522044,0.017471945,0.034165382,0.0043643727,0.017577369,0.008889359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09403623,0.0008245646,0.0016790064,0.009469942,0.05486354,0.03796892,0.024117362,0.017738849,0.000879807],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003509597,0.0002502501,0.002865022,0.0017941012,0.000053404226,0.0003105065,0.04338151,0.0010182286,0.00033000016,0.88009584,0.030606156,0.039259862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035923535,0.00009951675,0.0027822438,0.006849576,0.000045680867,0.00013110692,0.15827566,0.0009778463,0.0002454949,0.61116457,0.21933296,0.00005938915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010632944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013505066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14935842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02878482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.090850204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78989226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119397961","doi":"10.1111/conl.12000","title":"Fish and hydropower on the U.S. Atlantic coast: failed fisheries policies from half‐way technologies","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":188,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Fish migration; Fishery; Hydropower; Hatchery; Dam removal; Restoration ecology; Habitat; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Geography; Environmental science; Ecology; Biology; Sediment","score_opus":0.013376511477497268,"score_gpt":0.19616272606891422,"score_spread":0.18278621459141695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119397961","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8789506,0.001175406,0.0011020461,0.04538821,0.00013581058,0.000029389674,0.0005409105,0.000037270554,0.0726404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9819686,0.0007448784,0.0010426913,0.0066949488,0.00004393729,0.000026479778,0.00018749981,0.0000114483555,0.009279587],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992849,0.00016694143,0.000040558603,0.00005607393,0.00030542377,0.00014620167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99776447,0.0004792133,0.0004125063,0.00021641528,0.00058082334,0.0005466262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017032454,0.00013620884,0.000119521166,0.00041924365,0.0011120972,0.0018495446,0.00050195237,0.0011155577,0.004451574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025596982,0.00010674638,0.00023262716,0.0003401213,0.0011333337,0.0013718219,0.001074513,0.0009965266,0.00023208503],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020968416,0.00023172809,0.612038,0.00020380398,0.00010898982,0.00071782526,0.0023045866,0.0096312985,0.004203427,0.10324014,0.06983616,0.19727436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007206695,0.0010795356,0.6972803,0.0010962567,0.00011345065,0.0004933433,0.012312553,0.008143476,0.004581634,0.017896349,0.25683632,0.00009477042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0707159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18766844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0707159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028175295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044555417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14060861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121423652","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-263x.2012.00253.x","title":"From archives to conservation: why historical data are needed to set baselines for marine animals and ecosystems","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Ichthyology and Marine Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":316,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Simon Fraser University","funders":"Schmidt Ocean Institute; Smithsonian Institution; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Environmental resource management; Baseline (sea); Ecosystem; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Marine ecosystem; Population; Conservation status; Fisheries management; Marine species; Marine conservation; Geography; Marine protected area; Fishery; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology; Habitat; Fishing","score_opus":0.054931632760091484,"score_gpt":0.26371709579961744,"score_spread":0.20878546303952594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121423652","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13676417,0.20046055,0.14307554,0.41235372,0.016270671,0.000764349,0.013504758,0.0013759766,0.075430356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7324014,0.07213326,0.14652006,0.0286171,0.004743874,0.001131876,0.007161988,0.0008990267,0.0063914717],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94879407,0.029186718,0.0073355823,0.0031356995,0.010507591,0.0010403885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.739074,0.13555753,0.02310675,0.027879532,0.06858423,0.0057980344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07200686,0.00073195033,0.0015386987,0.007969554,0.003153711,0.010455653,0.0034086688,0.002847446,0.00630076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19240698,0.0010937075,0.00074029714,0.010280041,0.006185103,0.024175698,0.0054130936,0.0052351677,0.0016654411],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049036223,0.0001922979,0.07909352,0.0069804275,0.00048498635,0.00044190552,0.008700383,0.0055187927,0.001142759,0.09988174,0.14551817,0.6515547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015420509,0.0005641419,0.09396176,0.024304004,0.00039038953,0.0011254874,0.026372094,0.0065812995,0.0040417747,0.20500311,0.636963,0.0005386947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025647242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023594026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07200686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074922587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007892507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38081324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123716684","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-263x.2012.00244.x","title":"Migration links ocean‐scale competition and local ocean conditions with exposure to farmed salmon to shape wild salmon dynamics","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Vancouver Coastal Health","funders":"Mitacs","keywords":"Competition (biology); Fishery; Productivity; Aquaculture; Population; Ecology; Biology; Geography; Fish <Actinopterygii>","score_opus":0.006766960340851432,"score_gpt":0.1997005975016922,"score_spread":0.19293363716084078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123716684","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99957806,0.000019988696,0.00007359446,0.000036713827,9.584569e-7,0.000001286239,0.000035918456,0.0000016264036,0.0002518545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99975115,0.000011612836,0.000046678622,0.000013350125,9.4762896e-7,8.844632e-7,0.00003315188,0.0000010385388,0.00014115525],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999871,0.000037392954,0.000005924499,0.00003183186,0.000012763839,0.00004103798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993943,0.00014993627,0.0001698944,0.00004601465,0.00008021509,0.0001596919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003885518,0.00013647835,0.00013978755,0.0002908394,0.00030762897,0.00073796744,0.00020073488,0.00021447343,0.002424003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011338871,0.00012300478,0.00018411694,0.00030533233,0.00066420645,0.00028385656,0.00048819,0.00024387165,0.000116027055],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004918191,0.000034183955,0.99384516,0.000007715527,0.0000539006,0.000044458517,0.00011536964,0.000752414,0.0025744082,0.000105054474,0.000117228694,0.0023009216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015450428,0.000028151306,0.99837047,0.0000024895983,0.000010348783,0.000016182794,0.00034248573,0.0009672168,0.000096179574,0.00008402768,0.00007842488,0.0000025140926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.073420435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16026923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.073420435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063979847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007566653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14598614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124734293","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-263x.2012.00226.x","title":"Catch shares, fisheries, and ecological stewardship: a comparative analysis of resource responses to a rights‐based policy instrument","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Stewardship (theology); Fishery; Resource (disambiguation); Population; Business; Fisheries management; Biomass (ecology); Variance (accounting); Natural resource economics; Marine protected area; Environmental resource management; Marine conservation; Resource use; Natural resource; Fishing; Economics; Ecology; Habitat; Biology; Accounting","score_opus":0.03732821392533917,"score_gpt":0.2666305434590246,"score_spread":0.22930232953368543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124734293","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987299,0.000015467645,0.0001924507,0.00007793544,0.0000014705934,0.0000058985065,0.000028022341,0.0000012343891,0.0009477116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997297,0.000008856871,0.000060979793,0.000012860669,0.0000026432745,0.000007462851,0.000023224542,9.857189e-7,0.00015330157],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984041,0.0008315126,0.000075910095,0.00016276416,0.00025643615,0.00026920988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9853166,0.009161546,0.0033389854,0.0007088377,0.00074839167,0.0007255861],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039181868,0.00015632124,0.00024608662,0.0005659075,0.00028971746,0.0008629403,0.0003286701,0.000505759,0.0030917136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015383017,0.00013067943,0.00039886445,0.0005096977,0.0010838922,0.0013959683,0.0010863008,0.000507049,0.00015710964],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024203886,0.0008929083,0.93826395,0.000078333964,0.00045375084,0.0002309737,0.0010960306,0.016639872,0.009112483,0.0066515803,0.00037853306,0.02378125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002052892,0.00076138036,0.98793554,0.000008981012,0.00004663099,0.00003520597,0.00096447987,0.007124343,0.0011070688,0.0014721465,0.0005072165,0.000016618153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021696452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002281125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039181868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000889871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035884537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020721614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129202648","doi":"10.1111/conl.12062","title":"Timber Harvesting Does Not Increase Fire Risk and Severity in Wet Eucalypt Forests of Southern Australia","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Logging; Flammable liquid; Fire regime; Flammability; Environmental science; Argument (complex analysis); Forest management; Illegal logging; Agroforestry; Silviculture; Geography; Forestry; Ecosystem; Ecology; Engineering; Biology","score_opus":0.01040495780350347,"score_gpt":0.20880954833772122,"score_spread":0.19840459053421775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129202648","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996691,0.000022072265,0.000020724498,0.0000112256685,4.325593e-7,7.712644e-7,0.000013918586,5.440877e-7,0.00026117507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998061,0.000011242733,0.0000173191,0.0000057914535,6.3326166e-7,6.6597426e-7,0.000015714004,3.3546422e-7,0.00014226962],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998448,0.00003809944,0.00001054502,0.000033392498,0.000034842116,0.0000384291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922085,0.000117247764,0.00031899524,0.00004466652,0.00010547052,0.0001928342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028049218,0.00009429145,0.00013580045,0.00033808564,0.0003439786,0.00039616693,0.00018832459,0.00012394032,0.0014064742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010516645,0.00011381711,0.0001380682,0.0003367089,0.00027537072,0.0002491893,0.00038486675,0.00017744355,0.00011177858],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009044941,0.000032158012,0.9927685,0.000015085097,0.00004948421,0.00013967311,0.000666387,0.00018485656,0.0020073338,0.00007008799,0.00007840841,0.0038974725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.7781696e-7,0.000010299242,0.99955684,0.0000020259165,0.0000032635776,0.000027179796,0.00017874184,0.00011002801,0.000032267362,0.000020157342,0.00005781427,7.1458595e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06202715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2153328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06202715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047084843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035596592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12333226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137481132","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-263x.2009.00082.x","title":"Over‐harvesting driven by consumer demand leads to population decline: big‐leaf mahogany in South America","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Swietenia macrophylla; CITES; Logging; Agroforestry; Geography; Range (aeronautics); Boom; Population; Agricultural economics; Forestry; Ecology; Economics; Environmental science","score_opus":0.012764305940839755,"score_gpt":0.21423740116189316,"score_spread":0.20147309522105342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137481132","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989766,0.000041243828,0.00006720858,0.00012950791,0.0000010118291,0.0000029794444,0.00007256716,0.0000017844175,0.0007071084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996382,0.000046878726,0.000054219276,0.000037144582,0.0000016033906,0.000003178173,0.000070421105,0.0000012702009,0.00014719449],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99994564,0.000013020986,0.0000030424264,0.0000151942695,0.000009783586,0.00001332588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950397,0.00015065755,0.00016678942,0.000032546202,0.000087460896,0.000058532514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022760886,0.000075967684,0.00012437091,0.0003857325,0.0004121739,0.00040884383,0.0002383028,0.00020683187,0.0029804986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007142128,0.00006641684,0.00012880714,0.00057722785,0.0004308098,0.00039823056,0.0004559057,0.00026152647,0.00010051942],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052675525,0.00002891483,0.9876437,0.00004276841,0.00002733711,0.00035031,0.0014873409,0.00019479716,0.0025398044,0.00031900592,0.00061841,0.0066947835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004290086,0.000013232909,0.99571735,0.000009315337,0.000012576227,0.00009280025,0.002329141,0.00064779824,0.00022724172,0.00025661755,0.00068622007,0.0000033813385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03986862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.115089655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03986862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054259907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003072872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.079273105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137864274","doi":"10.1111/conl.12126","title":"Maximizing Return on Investment for Island Restoration and Species Conservation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental resource management; Investment (military); Return on investment; Population; Resource (disambiguation); Business; Scale (ratio); Psychological intervention; Environmental planning; Natural resource economics; Cost–benefit analysis; Biodiversity; Ecology; Geography; Economics; Computer science; Biology; Production (economics); Political science","score_opus":0.029848578595587514,"score_gpt":0.23278351485157964,"score_spread":0.20293493625599213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137864274","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56985575,0.0027452863,0.3173108,0.00611801,0.0001231622,0.0008535986,0.0010684748,0.00045348442,0.101471476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9707656,0.00030140107,0.02679586,0.00012181968,0.000011549467,0.000112460286,0.00008455433,0.000024717727,0.0017819359],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99732107,0.0014510442,0.00006753663,0.00023275921,0.00036969827,0.0005579233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968534,0.0016921497,0.00060402637,0.0001848778,0.0003586189,0.0003069651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033010652,0.00066083786,0.0007813825,0.0013796056,0.0004003005,0.00231559,0.00083925005,0.0011149256,0.0052912906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009882132,0.0002826354,0.0004868066,0.001043389,0.00096554105,0.0014619562,0.001428879,0.00090782606,0.00040466295],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005141201,0.0003398857,0.039401192,0.0006076635,0.00041905194,0.0002702472,0.00029545557,0.70550704,0.0057757245,0.08970485,0.0070933523,0.15007137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012117157,0.00097101904,0.080622464,0.0006235412,0.00054057717,0.00052025134,0.0022672906,0.73414004,0.005659023,0.1517591,0.022661164,0.00011442321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008819292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01858321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008819292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036154569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042039724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026232064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138490642","doi":"10.1111/conl.12157","title":"The Challenges of Red Wolf Conservation and the Fate of an Endangered Species Recovery Program","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Canis; Endangered species; Population; Geography; Gray wolf; Ecology; Population decline; Demography; Fishery; Biology","score_opus":0.016771369160149954,"score_gpt":0.21264886811166406,"score_spread":0.1958774989515141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138490642","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28600222,0.058121756,0.0041559716,0.55125463,0.0017164504,0.00021119838,0.00047597106,0.00023772444,0.09782418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8880092,0.03387018,0.008380591,0.0490268,0.0005834059,0.00019182294,0.00033301086,0.00004574044,0.01955931],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977265,0.00101882,0.00010337843,0.00016389985,0.0005813532,0.0004060826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98133105,0.0056467517,0.0023814465,0.0005486395,0.0072431364,0.0028489465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007183493,0.00025882834,0.0002304531,0.0010076992,0.0026244947,0.005326278,0.0017389405,0.0019275995,0.0036424652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011283455,0.00012676991,0.0002280683,0.000706337,0.0017102803,0.0023178349,0.0017570138,0.0014783435,0.0003375267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016244299,0.00034955455,0.04001423,0.0020112668,0.0001753139,0.0024191462,0.0055565936,0.0029786497,0.0031310737,0.049937125,0.1656346,0.72763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049342445,0.0007491205,0.14898984,0.011208334,0.0004131633,0.002176906,0.054383405,0.0036263852,0.0043110326,0.03452409,0.7393672,0.00020111653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04305207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09044205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04305207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032095953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018414782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.085603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141329490","doi":"10.1111/conl.12156","title":"From Management to Stewardship: Viewing Forests As Complex Adaptive Systems in an Uncertain World","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":248,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; Université TÉLUQ; Okanagan College; Université du Québec en Outaouais; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Adaptability; Ecoforestry; Adaptive management; Environmental resource management; Incentive; Stewardship (theology); Forest ecology; Pace; Business; Adaptive capacity; Forest management; Ecosystem management; Climate change; Ecosystem; Forest restoration; Ecology; Agroforestry; Politics; Geography; Political science; Economics; Environmental science","score_opus":0.04265102930437285,"score_gpt":0.2722124128549434,"score_spread":0.22956138355057054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141329490","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.106808946,0.012825228,0.11588615,0.60556537,0.0015606491,0.00010502879,0.000115870644,0.00012235157,0.15701039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97947985,0.0020963799,0.0076508503,0.0070578516,0.0005766662,0.0000602936,0.00001294588,0.000024519799,0.0030407913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964977,0.002427487,0.00006076868,0.00034116095,0.00033956993,0.00033329992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99452597,0.0029607965,0.00064070994,0.00040040212,0.00055037154,0.0009218048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064898618,0.00050647755,0.00048541094,0.0011878127,0.004144852,0.017826926,0.0018143203,0.0059511084,0.003235845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005619898,0.00035088471,0.0005016187,0.0009811022,0.032486547,0.013320459,0.00474196,0.0054210094,0.00031253358],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002696794,0.000043986038,0.0017103328,0.00007291016,0.000020881482,0.00028296074,0.0059465566,0.0054421593,0.00026610665,0.9727473,0.005199312,0.008240621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006051856,0.00002038841,0.00087778777,0.000080974714,0.000008629991,0.00006842172,0.0042462125,0.0053710137,0.00012287602,0.968239,0.02093902,0.000019531104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062397453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007539081,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017826926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006667532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037335183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04837662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144457452","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-263x.2012.00307.x","title":"Rethinking biodiversity: from goods and services to “living with”","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Environmental Conservation and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":257,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Biodiversity; Convention on Biological Diversity; Commodification; Ecosystem services; Diversity (politics); Goods and services; Environmental resource management; Currency; Business; Ecosystem; Economics; Ecology; Political science; Biology; Law; Economy","score_opus":0.014008011050520137,"score_gpt":0.18858376371009836,"score_spread":0.17457575265957823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144457452","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08554943,0.019692007,0.071573496,0.33310664,0.0030288878,0.000042029304,0.00019027735,0.000101591635,0.4867156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9725088,0.003905768,0.008174881,0.007197244,0.0008477413,0.000049243976,0.000043736727,0.000059651684,0.0072129965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955936,0.0027895134,0.00011199694,0.0003817899,0.0008117304,0.00031138846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964791,0.0019842444,0.0002991038,0.00040577375,0.0005217239,0.0003100172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049519595,0.0006024859,0.00051620096,0.003206632,0.005108429,0.015440462,0.0016360343,0.0040894677,0.004606781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056988997,0.00025212351,0.00039288434,0.0031314045,0.070587456,0.020905113,0.008451055,0.005968213,0.00038717187],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040940085,0.000003319574,0.00012131657,0.0000144970345,0.0000017347362,0.000028539265,0.0022309278,0.00014698961,0.000048481088,0.9932546,0.001176241,0.002969208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020827822,0.0000060857683,0.00024129977,0.000110531255,0.000003294439,0.000040803967,0.002856149,0.00037085282,0.000074533426,0.9595654,0.03672188,0.000007034271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006757966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007560779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015440462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006902034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030437054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050078034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144503057","doi":"10.1111/conl.12182","title":"Another Continental Vulture Crisis: Africa's Vultures Collapsing toward Extinction","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":400,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Royal Society; Peregrine Fund; African Bird Club","keywords":"Vulture; Critically endangered; Endangered species; Geography; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Ecosystem; Ecology; Threatened species; Legislation; Environmental protection; Biology; Habitat; Political science","score_opus":0.06330954486663097,"score_gpt":0.2573157673115405,"score_spread":0.1940062224449095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144503057","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91826403,0.00960575,0.0017533448,0.030073402,0.0003645587,0.00006236501,0.0006041596,0.0000734027,0.039199065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98580694,0.0048892726,0.0010804292,0.0051411283,0.00013370313,0.000018950372,0.00023796457,0.000016437727,0.0026750434],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997696,0.000056153694,0.000011146114,0.000034202876,0.00003855822,0.000090148664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989743,0.00015986322,0.00025117127,0.00007539603,0.00020692969,0.00033236732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081940286,0.0003700818,0.00025740176,0.0008815755,0.0026018808,0.002042512,0.0004602765,0.0012043873,0.0060222996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023517222,0.000116196126,0.00020679145,0.000872953,0.001663933,0.0032569822,0.0020561325,0.0015595759,0.00030153577],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043462747,0.00016244543,0.49554363,0.00084993977,0.00023074792,0.00801129,0.026808506,0.0014799482,0.01067594,0.026373144,0.06405197,0.36537778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003342163,0.00045755488,0.62049013,0.0009977891,0.00012870849,0.007236368,0.06705451,0.001098927,0.0021681595,0.0150457295,0.2851985,0.000090143534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012395891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020126374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012395891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010539488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011281241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024647474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147375258","doi":"10.1111/conl.12066","title":"Climate‐Smart Landscapes: Opportunities and Challenges for Integrating Adaptation and Mitigation in Tropical Agriculture","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":397,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"International Fund for Agricultural Development; European Commission; Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, nukleare Sicherheit und Verbraucherschutz; United States Agency for International Development","keywords":"Food security; Environmental resource management; Agriculture; Adaptation (eye); Context (archaeology); Climate change; Business; Scope (computer science); Natural resource economics; Environmental planning; Climate change mitigation; Adaptive capacity; Scale (ratio); Poverty; Geography; Economics; Ecology; Economic growth; Computer science","score_opus":0.05854676426735942,"score_gpt":0.20624252742469362,"score_spread":0.1476957631573342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147375258","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34992036,0.024722576,0.09411423,0.20494944,0.0007397855,0.00032141036,0.00022515302,0.00033058808,0.32467645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9739861,0.0049453108,0.01630929,0.0024042614,0.00014085045,0.00008863338,0.000035389083,0.000024317807,0.0020658795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986298,0.0007473932,0.00003554308,0.00008723178,0.00016878953,0.00033123806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801576,0.000695005,0.00021233552,0.00030691276,0.00028845726,0.0004813964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004005293,0.00035341518,0.00031308585,0.0005895458,0.0022213662,0.0052409545,0.0008572282,0.0013593601,0.003864171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021570155,0.00020549362,0.0003658011,0.000763663,0.0066024857,0.0049284184,0.007275957,0.0015749683,0.0002680948],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001959766,0.00043183015,0.032750797,0.0015855245,0.00019942703,0.0017551595,0.011315413,0.025112461,0.012956003,0.54683733,0.02100418,0.34585595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033386645,0.0002743163,0.04357448,0.00088281994,0.000079682206,0.00077374105,0.041202545,0.013499859,0.0034722053,0.6180945,0.27802384,0.0000885979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004974751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011240198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052409545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002647466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044122427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021182299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148152210","doi":"10.1111/conl.12167","title":"The IUCN Red List of Ecosystems: Motivations, Challenges, and Applications","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":219,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Australian Research Council; MAVA Foundation; Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, Australian Research Council; Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation","keywords":"IUCN Red List; Threatened species; Environmental resource management; Ecosystem; Conservation-dependent species; Biodiversity; Convention on Biological Diversity; Ecosystem management; Near-threatened species; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.02718854086827762,"score_gpt":0.22683545411760686,"score_spread":0.19964691324932923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148152210","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02083772,0.047307696,0.08861818,0.35715,0.020456184,0.0013194666,0.0050309743,0.0012908129,0.457989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22548033,0.024836179,0.4764128,0.18384035,0.005575569,0.004769269,0.006493164,0.0007431079,0.071849145],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9616187,0.017816512,0.0031211367,0.0015958631,0.0142237535,0.0016240125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9060002,0.0317774,0.007425361,0.0069093993,0.043578643,0.0043090587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04510444,0.0013776644,0.0008870343,0.0072444486,0.0043597547,0.009307682,0.0053177816,0.006726821,0.004379654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07426636,0.00062290067,0.0008447124,0.006866541,0.0066694524,0.0056144805,0.0068590334,0.007045424,0.0017004595],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008566636,0.00010729803,0.008308614,0.0016675537,0.000039321367,0.0004657351,0.0015924873,0.0033371227,0.0006261222,0.27349657,0.53595155,0.17432189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000146397815,0.00013630812,0.008340129,0.006584649,0.000037294507,0.00082996394,0.0015694313,0.0035281286,0.00071938446,0.06692518,0.9111674,0.00014746185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025400788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029927379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04510444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005675465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015289947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23853797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155413255","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-263x.2012.00234.x","title":"Do pathogen spillover, pesticide use, or habitat loss explain recent North American bumblebee declines?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Ottawa","funders":"Division of Biological Infrastructure; University of Connecticut; American Museum of Natural History","keywords":"Bumblebee; Biology; Spillover effect; Ecology; Pollinator; Habitat; Population decline; Pollination; Population; Geography; Demography","score_opus":0.09499889205395932,"score_gpt":0.244955651664653,"score_spread":0.14995675961069366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155413255","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99799937,0.0005232998,0.00018378452,0.00045247175,0.0000057655384,0.00000630572,0.00018647265,0.0000062174804,0.0006363989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994654,0.00012421547,0.000071550596,0.00007086904,0.000012638153,0.000003900873,0.0001690015,0.0000016194261,0.00008074618],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997131,0.00008738964,0.000020013222,0.00008255403,0.000033463522,0.000063436506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99716187,0.0010869303,0.0010815497,0.00018536567,0.00022425869,0.00025991155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018807556,0.00021862779,0.00035406553,0.0010124722,0.0005361765,0.00071566744,0.00050427683,0.0005476479,0.003908631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048584454,0.00017765313,0.00036657366,0.00064161146,0.00050436985,0.0009153988,0.00040874936,0.0005313255,0.00024451566],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006200841,0.000028705079,0.9954609,0.000015453346,0.000055351124,0.000034859015,0.00011082219,0.00012368403,0.00022805126,0.00005175634,0.00023596454,0.00359235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038367302,0.000017085873,0.99836785,0.000008084661,0.000027239841,0.000031316948,0.00026306242,0.0009916098,0.000022569599,0.00009142422,0.00017427822,0.0000017241707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027632091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043373507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9723679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000493233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027414763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05494249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155731629","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-263x.2009.00089.x","title":"Combined effects of two stressors on Kenyan coral reefs are additive or antagonistic, not synergistic","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":146,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; Sight Research UK; Wildlife Conservation Society","keywords":"Coral reef; Coral bleaching; Coral; Reef; Fishing; Ecology; Stressor; Ecosystem; Resilience of coral reefs; Fishery; Marine ecosystem; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.012801204228422805,"score_gpt":0.23251391565255194,"score_spread":0.21971271142412913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155731629","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99600863,0.0011065019,0.00022304032,0.00015925887,0.000011535772,0.000028839746,0.00040368782,0.000009054729,0.0020494158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982559,0.00043467936,0.00041892758,0.00010381623,0.0000084095345,0.00002952499,0.00024009314,0.0000024096985,0.0005062657],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990421,0.00027276066,0.000081267324,0.00017593059,0.00023980081,0.00018810338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981863,0.00039663524,0.0006314738,0.00016115322,0.00030595134,0.0003184508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006451301,0.00072862685,0.00079151726,0.0008314284,0.0009125063,0.0010579908,0.00039114174,0.000388023,0.00316777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010234154,0.00037179617,0.00050468603,0.0005570955,0.000732907,0.00047421985,0.0019218397,0.00044128805,0.0002580197],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002629722,0.00045169436,0.7431,0.0010437809,0.0015016479,0.0011140223,0.00043567887,0.001739578,0.21783657,0.00048831326,0.0009625368,0.028696511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012294152,0.00043185192,0.99472886,0.000036371835,0.0001534194,0.00018568247,0.0006133166,0.0004344585,0.002496936,0.00016648168,0.0007231683,0.000017124485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077730226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021690998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077730226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008818553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080120587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015455544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165324342","doi":"10.1111/conl.12198","title":"Great Barrier Reef No‐Take Areas Include a Range of Disturbance Regimes","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority","keywords":"Reef; Coral reef; Marine protected area; Disturbance (geology); Great barrier reef; Range (aeronautics); Coral; Environmental science; Geography; Habitat; Marine reserve; Fishery; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.022426487349540388,"score_gpt":0.21348461157171097,"score_spread":0.19105812422217058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165324342","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99741,0.00008210747,0.0001271703,0.00007106527,0.0000020782709,0.000010990939,0.00015319607,0.0000049318114,0.0021385858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994486,0.000042888612,0.000105238716,0.000018114204,0.000002880623,0.0000066637162,0.00012795239,0.0000013012522,0.00024635188],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995735,0.000103122846,0.000049124465,0.00007767732,0.0001307431,0.0000659059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978828,0.00030464234,0.0011363602,0.00020750705,0.00020149593,0.0002671002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031344098,0.00017964748,0.0001866316,0.0007149741,0.0004648354,0.0006556935,0.00031333163,0.00018048484,0.0018685324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016215537,0.000114936,0.00017511261,0.00068906264,0.00048487866,0.00035874007,0.0010701122,0.00026962152,0.00016184847],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008786107,0.00004361397,0.98618364,0.000061134626,0.00010050627,0.00013849298,0.0011877154,0.000176963,0.002254193,0.00010406273,0.00023231775,0.009429543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.4543606e-7,0.000030408608,0.9989465,0.0000060985067,0.000007896187,0.000072017916,0.00048001442,0.000055381068,0.00008883118,0.000020211268,0.00029023,0.0000015016266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021003077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.066889234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021003077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030567107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002267963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041761637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171067728","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-263x.2009.00064.x","title":"Protecting ecosystem services and biodiversity in the world's watersheds","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Charles Sturt University","keywords":"Ecosystem services; Biodiversity; Environmental resource management; Business; Prioritization; Environmental planning; Service (business); Biodiversity conservation; Ecosystem; Environmental protection; Geography; Ecology; Environmental science","score_opus":0.010128042377908585,"score_gpt":0.1819363595887336,"score_spread":0.171808317210825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171067728","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9146133,0.0019444824,0.009706706,0.008121777,0.000057427045,0.00006601088,0.00032444237,0.00004958265,0.0651163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949575,0.00047836077,0.0035896006,0.00013905556,0.000012305565,0.000009699456,0.00005334274,0.0000039199513,0.00075626303],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996675,0.00012882339,0.00001565502,0.000024077006,0.000081584396,0.00008229636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914265,0.00021616803,0.0002321202,0.000054445973,0.00016934826,0.00018517202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009799112,0.00022212282,0.00019608765,0.0014096133,0.0018029038,0.0033422397,0.00028234615,0.00032573412,0.0024072635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020675145,0.00007776655,0.00014239927,0.0022307085,0.001680749,0.0018059363,0.0017912869,0.00045279317,0.00010210007],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001388132,0.00017746689,0.48390794,0.00046865808,0.00010396994,0.0008315775,0.0037635816,0.016620977,0.006696787,0.22893912,0.011135617,0.24721551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041866853,0.00022675178,0.52901006,0.00045338878,0.000100402714,0.0014025806,0.024301741,0.019879274,0.008545971,0.31552604,0.100421086,0.00009081397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012205039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03780457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012205039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020462156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025438475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024267972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2191609435","doi":"10.1111/conl.12217","title":"Managing Marine Biodiversity: The Rising Diversity and Prevalence of Marine Conservation Translocations","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"World Bank Group","keywords":"IUCN Red List; Threatened species; Biodiversity; Marine ecosystem; Marine conservation; Marine protected area; Marine reserve; Ecosystem; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Biology; Environmental planning; Geography; Environmental science; Habitat","score_opus":0.03280232173616392,"score_gpt":0.20294844929761807,"score_spread":0.17014612756145414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2191609435","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24265008,0.54512244,0.0053931614,0.14885075,0.0012603732,0.00008641748,0.00055848854,0.000094105904,0.055984132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65391785,0.31908143,0.008431889,0.014950607,0.0009210841,0.000054814314,0.00029396103,0.00004093908,0.0023074201],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947417,0.0019810947,0.0004696557,0.00076085347,0.001754735,0.00029182757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9599516,0.022511687,0.0087306015,0.0014940887,0.005870632,0.0014413745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009700957,0.00023034589,0.00051528064,0.002575989,0.0011108636,0.0042029503,0.0010574744,0.0017949229,0.0029489738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021920573,0.00018217006,0.0002979718,0.0061765653,0.0031067939,0.0068555204,0.002153986,0.0017938354,0.00021254864],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009789887,0.000056824076,0.075498894,0.012741204,0.00015585494,0.0015922998,0.013387834,0.00076615857,0.0024854073,0.016822934,0.019741105,0.8566536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002030762,0.0005430736,0.3316661,0.01919404,0.0002045668,0.0049333237,0.07385445,0.0010397506,0.0016472439,0.02202654,0.5447185,0.00015211207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008481693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021756751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009700957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002433383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003214398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05130416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2292123233","doi":"10.1111/conl.12241","title":"Private Landowners, Voluntary Conservation Programs, and Implementation of Conservation Friendly Land Management Practices","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Indiana University","keywords":"Stewardship (theology); Business; Land tenure; Environmental resource management; Environmental