{"meta":{"query_hash":"376c58a9ce66","filters":{"venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel"},"cohort_total":556,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":556,"exported":556,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/376c58a9ce66","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Constitutional+Forum+%2F+Forum+constitutionnel"},"results":[{"id":"W100273848","doi":"10.21991/c9m377","title":"WESTERN CANADIAN NATIONALISM IN TRANSITION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nationalism; Transition (genetics); Political science; Politics; Law; Chemistry","score_opus":0.027297511568498016,"score_gpt":0.23491044764556393,"score_spread":0.2076129360770659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W100273848","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26879004,0.010103705,0.00039292834,0.083050594,0.00080008636,0.00006509108,0.0016717109,0.00007922842,0.63504666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8744925,0.003798942,0.0004977751,0.007890791,0.000101991245,0.000045053745,0.00045603677,0.00008089259,0.11263616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699354,0.000273193,0.00006543919,0.00023383685,0.0006368978,0.001797015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971124,0.00019909491,0.00011624705,0.000088727465,0.0011987214,0.0012847421],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017151004,0.00032349632,0.00044990605,0.0031078071,0.034704965,0.009361965,0.0013262155,0.0019922755,0.014221055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00299258,0.0002631407,0.00034278704,0.008338534,0.007830213,0.0019400303,0.0039920583,0.0034798225,0.0006060465],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016475716,0.00007197001,0.019219235,0.0001890742,0.00004378047,0.0007164449,0.13874787,0.00040621334,0.00047293372,0.58695483,0.20621768,0.0467952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026381924,0.000015091677,0.08580245,0.00029086514,0.000040109488,0.00013524888,0.12883736,0.00016997497,0.0001746354,0.0102152275,0.77419466,0.00009805318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9982614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99906415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16558622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16558622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20102829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9678017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1015631599","doi":"10.21991/c92q16","title":"CANADA: MODÈLE D’ÉTAT MULTICULTUREL POUR LE MONDE?","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.03318494311857943,"score_gpt":0.21093391466943623,"score_spread":0.17774897155085678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1015631599","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037715275,0.008195439,0.019974912,0.09557639,0.0008481985,0.0002653511,0.0010711359,0.00026210313,0.83609116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8349384,0.011536419,0.017459061,0.0075040855,0.00018168298,0.0003371016,0.00066667685,0.00019925884,0.12717733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966844,0.0010200898,0.000051534793,0.0004029782,0.0008613865,0.0009795654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99662626,0.00044622336,0.0001485433,0.00026936788,0.0013334817,0.0011762218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030411715,0.00080573687,0.00077060267,0.0021320425,0.016955351,0.015672099,0.0030158642,0.002957232,0.029227661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052903597,0.00039517885,0.0007140505,0.004964991,0.009747669,0.0076364805,0.007044177,0.0025263797,0.0019065993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065699125,0.000057943675,0.0054857074,0.00020642503,0.00004135594,0.000266637,0.0089698,0.003540213,0.00016778366,0.8895013,0.05229472,0.039402474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062694045,0.000059705275,0.005825994,0.0007391424,0.00007355831,0.00014846581,0.022109708,0.009680385,0.00019078246,0.27613667,0.68487704,0.000095818534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9496856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96381855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09760443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09760443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15359053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70817304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W10263817","doi":"10.21991/c9mh3v","title":"Can a Middle Ground be Found on Senate Numbers?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Allotment; Proportional representation; House of Commons; Representation (politics); Political science; Electoral system; Law; Public administration; Economics; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.07111907847055417,"score_gpt":0.28278464309977597,"score_spread":0.21166556462922181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W10263817","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008603713,0.009854812,0.005293074,0.5760285,0.022490134,0.000056449764,0.0013064435,0.0003474656,0.37601936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45828083,0.020246465,0.008931279,0.25469455,0.025421236,0.00070986105,0.0023725622,0.0011279191,0.22821529],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9833161,0.006607762,0.00093982514,0.0022644873,0.0043080645,0.0025636533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9677279,0.015184886,0.002413526,0.0038134407,0.008046376,0.0028138454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01946997,0.0015022677,0.0018902904,0.006580071,0.010055164,0.017037818,0.003258126,0.010132946,0.10690913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11028739,0.0010105011,0.00085099327,0.008393552,0.0189233,0.051793244,0.011754018,0.013114228,0.025875656],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011787726,0.000045255776,0.0014087778,0.00012365867,0.000020000785,0.000104190636,0.0014598293,0.00009711218,0.00009394025,0.70719725,0.23792091,0.051411245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032556145,0.000056061584,0.0022513198,0.0015640862,0.000023257888,0.00007855214,0.0035459602,0.00017344848,0.00027976793,0.21672243,0.77517515,0.00009735714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022916699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03030694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10690913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065014907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076737422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35764664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W106135499","doi":"10.21991/c9fh4p","title":"BURYING ROTHMAN: THE SUPREME COURT AND THE RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.026490083894995447,"score_gpt":0.26767407790958886,"score_spread":0.24118399401459342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W106135499","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043016944,0.013127233,0.00999514,0.683329,0.00223073,0.000048873426,0.00012412656,0.000048950667,0.24807899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86573046,0.002310646,0.003090322,0.09719921,0.0018237326,0.00014230095,0.000037432983,0.00009322557,0.029572608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98154205,0.010435847,0.000584676,0.00250098,0.0017184558,0.0032178839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97913367,0.014933606,0.0015883837,0.0016120406,0.0015958967,0.001136435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026533056,0.00055617763,0.0015376264,0.001200181,0.017948171,0.017950458,0.0037533664,0.044031292,0.0074744304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04574605,0.0009340144,0.001176334,0.001558447,0.0581714,0.018808465,0.008779341,0.039213646,0.0009876615],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009540946,0.0000068049644,0.000055877466,0.0000051840534,0.0000048580737,0.000050224608,0.0015496456,0.000047814,0.00003575302,0.9918968,0.0055350703,0.00080241327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049716175,0.000010534127,0.00018539463,0.00009057913,0.000015939053,0.00006868891,0.0016992954,0.00022856053,0.0001898786,0.9531639,0.04425655,0.000040846222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029322809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02924937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044031292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007830723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017993998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14032185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W106867426","doi":"10.21991/c9mx0v","title":"Whose Senate Is It Anyway?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Face (sociological concept); Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.02589503799294125,"score_gpt":0.28997136201504725,"score_spread":0.264076324022106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W106867426","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016661778,0.009653407,0.002615728,0.4635176,0.00823151,0.00007546876,0.00087546214,0.00018701404,0.49818203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43133214,0.011843564,0.0028327876,0.16563453,0.0023145622,0.00016333286,0.00078188843,0.0004154436,0.3846817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920455,0.0033692727,0.00018610379,0.0007193312,0.0012549978,0.0024246909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944782,0.00040993612,0.00018221018,0.00033351354,0.002822319,0.0017738034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069963383,0.00032993752,0.0007758955,0.001124541,0.018819882,0.014189704,0.0011789382,0.0037176725,0.03500399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010305562,0.000375732,0.0004504154,0.002675841,0.009613741,0.0070218793,0.0031982134,0.006513359,0.0067898193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049078528,0.00003026081,0.004718886,0.00012872691,0.000044711276,0.00026744462,0.004912997,0.00010564095,0.00031730166,0.55409825,0.40552744,0.029799221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009473721,0.000009669228,0.003118504,0.00022869368,0.000020272357,0.00007905349,0.005872214,0.00004504659,0.000233911,0.0127585875,0.97757614,0.00004842865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5792221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.76072425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5792221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020015294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04846259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8465119},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W107393898","doi":"10.21991/c9q66t","title":"THE SUPREME COURT AND MANDATORY RETIREMENT: SANCTIONING THE STATUS QUO","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Status quo; Supreme court; Law; Status quo bias; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.02806588880401291,"score_gpt":0.21064987380225564,"score_spread":0.18258398499824274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W107393898","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.199445,0.0126163345,0.00727464,0.36020193,0.0040000617,0.00006886426,0.0002748109,0.000059401227,0.4160589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9609458,0.0011193723,0.00087594026,0.019994874,0.001546344,0.00006419937,0.00003647119,0.000026584949,0.015390418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98262435,0.007820983,0.00065051415,0.0014356477,0.002384598,0.0050839502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9722598,0.01942908,0.0022951008,0.0015774823,0.002404488,0.0020340157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021037282,0.00038447016,0.001024708,0.0012655328,0.013108311,0.011650533,0.0027647074,0.02329295,0.0071314625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049174335,0.0007232257,0.0008144078,0.0015977664,0.018787235,0.009878577,0.005298403,0.020488271,0.0006348768],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004402973,0.00004419068,0.0006172176,0.000019346413,0.000008811414,0.00008190806,0.002136514,0.00015089124,0.00010557732,0.9776673,0.014060246,0.0050639524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014690142,0.00009407062,0.0060211746,0.0005879358,0.00006538535,0.000113775095,0.0059899944,0.0016488485,0.00055818487,0.89942867,0.08521752,0.00012749633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034571476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.068684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034571476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073107844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022033194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.111257076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W107858588","doi":"10.21991/c90m39","title":"Canada’s Neglected Tradition of Coalition Government","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Governor; Government (linguistics); Fell; Politics; Government Office; Public administration; Political science; Core (optical fiber); Law; Local government; Computer science; Philosophy; Engineering; Geography","score_opus":0.021413804817183312,"score_gpt":0.20469795115256062,"score_spread":0.18328414633537732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W107858588","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014378372,0.00757989,0.0060991137,0.12777907,0.0015678772,0.00007099248,0.00036521535,0.0002108318,0.84194875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7314913,0.0068193143,0.0034659966,0.022537248,0.0003939663,0.00011714294,0.00013925284,0.0002655099,0.23477028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937748,0.0010508306,0.00009349048,0.0010708281,0.0022385512,0.0017715491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951154,0.0011541353,0.00018989797,0.00048102482,0.0014594744,0.0016000265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030891618,0.0004523758,0.00061579375,0.0021710466,0.02721454,0.013717997,0.0018188857,0.003759471,0.013319408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008415197,0.0005032588,0.00038687006,0.004790852,0.02300388,0.004301362,0.0037845243,0.0075848754,0.0009802156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011536946,0.000005465537,0.00026206157,0.000030907286,0.000004588481,0.000040080893,0.004430378,0.000140761,0.000031453495,0.9509328,0.035510793,0.008599125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017974166,0.000008948516,0.0011637445,0.00016213726,0.000007884726,0.00005361343,0.0028987261,0.00039845554,0.0000958268,0.06283079,0.93232983,0.000032021886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9840009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9909184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8315742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16842577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22575806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96450824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W108103023","doi":"10.21991/c9166m","title":"THE ISRAELI CONSTITUTIONAL REVOLUTION: THE CANADIAN IMPACT IN THE MIDST OF A FORMATIVE PERIOD","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Formative assessment; Period (music); Political science; Economic history; Law; History; Sociology; Philosophy; Pedagogy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.0424974356862031,"score_gpt":0.2877173947549372,"score_spread":0.2452199590687341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W108103023","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1181594,0.027517596,0.00048409792,0.29626527,0.0018506435,0.00009991197,0.0014228123,0.00009039768,0.5541099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89693165,0.01455413,0.0008406039,0.024877027,0.0005145607,0.00005558376,0.00040897186,0.000109386485,0.06170817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992492,0.0006831534,0.000097177326,0.0003916467,0.0028509088,0.003485184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910766,0.0016400482,0.0003740153,0.0002406051,0.0042887838,0.002379888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005464642,0.00046041975,0.0008381164,0.004077714,0.036862217,0.02079305,0.0020901333,0.0048560738,0.013120098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015840745,0.00044562708,0.00053571083,0.007871964,0.018517852,0.0045822305,0.0045698737,0.009252054,0.00041394777],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002340441,0.00006312177,0.0050734305,0.00014936384,0.00003283771,0.0002813019,0.018039014,0.0005168538,0.00034819165,0.84304196,0.096943825,0.035276026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010203752,0.00003242852,0.0433299,0.00040475742,0.000051164956,0.000090232796,0.029179258,0.0005098277,0.0004914313,0.025020054,0.90063703,0.00015190995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99681723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99824476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36941049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.36941049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.33678913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73139447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W10830698","doi":"10.21991/c9bh3c","title":"DISABLING IMAGES AND THE DANGERS OF PUBLIC PERCEPTION: A COMMENTARY ON THE MEDIA’S \"COVERAGE\" OF THE LATIMER CASE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Media coverage; Computer science; Psychology; Media studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.04566106157659506,"score_gpt":0.26435581410797127,"score_spread":0.2186947525313762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W10830698","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020339491,0.0060976483,0.00024011738,0.9596151,0.0078612175,0.000010484447,0.00003329917,0.000014982199,0.02409322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08373612,0.0041399235,0.00029278587,0.86391336,0.032619808,0.00013497667,0.000027075568,0.00013148728,0.015004539],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9716832,0.011932828,0.0016999115,0.0025983346,0.0069146343,0.005171098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8791532,0.10575397,0.0043074214,0.0019220981,0.006580547,0.0022827592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020743264,0.0013974758,0.0024446747,0.0036950447,0.0299498,0.02125201,0.0089029055,0.13065532,0.008999265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08898503,0.0015832967,0.0026896913,0.0029113228,0.055772733,0.019934848,0.015871832,0.0820005,0.0015610728],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012692813,0.000048913316,0.00027939197,0.00045609905,0.000034649227,0.0011076566,0.03779349,0.000110712164,0.0003372863,0.3590557,0.59152627,0.009122799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011360211,0.00003824538,0.0010198121,0.0028594437,0.00010893442,0.00040626802,0.021715,0.00018661603,0.0009347655,0.044889648,0.92757297,0.000154692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06928689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0688619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13065532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015758552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015686559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1377672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W108443798","doi":"10.21991/c9jd4k","title":"THE SUPREME COURT ENTRENCHES PARLIAMENTARY PRIVILEGE OUT OF THE CHARTER'S REACH: DONOHOE V. CBC","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Privilege (computing); Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04460770952854883,"score_gpt":0.2600284529136868,"score_spread":0.21542074338513797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W108443798","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09940754,0.005191974,0.001651358,0.18308675,0.0016246951,0.00006160464,0.00024472136,0.0000426384,0.7086886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88161147,0.0011598308,0.0005408394,0.07786014,0.0005954064,0.000089653375,0.000057521043,0.000037895505,0.03804738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98458004,0.0046268706,0.0005125524,0.001574823,0.0046122703,0.0040935096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985727,0.010335498,0.00074235286,0.00054826174,0.0015126244,0.0011342448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011140771,0.00030954392,0.0011094476,0.0019725675,0.01639245,0.012391444,0.0016669505,0.016313126,0.0045647854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037589405,0.00064914796,0.0006887593,0.001754734,0.015381286,0.0040225545,0.0053101773,0.015567737,0.0005691883],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055099914,0.000024460724,0.000955736,0.00003536801,0.000012378784,0.00031263242,0.004719301,0.0000878833,0.00044616143,0.9565718,0.032100283,0.004678801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026674184,0.00014834304,0.014516309,0.0009425468,0.00018811265,0.00039500315,0.009405436,0.00063800847,0.0029009543,0.3338268,0.6365345,0.00023717023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23052785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28482318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7694721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012483961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026271265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45837206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W109278735","doi":"10.21991/c9z079","title":"COULD THE MEECH LAKE ACCORD AFFECT THE PROTECTION OF EQUALITY RIGHTS FOR WOMEN AND MINORITIES IN CANADA?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Political science; Gender equality; Environmental protection; Public administration; Socioeconomics; Environmental planning; Geography; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.056049261806597354,"score_gpt":0.28504674326278334,"score_spread":0.22899748145618598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W109278735","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17691061,0.0036212504,0.002000474,0.4401201,0.0022773864,0.00034594967,0.0009225659,0.000092472925,0.37370917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6946717,0.0017485849,0.0023977577,0.15771873,0.00047666577,0.00028172915,0.00015821263,0.00006314828,0.14248347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9791901,0.0022037365,0.0004284368,0.001170712,0.005483523,0.011523552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882783,0.0033698983,0.0006356882,0.00047688233,0.003707963,0.0035311715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010813123,0.0006291667,0.0010562934,0.0020351657,0.036563084,0.015552362,0.0041784365,0.02169121,0.012105876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028825488,0.0011764236,0.0015919768,0.0022605667,0.013532417,0.004947641,0.006391672,0.016317703,0.0006399223],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017569368,0.00014563254,0.008306428,0.00010952623,0.00009200499,0.0006875938,0.0101492815,0.001330046,0.0012284332,0.9029133,0.059449196,0.015412914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000882616,0.00021900075,0.08886681,0.0009397603,0.00043930588,0.00027978225,0.029315297,0.004449767,0.0035746817,0.16463158,0.7052628,0.0011385641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9921278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9955646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.113363355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.113363355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29955733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82251257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W110045794","doi":"10.21991/c9095z","title":"THE LEGACY OF THE REFERENDUM: WHO ARE WE NOW?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.056520600191823304,"score_gpt":0.28132576366818035,"score_spread":0.22480516347635704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W110045794","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02365862,0.031724717,0.0072681876,0.72271425,0.006693377,0.000027482141,0.00009950112,0.000069459136,0.20774439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83967906,0.018933987,0.0035472822,0.08431648,0.008621475,0.000096689044,0.00015969934,0.00026541462,0.04437985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98626757,0.00805919,0.0004048216,0.0015515297,0.0019954513,0.0017214502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828182,0.0077368896,0.0017216641,0.0020552515,0.0029981888,0.002669805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024672015,0.00046495636,0.0012009284,0.0022287767,0.016710343,0.024873374,0.002562501,0.010939155,0.011911384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03529999,0.00051824516,0.0005163594,0.0030912536,0.05523946,0.048383962,0.009440128,0.018594302,0.001709644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013297871,0.000033227578,0.00057855115,0.000056897403,0.000007763321,0.00009128514,0.029730903,0.000029878867,0.000073598836,0.93574595,0.017857298,0.01578134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015939486,0.000024073368,0.00089438044,0.00049168745,0.000016018437,0.00013687393,0.033891138,0.00008564749,0.00016632785,0.5648949,0.39934224,0.000040846317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014260777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014261688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98573923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0086614555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016422454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13047963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W112197869","doi":"10.21991/c9xt0m","title":"THOUGHTS ON CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS RECOGNIZING AN INHERENT ABORIGINAL RIGHT TO SELF-GOVERNMENT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Constitutional right; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Psychology; Sociology; Linguistics; Constitution; Philosophy","score_opus":0.044421854086359736,"score_gpt":0.30768330344413425,"score_spread":0.2632614493577745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W112197869","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028815785,0.0067090006,0.008966455,0.3159602,0.010006521,0.00014463013,0.00013522692,0.000071517745,0.6291906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63638777,0.004852351,0.009859935,0.18334624,0.010585811,0.00045609358,0.000088618144,0.00018145046,0.15424177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9811013,0.0066834274,0.001065756,0.0023833609,0.004637877,0.0041283946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98713696,0.00886668,0.0006406833,0.0010863182,0.0018186646,0.00045074924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021909736,0.00064648385,0.0012570986,0.0022506681,0.019877646,0.015301533,0.0052496376,0.031557474,0.0062177326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025022099,0.0012955411,0.0019925465,0.0018763446,0.057823583,0.011585508,0.0060820975,0.04662589,0.0011048918],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000412153,0.0000051401785,0.000014596605,0.000015351476,0.0000028973045,0.000077594515,0.0044555,0.0000385089,0.00009526991,0.99109846,0.0036357238,0.0005567354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005213186,0.00003227761,0.00045957076,0.00034639458,0.000046826342,0.00018969177,0.008842312,0.00020088343,0.00080009503,0.7315956,0.25733933,0.00009496268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.066517964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07402945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9863372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01366281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011080936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13226151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1134862121","doi":"10.21991/c9mq15","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada Long-Gun Registry Decision: The Constitutional Question Behind an Intergovernmental Relations Failure","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Institutions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Repeal; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Government (linguistics); Gun control; Parliament; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.014586215470886782,"score_gpt":0.22430315767289707,"score_spread":0.2097169422020103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1134862121","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06572951,0.004832165,0.004226297,0.4217965,0.0038909456,0.00057404366,0.0032749898,0.00030210163,0.4953735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56166136,0.0019294462,0.003429698,0.21313582,0.0012270682,0.00044338426,0.0009685216,0.00017994839,0.21702474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9682028,0.002461411,0.0008623367,0.0039832885,0.012863382,0.011626718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98050267,0.0067793084,0.0005222655,0.0012631447,0.0078267995,0.003105823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01876975,0.0008741328,0.0013790433,0.0024713695,0.04008683,0.02695442,0.0075216293,0.028357424,0.008132236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036578,0.0016838242,0.001660298,0.004380533,0.01687472,0.00487856,0.004973434,0.029090421,0.0011538018],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051535215,0.00004088834,0.0013236463,0.000030103027,0.000033178574,0.00038422432,0.0023663351,0.00037,0.00036755487,0.85545474,0.1349702,0.00460756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003148883,0.000071860966,0.0094486,0.0004926421,0.00022971156,0.00017151787,0.005794859,0.0032089595,0.0016012146,0.10082515,0.87732357,0.0005170098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9810401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98472047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14736284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14736284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29299784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9889383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W113985439","doi":"10.21991/c9j37m","title":"THE TRICKSTER: INTEGRAL TO A DISTINCTIVE CULTURE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Museums and Cultural Heritage","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trickster; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.04329065382207777,"score_gpt":0.22762542314450485,"score_spread":0.18433476932242707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W113985439","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.075667806,0.0020944406,0.008877919,0.084409006,0.0011973161,0.00005428099,0.00004504071,0.00010439691,0.8275499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.949176,0.00027377185,0.0014801957,0.008056173,0.00027886895,0.00006580853,0.000014579575,0.000106814216,0.04054769],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906837,0.0042371172,0.00028479585,0.0011818123,0.0013778344,0.0022346773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992486,0.0024407979,0.0005511158,0.0011544267,0.00089970656,0.0024680484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00644046,0.00036458744,0.00064544345,0.0013786816,0.028371781,0.024320683,0.0018334386,0.009161706,0.0087692095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009290558,0.0005572572,0.00042729647,0.0011968736,0.11917061,0.017398098,0.01695575,0.015614788,0.0009631948],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072980106,0.000010882117,0.00018074976,0.000007687811,0.000002553973,0.00008557848,0.024080526,0.000017891445,0.000083343875,0.96867955,0.004072903,0.002771137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023843391,0.000026464182,0.0009375852,0.000120900026,0.000014904968,0.00039259007,0.05278285,0.00013301146,0.00036066826,0.7063574,0.23878841,0.00006139959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010491457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014646983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028371781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061368905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012497777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044526517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W114007849","doi":"10.21991/c90h2w","title":"NAFTA AND THE CONSTITUTION: DOES LABOUR CONVENTIONS REALLY MATTER ANY MORE?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Business; Labour economics; Economics","score_opus":0.016465284319378486,"score_gpt":0.2596079918824726,"score_spread":0.24314270756309408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W114007849","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02566432,0.016234815,0.0017644138,0.6633738,0.003896966,0.000028297976,0.00051180896,0.000058261758,0.28846732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70869005,0.009086014,0.0016851525,0.21081954,0.0061729443,0.00030625437,0.0005225016,0.00015494438,0.06256258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9809498,0.008539625,0.0007668886,0.002040031,0.0036961297,0.0040074857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986395,0.009051354,0.001585804,0.0008997494,0.0013153285,0.00075275236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016361242,0.00050155947,0.0013940864,0.0018537395,0.010877299,0.01612141,0.0020707105,0.02466572,0.013623424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034471195,0.00059689576,0.0010427003,0.0041255374,0.016808769,0.016716119,0.004011421,0.015003884,0.0017757914],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030805713,0.000028197317,0.000528293,0.000040968407,0.000018644472,0.000034402954,0.0012703742,0.00007994655,0.00007934006,0.967324,0.026094615,0.0044703204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001111299,0.000038902228,0.005641452,0.0006305865,0.0000619858,0.000044005552,0.003498749,0.00027736917,0.00024432765,0.6296188,0.3597342,0.00009852101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06298915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0674931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06298915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011810967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020842886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12524503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W114225910","doi":"10.21991/c94t0g","title":"THE ARBOUR RECORD","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Maritime and Coastal Archaeology","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geology","score_opus":0.03772589759735826,"score_gpt":0.2110348782756737,"score_spread":0.17330898067831543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W114225910","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032915848,0.011079516,0.001993553,0.096266754,0.021049403,0.000047015787,0.0015823167,0.00049017795,0.86419964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03736292,0.0034384294,0.0008575366,0.017909376,0.0044402056,0.000052562402,0.0009547163,0.00057256076,0.9344117],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99315083,0.0013444622,0.00024470597,0.0008900308,0.0032176455,0.0011522727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911737,0.0024184764,0.0005562761,0.0022066268,0.0027940674,0.00085091573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004666633,0.00038029125,0.0006785907,0.0030467962,0.011884241,0.020917198,0.0018849048,0.0055855876,0.09477655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023528403,0.00075339014,0.00039591017,0.0045467913,0.0051075444,0.008519266,0.004647339,0.009893283,0.03319845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000406005,0.000014497084,0.0002281117,0.000061031158,0.000005078802,0.000071514725,0.0006148444,0.00003203822,0.00013016368,0.24259418,0.72921693,0.02699107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021295518,0.000001910878,0.00013797023,0.000046978686,0.00000125306,0.000012979899,0.00017428835,0.000015275009,0.00006075164,0.0033536234,0.9961869,0.0000058815076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04663718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07082136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09477655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006191992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009397805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3170591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W115428265","doi":"10.21991/c9sq23","title":"THE MEECH LAKE ACCORD AND THE FUTURE OF THE WELFARE STATE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Historical Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Welfare; Welfare state; Environmental science; Environmental planning; Political science; Computer science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.019807050017502294,"score_gpt":0.19003900365505405,"score_spread":0.17023195363755175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W115428265","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06346688,0.010282148,0.003271631,0.26776674,0.0012125585,0.000024872621,0.00017238598,0.00003945595,0.65376335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88348955,0.0033403728,0.00087029533,0.01752523,0.0014587555,0.00011502473,0.00008343262,0.0000420677,0.093075156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99678314,0.0012984485,0.000061386236,0.00026442503,0.0005750196,0.0010175285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896383,0.0003949467,0.00013638206,0.00010108239,0.00015379615,0.00025002626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032808539,0.00027715653,0.0003844742,0.0009826678,0.008284842,0.013454782,0.000890881,0.009467993,0.009903752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062544215,0.0003719545,0.0004398295,0.0014771656,0.011327519,0.010896513,0.0056027574,0.00834406,0.00061791786],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010670312,0.00000590919,0.000074634394,0.000003221871,8.7212106e-7,0.00001894166,0.00023857714,0.00014132599,0.000016364198,0.99290484,0.0052660676,0.0013185412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002325528,0.000012603226,0.0011484253,0.000078910394,0.0000037412224,0.00003387911,0.0010360485,0.00047817273,0.000053901327,0.8512646,0.14584135,0.000025161266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021085663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032434992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.991834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008166013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007778479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059248865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W11616365","doi":"10.21991/c9s084","title":"FURTHER RESTRICTINGS ON ACCESS TO CHARTER REVIEW: A COMMENT ON HY AND ZEL'S INC. V. ONTARIO (A.G.)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.06074538259970911,"score_gpt":0.3081228134511146,"score_spread":0.24737743085140548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W11616365","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026458192,0.0021477253,0.00048748622,0.9307398,0.0051392606,0.0001843921,0.002017353,0.00022792043,0.056410268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012346883,0.0009773342,0.00061203627,0.9485889,0.0025515296,0.0002253634,0.00026497408,0.000057721234,0.034375254],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9751058,0.0018331148,0.0022378087,0.0024238504,0.011869146,0.0065304185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9583605,0.019146508,0.0025437165,0.0018792285,0.012993675,0.005076376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013525524,0.0014426393,0.0020623195,0.0019061265,0.017962692,0.008461543,0.010945812,0.13123886,0.01373949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04163212,0.0028505533,0.004052571,0.003294667,0.011351499,0.0046725967,0.0044103353,0.043927945,0.0060143075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005192207,0.000023787008,0.0009420267,0.00009425869,0.000020923126,0.00042161712,0.0013860121,0.0000859499,0.0005914968,0.017135141,0.9772086,0.0020381773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034581101,0.00005930709,0.013024146,0.00061736937,0.00016819875,0.00030582421,0.0017958027,0.00036561795,0.0007381995,0.0050801416,0.9772066,0.00029302033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88339627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9420842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13123886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048980642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.109591275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35538107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W116455860","doi":"10.21991/c98h3r","title":"THE CHARTER’S BURDENS: THE RETURN TO THE \"PRESUMPTION OF VALIDITY\" IN SECTION 7 OF THE CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Presumption; Political science; Section (typography); Law; Law and economics; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.04946066497352069,"score_gpt":0.2699278153999215,"score_spread":0.2204671504264008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W116455860","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014039635,0.0056618997,0.016910564,0.50263083,0.005519413,0.00021230697,0.00090657506,0.00018670368,0.45393205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51568025,0.005342772,0.032983672,0.29209092,0.006106763,0.00059980096,0.0008420801,0.0007441965,0.14560947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8747009,0.023733709,0.0051231696,0.010062355,0.07102827,0.015351513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8957339,0.040993776,0.0034204305,0.0077469996,0.04660412,0.0055006696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.057831116,0.00113551,0.0022559382,0.0037540295,0.032297503,0.025191506,0.009834196,0.02991304,0.009712429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13462807,0.0024689152,0.0023291993,0.0037982191,0.05800484,0.013427194,0.008815187,0.046264645,0.0013764467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014435454,0.000012470918,0.00020398696,0.000029982153,0.000010430877,0.00004073639,0.0024392656,0.00024382351,0.000091263675,0.9447653,0.048573337,0.0035749124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011764877,0.00003166725,0.0037869336,0.00081541244,0.00009694614,0.00010406944,0.0032080598,0.0017185762,0.00057279697,0.5176945,0.47135806,0.0004953643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9580665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95212954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12379777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12379777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29451334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8982199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W118142628","doi":"10.21991/c99q2r","title":"ROCKET V. ROYAL COLLEGE OF DENTAL SURGEONS OF ONTARIO: PROFESSIONAL ADVERTISING AND THE LIMITS OF REGULATION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Rocket (weapon); Aeronautics; Medicine; Political science; Advertising; Medical education; Engineering; Business","score_opus":0.04837147989743538,"score_gpt":0.3362318202368766,"score_spread":0.2878603403394412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W118142628","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020082695,0.010655807,0.001184546,0.32279414,0.0018247582,0.00018045658,0.0011011262,0.00014106165,0.6420354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3787352,0.008062254,0.0021314498,0.21254587,0.0019327614,0.00033129472,0.00040820363,0.0001384116,0.39571443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9820042,0.0018820326,0.0009899604,0.0009325057,0.009733052,0.004458179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9816822,0.009653634,0.0011504163,0.00081827043,0.0047969413,0.0018985808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008928266,0.0005238948,0.0006793604,0.0013878411,0.015795974,0.011286344,0.0029363113,0.032596067,0.009823661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02499735,0.0016447854,0.0011075569,0.0023168935,0.010766254,0.0035109194,0.0022990152,0.013356544,0.0019300046],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105880616,0.000046551166,0.00256605,0.00017580259,0.000026373698,0.0007356381,0.0062083323,0.00030118058,0.0013939278,0.5295711,0.44881728,0.010051786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020581215,0.000039944305,0.019576838,0.00055288273,0.00008932449,0.00026279278,0.0032429926,0.00041400356,0.0006997896,0.029344361,0.94532096,0.0002503338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9273966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96957445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.072603405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04399935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.102969006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31923914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1203575969","doi":"10.21991/c97h56","title":"Analysis of Reference re Supreme Court Act: The Implied Currency Requirement for Quebec Seat Appointees to the Supreme Court","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Original jurisdiction; Certiorari; Remand (court procedure); Sociology","score_opus":0.06428803097656172,"score_gpt":0.294797804616469,"score_spread":0.23050977363990727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1203575969","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0654062,0.00242789,0.004686924,0.026518043,0.00062407623,0.00026558927,0.0024276583,0.00010213467,0.8975415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8332173,0.0013448322,0.0030778626,0.009357161,0.00032091522,0.00030734233,0.0008388924,0.00009165843,0.15144391],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99209595,0.001454055,0.00023298882,0.0006969446,0.0032346556,0.0022854835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99082386,0.0037049772,0.00045116924,0.0004938666,0.0041283867,0.00039778143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005398373,0.0004977185,0.00049878826,0.004401891,0.016030727,0.011419847,0.002549884,0.0045761834,0.012893742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013343837,0.0005323021,0.0006106031,0.005180526,0.009421717,0.0026161529,0.0017598649,0.0067891376,0.0011119229],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000114131735,0.000014548,0.00070670113,0.000030782026,0.000003890402,0.00018504511,0.0055086724,0.00021519886,0.00021573393,0.97182184,0.018494742,0.0027913654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005013097,0.000056645968,0.029638914,0.0009264016,0.000105184845,0.00020118836,0.020894375,0.0020744326,0.0018251482,0.09225711,0.8517602,0.00021028513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92310625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9494865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91876614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.081233844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06444535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5893955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W12331922","doi":"10.21991/c9b67s","title":"LE RÉGIME TRUDEAU A-T-IL TRAHI LE RÉGIME DE 1867?","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.02312149742344567,"score_gpt":0.22436524608431274,"score_spread":0.20124374866086708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W12331922","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.071127124,0.011778909,0.0011093757,0.049990904,0.0013175865,0.000035635006,0.00026840944,0.000039750234,0.8643323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7109736,0.004171691,0.0006639239,0.005701637,0.00034275328,0.00003459025,0.00016278986,0.00008541516,0.2778636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99637514,0.00053255796,0.000055698838,0.00042306233,0.0008340819,0.0017794602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919873,0.0001521177,0.0000959269,0.00008588865,0.00028813703,0.00017926017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023095817,0.00032813943,0.00034982423,0.0011610156,0.010825309,0.007321777,0.0008855761,0.0028527703,0.012776582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036357571,0.0002599474,0.0003147709,0.0017587485,0.015780466,0.0037313693,0.0020127448,0.0044598314,0.0017976295],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031150696,0.000009795833,0.0010302151,0.0000371273,0.0000061260316,0.00008192929,0.0117237205,0.00007701272,0.00014213118,0.95694125,0.019371655,0.010547933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000101874875,0.00001774665,0.005651935,0.00014318491,0.000008511737,0.00005307876,0.00597951,0.00004994307,0.0003145909,0.016742554,0.9710042,0.000024584657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.53943807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.68093526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46056193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04939535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034754016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92654854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W125281486","doi":"10.21991/c9zq0w","title":"TREATY INDIGENOUS PEOPLES AND THE CHARLOTTETOWN ACCORD: THE MESSAGE IN THE BREEZE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Treaty; Political science; Geography; Law; Meteorology; Biology","score_opus":0.019949696067637714,"score_gpt":0.2271148590867824,"score_spread":0.20716516301914467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W125281486","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044470854,0.0139950365,0.00065057207,0.5712489,0.0044854167,0.000065426575,0.00017688777,0.000066416025,0.36484057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5006618,0.0036377534,0.0011103307,0.18149912,0.0019341726,0.00010911372,0.00007495457,0.000095831434,0.310877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929005,0.0012230173,0.00013404379,0.0005626032,0.0022200453,0.0029598912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961986,0.0014766314,0.00019737054,0.00020806205,0.0009969721,0.00092236284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059457878,0.00046640373,0.0008472557,0.0012702745,0.03914404,0.015226356,0.0029202742,0.024851235,0.009184278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014753296,0.00067395956,0.0005741926,0.0020359638,0.029762201,0.0047956677,0.0073458226,0.025651895,0.000600646],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045703,0.000027960152,0.00039200205,0.000077736004,0.00001197591,0.0002011214,0.017372051,0.000115184004,0.00025772632,0.88015413,0.095595874,0.0057486068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007447513,0.000024146482,0.0049380925,0.00040776853,0.000032132626,0.000090552894,0.018287236,0.00017535446,0.0002725879,0.065759204,0.9098053,0.00013325272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9276238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9548654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07237619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057033185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10570719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41380662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W128508422","doi":"10.21991/c9tt0p","title":"UNSTABLE FOUNDING: PQ ASSUMPTIONS AND THE INDEPENDENCE PROJECT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Mathematical economics; Political science; Economics; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.2382538064546714,"score_gpt":0.39231243156712975,"score_spread":0.15405862511245835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W128508422","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07464477,0.0010257261,0.66011506,0.02394212,0.000538776,0.0004343562,0.00025216525,0.000114161994,0.23893294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9438186,0.0003938571,0.043606944,0.0012048522,0.00039522102,0.0005133373,0.00012817448,0.0000869269,0.009852115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97780335,0.010703557,0.0011403775,0.0028683525,0.005219896,0.0022645355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8859009,0.080524914,0.0054193316,0.013430646,0.012058354,0.0026658522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032325596,0.00077143987,0.0020224229,0.0029867725,0.006706032,0.0070172856,0.003318981,0.0045421883,0.010450045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.121154785,0.0009462067,0.0024620618,0.0031956744,0.025232255,0.02022774,0.007871496,0.01398521,0.00081664114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025077989,0.00001896099,0.00021697283,0.000016165737,0.0000073362116,0.000045199697,0.00024832418,0.0006461166,0.000029199877,0.9948797,0.00077696436,0.0030900056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013218527,0.000005522033,0.00009377985,0.0000112627995,0.0000037264697,0.000022126862,0.00005350906,0.0015679459,0.00004452493,0.997523,0.00065638835,0.0000051004213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035647661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002083868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032325596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045417245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00590757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17095613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W131250926","doi":"10.21991/c94h3h","title":"Charter Rights and Public Policy Choices: The Supreme Court and Public Finance","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Appeal; Supreme court; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Political science; Health care; Public policy; Law","score_opus":0.03605101082084554,"score_gpt":0.2613519510641108,"score_spread":0.22530094024326525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W131250926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029550262,0.013505808,0.0047386363,0.3652228,0.0008992518,0.00007397809,0.00039680614,0.000068108275,0.58554435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92106783,0.005225651,0.001658352,0.03381626,0.0012217716,0.00010580001,0.00015312212,0.00006244416,0.036688782],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98399854,0.0039426,0.00026372797,0.0013265734,0.00531912,0.0051494045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879645,0.0071609993,0.00061017857,0.00089556933,0.002093455,0.0012753346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01747314,0.0004316978,0.0008367235,0.0026907953,0.020160869,0.022380343,0.0028525519,0.013880902,0.008274759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031461567,0.00057570345,0.00065516075,0.004263851,0.049416006,0.007186898,0.0040752958,0.013487689,0.00041943157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023043654,0.0000031175236,0.00008449634,0.0000032837238,0.0000013354664,0.000012145115,0.00025006116,0.00014711289,0.0000069167795,0.993737,0.004889348,0.0008627809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004769324,0.00000701311,0.001249246,0.0002048392,0.000012196254,0.000018914858,0.0014306315,0.00094604783,0.00007283803,0.878675,0.11729013,0.0000453682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7845634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.77332366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9075929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09240709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10070684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67046356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W131980456","doi":"10.21991/c9s09h","title":"Constitutional Change to Address Climate Change and Nonrenewable Energy Use","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kyoto Protocol; Climate change; Greenhouse gas; Per capita; Politics; Natural resource economics; Political science; Sign (mathematics); Economy; Political economy; Economics; Law; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.23752094771088336,"score_gpt":0.26082706898147345,"score_spread":0.02330612127059009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W131980456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04031424,0.008580759,0.03193982,0.23979442,0.0080930935,0.00037018093,0.0008496236,0.00033676313,0.6697211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83618695,0.0035218562,0.013992953,0.06641173,0.0047155833,0.0005192955,0.0005706697,0.0001360701,0.07394487],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889415,0.0038134558,0.00054855243,0.0009807312,0.0040761204,0.0016396801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856958,0.0067526624,0.001443696,0.002530976,0.002327286,0.0012496066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018329063,0.00039656725,0.00041758578,0.0011187467,0.004990351,0.0063006314,0.0019272995,0.00952062,0.01229815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042906884,0.00028886768,0.0006177194,0.0012442572,0.0065363413,0.0065472806,0.0036047758,0.007998755,0.0016506228],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064684405,0.000029401386,0.00032427645,0.000017145554,0.000005140503,0.000022514763,0.0002320558,0.00029861924,0.00019146256,0.9780473,0.014421787,0.006403946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050737126,0.000055388402,0.00198317,0.00022613053,0.000019886043,0.0000912102,0.00040440424,0.000987998,0.00061103737,0.50773054,0.48779005,0.000049444294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007913488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074487072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018329063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044822656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011318363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09693456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W132384125","doi":"10.21991/c9dw92","title":"UNDERSTANDING LAW AND RELIGION AS CULTURE: MAKING ROOM FOR MEANING IN THE PUBLIC SPHERE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Salient; Meaning (existential); Politics; Sociology; Public sphere; Institution; Law; Public space; Political science; Social science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.12048597295882865,"score_gpt":0.3147839888293185,"score_spread":0.19429801587048987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W132384125","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23840132,0.009142193,0.012250913,0.21068817,0.0009459883,0.000043201282,0.00008908532,0.000058784066,0.5283803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931549,0.0012491253,0.0006937025,0.0022213357,0.00014719831,0.00001965697,0.000011461208,0.00002070294,0.0024820475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908949,0.0072028995,0.00011487347,0.00031081928,0.0006763501,0.00080023287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99328125,0.0044622687,0.00058602775,0.00047242487,0.0004769088,0.0007210657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006675574,0.00037914864,0.0004731928,0.0023752328,0.0144703295,0.020262977,0.0019532375,0.0041065696,0.0044243983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009480016,0.00030763043,0.00036620867,0.0025910076,0.08376793,0.02145219,0.0074686245,0.006910668,0.00039609196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009324805,0.000021350965,0.00088821247,0.000036121215,0.0000037615523,0.00011143236,0.19395803,0.000098773235,0.00010410934,0.79783845,0.0017809006,0.005149638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001898401,0.000027044553,0.0017397739,0.00031599627,0.000011673936,0.00013307417,0.3270523,0.00047849762,0.00021940566,0.5822314,0.087745614,0.000026348118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02042149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022790791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02042149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009457573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075876643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06861985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W134432849","doi":"10.21991/c9xh3n","title":"COVENANT CONSTITUTIONALISM AND THE CANADA ASSISTANCE PLAN","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Constitutionalism; Plan (archaeology); Political science; Public administration; Law; Geography; Politics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.05098320338001189,"score_gpt":0.26579905349256344,"score_spread":0.21481585011255155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W134432849","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049060084,0.0067307986,0.0016499488,0.19075812,0.0006232601,0.00017523048,0.0012177811,0.00010328379,0.7496815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6481785,0.004192944,0.002444073,0.04256815,0.00039759927,0.00024583912,0.0004918506,0.00014446859,0.30133656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9863745,0.0015664072,0.00022154977,0.00087712926,0.0041214386,0.0068389666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894024,0.002631113,0.00044051756,0.0004072583,0.0038998933,0.0032187395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005827381,0.0006018941,0.0009032987,0.0029924717,0.029860392,0.018400665,0.0031537497,0.010893527,0.020335192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019753983,0.0012383196,0.0009229309,0.0046595596,0.01558748,0.004327954,0.0060574817,0.013288973,0.00093757675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028737246,0.000021036272,0.0008346057,0.000020846963,0.000013830384,0.000072868184,0.0011512341,0.00054777367,0.000056799287,0.95318526,0.04056453,0.0035024579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001969641,0.000030889776,0.015799254,0.00041727177,0.000108699554,0.00007651661,0.006006995,0.002202903,0.00031735978,0.24297985,0.7316016,0.00026163686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99547076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99740183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7918487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2081513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.39130613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91843224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W13683040","doi":"10.21991/c9k389","title":"Reflections on the Kitchen Accord","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Negotiation; Maturity (psychological); Political science; Point (geometry); Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.07221261619120004,"score_gpt":0.364798395714988,"score_spread":0.29258577952378795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W13683040","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009779133,0.0075503187,0.0006913632,0.5030358,0.0044863806,0.000011473401,0.00006716145,0.000039071423,0.47433934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36614254,0.0035770033,0.00054064934,0.23112558,0.0019554354,0.0000690969,0.000055096632,0.00019967051,0.3963349],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950983,0.001794681,0.000055815897,0.00050278904,0.0010146283,0.0015337704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99744654,0.0012376427,0.00007633651,0.00017000921,0.0005611307,0.0005084343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038025337,0.0003549473,0.00037643217,0.0005163892,0.017862067,0.013099949,0.0018596132,0.0118847955,0.029231112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010087096,0.00033327687,0.00038439393,0.0010183647,0.019056562,0.0072612856,0.0060079596,0.017113864,0.003884041],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026014088,0.000013777927,0.0001684091,0.000032598935,0.0000034990412,0.00022005949,0.010438909,0.00014717311,0.00007267271,0.72060776,0.26053298,0.0077361506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009170226,0.000007701321,0.00050611584,0.00018082027,0.0000029487558,0.00006328802,0.016136222,0.00009942892,0.000121949786,0.07232182,0.91053104,0.000019418258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15273476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25898603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15273476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013435933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012643128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3036915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W138050343","doi":"10.21991/c94x0h","title":"THE WITHERING OF THE STATE?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Indian History and Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Political science; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.03742378643544827,"score_gpt":0.19267902631207995,"score_spread":0.15525523987663167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W138050343","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022511149,0.01109094,0.0044912673,0.4144667,0.0043945317,0.000023498254,0.00006590858,0.000081825405,0.54287416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8797086,0.0035716388,0.0011334504,0.03560277,0.0030500926,0.000050610666,0.000032476964,0.00009968715,0.076750726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99357456,0.0033478593,0.00012747373,0.0006943133,0.00083299325,0.0014228544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995723,0.0017743375,0.00033484146,0.0009306577,0.00058220996,0.00065487664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075755455,0.00032955993,0.0006514902,0.0010926968,0.012607735,0.015707063,0.0012781591,0.009250804,0.013649226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013752847,0.0003592236,0.0005100374,0.001580714,0.05182264,0.028111659,0.0050850958,0.013255426,0.0012494071],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005111582,0.0000050204603,0.00003974188,0.0000063647003,0.00000102853,0.000014411439,0.0014201798,0.000025140349,0.000019780118,0.9913396,0.0050495933,0.0020740503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010792895,0.000012192953,0.0003149514,0.0001038048,0.0000058813907,0.00006191396,0.0060731787,0.00018085896,0.00016228072,0.77132,0.22173047,0.000023721654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0168237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014905628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0168237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007664779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012638764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055612147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W140057180","doi":"10.21991/c9hw90","title":"SCIENTIFIC EXPERIMENTS ON ANIMALS AND CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Legislature; Subject (documents); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.2293077710516838,"score_gpt":0.38579427773632685,"score_spread":0.15648650668464306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W140057180","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018299736,0.0048356913,0.042409066,0.115535825,0.0024281712,0.0003731085,0.0002653618,0.00011438882,0.8157387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73711884,0.005025848,0.05033356,0.0944954,0.0047863466,0.0024805076,0.00031148724,0.00014146492,0.10530652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96599054,0.015402439,0.0019392594,0.0040171007,0.009852712,0.0027980516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9728592,0.02003346,0.0012661838,0.0028601266,0.0021709262,0.0008100462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.047426708,0.0006335368,0.0009768403,0.0013850617,0.010096832,0.007547009,0.002393774,0.016850056,0.0064619067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04367198,0.000681513,0.0009313612,0.0011830357,0.05107088,0.007907897,0.006292555,0.01378464,0.0010811172],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039866604,0.000007802376,0.000038331462,0.000010314559,0.0000013688995,0.000020859185,0.00029096717,0.000046688485,0.000075819175,0.9973024,0.0012720297,0.000929361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050213923,0.00005861976,0.0004292586,0.00019510796,0.000014463346,0.00009529282,0.00035426553,0.00027280106,0.00035546644,0.87615,0.12198925,0.00003533813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00944752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0114198895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047426708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055928202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0126816435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25081944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W141809283","doi":"10.21991/c90669","title":"JUDGING THE JUDGES: CANADA’S NEWEST SUPREME COURT JUDGE: HON. MICHEL BASTARACHE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Michel foucault; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.04030804881258754,"score_gpt":0.2551855852914567,"score_spread":0.21487753647886915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W141809283","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003423201,0.038569536,0.0009598022,0.8105469,0.018807063,0.00013359361,0.0006765648,0.00011713331,0.12676623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13212276,0.022184566,0.0034848598,0.27950755,0.007707438,0.00015459418,0.00045475143,0.00028104277,0.5541024],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929212,0.00078828115,0.00016718359,0.00067719014,0.0040825773,0.0013636692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98662496,0.0019226557,0.0002143766,0.00013727535,0.008508512,0.002592195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058137416,0.0006695904,0.0009063157,0.0019167911,0.026624652,0.0103832465,0.0023718963,0.008870957,0.010544204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016683625,0.0008361147,0.00042528132,0.0019871187,0.005737521,0.0026114562,0.0015363488,0.015419738,0.0029226895],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011630124,0.000007882818,0.0003356405,0.000020742194,0.000005450254,0.00008112112,0.00058404537,0.0000721308,0.000120760895,0.018271297,0.9753084,0.0051808907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029904146,0.000007604152,0.003723119,0.00020552907,0.000021860302,0.000067614514,0.0024597284,0.00023910464,0.0003283199,0.006329474,0.98651576,0.00007193335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.964003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98875135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05664985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05664985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.123004936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41102535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W142688777","doi":"10.21991/c9gw9p","title":"MEANING FROM CHAOS: REFLECTIONS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 — TWO YEARS AFTER","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Meaning (existential); Sociology; Law; Political science; Media studies; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10606902206255776,"score_gpt":0.3520335818041039,"score_spread":0.24596455974154613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W142688777","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03912917,0.004416082,0.00039525484,0.8922889,0.011242439,0.00003295988,0.00013744566,0.000014184417,0.052343577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60049057,0.007624273,0.00042763364,0.30932766,0.0109605575,0.00018401504,0.00021927732,0.00027534715,0.07049061],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869381,0.0068731597,0.00029179937,0.0008758662,0.0018277596,0.0031933167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849546,0.009145773,0.0009786038,0.00047786775,0.0012573099,0.0031857893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013937094,0.0006292076,0.00077723,0.00092188065,0.04178078,0.027539786,0.0031047433,0.020608712,0.006091629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033576194,0.0008334205,0.0008009692,0.0021074493,0.025438912,0.013773306,0.014221571,0.04921343,0.0013706936],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022909838,0.0000855059,0.0017438522,0.0001440809,0.000015370328,0.002810122,0.5583825,0.00014102044,0.00028810135,0.14879033,0.279504,0.007865996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023733233,0.000039674753,0.0025375793,0.00037550429,0.000006292232,0.00022704851,0.2826643,0.000055562152,0.00015756706,0.014720299,0.6991384,0.000054018823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056598436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11595662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056598436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021149896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013696111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15345395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W147926961","doi":"10.21991/c9607g","title":"THE NEW HUMAN RIGHTS AGENDA: THE FIRST SHELDON CHUMIR LECTURE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Law and economics; Public administration; Environmental ethics; Law; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03916774126094504,"score_gpt":0.2763629553880958,"score_spread":0.23719521412715075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W147926961","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008267953,0.03911944,0.00084120536,0.87452555,0.019315768,0.000009462454,0.000027784261,0.000019510731,0.06531445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1723424,0.06126304,0.0040831985,0.35894513,0.04958219,0.00018063968,0.00010763388,0.00029862052,0.3531972],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994962,0.0022168693,0.0000950064,0.00044473834,0.0013304522,0.00095098175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941737,0.0033295879,0.00019068853,0.00023749933,0.000640684,0.0014278799],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0097347805,0.00059861084,0.0010587702,0.00087644596,0.008618676,0.0111775985,0.0009396479,0.014546129,0.012297462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012353227,0.00052016164,0.00043057656,0.00078777404,0.011246358,0.013507798,0.0062904535,0.027988989,0.0024550543],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003205952,0.000029513298,0.000047268335,0.00005821123,0.0000029949074,0.000053393844,0.0007007089,0.000115319046,0.00009415423,0.43667257,0.54946095,0.012732734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001830269,0.000010142834,0.00014431177,0.000298608,0.000003580604,0.000030445557,0.0006271114,0.00015455102,0.00010146883,0.12178008,0.8768075,0.000023762499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017938334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032751616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017938334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014763308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013750473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.107115805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1480639299","doi":"10.21991/c9cd5d","title":"Public Interest Standing, Access to Justice, and Democracy under the Charter: Canada (AG) v Downtown Eastside Sex Workers United Against Violence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Downtown; Charter; Supreme court; Democracy; Political science; Public interest; Economic Justice; Intrusion; Public administration; Criminology; Law; Sociology; Geography; Archaeology; Politics","score_opus":0.04665941373494328,"score_gpt":0.29191571926207466,"score_spread":0.24525630552713137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1480639299","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11350148,0.0055701714,0.0016828572,0.2686173,0.0010493492,0.00008672116,0.00031482696,0.000038626746,0.6091387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94454604,0.0011957441,0.00041565724,0.017378483,0.00024084379,0.00003260965,0.000068312256,0.000018745799,0.036103513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99321544,0.001360049,0.000093404095,0.00042218392,0.0018625256,0.0030463424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971206,0.0009340924,0.00022182567,0.00018349297,0.00071773847,0.00082230946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042789867,0.00030650568,0.0003377982,0.00095027307,0.028287558,0.013807008,0.001664799,0.008400524,0.006693038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008028413,0.00024373313,0.00028824568,0.0015919768,0.03704318,0.0036171663,0.004917965,0.00980264,0.00022870633],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014456271,0.000019889036,0.0009448463,0.00001544231,0.0000036990955,0.00010906866,0.007249517,0.00011908865,0.000062559964,0.9659448,0.01926463,0.006251906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000102727434,0.000053559237,0.021176264,0.0006536679,0.000049160346,0.00017224901,0.04045282,0.0009945302,0.0008636228,0.4823149,0.45297465,0.00019187116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9467239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97495985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06549288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06549288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14542717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47518635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1480693685","doi":"10.21991/cf29363","title":"McIvor v. Canada and the 2010 Amendments to the Indian Act: A Half-Hearted Remedy to Historical Injustice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Injustice; Indigenous; Plaintiff; Political science; Law; Economic Justice; Inheritance (genetic algorithm)","score_opus":0.022561630482639816,"score_gpt":0.2761986025802654,"score_spread":0.2536369720976256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1480693685","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03924728,0.010244868,0.001606573,0.19027342,0.0019312883,0.00010021813,0.00060032075,0.00014570268,0.7558503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44952998,0.003776115,0.0018470905,0.12132248,0.00037182207,0.00008209866,0.00023155467,0.00012701727,0.42271176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939957,0.00062918384,0.0001234224,0.0004843105,0.0024818142,0.002285491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99709785,0.0007754319,0.00016537607,0.00017704976,0.0011163051,0.0006679931],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029315476,0.0004039447,0.00030995437,0.0011631653,0.025462609,0.007864431,0.0020359987,0.008927705,0.0061426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073906486,0.00045016644,0.00054364844,0.0015577007,0.012572712,0.0021039546,0.002739334,0.0095827505,0.0005216303],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003607612,0.000015439242,0.0010784704,0.000047591286,0.000008972711,0.00037055332,0.008917267,0.0001759143,0.00035140055,0.8004785,0.17757376,0.01094608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026646863,0.000014904632,0.004890589,0.00019920472,0.000029136416,0.000120205885,0.0048593213,0.00020248439,0.00069091696,0.019840099,0.96904635,0.000080118385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98862785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99549437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06677981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06677981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15553133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48452365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W14808197","doi":"10.21991/c9z961","title":"THE EUROPEAN SOCIAL CHARTER: AN END TO THATCHERISM?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Thatcherism; Charter; Political science; Telecommunications; Computer science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.06796903635034832,"score_gpt":0.3150861933854609,"score_spread":0.24711715703511258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W14808197","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017944887,0.010794414,0.006474437,0.69070125,0.0058041518,0.000039946055,0.00009989757,0.0000939892,0.26804698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63724303,0.003923166,0.005790537,0.25194353,0.006886025,0.00027124968,0.000120322475,0.00030821888,0.09351393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9792404,0.010419838,0.0006715957,0.0024279333,0.0031041596,0.0041360776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920493,0.0040193526,0.0006531396,0.0012571408,0.00089740264,0.0011236967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026825504,0.0012897624,0.0018867762,0.0016428353,0.012499919,0.023908429,0.0031652628,0.053154256,0.008517308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031901166,0.00070479076,0.001262045,0.0019766798,0.053658452,0.027363366,0.011927654,0.027942998,0.0009824109],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009488794,0.000008655289,0.000028226206,0.0000067045994,0.000002620411,0.000018679955,0.00066813914,0.000041330957,0.000021047896,0.9909046,0.0067965277,0.0014939483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004929519,0.000022841923,0.00041677436,0.00018131411,0.000008426796,0.000046152913,0.002062085,0.0002219347,0.00016509295,0.7802383,0.21653542,0.000052364725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016919797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014657379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053154256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010283282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017490659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14186853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1481241279","doi":"10.21991/c92d5m","title":"Key Theoretical Issues in the Interaction of Law and Religion: A Guide for the Perplexed","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Hegelianism; Politics; State (computer science); Variety (cybernetics); Law; Epistemology; Key (lock); Philosophy of law; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Public law","score_opus":0.024692215112159046,"score_gpt":0.3378829214568421,"score_spread":0.3131907063446831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1481241279","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030756225,0.32182714,0.09125898,0.34242114,0.011711844,0.0010765241,0.0011127233,0.00047954606,0.22703642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07269642,0.2781069,0.27786773,0.10975579,0.023217957,0.006317912,0.0015851221,0.0010270949,0.22942515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973641,0.00171372,0.00017405569,0.00018246222,0.00044636044,0.00011933127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958872,0.00314322,0.00017802078,0.00019861679,0.00034834555,0.00024448696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004500065,0.0021003615,0.0014400876,0.005440343,0.004384201,0.00824423,0.003877328,0.0064990767,0.011807416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062026,0.0010298,0.0009630756,0.0044567585,0.023106296,0.012423265,0.004535423,0.0142225325,0.0068370104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010330049,0.00007427358,0.0001322767,0.0002960872,0.0000055341934,0.0002332467,0.0063637705,0.0002862954,0.00032075858,0.8437018,0.124244675,0.024331013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007682896,0.000014795164,0.00014453726,0.0006168963,0.0000021911583,0.00022939843,0.00227457,0.00031130319,0.00007027911,0.41826555,0.57804847,0.0000143968045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047855624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007768291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011807416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048546614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042625153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0394997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1482326114","doi":"10.21991/c9k088","title":"THE INDEPENDENCE AND IMPARTIALITY OF PROVINCIAL COURT JUDGES: RAPPORTEUR’S COMMENTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Independence (probability theory); Law; Political science; Judicial independence; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.047623515810483394,"score_gpt":0.28810369190912355,"score_spread":0.24048017609864014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1482326114","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027344848,0.0013050152,0.0002732431,0.9768415,0.0045390227,0.000027363043,0.00009998443,0.000019184929,0.014160166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.072717145,0.0017258773,0.0008187486,0.89389753,0.00697119,0.0001633255,0.000057317884,0.000086976936,0.023561876],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9652411,0.0071659437,0.002620096,0.005412074,0.010107504,0.009453379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9004272,0.06219241,0.0031474228,0.003603993,0.024493484,0.0061354097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028053425,0.00081841816,0.002061884,0.0019110461,0.039064918,0.014774964,0.009003825,0.0795365,0.006098516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11539751,0.0022629427,0.0027268364,0.0032343315,0.015747786,0.009395531,0.008312779,0.08741774,0.0016881613],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097164724,0.000024707053,0.0007256978,0.0001252879,0.00007564996,0.001087153,0.015132286,0.00030574907,0.00030591898,0.11568794,0.8635478,0.0028845887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000109906956,0.000031730426,0.0046695583,0.0007265578,0.00023586921,0.00086407724,0.020757716,0.0010508215,0.0012905698,0.037482493,0.9323238,0.0004568835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5711421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6266753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9565723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0434277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.060798943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8627671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1483212777","doi":"10.21991/c96m2s","title":"LAW V. CANADA: FORMATTING EQUALITY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disk formatting; Law; Political science; Computer science; Operating system","score_opus":0.05300220965465181,"score_gpt":0.21397958625565,"score_spread":0.1609773766009982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1483212777","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013285208,0.0057289614,0.0042054174,0.22851245,0.0036290342,0.0007239642,0.0075169886,0.0005966408,0.7358014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18271808,0.0043847593,0.00796665,0.32451907,0.0009918618,0.00075200765,0.0020027868,0.00037386685,0.47629085],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9795725,0.0019339428,0.0007189846,0.0013999458,0.009656343,0.0067183687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97683823,0.005849489,0.0006545234,0.0012173154,0.012434646,0.0030056997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00961253,0.00090589526,0.00089026283,0.002088036,0.018271213,0.010737933,0.0047919117,0.024394203,0.02513642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02854921,0.0012479067,0.0012526726,0.0033031804,0.0051916456,0.004269497,0.0028205037,0.010922105,0.003166125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006346863,0.000051327046,0.0017164131,0.00014875291,0.000022413098,0.00022172068,0.0013472699,0.00040483157,0.00064190204,0.33719885,0.6453924,0.0127906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021638429,0.000042433654,0.011776846,0.0005244371,0.00010251836,0.00015390223,0.0013504376,0.0005651139,0.0014492704,0.025240865,0.9583261,0.00025168565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9862686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9910459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9253373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0746627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30682927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54171836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1483392136","doi":"10.21991/c9tq11","title":"ABORIGINAL AND TREATY RIGHTS - RECONCILING POWERS AND DUTIES: A COMMENT ON HORSEMAN, SIOUI AND SPARROW","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Sparrow; Treaty; Political science; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.02812045969686056,"score_gpt":0.28528189733142384,"score_spread":0.2571614376345633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1483392136","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004864472,0.004807806,0.00044902018,0.95509803,0.009931958,0.00010590032,0.00016350063,0.00004190123,0.024537342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017967617,0.0014180451,0.00058580673,0.94305974,0.00372087,0.00020174553,0.000035677676,0.00007919636,0.032931324],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9808672,0.0049179555,0.0016771234,0.003055552,0.004097577,0.0053846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9675364,0.02321256,0.0015170447,0.0010167293,0.004153026,0.0025642535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023022829,0.0014092999,0.0034201173,0.0014192692,0.04886727,0.015566687,0.010605105,0.12937737,0.008610894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04583758,0.0035577186,0.003399852,0.0028922516,0.01712464,0.009721642,0.008561042,0.12737456,0.0023594531],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009358139,0.00007927597,0.0006916611,0.00028629965,0.00007320433,0.0008102931,0.03645017,0.0001704446,0.00048023454,0.14602524,0.8104142,0.004425451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016338755,0.00006921993,0.003512371,0.001351716,0.00025336677,0.00021307945,0.026086794,0.00028859742,0.00082514994,0.021554349,0.9453912,0.0002907414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5061175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67914253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49388248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021478942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.061714992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9935821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W148393335","doi":"10.21991/c99s93","title":"THE MORE THINGS CHANGE: SOVEREIGNTY, QUÉBEC AND THE NEW WORLD","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Interdisciplinary Cultural and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.04877582247027498,"score_gpt":0.2893308788411852,"score_spread":0.2405550563709102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W148393335","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34249005,0.04134659,0.0006509469,0.3213383,0.00096934487,0.00007592721,0.0013527764,0.000033785418,0.2917423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91704667,0.006874852,0.00033890072,0.01647822,0.00014448426,0.000052545063,0.00025272506,0.000018211498,0.0587933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99766326,0.0005588284,0.000045071498,0.00012859894,0.00046043302,0.0011438357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99550277,0.0014234692,0.00036484815,0.00012490092,0.0011179508,0.0014662058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002192877,0.00019500995,0.00041324916,0.0014418914,0.015839152,0.010196447,0.0014485568,0.00339395,0.013680088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043170913,0.0002133769,0.0004493381,0.0039879708,0.007730635,0.004474903,0.0024461776,0.0054591945,0.0002569736],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021259565,0.00023363432,0.05986377,0.00041786485,0.00012093506,0.001486426,0.07571093,0.0014304658,0.000524002,0.64218396,0.15540668,0.062408727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012399383,0.000059131387,0.22855209,0.001405941,0.0001207984,0.00024001303,0.11655002,0.0016097731,0.00030382938,0.0315613,0.6192227,0.00025046346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99634016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99861073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.114644356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.114644356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12637337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8318069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1484340775","doi":"10.21991/c91958","title":"ITS ALL IN THE FAMILY: CHILD SUPPORT, TAX AND THIBAUDEAU","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.051600167727814034,"score_gpt":0.2809020562185577,"score_spread":0.22930188849074365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1484340775","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5337789,0.03921802,0.00022044955,0.25723645,0.00068626687,0.000040066585,0.00015260333,0.0000063579564,0.1686608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9819666,0.006735547,0.00004818668,0.0039933254,0.000094874944,0.00002502559,0.000013381215,0.0000034009638,0.0071196733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988066,0.00047873944,0.000020726966,0.000056361834,0.00011647833,0.0005211631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838626,0.0008078795,0.0001519543,0.000049756538,0.0001250729,0.00047904113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018335956,0.00015743432,0.00034304336,0.00096973253,0.010037466,0.00567674,0.0008386352,0.0022708424,0.0061994884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036753856,0.00017716055,0.00018378528,0.0023514973,0.0073446794,0.003001732,0.0040583257,0.0042214612,0.00011260747],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001040683,0.0002143089,0.031678863,0.00014414595,0.000032835167,0.0008581157,0.1539072,0.00017651297,0.00023860393,0.75305676,0.025772847,0.033815816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006554484,0.00008904962,0.11491496,0.0013689154,0.000074800104,0.000581533,0.5000733,0.00037397325,0.00032556572,0.10094599,0.28111532,0.00007092468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2151344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40783507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2151344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00947716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011665704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4277643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1485315654","doi":"10.21991/c9908s","title":"CONSTITUTIONALIZING THE PATRIARCHY: ABORIGINAL WOMEN AND ABORIGINAL GOVERNMENT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Patriarchy; Government (linguistics); Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028147571320146187,"score_gpt":0.3002645235946371,"score_spread":0.27211695227449095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1485315654","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21485534,0.018914446,0.0031278648,0.2945902,0.0012923896,0.000110624984,0.000054053722,0.000030639367,0.4670245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9771962,0.0018953839,0.00041983748,0.0054361853,0.00029538103,0.000058086756,0.000009006238,0.000015474201,0.014674431],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98782456,0.007999218,0.00021508559,0.00051965774,0.0007625268,0.0026789554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99140304,0.006346179,0.0006171428,0.00041113654,0.00047044366,0.00075204356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01719998,0.00045457497,0.00074754265,0.001300112,0.026897876,0.019215945,0.0022778562,0.011328303,0.0056492914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018726919,0.00054418034,0.00058877823,0.002378272,0.10362873,0.0099020265,0.00998315,0.014958604,0.00024094155],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000098466035,0.000014077571,0.00020662881,0.000023541032,0.0000027087485,0.00010790792,0.10001189,0.000043465476,0.000057840036,0.8970025,0.0011594507,0.0013600993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006196291,0.00006034265,0.002764657,0.0004624479,0.00003384425,0.00020321198,0.29636407,0.0002219771,0.00030030403,0.5868457,0.112620935,0.000060472503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18856524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1919559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9832303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016769735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04107713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3749354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1485831801","doi":"10.21991/c9kh3j","title":"A Democratic Defence of the Court Challenges Program","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Disadvantaged; Parliament; Political science; Public administration; Law; Democracy; Government (linguistics); Politics","score_opus":0.06703664203223589,"score_gpt":0.2888507386046461,"score_spread":0.22181409657241022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1485831801","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014625492,0.0016300785,0.010755261,0.4729355,0.0038984788,0.00034544207,0.00023970372,0.00018443214,0.4953856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50111467,0.0009045401,0.005647163,0.20120609,0.002840814,0.0006403381,0.00013288115,0.00018757606,0.28732598],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96513444,0.010232966,0.0007760528,0.004996161,0.011927493,0.0069328686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96565664,0.017621359,0.0012800222,0.0038414532,0.005893355,0.0057072793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034328714,0.0006502368,0.0006553324,0.0011888015,0.025597211,0.018940452,0.0030170255,0.022506053,0.010728293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050018977,0.00082226563,0.00077328656,0.0011205,0.024219675,0.0069402717,0.01206463,0.030350832,0.0013663782],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012057063,0.000023136727,0.00021580131,0.000018252771,0.0000052401992,0.000072053954,0.001798002,0.00015983717,0.0001546721,0.9531191,0.03882665,0.005595205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008323667,0.000046909972,0.0011248178,0.00013410927,0.000012745635,0.0000724879,0.0012972477,0.00081638177,0.00069036137,0.14791998,0.84773546,0.000066288565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26486003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36440033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26486003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03345786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13145381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5266367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1486238463","doi":"10.21991/c9tw8d","title":"THE CHANGING FACE OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN CANADA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Human rights; Political science; Business; Sociology; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.031959000612028346,"score_gpt":0.2605751560421894,"score_spread":0.22861615543016106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1486238463","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24904056,0.017914219,0.0012232334,0.48978084,0.0017883915,0.00011036264,0.0012526083,0.00010269736,0.23878695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91772115,0.0058658626,0.0011571671,0.027416548,0.00020931131,0.000034781704,0.0002178977,0.00006708123,0.047310255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9841137,0.0012288011,0.00027523603,0.00092538446,0.0048931455,0.008563779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98494774,0.0020884096,0.00061382004,0.00024302684,0.0052802064,0.006826864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048220386,0.00034654405,0.0009611575,0.0036666791,0.039379437,0.020743864,0.0036642586,0.007782885,0.014407414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012070337,0.0007207848,0.00090794236,0.0070336554,0.012079205,0.003949411,0.0052483156,0.011125595,0.00038215745],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017232701,0.000120482066,0.020269519,0.00034072346,0.00011930859,0.0021011033,0.026488012,0.003212109,0.000978635,0.7428493,0.14500032,0.058348134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011984506,0.000056662862,0.08078069,0.0008249023,0.00012154766,0.0003293017,0.0622715,0.0036670156,0.0007326244,0.058472443,0.79207855,0.0005449732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99909246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4047478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.4047478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.49716717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6904082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W148650106","doi":"10.21991/c98d5g","title":"THE HARD CASE OF DEFINING “THE MÉTIS PEOPLE” AND THEIR RIGHTS: A COMMENT ON R. V. POWLEY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Treaty; Section (typography); Law; Political science; Task (project management); Constitutional law; Business; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.036990190960873595,"score_gpt":0.2787448181654569,"score_spread":0.2417546272045833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W148650106","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029417824,0.004778913,0.00043095538,0.9618957,0.0042237476,0.000042461645,0.00015603413,0.00003799387,0.025492411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027506005,0.0015860369,0.0006685987,0.94055164,0.0019250015,0.00006863971,0.000054166383,0.0000621145,0.027577726],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98751396,0.0026182262,0.00050801685,0.0018919533,0.0049993796,0.0024685466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.983714,0.011231076,0.0005655392,0.00039418184,0.0027537246,0.001341522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014333359,0.0011792667,0.0014057504,0.0012815808,0.032183293,0.010453892,0.008955526,0.045493785,0.0063344063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023285905,0.0013644808,0.0012340359,0.0022710639,0.02988563,0.007902419,0.0051647434,0.06319771,0.0017796457],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042831314,0.000023492328,0.0003629049,0.000114108174,0.000012952753,0.000380752,0.01744988,0.000105782914,0.00040856635,0.21946391,0.7561638,0.0054710037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009209634,0.00003947179,0.0024160605,0.0006387522,0.000054277236,0.0002306887,0.015916724,0.00028280047,0.0009352815,0.040518507,0.9386768,0.00019862727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8464224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91255826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15357763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03468467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.083997525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30896413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1488097330","doi":"10.21991/c9s67t","title":"Re-Framing the Sharia Arbitration Debate","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Sharia; Religious freedom; Nothing; Arbitration; Law; Political science; Human rights; Hatred; Freedom of religion; Islam; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.04711717255424792,"score_gpt":0.2850996094726049,"score_spread":0.23798243691835697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1488097330","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045797545,0.006416454,0.0054674265,0.41566026,0.0042171287,0.00007475082,0.00013328952,0.000058224097,0.52217495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.835729,0.0018538662,0.0019839986,0.046905253,0.0014780429,0.00006318702,0.000057582,0.00008813244,0.111840986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98673743,0.0039359434,0.00034540953,0.0009936303,0.0046336357,0.0033540283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922712,0.0033848786,0.00036677264,0.0005826825,0.0022835436,0.0011108718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01487959,0.00039833836,0.0005704943,0.0013438046,0.020903833,0.010402609,0.0028334053,0.008687673,0.0059046783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01523893,0.00043569805,0.000508296,0.001283344,0.03789145,0.0040994952,0.0059670988,0.008739277,0.00047972504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027146923,0.000008792177,0.0005692965,0.00004831498,0.00000661144,0.00011955872,0.026476687,0.00013067496,0.00016639373,0.9235947,0.04123083,0.0076210145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039136925,0.000009851364,0.002234531,0.0002106891,0.00001876056,0.000055414537,0.012360976,0.0003783362,0.0002979916,0.08894254,0.89541435,0.000037398106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7884713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8936877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7884713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08983638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06671356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6518116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1489398868","doi":"10.21991/c94t1v","title":"“Irreconcilable? The Duty to Consult and Administrative Decision Makers”","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Duty; Sovereignty; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Formative assessment; Relation (database); Sociology; History","score_opus":0.03535903856437894,"score_gpt":0.32172282689042964,"score_spread":0.2863637883260507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1489398868","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020589026,0.00558515,0.009902445,0.5794015,0.0011483427,0.000096370975,0.000061868,0.00012895322,0.38308644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8521973,0.0013091906,0.005784049,0.07428489,0.0007159765,0.00015407268,0.000039764487,0.00007136417,0.06544336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9655604,0.017681701,0.0011050461,0.0033231026,0.007025176,0.005304738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9831165,0.009984239,0.00087240816,0.0016693289,0.0027646653,0.0015928535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03099331,0.0003960159,0.00054030016,0.0011331885,0.02517313,0.024750367,0.0033060517,0.018231547,0.004910865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033921346,0.0006585076,0.0005206954,0.0010799848,0.084781334,0.010513881,0.006296692,0.018115232,0.0008784767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039790857,0.000009173957,0.00014455452,0.000015501508,0.0000021969001,0.00009141508,0.008480895,0.000056120607,0.00006880468,0.9716935,0.016102739,0.003331144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002791231,0.000013344931,0.0006388646,0.00031567903,0.0000124507815,0.00015871174,0.013106839,0.0004321876,0.00040259692,0.6786779,0.3061574,0.000056021603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24166615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25180575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24166615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027130932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.069009095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.480519},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1489450614","doi":"10.21991/c9nd5w","title":"The Truth About Canadian Judicial Activism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial activism; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Scrutiny; Legislature; Judicial review; Deference; Parliament; Economic Justice; Judicial deference; Judicial independence; Judicial restraint; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.038149313754194385,"score_gpt":0.2667368051314889,"score_spread":0.2285874913772945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1489450614","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009173083,0.034980297,0.00040618272,0.7102221,0.0033435125,0.000017063152,0.000835855,0.00005268779,0.24096927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61166555,0.056614805,0.0013425273,0.26659676,0.004672507,0.00006935818,0.00096039113,0.00021119963,0.057866868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98811823,0.0011988044,0.00027153702,0.0016767444,0.0056770127,0.003057648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98258305,0.005728071,0.0007220655,0.0007197665,0.008015723,0.0022313823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068669966,0.00054622884,0.0008633109,0.0048736413,0.02485512,0.018557576,0.003120446,0.008183648,0.018850854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02498053,0.0004355963,0.00054036477,0.0075748935,0.01844399,0.0052274973,0.0032164443,0.012001593,0.0011279242],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054018812,0.00001650456,0.0020016988,0.00026118642,0.000026219777,0.00013658962,0.0069619594,0.00012522518,0.00012992878,0.5783382,0.37140137,0.040547244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027456004,0.0000087852295,0.007319294,0.0008931372,0.00003774909,0.00006817431,0.0076464307,0.0001610793,0.00018423695,0.036467154,0.94711715,0.00006942087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9836558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.987135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8554647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14453532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13562205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9922178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1490264631","doi":"10.21991/c9ww9d","title":"Arbitration Using Sharia Law in Canada: A Constitutional and Human Rights Perspective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Studies and Policies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Sharia; Law; Statute; Political science; Adjudication; Religious law; Government (linguistics); Islam; Public law; Common law; Family law; Geography","score_opus":0.04494612092775147,"score_gpt":0.2895543192311775,"score_spread":0.24460819830342606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1490264631","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04175795,0.017518464,0.0032628486,0.14781652,0.0005615195,0.00021971394,0.00054918404,0.00007550946,0.78823835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85074484,0.017747998,0.004842684,0.03483547,0.0004706431,0.00015006565,0.00025542855,0.00007882402,0.09087402],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9852688,0.0016596641,0.00040545568,0.0011961804,0.00571749,0.0057524336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870165,0.0045859395,0.0006128486,0.00043327696,0.0053274543,0.0020238424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008151309,0.00057087396,0.00079243036,0.003871586,0.038535632,0.02039912,0.005195541,0.008242538,0.014733002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014956067,0.0008901088,0.0006656036,0.0057856943,0.028430674,0.00461788,0.004321086,0.007883439,0.0004992011],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013367603,0.000024836947,0.0016339133,0.0000845505,0.00001130586,0.00033368004,0.0037353614,0.0004975715,0.00012591093,0.96889395,0.015689217,0.008956261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008805322,0.000050875242,0.018234136,0.0011664516,0.00008867564,0.00035376239,0.016658895,0.0040051225,0.00060008233,0.2219062,0.7365646,0.00028326293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9968707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28172684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.28172684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.36300647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8330951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1490470204","doi":"10.21991/c9z393","title":"Alberta's Métis Settlements and the Co-Management Agreement","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metis; Human settlement; Destiny (ISS module); Set-aside; Geography; Archaeology; Engineering; Computer science; Ecology; Database","score_opus":0.017801257884777773,"score_gpt":0.31959245856719093,"score_spread":0.30179120068241316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1490470204","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029148676,0.0016265893,0.0010397076,0.0738418,0.0013170708,0.00009956687,0.00022340844,0.00010790311,0.89259523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2659738,0.0004989607,0.0011495643,0.0134512605,0.00022070708,0.00008539688,0.00015079477,0.000044507648,0.7184251],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99518543,0.00047902693,0.000072541014,0.00027486752,0.0018021817,0.0021860453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99732673,0.00059099926,0.00008721863,0.0001729655,0.0007370089,0.0010850047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039482205,0.00030631956,0.00031092486,0.000676174,0.022136634,0.009718902,0.001896584,0.00758448,0.015655447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055371625,0.0004441788,0.0003035398,0.0011199394,0.0078088036,0.0014679199,0.0052060056,0.0059407935,0.00095379294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051939984,0.000052099575,0.0019445794,0.00003102043,0.000008912013,0.0004544678,0.004771361,0.00030899802,0.00045369944,0.77579314,0.19987246,0.016257325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041904088,0.000020101661,0.008613751,0.000061452614,0.000010772272,0.00006846213,0.004531245,0.0002872632,0.00029144235,0.015084985,0.9709491,0.000039599374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90635645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9690945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.093643546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03296133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09338038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23915231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1491314947","doi":"10.21991/c9sm22","title":"The Perfect Storm: Section 12, Mandatory Minimum Sentences and the Problem of the Unusual Case","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Charter; Political science; Legislation; Mandate; Sentence; Punishment (psychology); Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.012680692947726304,"score_gpt":0.2534257121302005,"score_spread":0.24074501918247418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491314947","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03111631,0.0040267957,0.011483078,0.6892257,0.0052573667,0.00011663065,0.0002576928,0.00013198477,0.25838444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6054816,0.002480096,0.01049012,0.3128412,0.0072473357,0.0008515502,0.00026378589,0.0003040451,0.060040083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9832524,0.0080696605,0.001214265,0.0018215262,0.0031366595,0.0025055888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9521392,0.039699152,0.0020728423,0.0015951846,0.0029448615,0.0015488804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027044399,0.00034509474,0.000629836,0.0011446663,0.013488984,0.008905418,0.0039862324,0.020974666,0.0076478496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.077604175,0.0010146933,0.00046290134,0.00096735224,0.016605671,0.010162254,0.0049558356,0.020532362,0.00085321354],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023700784,0.000030164843,0.0011315846,0.00006553051,0.0000052297446,0.00084763614,0.0066728424,0.00010313449,0.00011845003,0.78656137,0.19251649,0.011923796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007328148,0.000053097054,0.0053960923,0.0013674356,0.000034620112,0.0023183099,0.016560618,0.0011723181,0.0006403863,0.5476364,0.4246318,0.00011569382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021812197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04738749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027044399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004615067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012333882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14302617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1491735705","doi":"10.21991/c9707s","title":"THE NAFTA DURUM DISPUTE AND THE CANADA GRAIN ACT: A CASE STUDY IN INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business; International trade","score_opus":0.025071011320314685,"score_gpt":0.25410505622461244,"score_spread":0.22903404490429774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491735705","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6956243,0.0038671836,0.0014854246,0.024952756,0.00009522447,0.00027375115,0.0003391574,0.000021884942,0.27334028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97831136,0.0015795829,0.0010531794,0.0011958437,0.000014889741,0.00009108303,0.00010622263,0.0000117081645,0.017636046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99174327,0.0024338039,0.0001820506,0.00034517545,0.0023471054,0.0029486038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885932,0.0076447832,0.0007799616,0.0003086819,0.0017914147,0.0008819262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066410466,0.00037429377,0.00066650857,0.003129235,0.03742872,0.011838916,0.0028174475,0.008624052,0.0026999076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0140760895,0.00049632945,0.0004827892,0.008499131,0.02128433,0.0039938483,0.004373335,0.005836565,0.00013534696],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012583246,0.00029383664,0.025888296,0.00018532212,0.00003999201,0.0057144836,0.14615503,0.0033182316,0.00049409096,0.77592087,0.019689986,0.022174021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014270325,0.00009668648,0.05992384,0.0007553769,0.00012879285,0.0011645327,0.5905127,0.0043625585,0.0016458919,0.03377264,0.30729818,0.00019604564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9786759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98888355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8570554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1429446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15559018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9940628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1491919779","doi":"10.21991/c96m35","title":"Administrative Law, Judicial Deference, and the Charter","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Doctrine; Administrative law; Law; Judicial deference; Charter; Political science; Judicial review; Standard of review; Judicial opinion","score_opus":0.03788362426289593,"score_gpt":0.31262739621202357,"score_spread":0.27474377194912764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491919779","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025137817,0.020924866,0.023359137,0.18949942,0.0024391098,0.00007864844,0.00016718771,0.00017056636,0.73822325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88904166,0.0062309084,0.0073639033,0.018908277,0.00244855,0.00010042333,0.00008565801,0.00008522768,0.07573544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9838906,0.0042958725,0.00044245098,0.0014742314,0.007019016,0.0028778717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98431015,0.0072724037,0.0013380738,0.0013932062,0.0044275476,0.0012586701],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014442564,0.0003546745,0.00049822446,0.0028559067,0.012905102,0.018852644,0.0025949713,0.005752095,0.004607184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026746612,0.00039284254,0.00049793726,0.0024655848,0.05580254,0.006198457,0.0033284917,0.009852921,0.0005948322],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024627539,0.000002734949,0.00006211676,0.0000052189084,5.2588246e-7,0.00001835203,0.00042174943,0.00005424242,0.000015050114,0.9940128,0.0031499767,0.0022548102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001948598,0.000016630405,0.0009796438,0.0001573389,0.0000062224112,0.0000511273,0.0009806571,0.0004849686,0.00014907733,0.8068224,0.19029453,0.00003779531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31006223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2817479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9720875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027912486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043234717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6165149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493223159","doi":"10.21991/c9r37g","title":"Rebuttal to Edmund A. Aunger, “The Constitution of Canada and the Official Status of French in Alberta”","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Rebuttal; Constitution; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.01705604078274909,"score_gpt":0.24308310604360334,"score_spread":0.22602706526085425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1493223159","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009854904,0.005700851,0.00018921451,0.91745365,0.053472273,0.00005873886,0.001174402,0.0001803312,0.02078504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012430084,0.002062984,0.0004539195,0.85511833,0.011437345,0.00011552901,0.00039065708,0.00008512338,0.117906086],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98752034,0.00089170784,0.00057373417,0.0021115954,0.006139569,0.0027630762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97172475,0.005510689,0.0007048736,0.00087672664,0.018655213,0.00252774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057961703,0.0020242715,0.002574758,0.002970568,0.01706823,0.009357079,0.008314336,0.049262743,0.015533881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03275744,0.0014925238,0.0021830779,0.003181818,0.0067466986,0.0035881703,0.003548138,0.041664716,0.010321111],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027784543,0.0000080601485,0.00015885958,0.000024239427,0.000014051989,0.0000931078,0.00026217705,0.000047428995,0.00007429277,0.005433339,0.9925228,0.0013338126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041705873,0.00001754824,0.0031390514,0.00023208887,0.00005191796,0.00006775448,0.0009939154,0.00022977775,0.000293842,0.00436047,0.9904226,0.00014926535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81738055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.891515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18261945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056364603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36738986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493551315","doi":"10.21991/c9pt0f","title":"Case Comment: Canada (Attorney General) v PHS Community Services Society","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Discretion; Jurisprudence; Political science; Legal guardian; Constitutional court; Public administration; Constitution","score_opus":0.04371893510183338,"score_gpt":0.26364144151413,"score_spread":0.2199225064122966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1493551315","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020414174,0.003788878,0.0009766703,0.6999283,0.0036780601,0.00027540184,0.0011229196,0.000119076205,0.26969662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13331923,0.001886728,0.0006595887,0.7342112,0.0014507126,0.00014876958,0.0003164056,0.0000711672,0.12793626],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99299145,0.00056961353,0.00016243524,0.0008288761,0.0026936592,0.0027539656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969037,0.0015051997,0.000119510965,0.000077590965,0.0010311824,0.00036276283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028380125,0.0006901576,0.00068925676,0.001519616,0.025717655,0.0070855413,0.0041459915,0.03474118,0.013218716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009727874,0.00083591265,0.001225603,0.002954354,0.006681468,0.0024368938,0.0020097224,0.022660878,0.001829166],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072727504,0.000056165172,0.0022143493,0.00007721025,0.000025584302,0.0033343874,0.004572781,0.00034640013,0.0004705108,0.21934137,0.764557,0.004931426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013195808,0.00004780499,0.005924284,0.00037142067,0.00011395345,0.0013069845,0.010915776,0.0010263902,0.0012111781,0.026327074,0.9524039,0.00021931216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9149827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9472689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08501732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047256913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06291811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34287453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W149426997","doi":"10.21991/c93x06","title":"JUDICIAL REVIEW IN THE NEW HONG KONG: PROPHECIES AND PORTENTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.061022954876434284,"score_gpt":0.2913992043137709,"score_spread":0.23037624943733664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W149426997","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80113,0.03666767,0.00061379693,0.09296042,0.00062660803,0.00009112521,0.00015412726,0.000017136115,0.06773917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9783804,0.0066520586,0.00017784651,0.0051645245,0.00031276888,0.000029355995,0.00001905048,0.0000071468808,0.0092568],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900928,0.004273806,0.0007714089,0.00089431676,0.0014124281,0.0025552218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95441324,0.027069453,0.005254478,0.0013156771,0.0066397814,0.005307369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01454289,0.00019269084,0.00065683713,0.0024273552,0.008862798,0.01334503,0.0013869889,0.0030069079,0.0022433226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02448144,0.00078901596,0.00039350637,0.0030334394,0.01909497,0.0032245098,0.0029601047,0.0046850233,0.00014769306],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006677101,0.00029189978,0.15642446,0.000746002,0.0002674633,0.0055850944,0.09392795,0.0033501058,0.0011027677,0.6207949,0.04238978,0.07445182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031265538,0.00039310992,0.6142511,0.0015699373,0.00032407374,0.0009812525,0.080146946,0.004020676,0.0014720205,0.044702247,0.2513226,0.00050351693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6332487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7638305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6332487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04263846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.054323524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73782235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1497789910","doi":"10.21991/c93m37","title":"THE AFFAIR OF THE CHAIRS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Caucus; House of Commons; Opposition (politics); Prime minister; Ballot; Parliament; Political science; Alliance; Law; Politics; Humiliation; Voting","score_opus":0.02047646147862565,"score_gpt":0.21909218954659512,"score_spread":0.19861572806796948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1497789910","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012824739,0.0024411927,0.002028555,0.11101426,0.018281998,0.00016111902,0.00044520892,0.00037143193,0.85243154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.114627846,0.00053093967,0.0005130104,0.015393698,0.00075642526,0.0000420828,0.00013904294,0.00020702761,0.86779],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893646,0.0010256262,0.0001921732,0.0014379567,0.003497619,0.004481946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99424005,0.00031979757,0.00012643337,0.00037599952,0.0023720064,0.002565767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00435375,0.00066643965,0.00057038554,0.0014810947,0.031698156,0.009398551,0.0013351542,0.00464215,0.045165423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013279047,0.0007780107,0.0004916593,0.0013554598,0.007172942,0.002607904,0.0041034664,0.013018039,0.012523284],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044757086,0.000019446717,0.0007876733,0.000028268212,0.00000745733,0.00016099517,0.004905241,0.00004694306,0.0006390941,0.44058427,0.5361665,0.016609328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051898405,0.0000069431712,0.0006282631,0.000021653268,0.0000036630224,0.000030058085,0.0013080317,0.00002489943,0.00023290071,0.0038146805,0.99391174,0.000012015663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5636511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71870756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9661995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03380046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04702329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8778373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1498544013","doi":"10.21991/c99w94","title":"The Fixed-Date Election Law: Constitutional Convention or Conventional Politics?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Law; Political science; General election; Convention; Prime minister; Politics; Democracy; Constitutional court; Constitution","score_opus":0.026385093745672047,"score_gpt":0.3035225852739148,"score_spread":0.27713749152824274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1498544013","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038361993,0.018008187,0.023539502,0.24436985,0.0036588958,0.00008417832,0.00040014225,0.00011612775,0.6714611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9186278,0.0041591227,0.0039273053,0.027654769,0.0026357982,0.00011640528,0.00019114811,0.00008205825,0.042605642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920758,0.0026245555,0.00028235794,0.0016969354,0.0019034405,0.0014168599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955122,0.0025708822,0.0004781074,0.0006447157,0.000490406,0.00030372423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009590914,0.00027709443,0.00053534715,0.0010454396,0.005935876,0.013364992,0.0019075886,0.005032989,0.008428904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015607697,0.00034420335,0.00027644137,0.0023162356,0.04016262,0.00923989,0.0022818693,0.00946675,0.0009245067],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021050475,0.0000024819142,0.000047777616,0.000005277962,6.460496e-7,0.000004170778,0.0002691486,0.000014019947,0.000013649683,0.99555665,0.00260595,0.0014782111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035442532,0.00002057771,0.0011622711,0.00017819203,0.00000728334,0.00003837917,0.0011269755,0.0003085115,0.00017583912,0.786916,0.21000162,0.00002893345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053539023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.064178444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053539023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013023873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008306402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10645479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1498821330","doi":"10.21991/c9zq18","title":"Sometimes Constitutions are Made in the Streets: the Future of the Charter’s Notwithstanding Clause","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Legislature; Charter; Political science; Parliament; Law; Constitution; Law and economics; Politics; Order (exchange); Constitutional law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.04098074569533218,"score_gpt":0.2691496057889388,"score_spread":0.22816886009360665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1498821330","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14540522,0.009702474,0.006690204,0.11002007,0.0007156875,0.000026522326,0.00014660263,0.00004301088,0.72725034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97751856,0.0019235129,0.00068775396,0.0030854363,0.00017962365,0.000014777672,0.000039915165,0.000024936477,0.016525455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947226,0.0022770423,0.000076547534,0.00044506302,0.0013014774,0.0011772219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99580437,0.0024272988,0.00046389445,0.00035646735,0.0007332149,0.00021466294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050293016,0.00014072063,0.00022071178,0.0008381467,0.011549709,0.008561038,0.00052042276,0.0021493654,0.0025392976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008811159,0.00021374994,0.00017048171,0.001405403,0.019914126,0.00847397,0.0019084321,0.004549013,0.0002592116],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053478284,0.0000017418279,0.00029855728,0.000008115148,0.000001068694,0.000034669916,0.0077613285,0.000050677176,0.000050435672,0.9857167,0.0034418819,0.0026294324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016043636,0.000022096216,0.0043965187,0.00026418283,0.000013434384,0.00013787686,0.0296111,0.00040186627,0.00061773974,0.34770674,0.6167718,0.000040550727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.106004015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19143583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.893996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0098105585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010373369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.210774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1499115456","doi":"10.21991/c9t66r","title":"SUPREME COURT OF CANADA IN BRYDGES EXANDS RIGHT TO COUNSEL","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Right to counsel; Remand (court procedure)","score_opus":0.023685569509992642,"score_gpt":0.25293871170625226,"score_spread":0.2292531421962596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1499115456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06485009,0.008604106,0.0019894745,0.2660979,0.0055016642,0.0006647447,0.004045598,0.00027711038,0.6479693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3218463,0.0029156597,0.002794904,0.11123001,0.00079319585,0.00038927823,0.0008132413,0.000285548,0.5589318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97644114,0.001512893,0.0007210258,0.002254907,0.008250361,0.010819726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9845918,0.0037516628,0.00033452702,0.0005645437,0.0070833494,0.0036741046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01006118,0.0010846474,0.0025216988,0.0027212002,0.05797685,0.024732849,0.006635359,0.031355113,0.020584377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027777784,0.0026428981,0.0018158038,0.0030370855,0.007976497,0.003343897,0.0055085793,0.032239877,0.0017612526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010138143,0.00007802164,0.0023103936,0.00006190518,0.00007088508,0.0009503223,0.0038227458,0.0004888361,0.0005088528,0.68872917,0.29483348,0.00804406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020989665,0.00003475638,0.013120624,0.00056097755,0.00019996987,0.0002188762,0.00593735,0.001520574,0.0012405623,0.044821035,0.9316801,0.00045528234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9929455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16245864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16245864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3629996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9714292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1499700966","doi":"10.21991/c9f66b","title":"IMPOVERISHMENT OF THE LAW BY THE LAW: A CRITIQUE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S VISION OF THE RULE OF LAW AND THE FEDERAL PRINCIPLE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.020252299983048484,"score_gpt":0.2229640320825438,"score_spread":0.20271173209949533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1499700966","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011843065,0.015960697,0.016312255,0.85241866,0.002909902,0.00004798088,0.00009836291,0.000056443874,0.10035266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6575856,0.008235167,0.0090004075,0.2896461,0.015851228,0.00039169376,0.00007566525,0.00028272247,0.018931322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95506555,0.021892851,0.0024553032,0.0055906163,0.011858761,0.0031368383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9213671,0.063743,0.0029812346,0.0037955134,0.006391518,0.0017215591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042110093,0.0008141642,0.003449148,0.003994651,0.013081936,0.018672787,0.0063493103,0.047973365,0.002972697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07425591,0.0015089011,0.0023952536,0.003488541,0.085948184,0.016849574,0.006659096,0.054972555,0.0007555586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000107339965,0.000014700541,0.00007862884,0.000019789704,0.000008518503,0.000029088982,0.0011366189,0.0001671105,0.00001806543,0.99005556,0.0068847514,0.0015765019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030362016,0.000010724897,0.00021749444,0.00012045447,0.000011676779,0.000034387915,0.0003632931,0.0003680129,0.000057289824,0.96894395,0.029818691,0.000023539316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039366495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02815895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047973365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020896062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025280729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22270215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1499908485","doi":"10.21991/c9mw9x","title":"LE DIPTYQUE CÔTÉ-ADAMS OU LA PRÉSÉANCE DE L’ORDRE ÉTABLI DANS LE DROIT POST-COLONIAL DES PEUPLES AUTOCHTONES","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Colonialism; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.026057964821221264,"score_gpt":0.22387699729349433,"score_spread":0.19781903247227306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1499908485","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90090775,0.0022531704,0.0002111919,0.0035198065,0.00006635974,0.000011736302,0.00007508344,0.0000047824415,0.09295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98105246,0.00045600746,0.00008791428,0.00014975574,0.000011228148,0.0000059042645,0.000012498614,0.0000054654497,0.018218627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991825,0.00021440724,0.000024745415,0.00008836981,0.00013633558,0.00035348226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887997,0.0005020202,0.00017250965,0.000053893746,0.00015280097,0.00023877363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008079851,0.00012133958,0.00014611188,0.0004990984,0.0046751034,0.002885959,0.00032191494,0.0005874895,0.0068956534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028748508,0.00020758064,0.0000629958,0.0011404973,0.0039139367,0.0010546267,0.001295855,0.0018078897,0.0002060414],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037299274,0.00005940197,0.036780167,0.00020705404,0.000018679113,0.0029945082,0.34857178,0.0003739544,0.004383884,0.54338366,0.005491118,0.05736287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004567571,0.000092297036,0.3161408,0.0004183426,0.0000274581,0.0009302719,0.13385409,0.00024032744,0.0026785533,0.008297795,0.5372131,0.00006128732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32998452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.60986555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32998452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008434796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006174581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6561276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1503359472","doi":"10.21991/c98q12","title":"HUNTING FOR ANSWERS IN A STRANGE KETTLE OF FISH: UNILATERALISM, PATERNALISM AND FIDUCIARY RHETORIC IN BADGER AND VAN DER PEET","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Historical Art and Culture Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kettle (birds); Paternalism; Badger; Rhetoric; Fiduciary; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Theology; Ecology","score_opus":0.04282530135862936,"score_gpt":0.22624778482486943,"score_spread":0.18342248346624007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1503359472","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20079707,0.013755493,0.01707581,0.25548902,0.0017600884,0.000067138404,0.00008590286,0.000057239413,0.5109122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810822,0.000556669,0.0013262695,0.0049269604,0.00022287657,0.00005536578,0.000012343154,0.00004484376,0.011772367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98476636,0.011935427,0.0002890072,0.00081922003,0.0011450641,0.0010449449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96956134,0.027509313,0.00089311344,0.0007267341,0.00081569393,0.0004938675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014803602,0.0005563985,0.00073500455,0.0026400427,0.0186053,0.018654931,0.0023557656,0.012501396,0.0052881246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027243488,0.0008800954,0.00047540548,0.003198896,0.0737002,0.022273336,0.0079348255,0.014020176,0.0003556708],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012765784,0.000012343263,0.00012769528,0.000017302853,0.0000028600407,0.000046854595,0.056124855,0.00004959774,0.000037392416,0.9395659,0.0026718313,0.0013306579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006128925,0.000020531501,0.0007321941,0.00022802211,0.000022178136,0.00013935217,0.098546185,0.00040194188,0.0005002989,0.7681387,0.13113916,0.00007019005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018139513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03031673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018654931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010842535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059159435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.078668416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1504041179","doi":"10.21991/c9d37c","title":"BEYOND THE FLIGHT FROM CONSTITUTIONAL LEGALISM: RETHINKING THE POLITICS OF SOCIAL POLICY POST-CHARLOTTETOWN","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legalism (Western philosophy); Politics; Constitution; Political science; Law; Constitutional law; Constitutional economics; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.031017979586912263,"score_gpt":0.277386561025107,"score_spread":0.24636858143819473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1504041179","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12059492,0.018705765,0.012510494,0.5397924,0.0025194844,0.000045019042,0.00008147426,0.00008090647,0.30566967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9642223,0.003821941,0.0015266704,0.018742781,0.000907004,0.000045750716,0.000016228352,0.00009151561,0.0106257405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99152875,0.0055286833,0.000119923934,0.0007065102,0.0010396359,0.0010763396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98711085,0.010681812,0.00039362328,0.00062307756,0.0006779898,0.0005126269],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014534069,0.000366671,0.00052396994,0.0025446876,0.012687968,0.017352298,0.0014372864,0.0076399,0.0040274328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016522992,0.0004623122,0.00037376996,0.0026967532,0.07830793,0.015509967,0.0076881135,0.013880589,0.0003382681],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008823142,0.0000067726132,0.0001235553,0.000013716079,0.0000018608602,0.000029463308,0.014261691,0.00015094444,0.000055007706,0.97918886,0.0025253487,0.003634001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017794508,0.000023042414,0.001578069,0.00037635225,0.000006331251,0.000027772912,0.014812517,0.0008165845,0.00031399977,0.7770218,0.20497653,0.00002913934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06552562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11032189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93447435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03407729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015629366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24724919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1504779803","doi":"10.21991/c9f67q","title":"A Constitutional Discussion of Participatory Democracy in Greece","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Democracy; Participatory democracy; Political science; Citizen journalism; Commission; European commission; Government (linguistics); Political economy; Public administration; Representative democracy; Politics; Law; European union; Economics; Economic policy","score_opus":0.04022751498258377,"score_gpt":0.33103568810612116,"score_spread":0.2908081731235374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1504779803","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12620828,0.012401383,0.009227147,0.1079535,0.0029260386,0.00026127067,0.00016542281,0.00009059332,0.74076635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9546851,0.0020795916,0.0015357852,0.010630904,0.0007262704,0.00019693232,0.000049735336,0.000037796974,0.030057762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9841055,0.009424141,0.0006156568,0.0017985,0.0021905662,0.0018655093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963367,0.002341431,0.0003236348,0.00048056635,0.00026199623,0.00025567802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012121385,0.00055433885,0.0007742115,0.0014607969,0.009155912,0.012708664,0.0025420734,0.011234074,0.0038012532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016341163,0.00036009244,0.0013584852,0.0022494197,0.023271734,0.0063397386,0.00814312,0.0069375476,0.0003882548],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005825995,0.000008056959,0.000094435774,0.00004468243,0.000008059841,0.00025143014,0.0030268468,0.00058480835,0.00008456139,0.99212146,0.0013749716,0.0023949011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006163347,0.00006587426,0.0016417499,0.0004683194,0.000018956991,0.00033132551,0.006660095,0.0012324068,0.00041321755,0.71830225,0.27074957,0.000054665874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013414477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008527942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013414477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011812497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010259448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.085706055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1506276622","doi":"10.21991/c94087","title":"THE SEARCH FOR REASONABLE LIMITS: IS OAKES RETIRED?