{"meta":{"query_hash":"376c58a9ce66","filters":{"venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel"},"cohort_total":556,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":556,"exported":556,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/376c58a9ce66","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Constitutional+Forum+%2F+Forum+constitutionnel"},"results":[{"id":"W100273848","doi":"10.21991/c9m377","title":"WESTERN CANADIAN NATIONALISM IN TRANSITION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nationalism; Transition (genetics); Political science; Politics; Law; Chemistry","score_opus":0.027297511568498016,"score_gpt":0.23491044764556393,"score_spread":0.2076129360770659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W100273848","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01170868,0.0013528663,0.006956146,0.0146376565,0.0037153717,0.0007714449,0.00059505395,0.00017330107,0.9600895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99562305,0.00008783175,0.0002547085,0.0024053091,0.0001752525,0.00005793541,0.00010529669,0.0000067464853,0.0012838701],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980174,0.0000953584,0.00035710642,0.00029558718,0.00040647038,0.0008281155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989078,0.00004407225,0.00007143909,0.00015990433,0.00018658269,0.00063018076],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047329682,0.00015487226,0.00018122111,0.0013872791,0.0024262597,0.00015089489,0.00026596666,0.0002378146,0.0027005149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015976428,0.0002205766,0.00012181285,0.0005757566,0.00626365,0.0010845214,0.00001901948,0.00023429272,0.0006938625],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011855416,0.00006075035,0.014965056,0.000004968913,0.000014324899,0.000042224736,0.003307382,0.000034486387,0.000006024969,0.977472,0.003602024,0.00047888045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055945636,0.000010457261,0.007845025,0.000062265084,0.000021164811,0.00004883468,0.003829171,0.000014091258,0.000006921835,0.017029688,0.9702174,0.0003555279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9088721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99549454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9839144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002597851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009547217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99887246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1015631599","doi":"10.21991/c92q16","title":"CANADA: MODÈLE D’ÉTAT MULTICULTUREL POUR LE MONDE?","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.03318494311857943,"score_gpt":0.21093391466943623,"score_spread":0.17774897155085678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1015631599","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001556314,0.037374686,0.024402589,0.10467957,0.024215188,0.0012235516,0.0037178132,0.0002574126,0.80257285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8800999,0.00090047147,0.002489021,0.0046207523,0.0006550304,0.00008506468,0.00013665835,0.000025851707,0.11098724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957253,0.00016214493,0.00080338423,0.0008302096,0.0009022986,0.0015766651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99743336,0.00011516941,0.00032659603,0.0004685051,0.0006233366,0.001033023],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034747046,0.00051076704,0.00054480665,0.0004403728,0.0063981544,0.00029616253,0.00073978264,0.00056769326,0.0036772478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032584203,0.00068189204,0.0004046752,0.00079399167,0.023964008,0.0013460303,0.0001762757,0.000656721,0.0013213685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025648467,0.00022640002,0.0004808844,0.000030795545,0.0001221157,0.00014864012,0.0005720025,0.00029938185,0.00003216658,0.67292655,0.3240924,0.0010430674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011937785,0.000029416808,0.00052398647,0.00020127266,0.0001509704,0.00022191083,0.008547644,0.00044779803,0.0000631495,0.023853486,0.9639218,0.00084481045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9931902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99768615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8785436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050485404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08020681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W10263817","doi":"10.21991/c9mh3v","title":"Can a Middle Ground be Found on Senate Numbers?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Allotment; Proportional representation; House of Commons; Representation (politics); Political science; Electoral system; Law; Public administration; Economics; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.07111907847055417,"score_gpt":0.28278464309977597,"score_spread":0.21166556462922181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W10263817","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047925163,0.0003639585,0.005039266,0.012764968,0.0040339897,0.0008374847,0.00064047996,0.00033909793,0.9280556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99075943,0.000036363916,0.00032127614,0.003995168,0.0003719121,0.00008669139,0.000030136767,0.000012283261,0.004386717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965409,0.00014737507,0.0005368144,0.00058928144,0.0008854388,0.0013002141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835056,0.00017030974,0.00021542983,0.00037906936,0.00028010033,0.0006045552],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000527034,0.00034237732,0.00036240587,0.0001330704,0.0026317877,0.0001423755,0.00048459088,0.0002875161,0.00075379456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067258824,0.0003324004,0.00026306228,0.00039242857,0.00853629,0.00062998565,0.000107894724,0.0003232408,0.0005494758],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051186824,0.00017443756,0.005377157,0.000013471139,0.00006046464,0.000054068285,0.00079651846,0.000009879996,0.000022999888,0.98865324,0.004598493,0.00018805795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012172867,0.000089737034,0.0019305765,0.00031522475,0.000048859467,0.000104721636,0.004061175,0.000037019465,0.00016514078,0.13871224,0.8525739,0.0007441259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03180047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018544838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94283426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006996577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020813958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W106135499","doi":"10.21991/c9fh4p","title":"BURYING ROTHMAN: THE SUPREME COURT AND THE RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.026490083894995447,"score_gpt":0.26767407790958886,"score_spread":0.24118399401459342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W106135499","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017564105,0.0019529762,0.08670951,0.15281673,0.004376794,0.003299295,0.00014072761,0.00036655384,0.7327733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941119,0.00019947282,0.0004990166,0.0036370482,0.0003473751,0.00017781461,0.000010995134,0.000007844024,0.0010085672],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99747324,0.00025600826,0.0004673473,0.00042409834,0.000664742,0.00071458623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984804,0.00039784296,0.00015065687,0.00038925686,0.00029685473,0.00028503666],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018414706,0.0002532787,0.000276305,0.00012318054,0.0058250586,0.00020906204,0.00052048714,0.00015435251,0.00064505945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058953924,0.00015982726,0.00018788977,0.00039453208,0.012417365,0.000480182,0.00022772978,0.0003005132,0.0001719093],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013248692,0.00004177837,0.0028517693,0.000003959815,0.00005334924,0.000009017487,0.0032156832,0.00003713529,0.000028083616,0.987137,0.0053685233,0.0011212179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001427657,0.000042727246,0.0012754662,0.00009360832,0.00008428492,0.000096184805,0.007277494,0.00022484007,0.00011588072,0.05432094,0.9347047,0.00033616816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002242738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033795612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9765478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018708437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089996675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9954692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W106867426","doi":"10.21991/c9mx0v","title":"Whose Senate Is It Anyway?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Face (sociological concept); Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.02589503799294125,"score_gpt":0.28997136201504725,"score_spread":0.264076324022106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W106867426","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022947477,0.0011714079,0.021314528,0.13525273,0.0038078767,0.0014844391,0.00047708675,0.0003713653,0.8131731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9780729,0.000106964115,0.00036993343,0.010081269,0.00044949207,0.00015970193,0.000021118443,0.000009772641,0.010728841],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99647045,0.00012248855,0.00060546055,0.0005520762,0.00089499605,0.0013545316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980715,0.00017751253,0.00019824387,0.00036981545,0.0005231154,0.00065979536],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004410937,0.00031668553,0.00036027777,0.00012340496,0.0025347085,0.000317405,0.00049973035,0.00030223525,0.0035043415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007544215,0.00030181927,0.0002632577,0.00042454485,0.008065088,0.0014559078,0.0001480912,0.00029549794,0.0057454105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005804572,0.00006615932,0.0065490534,0.000010794025,0.000037122176,0.0000100587595,0.00025217948,0.000013220877,0.00014759178,0.8733177,0.119001515,0.0005887811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062303874,0.000019882618,0.00089479325,0.0001647132,0.00002070881,0.000044774737,0.0022709006,0.0001600632,0.00022565438,0.050296646,0.9448021,0.0004767376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013838554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014816677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95512545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004552482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020560562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W107393898","doi":"10.21991/c9q66t","title":"THE SUPREME COURT AND MANDATORY RETIREMENT: SANCTIONING THE STATUS QUO","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Status quo; Supreme court; Law; Status quo bias; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.02806588880401291,"score_gpt":0.21064987380225564,"score_spread":0.18258398499824274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W107393898","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11168204,0.0104502775,0.045362078,0.027892284,0.012478803,0.003027053,0.00023137181,0.0008906402,0.78798544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951552,0.00030421984,0.00012118023,0.0033732795,0.00048574622,0.00009067481,0.000050055623,0.000013064893,0.00040654626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978065,0.000019557958,0.0004611403,0.00041154624,0.0004593036,0.00084194227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875903,0.00010270278,0.00034828344,0.00041704427,0.00031832836,0.000054599644],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047084384,0.00030072615,0.0002009102,0.000097838434,0.0041573215,0.00044796316,0.0003716537,0.00009901279,0.00034983174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024652336,0.00019707698,0.0001253503,0.00034725707,0.0051144054,0.0015686478,0.00034749322,0.00029204527,0.00031858482],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087144035,0.000036195983,0.07129131,0.000017029277,0.000056327615,0.000010486242,0.000026688214,0.000024097597,0.000047566275,0.906186,0.019777397,0.0024397478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091146026,0.000016011152,0.018799353,0.00009537974,0.00009593736,0.000050826187,0.0017045616,0.0008369129,0.0000569529,0.041936725,0.9351282,0.00036764354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00067212846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011967889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91535085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000117978365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040874313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W107858588","doi":"10.21991/c90m39","title":"Canada’s Neglected Tradition of Coalition Government","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Governor; Government (linguistics); Fell; Politics; Government Office; Public administration; Political science; Core (optical fiber); Law; Local government; Computer science; Philosophy; Engineering; Geography","score_opus":0.021413804817183312,"score_gpt":0.20469795115256062,"score_spread":0.18328414633537732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W107858588","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006154161,0.0005483854,0.015864987,0.0043897727,0.0034747217,0.0006602527,0.0022769265,0.00012249606,0.96650827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968874,0.00007168781,0.0003591846,0.0006497114,0.000104439554,0.00003183523,0.00008528422,0.000005357654,0.0018051205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978818,0.00009123834,0.00043340353,0.00027542646,0.0008643759,0.0004537168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998984,0.00006545526,0.00021146337,0.00019792125,0.0002527678,0.0002884299],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018629227,0.00014649244,0.0002191821,0.0001962976,0.0020040027,0.00006238687,0.00025243644,0.0001455497,0.0023484356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030338494,0.00019632478,0.00012689701,0.00033651333,0.0068856175,0.0005051477,0.000031254625,0.0001552317,0.000052186853],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000353724,0.00008183511,0.0011547074,0.000012163489,0.00003728396,0.000017121209,0.00035285484,0.000012419944,0.00013620104,0.937085,0.060622897,0.00045217297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005901868,0.00003650222,0.002994863,0.00008454673,0.00005530817,0.000028508228,0.0039226017,0.000023997696,0.00023904306,0.009278585,0.98244214,0.0003037177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9637764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.994419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9907332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030134108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021559227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99929523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W108103023","doi":"10.21991/c9166m","title":"THE ISRAELI CONSTITUTIONAL REVOLUTION: THE CANADIAN IMPACT IN THE MIDST OF A FORMATIVE PERIOD","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Formative assessment; Period (music); Political science; Economic history; Law; History; Sociology; Philosophy; Pedagogy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.0424974356862031,"score_gpt":0.2877173947549372,"score_spread":0.2452199590687341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W108103023","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016146071,0.016597165,0.00818624,0.03843676,0.0038991724,0.0029938084,0.0010866215,0.00011124118,0.91254294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99797994,0.00022160406,0.00010700999,0.0010638862,0.00018368442,0.0001885867,0.000033842058,0.0000049263017,0.00021652387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964551,0.00042078624,0.0007265448,0.000330408,0.00090833276,0.0011588807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978181,0.0005138053,0.00029660558,0.00046445525,0.00065867306,0.0002483777],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021541915,0.00032291765,0.00031970732,0.00021104842,0.009800173,0.00018806983,0.0011294538,0.0001995217,0.0001170691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011262692,0.00017756507,0.0003480437,0.000874667,0.04492684,0.00072587916,0.00013691107,0.00050792936,0.00013928807],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048293856,0.000063517684,0.08429789,0.000005100476,0.000095544325,0.000015153083,0.0044093933,0.00003688262,0.0000020785917,0.9068751,0.0032766475,0.0008744125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021350207,0.00019805376,0.059011456,0.00034124195,0.00016404847,0.0006144644,0.23261783,0.00018025345,0.000025441612,0.15797341,0.5458566,0.0008821918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09056893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9818339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079296966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009034779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99658304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W10830698","doi":"10.21991/c9bh3c","title":"DISABLING IMAGES AND THE DANGERS OF PUBLIC PERCEPTION: A COMMENTARY ON THE MEDIA’S \"COVERAGE\" OF THE LATIMER CASE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Media coverage; Computer science; Psychology; Media studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.04566106157659506,"score_gpt":0.26435581410797127,"score_spread":0.2186947525313762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W10830698","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14642212,0.0028043292,0.006420445,0.35287404,0.0039253104,0.0030245988,0.0012055284,0.00013292431,0.48319072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99477285,0.0003636238,0.00015030449,0.0043852325,0.00013393293,0.000045889337,0.000012570402,0.0000039683096,0.00013164322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816585,0.00040580533,0.00035944782,0.00021222848,0.0005166401,0.00034003667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99833435,0.0007688878,0.00023779775,0.0003234225,0.0002467365,0.000088788984],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011911825,0.00016963888,0.0002179064,0.000017960368,0.0031771583,0.000056857203,0.0004449538,0.00013575207,0.0005153229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00072359777,0.00008460706,0.00026424314,0.00033913323,0.031603508,0.00038658534,0.00018068153,0.0002997931,0.000008795318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003847685,0.00007445256,0.009212831,0.000008227491,0.00008849628,0.000005417132,0.007863196,0.000019245785,0.00002224972,0.96941036,0.01273633,0.0005207219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0063549443,0.00010733707,0.005008978,0.00058023,0.0006022412,0.0007170652,0.4489727,0.00026450618,0.00065115734,0.24771781,0.2880762,0.0009468379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000926844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010585319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8483507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000088174886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045657004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99812055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W108443798","doi":"10.21991/c9jd4k","title":"THE SUPREME COURT ENTRENCHES PARLIAMENTARY PRIVILEGE OUT OF THE CHARTER'S REACH: DONOHOE V. CBC","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Privilege (computing); Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04460770952854883,"score_gpt":0.2600284529136868,"score_spread":0.21542074338513797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W108443798","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030163795,0.006869382,0.010240151,0.054416385,0.019110423,0.003160054,0.0013836005,0.0004292611,0.8742269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971846,0.00074302667,0.00017255831,0.00090909295,0.00038201548,0.00013819158,0.000027302227,0.00000819472,0.0004350575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964115,0.00024866968,0.000795418,0.000484085,0.001077335,0.0009829766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795145,0.00037999928,0.0004068182,0.0005232854,0.00051009445,0.00022836411],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075426954,0.00036633687,0.0003898799,0.000094405405,0.006800574,0.000090730784,0.001105797,0.0002018822,0.00036402265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063312624,0.0002427212,0.00044423126,0.00042546174,0.028695226,0.00057438965,0.0004140242,0.00036581815,0.00017619539],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005992404,0.00014964181,0.08567596,0.00000557453,0.00018484025,0.000005692513,0.0011784463,0.000008596375,0.00008274239,0.9025464,0.008827039,0.001275135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010653738,0.00007459645,0.013426609,0.0002745217,0.00020863664,0.000038174723,0.031141007,0.000026631347,0.0007810997,0.18609637,0.7662222,0.00064481597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036717514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019189859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96702075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032972675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025933767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99870735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W109278735","doi":"10.21991/c9z079","title":"COULD THE MEECH LAKE ACCORD AFFECT THE PROTECTION OF EQUALITY RIGHTS FOR WOMEN AND MINORITIES IN CANADA?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Political science; Gender equality; Environmental protection; Public administration; Socioeconomics; Environmental planning; Geography; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.056049261806597354,"score_gpt":0.28504674326278334,"score_spread":0.22899748145618598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W109278735","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86657,0.0020441692,0.0074710227,0.025794504,0.003540964,0.007898439,0.0011063671,0.00013967227,0.08543489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998463,0.000046182326,0.00013434517,0.00026574844,0.00008795926,0.0006886428,0.000008614254,0.0000033999206,0.00030216234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979683,0.00021694398,0.00043331838,0.00028212738,0.00047104523,0.0006282304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986981,0.0004961463,0.00021054759,0.0001746237,0.00032037092,0.00010020706],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010853509,0.00020475648,0.00029477026,0.00004908593,0.0030838214,0.000046963094,0.0003344098,0.000117307245,0.000079456324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006589302,0.00012318621,0.000092946684,0.00027014548,0.0076069226,0.00036048607,0.00011324995,0.00022206987,0.0000027355595],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008725301,0.00003646681,0.033160184,0.000031012838,0.00006518021,0.0000013816557,0.004846591,0.000020823427,0.000020663589,0.96035737,0.00075619837,0.00061690353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030879874,0.00019991683,0.090611786,0.00026262362,0.00011511741,0.000040191953,0.184761,0.0002983668,0.00074255007,0.18874124,0.5301179,0.0010212725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6902221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9779532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7716161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008102708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023515979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W110045794","doi":"10.21991/c9095z","title":"THE LEGACY OF THE REFERENDUM: WHO ARE WE NOW?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.056520600191823304,"score_gpt":0.28132576366818035,"score_spread":0.22480516347635704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W110045794","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0066847596,0.0031489735,0.0063975453,0.048178334,0.005615024,0.0009907116,0.00041903497,0.00013309448,0.9284325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99347836,0.00051650713,0.00007671974,0.000562071,0.00021035431,0.000050772425,0.0000025253798,0.000005913399,0.0050967764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973962,0.00019379104,0.00054970663,0.0003023465,0.00074995676,0.0008080471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982554,0.00027530745,0.000400009,0.000489299,0.00036642756,0.00021359845],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060686877,0.00020955439,0.00028700815,0.00004276119,0.003759537,0.00010147187,0.00089431164,0.0001863245,0.00015272074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007132343,0.0001284549,0.00028169417,0.0003958387,0.014529124,0.0005743553,0.0002113707,0.0002864739,0.00011329174],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021871085,0.0000518233,0.020598492,0.000009640656,0.000038413134,0.0000028425247,0.0002500282,0.000006378412,0.000013599571,0.96129495,0.01731717,0.00039478383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003641815,0.000015780206,0.007799107,0.00030826268,0.000027697784,0.000018253022,0.0029969094,0.000016003072,0.00022450041,0.06795092,0.92006975,0.00020860582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037475694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011047159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9867936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002320272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001861077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99753743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W112197869","doi":"10.21991/c9xt0m","title":"THOUGHTS ON CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS RECOGNIZING AN INHERENT ABORIGINAL RIGHT TO SELF-GOVERNMENT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Constitutional right; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Psychology; Sociology; Linguistics; Constitution; Philosophy","score_opus":0.044421854086359736,"score_gpt":0.30768330344413425,"score_spread":0.2632614493577745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W112197869","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030151399,0.00051378476,0.06252341,0.005589948,0.009504726,0.0026924706,0.0011606085,0.0010616118,0.886802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883229,0.0002142561,0.005671703,0.0035730123,0.0013937864,0.00029903342,0.00009589107,0.000017400618,0.0004119898],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935611,0.0002850933,0.0009629021,0.0012312435,0.0023496998,0.0016099549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971803,0.00021152779,0.00031732983,0.00049873063,0.0006621092,0.0011300114],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008859988,0.0007116866,0.0006189946,0.0003254163,0.0063689277,0.00021418904,0.0008586349,0.0003406339,0.0011171149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035922002,0.0006900739,0.00033110837,0.00084835576,0.011915265,0.0013536786,0.00020900603,0.000517902,0.001524814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030416207,0.0010970051,0.011686083,0.000007999814,0.0002378178,0.00011329609,0.0012923277,0.00011472058,0.000115534036,0.98019993,0.0037169044,0.0011142107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001816921,0.0004660616,0.0015137399,0.00035698953,0.00017268359,0.00010537084,0.005952008,0.00003658152,0.0014114477,0.09018964,0.896601,0.0013775429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010587543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022560344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95817155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018314029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040033446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1134862121","doi":"10.21991/c9mq15","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada Long-Gun Registry Decision: The Constitutional Question Behind an Intergovernmental Relations Failure","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Institutions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Repeal; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Government (linguistics); Gun control; Parliament; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.014586215470886782,"score_gpt":0.22430315767289707,"score_spread":0.2097169422020103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1134862121","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08117271,0.0038322846,0.42898494,0.09584645,0.028340433,0.004713153,0.0020804105,0.00067525293,0.35435435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958987,0.000010487653,0.00039188517,0.0013983285,0.0010316019,0.00011778396,0.00041270882,0.000015036996,0.0007234438],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99569714,0.00007112456,0.001176885,0.000586812,0.0016813924,0.00078664947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99666727,0.00031514352,0.0007243296,0.0008338255,0.0012887254,0.00017070638],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012325213,0.00047653745,0.0004025166,0.00016192137,0.0042827413,0.0005722816,0.0010311342,0.00023267412,0.0002092304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015487963,0.00032765447,0.00024002025,0.00055148115,0.010119004,0.003027338,0.0004164865,0.00055021234,0.00015072024],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011519508,0.0001096125,0.02909842,0.000015026139,0.000089687775,0.000022961802,0.000018473225,0.0055832984,0.000029022794,0.835511,0.12918769,0.0002195752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001821918,0.000040818864,0.0030185194,0.00031289647,0.00014543069,0.00051170326,0.00346181,0.00538337,0.00004047417,0.02449491,0.9601765,0.0005916165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04214449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3880823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.914726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010566023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006999718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W113985439","doi":"10.21991/c9j37m","title":"THE TRICKSTER: INTEGRAL TO A DISTINCTIVE CULTURE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Museums and Cultural Heritage","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trickster; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.04329065382207777,"score_gpt":0.22762542314450485,"score_spread":0.18433476932242707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W113985439","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0057524093,0.0008237906,0.010394777,0.0039243298,0.004890344,0.0010227595,0.0005907606,0.00027619666,0.9723246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98406535,0.000026250216,0.00038722038,0.0018166119,0.0004203397,0.00020532541,0.00005483055,0.00001121781,0.013012831],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795204,0.000047723628,0.0004878717,0.00043548498,0.00035693738,0.00071991945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871707,0.00007391728,0.0001296925,0.0003437579,0.0004576612,0.0002778944],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018073575,0.00036410146,0.00026809613,0.00009124154,0.0037643756,0.00033426462,0.0005091971,0.00010022751,0.0023934003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015683455,0.00021892235,0.00027302234,0.00014166182,0.0055238055,0.00061579683,0.0001859816,0.00031598035,0.0014149924],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013130394,0.00008511813,0.0005221072,0.000006264533,0.000078851626,0.00001585345,0.0046042665,0.000002856257,0.000028025739,0.9652567,0.027316125,0.0019525373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052184,0.00015028348,0.00019067626,0.00007624848,0.000043355074,0.00007964579,0.022543268,0.0000327228,0.00008917095,0.036774814,0.9390855,0.0004124842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024152987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021349825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97831297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014433592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031350067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W114007849","doi":"10.21991/c90h2w","title":"NAFTA AND THE CONSTITUTION: DOES LABOUR CONVENTIONS REALLY MATTER ANY MORE?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Business; Labour economics; Economics","score_opus":0.016465284319378486,"score_gpt":0.2596079918824726,"score_spread":0.24314270756309408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W114007849","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053233426,0.0024473679,0.034239896,0.08719888,0.0072608762,0.0030411729,0.0014700379,0.0005693411,0.810539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98756665,0.0005044632,0.0010945534,0.005904543,0.00022055185,0.00019247788,0.00006194815,0.000010351825,0.004444458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996891,0.00025655574,0.0006721653,0.00058801763,0.0006530779,0.0009391862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980768,0.00023066842,0.00026216378,0.000493947,0.000548827,0.00038758232],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010171268,0.00036800205,0.00039739872,0.00016285169,0.0056302855,0.00025580145,0.00056384946,0.00025136466,0.0034656578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027996863,0.0002464157,0.0002468689,0.0005125701,0.03488504,0.0010284461,0.00026190447,0.0003688338,0.00017866977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010076866,0.00013307865,0.033294685,0.000010524468,0.00016583761,0.000024174047,0.00095921,0.000008294663,0.000015551592,0.9614605,0.0036017604,0.00022564206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004763919,0.000033751527,0.034841046,0.00022210662,0.00023165447,0.00013921164,0.016997179,0.000043039006,0.00007047785,0.17010409,0.77182454,0.00072897796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005313565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003595852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9343332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018222134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017393195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W114225910","doi":"10.21991/c94t0g","title":"THE ARBOUR RECORD","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Maritime and Coastal Archaeology","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geology","score_opus":0.03772589759735826,"score_gpt":0.2110348782756737,"score_spread":0.17330898067831543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W114225910","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025929748,0.00065174594,0.009113146,0.005611442,0.0046703857,0.0004143353,0.00016242932,0.00025448317,0.97652906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855305,0.00009334956,0.00045611826,0.0017827773,0.00041460642,0.00012568907,0.000045320783,0.000010968602,0.011540664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980201,0.00006354798,0.00050003524,0.00037157917,0.0002789278,0.00076577987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882627,0.00017110542,0.00014585523,0.0003844184,0.0003003593,0.00017202551],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024931284,0.00028065007,0.00023200698,0.00012055926,0.0036173258,0.00012994408,0.0004934894,0.00009171125,0.004754295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014583414,0.00020298858,0.00022143927,0.00007741373,0.016067596,0.00048372752,0.00029763544,0.00029995994,0.0013399535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089943365,0.00007419347,0.002477203,0.0000060310745,0.000076056844,0.000026139516,0.00067217654,0.0000019425602,0.000009576843,0.97549665,0.012785307,0.008284768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037258473,0.000075069736,0.00009979963,0.000024964958,0.000025913345,0.00010333622,0.003001727,0.0000643534,0.000058022557,0.24692948,0.74899435,0.00025040872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006275659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049792733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9829375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000061440485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005334959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99943763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W115428265","doi":"10.21991/c9sq23","title":"THE MEECH LAKE ACCORD AND THE FUTURE OF THE WELFARE STATE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Historical Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Welfare; Welfare state; Environmental science; Environmental planning; Political science; Computer science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.019807050017502294,"score_gpt":0.19003900365505405,"score_spread":0.17023195363755175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W115428265","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02526236,0.07089607,0.018699674,0.116750464,0.01585653,0.0025945147,0.0026960268,0.00016145133,0.7470829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99683565,0.0012958203,0.000084858846,0.00067041407,0.00011528394,0.00007387965,0.0000057718535,0.0000070699334,0.0009112363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844587,0.00004145998,0.0007258592,0.00030753366,0.000079723686,0.00039957656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988417,0.00015508493,0.0004510814,0.00037383157,0.000104308325,0.000073998024],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061160146,0.00020575558,0.00040306812,0.00004896487,0.003308582,0.00005175596,0.0005184064,0.00011042452,0.0001479324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024623403,0.00011971788,0.00027253953,0.00022074305,0.010057657,0.00021504484,0.0002882988,0.00026056197,0.00007229779],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006977866,0.000026291926,0.020480277,0.0000064931896,0.00011269235,7.3417834e-7,0.0003566641,0.000015698426,2.571787e-7,0.975131,0.0024190664,0.001381084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010390203,0.000015196354,0.007426295,0.000013711985,0.000018492288,0.000015632342,0.0016759561,0.000088035245,0.000004752858,0.26232147,0.7272064,0.00017504656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002956618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017866666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9715733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011486336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016779483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W11616365","doi":"10.21991/c9s084","title":"FURTHER RESTRICTINGS ON ACCESS TO CHARTER REVIEW: A COMMENT ON HY AND ZEL'S INC. V. ONTARIO (A.G.)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.06074538259970911,"score_gpt":0.3081228134511146,"score_spread":0.24737743085140548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W11616365","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011906343,0.0018708912,0.0024951636,0.12952685,0.0029819815,0.0030298245,0.00012528211,0.00029754496,0.8477661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9445799,0.0004202,0.00014166492,0.053680018,0.00022921631,0.00019591945,0.000023213457,0.000010828636,0.00071904156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972954,0.000119330034,0.00054367876,0.0005988264,0.0007130171,0.0007297946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985403,0.00014616949,0.0002145971,0.0003014757,0.00033247637,0.0004650164],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006713526,0.0003289006,0.00041787527,0.00021905627,0.002006313,0.0001993074,0.00048442572,0.00018201792,0.00074851536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005089637,0.0002939474,0.00011644189,0.00042467442,0.0022247578,0.00077774335,0.00019716012,0.00034864037,0.00043134968],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009853702,0.00016729573,0.018533124,0.000047483718,0.000039860613,0.000019619101,0.0015443414,0.0000062762374,0.0000043073014,0.90569437,0.072540745,0.0013040503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005882153,0.00022203993,0.002290407,0.0015383023,0.000043067175,0.000020132744,0.00085525325,0.0000025242962,0.000051165713,0.0072125643,0.98674154,0.00043477857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05091535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046675187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9326736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000528566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016287849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W116455860","doi":"10.21991/c98h3r","title":"THE CHARTER’S BURDENS: THE RETURN TO THE \"PRESUMPTION OF VALIDITY\" IN SECTION 7 OF THE CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Presumption; Political science; Section (typography); Law; Law and economics; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.04946066497352069,"score_gpt":0.2699278153999215,"score_spread":0.2204671504264008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W116455860","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8386536,0.0018435221,0.0009594892,0.07793506,0.0067087323,0.0044626915,0.00055869244,0.000052843487,0.06882535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992442,0.00007432279,0.000039511204,0.0002206028,0.00014504022,0.00007182183,0.000004184422,0.0000030477463,0.00019726463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979958,0.00029133455,0.0005073893,0.00022060522,0.00054232695,0.00044255302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856347,0.00030277116,0.00028438418,0.0003134125,0.0004311297,0.00010481813],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011465459,0.00016776306,0.00022670004,0.000074739,0.0038577185,0.000044054617,0.0005610923,0.00014724056,0.00005110307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005940142,0.00007828973,0.0001498368,0.00040571057,0.011821308,0.0002441402,0.000141149,0.00025732737,0.0000074039326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035689267,0.000028450484,0.033579964,0.0000086044465,0.000055541987,6.2925034e-7,0.010125335,0.000049768707,0.0001641155,0.9533364,0.0024031415,0.00021235623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021137549,0.00022669327,0.38609973,0.0007927556,0.00027071187,0.00005763908,0.062653944,0.00043492139,0.0033313215,0.0839191,0.4592931,0.0008063463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2575435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7957008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8694173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026806176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006975234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99743915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W118142628","doi":"10.21991/c99q2r","title":"ROCKET V. ROYAL COLLEGE OF DENTAL SURGEONS OF ONTARIO: PROFESSIONAL ADVERTISING AND THE LIMITS OF REGULATION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Rocket (weapon); Aeronautics; Medicine; Political science; Advertising; Medical education; Engineering; Business","score_opus":0.04837147989743538,"score_gpt":0.3362318202368766,"score_spread":0.2878603403394412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W118142628","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9241641,0.00058524666,0.005990389,0.0036684615,0.0024773623,0.0020676153,0.00077543495,0.000047754413,0.060223635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99712014,0.000019904835,0.0011351575,0.00023509057,0.000040985367,0.000074441465,0.00005754178,0.0000068563454,0.0013098766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967812,0.00043370615,0.001427378,0.0003047243,0.00060605974,0.000446957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99633104,0.0016119416,0.0008834418,0.00034293113,0.0006662499,0.00016441775],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013672049,0.00022255062,0.00063816604,0.00016256976,0.0008978387,0.0000023552846,0.00023413771,0.00029335773,0.0018522694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001921704,0.0001593949,0.00018716522,0.00024474284,0.00781688,0.0003373205,0.00021732762,0.000516138,0.000016535556],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009094383,0.00020398035,0.3057015,0.00017492754,0.00008204628,0.0000023392572,0.0012296205,0.000013432614,0.00015731736,0.68971455,0.0016625264,0.00014831733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.027033228,0.0007004836,0.6236045,0.007663447,0.0011710813,0.00023497715,0.06593553,0.001617098,0.008287237,0.15465915,0.10779812,0.0012951461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009677149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013076531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5350554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017984303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004581156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99906015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1203575969","doi":"10.21991/c97h56","title":"Analysis of Reference re Supreme Court Act: The Implied Currency Requirement for Quebec Seat Appointees to the Supreme Court","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Original jurisdiction; Certiorari; Remand (court procedure); Sociology","score_opus":0.06428803097656172,"score_gpt":0.294797804616469,"score_spread":0.23050977363990727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1203575969","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037300557,0.0023607933,0.44773278,0.20026757,0.008074783,0.008403294,0.0020793937,0.0008434385,0.2929374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929454,0.000010827551,0.00034041304,0.004206483,0.00047624504,0.00028095368,0.00072988775,0.000014647108,0.0009951864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99684215,0.000041002168,0.0009150439,0.00059195614,0.0009043654,0.00070551527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966913,0.00022658943,0.00058672356,0.00075480895,0.0016408293,0.00009976517],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012093592,0.00041886955,0.0005689695,0.00057026075,0.0012314991,0.00042002127,0.00094816874,0.00014472818,0.00055038347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011749541,0.0002766663,0.0003995123,0.0015334906,0.001943471,0.0012671894,0.0003986073,0.00025042475,0.00034895958],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017008877,0.000112664355,0.015743285,0.000036814425,0.00040164537,0.0000015439251,0.00014409696,0.004894329,0.0001061748,0.87583023,0.10177577,0.00078332133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011637834,0.000036486155,0.0028246131,0.00012047258,0.0009634803,0.0000057916345,0.0046192072,0.0073669693,0.00011021229,0.0057684253,0.97656554,0.0004550438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00463225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02174628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9556448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002527328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00096583983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W12331922","doi":"10.21991/c9b67s","title":"LE RÉGIME TRUDEAU A-T-IL TRAHI LE RÉGIME DE 1867?","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.02312149742344567,"score_gpt":0.22436524608431274,"score_spread":0.20124374866086708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W12331922","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003553447,0.01676576,0.03990264,0.040712334,0.012749312,0.0009428622,0.0019331337,0.00038630306,0.8830542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9395027,0.0011472753,0.0021520588,0.0028462426,0.00090256165,0.00011863337,0.0001407299,0.00003874414,0.053151023],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99450356,0.00035987695,0.0010236953,0.0010258978,0.0008605531,0.0022264137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970194,0.00017592969,0.00040790706,0.00063385995,0.00047009473,0.0012927714],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010039436,0.00059930043,0.00070735917,0.00091980817,0.008733933,0.0005235964,0.0010278776,0.0008865527,0.005096808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048319908,0.0008846087,0.00075672386,0.0011657547,0.046906546,0.0023303255,0.00021421482,0.0008399982,0.0034301272],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007496726,0.0005861499,0.0012240686,0.00005938325,0.00020736884,0.00020563036,0.0018893926,0.00012863637,0.00013426726,0.91688067,0.0756868,0.0029226646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015636679,0.00008278546,0.00045297868,0.0002481641,0.00018633794,0.0004420851,0.005526741,0.00014037445,0.00014500467,0.10497828,0.88527435,0.0009592517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37693548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4739806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93594927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00288453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046928372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99936044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W125281486","doi":"10.21991/c9zq0w","title":"TREATY INDIGENOUS PEOPLES AND THE CHARLOTTETOWN ACCORD: THE MESSAGE IN THE BREEZE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Treaty; Political science; Geography; Law; Meteorology; Biology","score_opus":0.019949696067637714,"score_gpt":0.2271148590867824,"score_spread":0.20716516301914467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W125281486","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09135,0.011978687,0.0026190304,0.07104328,0.0033127433,0.0037045786,0.0004706315,0.00020292294,0.8153181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942169,0.0010518125,0.000033785596,0.0029088748,0.00016745992,0.0001822453,0.000014311284,0.0000055176383,0.0014190751],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977495,0.0003917605,0.0003687555,0.00032129316,0.000517717,0.0006509432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985968,0.0006273384,0.00014672228,0.00039025635,0.000109144275,0.00012976486],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016435855,0.00019607438,0.00023779314,0.0002606236,0.008037215,0.0004692763,0.00084500614,0.00015067343,0.00046793834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058544124,0.0001241636,0.00017181411,0.0005353391,0.029991414,0.0005328014,0.000110583605,0.0003903932,0.00011525746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005863027,0.000054560755,0.007239533,0.000005329316,0.000031230997,0.000023382674,0.025339445,0.00000519585,0.0000016462727,0.9608637,0.0051186234,0.0012587123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002010007,0.000029475887,0.016935248,0.000063906075,0.000108795444,0.00021969446,0.07859462,0.000016291166,0.0000031974296,0.0460842,0.855573,0.00036154996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1893273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.77628976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9147795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003847404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037905916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9932542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W128508422","doi":"10.21991/c9tt0p","title":"UNSTABLE FOUNDING: PQ ASSUMPTIONS AND THE INDEPENDENCE PROJECT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Mathematical economics; Political science; Economics; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.2382538064546714,"score_gpt":0.39231243156712975,"score_spread":0.15405862511245835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W128508422","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019428816,0.0017041377,0.7476508,0.0054535214,0.007315242,0.0025145626,0.0003981348,0.00036823598,0.21516652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876218,0.000066421024,0.009298433,0.0012926561,0.00016154116,0.00019748019,0.00001906513,0.000015137237,0.0013274692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931879,0.00048154945,0.0015931751,0.0012326587,0.0025092303,0.0009954791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940363,0.0025091548,0.0006037531,0.0012713057,0.0012793435,0.00030010415],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053315763,0.0005005548,0.00069391093,0.0008507122,0.0031772538,0.0008828504,0.0016262303,0.00030599997,0.0013965403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009776655,0.0003265133,0.00035735083,0.0014247175,0.014181815,0.002095456,0.00096921215,0.0006283837,0.00096906244],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027295205,0.00009097055,0.020341583,0.0000047485273,0.000057849462,0.000033605847,0.00035813364,0.000094243034,0.000079011086,0.9678494,0.008013334,0.0028041697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006732325,0.00008751446,0.006258801,0.00020739422,0.0001327189,0.002072339,0.0072474587,0.010673022,0.00022820165,0.66380996,0.30153003,0.0010202221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030788145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030550643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.968193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017999555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001730027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W131250926","doi":"10.21991/c94h3h","title":"Charter Rights and Public Policy Choices: The Supreme Court and Public Finance","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Appeal; Supreme court; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Political science; Health care; Public policy; Law","score_opus":0.03605101082084554,"score_gpt":0.2613519510641108,"score_spread":0.22530094024326525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W131250926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09828414,0.0069883415,0.00869455,0.35343,0.0026196896,0.0022369605,0.0023622918,0.00039393187,0.5249901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903728,0.00045793832,0.00018413,0.006601776,0.00043035054,0.000081829676,0.000017931734,0.0000071656355,0.0018461163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997439,0.00012090421,0.0003675098,0.0004907992,0.00046489257,0.0011168732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853957,0.00018337597,0.0001933106,0.00033680088,0.00025734084,0.000489576],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004611888,0.00027774935,0.00025612384,0.00023047898,0.004382571,0.0003342057,0.00046785042,0.0002124701,0.00025791468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007065815,0.00022724242,0.00010167002,0.00053810765,0.017017724,0.0015196762,0.00015523985,0.00028364666,0.00008586211],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011661441,0.00004673474,0.015228618,0.000006530198,0.000037183603,0.000009871269,0.0006957075,6.784168e-7,0.000004901912,0.96663165,0.016294556,0.0010318815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059746206,0.000024740759,0.005759329,0.00004495328,0.000018910714,0.00012884624,0.00088363816,0.000051792107,0.000011619012,0.10265966,0.889501,0.00031805917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05429184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1056378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89208865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002478674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034087335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W131980456","doi":"10.21991/c9s09h","title":"Constitutional Change to Address Climate Change and Nonrenewable Energy Use","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kyoto Protocol; Climate change; Greenhouse gas; Per capita; Politics; Natural resource economics; Political science; Sign (mathematics); Economy; Political economy; Economics; Law; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.23752094771088336,"score_gpt":0.26082706898147345,"score_spread":0.02330612127059009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W131980456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07453284,0.020223532,0.18145125,0.022823958,0.01848979,0.006433282,0.052353945,0.0015387265,0.6221527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98380023,0.0017896624,0.0024813467,0.009948296,0.00053606776,0.00087742944,0.00036892665,0.000026253818,0.00017176714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99626654,0.000027663042,0.0011075806,0.0010987169,0.00011652343,0.001382969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998086,0.00012112186,0.00041056718,0.00056378817,0.00015475962,0.0006638062],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044105228,0.0005735374,0.00077684975,0.00058183976,0.0011926946,0.00022524319,0.00041481832,0.00035122153,0.0011065895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024577443,0.00069296214,0.00024641695,0.0004330161,0.0043930043,0.002356798,0.00054104446,0.0002304409,0.0011417595],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011003308,0.0001620065,0.091316335,0.000034510926,0.00008012405,0.000027280417,0.00035879022,0.000018093775,0.0000110818,0.9060221,0.0012063122,0.00065334927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035146952,0.00029338707,0.018437881,0.00043077875,0.00008277842,0.0008252965,0.0009665803,0.0016348468,0.00032389592,0.12575524,0.8451363,0.002598331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028994444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001146248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9092674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030789367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000136522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W132384125","doi":"10.21991/c9dw92","title":"UNDERSTANDING LAW AND RELIGION AS CULTURE: MAKING ROOM FOR MEANING IN THE PUBLIC SPHERE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Salient; Meaning (existential); Politics; Sociology; Public sphere; Institution; Law; Public space; Political science; Social science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.12048597295882865,"score_gpt":0.3147839888293185,"score_spread":0.19429801587048987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W132384125","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004706388,0.0008102899,0.13024007,0.0072276243,0.00090174004,0.0009039955,0.000112064576,0.000121431316,0.85921216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98971754,0.00013361337,0.002776602,0.006779967,0.0002130794,0.00012311683,0.000047374586,0.000009457195,0.0001992452],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99737626,0.0001890005,0.0004786731,0.0004624185,0.00055049954,0.00094314595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987015,0.00044075452,0.00018958068,0.00023313377,0.0002312659,0.00020372654],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009633155,0.00028461963,0.0002814307,0.00014179923,0.0041759755,0.0002502075,0.00044752588,0.00023531169,0.0001177473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007226557,0.00024284278,0.0001626831,0.00044439462,0.01098369,0.0009429748,0.00009770053,0.000315569,0.000032062937],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046003817,0.000067984955,0.0043323296,0.00001367545,0.00003593575,0.000025740894,0.0016540114,0.000018105655,0.000006706279,0.99161047,0.0021062694,0.000082745384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006110125,0.00005782682,0.000027393964,0.000119655284,0.000039843926,0.00018157628,0.022624383,0.000049175593,0.0000074972827,0.4023796,0.5735866,0.000315462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014614966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008880429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9892469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052586204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031546326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99712044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W134432849","doi":"10.21991/c9xh3n","title":"COVENANT CONSTITUTIONALISM AND THE CANADA ASSISTANCE PLAN","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Constitutionalism; Plan (archaeology); Political science; Public administration; Law; Geography; Politics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.05098320338001189,"score_gpt":0.26579905349256344,"score_spread":0.21481585011255155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W134432849","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020721983,0.0018869492,0.019601846,0.06296402,0.0033554595,0.00085235975,0.0007001366,0.00017222043,0.9083948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907236,0.00017167028,0.00039541034,0.007947936,0.00025530913,0.000074303956,0.0000367401,0.0000062072268,0.00038879787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970063,0.00027829036,0.0005190816,0.00044091642,0.00083755574,0.0009178765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978787,0.00081880135,0.00016527432,0.0003084162,0.00035462686,0.0004742216],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010582361,0.00028552083,0.00034987606,0.00007764428,0.0045892806,0.000103306644,0.00047852495,0.00023372444,0.0003683011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016545139,0.00021736784,0.00013673164,0.0002832532,0.0441516,0.000504293,0.0001470469,0.0005048943,0.000051644784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014812413,0.000043249245,0.0037524523,0.000009934361,0.00006653619,0.00004196328,0.00048489566,0.000014359498,0.0000024190952,0.9898943,0.0054410757,0.00010070383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017638021,0.000013652415,0.0007881611,0.000086556174,0.00006506677,0.00012676061,0.0037967153,0.000062184045,0.000030532214,0.5758902,0.41699228,0.00038410813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26077163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36884826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98865145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004208953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010297527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W13683040","doi":"10.21991/c9k389","title":"Reflections on the Kitchen Accord","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Negotiation; Maturity (psychological); Political science; Point (geometry); Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.07221261619120004,"score_gpt":0.364798395714988,"score_spread":0.29258577952378795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W13683040","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022994964,0.00053158443,0.025828792,0.043501608,0.0040905005,0.00066832465,0.000246919,0.00032337505,0.9225094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9828638,0.0000885195,0.0006634155,0.011121723,0.0013736738,0.00016670399,0.00005762751,0.000012338022,0.003652213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964336,0.00030145427,0.00049273256,0.00037631765,0.0009110516,0.0014848016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99735016,0.0010307821,0.00019807146,0.00047155857,0.0003608366,0.000588611],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010005158,0.00034813065,0.0002836535,0.00019891332,0.006995876,0.00016207428,0.0005905881,0.00023891199,0.0016165922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015354247,0.00027751108,0.00030003852,0.00070373237,0.017254906,0.0009083604,0.00013241795,0.0005373507,0.0016380519],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027577147,0.0001713764,0.0074658124,0.0000027764443,0.00006883722,0.0000035842982,0.00027123166,0.000090064525,0.000039396706,0.9671496,0.02435106,0.00035864016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028462862,0.000032210977,0.00036875956,0.00004752661,0.00005226356,0.0000687045,0.007008253,0.0000076931965,0.000068579,0.016923122,0.9747485,0.0003897618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007712644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004641895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9805643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061934214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053124097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W138050343","doi":"10.21991/c94x0h","title":"THE WITHERING OF THE STATE?