stewardship; Ecosystem services; Environmental planning; Turnover; Private property; Land use; Land management; Ecosystem; Geography; Ecology; Economics; Political science; Agriculture","score_opus":0.014802854084051433,"score_gpt":0.26206904673767795,"score_spread":0.2472661926536265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2292123233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973916,0.000049569546,0.00004854106,0.00041801995,0.000004759372,0.000008596686,0.000034654262,0.0000016750538,0.0020425657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995235,0.000029470631,0.00006121581,0.000025820093,0.000005300776,0.0000050875565,0.000025976258,5.3549576e-7,0.00032313785],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986552,0.0006337014,0.00008591589,0.00011680472,0.00025235524,0.00025597328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9796641,0.004673165,0.0101919845,0.0006111311,0.0009230691,0.0039366293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018765293,0.0000824058,0.00010154952,0.00044577132,0.000581023,0.0010958011,0.00032735296,0.00038762778,0.0052176598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008640709,0.000094946125,0.000108912485,0.00042161328,0.0006996578,0.0007285175,0.00070802146,0.00068933883,0.00013396883],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038476246,0.0003698526,0.99077386,0.000013528838,0.000016258062,0.000037277452,0.0009995057,0.00007829805,0.00009668169,0.00033783767,0.0003656298,0.006872687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025158108,0.000052441774,0.9954332,0.000021099348,0.0000038179155,0.000033658285,0.0033793263,0.00022130144,0.000038131544,0.00011342947,0.00069823256,0.0000028049362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00866909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021710332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00866909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006353153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009925262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017454863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2295687299","doi":"10.1111/conl.12245","title":"Integrating Expert Perceptions into Food Web Conservation and Management","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Northwest Fisheries Science Center; Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation","keywords":"Perception; Context (archaeology); Sustainability; Herring; Food web; Environmental resource management; Function (biology); Resource (disambiguation); Diversity (politics); Geography; Knowledge management; Computer science; Ecology; Fishery; Psychology; Sociology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Environmental science; Biology; Ecosystem","score_opus":0.011854376410209836,"score_gpt":0.21323598733576662,"score_spread":0.2013816109255568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2295687299","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.954723,0.00027985554,0.016178548,0.0019313502,0.00003392896,0.000074277625,0.00010160761,0.000021849957,0.026655653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99728537,0.00006210049,0.0023398115,0.00010985957,0.000007928663,0.000010500908,0.000018278348,0.0000024996898,0.0001635478],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938105,0.0036955092,0.00020834326,0.0004513547,0.0014645624,0.00036975168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9761379,0.014151586,0.003980196,0.0012875713,0.0032188562,0.0012239389],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009798448,0.00027644794,0.00022124693,0.0018993682,0.0012536036,0.0033185948,0.0008142522,0.0007795766,0.002772215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04010844,0.00020558063,0.00021895404,0.00085314526,0.00267678,0.0024565158,0.0028264364,0.0007499427,0.0001229751],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003875812,0.0005762103,0.7439872,0.000523947,0.00027704757,0.0006333658,0.049470693,0.01767416,0.0035358786,0.018527726,0.0034656269,0.16094051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004140489,0.00047647947,0.71454453,0.0009490034,0.00018773279,0.00035437968,0.10312576,0.07840558,0.003047743,0.08632125,0.012355236,0.00019083211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02024247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034455128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02024247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025662624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017468244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0518198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2396228150","doi":"10.1111/conl.12266","title":"Timing of Protection of Critical Habitat Matters","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Threatened species; Habitat; Critical habitat; Environmental resource management; Process (computing); Endangered species; Ecology; Business; Environmental planning; Geography; Environmental science; Biology; Computer science","score_opus":0.02190352957377423,"score_gpt":0.22947335495869228,"score_spread":0.20756982538491806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2396228150","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69085217,0.003060289,0.16731934,0.0067152358,0.0007271459,0.0002954777,0.0008869324,0.00030660833,0.12983686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883376,0.00036329354,0.006515029,0.0001514918,0.000032332417,0.000029522585,0.000078612786,0.000026668204,0.0044656093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991703,0.00020149711,0.000043053187,0.00023877494,0.00015240145,0.00019407377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952142,0.002408526,0.00087046466,0.00026627467,0.0004928516,0.00074768084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002123628,0.00031416048,0.0004580703,0.00049391424,0.0008015113,0.0028650805,0.0010574472,0.0012262412,0.014065611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011126834,0.0003272643,0.00035545486,0.0003762148,0.0012099365,0.0026664496,0.0010819709,0.0015392298,0.0012483109],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015815165,0.0005238272,0.23642059,0.0012434906,0.00035075613,0.0023944348,0.0029425307,0.1724384,0.031347457,0.3041771,0.01679605,0.22978376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024538973,0.0027970118,0.29549104,0.0012207878,0.00047499393,0.0030058594,0.012324716,0.21759658,0.016684633,0.32622424,0.12359311,0.00034167612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007300901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010802019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014065611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017298847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023034788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04705417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2406723167","doi":"10.1111/conl.12261","title":"A Tool for Selecting Plants When Restoring Habitat for Pollinators","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":101,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Army Research Office; Natural Resources Conservation Service; U.S. Department of Agriculture; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Pollinator; Habitat; Forb; Pollination; Ecology; Species richness; Biology; Geography; Agroforestry; Grassland; Pollen","score_opus":0.07245867354186393,"score_gpt":0.22714189460873582,"score_spread":0.15468322106687188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2406723167","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17315689,0.0023053624,0.6655782,0.0011949157,0.0003482268,0.00138515,0.04485769,0.1058479,0.0053256857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1748234,0.0001571181,0.79775846,0.0003587715,0.00008475216,0.00080655835,0.023411905,0.0013235904,0.0012754872],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970943,0.000762498,0.0003974955,0.0009865147,0.0006150354,0.00014418227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886497,0.007993808,0.0010323967,0.0009628833,0.0009821175,0.0003791016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063894163,0.0019907893,0.0011720066,0.009715888,0.00070298463,0.0018542539,0.0024453728,0.0023893656,0.004322627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017556358,0.00058518985,0.0015895708,0.0031440794,0.0005570477,0.0021092861,0.0020130342,0.0013329147,0.0025060375],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00086815626,0.00090436183,0.16358717,0.0024123054,0.0012295755,0.0007721045,0.0012953447,0.028948398,0.02147417,0.0030271043,0.10475695,0.67072433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004087751,0.00044221722,0.041640647,0.00042741158,0.00033441166,0.0011464938,0.00089029525,0.8448571,0.018901207,0.011793894,0.078974165,0.00018347068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024215933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008303463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009715888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059236574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080520695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033790827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2410042934","doi":"10.1111/conl.12268","title":"Balancing Ecosystem and Threatened Species Representation in Protected Areas and Implications for Nations Achieving Global Conservation Goals","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Australian Research Council; University of Queensland; Australian Government; Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, Australian Research Council","keywords":"Threatened species; Convention on Biological Diversity; Ecosystem; Representativeness heuristic; Biodiversity; Habitat; Environmental resource management; Ecosystem services; Ecology; Business; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.022068809741874973,"score_gpt":0.22934440367675948,"score_spread":0.2072755939348845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2410042934","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9253138,0.00021886731,0.0321251,0.0011596379,0.000015009147,0.00008276741,0.000114916984,0.000050436593,0.040919464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99540627,0.000034548393,0.0040839696,0.000035205816,0.0000023635785,0.000027186792,0.000018586801,0.000006322683,0.00038547968],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977977,0.0012139645,0.0000695115,0.00017707572,0.00034938997,0.0003924459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99551433,0.0020905493,0.00074568635,0.0004055464,0.0007485328,0.00049542915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004590221,0.00024946834,0.00032545815,0.0010494301,0.0007930906,0.0022094923,0.0006738626,0.00045677784,0.003112464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015339666,0.00021930045,0.00020858913,0.0009686674,0.0011296726,0.0024097462,0.0026677866,0.0004867173,0.00016790311],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054152677,0.00026630372,0.18198633,0.000256688,0.0001963152,0.0004589371,0.0017772699,0.49707016,0.0139137525,0.13073632,0.003800998,0.1689954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009182503,0.001109292,0.3272704,0.0003685201,0.00020172176,0.0011279096,0.009741712,0.4292215,0.011236372,0.19947077,0.020023903,0.00013607794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00419469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0100290775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004590221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015129333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011282606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02427572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2419681323","doi":"10.1111/conl.12275","title":"Conservation (In)Action: Renewing the Relevance of UNESCO Biosphere Reserves","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Ecology, Conservation, and Geographical Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mandate; Convention on Biological Diversity; Biosphere; Environmental resource management; Sustainability; Environmental planning; Political science; Biodiversity; Biodiversity conservation; Work (physics); Indigenous; Relevance (law); Diversity (politics); Business; Geography; Ecology; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.02646260501907563,"score_gpt":0.24045778008702556,"score_spread":0.21399517506794993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2419681323","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09605631,0.007556964,0.0036299087,0.5267573,0.0019185457,0.000109609035,0.00034270747,0.00009261582,0.3635361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.912771,0.0040570763,0.006099513,0.02707767,0.00036525948,0.00006642012,0.00015018636,0.00007176024,0.04934122],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969849,0.00089798775,0.000077348144,0.00017650274,0.001077907,0.0007853657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98588574,0.0046537197,0.0008090184,0.0011989533,0.004444673,0.003007954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00786141,0.0001661121,0.00021318025,0.0011014438,0.009552539,0.010890631,0.0014236816,0.0016249176,0.0064804293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014303954,0.00014164616,0.000109240966,0.0016669973,0.0110585205,0.0032866877,0.0045451256,0.0026857902,0.00021378114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044622215,0.00007097069,0.022612609,0.00035915928,0.000014489048,0.00061495707,0.1301989,0.0004522688,0.0014071461,0.28501424,0.32547525,0.23373541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028449938,0.000008209949,0.010523011,0.0004313827,0.000007659377,0.000078180805,0.046579942,0.0001551197,0.00030055633,0.011148491,0.93074995,0.000014608777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8123691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8975483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8123691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027334554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0770318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37747175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2422320287","doi":"10.1111/conl.12273","title":"Erratum to “Vessel Strikes to Large Whales Before and After the 2008 Ship Strike Rule”","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nova Scotia Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Bay; Cape; Fishery; Race (biology); Geography; Channel (broadcasting); Point (geometry); Oceanography; Archaeology; Engineering; Geology; Telecommunications; Mathematics; Geometry; Biology","score_opus":0.013555457481344402,"score_gpt":0.22900702486393618,"score_spread":0.21545156738259177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2422320287","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009153027,0.0011945433,0.0008951509,0.05476712,0.8803713,0.000069756614,0.008503958,0.00069291866,0.052589998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0154316,0.005181139,0.0036508122,0.061751243,0.09661091,0.00027572378,0.018413786,0.0015306722,0.7971542],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785113,0.00025941196,0.0004484002,0.00029623348,0.0009805416,0.0001642704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99157023,0.0020345626,0.0009859062,0.000493572,0.0044805333,0.00043507214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015936033,0.0011529607,0.0007069592,0.0022796297,0.002379965,0.0024671848,0.0013057075,0.003042444,0.08888758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015107283,0.00069307943,0.000682313,0.0016387578,0.0010180029,0.0016993127,0.0013367122,0.0042178826,0.059409674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015730531,0.000004146421,0.00009107497,0.000028384437,0.0000013904237,0.00003300361,0.000023413108,0.000014235616,0.00002269891,0.0002773941,0.99628556,0.0032029955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011577685,0.000016007461,0.0018992265,0.00018905477,0.000005701685,0.000066384666,0.00013099938,0.000052066775,0.00012763645,0.00034018746,0.99714714,0.0000140453185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03173025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04060627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08888758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002443403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032383834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29735857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2464487016","doi":"10.1111/conl.12280","title":"Socioeconomic Benefits of Large Carnivore Recolonization Through Reduced Wildlife‐Vehicle Collisions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Carnivore; Wildlife; Geography; Ecosystem services; Socioeconomic status; Herbivore; Trophic cascade; Population; Ecosystem; Ecology; Biology; Demography; Predation","score_opus":0.013477764058496116,"score_gpt":0.22508519805914504,"score_spread":0.2116074340006489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2464487016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950754,0.0000635079,0.0006241585,0.00016893,0.000004264289,0.000008791592,0.000059182148,0.000009637303,0.003986016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994979,0.000024140327,0.00020429282,0.00001670099,0.0000021968585,0.000002232014,0.000022519098,0.0000012502899,0.00022880781],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99980766,0.00008912916,0.0000045910815,0.000020106025,0.00001934149,0.000059175934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993544,0.00014296504,0.00019604135,0.000061183986,0.000077427125,0.00016792725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051445863,0.00035273476,0.00016070326,0.00036398266,0.0003195876,0.00072774687,0.0003985036,0.0002858336,0.004981012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014397338,0.00010999376,0.00028683167,0.0002358143,0.0003631541,0.00041288254,0.00069106126,0.00030310283,0.00015673526],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011145744,0.002726137,0.6921016,0.00026386956,0.00077731133,0.0008926387,0.000779262,0.16392606,0.018918363,0.02116712,0.0038302739,0.09350283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011427419,0.0023544217,0.8216495,0.00009312078,0.00029639312,0.00050355407,0.0033204856,0.14629503,0.0029594698,0.014723329,0.007634513,0.00005605262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0105372565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028879784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0105372565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009259966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052839855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020951867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510435450","doi":"10.1111/conl.12290","title":"“As Far as Possible and as Appropriate”: Implementing the Aichi Biodiversity Targets","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Convention on Biological Diversity; Equity (law); Biodiversity; Context (archaeology); Relevance (law); Diversity (politics); Political science; Convention; Environmental planning; Conference of the parties; Environmental resource management; Business; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Economics","score_opus":0.009855720677347204,"score_gpt":0.1957866371140723,"score_spread":0.1859309164367251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510435450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8172611,0.0016785371,0.010256963,0.056023236,0.00038776526,0.0013369656,0.0007020832,0.00017728435,0.11217609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98315984,0.000572612,0.009732948,0.0035630802,0.000029370976,0.00064889836,0.00012642331,0.000016676859,0.0021500606],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95558864,0.024461092,0.0027206647,0.0015609888,0.011361527,0.004307072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8834092,0.06209098,0.009795113,0.0054947403,0.0332782,0.0059317313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04549914,0.00028698103,0.00037029252,0.0017260851,0.0059181596,0.005228202,0.001447648,0.0024235593,0.001615622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09318977,0.0002580957,0.00017678087,0.002905562,0.0061991652,0.002996777,0.0029041837,0.002815289,0.00028568757],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030305015,0.0004638753,0.13629204,0.0029023273,0.00007518923,0.00087775534,0.43639418,0.0024642176,0.006868514,0.08332154,0.056595404,0.27344188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006510918,0.00036803694,0.2146387,0.0030896896,0.0001270419,0.00025207226,0.5170681,0.0025678654,0.008906457,0.015399458,0.23722464,0.00029294076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27964953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40600237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27964953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029768577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07558346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55604357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2515253084","doi":"10.1111/conl.12295","title":"Persistent Disparities between Recent Rates of Habitat Conversion and Protection and Implications for Future Global Conservation Targets","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":204,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Biome; Habitat; Biodiversity; Geography; Habitat conservation; Biodiversity conservation; Ecology; Environmental protection; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Ecosystem; Biology","score_opus":0.024769664514506996,"score_gpt":0.22268174906782512,"score_spread":0.19791208455331813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2515253084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910964,0.0006940766,0.0002112859,0.0022612964,0.000015764399,0.0000062309905,0.0006276819,0.000009618973,0.0050777043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993007,0.00015673418,0.00007103911,0.000087318615,0.000007393745,0.000003330525,0.00022278013,0.000001686068,0.0001489864],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996927,0.000054498396,0.000022061633,0.00007338794,0.000042963606,0.00011444121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99756986,0.000336474,0.0013422916,0.00014747426,0.00022924232,0.0003747008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008563791,0.000064481486,0.00011171369,0.0006561636,0.0002918769,0.00077988434,0.00025368916,0.00019035196,0.004115185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023148244,0.00006679788,0.000108215776,0.0013457156,0.0006763638,0.0011609027,0.0010202219,0.0006977604,0.00016676914],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004230583,0.000027364575,0.9694705,0.00004748233,0.00002985676,0.000078659235,0.0008613122,0.0003647848,0.00033244613,0.0018797464,0.002131076,0.024734406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.7557686e-7,0.000008021626,0.99787796,0.000016009664,0.0000021368605,0.000045884844,0.0007217802,0.00007870019,0.000029427078,0.00024479677,0.0009715796,0.0000027024041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011350263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022191864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011350263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053740497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003964735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022568405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2524534322","doi":"10.1111/conl.12302","title":"Smart Protected Area Placement Decelerates Biodiversity Loss: A Representation‐extinction Feedback Leads Rare Species to Extinction","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Australian Research Council","keywords":"Extinction (optical mineralogy); Threatened species; Biodiversity; Extinction debt; Ecology; Extinction event; Representation (politics); Feedback loop; Environmental science; Geography; Environmental resource management; Biology; Computer science; Habitat destruction; Habitat; Biological dispersal; Political science; Computer security; Paleontology","score_opus":0.027904969395838513,"score_gpt":0.20450297604957277,"score_spread":0.17659800665373426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2524534322","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9892498,0.000091210284,0.006383785,0.00033355033,0.000020314264,0.000023819552,0.000035147732,0.00009449078,0.0037678771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99923074,0.000019868348,0.0005125708,0.000038268838,0.0000031233474,0.000003855102,0.0000064669325,0.0000028326126,0.00018240229],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995604,0.00017237235,0.000017873745,0.00007150664,0.00006789886,0.00010992625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978915,0.0007808593,0.0007235018,0.00015052385,0.00017791608,0.00027571953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010700143,0.00030384466,0.0002682912,0.00043808485,0.0003767334,0.0007757151,0.0005401485,0.0005590199,0.0045434064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004744549,0.000186831,0.00030687876,0.00018632042,0.00068007,0.00095078297,0.0009949271,0.0005337305,0.0002654643],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022591362,0.0028727327,0.39735767,0.0006126511,0.0004622353,0.001127577,0.00096777594,0.26463985,0.086675815,0.026438905,0.0046384647,0.21194725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036193847,0.003673177,0.40380228,0.0001193559,0.0004820906,0.000896803,0.0015281619,0.53335404,0.015459016,0.034932796,0.005292036,0.000098329685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017899428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030212526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0045434064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007211596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044494707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015199184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529336724","doi":"10.1111/conl.12312","title":"Looking Beyond the Fenceline: Assessing Protection Gaps for the World's Rivers","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":155,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Australian Research Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Convention on Biological Diversity; Upstream (networking); Marine protected area; Biodiversity; Geography; Drainage basin; Hydrography; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Marine biodiversity; Environmental protection; Ecology; Habitat; Cartography","score_opus":0.018141673342180253,"score_gpt":0.23514965340106883,"score_spread":0.21700798005888858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529336724","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99133193,0.00023730246,0.0030501348,0.0002708149,0.0000068992563,0.000018372242,0.0007052089,0.000020399599,0.004358957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99854577,0.000030585536,0.0010507634,0.000016657192,0.0000028448276,0.000012146458,0.00026349377,0.0000040631217,0.00007363305],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987632,0.0004898716,0.00010173376,0.00025741945,0.000248279,0.00013961035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99186206,0.003227689,0.0025921413,0.0005772894,0.0012693567,0.00047139032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034556985,0.00034904372,0.000357889,0.0035465725,0.00072668836,0.0017503109,0.000684746,0.00056447805,0.0010999846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010469976,0.00012296233,0.00036698172,0.004984348,0.0011086451,0.0035638448,0.00215395,0.00063176075,0.00008929576],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006187098,0.000041930805,0.9605622,0.000067809684,0.00010504262,0.00011282699,0.002252722,0.0071964045,0.00023796005,0.002474563,0.0008069578,0.026079664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004148762,0.00009960516,0.96547645,0.0001296821,0.00004338987,0.00014177892,0.0068822727,0.01837501,0.0003803613,0.0052797487,0.0031629936,0.000024559387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014424202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020553056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014424202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009960562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011110817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028680503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2552584232","doi":"10.1111/conl.12329","title":"Sufficiency and Suitability of Global Biodiversity Indicators for Monitoring Progress to 2020 Targets","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Bundesamt für Umwelt; European Commission","keywords":"Biodiversity; Environmental resource management; Relevance (law); Environmental planning; Scale (ratio); Indicator value; Business; General partnership; Geography; Environmental science; Ecology; Political science; Biology; Cartography","score_opus":0.010660645250639075,"score_gpt":0.21741683492104394,"score_spread":0.20675618967040488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2552584232","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44596246,0.122570835,0.107677214,0.03377989,0.003933162,0.0014154353,0.030099753,0.0014722879,0.25308904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93710744,0.0118208,0.037630677,0.0011042565,0.00043419425,0.00064243964,0.009640046,0.000121166064,0.0014989584],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9746099,0.0111899255,0.003683065,0.001339721,0.007883332,0.001293995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9157201,0.033391126,0.010680566,0.0031236666,0.035478666,0.0016059136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04362367,0.001002288,0.0010773564,0.011060888,0.0005846343,0.0042446856,0.0011918996,0.00086906017,0.0019223364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06663326,0.00030144694,0.00077839824,0.011680794,0.0012355715,0.004407403,0.002448286,0.0015142015,0.00062958966],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006848962,0.00014461526,0.44462636,0.00632453,0.0010407527,0.0002808286,0.0021768406,0.015296484,0.0013477772,0.022202905,0.04424391,0.46163008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000116219024,0.0011791728,0.69942856,0.017837295,0.0017169794,0.0007485549,0.010174266,0.033785272,0.00706029,0.03549651,0.19203511,0.00042188776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076722107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0087608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04362367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033948293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035418693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23070675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2584752733","doi":"10.1111/conl.12346","title":"Mislabeling Seafood Does Not Promote Sustainability: A Comment on Stawitz <i>et al</i> . (2016)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Identification and Quantification in Food","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Resource (disambiguation); Identification (biology); Business; Natural resource economics; Fishery; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Geography; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.025140193706192936,"score_gpt":0.29897091894159,"score_spread":0.2738307252353971,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2584752733","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027883827,0.001042974,0.00012890762,0.980688,0.01679574,0.00000756967,0.00008336541,0.000035761754,0.00093884487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018964179,0.0004407082,0.0001954033,0.9875587,0.008546582,0.000018010385,0.000013349151,0.000021952012,0.0013089746],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865242,0.0035265887,0.0020674055,0.0025173065,0.004296643,0.0010677723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93852115,0.03565163,0.003779818,0.0026751736,0.01622256,0.003149784],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019340659,0.0012318868,0.0018954508,0.0012018443,0.0070641264,0.005027503,0.007327092,0.06807535,0.005488731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05877524,0.001224382,0.0021390254,0.0017573576,0.01097673,0.005546015,0.0028176606,0.070237406,0.008584942],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052954336,0.000020505455,0.0004885204,0.000105882056,0.000025711042,0.00022577339,0.0003432827,0.000048795406,0.00015942099,0.0026321039,0.9911958,0.0047013527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000741324,0.00007886778,0.0023887295,0.00084228785,0.00009065289,0.00058210915,0.0014543731,0.0003564404,0.0010410652,0.011452127,0.98147315,0.00016623239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024442814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02782881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93192464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005170374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0084348405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10228443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2584757473","doi":"10.1111/conl.12347","title":"Aeroconservation for the Fragmented Skies","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia; Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Biodiversity; Habitat fragmentation; Ecology; Ecosystem; Geography; Environmental resource management; Fragmentation (computing); Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.046308804466800566,"score_gpt":0.2725465823030252,"score_spread":0.22623777783622462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2584757473","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57604426,0.050109673,0.023199221,0.066704884,0.0015603602,0.000120222205,0.0021438387,0.00016379356,0.27995363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98056877,0.006276201,0.0028886788,0.0016912462,0.0002233172,0.000040848357,0.00041337608,0.000027253047,0.0078703],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909854,0.00030815043,0.000056547928,0.00011608106,0.00024561732,0.00017513179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997656,0.0006089522,0.0006055233,0.00019192137,0.00056336407,0.000374306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013955528,0.00017720362,0.00022123384,0.0015304185,0.0014342777,0.0030417473,0.00079760276,0.00085150107,0.00900522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037573301,0.00008999124,0.00038374093,0.0016358739,0.0031100905,0.0022168802,0.002262023,0.0010300968,0.0005825251],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042338987,0.00016832052,0.14435677,0.0021405935,0.00024307973,0.0006030239,0.0074219313,0.013075039,0.0022385695,0.37719557,0.055515252,0.39661857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037446527,0.00044308562,0.23771076,0.003583096,0.00018364277,0.0008624653,0.02271996,0.007665159,0.0017133713,0.1666243,0.5583446,0.000112180554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021977384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061254866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021977384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033303036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027268364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043698967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593715183","doi":"10.1111/conl.12360","title":"Trends in Industrial and Artisanal Catch Per Effort in West African Fisheries","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Paul G. Allen Family Foundation; University of British Columbia; MAVA Foundation; Pew Charitable Trusts","keywords":"Overexploitation; Overfishing; Fishing; Fishery; Artisanal fishing; Catch per unit effort; Fish stock; Fisheries management; Geography; Business","score_opus":0.04513198873916648,"score_gpt":0.26233679868962534,"score_spread":0.21720480995045885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593715183","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975822,0.00037002173,0.000059639166,0.000072892704,0.000002626031,0.0000033319552,0.00056043104,0.0000022192664,0.0013466824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998884,0.00033090176,0.00010997199,0.000008916931,0.0000029178427,0.0000037219402,0.00019716939,0.0000012765627,0.00046108282],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99989295,0.00002017466,0.000012227708,0.000021723163,0.000019345982,0.0000335399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926585,0.000105931314,0.0004137293,0.000021646134,0.00014005862,0.00005276588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024199345,0.000113562775,0.00006269884,0.0011768546,0.00013611275,0.0003303136,0.0001458367,0.00010223032,0.0020305763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013603541,0.000078489895,0.00008084828,0.0016377814,0.00016962783,0.00048338095,0.00028788453,0.00015052292,0.00015962507],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000493814,0.000013779222,0.98090035,0.00008889017,0.00003212883,0.00024664812,0.0008283618,0.0003253297,0.00079014536,0.00039562484,0.00051797973,0.015811395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.757136e-7,0.00000847646,0.9980786,0.000022684031,0.0000033639174,0.000080587095,0.00070046075,0.00019909978,0.00007389306,0.000027375396,0.00080296997,0.000001907439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020331237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04145029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020331237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004076518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017009852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040425777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2600017475","doi":"10.1111/conl.12363","title":"Applying a New Ensemble Approach to Estimating Stock Status of Marine Fisheries around the World","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation","keywords":"Fishery; Stock assessment; Stock (firearms); Marine protected area; Fisheries management; Marine fisheries; Fish stock; Marine reserve; Geography; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Fishing; Ecology; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.0547953684987996,"score_gpt":0.2786138285118493,"score_spread":0.2238184600130497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2600017475","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55256486,0.00080389914,0.43764114,0.0005433714,0.00015252481,0.00010218754,0.0031330655,0.00092316867,0.004135773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9248336,0.00022780437,0.07118008,0.00008587361,0.00010116936,0.00007580994,0.0026166805,0.000052531544,0.00082646834],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992613,0.0002797498,0.00006505399,0.00018363877,0.00014518658,0.0000650919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971284,0.001440188,0.00029512367,0.0003321096,0.0007186653,0.00008549737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002528398,0.0006617085,0.0008137801,0.0033901443,0.00048070648,0.0011522691,0.00068559137,0.0006525077,0.0010780744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077763335,0.0002454198,0.00079113524,0.0021164676,0.00013397943,0.0012693736,0.0010674334,0.000710166,0.00024913464],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016732904,0.00020942577,0.20197204,0.00006259362,0.0011426584,0.00015002681,0.00019582643,0.4429732,0.0019566682,0.0015191789,0.0038097734,0.34584135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039704164,0.000025155121,0.014483714,0.00001575259,0.00006006421,0.000017281822,0.00003938773,0.982961,0.00022253039,0.0016512155,0.00050266914,0.000017139077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021537505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026934754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021537505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044357264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005774166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042824328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2609138867","doi":"10.1111/conl.12367","title":"Ecosystem‐Based Fisheries Management for Social–Ecological Systems: Renewing the Focus in the United States with <i>Next Generation</i> Fishery Ecosystem Plans","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bedford Institute of Oceanography; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Fisheries management; Ecosystem; Context (archaeology); Business; Cognitive reframing; Environmental resource management; Fisheries science; Resource (disambiguation); Fisheries law; Ecosystem management; Resource management (computing); Fishery; Fishing; Ecology; Environmental science; Geography; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.07283062819035616,"score_gpt":0.25463431406811465,"score_spread":0.1818036858777585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2609138867","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020013344,0.011257889,0.0068021696,0.92008173,0.0016431833,0.00004559549,0.000048911737,0.00009710911,0.040010057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6771662,0.027427439,0.061520312,0.21642973,0.0020208822,0.00027572375,0.00019289875,0.00008819521,0.014878601],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977062,0.0010934607,0.00009476886,0.00015379526,0.0005989971,0.00035283077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915555,0.003224941,0.00065208843,0.00046144883,0.0019546074,0.0021513472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01047376,0.00031347864,0.00029913167,0.00074828183,0.0044994284,0.0071185674,0.0012891847,0.004760712,0.004564701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072403895,0.00023495294,0.00048266797,0.0006484044,0.005431163,0.0051121064,0.005732983,0.004694514,0.00030449397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004596426,0.00038015854,0.014323179,0.0006249938,0.000057990343,0.0006141276,0.005977002,0.003242102,0.0014047811,0.26264355,0.37417114,0.33651492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027319198,0.00018579763,0.017789772,0.0025079837,0.000054059474,0.00029153455,0.018317575,0.0057615526,0.001159989,0.17492731,0.7788932,0.00008392136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026406838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.081043184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026406838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062399907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019223683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055391192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612497353","doi":"10.1111/conl.12359","title":"Unsupported Conclusions on Net Conservation Benefits of Mislabeling Seafood","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Identification and Quantification in Food","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"IUCN Red List; Ranking (information retrieval); Conservation status; Vagueness; Fishery; Biology; Geography; Statistics; Ecology; Computer science; Mathematics; Information retrieval; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04282669357567789,"score_gpt":0.28876256763408636,"score_spread":0.24593587405840847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612497353","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06842195,0.19055207,0.25573558,0.33819273,0.029073585,0.0040251287,0.024715984,0.0018830537,0.08739995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69455886,0.02196462,0.10541512,0.15465951,0.005342448,0.004159711,0.0061973184,0.0010395757,0.0066628377],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.86565536,0.08331271,0.014853463,0.016013252,0.018170243,0.0019950268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.46286,0.45749027,0.023335729,0.034714743,0.019650958,0.0019482939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.18739644,0.0030822149,0.0029568383,0.005691808,0.0017006464,0.00648125,0.0072130146,0.00545708,0.013595624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.45628253,0.0014064092,0.010009113,0.005035511,0.009028301,0.012530296,0.005929436,0.009437235,0.0033138555],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008422926,0.0005430973,0.08661792,0.07458399,0.104897134,0.0015785518,0.0061146724,0.011117353,0.0053941547,0.20589381,0.14414167,0.35069472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017648216,0.0010064391,0.05144947,0.03561836,0.048037015,0.0008857817,0.0044177994,0.008152274,0.008291523,0.65622264,0.18367782,0.0004761137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00448838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039704023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18739644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025463244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003745321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99105895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626119688","doi":"10.1111/conl.12383","title":"Incorporating Land Tenure Security into Conservation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":207,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; David and Lucile Packard Foundation","keywords":"Land