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Retirement, Disability, and Employment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Econometrics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2586318622772972,"score_gpt":0.39526003368296647,"score_spread":0.1366281714056693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1506276622","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.120764,0.0073759267,0.0021976684,0.3936392,0.0020004686,0.00009900903,0.00048258234,0.000069208814,0.4733719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71775895,0.0023407456,0.0013337707,0.1675077,0.002324297,0.0003103863,0.00016799291,0.00008261645,0.10817356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898017,0.0031256746,0.0006223017,0.001161129,0.0018590798,0.0034301102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877273,0.008310666,0.0009426688,0.00066344836,0.0010773586,0.0012784998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024092162,0.0004002717,0.001197781,0.0013054014,0.013720501,0.011632753,0.003313991,0.024591627,0.012484043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034120392,0.0009783235,0.001003914,0.0016337539,0.008609815,0.009063684,0.0067780665,0.016186105,0.0014141424],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006991443,0.000071968156,0.0025220208,0.000045721234,0.000013651133,0.0006705662,0.0054945825,0.0001321758,0.00027665962,0.9057512,0.07583128,0.00912017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018329265,0.00016969428,0.017285645,0.0012626398,0.00013449282,0.00123562,0.03128271,0.001284022,0.0012850958,0.2867246,0.6589129,0.0002393308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07417115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13732032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07417115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059377276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013135437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14747888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1507271524","doi":"10.21991/c95t0s","title":"Legislators and Religious-Based Reasoning","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Politics; Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Political science; Government (linguistics); Action (physics); Rule of law; Sociology; Epistemology; Law and economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011594263062167053,"score_gpt":0.26505938803944007,"score_spread":0.253465124977273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1507271524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08013977,0.0034119284,0.029376006,0.13745664,0.0013852115,0.00010228305,0.00009672621,0.000110613866,0.7479209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9716352,0.0005922305,0.004194782,0.008884886,0.0004075818,0.0000546515,0.000037177568,0.00003289167,0.01416051],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9816412,0.012394096,0.00048462235,0.0016941238,0.0019200774,0.0018659183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980141,0.0140759,0.0014410923,0.0014845293,0.0018754436,0.0009819923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024285203,0.00026160353,0.0004794503,0.002484879,0.008874408,0.007166883,0.0023741042,0.007956212,0.009714226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031229464,0.00043091082,0.00075967744,0.0014826956,0.03626205,0.0071976436,0.0044928077,0.007456266,0.00084661454],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000400147,0.000009378169,0.00027700493,0.000010455033,0.00000476656,0.000042216438,0.00424457,0.0000656613,0.000034988778,0.992867,0.0010498512,0.0013901213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048648853,0.000012552891,0.0007144392,0.000117624804,0.000018011238,0.000058496047,0.003974987,0.00055010966,0.00021094245,0.91732544,0.076946594,0.000022139184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010764858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011439118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024285203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006469608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053635607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12843394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1508717189","doi":"10.21991/c9c65b","title":"SUPREME COURT SCEPTICAL ABOUT PRESUMPTION OF CROWN IMMUNITY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Supreme court; Skepticism; Qualified immunity; Sovereign immunity; Law; Political science; Crown (dentistry); Philosophy; Medicine; Epistemology","score_opus":0.056661407719705084,"score_gpt":0.3059521306292208,"score_spread":0.2492907229095157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1508717189","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04594227,0.0066440413,0.03418622,0.48869005,0.0042184195,0.00018827259,0.00077084464,0.0002127455,0.41914716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7802996,0.002541026,0.012720923,0.1743372,0.0030703463,0.00025322265,0.00019602156,0.00009917598,0.02648241],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9851194,0.002706733,0.0011344877,0.0024101473,0.006768621,0.0018604968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.968914,0.019012775,0.0019254694,0.00251216,0.0065649333,0.0010706462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022147425,0.00045901313,0.0012343234,0.002895653,0.0063336887,0.009142171,0.0051886593,0.018943692,0.0039235633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.070120156,0.00081345305,0.0013619141,0.0015317074,0.029330987,0.0071060876,0.0033137691,0.040503863,0.0010360423],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001608613,0.000017226752,0.00021989408,0.000030673364,0.000019168394,0.000082402585,0.0009872235,0.00023979113,0.00016087719,0.98292106,0.013328649,0.0019770907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000426351,0.0000132606965,0.0004360691,0.00021274535,0.000035017907,0.000067352106,0.0003784225,0.0008043311,0.0006385305,0.96433306,0.033005614,0.00003297672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019872395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017362919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022147425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008392215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013733767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11712819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1508932541","doi":"10.21991/c96q2t","title":"BEYOND ANDREWS: SUBSTANTIVE EQUALITY AND POSITIVE OBLIGATIONS AFTER ELDRIDGE AND VRIEND","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Disadvantaged; Disadvantage; Duty; Law; Political science; High Court; Section (typography); Law and economics; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.03609435680499443,"score_gpt":0.2900341658805447,"score_spread":0.25393980907555025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1508932541","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0182842,0.042593252,0.006474776,0.62441,0.006360328,0.00009663895,0.00015494949,0.000042479896,0.30158338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5878807,0.010496894,0.004091533,0.20253198,0.0041193017,0.00039530173,0.00008480801,0.00016187907,0.19023769],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874012,0.0050389874,0.00074582105,0.0016624641,0.0031116982,0.0020399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984925,0.010683461,0.00044382227,0.0011708157,0.0022004505,0.0005764469],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0143169435,0.0007019225,0.0012172207,0.0012256696,0.016816681,0.013640421,0.0027989247,0.023579951,0.010987097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026139785,0.0008411679,0.00100757,0.002207228,0.042518683,0.040023327,0.011654285,0.032112174,0.0011714051],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010500665,0.000012147598,0.00003058248,0.000017033894,0.0000022912157,0.000024377505,0.0027344155,0.000025431647,0.000033649718,0.9766183,0.018229092,0.0022623034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030503463,0.000012042357,0.0003304158,0.00019906582,0.0000117016,0.00003177908,0.004098226,0.00007318153,0.00024020283,0.8500745,0.14483875,0.00005953164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06836576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07965894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06836576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01662404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014144811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13593566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1509468823","doi":"10.21991/c9hm2k","title":"The Governor General’s Decision to Prorogue Parliament: A Chronology & Assessment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Constitution; Parallels; Politics; Political science; Law; Constitutional crisis; Representation (politics); Subject (documents); Action (physics); Government (linguistics); History; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.03866494258941048,"score_gpt":0.3167969669847738,"score_spread":0.2781320243953633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1509468823","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.103456035,0.07219698,0.002311623,0.15978566,0.009822752,0.0011914601,0.013156735,0.00019279832,0.637886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6422761,0.088804245,0.0059868675,0.03482116,0.0033518698,0.0011000147,0.0108806575,0.0003325059,0.21244663],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99055475,0.0013331258,0.00058108015,0.0005097574,0.00518702,0.0018342878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98583984,0.0018690482,0.0014113968,0.0002200548,0.00782753,0.0028321275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077318936,0.0005021392,0.00033480418,0.0094840415,0.008572985,0.01303488,0.0017253393,0.0042396584,0.014399426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019139579,0.00084628625,0.00034830114,0.014534193,0.003999311,0.0058425386,0.0029182339,0.0048084315,0.0029396957],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017728064,0.0001495657,0.03353316,0.0016961776,0.000028477329,0.0018479541,0.019110905,0.0006694982,0.0006219229,0.118352145,0.69594204,0.12787084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011415946,0.000028747374,0.034833796,0.00071810855,0.0000059129143,0.00017065108,0.014438611,0.00012539762,0.00015802901,0.0011950883,0.9482742,0.000040106213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71196896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84674555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28803104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051258318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06163316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5794546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510074182","doi":"10.21991/c99d4d","title":"L’activisme judiciaire, le prix de la transaction démocratique en Espagne","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01163452758851118,"score_gpt":0.264678791920187,"score_spread":0.2530442643316758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1510074182","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15338664,0.009826184,0.006184978,0.07682645,0.0006575974,0.000045418896,0.00007294648,0.000028761731,0.752971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.887896,0.002742783,0.00080679933,0.005324191,0.00021158563,0.000034182824,0.00003071422,0.000026100679,0.10292759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981236,0.0007849336,0.000037416565,0.00023285809,0.00034280942,0.00047841595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989189,0.00045974608,0.00015520412,0.00011058435,0.00018171487,0.00017389133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002078704,0.00030392146,0.000274657,0.0006082559,0.0064702355,0.007446423,0.0007152808,0.0028596637,0.0127693545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020984276,0.00020880681,0.00022178952,0.0009158454,0.0109788,0.0035435,0.0032277438,0.0043806145,0.0013441234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002550601,0.000015676153,0.0022269175,0.000045103876,0.0000071387294,0.00017317674,0.020435024,0.00009414765,0.0004342869,0.96033776,0.0036772152,0.012528018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004589515,0.00006797836,0.02012653,0.00072075153,0.000021548076,0.00035021192,0.055677384,0.00035040302,0.0010211639,0.17354572,0.7480261,0.000046477177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040480975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.068140045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040480975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055104187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005044428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08049071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1513173581","doi":"10.21991/c9dm31","title":"Insite: Site and Sight","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Jurisdiction; Sight; Law; Political science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.027761494307644824,"score_gpt":0.29261908705758033,"score_spread":0.2648575927499355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1513173581","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01517895,0.0007964475,0.00113153,0.03164476,0.00056492374,0.000027962964,0.00022693514,0.00009864172,0.95032984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42600107,0.0011030087,0.0010654036,0.026554065,0.0003459156,0.00006388195,0.00026724333,0.00026119733,0.5443382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980944,0.00020560266,0.00001718244,0.00019687529,0.0005270998,0.00095889805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990308,0.00017334022,0.00004085073,0.00009626293,0.00034389153,0.0003148028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091489643,0.0003959906,0.00035677754,0.00080627756,0.026233317,0.010960735,0.0017274043,0.0057129585,0.035748143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028127253,0.00032795523,0.00037894503,0.0009897335,0.0111928405,0.0039017512,0.0042931745,0.008938715,0.0031787388],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029609335,0.000021458394,0.0014953655,0.000029660945,0.000004789193,0.0007932175,0.0073770103,0.00007932292,0.00018937266,0.8180362,0.1637595,0.008184473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012256358,0.0000088980105,0.0012048437,0.0001234606,0.0000102294825,0.00035433474,0.0218434,0.00015853142,0.00034784983,0.028593488,0.9473136,0.000029136412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81230116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93740106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81230116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017841635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0330612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37760842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1513458610","doi":"10.21991/c9wd4p","title":"THE CASE OF THE MISSING RECORDS: R. V. CAROSELLA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"New Zealand Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Missing data; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.048323289153249266,"score_gpt":0.22078767185325754,"score_spread":0.17246438270000827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1513458610","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018118131,0.022520872,0.008902255,0.9294775,0.009439831,0.00006456304,0.0001429986,0.00006625883,0.027573925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14364602,0.027574029,0.018756736,0.75638926,0.022128507,0.0005319571,0.00014316734,0.0005212926,0.030309035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9303809,0.042592287,0.003136861,0.010263358,0.011175072,0.0024515365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7783136,0.1811272,0.005489615,0.015261067,0.017025515,0.0027828799],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08744461,0.0009565796,0.0030742341,0.0022032368,0.009274302,0.00822369,0.004787668,0.0332798,0.006266686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31635717,0.0011692725,0.0013970562,0.0034539008,0.020164615,0.01881666,0.0055940906,0.035700116,0.0026712853],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010733255,0.000017831866,0.0009663201,0.00026532248,0.00012416714,0.0008169032,0.0018679452,0.00075047446,0.00008883589,0.5272939,0.4454933,0.02220765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000111025154,0.000027865377,0.0005921802,0.0016731382,0.00012050484,0.0008577621,0.00086576684,0.0019894964,0.00038936888,0.6042682,0.38892025,0.00018433573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036425907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023983138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08744461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005535784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012820417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46245682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1515353485","doi":"10.21991/c9xm29","title":"Judges and Religious-Based Reasoning","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Legislature; Political science; Context (archaeology); Law; Democracy; Public reason; Establishment Clause; Set (abstract data type); Politics; Sociology; First amendment; Supreme court; Computer science","score_opus":0.01799064162263306,"score_gpt":0.29063592258352516,"score_spread":0.2726452809608921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1515353485","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.090185,0.0057964874,0.009699101,0.18568729,0.0015897689,0.00009564747,0.000063693566,0.000056399997,0.70682657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9715127,0.00071948656,0.0012689455,0.014087796,0.0004688781,0.000030976516,0.000017195507,0.000026052718,0.011867923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95135266,0.028843679,0.0012370491,0.002946641,0.008369699,0.0072503025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9661638,0.020468827,0.0028241929,0.0018053662,0.006004833,0.0027329428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038153365,0.00028459742,0.00061227,0.0021272697,0.018796084,0.014724663,0.0021760552,0.009624689,0.0061088544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05002576,0.0005183408,0.00071020424,0.0015675058,0.06071695,0.00665512,0.006866158,0.010869565,0.00071326125],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012577481,0.0000123603995,0.0008248467,0.000017492172,0.0000079349475,0.00013389676,0.008348497,0.00010016923,0.00009573249,0.9834598,0.004325077,0.00266164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010095078,0.000035831774,0.003223828,0.00036834602,0.000041855248,0.00014704496,0.013750855,0.0006188274,0.00043236648,0.80643964,0.1747548,0.000085527645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.088571325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12147339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.088571325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020617358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020579077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20177668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1515451775","doi":"10.21991/c9h960","title":"CANADA AFTER MEECH","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Caribbean history, culture, and politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.024754522402797095,"score_gpt":0.23951390487283541,"score_spread":0.2147593824700383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1515451775","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054755528,0.008759367,0.0006054608,0.07897572,0.012876664,0.00010672259,0.005141579,0.00042980872,0.8876291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016929625,0.0009978771,0.00024280694,0.00830576,0.00020939813,0.000021218097,0.0006255421,0.00015470678,0.9725131],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972378,0.00009205997,0.000044140874,0.00033392047,0.0010104117,0.0012817625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970968,0.00011396261,0.00008109817,0.00012185058,0.0017398971,0.00084649486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008703317,0.0005122025,0.00064122723,0.0012853912,0.013491781,0.010540658,0.0012108795,0.004421299,0.25829396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003599789,0.0004516114,0.00062242715,0.0024688565,0.0017888347,0.002511552,0.0027140419,0.0064283153,0.027017973],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063142346,0.000014614047,0.0006474415,0.00006762612,0.00001105926,0.0002639433,0.00017995252,0.0001067842,0.00016475948,0.060908306,0.9132049,0.024367541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061664996,0.00000256607,0.0009409181,0.00002415634,0.0000022446943,0.000025305248,0.00024398784,0.000021128351,0.00008781887,0.000645979,0.99799144,0.000008241473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9522655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97865385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9472751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052724894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.112887636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86407936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516154490","doi":"10.21991/c9jw99","title":"Reference re Supreme Court Act, ss 5 and 6 — Expanding the Constitution of Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Constitution; Political science; Original jurisdiction; Remand (court procedure); Majority opinion; Economic Justice; Certiorari; Court of equity; Precedent; Concurring opinion","score_opus":0.0322041707836593,"score_gpt":0.2834642513646748,"score_spread":0.2512600805810155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516154490","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0215546,0.0090614045,0.00175726,0.14287096,0.005326775,0.00058069243,0.011656675,0.0003679118,0.8068236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1980153,0.0047168634,0.005251729,0.1470979,0.0011622753,0.00045529378,0.0030619393,0.0002038889,0.6400348],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893217,0.0005065485,0.0002887555,0.0007030507,0.0055273487,0.0036526683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99338406,0.0009930783,0.00013581054,0.00032188246,0.0038316904,0.0013333613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004440757,0.00064237136,0.00063572236,0.0027996195,0.023536883,0.011527851,0.0033436203,0.0113077015,0.012555794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012112584,0.0009809415,0.0009764759,0.0029052373,0.004701571,0.0019802076,0.0025810306,0.010520435,0.001977455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047551894,0.00004782066,0.001841198,0.000058052923,0.000014243015,0.0002793012,0.002033873,0.0005164001,0.0006901853,0.3384575,0.64585096,0.010163015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033105604,0.000012032771,0.008539531,0.00017928291,0.00002561506,0.000034290664,0.0012150699,0.0002977488,0.00035594663,0.0075715203,0.9816487,0.00008721176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9947924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8833373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11666267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26781526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8464509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518267020","doi":"10.21991/c9sw9g","title":"CONSTRUCTING CANADIAN IDENTITIES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology; Genealogy; History","score_opus":0.029199811944035495,"score_gpt":0.23034248163721505,"score_spread":0.20114266969317957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1518267020","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036298364,0.0016187673,0.0055303737,0.026381133,0.00071216596,0.000092677605,0.00036256522,0.00012532106,0.9288786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76868266,0.0024076488,0.013655977,0.0034038622,0.00012012749,0.00016229459,0.00044638716,0.00026855676,0.21085237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99325126,0.0013813889,0.00014463162,0.0006499953,0.0020125702,0.0025601517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956529,0.00065591396,0.00013713093,0.00039965284,0.0022525704,0.0009019097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005115852,0.00092241523,0.00053015945,0.005595038,0.056877274,0.023003848,0.0023747978,0.0032664197,0.018233122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008773082,0.0006035339,0.0007138889,0.0064745746,0.0248961,0.0068594404,0.008880999,0.0055700806,0.0014783294],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000095451605,0.000005291707,0.00054183364,0.000016072221,0.00000394323,0.0000632955,0.023868106,0.00017859778,0.000079701895,0.94510007,0.019151224,0.010982313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008515964,0.000005992415,0.002156821,0.00018339526,0.000026887841,0.000059664606,0.07048872,0.00052945956,0.00035859895,0.1370851,0.7890224,0.00007443708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99011564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99191487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20060359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20060359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2309997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92718655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1519800358","doi":"10.21991/c9k37x","title":"CUSTOMS CENSORSHIP AND THE CHARTER: THE LITTLE SISTERS CASE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Business Law and Ethics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Censorship; Charter; Political science; Law; History","score_opus":0.042444995753292226,"score_gpt":0.21506359083402618,"score_spread":0.17261859508073396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1519800358","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34238645,0.0035098835,0.002136417,0.08066998,0.0004965504,0.00007135751,0.00008084346,0.00002129467,0.5706272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9490281,0.0008735666,0.00030923652,0.010746145,0.00031234746,0.000062058825,0.00002038936,0.000023115588,0.038625106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99622476,0.001282211,0.00011248929,0.00045887576,0.0007729761,0.0011486728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99375206,0.003995897,0.00051747053,0.00039406674,0.0003920665,0.0009483975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006410062,0.00027840628,0.0009275356,0.0016522352,0.015638407,0.009324181,0.001822456,0.014747697,0.012505577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017054364,0.00063256326,0.0006136663,0.002659496,0.020588348,0.009262406,0.0064171604,0.011878386,0.0005265119],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037742575,0.00003921247,0.0008088904,0.000011998931,0.000005273081,0.0005394192,0.004103769,0.00008826408,0.000065911285,0.985954,0.0052908785,0.0030546482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028171076,0.00012935138,0.0036527668,0.0004711821,0.00006674287,0.0011492894,0.020214858,0.0013683233,0.0005128823,0.83631104,0.13573207,0.000109801076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059212573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08332676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94078743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062762247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008323426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1177358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1522642859","doi":"10.21991/c9d093","title":"Canada’s Native Languages: The Right of First Nations to Educate Their Children in Their Own Languages","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biculturalism; Immigration; Neuroscience of multilingualism; Linguistics; First language; Political science; Sociology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011791186173491792,"score_gpt":0.23066307870612818,"score_spread":0.2188718925326364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1522642859","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10230332,0.0074565643,0.0009868089,0.11797463,0.0011259908,0.00008510053,0.0005704102,0.00009466663,0.7694025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8425552,0.0021160967,0.00093327963,0.016810944,0.00007505941,0.000036722708,0.00011818092,0.00005008296,0.13730437],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997609,0.00029692345,0.000038198643,0.00015500207,0.0005544108,0.0013464162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99765646,0.00037654818,0.00007360607,0.000094149065,0.0005511907,0.0012479692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019224562,0.00018926193,0.00017994441,0.00056122564,0.02177367,0.0048053265,0.0008827489,0.0026025095,0.007425002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034042508,0.00024301703,0.00013347014,0.00064857845,0.011332363,0.0010976394,0.0031320192,0.0042825616,0.00043322475],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027474818,0.000038397207,0.0068656174,0.000076780976,0.0000066332755,0.0006623323,0.090963505,0.00013796701,0.0006547461,0.6808416,0.16733964,0.052385308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000136136805,0.000012746424,0.014300915,0.00021814715,0.0000070723095,0.00020021133,0.03512901,0.000075185075,0.0003543131,0.009058744,0.9405875,0.000042647254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98775184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9954353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046675537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046675537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18111558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3386563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1523422130","doi":"10.21991/c9xw9q","title":"LA JUDICIARISATION DE LA POLITIQUE, LES DROITS DES MINORITES ET LE NATIONALISME CANADIEN*","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023436174379214053,"score_gpt":0.25673772874064077,"score_spread":0.23330155436142672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1523422130","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05701302,0.009779587,0.0036802085,0.07665782,0.0008221071,0.0000217711,0.00008729469,0.000045986246,0.8518922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8682698,0.0040614572,0.0007611656,0.007936313,0.00030200538,0.000033353874,0.000050547522,0.00006288456,0.11852249],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980996,0.0006306763,0.000033306187,0.00023528183,0.00043688001,0.0005642441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987081,0.0005804607,0.00013420667,0.00012739946,0.00022297738,0.00022681819],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013247859,0.00036822786,0.00029507017,0.00083896774,0.010172577,0.008905292,0.0009052779,0.0027126353,0.008650219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025333224,0.00015622424,0.00027983292,0.001604054,0.022549702,0.0034490856,0.0038694623,0.005358778,0.00084444444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009438476,0.000004554778,0.00043567966,0.000024690478,0.000003234991,0.000088969726,0.017504908,0.00005092217,0.00007946557,0.9710363,0.0065757036,0.0041860286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010691653,0.000016482181,0.0049028522,0.0003044825,0.000008851563,0.00020476787,0.028612882,0.00024368461,0.00036137353,0.21706206,0.7482399,0.000032055803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20389196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29527393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9871408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012859219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011370523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40541035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1524138988","doi":"10.21991/c9t674","title":"LA NATION, C’EST MOI: THE ENCOUNTER OF QUÉBEC AND ABORIGINAL NATIONALISMS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Referendum; Opposition (politics); Government (linguistics); Independence (probability theory); Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Ethnology; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01746300848833261,"score_gpt":0.2458057936903934,"score_spread":0.2283427852020608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1524138988","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32017693,0.02453682,0.0011735914,0.22725177,0.0011607175,0.00004653158,0.00031471485,0.000065749846,0.42527315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94779366,0.0029783256,0.0002932513,0.0075405017,0.000080728365,0.000020222687,0.00004282519,0.000026239852,0.041224107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99660623,0.0012433879,0.00003539921,0.00019738672,0.00058192335,0.0013356421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970414,0.0010470253,0.0001493659,0.000105191495,0.0007515751,0.0009054641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026460323,0.00021877291,0.00033729238,0.0013531755,0.042818386,0.010513643,0.0013267853,0.0031214429,0.008634099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036970591,0.00028348956,0.0002501462,0.002067541,0.022914726,0.0030514144,0.0035144764,0.0040591196,0.00029525565],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058483896,0.00003444937,0.007837475,0.00011637545,0.000024854895,0.0014098317,0.43883914,0.00024737662,0.00045059933,0.44493738,0.08246848,0.02357562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012390378,0.000017976356,0.015286947,0.0003627966,0.000019970614,0.0002714881,0.29892614,0.00024680968,0.00017969901,0.009543266,0.67505246,0.00008008269],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9941151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99784505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13018347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13018347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08776605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94455165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1524557742","doi":"10.21991/c9bt0b","title":"ABORIGINAL PEOPLES AND NAFTA: COLONIZATION CONTINUES TO RUN AMOK","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Colonization; Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01918210134228057,"score_gpt":0.2837901237154985,"score_spread":0.26460802237321795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1524557742","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77310824,0.021905618,0.000113769,0.07660668,0.00071102474,0.000033875105,0.000104433464,0.000012973692,0.1274033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9662774,0.0083664255,0.00019562888,0.0068394262,0.00017274021,0.00004665976,0.00006818647,0.0000122408055,0.01802124],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997726,0.00044828118,0.0000603171,0.0000894383,0.0002747332,0.0014011572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985489,0.00043911888,0.0002483093,0.00005686684,0.00026011452,0.0004466329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021610365,0.00019982437,0.00042984867,0.0008208053,0.021068145,0.007681626,0.00086477346,0.004507122,0.008041316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026667237,0.0002287565,0.00028839134,0.001635747,0.008299719,0.004519153,0.006840596,0.0034869185,0.00028384925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000371551,0.00018623131,0.07696798,0.0009450596,0.000080922,0.004203663,0.5546439,0.00009947911,0.0031478247,0.22305869,0.033095773,0.10319894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040107498,0.0001185264,0.14887986,0.0010456777,0.000067943234,0.00077218714,0.55628455,0.00005157636,0.00032687047,0.010355375,0.28199157,0.00006586062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3381771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6180232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3381771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00832195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025829135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6724174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1524833258","doi":"10.21991/c93h36","title":"Charter Checks and Parliamentary Balances","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Separation of powers; Orthodoxy; Law; Law and economics; Oxymoron; Power (physics); Democracy; Enumerated powers; Dictatorship; Political science; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0396831487486355,"score_gpt":0.26670781022178597,"score_spread":0.22702466147315048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1524833258","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.063180596,0.0029214302,0.012030718,0.023780717,0.00077616144,0.000085622,0.00026713827,0.00017019396,0.8967875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9500484,0.0007315848,0.0022741414,0.0025698217,0.00025665347,0.000058874837,0.00008668902,0.000065224536,0.043908697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98656285,0.0036389825,0.00043226226,0.0014718312,0.0048036035,0.0030905665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894342,0.0041844724,0.001595678,0.0012981559,0.002840949,0.00064663216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010147674,0.00033461498,0.00047307328,0.002963818,0.009853489,0.011154491,0.0015879067,0.0026169082,0.009207647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031907603,0.0003742866,0.0002824673,0.0028904811,0.025294028,0.0056566726,0.0036957716,0.004243096,0.00071386714],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006463817,0.0000020080306,0.0001566377,0.0000063436096,0.0000012375108,0.000008488023,0.000740353,0.00009894413,0.000040539457,0.99471045,0.0015592522,0.0026691896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006588972,0.000039308023,0.0059207906,0.00024907567,0.000028832012,0.000050117986,0.0028626567,0.0009997191,0.0012048248,0.6362653,0.35223913,0.00007440027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17388403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20380253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98154104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018458955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024297606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34574383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W152532952","doi":"10.21991/c9pd56","title":"FROM “INDIANS” TO “FIRST NATIONS”: CHANGING ANGLO-CANADIAN PERCEPTIONS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN INDIAN IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY*","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Constitution; Treaty; Nationalism; Federalism; Political science; Section (typography); Gender studies; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.014066612821296062,"score_gpt":0.22354149368159773,"score_spread":0.20947488086030167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W152532952","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72894853,0.017217463,0.0003063563,0.06072941,0.0007118278,0.000047557503,0.00024263638,0.000036288486,0.19175991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97265977,0.007296294,0.00016417615,0.0053032963,0.000067055196,0.000015440133,0.00006718283,0.000028072232,0.014398789],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965598,0.000581595,0.00006651566,0.00020349017,0.0010716866,0.0015168781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99658406,0.00054148404,0.00024453507,0.00006181288,0.0012662206,0.0013018827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029543051,0.00035154432,0.0003472203,0.0030923088,0.036356762,0.009887942,0.0013685719,0.0013765005,0.003835434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037799948,0.00028137953,0.00021037918,0.0045132814,0.017142113,0.002850838,0.004049868,0.004595567,0.00024524785],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046838468,0.00002377861,0.01150864,0.00010152126,0.000010428674,0.00042506645,0.93299514,0.00003203331,0.00044964137,0.027866354,0.011089325,0.015451207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004979251,0.00001557987,0.022057533,0.0001873798,0.000014930041,0.00016463733,0.81346095,0.00003306359,0.00010362345,0.00096803054,0.16293962,0.000049657003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99039537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9953284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.068825506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.068825506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06015399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49936634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526342888","doi":"10.21991/c9r67h","title":"Charkaoui: Beyond Anti-Terrorism, Procedural Fairness, and Section 7 of the Charter","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Terrorism; Political science; Law; Immigration; Government (linguistics); Section (typography); Refugee; Business","score_opus":0.03484792083386847,"score_gpt":0.2658367904835917,"score_spread":0.23098886964972323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526342888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04784275,0.0112353545,0.0059758467,0.2594419,0.0017198502,0.00016341638,0.00041922057,0.00012514091,0.67307645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86396503,0.0037136988,0.0057320087,0.06577536,0.0010179125,0.00016667371,0.0002626811,0.000070826936,0.05929586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98138475,0.0031274802,0.0004024705,0.0010143381,0.0091687245,0.0049022664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98148406,0.008057956,0.0011841501,0.0010116419,0.006771212,0.0014908939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014759722,0.00037108516,0.0006703329,0.0017239413,0.014334631,0.012349533,0.00270274,0.009408745,0.004006849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02474523,0.0004088984,0.0004166758,0.001598659,0.022395073,0.0036235203,0.0026495643,0.013985697,0.0005254674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024238312,0.000013660015,0.0010752255,0.000039473904,0.000006706785,0.00010583347,0.0017418073,0.00012526453,0.000111867834,0.9607271,0.027756004,0.008272882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009920037,0.000049281145,0.011885575,0.0011582992,0.00008578177,0.00020783248,0.005390595,0.0013167494,0.0016633918,0.52152985,0.4564361,0.00017742084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8314179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8961625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16858208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04215863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14785208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33914977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1527938502","doi":"10.21991/c9538k","title":"Applying the Burden of Proof and Creating Connections to Communities","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Burden of proof; Arbitrariness; Proof of concept; Epistemology; Law and economics; Sociology; Economic Justice; Computer science; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04185386996911755,"score_gpt":0.2998754247963839,"score_spread":0.25802155482726635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1527938502","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04430354,0.005218856,0.34548795,0.28966168,0.0021279554,0.0003679817,0.00010922944,0.0002022565,0.31252053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9306589,0.0014082497,0.04633018,0.008709915,0.0012791805,0.0005271648,0.000033069642,0.00012928435,0.010924182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.91258794,0.06484564,0.002846685,0.006331459,0.009978692,0.0034096346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8371031,0.12021189,0.008233008,0.023254625,0.007725483,0.00347188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09715951,0.0010765089,0.0017944974,0.004964032,0.013178001,0.023623258,0.004964652,0.019359194,0.009559164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16801535,0.0012452399,0.0015134058,0.0019064621,0.12110245,0.059781924,0.03096122,0.0196334,0.001112398],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000299634,0.0000028550244,0.000047166322,0.000010935997,0.0000028535599,0.00003199045,0.0015482759,0.00006884639,0.000025873325,0.99675876,0.00041969906,0.0010798158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000999883,0.000006958733,0.000033513592,0.000067413916,0.000004288595,0.000044921184,0.00081142056,0.00028656967,0.000098847486,0.98610234,0.012524353,0.000009400586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001948701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013438783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09715951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007048581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008558371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5138347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1528129522","doi":"10.21991/c9w37q","title":"CANADIAN MULTICULTURALISM IN HISTORICAL AND COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE: IS CANADA UNIQUE?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Diversity (politics); Perspective (graphical); Cultural diversity; Ethnic group; Sociology; Political science; Law; Gender studies","score_opus":0.052979621379145,"score_gpt":0.2848957647658698,"score_spread":0.2319161433867248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1528129522","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08332636,0.10578577,0.0007610908,0.3254216,0.0028269945,0.000046410187,0.0010275118,0.000055167257,0.48074907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90327495,0.041307893,0.0012095178,0.015937181,0.0004473204,0.00004187954,0.00031368344,0.000071102324,0.03739635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99658906,0.00057108,0.00005905247,0.0002807379,0.0008206317,0.0016793493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956821,0.0010107971,0.00020003869,0.00012732319,0.0018451676,0.0011344707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032324076,0.00037227693,0.0005593027,0.0055671497,0.047706444,0.013134733,0.0023119014,0.003098916,0.0076507637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056093927,0.00027093987,0.00031265724,0.013704984,0.016948208,0.003814719,0.0029241254,0.004045043,0.00022625804],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038801387,0.000024986612,0.005997305,0.00027692615,0.000022058284,0.0005186995,0.07466744,0.00025561362,0.00013489829,0.75504297,0.12580413,0.037216134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008346041,0.000010045554,0.018060422,0.0007886662,0.00002817579,0.0001954993,0.11046712,0.0002693805,0.00014395913,0.021056548,0.8488902,0.00008176427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99666095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23296046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23296046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21374702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88965714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1530969327","doi":"10.21991/c90q1k","title":"Invalidity and Retrospectivity under the Irish and Canadian Constitutions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Irish; Legislation; Law; Statute; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Computer science","score_opus":0.06189011535806788,"score_gpt":0.28688165926465836,"score_spread":0.22499154390659049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1530969327","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3117675,0.0036738103,0.008190233,0.04981841,0.00077273673,0.00017487424,0.0006048944,0.00007709255,0.6249205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834389,0.0008072264,0.0014624917,0.0026778502,0.00011869426,0.000040891024,0.00012298014,0.000039250102,0.011291758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9673478,0.0064266576,0.0015450729,0.0031996917,0.014662284,0.0068183644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95098764,0.023510957,0.0038757587,0.0035766442,0.016719975,0.0013290037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031902395,0.00027854304,0.00078358926,0.006635236,0.018036399,0.015223094,0.0027434456,0.0035614616,0.002782667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07980677,0.0005158347,0.0006160364,0.007577137,0.064467974,0.0055167694,0.006936309,0.008439643,0.00021326706],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035642763,0.0000072188086,0.003088757,0.00003354445,0.000010192081,0.00025168658,0.053086523,0.00014611022,0.00016296774,0.93223846,0.0025429178,0.008395904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077231256,0.000049985654,0.032077286,0.0005932913,0.00023077069,0.000649646,0.12257202,0.0013694674,0.0019231753,0.4456829,0.39439404,0.0003801818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7927959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8192988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2072041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.065598115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07466607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47594988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1531815374","doi":"10.21991/c9t95d","title":"WALDMAN V. CANADA: RELIGOUS DISCRIMINATION IN THE CONSTITITUON","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.03496752046064982,"score_gpt":0.266479316802001,"score_spread":0.23151179634135116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1531815374","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13408962,0.0149616385,0.00088556344,0.33758757,0.0011816489,0.0001843574,0.0017063196,0.0000787155,0.5093246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71690595,0.0066530206,0.0009571802,0.111556895,0.0002936044,0.0001323611,0.00027035596,0.00006532521,0.16316532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946883,0.0004503629,0.00009465924,0.00023199558,0.0018822412,0.0026525243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99604934,0.0008319779,0.0002313376,0.00009158672,0.0014066567,0.0013891585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024025193,0.00039792294,0.00045853248,0.0015276129,0.03475954,0.007602674,0.0021207258,0.009467974,0.007842065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007746346,0.00052713737,0.0005192559,0.002995559,0.0070877145,0.0015536692,0.0029186113,0.0078218775,0.00045733247],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000101162295,0.00007308278,0.018322874,0.00011646529,0.000036915844,0.0014582194,0.013694247,0.00045436007,0.00069189793,0.6381992,0.30219498,0.02465654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020356667,0.000048389287,0.076398075,0.0009796276,0.0001434697,0.00050445116,0.025196174,0.0010072895,0.0012390784,0.036736935,0.8572674,0.00027553682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99686784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99879587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9089452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.091054805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2613285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6606519},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1532977085","doi":"10.21991/c99663","title":"SOVIET CONSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENTS: ALEXANDER M. IAKOVLEVEV IN CONVERSATION WITH L.C. GREEN","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Scientific Research and Philosophical Inquiry","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.07384744291897405,"score_gpt":0.26739272532246344,"score_spread":0.1935452824034894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1532977085","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014884969,0.053409874,0.000650296,0.89820963,0.017335936,0.000007539652,0.00008035051,0.000028225248,0.028789518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16138923,0.086057715,0.0018578958,0.61151654,0.044127,0.0001261409,0.00025377367,0.00026937944,0.094402455],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99595743,0.0018462616,0.00022648337,0.0006367498,0.0008187628,0.00051431655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99437875,0.004319334,0.00029497407,0.00011312856,0.00045440232,0.00043947657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008073966,0.00065956713,0.0012735,0.0012820142,0.010042812,0.008829168,0.001413855,0.012697965,0.0057856007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011778959,0.00056041346,0.00053748407,0.002627462,0.0058514113,0.009328441,0.00398036,0.019949134,0.0014728116],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023723664,0.000020815532,0.00019567301,0.00010482306,0.0000082663555,0.00012366733,0.0039085615,0.0001398204,0.00008468624,0.16977872,0.8187215,0.006889829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000105288955,0.000008643852,0.0004203868,0.00026528083,0.000007655516,0.00007921646,0.0019707896,0.00011850703,0.00016413657,0.037297152,0.95962983,0.00002783463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00914819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0145501485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012697965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008046928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049771545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058384776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1533649643","doi":"10.21991/c9n65t","title":"THE FEDERAL ELECTORAL REGIME CONFRONTS THE CHARTER ... AGAIN: A COMMENT ON SOMERVILLE V. CANADA (A.G.)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.025046527575498183,"score_gpt":0.21088040081637544,"score_spread":0.18583387324087725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1533649643","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0045487033,0.0047012516,0.00029117544,0.91070217,0.0064201774,0.000091756636,0.0013062962,0.00012858471,0.07180991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024167705,0.0017163679,0.0003846653,0.9077665,0.0019186401,0.000067537745,0.0002097531,0.000087577544,0.06368119],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98751473,0.00089777086,0.00046542927,0.0011537493,0.005089091,0.0048791547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908544,0.0029698112,0.0005054665,0.00028010565,0.004014682,0.0013755672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062689963,0.0013143972,0.0017606332,0.0019792316,0.041838348,0.011579245,0.008676503,0.07459859,0.010988942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013979491,0.0018453607,0.0033402105,0.003831428,0.010798097,0.003247633,0.0027188873,0.04668119,0.0028499353],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039604296,0.000018375444,0.0007980106,0.000053529806,0.000023552137,0.0003248811,0.0017253658,0.00011816592,0.00027749312,0.024141528,0.969923,0.002556569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010785255,0.000031080348,0.008140161,0.00041773517,0.00013764105,0.00015398742,0.0044697504,0.00032657603,0.000833802,0.005736288,0.9793743,0.00027077954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98150545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9922476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08444747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08444747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12961544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61271214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1535369152","doi":"10.21991/c9c09s","title":"The Constitution Act, 1982: the Foreseen and Unforeseen","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Writ; Law; Delegation; Political science; Repatriation; Economic Justice; Prime minister; Work (physics); Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.03976722809875146,"score_gpt":0.2728279921872436,"score_spread":0.2330607640884921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1535369152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052491356,0.06993153,0.0010687205,0.3577137,0.0069025736,0.0001042077,0.0047964426,0.00014873677,0.5068426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33776718,0.030009577,0.002538333,0.08740494,0.001999378,0.00047565377,0.0022782236,0.00012521367,0.5374015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99580777,0.0008646472,0.0001954824,0.00045886546,0.0018686526,0.00080460584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963954,0.0015118466,0.00028774407,0.00030510488,0.0010518959,0.00044797163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003999456,0.0005061984,0.00038211409,0.0014838518,0.0069421125,0.010091987,0.0010447527,0.0084132245,0.010080033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014813899,0.0005682394,0.00023169504,0.0050534946,0.006682205,0.004849674,0.0029663201,0.008451079,0.003535923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007547717,0.000045606786,0.002488281,0.00019360686,0.000010510218,0.00038939915,0.005655716,0.00032621593,0.0006653031,0.5904097,0.3607082,0.039031968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024655961,0.000016322632,0.015807228,0.0004790384,0.00001114899,0.000066116496,0.0026804165,0.00011312068,0.00023980533,0.019744739,0.96078485,0.00003246691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3012111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57312804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97909003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020909987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03902783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5989157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1536077555","doi":"10.21991/c9gm28","title":"THE CANADA CLAUSE THAT WAS: HOW COURTS USE INTERPRETIVE CLAUSES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dependent clause; Establishment Clause; Non-finite clause; Linguistics; Law; Political science; First amendment; Supreme court; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03478920550353464,"score_gpt":0.21050006559354728,"score_spread":0.17571086009001263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1536077555","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03388571,0.0026792868,0.01964188,0.09091391,0.0010275512,0.00026327986,0.00089615723,0.00021636992,0.8504759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81722814,0.0018610518,0.012967347,0.02954633,0.00031277814,0.00021759435,0.0003802916,0.00061500137,0.13687138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97037214,0.0067757773,0.00087359635,0.0024443993,0.011875511,0.0076585496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9725781,0.010754887,0.0007903975,0.0015117931,0.012870607,0.0014941916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013622201,0.00069971685,0.0007493743,0.0034922992,0.025876775,0.028434202,0.0044013434,0.009536411,0.010771806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05477516,0.0016105467,0.0009228706,0.0059140176,0.0271957,0.012053029,0.0040102056,0.015919922,0.001038495],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008233596,0.0000078061785,0.00052512035,0.00001721663,0.000009667717,0.00006955885,0.006275166,0.00021902334,0.00012749081,0.96914107,0.020394895,0.0032047445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009909429,0.000014971348,0.0059614507,0.0005165063,0.00014568557,0.00013492563,0.022975074,0.0027408225,0.0022773296,0.24660507,0.71821445,0.0003146013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98647773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9874071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16712862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16712862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22897957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9660127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1536794624","doi":"10.21991/c9wh4q","title":"ROADBLOCKS IN THE WAY OF CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.06579481639080617,"score_gpt":0.2865437377199745,"score_spread":0.22074892132916832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1536794624","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008134061,0.0129988175,0.055118725,0.7359839,0.005377285,0.00017673796,0.00017750653,0.00029324158,0.18173963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7954187,0.009812016,0.031845164,0.09478773,0.0063008685,0.0008477226,0.00021765417,0.0006383576,0.060131736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9205167,0.050357398,0.0023769794,0.005541616,0.01513268,0.006074711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8921506,0.0752419,0.0024277137,0.011799218,0.012681707,0.005698959],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06224999,0.000879838,0.0023710525,0.0033676,0.01498337,0.0285595,0.004454127,0.017140241,0.023115577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.111641444,0.0012488449,0.001791906,0.0024929435,0.09335085,0.049331643,0.014741954,0.038937733,0.0036873498],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012256228,0.000012579344,0.000044957033,0.000034005163,0.0000054632405,0.000016595806,0.000577618,0.00016780652,0.000021272725,0.99074906,0.005401836,0.0029565142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015454392,0.000007754425,0.00003825064,0.000056342516,0.0000028686995,0.0000166095,0.00055392465,0.00020053222,0.00004741051,0.9590496,0.039998464,0.0000128178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011408477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008609086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06224999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015978362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02698744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32921332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1537107893","doi":"10.21991/c91w9n","title":"L’abolition du registre des armes d’épaule : le rôle potentiel des principes non écrits","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Institutions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.014028327057731264,"score_gpt":0.2084832883972059,"score_spread":0.19445496133947462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1537107893","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15673605,0.004736918,0.022081152,0.06481741,0.0013250263,0.00020852243,0.0004783773,0.0002811413,0.7493354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8603779,0.00087363046,0.0053531285,0.005884063,0.00024411832,0.00011461003,0.0000828262,0.00011125984,0.12695852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887918,0.0024128354,0.00042427986,0.0018410335,0.0039258827,0.0026041812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906098,0.0029259226,0.00050800294,0.0020793,0.0034066015,0.0004702392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011053198,0.00041940538,0.00061917736,0.0014846786,0.0126084825,0.013396751,0.0031298506,0.0065719686,0.007719206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018473566,0.00073126605,0.00078274624,0.0014735297,0.021406913,0.0042990367,0.0034547104,0.008839376,0.0007755177],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017348291,0.00001099958,0.00077124406,0.000031028183,0.000010489707,0.000056341993,0.0026137296,0.00027627937,0.00036951338,0.982906,0.0054979837,0.0074390657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001143262,0.00007830333,0.017303227,0.0004588027,0.0001393127,0.00021146578,0.0065271365,0.0023417356,0.0050706384,0.23363504,0.73392,0.00019995648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66928726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7688541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33071274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03519846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.057060443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66532075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1537497923","doi":"10.21991/c9kx1x","title":"Reforming the Upper House: Lessons from Britain","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Legitimacy; Commission; House of Representatives; White (mutation); Political science; Electoral reform; Public administration; Commons; Law; Democracy; Parliament; Politics","score_opus":0.022558044728193775,"score_gpt":0.29054297846107,"score_spread":0.26798493373287624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1537497923","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14308406,0.025838308,0.0021023802,0.22436178,0.001355603,0.00007098775,0.0001304288,0.000074938616,0.6029815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.850573,0.008459477,0.0013269108,0.025358083,0.00029276736,0.000057932433,0.000102266335,0.00008244647,0.1137472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955303,0.0018345776,0.00010065084,0.00036394355,0.0006645332,0.0015059807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99786276,0.00078747683,0.00010400669,0.00028748214,0.00037393093,0.0005844602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004124621,0.00027910687,0.00055570103,0.0007292208,0.008509992,0.008307371,0.001346231,0.005189307,0.013757899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006688598,0.00029675447,0.00033392917,0.0019216714,0.012016252,0.004762664,0.0047814604,0.004830549,0.0013850261],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071446906,0.000121130644,0.0010434847,0.00017442928,0.000010023832,0.00043378942,0.016591867,0.0006557831,0.00032540847,0.89908993,0.03848781,0.042995017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000097909775,0.0000778149,0.0058457684,0.0005312303,0.000016728436,0.00010697814,0.01690291,0.00050120027,0.00044966265,0.1661665,0.80926055,0.00004277235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.323062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34900263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.323062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021007337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012390172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64236313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W153819658","doi":"10.21991/c97d4s","title":"THE ISRAELI CONSTITUTION AND THE FIGHT AGAINST TERRORISM","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Terrorism; Politics; Political science; Law; Democracy; State (computer science); Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.023363858370951934,"score_gpt":0.25583364359460775,"score_spread":0.23246978522365583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W153819658","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04435256,0.023048528,0.0010986483,0.074775755,0.00087602943,0.000027985445,0.00014198174,0.000028195984,0.8556503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94043046,0.007223889,0.0006651478,0.007360665,0.0010293614,0.00004466436,0.000106378684,0.000024613251,0.043114733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901676,0.00040458163,0.000026535554,0.00008304885,0.0001714826,0.00029756542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941945,0.0002697336,0.000074071766,0.000042771728,0.000089074674,0.00010489617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017208823,0.00021644519,0.0002262533,0.0010469357,0.003973589,0.005480288,0.00052641984,0.0035819989,0.0076726535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019445793,0.00013511705,0.00017436336,0.00065850414,0.010985767,0.0024836715,0.0020590806,0.0026551674,0.0006642134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008348949,0.000013926552,0.00022147446,0.000011749632,0.000003312575,0.000050969298,0.000835592,0.00012496741,0.000058558206,0.9858737,0.007280195,0.00551718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004910182,0.000018808969,0.0021109602,0.000289349,0.000008420897,0.00010502372,0.0023941891,0.00036332043,0.00016801497,0.66019946,0.33427444,0.000018995308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010063868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014003173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010063868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051807743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03758931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1538598330","doi":"10.21991/c9508j","title":"FIRST NATIONS AND ABORIGINAL RIGHTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Human rights; Law","score_opus":0.022297789525906803,"score_gpt":0.2816161481952896,"score_spread":0.2593183586693828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1538598330","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022365302,0.007550318,0.00047028135,0.025269672,0.0006583665,0.000027721777,0.00006068671,0.000011559771,0.9435861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.619324,0.007399433,0.0016737725,0.012325858,0.0008226784,0.00018747445,0.00010311995,0.00004122196,0.35812244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952591,0.0018884292,0.0001237564,0.00035708683,0.00064913207,0.0017225838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967745,0.0017367656,0.00020469731,0.00036862702,0.0004249034,0.00049048965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049488875,0.00037409115,0.0006271265,0.0012964458,0.01604184,0.009616067,0.0010859205,0.007178673,0.01569421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066056172,0.0004019375,0.00038010714,0.0015815308,0.020777283,0.0045019216,0.0055706697,0.009022403,0.0008859158],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054749667,0.000010354377,0.00017088577,0.000021155325,0.0000031748987,0.000081932725,0.010919686,0.000021209748,0.000043579133,0.98123795,0.0048962403,0.0025883662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000341086,0.000044109263,0.005287653,0.0006101832,0.00003221414,0.00030572232,0.023101993,0.00008558938,0.0002512006,0.4552449,0.51495934,0.000043018536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.120341174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2068517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.120341174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006728118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011969745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23928142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1538953595","doi":"10.21991/c9q676","title":"Conditions Under Which Québec Prefers a Strong Federal Government, or Why Decentralization is not Necessarily a Good Thing for Québec","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Decentralization; Nothing; Government (linguistics); Identity (music); Work (physics); Political science; Cooperative federalism; Sociology; Law; Art; Engineering; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Politics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05880536777569353,"score_gpt":0.3017641712255371,"score_spread":0.24295880344984358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1538953595","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3567239,0.0047368724,0.0018532381,0.26653743,0.00044784485,0.00012806972,0.0021230842,0.00011634844,0.36733317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97027236,0.00059719983,0.00045327467,0.0082428,0.000031149295,0.000017688077,0.00019016764,0.00002130897,0.02017418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969584,0.0005047626,0.000062302846,0.00034358696,0.0005291037,0.0016018833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949809,0.000790154,0.00040527244,0.00023585772,0.0021374512,0.0014503907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027490165,0.00014586604,0.00025012236,0.0008528904,0.010760197,0.0085285185,0.00085900247,0.0018400145,0.018853093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077340486,0.00015543909,0.00025866306,0.0015382621,0.005012519,0.0024185518,0.0010841319,0.0022897709,0.00055524067],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029528834,0.00009679413,0.08682015,0.00035231782,0.000115071016,0.00070173555,0.014243992,0.0015693132,0.0029566311,0.64214253,0.20007801,0.050628193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000111117886,0.00009788517,0.33306152,0.0011500525,0.00012965316,0.00031381767,0.07468927,0.0021613012,0.001724018,0.036637787,0.5496682,0.00025528285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9829931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9954816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07464907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07464907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06821382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5416195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1539272870","doi":"10.21991/c9mt16","title":"M V. H: TIME TO CLEAN UP YOUR ACTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Race, History, and American Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science","score_opus":0.0411475845142006,"score_gpt":0.28162091715183485,"score_spread":0.24047333263763426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1539272870","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033282153,0.0017621319,0.009522779,0.13234304,0.037795752,0.0005918128,0.000769225,0.004567624,0.8093194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022120276,0.0004795765,0.004000259,0.04296318,0.0026633218,0.00027187786,0.0003046409,0.0013166815,0.9258802],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99654937,0.0006985579,0.00013382618,0.00029356708,0.0012805632,0.0010440684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946695,0.0010383831,0.00032090748,0.0005348364,0.0015442506,0.0018921313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036849089,0.000622192,0.0005792017,0.0010490158,0.008944112,0.0071316687,0.0013951734,0.009505348,0.19227721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01976754,0.000729184,0.0008330843,0.00033733158,0.0020471185,0.0047278553,0.0052092816,0.011611505,0.13025728],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025055484,0.00003240504,0.000161605,0.000026279642,0.0000027432109,0.00012643689,0.00053804927,0.000029339295,0.0003813143,0.016119573,0.96167946,0.020877646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012052139,0.000022437993,0.00046563643,0.00004936874,0.0000023217608,0.000056472298,0.000731784,0.00005190212,0.0004048049,0.0029633804,0.99522203,0.0000178844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010087758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021049753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19227721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024574976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007830504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64323133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542062513","doi":"10.21991/c9hm16","title":"CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM IN SOUTH AFRICA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Geography; Development economics; Economics","score_opus":0.05168537418911047,"score_gpt":0.2833531090796398,"score_spread":0.23166773489052933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1542062513","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42754495,0.051708754,0.0019769936,0.1024191,0.00074919296,0.00052637263,0.0002665116,0.00004853967,0.41475964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9637748,0.0070749237,0.0009104147,0.004235336,0.00014548343,0.00017113861,0.000039428007,0.000018719846,0.023629893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99668103,0.0011827219,0.00017329441,0.00021450613,0.00031938835,0.0014289973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979372,0.0010302132,0.0003016787,0.00017112422,0.0002528261,0.00030705048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003812579,0.00045200015,0.00058532844,0.0023660362,0.013483477,0.0065967613,0.0007359167,0.0030027865,0.00863765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077496124,0.00048507834,0.0004006594,0.0038927048,0.009937958,0.00352258,0.0061296327,0.004897921,0.00033889493],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007514247,0.00005559353,0.0016974305,0.0004678282,0.00003107802,0.0012045783,0.026214521,0.0007480377,0.0015605075,0.93934107,0.0057444945,0.022859812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023540061,0.00018657307,0.044821385,0.0022980561,0.00014867628,0.0008332896,0.046300314,0.00093996327,0.0025461055,0.23136407,0.67021525,0.000110894616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05872547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10440405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05872547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018586572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026672853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13485569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W154298146","doi":"10.21991/c9k66k","title":"FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION - LABOUR STRIKES OUT AGAIN","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Mathematics and Applications","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of association; Association (psychology); Economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology; Human rights","score_opus":0.05945372667446369,"score_gpt":0.28788905066399145,"score_spread":0.22843532398952776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W154298146","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013148047,0.0005838218,0.008929623,0.020350412,0.0020094775,0.00011707421,0.00031012396,0.00011944,0.9544319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4255409,0.00035266244,0.0026204863,0.014409002,0.0015942715,0.00046738368,0.0003229496,0.00031184495,0.5543805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9851555,0.002798283,0.0008777165,0.0028153046,0.0035131588,0.0048399316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915793,0.0032001042,0.00027856955,0.0023699233,0.0012762343,0.0012958364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009308922,0.00089741754,0.0029034228,0.001543539,0.018206054,0.018314479,0.003042544,0.019595781,0.0429231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022712406,0.0012499434,0.0024116875,0.0016569006,0.012561654,0.010287165,0.011927002,0.035560302,0.012235165],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042544616,0.000039752194,0.00011055817,0.00001224675,0.000010456177,0.000056539146,0.00071083254,0.00011505465,0.00022282687,0.98731285,0.008707805,0.0026586177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010182366,0.000040357445,0.0010000942,0.000120454286,0.000029981042,0.00011233926,0.0010061535,0.0004267194,0.00058867846,0.75921637,0.23728815,0.00006887244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0125469705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015350754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0429231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066938023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010578397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14359206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1543043721","doi":"10.21991/c98s9s","title":"NOVEL CONCEPTS: A COMMENT ON EGAN AND NESBIT V. THE QUEEN","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Art; Biology; Zoology","score_opus":0.041116598682663624,"score_gpt":0.2977348988346435,"score_spread":0.25661830015197984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1543043721","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00046490782,0.0014573296,0.0002540111,0.9767744,0.007415831,0.000014766111,0.00010296357,0.00001751612,0.013498356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009257343,0.0006793148,0.00039467003,0.9714959,0.0071046636,0.00007332214,0.00003388356,0.000040052575,0.010920758],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98348147,0.004332758,0.0013000164,0.0024477737,0.006149089,0.0022889108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9736485,0.018046204,0.0017412218,0.00089664996,0.004392274,0.0012751503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023380967,0.0011622421,0.002014437,0.0013662721,0.01791909,0.0112334285,0.010278139,0.097781256,0.00876039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045695465,0.001506657,0.0024664737,0.0022322682,0.024316588,0.013748901,0.0073320186,0.07736054,0.0035595396],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033813376,0.000016352484,0.00009013049,0.00008025298,0.000009663832,0.00024232012,0.0025982955,0.000048587677,0.00012182414,0.19808061,0.79729754,0.0013806663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006481991,0.000016108692,0.00030606132,0.00029559142,0.000019748228,0.00018766586,0.0022987067,0.000121991034,0.00033594904,0.05700445,0.9392808,0.00006812596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05390036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0725666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.097781256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015518247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021436535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12365186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1546927699","doi":"10.21991/c9nm2t","title":"STRENGTHENING THE ECONOMIC UNION: THE CHARTER AND THE AGREEMENT ON INTERNAL TRADE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitution; Political science; Race to the bottom; Government (linguistics); Economic union; Constitutional law; Economic integration; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Globalization","score_opus":0.02572590153593192,"score_gpt":0.248705989543933,"score_spread":0.22298008800800106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1546927699","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0377272,0.0082666855,0.009503909,0.23724934,0.001318611,0.00012762177,0.00018307667,0.00011354629,0.70551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92141014,0.00297114,0.0043513165,0.018867435,0.0006627411,0.00010427986,0.000101585894,0.000050468687,0.051480897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98154795,0.005250533,0.00034129462,0.0015821011,0.005458913,0.005819134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938653,0.0030077242,0.0005578242,0.00070922746,0.0011582646,0.0007017342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017160447,0.00046149784,0.00058571715,0.0023104653,0.018184027,0.019414818,0.0026415146,0.011449459,0.0071090795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025049819,0.00041767495,0.0006150347,0.0031706882,0.04181387,0.009466382,0.0065837405,0.010348292,0.00043610675],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036124513,0.000002709893,0.000053777367,0.0000041415065,6.1031545e-7,0.000016243395,0.00041879484,0.00013745163,0.000013983825,0.9954046,0.0024993112,0.001444734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007293162,0.000031031283,0.0020372716,0.00027629168,0.000023050066,0.000048542177,0.0031890075,0.0015603055,0.00034982717,0.706247,0.28608644,0.00007821541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75876826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7453506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24123174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07507966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13443479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5447436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1547336736","doi":"10.21991/c9w97s","title":"The PHS Case and Federalism-Based Alternatives to Charter Activism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Argument (complex analysis); Federalism; Law; Downtown; Political science; Federal court; Cooperative federalism; Public administration; Medicine","score_opus":0.018712863592667526,"score_gpt":0.29312943236201083,"score_spread":0.2744165687693433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1547336736","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043056313,0.0016288068,0.017284697,0.13289726,0.0013805856,0.00019681048,0.00016238143,0.00011677662,0.80327636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9076698,0.00048755948,0.004397868,0.048243776,0.0012408058,0.00033271444,0.00007461503,0.000046384965,0.03750658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97709787,0.008460584,0.0005752108,0.0034661824,0.0046802815,0.005719984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882409,0.0074622934,0.0008135177,0.0014094173,0.001302579,0.0007712462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021359695,0.0006148753,0.0008093563,0.001774997,0.017534092,0.013114895,0.0034728139,0.02664111,0.007595108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032340817,0.000760455,0.0015636613,0.0016534494,0.029190153,0.007875123,0.0055632307,0.021921605,0.00080385874],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060495418,0.000008002396,0.00006416999,0.0000044750836,0.0000022341058,0.000039153972,0.0003859313,0.00006995771,0.0000313198,0.9967891,0.002017069,0.00058256544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020569537,0.00006427362,0.0009308711,0.00021912053,0.00004732058,0.00012874186,0.0018312992,0.0019802395,0.00061340106,0.8449785,0.14891653,0.00008396317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09193367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12405616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09193367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02065964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020385364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18279713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1547460574","doi":"10.21991/c9x95b","title":"Advice to the Minister of Democratic Reform","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Prime minister; Democracy; Government (linguistics); General election; Political science; Public administration; Governor; Power (physics); Accountability; Legislation; Commons; Law; Politics; Parliament","score_opus":0.016448884517866233,"score_gpt":0.2741907631426561,"score_spread":0.25774187862478987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1547460574","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005668446,0.0045989505,0.00044902146,0.92753756,0.020801855,0.0000500735,0.00012336437,0.00008626344,0.04578604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018287402,0.00289322,0.0020864368,0.6213975,0.0058660395,0.00010762443,0.0001370316,0.00018840426,0.34903634],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929368,0.0025732166,0.0004291282,0.0007149505,0.0019051007,0.0014407852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992728,0.0020496084,0.00028145034,0.00038514414,0.002320974,0.002234977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008275244,0.00065289147,0.0008075986,0.0010862325,0.007646945,0.0060105626,0.0013517354,0.016266547,0.044188924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02727363,0.0005285728,0.0009905357,0.0009052809,0.0028512215,0.0058011734,0.0033418157,0.02129394,0.015434642],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027372564,0.000018703497,0.00017252544,0.00004074811,0.000003024637,0.000102732665,0.0005396114,0.00002360644,0.00009471517,0.030846309,0.96233445,0.0057960437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011937316,0.0000047711596,0.00015107353,0.000048011323,0.0000019527913,0.000037871545,0.00030308028,0.00002403245,0.00004204381,0.0022810425,0.99708706,0.0000070461547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030720303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.071199745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044188924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009692892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014482297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14782667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1547489040","doi":"10.21991/c95d45","title":"\"THE WEST\": MYTH OR REALITY IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM PROCESS?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Process (computing); Political science; Aesthetics; Art; Literature; Computer science","score_opus":0.06010716656925265,"score_gpt":0.32642428402698465,"score_spread":0.266317117457732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1547489040","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028622106,0.010474765,0.0147602735,0.7528767,0.00241897,0.00005889086,0.000075591546,0.0000520884,0.1906606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92356575,0.005015149,0.0042215213,0.049208798,0.0030962802,0.00019300761,0.000048588485,0.000117013806,0.014533903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97719485,0.016781446,0.0004901527,0.0013611682,0.0022494905,0.0019229116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9845083,0.010320878,0.0012269819,0.0012324785,0.0012767137,0.0014346607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025696827,0.00053851045,0.0013929178,0.0025900824,0.011961245,0.021593256,0.002457501,0.009657849,0.0060306685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0274529,0.0005645453,0.00058851397,0.002919898,0.10069561,0.032345526,0.007886397,0.0186406,0.0007044217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009147547,0.000017485117,0.00009853635,0.000023961351,0.0000034549405,0.000018004663,0.0068120407,0.000037495927,0.000035461722,0.98701525,0.003478837,0.0024503067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026710322,0.000019702471,0.00035560498,0.00022117139,0.000012030482,0.000035052246,0.012389743,0.0002636848,0.00017296961,0.931731,0.054752443,0.000019869956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063690515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006341857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025696827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00870577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017124945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13589942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1547737204","doi":"10.21991/c9td42","title":"Constitutional Law and the Alberta Energy Regulator","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Regulator; Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Tribunal; Law and economics; Sociology; Chemistry","score_opus":0.00806432428901928,"score_gpt":0.23600027991086098,"score_spread":0.22793595562184168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1547737204","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030718286,0.007642148,0.009212175,0.072656736,0.00072545797,0.000051815026,0.00006244628,0.00010255971,0.87882835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8685993,0.0035397108,0.0037801398,0.010243187,0.00033520197,0.00004928386,0.00006170496,0.000039198163,0.11335233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933478,0.0017888863,0.000106349515,0.00057268137,0.002454182,0.0017301234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99715793,0.0013731169,0.00014204484,0.0002058027,0.0007777045,0.00034347866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071781767,0.00027017682,0.00029968205,0.0012505047,0.013454762,0.012035083,0.0018731225,0.004831372,0.0045679607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069859694,0.00033037912,0.00039169192,0.001407575,0.032670557,0.003460811,0.0030266792,0.004946467,0.00033570567],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017341547,0.0000023452462,0.00014480027,0.000004353773,0.0000010849901,0.000029331171,0.00062240864,0.00018990936,0.000041318992,0.9954456,0.0019199939,0.001597113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001930614,0.000013686071,0.0022523731,0.00015815739,0.000015002494,0.000080913356,0.0036955655,0.0010369185,0.00031184067,0.5419693,0.4503978,0.000049267102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6923775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.75713414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3076225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042806707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.061368052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61886823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1548364816","doi":"10.21991/c9hd48","title":"Insite: Right Answer, Wrong Question","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Disaster Response and Management","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Epistemology; Law and economics; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.036998682425772915,"score_gpt":0.37309322742554396,"score_spread":0.33609454499977104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1548364816","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00084887986,0.00050182117,0.0009609584,0.9210899,0.033413675,0.000054384473,0.00025312425,0.0001608075,0.04271631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018547691,0.00027171944,0.0005172558,0.9266549,0.011875,0.0001506482,0.00011849201,0.00019002825,0.04167428],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895415,0.00317603,0.0006547933,0.0014267676,0.0032933115,0.0019076809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98479503,0.008204777,0.00078086404,0.0006240978,0.004646275,0.00094894797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009143812,0.0009747977,0.0008732,0.0005951472,0.010875519,0.0051814723,0.003417419,0.035416543,0.034334138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04639702,0.0007632632,0.0009872364,0.0004656687,0.007432445,0.0064628315,0.004798568,0.033404116,0.018461728],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024696139,0.000013377019,0.00014868261,0.000033113178,0.000003193372,0.00016079198,0.0010017798,0.000020849591,0.00011073774,0.01643359,0.98081654,0.0012325327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024215906,0.000019292063,0.0005020364,0.00016599386,0.000008993598,0.00023061837,0.004001278,0.00015941779,0.00039512687,0.010666987,0.98376924,0.000056885056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020960929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020300033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035416543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054828096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063509736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.114859164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W154916456","doi":"10.21991/c9fw9c","title":"CRISIS WHAT CRISIS? THE RECOGNITION ISSUE AND CANADIAN IDENTITY CRISES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Ceremony; Sovereignty; Identity (music); Identity crisis; Political science; Political economy; National identity; Sociology; History; Law; Aesthetics; Politics; Social science; Face (sociological concept); Art","score_opus":0.0418242826888563,"score_gpt":0.25739348300782444,"score_spread":0.21556920031896815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W154916456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11663226,0.014424308,0.00065365486,0.42363063,0.0017809065,0.000057345012,0.00037648488,0.000062516265,0.4423819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9226302,0.004354706,0.00029522696,0.022470674,0.0002457643,0.00002385959,0.00014954925,0.00005530063,0.049774677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99461186,0.00053736824,0.00006310944,0.00040618368,0.0011624412,0.003219088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99680823,0.0006260766,0.00020653023,0.000107821565,0.0009977121,0.0012536115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025569058,0.00043775444,0.00044967732,0.002032594,0.046955902,0.017433261,0.0022622936,0.006374398,0.014307397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076964595,0.00033310405,0.000295406,0.0041789548,0.022919122,0.006118189,0.0055834325,0.008105111,0.0004436454],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000632763,0.000028980445,0.0031387,0.00008030716,0.000008824479,0.00070903444,0.091835275,0.0002418996,0.00022669061,0.71956414,0.16036776,0.023735166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029900102,0.000016618298,0.013357943,0.00035956048,0.000016961327,0.00030966254,0.20790336,0.0004763443,0.00026735,0.037733562,0.73939073,0.00013791282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9944959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9957522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21889518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21889518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19329649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9059709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1550395734","doi":"10.21991/c97w9h","title":"RELUCTANT WARRIOR, ENTHUSIASTIC PEACEKEEPER: DOMESTIC LEGAL REGULATION OF CANADIAN PARTICIPATION IN ARMED CONFLICTS*","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Legitimacy; Law; Obligation; Charter; Ratification; Opposition (politics); Politics; Public administration","score_opus":0.03857652285007627,"score_gpt":0.2918968558749897,"score_spread":0.2533203330249134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1550395734","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3133006,0.0026651928,0.004031466,0.04231665,0.0002092722,0.00011626145,0.00019268617,0.000058444595,0.6371095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982701,0.00047294836,0.0006458722,0.0015187671,0.000015020831,0.000019652554,0.000029022385,0.000014050619,0.014583586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99558747,0.00092574727,0.000088672576,0.00043383194,0.0011835917,0.001780683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99489623,0.0015365323,0.0004663698,0.00025217613,0.0018954056,0.0009533925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003685292,0.0002744675,0.00021356721,0.0016275181,0.026519038,0.007613237,0.0019000329,0.0022101493,0.0058809626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00904736,0.00031232566,0.00022404181,0.00189846,0.018047137,0.0018276698,0.0046063196,0.0027002657,0.0002498928],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052505697,0.000045613215,0.011614167,0.00007651907,0.00001365139,0.00039126407,0.11171348,0.0005412542,0.00081597036,0.83514863,0.016660796,0.022926189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058317673,0.000058133148,0.08115396,0.0005065652,0.00008682805,0.00029464116,0.20411812,0.003033212,0.0018697846,0.06834575,0.6401983,0.00027639567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98899406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9941047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.116920836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.116920836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1371226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.848324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551668827","doi":"10.21991/c9kd4w","title":"The Notwithstanding Clause, the Charter, and Canada's Patriated Constitution: What I Thought We Were Doing","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"CARE Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Legislature; Constitution; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Establishment Clause; Bill of rights; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology; First amendment; Philosophy; Linguistics; Supreme court","score_opus":0.02493831321886555,"score_gpt":0.2755818411728401,"score_spread":0.2506435279539746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1551668827","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026421677,0.049741082,0.0070910933,0.71379,0.0035612127,0.000071845025,0.00025706863,0.000084200656,0.19898175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73160374,0.030451188,0.006993945,0.16064744,0.0016384784,0.00010235969,0.00020615067,0.00017416505,0.068182506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99339676,0.0012937856,0.00013124295,0.0007800807,0.0024059636,0.0019921456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99299824,0.0033566735,0.0003221136,0.00025423683,0.002185219,0.0008835855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008698131,0.00046161198,0.000703623,0.0023919449,0.020785935,0.02003801,0.0023745403,0.010263089,0.003223497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01400237,0.00048606168,0.0005395598,0.0035760982,0.06526093,0.011411656,0.0029017653,0.015371403,0.00030776332],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000958875,0.000005818861,0.00038645705,0.000057485933,0.0000045796587,0.00010866093,0.007906699,0.00015219937,0.00006236291,0.9618761,0.023201868,0.0062281583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023972196,0.0000143327825,0.0019599712,0.00073562807,0.000020240395,0.000111817484,0.0140609825,0.00054762623,0.0003826828,0.23211446,0.7499036,0.00012460812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95644534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95086336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09883508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09883508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11345421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71710205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1552038713","doi":"10.21991/c98d6v","title":"Status Quo Unacceptable; Senate Reform Possible; Abolition by Stealth Anti-Democratic","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Status quo; Democracy; Supreme court; Assertion; Political science; Government (linguistics); Deliberative democracy; Conversation; Public administration; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.02756846547895683,"score_gpt":0.3079304965949745,"score_spread":0.2803620311160177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1552038713","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018164262,0.0019655547,0.013469763,0.25721833,0.0020437639,0.000082661565,0.00008893776,0.00011952064,0.70684713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8598362,0.0013224209,0.004935354,0.055522207,0.0014230699,0.00025561886,0.000044366512,0.00015138145,0.07650933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97875607,0.013642241,0.00048337126,0.0019032713,0.0031650374,0.0020499898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99066263,0.004916561,0.00075584545,0.0012690108,0.0016774475,0.00071856624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016160619,0.0005148523,0.00047354796,0.000996676,0.01219958,0.012011446,0.0009983421,0.009406438,0.009288246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020636547,0.00031570438,0.00050168595,0.001021727,0.03175928,0.006689565,0.0056138337,0.014496179,0.0019563492],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008427599,0.000006660348,0.00010513457,0.0000134956,0.0000022629206,0.00003743844,0.00096440205,0.000051502164,0.00007621514,0.9839722,0.012858296,0.0019039783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024827395,0.000032798114,0.00060592935,0.0001534341,0.000013407395,0.00013249823,0.003440463,0.00051270594,0.0007282311,0.65061784,0.34370545,0.000032354328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008997288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012967097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9943112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056888056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008817528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08546656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1552243689","doi":"10.21991/c9037n","title":"Disputed Election Results: A More Rigorous \"Magic Number Test\"","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Democracy; Political science; General election; Government (linguistics); Law; Faith; Public administration; Politics; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014966732551563122,"score_gpt":0.2775262897633366,"score_spread":0.2625595572117735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1552243689","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17766225,0.009855783,0.19691478,0.19949464,0.013727034,0.00230692,0.0024602017,0.00038765892,0.39719075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87239623,0.0010137865,0.06332593,0.045144357,0.0059862,0.002137666,0.00061530323,0.00024774633,0.00913272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6620806,0.23694366,0.01353589,0.019680873,0.06310479,0.004654184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.20105806,0.73190594,0.016687725,0.027484225,0.020442082,0.0024219034],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.23887822,0.0014835374,0.003640844,0.008375225,0.0063501825,0.013420398,0.009317889,0.0126153175,0.024789242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6215555,0.0007580435,0.0036606516,0.005780123,0.036465943,0.039274402,0.012001757,0.018854482,0.0022526241],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051515934,0.0003251177,0.0075149355,0.00045605586,0.0002442084,0.0003402846,0.0016111963,0.000562112,0.00023047769,0.94576144,0.014845251,0.02759379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015846747,0.0017984884,0.009454799,0.0013891831,0.0006162916,0.00065323216,0.0030945898,0.010546203,0.0016293322,0.8857669,0.08320069,0.0002656154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002035715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017785735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23887822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004284093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006378902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93859863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1553316687","doi":"10.21991/c97s9g","title":"SMOKING GUNS: THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CONFRONTS THE TOBACCO AND GUN LOBBIES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Gun Ownership and Violence Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Political science; Environmental health; Gun control; Public administration; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.0624335028299581,"score_gpt":0.3012717482031064,"score_spread":0.23883824537314832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1553316687","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12258746,0.0039478317,0.000618745,0.76805717,0.0017687547,0.00002447779,0.00006834212,0.000020680513,0.102906555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89129657,0.0016394005,0.00020631605,0.092413865,0.0015753936,0.000050376835,0.00003727422,0.00002381881,0.012756886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9840789,0.005833616,0.00030276366,0.0009817985,0.0028133611,0.005989552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98238593,0.011182655,0.0016862461,0.0006227448,0.0012393242,0.0028831162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01781268,0.00033410336,0.000824697,0.0019631828,0.024548743,0.022531714,0.0026654976,0.037244797,0.010815458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027498495,0.0008043396,0.0009704003,0.0023921214,0.023587463,0.011128272,0.00914822,0.023140801,0.0006249618],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014818173,0.0003198495,0.011483673,0.000071409595,0.00006052494,0.00066813134,0.023014475,0.00032148193,0.0005548515,0.85960823,0.08019426,0.023555037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002243233,0.00023209082,0.051120188,0.0009208349,0.00022953852,0.0004955016,0.092084184,0.0013458751,0.0013717938,0.46620876,0.38552076,0.00024620112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08989682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1568969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08989682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015450404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029959608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17874712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1554680488","doi":"10.21991/c9zw91","title":"FEDERAL HOUSE COMMITTEE REFORM: MINDLESS ADVERSARIALISM WELL DONE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Housing Market and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"House of Representatives; Political science; Public administration; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04128013979092135,"score_gpt":0.20979684209302113,"score_spread":0.16851670230209978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1554680488","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022311855,0.0016981161,0.020961307,0.6437684,0.005738887,0.00015096684,0.00014258684,0.00021672153,0.30501112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6778207,0.0005242361,0.0037044648,0.24801292,0.0047139674,0.00023675674,0.00006604394,0.0002089928,0.064711995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96295244,0.013395316,0.0009567245,0.003924527,0.010158677,0.008612324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95742977,0.015484259,0.003650398,0.007563505,0.006993685,0.008878453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03312867,0.00061734533,0.00094814104,0.0013792884,0.012650844,0.012926647,0.00265591,0.019235834,0.01754101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07996831,0.0007590645,0.000839396,0.00093551906,0.022289574,0.013499445,0.008337075,0.023008285,0.0029265427],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037579302,0.00010826374,0.00070280296,0.000029546443,0.000039699604,0.000070911905,0.0012856539,0.00040392557,0.00022507919,0.8832086,0.10168183,0.01220612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000091139635,0.000043143296,0.002015341,0.00013536424,0.000038532256,0.00006162995,0.00097624824,0.0006994259,0.0005713305,0.8217653,0.17353149,0.00007112015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012882167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022387223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03312867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007920043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019561486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1752032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1555058664","doi":"10.21991/c9ph23","title":"L'AFFAIRE MAHE: LE JUDGEMENT DE LA DECENNIE EN DROITS LINGUISTIQUES","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Geography; Art","score_opus":0.024060295937690452,"score_gpt":0.2931480949243509,"score_spread":0.26908779898666046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1555058664","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.110138334,0.02241772,0.029265257,0.3090715,0.005537654,0.00010104286,0.00042318527,0.00014790839,0.5228974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94112337,0.0018415501,0.0042437348,0.00590654,0.0015089582,0.000093948925,0.00005523078,0.00013071162,0.045096003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9812121,0.011351671,0.0008227273,0.0010536505,0.0039448473,0.0016149541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9788614,0.015339276,0.0010492663,0.0007515636,0.0030800547,0.0009184717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015705515,0.0005056575,0.0008137116,0.0029038247,0.011277494,0.0136844255,0.0021896376,0.011871593,0.008795871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057511702,0.00059822015,0.00043702353,0.0022192092,0.017619025,0.01377361,0.006481894,0.01186021,0.0008433352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005667385,0.000007793111,0.0005136574,0.00006803158,0.0000087585895,0.00016021772,0.023815,0.00017191329,0.0002452548,0.95022345,0.01326119,0.01146808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042480544,0.00005840596,0.007931901,0.000743033,0.000039535396,0.0004984046,0.041431002,0.0011368372,0.0014348503,0.4357885,0.5106975,0.00019752642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046604604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051219746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95339537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009450782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006329279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.092666686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1556805264","doi":"10.21991/c9vd4c","title":"READING THE PREAMBLE TO THE BRITISH NORTH AMERICA ACT, 1867","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Sports and Literature","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Preamble; Reading (process); History; Telecommunications; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.019667952441810264,"score_gpt":0.20525444392846293,"score_spread":0.18558649148665265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1556805264","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005910746,0.032930147,0.00081719534,0.08222713,0.012812249,0.00016393984,0.0035355885,0.00010454206,0.8614985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07660643,0.011075827,0.0020002848,0.08365317,0.0025175682,0.00051852426,0.0016222778,0.00019591206,0.82180995],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99360365,0.00122217,0.0006047521,0.0006367943,0.0026664396,0.0012661421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949693,0.0014023307,0.0002088886,0.00025481338,0.0027649475,0.00039974044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038159348,0.00077595905,0.00084192527,0.0021784417,0.014631866,0.008240972,0.0015698577,0.012982735,0.0193377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014542098,0.0010159502,0.00053092587,0.0026934608,0.00626578,0.0037195787,0.002517004,0.013558636,0.007521576],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030467536,0.000040378865,0.0005181534,0.00014071021,0.000008615139,0.00014118753,0.0035280816,0.000104209146,0.00021801253,0.29830882,0.68779206,0.009169256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000115246885,0.000007517947,0.0027830459,0.0004555489,0.000009654395,0.000024920691,0.0009969898,0.000022802244,0.00012544966,0.009187,0.98634446,0.00003109195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71291906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8434085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28708094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025323749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047130004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57754326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1559582061","doi":"10.21991/c92m2j","title":"DISTINCT STATUS FOR QUÉBEC: A BENEFIT TO ENGLISH CANADA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Demography; Genealogy; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.018722872757179536,"score_gpt":0.2221988899486685,"score_spread":0.20347601719148894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1559582061","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054811936,0.004787438,0.0016410102,0.59100634,0.0055661504,0.0003067362,0.0025807533,0.0002794642,0.3390201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26573658,0.002206392,0.0043078614,0.1766911,0.00082689524,0.00028121486,0.0008440897,0.00019121563,0.5489147],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922643,0.000709609,0.0001795114,0.00041523873,0.002642516,0.0037887557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98251545,0.0017726494,0.00036473377,0.0006165437,0.0066352617,0.008095361],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051837857,0.0005057202,0.0008408565,0.0013119114,0.022329262,0.011231421,0.003113849,0.0135582015,0.030978065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012355543,0.0006609802,0.001058577,0.0015658314,0.004372984,0.0033484336,0.0060440893,0.011460588,0.0018581827],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000211322,0.00018548833,0.0061905384,0.00018392045,0.00006360092,0.0013780799,0.004785429,0.0006380684,0.0013850862,0.28458366,0.6668385,0.03355635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018176845,0.000047593956,0.01780306,0.00028457172,0.00006445004,0.00015089037,0.0048028785,0.0005346761,0.00041210258,0.009179324,0.9663784,0.00016022005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9895154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99621165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91839826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08160173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32539737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59206474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W15623030","doi":"10.21991/c9q074","title":"CANADA AND QUÉBEC IN A NEW WORLD: THE PQ'S ECONOMIC PROPOSALS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Cooperative Studies and Economics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.019899426003074278,"score_gpt":0.19314956593008567,"score_spread":0.17325013992701138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W15623030","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029390717,0.01657177,0.0014934415,0.6539299,0.006841384,0.00020959505,0.0011003853,0.000114488386,0.29034832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3542471,0.008576964,0.0042649196,0.23568012,0.0018257932,0.00041898034,0.00062343944,0.00017557066,0.39418715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98390424,0.0020964418,0.00040792543,0.0008499796,0.006141916,0.006599549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98953605,0.001855425,0.0002573953,0.00036129967,0.0045026024,0.00348716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009434369,0.0009926973,0.0013031958,0.002811506,0.03656751,0.027339911,0.0057379236,0.026007406,0.015475667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020037407,0.0012584308,0.0018065339,0.005067335,0.013723521,0.0065272194,0.0068698884,0.02105795,0.0007016356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009219073,0.00009903524,0.002063742,0.00009134183,0.000044435652,0.0004930444,0.002586077,0.0013033409,0.0001997227,0.675461,0.30333498,0.014231117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014896478,0.000027543258,0.0075544612,0.00026848103,0.000061895495,0.000106646694,0.006001741,0.001071896,0.00019728625,0.030576224,0.95376396,0.00022078287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9959346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8056409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19435914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4320448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9344292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1564536184","doi":"10.21991/c9bh4r","title":"R. V. CHAULK AND R. V. SWAIN: INSANITY AND THE CONSTITUTION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Philosophy, History, and Historiography","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Insanity; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.03605406368811123,"score_gpt":0.19410658291241886,"score_spread":0.15805251922430763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1564536184","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01179655,0.29476818,0.003444657,0.4022077,0.0039712903,0.00006671429,0.00029571977,0.00009410673,0.28335512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50743264,0.19153559,0.0052141333,0.08850348,0.00803267,0.00022568488,0.00022762595,0.00018470366,0.19864357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984182,0.0006168031,0.00007710307,0.00017461959,0.00048220178,0.00023110029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99640036,0.0025848956,0.0002356776,0.00013456425,0.00042789825,0.00021663426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020533907,0.00059962866,0.0005626434,0.0017282268,0.004729444,0.0071167806,0.0018438094,0.016583042,0.0102690235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006350815,0.00056610926,0.0005489515,0.0029062445,0.006038494,0.005669104,0.002443697,0.0068271034,0.0015693889],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003645124,0.000031414664,0.0003255641,0.0001499236,0.000014795432,0.00025122016,0.0034092448,0.0002738248,0.00018564364,0.7620371,0.21940859,0.013876341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007229355,0.00004022641,0.005622742,0.0011343189,0.00004200117,0.00036185645,0.0050769593,0.0006158786,0.0008450509,0.37402865,0.6120462,0.00011389816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05315244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.110175714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05315244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004592398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058750445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10568613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1565630064","doi":"10.21991/c93667","title":"Fédéralisme Canadien et Lutte Contre Les Changements Climatiques","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Gouvernement du Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04255102805523591,"score_gpt":0.25895625336340217,"score_spread":0.21640522530816625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1565630064","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061094657,0.018308088,0.0043906323,0.09000911,0.0006443574,0.00005357305,0.00032384478,0.00017700018,0.8249987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8732762,0.0056970115,0.0012383026,0.002543257,0.00012402548,0.00002568737,0.000101313184,0.000038736605,0.11695561],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743843,0.00052953063,0.000043141423,0.00027188504,0.00064573094,0.0010712218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988261,0.0002581442,0.0001146742,0.00013776345,0.00038066396,0.00028269814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019512447,0.00034534588,0.00039777733,0.0017366831,0.013159795,0.0066501442,0.0007883801,0.0015836648,0.010825003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003238996,0.0002073676,0.00033843244,0.0028184487,0.018963527,0.0020798866,0.002698888,0.002868765,0.00053616136],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008750873,0.0000037163943,0.00074783043,0.000032096847,0.0000052746514,0.000034383047,0.0037995426,0.00024335225,0.000118544885,0.9823277,0.0056043793,0.0070743538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018989933,0.000019553932,0.018334156,0.0002867702,0.000025443567,0.00006510044,0.008760123,0.00050799176,0.00034985025,0.13772912,0.8338395,0.00006330848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90550995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9461991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09449005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07467793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.085855156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5418289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1569009351","doi":"10.21991/c9kt0h","title":"BEGGING AND FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Begging; Freedom of expression; Expression (computer science); Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.04049443135893493,"score_gpt":0.3005001846600774,"score_spread":0.26000575330114245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1569009351","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052866247,0.0044111656,0.06244215,0.025930915,0.0011504799,0.00012393146,0.00004545686,0.00014492884,0.8528847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9556848,0.00071393704,0.006486544,0.0020791092,0.0005039393,0.00020186801,0.000026382428,0.000075389624,0.03422812],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9849429,0.009461196,0.0004797875,0.0014681169,0.0018280856,0.0018198979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870554,0.009615185,0.0005680991,0.0017073851,0.0004700667,0.0005838415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012559411,0.00062458933,0.0012097711,0.001918832,0.010742138,0.014392837,0.0019312872,0.0073862807,0.009537064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020264277,0.0005860919,0.0008280649,0.0016382734,0.07656345,0.014310734,0.009308728,0.010630637,0.0007326087],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008759051,0.000013309865,0.000028706896,0.000007829258,0.0000014696199,0.000021637712,0.0035863607,0.000047601676,0.00006316598,0.99252737,0.00049611734,0.003197786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017705943,0.0000111032305,0.00010402907,0.000037320508,0.000004975161,0.000068843474,0.0023805613,0.00013689148,0.0001554424,0.98299843,0.014072357,0.000012331529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001172111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011639682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014392837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030492118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003501518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06642133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W15701400","doi":"10.21991/c9467x","title":"WAGING WAR: JAPAN’S CONSTITUTIONAL CONSTRAINTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Justiciability; Cabinet (room); Supreme court; Constitution; Legislation; Political science; Context (archaeology); Politics; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.03950356349238269,"score_gpt":0.2793096196738773,"score_spread":0.23980605618149461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W15701400","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22274512,0.0066046175,0.00348704,0.060383502,0.00075435045,0.00009477835,0.0006743684,0.00006896219,0.7051873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9539493,0.0020607568,0.0017875138,0.012277157,0.0005817857,0.00016735846,0.00019889553,0.00004942193,0.028927736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99693596,0.0006082313,0.00022735543,0.00043987203,0.0005870867,0.0012015247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970714,0.0010965012,0.00039903732,0.00030164496,0.0005206682,0.0006107437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004667178,0.00039924544,0.000417545,0.00133014,0.0076829023,0.008976724,0.0011825756,0.0037798295,0.008299687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006855965,0.00055748486,0.0003756799,0.0014725961,0.0074084224,0.0049014734,0.004537531,0.0063318135,0.0004886982],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044506927,0.00003159055,0.0019563206,0.00009087971,0.000020166766,0.00041831523,0.0073171696,0.0004672353,0.0011133398,0.9586481,0.01699484,0.012897644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015899772,0.000084219784,0.03335942,0.00063411944,0.00016991411,0.00027838332,0.012358511,0.0011991177,0.0013598744,0.26570237,0.68449783,0.00019726671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.086860135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15361568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.086860135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008217742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011184975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17270905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1571080196","doi":"10.21991/c91d4x","title":"Section 7, Insite and the Comptence of Courts","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Society of Canada; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Downtown; Section (typography); Business; Economic Justice; Drug trafficking; Law; Political science; Criminology; Medicine; Advertising; Psychology","score_opus":0.03221052678567575,"score_gpt":0.30163856524381916,"score_spread":0.2694280384581434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1571080196","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019513987,0.0023437147,0.004081145,0.0997168,0.0019696166,0.000080500984,0.00025549292,0.00010327831,0.8719355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53646034,0.0016757294,0.0033802292,0.22810318,0.00254214,0.000423887,0.0002846084,0.0001486243,0.22698133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895928,0.0025467102,0.00039806828,0.00091205846,0.003885305,0.0026650585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930356,0.0041092443,0.00034886075,0.0005353926,0.0014105422,0.0005603349],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00814796,0.00043448556,0.0005414495,0.00067796494,0.009406584,0.011009733,0.0020361168,0.020812476,0.0078485785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017107401,0.000665394,0.00085143704,0.00045794886,0.0123510165,0.0044118618,0.0036677683,0.015156743,0.0022530486],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015758662,0.000020427597,0.0005867692,0.000019400683,0.00000650634,0.0001892599,0.0012332208,0.000072996125,0.00017983565,0.95010626,0.04550853,0.002061061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009202402,0.00009448055,0.0023052644,0.00054071774,0.00005020873,0.00048737982,0.0033794667,0.00052603026,0.0017869853,0.3265911,0.66405237,0.00009394575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027591012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050881278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.972409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042024613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011502038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05486083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1572393345","doi":"10.21991/c93968","title":"The IOC Made Me Do it: Women’s Ski Jumping, VANOC, and the 2010 Winter Olympics","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Doping in Sports","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Political science; State (computer science); Novelty; Power (physics); Action (physics); Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.024721835276420464,"score_gpt":0.26711107987009436,"score_spread":0.2423892445936739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1572393345","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25968048,0.010408415,0.00014545563,0.6000138,0.0069761765,0.00010756612,0.0024452254,0.000035817655,0.12018702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80230606,0.0050897626,0.00022846546,0.11548527,0.0034389482,0.00038110343,0.0012515289,0.000063908694,0.07175495],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970285,0.0005540901,0.000115706505,0.00016438923,0.00045068967,0.0016865554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99629754,0.00080064253,0.00055140426,0.00008422935,0.00035632838,0.0019098367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032575144,0.00031801045,0.0003921485,0.0013221237,0.008901202,0.007663949,0.0013102632,0.008733785,0.008211009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072035585,0.00041619406,0.00055342686,0.0019281298,0.0034031237,0.0020678057,0.004629626,0.0075026304,0.0006659298],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006527596,0.00090410194,0.1337914,0.0004969972,0.00017171563,0.00081795844,0.054830216,0.0005256017,0.001969354,0.15284014,0.5900762,0.06292358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018357515,0.0001939579,0.3940714,0.0010357802,0.00009494697,0.00008285071,0.075489536,0.00016667019,0.0004937629,0.007053919,0.520986,0.00014755054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4844662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7763273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4844662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011362314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026298223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9632926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W157640386","doi":"10.21991/c9j94j","title":"THE DEMISE OF POSITIVE LIBERTY? NATIVE WOMEN'S ASSOCIATION OF CANADA V. CANADA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Demise; Association (psychology); Political science; Demography; Genealogy; Law; History; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.009529665562589657,"score_gpt":0.21930988474541108,"score_spread":0.20978021918282141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W157640386","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059450697,0.010221514,0.0005635725,0.458435,0.0016376843,0.00008687027,0.0005755862,0.000062818195,0.46896628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66245717,0.0059873555,0.000502726,0.18698786,0.00033425848,0.00008813933,0.000133173,0.000049862872,0.14345948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99191064,0.0006789217,0.00010349294,0.00033958195,0.0024300779,0.004537368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954249,0.0008610195,0.00018548309,0.000119557415,0.0017067202,0.001702281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003534848,0.0003294538,0.0005020849,0.0008736823,0.028087905,0.008133397,0.0018628732,0.008229385,0.0061479374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008254249,0.00046797685,0.0005407945,0.0013297019,0.009291173,0.0024071317,0.0029096138,0.010062909,0.0004438294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009531627,0.000031424835,0.006502522,0.000114510054,0.000040155697,0.0010091772,0.0130690895,0.00045369056,0.00056748005,0.5987435,0.35876417,0.02060896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013956678,0.000054216518,0.025717627,0.0006488456,0.00013188021,0.00038103526,0.034393962,0.0006067068,0.0011126571,0.040173978,0.8963414,0.00029822672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9945305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99802387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09225628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09225628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24477592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6693693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579037692","doi":"10.21991/c9vd5r","title":"Religious Accommodation and its Limits: The Recent Controversy at York University","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; Charter; Religious belief; Religious freedom; Religious identity; Political science; Set (abstract data type); Law; Sociology; Religious discrimination; Human rights; Freedom of religion; Reasonable accommodation; Law and economics; Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Religiosity","score_opus":0.01985733982715497,"score_gpt":0.25303124401880495,"score_spread":0.23317390419164996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579037692","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024270158,0.040024605,0.0005263297,0.83189523,0.0029983872,0.000012843341,0.0000747662,0.00002282109,0.100174844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61330557,0.028451027,0.0005801387,0.28668892,0.009869386,0.00012278251,0.000119583405,0.00009933601,0.0607633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931979,0.0021530525,0.00036566425,0.000900048,0.0016727956,0.0017105943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98073155,0.013371844,0.0008978214,0.0007174387,0.0015160262,0.0027654015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010358928,0.0002472411,0.0008190743,0.0011942908,0.019389497,0.013086166,0.0025664784,0.022684688,0.01736716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022925274,0.0007357257,0.00043483838,0.0015840598,0.034856927,0.014098336,0.008254334,0.027984396,0.00093568757],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063381194,0.00003772916,0.0009623409,0.00014483726,0.000006960959,0.0003509921,0.010891416,0.000085467036,0.00021100025,0.8446086,0.12485808,0.017779117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007406433,0.00003098986,0.0043030987,0.0012884199,0.000018345867,0.00022414772,0.020126197,0.00021068421,0.00029674254,0.11618747,0.85712117,0.00011872175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.251018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35150972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.748982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023353076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017772647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4991138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579225466","doi":"10.21991/c95h2f","title":"THE CONSTITUTIONAL DEBATE IN ISRAEL","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Philosophy; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.04611981975433223,"score_gpt":0.2776323539102004,"score_spread":0.2315125341558682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579225466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2333034,0.013856194,0.00078933366,0.063127846,0.00042013128,0.000028872128,0.00007221079,0.000016399948,0.6883855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9723263,0.0011630458,0.00016047282,0.00477448,0.00027553953,0.000027021179,0.000025098176,0.000010687568,0.021237383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966634,0.0017779417,0.00005469911,0.00016246055,0.00038337856,0.0009581348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815804,0.0012135087,0.00013149799,0.000063448526,0.00020164766,0.00023179683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061262813,0.00025862877,0.0004993182,0.001626326,0.011761798,0.011321656,0.00095265906,0.0047326144,0.0064721154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004536407,0.00020227286,0.00026583334,0.001762321,0.020047221,0.0037225045,0.003039963,0.004323639,0.0005211165],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041290452,0.000049752154,0.00080781523,0.000022703329,0.0000068384775,0.00011665488,0.0069404216,0.00018478962,0.00015186078,0.9784667,0.005097806,0.00811337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017506587,0.00006638575,0.008012823,0.00042562454,0.000023657862,0.00016638824,0.026523804,0.00083074445,0.0007844576,0.6433096,0.31963328,0.00004819884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02535154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02242668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02535154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016477661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008691962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11955434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579513605","doi":"10.21991/c9sx0d","title":"The Politics of Hate Speech: A Case Comment on Warman v Lemire","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Law; Supreme court; Human rights; Statute; Charter; Political science; Politics; Constitutional right; Legitimacy; Sociology","score_opus":0.040232405356439634,"score_gpt":0.3080979706965263,"score_spread":0.26786556534008665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579513605","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05915181,0.008999671,0.0011046046,0.73209774,0.0027013768,0.00014606117,0.00011390887,0.000059586466,0.1956252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27703613,0.002733484,0.0005836475,0.6447231,0.001679775,0.00013220836,0.000050746487,0.00007454941,0.07298632],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870157,0.004130412,0.00027156793,0.0014865497,0.0031353293,0.0039604595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99094594,0.00680303,0.0003114893,0.00023166428,0.00088824454,0.0008196013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0105346665,0.00066394056,0.0007400823,0.0012822963,0.056115877,0.008325525,0.0052027423,0.038761497,0.006362145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018379442,0.00095896714,0.0011371386,0.0014016825,0.019111218,0.005897909,0.006711628,0.045191,0.0010106618],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087496606,0.00010986326,0.002214513,0.0001587773,0.00003592056,0.010960464,0.09221812,0.00030676188,0.0016855098,0.51041687,0.36903965,0.012766089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045407192,0.000078177334,0.0058495835,0.00092666975,0.0000641268,0.002503258,0.08038112,0.0006171942,0.0017418321,0.032219585,0.8752417,0.00033144205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6051548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7543746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3948452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033927597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036026187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.794341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W158278092","doi":"10.21991/c9wt1p","title":"Equalization, Regional Development, and Political Trust: The Section 36/Atlantic Accords Controversy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Grievance; Federalism; Politics; Political science; Nova scotia; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Ethnology","score_opus":0.044957191710041436,"score_gpt":0.2816776993911991,"score_spread":0.23672050768115765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W158278092","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30091003,0.0066741137,0.0022122,0.14103012,0.0003230804,0.00002919739,0.0000808114,0.00004898333,0.5486915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99361587,0.0004618108,0.00010834699,0.001298566,0.000040028717,0.0000028596417,0.0000054167917,0.0000047579974,0.0044623953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954234,0.00085126865,0.000074123425,0.00024656914,0.0011288485,0.0022758069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973539,0.0010451156,0.00025074856,0.00015116818,0.00057334546,0.00062576967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034245767,0.0001490852,0.00035529275,0.0013143265,0.018400686,0.010676293,0.0011268165,0.0030269125,0.003105673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008133744,0.0001692138,0.00023586916,0.0021510515,0.030705258,0.002401316,0.0030359179,0.0036833982,0.000115697156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016615204,0.00000805607,0.002257805,0.000014521893,0.0000040658406,0.00016565893,0.012440191,0.0003312798,0.00007078604,0.97060996,0.0065943645,0.0074867206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084921725,0.000040887186,0.04686119,0.00040065093,0.0000987634,0.00035000592,0.093442306,0.0030443717,0.000934122,0.4233775,0.4312178,0.00014748276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94977605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96238226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09571642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09571642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.061245516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69447446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583221229","doi":"10.21991/c92q0t","title":"EDMONTON JOURNAL V. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ALBERTA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"History and advancements in chemistry","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.02522388949952341,"score_gpt":0.23984598240778437,"score_spread":0.21462209290826095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1583221229","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013480888,0.008696482,0.00040525285,0.05206094,0.0023990686,0.00015291144,0.0005461496,0.00023062727,0.9220277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.060753852,0.0025939527,0.0003768002,0.032757122,0.00022902523,0.000053380914,0.00018989196,0.000051607818,0.90299433],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99549073,0.00018317976,0.000072913506,0.00033546673,0.0020898322,0.001827996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99737453,0.000665556,0.000071106944,0.000084134364,0.0012168225,0.0005879415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023234908,0.0006725701,0.0005007345,0.0014152493,0.017843254,0.006372459,0.001779567,0.00788645,0.03902055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004107988,0.0011114648,0.0005033958,0.001796728,0.0021474825,0.0012682183,0.0016009392,0.0068350947,0.004379612],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014420674,0.000073475894,0.0038234862,0.00010662932,0.000024685574,0.0010767481,0.0009091065,0.00035332274,0.0012599648,0.115413986,0.8509872,0.025827123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006449384,0.00003247996,0.007023263,0.00015269789,0.00004565297,0.00012749714,0.0011373672,0.00028305233,0.00063814875,0.0033804846,0.98703873,0.00007612658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9312614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9803862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96946526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03053475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.091480255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22154617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1584023780","doi":"10.21991/c9kq0g","title":"STRIKING THE BALANCE: NATIONAL SECURITY V. THE CHARTER","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Balance (ability); National security; Political science; Public administration; Law; Medicine; Physical medicine and rehabilitation","score_opus":0.041807248201543135,"score_gpt":0.2858542760187468,"score_spread":0.24404702781720367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1584023780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020317553,0.0040237787,0.003993671,0.47861838,0.0046013296,0.00009072625,0.0002793096,0.00006807173,0.48800722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4969074,0.0024623834,0.0034390138,0.38940603,0.0029993437,0.00037467707,0.00024697327,0.000113722504,0.10405053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98973864,0.0038601996,0.00037312336,0.0011402857,0.0028135919,0.0020742326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962004,0.0019778959,0.00032029767,0.00024078233,0.00076176506,0.0004988374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013029494,0.0004232361,0.0006016235,0.001041569,0.009609879,0.011453875,0.0015792083,0.020013984,0.005277435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025274817,0.00038881134,0.00066452933,0.0011276165,0.008846268,0.010130402,0.004119271,0.017248435,0.0011807054],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039056697,0.000018521036,0.00038398828,0.000022254977,0.000006627576,0.00009303201,0.001270832,0.00015077103,0.00019524082,0.8932685,0.099280775,0.005270276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015144018,0.00006654227,0.0020253756,0.0003734554,0.00004505989,0.0001398744,0.0032428151,0.0008252972,0.0011131811,0.47672296,0.51515406,0.00014000105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055496115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.077708684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055496115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009573704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023072185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1103462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1584055460","doi":"10.21991/c9bt1q","title":"Semi- Presidentialism à la française: the Recent Constitutional Evolution of the “Two-Headed” Executive","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"European Political History Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Political science; Executive branch; Executive power; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.028453373158206084,"score_gpt":0.2293207254871899,"score_spread":0.2008673523289838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1584055460","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7474608,0.007975092,0.0015278036,0.028340345,0.00038413116,0.000044291108,0.0009131511,0.000045852077,0.21330856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863892,0.000415115,0.00025136708,0.001212421,0.00008238712,0.000013363055,0.00014205993,0.000006647438,0.011487366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99619615,0.0009444454,0.00014799854,0.0004424515,0.00072405854,0.001544955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99503833,0.0014880042,0.0008231486,0.00033590096,0.0012704873,0.0010440116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004774749,0.00023326147,0.0002818631,0.0014885269,0.0045609735,0.0068622115,0.0007743152,0.0017166294,0.0041261427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077795126,0.00024677764,0.00034708678,0.0020230485,0.003133355,0.0019681698,0.0012454523,0.0030782016,0.00018406761],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025247128,0.00007146813,0.017360399,0.00010506678,0.00007173957,0.0003608419,0.008260077,0.0009395675,0.0013937895,0.92258227,0.011044747,0.037557494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014576889,0.00021218394,0.4766508,0.0002505733,0.00007144158,0.00037240842,0.006879984,0.001493082,0.001739267,0.040907767,0.47112328,0.00015343189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3093002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43997407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3093002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017093223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009515787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6149998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1584692578","doi":"10.21991/c9wm20","title":"Lost in Translation: Social Realities, Insite, and the Law in Legal Education","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Translation (biology); Legal education; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04068595896223407,"score_gpt":0.34353909076111633,"score_spread":0.30285313179888224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1584692578","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015567165,0.020050948,0.0022165154,0.76756895,0.011961988,0.000028998104,0.00014285461,0.0000681066,0.18239452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79112685,0.020083006,0.0021257198,0.09829625,0.012825105,0.00014991357,0.00022702124,0.00032181162,0.074844465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99030006,0.006697165,0.0004171605,0.00070212164,0.0012163827,0.00066701934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9644641,0.026439397,0.0011626484,0.0019423647,0.0040948493,0.0018966164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010055202,0.00067188236,0.00081029814,0.0031948981,0.01089546,0.025271032,0.0015086756,0.0070907897,0.03020163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04219499,0.0003844522,0.00046725117,0.0042739366,0.041255087,0.020915424,0.007252969,0.0118456,0.0028003675],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003330144,0.00007959079,0.0010314903,0.0003053452,0.000010419828,0.00015430697,0.08957403,0.00006800831,0.00006521685,0.79740787,0.069363885,0.041906632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003370929,0.00002885476,0.0027164186,0.0028017436,0.000021128357,0.00017311238,0.17359845,0.00034243517,0.00031215462,0.42689013,0.39304033,0.00004156175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019286383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024397092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03020163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010500673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018765895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10103458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W158484458","doi":"10.21991/c9xq0k","title":"UPDATE IN ISRAEL","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.04733209160994819,"score_gpt":0.27894129334374196,"score_spread":0.23160920173379376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W158484458","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022531508,0.37490168,0.0011583277,0.1998094,0.2552423,0.00017830732,0.006589144,0.0006214001,0.15924627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025763828,0.2976349,0.002974655,0.11930459,0.18351388,0.00041716688,0.012000453,0.0005219218,0.35786855],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984047,0.00034862116,0.0002412279,0.00012513771,0.0006268168,0.00025342577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901945,0.0016060879,0.0006098886,0.0003774458,0.0061939876,0.0010181216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042662364,0.000785481,0.0012574471,0.006592432,0.0009615101,0.004267918,0.0017432417,0.0038668683,0.05745059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012872519,0.0003265637,0.00075208966,0.0039738305,0.00072302413,0.0031655307,0.0020813073,0.0029767489,0.014679275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040187217,0.000024464673,0.00038257145,0.0005056413,0.0000132052055,0.0000671994,0.000040183193,0.000034644472,0.00005163114,0.00048875593,0.9116191,0.08673241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001695366,0.000010811215,0.0006144735,0.0008778051,0.000015667076,0.00007315301,0.00004903805,0.000012324138,0.00004970276,0.0001487188,0.9981274,0.000004034801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010226666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01903309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05745059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032370123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042056553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19219136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1586099888","doi":"10.21991/c99362","title":"THE DELEGATION POWER PAST AND PRESENT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Scientific Innovation and Industrial Efficiency","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Delegation; Power (physics); Political science; Computer science; Law; Physics","score_opus":0.130898655552262,"score_gpt":0.332228364253527,"score_spread":0.201329708701265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1586099888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055076145,0.0028720954,0.032950617,0.060703807,0.001949741,0.00004340189,0.00012012046,0.00006463546,0.84621936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96065825,0.00053058524,0.0023054495,0.0029029052,0.0012966411,0.000061121515,0.000027407435,0.000057877634,0.032159768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876258,0.004439901,0.00053704006,0.0023260743,0.0033786267,0.0016926877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9840158,0.008629116,0.0012784564,0.0024798324,0.0018054108,0.0017913576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013420753,0.00031648128,0.00067058794,0.0016084312,0.0073913904,0.011708432,0.0013497022,0.0064867847,0.009542664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03116467,0.00061577046,0.00043915396,0.0013089329,0.022838993,0.02233051,0.0040687136,0.010120256,0.00094672205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010310984,0.000008492251,0.000093661656,0.000007833097,0.0000028078607,0.000016304151,0.00088527426,0.00005779464,0.000073270625,0.99402606,0.0010653206,0.003752742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002332642,0.000026252173,0.0008283554,0.00005863797,0.000013714019,0.00008569423,0.0010151372,0.00041286112,0.0004168865,0.9310401,0.06604412,0.000034857243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023562047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025310186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013420753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060316613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004674507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.070976555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1586771993","doi":"10.21991/c9cq10","title":"TERMINAL CARE, TERMINAL JUSTICE: THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA AND SUE RODRIGUEZ","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Terminal (telecommunication); Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Remand (court procedure); Engineering; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.02368763410841072,"score_gpt":0.2618966319644512,"score_spread":0.23820899785604047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1586771993","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06006272,0.02800173,0.0007561131,0.7508124,0.0039356505,0.00019308188,0.00070229074,0.000049386763,0.15548657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5548849,0.013956922,0.0013750398,0.33656415,0.003018058,0.000268426,0.0003015868,0.00013933622,0.08949161],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9832945,0.0019334203,0.00045430614,0.0014342497,0.0043479293,0.008535533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977007,0.009107886,0.00074566266,0.00040785404,0.0061885943,0.0065431725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014280249,0.0008548728,0.0023025747,0.0021362323,0.066996455,0.02486416,0.0077367313,0.055144414,0.008383125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0415668,0.001556056,0.0017441325,0.004359947,0.019191897,0.0057088137,0.0059208637,0.04703153,0.00057876983],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017038194,0.00014341893,0.0048325043,0.00010043824,0.00012121071,0.0013769721,0.008215857,0.0012528945,0.00027118274,0.6614745,0.31206784,0.009972856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006256055,0.00010843044,0.03179196,0.0022372133,0.00068815466,0.00050806976,0.04238287,0.004715366,0.00084469636,0.19985501,0.71511817,0.0011244036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9867199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99526817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8438502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1561498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3601785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9787466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1587480210","doi":"10.21991/c9g96p","title":"A REVIEW OF THE TAYLOR CASE: USING HUMAN RIGHTS LEGISLATION TO CURB RACIST SPEECH","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Human rights; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.06233473018195917,"score_gpt":0.3263775389393905,"score_spread":0.2640428087574313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1587480210","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001452301,0.99201304,0.000119478274,0.002818838,0.00039491622,0.000013247122,0.00002460723,0.0000032216246,0.004467348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0024600197,0.99329835,0.00027098155,0.0025606565,0.00038130282,0.000023500763,0.00003153588,0.0000051144625,0.0009686788],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99456596,0.0018925985,0.0006863891,0.00060870295,0.001989676,0.00025663755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98120284,0.01359727,0.001455475,0.00030485843,0.0031772885,0.00026228308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007924431,0.0009698494,0.0021678652,0.0071328543,0.001332744,0.0028732247,0.0017759554,0.0060681077,0.004593785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020834688,0.0008408653,0.0010526286,0.0056038606,0.0029928163,0.0036072293,0.0014536157,0.0038935149,0.00174899],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007167638,0.00012708742,0.0004640789,0.040657837,0.00015604285,0.00039703347,0.0008130082,0.00027988164,0.0004995334,0.034163725,0.18357246,0.73879755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015325237,0.00005907867,0.0015078437,0.032358594,0.00013717276,0.00044693085,0.0004039787,0.000044600198,0.00027153135,0.0025642095,0.96216446,0.000026207304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017560923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029182736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017560923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004739634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011141886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04190892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1588628367","doi":"10.21991/c9ct0n","title":"The Turmoil Surrounding the Prorogation of Canada’s 40th Parliament & the Crown","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Politics; Enthusiasm; Population; Monarchy; Constitutional monarchy; Political science; Law; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Psychology; Demography","score_opus":0.03964466136308287,"score_gpt":0.26515102391650464,"score_spread":0.22550636255342177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1588628367","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03128286,0.015574513,0.001574965,0.49258423,0.010135066,0.000048324146,0.00049607904,0.0001464808,0.4481574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40403092,0.0071100765,0.00093007216,0.089383125,0.0011998346,0.00002675785,0.00015214042,0.00017746515,0.4969896],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955363,0.0004168093,0.000056265442,0.00040713485,0.0021530339,0.0014304782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970086,0.0005865265,0.00013668253,0.00009013098,0.0012353202,0.00094275974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019669067,0.00026152123,0.00026596492,0.00070361834,0.029099114,0.012170267,0.0010277898,0.004835739,0.008986482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00611299,0.00042687086,0.0002454605,0.0013251128,0.015278608,0.002381887,0.0019794567,0.009881646,0.0010227009],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040438237,0.000011505326,0.0014712325,0.00007320924,0.0000125446,0.00036928995,0.02005128,0.00015990797,0.0005094646,0.32900867,0.62417436,0.024118077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003134058,0.000004400509,0.00246384,0.000063660416,0.000003368047,0.00005288204,0.005478404,0.000056692497,0.00021617115,0.0029794343,0.9886567,0.000021470429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97277063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.991931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09984689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09984689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11048189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7244433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W159045234","doi":"10.21991/c9r07f","title":"NAFTA: RECENT CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS, SOVEREIGNTY TODAY, AND THE FUTURE OF FEDERALISM IN MEXICO","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Relations in Latin America","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Sovereignty; Political science; Dual federalism; New Federalism; Political economy; Law and economics; International trade; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.02419977619283936,"score_gpt":0.2858513406560834,"score_spread":0.26165156446324406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W159045234","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29203972,0.1059999,0.0011906172,0.40614128,0.002869405,0.00007448582,0.003042587,0.00008134371,0.18856065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9311049,0.027221704,0.0012239671,0.007636941,0.0033784425,0.00016124788,0.0011079832,0.0000328308,0.028132064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992042,0.00022809427,0.000045096236,0.0001150814,0.00018265178,0.00022488352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997421,0.0011594994,0.00069501135,0.000094661125,0.0004366563,0.00019327561],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036876202,0.00019779947,0.0003856088,0.0025923648,0.00516904,0.008286729,0.000860193,0.0038994781,0.005189991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006914039,0.00027173173,0.00046121128,0.0034755806,0.0028988628,0.0058075683,0.0018425207,0.005443141,0.00018188592],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025738523,0.00010921985,0.02038684,0.0003885519,0.00006921889,0.00044729517,0.009052749,0.0007398757,0.00046340394,0.85175794,0.076998375,0.03932914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015873092,0.000104458086,0.16787194,0.0013617342,0.00019090153,0.00018339993,0.009396119,0.0010690311,0.0006333737,0.05322784,0.765704,0.000098473145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18003291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23192488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18003291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012980262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00755418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1593030345","doi":"10.21991/c9qm2f","title":"Royal Succession and the Canadian Crown as a Corporation Sole: A Critique of Canada's Succession to the Throne Act, 2013","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Parks Canada; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Ecological succession; Statutory law; Law; Corporate law; Constitution; Throne; Crown (dentistry); Management; Political science; Economics; Politics; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.01039906631768936,"score_gpt":0.26718739993042645,"score_spread":0.2567883336127371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1593030345","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03550563,0.011345082,0.002456167,0.20139973,0.0012178648,0.00010129075,0.00038411113,0.0000752912,0.7475148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81343937,0.004040442,0.0016471008,0.043181084,0.0005632603,0.0000849941,0.00009572525,0.00009230193,0.13685574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910595,0.0010508952,0.0001739919,0.0008553586,0.003324271,0.003535853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956151,0.001170883,0.00017601701,0.00022646252,0.0019152357,0.00089631154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052813515,0.00052643946,0.0005879435,0.0019402651,0.040038742,0.016369553,0.003315806,0.011611713,0.0070699085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011520535,0.0006479748,0.000666353,0.0029290456,0.033233974,0.0034144043,0.0032362507,0.012318713,0.0004779035],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008162993,0.0000065874838,0.0002035277,0.000017643955,0.0000037278146,0.00007512972,0.0026870938,0.00016944346,0.00004503085,0.9690344,0.025074521,0.0026746963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008828088,0.00002159135,0.00494636,0.00043940565,0.00004574408,0.00010632309,0.010640444,0.0011738118,0.0004130762,0.20269504,0.77927834,0.0001515393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99181914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99463826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15513356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15513356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28100622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97992533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1594513305","doi":"10.21991/c96665","title":"THE CANADIAN CHARTER AS A MODEL FOR ISRAEL'S BASIC LAWS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Appeal; Political science; Politics; Law; Phenomenon; Demographics; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.05953339464986374,"score_gpt":0.28356488204668673,"score_spread":0.224031487396823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1594513305","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010097257,0.00079414406,0.007315001,0.02124297,0.0002831389,0.00013576205,0.000757865,0.00008586904,0.959288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70536125,0.0020177015,0.020266222,0.00556307,0.00023755954,0.00033701127,0.0006677916,0.0001342429,0.26541513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955083,0.000783949,0.00007218046,0.00037416298,0.0018435838,0.0014178382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99716514,0.00038243033,0.0001039424,0.00020072103,0.0015970593,0.00055080256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032523307,0.0007361401,0.00063814025,0.003362473,0.01450829,0.012634237,0.0024689962,0.0034484514,0.01495963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004695122,0.00049214927,0.00079397426,0.0036469623,0.012089965,0.0033743153,0.0017867908,0.005972783,0.0010506955],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016236075,0.0000026642972,0.000031620235,0.0000019630857,5.438705e-7,0.000004696299,0.00013637182,0.00024066777,0.000008671036,0.99418074,0.0047462056,0.0006442235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059552647,0.000014438071,0.0014331542,0.00013257973,0.00002081203,0.000047854635,0.0016570287,0.0055674077,0.00013304075,0.58901525,0.40181565,0.000103161954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9786647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9832871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13575737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13575737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15408131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9849933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595234002","doi":"10.21991/c9xd3m","title":"THE CHARTER ... IN THE HOLY LAND?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Historical and Archaeological Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Pure land; Political science; History; Archaeology; Law","score_opus":0.06226479516162664,"score_gpt":0.21835346390540408,"score_spread":0.15608866874377744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595234002","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02278839,0.008155392,0.003007717,0.219376,0.0042212345,0.00003014242,0.00022737737,0.0000975878,0.7420961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6433936,0.0036242104,0.0016756781,0.0206412,0.0016510683,0.00005574609,0.00016687432,0.00015949963,0.3286322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780494,0.00079873344,0.000048949325,0.00024277232,0.00051032554,0.0005942675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988871,0.00030790336,0.00013180745,0.00015931325,0.00028023348,0.00023371082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020097625,0.00020748923,0.00024931427,0.00067609985,0.010245564,0.010548942,0.00080575835,0.002921892,0.01650422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004390906,0.00018156104,0.00015582568,0.0014781253,0.016735889,0.007155996,0.002493534,0.005210453,0.001857325],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009201736,0.000006714617,0.00020869466,0.000012597569,9.195749e-7,0.00003468287,0.0024219812,0.000042348256,0.00006849536,0.9169786,0.072402194,0.007813656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009588038,0.000010201091,0.0014859772,0.00009357428,0.0000026393648,0.000037392445,0.0070635322,0.00006711782,0.00018279278,0.0750659,0.9159662,0.000015159798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.063433886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09398307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.063433886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077135796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010595358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12612933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595268387","doi":"10.21991/c9f96c","title":"Quelques opportunités et défis conceptuels, fonctionnels et politiques du fédéralisme","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political and Social Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.07507436158192901,"score_gpt":0.3546377480954349,"score_spread":0.2795633865135059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595268387","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028602136,0.03469713,0.18298897,0.14404748,0.0027693582,0.00011105707,0.00070470653,0.00036153305,0.60571766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8549119,0.017592674,0.057546265,0.013807259,0.0020489197,0.00045670016,0.00040348544,0.00031730218,0.05291538],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837136,0.008657778,0.00061074767,0.0023903495,0.0034490714,0.0011784232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99271834,0.00425456,0.00073658023,0.0010752054,0.0009566057,0.00025874766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011593569,0.00075158564,0.0008087087,0.0031496151,0.0056697875,0.011991442,0.0011204083,0.0040941895,0.0064286874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014571482,0.0006192803,0.00089788716,0.0036356635,0.019103287,0.010527178,0.0033052706,0.009443932,0.0011523564],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044026006,0.0000023211896,0.000093677096,0.000020116642,0.000004020183,0.000007437219,0.00028353394,0.00008988422,0.00003270461,0.9959816,0.0012756302,0.0022046135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019278401,0.000017087114,0.0008803035,0.000241286,0.000022017002,0.00014223065,0.00080939813,0.0007272038,0.0004402246,0.8181013,0.17855962,0.000040075967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011711473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018464135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011991442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009944401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007595684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07215196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595793275","doi":"10.21991/c98w9t","title":"Jurisdictional Justice, Democracy and the Story of Insite","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Public administration; Law; Downtown; Grassroots; Politics; Charter; Government (linguistics); Political science; Jurisdiction; Business; Medicine","score_opus":0.027600263680548957,"score_gpt":0.30517628435862443,"score_spread":0.27757602067807546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595793275","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03947547,0.0112074,0.0022585827,0.55936193,0.0020008911,0.000025083289,0.000093203365,0.000043685624,0.3855338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8896803,0.0033171317,0.00035117767,0.06563889,0.0017331823,0.000053947468,0.00004999199,0.000071316754,0.039103992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99316096,0.0033349514,0.0000885059,0.00055271265,0.00080347154,0.0020593642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956185,0.002826234,0.0002527846,0.0003079513,0.0002756188,0.0007189018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062786667,0.00029172585,0.000569034,0.00095050177,0.034156114,0.015054128,0.0014721153,0.0117155695,0.005432065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009288092,0.00043555934,0.0003205228,0.001245476,0.08132557,0.0133517925,0.010495636,0.024839448,0.0005650303],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007881555,0.000010198496,0.00013600627,0.000011607839,0.0000024276883,0.00014748874,0.021331517,0.00004784995,0.000020895963,0.9567606,0.019107655,0.0024159716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026273327,0.000015681848,0.00039415612,0.00015460096,0.000004870452,0.00021811794,0.022750024,0.00012413038,0.00009568116,0.4572442,0.51894796,0.000024325982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030654702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045911152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034156114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011662258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00756709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.084616005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1597300592","doi":"10.21991/c9bd53","title":"An Argument Against Accreditation of Trinity Western University's Proposed Law School","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Accreditation; Consolidation (business); Law; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Management; Library science; Sociology; Medicine; Accounting; Computer science; Ethnology; Economics","score_opus":0.029456278135004763,"score_gpt":0.3230202419182415,"score_spread":0.29356396378323674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1597300592","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030196521,0.00073300366,0.0018706206,0.63158995,0.0048496225,0.00017984034,0.00012311764,0.00017850498,0.3302788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4172414,0.00030742114,0.0020807108,0.384556,0.0031767741,0.0005614925,0.00008456896,0.00019067162,0.19180097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96676934,0.010219296,0.0013183801,0.0032904008,0.009454419,0.008948071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90183115,0.05132836,0.003808206,0.0067708483,0.022813248,0.013448159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039991483,0.00048694602,0.00088376726,0.0015934212,0.021786517,0.014717706,0.0046007833,0.043166425,0.021550344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1273673,0.001327572,0.00093860104,0.0014694716,0.017861657,0.007083384,0.009136704,0.0325246,0.0038229416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009405822,0.00009626093,0.0024259796,0.00005336702,0.000015469079,0.0002842792,0.004829618,0.00013976221,0.00022476006,0.6243512,0.3600322,0.007453103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026678212,0.00016957414,0.0109749315,0.00078953174,0.000081603066,0.00022198161,0.006888649,0.0012595751,0.0014745106,0.06760739,0.91002876,0.00023683875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15023452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25238898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98398316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016016863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05840913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29872012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1598691393","doi":"10.21991/c9p07t","title":"THE REGULATION OF PRIVATE HEALTH CARE UNDER THE CANADA HEALTH ACT AND THE CANADIAN CHARTER","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Health care; Legislature; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Business; Health policy; Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.030519110586481518,"score_gpt":0.27547434307326224,"score_spread":0.24495523248678072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1598691393","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033587147,0.009550094,0.0051234276,0.32370844,0.0041922648,0.0007594618,0.00598921,0.00030476358,0.61678517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49294207,0.007969604,0.0169844,0.17170769,0.0021706528,0.0009655427,0.0023579772,0.0003035015,0.30459845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94879633,0.006418526,0.0017388909,0.002943938,0.02531211,0.014790238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95469403,0.0111265,0.0020515942,0.0024530308,0.020669095,0.009005802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016123505,0.0009929537,0.0014396104,0.0031844492,0.025999164,0.015867522,0.0049239965,0.016598586,0.0076676346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043005507,0.0021369897,0.0017877596,0.0050319433,0.017244749,0.003636963,0.0044030845,0.020337854,0.0007357923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045442124,0.000045704986,0.0012769811,0.000075402364,0.00003224189,0.00011256832,0.002664473,0.00065248564,0.00030374437,0.8780059,0.111344144,0.0054409546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029911188,0.000059092163,0.034779023,0.0008454719,0.00014036777,0.00012427737,0.003512807,0.002906328,0.00070100604,0.086165294,0.8698579,0.00060933625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9969303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99799806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7861591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21384092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.55730647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9118331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1601773008","doi":"10.21991/c9c372","title":"THE DUNMORE DEPARTURE: SECTION 1 AND VULNERABLE GROUPS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Supreme court; Statutory law; Law; Government (linguistics); Political science; High Court; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.023105030115451685,"score_gpt":0.25628191373596904,"score_spread":0.23317688362051736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1601773008","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035767473,0.004831173,0.002775066,0.2017351,0.0016199334,0.000080668346,0.0001955572,0.000041268882,0.75295377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.622353,0.002765459,0.0017691175,0.17184334,0.0012385142,0.00021934762,0.00015871754,0.00011556178,0.19953695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99296415,0.0014457623,0.00015592253,0.0012796748,0.0019744707,0.002180119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981343,0.00068772637,0.00015922917,0.00020158384,0.00029200994,0.00052515144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046721953,0.00051869516,0.0005255122,0.0009176797,0.030826043,0.011532553,0.0023161045,0.01602395,0.0073483614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069740815,0.000572304,0.00050717976,0.0009750973,0.027034389,0.005797379,0.009175716,0.0154048735,0.0008195911],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010495643,0.000006665363,0.00037738652,0.000016746082,0.00000214722,0.00011934644,0.005385374,0.000029078261,0.00012206602,0.96374696,0.026494294,0.0036893578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030691994,0.000031068594,0.0022342,0.00035498152,0.000013962612,0.00016301927,0.009377503,0.00010100284,0.0003168229,0.19454643,0.7927791,0.00005119395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.58086354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74751574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58086354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028624268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035154525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8432097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1603337498","doi":"10.21991/c9b952","title":"THE PREAMBLE, JUDICIAL INDEPENDANCE AND JUDICIAL INTEGRITY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Preamble; Political science; Law; Computer science; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.04632287987767642,"score_gpt":0.28452991552726187,"score_spread":0.23820703564958545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1603337498","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12757707,0.02100592,0.016761115,0.11580243,0.0010578164,0.00009355728,0.00020471028,0.0000298591,0.71746755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768638,0.0022629488,0.0019819746,0.0046429927,0.0006630052,0.00011122011,0.00003947322,0.0000199385,0.013414581],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945478,0.0027176677,0.0003344204,0.00065803545,0.00072891527,0.0010131671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98230594,0.011889892,0.0019431902,0.0013782542,0.0016216178,0.0008611809],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077862404,0.00034062122,0.0007731775,0.0015643366,0.0091982735,0.008939563,0.0014890693,0.0074312137,0.0058898292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02201927,0.00047976463,0.0005429384,0.0016756776,0.03814598,0.012134537,0.004722807,0.012530717,0.0006710974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013701137,0.000011649892,0.00012472343,0.00001250842,0.0000028353386,0.000030517029,0.001036234,0.00004039038,0.00004242664,0.9955778,0.0014650115,0.0016422371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031114545,0.000025177633,0.0011978728,0.00010065522,0.000010214114,0.000073624644,0.0015614597,0.00011204769,0.00012425955,0.976948,0.01979558,0.000020025669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057275714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007947745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0091982735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024992109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057293912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041178107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1603399318","doi":"10.21991/c9637h","title":"Conacher Missed the Mark on Constitutional Conventions and Fixed Election Dates","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Appeal; Statute; Convention; Political science; Constitution; Jurisprudence; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.0370479173186611,"score_gpt":0.29106634295021544,"score_spread":0.25401842563155436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1603399318","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02105521,0.009591213,0.018614208,0.70706683,0.007059553,0.00010813565,0.0003807506,0.00016583322,0.23595822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60357267,0.005327073,0.010778675,0.26851723,0.0041268575,0.00020677694,0.00013072987,0.00031451482,0.10702545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9824471,0.005568757,0.00076536107,0.0032380458,0.005653956,0.0023268226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97199136,0.020767694,0.0006297028,0.0013176498,0.004164476,0.0011289999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014624998,0.00059434253,0.00081421965,0.0021917662,0.020645078,0.013308062,0.003105152,0.013629249,0.0060985703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03997867,0.00072617363,0.0005404173,0.0019938736,0.044106133,0.01632464,0.0060392185,0.03393024,0.0010267685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071813256,0.0000044573026,0.000103414495,0.000017399581,0.0000016181368,0.00002952261,0.0020056507,0.00004893646,0.000052567444,0.9664366,0.026120787,0.005171815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023453811,0.000026598733,0.00073563715,0.0003792867,0.000012526353,0.00011245264,0.004501979,0.0005101376,0.00071983685,0.29712242,0.6957664,0.00008921308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41613626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49298286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41613626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029816872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031089999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82742816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1604506782","doi":"10.21991/c9j08z","title":"WHITE PICKET FENCES: RECOGNIZING ABORIGINAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN AUSTRALIA’S PSYCHOLOGICAL TERRA NULLIUS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Picketing; White (mutation); Property (philosophy); Property rights; White paper; Law; Political science; History; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.07533235578248645,"score_gpt":0.34960530383390626,"score_spread":0.2742729480514198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1604506782","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23587343,0.0042090886,0.0026919483,0.6311762,0.0015933318,0.00019043167,0.00004456967,0.000028072765,0.12419286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9084747,0.0026923872,0.003332543,0.046030138,0.0005746436,0.00030014775,0.000037442314,0.00003347405,0.038524568],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99559045,0.0016811518,0.00021200383,0.00028450688,0.0008692397,0.0013627462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99530584,0.0019895646,0.00037226506,0.00023317714,0.00089523534,0.0012038634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009330962,0.00031011342,0.00043635725,0.0012116376,0.01862099,0.0061816103,0.0019967384,0.008140691,0.0036155167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012063544,0.0004704323,0.00049164897,0.00060247496,0.015111335,0.0071050045,0.009186894,0.017230008,0.00027204305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002804691,0.00018232739,0.014428445,0.0001538038,0.000011909244,0.0021291524,0.6556148,0.00014370272,0.00088583474,0.2042517,0.061452687,0.060717512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020231162,0.00007781163,0.03917329,0.0009856815,0.000034129815,0.0013694626,0.62743825,0.00055015273,0.000724485,0.07227698,0.25723547,0.000114014016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24350242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40672734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24350242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008558012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034049433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4841702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1605094561","doi":"10.21991/c9x68f","title":"Cooperative Federalism in Search of a Normative Justification: Considering the Principle of Federal Loyalty","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Loyalty; Normative; Political science; Federal law; Law; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology; Legislation; Politics","score_opus":0.03309826142050176,"score_gpt":0.3159430235126354,"score_spread":0.28284476209213366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1605094561","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10846757,0.002091925,0.0697207,0.19818759,0.00043570605,0.00012915295,0.0001391487,0.000102750564,0.6207255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9751736,0.00034949524,0.006317027,0.0066497503,0.00016035381,0.00007038502,0.000026967531,0.000023758172,0.01122868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903296,0.003198163,0.0002243271,0.0012843835,0.0026266994,0.0023367195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941603,0.002655229,0.0003314322,0.00066079857,0.0016010142,0.0005912657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0126507,0.00026488738,0.0006676383,0.001534899,0.012637414,0.00843551,0.0022846642,0.007331241,0.0030152733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015997846,0.0002678789,0.00064129324,0.0015959562,0.039389223,0.0072006704,0.0037608033,0.0072171194,0.00026120027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010955158,0.0000011112862,0.000051576557,0.0000015886409,6.772457e-7,0.0000071521745,0.00039381688,0.000057207606,0.000014733084,0.99864763,0.00039593136,0.00042752412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013869054,0.000006251356,0.00046267008,0.000038733702,0.0000061572905,0.000022794093,0.0012342866,0.0010587367,0.00011987172,0.974358,0.022661505,0.00001712317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41494262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.485729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41494262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027604848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039917536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82505476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1605711693","doi":"10.21991/c9bq1p","title":"Canada's Re-emerging Division of Powers and the Unrealized Force of Reciprocal Interjurisdictional Immunity","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Political science; Supreme court; Reciprocal; Separation of powers; Government (linguistics); Law; Law and economics; Qualified immunity; Public administration; Sociology; Constitution","score_opus":0.0235577028077574,"score_gpt":0.2628474321849137,"score_spread":0.23928972937715628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1605711693","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15888976,0.0072188107,0.007134994,0.22860254,0.000738072,0.000050086706,0.00022873127,0.00010973966,0.59702736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9676893,0.0011503967,0.0012375397,0.0077077104,0.00007448881,0.000011299063,0.000021736812,0.00001988272,0.022087626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99559695,0.0004688203,0.00007526175,0.000579744,0.0018162713,0.0014630787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99745756,0.0007479418,0.00014482846,0.00018532165,0.00087236776,0.0005919027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028409667,0.00017641143,0.00030986397,0.0009221169,0.017620329,0.009842623,0.0014168627,0.0037105246,0.0031317393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063974317,0.00025279843,0.00028369206,0.0013872974,0.02323543,0.0024326572,0.002905004,0.006424227,0.00016533905],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056290933,0.0000025646725,0.00038552287,0.000011337296,0.0000026257023,0.0000568218,0.0027640096,0.00010463106,0.00009421066,0.9880014,0.004440027,0.004131281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000075817836,0.000029084174,0.009998244,0.00031160016,0.000055699627,0.00026824942,0.014972807,0.0019194522,0.0009363436,0.39394212,0.5773823,0.00010828158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9727629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98735565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.096676834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.096676834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14308281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70144284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1606111470","doi":"10.21991/c9395w","title":"CANADIAN CONSTITUTIONALISM AND SOVEREIGNTY AFTER NAFTA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Sovereignty; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.027503341842709927,"score_gpt":0.24695094003863108,"score_spread":0.21944759819592116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1606111470","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26428965,0.010556626,0.000511691,0.098550655,0.0006937276,0.00007607443,0.002661476,0.000051491912,0.6226086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93506753,0.00332173,0.00035109164,0.0043154294,0.00013690323,0.000032277734,0.0004782053,0.000031416683,0.056265354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99164987,0.00046786029,0.0001654201,0.0005830228,0.003014139,0.004119759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9845755,0.0026773168,0.0008331533,0.00047415768,0.009625013,0.0018149924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004840099,0.0003452448,0.0008343339,0.004516288,0.031564005,0.0132512795,0.0019706076,0.004182395,0.021273835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022401718,0.0005052225,0.0012750978,0.010075737,0.010628105,0.0040593008,0.0039847484,0.008492977,0.00045064813],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013914284,0.0000462414,0.014221475,0.00009549813,0.000080216574,0.00025242553,0.01240127,0.0009462505,0.00016959175,0.91139054,0.04578306,0.014474396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002187248,0.000060590155,0.2024481,0.00053356803,0.00036728376,0.00017344982,0.036031723,0.0014102239,0.0006499218,0.11926648,0.63842297,0.00041689875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9987808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25897315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.25897315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2630101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8594861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1607709240","doi":"10.21991/c9nw97","title":"R. V. BADGER: ONE STEP FORWARD AND TWO STEPS BACK?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Badger; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.05258002054209482,"score_gpt":0.26644261940659725,"score_spread":0.21386259886450243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1607709240","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006128837,0.016246216,0.00055914774,0.9649362,0.0063744145,0.000010515592,0.000028417075,0.000044914665,0.011187371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.043277495,0.017815173,0.0025800038,0.9032283,0.0051503596,0.000070351125,0.00005203311,0.00016728952,0.02765896],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870689,0.005374034,0.0005625674,0.0016104283,0.0033222751,0.0020618543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9759738,0.014833928,0.00093944656,0.0016689186,0.0039489614,0.0026349088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018408732,0.00082665175,0.0016189335,0.001237951,0.006139785,0.010308281,0.0038732374,0.037910093,0.0137501685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060954295,0.00061683723,0.0009452664,0.000930915,0.014828765,0.01979535,0.0061174007,0.03560574,0.005478129],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006605065,0.000053116277,0.0003507206,0.00017059862,0.00004207718,0.000165283,0.00052402244,0.00015743508,0.00013670359,0.31995192,0.6596335,0.018748578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014453317,0.00006117528,0.0006015764,0.0012316355,0.00004149361,0.00020669746,0.0022625003,0.00032512276,0.0005689422,0.3709168,0.623479,0.00016045534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018806297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024406068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037910093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054001017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020197162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09735584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W160939063","doi":"10.21991/c9m65h","title":"NAFTA AND INEQUALITY: A CANADIAN PERSPECTIVE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Perspective (graphical); Economics; Political science; Economic geography; Regional science; Geography; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06069222846449993,"score_gpt":0.2872167756640481,"score_spread":0.22652454719954815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W160939063","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01122224,0.14128956,0.0013155979,0.51227146,0.0024924364,0.00003937562,0.0014349328,0.00005288119,0.32988155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48736882,0.32907388,0.0049333875,0.09468496,0.0044554593,0.00011797805,0.0008672364,0.00016994479,0.07832835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994269,0.00064144796,0.00017307726,0.0004919895,0.0023573278,0.0020671487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909677,0.0019362101,0.0004664415,0.00017297901,0.0049184803,0.0015382202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036086023,0.0012788658,0.0017068329,0.014270359,0.02303743,0.01815074,0.0030525199,0.009417926,0.01814435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075146197,0.0008445752,0.002036711,0.021673521,0.016909173,0.00726449,0.0038778675,0.010377202,0.000499149],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040455554,0.000045608544,0.0020734775,0.0002759275,0.00006052416,0.00022990406,0.0028549456,0.00084613485,0.00010334718,0.89890015,0.07553276,0.019036738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008438286,0.000026664662,0.015861435,0.0024266462,0.0002765303,0.0001730856,0.011224857,0.0014721315,0.00016918688,0.17680782,0.7911782,0.0002989656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99767905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99835604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25686398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.25686398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31479546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86193246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W160993039","doi":"10.21991/c9bm1n","title":"CANADA AS A SOCIAL EXPERIMENT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.025605316115601306,"score_gpt":0.24131920692817554,"score_spread":0.21571389081257425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W160993039","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0838501,0.0025678852,0.0031787294,0.13926774,0.002664269,0.0007908983,0.0067438893,0.00037561235,0.76056075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6649425,0.001401572,0.006196833,0.028572224,0.00031718088,0.0012129219,0.0015642892,0.00016942258,0.29562306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864933,0.0032110082,0.00021025886,0.0012960451,0.0046049706,0.0041844626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872218,0.0022853038,0.00029369988,0.0009697482,0.0050937003,0.0041356906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061428677,0.00038254142,0.0008365648,0.0019192667,0.022971686,0.011705552,0.0017055854,0.0043521486,0.019705582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010327748,0.00040041274,0.0005124701,0.004040272,0.008874621,0.0030733135,0.0033216337,0.005267759,0.0010422118],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017973021,0.00015481055,0.0025785991,0.000071280825,0.000032438762,0.00013349336,0.001903712,0.00083452923,0.00029708561,0.7898239,0.18989922,0.014091201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033286022,0.00010971343,0.008904859,0.00012116984,0.00006894751,0.000048327085,0.007220358,0.001767401,0.0005218664,0.037755955,0.94302404,0.00012450028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9905682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9934111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.873961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12603901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3399482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91448134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W161343513","doi":"10.21991/c9dt0z","title":"SHAPING CANADA'S FUTURE TOGETHER OR A DOOMED ATTEMPT TO ESCAPE FROM REALITY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06111320205127533,"score_gpt":0.28661522750443214,"score_spread":0.2255020254531568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W161343513","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05941162,0.005097199,0.004437812,0.5968103,0.0028602488,0.00014525582,0.00042482693,0.00016346306,0.33064917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7108042,0.0037771966,0.00571773,0.14872521,0.0003701529,0.00014208403,0.0002147765,0.0003262905,0.12992238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9783546,0.002741424,0.00038697672,0.0016179291,0.00532901,0.011570116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98509383,0.0011595949,0.00039751935,0.0006240253,0.0047106147,0.00801447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010459399,0.00085349614,0.0012591202,0.0021798664,0.06024124,0.027458683,0.0044612586,0.016985461,0.010966299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017387,0.00093571335,0.0013059617,0.0032656793,0.036058743,0.009198447,0.013646351,0.024994427,0.00067919464],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000461711,0.000038351507,0.0018754269,0.00007369809,0.00006461367,0.00035235082,0.017918142,0.0009843712,0.000590492,0.8712842,0.092398256,0.014373961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044803004,0.000031856856,0.0043645105,0.0003378641,0.00007778206,0.00009762758,0.048297945,0.00056092243,0.0005080972,0.12391758,0.82147044,0.00029058123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9892614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9954626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7944915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20550844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.56356627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9214976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W161486715","doi":"10.21991/c9cq2c","title":"CONSTITUTIONAL LIMBO IN TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO (THE UNCERTAINTY, NOT THE DANCE)*","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Variety (cybernetics); Dance; Style (visual arts); Politics; Constitutional crisis; Law; Political science; History; Art; Archaeology; Computer science; Literature","score_opus":0.05186781107398396,"score_gpt":0.28046183798764945,"score_spread":0.22859402691366548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W161486715","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69399214,0.0057415674,0.00066410564,0.03183217,0.00019877072,0.00006599774,0.0002769104,0.000027060245,0.26720124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98368144,0.0006368598,0.00020702218,0.0011315302,0.000009918281,0.00002878175,0.000062893545,0.0000070271467,0.014234419],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990006,0.00030325964,0.00001717965,0.00007241736,0.00008123032,0.00052532856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991867,0.0002934863,0.00011264946,0.00006487745,0.00013496255,0.00020729745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012723076,0.00014217568,0.00020805045,0.0010870022,0.009283991,0.003678287,0.0006413898,0.0012118967,0.0050541493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002631106,0.00016885228,0.000107289394,0.0020671005,0.01023487,0.0012974612,0.003800858,0.0024680195,0.00014104763],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011078193,0.000042885422,0.014143974,0.00016547834,0.00001144777,0.0014859526,0.12504713,0.00080062886,0.0008825962,0.81148654,0.013239663,0.032582983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055632943,0.000075251635,0.122872986,0.00083081174,0.000020609195,0.0005474456,0.31309798,0.0006387787,0.00052383443,0.101515435,0.45971817,0.000103069186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6916855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8736091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6916855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02967055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021813162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6202605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W16329920","doi":"10.21991/c9gw89","title":"A CHANGE IN CHARGE REQUIRES A SECOND CHANCE TO CONSULT COUNSEL","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Business Law and Ethics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charge (physics); Psychology; Law; Political science; Physics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.07368352937698322,"score_gpt":0.2598297387862969,"score_spread":0.18614620940931367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W16329920","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028803384,0.0011465889,0.013035305,0.31373006,0.014867064,0.0011730645,0.0004101027,0.0019218377,0.6249126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21709622,0.00034702936,0.007320626,0.24663699,0.006442117,0.0007290396,0.00017008,0.0006032028,0.5206546],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9276982,0.009441467,0.0039568907,0.007031113,0.026186837,0.025685431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9071784,0.040465113,0.003767761,0.008312851,0.017351357,0.022924453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021072006,0.0009812219,0.0026637805,0.0028083299,0.028364666,0.022508917,0.005739551,0.08873238,0.10013609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10291443,0.0025806895,0.002808283,0.0010916569,0.006299064,0.013993946,0.014094312,0.049022194,0.037736125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004379575,0.0015343347,0.004208979,0.00013995319,0.00013699399,0.010963351,0.0037583297,0.00066807994,0.005500402,0.22557701,0.69771266,0.049361896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028147092,0.00039009517,0.007676081,0.00024275259,0.00010103397,0.0066096424,0.0044235187,0.0019033045,0.002069146,0.058245882,0.91747963,0.0005773343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0261141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07291183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10013609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011767208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04475121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3349886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W163994311","doi":"10.21991/c9qs9t","title":"SOVEREIGNTY POSTPONED: ON THE CANADIAN WAY OF LOSING A REFERENDUM, AND THEN ANOTHER","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Interdisciplinary Cultural and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Sovereignty; Political science; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.075331397607275,"score_gpt":0.2769553579604265,"score_spread":0.20162396035315147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W163994311","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08092894,0.008482991,0.0027633582,0.41182336,0.004707333,0.000098269826,0.00040082904,0.00012215879,0.49067286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79849005,0.0031466363,0.0018547795,0.05931989,0.00051088363,0.00007917253,0.00016726175,0.00025884202,0.1361725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9764381,0.003358824,0.000518486,0.0023041223,0.008693751,0.008686782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861113,0.002434603,0.00049493124,0.0007616454,0.0075440845,0.0026534393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012749952,0.00076562155,0.0010870581,0.0027145674,0.07918071,0.024696298,0.0047847265,0.0144629525,0.013211802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0319856,0.0006336536,0.0010852179,0.0045253076,0.042034768,0.010400857,0.010451895,0.027925598,0.0006534455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046396348,0.00002510756,0.0009459238,0.000047807494,0.000024312836,0.00030818497,0.037092663,0.00020431222,0.00023109456,0.87286866,0.07428467,0.013920837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068393114,0.000041741343,0.0075864485,0.0004813264,0.00010905451,0.00020425972,0.07124427,0.00040347807,0.0006959705,0.08012481,0.83864176,0.0003985077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99094415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9942601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17570084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17570084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.33983737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9560702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1652167591","doi":"10.21991/c9ft08","title":"BEADS AND TRINKETS TAKE ON NEW FORM IN FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL PROPOSALS FOR ABORIGINAL PEOPLES IN CANADA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.03219861674361356,"score_gpt":0.2795373486055785,"score_spread":0.24733873186196492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1652167591","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.102908544,0.006717756,0.0041251695,0.4930938,0.0053569116,0.00048357606,0.00086282863,0.00022180192,0.38622975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5905842,0.00392553,0.007219459,0.13029158,0.0015167223,0.00035149988,0.00034945682,0.00030020837,0.2654614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9478107,0.006624541,0.0017715092,0.0026162912,0.020353496,0.020823386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9473394,0.024178049,0.0009697017,0.0023618657,0.017636664,0.0075142803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036134314,0.0007699413,0.0017804252,0.0034838053,0.07311964,0.033073504,0.007091317,0.029529218,0.013487049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0667378,0.0020096067,0.0016464713,0.0051309066,0.02462991,0.00865417,0.009268819,0.03021791,0.00097019185],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006997101,0.000057754303,0.0020107173,0.00007854615,0.00004701759,0.00029893598,0.024019891,0.00080710556,0.0005197566,0.77516854,0.18213107,0.014790688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013958015,0.00006142994,0.0150987785,0.0004389222,0.00022725774,0.00011892173,0.039558213,0.0015095272,0.0014569449,0.08842148,0.85238415,0.00058490573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98877233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80740494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19259506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.39050278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9364753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W166998204","doi":"10.21991/c9p654","title":"IT'S THE LAW OF THE LAND: GENDER AND THE GEOGRAPHY OF HOPE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Literature and Culture","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Land law; Economic geography; Law; Political science; Land tenure; Archaeology; Agriculture","score_opus":0.021040776530191034,"score_gpt":0.19908630078201775,"score_spread":0.1780455242518267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W166998204","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10201855,0.009549368,0.0053369994,0.09847243,0.00032480422,0.000028343722,0.00019499678,0.000044792196,0.7840298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864471,0.00090446,0.00021387689,0.0010080752,0.00009065684,0.000014960254,0.000015514155,0.00001814363,0.011287198],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981584,0.001118069,0.000039693652,0.00012009628,0.00016335039,0.00040036178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998218,0.00092747126,0.00018196876,0.000132531,0.00012037142,0.0004196174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020046483,0.0001795802,0.00030047193,0.0011176122,0.0069911093,0.011488329,0.0006780402,0.0022888854,0.010500961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040198406,0.00017648008,0.00024288338,0.0019062245,0.03509164,0.007025175,0.0036343837,0.0023597495,0.00048866204],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007861663,0.0000052631226,0.00037777663,0.000012173247,0.0000015479293,0.000029689363,0.012667106,0.000042921405,0.000033656128,0.9828258,0.0017512984,0.0022449188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000157996,0.000023063954,0.0022026792,0.00013516608,0.000008328282,0.00009053123,0.057135995,0.0001207329,0.00015351201,0.75163645,0.18845987,0.000017933247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024776403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029374167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024776403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046748505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051803445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04926437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W167087539","doi":"10.21991/c9z38q","title":"UNBALANCED BALANCING: BILL C-46, \"LIKELY RELEVANCE,\" AND STAGE-ONE BALANCING","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Behavioral and Psychological Studies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Stage (stratigraphy); Computer science; Political science; Geology; Law; Paleontology","score_opus":0.15141700479720835,"score_gpt":0.30333767773354287,"score_spread":0.15192067293633452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W167087539","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015807822,0.0020807383,0.04626892,0.22662574,0.009762716,0.0010182261,0.000891,0.00024330725,0.6973015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43545213,0.0010554037,0.038938466,0.25856993,0.011836408,0.0031766277,0.00066997984,0.0005435481,0.24975756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9657917,0.0082213,0.001967705,0.005082341,0.014771552,0.004165381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97523683,0.011525251,0.0012780067,0.0028698537,0.007615274,0.0014747172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024780584,0.0009525661,0.001348535,0.0017561478,0.010930417,0.011362079,0.0040585855,0.027458293,0.024275374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08328354,0.0010286067,0.0016470624,0.0016268061,0.010455757,0.009089945,0.0049059433,0.025321253,0.005780726],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060469232,0.000042031865,0.00024563744,0.00004128381,0.000012490817,0.000072645955,0.00048345773,0.00016881237,0.000264879,0.9363873,0.056547508,0.005673423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016979534,0.00006016981,0.0013019597,0.00025708746,0.00005188416,0.00017219016,0.00038909522,0.001363674,0.0009015015,0.76110977,0.2341095,0.00011328091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011265978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014645065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.988734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006327633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015076479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1310538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W167095493","doi":"10.21991/c9vh4d","title":"THE CHARTER AND RACISM","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Charter; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.02777080619110751,"score_gpt":0.26956867866812123,"score_spread":0.24179787247701373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W167095493","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028253632,0.014508414,0.0032844315,0.374017,0.0034110858,0.00003942517,0.00008936809,0.000033962544,0.57636267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89043665,0.0031061256,0.0013408383,0.026426611,0.0039693755,0.00009898046,0.000037228994,0.00007548421,0.07450864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920993,0.0049759606,0.00017446355,0.00067909644,0.0009677923,0.0011034682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99224395,0.005209582,0.00062263507,0.00065745466,0.00067113957,0.0005952378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008171257,0.00039523427,0.00056166685,0.0018895549,0.014232558,0.012649914,0.001099133,0.01105985,0.0063782553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013845375,0.00039478292,0.00041848441,0.0019112699,0.04926272,0.011656714,0.0041255318,0.013610538,0.00048453308],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033120712,0.0000075554294,0.00006286139,0.0000038288617,8.717948e-7,0.000013892136,0.0017359608,0.000030566855,0.000010178584,0.988696,0.008066757,0.0013681893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021017897,0.000013429432,0.0005256269,0.00011146272,0.000005015887,0.000053211174,0.0037204504,0.0001830807,0.00007194495,0.8226448,0.17262657,0.00002341161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026923096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031494748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9730769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076312455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008809797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05536878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W167291807","doi":"10.21991/c9s953","title":"UNDERSTANDING GROOTBOOM — A RESPONSE TO CASS R. SUNSTEIN","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Enforcement; Political science; Law; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Human rights; Order (exchange); Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.17536705212009115,"score_gpt":0.32126896627456664,"score_spread":0.14590191415447548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W167291807","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010268496,0.005645226,0.00034003519,0.9834748,0.002410737,0.000005256843,0.000011674456,0.000006223349,0.0070792623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.043106608,0.004454121,0.0006646166,0.93647045,0.005153412,0.000038111473,0.000015106426,0.000048418726,0.010049213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99322826,0.0028579608,0.00019040494,0.0012711736,0.0013340252,0.001118259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909595,0.0071828654,0.0002979115,0.00021571963,0.00069008494,0.0006538978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011557458,0.0006516144,0.0010729358,0.0011773054,0.01454345,0.009500312,0.0030431831,0.032787133,0.004632485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021660127,0.00055789924,0.00069577794,0.0018482264,0.035950992,0.02015496,0.0054276567,0.03884229,0.0007238032],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028978391,0.000017267292,0.00017119237,0.0000605543,0.0000047957355,0.00028117507,0.0097162295,0.00013399422,0.00011201414,0.61468613,0.3688565,0.0059311334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024250816,0.000021015972,0.00038873215,0.00064296066,0.000005719098,0.00017657752,0.0089711305,0.00029597944,0.00019327183,0.29893634,0.69028974,0.000054202952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046371266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06817962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046371266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010337905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012383237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09220272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1674892408","doi":"10.21991/c9v361","title":"A CAP ON CAP","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ice caps; Geology; Paleontology","score_opus":0.050280746431130674,"score_gpt":0.25355596068543085,"score_spread":0.20327521425430017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1674892408","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00045183732,0.0061063897,0.002115873,0.23399441,0.14507434,0.00022687459,0.00068824587,0.00041433037,0.6109277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010415284,0.0026517345,0.0011579379,0.4528023,0.060104236,0.0006069554,0.0003074437,0.00074348995,0.47121054],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97586966,0.004718749,0.0010053788,0.0027480864,0.010796499,0.004861648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97973216,0.008172574,0.00068652123,0.002738472,0.0071455915,0.0015245993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010351393,0.0024279165,0.0028046228,0.0032302667,0.018252205,0.02696539,0.004851488,0.061435092,0.10612832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062954515,0.0020140442,0.003389226,0.0022563213,0.009241182,0.01726197,0.009243535,0.06921414,0.06972756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018148206,0.000019933977,0.000015895694,0.000050369392,0.0000040244613,0.00004881075,0.00008581476,0.000048443562,0.000055039574,0.094824515,0.90047693,0.004352217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014009339,0.000011509094,0.0001341023,0.00018949402,0.000009129431,0.000030252671,0.000116648065,0.000084389765,0.00009782927,0.021014832,0.97826207,0.000035735873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029953929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037205074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10612832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009699028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020688493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3550346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W167806711","doi":"10.21991/c97q24","title":"REPRESENTATION BY TERRITORY: A PROPOSAL FOR SENATE REFORM","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Political science; Public administration; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.01910466181290454,"score_gpt":0.25044022210594524,"score_spread":0.2313355602930407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W167806711","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030721683,0.0028953196,0.028722413,0.4374377,0.009946566,0.002357302,0.00066592474,0.00072880124,0.48652434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29940563,0.001985684,0.031741478,0.35389656,0.0099313725,0.0065646307,0.0006052631,0.0006343895,0.29523495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9266736,0.027603308,0.0046004043,0.007334409,0.0137134595,0.02007474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96372217,0.018434351,0.0013914976,0.004777823,0.008058598,0.0036156194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.056270942,0.0023961712,0.0042377464,0.0044754255,0.02500283,0.020504666,0.008687986,0.09296044,0.026464922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09159035,0.003963584,0.006881672,0.003932862,0.020988733,0.020285357,0.019080564,0.045198426,0.009724833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000106697604,0.00022598529,0.00029069322,0.0001351175,0.000050521892,0.0003165423,0.00208425,0.0005772382,0.00067343254,0.9129318,0.07616128,0.0064464337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008708219,0.00043460034,0.002258976,0.00081968075,0.0005499094,0.0007052309,0.0034801997,0.0023731303,0.002543752,0.34313455,0.6422258,0.0006032971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038041417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053810164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09296044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011756267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053583127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29759276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1683029314","doi":"10.21991/c99095","title":"Les droits linguistiques et la Charte : vingt-cinq années de progression vers l’égalité? Une perspective de l’Ouest canadien","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.024295955521158152,"score_gpt":0.30266230978655145,"score_spread":0.2783663542653933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1683029314","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13786517,0.020314194,0.0016408794,0.07309599,0.0008439036,0.000070882845,0.0004367988,0.00008014984,0.76565206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86267316,0.0044330545,0.0006226476,0.0023433005,0.0000995482,0.000030418592,0.000101349586,0.000059396534,0.12963714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972023,0.0005157512,0.000037745922,0.00023269863,0.000523527,0.0014879112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858046,0.00032462328,0.00010071102,0.00010438019,0.00048155765,0.00040835995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025914758,0.00035353398,0.00042974539,0.0020421972,0.022575304,0.012539009,0.0011363053,0.0021784035,0.008804997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037002235,0.00030048226,0.00023922385,0.004282261,0.029936086,0.0037938752,0.003193688,0.005596752,0.0005713658],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026827518,0.0000108302975,0.00088364177,0.000032123462,0.0000024872177,0.000121492056,0.06735532,0.00013973333,0.000115418436,0.9084675,0.0100181885,0.01282648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017334949,0.000020663196,0.010787309,0.000307411,0.0000100334055,0.00007927988,0.057597972,0.00020466869,0.00027196188,0.0349487,0.8956984,0.000056283352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97655076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9877665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12072623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12072623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09672628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8759342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1687549501","doi":"10.21991/c9b66d","title":"ABORTION INJUNCTION VACATED: DAIGLE V. TREMBLAY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.04865781522963771,"score_gpt":0.2839896291338976,"score_spread":0.23533181390425986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1687549501","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18994232,0.015212902,0.0027645119,0.44670781,0.0033552626,0.0003609074,0.00092358724,0.00031151267,0.34042126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6170664,0.0022752043,0.0011226139,0.3213234,0.0010448691,0.00020837887,0.00020298612,0.000118404816,0.056637786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.987961,0.0025630961,0.0007558617,0.0024788752,0.0032091404,0.0030320226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877702,0.007772241,0.0010022024,0.0006047937,0.0016037379,0.0012467758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013486141,0.0004939039,0.001202697,0.0010561987,0.010835244,0.00814979,0.0045064585,0.036929566,0.006060718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035075378,0.0010835258,0.0013357971,0.0010718865,0.006147439,0.0049125287,0.0065685203,0.03158222,0.0009548195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009498262,0.00023914693,0.00756865,0.00044152615,0.00021247339,0.008633516,0.021958532,0.0007161696,0.0040984233,0.6638997,0.2579036,0.03337832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008047279,0.00075174094,0.023802768,0.0011173543,0.0006766695,0.0033620785,0.014582222,0.0013012575,0.006640791,0.07688999,0.8695473,0.0005230036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08702624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12533006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91297376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0099087935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016800804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17303938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1700671006","doi":"10.21991/c9vw8q","title":"A REMEDY FOR THE NINETIES: SCHACHTER V. R. AND HAIG & BIRCH V. CANADA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.04796089876755093,"score_gpt":0.2701920002024005,"score_spread":0.22223110143484953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1700671006","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013605216,0.011986473,0.0029566411,0.46570638,0.00670093,0.00028225072,0.0010187157,0.00030833625,0.49743503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30984336,0.0045668725,0.004654879,0.38760862,0.0012778073,0.0003757026,0.0004864557,0.000248011,0.29093832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9852293,0.0014356034,0.00045442715,0.0014735324,0.006033643,0.005373498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930641,0.0009848933,0.00034614856,0.0004281604,0.0034661815,0.0017105123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006829034,0.0009750359,0.00097227714,0.0018272646,0.031562403,0.010472524,0.0043005967,0.029196918,0.012138852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018118978,0.0009728984,0.0011926169,0.0020274809,0.012889877,0.0038676031,0.0046418523,0.025973707,0.0018159957],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053540476,0.000034127628,0.0009237935,0.000052919895,0.000026754655,0.0002873645,0.0012667018,0.00017032695,0.0003794518,0.6325745,0.35643107,0.007799519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018554782,0.000032990665,0.0037133603,0.00040425037,0.000083844905,0.0002422205,0.001998946,0.00040836152,0.0007486868,0.07483497,0.91714376,0.00020304299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94431174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97503555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059250847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059250847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22276358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.429897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1706456921","doi":"10.21991/c92t0v","title":"A FLAWED SYNTHESIS OF THE LAW","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.04015784934388064,"score_gpt":0.27051136580826407,"score_spread":0.23035351646438343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1706456921","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012409119,0.008234437,0.55103725,0.183233,0.008092163,0.00042869925,0.0010701645,0.0012612042,0.23423399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50307256,0.0032704065,0.42882603,0.015604722,0.0032721255,0.0011378316,0.0007002888,0.0012868097,0.042829163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9627301,0.020355353,0.0030725598,0.0038389608,0.008744915,0.0012581651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9666568,0.015963675,0.0011252997,0.0076510306,0.007669539,0.0009337344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03321945,0.00128997,0.0023587537,0.00929887,0.006546927,0.017517531,0.003385604,0.008620302,0.010697759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06256952,0.0015048269,0.0020518007,0.0032597,0.0276187,0.02979732,0.009513023,0.013839627,0.0024918576],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007218534,0.000005820736,0.000019040335,0.00002770173,0.00000582229,0.000018402156,0.00072758336,0.00018597626,0.00005786672,0.99343467,0.0022523687,0.0032576367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010747201,0.0000056477893,0.00002324816,0.000072516596,0.0000104837645,0.000020868712,0.00035200224,0.00084581383,0.00018076709,0.9679616,0.03050509,0.000011190678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043306528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034597667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03321945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011659608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017570782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17568332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W174120049","doi":"10.21991/c95m2g","title":"INVERTING IMAGE AND REALITY: R. V. SHARPE AND THE MORAL PANIC AROUND CHILD PORNOGRAPHY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Child pornography; Supreme court; Moral panic; Pornography; Fantasy; Meaning (existential); Law; Dissent; Psychology; Politics; Sociology; Criminology; Social psychology; Political science; Art; The Internet; Literature","score_opus":0.05404433395630701,"score_gpt":0.29461359251612573,"score_spread":0.24056925855981873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W174120049","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2885188,0.03053392,0.0027876315,0.36307386,0.0027874415,0.00004669969,0.00003603631,0.000066682114,0.31214896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9493983,0.00790311,0.0003497168,0.026902383,0.0014632326,0.00002594963,0.0000091446545,0.000035874647,0.013912334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794513,0.0013836225,0.00002519694,0.00011918111,0.00022271207,0.000304151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985826,0.00092678727,0.00023531892,0.00006134219,0.000055123983,0.00013880416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002017727,0.00031381386,0.00021005607,0.0004939441,0.005893568,0.007094564,0.0006299885,0.004129077,0.0022449605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004440647,0.00024100818,0.000201133,0.00037086694,0.021169728,0.0063547455,0.004260233,0.009495229,0.00036552257],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043051834,0.00008229278,0.002570707,0.00010425606,0.000009866948,0.0027772533,0.32231724,0.00009421446,0.00050052075,0.6092488,0.03566154,0.026590234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022677375,0.00019870793,0.008157379,0.00056127395,0.000015954614,0.0060732155,0.4318362,0.00027968994,0.0007869612,0.1173192,0.43467444,0.00007436292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054302798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010030972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007094564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002968312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001177759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021536708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W174660321","doi":"10.21991/c9hh3x","title":"STARVING IN THE SHADOW OF LAW: A COMMENT ON FINLAY V. CANADA (MINISTER OF FINANCE)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Shadow (psychology); Political science; Law; Economic history; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.045176162093215226,"score_gpt":0.21153368760219687,"score_spread":0.16635752550898164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W174660321","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040818523,0.0034436493,0.00023901211,0.9648394,0.0038026082,0.00005858054,0.0006434767,0.00004666779,0.022844791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024451658,0.0013067481,0.00034375128,0.94825524,0.001741521,0.000057737365,0.00013656658,0.00007213256,0.023634609],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98437494,0.0014422538,0.0008032022,0.0016382317,0.006045014,0.0056963777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98131555,0.007868471,0.0009605993,0.0004956939,0.005741539,0.0036180294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009725972,0.0013302136,0.002429989,0.0017205456,0.030398991,0.013519882,0.010405722,0.094483376,0.0075954637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028061254,0.0020748067,0.0028093809,0.003913407,0.015251278,0.005793544,0.0043355944,0.060408276,0.00175993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006862228,0.000023813038,0.00106366,0.000087695094,0.00003448268,0.0005351041,0.0044136574,0.0001679218,0.0003238337,0.037075497,0.9537298,0.0024758151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022131082,0.000044103985,0.01012829,0.0007186685,0.0001976758,0.00037156584,0.012390236,0.0006234597,0.0010643748,0.016974114,0.95683,0.00043615545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.973712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9880691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.094483376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08364886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18104015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6069178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W175016376","doi":"10.21991/c9dq0x","title":"THE POSSIBILITIES OF SCHACHTER: A RESPONSE TO PROFESSOR DUCLOS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Traditional medicine; Medicine","score_opus":0.060671339562231634,"score_gpt":0.25846708955799613,"score_spread":0.1977957499957645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W175016376","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000110351284,0.0015518705,0.00005438618,0.9869429,0.010587426,0.000007673555,0.000007157794,0.0000072692646,0.0007309923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001749335,0.0005870524,0.00010031384,0.9832934,0.010488955,0.000040026905,0.0000032628486,0.000019124484,0.0037184255],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9767472,0.00836262,0.0022747049,0.0037039672,0.0055874973,0.0033240006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9448382,0.036736425,0.0023722812,0.0017871849,0.007579479,0.006686412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022653049,0.0015883823,0.0038212168,0.0015727849,0.019582141,0.016847797,0.008553639,0.1342132,0.0059034023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08455286,0.0021014872,0.0030681344,0.0015022885,0.021192996,0.014959348,0.011417644,0.17540874,0.0034824032],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030220135,0.00003253493,0.00007839119,0.00006631292,0.000014878894,0.00036589286,0.0012320277,0.00005923969,0.00010509457,0.013972737,0.98146516,0.0025775705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004024453,0.00002836381,0.00019533884,0.0004321225,0.000028437127,0.0002992453,0.002982578,0.00015897467,0.00020548381,0.010172128,0.9853432,0.00011392872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022478197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039315812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1342132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01653869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022193613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1199972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1781936603","doi":"10.21991/c9ft1n","title":"A Level Playing Field for Classical Liberalism: the Abolition of the Court Challenges Program Empowers a Diversity of Perspectives on Freedom and Equality","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Democracy; Supreme court; Parliament; Law; Sovereignty; Liberalism; Politics; Diversity (politics); Public administration","score_opus":0.12312341857132394,"score_gpt":0.31864253031266854,"score_spread":0.1955191117413446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1781936603","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023115443,0.006117632,0.038971268,0.23468263,0.0017550157,0.00006670064,0.00012579301,0.000106652704,0.69505894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8902989,0.002683394,0.008143914,0.04139291,0.0015120169,0.00015724864,0.00006378206,0.00015160545,0.05559614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992172,0.0029467589,0.00014317676,0.0010516987,0.0027921111,0.00089411146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99491334,0.0027062022,0.0002574301,0.00076338055,0.00072533736,0.0006342009],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009075453,0.00041073753,0.00056264317,0.0016833025,0.013184545,0.013880498,0.0014495807,0.0040232004,0.0052320496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009971757,0.00026422096,0.00038297256,0.0018694041,0.0831073,0.009140309,0.006637053,0.01163148,0.00061042065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003794511,0.0000028643346,0.000033109147,0.000005351766,8.462105e-7,0.000005324815,0.000746968,0.000022755692,0.000022883698,0.99556255,0.001922742,0.0016708393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018259621,0.000011312534,0.00021270303,0.000069315516,0.0000030897534,0.000019543622,0.0011250124,0.00022202024,0.00013266249,0.9012387,0.09693215,0.000015272672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050144184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07668054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050144184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018809147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01780821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13647056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1796699619","doi":"10.21991/c9n666","title":"Pedagogies of Mapping","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Downtown; Task (project management); Class (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Process (computing); Work (physics); Sociology; Visual arts; Mathematics education; Psychology; Aesthetics; Computer science; Management; History; Engineering; Art; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04839671608608985,"score_gpt":0.3153386166776551,"score_spread":0.26694190059156525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1796699619","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030051697,0.0026904508,0.2465933,0.027842436,0.0014345307,0.00040487616,0.00012499181,0.0014503493,0.68940735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63017505,0.0063689887,0.2038492,0.007228909,0.0007098168,0.0014107956,0.00031024715,0.0010051471,0.14894186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948426,0.0033410762,0.0001339524,0.00061119173,0.00072638365,0.0003448649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942215,0.0036819922,0.00029832745,0.0008943684,0.00044355314,0.00046032516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004279533,0.0012005583,0.00039150062,0.0021084242,0.005129464,0.007706954,0.0024270467,0.0027092798,0.023741465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01469761,0.0004405147,0.00073710183,0.0013813147,0.01141313,0.009284965,0.009900845,0.005167248,0.0047940747],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002382382,0.00025934252,0.0013458881,0.0004897874,0.000010473913,0.00040023518,0.09966524,0.0012962847,0.0020044756,0.698274,0.037060812,0.15916955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017507966,0.000065556545,0.00070852076,0.000544229,0.0000057650027,0.00055648666,0.032366954,0.0013464235,0.0012245456,0.27933016,0.68381345,0.000020392818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020177346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002424016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023741465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003015606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039100256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07942307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1798857825","doi":"10.21991/c9995r","title":"THE CHARTER REVOLUTION: IS IT UNDEMOCRATIC?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Legislature; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.062082940363001854,"score_gpt":0.2909810495467232,"score_spread":0.22889810918372136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1798857825","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020071963,0.041851886,0.0029952293,0.5993108,0.0041108043,0.000026408716,0.000100229925,0.00007369102,0.33145902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7518629,0.021426156,0.0017071533,0.10236155,0.0039538327,0.000060698752,0.00014258108,0.00014094992,0.11834418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930987,0.00176064,0.00006854853,0.0005385718,0.0028683157,0.0016652775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967989,0.0014839479,0.00026761764,0.00028590357,0.0006586619,0.0005050073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055969404,0.00034290733,0.00060904626,0.001010516,0.015508444,0.014843121,0.0015759463,0.0046635373,0.0047030617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011668091,0.00023660209,0.00021807669,0.0018346937,0.04077997,0.009264503,0.0027203746,0.00886,0.0005763922],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069730395,0.00000831153,0.00011032552,0.00001747277,0.0000018651773,0.00001874258,0.0025528516,0.000045584206,0.00004022278,0.9471437,0.04027373,0.009780193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022491795,0.00001813641,0.0017963122,0.00019480077,0.0000066575967,0.000027568194,0.007033551,0.00018303574,0.00020958492,0.34975323,0.6407256,0.000028909355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40593618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4856161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40593618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026386507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034794644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8071467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W182551936","doi":"10.21991/c9rs94","title":"TOWARDS THE REFERENDUM: CAMPAIGN CONTRADICTIONS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Colonialism, slavery, and trade","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.08461841856248449,"score_gpt":0.2889212261118389,"score_spread":0.20430280754935443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W182551936","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18357427,0.0030868324,0.025004594,0.29212254,0.0016241157,0.00024274224,0.00013098809,0.000115221046,0.49409863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97881794,0.00041420088,0.0022813075,0.0109062325,0.0004153571,0.00019207392,0.000030915045,0.00007487826,0.006866932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9781757,0.013295115,0.00075075065,0.0016819594,0.0038925654,0.0022039237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.954467,0.03479226,0.0036857806,0.0021021103,0.003572168,0.0013806521],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027576419,0.0006783437,0.00089004607,0.0038066707,0.014341128,0.01618997,0.0020085375,0.012483402,0.008157256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06130856,0.0006343491,0.000673069,0.0033670573,0.027249612,0.017029474,0.0071118264,0.018222455,0.00061983627],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028542992,0.000059180715,0.0006027984,0.000064784406,0.000012408406,0.00018802461,0.029422387,0.0001293427,0.0003129794,0.96003014,0.0044493205,0.0047001294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014593615,0.000049832874,0.0028632365,0.00047497716,0.00005177462,0.00029219218,0.055083375,0.0015104198,0.0015125367,0.8195847,0.1183613,0.00006966319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048110313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031923738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027576419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008046189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066275154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14583975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1827439841","doi":"10.21991/c9w66c","title":"Notes from an Insider: Some Bold Ideas on Senate Reform","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Courage; Suspect; Witness; Insider; Political science; Law; Boldness; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Personality","score_opus":0.042586314329761364,"score_gpt":0.3071328447252197,"score_spread":0.26454653039545833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1827439841","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001149869,0.0035898248,0.00041149007,0.9674013,0.002228093,0.0000071674713,0.00006747065,0.0000143482575,0.025130387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10978822,0.0063721845,0.0014315023,0.8400267,0.005182499,0.000067732355,0.00005857287,0.000107114654,0.03696547],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99001396,0.0054715197,0.000247051,0.0007470162,0.0020408803,0.0014795661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812981,0.011903774,0.00039594684,0.00074162445,0.0045127585,0.001147867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012027867,0.000638431,0.0005334317,0.0011071054,0.01966028,0.011020409,0.0020657463,0.014483467,0.0092410855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027472049,0.00038216202,0.00089349586,0.0019554854,0.014692212,0.010107553,0.0028599657,0.021900665,0.0011553455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022649996,0.000010346224,0.00042519157,0.000058948626,0.000007739489,0.00014825916,0.005809435,0.00016063987,0.00012588415,0.48232564,0.5064264,0.004478831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019059791,0.000013995387,0.00096847117,0.0004201272,0.000011944866,0.000059406953,0.008300629,0.00024998814,0.00032246974,0.068605036,0.9209585,0.00007033945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3448406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4857694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97940755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02059243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020317024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6856668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W183165674","doi":"10.21991/c9ch42","title":"REFORMING THE AMENDING FORMULA: THE CASE FOR A CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.054989791133774196,"score_gpt":0.3082515803233684,"score_spread":0.2532617891895942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W183165674","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051457524,0.0043535796,0.08561621,0.37507063,0.008808602,0.00056049787,0.0001469741,0.00024639585,0.4737395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8024192,0.0014403906,0.045614827,0.09211496,0.006759153,0.00088708295,0.000114400114,0.00030649191,0.05034352],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.953608,0.020172654,0.002821985,0.0073398105,0.010411937,0.0056456816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9499523,0.030985065,0.0027961894,0.008400377,0.00622774,0.0016383525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05634826,0.00078737177,0.002103136,0.0019684068,0.012541667,0.013543897,0.005315633,0.03591025,0.00836419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12637086,0.00095376844,0.0021557442,0.0015621003,0.038884334,0.024760019,0.0071465136,0.037578408,0.0013690902],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007638045,0.000010137824,0.00004247997,0.000009212178,0.0000034206557,0.000041702333,0.00028788167,0.000086516025,0.000053936215,0.9958562,0.0019705703,0.0016304196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009381507,0.000035525725,0.00014778026,0.00010239907,0.000024225863,0.000095766176,0.00029601174,0.000980044,0.00022895556,0.951694,0.046249513,0.000052004394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011017685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007917577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05634826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008151713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01920374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29800165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1838317706","doi":"10.21991/c97h4t","title":"A FRAMEWORK FOR CONFLICT MANAGEMENT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conflict management; Process management; Political science; Business; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.08149919982096655,"score_gpt":0.32364920414586373,"score_spread":0.2421500043248972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1838317706","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021110335,0.0055740615,0.69490236,0.025075035,0.000724075,0.00039201239,0.00034972897,0.00029285677,0.27057883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3092247,0.004463774,0.6239746,0.003701783,0.0014283314,0.0032201728,0.0006938716,0.00027106673,0.053021703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891131,0.007188117,0.00065082347,0.00094883185,0.0013071334,0.000791949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954905,0.0024205116,0.00034400486,0.0005793747,0.0007722819,0.00039329132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009089932,0.0019564442,0.0015715888,0.0052495752,0.009090563,0.016559318,0.0052243513,0.006888558,0.015465245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010339125,0.0011953725,0.0025919715,0.0051382435,0.0264883,0.015660929,0.0060210214,0.0068904925,0.0028798855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.363072e-7,0.0000028199602,0.000010206573,0.000008211567,0.0000017085615,0.00001017724,0.00018376713,0.0002698025,0.00000676683,0.9978536,0.0007812372,0.00087083224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072008697,0.0000035814849,0.000015447651,0.000034747703,0.000003017895,0.000023362769,0.000191106,0.0012184692,0.000016055374,0.9705392,0.027941877,0.0000059669874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01623785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008799061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016559318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011799446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009306649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08561134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W184083580","doi":"10.21991/c91089","title":"FARCE OR TRAGEDY?: JUDICIAL BACKLASH AND JUSTICE MCCLUNG","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Backlash; Economic Justice; Tragedy (event); Law; Political science; Sociology; Engineering; Mechanical engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.06409486659759038,"score_gpt":0.2975601136211885,"score_spread":0.2334652470235981,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W184083580","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0420632,0.012530628,0.0014229054,0.81049937,0.0027539895,0.00003820339,0.00007978468,0.000039452803,0.1305725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7149718,0.0023136756,0.000614481,0.25332838,0.0034187664,0.00009704483,0.000022496271,0.00008804421,0.025145302],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9747171,0.0077856644,0.00096485787,0.004608601,0.004559849,0.0073639653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9478337,0.03684557,0.0034976122,0.0027478153,0.004804028,0.0042712493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025249982,0.0006946123,0.002380092,0.0025986356,0.035892606,0.026116047,0.0068336404,0.07658386,0.01462616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08747717,0.0011524053,0.0012166128,0.0030163687,0.052247528,0.029580338,0.01276773,0.05543411,0.0010748478],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043315627,0.00007567467,0.0005502754,0.00004398156,0.000020535881,0.00043462878,0.010240784,0.0001393557,0.00013095378,0.92272395,0.059635382,0.00596119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000121609,0.000066545865,0.0019337033,0.0005757047,0.000072912015,0.00032280295,0.018236242,0.00056609855,0.0005181656,0.8442084,0.13317361,0.00020410026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08896453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12870297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08896453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0150548145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03381335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17689335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1844738237","doi":"10.21991/c9595h","title":"La signification de l’article 23 de la Charte et son étendue aujourd’hui dans les communautés minoritaires francophones : vers une transculturalité réelle","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.0824361971768889,"score_gpt":0.3441542191555777,"score_spread":0.2617180219786888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1844738237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6824201,0.0036428443,0.003731779,0.041245118,0.0008229319,0.000055568777,0.00020866303,0.00005029297,0.26782262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95737404,0.00039508042,0.00030792612,0.0007321333,0.000082418155,0.000017620954,0.000023274526,0.000021272082,0.04104623],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997083,0.0010787303,0.00007151427,0.00035317877,0.0004761164,0.00093730574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949557,0.0024479474,0.0006587977,0.00037320034,0.00096148666,0.0006028972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045239115,0.00029039997,0.00021765355,0.0007078764,0.012278403,0.0064206515,0.0005245709,0.0013013751,0.0053751883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050869077,0.00015882253,0.00020362141,0.001178081,0.017991297,0.0015346082,0.002280043,0.0024394,0.00027961878],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008879387,0.000023581857,0.008906174,0.00009682226,0.000009181957,0.0009891432,0.51840854,0.00019781543,0.0019472789,0.43100467,0.011457407,0.026870579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012831003,0.00009729652,0.04424656,0.00016468225,0.000014927963,0.0003541995,0.11951026,0.00017308116,0.0018572926,0.009846662,0.8236561,0.000066121924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33002365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4557569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33002365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014245321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0116693545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6562054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1861047295","doi":"10.21991/c9d67d","title":"Placing Future Senate Reform in Context","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Orthodoxy; Sociology; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.02798097432640635,"score_gpt":0.285291566097376,"score_spread":0.25731059177096965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1861047295","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046711423,0.016700191,0.004717114,0.45864618,0.002364099,0.00003616995,0.00023359523,0.000060523264,0.4705307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9354568,0.0068052774,0.0015072069,0.027998714,0.0013079714,0.000071018934,0.000097052674,0.000060682833,0.026695324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864265,0.0082286475,0.00021225582,0.0009633006,0.0010453538,0.0031239616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953147,0.0015744349,0.00033737527,0.00043056163,0.0013748518,0.0009681107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008646414,0.00033665355,0.00074214884,0.001527021,0.0148215145,0.016863521,0.001140765,0.005522397,0.013474207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010259462,0.00039018516,0.0006386775,0.0026147359,0.026256789,0.009428301,0.0075259055,0.011930975,0.0007920789],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000084894355,0.0000066402927,0.00032885285,0.000026505148,0.0000059280737,0.000056488796,0.003746065,0.00018202004,0.00008193512,0.9871997,0.0057685515,0.0025889724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011857547,0.000027241567,0.0029140022,0.00043450747,0.00002528416,0.00008079072,0.016107818,0.000360782,0.00043470645,0.2955326,0.6840215,0.000048882466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09836014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25812647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9654828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034517255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030080548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25044143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W186839639","doi":"10.21991/c96t03","title":"INDETERMINATE CUSTODY AFTER SWAIN","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Public Procurement and Policy","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indeterminate; Psychology; Criminology; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.027964629203116778,"score_gpt":0.22202437775442077,"score_spread":0.19405974855130398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W186839639","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06217803,0.0015755926,0.046620533,0.0403558,0.0044651325,0.000206055,0.00031515563,0.00022594335,0.84405774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8023887,0.00046156548,0.0049432875,0.02019921,0.001062801,0.00020761961,0.00011835982,0.00032783925,0.17029068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98890764,0.00185445,0.0006372648,0.0024411601,0.0027994337,0.003359958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99354607,0.0024515672,0.0002840145,0.0017131927,0.0015398888,0.00046535194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010239484,0.0006786117,0.0015205186,0.0012409945,0.010340052,0.009221308,0.0026336208,0.0098428875,0.022854567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033428714,0.0010624176,0.001641379,0.0011894187,0.015081699,0.01492488,0.0074759726,0.023871811,0.0026592365],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032302247,0.00001038725,0.0001148089,0.000009232552,0.00000614453,0.00017214719,0.00057493977,0.00015263574,0.00010356888,0.9917812,0.0044710343,0.0025716329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037158152,0.000040315255,0.00053932803,0.00010873685,0.0000226355,0.00024383032,0.0011207727,0.00090030464,0.0007003329,0.91714376,0.07907724,0.00006562861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012785318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015113407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022854567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059825303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006873028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07645613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1868689271","doi":"10.21991/c9737t","title":"Canada, the United Nations Human Rights Council, and Universal Periodic Review","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Mandate; International human rights law; Commission; Fundamental rights; Law; Promotion (chess); Transparency (behavior); Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.07843411927388214,"score_gpt":0.28236564935882386,"score_spread":0.20393153008494172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1868689271","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026674822,0.15452164,0.002637747,0.563187,0.05394436,0.0036652302,0.015063954,0.00052646094,0.20378609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.043739114,0.13756959,0.021253271,0.44842172,0.021668816,0.0072868704,0.011925042,0.0006249825,0.30751058],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.90970856,0.010722675,0.008558872,0.002731771,0.06170022,0.0065779947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5865097,0.06036923,0.013832358,0.015780794,0.30563354,0.017874368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07804838,0.0011379226,0.0032675548,0.017379344,0.008182939,0.009971776,0.006614666,0.020295419,0.0139001245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2376086,0.0023125813,0.0023986711,0.013700808,0.006877668,0.004062487,0.0036888027,0.0140965665,0.0033602223],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005486418,0.000032997446,0.0006038541,0.001184929,0.000050932184,0.00008284252,0.00015451801,0.0001161045,0.00007435905,0.012897086,0.96164113,0.023106279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008674387,0.000021599342,0.005510323,0.005169873,0.00019032425,0.000061995,0.00016865735,0.00015019705,0.00017891864,0.005483543,0.98290145,0.000076418444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78137904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83678967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21862096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053115267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.42064404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4398169},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1869387443","doi":"10.21991/c9xt10","title":"Faith in Rights: the Struggle Over Same- Sex Adoption in the United Kingdom","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Faith; Sexual orientation; Emancipation; Kingdom; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Sociology; Public administration; Gender studies; Politics; Theology","score_opus":0.09428515149038699,"score_gpt":0.3258573819259709,"score_spread":0.23157223043558392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1869387443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47201478,0.053020466,0.0008522749,0.28349623,0.0019021785,0.00007974212,0.00008731331,0.000023763809,0.18852334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9658194,0.0051545054,0.00014195446,0.016292948,0.00009637766,0.000017417879,0.000012669745,0.000016006423,0.012448692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869421,0.005813181,0.0008741691,0.0008505152,0.0016421024,0.003877935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860698,0.007290899,0.0011606298,0.00086024776,0.0016195324,0.0029988736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010455294,0.00019614598,0.0005353066,0.000968433,0.014757137,0.013694017,0.0012718684,0.0073280283,0.006409752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018188098,0.00047822433,0.00029115652,0.0012817986,0.01928842,0.0067897714,0.013614591,0.008508575,0.0005462179],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014892087,0.00007512359,0.00940593,0.00027176132,0.000022959302,0.0053214678,0.31541798,0.0001592127,0.00077448686,0.59174985,0.029722955,0.046929307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000555479,0.00012398993,0.031355444,0.00213114,0.00002378993,0.00235405,0.32251683,0.00023745537,0.0004194097,0.032565765,0.60806006,0.00015652047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27124605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33697087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27124605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01858654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014049916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5393344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1881710185","doi":"10.21991/c92378","title":"FROM MARGINALIZED DISCOURSES TO TENDER EMBRACES: BUILDING A NEW FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION JURISPRUDENCE IN SOUTH AFRICA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Freedom of expression; Expression (computer science); Law; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; Human rights; Computer science","score_opus":0.05095967262843192,"score_gpt":0.31197599485480704,"score_spread":0.2610163222263751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1881710185","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47447672,0.007017957,0.039209485,0.13992769,0.00054428,0.00046782513,0.000059447753,0.00008278855,0.33821377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99127805,0.00047239428,0.0032008623,0.0012801507,0.000032619493,0.00010552268,0.00000848572,0.000039677307,0.0035821372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98658204,0.008971799,0.0005012642,0.0008900814,0.0014340561,0.0016207817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98256,0.01321481,0.0007974153,0.001196746,0.0008696111,0.0013614511],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018924614,0.00047415547,0.00086493045,0.0020758733,0.022020431,0.018429,0.0020964404,0.0044394373,0.0045340066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023871768,0.000898312,0.0005557021,0.0014012046,0.07424931,0.019541966,0.023446804,0.011727765,0.00032780707],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014654253,0.000024895438,0.00029867192,0.00009803124,0.0000041731173,0.0003055074,0.34089637,0.0001358806,0.0008097666,0.6500577,0.0006960362,0.006658424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005855224,0.00005584063,0.0018662504,0.0008973011,0.000030465626,0.00032952667,0.3209889,0.00071998616,0.0017043697,0.5054003,0.16787851,0.000070097645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010189693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012110661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022020431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0131475525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021542735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10008407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1889813613","doi":"10.21991/c9vm19","title":"AFTER 30 OCTOBER 1995","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science","score_opus":0.03229808555469514,"score_gpt":0.2718328098626446,"score_spread":0.23953472430794942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1889813613","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027197331,0.007966764,0.0018867323,0.03915561,0.08305811,0.0023000892,0.009874656,0.0011646856,0.827396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018710947,0.00026566838,0.0001438802,0.004938405,0.0010180294,0.00017759023,0.0009308147,0.00011445319,0.97370017],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941461,0.00032823888,0.00016350258,0.0005601943,0.0021109963,0.0026908426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954855,0.0003718624,0.00017434394,0.0003001954,0.0019366607,0.0017313779],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004857756,0.0008647404,0.00082466437,0.0029575443,0.0063668606,0.009718884,0.0020802328,0.008443966,0.21373051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009350098,0.000513287,0.0010053957,0.0013836847,0.001575422,0.0027935156,0.004400894,0.0052787843,0.0941518],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009851212,0.0003239715,0.0024402176,0.0001830947,0.000029211096,0.0011926398,0.00076169585,0.00016996558,0.0015023955,0.036064666,0.91320264,0.043144386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050396382,0.000058673515,0.0064520994,0.000056151035,0.000005425365,0.00004061135,0.00028669226,0.00002207205,0.0003872412,0.0012037216,0.99141836,0.0000184434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059895717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1376152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21373051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007911033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076451832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7149998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W189483094","doi":"10.21991/c9466j","title":"REFORMING OUR POLITICAL DISCOURSE: THE NATIONAL INTEREST IN A TRANSNATIONAL WORLD","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; National interest; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.09164859159163281,"score_gpt":0.3448534780588983,"score_spread":0.2532048864672655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W189483094","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.091438994,0.008179512,0.012638134,0.4844981,0.0020744978,0.00004509511,0.0000635701,0.00006985878,0.40099218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9688654,0.0013836164,0.001820891,0.012056998,0.000577154,0.000080962986,0.000021255639,0.00009542883,0.015098279],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98758906,0.009465156,0.00018993767,0.00082377566,0.0007846332,0.0011474858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99197316,0.0052841716,0.0004551849,0.0005847338,0.0006352397,0.0010675084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016260061,0.0005798888,0.0007485496,0.0021209347,0.027534116,0.034673996,0.0021923827,0.01423769,0.0075794114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013036935,0.00046485176,0.0006199595,0.0028007738,0.06795502,0.032098897,0.011578809,0.019308554,0.0005817078],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006339665,0.000011301136,0.00006107414,0.000014833162,0.0000023499124,0.000045421002,0.055728253,0.000052194115,0.00007964779,0.94022745,0.0021437295,0.0016272961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028092876,0.000019708701,0.000394724,0.00016271438,0.000016025413,0.00007789666,0.11613965,0.000512078,0.0003141062,0.7179642,0.16433716,0.000033727018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018224899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016691104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034673996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01242454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014458564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09014678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1896722836","doi":"10.21991/c9hq17","title":"Section 273.65 of the National Defence Act: Inappropriate and Unconstitutional","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Military and Defense Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Charter; National security; Parliament; Political science; State (computer science); Terrorism; Mandate; Legislature; Power (physics); Doctrine; Section (typography); Business; Politics","score_opus":0.04644164917256473,"score_gpt":0.2711364385738526,"score_spread":0.2246947894012879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1896722836","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01412245,0.0045146,0.0046887146,0.09598117,0.0065587205,0.00026007346,0.0010529701,0.00016594172,0.87265545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44291687,0.0043416014,0.012272249,0.23287153,0.0028086514,0.0009246532,0.0013089712,0.00032585757,0.30222964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9652484,0.005151148,0.0016785326,0.0025764399,0.021323565,0.0040220153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99149996,0.0031791418,0.0005806703,0.00081674487,0.0034176859,0.0005058817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013839913,0.00055831147,0.000500106,0.001349,0.007797831,0.010255836,0.0025777991,0.011419432,0.005181969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026000803,0.00059828744,0.00049395044,0.0018194927,0.01725867,0.0025943778,0.002469942,0.01046158,0.004182973],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015324307,0.00002005441,0.00040389792,0.000044366592,0.0000040323284,0.000097906086,0.003296775,0.00008484176,0.0002824956,0.9041081,0.08432966,0.0073127043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032085525,0.000021984422,0.0024098123,0.0005160271,0.000024342035,0.00018281546,0.002071201,0.00026766348,0.0005469518,0.087241866,0.9066264,0.00005882792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36575082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38671863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6342492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056216735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7272438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W189890627","doi":"10.21991/c9nq2v","title":"GUN CONTROL AND JUDICIAL ANARCHY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gun control; Control (management); Political science; Law; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.03405555251579101,"score_gpt":0.2670749701080727,"score_spread":0.23301941759228167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W189890627","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49130866,0.002670419,0.004135868,0.015356384,0.00013235686,0.000048299917,0.000053510623,0.000014811641,0.48627973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99693143,0.0001240236,0.00009882028,0.0003218431,0.00005343608,0.000008972466,0.0000032460377,0.0000021475264,0.0024560315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99139446,0.0036631916,0.00025979694,0.00094283145,0.0014089929,0.0023307747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96758336,0.023909206,0.0036523608,0.0017120965,0.0017945516,0.0013484731],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008422275,0.00022962097,0.0004799265,0.0023946443,0.006466746,0.00833207,0.0013585091,0.004689775,0.010832532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02801048,0.0003381467,0.00044889207,0.0019160989,0.029098207,0.006546797,0.003492905,0.005751896,0.00035887002],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032330463,0.00007144044,0.0021039878,0.000012036723,0.000008453086,0.0000780047,0.003209643,0.00022220876,0.00014943494,0.9909203,0.00051345763,0.0026787692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012042942,0.00010736925,0.018655341,0.00008226032,0.00003520467,0.00018923004,0.0103199305,0.0012353077,0.00069751363,0.94737965,0.02113243,0.00004521624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073470613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008041643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010832532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034322436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004409774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044541776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1899914807","doi":"10.21991/c9rw95","title":"Some Pedagogical Reflections","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Reflective Practices in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Unit (ring theory); Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Psychology; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.13527100578387724,"score_gpt":0.44938026772539563,"score_spread":0.3141092619415184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1899914807","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0066009653,0.009260393,0.0058093616,0.7526626,0.06523585,0.0002718258,0.00032167925,0.00037643514,0.15946089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12491612,0.02092758,0.008992786,0.43548983,0.02666326,0.0007646021,0.00040947733,0.001022392,0.38081393],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9794542,0.011612701,0.00057791895,0.001424356,0.005063032,0.0018677296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9691918,0.0123777455,0.0010282195,0.0016582543,0.011391039,0.0043529244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013689794,0.0011908041,0.00053153245,0.001525713,0.009912172,0.0141428225,0.0038706097,0.0060496344,0.03161255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06463751,0.00047799552,0.0010664414,0.0014780669,0.0075696544,0.009941961,0.0077506793,0.021288132,0.015643856],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012310584,0.00025192555,0.00059775886,0.00053373753,0.000013827196,0.0013048361,0.04624328,0.0001996163,0.0010349081,0.06561778,0.8190879,0.06499132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010424046,0.000036326845,0.00023203937,0.00055203185,0.0000051921666,0.00042945181,0.0374896,0.000055492335,0.00045328902,0.008101431,0.95261395,0.000020838204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007028798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009042365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03161255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009143281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007061772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.105754495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1903345289","doi":"10.21991/c9tt12","title":"Abdelrazik: Tort Liability for Exercise of Prerogative Powers?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Tort; Liability; Strict liability; Law and economics; Law; Business; Political science; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.05324074836314739,"score_gpt":0.3134082847570873,"score_spread":0.2601675363939399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1903345289","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031049442,0.014338579,0.014490127,0.3411705,0.003158009,0.00014912209,0.00050421763,0.0001392109,0.59500074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7387008,0.005909659,0.0066704997,0.056877468,0.0036070438,0.0003697736,0.00013700113,0.0001039268,0.18762392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99264824,0.0016961651,0.00055150397,0.0010062297,0.0021431642,0.0019547034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944208,0.0035841882,0.0004788584,0.00042335063,0.00090010365,0.00019267954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067234063,0.0008770955,0.0013525139,0.0018071221,0.006993122,0.009142896,0.0039771744,0.049137782,0.014152167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024050968,0.0012236667,0.001274486,0.0013181317,0.011306017,0.016603064,0.0051841424,0.015746841,0.002275022],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001622209,0.000012427567,0.000060514383,0.000019096544,0.0000067244678,0.00012928895,0.0003251759,0.00013739511,0.00008100863,0.9836236,0.01355204,0.0020364956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053392967,0.000017450497,0.00067985756,0.00018442783,0.00003420286,0.0003980641,0.00067009265,0.0011040283,0.00045497122,0.9269062,0.06942105,0.00007615067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015121038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017331643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049137782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006044442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071614627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04734373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1904988749","doi":"10.21991/c9g38c","title":"A Principled Approach to the Positive/Negative Rights Debate in Canadian Constitutional Adjudication","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; State (computer science); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Algorithm","score_opus":0.01772730111569473,"score_gpt":0.2619739155655011,"score_spread":0.24424661444980636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1904988749","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012600599,0.004015392,0.13794659,0.18861552,0.0013434995,0.00035039664,0.00024710692,0.00009851011,0.65478235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8470658,0.0023756963,0.0745273,0.020602334,0.00086023967,0.00057326205,0.00008634645,0.000098497956,0.053810503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9617656,0.017966988,0.0009361282,0.002755076,0.013618943,0.002957248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98982006,0.005322458,0.0004085354,0.0008506793,0.0030521369,0.0005462992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04173675,0.000668987,0.0008112059,0.004124758,0.020702591,0.017208947,0.0043570898,0.00803805,0.0046003703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023923399,0.00076904596,0.000989238,0.0039849696,0.07785015,0.0065410994,0.006275461,0.012084008,0.0005093771],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021943233,0.0000016587112,0.00003509485,0.000010195286,0.0000014962429,0.000011105787,0.0010309078,0.00006857464,0.000033742243,0.9963414,0.0010568532,0.001406706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022844848,0.000007047645,0.00036427574,0.00012770214,0.000012645526,0.00002892862,0.0012693186,0.0007177086,0.00016258909,0.94030654,0.056951173,0.000029282855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49200588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6805299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5079941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050944466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1108008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9782842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W190611284","doi":"10.21991/c9337k","title":"THE THREE FAILURES IN MODERN CANADIAN FEDERALISM: WHY IS IT IMPOSSIBLE TO FIND A NEW QUEBEC-CANADA PARTNERSHIP?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Federalism; Political science; Public administration; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04066462346384207,"score_gpt":0.24879531748800648,"score_spread":0.2081306940241644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W190611284","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06235351,0.010778777,0.0018361406,0.7401003,0.0011904348,0.00004458217,0.00044743795,0.00007919538,0.1831696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88587534,0.004293363,0.002186517,0.0464674,0.00036322646,0.00006859484,0.00013581716,0.00011004684,0.060499683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902744,0.0016196091,0.00016312045,0.0007305565,0.0031474708,0.004064734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98769146,0.002010765,0.00048117753,0.0004062151,0.005644686,0.0037656713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008212035,0.000428265,0.0007030208,0.0018857134,0.046338633,0.014852894,0.0024797735,0.0070058117,0.009072918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016226513,0.0005606095,0.0006689041,0.0035481888,0.027611375,0.006399426,0.0044474737,0.01181311,0.00045123385],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004392885,0.000023347884,0.0032899212,0.00006204474,0.000022882237,0.00016170501,0.019230539,0.0005679369,0.000119003875,0.8356163,0.12336255,0.017499972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009786161,0.000022726084,0.022101736,0.00050140324,0.00007142292,0.0001349037,0.058285363,0.0016259486,0.00036176995,0.17233402,0.7441457,0.00031719927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99685717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22597946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22597946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.310697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89775413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W190923230","doi":"10.21991/c9zh3z","title":"CONTENT OVERVIEW RETHINKING SOCIAL DEMOCRACY: THE PQ'S PROJECT DE SOCIÉTÉ","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Sociology; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.20021853270809686,"score_gpt":0.3545348189878995,"score_spread":0.15431628627980265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W190923230","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026337458,0.019939622,0.0083011845,0.31179515,0.07549167,0.0024474591,0.022697574,0.001919024,0.55477464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.071486585,0.030841153,0.010333976,0.07765282,0.11539373,0.006449277,0.038162842,0.0039677597,0.6457119],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995539,0.0015264913,0.00020985844,0.00035333645,0.0021003154,0.00027098064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9789779,0.010360879,0.0008785234,0.0010229741,0.0059916005,0.0027681626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041999877,0.00058507547,0.0009988557,0.004914655,0.0024668763,0.0103397155,0.001651894,0.0033731177,0.15087585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02565925,0.00036712587,0.0005251937,0.0079573225,0.002201445,0.009653262,0.006799074,0.0047660577,0.0265276],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001597979,0.000012117289,0.00007419916,0.00041097263,0.0000010228483,0.000017460781,0.0004137415,0.000036805937,0.00009166349,0.0111736385,0.9681532,0.019599108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011786966,0.000008961767,0.0005456744,0.00045232172,0.0000026195692,0.000023645769,0.00034698244,0.000053271167,0.00006441381,0.0025728424,0.9959117,0.0000057940038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008626968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008173831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15087585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073013916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005619746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1910479759","doi":"10.21991/c9dt1b","title":"The Constitution Act, 1982 and the Crown: Twenty-Five Years Later","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Parliament; Law; Majesty; Monarchy; House of Commons; Ceremony; Constitutional monarchy; Proclamation; Political science; Politics; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.03214132816584803,"score_gpt":0.27964751520431286,"score_spread":0.24750618703846483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1910479759","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015282228,0.042680603,0.001553315,0.1354469,0.01475595,0.00017351615,0.0008302458,0.0000725915,0.7892046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20958543,0.011352535,0.0018046788,0.04640637,0.0023163753,0.00015867685,0.00044281437,0.00010101131,0.72783214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959857,0.0005318707,0.00013532762,0.0005046179,0.0018907362,0.0009516003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99793565,0.0004799116,0.00008134649,0.00014009993,0.00094006053,0.00042288163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036985928,0.00039545246,0.0002521216,0.0012879678,0.01064252,0.007881817,0.00060390675,0.006250946,0.009834006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009174892,0.00028314057,0.00028237846,0.0023231702,0.010682812,0.0033111288,0.003355899,0.0076070107,0.001397432],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000191637,0.000015145659,0.00039503278,0.00004225358,0.0000033868257,0.00015376373,0.0048928987,0.000054303957,0.00012330837,0.85274136,0.12807158,0.013487721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005126784,0.0000049084747,0.0014511965,0.000071180555,0.0000029367452,0.00002848853,0.0006299014,0.00002822034,0.00006163842,0.009470998,0.9882349,0.000010486903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.58329225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7068706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9644432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035556816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05789996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83832365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1910526874","doi":"10.21991/c9h38p","title":"'Old Habits Die Hard' - Reflections on the Scope of the Royal Prerogative Following Turp v Canada (Minister of Justice)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Scope (computer science); Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Government (linguistics); Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.030109034237016538,"score_gpt":0.2841475477408719,"score_spread":0.25403851350385537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1910526874","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01035771,0.003098812,0.0005420885,0.9199999,0.0019682038,0.000026345866,0.00009688827,0.000028875786,0.063881196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21016577,0.001908038,0.0005275788,0.7327045,0.000991427,0.000044384942,0.00004831984,0.00012010571,0.0534899],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9759744,0.0040827114,0.0004790993,0.0018158312,0.0070126946,0.010635295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9810813,0.0089450795,0.00062128494,0.0005586546,0.0055089695,0.003284708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021332225,0.0005324081,0.00077692984,0.0011252816,0.041602273,0.019970713,0.0063882754,0.03939907,0.0077111493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040480573,0.00073092745,0.0009460268,0.001922169,0.05715901,0.010198339,0.007015073,0.047444142,0.0008488533],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032440366,0.000029545854,0.0008800446,0.00006936979,0.000014090048,0.00052734383,0.04095314,0.00016113324,0.00029989806,0.5199335,0.4279337,0.009165874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004157091,0.000025526797,0.0041126795,0.000382977,0.00002543921,0.00017170345,0.04832065,0.0001704942,0.0005596739,0.06568716,0.8803224,0.0001797058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93536294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9673341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07383069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07383069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16059814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5356816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1911440447","doi":"10.21991/c90m2x","title":"ALBERTA NURSES V. A CONTEMPTUOUS SUPREME COURT OF CANADA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.023581054991758242,"score_gpt":0.2526187480306255,"score_spread":0.22903769303886726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1911440447","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044299714,0.006072752,0.0014524416,0.19919758,0.0029314228,0.00019755983,0.0011958579,0.00015275925,0.7444999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34241927,0.0029897126,0.0018650508,0.16731553,0.0005336483,0.00015141738,0.0005268794,0.00007180512,0.48412666],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99135613,0.0005489819,0.00013183741,0.0005001553,0.004322265,0.0031405946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948138,0.0015282945,0.00016436119,0.00015683574,0.002072738,0.0012640316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043851044,0.0004343884,0.000479667,0.0013590112,0.02616804,0.0070752655,0.0025523857,0.010026124,0.00886496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009340289,0.0008984058,0.00058601197,0.0023363237,0.004854293,0.0012492916,0.0022397107,0.010551325,0.0008589944],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010069198,0.000043720902,0.005078215,0.00006001834,0.00002885768,0.0009103727,0.0028642502,0.0008055089,0.00092291617,0.46859923,0.5032327,0.017353503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013640354,0.000045248722,0.014515034,0.0003501631,0.00010004366,0.00017137412,0.0043010074,0.0013227758,0.000940029,0.030885302,0.9470428,0.00018969223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98545307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9953751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07545735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07545735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20933576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5474839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1919822269","doi":"10.21991/c91670","title":"THE CONSTITUTIONAL POLITICS OF LANGUAGE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Historical Linguistics and Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Linguistics; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.031830075463824874,"score_gpt":0.23714122416197933,"score_spread":0.20531114869815445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1919822269","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030049255,0.015872555,0.011491184,0.10943839,0.00081912446,0.000035854668,0.000187131,0.00004897659,0.83205765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95261276,0.0022809193,0.0021056584,0.0064713866,0.0018200551,0.00012685733,0.00006720574,0.00007907956,0.034436118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882089,0.0076303235,0.00024132403,0.0013373811,0.001318914,0.0012630819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898762,0.0077597545,0.00041505657,0.000939012,0.0005722102,0.00043782598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008477404,0.00037617714,0.00069530803,0.0023323337,0.009853871,0.016834226,0.0014845711,0.007288218,0.008746422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015567234,0.00068762794,0.0005004577,0.0027389263,0.05631077,0.014377037,0.0033800595,0.008368472,0.00091345015],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002024383,0.0000024009396,0.000025398196,0.0000030127744,9.910679e-7,0.000007093797,0.00045305883,0.00003153432,0.000019182336,0.99800235,0.0009555029,0.0004973523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009827858,0.0000030049464,0.00019709684,0.000025919988,0.000003424074,0.000014907183,0.00050816574,0.00012376836,0.000073748175,0.9582074,0.040826604,0.00000599236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009631068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008786536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016834226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076468657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048868363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05548209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1921973096","doi":"10.21991/c9sm1p","title":"\"A CONSTITUTIONAL CONFERENCE ... SHALL BE CONVENED ...