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Indian History and Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Political science; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.03742378643544827,"score_gpt":0.19267902631207995,"score_spread":0.15525523987663167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W138050343","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026919117,0.001508276,0.0022590526,0.0019088782,0.008151426,0.00071049726,0.00045069755,0.00012483483,0.9579672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964702,0.00001715375,0.00005828702,0.00050900277,0.0001679815,0.000036982816,0.0000068356712,0.000007649729,0.002725904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867857,0.00005432424,0.00040839604,0.00019944923,0.00028025848,0.000378987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989879,0.000093413604,0.00021298359,0.00039550778,0.00024072839,0.00006947642],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021943019,0.00019175727,0.00016349742,0.00006205259,0.0033534665,0.000057683726,0.00050590705,0.000050512095,0.0007251203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007011627,0.000113778646,0.00021527441,0.00007899102,0.013929866,0.00032662658,0.000116143376,0.00021964786,0.00014480742],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005347491,0.00004928126,0.0013189903,0.000010417684,0.000062532235,0.0000027142241,0.0050025503,0.00003755852,0.000027592112,0.9911814,0.0018956783,0.00035785692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003795167,0.00004289853,0.00016208552,0.00009596171,0.00003364204,0.00004245599,0.001910784,0.000030006275,0.0005641643,0.1788995,0.8176156,0.00022334054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016404434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008345841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9695511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007484867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005378912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99794406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W140057180","doi":"10.21991/c9hw90","title":"SCIENTIFIC EXPERIMENTS ON ANIMALS AND CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Legislature; Subject (documents); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.2293077710516838,"score_gpt":0.38579427773632685,"score_spread":0.15648650668464306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W140057180","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63275796,0.0015839828,0.06539789,0.00056839443,0.0036312118,0.0011878655,0.0008930459,0.00082924805,0.29315042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99362814,0.000015677258,0.0049402593,0.00047895574,0.00014545812,0.00012102381,0.00008968191,0.000016583284,0.0005642142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966182,0.00009644444,0.0006719607,0.0010888346,0.00065365765,0.0008709064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983204,0.0001896395,0.00025769707,0.00047392552,0.00036301167,0.00039530362],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043392158,0.0005212656,0.00041232456,0.00039285986,0.002424369,0.00022044066,0.00041624636,0.00018497788,0.0009514689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005156152,0.0004926015,0.00018675062,0.00034099782,0.032258846,0.0007204691,0.00035493393,0.0003643203,0.00092378777],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050683913,0.00032900216,0.03071379,0.000019396208,0.000099424426,0.00019658689,0.0001420752,0.00001961054,0.004256422,0.96228033,0.0010321588,0.00040435212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.017939571,0.008293403,0.056973998,0.0032760056,0.00048699763,0.017730376,0.008474398,0.005297878,0.03583232,0.29659444,0.5411697,0.00793093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027602277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000051153966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6656859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019425439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008721096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W141809283","doi":"10.21991/c90669","title":"JUDGING THE JUDGES: CANADA’S NEWEST SUPREME COURT JUDGE: HON. MICHEL BASTARACHE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Michel foucault; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.04030804881258754,"score_gpt":0.2551855852914567,"score_spread":0.21487753647886915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W141809283","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011454559,0.0054173437,0.02401494,0.09677931,0.008744733,0.0019703289,0.00080578803,0.0005930054,0.85022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890239,0.00023443197,0.0005589887,0.008397333,0.0006649268,0.00014898386,0.00008429634,0.000016633177,0.0008705043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99509186,0.00025293702,0.00083654956,0.0007746401,0.0014616362,0.0015823689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99738836,0.00042481793,0.00031628166,0.0005278919,0.0008406104,0.00050202524],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010372412,0.0005491517,0.00051660667,0.00017818925,0.009072107,0.00017719451,0.0011382834,0.00027019688,0.0012221863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011971185,0.0004550738,0.00031886046,0.00076409616,0.01701828,0.0008843994,0.00037043306,0.00063128717,0.0003346701],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055123222,0.00010873951,0.05898346,0.0000066414073,0.00016380691,0.000051870993,0.00071702356,0.00008093249,0.00002387541,0.8681869,0.07107544,0.00054622104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009698635,0.0000413882,0.009990985,0.00012118926,0.00018300442,0.00012561519,0.023458377,0.00007568429,0.000117592754,0.050466422,0.91352445,0.00092545676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.58368343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81766623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97756934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011592896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016344456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W142688777","doi":"10.21991/c9gw9p","title":"MEANING FROM CHAOS: REFLECTIONS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 — TWO YEARS AFTER","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Meaning (existential); Sociology; Law; Political science; Media studies; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10606902206255776,"score_gpt":0.3520335818041039,"score_spread":0.24596455974154613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W142688777","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0447295,0.00042412526,0.017021492,0.0043577985,0.004618044,0.0006574815,0.00036572362,0.000471074,0.92735475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927526,0.00006389893,0.0026535594,0.0020809066,0.0005109845,0.00013631498,0.000053404492,0.000014263078,0.0017340595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99697524,0.0001543257,0.0004862842,0.0006539378,0.0007253494,0.001004846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984979,0.00022684284,0.00015738764,0.00040746745,0.00027653723,0.0004338424],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048872054,0.00031822876,0.00030845875,0.00022850365,0.002073745,0.00013626584,0.00042780797,0.00022747432,0.005509755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040428858,0.00033783502,0.00026972964,0.00045198426,0.005669324,0.0009791764,0.00013139435,0.0003430175,0.0022800667],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012451729,0.00014681034,0.016088814,0.0000031934471,0.000052654446,0.00009412372,0.0015340608,0.00007222153,0.000063669686,0.968213,0.013146917,0.00046001247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009657099,0.0000767412,0.0032441411,0.0003308675,0.00012954973,0.000053929118,0.00844577,0.00004915835,0.00020262819,0.06963035,0.91614777,0.0007233718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008482012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034266915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9480231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042407322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013561194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W147926961","doi":"10.21991/c9607g","title":"THE NEW HUMAN RIGHTS AGENDA: THE FIRST SHELDON CHUMIR LECTURE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Law and economics; Public administration; Environmental ethics; Law; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03916774126094504,"score_gpt":0.2763629553880958,"score_spread":0.23719521412715075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W147926961","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004468519,0.0017377862,0.03589354,0.04522465,0.005744864,0.0018538638,0.00006374036,0.0004857888,0.90452725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904004,0.000059597285,0.00036625177,0.0017098206,0.0005620902,0.000087161345,0.000028604902,0.000009455164,0.006776625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969645,0.00011660717,0.00056555675,0.0004887519,0.0007988202,0.0010657684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848723,0.0002255274,0.00020735555,0.00050612655,0.00026787043,0.00030591327],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007314904,0.00035106565,0.00025116032,0.00010806938,0.025845638,0.00034057043,0.0010623657,0.00024060239,0.00168043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013759438,0.00019354395,0.0002584056,0.00038558713,0.012163295,0.00049808266,0.00018995594,0.0004213257,0.0006006159],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022930442,0.00006200973,0.000956805,0.0000026327382,0.000075069875,0.000017290768,0.0020063445,0.000016076367,0.0000048795355,0.90664774,0.08968987,0.000498331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041364587,0.000027687543,0.0007224957,0.000040494215,0.000029973135,0.000029340006,0.00078409543,0.000007768882,0.000108465465,0.22694512,0.77060926,0.000281679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031330069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062058542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9859319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003492767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024180582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1480639299","doi":"10.21991/c9cd5d","title":"Public Interest Standing, Access to Justice, and Democracy under the Charter: Canada (AG) v Downtown Eastside Sex Workers United Against Violence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Downtown; Charter; Supreme court; Democracy; Political science; Public interest; Economic Justice; Intrusion; Public administration; Criminology; Law; Sociology; Geography; Archaeology; Politics","score_opus":0.04665941373494328,"score_gpt":0.29191571926207466,"score_spread":0.24525630552713137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1480639299","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5504736,0.001988678,0.024431404,0.30278575,0.0058923326,0.0028814788,0.00016460507,0.00043919103,0.11094299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98830754,0.00045512788,0.0001304449,0.009800193,0.00024783605,0.00012274033,0.0000815586,0.000013093697,0.0008414742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967126,0.000211521,0.00055666175,0.00059979514,0.000720179,0.0011992377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975837,0.00047697264,0.00019755021,0.00038143515,0.00060379755,0.0007565807],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005037369,0.00038577433,0.0003199478,0.0003475944,0.0056069293,0.0010865271,0.000941552,0.00024582807,0.000607478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000653869,0.00029779805,0.00009757437,0.0012734988,0.0061777337,0.0013337358,0.00039568637,0.0005069258,0.00014805343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001837069,0.000045985344,0.056565713,0.000015077754,0.00012656696,0.000016927168,0.00046903378,0.00081106304,0.000019423253,0.8981848,0.040208146,0.0035189472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018120769,0.00007034241,0.01286766,0.001324583,0.00028260003,0.00012440319,0.14444184,0.0016994367,0.00008399109,0.039387465,0.79624474,0.001660861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12877412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26581788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85879725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006961132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044416785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1480693685","doi":"10.21991/cf29363","title":"McIvor v. Canada and the 2010 Amendments to the Indian Act: A Half-Hearted Remedy to Historical Injustice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Injustice; Indigenous; Plaintiff; Political science; Law; Economic Justice; Inheritance (genetic algorithm)","score_opus":0.022561630482639816,"score_gpt":0.2761986025802654,"score_spread":0.2536369720976256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1480693685","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.073518254,0.0011981411,0.0086735,0.8527468,0.014613924,0.004882788,0.00033007545,0.00025137173,0.043785162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837052,0.000046244513,0.00049652916,0.012267959,0.0007541599,0.00023438808,0.000011905883,0.00000744779,0.0024761166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967818,0.00024339514,0.00046648798,0.00051015225,0.00102924,0.00096891914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977871,0.000548999,0.00013981809,0.00033195355,0.0006269788,0.00056514237],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090083404,0.00030507098,0.00034969908,0.00008497132,0.008354022,0.00020703014,0.00062567345,0.00014492481,0.00016631612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034446423,0.00018931279,0.00010542503,0.00069274724,0.0084161395,0.00032703584,0.0003967794,0.000349627,0.00023740686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014622144,0.000033970828,0.0037713568,0.000005571335,0.00008897047,0.000009619699,0.005957392,0.000040309737,0.00003620761,0.7905126,0.19856796,0.00082981866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00097608136,0.00005345366,0.002477281,0.000059204864,0.000072398754,0.000027623508,0.013472935,0.000029526705,0.000025708194,0.0011309126,0.9813364,0.00033843447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.69077826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93450314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.910187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002358942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028447802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99428236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W14808197","doi":"10.21991/c9z961","title":"THE EUROPEAN SOCIAL CHARTER: AN END TO THATCHERISM?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Thatcherism; Charter; Political science; Telecommunications; Computer science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.06796903635034832,"score_gpt":0.3150861933854609,"score_spread":0.24711715703511258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W14808197","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009121238,0.00022901276,0.0061720028,0.028254414,0.0034495264,0.00079273427,0.00015005816,0.00040540917,0.9514256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940979,0.000119874516,0.0002754913,0.0022571038,0.0017399918,0.00008185876,0.000019831206,0.000013639878,0.0013942918],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970435,0.00043047438,0.00043570375,0.00041595378,0.0005948445,0.0010795434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987737,0.000118907155,0.00014794795,0.00026467533,0.00030703063,0.00038776873],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001378242,0.00027886612,0.00025022842,0.000106853535,0.013560781,0.00018693083,0.00072198035,0.00016020285,0.00013384075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004003657,0.00021123237,0.00022504116,0.00043292996,0.012218515,0.0006712428,0.00022170196,0.00027350313,0.0005766991],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037306127,0.0000807949,0.0024192282,0.0000022179095,0.00007045689,0.000011807066,0.010641668,0.000002177432,0.000027724298,0.96754473,0.0064201127,0.012741743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084289577,0.00011862441,0.012896538,0.00004182499,0.00006842073,0.000027747998,0.088678434,0.000008840479,0.000100702666,0.14076851,0.75565255,0.00079492765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012766976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046653156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98497665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001891085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009723607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99046963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1481241279","doi":"10.21991/c92d5m","title":"Key Theoretical Issues in the Interaction of Law and Religion: A Guide for the Perplexed","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Hegelianism; Politics; State (computer science); Variety (cybernetics); Law; Epistemology; Key (lock); Philosophy of law; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Public law","score_opus":0.024692215112159046,"score_gpt":0.3378829214568421,"score_spread":0.3131907063446831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1481241279","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055679237,0.008050719,0.053208463,0.08817425,0.0027532384,0.002323814,0.0003960995,0.00009629124,0.8394292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99298847,0.00040107904,0.0010184624,0.0047281175,0.00046755953,0.0001724471,0.00003174916,0.0000053468348,0.00018676242],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787086,0.0002313076,0.0005099589,0.00022782153,0.00048699172,0.00067306636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99703914,0.0021287457,0.00015900792,0.0002561523,0.0002732832,0.00014369287],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015893389,0.00019870553,0.000254344,0.00008724548,0.0020109725,0.00008658515,0.00037744374,0.0001432872,0.00010782185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011461619,0.00013203788,0.00016666877,0.00024401011,0.027036142,0.00059725466,0.00008156725,0.0002385607,0.00001558812],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006148332,0.00009247918,0.0041789613,0.000011271688,0.000034651308,0.0000012395558,0.0011727503,0.000056245713,0.000018273791,0.98942524,0.0047587845,0.00018863723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045951613,0.00003792685,0.00020828567,0.000065552354,0.00006503745,0.000091821894,0.011760828,0.00009845819,0.000035731955,0.0662582,0.92073756,0.00018105142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023356508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010523308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98742056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014384011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001357119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99928826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1482326114","doi":"10.21991/c9k088","title":"THE INDEPENDENCE AND IMPARTIALITY OF PROVINCIAL COURT JUDGES: RAPPORTEUR’S COMMENTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Independence (probability theory); Law; Political science; Judicial independence; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.047623515810483394,"score_gpt":0.28810369190912355,"score_spread":0.24048017609864014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1482326114","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10197149,0.006558357,0.029577054,0.023190763,0.005810762,0.0031727417,0.0007485286,0.00042098167,0.8285493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99816465,0.0005513754,0.00026314243,0.0006205604,0.00016152013,0.00009059718,0.000015379886,0.0000051613742,0.00012761734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970962,0.00018366335,0.00068037165,0.0004079254,0.00089205825,0.0007397919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998211,0.00029573348,0.00033135092,0.00026434462,0.00063113385,0.0002663921],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012853191,0.00026456272,0.00034775434,0.0000973447,0.005361521,0.00007948509,0.0004890701,0.00020253705,0.00016738322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00090540195,0.00021112345,0.00016585001,0.00033333476,0.027189668,0.0005826398,0.0003000656,0.00028816643,0.000045583365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010578249,0.00011622046,0.13581519,0.00000627383,0.000095758034,0.000008782048,0.0006304292,0.0000028195536,0.00002335634,0.8589688,0.002520648,0.00170597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002476114,0.00023197813,0.045078233,0.00021755723,0.00025588006,0.00012072069,0.032647718,0.00006504408,0.0005897708,0.494208,0.42303795,0.0010710192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005422718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007803517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89619315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017645484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028817635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99593335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1483212777","doi":"10.21991/c96m2s","title":"LAW V. CANADA: FORMATTING EQUALITY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disk formatting; Law; Political science; Computer science; Operating system","score_opus":0.05300220965465181,"score_gpt":0.21397958625565,"score_spread":0.1609773766009982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1483212777","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0071393973,0.0013142814,0.062174145,0.0012719528,0.005282934,0.00055440457,0.0015873365,0.0001732334,0.9205023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949727,0.000034443674,0.00078057963,0.0034408004,0.00026611367,0.0000761153,0.00012246825,0.000019347435,0.0002873962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99644727,0.00003016046,0.0016456965,0.0007139083,0.00013942717,0.0010235548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981565,0.000075553864,0.0006929692,0.000542453,0.00016375321,0.00036876477],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082694896,0.0003356803,0.0007332903,0.000196268,0.0013384332,0.00011535996,0.0005454349,0.00024088894,0.0010586606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020850317,0.0004640954,0.00027074368,0.00025943966,0.0034002408,0.0011125851,0.00020606373,0.0002859818,0.0010175765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002603326,0.00007493052,0.06551118,0.000026792435,0.00010740076,0.000013314585,0.00009970601,0.000059317088,0.0000038084443,0.9297574,0.004231218,0.000088865425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001470712,0.000050607905,0.0023931644,0.0000838537,0.000022204276,0.00017504547,0.0009746567,0.0006755397,0.00022711587,0.5594367,0.43346816,0.0010222599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38926604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32058525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9878333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087459123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012486669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1483392136","doi":"10.21991/c9tq11","title":"ABORIGINAL AND TREATY RIGHTS - RECONCILING POWERS AND DUTIES: A COMMENT ON HORSEMAN, SIOUI AND SPARROW","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Sparrow; Treaty; Political science; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.02812045969686056,"score_gpt":0.28528189733142384,"score_spread":0.2571614376345633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1483392136","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5178489,0.0027604327,0.0048428816,0.025606442,0.00259866,0.0014696984,0.00029642112,0.0003775608,0.44419897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964414,0.0009072242,0.0005638558,0.0015701979,0.0001277519,0.000038196584,0.000020192932,0.0000063177345,0.00032486467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804085,0.00009327285,0.00037268986,0.0005332084,0.00038739212,0.00057260256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892384,0.00018296405,0.0001401755,0.00018049938,0.00016100999,0.0004115395],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005169653,0.00029327496,0.00031027893,0.00020355976,0.0030686464,0.00014644265,0.0001246518,0.00020813613,0.00027249713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008293064,0.00027336902,0.00007576493,0.00016627688,0.0075795427,0.00060907955,0.000053350897,0.00023258742,0.000021839782],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012478973,0.000081287115,0.022403862,0.000011869156,0.000052609954,0.000022158887,0.0024491744,0.0000034902964,0.000017883065,0.9719638,0.0014286762,0.0014403866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017102633,0.00026374604,0.0032292567,0.0002351792,0.00009203223,0.00013998603,0.005758114,0.00014239497,0.00012784208,0.042697657,0.9450757,0.0005278441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031415604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025603902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.943647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017731685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005250757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W148393335","doi":"10.21991/c99s93","title":"THE MORE THINGS CHANGE: SOVEREIGNTY, QUÉBEC AND THE NEW WORLD","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Interdisciplinary Cultural and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.04877582247027498,"score_gpt":0.2893308788411852,"score_spread":0.2405550563709102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W148393335","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012545462,0.008232968,0.0015168514,0.25072786,0.0026172143,0.0012796834,0.000037471607,0.00020986852,0.7341235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832716,0.0006270162,0.00014713104,0.0039616083,0.0006395707,0.00013692101,0.0000064958326,0.000005752204,0.011203891],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802774,0.0001400597,0.00035121024,0.00031001886,0.0004872898,0.00068365136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879277,0.0004051187,0.00016319955,0.00019281665,0.0002405899,0.00020550723],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006850959,0.00024569026,0.00025876472,0.000052948468,0.013660737,0.00020891128,0.0005188044,0.000110440364,0.00029830664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045898164,0.00013441355,0.00022008205,0.0003312838,0.028016008,0.0008713283,0.00041469678,0.0003081838,0.000098651515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013028258,0.000019387473,0.0034355405,0.0000025916852,0.00008408281,0.000005096396,0.0152618885,7.880356e-7,8.7244536e-7,0.9609837,0.017615741,0.0024600388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010654734,0.00001997062,0.0010619418,0.000059123744,0.00006724885,0.000023529745,0.04862276,0.00003056638,0.000009167131,0.2989498,0.6498086,0.000281829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04772248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1398406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98201704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023123945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013947556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98762333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1484340775","doi":"10.21991/c91958","title":"ITS ALL IN THE FAMILY: CHILD SUPPORT, TAX AND THIBAUDEAU","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.051600167727814034,"score_gpt":0.2809020562185577,"score_spread":0.22930188849074365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1484340775","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07274663,0.0025353066,0.0103359055,0.011153463,0.0028130175,0.0015466979,0.00050227466,0.00023026211,0.89813644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99147385,0.00068466115,0.0005068652,0.0065963278,0.00015638566,0.00008712797,0.000064923806,0.000009337741,0.00042054686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970959,0.00021912172,0.00052014994,0.0005230693,0.00065836334,0.0009834325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989193,0.00013319106,0.00015382032,0.00032985787,0.00021241339,0.00025141996],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011265523,0.00031742427,0.0002978987,0.00023516128,0.0020563414,0.00014038969,0.000643081,0.0002983966,0.00021337021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033338438,0.00026610543,0.00014198759,0.0005171733,0.006453844,0.0007606559,0.00014606405,0.00046047545,0.00017258439],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015499443,0.00013979709,0.053557854,0.000009530922,0.00003444199,0.00005020043,0.004593814,0.000031190386,0.000016908753,0.93715215,0.0041755834,0.00022305292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002508079,0.00014951851,0.092419155,0.00015042203,0.00013110886,0.00036667156,0.10025341,0.00037110448,0.000019782228,0.084062286,0.7184085,0.0011599122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013827076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042814035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9187272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016054466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014517969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1485315654","doi":"10.21991/c9908s","title":"CONSTITUTIONALIZING THE PATRIARCHY: ABORIGINAL WOMEN AND ABORIGINAL GOVERNMENT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Patriarchy; Government (linguistics); Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028147571320146187,"score_gpt":0.3002645235946371,"score_spread":0.27211695227449095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1485315654","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20422845,0.00589546,0.02704768,0.027887156,0.00647592,0.0033202781,0.0010065477,0.00078736467,0.7233511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99457216,0.0009450476,0.0015569727,0.0012883703,0.000422451,0.00031426697,0.000018061439,0.000010184573,0.0008724635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957633,0.00024909794,0.00061204395,0.00064411695,0.0013949022,0.0013365621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981345,0.00038887357,0.00026976687,0.00030360318,0.00041073584,0.0004925141],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001187883,0.00044290104,0.00041783985,0.00007568471,0.007269979,0.00022314506,0.0005746153,0.00022687414,0.00081479404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005057835,0.0003326283,0.000191937,0.00044477067,0.024792269,0.0010076583,0.00016069096,0.0004810303,0.00018395932],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009807537,0.00009755418,0.04790859,0.000012577652,0.00016098816,0.000029569866,0.006585787,0.000017689636,0.000039318147,0.94182557,0.002321969,0.00090233114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012201027,0.000063830325,0.0057076765,0.000081856175,0.00007513392,0.00010584042,0.03375897,0.0000346309,0.000059258957,0.03231275,0.9259837,0.00059624447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002877652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015059095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9236617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014344236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024436803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1485831801","doi":"10.21991/c9kh3j","title":"A Democratic Defence of the Court Challenges Program","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Disadvantaged; Parliament; Political science; Public administration; Law; Democracy; Government (linguistics); Politics","score_opus":0.06703664203223589,"score_gpt":0.2888507386046461,"score_spread":0.22181409657241022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1485831801","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009849576,0.0065919794,0.0071113855,0.015232736,0.0034450125,0.0019501679,0.00014261682,0.00038452845,0.955292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967889,0.00075522735,0.001386348,0.0004692286,0.00015428578,0.00021143397,0.0000060125453,0.000006505611,0.0002220544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971655,0.00017541782,0.00059187977,0.00043037336,0.00087744626,0.00075936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983495,0.0001756385,0.000298299,0.00035925492,0.0006126905,0.00020462913],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005452658,0.00028656813,0.00036759517,0.000121800695,0.00319319,0.000033414424,0.00076499785,0.00020140385,0.00024031849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008502162,0.00022227863,0.00033962668,0.00057941914,0.024256464,0.0004814943,0.0002671672,0.0002659947,0.000091636415],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003434579,0.0003022597,0.022747613,0.000014853936,0.000098872784,0.0000068664162,0.00087448047,0.000017283897,0.00002600573,0.97073376,0.0014413511,0.003702284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012104616,0.00017448452,0.02112876,0.0005590245,0.00023305116,0.0001111644,0.018713526,0.0000642451,0.0005577429,0.686112,0.27028063,0.00085494167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015642302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039521526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9869393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018889176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027801946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1486238463","doi":"10.21991/c9tw8d","title":"THE CHANGING FACE OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN CANADA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Human rights; Political science; Business; Sociology; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.031959000612028346,"score_gpt":0.2605751560421894,"score_spread":0.22861615543016106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1486238463","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.261822,0.00060139,0.0061690593,0.0028342528,0.0033033467,0.0011482832,0.00010114423,0.00009600688,0.7239245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987147,0.0000132720215,0.00018006547,0.00014786437,0.00004875227,0.000038350776,0.000011956761,0.0000029372534,0.0008421184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978237,0.00008627688,0.0005174056,0.0002528432,0.00055480143,0.0007649536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991551,0.00013016791,0.00016527966,0.00020772219,0.00018200108,0.00015973551],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005703223,0.00016850307,0.00021512629,0.00016851656,0.0041773594,0.000035296976,0.00043948687,0.00007983906,0.00035955705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007402175,0.0001227561,0.000076204495,0.00038539516,0.004549378,0.00027667495,0.000096948934,0.0001670953,0.000026930298],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011144562,0.000032008862,0.013687256,0.000003422397,0.000021523158,0.000019321651,0.0015514606,0.000023842535,0.000008674708,0.9833543,0.0010731092,0.00021395454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011952883,0.000037004356,0.0075128847,0.00023141957,0.000024120558,0.000022588407,0.026240971,0.00008274724,0.0010075264,0.20013405,0.7628591,0.0006522614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7492752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9862857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78322023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008118248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006448153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99918437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W148650106","doi":"10.21991/c98d5g","title":"THE HARD CASE OF DEFINING “THE MÉTIS PEOPLE” AND THEIR RIGHTS: A COMMENT ON R. V. POWLEY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Treaty; Section (typography); Law; Political science; Task (project management); Constitutional law; Business; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.036990190960873595,"score_gpt":0.2787448181654569,"score_spread":0.2417546272045833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W148650106","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21869192,0.01755015,0.016431298,0.27632448,0.0080947345,0.0057692914,0.0017985961,0.0006565729,0.45468295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976883,0.00027076126,0.00037343457,0.0013003096,0.000072328985,0.000112192356,0.000011733624,0.000005185968,0.00016574834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978498,0.00024419153,0.00048049487,0.00033924356,0.0003716342,0.0007145939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978943,0.0010366363,0.00025134248,0.00028619135,0.00035500576,0.00017656077],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009425232,0.0002848296,0.00031019698,0.000057226647,0.011436845,0.0001121792,0.00038762137,0.00013800261,0.00009975219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007049036,0.00015205774,0.00019136332,0.00029274393,0.014429413,0.0003162347,0.0002485002,0.00029809447,0.000068677604],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050277973,0.00006912864,0.005946871,0.000006058291,0.0001290098,0.000023840224,0.0068210117,0.000009639827,0.0000076028887,0.9795869,0.0063333735,0.0010162657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013743697,0.00016766066,0.0040761735,0.00022507114,0.00011726249,0.00060776895,0.11766507,0.00013246396,0.00028937467,0.049794775,0.82494557,0.0006044275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010903195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018124258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92979217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023521844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042519605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1488097330","doi":"10.21991/c9s67t","title":"Re-Framing the Sharia Arbitration Debate","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Sharia; Religious freedom; Nothing; Arbitration; Law; Political science; Human rights; Hatred; Freedom of religion; Islam; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.04711717255424792,"score_gpt":0.2850996094726049,"score_spread":0.23798243691835697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1488097330","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025978968,0.00069241767,0.107102625,0.0074799573,0.002651039,0.00075688015,0.000048273054,0.0002918669,0.87837905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99539346,0.00016504084,0.0011063134,0.0021508918,0.00030589598,0.000110130015,0.000064200525,0.000008923374,0.00069514976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997505,0.00017152092,0.00049934984,0.0004238566,0.0006737836,0.0007264911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986072,0.00018818525,0.00021491492,0.000361302,0.00041202497,0.00021632858],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089373486,0.0002483565,0.00020480243,0.00016839014,0.004307307,0.00019820209,0.00055425876,0.00023520415,0.0006823946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008133965,0.00020127386,0.00020276614,0.0004699711,0.007776425,0.0010128408,0.00010110128,0.00027519075,0.0004298301],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003502,0.00007702124,0.0059618466,0.000006059779,0.00003472312,0.000012549376,0.0020603538,0.000056352656,0.00006810284,0.98203474,0.00867994,0.0009732982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015905459,0.00009132111,0.0031279922,0.00017805382,0.00018501903,0.00008053462,0.042857096,0.00084395823,0.00076484244,0.74703723,0.20232256,0.00092082605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004328762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0104608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9927956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024563534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017320948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99698895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1489398868","doi":"10.21991/c94t1v","title":"“Irreconcilable? The Duty to Consult and Administrative Decision Makers”","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Duty; Sovereignty; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Formative assessment; Relation (database); Sociology; History","score_opus":0.03535903856437894,"score_gpt":0.32172282689042964,"score_spread":0.2863637883260507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1489398868","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0895129,0.0010040192,0.12357629,0.21107651,0.0022581385,0.0053748987,0.00065694295,0.0004141132,0.56612617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906352,0.00008747822,0.0026543562,0.0043413346,0.00016984508,0.0004630497,0.000024014369,0.000006901026,0.0016178045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977485,0.000093957926,0.00045125696,0.00049441523,0.0005238605,0.0006880355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977703,0.0007072193,0.00012631294,0.0003453684,0.0005604014,0.0004903807],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000524917,0.00024502355,0.00023125052,0.000100939855,0.0042938413,0.00044057122,0.00044385367,0.00016331075,0.0010427838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010687335,0.00018892021,0.000108696404,0.000504639,0.007411598,0.0007177734,0.0002215865,0.0002679408,0.0014503347],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017312626,0.00004367051,0.004518377,0.0000027625078,0.000026337679,0.0000025430652,0.00040689827,0.00006656958,0.0000841021,0.9631394,0.026928086,0.004763948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006076022,0.000040442777,0.00274109,0.000060778148,0.000028169237,0.000055519096,0.010272504,0.00018466596,0.00008421427,0.05514674,0.93042994,0.00034831467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015590371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002822204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90799266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021910339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019489919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1489450614","doi":"10.21991/c9nd5w","title":"The Truth About Canadian Judicial Activism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial activism; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Scrutiny; Legislature; Judicial review; Deference; Parliament; Economic Justice; Judicial deference; Judicial independence; Judicial restraint; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.038149313754194385,"score_gpt":0.2667368051314889,"score_spread":0.2285874913772945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1489450614","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028295408,0.002505394,0.006357361,0.012561744,0.009163173,0.00074780965,0.00025171338,0.00029129488,0.965292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99634236,0.0006297141,0.0002398435,0.0013914246,0.00072181557,0.00015649252,0.00003148157,0.00001112656,0.00047576588],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99616414,0.00017832068,0.00059046317,0.00055577944,0.0008615167,0.0016497622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99755025,0.00054300943,0.00019809756,0.00034929538,0.00060490525,0.00075442914],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008572761,0.00038025854,0.0003425303,0.00025111818,0.016617665,0.00022073918,0.0008167222,0.0002902173,0.0006317746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017826123,0.00031457766,0.0003066743,0.0006812212,0.024372522,0.0007595141,0.00015541667,0.0004431516,0.0008408171],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005844827,0.000058827238,0.010620282,0.000001702339,0.00012249916,0.000037034304,0.0005564699,0.000009386609,0.000005680255,0.97771925,0.0072291233,0.003581294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050764246,0.00003459741,0.004924351,0.00006249889,0.00006189468,0.000045728273,0.007093938,0.000014316903,0.000043102464,0.23156697,0.7551645,0.00048047988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20600602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46111384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9935128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008026328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00975091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1490264631","doi":"10.21991/c9ww9d","title":"Arbitration Using Sharia Law in Canada: A Constitutional and Human Rights Perspective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Studies and Policies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Sharia; Law; Statute; Political science; Adjudication; Religious law; Government (linguistics); Islam; Public law; Common law; Family law; Geography","score_opus":0.04494612092775147,"score_gpt":0.2895543192311775,"score_spread":0.24460819830342606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1490264631","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07511644,0.00096776214,0.0049337395,0.0031596138,0.001647067,0.0009369782,0.00037098472,0.00011098767,0.91275644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979516,0.000018218474,0.00058788783,0.0011078034,0.00017913777,0.00004187481,0.000025788066,0.00000489122,0.00008275875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975426,0.00011928031,0.0005066595,0.0004850987,0.0005377425,0.00080859207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890834,0.00010965523,0.00016094197,0.00016536524,0.00038165087,0.0002740478],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033811538,0.00029527635,0.0003516413,0.0001656488,0.0050287764,0.00009342636,0.00023829452,0.00016203437,0.00034820393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011966785,0.00029660866,0.000092581606,0.00037098635,0.01617669,0.00086693536,0.00012863975,0.0003114398,0.000016508671],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002892782,0.00006800745,0.036130045,0.0000057127913,0.00005600157,0.00004258386,0.0012654484,0.00007865546,0.000035301735,0.96177864,0.00050091307,0.000009731474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00321446,0.00009413818,0.010879777,0.00035708584,0.000152658,0.00026114882,0.036643177,0.0003985876,0.00026489914,0.5736332,0.37249488,0.0016059837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9811364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9918285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9228352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024829572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066965763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1490470204","doi":"10.21991/c9z393","title":"Alberta's Métis Settlements and the Co-Management Agreement","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metis; Human settlement; Destiny (ISS module); Set-aside; Geography; Archaeology; Engineering; Computer science; Ecology; Database","score_opus":0.017801257884777773,"score_gpt":0.31959245856719093,"score_spread":0.30179120068241316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1490470204","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008926688,0.00072570296,0.060784176,0.046861663,0.0046591256,0.0045128735,0.00020596785,0.00014054537,0.87318325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817515,0.00030309317,0.00050419546,0.011965379,0.00025460165,0.0009113783,0.00015000175,0.000011724903,0.004148121],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961484,0.00036893555,0.00081896555,0.00052197755,0.0004020866,0.0017396185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99785,0.00092109956,0.00029621227,0.00044625535,0.0002961285,0.00019033282],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016428153,0.00034678195,0.00048675225,0.00014509377,0.014964451,0.000037282953,0.00032785,0.0002002765,0.0010063873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000375091,0.00024586957,0.00014988636,0.00017961074,0.00532218,0.00019468658,0.00070850004,0.00045723424,0.0016714692],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014748189,0.000059493937,0.043612596,0.00007002713,0.00025959726,0.000005231374,0.00119252,0.00006868068,0.0000022314202,0.9116549,0.04203659,0.0008906369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0076718135,0.000079919955,0.0029014216,0.00013093767,0.00014623729,0.000044705903,0.018981645,0.0005082635,0.000004424176,0.0204076,0.94875664,0.00036639225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017464221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008124438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9728248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004269574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005295398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1491314947","doi":"10.21991/c9sm22","title":"The Perfect Storm: Section 12, Mandatory Minimum Sentences and the Problem of the Unusual Case","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Charter; Political science; Legislation; Mandate; Sentence; Punishment (psychology); Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.012680692947726304,"score_gpt":0.2534257121302005,"score_spread":0.24074501918247418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491314947","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8836031,0.0038074623,0.012743198,0.03495629,0.004900601,0.002901857,0.00010586312,0.00015027393,0.056831367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979163,0.0003991943,0.00007884691,0.00036398033,0.00024287905,0.0001819679,0.0000045985894,0.0000045401343,0.000807694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99781185,0.00038656502,0.00046746177,0.00030144735,0.00055700215,0.0004756802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998004,0.00081657886,0.00027488163,0.00030184007,0.00048322105,0.00011946135],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010937834,0.0002007473,0.00023084313,0.00009575787,0.00893359,0.0002695946,0.00037826327,0.000128039,0.00011589645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041745484,0.00010540768,0.0002802642,0.0004965646,0.019984456,0.0005429432,0.00017532577,0.00031036543,0.000027982796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057697976,0.000050664104,0.00962453,0.00001499536,0.000121317964,0.0000081963335,0.0017763438,0.0002073815,0.0000446763,0.97689384,0.0035540217,0.0076463455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002189387,0.0000948399,0.0013470573,0.00018552724,0.00095198106,0.0021760704,0.74607736,0.002841713,0.000115402814,0.018380512,0.2251012,0.00053893996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017530775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05542028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9585133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015288952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011380797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99235666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1491735705","doi":"10.21991/c9707s","title":"THE NAFTA DURUM DISPUTE AND THE CANADA GRAIN ACT: A CASE STUDY IN INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business; International trade","score_opus":0.025071011320314685,"score_gpt":0.25410505622461244,"score_spread":0.22903404490429774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491735705","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6886191,0.004150624,0.0042145317,0.08853497,0.0066591175,0.006757472,0.0009405232,0.00017375418,0.19994992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964578,0.00006739609,0.00010953144,0.0019469538,0.000105204475,0.0002538036,0.000008061147,0.0000058561222,0.0010453714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971115,0.00027143795,0.00060469593,0.0004249027,0.0006861259,0.00090136717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985443,0.00047835946,0.0001876277,0.0003102975,0.00016253197,0.0003169126],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014444741,0.00027428486,0.0002679099,0.00010380779,0.0077344836,0.00016339698,0.00050274003,0.00010720939,0.000066922425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00095350697,0.00019226114,0.00007851659,0.00050304504,0.013207969,0.00045730686,0.00020394755,0.0003692954,0.000015175512],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010171236,0.0000805334,0.033671934,0.000003703203,0.000059635535,0.0013392195,0.0039035901,0.000024283283,2.2971719e-7,0.95498073,0.0042934185,0.0015410124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0042162593,0.000028737426,0.019029543,0.00008082752,0.000042685184,0.003232148,0.037450932,0.00012659705,0.000006759281,0.012512491,0.922715,0.0005580314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9022167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99631697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9424682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095720374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01781975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99355733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1491919779","doi":"10.21991/c96m35","title":"Administrative Law, Judicial Deference, and the Charter","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Doctrine; Administrative law; Law; Judicial deference; Charter; Political science; Judicial review; Standard of review; Judicial opinion","score_opus":0.03788362426289593,"score_gpt":0.31262739621202357,"score_spread":0.27474377194912764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491919779","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006334362,0.00068406074,0.043937124,0.07716242,0.0019126207,0.00085191365,0.0000887745,0.00018518596,0.86884356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945851,0.000092183225,0.00028051727,0.0040631145,0.00040951688,0.00008120641,0.000017980612,0.000004633669,0.00046573783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978002,0.00027898158,0.00037103434,0.00039660014,0.00053825893,0.0006149281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998371,0.00075079844,0.0001356185,0.00023337096,0.00025957962,0.0002496319],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011064722,0.00022515356,0.00029800017,0.00006480346,0.004415932,0.00025171373,0.0003546075,0.00015734293,0.00023788291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009155549,0.00016909075,0.00014562951,0.0002052525,0.032301646,0.00062242587,0.00011789393,0.0002598713,0.00019379056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012230838,0.000028671886,0.0015885634,0.0000058963565,0.000025207584,0.000003806547,0.0005665315,0.000009595513,0.000010132827,0.9934823,0.003102829,0.0010541355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013833714,0.000049606573,0.0002673645,0.000086314845,0.000067763445,0.000064701344,0.004293616,0.00016489087,0.00003541523,0.260438,0.73286045,0.00028854725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014014994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059987972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98825073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008679122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009535968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493223159","doi":"10.21991/c9r37g","title":"Rebuttal to Edmund A. Aunger, “The Constitution of Canada and the Official Status of French in Alberta”","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Rebuttal; Constitution; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.01705604078274909,"score_gpt":0.24308310604360334,"score_spread":0.22602706526085425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1493223159","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27976424,0.0022195417,0.011139992,0.016651988,0.004397824,0.0029990762,0.0011164551,0.000040785788,0.6816701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998734,0.000053118896,0.00013234164,0.00052170845,0.00007851719,0.00003361069,0.000006793659,0.0000031181507,0.0004368122],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973453,0.00020397645,0.0007182756,0.00027653162,0.0006258156,0.0008300514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827796,0.0006427211,0.00027255333,0.0002581118,0.00027797706,0.00027066472],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081433606,0.0001869124,0.00039055306,0.000084014864,0.00077411573,0.000023716526,0.00035811582,0.0001240599,0.00009397182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023554373,0.00012934896,0.00010012834,0.00044995878,0.01460838,0.00023371317,0.00013069993,0.00019929248,0.000007972181],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000109722256,0.00005293043,0.041570097,0.00001385294,0.000032273063,0.000004126632,0.0010935331,0.0000865624,0.000015567644,0.9552065,0.0016289195,0.00018588646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00566338,0.00013899153,0.08483664,0.0006910708,0.0001323854,0.00008680065,0.008482996,0.00030053916,0.0005587228,0.0891879,0.80902296,0.00089758664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9714029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97681975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86601865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036525662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008272462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99734974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493551315","doi":"10.21991/c9pt0f","title":"Case Comment: Canada (Attorney General) v PHS Community Services Society","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Discretion; Jurisprudence; Political science; Legal guardian; Constitutional court; Public administration; Constitution","score_opus":0.04371893510183338,"score_gpt":0.26364144151413,"score_spread":0.2199225064122966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1493551315","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10930686,0.0018671309,0.011717728,0.013235099,0.0071362737,0.0016930562,0.0013641582,0.00063776044,0.85304195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99041206,0.00007263736,0.00061449123,0.007877312,0.00037414525,0.000074145464,0.00010551368,0.000012711084,0.00045696454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968998,0.00033670594,0.00063778745,0.00039509754,0.00073255354,0.0009980808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979702,0.00019793778,0.00028858107,0.00042512332,0.0006008998,0.00051725213],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009010756,0.00036267453,0.00040830192,0.00007617256,0.00922015,0.00016295534,0.0006752914,0.00027027194,0.00055665337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015798544,0.00036497286,0.00023825135,0.00048945384,0.00541215,0.0010287964,0.00025487668,0.00058534206,0.00007027644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021618922,0.00016061898,0.013922751,0.00006751518,0.00011880587,0.0002542647,0.0032568013,0.00003483712,0.000017288114,0.9582093,0.023645967,0.00029023015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096765684,0.000044051758,0.00023349111,0.00016360782,0.00008663787,0.00086419866,0.052657094,0.00014413553,0.0001800278,0.013716313,0.9302342,0.00070859614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9490386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93220645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.944493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008255287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006966203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W149426997","doi":"10.21991/c93x06","title":"JUDICIAL REVIEW IN THE NEW HONG KONG: PROPHECIES AND PORTENTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.061022954876434284,"score_gpt":0.2913992043137709,"score_spread":0.23037624943733664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W149426997","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056938645,0.05384942,0.0071698907,0.06220925,0.0026176053,0.0028354912,0.00011609417,0.00025153556,0.86525685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844652,0.008125715,0.00039842766,0.0062973946,0.00033487653,0.000106480795,0.000021955639,0.0000058834084,0.00024409914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970294,0.0001951295,0.0006290868,0.00049222173,0.00084757654,0.00080653216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989097,0.00016585826,0.00018881232,0.0002420316,0.00024669123,0.00024691713],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000984132,0.00031473674,0.00042273817,0.00016886531,0.0027002944,0.000088222114,0.00053741643,0.00016239629,0.0003771368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00093576784,0.00024516432,0.00017397928,0.00075923384,0.011510518,0.00073370343,0.00017550943,0.0003442069,0.00013847959],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028799232,0.00010519055,0.035244506,0.000024189329,0.000040931576,0.000051864034,0.0008443182,0.000002009922,0.0000052905066,0.94709253,0.0144632645,0.0020971312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015032623,0.00010180151,0.02712226,0.0018521395,0.00021796694,0.00028300312,0.014000848,0.000008214332,0.000020621552,0.35001707,0.6039728,0.0009000238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061114985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005921326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9787713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016066586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028470093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1497789910","doi":"10.21991/c93m37","title":"THE AFFAIR OF THE CHAIRS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Caucus; House of Commons; Opposition (politics); Prime minister; Ballot; Parliament; Political science; Alliance; Law; Politics; Humiliation; Voting","score_opus":0.02047646147862565,"score_gpt":0.21909218954659512,"score_spread":0.19861572806796948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1497789910","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023477362,0.001961545,0.0028014046,0.015439688,0.0062040887,0.0006638027,0.00018370876,0.00010504948,0.970293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937488,0.00021094058,0.00009744371,0.0003399186,0.00011664235,0.000035430003,0.000003873216,0.000004463616,0.0054424955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982631,0.00011480338,0.00035525355,0.0002210304,0.00052195805,0.00052383466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988418,0.00013652914,0.00019661734,0.00038778648,0.0002665647,0.00017067621],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005326025,0.00012669481,0.00015150856,0.00016690172,0.00800405,0.00012801602,0.0007460121,0.00013306657,0.0005397542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005945811,0.000100601894,0.0002620686,0.00047189943,0.03263891,0.0003490993,0.00012563665,0.00021205106,0.00015250141],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016493632,0.000035572335,0.0029802816,0.0000039518854,0.000030684376,0.0000027269296,0.00074958365,0.000007734376,0.000019416164,0.9768676,0.018423036,0.00086289184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002466573,0.000011721581,0.0013638588,0.00004461324,0.00002805913,0.000017372968,0.0058499714,0.000007462452,0.0000629408,0.035236474,0.9569814,0.00014942249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03184736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40094393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9914011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051235216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055603376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9932874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1498544013","doi":"10.21991/c99w94","title":"The Fixed-Date Election Law: Constitutional Convention or Conventional Politics?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Law; Political science; General election; Convention; Prime minister; Politics; Democracy; Constitutional court; Constitution","score_opus":0.026385093745672047,"score_gpt":0.3035225852739148,"score_spread":0.27713749152824274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1498544013","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049880096,0.0039453125,0.16505688,0.029911663,0.020370888,0.0023022904,0.0013979631,0.0007092625,0.7713177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868097,0.00016658686,0.00032583272,0.002151163,0.0018159444,0.00021948706,0.0001698124,0.000012775335,0.008328715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99466306,0.0003826735,0.00094776426,0.00050147815,0.0013669075,0.0021381038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968783,0.0008629446,0.0004007389,0.00038271642,0.00065417605,0.0008211144],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001663572,0.00041778674,0.00038996866,0.00012020882,0.010066921,0.0003750565,0.0005328909,0.00037012386,0.0009521595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015179525,0.00032392453,0.00039671786,0.00049180334,0.029086089,0.001887246,0.00015295233,0.00047080175,0.0010091229],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000084326915,0.00019492288,0.009209387,0.000016438267,0.000113381015,0.000007703106,0.000064154585,0.000026298268,0.000047474387,0.97339123,0.016560579,0.00028408514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001102952,0.00004208042,0.00086834613,0.00012618283,0.00006503523,0.00025106588,0.000865262,0.000073883624,0.00018771368,0.04365628,0.95227426,0.00048693243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037208004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028402032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98182166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085420324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036743695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1498821330","doi":"10.21991/c9zq18","title":"Sometimes Constitutions are Made in the Streets: the Future of the Charter’s Notwithstanding Clause","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Legislature; Charter; Political science; Parliament; Law; Constitution; Law and economics; Politics; Order (exchange); Constitutional law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.04098074569533218,"score_gpt":0.2691496057889388,"score_spread":0.22816886009360665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1498821330","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0736086,0.015836855,0.012382474,0.1485515,0.013932366,0.0056806984,0.0016989346,0.00037085003,0.72793776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961414,0.00050582335,0.0001403347,0.0023592599,0.0005089092,0.00017390102,0.0000139157855,0.0000075324447,0.00014893102],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961015,0.0004809792,0.00081967365,0.0004836229,0.001177622,0.0009366124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99784434,0.00048475663,0.00047985665,0.00062312174,0.00043198885,0.00013595528],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001286268,0.00039721534,0.00043984473,0.00021116044,0.006568507,0.000115457355,0.0015726476,0.00026107204,0.00028708603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006331508,0.00022275465,0.00042381042,0.0014845887,0.029755348,0.0006601263,0.00029573712,0.0006812038,0.00007251713],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044867244,0.00018669898,0.096996844,0.000008117173,0.000087982524,0.000015361418,0.00270512,0.000057445224,0.00002303258,0.89640605,0.0031580115,0.0003104397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018166393,0.0000738354,0.06831331,0.0006458823,0.00028936157,0.00020022294,0.19842827,0.00004199678,0.00020312573,0.28382823,0.44528133,0.00087777444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024901875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017889868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9225328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031460632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026706401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1499115456","doi":"10.21991/c9t66r","title":"SUPREME COURT OF CANADA IN BRYDGES EXANDS RIGHT TO COUNSEL","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Right to counsel; Remand (court procedure)","score_opus":0.023685569509992642,"score_gpt":0.25293871170625226,"score_spread":0.2292531421962596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1499115456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05153747,0.0011269579,0.014521137,0.009014193,0.0040982612,0.0013232185,0.00045560958,0.00013503818,0.9177881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978116,0.000041578918,0.00033048075,0.0008284317,0.00014624155,0.000057468846,0.000016000018,0.000007120994,0.00076107454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971821,0.00008945776,0.0006820379,0.00039346432,0.00082856097,0.0008243807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985272,0.00013473118,0.00018599552,0.00022408538,0.00055746647,0.0003704868],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069426035,0.00023373477,0.00041569417,0.00023193007,0.001046947,0.000041187777,0.00046487304,0.00017684657,0.00069478585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000597377,0.00023145085,0.00009512258,0.0007307947,0.003120247,0.0005472538,0.000079719255,0.00018754724,0.00003740252],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057406996,0.000098686316,0.044428926,0.000022713577,0.000028376217,0.0000353546,0.0010305714,0.00010124722,0.00007426599,0.9377464,0.016241044,0.00013499043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014436514,0.00011136352,0.006288665,0.00052336964,0.00004109152,0.0000463189,0.010322098,0.000042876323,0.0019409764,0.03811914,0.94026554,0.00085489266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.59842855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9036621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94627416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005315078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011007125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1499700966","doi":"10.21991/c9f66b","title":"IMPOVERISHMENT OF THE LAW BY THE LAW: A CRITIQUE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S VISION OF THE RULE OF LAW AND THE FEDERAL PRINCIPLE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.020252299983048484,"score_gpt":0.2229640320825438,"score_spread":0.20271173209949533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1499700966","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37861726,0.005362793,0.0030656625,0.011553615,0.0050058686,0.0031739096,0.004680169,0.000028621229,0.5885121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99742264,0.00011745966,0.00006586592,0.0021127623,0.00006904222,0.000056308116,0.000008581205,0.000010582556,0.00013676418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763405,0.00011981212,0.0013895484,0.00034143,0.00016304552,0.0003521197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997501,0.00015545756,0.0012722827,0.00084229134,0.00017040962,0.00005853112],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010354768,0.0002244108,0.0006242397,0.000034174675,0.0011824099,0.000043743843,0.0009151815,0.00016947635,0.0000693489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014218317,0.00012950238,0.0005077993,0.00016548556,0.018042052,0.0002936486,0.00055435766,0.00022656018,0.000005995083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078190635,0.00011864973,0.025078034,0.000045732642,0.00013395137,1.288036e-7,0.00037636314,0.00013319106,0.00018116458,0.9730275,0.0008169152,0.000010146717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005285567,0.00014193407,0.012182899,0.00048428623,0.00013328038,0.00009472503,0.001163745,0.0011885714,0.021751622,0.7947824,0.1622058,0.0005851713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010073646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001819141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6188054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011262291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027985428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1499908485","doi":"10.21991/c9mw9x","title":"LE DIPTYQUE CÔTÉ-ADAMS OU LA PRÉSÉANCE DE L’ORDRE ÉTABLI DANS LE DROIT POST-COLONIAL DES PEUPLES AUTOCHTONES","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Colonialism; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.026057964821221264,"score_gpt":0.22387699729349433,"score_spread":0.19781903247227306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1499908485","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.123418614,0.03611739,0.10896192,0.21710043,0.009481591,0.002052644,0.005493156,0.00094849034,0.49642578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9695057,0.0018125022,0.0013440078,0.0007454105,0.0008338173,0.00021688992,0.00022009933,0.000030496845,0.025291074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956585,0.00024318753,0.0010223242,0.00088669104,0.0005749205,0.0016143563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99746686,0.00023776956,0.00039218715,0.00040985446,0.0009718266,0.00052152626],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045652353,0.00077214907,0.0008884972,0.0002038506,0.020650838,0.00038434548,0.0006785953,0.0005071699,0.0010258788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003968637,0.00075517735,0.0009310356,0.00033820004,0.03196518,0.0015014382,0.000360055,0.0006813004,0.00031377122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012724588,0.00090730086,0.0042074188,0.0001391534,0.0006534369,0.00017200713,0.012423576,0.00032644306,0.00012043707,0.9737219,0.0063008564,0.00090018817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015747938,0.00022097024,0.0017668866,0.00042730183,0.00053495,0.0004368428,0.019216746,0.00037833382,0.00012642302,0.15289165,0.82116646,0.0012586244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.062077053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08169542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8460871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023624168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032258474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1503359472","doi":"10.21991/c98q12","title":"HUNTING FOR ANSWERS IN A STRANGE KETTLE OF FISH: UNILATERALISM, PATERNALISM AND FIDUCIARY RHETORIC IN BADGER AND VAN DER PEET","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Historical Art and Culture Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kettle (birds); Paternalism; Badger; Rhetoric; Fiduciary; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Theology; Ecology","score_opus":0.04282530135862936,"score_gpt":0.22624778482486943,"score_spread":0.18342248346624007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1503359472","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78294307,0.00434627,0.0022539222,0.0043922383,0.0030806668,0.00172836,0.0011404029,0.00012896037,0.1999861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99859923,0.000067982124,0.000238032,0.00043202285,0.00009558596,0.00006590796,0.000041471503,0.0000070335004,0.00045276218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986989,0.000026082313,0.00045061042,0.0003060184,0.00014211569,0.00037626398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994956,0.00007422962,0.00010546196,0.00009735702,0.00015226168,0.00007505515],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018521903,0.00021295532,0.000332622,0.00020636193,0.0004608639,0.00003892354,0.00009561951,0.00008603991,0.00018373727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000075566815,0.00018651395,0.00007762832,0.00007871577,0.0027369366,0.00048373474,0.00006955893,0.00013852197,0.000003909437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006737277,0.00008901143,0.037366327,0.000070225164,0.00003903334,0.000011201757,0.008704517,0.000006021625,0.0000610073,0.9521099,0.001080272,0.00039515074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006625441,0.00034168857,0.021565296,0.00096779777,0.00018447824,0.00010612119,0.019437166,0.00030352472,0.00040972442,0.15901572,0.7895901,0.0014529552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006549099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006470227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79309416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000069522765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000107229185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1504041179","doi":"10.21991/c9d37c","title":"BEYOND THE FLIGHT FROM CONSTITUTIONAL LEGALISM: RETHINKING THE POLITICS OF SOCIAL POLICY POST-CHARLOTTETOWN","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legalism (Western philosophy); Politics; Constitution; Political science; Law; Constitutional law; Constitutional economics; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.031017979586912263,"score_gpt":0.277386561025107,"score_spread":0.24636858143819473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1504041179","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026096394,0.0020499912,0.024471667,0.14064804,0.0055601825,0.0016415267,0.0057918276,0.00028807356,0.7934523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98941183,0.000043914544,0.00037658325,0.0067494567,0.0018833942,0.00007263251,0.00009534755,0.000011262652,0.0013555696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99553686,0.0003896698,0.0009509872,0.0005106726,0.0013562343,0.0012555973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972081,0.0006135002,0.00052498694,0.0004904546,0.0008535941,0.00030937378],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010486383,0.0003922289,0.0004784212,0.0001446998,0.007123809,0.00016178413,0.001202495,0.00038821335,0.0007444482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001713751,0.00026883578,0.0004575148,0.0006114528,0.046168707,0.00075188186,0.00029360212,0.00058703765,0.00016298449],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038552393,0.00010631693,0.002920749,0.0000090742715,0.0001449112,0.000010847128,0.0045755096,0.000010203296,0.0001320843,0.9846097,0.007284646,0.00015738852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067289494,0.000031910404,0.0040848623,0.00008809004,0.00010026196,0.000058601436,0.0055115353,0.000023039964,0.00028397018,0.42982793,0.5589063,0.00041059087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0434886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034388346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9633154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053451385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072413757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1504779803","doi":"10.21991/c9f67q","title":"A Constitutional Discussion of Participatory Democracy in Greece","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Democracy; Participatory democracy; Political science; Citizen journalism; Commission; European commission; Government (linguistics); Political economy; Public administration; Representative democracy; Politics; Law; European union; Economics; Economic policy","score_opus":0.04022751498258377,"score_gpt":0.33103568810612116,"score_spread":0.2908081731235374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1504779803","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.067802705,0.0011256587,0.09406263,0.12569132,0.007230106,0.002393804,0.0004970769,0.00056442,0.7006323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99765897,0.00013614827,0.00045504275,0.000820825,0.00038333493,0.0000798898,0.00003453278,0.000005863279,0.00042540662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996726,0.00032485326,0.0007512552,0.00044807757,0.00079411623,0.0009557019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984094,0.00041135252,0.00029534305,0.00026010885,0.00033547316,0.00028833342],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011970523,0.00030078788,0.0005235884,0.00025853678,0.0024142393,0.0000435474,0.00038848486,0.00030377746,0.00012995947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021721933,0.0002319887,0.00026327054,0.0007244409,0.029729836,0.000703619,0.00017098727,0.00032624343,0.00011958736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005053987,0.00016616126,0.085759684,0.00002180438,0.00004229562,0.0000059227514,0.0006548834,0.00034324982,0.00007498703,0.9091448,0.0013351904,0.002400463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0043688933,0.00012826326,0.013881807,0.0007523148,0.00012264136,0.000051184757,0.017008169,0.00088632206,0.0004266209,0.619491,0.3416107,0.0012721326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006876423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002453131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92985624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030350825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020185981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1506276622","doi":"10.21991/c94087","title":"THE SEARCH FOR REASONABLE LIMITS: IS OAKES RETIRED?