tenure; Context (archaeology); Psychological intervention; Work (physics); Environmental resource management; Business; Environmental planning; Security of tenure; Geography; Economics; Agriculture","score_opus":0.019216282868857574,"score_gpt":0.2213523987427957,"score_spread":0.20213611587393812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2626119688","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2715726,0.010897609,0.05948342,0.2199993,0.0014618972,0.0006964013,0.00029052966,0.00019168449,0.43540657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823152,0.0011827593,0.007834171,0.003122051,0.00015382699,0.00011074713,0.00003085566,0.000014554153,0.0052358815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919131,0.0054188175,0.00027306017,0.0003620657,0.0009640562,0.0010689086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850797,0.006422071,0.0022828607,0.0018178573,0.002216297,0.002181229],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011545142,0.00022945004,0.00024907148,0.0012857413,0.0029545017,0.004334528,0.0014467742,0.002272149,0.010473582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026924852,0.000196754,0.00028134816,0.001261536,0.009492404,0.005744342,0.0071311216,0.002515947,0.000448112],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005460407,0.0002905166,0.030731663,0.0006837898,0.00005255932,0.00032887192,0.015750416,0.0059575466,0.0011840321,0.71995914,0.0132123465,0.2117946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045363246,0.0006653111,0.050567828,0.004875802,0.00008857458,0.00039552303,0.03448248,0.0055611655,0.0014365446,0.5446873,0.3571108,0.000083356485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007040496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018124972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011545142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005004319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010948372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06105727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2731941109","doi":"10.1111/conl.12390","title":"Predicting and Assessing Progress in the Restoration of Ecosystems","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Ecosystem dynamics and resilience","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment","keywords":"Restoration ecology; Ecosystem; Environmental resource management; Resilience (materials science); Psychological resilience; Disturbance (geology); Novel ecosystem; Trophic level; Index (typography); Ecosystem management; Environmental science; Ecological succession; Ecology; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.014883132663428817,"score_gpt":0.2540321387385309,"score_spread":0.23914900607510212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2731941109","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91091967,0.00027380502,0.08030253,0.00030599008,0.000030977877,0.00010814362,0.0009311852,0.00030241307,0.0068253125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9761367,0.00011372709,0.022690546,0.000011611695,0.0000083040695,0.00003739982,0.00040623898,0.0000129013115,0.0005828102],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991511,0.00030641883,0.000070458525,0.00019337909,0.00021207247,0.00006648827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961837,0.0016178037,0.0010407978,0.00031681056,0.0005826518,0.000258259],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033579713,0.00054299383,0.0003505208,0.0033374242,0.00043873594,0.0015178568,0.00040634195,0.0006010575,0.0010949026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007996652,0.00014952755,0.0003093312,0.0015821719,0.00076081016,0.0015870889,0.0011208882,0.00058720313,0.00035333904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017775496,0.00016184374,0.48791993,0.000093459785,0.0001094535,0.00009957542,0.00035544738,0.41342363,0.002340219,0.004409601,0.0010493912,0.089859806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008825544,0.0002897702,0.14370994,0.00006816078,0.00004704491,0.000098675504,0.00060185074,0.8350972,0.0048626005,0.012994801,0.002161796,0.000059354632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008257969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008968876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008257969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010766648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008352251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017758906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2738690977","doi":"10.1111/conl.12395","title":"Wild Salmon Sustain the Effectiveness of Parasite Control on Salmon Farms: Conservation Implications from an Evolutionary Ecosystem Service","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Parasite Biology and Host Interactions","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Alberta; Vancouver Coastal Health; University of British Columbia","funders":"Connaught Fund; Canada Research Chairs; Alfred P. Sloan Foundation","keywords":"Fishery; Biology; Aquaculture; Lepeophtheirus; Domestication; Resistance (ecology); Ecosystem services; Ecosystem; Ecology; Fish <Actinopterygii>","score_opus":0.015599004316363872,"score_gpt":0.3025390182128313,"score_spread":0.28694001389646745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2738690977","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9625985,0.0002963677,0.0020879244,0.00733323,0.00003282111,0.000017269434,0.000045866902,0.000027742824,0.027560225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99855155,0.00005564797,0.00040996532,0.0002528585,0.000012120539,0.000004094341,0.000010277125,0.000003430964,0.0007000008],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996867,0.00010609637,0.000012229827,0.000053020594,0.000044683555,0.000097262615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986639,0.00015792093,0.00032478018,0.0001339128,0.00021562312,0.00050393684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009938915,0.00014727411,0.00016161405,0.00033377256,0.0014185287,0.0017342163,0.0004848544,0.0009602646,0.005828436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002012267,0.0001362638,0.00016960583,0.00024070161,0.0024299175,0.0016159044,0.0018460812,0.0006784368,0.00024113784],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004493753,0.00095143775,0.6278937,0.00038749992,0.000211999,0.0019555292,0.0068176514,0.006502059,0.053836484,0.11814376,0.0061503593,0.17670019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005840216,0.0017520348,0.8526153,0.000218395,0.0001245003,0.0014646396,0.019404242,0.012931624,0.0044719744,0.07431101,0.032552402,0.0000954312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004329719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014995347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005828436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012605584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010332892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01949805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2739144495","doi":"10.1111/conl.12377","title":"Tax Shifting and Incentives for Biodiversity Conservation on Private Lands","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Nature Conservancy of Canada; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Liber Ero Foundation; Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, Australian Research Council; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Easement; Incentive; Business; Natural resource economics; Convention on Biological Diversity; Biodiversity; Tax incentive; Revenue; Property tax; Ecosystem services; Environmental resource management; Economics; Ecosystem; Finance; Ecology; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.12832646296989544,"score_gpt":0.2251833796237535,"score_spread":0.09685691665385807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2739144495","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93453586,0.00036559565,0.015843607,0.0017738016,0.000055311826,0.00018562928,0.0002776736,0.000050823393,0.046911806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975781,0.0000574295,0.0008861525,0.000042105814,0.0000067853407,0.00001192253,0.000022223232,0.0000027249787,0.0013925417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987675,0.00062711217,0.000034408247,0.00008675338,0.00017413679,0.00031012698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99092907,0.005784962,0.0014904353,0.0004703784,0.0006504638,0.00067470485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027927787,0.00023254243,0.00036808083,0.00057631254,0.0007856555,0.0022592237,0.00059921853,0.00096039404,0.0105285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013412623,0.00023078821,0.00032162722,0.0007187613,0.0012327179,0.0018919286,0.0008097293,0.001128753,0.00022419439],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008320815,0.00094960275,0.06381355,0.00019260043,0.00012444051,0.00043592256,0.0004433527,0.38688496,0.002027466,0.4629962,0.0063118013,0.07498805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039912201,0.0007043277,0.08484447,0.00017545809,0.00016751255,0.00027110818,0.002617445,0.5267344,0.0020732114,0.35283092,0.029082071,0.000099870085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013157294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0177029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013157294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004691852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041875476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03522134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2758691103","doi":"10.1111/conl.12413","title":"Informing Aerial Total Counts with Demographic Models: Population Growth of Serengeti Elephants Not Explained Purely by Demography","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Horizon 2020; Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute; Zoologische Gesellschaft Frankfurt; European Commission; World Wildlife Fund; Paul G. Allen Family Foundation","keywords":"Tanzania; Population growth; Population; Abundance (ecology); Geography; Immigration; Demography; Population size; African elephant; Ecology; Biology; Sociology","score_opus":0.011928452063244102,"score_gpt":0.19890481214443684,"score_spread":0.18697636008119273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2758691103","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9662439,0.00014403058,0.031372935,0.00039444253,0.000020654079,0.00002474779,0.00032062613,0.000057530455,0.0014211664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99333924,0.00010434863,0.0060387608,0.000034892364,0.000021722326,0.000021239352,0.00014323779,0.000007721666,0.0002889457],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956495,0.00032880847,0.000012916672,0.000058744907,0.000013213389,0.000021364787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99411994,0.0050141057,0.00047740666,0.00018743133,0.000116430165,0.00008481192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020897207,0.00048089554,0.00030950375,0.00050459226,0.0002865564,0.00095844385,0.00042477262,0.00044430624,0.0014473282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009729055,0.00037530708,0.0004004003,0.000440099,0.00041997785,0.0008781676,0.0006123812,0.00046396576,0.00014432054],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001147958,0.00006106028,0.24096008,0.000042931948,0.00016051825,0.00018175834,0.00025369707,0.74130833,0.00044996396,0.0030753838,0.0005119531,0.012879511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012302832,0.00003375398,0.014715383,0.000016141566,0.00002368156,0.000026509952,0.00013412704,0.9825326,0.00010300917,0.0021481325,0.0002456419,0.000008633114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028813949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030001467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028813949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007184514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005963785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05729246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766701461","doi":"10.1111/conl.12418","title":"Making Tough Choices: Picking the Appropriate Conservation Decision‐Making Tool","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Bonefish and Tarpon Trust","keywords":"Prioritization; Management science; Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Conceptual framework; Resource (disambiguation); Environmental resource management; Data science; Business; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.06974355410113003,"score_gpt":0.30309518197724067,"score_spread":0.23335162787611063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766701461","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042854965,0.006958553,0.7501094,0.1302756,0.0015918645,0.008202023,0.0013090954,0.0014481179,0.057250466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11238437,0.0018530212,0.877601,0.0033755002,0.00018559949,0.003055063,0.00044125872,0.00017624856,0.0009278696],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8344195,0.12779388,0.014672999,0.0055219065,0.014514513,0.003077108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.65741265,0.27408123,0.013528626,0.012659227,0.03293428,0.009383883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.16044046,0.002659788,0.004010714,0.017014626,0.006368119,0.029075285,0.007204469,0.009150908,0.01646392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.30610946,0.002025984,0.0031368006,0.009864535,0.01199677,0.030318378,0.015216619,0.009874693,0.0042713764],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00078015594,0.0014864984,0.010398627,0.010702217,0.00084692956,0.0011353659,0.014272801,0.02022037,0.0023239155,0.285515,0.06265583,0.5896623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004123246,0.00031411153,0.00243385,0.0153328795,0.0004432387,0.00027525963,0.017065953,0.03376159,0.002216687,0.8598724,0.0673755,0.0004963233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023276694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037070063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16044046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009587644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028592402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8485004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770369428","doi":"10.1111/conl.12428","title":"Shining a light on seafood mislabeling through respectful debate","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Identification and Quantification in Food","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Internet privacy; Natural resource economics; Psychology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.04527866469998393,"score_gpt":0.30451272842167093,"score_spread":0.259234063721687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770369428","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039492347,0.009188939,0.0043653785,0.9537334,0.006977415,0.000021500897,0.000017415729,0.00004282241,0.021703772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36018625,0.007534499,0.006300842,0.6046859,0.014126896,0.0001806226,0.000043886896,0.00034011094,0.0066010244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.76415277,0.18325686,0.0050190976,0.010606387,0.026452154,0.010512657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.61538315,0.31189433,0.020039635,0.017752169,0.020576661,0.014353989],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17781083,0.0015093518,0.0023443622,0.0056055984,0.034360074,0.069932565,0.0066913106,0.058093097,0.007048664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24883918,0.0011346645,0.0020010495,0.003624011,0.1719571,0.077964336,0.03476984,0.06869071,0.002702605],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007192145,0.0000710311,0.0010718739,0.00032914558,0.00006139226,0.0005995027,0.119726405,0.00018632053,0.00034999094,0.76192904,0.09378408,0.021819295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004802344,0.000039999544,0.00030080072,0.0013996093,0.00003176648,0.00020457519,0.052290533,0.00022796194,0.0004895862,0.64062756,0.30425772,0.0000818615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044457763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049608983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17781083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020355498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02430202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9403648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771263356","doi":"10.1111/conl.12430","title":"Asymmetric cross‐border protection of peripheral transboundary species","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; University of Alberta; ARC Resources (Canada); Thompson Rivers University","funders":"Office of International Science and Engineering; Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Climate change; Geography; Range (aeronautics); Environmental resource management; Ecology; Biology; Economics","score_opus":0.039098075070320364,"score_gpt":0.29749552610859875,"score_spread":0.2583974510382784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771263356","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9777764,0.0003554346,0.0019507888,0.00020479604,0.000011916672,0.000015234591,0.00008580552,0.000018636463,0.019581012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989262,0.000049839313,0.00050841674,0.00004413847,0.000002706817,0.0000057913803,0.000043401113,0.0000033822828,0.00041604319],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999366,0.00014749709,0.000029798512,0.00015170155,0.00009103373,0.00021399122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99756,0.0003614754,0.0008710855,0.00040271037,0.00041720673,0.00038749486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081299193,0.00018178138,0.0003163648,0.00086949544,0.0019412054,0.001494086,0.00043726375,0.00048207093,0.008492893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026366862,0.000105609484,0.00013453337,0.0008332347,0.0014216745,0.001600629,0.0028986312,0.00044330338,0.0004613206],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00071232533,0.00020060908,0.69551563,0.00048262902,0.00019429463,0.0012984489,0.009710374,0.004406593,0.09238767,0.03468675,0.0045342627,0.15587032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017994456,0.0001271606,0.9402061,0.00028668332,0.000065835055,0.0013269522,0.00974562,0.0041270684,0.0055493345,0.012422644,0.026094742,0.000029884737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065233675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018604103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008492893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000882881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059699843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028411567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790514674","doi":"10.1111/conl.12434","title":"A global analysis of management capacity and ecological outcomes in terrestrial protected areas","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":203,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Golder Associates (Canada)","funders":"Horizon 2020 Framework Programme; National Research Foundation; Danmarks Grundforskningsfond; H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions; Villum Fonden; United States Agency for International Development","keywords":"Biodiversity; Abundance (ecology); Population; Environmental resource management; Global biodiversity; Ecology; Geography; Biology; Environmental science; Demography","score_opus":0.019225926048187576,"score_gpt":0.21889073449325008,"score_spread":0.1996648084450625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790514674","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99861896,0.000036104542,0.00017330775,0.000022222352,0.000001229983,0.0000026854104,0.0004283644,0.000005326081,0.000711846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99960035,0.000010435252,0.00006579965,0.0000027672295,0.0000013114895,0.0000019164565,0.00027694265,0.0000015227595,0.000039017028],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99971575,0.00009592154,0.0000223435,0.00006496662,0.00004089332,0.000060234095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99732447,0.0006336269,0.0012773094,0.00024227134,0.00026577365,0.000256586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097509264,0.00014894779,0.00015193029,0.0013911354,0.00016177456,0.0004894886,0.0001839962,0.000114838505,0.0011984229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026388615,0.00006839338,0.00022513949,0.0019406454,0.00036618803,0.00082813046,0.00078261795,0.00020272836,0.000104939696],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022674963,0.000010432019,0.994873,0.000008157026,0.00007307537,0.000021415794,0.0000943832,0.0010196837,0.00020194004,0.000121995654,0.00012129414,0.003431861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.135083e-7,0.000021462834,0.9985493,0.0000029948544,0.000010036449,0.000024273144,0.00015907268,0.0009280914,0.000049015376,0.00008476629,0.00016839888,0.0000018315282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032160303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005718498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0032160303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002602229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014471507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0063946247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790633784","doi":"10.1111/conl.12447","title":"New policy directions for global pond conservation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":188,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"National Research Foundation","keywords":"Convention on Biological Diversity; Biodiversity; Ecosystem services; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Legislation; Habitat; Geography; Business; Ecosystem; Ecology; Environmental protection; Environmental science; Political science; Biology","score_opus":0.015077129366957175,"score_gpt":0.2561752728749553,"score_spread":0.2410981435079981,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790633784","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036937788,0.019549018,0.01141014,0.8234602,0.005487462,0.00015201577,0.00036647817,0.00034662054,0.1355343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24030654,0.04552168,0.07117391,0.5227173,0.005659469,0.001186722,0.0015015393,0.00029451604,0.11163839],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962204,0.001656948,0.00015787082,0.00040085812,0.0007902557,0.00077376777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98883027,0.003886781,0.00060928974,0.0010085561,0.002720698,0.0029443621],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011816813,0.0006676141,0.0006246414,0.0015632854,0.0024093806,0.0082226675,0.0028150172,0.011671973,0.07123793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0111243045,0.00031061997,0.0009988624,0.0020631412,0.006039734,0.012211617,0.006967269,0.0071510244,0.0046508457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005704612,0.00018999583,0.0014637877,0.00068628736,0.00002325844,0.00018670181,0.0009129582,0.0011602219,0.0005264382,0.6042835,0.26344162,0.1270681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037811045,0.00004022797,0.0014380411,0.00085620605,0.000015255815,0.00010396179,0.002363664,0.00064085785,0.00016880942,0.15223782,0.84207463,0.00002274283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008051481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010841537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07123793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037793845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023274422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23831457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791599583","doi":"10.1111/conl.12439","title":"Biologically representative and well‐connected marine reserves enhance biodiversity persistence in conservation planning","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":130,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Biodiversity; Environmental resource management; Persistence (discontinuity); Conservation biology; Marine reserve; Representation (politics); Environmental planning; Biodiversity conservation; Prioritization; Population; Mediterranean climate; Geography; Ecology; Habitat; Environmental science; Biology; Business","score_opus":0.03460277137720492,"score_gpt":0.24774148981869523,"score_spread":0.21313871844149032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791599583","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9454177,0.00014293045,0.047311187,0.0004559225,0.0000070491183,0.000055836634,0.000095044015,0.0000738891,0.006440443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928772,0.000023173125,0.006928425,0.000010141165,0.000002173247,0.000010994313,0.000020422845,0.000005108648,0.00012241503],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989924,0.00067066064,0.00003474197,0.0001283414,0.00010280863,0.000071053226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99594134,0.0023748511,0.0009965744,0.00030761372,0.00018475112,0.00019488779],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019182101,0.00029594693,0.0002806385,0.0013221817,0.00045222745,0.0016583683,0.00061146007,0.00050751003,0.0024482335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008801186,0.00023643137,0.00032504296,0.0009708266,0.0009577113,0.001764541,0.0016314571,0.0004221902,0.00007201461],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027892596,0.00032148912,0.18434703,0.00034751053,0.0003767938,0.00029353896,0.00081396813,0.6470262,0.006804325,0.031123037,0.0009406657,0.12732647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008383483,0.0005593833,0.22081694,0.00014651971,0.0002864108,0.0004193013,0.0024057985,0.7039205,0.0047195586,0.062673405,0.003884449,0.00008392114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059758755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018012797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059758755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010969479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079830503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011882186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794405729","doi":"10.1111/conl.12448","title":"Present and future biodiversity risks from fossil fuel exploitation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"UK Energy Research Centre","keywords":"Biodiversity; Fossil fuel; Natural resource economics; Habitat; Environmental science; Environmental protection; Geography; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Biology; Economics","score_opus":0.02880582611734645,"score_gpt":0.2184615132727598,"score_spread":0.18965568715541337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794405729","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9868819,0.00039283736,0.00035240117,0.00041861573,0.000005657289,0.0000040447867,0.00060438726,0.0000062752906,0.0113339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99903345,0.00016355066,0.000085747764,0.0000129723985,0.0000046598493,0.0000016013405,0.00022801287,8.584431e-7,0.00046910657],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997813,0.000039427767,0.000012095442,0.00002752011,0.000077554956,0.000062072846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990625,0.00015877406,0.00048458253,0.000037568017,0.000110672205,0.00014597896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026309103,0.00010737312,0.00008951632,0.0008215338,0.00031605127,0.000912292,0.0002202266,0.00021250467,0.0055537946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011278194,0.00005762763,0.00016406245,0.00089146727,0.00043019358,0.00069129607,0.000936807,0.0002979684,0.00047701056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008621708,0.00003492869,0.95904595,0.0000483184,0.000057332374,0.00041513555,0.00036945235,0.0039313147,0.0006635382,0.005334314,0.0015156807,0.028497817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035672206,0.000046863293,0.9797023,0.000059812362,0.00002836632,0.0008783672,0.0023440043,0.00467328,0.0004073216,0.006815007,0.005026097,0.000015105305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035361703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008143663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055537946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005085849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025565177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018579245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800836881","doi":"10.1111/conl.12565","title":"The elephant (head) in the room: A critical look at trophy hunting","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Raincoast Conservation Foundation; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Trophy; Opposition (politics); Environmental ethics; Wildlife; Wildlife conservation; Political science; Sociology; Ecology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.014871283835504217,"score_gpt":0.2472819315576778,"score_spread":0.2324106477221736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800836881","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27714333,0.035522558,0.0077803587,0.501868,0.017455278,0.00034719292,0.00014206504,0.00011089927,0.15963027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87116843,0.015005464,0.002636061,0.078172654,0.0061110375,0.00023544615,0.000052995925,0.00018612698,0.026431793],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98936915,0.00867018,0.00016506735,0.00042672703,0.00054252666,0.00082629203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803576,0.015642071,0.0009656928,0.0003685385,0.0012377047,0.0014284113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0108756535,0.0010410616,0.00087848556,0.0026619087,0.0286803,0.012828307,0.0030398055,0.011485249,0.004221938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0189809,0.00064718054,0.0006558698,0.0014865347,0.039289825,0.013692717,0.0076825093,0.01907679,0.00078432244],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021634014,0.000035093042,0.000575234,0.0001994387,0.0000061883384,0.0043970053,0.9394666,0.000037402333,0.00024447884,0.028480615,0.023179447,0.003356944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021138046,0.000022306722,0.00050796237,0.0006429503,0.000005556131,0.0013393239,0.88604754,0.000049527964,0.00014792793,0.0045289025,0.1066892,0.000016758233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0082774395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021969104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0286803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008557724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056821015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062090933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803009960","doi":"10.1111/conl.12562","title":"Participation in planning and social networks increase social monitoring in community‐based conservation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Division of Biological Infrastructure; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Enforcement; Business; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Resource (disambiguation); Fishing; Community-based conservation; Marine conservation; Biodiversity conservation; Biodiversity; Geography; Fishery; Political science; Economics; Ecology","score_opus":0.040876590386089026,"score_gpt":0.2689320648015439,"score_spread":0.22805547441545487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2803009960","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9855569,0.000062964915,0.0008121954,0.0007055655,0.000010917481,0.000048650694,0.000035289544,0.000012156655,0.012755427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99917835,0.00002831002,0.00022320198,0.000027252312,0.000005834747,0.000018663679,0.000014225983,0.0000013866262,0.0005027836],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99624914,0.002610796,0.000076209544,0.00029771106,0.00034384325,0.00042233567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9756134,0.013233297,0.005959773,0.0012328161,0.0008736413,0.0030870251],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004023722,0.00019874546,0.0001471099,0.00085832964,0.0016625196,0.0019352584,0.0006108045,0.0006533748,0.007208413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01782291,0.00023746723,0.00018095181,0.00060304947,0.0016097464,0.001713558,0.003044452,0.00074674026,0.00021978296],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029067943,0.0019440174,0.832875,0.00015272379,0.00011883846,0.00047083665,0.039910838,0.0012586841,0.0009899405,0.004683644,0.0020188882,0.115285866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043428274,0.00034435233,0.9443367,0.00017149452,0.0000684557,0.00016775224,0.03587967,0.00390621,0.00043974296,0.006048857,0.008570341,0.000022913218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0090946015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018990358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0090946015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012944161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011010603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02411455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2805057110","doi":"10.1111/conl.12573","title":"Generic names and mislabeling conceal high species diversity in global fisheries markets","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Identification and Quantification in Food","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions; European Commission; Horizon 2020 Framework Programme; Canadian Food Inspection Agency","keywords":"Fishery; Threatened species; Sustainability; Biodiversity; Business; DNA barcoding; Fishing; Convention on Biological Diversity; Enforcement; Lutjanidae; Natural resource economics; Biology; Ecology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Habitat; Economics","score_opus":0.030167181352913745,"score_gpt":0.23950002101430984,"score_spread":0.2093328396613961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2805057110","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912616,0.00020732888,0.0025426375,0.000623323,0.000031395495,0.000010942121,0.00013039034,0.000016746419,0.0051755365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968935,0.00012367812,0.0018082325,0.00035781178,0.000021093678,0.000006320702,0.000099976765,0.000014375367,0.0006749967],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949379,0.0020803402,0.00036871812,0.0007719312,0.001441727,0.00039934032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98161685,0.004827732,0.008679458,0.0029732136,0.0015947989,0.00030795098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00634755,0.00028966746,0.00029964288,0.002480032,0.0012898453,0.002515812,0.0007361489,0.0010525645,0.0041207755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013960685,0.0002270568,0.0002042935,0.0025394328,0.0040693358,0.0034982702,0.0026925807,0.0007800199,0.0007390404],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00069281954,0.00009373075,0.7944281,0.00028561614,0.000120028046,0.0015438879,0.02130161,0.00078032154,0.053528972,0.017107507,0.0021237147,0.107993625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024926056,0.0005484977,0.83020097,0.0005395416,0.00020028734,0.0047692065,0.05019804,0.0036549587,0.046274677,0.025820866,0.037637338,0.00013068492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019934827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044683865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00634755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009398785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058000797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033569455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810406640","doi":"10.1111/conl.12587","title":"Risk‐sensitive planning for conserving coral reefs under rapid climate change","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":240,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Bloomberg Philanthropies; Australian Research Council; Nature Conservancy; Paul G. Allen Family Foundation","keywords":"Coral reef; Climate change; Reef; Threatened species; Resilience of coral reefs; Ecosystem; Coral reef protection; Environmental resource management; Coral reef organizations; Geography; Ecology; Environmental science; Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.04945710633105515,"score_gpt":0.26049251870216716,"score_spread":0.211035412371112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2810406640","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2184854,0.0016376255,0.7168797,0.012463043,0.00019760994,0.0005270593,0.00052904856,0.00036998582,0.048910446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9456729,0.00074654,0.050583158,0.00019586107,0.00004788302,0.00017980799,0.000109780754,0.000028845732,0.0024351825],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986652,0.0008312821,0.0000402759,0.00013735444,0.00017252142,0.00015335319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970409,0.0015567483,0.0006127685,0.0001410953,0.00025088727,0.00039747596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033883692,0.0006413125,0.0005472158,0.0011150802,0.0007391657,0.0028597098,0.0010951489,0.0014809093,0.004796496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0083444705,0.0005116099,0.00052371406,0.0010370383,0.0012215554,0.0020175588,0.002618803,0.0015098613,0.00026749505],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050844592,0.00007241541,0.0020046039,0.00006447249,0.00006492526,0.00016618567,0.00016107882,0.9030932,0.0004000242,0.07572334,0.0019908543,0.01620799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024912324,0.000098392695,0.0013799845,0.00007152195,0.000033955253,0.00006328878,0.00056813157,0.7704189,0.00023886556,0.22410826,0.0029616049,0.00003214932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076249763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010129728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076249763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003181284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034813557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023081899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2819483672","doi":"10.1111/conl.12589","title":"The area–heterogeneity tradeoff applied to spatial protection of rockfish ( <i>Sebastes</i> spp.) species richness","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Tula Foundation; University of British Columbia; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; University of Victoria","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Hakai Institute; Tula Foundation; Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation","keywords":"Species richness; Spatial heterogeneity; Sebastes; Overexploitation; Habitat; Ecology; Rockfish; Range (aeronautics); Context (archaeology); Biodiversity; Biology; Fishery; Geography; Fish <Actinopterygii>","score_opus":0.02111743859189253,"score_gpt":0.19778596497893217,"score_spread":0.17666852638703964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2819483672","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973742,0.000089111796,0.0010695322,0.00012613159,0.000004134169,0.0000051479674,0.000047501824,0.0000069635057,0.0012773267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999828,0.0000062679032,0.000107746404,0.00000873778,0.0000019198237,0.000001886379,0.0000071523496,0.0000013844968,0.00003699832],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844897,0.0008066965,0.00007404163,0.00029702781,0.00019122112,0.00018196418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9830603,0.01277951,0.0019118054,0.0009313708,0.0005121426,0.00080489204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024954502,0.00024285885,0.00030277474,0.0007726428,0.0003299186,0.001104798,0.0005289145,0.00069849927,0.0038582284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012244405,0.00015368075,0.0005796443,0.00051977776,0.0012833476,0.00091873267,0.0010154601,0.0004894548,0.00013286913],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001302373,0.00015578691,0.9250463,0.00014122983,0.00081938296,0.0002878534,0.0004339596,0.028454177,0.018068725,0.004703279,0.00037602842,0.020210883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026134934,0.0006509906,0.96172446,0.000020841237,0.00019944957,0.00019516611,0.0007238905,0.028351301,0.0023336327,0.0052467217,0.0005022628,0.000025132786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043660807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004452698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0043660807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00092933537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003303262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013197362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884031310","doi":"10.1111/conl.12600","title":"Environmental governance: A practical framework to guide design, evaluation, and analysis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Sustainability and Climate Change Governance","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":358,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Liber Ero Foundation","keywords":"Corporate governance; Environmental governance; Scholarship; Project governance; Conceptual framework; Set (abstract data type); Environmental resource management; Frame (networking); Politics; Strategic environmental assessment; Environmental planning; Environmental impact assessment; Management science; Business; Political science; Computer science; Sociology; Economics; Environmental science; Social science","score_opus":0.03382824417071266,"score_gpt":0.3103279076124198,"score_spread":0.2764996634417071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884031310","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017638111,0.001003033,0.9424194,0.02513073,0.0003079647,0.007283896,0.00041126256,0.00089093175,0.020788852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015060648,0.00066119607,0.97470844,0.00095682975,0.00006584221,0.006852526,0.00022490187,0.00010415113,0.001365451],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8016403,0.16427733,0.011581904,0.0048204856,0.015342423,0.0023375826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8237154,0.10519929,0.009494957,0.022698265,0.033316433,0.0055757],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.21867871,0.003461806,0.0028350493,0.011329286,0.0059550167,0.020643111,0.008536223,0.008462098,0.011057457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17269221,0.002443288,0.0027720751,0.007816743,0.019547407,0.016561508,0.013749878,0.010608949,0.00475741],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008175226,0.00037375194,0.0016044897,0.0028557347,0.00010750057,0.0006556049,0.011161312,0.015503486,0.0014044426,0.79922485,0.029506154,0.13752094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022649392,0.00029723893,0.0009871642,0.0071018003,0.00011154818,0.00033059713,0.0090159625,0.022232434,0.0016119326,0.64191526,0.31601936,0.000150252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066199196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011572022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21867871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019052548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05263957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96350825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892341868","doi":"10.1111/conl.12604","title":"Prioritizing recovery funding to maximize conservation of endangered species","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Environment; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Global Institute for Water Security; University of Alberta; University of Saskatchewan; University of Victoria; University of British Columbia","funders":"Mitacs; Marine Environmental Observation Prediction and Response Network; Wilburforce Foundation","keywords":"Endangered species; Liberian dollar; Business; Environmental resource management; Natural resource economics; Ecology; Biology; Economics; Finance; Habitat","score_opus":0.1546035412661004,"score_gpt":0.22615833929162657,"score_spread":0.07155479802552617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892341868","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.667232,0.0009621622,0.20750552,0.0071229045,0.00012952783,0.0017605568,0.00059798954,0.00071853935,0.113970846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97022486,0.0001282996,0.02755407,0.00012350884,0.000016267515,0.00013717324,0.000054679174,0.000017591527,0.0017434508],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961514,0.0021610013,0.00013822476,0.00021026607,0.000712486,0.0006266105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99462754,0.0029390182,0.00094399165,0.00023336514,0.0008314136,0.00042465547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006830599,0.0005678036,0.00049035676,0.0028622388,0.0006014563,0.0022679013,0.00082379265,0.00076383835,0.007045661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016246537,0.00025460217,0.00024975752,0.0014271847,0.0005722866,0.0015338792,0.0012724093,0.00089206,0.00044458546],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008042767,0.00083831337,0.048469763,0.0004534631,0.00024264446,0.00044062154,0.00055497076,0.24842498,0.010911529,0.13581613,0.015960226,0.53708297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043156277,0.0011497452,0.07476506,0.00047267036,0.00023831363,0.000555423,0.0029264477,0.6793763,0.015626498,0.18888772,0.035407946,0.0001622413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072615608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013733755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072615608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003000344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061252536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03612411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898187698","doi":"10.1111/conl.12613","title":"Diverse knowledge systems reveal social–ecological dynamics that inform species conservation status","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Island University; Pacific Insight Electronics (Canada); Simon Fraser University","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Simon Fraser University; Hakai Institute; Canada Foundation for Innovation; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Pew Charitable Trusts","keywords":"Ecology; Geography; Endangered species; Traditional knowledge; Population; Neglect; Environmental resource management; Habitat; Biology; Sociology; Indigenous; Environmental science; Psychology","score_opus":0.05185339447546001,"score_gpt":0.26771322191995206,"score_spread":0.21585982744449206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898187698","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9607203,0.00044272895,0.007890851,0.0011107888,0.000009360253,0.000047177287,0.0012486308,0.00004556043,0.028484683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970367,0.00009136086,0.0020560417,0.000052071286,0.0000022341876,0.00001046155,0.0003311442,0.0000046091905,0.00041526867],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914956,0.00023035366,0.000053949025,0.00023017668,0.00021127154,0.00012468184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952739,0.0019782332,0.0009824446,0.00048671674,0.0010107339,0.00026811697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016600824,0.00021640082,0.0002131331,0.0042427476,0.0011400464,0.004834824,0.0004447124,0.00041893544,0.0032295128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0090044625,0.00019142382,0.00023189372,0.0034367465,0.002423664,0.004010846,0.0027793902,0.0004479448,0.00020039601],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012244527,0.00009083909,0.804773,0.00029832593,0.0003500541,0.00039701312,0.032282323,0.0052105556,0.0045550936,0.03448436,0.002145357,0.11529079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017430084,0.000066642155,0.8201459,0.00034783952,0.00022895695,0.00023131566,0.04794109,0.019891378,0.0016804988,0.083507046,0.025874235,0.00006751973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09444831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14915001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09444831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043481044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003058878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18779713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904855160","doi":"10.1111/conl.12617","title":"Mapping global human dependence on marine ecosystems","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":195,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Rockefeller Foundation","keywords":"Ecosystem; Marine ecosystem; Environmental resource management; Ecosystem services; Scale (ratio); Marine protected area; Range (aeronautics); Environmental science; Geography; Ecology; Cartography; Biology","score_opus":0.13241929340685218,"score_gpt":0.3301905235350822,"score_spread":0.19777123012823003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904855160","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98360336,0.00016432244,0.006028924,0.0005908707,0.0000044549747,0.00001785489,0.0027676942,0.000044439446,0.0067780847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99809426,0.00007608996,0.0011910284,0.00002090563,0.0000014192149,0.000011042137,0.00043915954,0.0000029035764,0.00016324676],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999696,0.00014240787,0.000012692602,0.00006708575,0.000041700278,0.000040086703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984761,0.0006907981,0.00035972585,0.0001776694,0.0002016446,0.00009410617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072156347,0.00025775933,0.00018174671,0.0020474459,0.000266161,0.0007960598,0.00030903585,0.0002940808,0.0030604852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032933927,0.00011337246,0.00032818512,0.0030513376,0.00055311096,0.0010239235,0.0013153565,0.00033887153,0.00015913935],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041055137,0.000039311613,0.92995995,0.000081558625,0.0001605019,0.000077309596,0.0007767345,0.032468554,0.00051206455,0.0064793713,0.0017422633,0.02766137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011444039,0.00009076359,0.8639977,0.00012649814,0.000081314116,0.00021240386,0.0048093568,0.10380385,0.00063992065,0.018308945,0.007871756,0.000046087775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033112295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026902623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033112295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075953087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004505992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06583911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911315302","doi":"10.1111/conl.12627","title":"Are we eating the world's megafauna to extinction?