\": LIVING WITH CONSTITUTIONAL PROMISES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutional law; Constitutional review; Constitutional economics; Political science; Constitutional interpretation; Law; Constitution","score_opus":0.06731187242642653,"score_gpt":0.28561022802357255,"score_spread":0.21829835559714603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1921973096","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008480907,0.0027314858,0.0109921675,0.3767335,0.01127575,0.00041554862,0.00035550346,0.0002530041,0.58876216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25001267,0.0020393217,0.010620627,0.13068785,0.0067552864,0.0007611589,0.000405843,0.00023366894,0.59848356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9818693,0.0075696474,0.00057570636,0.0015617409,0.004505771,0.0039178487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895263,0.003361374,0.00079889747,0.0010284921,0.0021083301,0.0031766293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020282425,0.0004864805,0.00052085525,0.00052590854,0.016802229,0.012238007,0.0020145522,0.019788262,0.03173936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03157059,0.0005244976,0.00064592593,0.0006543913,0.008276668,0.008715462,0.008540418,0.017410545,0.00798595],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021755272,0.000036490634,0.0002134801,0.000052735923,0.0000042172264,0.00010774484,0.0024915345,0.000081779865,0.0008153767,0.7764962,0.21216169,0.0075169913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002385296,0.00002759334,0.00065999187,0.00009671134,0.000006375003,0.00008647431,0.002914157,0.0001077588,0.0005433902,0.059579697,0.93591064,0.00004329511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009107778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017792936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03173936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005098142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024929378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.107265055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W192742124","doi":"10.21991/c9r363","title":"LEARNING FROM FAILURE: LESSONS FROM CHARLOTTETOWN","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Reflective Practices in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.06493914130182661,"score_gpt":0.34022518528096196,"score_spread":0.27528604397913536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W192742124","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31262285,0.004836853,0.009155868,0.3652731,0.0015313129,0.00018955683,0.00008292524,0.00017796773,0.30612966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9300755,0.0020849705,0.0038763618,0.012528166,0.000119224664,0.00012016709,0.00004399713,0.00019283393,0.050958797],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904965,0.0054622674,0.00019728582,0.00073037413,0.0012196351,0.001893887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97497386,0.012998924,0.0006071542,0.0012483508,0.0024480058,0.007723696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014908807,0.00049177837,0.0006856348,0.00087769073,0.021273632,0.010641747,0.0024967778,0.004567714,0.0087703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025351109,0.00051407627,0.00046356017,0.0015795834,0.021133456,0.0143482005,0.014761075,0.0149247125,0.0009955846],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019617105,0.00083451247,0.005055129,0.00025667375,0.000016911348,0.0021409614,0.5356768,0.00084270595,0.000401078,0.21876134,0.11040287,0.12541485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009711915,0.00019227887,0.0057600164,0.001007649,0.000012904654,0.0008441396,0.29876977,0.0008082237,0.0008976809,0.12550326,0.56600404,0.00010291613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12758906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23568024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9819349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018065076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028996173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2536928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1933445904","doi":"10.21991/c9m08k","title":"A REVIEW OF THE KEEGSTRA CASE: SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS HATE PROPAGANDA LAW","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Precedent","score_opus":0.06449293183224578,"score_gpt":0.32258342611082375,"score_spread":0.258090494278578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1933445904","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000085243955,0.9975292,0.000030685424,0.00090845977,0.00020056906,0.0000043243035,0.000022062017,0.0000011655345,0.0012183839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011648729,0.9972747,0.00006937958,0.00095025427,0.0002212837,0.0000063342122,0.000038305767,0.0000012383863,0.00027356885],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978173,0.0005681903,0.00035822153,0.0002626973,0.0008681757,0.0001253074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99225724,0.0051762653,0.0008055027,0.0001348012,0.0014512475,0.00017496858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030003649,0.0007916232,0.0018974176,0.008266003,0.00082868536,0.0020685685,0.0012368348,0.0031209842,0.0038178728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0118994815,0.00059273,0.00076205493,0.010000131,0.0017525601,0.002229396,0.0013613864,0.002693849,0.0010451737],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010457483,0.000080994876,0.00059292704,0.05932544,0.00029712814,0.000489459,0.0004603981,0.00020891076,0.0005213923,0.017326575,0.21851316,0.702079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014181414,0.00003178197,0.0021052414,0.039931428,0.00027208743,0.00058487075,0.00031725323,0.00002331578,0.00013467121,0.002698084,0.95386714,0.000019948846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010618322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022103848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9893817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032517912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009320001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023593485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W194682418","doi":"10.21991/c9tm10","title":"FROM AN ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN QUEBEC AND CANADA TO A CANADIAN UNION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Politics; Political science; European union; Economic union; Public administration; International trade; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.02590202601161235,"score_gpt":0.2464828640296137,"score_spread":0.22058083801800135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W194682418","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17269993,0.009079473,0.0016779071,0.35015887,0.0028701895,0.00012632804,0.000542945,0.00009375475,0.46275055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8358605,0.0027770929,0.0006961727,0.02669571,0.00014153146,0.000057296886,0.00012664434,0.000072540926,0.13357255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914937,0.0010088448,0.000108488544,0.0005919849,0.0014871686,0.005309819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889259,0.0006242908,0.00024197726,0.0001547894,0.0026053912,0.00744768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036323436,0.00050714856,0.00060825504,0.0018050341,0.09080953,0.01776797,0.002144608,0.0057753487,0.016379131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063305767,0.00057949463,0.0007709544,0.003478115,0.0154235745,0.0055698426,0.010624796,0.012094733,0.0007711014],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013946988,0.00010870837,0.010525185,0.00011028893,0.00007143766,0.0017151758,0.078590535,0.00097435986,0.0005366216,0.66292346,0.20662245,0.037682224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049886177,0.0000388766,0.018781576,0.00036115223,0.00005792209,0.000213754,0.12259033,0.0003699181,0.00027783943,0.012451705,0.84467506,0.00013199066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9975278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7383874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2616126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.48157656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85642475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1958936762","doi":"10.21991/c98374","title":"The Constitutionality of Prorogation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Parliament; Prime minister; Context (archaeology); Political science; Meaning (existential); Law; Governor; Constitutional law; Original meaning; Law and economics; Constitution; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy; History; Engineering; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05385636001912841,"score_gpt":0.28924830508521077,"score_spread":0.23539194506608235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1958936762","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028554387,0.002739701,0.0019438324,0.031774864,0.00038854094,0.000021351427,0.000113472466,0.000043878816,0.93441993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.922922,0.00067546853,0.00032720825,0.0035487886,0.00016542446,0.000031294763,0.000038183574,0.000042473657,0.0722491],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921468,0.0031226515,0.00015999452,0.0011702514,0.0011514882,0.002248831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965153,0.0015342948,0.00023551333,0.00049279747,0.00074760127,0.00047446726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060859243,0.00020671338,0.0003354392,0.00084752653,0.019204834,0.012795059,0.0009996012,0.0032528206,0.013416725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011376513,0.0003671182,0.00020704951,0.0011300171,0.03241944,0.0065287286,0.0035514103,0.00648905,0.0011987654],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069709895,0.0000027187668,0.00010878838,0.0000050221074,8.715462e-7,0.000022945578,0.0026340664,0.000016630134,0.000039598533,0.991211,0.0045036436,0.0014477153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002928561,0.000023816254,0.003116997,0.00016168339,0.000008447633,0.000076118595,0.011869951,0.00015910494,0.00048828626,0.34939572,0.6346304,0.00004019953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1353963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1864419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1353963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019762548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016548334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26921642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W19611839","doi":"10.21991/c98m2d","title":"Theory and Practice in the Government of Alberta’s Consultation Policy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Obligation; Resource (disambiguation); Political science; Law; Subject (documents); Treaty; Process (computing); Subject matter; Natural resource; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.01125353448632626,"score_gpt":0.2981553040719349,"score_spread":0.28690176958560865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W19611839","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025443071,0.007196768,0.013339829,0.21055217,0.0007556381,0.00015878987,0.00009275824,0.00014220887,0.7423187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90641963,0.0027594161,0.010323464,0.022565052,0.00026022168,0.00018471357,0.00006331993,0.00007589338,0.057348423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9692104,0.015455725,0.0006432532,0.0021020435,0.0054355944,0.0071530133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97253245,0.019400861,0.000886784,0.0015189117,0.0030576955,0.0026033053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027119342,0.0004991676,0.000584826,0.0032322924,0.03197606,0.025982415,0.0048261844,0.015770279,0.0081479745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02578048,0.00068915857,0.0007336448,0.0058372123,0.07336078,0.005967322,0.0075383955,0.007876566,0.00047692508],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004388596,0.000009131933,0.000303574,0.000026743153,0.0000028668032,0.0000838527,0.004694615,0.0004884319,0.000023883913,0.98627913,0.005363988,0.0027193988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004162878,0.000023257395,0.0021403448,0.0008822925,0.00002052873,0.00014061725,0.032784197,0.002521196,0.00020662214,0.5830506,0.3781082,0.0000805501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8477166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8512885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8511705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14882953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25185227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9872371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1962627040","doi":"10.21991/c9hx0x","title":"Complexity and the Amending Formula","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Scapegoat; Rhetoric; Politics; Law and economics; Order (exchange); Political science; Crutch; Public administration; Law; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07189309689036848,"score_gpt":0.3163968659363234,"score_spread":0.2445037690459549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1962627040","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051446274,0.0045311814,0.09219988,0.10035857,0.0024519896,0.00028516474,0.00031354846,0.0005294303,0.7478839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92298317,0.001174976,0.026925482,0.0062108706,0.0010323635,0.0002555627,0.00017183377,0.00023799039,0.04100774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9829779,0.007245784,0.00087332143,0.0022617178,0.0050040986,0.0016371842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9739924,0.013766375,0.0016126473,0.005019993,0.004575706,0.0010328076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014329424,0.0005354466,0.00085504923,0.0027975142,0.009059244,0.013980029,0.0017398687,0.0042130365,0.0111836875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04776541,0.0005291848,0.0008966462,0.0017141765,0.0389919,0.013525392,0.0070551583,0.0083402805,0.00133175],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060475945,0.0000034223403,0.00012097347,0.000013053452,0.000002369022,0.000023782477,0.0005209009,0.00022667108,0.000050307906,0.9923241,0.0021180995,0.0045902473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021640157,0.000014827642,0.00040623947,0.00007899803,0.000009868207,0.00006126687,0.0005209929,0.0012452926,0.00028784337,0.90465707,0.09266437,0.00003163873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021205842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01710825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021205842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012575264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012114262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.091240406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W198008171","doi":"10.21991/c9266x","title":"THE HISTORICAL CONTEXT OF MEECH LAKE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Classical Antiquity Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Geography; Environmental planning; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Archaeology","score_opus":0.05745777018997514,"score_gpt":0.2820085750910423,"score_spread":0.22455080490106719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W198008171","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38648662,0.0067525557,0.0020352048,0.03142271,0.0004016065,0.00005167705,0.0003739359,0.00013366273,0.572342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.941118,0.0013014374,0.00046937205,0.0010275412,0.00012390265,0.000048293845,0.00006421588,0.000066077504,0.05578126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889,0.0002734267,0.000030005784,0.00015665633,0.0001952755,0.0004546665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994962,0.000166896,0.000108143155,0.000033190016,0.00009065052,0.00010484732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088908704,0.00018339665,0.00022547589,0.0015165312,0.013572163,0.005256021,0.00089468854,0.002300744,0.016084118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025297105,0.0004383284,0.00011837108,0.0032468105,0.0086121475,0.0052225282,0.0065680104,0.0036417972,0.00086961885],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077431316,0.000024702083,0.002696161,0.000110799796,0.000008262176,0.002155551,0.08034808,0.0003647869,0.0010547077,0.8747751,0.015725706,0.022658637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016090142,0.00003528027,0.021716338,0.00022696266,0.000011749905,0.00084046094,0.035919618,0.00035492302,0.0012160253,0.043215908,0.89637214,0.00007446622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04915798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.121560164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99128246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008717517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052652336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09774369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W205172034","doi":"10.21991/c9g959","title":"THINKING ABOUT THE UNTHINKABLE: PLANNING FOR A POSSIBLE SECESSION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Architecture, Modernity, and Design","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Political science; Management science; Law; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.03911955077063091,"score_gpt":0.25187427394075695,"score_spread":0.21275472317012606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W205172034","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04638978,0.0032739914,0.09891927,0.3009279,0.0019916384,0.0003036977,0.00010295455,0.00019338346,0.5478974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9028559,0.0013881081,0.042788148,0.010375947,0.000412991,0.00030334672,0.000069136935,0.00014371071,0.041662797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99450004,0.0033440818,0.00014176786,0.0004228358,0.0007869171,0.0008042304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99598557,0.0020698232,0.00029201584,0.0004733909,0.0005004398,0.00067877467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077541834,0.000630366,0.00045353768,0.0009256309,0.009665418,0.011043424,0.001668636,0.010087682,0.014444131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016199071,0.0007491369,0.0008656291,0.0006842412,0.024320073,0.021717828,0.00650766,0.013387017,0.0012454037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014588373,0.000022238908,0.00018162027,0.000024832254,0.000005754155,0.00023088104,0.004884397,0.00080967875,0.0001558095,0.98150384,0.005611678,0.006554725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012040924,0.000021500937,0.00013449175,0.00009296784,0.0000072085495,0.00009398597,0.0066897315,0.0007631047,0.00016357261,0.9437103,0.048285093,0.000026053774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006211015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011160957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014444131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055527864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014835126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048320472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100591259","doi":"10.21991/c9808g","title":"ABORIGINAL RIGHTS AND DELGAMUUKW V. THE QUEEN","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Political science; Genealogy; Sociology; History; Zoology; Biology","score_opus":0.019150832168600387,"score_gpt":0.287044134190977,"score_spread":0.26789330202237666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100591259","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11861351,0.008737285,0.0005135914,0.10757693,0.001028105,0.00012138021,0.00017136088,0.00003275327,0.7632051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62438667,0.002239794,0.0005789796,0.057288818,0.00020844924,0.00022414734,0.000058010985,0.00003680941,0.31497827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99691486,0.00068484765,0.000064439046,0.00018956041,0.0006379538,0.0015084168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99697,0.0016048456,0.00013727316,0.00015613677,0.0004343515,0.00069736945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027892524,0.0002184769,0.00031771197,0.0004586236,0.012581619,0.004768008,0.0010434123,0.0063624186,0.009043048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056845266,0.00056183076,0.0002811658,0.0006227793,0.0069392463,0.001649984,0.00446107,0.005709664,0.00058207195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013582199,0.00004132488,0.0037488407,0.000156452,0.000017415283,0.001093239,0.040149424,0.00015341878,0.00079994067,0.8278819,0.11065167,0.015170636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001086735,0.00008546076,0.020001952,0.0005727699,0.00005440154,0.00035780985,0.031885166,0.00021087409,0.0007683184,0.04671799,0.8991429,0.00009370458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5931802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7702102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40681982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009737497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02747269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8184313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108218549","doi":"10.21991/c9nq37","title":"A Time for Boldness? Exploring the Space for Senate Reform","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Legislature; Representation (politics); Democracy; Public administration; Political science; Redistricting; Cognitive reframing; Foundation (evidence); Work (physics); Law; Space (punctuation); Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.07303947354381972,"score_gpt":0.3052083573826834,"score_spread":0.2321688838388637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108218549","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027477155,0.011336732,0.008317636,0.63899803,0.0024680737,0.00006691061,0.00010660833,0.00009008994,0.31113878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9023082,0.0046278825,0.0035393883,0.05119544,0.0021888064,0.00029083478,0.00008780552,0.00014801089,0.03561358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9544188,0.03605995,0.00041478063,0.0013311072,0.0017647125,0.006010672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98048854,0.010514842,0.00084531365,0.0017349034,0.0022927364,0.0041235895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043169565,0.0004673392,0.0009608068,0.002171835,0.021376507,0.026443632,0.0026234637,0.010583298,0.027200008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03624407,0.00063228176,0.0010616569,0.003222337,0.049119473,0.022423899,0.017048817,0.014128742,0.0022894149],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013943576,0.00001018629,0.000116739124,0.000023112903,0.0000039777337,0.00002671371,0.0034341032,0.000096615426,0.000031837695,0.98343694,0.009433851,0.0033719833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039714887,0.00003434763,0.00061792816,0.00037397604,0.000012620938,0.000032720523,0.019423818,0.00028932613,0.00016156957,0.6144808,0.36450362,0.000029517934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026212856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047907803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043169565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020133186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039624304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22830528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145615668","doi":"10.21991/c9cm1z","title":"THE CHARTER AND PUBLICATION BANS: A COMMENT ON DAGENAIS V. C.B.C.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Chemistry","score_opus":0.043121578666628774,"score_gpt":0.3021434292616512,"score_spread":0.2590218505950225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145615668","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011196589,0.0021569624,0.00039898706,0.9455101,0.01881172,0.00006949634,0.0004688975,0.00011945619,0.031344734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0047271326,0.0005496119,0.00034102495,0.96647984,0.004329415,0.00013472018,0.00009378741,0.000087659995,0.02325679],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9631866,0.0046743574,0.0027007489,0.0049027125,0.017198877,0.007336672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95499986,0.027164571,0.0034056385,0.0016700526,0.008765183,0.0039947378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027198998,0.0023638345,0.0029911688,0.0023240668,0.025421005,0.0183893,0.0110593345,0.16819794,0.014000559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07873749,0.0034595863,0.004355371,0.00404906,0.013072581,0.0130753135,0.0070627583,0.1093271,0.009373864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006695475,0.000050068327,0.00030211025,0.00007857789,0.00001438792,0.0002832782,0.00091503863,0.00008464778,0.0003477546,0.042190403,0.9535578,0.0021089064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017353494,0.0000598494,0.002028748,0.00045080745,0.00007047882,0.00013351552,0.00094851555,0.0002119073,0.0009185436,0.013240614,0.9815139,0.00024950455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25111955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32813042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25111955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021747492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047776118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49931574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152526808","doi":"10.21991/c92d47","title":"A CONSTITUTIONAL REVOLUTION: ISRAEL'S BASIC LAWS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.05232865365993809,"score_gpt":0.27447313081101754,"score_spread":0.22214447715107943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152526808","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.106068075,0.0080194315,0.0024924772,0.12757908,0.0008288436,0.00006065219,0.00022105392,0.000049805087,0.7546806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93620557,0.0015171968,0.0009452838,0.014840302,0.00082107895,0.00006623071,0.00010355479,0.000021391637,0.045479346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998752,0.00037889276,0.000029869347,0.00010927827,0.0002883913,0.0004415622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987803,0.000694032,0.00009188733,0.00012632858,0.00017268848,0.00013473911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042274445,0.0002755283,0.00036376776,0.00089775666,0.004569197,0.0062168245,0.00083792227,0.0042280247,0.0069326744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037983689,0.00019058661,0.00024467704,0.0008248919,0.014578646,0.004647732,0.0018112065,0.0055997884,0.0005237969],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009718931,0.000028637678,0.00011707221,0.000008511026,0.00000144444,0.00002141131,0.0007150655,0.00006205201,0.00009564382,0.9890828,0.0056974418,0.0041601113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000088966524,0.000030319317,0.0032068815,0.000092280396,0.000007829132,0.000068399044,0.0015433586,0.00039287354,0.00045441522,0.7721325,0.22196425,0.000017968227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013645086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013951886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013645086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008542828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062441905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06198281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152932827","doi":"10.21991/c9pw9j","title":"TURP AMENDING THE CANADIAN CONSTITUTION: A MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.049771057810998484,"score_gpt":0.28602659274716935,"score_spread":0.23625553493617085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152932827","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09164957,0.0068403757,0.12591437,0.054616436,0.0014376985,0.0002713641,0.0011201419,0.00034944067,0.7178005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86859447,0.0047799256,0.023708323,0.0027893547,0.000994909,0.00022488105,0.00035731774,0.00017585637,0.098375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963128,0.00055518525,0.00007665009,0.0002753201,0.0016833328,0.0010967599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934481,0.0027886298,0.00041736226,0.0005303712,0.002323999,0.00049153896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005205915,0.0009925421,0.0012796384,0.004924263,0.008437094,0.008743284,0.0032568304,0.004367049,0.008294485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01916969,0.00086385355,0.0017479298,0.0044388594,0.009938337,0.0052907155,0.0024521672,0.006227191,0.00052115374],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001960967,0.0000036524748,0.000071909904,0.00000683744,0.0000033319018,0.000021847343,0.00007176631,0.0059398743,0.000020434563,0.98924726,0.0033258798,0.0012852962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001531858,0.000009316261,0.0011274355,0.000073236006,0.00003852067,0.00004147803,0.00030920323,0.088972114,0.00011962538,0.8801777,0.029059084,0.000057015648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9076215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8766593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0923785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08874963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07807473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6439266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153851746","doi":"10.21991/c90x08","title":"Tapping the Potential of Senate-Driven Reform: Proposals to Limit the Powers of the Senate","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Democracy; Politics; Supreme court; Status quo; Law; Power (physics); Separation of powers; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02554129898864058,"score_gpt":0.28203284412954194,"score_spread":0.25649154514090133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153851746","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07812492,0.00819357,0.044465147,0.43385127,0.0031137129,0.00046099746,0.00025712934,0.000432861,0.4311005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82138914,0.002345231,0.011899705,0.119770795,0.0017490358,0.0007355658,0.00010881023,0.00015145855,0.04185036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94876003,0.0369897,0.001401685,0.0024331918,0.0051164357,0.0052989563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96315265,0.018001147,0.0024999708,0.0049180584,0.008115934,0.003312195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04834019,0.0008590598,0.00085799914,0.00269618,0.0096785445,0.015474657,0.0038069892,0.015779266,0.011700076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06428586,0.0007641354,0.0018418736,0.00239079,0.020971036,0.013414018,0.015177534,0.0139081525,0.002269513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000098797194,0.00007630023,0.0014579531,0.00013492879,0.00007171326,0.00015324602,0.0037467552,0.0014307147,0.0007654004,0.9600489,0.01656821,0.015447026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000339016,0.00050197204,0.005495572,0.001001869,0.00025612072,0.00033086786,0.005490925,0.0034581546,0.0046346127,0.38117945,0.5970445,0.00026688608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015821101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033658072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04834019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012204626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032047622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2556504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162755870","doi":"10.21991/c91q1w","title":"Jane Austen and the Council of the Federation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sensibility; Pride; Possession (linguistics); Law; Wife; Battle; Sentence; Sociology; History; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0513180478118468,"score_gpt":0.2536156607948182,"score_spread":0.2022976129829714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162755870","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0066303653,0.00940925,0.00052394386,0.77298397,0.011980935,0.000021587748,0.000049645976,0.00003616157,0.19836423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29372382,0.0075325347,0.0012613895,0.24474943,0.006290494,0.00013917338,0.0001231626,0.0001728579,0.44600716],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938611,0.0027297079,0.00011645936,0.000612241,0.0014586167,0.001221982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965043,0.00077305734,0.00026968756,0.00015523125,0.0007558592,0.0015418262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039592846,0.0003411046,0.00033385053,0.0007754475,0.02654415,0.009510709,0.0013944694,0.007084132,0.013790163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011840672,0.00043761634,0.00023287038,0.00085423444,0.008079655,0.007528271,0.004646314,0.013401768,0.0024547693],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019322328,0.000019847945,0.00028930895,0.00003372703,0.000002139728,0.00017699243,0.011107701,0.000028814216,0.00006777761,0.16843852,0.8132756,0.006540376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019357306,0.0000056426184,0.00032917183,0.0000663359,8.442165e-7,0.00006984133,0.0058612605,0.000018368362,0.000031176583,0.0043610227,0.98924726,0.0000072169914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054343212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12495653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98780817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012191813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010916642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1080538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163709787","doi":"10.21991/c9rh4g","title":"Time for Boldness on Senate Reform, Time for the Trudeau Plan","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Boldness; Plan (archaeology); Political science; Table (database); Law; Law and economics; Public administration; Economics; History; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.038237889304724666,"score_gpt":0.29062321518572165,"score_spread":0.252385325880997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163709787","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002374691,0.0046760864,0.0010317366,0.92223805,0.016296057,0.00004502329,0.00028188067,0.00011502594,0.052941512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.109840006,0.004537153,0.005421987,0.6998603,0.005169977,0.0001561981,0.00045554954,0.00040590507,0.17415297],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9731373,0.0049572517,0.00060082023,0.0016835193,0.0115611665,0.008059961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9697852,0.0053711394,0.0006602372,0.001321977,0.009452787,0.013408661],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02179481,0.00069022534,0.0007649992,0.0012091887,0.016836215,0.017622963,0.002120162,0.0178719,0.026367065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051319424,0.00068503973,0.0012395043,0.0013632781,0.012521244,0.008175934,0.0063372604,0.028338525,0.005403924],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003579811,0.000027282947,0.00028399436,0.000042830183,0.000015855212,0.00010593398,0.0008431351,0.00013682153,0.0002211377,0.19414194,0.7970036,0.0071416576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021911585,0.0000134863785,0.0006648596,0.000120234195,0.000006812296,0.000027146833,0.0008844423,0.00008595726,0.00013581458,0.00986038,0.9881467,0.0000322515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.58055156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7536294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96495503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035044968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13812762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84383726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2173693669","doi":"10.21991/c9rm2r","title":"The Assisted Human Reproduction Act Reference and the Thin Line Between Health and Crime","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Legislature; Legislation; Law; Jurisdiction; Constitution; Government (linguistics); Political science; Reproduction; Criminal jurisdiction; Power (physics); Human rights; Public administration; Politics; Biology","score_opus":0.04897607700576859,"score_gpt":0.3266017884079739,"score_spread":0.27762571140220527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2173693669","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03747603,0.013183261,0.016121814,0.118551716,0.0033746879,0.0002442693,0.00033336494,0.00018964444,0.8105252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7763462,0.0043327915,0.014065738,0.0608303,0.0020757779,0.00071101735,0.00020851287,0.0001217187,0.14130792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.968821,0.015151041,0.0019568517,0.0037152583,0.007807162,0.0025486522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980149,0.014191995,0.0013376562,0.0017979973,0.0019690755,0.0005543708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02152665,0.00042136878,0.0007150866,0.0020506107,0.0093424115,0.009190733,0.002396284,0.01846147,0.0047830967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04143878,0.00069561583,0.00084183976,0.0017668079,0.03339182,0.005340454,0.005072954,0.011831187,0.001013234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032838047,0.0000043329032,0.00007396291,0.000008959321,0.0000011022554,0.000035335488,0.0013285753,0.000030408382,0.0000412194,0.99368674,0.0029684962,0.0018176155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059711354,0.00013773295,0.0039243074,0.00073021837,0.000034983157,0.00048528722,0.003317755,0.00068961637,0.0008933947,0.44417033,0.54541844,0.00013822337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050551027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05516222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050551027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009117957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018103644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11384517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2173914137","doi":"10.21991/c95q2h","title":"A COURT IN NEED AND A FRIEND INDEED: AN ANALYSIS OF THE ARGUMENTS OF THE AMICUS CURIAE IN THE QUEBEC SECESSION REFERENCE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Secession; Political science; Referendum; Principle of legality; Sovereignty; Politics; Majority opinion; Advisory opinion; Government (linguistics); Dissenting opinion; Sociology; International law; International court; Public international law","score_opus":0.02473364440888928,"score_gpt":0.253101599269096,"score_spread":0.2283679548602067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2173914137","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15697862,0.013592675,0.0020169804,0.15968849,0.0007340502,0.0002563541,0.00055628375,0.000051007464,0.66612566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.906481,0.0023647237,0.00080011494,0.021152388,0.0002262258,0.0001427522,0.00007564207,0.000044508964,0.06871265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98793006,0.002752918,0.00019588904,0.00070662796,0.0030017316,0.0054128645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98719376,0.006090418,0.00068185286,0.0003665133,0.0042393566,0.0014280245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073811603,0.0007618444,0.0013294144,0.0057429313,0.048798982,0.02133436,0.0049609784,0.018167717,0.012925856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021948209,0.0008868753,0.001499111,0.007706327,0.027862951,0.004320762,0.0048999297,0.015437333,0.0005273417],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045641136,0.000023987095,0.0010098005,0.00006042744,0.00003658387,0.0005685659,0.018947743,0.00045639003,0.00015957294,0.95379937,0.021663956,0.0032279845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032768256,0.00010557964,0.03654744,0.002112854,0.0005805324,0.00042770847,0.15159014,0.005443605,0.0010977405,0.19837216,0.6028279,0.0005666968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99216884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99503773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24634185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24634185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16890818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8741366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W22089926","doi":"10.21991/c9t08f","title":"Spain’s Multinational Constitution: a Lost Opportunity?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Human Rights and Immigration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Multinational corporation; Autonomy; Politics; Character (mathematics); State (computer science); Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.0663900262032204,"score_gpt":0.29104981188901496,"score_spread":0.22465978568579456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W22089926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1523804,0.0069806427,0.0016428855,0.11886128,0.0012692912,0.000024549174,0.000120580866,0.00007578803,0.71864456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9491566,0.0011815693,0.0005471901,0.0059272656,0.00029589306,0.000022886277,0.00006453903,0.000049190705,0.042754855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970777,0.0009509332,0.0000592416,0.00031028865,0.00049395737,0.0011079125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983803,0.000576181,0.00015162132,0.00032592734,0.00030247768,0.0002635549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006337375,0.00016122818,0.00033737902,0.00056361326,0.003458876,0.009118491,0.0008484498,0.0022502933,0.006993771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071763075,0.00014615661,0.00022376065,0.0007269131,0.0069276895,0.003062281,0.0036767144,0.0035513479,0.0005496274],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030971853,0.000022746268,0.0011238549,0.000021700003,0.0000052825935,0.00019329258,0.0046874247,0.00014897698,0.00011708468,0.95943093,0.016729875,0.017487861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007933926,0.000030735442,0.0068461155,0.00021035374,0.000011450436,0.00013580825,0.008961999,0.00034393006,0.0003049642,0.13579576,0.84724855,0.000031036827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026063634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036942564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026063634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009535213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00792415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06918311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2230186173","doi":"10.21991/c9zt0x","title":"LAVIGNE V OPSEU: STUMBLING TOWARDS A FREEDOM FROM ASSOCIATION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Freedom of association; Degrees of freedom (physics and chemistry); Political science; Physics; Philosophy; Law; Epistemology; Human rights; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.03414039587409379,"score_gpt":0.23071425512414426,"score_spread":0.19657385925005047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2230186173","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020901049,0.0107567245,0.00417881,0.5334486,0.0063782074,0.00013981115,0.00018339838,0.00020682524,0.4238066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34700397,0.0032088426,0.0031943058,0.44394043,0.0048300014,0.0005225653,0.00015928724,0.000368225,0.19677232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96738195,0.008216525,0.0011051097,0.0035362432,0.009564398,0.010195819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98444414,0.009031108,0.0006495707,0.0018491459,0.0018187942,0.0022072243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022624064,0.0011666963,0.0023388036,0.0026891988,0.025816763,0.029925678,0.005356758,0.11617986,0.010405466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049343463,0.0020726712,0.0019499823,0.0018547077,0.034753714,0.022160616,0.022282986,0.064320624,0.002712318],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023651197,0.000026098547,0.00015743506,0.000022399467,0.000011040328,0.00015220659,0.00177729,0.00006505435,0.00011170612,0.9222796,0.07138863,0.003984994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009945504,0.00004317945,0.0011436818,0.00043515643,0.00004127984,0.0003798013,0.0024287088,0.0003085739,0.0005667394,0.38396418,0.6103978,0.0001914786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09934379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11965298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11617986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011113368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0378556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19753104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2240457575","doi":"10.21991/c93t05","title":"CANADA’S INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS OBLIGATIONS AND DISADVANTAGED MEMBERS OF SOCIETY: FINALLY INTO THE SPOTLIGHT?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Human rights; Political science; Public administration; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.018820366910343823,"score_gpt":0.26534374948808753,"score_spread":0.2465233825777437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2240457575","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038858917,0.013629408,0.00041178937,0.80173385,0.0015509624,0.00004621834,0.00069507025,0.000044494947,0.14302927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6654589,0.01613207,0.001680074,0.25559828,0.0012852646,0.000111783665,0.00047277397,0.00014163254,0.0591192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9824421,0.0014970346,0.0002501037,0.0007039208,0.0049019675,0.010204806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9829927,0.0027552478,0.00062970945,0.0003910404,0.005084532,0.0081468085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075477054,0.00075050385,0.001363123,0.0028307876,0.03594478,0.021949688,0.0038525627,0.016213624,0.020184536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016042097,0.00059238187,0.0010527094,0.004807493,0.02314015,0.010018469,0.011067823,0.015646549,0.00073748827],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000101320686,0.000110852576,0.007745602,0.00028356127,0.00008179893,0.000370906,0.022953978,0.00047455778,0.00038561205,0.6393826,0.28779858,0.040310726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000116569514,0.000034411187,0.026165096,0.0011923576,0.0001375126,0.00012894347,0.07483822,0.0004481758,0.00055170164,0.11600191,0.77998805,0.0003970882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9905338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99515593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13865235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13865235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.44010028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W22466156","doi":"10.21991/c91h3k","title":"Intergovernmental Relations, Legitimacy, and the Atlantic Accords","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Government (linguistics); Political science; Federalism; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.022181112814359208,"score_gpt":0.25546724963577555,"score_spread":0.23328613682141636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W22466156","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11732272,0.0056592487,0.0034139857,0.08321612,0.00051555986,0.00004930834,0.00023670662,0.00009324874,0.7894931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98716986,0.0009397418,0.000390733,0.0013362099,0.000084762396,0.000010081535,0.000038974697,0.000018267074,0.010011521],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99123085,0.0015742753,0.00016644502,0.000549271,0.0032172604,0.003261878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98916745,0.0032836022,0.0014322004,0.0006763462,0.0036553182,0.0017850687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062234006,0.00021057724,0.00043779763,0.0026637046,0.017182892,0.017399462,0.0011836427,0.0029689076,0.00688161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01781118,0.0002252696,0.00029249338,0.0051226597,0.029934771,0.0037176125,0.0033453146,0.00445307,0.00030940052],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005590765,0.000010391283,0.0019618904,0.000011421149,0.0000040913756,0.000027590371,0.0016825846,0.0001485246,0.00002406071,0.98894495,0.0031517968,0.0040270635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007995234,0.000020692905,0.039997187,0.00044703265,0.000054704586,0.00007085472,0.014121128,0.0017177435,0.00029930007,0.68092656,0.26218385,0.00008095167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.917052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9398834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08294803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0692492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08276784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50244045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2251567988","doi":"10.21991/c9kd3h","title":"DISTINGUISHING ZUNDEL AND KEEGSTRA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Lexicography and Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.04903300525343404,"score_gpt":0.21992122043264506,"score_spread":0.17088821517921102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2251567988","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.087751664,0.008926493,0.013403303,0.045159962,0.0015469337,0.000060410326,0.00031370745,0.00012362222,0.8427138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90289307,0.0027778337,0.0055817585,0.015583579,0.00071646326,0.0001056208,0.00024249441,0.00025318778,0.07184595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951525,0.0017226491,0.00022016559,0.00091054506,0.0010321754,0.00096187217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938222,0.0039527174,0.00027583085,0.0007962584,0.00090396707,0.00024903586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037904938,0.0002988298,0.00077875244,0.0027352455,0.0047324616,0.0073364205,0.0013379775,0.004645615,0.00863868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016647132,0.00045425745,0.00041793147,0.0020532159,0.010372625,0.015213683,0.0049329363,0.0059456388,0.0021400708],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009592246,0.0000070242513,0.00023433418,0.000013198109,0.0000023218417,0.000026839156,0.0017348407,0.000023567112,0.000041998337,0.9880278,0.0039554494,0.0059229983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002916198,0.000017471384,0.0015619693,0.00019597585,0.000020888585,0.00022605051,0.0049116025,0.00026945886,0.0005427999,0.75248104,0.23971239,0.0000312098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014725472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0308598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014725472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003285067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051047974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02927953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2252930250","doi":"10.21991/c92h3w","title":"The European Union’s Trap of Constitutional Politics: From the Convention Towards the Failure of the Treaty of Lisbon","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Ratification; European union; Political science; Treaty of Lisbon; Law; Convention; Referendum; Member state; European integration; Politics; Public administration; Member states; International trade","score_opus":0.04195058338636457,"score_gpt":0.26059772555396254,"score_spread":0.21864714216759798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2252930250","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006441415,0.05166546,0.0040318645,0.6420144,0.011877976,0.000042959942,0.00010042337,0.00019315527,0.28363234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38607708,0.024688497,0.0064273155,0.43542978,0.009562842,0.00029672254,0.00025327315,0.00084643497,0.13641803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96698916,0.01733234,0.0010719043,0.0037382143,0.0074814246,0.0033868647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881322,0.0071218074,0.0007393349,0.0012902003,0.0012155354,0.0015009817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04128529,0.0014469519,0.0012703483,0.0024251565,0.018862203,0.05057562,0.0027160805,0.031607576,0.009552214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04089828,0.0011451462,0.0010854463,0.0036951255,0.058342382,0.026540946,0.017404288,0.036861464,0.0026495103],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037165028,0.000011753194,0.00009733519,0.00006724828,0.0000057175266,0.000079401085,0.0026856905,0.0001562818,0.000034608063,0.9184497,0.06625675,0.012118379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004686435,0.000028796034,0.0004386198,0.00088160293,0.000006305761,0.00011168384,0.0027066923,0.00014476733,0.0001626997,0.15657851,0.83884937,0.00004406909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030385137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02968067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05057562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030971682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03829966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22471637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253764572","doi":"10.21991/c9dd3z","title":"HOW CAN INFRINGEMENTS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF ABORIGINAL PEOPLES BE JUSTIFIED?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Trilogy; Constitution; Bill of rights; Political science; Government (linguistics); Fishing; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.039783466332995385,"score_gpt":0.28808667613706007,"score_spread":0.24830320980406467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253764572","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07168607,0.0040230434,0.0152312685,0.24232814,0.0013112404,0.0001822189,0.0000975861,0.00006634471,0.6650741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92172956,0.0018649097,0.0062790075,0.027874436,0.0006845672,0.00022412138,0.00006019921,0.00006184541,0.04122129],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9605836,0.017009163,0.0013063503,0.0029138336,0.00914962,0.009037343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9619539,0.02164266,0.003163875,0.0041983146,0.006948173,0.002093167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04233555,0.000620997,0.0015328834,0.0020051035,0.0114085525,0.012404446,0.0033853804,0.02346358,0.010583233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08419899,0.0007554362,0.00097222155,0.0012141585,0.04922461,0.010689385,0.008509279,0.013728279,0.0014841548],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017123997,0.00003563632,0.00061377836,0.000067655325,0.0000374127,0.00020361671,0.0053903894,0.000202622,0.00028651807,0.98525846,0.0028696274,0.005017177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006907184,0.000053199103,0.0018104797,0.00043451763,0.00008591326,0.00023853761,0.008691746,0.0006402504,0.00095765287,0.8864418,0.100497745,0.00007917857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05395831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04316544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05395831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008874014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024274081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22389448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253773316","doi":"10.21991/c9wq08","title":"DEFERRING DELAY: A COMMENT ON R. V. POTVIN","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"History and advancements in chemistry","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.03946471336735245,"score_gpt":0.24927720253388924,"score_spread":0.20981248916653678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253773316","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00065854396,0.0019413081,0.00042769697,0.97071123,0.016464094,0.000030117833,0.00009078498,0.000073076175,0.009603101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004039028,0.0004946885,0.00027631564,0.98303115,0.0059940577,0.000048351903,0.00001399798,0.00004396248,0.006058462],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9770453,0.0037466844,0.0019779638,0.005530225,0.008123823,0.0035759741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9582269,0.029210864,0.0020960898,0.0021334959,0.006263712,0.0020689024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02599436,0.0017442004,0.0032835293,0.0011161567,0.012109442,0.009745667,0.011763073,0.16287957,0.0069941683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08845647,0.002291895,0.005168891,0.0017421236,0.01351627,0.011365641,0.0058042486,0.1270505,0.006730164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006704397,0.000030040503,0.0001775998,0.000106494495,0.000029875142,0.00048191598,0.000944197,0.00014231389,0.00044783918,0.05812529,0.935863,0.0035844408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015214471,0.000075914984,0.0006531985,0.00043657862,0.00009676636,0.0003307439,0.00075230486,0.00031457393,0.0009692203,0.032529797,0.9635181,0.00017067796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03145236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04088798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16287957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009889137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02286696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13747299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255017218","doi":"10.21991/c9n37j","title":"RJR-MACDONALD V. CANADA ON THE FREEDOM TO ADVERTISE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of the press; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05143440772711355,"score_gpt":0.2475788336267206,"score_spread":0.19614442589960704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255017218","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010716467,0.0036418163,0.0008938317,0.05482972,0.0006514825,0.0001871043,0.0020444563,0.00021289365,0.9268221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16137864,0.0026496793,0.0019059115,0.085329145,0.00032820503,0.0002099801,0.00079980964,0.00014649695,0.74725217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861178,0.0009061978,0.00030596886,0.00069178536,0.007141965,0.004836271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99005616,0.0028677892,0.00038095945,0.00042634032,0.004581676,0.0016871119],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004078225,0.0007864041,0.0007470477,0.0020720726,0.016863609,0.0076057543,0.003166575,0.014545686,0.023217667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011029345,0.0012060605,0.0013984172,0.002307686,0.004125831,0.0022378094,0.002424395,0.010647527,0.003916946],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012257569,0.00006925408,0.0022036508,0.00015599118,0.000036184476,0.0005659233,0.002097754,0.00033551996,0.0011854147,0.49988714,0.47992206,0.013418418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014696081,0.000055244007,0.011569316,0.0003874413,0.00011241708,0.00016245544,0.0011522644,0.00060160214,0.0008896684,0.012755568,0.97198933,0.00017780121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9860774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99428755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053597897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053597897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14986534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3888818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255134970","doi":"10.21991/c98q2f","title":"WOMEN IN THE AFTERMATH OF MEECH LAKE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Vietnamese History and Culture Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Archaeology; Environmental protection; Environmental planning","score_opus":0.039183269670866896,"score_gpt":0.2643521552144258,"score_spread":0.2251688855435589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255134970","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92861557,0.0017550903,0.000049610484,0.04192754,0.0005972784,0.00003872847,0.0001089604,0.00000836138,0.026898941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.974607,0.0008644718,0.00002537666,0.0035729245,0.00012161946,0.000037088725,0.000046899568,0.0000126928735,0.020711897],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773586,0.00043361302,0.000029837875,0.00007509788,0.00012667022,0.0015988369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978933,0.00027873027,0.0002774988,0.000030072968,0.00016638252,0.0013540228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012870769,0.00021971067,0.0004378181,0.0008025025,0.023764286,0.0055698087,0.0010973049,0.0030175908,0.013209142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033417966,0.00038359774,0.00023642575,0.0016034793,0.007097995,0.0034065004,0.0067598512,0.0053608394,0.00035451204],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017686024,0.00012576937,0.037001606,0.00012762051,0.000022981234,0.006347205,0.88381785,0.00010307729,0.0006562306,0.030656494,0.02729783,0.013666517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009789143,0.00004941426,0.03643153,0.00011122505,0.000006611668,0.0002536764,0.89064866,0.00001917358,0.00014448918,0.0007547912,0.07155107,0.000019645797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21514834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.381589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7848517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011468121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01664287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42779207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256842593","doi":"10.21991/c9mm3w","title":"GOVERNING THE CANADIAN STATE: THE CONSTITUTION IN AN ERA OF GLOBALIZATION, NEO-LIBERALISM, POPULISM, DECENTRALIZATION AND JUDICIAL ACTIVISM","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Peasant; Political science; Law; State (computer science); Charter; Limited government; Liberalism; Politics","score_opus":0.03275263109901524,"score_gpt":0.2720643479479774,"score_spread":0.23931171684896216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256842593","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04438645,0.04004724,0.0016476852,0.30502123,0.0014716692,0.000054388005,0.00030579587,0.000075738746,0.60698986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85747415,0.01650246,0.0015686481,0.017932951,0.00041133087,0.00003536062,0.00010893114,0.000063035666,0.105903104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99719703,0.0004809799,0.000037638678,0.00026486677,0.0009259229,0.0010935476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845636,0.00042292033,0.00008025813,0.00008209349,0.0006056001,0.00035274465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023508642,0.0004141629,0.00029189195,0.00185689,0.028922195,0.01036642,0.0013443802,0.0042483676,0.005452079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041980897,0.00024974038,0.00023731559,0.0036068098,0.028389474,0.003891424,0.0020600725,0.0051363595,0.00030975766],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010344585,0.00000947449,0.0004733953,0.00003397984,0.0000032814485,0.00009816774,0.0084053725,0.00021567315,0.00009873935,0.94234574,0.040670987,0.007634893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017516672,0.000013606059,0.007960481,0.00031454672,0.000015041,0.00009174264,0.025609406,0.0005741697,0.00022843902,0.100097016,0.8649814,0.000096535754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9919629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99649626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1530066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1530066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16556156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9823923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257184070","doi":"10.21991/c9x672","title":"THE QUEBEC SECESSION REFERENCE: GOODBYE TO PART V?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Political science; Regional science; Law; Geography; Politics","score_opus":0.05233258830757859,"score_gpt":0.2983534651728099,"score_spread":0.24602087686523133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257184070","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033090897,0.041460294,0.0008618194,0.56346077,0.07170452,0.00025583908,0.0026650236,0.0003304933,0.3159522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027933879,0.008176262,0.00071938033,0.2041915,0.0061332197,0.00017003843,0.0006865055,0.00030825046,0.75168115],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952141,0.00062306435,0.00021849494,0.00047390696,0.0016087709,0.0018616846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99274135,0.000999677,0.00032391312,0.00037150405,0.004460668,0.0011029659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039452775,0.0010107774,0.0015544987,0.0024915815,0.017594224,0.01132431,0.0036874427,0.026976,0.039194066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012767377,0.0010191663,0.001308999,0.0039848806,0.004527404,0.0030179338,0.0028932749,0.017137133,0.008271579],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008661013,0.000010130521,0.00014250408,0.000041929463,0.000004657958,0.00005496076,0.00026677814,0.000040363568,0.00004142216,0.009234256,0.986764,0.0033904454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014339421,0.000007612277,0.0024843023,0.0002965879,0.000013846252,0.000033584893,0.0006948556,0.00007709044,0.0000900562,0.0012643158,0.99497753,0.000045833796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97394854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9835976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06870449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06870449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11047505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4984883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257186342","doi":"10.21991/c9436h","title":"REFLECTIONS ON THE 1995 QUÉBEC REFERENDUM: PROBLEMS AND POSSIBILITIES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"New Zealand Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.14678896515668724,"score_gpt":0.25634628079990157,"score_spread":0.10955731564321433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257186342","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03760082,0.026631234,0.0008729971,0.7887618,0.006137246,0.00010413709,0.0010704404,0.000058791913,0.1387625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3611763,0.01060452,0.0017370229,0.34302902,0.0018119148,0.00022114284,0.0005041405,0.0002141835,0.28070173],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98838776,0.0020824918,0.00034474433,0.00083227566,0.0036773887,0.0046752333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98912305,0.0034548827,0.0005053485,0.0003254102,0.0051808567,0.00141045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010939814,0.00072763255,0.0011403847,0.0020471683,0.033115875,0.017295387,0.0056956066,0.01849918,0.018777313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022175418,0.001090603,0.0012316733,0.0039127897,0.0109035,0.005503584,0.004939358,0.020844482,0.001198553],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011675317,0.000064654676,0.003154548,0.00022939853,0.00006281469,0.00095966255,0.032150973,0.0009431562,0.00044653102,0.21779776,0.7215463,0.022527507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004710744,0.000017715096,0.0098460335,0.0005913124,0.000046591093,0.00013211182,0.02895862,0.0002510324,0.000405933,0.0067721703,0.9527882,0.00014323872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99441165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99604166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1846362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1846362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16487098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9457064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257398601","doi":"10.21991/c9h95m","title":"THE SILENT MAJORITY SPEAKS: RJR-MACDONALD INC. V. CANADA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.02223631377992769,"score_gpt":0.25081210476897897,"score_spread":0.2285757909890513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257398601","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03013026,0.0046548066,0.00090178824,0.20487669,0.001830435,0.00013528334,0.001373335,0.0001353574,0.7559621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.425373,0.0032474755,0.00069929555,0.14382136,0.00058852544,0.000085175954,0.0005410366,0.00013229554,0.42551187],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99311584,0.00035232183,0.00011595317,0.00042434077,0.0032441812,0.0027474503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967584,0.0005092072,0.000126914,0.00008567848,0.0018407515,0.00067897106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025404536,0.0005908092,0.00050375174,0.00084982323,0.020941835,0.0070959884,0.002551366,0.008870143,0.013286866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007226829,0.00050228235,0.00063425966,0.0013611284,0.0042354087,0.0018039854,0.002171526,0.009585593,0.0016563185],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008498581,0.000031174113,0.0032954337,0.00009601405,0.000032025735,0.00079175236,0.0054847063,0.00030154074,0.00075856264,0.28944188,0.6831533,0.016528655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001205507,0.00004284146,0.013524899,0.00034051287,0.00016269171,0.00024732828,0.011046894,0.0007783253,0.002010566,0.028415518,0.9430955,0.00021435118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98555213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9939551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051679283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051679283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18273993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3749612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257517042","doi":"10.21991/c91h26","title":"APPOINTMENTS TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Remand (court procedure); Original jurisdiction; Majority opinion; Certiorari","score_opus":0.035827875122077656,"score_gpt":0.25622851208617875,"score_spread":0.2204006369641011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257517042","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08025928,0.0046335477,0.0007526939,0.16146071,0.00914248,0.0005291047,0.0037422855,0.00029208293,0.7391877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37728456,0.0024760885,0.0009832251,0.035576917,0.0013011127,0.00012083252,0.0010628663,0.0001488728,0.58104557],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9847349,0.0007287148,0.0002876218,0.0010404651,0.004370044,0.008838216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98096,0.0016707731,0.00036459212,0.00032946537,0.008728,0.007947147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033248207,0.00043549706,0.0009525279,0.0042735515,0.049620137,0.009717544,0.0029114557,0.00964445,0.04127616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017697273,0.00088722695,0.0008218282,0.0039965217,0.0026192986,0.0014812605,0.002835307,0.011060065,0.0027640972],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012535814,0.00009444804,0.009072168,0.000095400384,0.000050363065,0.0016135414,0.004480448,0.0005089748,0.0008474456,0.12593588,0.8316814,0.025494574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005709187,0.000023338042,0.026034577,0.00016683585,0.0000463993,0.00012958812,0.0058904197,0.00059432175,0.0005310377,0.003889296,0.9625086,0.00012848784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98971456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99735236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14843497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14843497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27546012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98769474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257961456","doi":"10.21991/c9h08n","title":"ABORIGINAL SELF-DETERMINATION WITHIN CANADA: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; Political science; International law; International human rights law; Self-determination","score_opus":0.031012645982357485,"score_gpt":0.3012560663024693,"score_spread":0.27024342032011184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257961456","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3554169,0.12607738,0.0020899358,0.23843254,0.0014178937,0.00014559552,0.0011618519,0.00015079544,0.2751071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8930863,0.046848062,0.0023373368,0.015591409,0.0003359945,0.000062151674,0.0004190909,0.0000790538,0.04124053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935622,0.0005409149,0.00018767719,0.0006092153,0.0022994683,0.0028004735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98208976,0.0032378745,0.0012524328,0.00026415207,0.007815723,0.005339946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005024195,0.0003546819,0.00076944765,0.005179941,0.023691356,0.0184005,0.0031822883,0.0033271,0.010758076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010457785,0.00045036324,0.00064513285,0.012156975,0.013502729,0.0036969902,0.004724807,0.00685328,0.00028209592],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016282786,0.00022767403,0.04385404,0.0011331212,0.00011785367,0.0011771983,0.118444145,0.0014395013,0.0008937798,0.5533577,0.07019602,0.20899619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003856387,0.00006518415,0.18614252,0.0018906655,0.00013576644,0.00037577594,0.12119179,0.0012637819,0.00060067116,0.016748492,0.67126584,0.00028098456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9976184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21487048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21487048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3724274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9106389},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258654751","doi":"10.21991/c9c96r","title":"THE SOCIAL UNION FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT: HOLLOWING OUT THE STATE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agreement; Political science; State (computer science); European union; Economics; Computer science; International trade; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05950204359991424,"score_gpt":0.3295528967158161,"score_spread":0.2700508531159019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258654751","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04271715,0.0038062877,0.06518108,0.25933447,0.0034412448,0.00024610397,0.00017854891,0.00020391589,0.62489116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8786151,0.0009847301,0.017876672,0.029794276,0.0011913746,0.0005434051,0.0001001811,0.0001907012,0.07070347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9765534,0.012964858,0.000612413,0.0017699351,0.004008982,0.0040903836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990498,0.0050845016,0.00048998796,0.0014095687,0.0010858263,0.0014321103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023939673,0.0005115843,0.00096265494,0.0019823196,0.017051999,0.013588298,0.0028362547,0.021937657,0.009312428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03886624,0.000774469,0.0013504878,0.0019288512,0.03329725,0.01991872,0.012567121,0.016681857,0.0008959246],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004418561,0.0000061971114,0.000023667244,0.000003380225,8.959267e-7,0.000007642092,0.0006657223,0.00006981812,0.000023150213,0.99564385,0.0021881738,0.0013631912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027134109,0.00001642482,0.0002212617,0.00008287113,0.0000049591163,0.000015910678,0.001519633,0.000497296,0.00013559539,0.9173209,0.08012888,0.000029111037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035064317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03834298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035064317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012943791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042600326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12660658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258867067","doi":"10.21991/c93099","title":"PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT AND THE CHARTER","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Psychiatry; Medicine; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03568758503150582,"score_gpt":0.2931249830787294,"score_spread":0.2574373980472236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258867067","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017334387,0.01770509,0.012554007,0.41140667,0.008091053,0.00010240512,0.00008564367,0.00021006237,0.53251064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78684,0.0058205086,0.008165362,0.06937818,0.007402689,0.0002933769,0.00006518107,0.00016782891,0.12186685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.983781,0.010288012,0.00040331238,0.001030817,0.002628676,0.0018682015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99055934,0.0064225835,0.0006947495,0.0007272172,0.00066302536,0.0009330368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013324954,0.00036010874,0.00070707203,0.0019625542,0.014459413,0.011209202,0.0015093603,0.013258533,0.010093316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028296731,0.0005425406,0.0005631177,0.0014127144,0.03544782,0.010014057,0.006430326,0.019982127,0.0006740675],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001328363,0.00003415205,0.00007218133,0.000012466992,0.000002034088,0.000029460203,0.0009309667,0.0001121809,0.00003256776,0.9705959,0.017192649,0.010972147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007775155,0.00004674113,0.0006713062,0.00021324221,0.000009630925,0.00011816459,0.0018011705,0.000469819,0.00016318755,0.7777552,0.21862206,0.000051839204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011194972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015872912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014459413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008324906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01630579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.070469975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259456743","doi":"10.21991/c91t1x","title":"R. V. SHARPE AND THE DEFENCE OF ARTISTIC MERIT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Supreme court; Law; Pornography; Relation (database); Political science; Child pornography; Criminal code; Criminal law; Criminology; Sociology; The Internet; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04926249681537862,"score_gpt":0.29832964825374386,"score_spread":0.24906715143836525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259456743","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018279145,0.006840114,0.002745362,0.14479773,0.0013439126,0.000051249288,0.000056795023,0.00006725204,0.8258185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76769465,0.0022579078,0.0023343465,0.097696595,0.001742203,0.00012391657,0.000033853456,0.00006997234,0.12804654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894824,0.0033195855,0.00040111292,0.0012129687,0.0033630973,0.0022207634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99096525,0.0054609114,0.00052984926,0.0011914921,0.0012416518,0.00061088015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013021526,0.0003747783,0.00071772496,0.0013427979,0.00887102,0.009355448,0.0016684637,0.018340178,0.004549898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022538679,0.00050792797,0.0007751088,0.0007611339,0.01998313,0.0032623857,0.00422893,0.013819317,0.0009525034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007777806,0.0000057802067,0.00013603918,0.000013187187,0.000004538927,0.00011618683,0.0007176426,0.000065454085,0.000099803656,0.9831101,0.012565722,0.0031578233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000617794,0.00005655858,0.0013856742,0.00030440485,0.000025302452,0.00038521393,0.000978666,0.00055144046,0.0005363172,0.5527071,0.44293672,0.00007086881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03413829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.065539874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03413829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043969615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0085944235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06886524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259807456","doi":"10.21991/c9b09g","title":"Droits scolaires collectifs en concurrence ou en complémentarité : Langue et religion dans le droit constitutionnel de gestion des écoles de langue française au Canada","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01776081312055141,"score_gpt":0.2214406257598572,"score_spread":0.2036798126393058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259807456","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8171665,0.0017346271,0.0016791897,0.013828776,0.0000655326,0.000028122262,0.00010497508,0.000021582699,0.16537066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98628914,0.00031247584,0.00026577536,0.00025854906,0.0000049109963,0.0000050090653,0.000014030664,0.000007249777,0.012842844],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989208,0.00028055365,0.000017477789,0.00008934894,0.00020414704,0.00048777167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902844,0.0002287841,0.00008007958,0.000044358465,0.000264963,0.0003534532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009537057,0.00019367687,0.00018915873,0.00067129417,0.013304225,0.00503186,0.00083372905,0.0008903145,0.0056040864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001244017,0.0001659753,0.00015427083,0.001204945,0.016654048,0.0010631264,0.0029023353,0.001529099,0.00017187724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007307781,0.000036737983,0.038242094,0.0001071971,0.000023439592,0.0011258957,0.6474102,0.0006199987,0.0022763389,0.27057925,0.0066566225,0.03284909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000125468005,0.000028723036,0.10495882,0.00026941847,0.000033775716,0.00028251676,0.6485789,0.00056245475,0.0006907124,0.010339731,0.23416778,0.00007459914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9760833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9932435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054023314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054023314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.057633124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39196837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261014824","doi":"10.21991/c9g08b","title":"THE NEW ABORTION LEGISLATION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Abortion; Business; Political science; Law; Pregnancy; Biology","score_opus":0.043105327384802196,"score_gpt":0.28517399184236925,"score_spread":0.24206866445756706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261014824","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007867546,0.016264768,0.0036361248,0.29921624,0.012283024,0.00008629197,0.0002418164,0.00010622032,0.660298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17587407,0.008792948,0.0052338443,0.25045994,0.018479131,0.00032452613,0.00030848908,0.0001993222,0.54032767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98978007,0.0027938746,0.00032380363,0.0010925992,0.004934773,0.001074956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99493873,0.002393234,0.0003766321,0.0006720778,0.00093242404,0.00068691495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008576265,0.00027201168,0.00057000347,0.0013688861,0.0045021563,0.008018208,0.0012354231,0.009271499,0.015216469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017173635,0.00050428545,0.0007226122,0.0007167517,0.009443294,0.006362262,0.0031931463,0.011570888,0.0025555855],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015790649,0.000044509998,0.0001883072,0.00004908344,0.0000044776025,0.00006925189,0.0007656455,0.00006316976,0.00030552916,0.8874499,0.09333503,0.017709237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001557981,0.000012410214,0.00066390523,0.00015563128,0.0000063158714,0.00006308543,0.00019560379,0.0000870656,0.00019773537,0.05125594,0.9473335,0.00001316175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010133396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016663063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015216469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061775283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00913199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050904155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263326183","doi":"10.21991/c96h2r","title":"THE MEECH LAKE ACCORD: THE END OF THE BEGINNING--OR THE BEGINNING OF THE END?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Art, Politics, and Modernism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"End-to-end principle; Dead end; End of history; Geography; Computer science; Political science; Psychology; Law; Computer security","score_opus":0.060998031478656754,"score_gpt":0.24247234674091703,"score_spread":0.18147431526226027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263326183","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012066063,0.007686401,0.003002665,0.38517666,0.0068563437,0.000040945975,0.00020104423,0.00012018772,0.5848496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44225147,0.003570863,0.0028260553,0.15268539,0.0073492588,0.00035523748,0.00023440989,0.00047540062,0.39025193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99325824,0.0023654827,0.00014490544,0.0005577598,0.0021299224,0.0015436987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966893,0.0012102568,0.00026169064,0.00037563103,0.00063949905,0.00082360825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006168267,0.00049728365,0.0007291346,0.00080735085,0.011344838,0.022962319,0.0016572737,0.016639063,0.022427207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019028893,0.00053707336,0.00044699956,0.001103836,0.011382204,0.020467933,0.008259645,0.02098308,0.0039692186],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003235985,0.000020081903,0.00010850337,0.00001692786,0.0000017403015,0.000040351257,0.00070269866,0.00005646915,0.00007724523,0.922544,0.07213979,0.0042598094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003887386,0.000019720896,0.001138986,0.00022532734,0.0000049153045,0.00004705738,0.0021525742,0.00021804085,0.00024611576,0.39610296,0.5997532,0.000052080923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013584334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019704072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9864157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051881797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012842396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07502645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268481372","doi":"10.21991/c9238n","title":"The Bilateral Amending Formula as a Mechanism for the Entrenchment of Property Rights","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Charter; Constitution; Legislature; Property rights; Law; Political science; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021187758004127085,"score_gpt":0.28794909136173163,"score_spread":0.26676133335760455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268481372","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01733537,0.0014695337,0.12381133,0.02653649,0.0010307871,0.00045798105,0.00012529954,0.00036619828,0.82886696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6932415,0.0014049836,0.12511158,0.00880606,0.0008450246,0.0007921675,0.000113390495,0.00019042578,0.1694949],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9850846,0.0047442596,0.0006847274,0.0019037798,0.0061379913,0.0014446154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919607,0.003724296,0.000634007,0.0019569853,0.0014071662,0.00031680887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015793044,0.00054119807,0.00048333875,0.0019523379,0.0061006662,0.005800236,0.0025478508,0.007537689,0.01266018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030242976,0.00080176763,0.0007385771,0.0019687142,0.020942086,0.0090049645,0.005204048,0.009673874,0.001188589],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022988652,0.0000034239827,0.000036012774,0.0000053702415,7.2099044e-7,0.000013497284,0.0001796464,0.00007567173,0.000057608926,0.9962888,0.00088964374,0.002447267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077846744,0.00004637938,0.00053854386,0.00013120758,0.000018086786,0.0001390951,0.00023011248,0.0027096106,0.0007289876,0.8142865,0.1810473,0.000046359746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051373016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09375846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051373016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013961658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018691398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10214794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268996978","doi":"10.21991/c9d95p","title":"TWO OPTIONS FOR A SOVEREIGN QUEBEC","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"European Socioeconomic and Political Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Business; Financial system; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07290824728729946,"score_gpt":0.2480521876421851,"score_spread":0.17514394035488562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268996978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08140356,0.0018461583,0.0057401224,0.05783304,0.00072315213,0.00012356076,0.00033699622,0.000071465736,0.851922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.738636,0.00051085296,0.005468714,0.010473688,0.00013088083,0.000134456,0.00012701312,0.000047732417,0.24447069],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99662066,0.00075370586,0.0000631718,0.00035533495,0.00070610445,0.001501053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99804735,0.00037131456,0.00006142829,0.00018406665,0.00071104313,0.00062490784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027125967,0.00047339132,0.0006555973,0.0008035712,0.013630186,0.011675912,0.0017966878,0.009426405,0.028253369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054249926,0.0004447232,0.000879522,0.00077143946,0.0040799608,0.00431375,0.0035591065,0.008390215,0.0011153346],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004860791,0.0000273848,0.0005997552,0.000011619298,0.000011814077,0.0002388858,0.0007822172,0.00063839904,0.00013393202,0.9788189,0.013964698,0.0047237542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038607072,0.00011585954,0.0063078254,0.0005237728,0.00013279183,0.000541292,0.008143625,0.012732898,0.00077447813,0.36195046,0.6080965,0.00029445198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81092733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91250896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18907267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029262459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029296009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3803723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270136097","doi":"10.21991/c9wm1m","title":"SECTION 15: EQUALITY? WHERE?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Engineering and Material Science Research","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Computer science; Geometry; Geology; Mathematics; Operating system","score_opus":0.0415559010034558,"score_gpt":0.2761015101784078,"score_spread":0.23454560917495199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270136097","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00467204,0.0088725425,0.009428268,0.12525395,0.043357316,0.0026314158,0.0041487208,0.0011659317,0.8004698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05442006,0.0060599786,0.01089334,0.3992637,0.02486651,0.004678934,0.0024888504,0.0011248761,0.4962037],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9521786,0.007917707,0.0073214597,0.0060419356,0.0169129,0.009627457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9440421,0.028178336,0.0026394953,0.0053240387,0.015866641,0.0039494215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039615393,0.0018072727,0.004326721,0.003480332,0.02023845,0.022722809,0.0075412826,0.076793276,0.0747816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07429047,0.003711722,0.004735825,0.0025508795,0.011141371,0.014407049,0.011773659,0.04075815,0.06412847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015091088,0.0003932391,0.00075841823,0.0007925919,0.000049170994,0.00043213012,0.0026116327,0.00022649871,0.0019883057,0.33102974,0.63842934,0.02313807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001261314,0.000113550144,0.0026386161,0.0025264309,0.00011082513,0.00029262732,0.0013588205,0.00020308612,0.002285166,0.06383602,0.92622256,0.00028614837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032737177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036713302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.076793276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010038281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03361106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25016934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270302900","doi":"10.21991/c9dm2n","title":"R. V. HEYWOOD: OVERBREADTH IN THE LAW OR IN THE JUDGMENT?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09085970743381327,"score_gpt":0.3195633263976049,"score_spread":0.2287036189637916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270302900","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007282409,0.021458419,0.003323693,0.7431353,0.007018411,0.00006119267,0.00012992273,0.00010587534,0.21748486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16995114,0.007965496,0.0031739776,0.69655657,0.00421346,0.00018203343,0.000085407875,0.0001744432,0.117697485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9846554,0.0060814526,0.0008277174,0.0016459462,0.003907849,0.0028816622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97968125,0.014320257,0.0009293032,0.0009134175,0.002881716,0.0012740879],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020251194,0.00089021743,0.001472702,0.0014072433,0.011835858,0.012206534,0.0040320414,0.043405894,0.009021784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04728957,0.0011161552,0.0010823465,0.0015731339,0.016249608,0.014805064,0.0041269013,0.03338837,0.003690943],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061437575,0.0000431728,0.0002510228,0.00006192581,0.000014217762,0.0002074349,0.0028952416,0.00008947738,0.00026948826,0.7046609,0.2803792,0.011066583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012583053,0.000070743976,0.0012237746,0.0009562668,0.000051801442,0.00021163761,0.0045058015,0.00038636746,0.0009539228,0.4635844,0.5277481,0.00018130416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05603979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10287167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05603979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074042124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017135533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11142719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271257012","doi":"10.21991/c9qh3s","title":"MARSHALLING THE RULE OF LAW IN CANADA: OF EELS AND HONOUR","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Marshalling; Honour; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.030698061441809744,"score_gpt":0.2435154940380979,"score_spread":0.21281743259628816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271257012","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18934599,0.028676614,0.004510856,0.34012383,0.001452399,0.00013605064,0.00059854006,0.000119102886,0.43503654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8792578,0.009200483,0.0020533812,0.015704988,0.00023372995,0.000046460034,0.00013342855,0.00014330186,0.09322653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881579,0.0013220535,0.00023349632,0.0008929071,0.0035255495,0.0058681015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98550385,0.00338392,0.0005735743,0.00041268958,0.00622424,0.003901659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007413972,0.00059842574,0.0009162822,0.0036445477,0.046525314,0.024164984,0.0034668862,0.0064624823,0.00863445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02371528,0.0008524769,0.0007142662,0.0062468187,0.03325833,0.008734854,0.007217533,0.012430187,0.00041913395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006849414,0.000043838085,0.005587949,0.00012711855,0.000041816515,0.0003965808,0.049278926,0.0011652429,0.00019341182,0.81638795,0.08014747,0.046561293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043520788,0.000027117469,0.02627388,0.00073669414,0.0000896954,0.00014243621,0.09662179,0.0019299033,0.000645604,0.106905475,0.76623744,0.0003465403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9988292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2950182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2950182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.48167914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.817679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271726640","doi":"10.21991/c9jq05","title":"STARR TREK: THE UNFINISHED MISSION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Art history; Astrobiology; Physics","score_opus":0.0396551008625046,"score_gpt":0.25604179404513194,"score_spread":0.21638669318262735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271726640","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009881875,0.0065782103,0.0030986355,0.25556278,0.013170213,0.00020600995,0.0013630303,0.0005615537,0.70957774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12582593,0.0022558281,0.0034931586,0.18365575,0.0066287746,0.0005335523,0.0008552503,0.0011900576,0.6755617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98295766,0.0032743241,0.0009489632,0.0017112709,0.0066172,0.0044905413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920821,0.0032443977,0.0006101699,0.0010506201,0.0016370227,0.0013756916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018368395,0.00090362626,0.0014517875,0.0010178258,0.012689043,0.02169839,0.003887112,0.038436025,0.02870148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029580954,0.0016939379,0.0013912851,0.0014968179,0.0064030685,0.010697642,0.0070900847,0.042537745,0.010541648],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006403822,0.000060532588,0.00012398102,0.000044463482,0.000008897846,0.00013194715,0.0007116064,0.00021165723,0.0005426717,0.6970443,0.29544887,0.0056071016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000071552,0.00003802922,0.0009389295,0.00016925207,0.000014964738,0.00008485932,0.00056083663,0.00033658638,0.0004582731,0.036702823,0.9605145,0.00010948222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058982752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0779576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058982752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010880953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024610786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.117278874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274394536","doi":"10.21991/c9ss9f","title":"PARADIGMS LOST: GERMAN FEDERAL AND ELECTORAL SOLUTIONS TO CANADA'S CONSTITUTIONAL PROBLEMS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"German; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Public administration; History; Sociology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03749095629625165,"score_gpt":0.2682749322109758,"score_spread":0.23078397591472416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2274394536","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04122566,0.011479219,0.0031360122,0.63641673,0.0024326562,0.000072253824,0.0005893219,0.00012592268,0.30452222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8184824,0.0069454876,0.0039843675,0.07270199,0.0010087643,0.00013155793,0.00038054213,0.00015424896,0.09621057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98595446,0.001791892,0.00030917933,0.00088797434,0.0050067906,0.0060496633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919884,0.001482081,0.00024383867,0.00043448264,0.0037650298,0.0020862366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009656266,0.00065036723,0.00087622216,0.00408136,0.034585148,0.019265916,0.00356069,0.009839244,0.011891164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017727878,0.0006073366,0.0007719848,0.005684508,0.016401649,0.0056729116,0.0061930926,0.013390292,0.00061886554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022361493,0.000015819365,0.00040643304,0.000021906784,0.000015381425,0.00005721103,0.0017154384,0.0004983254,0.000053826196,0.9202929,0.064114645,0.0127858855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013082568,0.0000145718,0.005237258,0.00024144794,0.00006385244,0.0000980053,0.011323531,0.002104547,0.0003617653,0.34110194,0.6391862,0.00013614073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98198295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9861428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8233695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17663047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29817906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95499194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278371041","doi":"10.21991/c9g66n","title":"R.D.S. V. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN: A CASE ABOUT HOME","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Queen (butterfly); Art; Genealogy; Ancient history; Art history; History; Archaeology; Zoology; Biology","score_opus":0.047348726665429136,"score_gpt":0.24300242005912545,"score_spread":0.19565369339369632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278371041","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09774302,0.011904876,0.000862761,0.503683,0.003076542,0.000107307955,0.00008650975,0.000042940803,0.3824931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44452363,0.005383102,0.0004415434,0.3051392,0.00084658334,0.00011690622,0.00003843653,0.00005106417,0.24345946],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822193,0.00052808394,0.000042308504,0.00015937442,0.00029643596,0.00075185316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853504,0.0007597906,0.00008033007,0.00003812908,0.00014975437,0.0004369302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015426097,0.00037212737,0.00043257067,0.00037546974,0.018207388,0.003456331,0.0014978196,0.02075965,0.0073189074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036964936,0.00077312626,0.0005513765,0.0004656527,0.004641002,0.0019311917,0.003348534,0.016297616,0.001337759],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014389954,0.00026277403,0.0065104845,0.00020783868,0.00003334445,0.040028498,0.043310795,0.0006481408,0.0016495137,0.30689135,0.5834665,0.016846959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016175477,0.0001943185,0.008694201,0.0007892697,0.00005939886,0.0072596157,0.05077214,0.00054170954,0.0009811675,0.021952279,0.90848255,0.00011164191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15144867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33067998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15144867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005600657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009100547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3011343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278994497","doi":"10.21991/c92x0w","title":"Searches of Digital Devices Incident to Arrest: R v Fearon","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Warrant; Intrusiveness; Sophistication; Reasonable suspicion; Law enforcement; Officer; Computer security; Expectation of privacy; Search and seizure; Probable cause; Authorization; Internet privacy; Jury; Criminal procedure; Business; Law; Political science; Computer science; Psychology; Supreme court; Sociology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.041434210082615774,"score_gpt":0.30864666154121656,"score_spread":0.2672124514586008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278994497","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10382714,0.0049311365,0.003268979,0.4065767,0.0056756297,0.00039694028,0.00063482625,0.00048475913,0.47420382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4316084,0.0034108076,0.0016549769,0.40551105,0.0017708088,0.0002614577,0.00026311586,0.00014762692,0.15537174],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.991886,0.0010206987,0.00039701775,0.0011372413,0.002704235,0.0028548527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99548244,0.0021686826,0.00028235296,0.00026022815,0.00094766315,0.00085867714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006537639,0.0007691984,0.00075656443,0.0021180958,0.01563545,0.006023513,0.0029554823,0.017379435,0.0076754275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019333482,0.0006985099,0.0014891096,0.0012234761,0.0068191215,0.004123099,0.0048229126,0.016496258,0.0013213312],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031597362,0.00017621207,0.007683276,0.0002639239,0.00008482482,0.008250647,0.012758804,0.00033280102,0.0017535085,0.3202544,0.6086151,0.03951057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029876488,0.00034692913,0.015372464,0.0014832246,0.00049459003,0.0056520943,0.022935178,0.001354247,0.0033103123,0.06408297,0.88412166,0.0005475666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48864102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64738756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48864102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010818908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03426945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9715936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279500906","doi":"10.21991/c9c66q","title":"Revisit the Senate as it was meant to be — The Upper House was created to protect provincial interests in the federal legislative process","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; House of Representatives; Political science; Legislative process; Malaise; Law; Selection (genetic algorithm); Lower house; Public administration; Politics; Parliament; Medicine","score_opus":0.051313388239693336,"score_gpt":0.3333419000948967,"score_spread":0.2820285118552034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279500906","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.100798346,0.007610124,0.026328921,0.24050954,0.015569314,0.00035541295,0.0012936235,0.00057982595,0.6069549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8073929,0.0023350955,0.0112354765,0.03632216,0.001322134,0.00030511423,0.00038585576,0.0005783026,0.14012286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884411,0.006727994,0.0005932733,0.0009274308,0.0016654779,0.0016447329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98980916,0.0024069697,0.000440322,0.0017781188,0.0045886985,0.0009767144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013338107,0.00037861406,0.00046394384,0.0010828339,0.013527275,0.012290328,0.00092402636,0.00333316,0.008408516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02340848,0.0005003807,0.0005675412,0.0018586656,0.009425159,0.0047485065,0.004364077,0.010932454,0.0038291316],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006706285,0.000044876015,0.003451494,0.00014519862,0.00004366777,0.000360949,0.021187536,0.00034731132,0.0022567254,0.8138058,0.12502985,0.033259366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024158951,0.00004687352,0.004822671,0.00025648085,0.000027848502,0.00018862415,0.008381681,0.00029762206,0.0019484581,0.050883286,0.9330364,0.0000860119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10923495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21649528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98996085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0100391675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02681862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21719825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279999816","doi":"10.21991/c9138b","title":"Federalism Still Matters: The Securities Reference Case","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Agency (philosophy); Business; Federalism; Broker-dealer; Constitution; Accounting; Rubric; Law; Political science; Finance; Investment banking","score_opus":0.027303036752140145,"score_gpt":0.2745197194471697,"score_spread":0.24721668269502955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279999816","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12034597,0.0031570157,0.0034447622,0.07769038,0.0003669087,0.00013264432,0.00021988997,0.00006061576,0.7945818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.930258,0.0013260895,0.0008821315,0.015225942,0.00023392926,0.00007431615,0.000087953915,0.00003173203,0.051879954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867823,0.002774466,0.0002585908,0.0012783221,0.0031985145,0.00570791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945133,0.002208547,0.00037880384,0.0005990181,0.0015678396,0.00073245633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010810119,0.0004358127,0.0009852899,0.0018357446,0.03521052,0.012716696,0.0026817457,0.010923151,0.008802714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015222695,0.0005136276,0.0011571435,0.0041642208,0.02013342,0.0073320563,0.0051613585,0.010531436,0.00062109734],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008436169,0.0000099585295,0.00040224398,0.0000057997586,0.000002992569,0.00017560058,0.0014574851,0.00011557932,0.00003245723,0.99432206,0.0022484697,0.0012189769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030110695,0.00009134182,0.00892813,0.00044610308,0.00017119129,0.0005502072,0.013009548,0.002788461,0.00093674706,0.43950835,0.53310025,0.00016859011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8897852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8995915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92963165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07036833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.081926726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51056033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282543069","doi":"10.21991/c9009c","title":"BCGSEU: TURNING A PAGE IN CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS LAW","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.043553941281185574,"score_gpt":0.29173936810177226,"score_spread":0.2481854268205867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282543069","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065207058,0.010295111,0.0023192877,0.33060405,0.010357161,0.00015707544,0.0010316806,0.0006037811,0.63811123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10850971,0.0047557503,0.0047922963,0.09092524,0.0016781616,0.00019604688,0.00051000516,0.00065301644,0.78797984],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919458,0.0009343388,0.00016957967,0.00048631305,0.003646461,0.0028174832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941093,0.0018702161,0.0001111355,0.00019980349,0.0023843877,0.0013251894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054264646,0.00084443274,0.0008069694,0.003347247,0.03977395,0.023412824,0.0034280024,0.030007247,0.051845998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015794002,0.000985418,0.0009921291,0.0047242776,0.012810168,0.008504662,0.0044796555,0.014774935,0.0044921977],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009417703,0.000012607785,0.00015018356,0.000029973215,0.0000030247345,0.00014708239,0.0031633296,0.00013797215,0.00006837618,0.28465068,0.70455253,0.0070748096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013872573,0.0000044424946,0.001337642,0.00015711898,0.000009293208,0.00003600582,0.0043394854,0.00025152884,0.00015132409,0.023785416,0.9698275,0.000086418615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98778266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9931798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11748187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11748187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17623413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85239464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282792187","doi":"10.21991/c9q08h","title":"THE POST-CRITICAL FUTURE OF LEGAL THEORY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Political science; Computer science; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017374971338332195,"score_gpt":0.2732937102068024,"score_spread":0.25591873886847016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282792187","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016811198,0.05340499,0.027533267,0.61454034,0.0046731653,0.000059381557,0.00017849203,0.00008183682,0.2827174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91021055,0.015433394,0.009646994,0.031694002,0.009786048,0.00022644494,0.00009489237,0.000092907925,0.022814833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99154097,0.0056076576,0.00016499546,0.00078668626,0.001374065,0.0005255778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9448231,0.045051366,0.0012000682,0.0034252424,0.0038342387,0.0016659821],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022316717,0.0005493365,0.00092758075,0.0029466993,0.0062381895,0.010822353,0.0019232121,0.0072583198,0.007840751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02645768,0.0004612355,0.0006285477,0.001318928,0.06869407,0.024165025,0.0041607637,0.01199993,0.0007312193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051059315,0.000008135338,0.000020109941,0.000021604323,0.0000015021307,0.000009916974,0.000460903,0.00005351299,0.000010719308,0.9959955,0.0021565016,0.0012563968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005847524,0.0000025282127,0.000029899244,0.000039850587,8.207286e-7,0.000008533482,0.00020607257,0.00012868516,0.000019021638,0.98423517,0.015320222,0.000003178916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00279342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002560989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022316717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011428942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007946586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.118023455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283390812","doi":"10.21991/c9p086","title":"SOME DRAWBACKS OF THE POLITICS OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law and economics; Human rights; Constitutional economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.022393493055971218,"score_gpt":0.27631955794012036,"score_spread":0.25392606488414915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283390812","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025698826,0.008468056,0.08256254,0.55311614,0.0017605682,0.0000647548,0.00016910427,0.00017760652,0.32798237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.850762,0.0074238884,0.03799581,0.044628575,0.009605375,0.0005124994,0.00011656326,0.00040809278,0.048547193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9788703,0.012049653,0.0006513474,0.0019264113,0.005573802,0.0009284011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9418912,0.043875184,0.0017807672,0.006218927,0.0054850494,0.0007488181],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021382771,0.00048281753,0.0010071784,0.0023311768,0.0060538626,0.009879995,0.0023489045,0.009173185,0.00870679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060989648,0.0008072409,0.00096540956,0.0032068337,0.021268291,0.020715775,0.0045333505,0.014080431,0.0013057988],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007763304,0.0000059850563,0.00016131451,0.000018377274,0.0000041616836,0.00002256334,0.00034102082,0.00012553092,0.000051386523,0.9892251,0.004891058,0.005145783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013924552,0.0000039661436,0.00021987765,0.00003457698,0.0000048979964,0.00007308228,0.00030264127,0.00054070295,0.00012230927,0.97653073,0.022143649,0.000009590442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031624145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025495454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021382771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037645462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021917985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1130842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283628236","doi":"10.21991/c9z660","title":"AUCTIONEERS, FENCE-VIEWERS, POPES – AND JUDGES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Literary, Cultural, Historical Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fence (mathematics); Advertising; Art; Visual arts; History; Engineering; Business; Structural engineering","score_opus":0.041588139374570725,"score_gpt":0.20091944137368214,"score_spread":0.1593313019991114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283628236","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39555213,0.0118387705,0.0012250603,0.108558014,0.00084000826,0.000029707213,0.000094963485,0.00003563166,0.48182568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97129595,0.0009094811,0.00011062036,0.004213035,0.00027824732,0.00001390149,0.000015259327,0.000039077517,0.023124473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949917,0.002994472,0.00010778408,0.00043505657,0.0005373003,0.00093365234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910978,0.0062291548,0.00075144216,0.000307722,0.00049502123,0.0011188263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005082597,0.00020737393,0.00033041093,0.0020209998,0.014183982,0.01838562,0.0009150199,0.0044225273,0.015563463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01544743,0.00036912275,0.00015267791,0.002877583,0.023731314,0.009843027,0.0028410072,0.0055311583,0.0005382121],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063932246,0.0000489146,0.0064895884,0.000058378308,0.000013226662,0.00032716736,0.18575074,0.00005682847,0.00016720346,0.7645387,0.030770766,0.011714471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005103089,0.000042698943,0.016885227,0.00033627305,0.000023724144,0.00024647254,0.4414672,0.00023791575,0.00031794043,0.104001336,0.4363231,0.00006715194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028010162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046003535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028010162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00402226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032434203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055694222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W22851507","doi":"10.21991/c96x04","title":"Canadian Federalism in the Context of Combating Climate Change","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Jurisdiction; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Political science; Diversity (politics); Climate change; Public administration; Population; Cooperative federalism; Environmental planning; Geography; Law; Sociology; Ecology","score_opus":0.06104873466404512,"score_gpt":0.2811990999720207,"score_spread":0.22015036530797558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W22851507","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041321326,0.015542286,0.002173035,0.27686328,0.0022636582,0.0001409315,0.0010992469,0.00014218022,0.66045403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86348826,0.009255962,0.0038765357,0.02360787,0.0004664588,0.00008343457,0.00042447567,0.0000692337,0.09872777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923167,0.0010212153,0.00012683537,0.0005176712,0.0023537013,0.0036639497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958954,0.00066388515,0.00015272699,0.00017529653,0.0017863873,0.0013264364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004513249,0.00033176792,0.00045604652,0.0022321003,0.025447203,0.009638744,0.0020750111,0.0039457274,0.007938982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011120266,0.00037195891,0.00053892046,0.004013134,0.009428778,0.0019185416,0.0034032755,0.0049379217,0.00031972534],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002246136,0.000012305955,0.002199395,0.00007498646,0.000017588978,0.0002532505,0.0045727515,0.0010003417,0.00018215535,0.8883286,0.08917921,0.014156986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003774545,0.000015831669,0.016622204,0.00028517356,0.000058300557,0.00009504547,0.0061163493,0.0013066579,0.00020197277,0.06529229,0.9098629,0.000105507475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.997072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99876094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78739446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21260554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.36176905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91326594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2285245633","doi":"10.21991/c9208m","title":"A MOST POLITIC JUDGEMENT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Social Science and Policy Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; Body politic; Political science; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.09800574020272736,"score_gpt":0.3621257563324283,"score_spread":0.26412001612970093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2285245633","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003222675,0.0025658465,0.018356113,0.58626044,0.030705348,0.00014461648,0.0003238068,0.00020661036,0.35821468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31937224,0.0020629514,0.022521101,0.48402962,0.03325542,0.0004332914,0.00033005883,0.00060176465,0.13739358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9442883,0.02068234,0.002925324,0.0053797145,0.022570604,0.0041536796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9251511,0.0327817,0.003127521,0.009527304,0.020797344,0.008615045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025315082,0.00083612936,0.0018519986,0.003420462,0.009585267,0.012189114,0.0021657145,0.018146364,0.03566769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10824616,0.0007616371,0.0012357427,0.0018486591,0.019330857,0.012627118,0.005879388,0.019648476,0.01522286],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014016272,0.00007166516,0.00041500712,0.00017105001,0.00012397648,0.00016657692,0.00048377586,0.00026348242,0.0003349952,0.6695025,0.30782384,0.020503016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008517352,0.00003387403,0.00034710232,0.0001759769,0.000047681693,0.00021345417,0.00056049915,0.0003243818,0.0002554578,0.79467577,0.20323984,0.000040799212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001969102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034013807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03566769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039293165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010148421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1338805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2285386614","doi":"10.21991/c9zd3x","title":"DISHONOURABLE CONDUCT: THE CROWN IN RIGHT OF CANADA AND QUEBEC, AND THE JAMES BAY CREE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bay; Crown (dentistry); Geography; Political science; Archaeology; Medicine","score_opus":0.014753040351762356,"score_gpt":0.20456465358075182,"score_spread":0.18981161322898946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2285386614","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12491576,0.021483243,0.0012661222,0.3756736,0.0016670201,0.00010558342,0.00060408073,0.00005504381,0.47422963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8236889,0.0037723307,0.00062151725,0.033657264,0.00027589474,0.00008134111,0.00011077053,0.00007170104,0.13772017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99042493,0.0016970239,0.00016411493,0.00084550504,0.001836981,0.0050313966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99136305,0.0024734933,0.00039463694,0.00035027871,0.0021057571,0.003312796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060398453,0.0005974196,0.0009783021,0.0020111976,0.068741955,0.027601993,0.003659391,0.014981097,0.013034482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011466559,0.0008540237,0.00069602695,0.0036732857,0.05204314,0.008331089,0.008635797,0.017107408,0.0004708289],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037574955,0.00003397688,0.002286977,0.000036733425,0.000015421276,0.00023095553,0.05181044,0.0001962743,0.00012424019,0.869227,0.066933714,0.00906663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006769099,0.000026345793,0.024667148,0.00063792773,0.000058426456,0.00013748177,0.15552175,0.00044259912,0.00028903945,0.0894817,0.7283617,0.0003082636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99734604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20052874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20052874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3128095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92727333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2288065579","doi":"10.21991/c9s94q","title":"SYMPOSIUM REPORT: AFTER ALLAIRE AND BELANGER-CAMPEAU","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Linguistic Variation and Morphology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Cartography; Geography","score_opus":0.025806703176138243,"score_gpt":0.2708752864471211,"score_spread":0.24506858327098285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2288065579","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000819491,0.052760467,0.00060946745,0.35579884,0.54004335,0.00018759462,0.00085208414,0.00015656966,0.048772097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012188454,0.021571398,0.0009140489,0.05873076,0.16743879,0.00022439759,0.0006939157,0.0003040157,0.7379341],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754804,0.0003539823,0.00013150062,0.00051105116,0.0010221584,0.00043324186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99226296,0.00090650347,0.00032402144,0.0003369168,0.004358372,0.0018111699],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043248665,0.0011705256,0.0013565588,0.001946747,0.0057227616,0.00584391,0.0016768753,0.011721163,0.086932175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065583596,0.0005888591,0.0012636755,0.001565915,0.001458486,0.006890695,0.004703827,0.008752451,0.03112941],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024581715,0.000015985135,0.000041417625,0.000053678137,0.0000026779217,0.000018288183,0.00004563501,0.000012755282,0.00008981376,0.0010058838,0.9930402,0.00564913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070332735,0.0000145699605,0.00043536985,0.00009581663,0.0000049415603,0.000022159827,0.00019644029,0.000013296486,0.00012487744,0.0005249057,0.99854904,0.00001153476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012181159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023743814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.086932175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031509628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040276297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29081714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2291903386","doi":"10.21991/c9fm2z","title":"The Speaker’s Ruling on Afghan Detainee Documents: The Last Hurrah for Parliamentary Privilege?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; House of Commons; Privilege (computing); Afghan; Law; Servant; History; Political science; Philosophy; Parliament; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.023621247166980594,"score_gpt":0.30320217532809596,"score_spread":0.27958092816111535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2291903386","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03931029,0.004098454,0.00046494784,0.49876708,0.007119596,0.000036198348,0.00025703956,0.00007161377,0.44987476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50398093,0.0015018142,0.00041856477,0.13517763,0.002857598,0.000048640868,0.00012229677,0.00009125853,0.35580137],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974558,0.00047872297,0.00006115073,0.0002427538,0.0005069837,0.0012546035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985299,0.0006036507,0.00009691465,0.00006280039,0.00032453812,0.00038226045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021679013,0.00029130394,0.00033260207,0.000579767,0.029747553,0.0075507993,0.0009858824,0.011963955,0.013244528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007605042,0.00036673548,0.0003419055,0.00051267113,0.0059617725,0.0029156918,0.0025648824,0.013759115,0.0031428747],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063321226,0.000043384654,0.0014384731,0.000045068697,0.00001041635,0.0018333187,0.028154055,0.00004817206,0.0008444996,0.33065706,0.6211497,0.01571237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014299321,0.000024512592,0.003407013,0.00015783614,0.00000813895,0.00023476285,0.015530156,0.00007809597,0.00059546425,0.010610886,0.9692997,0.00003912061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1545637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30107906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84543633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072966516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009475307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30732805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2292747333","doi":"10.21991/c9ht0w","title":"COMMENTS: NOW WHAT?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.06318094613874002,"score_gpt":0.3042156436677809,"score_spread":0.2410346975290409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2292747333","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010047518,0.0006019827,0.0002452901,0.8714028,0.1164582,0.00029642964,0.0006785368,0.00019682622,0.009115136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0040260935,0.00061393785,0.00024813664,0.9138446,0.03808804,0.0004972793,0.00027164124,0.00008765287,0.0423226],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905179,0.0017185587,0.0013599845,0.0010016494,0.003495125,0.0019066699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9634188,0.012024554,0.0029038477,0.0008709586,0.016875047,0.0039067753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008728482,0.0016137793,0.0021173418,0.0012121403,0.007097124,0.0070592347,0.0040388447,0.044614006,0.05826893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.071253076,0.0011031333,0.0019942883,0.001276812,0.0033049863,0.0051547643,0.006492737,0.027151417,0.043094732],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004728476,0.00001362557,0.00022338837,0.00010533047,0.000008804531,0.00025831538,0.00028543948,0.000025243391,0.00018183998,0.0004622433,0.99708074,0.001307799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008641833,0.00004626037,0.0017229737,0.00046128433,0.000034237462,0.00020619064,0.0028969632,0.00016376875,0.0003447576,0.00095725415,0.9929906,0.00008926339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012003448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013274044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05826893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067059943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010350132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.194929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293311790","doi":"10.21991/c9x371","title":"SHARPE’S PERVERSE AESTHETIC","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Political Science Association; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Supreme court; Charter; Law; Pornography; Section (typography); Criminal code; Child pornography; Psychology; Political science; Criminal law; Sociology; The Internet; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.042270064181060656,"score_gpt":0.27242083274394674,"score_spread":0.23015076856288608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293311790","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025971013,0.0036500203,0.0045984397,0.018239828,0.0010386553,0.000015930695,0.000043294454,0.000068144225,0.96974856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42283052,0.0036053492,0.005163383,0.015268704,0.0016617465,0.00008961231,0.00007348644,0.00029937932,0.5510078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803895,0.00085831765,0.000043745025,0.00030125427,0.0005111928,0.0002464219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929404,0.0002633788,0.000040666066,0.0001716937,0.00014722257,0.0000829867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001770196,0.0005232221,0.00021790377,0.0010971099,0.006184494,0.0057803453,0.0007035989,0.002772542,0.016498601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003720215,0.00022892714,0.0003682123,0.0007225289,0.01754563,0.0040535755,0.0032986465,0.0050503737,0.0037417358],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032839487,0.000002499097,0.000025908388,0.00000915924,0.0000010236026,0.000038794966,0.0015685897,0.00003074307,0.00004652675,0.9657317,0.02898466,0.0035571333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038447347,0.0000075486173,0.00008920333,0.00004733615,0.0000019140869,0.00019506627,0.0009295789,0.00011350425,0.00010977355,0.23608214,0.76241255,0.0000076224333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005152486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009584366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016498601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031018266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016533729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055193305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293389147","doi":"10.21991/c9g370","title":"R. V. SHARPE AND THE PRIVATE POSSESSION OF CHILD PORNOGRAPHY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Pornography; Child pornography; Psychology; Political science; Law; The Internet; Computer science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03231158084439569,"score_gpt":0.28934889142078135,"score_spread":0.2570373105763857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293389147","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1458427,0.045349937,0.001783742,0.45386544,0.0018210425,0.00006837722,0.00016825802,0.00004630188,0.35105422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91011834,0.013915569,0.00065741356,0.023649033,0.000974985,0.00004905175,0.000025020565,0.000020347727,0.05059033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998769,0.0005654769,0.000059283204,0.00011916818,0.00024749865,0.0002394688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98832196,0.00966125,0.00063956244,0.00029405468,0.0006662077,0.00041695344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002781368,0.0001694274,0.00037461967,0.0012851108,0.0033243485,0.0033479263,0.00046751383,0.006548258,0.006295132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010571336,0.0002790909,0.00036614947,0.00037763055,0.0077923434,0.0025406254,0.0018283555,0.005003535,0.00044052248],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007372166,0.00011910738,0.008575184,0.00010641829,0.00002922233,0.0011148049,0.005877066,0.00037569518,0.00059762265,0.893611,0.05168576,0.037834346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000129985,0.00036282328,0.062808946,0.0012737735,0.00009306501,0.0033115414,0.018878575,0.00085000996,0.0015799392,0.3931683,0.51735544,0.00018758798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009453849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019889016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009453849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001303006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019075722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021059334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2295034130","doi":"10.21991/c9v662","title":"AUDITOR GENERAL LOSES BATTLE AGAINST FEDERAL CABINET","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Battle; Audit; Business; Accounting; Engineering; History; Ancient history; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.03517059634072468,"score_gpt":0.2765402653373687,"score_spread":0.24136966899664403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2295034130","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024818491,0.0018473642,0.0014154646,0.6189658,0.013523076,0.0002663394,0.00047939722,0.00091684144,0.33776718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09778382,0.000617611,0.00069663493,0.18205306,0.0029172874,0.00009011597,0.00019669891,0.00025968987,0.7153852],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9703808,0.002298624,0.001013403,0.0025945215,0.015403341,0.008309201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98355216,0.0038522475,0.0008192055,0.0009933334,0.006697705,0.0040853284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0096629625,0.00068529963,0.0012613876,0.0031229048,0.029147713,0.017677892,0.0026476674,0.036691394,0.046431065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029798904,0.0015368294,0.0015110257,0.001647682,0.004365593,0.0041797287,0.0049741114,0.032816246,0.0130233895],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001578926,0.00008221538,0.0019761052,0.000041266674,0.000028042543,0.0013601137,0.0006176866,0.00015299623,0.00096841017,0.04126953,0.9336451,0.01970057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007051761,0.00010612238,0.006200977,0.00012412952,0.00003811995,0.0005509851,0.0016363907,0.00047763885,0.0012277742,0.006334268,0.98315054,0.00008256792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.101743504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15292065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8982565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016020756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030073594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20230263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296379627","doi":"10.21991/c9836r","title":"HARM REVISITED: R. V. BUTLER","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Do no harm; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy; Psychology; Criminology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07145907377720968,"score_gpt":0.21927267654045665,"score_spread":0.14781360276324695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2296379627","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005949436,0.03439869,0.0010428836,0.91112447,0.008418458,0.00002614548,0.000059029702,0.00005449508,0.044280864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03235522,0.013842684,0.0013306711,0.8974895,0.012817832,0.00014103689,0.000039006263,0.00014176968,0.04184229],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860582,0.005586005,0.000633913,0.0024758652,0.0042287456,0.0010172758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828408,0.01219632,0.0005211883,0.0010045597,0.0026168237,0.0008203491],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018908003,0.0010015187,0.0019341672,0.0015015496,0.0071092304,0.011632358,0.0035211374,0.048551798,0.0072304737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044836484,0.00089200644,0.0013163822,0.0014818797,0.016999654,0.011574362,0.005076821,0.05295288,0.003531628],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028898876,0.000019051833,0.00008056978,0.00011067891,0.000016374443,0.00010737398,0.0006610216,0.00023894245,0.00009566521,0.46175215,0.52797407,0.008915184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057567057,0.000018734989,0.00016801408,0.00060594914,0.000020246382,0.00012236057,0.0004303688,0.0002231217,0.00015578394,0.28057218,0.7175627,0.000063104024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026118025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02174355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048551798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008312067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015312048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09999633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296797358","doi":"10.21991/c9km26","title":"SHAPING WHAT FUTURE FOR CANADA? A PROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT'S CONSTITUTIONAL PROPOSALS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.02593176546982789,"score_gpt":0.2604788609536741,"score_spread":0.23454709548384622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2296797358","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11745531,0.007327789,0.006762919,0.3115862,0.0005941594,0.00044546046,0.0021604109,0.00007166599,0.5535961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93687457,0.004045617,0.0053419075,0.012850742,0.000156002,0.00022685868,0.0004805906,0.000056030356,0.039967667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9818397,0.004809037,0.00022913756,0.0006481377,0.0067812344,0.005692687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9764138,0.0051398505,0.0006871392,0.000817885,0.013954923,0.002986525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01436679,0.000592488,0.00078725367,0.005314292,0.028297773,0.027943479,0.0029638628,0.0065365117,0.0074585606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03134559,0.00057174306,0.0011634057,0.008260414,0.014528429,0.0060936506,0.003609319,0.007996463,0.0003808725],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025072626,0.000022487733,0.0015472252,0.000033623015,0.000019930212,0.00005615768,0.0021120044,0.0020051626,0.000088529436,0.9728578,0.015528861,0.005703198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009766877,0.00005298676,0.017861333,0.00051223114,0.00014611694,0.000054973752,0.03256553,0.010913862,0.0008133661,0.5164238,0.42029276,0.00026529838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97938776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9909705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25743902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.25743902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.47144163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8612655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299663598","doi":"10.21991/c9m95j","title":"Confidence: How Much is Enough?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; House of Commons; Constitution; Prime minister; Government (linguistics); Law; Political science; Governor; Subject (documents); Subject matter; Rank (graph theory); Politics; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.08626092042084935,"score_gpt":0.3115656140083177,"score_spread":0.22530469358746838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299663598","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022669954,0.00576367,0.0013975144,0.89991295,0.0020963436,0.000019555338,0.00004944498,0.000026284035,0.06806425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82609075,0.003207131,0.00064917345,0.15363653,0.001645784,0.000037639402,0.000050477975,0.000042252093,0.014640306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866822,0.00671893,0.00037649795,0.0010315867,0.0028020637,0.0023887204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97599447,0.010938851,0.0021206466,0.0010538507,0.0040821875,0.005810017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015349873,0.00023560575,0.00069124764,0.0010016097,0.007286404,0.013492722,0.0013291909,0.0080679385,0.006525973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054302447,0.00035173522,0.00039897056,0.0010198866,0.030982263,0.015829278,0.005352121,0.015284486,0.0013141036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008186561,0.00008029781,0.0082565835,0.00029031135,0.0000733258,0.00034551867,0.03534425,0.00013379121,0.0003902329,0.7345362,0.15201986,0.06844776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004346809,0.00012554444,0.01590797,0.0010342601,0.00006191911,0.00036207403,0.04833007,0.00037880492,0.0006947377,0.40952,0.5234151,0.00012597957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033076905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027978476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033076905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009720385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012593764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0811789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2300180147","doi":"10.21991/c92946","title":"ISRAEL USHERS IN A CONSTITUTIONAL REVOLUTION: THE ISRAELI EXPERIENCE, THE CANADIAN IMPACT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.05640675291215899,"score_gpt":0.29988215736807483,"score_spread":0.24347540445591584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2300180147","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25603214,0.019979093,0.00023580246,0.26119646,0.0009443786,0.000056200613,0.00043013916,0.00003970505,0.461086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9001837,0.0101970015,0.00017980754,0.020430444,0.0002374782,0.000033011023,0.00013180215,0.00007224367,0.06853453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992288,0.0010191771,0.00009581842,0.0002988117,0.0016415644,0.004656702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936591,0.0017082464,0.0003485738,0.00016197609,0.0017701093,0.002351968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005406241,0.00036838555,0.00089053944,0.0020927826,0.074579515,0.019603878,0.0024913978,0.007969419,0.016688874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008320325,0.00048168714,0.00043840567,0.00689777,0.03288718,0.0054424433,0.0059290146,0.013926253,0.0006174451],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019139126,0.00017369991,0.008007332,0.00016105172,0.00003685019,0.0009008696,0.2875937,0.00033493078,0.00044880944,0.52947,0.13865083,0.034030523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006402807,0.000027087362,0.01425863,0.00027466385,0.000032189964,0.00018293991,0.28898084,0.00012827206,0.00023867055,0.009372438,0.68633044,0.00010976432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9928537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99718815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18491843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18491843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20139594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9453791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2300602183","doi":"10.21991/c9dh30","title":"CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM: DOES ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY FIT IN?