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Retirement, Disability, and Employment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Econometrics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2586318622772972,"score_gpt":0.39526003368296647,"score_spread":0.1366281714056693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1506276622","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014923314,0.0024943056,0.039578743,0.04208118,0.006501467,0.004317396,0.0006776768,0.00052465784,0.88890123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99112463,0.0005573822,0.001161518,0.0013467966,0.0003292803,0.0004613665,0.00005340568,0.000014869152,0.0049507255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963025,0.000177423,0.0006168438,0.00063190795,0.0008938969,0.0013774597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997638,0.00052751106,0.00015868424,0.00055629876,0.0007310648,0.00038847956],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017819522,0.00031075595,0.00029034782,0.00010052325,0.007989564,0.00025315466,0.0007955003,0.00024337944,0.00067506847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000918515,0.00025188897,0.00035765074,0.00040025078,0.0148133235,0.0006567705,0.00013180387,0.00023440419,0.0002765743],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013383072,0.00016648878,0.036056146,0.00002101952,0.000082027924,0.000002623137,0.0013857682,0.000009853087,0.00002865805,0.9286026,0.031190716,0.0023203006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009732987,0.00013290296,0.0009993524,0.00010739766,0.000070339345,0.000014051019,0.019377843,0.00010987682,0.0011299439,0.105270594,0.8713266,0.0004877446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014976608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019737137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97620136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004990522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027256415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1507271524","doi":"10.21991/c95t0s","title":"Legislators and Religious-Based Reasoning","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Politics; Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Political science; Government (linguistics); Action (physics); Rule of law; Sociology; Epistemology; Law and economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011594263062167053,"score_gpt":0.26505938803944007,"score_spread":0.253465124977273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1507271524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021264005,0.00259311,0.09472115,0.03460246,0.002253298,0.0014465639,0.00023878789,0.00070408126,0.84217656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895292,0.00016326715,0.004306086,0.0043650907,0.00030155966,0.00014578519,0.00006868681,0.000012577963,0.0011077278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99697554,0.0001506608,0.0005228435,0.0005583471,0.0007011299,0.0010914765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99787307,0.00041398386,0.0001977145,0.00031243204,0.00054121227,0.0006616056],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004053601,0.00035156656,0.00035855226,0.0002518592,0.0032784017,0.0003028851,0.00033948635,0.00026468566,0.0007358109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009216991,0.00036113002,0.00018175704,0.00044880513,0.020926792,0.0009999728,0.000110516725,0.0003318842,0.0004936752],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011662427,0.000054696728,0.028536843,0.00000872251,0.000036233654,0.0000121712155,0.00009029451,0.00022949676,0.000034082426,0.95699006,0.013207906,0.00078783697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008154955,0.00004704973,0.00070242496,0.00013708869,0.000049872426,0.000083632,0.0030724548,0.0004831622,0.00004513701,0.023931326,0.9700018,0.00063052244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044820686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00053598644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96826524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034308428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073678275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1508717189","doi":"10.21991/c9c65b","title":"SUPREME COURT SCEPTICAL ABOUT PRESUMPTION OF CROWN IMMUNITY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Supreme court; Skepticism; Qualified immunity; Sovereign immunity; Law; Political science; Crown (dentistry); Philosophy; Medicine; Epistemology","score_opus":0.056661407719705084,"score_gpt":0.3059521306292208,"score_spread":0.2492907229095157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1508717189","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06783114,0.0006301317,0.1408098,0.0041492786,0.0015687589,0.0014061182,0.00062479306,0.0003874524,0.78259254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99575293,0.00013048372,0.0029285422,0.0002764228,0.00014705335,0.00008984031,0.00007780236,0.000008360694,0.00058858335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752283,0.00013527779,0.0006567015,0.00038708784,0.000617497,0.000680619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827063,0.00014867824,0.00024406683,0.0004459415,0.0005807704,0.00030989235],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006960852,0.00023428511,0.00030734375,0.00016456729,0.0021352808,0.0000638941,0.00058810716,0.00026344936,0.0017561016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004903982,0.0002380816,0.00024966925,0.00040456795,0.01206676,0.0007657953,0.00018944418,0.0003217385,0.00033445252],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006685427,0.000297765,0.018946525,0.000014582021,0.000050007322,0.0000032035325,0.00067828904,0.000045992845,0.0004909121,0.9767717,0.002020052,0.0006141046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023511085,0.00015668354,0.0383194,0.00032656558,0.00019839662,0.000075499556,0.009745431,0.00050039066,0.0032166028,0.12891528,0.81502885,0.0011658092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022948203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001201494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9279218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021832906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019088446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1508932541","doi":"10.21991/c96q2t","title":"BEYOND ANDREWS: SUBSTANTIVE EQUALITY AND POSITIVE OBLIGATIONS AFTER ELDRIDGE AND VRIEND","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Disadvantaged; Disadvantage; Duty; Law; Political science; High Court; Section (typography); Law and economics; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.03609435680499443,"score_gpt":0.2900341658805447,"score_spread":0.25393980907555025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1508932541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6271491,0.0066512846,0.015572994,0.012144995,0.0018422301,0.002179117,0.0020796855,0.0003894736,0.33199114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99669415,0.00043248694,0.001440209,0.00078496,0.00011619919,0.00010827862,0.00005299368,0.000007036689,0.00036369442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99761254,0.00017993983,0.00043954674,0.0005745681,0.0004697801,0.0007236488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856436,0.00025063276,0.00016520481,0.00016093679,0.00049023563,0.00036864934],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048823107,0.00032110116,0.0003508791,0.000119027354,0.003649558,0.00015174938,0.00017048915,0.00023702683,0.00024707182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000516413,0.00029241428,0.000117562275,0.00033671787,0.017412549,0.0012581289,0.00022779402,0.00026940956,0.00005515503],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007337377,0.00007134641,0.0806732,0.000008935357,0.00010338849,0.000016901951,0.008118012,0.0000010541448,0.00003888364,0.9098132,0.0004667162,0.0006149713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0049271034,0.00030270664,0.48458895,0.00053356535,0.0005877404,0.00024837424,0.12640236,0.00010204903,0.0010369672,0.26678813,0.11164817,0.00283389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024102547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004457089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6430251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024762168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051461597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1509468823","doi":"10.21991/c9hm2k","title":"The Governor General’s Decision to Prorogue Parliament: A Chronology & Assessment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Constitution; Parallels; Politics; Political science; Law; Constitutional crisis; Representation (politics); Subject (documents); Action (physics); Government (linguistics); History; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.03866494258941048,"score_gpt":0.3167969669847738,"score_spread":0.2781320243953633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1509468823","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027595552,0.0017020433,0.2223495,0.14446236,0.00849894,0.0036089406,0.0019879786,0.0004028625,0.5893918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97648436,0.00028117234,0.0067601274,0.0070464504,0.00045846234,0.0003681773,0.000033956756,0.00001320147,0.008554066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99686575,0.00013491866,0.00053261546,0.000542406,0.0007275274,0.001196773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980733,0.00029194276,0.00021161148,0.0005172501,0.0003299832,0.0005759561],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007476138,0.00028082248,0.0002629911,0.00013175585,0.0045707743,0.00018301739,0.0007670739,0.000216724,0.0005401179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010348393,0.00023828878,0.00017680178,0.0005437035,0.006252348,0.0004927529,0.00021007162,0.00028686284,0.0008451486],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052778825,0.00006388665,0.0053350786,0.000002502886,0.00004294642,0.000011177601,0.00039060757,0.00004888008,0.000026991922,0.8596983,0.12969932,0.0046275104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005397246,0.000047790603,0.0033803838,0.000060483617,0.000022661903,0.000039464885,0.0007067701,0.000032923024,0.00003629222,0.04219939,0.9526071,0.00032699236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022380233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2010487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94888884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012169754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005463095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510074182","doi":"10.21991/c99d4d","title":"L’activisme judiciaire, le prix de la transaction démocratique en Espagne","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01163452758851118,"score_gpt":0.264678791920187,"score_spread":0.2530442643316758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1510074182","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042976714,0.0071853343,0.4440222,0.07809128,0.0056366962,0.000780513,0.0002872945,0.00036482242,0.45933416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98738116,0.0020780829,0.0020142535,0.0029989295,0.0017678967,0.0002156319,0.000082536186,0.00003117227,0.0034303488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932764,0.0016654133,0.0010423402,0.001044474,0.0011267251,0.0018446532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961366,0.0017914287,0.00042072893,0.0004128985,0.00055167143,0.0006866605],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025560658,0.00080563466,0.0008767798,0.00034259498,0.006075377,0.00030883533,0.0006771712,0.0010957252,0.0006227645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015209004,0.0009118995,0.00065258465,0.0010955768,0.03504405,0.00179922,0.00017958197,0.001162255,0.0007151653],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011106275,0.0006522707,0.0053507444,0.00005306597,0.00033063928,0.000045533096,0.000651334,0.002677514,0.00032772194,0.96606505,0.008667724,0.015067326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015505182,0.00012843274,0.001715384,0.00045371943,0.00023467423,0.00035341288,0.003029122,0.0011783721,0.00031014564,0.34019986,0.64996266,0.00088366534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008459282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003034736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9830835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014779025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008731722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99933314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1513173581","doi":"10.21991/c9dm31","title":"Insite: Site and Sight","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Jurisdiction; Sight; Law; Political science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.027761494307644824,"score_gpt":0.29261908705758033,"score_spread":0.2648575927499355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1513173581","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28171247,0.021411093,0.01871192,0.049563903,0.008443302,0.0023591097,0.00048997346,0.0011061914,0.61620206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954056,0.00040281747,0.0011683791,0.0012007897,0.0005934498,0.00006657717,0.00004995437,0.000007717945,0.0011047141],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973239,0.00017566778,0.00038561545,0.00036574874,0.0006142715,0.0011348241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985304,0.00031932347,0.00013886484,0.00017789574,0.00029231398,0.0005412254],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066358707,0.00030164726,0.00032088577,0.00011523984,0.005506269,0.00015180213,0.00020712138,0.00024467954,0.00038515692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010434219,0.0002683029,0.00014977808,0.00036543887,0.010782416,0.0016630978,0.00023170968,0.00033097074,0.00053887797],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014385564,0.00007091799,0.14961177,0.000008758948,0.00005295873,0.000003978166,0.0020140188,0.000013601846,0.00015828507,0.84228337,0.0049315295,0.00083642645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007763642,0.00002082185,0.013368473,0.000065998734,0.000067913425,0.000055276247,0.011281334,0.000030246498,0.00011144641,0.0036423,0.97003305,0.0005468039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010391965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009368649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9651015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039607924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000485828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1513458610","doi":"10.21991/c9wd4p","title":"THE CASE OF THE MISSING RECORDS: R. V. CAROSELLA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"New Zealand Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Missing data; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.048323289153249266,"score_gpt":0.22078767185325754,"score_spread":0.17246438270000827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1513458610","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09379109,0.011421245,0.018380256,0.009807625,0.009090159,0.00096452294,0.0009956182,0.00010941785,0.8554401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977977,0.0002752084,0.00026384206,0.00042842457,0.00010113057,0.000036035734,0.000005079571,0.00000831385,0.0010842533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982785,0.000027816943,0.0008260924,0.0003342048,0.000044164328,0.0004892246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877596,0.00014351791,0.00047935892,0.00041261633,0.00009519213,0.00009333248],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004968348,0.00020589013,0.00035872657,0.0000696105,0.0027910536,0.000053941996,0.0003900981,0.00012426575,0.00018290615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003044967,0.00015123216,0.0003154461,0.0002202637,0.0048395777,0.00023841392,0.0001954221,0.00020230588,0.00017634619],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018703711,0.00003895739,0.07152944,0.00000743255,0.00010117669,0.000014540531,0.00023371603,0.00002256205,0.000002197188,0.92304915,0.0040063546,0.00097574265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010830477,0.000045069453,0.006475418,0.00006558557,0.00003993306,0.0008969867,0.004277478,0.00033394148,0.0001914051,0.6764622,0.30963817,0.00049081456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013100803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00089938304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9040066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015560086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002564855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1515353485","doi":"10.21991/c9xm29","title":"Judges and Religious-Based Reasoning","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Legislature; Political science; Context (archaeology); Law; Democracy; Public reason; Establishment Clause; Set (abstract data type); Politics; Sociology; First amendment; Supreme court; Computer science","score_opus":0.01799064162263306,"score_gpt":0.29063592258352516,"score_spread":0.2726452809608921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1515353485","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01857104,0.008457249,0.087025516,0.021648891,0.0031614143,0.0008512156,0.00037029284,0.00065284857,0.8592615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98955256,0.00022373944,0.004518528,0.0042866236,0.00063447026,0.00006394155,0.00009403743,0.000012161057,0.00061393145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99691683,0.00017549978,0.00045533304,0.0004056312,0.00067601923,0.001370714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99794716,0.000457875,0.00018267533,0.00028471663,0.00031691004,0.0008106819],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076028286,0.00033087496,0.0003381361,0.00022517273,0.003334372,0.00014229285,0.00027933164,0.00025474292,0.00036614563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011469801,0.0003429129,0.00017281895,0.00040701454,0.018165123,0.0009837967,0.000115421404,0.00030981528,0.00022598947],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022327835,0.000087906694,0.13635847,0.000009328752,0.00003365783,0.0000068186823,0.00014784161,0.00009339344,0.000019277948,0.8562703,0.0065165376,0.00043411707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006667962,0.000029813245,0.001185889,0.0000902979,0.00006984589,0.00011071628,0.0032188804,0.0000793905,0.000055553177,0.005743409,0.9882131,0.00053631526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007358734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026219024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98169655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040203452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052315285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1515451775","doi":"10.21991/c9h960","title":"CANADA AFTER MEECH","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Caribbean history, culture, and politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.024754522402797095,"score_gpt":0.23951390487283541,"score_spread":0.2147593824700383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1515451775","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042112605,0.0012198429,0.00766188,0.003123831,0.005746584,0.00053270377,0.0006902799,0.00021834052,0.9765953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898209,0.00004893997,0.0008201527,0.0042769443,0.0003809355,0.00008180211,0.000061859224,0.000009920822,0.0044985437],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99731314,0.00010226697,0.00043438264,0.00042374147,0.0007305576,0.0009958984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985051,0.00008720389,0.0001262047,0.00032915967,0.00043201735,0.0005202987],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029026114,0.00028833403,0.00028122173,0.00012509078,0.002116862,0.00006327688,0.00041236766,0.00023791319,0.0023760695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034465635,0.00029750273,0.00019320141,0.00030730042,0.0071890606,0.00049384695,0.0000836141,0.00028580686,0.00023816069],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003928211,0.00005866365,0.010827955,0.000006386698,0.000043207532,0.000079839054,0.0007602093,0.0000075543035,0.000005002147,0.9219247,0.066037185,0.0002099964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004487025,0.000021839063,0.00084336515,0.000043805274,0.000053039024,0.000060862745,0.0057247328,0.0000070622186,0.00008171339,0.01723824,0.97502726,0.00044935706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.50057966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86689746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98560965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001152628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016969755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516154490","doi":"10.21991/c9jw99","title":"Reference re Supreme Court Act, ss 5 and 6 — Expanding the Constitution of Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Constitution; Political science; Original jurisdiction; Remand (court procedure); Majority opinion; Economic Justice; Certiorari; Court of equity; Precedent; Concurring opinion","score_opus":0.0322041707836593,"score_gpt":0.2834642513646748,"score_spread":0.2512600805810155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516154490","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10799533,0.003028192,0.020242402,0.08674172,0.0070927194,0.0024798159,0.000615598,0.00036479265,0.77143943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99781245,0.00020380995,0.00032675458,0.00076783664,0.00018320399,0.000054622207,0.000036257854,0.000005021664,0.00061004155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970338,0.00024783338,0.0005709598,0.00044018458,0.0009099318,0.0007972992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99782175,0.00074229675,0.0003066295,0.0002762478,0.0005869298,0.00026613974],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097635295,0.00030344693,0.0004107427,0.000071030125,0.0052807764,0.00011220135,0.00043341797,0.00019138,0.00016012117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022158397,0.00022821732,0.00010529892,0.0003280251,0.014858304,0.0005698425,0.00021092477,0.0003377541,0.000013647395],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002748342,0.000025236188,0.022257699,0.000020302265,0.00006483485,0.000003002715,0.00056492566,0.00020225611,0.0001754827,0.96533704,0.010838007,0.0004837158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001310332,0.000054444994,0.0065343827,0.00029706585,0.00011568971,0.000050204562,0.025495503,0.00031761537,0.0005412377,0.011950293,0.95265365,0.00067956443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16080156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4617076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9533868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059320807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003322865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99601424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518267020","doi":"10.21991/c9sw9g","title":"CONSTRUCTING CANADIAN IDENTITIES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology; Genealogy; History","score_opus":0.029199811944035495,"score_gpt":0.23034248163721505,"score_spread":0.20114266969317957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1518267020","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020837137,0.00069459213,0.004274094,0.0026584608,0.004354029,0.0003740982,0.00044976952,0.00022380342,0.9848874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98902404,0.00012388738,0.0010139442,0.0011958766,0.00025986598,0.000043178658,0.000068751644,0.000010595501,0.008259837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99750185,0.000093449155,0.00042856464,0.00041532505,0.00048244573,0.0010783441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826556,0.00006757798,0.00013714915,0.00027689096,0.0003598508,0.000892952],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044467527,0.00021090022,0.00025193195,0.001255513,0.0068725357,0.0004683492,0.00047227147,0.00025521457,0.0074353055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054349547,0.00029508804,0.00020570749,0.0005421129,0.020339984,0.0011766871,0.00006320307,0.00029203584,0.0012922906],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008205373,0.000021868043,0.013501476,0.0000066253942,0.000040458304,0.000083565494,0.0011038327,0.000003331924,0.000003843139,0.9593723,0.02427584,0.0015786919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040966278,0.000014702673,0.0004398551,0.000062464205,0.000043338212,0.00016213596,0.02253933,0.00001016079,0.000017972658,0.05025443,0.9255907,0.00045522818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8837385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9929378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9869403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030001788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016314061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1519800358","doi":"10.21991/c9k37x","title":"CUSTOMS CENSORSHIP AND THE CHARTER: THE LITTLE SISTERS CASE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Business Law and Ethics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Censorship; Charter; Political science; Law; History","score_opus":0.042444995753292226,"score_gpt":0.21506359083402618,"score_spread":0.17261859508073396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1519800358","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.069999054,0.003533386,0.04459336,0.12631032,0.009839894,0.00319627,0.00017261802,0.0008865499,0.74146855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98673594,0.000035985035,0.0001016537,0.012162079,0.0005619674,0.00010429906,0.000032374206,0.0000142096505,0.00025149196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981129,0.000044248998,0.0004602271,0.00041835106,0.00035185058,0.0006123989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862623,0.00025181205,0.00024110675,0.00048146333,0.00035584677,0.000043510252],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091344316,0.00034275334,0.00029542137,0.00014635101,0.0029887964,0.00038676432,0.00041726453,0.00017714525,0.00031343687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040986328,0.0002018644,0.0001981297,0.00043067432,0.0130367745,0.0013530784,0.00029275217,0.00043840666,0.00045256008],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016185103,0.00004870871,0.0049060034,0.000047603335,0.000065127446,0.00015693817,0.00011142912,0.000030701063,0.0000070916376,0.9902265,0.0034569642,0.0007810577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006027129,0.000017971051,0.0019042093,0.00022953401,0.000539787,0.0067875157,0.0062762946,0.0038883504,0.000051665036,0.18837732,0.78483856,0.0010616508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001024465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00053167244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9167369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004139556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021136862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1522642859","doi":"10.21991/c9d093","title":"Canada’s Native Languages: The Right of First Nations to Educate Their Children in Their Own Languages","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biculturalism; Immigration; Neuroscience of multilingualism; Linguistics; First language; Political science; Sociology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011791186173491792,"score_gpt":0.23066307870612818,"score_spread":0.2188718925326364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1522642859","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040293027,0.0023178807,0.0011794106,0.034020536,0.001769028,0.0016402623,0.003343105,0.000097360986,0.9153394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996622,0.000100913676,0.0000895614,0.0011878691,0.00011874658,0.00008236252,0.00006112619,0.0000065512336,0.0017308344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983078,0.00010964599,0.00037733678,0.00030476507,0.00037225595,0.00052815996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877065,0.0003132844,0.00014910106,0.00028672264,0.00025656205,0.00022365557],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039314522,0.0001856555,0.00024254138,0.00064683525,0.0031378001,0.00008344871,0.00059394166,0.00011026142,0.0009701756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008193553,0.000161451,0.00012365711,0.0008046064,0.005458789,0.0003273316,0.00009203232,0.00022222851,0.000039491475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012538548,0.000075358046,0.01161104,0.0000066646035,0.000051057235,0.000009464395,0.0060924767,0.00005958173,0.000005896598,0.95980674,0.021973021,0.00029614082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042105673,0.000022226586,0.020474788,0.00016748645,0.00002641084,0.000031213138,0.04114823,0.0000069574785,0.0001581108,0.004157509,0.933021,0.00036499745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9625044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99965787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.956329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013382265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013849419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1523422130","doi":"10.21991/c9xw9q","title":"LA JUDICIARISATION DE LA POLITIQUE, LES DROITS DES MINORITES ET LE NATIONALISME CANADIEN*","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023436174379214053,"score_gpt":0.25673772874064077,"score_spread":0.23330155436142672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1523422130","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019127157,0.011984902,0.015059904,0.014680267,0.0024858094,0.00041362565,0.0013001051,0.00016629699,0.9347819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98510754,0.0014835397,0.0021215314,0.0011649536,0.00032089584,0.00007453241,0.00015029503,0.000019348317,0.009557359],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99642235,0.00081578677,0.0005786342,0.00053880713,0.0005601078,0.0010843176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976986,0.0006089298,0.00026392468,0.0002411168,0.0005242119,0.00066319585],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015618515,0.00034646908,0.00034127716,0.0008193763,0.0053318776,0.0004468935,0.00044008184,0.0007581777,0.0018493285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011582703,0.0005069186,0.00029847652,0.00070962356,0.048521064,0.0016138001,0.000099173194,0.0006280813,0.00022662804],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022308222,0.00027384286,0.014713172,0.000056343015,0.00011344834,0.00012924332,0.003769765,0.000116964606,0.00002001535,0.9624186,0.014880568,0.0034857371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006197273,0.0000317577,0.009943078,0.00026586882,0.00009824706,0.00050941255,0.0068652863,0.00007977113,0.000021873908,0.28490096,0.6961936,0.00047046322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8001591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86496323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9659804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039948793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019985186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1524138988","doi":"10.21991/c9t674","title":"LA NATION, C’EST MOI: THE ENCOUNTER OF QUÉBEC AND ABORIGINAL NATIONALISMS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Referendum; Opposition (politics); Government (linguistics); Independence (probability theory); Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Ethnology; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01746300848833261,"score_gpt":0.2458057936903934,"score_spread":0.2283427852020608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1524138988","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017447382,0.0028163472,0.012480363,0.012997729,0.0020736617,0.00061994983,0.00046023817,0.00011645412,0.9509879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997297,0.00023557198,0.0002474959,0.0005487883,0.000117184776,0.000038649374,0.000018806786,0.000004502769,0.0014920039],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853456,0.000111120346,0.00032877427,0.00023874741,0.00048170838,0.00030510564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988699,0.00021768548,0.0001603591,0.00016614095,0.00043112488,0.00015479494],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060363574,0.00012820531,0.00015717463,0.00034629836,0.0025985474,0.0001387516,0.0002951886,0.00014424238,0.00097540574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000349444,0.00012704184,0.000101572645,0.0003142548,0.020991718,0.00060778006,0.000039672297,0.00018751249,0.00007379141],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017906188,0.000049600872,0.0069739907,0.000008164779,0.000035319412,0.000006692859,0.0026189084,0.000011141758,0.000016431879,0.9830245,0.006496557,0.00074083667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035147226,0.000014619336,0.002673809,0.00004252319,0.0000371568,0.000059814654,0.004452807,0.000019209729,0.000014088892,0.028005656,0.96416044,0.00016837864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3666102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7814757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97984964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053009856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009240243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1524557742","doi":"10.21991/c9bt0b","title":"ABORIGINAL PEOPLES AND NAFTA: COLONIZATION CONTINUES TO RUN AMOK","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Colonization; Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01918210134228057,"score_gpt":0.2837901237154985,"score_spread":0.26460802237321795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1524557742","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17421448,0.00062235224,0.07343462,0.016560031,0.004827377,0.0014794377,0.0002713196,0.000488238,0.72810215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99114084,0.0002157373,0.0042663203,0.0013726479,0.00021653586,0.00008405284,0.000073600335,0.000007953835,0.0026222852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980011,0.000067910456,0.00038874455,0.00041612398,0.000536856,0.00058924843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987412,0.00012989539,0.00012401368,0.00012996301,0.00056175643,0.00031318376],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003992174,0.00023077147,0.00022828107,0.00027378157,0.0019019723,0.00014841018,0.00029555956,0.00015614403,0.00068286783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040272035,0.00024033707,0.00007968708,0.00039638684,0.0034864515,0.0008244171,0.00006987634,0.00014128255,0.0003265334],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056804296,0.000061442435,0.07383641,0.0000065125464,0.000038527072,0.0000144607075,0.0023047184,0.000009921075,0.00008812346,0.9179666,0.005329797,0.00028667168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012851222,0.000108145636,0.028446773,0.00025265833,0.000059548634,0.000087029046,0.008498224,0.00006282607,0.00082279113,0.054861367,0.9046624,0.0008531256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000741589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039100177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8993326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022537417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001887729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1524833258","doi":"10.21991/c93h36","title":"Charter Checks and Parliamentary Balances","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Separation of powers; Orthodoxy; Law; Law and economics; Oxymoron; Power (physics); Democracy; Enumerated powers; Dictatorship; Political science; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0396831487486355,"score_gpt":0.26670781022178597,"score_spread":0.22702466147315048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1524833258","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032295313,0.0052858153,0.015276236,0.01154411,0.0036586102,0.0009938108,0.00033368677,0.00048488274,0.93012756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950345,0.0008021188,0.0009994215,0.0023122665,0.0003473509,0.000109869026,0.000033599757,0.0000070507635,0.00035382027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99748755,0.00009373722,0.00045737482,0.00054105604,0.0005758639,0.0008444266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989291,0.00011079855,0.00014589739,0.00019635854,0.00026245925,0.0003554074],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042346856,0.00031705262,0.0003496221,0.00016803991,0.0036273734,0.00009330581,0.00031733743,0.00019351559,0.001011637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022882104,0.00030472694,0.00015756112,0.00030901676,0.017432924,0.00090704585,0.00018634595,0.00024208809,0.00029692324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047963524,0.00010130075,0.09176501,0.0000055403193,0.00009495774,0.000026070056,0.0008353,0.0000018962482,0.00003754496,0.90184647,0.002925151,0.002312798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016288158,0.00011730297,0.016131861,0.0002072748,0.00014865624,0.00015575945,0.029036269,0.000034631368,0.00026142946,0.3167694,0.63441044,0.0010981461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046738256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003295446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96273917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018104078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001146421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W152532952","doi":"10.21991/c9pd56","title":"FROM “INDIANS” TO “FIRST NATIONS”: CHANGING ANGLO-CANADIAN PERCEPTIONS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN INDIAN IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY*","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Constitution; Treaty; Nationalism; Federalism; Political science; Section (typography); Gender studies; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.014066612821296062,"score_gpt":0.22354149368159773,"score_spread":0.20947488086030167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W152532952","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6101165,0.00050138624,0.002299549,0.040719897,0.006432065,0.002986356,0.0048591825,0.00012357086,0.33196154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971313,0.0001054177,0.00023130835,0.0019021884,0.00018508788,0.000100276535,0.00007520921,0.000006963071,0.000262255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774164,0.00016877947,0.00039180793,0.00034554573,0.0005449122,0.0008073087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986874,0.00015255368,0.00016768968,0.00041087373,0.00018889281,0.0003926051],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004229448,0.00017686469,0.00021595425,0.0016761732,0.0065704756,0.00017949678,0.00091134466,0.00010239704,0.0006744941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005445377,0.00016743141,0.00020637903,0.0030507958,0.00935145,0.00043010534,0.00008554067,0.00029690363,0.00021669282],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000765137,0.00006492324,0.1767356,0.0000049894943,0.000024605082,0.000014445191,0.029880019,0.00006634365,0.000002137784,0.7889173,0.0036673797,0.0006146376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032152724,0.000023304126,0.19948429,0.00011767824,0.00004440136,0.0000149295365,0.09051343,0.000008031103,0.000002421182,0.0018455049,0.7072965,0.00032797828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8539708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99895424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78707176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001391597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054813363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99472284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526342888","doi":"10.21991/c9r67h","title":"Charkaoui: Beyond Anti-Terrorism, Procedural Fairness, and Section 7 of the Charter","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Terrorism; Political science; Law; Immigration; Government (linguistics); Section (typography); Refugee; Business","score_opus":0.03484792083386847,"score_gpt":0.2658367904835917,"score_spread":0.23098886964972323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526342888","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6028938,0.0015556791,0.013016182,0.029970406,0.010483751,0.0022490984,0.00027481007,0.00033100508,0.33922526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983885,0.00008954191,0.00018043742,0.0006312063,0.00020585494,0.00004355522,0.000007979248,0.0000058883566,0.00044702995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981439,0.00008958921,0.00040354155,0.00035943292,0.000490369,0.00051314844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990008,0.000066856286,0.00021261384,0.00024389414,0.00031316574,0.00016268992],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041383773,0.00020904826,0.00024826557,0.000103672275,0.0019899132,0.000054149863,0.00034900312,0.00018369127,0.00027288272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002771998,0.00016637311,0.0001578606,0.00033718217,0.009965986,0.0009039913,0.00015112339,0.00021998744,0.000030410592],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033728298,0.00007104592,0.06196468,0.000030649026,0.000026140726,0.0000036103866,0.0014148267,0.0000049067926,0.00045793774,0.9327063,0.002890798,0.00039536742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003589387,0.0003411913,0.14739227,0.0014320841,0.00055326376,0.00096701016,0.05587777,0.00031989772,0.010022477,0.1809461,0.5963042,0.0022543622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00087730924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010499896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7517602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000103896564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010692738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99930936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1527938502","doi":"10.21991/c9538k","title":"Applying the Burden of Proof and Creating Connections to Communities","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Burden of proof; Arbitrariness; Proof of concept; Epistemology; Law and economics; Sociology; Economic Justice; Computer science; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04185386996911755,"score_gpt":0.2998754247963839,"score_spread":0.25802155482726635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1527938502","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.100759424,0.009943607,0.06113795,0.04472684,0.0049528754,0.006498872,0.0005328749,0.00040665007,0.7710409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99683243,0.000113083086,0.00061791606,0.0007591614,0.00067621697,0.0008141868,0.000017629896,0.0000059528757,0.00016344497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978933,0.00017005755,0.0004603951,0.00019103894,0.0005535825,0.0007316365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821055,0.0007139716,0.00016436282,0.00021984363,0.00041865176,0.00027262713],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008855522,0.0002253084,0.0003094943,0.00016976932,0.0073832665,0.00008431898,0.00032462482,0.000118907206,0.00013196433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00064344774,0.00018440791,0.00012535154,0.0005286354,0.012279447,0.0006162887,0.00029824712,0.00023949835,0.00004519709],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021384525,0.00005825607,0.029138586,0.000009287357,0.00008281232,5.090786e-7,0.0058981515,0.0005760577,0.00009492367,0.9616178,0.0010976446,0.0014045596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051962864,0.000050958024,0.00093300926,0.00026936922,0.00011720613,0.000076191376,0.26112056,0.0001262729,0.00020586743,0.026809283,0.70931315,0.00045850844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016612332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003440941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93480855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015952597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083510706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.993909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1528129522","doi":"10.21991/c9w37q","title":"CANADIAN MULTICULTURALISM IN HISTORICAL AND COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE: IS CANADA UNIQUE?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Diversity (politics); Perspective (graphical); Cultural diversity; Ethnic group; Sociology; Political science; Law; Gender studies","score_opus":0.052979621379145,"score_gpt":0.2848957647658698,"score_spread":0.2319161433867248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1528129522","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017620483,0.0017028307,0.0009632187,0.03310125,0.0018235695,0.00078826555,0.0006718108,0.000095894415,0.94323266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933272,0.00008176294,0.00089462934,0.0033156653,0.00010189097,0.000043822838,0.000029757995,0.000004508106,0.0022007392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99753356,0.00014490688,0.0004264133,0.0004780583,0.00046749608,0.00094957364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981694,0.00016815227,0.00011486654,0.00017845012,0.00054857734,0.0008205474],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023543957,0.00028992945,0.0003715493,0.0002461724,0.0018615482,0.00005310967,0.00029020422,0.00019222482,0.0005178096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030652483,0.00029698815,0.00008478068,0.00043766422,0.0065894597,0.00049644825,0.00006447278,0.00034920167,0.000029600793],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018394267,0.000043284832,0.025663067,0.0000033315182,0.000032936536,0.00007452747,0.0023540335,0.000013797636,0.0000047886556,0.95935786,0.012396509,0.00003748229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006142519,0.000025750418,0.0032498194,0.00005955247,0.000030037634,0.00009499403,0.031014688,0.000038907387,0.0000375002,0.008533566,0.9557516,0.000549308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99586445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97570676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008587449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033515967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1530969327","doi":"10.21991/c90q1k","title":"Invalidity and Retrospectivity under the Irish and Canadian Constitutions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Irish; Legislation; Law; Statute; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Computer science","score_opus":0.06189011535806788,"score_gpt":0.28688165926465836,"score_spread":0.22499154390659049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1530969327","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050873015,0.0014582903,0.05154592,0.05334912,0.0014830258,0.001742279,0.0011345483,0.00032029607,0.8380935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99646825,0.00027781242,0.00061982276,0.002032306,0.00012954866,0.000096660835,0.000030395347,0.000006328232,0.000338894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980251,0.0001270007,0.0003212119,0.00047165554,0.00032918548,0.00072580087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984937,0.00019196265,0.00011077777,0.00032983941,0.00025823855,0.0006154927],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000708128,0.00023227514,0.00021633344,0.00014882229,0.0074128504,0.00022055986,0.00031845245,0.00020967227,0.00036258908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003571183,0.00019799228,0.000088247696,0.00040468277,0.020469077,0.00070652046,0.00016841434,0.00036882612,0.00008124388],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006642858,0.000037622147,0.045001544,0.0000033983167,0.000033331577,0.0000056720555,0.00039407337,0.000013751262,0.000013838318,0.9498583,0.0043853717,0.00024644172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006963786,0.00003106363,0.03730066,0.000052171814,0.000093180126,0.00020390101,0.011330622,0.00012792005,0.000054481985,0.18290517,0.76663685,0.0005675789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12770605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32116416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9455952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035088725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036332707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9938794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1531815374","doi":"10.21991/c9t95d","title":"WALDMAN V. CANADA: RELIGOUS DISCRIMINATION IN THE CONSTITITUON","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.03496752046064982,"score_gpt":0.266479316802001,"score_spread":0.23151179634135116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1531815374","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008162913,0.00066396134,0.012237953,0.01346468,0.0023888985,0.0009300808,0.00030146466,0.0001390802,0.961711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992634,0.00011743002,0.0005598703,0.005315384,0.00024582833,0.00012978881,0.00011974598,0.000008999719,0.00086893456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962727,0.00027271648,0.0007041568,0.00054587476,0.0010748493,0.0011297148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826825,0.00037744414,0.00022263685,0.00045654722,0.00037889605,0.0002962318],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091526133,0.0003474978,0.0003369283,0.00022789119,0.0027166205,0.00010577699,0.00095062103,0.00020396871,0.00053448364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008368415,0.00029896997,0.00016032897,0.00070997485,0.014399797,0.0006999299,0.00011476084,0.00046291683,0.000094644856],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030619314,0.00014166794,0.028153582,0.000008606146,0.000026222911,0.00014304167,0.00091224373,0.000057599103,0.0000041147587,0.9607446,0.009454561,0.00032314498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008167291,0.000050465966,0.004245699,0.00012239287,0.00006786542,0.00024563711,0.026070446,0.000043636723,0.00003148663,0.044256818,0.92340684,0.0006419624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.57393014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8324943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9844711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009889508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01963295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1532977085","doi":"10.21991/c99663","title":"SOVIET CONSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENTS: ALEXANDER M. IAKOVLEVEV IN CONVERSATION WITH L.C. GREEN","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Scientific Research and Philosophical Inquiry","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.07384744291897405,"score_gpt":0.26739272532246344,"score_spread":0.1935452824034894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1532977085","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018401972,0.00028122973,0.86652005,0.006353544,0.0015340896,0.00087272667,0.00010086199,0.00029137763,0.12220595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97358066,0.000027628354,0.023986207,0.0017126142,0.00008412017,0.0001675252,0.00012909807,0.00000840617,0.00030371346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99550223,0.00014225786,0.00081488723,0.0011300107,0.0012227447,0.0011878671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99774194,0.0001829723,0.00021655804,0.00071963,0.0006123235,0.00052656984],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080799893,0.0004667564,0.00041969985,0.0007220195,0.00087490526,0.00021684788,0.0013315714,0.00025538984,0.00076511205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023389806,0.00040416166,0.00015121783,0.0014125957,0.012684656,0.002714004,0.00046325286,0.00052463484,0.0005771571],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012777101,0.00026696123,0.03280454,0.000019943203,0.00007659209,0.00018587477,0.0002510258,0.00018671698,0.000086898996,0.9625507,0.0022531378,0.0011898627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.018206552,0.0008817197,0.032328203,0.0012840336,0.000098350676,0.0040387786,0.00279229,0.022242382,0.0045583043,0.7910735,0.117857,0.0046388633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017568065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018933158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9717405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031268413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038894324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1533649643","doi":"10.21991/c9n65t","title":"THE FEDERAL ELECTORAL REGIME CONFRONTS THE CHARTER ... AGAIN: A COMMENT ON SOMERVILLE V. CANADA (A.G.)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.025046527575498183,"score_gpt":0.21088040081637544,"score_spread":0.18583387324087725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1533649643","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011628494,0.0010792804,0.0049026962,0.18662813,0.009299713,0.0019931204,0.00013341811,0.0004211256,0.783914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94016874,0.000010969837,0.000031073087,0.05796746,0.00056184374,0.00012369122,0.000090814334,0.00001373107,0.0010317032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976391,0.000036615398,0.00049754744,0.00040391527,0.000634296,0.0007885317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986339,0.00012800597,0.00034923837,0.000486461,0.00034318984,0.000059180333],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033278024,0.00036956297,0.00025344224,0.00010508243,0.003970687,0.0004496672,0.00063656614,0.000097629505,0.0006108172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021740007,0.00023009055,0.00016543358,0.0002978244,0.0022481966,0.00076959253,0.00020012807,0.00036173032,0.00056915014],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009208831,0.00006173969,0.007544042,0.0000072786465,0.00006320951,0.000015093755,0.000021839933,0.000054356777,0.000010828681,0.77757657,0.21413091,0.00042203447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089484616,0.000020310854,0.0026844621,0.00005796592,0.000032943513,0.000023708695,0.0011278975,0.00077039655,0.0000767125,0.0064121466,0.98754036,0.00035821812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16903116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23935789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9285402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024380806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009260218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1535369152","doi":"10.21991/c9c09s","title":"The Constitution Act, 1982: the Foreseen and Unforeseen","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Writ; Law; Delegation; Political science; Repatriation; Economic Justice; Prime minister; Work (physics); Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.03976722809875146,"score_gpt":0.2728279921872436,"score_spread":0.2330607640884921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1535369152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005049206,0.007267762,0.016596861,0.03343678,0.0036272812,0.001858068,0.0003279963,0.00039386333,0.9314422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99530584,0.0015920283,0.00023695901,0.0014331857,0.00042094843,0.00024437415,0.00003354699,0.000008520251,0.00072462513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962451,0.00026501808,0.00068387325,0.0005665976,0.0009851486,0.0012542887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99747634,0.0008364984,0.00027049688,0.00045892198,0.00059662026,0.00036110336],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001444336,0.00041693353,0.000349128,0.00013831367,0.018567923,0.00032681695,0.0008967832,0.00025015374,0.00019262449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015614365,0.00026541285,0.0002539703,0.0006371615,0.054442737,0.0009190786,0.00043115538,0.0005039783,0.00019571256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102810365,0.000056073077,0.02931653,0.0000039683873,0.00015118251,0.000016405835,0.00070939626,0.000015541658,0.000008399201,0.959087,0.0068166014,0.00371608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063708896,0.000046906316,0.0046918103,0.0000671873,0.00009448299,0.00011509827,0.009729602,0.000053446616,0.000043139687,0.26162323,0.7224899,0.00040813786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069980766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015334518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9902566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028362885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028897831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1536077555","doi":"10.21991/c9gm28","title":"THE CANADA CLAUSE THAT WAS: HOW COURTS USE INTERPRETIVE CLAUSES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dependent clause; Establishment Clause; Non-finite clause; Linguistics; Law; Political science; First amendment; Supreme court; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03478920550353464,"score_gpt":0.21050006559354728,"score_spread":0.17571086009001263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1536077555","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02987964,0.0006792453,0.040537346,0.043728847,0.01632082,0.002707164,0.0004990211,0.0007025657,0.86494535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9664846,0.00003305885,0.0002263217,0.031382777,0.00036947135,0.00015196291,0.00014452492,0.000016477117,0.0011908276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99765384,0.000025663983,0.00043568073,0.00046758854,0.00073036767,0.00068685715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982584,0.00023265439,0.00036613265,0.00037634704,0.0006974476,0.00006903083],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023878276,0.00039700774,0.00024874872,0.0001824239,0.0020845043,0.0007969658,0.00059678376,0.00012133326,0.0005111262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006850808,0.00030143085,0.00018102118,0.00024725773,0.0032853496,0.003655418,0.00027521502,0.00030667926,0.0002548757],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096663876,0.00006446263,0.01748276,0.000010299601,0.00011428629,0.000034332083,0.000019237963,0.000026650485,0.000039146624,0.9070431,0.07497912,0.00008996858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006515006,0.000015585709,0.002897974,0.00014387385,0.0000719903,0.00006790726,0.0013219045,0.0014193179,0.000396647,0.028454665,0.9640333,0.00052535714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048695303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20052812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9366049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037467858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00138043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1536794624","doi":"10.21991/c9wh4q","title":"ROADBLOCKS IN THE WAY OF CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.06579481639080617,"score_gpt":0.2865437377199745,"score_spread":0.22074892132916832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1536794624","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013032325,0.0030551355,0.01014108,0.012082616,0.003000746,0.0019242583,0.00043085212,0.00019092554,0.95614207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99573666,0.00033001637,0.0007288865,0.0023467245,0.00029665238,0.00022471612,0.00006243354,0.000004916046,0.00026901433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99698746,0.0002625156,0.00063355477,0.0004146719,0.00090979063,0.0007920202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986355,0.00021800352,0.00024075873,0.00035370962,0.0003851711,0.0001668665],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012108134,0.0002821721,0.00034288983,0.000077435354,0.0018893343,0.000053497228,0.0008428386,0.00037396565,0.00090158824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041994662,0.0002209758,0.0003183431,0.0008288697,0.029293885,0.0008657892,0.00010917863,0.00044147897,0.00011832773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003733988,0.00027725054,0.040050674,0.00001277029,0.000041961775,0.000024313043,0.008758086,0.000017373077,0.000022587756,0.94590247,0.004386356,0.00046884877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020815397,0.00009573799,0.007583331,0.00031306932,0.00010308848,0.00019237002,0.06568436,0.00004663369,0.00023730705,0.15953834,0.7633281,0.00079612195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013608001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021992687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98270434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020699868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001577684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1537107893","doi":"10.21991/c91w9n","title":"L’abolition du registre des armes d’épaule : le rôle potentiel des principes non écrits","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Institutions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.014028327057731264,"score_gpt":0.2084832883972059,"score_spread":0.19445496133947462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1537107893","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046505477,0.014558955,0.44711876,0.02945885,0.01416271,0.001759828,0.0005748012,0.00067489553,0.44518572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98284245,0.00043705816,0.0019778772,0.0016180539,0.0032363078,0.0001973803,0.00067550526,0.000052566156,0.008962802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943733,0.000111137924,0.0014295279,0.0012314662,0.0008569824,0.0019975542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99618495,0.00014426121,0.000715232,0.0007877709,0.0018882636,0.0002795318],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010336153,0.0010029946,0.000899306,0.00053986337,0.0073122266,0.0013948261,0.0007890209,0.00065333216,0.0006075382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014962723,0.0010613757,0.00069513696,0.0012054242,0.017244384,0.00862561,0.00063199416,0.00065716077,0.0020139345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072585455,0.0006900336,0.049163185,0.0011115704,0.00019748387,0.000061562874,0.00005452871,0.0027356052,0.00045852287,0.90477866,0.034711417,0.0059648477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027626979,0.00006975376,0.004432489,0.0028573717,0.00032686043,0.0007038599,0.0017395734,0.008240769,0.00022887153,0.077884406,0.8994796,0.0012737336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005387083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023279001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.936337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006773678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019174541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1537497923","doi":"10.21991/c9kx1x","title":"Reforming the Upper House: Lessons from Britain","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Legitimacy; Commission; House of Representatives; White (mutation); Political science; Electoral reform; Public administration; Commons; Law; Democracy; Parliament; Politics","score_opus":0.022558044728193775,"score_gpt":0.29054297846107,"score_spread":0.26798493373287624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1537497923","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035975218,0.0021842422,0.17927797,0.1760478,0.0063234754,0.001252179,0.00090636994,0.0009411692,0.59709156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931943,0.00006911009,0.0003400666,0.0037832407,0.00094309595,0.00007449547,0.000027245655,0.000013760535,0.0015546805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996848,0.00025793086,0.0005046785,0.00048561292,0.0008229559,0.0010808636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809587,0.00066470436,0.00019632134,0.00045963493,0.00022591485,0.00035753596],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009832982,0.00026542222,0.00031824975,0.00006725079,0.0042261044,0.00022220056,0.0006833031,0.00024410654,0.00027224448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018354603,0.00020245621,0.0002461383,0.00031595383,0.008583595,0.0006615773,0.0001689407,0.0003506639,0.00071630924],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011243107,0.000040380404,0.010963116,0.0000038916073,0.000036107307,0.000004645123,0.00022146486,0.00005872909,0.000050521685,0.97885764,0.007030982,0.0027213003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049278256,0.00001483993,0.0025472527,0.00012548977,0.00002927813,0.000021307626,0.00189774,0.00022402604,0.00006224318,0.101331435,0.89293104,0.000322584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02213476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008767526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95721906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042945804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014123415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99707025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W153819658","doi":"10.21991/c97d4s","title":"THE ISRAELI CONSTITUTION AND THE FIGHT AGAINST TERRORISM","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Terrorism; Politics; Political science; Law; Democracy; State (computer science); Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.023363858370951934,"score_gpt":0.25583364359460775,"score_spread":0.23246978522365583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W153819658","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006224262,0.001745573,0.013572015,0.023072291,0.0048658266,0.0016109897,0.0001246862,0.00025250207,0.94853187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910093,0.00036495854,0.00025311092,0.003716274,0.00038144752,0.00023733202,0.000037530925,0.000006897219,0.003993127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971859,0.00028566914,0.00058171846,0.00043689134,0.0007389014,0.0007709153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980601,0.00060479157,0.0002476225,0.0003636392,0.00049496064,0.00022887849],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013183904,0.00029980144,0.00026854174,0.00011773219,0.011562356,0.00032505102,0.00069699675,0.00020591552,0.00029030672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005959577,0.0001788638,0.00023179712,0.0001650189,0.038313113,0.0007545121,0.00017558743,0.0003893705,0.00028760993],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001649087,0.00004572118,0.000847597,0.0000033834428,0.000091945134,0.0000151107,0.00075679517,0.0000123458385,0.000006078165,0.9915304,0.0057847598,0.00074091286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013812253,0.000016156906,0.00019454563,0.000051564373,0.000044119854,0.000053938995,0.001698022,0.00012952811,0.00004433911,0.37444922,0.62168944,0.00024793268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008962541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002673337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9847851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022431074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015694964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98972446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1538598330","doi":"10.21991/c9508j","title":"FIRST NATIONS AND ABORIGINAL RIGHTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Human rights; Law","score_opus":0.022297789525906803,"score_gpt":0.2816161481952896,"score_spread":0.2593183586693828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1538598330","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020043304,0.0002428936,0.02125774,0.0028453744,0.002194593,0.00052452576,0.00017660101,0.00026412692,0.9524508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99297065,0.000064977205,0.0021599303,0.00036181815,0.0002878341,0.00006654364,0.000044031243,0.0000058838814,0.0040383236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980401,0.000058869333,0.00036975744,0.0004100002,0.00054312596,0.0005781885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987386,0.0002105401,0.00012562922,0.00018010019,0.0004468831,0.00029828586],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002869908,0.00022793564,0.00019964612,0.00033773124,0.007185712,0.0001270879,0.0003315484,0.00017580496,0.0019296965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015009932,0.00021404652,0.00012217314,0.00019621236,0.00871771,0.0009761274,0.00005420825,0.0001938727,0.00041571868],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027026115,0.00010396091,0.00450248,0.00000729467,0.00004995141,0.000026277494,0.00070907234,0.000011111542,0.0000029856685,0.99334437,0.0011847025,0.00003074098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044638108,0.000023810804,0.0009454164,0.00006833304,0.000027511182,0.000055310007,0.0002685103,0.000039463688,0.000042103868,0.4494591,0.5483675,0.00025657372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025982957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032932997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97292733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022870503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012556317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99898267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1538953595","doi":"10.21991/c9q676","title":"Conditions Under Which Québec Prefers a Strong Federal Government, or Why Decentralization is not Necessarily a Good Thing for Québec","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Decentralization; Nothing; Government (linguistics); Identity (music); Work (physics); Political science; Cooperative federalism; Sociology; Law; Art; Engineering; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Politics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05880536777569353,"score_gpt":0.3017641712255371,"score_spread":0.24295880344984358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1538953595","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015703224,0.00074586924,0.7041204,0.0491398,0.003481769,0.0033996413,0.005127427,0.0005572304,0.21772464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98919314,0.00005326525,0.0008308301,0.005868464,0.0002598595,0.00032214963,0.00008155536,0.000019401135,0.0033713197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962316,0.00012449193,0.0007352843,0.0006525653,0.0009824064,0.0012736092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979098,0.00039914678,0.00037133208,0.00030938917,0.00050590513,0.00050446973],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044648096,0.00038329954,0.00041525014,0.000075227515,0.0041648047,0.00025656616,0.00047291938,0.0003190698,0.0012059461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011343567,0.00035465893,0.00026594158,0.0003870773,0.003511586,0.0014474149,0.000108641536,0.00024519188,0.000093175135],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017113666,0.00018571103,0.022942198,0.000031391723,0.00014547115,0.0000040696937,0.0010182661,0.00011834579,0.000045566634,0.9605661,0.014584343,0.00018739297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032938346,0.00018428979,0.0051439498,0.00040626785,0.00019991232,0.00006233365,0.010827915,0.0008824077,0.00057422055,0.028108893,0.9492003,0.0011156863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29187846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6439668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97348994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019671372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009875545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1539272870","doi":"10.21991/c9mt16","title":"M V. H: TIME TO CLEAN UP YOUR ACTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Race, History, and American Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science","score_opus":0.0411475845142006,"score_gpt":0.28162091715183485,"score_spread":0.24047333263763426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1539272870","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0068687145,0.0003262903,0.023792472,0.0056855194,0.0035984972,0.0009083989,0.00022376013,0.00057927566,0.95801705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9732317,0.00005133426,0.0028544825,0.004124491,0.00043067156,0.000081381,0.000045112738,0.000018159259,0.019162716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967559,0.00014622297,0.00050642097,0.000655694,0.00076891325,0.0011668258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980414,0.000113192546,0.00020004698,0.00042665034,0.00041730268,0.0008014047],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066647795,0.00035087025,0.00039918858,0.00021614585,0.0038358052,0.000088068475,0.00067616196,0.00025924155,0.0049870596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069001375,0.00037582504,0.0003441613,0.0007220215,0.014384307,0.0008265451,0.00016021835,0.0003063609,0.007946658],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005501185,0.000119720404,0.0017501191,0.0000047604153,0.000056872366,0.000016977025,0.0039946237,0.000034157518,0.00015114642,0.90489876,0.0862806,0.0026372445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005928671,0.00007236502,0.00041847074,0.0000649892,0.000046080684,0.000032537828,0.021083713,0.000032194876,0.0001475371,0.0042708544,0.9726484,0.00058999745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000685805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039981626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96636295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006586875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030502484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542062513","doi":"10.21991/c9hm16","title":"CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM IN SOUTH AFRICA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Geography; Development economics; Economics","score_opus":0.05168537418911047,"score_gpt":0.2833531090796398,"score_spread":0.23166773489052933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1542062513","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021016465,0.001858803,0.027052352,0.0015597828,0.003113937,0.00099328,0.00034736207,0.00049539376,0.96247745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927356,0.00004155302,0.004614243,0.0006357826,0.00030195873,0.00019616575,0.00006938397,0.000013498958,0.0013918059],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99484545,0.00022912085,0.0010336018,0.0009009506,0.0012171605,0.0017737034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977907,0.00017015915,0.0003062335,0.00058225705,0.00051924,0.0006313902],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011353965,0.0005143001,0.00055947044,0.00048455223,0.0024241891,0.00014456324,0.0009979042,0.0005269462,0.002276907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011068058,0.0005267245,0.00032335726,0.001350342,0.0336838,0.0015539557,0.0003062218,0.0006988269,0.0016411175],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010886791,0.0002477716,0.033508856,0.000010665144,0.000051235358,0.0001321726,0.018226475,0.000045139106,0.000012777742,0.9466491,0.0007257971,0.00028117708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021695371,0.000076181685,0.00093092,0.00021422512,0.00006145933,0.00006283178,0.032015283,0.00008367634,0.00012940381,0.06246225,0.90069664,0.0010975881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012367682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014627443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99063396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019357532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041784737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W154298146","doi":"10.21991/c9k66k","title":"FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION - LABOUR STRIKES OUT AGAIN","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Mathematics and Applications","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of association; Association (psychology); Economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology; Human rights","score_opus":0.05945372667446369,"score_gpt":0.28788905066399145,"score_spread":0.22843532398952776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W154298146","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037616283,0.00034753562,0.62762636,0.0022687167,0.0018129285,0.001708608,0.0018376096,0.00048112145,0.32630083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9553987,0.000029304343,0.042102754,0.00016557219,0.00009514668,0.00013019402,0.000061584986,0.000016597847,0.0020001396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974699,0.000058278714,0.0009529718,0.0003793245,0.0005878811,0.0005516536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974967,0.0004707076,0.0007104618,0.00054060813,0.0006104785,0.00017102376],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006284686,0.00030913742,0.00048949866,0.00021647489,0.0005133208,0.00003739842,0.00041877897,0.00025965652,0.0008465881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001434152,0.00029646268,0.00027585492,0.00031116675,0.0014511793,0.00033186303,0.0001486679,0.00024679414,0.00021150189],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001810224,0.0004088007,0.008509738,0.00007605162,0.00014247265,0.000003415038,0.00020128128,0.000019691126,0.0005152631,0.9626781,0.027279692,0.00014741375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016783783,0.000082489736,0.0005732771,0.00027121665,0.00020813828,0.000053970816,0.0014949037,0.0006818379,0.0053099063,0.9180981,0.070883565,0.0006642455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000056187768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000118809374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9177824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022869889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064866466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1543043721","doi":"10.21991/c98s9s","title":"NOVEL CONCEPTS: A COMMENT ON EGAN AND NESBIT V. THE QUEEN","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Art; Biology; Zoology","score_opus":0.041116598682663624,"score_gpt":0.2977348988346435,"score_spread":0.25661830015197984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1543043721","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017227333,0.00045057238,0.049889356,0.07325181,0.0020206932,0.0010702406,0.00056583196,0.0002699543,0.87075883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97220856,0.000109819826,0.0012593783,0.024820877,0.00029176945,0.000105923435,0.00004350022,0.000010242812,0.0011499554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99722695,0.00016814249,0.00049693027,0.0004982143,0.00068925956,0.0009205115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981157,0.0005328002,0.0002063655,0.00038732792,0.00032132355,0.00043648414],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059026683,0.00035385514,0.0003231316,0.00013841513,0.004383444,0.0001314895,0.00052531756,0.00020122051,0.000559867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005349249,0.00028227453,0.00018095497,0.0003464073,0.02949534,0.0004765141,0.00017500155,0.00040267414,0.00019059182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058567388,0.00017095212,0.005063674,0.0000052449295,0.00007508207,0.000012527325,0.0006439894,0.00003119004,0.00001849777,0.9825001,0.010940817,0.00047939408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086381414,0.000094832365,0.00074879394,0.0000894069,0.000062922874,0.00009512639,0.007986043,0.00002240193,0.000053765194,0.017215643,0.9723402,0.00042705005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005406283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00073382206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9704858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030998417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00393149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1546927699","doi":"10.21991/c9nm2t","title":"STRENGTHENING THE ECONOMIC UNION: THE CHARTER AND THE AGREEMENT ON INTERNAL TRADE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitution; Political science; Race to the bottom; Government (linguistics); Economic union; Constitutional law; Economic integration; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Globalization","score_opus":0.02572590153593192,"score_gpt":0.248705989543933,"score_spread":0.22298008800800106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1546927699","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016880944,0.0015347023,0.00493126,0.43508446,0.0038027847,0.0016228893,0.00071361655,0.000089454,0.5353399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98833025,0.00016513665,0.000022290536,0.009870098,0.00041046445,0.0000763185,0.000005063755,0.0000043155396,0.0011160857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983328,0.00023703885,0.00033167907,0.00026976454,0.00031313175,0.0005155868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987826,0.0005498762,0.00017992486,0.0003146186,0.000031381278,0.0001416376],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010380672,0.00018991265,0.0001612125,0.000049115028,0.0037649963,0.00015372393,0.0005842847,0.00008378851,0.00045593543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002526247,0.00010245386,0.00015248917,0.00010838945,0.015937593,0.00028128992,0.00009697178,0.00031779028,0.00012405134],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006931216,0.000013342261,0.0010862217,0.000001390441,0.00004901769,0.0000034338454,0.0023992693,0.000059436796,8.998002e-7,0.97708267,0.017391566,0.0018434628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014005743,0.000035559297,0.0026775743,0.00006484554,0.000048006066,0.000079595746,0.006183997,0.0003380011,0.000029525234,0.043138042,0.9457802,0.0002240877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01429527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027389202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97144926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030099426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011278635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99753195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1547336736","doi":"10.21991/c9w97s","title":"The PHS Case and Federalism-Based Alternatives to Charter Activism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Argument (complex analysis); Federalism; Law; Downtown; Political science; Federal court; Cooperative federalism; Public administration; Medicine","score_opus":0.018712863592667526,"score_gpt":0.29312943236201083,"score_spread":0.2744165687693433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1547336736","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.077463314,0.0013020727,0.14208972,0.22531626,0.0043179113,0.0035151863,0.0006080924,0.000537925,0.5448495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887632,0.00005319142,0.0011464886,0.007351864,0.00033830825,0.0003081138,0.000023399525,0.000010270071,0.0020051629],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972181,0.00020170255,0.0004434707,0.00049406337,0.00059857476,0.001044144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974401,0.00087531394,0.00015266381,0.00031189938,0.00053920405,0.0006808147],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044569434,0.00032781623,0.00027655312,0.0001558256,0.007985537,0.00062643894,0.00036126436,0.00014815033,0.00036674208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071115425,0.0002640722,0.00014960881,0.0003228754,0.016372332,0.000829647,0.0001420956,0.00028134504,0.0004099476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019567206,0.00004709728,0.0025726797,0.0000046425866,0.00005084093,0.00008689705,0.00019922409,0.00012485322,0.0000525128,0.9857943,0.008347991,0.0026993968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006771747,0.000059584392,0.0003379904,0.000062480525,0.000034166667,0.0006490221,0.006322708,0.00032588933,0.00008438479,0.01561292,0.97532296,0.00051072706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044452776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021031124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9701814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029060483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037827047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1547460574","doi":"10.21991/c9x95b","title":"Advice to the Minister of Democratic Reform","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Prime minister; Democracy; Government (linguistics); General election; Political science; Public administration; Governor; Power (physics); Accountability; Legislation; Commons; Law; Politics; Parliament","score_opus":0.016448884517866233,"score_gpt":0.2741907631426561,"score_spread":0.25774187862478987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1547460574","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015592507,0.00042089264,0.018563665,0.09790126,0.0021505002,0.0016131853,0.00022745512,0.00014536384,0.86338514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894737,0.000014945668,0.000641034,0.004862901,0.0002486445,0.00018314584,0.00000929346,0.000005259409,0.004561052],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976159,0.000097910124,0.0005576381,0.00029339586,0.000675926,0.0007592564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847007,0.0002065832,0.00017729258,0.00035042263,0.0004430746,0.00035256028],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046710562,0.00018724761,0.0002678228,0.000075793876,0.0014818598,0.000096927484,0.00054373225,0.00013794586,0.00051460124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074213796,0.00013267118,0.00016547232,0.00041225302,0.004853971,0.00056831975,0.00013563735,0.00015879459,0.0011154723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000808185,0.000042831445,0.003422133,0.000011366882,0.000024249068,0.0000017579115,0.00019155862,0.0000375836,0.000062079125,0.9595679,0.036119685,0.000510746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003628731,0.000044364537,0.003036984,0.00015376626,0.00002316049,0.000027562299,0.004302128,0.00011365798,0.00010655113,0.03263034,0.9589228,0.0002757937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015489545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004609171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97388124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003852261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012984984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1547489040","doi":"10.21991/c95d45","title":"\"THE WEST\": MYTH OR REALITY IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM PROCESS?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Process (computing); Political science; Aesthetics; Art; Literature; Computer science","score_opus":0.06010716656925265,"score_gpt":0.32642428402698465,"score_spread":0.266317117457732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1547489040","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00173284,0.0008188484,0.016662657,0.03024723,0.002343579,0.0014672147,0.0004615496,0.00025059667,0.9460155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913547,0.0003141715,0.00049620564,0.005385286,0.00046187994,0.00036323263,0.0001022061,0.000010558844,0.0015117343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99444157,0.00052017445,0.0011187575,0.000698074,0.0015229844,0.0016984345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99677306,0.0009912623,0.0003964176,0.0007023943,0.0007228377,0.000414042],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002539456,0.00050381717,0.0004485096,0.00022737106,0.008464636,0.00027624643,0.0015927543,0.00034212478,0.0007862317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017971927,0.0003158518,0.00030215693,0.0012543229,0.069484174,0.0011431056,0.00015721926,0.0007992468,0.0003508014],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024231162,0.00024193693,0.007970455,0.000013492766,0.00005635334,0.00010269374,0.0009399322,0.000060292787,0.0000024935193,0.9848822,0.0049197488,0.0005681299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010015484,0.000087337736,0.001460436,0.00012316834,0.000065095875,0.0005013304,0.030470146,0.00003800309,0.000019234214,0.073447004,0.8921791,0.00060759776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042378097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0121165095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9896219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010554626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020456802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1547737204","doi":"10.21991/c9td42","title":"Constitutional Law and the Alberta Energy Regulator","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Regulator; Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Tribunal; Law and economics; Sociology; Chemistry","score_opus":0.00806432428901928,"score_gpt":0.23600027991086098,"score_spread":0.22793595562184168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1547737204","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00064480753,0.00080043473,0.036506474,0.031611927,0.0013694759,0.0004392169,0.0001072805,0.00012478208,0.9283956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98170877,0.00017403894,0.0003754615,0.01432643,0.0005377444,0.0001017319,0.00007653719,0.000007288887,0.002691997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99715847,0.00037032555,0.00049410353,0.0005098483,0.0006617185,0.00080553733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99794674,0.0009912023,0.0001760023,0.00038298857,0.00010884384,0.0003942173],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008706974,0.00032856406,0.00037135155,0.00006733214,0.0053581013,0.00020719369,0.00043495122,0.0002559707,0.00048863766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005943544,0.0002597758,0.00022060752,0.00023176301,0.086039156,0.0006500441,0.00021536768,0.00024351478,0.00021136386],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081583545,0.000050742226,0.0017777482,0.0000052490013,0.000058343823,0.0000024261515,0.00015358976,0.000108834734,0.000018835139,0.9941839,0.0028443688,0.00071438134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001955243,0.000018566905,0.00006750052,0.000041610932,0.000048351565,0.0000969269,0.00045941278,0.00019568106,0.00005343286,0.18940721,0.8073479,0.0003081852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009914881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013601698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98106396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020904916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007352595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1548364816","doi":"10.21991/c9hd48","title":"Insite: Right Answer, Wrong Question","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Disaster Response and Management","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Epistemology; Law and economics; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.036998682425772915,"score_gpt":0.37309322742554396,"score_spread":0.33609454499977104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1548364816","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033187058,0.0023162118,0.26427925,0.0073256227,0.0132965855,0.0023627782,0.00030687646,0.00078996655,0.67613566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838767,0.00008246944,0.00132923,0.005740783,0.00082475884,0.00043767036,0.0003356995,0.000022895081,0.007349801],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99573517,0.00044662735,0.0009510777,0.00050977943,0.0006252283,0.0017320968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99786645,0.00031725632,0.00031899524,0.00059922104,0.00033056707,0.00056749355],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011632753,0.00044740346,0.0004373724,0.0004217117,0.0031078772,0.0000446791,0.00036380586,0.00036411875,0.002425601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044726653,0.00040909642,0.00022317495,0.0004707033,0.0022209636,0.0016828467,0.0004176779,0.00066441926,0.0058631967],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013993215,0.00022616608,0.06721818,0.00006722686,0.0000906931,0.00001596376,0.00034286018,0.00006072432,0.00016126345,0.87395024,0.056754015,0.00097270665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018740557,0.000050878924,0.005488137,0.00039049596,0.000106902975,0.000080405596,0.0045377216,0.00013308237,0.00008519809,0.009532365,0.9771456,0.00057512126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011711264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013156612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9506896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005861085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011865105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W154916456","doi":"10.21991/c9fw9c","title":"CRISIS WHAT CRISIS? THE RECOGNITION ISSUE AND CANADIAN IDENTITY CRISES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Ceremony; Sovereignty; Identity (music); Identity crisis; Political science; Political economy; National identity; Sociology; History; Law; Aesthetics; Politics; Social science; Face (sociological concept); Art","score_opus":0.0418242826888563,"score_gpt":0.25739348300782444,"score_spread":0.21556920031896815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W154916456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014290536,0.02208252,0.012365032,0.18081218,0.020160625,0.0027807455,0.0016640326,0.00059924467,0.7452451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98672867,0.0032418575,0.00030670865,0.008202674,0.00035675112,0.000086412525,0.00006687336,0.000010680467,0.0009994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976438,0.00016356788,0.00038796433,0.00047117338,0.0005063693,0.0008270796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832547,0.0000887104,0.0001343911,0.00031274435,0.00041745626,0.0007212149],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007195058,0.00022090951,0.00023129184,0.0007215774,0.008845629,0.0014475619,0.00045354044,0.00024922675,0.0038459562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004101669,0.00023864866,0.00016521828,0.00055262167,0.010226887,0.004282962,0.000087565124,0.000307045,0.0010290894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013572373,0.000031876534,0.0009738698,0.0000091726,0.000045069148,0.0000299779,0.0025468753,0.0000020701686,0.0000027050073,0.8700847,0.123653665,0.002606439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028786296,0.000018359784,0.0006672703,0.000065372216,0.000092296286,0.00006870265,0.064335145,0.00000530829,0.0000126176255,0.06677602,0.86732763,0.00034341897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8883565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9881924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9724381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011012589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056143505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1550395734","doi":"10.21991/c97w9h","title":"RELUCTANT WARRIOR, ENTHUSIASTIC PEACEKEEPER: DOMESTIC LEGAL REGULATION OF CANADIAN PARTICIPATION IN ARMED CONFLICTS*","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Legitimacy; Law; Obligation; Charter; Ratification; Opposition (politics); Politics; Public administration","score_opus":0.03857652285007627,"score_gpt":0.2918968558749897,"score_spread":0.2533203330249134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1550395734","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33461985,0.0002517002,0.008381731,0.0030084457,0.002711115,0.0013034851,0.00029885356,0.00014887724,0.64927596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978525,0.000029481444,0.0006213661,0.00027480908,0.00012265074,0.00007416703,0.00012244035,0.000008848203,0.0008937186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972726,0.00013888572,0.00076865853,0.0003952186,0.000650317,0.0007742859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985009,0.00013503544,0.00025350996,0.000229764,0.00049529073,0.00038554094],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005870532,0.00023633681,0.00031241128,0.0011365761,0.0011233839,0.00005860216,0.0003381522,0.0002299076,0.0016814305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006032479,0.00024371174,0.00014585763,0.0005247855,0.0049260925,0.0008593701,0.00004250768,0.0002296192,0.00014459688],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007513659,0.00013609997,0.007763989,0.000011212277,0.000035457604,0.00004104798,0.0020839984,0.00032057933,0.00015588502,0.9890429,0.00018784129,0.00014587572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004490421,0.00026231076,0.121009536,0.0007967831,0.00021784105,0.00017549354,0.0033673341,0.002032256,0.0015522955,0.45092407,0.41358244,0.0015892185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14237161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40756673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6632327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006645689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036291876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99923116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551668827","doi":"10.21991/c9kd4w","title":"The Notwithstanding Clause, the Charter, and Canada's Patriated Constitution: What I Thought We Were Doing","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"CARE Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Legislature; Constitution; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Establishment Clause; Bill of rights; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology; First amendment; Philosophy; Linguistics; Supreme court","score_opus":0.02493831321886555,"score_gpt":0.2755818411728401,"score_spread":0.2506435279539746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1551668827","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04673191,0.16039903,0.017704686,0.5319672,0.043445952,0.00666445,0.00074736064,0.0010023137,0.19133708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892348,0.0073074717,0.00021227256,0.0014488652,0.000896246,0.00012073685,0.00002905601,0.000009331416,0.0007412434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99586713,0.00035788555,0.0006525222,0.00044484105,0.0010912064,0.001586428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99712515,0.0013138751,0.00031996955,0.00034393443,0.00042941593,0.00046767693],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014140154,0.0004421615,0.00038849167,0.000061199346,0.019637913,0.00089082203,0.00055119616,0.00023485592,0.000102364866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008987595,0.00026984487,0.0001781125,0.00041903168,0.015643125,0.0022953926,0.0003031021,0.0005601795,0.00005368571],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003458444,0.00002848834,0.02121732,0.000010569397,0.00014467759,0.0000072641883,0.0014053647,0.000040598818,0.00002390779,0.96281546,0.011683698,0.0025880386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000712622,0.00001293625,0.0010722615,0.00021137898,0.000092466245,0.00008737685,0.07041894,0.000036572423,0.000047050813,0.0012503227,0.92561835,0.00043974948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.094449274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4838969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96156514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001353728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002973736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1552038713","doi":"10.21991/c98d6v","title":"Status Quo Unacceptable; Senate Reform Possible; Abolition by Stealth Anti-Democratic","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Status quo; Democracy; Supreme court; Assertion; Political science; Government (linguistics); Deliberative democracy; Conversation; Public administration; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.02756846547895683,"score_gpt":0.3079304965949745,"score_spread":0.2803620311160177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1552038713","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015905565,0.0033368077,0.04626789,0.014269428,0.004582414,0.0012750151,0.0027489027,0.00074629433,0.9108677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867232,0.0004482916,0.0012406224,0.0037134201,0.00056426093,0.00010078118,0.00096445635,0.000025066167,0.006219911],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937333,0.0003701953,0.0010622093,0.00083627494,0.001654367,0.002343665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957191,0.00019941202,0.00046745568,0.00054407417,0.0012157885,0.0018541865],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011268425,0.00059195,0.00068558316,0.00036555468,0.0038756973,0.00033245666,0.000637472,0.00043178003,0.0004018583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009797756,0.00059732195,0.00028962002,0.0010003501,0.016538294,0.0019942203,0.00019991827,0.0005821073,0.0006375288],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005661317,0.00020180982,0.008270104,0.00002110736,0.00008537613,0.00002741913,0.0002262622,0.0002388137,0.000116164214,0.93389225,0.05642991,0.00043415304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001997812,0.00010476364,0.00020942756,0.00015172247,0.00009943621,0.00014879998,0.014483386,0.00010623247,0.0002405719,0.034255568,0.947246,0.0009562879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010119293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016271563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9708176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031263158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024247447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1552243689","doi":"10.21991/c9037n","title":"Disputed Election Results: A More Rigorous \"Magic Number Test\"","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Democracy; Political science; General election; Government (linguistics); Law; Faith; Public administration; Politics; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014966732551563122,"score_gpt":0.2775262897633366,"score_spread":0.2625595572117735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1552243689","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012581731,0.0010334312,0.030377114,0.067686856,0.004253519,0.0023617905,0.0007634342,0.0011660008,0.8797761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924054,0.00027668377,0.0009608889,0.0026837545,0.0007759008,0.00032038742,0.00022244315,0.000015454516,0.0023390835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99538237,0.00015170546,0.00095823524,0.0008683996,0.0011927412,0.001446547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969094,0.0006199935,0.00032517037,0.00039200965,0.0012295193,0.0005239339],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005444157,0.0005204482,0.00051458017,0.000240449,0.0055916333,0.0003585191,0.0005570999,0.0003803501,0.0014550382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002802767,0.00049956917,0.00035420814,0.0011983705,0.015476004,0.0017227477,0.00022069059,0.0005011492,0.0050449553],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051649084,0.0002641806,0.026858957,0.00000654115,0.00010272025,0.000022878548,0.0002886779,0.00010362725,0.00011562076,0.92183924,0.048452564,0.0018933238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025797358,0.00009153387,0.008205607,0.00022161288,0.00012970764,0.0002578019,0.008979115,0.00033472714,0.00013160551,0.19466348,0.7831545,0.0012505961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012901672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029747754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97982365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077409483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002830327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1553316687","doi":"10.21991/c97s9g","title":"SMOKING GUNS: THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CONFRONTS THE TOBACCO AND GUN LOBBIES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Gun Ownership and Violence Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Political science; Environmental health; Gun control; Public administration; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.0624335028299581,"score_gpt":0.3012717482031064,"score_spread":0.23883824537314832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1553316687","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08388908,0.005026801,0.016909724,0.062982194,0.0037712117,0.0025282393,0.00028880578,0.00029984684,0.8243041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996428,0.0004986568,0.00015892953,0.0017855826,0.00021716155,0.000117878895,0.000008864621,0.0000069686757,0.0007779183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967608,0.00027376527,0.00037484837,0.00041351808,0.0012012199,0.0009758761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985807,0.00044965153,0.00014256292,0.00036065196,0.00022507478,0.00024137371],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001499103,0.00025402298,0.00021574102,0.000053335334,0.006886274,0.00034741932,0.00073739147,0.00017277201,0.0007714836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00080518157,0.00015548422,0.00014992629,0.00028068008,0.01715994,0.0006625937,0.00031561052,0.00042335357,0.000099057914],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040676845,0.00004707008,0.116229415,0.0000042689244,0.0000636994,0.0000096320655,0.0014252552,0.000007840507,0.000012979023,0.8746725,0.0034920326,0.00399467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015724086,0.00011828509,0.034365494,0.0002895707,0.00010849865,0.00015628405,0.13829438,0.00016949933,0.00026200557,0.11436892,0.70947534,0.0008193348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001988844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034323635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91253895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003401256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001341788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99440664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1554680488","doi":"10.21991/c9zw91","title":"FEDERAL HOUSE COMMITTEE REFORM: MINDLESS ADVERSARIALISM WELL DONE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Housing Market and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"House of Representatives; Political science; Public administration; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04128013979092135,"score_gpt":0.20979684209302113,"score_spread":0.16851670230209978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1554680488","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026652304,0.0006530498,0.08472655,0.001970252,0.005795519,0.0005975772,0.0005738842,0.0004682899,0.87856257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992622,0.00021050163,0.0041300687,0.0014792534,0.0002933322,0.00007293542,0.00013410368,0.00004809423,0.0010096763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99649507,0.000032611697,0.0013673569,0.0008835951,0.00011502637,0.0011063444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981395,0.000057917725,0.00057438656,0.00072885107,0.00013068647,0.00036863744],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067542586,0.00052065094,0.00079371856,0.00048445075,0.0013697254,0.00019449438,0.00065878726,0.00041699543,0.0020672374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001403353,0.0006080477,0.0004267111,0.00032796152,0.0032273533,0.0012654539,0.00029004193,0.0004379537,0.004461161],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014474614,0.0002345842,0.0515856,0.000021499494,0.00013671153,0.00003391896,0.00016335263,0.00010447364,0.000010510973,0.940571,0.0066104517,0.00038315367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006837862,0.00021655398,0.00573415,0.00017275482,0.00007861463,0.0005645562,0.0021548707,0.003117769,0.0005176867,0.3003405,0.6776219,0.00264276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016762265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00054873805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96596974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077877636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044139475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1555058664","doi":"10.21991/c9ph23","title":"L'AFFAIRE MAHE: LE JUDGEMENT DE LA DECENNIE EN DROITS LINGUISTIQUES","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Geography; Art","score_opus":0.024060295937690452,"score_gpt":0.2931480949243509,"score_spread":0.26908779898666046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1555058664","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0075648814,0.025048563,0.044720493,0.016986988,0.010260391,0.00092673406,0.00040563484,0.00044803956,0.89363825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9718989,0.003095641,0.00847564,0.0013739364,0.0015658078,0.00012253967,0.000062571125,0.000023157078,0.013381775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952868,0.0006884905,0.00086680404,0.00078761816,0.00076196046,0.0016082955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99720955,0.0006718725,0.00033675536,0.00033678848,0.0008466645,0.00059834484],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014805738,0.0006335729,0.00063739065,0.00014544529,0.004727045,0.00019311933,0.00071223907,0.0007910286,0.0009808028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032773898,0.00065129617,0.00049347023,0.000518986,0.029181289,0.0005776953,0.00040752135,0.0007044193,0.00061782385],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048633676,0.00046859766,0.020701634,0.000055596523,0.00036274156,0.00018901116,0.007408443,0.00006258444,0.000014503017,0.94852364,0.01913556,0.003029039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010737935,0.00008386846,0.0014394468,0.00045412892,0.00024090403,0.00014361164,0.024179664,0.00012791005,0.0001600279,0.20837031,0.76291394,0.00081238826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007414125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014246834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9643341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001315365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048162327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1556805264","doi":"10.21991/c9vd4c","title":"READING THE PREAMBLE TO THE BRITISH NORTH AMERICA ACT, 1867","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Sports and Literature","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Preamble; Reading (process); History; Telecommunications; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.019667952441810264,"score_gpt":0.20525444392846293,"score_spread":0.18558649148665265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1556805264","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00902271,0.0008300125,0.013355906,0.010590328,0.0039414014,0.0013358135,0.0011964358,0.00033644604,0.95939094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9729449,0.000035001154,0.00029029307,0.010257538,0.0007572663,0.00018969296,0.0001813894,0.00001752168,0.0153263975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777925,0.000053329113,0.0004936588,0.00048694073,0.00042488586,0.0007619357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857885,0.00009478444,0.00020657669,0.000560365,0.00034035725,0.00021907745],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018508811,0.0003317587,0.00030364766,0.0000883799,0.006323308,0.00094707834,0.00069819455,0.00006735792,0.004986238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012098118,0.00021878403,0.0002448233,0.00024697708,0.008225585,0.0006304892,0.00022497521,0.00042059727,0.0006442673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035625315,0.000071546754,0.0037943309,0.0000052553387,0.000071964016,0.0000411861,0.0036916356,0.0001006065,0.0000019506313,0.83459854,0.15411848,0.0034688495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023194059,0.00007112894,0.0010131358,0.00008891103,0.000060628583,0.0002951603,0.009130205,0.000057853704,0.00000638873,0.0011899713,0.9874888,0.0003658652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026271248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005345823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9639222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009107563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005966642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99592334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1559582061","doi":"10.21991/c92m2j","title":"DISTINCT STATUS FOR QUÉBEC: A BENEFIT TO ENGLISH CANADA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Demography; Genealogy; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.018722872757179536,"score_gpt":0.2221988899486685,"score_spread":0.20347601719148894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1559582061","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012192115,0.0019452331,0.039015826,0.012000396,0.014053551,0.0029383725,0.0063818046,0.000488516,0.91098416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98926854,0.000029217206,0.0011560948,0.002120391,0.00041309066,0.00026810818,0.00010929047,0.000013177484,0.00662206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973718,0.000035100657,0.00042923415,0.000492235,0.00052871543,0.0011429258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99774367,0.00017039484,0.0001238249,0.0002894968,0.0007313868,0.00094121456],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027769755,0.00022687437,0.00028288437,0.00039962266,0.0047888574,0.00021972017,0.00042267647,0.00014884883,0.0014478384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016314294,0.0002968655,0.0001814189,0.000424929,0.0048268554,0.00048731908,0.00008177532,0.00016595326,0.00011829091],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059373368,0.00004817086,0.0070018047,0.000010827494,0.00004679097,0.000013952875,0.0016577357,0.000027148311,0.0000037903096,0.8854624,0.10421687,0.0014511024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054032204,0.000038168797,0.0016894462,0.00004350307,0.00005046935,0.000007284717,0.004404414,0.000009715267,0.000009904255,0.005691288,0.9871013,0.00041417935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9957385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9770765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044554234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04105645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W15623030","doi":"10.21991/c9q074","title":"CANADA AND QUÉBEC IN A NEW WORLD: THE PQ'S ECONOMIC PROPOSALS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Cooperative Studies and Economics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.019899426003074278,"score_gpt":0.19314956593008567,"score_spread":0.17325013992701138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W15623030","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18171445,0.002986919,0.0036745379,0.07499766,0.0058378135,0.0024478482,0.00020476051,0.00022231656,0.7279137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99368227,0.000032929413,0.000117214986,0.0048140376,0.00036111596,0.00004168581,0.000018484445,0.000008809655,0.00092345406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857914,0.0000081555245,0.00044236987,0.00037541488,0.00010802671,0.00048691747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946153,0.00006249902,0.00014536497,0.00021496584,0.00007313721,0.000042514923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016709592,0.00026129256,0.0002743379,0.00019320806,0.0008578892,0.00014811277,0.00026046866,0.000046942725,0.0006991129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009955572,0.00020667212,0.000067169945,0.0002196551,0.001667876,0.00090766384,0.00032368038,0.00017863057,0.00016590267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034803146,0.00001785453,0.15494365,0.000009715525,0.000035429915,0.000009994099,0.00002158569,0.00016896735,0.0000018115636,0.8048115,0.038868375,0.0010763071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011214713,0.000008223273,0.01870749,0.000061016715,0.00003878486,0.000040156265,0.0012451531,0.0015656152,0.0000123125765,0.0144528,0.96230316,0.00044379034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91201866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9234348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040039033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053335065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9461411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1564536184","doi":"10.21991/c9bh4r","title":"R. V. CHAULK AND R. V. SWAIN: INSANITY AND THE CONSTITUTION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Philosophy, History, and Historiography","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Insanity; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.03605406368811123,"score_gpt":0.19410658291241886,"score_spread":0.15805251922430763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1564536184","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006527881,0.010812102,0.005675339,0.004158225,0.004876599,0.0010486478,0.00039088586,0.0003388017,0.9661715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99630624,0.0003794712,0.00024213258,0.0019176017,0.00043054202,0.00011907526,0.00004481192,0.00001090303,0.0005491932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979294,0.000105429055,0.00054113544,0.0005423816,0.00034331653,0.0005383627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872303,0.00014991235,0.00021825472,0.00036772093,0.00029446455,0.00024660036],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045102477,0.00041130002,0.0004449348,0.00034511538,0.0041774954,0.00017240019,0.00027013407,0.0001445484,0.0005656989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016176826,0.00031628727,0.00021604885,0.00012371238,0.048274294,0.0008349803,0.00016349313,0.0003746231,0.000105041174],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023967403,0.00009641412,0.0018650537,0.000029480756,0.00011644623,0.000014979425,0.0035113571,0.0000016564077,0.000011306916,0.9890671,0.0044075856,0.00063895667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033660762,0.000092255425,0.00039714106,0.00009196526,0.00018663229,0.00030121263,0.0035443685,0.000092734896,0.000019548415,0.19191809,0.7994224,0.0005675895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00085698144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012542015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9897784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011577536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046023674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1565630064","doi":"10.21991/c93667","title":"Fédéralisme Canadien et Lutte Contre Les Changements Climatiques","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Gouvernement du Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04255102805523591,"score_gpt":0.25895625336340217,"score_spread":0.21640522530816625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1565630064","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047618886,0.021211166,0.008755998,0.059741795,0.016105615,0.0013267711,0.004303791,0.00031980168,0.88347316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9154259,0.0038414062,0.0015990072,0.006743898,0.0007264462,0.00017733233,0.00033330277,0.00003614878,0.07111659],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995549,0.00038475584,0.0008440227,0.00080095243,0.00076690514,0.0016543342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99750304,0.00013634087,0.00041134105,0.0004644368,0.00055487367,0.0009299587],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082835765,0.00051482156,0.00058459473,0.0008862185,0.00537124,0.00043806987,0.0007034519,0.00060980726,0.009125186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037947446,0.0007002392,0.00043698112,0.00074343325,0.028546358,0.0019090187,0.00021621812,0.0006110874,0.0015808615],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003997163,0.00020735491,0.006530805,0.00006568501,0.00020266054,0.00018725955,0.0037770548,0.000021989248,0.000008154244,0.89749074,0.08746715,0.0040011615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009994068,0.00008837815,0.0010576107,0.00045766076,0.00021479014,0.00017139758,0.008495986,0.00007749613,0.000012634256,0.028167937,0.9594616,0.00079508236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.652515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9441222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91066396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034555048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007977564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99954486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1569009351","doi":"10.21991/c9kt0h","title":"BEGGING AND FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Begging; Freedom of expression; Expression (computer science); Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.04049443135893493,"score_gpt":0.3005001846600774,"score_spread":0.26000575330114245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1569009351","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029142085,0.0019477912,0.53939646,0.0008112294,0.001222595,0.000796756,0.0003023826,0.00034192007,0.42603877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853538,0.000070252325,0.013633054,0.0003463701,0.00005602498,0.00018882756,0.000030709944,0.000011036122,0.0003098829],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984723,0.000037938084,0.00047582365,0.00043096903,0.00018309618,0.00039989105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899274,0.00007115217,0.00020561976,0.00044509606,0.00013631987,0.00014907775],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017864756,0.00022301676,0.00025986033,0.0002057993,0.00041962485,0.000015066957,0.0002565399,0.00018695647,0.0015489599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028596638,0.00021068314,0.00011918768,0.00022378839,0.0039329184,0.00023278494,0.0000832553,0.0001805195,0.000070408576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008179046,0.00021834939,0.02010121,0.0000089886635,0.000050268663,0.000005562208,0.00024367623,0.0000038262656,0.0042294557,0.9671285,0.005894848,0.0020335165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0076101497,0.00064942526,0.03404565,0.0009128201,0.00022363756,0.0015522669,0.0075680236,0.00036446532,0.031883806,0.41390264,0.49911675,0.0021703485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001258666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014434027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95621175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031811393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014739107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W15701400","doi":"10.21991/c9467x","title":"WAGING WAR: JAPAN’S CONSTITUTIONAL CONSTRAINTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Justiciability; Cabinet (room); Supreme court; Constitution; Legislation; Political science; Context (archaeology); Politics; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.03950356349238269,"score_gpt":0.2793096196738773,"score_spread":0.23980605618149461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W15701400","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010873313,0.00035257122,0.11540669,0.0033615164,0.005218648,0.00091264024,0.00049068633,0.00062485755,0.86275905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899617,0.000051729054,0.0030844996,0.0018562645,0.0005777995,0.00011663062,0.0001954006,0.000015093308,0.0041408767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99540997,0.00018874182,0.00090456463,0.00083325687,0.0012778977,0.0013855789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974413,0.00024958784,0.00031753178,0.0004102734,0.0009628177,0.00061847444],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082434615,0.0005115505,0.0004731589,0.00047439273,0.005091784,0.00015475477,0.0008717769,0.00038731538,0.009924607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000499036,0.0005170545,0.00042005346,0.00029309758,0.05457037,0.001521226,0.00018759932,0.0005303199,0.0019797143],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068864516,0.00024896133,0.0093405135,0.000010876765,0.00015559579,0.00008255833,0.0008934643,0.00003534989,0.00005504214,0.9840345,0.0045375777,0.0005367421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019704646,0.000069896894,0.00081021193,0.00025489548,0.000111533554,0.0004225886,0.003216798,0.0000989702,0.00043029824,0.5809853,0.41047844,0.0011505843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00066901685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008307801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97908837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00090422406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050134147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1571080196","doi":"10.21991/c91d4x","title":"Section 7, Insite and the Comptence of Courts","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Society of Canada; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Downtown; Section (typography); Business; Economic Justice; Drug trafficking; Law; Political science; Criminology; Medicine; Advertising; Psychology","score_opus":0.03221052678567575,"score_gpt":0.30163856524381916,"score_spread":0.2694280384581434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1571080196","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58564496,0.017713359,0.1554345,0.024105242,0.007140899,0.00410821,0.00050157757,0.0004921792,0.2048591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996632,0.00023302581,0.0011400172,0.0012717379,0.00032139997,0.00005762297,0.000080511556,0.000010974402,0.0002527224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978227,0.00009100125,0.00063387275,0.0003060224,0.0005461846,0.0006001908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983142,0.00034849698,0.00025342562,0.00039625118,0.00037538473,0.00031221512],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006980202,0.000282271,0.00053188443,0.00020963038,0.0007018323,0.00002771773,0.00014515907,0.00018321528,0.00011395786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067691656,0.00020273389,0.00021055297,0.00031034154,0.010608506,0.0005644777,0.00016337568,0.0003781629,0.00008768994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042754805,0.00018601639,0.097219005,0.00009897289,0.0001253452,0.0000062715935,0.00042625418,0.00009706668,0.0008123483,0.8971624,0.0022496653,0.001189131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.07916339,0.0013803479,0.22104448,0.005521539,0.00458724,0.02883273,0.070728935,0.012227114,0.013321936,0.05021875,0.5089026,0.0040709255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007312136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026073154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8469436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012728391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006192735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.992084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1572393345","doi":"10.21991/c93968","title":"The IOC Made Me Do it: Women’s Ski Jumping, VANOC, and the 2010 Winter Olympics","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Doping in Sports","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Political science; State (computer science); Novelty; Power (physics); Action (physics); Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.024721835276420464,"score_gpt":0.26711107987009436,"score_spread":0.2423892445936739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1572393345","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039744854,0.010385404,0.029176012,0.08732615,0.028157005,0.0039075436,0.00022189705,0.0007842609,0.8002969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987355,0.0010260127,0.00032138446,0.0033329788,0.00039426808,0.00030290105,0.000010881287,0.000014976683,0.0072416244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963723,0.00023655937,0.00069075637,0.000579552,0.00082755025,0.0012932995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99772835,0.0006379032,0.00031500802,0.00060788373,0.00035536542,0.0003555087],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002026643,0.0003734917,0.00036891887,0.00013352127,0.0068544974,0.00048151906,0.00091505144,0.00027656349,0.00075687363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013299773,0.00024800244,0.00023590602,0.00036482516,0.03575432,0.000769347,0.00038430028,0.0004749876,0.00027379213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001210598,0.00005696559,0.010978728,0.000008282291,0.00010451219,0.000016946782,0.0048483834,0.000012886715,0.000008366479,0.96514696,0.017620308,0.0010765967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001964998,0.000037313817,0.0013348735,0.00020436806,0.00007590852,0.00013846453,0.022386609,0.00007123937,0.000056120014,0.12766346,0.84555393,0.00051271805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00058955443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008356667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94761014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045118865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019707775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W157640386","doi":"10.21991/c9j94j","title":"THE DEMISE OF POSITIVE LIBERTY? NATIVE WOMEN'S ASSOCIATION OF CANADA V. CANADA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Demise; Association (psychology); Political science; Demography; Genealogy; Law; History; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.009529665562589657,"score_gpt":0.21930988474541108,"score_spread":0.20978021918282141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W157640386","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025472224,0.00066863716,0.003895667,0.010977793,0.0032888954,0.0007940333,0.0025263857,0.000050403818,0.95232594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950285,0.0000674803,0.00020277052,0.0010762456,0.00009140552,0.00004983022,0.000031824362,0.000006042988,0.003445887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99657655,0.00021897872,0.0007238208,0.00027360691,0.001241304,0.00096572423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957644,0.0013458283,0.00071024627,0.00023471966,0.0016008035,0.00034401863],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007494902,0.0002366516,0.0003796705,0.000071495946,0.002397958,0.00002387797,0.000505421,0.00014493712,0.0002552711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024989396,0.00020635781,0.00012410524,0.00045236704,0.008386203,0.00032445582,0.000099774115,0.00024905393,0.0000029629653],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000685183,0.000052712083,0.017223094,0.000008555733,0.00019570826,0.000009703967,0.0007059207,0.00007225855,0.000014229773,0.97083515,0.010642685,0.00017146635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007344377,0.0000633757,0.0030195066,0.00010992574,0.00007511964,0.000018837414,0.020657957,0.000026950838,0.0008995569,0.013060802,0.96087074,0.0004627629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95630735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9861218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9695563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035419443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.095461816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579037692","doi":"10.21991/c9vd5r","title":"Religious Accommodation and its Limits: The Recent Controversy at York University","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; Charter; Religious belief; Religious freedom; Religious identity; Political science; Set (abstract data type); Law; Sociology; Religious discrimination; Human rights; Freedom of religion; Reasonable accommodation; Law and economics; Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Religiosity","score_opus":0.01985733982715497,"score_gpt":0.25303124401880495,"score_spread":0.23317390419164996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579037692","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01154041,0.0027084276,0.030176299,0.09675997,0.0027604229,0.0012778757,0.00058722653,0.00041701994,0.85377234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913445,0.0014169454,0.00026183244,0.0042550275,0.00034999655,0.000013387821,0.00009557401,0.0000074464724,0.0022552775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99746144,0.00035358447,0.00035624718,0.00046438113,0.0006057693,0.00075856445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977534,0.0009124982,0.0002356398,0.00029738777,0.00042472096,0.0003763824],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007003921,0.0002770605,0.00029205604,0.0001283188,0.0056795105,0.000119744196,0.00045570786,0.00021633758,0.00023921391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012424128,0.00024882494,0.00014070468,0.00042920565,0.011227324,0.0004539145,0.00018966131,0.00028272122,0.0002294832],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007347803,0.000039701903,0.003214381,0.0000055061705,0.000050340455,0.000005701085,0.00015519952,0.00025467947,0.000043535558,0.9809594,0.014332978,0.0008650937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008892158,0.000037997856,0.00020199746,0.000042950287,0.00007685407,0.00007353521,0.002605974,0.00028525852,0.000036238715,0.007675184,0.9877394,0.00033542817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006367566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017035265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9798041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007033473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030570908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579225466","doi":"10.21991/c95h2f","title":"THE CONSTITUTIONAL DEBATE IN ISRAEL","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Philosophy; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.04611981975433223,"score_gpt":0.2776323539102004,"score_spread":0.2315125341558682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579225466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011328359,0.008348748,0.02056402,0.007789475,0.0060315686,0.0011687817,0.00024355418,0.00032967934,0.9441958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995918,0.0005756325,0.0004053694,0.0013220751,0.00019296192,0.00017744496,0.000035877056,0.000007876531,0.0013648149],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964573,0.00020111917,0.0007263493,0.000542409,0.0007479565,0.0013248811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982322,0.00043720938,0.0001979944,0.00035260935,0.0004685789,0.00031144076],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010711413,0.00034602272,0.00036375725,0.00030107616,0.0050839107,0.00015588134,0.00068630447,0.00023396352,0.00014059243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012499411,0.00028642558,0.00023696304,0.000765535,0.035610378,0.00082459615,0.0002294361,0.00039540953,0.0005457894],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006237539,0.00011424618,0.13965046,0.0000036077763,0.000085396154,0.000049879705,0.00038958507,0.000023861252,0.000012014104,0.8543342,0.0012070456,0.0040673655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002087926,0.000061275314,0.009042458,0.00022100733,0.00009526869,0.00014391188,0.045690425,0.00016193787,0.000073272844,0.1627262,0.77878743,0.0009089022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017620579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01999308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9845896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049874146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003215104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579513605","doi":"10.21991/c9sx0d","title":"The Politics of Hate Speech: A Case Comment on Warman v Lemire","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Law; Supreme court; Human rights; Statute; Charter; Political science; Politics; Constitutional right; Legitimacy; Sociology","score_opus":0.040232405356439634,"score_gpt":0.3080979706965263,"score_spread":0.26786556534008665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579513605","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044961087,0.009837715,0.009591789,0.16229154,0.01104541,0.002403376,0.0010499927,0.00043574176,0.75838333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946582,0.0003502095,0.0002204743,0.0036074559,0.0006221623,0.00008228889,0.000027544469,0.000007991015,0.00042370183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966615,0.00019861084,0.000659134,0.000297621,0.00090273,0.0012804057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977437,0.0007711349,0.00026963608,0.00033000746,0.00047038964,0.00041508212],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010563358,0.0003062971,0.00034842148,0.00014214542,0.009500431,0.00008828992,0.00040325415,0.00017900646,0.000116148076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00081400754,0.00024829636,0.00028222217,0.00042679405,0.017971015,0.0005033371,0.00020609786,0.00032391195,0.00024096128],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042248932,0.00022995408,0.009250652,0.0000071514437,0.00012419172,0.00007148391,0.00045904348,0.000051651736,0.000013204604,0.9697273,0.017697664,0.0023254736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067277974,0.000059279428,0.0002595552,0.00011781204,0.000084518084,0.00059971097,0.013368431,0.00002326564,0.00029006964,0.0538496,0.93029547,0.00037949643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031894774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001416922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9496971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046435726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012986987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W158278092","doi":"10.21991/c9wt1p","title":"Equalization, Regional Development, and Political Trust: The Section 36/Atlantic Accords Controversy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Grievance; Federalism; Politics; Political science; Nova scotia; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Ethnology","score_opus":0.044957191710041436,"score_gpt":0.2816776993911991,"score_spread":0.23672050768115765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W158278092","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.107055135,0.0012995991,0.20702192,0.026987024,0.006262294,0.0019645856,0.00022046095,0.0005454367,0.64864355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99522996,0.00004025553,0.00041730265,0.0026357907,0.00049398403,0.00007214367,0.000032742035,0.0000077887225,0.0010700093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99727434,0.00016333138,0.00052387227,0.0004085211,0.00063225726,0.0009976806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860984,0.0002796745,0.00017928978,0.0002098071,0.00030884374,0.00041252226],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000629794,0.00024374397,0.00025793797,0.00009421246,0.003161127,0.00013497619,0.00030523623,0.00023055925,0.00024550958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00085964374,0.0001950504,0.000109895525,0.0002958859,0.007925203,0.00064964424,0.000103866645,0.00023645828,0.000076996315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045032273,0.000059921393,0.05415472,0.00001021506,0.000048404414,0.000007743527,0.00058085105,0.0000030951653,0.000013810373,0.9413538,0.003482571,0.00023985896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008579449,0.000028322216,0.014249835,0.00009871822,0.00004241632,0.00013845434,0.004094802,0.00008520279,0.000056210312,0.058457047,0.9215096,0.00038142718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077370247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035500962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91802704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038557878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022551785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99887055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583221229","doi":"10.21991/c92q0t","title":"EDMONTON JOURNAL V. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ALBERTA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"History and advancements in chemistry","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.02522388949952341,"score_gpt":0.23984598240778437,"score_spread":0.21462209290826095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1583221229","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06635678,0.0012731736,0.025646543,0.00025586618,0.0021455374,0.00013964948,0.00033494743,0.00010604818,0.9037415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889829,0.00007640637,0.003974657,0.00024421097,0.00032484106,0.000027181264,0.00010884748,0.000016170667,0.0062447903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975115,0.000020446028,0.00087940885,0.0004443466,0.00047939311,0.00066489127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983043,0.00008498914,0.0004579716,0.0004756581,0.00033974383,0.00033733042],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017800737,0.00037675485,0.00041014334,0.000120068435,0.00085005007,0.000028756322,0.0005644603,0.00026848563,0.008109081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003161656,0.0003757872,0.00033136137,0.0001633232,0.0044891466,0.0006066165,0.00015243437,0.00048048032,0.000098190416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001635607,0.00036019064,0.018302063,0.000087943255,0.00018652873,0.00006054986,0.00014558145,0.00016503608,0.039169125,0.9348715,0.0054826867,0.0010052194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032628544,0.00007201559,0.00016251572,0.00052728964,0.00017966476,0.0022079526,0.001105126,0.00019827475,0.2070593,0.019540846,0.7645887,0.0010954295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000092686525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000048640253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92262614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031472289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001194298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1584023780","doi":"10.21991/c9kq0g","title":"STRIKING THE BALANCE: NATIONAL SECURITY V. THE CHARTER","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Balance (ability); National security; Political science; Public administration; Law; Medicine; Physical medicine and rehabilitation","score_opus":0.041807248201543135,"score_gpt":0.2858542760187468,"score_spread":0.24404702781720367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1584023780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008619222,0.00025880334,0.008500729,0.015386989,0.003403753,0.0007655292,0.00023991252,0.00018240504,0.96264267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99311,0.000023331017,0.000121479934,0.0035173292,0.00075726246,0.00010798575,0.00004749519,0.0000064990195,0.0023085896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972475,0.00018113448,0.00041148247,0.0003501985,0.001170482,0.0006391986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983617,0.00029693433,0.00018678774,0.00025836288,0.0007609434,0.00013526782],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001080746,0.00022622434,0.00016737035,0.00010173174,0.0063326014,0.0001956222,0.00088751776,0.00015226437,0.0021967276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033675827,0.00014029366,0.00022398577,0.00019525479,0.010735373,0.00070838403,0.00012775483,0.00039818062,0.00031137845],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002606449,0.00006939427,0.0026365719,0.0000024209094,0.00006547316,0.0000066367043,0.0012190784,0.000017603008,0.0000062968293,0.98597836,0.009915514,0.000056592067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028714834,0.000011423087,0.0006890122,0.000028910428,0.000018850129,0.00003817925,0.0011167827,0.00013152852,0.000039385355,0.56063277,0.43683332,0.00017265567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042260854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014924401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9844908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003129314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002083815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1584055460","doi":"10.21991/c9bt1q","title":"Semi- Presidentialism à la française: the Recent Constitutional Evolution of the “Two-Headed” Executive","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"European Political History Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Political science; Executive branch; Executive power; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.028453373158206084,"score_gpt":0.2293207254871899,"score_spread":0.2008673523289838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1584055460","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012086994,0.030949969,0.04163447,0.016581865,0.013495329,0.0015183364,0.0045552854,0.00016936177,0.8898867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97202045,0.00042666544,0.00021503225,0.0014183623,0.00093539484,0.00010682662,0.00009397152,0.00003127778,0.02475201],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99367195,0.0010667917,0.0017206825,0.0009230856,0.0012927883,0.0013246941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99528474,0.0007550734,0.00086638087,0.0011940134,0.0015112676,0.00038855293],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010804151,0.0008210141,0.00076716114,0.0003442006,0.005672748,0.00019104432,0.0014317255,0.0003972923,0.006358776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010321671,0.0006055927,0.0010982953,0.0005890256,0.1292951,0.0011598151,0.0006737146,0.0012372357,0.00069097424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015411581,0.0006093135,0.0019782695,0.00009798251,0.00065251434,0.000048695627,0.0017287543,0.0007935173,0.00008591661,0.9446585,0.048971422,0.00022097719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014786527,0.00007514341,0.00066357345,0.00072878355,0.0011799219,0.0005982174,0.0040510413,0.00034118796,0.00049929536,0.09243236,0.89725125,0.0007005877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029667008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014853467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9708118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010334096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049433904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1584692578","doi":"10.21991/c9wm20","title":"Lost in Translation: Social Realities, Insite, and the Law in Legal Education","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Translation (biology); Legal education; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04068595896223407,"score_gpt":0.34353909076111633,"score_spread":0.30285313179888224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1584692578","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008920378,0.002644103,0.0015205987,0.21173212,0.0024560452,0.0009397692,0.00005815448,0.000055464163,0.7716734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926578,0.000147009,0.0003831211,0.00540514,0.0004941204,0.00013688761,0.00008803212,0.000005257736,0.00068266795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979122,0.0003743728,0.00055358786,0.00022696165,0.00038331505,0.00054953806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998845,0.000523897,0.00015955383,0.00013768084,0.00020655483,0.00012732715],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017218677,0.00016610039,0.00021693988,0.0002687987,0.0017915453,0.00023786612,0.0001778305,0.00018440014,0.00025287384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065630267,0.00015147254,0.00008294517,0.0009084739,0.0076447288,0.0031551993,0.000038030612,0.000502415,0.000067969566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070258895,0.00020856349,0.016180435,0.000012630677,0.00001056277,7.98707e-7,0.0060950713,0.000015091445,0.0000038492794,0.97316694,0.0023732923,0.0018625122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016495128,0.0000056697136,0.0043981457,0.00007555804,0.000023415914,0.000038683516,0.032952815,0.0000299788,0.0000046910523,0.03697444,0.9236011,0.00024597716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0130736865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026101233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9837374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036906794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044708936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99950796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W158484458","doi":"10.21991/c9xq0k","title":"UPDATE IN ISRAEL","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.04733209160994819,"score_gpt":0.27894129334374196,"score_spread":0.23160920173379376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W158484458","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023046607,0.0041080075,0.02220981,0.0046414505,0.0032040891,0.0007455932,0.00013316759,0.00031467396,0.9415966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960439,0.0002433982,0.0010997301,0.0014942558,0.00015132998,0.00007995417,0.000025799714,0.0000075383023,0.00085407135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975367,0.00010824328,0.00048333406,0.00044947237,0.00045880026,0.0009634262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990442,0.00007434743,0.00012243251,0.00024554916,0.00025517616,0.0002583226],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051920436,0.0002536549,0.00030482953,0.00029697875,0.0013938831,0.00006071231,0.00040839275,0.00019225641,0.00027677507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045279696,0.00026079107,0.0001583417,0.00053084554,0.007825162,0.00083026843,0.0001653323,0.00025273825,0.0010260597],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028091636,0.00010769115,0.23531196,0.000004494556,0.000026664335,0.000039626877,0.00037251587,0.0000062557538,0.000009205345,0.760637,0.00072838424,0.002728145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031365585,0.000081228034,0.013817339,0.00029444278,0.000070350776,0.00010824984,0.06755003,0.000065450295,0.00021693508,0.28758428,0.62578285,0.0012923108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026421407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015249651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9729973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028818575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014501825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1586099888","doi":"10.21991/c99362","title":"THE DELEGATION POWER PAST AND PRESENT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Scientific Innovation and Industrial Efficiency","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Delegation; Power (physics); Political science; Computer science; Law; Physics","score_opus":0.130898655552262,"score_gpt":0.332228364253527,"score_spread":0.201329708701265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1586099888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050664004,0.0009830372,0.29227364,0.025866298,0.014672183,0.001556075,0.00020432698,0.0002771014,0.61350334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99619806,0.000013279304,0.0005808867,0.0007943226,0.00013362613,0.000044398486,0.000014985647,0.0000051361394,0.0022152807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99596125,0.0001489038,0.001078616,0.00068921834,0.0014966446,0.00062536675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99679416,0.0007095155,0.00037536077,0.000665261,0.00123034,0.00022533804],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029797847,0.00024525667,0.00023422556,0.0003540308,0.003285287,0.00060642016,0.00081532064,0.00016834342,0.00081912917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033840712,0.00015633028,0.00014060088,0.0013566585,0.008392357,0.0010223726,0.00030675056,0.0002782336,0.0006581648],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000519952,0.000056178254,0.011098595,5.7325803e-7,0.000016077944,0.000004252554,0.0001095014,0.000050706276,0.000079023586,0.93889356,0.04140797,0.008231557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010391166,0.000092049406,0.0077354,0.000027028207,0.000016952465,0.00021159831,0.0051967246,0.0020882054,0.0006042382,0.14809853,0.83450574,0.0003844341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038573162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000042420997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9455341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000088287576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008154693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1586771993","doi":"10.21991/c9cq10","title":"TERMINAL CARE, TERMINAL JUSTICE: THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA AND SUE RODRIGUEZ","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Terminal (telecommunication); Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Remand (court procedure); Engineering; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.02368763410841072,"score_gpt":0.2618966319644512,"score_spread":0.23820899785604047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1586771993","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.108425416,0.0056617423,0.009531481,0.0073266006,0.0070098415,0.0018162905,0.00081755116,0.00017830716,0.8592328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99838483,0.00007378112,0.00022175223,0.00048373375,0.0003058694,0.000038915663,0.00001728473,0.000006859479,0.00046694072],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756455,0.000107116364,0.00053864036,0.000359511,0.0007400952,0.00069008983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843407,0.000182138,0.00025825275,0.00024305901,0.0006115838,0.0002708773],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004761633,0.00024406117,0.00032757493,0.00008872805,0.0030026243,0.00007321767,0.00045219195,0.00015972074,0.00021872844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050791196,0.00019359769,0.0000974239,0.00029837986,0.008757151,0.0005183765,0.00012916198,0.00023859013,0.000010360963],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046929377,0.000038603506,0.022390088,0.000082565566,0.00004065694,0.000050321574,0.0018866074,0.000016779633,0.000028317292,0.97032964,0.0044887047,0.0006007895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020754403,0.00023097197,0.014090633,0.00071192015,0.0006157339,0.0007881768,0.11611062,0.00012536153,0.0010480937,0.030398741,0.83244115,0.0013631337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.53824747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.72445226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9399309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026774462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009279228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1587480210","doi":"10.21991/c9g96p","title":"A REVIEW OF THE TAYLOR CASE: USING HUMAN RIGHTS LEGISLATION TO CURB RACIST SPEECH","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Human rights; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.06233473018195917,"score_gpt":0.3263775389393905,"score_spread":0.2640428087574313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1587480210","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000002955922,0.7539269,0.23270188,0.00020472745,0.0028458228,0.0024003792,0.00023610002,0.00016479404,0.007516458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0024660963,0.976791,0.018043816,0.0011075293,0.0004563665,0.0003935144,0.00019371463,0.00005005292,0.0004978566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951256,0.0003517457,0.0018419161,0.0011295794,0.0006924775,0.00085868826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958117,0.00013571588,0.0012536655,0.0017804613,0.00069075736,0.0003277186],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084364304,0.00084447087,0.0016789255,0.0005887244,0.0025796806,0.00016475876,0.001861914,0.00048178842,0.0001230963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028563113,0.00062379043,0.0012454203,0.0020512221,0.0021004716,0.00090753374,0.0009246513,0.0007261036,0.00025502456],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027288045,0.00007823453,0.000004062127,0.006241538,0.0001314434,0.00021413647,0.0000143427005,0.000015429498,0.000004490228,0.8918911,0.0027380802,0.09866439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023301147,0.000050329563,2.4450134e-7,0.057590395,0.0004770057,0.02123663,0.0000067197707,0.00014932577,0.000053044623,0.0031182969,0.9163914,0.0006936159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043933955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002496544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9136533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058801257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020825958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1588628367","doi":"10.21991/c9ct0n","title":"The Turmoil Surrounding the Prorogation of Canada’s 40th Parliament & the Crown","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Politics; Enthusiasm; Population; Monarchy; Constitutional monarchy; Political science; Law; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Psychology; Demography","score_opus":0.03964466136308287,"score_gpt":0.26515102391650464,"score_spread":0.22550636255342177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1588628367","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046234503,0.003988969,0.03004629,0.09875245,0.010327158,0.0031061873,0.0005378032,0.00015479099,0.80685186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961269,0.00007307842,0.00007045071,0.0007758354,0.0002044627,0.00010799409,0.00000769993,0.0000046620085,0.0026289055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997207,0.00024428786,0.00053391454,0.00024525405,0.0009576903,0.0008118802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99808437,0.00065343274,0.00033581408,0.00040060666,0.00036048624,0.00016526936],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015421032,0.0001841884,0.00018789063,0.00002323747,0.0065102726,0.00011967483,0.00072902767,0.000095657495,0.00011157497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013342907,0.00009595577,0.00014101087,0.00027149808,0.010032572,0.00030063282,0.00011692977,0.00023684434,0.000027125307],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025028823,0.000027659642,0.0075942604,0.0000057598836,0.00004666531,0.0000016520537,0.0006923208,0.00003253443,0.000015030917,0.9782542,0.012914495,0.00039038327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002512283,0.000013101586,0.005771344,0.000081241014,0.000029641076,0.000020240512,0.0054815016,0.000035221805,0.000119019904,0.03235669,0.9556638,0.00017698674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.50689274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83087265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9498924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059831253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075416886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W159045234","doi":"10.21991/c9r07f","title":"NAFTA: RECENT CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS, SOVEREIGNTY TODAY, AND THE FUTURE OF FEDERALISM IN MEXICO","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Relations in Latin America","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Sovereignty; Political science; Dual federalism; New Federalism; Political economy; Law and economics; International trade; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.02419977619283936,"score_gpt":0.2858513406560834,"score_spread":0.26165156446324406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W159045234","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055331797,0.0035184831,0.02757869,0.018648319,0.003595305,0.0015858179,0.00037413574,0.000115673996,0.9390504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927262,0.0018843826,0.0032977422,0.0014005576,0.00020430546,0.00012955038,0.000066805755,0.0000073849583,0.0002830779],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99674,0.00033719395,0.00087801565,0.0004736208,0.0009422637,0.00062894064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979978,0.00051296316,0.0004151261,0.00029382508,0.00060037174,0.0001798769],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011997442,0.00030306316,0.0004289852,0.00030708004,0.0017756203,0.00007656169,0.00050528825,0.00023471889,0.0016155852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008865035,0.00025229462,0.00018316999,0.0006198148,0.037303247,0.00076306664,0.00020949192,0.00044585302,0.000059005153],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002523883,0.00015889209,0.017528905,0.000006975115,0.00009169771,0.000010892299,0.00096008973,0.00017816405,0.000007760351,0.97727334,0.001251472,0.0022794434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0052850405,0.000054714394,0.0026983935,0.00021570666,0.000077992874,0.00014149265,0.011276469,0.00043208682,0.00013349339,0.55510724,0.4239998,0.00057759904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00073059206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00082447147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.987193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046889274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023635942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1593030345","doi":"10.21991/c9qm2f","title":"Royal Succession and the Canadian Crown as a Corporation Sole: A Critique of Canada's Succession to the Throne Act, 2013","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Parks Canada; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Ecological succession; Statutory law; Law; Corporate law; Constitution; Throne; Crown (dentistry); Management; Political science; Economics; Politics; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.01039906631768936,"score_gpt":0.26718739993042645,"score_spread":0.2567883336127371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1593030345","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021357369,0.0006434214,0.043972824,0.54007685,0.0017931164,0.0026837436,0.00043094959,0.000090121874,0.3889516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935583,0.00004448654,0.00019208035,0.0044184932,0.00020566428,0.00016219332,0.000048787464,0.0000061034484,0.0013638983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977719,0.00024099278,0.0004278161,0.0003356703,0.0006383112,0.0005852697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998144,0.0003777838,0.00020100741,0.0003309512,0.0004992384,0.00044702014],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001233385,0.00019571326,0.00024250745,0.00009379195,0.0066315355,0.00023682533,0.0005102907,0.00015202818,0.00015844313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010043893,0.00012788133,0.000079145284,0.00037740194,0.0059066103,0.00031932903,0.00014388537,0.00026626914,0.000028444336],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004831378,0.000017958977,0.0024161607,0.000006272335,0.00001534203,0.0000012973156,0.0002901133,0.001015445,0.00002214553,0.95942765,0.036084928,0.000654349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007997252,0.000023937668,0.0015107212,0.00009526298,0.000033511857,0.000018070896,0.0017154885,0.0018352225,0.00010082826,0.023343664,0.9702934,0.00023015808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9707772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97220093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042825364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011850509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99679875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1594513305","doi":"10.21991/c96665","title":"THE CANADIAN CHARTER AS A MODEL FOR ISRAEL'S BASIC LAWS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Appeal; Political science; Politics; Law; Phenomenon; Demographics; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.05953339464986374,"score_gpt":0.28356488204668673,"score_spread":0.224031487396823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1594513305","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016314352,0.0017872271,0.0574914,0.03469278,0.0039392086,0.0021904185,0.0006999159,0.00029824855,0.89726937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99114954,0.00020469351,0.00084953185,0.004329183,0.00038211295,0.0005799043,0.000054602868,0.000012510236,0.0024379457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965927,0.00008441484,0.00055182166,0.0005560268,0.0006885565,0.0015265042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977036,0.0002868033,0.00016889366,0.00033529583,0.0008576485,0.000647758],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000899873,0.00036159786,0.00032163758,0.00019846881,0.018331124,0.00024548452,0.00071999576,0.00029208965,0.00020781334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00097438064,0.0002998268,0.00036224563,0.0003969268,0.016979605,0.00066173525,0.00011522157,0.000289345,0.0005811801],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082912724,0.00005595021,0.0036573457,0.0000034973637,0.00011083159,0.000010202993,0.000757917,0.00008333798,0.0000068083687,0.9843827,0.009644708,0.0012038015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064114336,0.00003970036,0.00022181125,0.000046272915,0.000066754415,0.00003139832,0.0044889203,0.0013624387,0.000026058566,0.43457246,0.55806816,0.00043489362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17119098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7751904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9895181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076149707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011767608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595234002","doi":"10.21991/c9xd3m","title":"THE CHARTER ... IN THE HOLY LAND?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Historical and Archaeological Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Pure land; Political science; History; Archaeology; Law","score_opus":0.06226479516162664,"score_gpt":0.21835346390540408,"score_spread":0.15608866874377744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595234002","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011654063,0.002959559,0.0021435765,0.02342559,0.0031876368,0.00067809166,0.00013814938,0.00014807182,0.9556653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995014,0.00010959719,0.00004503038,0.0025448457,0.00028615497,0.00016317052,0.000015802923,0.000003833721,0.0018175252],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998406,0.00008093312,0.00037730316,0.00026213733,0.00030628417,0.000567375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992152,0.0002810107,0.00008126932,0.00023916794,0.00011400418,0.00006936563],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034314656,0.00021172239,0.00019169961,0.00006144796,0.0034173087,0.00009229061,0.00050151016,0.0000590881,0.0007263417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015109242,0.000102803504,0.00015715728,0.000098012075,0.012083641,0.00025469463,0.00013842472,0.0003001805,0.00050914346],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037296515,0.000097112985,0.0072780335,0.000003194583,0.000025523668,0.000026033254,0.0034356276,0.00000249856,0.000002636461,0.9785138,0.009393312,0.0011849719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039428068,0.0000656735,0.0022732287,0.000022953924,0.000015380994,0.000042723583,0.0057544713,0.000021536534,0.000004090027,0.11791465,0.8732955,0.00019555942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030616042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027053775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006521628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012706053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595268387","doi":"10.21991/c9f96c","title":"Quelques opportunités et défis conceptuels, fonctionnels et politiques du fédéralisme","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political and Social Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.07507436158192901,"score_gpt":0.3546377480954349,"score_spread":0.2795633865135059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595268387","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009048389,0.03154718,0.05153311,0.24669868,0.017622348,0.0011668985,0.0025684654,0.00079720933,0.6390177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.948452,0.00647713,0.0011899371,0.02732532,0.0029798902,0.00012128183,0.00048036978,0.00004251021,0.012931585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99134976,0.0021406119,0.0013118704,0.00072411983,0.0012992579,0.003174383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99487895,0.0010998861,0.00045800343,0.000487508,0.001054454,0.002021202],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003023407,0.00091059884,0.0009733124,0.0003096152,0.0034875956,0.00034466852,0.00071786804,0.0010695545,0.0035767343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002263093,0.0009776581,0.0006590648,0.0008089931,0.029829523,0.00587978,0.0004367129,0.0010097461,0.0015590198],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046301186,0.0007191575,0.016645731,0.000062595296,0.00023653799,0.000028226983,0.0044381726,0.00005006389,0.000037067053,0.94996434,0.026404805,0.0013669956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008940626,0.00010082542,0.0016959809,0.00038379044,0.00026139646,0.0002258204,0.024678776,0.000065837376,0.00015772459,0.18490799,0.78554577,0.0010820527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017009849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002156489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9394036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014215162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005374968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595793275","doi":"10.21991/c98w9t","title":"Jurisdictional Justice, Democracy and the Story of Insite","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Public administration; Law; Downtown; Grassroots; Politics; Charter; Government (linguistics); Political science; Jurisdiction; Business; Medicine","score_opus":0.027600263680548957,"score_gpt":0.30517628435862443,"score_spread":0.27757602067807546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595793275","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44586498,0.02613107,0.1472036,0.07596337,0.009927913,0.004701337,0.0012992739,0.0006908652,0.2882176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946677,0.00026078385,0.0016592366,0.0020685212,0.00047090888,0.000064977015,0.000125388,0.000016411544,0.0006660477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973464,0.00017517478,0.00066790625,0.00036839448,0.00070918066,0.00073292985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99758816,0.000812284,0.00027620615,0.0004533358,0.00043588158,0.0004341437],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010590057,0.00035183146,0.0005853571,0.0002968204,0.0017006816,0.000027150187,0.0001871129,0.0002216015,0.00018829669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011408475,0.00025993216,0.00023520431,0.00039053423,0.012455437,0.00068816636,0.00020878449,0.000694819,0.00018934933],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005723447,0.00024957865,0.0588063,0.000104655664,0.00021604245,0.000009250656,0.00049587473,0.000085377476,0.00048152226,0.9298124,0.007456742,0.0017099563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.048421573,0.0006400028,0.11498823,0.0015235122,0.0061566234,0.013445215,0.052619357,0.004450582,0.002965693,0.06013164,0.6921989,0.0024587235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021251635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011571422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8696807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017468474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012809016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1597300592","doi":"10.21991/c9bd53","title":"An Argument Against Accreditation of Trinity Western University's Proposed Law School","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Accreditation; Consolidation (business); Law; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Management; Library science; Sociology; Medicine; Accounting; Computer science; Ethnology; Economics","score_opus":0.029456278135004763,"score_gpt":0.3230202419182415,"score_spread":0.29356396378323674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1597300592","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07457381,0.00006207005,0.15581524,0.046781536,0.003952448,0.0014574471,0.00031341417,0.00042940397,0.7166146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950843,0.000025709682,0.0019112774,0.0018534767,0.00026133488,0.000009991737,0.00024239128,0.000006220765,0.00060532015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977522,0.00038250256,0.00046851262,0.00036153418,0.00060373294,0.00043150116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976873,0.0003082855,0.00036105613,0.0003418569,0.00095018453,0.00035132337],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010144506,0.00018900975,0.00023619428,0.00026963302,0.0022116138,0.000174015,0.0004225599,0.00019154306,0.0003532772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011663439,0.00021010196,0.00011445725,0.0006791366,0.0050058286,0.002816659,0.000051956868,0.00034365174,0.0001826649],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059650723,0.00030232721,0.011620403,0.000011617428,0.00003609605,0.0000019722804,0.00042515158,0.00043849632,0.00047539215,0.9844044,0.0013047176,0.0009197835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014419003,0.00010619539,0.0018178257,0.00007866665,0.00005980731,0.00000882428,0.010916585,0.00023937976,0.00053971313,0.015230657,0.9691779,0.0003825256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013956822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031053405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9691737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038818098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005109295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1598691393","doi":"10.21991/c9p07t","title":"THE REGULATION OF PRIVATE HEALTH CARE UNDER THE CANADA HEALTH ACT AND THE CANADIAN CHARTER","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Health care; Legislature; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Business; Health policy; Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.030519110586481518,"score_gpt":0.27547434307326224,"score_spread":0.24495523248678072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1598691393","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017350025,0.020373113,0.0015700854,0.85988355,0.004079401,0.004607621,0.0004999144,0.00010693107,0.09152934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939297,0.00041704864,0.000097431075,0.0051836385,0.00009892042,0.000066672044,0.00002533266,0.0000045366864,0.000176718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974941,0.0003823658,0.00047975685,0.00024952894,0.000611082,0.0007831782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839467,0.00035305248,0.00033313668,0.00026162964,0.00036739846,0.00029010506],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011160418,0.00019605234,0.00027276285,0.000036861962,0.015877642,0.000104455576,0.00041479184,0.000084076695,0.00004678103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030356093,0.00010052443,0.00010107538,0.00025267975,0.01578341,0.00023233055,0.00009831568,0.00025459603,0.0000061785554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027521153,0.000005811286,0.0068925507,0.0000088944635,0.00006488323,3.9876596e-7,0.0070100306,0.000034321798,4.800474e-7,0.9782497,0.0066363593,0.0010690038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001439238,0.000043483462,0.097654715,0.00011661403,0.000040385406,0.00002196796,0.102426834,0.00007034325,0.000012944881,0.01795687,0.7798841,0.00033251542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9751762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97657967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017313244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014330699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99125713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1601773008","doi":"10.21991/c9c372","title":"THE DUNMORE DEPARTURE: SECTION 1 AND VULNERABLE GROUPS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Supreme court; Statutory law; Law; Government (linguistics); Political science; High Court; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.023105030115451685,"score_gpt":0.25628191373596904,"score_spread":0.23317688362051736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1601773008","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.063350216,0.00500653,0.05765983,0.02306537,0.012976261,0.0018835806,0.0002962656,0.00068322744,0.8350787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99537647,0.00060397445,0.00040993845,0.0013418923,0.0003271699,0.000085802625,0.00002726903,0.0000069820135,0.0018204942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802774,0.00016389857,0.0003319954,0.00035088952,0.00042680738,0.00069866603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988899,0.00021140708,0.00012494072,0.0002476506,0.00027002615,0.00025607055],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007866042,0.00020382374,0.00016258906,0.000090784924,0.009805048,0.00019599736,0.00028819655,0.0001797388,0.0003492115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004717872,0.0001551176,0.00010076788,0.00035492887,0.0077629746,0.0007282946,0.000118106516,0.0003274136,0.000026575493],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029027575,0.00005853179,0.014331837,0.0000019410004,0.00004772646,0.00000754088,0.0004830171,0.000009264665,0.000035680892,0.97561705,0.0076462138,0.0017321687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005985498,0.000039673898,0.0076781604,0.00003047732,0.00004178633,0.000047780122,0.007112808,0.00005439584,0.00008603616,0.07552443,0.9085017,0.00028424544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016003834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011258744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93202627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015723756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008931075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9949373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1603337498","doi":"10.21991/c9b952","title":"THE PREAMBLE, JUDICIAL INDEPENDANCE AND JUDICIAL INTEGRITY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Preamble; Political science; Law; Computer science; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.04632287987767642,"score_gpt":0.28452991552726187,"score_spread":0.23820703564958545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1603337498","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017773949,0.007265138,0.022709338,0.01689312,0.006677081,0.0014991544,0.00026276833,0.00050566613,0.9264138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958257,0.0013963969,0.0005517446,0.0011235784,0.00063739886,0.00013442141,0.00001670752,0.00000917194,0.0003048533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965015,0.00020956883,0.00064953667,0.00061388063,0.0008952434,0.0011302757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980656,0.0004308031,0.00024425518,0.00028726854,0.0005966658,0.00037543772],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011088039,0.00038001616,0.00038916225,0.00014405957,0.011747104,0.00019763409,0.00060550496,0.00031146416,0.00020849927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014879825,0.00030906982,0.00020583547,0.0005427661,0.032191403,0.00081934227,0.0003522993,0.00064929423,0.00019869467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014187538,0.00009582211,0.037154403,0.000003850033,0.00010575844,0.000020819765,0.0006367754,0.0000033078295,0.000014796794,0.95374733,0.003536387,0.004538866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000941663,0.00008177016,0.010741252,0.00012977528,0.000099473735,0.000095273994,0.008977034,0.000029351839,0.000090078574,0.54320586,0.43498334,0.0006251299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008886754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018804662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9780518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028974217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003134309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1603399318","doi":"10.21991/c9637h","title":"Conacher Missed the Mark on Constitutional Conventions and Fixed Election Dates","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Appeal; Statute; Convention; Political science; Constitution; Jurisprudence; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.0370479173186611,"score_gpt":0.29106634295021544,"score_spread":0.25401842563155436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1603399318","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023673473,0.010951429,0.047089312,0.10238552,0.010786971,0.0030538787,0.0008985454,0.0008430327,0.8003178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99228686,0.00047369266,0.00028812472,0.0046873395,0.00096579915,0.00024446612,0.00014445258,0.000010688357,0.0008985901],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99610853,0.00033143527,0.000653178,0.00057434547,0.0010079923,0.0013245324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975278,0.00088854914,0.00025474187,0.00032089217,0.00049774256,0.0005103235],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012301482,0.00047619568,0.0004236497,0.00024299235,0.009373801,0.0002252308,0.00040351824,0.0003073598,0.00074901973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013464754,0.00038741675,0.00027812773,0.00067255093,0.035869323,0.001090295,0.00018847827,0.00054279,0.00059997145],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009339224,0.00025361546,0.035063062,0.000007164202,0.00018776365,0.000005520955,0.00027288645,0.00005753114,0.0001221919,0.9447552,0.018323537,0.0008581658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013132313,0.00006746112,0.0060735587,0.00014611559,0.0001734733,0.0001850089,0.0060955947,0.000057282967,0.00018521582,0.05639707,0.9286094,0.00069659884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008450248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005400803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9686134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004504931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020110374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1604506782","doi":"10.21991/c9j08z","title":"WHITE PICKET FENCES: RECOGNIZING ABORIGINAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN AUSTRALIA’S PSYCHOLOGICAL TERRA NULLIUS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Picketing; White (mutation); Property (philosophy); Property rights; White paper; Law; Political science; History; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.07533235578248645,"score_gpt":0.34960530383390626,"score_spread":0.2742729480514198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1604506782","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13120623,0.00018224971,0.0046945615,0.0016365257,0.005164047,0.0016911064,0.0001217251,0.00027878783,0.85502476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872283,0.0004197001,0.0035683017,0.0002824114,0.00048606706,0.00005766431,0.000101827995,0.0000085972015,0.0078471415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995571,0.000359104,0.0009113133,0.00086529204,0.0006995917,0.0015936628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982687,0.00010252166,0.0002790688,0.0003812751,0.00044808182,0.0005203438],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011889703,0.00041577537,0.00044506125,0.00043540186,0.00822564,0.00013325605,0.00067782024,0.000519059,0.0027974718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037409685,0.00029666856,0.00019355681,0.00078463415,0.008441952,0.0012438154,0.000008041479,0.0006030917,0.00080451294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097654294,0.0005644937,0.04770098,0.000017615712,0.00002468546,0.00006243799,0.017123297,0.00001519403,0.0000017082663,0.93283355,0.0013540608,0.00020429995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011012913,0.00014770581,0.0059543164,0.00027310182,0.000034735072,0.00017445219,0.005007961,0.000017131246,0.00004930132,0.05724202,0.9292764,0.00072159723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08871196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5235932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9279223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071734225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013752847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1605094561","doi":"10.21991/c9x68f","title":"Cooperative Federalism in Search of a Normative Justification: Considering the Principle of Federal Loyalty","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Loyalty; Normative; Political science; Federal law; Law; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology; Legislation; Politics","score_opus":0.03309826142050176,"score_gpt":0.3159430235126354,"score_spread":0.28284476209213366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1605094561","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40158665,0.0015129269,0.15216,0.027976943,0.002711106,0.0035141169,0.0003715137,0.00018428959,0.40998244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989593,0.0000368414,0.00030982474,0.00031406383,0.00012872981,0.00005874303,0.000020045527,0.0000052471282,0.00016721056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99738485,0.00037171278,0.00079679734,0.0002934748,0.0006623683,0.0004907817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977965,0.00056202366,0.00031619568,0.00022985222,0.00097470445,0.000120739875],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014740545,0.00018863121,0.00041209656,0.00016107764,0.0017720545,0.0001008263,0.0003737702,0.00015340623,0.00010542354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015564224,0.00015217815,0.000119661134,0.00062576623,0.0089133335,0.0006322287,0.00012346108,0.00027234745,0.00002442024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040484134,0.000081635735,0.022151627,0.000054065225,0.000032230142,0.000001632717,0.002198815,0.0030225299,0.0002373732,0.971685,0.00025314125,0.00024145826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008782323,0.0005547586,0.018662661,0.0029143644,0.0001647264,0.0001552752,0.10067571,0.009671791,0.017435022,0.12489007,0.7137905,0.002302847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043673324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062557296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84679496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019167327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026898065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1605711693","doi":"10.21991/c9bq1p","title":"Canada's Re-emerging Division of Powers and the Unrealized Force of Reciprocal Interjurisdictional Immunity","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Political science; Supreme court; Reciprocal; Separation of powers; Government (linguistics); Law; Law and economics; Qualified immunity; Public administration; Sociology; Constitution","score_opus":0.0235577028077574,"score_gpt":0.2628474321849137,"score_spread":0.23928972937715628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1605711693","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08116443,0.006367398,0.07211532,0.017345719,0.0044331676,0.0020227155,0.0010631192,0.00015972005,0.8153284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986259,0.00036630206,0.0003379113,0.00042311582,0.00006224854,0.000040857005,0.000027857892,0.0000049431574,0.00011087341],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973697,0.00023449321,0.0007716318,0.00030519447,0.0008306988,0.0004882817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801195,0.0005491766,0.00039881718,0.00022569712,0.0006535806,0.00016077858],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010213808,0.00023988953,0.000483736,0.00014293769,0.0023830233,0.000020218518,0.00041500828,0.00013327136,0.00022503681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010853531,0.00018752491,0.00020329925,0.00044078488,0.025163827,0.00034962955,0.00028016706,0.00025822135,0.0000035271544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004102488,0.0000730748,0.020485263,0.000012803236,0.00016216135,0.0000039122224,0.0010712194,0.000048405043,0.000045426168,0.9760245,0.0010215811,0.00064142194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011440903,0.00027005008,0.030588916,0.001224372,0.000481457,0.00010661894,0.079568155,0.00046386287,0.001656803,0.68567365,0.18707557,0.0014496406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5264232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3451331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91746145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023249623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049795555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99891573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1606111470","doi":"10.21991/c9395w","title":"CANADIAN CONSTITUTIONALISM AND SOVEREIGNTY AFTER NAFTA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Sovereignty; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.027503341842709927,"score_gpt":0.24695094003863108,"score_spread":0.21944759819592116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1606111470","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00870481,0.0042845295,0.0076164594,0.009592852,0.0028170638,0.000961354,0.0008395849,0.00033004396,0.9648533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935999,0.0005862461,0.0010188777,0.0036017266,0.00034600872,0.00020892968,0.00006623251,0.000011805344,0.00056026253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963281,0.00014342202,0.000613436,0.0007545967,0.0007608147,0.0013995938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99769527,0.00015293522,0.00015156518,0.00030301412,0.0006128382,0.001084358],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005858397,0.0004670417,0.0004436593,0.00044681164,0.0052547413,0.00015963575,0.0004208074,0.0003860114,0.0038648713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005719051,0.00048213577,0.00022708894,0.00055971125,0.022775302,0.0011114349,0.00020749215,0.00037624303,0.0005115661],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007378714,0.00007736257,0.060591415,0.00000664043,0.00011635115,0.00013253199,0.0006258324,0.00000597398,0.0000047035223,0.93515,0.002502034,0.00071335625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010286159,0.00004838931,0.008576932,0.000160745,0.00012250576,0.00025997052,0.006929197,0.000018921333,0.000034637716,0.41549096,0.5663682,0.00096091087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18614033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28258458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9848951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067524967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008160675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1607709240","doi":"10.21991/c9nw97","title":"R. V. BADGER: ONE STEP FORWARD AND TWO STEPS BACK?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Badger; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.05258002054209482,"score_gpt":0.26644261940659725,"score_spread":0.21386259886450243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1607709240","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0135552725,0.0010184892,0.023882085,0.003934125,0.002058395,0.0005018321,0.00020240639,0.00018797659,0.9546594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904976,0.0001612734,0.0035298637,0.001632796,0.0002850862,0.000038604405,0.000028220666,0.000008403692,0.003818166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976987,0.000086161795,0.0004712329,0.0004865165,0.00029817398,0.0009591852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871033,0.00012336303,0.00011876574,0.00023413321,0.00015879578,0.0006546273],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047500103,0.0002568498,0.00035471463,0.00016218894,0.0023495022,0.00007968051,0.00030291328,0.00019295602,0.0030610596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002133995,0.0002704734,0.00017134042,0.00015889875,0.011134987,0.0007822831,0.00012818298,0.00022794976,0.0013589605],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047376918,0.00011765731,0.009915122,0.000011709009,0.000056654844,0.000010324001,0.00047464017,0.0000029168589,0.000017079305,0.9810034,0.0054321494,0.0029109565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015349437,0.000068970934,0.0009483073,0.00008354869,0.00006698684,0.000059020495,0.0032299324,0.00008709079,0.00007109136,0.099850275,0.8934397,0.0005600924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019229862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019213494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9769423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026995357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012461197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W160939063","doi":"10.21991/c9m65h","title":"NAFTA AND INEQUALITY: A CANADIAN PERSPECTIVE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Perspective (graphical); Economics; Political science; Economic geography; Regional science; Geography; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06069222846449993,"score_gpt":0.2872167756640481,"score_spread":0.22652454719954815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W160939063","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017998377,0.000467902,0.0061884765,0.012522624,0.001955921,0.00056378427,0.00015157781,0.00016384857,0.95998746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952696,0.00013055945,0.0011012872,0.0022485356,0.000095421994,0.00005189468,0.000021977905,0.0000055904834,0.001075108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982223,0.00007424637,0.00033648583,0.00042087506,0.00022727982,0.0007187997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986954,0.00005936149,0.0000885687,0.00017695274,0.00029524005,0.0006844833],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005608433,0.00019504603,0.0002116367,0.00031231472,0.0022778097,0.000101537036,0.00022407658,0.00016832002,0.002175933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004376284,0.00021515522,0.00008641504,0.00024862707,0.005248036,0.0005844101,0.00008752304,0.00017584238,0.00047781097],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017197863,0.000033140732,0.03699088,0.0000023023092,0.000037588456,0.000016427097,0.0034353693,0.000003332749,0.00000265473,0.9564568,0.00085988216,0.0021444592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009987127,0.00003540556,0.010361348,0.000066696535,0.000035818364,0.00011296878,0.07701738,0.00008083728,0.00001479953,0.10147177,0.8091231,0.0006811519],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19175132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42244038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97727126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011276344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005989549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W160993039","doi":"10.21991/c9bm1n","title":"CANADA AS A SOCIAL EXPERIMENT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.025605316115601306,"score_gpt":0.24131920692817554,"score_spread":0.21571389081257425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W160993039","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029756974,0.0007311546,0.0020022194,0.0072104763,0.0033565937,0.00041783214,0.00028657875,0.00014953478,0.9828699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98953325,0.000048070335,0.00021749618,0.0027419582,0.00028892935,0.000074076655,0.00003710969,0.000007792592,0.007051295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976876,0.000081898565,0.00035848652,0.00038217378,0.000706657,0.0007832103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989623,0.000043695905,0.00012721447,0.00018981,0.0002467921,0.00043022158],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023837273,0.00019310733,0.0002290242,0.00031738225,0.006579563,0.0001907563,0.00039550522,0.00017345471,0.006774176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023306391,0.00025859996,0.00016123976,0.00035814068,0.01019973,0.00050792075,0.00008045461,0.00021072147,0.00046229974],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024857296,0.000058955462,0.00053829973,0.000004031924,0.00003835628,0.00008656347,0.0013534597,0.0000029956764,0.000025131472,0.8905986,0.106651574,0.00061719574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004297634,0.000016633674,0.00024751437,0.00002127191,0.000026012052,0.000055624907,0.008619887,0.000003342274,0.00007047813,0.010946804,0.9792174,0.00034523554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98931783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9964352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9865576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030826116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03788528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W161343513","doi":"10.21991/c9dt0z","title":"SHAPING CANADA'S FUTURE TOGETHER OR A DOOMED ATTEMPT TO ESCAPE FROM REALITY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06111320205127533,"score_gpt":0.28661522750443214,"score_spread":0.2255020254531568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W161343513","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04499002,0.00166532,0.030300604,0.35451406,0.01321711,0.0030696879,0.017073613,0.0005884357,0.5345811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736535,0.00005510954,0.0010019824,0.021331549,0.0010668958,0.00009181834,0.00007520622,0.000012933418,0.002710992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968033,0.00013500887,0.00051987934,0.00064415345,0.0007818199,0.0011158691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980192,0.000169107,0.00019256545,0.00044906748,0.00028232994,0.0008877058],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038870866,0.0003298867,0.00037071545,0.00013438842,0.0021838204,0.00009928944,0.0006461968,0.00026214813,0.0029209426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00073431904,0.0003178052,0.00015342764,0.0006310091,0.0029076522,0.00051313645,0.00013312661,0.00029537026,0.00020462163],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001277205,0.00003847001,0.0060257777,0.0000055089135,0.00005829937,0.00007570918,0.00108978,0.000023393166,0.000020344693,0.797033,0.19435295,0.0011490266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005816671,0.00002397117,0.005904892,0.00011664513,0.000032600412,0.000024980545,0.0036879436,0.000019079607,0.00008901335,0.009147591,0.97985506,0.0005165593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95477927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9937708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9286635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012346469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014420418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W161486715","doi":"10.21991/c9cq2c","title":"CONSTITUTIONAL LIMBO IN TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO (THE UNCERTAINTY, NOT THE DANCE)*","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Variety (cybernetics); Dance; Style (visual arts); Politics; Constitutional crisis; Law; Political science; History; Art; Archaeology; Computer science; Literature","score_opus":0.05186781107398396,"score_gpt":0.28046183798764945,"score_spread":0.22859402691366548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W161486715","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028617486,0.006283088,0.01567537,0.10185182,0.00546704,0.0030472828,0.0005059276,0.00040297082,0.838149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99196476,0.00077420153,0.00025459568,0.0060526957,0.0003906777,0.00029405963,0.000029394016,0.000006541649,0.00023306011],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959972,0.00032643,0.000821073,0.0006963582,0.0010041526,0.0011548008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977495,0.00081918534,0.0002511108,0.00040330313,0.00043751238,0.0003393781],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015353023,0.0004496795,0.00046543762,0.00016708054,0.0067558996,0.00018003817,0.00084638305,0.00026432474,0.00041385577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017562687,0.00031135284,0.0002497316,0.00090725586,0.06421056,0.0007497718,0.00040123393,0.00064504053,0.00022221795],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014628386,0.00014243915,0.037629433,0.000005407328,0.00009402472,0.00003557446,0.0011059922,0.00018112556,0.000016070435,0.9564286,0.0021595357,0.0020555344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020290199,0.00008205398,0.0139445495,0.00021857195,0.00012739578,0.00024452666,0.01959824,0.00015243757,0.00006645211,0.25767633,0.7050036,0.00085679087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006785394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014516109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9633473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004159367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036134156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W16329920","doi":"10.21991/c9gw89","title":"A CHANGE IN CHARGE REQUIRES A SECOND CHANCE TO CONSULT COUNSEL","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Business Law and Ethics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charge (physics); Psychology; Law; Political science; Physics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.07368352937698322,"score_gpt":0.2598297387862969,"score_spread":0.18614620940931367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W16329920","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1708636,0.0027394234,0.047078744,0.036222905,0.01411138,0.0059421724,0.00076674024,0.0015568506,0.7207182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9745329,0.000033276763,0.0005079573,0.023150625,0.0007429954,0.0004977463,0.00012635598,0.000025824294,0.00038229636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968025,0.000018494738,0.0007470585,0.0007784238,0.0005248524,0.0011286522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984376,0.000069062815,0.00027215655,0.0004729391,0.0006505724,0.00009766793],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005806233,0.0005031643,0.00051200524,0.0007671461,0.00081851234,0.00020499626,0.000559723,0.00032000043,0.0023841632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004009149,0.0005091973,0.00016582618,0.0012944305,0.0024641347,0.0031390311,0.00034112614,0.00043383677,0.0027602492],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017380247,0.00021801717,0.037054878,0.00012726773,0.00003161446,0.00009060053,0.00018012029,0.000012759624,0.00016182086,0.9553955,0.0056589013,0.0008946802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003234282,0.000041213807,0.014883913,0.00082407176,0.000072613046,0.00016488424,0.0006778905,0.0016308632,0.00025705245,0.044816084,0.93188375,0.0015134068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014445961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041224496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9262248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015535484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004982932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W163994311","doi":"10.21991/c9qs9t","title":"SOVEREIGNTY POSTPONED: ON THE CANADIAN WAY OF LOSING A REFERENDUM, AND THEN ANOTHER","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Interdisciplinary Cultural and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Sovereignty; Political science; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.075331397607275,"score_gpt":0.2769553579604265,"score_spread":0.20162396035315147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W163994311","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030129585,0.00031884777,0.00023149088,0.013328992,0.0006855658,0.00046526946,0.00019882547,0.0000500671,0.95459133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99767727,0.000056230103,0.00011996718,0.0013340688,0.00010496539,0.000026137062,0.000010480331,0.000004901203,0.00066600146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984513,0.00012082147,0.00027966977,0.00025678732,0.00035748482,0.0005339598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991593,0.00013789536,0.00012223407,0.00015132186,0.00026888735,0.00016036985],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042139812,0.00019131006,0.00022103988,0.00009818854,0.005229427,0.00006175236,0.00026763775,0.00016343498,0.0008070196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026417125,0.00012878465,0.00012588869,0.00020383511,0.009220377,0.0002782297,0.00010630627,0.00020639224,0.00006363967],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004446282,0.000038134578,0.0039767358,0.0000038573125,0.00007007848,0.0000061277733,0.005476399,0.0000022184024,0.00003402119,0.9879754,0.0019635295,0.0004090136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012685647,0.00031600826,0.013677428,0.0005207973,0.00015230782,0.000059696897,0.08620964,0.000041123283,0.0011271819,0.7132075,0.18231443,0.0011053123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.070665255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19596411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96754766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029436752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001039754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1652167591","doi":"10.21991/c9ft08","title":"BEADS AND TRINKETS TAKE ON NEW FORM IN FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL PROPOSALS FOR ABORIGINAL PEOPLES IN