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":196,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Megafauna; Threatened species; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Ecology; Extant taxon; Range (aeronautics); Population; Biology; Geography; Near-threatened species; Habitat; Environmental health; Archaeology; Evolutionary biology","score_opus":0.015931986083060626,"score_gpt":0.22803513543451234,"score_spread":0.21210314935145172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911315302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8663263,0.024759121,0.001067112,0.08239204,0.0005567729,0.0000092911805,0.0004712099,0.000050378952,0.024367737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825549,0.008278625,0.00023215021,0.0061465395,0.00042538837,0.0000063005086,0.00018067622,0.000009950411,0.0021654281],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996284,0.00008625605,0.0000166374,0.000072008006,0.00008721506,0.00010938584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968156,0.0006353938,0.0011568903,0.0001735813,0.0005710059,0.0006474634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001218701,0.00017580122,0.0003188757,0.0011293315,0.0010871368,0.002192417,0.00051187986,0.000967221,0.012143542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060019367,0.00011703825,0.00015491706,0.0009651906,0.0022276868,0.0023763517,0.00083827606,0.0014130917,0.0008093366],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024434982,0.00009406386,0.78683007,0.0003293712,0.00022906346,0.0009766773,0.0066734455,0.0002170465,0.0013604469,0.005785926,0.0263896,0.17086996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000876475,0.000083721505,0.908493,0.0007437055,0.000060812687,0.0015304945,0.025538063,0.00025130933,0.00029945275,0.014289518,0.04865923,0.000042034146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00548929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008315339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012143542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005624198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038741075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0406242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914852469","doi":"10.1111/conl.12634","title":"Should potential for climate change refugia be mainstreamed into the criteria for describing EBSAs?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bedford Institute of Oceanography; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Refugium (fishkeeping); Identification (biology); Biodiversity; Scope (computer science); Environmental resource management; Ecology; Convention on Biological Diversity; Environmental science; Geography; Computer science; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.10287056075219664,"score_gpt":0.2945177494235709,"score_spread":0.19164718867137426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914852469","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.070188425,0.011426697,0.4449056,0.2556246,0.015605204,0.0008067554,0.0012695852,0.00079058943,0.19938248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6197083,0.0022091551,0.32773113,0.028107626,0.0041177543,0.00084962754,0.00073226757,0.0003367562,0.016207363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893177,0.005253364,0.0018362107,0.0007226559,0.0022510567,0.0006189648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95445377,0.015853018,0.0043117204,0.0040254937,0.018608795,0.0027472512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019306622,0.00058357074,0.0011688849,0.004253868,0.0045564533,0.0069986503,0.005002774,0.0051612314,0.004570357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05225251,0.00033889964,0.0011748357,0.0020530606,0.01747915,0.007007202,0.004956647,0.009458204,0.0016089429],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000107252265,0.000064809916,0.0118079595,0.0004864607,0.00004360412,0.00056286895,0.003883227,0.0017444876,0.00093789847,0.8806479,0.047372922,0.052340586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003910163,0.0001369199,0.0093691405,0.0018550119,0.00006263015,0.0015561344,0.008169918,0.0096896915,0.0015009807,0.63520175,0.33224145,0.00017724295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071846256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015419484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019306622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031312779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003947568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.102104366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2919678899","doi":"10.1111/conl.12638","title":"Marine protected areas enhance coral reef functioning by promoting fish biodiversity","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Smithsonian Institution","keywords":"Coral reef; Marine protected area; Biodiversity; Herbivore; Ecology; Marine reserve; Ecosystem; Marine ecosystem; Species richness; Resilience of coral reefs; Reef; Ecosystem-based management; Geography; Fishery; Biology; Fishing; Habitat","score_opus":0.007000779390336795,"score_gpt":0.17495141479157855,"score_spread":0.16795063540124175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2919678899","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9749595,0.014435752,0.002535338,0.0010779267,0.000071667615,0.000041360203,0.00084220135,0.00009467237,0.0059414883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997922,0.0012143335,0.0005155963,0.00006999321,0.00001977466,0.0000050048257,0.000071399096,0.0000068696227,0.00017509413],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990702,0.000499954,0.000059495207,0.0001890231,0.00009416118,0.000087106375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99586236,0.0017532122,0.001309256,0.00040238388,0.00020423866,0.00046856617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019743952,0.00046489213,0.0003938648,0.0017674614,0.00032153862,0.0014844616,0.00046946964,0.000401736,0.0041498756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036825724,0.00023414877,0.0018176473,0.0013304321,0.00053122756,0.00056683226,0.0012412919,0.00043540224,0.00013800198],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005480119,0.00017712737,0.9224581,0.0017159319,0.029966654,0.0002032932,0.00021622583,0.0044069765,0.0036972854,0.0021473034,0.0006523237,0.033810787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004935449,0.00031334415,0.9810346,0.00040797258,0.008038051,0.000130554,0.00036530552,0.0040469794,0.0009118352,0.0017804289,0.0029036142,0.000018020039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055579706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007843236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055579706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043038352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051438727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013882756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921400248","doi":"10.1111/conl.12640","title":"Local support for conservation is associated with perceptions of good governance, social impacts, and ecological effectiveness","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":275,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Interreg; European Regional Development Fund","keywords":"Corporate governance; Marine protected area; Scale (ratio); Environmental resource management; Survey data collection; Perception; Business; Ordinal regression; Multilevel model; Environmental planning; Ecology; Geography; Economics; Psychology; Biology","score_opus":0.008700314782114905,"score_gpt":0.21569215538842793,"score_spread":0.206991840606313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921400248","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99914455,0.000018707347,0.00003189975,0.00006473332,0.0000011211303,0.000002144537,0.00002133632,8.918309e-7,0.0007146435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998821,0.000010846232,0.000022644046,0.0000053619824,0.0000014641519,0.0000012764118,0.000017271212,2.2393193e-7,0.000058748643],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952686,0.00016002152,0.00004669682,0.00005965965,0.0001076239,0.000099129815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98865557,0.002837589,0.0055871815,0.00038374474,0.0006763954,0.0018595747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093226414,0.000107564134,0.00015241173,0.0007618291,0.00037091164,0.0006772427,0.0001923034,0.0003413362,0.0049901213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068250992,0.00009611589,0.00014015152,0.0006059856,0.00079326186,0.0003453946,0.0006895632,0.00045080006,0.00020372415],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001769825,0.000045655903,0.99788374,0.0000061172445,0.000015999836,0.00002476428,0.00033158012,0.000051330793,0.00008517948,0.000042823583,0.00007273624,0.0014225373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012957869,0.000022723376,0.9989243,0.000004551541,0.000002862843,0.000014717573,0.00079996284,0.0000995172,0.000015658963,0.000027383418,0.00008546215,0.0000014657572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005406308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010987488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005406308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030284404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024955688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016693652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2933098123","doi":"10.1111/conl.12646","title":"Restoration priorities to achieve the global protected area target","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"Horizon 2020 Framework Programme; University of Queensland","keywords":"Protected area; Environmental resource management; Agriculture; Restoration ecology; Land degradation; Environmental science; Geography; Agroforestry; Environmental protection; Environmental planning; Natural resource economics; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.010715164478637101,"score_gpt":0.18973021448308175,"score_spread":0.17901505000444465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2933098123","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28050512,0.012600599,0.040687796,0.09033534,0.0022383768,0.00036402358,0.0015255299,0.0010937853,0.5706495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9593166,0.0025738105,0.016830668,0.009217996,0.00022138185,0.00016617127,0.0008135252,0.00010619961,0.010753633],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988682,0.0003136351,0.000038032187,0.000113954695,0.00027837374,0.0003878643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986451,0.00015735361,0.00019353347,0.00010510289,0.0004601514,0.00043877796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023966464,0.0005849453,0.0003905659,0.00081150397,0.0012461755,0.0026352948,0.00059186516,0.0011424425,0.012560322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002375697,0.00013314448,0.00025318438,0.0006488965,0.0010297755,0.0017293617,0.0027229218,0.0019471769,0.001766818],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038437545,0.00042708768,0.09437849,0.001190831,0.00018805824,0.0011221446,0.0025716394,0.020776367,0.025870621,0.13202094,0.32391393,0.39715558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006684783,0.00041938457,0.15428603,0.00096568116,0.00011553177,0.0017496109,0.009854669,0.011132914,0.0057671485,0.10665225,0.70888424,0.00010566645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072437353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014613583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012560322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018649955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046438775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042018414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949997267","doi":"10.1111/conl.12659","title":"The prevalence, characteristics and effectiveness of Aichi Target 11′s “other effective area‐based conservation measures” (OECMs) in Key Biodiversity Areas","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Birds Canada","funders":"Arcadia Fund","keywords":"Biodiversity; Geography; Biodiversity conservation; Environmental resource management; Ecosystem services; Indigenous; Conservation Plan; Global biodiversity; Agroforestry; Ecosystem; Environmental protection; Environmental planning; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.007806679245545019,"score_gpt":0.1797448345065453,"score_spread":0.1719381552610003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949997267","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965532,0.00024832756,0.00013350953,0.000064377775,0.0000047562335,0.000017230332,0.0004879416,0.000005047605,0.002485565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996381,0.000054430908,0.00006721128,0.000009710019,0.0000013245589,0.0000056832114,0.00014977047,7.765441e-7,0.0000730129],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798477,0.0007190404,0.00026014788,0.00025249235,0.000446769,0.00033674095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880266,0.0025411888,0.006301937,0.00076418294,0.0014329811,0.00093310885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020072649,0.0001405384,0.00017369578,0.0016966114,0.00030736395,0.0007020252,0.00047283823,0.00026818403,0.0020384272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006203476,0.00011921907,0.00020548714,0.0017561403,0.0011166938,0.00067248964,0.0009541711,0.00032626963,0.00013819517],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061682695,0.000025964839,0.9903746,0.00005125554,0.000039638766,0.000056567336,0.00026351266,0.0002756876,0.00015758035,0.00024533703,0.00040991083,0.00803825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019826257,0.000047543595,0.9986998,0.000022321605,0.0000067517126,0.00007070962,0.000597778,0.00016755947,0.00007346588,0.000041511506,0.00026672884,0.000003904276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012745296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027191177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012745296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059866766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043555832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025342226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969674343","doi":"10.1111/conl.12669","title":"Genetics of century‐old fish scales reveal population patterns of decline","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; W. Garfield Weston Foundation","keywords":"Fishing; Abundance (ecology); Fishery; Geography; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Ecology; Biology; Commercial fishing; Population; Watershed; Population decline; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.009308144588887835,"score_gpt":0.21024262018350154,"score_spread":0.2009344755946137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969674343","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99788684,0.000090673544,0.00046653225,0.000052042527,0.0000037710415,0.0000022076988,0.00024354548,0.000008482666,0.0012458324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991129,0.000044651813,0.00026286588,0.000035263995,0.000003153638,0.0000043825917,0.00015734386,0.000005994156,0.00037351297],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998362,0.000027807291,0.000009409916,0.000060824408,0.0000397834,0.000025933216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993337,0.00013820386,0.0002151913,0.00006664645,0.00016804456,0.00007816677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005694317,0.00008426496,0.00013678608,0.0011365943,0.00038217803,0.00052414724,0.00022943318,0.00019966954,0.0009864687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00095249974,0.00011796452,0.000101951606,0.0009245225,0.00063806475,0.0002641152,0.0004322351,0.0003748228,0.000121711215],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059893802,0.000021264625,0.9676301,0.000010197693,0.000074121876,0.00006944471,0.0011389354,0.00034733416,0.021055289,0.0006404161,0.000364853,0.008588131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010958347,0.000008112588,0.99857545,0.000002087907,0.000005880118,0.000037280774,0.00022589679,0.0001846401,0.00029186698,0.00014272073,0.00052250567,0.0000025452762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011627025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038414557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011627025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006815851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025389894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023118675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2984855636","doi":"10.1111/conl.12683","title":"Alternative pathways to sustainable seafood","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Certification; Sustainability; Business; Adaptive management; Overfishing; Dilemma; Agency (philosophy); Environmental resource management; Fisheries management; Payment; Resource (disambiguation); Fishing; Environmental planning; Fishery; Economics; Computer science; Ecology; Geography","score_opus":0.022289219532645257,"score_gpt":0.23874553260032036,"score_spread":0.2164563130676751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2984855636","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03884329,0.0023731403,0.049245995,0.07087499,0.0006637517,0.0002306581,0.00012955478,0.00017765957,0.8374609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92305434,0.0026089228,0.017855836,0.0039992095,0.00016671338,0.00021550356,0.00010395958,0.000069158225,0.05192631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99717474,0.0012418864,0.00008960054,0.00040579995,0.0005995996,0.0004883256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973917,0.0005504977,0.00028171125,0.00040343558,0.0007861434,0.0005864735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003389527,0.00068308134,0.00025420196,0.0018192806,0.002976951,0.011910952,0.0017918403,0.004323401,0.03218028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049210577,0.00027185585,0.00060121843,0.0017176822,0.011269852,0.009990457,0.008881961,0.0030870873,0.0028420556],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000120398145,0.00004599238,0.00033979895,0.00006119246,0.000006075347,0.00011382431,0.0005772652,0.0011259911,0.00008647297,0.9833339,0.0030173876,0.011280144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019336354,0.00004841602,0.00048631782,0.0002913765,0.0000088971365,0.00010248694,0.0037907902,0.0024781106,0.00029920856,0.8502158,0.14223762,0.000021706514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040362333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008155639,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03218028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006537351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071320063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10765374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2986116554","doi":"10.1111/conl.12688","title":"Estimating IUCN Red List population reduction: JARA—A decision‐support tool applied to pelagic sharks","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Ichthyology and Marine Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Canada Research Chairs; National Science Foundation","keywords":"IUCN Red List; Population; Fishery; Pelagic zone; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.00912453144891198,"score_gpt":0.2299447889948066,"score_spread":0.22082025754589463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2986116554","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11987531,0.0001870172,0.81133723,0.0020377734,0.00022906878,0.00055677764,0.008927322,0.045826104,0.011023361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34297457,0.00007603783,0.6504643,0.00025831678,0.00005751351,0.0005262425,0.002813553,0.0012179264,0.0016115026],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978339,0.0014435207,0.00014433161,0.00023014097,0.0002765405,0.000071586284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842337,0.011451888,0.0011431532,0.00066091516,0.002072373,0.00043800293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01163171,0.0010174904,0.0008757714,0.0030794584,0.00071695354,0.0020019037,0.0017828142,0.0010935825,0.013882031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030679192,0.0007049335,0.0009068849,0.00089875254,0.00044463802,0.0014402445,0.0014348952,0.0010348728,0.0022029746],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00095354894,0.00050195574,0.03335244,0.0004794551,0.00047918814,0.00036607657,0.0006074322,0.6485219,0.0031824654,0.012983669,0.060779925,0.23779203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048647067,0.000032158994,0.00093829265,0.000035687925,0.000022149165,0.000016839145,0.00006642707,0.9916956,0.00082626194,0.0036938996,0.0026026925,0.000021302207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008152885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008940945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013882031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007566989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015152848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061515093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991334764","doi":"10.1111/conl.12692","title":"Substantial losses in ecoregion intactness highlight urgency of globally coordinated action","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Ecosystem dynamics and resilience","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":101,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Ecoregion; Habitat; Fragmentation (computing); Environmental resource management; Habitat fragmentation; Geography; Ecosystem; Metric (unit); Habitat destruction; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology; Business","score_opus":0.008279743798552834,"score_gpt":0.21643324494359295,"score_spread":0.2081535011450401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991334764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98866934,0.0003123351,0.0012472748,0.0003645339,0.000007198749,0.000012372533,0.0005814345,0.000038436945,0.008767109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99930036,0.000053043896,0.00024173231,0.000020642266,0.000002227762,0.0000021922203,0.00012806902,0.0000043312634,0.00024736713],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995066,0.00008907844,0.000038262613,0.000095122945,0.0001274872,0.0001434359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99572396,0.00039356068,0.0021158939,0.00064597215,0.0005982986,0.00052234076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009883808,0.0001582392,0.0002513679,0.001249159,0.0006017487,0.0013188608,0.00046062106,0.00019783643,0.003487371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00310846,0.00007799715,0.00019797569,0.0015504491,0.001720317,0.001395911,0.002259642,0.00050212035,0.00020489433],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019026619,0.000028246632,0.91438854,0.00013108355,0.00015448393,0.00039090397,0.0034928073,0.003564881,0.007373323,0.0031302546,0.0015471828,0.065608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.495871e-7,0.000028243068,0.99364156,0.000022832204,0.000007715602,0.00012269143,0.0019354745,0.00037760998,0.00027842468,0.0013359728,0.0022430376,0.000005741206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013134777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027729325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013134777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00090927165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073621806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02611667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995329444","doi":"10.1111/conl.12696","title":"Growth‐inducing infrastructure represents transformative yet ignored keystone environmental decisions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wildlife Conservation Society Canada; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Environmental resource management; Business; Legislation; Anthropocene; Environmental planning; Unintended consequences; Ecological footprint; Process (computing); Climate change; Natural resource economics; Environmental economics; Economics; Computer science; Ecology; Environmental science; Political science","score_opus":0.005413565023851529,"score_gpt":0.20323210141283285,"score_spread":0.1978185363889813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995329444","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09896017,0.0027134514,0.13885908,0.07854306,0.0006649529,0.0003122489,0.00021957827,0.00019345384,0.679534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94612765,0.001954544,0.0226056,0.0039528557,0.00023399355,0.00020953834,0.00006746582,0.00006331424,0.024784954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99012744,0.0050606793,0.000354225,0.0007862303,0.0028576986,0.0008137713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9765704,0.015949395,0.0023649065,0.0018809519,0.0026764176,0.00055790774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075871767,0.0003637865,0.00033128148,0.0014016432,0.0032166203,0.012898532,0.00081778865,0.0031302555,0.007625701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017576266,0.00026030504,0.00036034605,0.001526888,0.015977966,0.009260809,0.003858183,0.003150388,0.0009345382],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025053669,0.00002999973,0.0025670312,0.00015188943,0.000010012435,0.00021740749,0.0018160617,0.003044847,0.0006707942,0.954739,0.0057121627,0.031015689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007190092,0.00007124861,0.003911397,0.00033931492,0.000014408456,0.00021666952,0.0057890723,0.003764184,0.0027193518,0.79425466,0.18887077,0.000041836112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028775476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009229702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012898532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070042633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005840473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050819695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004707592","doi":"10.1111/conl.12698","title":"Fishing restrictions and remoteness deliver conservation outcomes for Indonesia's coral reef fisheries","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation; Walton Family Foundation; David and Lucile Packard Foundation","keywords":"Coral reef; Fishery; Reef; Marine protected area; Biomass (ecology); Fishing; Coral reef fish; Pelagic zone; Marine reserve; Planktivore; Trophic level; Coral reef protection; Environmental science; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.03452458949102328,"score_gpt":0.21889828356501861,"score_spread":0.18437369407399534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004707592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.993273,0.0001698848,0.0000655046,0.0002320281,0.0000068805507,0.000005453885,0.00028523564,0.0000035532728,0.0059584496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99905664,0.0000767962,0.00006184039,0.00003423629,0.0000037836585,0.0000036059737,0.00011387255,0.0000015050726,0.00064779614],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998103,0.000041666757,0.00002231548,0.00003795915,0.000043615863,0.000044154833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853754,0.00026984277,0.0006655548,0.00008715114,0.0001475907,0.00029234923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038589488,0.00019983733,0.00014853323,0.0005228337,0.0004987602,0.0008818624,0.00020931593,0.00014342621,0.008496307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018786473,0.0000636349,0.0002320428,0.0005005095,0.0004066737,0.00072938617,0.0012225774,0.000386453,0.00034627126],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083170686,0.00006369928,0.98700047,0.000034433448,0.00003315351,0.00015728374,0.00032041053,0.0002969633,0.0003512862,0.00014193758,0.0003907295,0.011126496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016592999,0.000022810622,0.99801046,0.000018056531,0.000013854883,0.000057988127,0.0011227021,0.00020801727,0.00007598416,0.00011398559,0.00035155716,0.0000029226512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016835054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045016985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016835054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043479045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042665706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033474147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006088137","doi":"10.1111/conl.12708","title":"Shark fin trade bans and sustainable shark fisheries","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Ichthyology and Marine Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nova Scotia Department of Agriculture","funders":"Fondation Bertarelli","keywords":"Fisheries management; Fishery; Business; Fin; Fishing; Biology; Engineering","score_opus":0.01229694197628083,"score_gpt":0.1890696754189955,"score_spread":0.17677273344271466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006088137","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0057768486,0.85299724,0.0021172722,0.06805578,0.0077371923,0.000021244077,0.00024083501,0.000046708923,0.06300686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14337821,0.7850567,0.0019701708,0.049630918,0.006198631,0.00008249525,0.000354425,0.000034862696,0.013293627],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99748343,0.0008169029,0.00023233201,0.00029793865,0.0010394212,0.00013003359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98903894,0.0070785377,0.001653952,0.00022655498,0.0017894197,0.00021258266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030560235,0.00032652728,0.00036074856,0.0017680285,0.00076240464,0.0026872798,0.00070646446,0.002447734,0.006243738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007716171,0.00013925115,0.0005880699,0.0015187821,0.0027644115,0.0021447162,0.0010629208,0.003098897,0.00067964883],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012763585,0.00009778483,0.0034804982,0.013827464,0.00021210866,0.00046689366,0.0008244582,0.0011603364,0.0013669,0.31175318,0.15302415,0.5136586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012015107,0.000052418407,0.0044135083,0.016921144,0.00013449848,0.0003460694,0.00061424606,0.00018137487,0.00076752866,0.039774243,0.9367578,0.000025114769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062067667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075203977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006243738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022496541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039808177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020887375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009405930","doi":"10.1111/conl.12711","title":"Marine biodiversity offsets: Pragmatic approaches toward better conservation outcomes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Environmental Conservation and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Marine protected area; Biodiversity; Marine biodiversity; Environmental resource management; Biodiversity conservation; Geography; Marine conservation; Environmental science; Environmental planning; Ecology; Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.05005658748178925,"score_gpt":0.19901980444412154,"score_spread":0.14896321696233228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3009405930","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029154383,0.0037753105,0.22516388,0.23541108,0.0015561947,0.0011507926,0.00031018996,0.00039400795,0.5030842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8619178,0.0017091287,0.10365751,0.020757448,0.0006430215,0.0015883297,0.00011140233,0.00015375603,0.009461616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9555569,0.030800331,0.0018390991,0.0020758961,0.007326239,0.0024014662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9739909,0.014041841,0.003007383,0.0026791668,0.003799191,0.002481483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.044123635,0.0010604004,0.00093645055,0.0031173206,0.0038297903,0.013456661,0.0021610917,0.005688844,0.018178392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060130343,0.000572327,0.0008130826,0.0017805473,0.015589149,0.010934062,0.0184441,0.0065487446,0.0012770158],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004660222,0.00008406243,0.0007048026,0.00037567643,0.000044226235,0.00011173248,0.0010026545,0.0024017438,0.00025135878,0.9590944,0.006857165,0.0290257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051352436,0.00008302621,0.00081531605,0.0007436164,0.00003698763,0.00008917458,0.001769296,0.0025034673,0.0003412719,0.9523834,0.041143674,0.00003963254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017202368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034370748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044123635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006723747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012269703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23335087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012626046","doi":"10.1111/conl.12714","title":"The elephant in the room: Madagascar's rosewood stocks and stockpiles","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Global Environment Facility","keywords":"Business; Stock (firearms); Natural resource economics; Speculation; Finance; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.014068513683024817,"score_gpt":0.18100772300721996,"score_spread":0.16693920932419515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012626046","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96187884,0.0011924404,0.000037144393,0.0083280895,0.000035344223,0.0000048984534,0.00010878173,0.0000029361263,0.028411586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960147,0.0005084644,0.00003327353,0.00028599025,0.000025224821,0.0000020031418,0.000028260052,0.0000012874336,0.003100896],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99993086,0.000017035876,0.0000018770078,0.0000071074237,0.000015778347,0.000027402175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996537,0.000103689,0.00012781788,0.000009295088,0.00003877691,0.00006670868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020874552,0.00011012254,0.00006719008,0.00052083615,0.0014479967,0.0015167833,0.00024015925,0.00036191213,0.008326666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00075419,0.00003335993,0.000050454833,0.00060159765,0.0008811291,0.0007938808,0.0007828835,0.0004396105,0.00014479554],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036677337,0.00018274997,0.6187375,0.00028623675,0.000076953416,0.009118109,0.08629828,0.0006617714,0.0038862026,0.04752521,0.02922247,0.20363778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000081707385,0.00015058107,0.6843698,0.00031326676,0.00004449449,0.0013326013,0.2211264,0.0008578784,0.0009202857,0.0047584698,0.08608386,0.000034175257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042134017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.117282614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042134017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010080674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000442945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08377755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3015920337","doi":"10.1111/conl.12712","title":"Toward a climate‐informed North American protected areas network: Incorporating climate‐change refugia and corridors in conservation planning","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":125,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Wilburforce Foundation","keywords":"Climate change; Biome; Geography; Biodiversity; Environmental resource management; Bird conservation; Protected area; Ecology; Environmental science; Ecosystem; Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.06840927981302351,"score_gpt":0.2551232882555648,"score_spread":0.18671400844254127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3015920337","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77671176,0.00056506135,0.18856737,0.00505534,0.000033608412,0.00048481763,0.0018475977,0.00032778853,0.026406722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8283945,0.0001498757,0.170161,0.00013972457,0.000009862201,0.00017968027,0.00036453837,0.00002199968,0.0005789346],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845946,0.0011523006,0.000040199688,0.00017024938,0.0001020273,0.000075768716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972258,0.0009482601,0.00073954277,0.00035235123,0.00047946416,0.0002545888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004909925,0.00024620703,0.00022220502,0.0021343445,0.0008616023,0.0022687614,0.00062143395,0.00034123534,0.0016836757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075907246,0.00025819786,0.00017109238,0.0024008125,0.00063121907,0.0020477928,0.0016452083,0.0005169188,0.00009217716],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011510041,0.00027362182,0.40137944,0.00021535758,0.00023345866,0.00015675959,0.003357215,0.3049666,0.0020862774,0.035034563,0.0070367362,0.24514484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050312905,0.00013259516,0.23685874,0.00038678967,0.00013304342,0.00011811356,0.009991856,0.6401589,0.0017126498,0.08041166,0.029952578,0.00009283022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02791815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1456181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97208184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016895786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032847873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055511296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016660471","doi":"10.1111/conl.12713","title":"Biodiversity policy beyond economic growth","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":278,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Western Forest Products; University of British Columbia","funders":"Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; Seventh Framework Programme; Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften","keywords":"Biodiversity; Natural resource economics; Biodiversity conservation; Environmental resource management; Environmental policy; Geography; Business; Environmental planning; Environmental