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economics; Law and economics","score_opus":0.044482203030079895,"score_gpt":0.2805532558043787,"score_spread":0.2360710527742988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2300602183","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17851914,0.006628883,0.053332675,0.45104748,0.0011386692,0.00021208309,0.0004316624,0.00016005756,0.30852935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984835,0.0005373199,0.0017820279,0.008220509,0.00062620774,0.00005872843,0.00006056465,0.000047729805,0.003831909],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9829402,0.008682162,0.00068396894,0.0019077336,0.0027219148,0.0030640515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9430676,0.03691946,0.0079843225,0.005111789,0.0049702534,0.001946475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026255397,0.00040832933,0.0017969811,0.0024375557,0.0028695166,0.010327807,0.0019773864,0.0071990313,0.014553704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07396965,0.00053438684,0.0009398906,0.0025396913,0.022233004,0.022746189,0.003654358,0.0072763916,0.0012680612],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036859143,0.00011140182,0.0020766582,0.000051075458,0.000046442907,0.000041160616,0.00038385438,0.0006607485,0.00009031433,0.9830306,0.0031034572,0.010367455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005313173,0.000031574335,0.0046399436,0.00006805354,0.000031568496,0.000034374043,0.0008424518,0.0010925608,0.00018302017,0.98295885,0.010044108,0.000020366317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030015036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023149445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026255397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005411089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006987588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13885349},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2303853164","doi":"10.21991/c96d5v","title":"CULTURES, LANGUAGES, NATIONS: CONCEPTIONS AND MISCONCEPTIONS*","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; State (computer science); Ideal (ethics); Nation state; Globalization; Monopoly; Political science; Political economy; Immigration; Law; Sociology; Politics; Economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.033022364434418985,"score_gpt":0.30705642282833123,"score_spread":0.27403405839391226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2303853164","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032293722,0.21185622,0.011832073,0.40597737,0.010123994,0.000044210272,0.00024257196,0.00014596301,0.32748383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83590764,0.07704194,0.0060495334,0.056038734,0.008271729,0.00025355397,0.00015701225,0.00027188731,0.016007952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99037117,0.007075163,0.00037069718,0.0007297553,0.0009611811,0.00049210386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874894,0.009600831,0.00061030866,0.000908073,0.000846302,0.00054501527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009185232,0.0013100386,0.00081769325,0.004397041,0.009812819,0.018555036,0.0027818799,0.007488686,0.0031250075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012578077,0.00059637055,0.00043021265,0.0075040367,0.095383674,0.023564346,0.007711543,0.013427131,0.00091044244],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008337137,0.0000082846755,0.00016970614,0.00006259911,0.0000028126233,0.00004136858,0.019309668,0.000044830507,0.000012589684,0.9635323,0.011440449,0.0053670057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009229801,0.000011886547,0.0005138452,0.0009245999,0.0000068570694,0.00033331005,0.03616518,0.00026601861,0.00009320827,0.6812166,0.28042397,0.000035354497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009916993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006534357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018555036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007869097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033445563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057094574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2305552948","doi":"10.21991/c90w9b","title":"RIGHTS, RECOGNITION, AND RECTIFICATION: CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES IN JOHNSON V. SAND","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Rectification; Constitutional law; Law; Political science; Physics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.06385283455441237,"score_gpt":0.27573461441026664,"score_spread":0.21188177985585427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2305552948","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15189591,0.008173409,0.021241523,0.16810885,0.0023051223,0.0009695292,0.00045987483,0.00036117993,0.64648455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9234262,0.0011191024,0.0054830643,0.020335829,0.0005818182,0.00042919346,0.00008578382,0.000051386007,0.048487592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96911734,0.008974005,0.0020662565,0.0034984823,0.008537127,0.0078067505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98876625,0.007815762,0.00085870427,0.0009894692,0.0009807313,0.0005891865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02330307,0.0007383505,0.0015117927,0.0027048707,0.01565746,0.015496932,0.0044427407,0.027905768,0.0046868157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036895875,0.001151053,0.0015973108,0.0020269183,0.024256384,0.008373379,0.008230783,0.017887766,0.0005030998],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021268661,0.00003743715,0.00018165796,0.000017573568,0.000008450671,0.00016065358,0.0012176943,0.0002892956,0.0001592555,0.9895392,0.005751929,0.0026155892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003334961,0.00009912976,0.0026245988,0.00033494685,0.00016223444,0.00030715746,0.0044474797,0.0031509337,0.0028376612,0.8147858,0.17059796,0.00031864297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10854328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12615635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10854328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016218688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032904316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.215823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2311717106","doi":"10.21991/c9j668","title":"THE AFTERMATH OF MEECH LAKE: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE WESTERN ECONOMY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economy; Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.08623139865255162,"score_gpt":0.23487976149012735,"score_spread":0.1486483628375757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2311717106","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32932112,0.0045387065,0.0011056075,0.3960298,0.0018414204,0.00007043295,0.0011834337,0.00008466192,0.26582497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.916814,0.0022328764,0.00034799773,0.026567867,0.0008713329,0.00007215726,0.0002563389,0.000063767526,0.05277359],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989428,0.00013517446,0.000046180572,0.00010116377,0.00017909516,0.0005956063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847275,0.00025877473,0.00038181196,0.000076412136,0.0003804072,0.0004297673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016567885,0.00024567355,0.00041630675,0.0008159617,0.009538821,0.009439048,0.0011345386,0.006945361,0.018229943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064886813,0.0002467475,0.0005562675,0.0020999578,0.00516791,0.0066549997,0.0053756163,0.005641732,0.00063480454],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037475783,0.00011073859,0.0187427,0.00019868098,0.0000721128,0.0048980406,0.015817074,0.0015845522,0.00095620635,0.8107754,0.117389776,0.029079953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013457816,0.000089795736,0.112642385,0.0005374125,0.00012701642,0.0006351736,0.043405417,0.0012793811,0.0016015806,0.18327342,0.65605694,0.0002169099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16945443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2189437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83054554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008158787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010976978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33693618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340704067","doi":"10.21991/c91m27","title":"OLDMAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT: AN INVITATION FOR COOPERATIVE FEDERALISM","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Cooperative federalism; Environmental impact assessment; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.027136319755283404,"score_gpt":0.29656275386987574,"score_spread":0.26942643411459233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2340704067","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016021429,0.0033900712,0.015985781,0.612289,0.050241623,0.0073474147,0.0014224459,0.0023990797,0.29090315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03380913,0.00084892515,0.010417679,0.2746142,0.012573246,0.004426502,0.0005256511,0.001197784,0.6615868],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9838218,0.0030987952,0.0010479366,0.001272971,0.006105723,0.00465277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9738962,0.014802294,0.00073343224,0.0013761558,0.0032100773,0.0059819277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03702114,0.0017942266,0.0016106678,0.0014147459,0.018042007,0.010487928,0.0054262024,0.08437196,0.030203478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036568407,0.0031227325,0.0033132997,0.00079451234,0.005373822,0.0066517787,0.018013842,0.044964068,0.014123397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012259666,0.00055777596,0.00034078344,0.00012241276,0.000019897836,0.0021669045,0.0022210528,0.000431651,0.0032757733,0.040802136,0.9389242,0.011014755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011141437,0.0000744001,0.00093960395,0.00008124002,0.000011187363,0.00019293978,0.00067467574,0.00036892694,0.0004002715,0.0050984854,0.99197453,0.00007223073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030105539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07794309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96989447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008852382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033517983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19578886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344545063","doi":"10.21991/c93q1h","title":"Penser le Canada dans un monde désenchanté : réflexions sur le fédéralisme, le nationalisme et la différence autochtone","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01439108694950075,"score_gpt":0.227652992891085,"score_spread":0.21326190594158426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344545063","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.074598916,0.028042847,0.004442832,0.23812355,0.0011479707,0.000029089133,0.000281244,0.00007511998,0.65325844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8981227,0.0067044264,0.0014291417,0.0077563715,0.00015321131,0.000020017054,0.000057091078,0.00006455166,0.08569243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973808,0.0006888381,0.000029974311,0.0002713619,0.0007747304,0.00085428247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862206,0.00041388962,0.00010039099,0.00010410598,0.0003750851,0.00038450013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020938343,0.00035919488,0.00038235934,0.0017416701,0.02558306,0.013205519,0.0012786601,0.003913264,0.010074771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038125631,0.00023370581,0.00029616457,0.0030330543,0.0401403,0.005891862,0.0039007007,0.0046033626,0.0004896431],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010782731,0.0000039048073,0.00040435957,0.000021791231,0.0000031549976,0.000071841794,0.015615782,0.00008389487,0.00006729497,0.96909297,0.010303757,0.0043204534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002602155,0.000011357549,0.0046526995,0.00035165297,0.000020235977,0.000110934205,0.056058936,0.00040774603,0.00031516704,0.2954156,0.642566,0.000063668864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95026016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.979392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9139881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08601191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1127748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.624063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344958328","doi":"10.21991/c90109","title":"Envisaging Canada in a Disenchanted World: Reflections on Federalism, Nationalism, and Distinctive Indigenous Identity","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Nationalism; Federalism; Indigenous; Identity (music); Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Politics; Art; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.020232931162352624,"score_gpt":0.2829396780795774,"score_spread":0.26270674691722473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344958328","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21439038,0.008070015,0.0029002214,0.25997198,0.00079205,0.00007058363,0.00018241513,0.000052697233,0.51356965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9632426,0.0016711951,0.0007441916,0.006052558,0.000047952646,0.000017944143,0.000025563138,0.00002342394,0.028174482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970163,0.0006389065,0.000042028274,0.00020061358,0.0006115186,0.0014906559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865085,0.00040778978,0.00007182345,0.000049583494,0.00035727228,0.00046275053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022027118,0.0002952179,0.00030520748,0.001425723,0.04192194,0.012572305,0.001845966,0.0042884704,0.005499658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029325946,0.00022925956,0.00039341295,0.0023292634,0.035416886,0.00454158,0.005389588,0.0062615564,0.00019303012],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011549404,0.000011267754,0.00093306584,0.000024706093,0.000003891686,0.00035576586,0.084927976,0.0002322713,0.00010933729,0.9001196,0.009500649,0.0037698855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027560392,0.000016911203,0.005160369,0.0002559871,0.000027831518,0.00021306581,0.349153,0.0010755671,0.00036203707,0.1611542,0.48243546,0.00011804724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9916551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99585426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15188536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15188536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19652817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98369277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2361072528","doi":"10.21991/c9v67f","title":"Comparing Canadian and Colombian Approaches to the Duty to Consult Indigenous Communities on International Treaties","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Duty; Political science; International law; Geography; International trade; Law; Business; Ecology","score_opus":0.09881601237805424,"score_gpt":0.2712490961845066,"score_spread":0.17243308380645236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2361072528","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12601823,0.006163619,0.00071211386,0.0088594975,0.0002271995,0.00014160798,0.0006361973,0.000032826254,0.85720867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95371467,0.004782103,0.0010604471,0.003384076,0.00006553821,0.000120951896,0.00039506546,0.000042551786,0.036434624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898031,0.0011299652,0.00022360841,0.0006496566,0.003999131,0.004194572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99489355,0.00090879406,0.0003203119,0.00024043895,0.0029333478,0.000703545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032088736,0.00049370877,0.00051723205,0.004856657,0.014882274,0.010207537,0.001834432,0.0018344449,0.012427905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013904079,0.00032208717,0.00050782383,0.007606669,0.007008645,0.0019722043,0.0037948505,0.0032204292,0.00047713515],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029105486,0.000089290326,0.028616006,0.0006089405,0.000095520765,0.00080744555,0.054518346,0.0012331811,0.0007367752,0.8274128,0.038474996,0.047115732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000087899345,0.00007702576,0.19383657,0.0010129254,0.00020858391,0.00036715862,0.13753244,0.0010681216,0.0006827864,0.012342133,0.65250593,0.0002784682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98665386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9945379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13461293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13461293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.076528475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97668976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2387780781","doi":"10.21991/c9qh45","title":"Distant Echoes: Discussing Judicial Activism at Canadian and American Supreme Court Nomination Hearings","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nomination; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Judicial activism; Supreme Court Decisions; Judicial review","score_opus":0.01779949315408676,"score_gpt":0.26522840769486056,"score_spread":0.2474289145407738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2387780781","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.325674,0.008790035,0.0011790927,0.28131998,0.005077818,0.00008284501,0.0004963287,0.00007600248,0.37730393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94037473,0.0018317093,0.0003445008,0.03160026,0.00077845494,0.000025466488,0.00008874076,0.000053053438,0.024903085],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860282,0.0028269512,0.0002525939,0.00094991707,0.0054314644,0.0045108707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9749053,0.014140715,0.0008791091,0.00035166187,0.006347118,0.0033761328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009833198,0.00051233335,0.00045272845,0.004340535,0.06250958,0.01572273,0.0032661902,0.008504774,0.007362933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027782476,0.00041209452,0.0004892293,0.0066188253,0.015372435,0.0036535575,0.003989486,0.00914583,0.0003619627],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011343689,0.000061824314,0.013183678,0.00023707414,0.00003247741,0.002017786,0.69233763,0.00023419499,0.0011575386,0.12279054,0.1428482,0.024985636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011025811,0.000028458797,0.021776732,0.00029655115,0.000031097818,0.00012281445,0.5305049,0.00014299281,0.00044557906,0.0022526102,0.44425848,0.00012879512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9748043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9925811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11272696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11272696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07709781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8178952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528615719","doi":"10.21991/c92q2k","title":"Kahkewistahaw First Nation v Taypotat – Whither Section 25 of the Charter?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Section (typography); Charter; Law; Plea; Jurisprudence; Respondent; Political science; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Sociology; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.0325850467279558,"score_gpt":0.2637665648854747,"score_spread":0.23118151815751886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528615719","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1519422,0.007298451,0.0043028025,0.30239362,0.003492327,0.00014933378,0.00036675914,0.00010366643,0.5299508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8079262,0.0015109116,0.0018558321,0.10991988,0.00037993808,0.00006313821,0.00009710046,0.00004791937,0.07819908],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99352574,0.00087974704,0.00019859041,0.00074608816,0.001697564,0.0029522923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967415,0.0013712809,0.00022171975,0.00016475949,0.0009610024,0.0005397842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005493592,0.00022381934,0.00035148166,0.0007050547,0.014350385,0.010108154,0.0020315014,0.008228588,0.0032681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010811858,0.00032741102,0.00053317804,0.00090690056,0.009323282,0.0027620909,0.002032837,0.008121696,0.00046990035],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027842423,0.000020563848,0.002496062,0.000037521353,0.000013506051,0.00074161537,0.011342117,0.00015769218,0.0005053696,0.9137734,0.06313846,0.0077458015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004721366,0.000067141846,0.015349464,0.00040727705,0.00009313707,0.0005302599,0.03669728,0.0008586504,0.0023751163,0.12899452,0.81434494,0.00023496123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.74243975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8716579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25756025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024292842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04283623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51815414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2549769496","doi":"10.21991/c9f09d","title":"Symposium Summary: The State of Canada's Constitutional Democracy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Constitution; State (computer science); Public service; Constitutional law; Political science; Corporate governance; Liberal democracy; Law; Service (business); Rule of law; Public administration; Sociology; Management; Politics","score_opus":0.013421334471025649,"score_gpt":0.24380214807491726,"score_spread":0.23038081360389162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2549769496","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059900936,0.04363809,0.00084179395,0.555153,0.19587699,0.000756852,0.006625499,0.0003439424,0.19077376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07310284,0.03123741,0.0015085993,0.07776393,0.044252332,0.0005234464,0.005375856,0.00021958604,0.76601607],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980294,0.00010447812,0.000060392147,0.0002492161,0.0010089336,0.00054754625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954295,0.00027545716,0.00007447143,0.000105110616,0.0023936017,0.0017217955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024546178,0.000782083,0.00064374943,0.0019098605,0.011147083,0.009042005,0.0019831934,0.0075998395,0.055529766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037808674,0.00041711112,0.00063812046,0.0022301609,0.0018289846,0.0018536804,0.0024118526,0.005120803,0.005833785],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016921418,0.000009387171,0.00016064441,0.0001235275,0.000002804185,0.00005510994,0.0002581839,0.000041235544,0.00017919797,0.002609808,0.99019086,0.0063523683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007159304,0.0000066926177,0.0014657038,0.00011917799,0.0000042356432,0.000024287638,0.0006370074,0.00003885275,0.000077169985,0.00041658085,0.9971903,0.000012783536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.79110676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9003109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20889324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038943548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.102954894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4202469},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2550987653","doi":"10.21991/c95h3t","title":"Judicial Review of Ministerial Advice to the Crown","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Advice (programming); Confusion; Nothing; Law; Action (physics); Power (physics); Political science; Politics; Sovereignty; Legal advice; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.025708336971098103,"score_gpt":0.3016147067215856,"score_spread":0.2759063697504875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2550987653","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03304788,0.03599381,0.0024361988,0.33550397,0.010893827,0.00034607042,0.0012140607,0.00024638433,0.58031785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58582044,0.015608246,0.003048892,0.09937933,0.005030144,0.00023623335,0.00059541606,0.00020183362,0.2900795],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9739603,0.0044225273,0.001259435,0.0020301822,0.013245453,0.00508213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9557525,0.015654739,0.0013329126,0.0021645264,0.023076177,0.0020191448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019580618,0.00038191638,0.00087151345,0.0028675827,0.012191978,0.009083406,0.0036708799,0.012086883,0.006855523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09182412,0.00067073165,0.00049509405,0.0036790525,0.0064210654,0.0019604557,0.0021381583,0.011472966,0.0014437985],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003465967,0.000028341112,0.0008824787,0.00019031407,0.000028057633,0.00041072766,0.003523039,0.00022362596,0.00041473852,0.47684705,0.49613717,0.021279784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035531026,0.000017467939,0.003995762,0.00035651334,0.000042720712,0.00007328862,0.0016860208,0.0004918913,0.0006271557,0.024709135,0.9679092,0.000055331224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.53143746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67888606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53143746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034514975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.087931335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.942644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2551230042","doi":"10.21991/c9s96g","title":"Accessible Information and Constitutional Democracy: Who Counts?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Legislature; Government (linguistics); Democracy; Public administration; Political science; Population; Diversity (politics); Public policy; Separation of powers; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.015732386423645044,"score_gpt":0.2744195894122916,"score_spread":0.25868720298864656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2551230042","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020149598,0.020659944,0.020941366,0.44119295,0.0021246981,0.000101643614,0.0005464256,0.00023375168,0.49404958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.938299,0.011807183,0.006649615,0.01761873,0.002669672,0.00015107435,0.00029568403,0.00023119965,0.022277856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9679242,0.018542476,0.0009740899,0.0024334942,0.0060433643,0.0040824385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9604826,0.023282224,0.0021165365,0.003571916,0.006382037,0.0041647414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021638993,0.00053431484,0.0013044626,0.006153441,0.013869653,0.033890467,0.0023141417,0.0051167724,0.011329682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054914568,0.0004949105,0.00046262427,0.009899021,0.07644598,0.04396821,0.009995114,0.0064160475,0.0013207193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073909023,0.000009112866,0.0005475035,0.00005271198,0.000004121471,0.000015206161,0.005669864,0.000059013284,0.000013503825,0.9687206,0.010798719,0.0141022215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012670128,0.000009459309,0.0010093505,0.0004640907,0.00001009466,0.000024108613,0.00999841,0.00023418794,0.00006502848,0.8577591,0.13038862,0.000024801846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.123094894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10161896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.123094894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023713198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028200293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24475682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2551431252","doi":"10.21991/c9nh35","title":"Legislative Vehicles and Formalized Charter Review","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Parliament; Constitutionality; Charter; Legislature; Political science; Law; Compliance (psychology); Public administration; Constitution; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.027164514875267373,"score_gpt":0.29288565910362424,"score_spread":0.26572114422835685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2551431252","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12956011,0.07490031,0.16267402,0.26591846,0.006663612,0.0048579765,0.0030005586,0.0019009954,0.350524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84392834,0.020673173,0.07687224,0.01584285,0.0012491466,0.0016748612,0.0016265908,0.00040240484,0.037730437],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.84250885,0.07960243,0.013655542,0.010668458,0.044387206,0.009177541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6659234,0.1609111,0.027699202,0.03588795,0.10246247,0.0071158707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12864003,0.0003552052,0.0012066764,0.012814281,0.009200156,0.017571054,0.0048975446,0.003993422,0.00361695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25818852,0.0011409259,0.00065590197,0.011993019,0.014731763,0.007930157,0.0063485247,0.0053243735,0.000724018],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006622551,0.00006811992,0.0042280853,0.0009985456,0.00006353522,0.00036232756,0.022294097,0.0013402492,0.0008814798,0.76710504,0.04614952,0.1564428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010430284,0.00013273646,0.013149447,0.0048127905,0.00013474873,0.00022595645,0.0109937545,0.0024728638,0.0028953017,0.11435798,0.85043263,0.00028742224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24921326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40518734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24921326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046814308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1667377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6803216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2552659060","doi":"10.21991/c9d101","title":"A Recent History of Government Responses to Constitutional Litigation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Constitution; Settlement (finance); Political science; Witness; Power (physics); Law; Politics; Constitutional right; Constitutional law; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.036030059284368705,"score_gpt":0.27597178288593255,"score_spread":0.23994172360156385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2552659060","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06278431,0.10427242,0.0016297296,0.15651225,0.0031766219,0.000058329304,0.00023432424,0.00008488111,0.67124724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80502605,0.06842496,0.00093003496,0.05417734,0.0024929112,0.000061242084,0.00020572335,0.000096511016,0.06858518],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934337,0.002696473,0.00020587424,0.00063394685,0.0014337163,0.0015963706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879233,0.007994669,0.0010615371,0.0005923877,0.001634149,0.00079391204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004892911,0.00024146405,0.00033335536,0.0034446483,0.012628325,0.010259908,0.0010491457,0.006194971,0.008976198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013041735,0.00026892347,0.000268975,0.008143956,0.015866151,0.0040043364,0.0030170972,0.005806247,0.000886973],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079116006,0.0000648398,0.0051134485,0.00062284304,0.00002965303,0.0011400824,0.10579782,0.00021532887,0.00048177197,0.661844,0.10089432,0.12371681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025447375,0.000013156245,0.004060057,0.00028667436,0.0000050140047,0.00015786297,0.017326185,0.000032515007,0.00016464255,0.0060772747,0.9718602,0.000013954875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13278595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2825906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13278595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020513287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011219776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2640261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2553437117","doi":"10.21991/c9895f","title":"Political Accountability in Appointments to the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Legislature; Politics; Law; Accountability; Reputation; Supreme Court Decisions","score_opus":0.024116853473701298,"score_gpt":0.2826322086586384,"score_spread":0.2585153551849371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2553437117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5313331,0.0011434387,0.0013857549,0.06976156,0.00083087594,0.00022968781,0.0006318355,0.00012545008,0.39455837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9715826,0.00016195072,0.00022960504,0.0020001782,0.00008361884,0.000019644078,0.000049367543,0.00002051291,0.02585259],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9800577,0.0027639682,0.00039253742,0.0014111347,0.0053168284,0.010057792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97552866,0.008316491,0.002191792,0.0006375061,0.0076023554,0.005723199],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008526297,0.00018963475,0.000481092,0.0023228896,0.027713263,0.0105902115,0.0017950023,0.0035928732,0.012609119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045026787,0.00045115687,0.00032144022,0.0032247014,0.0059257695,0.001551369,0.003842166,0.0055795494,0.00054897397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029824377,0.00020858433,0.087838404,0.00015861067,0.00011656734,0.0026333733,0.08883688,0.0025079583,0.0020119098,0.6076775,0.13913985,0.06857211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012020484,0.000113229224,0.31672448,0.00031527007,0.00013801373,0.00022202106,0.08093617,0.0060159992,0.0024090647,0.04232847,0.5503427,0.00033439754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9785971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.991905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8821004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11789958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15056245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85542536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2554226502","doi":"10.21991/c99964","title":"Renovating Canada's Constitutional Architecture: An Examination of the Government's Democratic Reform Initiatives","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Democracy; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Legislation; Political science; Voting; Electoral reform; Reform Act; Prime minister; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.015038857211804698,"score_gpt":0.24975281042046035,"score_spread":0.23471395320865565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2554226502","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35743034,0.0062278407,0.0015025937,0.124381274,0.0005095858,0.0005283484,0.0008860642,0.00009433233,0.50843954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94642437,0.0021417406,0.0012554069,0.0068473537,0.000049370814,0.0000731977,0.00025326872,0.000042944983,0.042912245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98062813,0.0020883137,0.0002531055,0.0007056129,0.00845488,0.0078699775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98874015,0.001962278,0.00042236858,0.00044658134,0.0060266727,0.002402031],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0106342435,0.00033690332,0.0005034625,0.003893785,0.039506614,0.022301449,0.0027611507,0.003048542,0.0045862794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01784258,0.00043933504,0.00053185073,0.00796491,0.016429596,0.0029522185,0.004051757,0.0054435018,0.0002055095],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008573694,0.00008906511,0.022053722,0.0002038608,0.00005794782,0.0004508096,0.059825238,0.0013689785,0.00067191006,0.79332596,0.057051547,0.06481519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007349212,0.00007157659,0.124417536,0.00045309903,0.000112272195,0.00009572519,0.09210267,0.0015119052,0.0010409731,0.020357069,0.7596153,0.0001484031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9958169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99847776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6483305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.3516695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.473187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7519715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2554928324","doi":"10.21991/c9ht18","title":"A Project to Reduce Canadians' Constitutional Illiteracy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); House of Commons; Constitution; Opposition (politics); Political science; Democracy; Law; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Citizenship; Parliament; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.030062421665450312,"score_gpt":0.30633203005157505,"score_spread":0.27626960838612474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2554928324","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1921759,0.0016914567,0.0121057285,0.14426482,0.0018835188,0.0014344609,0.0028214455,0.0017653822,0.64185745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6024828,0.001359271,0.020522952,0.025550228,0.0002875529,0.0009325038,0.0019813504,0.0004899708,0.34639338],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99573874,0.000602708,0.00006252817,0.00037726742,0.0017682371,0.0014504466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989003,0.00074364466,0.00021667314,0.0006109021,0.0053427396,0.0040830774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036247754,0.0004981542,0.0002788385,0.0019907097,0.015458458,0.0042415187,0.0020302576,0.0014741023,0.021223968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012887359,0.00023049835,0.00058630086,0.0018920305,0.003717973,0.0015056762,0.004500753,0.0022719835,0.001874461],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020307995,0.00033052024,0.018764738,0.00026936585,0.00003437567,0.0003972815,0.031713504,0.00080570707,0.002977776,0.22700866,0.48960578,0.2278892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000115959454,0.0000869009,0.024095917,0.00016178147,0.000057522244,0.00010795146,0.020423498,0.00086094515,0.0012844548,0.0061354106,0.946607,0.000062729756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9822618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9869645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058434688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.058434688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2683465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4239753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2555081054","doi":"10.21991/c91t29","title":"The Committee Process: Platform for Participation or Political Theatre?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Legislature; Parliament; Politics; Government (linguistics); Lawmaking; Legislation; Constitution; Political science; Public administration; Democracy; Legislative process; Legislative assembly; Commons; Law","score_opus":0.04173499695155266,"score_gpt":0.3386259006441732,"score_spread":0.29689090369262056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2555081054","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032868844,0.0024732384,0.04161765,0.15675846,0.008870143,0.00034086322,0.0002691337,0.0006864854,0.75611526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8516549,0.0013098656,0.011580108,0.01611402,0.0026886824,0.000597349,0.00024829363,0.0008920286,0.11491481],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96257496,0.025328606,0.000787758,0.0021016798,0.0044159684,0.004791087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9736821,0.009158081,0.0020949244,0.0038307803,0.00287903,0.008355113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021407412,0.0006929798,0.00056399085,0.0015511748,0.017223848,0.025217153,0.0028134289,0.006048537,0.035059378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04726618,0.00054626004,0.00084804726,0.0020453394,0.01996693,0.019904863,0.012910338,0.007927153,0.009029362],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012073499,0.00009023501,0.0014567386,0.0001678575,0.000019334057,0.00019515275,0.04528999,0.00017761167,0.0005843975,0.8154364,0.09620323,0.040258322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056202003,0.00007771306,0.0013452781,0.00036017442,0.000016890037,0.00012230831,0.032908186,0.00039662793,0.00057775,0.0978407,0.866238,0.00006014766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008528825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011334874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035059378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062435516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01263253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11728525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2555579280","doi":"10.21991/c9x09r","title":"Accessing with Dinosaurs: Protecting Access to Government Information in the Cretaceous Period of Canadian Democracy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Period (music); Legitimacy; Status quo; Accountability; Politics; Political science; Government (linguistics); Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.01890384342914863,"score_gpt":0.24789843338108172,"score_spread":0.2289945899519331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2555579280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5767975,0.0036992615,0.0026147284,0.053724542,0.00031206626,0.00016332502,0.000626087,0.00009594701,0.36196652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97112346,0.0008626915,0.0011970433,0.003754349,0.000023424234,0.00002704624,0.00011286949,0.000024494015,0.02287473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951834,0.00059580785,0.00009824939,0.0004035956,0.0014101736,0.002308696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924354,0.0017261382,0.0004987611,0.00076264935,0.0028010332,0.0017759781],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00419519,0.0002355954,0.00030345327,0.002094276,0.03839488,0.010342458,0.0021333466,0.0029339904,0.0058802967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013134671,0.00031852417,0.00028163317,0.0034039353,0.018419404,0.0029125647,0.00542427,0.0035725336,0.00032126773],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016687559,0.00005265381,0.034830518,0.00014834142,0.000030029689,0.0016710326,0.3935919,0.0005066621,0.002373461,0.43583205,0.043234155,0.087562345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026795298,0.000038869654,0.07340526,0.00036970497,0.000047320944,0.00038587753,0.17593019,0.00042651242,0.0012843217,0.019983765,0.7279476,0.00015375532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99391913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99653506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8816347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.118365295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1775715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85880435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2561793365","doi":"10.21991/c96h34","title":"The SCC Reimagines Freedom of Association in 2015","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trilogy; Freedom of association; Supreme court; Legislation; Charter; Collective bargaining; Corollary; Political science; Law; Association (psychology); Wage; Human rights; History; Psychology; Art history","score_opus":0.012945675346835462,"score_gpt":0.2734341127043858,"score_spread":0.26048843735755034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2561793365","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057132185,0.006603198,0.0090156,0.15462631,0.0069497842,0.00048435666,0.0015030978,0.00028261545,0.7634029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57738274,0.0029087758,0.0065575503,0.10334058,0.001014498,0.0003080474,0.00092332246,0.00019746851,0.30736706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96651524,0.0018011002,0.0012329767,0.0032554048,0.017468227,0.009727096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877666,0.0032117357,0.00048486333,0.00095335755,0.0057134675,0.0018698209],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015317772,0.0007651151,0.0010438096,0.0028393096,0.021370651,0.01920162,0.0039481306,0.018185757,0.004899281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02608179,0.0010928113,0.001710528,0.0028063597,0.027951479,0.0045188977,0.0084133595,0.020437477,0.00083592505],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013853192,0.000013651562,0.0007365439,0.000036771657,0.000009497165,0.00014579369,0.004325968,0.00041097225,0.00022589951,0.94916755,0.038505647,0.006407791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003502333,0.00004015544,0.0048460155,0.00041876064,0.000041210853,0.00008559462,0.003925516,0.00056103204,0.0008442394,0.054673165,0.9343405,0.00018880349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9778356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.980372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17464715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17464715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28975967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9572923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2562854184","doi":"10.21991/c9z08p","title":"Daniels v Canada: Supreme Court Ends 150 Years of Political Football","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Constitution; Parliament; Politics; Plaintiff; Settlement (finance); Interpretation (philosophy); Political question; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.025839907581089023,"score_gpt":0.27802250632928044,"score_spread":0.25218259874819143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2562854184","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10985085,0.0066034254,0.0011365187,0.09320146,0.0019901625,0.00017378687,0.0020162466,0.00016354704,0.7848639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57456535,0.0029465402,0.00092455815,0.07232399,0.0004999401,0.00009604645,0.0006177782,0.000091896814,0.34793383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98961407,0.00046152473,0.00017790656,0.0009910547,0.0043143113,0.0044411393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957098,0.0010610615,0.00011297576,0.00019216798,0.0019080429,0.001015862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037493797,0.00047959198,0.00063682365,0.0018298642,0.041662667,0.011433518,0.0027813294,0.010813087,0.009421957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010826789,0.0007172402,0.0006917801,0.002301278,0.0063219657,0.0018539018,0.003389023,0.009583393,0.00087688526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014453988,0.0000511609,0.006903703,0.00011363029,0.000055412533,0.0026094185,0.01241381,0.0005883335,0.001152428,0.64903855,0.30659732,0.020331662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009355484,0.00006321067,0.015893633,0.00046181944,0.00010857851,0.00038679896,0.012196192,0.000856729,0.0019286147,0.029640375,0.9381163,0.0002541884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98471594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9954372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.084343895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.084343895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1521507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61196065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2562886473","doi":"10.21991/c9b685","title":"The Supreme Court's New Labour Trilogy: Momentous Decisions and a Modest Critique","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Trilogy; Charter; Law; Political science; Freedom of association; Labour law; Sociology; Law and economics; History; Human rights","score_opus":0.02328326040981284,"score_gpt":0.29737446268251577,"score_spread":0.27409120227270295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2562886473","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006138006,0.0051996144,0.009858209,0.8737022,0.0072309976,0.000021510356,0.00007847912,0.00005946794,0.09771152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59798145,0.0047610938,0.008963918,0.31591344,0.028806323,0.0003587681,0.000102796665,0.00030113503,0.042811103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.974462,0.012590544,0.0009384459,0.002815986,0.007802649,0.0013903817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.978741,0.015816456,0.000756563,0.0014665055,0.0024066414,0.0008128127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025055975,0.00056134176,0.0010413383,0.002707917,0.0138163995,0.017436087,0.005446988,0.022838024,0.0034637162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047132753,0.0006199917,0.001206534,0.0025893939,0.06376327,0.014435228,0.0062088515,0.040881246,0.00078216166],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030394885,0.000004633407,0.000026644659,0.0000075885505,0.0000014140328,0.000013694477,0.00094309996,0.00005642864,0.000014201663,0.98856926,0.009367367,0.000992665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021677359,0.000010147153,0.00012952411,0.00014799158,0.000007431679,0.000027973829,0.0014727775,0.00051027624,0.00009308582,0.8465957,0.15095861,0.00002473999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021849383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021503827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025055975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0130998995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012004602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13251024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2563272628","doi":"10.21991/c9t96s","title":"Trial Lawyers of British Columbia v British Columbia: Section 96 Comes to the Access to Civil Justice Debate","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Charter; Supreme court; Political science; Constitution; Economic Justice; Autonomy; Habeas corpus; Sociology","score_opus":0.034974618822124756,"score_gpt":0.30304966708798214,"score_spread":0.2680750482658574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2563272628","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04306893,0.022828462,0.00069986685,0.48167643,0.002907968,0.0000932814,0.00061056507,0.00008724452,0.44802728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.469829,0.007902912,0.00064070785,0.28208816,0.0011513866,0.00012623375,0.0002467427,0.00012407346,0.2378908],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900776,0.0011501447,0.00037565178,0.0011388122,0.0035204699,0.0037372436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855843,0.00755919,0.0003628257,0.00041377672,0.0032195735,0.0028602306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007861477,0.00044231548,0.00068668206,0.00196233,0.025664888,0.017269583,0.0033562086,0.023378441,0.017909627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02266013,0.0010135391,0.00045993223,0.003073064,0.011593935,0.003792596,0.0029913962,0.018388528,0.0014761674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014871123,0.000082449376,0.007299711,0.0003162492,0.000042238444,0.0019067194,0.011281585,0.00029361036,0.00097235455,0.37962815,0.5494037,0.048624415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001115856,0.000042094878,0.019832054,0.0013042239,0.0000990464,0.00022042007,0.010380632,0.00041022518,0.0006829872,0.031662438,0.9350584,0.00019587338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9726934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99092734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07676072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07676072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15106164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55694056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2563691799","doi":"10.21991/c9ph3g","title":"Constitutional Obligation of Alberta to Publish Laws in French: R v Caron and Boutet","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Alberta","keywords":"Obligation; Publication; Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.027321183109563607,"score_gpt":0.29933305565125085,"score_spread":0.27201187254168724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2563691799","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.121960774,0.007154417,0.0024400086,0.1292588,0.001266117,0.00018278924,0.000437952,0.00017653649,0.73712254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77137583,0.0014359263,0.0017522073,0.036321037,0.0005016205,0.000106839165,0.000105633124,0.000046601584,0.18835422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898303,0.001425023,0.00026587656,0.0009322812,0.0041715894,0.0033749698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99177563,0.0044766753,0.0003470495,0.00051839167,0.0020581398,0.000824125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077489675,0.0003338346,0.00053698994,0.0011885088,0.016543329,0.011995844,0.0022231298,0.014611173,0.0050408705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016764216,0.0006577715,0.00047826488,0.0015416471,0.0087715015,0.0022031204,0.003582397,0.006847123,0.00044395274],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053585976,0.000018199953,0.0015618185,0.00004899996,0.000017045324,0.0011426231,0.007139992,0.0003423338,0.00072146783,0.94672114,0.03463442,0.0075984527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009954942,0.0000670735,0.0072321557,0.0002798306,0.00009421518,0.00069513824,0.0067451233,0.00096340996,0.0018124463,0.04612509,0.93566746,0.00021846437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9076919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9270954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.092308104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040131383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08652226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29117495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2566452130","doi":"10.21991/c9g09q","title":"Trinity Western Law School: \"To Be or Not to Be -- That Is the Question\"","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Law; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Nova scotia; Balance (ability); Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.08022226476180438,"score_gpt":0.35196583245039137,"score_spread":0.271743567688587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2566452130","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033363525,0.004680174,0.0013763872,0.525854,0.003584494,0.000035376688,0.00011513319,0.000066543165,0.43092427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6097651,0.001571849,0.001150219,0.13213125,0.00061799533,0.000065042244,0.00009381352,0.00009744184,0.2545073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99591523,0.0013855529,0.000102151986,0.00055778516,0.00080275,0.0012365332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967841,0.0007257137,0.00019062537,0.00017331,0.00089522445,0.0012310358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003858302,0.00021881756,0.0002790739,0.00063426176,0.016284319,0.0084426,0.000870406,0.0055977097,0.012525378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071676867,0.00024192793,0.00016734784,0.00075980264,0.025579382,0.0047307415,0.003182532,0.00813491,0.0023473005],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014569902,0.000013360266,0.0021591028,0.000056484645,0.0000049836185,0.0001701273,0.03546139,0.00001994944,0.00013728197,0.7008062,0.24688451,0.014272086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008221007,0.000014417149,0.004077888,0.00030327824,0.000008223156,0.00014101717,0.048890017,0.00006389916,0.00021701476,0.0698072,0.8764337,0.000034999866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38743767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.646982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6125623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01614173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023415528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77036506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592745997","doi":"10.21991/c9w383","title":"Reforming Rowbotham: Towards Fairer Financial Eligibility Standards for State-Funded Counsel in Criminal Trials","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Position (finance); State (computer science); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Accounting; Business; Economics; Finance; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.08090724780616793,"score_gpt":0.3228051050623508,"score_spread":0.24189785725618285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592745997","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13385575,0.004301904,0.13369659,0.34861183,0.002746818,0.00073918846,0.0003176946,0.0005097757,0.3752204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85849845,0.000900425,0.04629414,0.05772154,0.00082928303,0.0007033246,0.00007176135,0.00008915824,0.03489189],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95092815,0.026377248,0.0023650704,0.005451058,0.009765098,0.005113356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94667435,0.03690604,0.004218713,0.004423988,0.005428602,0.0023482277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06450986,0.00072353525,0.0011156842,0.0027544457,0.006950539,0.022282574,0.0051977593,0.02205901,0.007102818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16723384,0.0010594871,0.000928495,0.0016988767,0.0142770605,0.017651217,0.012016943,0.021159919,0.0014729896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025171988,0.000027077527,0.0005498079,0.000033429747,0.000008848697,0.00008392032,0.0011637623,0.00047649883,0.00015341135,0.98050517,0.0070881452,0.009884718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018727638,0.00016870289,0.0020432859,0.0006008186,0.00007339305,0.00018082751,0.0017726913,0.006226086,0.0014869737,0.89126503,0.09584325,0.00015158541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015567971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035676647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06450986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009714291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027751042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34116483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593491886","doi":"10.21991/c94h4w","title":"The Incremental Evolution of National Receivership Law and the Elusive Search for Federal Purpose","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Constitutionality; Supreme court; Law; Receivership; Legislation; Political science; Ultra vires; Statute of limitations; Bankruptcy; Doctrine","score_opus":0.03989411658067844,"score_gpt":0.3321334183834593,"score_spread":0.29223930180278085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593491886","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11864482,0.0030075437,0.010021446,0.113658935,0.0003293787,0.000040740215,0.00019064595,0.00014266974,0.75396377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9533925,0.00065421074,0.0029660268,0.0062483987,0.0001162146,0.000020089667,0.000051700656,0.00003994378,0.036510896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946163,0.0006867984,0.00014928136,0.0010027904,0.0019728513,0.0015720103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942595,0.0016853395,0.00043936732,0.0006044908,0.0022781873,0.00073315337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006269813,0.00015312083,0.00033004227,0.0020587447,0.012155962,0.012144755,0.0012836502,0.004398588,0.003916239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011375836,0.00037784624,0.0003628724,0.0018677749,0.039383344,0.00501202,0.0032504052,0.006140833,0.00037284786],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004344198,0.0000038143323,0.00057395065,0.0000049811033,0.0000014428064,0.000025724767,0.001947589,0.000073387106,0.000062020306,0.98963696,0.0027717594,0.0048940866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026585265,0.000029546722,0.013794015,0.00020524535,0.00003909492,0.00025032312,0.0059952717,0.0015724541,0.00086927984,0.475286,0.5018519,0.00008034283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7389589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8422832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7389589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07852274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.066896185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56972504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599328721","doi":"10.21991/c90t1m","title":"Reference Re Supreme Court Act: Atlantic Canada and Regional Considerations in Supreme Court of Canada Appointments","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Charter; Governor; Legitimacy; Original jurisdiction; Institution; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.04681979287507785,"score_gpt":0.2817716530001664,"score_spread":0.23495186012508854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599328721","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027916169,0.01075463,0.0015598518,0.16385096,0.0018922401,0.000099018536,0.0014137531,0.000090748734,0.7924227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66438097,0.0037774786,0.0020032653,0.06459057,0.0008706465,0.000104699255,0.0004162995,0.00011040963,0.2637457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99159676,0.001153816,0.00021743705,0.0007162119,0.0030490372,0.0032668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931004,0.0019935882,0.00021993445,0.00022385751,0.0030957025,0.0013664359],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003974961,0.00046956586,0.00047105603,0.0019598298,0.03140564,0.012105841,0.0034417605,0.0132850595,0.015860507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011756422,0.0005468563,0.00069003494,0.00285999,0.009782352,0.0030201164,0.0024415152,0.008821902,0.0012635111],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021342128,0.000015844113,0.0021051657,0.000029871522,0.00001613967,0.00035037776,0.0038268748,0.0003128715,0.00014295145,0.8322762,0.15536699,0.005535318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054777927,0.000025276415,0.020805655,0.00056963,0.000103620354,0.00017281501,0.009723089,0.0013097511,0.00037058754,0.082938656,0.88372344,0.00020271442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9908303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10377962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10377962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14087377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7529774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2635172517","doi":"10.21991/c9mq0s","title":"About Howard Leeson","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geology; Physics","score_opus":0.049261984048057345,"score_gpt":0.2382913969243983,"score_spread":0.18902941287634095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2635172517","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003984653,0.0303292,0.0007260538,0.48277023,0.28335276,0.000028731378,0.0010277951,0.0005535744,0.20081316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007847972,0.021700794,0.00056078314,0.13057174,0.07030101,0.00004653511,0.00067964214,0.0006033304,0.7676882],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948394,0.00008433153,0.000017168366,0.000112977155,0.00025225218,0.000049346138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975829,0.00076323847,0.00012262241,0.000089430236,0.00096428295,0.00047750722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080568774,0.0003954952,0.00048851303,0.00085694273,0.001594672,0.0028529465,0.0008502837,0.0024187313,0.1663331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008832427,0.00022841604,0.00025347833,0.0006602247,0.00048803806,0.0033662205,0.0013167716,0.004530887,0.08893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027616468,0.0000021548333,0.0000216544,0.000014050435,4.781722e-7,0.000007653082,0.000014196561,0.000004081815,0.000008760506,0.00082148047,0.9933211,0.005781609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001279074,0.000001594868,0.00007732427,0.00003595295,0.0000010072183,0.00003461686,0.000053258096,0.000011891707,0.000027172067,0.00043105154,0.9993222,0.000002771054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033348317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053856247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1663331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010005769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014622952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55643964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2635700455","doi":"10.21991/c92m3x","title":"Les leçons de Jordan, III : à quelles conditions est-il légitime de déroger aux droits constitutionnels fondamentaux?","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.05378333636103678,"score_gpt":0.3759383895990287,"score_spread":0.32215505323799193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2635700455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23691915,0.015094933,0.007843406,0.1851175,0.00078065594,0.00009222799,0.00023688986,0.000055314867,0.55385983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8541178,0.0027971312,0.0018894688,0.012603164,0.0002976073,0.00008829978,0.000068146415,0.00005393823,0.12808448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777883,0.0011798883,0.00007243137,0.00024282548,0.00041090875,0.00031507734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99732274,0.0011817977,0.0003162377,0.00019060819,0.0007612332,0.00022734907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006893009,0.00026229082,0.00029357232,0.0007671093,0.009360762,0.00943673,0.0010448607,0.0037715018,0.008654935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072017377,0.00017523153,0.00018136413,0.001124367,0.015691662,0.0062270677,0.003093719,0.0036772054,0.0010519535],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005506469,0.000017765651,0.0012725425,0.00006374173,0.000005513339,0.00019253221,0.026803227,0.00012573409,0.00027884077,0.9506609,0.0117616,0.008762442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061159764,0.00007042374,0.005672609,0.00057582563,0.000014932005,0.00023556278,0.10420236,0.0006518392,0.0023839294,0.25220233,0.63387454,0.000054437416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03029887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045314725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9697011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072458787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010863687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060244977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2638979055","doi":"10.21991/c97954","title":"Round One: Saskatchewan — Canada Negotiations 1980","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Negotiation; Political science; Period (music); Law; Economic history; Public administration; History; Art","score_opus":0.018487019026777265,"score_gpt":0.24543781780730284,"score_spread":0.22695079878052557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2638979055","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41618475,0.0066677327,0.00072880794,0.056712992,0.0022397104,0.0015231264,0.01296181,0.00013900273,0.50284207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39761937,0.0036466375,0.0009887215,0.028140703,0.00015048988,0.0009107652,0.0038570939,0.000086357766,0.5645999],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972734,0.00016723655,0.000054688393,0.00020111263,0.0008268257,0.0014767128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99706227,0.00048508492,0.00011551109,0.00008256291,0.0010159515,0.0012385495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015415965,0.00056005886,0.0005919732,0.0020940816,0.022908887,0.007544584,0.001702135,0.0039974465,0.020041578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003881802,0.0007532042,0.0004611342,0.004923709,0.002552001,0.0015087533,0.003990047,0.0060943724,0.002112023],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001945137,0.0005323673,0.04175356,0.00081103627,0.00027036163,0.0058962717,0.031729456,0.0023815776,0.008625465,0.13546993,0.6994755,0.07110929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030331517,0.00016805537,0.16640896,0.00037873667,0.00007333574,0.00017504684,0.058015086,0.00041866675,0.0021475668,0.0044921595,0.7671768,0.00024231312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99248004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99906033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1770112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1770112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2779314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9545503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2643550004","doi":"10.21991/c9zt19","title":"The Beginning of the End of the Gang of Eight: June 4, 1981","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Council of Ministers; Political science; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Economic Justice; Sign (mathematics); Law","score_opus":0.014201487922866343,"score_gpt":0.24613694172947417,"score_spread":0.23193545380660782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2643550004","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07353977,0.0075144456,0.00052729854,0.07596685,0.008820919,0.00025704832,0.0010468533,0.00007815657,0.8322487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19685057,0.00175639,0.0002867557,0.008134902,0.00049995276,0.000078001154,0.00039737512,0.000083168896,0.79191285],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962501,0.00041770123,0.000070015165,0.0002568178,0.0009563009,0.0020490184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99811137,0.00022732974,0.00009557599,0.00008990427,0.00043855494,0.001037286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00265531,0.00037715025,0.00036746674,0.0012810237,0.036109608,0.006893022,0.0013514349,0.0042416253,0.01901443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053413147,0.0005420106,0.00027348378,0.0014651874,0.010211454,0.003100839,0.006276041,0.008727306,0.0032266546],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029153188,0.00006996786,0.0035193355,0.00012918514,0.000008844878,0.0013258333,0.08664053,0.00010467939,0.0006997716,0.38077724,0.50725585,0.019177264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048144357,0.00000933073,0.0025298342,0.000041911535,0.0000011896169,0.000038057526,0.007994236,0.0000051238594,0.00010239308,0.001110198,0.9881517,0.000011207751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6589044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9044211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34109563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03887964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029181616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6862088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2651126847","doi":"10.21991/c9q95g","title":"Annotated Notes: NDP Leaders Meeting - February 18, 1981","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Democracy; Political science; Computer science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.06260484733694399,"score_gpt":0.3343377906131046,"score_spread":0.2717329432761606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2651126847","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021859715,0.004866629,0.0007408832,0.021684457,0.04799635,0.00058821664,0.075555936,0.00059043244,0.84579104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0024005983,0.00089394994,0.00031225002,0.00061495765,0.0007933931,0.00010529312,0.008829346,0.0001485235,0.9859016],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890506,0.000100799014,0.00004680192,0.00008682543,0.0007122248,0.00014826136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99725634,0.00046570663,0.00011300759,0.00012773895,0.0017729716,0.00026416229],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010310678,0.000651924,0.00044160048,0.0028646446,0.004502317,0.0025705292,0.0011442346,0.0011283106,0.2898998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047755395,0.0004143098,0.00017238819,0.0049030297,0.00055021787,0.0010595663,0.0012154811,0.0018498534,0.11879716],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012027079,0.000002365778,0.000017533592,0.000017948243,1.6327135e-7,0.000016280228,0.00008152934,0.000009088305,0.000027508975,0.00032561453,0.99692947,0.0025603995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025439447,0.0000017188781,0.0006597626,0.000032183038,2.9212998e-7,0.0000057774178,0.00022943536,0.000005924785,0.000039095456,0.00010349237,0.9989166,0.000003255204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22844633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4131003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2898998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009463186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075772377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96981144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2656835543","doi":"10.21991/c96966","title":"Les leçons de Jordan, II : l’article 33 de la Charte canadienne ne permet pas de suspendre la répartition fédérative des compétences","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05619664453501023,"score_gpt":0.33656291197268334,"score_spread":0.2803662674376731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2656835543","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07206705,0.007942101,0.003077941,0.057549402,0.0013231843,0.00010452152,0.00034062358,0.00007624813,0.85751885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5218822,0.0027512324,0.002226544,0.008295256,0.0003513928,0.00011286647,0.00018225083,0.00008116539,0.46411717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886763,0.0002836597,0.000036402296,0.0001623522,0.00039476634,0.0002552496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871266,0.0002879562,0.00012991326,0.00008759074,0.00055810483,0.0002237542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017946246,0.00035279544,0.00017895339,0.00088961626,0.008175014,0.0074424986,0.0006254382,0.001924168,0.010813551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035222517,0.00016481569,0.00015671465,0.0013746127,0.0075079617,0.0022615832,0.0015951762,0.0039311685,0.0016826815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007499214,0.000032313907,0.004342539,0.00009488966,0.0000071849126,0.0003296567,0.04657345,0.00020935269,0.0003825863,0.8221405,0.08980419,0.03600827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012937484,0.000021544682,0.00607756,0.00015584205,0.0000048433644,0.00011513428,0.01640727,0.00014483182,0.00063389266,0.017942628,0.9584594,0.000024098039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19649187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33768222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80350816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013734988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022636015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3906963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W26748574","doi":"10.21991/c9nd4h","title":"WHATEVER BECAME OF THE WESTMINSTER MODEL?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Algebraic and Geometric Analysis","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.07064091124810265,"score_gpt":0.26554403757883394,"score_spread":0.19490312633073129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W26748574","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055242736,0.0058283675,0.026693579,0.1131421,0.0017554809,0.000034983397,0.00018093112,0.00007165371,0.7970501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8502387,0.0023904638,0.0042632166,0.010927055,0.0007175127,0.00007121747,0.000072747025,0.00012940858,0.13118982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865144,0.0005824228,0.00003162309,0.00028417743,0.00022273987,0.00022761441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943906,0.0001894942,0.000058249072,0.00014613652,0.00009392872,0.00007316194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018591231,0.00035850448,0.0005858662,0.0008695323,0.0027385356,0.0053925,0.0006476075,0.003105676,0.012083183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003336436,0.0003042911,0.00033350603,0.00082128646,0.011318892,0.016614933,0.0019166532,0.0055529657,0.0013048527],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018912406,0.0000011537373,0.000011654046,0.0000017190506,4.200078e-7,0.000002477256,0.000119779936,0.000019864267,0.000009224579,0.99865294,0.00070034066,0.0004784586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048433685,0.0000033864508,0.000083278086,0.000019450395,0.0000023306077,0.0000126135,0.000410945,0.00020395848,0.00007801556,0.9575265,0.041648593,0.0000060180087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011425204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008514821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012083183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004606825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002126527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04042226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2692741836","doi":"10.21991/c93m4m","title":"NDP Negotiations on Patriation: Calgary, February 1981","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Opposition (politics); Political science; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Law; Politics","score_opus":0.02261727169332378,"score_gpt":0.27271253458603323,"score_spread":0.25009526289270945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2692741836","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031841304,0.020230152,0.0006295301,0.072679296,0.003872454,0.0004101391,0.0009688209,0.000082523715,0.8692858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.172424,0.0051394296,0.00040551563,0.018274713,0.00044347963,0.0001925144,0.0002813053,0.00006983377,0.8027692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939674,0.0005431679,0.00020290355,0.00051402574,0.0020580243,0.0027144852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970385,0.0011762595,0.00016065844,0.0001762115,0.000830152,0.00061811804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00380004,0.0006702339,0.00062670646,0.0016838105,0.031091183,0.011837119,0.002468747,0.009890674,0.025612429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012949848,0.0012907812,0.0004183747,0.0037701945,0.009888139,0.0031834745,0.005609858,0.013911541,0.0032987124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021855008,0.000092419,0.0024999795,0.00016378622,0.00002543671,0.0023528489,0.027141683,0.00068225904,0.00095027307,0.54182565,0.3908933,0.033153765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027223963,0.000012217693,0.0067227706,0.00012488721,0.0000060306184,0.000045911944,0.0047022803,0.00006245174,0.00028219476,0.0058712144,0.9821133,0.000029456509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90236354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9705146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10461671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10461671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.089996405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7590509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2695559067","doi":"10.21991/c9ft21","title":"Was the Supreme Court right to change the law on the right to a speedy trial?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excuse; Supreme court; Law; Charter; Political science; Set (abstract data type); Computer science","score_opus":0.09176488806049153,"score_gpt":0.34214430239926347,"score_spread":0.2503794143387719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2695559067","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021604007,0.0044026226,0.01004119,0.77111566,0.0056412253,0.00006286942,0.00020141041,0.00011593735,0.18681505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57290024,0.0019094922,0.004516549,0.35241303,0.004283099,0.00014010277,0.00012182582,0.00017692265,0.06353873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98689497,0.0026171866,0.0006014123,0.0024290045,0.0038677037,0.0035898671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837462,0.009498713,0.000838855,0.0011615622,0.0033201317,0.0014346882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019931158,0.00030565678,0.00068271335,0.00077134796,0.00919405,0.014114185,0.0028181376,0.026325257,0.0062938733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06714773,0.0006380837,0.0008999595,0.0007473984,0.023719465,0.013753454,0.0037719412,0.031179653,0.0012830299],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025247775,0.000011600245,0.00030168783,0.000012243703,0.000007260826,0.000096724914,0.0008136875,0.00009169922,0.00010152772,0.9696516,0.02373719,0.00514952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012506093,0.000058459853,0.0010855254,0.0002534459,0.000034423785,0.0001888173,0.0013129911,0.00058445777,0.0006279802,0.62643856,0.36918324,0.00010708062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.095969066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.068312824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.095969066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011816761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021642739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19082093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2706279283","doi":"10.21991/c9v38s","title":"Four Lenses of Patriation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Historical Gender and Feminism Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lens (geology); Political science; Sociology; Optics; Physics","score_opus":0.06964321082579006,"score_gpt":0.3282604594837448,"score_spread":0.25861724865795477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2706279283","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08394588,0.008304938,0.03878822,0.1827335,0.0010371286,0.00013736603,0.00011389532,0.00020183549,0.68473715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9804268,0.001043913,0.0038300625,0.0025752229,0.000233462,0.00009914293,0.000024128016,0.00009477677,0.011672388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9675692,0.023954568,0.0005205967,0.0013493306,0.0041225837,0.002483731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9806065,0.011985092,0.0014311243,0.0022801138,0.0024801416,0.0012170782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019564651,0.00087085355,0.0007112436,0.0059708473,0.014866247,0.02543372,0.0020738996,0.0051842458,0.0062154257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023850588,0.0006854002,0.0007549976,0.004876774,0.12989591,0.026562342,0.017558927,0.013984953,0.00060380547],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010289463,0.0000058532173,0.00019074116,0.00002462631,0.0000022386282,0.000056991863,0.032555237,0.000037691243,0.000039556326,0.9635948,0.0011099884,0.0023720402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016134418,0.000022252145,0.0005179054,0.0002551288,0.000006625462,0.00012970669,0.052744817,0.0003450296,0.00028903678,0.825548,0.12009752,0.000027791239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063723293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049764365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99362767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017734049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010201584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12867016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2714097908","doi":"10.21991/c9km3k","title":"Annotated Notes: Gang of Eight Ministers of Intergovernmental Affairs Meeting June 4, 1981 — Winnipeg","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plan (archaeology); Public administration; Political science; Government (linguistics); Order (exchange); Law; History; Library science; Operations research; Engineering; Computer science; Business; Archaeology","score_opus":0.016847099873960526,"score_gpt":0.258967915321376,"score_spread":0.24212081544741546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2714097908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013031575,0.0069995327,0.0014248921,0.06233638,0.03004241,0.0016974318,0.11676556,0.0006674833,0.76703477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.032935973,0.0016517523,0.00095772196,0.0029874563,0.00076617836,0.00039799217,0.014530674,0.00043602017,0.94533616],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990816,0.00011716984,0.000042285938,0.00011473505,0.00042815006,0.00021604127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968816,0.0006052031,0.00015748703,0.0001618731,0.0017397323,0.0004540588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010457106,0.0006087472,0.00027254748,0.0019224444,0.0075074295,0.0020154917,0.0011727643,0.0009406736,0.1389035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007686204,0.0005053602,0.00012814045,0.003593816,0.0006370136,0.00091074436,0.0013363021,0.0015487308,0.027635826],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020868438,0.0000031821946,0.000113894836,0.00003364741,3.1610958e-7,0.000036137742,0.0011336018,0.000009216727,0.00008355929,0.0010419473,0.9928934,0.004630267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028867146,0.0000017477312,0.0015619905,0.000026818663,4.4943533e-7,0.0000073631786,0.0012680775,0.0000062322297,0.000053296335,0.00007131437,0.99699533,0.000004614285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.74568164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84428763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25431836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012615038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013611454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51163214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2718497283","doi":"10.21991/c9b37r","title":"Les leçons de Jordan, I : quelles sont les voies de recours extraordinaires contre un arrêt de la Cour suprême?","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Political science","score_opus":0.03809130245330594,"score_gpt":0.3435488994852651,"score_spread":0.3054575970319592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2718497283","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14729922,0.024721539,0.0041454523,0.3087048,0.0018093593,0.000071590934,0.00050139386,0.000078573736,0.512668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6335735,0.0077927737,0.0022079924,0.046851616,0.0009746891,0.0000792259,0.00024226958,0.00009903645,0.30817887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821365,0.00059035997,0.00006064352,0.0002757678,0.00051831274,0.00034116878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99786574,0.00050970266,0.00027182777,0.00010343399,0.0009120221,0.0003372849],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003851668,0.00030006227,0.00029837235,0.0007597625,0.009739746,0.010713753,0.0010232306,0.003440361,0.012976383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072428402,0.00020467056,0.00023686123,0.0010188844,0.00985173,0.005022189,0.0027441748,0.005420559,0.0019123644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017954384,0.00003849844,0.009646104,0.00019383845,0.000032959717,0.00068055355,0.034922577,0.00030806023,0.000819272,0.77934945,0.12404645,0.04978272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027894446,0.000048206934,0.0110860355,0.00055243255,0.000016427099,0.00020753534,0.047954835,0.00041341406,0.0015358957,0.064980745,0.8731065,0.00007014215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11796996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25986224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11796996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010405977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014471935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23456657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2764654819","doi":"10.21991/c93q04","title":"NELLES V. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF ONTARIO ET AL.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Queen (butterfly); Art; Ancient history; Geography; History; Archaeology; Biology; Zoology","score_opus":0.03713018147208178,"score_gpt":0.2856270832470552,"score_spread":0.24849690177497344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2764654819","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015754694,0.0060383026,0.0004031882,0.08635001,0.0013740386,0.00016442627,0.0017714474,0.0000691082,0.8880748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13723354,0.0031709399,0.00056380243,0.06834188,0.00032948115,0.0001722443,0.0005172306,0.000059039652,0.78961176],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963666,0.00024504616,0.00008253853,0.00022699144,0.0016445168,0.001434152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99725,0.0005907597,0.00012887095,0.00009967553,0.001209577,0.0007210268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020362902,0.00040698354,0.0003642248,0.00061874726,0.02167847,0.004215338,0.001265484,0.008180881,0.015569712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005005632,0.0007280188,0.0005115553,0.0008804981,0.002898102,0.0014258499,0.0016571388,0.0048243664,0.0019851471],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009495347,0.00003345036,0.006121497,0.00013458557,0.000021169171,0.0008361913,0.0067029987,0.00011521939,0.0009768667,0.15994924,0.8169469,0.008066906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004775069,0.000016109565,0.01449879,0.0002025459,0.000034969355,0.00010365089,0.002272294,0.000104805804,0.00038127688,0.00385735,0.9784212,0.000059217145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9746104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04203472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04203472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0787278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30498463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W28088756","doi":"10.21991/c9qq2g","title":"JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE AND JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION IN THE TOBIASS CASE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial independence; Judicial discretion; Administration (probate law); Independence (probability theory); Judicial activism; Political science; Judicial review; Law; Judicial opinion; Mathematics; Politics","score_opus":0.03685082703434801,"score_gpt":0.24284116188262392,"score_spread":0.2059903348482759,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W28088756","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16504452,0.0017391369,0.007038754,0.043118082,0.0008852659,0.00010856165,0.00010857603,0.000031680705,0.78192544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9578148,0.00071016175,0.00086262287,0.0070805396,0.0007901277,0.00013309231,0.000049009013,0.00004680595,0.032512918],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98155046,0.0051173633,0.0007076074,0.0015512959,0.0033001476,0.0077731893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867404,0.0068380143,0.0014867666,0.0013871087,0.001310943,0.0022367092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013071364,0.00042491354,0.0015879945,0.0041379826,0.01587561,0.014716959,0.0019403507,0.013445898,0.009197934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029044347,0.0010818435,0.001560606,0.0037244074,0.0283453,0.0073026773,0.010099002,0.017709851,0.0010794434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016358472,0.000017374203,0.00025442417,0.0000050397653,0.0000048965644,0.00015598685,0.0006339681,0.000090069894,0.000044289944,0.9961106,0.0018334856,0.0008335198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015663847,0.000024268498,0.001857098,0.00013663346,0.00003769185,0.00026202181,0.0021522178,0.0006288841,0.00031996038,0.95145696,0.04291516,0.000052506715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030547809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04295891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030547809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012616969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06912875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809805504","doi":"10.21991/cf29358","title":"Jordan's Principle: Reconciliation and the First Nations Child","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Institutionalisation; Political science; Social needs; Economic growth; Sociology; Law; Health care; Economics","score_opus":0.021440169906610598,"score_gpt":0.294146900421974,"score_spread":0.2727067305153634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809805504","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029892871,0.008002241,0.025055712,0.14587882,0.0013308353,0.00011392908,0.00006500354,0.00008500941,0.78957564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8723006,0.0029247121,0.018293796,0.04537773,0.00094626524,0.00039146864,0.00006620561,0.000113055576,0.05958614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98114383,0.012533632,0.0005934261,0.0014528095,0.0024728174,0.0018034338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946622,0.0023325237,0.00067211536,0.0008535378,0.00090468803,0.000574945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022594763,0.00043888256,0.00073878124,0.001489811,0.016970556,0.008873905,0.0021266828,0.009787526,0.005024915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015163379,0.00031448863,0.0008075636,0.0013245442,0.06248446,0.008388565,0.012116277,0.0111773135,0.00068458164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028639654,0.0000047424373,0.00011615294,0.000008973665,0.0000020698483,0.000048880745,0.00303084,0.0000403171,0.000013398498,0.9930581,0.0019660727,0.0017075827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002347062,0.000031100994,0.00046634526,0.0002765042,0.000008345937,0.00056162884,0.006354709,0.00023714075,0.00022726704,0.7129492,0.2788297,0.0000345911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007888923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009847253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9921111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066069565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013103556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11949396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810323610","doi":"10.21991/cf29360","title":"De facto and de jure Crown Sovereignty: Reconciliation and Legitimation at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Legitimacy; Legitimation; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.0191935199108331,"score_gpt":0.2674869927135426,"score_spread":0.2482934728027095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2810323610","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09534869,0.0094855875,0.013472182,0.12479654,0.0009974665,0.00012066196,0.00038968422,0.00015596632,0.7552333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9547364,0.00147471,0.0022367693,0.0071713333,0.00024951558,0.00004773788,0.00007823507,0.000064652086,0.033940785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98195523,0.0025043685,0.00041181402,0.0019223443,0.007605533,0.0056006704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988971,0.004366795,0.00041011485,0.00089836115,0.0042517893,0.001101926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011051426,0.00036768944,0.0008389937,0.002479414,0.031987607,0.025248973,0.0035327629,0.010617015,0.004889348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026252009,0.0005916099,0.00061008334,0.0034851166,0.039771616,0.0058555985,0.0064950045,0.015101552,0.00034248587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036677498,0.0000028555642,0.00025736488,0.000005980056,0.0000052170167,0.00007037689,0.0027117913,0.0001386383,0.000045426954,0.9907864,0.0038516992,0.002120573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004553293,0.000014332533,0.004149749,0.00030086105,0.00007833844,0.00009760819,0.0075213583,0.0023490877,0.0007351755,0.69058585,0.29396772,0.00015437284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9469619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9491044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12572734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12572734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16055213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2811405627","doi":"10.21991/cf29362","title":"Wahkohtowin in Action","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Metis; Law; Commission; Work (physics); Political science; Action (physics); Sociology; Law reform; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.05231313615420984,"score_gpt":0.34114393953631045,"score_spread":0.2888308033821006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2811405627","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07365169,0.0010519633,0.009832794,0.027453063,0.00087154494,0.00035667032,0.00013638052,0.00029009537,0.8863558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63800216,0.00049887045,0.009685559,0.0047193654,0.00003374675,0.0002173661,0.00009073659,0.00010362552,0.34664854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99732697,0.0006190497,0.0000772296,0.00052854366,0.0005832724,0.0008649243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987972,0.0002193297,0.00006803595,0.00020124388,0.0002475219,0.00046676304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028057978,0.00037077768,0.00024098015,0.0007391118,0.010756279,0.005804571,0.0012053445,0.0022109214,0.020022992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035530357,0.00024041148,0.00025830523,0.00063855207,0.008945836,0.0034236736,0.0071600727,0.0028181456,0.0018349016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042430805,0.00007257729,0.0029171,0.00011826407,0.000008979026,0.0007336635,0.07276536,0.00025253618,0.0013112373,0.8044969,0.043341927,0.07393909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009821911,0.000021080743,0.0025873133,0.00018570643,0.000011827043,0.00017712645,0.043578982,0.00036872234,0.0008421268,0.0520821,0.9000953,0.000039867267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20463721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40767425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7953628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008325615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023964822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40689224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921501954","doi":"10.21991/cf29375","title":"Senate Reform and the Political Safeguards of Canadian Federalism in Québec","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Politics; Political science; New Federalism; Doctrine; Separation of powers; Law; Cooperative federalism; Dual federalism; Simple (philosophy); Public administration","score_opus":0.012292723289220937,"score_gpt":0.25036644728356877,"score_spread":0.23807372399434784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921501954","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4965571,0.005693589,0.0011011896,0.058151975,0.00037064173,0.000165712,0.002405885,0.00011972508,0.43543425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9513495,0.0010780493,0.00044586931,0.0023888333,0.000034328652,0.000031224958,0.00022556986,0.00002156517,0.044425085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968706,0.0004610506,0.000074516465,0.00019742608,0.00069872075,0.0016977135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99404573,0.0009173245,0.0003331308,0.0002534659,0.003266085,0.001184308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030878831,0.00016759503,0.00036232523,0.0016824179,0.014510362,0.005585614,0.0011905449,0.0012596732,0.013944318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00797122,0.00030830104,0.00046531882,0.0027788405,0.0037199531,0.0011888162,0.0015214266,0.002352794,0.0004099106],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043246438,0.00013409252,0.0671661,0.00018756156,0.00012819601,0.00081416743,0.01445629,0.0050259964,0.0009862811,0.7349642,0.11585815,0.05984651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002368965,0.00009001908,0.33989674,0.000397652,0.00020161978,0.00014430983,0.0151768625,0.006147151,0.001392253,0.016413955,0.6196139,0.0002886239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9986829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8019786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19802138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17511979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9301815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921517813","doi":"10.21991/cf29373","title":"What happens when the assumptions underlying our commitment to free speech no longer hold?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Free speech; Censorship; Psychology; State (computer science); Expression (computer science); Social psychology; Communication; Computer science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02943114865596558,"score_gpt":0.2668799835422001,"score_spread":0.23744883488623453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921517813","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12087079,0.0037121498,0.027097935,0.63197917,0.0039948514,0.00008327681,0.0006852284,0.00019505629,0.21138154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9605378,0.0017954903,0.004029495,0.024931196,0.0014728145,0.000114623566,0.00023723526,0.00012995962,0.006751478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98208076,0.0076673813,0.0006427097,0.002897504,0.0037787622,0.0029327788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93885696,0.03459774,0.007856934,0.0065947683,0.007893191,0.0042004515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027464539,0.00033375254,0.0008350401,0.0015905269,0.0067005586,0.015020038,0.0026345293,0.008209791,0.010581686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11076116,0.0005221718,0.000534856,0.0016076289,0.024512162,0.020639857,0.0034703773,0.014048092,0.0022225513],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002345186,0.00016427935,0.016775113,0.00019530846,0.00008880565,0.0013258386,0.030827185,0.0006673644,0.0006713896,0.8576925,0.040860344,0.050497368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039114464,0.000045569755,0.013041439,0.00033855284,0.000032354623,0.0007628493,0.039566234,0.001448449,0.0005209664,0.8826847,0.061417002,0.0001028622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014520922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009864683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027464539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007992935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041899243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14524812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921820358","doi":"10.21991/cf29376","title":"The Original Living Tree","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Argument (complex analysis); Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Supreme court; Constitutional interpretation; Doctrine; Order (exchange); Political science; Tree (set theory); Constitutional law; Judicial interpretation; Sociology; Philosophy; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02095871892531076,"score_gpt":0.28926106029253557,"score_spread":0.2683023413672248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921820358","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005613753,0.0031034483,0.00800468,0.022477547,0.0013804458,0.000062553656,0.00049122254,0.000114819864,0.9587515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34822935,0.003974394,0.008304843,0.018213993,0.00083709275,0.000133029,0.00057070074,0.00033501934,0.6194016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957279,0.00055988674,0.000102184604,0.00077456626,0.0019099857,0.00092547975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973864,0.00045482648,0.000079692785,0.0004043068,0.0013035161,0.00037136656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024958053,0.00043649666,0.00037461755,0.0013404238,0.011308405,0.0074427063,0.0015220839,0.0030670522,0.019790625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064299665,0.00028461724,0.0004339348,0.0019183524,0.017812312,0.004150467,0.0035131576,0.005949295,0.0027188836],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004169515,0.0000020062637,0.00008702849,0.0000096913245,0.0000011289205,0.000026148167,0.0008114532,0.00003876393,0.00003873551,0.9713576,0.022524409,0.0050990055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007844582,0.000006360217,0.0004972112,0.00008678339,0.0000070263077,0.00008900949,0.00073402683,0.00023213368,0.00015830866,0.14264259,0.855521,0.000017734184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5986762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6680131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5986762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027605314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038666107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80737454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922453220","doi":"10.21991/cf29378","title":"The Constitution of Canada as Supreme Law: A New Definition","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.024256995596565196,"score_gpt":0.26270637281413517,"score_spread":0.23844937721756998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922453220","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018506939,0.01887201,0.04708224,0.092759825,0.0040718624,0.00024398761,0.0017600295,0.00025829452,0.81644464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7661638,0.018606247,0.075724706,0.024152976,0.0023956296,0.0005942424,0.001795763,0.00034168354,0.110225074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99407333,0.00095037353,0.00020288666,0.0007765997,0.0028128575,0.001183946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99652207,0.0006198421,0.0001570071,0.00025230128,0.0020186605,0.00043009777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032615284,0.00059112575,0.000825567,0.0057835933,0.011931117,0.015030998,0.00279216,0.0032283573,0.0050633606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005296353,0.0004214427,0.00051962375,0.0072223553,0.032296803,0.005477485,0.0033065937,0.0069524287,0.0004738834],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.589091e-7,0.0000012155351,0.00007082099,0.000007940955,8.251608e-7,0.000016261245,0.0006388093,0.00007268524,0.000029222327,0.9939322,0.0037793394,0.0014496954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000156088,0.0000060865855,0.0015208756,0.00020725104,0.000014481354,0.00009008658,0.0019794023,0.0011312615,0.00013843154,0.30253536,0.6923093,0.00005183045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9123327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92006135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08766729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07625334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10136252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55325925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944893749","doi":"10.21991/cf29381","title":"Infusing Reconciliation into the Sentencing Process","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Imprisonment; Proportionality (law); Sanctions; Harm; Criminology; Political science; Sentencing guidelines; Process (computing); Law; Criminal code; Section (typography); Psychology; Criminal law; Computer science; Sentence; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.016811730600652185,"score_gpt":0.29741970741248597,"score_spread":0.2806079768118338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944893749","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041280538,0.0014684779,0.57378215,0.08337232,0.003659181,0.0013422143,0.00014546806,0.0017726024,0.29317704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7427154,0.00059713545,0.18277122,0.026760511,0.0018491278,0.0015165146,0.00013422019,0.0005944621,0.043061383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.77474314,0.16153397,0.008743658,0.011182407,0.034756657,0.009040184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88635904,0.07102868,0.0062070503,0.020502,0.013349552,0.002553707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08896583,0.00080950017,0.0010754706,0.0024374109,0.009478561,0.010460509,0.003888571,0.0090040155,0.008174854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22001745,0.001049863,0.0011301575,0.0015418694,0.009696312,0.016410412,0.022961402,0.01619721,0.0033114988],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008676587,0.000104836625,0.0014150759,0.00017522355,0.000047771293,0.00061289355,0.01405353,0.001628667,0.0012201846,0.8477374,0.022173362,0.11074425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064787775,0.00033147229,0.0018856169,0.0010865132,0.000093248236,0.0015467464,0.005695219,0.015116245,0.0063951295,0.66887546,0.29868802,0.00022158716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022448387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002695484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99775517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005063252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017999075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4705019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946090077","doi":"10.21991/cf29379","title":"Achieving Certainty in Treaties with Indigenous Peoples: Small Steps Towards Adopting Elements of Recognition","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Certainty; Treaty; Legal certainty; Negotiation; Government (linguistics); Constitution; Law; Political science; Indigenous rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Human rights","score_opus":0.012331494097884,"score_gpt":0.21853403112365175,"score_spread":0.20620253702576774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946090077","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062447097,0.005199192,0.13806173,0.2639494,0.002554068,0.0030445026,0.00007172596,0.0004980611,0.5241743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78050464,0.001982823,0.117969945,0.03792232,0.00093207037,0.001582185,0.000111359004,0.0002500751,0.05874457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93315107,0.031033149,0.0039123744,0.0041855276,0.019217957,0.008499937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9139087,0.055704117,0.0045700986,0.008269643,0.012477915,0.005069514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10474372,0.0005832465,0.0008885204,0.0022381789,0.016163524,0.021042753,0.005222105,0.011766588,0.005876415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12673073,0.00082725624,0.0012395922,0.0020245844,0.023825683,0.021442764,0.019561207,0.018030673,0.001134966],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002363733,0.00008875152,0.0007886775,0.00013371604,0.000017276989,0.00018823492,0.017428206,0.00074400584,0.0007294972,0.9200105,0.012832803,0.047014724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007941139,0.00020625837,0.0033864828,0.0009855533,0.00005703675,0.00019152714,0.023111988,0.0022354147,0.0014537638,0.4859834,0.48214012,0.00016905185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06397479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07266782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10474372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021209447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.083889954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55394435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948261530","doi":"10.21991/cf29383","title":"Constitutionalizing (In)justice: Treaty Interpretation and the Containment of Indigenous Governance","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Economic Justice; Political science; Treaty; Corporate governance; State (computer science); Colonialism; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Criminology; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.011877901389146147,"score_gpt":0.28299654782823386,"score_spread":0.27111864643908773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948261530","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043106206,0.00861306,0.015620834,0.12135752,0.001491952,0.000117431104,0.00029015844,0.00012698685,0.8092758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93382066,0.0021789295,0.003800882,0.01105651,0.0005851356,0.00008451246,0.00009902015,0.00008756024,0.04828693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.988857,0.003566123,0.00033386968,0.0010477945,0.0033814078,0.002813833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99375916,0.002988456,0.00040727603,0.00059595745,0.0018802946,0.0003689348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013975581,0.0003478873,0.0005303947,0.0021978084,0.014452883,0.015847258,0.0027340257,0.00485535,0.0058347583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021122474,0.00026003565,0.00040438317,0.0027470642,0.051596735,0.0050391345,0.004618922,0.006829558,0.00026918334],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031551465,0.0000021923406,0.000119232,0.000014273965,0.000002255742,0.00003156716,0.0039082738,0.00008237115,0.000047669448,0.9897473,0.003625757,0.002415853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027064792,0.000014843513,0.0028646924,0.0004329574,0.0000421672,0.000060264327,0.012156507,0.0007324924,0.0005429327,0.64846367,0.33459267,0.000069705064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8287952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8469023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94985396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050146047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07555148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3638367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971590923","doi":"10.21991/cf29387","title":"Ford and Irwin Toy 30 Years Later: A Conversation with Justice Montigny","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Charter; Trilogy; Appeal; Political science; Economic Justice; Politics; Context (archaeology); Sociology; History","score_opus":0.013361277003212772,"score_gpt":0.247270545106371,"score_spread":0.23390926810315824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971590923","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028496603,0.016140169,0.00016471004,0.95223016,0.0077728974,0.000014260562,0.000039285933,0.000014123054,0.020774769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06783117,0.008139792,0.0004137142,0.81866896,0.0042321854,0.00004704933,0.00002832289,0.00008248773,0.100556254],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936068,0.0024188533,0.00010918109,0.0008457125,0.0013782514,0.001641185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99487925,0.00254635,0.00012740021,0.0000834054,0.00083060394,0.0015330438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061332765,0.00072662777,0.0010310492,0.0011486931,0.041287027,0.012087516,0.0023611228,0.021219535,0.0076428032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012901585,0.0005449319,0.00069532846,0.0013809772,0.01656574,0.008233944,0.0039529847,0.032362998,0.0011103479],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022861674,0.000040875737,0.00045628086,0.00004302656,0.000009631042,0.00090081984,0.035325952,0.000043282296,0.00015301652,0.07991469,0.8759875,0.007102167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000892783,0.000011784995,0.00056231755,0.00014588107,0.000005349574,0.00018387217,0.02169428,0.00003802531,0.000084396954,0.0056618713,0.97157186,0.000031321393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5782691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7240267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5782691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036555406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026692046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8484291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971747884","doi":"10.21991/cf29386","title":"Declarations of Invalidity in Superior Courts","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Constitution; Declaration; Statute; Political science; Plaintiff; Section (typography); Doctrine; Context (archaeology); History","score_opus":0.0271129156239343,"score_gpt":0.3023245000844432,"score_spread":0.2752115844605089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971747884","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20079024,0.005881823,0.0115115605,0.066090174,0.0010295275,0.0001248268,0.00031419875,0.00016538378,0.71409225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95166695,0.0009486674,0.001912555,0.0120236,0.0006327936,0.00006428696,0.00009012107,0.00003320717,0.032627836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9703212,0.008686234,0.0022495508,0.0025035795,0.0103199845,0.0059194453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97209686,0.014891245,0.0034068606,0.0035951564,0.0049032294,0.0011066751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01867097,0.0002779276,0.0007297995,0.002027502,0.015968125,0.014407868,0.0019666913,0.010136635,0.0047299783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049800746,0.0011390689,0.00059053086,0.0024153327,0.01898981,0.0077503794,0.00883434,0.013476743,0.0006191113],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071812487,0.000008579745,0.0011411863,0.00001663019,0.0000040964924,0.00036211323,0.008681663,0.00018507567,0.00013724843,0.9787008,0.0073644565,0.0033909467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055392607,0.00006856526,0.007964181,0.0008243371,0.000050940354,0.0006340285,0.008591966,0.002478431,0.0018361909,0.46417704,0.5131591,0.00015982379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1268194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19560276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1268194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023788135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018478326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25216246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972240141","doi":"10.21991/cf29388","title":"Ford et Irwin Toy 30 ans plus tard: une conversation avec le juge de Montigny","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.022283115270421167,"score_gpt":0.28672480930960176,"score_spread":0.2644416940391806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972240141","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016762039,0.025558976,0.00081212935,0.8565727,0.004411941,0.00002066065,0.00009134346,0.000033598993,0.09573663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43139,0.014712048,0.001143726,0.31995603,0.0029415558,0.000078812765,0.00006327429,0.00022650103,0.2294881],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962992,0.001544829,0.0000556776,0.00049697794,0.0007366414,0.00086667674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99700695,0.0017436021,0.00011273479,0.00008082049,0.00061501557,0.0004408319],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037160392,0.00063980214,0.0006427229,0.0006598947,0.02566906,0.008974319,0.0016785676,0.010475366,0.006327369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062115123,0.0005904906,0.00032571238,0.0014026599,0.019553723,0.0067324406,0.0025125255,0.015839607,0.00078965595],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053189542,0.000026125626,0.0011359798,0.00008303403,0.000012222655,0.0009173433,0.1333759,0.000074084506,0.00025535753,0.28626084,0.56671196,0.011093836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001070553,0.000010627974,0.0014724879,0.00013679209,0.0000063593884,0.00015774839,0.035625514,0.000081765924,0.00014307075,0.007208672,0.95511144,0.000034820878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7965918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8596442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7965918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039229646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021187022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40921217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972266157","doi":"10.21991/cf29384","title":"The Crown and Government Formation: Conventions, Practices, Customs, and Norms","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Politics; Law; Political science; Convention; Transparency (behavior); Crown (dentistry); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021239921858551752,"score_gpt":0.2886348179734638,"score_spread":0.2673948961149121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972266157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14845677,0.034210343,0.009942727,0.0880874,0.0006835595,0.00005518929,0.00022487817,0.00016484353,0.71817434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97695017,0.0047166455,0.0013884021,0.0018566191,0.0000879918,0.000019705978,0.000053711832,0.000058147274,0.014868543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907685,0.002793538,0.00032098536,0.000834128,0.0029154425,0.002367395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915279,0.0031533292,0.001059183,0.00080224645,0.0018550456,0.0016022726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007491833,0.0003622691,0.0005073816,0.0025419851,0.020636402,0.030376919,0.0022946869,0.0023968632,0.0038526321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011952964,0.00031124044,0.00024930644,0.0055392715,0.084266275,0.0078055714,0.0057379263,0.0047030235,0.00043126792],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000098416895,0.0000067279893,0.0026535843,0.000047447622,0.0000046136533,0.0000876579,0.035043754,0.00019505521,0.00006665336,0.94185925,0.005697053,0.014328291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013333625,0.000019335552,0.033117227,0.0008636647,0.000025791001,0.0001699029,0.10327496,0.0010302308,0.00059274636,0.3339916,0.5267802,0.000121013625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89933604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9353311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9164654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08353458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08718498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60608864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990557264","doi":"10.21991/cf29389","title":"Advocacy Notwithstanding the Notwithstanding Clause","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Paradigm shift; Political science; Politics; Law and economics; Frame (networking); Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.02057622548626431,"score_gpt":0.2752041373246879,"score_spread":0.2546279118384236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990557264","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01769317,0.0027132775,0.025797727,0.5592756,0.0044266833,0.0001096076,0.000065307155,0.00006845599,0.38985014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70861316,0.0020578625,0.012295109,0.222185,0.005611107,0.00041671973,0.00007293589,0.00013298004,0.04861507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98388517,0.0075523355,0.00053411286,0.0021004514,0.004220227,0.0017075946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.975833,0.017187381,0.0017710835,0.0021979515,0.0020785716,0.00093202526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025760716,0.00040204328,0.0007645812,0.0009859133,0.0074188365,0.008512023,0.0018342756,0.014762871,0.00870814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04961096,0.00030427804,0.0008209473,0.0006292735,0.02002752,0.011947958,0.006958762,0.015725806,0.001327968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005525885,0.000008104024,0.00013567631,0.000016005455,0.0000035538906,0.00004502144,0.00069512887,0.000043721004,0.00007980968,0.989082,0.007052226,0.0028332602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002763789,0.00002616216,0.00024296017,0.000213765,0.000018590255,0.00012286958,0.0010047137,0.00043559636,0.00036750044,0.77694386,0.22057968,0.000016705153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025546665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026465468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99744534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003295616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00655881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13623726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991077786","doi":"10.21991/cf29391","title":"Shouting into the Constitutional Void: Section 28 and Bill 21","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Charter; Law; Law and economics; Government (linguistics); Political science; Bill of rights; Constitutional law; Blocking (statistics); Sociology; Public administration; Constitution; Business; Philosophy; Computer science; Advertising; Linguistics","score_opus":0.020440381728357857,"score_gpt":0.28113438042424244,"score_spread":0.26069399869588455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991077786","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01765454,0.003719073,0.0073064906,0.19179864,0.0058492995,0.00046047766,0.00056600897,0.00029475096,0.7723507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33376545,0.0018100241,0.008642458,0.28231117,0.0021510758,0.0007989133,0.00058940623,0.000485022,0.36944643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9643732,0.0058520357,0.0011784764,0.0028656183,0.015147263,0.010583347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98446184,0.0063135615,0.0006435421,0.0015093164,0.004937247,0.002134496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025344206,0.00069745927,0.00091475574,0.0014092657,0.018677672,0.0131425485,0.0039055564,0.020868946,0.009705625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04748239,0.000830659,0.00085031084,0.0014927542,0.02432745,0.004362357,0.0051802956,0.019878043,0.001922705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012861382,0.000013609431,0.00028483398,0.000015828191,0.0000024978624,0.000108496446,0.0029821862,0.00007846123,0.00019080476,0.9286286,0.06423803,0.0034437233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003615432,0.0000327285,0.0026267623,0.00028858476,0.000018228458,0.00012778935,0.0028970586,0.00025556565,0.0006382537,0.10145926,0.8914893,0.00013029335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7023361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8048353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29766393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03738941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1289709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5988338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991114952","doi":"10.21991/cf29390","title":"The Notwithstanding Clause and the New Populism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Legislature; Political science; Law; Context (archaeology); Convention; Politics; Populism; Commerce Clause; Power (physics); Establishment Clause; Dormant Commerce Clause; Law and economics; Sociology; Federalism; First amendment; Supreme court; History","score_opus":0.015098768931774672,"score_gpt":0.2648937825354698,"score_spread":0.24979501360369513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991114952","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0674858,0.0047873924,0.013331042,0.083669566,0.0012414306,0.000067575595,0.000116447016,0.000060501745,0.8292402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93006974,0.000985747,0.0026227,0.019376311,0.0012293233,0.000119399374,0.00006350585,0.00006245251,0.045470767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940601,0.001602006,0.00016000141,0.0008751929,0.001973749,0.0013289812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99553275,0.00246903,0.0003350371,0.0006583543,0.00072213734,0.0002826272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008107669,0.00034018295,0.0006686619,0.0014168924,0.009444642,0.007901772,0.0016884224,0.0062370454,0.0052250335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010929269,0.00037988872,0.0005545798,0.001109558,0.038015626,0.006301581,0.0044572726,0.009608245,0.0005947007],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002505234,0.0000017712429,0.000052983916,0.000002310251,5.651501e-7,0.000015083172,0.00035218135,0.000018291012,0.00002258251,0.9982552,0.00070383894,0.000572606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029507817,0.000015451107,0.0007219453,0.00008106377,0.000009100665,0.000063992076,0.0008717983,0.00035867403,0.0002563076,0.8818318,0.115736745,0.000023552688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04217599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056121342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.957824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008621884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0094798235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08386099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009688291","doi":"10.21991/cf29393","title":"Charter Injunctions, Public Interest Presumption, and the Tyranny of the Majority","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Public interest; Appeal; Law; Legislature; Political science; Presumption; Parliament; Politics","score_opus":0.04535792687533429,"score_gpt":0.26677757817221115,"score_spread":0.22141965129687685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3009688291","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04584476,0.002249586,0.020728327,0.11298471,0.0014011879,0.0002163514,0.00021193361,0.00017555509,0.8161876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79510677,0.0006349541,0.0047837268,0.045504913,0.0005898453,0.00024454435,0.00006877538,0.000068184156,0.15299833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9824587,0.0042708563,0.00045679178,0.0030054874,0.0049879253,0.004820173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923598,0.003095851,0.0006299289,0.0010572205,0.0021410629,0.0007160979],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013913785,0.0005427333,0.0006357036,0.0007298948,0.015783006,0.010364493,0.0031531265,0.011322735,0.0078065535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015283466,0.000551855,0.0007167124,0.0006847861,0.023050824,0.0038003905,0.003375879,0.011810288,0.0010127737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014410998,0.0000087046765,0.00032247044,0.000010021315,0.0000033293497,0.0001283378,0.0008469923,0.000110300556,0.00015408997,0.98587507,0.009659456,0.0028668495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020814582,0.0001626545,0.005355782,0.000388271,0.000074132295,0.0004083857,0.0026412879,0.003704217,0.0036093465,0.5165915,0.46666753,0.00018871491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.53535986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.66233796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53535986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035768185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038853675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.934753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014448542","doi":"10.21991/cf29392","title":"Seeing Double: Peace, Order, and Good Government, and the Impact of Federal Greenhouse Emissions Legislation on Provincial Jurisdiction","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Legislation; Greenhouse gas; Federalism; Government (linguistics); Law; Political science; Public administration; Cooperative federalism; Order (exchange); Parliament; Politics; Economics; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.02374672746555814,"score_gpt":0.22877400903918657,"score_spread":0.20502728157362843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014448542","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16192108,0.0039506317,0.0145029705,0.17892794,0.0005527588,0.000055910783,0.00023539655,0.00007258185,0.63978064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814208,0.00061538303,0.0012196872,0.006242816,0.00006527827,0.000016629909,0.0000224451,0.000016124824,0.010380856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918669,0.0021632926,0.00017535668,0.0007758738,0.0027002157,0.0023184144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99325234,0.0036575426,0.00045451548,0.0003838511,0.0018552315,0.00039644697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053565977,0.00020263618,0.00030025686,0.0010413085,0.016231012,0.013065921,0.0017601288,0.0038728,0.0036964302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015744112,0.00025392752,0.00043986746,0.0014588882,0.042862926,0.005313261,0.004008018,0.0066012503,0.0001892567],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050329522,0.0000022468907,0.0005411969,0.00000785931,0.0000016351732,0.000045662593,0.0036456957,0.0001828175,0.000048602713,0.99130356,0.002257612,0.0019581488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003368385,0.00002563043,0.011580637,0.00029774566,0.00007090049,0.00010881486,0.026780024,0.0027631796,0.0015921842,0.78948504,0.16716792,0.000094197996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86755806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92001563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13244194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.067625426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06949101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49065912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3032934504","doi":"10.21991/cf29398","title":"Universities, the Charter, Doug Ford, and Campus Free Speech","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Free speech; Government (linguistics); Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.019671048416240216,"score_gpt":0.2430327299145546,"score_spread":0.2233616814983144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3032934504","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006443878,0.021908814,0.0006383797,0.52097404,0.010374651,0.00004839617,0.0007331613,0.00018882008,0.4386899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11082204,0.009415097,0.00057741214,0.06358073,0.002609893,0.00007017291,0.00043200026,0.00023279808,0.8122598],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930034,0.0009844702,0.00016094562,0.0006312921,0.003111388,0.002108434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99164176,0.0018016611,0.0004350438,0.00041383982,0.00227741,0.0034303505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039476804,0.00043666808,0.00034671224,0.0012012533,0.023850754,0.015588959,0.0013192615,0.0069305045,0.047914993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012823628,0.00048073396,0.00026665095,0.0024059422,0.010209175,0.008444972,0.0040219603,0.0069581033,0.0086533725],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001487381,0.000004967168,0.00021375078,0.000025883452,7.477834e-7,0.000040588522,0.0019480225,0.000022500117,0.000024061233,0.070761055,0.9181008,0.008842653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038428434,0.000002528974,0.0006337225,0.00005020511,0.0000010877085,0.000013353314,0.0026487429,0.000017350076,0.0000330967,0.0017431442,0.99484104,0.000011878212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8489573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92045045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94053805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059461974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058196273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43142885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033184756","doi":"10.21991/cf29400","title":"Un-Chartered Waters: Ontario’s Campus Speech Directive and the Intersections of Academic Freedom, Expressive Freedom, and Institutional Autonomy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Directive; Academic freedom; Harassment; Government (linguistics); Free speech; Political science; Autonomy; Christian ministry; Sociology; Law; Higher education; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.026411209778183037,"score_gpt":0.2871335909468699,"score_spread":0.26072238116868685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033184756","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05628483,0.009619451,0.0015099815,0.28834176,0.0015676726,0.00007269433,0.0012080094,0.000119865144,0.64127576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6635045,0.007166066,0.0009388415,0.042422846,0.00065917236,0.000081426544,0.0005840754,0.00016612138,0.28447703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99418867,0.00073985575,0.00012574457,0.00038101143,0.002613732,0.0019509619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935342,0.0012305295,0.00044529187,0.00037990644,0.0020705347,0.0023395126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023309817,0.00031147464,0.00027892223,0.00087792566,0.02335426,0.011947576,0.0012727724,0.0039913096,0.013471888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060620513,0.00039404072,0.00028109827,0.0025867277,0.016908174,0.0045142435,0.0044714333,0.00544866,0.0015256577],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008824082,0.000026174812,0.0050721923,0.00016932616,0.000008128028,0.00062475185,0.0626151,0.00019412841,0.0004379109,0.46534476,0.42884982,0.03656952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013961796,0.000007230261,0.006709944,0.00016708401,0.0000063294765,0.000052618205,0.02204566,0.00009980563,0.00019263815,0.009328713,0.9613276,0.00004850112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9815201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99431324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8991994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10080059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14765711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7313629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033284431","doi":"10.21991/cf29394","title":"Introduction: Symbolic Politics, Constitutional Consequences*","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Democracy; Sociology; Diversity (politics); De facto; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.028190580018755452,"score_gpt":0.26772541568922875,"score_spread":0.2395348356704733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033284431","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032395325,0.023866657,0.0034514714,0.16082835,0.013895005,0.000032479897,0.00033077248,0.000082800994,0.79427284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3223016,0.023962058,0.002628633,0.07845886,0.034607556,0.00025552834,0.0006958499,0.0003350088,0.5367549],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987382,0.00056101836,0.000036723442,0.00019425829,0.00031413577,0.00015578578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981608,0.0010798599,0.00012887872,0.00022208397,0.00027755732,0.0001307705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011547963,0.0005421604,0.00028682235,0.0010587525,0.003986931,0.008503022,0.0010950727,0.0044867764,0.04007718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003921298,0.00018897018,0.00034995802,0.0015714294,0.011154334,0.006671854,0.003063328,0.005446859,0.005276894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057016377,0.000007804393,0.000094605835,0.000039921983,0.0000011385866,0.00002954003,0.0011700938,0.000038893533,0.000026243548,0.85308844,0.13801414,0.0074834744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047799194,0.0000085894,0.0004693222,0.00020499913,0.0000019282547,0.00008704656,0.0014114749,0.00013789542,0.00006761141,0.1980978,0.7995022,0.0000063250905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004895184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045062318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04007718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003971298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018570262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13407153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033340380","doi":"10.21991/cf29404","title":"The Toronto Municipal Election: Judicial Failure to Protect the Structure of the Canadian Constitution","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Constitution; Principle of legality; Law; Legislation; Supreme court; Political science; Judicial review; Legitimacy; Interpretation (philosophy); Subject (documents); Legislature; Democracy; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.017993900235984486,"score_gpt":0.2587652190297893,"score_spread":0.24077131879380478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033340380","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12724455,0.02166065,0.0035313752,0.2648189,0.0035113704,0.00036617383,0.0012398765,0.0002458771,0.57738113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.833937,0.006172958,0.0019727466,0.052222047,0.0007238286,0.0001348287,0.00032804298,0.00012664511,0.104381934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98332983,0.0017798728,0.00046196493,0.0016365696,0.0071707265,0.0056209946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9830951,0.0061534476,0.000612447,0.00093599316,0.006706235,0.0024967862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009691735,0.00048293767,0.0005267632,0.0016917371,0.045345087,0.009200008,0.004700951,0.007731162,0.0071610804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030118536,0.0010673124,0.0005459374,0.0028196347,0.016563606,0.002346059,0.004238133,0.012220076,0.00063769275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008957065,0.000016402582,0.0051106247,0.00016695584,0.000045484365,0.001176665,0.02491752,0.00068214483,0.00062202377,0.6569443,0.2855479,0.024680456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018263502,0.000038744503,0.02360916,0.00044233733,0.00019868094,0.00029204844,0.014548594,0.0015799016,0.0014082361,0.02936415,0.9280313,0.00030410665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99635077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99878293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7973473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20265268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3255106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9248099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033467396","doi":"10.21991/cf29397","title":"The Politics of Campus Free Speech in Canada and the United States","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Politics; Executive order; Order (exchange); Liberal arts education; Political science; Higher education; Public administration; Directive; Law; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.013957357414486496,"score_gpt":0.22911641902059113,"score_spread":0.21515906160610462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033467396","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11276934,0.028842235,0.0006923925,0.2861846,0.0027062828,0.00011741685,0.0012292553,0.00013953239,0.5673189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77709395,0.010782353,0.0005331531,0.057523556,0.00047372383,0.000082570106,0.00047659726,0.00016058436,0.15287353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98928773,0.0006815305,0.00014743111,0.0005815397,0.0033241482,0.005977601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866383,0.0017348875,0.00039892743,0.0002247938,0.0037968177,0.0072062346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034900396,0.00044688222,0.0006024859,0.0028539656,0.053874895,0.021092765,0.0022094375,0.005974343,0.01668195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010830774,0.00056188105,0.00048236482,0.0055003385,0.017487383,0.0037800039,0.007025354,0.008088349,0.0011971388],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019966728,0.00007853969,0.010644208,0.00016301419,0.000044626253,0.00083105295,0.02851811,0.0005629496,0.00033549068,0.50752395,0.39390385,0.05719452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064844215,0.000029112685,0.0318194,0.00056927325,0.00004599367,0.00011032424,0.056385666,0.0005605464,0.00028637855,0.017961558,0.89191777,0.00024902791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9976307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2811549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2811549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34979025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8337584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033585614","doi":"10.21991/cf29395","title":"Compelling Freedom on Campus: A Free Speech Paradox","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Charter; Political science; Entitlement (fair division); Coercion (linguistics); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03216580779953247,"score_gpt":0.26786256532552793,"score_spread":0.23569675752599545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033585614","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.069769435,0.0028393792,0.007767022,0.17962547,0.0008792972,0.000059261944,0.00035825762,0.000165579,0.7385363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90611225,0.0012340217,0.0008523365,0.037729207,0.0017858117,0.00010606837,0.00012206288,0.0001493986,0.051908743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99298495,0.0027168838,0.00021701443,0.00090594444,0.0019170763,0.0012581944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875238,0.009481271,0.0004810055,0.0007361441,0.0007408928,0.0010368616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076741935,0.00044277104,0.0006939592,0.0013345362,0.015778072,0.014181103,0.002515393,0.013793781,0.02408562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019440982,0.0004437082,0.0006066623,0.0015687541,0.019617738,0.012024451,0.0082664285,0.015631171,0.0031377666],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014157222,0.000023235685,0.00011998057,0.000013404811,0.0000034311486,0.00013051071,0.0023895213,0.00017157749,0.00007526245,0.9789488,0.0144222835,0.0036879007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006054538,0.00001427123,0.0004301308,0.00009499017,0.000011261406,0.00008076071,0.0030032038,0.0008696076,0.0002800204,0.8572062,0.13790454,0.000044516837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026393881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027569676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026393881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010105015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007112106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08057439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033746043","doi":"10.21991/cf29403","title":"The Conscientious Objection of Medical Practitioners to the CPSO’s “Effective Referral” Requirement","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Immorality; Conscientious objector; Law; Freedom of religion; Plaintiff; Sociology; Action (physics); Morality; Political science; Human rights","score_opus":0.040560526158433426,"score_gpt":0.3362132885655212,"score_spread":0.29565276240708777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033746043","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04411875,0.0018598596,0.004597899,0.6850475,0.005897691,0.0002736271,0.00017130357,0.00013610664,0.25789732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47159582,0.001368668,0.0031430214,0.46631297,0.004211918,0.0002542631,0.00006978971,0.00009684123,0.052946735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97646993,0.0048614503,0.0022796004,0.0024478908,0.008817502,0.005123684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9611366,0.021245493,0.0045413296,0.002756997,0.0062809703,0.0040385993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012509794,0.000268315,0.0004936123,0.00069821335,0.011468705,0.0049635875,0.0032957147,0.023037478,0.0050956975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06451294,0.0006983265,0.00089668937,0.0013369058,0.018465208,0.002456857,0.0056620315,0.022160161,0.0009305878],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000114966395,0.00008025549,0.014953244,0.00042799543,0.000032113207,0.0067365766,0.08452466,0.000566807,0.0027015302,0.571733,0.29960343,0.018525356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006630886,0.000059553266,0.021240504,0.0008648772,0.000024419642,0.0021582611,0.024897497,0.0006464178,0.00067011995,0.025207762,0.9239939,0.00017048528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34083927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47264105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34083927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021356078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032586783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6777107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033782100","doi":"10.21991/cf29385","title":"fragile équilibre des intérêts locaux et nationaux dans l'interprétation de la compétence fédérale sur l'aéronautique: l'exemple du parachutisme","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011043121069756481,"score_gpt":0.27771550129420053,"score_spread":0.26667238022444406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033782100","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10215224,0.0039129425,0.034077823,0.08856071,0.0007392499,0.00007201558,0.00019092414,0.00009040594,0.77020377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95196164,0.00084754877,0.0034858284,0.0030009754,0.000106943335,0.000071371476,0.000045662196,0.00004643677,0.0404336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99709225,0.0013421301,0.00007378942,0.00042264455,0.0004894542,0.00057969376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863416,0.00054685905,0.00016547585,0.00017991086,0.00028563727,0.00018801366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029183363,0.0003869481,0.00036975456,0.0013298151,0.008650547,0.009174124,0.0012141943,0.0038595796,0.010994117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038184933,0.0002524658,0.00050590147,0.0013742776,0.025358338,0.006130885,0.0063126385,0.00449914,0.0007031129],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007350435,0.0000053935746,0.00049052184,0.00001736411,0.0000024218648,0.00011391501,0.013573827,0.0001595378,0.00012401093,0.97989196,0.0019494735,0.0036642707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021612319,0.000029545128,0.0077608856,0.00039490365,0.00002309921,0.00028646569,0.046297774,0.0015494269,0.0005422934,0.61356413,0.32946894,0.000060913884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.107196234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17417146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.107196234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01548792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009401779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2131446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033795301","doi":"10.21991/cf29399","title":"Academic Freedom, Canadian Labour Law and the Scope of Intra-Mural Expression","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Mural; Collective bargaining; Scope (computer science); Academic freedom; Law; Freedom of association; Labour law; Censorship; Unit (ring theory); Sociology; Political science; Human rights; Higher education; History; Psychology; Computer science; Art history","score_opus":0.020545777426242893,"score_gpt":0.2553524037316265,"score_spread":0.2348066263053836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033795301","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020780105,0.00712021,0.0014038916,0.05839207,0.0003741393,0.000052359654,0.00012329358,0.000023540777,0.9117304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84345496,0.0049163294,0.0009318066,0.016973464,0.0002870444,0.00008724193,0.000077501834,0.00004922691,0.13322245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98814183,0.0020060092,0.00029584137,0.0010140513,0.0037322086,0.0048100897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909339,0.0036049178,0.0005653104,0.00053216243,0.0026189957,0.001744609],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071379347,0.00045998898,0.0004968245,0.0030852626,0.044800133,0.017376479,0.0025366142,0.007049979,0.016912868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013210931,0.00044771066,0.0004893547,0.0041389945,0.05859918,0.0057013533,0.008616366,0.0072081154,0.0009319054],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067599626,0.000007343218,0.00067443476,0.000020276511,0.0000017520325,0.000080724465,0.0061116503,0.000076475924,0.000029872866,0.97556907,0.011930279,0.005491407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028808065,0.000019212648,0.00770339,0.00071715313,0.000016225134,0.00019656404,0.020588629,0.0007386506,0.00021681453,0.3586597,0.610991,0.0001238889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9603716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96664554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85454696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14545302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1093089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99115336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W30383532","doi":"10.21991/c9v95q","title":"EQUALITY RIGHTS AND THE ALLOCATION OF SCARCE RESOURCES IN HEALTH CARE: A COMMENT ON CAMERON V. NOVA SCOTIA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Nova (rocket); Scarcity; Political science; Geography; Economics; Archaeology; Engineering; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.07020988164317626,"score_gpt":0.38097468895108366,"score_spread":0.3107648073079074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W30383532","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016924335,0.0059043416,0.00047233785,0.9126167,0.004450935,0.0000914113,0.00031252633,0.000025789275,0.05920155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12437079,0.0020293598,0.0005619829,0.8281483,0.0028138997,0.00014416037,0.00006303097,0.000038070062,0.04183042],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98767126,0.0026445908,0.00060796237,0.0012645205,0.0024713099,0.005340315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97710663,0.015450711,0.0014985199,0.0005419097,0.0027167536,0.0026854316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012875123,0.0008695766,0.0013570187,0.0012579334,0.01987359,0.01032009,0.004889209,0.06255923,0.0064608417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032083075,0.001686762,0.0021474457,0.0017643456,0.015449462,0.005008096,0.006477913,0.037852965,0.0010261895],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033602864,0.000055978177,0.0036936281,0.00028500924,0.000055224275,0.0027051861,0.013873341,0.00069628545,0.0013633212,0.44240516,0.5266102,0.007920715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008964943,0.00020209073,0.025863865,0.0030716588,0.00033733624,0.0010571412,0.01330931,0.0015471748,0.0022807654,0.0726265,0.8781659,0.0006417945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7954934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85365844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20450658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038587555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0690105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4114219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W30997202","doi":"10.21991/c9jm2w","title":"THE AGENDA FOR CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03551807080612919,"score_gpt":0.270103260699384,"score_spread":0.23458518989325483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W30997202","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001897892,0.019131452,0.004965499,0.7888286,0.0055062566,0.000056350946,0.000117766904,0.00004774386,0.17944834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49498564,0.024441661,0.01586123,0.27525133,0.030103013,0.001074065,0.0004535462,0.0003365919,0.15749285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9740283,0.014326089,0.0007944302,0.0024825474,0.005299084,0.0030695724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97869235,0.012381224,0.00093354686,0.0024591943,0.0031222915,0.0024113234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032957267,0.0008387411,0.0017331492,0.0029057183,0.010693228,0.020834936,0.0022899867,0.025365414,0.01826598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04046802,0.00070694776,0.0011870238,0.0019730849,0.03574019,0.030800452,0.008238486,0.032010943,0.0028495574],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006596412,0.000015925265,0.000029462699,0.000024197687,0.0000022906056,0.00001144367,0.00030204348,0.00008828115,0.000031346495,0.9800496,0.016518703,0.0029200597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018390869,0.000004796099,0.000058828948,0.00011564806,0.0000028395655,0.000007239974,0.00041341293,0.0001538413,0.000029394605,0.87948465,0.11970282,0.000008121046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056353235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004610944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032957267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015073223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023773918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1742968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3116045060","doi":"","title":"Do Consumers Really Benefit from the Federal Paramountcy Doctrine? A Critique of Director of Criminal and Penal Prosecutions v Telus Communications Inc.