CANADA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.03219861674361356,"score_gpt":0.2795373486055785,"score_spread":0.24733873186196492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1652167591","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2545582,0.0046978355,0.041538768,0.030771432,0.008538628,0.0079619875,0.0022010126,0.00039614586,0.649336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99577576,0.0003692013,0.001581358,0.001377399,0.00028703248,0.00030072013,0.00008091373,0.000009931467,0.0002176824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959751,0.00010803574,0.00091730396,0.000799794,0.00085709867,0.0013426663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820286,0.00058169046,0.00021199977,0.00020163208,0.0003204625,0.00048136275],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006306388,0.00049353705,0.0006438156,0.00043783046,0.002200085,0.00010070708,0.0004026382,0.00024606634,0.00022228679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000837182,0.00049805344,0.00016498432,0.00064626284,0.009576722,0.00078338844,0.00009397686,0.00040005625,0.0000302669],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032434452,0.00014630634,0.21957818,0.00001457732,0.000043935266,0.00005484133,0.00046841538,0.00007813257,0.000011608378,0.7760543,0.0020034725,0.001221869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014597125,0.0004815872,0.10023275,0.0016467329,0.000119919554,0.0002996602,0.03028057,0.00030386084,0.00037462675,0.5055644,0.34299025,0.003108541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7304971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9690748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74121755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002644293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041880246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W166998204","doi":"10.21991/c9p654","title":"IT'S THE LAW OF THE LAND: GENDER AND THE GEOGRAPHY OF HOPE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Literature and Culture","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Land law; Economic geography; Law; Political science; Land tenure; Archaeology; Agriculture","score_opus":0.021040776530191034,"score_gpt":0.19908630078201775,"score_spread":0.1780455242518267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W166998204","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004838081,0.004192458,0.0009831742,0.006501781,0.001347078,0.0007085339,0.000541381,0.00003682928,0.9808507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994477,0.000049301427,0.000055421915,0.004981187,0.00012201215,0.000036746136,0.00001510894,0.0000046674663,0.00025856463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880654,0.000089406974,0.0003795937,0.00018726295,0.00028091998,0.0002562604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894875,0.0001231459,0.00025025554,0.00035922957,0.00027451912,0.000044083532],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024241173,0.00019108085,0.00025529868,0.00004227573,0.0014134254,0.000057968315,0.00040010735,0.00006563615,0.0005013855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004869901,0.00008105888,0.00027745587,0.00010645859,0.035091948,0.00025546705,0.00015281352,0.0002334977,0.000008820833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009048692,0.000046636633,0.006377004,0.000015975716,0.00014995535,8.61863e-7,0.0051674605,0.00000801308,0.00000732808,0.98348457,0.0045902533,0.00006148642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020194354,0.000061577324,0.0024787686,0.00014995359,0.00031291967,0.00012880487,0.01753828,0.000036368852,0.00022202748,0.10616469,0.8705767,0.00031050405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038259968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032565437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9896389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009413598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019881937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W167087539","doi":"10.21991/c9z38q","title":"UNBALANCED BALANCING: BILL C-46, \"LIKELY RELEVANCE,\" AND STAGE-ONE BALANCING","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Behavioral and Psychological Studies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Stage (stratigraphy); Computer science; Political science; Geology; Law; Paleontology","score_opus":0.15141700479720835,"score_gpt":0.30333767773354287,"score_spread":0.15192067293633452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W167087539","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26160303,0.010764492,0.07845094,0.0073402156,0.012725655,0.0024492755,0.0013429935,0.00153318,0.6237902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914587,0.00020995465,0.0025763945,0.00201688,0.00019200171,0.00022091657,0.000074264746,0.00002154325,0.003229301],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962835,0.00011545204,0.0008349229,0.0010916337,0.00042525318,0.0012492726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99823374,0.00021010204,0.00030995326,0.0005590002,0.0002769701,0.0004102217],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039636402,0.0005733345,0.0006770506,0.00021594549,0.0012759346,0.00006726977,0.00039736996,0.0004061518,0.0026411214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022933984,0.0004506584,0.00022260926,0.00047735163,0.0057618436,0.00046499044,0.00026991995,0.0005802975,0.0008910865],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002715069,0.00039399427,0.18530682,0.00001915932,0.00015826996,0.00010579766,0.0002820403,0.0000067823903,0.0006124941,0.80256975,0.006555928,0.0037174597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00984296,0.0011058745,0.42280993,0.00060801214,0.00042972024,0.0014500011,0.007369704,0.000071844384,0.0008459399,0.074060656,0.4782515,0.003153894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005377151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011092625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7298557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001436654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025545497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W167095493","doi":"10.21991/c9vh4d","title":"THE CHARTER AND RACISM","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Charter; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.02777080619110751,"score_gpt":0.26956867866812123,"score_spread":0.24179787247701373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W167095493","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013867605,0.00092554215,0.03727396,0.01740972,0.0038923214,0.0006857159,0.00009530894,0.00022299534,0.9256268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956991,0.00024454086,0.00042818286,0.0009571549,0.0002115825,0.000053859636,0.000020130492,0.0000043870227,0.002381079],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847543,0.00008090282,0.00029042902,0.00025474082,0.00042529876,0.00047320715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990983,0.0001801598,0.000112625625,0.0001550011,0.00029590033,0.00015802571],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005405873,0.00014695185,0.000115811985,0.00007489779,0.004274893,0.00014289057,0.00026743623,0.00011920794,0.00028867827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003441468,0.00011538387,0.00008938108,0.00014140893,0.0072391653,0.000634064,0.00007703857,0.00015822388,0.00023715128],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027001746,0.000029319162,0.009156396,0.0000015717081,0.000028439998,0.0000053103763,0.0004453526,0.0000018518282,0.000019706826,0.9853992,0.0023046173,0.002581247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047496456,0.000025709327,0.004622172,0.00003527041,0.000022309372,0.000050564235,0.003005696,0.00008652889,0.0001254284,0.18278034,0.8085255,0.0002455184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00062939455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017482882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9818315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011616594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006878455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W167291807","doi":"10.21991/c9s953","title":"UNDERSTANDING GROOTBOOM — A RESPONSE TO CASS R. SUNSTEIN","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Enforcement; Political science; Law; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Human rights; Order (exchange); Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.17536705212009115,"score_gpt":0.32126896627456664,"score_spread":0.14590191415447548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W167291807","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006815494,0.0004367022,0.28771406,0.009835881,0.003827361,0.001275193,0.00024510178,0.000656878,0.6891933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990714,0.000013335109,0.004973273,0.0016313475,0.00023859502,0.00011929244,0.000018909162,0.000020052881,0.0022711896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956781,0.00042382785,0.0006591784,0.0007521142,0.0010413782,0.0014453599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975587,0.00045321378,0.0001820489,0.00054839236,0.00037625534,0.00088135106],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016796553,0.00040175577,0.0004094856,0.0005269047,0.0036656037,0.00020212786,0.0008257457,0.000347305,0.0014636839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024347089,0.00042875027,0.00025901032,0.0011283475,0.009150009,0.0010115706,0.00030656633,0.000388396,0.0017399107],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058798026,0.000108181164,0.008752104,0.0000062611794,0.0000586718,0.00012808488,0.009325098,0.000048329963,0.00016999517,0.97388387,0.0068485755,0.00008283732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001280842,0.00016069594,0.00035963417,0.00017790767,0.00006862947,0.00007732802,0.041422375,0.000047692243,0.00034005567,0.06246512,0.89266163,0.0009381057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016051981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024318723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9838985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024989098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032795295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1674892408","doi":"10.21991/c9v361","title":"A CAP ON CAP","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ice caps; Geology; Paleontology","score_opus":0.050280746431130674,"score_gpt":0.25355596068543085,"score_spread":0.20327521425430017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1674892408","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025556773,0.0009297395,0.040676482,0.0015981364,0.0044437884,0.0017593395,0.0021009396,0.0018284938,0.9211063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922314,0.000021662147,0.0029468327,0.0025790231,0.0002516157,0.0003049449,0.00032441207,0.00007123237,0.0012688314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99409544,0.00015047406,0.0011037015,0.0013210159,0.0011948595,0.0021345282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99682,0.00018756333,0.00040439266,0.0011849018,0.0006377094,0.00076545385],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061549275,0.00092066784,0.00070895354,0.0008769879,0.0022492846,0.00012288189,0.0009315554,0.0004513291,0.0037920077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068084785,0.00089906494,0.0005582292,0.0009926106,0.01162626,0.0012213247,0.00036277957,0.0007671887,0.03047437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045107794,0.00065917755,0.0133339055,0.000019438028,0.00020408735,0.00020599668,0.00013995483,0.00030843506,0.0012788158,0.94573843,0.03715666,0.0005039901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008949228,0.0007901816,0.006177775,0.00076297,0.00039115944,0.003269678,0.0030624124,0.001388955,0.014076904,0.13452178,0.82280344,0.0038055063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033498937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035584727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9666747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072633475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024370535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W167806711","doi":"10.21991/c97q24","title":"REPRESENTATION BY TERRITORY: A PROPOSAL FOR SENATE REFORM","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Political science; Public administration; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.01910466181290454,"score_gpt":0.25044022210594524,"score_spread":0.2313355602930407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W167806711","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027237998,0.0003354765,0.2033918,0.009733806,0.003998778,0.003482571,0.0016191358,0.0006968149,0.7495036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98049533,0.000011144895,0.015099098,0.00091880374,0.00011717788,0.00042318174,0.00048165346,0.000019798832,0.0024337855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743277,0.00004612188,0.00055792497,0.00069309195,0.00057949184,0.00069059135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999048,0.000057219884,0.00021083203,0.00035327135,0.00011545539,0.0002152068],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028270253,0.00033623583,0.0002795566,0.00009482265,0.0008730481,0.000070066184,0.00047165144,0.00019094012,0.0020893372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001711143,0.00032195228,0.00021967232,0.00023016451,0.004142122,0.0012164124,0.00027198394,0.0001873497,0.00092400704],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016749215,0.00020401255,0.016473945,0.00001081103,0.000059480848,0.000011382714,0.00006672931,0.000058146095,0.004151628,0.9399414,0.038140777,0.0007141808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004841798,0.00043057196,0.0040274193,0.00021442403,0.00016891901,0.0006867527,0.0015354754,0.0038946937,0.06916578,0.32308102,0.59008205,0.0018710862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013715824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046511108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9532574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00084794534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002751952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1683029314","doi":"10.21991/c99095","title":"Les droits linguistiques et la Charte : vingt-cinq années de progression vers l’égalité? Une perspective de l’Ouest canadien","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.024295955521158152,"score_gpt":0.30266230978655145,"score_spread":0.2783663542653933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1683029314","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028609755,0.012728367,0.007148883,0.021212738,0.0052335425,0.00087223423,0.0013399109,0.00034574693,0.92250884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893003,0.0011286302,0.0013548621,0.0008875335,0.00057646265,0.00009702557,0.00006731806,0.000027446216,0.0065604206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995844,0.00056059385,0.0005963885,0.0007890541,0.0006120938,0.001597855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972279,0.00023596313,0.00034929469,0.0003505467,0.0008082158,0.0010280967],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012890035,0.00047736734,0.0004835003,0.0007006138,0.0056398683,0.00039958037,0.0005964422,0.0007021294,0.0009012466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001347572,0.0006364644,0.00037549163,0.00082183623,0.02967828,0.0009823833,0.0001436794,0.00081931555,0.00021190914],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000816574,0.0002811178,0.0138274655,0.00006353116,0.00015913381,0.0005464938,0.018546082,0.00007293952,0.00002943009,0.9571325,0.0061229593,0.0031366725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086414715,0.00015746284,0.0042309277,0.0010025008,0.00023347934,0.00064759294,0.026764665,0.00013286584,0.00006285596,0.09434734,0.87068856,0.00086761196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8296836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8855599,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96069056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00795766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021158053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99960864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1687549501","doi":"10.21991/c9b66d","title":"ABORTION INJUNCTION VACATED: DAIGLE V. TREMBLAY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.04865781522963771,"score_gpt":0.2839896291338976,"score_spread":0.23533181390425986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1687549501","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006654745,0.0006876568,0.0346387,0.002324195,0.0038158926,0.00047330136,0.00011092422,0.00044170851,0.9508529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99358964,0.00060399016,0.000933721,0.0012311055,0.00036253312,0.000059073267,0.00009172217,0.000012058196,0.003116149],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974703,0.0001484246,0.0005426421,0.00048775293,0.0006755325,0.0006753521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858963,0.00008495196,0.00021425908,0.00024483065,0.0006156914,0.00025063648],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005223792,0.00027687586,0.0002502928,0.00025764233,0.002729936,0.000092834736,0.00039493662,0.00017293853,0.0014761142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005254988,0.0002756959,0.0002124818,0.00045143717,0.0058361753,0.0011548869,0.00011617388,0.00025327026,0.0013611736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071238785,0.00016371437,0.015553508,0.0000049054242,0.00008193362,0.000015577953,0.0005497311,0.000023717925,0.00008907328,0.9692396,0.012487197,0.0017198334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008202999,0.00008205219,0.0048214626,0.00008491873,0.000057784546,0.000040994597,0.004195827,0.00006068487,0.00041531844,0.03244876,0.956494,0.00047794983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011026673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014345979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9869349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004143859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00096257386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1700671006","doi":"10.21991/c9vw8q","title":"A REMEDY FOR THE NINETIES: SCHACHTER V. R. AND HAIG & BIRCH V. CANADA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.04796089876755093,"score_gpt":0.2701920002024005,"score_spread":0.22223110143484953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1700671006","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0092162965,0.019842489,0.20299877,0.14496051,0.014528709,0.006131736,0.0019238803,0.00070335786,0.59969425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876273,0.0004821633,0.0020538142,0.0038593337,0.00035152244,0.00025600084,0.000049531038,0.000009201792,0.005311125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792385,0.00007140668,0.00034113796,0.00039431348,0.00052752177,0.00074178976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985636,0.00035565908,0.00012647628,0.00028032294,0.00043108387,0.00024285693],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005736171,0.00024054176,0.00022308686,0.000020426243,0.0051973313,0.000109376626,0.00043134377,0.00022532424,0.00046521524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00062320894,0.00017969725,0.00015818294,0.0002628169,0.009685245,0.00040030235,0.0001130413,0.00026101252,0.000026545105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003516999,0.000030281075,0.005255546,0.000011780051,0.0000860814,0.0000025015156,0.0016609873,0.000014939966,0.000012945743,0.9055296,0.08682898,0.0005311714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006012931,0.000017770231,0.00040087648,0.000047077876,0.000065673215,0.000035524667,0.013115662,0.00003198399,0.000043253694,0.023818325,0.96152824,0.00029429398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1148312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6264498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.978411,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026361336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004179623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99609774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1706456921","doi":"10.21991/c92t0v","title":"A FLAWED SYNTHESIS OF THE LAW","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.04015784934388064,"score_gpt":0.27051136580826407,"score_spread":0.23035351646438343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1706456921","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053176833,0.0001674994,0.012203467,0.007186514,0.0009951376,0.00067363627,0.00025621068,0.00012931228,0.97307056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972157,0.000025638816,0.0012447694,0.00078013976,0.00008579695,0.00012727677,0.000005259531,0.0000056034587,0.00050983333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982495,0.00010829452,0.00042072753,0.00028036768,0.00046822513,0.0004729138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987405,0.00018336352,0.00020541968,0.0004261981,0.00028488654,0.00015965608],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003987882,0.00016374304,0.0002104268,0.00006148991,0.0025569405,0.000038624083,0.0006816386,0.00014940175,0.0005711759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046630797,0.00012857396,0.0002639378,0.0004381317,0.013949689,0.00039599068,0.0001821469,0.00017796391,0.00014137624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014088587,0.000108222805,0.005958565,0.0000064041064,0.000035937956,0.0000013136186,0.0004080609,0.000020239991,0.0001343678,0.99193484,0.000977725,0.0004002582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005389617,0.000020463265,0.001951439,0.00016658656,0.00012407037,0.000031950665,0.0064348285,0.00008163768,0.006571634,0.16270293,0.8209239,0.00045154218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035030248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034430232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.991898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001345895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015008913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99874157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W174120049","doi":"10.21991/c95m2g","title":"INVERTING IMAGE AND REALITY: R. V. SHARPE AND THE MORAL PANIC AROUND CHILD PORNOGRAPHY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Child pornography; Supreme court; Moral panic; Pornography; Fantasy; Meaning (existential); Law; Dissent; Psychology; Politics; Sociology; Criminology; Social psychology; Political science; Art; The Internet; Literature","score_opus":0.05404433395630701,"score_gpt":0.29461359251612573,"score_spread":0.24056925855981873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W174120049","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3573583,0.010586112,0.02636163,0.019747311,0.005011803,0.0027774721,0.0007704314,0.0011904878,0.57619643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965804,0.00010653113,0.0006697754,0.0020075485,0.000117742275,0.00019240002,0.0000796557,0.0000173948,0.0002285589],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971349,0.00018667647,0.00072636345,0.0008183826,0.0002800247,0.00085362146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984415,0.00019998795,0.000278275,0.0006864841,0.00017031356,0.00022341138],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000760056,0.0004323243,0.00051036355,0.0003318945,0.0016721468,0.00010517255,0.00039769756,0.00038416064,0.00038759664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002485663,0.0003434883,0.00018750067,0.00043036326,0.022146398,0.00047695625,0.000373536,0.0006193789,0.00009176561],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029055955,0.0001517076,0.11899601,0.000012456984,0.00017007669,0.000063022904,0.00045121225,3.1957904e-7,0.000045119927,0.8768238,0.0012176195,0.0017781191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.021279294,0.000557649,0.14765356,0.00033620297,0.0010435171,0.013386904,0.032344572,0.0004639001,0.0003166103,0.67116207,0.10900212,0.0024536094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010423239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029056324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6392221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052960135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019221498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W174660321","doi":"10.21991/c9hh3x","title":"STARVING IN THE SHADOW OF LAW: A COMMENT ON FINLAY V. CANADA (MINISTER OF FINANCE)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Shadow (psychology); Political science; Law; Economic history; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.045176162093215226,"score_gpt":0.21153368760219687,"score_spread":0.16635752550898164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W174660321","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05225882,0.0011623253,0.0045404835,0.005695089,0.0026234025,0.0009916932,0.0023702644,0.000020796635,0.93033713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948079,0.000049929637,0.00018548615,0.0047627236,0.000051706724,0.000055343917,0.000038595903,0.000008118159,0.00004017365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976563,0.000035602985,0.0013552275,0.00038388182,0.000116484756,0.00045249893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985696,0.00015664646,0.0006678104,0.00046473785,0.00007853177,0.00006266045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062344666,0.00020693435,0.0006145463,0.00017724073,0.0002779803,0.000021251095,0.00050166884,0.00012448063,0.00021814127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010606349,0.00022257524,0.00017676424,0.00018463131,0.0024294932,0.0002518281,0.00008645196,0.00018903987,0.000051028263],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057902325,0.00018536445,0.05678077,0.00003306413,0.000048001886,0.000009426741,0.00028573186,0.00033664738,0.0000029094567,0.93837774,0.0038387002,0.000043735025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034895015,0.0003829416,0.0151822455,0.0005322643,0.000030992946,0.00007026286,0.0027554266,0.0008641319,0.0006656492,0.5566091,0.41846466,0.0009528272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26690724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18583852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9425491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030892252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065616146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90763545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W175016376","doi":"10.21991/c9dq0x","title":"THE POSSIBILITIES OF SCHACHTER: A RESPONSE TO PROFESSOR DUCLOS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Traditional medicine; Medicine","score_opus":0.060671339562231634,"score_gpt":0.25846708955799613,"score_spread":0.1977957499957645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W175016376","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3893945,0.0024691236,0.00976468,0.066816494,0.014968901,0.0038205646,0.0022572472,0.00073251873,0.509776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884605,0.000038904178,0.0007185181,0.001408576,0.00021743723,0.00014598007,0.000021201608,0.000015932143,0.008972953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99737585,0.00018325484,0.0008012952,0.00042786612,0.0005022541,0.0007094859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976226,0.0004745964,0.0002339861,0.0006196389,0.000849285,0.00019988896],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009893839,0.00032618485,0.00034323076,0.00018559667,0.0027651845,0.0001537906,0.0005846848,0.00013124016,0.000574434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009259432,0.00024308226,0.00026590587,0.00010018966,0.016420534,0.0005005146,0.00022929524,0.0003528652,0.00056577096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008682835,0.00016916635,0.0010686574,0.000026997832,0.000075275195,0.0000073683527,0.009693438,0.000006508099,0.0002313282,0.9804375,0.0070176646,0.00039777523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011096317,0.00044975526,0.00022588644,0.0003393442,0.00006184904,0.000071928094,0.042163152,0.00004466015,0.002531097,0.20107034,0.7513176,0.00061476283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014180507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012663472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7793672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098473036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001234906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99853307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1781936603","doi":"10.21991/c9ft1n","title":"A Level Playing Field for Classical Liberalism: the Abolition of the Court Challenges Program Empowers a Diversity of Perspectives on Freedom and Equality","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Democracy; Supreme court; Parliament; Law; Sovereignty; Liberalism; Politics; Diversity (politics); Public administration","score_opus":0.12312341857132394,"score_gpt":0.31864253031266854,"score_spread":0.1955191117413446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1781936603","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23955387,0.009557647,0.0324643,0.19307053,0.006430789,0.008929077,0.003054339,0.00043105916,0.5065084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983524,0.00037363783,0.0006613597,0.00034622254,0.0001270131,0.00009272568,0.0000056350686,0.0000035003525,0.00003749392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981953,0.00014772866,0.00037054392,0.00033587223,0.0005531903,0.00039740358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983556,0.00056860544,0.000264948,0.00021228124,0.0005032465,0.00009526373],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006356125,0.00019441309,0.00030271575,0.00007332148,0.004010879,0.000023875436,0.0004129423,0.00016752265,0.000038655322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00091932254,0.00013257081,0.0002699866,0.0002055525,0.016477833,0.00025987142,0.00034708853,0.00020676473,0.0000021221558],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021731913,0.00029419237,0.010874676,0.0000199893,0.00013402433,7.217213e-7,0.007425276,0.000010225945,0.000015144274,0.97892135,0.0007770482,0.0013100242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034477217,0.0008762273,0.073200844,0.00076759927,0.0004604808,0.000036652236,0.21194564,0.00019752346,0.0003290688,0.62159616,0.08623565,0.0009064531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027156633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024701166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75879854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000115587616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007337916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1796699619","doi":"10.21991/c9n666","title":"Pedagogies of Mapping","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Downtown; Task (project management); Class (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Process (computing); Work (physics); Sociology; Visual arts; Mathematics education; Psychology; Aesthetics; Computer science; Management; History; Engineering; Art; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04839671608608985,"score_gpt":0.3153386166776551,"score_spread":0.26694190059156525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1796699619","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018565744,0.008545559,0.041965056,0.010887235,0.006535204,0.00074978615,0.00023551025,0.00040993182,0.912106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994591,0.0003302769,0.002188691,0.0006743254,0.0004817051,0.000036151738,0.00003967403,0.0000055070677,0.0016526928],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977656,0.00010279655,0.00042541482,0.00022492543,0.0006219253,0.0008593416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998792,0.00018893517,0.00019491067,0.0002189655,0.00033367064,0.00027150603],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006989531,0.0001988296,0.00027159404,0.00004287708,0.0020740388,0.000049043545,0.00034741402,0.0002199054,0.000690538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063972035,0.00018884242,0.00029043455,0.000454802,0.010321886,0.0011218126,0.00011573998,0.00023345422,0.0001833119],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008546563,0.00010476544,0.051353026,0.000017198405,0.00005417501,0.0000012185244,0.0029295834,0.00004292874,0.00024771012,0.9303448,0.014378747,0.0005172916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046731043,0.0000123944,0.001043543,0.00011225777,0.000036653495,0.000029324628,0.053652473,0.00000937271,0.000352049,0.019507425,0.92445314,0.0003240377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022297286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015844007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9760252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019614001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001256333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99922514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1798857825","doi":"10.21991/c9995r","title":"THE CHARTER REVOLUTION: IS IT UNDEMOCRATIC?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Legislature; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.062082940363001854,"score_gpt":0.2909810495467232,"score_spread":0.22889810918372136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1798857825","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005797438,0.0030886028,0.027493363,0.070241615,0.004467567,0.00086563855,0.00015868818,0.00027696474,0.8928278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870468,0.0011254343,0.00054827606,0.0063933763,0.00059581693,0.00018011559,0.000021977587,0.000009671293,0.004078528],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99627584,0.00017865987,0.00072885834,0.0005809493,0.0010071378,0.0012285342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979116,0.00032460756,0.00024280192,0.00043651287,0.00072169234,0.00036281405],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088279275,0.0003800138,0.00034285878,0.00013547286,0.013295325,0.00018843047,0.0007566315,0.00025561263,0.0016563154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006926485,0.00030233327,0.00034682345,0.0006368866,0.024551116,0.0008465523,0.00023186898,0.0003748105,0.0017990705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055094795,0.00008595133,0.008063775,0.0000031901718,0.00012535868,0.000015167483,0.0010938419,0.0000039228057,0.000008712517,0.8917828,0.09771571,0.001046443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045734958,0.000037348265,0.00090598286,0.00007389601,0.000061875,0.00004838253,0.011714906,0.000028423725,0.00004606872,0.24790552,0.7383287,0.0003915695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022433256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049126185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98646706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043286962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003036398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W182551936","doi":"10.21991/c9rs94","title":"TOWARDS THE REFERENDUM: CAMPAIGN CONTRADICTIONS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Colonialism, slavery, and trade","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.08461841856248449,"score_gpt":0.2889212261118389,"score_spread":0.20430280754935443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W182551936","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010915965,0.001194239,0.041873734,0.019623615,0.0073831305,0.0013510868,0.0004649702,0.0006695935,0.9165237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99563307,0.0002299903,0.0005205192,0.0018737206,0.0005110872,0.00017671855,0.000053188083,0.00001193018,0.0009897766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99690247,0.00025306168,0.0005504785,0.0005065692,0.00074365997,0.0010437452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835813,0.00022006866,0.000187961,0.000479973,0.00036562953,0.00038825287],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077762257,0.00033308615,0.0003237993,0.0001956505,0.005842749,0.00016660671,0.0007448579,0.0002942204,0.0013745375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053050305,0.00027020127,0.0003304993,0.00062460755,0.013325354,0.000720148,0.00011881994,0.0004624362,0.00044771563],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054889762,0.00015298069,0.006933581,0.0000038606913,0.000113288486,0.000025614212,0.0040662093,0.000020416433,0.000016694425,0.9788331,0.0085063,0.0012730624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010780345,0.00006707228,0.005039579,0.00005776942,0.00015205264,0.00013356764,0.0111289555,0.0000417159,0.00017238143,0.08770343,0.8939124,0.00051309506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042964015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072396165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98471713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003929902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003985562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1827439841","doi":"10.21991/c9w66c","title":"Notes from an Insider: Some Bold Ideas on Senate Reform","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Courage; Suspect; Witness; Insider; Political science; Law; Boldness; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Personality","score_opus":0.042586314329761364,"score_gpt":0.3071328447252197,"score_spread":0.26454653039545833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1827439841","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22981943,0.004585032,0.007603807,0.32532364,0.011600992,0.0020918252,0.010448868,0.0012162472,0.40731016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9777301,0.00010525194,0.00030572046,0.019870406,0.0010425625,0.000046587895,0.00019095167,0.000014038885,0.0006943737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99670273,0.00014325655,0.0004976497,0.0006338582,0.0009905007,0.0010319761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976162,0.00018352237,0.00022712648,0.00050158874,0.00033956542,0.0011320395],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055831193,0.00034843836,0.00035821035,0.00022742474,0.0019650334,0.00022887503,0.00053619524,0.00032903382,0.00017055709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014456083,0.00035346556,0.00018395188,0.00039133636,0.006341724,0.0019528319,0.00010523868,0.00037534293,0.0008160559],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088541055,0.000106815285,0.0018852396,0.0000028556196,0.000041401905,0.00005388813,0.00052400504,0.00031507012,0.000047218382,0.9723569,0.02375328,0.0008247933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013701202,0.00008922732,0.00063479703,0.00015678452,0.00003163804,0.000031169384,0.0023490181,0.00013528201,0.00041069178,0.28338492,0.7108225,0.0005837864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11732624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09424604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7479107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015995755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057504913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999619},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W183165674","doi":"10.21991/c9ch42","title":"REFORMING THE AMENDING FORMULA: THE CASE FOR A CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.054989791133774196,"score_gpt":0.3082515803233684,"score_spread":0.2532617891895942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W183165674","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011537285,0.00053792907,0.59894097,0.021148711,0.0067093135,0.003376281,0.00071754854,0.00034212918,0.35668987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948529,0.000047173122,0.001156649,0.0015573712,0.0005788844,0.0005091533,0.00014379155,0.000009762681,0.0011443261],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997259,0.00016642736,0.0006811936,0.00044577167,0.000612187,0.00083539984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99773324,0.000598283,0.00037292836,0.00032451208,0.00079753035,0.00017348873],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016881096,0.0002997269,0.00023583177,0.00016362453,0.009985254,0.0002037073,0.00060315593,0.00021097578,0.00044439718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009172899,0.00020392772,0.00039530278,0.00037474907,0.014625077,0.0012052887,0.0001278006,0.000321633,0.00012909023],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008532443,0.00008233202,0.0014628887,0.000010168222,0.00010944053,0.000059624363,0.0008538464,0.00008216319,0.00003674645,0.99341863,0.0025617888,0.0012370701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015050102,0.00007369151,0.00015535383,0.0001245658,0.00016578114,0.0020336849,0.018888865,0.0012058575,0.00040805276,0.2382923,0.7366262,0.0005206278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017554837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003926616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9833156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005675543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019316865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9913036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1838317706","doi":"10.21991/c97h4t","title":"A FRAMEWORK FOR CONFLICT MANAGEMENT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conflict management; Process management; Political science; Business; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.08149919982096655,"score_gpt":0.32364920414586373,"score_spread":0.2421500043248972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1838317706","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00043809324,0.00026488747,0.55881,0.0032180853,0.001992015,0.001471533,0.000070451446,0.00030786733,0.43342707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9635121,0.0002708745,0.030331098,0.0020465401,0.00030387714,0.0005026445,0.00009281578,0.000014210526,0.0029258004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975443,0.00006840844,0.00047418562,0.00052089634,0.0005205305,0.00087167975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986854,0.00021597413,0.00019644422,0.0003438859,0.00030399382,0.00025426803],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061718526,0.00027598688,0.00026256393,0.0003194536,0.0024704488,0.00012596564,0.0004940174,0.00023435,0.0011783149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037491546,0.00030003497,0.0002731518,0.00046350027,0.0037197322,0.00068850117,0.00013797902,0.00017050254,0.00034213727],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100798316,0.00012955542,0.004317342,0.000025712747,0.00014078993,0.000010596682,0.0010650773,0.00001204682,0.000005876621,0.98353124,0.00626599,0.0043949992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086664857,0.000043173477,0.0006258429,0.0000982719,0.000103207625,0.000005425202,0.005409209,0.000087438515,0.00006378988,0.2552277,0.7370922,0.00037709257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023083694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003547183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.963074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023638389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005499328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W184083580","doi":"10.21991/c91089","title":"FARCE OR TRAGEDY?: JUDICIAL BACKLASH AND JUSTICE MCCLUNG","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Backlash; Economic Justice; Tragedy (event); Law; Political science; Sociology; Engineering; Mechanical engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.06409486659759038,"score_gpt":0.2975601136211885,"score_spread":0.2334652470235981,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W184083580","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014818461,0.0028356693,0.045089442,0.007714862,0.0053759078,0.0012749812,0.00035000563,0.0006182961,0.9219224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932841,0.00087954465,0.0018776593,0.0022304857,0.0007103065,0.000105862084,0.000032134587,0.00001329379,0.00086663367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963384,0.00017413068,0.0006880073,0.00074816943,0.0008559997,0.001195279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812317,0.00035347973,0.0002255711,0.00026189935,0.00050189206,0.00053397723],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069850567,0.0004546376,0.00051145273,0.00026650206,0.0067562456,0.00014067096,0.0004776492,0.00032714763,0.0013671106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013036011,0.00041296508,0.00021144637,0.0006842976,0.020867154,0.0010523781,0.00028684823,0.00042251815,0.00038901746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024072113,0.0001662735,0.00986363,0.000019165745,0.00012840517,0.00009344669,0.001178831,0.000014421601,0.000040408948,0.9820551,0.0038337086,0.0023658634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027906774,0.00023953064,0.007047903,0.0003605767,0.00065887143,0.00044800274,0.026106363,0.00010333331,0.00016091457,0.22424097,0.7362116,0.0016312244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044115754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008474964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9784656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002904151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032863426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1844738237","doi":"10.21991/c9595h","title":"La signification de l’article 23 de la Charte et son étendue aujourd’hui dans les communautés minoritaires francophones : vers une transculturalité réelle","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.0824361971768889,"score_gpt":0.3441542191555777,"score_spread":0.2617180219786888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1844738237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6379559,0.0056100762,0.13392147,0.07532781,0.0049839565,0.0018130426,0.0015015958,0.00065598905,0.13823014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902362,0.0007728496,0.0022738874,0.0021307073,0.00030797144,0.00013917533,0.00026174504,0.000029844397,0.0038475757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99408257,0.0020192366,0.00095747074,0.00069263496,0.0007141276,0.0015339884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971332,0.00083224935,0.0003668913,0.00047948008,0.00054951303,0.00063865684],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018744762,0.00063952047,0.00051539665,0.00017706506,0.0036385548,0.00026846456,0.0006984714,0.00091844023,0.00066807953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006239795,0.00064826076,0.0004933635,0.0006083035,0.021993928,0.00159935,0.0000976278,0.00093883934,0.00039709223],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007144956,0.00053479907,0.044493217,0.000078525096,0.00020738137,0.000044045508,0.09065421,0.0012216298,0.0036027252,0.8529995,0.004641719,0.0014507709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039200685,0.00014813167,0.09463168,0.00070161547,0.00059970457,0.0008244967,0.2933047,0.003097874,0.007126483,0.033554252,0.56022704,0.0018639805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04737629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022646312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81944525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002416879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005646304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1861047295","doi":"10.21991/c9d67d","title":"Placing Future Senate Reform in Context","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Orthodoxy; Sociology; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.02798097432640635,"score_gpt":0.285291566097376,"score_spread":0.25731059177096965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1861047295","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057383988,0.003682506,0.00840131,0.045208644,0.00825498,0.0011110554,0.00035641124,0.00036632986,0.8752348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99573666,0.000056266013,0.00018474266,0.0018309761,0.00074899185,0.000057308793,0.000028685525,0.000007717945,0.0013486524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969446,0.00013709848,0.00057813287,0.0004349803,0.0008073292,0.001097824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854445,0.00008137359,0.00016854546,0.00025173218,0.00033410868,0.00061978854],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009696981,0.00025762382,0.00036453645,0.00016499106,0.0009732498,0.00012455675,0.0003661032,0.00029920455,0.000080358244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007152123,0.00024164302,0.00014250564,0.00050247065,0.0043940623,0.0009972602,0.00011260482,0.00035351934,0.0003999038],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004359133,0.000062823274,0.01245728,0.000009041369,0.000016409316,0.00004987079,0.0005978056,0.000071051945,0.000015823513,0.9820091,0.003844335,0.0008228505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016908844,0.000027047621,0.0006261844,0.00023154615,0.00001080533,0.000080540834,0.023696963,0.000115391565,0.00007125642,0.032594953,0.9404255,0.00042888647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017245559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03320769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9494142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002223374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003416474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W186839639","doi":"10.21991/c96t03","title":"INDETERMINATE CUSTODY AFTER SWAIN","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Public Procurement and Policy","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indeterminate; Psychology; Criminology; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.027964629203116778,"score_gpt":0.22202437775442077,"score_spread":0.19405974855130398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W186839639","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0360737,0.00055160024,0.025363931,0.0044781263,0.003917532,0.0009695179,0.000115895135,0.0007855419,0.92774415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98862076,0.000009904453,0.0005157182,0.008821001,0.00089935615,0.0002196676,0.00012058231,0.000020439586,0.00077259785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973313,0.00001474474,0.00060119637,0.0005710046,0.00048841373,0.0009932952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879426,0.000030334299,0.00027759504,0.00043833852,0.00037738634,0.00008208148],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037504104,0.00045502395,0.00033878008,0.00068621314,0.00083356537,0.00028370856,0.00056680106,0.00022678146,0.002824211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024496284,0.0004315401,0.00025951132,0.0006629338,0.0027140067,0.0035056144,0.00044377614,0.000316864,0.0035327144],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011784547,0.0001503053,0.0703123,0.000042901043,0.000054065677,0.00006324676,0.000026694754,0.000007146616,0.00005476591,0.9151938,0.0123943165,0.0015826428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019639377,0.00002658671,0.010471775,0.00015585576,0.00013553686,0.0001303014,0.0003609104,0.0007044648,0.00019999269,0.117478155,0.867315,0.0010574809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003341383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017660658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.952547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012355421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048147255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1868689271","doi":"10.21991/c9737t","title":"Canada, the United Nations Human Rights Council, and Universal Periodic Review","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Mandate; International human rights law; Commission; Fundamental rights; Law; Promotion (chess); Transparency (behavior); Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.07843411927388214,"score_gpt":0.28236564935882386,"score_spread":0.20393153008494172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1868689271","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005555386,0.008993148,0.0023644117,0.060769606,0.001565688,0.0013185411,0.00035373107,0.00018705158,0.91889244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99407226,0.0010798208,0.00013366563,0.0030283525,0.000086701046,0.00003917985,0.000042366715,0.000004161004,0.0015135219],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778104,0.00014475513,0.00035030895,0.0003267256,0.0008708506,0.0005263116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830765,0.00025270946,0.0001379526,0.00026204155,0.0007780545,0.00026157039],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007098048,0.00020760238,0.00021790796,0.00020171683,0.008864365,0.00007785901,0.00042687464,0.000097761695,0.0007741051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006605403,0.0001651081,0.00008737283,0.0010544562,0.009815943,0.00052352296,0.000104180996,0.00023667855,0.00004349124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007995215,0.00002607,0.0010449197,0.000031484273,0.000027421102,0.000024433197,0.00032027691,0.000004775171,0.000004553551,0.9285309,0.06994036,0.000036821802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002081105,0.00001916923,0.0004631679,0.00056846987,0.00010390131,0.00007769161,0.00208052,0.000012948586,0.000008538837,0.009764654,0.9864443,0.0002485349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8047987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9531894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98851687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007439114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00898781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1869387443","doi":"10.21991/c9xt10","title":"Faith in Rights: the Struggle Over Same- Sex Adoption in the United Kingdom","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Faith; Sexual orientation; Emancipation; Kingdom; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Sociology; Public administration; Gender studies; Politics; Theology","score_opus":0.09428515149038699,"score_gpt":0.3258573819259709,"score_spread":0.23157223043558392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1869387443","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26912883,0.00010400859,0.012329968,0.015347134,0.0017392875,0.0016088801,0.00014477274,0.00018234065,0.6994148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99621975,0.00001505371,0.00020070074,0.002956006,0.00010144581,0.00011136095,0.00008319159,0.0000049731498,0.00030750028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99711704,0.0005346065,0.0005530745,0.00035856647,0.00073644496,0.0007002871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891406,0.000318841,0.00015894101,0.00034061456,0.00015815531,0.00010940594],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016957801,0.0002294675,0.0002126214,0.0003619692,0.0019047317,0.00016655852,0.000709118,0.00019986519,0.00064166746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003617294,0.00015467558,0.00013136264,0.0012072778,0.0070544938,0.0008193015,0.00008983231,0.0004127726,0.0001252968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004279302,0.00019718449,0.032258682,0.00000460935,0.000013744704,0.000014105004,0.0062208637,0.000113057074,0.0000041219814,0.9592428,0.0016955036,0.00019248741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018265122,0.000058454116,0.029857298,0.00016318272,0.00004005087,0.000031920186,0.039939553,0.000364164,0.000030060883,0.32689327,0.6002595,0.00053607987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023584044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042548034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72709095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032177384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081266824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99939466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1881710185","doi":"10.21991/c92378","title":"FROM MARGINALIZED DISCOURSES TO TENDER EMBRACES: BUILDING A NEW FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION JURISPRUDENCE IN SOUTH AFRICA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Freedom of expression; Expression (computer science); Law; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; Human rights; Computer science","score_opus":0.05095967262843192,"score_gpt":0.31197599485480704,"score_spread":0.2610163222263751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1881710185","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06924502,0.006120086,0.5006549,0.004739714,0.0060284412,0.0029110054,0.0011748106,0.0005723705,0.4085537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9529265,0.000018230747,0.045679435,0.00016963182,0.0002996616,0.000080778875,0.000020453755,0.000014854116,0.0007904353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960641,0.00020874948,0.0008493483,0.0007791277,0.0010443305,0.0010543062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978759,0.0003411055,0.0003445874,0.0005331282,0.00029232685,0.0006129109],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058525323,0.00038643202,0.0005940094,0.00048059886,0.00086809724,0.00010097039,0.0010405829,0.0003102843,0.0012881331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017290834,0.00037258188,0.00023300131,0.0010427056,0.0057507996,0.0011287495,0.00040049542,0.0003491196,0.00017922957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023287021,0.00017798714,0.02285759,0.000010662469,0.000040635463,0.000037179954,0.06099787,0.000349895,0.0012616507,0.9115183,0.0023316897,0.00018368418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006273893,0.00025084618,0.0030477752,0.002942557,0.00025224572,0.000017629536,0.14036797,0.0002859987,0.009134842,0.19455135,0.6403359,0.0025389614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005031454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010201174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8836815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003346813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029333583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1889813613","doi":"10.21991/c9vm19","title":"AFTER 30 OCTOBER 1995","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science","score_opus":0.03229808555469514,"score_gpt":0.2718328098626446,"score_spread":0.23953472430794942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1889813613","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0070063006,0.0017204522,0.028710144,0.006289012,0.0037512337,0.0007663733,0.00022949967,0.00038872144,0.95113826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939232,0.000117912095,0.0013037496,0.0013711157,0.0003844122,0.0001554708,0.00003261752,0.000010115768,0.0027014166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974696,0.000096620264,0.00045908414,0.00047245296,0.00059251575,0.0009097356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870515,0.000090758986,0.00012616003,0.0003205711,0.00040639882,0.00035097008],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036388842,0.00028413555,0.00027784987,0.0001805509,0.0034126227,0.000091625625,0.00030629025,0.00023702854,0.006076012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027876915,0.00026155874,0.00028197985,0.00044715914,0.011563822,0.0007878467,0.0001739764,0.0002470415,0.0013087546],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042779495,0.00011663577,0.024899362,0.0000059966383,0.000073084084,0.00005814159,0.0011362081,0.00001685298,0.0000074949016,0.96379095,0.009254942,0.00059753173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007200429,0.00003862982,0.005371104,0.00006028784,0.00007820792,0.00006219378,0.005794894,0.000030296054,0.00004396757,0.046259884,0.9410135,0.0005269833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013843237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022494502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9869169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027804778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015304189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W189483094","doi":"10.21991/c9466j","title":"REFORMING OUR POLITICAL DISCOURSE: THE NATIONAL INTEREST IN A TRANSNATIONAL WORLD","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; National interest; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.09164859159163281,"score_gpt":0.3448534780588983,"score_spread":0.2532048864672655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W189483094","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037931714,0.00021761455,0.01350728,0.1702837,0.0026637067,0.0011185668,0.0005693462,0.00023128219,0.7734768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958755,0.000010579329,0.00045373876,0.0027082928,0.00023025562,0.00007530849,0.00007820123,0.0000071200884,0.00056101754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997082,0.00015863663,0.0005642849,0.00039956646,0.0007654557,0.0010300676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988966,0.00014388158,0.00011542583,0.00016116558,0.00040064336,0.00028227374],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096838915,0.00024990426,0.00023421226,0.00036894242,0.001627686,0.000102543774,0.000607753,0.00017827364,0.00023598153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005330775,0.00020828907,0.00020850675,0.0007445651,0.0053783525,0.0009446566,0.00010635704,0.0004852508,0.00009783952],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004187144,0.00018892027,0.017782139,0.000004863957,0.000030447074,0.000016602267,0.00079211494,0.000051920793,0.000008233477,0.9794841,0.0014407221,0.00015810605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015857046,0.000042789277,0.005564321,0.00014383013,0.000046169815,0.00013010681,0.060526974,0.001050809,0.00003427721,0.7632332,0.16692092,0.00072089245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011599262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05834843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9579438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008760542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027215106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1896722836","doi":"10.21991/c9hq17","title":"Section 273.65 of the National Defence Act: Inappropriate and Unconstitutional","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Military and Defense Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Charter; National security; Parliament; Political science; State (computer science); Terrorism; Mandate; Legislature; Power (physics); Doctrine; Section (typography); Business; Politics","score_opus":0.04644164917256473,"score_gpt":0.2711364385738526,"score_spread":0.2246947894012879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1896722836","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08570108,0.0017427506,0.017755734,0.004921384,0.0053732167,0.001296431,0.00051423634,0.00023581753,0.88245934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973397,0.00017160147,0.0011271024,0.00062709616,0.0002340278,0.000058974794,0.00001321051,0.000005320477,0.00042295145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99732906,0.00018578835,0.00055356405,0.0004575132,0.00093543576,0.0005386454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983644,0.00021976816,0.00025255088,0.00020050857,0.0007853251,0.00017743256],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008614442,0.00026447538,0.00028300696,0.00017982868,0.0034848012,0.000036266032,0.0003715055,0.00021928818,0.00033120104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013086055,0.00021678113,0.00021385733,0.00056181854,0.019962315,0.00080167904,0.00025491856,0.000305457,0.00003840422],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006624668,0.00009974352,0.0759523,0.000016932987,0.00007583718,0.0000023487235,0.0009760673,0.00007920798,0.00012407222,0.9207611,0.0016322655,0.00021389553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002898106,0.00016687777,0.08871861,0.0005064344,0.0002382397,0.00045020308,0.014553343,0.00024433632,0.0010795203,0.5595746,0.33022606,0.0013436646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010941479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002009784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9116386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023167991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W189890627","doi":"10.21991/c9nq2v","title":"GUN CONTROL AND JUDICIAL ANARCHY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gun control; Control (management); Political science; Law; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.03405555251579101,"score_gpt":0.2670749701080727,"score_spread":0.23301941759228167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W189890627","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011009276,0.003851433,0.057981003,0.012206421,0.0033454874,0.0012292302,0.0004131154,0.00053639174,0.90942764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99529976,0.00042913028,0.0008962108,0.0025509098,0.0004687544,0.000108730426,0.000027417691,0.000009326222,0.0002097883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968776,0.00016331054,0.00056875707,0.00061308814,0.0007310646,0.0010461595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984198,0.00021910509,0.00018016607,0.00022906912,0.00047585202,0.00047598363],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006414157,0.0003659385,0.00045471484,0.00026333446,0.0050165593,0.00009998492,0.0003846842,0.0002631352,0.00070856087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007281982,0.00036567892,0.00021043855,0.0004840914,0.024164548,0.00081122614,0.0001748999,0.0003179541,0.0003084775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011891688,0.00012318479,0.05156982,0.0000048436455,0.00012888771,0.000044913402,0.0006347517,0.000007618211,0.000035666675,0.9421395,0.0032475663,0.0019443153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026964936,0.00013609747,0.012073634,0.00014201377,0.00019359076,0.00015007911,0.009368284,0.000062737054,0.000052002364,0.46161878,0.512534,0.0009722957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005400078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004570568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9842905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022806108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021048188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1899914807","doi":"10.21991/c9rw95","title":"Some Pedagogical Reflections","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Reflective Practices in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Unit (ring theory); Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Psychology; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.13527100578387724,"score_gpt":0.44938026772539563,"score_spread":0.3141092619415184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1899914807","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010321098,0.0037902326,0.057916045,0.02474722,0.015035635,0.0009474074,0.00007517981,0.0006125113,0.88655466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865663,0.00035171382,0.0051424983,0.0019040337,0.0029443863,0.00019112135,0.000061099185,0.000012784838,0.0028260655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965128,0.00037196756,0.000503044,0.00044388953,0.0008385373,0.0013297728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978273,0.0005006026,0.00024480926,0.0003617086,0.0004461533,0.00061942224],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012746433,0.00029016353,0.00026630785,0.00032275938,0.004753682,0.00018727512,0.0004142804,0.0003212054,0.0010709554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026641593,0.00030003488,0.00022310423,0.00073083927,0.007901414,0.0044208164,0.00013018596,0.0005143929,0.0015736555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002805531,0.00035964302,0.04249822,0.0000048134248,0.0000523594,0.0000026521866,0.0013771895,0.00006455367,0.00024535652,0.9480432,0.005958629,0.0013652961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003819318,0.00002718935,0.0014424807,0.000029337587,0.000060270042,0.00012755214,0.011999402,0.000012812765,0.00016954076,0.07566265,0.90968716,0.00039969254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038231426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003631527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9762452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010330816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028642346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1903345289","doi":"10.21991/c9tt12","title":"Abdelrazik: Tort Liability for Exercise of Prerogative Powers?