science; Economics; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.02370426302166202,"score_gpt":0.23288756445517617,"score_spread":0.20918330143351416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3016660471","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005189241,0.9607077,0.0006755358,0.0145538775,0.0011952978,0.0000059658937,0.00003347861,0.00001625259,0.022292888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024862926,0.9618433,0.00059685105,0.007710053,0.0010957553,0.000021451615,0.00005773192,0.000011937173,0.0037999882],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923384,0.0002990535,0.00003625036,0.00010911984,0.00021315987,0.00010865587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985896,0.0008627993,0.0001408758,0.00007628601,0.0002270018,0.000103449696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014973411,0.0007341506,0.0006651275,0.0018134622,0.00075626996,0.0027584643,0.00081477105,0.0021793782,0.0060416576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002991486,0.0001479376,0.0004970372,0.0025059544,0.0026259692,0.0045435703,0.0021537286,0.0031489143,0.001244436],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043316715,0.00004238744,0.00030899356,0.01135712,0.000085253756,0.00016949262,0.00034548788,0.0014484606,0.00047829023,0.48351422,0.058567606,0.44363937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004802042,0.000016672118,0.00048314588,0.007654525,0.000026372141,0.00013137583,0.00025591213,0.00013062685,0.00013946048,0.076729305,0.9144186,0.000009231256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034038497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035182256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060416576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002148295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005518326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020211339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022456161","doi":"10.1111/conl.12724","title":"Evaluating the relationships between the legal and illegal international wildlife trades","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Simons Foundation","keywords":"Wildlife; Wildlife trade; Wildlife conservation; Geography; Environmental resource management; Wildlife management; Business; Environmental planning; Environmental protection; Environmental science; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.16341409551783145,"score_gpt":0.3213287528940165,"score_spread":0.15791465737618507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022456161","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.994666,0.00036641385,0.00076432375,0.00017206029,0.000015789823,0.000012670225,0.0010918325,0.000005566906,0.0029053858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982845,0.00013537968,0.00040602539,0.000022315236,0.000016404167,0.000008727287,0.00075792475,0.000004514601,0.0003640994],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985191,0.0005072005,0.00023696093,0.0002443106,0.00033285771,0.00015956469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97874314,0.0080897985,0.009659929,0.0007837403,0.00206128,0.0006620728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024408775,0.0001732003,0.00019975084,0.0023064096,0.00039712564,0.0013873455,0.0004049402,0.0003339776,0.0031120053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014883638,0.00012966037,0.00034200036,0.0027860089,0.00050889427,0.0012535027,0.0011119547,0.00056157244,0.00026331388],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026125887,0.000017434892,0.9964167,0.000015941856,0.000083427374,0.000047983027,0.00010054466,0.00022416678,0.00007078215,0.00017951668,0.00010886783,0.0027085175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.432146e-7,0.000030758616,0.9976634,0.000021067872,0.000021821776,0.00009673649,0.00054999103,0.0007895275,0.000086235465,0.00018925715,0.0005465695,0.0000040278896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009573238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021477526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009573238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046756823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040095494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019035041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3026633123","doi":"10.1111/conl.12719","title":"Dams and protected areas: Quantifying the spatial and temporal extent of global dam construction within protected areas","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"World Wildlife Fund; Conservation International; U.S. Department of State","keywords":"Hydropower; Biodiversity; Environmental science; Ecosystem; Environmental resource management; Geography; Water resource management; Environmental protection; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.02413928660459595,"score_gpt":0.22975422119797656,"score_spread":0.20561493459338062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3026633123","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939552,0.00021879746,0.0010328623,0.000056246736,0.0000039368592,0.000010152515,0.0022148152,0.000017915136,0.0024901102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978769,0.000094518335,0.0008424231,0.000007810416,0.0000044120893,0.000012034664,0.0009114462,0.0000043620344,0.00024617076],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961686,0.000104205516,0.00003483843,0.0001090339,0.00007110266,0.00006395344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959031,0.0011960544,0.002143478,0.00023433568,0.00032465294,0.00019834265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089996075,0.00013462153,0.000099495584,0.0023084888,0.00014728915,0.00056702807,0.00021186375,0.00017686636,0.0013954072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034536861,0.00009574129,0.0001568818,0.0029185226,0.00040222,0.0006771832,0.0008593832,0.00019826509,0.00018209433],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002407483,0.000010498965,0.9857239,0.000023581324,0.000040794872,0.000021453478,0.00031217202,0.0019515152,0.0003304443,0.0002699908,0.00037291314,0.01091855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.650348e-7,0.0000148915915,0.9965783,0.000015020271,0.000010502153,0.000027014401,0.0004847755,0.0015852138,0.000090245136,0.000113897586,0.0010755471,0.000003754792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012965314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033198632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012965314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034222624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030283362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025779724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3080565440","doi":"10.1111/conl.12751","title":"A green new deal for the oceans must prioritize social justice beyond infrastructure","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Coastal and Marine Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Vision; Sustainability; Climate change; Indigenous; Environmental justice; Climate justice; Political science; Business; Economic growth; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Geography; Sociology; Economics; Ecology","score_opus":0.01608838794730084,"score_gpt":0.21754416515746222,"score_spread":0.2014557772101614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3080565440","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003946255,0.01107082,0.005762484,0.8507386,0.012707278,0.000078156045,0.00014793835,0.00014406208,0.11540447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14914982,0.020183802,0.011084187,0.7287975,0.006423805,0.00026394823,0.0003300993,0.00055396545,0.08321288],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98790205,0.0036564085,0.000368693,0.00093150564,0.004388289,0.0027530435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859774,0.0046665035,0.0008925202,0.0009075918,0.0038401666,0.003715853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009557273,0.0007633341,0.00070814125,0.0017091483,0.0114795985,0.030818162,0.0019760733,0.017769258,0.014488723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018373417,0.00038890273,0.0010443726,0.0015528803,0.017985906,0.021884713,0.016897755,0.021898419,0.0035824191],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036124788,0.00007190188,0.0016973473,0.00044286755,0.00003827156,0.00020911492,0.0062914016,0.00032916816,0.0003760705,0.50134325,0.41791755,0.071246855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068407867,0.000018925937,0.0008048718,0.0005435917,0.000010317494,0.000058405392,0.0062347795,0.00012489916,0.00021152418,0.06974403,0.9222083,0.000033508895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02446882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05858474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030818162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011434385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032029446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08296269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081200383","doi":"10.1111/conl.12753","title":"Policy interactions in large‐scale marine protected areas","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Waitt Foundation; Oak Foundation","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Marine protected area; Scale (ratio); Marine conservation; Environmental resource management; Business; Environmental planning; Geography; Ecology; Economics; Habitat","score_opus":0.01777540318705314,"score_gpt":0.23233870838854737,"score_spread":0.21456330520149422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081200383","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77515924,0.0012011424,0.0109625645,0.013835385,0.000104177234,0.00030691383,0.00024913243,0.00008309813,0.19809832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975574,0.00010653905,0.00072397,0.00023894601,0.000008395977,0.000057697194,0.000017330747,0.0000066437533,0.0012830007],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923374,0.0044081863,0.00025316596,0.0005595814,0.00088425045,0.0015574442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98813486,0.006207063,0.0027577817,0.0006511705,0.0010717536,0.0011773877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008479071,0.00027622638,0.00034807177,0.0015526252,0.004085126,0.0056215664,0.0010783836,0.0014581756,0.009630204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013464253,0.0002437875,0.00039994312,0.0022134453,0.0051702494,0.0037162916,0.006342386,0.0017692331,0.00024487588],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025750016,0.00057925936,0.17160998,0.00048696814,0.00041938826,0.0015169615,0.012600927,0.053060096,0.003454632,0.6840368,0.006777251,0.065200254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008406604,0.00045351376,0.3655278,0.0009085517,0.00022413892,0.00040344236,0.056765534,0.030880123,0.0023184114,0.33848488,0.20379221,0.0001573748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020725958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04136816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020725958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014554813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007864159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10560304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081319147","doi":"10.1111/conl.12745","title":"Squeezed by a habitat split: Warm ocean conditions and old‐forest loss interact to reduce long‐term occupancy of a threatened seabird","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"","keywords":"Occupancy; Threatened species; Habitat; Seabird; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Environmental science; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Predation; Fishery; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.017538647478725078,"score_gpt":0.25801754185179704,"score_spread":0.24047889437307196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081319147","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99979514,0.00001583626,0.00003177116,0.000018307648,8.194315e-7,4.8654414e-7,0.000009566582,0.0000013624259,0.0001267113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998828,0.0000053610247,0.00002753464,0.000011459278,0.0000014699957,7.616033e-7,0.0000130404,7.5688234e-7,0.000056867855],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99979943,0.000077552446,0.000009724208,0.000047815596,0.000022872266,0.000042590982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882716,0.00028072164,0.00044099428,0.000107857726,0.000045472396,0.00029776324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004727334,0.00014344275,0.00019490696,0.00022403924,0.0003125565,0.00077104045,0.0002725246,0.00025053907,0.0017054643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013402923,0.00016591407,0.00021317255,0.00011678073,0.0006114187,0.00030280824,0.00051744335,0.00036656807,0.00009746869],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015552047,0.00006525803,0.99492395,0.000005667604,0.00010944078,0.000086142165,0.00009456734,0.00021002241,0.0025772518,0.00003985029,0.00006339228,0.0016689532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023982711,0.00007227893,0.9989011,0.000001589229,0.000022391352,0.00006242169,0.00021664653,0.0004779351,0.00014150287,0.000033473574,0.00006653962,0.0000017188449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031011635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011402515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031011635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022660088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015322876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0061662197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082929236","doi":"10.1111/conl.12764","title":"Three Key considerations for biodiversity conservation in multilateral agreements","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Environmental Conservation and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"University of Oxford","keywords":"Biodiversity; Biodiversity conservation; Key (lock); Environmental resource management; Nature Conservation; Geography; Business; Environmental planning; Environmental science; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.051368759996402474,"score_gpt":0.22140927750936115,"score_spread":0.17004051751295868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082929236","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026504057,0.007298531,0.16454262,0.37619415,0.0012971695,0.00069930457,0.00011032508,0.00019420095,0.42315963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9348316,0.0022719416,0.03733963,0.01324582,0.0007922554,0.0012551413,0.000048482092,0.000067064604,0.010147959],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9484145,0.0351836,0.0015413212,0.0027856086,0.00775736,0.0043174853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9309716,0.05178032,0.004065261,0.004287914,0.005937533,0.0029574435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.059074506,0.0010047728,0.0012124031,0.0021573992,0.009816841,0.025357662,0.004484349,0.01659279,0.008363051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.090460196,0.00077629037,0.0015242631,0.0026950878,0.03353599,0.028413605,0.013610806,0.014990339,0.0007220326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005156445,0.0000061420515,0.000055760924,0.0000256282,0.0000032280302,0.000030140403,0.00027738998,0.00085583294,0.000023073995,0.99658906,0.00078482594,0.0013436966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012078445,0.000008818653,0.000073921175,0.00012782926,0.000003962729,0.000021027068,0.00064100017,0.0010816476,0.000052625328,0.9897363,0.008228949,0.000011813499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046983366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003367784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059074506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012733703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013369815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3124196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3083614988","doi":"10.1111/conl.12746","title":"How far have we come? A review of MPA network performance indicators in reaching qualitative elements of Aichi Target 11","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Institut Nordique De Recherche En Environnement Et En Santé Au Travail; Fondation de France; Biodiversa+","keywords":"Seascape; Marine protected area; Environmental resource management; Corporate governance; Environmental planning; Biodiversity; Business; Performance indicator; Geography; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.047728265735176405,"score_gpt":0.30282271730840965,"score_spread":0.25509445157323324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3083614988","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00042315922,0.9981489,0.00016914758,0.00040868652,0.000121799785,0.00003289684,0.0000963409,0.0000042010406,0.00059490534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005208353,0.99371755,0.0005254642,0.00024611398,0.000041878076,0.000057435427,0.00009175582,0.0000022622605,0.00010905349],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995906,0.0014865348,0.001216004,0.0002792674,0.0009813324,0.00013074465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9775922,0.015934533,0.0027759315,0.0002543552,0.0032162636,0.00022674701],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008542756,0.0008701485,0.0019208685,0.013996452,0.00055660086,0.002531716,0.0012402725,0.0009549377,0.0025379343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026613286,0.0005529942,0.0016581513,0.015802283,0.0007955237,0.0024412794,0.0011388757,0.00084850716,0.00032298476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008735265,0.000028295823,0.0015532715,0.50367874,0.000979353,0.000119568984,0.00095802674,0.0003245102,0.0003542854,0.003442375,0.01071229,0.47776198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026427333,0.0001620449,0.011628803,0.672461,0.006005127,0.00044067446,0.0016168362,0.0001921384,0.00051693455,0.0018346437,0.30504224,0.000073092946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010663754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027567286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013996452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030908815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010677984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04517895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3084644403","doi":"10.1111/conl.12763","title":"Avian cultural services peak in tropical wet forests","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Animal and Plant Science Education","field":"Psychology","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Government of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; U.S. Forest Service; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of British Columbia; University of British Columbia Graduate School; Killam Trusts; National Geographic Society","keywords":"Geography; Biodiversity; Sociocultural evolution; Wildlife; Habitat; Ecology; Citizen science; Climate change; Environmental resource management; Biology; Environmental science; Political science","score_opus":0.04682812276190838,"score_gpt":0.3026876332130773,"score_spread":0.2558595104511689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3084644403","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99847883,0.00010918286,0.000020033664,0.00011637428,0.0000019142205,0.0000021787262,0.0001387303,0.0000025151446,0.0011302769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99961853,0.00005322585,0.000022070246,0.000029770077,0.000005610397,0.0000014652995,0.00007802918,9.3102454e-7,0.00019026657],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99989295,0.000018785744,0.0000035845048,0.000015182867,0.000012995762,0.00005655777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954635,0.00003521244,0.00016840154,0.000011407813,0.000041300074,0.0001973084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014272198,0.00009944001,0.00010625223,0.00060547004,0.00047929972,0.00059296424,0.00015466851,0.00015738088,0.0032373786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005610379,0.00007931906,0.000083498344,0.0005093198,0.00037631436,0.00024416856,0.0006043628,0.00024740383,0.000194318],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008497666,0.000037595233,0.98670703,0.000028720859,0.000016900893,0.00010925829,0.0020768775,0.00007764126,0.0010821333,0.00016336919,0.000560899,0.009054601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.378947e-7,0.0000077423265,0.9984068,0.0000034637517,0.0000014646879,0.000025069163,0.0011665417,0.000040584302,0.000024302177,0.000024700257,0.00029775183,6.946404e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044302464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13734737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044302464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006846909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037212364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08808917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094077912","doi":"10.1111/conl.12773","title":"Working landscapes need at least 20% native habitat","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":274,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; Sight Research UK","keywords":"Habitat; Biome; Biodiversity; Geography; Food security; Environmental resource management; Protected area; Ecosystem services; Restoration ecology; Agroforestry; Legislation; Habitat destruction; Landscape connectivity; Ecosystem; Agriculture; Environmental planning; Ecology; Environmental science; Political science; Population","score_opus":0.021732366353843655,"score_gpt":0.18429719240902043,"score_spread":0.16256482605517678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094077912","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27211004,0.06490303,0.025474664,0.081085734,0.0034003358,0.00055291445,0.006747861,0.0008446873,0.5448807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88559407,0.031614956,0.021803077,0.026941689,0.0010481788,0.0008531302,0.0064598694,0.00017607854,0.025508888],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979602,0.00048766992,0.00025731654,0.00017072636,0.00078395684,0.00034014144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99118316,0.0022472779,0.0018436916,0.00049948896,0.0032916856,0.00093469926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024950504,0.00023948401,0.000375597,0.0010586325,0.0010706837,0.0026196188,0.0011378229,0.0010236528,0.016127272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068027456,0.0001585845,0.0004093411,0.0010478547,0.0012903676,0.003396672,0.0019022233,0.0008945173,0.0023833106],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018799194,0.00030188562,0.066160664,0.013018008,0.00019238767,0.001630579,0.0061593354,0.0016817527,0.0076966262,0.062099215,0.25825557,0.5826159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026434986,0.00016529446,0.13273932,0.0057734777,0.000096527285,0.001832902,0.00813802,0.00032797747,0.0016948605,0.020207074,0.82894444,0.000053584296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009968472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016677415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016127272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010061566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031772812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053951025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3101029204","doi":"10.1111/conl.12774","title":"Next steps in dismantling discrimination: Lessons from ecology and conservation science","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":107,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Privilege (computing); Environmental ethics; Equity (law); Ecology; Sociology; Process (computing); Field (mathematics); Colonialism; Engineering ethics; Political science; Politics; Law; Engineering; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.03965200305508349,"score_gpt":0.2316632007056852,"score_spread":0.1920111976506017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3101029204","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022427454,0.0352987,0.0032486357,0.9383456,0.0017808867,0.000018163924,0.00001714054,0.0000358177,0.01901231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5173707,0.11925275,0.029879697,0.3081957,0.010188637,0.000285629,0.000106261876,0.00012773699,0.014592976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98834103,0.0077524404,0.00043303435,0.0005960276,0.0015422053,0.0013352314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.939538,0.041882567,0.001445961,0.0025238362,0.0063767526,0.008232935],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039488543,0.00071024045,0.0012090817,0.0036339336,0.00940209,0.015249302,0.0037863443,0.017621461,0.009417405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034076575,0.00040556316,0.0009780066,0.0023460935,0.057612877,0.026911242,0.008719393,0.019427931,0.002002443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010315391,0.00036138517,0.0020936613,0.0009974035,0.000044719283,0.0007626514,0.014580402,0.0011811286,0.00031125758,0.7572063,0.09591767,0.12644021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028796256,0.00005118226,0.0006040313,0.0012064198,0.000008578836,0.00023726301,0.013251649,0.00032281925,0.00015456691,0.83343184,0.15065467,0.00004814699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010297501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018185541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96051145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008430546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023962649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20883787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3106886875","doi":"10.1111/conl.12777","title":"Understanding and responding to the environmental human rights defenders crisis: The case for conservation action","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Human rights; Biodiversity conservation; Biodiversity; Action (physics); Political science; Environmental resource management; Collective action; Face (sociological concept); Environmental planning; Environmental ethics; Business; Sociology; Law; Geography; Ecology; Politics; Economics; Social science","score_opus":0.10322975468393315,"score_gpt":0.24702982817568306,"score_spread":0.1438000734917499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3106886875","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027921784,0.0023382513,0.0009097609,0.9794471,0.00077421794,0.00001350984,0.0000049217592,0.000013705416,0.013706417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52873635,0.007864917,0.0036047983,0.44607526,0.0025164972,0.00022959242,0.000031320073,0.000106646636,0.010834718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97151923,0.018460674,0.0004784767,0.0016351742,0.0023887767,0.0055177184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9521532,0.031747267,0.0022939735,0.0018547528,0.0031015829,0.008849223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04553988,0.00060030434,0.0009172304,0.0017939209,0.019375272,0.025098946,0.0047230134,0.040972993,0.013960016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03898922,0.0005497535,0.0007956184,0.0011762696,0.078064814,0.03530098,0.017349524,0.045059547,0.0013265673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037247723,0.00019152917,0.0013636461,0.00031817053,0.0000250297,0.0013049183,0.08090219,0.0005678078,0.00027820037,0.6940844,0.18761756,0.033309348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029283163,0.00003336749,0.0007902127,0.0016503164,0.000013371363,0.00044510406,0.2046079,0.0008290908,0.00018822784,0.44505423,0.34628394,0.00007497754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014515526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01516817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04553988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016364027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0299281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24084073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112572249","doi":"10.1111/conl.12782","title":"Erasure of Indigenous Peoples risks perpetuating conservation's colonial harms and undermining its future effectiveness","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Biodiversity; Geography; Threatened species; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Environmental resource management; Political science; Environmental planning; Habitat; Ecology; Biology; Economics","score_opus":0.08197891558941746,"score_gpt":0.3618167795416003,"score_spread":0.27983786395218285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112572249","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28267297,0.01984908,0.002486542,0.5057128,0.0049364306,0.00006149568,0.00009688276,0.00010983993,0.18407403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92648506,0.011153347,0.0023122155,0.048151545,0.0016447447,0.000051914714,0.000036373825,0.000054199525,0.01011053],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916182,0.004142906,0.00025384375,0.00059869216,0.002091872,0.0012945483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97783786,0.008982026,0.0025077555,0.0029963308,0.003895238,0.003780797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014856459,0.00026125906,0.00046329552,0.001060222,0.009751738,0.007484136,0.0012304485,0.002591402,0.0063501825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029441739,0.00023348621,0.000429115,0.0011492436,0.020345561,0.006813076,0.0070260926,0.0057581877,0.00046154208],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010779581,0.0001378903,0.05141466,0.0012535452,0.00022778398,0.0013292745,0.3278837,0.000251685,0.0022002691,0.14606099,0.092552245,0.37658024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002143811,0.00021222697,0.049871717,0.0032607403,0.00020679261,0.0011328432,0.30690545,0.00041277014,0.0012487709,0.061360024,0.5752323,0.00013491085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03528645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09471306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03528645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034331162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0133942235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07856941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133095800","doi":"10.1111/conl.12796","title":"An illicit artisanal fishery for North Pacific white sharks indicates frequent occurrence and high mortality in the Gulf of California","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Ichthyology and Marine Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Carcharias; Fishery; Geography; Population; Bycatch; Fisheries management; Marine protected area; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Juvenile; Fishing; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.01720406488121052,"score_gpt":0.23533135043818568,"score_spread":0.21812728555697516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133095800","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978422,0.000067956644,0.00006399118,0.00006560291,0.000011908048,0.0000042355355,0.00029393306,0.000013695418,0.0016364513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990029,0.00007081362,0.00013810316,0.00003449134,0.0000067220953,0.0000028255272,0.00030112485,0.000001729079,0.00044145013],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99989116,0.000007911806,0.000010733992,0.000032087675,0.000038754843,0.00001938292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937445,0.0000569524,0.00022107098,0.000033148015,0.00020200125,0.00011235688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030462258,0.00017870188,0.00009728827,0.0010348127,0.0006035063,0.0003604888,0.0001665392,0.00017824037,0.0018914352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053312135,0.00010372318,0.00009165468,0.00041085112,0.0002733271,0.00020349525,0.00035029248,0.00019816928,0.00019744181],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005724799,0.00002659954,0.99316746,0.000014764647,0.000016893593,0.00019764453,0.00016866461,0.000040371713,0.0010888613,0.000018538067,0.00073487795,0.0044680084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022431016,0.000024816076,0.99878615,0.000008509824,0.000011138411,0.00009780208,0.00049077556,0.00012460796,0.0001298859,0.000014181287,0.0003082339,0.0000016960505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057595856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1653184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057595856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035146673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035843407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.114521205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133654255","doi":"10.1111/conl.12797","title":"Women and Global South strikingly underrepresented among top‐publishing ecologists","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Conferences and Exhibitions Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":188,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Diversity (politics); Promotion (chess); Political science; Equity (law); Scientific publishing; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.04264640571884721,"score_gpt":0.2789726649583074,"score_spread":0.2363262592394602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133654255","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97137433,0.005100621,0.0003177895,0.008035411,0.0003984761,0.000021841406,0.00075046625,0.000030152438,0.013970976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99488467,0.001448274,0.00017044174,0.00088860217,0.00016686255,0.0000141094115,0.00014865215,0.000013997744,0.002264271],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980964,0.00056797103,0.00018292194,0.00029891517,0.00045271628,0.00040114942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803069,0.005485593,0.0064430833,0.000663684,0.002792079,0.0043087145],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034788868,0.0001482795,0.00038554263,0.004014928,0.0020664975,0.0034355205,0.00046678222,0.0004832181,0.007929261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013096627,0.00014375523,0.00016679999,0.0049847313,0.0011572024,0.0020039359,0.002118001,0.00055812154,0.0007280237],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021145926,0.000049616312,0.8548464,0.00058349094,0.00009059664,0.0011463279,0.06557227,0.00005538548,0.002050828,0.004325033,0.0121679455,0.058900554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019389516,0.00009765838,0.79583275,0.00061143376,0.00006304735,0.0016077358,0.122338146,0.00017917473,0.0011093285,0.0032596772,0.07483132,0.000050328326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028094773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00646885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9965211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007008183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001559299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026526034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159622888","doi":"10.1111/conl.12802","title":"Research biases create overrepresented “poster children” of marine invasion ecology","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Marine Ecology and Invasive Species","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Marine biodiversity; Phylum; Invasive species; Biodiversity; Ecology; Introduced species; Marine protected area; Marine species; Biology; Marine reserve; Geography; Habitat","score_opus":0.050783228002981566,"score_gpt":0.2873659476073043,"score_spread":0.2365827196043227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159622888","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17381944,0.7532012,0.008416375,0.024059111,0.0030623288,0.0011816716,0.0064382106,0.00012658307,0.029695079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77680117,0.19203372,0.012163265,0.01265371,0.001222824,0.0014542555,0.001955785,0.00011101278,0.001604315],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.906218,0.04936277,0.025589872,0.004906022,0.01294014,0.0009832339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4567429,0.45105183,0.061849877,0.008141258,0.020432882,0.0017812965],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07118709,0.0005521023,0.00151449,0.012389904,0.0009122073,0.004093163,0.0015042768,0.0013877361,0.0050199544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2871216,0.00061049574,0.0019568503,0.009979098,0.0038729303,0.006030903,0.0034082702,0.0009855311,0.00054381037],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00091290596,0.0000921395,0.14835423,0.4360589,0.009091896,0.0014735181,0.03546028,0.0003558542,0.0019894259,0.015706802,0.020935046,0.32956898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029238613,0.00043507095,0.22299175,0.5124583,0.015682938,0.0033029667,0.041453946,0.00045735622,0.002525533,0.019714894,0.18044579,0.00023905364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026600815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008888049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9288129,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021538034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064859246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37647778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159974855","doi":"10.1111/conl.12805","title":"Enabling transformative economic change in the post‐2020 biodiversity agenda","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Environmental Conservation and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Convention on Biological Diversity; Sustainability; Biodiversity; Transformative learning; Ecosystem services; Negotiation; Incentive; Environmental resource management; Sustainable development; Business; Environmental planning; Work (physics); Political science; Ecology; Ecosystem; Economics; Geography; Sociology","score_opus":0.030930994678434746,"score_gpt":0.22167741490178644,"score_spread":0.1907464202233517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159974855","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00864941,0.0040110718,0.008194006,0.66473794,0.004646858,0.000117159274,0.0001549443,0.00014629177,0.3093423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.607235,0.009746286,0.022053279,0.29680052,0.005362771,0.0006145466,0.00053078926,0.00021581557,0.057440907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98542285,0.00610883,0.00046224144,0.0006128019,0.0031527916,0.0042404677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833363,0.007466971,0.0011878975,0.0008146535,0.002894758,0.0042993943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026056426,0.00065272383,0.00037049272,0.0021237766,0.0062250346,0.019433845,0.0023769317,0.017341845,0.017160779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022294478,0.0003916688,0.000647572,0.0015715199,0.013023745,0.015027214,0.016685665,0.010744221,0.0022601923],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024275905,0.00010081504,0.00034762107,0.00014804571,0.0000069388784,0.0002052974,0.0019761052,0.0006255783,0.00037059162,0.90502,0.07083971,0.020335041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014045505,0.000030603805,0.0009127739,0.00040981252,0.00000458527,0.00007138449,0.0038262787,0.00039396065,0.00035631028,0.3332976,0.6606497,0.000032953612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005217544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075243493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026056426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011397952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030924417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13780117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172957077","doi":"10.1111/conl.12819","title":"Belt and Road Initiative in Central Asia: Anticipating socioecological challenges from large‐scale infrastructure in a global biodiversity hotspot","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Library and Archives Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Livelihood; Business; Environmental planning; Ecosystem services; Biodiversity hotspot; Environmental resource management; Harm; China; Biodiversity; Stakeholder; Natural resource economics; Geography; Ecosystem; Ecology; Political science; Agriculture; Environmental science; Economics","score_opus":0.01859407040226534,"score_gpt":0.2354287330374091,"score_spread":0.21683466263514375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3172957077","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83834004,0.018108547,0.0032136347,0.07118964,0.0005735623,0.00016735589,0.0005106669,0.000086511835,0.06781011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867194,0.0059278044,0.0013550497,0.0025630116,0.00006493961,0.00006178925,0.00014963905,0.000009229768,0.0031491127],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994974,0.00014487034,0.000015997004,0.00003465045,0.000054511038,0.0002525035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984341,0.0003454064,0.0002819863,0.000043696702,0.0003037231,0.00059106835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018766705,0.0002830553,0.00017614049,0.0012055207,0.002143392,0.0035552871,0.0007668962,0.0010039213,0.0036552674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011860937,0.00012787826,0.00020085952,0.0013784047,0.0012969082,0.0029011723,0.0033447202,0.0011741392,0.00015021134],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020092091,0.00046765414,0.44114468,0.004365779,0.00024275742,0.01803824,0.09797666,0.0050280793,0.0064024455,0.09088216,0.07140481,0.2638457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000223628,0.00037872227,0.30504087,0.0026350848,0.0001770585,0.0014161188,0.39383823,0.0042056944,0.0021155619,0.023449557,0.2666038,0.00011690481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03955124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.122848965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03955124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032120065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008784654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07864201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175962666","doi":"10.1111/conl.12824","title":"Multispecies tracking reveals a major seabird hotspot in the North Atlantic","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; Birds Canada; Acadia University; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; Sight Research UK","keywords":"Seabird; Hotspot (geology); Geography; Environmental science; Oceanography; Fishery; Ecology; Biology; Geology","score_opus":0.0199183865255639,"score_gpt":0.22152647202319725,"score_spread":0.20160808549763334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175962666","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99873906,0.000051976418,0.00025672017,0.000028811008,0.0000027630897,0.000003594906,0.00030520512,0.000007615556,0.00060424657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990264,0.000039761,0.00037761402,0.000023120854,0.000002478518,0.000003830294,0.00026553214,0.0000018581699,0.00025936303],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998907,0.000016612827,0.000006704345,0.000035209458,0.000023059478,0.000027789585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960417,0.0000388395,0.00017263324,0.000035448447,0.00007258789,0.00007634058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022024759,0.00007683283,0.00012153065,0.000794479,0.00036632284,0.0004614611,0.00018193311,0.00016655237,0.00092846534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027202207,0.00008379172,0.00010777965,0.00058828684,0.00017200316,0.00017552686,0.00038280827,0.00012499926,0.00014365137],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025342664,0.000009963866,0.9878549,0.000008705006,0.00001824502,0.000046597448,0.0002858755,0.000067505265,0.006113523,0.000022407114,0.00016921063,0.0053776647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.209434e-7,0.0000071949503,0.9993018,0.0000030930282,0.0000032251726,0.000032131702,0.00022070754,0.00013868889,0.00011231572,0.000008960916,0.00017047282,9.643653e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050325144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1798684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050325144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003650791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028304046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10006446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3183595417","doi":"10.1111/conl.12822","title":"Toward monitoring forest ecosystem integrity within the post‐2020 Global Biodiversity Framework","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Convention on Biological Diversity; Operationalization; Biodiversity; Environmental resource management; Ecosystem; Ecosystem services; Schema (genetic algorithms); Forest ecology; Environmental