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Business; Consumer protection; Service (business); Political science","score_opus":0.04411511722768317,"score_gpt":0.3174324300674451,"score_spread":0.2733173128397619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3116045060","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04028498,0.0069994126,0.0042315787,0.47944683,0.0005794922,0.000072877534,0.00026856823,0.000089073605,0.4680272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7711527,0.002407797,0.0013176405,0.14140828,0.0004575505,0.00007476377,0.000059427115,0.00006366272,0.083058186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944998,0.0012940431,0.00008438421,0.0005721971,0.0017482374,0.0018013876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954377,0.002436884,0.00018739719,0.00020382398,0.0013688056,0.0003654591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044454494,0.0003425231,0.00039517944,0.0012384286,0.015463887,0.010957898,0.0026549997,0.014250693,0.006052692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010400429,0.00048916956,0.0006762861,0.0015143357,0.025528558,0.0036567233,0.0015964913,0.011927058,0.0005823009],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010834947,0.000007880691,0.00070608547,0.000018572693,0.000004554704,0.00016098616,0.004933758,0.00009416354,0.000098023054,0.94920737,0.040150866,0.004606867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010642306,0.000037772246,0.009743403,0.0006418307,0.000079819765,0.0003982489,0.0193864,0.0017238006,0.00092404266,0.21014367,0.7566604,0.00015416242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9264515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94572884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9264515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06935431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05878935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5032031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121492773","doi":"10.21991/c97m23","title":"On The Trinity Western University Controversy: An Argument for a Christian Law School in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.030378373017318522,"score_gpt":0.2897247159256101,"score_spread":0.2593463429082916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121492773","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09907925,0.0037332543,0.001228419,0.5438058,0.0016781557,0.00011646215,0.00013063272,0.00006791856,0.35016003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76763576,0.0014222587,0.0009020773,0.1432163,0.0004371081,0.00007180306,0.000061046536,0.000111162604,0.0861424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880576,0.0019004166,0.00017240427,0.00093960785,0.0031251176,0.005804877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803656,0.0049132234,0.00066079124,0.0005814248,0.004620981,0.0088579785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0078076287,0.00038086195,0.0006473273,0.002262023,0.06830553,0.015597392,0.0034410541,0.015679853,0.013510696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025328267,0.00069645,0.0007165768,0.003091684,0.03179121,0.0044195764,0.008250131,0.01790095,0.0006655542],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069823276,0.000055248456,0.003503057,0.00005530423,0.000017427574,0.00047700354,0.017499665,0.00028291726,0.000207478,0.8644865,0.10318622,0.010159363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021328374,0.000056964658,0.018992934,0.00061358523,0.000105313986,0.00021228088,0.055204384,0.0016229423,0.0007490488,0.10142474,0.82051027,0.0002943801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9882605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99362755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14982364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14982364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30147856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9860841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122021206","doi":"10.21991/c9f37p","title":"SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC RIGHTS? LESSONS FROM SOUTH AFRICA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social rights; Political science; Development economics; Economic growth; Human rights; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.07820777877036614,"score_gpt":0.2358387415988572,"score_spread":0.15763096282849107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122021206","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13254324,0.12297148,0.002474607,0.39555898,0.0010552076,0.00009214596,0.00020279671,0.00002070434,0.34508085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.903722,0.069425955,0.0010448229,0.013134825,0.0004441818,0.00006581158,0.00005450127,0.0000302305,0.012077673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988965,0.00043182803,0.00004930326,0.00007206632,0.0001057063,0.00044460615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99512804,0.003770664,0.0002494775,0.00015392835,0.000370363,0.00032747758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033022042,0.0006390269,0.000841497,0.001588173,0.0042306837,0.005294738,0.00074383826,0.002732683,0.010189058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068942956,0.00029362607,0.0003762207,0.0026561776,0.009323035,0.009984738,0.0049945177,0.005018897,0.0003673053],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013123237,0.00008653415,0.00256178,0.0011606121,0.000047202448,0.003784291,0.061249945,0.0010134118,0.0005487522,0.81550443,0.015981862,0.09792993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009200482,0.00006279703,0.008449169,0.006085052,0.00008971066,0.0011074219,0.11001888,0.00048641552,0.0007005699,0.559375,0.313473,0.00005997623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06405371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08237856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06405371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00818198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009239641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12736177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122432850","doi":"10.21991/cf29401","title":"Nothing to Declare: A Response to Grégoire Webber, Eric Mendelsohn, Robert Leckey, and Léonid Sirota on the Effects of the Notwithstanding Clause","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Declaration; Charter; State (computer science); Political science; Establishment Clause; Nothing; Secularism; Legislature; Sociology; Philosophy; Supreme court; First amendment; Politics; Computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.021922191032255536,"score_gpt":0.2682099569051747,"score_spread":0.24628776587291915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122432850","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00030509118,0.0020180196,0.000064970794,0.9851392,0.005248591,0.0000123714735,0.000038654834,0.00001916972,0.0071540335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0033719817,0.0007579846,0.000116092364,0.9745762,0.0019650566,0.00002051917,0.000014104112,0.000034568835,0.019143485],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99132466,0.0023381854,0.0003358488,0.0014820733,0.002932536,0.0015866895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854801,0.009110549,0.00052497286,0.00037196768,0.0026966974,0.001815581],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009289874,0.0013550635,0.0011787248,0.00096707995,0.022769302,0.01027792,0.004992639,0.046767283,0.013504241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026863845,0.0013725327,0.0008827654,0.0012847577,0.014637573,0.0077475705,0.0036279524,0.054710623,0.005440036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000088282,0.000007839155,0.000070465794,0.000016841792,0.0000023226683,0.00012754742,0.00075203413,0.00001907217,0.000050490045,0.009402354,0.98804873,0.0014935074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026827316,0.000011624412,0.0005293773,0.00022367113,0.000009067445,0.00014327133,0.003261665,0.000099567835,0.00019666247,0.004475185,0.99095726,0.000065739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36292866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5431486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36292866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021690851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033370525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72163236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123210615","doi":"10.21991/c9sd4r","title":"Autonomy, Subsidiarity, Solidarity: Foundations of Cooperative Federalism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidiarity; Federalism; Constitution; Political science; Solidarity; Law and economics; Autonomy; Law; Cooperative federalism; Dual federalism; Guardian; Jurisprudence; Sociology; Politics; Economics; European union","score_opus":0.02673319842238489,"score_gpt":0.3017333562858499,"score_spread":0.275000157863465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123210615","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04542861,0.0056021386,0.13173267,0.08728586,0.0005253267,0.00008356488,0.00012767011,0.00013193562,0.7290822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97546935,0.0014895649,0.0106541645,0.001656859,0.00027168402,0.00007688536,0.00004606463,0.00002306279,0.010312456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99695754,0.001344362,0.000078064986,0.0003193426,0.0007146222,0.0005860438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99605995,0.002286548,0.00033183314,0.00039990697,0.0005332309,0.00038838832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004867193,0.00019976628,0.00039754173,0.0011541453,0.004800597,0.008671283,0.000936128,0.003511325,0.0038361044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007905018,0.00023730156,0.00046031884,0.0015448793,0.025895773,0.0062136734,0.003155656,0.0036298332,0.00044760335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.081497e-7,0.0000015893495,0.000024130526,0.0000023739397,3.3182926e-7,0.000004721836,0.00012524682,0.000094241135,0.0000069314947,0.9988016,0.00031104664,0.0006272368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036261,0.000001566593,0.00010450291,0.000017095477,0.0000012465599,0.0000085391075,0.000113936,0.00042053568,0.000023001936,0.9911951,0.00810869,0.0000022430077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041823298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028246988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041823298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012235442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011455576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0887748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124311134","doi":"10.21991/c9p955","title":"Upper House Reform in Germany: the Commission for the Modernization of the Federal System","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; German; Modernization theory; Lower house; Conviction; Political science; Competition (biology); Law; Commission; Public administration; Politics; History","score_opus":0.03634186960292081,"score_gpt":0.2694650440814788,"score_spread":0.23312317447855802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124311134","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28491446,0.035088968,0.0064952807,0.27438745,0.0036700438,0.00014977982,0.00043262306,0.00027222425,0.39458913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94803864,0.0021766748,0.0015695975,0.012370113,0.00053676235,0.00006242912,0.000087265784,0.000030352321,0.035128277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99254745,0.0022071062,0.00022947404,0.0007125529,0.0013082677,0.0029952044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99749136,0.00078152947,0.00025648336,0.00046770088,0.00036996193,0.000633002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01040284,0.0004063342,0.0005800467,0.0017819707,0.0061950833,0.010608113,0.0010997321,0.0073157274,0.0041983547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01180423,0.00044336446,0.00057064387,0.0018992155,0.009716764,0.0051028677,0.005239781,0.004609071,0.0004940576],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025449881,0.0000145088725,0.0005132755,0.00002910889,0.000007704737,0.00005995996,0.0011837416,0.00035175003,0.000109250155,0.97503203,0.014681153,0.007992078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015627942,0.00009710072,0.01736888,0.00056726055,0.00006122436,0.00012248814,0.0028666263,0.002354921,0.00141211,0.28562084,0.6892424,0.00012978849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17316878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16940357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17316878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02704406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023756362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34432167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124666853","doi":"10.21991/c94q1t","title":"Addressing the Senate’s “Triple-Deficit”: The Senate as Driver of its own Reform","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Democratic deficit; Democracy; Constitution; Accountability; Law; Political science; Nomination; Politics; Public administration","score_opus":0.08137294387800247,"score_gpt":0.32893055160849527,"score_spread":0.2475576077304928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124666853","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05137391,0.0061144237,0.0033712354,0.5769824,0.0027401273,0.00006188829,0.0002978456,0.00012788501,0.35893035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7506553,0.0032030183,0.0013422936,0.18320769,0.0016309008,0.00011989431,0.00012103336,0.00019622922,0.05952366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9812476,0.0077635944,0.00048258353,0.0010906263,0.0038566259,0.0055589066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98693997,0.0038770593,0.0006232603,0.0010095165,0.003975162,0.0035751427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01661893,0.00055547996,0.0008044419,0.0017073879,0.01835924,0.019086875,0.0019776414,0.012775649,0.012312378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022032095,0.0005004654,0.0009961126,0.0024262574,0.020567238,0.0069602253,0.013389391,0.017834667,0.001542858],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014280598,0.000016534264,0.001117237,0.000041072602,0.00001600085,0.00021240453,0.0032780413,0.00017725294,0.0001777323,0.9351128,0.054320253,0.0055164755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045524783,0.000050296516,0.0045082304,0.0005471019,0.000058032,0.0002500062,0.008587517,0.00060446287,0.0010703641,0.13869846,0.845447,0.00013301785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26172763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35822225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26172763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02532779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.057650298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5204084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124769274","doi":"10.21991/c99h4f","title":"IMPOVERISHMENT OF THE LAW BY THE LAW: A CRITIQUE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL’S VISION OF THE RULE OF LAW AND THE FEDERAL PRINCIPLE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.020277116185443533,"score_gpt":0.22294320126077405,"score_spread":0.20266608507533052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124769274","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012037358,0.015443078,0.019308627,0.85773253,0.0028663112,0.000044340515,0.0000911023,0.000050678995,0.09242592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6836146,0.008345529,0.010271527,0.26366937,0.016090564,0.00035386314,0.00007434151,0.0002927798,0.017287362],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95441705,0.022494981,0.0025624854,0.0057351775,0.011785992,0.003004332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9092636,0.073519275,0.0034202088,0.0047505316,0.0072746663,0.0017717252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043067466,0.0007660303,0.0034334997,0.004101343,0.012184487,0.01686126,0.006133878,0.045067474,0.0032228213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0766063,0.0014804834,0.0024293452,0.003616443,0.091105804,0.018141309,0.0062972945,0.051629085,0.00078335963],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010627837,0.000014714006,0.000078770085,0.000021103127,0.000009316053,0.000031123716,0.0012639354,0.00017691893,0.000019736497,0.99001116,0.0065463693,0.0018162236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024157713,0.00001005017,0.00019298535,0.0001143143,0.0000102279855,0.000034822653,0.00033548925,0.00035512692,0.000059951813,0.9700917,0.02874904,0.000022203783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034609437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023506273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96539056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020143032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022584375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22776526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124914215","doi":"10.21991/c9zd49","title":"The Manual of Official Procedure of the Government of Canada: An Exposé","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Political science; Politics; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Constitutional interpretation; Work (physics); Isolation (microbiology); Constitutional law; Engineering; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023274348880416247,"score_gpt":0.24181212346937886,"score_spread":0.21853777458896262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124914215","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013019934,0.01852051,0.045888387,0.077788316,0.003847142,0.00044490388,0.0021656523,0.0011300781,0.8371952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46339992,0.02053687,0.08055398,0.02801301,0.0013540165,0.00070888747,0.0020562734,0.0013220239,0.40205508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97648925,0.003128816,0.0008669251,0.0013734786,0.014917638,0.0032239142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99114066,0.0018616143,0.00031487568,0.00082262873,0.0053905803,0.00046967636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008903188,0.000627977,0.00060853135,0.0041660783,0.01714732,0.011886029,0.0029773982,0.0036860628,0.006034406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012857809,0.0007309978,0.00051711075,0.005652134,0.019761216,0.0030248626,0.00255666,0.006985712,0.0009436678],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005120876,0.0000070177343,0.00029125996,0.000049004324,0.000002860689,0.00004754148,0.0042761597,0.00018409942,0.00016796608,0.92646533,0.049177583,0.019326076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049513555,0.0000057687544,0.0020041903,0.00019887101,0.0000064264827,0.000053347398,0.0017992965,0.0003372216,0.0003176892,0.022825504,0.97240037,0.000046302943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9804534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9840565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87400484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12599516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29929927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9141631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124929283","doi":"10.21991/c99m2q","title":"Judges and Religious-Based Reasoning: A Response to Ginn and Blaikie","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Argument (complex analysis); Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Religious freedom; Sociology; Epistemology; Focus (optics); Political science; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.016122856781298718,"score_gpt":0.2935534222624382,"score_spread":0.2774305654811395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124929283","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012592522,0.0031008383,0.0001551129,0.98893076,0.0015069264,0.0000054130633,0.000013047704,0.000005363726,0.0050233346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.058158454,0.0029958508,0.00054987107,0.92638063,0.0026570915,0.000032034335,0.000015065697,0.000033481276,0.009177603],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96729517,0.014284614,0.0008847684,0.0043524103,0.009657963,0.0035251416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92459416,0.05503969,0.00187562,0.001444154,0.012332982,0.0047134017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036607157,0.0006743756,0.0016250474,0.0020242773,0.028202908,0.015359889,0.005384144,0.046704657,0.0033923972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0816521,0.00097532343,0.0010948401,0.0033582984,0.058538303,0.014694767,0.005997637,0.062450685,0.0007394109],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052232626,0.0000474336,0.00081605196,0.000073203984,0.000016157874,0.00042660107,0.018566385,0.00018762144,0.00014774995,0.43930352,0.53461915,0.0057438225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014003486,0.000034265413,0.0019077815,0.0008357933,0.000025121044,0.00028981463,0.025863906,0.00073524733,0.00035529022,0.15717788,0.81240207,0.00023272721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45361835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5414618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45361835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057910312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05087797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90195596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125035025","doi":"10.21991/c93x1k","title":"Purposive Interpretation, Quebec, and the Supreme Court Act","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Supreme court; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Point (geometry); Sociology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.012454290916723192,"score_gpt":0.25396228198520937,"score_spread":0.24150799106848617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125035025","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045530442,0.008346933,0.008433043,0.06425864,0.0008675386,0.000112164504,0.0006898782,0.00006461412,0.87169665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9206921,0.0024769763,0.0031954558,0.014015111,0.00027143295,0.00015342765,0.0002113676,0.000055318877,0.058928777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935627,0.0029173756,0.00015165629,0.00054648286,0.001796774,0.001025061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99094945,0.004639674,0.00050625164,0.0006394252,0.002815127,0.00044999612],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065065254,0.00039990616,0.0004575409,0.0022068657,0.014148935,0.007236802,0.0019763478,0.0028992044,0.00817576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013186811,0.00027293625,0.00032580586,0.0031544024,0.015264174,0.0024328204,0.0021147744,0.0058520352,0.00040205094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007709405,0.000007241321,0.0007996717,0.000024342227,0.0000044127223,0.00010086061,0.0032159318,0.000106177176,0.000033859324,0.98005784,0.011406438,0.0042356336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062579005,0.000022376822,0.020841787,0.00084647327,0.00006371628,0.00016017356,0.013181091,0.002605519,0.0005242863,0.5072359,0.45434672,0.00010935832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9315193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96703655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06848067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048177414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04222473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34955323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125750742","doi":"10.21991/c9q375","title":"A Delicate Balance: Re Charkaoui and the Constitutional Dimensions of Disclosure","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Balance (ability); Law and economics; Political science; Business; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.030218855735044212,"score_gpt":0.2665382592094107,"score_spread":0.2363194034743665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125750742","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007999086,0.06225196,0.0029887964,0.90953654,0.005883126,0.000013213303,0.000026215237,0.00002930476,0.018471068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1624841,0.05174076,0.0072451457,0.7007546,0.048946917,0.00026516378,0.000045436394,0.00020916155,0.028308634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96210873,0.021090535,0.0021226325,0.0037971328,0.0091195395,0.0017614216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94303864,0.04747857,0.0020287808,0.0027231115,0.003579816,0.0011510144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04009681,0.00073865696,0.0017484275,0.0019639584,0.0077257864,0.016939979,0.0035574548,0.051469177,0.004581834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07899694,0.00092625205,0.00069481187,0.0019766535,0.07007726,0.04259355,0.0064891027,0.051836222,0.0015200828],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015564134,0.00001392807,0.00008465968,0.000075124444,0.000007270372,0.000057112768,0.0028206296,0.00006618483,0.000045128323,0.876627,0.108018234,0.012169192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027907547,0.000007681744,0.000118975775,0.00049599534,0.000008129277,0.0001645631,0.001455885,0.00013169367,0.00014291165,0.713689,0.2836953,0.00006208056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008297184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00878666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051469177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067786737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0138882855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21205473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126032045","doi":"10.21991/c95q3w","title":"Nonpartisanship of Agents of Parliament: Bill C-520’s Redundant and Likely Unconstitutional Approach","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Charter; Constitutionality; Bill of rights; Politics; Law; Political science; Public sector; Impartiality; Ambiguity; Public service; Law and economics; Public administration; Economics; Constitution","score_opus":0.03383397789530636,"score_gpt":0.2913964090708161,"score_spread":0.25756243117550975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126032045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035219602,0.0017349605,0.021175196,0.20155689,0.008257886,0.0006949051,0.00032775817,0.00039122332,0.73064154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4088462,0.00076872314,0.017764498,0.24209566,0.0044422364,0.0014856282,0.0003277299,0.00032454412,0.32394478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9709166,0.0063801114,0.0017640555,0.0040466874,0.010998725,0.0058938335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9831535,0.00702204,0.0009320376,0.0033216747,0.004155983,0.0014148047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01672018,0.0005422705,0.00066926243,0.0011371224,0.00927758,0.012700834,0.0029647534,0.02370386,0.0069361944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036651194,0.00088606746,0.0011883797,0.000735922,0.009320512,0.004571581,0.004251756,0.015975643,0.0034172952],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025940173,0.000064031025,0.00044163334,0.00003159402,0.0000076095776,0.00018329134,0.0012527679,0.00015179801,0.0007249769,0.91566145,0.07292907,0.008525791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008468131,0.00011471158,0.0026965914,0.00029215153,0.000035726007,0.00033851346,0.0010005193,0.0010281355,0.0017916977,0.14431779,0.848189,0.000110476656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023742858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02809607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97625715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064732623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015872413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.088425815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134237548","doi":"10.21991/cf29412","title":"Restricting Freedom of Peaceful Assembly During Public Health Emergencies","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Public Health Policies and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Section (typography); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Business; Medicine","score_opus":0.09492477648340834,"score_gpt":0.4033331576837308,"score_spread":0.30840838120032243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134237548","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051160645,0.002764215,0.019728098,0.1176453,0.0017880463,0.00038571534,0.00035314038,0.0002302634,0.80594456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87922347,0.0021081488,0.0068880706,0.037179172,0.0009799094,0.00030958225,0.00022364456,0.00013297898,0.072955064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97435045,0.0042332527,0.0009979497,0.0021264572,0.0070187985,0.011272983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9821118,0.00887834,0.0012781604,0.0023365917,0.0027387796,0.0026562775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024220329,0.0006250958,0.00085494417,0.0018559633,0.022431914,0.02081632,0.0049685542,0.01657292,0.010054485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035390213,0.00095200806,0.0008594602,0.0015850435,0.04692576,0.0073046763,0.012280699,0.0146016525,0.0014024709],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017008146,0.00003297741,0.0005700803,0.00003432589,0.000004766898,0.00023045107,0.0074646636,0.0005637763,0.0003639779,0.9736441,0.010231994,0.006841966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008955073,0.00008788779,0.0043188846,0.00094342633,0.000032038824,0.000303115,0.015599907,0.0017725399,0.0016681106,0.46421236,0.5107901,0.00018212352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.64683914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80716246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64683914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045845106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14902477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7104814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139205488","doi":"10.21991/cf29411","title":"Toronto's 2018 Municipal Election, Rights of Democratic Participation, and Section 2(b) of the Charter","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Public administration; Political science; Democracy; Government (linguistics); Representation (politics); Local government; General election; Section (typography); Law; Business; Politics; Advertising","score_opus":0.015306788955929419,"score_gpt":0.2880664323400087,"score_spread":0.2727596433840793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3139205488","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04026848,0.0033091514,0.0018699807,0.06816249,0.009954649,0.0008160336,0.0118259145,0.0005560881,0.86323726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23292388,0.0011653393,0.0023317556,0.009564651,0.0013980017,0.0005113095,0.003780495,0.00018181762,0.7481427],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954353,0.0003263106,0.00018609133,0.00032185728,0.002137933,0.0015924926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99718577,0.00032126182,0.0002365786,0.00019616722,0.001035762,0.0010244782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002079944,0.00047560284,0.00031949405,0.0009480801,0.008878251,0.0059148697,0.0011392252,0.004155409,0.018614857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068207597,0.0004420549,0.00027146115,0.0011580868,0.0041760365,0.0010626004,0.0022481605,0.004878815,0.0031089436],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059341182,0.000016150268,0.0011440538,0.000058512956,0.000003322476,0.00039671728,0.0051933927,0.000103330814,0.00036134807,0.24553981,0.73849475,0.008629267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012663532,0.000006692811,0.0047343257,0.000034426073,0.0000019921156,0.000034932706,0.0005984457,0.000032168842,0.00014892394,0.0010329318,0.99334735,0.000015207302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.867139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9468108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13286102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038395163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059089433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27857774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155090396","doi":"10.21991/cf29415","title":"“This Charter applies…”: The Supreme Court of Canada’s Fundamental Error in the Trinity Western University decisions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University; Royal Society of Canada; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Battle; Academic freedom; Charter; Sociology; Higher education; History","score_opus":0.04662990985390994,"score_gpt":0.2854992316328855,"score_spread":0.23886932177897555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155090396","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02446117,0.0054820827,0.0028695324,0.45670184,0.0044556395,0.00008630598,0.0004772785,0.00009658321,0.5053695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63057977,0.0024852569,0.0021778361,0.17093243,0.0019791666,0.0001160152,0.00023005143,0.00016347322,0.19133602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98993367,0.0016373806,0.00021590629,0.0011379747,0.0036835584,0.0033914763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907979,0.003489569,0.00030448218,0.00044612246,0.0038361403,0.0011258131],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007977516,0.0003929995,0.000480885,0.0014007557,0.030683232,0.01616275,0.0034946483,0.013068281,0.008662942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023680998,0.00046445982,0.00047234516,0.0020867048,0.022805687,0.0036916707,0.0032111318,0.014266824,0.00079051545],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011160612,0.000006346221,0.00045016853,0.000014114986,0.0000038646995,0.0001141055,0.003050061,0.00016578127,0.000042698015,0.8184947,0.17380872,0.0038383587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034561705,0.000011241568,0.002933039,0.0005395639,0.000030241052,0.00010492758,0.007800055,0.0014923395,0.00036349168,0.16882311,0.8177383,0.00012916457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9565748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9634156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.077063926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.077063926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13514178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55914056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155689419","doi":"10.21991/cf29416","title":"The Common Good and Legal Interpretation: A Response to Leonid Sirota and Mark Mancini","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Toronto; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Originalism; Natural law; Witness; Common law; Legal realism; Intelligibility (philosophy); Sociology; Epistemology; Legal profession; Political science; Constitutional law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01283745146986231,"score_gpt":0.29227039320821185,"score_spread":0.27943294173834954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155689419","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00083061674,0.0123510575,0.00018977509,0.97923297,0.001790687,0.0000044771077,0.000008842695,0.000008242597,0.0055832984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17802405,0.02585852,0.0016081729,0.76496404,0.009228701,0.00008186766,0.00003719471,0.00012830687,0.020069076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96197164,0.020628553,0.00083618826,0.0034076904,0.009847887,0.0033079537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9502719,0.03564105,0.0012258888,0.001139018,0.008290335,0.00343167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032703105,0.00095498323,0.0024701417,0.003365194,0.03482179,0.019265885,0.0057287444,0.027103484,0.004034334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046005223,0.0009803972,0.00095160457,0.0043589165,0.09070759,0.01743451,0.009427611,0.042995464,0.00072575297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003542095,0.000026966349,0.00025995498,0.000116525465,0.0000123015625,0.0003401759,0.026800858,0.00017345842,0.000069885304,0.5591082,0.40623263,0.0068235965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005625522,0.000016004687,0.000632388,0.0007620119,0.0000207538,0.00020040433,0.037104096,0.0005308984,0.00016978875,0.20185633,0.75850576,0.00014527095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5052402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.56502634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5052402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07866007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05924511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3156668608","doi":"","title":"Constitutionalism and the Genetic Non-Discrimination Act Reference","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Supreme court; Political science; Federalism; Jurisprudence; Law; Constitutionalism; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Sociology; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.05243330033126495,"score_gpt":0.308828175305707,"score_spread":0.256394874974442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3156668608","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029516935,0.008669943,0.016103547,0.15641673,0.003072827,0.0001689373,0.00029828836,0.00014070753,0.7856121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7849061,0.002505057,0.008214432,0.095814325,0.0016437954,0.00037362226,0.00024185683,0.00010056262,0.10620021],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97998464,0.0058881813,0.000742599,0.0028326858,0.0067310133,0.003820761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99344265,0.003470267,0.00035278144,0.0007100338,0.0014573756,0.00056683866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018250115,0.00052786444,0.0006558754,0.0016623653,0.014152202,0.010028222,0.0025320528,0.013579033,0.0044013015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022513093,0.0005110442,0.0007487993,0.001574799,0.032777283,0.004473206,0.0046162764,0.012627678,0.00086953427],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027649912,0.0000041030116,0.000047603604,0.000004408376,0.0000013686473,0.000023795254,0.0003415245,0.000051404364,0.00005068508,0.9957788,0.0025473037,0.0011461894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051043804,0.000043992648,0.0012950898,0.00020702652,0.000023661383,0.00008703263,0.00068795675,0.0005414575,0.0004621993,0.7139597,0.2825691,0.00007176335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28633755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30838594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71366245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022277111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03647878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5693418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160588698","doi":"10.21991/cf29420","title":"Intersections and Roads Untravelled: Sex and Family Status in Fraser v Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Political science; Constitution; Context (archaeology); Equity (law); Statute; High Court; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.017120867982033924,"score_gpt":0.2631981880009177,"score_spread":0.24607732001888377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160588698","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.274043,0.008920717,0.00064626354,0.26027408,0.0012122251,0.00018434993,0.0013818864,0.000054864387,0.45328254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8419381,0.0036525202,0.00041580154,0.08298362,0.00021881255,0.00007287657,0.00026753108,0.00006860029,0.07038228],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99505675,0.0003595893,0.00009037147,0.00037219442,0.001615425,0.0025056703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954665,0.0010296765,0.00019142548,0.00014011173,0.0013220697,0.0018501973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002711569,0.00025696112,0.0004948871,0.0017048871,0.044830874,0.006780179,0.004065185,0.007554152,0.010920087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007371078,0.0005961739,0.00066655583,0.002764217,0.01133614,0.0023654397,0.0040761977,0.012819711,0.00032025887],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012238069,0.00012583932,0.050259657,0.00014020741,0.00006779128,0.00489551,0.06687201,0.0008232616,0.000442476,0.5194959,0.3091038,0.04765121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008880809,0.00007403965,0.08874283,0.0012786043,0.00017431928,0.0012672285,0.1647254,0.0010970354,0.00073391653,0.034485217,0.7068769,0.0004557248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99712497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10311068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10311068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21176252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7481238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160687993","doi":"10.21991/cf29422","title":"The Alchemy of Equality Rights","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Supreme court; Constitution; Political science; Politics; Character (mathematics); Test (biology); Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03775945820894088,"score_gpt":0.3221107729389199,"score_spread":0.284351314729979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160687993","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0045084856,0.0032255065,0.015707185,0.041951824,0.00073117856,0.000038295944,0.00015937406,0.00006098834,0.9336172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76667845,0.004048459,0.011849704,0.027434371,0.0019827674,0.00030747429,0.00016473836,0.00020410876,0.1873299],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906998,0.0031062579,0.00026097227,0.001733471,0.0030138916,0.0011855047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996311,0.0015913685,0.00022696081,0.00084464444,0.0007466262,0.0002794292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066532562,0.0005170716,0.0005653886,0.0012010159,0.009718526,0.009741802,0.0014718252,0.0042358595,0.012751681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011741369,0.00043226645,0.00045322656,0.0010030904,0.05598503,0.01029859,0.0062153134,0.009824668,0.0021085648],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013147685,9.245367e-7,0.000012667053,0.000002769026,4.8436783e-7,0.0000053160097,0.00018556831,0.000019045025,0.000010167058,0.9977779,0.0013284165,0.0006553794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009051584,0.0000034095763,0.00006865594,0.00004056623,0.0000027216327,0.000024410698,0.00016771667,0.0001342002,0.0001041909,0.9139276,0.08551136,0.0000061420974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047658235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037213117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047658235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01200631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009771434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09476167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160943048","doi":"10.21991/cf29418","title":"Cautious Optimism: Fraser v Canada (Attorney General)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Supreme court; Adverse possession; Watson; Adverse effect; Political science; Medicine; History","score_opus":0.020940815336034077,"score_gpt":0.2713530270220552,"score_spread":0.2504122116860211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160943048","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003701027,0.003833095,0.00051837054,0.9056171,0.00590979,0.000042166015,0.00020972374,0.0000997972,0.080068976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.037853062,0.000926794,0.00080740603,0.90475833,0.0014022005,0.000036881225,0.000056310357,0.000051948755,0.05410702],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98878956,0.0010893438,0.00036752806,0.0024783209,0.0043828813,0.0028923736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918594,0.0021544306,0.00020083511,0.00026797978,0.0034429622,0.0020743522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006760594,0.0005830461,0.00065315946,0.0010215762,0.021252148,0.010368759,0.0042058113,0.037139837,0.0095033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016729597,0.00068036333,0.00089210545,0.0011348304,0.0112002995,0.0055068815,0.0023460067,0.03406377,0.0018104152],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025868663,0.000019838939,0.0010741167,0.000045153974,0.00001629543,0.0005743778,0.0021777784,0.00015329578,0.00019752391,0.10529964,0.879916,0.010500115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004143442,0.000024323894,0.0021917752,0.0003615945,0.00003914367,0.00041313743,0.0032461751,0.0003667368,0.00038481713,0.030319901,0.96243536,0.0001755757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88410664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9481273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.115893364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034374863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.108861536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24940825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161082780","doi":"10.21991/cf29423","title":"Comment on Fraser v Canada (AG): The More Things Change","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law; Section (typography); Constitution; Political science; Minor (academic)","score_opus":0.054828995842432934,"score_gpt":0.3091573711956767,"score_spread":0.25432837535324376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161082780","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013967997,0.0019396343,0.000115656934,0.93776083,0.012063361,0.00002835144,0.0003986275,0.00008572603,0.046211053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009877838,0.000618353,0.00012822835,0.9467446,0.0030201708,0.000024168115,0.00008550709,0.00007280364,0.039428372],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922226,0.00048403314,0.00021086214,0.0010636328,0.00379734,0.0022215343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99275243,0.0027687263,0.00036329715,0.00017370684,0.0029406284,0.0010011336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036018675,0.0008666913,0.0009997817,0.0017868232,0.026015906,0.006662875,0.004541203,0.04173839,0.019991672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01744304,0.0008110212,0.0012148208,0.0028669965,0.0097117005,0.00372289,0.0029364256,0.034279667,0.0051038703],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009559195,0.0000019149923,0.00014767589,0.000018879487,0.0000020040889,0.00019182877,0.0009057398,0.000012413132,0.00005051589,0.005571989,0.9918218,0.0012656277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016129157,0.000008744592,0.0012921748,0.00019028867,0.000013838679,0.00019443689,0.0033865122,0.000051337414,0.00019750919,0.0027041438,0.9918761,0.0000687308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8977548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94158185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10224521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039380472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050930515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28572667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161197987","doi":"10.21991/cf29421","title":"Critical Reflections on Fraser: What Equality Are We Seeking?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Victory; Charter; Constitution; Political science; Law; Reading (process); Politics","score_opus":0.09550983661906681,"score_gpt":0.39144068646995805,"score_spread":0.29593084985089124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161197987","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028011666,0.0057435078,0.0004153279,0.95857614,0.003470413,0.000018756007,0.00004012107,0.000012746381,0.02892178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19902863,0.008965743,0.00125645,0.745078,0.0057750363,0.00013445556,0.000037328915,0.00014273313,0.039581586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97774667,0.009345137,0.0004167992,0.002523241,0.005072593,0.0048955744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97015315,0.02056376,0.0012219246,0.00055979594,0.005297386,0.0022039239],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02583803,0.0011119006,0.0010825617,0.002528072,0.056159258,0.018964281,0.0051842555,0.026538454,0.00649506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04645085,0.0005394002,0.00091335666,0.0032423693,0.09056389,0.02081481,0.0079531,0.040854964,0.00089359045],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020431244,0.000015140902,0.00022527663,0.00011156491,0.00000614646,0.0003681528,0.09514508,0.000090719026,0.0000726333,0.5688965,0.33010516,0.00494328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014820742,0.000009745056,0.00032740494,0.00075887697,0.000009765039,0.00020583169,0.1703336,0.000100440426,0.00024936226,0.10965548,0.71826404,0.00007059188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.58416134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6235243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58416134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.067634925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06279294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8365752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161629668","doi":"10.21991/cf29419","title":"The Elephant in the Room and Straw Men on Fire","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Privilege (computing); Charter; Law; Section (typography); Constitution; Political science; Sociology; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.02563228055779123,"score_gpt":0.2960249134474994,"score_spread":0.2703926328897082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161629668","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05170615,0.009551379,0.0034578983,0.22820508,0.004927089,0.000033410455,0.00008122841,0.00008324173,0.70195454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7254464,0.0033095947,0.0016020207,0.036102504,0.00057864573,0.000034868324,0.00004648824,0.00018051459,0.23269899],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964439,0.0014351628,0.000041057625,0.00044036537,0.00061861007,0.0010207798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897313,0.00034940912,0.000054631506,0.00011549067,0.00014682257,0.00036054835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037867688,0.00044951466,0.00047208858,0.000708525,0.0388322,0.011116377,0.0013246263,0.006593953,0.017769001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005123005,0.00046257736,0.00037791577,0.0004946905,0.039442763,0.01182397,0.00796441,0.010045235,0.0022974494],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003834628,0.000031016174,0.00074658,0.000024597384,0.0000033704985,0.0006024372,0.045090005,0.000060914303,0.00011622533,0.83974016,0.098733544,0.014812754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014565678,0.000032905373,0.0008090685,0.0004119325,0.000007312183,0.0005114984,0.1376146,0.00016758333,0.00035079522,0.13313554,0.7269136,0.000030598054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07934699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2270613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07934699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007642463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014611626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15777028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170839569","doi":"10.21991/cf29374","title":"The Constitution of Canada as Supreme Law: A New Definition","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.024256995596565196,"score_gpt":0.26270637281413517,"score_spread":0.23844937721756998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170839569","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018506955,0.018872052,0.047082316,0.092759944,0.0040718657,0.00024398782,0.0017600292,0.0002582945,0.8164445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76616395,0.018606253,0.07572465,0.02415298,0.0023956278,0.000594242,0.0017957591,0.00034168325,0.11022493],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99407333,0.0009503726,0.00020288645,0.00077659934,0.0028128535,0.001183945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99652207,0.0006198424,0.0001570071,0.00025230128,0.0020186575,0.00043009795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032615315,0.00059112575,0.00082556746,0.0057835933,0.011931117,0.015030989,0.0027921586,0.0032283587,0.005063353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052963505,0.0004214427,0.0005196242,0.0072223553,0.032296833,0.0054774876,0.003306592,0.006952432,0.00047388277],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.589082e-7,0.000001215534,0.000070821065,0.000007940955,8.251616e-7,0.000016261261,0.00063881016,0.0000726853,0.000029222327,0.9939322,0.0037793375,0.001449696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015608804,0.000006086599,0.0015208767,0.00020725129,0.0000144813575,0.00009008679,0.0019794067,0.0011312623,0.00013843157,0.30253586,0.69230884,0.000051830466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9123327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9200613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08766729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0762533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1013625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.553259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186580513","doi":"10.21991/cf29424","title":"Quebec Bill 96 - Time For a Primer on Amending the Constitution","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Healthcare Systems and Practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Charter; Constitution; Bill of rights; Law; Political science; Government (linguistics); French; State (computer science); Humanities; Linguistics","score_opus":0.09266520972867619,"score_gpt":0.42117100481086495,"score_spread":0.32850579508218875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186580513","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016318524,0.013736419,0.0012573346,0.09035478,0.010390169,0.00072110066,0.00482345,0.00040371035,0.87668115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025258036,0.006241922,0.0026958636,0.10582436,0.0010713883,0.0008995502,0.0023829788,0.0004213683,0.85520464],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9843919,0.0018581816,0.0004693069,0.0013552973,0.008397715,0.0035276555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920995,0.0012081524,0.00019382616,0.00068441924,0.0050811497,0.00073291746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009892751,0.0012865412,0.0011136465,0.0031979564,0.016808674,0.015096813,0.0051220935,0.012933488,0.06534888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019738521,0.0012154203,0.0015478352,0.0042145634,0.005889787,0.0036878774,0.0031977105,0.016518893,0.01503666],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014213331,0.00001988067,0.0002637872,0.00007212015,0.0000043011287,0.00011556884,0.000575612,0.00016664989,0.00012860536,0.15343162,0.8367395,0.008467996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009286654,0.0000047053445,0.0007586264,0.00024127254,0.0000036531787,0.000017908327,0.00024033879,0.00003813007,0.000047556117,0.0017441545,0.99686724,0.000027105085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9800019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9851383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11447863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11447863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18091993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8306045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200060882","doi":"10.21991/cf29426","title":"Bringing the Mixed Constitution Back In","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Misrepresentation; Law; Jurisprudence; Mixing (physics); Salience (neuroscience); Law and economics; Quality (philosophy); Economics; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science; Epistemology; Physics","score_opus":0.02819535457613723,"score_gpt":0.23185336330836132,"score_spread":0.2036580087322241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200060882","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036549967,0.0023480707,0.02715819,0.042492926,0.0009632475,0.00008969421,0.00017256165,0.0001434692,0.8900819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92352223,0.0008170026,0.007833798,0.008402732,0.0002934345,0.00012419173,0.00012253431,0.0001440226,0.058740016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927981,0.0018367912,0.00017557255,0.0010153203,0.0024618546,0.0017124743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979087,0.00056879024,0.00010765316,0.0005328972,0.0006293331,0.00025269092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052345837,0.000471008,0.0004890922,0.002115528,0.011663769,0.0146628,0.0015425737,0.0036517459,0.009985974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008426442,0.00044601213,0.0005440427,0.0015321677,0.027605334,0.008818462,0.007817698,0.0069498513,0.0007853666],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017275946,0.0000010446641,0.000042475363,0.000002973418,0.0000010777894,0.00001753212,0.0005295103,0.000034349603,0.00003146976,0.9974087,0.0007182708,0.001210881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014071846,0.000012407729,0.00063275313,0.000095423806,0.000015115023,0.000075525764,0.0031697121,0.00079259736,0.00037532565,0.75514257,0.2396501,0.000024361989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24830547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28294143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24830547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02875652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028869076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49372035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200126117","doi":"10.21991/cf29429","title":"Checking the Other and Checking the Self: Role Morality and the Separation of Powers","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Impartiality; Separation of powers; Rule of law; Power (physics); Law; Democracy; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Legislature; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.019758544782407333,"score_gpt":0.2911096224306319,"score_spread":0.2713510776482245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200126117","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.097694136,0.00989799,0.036541194,0.20303889,0.0015084179,0.000056220695,0.000045348508,0.000066076966,0.6511518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97714305,0.0011641966,0.0032145958,0.006085272,0.0004034166,0.000043422646,0.000013405374,0.000041184136,0.011891465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98848104,0.0084182285,0.00016999143,0.0007524801,0.0011726052,0.001005624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99273586,0.004478517,0.0006799935,0.0007906164,0.000546657,0.00076836185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010779721,0.0003759477,0.0004259455,0.0012607769,0.0074501783,0.01110848,0.0013099306,0.0041575623,0.0038050655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010433988,0.0002886516,0.0004897584,0.0008925935,0.071521156,0.014668072,0.0054225745,0.007607097,0.00051793654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006442444,0.0000068075433,0.00007059225,0.000006416758,0.0000010077504,0.000018915127,0.0022237648,0.00004401398,0.000022934371,0.9952742,0.0010311755,0.0012938391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001342255,0.0000083642935,0.00016995605,0.00004759547,0.0000021370738,0.000029322493,0.0018098674,0.00023305084,0.000082534345,0.97877574,0.018819919,0.000008099965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038331077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028803428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01110848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004978881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00475372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05700928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200314862","doi":"10.21991/cf29425","title":"Introduction: Pluralism, Contestation, and the Rule of Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Rule of law; Constitutionalism; Authoritarianism; Political science; Indigenous; Law; Democracy; State (computer science); Legislature; Politics; Liberal democracy; Independence (probability theory); Political economy; Sociology","score_opus":0.018203095793587382,"score_gpt":0.2730624784854955,"score_spread":0.2548593826919081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200314862","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018329216,0.020915901,0.00587086,0.099998936,0.0018076391,0.000038703303,0.00014444056,0.000045206732,0.8528491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8728259,0.009447456,0.0024388975,0.014978472,0.0040910104,0.00011283242,0.0001252474,0.00007875426,0.095901445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99669695,0.0019197667,0.000091762406,0.00044291804,0.000505031,0.00034356452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969212,0.002117012,0.00026304225,0.00030186886,0.00020387831,0.00019297896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027640448,0.00031213573,0.00027125934,0.0009559346,0.0076588625,0.010033212,0.00078356644,0.003307012,0.009815502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040105754,0.00014332052,0.00035486982,0.0015688795,0.03513257,0.0063061183,0.0033969805,0.0047296234,0.0007868209],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002280709,0.000003435908,0.00006619327,0.0000103820275,4.5050137e-7,0.000012779516,0.0022144967,0.000027195943,0.000011114944,0.99113125,0.005010044,0.0015103276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069165635,0.000010639105,0.00037775133,0.00017170333,0.0000018796517,0.00007850791,0.0032192522,0.00012721938,0.000050542058,0.6324137,0.36353555,0.000006433667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004971408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004590086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010033212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044257445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031736498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03283614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201355671","doi":"10.21991/cf29428","title":"Harnessing Distrust and the Power of Intercession for the Separation of Powers","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Separation of powers; Legislature; Polity; Politics; Opposition (politics); Democracy; Political science; Distrust; Loyalty; Incentive; Law and economics; Law; Universal suffrage; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.01716585480203391,"score_gpt":0.3060020321003856,"score_spread":0.2888361772983517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201355671","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04819024,0.01005319,0.12172404,0.24655105,0.0027688928,0.00008887321,0.000047019064,0.00017584616,0.5704009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92541885,0.0030791783,0.010384782,0.02415487,0.001574158,0.00019412051,0.000016969714,0.00017692041,0.035000183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.992141,0.005208818,0.00014050503,0.0006433731,0.00097146985,0.00089477055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906046,0.0058639254,0.000986082,0.0012326089,0.00068145146,0.00063135766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009218207,0.00062303845,0.00054898945,0.0012509098,0.00891531,0.013556064,0.0017433007,0.0056381943,0.0044485293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011426572,0.00030837333,0.0007064985,0.00085159845,0.073044874,0.014702561,0.009682769,0.012001559,0.0009167791],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000400113,0.0000042143392,0.00006929917,0.00000970352,0.0000014411307,0.00003471645,0.005427488,0.00005193447,0.000049844253,0.99188906,0.0013015262,0.0011567291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009795386,0.000018626228,0.00013192066,0.00009722657,0.0000048650622,0.0001250733,0.0045543546,0.00032857154,0.00033010912,0.89333206,0.10105213,0.000015321544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002539578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035985524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013556064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005376448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034083915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048751116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201581927","doi":"10.21991/cf29427","title":"Are There “Sources of Resilience” When the Separation of Powers Breaks Down?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Separation of powers; Legislature; Presidential system; Politics; Political science; Independence (probability theory); Power (physics); Law and economics; Executive branch; Law; Sociology; Mathematics; Statistics; Physics","score_opus":0.02237820668620567,"score_gpt":0.28957387556443787,"score_spread":0.2671956688782322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201581927","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15970437,0.0075480365,0.05940353,0.33544818,0.0015328166,0.000112332826,0.00043053136,0.00053440535,0.43528578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825507,0.0011761804,0.0034495487,0.0055853436,0.00046277817,0.0000932429,0.00008225723,0.00014712516,0.006452883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99542785,0.0016844115,0.00011620693,0.00076314306,0.0007778069,0.0012305996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991668,0.0032947045,0.0015681802,0.0017795035,0.0008126981,0.00087692955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00631015,0.0006665562,0.0008127367,0.003126575,0.0055138348,0.012274789,0.0024132896,0.0039595743,0.012316212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021291506,0.0005164524,0.00068610604,0.002920152,0.049892794,0.030086482,0.010171727,0.006008156,0.0012871718],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002586141,0.000011047331,0.0011950391,0.0000311966,0.000017170381,0.00014529651,0.008740997,0.00028274627,0.00013526021,0.9779283,0.0044268137,0.00706029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009923771,0.000012061223,0.0014243128,0.000065519824,0.0000065750132,0.000082042134,0.008858375,0.00035416114,0.000087181696,0.96634066,0.022737728,0.000021390868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002296301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024959987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012316212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005632273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024615077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04120177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211574431","doi":"10.21991/cf29430","title":"Constitutional Forum constitutionnel 30.4","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Chemistry; Political science","score_opus":0.029196978327043904,"score_gpt":0.2879284674742533,"score_spread":0.25873148914720945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211574431","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019666,0.005871239,0.0017392348,0.021775624,0.01418614,0.0004912722,0.0040291524,0.0008009645,0.9491397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016309524,0.001463432,0.0009827322,0.023534073,0.007404627,0.00053016376,0.0011278755,0.0004533985,0.9481942],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99472094,0.00081459346,0.00028546705,0.0006711068,0.0026080953,0.0008998993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972831,0.0010746523,0.00012671312,0.0002994839,0.0009342896,0.0002816406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00438636,0.0010394482,0.0011347958,0.0028200343,0.005928826,0.009455756,0.0026281532,0.020030536,0.15263985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013535078,0.0009487339,0.001565367,0.001837723,0.0018182842,0.0032842925,0.0032234506,0.012140202,0.07233646],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011017961,0.0001590595,0.00030737923,0.00023672983,0.000022378712,0.0001879312,0.00026408088,0.00019142266,0.0015776639,0.15702395,0.81359684,0.026322449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004374627,0.000023674813,0.0013179948,0.00015701065,0.0000122769325,0.000036327332,0.00007559369,0.00011074749,0.00035811556,0.010141602,0.98769337,0.000029546565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028066572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036499754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15263985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058699166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067812097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5106312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211662519","doi":"10.21991/cf29432","title":"Constitutional Forum constitutionnel 30.1","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.02909037304181237,"score_gpt":0.2875596062081105,"score_spread":0.2584692331662981,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211662519","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015588539,0.009505462,0.0016133407,0.02661345,0.019047301,0.00050929486,0.0050674626,0.00079106,0.9352938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0155989565,0.0026436087,0.001150257,0.030140026,0.011774514,0.00072102784,0.001674524,0.0005608065,0.93573636],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939632,0.00090793986,0.0003364869,0.00081367104,0.0030559038,0.0009228924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968129,0.0013721588,0.00016843375,0.00031252654,0.0010266845,0.0003073575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004742703,0.0012146113,0.0013492486,0.0034526966,0.0064773667,0.010577658,0.0027893903,0.021868655,0.13070069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015842209,0.0010481337,0.0014741401,0.0024398188,0.0019305347,0.00353212,0.003271738,0.013385486,0.07255778],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081586775,0.00013438026,0.00023984078,0.00022443844,0.000015643296,0.00013693477,0.00020682116,0.00015317419,0.0010689963,0.13230759,0.84382075,0.021609863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037996506,0.000022592729,0.0012976791,0.00021155109,0.000010019748,0.000034390257,0.000067722336,0.00010502273,0.00026637086,0.009964817,0.98795044,0.000031491705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03031104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04111472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13070069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063846502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006665609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43723738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211786802","doi":"10.21991/cf29431","title":"Constitutional Forum constitutionnel 30.2","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.029155984664578756,"score_gpt":0.28784226264475604,"score_spread":0.2586862779801773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211786802","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017940212,0.0068739112,0.0015795422,0.022976154,0.017514072,0.0004577058,0.0044556544,0.0007512078,0.9435977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01632487,0.001703852,0.00097085943,0.026094668,0.010028249,0.00056711637,0.0013268247,0.00046553568,0.942518],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995374,0.0006731273,0.00024733384,0.00063489977,0.0023237139,0.0007470175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976422,0.0009800547,0.00011406976,0.00024015935,0.00078245916,0.00024103839],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038851094,0.0010842769,0.001116278,0.0028134047,0.005720195,0.009781303,0.0023397172,0.019609226,0.13636309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012143223,0.00092447235,0.0013954703,0.0018297074,0.0016564793,0.003193532,0.0029203102,0.011636777,0.06768467],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001034944,0.00015090995,0.00028761936,0.00021312322,0.00001888474,0.00017206211,0.00024491153,0.00015660308,0.0014904374,0.13492493,0.83912706,0.023110008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041182997,0.00002216706,0.0012829499,0.00015222568,0.0000105451845,0.000036567104,0.000070530325,0.00010380831,0.00029627196,0.0087576285,0.98919886,0.00002728054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026509088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03683506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13636309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004914119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005645326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45617998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W32879796","doi":"10.21991/c94956","title":"La « crise de la prorogation » vue du Québec","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026918283214373756,"score_gpt":0.27775479685726184,"score_spread":0.25083651364288806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W32879796","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34678474,0.009905202,0.0039292555,0.07775417,0.0008495553,0.00008602966,0.0010129779,0.00014984663,0.55952823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8893903,0.0012938346,0.00054382905,0.0025512408,0.00004277045,0.000022184257,0.00010163374,0.000028267224,0.106026016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982603,0.000355292,0.000028652612,0.00020906926,0.0004433588,0.0007031891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980306,0.00031669435,0.00012745614,0.00011186422,0.00082207896,0.0005912833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00116328,0.00019493782,0.00026473083,0.00087367895,0.0129093975,0.0051071155,0.0007275656,0.0012151089,0.012802175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002821495,0.00020428882,0.00021769693,0.0016418471,0.004536545,0.0011847775,0.0013293726,0.0025921182,0.0003810174],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016025615,0.000059722748,0.033874303,0.00021720985,0.000076645534,0.0009728397,0.032288894,0.0014543609,0.0024070393,0.73465574,0.09106055,0.10277248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020680625,0.000035994562,0.08432525,0.00026152848,0.000030869924,0.0001622573,0.016421512,0.0008330021,0.0007744548,0.008749591,0.8882951,0.000089833055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98921305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9961204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.070909254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.070909254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.081770904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51448506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3337198","doi":"10.21991/c9jt1k","title":"TEMPTED BY RIGHTS: THE EUROPEAN UNION AND ITS NEW CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Fundamental rights; Political science; European union; International human rights law; Law and economics; Linguistic rights; Human rights; Law; Right to property; Business; International trade; Sociology","score_opus":0.04120300074272405,"score_gpt":0.2634500340916267,"score_spread":0.22224703334890267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3337198","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017188175,0.019359656,0.034337748,0.47175676,0.013886267,0.00011458206,0.00034649044,0.0002193822,0.44279096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6186513,0.009210279,0.049942136,0.16988793,0.022121415,0.000698572,0.0005912397,0.0007156642,0.12818152],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9559921,0.019943899,0.0023082357,0.0055613783,0.011640641,0.0045537525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9735231,0.014670418,0.0021043431,0.0045855152,0.0031830105,0.0019336097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04322819,0.0010430128,0.0016782705,0.0024751013,0.010621234,0.04228238,0.0044823037,0.042480562,0.006394165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061105456,0.0011133824,0.0022490302,0.004030324,0.042391267,0.035226576,0.012186272,0.037708778,0.00080800045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075250723,0.00000909882,0.000021826181,0.0000070838905,0.0000024089313,0.00001276138,0.00042629775,0.000086666965,0.000019948635,0.99027413,0.007416166,0.0017162459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038312624,0.000015595782,0.00037579745,0.00019087107,0.000011742411,0.0000558865,0.00044045132,0.000417923,0.000103499064,0.8093052,0.18898492,0.000059752314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029138187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02687949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04322819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014679909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02356878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22861528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W34918110","doi":"10.21991/c9qt0r","title":"THE AMENDING FORMULA AND THE AGENDA FOR CHANGE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Art, Politics, and Modernism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.15160117121580427,"score_gpt":0.2773175479987673,"score_spread":0.12571637678296302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W34918110","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034033568,0.0057785017,0.013995595,0.79962504,0.016457375,0.00016530103,0.00006247495,0.00010198498,0.16041033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.456198,0.004722754,0.040382,0.383231,0.030082151,0.0017675165,0.00019420564,0.00044148235,0.08298091],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8727718,0.07822048,0.0068798107,0.009331809,0.022498405,0.010297708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89793944,0.06502536,0.0050289244,0.012065499,0.014370796,0.005569939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.101489045,0.0012365445,0.0026453023,0.0034891828,0.019437397,0.030601533,0.0050332234,0.061021153,0.0092988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18084434,0.001247927,0.001842142,0.0028159062,0.060413197,0.037332986,0.014473506,0.054107495,0.0018276437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008515221,0.000016923756,0.000029017361,0.000016932458,0.0000027978056,0.000020522812,0.0005714293,0.00006552022,0.000024523919,0.9844518,0.011967865,0.0028242075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045710956,0.000012915889,0.000076664175,0.00015030787,0.000007157177,0.000024681116,0.00052988686,0.00025615847,0.000045242177,0.89124495,0.1075692,0.000037123107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007106515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066647725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.101489045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015227672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03405224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5367318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W35222582","doi":"10.21991/c9th43","title":"TWELVE PARADOXES OF JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.0757601109956105,"score_gpt":0.348099049291131,"score_spread":0.27233893829552047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W35222582","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19897366,0.008892403,0.0929834,0.16598365,0.0010955699,0.00021677013,0.00033759917,0.00031917146,0.53119767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9743283,0.0013548566,0.013497458,0.003585252,0.00053410087,0.00020542525,0.0000542183,0.0000707424,0.006369688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9787385,0.010370304,0.0009921612,0.0019863786,0.006238978,0.0016737182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9296764,0.050149623,0.0037642017,0.008800907,0.005427845,0.0021810005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021264665,0.0004336003,0.001447273,0.0029668405,0.006923967,0.013317633,0.003003643,0.0073768157,0.0061614746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0826459,0.0009272785,0.0010268462,0.0044855834,0.042691387,0.022027928,0.007048938,0.011181984,0.000622598],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013467245,0.000012833535,0.00015424001,0.00001634383,0.0000035177568,0.000019956,0.00074809534,0.00023852919,0.0000273822,0.995353,0.001122607,0.0022900451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001628615,0.0000031597535,0.000120603414,0.00001508589,0.0000022431793,0.000019899519,0.00046389533,0.000509569,0.00003458966,0.99632156,0.0024842585,0.000008740733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028263787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030310366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021264665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052864114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004873794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1124596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W353587074","doi":"10.21991/c9t36q","title":"ON SENATE REFORM","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Advanced Mathematical Identities","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.07118986060672176,"score_gpt":0.3008038626989468,"score_spread":0.22961400209222504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W353587074","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012260129,0.010741657,0.0015523089,0.15086402,0.002630099,0.00004041032,0.00020159753,0.00003374345,0.8216761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48862538,0.012220519,0.0010383911,0.12858179,0.0055054924,0.0004031551,0.00024596337,0.00019459103,0.36318472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99051005,0.0046891742,0.00022865603,0.00067974016,0.0017792082,0.0021131905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99553394,0.0027400572,0.000215414,0.0004742935,0.00081785826,0.00021853307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067904433,0.0007114737,0.0012446874,0.0025987742,0.013286766,0.0071041533,0.0014648185,0.011749494,0.023020867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017092045,0.0005077457,0.0009215499,0.0031878261,0.0139498925,0.009896232,0.006957698,0.01241935,0.003952521],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015612753,0.00001583412,0.0000817072,0.00001743914,0.0000046774426,0.00004652957,0.0007433345,0.000065169384,0.000043500353,0.9428591,0.052379083,0.0037280358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003415765,0.000031622552,0.0012573928,0.00036660157,0.00002929736,0.000069006994,0.0020126193,0.00021251739,0.00040681195,0.41739762,0.578151,0.000031378946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030441154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04254661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030441154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006742971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063638603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07701248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W359069735","doi":"10.21991/c9rd5t","title":"THE PERSPECTIVES OF ABORIGINAL PEOPLES OF CANADA ON THE MONARCHY: REFLECTIONS ON THE OCCASION OF THE QUEEN’S GOLDEN JUBILEE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Monarchy; Federalism; Legislation; Queen (butterfly); Constitution; Treaty; Law; Political science; Constitutional monarchy; Variety (cybernetics); Politics","score_opus":0.031344353314173456,"score_gpt":0.29479694602134304,"score_spread":0.2634525927071696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W359069735","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23592171,0.034689747,0.00061330415,0.4328538,0.0030079333,0.000080235724,0.00037370468,0.000047255537,0.29241225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9024924,0.007484868,0.00031908063,0.031540718,0.00034662607,0.000034577406,0.0000619435,0.00007382475,0.057645947],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99231976,0.00161451,0.000078891746,0.00030144394,0.0013878541,0.0042975084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949674,0.0013617759,0.00018168245,0.00009402497,0.0012367432,0.0021583608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051307976,0.0005151427,0.00066771364,0.0017032122,0.08707306,0.017445123,0.0025842427,0.0067973547,0.006358321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005887939,0.00052650995,0.00056393485,0.0034316482,0.03582164,0.0034514416,0.0068981918,0.012804579,0.00038068483],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006412745,0.000029135323,0.0020041752,0.00011062197,0.00001734015,0.00096372946,0.7126426,0.00018633886,0.00031224996,0.1918916,0.08149417,0.010283856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011714434,0.000010873839,0.0043461127,0.00020911188,0.000014396554,0.00011145551,0.53110707,0.00007828462,0.00014185844,0.0063606417,0.45754713,0.00006132635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9947413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20974162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20974162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22631788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9165877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W365180183","doi":"10.21991/c9fd38","title":"THE SOUNDS OF SILENCE: CHARTER APPLICATION WHEN THE LEGISLATURE DECLINES TO SPEAK","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Silence; Legislature; Charter; Political science; History; Art; Law; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.032203052359005654,"score_gpt":0.23364087852474796,"score_spread":0.2014378261657423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W365180183","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056338098,0.0013218945,0.036233004,0.49332395,0.01506993,0.0005578596,0.00017177101,0.002813511,0.39416987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67548317,0.00082780974,0.015897175,0.1849424,0.006214906,0.0010318242,0.00021767522,0.0013554983,0.11402949],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95843846,0.017896868,0.0018053488,0.002546563,0.0122935595,0.007019163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9313408,0.04902808,0.0034268806,0.0027509697,0.007986432,0.005466828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027584689,0.00063124317,0.00084476755,0.0018389873,0.017078215,0.011970524,0.003267022,0.022467032,0.024174832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1432049,0.0008072374,0.0010490598,0.0010827462,0.008987786,0.00864849,0.008883887,0.01851049,0.0056104916],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002944369,0.0004985445,0.003646647,0.0001292541,0.00003710389,0.002802471,0.04944283,0.00064677483,0.0037541336,0.1953589,0.60748196,0.13590696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025492,0.0005046461,0.010522975,0.00094784395,0.00015293734,0.0011667567,0.07643441,0.0057739727,0.0055714836,0.12813653,0.7701227,0.00041089635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012886927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017679816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027584689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006337576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015508569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1458835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W36673133","doi":"10.21991/c9gd4z","title":"SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND THE SAME OLD CONSTITUTION*","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Politics; Law; Political science; Constitution; Political question; Institution; Same sex; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.03515265728374515,"score_gpt":0.26173373985162673,"score_spread":0.2265810825678816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W36673133","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017240118,0.008333376,0.0012035993,0.050725035,0.0015468115,0.00002378236,0.00019170511,0.000031688578,0.92070395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57486606,0.0047292775,0.0009526559,0.02631516,0.00058300316,0.00003540603,0.00021106095,0.000041196654,0.39226624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978951,0.00029131226,0.00003150959,0.0002014504,0.00065483345,0.00092573994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938226,0.00007630762,0.000035279394,0.0000754166,0.00028316837,0.00014758758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011598952,0.00023007307,0.00021678783,0.0005366678,0.009514565,0.004818178,0.0008094882,0.00215055,0.00936907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017769658,0.00013775784,0.00020252782,0.00080951327,0.0123249795,0.0014981776,0.001574403,0.004218337,0.0008896365],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059836907,0.00000603956,0.00032913315,0.000005419209,0.0000015739245,0.00005234608,0.0009965997,0.000027849408,0.00005787931,0.977344,0.016166694,0.005006497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010634965,0.000010429406,0.0054766913,0.0000957967,0.000008146828,0.00011699071,0.0020468317,0.00012817854,0.00019236135,0.094374746,0.8975211,0.000018196164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7394285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8745072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7394285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01844882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026912693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52421206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W36774033","doi":"10.21991/c9cw8c","title":"BRITAIN'S QUIET REVOLUTION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Indian History and Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"QUIET; History; Astronomy; Physics","score_opus":0.05219201986481358,"score_gpt":0.2081403837925656,"score_spread":0.15594836392775202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W36774033","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0823754,0.00851572,0.00047938013,0.22408977,0.0068240757,0.000039335584,0.00051899086,0.00014315176,0.6770142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4793131,0.0015978708,0.00018674403,0.0797244,0.0014149866,0.000049558326,0.00016994693,0.00014233532,0.437401],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99649906,0.00069300807,0.00008381205,0.00035763148,0.0009178466,0.0014485312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982759,0.00041552397,0.00008475553,0.0001779887,0.00028356872,0.0007623394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023584857,0.0003166554,0.00048886705,0.00080775144,0.009598041,0.0104211755,0.0007181533,0.007507383,0.023496922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054889177,0.00027131624,0.00033925087,0.0010167897,0.00793843,0.002479861,0.005285617,0.009188644,0.0045070257],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018969607,0.00007490703,0.0009866427,0.0001402435,0.000018055554,0.00069357967,0.012068135,0.00015868529,0.0010003881,0.5966429,0.36234218,0.025684506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004769632,0.0000349334,0.007026133,0.000109651075,0.000008265203,0.00006711605,0.00300007,0.00004233453,0.00018414024,0.024506658,0.96494895,0.000024039295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055545185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10760273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055545185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012708736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008934601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11044377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W369025018","doi":"10.21991/c93m2v","title":"SURPRISING AND DISTURBING? THE SASKATCHEWAN BOUNDARIES DECISION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Boundary (topology); Mathematics","score_opus":0.023266475210567874,"score_gpt":0.2619386591428764,"score_spread":0.23867218393230852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W369025018","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.106964946,0.004070076,0.0017249984,0.60088366,0.0022196171,0.000116106006,0.0007608281,0.00008513872,0.28317457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58919996,0.0020373808,0.0017858858,0.23750395,0.0002957662,0.00022550522,0.00028229048,0.00016804859,0.16850118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888659,0.0033359758,0.0003513882,0.0010424934,0.0022159873,0.0041882074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98540086,0.005975426,0.0005289052,0.0008635293,0.0034339228,0.0037973158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009362716,0.0005647735,0.0008311531,0.0015023785,0.021118483,0.017655436,0.002776562,0.009575557,0.015364858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022828285,0.0014403976,0.00096188666,0.0021970898,0.0135538345,0.005487117,0.0071516572,0.020172384,0.0014840518],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002100882,0.000078366065,0.0077889175,0.00008876431,0.00014280636,0.0012633543,0.0076895235,0.0011532492,0.0015243038,0.75000477,0.20672184,0.023334092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002844524,0.00008788476,0.033099987,0.0008066186,0.00020483491,0.00034550737,0.057725787,0.0011881767,0.0025382615,0.19617482,0.7068977,0.0006459278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9567021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9847666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93331647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06668356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20236361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4838254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3712173","doi":"10.21991/c96w96","title":"LIBERALISM, NATIONALISM, PLURALISM: POLITICAL REPRESENTATION AND NATION-BUILDING IN CANADA BEFORE AND AFTER THE QUEBEC REFERENDUM","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Nationalism; Pluralism (philosophy); Politics; Political science; Representation (politics); Liberalism; Political economy; Brexit; Sociology; Law; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; European union; International trade","score_opus":0.02369553933388606,"score_gpt":0.2420801501010491,"score_spread":0.21838461076716303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3712173","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87454593,0.0055366666,0.00032694428,0.045244392,0.00021770151,0.00004631081,0.0010624338,0.000023947725,0.07299561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9802885,0.0012160803,0.00015506442,0.0010068082,0.000021393736,0.000021406635,0.00019084623,0.000014274915,0.017085701],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99650985,0.00044723542,0.00006243043,0.0002282783,0.00077761203,0.0019744951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99299085,0.0014990101,0.0005825081,0.00015695317,0.0023890077,0.0023816575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026708308,0.0003020787,0.000797339,0.0028224383,0.030473892,0.011868842,0.0023049673,0.0025291485,0.010866653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067945453,0.0003258456,0.00065440557,0.007925436,0.011149102,0.0028200303,0.0039172582,0.004501883,0.00026812317],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048693243,0.0005973,0.24274282,0.00025371867,0.00022974958,0.00074674253,0.23563564,0.0028618088,0.00059253984,0.38569248,0.059672408,0.07048781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009569945,0.00006238719,0.58121216,0.0004864777,0.00016938812,0.00007238089,0.25645772,0.0016031571,0.0004957576,0.01465766,0.144447,0.00024025457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99936944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99974257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27035224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.27035224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2865799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84628797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W37987877","doi":"10.21991/c94m3j","title":"BLACK V. CHRÉTIEN AND THE CONTROL OF THE ROYAL PREROGATIVE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Bishops; Prerogative; Irish; Law; Political science; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02540320267826208,"score_gpt":0.25683856222810253,"score_spread":0.23143535954984046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W37987877","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023566768,0.013067098,0.0005319514,0.16599646,0.0016509485,0.000040821462,0.0000394039,0.000036798243,0.7950697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56442684,0.0032652498,0.00043946193,0.06923306,0.0009890153,0.000077011704,0.000019072259,0.00009079814,0.36145952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99290013,0.0023071023,0.00014394941,0.00080730085,0.0015255997,0.0023159222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941983,0.0035003552,0.00033738048,0.00030382766,0.00082108146,0.0008390079],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061107273,0.00028442222,0.0004932008,0.0007524327,0.021956015,0.00879388,0.0014808804,0.01086216,0.01416247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014093637,0.0005490659,0.00025052187,0.0007067106,0.020937555,0.004245268,0.0035136247,0.011718281,0.001717979],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003978597,0.00001801175,0.00019928817,0.000031717325,0.000004228202,0.00019036623,0.005542563,0.000078260215,0.00017877044,0.90915155,0.07798695,0.0065785362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051107963,0.000036996742,0.0016083515,0.00033176204,0.00001142769,0.00019851534,0.005620084,0.00019191395,0.0005225247,0.12160905,0.86973006,0.000088171924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20730847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31972298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20730847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01347694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018263899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4122036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W388776361","doi":"10.21991/c99w8r","title":"THE AUSTRALIAN REPUBLICAN MOVEMENT AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR CANADA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Movement (music); Political science; History; Geography; Art; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.036236142378415576,"score_gpt":0.2547005056571564,"score_spread":0.21846436327874083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W388776361","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06505145,0.013701538,0.00063788047,0.45068094,0.001549236,0.00006121556,0.00051986426,0.000049136226,0.46774876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7253554,0.011824761,0.0016223049,0.06916531,0.00045335136,0.000117768664,0.00018017874,0.000089599744,0.19119142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99293935,0.0010937534,0.00013322114,0.00039653035,0.0016822553,0.0037549583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916586,0.0022768015,0.00033532947,0.00024557172,0.0030182905,0.0024653054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004782028,0.00032336186,0.00079376844,0.0027527434,0.0404936,0.014794371,0.002749235,0.008036985,0.019136831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011256454,0.0005195329,0.0007367785,0.006007305,0.013885179,0.003633407,0.0055546113,0.010765975,0.0005973183],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000471638,0.0000320817,0.001918886,0.00009523916,0.000021376729,0.0002445411,0.009655508,0.00047008137,0.00014735448,0.87476265,0.09639013,0.016214931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057883502,0.000026538071,0.018214274,0.0005703735,0.00006783653,0.00009335257,0.031031067,0.0010364035,0.00024087694,0.105423376,0.8430359,0.0002021117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99557567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99705887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1672868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1672868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3332615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96582925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W396233616","doi":"10.21991/c9694f","title":"FEARFUL SYMMETRY: CONSTITUTIONAL UNIFORMITY AND THE FEDERAL AMENDMENT PROPOSALS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Amendment; Constitutional amendment; Symmetry (geometry); Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Psychology; Physics; Politics; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.02920906674593668,"score_gpt":0.2743407333723122,"score_spread":0.2451316666263755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W396233616","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16694401,0.0038004615,0.067749955,0.23394363,0.0015612635,0.00037336632,0.00025984208,0.00010412548,0.52526337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98113006,0.0004680374,0.0036518762,0.0053970637,0.00075791084,0.00021259916,0.000037376612,0.0000259918,0.00831913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.970036,0.019195037,0.0010502626,0.001964774,0.0042098816,0.0035441562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93238115,0.051958628,0.0052868263,0.0057347137,0.0029741148,0.0016646512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042823352,0.00050820905,0.0015041707,0.0020820007,0.008346601,0.011522653,0.0027419457,0.012989453,0.009593632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10599439,0.0007807974,0.001991591,0.0023104413,0.03558864,0.020069584,0.007982273,0.015953708,0.0005865596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021497008,0.000011597564,0.00007996086,0.0000066959915,0.0000035799521,0.000015897269,0.00020085716,0.00018312145,0.000024311772,0.9977291,0.00067447743,0.0010488634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037590857,0.000008133594,0.00012980458,0.00001066194,0.000006596409,0.000011494515,0.00016503753,0.00041237,0.00007459725,0.99688405,0.0022502274,0.000009404823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006343915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050725304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042823352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008103345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01205672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22647429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W406720517","doi":"10.21991/c9qd5h","title":"RECONCILING DUALITY AND DIVERSITY/ DUALITÉ ET DIVERSITÉ SONT-ELLES CONCILIABLES?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Duality (order theory); Humility; Madam; Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Theology; Mathematics; Anthropology; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.05614080555742295,"score_gpt":0.2528876229797651,"score_spread":0.19674681742234212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W406720517","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27491954,0.024246948,0.008599435,0.19109368,0.0009517386,0.000048332167,0.00019937125,0.00009196165,0.49984914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899828,0.0015621195,0.00071105856,0.0010535175,0.000072257986,0.00000930916,0.000024372388,0.000021794493,0.006562878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960841,0.0017276441,0.000052853306,0.00029618925,0.00056767114,0.0012714624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966011,0.0010009243,0.00041633807,0.00035023876,0.0008553978,0.0007760059],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051775216,0.00045002592,0.0007405801,0.002733026,0.010674927,0.01607349,0.0015152609,0.0021240038,0.0066762636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007881217,0.00022740105,0.00026922647,0.003521805,0.05611604,0.014477377,0.0074362596,0.0039032102,0.00040782397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024933706,0.0000143298075,0.0034027307,0.000037204016,0.000013404037,0.00009847826,0.040314026,0.00007628448,0.00013009734,0.93661934,0.0032016858,0.016067583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002108535,0.000018876051,0.0101870615,0.00048164907,0.00003623112,0.00022221604,0.2906183,0.0004761505,0.00034760102,0.53892297,0.1585983,0.00006949541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44353417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6076155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55646586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034384187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03086916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.881905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W419179756","doi":"10.21991/c99m1b","title":"CANADA'S JUDGE BORK: HAS THE COUNTER-REVOLUTION BEGUN?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.03158940162867509,"score_gpt":0.21889991255886365,"score_spread":0.18731051093018858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W419179756","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009673996,0.0093984185,0.00012729251,0.907704,0.0031831423,0.000022300228,0.00041185474,0.000027842896,0.0694512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2949006,0.010897613,0.00062981853,0.5557338,0.0020291908,0.000065860964,0.0003276855,0.00017634452,0.13523914],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877807,0.0011625736,0.00019213397,0.0007482825,0.0038403827,0.0062759495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875733,0.0023173115,0.00047232638,0.00021823848,0.0048982245,0.0045206035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007087521,0.00060695957,0.0011206735,0.0021783672,0.042442866,0.02214043,0.0033968224,0.028776722,0.022820527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021047052,0.00066269963,0.0008597522,0.0039420202,0.019646391,0.0087676225,0.00542175,0.02501832,0.0014559459],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006717863,0.00004228713,0.0018793419,0.00012483464,0.000031448602,0.00033921355,0.0077151144,0.00014942758,0.00017973014,0.24305816,0.73435867,0.012054527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007109811,0.000012674456,0.0073386286,0.00039620887,0.000059372524,0.000059412287,0.023515727,0.00017583062,0.00026675334,0.018532332,0.9493968,0.00017521127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9945911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99673223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19071941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19071941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.42919213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9386508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W419620066","doi":"10.21991/c9qh2d","title":"ALBERTA'S SEAT BELT LAW REINSTATED","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Seat belt; Law; Political science; Engineering; Automotive engineering","score_opus":0.03154853937705836,"score_gpt":0.26495808000631704,"score_spread":0.23340954062925867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W419620066","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056952816,0.0037650876,0.002999477,0.086516716,0.011377573,0.00083165715,0.0053803907,0.0012646149,0.8309117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.082702875,0.00079769787,0.002133118,0.039967652,0.0004324502,0.00014753042,0.0011817442,0.00011781403,0.8725191],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9838733,0.0005395914,0.0005253193,0.0012062135,0.008427736,0.0054277955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931231,0.0008119432,0.00013022771,0.0005268371,0.0044257324,0.0009821795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006699235,0.000860628,0.0011001702,0.002838667,0.013711418,0.012180258,0.006933176,0.01814724,0.015517475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011710491,0.0018290761,0.0017470572,0.0022145577,0.00379511,0.0014821367,0.004001219,0.015797174,0.002512118],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018892919,0.0002768096,0.0059132567,0.00018967768,0.00011758445,0.0016511284,0.0032832443,0.0027584205,0.0026997498,0.3314818,0.6147419,0.03669741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014096328,0.00005229543,0.021766836,0.00019394231,0.00011804506,0.00011039577,0.0010893666,0.00088694924,0.0013201213,0.006695823,0.9674759,0.0001494431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9831481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9907849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07826346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07826346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26689824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5678438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205435105","doi":"10.21991/c94h24","title":"COMMENTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.05338444324577618,"score_gpt":0.2600943855705252,"score_spread":0.20670994232474904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205435105","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00062206556,0.000960343,0.00022438912,0.7843952,0.17145067,0.00017868973,0.001536617,0.00041068447,0.040221337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0033302126,0.00052060606,0.00020558925,0.8558737,0.03741159,0.00025709686,0.00050622143,0.00016279152,0.101732194],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887621,0.0016268637,0.00089211884,0.0011828323,0.0056967214,0.0018392846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9598781,0.014230813,0.0024907254,0.0016960683,0.018568853,0.0031353757],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007522533,0.0010469521,0.001279132,0.0022033083,0.0053494764,0.0052300347,0.0043653552,0.03299572,0.1675452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08588381,0.0008097154,0.0024772862,0.001538725,0.002517799,0.0028223982,0.0041395924,0.015953485,0.109367],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016708496,0.000003962909,0.00006538553,0.000035407797,0.0000025127158,0.00008901774,0.000045008903,0.000007434012,0.000027232167,0.00028938535,0.9983607,0.0010573866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044844845,0.000010118937,0.0004271878,0.00020430048,0.000011510795,0.000110232555,0.000327234,0.000035584777,0.00012153749,0.00065073447,0.99803704,0.000019732852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0112620685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012974728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8324548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006049526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006802614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206248230","doi":"10.21991/c9qx0s","title":"CONSTITUTIONAL DIALOGUES BETWEEN COURTS AND LEGISLATURES: CAN WE TALK?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Democracy; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.05817665794960814,"score_gpt":0.2739440819670126,"score_spread":0.21576742401740445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206248230","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01268,0.038023733,0.014515124,0.74732643,0.0039346716,0.00004837832,0.00012757142,0.00012172484,0.1832223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85108614,0.024019737,0.0066820476,0.08817439,0.0070604696,0.0002686263,0.00014642837,0.00030654116,0.022255681],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9446834,0.045188606,0.00075816485,0.0020522035,0.004349799,0.002967901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94669056,0.043202706,0.002752732,0.0021452173,0.0025323287,0.002676392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03222701,0.0007421845,0.0011658347,0.0037870295,0.019533109,0.029776,0.003572038,0.015023855,0.017008271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06670661,0.00080122607,0.0008056559,0.004254363,0.05563354,0.06256388,0.010473444,0.020097014,0.0026063763],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013929066,0.000016696655,0.00033051576,0.0001074415,0.000011491671,0.00009309369,0.037146986,0.000062060324,0.000047194866,0.9354483,0.018238032,0.008484211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025914276,0.000018803496,0.0006098105,0.00089845114,0.00001362085,0.00012023826,0.053382844,0.00019969494,0.00013931318,0.70845604,0.23609649,0.00003875585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00605384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062566125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03222701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010047103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008510462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17043477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213032521","doi":"10.21991/c91t0j","title":"UNDERSTANDING INEQUALITY: A REPLY TO DALE GIBSON","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Sociology; Mathematical economics; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Economics; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.18947745164623675,"score_gpt":0.33027892637754813,"score_spread":0.14080147473131138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213032521","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010019408,0.002904182,0.000096386764,0.99195427,0.003999617,0.0000020856025,0.000009997527,0.0000033354704,0.0009299947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0075721974,0.0027440772,0.00030377627,0.97354954,0.012811437,0.00003730891,0.000015551881,0.000036143003,0.0029300624],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98376393,0.0074124555,0.0010912877,0.0026020005,0.0037823517,0.0013480599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9363147,0.05056359,0.001292594,0.0017584526,0.0059583583,0.0041123275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023039863,0.0014241041,0.0038798428,0.002455553,0.012638805,0.013261908,0.0046583456,0.059614506,0.008224452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0746263,0.0013764545,0.0017454372,0.0030364997,0.03416733,0.030467067,0.012694259,0.10197805,0.0023610597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037574693,0.00003221937,0.00018621808,0.00011922153,0.00002191102,0.000089004665,0.0040691015,0.000075853604,0.00005462504,0.10707495,0.88287455,0.005364861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010301867,0.000019700798,0.00052113755,0.00081528217,0.000039348444,0.00013225399,0.006402489,0.00015839512,0.00014300775,0.17831278,0.8132113,0.0001412829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03155999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031784087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059614506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0094049005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013660291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12184787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225120294","doi":"10.21991/cf29438","title":"Minority Language School Boards and Personal Federalism in Canada — Recent and Ongoing Developments in Quebec","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Healthcare Systems and Practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Charter; Constitution; Law; Political science; State (computer science); Promotion (chess); Supreme court; Section (typography); Federalism; Constitutional right; Public administration; Sociology; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.039730205346704045,"score_gpt":0.35490330680627397,"score_spread":0.3151731014595699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225120294","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3082044,0.0411018,0.0012002828,0.3545892,0.0015236879,0.00020016993,0.0021186504,0.00020632024,0.29085553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.869263,0.008562087,0.0011881817,0.022177458,0.0002735404,0.00007077382,0.0005344161,0.000054614924,0.09787586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951788,0.0005448578,0.000091182264,0.00038247235,0.0013442859,0.0024584031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915053,0.0010878737,0.0005257893,0.00023346426,0.00239942,0.0042482163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003865772,0.000285823,0.00040573484,0.002137356,0.02074354,0.009524001,0.0030386064,0.0029995434,0.016165996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052500456,0.00045633744,0.00047479995,0.004000356,0.0074005793,0.0022605988,0.002598559,0.0036509964,0.0004409031],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022311094,0.0003306236,0.06107226,0.00038278208,0.000078964884,0.0009282079,0.01857529,0.0019200807,0.000823899,0.5905682,0.19079569,0.13430083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011036213,0.00008627458,0.19359396,0.0007823478,0.00006244131,0.00017811674,0.022092741,0.002119229,0.0005640368,0.010734133,0.76952386,0.00015251384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9985852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99926466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2658887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2658887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30795628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85146505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225138630","doi":"10.21991/cf29436","title":"Covid, Courts, Communists and Common Sense","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Communism; Criticism; China; Political science; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Law; Public administration; Medicine","score_opus":0.019836790285358893,"score_gpt":0.26260559972081715,"score_spread":0.24276880943545825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225138630","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01821354,0.009363468,0.004179694,0.1479987,0.0014770846,0.000036880425,0.000068074696,0.00012220803,0.8185404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8406974,0.003607815,0.0010492369,0.025083173,0.0011568681,0.000107566404,0.000067396715,0.000107839616,0.12812284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98869914,0.0046712635,0.0003847375,0.0015584285,0.0023315845,0.0023549662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987339,0.0071314247,0.0010510528,0.001347222,0.0011494216,0.0019818204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009059677,0.00045502497,0.0005699671,0.003029819,0.024104,0.031646475,0.0015147121,0.01045014,0.018199455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017978707,0.0005598267,0.0002773455,0.0040017907,0.064898334,0.019665448,0.01329885,0.011978727,0.001457832],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032733722,0.0000043411483,0.00016537687,0.000010645794,0.0000014762365,0.000039587285,0.006099913,0.000021680706,0.000018056819,0.96934825,0.019858988,0.0044282856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000133136455,0.000010488419,0.0006167806,0.00023159423,0.0000043269724,0.00009176819,0.020075858,0.00015752907,0.00007818285,0.4640403,0.5146552,0.000024574265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033106096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036667533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033106096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012563647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010694862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.091156065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225165251","doi":"10.21991/cf29437","title":"Mandatory Covid-19 Vaccinations and the Charter","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vaccination; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Charter; Political science; Guardian; Medicine; Virology; Law","score_opus":0.021665541808261683,"score_gpt":0.29320030766476407,"score_spread":0.2715347658565024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225165251","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029469986,0.009962633,0.0027410819,0.6626455,0.018261032,0.00030501126,0.0051954845,0.0006967513,0.2707225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40973964,0.009150336,0.005784413,0.36334598,0.0074290265,0.00034747773,0.00677135,0.0005513015,0.19688052],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9846758,0.0020827104,0.00049109984,0.0014347093,0.0068778098,0.0044378536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97777224,0.005322518,0.0023893996,0.0015337316,0.0066254423,0.006356659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016608162,0.00041894743,0.0003342375,0.0009633445,0.007395197,0.009475485,0.0022916673,0.0052223224,0.019213518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035964146,0.0005317995,0.00048437694,0.0012444822,0.0051908824,0.0046931016,0.0036296146,0.01018253,0.0026317239],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008148935,0.000048015947,0.004270688,0.000112025846,0.0000064211786,0.00009652159,0.0013581429,0.00013311674,0.00017340135,0.069075875,0.8847486,0.03989572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047556954,0.000079274854,0.016122231,0.00037087972,0.0000117179015,0.0000965951,0.0013359739,0.00020216223,0.00031068453,0.0053329854,0.97602886,0.00006104489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.65264004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70514977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65264004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021514148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.057537634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69881123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229666626","doi":"10.21991/cf29371","title":"De facto and de jure Crown Sovereignty: Reconciliation and Legitimation at the Supreme Court of Canada Ryan","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Law; Supreme court; Legitimacy; Political science; Legitimation; De facto; Crown (dentistry); Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.014237891509047631,"score_gpt":0.2509128879879251,"score_spread":0.23667499647887746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229666626","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0821342,0.009888867,0.010625907,0.16010806,0.00090152177,0.00008976774,0.00035365514,0.000105008985,0.73579305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9569208,0.0014591054,0.0019420345,0.006356667,0.00021780294,0.00003246116,0.000059627546,0.00005122779,0.032960325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876667,0.0021428564,0.0002616351,0.0013375476,0.005020503,0.0035707075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99091816,0.0039275694,0.00031715515,0.0006433595,0.0033644014,0.00082929025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009184286,0.00032404638,0.000773155,0.002459834,0.026929345,0.02158644,0.0028406316,0.0087397145,0.00551143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019025594,0.0004818759,0.0004374234,0.0032423814,0.040870737,0.005522575,0.0057333987,0.011793638,0.00032639096],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034223588,0.000002591272,0.00021923598,0.0000055059963,0.0000042801403,0.000048804508,0.0027630748,0.00012098047,0.000029067753,0.99001735,0.00477366,0.0020120787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035683748,0.00001035686,0.003351534,0.000247785,0.00005743474,0.000070248745,0.009065613,0.001803216,0.00052499375,0.7149561,0.26975706,0.00011996564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.940161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94840425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10572848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10572848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12624617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7671174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229767047","doi":"10.21991/c9p387","title":"McIvor v Canada and the 2010 Amendments to the Indian Act: A Half-Hearted Rememdy to Historical Injustice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Injustice; Fell; Government (linguistics); Law; Political science; Section (typography); Bill of rights; History; Geography; Human rights; Business; Philosophy; Cartography","score_opus":0.02528612958128768,"score_gpt":0.27514937967194986,"score_spread":0.24986325009066218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229767047","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056381192,0.015331913,0.0009010247,0.2534498,0.0015425914,0.00006514291,0.00063273293,0.00007551997,0.67162013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63573337,0.0063441475,0.00086179376,0.106406555,0.00048315467,0.00006238902,0.00022601873,0.00010055264,0.24978207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99458873,0.0006768189,0.00009715155,0.00044654545,0.0022037185,0.0019871008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968541,0.0009931697,0.00021140804,0.00017585796,0.0011012695,0.00066422997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023986045,0.0003183408,0.00028634968,0.0014007197,0.029980613,0.009581135,0.0017394784,0.008160018,0.0061724107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006453637,0.0004127157,0.00042043533,0.0019035246,0.021252127,0.0023020883,0.0028062514,0.009932559,0.00040387292],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029815248,0.000014267541,0.001182205,0.000045008434,0.000007904964,0.00042409776,0.015726052,0.00015065252,0.00017925646,0.83432,0.13805504,0.009865807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018132278,0.000012473737,0.007389705,0.00028907222,0.000021474967,0.00015529082,0.012481669,0.00017637463,0.000398354,0.024324026,0.9546457,0.00008791017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9920923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.103769444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.103769444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1398266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7529035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231168347","doi":"10.21991/c9jd5z","title":"Introduction","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Downtown; Context (archaeology); Politics; Public administration; Political science; Community organizing; Harm; Poverty; Sociology; Criminology; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.016888417376633436,"score_gpt":0.2880593842486444,"score_spread":0.271170966872011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231168347","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030511518,0.0019371303,0.0013004397,0.013592297,0.0036907336,0.000099974444,0.0016182213,0.00026879198,0.97444123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01532223,0.0013263508,0.00081803894,0.0053707096,0.00038429926,0.000049461676,0.0011838515,0.00014525789,0.9753997],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982589,0.00016399247,0.000052071664,0.00033438133,0.00076094276,0.00042974038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997929,0.00014572547,0.00005588869,0.00016818581,0.0010723865,0.0006288473],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010528318,0.00054412277,0.00040482613,0.0011127071,0.0072483933,0.0076886076,0.001696878,0.0031322292,0.32325506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035818713,0.00027031213,0.0003848031,0.0014412838,0.0017255298,0.0021659178,0.0035528315,0.0028057178,0.1366858],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000353432,0.000039390947,0.0019605232,0.00017057256,0.0000049458486,0.00037411315,0.0030362988,0.00006982328,0.0003418302,0.060452092,0.80742556,0.12608948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013937853,0.0000034572397,0.0005630586,0.00006785561,8.854623e-7,0.00007232511,0.0007444354,0.000009962554,0.000045557317,0.0010699484,0.9974178,0.000003308417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12896885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27629173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67674494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006907386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010632337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96529454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231312295","doi":"10.21991/c9mm48","title":"Editor's Note","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Cases and Commentary","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.017362347541542495,"score_gpt":0.29774056718988806,"score_spread":0.2803782196483456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231312295","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007118623,0.0009869582,0.00013731494,0.34717417,0.6490464,0.000029369365,0.00011270449,0.00007467086,0.002367303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012787888,0.0013952432,0.000517607,0.5604559,0.41558903,0.00009187736,0.00005838037,0.000092150796,0.020521063],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892468,0.0013903556,0.0012787422,0.001586137,0.005461998,0.0010359581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94391173,0.01797381,0.0033633052,0.0017327827,0.028387528,0.0046307812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0099823065,0.0018633957,0.0027909745,0.00200821,0.0054761884,0.00918479,0.005605205,0.024992798,0.021023093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09236107,0.0012635135,0.0029283715,0.0016020553,0.0031655605,0.005535593,0.0028768883,0.03660297,0.018180395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000803439,0.0000054495454,0.00003328828,0.00003375183,0.0000039625647,0.0000906801,0.0000184645,0.000008205724,0.000019331743,0.00023592492,0.99806935,0.0014736607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025282561,0.0000146345865,0.00026991658,0.0002730199,0.000018879846,0.00025908137,0.00011294888,0.00009059794,0.00015012207,0.0009809253,0.99777204,0.000032528125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005606893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014397539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024992798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034718583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012443758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07032925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232399982","doi":"10.21991/c9gt0k","title":"COMMENTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.05338444324577618,"score_gpt":0.2600943855705252,"score_spread":0.20670994232474904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232399982","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006220665,0.0009603445,0.00022438943,0.78439486,0.17145093,0.0001786898,0.0015366201,0.0004106843,0.04022149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003330219,0.0005206069,0.00020558917,0.85587335,0.037411593,0.000257097,0.0005062227,0.00016279193,0.10173255],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887621,0.0016268637,0.00089211715,0.0011828305,0.0056967163,0.0018392812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9598782,0.014230793,0.002490721,0.0016960662,0.018568855,0.00313537],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007522526,0.0010469501,0.0012791309,0.0022033069,0.005349464,0.0052300273,0.004365351,0.032995638,0.16754542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.085883655,0.00080971426,0.002477279,0.0015387235,0.002517794,0.0028223954,0.004139588,0.015953453,0.10936704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016708433,0.0000039628976,0.00006538534,0.000035407764,0.0000025127063,0.000089017485,0.000045008816,0.0000074339837,0.000027232116,0.0002893848,0.9983607,0.0010573856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044844634,0.000010118898,0.00042718736,0.00020430009,0.000011510752,0.000110232235,0.0003272334,0.000035584642,0.00012153725,0.0006507329,0.99803704,0.000019732779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011262059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01297471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83245456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060495203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068026013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232791347","doi":"10.21991/c9nh2s","title":"COMMENTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.05338444324577618,"score_gpt":0.2600943855705252,"score_spread":0.20670994232474904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232791347","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006220665,0.0009603445,0.00022438943,0.78439486,0.17145093,0.0001786898,0.0015366201,0.0004106843,0.04022149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003330219,0.0005206069,0.00020558917,0.85587335,0.037411593,0.000257097,0.0005062227,0.00016279193,0.10173255],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887621,0.0016268637,0.00089211715,0.0011828305,0.0056967163,0.0018392812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9598782,0.014230793,0.002490721,0.0016960662,0.018568855,0.00313537],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007522526,0.0010469501,0.0012791309,0.0022033069,0.005349464,0.0052300273,0.004365351,0.032995638,0.16754542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.085883655,0.00080971426,0.002477279,0.0015387235,0.002517794,0.0028223954,0.004139588,0.015953453,0.10936704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016708433,0.0000039628976,0.00006538534,0.000035407764,0.0000025127063,0.000089017485,0.000045008816,0.0000074339837,0.000027232116,0.0002893848,0.9983607,0.0010573856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044844634,0.000010118898,0.00042718736,0.00020430009,0.000011510752,0.000110232235,0.0003272334,0.000035584642,0.00012153725,0.0006507329,0.99803704,0.000019732779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011262059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01297471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83245456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060495203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068026013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234271340","doi":"10.21991/c9mh2g","title":"OBSERVATIONS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.09251040770982182,"score_gpt":0.25830318895183024,"score_spread":0.1657927812420084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234271340","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15148486,0.00053640374,0.0014588928,0.029100992,0.0006288128,0.00037368992,0.03237335,0.0005930074,0.78344995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5905524,0.0006815803,0.0006055144,0.009647974,0.00068669143,0.00039752547,0.012913664,0.00031104858,0.3842036],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810165,0.0001786388,0.000069022826,0.00037917637,0.0008838326,0.00038768916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99306446,0.0026023819,0.0013149397,0.0010167047,0.0014529199,0.0005485836],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010957291,0.00033366852,0.00024220675,0.0013402579,0.0027064313,0.0016771004,0.0010636294,0.0011145911,0.14920051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010297792,0.00017716493,0.00024807843,0.0019895476,0.0013586235,0.0015012195,0.0016816044,0.0023127494,0.0297593],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018461529,0.00046137208,0.077763975,0.0007780792,0.000043218977,0.0014906866,0.034996133,0.00072765915,0.0040765973,0.058867395,0.75317764,0.06577102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010237829,0.00011039738,0.18045966,0.00032946095,0.000024442108,0.00045898368,0.047684986,0.00024644914,0.0036592989,0.009112677,0.75776684,0.000044361543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049525876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040357184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8507995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017546152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019196485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49912542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234917865","doi":"10.21991/cf29370","title":"Wahkohtowin in Action","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metis; Indigenous; Law; Commission; Action (physics); Political science; Work (physics); Sociology; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.03714303502622718,"score_gpt":0.318395759727178,"score_spread":0.2812527247009508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234917865","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058081318,0.0010898935,0.006211628,0.028864726,0.0010229656,0.00034195115,0.00017747335,0.00021810448,0.9039919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4763479,0.0005853369,0.008787149,0.0058179097,0.000033253495,0.00026450868,0.00010789535,0.00007829696,0.50797784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841416,0.00031263658,0.000041839285,0.00031258052,0.00036866724,0.00055000716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992537,0.00011875633,0.00003965979,0.00009204211,0.00016670949,0.00032911386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019909826,0.00034857666,0.00020436052,0.00062118826,0.010778424,0.0046470813,0.0009370807,0.0020045731,0.023648039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021727425,0.00021423248,0.00021642103,0.0005485088,0.0061465516,0.0027003607,0.0055429917,0.0024555998,0.001930418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006172793,0.0001102657,0.0036465444,0.00016069211,0.000009930985,0.000834649,0.06312163,0.00022750827,0.0019077975,0.7486032,0.08120033,0.10011565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009319668,0.000017891945,0.0027127266,0.00016756367,0.000010058279,0.0001245319,0.03126185,0.00024946232,0.0007347333,0.026091391,0.93859285,0.000027528284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30239046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.555779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30239046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00843366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025420118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60126066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235167399","doi":"10.21991/cf29417","title":"Introduction","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.026382444784000644,"score_gpt":0.3017124128306336,"score_spread":0.27532996804663296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235167399","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009937964,0.011356966,0.003166219,0.072644494,0.13996054,0.00026149175,0.009430685,0.0012463633,0.7609395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006869709,0.0074120373,0.0017291253,0.023418128,0.035786886,0.00022856244,0.008552566,0.0007965131,0.9152065],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770194,0.00031937845,0.00012269389,0.00046718324,0.0011072875,0.00028145994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951357,0.00091830536,0.00023607987,0.0004725717,0.0022103242,0.0010270677],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002043381,0.00095286284,0.0007131334,0.001801255,0.00202392,0.0072214664,0.0019789962,0.0037245776,0.55588454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010853603,0.00029880108,0.00064313953,0.0015023414,0.0009294567,0.0042928606,0.0031029552,0.0030510314,0.33915925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001565321,0.000011898788,0.000103567974,0.000095614596,0.0000016542556,0.000024723518,0.00006762635,0.000023432593,0.0000783503,0.006353111,0.95697266,0.03625156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019624151,0.0000053251665,0.00012974236,0.00007538624,8.014185e-7,0.000022496142,0.000043015276,0.000008679912,0.000019860123,0.0014721188,0.9982181,0.0000026174105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024595417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032607103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55588454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019412921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004006467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6334768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235208127","doi":"10.21991/c9jt2z","title":"Introduction","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; State (computer science); Democratic governance; Law; Liberal democracy; Public administration; Library science; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.015728353114768594,"score_gpt":0.2691221745480333,"score_spread":0.25339382143326467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235208127","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010478336,0.011813261,0.0021514148,0.08622118,0.14192666,0.00019680665,0.008112153,0.00088676956,0.7476439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007152515,0.0063216933,0.0012460178,0.01631447,0.025147082,0.00013406221,0.006181043,0.0006102169,0.936893],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784625,0.00024543016,0.000098620476,0.00038237052,0.0011045124,0.00032291326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99532205,0.0006869954,0.00017053731,0.00046006363,0.0024069925,0.0009534131],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016870525,0.00075628975,0.0006505992,0.0018535252,0.0034802957,0.0073791873,0.0018270834,0.003385778,0.4344665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0084364675,0.00029669222,0.00059237785,0.0021349795,0.0011456618,0.0040659728,0.0031561507,0.0028964807,0.19116037],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009151496,0.0000068006193,0.000086050044,0.00006527981,0.0000012148895,0.000017022552,0.00010010349,0.000017761748,0.000058391688,0.0074363053,0.9689965,0.023205295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011073097,0.0000023221687,0.00010885468,0.000043518558,5.5846493e-7,0.000011506674,0.000053919823,0.00000663757,0.0000134751745,0.00071661186,0.99903935,0.0000020825119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016001089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026587328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5655335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003981807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073823165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8066649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235632106","doi":"10.21991/c9r95s","title":"Table of Contents","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Table (database); Database; Computer science","score_opus":0.05834233120001017,"score_gpt":0.2357391205611144,"score_spread":0.17739678936110423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235632106","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005358083,0.005079542,0.0013278043,0.007687275,0.041859973,0.0009679671,0.07380171,0.0022169491,0.86652297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014422893,0.0024167371,0.0007936485,0.0024684302,0.0104608815,0.00038755272,0.022821808,0.000886769,0.95832187],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918586,0.00008235585,0.00004054685,0.00011099442,0.0005005853,0.00007968315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99446446,0.0009582234,0.00026567344,0.0002848268,0.0029727651,0.0010540447],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089649286,0.00093785464,0.0012035106,0.0063134255,0.0017619344,0.005466933,0.0014973461,0.0016014789,0.856337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073052705,0.00048197512,0.0006977128,0.004730798,0.00032952728,0.0022356734,0.0018430654,0.0013704395,0.7427056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013692426,0.000021901542,0.000047298578,0.00013034174,0.0000017676589,0.000011315741,0.0000042990114,0.000032524084,0.00005429489,0.0003624587,0.9800009,0.019319203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015863308,0.000013150029,0.00048453687,0.00018238326,0.000003967465,0.000021362239,0.000023192031,0.000043277498,0.000086450105,0.0008814409,0.99823785,0.000006495901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030527955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063569797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14366299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017293429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028902695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20491785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235854323","doi":"10.21991/c9kq27","title":"Introduction","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.01920544657048155,"score_gpt":0.26909396137106384,"score_spread":0.2498885148005823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235854323","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013290856,0.009257914,0.0036695076,0.07521252,0.090162255,0.00018807632,0.00762896,0.0011148814,0.8114368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008513017,0.004919369,0.0016545091,0.017656744,0.022015613,0.00015283863,0.005498456,0.0005999628,0.9389896],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980075,0.00029146485,0.00009612416,0.00046626612,0.00089197175,0.00024679114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99617225,0.0007589569,0.00021157978,0.0004081217,0.0017099247,0.00073915964],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017705365,0.00078333274,0.0005976497,0.0016135367,0.002285183,0.0070760264,0.001799884,0.003504977,0.4929369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00886152,0.00027464287,0.000570194,0.0015797429,0.0009771711,0.0042076525,0.003149973,0.0029838644,0.28850085],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021033573,0.000013680465,0.0001671751,0.000112295565,0.0000020236848,0.000030571988,0.00015755832,0.000029450379,0.00011254816,0.016521418,0.940822,0.042010207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001636078,0.000004765176,0.00014827139,0.000059117432,7.3594094e-7,0.000019787947,0.00006732392,0.000010459326,0.000024744066,0.0018808377,0.99777967,0.0000026353575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025710675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034041072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4929369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018461049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002874479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.723264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238087880","doi":"10.21991/c9794r","title":"R. V. SEABOYER: PORNOGRAPHIC IMAGINATION AND THE SPRINGS OF RELEVANCE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Aesthetics; Art; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.02467236495083473,"score_gpt":0.2701359993706279,"score_spread":0.24546363441979316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238087880","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013706259,0.09726061,0.003540835,0.7059127,0.0056968303,0.00002407466,0.00006945689,0.000067650464,0.17372154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76391596,0.050182562,0.0026393905,0.09738506,0.0060396898,0.00008124834,0.000051100575,0.00020340669,0.07950161],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99690574,0.0020940315,0.00008269517,0.00031329488,0.00040493868,0.00019931447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99576485,0.003080023,0.00034680043,0.00019370655,0.0003890335,0.00022557785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00425743,0.0005406141,0.0004991143,0.0009628307,0.0062983776,0.009722703,0.0013623124,0.010808559,0.007142018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011051686,0.00035316343,0.00032837444,0.0016826519,0.018011065,0.012967115,0.0037343518,0.008517075,0.0011361277],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042666223,0.000015640635,0.0002695596,0.0000982943,0.00000779644,0.0002474975,0.01880713,0.00014403478,0.00008624085,0.8515407,0.11906545,0.009675019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003109982,0.000027970158,0.0011734504,0.0006966601,0.0000093597555,0.00029611186,0.021743404,0.00032889037,0.0003527351,0.3846266,0.59066534,0.000048470352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0129583655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012458966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0129583655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035916497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032413446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02605939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239763295","doi":"10.21991/c9v37d","title":"INTRODUCTION","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025015153637015806,"score_gpt":0.22426510482315348,"score_spread":0.19924995118613767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239763295","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004461502,0.003064568,0.0020210359,0.01811752,0.0036835803,0.00019782591,0.004819486,0.00044424194,0.96319026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025152156,0.0016881146,0.0015990934,0.0044745603,0.00042673104,0.00009939101,0.003108675,0.00017279797,0.96327853],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967822,0.00025324544,0.00007688685,0.00054284756,0.0015480487,0.0007968064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99660987,0.00022580546,0.00008569488,0.00024587064,0.0020259551,0.00080680166],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021484944,0.000575098,0.0004717734,0.0017526661,0.006756001,0.0071339714,0.0023591958,0.0025965886,0.30055103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005142416,0.00028038683,0.0004955239,0.0025893014,0.002161312,0.0021506278,0.0031856422,0.0021921885,0.093150966],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006983309,0.00004253815,0.0030610126,0.00021117953,0.0000074669138,0.00020772337,0.0034478586,0.00013963814,0.00038393697,0.15914297,0.716628,0.11665797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022482145,0.000004842829,0.001333209,0.000082653976,0.0000017229836,0.000029973651,0.00076599256,0.000015042261,0.000053671753,0.001624349,0.9960813,0.0000049916794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47464392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57603145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52535605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019418584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035174772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99767905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241459668","doi":"10.21991/c9nt04","title":"Introduction","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Constitutional law; Sociology","score_opus":0.0167153703095397,"score_gpt":0.2599391723198297,"score_spread":0.24322380201029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241459668","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014465479,0.003950703,0.0024191537,0.023413392,0.009706312,0.00017912772,0.004169896,0.0005215721,0.9541934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012705297,0.003284473,0.0020121045,0.009323307,0.00212157,0.00014739625,0.003768692,0.00030222238,0.966335],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770087,0.00030441082,0.00009532264,0.0005160667,0.0010411132,0.00034221358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99746776,0.0003525139,0.00009531418,0.00028418403,0.0013396414,0.00046056413],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019957826,0.0006641893,0.00050089444,0.001487533,0.0038896608,0.007169014,0.0021189023,0.0034151864,0.41903496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006758158,0.00031027192,0.00060344563,0.0017982492,0.0015389345,0.0038154144,0.0036966004,0.0031069221,0.2115697],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003907119,0.000030362235,0.00058493303,0.00015420846,0.0000032587236,0.00010596168,0.001016958,0.00006953372,0.00015126778,0.08861753,0.8231649,0.086062096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016508114,0.0000051938823,0.0002446111,0.00006974887,7.0707193e-7,0.000031362393,0.00021274506,0.000010418496,0.000026134157,0.0027775266,0.99661714,0.0000027584658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016575571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017506735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58096504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043184343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005932869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8286761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244296500","doi":"10.21991/c9h66z","title":"PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1996 PLURALT CONFERENCE - SHOULD WE KEEP TALKING?