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Tort; Liability; Strict liability; Law and economics; Law; Business; Political science; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.05324074836314739,"score_gpt":0.3134082847570873,"score_spread":0.2601675363939399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1903345289","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0179296,0.0006727431,0.30534965,0.0051738126,0.0022051837,0.0044919634,0.0019044991,0.00037084482,0.6619017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906329,0.00006980187,0.007740161,0.00025492557,0.00011189993,0.00040117145,0.000068362264,0.000008288595,0.0007125098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978018,0.00005557759,0.0006088529,0.00047412256,0.00042897722,0.0006306713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99778736,0.00021426882,0.00027917014,0.00039245497,0.001052973,0.00027377412],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006644878,0.00022928452,0.00034816607,0.00012414911,0.0016809165,0.000039322695,0.0004915873,0.00021448979,0.0005194473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007610176,0.00022998155,0.0003190384,0.00036982397,0.009008286,0.00068434695,0.00012362443,0.00015157534,0.000073220435],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009979848,0.0002749516,0.0075729736,0.000025262985,0.000045415873,0.0000010445325,0.0012636292,0.000036422036,0.00008473385,0.9874304,0.0023134998,0.0008518724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018687192,0.00015064707,0.0022958382,0.00024080841,0.00019187908,0.000011348919,0.016089112,0.00023245867,0.0033645146,0.24779741,0.72699773,0.0007595361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010628599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00076982635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9727033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002264618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022834176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1904988749","doi":"10.21991/c9g38c","title":"A Principled Approach to the Positive/Negative Rights Debate in Canadian Constitutional Adjudication","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; State (computer science); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Algorithm","score_opus":0.01772730111569473,"score_gpt":0.2619739155655011,"score_spread":0.24424661444980636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1904988749","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005820327,0.00051183015,0.079818994,0.042746264,0.0021925443,0.002469287,0.0006794841,0.00020978,0.8655515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920315,0.000051907762,0.0010509826,0.005394612,0.00046055292,0.00051172136,0.00023567703,0.000008431345,0.00025461527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951033,0.00045480495,0.00079211703,0.0008773697,0.0011014902,0.0016709045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971031,0.00061853806,0.00020585192,0.0003974886,0.0007693952,0.0009056035],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001767371,0.0004674058,0.00053198164,0.00077318784,0.007590228,0.00021677685,0.00084340025,0.00030313653,0.00016209146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023790516,0.00039465717,0.00023704181,0.0019760146,0.018389171,0.00070225593,0.0001968546,0.00050417247,0.0006425739],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056870118,0.00015387005,0.013080008,0.0000035512664,0.00010637256,0.000010355306,0.0008186255,0.0039452217,0.000012085046,0.9780255,0.0031286967,0.0006588592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001277784,0.00005156168,0.015260208,0.00020631705,0.00009664867,0.00007314516,0.002494044,0.0019281486,0.000031142652,0.11839492,0.85934895,0.000837136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2620564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6574359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9862112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018948526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007512432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W190611284","doi":"10.21991/c9337k","title":"THE THREE FAILURES IN MODERN CANADIAN FEDERALISM: WHY IS IT IMPOSSIBLE TO FIND A NEW QUEBEC-CANADA PARTNERSHIP?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Federalism; Political science; Public administration; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04066462346384207,"score_gpt":0.24879531748800648,"score_spread":0.2081306940241644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W190611284","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062186886,0.0023719568,0.006901934,0.37149212,0.0040914672,0.0017718879,0.00054200686,0.00011545678,0.6064945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9571021,0.000068939335,0.00021163649,0.017486008,0.00022224252,0.000088456625,0.00002861568,0.0000122466345,0.024779717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996824,0.00008812138,0.00050456665,0.0005123937,0.00067945564,0.0013914597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977443,0.00013196182,0.00011213124,0.00039937336,0.00022680378,0.0013853791],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045592675,0.00026551585,0.00026971503,0.00059752044,0.0068800463,0.0007734401,0.0007770043,0.00023071967,0.0016044002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004536115,0.00028895814,0.00014942231,0.00071378995,0.004804384,0.0006934482,0.000086257685,0.00034530577,0.00023443182],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020922307,0.000011462367,0.0035891922,0.00000253597,0.000021566324,0.00003918642,0.0017596298,0.00005522813,0.0000028968295,0.5914031,0.40207264,0.001021645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004132011,0.000011959808,0.0017868268,0.00006910414,0.000018065446,0.000014920834,0.0068684528,0.00005768373,0.000007438618,0.0282677,0.96208686,0.0003977928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99985033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95088345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004810733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08031021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W190923230","doi":"10.21991/c9zh3z","title":"CONTENT OVERVIEW RETHINKING SOCIAL DEMOCRACY: THE PQ'S PROJECT DE SOCIÉTÉ","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Sociology; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.20021853270809686,"score_gpt":0.3545348189878995,"score_spread":0.15431628627980265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W190923230","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0345931,0.0048441854,0.03887525,0.10211087,0.00685117,0.0027539672,0.000346517,0.0007514529,0.8088735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917707,0.00041984356,0.0009299683,0.004515776,0.0006238659,0.000115659124,0.000012605666,0.000009832946,0.0016017435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99638486,0.0003331819,0.0005193578,0.00049866,0.0010240322,0.0012399168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99852204,0.00027167102,0.0003754705,0.00024765436,0.00038162674,0.00020153717],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017372908,0.0002937611,0.00032913694,0.000081494836,0.008978631,0.00021764179,0.0009693111,0.000302803,0.00056710956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009569797,0.00023355384,0.00039123045,0.0007409141,0.013405798,0.0009126479,0.0002081861,0.00045285842,0.00012124259],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003154361,0.00007501157,0.019299213,0.0000076252168,0.000049451042,0.000014119826,0.00871072,0.000004071149,0.00002404617,0.9512985,0.017854901,0.0026307965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095707504,0.00004589939,0.011720879,0.0001430812,0.00010750077,0.000065129774,0.06396007,0.00009409512,0.00008163198,0.36399868,0.5581368,0.000689116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015906226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011776022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9571776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006939483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063039027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99932945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1910479759","doi":"10.21991/c9dt1b","title":"The Constitution Act, 1982 and the Crown: Twenty-Five Years Later","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Parliament; Law; Majesty; Monarchy; House of Commons; Ceremony; Constitutional monarchy; Proclamation; Political science; Politics; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.03214132816584803,"score_gpt":0.27964751520431286,"score_spread":0.24750618703846483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1910479759","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028764395,0.003355415,0.009344909,0.060812417,0.00833704,0.003215424,0.0005169,0.00045200923,0.8852015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99435705,0.00065475557,0.0002221002,0.0020028616,0.00028052006,0.000105747706,0.000028974471,0.000008198186,0.0023397957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99697155,0.00032997102,0.00059030775,0.00044202755,0.00059185625,0.0010743098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980945,0.00056732097,0.00024344675,0.00043817124,0.0003013938,0.0003551736],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001393881,0.00030227317,0.00031665774,0.000111946545,0.0075912415,0.00042506203,0.00061541615,0.00024057792,0.0002444015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058302697,0.00020667116,0.00023334936,0.00028080438,0.03850392,0.00059729494,0.00022857042,0.0004659683,0.00018795344],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016996106,0.00004292659,0.004514394,0.000005228339,0.00008025759,0.000018513418,0.0018093142,0.000010995604,0.0000033432677,0.9855017,0.006778277,0.001065055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022432758,0.000031490865,0.0031513644,0.00006338209,0.00009142007,0.00013511998,0.006972291,0.000102773425,0.000031035797,0.20810704,0.7786667,0.00040414731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054687364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056802486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9655926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021708329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018778683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99370074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1910526874","doi":"10.21991/c9h38p","title":"'Old Habits Die Hard' - Reflections on the Scope of the Royal Prerogative Following Turp v Canada (Minister of Justice)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Scope (computer science); Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Government (linguistics); Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.030109034237016538,"score_gpt":0.2841475477408719,"score_spread":0.25403851350385537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1910526874","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15585718,0.0005502979,0.00067611074,0.035413075,0.0040549366,0.0018640576,0.0005732602,0.000048938477,0.80096215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931747,0.000025117022,0.00013518483,0.0026417715,0.00012276648,0.00009738533,0.000012976253,0.000006619353,0.003783499],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977984,0.00020084562,0.0004633655,0.00027377965,0.00075854704,0.00050509616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855584,0.000524947,0.0002652111,0.0003675806,0.00014260499,0.0001438323],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028159545,0.0002138823,0.00024863228,0.000052416453,0.0027117548,0.00004744413,0.00052395527,0.0001236708,0.0005103983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00064704247,0.00014209666,0.00026282936,0.00026313117,0.0069894413,0.00027470695,0.00015464926,0.0002651963,0.000057694357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012516551,0.000071002316,0.004742266,0.000012439463,0.00008389669,0.0000015184586,0.00037095498,0.00071901764,0.0002972693,0.9824249,0.011158805,0.00010538824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020679631,0.00023224152,0.02804709,0.0011528501,0.0005852943,0.000018712179,0.024810612,0.00015030449,0.014412785,0.03206887,0.8953678,0.0010854629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16851218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2473845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95035607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004132601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028883172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1911440447","doi":"10.21991/c90m2x","title":"ALBERTA NURSES V. A CONTEMPTUOUS SUPREME COURT OF CANADA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.023581054991758242,"score_gpt":0.2526187480306255,"score_spread":0.22903769303886726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1911440447","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03418756,0.00053476356,0.006846482,0.006933976,0.0055584516,0.001008169,0.00079910894,0.00011991971,0.94401157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99328107,0.000041963704,0.00039975217,0.0013740092,0.00009821259,0.000044364508,0.000048997987,0.000008543635,0.0047031012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997369,0.00009987772,0.0005903248,0.0003695397,0.00073972467,0.0008315279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982395,0.00020020784,0.0002484931,0.00032925527,0.0006149886,0.00036753796],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032012904,0.00025472624,0.0003537538,0.00013608644,0.00173095,0.000036267735,0.0004969528,0.00016033625,0.0017762482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066812895,0.000246747,0.00015440154,0.00038766672,0.0064581274,0.00050913903,0.000097052216,0.00017659862,0.00001557136],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004003324,0.00016299398,0.028058505,0.0000053445756,0.000098720135,0.000016138232,0.00072129356,0.000023640718,0.000058581467,0.9456084,0.024955226,0.00025112054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011705629,0.000060541675,0.0063959607,0.00012133807,0.00007078548,0.000026501537,0.010691045,0.000035240057,0.0006472563,0.017456615,0.96283376,0.00049036776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80032635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9364803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9590935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003936451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010710521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1919822269","doi":"10.21991/c91670","title":"THE CONSTITUTIONAL POLITICS OF LANGUAGE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Historical Linguistics and Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Linguistics; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.031830075463824874,"score_gpt":0.23714122416197933,"score_spread":0.20531114869815445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1919822269","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001542844,0.004919798,0.012599944,0.0009012719,0.0050311503,0.00038680827,0.0009998461,0.000153735,0.9734646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940284,0.0000594963,0.0005282205,0.00044244903,0.0005316357,0.000045118875,0.00006391359,0.000008510593,0.0042922376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997899,0.000046057106,0.0006818872,0.000306168,0.00044791898,0.0006189735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982547,0.00030367236,0.00024487128,0.00036094256,0.00067350216,0.0001623089],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025731258,0.0002878195,0.00032569646,0.00013583277,0.0033829452,0.000074030366,0.00040800238,0.00008550959,0.0013361047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00081800215,0.0002071768,0.00025795112,0.000102831116,0.031592984,0.00018854487,0.00015448508,0.00024590155,0.00018779458],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033575143,0.00012325156,0.00085881515,0.000017961434,0.00013473467,0.000028220664,0.0032125746,0.0000074210816,0.000025388317,0.98655874,0.008591828,0.00040748832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062240695,0.000084257044,0.00008109093,0.00007609681,0.0000928662,0.000063478874,0.015820464,0.00006050542,0.00024586162,0.051658224,0.9308193,0.00037546316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037690016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047134364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9924856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013072533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007594793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1921973096","doi":"10.21991/c9sm1p","title":"\"A CONSTITUTIONAL CONFERENCE ... SHALL BE CONVENED ...\": LIVING WITH CONSTITUTIONAL PROMISES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutional law; Constitutional review; Constitutional economics; Political science; Constitutional interpretation; Law; Constitution","score_opus":0.06731187242642653,"score_gpt":0.28561022802357255,"score_spread":0.21829835559714603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1921973096","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013745634,0.0014976733,0.12960413,0.012467042,0.0036864409,0.0032758662,0.0012074073,0.0013581314,0.83315766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988101,0.00023848744,0.007375946,0.0018554529,0.00040758596,0.00048726017,0.00018849097,0.000017588485,0.0013281998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931605,0.00038571467,0.0011600275,0.0013563602,0.0019290039,0.0020083797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99507487,0.00073621457,0.00058414397,0.00053852296,0.00213209,0.00093417603],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010254253,0.0009452387,0.0009372179,0.00025887872,0.0078071924,0.0003722311,0.0010526055,0.0005756958,0.0048115375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019321836,0.00083103956,0.00043238592,0.00083918165,0.10841673,0.0024276164,0.0004156636,0.0007906648,0.0005194382],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016122119,0.0004346741,0.061256744,0.00003843982,0.0004008981,0.00009511237,0.0022816006,0.00012870194,0.00010400498,0.9315207,0.003279175,0.00029875583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0075261067,0.00056428945,0.013417044,0.002239716,0.00078452344,0.0012682233,0.05956457,0.00035258356,0.0008004485,0.03467578,0.87378114,0.0050255414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018134161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97435534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011153049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007554704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W192742124","doi":"10.21991/c9r363","title":"LEARNING FROM FAILURE: LESSONS FROM CHARLOTTETOWN","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Reflective Practices in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.06493914130182661,"score_gpt":0.34022518528096196,"score_spread":0.27528604397913536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W192742124","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05177664,0.0012019111,0.13747567,0.024210688,0.008129038,0.0010147316,0.00039027244,0.00082625815,0.77497476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841189,0.00020927533,0.012808886,0.00088920695,0.0007624278,0.0001361491,0.00032094034,0.000018403687,0.00073582836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99641335,0.00046102205,0.00057565735,0.00082564214,0.00080557464,0.00091878197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975066,0.00071057654,0.00042662045,0.00043361654,0.0005187335,0.00040383812],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064948975,0.0003662769,0.00036259717,0.00024041305,0.0038176167,0.00023116484,0.0007043277,0.00038549202,0.0050737066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025704938,0.00039884946,0.00022860593,0.0005649867,0.007497783,0.0022224092,0.00019055922,0.00074225944,0.001539383],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005926531,0.00019074461,0.08085536,0.000002007785,0.00013653564,0.000014039301,0.004426259,0.00006673995,0.00047489346,0.9070153,0.0026520735,0.004106768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010014632,0.000059828944,0.008228235,0.00012753002,0.000159242,0.00001713645,0.03515471,0.00012800538,0.001238482,0.21473706,0.7383405,0.00080782664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01439129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059724776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93234223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006637511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031355163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1933445904","doi":"10.21991/c9m08k","title":"A REVIEW OF THE KEEGSTRA CASE: SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS HATE PROPAGANDA LAW","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Precedent","score_opus":0.06449293183224578,"score_gpt":0.32258342611082375,"score_spread":0.258090494278578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1933445904","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[2.449211e-7,0.8487755,0.006418376,0.00096114166,0.004160353,0.0033962356,0.0014968269,0.0001527683,0.13463856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016019245,0.99425256,0.00019345565,0.001328586,0.00047593936,0.00035974765,0.00021700437,0.000035085668,0.0015356838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939086,0.00076456135,0.0020016748,0.0009568203,0.001059883,0.0013084535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99568135,0.00034424334,0.001379886,0.0012120386,0.00092590484,0.00045660514],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018532281,0.0008995285,0.0023495683,0.00020980024,0.0040994985,0.00013928657,0.0016946018,0.0008964836,0.001092404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006626398,0.000610974,0.0019549672,0.0010889369,0.1375517,0.00075834163,0.0004374346,0.0009175922,0.0003051381],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064899755,0.00013564539,0.000018149503,0.01411556,0.0002715903,0.00015135147,0.000105047584,8.200872e-7,1.13229035e-7,0.95081824,0.016333017,0.018043978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003768379,0.00003028185,1.1307005e-7,0.07336212,0.0010627558,0.0030132309,0.00023786975,0.0000011748477,0.0000019895272,0.012995206,0.9081884,0.0007300175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010250605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017575221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93782306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006417047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012448595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W194682418","doi":"10.21991/c9tm10","title":"FROM AN ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN QUEBEC AND CANADA TO A CANADIAN UNION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Politics; Political science; European union; Economic union; Public administration; International trade; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.02590202601161235,"score_gpt":0.2464828640296137,"score_spread":0.22058083801800135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W194682418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48877987,0.0006751469,0.0018605063,0.09290585,0.0031760656,0.0012361677,0.0054752957,0.00018898529,0.4057021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961461,0.000012146972,0.00017639462,0.0024608606,0.00032551773,0.000018962322,0.000111433685,0.000006190399,0.0007423897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817383,0.00010684589,0.00026236338,0.00042867044,0.00020927616,0.00081901706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973342,0.000090312074,0.000048213897,0.00018620133,0.00008929716,0.0022517752],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002681125,0.00016503528,0.00022053512,0.00040193726,0.0026496754,0.00027652067,0.00021128808,0.00017071064,0.00054902054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017178657,0.00022267662,0.000037981703,0.00010244347,0.005915778,0.0005933443,0.000054359476,0.00015782837,0.00006208817],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071886493,0.0000067631663,0.048044417,0.0000024396536,0.000022979873,0.00002231311,0.00072115206,0.000002532844,0.0000012609026,0.93818873,0.0123182405,0.0006619809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003018207,0.000022719143,0.023262218,0.00003312862,0.000042332864,0.000014003592,0.0073434603,0.000009926691,0.000005292765,0.017070811,0.95152974,0.0003645267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99997586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93921155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041622333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03355137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1958936762","doi":"10.21991/c98374","title":"The Constitutionality of Prorogation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Parliament; Prime minister; Context (archaeology); Political science; Meaning (existential); Law; Governor; Constitutional law; Original meaning; Law and economics; Constitution; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy; History; Engineering; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05385636001912841,"score_gpt":0.28924830508521077,"score_spread":0.23539194506608235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1958936762","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006193529,0.0030624827,0.038593188,0.007367187,0.0040311203,0.0013648305,0.00028146434,0.00030873655,0.9387975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99751973,0.0004772128,0.0009345349,0.00037877547,0.0002130987,0.00014563915,0.000028792121,0.0000061992887,0.00029602816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99660814,0.00022733006,0.0008645279,0.00043863803,0.0010269695,0.00083438685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99725085,0.00057193846,0.0004032052,0.00035537133,0.001168609,0.00024999236],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001244912,0.000297754,0.00035445465,0.00014748194,0.00698735,0.00007193218,0.0006532688,0.0002145963,0.00040221738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020688465,0.00023948909,0.00030902022,0.00067383714,0.040750388,0.00071567175,0.0001852147,0.00027568053,0.0001880252],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010811197,0.00015410449,0.03931818,0.0000065999134,0.00012956251,0.000007259498,0.00048538242,0.000021256119,0.000045400207,0.9561124,0.0020963957,0.0015153321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008544857,0.00007812959,0.007340922,0.00018310442,0.000118734686,0.000056105564,0.012147058,0.00003058979,0.00062106166,0.44503874,0.5329576,0.0005734624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032941264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00466245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9913262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029683756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004173255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99430543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W19611839","doi":"10.21991/c98m2d","title":"Theory and Practice in the Government of Alberta’s Consultation Policy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Obligation; Resource (disambiguation); Political science; Law; Subject (documents); Treaty; Process (computing); Subject matter; Natural resource; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.01125353448632626,"score_gpt":0.2981553040719349,"score_spread":0.28690176958560865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W19611839","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0433869,0.0007417999,0.004607667,0.028816197,0.0006802725,0.001869936,0.00004572169,0.000028363267,0.91982317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99456424,0.0018929146,0.00053241156,0.0012019128,0.00015838891,0.000042686832,0.000018166238,0.0000039583133,0.0015853322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729884,0.0007590078,0.0004604193,0.00024763745,0.00073015597,0.00050391763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995048,0.003994669,0.0002516145,0.0001946174,0.00038069673,0.00013041365],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020449585,0.0001535752,0.00017958935,0.0001283285,0.0037657425,0.000085469444,0.00024658325,0.00014674202,0.00015569241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001562417,0.00011383634,0.000056572913,0.00043000598,0.0061907195,0.0009681663,0.000006104465,0.00017476872,0.000053185315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004250755,0.00016474562,0.0016493237,0.000013944304,0.00001772713,0.0000013509183,0.053405087,0.000024579671,0.000008046249,0.94367284,0.00033327861,0.00066660147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074727787,0.000041671374,0.0018533709,0.00008067013,0.00003161182,0.00008736569,0.119831,0.00001923736,0.000031973996,0.122565985,0.75450104,0.00020878823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08512461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1511012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95117736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003421639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016401926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99753124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1962627040","doi":"10.21991/c9hx0x","title":"Complexity and the Amending Formula","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Scapegoat; Rhetoric; Politics; Law and economics; Order (exchange); Political science; Crutch; Public administration; Law; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07189309689036848,"score_gpt":0.3163968659363234,"score_spread":0.2445037690459549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1962627040","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013926226,0.0025671849,0.08424197,0.066927105,0.0031655016,0.001245111,0.00026919687,0.00026645593,0.82739127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99630105,0.0000544496,0.00044283018,0.001785364,0.00030507043,0.00005506668,0.000012680273,0.0000043032155,0.001039194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779123,0.00018573973,0.00036669307,0.0002924601,0.0006471502,0.0007167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986153,0.00033166,0.00014149937,0.00020458596,0.00024671177,0.00046020906],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013016829,0.00018112658,0.00028421247,0.000054551467,0.0024217085,0.00019525645,0.00030191612,0.00012482156,0.000062380306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016010891,0.00013177983,0.000118589654,0.00023148928,0.023684064,0.0005986518,0.00015847415,0.00020458178,0.00012409918],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054873617,0.00002297269,0.005681895,0.000004697318,0.000024936595,0.0000054446605,0.0003892025,0.000025888645,0.0000025530794,0.98750144,0.0059535904,0.00033248044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020161378,0.00001338415,0.0003390711,0.00005127056,0.000020579353,0.00006313239,0.0030604622,0.00035590364,0.000007534627,0.31938,0.6744938,0.00019878465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007314649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026470567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9823748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003294744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014441378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W198008171","doi":"10.21991/c9266x","title":"THE HISTORICAL CONTEXT OF MEECH LAKE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Classical Antiquity Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Geography; Environmental planning; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Archaeology","score_opus":0.05745777018997514,"score_gpt":0.2820085750910423,"score_spread":0.22455080490106719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W198008171","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003934026,0.004030458,0.027242426,0.07860647,0.0076290257,0.0012696437,0.0002892609,0.00040980495,0.8765889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940585,0.0003173648,0.0004579235,0.00055113254,0.00016065019,0.000060078328,0.000009979568,0.000006128055,0.0043782513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973954,0.00015001558,0.0006268697,0.00034671806,0.00073038624,0.0007506211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980029,0.00060749816,0.00025246642,0.00031630413,0.000595909,0.00022493322],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007627956,0.00022570287,0.00035434106,0.00010305668,0.0038713992,0.000047010835,0.000612939,0.00018600246,0.00029843277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019031534,0.00017271496,0.00029432712,0.00043323362,0.017793994,0.00036411535,0.00023060093,0.00026515577,0.00014320054],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006154218,0.00013901247,0.012908742,0.0000058237524,0.00007935161,0.000008276205,0.00073659787,0.0000015395578,0.000028952165,0.9511723,0.030937662,0.0039202305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000448625,0.000053136173,0.00066732394,0.0000436024,0.00004445805,0.000015350766,0.0077277855,0.000011799178,0.00021448596,0.04411998,0.9464167,0.00023677041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009968672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029306658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99012446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046366669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015530676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99742544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W205172034","doi":"10.21991/c9g959","title":"THINKING ABOUT THE UNTHINKABLE: PLANNING FOR A POSSIBLE SECESSION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Architecture, Modernity, and Design","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Political science; Management science; Law; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.03911955077063091,"score_gpt":0.25187427394075695,"score_spread":0.21275472317012606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W205172034","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040286593,0.0032556832,0.8892945,0.0003854518,0.0023790537,0.0009056091,0.00020021807,0.00078867236,0.09876214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98814607,0.000048868977,0.010068351,0.0009064679,0.00024818297,0.00024723384,0.000102834354,0.000032055606,0.00019991494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976741,0.000045043285,0.0005360516,0.00041829023,0.0004450972,0.00088142743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988038,0.00027663924,0.00011173374,0.00042856534,0.00018563951,0.00019361054],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004947976,0.00043190244,0.00033012283,0.00021828916,0.0024387098,0.00014724192,0.0006469288,0.0002567178,0.00014088237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017048088,0.00032986558,0.0002442395,0.00028776194,0.0021041974,0.0005853647,0.00014595065,0.00047693853,0.00007943008],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000092993,0.00005076211,0.005564473,0.00007774514,0.00012199786,0.000017223143,0.0010145919,0.040163923,0.00031135225,0.9403639,0.010518202,0.0017028723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004198901,0.00024745596,0.0032989178,0.0012574672,0.00032219366,0.0009958054,0.0035854205,0.13066855,0.0076680756,0.63051283,0.2149909,0.0022534418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002832128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000035163695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98411745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001518542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005033938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100591259","doi":"10.21991/c9808g","title":"ABORIGINAL RIGHTS AND DELGAMUUKW V. THE QUEEN","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Political science; Genealogy; Sociology; History; Zoology; Biology","score_opus":0.019150832168600387,"score_gpt":0.287044134190977,"score_spread":0.26789330202237666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100591259","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056055706,0.0010035402,0.015699172,0.004396174,0.0041463017,0.0013476093,0.000100732155,0.00026561596,0.91698515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918273,0.0015265273,0.0013232927,0.0004795324,0.0005384836,0.000026951082,0.000033395456,0.00000784614,0.004236674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744415,0.00021352974,0.00044571538,0.0004388584,0.00051848096,0.0009392742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850804,0.00019067927,0.00017777494,0.00032242134,0.00042308134,0.0003779984],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079980993,0.00026252583,0.00023578962,0.00016541564,0.020774618,0.00011832226,0.0004387046,0.00023724094,0.00051879307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017208466,0.0001831196,0.00011767391,0.0003696209,0.0128274895,0.0007670535,0.0000053039857,0.00031106843,0.00027608304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028407258,0.000102347374,0.0059170877,0.000008448082,0.00003860374,0.0000101449705,0.02129861,0.0000033718795,6.59486e-7,0.9713035,0.0011954899,0.000093284856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035221814,0.000032225817,0.0008522917,0.000042403724,0.000040268642,0.00007745204,0.0038763452,0.000011093262,0.000041540337,0.13625845,0.85814965,0.0002660453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09063165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30704913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9357716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027913632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019985916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98985904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108218549","doi":"10.21991/c9nq37","title":"A Time for Boldness? Exploring the Space for Senate Reform","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Legislature; Representation (politics); Democracy; Public administration; Political science; Redistricting; Cognitive reframing; Foundation (evidence); Work (physics); Law; Space (punctuation); Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.07303947354381972,"score_gpt":0.3052083573826834,"score_spread":0.2321688838388637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108218549","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027403956,0.002648014,0.36842927,0.18992484,0.020564802,0.008946014,0.0035414775,0.0009153364,0.3776263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98946285,0.000026550653,0.0010584958,0.0012468834,0.0011154395,0.0013393736,0.000059385875,0.000014497,0.0056765354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973158,0.000072926734,0.000455718,0.00041955625,0.0006060339,0.0011299135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979517,0.00039340087,0.00019156927,0.000304966,0.0006891264,0.00046927595],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001396533,0.00025466402,0.000325489,0.000073093346,0.0028011822,0.00017510622,0.00048258083,0.00015297196,0.000024856105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021649227,0.0001933109,0.00028897455,0.0002758243,0.0056909397,0.000935754,0.00010211379,0.00015033864,0.0001799352],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083442705,0.000043688033,0.00020387016,0.000018219096,0.000042825304,0.000001980888,0.0003414069,0.00012193107,0.000047360252,0.97140336,0.027323995,0.0003679163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012840322,0.000052746487,0.000039213304,0.00011896878,0.00003926469,0.000024435747,0.0042992244,0.00060711254,0.00018144898,0.06465593,0.92837316,0.00032446813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020503881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011832915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9620589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009908564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027432078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145615668","doi":"10.21991/c9cm1z","title":"THE CHARTER AND PUBLICATION BANS: A COMMENT ON DAGENAIS V. C.B.C.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Chemistry","score_opus":0.043121578666628774,"score_gpt":0.3021434292616512,"score_spread":0.2590218505950225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145615668","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032577957,0.001024648,0.011122186,0.17539813,0.0044143195,0.0013428732,0.00008990793,0.00030029783,0.80304986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896279,0.00025050587,0.0005573405,0.0077080806,0.00024264162,0.00021841965,0.00005171127,0.000007963728,0.0013354638],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978577,0.00017043743,0.0003971854,0.0004048962,0.0005369323,0.00063286244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984366,0.00029769354,0.00017490359,0.00040441312,0.00042935065,0.00025700638],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088274875,0.00021379896,0.00015857127,0.00014238131,0.0046647866,0.00028092077,0.00043639296,0.00015902589,0.00042684196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009592304,0.00017195924,0.00008846433,0.00032216273,0.008831135,0.0008427413,0.00010466379,0.00024636774,0.0004216851],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031944997,0.00011850584,0.0059582056,0.0000033295191,0.00003378821,0.0000018770037,0.0022569443,0.0000019769861,0.000009033456,0.9443102,0.044246644,0.0030275497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038833017,0.000050920506,0.0014129018,0.00004584935,0.000024261115,0.000016773613,0.006492185,0.00004691317,0.00010343048,0.03496352,0.95621675,0.00023817713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008261392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00063081214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9863701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003407233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010225993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152526808","doi":"10.21991/c92d47","title":"A CONSTITUTIONAL REVOLUTION: ISRAEL'S BASIC LAWS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.05232865365993809,"score_gpt":0.27447313081101754,"score_spread":0.22214447715107943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152526808","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035274008,0.0065663103,0.095385015,0.004238704,0.0056064697,0.001103414,0.00045608694,0.00070704817,0.8824096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914773,0.00030594764,0.002700722,0.0020682442,0.0006711167,0.00019482829,0.00010664834,0.000012417919,0.0024627834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99538743,0.00023004581,0.00086260214,0.000882208,0.0010933217,0.0015443818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99749553,0.00019755281,0.00030740735,0.00050637504,0.00085048046,0.00064267416],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084372086,0.00053752534,0.0005634215,0.00027183202,0.0050306735,0.00013857886,0.00070949056,0.0003967807,0.0009651094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00092470215,0.0005568543,0.0004422357,0.00079549465,0.036771804,0.0014636855,0.00029413492,0.0004681431,0.0020488058],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078543904,0.00023387825,0.096931055,0.000015644619,0.00014553804,0.00006712808,0.00040696032,0.000012589628,0.000025022648,0.8941786,0.0050747157,0.002830283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022657826,0.000108885004,0.0027585174,0.00028718024,0.00016764858,0.00036133802,0.018532012,0.00004040491,0.000120268975,0.105703585,0.8684527,0.0012016529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015644412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040516895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9879499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058448775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034002913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152932827","doi":"10.21991/c9pw9j","title":"TURP AMENDING THE CANADIAN CONSTITUTION: A MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.049771057810998484,"score_gpt":0.28602659274716935,"score_spread":0.23625553493617085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152932827","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001911653,0.00043887514,0.07184378,0.010170908,0.0014648191,0.0007631103,0.00034868286,0.00018998962,0.9128682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954141,0.000024286051,0.0008252682,0.0018915092,0.0002622058,0.00011857548,0.000033435866,0.000006242908,0.0014243999],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99629575,0.00020590136,0.0006602915,0.0005151174,0.000886453,0.0014364895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977564,0.00026627776,0.00021141408,0.00048682356,0.00037437663,0.0009047039],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011279593,0.0003176402,0.00044788758,0.0003507573,0.0066255047,0.00026784514,0.00072208943,0.00030837877,0.0026460625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010439405,0.00024957326,0.00047590717,0.0013956124,0.016969154,0.00065191236,0.00010170472,0.0003949556,0.00093892467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010571786,0.000055573506,0.022494268,0.0000064360615,0.0003226716,0.00004184595,0.0006460751,0.000051859686,0.0000032581777,0.97373986,0.0024927997,0.00013474932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051028724,0.000025281222,0.0044288365,0.000105523795,0.0005333878,0.00012304957,0.003599597,0.00035917826,0.00003707291,0.15496391,0.83467793,0.0006359341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31824917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6073223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99350244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011091325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059031374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153851746","doi":"10.21991/c90x08","title":"Tapping the Potential of Senate-Driven Reform: Proposals to Limit the Powers of the Senate","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Democracy; Politics; Supreme court; Status quo; Law; Power (physics); Separation of powers; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02554129898864058,"score_gpt":0.28203284412954194,"score_spread":0.25649154514090133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153851746","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12854789,0.0014894605,0.039953522,0.21734159,0.009842798,0.004564102,0.0013159178,0.00024776926,0.596697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958924,0.000034845903,0.00044213093,0.0024938371,0.00026681885,0.000055162713,0.00001350647,0.000009290546,0.00079201715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962694,0.00039029133,0.0007861461,0.0003576258,0.0013830122,0.00081351656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971554,0.00021556737,0.0004685526,0.000629615,0.001197529,0.0003333127],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012771555,0.0002952062,0.00038280693,0.00012756365,0.002709543,0.00008308747,0.0013039518,0.00017874141,0.00005525303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013766896,0.00016507009,0.00037637955,0.0009278253,0.025978327,0.00038732708,0.00046227375,0.00038141536,0.00006142236],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006159811,0.00006688476,0.0019685847,0.00001166214,0.00010845848,0.0000041623666,0.00060400716,0.0041751913,0.0007612465,0.9888388,0.003230033,0.00016935778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013955573,0.00012503249,0.00059131964,0.00049594115,0.000280027,0.00024325192,0.0499574,0.0005502826,0.0028625682,0.023052981,0.9197329,0.00071269955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034944909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012530216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96578586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005397275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012171512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162755870","doi":"10.21991/c91q1w","title":"Jane Austen and the Council of the Federation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sensibility; Pride; Possession (linguistics); Law; Wife; Battle; Sentence; Sociology; History; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0513180478118468,"score_gpt":0.2536156607948182,"score_spread":0.2022976129829714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162755870","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0058195037,0.0011695775,0.016301613,0.014543573,0.0019239829,0.0009559675,0.00018939412,0.000081934384,0.9590145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99455214,0.000090526446,0.00047758385,0.0018635574,0.00015063194,0.00005171416,0.00000848463,0.000004844109,0.0028005212],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755764,0.0002664611,0.0004875142,0.00027641925,0.00091734406,0.0004945918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99804986,0.00040532445,0.00027696014,0.0003215854,0.0007905257,0.00015573179],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011385023,0.00020578937,0.00028145342,0.00004802315,0.0038043126,0.000072172494,0.00045184963,0.00014896024,0.00027595295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013925642,0.00013076172,0.00020112138,0.00032018396,0.048403237,0.00040315394,0.00016956344,0.00024142153,0.000031996904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000870258,0.000045884284,0.008575842,0.0000071185177,0.00005644775,0.0000020316122,0.0013537534,0.0000330691,0.000014139465,0.9884119,0.0011849797,0.00022780066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024259586,0.00003821885,0.0019275007,0.00011698959,0.00017221477,0.00015124942,0.008960912,0.00011756427,0.00015231372,0.09268662,0.8928545,0.00039593436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042042877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023044567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98873264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005071954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02051242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163709787","doi":"10.21991/c9rh4g","title":"Time for Boldness on Senate Reform, Time for the Trudeau Plan","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Boldness; Plan (archaeology); Political science; Table (database); Law; Law and economics; Public administration; Economics; History; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.038237889304724666,"score_gpt":0.29062321518572165,"score_spread":0.252385325880997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163709787","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0069081765,0.0022492872,0.08015567,0.45366734,0.010329016,0.010751596,0.028483728,0.00083809503,0.40661708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.958973,0.000042172614,0.0005588866,0.012677714,0.0015135992,0.0007715171,0.00034501185,0.000026722018,0.025091391],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973747,0.00006819848,0.00043018578,0.00046708036,0.0006022442,0.0010575902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977926,0.0006286912,0.00022642224,0.00037264993,0.00047412593,0.0005055197],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010911155,0.00030179435,0.00032862637,0.00013665757,0.0032869582,0.00017106265,0.00061985885,0.00025217532,0.000109982924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015914973,0.00024427622,0.0003000309,0.0003171918,0.006301926,0.0005353257,0.00006563828,0.0001921878,0.00061379577],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022014865,0.000042561805,0.000036737514,0.000007567791,0.000054481177,0.000002956265,0.0002458672,0.0004777489,0.000027156319,0.7696321,0.22869986,0.00055281154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018860592,0.00010355638,0.000029748364,0.0000872561,0.000056754598,0.000032341315,0.0012280422,0.00175328,0.0001308817,0.035554975,0.9587503,0.00038681633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035343203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005076226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9520648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011221902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047057085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99801064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2173693669","doi":"10.21991/c9rm2r","title":"The Assisted Human Reproduction Act Reference and the Thin Line Between Health and Crime","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Legislature; Legislation; Law; Jurisdiction; Constitution; Government (linguistics); Political science; Reproduction; Criminal jurisdiction; Power (physics); Human rights; Public administration; Politics; Biology","score_opus":0.04897607700576859,"score_gpt":0.3266017884079739,"score_spread":0.27762571140220527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2173693669","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08527998,0.0366337,0.0129527105,0.5183334,0.003996858,0.006983706,0.00018794318,0.00076059136,0.33487114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996626,0.00068815914,0.000086662636,0.0010061057,0.00053747016,0.00011491951,0.00003329433,0.0000057894495,0.0009015608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997505,0.0003580613,0.0005781442,0.00046820298,0.0005021556,0.0005883971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981527,0.00052070845,0.0003235505,0.00030163256,0.00041468267,0.00028673085],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019994106,0.00020802894,0.00032918566,0.00006711614,0.011110664,0.00058619486,0.00029997446,0.00014929844,0.000035317476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015071281,0.00012715349,0.00007015773,0.00029953243,0.015224626,0.00068729254,0.00015607706,0.00035580673,0.000042548887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021181517,0.000015905367,0.009214937,0.000015767377,0.000040674004,5.178878e-7,0.0004943914,0.0000034938646,0.000016297776,0.98017627,0.0031958562,0.0068047214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002066903,0.00012450869,0.01627805,0.00024418617,0.00006293804,0.00007728211,0.01349073,0.000068922505,0.000033387263,0.23483013,0.7322524,0.0004705515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01662018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033384382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9113461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014706377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016203673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99017674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2173914137","doi":"10.21991/c95q2h","title":"A COURT IN NEED AND A FRIEND INDEED: AN ANALYSIS OF THE ARGUMENTS OF THE AMICUS CURIAE IN THE QUEBEC SECESSION REFERENCE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Secession; Political science; Referendum; Principle of legality; Sovereignty; Politics; Majority opinion; Advisory opinion; Government (linguistics); Dissenting opinion; Sociology; International law; International court; Public international law","score_opus":0.02473364440888928,"score_gpt":0.253101599269096,"score_spread":0.2283679548602067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2173914137","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9440396,0.00041587997,0.00032100215,0.0028349934,0.0007023175,0.0006881814,0.00031769625,0.000013309806,0.05066705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99942034,0.00004904349,0.000030175126,0.00026340768,0.0000150993965,0.0000247402,0.000011549667,0.0000021121298,0.00018355725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981782,0.0003125615,0.00044261687,0.00024425995,0.0005103648,0.00031203034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990757,0.00009820764,0.00026692217,0.00034952542,0.0001324632,0.0000771833],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007923066,0.000120241886,0.0002512434,0.00057555403,0.0011758279,0.000067479596,0.0006516093,0.00014697047,0.00014881717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028489408,0.000083888866,0.00013503853,0.0015824744,0.010361593,0.00045521132,0.00011694235,0.0002593684,0.0000024453677],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022454844,0.00010571929,0.18324006,0.000005967085,0.000037623093,0.000001974444,0.0052475026,0.00008287608,0.00005108061,0.8108603,0.00017669811,0.0001677897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016027248,0.000046100828,0.80969006,0.00037848105,0.00047009185,0.000015435411,0.08918213,0.00057661044,0.00007426696,0.027713878,0.06982643,0.00042378507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5245767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96901035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7831464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055683765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002908305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9923316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W22089926","doi":"10.21991/c9t08f","title":"Spain’s Multinational Constitution: a Lost Opportunity?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Human Rights and Immigration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Multinational corporation; Autonomy; Politics; Character (mathematics); State (computer science); Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.0663900262032204,"score_gpt":0.29104981188901496,"score_spread":0.22465978568579456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W22089926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040093632,0.0003447057,0.09320213,0.0058529275,0.0031865383,0.0010839616,0.00030527706,0.00044097807,0.89157414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890521,0.00010447025,0.0032395564,0.0020047782,0.00044334895,0.000094917756,0.00025573143,0.000011584673,0.0047934675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962585,0.00024480312,0.0007957738,0.0006717087,0.0009902997,0.0010389314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99743944,0.0001789866,0.00031551364,0.00040591622,0.00091701926,0.0007431252],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009374771,0.00041660192,0.00037937146,0.00044128305,0.0045290054,0.0001893461,0.00056721986,0.00036747148,0.010925314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010192936,0.0004053803,0.00030063078,0.0005483198,0.015490972,0.0019189061,0.00013062025,0.00039985616,0.0019399094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056208504,0.0002956517,0.00950534,0.000009559265,0.00007066046,0.000058585294,0.001197405,0.00002898122,0.00004798506,0.97906643,0.008109556,0.0015536143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014715674,0.0000819144,0.0017076766,0.00012964946,0.00007816746,0.00014513163,0.0075428877,0.0002124813,0.0001875861,0.07404676,0.9135821,0.0008140812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013344663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037804374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9850428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053129584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006059442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2230186173","doi":"10.21991/c9zt0x","title":"LAVIGNE V OPSEU: STUMBLING TOWARDS A FREEDOM FROM ASSOCIATION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Freedom of association; Degrees of freedom (physics and chemistry); Political science; Physics; Philosophy; Law; Epistemology; Human rights; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.03414039587409379,"score_gpt":0.23071425512414426,"score_spread":0.19657385925005047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2230186173","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058765262,0.0008805158,0.10251338,0.005341396,0.008127131,0.0010140392,0.00035966226,0.001274775,0.8217238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99125355,0.000015827096,0.0025192765,0.0036598984,0.0012966836,0.000072892915,0.0004298281,0.000020073667,0.00073198805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99719685,0.000024569115,0.00074482773,0.000595698,0.0007170071,0.00072105404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981586,0.00008195909,0.00066094036,0.00035709687,0.0006721156,0.00006931507],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045129698,0.00040345255,0.00041174414,0.00040641238,0.0010738963,0.00040801594,0.00045543874,0.00028042606,0.0031244974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009667557,0.0004020025,0.0002628225,0.00062066555,0.0010537255,0.0029579233,0.0002738216,0.00034296964,0.0027935288],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063452535,0.00016637135,0.11393121,0.000015047539,0.00011328242,0.000021889839,0.00006824144,0.000116451345,0.00018846293,0.8728232,0.011619849,0.00087256887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002875815,0.000024666984,0.023353515,0.00021851252,0.00025792947,0.00001864679,0.001916591,0.0032114657,0.0004385923,0.0642633,0.9023354,0.0010855756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006837533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00081884244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93248826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030211022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004201098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2240457575","doi":"10.21991/c93t05","title":"CANADA’S INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS OBLIGATIONS AND DISADVANTAGED MEMBERS OF SOCIETY: FINALLY INTO THE SPOTLIGHT?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Human rights; Political science; Public administration; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.018820366910343823,"score_gpt":0.26534374948808753,"score_spread":0.2465233825777437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2240457575","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15782216,0.0011621767,0.008210292,0.14872913,0.0047691925,0.0016989787,0.003271847,0.00018597441,0.6741502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99522424,0.000050728777,0.00056761404,0.0021804592,0.00014324611,0.000029811694,0.00004231761,0.0000048525667,0.0017567229],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821573,0.00006311416,0.0004107785,0.0002937107,0.0005803343,0.00043634686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988979,0.0001556477,0.00023386796,0.00022130446,0.0002628318,0.00022846079],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033831692,0.00018373631,0.00019421446,0.00007352194,0.0036031876,0.000055565262,0.00048217262,0.00011314863,0.0003882241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019820435,0.00015740124,0.000140404,0.00025173297,0.009088406,0.00050489407,0.00010425439,0.0002051582,0.000007600523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012868408,0.00003165989,0.006804728,0.0000061650685,0.00008162647,0.0000075389644,0.0020718572,0.000020740732,0.00004729504,0.9505144,0.040266078,0.0001350699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050889584,0.000015980926,0.0054600853,0.00007212699,0.000041318755,0.000025625752,0.002795612,0.00004808688,0.00023083667,0.08034599,0.9101969,0.00025857327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9070827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98198754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8701684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045021973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048541515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W22466156","doi":"10.21991/c91h3k","title":"Intergovernmental Relations, Legitimacy, and the Atlantic Accords","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Government (linguistics); Political science; Federalism; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.022181112814359208,"score_gpt":0.25546724963577555,"score_spread":0.23328613682141636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W22466156","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04677738,0.0014339294,0.04219242,0.016702171,0.002709888,0.0012254472,0.0002188431,0.00021593322,0.888524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996244,0.000117270865,0.0003384378,0.0012620111,0.00019293047,0.000078515535,0.000012123418,0.000005543623,0.0017491687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979719,0.00015745492,0.0004109276,0.00031663658,0.00053877465,0.0006043242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989802,0.00029537998,0.00016382203,0.00021482211,0.000114363116,0.00023140332],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006301775,0.00019247553,0.00024401039,0.0000516502,0.0022978853,0.00011755472,0.000327676,0.00013459903,0.0005369323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007528314,0.00014391671,0.00014809163,0.00019131292,0.016045358,0.0006949245,0.00017033923,0.00022538705,0.0002423539],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007501575,0.000041017378,0.06585179,0.000004305947,0.000039435323,0.000008838795,0.0006098719,0.0000019639554,0.0000035880123,0.9291236,0.003961753,0.0002788156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003168695,0.000038174192,0.011906706,0.00018572985,0.00008663557,0.00019675012,0.005804311,0.00020927943,0.000029499419,0.16270418,0.8151762,0.0004938717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020242754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004722099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94946665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029213127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008724854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99900097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2251567988","doi":"10.21991/c9kd3h","title":"DISTINGUISHING ZUNDEL AND KEEGSTRA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Lexicography and Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.04903300525343404,"score_gpt":0.21992122043264506,"score_spread":0.17088821517921102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2251567988","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027109047,0.003086105,0.009435272,0.0011457824,0.0027118186,0.000425921,0.00042446333,0.00043041422,0.9552312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99657834,0.000050968156,0.0012251182,0.0010016774,0.00028895342,0.0000488803,0.000049038987,0.000010061762,0.0007469515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983504,0.000029851672,0.00039418798,0.00041927854,0.00024716693,0.0005591067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917346,0.00008667108,0.00012974035,0.00021653702,0.00022578047,0.00016779748],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017190012,0.00030636007,0.00026904308,0.00019265001,0.0023066988,0.00019295649,0.00020133975,0.00008435485,0.001484484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019149124,0.00026799194,0.00016679554,0.000082729704,0.010360155,0.0006947656,0.00016020276,0.00023985068,0.00010155379],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032850352,0.00008573717,0.0104632275,0.000026253076,0.00011901092,0.00004524602,0.0056123314,0.0000039335846,0.0000107904825,0.9801074,0.0025112953,0.0009818804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002206002,0.0002044684,0.0030703866,0.0004228213,0.00023831171,0.00047060932,0.056118235,0.0002206487,0.00016777018,0.13989979,0.7955233,0.001457663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043269957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010052751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9694693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040350318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001953026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2252930250","doi":"10.21991/c92h3w","title":"The European Union’s Trap of Constitutional Politics: From the Convention Towards the Failure of the Treaty of Lisbon","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Ratification; European union; Political science; Treaty of Lisbon; Law; Convention; Referendum; Member state; European integration; Politics; Public administration; Member states; International trade","score_opus":0.04195058338636457,"score_gpt":0.26059772555396254,"score_spread":0.21864714216759798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2252930250","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020387562,0.0024458673,0.011883771,0.028073112,0.0034898054,0.0012209788,0.0020587503,0.00007022384,0.9303699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99802583,0.0002862455,0.00013615664,0.0003611595,0.00025310804,0.000020902715,0.00003890799,0.0000074846384,0.00087020115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99619824,0.0012066996,0.0009038838,0.0002897133,0.0009591298,0.00044231457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968697,0.00084007933,0.0006890772,0.0005315726,0.0009835226,0.00008604826],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020506678,0.0002520625,0.00029840056,0.0000578525,0.0034361111,0.000050726267,0.0013863757,0.000094903866,0.00020496632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012247103,0.00012589729,0.0004903385,0.00037293497,0.047875915,0.00030020525,0.00032135157,0.00030458017,0.00002817197],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030664207,0.00011083506,0.017337013,0.0000073548445,0.00022983072,0.0000014692367,0.001178338,0.000038839546,0.00014748935,0.97564685,0.0046267174,0.00064458296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016047836,0.000103984254,0.07533417,0.00052249094,0.00034011758,0.0000368981,0.023638861,0.00004969561,0.002787806,0.10839675,0.7867806,0.00040387182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029891403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029113055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97763824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013667149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001732954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99786127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253764572","doi":"10.21991/c9dd3z","title":"HOW CAN INFRINGEMENTS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF ABORIGINAL PEOPLES BE JUSTIFIED?