science; Ecology; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.023751631607904226,"score_gpt":0.2137289428454474,"score_spread":0.1899773112375432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3183595417","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6184272,0.0026111237,0.26104742,0.012153462,0.0002533366,0.0010569618,0.007939254,0.00095841155,0.09555294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8926586,0.00042145274,0.10256379,0.00047174146,0.000030613843,0.00030946702,0.002526294,0.000042150758,0.00097596145],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921858,0.0036678745,0.00067101256,0.0005824156,0.002359191,0.0005337675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97624254,0.0025697364,0.005860128,0.0018892736,0.01242134,0.001016973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019728974,0.0006893576,0.0004733961,0.005143285,0.00086254126,0.0052512814,0.00120196,0.0011359942,0.0006270796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016763752,0.00020017181,0.00041364206,0.004599368,0.0014537756,0.004936554,0.003069348,0.0013160063,0.00021373424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027467083,0.0004948882,0.6589669,0.00038986997,0.0002648111,0.00016846124,0.0020078558,0.047173798,0.0055146865,0.064088464,0.018498562,0.20215693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005776195,0.0009058616,0.5759754,0.0014196842,0.00018776923,0.00027523513,0.014740373,0.19077207,0.024690147,0.09731055,0.09337433,0.0002908263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02158292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028924594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02158292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037297085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003727976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10433805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3183901730","doi":"10.1111/conl.12827","title":"Decadal changes in international advocacy toward the conservation of highly migratory fishes","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Tuna; Fisheries management; Fishery; Business; Pelagic zone; Stock (firearms); Environmental resource management; Marine protected area; Political science; Environmental planning; Geography; Economics; Ecology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.02414838359248676,"score_gpt":0.2457512667278971,"score_spread":0.22160288313541035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3183901730","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96593195,0.001261714,0.0004948073,0.011190471,0.00038793634,0.000013408045,0.0007250571,0.000020816633,0.019973857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967699,0.00044428543,0.00020515523,0.00066198275,0.00010189089,0.00001040747,0.000247296,0.0000064552955,0.0015526395],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928504,0.0002276472,0.00006494253,0.000103630904,0.00014249439,0.00017633422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99229217,0.0017138426,0.0037297674,0.00026602639,0.001180334,0.00081779],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025904593,0.00008768392,0.00008251816,0.0013123131,0.00050331926,0.0014833424,0.00025496873,0.0006757611,0.0048994715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063067037,0.000083122104,0.00014325726,0.0015506344,0.00063994667,0.001001699,0.0013389271,0.001249676,0.00036080476],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020523118,0.00008241828,0.89780205,0.00033354858,0.000103834645,0.0005987938,0.026895344,0.00033308528,0.002560465,0.0068042898,0.013452889,0.050828107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035407288,0.000048919293,0.9391704,0.00016282221,0.000023257979,0.00017482688,0.027547695,0.00021001748,0.00040120073,0.00043440916,0.03180591,0.000017062765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004616381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00982017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0048994715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007901674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046889985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016390383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185181394","doi":"10.1111/conl.12829","title":"For the sake of resilience and multifunctionality, let's diversify planted forests!","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":400,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Alberta; Université de Sherbrooke; Université du Québec en Outaouais; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Afforestation; Ecosystem services; Agroforestry; Psychological resilience; Resilience (materials science); Diversity (politics); Geography; Business; Forest ecology; Ecosystem; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Biology; Environmental science","score_opus":0.01937218794836123,"score_gpt":0.23443069224317076,"score_spread":0.21505850429480952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3185181394","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05770419,0.013905198,0.016960872,0.76812685,0.0057121133,0.000058879377,0.00040895908,0.00029169582,0.13683122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.803485,0.011794743,0.019110091,0.11520096,0.0022195552,0.000079475736,0.00026268707,0.00014915776,0.047698326],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993274,0.00024121863,0.000020685944,0.000097244905,0.0001703241,0.00014309173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970686,0.00074013305,0.00030244925,0.00038165099,0.0006280949,0.0008791473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002001158,0.00022080292,0.00017581497,0.00035102206,0.0015003091,0.0032523647,0.00058324373,0.0018907494,0.014710537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039370246,0.00008832001,0.00018066443,0.00043934866,0.0035359669,0.004883234,0.0019809157,0.0025225542,0.0019580054],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015217312,0.0002861088,0.019356607,0.00056571263,0.000060200124,0.00054224365,0.0029613955,0.0015618897,0.007282372,0.28703648,0.37809524,0.3020996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021188103,0.00012480989,0.017132724,0.00084768876,0.000027311557,0.0005520199,0.0065768994,0.00090499275,0.0021621916,0.13712476,0.8344786,0.000046866815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036096948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012373856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014710537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00093777553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016978339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04921168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186480101","doi":"10.1111/conl.12830","title":"Biodiversity protection in the 21st century needs intact habitat and protection from overexploitation whether inside or outside parks","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Overexploitation; Marine protected area; Biodiversity; Habitat; Fishing; Marine conservation; Marine reserve; Geography; Habitat destruction; Fishery; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.028092231926235854,"score_gpt":0.2025264509403583,"score_spread":0.17443421901412243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186480101","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0460797,0.07432585,0.016910559,0.34974325,0.008050127,0.00017870915,0.0015538734,0.00061595737,0.50254196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57569724,0.1210044,0.026734397,0.14625213,0.0057439934,0.000371038,0.0018422229,0.0005832256,0.1217714],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979752,0.00041870953,0.00008077632,0.00022333261,0.0007624511,0.00053949916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963982,0.00052024826,0.00039982502,0.000317887,0.00078140106,0.0015823584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021057124,0.00047647796,0.00062370894,0.0008700781,0.0034766905,0.0068157027,0.0009860698,0.0031567868,0.027193945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038178114,0.00024640147,0.0003964323,0.0013173969,0.005099482,0.0081449,0.007715105,0.0049943305,0.005578277],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008872215,0.0002236641,0.008268859,0.0028577887,0.00009718783,0.0004814302,0.0070065255,0.00083515944,0.0030874673,0.23672168,0.28062338,0.4597081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006924588,0.00008738873,0.0074180933,0.0012294885,0.000015516533,0.00032785424,0.0037685155,0.00011020948,0.00029714307,0.04489885,0.94180834,0.00003163779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004807067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014347094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027193945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024928048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047891494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09097278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194565929","doi":"10.1111/conl.12834","title":"A conservation roadmap for the subterranean biome","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Museum of Nature; Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Biome; Convention on Biological Diversity; Biodiversity; Biodiversity conservation; Ecosystem services; Geography; Environmental resource management; Biodiversity hotspot; Protected area; Environmental planning; Conservation biology; Ecosystem; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.031448469445273894,"score_gpt":0.219414590393506,"score_spread":0.18796612094823212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3194565929","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028820243,0.06025011,0.10505084,0.43632236,0.009285998,0.0020879572,0.008128607,0.002280136,0.3477737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40654126,0.047043476,0.39651024,0.028736614,0.001778692,0.0055927522,0.01879992,0.00035654457,0.09464047],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822694,0.00055798155,0.00013053171,0.00016258837,0.0004951598,0.00042683774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99418133,0.0008565618,0.0004565126,0.00031940656,0.002853034,0.0013331855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042207777,0.0009788134,0.00042312738,0.0043498185,0.0027181634,0.005209447,0.0020075878,0.0036936095,0.026813444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006107453,0.00028352335,0.0004987027,0.0028940248,0.0018667883,0.0053392863,0.005738264,0.0036318847,0.0030246743],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009125842,0.00027598636,0.004543384,0.0014620995,0.000028766444,0.00041828217,0.00134413,0.0051527536,0.0015461136,0.23381929,0.3153423,0.43597567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001988773,0.00010534353,0.0053139077,0.0013738201,0.000017736316,0.00025605914,0.0029585846,0.0043734196,0.0003600655,0.113569304,0.87160474,0.00004721302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024771541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027792806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026813444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039134477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02146009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.089699924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199748158","doi":"10.1111/conl.12839","title":"Quantifying the road‐effect zone for a critically endangered primate","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Critically endangered; Endangered species; Wildlife; Abundance (ecology); Geography; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.028625000731705166,"score_gpt":0.2824114255384238,"score_spread":0.25378642480671865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199748158","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9816357,0.0005168716,0.013993289,0.000079655394,0.000009351243,0.00002450396,0.00080790615,0.00006929522,0.0028634416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998256,0.000032270513,0.0014925243,0.000008845342,0.0000017058015,0.0000074082723,0.00014199718,0.0000033836548,0.000055981913],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876803,0.0005114966,0.00008940167,0.000291992,0.0002400418,0.00009904095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940269,0.00318844,0.0018231664,0.0003056814,0.0004973388,0.00015842504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017033613,0.0002803959,0.00026804418,0.0033207545,0.00042954326,0.0010560916,0.00046395845,0.0004871647,0.0015206322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007006817,0.000113163675,0.0003547215,0.0015594414,0.0006909957,0.00083356735,0.001277473,0.0003708671,0.0002175722],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017161503,0.000039290248,0.9574033,0.00015790584,0.00032535146,0.00018940735,0.00058121816,0.014970929,0.006264386,0.0024710752,0.0005021931,0.016923249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007507297,0.00018282757,0.9628294,0.00008125003,0.00016100661,0.0007740192,0.0020171078,0.022855354,0.0028926241,0.004574684,0.0035784263,0.000045807392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005745513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008112264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005745513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043921862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022957937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011424124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200107460","doi":"10.1111/conl.12850","title":"Toward a new framework for restoring lost wildlife migrations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Geographic Society","keywords":"Wildlife; Restoration ecology; Ecology; Habitat; Underpinning; Adaptation (eye); Wildlife conservation; Geography; Wildlife management; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Biology","score_opus":0.04096810091602779,"score_gpt":0.25457287638670734,"score_spread":0.21360477547067955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200107460","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012964495,0.0346184,0.23009248,0.5585373,0.006711427,0.0004028131,0.00019463821,0.0005023248,0.15597615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6830826,0.03315131,0.21917546,0.036714207,0.005064898,0.0014441045,0.00021792967,0.00033002568,0.020819379],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98911965,0.0075554065,0.0004545617,0.0012111446,0.00089735206,0.00076192006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98968506,0.0040405104,0.0010748723,0.0007558749,0.0024877756,0.0019560016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0275761,0.0020378258,0.0012705505,0.0067310533,0.009576244,0.018853156,0.008328616,0.009341758,0.0074520684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011193769,0.00052953244,0.0012697562,0.0021037522,0.058809455,0.016346153,0.009441849,0.011453254,0.00094745564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014511536,0.000048268794,0.00051297504,0.0003264439,0.000017168082,0.00016465168,0.0074531273,0.001987946,0.00012284386,0.9655902,0.008567994,0.015194051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017150316,0.000080641556,0.00073972275,0.0019534773,0.000033837012,0.0002003799,0.020804923,0.003060925,0.00018291245,0.7835237,0.18934369,0.000058845162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013405022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023155682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0275761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01371154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021702765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14583814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205349295","doi":"10.1111/conl.12866","title":"Vector control reduces the rate of species invasion in the world's largest freshwater ecosystem","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Marine Ecology and Invasive Species","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ballast; Species richness; Invasive species; Environmental science; Fishery; Introduced species; Flushing; Oceanography; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.013847780086758263,"score_gpt":0.19594620161383552,"score_spread":0.18209842152707725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205349295","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99588335,0.00022513786,0.00047943395,0.0001775264,0.000009826951,0.000027898992,0.00004815115,0.00004645867,0.003102288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989047,0.00007196918,0.0002659552,0.00004173444,0.0000028298227,0.0000062918184,0.00005037765,0.0000022090405,0.000653849],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99976283,0.00006570148,0.00001209237,0.000047757065,0.0000529947,0.000058668404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993563,0.00010937973,0.00026686577,0.00005206382,0.000082014034,0.00013344224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043835508,0.00017531744,0.00013273983,0.00042441243,0.00018934622,0.00054080173,0.00025087397,0.00019461077,0.0023283008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012183582,0.00006142871,0.00014733437,0.00019051539,0.00027260362,0.0003005771,0.00046888288,0.00023391447,0.0001388159],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011877065,0.00274928,0.57845545,0.00041541838,0.00035126987,0.00043473777,0.0010201054,0.008085008,0.11752797,0.0036002004,0.006056367,0.2801166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050685285,0.002328085,0.96897686,0.00004998245,0.00009245581,0.00018052457,0.00096723903,0.0092009725,0.011337164,0.0007195222,0.006076257,0.000020197394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010744353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019066263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010744353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004952628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050201314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021363676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206259381","doi":"10.1111/conl.12860","title":"Using nonhuman culture in conservation requires careful and concerted action","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Endangered species; Set (abstract data type); Environmental resource management; Environmental ethics; Conservation science; Environmental planning; Nature Conservation; Business; Engineering ethics; Political science; Computer science; Ecology; Biodiversity; Biology; Geography; Engineering; Habitat; Environmental science","score_opus":0.05037500472477887,"score_gpt":0.2737742254707777,"score_spread":0.2233992207459988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206259381","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006058604,0.01380832,0.020237563,0.9305905,0.004984346,0.00019122464,0.000018522172,0.000117073905,0.023993844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5238751,0.027848285,0.071048506,0.354794,0.0057718405,0.0013413241,0.00004950271,0.0002790413,0.014992383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9248342,0.057479892,0.0028278027,0.0025431311,0.008514999,0.0038000385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8269084,0.11588795,0.0060111657,0.017092684,0.020835398,0.0132642975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10747314,0.00095600507,0.0019977754,0.001163582,0.010359433,0.023643536,0.0039132806,0.012007203,0.004940064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0644231,0.0005534827,0.0011299116,0.0009546216,0.07197465,0.027612105,0.014417092,0.030540783,0.0012428606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012279424,0.00043711605,0.0067304596,0.0022065886,0.00027103414,0.00077542913,0.05201933,0.0013452704,0.0035865295,0.58170426,0.12667236,0.22412877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052455256,0.0002665983,0.004878643,0.006968608,0.00010728256,0.0007150323,0.0814439,0.0009073492,0.001829533,0.45040092,0.45214567,0.00028408336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011438218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012478888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10747314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074692355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035998244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5683791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206763667","doi":"10.1111/conl.12858","title":"A global map of human pressures on tropical coral reefs","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":101,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Bloomberg Philanthropies","keywords":"Coral reef; Reef; Resilience of coral reefs; Environmental science; Coral; Aquaculture of coral; Fishing; Fishery; Population; Coral reef protection; Oceanography; Geography; Geology; Biology","score_opus":0.017164646437254818,"score_gpt":0.23946562393203472,"score_spread":0.2223009774947799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206763667","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9518031,0.00048555026,0.0018140228,0.00036942467,0.00001265755,0.0000342488,0.034486707,0.00023594289,0.010758251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98413795,0.00038845677,0.0030383128,0.00003278415,0.000013776112,0.000034077642,0.011751272,0.00001915813,0.0005842195],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998745,0.000018678375,0.000010711142,0.000031765107,0.000038721206,0.000025606461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994517,0.00008260291,0.00014958227,0.000058475558,0.00017810371,0.00007958237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002254402,0.00025175262,0.00014769334,0.0033341188,0.00022257207,0.00076371466,0.00014680093,0.00015540057,0.0027366623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009570887,0.00009798142,0.0003129522,0.0051572714,0.0001756809,0.0003823989,0.0008523705,0.00018215354,0.00032816414],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009071343,0.000039706636,0.91612923,0.00024469654,0.00018023427,0.00015900946,0.0006800565,0.017291827,0.0039734594,0.0012430556,0.006829485,0.053138446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061397727,0.00001465228,0.9885393,0.000027344135,0.000018429502,0.000050971208,0.0004965877,0.005057098,0.00017567727,0.0002247911,0.0053798603,0.0000092072705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04082027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04601582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04082027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040953193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005655586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08116531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210458477","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-263x.2010.00157.x","title":"Cover Caption","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fishery; Wildlife; Oncorhynchus; Shore; Cover (algebra); Tourism; Wildlife conservation; Geography; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.006915074636626578,"score_gpt":0.19257325008081932,"score_spread":0.18565817544419275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210458477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024010162,0.0023817122,0.00072488165,0.002818258,0.0073636146,0.0005262154,0.15632132,0.0017611348,0.82570183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007022039,0.0014712728,0.00033731494,0.0007313449,0.00059523445,0.000190342,0.04870068,0.0005146137,0.94043726],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99983084,0.000008686849,0.000007675663,0.00003301553,0.00007175842,0.00004804437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989272,0.00006480348,0.00003597396,0.000040890613,0.0007736742,0.00015748288],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019269215,0.00093506504,0.00063560065,0.0020261845,0.0023832743,0.0010984626,0.0013159823,0.00066473515,0.7685448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00094529835,0.0002753954,0.00021146011,0.0029846758,0.0003783083,0.00065485295,0.0009288821,0.00069214153,0.459829],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008749647,0.0000037393863,0.00013877689,0.00004180849,4.2101368e-7,0.000016645548,0.000014821527,0.000015500109,0.000058846625,0.00006791924,0.98963684,0.009995915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005163357,0.000005968353,0.004458436,0.00008290456,0.0000014385844,0.000044196706,0.00010891593,0.000049952974,0.000048404632,0.000074664604,0.9951139,0.0000060083185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4697555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6389232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4697555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002490816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026377349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93404245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210622999","doi":"10.1111/conl.12865","title":"Global camera trap synthesis highlights the importance of protected areas in maintaining mammal diversity","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of British Columbia","funders":"Norges Forskningsråd; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Mammal; Biodiversity; Diversity (politics); Habitat; Ecology; Functional diversity; Geography; Nearctic ecozone; Biology; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Political science","score_opus":0.012272238515951625,"score_gpt":0.19846409351457087,"score_spread":0.18619185499861923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210622999","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9383434,0.011755399,0.005667829,0.0015964429,0.00019735962,0.000037726888,0.03093303,0.00012439898,0.01134443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891322,0.0012433127,0.001120796,0.00013830629,0.00008020463,0.000011371704,0.007830745,0.000032303098,0.00041068706],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905604,0.00032580504,0.00008697497,0.00027950358,0.00015705517,0.00009458104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933436,0.0027030485,0.0019028981,0.0008689532,0.0009866044,0.00019474851],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021860746,0.0003244804,0.00036965797,0.0020974493,0.00022036902,0.0013518783,0.00042489613,0.00021668967,0.0049129017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006136059,0.00012248407,0.00043567107,0.0028847244,0.0004938725,0.0007973676,0.00097148906,0.00029486322,0.00039709744],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001533851,0.000013795158,0.92311275,0.0013513269,0.0010808952,0.00021450079,0.00089732703,0.0017880735,0.0014218725,0.0015343063,0.009433549,0.058998186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036265183,0.000025211995,0.9860839,0.00019408522,0.00016934452,0.0001633154,0.0008954951,0.0011920559,0.0002343098,0.0003056719,0.010719396,0.000013460214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015075085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025362957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015075085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037939506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032784144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029974699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232005461","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-263x.2013.00277.x","title":"Cover Caption","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Pharmacological Effects of Medicinal Plants","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Universidade Federal de Goiás; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; University of Waterloo; Arizona State University; Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University; South African National Parks; Victoria University; Western Washington University; Michigan State University; National University of Singapore; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; University of Central Florida; College of Engineering, Michigan State University; Helsingin Yliopisto; World Wildlife Fund","keywords":"Geography; Cover (algebra); Engineering","score_opus":0.020901801717617838,"score_gpt":0.27260829838807193,"score_spread":0.2517064966704541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232005461","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026587057,0.002625648,0.0024228669,0.005650927,0.039849248,0.0010654912,0.064219184,0.0028130056,0.87869483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009196189,0.0018710918,0.0017127157,0.0030741994,0.006851922,0.0009219755,0.03309015,0.0015286438,0.94175315],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997836,0.000029722309,0.000018093579,0.000059814054,0.000076653785,0.000032113123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986387,0.0003200712,0.000089453715,0.00012213716,0.0006197403,0.00020990382],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032621148,0.0009457529,0.00068446907,0.0014347989,0.0016780795,0.0013153402,0.0011740822,0.001329767,0.8217328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025433928,0.0002882847,0.00032814383,0.001163587,0.00039289633,0.0014837204,0.0016307699,0.0012632175,0.5830574],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029653358,0.000010205433,0.00005845854,0.00008343643,7.2970874e-7,0.00006169478,0.00001976883,0.000019245454,0.0002435431,0.0002733337,0.9829585,0.016241381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050332205,0.000014263668,0.00062222854,0.000058800364,0.0000011457195,0.00014888236,0.00005247118,0.00004529821,0.00011822161,0.00022188782,0.9987078,0.0000040516065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019617875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029731789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17826718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004960773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004335856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2542765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233152893","doi":"10.1111/conl.12705","title":"Subsidizing extinction?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Western Forest Products; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Subsidy; Incentive; Harm; Natural resource economics; Accountability; Biodiversity; Government (linguistics); Public economics; Business; Action (physics); Work (physics); Economics; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Political science; Ecology; Geography","score_opus":0.16240333560037168,"score_gpt":0.2008509138346565,"score_spread":0.038447578234284824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233152893","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07405933,0.009206944,0.02739951,0.21044043,0.0028865861,0.000094123185,0.0004536844,0.00027315968,0.67518634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92939484,0.003126347,0.0018163315,0.019412648,0.0011851228,0.00007593988,0.000093866925,0.00006277585,0.04483221],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888724,0.0004276879,0.00003599517,0.0001722883,0.00023540754,0.00024141333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978423,0.0011102238,0.00025785033,0.00018683508,0.0003638937,0.0002388003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022411963,0.00021763447,0.00039179894,0.00058066286,0.0009307514,0.0023135957,0.000602473,0.002409644,0.023717554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009554208,0.00011279749,0.00033027423,0.00033311837,0.0031128621,0.0031092758,0.001953997,0.0033601343,0.000997947],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049787985,0.000045553414,0.0012815363,0.00009224632,0.0000154141,0.000087655564,0.00014246232,0.0018745868,0.00021450694,0.9357105,0.030431751,0.030054111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006590855,0.000056040946,0.0025384738,0.00028656397,0.000026274029,0.0001630058,0.00028478386,0.0049885646,0.0006039523,0.82176274,0.16920766,0.000016098254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00275829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020182915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023717554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021229459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001805762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07934314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238654569","doi":"10.1111/conl.12136","title":"Cover Caption","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Geography; Engineering","score_opus":0.04511951797308531,"score_gpt":0.3059057221103293,"score_spread":0.26078620413724396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238654569","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00074784853,0.00069772126,0.0013736977,0.003076759,0.011323769,0.0006469103,0.15549062,0.0026244905,0.82401824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0042534014,0.0010469225,0.0013332322,0.001907638,0.0024357284,0.0008161555,0.10818165,0.0027802237,0.877245],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995552,0.000037143833,0.00002670743,0.00008209657,0.00021847241,0.00008040662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968304,0.0004329137,0.00012251087,0.00023797213,0.0020298357,0.00034629993],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042511878,0.0009630825,0.000746868,0.0030651095,0.00270904,0.0030704893,0.001412025,0.001514278,0.884389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042796447,0.00047830955,0.00042098638,0.004567757,0.00046706863,0.0031035654,0.0020490042,0.0018635988,0.7313128],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070239157,0.000003881961,0.00002932138,0.0000415052,2.4702265e-7,0.00001031262,0.000012081835,0.0000148107265,0.00004766807,0.0002845857,0.99426717,0.005281383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005514591,0.00000560696,0.0004824036,0.000056726283,8.727614e-7,0.000033776294,0.00006798136,0.000049368668,0.000052859283,0.00041075182,0.99882895,0.000005158717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0102323685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014466401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11561102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011918742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011831862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16490507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281742795","doi":"10.1111/conl.12886","title":"Safeguarding human–wildlife cooperation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of Manitoba","funders":"Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Templeton World Charity Foundation; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior","keywords":"Safeguarding; Wildlife; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Business; Biodiversity; Wildlife conservation; Environmental ethics; Geography; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.08629509143766416,"score_gpt":0.3072723739423952,"score_spread":0.22097728250473103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281742795","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009033005,0.74676466,0.006687363,0.06567639,0.0034687428,0.00013846194,0.00023446314,0.00009092756,0.16790603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12933712,0.8255781,0.0068272804,0.015742956,0.0012962086,0.0002521957,0.0003177341,0.00003407081,0.020614235],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977489,0.0011350046,0.00013830404,0.00017586983,0.00047379686,0.0003281191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965109,0.0019550137,0.0004776956,0.00021978868,0.0006469857,0.00018969894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038877826,0.00041830493,0.0004176079,0.0021210255,0.0013355903,0.0036634947,0.001069648,0.0021688496,0.006264465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041002175,0.00014795327,0.00033502674,0.0025904062,0.0036674037,0.004540955,0.0031291011,0.0013082718,0.0010979379],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039787268,0.00006805511,0.0025357308,0.012644542,0.00006875476,0.0005725147,0.0059645227,0.0004262447,0.0011635743,0.2016606,0.07471481,0.7001409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035526564,0.000023665825,0.0030538987,0.007513479,0.00002033508,0.00022041303,0.0036555664,0.000042284682,0.00033642646,0.019980464,0.9651401,0.0000098080955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009536177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016834406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009536177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002597462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009669171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020956755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4288767099","doi":"10.1111/conl.12881","title":"The disproportionately high value of small patches for biodiversity conservation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":174,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Espace pour la vie","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Biodiversity; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Habitat; Extinction debt; Geography; Ecology; Habitat destruction; Conservation biology; Biology","score_opus":0.016261278311919716,"score_gpt":0.20313554938112996,"score_spread":0.18687427106921023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4288767099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97126514,0.0028297561,0.009567296,0.002754535,0.000109710185,0.000027474198,0.0030581306,0.000097515,0.010290389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976769,0.0001659277,0.0011631303,0.00016627842,0.000030723935,0.000008700691,0.0005058075,0.000020761416,0.0002618128],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967624,0.0013837875,0.00016895548,0.0009578289,0.0004850968,0.00024179007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98172945,0.010989259,0.0026745684,0.0029980396,0.00089171494,0.00071711745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003205031,0.00022005994,0.0006584156,0.0015955284,0.0011180477,0.0026820314,0.00081423786,0.0005242075,0.006384545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016067171,0.00017901995,0.0005300872,0.0023403084,0.002013057,0.0027592382,0.0023042995,0.0009133544,0.00047614696],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043053293,0.000054666063,0.90375453,0.00067778316,0.0011182334,0.0003662007,0.0007302139,0.0050954763,0.003940721,0.009936218,0.0072802845,0.06661519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027987415,0.00006223585,0.95409256,0.00021463864,0.00023580638,0.00075582316,0.0014453863,0.0052995835,0.0012398158,0.0207255,0.015866103,0.00003451752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004301924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008143706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006384545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072067935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002951456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02135843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289754922","doi":"10.1111/conl.12914","title":"Woody plant phylogenetic diversity supports nature's contributions to people but is at risk from human population growth","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Phylogenetic tree; Ecology; Phylogenetic diversity; Species richness; Diversity (politics); Ecosystem; Biology; Population; Woody plant; Phylogenetics; Geography; Agroforestry; Demography","score_opus":0.005588432557697235,"score_gpt":0.21194081130276152,"score_spread":0.2063523787450643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289754922","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99524057,0.00020128081,0.0005352432,0.0007930758,0.00000575366,0.0000019558524,0.000050000894,0.0000029721145,0.0031691885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99977463,0.0000452794,0.00007900551,0.000019949013,0.000004734873,4.0258814e-7,0.0000064143032,5.405309e-7,0.00006898328],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959797,0.00023027428,0.000009903741,0.0000510236,0.0000498891,0.000060908755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976453,0.0009952395,0.00071755477,0.0001870335,0.00019137247,0.00026359627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007684855,0.00012881744,0.00016397018,0.0005233378,0.00047510737,0.000666285,0.00020064265,0.00025837147,0.0040162858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039688037,0.00008544634,0.000105573235,0.0005387384,0.0012451108,0.00065743807,0.00055779476,0.00030721747,0.00014027183],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071823844,0.00003359664,0.9740035,0.000033673492,0.00008840332,0.0001518427,0.0014205906,0.0003809993,0.0011500329,0.002950256,0.0002538312,0.019461457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029134617,0.000038041293,0.99079543,0.000044545835,0.000037154965,0.00015361476,0.00302375,0.00093414116,0.00023766446,0.0036393937,0.001087433,0.0000059705717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052706855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008345997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052706855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023157422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026455623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013435781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4295113314","doi":"10.1111/conl.12920","title":"Using ecosystem services to identify inequitable outcomes in migratory species conservation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; Kelowna General Hospital","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Ecosystem services; Subsidy; Geography; Context (archaeology); Indigenous; Biodiversity; Equity (law); Environmental resource management; Ecosystem; Ecology; Environmental planning; Biology; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.029545419134461775,"score_gpt":0.26255164178724494,"score_spread":0.23300622265278317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4295113314","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9813219,0.0003231995,0.006699932,0.0012220284,0.00002530676,0.000039919578,0.00072996016,0.00002107634,0.009616853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99854857,0.000035831676,0.001185133,0.000029679422,0.0000040994314,0.000018037617,0.00008194103,0.0000015124924,0.000095204035],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847275,0.0007887168,0.00010380164,0.0001384709,0.0002919399,0.00020424568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99438214,0.0020108297,0.0019318917,0.0003528385,0.00080840604,0.00051387347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030840528,0.00039297628,0.00027244227,0.005479069,0.00068883545,0.0016264963,0.00057235616,0.00051940413,0.0021462066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012552418,0.00010329117,0.0004964709,0.0041603153,0.0014173039,0.0016498978,0.0028804482,0.0007333593,0.00011971999],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057878253,0.00009490081,0.9677203,0.000067645946,0.00012616707,0.000053413743,0.00068994716,0.0025415712,0.00011817052,0.00663067,0.00044014363,0.021459134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000096337235,0.0001567622,0.9411014,0.00016897467,0.00009543546,0.00016364206,0.006977,0.021191934,0.0004618678,0.026944598,0.0026987826,0.000030002993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018614126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040331565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018614126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019234639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000992304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037011564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313590757","doi":"10.1111/conl.12938","title":"Management thresholds shift under the influence of multiple stressors: Eelgrass meadows as a case study","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Marine and coastal plant biology","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Zostera marina; Stressor; Ecosystem; Population growth; Environmental science; Population; Population model; Seagrass; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.024488557989019076,"score_gpt":0.23821228329928942,"score_spread":0.21372372531027034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313590757","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99889994,0.00006104626,0.000567176,0.00007226079,0.000001919601,0.000016588865,0.000043371547,0.000007933461,0.0003298676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965874,0.00008568935,0.0030068308,0.0000527404,0.000004908654,0.000015744798,0.00005382967,0.000003990152,0.00018887244],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965024,0.00019248885,0.000015863501,0.00005026997,0.000035813307,0.00005525859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993068,0.00029703646,0.00011744127,0.00007210115,0.00008533708,0.00012128313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091352727,0.0002555699,0.0002713641,0.000555558,0.0011661474,0.0007479934,0.00048656395,0.0006503859,0.00043608595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008682779,0.00008859163,0.0004619065,0.0005323021,0.0005801357,0.00035174916,0.0005607356,0.00032028975,0.000047584166],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000596641,0.0012004884,0.889278,0.00018809196,0.00042917675,0.011513599,0.0045563728,0.030044181,0.0161821,0.0027329624,0.0018845331,0.041393835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011859371,0.002515018,0.8614451,0.00011295912,0.00037174995,0.003607656,0.016249191,0.094884634,0.007073093,0.0036416473,0.009855783,0.00012457337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027011251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08809659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027011251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012867913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006143171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053708017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317885054","doi":"10.1111/conl.12935","title":"Hunting