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.061589044021180525,"score_gpt":0.283101541909172,"score_spread":0.2215124978879915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244296500","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007168452,0.0065949825,0.0005875644,0.89840895,0.024871746,0.00006578029,0.00012225585,0.000025250078,0.06215501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1556512,0.006711983,0.0020625994,0.37129337,0.027865047,0.0005886352,0.00037601974,0.00028826942,0.4351629],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9756383,0.008476374,0.0016548441,0.002270646,0.006814118,0.0051458576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97088057,0.014209748,0.0018584838,0.0015915802,0.0047047986,0.0067548784],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0344421,0.0008907659,0.0016286698,0.0012944173,0.0293595,0.027742058,0.0045653814,0.048569545,0.029668998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08691797,0.0009682687,0.0015785324,0.0021223612,0.010238759,0.015716229,0.011388753,0.036828976,0.005121972],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002123112,0.00018996657,0.0011023761,0.000254982,0.00004258768,0.00108624,0.010724926,0.00025996123,0.0009774786,0.16307181,0.78557867,0.03649874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005023857,0.000028341161,0.0015140187,0.0003881186,0.000017265622,0.000120462275,0.009329041,0.00010232387,0.00041088293,0.019103942,0.9688728,0.00006249042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03856961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.064644635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.970331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0153462505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022773234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18214941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245253311","doi":"10.21991/c9gt1z","title":"Acknowledgments","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.05387471099084247,"score_gpt":0.2457133978223868,"score_spread":0.19183868683154431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245253311","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005525377,0.0017432694,0.0053908178,0.082592525,0.048660986,0.0009710754,0.09018656,0.004126893,0.76080245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024294183,0.00068911177,0.0045235055,0.012679579,0.0027952502,0.00041011922,0.021024037,0.001382471,0.9322017],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99710184,0.0006646631,0.00016067814,0.00032713913,0.0014566935,0.0002889141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9804041,0.002007371,0.0004648962,0.0011213891,0.013085591,0.0029166618],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028445187,0.00080517237,0.0007022357,0.0031468945,0.002131071,0.0036334759,0.0018930077,0.0012442168,0.5619915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018379498,0.00027093882,0.00062885083,0.0017460902,0.0004917617,0.0018334499,0.0032747814,0.0020826755,0.31132704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069306545,0.000033317636,0.00089265354,0.00010824563,0.0000052983582,0.000058339978,0.0001532816,0.0000643905,0.00020862205,0.008454388,0.96760947,0.022342753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022420674,0.000010887728,0.0014150155,0.00012271517,0.00000939513,0.00006207982,0.0004980095,0.00012540456,0.0003565585,0.0024465192,0.9949216,0.000009255869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013799778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020768525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4380085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033556053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052149855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62476593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245681496","doi":"10.21991/c9ww81","title":"LIVING TREE?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tree (set theory); Forestry; Geography; Mathematics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.0405063158638816,"score_gpt":0.245970499325617,"score_spread":0.2054641834617354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245681496","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005186737,0.0013062769,0.002585872,0.07548744,0.0025147155,0.000014560069,0.000092690796,0.00008236947,0.91272926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30578268,0.0012493597,0.001437107,0.06142588,0.0019713982,0.00007044535,0.00018438077,0.00044086578,0.6274378],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759585,0.0008065877,0.000047553855,0.00037602935,0.00053980603,0.00063416146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850607,0.00042879293,0.00008367881,0.00023438018,0.00032699681,0.00042018687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002341734,0.00027355392,0.00039597225,0.0007163662,0.0099211745,0.009509434,0.0010825163,0.005191444,0.062498674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00717818,0.00022172589,0.000282421,0.00080589275,0.011670152,0.009998729,0.004195029,0.007853763,0.011734061],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061979536,0.0000074420136,0.00014611117,0.000008683768,0.0000013704462,0.000043043005,0.0020791017,0.000013829932,0.00004755552,0.90628076,0.08487849,0.006487454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007860714,0.000007357296,0.0003859452,0.00007248113,0.000004559239,0.00010098561,0.004925038,0.000057387406,0.00011615006,0.21154852,0.782761,0.000012802908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011919064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02828117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062498674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034600743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032811768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20907891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246321866","doi":"10.21991/c9r94d","title":"COMMENTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.05338444324577618,"score_gpt":0.2600943855705252,"score_spread":0.20670994232474904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246321866","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006220665,0.0009603445,0.00022438943,0.78439486,0.17145093,0.0001786898,0.0015366201,0.0004106843,0.04022149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003330219,0.0005206069,0.00020558917,0.85587335,0.037411593,0.000257097,0.0005062227,0.00016279193,0.10173255],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887621,0.0016268637,0.00089211715,0.0011828305,0.0056967163,0.0018392812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9598782,0.014230793,0.002490721,0.0016960662,0.018568855,0.00313537],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007522526,0.0010469501,0.0012791309,0.0022033069,0.005349464,0.0052300273,0.004365351,0.032995638,0.16754542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.085883655,0.00080971426,0.002477279,0.0015387235,0.002517794,0.0028223954,0.004139588,0.015953453,0.10936704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016708433,0.0000039628976,0.00006538534,0.000035407764,0.0000025127063,0.000089017485,0.000045008816,0.0000074339837,0.000027232116,0.0002893848,0.9983607,0.0010573856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044844634,0.000010118898,0.00042718736,0.00020430009,0.000011510752,0.000110232235,0.0003272334,0.000035584642,0.00012153725,0.0006507329,0.99803704,0.000019732779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011262059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01297471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83245456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060495203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068026013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246812994","doi":"10.21991/cf29372","title":"Introduction","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Library science; Management; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.014407567624850822,"score_gpt":0.26246307782026373,"score_spread":0.24805551019541291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246812994","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011458143,0.0075490223,0.003416803,0.0513552,0.020929532,0.00020107142,0.0051438147,0.0006403891,0.90961826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015906246,0.008486584,0.0029941783,0.018905433,0.009497999,0.0002614214,0.0061070956,0.0005010808,0.93733996],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752384,0.0003658403,0.00011121157,0.0005765359,0.0010903741,0.0003322134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956572,0.0008522151,0.00018939388,0.00042715445,0.0022598119,0.00061423925],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021103092,0.00071647373,0.000531961,0.0020216482,0.0028675487,0.0069033843,0.0022585876,0.003422,0.42697382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010639523,0.00030839804,0.00060490187,0.0021956435,0.0013878247,0.0047499603,0.0030467224,0.00312824,0.19471209],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025897518,0.000021312837,0.00035307373,0.00018217626,0.0000031584464,0.00007330199,0.00043472982,0.00006682278,0.00008996878,0.058989156,0.8738206,0.06593988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017501541,0.000004579074,0.00022091343,0.00011724603,8.380203e-7,0.000036616857,0.00016411992,0.000015084202,0.000022170478,0.003895119,0.99551857,0.0000030001045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0079231905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076805465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5730262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037883574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004624423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8173523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247081427","doi":"10.21991/c9c38f","title":"Introduction","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Period (music); Political science; Negotiation; History; Psychology; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.02911620297995309,"score_gpt":0.23406400030670765,"score_spread":0.20494779732675455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247081427","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018566357,0.0076141767,0.0045682164,0.042578705,0.03080109,0.00016863244,0.0045610946,0.0008329998,0.90701854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023400376,0.006874476,0.0028939147,0.0134286005,0.011816205,0.00019470084,0.0057414384,0.000679046,0.93497115],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978434,0.0003786127,0.00011097021,0.00046478157,0.0009409144,0.00026131613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969919,0.00076416525,0.00019716428,0.00039894902,0.0011370317,0.00051080494],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00178082,0.00057972723,0.0004926489,0.0013500166,0.0025291028,0.0072104298,0.0015022183,0.00334146,0.40551835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072848867,0.00023810791,0.00046798267,0.0014471516,0.0014109422,0.0045593847,0.0030886687,0.0030130337,0.18016665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003267683,0.000022714241,0.0004440391,0.0001876774,0.0000034748546,0.00007894964,0.0008142634,0.0000708041,0.00021756721,0.07210198,0.84308875,0.082937226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012406954,0.0000044007497,0.00017731494,0.00007237692,6.639526e-7,0.00003077959,0.00014959023,0.000012107331,0.000029739938,0.0027013654,0.9968177,0.0000027522906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028935322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033164378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59448165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022590496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029737146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84795594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247227743","doi":"10.21991/cf29361","title":"Introduction","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Indigenous; Attendance; Girl; Sociology; Psychology; Visual arts; Gender studies; Art; Political science; Law; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.014932130466181014,"score_gpt":0.2898471780500747,"score_spread":0.2749150475838937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247227743","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006730409,0.001805154,0.003687631,0.015783643,0.005280024,0.00016072752,0.0014506045,0.00029629862,0.96480554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07226705,0.0025761626,0.004167229,0.010905715,0.0011918173,0.00022691894,0.0021578453,0.0003220085,0.9061852],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990853,0.00026522158,0.00003489566,0.00017823395,0.0002860499,0.00015023109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992791,0.00014212806,0.000040593968,0.0000769011,0.00020729011,0.00025401928],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072244625,0.00049128267,0.00023976823,0.00064723013,0.0041138856,0.0042885523,0.0011932526,0.002460425,0.20932588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027234722,0.00017476265,0.00033534694,0.0006722676,0.0017524018,0.0030070206,0.0034726672,0.0022374303,0.06549369],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000093058916,0.00009908226,0.0013778456,0.00030152616,0.0000061590813,0.0022257087,0.02638955,0.00010594299,0.000802696,0.14875478,0.7075002,0.112343304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018546732,0.000009148526,0.00025067967,0.000090177666,9.2022486e-7,0.00040032968,0.0030940184,0.000015217917,0.00006130354,0.0026823578,0.9933897,0.0000042664783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044352217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068099275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7906741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019218022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020863386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7002648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247729909","doi":"10.21991/c9d08q","title":"COMMENTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.05338444324577618,"score_gpt":0.2600943855705252,"score_spread":0.20670994232474904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247729909","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006220665,0.0009603445,0.00022438943,0.78439486,0.17145093,0.0001786898,0.0015366201,0.0004106843,0.04022149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003330219,0.0005206069,0.00020558917,0.85587335,0.037411593,0.000257097,0.0005062227,0.00016279193,0.10173255],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887621,0.0016268637,0.00089211715,0.0011828305,0.0056967163,0.0018392812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9598782,0.014230793,0.002490721,0.0016960662,0.018568855,0.00313537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007522526,0.0010469501,0.0012791309,0.0022033069,0.005349464,0.0052300273,0.004365351,0.032995638,0.16754542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.085883655,0.00080971426,0.002477279,0.0015387235,0.002517794,0.0028223954,0.004139588,0.015953453,0.10936704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016708433,0.0000039628976,0.00006538534,0.000035407764,0.0000025127063,0.000089017485,0.000045008816,0.0000074339837,0.000027232116,0.0002893848,0.9983607,0.0010573856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044844634,0.000010118898,0.00042718736,0.00020430009,0.000011510752,0.000110232235,0.0003272334,0.000035584642,0.00012153725,0.0006507329,0.99803704,0.000019732779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011262059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01297471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16754542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060495203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068026013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248504228","doi":"10.21991/cf29369","title":"Jordan’s Principle: Reconciliation and the First Nations Child","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Redress; Commission; Indigenous; Political science; Welfare; Public administration; Corporate governance; Action (physics); Residential school; Economic growth; Sociology; Public relations; Law; Socioeconomics; Business","score_opus":0.010186608538138492,"score_gpt":0.26636313386418836,"score_spread":0.25617652532604984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248504228","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00840134,0.0037507294,0.013385078,0.067637,0.0008986882,0.00010857438,0.00006626084,0.00006672565,0.9056854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71008486,0.0024447825,0.02135241,0.05337123,0.0009834717,0.00063770276,0.000098855984,0.00016428935,0.21086244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9858577,0.009380266,0.00037919526,0.001109241,0.0017932522,0.0014802672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99726886,0.0011658323,0.00024717237,0.0005398123,0.00050067046,0.00027770706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01624973,0.00037545525,0.0005515753,0.0010788476,0.013639324,0.008582666,0.0016581101,0.00859173,0.0067821224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011635104,0.00033677983,0.0007019409,0.00088930305,0.060857207,0.0076040556,0.009532282,0.0091621615,0.0011402327],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024697813,0.0000026317875,0.000045104174,0.0000073648307,0.0000012579534,0.000027261327,0.0024653762,0.00002474913,0.000012552121,0.9925282,0.0032158014,0.001667302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019056139,0.000015418127,0.0002361668,0.00021354161,0.0000062563677,0.00031388746,0.0037594636,0.00013704885,0.00024915583,0.5854276,0.40959916,0.00002322185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0189199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025643654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9810801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071753324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014167271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0859378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248688215","doi":"10.21991/c9vq2q","title":"SECTION 33 AND THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LEGISLATURES AND COURTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Constitution; Law; Political science; Section (typography); Politics; Separation of powers; Government (linguistics); Balance (ability); Business","score_opus":0.06463527563743278,"score_gpt":0.28574065324498915,"score_spread":0.22110537760755639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248688215","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031921767,0.012585335,0.011231055,0.11880815,0.0013619364,0.000083454666,0.00013604364,0.00006635583,0.823806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.847156,0.0058782655,0.005804714,0.04440534,0.0013620943,0.0003073393,0.00009475669,0.00005956593,0.094931856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98573595,0.008049532,0.0003972826,0.0012574797,0.0027413126,0.0018184214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99153626,0.005353524,0.0010095964,0.0005158294,0.0011530085,0.00043179866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008447987,0.00017235121,0.00019799345,0.0014192159,0.0069802133,0.0066687036,0.0008826673,0.005429742,0.006269112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016916927,0.00036636367,0.00023667293,0.001431914,0.020323835,0.0042952136,0.0025217182,0.0064499904,0.0010341726],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016267226,0.0000019193396,0.00018179971,0.0000042982583,5.395088e-7,0.000018686549,0.0011622591,0.000021546517,0.000029846553,0.9942783,0.002661028,0.0016380608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017075417,0.000042133288,0.0062079737,0.00033906716,0.000008653235,0.00015271743,0.0024432018,0.00023435161,0.00026716103,0.5029814,0.48727086,0.000035366145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04719628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06694569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04719628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006806036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013418834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0938431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249856333","doi":"10.21991/c9w082","title":"COMMENTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.05338444324577618,"score_gpt":0.2600943855705252,"score_spread":0.20670994232474904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249856333","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006220665,0.0009603445,0.00022438943,0.78439486,0.17145093,0.0001786898,0.0015366201,0.0004106843,0.04022149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003330219,0.0005206069,0.00020558917,0.85587335,0.037411593,0.000257097,0.0005062227,0.00016279193,0.10173255],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887621,0.0016268637,0.00089211715,0.0011828305,0.0056967163,0.0018392812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9598782,0.014230793,0.002490721,0.0016960662,0.018568855,0.00313537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007522526,0.0010469501,0.0012791309,0.0022033069,0.005349464,0.0052300273,0.004365351,0.032995638,0.16754542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.085883655,0.00080971426,0.002477279,0.0015387235,0.002517794,0.0028223954,0.004139588,0.015953453,0.10936704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016708433,0.0000039628976,0.00006538534,0.000035407764,0.0000025127063,0.000089017485,0.000045008816,0.0000074339837,0.000027232116,0.0002893848,0.9983607,0.0010573856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044844634,0.000010118898,0.00042718736,0.00020430009,0.000011510752,0.000110232235,0.0003272334,0.000035584642,0.00012153725,0.0006507329,0.99803704,0.000019732779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011262059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01297471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16754542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060495203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068026013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249937940","doi":"10.21991/c9x08c","title":"COMMENTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.05338444324577618,"score_gpt":0.2600943855705252,"score_spread":0.20670994232474904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249937940","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006220665,0.0009603445,0.00022438943,0.78439486,0.17145093,0.0001786898,0.0015366201,0.0004106843,0.04022149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003330219,0.0005206069,0.00020558917,0.85587335,0.037411593,0.000257097,0.0005062227,0.00016279193,0.10173255],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887621,0.0016268637,0.00089211715,0.0011828305,0.0056967163,0.0018392812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9598782,0.014230793,0.002490721,0.0016960662,0.018568855,0.00313537],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007522526,0.0010469501,0.0012791309,0.0022033069,0.005349464,0.0052300273,0.004365351,0.032995638,0.16754542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.085883655,0.00080971426,0.002477279,0.0015387235,0.002517794,0.0028223954,0.004139588,0.015953453,0.10936704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016708433,0.0000039628976,0.00006538534,0.000035407764,0.0000025127063,0.000089017485,0.000045008816,0.0000074339837,0.000027232116,0.0002893848,0.9983607,0.0010573856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044844634,0.000010118898,0.00042718736,0.00020430009,0.000011510752,0.000110232235,0.0003272334,0.000035584642,0.00012153725,0.0006507329,0.99803704,0.000019732779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011262059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01297471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83245456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060495203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068026013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251352435","doi":"10.21991/c94d4v","title":"TREATY FEDERALISM","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Treaty; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04308124114616622,"score_gpt":0.2861313456202399,"score_spread":0.24305010447407369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251352435","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016140946,0.0032141565,0.0076873247,0.03205201,0.004654643,0.000114775066,0.0004641104,0.00015232686,0.9500464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20375106,0.0051791295,0.0070114536,0.07403476,0.01721983,0.0012182592,0.00096080266,0.00045487192,0.6901699],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879588,0.0029121109,0.0005222275,0.0023761531,0.0042256624,0.0020050746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972863,0.000949245,0.00022292383,0.0006583231,0.0007345953,0.00014865586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063067726,0.0009800979,0.0014792335,0.0037238256,0.009320235,0.010074063,0.0020251647,0.014283578,0.037974164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015399597,0.00091453915,0.0017118704,0.0030925074,0.008391976,0.007883238,0.0044335527,0.022558697,0.008664391],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049504497,0.00000919146,0.000014679775,0.0000135219925,0.0000046114146,0.0000083635505,0.00006539348,0.0000527839,0.000028686236,0.9727391,0.02482909,0.002229742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031945234,0.000016382077,0.00024003525,0.00011249861,0.00002123531,0.000039135084,0.000062270345,0.00023964036,0.0001650048,0.5673475,0.43170044,0.000023924713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02108033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018753203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037974164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01075493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010416033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12703615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251909989","doi":"10.21991/c98942","title":"COMMENTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.05338444324577618,"score_gpt":0.2600943855705252,"score_spread":0.20670994232474904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251909989","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006220665,0.0009603445,0.00022438943,0.78439486,0.17145093,0.0001786898,0.0015366201,0.0004106843,0.04022149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003330219,0.0005206069,0.00020558917,0.85587335,0.037411593,0.000257097,0.0005062227,0.00016279193,0.10173255],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887621,0.0016268637,0.00089211715,0.0011828305,0.0056967163,0.0018392812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9598782,0.014230793,0.002490721,0.0016960662,0.018568855,0.00313537],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007522526,0.0010469501,0.0012791309,0.0022033069,0.005349464,0.0052300273,0.004365351,0.032995638,0.16754542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.085883655,0.00080971426,0.002477279,0.0015387235,0.002517794,0.0028223954,0.004139588,0.015953453,0.10936704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016708433,0.0000039628976,0.00006538534,0.000035407764,0.0000025127063,0.000089017485,0.000045008816,0.0000074339837,0.000027232116,0.0002893848,0.9983607,0.0010573856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044844634,0.000010118898,0.00042718736,0.00020430009,0.000011510752,0.000110232235,0.0003272334,0.000035584642,0.00012153725,0.0006507329,0.99803704,0.000019732779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011262059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01297471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83245456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060495203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068026013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252004179","doi":"10.21991/c9f081","title":"PARADISE POSTPONED","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Paradise; Art; Art history","score_opus":0.06474103970274006,"score_gpt":0.20628190724147685,"score_spread":0.1415408675387368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252004179","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005272849,0.008455074,0.0022215701,0.214501,0.3882977,0.00027974232,0.0012607501,0.0011388919,0.37857243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01658695,0.00065336056,0.0004813308,0.04787139,0.019423885,0.000103530954,0.00019006335,0.0004060005,0.9142835],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99005777,0.0009826138,0.00029708285,0.001272381,0.0047375197,0.00265265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99381447,0.0014026627,0.00023178801,0.0010043881,0.002366232,0.0011804668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057349456,0.0008779479,0.0011805929,0.0014269407,0.007981604,0.013384806,0.0032155777,0.02160394,0.17235152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027892666,0.00090241694,0.0018047781,0.0007565965,0.0029974938,0.005197661,0.0069449064,0.022807429,0.050230093],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096584066,0.00004167361,0.00011853742,0.000054050295,0.00001046824,0.00034619813,0.00014188397,0.00007174966,0.00036867696,0.035889007,0.95229256,0.010568577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017709473,0.000025027959,0.00021237094,0.00004054423,0.0000038004018,0.00006209106,0.00008953177,0.000053673564,0.00018375632,0.003164129,0.9961282,0.000019086845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011602446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024198167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17235152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064188694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071414025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57657325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253039063","doi":"10.21991/c9pq25","title":"Introduction","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Political science; Library science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.015768966203594546,"score_gpt":0.2637771714862154,"score_spread":0.24800820528262082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253039063","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00083938823,0.005708869,0.002316569,0.063255556,0.069737874,0.0001381485,0.0034143645,0.0007288202,0.8538604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00600777,0.0027281793,0.0009938834,0.014074852,0.012546909,0.00009626151,0.0023976609,0.00038352658,0.9607709],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800533,0.0002893911,0.00010135001,0.000444049,0.0008988859,0.00026109425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971854,0.0005556731,0.00013413053,0.00032965458,0.0012703227,0.0005248864],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016921086,0.0007124341,0.0006269648,0.0013722727,0.002601455,0.0076527945,0.0018796703,0.0040115183,0.49642727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007590685,0.00027298022,0.00061373477,0.0013253322,0.0011132212,0.0044989055,0.003166197,0.003497602,0.28355592],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017027814,0.000013563205,0.00013699371,0.000083483734,0.0000017119935,0.000028893008,0.00017330018,0.000025570214,0.000095288335,0.02413292,0.93990153,0.03538966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012849036,0.000003611108,0.00010220696,0.00004473352,5.2756377e-7,0.00001465119,0.00006203837,0.000009198398,0.000018307615,0.0017363249,0.9980052,0.0000019727736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002587444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004039929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49642727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022093873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030654778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7182854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253083530","doi":"10.21991/c9w09f","title":"The Challenges of Securing an Open Society","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Military and Defense Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Nova scotia; Political science; Morning; History; Medicine; Archaeology","score_opus":0.09394081541241597,"score_gpt":0.3176182329711919,"score_spread":0.22367741755877593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253083530","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014881777,0.009775504,0.0027203567,0.6444347,0.0031864913,0.000029086083,0.00005821437,0.000055557226,0.32485843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8262858,0.013466628,0.0031510636,0.050382115,0.0050014174,0.00019931103,0.000106945205,0.0001267697,0.10127992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878755,0.0059457202,0.00025510695,0.0008908082,0.0022903476,0.0027424828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98163855,0.006460732,0.0009858597,0.001934639,0.002325402,0.006654779],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0162988,0.00040297204,0.00042550132,0.0011787012,0.020609358,0.022826493,0.0014090133,0.009932972,0.016567418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020559484,0.00028042292,0.00041860333,0.0010411598,0.04815591,0.020646289,0.013786494,0.012204591,0.0029467735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007627942,0.000017059232,0.00020499888,0.00002793239,0.000003450205,0.00006234488,0.004287127,0.00011964733,0.000050747505,0.94086915,0.042795934,0.011553908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009388775,0.000023141638,0.0007288583,0.00027123027,0.0000037759423,0.00007052461,0.013460971,0.00018139991,0.00008221577,0.57191515,0.41323325,0.00002014638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011560885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0143050775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022826493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009193351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020791419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08619732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254543405","doi":"10.21991/c9m66w","title":"RESPECTING DEMOCRATIC ROLES","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Criticism; Political science; Democracy; Humanities; Confusion; Law; Philosophy; Politics; Psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.057470757040691926,"score_gpt":0.28611344619143725,"score_spread":0.22864268915074532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254543405","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029327316,0.0026716273,0.014998496,0.10305117,0.0019678136,0.000065916145,0.000055553133,0.000093249306,0.84776884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9151587,0.0010995447,0.002496563,0.014664609,0.0011902583,0.000114162016,0.000033479562,0.000105884414,0.065136865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9724649,0.013392174,0.0008621305,0.0029621555,0.0041564084,0.006162189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97609496,0.010890308,0.0022139798,0.0046941554,0.002604614,0.003502008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020939607,0.0005833783,0.0006132904,0.0011744195,0.016415093,0.017325673,0.0014306402,0.006818192,0.009597198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03622888,0.00040739094,0.0005821413,0.0011448555,0.03800363,0.012040942,0.013269392,0.009918366,0.0018162049],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005971014,0.000006786771,0.00016548051,0.000011981448,0.000002404714,0.000028599765,0.0033066024,0.000054635657,0.00006867954,0.9905222,0.0029739772,0.002852834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025835885,0.000020241354,0.00045527957,0.000094529074,0.000007031738,0.00008842721,0.00295164,0.0001782841,0.000410401,0.7756531,0.22009902,0.000016158267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004269931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00676852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020939607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0081493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013223536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11074054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254994774","doi":"10.21991/c90t07","title":"COMMENTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.05338444324577618,"score_gpt":0.2600943855705252,"score_spread":0.20670994232474904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254994774","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006220665,0.0009603445,0.00022438943,0.78439486,0.17145093,0.0001786898,0.0015366201,0.0004106843,0.04022149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003330219,0.0005206069,0.00020558917,0.85587335,0.037411593,0.000257097,0.0005062227,0.00016279193,0.10173255],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887621,0.0016268637,0.00089211715,0.0011828305,0.0056967163,0.0018392812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9598782,0.014230793,0.002490721,0.0016960662,0.018568855,0.00313537],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007522526,0.0010469501,0.0012791309,0.0022033069,0.005349464,0.0052300273,0.004365351,0.032995638,0.16754542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.085883655,0.00080971426,0.002477279,0.0015387235,0.002517794,0.0028223954,0.004139588,0.015953453,0.10936704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016708433,0.0000039628976,0.00006538534,0.000035407764,0.0000025127063,0.000089017485,0.000045008816,0.0000074339837,0.000027232116,0.0002893848,0.9983607,0.0010573856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044844634,0.000010118898,0.00042718736,0.00020430009,0.000011510752,0.000110232235,0.0003272334,0.000035584642,0.00012153725,0.0006507329,0.99803704,0.000019732779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011262059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01297471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83245456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060495203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068026013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255172578","doi":"10.21991/c9vt00","title":"The Role of the Federal Court in National Security Issues: Balancing the Charter Against Anti-terrorism Measures","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; National security; Political science; Terrorism; Law; Democracy; Context (archaeology); Public administration; Politics; History","score_opus":0.03150337659570767,"score_gpt":0.2847661601787739,"score_spread":0.2532627835830662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255172578","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03889307,0.018049128,0.0026950734,0.76129156,0.003057211,0.00006488436,0.000071978844,0.00004603102,0.17583099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9140025,0.005731685,0.002007214,0.058741957,0.0013986261,0.0000445597,0.000037179572,0.00002924234,0.018007115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96375936,0.01838347,0.00093371514,0.002003379,0.007886449,0.007033625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93704146,0.04686708,0.0028321587,0.0015388286,0.007488563,0.0042319805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05165379,0.0003560881,0.0009307611,0.0040199896,0.029867953,0.050378084,0.0047392924,0.029194443,0.0061566033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.073302165,0.00087360357,0.0004838666,0.004164132,0.04269401,0.016785914,0.006631698,0.022041103,0.0006249135],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036341076,0.000025957632,0.0009548825,0.00008197667,0.000014339869,0.00033885209,0.01042391,0.00026667045,0.00019119425,0.9427778,0.029363068,0.01552505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001133715,0.000084461,0.0103595145,0.0022852693,0.00013602816,0.00027494904,0.06391392,0.0017999428,0.0015993862,0.4971523,0.42200077,0.00028012175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.50332564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6456681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9385485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06145151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08102092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99919873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281671755","doi":"10.21991/cf29441","title":"Checking our Attachment to the Charter and Respecting Indigenous Legal Orders: A Framework for Charter Application to Indigenous Governments","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Charter; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0196496625573823,"score_gpt":0.3135892674726592,"score_spread":0.2939396049152769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281671755","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048659544,0.0005891172,0.470887,0.1040371,0.0015951594,0.0020616108,0.0005049637,0.0019153315,0.36975014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5621056,0.0003778557,0.38474792,0.008789716,0.00041482135,0.0014420652,0.0002395561,0.00068874186,0.041193638],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.86302936,0.08781625,0.0077996384,0.010446778,0.021231549,0.009676468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81926465,0.116022974,0.008094403,0.022687411,0.030962346,0.0029682422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.15098336,0.0007145818,0.0021685215,0.005833041,0.02084001,0.03662191,0.008275413,0.019341784,0.011056143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24677719,0.0018406432,0.0022583501,0.0047910274,0.04837243,0.029571641,0.011980815,0.022704264,0.0019889588],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012301564,0.000034476776,0.00054992497,0.000031551554,0.0000070976203,0.000117187665,0.012128444,0.0006267052,0.00017236728,0.97042185,0.006276089,0.00962197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039660103,0.00005940132,0.0015557805,0.000707031,0.000079686455,0.00009356304,0.014277304,0.010796863,0.0017092675,0.8486724,0.12172484,0.00028423773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12190659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10654772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8780934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021829814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.064599484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7984859},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281679871","doi":"10.21991/cf29444","title":"Doctrine Calling: Inherent Indigenous Jurisdiction in Vuntut Gwitchin","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Indigenous; Jurisdiction; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Chemistry; Philosophy; Sociology; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.02070468328231063,"score_gpt":0.2974262186870117,"score_spread":0.27672153540470107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281679871","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15725945,0.0033309597,0.004878489,0.038626418,0.00084786955,0.0001602373,0.00006358821,0.000066431305,0.7947664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83405423,0.00053500367,0.0016739551,0.009318066,0.00012952079,0.00012309017,0.000020564781,0.00007248516,0.154073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997074,0.0008856093,0.00012950483,0.00049146684,0.00041736665,0.0010020388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983588,0.0010187365,0.00011409596,0.000106295905,0.00018894165,0.00021298864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039721904,0.00021201915,0.00044863753,0.0005868045,0.029571729,0.007559552,0.0011701977,0.0047570486,0.009294777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057534366,0.00044606166,0.00017058318,0.0009599403,0.012102518,0.0037039432,0.0060475105,0.009059347,0.0006373361],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000127319245,0.00001093588,0.0003055816,0.00003272791,0.0000018740424,0.00037020966,0.04470978,0.0000457662,0.0004387264,0.9430913,0.0063655344,0.004614924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031638974,0.00004236327,0.0040848246,0.00048099397,0.000033363474,0.0009324712,0.071742885,0.00056865247,0.0024731238,0.18975233,0.7297825,0.00007477487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051797107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12926134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9482029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066887597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011947441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10299122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281692467","doi":"10.21991/cf29442","title":"Towards a Renewed Relationship: Modern Treaties & the Recognition of Indigenous Law-Making Authority","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; Law; International law; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.07279110094786197,"score_gpt":0.3283526564245615,"score_spread":0.25556155547669956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281692467","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017507296,0.012736559,0.002788997,0.36241716,0.0035122475,0.0000358958,0.00006027799,0.000052061587,0.60088944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6851638,0.006543463,0.0035334197,0.06646076,0.00392297,0.00012725733,0.00004428383,0.00013160895,0.23407231],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99386954,0.0026084625,0.00021592807,0.0008006291,0.0014200988,0.0010852396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957224,0.0023752055,0.00031926954,0.0005101242,0.0006041915,0.0004687372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008852546,0.00030179718,0.000495866,0.0012645435,0.013890335,0.01714986,0.001724153,0.018211832,0.0132041825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013922928,0.00038959717,0.00046478573,0.0016924872,0.032483507,0.013073602,0.005677435,0.014569512,0.0009565458],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003846403,0.000014271115,0.000045918547,0.000016723046,0.0000024274884,0.000032480457,0.0026233608,0.00003373152,0.000071677765,0.98000884,0.013798279,0.003348524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015755888,0.000016050062,0.0011789615,0.00027064251,0.000010304043,0.000080255435,0.005197662,0.00024291375,0.0003005135,0.48450565,0.5081434,0.00003778019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05057464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09197272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05057464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0109786345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01600127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10056049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281715103","doi":"10.21991/cf29443","title":"Dickson v Vuntut Gwitchin First Nation, Section 25 and a Plurinational Charter","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Charter; Political science; History; Law; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.022677648802949302,"score_gpt":0.2633903208127694,"score_spread":0.2407126720098201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281715103","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029939868,0.006560067,0.0015475913,0.07248856,0.003378911,0.00047763338,0.00089069665,0.00016592586,0.88455075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1970993,0.0023354588,0.0016339105,0.1892503,0.0008089478,0.0009231832,0.00029216867,0.000136474,0.60752034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964066,0.0006399503,0.0002263406,0.0005480034,0.0007577951,0.0014212372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973023,0.001680944,0.00018305567,0.00013973236,0.00042571503,0.00026812486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043923445,0.0006618463,0.0005627051,0.0010636081,0.011932358,0.007987712,0.0020029577,0.022221986,0.015591028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012295787,0.00095962564,0.0005333801,0.0010967301,0.0029688443,0.0032732857,0.0027087913,0.012282586,0.0024858722],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006769169,0.000053734904,0.0007198693,0.00012361543,0.000011681701,0.0005436904,0.0033494788,0.00010975287,0.000724436,0.7754375,0.2129291,0.005929463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001102832,0.000056918332,0.0040109176,0.000589307,0.000044212145,0.00024684216,0.0025402233,0.00021644213,0.0010813858,0.044969793,0.94604206,0.00009155563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17731912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32392403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17731912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057377527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021472916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.352574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281944215","doi":"10.21991/cf29440","title":"Special Issue on Dickson v. Vuntut Gwitchin First Nation, 2021 YKCA 5","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.023339500237354822,"score_gpt":0.2675515541482636,"score_spread":0.24421205391090878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281944215","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015133742,0.008220505,0.0004028958,0.14066945,0.062209874,0.0003530795,0.0062927473,0.00036297,0.7799752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0061681257,0.0023763159,0.00027983173,0.09403607,0.012689201,0.00029229117,0.0014597396,0.00013924185,0.88255924],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998451,0.00019635844,0.00006733016,0.00022626403,0.00068014866,0.00037894226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997689,0.0010051528,0.00010184507,0.00011008645,0.00078979175,0.000304095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019280033,0.0008679864,0.0009082962,0.0014824746,0.005258976,0.0061669922,0.001765124,0.017457372,0.15175535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061722146,0.00051702524,0.00082065165,0.00089287973,0.0010688824,0.0023784519,0.0018526333,0.007932063,0.05567423],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010659917,0.000011557689,0.00004912685,0.000019908039,0.0000012776204,0.000038026603,0.000019755296,0.0000113219885,0.00006552993,0.0033803184,0.9948251,0.0015674124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014090876,0.000008751102,0.000694008,0.00011241906,0.0000050157873,0.000024579307,0.00005193391,0.000038740247,0.00006703258,0.0014992539,0.99747497,0.000009281766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06038975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15878521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93961024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004866094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012482609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5076722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281967755","doi":"10.21991/cf29445","title":"The Paradox of Political Questions in Canadian Aboriginal Law: Why Dickson v Vuntut Gwitchin First Nation Requires Reconsideration of the Political Questions Doctrine in Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Doctrine; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.022137118956822677,"score_gpt":0.2900613215639113,"score_spread":0.2679242026070886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281967755","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09898303,0.0060240263,0.001069037,0.6283817,0.00086145976,0.000063545114,0.00025236382,0.000046080702,0.26431873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.842302,0.0028058875,0.0013932127,0.09462633,0.00026732023,0.000050726212,0.00007268557,0.00010026,0.05838165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927577,0.0011986475,0.00016497185,0.0006641445,0.0021522534,0.0030622405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859505,0.005381879,0.00045561802,0.00029358253,0.0052319276,0.0026864745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008310311,0.00037916453,0.0005402301,0.0015656167,0.050172254,0.017876102,0.0037218041,0.0123680895,0.009598127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020685894,0.0006456797,0.0005853198,0.0029156765,0.025874335,0.005392876,0.003950503,0.013941268,0.00042184928],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038276416,0.00003276154,0.0030738926,0.00009502694,0.000019981362,0.00034650686,0.040713873,0.00041513445,0.00027604523,0.84656674,0.09815008,0.010271561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012172666,0.000032205575,0.02056187,0.0006821387,0.00012886802,0.00022923571,0.16005927,0.0018864402,0.00089534745,0.16806805,0.646979,0.0003558372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99754936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99886227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18547106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18547106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34814858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94473815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308531148","doi":"10.21991/cf29450","title":"Two Roads to Guantanamo: The Canadian and United States Supreme Courts’ Approaches to the Extraterritorial Application of Fundamental Rights","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Department of Defense","keywords":"Ideal (ethics); Contingency; LEAPS; Supreme court; Politics; State (computer science); Law; Nationalism; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.045400047311389406,"score_gpt":0.2736296185498066,"score_spread":0.2282295712384172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308531148","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08633921,0.009275521,0.003168849,0.12837729,0.0010680469,0.00007770706,0.000115097864,0.00006256778,0.77151567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9384359,0.0016459752,0.0017823273,0.012581663,0.00012026058,0.000053142656,0.000039228984,0.000040119237,0.045301437],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99636674,0.0008672915,0.000044430122,0.0003682728,0.000688635,0.0016645852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998114,0.0005744992,0.00009352362,0.0001779001,0.0005949677,0.00044513153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038320795,0.00043947686,0.00041135467,0.0012976811,0.02588601,0.010964193,0.0019010475,0.006654946,0.00479671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065386365,0.0003257885,0.0004889137,0.0015845712,0.035492655,0.00480366,0.0045319973,0.008975736,0.0001836075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019877063,0.000008446019,0.0005267603,0.000011293587,0.0000035626394,0.00015732564,0.010816587,0.00011592005,0.00008532642,0.97750777,0.005591518,0.005155688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011647516,0.000043445747,0.008449753,0.00039504326,0.000059091504,0.00025462214,0.059321374,0.001599749,0.00060183153,0.48335412,0.44563988,0.00016457115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9541038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9825049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.077760376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.077760376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0895743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56419367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308531174","doi":"10.21991/cf29446","title":"The Charter at Forty: Commemorating Patriation and Reflecting Upon the Promises and Perils of Human Rights","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Human rights; Politics; Political science; Multiculturalism; Constitution; Law; Hindsight bias; State (computer science); Environmental ethics","score_opus":0.023980859396261107,"score_gpt":0.2800273898718876,"score_spread":0.2560465304756265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308531174","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043646254,0.011702924,0.0040544514,0.5696446,0.010253918,0.00014363822,0.00026437183,0.00020903682,0.36008084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7125147,0.0061651645,0.004949415,0.07088263,0.0012468682,0.00012190984,0.00018896066,0.00036752265,0.20356287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9807504,0.004199934,0.00024207127,0.0009896852,0.006144063,0.007673951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98452073,0.004618214,0.00061092334,0.00072992436,0.0042708097,0.0052494667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016580943,0.0006499438,0.0005030207,0.002528943,0.05604515,0.028427452,0.0025933858,0.007975871,0.0067637097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023191832,0.0005802078,0.0004021573,0.002687896,0.06440337,0.009445154,0.008541447,0.020322446,0.0007728773],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032199154,0.000017749275,0.0008203872,0.00006714932,0.0000060403736,0.0005510475,0.11902783,0.00027901147,0.0005639824,0.58036363,0.2731215,0.025149463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005388652,0.000008922714,0.0010537492,0.00014556377,0.000004088522,0.000060777587,0.06083315,0.00009947956,0.00027660292,0.021362983,0.91609764,0.000051619016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9516029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9802012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1335248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1335248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3263516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9687948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308573791","doi":"10.21991/cf29448","title":"From Isolation to Inclusion: How the Charter Changed our Perceptions of Being and Belonging","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Inclusion (mineral); Mainstream; Identity (music); Political science; Indigenous; Constitution; Sociology; Human rights; Isolation (microbiology); Diversity (politics); Mainstreaming; Gender studies; Law; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.020641295851680227,"score_gpt":0.28352861683782804,"score_spread":0.2628873209861478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308573791","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6812519,0.0036336028,0.003914552,0.10671694,0.0012525902,0.00007702327,0.0001363661,0.00009026203,0.20292678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902436,0.00044762372,0.0003002827,0.0019335032,0.00004214772,0.000010169832,0.000019603875,0.00003282368,0.0069703166],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98872405,0.0048711873,0.00012763594,0.0007042249,0.0023558724,0.0032170143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99245197,0.002444939,0.00044095865,0.00035671933,0.001705061,0.0026003849],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011480956,0.00051865954,0.00062527606,0.002542592,0.0656452,0.021879027,0.0024003226,0.0034384534,0.0040424545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012551213,0.0003510661,0.00044949108,0.0026418827,0.081266664,0.008876098,0.010352111,0.010860259,0.00023435873],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019404773,0.000012746986,0.0015343811,0.000018512934,0.0000033110482,0.00015580929,0.92270315,0.000057800113,0.000117002324,0.0655323,0.0041115675,0.0057341047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063413013,0.000018870847,0.0022924691,0.000090057736,0.000008448423,0.00007759524,0.8930794,0.00013423736,0.00012237193,0.009880095,0.09423705,0.00005318274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92340344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9333838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07659656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07445483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08026428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5402101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308574186","doi":"10.21991/cf29449","title":"Isolation and Human Rights: Arendt and the Charter at Forty","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Prejudice (legal term); Civil rights; Political science; Social rights; Isolation (microbiology); Human rights; Law; Social equality; Inequality; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.020448904025077007,"score_gpt":0.27973316897356343,"score_spread":0.25928426494848644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308574186","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020665327,0.013811652,0.0042880205,0.2250961,0.0021872127,0.00004698476,0.00005721779,0.00003451732,0.733813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83067757,0.0042629885,0.001637334,0.028387014,0.00081572036,0.00011192867,0.0000423517,0.00006753424,0.1339975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913338,0.002903118,0.00013261664,0.0007577112,0.0024652653,0.0024075718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99707925,0.0012683077,0.0001659984,0.00027275932,0.0005542047,0.0006593738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008651426,0.0004701064,0.0005086164,0.0012386427,0.026099527,0.012543007,0.0013362201,0.0050128903,0.006700035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008940134,0.0003057932,0.00039828598,0.00113359,0.078138836,0.009562352,0.0065703504,0.01216335,0.0005040829],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033983076,0.000003736702,0.000034145425,0.000005300263,6.823262e-7,0.000014353644,0.0031789455,0.00002335312,0.000014256456,0.988934,0.005995207,0.0017925602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017216875,0.000009869617,0.00045651512,0.00014303412,0.0000048413526,0.00004490791,0.00794495,0.00014755467,0.00008792417,0.64394593,0.34717163,0.000025493035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36850384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38958594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6314962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032327898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03681063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7327178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W43601898","doi":"10.21991/c90080","title":"LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE PERSONS CASE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.043017311832716065,"score_gpt":0.28871949705185274,"score_spread":0.24570218521913667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W43601898","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039838634,0.0037295274,0.0060075023,0.3441212,0.0022140192,0.00012929547,0.0001488257,0.000048270762,0.6037628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87248,0.0025791388,0.0035207847,0.06996602,0.0033606105,0.00029169154,0.00008931326,0.000035631983,0.047676846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874473,0.005375248,0.00046683528,0.0014322441,0.002418459,0.002859946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98549783,0.010734982,0.00087788043,0.0007966366,0.0011063982,0.0009861685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01250149,0.00042289693,0.0010905551,0.0025195037,0.011402133,0.008037258,0.0034442672,0.022998223,0.014785567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03150299,0.0007027649,0.001745585,0.0012966057,0.016728153,0.009951051,0.005754959,0.013887098,0.0008637091],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030947635,0.000063284664,0.00030432307,0.000016811358,0.000010894103,0.0014299524,0.0011198572,0.0001917545,0.00008196372,0.9845145,0.0089765005,0.0032592781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012745913,0.000040736984,0.0011193973,0.0001624883,0.000060286548,0.0013273259,0.0036987315,0.00085218606,0.00039216352,0.8941569,0.09800979,0.000052578045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019487543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012911529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022998223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053366683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0078243725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06611502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W43694953","doi":"10.21991/c9gq1x","title":"POGG as a Basis for Federal Jurisdiction over Public Health Surveillance","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Public Health Policies and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public health; Jurisdiction; Public health surveillance; Environmental health; Public relations; Political science; Medicine; Business; Pathology; Law","score_opus":0.10983153204322824,"score_gpt":0.40649184085709583,"score_spread":0.2966603088138676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W43694953","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035142295,0.0024785667,0.025906492,0.4259488,0.004880112,0.00071074144,0.00076882174,0.0008887379,0.5032754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6880342,0.0011039848,0.028673418,0.13746339,0.0022274752,0.0008964747,0.0005611135,0.00040202792,0.14063796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95740485,0.016267663,0.002492935,0.0043031,0.010095231,0.009436184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9252882,0.03952486,0.0029075248,0.010815186,0.014947954,0.00651642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07896434,0.00048152325,0.0008440768,0.0030086106,0.013278942,0.014480615,0.0035505178,0.016964763,0.0115899965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07663967,0.0009553382,0.0009591422,0.002112791,0.013743717,0.0083978195,0.008767535,0.01600687,0.002067608],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004313391,0.000082118684,0.0013436449,0.000072649666,0.000014082249,0.00013406062,0.0038830466,0.00039465658,0.0007069624,0.9097551,0.06293362,0.020636939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000795773,0.00009276985,0.004667865,0.00046249235,0.00005656545,0.00013713476,0.0033093854,0.0016308945,0.0011314396,0.22814241,0.7601479,0.00014158427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09343564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09889539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09343564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01645969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07814086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41760832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379535875","doi":"10.21991/cf29451","title":"The Individual is Not the Institution: The Flawed Logic of the New Brunswick Court of Queen’s Bench Decision in Acadian Society of New Brunswick v Right Honourable Prime Minister of Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Queen (butterfly); Law; Governor; Economic Justice; Prime minister; Political science; Institution; Sociology; Government (linguistics); Management; Politics; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02616770001836521,"score_gpt":0.270404926613303,"score_spread":0.2442372265949378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379535875","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036772583,0.0067599583,0.0048524383,0.6560462,0.0037309225,0.00018954847,0.00042588564,0.000080332924,0.2911421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71263903,0.0028437213,0.0047642197,0.19160728,0.0010883034,0.00014836233,0.00013987164,0.00016528001,0.08660389],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9741192,0.008076112,0.0007468007,0.0037930624,0.0058168857,0.0074479077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98775905,0.004524028,0.00047266757,0.0006909509,0.003793853,0.0027593973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020037584,0.0005713644,0.000921882,0.0019336315,0.037357386,0.0274932,0.0052800765,0.016738307,0.004812764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025098706,0.0011126795,0.000685753,0.0028808606,0.056945246,0.0067882827,0.0048572975,0.026015991,0.0007146292],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017227887,0.0000077899085,0.0004932402,0.000017558214,0.00000867924,0.00015577218,0.0065622237,0.00012812713,0.00008234695,0.9626639,0.027712502,0.0021505975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016061275,0.000031541676,0.0030454725,0.0006355387,0.000089177156,0.000137431,0.026284067,0.001339987,0.0007460786,0.33905488,0.6281223,0.00035298345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97048753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98492044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1690494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1690494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21583813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96378493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379536055","doi":"10.21991/cf29455","title":"AB v Northwest Territories: A New Low for the Doré/Loyola Framework","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal processes and jurisprudence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Political science; Appeal; Context (archaeology); Statutory law; Administrative law; Judicial review; Constitutional law; Geography","score_opus":0.024298456288510968,"score_gpt":0.32002240555033484,"score_spread":0.2957239492618239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379536055","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014497047,0.007651722,0.027052399,0.19581091,0.002131577,0.00032188618,0.0005142665,0.00014112041,0.751879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6249489,0.0054220892,0.051881365,0.14585431,0.001665827,0.0013440601,0.00047728108,0.00031497833,0.16809116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.973955,0.008582381,0.0010911511,0.0049869623,0.007247743,0.0041367877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881632,0.004904547,0.0006208256,0.0013420111,0.003360786,0.0016086828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021742618,0.0007894221,0.0015457136,0.003169894,0.017242301,0.026313148,0.0045372946,0.016401408,0.005634188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01899764,0.0010020995,0.0011500727,0.0018215238,0.037006516,0.012632535,0.007913043,0.025303384,0.0009953433],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056699514,0.000007075034,0.00021372894,0.000016858123,0.0000022174856,0.000060147537,0.0009596244,0.00006078774,0.000045456723,0.98962855,0.006661489,0.0023384439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007330406,0.000032461416,0.0016226298,0.0010745364,0.00003507774,0.00024000405,0.004607626,0.0015153368,0.00030725423,0.5004379,0.48988202,0.00017179917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.59440607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7184443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40559393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04418571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06926282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8159651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379536362","doi":"10.21991/cf29454","title":"A Minimalistic Approach to Severing the British Royal Family from Canada’s Constitution","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Monarchy; Queen (butterfly); Constitution; Constitutional monarchy; Apprehension; Law; Dove; Ancient history; History; Genealogy; Political science; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024525444266615352,"score_gpt":0.2512212553217944,"score_spread":0.22669581105517905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379536362","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0738179,0.0015391511,0.095652275,0.06514763,0.0006684901,0.0006776872,0.0005022445,0.00018036223,0.76181424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9236083,0.00040190437,0.019071305,0.0038541318,0.0001043816,0.00028984578,0.0001500384,0.000042579974,0.052477438],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99401265,0.002216115,0.00018368497,0.00075116876,0.0015308358,0.0013055516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962859,0.0010431805,0.00020667375,0.00044566364,0.0015249598,0.0004936059],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00729441,0.00045126936,0.0005343457,0.0025468813,0.016475406,0.00868944,0.0020471322,0.0024062593,0.005892462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01207698,0.00029516584,0.00038555145,0.0018874964,0.024518233,0.003196669,0.0041462695,0.0058009923,0.0004599381],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069225975,0.0000054170937,0.00028821212,0.000014485204,0.000002938383,0.000034764504,0.0037035716,0.00031041668,0.00008505173,0.98923117,0.0026123745,0.0037045854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034533714,0.00002371049,0.0029189654,0.00027175448,0.00002671678,0.000095018135,0.010181721,0.0027467574,0.00043764064,0.7445063,0.23869653,0.000060323233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.840057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8994011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15994298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06436136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11689486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46697658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379536749","doi":"10.21991/cf29453","title":"Federalism and the Paramountcy Doctrine","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Supreme court; Political science; Federalism; Law; Trilogy; Subject (documents); Constitutional law; Computer science","score_opus":0.021516869922301333,"score_gpt":0.2927423745499602,"score_spread":0.2712255046276589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379536749","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03278218,0.009268644,0.035628397,0.06773736,0.0008422087,0.00007448573,0.00019408773,0.00008126863,0.8533914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9518165,0.0023771117,0.007027349,0.009799165,0.00073343155,0.0000900847,0.0000756751,0.00003715491,0.028043533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99592906,0.0012550562,0.00013283224,0.0007851825,0.0009696871,0.000928102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847823,0.0006335504,0.00016107681,0.00023874703,0.00031898197,0.00016943687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004719881,0.00023841507,0.00046775522,0.0010099121,0.008306351,0.006007285,0.0008676842,0.0040699597,0.0033032354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052787196,0.0002719878,0.00060933403,0.0011362593,0.03168676,0.0032451537,0.003054963,0.0068879123,0.0004265233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.782285e-7,5.233282e-7,0.000021775679,0.0000014375154,4.5396482e-7,0.0000038461144,0.0000855105,0.000033759912,0.000007262274,0.999073,0.00042899876,0.00034282185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008502306,0.0000044749,0.0002996969,0.00003301034,0.0000037891448,0.000019142783,0.000095822405,0.00024061627,0.00006158814,0.9561704,0.043056156,0.000006916163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10244664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.087226786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10244664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015514437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016959151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20370066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387080849","doi":"10.21991/cf29456","title":"Patriation and Section 35: The Role of Allan Blakeney in Securing Indigenous Rights","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Section (typography); Negotiation; Politics; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Indigenous rights; Sociology; Business; Philosophy","score_opus":0.007495786203037256,"score_gpt":0.22140704888286394,"score_spread":0.21391126267982669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387080849","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.568938,0.004367006,0.0036116606,0.04766829,0.0002931658,0.00012088419,0.00004938622,0.00005426426,0.3748972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9716158,0.0005137447,0.0007830553,0.0029435514,0.000014901458,0.000011861153,0.0000065772992,0.000008965272,0.024101626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934861,0.0012536588,0.00010704591,0.0005191114,0.0011951138,0.0034390124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972747,0.0009907691,0.00023547263,0.00013581259,0.0006799845,0.000683137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005536409,0.00021876708,0.00024029988,0.0006861139,0.023277761,0.0074865455,0.001103713,0.0030769433,0.0023692395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005309349,0.00027237137,0.00021028613,0.0009435329,0.031505972,0.002358057,0.0040928368,0.0054487376,0.00012856441],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040274666,0.000024943702,0.0077527026,0.00008176386,0.000011232634,0.0010490265,0.17764331,0.00041238774,0.0017206356,0.78862405,0.0050050337,0.01763462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003442456,0.00012264306,0.055873223,0.0004777151,0.00006359677,0.00084914494,0.22946645,0.0007331489,0.0029101681,0.07292417,0.63628453,0.00026071616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9417251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9796932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058274925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05552385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.116857186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40285563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387080944","doi":"10.21991/cf29457","title":"Patriation Paradigms: Sovereignty, Power, and Rights","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Empowerment; State (computer science); Power (physics); Political science; Politics; Corporate governance; Self-determination; Law and economics; Human rights; Popular sovereignty; Law; Political economy; Sociology; Public administration; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.025985326555644526,"score_gpt":0.30840832424303694,"score_spread":0.28242299768739243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387080944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045813456,0.009465102,0.084666416,0.09588796,0.000801149,0.00007692853,0.000042150463,0.00008049671,0.76316637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96430933,0.0023972408,0.009026107,0.003663868,0.00043027135,0.00015087001,0.00002725999,0.000062799496,0.019932166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99072075,0.005627849,0.00022488381,0.0009551388,0.0016334259,0.0008378504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99554646,0.0027721594,0.00035672545,0.0005995135,0.0003983085,0.0003267815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009748286,0.0004907617,0.00057789235,0.0018761721,0.0091533605,0.011267811,0.0015862762,0.004182683,0.0040841578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00751615,0.00026509629,0.0005190003,0.0018621224,0.098547645,0.015610913,0.009229554,0.009878241,0.0004918278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.1279416e-7,0.0000011793738,0.000013752012,0.0000041908725,3.5252654e-7,0.000008637593,0.0018648308,0.000018380582,0.000009943601,0.99731725,0.00013899908,0.0006216263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048824404,0.0000067275846,0.00006676074,0.00006520683,0.000001483958,0.000054602708,0.0022436695,0.00018274091,0.000059816666,0.9596254,0.037683357,0.0000053452845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00655016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058059962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011267811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009285517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076350207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06737149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387081316","doi":"10.21991/cf29458","title":"Is Canadian Constitutional Law Canadian?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Law; International law; Constitutional law; Political science; Comparative law; Municipal law; Public law; Warrant; Common law; Economics","score_opus":0.03660565353978708,"score_gpt":0.28707364655266465,"score_spread":0.2504679930128776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387081316","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019920839,0.027443627,0.001141348,0.44449764,0.0039343024,0.000052749252,0.0012096236,0.00009313518,0.5017066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6773084,0.029696776,0.002391304,0.11838915,0.001617379,0.00007875502,0.0010829555,0.00016573422,0.16926953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921618,0.000539898,0.0001431379,0.0013135441,0.003376085,0.0024655757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99188644,0.0016279666,0.00026479678,0.0003172668,0.004550481,0.0013530927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038302084,0.0003505029,0.000609113,0.0035591573,0.032579094,0.016879022,0.0019942247,0.004493473,0.018967364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014389441,0.0003845706,0.00050572713,0.0068623773,0.023494473,0.0052652285,0.0028391895,0.0057730465,0.0011454517],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019682911,0.000007698227,0.0019049742,0.00008619989,0.000009847431,0.00015368727,0.005447147,0.00007628561,0.000079957754,0.81398296,0.1587917,0.019439874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012214107,0.0000051840248,0.0049082,0.00025210765,0.000016730231,0.000103903905,0.009661621,0.00010612858,0.00010540577,0.03843625,0.9463376,0.00005466732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9884809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9917361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86213756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13786244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17729992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W438974347","doi":"10.21991/c9md46","title":"STEPPING STONE OR PYRRHIC VICTORY? REFORM AND THE REFERENDUM","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Victory; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.08239641416404406,"score_gpt":0.23550377978804346,"score_spread":0.1531073656239994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W438974347","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044878352,0.009043919,0.0052105845,0.14008963,0.0017651833,0.000052784042,0.000059755996,0.000062651285,0.7988371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95498776,0.0008860492,0.0005787387,0.008552975,0.0006851005,0.0000602603,0.000016863092,0.000044705273,0.034187518],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890732,0.0056581865,0.00023048716,0.001332013,0.0015428769,0.0021631266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972283,0.0012364625,0.00025105817,0.0005887921,0.00035550466,0.00033985148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008927857,0.00041283178,0.0010014871,0.0013836629,0.012949878,0.013511682,0.0016958863,0.008754268,0.008369943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013663414,0.00036472583,0.0004888004,0.0014935547,0.043722115,0.010221141,0.007994594,0.010804374,0.0007658493],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038217654,0.0000038548637,0.000013919667,0.0000041059784,9.2310063e-7,0.000006517319,0.000689365,0.000020982,0.000011241861,0.99752,0.0011724744,0.0005526587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035962847,0.00002405996,0.0003348887,0.000087387685,0.000009350619,0.000027433087,0.0032737213,0.00019834915,0.00020837307,0.87635493,0.11942477,0.000020771979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014148602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010668846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014148602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011887708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009469423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.086251795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391717944","doi":"10.21991/cf29462","title":"Overturning Ford","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of New South Wales","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.024098358738546686,"score_gpt":0.2906612662100572,"score_spread":0.2665629074715105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391717944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09926809,0.006250574,0.010270942,0.1521967,0.0061076484,0.00026193284,0.0004514577,0.00025431212,0.7249383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66201895,0.0013743204,0.0039923606,0.08231175,0.00050609553,0.0000951692,0.00012731354,0.00007282485,0.24950126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99203193,0.00093195733,0.00022924159,0.0016145388,0.0024178275,0.002774539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957385,0.0012962011,0.0001831794,0.00044726295,0.0018366737,0.00049822655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063584107,0.00035938786,0.0004632779,0.0008885387,0.013492564,0.0061564455,0.0014014776,0.008020932,0.0059844134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012242208,0.00038731695,0.000598699,0.0006541967,0.011567388,0.0030837974,0.0024072828,0.010924038,0.00081520324],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032056465,0.000023861632,0.0017899675,0.000047018097,0.000009862939,0.00037068847,0.0035152775,0.0003726786,0.0006621759,0.9296855,0.048884463,0.014606418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052352287,0.00007774133,0.005720513,0.00024371919,0.0000368622,0.00016044675,0.0021375364,0.00069109077,0.0015463786,0.065761276,0.923455,0.00011709097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87793773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90551513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87793773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042818587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06389295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3106721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391718402","doi":"10.21991/cf29460","title":"Federalism and the Notwithstanding Clause","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Dependent clause; Political science; Linguistics; Law; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.018981790985853446,"score_gpt":0.29619451181305007,"score_spread":0.2772127208271966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391718402","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04426967,0.0030281455,0.007878144,0.05174833,0.00035638883,0.00003509571,0.00013351499,0.000045018034,0.89250565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94956046,0.00095719803,0.00141273,0.009990779,0.00021619796,0.000049476475,0.00006607439,0.00002234563,0.037724696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966394,0.00081565214,0.000060795177,0.00040738002,0.0007301376,0.0013466413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986266,0.00058405835,0.0001027364,0.00019045555,0.0003782849,0.00011785134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032493176,0.00015617687,0.0002892982,0.00073185755,0.0095380545,0.0047914204,0.00077609846,0.003306845,0.005824795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054133865,0.00018838226,0.00041767853,0.0009525987,0.011283089,0.00256956,0.0019776197,0.0054330467,0.00030294454],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017771852,0.0000010568286,0.00005017234,0.0000014784166,6.2273733e-7,0.0000091227475,0.00012059721,0.000045028057,0.000016770533,0.9981066,0.0009933106,0.0006533371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022589975,0.000011116964,0.0016697273,0.00006809492,0.000016126522,0.000043652373,0.000630562,0.000709319,0.0002580876,0.85601974,0.14053331,0.000017759658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3207305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33835325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3207305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014837384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016290767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63772726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391718414","doi":"10.21991/cf29465","title":"Weaving Section 33 into the Charter Project","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Weaving; Section (typography); Charter; Political science; Computer science; Engineering; Law; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.022622506655428528,"score_gpt":0.3215545900362177,"score_spread":0.2989320833807892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391718414","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.093171485,0.00186292,0.21000434,0.06363655,0.0035581267,0.0014051495,0.000263947,0.0009873849,0.6251101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8525002,0.0007593223,0.05044906,0.008918332,0.0006641398,0.00068787596,0.00014132945,0.0003109309,0.08556889],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98626155,0.0067187785,0.00054409704,0.0016413066,0.0027754148,0.002058857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9814291,0.010320787,0.0019664553,0.0029296016,0.0021542136,0.0011998914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023067173,0.00031919812,0.000320749,0.0018147307,0.00576512,0.0072113476,0.0010679257,0.0038348255,0.010129733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032846436,0.00046723182,0.00043637227,0.0012078466,0.008467565,0.0068165646,0.0058396505,0.0063037397,0.0013989939],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019554356,0.000020640284,0.0007960488,0.000034253666,0.0000031208594,0.00019294709,0.00411583,0.00033718205,0.0007155153,0.9665826,0.00626582,0.02091639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042255273,0.00019815388,0.0040051574,0.0004072445,0.000031365893,0.0002947021,0.0045212572,0.0013753714,0.0028968293,0.33826062,0.64783424,0.00013282872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008344261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0110002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023067173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003467033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0212537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12199235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391719412","doi":"10.21991/cf29463","title":"Ford Focus","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Focus (optics); Computer science; Physics; Optics","score_opus":0.025579660216631994,"score_gpt":0.29700935626768393,"score_spread":0.27142969605105194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391719412","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011032991,0.0026040915,0.00040542532,0.020644616,0.0022952398,0.00004463778,0.0017319126,0.00015952085,0.9710113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00799857,0.0014619633,0.00024654897,0.004963328,0.0003108831,0.000024152525,0.0006055917,0.000114874696,0.9842741],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984818,0.00007613395,0.000027325983,0.00027557393,0.0006608104,0.0004783305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825853,0.00018652696,0.000042345815,0.00011226985,0.0007186367,0.0006817022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093360734,0.00053722184,0.0003685935,0.0017750291,0.009781876,0.007226812,0.0014871584,0.0030283832,0.440585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027173117,0.0003044716,0.0003497067,0.0023027598,0.0013801891,0.0022986191,0.0026533091,0.0032267512,0.11161262],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012505119,0.000011965036,0.0002999606,0.00006888969,0.0000018398074,0.00013051566,0.0005285768,0.00003203546,0.00013891092,0.12608448,0.85022664,0.022463705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.2208023e-7,8.5222547e-7,0.00015067664,0.000015969517,5.078389e-7,0.000014458729,0.00012583131,0.000005001971,0.00002331909,0.00054034794,0.9991208,0.0000014277822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47011885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6579306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47011885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023616541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030332638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391719420","doi":"10.21991/cf29466","title":"Editorial Introduction","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Energy Law and Policy","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.03827895529080743,"score_gpt":0.34684443675335475,"score_spread":0.3085654814625473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391719420","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000057892223,0.0013313212,0.0001821004,0.02154612,0.9701322,0.000029317736,0.00013883306,0.00010175247,0.0064804135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010575335,0.00257001,0.0002547884,0.022999302,0.9362781,0.000054201668,0.00022656533,0.00015018847,0.03640926],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958437,0.0004941079,0.0004100561,0.0007801083,0.002024359,0.00044774447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97988486,0.0041414257,0.001270778,0.0008236259,0.010984356,0.0028950009],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041095507,0.0019624038,0.0014934792,0.0033701677,0.0030150926,0.007259506,0.0021789414,0.00552329,0.08968353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025592614,0.0006004468,0.0016306838,0.0010948245,0.0011820084,0.0031828724,0.0021463507,0.008289144,0.045200426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017190472,0.0000059743506,0.000026733516,0.00008761027,0.000003435358,0.000047278067,0.000012294631,0.000014493663,0.000046345944,0.0003240259,0.99255776,0.0068567805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014636932,0.00002001219,0.00017572872,0.00018774996,0.0000083405,0.000091524715,0.000043859676,0.000053310192,0.000091868824,0.000800858,0.99850214,0.0000101290125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008285855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001836395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08968353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019163716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032746273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3000213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391722319","doi":"10.21991/cf29461","title":"The Notwithstanding Clause and the Precedent in Ford","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Establishment Clause; Dependent clause; Political science; Law; Philosophy; First amendment; Supreme court; Sentence","score_opus":0.01674805123274219,"score_gpt":0.29944425927798124,"score_spread":0.28269620804523904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391722319","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09309616,0.0058159595,0.017266892,0.07262772,0.0013473819,0.00007767376,0.0001442835,0.000051158822,0.8095727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9456321,0.0012235407,0.0028014784,0.01070001,0.00030798718,0.000054791228,0.000055616285,0.000026077569,0.039198384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950865,0.0016862572,0.00024797226,0.0007650791,0.0010911467,0.0011231534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99535626,0.0033342447,0.00022290059,0.00044186626,0.0004968443,0.00014779762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006362081,0.00020454571,0.0004660288,0.0007528404,0.007652371,0.004838629,0.0012667008,0.005966663,0.0038285316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011566988,0.0003398468,0.00045547503,0.0010851419,0.0195092,0.006121676,0.002218044,0.0065165353,0.00027807604],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021765209,0.0000012813056,0.00007098163,0.000004509559,3.7172052e-7,0.000023447943,0.00042393216,0.00002842545,0.000019171632,0.99766797,0.0009640599,0.00079363736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002848608,0.000023639335,0.001002309,0.00017919052,0.000012835287,0.00017479486,0.0021819032,0.00045856764,0.0004632829,0.7000353,0.2954071,0.0000326908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060629427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07124996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9910917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008908276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008368396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.120553076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391722850","doi":"10.21991/cf29459","title":"Special Issue Foreward: The Notwithstanding Clause","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019536497854231283,"score_gpt":0.2996018085127713,"score_spread":0.28006531065854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391722850","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023478307,0.014899112,0.0018583225,0.2191008,0.12052697,0.00019759755,0.0016652058,0.0005209106,0.63888323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02765883,0.005742135,0.0011201783,0.15450054,0.0389359,0.00011479204,0.0008971778,0.0005131623,0.7705173],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99607337,0.0002315816,0.0001526547,0.00049601635,0.002224475,0.00082179846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959871,0.00095550023,0.000117897755,0.00035129825,0.0022167433,0.00037149354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002334184,0.0006944775,0.0009526296,0.0013931912,0.008113503,0.0084960535,0.0026142374,0.0100601865,0.05173417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009986879,0.00056083343,0.00097239524,0.0012094969,0.0039165365,0.0037035914,0.0026132367,0.012796818,0.014274398],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012534884,0.000011000653,0.00014830657,0.00006376707,0.00000406611,0.00009882768,0.00025016651,0.00003351132,0.0002612443,0.08031639,0.91105926,0.0077410014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045800894,0.0000068795102,0.00053563534,0.00006605989,0.0000055402866,0.00003735771,0.00011112649,0.00003794854,0.00011445083,0.0047569503,0.9943131,0.000010308475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34709492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48537084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34709492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010541005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023163589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6901492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391723063","doi":"10.21991/cf29464","title":"Notwithstanding Minority Rights","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Minority Rights and Languages","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Minority rights; Human rights; Law","score_opus":0.020740153340512508,"score_gpt":0.30256977484136527,"score_spread":0.2818296215008528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391723063","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0132371485,0.0034083992,0.0037210826,0.21579826,0.0036422212,0.000102910904,0.00072903425,0.00018365336,0.7591773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28521264,0.0015173273,0.0018967468,0.1902204,0.0014486752,0.00012797548,0.0002499605,0.00012478938,0.51920146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963272,0.0006031303,0.00009647813,0.0006295717,0.0010044579,0.0013391476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99762887,0.0007001027,0.00012596857,0.00037688587,0.00095291715,0.00021530804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036162215,0.00041252334,0.00041604647,0.00038408753,0.009613592,0.005118605,0.002098219,0.009012082,0.022209981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061011463,0.00022620716,0.00058948377,0.00042777497,0.008541346,0.0023854407,0.002592995,0.007316061,0.0035773797],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015431786,0.000008811436,0.00047265535,0.00004623485,0.000005487313,0.00016030559,0.00482626,0.00006097456,0.00045439997,0.86441463,0.119630866,0.009903853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068713625,0.000010149813,0.0011048969,0.00011595237,0.000007624191,0.00009959542,0.0015733545,0.0001123206,0.00044903185,0.022661734,0.9738374,0.00002095928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5275205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6913393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5275205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010638654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015134047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9505241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395042016","doi":"10.21991/cf29471","title":"The Legal Status of LGBTQ+ in China: A Law and Politics Perspective","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; China; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Law; Legal status; Computer science","score_opus":0.016677630531536345,"score_gpt":0.3368973636416486,"score_spread":0.3202197331101122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395042016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8760857,0.0043736887,0.001145229,0.028294777,0.00016962108,0.000058362322,0.0001344289,0.000017577979,0.089720614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993127,0.0011629967,0.00021618011,0.0010429828,0.00005362905,0.000022015154,0.00003293219,0.0000026711793,0.004339635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987231,0.00035611735,0.000059145972,0.00011787824,0.00022516206,0.00051864254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988336,0.00042660887,0.00025457644,0.000062876075,0.00014514629,0.00027723232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021166913,0.00018496702,0.0002195649,0.0028538378,0.0068059587,0.004322635,0.00066963024,0.0012724639,0.0034194381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002029111,0.00018286477,0.00019105183,0.0024818953,0.010989471,0.0023459196,0.0024004756,0.0014206561,0.00010761276],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003022048,0.000068568144,0.103168584,0.00023698315,0.000018454815,0.0012461616,0.08161056,0.0005155349,0.0023025977,0.76878214,0.004008966,0.038011122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003061931,0.00017598434,0.48921552,0.0010742107,0.000058671372,0.00081569114,0.1744812,0.0038961256,0.002498606,0.14004298,0.1875415,0.00016888212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14347266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1800169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14347266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010534304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013137237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28527516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395042052","doi":"10.21991/cf29470","title":"How Does it Feel to be a Problem? Inclusion and Exclusion and Quebec’s Bill 21","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Inclusion–exclusion principle; Sociology; Political science; Law; Gender studies; Politics","score_opus":0.020985966368786118,"score_gpt":0.28773468486640646,"score_spread":0.26674871849762033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395042052","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24143602,0.002752886,0.0011421097,0.39245486,0.000967716,0.00007109726,0.0003323589,0.0000626995,0.36078024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8771938,0.0004495291,0.00037676858,0.034233853,0.00010538809,0.00004853053,0.00007565647,0.000036877576,0.08747956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933617,0.0015964301,0.000088562556,0.00036069634,0.0019003602,0.0026921474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957153,0.0012205557,0.00025431984,0.00017258512,0.001362834,0.0012743184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004927266,0.00019717882,0.00034159745,0.00070296245,0.027318258,0.010272315,0.0014461584,0.004654626,0.007930526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072094295,0.00023465899,0.0004209888,0.000991898,0.015357047,0.0022959558,0.0031601936,0.00620564,0.0004026545],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007181649,0.00007831814,0.015160695,0.00006728666,0.000024497353,0.00096830796,0.060500186,0.0004120919,0.0006888826,0.7503243,0.14143823,0.030265296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047645462,0.00005311815,0.04781132,0.00026212202,0.000031882853,0.0001778532,0.06649005,0.00064051675,0.00051363313,0.031935304,0.85186034,0.0001761915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9812165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9903374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08610863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08610863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10094626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6247648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395042089","doi":"10.21991/cf29468","title":"R v Sharma’s “Clarification” of the Section 15 Framework and its Creation of Unique Barriers for Disability-Based Equality Claims","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Mental Health Association","keywords":"Section (typography); Computer science; Sociology; Mathematical economics; Law and economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04243532506218678,"score_gpt":0.35558708865202476,"score_spread":0.313151763589838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395042089","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059601024,0.0065044225,0.04922567,0.2539992,0.01565449,0.00033861824,0.00028055016,0.0002962881,0.61409986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72251123,0.0022007895,0.027630769,0.18179862,0.0026731344,0.00048706797,0.00006436598,0.00013943324,0.062494658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97008723,0.011207534,0.0025939331,0.004343733,0.008745284,0.0030223397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96400285,0.027397674,0.0015810758,0.0020491492,0.0040729707,0.00089640997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02242229,0.00076608796,0.00082512666,0.0016253857,0.0085823,0.011153013,0.0032767102,0.021165753,0.0033066862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05230082,0.00093956955,0.0019067244,0.0010080338,0.026950654,0.0083502885,0.01176621,0.03199255,0.0011610886],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012556657,0.000008908666,0.00016321175,0.00004490626,0.000005269142,0.00011817005,0.0029842374,0.00012893736,0.00024775282,0.98300165,0.009752555,0.0035317992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006482795,0.00019248339,0.0014535611,0.00084783044,0.0001110005,0.001273108,0.0033214483,0.0016875205,0.005522839,0.5373253,0.44768152,0.0005185835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015121622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016618025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98487836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050131897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0152521515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11858177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395042680","doi":"10.21991/cf29472","title":"Comparative Constitutional Design: Northern Stagnation, Southern Innovation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic stagnation; Geography; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.06425865409382112,"score_gpt":0.3219219051417255,"score_spread":0.25766325104790433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395042680","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.077075236,0.013029239,0.04283296,0.0593837,0.00058148155,0.00004934195,0.00010320323,0.00015825922,0.8067866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9707954,0.0021499833,0.0064688055,0.0024463509,0.00027008817,0.000076182965,0.000049661925,0.00008505319,0.017658493],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99185854,0.0056871334,0.00014046235,0.0010725666,0.0008919203,0.0003494179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99444455,0.0034601858,0.00032568382,0.001109677,0.00043812883,0.00022186206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014441844,0.00022681877,0.00070962444,0.0015478248,0.0058622058,0.009248003,0.0008882724,0.0017458709,0.009124184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012640086,0.00019755782,0.00027940533,0.0020616504,0.029561518,0.0077109123,0.004323998,0.0030003379,0.00051166036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034189773,0.0000019006693,0.00010722328,0.000015472573,0.0000010734707,0.000007771955,0.0014572431,0.000055691136,0.00003968487,0.99310136,0.0005650054,0.004644059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011028763,0.000023409113,0.0008654379,0.00012730827,0.000008417955,0.000063087,0.00271206,0.0004054385,0.0003426618,0.8697227,0.12571174,0.000006668136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032540516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055788485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014441844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008055884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055018645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07637668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395048310","doi":"10.21991/cf29467","title":"Editorial Introduction","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science","score_opus":0.015231513895649548,"score_gpt":0.281960348890499,"score_spread":0.26672883499484945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395048310","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000052676285,0.0012720885,0.00014865235,0.018972302,0.96888757,0.000040475337,0.00020382881,0.00014370459,0.010278688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00096922636,0.002474409,0.00024354007,0.020944443,0.9180154,0.000078101235,0.00030174194,0.0002485394,0.056724504],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99475586,0.0006039724,0.00047771342,0.0009105324,0.0027137126,0.00053834426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97563666,0.00418715,0.0015958635,0.0010354586,0.013738854,0.003806017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004835228,0.0023939721,0.0016388594,0.0041477205,0.0037989588,0.008687083,0.0023368562,0.006062985,0.14788625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02820352,0.00072723284,0.0016070909,0.001525724,0.0012393107,0.0037824558,0.0025317133,0.008199523,0.07792455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013829723,0.0000054905904,0.000021289577,0.00008014942,0.0000023107377,0.000035132023,0.000010952509,0.000011310453,0.000036995436,0.00025109918,0.9942145,0.0053170393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011975351,0.000016864695,0.000144286,0.00017366742,0.0000054053844,0.00005475758,0.00004144616,0.000039149192,0.000061924206,0.000540441,0.9989008,0.000009227299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001004467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023215262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14788625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002437892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038846775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4947288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395048323","doi":"10.21991/cf29469","title":"Abortion Rights Without Law: A Constitutional Reflection","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutional law; Abortion; Political science; Law; Reflection (computer programming); Computer science; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.023635029024650367,"score_gpt":0.3222993437780244,"score_spread":0.298664314753374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395048323","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015815565,0.004782523,0.002730728,0.74384296,0.0020307412,0.00005662183,0.00026846805,0.000064861866,0.23040755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6337702,0.004702715,0.004304767,0.26225662,0.0014379937,0.00007685912,0.00017620278,0.00012758654,0.09314706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98464495,0.002544728,0.0004005619,0.0018007151,0.0058859503,0.004722965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904917,0.003948242,0.0003215439,0.0005609493,0.0029396801,0.0017378951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0142502235,0.0005135902,0.0007070303,0.00170237,0.028821139,0.019992616,0.004377475,0.01861974,0.0077703423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019646635,0.0005907166,0.0008255144,0.0019536084,0.06998222,0.008236168,0.0055215717,0.027694264,0.0006106732],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043356486,0.000008653259,0.00018434522,0.000012850061,0.0000034535867,0.000075704644,0.00458905,0.00012368683,0.00010095718,0.97599256,0.01662281,0.0022815748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046985406,0.000017168848,0.0018638743,0.00024001073,0.000033790013,0.00009681615,0.014996506,0.00071793917,0.0004662097,0.29800147,0.6833835,0.00013570134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97433996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9759477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97433996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1503743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22049841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9854454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403728798","doi":"10.21991/cf29477","title":"The Puzzle and Promise of Human Dignity: R v Bissonnette","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.030429458967036686,"score_gpt":0.3182835016711685,"score_spread":0.2878540427041318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403728798","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028594326,0.012674545,0.005115789,0.46665663,0.00222187,0.00008481212,0.00009300924,0.00008654479,0.48447242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6433594,0.0059529617,0.006964966,0.16679767,0.0004187533,0.000116415904,0.00004671619,0.00012815182,0.17621498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910322,0.0028721034,0.0003752964,0.0015494833,0.0026131477,0.0015576876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956891,0.0022932622,0.00018692683,0.0002914444,0.0008755643,0.0006636606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008282228,0.00029750288,0.0005760067,0.0005479429,0.012566297,0.009526269,0.0017982664,0.012561234,0.0041025607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014341343,0.00035429717,0.00035474973,0.00060165295,0.024536118,0.005138273,0.005246969,0.013533652,0.0005734149],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000755771,0.000004879657,0.00021684925,0.000027676162,0.0000022731979,0.00016323978,0.0049920585,0.00006727761,0.00009393904,0.9692821,0.018246569,0.006895676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017859658,0.000036879872,0.0010149648,0.0005407789,0.000015638529,0.0003950922,0.014379683,0.0004147051,0.00046961693,0.29355142,0.6890443,0.00011910748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.53179663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6129669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46820337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016823478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04302395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9419214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403728899","doi":"10.21991/cf29478","title":"A Promising Piece of the Puzzle: Human Dignity and the Role of Section 1 of the Charter","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Dignity; Section (typography); History; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.016127653866552173,"score_gpt":0.27468008543169004,"score_spread":0.25855243156513785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403728899","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01566634,0.011231115,0.008900546,0.8077729,0.01118942,0.00004451306,0.000097918884,0.00007331604,0.14502396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5902812,0.010673096,0.011307893,0.2858893,0.011470761,0.00016915733,0.00013712973,0.00017026583,0.08990124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969308,0.0015961594,0.00010252917,0.00043437377,0.0004396542,0.0004965305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958306,0.0029678247,0.00021054705,0.00027347272,0.00045295095,0.00026445917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004861552,0.0003944295,0.00044244403,0.00054600503,0.004983135,0.008583014,0.0015463413,0.00706118,0.0061866306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009791164,0.00018279608,0.00056830095,0.0004499232,0.014686848,0.008078933,0.0034224356,0.012025035,0.0007339994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001711604,0.000010808281,0.00023920122,0.000046264864,0.000002875294,0.00011697806,0.0035782284,0.00007166113,0.00016793514,0.95090544,0.036907207,0.007936289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018463375,0.000109133405,0.0012160504,0.00053179136,0.000016301829,0.00026388647,0.008675901,0.000326641,0.00052617205,0.38279328,0.6054567,0.00006569124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008907527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0143602695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99109244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033053413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005033971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025710642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403728913","doi":"10.21991/cf29476","title":"From Gross Disproportionality to Human Dignity: Redefining Section 12 in the Context of Mandatory Minimum Sentences","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Dignity; Context (archaeology); Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Geography; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.034615523784844046,"score_gpt":0.3237946074599685,"score_spread":0.28917908367512446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403728913","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10560042,0.0077833063,0.16560614,0.115216404,0.0061425134,0.00024220037,0.00021928569,0.00024738893,0.59894234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91090214,0.0017647698,0.018836193,0.03331308,0.0022731062,0.00037320063,0.000080542355,0.000114619055,0.032342315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877511,0.0058652996,0.0005290987,0.0014466387,0.002611871,0.0017959108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99123293,0.005841017,0.0007902815,0.0006779682,0.0010965801,0.00036127417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012498006,0.0004671365,0.00055368955,0.0009427646,0.0046680286,0.007224178,0.002162322,0.007141078,0.00341975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019320354,0.00037766562,0.0010562415,0.0004834782,0.01709787,0.0067620957,0.005147573,0.012289817,0.0005591377],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007419166,0.0000052015744,0.00016592887,0.0000194805,0.0000024475755,0.000079825964,0.0007804881,0.00021335375,0.000098902696,0.9942123,0.0022095847,0.0022050317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018508814,0.0001237786,0.0015954584,0.00042112044,0.000028965289,0.00021785984,0.0010226271,0.0016392147,0.0009372058,0.8866635,0.107254185,0.00007765365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066833035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008898418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9933167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004201324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00681085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066096544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403729115","doi":"10.21991/cf29474","title":"The Place of Gladue in Constitutional Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.016706125249959868,"score_gpt":0.2963097214409912,"score_spread":0.27960359619103137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403729115","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04058061,0.013838874,0.088676125,0.1296768,0.0015439896,0.000103679464,0.0001899338,0.00029790186,0.7250921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9412621,0.002322249,0.011950683,0.018377429,0.0008911447,0.00021179263,0.000054962467,0.00011123379,0.024818445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98272127,0.00838314,0.0006382804,0.0033787678,0.0028148424,0.0020637023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98607975,0.009376278,0.00055525807,0.0020506212,0.001173501,0.0007645852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024381848,0.00040389813,0.00079705194,0.0018031149,0.012316078,0.018511137,0.0024406791,0.009254424,0.0040383404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026155043,0.0007767832,0.0007611013,0.0015226383,0.09771367,0.012267391,0.008377106,0.01735064,0.0005991628],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013939346,0.0000015039075,0.000024112253,0.0000039082192,5.026642e-7,0.00000647561,0.00046008683,0.0000443636,0.000013803598,0.9980737,0.00033949417,0.0010305869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018765393,0.000017735398,0.00019242425,0.00009493333,0.0000054345646,0.000030491354,0.00046105715,0.0003310143,0.0001175149,0.93674815,0.06195515,0.00002733986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.072260596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046648894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9277394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024043478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020046609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17444843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403729234","doi":"10.21991/cf29475","title":"Legislative Context in Sentencing: A Closer Look at R v Sharma","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Context (archaeology); Political science; Sentencing guidelines; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Linguistics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.029011147646927353,"score_gpt":0.3132181404770611,"score_spread":0.28420699283013373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403729234","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0809465,0.01941511,0.0050169807,0.07180535,0.0018806298,0.000098587385,0.000077938705,0.00005853551,0.82070035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9343638,0.007976617,0.002257224,0.015695376,0.0009677344,0.00008213066,0.000031520653,0.0000792848,0.03854623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9835276,0.010458448,0.00037989358,0.00097056513,0.0025715465,0.0020920415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99438536,0.0039373897,0.0003001183,0.00020948156,0.0008931421,0.00027443055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063170395,0.00025426134,0.00068159093,0.0019299862,0.011981267,0.008522231,0.0018406706,0.0047847247,0.005853636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012591913,0.00047204358,0.0006339261,0.0017007638,0.010230311,0.005440846,0.0044991467,0.00823148,0.00069489627],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012679309,0.000021306425,0.00048826553,0.00011385496,0.000007736447,0.00047177437,0.01667962,0.00037103205,0.00030485186,0.9675934,0.005211818,0.008723672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025739027,0.00022610957,0.013641706,0.0012355528,0.000101325604,0.0011401654,0.058074646,0.0019258991,0.0013082861,0.26611435,0.65597296,0.00023315038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11603012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20687933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8839699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012513005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01626824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2307095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404584955","doi":"10.21991/cf29481","title":"R v Lufiau, R v Varennes, and The Gamble of Litigating a “Right” to Jury Trials Outside of Section 11(f)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Law; Charter; Political science; Section (typography); Conversation; Supreme court; Framing (construction); Sociology; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.03014268201789548,"score_gpt":0.3195374123099204,"score_spread":0.2893947302920249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404584955","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050624564,0.010350221,0.008194651,0.48750988,0.0024867102,0.000086890854,0.00008526202,0.00020377693,0.44045794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7490738,0.0017063925,0.0036873247,0.197743,0.0014638642,0.0002399842,0.000026725553,0.000095647665,0.04596328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98320794,0.0078025167,0.00054869894,0.0024665694,0.0033118404,0.002662573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852652,0.011893846,0.0006937691,0.0006098875,0.00096749776,0.00056985335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019794602,0.00044686327,0.00085239887,0.0015957367,0.012531495,0.010943535,0.0024514825,0.029645491,0.0032095388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035910416,0.0005641758,0.0010820605,0.0007281177,0.026253602,0.005899796,0.0050886315,0.015691876,0.0006457274],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016134274,0.000008207091,0.0003044073,0.000018150806,0.0000045929246,0.00017216308,0.0015741056,0.00013908435,0.000069808455,0.9770328,0.01721989,0.0034407869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067966124,0.000115589144,0.002488872,0.0005150439,0.00006042934,0.0006576314,0.0040597767,0.0014225505,0.00089574355,0.6837233,0.30580303,0.00019023397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06938454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.076627664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06938454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0097750565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0153657375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13796139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404585783","doi":"10.21991/cf29482","title":"The Prudent Parliament and Section 24(1)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Section (typography); Political science; Computer science; Law; Operating system; Politics","score_opus":0.018328256684608444,"score_gpt":0.2984950539539075,"score_spread":0.28016679726929905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404585783","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045741346,0.0036710836,0.005068171,0.09315629,0.0022927658,0.00027363343,0.00044266914,0.00015656336,0.8491974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71075577,0.0006710717,0.0040961667,0.049620505,0.0010199185,0.0003126982,0.00013051806,0.00007075938,0.2333227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99009806,0.0020454733,0.00045827506,0.0018714372,0.0028263412,0.002700419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99550605,0.0020620339,0.0005188904,0.0005555714,0.0008410062,0.0005164111],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067193694,0.00032762554,0.00042369304,0.0006507241,0.009861866,0.009220607,0.0015273192,0.015500242,0.0058121793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01230639,0.00071196246,0.0004990558,0.00059774483,0.014757989,0.0021726617,0.0026614163,0.009765391,0.0010168401],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009573416,0.000009870133,0.0002670331,0.000015039609,0.0000028258266,0.00014853886,0.0025173088,0.000056808123,0.00021641978,0.9794881,0.014611408,0.0026570905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040475996,0.000057686044,0.0052362,0.00021213062,0.000024668283,0.00033083814,0.0014751418,0.00019604756,0.0013303863,0.21088505,0.78012544,0.00008595089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13716955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18698147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13716955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00969038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025216063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27274227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404586027","doi":"10.21991/cf29479","title":"Notwithstanding the Notwithstanding Clause","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Compromise; Constitution; Political science; Law; Charter; Federalism; Politics; Human rights; Democracy; Law and economics; Constitutional law; Independence (probability theory); Sociology","score_opus":0.035735627502750104,"score_gpt":0.30974509407732737,"score_spread":0.27400946657457725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404586027","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029079137,0.0012505274,0.022725148,0.019412044,0.0011810058,0.00012820968,0.00045956843,0.00018930931,0.9255751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84341246,0.0012454733,0.0109414235,0.022419523,0.0007176358,0.00019927057,0.0005811774,0.00015580335,0.12032725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958884,0.00043203012,0.0001308455,0.0006819236,0.0015688229,0.0012979549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99711347,0.00093022804,0.00021498819,0.0005359907,0.0010470238,0.0001582814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038414889,0.00031348405,0.00044987473,0.0007334733,0.0055186846,0.0042506214,0.0015338806,0.002799975,0.008754892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009059304,0.0003024326,0.00044300474,0.00060930697,0.010596278,0.0029463377,0.0016391386,0.005590471,0.0010503744],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031290786,0.0000017879627,0.000099781966,0.0000052803434,8.3353854e-7,0.000014523445,0.00024688878,0.000044266282,0.000083774314,0.9942473,0.0030415128,0.0022108217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027387292,0.0000346796,0.0027291866,0.00016474836,0.000038371592,0.00017268247,0.00070259627,0.00066524727,0.0012733294,0.39875537,0.59537977,0.000056609897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30885372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.313866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30885372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006872397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01932787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61411196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404586346","doi":"10.21991/cf29480","title":"Not Merely Interpretative","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.02562652841561336,"score_gpt":0.32874291388411897,"score_spread":0.3031163854685056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404586346","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019754386,0.004651638,0.11028211,0.09201068,0.0040100412,0.00017925285,0.00045141455,0.00035450555,0.7683059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.802809,0.00370499,0.029127585,0.04594399,0.0049893856,0.0005023502,0.00063096505,0.00073352683,0.111558355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98088545,0.007933098,0.0010744695,0.0027394923,0.005954723,0.0014127583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977241,0.010716256,0.0017528617,0.006266933,0.0035586406,0.00046435982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016982945,0.00077954656,0.0006351123,0.0020769048,0.004106845,0.011038665,0.0032993224,0.0051969257,0.008665485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030098708,0.000573048,0.00071909017,0.0013276569,0.035642795,0.017050415,0.00631128,0.011144539,0.0025278316],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007777015,0.000005140039,0.0001279369,0.000046739413,0.000005251043,0.000055488126,0.0037290307,0.00006446122,0.00020404464,0.9889604,0.0036703844,0.003123268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021941429,0.000029336585,0.0004808548,0.0004690117,0.000039806917,0.00021688256,0.0051634163,0.00040482267,0.0014076687,0.65031594,0.34141582,0.00003452036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004179957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004341098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016982945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004576605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006123237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08981544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407932841","doi":"10.21991/cf29485","title":"What is Most Bothersome About Section 33: Or What Hasn’t Yet Been Said","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); History; Political science; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.021247723575024358,"score_gpt":0.3104137479691132,"score_spread":0.28916602439408884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407932841","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047316193,0.009910161,0.002080776,0.9593614,0.007905048,0.000009814774,0.00007312962,0.000032564538,0.015895417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26618826,0.020992903,0.004551682,0.6676212,0.016631965,0.00005257923,0.00014609424,0.00024403789,0.023571337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.990858,0.0032369029,0.00024201597,0.0011975531,0.0029350785,0.0015305014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877215,0.0063908,0.00097179954,0.00058970845,0.0031785895,0.0011477026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011479224,0.00042117204,0.0007428766,0.0008237463,0.008138135,0.010846586,0.0029418012,0.009203319,0.005319949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03916756,0.00023695879,0.00045218223,0.0010578859,0.02308671,0.019387271,0.002240961,0.013791427,0.0013005765],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048868926,0.000035917932,0.0016032738,0.0005375437,0.000031927244,0.00050292595,0.016343711,0.00020166732,0.0005626531,0.6471441,0.28289306,0.050094355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010633639,0.000024407307,0.001981233,0.0018067053,0.000022668724,0.00041132735,0.03537509,0.00024947073,0.0007039378,0.28519204,0.6740798,0.00014263585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.073068984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10284087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.073068984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069501903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017282406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14528733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407932888","doi":"10.21991/cf29483","title":"Negating Positive Rights: A Note on Mathur v Ontario","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Political science; Socioeconomics; Sociology","score_opus":0.01889805905399201,"score_gpt":0.3111670329715735,"score_spread":0.2922689739175815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407932888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032665174,0.0051225876,0.0019971076,0.34066823,0.0023944161,0.00019302801,0.0005478119,0.00005497889,0.6163567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4850955,0.005549156,0.003432079,0.2894419,0.0019178714,0.00027439787,0.00021268548,0.00010706959,0.2139694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98479337,0.0014871628,0.00056729437,0.0014374973,0.008749816,0.0029648922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99426985,0.0027416206,0.00029203985,0.00026411924,0.0017922533,0.0006401211],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006924826,0.0005328128,0.0006357009,0.0011527707,0.020712234,0.009514177,0.003800401,0.015481016,0.0045202943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014990298,0.00091283204,0.0009452781,0.0011537793,0.015617955,0.004378186,0.003751507,0.011950328,0.00071144657],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055818855,0.000022146893,0.0024489493,0.000117509866,0.000029395711,0.0012278433,0.010174905,0.00017296718,0.00094578153,0.8227072,0.15198618,0.010111328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010023688,0.000051185056,0.006101145,0.00050547696,0.0001373941,0.00039045312,0.0076422663,0.00039638104,0.0015764898,0.0696029,0.9132664,0.00022966585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9475461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9829474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9475461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06722401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09355193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4877466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407933020","doi":"10.21991/cf29486","title":"Bill C53: An Ill-Advised Adventure of State Interference in the Constitutional Evolution of the State-Aboriginal Relationship","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Adventure; Law; Political science; History; Computer science; Art history","score_opus":0.012825318725294698,"score_gpt":0.2709262440852484,"score_spread":0.2581009253599537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407933020","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014278131,0.0018587062,0.005132958,0.7938369,0.008610502,0.0000943002,0.00011508638,0.00013466811,0.1759387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22788523,0.0013100619,0.007426322,0.67435676,0.0033884635,0.00020532744,0.00006836181,0.00015389801,0.08520562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9824964,0.0041058254,0.0005833935,0.0015530743,0.0071158726,0.00414543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9847691,0.00888709,0.0006176715,0.001153794,0.0032516627,0.001320587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020602405,0.00043114668,0.00064483413,0.0009318729,0.01783166,0.0135048255,0.0033893147,0.02999118,0.0039630304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038922783,0.00062071445,0.0010384762,0.001099253,0.029815339,0.004939869,0.0038369517,0.02537505,0.0009293806],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019990555,0.000010741817,0.00040792578,0.00002151241,0.0000059753534,0.00017644474,0.004192301,0.00014065817,0.0002314426,0.8654419,0.1245733,0.004777869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054163884,0.000042598258,0.0020860743,0.00034125912,0.00004732465,0.00018304386,0.0057063447,0.00053276954,0.00064680347,0.13149032,0.8587436,0.0001256729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5302777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.596697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46972227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026677432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053942595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9449771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407934253","doi":"10.21991/cf29484","title":"Ontario’s Ag-Gag Law, Where do Things Stand?