trophy import bans proposed by the UK may be ineffective and inequitable as conservation policies in multiple social‐ecological contexts","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Trophy; CITES; Endangered species; Government (linguistics); Legislation; Politics; Convention; Business; Natural resource economics; Environmental planning; Ecology; Political science; Geography; Economics; Habitat; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.018785946892680625,"score_gpt":0.244761847885738,"score_spread":0.22597590099305737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317885054","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9152174,0.00034172874,0.0006465315,0.012520577,0.0000882553,0.00003510493,0.00010814585,0.0000134184365,0.071028836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996539,0.000106505126,0.00012581197,0.0009519828,0.000012104327,0.000020612295,0.000028520726,0.000004084916,0.0022113936],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939382,0.0023073338,0.0002465408,0.00038152552,0.0016185086,0.0015077874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97744364,0.009129265,0.007551186,0.001654534,0.0027254121,0.0014959136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074128495,0.00016180633,0.0002234202,0.001056245,0.0035304185,0.0052014887,0.00046731552,0.0017384017,0.0077530863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022286082,0.0001652497,0.00022338571,0.0014459285,0.0063822675,0.0026056154,0.0029480038,0.0020126798,0.00039230645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004721147,0.0006113806,0.5530406,0.00028944135,0.00021917632,0.0017131874,0.04297084,0.0026073372,0.0024784836,0.24282588,0.026687218,0.12608436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069216374,0.00026837565,0.8373139,0.0005152974,0.00007378592,0.0003280571,0.06395894,0.0014078034,0.00078429177,0.03103965,0.064112164,0.00012859082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057915438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15010415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057915438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056167063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039858767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11515671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321441379","doi":"10.1111/conl.12940","title":"High overexploitation risk due to management shortfall in highly traded requiem sharks","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Ichthyology and Marine Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"CITES; Overexploitation; Fisheries management; Fishery; Business; Threatened species; International trade; Fishing; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.012766605572023474,"score_gpt":0.22032118318218757,"score_spread":0.2075545776101641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321441379","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988739,0.000034595258,0.0001827839,0.000028932007,0.0000023201462,0.0000035949934,0.00010673472,0.000004003913,0.00076329237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995596,0.000018689629,0.000099504825,0.000014998102,0.000002029459,0.0000033434633,0.00010751119,9.108011e-7,0.0001934657],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99962234,0.000072970965,0.000045761935,0.00006589153,0.00011894877,0.00007404258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99779737,0.00027316122,0.0014905644,0.0000996713,0.00019721767,0.00014214705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008432624,0.00017775073,0.000120247874,0.0010141124,0.00023279978,0.0004512214,0.00017225985,0.00021256262,0.001849357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017684813,0.00008717934,0.000255953,0.00047028254,0.0003523222,0.0003607248,0.00072339486,0.00020538176,0.00019715625],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048993785,0.000010572846,0.9941963,0.000011619113,0.000032929685,0.00010677831,0.00009725474,0.00040954017,0.0006178464,0.000045861925,0.00010807077,0.0043142335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010220443,0.000042673913,0.99863654,0.000013979346,0.000009237968,0.00014495858,0.00027758742,0.0004958399,0.0001424515,0.0000800532,0.00015302665,0.0000026202813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030517392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008747505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0030517392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031555904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019842054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0061867237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324061749","doi":"10.1111/conl.12943","title":"Economics of conservation law enforcement by rangers across Asia","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford","keywords":"Enforcement; Law enforcement; Geography; Baseline (sea); Business; Biodiversity; Payment; Scale (ratio); China; Environmental resource management; Agricultural economics; Political science; Law; Economics; Finance; Ecology; Archaeology; Cartography","score_opus":0.014414614963880388,"score_gpt":0.2118734204045539,"score_spread":0.1974588054406735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4324061749","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.947541,0.0003262001,0.00062648725,0.00076740666,0.0000066676944,0.000037524693,0.00024423012,0.0000069449984,0.05044368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974788,0.0001282543,0.000117216376,0.000059233676,0.0000045861916,0.000008010682,0.0000495857,0.0000013637049,0.0021528963],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926394,0.00028223844,0.000030126974,0.00007591927,0.00016464158,0.00018312909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969199,0.00063236797,0.0014409033,0.00011676154,0.0004116606,0.0004784361],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008338856,0.000121473764,0.00011492679,0.00076324685,0.00045965475,0.0015022127,0.00046374442,0.00026087102,0.006791244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021684635,0.000109408174,0.00016444162,0.0006564285,0.0007782391,0.0006042136,0.00086413254,0.00031567458,0.00030354297],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019672862,0.0002455946,0.9270586,0.0000704434,0.00011278852,0.00081411086,0.0012634413,0.007027149,0.0011753305,0.01260966,0.003298475,0.046127737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015009684,0.00017371078,0.97933346,0.000069281334,0.000036681347,0.0002425871,0.0052362327,0.0078013726,0.00029851645,0.001637531,0.0051382612,0.0000173097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043093268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08019658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043093268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002769992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094115094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.085684896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383553144","doi":"10.1111/conl.12969","title":"Risky business: Protecting nature, protecting wealth?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Environmental Conservation and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Biodiversity; Harm; Business; Ecosystem services; Natural resource economics; Transformative learning; Environmental resource management; Economics; Finance; Ecosystem; Ecology; Political science","score_opus":0.014141075347318517,"score_gpt":0.2330899347249369,"score_spread":0.21894885937761838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383553144","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.071228676,0.02918388,0.007414696,0.73515105,0.0024936416,0.000047607802,0.00014666557,0.000031390075,0.15430243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93431586,0.019286623,0.0012297023,0.03714113,0.0018960374,0.000030337013,0.000036321362,0.000016604869,0.0060474756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99681145,0.0017359284,0.00011853896,0.00027173955,0.0006602751,0.00040190652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9814751,0.011728862,0.0034864817,0.00046087796,0.0013875542,0.0014611059],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037995258,0.00029865126,0.0004358979,0.0009988111,0.0022825685,0.010280924,0.00062661385,0.003993084,0.010808911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019406073,0.00017677549,0.00017639359,0.0013260519,0.014819391,0.012092294,0.0031794533,0.0043424563,0.00076577265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007501107,0.000084397565,0.009741543,0.00047030594,0.000024470306,0.00045492072,0.003454655,0.00041022772,0.00021643638,0.88529086,0.051074278,0.04870279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002111393,0.000045698696,0.0071571353,0.0016360667,0.000021132102,0.0006485074,0.01894648,0.0009781771,0.0004027705,0.84854,0.12156436,0.000038525748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021998547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027192624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010808911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038372818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031605405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036159396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387574678","doi":"10.1111/conl.12981","title":"Invasion trends: An interpretable measure of change is needed to support policy targets","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council; Monash University; Deutsches Zentrum für integrative Biodiversitätsforschung Halle-Jena-Leipzig; Austrian Science Fund; Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment; Tel Aviv University; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Scale (ratio); Environmental resource management; Alien species; Biodiversity; Process (computing); Data collection; Investment (military); Computer science; Invasive species; Geography; Ecology; Political science; Environmental science; Biology; Cartography","score_opus":0.11506832233224756,"score_gpt":0.30282492320913096,"score_spread":0.1877566008768834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387574678","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17333621,0.00648989,0.37247735,0.24575934,0.0062346514,0.0011044366,0.018866109,0.0038465925,0.17188548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9070252,0.0014229337,0.07981326,0.005133269,0.00072833116,0.0005782439,0.0026140762,0.00043028867,0.0022544172],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97545207,0.01595103,0.0018793157,0.002048058,0.0039322427,0.00073728815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9281194,0.039281048,0.01208725,0.008692053,0.010754981,0.0010651863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024211168,0.0013649222,0.0017400947,0.00434576,0.0013162368,0.011372003,0.0026295534,0.0024888134,0.007485217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1183274,0.00045163577,0.0010090105,0.005586292,0.0028478708,0.012983646,0.0027986253,0.003969247,0.0014215012],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056529255,0.0006603214,0.16486359,0.0026802134,0.0011536742,0.00039790527,0.004891495,0.09711088,0.0027282203,0.28749108,0.121036746,0.3164206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000121704354,0.0005031689,0.1162144,0.0027090237,0.00043964267,0.00025259488,0.014681366,0.21588369,0.0027326676,0.5043686,0.14161693,0.0004762533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022972303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019325376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024211168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055151815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041115456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1280424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388304224","doi":"10.1111/conl.12991","title":"Adopt digital tools to monitor social dimensions of the global biodiversity framework","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Animal and Plant Science Education","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; Sight Research UK","keywords":"Biodiversity; Citizen science; Environmental resource management; Geography; Business; Computer science; Environmental planning; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.06210384650939751,"score_gpt":0.3097610622128865,"score_spread":0.247657215703489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388304224","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049454726,0.0040271287,0.43925825,0.016294712,0.0016034218,0.001845976,0.05442483,0.009834566,0.42325634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37238255,0.005335836,0.5475761,0.0032434454,0.0005500006,0.0040570376,0.037202533,0.0017372075,0.027915234],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99533856,0.0012665681,0.0004638026,0.00080464827,0.0018353671,0.0002910191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98635143,0.0041529927,0.0022702462,0.0027948804,0.0036050836,0.0008253598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007733584,0.0009994921,0.00049647706,0.014088469,0.0015429072,0.0074247313,0.0017140672,0.0010078965,0.010361387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023601392,0.00051663804,0.00085016905,0.013038242,0.002225366,0.014696031,0.006547036,0.0022652876,0.0025849335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006293093,0.00013822227,0.059093416,0.00055701134,0.00014199583,0.000236278,0.009996973,0.0053020865,0.001282911,0.25409818,0.104536034,0.5645539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002717585,0.000043544995,0.034331087,0.00067944854,0.00006505187,0.00018524396,0.008255882,0.010195913,0.0016757676,0.1428345,0.8015678,0.00013862904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02645003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03272273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02645003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032243873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027663063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05259216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388526883","doi":"10.1111/conl.12992","title":"Patch‐scale edge effects do not indicate landscape‐scale fragmentation effects","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Fragmentation (computing); Habitat fragmentation; Forest fragmentation; Scale (ratio); Scale effects; Habitat; Extrapolation; Geography; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology; Mathematics; Statistics; Cartography","score_opus":0.006669338745195094,"score_gpt":0.21960043951864683,"score_spread":0.21293110077345173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388526883","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.972808,0.0024357333,0.0070918505,0.00032984273,0.0000461206,0.000057702295,0.00095153553,0.000032301323,0.016246876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988329,0.00010719805,0.0006513928,0.00006650564,0.000013238056,0.000008378154,0.00015264988,0.000004313609,0.00016348495],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958229,0.0016853363,0.0007271951,0.0008237144,0.00074301654,0.0001977746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86875015,0.089746304,0.022417521,0.012155661,0.0060104206,0.0009200219],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007862177,0.00030551432,0.0004039638,0.002103403,0.00033689546,0.0011068017,0.000582413,0.0007647597,0.0056017884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045627974,0.00021444134,0.00055621105,0.0015651435,0.0013550371,0.001648009,0.0011706487,0.0005571348,0.0004420065],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051359745,0.00002641632,0.9812104,0.00044596125,0.0006200115,0.00017266326,0.00022894508,0.00033063604,0.0019852547,0.0007068228,0.0002317755,0.013527497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033192682,0.00027140175,0.9923636,0.00015036963,0.00041124472,0.0006385543,0.00044121154,0.000788483,0.0019219157,0.0017567588,0.0012121496,0.00001117475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00081332243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018592214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007862177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001943495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019939234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041579664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388846352","doi":"10.1111/conl.12993","title":"Remote seamounts are key conservation priorities for pelagic wildlife","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pelagic zone; Seamount; Wildlife; Key (lock); Wildlife conservation; Geography; Fishery; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Ecology; Environmental science; Oceanography; Biology; Geology","score_opus":0.02782290871394617,"score_gpt":0.23648154090576398,"score_spread":0.20865863219181782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388846352","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3900835,0.035773836,0.008991419,0.11123759,0.008341859,0.001216819,0.0128168035,0.0013551806,0.430183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7640945,0.022584658,0.035934962,0.029750127,0.0019802954,0.0012100923,0.015791696,0.00047092853,0.12818281],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951744,0.00008963298,0.000022800488,0.00006404736,0.00016128506,0.0001448071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989912,0.00009167291,0.0001321836,0.000035408102,0.00030140372,0.00044813062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009895312,0.00040820125,0.00036917516,0.0011243847,0.0030331367,0.002008402,0.0012630582,0.0010373999,0.039890774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016109615,0.00016584132,0.00027524866,0.0009963234,0.0006593343,0.0019169862,0.0027525038,0.001557915,0.0033390282],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015499757,0.00020516636,0.06955349,0.002635515,0.00011887737,0.0013117641,0.008023906,0.0002485498,0.0043270267,0.01680891,0.2627962,0.63381565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028429935,0.00015369753,0.12375057,0.0025666628,0.00013477948,0.0013983294,0.029510418,0.0003588502,0.0006397172,0.01237364,0.82901436,0.00007057364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028108384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12515904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039890774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008049001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004624083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13344789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391319815","doi":"10.1111/conl.13003","title":"The biodiversity adaptation gap: Management actions for marine protected areas in the face of climate change","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Jarislowsky Foundation","keywords":"Climate change; Biodiversity; Marine protected area; Climate change adaptation; Environmental resource management; Adaptation (eye); Face (sociological concept); Biodiversity conservation; Adaptive management; Ecology; Fishery; Geography; Environmental science; Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.06151325452267014,"score_gpt":0.24073502910843683,"score_spread":0.17922177458576669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391319815","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89686394,0.017810848,0.00993135,0.027000468,0.0003991514,0.00038422202,0.005115186,0.00009661758,0.042398263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898768,0.0023973368,0.004631126,0.0014874894,0.00007790049,0.00020363918,0.0007692845,0.000014985992,0.00054147013],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99450374,0.0030884356,0.0006758646,0.0004092613,0.0009632603,0.0003594316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95718753,0.029162072,0.007678625,0.0018452882,0.0034871567,0.00063922576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009628636,0.00018759824,0.00032649023,0.0035667636,0.0012033582,0.0023544345,0.0006771106,0.00066247577,0.0036767758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03568684,0.00013562951,0.00041175683,0.0047604674,0.0013024837,0.0028681143,0.0020126854,0.0008251549,0.00015326163],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000617606,0.000322285,0.43331298,0.011145624,0.0005842215,0.0012285496,0.06995808,0.0048845126,0.0034841555,0.031374823,0.019136686,0.42395043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027377728,0.00017952158,0.7897915,0.008484157,0.00031539876,0.00030943291,0.094536565,0.003388183,0.0018153026,0.012495701,0.08858065,0.00007616341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012691971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028308831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012691971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026339702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004121065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05092174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391485216","doi":"10.1111/conl.13004","title":"Realizing “30 × 30” in India: The potential, the challenges, and the way forward","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India","keywords":"Business; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Geography; Computer science; Natural resource economics; Environmental science; Economics","score_opus":0.032491718061650715,"score_gpt":0.2299212566106915,"score_spread":0.19742953854904077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391485216","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26928726,0.0069705257,0.008703264,0.43430662,0.0013631828,0.00007301182,0.0006242463,0.00020072672,0.27847117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980434,0.0018261885,0.0010997714,0.010139689,0.00021242906,0.000023074192,0.00007262863,0.000024336641,0.0061677997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981402,0.00068810565,0.000038337253,0.00010129857,0.00037104255,0.0006609964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971666,0.0012741594,0.00029821263,0.00016981324,0.00044308216,0.00064813596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024864136,0.0003021297,0.00029702758,0.00046860828,0.0016638862,0.004618356,0.0008845751,0.0015517613,0.008858209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037748774,0.00010725421,0.0005563876,0.00065100915,0.0037967132,0.0026867776,0.0034894596,0.0034772754,0.00065112766],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014120367,0.00008610444,0.007546654,0.0002467177,0.00004657086,0.0008093444,0.0014878259,0.007036895,0.0007578387,0.9040656,0.04741356,0.030361556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046815112,0.00020559243,0.038860433,0.0005239992,0.000060669463,0.0008784245,0.015939148,0.007325896,0.0015226359,0.60836804,0.32609674,0.00017164217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025395853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027596138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025395853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032081064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007438378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05049604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392378610","doi":"10.1111/conl.13007","title":"Tropical field stations yield high conservation return on investment","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Primate Behavior and Ecology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Toronto Zoo; Vancouver Island University; University of Toronto; University of Calgary; University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Investment (military); Biodiversity; Deforestation (computer science); Return on investment; Biodiversity conservation; Business; Habitat; Environmental resource management; Geography; Natural resource economics; Environmental protection; Environmental science; Ecology; Economics; Political science; Biology; Production (economics); Computer science","score_opus":0.05172144037298715,"score_gpt":0.31976006883916425,"score_spread":0.2680386284661771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392378610","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9539153,0.0003081661,0.0015284388,0.0021858,0.00007118839,0.00012001505,0.0012081874,0.000107123364,0.04055576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99465275,0.00011452136,0.0011470899,0.00017648797,0.00002736821,0.000035336056,0.00045140737,0.000011023326,0.0033840996],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980876,0.000743103,0.00009381762,0.00013775221,0.00046378892,0.00047386004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97696257,0.005336728,0.008391749,0.0019083254,0.0033006507,0.0040999106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024515607,0.0002482109,0.0001676139,0.0009942482,0.00047825553,0.0013261859,0.000530836,0.00044063924,0.024541311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013450901,0.00013952094,0.00017662569,0.001075177,0.00037534037,0.0008190235,0.0008757064,0.00038294573,0.0021490199],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034025635,0.0003780507,0.8675293,0.00013229375,0.00012402437,0.00026724426,0.0005321619,0.0011003319,0.0012206915,0.0011358191,0.01220436,0.11503545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023089562,0.00034000445,0.9865731,0.00006763096,0.000030750354,0.00017422992,0.0017031576,0.0009264791,0.00039446622,0.00071521,0.009037718,0.000014119576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029437714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077181137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024541311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011789347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063859194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0820989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393086971","doi":"10.1111/conl.13013","title":"The power of citizen science to advance fungal conservation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University; Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Division of Environmental Biology; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; National Geographic Society; Society for Conservation Biology; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e Inovação do Estado de Santa Catarina; Grantová Agentura České Republiky; National Institutes of Health; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Citizen science; Conservation science; Power (physics); Environmental resource management; Business; Political science; Environmental ethics; Geography; Natural resource economics; Ecology; Biology; Biodiversity; Environmental science; Economics","score_opus":0.016692706087332917,"score_gpt":0.2539382411373439,"score_spread":0.237245535050011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393086971","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009238703,0.0089151,0.03577857,0.865154,0.0067474903,0.00028383592,0.00036157755,0.00034561116,0.073175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42986292,0.036063563,0.1364256,0.3332259,0.013035669,0.001578978,0.0010967897,0.0007924943,0.04791806],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9374116,0.04539389,0.0016373688,0.0036672857,0.0089115165,0.0029783957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.775712,0.15702963,0.0065995934,0.021678798,0.020312075,0.018667951],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07308362,0.0007549188,0.00089185557,0.002862021,0.009068898,0.016653081,0.0030398662,0.011513765,0.020151475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11636441,0.0006276952,0.001242924,0.0029641434,0.0152315255,0.022489011,0.024356503,0.015935438,0.005519276],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016658091,0.00025103314,0.008872433,0.002060758,0.00012422516,0.00089406123,0.028313274,0.0008640485,0.0022642638,0.16320866,0.2722299,0.5207507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027091752,0.00009215216,0.0016198158,0.0017279064,0.000018808227,0.00028910328,0.016104108,0.0007642462,0.0006535292,0.18186475,0.79678303,0.000055406705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004132712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007888606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99696016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006102893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018228577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38650775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394961479","doi":"10.1111/conl.13017","title":"Positive effects of fragmentation per se on the most iconic metapopulation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Metapopulation; Fragmentation (computing); Geography; Habitat fragmentation; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology; Biodiversity; Demography; Population","score_opus":0.037172550120924935,"score_gpt":0.22655970489967117,"score_spread":0.18938715477874624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394961479","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982211,0.0002560351,0.000406048,0.000051601604,0.000003895511,0.0000038136968,0.00008524096,0.000009439062,0.00096270395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996859,0.000028553059,0.00011447502,0.00002059359,0.0000023355976,0.0000018677583,0.000053660784,0.0000018487802,0.00009065242],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994992,0.0001818258,0.000037593472,0.00014240456,0.000063384294,0.00007555011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962521,0.0013340303,0.0009949725,0.0006568344,0.00026676853,0.0004952748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001302201,0.0003173015,0.0003730409,0.00069838215,0.0005346954,0.0010775574,0.0003828855,0.00037801758,0.0029038936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033700461,0.00010297812,0.00052757823,0.0004046529,0.00090484624,0.0007502225,0.0007884695,0.00039579548,0.00016036283],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005464062,0.00012125649,0.9552934,0.00013507144,0.0009483913,0.0002514262,0.0002809614,0.00839133,0.016648998,0.0008536811,0.00030577253,0.016223399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000091217335,0.0003819481,0.9933334,0.000016336699,0.0001464399,0.00017295677,0.00025608225,0.0039469395,0.00046627372,0.0008464055,0.00041365996,0.000010499812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003815023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008018155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003815023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070639484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023418582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009714544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396923733","doi":"10.1111/conl.13022","title":"Risk assessments underestimate threat of pesticides to wild bees","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Insect and Pesticide Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Liber Ero Foundation","keywords":"Pesticide; Biology; Intraspecific competition; Honey bee; Risk assessment; Ecology; Invasive species; Pollinator; Toxicology; Pollination; Pollen","score_opus":0.04816132960443826,"score_gpt":0.3207271063401655,"score_spread":0.27256577673572724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396923733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53732896,0.2280301,0.16211472,0.0092367055,0.0007593191,0.0006790718,0.04041883,0.0022373626,0.019194981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96801704,0.011349673,0.013396127,0.0016506813,0.00013671772,0.00016278515,0.0045096544,0.00021769373,0.00055964175],"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96579325,0.021113489,0.002654622,0.0062514525,0.0038546615,0.00033251356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85947365,0.104725726,0.01605746,0.013673934,0.0056677535,0.00040142218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043760158,0.0015910009,0.0020169828,0.0059379777,0.00045087418,0.0038908473,0.0021666226,0.0011197153,0.0028043545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08041538,0.00087334856,0.008470245,0.004863407,0.001086616,0.0031178202,0.0022204902,0.0018985926,0.0005000326],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027121338,0.00010045222,0.32972547,0.024589933,0.42447436,0.0003709001,0.00069827674,0.054781742,0.005667424,0.005546546,0.0076958444,0.14363697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006560734,0.0018976718,0.3620898,0.013894869,0.42458537,0.0013137652,0.0016149087,0.06752673,0.014536077,0.03975965,0.07175514,0.00036987916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008199043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049837944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043760158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012179038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010648018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23142862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398140325","doi":"10.1111/conl.13023","title":"Urgent actions needed by digital services platforms to help achieve conservation and public health goals","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Zoonotic diseases and public health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Oxford Brookes University","keywords":"Business; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Process management; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Environmental science","score_opus":0.04109381048309573,"score_gpt":0.30578666979874375,"score_spread":0.264692859315648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398140325","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028963874,0.006101777,0.010143194,0.8943958,0.009135268,0.00037471973,0.001362121,0.0017833604,0.07380739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12678802,0.032782163,0.115826346,0.599428,0.013824437,0.0018721459,0.010459115,0.001453031,0.09756666],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98251843,0.0065130405,0.0007201015,0.00094261905,0.005787335,0.0035185446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94896054,0.013171933,0.0018658065,0.0028201574,0.014783968,0.018397612],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015903205,0.0015923497,0.0008547934,0.0024138016,0.005254126,0.0197451,0.0042685424,0.022035748,0.07352296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038754415,0.00060999877,0.0014634654,0.002096256,0.004262092,0.027992513,0.01544865,0.015961997,0.030799866],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010695931,0.00024015087,0.0013550739,0.00075416075,0.0000323911,0.00034584876,0.0013687294,0.0005347436,0.0017599488,0.082014196,0.755471,0.15601689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031167325,0.00005899731,0.0009016781,0.00085655454,0.000016494647,0.00018991914,0.0044202455,0.00094344135,0.00049965363,0.045200262,0.94683105,0.000050413437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008612465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008513106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07352296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00441617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03320119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2459588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398222045","doi":"10.1111/conl.13024","title":"Corporate disclosures need a biodiversity outcome focus and regulatory backing to deliver global conservation goals","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Environmental Conservation and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; Sight Research UK","keywords":"Business; Biodiversity conservation; Environmental resource management; Nature Conservation; Biodiversity; Environmental planning; Focus (optics); Outcome (game theory); Geography; Ecology; Environmental science; Economics; Biology","score_opus":0.029394762942925996,"score_gpt":0.23009083757206192,"score_spread":0.2006960746291359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398222045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033975188,0.0031167557,0.048744254,0.4419133,0.0036603464,0.00051719707,0.00015956875,0.0006137499,0.4672997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7716872,0.0022671423,0.034487594,0.14000192,0.0030599227,0.0005240715,0.00023050142,0.00032220976,0.047419414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9384944,0.02314015,0.004098158,0.0033774902,0.025592124,0.005297701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81402814,0.08174317,0.024365015,0.015896484,0.054646175,0.009321052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07363614,0.0006231008,0.0005359575,0.0024640427,0.005555246,0.030654559,0.0025728263,0.014140124,0.012950976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14219578,0.0005536012,0.000793821,0.0015822395,0.010481428,0.017246317,0.009862971,0.012446659,0.003106869],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004583912,0.00017725749,0.0039393576,0.0003222043,0.000025204123,0.0003420355,0.003017435,0.0012221795,0.001927121,0.8587103,0.07092461,0.05934639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009118715,0.00021936727,0.008449751,0.0023041742,0.00007893735,0.00051547104,0.0057536303,0.0031384977,0.005519662,0.35898826,0.61469036,0.00025063878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069918307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008067996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07363614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00914303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022785928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38942975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399829467","doi":"10.1111/conl.13037","title":"An operational methodology to identify Critical Ecosystem Areas to help nations achieve the Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Environmental Conservation and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Queensland","keywords":"Biodiversity; Environmental resource management; Ecosystem; Geography; Ecosystem services; Biodiversity conservation; Environmental planning; Business; Environmental science; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.04229271197466987,"score_gpt":0.332412272595263,"score_spread":0.29011956062059313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399829467","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011385316,0.00048404324,0.93774444,0.0022385656,0.00011989859,0.0015818361,0.0017434616,0.000459963,0.044242457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13247576,0.00023611172,0.86201966,0.00020055976,0.00004897999,0.0011237462,0.0013704262,0.00007595508,0.002448822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99214876,0.0035816354,0.00093777117,0.00082882214,0.0018174913,0.0006854942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98830193,0.004135013,0.0015461114,0.0009668133,0.004389534,0.0006605568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014058861,0.0018354903,0.00072030415,0.01540387,0.0031409198,0.007662992,0.0031680954,0.0016538257,0.007684258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022938097,0.0004966034,0.001871897,0.0078291865,0.0062516127,0.0047769994,0.0043162555,0.0018696008,0.00088302523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028733373,0.000089695124,0.0070535913,0.00031458668,0.00007308383,0.00032995874,0.0027735159,0.032549556,0.0013745949,0.87410045,0.013273405,0.06803877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053221138,0.00018710167,0.010980699,0.001444738,0.00017325344,0.0007481002,0.016264949,0.24622108,0.0038850775,0.5258922,0.1939189,0.00023070263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08301613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.078933306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08301613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010523414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016418427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16506582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401745233","doi":"10.1111/conl.13045","title":"Ecosystem extent is a necessary but not sufficient indicator of the state of global forest biodiversity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Wildlife Conservation Society","keywords":"Biodiversity; Headline; Ecosystem; Environmental resource management; Scope (computer science); Ecosystem services; Forest ecology; Component (thermodynamics); Ecology; Environmental science; Business; Biology; Computer science","score_opus":0.011234474511842125,"score_gpt":0.19230194067737091,"score_spread":0.1810674661655288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401745233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96748126,0.00050506357,0.0029930964,0.00029622513,0.000015884068,0.000034777902,0.001859414,0.00003534418,0.026778895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986706,0.00005152671,0.00058050203,0.000016366153,0.0000050747094,0.0000049408895,0.00029693425,0.0000035930725,0.0003705162],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902856,0.0004504148,0.000053381907,0.00012457749,0.00026432556,0.000078859644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936406,0.002778459,0.0016449123,0.00051799975,0.00094834407,0.00046970687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025701039,0.00026584475,0.0002533056,0.0016691611,0.00031895447,0.0017021593,0.00028710553,0.00022450477,0.0037051681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063510044,0.00010165629,0.00024096729,0.0018909321,0.00077959447,0.0017196464,0.001081825,0.00029198462,0.00030029783],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012527056,0.000027583004,0.97944915,0.000066264554,0.00012310539,0.000037642396,0.000121266065,0.0032212944,0.00073046994,0.0010953387,0.0004475789,0.01455508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026560997,0.00006181365,0.9941255,0.000041163534,0.000043051146,0.000038096925,0.00043833716,0.0030400513,0.000435698,0.00076277315,0.0010008055,0.000010020068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016829751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049233697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016829751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005593779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005765213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033463597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402234343","doi":"10.1111/conl.13047","title":"A primer for the practice of reflexivity in conservation science","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Saskatchewan; Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexivity; Transparency (behavior); Conservation science; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Best practice; Process (computing); Public relations; Work (physics); Political science; Computer science; Social science; Ecology; Engineering; Biology","score_opus":0.05191582748473271,"score_gpt":0.3354589659664698,"score_spread":0.28354313848173707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402234343","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003099577,0.010180005,0.40086547,0.5310677,0.009213741,0.0012976486,0.00007945058,0.00059886125,0.043597523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20402274,0.010759438,0.63996404,0.11949719,0.004318929,0.006995561,0.000113233706,0.00087510614,0.013453724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.5318531,0.42146343,0.01560905,0.0076942844,0.02034958,0.003030621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.33203274,0.5897553,0.01274801,0.028915554,0.03045369,0.00609477],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.33162174,0.0017234957,0.0023094423,0.0055297944,0.011336622,0.029429886,0.007449247,0.028173229,0.005649605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3035072,0.0020306972,0.0026472972,0.0041939574,0.115766026,0.04264144,0.018253097,0.05117269,0.0032368694],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039770614,0.00010019665,0.00015292261,0.00070611975,0.000019153767,0.00033619034,0.0876203,0.00038973553,0.0004491995,0.8778134,0.014530718,0.017842198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048543265,0.000084862,0.00008747476,0.0050652805,0.0000164199,0.00048244456,0.019878538,0.0009924286,0.00062338664,0.69533306,0.2772993,0.000088273475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017135573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012566557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66837823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011072683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026716622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8242294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403400657","doi":"10.1111/conl.13062","title":"Collaborative conservation for snow leopards: Lessons learned from successful community‐based interventions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MaRS; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"Darwin Initiative; Whitley Fund for Nature","keywords":"Snow leopard; Psychological intervention; Geography; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Wildlife conservation; Biodiversity conservation; Ecology; Habitat; Biodiversity; Environmental science; Psychology; Biology","score_opus":0.06924503338032272,"score_gpt":0.3211994094590489,"score_spread":0.25195437607872617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403400657","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6904537,0.026520852,0.054555237,0.12475907,0.0023257474,0.009989854,0.00059486117,0.00070209516,0.09009864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9399679,0.00850746,0.041854467,0.0040473877,0.00027217265,0.0030163664,0.000113292466,0.000055602883,0.0021654004],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877943,0.009463246,0.00027487703,0.0005758671,0.0009086639,0.0009829804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9845334,0.0116502,0.0005974273,0.0006658183,0.0011681261,0.0013849576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015962956,0.0010160495,0.00074007636,0.0008565709,0.0019099732,0.0022362373,0.0025284318,0.0018225246,0.00634501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019962924,0.00025191254,0.0008528718,0.00067728816,0.0022159943,0.0021489656,0.0034986343,0.0018330327,0.0003746247],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005908896,0.012401262,0.00669725,0.00723482,0.0004059876,0.0010344418,0.013462239,0.0056773974,0.0009474519,0.011175861,0.018975189,0.9213974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008534028,0.050527614,0.1268469,0.063746795,0.00379955,0.0022614338,0.1210385,0.044945315,0.013980016,0.16167863,0.40209788,0.0005433554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008198903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01676692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015962956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025208918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008516621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08442122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404190222","doi":"10.1111/conl.13067","title":"First Evidence of Individual Sharks Involved in Multiple Predatory Bites on People","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Ichthyology and Marine Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Canadian Celiac Association","keywords":"Biology; Fishery; Predation; Ecology; Zoology","score_opus":0.03139915565394782,"score_gpt":0.24122296856991796,"score_spread":0.20982381291597013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404190222","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99855655,0.000027623806,0.0001676326,0.000030393607,0.000007654689,0.0000034927405,0.000038984315,0.0000040018276,0.0011637302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99936324,0.000016697226,0.00025675548,0.00001898862,0.0000063721454,0.0000017439808,0.00003680401,0.0000010640994,0.00029842215],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996697,0.00005395662,0.00002581473,0.00008489863,0.00009377565,0.00007189309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998922,0.00021811343,0.00035912605,0.00013215252,0.00018022876,0.0001883766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029425186,0.00019847277,0.00018323462,0.0009136208,0.0006814993,0.00038922357,0.0002639279,0.00058254035,0.0042243805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008889579,0.00020886118,0.00019901474,0.00032584628,0.0007550058,0.00023017422,0.00046202517,0.00035349283,0.00045914022],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018700257,0.000065182816,0.9634739,0.00004080737,0.000044243923,0.0031589398,0.0011771361,0.00006677162,0.0237095,0.00013810208,0.00033398642,0.007604451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027742137,0.00015003388,0.9889361,0.000013551996,0.000017086277,0.006416383,0.0016911377,0.00013162562,0.0020144414,0.000094135365,0.00052640913,0.000006356406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020976937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036542777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042243805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018612955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012641586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014131963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407378781","doi":"10.1111/conl.13088","title":"Reconciling Different Forms of Ecological Integrity to Aid the Kunming‐Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Sapienza Università di Roma","keywords":"Biodiversity; Geography; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Biodiversity conservation; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.016284653292242365,"score_gpt":0.2261236407727628,"score_spread":0.20983898748052043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407378781","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41818285,0.011540854,0.14147769,0.028899943,0.0003315604,0.00051997404,0.013030549,0.000660942,0.38535562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9745694,0.00064444187,0.020231314,0.00034240054,0.000022595483,0.00007841219,0.0010817772,0.000045387766,0.0029843466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99776804,0.00076710276,0.00006765827,0.00019222559,0.0007090347,0.0004959942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971938,0.00034988153,0.0005073298,0.0002780906,0.0012140753,0.00045680394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003677763,0.00060795166,0.00036197668,0.0056630033,0.0020769928,0.00557942,0.001516241,0.00046125066,0.0044492306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071108667,0.00017629827,0.00035887808,0.005750203,0.0037994157,0.002350599,0.0042976676,0.00089959125,0.00015797898],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013275276,0.00006239681,0.2162124,0.00040891528,0.00035413803,0.00043730086,0.005982261,0.051343966,0.0015369887,0.47037646,0.04267961,0.21047285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018319919,0.00009179418,0.5571514,0.001011368,0.00016419905,0.00020775814,0.011860089,0.047146443,0.0015492173,0.17327036,0.20727102,0.00025808005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.61352515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.791557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61352515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014927579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01239386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77750176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407397873","doi":"10.1111/conl.13080","title":"Mismatch Between Global Importance of Peatlands and the Extent of Their Protection","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Wildlife Conservation Society Canada","funders":"European Research Council; Natural Environment Research Council; European Commission; Sight Research UK","keywords":"Peat; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Business; Environmental protection; Natural resource economics; Ecology; Biology; Economics","score_opus":0.010570203192948257,"score_gpt":0.220670106042306,"score_spread":0.21009990284935773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407397873","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98236555,0.0005097769,0.0004429893,0.0007657148,0.000022466105,0.0000036210283,0.00041529594,0.000009832327,0.015464669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996331,0.0000646209,0.000057833353,0.000022342761,0.0000043222476,8.4342975e-7,0.00006075565,0.000001790175,0.00015448133],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997675,0.00006042547,0.000018888868,0.000047772,0.00003858348,0.00006686519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985904,0.00035692015,0.00041194836,0.00012785057,0.0002812805,0.00023147128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007829432,0.00008277786,0.000113211056,0.0007707976,0.00020104575,0.00081672566,0.00013318118,0.00013636803,0.0054718377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027203346,0.000045785862,0.000091464775,0.0009379793,0.00045814755,0.0009984866,0.000859574,0.00025051425,0.00029020678],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017857346,0.000024919227,0.92395484,0.00016284004,0.00009717134,0.00022724915,0.0012015995,0.0011049414,0.0035999632,0.007906212,0.001669752,0.059871964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022015513,0.000015219953,0.99014014,0.000045713514,0.000012637063,0.00014966844,0.0023439943,0.00034185036,0.00032807118,0.0032730836,0.0033425288,0.000004911812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035420845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009559024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054718377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003062866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002611572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018305063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408321629","doi":"10.1111/conl.13092","title":"A Survey of Mammal and Fish Genetic Diversity Across the Global Protected Area Network","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Dalhousie University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Deutsches Zentrum für integrative Biodiversitätsforschung Halle-Jena-Leipzig; Universität Leipzig; U.S. Geological Survey; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Mammal; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Diversity (politics); Geography; Fishery; Marine mammal; Genetic diversity; Biodiversity; Ecology; Biology; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Population; Political science","score_opus":0.017744148196489704,"score_gpt":0.23706457377590934,"score_spread":0.21932042557941964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408321629","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99934155,0.00004197819,0.00005677829,0.000019507976,7.3956375e-7,0.0000027218928,0.00032600228,0.0000016040326,0.0002091722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992524,0.000044666995,0.00017465334,0.000012474789,0.0000026718915,0.000005649553,0.00041477123,7.837993e-7,0.00009201909],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998337,0.00005659299,0.000012101384,0.000046413465,0.000031897285,0.000019166453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929655,0.00012529944,0.0003486741,0.000057272573,0.00006178779,0.00011039072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043897482,0.00009605513,0.000101267935,0.0008881959,0.0002113424,0.00019451245,0.00016934842,0.0001354682,0.00076541264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007219934,0.00006719796,0.000107160566,0.0009706805,0.00027955376,0.00024445134,0.00032915614,0.00017435754,0.00009164663],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021935371,0.000009050576,0.9963582,0.000008327975,0.000029992967,0.000021319596,0.0001676203,0.00007649628,0.0005836569,0.00002849212,0.000093237104,0.0026016315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.048279e-7,0.000014949031,0.9996278,0.0000024571555,0.00000387034,0.000034406505,0.00010549284,0.00006356923,0.000030305513,0.000011647748,0.000103842074,7.8063925e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007887737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017703548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007887737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023772525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001657588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015683651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408661896","doi":"10.1111/conl.13097","title":"Urgent Policy Change Is Needed to Understand the Dimensions of Legal International Wildlife Trade to Enable Targeted Management","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Wildlife trade; Business; Environmental resource management; Wildlife management; Environmental planning; Natural resource economics; Wildlife conservation; Geography; Ecology; Environmental science; Economics","score_opus":0.019867260639908867,"score_gpt":0.24849957765226768,"score_spread":0.2286323170123588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408661896","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002150783,0.006274771,0.0037403195,0.9646564,0.0028326244,0.00006470938,0.00014601075,0.00010272179,0.020031642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12536888,0.030112145,0.03796341,0.7835441,0.0059461603,0.00062524015,0.00086887996,0.00018494336,0.015386152],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98696494,0.005389943,0.00070950977,0.0010177639,0.0033957215,0.0025220471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8866376,0.062253017,0.006917604,0.0039873426,0.023544129,0.016660346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02322684,0.00060327427,0.0014010859,0.002192968,0.0041277558,0.016577771,0.005039933,0.016804205,0.03732968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05591346,0.0004905389,0.0013335117,0.0020470414,0.010942354,0.023952587,0.0077245953,0.023345187,0.0037242821],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049538623,0.0003040224,0.003692518,0.0017690497,0.000066714296,0.0003272608,0.0016513669,0.002278243,0.00095986243,0.33345184,0.52856,0.12688966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026370704,0.00005544857,0.004074252,0.0042846887,0.00003993072,0.00022603228,0.01099638,0.0016552584,0.00041989126,0.2054757,0.7726222,0.00012383115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03778515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047072712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03778515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012934522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06275695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.124880195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409683985","doi":"10.1111/conl.13102","title":"Passive Acoustic Gliders Are Effective Monitoring Tools for Dynamic Management Plans Aimed at Mitigating Whale‐Vessel Strikes","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Underwater Vehicles and Communication Systems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Ocean Tracking Network; Transport Canada; University of New Brunswick","funders":"Transport Canada","keywords":"Business; Whale; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Fishery; Environmental planning; Biology","score_opus":0.012894716490060526,"score_gpt":0.2347045597769779,"score_spread":0.22180984328691739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409683985","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9923741,0.0000977862,0.0038978118,0.000050953513,0.000008901875,0.000046139812,0.00013161168,0.000049968265,0.0033427463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964336,0.000061597304,0.002852644,0.000018019544,0.0000029318803,0.0000087759045,0.0000661209,0.0000036048575,0.00055267656],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99978083,0.000032032713,0.000010224883,0.000039505358,0.00009738928,0.00004003085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995276,0.00010762007,0.00014913124,0.00003782312,0.00013611045,0.00004170339],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032675522,0.0002125146,0.00012340893,0.00037923557,0.0002446066,0.0003911602,0.00025857208,0.000182239,0.0010106397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00089482067,0.00011215237,0.00007820532,0.00023717308,0.00027090163,0.00035147008,0.00030328234,0.00015459774,0.00017402752],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003571146,0.00011814874,0.7258505,0.00018018899,0.00008494715,0.00027165204,0.0009945132,0.004646231,0.13063669,0.0002403094,0.00087631703,0.13574328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012016184,0.000891733,0.97313434,0.000037741233,0.00005700936,0.00021303806,0.00227579,0.0064281425,0.013455967,0.00012783108,0.0033497235,0.000016700553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02717183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.086973295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02717183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029273162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000457244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05402732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409870524","doi":"10.1111/conl.13099","title":"Protect the Integrity of CITES: Lessons From Japan's IWC Withdrawal to Keep Polarization From Tearing CITES Apart","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions; HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme; Global Challenges Research Fund; UK Research and Innovation; University of Queensland; European Commission; Northern Arizona University","keywords":"CITES; Geography; Business; Biology; Fishery","score_opus":0.023804055067061392,"score_gpt":0.26543264503914843,"score_spread":0.24162858997208703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409870524","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13723657,0.009711823,0.0031233542,0.7212757,0.00432917,0.00006266551,0.00006769136,0.00008390418,0.12410906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8122444,0.0043859184,0.003066024,0.13183513,0.0021477726,0.000090133544,0.000057005473,0.00007815583,0.046095263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960886,0.0009770838,0.0002885055,0.00047364624,0.000933532,0.0012385147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98527133,0.00399986,0.0015738246,0.0015588824,0.0041860444,0.0034099584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008139736,0.0003556174,0.00029814683,0.0008550179,0.011656795,0.011104494,0.0015319671,0.009310365,0.004414946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0125140995,0.00024569067,0.0003929186,0.00090436183,0.013450934,0.006696663,0.0061470433,0.009783082,0.0006894279],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017660287,0.0003339892,0.021562412,0.000819481,0.00010197229,0.005436834,0.07898424,0.0010625989,0.007050446,0.44722164,0.28963685,0.14761281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037335158,0.0001427186,0.018826313,0.00066494115,0.000082387334,0.000359362,0.0455622,0.0005504274,0.0016434035,0.07082239,0.86116374,0.00014483716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037857406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05998514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037857406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063720453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013011437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07527411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410960045","doi":"10.1111/conl.13104","title":"Avoid Cherry‐Picking Targets and Embrace Holistic Conservation to Pursue the Global Biodiversity Framework","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit","keywords":"Interim; Biodiversity conservation; Biodiversity; Action (physics); Harmony (color); Political science; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Business; Geography; Economics; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.015694214504935827,"score_gpt":0.23369186801487984,"score_spread":0.21799765350994402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410960045","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1439094,0.0045371964,0.1026403,0.38026673,0.017559815,0.0013006513,0.0006059382,0.0016033095,0.34757665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83109754,0.0012445365,0.06009017,0.06959575,0.0018267987,0.00094147166,0.00047343847,0.0006361094,0.03409418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9404459,0.032788616,0.0024954446,0.0021934095,0.015864817,0.006211866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91921973,0.024078777,0.007645614,0.010210283,0.024244677,0.014600923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.053638455,0.00062409125,0.0006571853,0.0018078578,0.0062106233,0.01478647,0.0024215346,0.0055024726,0.010222497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08205964,0.0004285811,0.00059049675,0.0020513926,0.0079699755,0.008709342,0.013570477,0.010990363,0.0025766483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020136009,0.00026377582,0.014578249,0.0011868696,0.00008615872,0.0013947368,0.033313878,0.0032258136,0.0039470196,0.3908618,0.387831,0.16310932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035958816,0.00026614958,0.01391836,0.0017287572,0.00003088598,0.0009454418,0.034822516,0.0034043451,0.0021242306,0.21748076,0.7249916,0.00025104822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039675655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008931456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053638455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005483813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022077527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28367066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411495984","doi":"10.1111/conl.13110","title":"Resolving Uncertainties in the Legality of Wildlife Trade to Support Better Outcomes for Wildlife and People","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"A.G. Leventis Foundation; University of Oxford; UK Research and Innovation","keywords":"Wildlife trade; Wildlife; Business; CLARITY; Livelihood; Sustainability; Principle of legality; Enforcement; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Compromise; Stakeholder; Traceability; Economics; Geography; Political science; Agriculture; Ecology; Public relations; Engineering","score_opus":0.016406085195843783,"score_gpt":0.25683273979809296,"score_spread":0.24042665460224918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411495984","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32011318,0.0038141252,0.14089714,0.1719187,0.0007072062,0.0004157962,0.00043062106,0.00023140879,0.36147183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877078,0.0006022884,0.007825346,0.0020394088,0.00009016598,0.000083482446,0.00006803379,0.000022863831,0.0015605241],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9797458,0.011923725,0.0012718803,0.0015113967,0.00343836,0.0021088978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8934874,0.067943946,0.016682522,0.007775325,0.010395663,0.003715151],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032837663,0.0004389384,0.00053964264,0.002376208,0.0071594054,0.014877466,0.0026000969,0.0053656315,0.016621236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.100431696,0.00044271216,0.00055360486,0.00173535,0.016815003,0.01774677,0.011463122,0.0048166662,0.0008842575],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012525066,0.00030492694,0.049678337,0.00061079214,0.0000841685,0.0011270131,0.018635156,0.013220203,0.0013768582,0.79730433,0.009896476,0.10763644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022001826,0.00008765735,0.011427191,0.0017186963,0.00004768202,0.00029495277,0.03179352,0.008865528,0.0011806857,0.8764265,0.06803533,0.00010023584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0082033435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012724744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032837663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008736799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015736777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17366421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411591737","doi":"10.1111/conl.13117","title":"Applying the Key Biodiversity Area Standard to Important Sites for Sharks","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Ichthyology and Marine Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Shark Conservation Fund; James Cook University","keywords":"Key (lock); Biodiversity; Marine protected area; Fishery; Geography; Marine biodiversity; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.01723851813449117,"score_gpt":0.23124461608127056,"score_spread":0.21400609794677938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411591737","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6837507,0.00091523124,0.09934823,0.0022880791,0.0015587006,0.0029201275,0.021112638,0.00088043447,0.18722582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9306293,0.0001353044,0.055713218,0.00050272595,0.000083742365,0.0010324203,0.006836659,0.00010198528,0.0049645198],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99004245,0.002281598,0.0019067237,0.0009464255,0.0039247763,0.0008979165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96349835,0.0055562686,0.0071660536,0.0036722014,0.018615065,0.001492019],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007846688,0.00061515725,0.00047892184,0.0075677093,0.0017600398,0.002587466,0.00184141,0.0007541127,0.009675377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032495856,0.000229274,0.00075779646,0.004592941,0.0015826283,0.0024552646,0.003666904,0.0009753304,0.0022237794],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052836357,0.00017055582,0.7617625,0.0009297018,0.00014232259,0.00047974594,0.003942737,0.0057832683,0.0062672696,0.02989161,0.042955033,0.1471469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063100684,0.00046360662,0.8612547,0.00072289945,0.000115326206,0.0006726043,0.0142323,0.017335083,0.0059921243,0.015802832,0.08320763,0.0001377992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039218932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07765443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039218932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002962226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035745676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07798129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412418089","doi":"10.1111/conl.13101","title":"Complex Measures of Habitat Fragmentation and Edge Can Complicate Biodiversity Conservation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Carleton University; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada","keywords":"Fragmentation (computing); Habitat fragmentation; Biodiversity; Biodiversity conservation; Habitat; Geography; Habitat destruction; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Habitat conservation; Wildlife corridor; Conservation biology; Environmental science; Agroforestry; Biology","score_opus":0.03422144507877225,"score_gpt":0.23844206155174813,"score_spread":0.20422061647297587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412418089","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87089247,0.0034091917,0.089476466,0.0015079008,0.00017990854,0.00014133309,0.00082476955,0.00026235092,0.033305626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98225325,0.00039454186,0.015999304,0.00023207362,0.00005205803,0.000038519032,0.00019915537,0.00006439377,0.0007665898],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99750286,0.0010166399,0.00022660087,0.0004139307,0.0007298265,0.00011008333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96659875,0.022465378,0.0064917756,0.0023412935,0.0014534357,0.000649254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040011425,0.0004428945,0.0005631217,0.002058487,0.0006342533,0.0021893303,0.0006279761,0.0005601438,0.0035937391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0328509,0.0002807988,0.00036458694,0.002570467,0.0015822313,0.0036870416,0.0016661794,0.0009540392,0.00031422518],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023691544,0.0001136051,0.7155781,0.0004863928,0.0006007441,0.00043200044,0.0017506349,0.030552633,0.0056608687,0.02806909,0.004976249,0.21154281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014243361,0.00016766695,0.90752655,0.00021351098,0.00012367289,0.000699569,0.0013941367,0.031453807,0.0014934376,0.048481032,0.008341579,0.000090840964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030115973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076190326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0040011425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005477408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002583412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021160305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412863045","doi":"10.1111/conl.13123","title":"Future Climate‐Driven Ecological Disruption in a Network of Marine Protected Areas on Canada's East Coast","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Coastal and Marine Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Bedford Institute of Oceanography; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; The Audio Recording Academy; Dalhousie University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Jarislowsky Foundation","keywords":"Marine protected area; Geography; East coast; Climate change; Fishery; Marine reserve; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Environmental science; Habitat; Fishing; Physical geography; Biology","score_opus":0.005856425637834533,"score_gpt":0.19004855909519236,"score_spread":0.18419213345735783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412863045","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973731,0.00005277217,0.0004056462,0.00016622985,0.0000027498195,0.000007501965,0.00071662944,0.000018244931,0.001257111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991935,0.000020610985,0.00036355856,0.000014883271,5.465825e-7,0.000003509022,0.00023638332,0.0000015746552,0.0001653861],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997943,0.000026660959,0.000008217397,0.00004369427,0.000059553324,0.00006752377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926776,0.00007764482,0.00016449984,0.000038271715,0.00028343362,0.00016844986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004074022,0.00018969987,0.00017114707,0.0010356727,0.0010130068,0.001112264,0.00047043565,0.00027511065,0.0010574744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015196458,0.000092743365,0.00020284185,0.0015972926,0.00051627355,0.00032816318,0.00070762716,0.00026480504,0.000046268506],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007021947,0.000028510973,0.9378429,0.000027974082,0.00007983619,0.00018000595,0.0004173884,0.047806654,0.0011302368,0.0014540484,0.0012498383,0.009712409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071194913,0.000024425488,0.9053785,0.000021941898,0.000031462376,0.000078853736,0.0018077459,0.08921721,0.00032960734,0.0009963276,0.0020879153,0.00001897103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9058829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9384675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.094117105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010386569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046835155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18934274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412864269","doi":"10.1111/conl.13109","title":"Stakeholder Consensus on Conservation Priorities Across Scientific, NGO, and Governmental Sectors","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; Agencia Estatal de Investigación; General Secretariat for Research and Technology; Danmarks Grundforskningsfond; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Directorate-General XII, Science, Research, and Development; National Research Foundation; Fundación Biodiversidad; European Commission; Biodiversa+; Innovationsfonden","keywords":"Stakeholder; Business; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Nature Conservation; Marine protected area; Political science; Geography; Public relations; Ecology; Economics; Biology","score_opus":0.11872254079089783,"score_gpt":0.23243824288291998,"score_spread":0.11371570209202214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412864269","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95755357,0.0003511709,0.0073687383,0.0043758373,0.00002975173,0.00006354151,0.00010495065,0.000008724391,0.030143589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999368,0.000035227717,0.00033373217,0.00011536379,0.0000030452597,0.000008395075,0.000016908474,0.0000012362677,0.000118088414],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9778491,0.015893565,0.0008439567,0.0007285453,0.00303357,0.0016512016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95820165,0.02803442,0.004542901,0.0017695675,0.005684917,0.0017665063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031329915,0.00019379528,0.00037811612,0.0020822196,0.001983202,0.0028931333,0.0006285599,0.0010215825,0.0031603603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0425736,0.00017918543,0.00034382747,0.0014118858,0.0023702122,0.0022486611,0.003448468,0.0009882508,0.00014887723],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009765781,0.00020328735,0.63632697,0.00076311536,0.00044706117,0.0011825964,0.09284303,0.010812513,0.0054063443,0.10543462,0.0055690752,0.14003485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009698675,0.00033204455,0.4263592,0.0010828186,0.00014020219,0.00046075252,0.3354511,0.022864636,0.001635968,0.18017408,0.031207703,0.0001944674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043606716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049474174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031329915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031847428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019215881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16569042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413804796","doi":"10.1111/conl.13138","title":"Using Scenarios for Reducing Uncertainties in Biodiversity Conservation: From Global Targets to European Steppes","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agencia Estatal de Investigación; European Regional Development Fund; Universidad de Valladolid; European Commission","keywords":"Environmental resource management; Safeguarding; Environmental planning; Scenario analysis; Steppe; Biodiversity; Resource (disambiguation); Business; Ecosystem services; Ecosystem; Geography; Ecology; Environmental science; Computer science","score_opus":0.02639981278788029,"score_gpt":0.2603374735749022,"score_spread":0.23393766078702194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413804796","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52793974,0.0018769362,0.31098768,0.011123045,0.00022574552,0.001297335,0.0019052158,0.00041700283,0.1442272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9341687,0.00041766968,0.06381287,0.00022357452,0.000013267939,0.0004792679,0.00026704578,0.000037231013,0.00058042136],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98302335,0.015244663,0.00024123986,0.0004194266,0.00071144255,0.00035988473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9772061,0.019326255,0.0008033667,0.0011395669,0.0010491596,0.00047561782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018532924,0.0012864082,0.0005545652,0.0031791467,0.0012306571,0.004469615,0.0013859998,0.0020968853,0.0046665776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030442802,0.00038919554,0.0010150109,0.0035811514,0.0022553834,0.0047388216,0.004058588,0.0015091699,0.00016296949],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004029462,0.00020605262,0.006467671,0.00048104205,0.00037318075,0.0010647762,0.0036119157,0.64233834,0.001231275,0.28378832,0.0035780226,0.056456454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001676383,0.00036552871,0.0052160593,0.0012360442,0.00022517682,0.0002681659,0.0102869645,0.4030109,0.0030391712,0.53965604,0.036344834,0.00018346806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051582158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007078372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018532924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004722043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023032157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098012626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414666363","doi":"10.1111/conl.13150","title":"What Will Count?—Evidence for the Global Recognition of Other Effective area–based Conservation Measures","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Australian Research Council; Monash University","keywords":"Credibility; Conservation science; Biodiversity conservation","score_opus":0.04347913327997927,"score_gpt":0.2557004493032059,"score_spread":0.21222131602322664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414666363","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6948102,0.02457369,0.014854469,0.0786455,0.0021865817,0.00045804496,0.0059148395,0.00016065936,0.17839608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926813,0.0010896478,0.001930768,0.0026393628,0.00028731415,0.00005296592,0.0007304206,0.00004936439,0.0005388273],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95222175,0.022397622,0.004596184,0.008389917,0.010199365,0.0021951909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4689537,0.34302437,0.11923681,0.03337297,0.027392033,0.008020055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06197949,0.00044214114,0.00080334337,0.0062109292,0.0015856646,0.0062686936,0.003428897,0.0025659464,0.013510803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25983003,0.00034603136,0.00085252157,0.009337249,0.008785879,0.008894987,0.004532931,0.0036220811,0.000898488],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006120615,0.00015877673,0.7969306,0.0033553673,0.0011893547,0.0004644694,0.008557778,0.0011770654,0.00022687783,0.04308559,0.0152036995,0.12903845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012335935,0.00034690683,0.8583273,0.0066832756,0.0006649942,0.00049126387,0.022528313,0.003340107,0.00064352504,0.03747848,0.06921635,0.00015606044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011637045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012960092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06197949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018308617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024386656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32778275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416110761","doi":"10.1111/conl.13154","title":"Connectivity of Forest Patches via Wooded Corridors Increases Biodiversity at Low, but Not High, Forest Amounts","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Nature Conservancy of Canada","keywords":"Biodiversity; Forest restoration; Intact forest landscape; Forest structure; Forest ecology; Forest farming; Secondary forest; Biodiversity conservation","score_opus":0.008745227377584385,"score_gpt":0.19765155853572935,"score_spread":0.18890633115814498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416110761","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99855584,0.00008304965,0.00012996113,0.000026616355,0.0000011290057,0.0000027650708,0.00009183943,0.000007251021,0.0011016303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996532,0.000022169252,0.00012865824,0.000009995743,0.0000013276331,0.0000013398526,0.000048362377,0.0000014280256,0.00013352772],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99977964,0.00004624871,0.000009898457,0.000058952177,0.000044952634,0.0000603716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984931,0.00033739363,0.0005087088,0.00010075783,0.00013711522,0.0004229512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021011475,0.000138346,0.00020939378,0.0005008846,0.00042718672,0.0006686332,0.00024090595,0.00014905464,0.0026079414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010232955,0.00010969347,0.00016914749,0.0003556191,0.0008409663,0.00029454264,0.0004793139,0.00024947073,0.000089183006],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036858927,0.00007653224,0.978323,0.00006859192,0.00017954034,0.00014185157,0.00016517867,0.0011500799,0.011743396,0.0002999892,0.00032285223,0.00716057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002916507,0.000022175042,0.9992279,0.0000052273513,0.000018459965,0.000030164092,0.00009290362,0.00024682467,0.0001423936,0.00008298144,0.00012652748,0.0000015849713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08949144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.298222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08949144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009287724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052840204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17794108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7081952627","doi":"10.1111/conl.13140","title":"Estimating Causal Impacts of Human Recreation on Wildlife in the Absence of Experimental Controls","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Recreation; Wildlife; Grizzly Bears; Causal inference; Ursus; Tourism; Human–wildlife conflict; Wildlife management; Fishing","score_opus":0.022819996892659143,"score_gpt":0.28456040770398794,"score_spread":0.2617404108113288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7081952627","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9019433,0.0010908517,0.08599597,0.001078015,0.00044564513,0.00073014875,0.0059197834,0.00036456902,0.0024316215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98699385,0.00010551196,0.009567566,0.0002049421,0.00008231892,0.00070345233,0.001722295,0.000015787095,0.0006041867],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9790172,0.015407794,0.0008317697,0.0035571686,0.000585808,0.0006003518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.725573,0.23529682,0.017760754,0.018651268,0.001731416,0.0009867386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041389268,0.0008058428,0.0009909341,0.0010318457,0.0009630458,0.0012902662,0.0017535473,0.001668134,0.0060171783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08377253,0.00061998254,0.0028956546,0.0010257951,0.002698375,0.0013043713,0.0012343792,0.0022722343,0.000327362],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011408717,0.0034202153,0.8166467,0.0012421078,0.012131499,0.0008676096,0.0005431669,0.08252519,0.0031018497,0.023156099,0.0043287617,0.04062813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039475593,0.009303481,0.53178155,0.00036760888,0.01000342,0.00043575605,0.0010994362,0.3484003,0.010117122,0.068550386,0.015716461,0.0002769683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015293272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007695618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041389268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013454184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016139592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21889001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7089775100","doi":"10.1111/conl.13152","title":"“Walk the Land, Before You Talk About the Land”: TEK‐Based Conservation Monitoring Invalidates Caribou Extirpation Status Assigned by British Columbia and Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Assembly of First Nations","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Subarctic climate; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Population; Conservation biology; Wildlife conservation; Population growth; Circumpolar star; Conservation status; Traditional knowledge","score_opus":0.011576575292592192,"score_gpt":0.2113595733357322,"score_spread":0.19978299804313998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7089775100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96791613,0.00029847363,0.00042554524,0.008196828,0.00009475378,0.000040567702,0.00032210554,0.000020962654,0.02268456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99382764,0.00016175071,0.00034399782,0.0012613,0.000009820387,0.00001432815,0.00010967367,0.00000918465,0.0042622807],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788433,0.0005255359,0.000084631916,0.00025840083,0.0007101921,0.0005370165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884616,0.0028189614,0.0012816057,0.00062717556,0.00560515,0.001205576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032560674,0.00014533958,0.00017418589,0.0010029246,0.009238052,0.0025780909,0.0016391698,0.0010399469,0.0031882809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018882146,0.00017419668,0.00011849451,0.0015876633,0.002780576,0.000698072,0.0014380505,0.0017504044,0.0002637156],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024525434,0.00014718637,0.8493712,0.00009244593,0.00006665531,0.0016317732,0.050076492,0.00043134863,0.0012036331,0.003104908,0.0313031,0.06232608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012075705,0.000054806816,0.81787807,0.0003423003,0.0000709715,0.00035754283,0.14594474,0.0022076103,0.0014685239,0.0012299952,0.03037369,0.0000596467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98361754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99536693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018704964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018704964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024198037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13571465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}