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Art","score_opus":0.01628257739348415,"score_gpt":0.28987895374662537,"score_spread":0.2735963763531412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407934253","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02375599,0.010769649,0.0021997443,0.22165519,0.0015404435,0.0000905882,0.0013108118,0.00010609291,0.7385715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5239965,0.0069179498,0.004050438,0.036444593,0.00036363487,0.00007102955,0.00051253993,0.000087053704,0.42755637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971685,0.00028987788,0.000058008485,0.00026726892,0.001316809,0.0008995199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99840504,0.00036236778,0.00009211878,0.0000818852,0.000706782,0.0003518842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018148082,0.00028380082,0.00019092164,0.0009619138,0.015726876,0.007982797,0.0012172955,0.0034912392,0.012407916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038609232,0.00031705323,0.00030957843,0.001502091,0.010374191,0.0022419046,0.001348562,0.0025405746,0.0009788456],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002171719,0.000010032827,0.0025712347,0.000113418544,0.000009587837,0.00034107777,0.010970422,0.00014016317,0.00047457032,0.75892246,0.2113437,0.015081664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008096428,0.0000048576226,0.005340953,0.00013776816,0.000008844174,0.000044139553,0.006541302,0.00009384746,0.00020312174,0.021888249,0.9657015,0.000027321068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9843054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99480045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09620176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09620176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1226948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6979959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410002467","doi":"10.21991/cf29491","title":"“We do not really know why this approach was taken”: Explaining and Modifying the Supreme Court’s Approach to the Indirect Horizontal Effect of Charter Rights","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02154921779442441,"score_gpt":0.27536276577393937,"score_spread":0.25381354797951494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410002467","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022479886,0.0014112545,0.012619479,0.83212316,0.004062582,0.00007831234,0.00010702119,0.00012485644,0.12699337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63637763,0.0010613942,0.009170171,0.30951446,0.0021632256,0.00024327284,0.000044475142,0.00017581471,0.041249484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98984724,0.0045668427,0.0003645768,0.0011511142,0.002326236,0.0017438995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99108934,0.006209265,0.00042326975,0.0004488945,0.0014306862,0.00039855056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008590423,0.00045898597,0.00038376616,0.0010286395,0.011153156,0.01395085,0.0033579331,0.019619284,0.0037619148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029042337,0.00052573765,0.000897362,0.0008545854,0.024553668,0.009101485,0.003888277,0.02646311,0.00063534017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009083593,0.000009793039,0.000335143,0.000028933277,0.0000064075407,0.00027190996,0.01095457,0.00017234204,0.00029930184,0.92842215,0.056309443,0.0031810147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003690056,0.00004891562,0.0018095605,0.0005041269,0.00004668776,0.0003094716,0.022644626,0.0018741556,0.0028523004,0.3798431,0.5898382,0.00019206751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060975548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07554787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060975548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01023886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008795772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12124127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410002500","doi":"10.21991/cf29489","title":"A Kick in the Caboose: Recovering the Judicial Horizontality of Constitutional Equality Rights","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02899769913866132,"score_gpt":0.3149318039569513,"score_spread":0.28593410481828996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410002500","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2197611,0.0046296176,0.14638358,0.1292378,0.0014115854,0.00017642857,0.00018758797,0.00020457155,0.49800768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96761996,0.0008704468,0.012680028,0.004599704,0.00025225856,0.000063525265,0.00005077191,0.00007046951,0.013792889],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99391514,0.0022552458,0.00013915038,0.0008471157,0.0016295579,0.0012138677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842704,0.009243146,0.00087695004,0.0036762764,0.0013830587,0.0005501915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010263583,0.00029832456,0.000839238,0.0019103831,0.008538556,0.008716533,0.0016745947,0.004723899,0.010201637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03179823,0.0005593221,0.0005095182,0.0019762998,0.03729272,0.01427476,0.007593678,0.011542699,0.000566651],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068385148,0.00000629294,0.00023330069,0.000010050586,0.0000021623753,0.000036607584,0.0013785517,0.00011482668,0.00009092317,0.99188274,0.0012371554,0.005000563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028736322,0.000023823248,0.0009955422,0.00018523783,0.000011595253,0.000062727595,0.0050099026,0.0013040912,0.0007869677,0.9487399,0.042822246,0.000029106435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03311293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047283683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03311293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006064373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01295528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06584042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410002519","doi":"10.21991/cf29492","title":"Editors' Introduction: Beyond Dolphin Delivery","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Travel Writing and Literature","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Alberta; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Fishery; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.008674139978887597,"score_gpt":0.2144849643956954,"score_spread":0.20581082441680779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410002519","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009150838,0.0019752423,0.00026124384,0.032663114,0.93870735,0.00004055567,0.00018137989,0.00016476019,0.025914904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0023194791,0.0036254674,0.00045112372,0.03198071,0.82508415,0.000104766936,0.00023364509,0.00034798775,0.1358527],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99485296,0.0006351141,0.00040987477,0.0007072852,0.0028808152,0.0005140001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98147076,0.004826733,0.001005697,0.0009464901,0.008986358,0.00276397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048902417,0.0019221772,0.0014346335,0.0030858344,0.004525374,0.011280631,0.0020116456,0.005526211,0.11704328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03014299,0.00059236126,0.0011319736,0.0015751078,0.001809819,0.0052135233,0.0033254626,0.008118663,0.05771538],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000779982,0.0000050233034,0.0000135175305,0.000048586156,8.6601216e-7,0.000019723979,0.000026804919,0.000010477424,0.00003389125,0.00089793676,0.9922511,0.0066842176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003692269,0.000008847728,0.000070643204,0.00010844076,0.0000014903128,0.000019938796,0.00004613332,0.000025366588,0.000026995667,0.0005818272,0.9991025,0.0000042235615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017704077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031556408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11704328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031613745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035836673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3915488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410002556","doi":"10.21991/cf29490","title":"Charter Horizontality, the Public/Private Divide, and Responding to Injustice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Charter; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Law","score_opus":0.026127192820648328,"score_gpt":0.3095340130693342,"score_spread":0.28340682024868585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410002556","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2661297,0.0019600093,0.05061641,0.14293718,0.0007330012,0.00010805815,0.000025413849,0.00011388024,0.53737646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98864436,0.00023933964,0.0012928026,0.0032748159,0.00009929008,0.00003091482,0.0000045261936,0.000019885894,0.0063940724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99191284,0.004882905,0.00013903584,0.00049898366,0.0012092039,0.0013569694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936134,0.0033200243,0.0011043347,0.00066098897,0.000451797,0.00084951334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009423755,0.00025264086,0.00027561816,0.0010969186,0.0072483798,0.010208384,0.0008281123,0.0035076763,0.0038811902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013496803,0.00019286344,0.00028942537,0.0007694213,0.049475282,0.00716789,0.008513895,0.0069006416,0.0002826839],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000091308175,0.000025058593,0.00058178074,0.000012030585,0.0000021923158,0.00003904018,0.0078092804,0.00018289837,0.00015130464,0.9852797,0.0011184833,0.004789228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025323845,0.00007846791,0.00226908,0.00014634215,0.000010136056,0.00007727643,0.02749478,0.00075815053,0.0007711303,0.90724874,0.06109365,0.000026835638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004343883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068699373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010208384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046626767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005320226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049838126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410002592","doi":"10.21991/cf29488","title":"Towards a Less Woolly Conception of Horizontal Effect","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Architecture and Computational Design","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.0066317549830013445,"score_gpt":0.22431761289032257,"score_spread":0.21768585790732123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410002592","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017287081,0.004825483,0.33761165,0.05016289,0.0016117558,0.00006792453,0.00017866297,0.00021482618,0.58803976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85099953,0.0034699785,0.072468825,0.013373348,0.0023367694,0.00041530977,0.00015206482,0.00039624827,0.056387883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953259,0.0022459389,0.000118108845,0.00088848476,0.0009933173,0.000428267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99542975,0.0024987406,0.00030636834,0.0010373098,0.00046612349,0.00026165418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068327636,0.00074977824,0.0007825404,0.0021524369,0.003521477,0.007654996,0.0026627406,0.0045617702,0.010519185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068484168,0.00038298153,0.0009725115,0.0016134982,0.037789144,0.015572642,0.0052364366,0.011318144,0.0014274714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011665738,0.0000016797957,0.000021256481,0.0000036188314,5.191907e-7,0.0000024103763,0.0001520378,0.000039802915,0.00000916399,0.99917114,0.00021899497,0.00037822954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006755073,0.000010733661,0.000095775344,0.000031200903,0.0000027484264,0.00002320382,0.00029279763,0.00045970213,0.00008035964,0.969218,0.029773328,0.000005354027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031830117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023841157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010519185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004413982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024893864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036135554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410002594","doi":"10.21991/cf29487","title":"The Hidden Promise of Dolphin Delivery: Shields, Swords and Horizontal Application of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Shields; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Engineering; Sociology; Electrical engineering","score_opus":0.0077785180062920145,"score_gpt":0.25335356214879684,"score_spread":0.24557504414250483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410002594","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15585169,0.0029552432,0.016377859,0.07884771,0.00029691873,0.00008994049,0.00015458376,0.00008021873,0.74534583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9616066,0.0009143397,0.001997969,0.00555526,0.00006340357,0.000020250158,0.000020035894,0.00002901692,0.029793115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949126,0.00088206795,0.00006964565,0.0005213098,0.0019237163,0.0016906366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969717,0.001263881,0.00017687447,0.00025613492,0.0009093129,0.00042213645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039712097,0.0003167662,0.00031030978,0.00070013537,0.011527237,0.009921901,0.0013996157,0.003146609,0.0050093094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066980645,0.0004228455,0.00037373646,0.0008067157,0.03665384,0.0037690252,0.0050039627,0.005507623,0.000280673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009268008,0.0000051928705,0.00061752525,0.000015281705,0.000002880675,0.0001578123,0.006293687,0.00027744824,0.00020551341,0.9839019,0.0036629443,0.0048507345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058529346,0.00008325769,0.011189026,0.0006516292,0.000085653526,0.00032426792,0.039854158,0.0035349608,0.0024692998,0.45818484,0.4833397,0.00022466632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88696563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9319093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11303437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053107187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07660511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38532144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414957213","doi":"10.21991/cf29498","title":"Deconstructing City of Toronto: Unwritten Constitutional Principles and Responsive Judicial Review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Judicial review; Supreme court; Democracy; Constitutional law; Judicial activism; Key (lock); Judicial opinion","score_opus":0.024817443499189795,"score_gpt":0.31920598021649615,"score_spread":0.29438853671730636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414957213","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058106527,0.015945459,0.053803504,0.181595,0.001036467,0.0003493364,0.00023196792,0.00022899729,0.6887028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9396585,0.0025267794,0.009480394,0.010560526,0.00026672077,0.00013746705,0.000044783403,0.000060851435,0.037263904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9746961,0.008928265,0.0008002528,0.0026683372,0.008592704,0.004314414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877693,0.0067200144,0.0007690469,0.0010986166,0.0025836716,0.0010594017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014776603,0.0004296381,0.00044947414,0.0024273333,0.017304538,0.016884968,0.0027390486,0.0062714326,0.0023811802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024165789,0.0006241421,0.0004256086,0.0021809682,0.03684151,0.0048493175,0.005285632,0.006827543,0.00027359123],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028506267,0.0000012799286,0.00016066905,0.000014607538,0.0000030882384,0.00005501294,0.0033525485,0.00022928399,0.000068575864,0.99044,0.0026763931,0.002995735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004461972,0.00002674653,0.003605957,0.0003243197,0.000056859037,0.0001725191,0.009669428,0.002703627,0.0010309906,0.5906375,0.39158705,0.00014036048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83221316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91380924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16778684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09814317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1407545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71208185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414957217","doi":"10.21991/cf29493","title":"Editors’ Introduction: Responsive Judicial Review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Constitutional review; Legislation; Constitution; Judicial opinion; Public policy","score_opus":0.016730526873929313,"score_gpt":0.3061496900456219,"score_spread":0.2894191631716926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414957217","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005594454,0.012725367,0.0007874588,0.08165827,0.89646554,0.000033340064,0.00007835906,0.00008303903,0.008112693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016058745,0.008487476,0.00066310813,0.065663695,0.9035545,0.00006647648,0.00008590341,0.00011916048,0.019753708],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98114955,0.0055993367,0.0018785162,0.0024221567,0.007856107,0.0010942669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9474351,0.025594302,0.0030656753,0.002209229,0.017160952,0.004534751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013166621,0.0020014474,0.0017303894,0.0044795,0.0034935675,0.01123969,0.003352668,0.010367458,0.023566145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056241956,0.00082861475,0.0016711679,0.002698887,0.0034692744,0.0060384227,0.0031417278,0.016972067,0.014768267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010561313,0.000008672714,0.000018798939,0.00016927971,0.000004973657,0.000030196301,0.00003514262,0.000032144162,0.000036502977,0.0038389724,0.98627263,0.009541994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009670305,0.000018380282,0.00012929067,0.00033758782,0.000006069717,0.00005466592,0.000046371406,0.000067534434,0.000038333965,0.0041964375,0.9950826,0.000013014878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012314791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020536117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023566145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00433451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005424283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07883662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414957218","doi":"10.21991/cf29496","title":"The Regime Politics of Responsive Judicial Review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Judicial independence; Charter; Judicial activism; Supreme court; Politics; Skepticism; Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.018028879206513602,"score_gpt":0.31882299909524886,"score_spread":0.3007941198887353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414957218","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01601453,0.06683135,0.028174942,0.29962337,0.0043026214,0.00016264169,0.00011641027,0.00018723944,0.5845868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8088196,0.027969478,0.0056798304,0.11051513,0.008608163,0.0003591431,0.000077455035,0.00014977908,0.037821446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9095676,0.041654352,0.0021633087,0.007568966,0.030808926,0.008236998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94057983,0.039639186,0.0036694105,0.0034619255,0.011038425,0.0016111844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0394606,0.00031795105,0.00085927756,0.003125869,0.006242312,0.014801148,0.0027396858,0.009020795,0.0024856913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.072460465,0.00062427216,0.000781981,0.0025787225,0.020760056,0.005871063,0.0028892749,0.011667293,0.0009661277],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005832229,0.000006265823,0.00018133639,0.00006401216,0.000015682503,0.000029999836,0.0005986181,0.00026354662,0.00015587691,0.98045576,0.009528634,0.008694357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038655686,0.000036653517,0.0018052723,0.00074657844,0.000047957074,0.00011147238,0.0009626842,0.0011582007,0.00074254954,0.61574,0.37853345,0.00007653016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029015472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027956221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0394606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030133994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025073742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21863842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414957225","doi":"10.21991/cf29499","title":"Responsive Judicial Review in Canada: Reflections on the Notwithstanding Clause and Beyond","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Scope (computer science); Constitutional review; Judicial opinion; Judicial activism; Constitutional law; Constitution","score_opus":0.03875688112898575,"score_gpt":0.32320262861898413,"score_spread":0.2844457474899984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414957225","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006213267,0.019046267,0.0018965458,0.8539379,0.0032125781,0.00009350932,0.00012023953,0.00006711967,0.115412585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43816963,0.023544256,0.0034838126,0.47190905,0.0038489446,0.0002157992,0.00013579932,0.00016324072,0.058529403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8972781,0.021762261,0.0022883988,0.0061232643,0.0445902,0.0279578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8712818,0.066201635,0.0037050503,0.0026681959,0.043223243,0.0129200015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05628491,0.00083121646,0.002024998,0.0043376903,0.05843373,0.030790705,0.008266792,0.0285986,0.008998806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12844716,0.0011380607,0.0016225352,0.0068793194,0.043793462,0.009357627,0.008694382,0.032752793,0.0007628883],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004307324,0.000029304903,0.0006915786,0.00018861998,0.000032934782,0.0003793924,0.009751491,0.00063541,0.0001701623,0.84102255,0.12906387,0.017991604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013400841,0.00004900513,0.0051380624,0.0010345763,0.000096751384,0.00018480344,0.01628042,0.0012386899,0.00046208332,0.15739551,0.81760687,0.0003792857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99075365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9927475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.27698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.52546036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8386007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414957226","doi":"10.21991/cf29497","title":"The Role of Democratic Majority Understandings of Rights in Rosalind Dixon’s Responsive Judicial Review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Democracy; Judicial activism; Subject (documents); Judicial independence","score_opus":0.010602688835130982,"score_gpt":0.2920016914288353,"score_spread":0.2813990025937043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414957226","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023807526,0.00557917,0.08676546,0.33226654,0.0024315207,0.00027125783,0.000060898325,0.00016023027,0.5486574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8593074,0.0013585833,0.01928852,0.06985651,0.0017535842,0.00038581673,0.000023214652,0.00008453123,0.047941808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.92977226,0.03989129,0.0020647862,0.008112486,0.014559131,0.0055999965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96250796,0.027864132,0.0015718023,0.0027465895,0.00406938,0.001240198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048925783,0.0005934188,0.0008395767,0.0020917263,0.016001405,0.020827223,0.0032340274,0.013535937,0.0028542099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06283846,0.0008177797,0.0010909131,0.0012587791,0.043819778,0.013481645,0.008984495,0.017857475,0.000591012],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039860643,0.0000048772094,0.00006933669,0.0000075910752,0.000004458241,0.00003805875,0.0015580489,0.00013030195,0.000042276435,0.99336433,0.0026353654,0.0021414207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034397755,0.00001691673,0.00024640156,0.000080633195,0.000016278376,0.00006851479,0.0009633455,0.0007615804,0.00039741735,0.9137672,0.08360188,0.00004550153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021067569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024991283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048925783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014335062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016348692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2587474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414957232","doi":"10.21991/cf29494","title":"Living Dead Constitutionalism or Why Old Constitutional Worlds Are Never Lost for Good: A Comment on Rosalind Dixon’s Responsive Judicial Review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Charter; Constitutional theory; Normative; Section (typography); Articulation (sociology); Judicial review; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.03886540404702162,"score_gpt":0.327677094621816,"score_spread":0.2888116905747944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414957232","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020716386,0.007922405,0.00081268983,0.9466049,0.0027044592,0.000014926327,0.00003443185,0.000028514101,0.03980597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1580913,0.006761364,0.0010900975,0.804377,0.0042569134,0.000064466054,0.000030123741,0.000111927875,0.025216853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95468783,0.014207675,0.0010875164,0.005648955,0.01936287,0.005005107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9374571,0.04535397,0.0013099117,0.0015028218,0.012463305,0.00191291],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03653258,0.00063408556,0.0012748531,0.002066521,0.028671445,0.019478252,0.0068056495,0.029274076,0.0034558186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0771703,0.00074034155,0.0010514174,0.003763082,0.054008804,0.012019077,0.004964506,0.039624177,0.0007495961],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012002517,0.0000059505796,0.00009839853,0.000051928888,0.0000059161985,0.00012331753,0.005873236,0.0001007857,0.000053199394,0.8511958,0.1391873,0.003292057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003489964,0.00001587309,0.0005620273,0.0004282995,0.000021737304,0.00013922683,0.00859795,0.0003249783,0.00031074107,0.12157336,0.86786854,0.00012244731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6836506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7059518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6836506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06888085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.092822015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63642484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414957244","doi":"10.21991/cf29495","title":"Out of the Shadows: Responsive Judicial Review and the Resurgence of the Notwithstanding Clause","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Legitimacy; Judicial activism; Charter; Judicial independence; Democratic legitimacy; Order (exchange); Judicial opinion","score_opus":0.017971527778015053,"score_gpt":0.301501207142136,"score_spread":0.283529679364121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414957244","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10356767,0.012797868,0.029316535,0.48230037,0.0022525035,0.0001790948,0.00006157876,0.00019667354,0.36932763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91647893,0.0016508682,0.0030772528,0.05422053,0.0008764451,0.00005830634,0.000014192228,0.000059780927,0.023563737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96185637,0.017522108,0.0006822588,0.0031094702,0.012261988,0.0045678127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95505834,0.033322833,0.0024789185,0.0019357587,0.0055311467,0.0016730436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035510954,0.00024584532,0.0004606085,0.0017549628,0.011760684,0.013154774,0.0024178007,0.01041163,0.003535243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0711201,0.0003539287,0.00047602307,0.001229906,0.02588726,0.0072705555,0.005337008,0.010860341,0.0004489686],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002206464,0.000016454382,0.00052629324,0.000033434604,0.000012143941,0.00039864858,0.008945935,0.0003158015,0.0005947102,0.9509967,0.017090624,0.021047212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012697268,0.00008553247,0.0034949072,0.00035797607,0.00007570288,0.00054447836,0.0124988975,0.002629855,0.003106206,0.5757745,0.40112707,0.00017796144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09277297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.111581005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09277297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022434328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032529235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18780214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416019410","doi":"10.21991/cf29507","title":"Notwithstanding the Backbench: Section 33 in Non-Government Bills","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Invocation; Vocabulary; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.014658170540866971,"score_gpt":0.27418131762501635,"score_spread":0.25952314708414936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416019410","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13778178,0.0073910924,0.02196259,0.09305307,0.0025434953,0.0001290365,0.00039834,0.00021711552,0.73652345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9307012,0.0013413046,0.0029799892,0.013850494,0.0007509642,0.00011389102,0.00017028252,0.00014736064,0.049944494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918901,0.003519798,0.00033136073,0.0008285697,0.0021187165,0.0013115522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924925,0.0053144204,0.00065868796,0.0008005663,0.00058238074,0.00015147835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009989524,0.00020526079,0.00033106204,0.001231118,0.005345162,0.0060443985,0.0009947157,0.0049501555,0.004447535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017962297,0.00036364226,0.00052714994,0.0019228305,0.011022705,0.006053223,0.0026851902,0.009336235,0.0005802725],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000088886545,0.0000048330553,0.00026308137,0.0000119141105,0.0000010815543,0.000041757725,0.0015437693,0.000050436676,0.000086414344,0.9886614,0.004986695,0.004339691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022794813,0.000079935446,0.008420841,0.0006391583,0.000028928704,0.000263039,0.0037666797,0.0011117435,0.0013982725,0.34570363,0.6384703,0.00009468736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02133867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025781866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99408746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059125596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005110145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05283034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416019415","doi":"10.21991/cf29504","title":"Is the Notwithstanding Clause an Ouster Clause?","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Charter; Jurisprudence; Jurisdiction; High Court; Judicial review; Original jurisdiction; Political question","score_opus":0.057133175380252456,"score_gpt":0.35987310849531035,"score_spread":0.30273993311505787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416019415","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12155493,0.014310587,0.016270997,0.13058291,0.0025578397,0.00016941401,0.0004711243,0.00011712827,0.7139651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8806848,0.003197294,0.002318133,0.0479134,0.0009360915,0.000070121416,0.00018989817,0.00005580973,0.06463453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99624276,0.00060316955,0.000116423915,0.00063692237,0.0010923897,0.0013084144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99698406,0.0015832315,0.0002610804,0.0002914713,0.00070108427,0.00017897051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004360587,0.00026217083,0.0005478499,0.0007578023,0.0063645686,0.009147619,0.0019066128,0.0063812872,0.009020292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008854299,0.00035636828,0.0003862421,0.0010881299,0.01744599,0.0059754,0.0017228149,0.0049337507,0.0008564199],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009767839,0.0000066182447,0.0005908549,0.000017303897,0.000002760998,0.00014840264,0.0015162613,0.000036630743,0.00015887409,0.9849377,0.007422889,0.0051519186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063222404,0.000049977945,0.0073559363,0.00061021565,0.000050387607,0.00045286826,0.010290415,0.0006504359,0.0019035537,0.28082547,0.6976254,0.00012215911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38796654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42617807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9853613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014638714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014655052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77141666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416019417","doi":"10.21991/cf29506","title":"Surveillance Capitalism and the Charter: Infusing the Common Law with Charter Values","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Premise; Capitalism; Common law; Context (archaeology); Tort; Common core; Value (mathematics); Private law","score_opus":0.007659276043983735,"score_gpt":0.2519219820825539,"score_spread":0.24426270603857017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416019417","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.093942344,0.004511456,0.12724891,0.18881893,0.0011702725,0.0001300371,0.00012211883,0.00014266031,0.5839133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97085863,0.0010160387,0.00837349,0.008093991,0.0004979661,0.00010159267,0.000033068576,0.000041473846,0.010983782],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866116,0.0071946993,0.00037190193,0.0013293083,0.003118567,0.0013739903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850535,0.0098385345,0.0014625071,0.0019798584,0.0012209325,0.00044464428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014608014,0.00030238298,0.0003887365,0.001189242,0.006011067,0.012027251,0.0014260386,0.00460484,0.0023119783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018945439,0.00038782627,0.00064880383,0.00118963,0.060624912,0.014411511,0.006042319,0.00953501,0.00020782682],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015792764,0.0000018949472,0.00006830918,0.0000025617298,6.064221e-7,0.000010780493,0.0008342532,0.000058827987,0.000014628578,0.997623,0.0004988309,0.00088466913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011361029,0.00002409685,0.0005022347,0.0001183922,0.000007636015,0.00004786357,0.0018195258,0.0007500243,0.000377477,0.92949903,0.06682027,0.000022119515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024091467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018972378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9883514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011648574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010344342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08451676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416019422","doi":"10.21991/cf29503","title":"The Constitutional Status of Overbreadth: A Reply to Professor Stewart","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Norm (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Supreme court; Constitutional law; Charter","score_opus":0.02341658620626918,"score_gpt":0.3074552228880814,"score_spread":0.28403863668181223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416019422","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002402557,0.004717789,0.00046906827,0.9777245,0.00253148,0.0000043888863,0.000021802085,0.0000103360635,0.012118065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15303506,0.0073738247,0.0013209637,0.80117995,0.019937115,0.00007929718,0.000054113734,0.00009509646,0.016924521],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867024,0.0058401576,0.0005594801,0.0029581313,0.0028708277,0.0010689357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9530015,0.040218208,0.0009390469,0.0014312406,0.0030138998,0.0013961353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025656572,0.00057806197,0.001527941,0.0011655765,0.009632533,0.00894535,0.004684423,0.03533083,0.006689308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048911717,0.0007097955,0.0010093965,0.0014147296,0.03620185,0.017180566,0.006440421,0.038286842,0.0013781218],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031718475,0.000023052145,0.00025003107,0.000054545777,0.000007938055,0.00018127458,0.0032303932,0.000100248806,0.000121019366,0.85299355,0.13690875,0.006097395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000963915,0.00005691798,0.0007909151,0.0004878145,0.000015353593,0.00023954337,0.00512753,0.00043576004,0.00030526335,0.43214083,0.56022733,0.000076380486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014863529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014826465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99183005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008169954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007962474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13568652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416019425","doi":"10.21991/cf29502","title":"What is Sovereignty?","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Assertion; Politics; Rule of law; Reading (process); De facto; Popular sovereignty","score_opus":0.027474278321987313,"score_gpt":0.32437231349692264,"score_spread":0.29689803517493535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416019425","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024070812,0.012812673,0.009289798,0.21402395,0.0012443821,0.00004337277,0.00013864216,0.000051170377,0.7383251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9180581,0.00550522,0.0025511472,0.019135453,0.0007404689,0.00006344542,0.00010898538,0.000058907688,0.05377819],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99514955,0.0016275406,0.00016411902,0.0006887462,0.0011580802,0.0012120303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974106,0.0012175636,0.00011790918,0.00027496397,0.0006392659,0.00033974703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005393395,0.00037218913,0.00060291326,0.001346892,0.015936933,0.01150026,0.0012953596,0.004085968,0.0060238214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064699445,0.0002862023,0.00047418708,0.0014706594,0.07579797,0.011725334,0.0043397667,0.007196656,0.00070052914],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011679512,0.0000010344909,0.000052713523,0.000008524619,0.0000011618877,0.000015264986,0.0045541464,0.000017089584,0.000016385578,0.99204564,0.0020704526,0.0012163097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051689667,0.0000053822714,0.0006768209,0.00014649247,0.0000055769633,0.000050234765,0.008964818,0.00009436911,0.0000704809,0.80043006,0.18953668,0.000014042831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4582115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35281202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4582115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02255235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026189115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9110888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416019431","doi":"10.21991/cf29505","title":"The Charter’s Forgotten Weapon: Reclaiming Section 28 For Trans Equality","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Identity (music); Legislature; Face (sociological concept); Constitutional law; Constitutional right","score_opus":0.04191491100674879,"score_gpt":0.3275828716107907,"score_spread":0.2856679606040419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416019431","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035766758,0.0025064328,0.03594994,0.47587407,0.008212291,0.00025197727,0.00027767476,0.0004936285,0.44066727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58398056,0.0011520266,0.020033237,0.2398354,0.0016274487,0.00034496834,0.00013804037,0.0004959771,0.15239228],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9760828,0.0064815674,0.00087668333,0.0030489932,0.009701377,0.0038085894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855223,0.0063819336,0.00075080857,0.0015254569,0.004206079,0.0016134486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022184916,0.0005128713,0.00062320416,0.0009883153,0.010520882,0.013834116,0.0028295775,0.011587227,0.0039698593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034810115,0.0005631963,0.0007441176,0.00069327967,0.031939078,0.0058815707,0.0052311956,0.023321472,0.0010283235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013843953,0.000010611926,0.00020122011,0.000012682777,0.0000027302976,0.00006769165,0.0039445576,0.00014098239,0.00034515254,0.9504405,0.03948525,0.0053347475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000585263,0.000058003654,0.0011087138,0.00025532686,0.00002541029,0.00015377348,0.0044209925,0.00092851656,0.0015244787,0.18023714,0.81110495,0.00012402657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42309043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.486419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9760935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023906503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07625099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84125555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416019433","doi":"10.21991/cf29500","title":"Editorial Introduction","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.021920956872984437,"score_gpt":0.3137978572957482,"score_spread":0.29187690042276376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416019433","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000043378364,0.0012372086,0.00011358495,0.029254653,0.96240413,0.00003424463,0.00016521517,0.00008436837,0.006663282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010584615,0.0024782547,0.00024792188,0.028453367,0.90887076,0.00008039172,0.00029765186,0.00017497233,0.058338255],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954774,0.000555967,0.00039606015,0.00069532235,0.0023699403,0.0005053532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98141015,0.0036041704,0.0011379078,0.0008226827,0.010212269,0.0028128622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043931333,0.0018591187,0.001615259,0.0034877239,0.0033929066,0.007151512,0.0024105809,0.007884629,0.114728875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024264494,0.0006686654,0.0016358801,0.0011425469,0.0013223,0.0032975806,0.0027803895,0.009348888,0.052037664],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008656962,0.0000049227287,0.000016904954,0.00006931989,0.0000017219553,0.000025178557,0.000010642925,0.000009306982,0.00003197282,0.0002411129,0.9952238,0.004356512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010465649,0.000010600282,0.00012692944,0.00017390313,0.000004266606,0.000046230634,0.000030765917,0.000025778209,0.000049260805,0.00045430567,0.9990601,0.000007406226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014215059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028453711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.114728875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023105303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003974706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3838063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W45237071","doi":"10.21991/c9vq1b","title":"NAFTA AND FEDERALISM IN THE UNITED STATES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; New Federalism; International trade; Business; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.04505384410287,"score_gpt":0.282225762482526,"score_spread":0.237171918379656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W45237071","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09446414,0.08440378,0.0011063563,0.27381742,0.0038602925,0.000022215814,0.0006879395,0.00004610675,0.54159176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9247396,0.018931966,0.00072858436,0.024315672,0.0023239222,0.000060000366,0.00023038186,0.000026044423,0.02864383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99630946,0.0016535717,0.00018234143,0.00037730456,0.00054155407,0.00093575986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966698,0.0018517424,0.00047889716,0.00014700156,0.00048676768,0.00036570945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004437878,0.00019771575,0.00065216824,0.0026328457,0.0074045844,0.011970953,0.0006190113,0.0072273933,0.0062826164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074631684,0.00044355806,0.0008987893,0.004188186,0.0063856663,0.00410759,0.0025674566,0.0057166843,0.00030852598],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035548328,0.000044559965,0.002463419,0.000025970188,0.000029177967,0.0000778647,0.0011912873,0.0003064623,0.00006898588,0.96694005,0.02201505,0.006801514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009132386,0.00006855383,0.030521404,0.00091577,0.00013073308,0.00013482176,0.004716184,0.0008933951,0.00025203402,0.43584424,0.52631885,0.000112643516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15981323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26295635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15981323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013507118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01436727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.317766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W46369315","doi":"10.21991/c9967g","title":"THE CHRISTIAN RIGHT, THE FEDERAL COURTS, AND THE CONSTITUTION IN THE UNITED STATES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Protestantism; Abortion; White (mutation); Christian right; Civil rights; Boy Scouts; Constitutional right; Politics","score_opus":0.022264657064799985,"score_gpt":0.2659809177190766,"score_spread":0.24371626065427662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W46369315","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.103143975,0.06580514,0.0011063941,0.23891918,0.0023887586,0.000024287696,0.000108766064,0.00003300088,0.5884705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9243484,0.008982476,0.00063624803,0.025826393,0.0011815431,0.000052353433,0.000051570878,0.00001535473,0.038905606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754494,0.0012314575,0.000057389763,0.00025639514,0.0003005865,0.0006091159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983652,0.0009971162,0.0001640658,0.00009378959,0.00010714612,0.0002725834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002983792,0.00020407622,0.00023779189,0.0014698908,0.013771849,0.010855339,0.00054516597,0.007678286,0.0051334393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035642022,0.00032861685,0.00025853733,0.0015544166,0.019725047,0.0051523345,0.0037815198,0.0068911454,0.00030260102],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073853535,0.00001749505,0.0003293781,0.000009106901,0.0000018069406,0.00008096652,0.0019942482,0.000074914366,0.000035520392,0.9845206,0.008473195,0.0044553597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044276978,0.000031144074,0.004563152,0.0005071194,0.0000171621,0.00014490062,0.0071077324,0.00038604616,0.0002197111,0.57289505,0.41402638,0.00005732097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07718697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15413487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07718697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009257192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008950525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1534754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W49700271","doi":"10.21991/c9n08w","title":"CANADA AND QUEBEC PLAYING CONSTITUTIONAL CHICKEN: THE VIEW FROM AN AUSTRALIAN PEDESTRIAN","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Sport and Mega-Event Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pedestrian; Political science; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.051733363307554785,"score_gpt":0.2851554098296786,"score_spread":0.23342204652212378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W49700271","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36372063,0.0073770112,0.0006733684,0.42688075,0.001450806,0.00006855132,0.00029796967,0.000028140008,0.19950284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.803465,0.003292615,0.0004290955,0.086029865,0.00025063122,0.000049608538,0.000057103764,0.000043799926,0.10638228],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969543,0.0004943682,0.000038487797,0.00027335944,0.0005264061,0.0017130576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99650145,0.00046856448,0.00015826695,0.00007269619,0.0010678207,0.001731288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019513534,0.00051423383,0.0006293878,0.0011069161,0.06500525,0.013217242,0.0027449555,0.013616262,0.009764957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003258659,0.00059788505,0.0007900255,0.0027255358,0.019513482,0.00314152,0.0050333855,0.02010529,0.00040008154],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013936212,0.00014922598,0.020065142,0.00017750454,0.0000763857,0.0042255665,0.5480878,0.0007748571,0.0009898285,0.20339324,0.19432949,0.02759165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022859684,0.000048044647,0.024332816,0.0003680173,0.000060946597,0.00042433778,0.52615076,0.0002630352,0.0002050199,0.005601179,0.44235805,0.00016489798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9962257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99811125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08660348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08660348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10864838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62835515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W54976218","doi":"10.21991/c9xh41","title":"MEECH LAKE AND DEMOCRATIC POLITICS: SOME OBSERVATIONS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Democracy; Political science; Public administration; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.061372101877120666,"score_gpt":0.27173557835971446,"score_spread":0.2103634764825938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W54976218","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3387863,0.004203335,0.0042790603,0.17157488,0.00029214678,0.00005650727,0.000580264,0.00008812311,0.48013943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97380155,0.0015742368,0.0004954451,0.0046237856,0.00046274578,0.000046486955,0.00012100571,0.00006843385,0.018806364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980731,0.00073888473,0.000064026324,0.00020813968,0.00037478367,0.00054100895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98788667,0.009656512,0.0010580973,0.00051539304,0.00053822267,0.0003451155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025576307,0.00023359199,0.00037216712,0.0019103289,0.007533991,0.006089421,0.0008724262,0.003397594,0.02548545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011629535,0.000578766,0.00047741315,0.0043063033,0.010127414,0.016845293,0.0054808236,0.0060697272,0.00063696445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026496645,0.00015105758,0.0070546125,0.00017153917,0.00002045795,0.0006443461,0.04203418,0.0005093016,0.00041110767,0.89155114,0.039508987,0.01767831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015008118,0.00007600712,0.039854486,0.00027383317,0.000043517248,0.00047376414,0.06962514,0.0012707396,0.0014493921,0.63243186,0.25424528,0.00010588885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018228918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026262008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9817711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034795646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015050884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08525735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W58397629","doi":"10.21991/c9pm3h","title":"RIGHTS BROUGHT HOME: THE UNITED KINGDOM ADOPTS A \"CHARTER OF RIGHTS\"","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Kingdom; Law; Political science; Human rights; Public administration","score_opus":0.05191623041426489,"score_gpt":0.2862027304870549,"score_spread":0.23428650007279003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W58397629","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021198997,0.010582104,0.022685677,0.20789742,0.014767236,0.0006041436,0.0011270645,0.00047777608,0.7206596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4422925,0.004685853,0.040457558,0.17309244,0.0050953277,0.0012893718,0.00073312846,0.0006680273,0.3316858],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93704975,0.022453316,0.006666489,0.0069408068,0.016228585,0.010661043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9691733,0.010763524,0.002674312,0.0044882325,0.010897783,0.002002821],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025199138,0.0012207493,0.0018045659,0.0021221563,0.012266081,0.034523092,0.00470154,0.039626498,0.0054765367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04654556,0.0017895817,0.0021332288,0.0028026148,0.028820401,0.011686178,0.0084957965,0.038175322,0.0023201152],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020738562,0.000013185074,0.00011036117,0.0000616352,0.000012199434,0.00009860451,0.0019260928,0.00012303662,0.00014357109,0.95368844,0.041064855,0.0027374057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000121051664,0.00007296461,0.0023183455,0.0008169297,0.00008406221,0.00027769658,0.0016911639,0.00048973353,0.0007580101,0.14643653,0.8466387,0.00029481231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24711357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24185096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24711357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018043451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045708206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49135047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W593107511","doi":"10.21991/c9k957","title":"QUÉBEC AND ENGLISH CANADA: THE POLITICS OF TERRITORY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Geography; Ethnology; History; Law","score_opus":0.02826247390543992,"score_gpt":0.2152937621697477,"score_spread":0.18703128826430776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W593107511","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2069056,0.055411365,0.0009876083,0.1738046,0.0008683778,0.000069154354,0.0018826745,0.00006771668,0.560003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86026144,0.008612283,0.0005240044,0.0069951527,0.00012315693,0.000050456532,0.00024748236,0.0000570189,0.12312898],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99663144,0.00067012926,0.000047066886,0.00022576448,0.00067453744,0.0017510384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99639505,0.0009180953,0.00017975656,0.000089887835,0.0012488625,0.0011683621],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018874257,0.0003933241,0.00057610223,0.002197963,0.02444137,0.0133342855,0.0020760077,0.003928912,0.021130634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004471045,0.000429392,0.00046308053,0.006239754,0.009860665,0.003446361,0.0027170973,0.0038261078,0.0005319316],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012502768,0.000055471708,0.011997908,0.00018646472,0.000070463626,0.00073166325,0.03593287,0.0011645552,0.00038320513,0.8014222,0.12408377,0.023846382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009410864,0.000023899891,0.09734353,0.0007620572,0.00013019543,0.00014468002,0.073813096,0.0009777359,0.00029935682,0.02403326,0.8021997,0.00017838323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99880147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17969216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17969216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21753281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9514408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W597023446","doi":"10.21991/c9n95v","title":"The Applicability of Section 7 of the Charter to Oil and Gas Development in Alberta","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Context (archaeology); Human rights; Notice; Law; Section (typography); Political science; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology; History; Business","score_opus":0.018106264116662503,"score_gpt":0.2447264006003403,"score_spread":0.2266201364836778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W597023446","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0799077,0.0040184795,0.0021766,0.052505184,0.001032733,0.00017502277,0.00030352245,0.00009590072,0.85978484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6898571,0.0029233503,0.0038111715,0.024436167,0.00025798252,0.00011454927,0.00027044586,0.00004737462,0.27828184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929142,0.0010944222,0.00018447964,0.00054904615,0.0026325765,0.0026252444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963491,0.0016155898,0.00015252345,0.00022063433,0.0011551265,0.00050706975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056911525,0.0002505558,0.0003147388,0.0011445355,0.013659379,0.008912778,0.0024419716,0.0052147056,0.0062067667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008098451,0.0004511603,0.0003870988,0.0011586105,0.008669751,0.0013407099,0.0029821936,0.005623811,0.00033777955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030224479,0.00002366575,0.0015490792,0.000039589388,0.000008961483,0.00063486863,0.0030779277,0.0014689672,0.0006220648,0.9633889,0.019980745,0.009174975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057143207,0.00007310366,0.018395782,0.00036433662,0.000059363578,0.00023086063,0.008654633,0.004226391,0.0014840846,0.11422894,0.85196763,0.00025765592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96102285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9769712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.070050545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.070050545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12389688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50825465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W59782060","doi":"10.21991/c9jh37","title":"Where did Trudeau go wrong? On the Question of Nationalism and Charter Patriotism in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nationalism; Patriotism; Universalism; Charter; Political science; Politics; Commit; Loyalty; Liberalism; Democracy; Law; Political economy; Sociology","score_opus":0.015528198266479224,"score_gpt":0.21892409791808665,"score_spread":0.20339589965160743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W59782060","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41209048,0.010480786,0.0012688463,0.14170672,0.0004935656,0.000080743484,0.0006466311,0.00008448153,0.43314776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9582023,0.0017360275,0.00036611475,0.0026404697,0.000035122703,0.00001056694,0.000067776884,0.00003789241,0.036903817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99686676,0.00031551096,0.000041922343,0.00033156935,0.000749206,0.0016949398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975567,0.0005156839,0.00013503761,0.000082947874,0.0010657175,0.00064378895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002117463,0.00020948325,0.0004938547,0.0016562357,0.030975847,0.009525963,0.0016064217,0.0024669243,0.00779029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060599195,0.00026529125,0.00030343997,0.0030485564,0.013299574,0.0023819108,0.0023450316,0.0036819708,0.0002355388],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060076432,0.000024283236,0.007509006,0.000057872934,0.000015743659,0.00040441987,0.03185506,0.00047805998,0.00026068153,0.9114031,0.029798025,0.01813365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006752362,0.00005065554,0.071841195,0.0005065417,0.000098918965,0.00026589577,0.14664614,0.0031334301,0.0011765053,0.08261889,0.6933149,0.0002793843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99825126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20975618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20975618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20843822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91657084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W59807012","doi":"10.21991/c9fh39","title":"THE STATUS AND RIGHTS OF THE JAMES BAY CREES IN THE CONTEXT OF QUÉBEC SECESSION FROM CANADA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"African Botany and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Grand Council of the Crees","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Bay; Context (archaeology); Political science; Sociology; Law; Geography; Archaeology; Politics","score_opus":0.014939260237199272,"score_gpt":0.1890420072060619,"score_spread":0.17410274696886263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W59807012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80642045,0.0031718097,0.00021655063,0.029503232,0.00016053389,0.000058289814,0.00037907955,0.000009016878,0.16008104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9721711,0.00072637707,0.000101075515,0.0024728542,0.000022148062,0.000022284548,0.00006338755,0.000008450738,0.02441228],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99372065,0.0007361384,0.0000971907,0.0002879141,0.00084877934,0.0043093865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922246,0.0019426782,0.0006390978,0.00017152702,0.0029776413,0.002044473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003236277,0.00028978736,0.00058968493,0.001908088,0.036615536,0.012926915,0.0028330914,0.0045506177,0.008079081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007337521,0.0005272791,0.00046812007,0.0032701744,0.014196238,0.0025069711,0.003883746,0.007003988,0.0002427975],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041305055,0.00014590863,0.06984688,0.00019110224,0.00011403447,0.0035546555,0.3326851,0.001591311,0.001673593,0.51628846,0.04376784,0.029728107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008231268,0.00008374666,0.20534286,0.0008939872,0.00015784966,0.00038142139,0.41735098,0.0009981968,0.0010491761,0.010249315,0.3629776,0.00043256415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9978237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99932325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19654125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19654125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16225001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93189824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W60483583","doi":"10.21991/c9096b","title":"FREE SPEECH AND ITS HARMS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"History and Theory of Mathematics","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Free speech; Linguistics; Psychology; Speech recognition; Computer science; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.06823700513136713,"score_gpt":0.27140224038302335,"score_spread":0.20316523525165622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W60483583","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045949463,0.02266306,0.015958821,0.25539345,0.0017972705,0.00005059779,0.0001842724,0.0000729519,0.65793025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9192306,0.004189878,0.0015783363,0.014286318,0.002914246,0.00014181974,0.000059406262,0.00006960984,0.05752987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871432,0.0075743636,0.0003465196,0.001154144,0.0024822028,0.0012995875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98174393,0.013101812,0.000923204,0.0023863816,0.0012641866,0.0005805866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010668157,0.00058416417,0.0012831913,0.0024118205,0.009109783,0.008838143,0.0013865603,0.012530326,0.0069712615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02407623,0.0005029013,0.00080172863,0.0018373487,0.053499665,0.011695462,0.006603208,0.01602908,0.0010992781],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055234286,0.0000075609155,0.000040186922,0.000006560122,0.000002559429,0.000010702535,0.00040596258,0.00008748999,0.0000110150195,0.9970427,0.0013741307,0.0010054802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070316923,0.00000320325,0.00006694141,0.000016192362,0.000002529293,0.000013359099,0.00023029673,0.00008916796,0.000024303394,0.98674357,0.01279909,0.0000043129808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067824884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00393239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012530326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054779258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003961335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056419313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W605094940","doi":"10.21991/c9th5g","title":"COMMITTEE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF CANADA V. CANADA: EXPRESSION ON PUBLIC PROPERTY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Property (philosophy); Expression (computer science); Political science; Public administration; Law; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.07212678137162992,"score_gpt":0.2714665961266507,"score_spread":0.19933981475502077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W605094940","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011293334,0.006733237,0.0027664462,0.2301147,0.0035601058,0.0012176246,0.00846992,0.00058173697,0.7352629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13403429,0.004846555,0.0055707805,0.16387856,0.00076120085,0.0008978329,0.002464142,0.0004734488,0.68707323],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97287536,0.0018739698,0.0010286355,0.0013052167,0.015589482,0.0073274174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96743983,0.0051619792,0.00076887076,0.0012040768,0.020890977,0.004534268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009960362,0.001152549,0.001054231,0.0033028556,0.026151722,0.013901942,0.006076831,0.021536041,0.023837635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028222568,0.0017833242,0.0016558281,0.004457285,0.006363076,0.003060043,0.0034317987,0.0150196,0.004877857],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004621178,0.000055216344,0.0013835644,0.000098377655,0.000028284114,0.00015855703,0.0015256427,0.0002643551,0.0005440381,0.12140509,0.86747974,0.007010965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007672968,0.000020213409,0.008295238,0.0003740221,0.00008107368,0.000052210045,0.002032718,0.0003439812,0.0007121552,0.0073586907,0.980441,0.00021198393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99263555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99608326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.112000406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.112000406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.44872603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8126236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W610879667","doi":"10.21991/c9rh33","title":"CLASS ROOMS, COURT ROOMS, WAR ROOMS, CELLS: MADAM JUSTICE LOUISE ARBOUR, CANADA’S NEWEST COURT JUSTICE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Art, Politics, and Modernism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Madam; Economic Justice; Law; Class (philosophy); Art; Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0439238115492658,"score_gpt":0.231895329779609,"score_spread":0.1879715182303432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W610879667","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0120542245,0.01839881,0.0009873651,0.2824924,0.011648115,0.00057835557,0.008108885,0.0007398303,0.664992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02484633,0.0023900357,0.0005627049,0.035318863,0.0004037035,0.00010317177,0.00048473442,0.00014506088,0.93574536],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981793,0.000104042956,0.000041580308,0.00020969365,0.0006657349,0.00079962506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99708956,0.0002543196,0.00006698778,0.0000480633,0.0012284397,0.0013125787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009451173,0.0009049334,0.00052819436,0.0012184039,0.0488465,0.008495458,0.0027923512,0.008710561,0.15113012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031171339,0.0011050054,0.00057017524,0.0013609818,0.0023724434,0.0019815464,0.0025817917,0.009615554,0.017551105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010490684,0.000017838636,0.0005213504,0.000023604356,0.000003844459,0.00008369572,0.0005444982,0.00004913756,0.00009623401,0.0038132903,0.9894136,0.00542249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002070391,0.000008923351,0.0069629713,0.00008506756,0.000011994543,0.000035270736,0.003406602,0.00008084964,0.00014445839,0.0005519053,0.9886568,0.000034304903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9893083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99862885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15113012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.060393173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.122750126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50558066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W612954220","doi":"10.21991/c9695t","title":"La gestion de la diversité religieuse en milieu scolaire : le modèle « Made in Alberta »","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Religious Education and Schools","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Sociology; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.02373545638127282,"score_gpt":0.2656441628089217,"score_spread":0.2419087064276489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W612954220","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21844135,0.003470199,0.0043341285,0.0881822,0.0002917703,0.000054791908,0.00015358478,0.00007035669,0.6850016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95477396,0.0009330082,0.0009487808,0.0012133992,0.0000268788,0.0000138768,0.000024563824,0.000020672745,0.04204484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985869,0.0004323208,0.000012731736,0.00014046571,0.0002963103,0.0005313077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988612,0.00021949044,0.000081668,0.00009331902,0.00025541932,0.0004888537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014550955,0.00038272893,0.0002362678,0.0011260868,0.01621331,0.009677686,0.0016229638,0.0020431604,0.006257297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019997861,0.00023780028,0.00024766958,0.0018202481,0.03320968,0.002526006,0.0048489543,0.0025826292,0.00029686507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030460938,0.00002284138,0.008830563,0.00003587543,0.00000950734,0.00030761244,0.08065479,0.00056014245,0.00020315844,0.88309354,0.007665753,0.018585796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043193042,0.000049767925,0.032156654,0.0005365605,0.000055913442,0.00025106888,0.28202793,0.0014919703,0.00047661163,0.21571799,0.46709508,0.000097258526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9474585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97411853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062990986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.062990986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06485543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45703375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W614001618","doi":"10.21991/c97t0d","title":"APPLYING THE CHARTER: WHAT IS GOVERNMENT?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Economic Zones and Regional Development","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04622712696463133,"score_gpt":0.20015380396568644,"score_spread":0.1539266770010551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W614001618","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.067038044,0.005250309,0.010345024,0.43466157,0.0042047906,0.00030292798,0.00039450053,0.00008430353,0.4777185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70162463,0.002390024,0.0041939965,0.13060786,0.004090487,0.0006244732,0.0001877752,0.000118053504,0.1561627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98495746,0.007929166,0.0005729023,0.001034459,0.0023105168,0.0031954842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98868227,0.008501658,0.0007316834,0.00065912766,0.0008900129,0.0005353197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026073797,0.00050713576,0.0009183497,0.0012578047,0.0110222325,0.011510959,0.0027602566,0.024658874,0.010001557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035863567,0.0006947324,0.0011648956,0.0021560593,0.01274877,0.012673945,0.0060407217,0.015968358,0.0013011954],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001647276,0.000028045197,0.0003996044,0.000018688188,0.0000040166124,0.000159618,0.0018908306,0.00010682002,0.00006970415,0.9538338,0.039218925,0.004253394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010889807,0.00009744362,0.00470089,0.00056297675,0.00004977341,0.00045723267,0.01056504,0.0015681629,0.00109198,0.6135574,0.36712083,0.000119501594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037326124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046935465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037326124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067774565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010575577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13789308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W619025002","doi":"10.21991/c90d4m","title":"WAR AND PEACE- AN ISRAELI PERSPECTIVE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Offensive; Law of war; Spanish Civil War; International law; State (computer science); Just war theory; Independence (probability theory); Parliament; Politics","score_opus":0.04961020433464609,"score_gpt":0.2930853557797872,"score_spread":0.24347515144514115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W619025002","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01562532,0.08300546,0.0008482188,0.077106975,0.0017058398,0.000012836347,0.00007687726,0.00001181133,0.82160664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8869223,0.05679226,0.00055203575,0.01562766,0.0035992444,0.000048396832,0.00007056205,0.000023668008,0.036363833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990263,0.00050755055,0.000019132665,0.000068624024,0.000092883194,0.00028549312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995122,0.0002194078,0.000048933438,0.000018838466,0.00005380354,0.00014670454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013626979,0.00054205215,0.0003145339,0.0016596628,0.008346873,0.009227701,0.0006458077,0.0026162162,0.0077852164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007782017,0.00014943475,0.0001686235,0.0015037311,0.023619745,0.00496497,0.0029428294,0.0036206495,0.00077289646],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053818017,0.000013576275,0.00013978242,0.000026213593,0.0000022364002,0.000067269095,0.0037568866,0.000047896076,0.000022188537,0.9856285,0.0064112726,0.0038786577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002025923,0.000034732795,0.0011109727,0.0006465391,0.000005171419,0.00017726696,0.029552218,0.00015855898,0.000091471826,0.4747309,0.49346066,0.000011361255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007592187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009693392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009227701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077663357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040867906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05634898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W619485391","doi":"10.21991/c9s36d","title":"CANADIAN COUNCIL OF CHURCHES V. THE QUEEN: PUBLIC INTEREST TAKES A BACK SEAT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Public interest; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.13213460991169035,"score_gpt":0.27124201228967376,"score_spread":0.1391074023779834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W619485391","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018537948,0.0043715234,0.000725167,0.2423204,0.0022563573,0.00016001533,0.0015229279,0.000100556106,0.73000515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26929432,0.0031476396,0.0014145244,0.19858801,0.00055234,0.00014527336,0.00067047286,0.00012937502,0.5260581],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99020934,0.0006422457,0.00013984003,0.00041869195,0.005115163,0.0034747564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99225885,0.0016401773,0.0002446611,0.00026449657,0.0035118072,0.0020800796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004013799,0.00044265375,0.0005119135,0.0011669158,0.023473673,0.009094374,0.002658005,0.014349926,0.017933445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013433197,0.0008669895,0.0007101883,0.002134175,0.0043075955,0.0023465233,0.0023907516,0.011452309,0.0019751405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053283133,0.00003508672,0.002426375,0.0000954695,0.000018729019,0.00025813482,0.0021740594,0.00019322558,0.0004156235,0.23495412,0.752111,0.0072648525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000097462915,0.000021823142,0.013383911,0.00023667944,0.0000682998,0.000071723945,0.002952939,0.0003181974,0.00055677653,0.010749712,0.9714252,0.000117249656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9838473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9956494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06515719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06515719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19046861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47275072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W626926647","doi":"10.21991/c9pq1s","title":"JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE AND JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION: THE CASE OF PROVINCIAL COURT JUDGES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial independence; Judicial discretion; Judicial activism; Political science; Administration (probate law); Independence (probability theory); Judicial opinion; Law; Judicial review; Supreme court; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.03777566139922089,"score_gpt":0.2853693183396633,"score_spread":0.24759365694044239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W626926647","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5295316,0.0030767703,0.0018603024,0.082176164,0.00017842057,0.00007077175,0.00011346781,0.00001591764,0.3829766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98583245,0.00046302314,0.00025443613,0.0019692988,0.00006242127,0.000015261508,0.000013855812,0.000007719941,0.011381454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9841521,0.003572637,0.0002880707,0.0005851716,0.002738976,0.008663201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856257,0.007379393,0.0012405467,0.00052130735,0.0023169052,0.0029162348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008825588,0.0001920954,0.0006554417,0.0014014608,0.0314313,0.013120648,0.0023652753,0.007857904,0.0046745175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030169552,0.0006086694,0.00075611897,0.0044908933,0.016353752,0.0035589207,0.005278223,0.012091223,0.00031560627],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102138634,0.000068774934,0.008919462,0.000034424927,0.000034420656,0.0015183131,0.051968202,0.00079091557,0.00044441232,0.91770756,0.010575806,0.007835462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003243136,0.00010700543,0.10143302,0.00047683515,0.00029136066,0.0013574633,0.12784922,0.0054098656,0.0013640524,0.50456214,0.25650463,0.00032009868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8428888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94132656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8428888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05682724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11853276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4123124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6295017","doi":"10.21991/c9rq35","title":"QUEBEC AFTER MEECH: ON THE THRESHOLD","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.033636771087916975,"score_gpt":0.19350156531826143,"score_spread":0.15986479423034444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6295017","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025288483,0.02963057,0.001503134,0.6214753,0.007940878,0.00006857272,0.0014432811,0.00022196912,0.31242788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3689349,0.0071506742,0.0016471704,0.14660554,0.0010769811,0.000117036754,0.000562996,0.00042099511,0.47348368],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941645,0.0007261074,0.00013143485,0.00049715163,0.0019433252,0.0025374882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99535394,0.00071500876,0.00016729427,0.0002709251,0.002470825,0.0010219256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004018604,0.00051262253,0.0007583061,0.0012493386,0.022877984,0.014983777,0.002494489,0.012708012,0.03914241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007770618,0.00053904473,0.000752953,0.0024391913,0.0076748063,0.008078573,0.0040534814,0.0124790175,0.0017205905],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005759084,0.000037113437,0.0017884353,0.0000755706,0.000020616904,0.0003420298,0.0041792,0.0002841624,0.00040078082,0.4119516,0.55494875,0.02591414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028288143,0.000010607629,0.00769008,0.0002662279,0.000019704512,0.000060207596,0.005921239,0.0002039697,0.00032218217,0.013874246,0.9715047,0.00009858421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9906054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99443156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0930954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0930954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15357868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6754576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W64644032","doi":"10.21991/c9608v","title":"THE PROSTITUTION REFERENCE: SEXUAL COMMUNICATION AND THE STREETS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Gender, Feminism, and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Sociology; Psychology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.05580050968955305,"score_gpt":0.28828962045819323,"score_spread":0.23248911076864018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W64644032","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10789553,0.05951763,0.0022953611,0.26829275,0.0020555803,0.000026983564,0.0002458179,0.00004309988,0.55962735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9550276,0.012240962,0.0003527144,0.007022281,0.0024781523,0.000043555956,0.000045833116,0.0000341915,0.022754712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99663603,0.002373981,0.00007100918,0.00018061293,0.00036305352,0.00037524398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947429,0.0039307056,0.0005379431,0.00021836859,0.00023961926,0.00033055287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002944117,0.00032068236,0.00042342194,0.0025066398,0.009509604,0.013862482,0.00073990744,0.006779402,0.014572913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064309384,0.00025326817,0.00021287802,0.0035924553,0.028287916,0.010179228,0.005046044,0.004629028,0.00048579418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013449894,0.000024372595,0.00057795114,0.000046552814,0.0000022139532,0.00011400923,0.025458362,0.00004216837,0.00007689651,0.9575505,0.007152302,0.008941104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026067693,0.000059500097,0.008123934,0.00128165,0.000016706457,0.0006452773,0.12292568,0.00030797438,0.00041758595,0.43320286,0.43294027,0.000052470004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008872059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010728657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014572913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027833064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033167026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048751295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W64685650","doi":"10.21991/c9fq07","title":"CANADA'S QUEST FOR CONSTITUTIONAL PERFECTION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Perfection; Philosophy; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology","score_opus":0.04150483677496133,"score_gpt":0.28082084795185586,"score_spread":0.23931601117689452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W64685650","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047621794,0.0057547255,0.0027517956,0.31387606,0.0007996201,0.000078171506,0.00063097454,0.00013932149,0.6283475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8657715,0.0027198999,0.0028226047,0.03775217,0.00025285155,0.000078736884,0.00017365161,0.00015556115,0.09027302],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9801123,0.0025174026,0.00047412212,0.001752234,0.008401203,0.0067427424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9800735,0.004872279,0.00058834016,0.0013172446,0.00921501,0.0039335904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010443682,0.0004223971,0.0012386073,0.003245226,0.035438616,0.022277398,0.003073426,0.00892895,0.01269402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028070182,0.00089856324,0.00087714393,0.004215862,0.025477977,0.0061254282,0.006377207,0.016516361,0.00056322746],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016860646,0.000007850222,0.00045973057,0.000024341603,0.000013217764,0.000055386252,0.0021211423,0.00026571486,0.00005580623,0.9605796,0.031138306,0.0052619926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000112488684,0.000021088985,0.0053744484,0.0003278852,0.00007369798,0.00010026041,0.008196325,0.0011153324,0.00048215632,0.44074282,0.5432605,0.0001931039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99003696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9932833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84532785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15467213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.36147904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9804605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W64873473","doi":"10.21991/c9kx0j","title":"POLLUTING THE LAW TO PROTECT THE ENVIRONMENT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental law; Law; Environmental science; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.0377926620013333,"score_gpt":0.26271548956084795,"score_spread":0.22492282755951465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W64873473","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014059035,0.0056220335,0.013582337,0.25647482,0.004489555,0.00021819299,0.0001810941,0.00016307058,0.70520985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52741927,0.0059730806,0.018820208,0.19694239,0.00530657,0.00039114873,0.00018679722,0.00027217588,0.24468835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887117,0.0039238334,0.0005308197,0.0011890732,0.004008993,0.0016354702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917917,0.004865388,0.000551144,0.00093353196,0.0011240152,0.0007341999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012333851,0.00039574134,0.00076719915,0.0016782344,0.0081282295,0.010241755,0.0013607292,0.01701583,0.009055183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016681269,0.0005245156,0.0010104241,0.0011713682,0.017937426,0.00609521,0.0040150327,0.01412584,0.001572734],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004555221,0.000029818553,0.00014069949,0.000020874259,0.000005737602,0.000020707446,0.0005452401,0.00013826566,0.00035808294,0.9844795,0.0114057595,0.0028508133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043890235,0.000047660484,0.0009899692,0.00020516523,0.000034535267,0.00006900782,0.00077178667,0.00050763,0.0012807434,0.5916011,0.40439832,0.000050308456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01603515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01596441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01701583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00480211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0254227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06522846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W655760337","doi":"10.21991/c9766g","title":"BANQUO'S GHOST AND OTHER CONSTITUTIONAL INCUBUSES: SOME LESSONS FROM THE CHARLOTTETOWN PROCESS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Latin American and Latino Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.05233496453208133,"score_gpt":0.30884644886699547,"score_spread":0.25651148433491416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W655760337","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15303296,0.0035402637,0.015787376,0.23257516,0.00078489707,0.0001186079,0.00005485762,0.00007819426,0.59402764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9465568,0.00051674194,0.0019331932,0.010667236,0.00018291996,0.0001125806,0.000016618724,0.00009477705,0.039919056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98856306,0.007897556,0.00014785727,0.0007536317,0.0010004548,0.0016373778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9755028,0.018908404,0.0008234835,0.0014239516,0.0013441967,0.0019972501],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020118026,0.00035327135,0.00069493335,0.0013226628,0.030489082,0.018796008,0.0025614714,0.01174992,0.012945461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03630079,0.0004979942,0.00048375173,0.0021603608,0.06606478,0.02160004,0.010936235,0.016438428,0.0004616798],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006631225,0.000015972255,0.00014352318,0.0000067674655,8.572612e-7,0.00006745033,0.025894167,0.000037111364,0.000020906878,0.96947855,0.0025011976,0.0018268569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007673651,0.000018393279,0.0009817432,0.00020134448,0.0000067985275,0.000120779565,0.07541719,0.00059205364,0.00022024255,0.7436964,0.17861006,0.00005830262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.082593985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11568774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.917406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019708512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019907277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16422647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W67325372","doi":"10.21991/c97h3f","title":"THE NATURE OF EQUALITY: APPLES AND ORANGES / CHESTS AND BREASTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Art","score_opus":0.055230870342649785,"score_gpt":0.3128414258401433,"score_spread":0.2576105554974935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W67325372","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056635976,0.017841319,0.0053708237,0.15056439,0.001263196,0.00002454844,0.00006105479,0.000021665763,0.768217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95670044,0.0017534205,0.0010703341,0.009897566,0.00080298184,0.00005970297,0.000017177705,0.000039987495,0.029658314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99115515,0.0057079555,0.00014821075,0.0007470376,0.0011985824,0.0010431331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99569523,0.002610421,0.00030239782,0.00035658502,0.0003608055,0.0006745191],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006792563,0.00033538803,0.00084657304,0.0011762247,0.00970309,0.01710902,0.0011103727,0.006615214,0.011130585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008480895,0.0005202536,0.00036346063,0.0012606375,0.0679016,0.016829144,0.008093072,0.007932228,0.00059387315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010133759,0.000007691159,0.00007327617,0.000009705732,0.0000012304037,0.000018456522,0.0048398143,0.000017535785,0.00004321323,0.9905723,0.002154791,0.002251896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030343856,0.00001378287,0.0009449343,0.0001331428,0.000008062249,0.000099743804,0.014574685,0.00006952431,0.00013621523,0.8892381,0.09473188,0.000019620204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009490692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010058459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01710902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043248665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032032612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0372355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W70185218","doi":"10.21991/c9767v","title":"L’exil intérieur des Québécois dans le Canada de la Charte","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016017844713728868,"score_gpt":0.2108758309522723,"score_spread":0.19485798623854345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W70185218","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18326102,0.022930892,0.0030872861,0.13596463,0.0032891,0.00008864785,0.0013370696,0.00011249505,0.6499288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6323006,0.00605794,0.0008005889,0.008271229,0.00020786104,0.00003880651,0.00027224811,0.00010218588,0.3519485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976121,0.00039702645,0.000028667722,0.00038038008,0.0005866065,0.0009952121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976439,0.0002924014,0.0001416832,0.00008285125,0.0008764662,0.0009627283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011837154,0.00057745795,0.0004198246,0.0013720681,0.03023417,0.009394037,0.0010073967,0.0028883298,0.02504619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030980762,0.0003052622,0.00027637387,0.003024217,0.007935258,0.002982446,0.002395984,0.004583631,0.0013480104],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012968326,0.00004840048,0.018854206,0.00017098628,0.000037409878,0.0015489971,0.1305959,0.00047370073,0.00082164217,0.5320755,0.2453583,0.0698853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008352437,0.000013718161,0.01827281,0.0002666442,0.000012877081,0.00014862926,0.054341983,0.00023877704,0.00019371952,0.0041877753,0.92224604,0.000068645124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9949681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11698569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11698569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11254006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8487946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W70809028","doi":"10.21991/c98675","title":"An Opportune Moment: The Judicial Appointment Reforms and the Judicial Credentials Demanded by the Charter","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Law; Charter; Judicial activism; Judicial review; Accountability; Judicial independence; Transparency (behavior); Economic Justice; Appeal; Supreme court; Judicial discretion; Public administration","score_opus":0.03585155082644348,"score_gpt":0.2747012195231658,"score_spread":0.2388496686967223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W70809028","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038649246,0.0053794733,0.014984074,0.60234153,0.0136769,0.00029007602,0.0001755715,0.00027703872,0.32422608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73854184,0.0019153985,0.014686479,0.08686003,0.0069412896,0.00028006028,0.00009976224,0.00025856006,0.15041658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93610907,0.028207963,0.0025109504,0.0045256736,0.014907885,0.013738446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9647259,0.01697902,0.0029327755,0.0029020708,0.0064927875,0.0059674936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.051217046,0.00030759993,0.00059881626,0.0015675386,0.022685302,0.021735009,0.002584142,0.013804392,0.0060734823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10292935,0.0008973347,0.0006401107,0.0019506095,0.017824838,0.010373697,0.004686484,0.026537744,0.0013199572],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003197021,0.0000337235,0.00043448168,0.00002865578,0.0000020870189,0.00014567074,0.0051707053,0.00016084165,0.00026430163,0.91427463,0.065174334,0.0142786205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000071143455,0.00007991149,0.0044779633,0.00025536388,0.00001055872,0.00010244178,0.00597801,0.00051224796,0.00060849934,0.08332717,0.9044235,0.00015306054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14449117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30975804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14449117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031963296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.054508902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2873003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7195887","doi":"10.21991/c9gh27","title":"NAFTA AND THE FUTURE OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Transboundary Water Resource Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental regulation; International trade; Environmental policy; Political science; Business; Environmental planning; Natural resource economics; Economics; Environmental science","score_opus":0.013025213097747993,"score_gpt":0.21558924670958585,"score_spread":0.20256403361183786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7195887","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008806124,0.08060649,0.0013026608,0.684199,0.0030133286,0.000012495933,0.0001645574,0.00004116749,0.22185414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60963976,0.07176607,0.0030630964,0.21564893,0.010023097,0.00018639413,0.00032521045,0.00007822406,0.0892692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99168396,0.003321861,0.0002540454,0.0009496972,0.002243594,0.0015469067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926265,0.0042256517,0.0007297335,0.00042686384,0.0013852518,0.0006059889],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010165939,0.0003292657,0.00080649817,0.0020886878,0.0061541526,0.01235861,0.0010737957,0.01935032,0.009695675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012713135,0.00042011502,0.0010933492,0.0015655742,0.013853893,0.013421017,0.0029412196,0.010416387,0.0009376831],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019467672,0.000019572033,0.00026069777,0.000031975906,0.000009090676,0.00004659171,0.00040693296,0.000255429,0.000083293504,0.96537435,0.02627679,0.00721576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025147356,0.00001863022,0.0008657266,0.000362009,0.000013286449,0.000048601385,0.0009059897,0.00043464682,0.00006338761,0.47642338,0.52080363,0.00003553828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04279509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05202912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95720494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013792724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018812105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.100073695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W76022651","doi":"10.21991/c9bw82","title":"AMENDING THE CANADIAN CONSTITUTION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06688833277426015,"score_gpt":0.2938406459485605,"score_spread":0.22695231317430037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W76022651","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024636254,0.010620563,0.0018202045,0.15247877,0.008038406,0.00037005084,0.0019129507,0.0002195943,0.7999032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.348022,0.009558046,0.009646387,0.12824218,0.0019664126,0.00047736324,0.0013490078,0.0003179688,0.50042063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97905123,0.0017486368,0.00055987143,0.0013298804,0.009604194,0.007706193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844542,0.0020286287,0.0002802449,0.00090676115,0.010140891,0.0021892567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009131862,0.0007303982,0.00080792734,0.004189411,0.027239004,0.012952512,0.0031210128,0.010988596,0.013109076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028889963,0.00069271296,0.0013707477,0.004139258,0.0074173305,0.0027775709,0.004394643,0.0100224,0.0012166053],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042733216,0.000028126124,0.0014315979,0.00011563019,0.000021555403,0.00025989575,0.002819352,0.00080343784,0.0005479613,0.71473837,0.25612625,0.023065198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037867838,0.000014532507,0.007343102,0.00021604949,0.00004704587,0.000053294243,0.0022889874,0.00036586897,0.0004268448,0.019620832,0.9694676,0.00011803926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99596584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16251656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16251656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.37868947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97136205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7669431","doi":"10.21991/c9308x","title":"CANADA'S PROSPECTS STRESS AND COPING WITH QUEBEC’S IMPENDING REFERENDUM: A REPATRIATION ACT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal Military College of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Repatriation; Coping (psychology); Political science; Law; Psychology; Clinical psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.023112947372169897,"score_gpt":0.24369012312331945,"score_spread":0.22057717575114955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7669431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8416032,0.0020376742,0.00016524178,0.11307761,0.0003060176,0.000109470304,0.0009976161,0.00001658856,0.04168658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97267646,0.000998358,0.0001685311,0.008260458,0.000050963496,0.00007236151,0.00026131098,0.0000115358835,0.01749993],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968816,0.00051210023,0.00006461554,0.00014990417,0.0006485878,0.0017431028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98961115,0.0012660593,0.0008985912,0.00018219584,0.003069832,0.004972206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026411794,0.00032296873,0.0005029871,0.0010845239,0.030478075,0.00781877,0.0025908637,0.004937259,0.0066850767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007327859,0.00044371226,0.0007500494,0.0022216644,0.0046429303,0.0019446439,0.003288042,0.00651306,0.0003087399],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065664935,0.0017815499,0.49142,0.00026866424,0.0003370248,0.0020214953,0.19856174,0.0022825967,0.0008781582,0.047704425,0.19761488,0.05647284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001307389,0.00013300992,0.6618807,0.00034325584,0.00013942736,0.00010122007,0.24266931,0.0008824594,0.00024493632,0.0015356255,0.091698125,0.00024120313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9986658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8454594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1545406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23644353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98061305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W77205083","doi":"10.21991/c95d5j","title":"RELIGIOUS DISCOURSE IN THE PUBLIC SQUARE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Faith; Democracy; Politics; Public discourse; State (computer science); Public reason; Position (finance); Sociology; Separation of church and state; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05265537837368078,"score_gpt":0.32551957380082897,"score_spread":0.2728641954271482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W77205083","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2614245,0.0063864337,0.002809812,0.10081563,0.0006427993,0.000025810657,0.00003469261,0.000042616233,0.62781763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994079,0.0003666659,0.00016400126,0.0011227463,0.00014156762,0.0000062860972,0.0000042492184,0.000007960753,0.004107499],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906911,0.0074372753,0.00011882545,0.00033469446,0.0007216264,0.00069645967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991991,0.005772114,0.00076640525,0.00040045992,0.00033999493,0.000730093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0079956995,0.00019290538,0.00025570564,0.0014082071,0.010577693,0.00987301,0.0006359166,0.0036938654,0.009282715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010867638,0.00020718062,0.00021195851,0.001273423,0.0316977,0.007195961,0.0075611975,0.004193053,0.000629596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035343393,0.000048559505,0.0008463264,0.00004586547,0.0000047963863,0.00018172177,0.06887078,0.00011888101,0.00031124012,0.9155725,0.0042627514,0.009701218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007715441,0.000064452994,0.0036976223,0.00039342503,0.0000162901,0.00015649172,0.08345027,0.00063280517,0.00077221397,0.6044081,0.30629754,0.00003346189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028200666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030775329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010577693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005076096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030494872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0422858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W78933614","doi":"10.21991/c9565g","title":"FEDERALISM AND DEMOCRACY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Democracy; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.045444260375784154,"score_gpt":0.28556565195422384,"score_spread":0.2401213915784397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W78933614","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025297869,0.0507388,0.01620916,0.118829004,0.001998727,0.00004793818,0.000205284,0.000052310814,0.7866209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89439666,0.01044589,0.0037155428,0.01601665,0.003949276,0.00015193548,0.000105945845,0.00004805721,0.071169935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978776,0.001186037,0.00006198444,0.00031106785,0.0002445435,0.00031876878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982333,0.0012619793,0.00012998175,0.00016053878,0.00014247412,0.0000717889],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00304153,0.00044167458,0.0006198715,0.0011001235,0.0045760856,0.0057861796,0.00061469397,0.0054196054,0.008172616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004889664,0.0002903839,0.00045629047,0.0016046438,0.016910592,0.0061456272,0.0017593406,0.0062717716,0.00088566355],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033301098,0.0000037742575,0.000052562064,0.00000679905,0.0000019631577,0.0000058390483,0.00013598321,0.00006330432,0.000011609688,0.9976451,0.0013506376,0.0007191498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009861818,0.0000045555053,0.00015164491,0.000019595313,0.0000028045508,0.000014136941,0.0001002347,0.000085712476,0.00003725409,0.9728229,0.026747838,0.0000034860286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010675944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009302162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010675944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004681862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003080996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033969402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W79884336","doi":"10.21991/c9j380","title":"Failing Students by Taking a Pass on the Charter in Pridgen v University of Calgary","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.02695350916186013,"score_gpt":0.2769865945668648,"score_spread":0.2500330854050047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W79884336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8247431,0.0007464605,0.00059055345,0.08288101,0.00071732205,0.00014247806,0.00011032049,0.00003101535,0.090037756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9643162,0.00035501146,0.00043022927,0.014449057,0.00006777845,0.00003425505,0.000047445814,0.000022338303,0.020277709],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.982457,0.0031649873,0.00062055467,0.0012015366,0.0034768311,0.009079012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97957397,0.00825526,0.00199699,0.00069277216,0.0035675378,0.005913462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012085671,0.00042367406,0.0013018864,0.0017962124,0.036761563,0.012447051,0.0028854692,0.011647532,0.0055584847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046075046,0.0007674536,0.0007062901,0.0022718064,0.016580803,0.0033241715,0.00829696,0.023792788,0.0006996135],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004838764,0.00063073816,0.1400509,0.00021545615,0.000115926945,0.014811821,0.34809646,0.0011881728,0.0013531221,0.3247302,0.11724265,0.051080696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020970247,0.00046610256,0.2382915,0.0012548611,0.00032420817,0.0016150599,0.4969685,0.0014932074,0.0070930333,0.08036493,0.17140743,0.0005115185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6233746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8472529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37662542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03162968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05429296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75768685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W79952626","doi":"10.21991/c9v094","title":"The Unlikely Union of Same-Sex Marriage, Polygamy and the Charter in Court","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Government (linguistics); Test (biology); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030054171413202796,"score_gpt":0.2729775993521866,"score_spread":0.24292342793898378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W79952626","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19842027,0.0037839564,0.004059949,0.17879525,0.00080613577,0.0000546614,0.00012300492,0.000040468865,0.61391634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9778937,0.00038940582,0.00027891115,0.00698361,0.00017376253,0.000015527983,0.00001750186,0.000009566386,0.01423787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916055,0.002363598,0.00011940312,0.0012703979,0.0018017071,0.0028393462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937925,0.0028346467,0.0005167794,0.00044353172,0.0009427539,0.0014698873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067351125,0.00015936578,0.00038670027,0.0009336949,0.023227196,0.0134587,0.0016900693,0.007112079,0.008466673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018697033,0.00029296504,0.00021288329,0.0011093499,0.03566061,0.004845552,0.005344171,0.010060818,0.0005375727],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011745964,0.000012055882,0.0015793863,0.000010012126,0.0000033266806,0.00017290983,0.00421665,0.000060622835,0.0000593935,0.9802454,0.008398035,0.0052304375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006403631,0.00004923305,0.013494582,0.00034002878,0.00004043267,0.000535475,0.035321273,0.0012934858,0.0006368858,0.66659355,0.28153718,0.00009374359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.51874465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6906184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51874465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02175116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026606146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9681791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W812244214","doi":"10.21991/c9h091","title":"Judicialization or Renunciation? Judges in Today’s Landscape of Anti-Terrorism Laws","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Terrorism; Judicial review; Political science; Constitution; Renunciation; Suspect; Constitutional law; Enforcement","score_opus":0.0675757815920345,"score_gpt":0.33689811964666444,"score_spread":0.2693223380546299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W812244214","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06374898,0.022471912,0.009406642,0.72910905,0.0058370843,0.00007340037,0.000086341235,0.00013519205,0.16913143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9111776,0.0048208614,0.0022251857,0.060261853,0.0055392506,0.00008424764,0.000051349572,0.00012184462,0.01571775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9526609,0.025158634,0.0016818261,0.006485328,0.006854557,0.007158877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95677423,0.026006972,0.0030800686,0.0037257674,0.00639489,0.0040180557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.053132467,0.0002576151,0.00076317374,0.0019054925,0.012417222,0.022066379,0.0037389763,0.011981182,0.0048641455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08259173,0.0006830938,0.00058823696,0.0017497045,0.042243384,0.0149859525,0.0063806227,0.017913233,0.000804504],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028758745,0.000029391647,0.0008803252,0.00006280355,0.0000101297655,0.00019453955,0.0076750973,0.00018720322,0.00038024932,0.9444661,0.028312506,0.01777292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012692761,0.00009076861,0.0047073932,0.0005550872,0.000033253575,0.00023035363,0.0138873,0.00094286865,0.0008400475,0.52671564,0.4517327,0.00013759492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013424067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012710261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053132467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009377682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011576136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28099465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W8159521","doi":"10.21991/c9w96d","title":"PUBLIC SCHOOL BOARDS’ ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA V. ALBERTA THE ARGUMENTS FAVOURING CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION FOR ALBERTA’S PUBLIC SCHOOL BOARDS: WOLVES IN SHEEP’S CLOTHING","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Clothing; Public administration; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.11944392349460421,"score_gpt":0.31082140409966746,"score_spread":0.19137748060506327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W8159521","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049903132,0.0033957348,0.001301833,0.17534114,0.0020169646,0.00011810913,0.00038710504,0.00011372914,0.76742226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5065191,0.0015863855,0.0015278201,0.10444527,0.0005579092,0.000105557054,0.00028525977,0.000052372816,0.3849204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903149,0.0011610604,0.0001953296,0.0005399965,0.003498572,0.004290067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98937804,0.0040487754,0.00050630665,0.0003627447,0.0026718338,0.0030322117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072628427,0.00040509715,0.00038326913,0.0010661656,0.016177192,0.009758113,0.002753571,0.013984646,0.015865697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014678654,0.0010453858,0.00052901387,0.0012760126,0.0074098846,0.0020024716,0.0025265084,0.010829098,0.0012780781],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010762285,0.00008845252,0.005553915,0.00010367176,0.000029535408,0.0006969739,0.006011411,0.0005047971,0.0012208596,0.68718934,0.28365192,0.014841511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013704973,0.00006140787,0.0276026,0.00034984775,0.00007145836,0.000103572274,0.0060532154,0.0003357121,0.0009673751,0.021384764,0.94282246,0.00011060491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8977177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96794116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.102282286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035550844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09880668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25794065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W84780611","doi":"10.21991/c9c08d","title":"\"AS I SEE IT, RENE...\" SAID SIR JOHN","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Biblical Studies and Interpretation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.049784026039498934,"score_gpt":0.24590214615749645,"score_spread":0.1961181201179975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W84780611","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016664874,0.010150324,0.0007666515,0.73746026,0.042519346,0.00004978288,0.00016596193,0.00023771814,0.20698354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012733492,0.0032497835,0.00038197506,0.1636404,0.005338132,0.000032380984,0.00006887052,0.00017232588,0.8143827],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839056,0.00042003667,0.000052349016,0.00023966248,0.00058542046,0.00031191445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847037,0.00029910702,0.000098253666,0.00007750595,0.0006007167,0.00045408146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018353924,0.0005674468,0.0005642699,0.0007028047,0.007741752,0.0059654415,0.0007362489,0.006365766,0.071373485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069611613,0.00047053007,0.00041486943,0.00056247454,0.0027524475,0.0044912854,0.0028385564,0.014555489,0.02746906],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020536161,0.000007839405,0.00015986388,0.00004108926,0.000002267126,0.00012363082,0.0009174928,0.000010663198,0.00021022208,0.013524905,0.9780844,0.0068970467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022828622,0.000004073358,0.00019893544,0.000040582614,0.0000014735865,0.0000743142,0.0011276964,0.0000107446895,0.00012756856,0.00066025637,0.9977437,0.00000832222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018645614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048279762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.071373485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021786513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003094847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2387681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W85857415","doi":"10.21991/c9d962","title":"Redressing the Harms of Government (In)Action: A Section 7 Versus Section 15 Charter Showdown","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Redress; Harm; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Supreme court; Action (physics); Framing (construction); Law and economics; Sociology; Business; History","score_opus":0.048625248510399545,"score_gpt":0.30340101101388656,"score_spread":0.254775762503487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W85857415","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.110180356,0.011171596,0.015355415,0.1839833,0.007954885,0.00024350086,0.00014807109,0.00036081873,0.6706021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8003148,0.006244158,0.008632521,0.13469243,0.004471016,0.00030519048,0.00010080193,0.00014637684,0.04509265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9831549,0.0047844863,0.00076374685,0.0012425164,0.0060032313,0.0040509813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98168564,0.013447019,0.0014280839,0.00084224774,0.0018108512,0.00078618276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022321342,0.00064959016,0.00076925854,0.0017242448,0.008527035,0.015127894,0.003872346,0.018515015,0.004234876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021351963,0.0006700615,0.0013432833,0.00094848167,0.02045206,0.007494788,0.0063184076,0.017464824,0.00092729967],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039314287,0.000055017295,0.0010421642,0.00008328718,0.000011754838,0.0006662311,0.003908962,0.00039411162,0.0008128312,0.9543526,0.02706034,0.011573288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011458273,0.0010509354,0.013160066,0.0030764325,0.00029199707,0.001665347,0.015607226,0.0041396203,0.008812971,0.33604038,0.61548465,0.000555733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027319774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.055135433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9726802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077730333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019075764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11804795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W86757145","doi":"10.21991/c9p94s","title":"LIVING TREE OR WIRED BONSAI? THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT'S CONSTITUTIONAL PROPOSALS ON THE ECONOMIC UNION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Tree (set theory); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.03361941563226558,"score_gpt":0.2190557494544575,"score_spread":0.1854363338221919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W86757145","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021290628,0.006416716,0.00520541,0.3508416,0.01980109,0.0002567734,0.000990855,0.0002624209,0.5949345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34290534,0.0026678287,0.0064708563,0.35956612,0.009907819,0.0010558618,0.00049443287,0.00033087,0.27660087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9818309,0.005206188,0.000863266,0.0019786104,0.0046987273,0.005422342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99233973,0.00457027,0.00044835894,0.0007559656,0.0010202203,0.00086551707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021127963,0.0012691825,0.002330753,0.0026041882,0.016885063,0.023418253,0.005057831,0.04495167,0.0135716135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035080213,0.0018187359,0.0017117171,0.0030224922,0.016165866,0.009896442,0.0054566343,0.037750248,0.003336151],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037574693,0.000067785346,0.00011793677,0.000019887637,0.000009728104,0.000044271103,0.00057227205,0.00013302216,0.00014377569,0.93422467,0.061231934,0.003397102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023570303,0.00010815783,0.002559483,0.0004893704,0.00011065463,0.00008510944,0.0015921878,0.00092442177,0.00083629997,0.40702015,0.5857492,0.00028925933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07941895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.113797955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92058104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0139250355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025241064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15791339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W88989832","doi":"10.21991/c9cd41","title":"COMMITMENT AND COMMUNITY IN THE INTER-REFERENDUM PERIOD","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Period (music); Political science; Law; Politics; Art","score_opus":0.09384170883466772,"score_gpt":0.2406480322603349,"score_spread":0.14680632342566718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W88989832","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9389276,0.00033463788,0.0056336187,0.0023531574,0.000040606672,0.000051343297,0.00011763228,0.000017902916,0.05252347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965538,0.000040688785,0.0002054324,0.000068856265,0.000016005248,0.000016625485,0.000025270265,0.000004581415,0.0030687274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785197,0.00062015693,0.000063815874,0.00025474915,0.00018947695,0.0010198444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867666,0.0063886633,0.0021271217,0.0006657279,0.00068129686,0.0033706191],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005102463,0.00016273408,0.00085607887,0.00079411454,0.0032013266,0.0047393055,0.0010971653,0.0021213696,0.013594633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016532945,0.00032926287,0.00033897866,0.0009933008,0.0028222816,0.0046373825,0.0034125098,0.0035581903,0.0004341363],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020273773,0.0010600063,0.043028012,0.00008530368,0.000090387985,0.00078917504,0.00998475,0.0058934554,0.0016985732,0.89171356,0.003583846,0.040045578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005043363,0.0007473021,0.16552588,0.00010042321,0.00008224883,0.0002852101,0.02953772,0.018958315,0.00087731535,0.7661707,0.01709558,0.000114998926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009222406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010630085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013594633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023023984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019253917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045478582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W89025490","doi":"10.21991/c9zm2m","title":"Drivers Needed: Tough Choices from Alberta v. Wilson Colony of Hutterian Brethren","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.031467329142535354,"score_gpt":0.26442471498762216,"score_spread":0.2329573858450868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W89025490","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047769133,0.002584703,0.0005138487,0.16021079,0.0017686484,0.00018614919,0.0010875703,0.00009189156,0.7857872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35402045,0.0017471344,0.0011518201,0.1524568,0.00035188865,0.00014021217,0.00090725237,0.00011308066,0.4891113],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943711,0.00041435836,0.00009799092,0.00025778468,0.0028094798,0.0020493097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99569666,0.0010104234,0.00011536003,0.00017207258,0.0015626262,0.0014427907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041373027,0.0005095471,0.0004524737,0.0012590903,0.020680655,0.008555758,0.0023783771,0.009712176,0.020984858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008112729,0.00071912544,0.0004596469,0.0014848913,0.002973808,0.001989809,0.0032116966,0.009453023,0.0016446022],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001134695,0.00008805627,0.007479192,0.00006228667,0.000023460057,0.0014126925,0.0058096224,0.0004817276,0.0005135506,0.22915293,0.7337653,0.02109784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010529212,0.000049049042,0.031516008,0.0002936637,0.00006361665,0.0002176037,0.014707005,0.0005690404,0.00063763704,0.03216407,0.91944087,0.00023607707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.945367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9893745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05463302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03521347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09666401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2554928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W89745944","doi":"10.21991/c9b36c","title":"LIVING IN A MATERIAL WORLD: PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THE CHARTER","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Property (philosophy); Property rights; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0383075225704225,"score_gpt":0.2795285920486006,"score_spread":0.2412210694781781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W89745944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023047926,0.0057364902,0.020284863,0.10705179,0.001613945,0.00009472776,0.00026541227,0.00009581294,0.8418091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8724921,0.00249341,0.008102536,0.018729601,0.002705508,0.00036376755,0.00015277279,0.00010107579,0.094859295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944718,0.0027269905,0.00017397183,0.0006256855,0.00094701076,0.0010547192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99696773,0.0016949085,0.0002937864,0.00034850457,0.00036841695,0.00032661445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0080997655,0.00045676893,0.0005685737,0.00096163567,0.010707896,0.015220729,0.0018138868,0.011618863,0.0065738778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008485973,0.00037486834,0.0007830704,0.0015364059,0.030139556,0.013109866,0.003758671,0.011909195,0.0006538034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018743584,0.0000038105857,0.000011936876,0.0000023202344,3.3420534e-7,0.000008747208,0.0002585389,0.000028902963,0.000011946112,0.99696845,0.002365302,0.0003377594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023945684,0.00001790979,0.00040341518,0.00009209271,0.0000064999153,0.000039192517,0.0009427308,0.0004206193,0.00015104376,0.89512515,0.10274592,0.000031541516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026646156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02400917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026646156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065403865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011327774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05298215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W89911378","doi":"10.21991/c9rq2s","title":"ADLER V. ONTARIO: THE TROUBLING LEGACY OF A COMPROMISE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05131915634685788,"score_gpt":0.20915884503321752,"score_spread":0.15783968868635964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W89911378","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049754415,0.008953749,0.0012098097,0.25949475,0.00078219274,0.00007240726,0.00034359054,0.000054363867,0.6793347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6936406,0.0073674037,0.0014228702,0.09917435,0.0005570324,0.000096522184,0.000112654365,0.00007881474,0.19754969],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99393976,0.0009109041,0.00017388076,0.0006046141,0.0023732302,0.0019975665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99635834,0.0015576971,0.00029636265,0.00020561318,0.0010285091,0.0005535452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029854479,0.0003048126,0.00038427027,0.0010379648,0.030722259,0.007840084,0.0016559126,0.012082933,0.00626782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0084491735,0.0005921927,0.00044525322,0.0019644848,0.012604631,0.0029973339,0.0027827597,0.0076939864,0.00049351936],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057316094,0.000012383966,0.0027302261,0.0000903183,0.000018911587,0.0017261175,0.020116923,0.00034021938,0.0005177154,0.77187,0.1912667,0.011253156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000472181,0.000016518286,0.00606537,0.0003386617,0.000044737655,0.00047657627,0.012817363,0.00033487866,0.00047085804,0.05810827,0.92118096,0.000098677956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96827054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9861012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07565325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07565325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08974628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5489053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W91551210","doi":"10.21991/c95w9w","title":"VRIEND, RIGHTS AND DEMOCRACY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Human rights; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.036506925187303994,"score_gpt":0.20697124311460052,"score_spread":0.17046431792729652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W91551210","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010309538,0.43244305,0.0067041474,0.11874419,0.003104435,0.00005623357,0.0005649613,0.00008652056,0.42798704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61740196,0.13816534,0.00800836,0.044267118,0.005631271,0.00058637315,0.0003207876,0.0002791624,0.18533963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808085,0.0009094681,0.00011852704,0.00025364285,0.00037250353,0.0002650295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99747485,0.0020571572,0.00014425738,0.00011204079,0.000156118,0.00005560366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025944198,0.0009540238,0.000756798,0.0018327092,0.0070576747,0.008252957,0.0017174615,0.01402148,0.009987709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057046926,0.00080148,0.0005991794,0.0032117285,0.010492552,0.010605236,0.0025125088,0.008655746,0.0017782416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021639396,0.000016787524,0.00014715616,0.00008667174,0.000007331716,0.00009915258,0.002564186,0.00015489015,0.00007222741,0.9491066,0.041761123,0.0059623607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006883759,0.000019669778,0.0015738196,0.0005139083,0.000029171528,0.00017752101,0.0036621708,0.0002603531,0.00031300448,0.5445139,0.44883963,0.000027945116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044019796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.086944476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044019796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005582924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035994942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.087527156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W93254731","doi":"10.21991/c9jq1j","title":"KEEPING RELIGIOUS FUNDAMENTALISM UNDER WRAPS: THE CLOTHING CONTROVERSY IN SELECTED EUROPEAN COUNTRIES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Clothing; Multiculturalism; Islam; Fundamentalism; Government (linguistics); Law; Human rights; Political science; Secularism; Terrorism; Sociology; History; Politics","score_opus":0.030083252814586223,"score_gpt":0.2688753680402263,"score_spread":0.2387921152256401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W93254731","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.943355,0.01104196,0.000095159,0.004512009,0.00007951575,0.000011560931,0.000040584484,0.0000022815923,0.040861968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959092,0.0015514069,0.000041530275,0.0014498236,0.000031728177,0.0000035433823,0.000027067366,0.0000034046038,0.0009823075],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778086,0.001186396,0.00010617815,0.00017890033,0.00018288764,0.0005647376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981371,0.0007725976,0.0004349224,0.00012663055,0.00019569111,0.00033306057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052062673,0.00026997138,0.00039126052,0.002074943,0.005784597,0.006103616,0.00068902655,0.0024848697,0.0018783564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035049757,0.00016649363,0.00029025908,0.00309947,0.007064953,0.0018757327,0.0034461892,0.0013318027,0.00010954305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010534535,0.00050737156,0.26856706,0.00066457834,0.0002811129,0.009090157,0.4259974,0.00038739643,0.0017414871,0.1648101,0.013912891,0.1129869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008654227,0.00022453118,0.533971,0.001184712,0.00009012414,0.0027787948,0.3395134,0.00015011946,0.00084768375,0.0053547635,0.11573449,0.00006387133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020877825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041346986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020877825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024005782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011186219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04151261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W93866816","doi":"10.21991/c9q943","title":"THE MARKET AND THE CONSTITUTION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02203479412974821,"score_gpt":0.2583368456388308,"score_spread":0.2363020515090826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W93866816","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016520083,0.017390879,0.007243996,0.098820135,0.00089432765,0.000033665838,0.00014032905,0.00003701759,0.85891956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8508745,0.005117891,0.002187912,0.015171868,0.0033674259,0.00014380671,0.00008225285,0.00006592237,0.122988366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974745,0.0013818237,0.00004796873,0.00033959805,0.00037165926,0.00038439504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980161,0.0013477829,0.00013604597,0.00020705043,0.00015456881,0.00013841248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029807608,0.00037165338,0.00048823206,0.0011028575,0.0049328897,0.009645939,0.000730824,0.0075097997,0.01306214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006056761,0.00030291622,0.00043615143,0.0012668365,0.022482922,0.0093764495,0.0022415558,0.0060453527,0.0011413672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002953333,0.0000030217548,0.000019239977,0.0000024814642,7.610044e-7,0.0000061837045,0.00008699949,0.00003684398,0.000009507926,0.99752945,0.0018173046,0.00048527936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010391415,0.000004747185,0.00010617433,0.000020099667,0.0000019311924,0.000012266542,0.00016493667,0.00015272606,0.00003681734,0.9465812,0.0529053,0.0000033976464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008951836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006998936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01306214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054198187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005538565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043697238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W93971668","doi":"10.21991/c95376","title":"THE BURDEN OF PROOF, THE CHARTER, AND A HIERARCHY OF LEGAL NORMS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Burden of proof; Charter; Hierarchy; Law and economics; Mathematics; Law; Political science; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.022903121811051124,"score_gpt":0.25670988416969515,"score_spread":0.23380676235864403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W93971668","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033076055,0.00818884,0.35972193,0.20017722,0.002462853,0.00038649293,0.0005060972,0.00038792682,0.39509267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81653494,0.0032494133,0.13747194,0.011589639,0.0042078453,0.0009822429,0.00022803718,0.00032462834,0.025411278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9234552,0.039200846,0.005298568,0.0076282863,0.020055883,0.004361215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8814893,0.07153117,0.009139275,0.015797894,0.017096825,0.0049455785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.060747538,0.0013139222,0.0027635836,0.006639666,0.016035782,0.022777155,0.0039658532,0.013970226,0.006930589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09953883,0.0018933419,0.0016789514,0.004357613,0.09241053,0.039092626,0.008142955,0.020454343,0.0013804099],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004455408,0.0000056230774,0.00003293973,0.000008811628,0.0000019350007,0.0000073351134,0.00028024413,0.0000692269,0.000029152021,0.9978016,0.0007819567,0.0009766335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026928788,0.000009544495,0.00007480055,0.000045430483,0.000005476735,0.000021671283,0.00015489916,0.00045007694,0.00006527064,0.9905799,0.008546671,0.00001923092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015324556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009072828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060747538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012166364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022812372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3212675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W95009408","doi":"10.21991/c9gm3n","title":"Guiding the Governor General’s Prerogatives: Constitutional Convention Versus an Apolitical Decision Rule","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Governor; Rule of law; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Physics; Sociology; Politics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.10650583399817165,"score_gpt":0.2607975038834354,"score_spread":0.15429166988526377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W95009408","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062423408,0.0031797332,0.06734508,0.48864558,0.0065016146,0.0006524326,0.0003997448,0.0002586007,0.37059382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81877285,0.0010183869,0.029532338,0.09109838,0.0036852364,0.00073888025,0.00011280877,0.00025154036,0.054789457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93790495,0.025989333,0.004883307,0.008458796,0.011612524,0.011151132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94047844,0.03896049,0.0036808942,0.0038328995,0.008453512,0.0045937304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07640944,0.001031937,0.0025755824,0.0023052907,0.01473424,0.025900394,0.006433718,0.039664842,0.0094195325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11108641,0.0018454187,0.0016335937,0.0018748394,0.025920851,0.0171602,0.0065893135,0.037146762,0.002122246],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003587599,0.000058516456,0.00022570272,0.00002303136,0.000022977325,0.00006962414,0.0008496331,0.00047214827,0.0001894265,0.98207897,0.012723501,0.0032505486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028954653,0.00008675046,0.00084215164,0.00018531401,0.000060057453,0.00006586373,0.001049539,0.0031151907,0.0011873434,0.9133424,0.07956684,0.0002089832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03759132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041587293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96240866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015932865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04414407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40409654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W95515725","doi":"10.21991/c9sh4s","title":"THE QUEBEC SECESSION REFERENCE: THE CONSTITUTIONAL OBLIGATION TO NEGOTIATE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Obligation; Negotiation; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.04053616749368175,"score_gpt":0.29690324870837265,"score_spread":0.2563670812146909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W95515725","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014358973,0.016918005,0.004830355,0.24388494,0.00821693,0.0006675744,0.0056837928,0.00054207124,0.7048975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11448689,0.0054609585,0.008993879,0.09752736,0.0017309005,0.00083852804,0.0016542029,0.00051563274,0.7687916],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9824807,0.0033072864,0.0010442081,0.0014399989,0.0073742564,0.004353528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98148686,0.0053581223,0.00060914556,0.0015586698,0.009176467,0.0018108082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013325701,0.0015114516,0.001811116,0.0034436092,0.023758397,0.019151513,0.006886122,0.04325851,0.024396097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028058061,0.0022344177,0.0018623972,0.005169769,0.011286972,0.0051603774,0.0048670177,0.02991423,0.003979574],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060423703,0.00009146314,0.00077112403,0.00014187396,0.0000277451,0.00043334506,0.0033404992,0.0006094598,0.00043854228,0.43443817,0.5470074,0.012639983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000102260834,0.000026676917,0.0063216416,0.00061807776,0.000054985685,0.00014114215,0.0020390577,0.0006916451,0.00047163735,0.014729303,0.97451234,0.0002912451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9863144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9894282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.113172986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.113172986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21156146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82113135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W98224180","doi":"10.21991/c93d35","title":"SOLUTIONS TO THE FUTURE OF CANADA AND QUÉBEC AFTER THE OCTOBER 26TH REFERENDUM: GENUINE SOVEREIGNTIES WITHIN A NOVEL UNION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Political science; Political economy; Economic history; Sociology; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.024878795404882487,"score_gpt":0.22740820719699187,"score_spread":0.20252941179210937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W98224180","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09769665,0.0055586803,0.002505311,0.6632425,0.006469295,0.00018318875,0.00047351047,0.00011328633,0.22375762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7096717,0.0016354232,0.0028170666,0.10322612,0.00064980716,0.00014391949,0.00020483429,0.00010562172,0.18154551],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.984011,0.0021760685,0.00032951857,0.0015038525,0.004057369,0.007922203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99182874,0.0012382579,0.00035504744,0.00046385033,0.0031913172,0.002922739],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010996518,0.0006694819,0.0010845445,0.0009838215,0.058958746,0.022115657,0.004389247,0.024901813,0.011765817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016264036,0.00080879347,0.0014122335,0.0014412038,0.029367277,0.00552372,0.008361308,0.02476883,0.0005126203],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006503602,0.000046541867,0.001140581,0.000035013272,0.00002934519,0.00071857957,0.020281974,0.0009368438,0.00044257694,0.8603919,0.108921126,0.0069903876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009892571,0.000037250116,0.005859079,0.00020200638,0.000036269805,0.00018546397,0.036803186,0.0010143686,0.0006893287,0.06242003,0.8923756,0.00027854904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98630816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9921159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7595687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24043131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.33534628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.880992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W98459277","doi":"10.21991/c9kq1v","title":"LE DOSSIER CONSTITUTIONNEL : PERSPECTIVES DE CHANGEMENT*","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Healthcare Systems and Practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.11440887451937594,"score_gpt":0.38578084748549146,"score_spread":0.27137197296611554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W98459277","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07809349,0.023975378,0.017288467,0.34239772,0.002944446,0.00009870134,0.00027168574,0.00014903415,0.5347811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9010977,0.003598311,0.003166612,0.011492528,0.00050667673,0.00007661312,0.00007355736,0.00013062167,0.07985723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9849081,0.00737784,0.0005139888,0.0014497367,0.0032079862,0.0025422822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98593813,0.0077835293,0.00087305333,0.0015635013,0.002788984,0.0010528809],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016708016,0.00043087878,0.0006239824,0.0027883481,0.019273395,0.016780887,0.0022401433,0.007838399,0.010178662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019081274,0.00046704637,0.00055194733,0.0036777034,0.06589013,0.008283858,0.0061291037,0.010087067,0.0005341982],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008070618,0.0000075306893,0.00021126315,0.000025907111,0.0000020113414,0.000059078997,0.014881368,0.00013877945,0.0000953659,0.9750724,0.0044622268,0.0050359895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002189986,0.000030541563,0.0032753164,0.0003939634,0.000009978171,0.00011368244,0.026423085,0.00047704155,0.0005020404,0.15068278,0.8179992,0.00007050987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.642345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6513227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.642345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07762922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046931956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7195226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}