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Trilogy; Constitution; Bill of rights; Political science; Government (linguistics); Fishing; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.039783466332995385,"score_gpt":0.28808667613706007,"score_spread":0.24830320980406467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253764572","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2977123,0.0026143794,0.023355754,0.0391472,0.013325831,0.004726763,0.0047143996,0.0004823853,0.613921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968599,0.000123287,0.0015527101,0.0002664418,0.00015859815,0.00007573741,0.000043607364,0.00000577221,0.00091395504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99653697,0.00018693558,0.0007271467,0.0004718309,0.0012744056,0.000802715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997366,0.00027302213,0.00061420107,0.0003856484,0.0011229228,0.000238175],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047061098,0.00038129318,0.0005309743,0.00015996525,0.003382366,0.0000683738,0.0008592427,0.00025512287,0.00033319433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009171734,0.00028275404,0.00041466823,0.0006520495,0.041336868,0.0007360562,0.00024425483,0.00031351557,0.000013695584],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048786118,0.00017915518,0.062306732,0.000043838998,0.00019825317,0.0000050611916,0.002589833,0.000054899156,0.00034382794,0.9320113,0.0021364496,0.0000818412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038985831,0.00015666873,0.029468482,0.0009391786,0.0006535459,0.00008756812,0.04640145,0.00004720988,0.008420222,0.061156526,0.84722847,0.0015420911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005426072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010534616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8708548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042465606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003363442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253773316","doi":"10.21991/c9wq08","title":"DEFERRING DELAY: A COMMENT ON R. V. POTVIN","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"History and advancements in chemistry","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.03946471336735245,"score_gpt":0.24927720253388924,"score_spread":0.20981248916653678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253773316","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016130522,0.0005502466,0.032460913,0.0013696487,0.0015168744,0.00023372482,0.00047049223,0.00048875576,0.94677883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915691,0.00003299802,0.0023842892,0.004056765,0.00016084399,0.00012889829,0.00018736755,0.000020892301,0.0014588318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973671,0.000018759618,0.00062027894,0.0006865869,0.0004923089,0.0008149527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985705,0.00010066413,0.0002125054,0.0006423219,0.0001450324,0.0003289761],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015065887,0.00046970416,0.00034391144,0.00012456464,0.0012798307,0.000039423245,0.0005069157,0.00025747588,0.005847688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017998091,0.00048580818,0.00025473966,0.00016734697,0.0031450875,0.00038483492,0.0001964139,0.000519783,0.0006485323],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018206936,0.00047156992,0.005653992,0.000060884373,0.0001227957,0.00013888795,0.000076316384,0.0002728818,0.004362052,0.976923,0.010607014,0.0011285573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021007315,0.000060302315,0.000028701275,0.00046698353,0.000075472766,0.00044403985,0.0009748577,0.00017583347,0.06298923,0.013296828,0.9184822,0.0009048548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029270279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011460757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9754386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005829943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005764935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255017218","doi":"10.21991/c9n37j","title":"RJR-MACDONALD V. CANADA ON THE FREEDOM TO ADVERTISE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of the press; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05143440772711355,"score_gpt":0.2475788336267206,"score_spread":0.19614442589960704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255017218","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015860897,0.00011659232,0.008754322,0.03427944,0.0044584773,0.0022122967,0.00020463513,0.00023586,0.93387747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852997,0.000008594662,0.0003017442,0.011134911,0.00025555838,0.00019918122,0.000013443688,0.000013775379,0.0027730644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996333,0.00027082828,0.00052451674,0.0005908211,0.0011941907,0.0010866325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99784684,0.0004755322,0.00011656592,0.00055335433,0.0005066703,0.0005010168],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007371436,0.00035632166,0.00029304507,0.00016158147,0.0043389746,0.00010796631,0.0010301785,0.00015204289,0.0044398108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002452411,0.00026590296,0.00016213462,0.00067714194,0.005604144,0.00036463595,0.00021912434,0.00042700444,0.0012539274],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011772316,0.00016961886,0.0032351646,0.000002122526,0.00006221076,0.00004919484,0.0012174508,0.00020781276,0.000020648891,0.89594,0.09861215,0.00036591405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068927667,0.00022309531,0.00071146834,0.00011550329,0.00005052882,0.000040188246,0.015399789,0.00013378689,0.00042598625,0.015473131,0.96602005,0.00071722706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4915206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8271947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96943885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009706127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008190671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255134970","doi":"10.21991/c98q2f","title":"WOMEN IN THE AFTERMATH OF MEECH LAKE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Vietnamese History and Culture Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Archaeology; Environmental protection; Environmental planning","score_opus":0.039183269670866896,"score_gpt":0.2643521552144258,"score_spread":0.2251688855435589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255134970","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029354267,0.0011867714,0.0024506946,0.004964764,0.0014378999,0.0007345056,0.00016482502,0.00009920426,0.95960706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99832284,0.00005320481,0.00024886357,0.0006354327,0.00007537399,0.00017258272,0.000012229503,0.0000033414194,0.0004761174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979507,0.00019701665,0.0004200183,0.0002556424,0.0004951263,0.00068151153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999233,0.000060311326,0.00014888633,0.00024106675,0.0001997404,0.00011699629],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011359957,0.0001812355,0.00027819938,0.00013669598,0.0018701741,0.000024068455,0.0005069558,0.00013386623,0.0006260538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004276651,0.00013721909,0.00014131705,0.0004899283,0.009428397,0.00046530904,0.000075457196,0.00021350852,0.00008418949],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004178533,0.00015554873,0.0164317,0.000010662648,0.00003164807,0.00002063188,0.04050064,0.0000072026473,0.000020905674,0.93954855,0.0029153232,0.00031541643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081628497,0.00006708619,0.0049345056,0.00010285049,0.000031030533,0.00004579154,0.21942265,0.0000048499783,0.000029198041,0.075447366,0.69875836,0.00033998175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014799228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066734035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9689686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020208562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010663057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256842593","doi":"10.21991/c9mm3w","title":"GOVERNING THE CANADIAN STATE: THE CONSTITUTION IN AN ERA OF GLOBALIZATION, NEO-LIBERALISM, POPULISM, DECENTRALIZATION AND JUDICIAL ACTIVISM","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Peasant; Political science; Law; State (computer science); Charter; Limited government; Liberalism; Politics","score_opus":0.03275263109901524,"score_gpt":0.2720643479479774,"score_spread":0.23931171684896216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256842593","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4194772,0.008303882,0.061389845,0.057208758,0.008679138,0.0064505874,0.0019123628,0.000517198,0.43606105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997357,0.00040238842,0.00020192146,0.0016783599,0.00015398706,0.000071598995,0.00009770305,0.00000735953,0.000029646502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968518,0.00036437972,0.00070354406,0.00046476402,0.0007625586,0.0008529644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828225,0.00017349186,0.0003191721,0.00027764324,0.00062821346,0.00031921949],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009918971,0.00031442323,0.00034192344,0.00017824375,0.0062209754,0.0001739459,0.0005149883,0.00022467606,0.00014790747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068445073,0.00024008685,0.000110967354,0.00094709947,0.018029468,0.0012318561,0.00012252625,0.0004237491,0.00002348794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058704918,0.000069773356,0.14909466,0.000004488466,0.00004281323,0.000010542004,0.0027640816,0.00044630206,0.000012358618,0.84586644,0.00049139874,0.0011384268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029903755,0.0001798761,0.24325651,0.00055594015,0.0002824876,0.00018432498,0.027457975,0.0009883121,0.00021053801,0.483459,0.23893763,0.0014970152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40965113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8140559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57787985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006548238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00607634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257184070","doi":"10.21991/c9x672","title":"THE QUEBEC SECESSION REFERENCE: GOODBYE TO PART V?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Political science; Regional science; Law; Geography; Politics","score_opus":0.05233258830757859,"score_gpt":0.2983534651728099,"score_spread":0.24602087686523133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257184070","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0073237414,0.00078447646,0.019341161,0.017667193,0.0049417983,0.0009798622,0.00028943014,0.0002829531,0.9483894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849022,0.00009957499,0.0002956778,0.0017933147,0.00039299994,0.00014946962,0.000017555541,0.000007325992,0.012341886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968767,0.00017168351,0.00054260035,0.0004536666,0.00078460824,0.0011707473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819636,0.00026166972,0.00017270846,0.00039947167,0.00035638717,0.0006133952],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082205114,0.00024868277,0.00024781423,0.00007125374,0.0049523055,0.00019083335,0.0006835835,0.0002261986,0.0005409331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011193341,0.00018350249,0.00014881388,0.00042222696,0.0065527665,0.0005929249,0.00018568066,0.00027651145,0.001205264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003921183,0.0000543001,0.0048892186,0.0000041787166,0.000022988408,0.00000896074,0.00035407644,0.0000068014742,0.000020775413,0.9654326,0.026938958,0.0022279478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028721092,0.000031389744,0.0026167422,0.0001325599,0.000015054567,0.000014690281,0.0024181097,0.000009372521,0.00007727184,0.03352855,0.9605631,0.00030591525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047103554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0941972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97757846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004703871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002752816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257186342","doi":"10.21991/c9436h","title":"REFLECTIONS ON THE 1995 QUÉBEC REFERENDUM: PROBLEMS AND POSSIBILITIES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"New Zealand Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.14678896515668724,"score_gpt":0.25634628079990157,"score_spread":0.10955731564321433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257186342","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051152475,0.0033982869,0.005378098,0.013777983,0.0015800158,0.0006458874,0.00058562343,0.00017043317,0.9233112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99473804,0.00034906808,0.00017769099,0.0016664814,0.00011245794,0.00015402958,0.000019101148,0.000010389336,0.0027727194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983311,0.000022062213,0.00061394856,0.0004920591,0.000055089673,0.00048572046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915254,0.00013579056,0.00022982512,0.00029991465,0.000060938044,0.00012101875],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003577682,0.0002576557,0.00036702843,0.00015399735,0.00197911,0.00008262065,0.00022259366,0.00013675596,0.00078214635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021253321,0.00021613615,0.0001555414,0.0001607354,0.0035506384,0.0003375452,0.00012450805,0.0002645021,0.0007526104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024567766,0.0000732893,0.03448558,0.0000083260475,0.000112205424,0.000001690996,0.0008276404,0.000015609197,0.0000028195843,0.95965713,0.004659723,0.00013144682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006898654,0.00012046748,0.008526921,0.000050959494,0.00001971942,0.000050627812,0.0040670238,0.00007924152,0.000023151673,0.6281333,0.35778296,0.00045572745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075517637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006029488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9435856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025228612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023880122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99932015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257398601","doi":"10.21991/c9h95m","title":"THE SILENT MAJORITY SPEAKS: RJR-MACDONALD INC. V. CANADA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.02223631377992769,"score_gpt":0.25081210476897897,"score_spread":0.2285757909890513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257398601","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010818301,0.0008684019,0.01678905,0.022983791,0.009895921,0.0009927342,0.00060875795,0.00024079569,0.93680227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944409,0.00015319153,0.00036446773,0.001744451,0.00042095952,0.00007317208,0.00011206953,0.000007709506,0.0026830682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99695045,0.00015617297,0.0005453977,0.00039163991,0.0011225919,0.0008337483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815863,0.00033030563,0.00023148594,0.00028721837,0.0007039492,0.00028839422],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007353499,0.00025594665,0.00020041745,0.00008175443,0.005589501,0.0001469093,0.000680815,0.00015703257,0.00080586306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006798566,0.0002132101,0.0001453302,0.00028095467,0.0054457216,0.0006107466,0.00014127036,0.00031267927,0.00023186835],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045567773,0.00006321797,0.014632402,0.0000033579945,0.00006116945,0.000021470363,0.00016633567,0.000036922494,0.0000119190845,0.9618806,0.022209803,0.0008672049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045253808,0.000021212058,0.0031175525,0.00004233537,0.000029588411,0.000033569977,0.0029090215,0.00011389178,0.00017171525,0.06037086,0.93239576,0.0003419417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5175725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8718858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9836226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010274554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00824083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257517042","doi":"10.21991/c91h26","title":"APPOINTMENTS TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Remand (court procedure); Original jurisdiction; Majority opinion; Certiorari","score_opus":0.035827875122077656,"score_gpt":0.25622851208617875,"score_spread":0.2204006369641011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257517042","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009609344,0.0010099428,0.030942697,0.036422737,0.005117472,0.0015221797,0.00064683816,0.00014312087,0.91458565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959182,0.000055522785,0.00059638696,0.0025592365,0.00020898864,0.00010590484,0.000018475417,0.000005716375,0.00053156546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970681,0.00011070919,0.0005642658,0.00037825658,0.0010386982,0.00083993893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983624,0.00016759786,0.00018106954,0.0003025962,0.0006467297,0.00033959158],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059672265,0.00025802586,0.0003282754,0.00011736369,0.0034893404,0.000033252938,0.00068286096,0.00010862991,0.00065484905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00075582403,0.00020683518,0.00016309565,0.00060356874,0.007532881,0.0002988402,0.00023053058,0.000190102,0.00013076342],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057548186,0.00008560932,0.013316591,0.000003927457,0.000108073014,0.000012401475,0.000655551,0.000099268174,0.000020314115,0.9478134,0.037334584,0.0004927655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060028664,0.00006651537,0.005335982,0.00011678882,0.000076909986,0.00003288033,0.013032776,0.00001842041,0.00044061302,0.06290104,0.91690046,0.00047732185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41694096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71434516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9863089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004737151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008925596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257961456","doi":"10.21991/c9h08n","title":"ABORIGINAL SELF-DETERMINATION WITHIN CANADA: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; Political science; International law; International human rights law; Self-determination","score_opus":0.031012645982357485,"score_gpt":0.3012560663024693,"score_spread":0.27024342032011184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257961456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09115054,0.00023793704,0.0018290397,0.0062073176,0.008890681,0.0014931649,0.00020687772,0.0004170399,0.88956743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937008,0.000058139947,0.0047379094,0.0006285604,0.00016774319,0.00012053986,0.00010761172,0.000006879433,0.0004718396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967664,0.00013494307,0.0007242141,0.00051636447,0.0010173263,0.00084075925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858385,0.0000806793,0.00026724135,0.00015938914,0.0006536484,0.00025518404],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000560987,0.00032044319,0.00030470744,0.00015585798,0.004004212,0.00009755349,0.00054743653,0.00020027779,0.000482546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012730288,0.00030483658,0.0000851333,0.00039838286,0.0035430703,0.0010204925,0.000099256686,0.00032715482,0.00006994308],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025271238,0.00015996065,0.03180774,0.0000062253266,0.000071278126,0.0000630974,0.00335646,0.000022131422,0.000019062052,0.96313095,0.0011575035,0.00018031341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014175478,0.000024204135,0.01096807,0.00014492105,0.00003379796,0.000031018753,0.00483673,0.000056675715,0.00036032056,0.017047774,0.96442384,0.0006550783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5549487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94439167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9632664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032782415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030647076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258654751","doi":"10.21991/c9c96r","title":"THE SOCIAL UNION FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT: HOLLOWING OUT THE STATE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agreement; Political science; State (computer science); European union; Economics; Computer science; International trade; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05950204359991424,"score_gpt":0.3295528967158161,"score_spread":0.2700508531159019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258654751","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063043963,0.0022564721,0.052651975,0.089506686,0.012401557,0.0017511349,0.00022020612,0.00044908526,0.8344585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99347246,0.0007082575,0.00018278757,0.001854718,0.0009632769,0.00012326812,0.0000109246575,0.000009120214,0.0026751934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99686104,0.0003503693,0.00050434395,0.00034293675,0.0008026516,0.0011386548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984795,0.00052040897,0.00023770738,0.00027759036,0.00032298654,0.00016179941],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001551305,0.00028731496,0.00025419716,0.00007942934,0.025133338,0.00021655684,0.00077395997,0.00023495176,0.000093715935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010071364,0.00017480645,0.00034265936,0.0004705486,0.021258572,0.0005178629,0.00026939507,0.0005160456,0.0003043668],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033362663,0.000047226647,0.002975521,0.0000033017363,0.00015794196,0.000005643899,0.014278607,0.000008827013,0.0000045176234,0.97372,0.0050420705,0.0037229517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047142658,0.000029288938,0.0016988013,0.00007831803,0.00007151547,0.0000074313953,0.06354069,0.000013814524,0.000048923703,0.6207056,0.31293917,0.00039499675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013810594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043785064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9871681,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025795682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013249656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.981405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258867067","doi":"10.21991/c93099","title":"PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT AND THE CHARTER","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Psychiatry; Medicine; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03568758503150582,"score_gpt":0.2931249830787294,"score_spread":0.2574373980472236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258867067","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009039916,0.004872598,0.19617493,0.013327966,0.0024108985,0.002210111,0.00027735706,0.0005077884,0.7711784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99223953,0.00032738544,0.0020540054,0.002457942,0.00014769635,0.0011151785,0.000031939122,0.00001282549,0.0016134868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983711,0.00007616835,0.00042227207,0.0004940193,0.00013726483,0.0004991804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892807,0.00010407918,0.00014775124,0.00058544724,0.00008475078,0.00014987704],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021212525,0.00029870143,0.00027695537,0.00015341266,0.0009826192,0.000043499032,0.00028036267,0.00015971469,0.0018134996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013198304,0.00019768396,0.00020818617,0.0002759355,0.0061032637,0.00016423847,0.000043570417,0.0001693934,0.00044025015],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002689317,0.0002644366,0.006953977,0.0000020579876,0.00014485784,0.000004217122,0.00039435914,7.017877e-7,0.000021770256,0.97854584,0.008463421,0.0049354546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008484794,0.00026769447,0.005154186,0.00002844232,0.00017137358,0.0009370749,0.0015602608,0.00008588918,0.00011368107,0.22601041,0.75660753,0.00057863124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024245365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005306428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9831996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007044352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001856705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99909896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259456743","doi":"10.21991/c91t1x","title":"R. V. SHARPE AND THE DEFENCE OF ARTISTIC MERIT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Supreme court; Law; Pornography; Relation (database); Political science; Child pornography; Criminal code; Criminal law; Criminology; Sociology; The Internet; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04926249681537862,"score_gpt":0.29832964825374386,"score_spread":0.24906715143836525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259456743","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18702038,0.00936006,0.13447857,0.005108127,0.0076530874,0.0023498514,0.00086504285,0.00067051157,0.6524944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974237,0.000040506482,0.00090607506,0.0006015466,0.000050927112,0.00018069029,0.000029904186,0.000009809244,0.0007568348],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978358,0.00012325261,0.00066997705,0.00051961414,0.00026521468,0.00058610423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846786,0.00028578128,0.00026394363,0.000635146,0.0002159474,0.00013131826],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004548274,0.0002866536,0.00044494768,0.000204273,0.0005980648,0.000020995554,0.00046774393,0.00027291614,0.001488934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035101693,0.00022141563,0.00015516067,0.00032674463,0.022886064,0.00019510869,0.00022124438,0.00032814682,0.00021986649],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032653654,0.00019565904,0.04814076,0.000010441869,0.000115867,0.00003924008,0.00037009217,0.00000143426,0.00014356029,0.94776493,0.0011220466,0.0017694068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01957041,0.0008205561,0.060931835,0.00032536243,0.001088841,0.007719182,0.019356223,0.0003058761,0.0025465528,0.71735436,0.16793574,0.0020450929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005631272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013073342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81040335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042549866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029990164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99942386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259807456","doi":"10.21991/c9b09g","title":"Droits scolaires collectifs en concurrence ou en complémentarité : Langue et religion dans le droit constitutionnel de gestion des écoles de langue française au Canada","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01776081312055141,"score_gpt":0.2214406257598572,"score_spread":0.2036798126393058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259807456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12524363,0.01690467,0.22259171,0.037526414,0.014749959,0.0028489227,0.007795794,0.000626516,0.5717124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896571,0.001054751,0.0016794027,0.0018238876,0.0004893038,0.0001783783,0.0003221518,0.000029525007,0.00476552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947301,0.00081462413,0.00090974144,0.0008855908,0.0008446333,0.0018153207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970509,0.00058840035,0.00037038833,0.00043999086,0.0004946722,0.0010556852],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013453645,0.0005998806,0.0006364198,0.00061247556,0.0073518534,0.0003003426,0.0008350947,0.0007206954,0.00094492594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001172994,0.0008560466,0.00033729358,0.0010099941,0.022622256,0.001444464,0.00021105217,0.00092456664,0.00017566503],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008553085,0.00034635508,0.024867045,0.00012553085,0.0001788789,0.00034813888,0.00749122,0.0017438334,0.00017225464,0.9252846,0.037665054,0.0016915456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025312882,0.00014257761,0.021335036,0.0017491047,0.00039946,0.0013501501,0.017729199,0.00088395167,0.00030792214,0.04030396,0.9117041,0.0015632005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99734706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8849807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018002471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08027656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261014824","doi":"10.21991/c9g08b","title":"THE NEW ABORTION LEGISLATION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Abortion; Business; Political science; Law; Pregnancy; Biology","score_opus":0.043105327384802196,"score_gpt":0.28517399184236925,"score_spread":0.24206866445756706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261014824","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031740885,0.008969396,0.38297555,0.0711381,0.0063666874,0.0033963677,0.00007377904,0.0017418687,0.49359736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99325716,0.00033623696,0.003749734,0.00093392486,0.00024439098,0.00008170104,0.000060027694,0.000009704465,0.0013271153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791306,0.000028949951,0.0005421738,0.00047492638,0.00040006192,0.0006408192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846965,0.000081681006,0.00019325144,0.0006047701,0.00038453506,0.0002661271],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031287418,0.00024654827,0.00025628056,0.00018416939,0.0014647935,0.000042128253,0.00020051489,0.0002072435,0.00015342694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00094589405,0.00017541432,0.00017306615,0.00042017928,0.004239484,0.0004450601,0.000089252644,0.00036301915,0.00035032377],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026833342,0.00008005195,0.033454925,0.000011083131,0.00006113948,0.00001827568,0.000034051962,0.000009607564,0.00023428195,0.9386974,0.014391126,0.012739726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024099597,0.00033577046,0.038435295,0.00016073871,0.00013256381,0.0013573212,0.0010424139,0.00019335038,0.004901389,0.17033643,0.7802726,0.00042215554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000117653544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007811242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96151626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020243485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024063005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263326183","doi":"10.21991/c96h2r","title":"THE MEECH LAKE ACCORD: THE END OF THE BEGINNING--OR THE BEGINNING OF THE END?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Art, Politics, and Modernism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"End-to-end principle; Dead end; End of history; Geography; Computer science; Political science; Psychology; Law; Computer security","score_opus":0.060998031478656754,"score_gpt":0.24247234674091703,"score_spread":0.18147431526226027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263326183","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019808896,0.0026736637,0.0066155763,0.072364196,0.015730074,0.0034162318,0.00279747,0.00022638086,0.8763675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870994,0.000072590374,0.00004694174,0.0024884264,0.00045096184,0.000107456806,0.000018420867,0.00001794489,0.0096978545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99701864,0.00021071799,0.0008400575,0.00034980816,0.0007717925,0.0008089829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968313,0.00076801854,0.00063158525,0.0011829217,0.0004976713,0.000088507935],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008214918,0.00039333655,0.00035201377,0.00007009365,0.0074221166,0.00015342652,0.0018001198,0.0001298056,0.0008796265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055595505,0.00014184364,0.0005432242,0.00005360995,0.04254189,0.00037990985,0.0006795675,0.0005860202,0.000040585157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006149797,0.00007897001,0.0039182203,0.000018286359,0.00018963347,0.0000019973816,0.0083303815,0.000098856755,0.000029608162,0.9757137,0.010898354,0.00066053116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063045055,0.00005462809,0.0016887838,0.00019473617,0.00021543844,0.00012274014,0.015849547,0.00021933719,0.00088594906,0.072008625,0.9078432,0.00028659272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00093387376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02278853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9672905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008305855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018225749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99504304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268481372","doi":"10.21991/c9238n","title":"The Bilateral Amending Formula as a Mechanism for the Entrenchment of Property Rights","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Charter; Constitution; Legislature; Property rights; Law; Political science; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021187758004127085,"score_gpt":0.28794909136173163,"score_spread":0.26676133335760455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268481372","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010699546,0.0009825996,0.2583028,0.21135783,0.0037624463,0.012527165,0.00052092894,0.00035164825,0.50149506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936732,0.00010021051,0.000718921,0.0006428426,0.00017703942,0.0012595608,0.000024399395,0.000004020691,0.0033997917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979381,0.00005695265,0.0005066815,0.00029996716,0.0005089619,0.00068934885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99805754,0.00061400974,0.00023256734,0.00034403353,0.0005889463,0.0001628776],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000517032,0.00019884962,0.00018849249,0.000060428636,0.0074700727,0.00027218,0.00063384144,0.000115109055,0.0002483546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003168066,0.0000975361,0.00024434077,0.0002524581,0.0051104873,0.0005327778,0.00014043528,0.0001609249,0.00016627873],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016073269,0.00005642313,0.00023159788,0.000005626443,0.00006890071,4.1333868e-7,0.0002398747,0.000080856196,0.00030338464,0.99291396,0.004751583,0.001331321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004497082,0.000034861303,0.000041274365,0.00003758899,0.000040711748,0.000011658464,0.0029199375,0.0011140247,0.0007711404,0.35615286,0.63826174,0.00016451787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042643463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016689277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9829737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021732677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011402767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99759704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268996978","doi":"10.21991/c9d95p","title":"TWO OPTIONS FOR A SOVEREIGN QUEBEC","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"European Socioeconomic and Political Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Business; Financial system; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07290824728729946,"score_gpt":0.2480521876421851,"score_spread":0.17514394035488562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268996978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003551014,0.0041062883,0.29310134,0.001860613,0.002015401,0.0007747413,0.0025770613,0.00020427757,0.69180924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837852,0.00011793924,0.009111626,0.0021044852,0.00026593485,0.00023428265,0.00013272847,0.00002124948,0.004226559],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975993,0.00001883632,0.0008944155,0.00061993254,0.000053752017,0.0008137539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883664,0.00015053026,0.00027869313,0.0003510155,0.00013498307,0.00024814904],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035616852,0.0003206561,0.0005089778,0.0001939545,0.0011011605,0.000075095006,0.00034601678,0.00013241539,0.0015206463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000257493,0.00036273338,0.0004108823,0.00014234266,0.0036136403,0.00055166264,0.00015098845,0.00018921163,0.0029738704],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040068426,0.0001285221,0.021881398,0.00001566532,0.0001498073,0.0000042188008,0.00010330827,0.00006192286,0.000003318958,0.97087216,0.0065294965,0.00021010493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018628247,0.00006471619,0.0013232173,0.000031133575,0.000030242332,0.000041575142,0.00077623146,0.00035953004,0.00004655998,0.6356015,0.35930732,0.0005551216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010813528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043168516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9802342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032509636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031248268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270136097","doi":"10.21991/c9wm1m","title":"SECTION 15: EQUALITY? WHERE?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Engineering and Material Science Research","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Computer science; Geometry; Geology; Mathematics; Operating system","score_opus":0.0415559010034558,"score_gpt":0.2761015101784078,"score_spread":0.23454560917495199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270136097","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2023393,0.0009617016,0.519896,0.0017327473,0.014194295,0.0009907503,0.00041687337,0.0013598333,0.2581085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945615,0.000045110985,0.00415772,0.00021325686,0.00025773537,0.000089667155,0.000027419805,0.000011080103,0.000636515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971893,0.00008822488,0.00050133915,0.0005937462,0.00063835416,0.0009890348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987751,0.00006569824,0.000117910226,0.00041274098,0.00027675292,0.000351772],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083203695,0.00029059296,0.00028141538,0.00021808458,0.0010214129,0.00015437446,0.00051317347,0.00019877695,0.0038818496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024137051,0.00026464043,0.00014214497,0.0003985586,0.003609537,0.0010592451,0.0002270789,0.00023151333,0.0017144654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054829663,0.00009871318,0.0021110526,0.000030184705,0.000012580462,0.000017145276,0.00007435552,0.0002997423,0.116512485,0.8775685,0.0028478298,0.00037257743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040265494,0.0006401826,0.0049491744,0.00071424217,0.000121929916,0.0018011298,0.0030705985,0.002108167,0.38423526,0.06427976,0.5309964,0.0030566475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004952188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017761254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81328875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022488732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078404404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270302900","doi":"10.21991/c9dm2n","title":"R. V. HEYWOOD: OVERBREADTH IN THE LAW OR IN THE JUDGMENT?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09085970743381327,"score_gpt":0.3195633263976049,"score_spread":0.2287036189637916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270302900","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010357988,0.00032557355,0.005154677,0.03338862,0.0006380204,0.0016435444,0.00015228053,0.00008884929,0.9482505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99117744,0.00008323736,0.00037158612,0.007553157,0.00013562836,0.0003620032,0.000030304607,0.000004844481,0.0002817869],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99748725,0.00027605848,0.00052372547,0.0003603316,0.00063202786,0.0007206024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988804,0.00037123848,0.00012610026,0.00043609,0.000092068796,0.00009413778],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015473104,0.00020954425,0.00019506236,0.00011667132,0.0020919563,0.00016133614,0.0010653492,0.00015464485,0.00038161012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002589303,0.00012691574,0.00013052272,0.00085154054,0.0064317025,0.000641988,0.00010293756,0.00041804588,0.00021576267],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036213944,0.00027818556,0.008755726,0.0000043182686,0.0000101803,0.000034988298,0.0041107023,0.000037936254,0.0000056544472,0.9841219,0.0023859586,0.00021823135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095390243,0.000043815955,0.0044988287,0.00007187383,0.000024963992,0.000075532414,0.040057994,0.000053817363,0.000023850183,0.11183933,0.842039,0.00031710052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009069208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05995147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98081946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021025626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013376338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271257012","doi":"10.21991/c9qh3s","title":"MARSHALLING THE RULE OF LAW IN CANADA: OF EELS AND HONOUR","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Marshalling; Honour; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.030698061441809744,"score_gpt":0.2435154940380979,"score_spread":0.21281743259628816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271257012","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2839621,0.0053807427,0.0028415043,0.00967689,0.0019052671,0.001108965,0.00050583755,0.000055732977,0.694563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985059,0.00023253789,0.0005194453,0.0005858307,0.0000350227,0.000017151093,0.0000076028555,0.0000027183648,0.00009377394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860704,0.00007449432,0.00039465795,0.00018870454,0.00037214064,0.00036294828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992418,0.0001433577,0.00017256658,0.00014979928,0.0002000696,0.00009237269],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043968717,0.00012538968,0.00022971528,0.00001667048,0.0007804388,0.000012946001,0.00028712026,0.00011920055,0.00017104558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013930534,0.000098649776,0.00008594161,0.00022356497,0.00833403,0.00028099917,0.00008181088,0.00017714458,0.000002842525],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013741085,0.00003655541,0.046063386,0.000015152862,0.000028959514,0.0000040935556,0.0026738194,0.00006364667,0.000059362163,0.9505556,0.00034144762,0.00014419235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033634328,0.00008074997,0.027035454,0.00087726215,0.00018493603,0.000104489285,0.18003123,0.0002644016,0.0038779434,0.39963248,0.38338867,0.001158956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.60140747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.786193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7145438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021855142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004073831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99436474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271726640","doi":"10.21991/c9jq05","title":"STARR TREK: THE UNFINISHED MISSION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Art history; Astrobiology; Physics","score_opus":0.0396551008625046,"score_gpt":0.25604179404513194,"score_spread":0.21638669318262735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271726640","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055758953,0.00035374326,0.15741248,0.009154926,0.0058543407,0.0012046685,0.00046188344,0.00028748583,0.7695115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974015,0.000004985815,0.0006751,0.000669799,0.00034835353,0.000044098455,0.000087659166,0.0000082116185,0.0007603153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978938,0.000063535954,0.0004556465,0.0004630148,0.00040373407,0.0007202833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886674,0.0000910161,0.00017363823,0.00045693942,0.00015442126,0.00025727227],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032057933,0.00030881772,0.00025083078,0.00010973106,0.001641014,0.000120144716,0.0005555503,0.00009116336,0.003173652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058847098,0.00021232512,0.00025658248,0.00039249795,0.0041043013,0.0006682999,0.00014734223,0.00028452722,0.0007285473],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005850118,0.00011089691,0.050229583,0.0000019192626,0.0000498039,0.0000054365064,0.00011247867,0.000115311464,0.0002902046,0.936848,0.01087347,0.0013044114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0044981046,0.0002542415,0.0066159912,0.0002370753,0.00022328393,0.0001279317,0.015233133,0.0017533991,0.011127519,0.3265773,0.63166684,0.0016851777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047973177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031822263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9416425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051381703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011782126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274394536","doi":"10.21991/c9ss9f","title":"PARADIGMS LOST: GERMAN FEDERAL AND ELECTORAL SOLUTIONS TO CANADA'S CONSTITUTIONAL PROBLEMS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"German; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Public administration; History; Sociology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03749095629625165,"score_gpt":0.2682749322109758,"score_spread":0.23078397591472416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2274394536","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046679005,0.0027511131,0.121452555,0.034216672,0.0068764715,0.003412663,0.0028569442,0.0005051219,0.78124946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99406457,0.000037077993,0.00071468175,0.0030739175,0.00032946447,0.00012880513,0.00004992935,0.0000098866085,0.0015916749],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99587876,0.00013774123,0.0006692865,0.0006834774,0.00092647533,0.0017042573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978393,0.00015938454,0.00018166794,0.00029271917,0.0003938268,0.0011331151],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004923306,0.00039600965,0.00043169977,0.00015192358,0.003984117,0.00017381637,0.00042488863,0.00024099757,0.00047449325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005957924,0.0004053381,0.00014198766,0.00045418952,0.011664293,0.00058529305,0.00019874064,0.00033346118,0.000211623],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003057597,0.00009342183,0.029261105,0.000015486798,0.000060158676,0.000037223275,0.0002806848,0.000056281326,0.000046923797,0.95790005,0.011937289,0.00028078994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082928716,0.00006801413,0.008409394,0.00018732276,0.000038023663,0.00023225049,0.00059801695,0.00009076352,0.000061695595,0.0331544,0.9555535,0.00077736087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.539378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7561319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94738555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010621534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01016594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278371041","doi":"10.21991/c9g66n","title":"R.D.S. V. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN: A CASE ABOUT HOME","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Queen (butterfly); Art; Genealogy; Ancient history; Art history; History; Archaeology; Zoology; Biology","score_opus":0.047348726665429136,"score_gpt":0.24300242005912545,"score_spread":0.19565369339369632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278371041","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013710459,0.0034876186,0.004792754,0.012684722,0.0057134903,0.0009894207,0.0004725285,0.00041324183,0.9577358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99175966,0.00027079738,0.00024999984,0.0034997219,0.0005720182,0.00015915677,0.00003075692,0.00001816327,0.0034397254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974724,0.000090483656,0.00065788947,0.00051762135,0.00041675466,0.00084485655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998322,0.00022347723,0.0002768262,0.0005289422,0.00045436047,0.00019435663],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003730073,0.000435813,0.0003796166,0.0001449465,0.005234115,0.00034721097,0.00043332993,0.00012776621,0.0032344824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018374529,0.0002952264,0.00033088177,0.00012255233,0.011774897,0.0009879007,0.00027332775,0.00045495262,0.0012088957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000679445,0.00015901779,0.0021451965,0.000017817772,0.00020652535,0.0006602867,0.002642925,0.000018229139,0.0000020775951,0.9465423,0.04672919,0.00080848765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084262044,0.00011946698,0.00018363062,0.000076927325,0.00014988621,0.003436013,0.02100153,0.0000894842,0.000014960318,0.04459103,0.9289155,0.0005789515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035979748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039013675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9780492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000109047774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047157696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278994497","doi":"10.21991/c92x0w","title":"Searches of Digital Devices Incident to Arrest: R v Fearon","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Warrant; Intrusiveness; Sophistication; Reasonable suspicion; Law enforcement; Officer; Computer security; Expectation of privacy; Search and seizure; Probable cause; Authorization; Internet privacy; Jury; Criminal procedure; Business; Law; Political science; Computer science; Psychology; Supreme court; Sociology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.041434210082615774,"score_gpt":0.30864666154121656,"score_spread":0.2672124514586008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278994497","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11806107,0.00037166162,0.5108542,0.02173456,0.0033058338,0.0015573141,0.0005895333,0.0004264514,0.3430994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99727607,0.000030840667,0.001194661,0.00069536024,0.00033063762,0.000031180345,0.00008284195,0.000008648287,0.00034973482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975591,0.00015303522,0.00047327913,0.00042324816,0.00077282434,0.0006185203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984238,0.00029815783,0.00017592766,0.00030882348,0.00041969237,0.00037360672],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008622895,0.0002124318,0.0002641162,0.0002744615,0.0013839721,0.00021647137,0.0004789582,0.00012428215,0.00013303493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024749187,0.0002136925,0.0001395663,0.000474655,0.004106593,0.0011826073,0.00023891572,0.00020856432,0.00070701947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006577137,0.00008204083,0.012694762,0.00003730149,0.00002446872,0.0000055423075,0.00037479878,0.00038830156,0.00023691298,0.97740245,0.0021718696,0.0065157833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000694083,0.00024033319,0.0031231805,0.0003306174,0.00009018987,0.00003651204,0.013916915,0.00021164498,0.00070740294,0.013429164,0.96664816,0.00057177345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005968403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011674406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9644763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019615599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010329477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279500906","doi":"10.21991/c9c66q","title":"Revisit the Senate as it was meant to be — The Upper House was created to protect provincial interests in the federal legislative process","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; House of Representatives; Political science; Legislative process; Malaise; Law; Selection (genetic algorithm); Lower house; Public administration; Politics; Parliament; Medicine","score_opus":0.051313388239693336,"score_gpt":0.3333419000948967,"score_spread":0.2820285118552034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279500906","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18688841,0.00037934672,0.0066282847,0.56768376,0.0018224489,0.008652023,0.0003613843,0.00025076675,0.22733359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97993314,0.000007959342,0.000049764636,0.017504968,0.00048660222,0.000763137,0.000007659626,0.000013472317,0.0012332896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99559456,0.000603971,0.00064164534,0.0005683976,0.0014080135,0.0011833987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99789095,0.00038754463,0.00019713002,0.0004652949,0.00061271223,0.00044635724],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023725615,0.00036099026,0.00037952204,0.00010633877,0.0029511643,0.0005296287,0.0012355644,0.00018520946,0.000047925118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055778776,0.00019310649,0.00017971796,0.00093182427,0.004361,0.0006314565,0.0002625854,0.00053981104,0.00041379934],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001599703,0.00009643414,0.0031330641,0.000010962458,0.000035508736,0.000030793424,0.01153336,0.00040401117,0.000020982856,0.9676679,0.016729673,0.0001773418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009947615,0.00019030712,0.00097232935,0.0005016105,0.000034762812,0.0001451235,0.028093673,0.00012224425,0.00016831541,0.021854809,0.9463965,0.0005255228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01965352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04614242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94581306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007202802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004548021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99834853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279999816","doi":"10.21991/c9138b","title":"Federalism Still Matters: The Securities Reference Case","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Agency (philosophy); Business; Federalism; Broker-dealer; Constitution; Accounting; Rubric; Law; Political science; Finance; Investment banking","score_opus":0.027303036752140145,"score_gpt":0.2745197194471697,"score_spread":0.24721668269502955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279999816","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029395536,0.0022483214,0.008690542,0.607008,0.003376065,0.0023740493,0.0026144737,0.0004354902,0.34385753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9609572,0.00013358721,0.0001825375,0.032972705,0.00035703133,0.00021466032,0.000033135635,0.000008281153,0.00514085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974879,0.00015372409,0.00042410236,0.00039928232,0.00054529466,0.0009896834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983556,0.0003483488,0.00017823942,0.0003756291,0.0003582116,0.00038393837],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034912198,0.00027173737,0.00023274038,0.00011353059,0.0044087004,0.00055222836,0.00050736964,0.00020472257,0.0020375384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046770845,0.00022686482,0.00015845684,0.0003402075,0.01197192,0.0012620366,0.00012410551,0.0003679538,0.0011274511],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048290817,0.000019752213,0.00039696883,0.000006456502,0.000024283143,0.00011579872,0.0006533943,0.00003854709,0.000010565797,0.7643028,0.23392181,0.0005047729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003813252,0.000013931268,0.00027353663,0.000078114914,0.000021136584,0.0012969375,0.0063270577,0.00007470078,0.000020936564,0.05170892,0.9394584,0.00034505175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11990099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07907896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93156165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038475185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021645757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282543069","doi":"10.21991/c9009c","title":"BCGSEU: TURNING A PAGE IN CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS LAW","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.043553941281185574,"score_gpt":0.29173936810177226,"score_spread":0.2481854268205867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282543069","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0553999,0.0005253168,0.00050042255,0.003596912,0.0016138449,0.00096293824,0.0001445623,0.00025641624,0.9369997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99751127,0.000015675187,0.0006980543,0.0007832663,0.0001866306,0.00011418525,0.000058633457,0.000008633541,0.0006236797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964534,0.00018118556,0.0005887642,0.0005612118,0.0005715829,0.0016438799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844605,0.00011663358,0.00015128317,0.0002461615,0.0003093424,0.00073054683],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068821764,0.00035782484,0.00039782436,0.00027864354,0.009296412,0.00013318629,0.0005210003,0.0003335471,0.0011597322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031769602,0.0003356616,0.00020716955,0.0005375361,0.011095793,0.0010549254,0.00012683372,0.00046103014,0.00042575615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011462591,0.00007130979,0.050291974,0.0000059667373,0.00004636176,0.00009733312,0.0030824586,0.00002316203,0.000046078858,0.94504213,0.0012224071,0.000059379072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013695088,0.000046202847,0.009544146,0.00023429503,0.000049684615,0.00004060082,0.0092404345,0.00004272815,0.00017004913,0.08079977,0.89751536,0.0009472257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85720843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97752756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9421113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016332293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013050641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282792187","doi":"10.21991/c9q08h","title":"THE POST-CRITICAL FUTURE OF LEGAL THEORY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Political science; Computer science; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017374971338332195,"score_gpt":0.2732937102068024,"score_spread":0.25591873886847016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282792187","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023468079,0.007703394,0.013222898,0.032428607,0.0079689715,0.00070297567,0.00031870313,0.00025897735,0.93504864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948761,0.00051003986,0.00093716756,0.0014043762,0.00054374326,0.000045846453,0.000023399358,0.0000066462376,0.0016526901],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975657,0.0002557445,0.00047090912,0.00031390076,0.0006524936,0.0007412729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99799883,0.00048892153,0.00014600874,0.00032183918,0.0008082884,0.00023612418],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011056658,0.00021934202,0.00023990557,0.000023515155,0.005064215,0.00009443175,0.0006587599,0.0003193468,0.00074132666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011135658,0.00015761824,0.0003648205,0.00034258928,0.028268756,0.0007079464,0.00012498186,0.00037515585,0.00011720155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009918614,0.00010888439,0.001599999,0.000009398021,0.00007112314,0.000010473319,0.0017888234,0.000003153532,0.000051402556,0.98718166,0.0074968515,0.0015790135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003320587,0.000042682295,0.00026586375,0.00004562408,0.0000527007,0.000050912106,0.04645298,0.0000044643707,0.00017909081,0.24141298,0.71092635,0.0002342647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022174799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007270213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9925293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012486064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002208488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283390812","doi":"10.21991/c9p086","title":"SOME DRAWBACKS OF THE POLITICS OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law and economics; Human rights; Constitutional economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.022393493055971218,"score_gpt":0.27631955794012036,"score_spread":0.25392606488414915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283390812","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017970316,0.0019565457,0.027645444,0.003293884,0.0058047744,0.0012494668,0.0021856676,0.00018262601,0.9397113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951584,0.00006640137,0.001879617,0.0008090186,0.00038788604,0.000035531437,0.000044055454,0.000007951969,0.0016111725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959267,0.00026341013,0.0011432363,0.0004599002,0.0012119053,0.0009948643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99684036,0.0004052015,0.0006754263,0.000608299,0.0010819731,0.00038875794],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056197547,0.00038515532,0.00058304955,0.00026485545,0.0030965805,0.000029947872,0.0010232171,0.00033333732,0.0007775103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007634615,0.00031972796,0.0005631064,0.00068512297,0.09819619,0.0007771293,0.00026589422,0.00038419294,0.00007124645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037787166,0.00028065772,0.021867221,0.000026064326,0.00013542768,0.000008076661,0.0003584579,0.00009124134,0.00011972789,0.97476447,0.0022610873,0.000049801936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012654407,0.00008593625,0.0014857295,0.000326282,0.00021206566,0.00014267428,0.0027657,0.000025473248,0.0035803956,0.39283863,0.5966039,0.0006678228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030051672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004345207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97718805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033650792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014344596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283628236","doi":"10.21991/c9z660","title":"AUCTIONEERS, FENCE-VIEWERS, POPES – AND JUDGES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Literary, Cultural, Historical Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fence (mathematics); Advertising; Art; Visual arts; History; Engineering; Business; Structural engineering","score_opus":0.041588139374570725,"score_gpt":0.20091944137368214,"score_spread":0.1593313019991114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283628236","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013215471,0.009710511,0.011915165,0.00834115,0.0071288827,0.00095785136,0.00065496075,0.00085557514,0.94722044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894045,0.00015429425,0.00097242737,0.0014728984,0.00042722205,0.00007269031,0.00016940685,0.00001228633,0.0073142583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779695,0.00005515682,0.000577139,0.0005863924,0.000399593,0.0005847544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987297,0.0000659722,0.0001851477,0.00031573186,0.00042222737,0.00028121946],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001739281,0.00039041816,0.00041360199,0.0002807676,0.0022597457,0.00022078874,0.000295044,0.00012567849,0.0043842057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015932045,0.0003219732,0.00025597727,0.00017409956,0.00815924,0.0015163579,0.00015502374,0.000253929,0.00047368614],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003354348,0.00010697946,0.007758806,0.000018866158,0.00015683968,0.000018623108,0.0019281489,0.0000060906764,0.000029691731,0.95858866,0.030549705,0.00080406637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064917275,0.000078345256,0.0003376854,0.00007844874,0.000194721,0.00016701869,0.0055503,0.00012775403,0.00006849776,0.036943365,0.95519054,0.00061415124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050383963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052980037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.976189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020395262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028053005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W22851507","doi":"10.21991/c96x04","title":"Canadian Federalism in the Context of Combating Climate Change","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Jurisdiction; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Political science; Diversity (politics); Climate change; Public administration; Population; Cooperative federalism; Environmental planning; Geography; Law; Sociology; Ecology","score_opus":0.06104873466404512,"score_gpt":0.2811990999720207,"score_spread":0.22015036530797558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W22851507","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043944377,0.0014164136,0.0006364276,0.090115696,0.0022440606,0.0021240853,0.003481845,0.00008657542,0.85595053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98694843,0.00013166436,0.000115583935,0.012452005,0.00013568393,0.00009148869,0.000025047475,0.000004682767,0.00009539662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790585,0.00014878272,0.00041879655,0.00024480774,0.00037862489,0.0009031633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900925,0.00015157039,0.00018129869,0.00022858063,0.00015634391,0.00027296194],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007747418,0.00017004773,0.00022661728,0.00023322276,0.001703548,0.000057482674,0.00050289556,0.00016086004,0.00022990993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041508125,0.00015503875,0.00012385243,0.00048475465,0.0045705335,0.00055520795,0.000042742664,0.00022788064,0.00006631837],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000127530575,0.000034100445,0.046058774,0.0000077232735,0.000009839384,0.000030947096,0.0070325653,0.0000021739445,0.0000025126228,0.94164234,0.004106393,0.0010598552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015563805,0.00006837563,0.030358557,0.00041900194,0.000039540828,0.00011212155,0.050740644,0.00008783861,0.00006670737,0.049886215,0.86597824,0.0006863522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8782298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9741633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9430041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045635205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029011238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2285245633","doi":"10.21991/c9208m","title":"A MOST POLITIC JUDGEMENT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Social Science and Policy Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; Body politic; Political science; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.09800574020272736,"score_gpt":0.3621257563324283,"score_spread":0.26412001612970093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2285245633","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0071965996,0.000291514,0.008428185,0.011052811,0.001930421,0.00075998314,0.0001282289,0.00028645966,0.9699258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99297476,0.000110744215,0.0006025433,0.0031326737,0.00040532023,0.00011607243,0.000028145718,0.000007389559,0.002622351],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964402,0.00017675072,0.0004160306,0.0004628231,0.0010173004,0.0014868974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982682,0.00015707493,0.0001110881,0.00030224439,0.00052535796,0.0006360535],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009081418,0.00023267847,0.0002438812,0.000275087,0.0039938223,0.00014450111,0.00069932814,0.00021567752,0.0031732123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010844207,0.00023290853,0.00016289309,0.0011256373,0.0145801045,0.00088743697,0.0001807689,0.0002713998,0.0015020006],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021084375,0.000117224015,0.023307594,0.0000045093125,0.00003137836,0.000019647785,0.001494436,0.0000070615984,0.000034076245,0.9602536,0.0131753385,0.001534083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007714915,0.00007258281,0.0020089238,0.00006151208,0.00003471892,0.00003358736,0.017585788,0.00004753836,0.00021126647,0.15372454,0.82490736,0.0005407033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009454935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032148184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98577815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004972242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005476238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99927545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2285386614","doi":"10.21991/c9zd3x","title":"DISHONOURABLE CONDUCT: THE CROWN IN RIGHT OF CANADA AND QUEBEC, AND THE JAMES BAY CREE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bay; Crown (dentistry); Geography; Political science; Archaeology; Medicine","score_opus":0.014753040351762356,"score_gpt":0.20456465358075182,"score_spread":0.18981161322898946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2285386614","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16453998,0.016741797,0.0015111173,0.0730106,0.004027759,0.0022600533,0.00071052386,0.00008066314,0.7371175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954491,0.0002702364,0.000049715025,0.00079633354,0.000044584947,0.000034323086,0.0000059629456,0.0000031053664,0.0033466276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855524,0.00014262639,0.00033195986,0.0002321726,0.00031733073,0.00042068816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999063,0.00031285718,0.00013106807,0.00019552399,0.00013894273,0.00015857645],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006850967,0.00013039005,0.00023469797,0.00016176069,0.0029318677,0.00014405091,0.00028189935,0.00009335561,0.00056989136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051178556,0.00009859171,0.00005588923,0.0002796402,0.030451499,0.00042819214,0.00008388763,0.00020807686,0.000004465689],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053003616,0.00001725814,0.008966173,0.000008703609,0.000025415455,0.000012557931,0.0015286177,0.000009609685,0.000003918838,0.97300065,0.016135532,0.0002385836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014865489,0.000010496907,0.009420331,0.0000811855,0.000047420333,0.0000538668,0.012833431,0.000039740076,0.000020726311,0.034343872,0.94141287,0.00024952317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9906521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93865675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045776542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0096572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2288065579","doi":"10.21991/c9s94q","title":"SYMPOSIUM REPORT: AFTER ALLAIRE AND BELANGER-CAMPEAU","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Linguistic Variation and Morphology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Cartography; Geography","score_opus":0.025806703176138243,"score_gpt":0.2708752864471211,"score_spread":0.24506858327098285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2288065579","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006972769,0.0007814182,0.029712707,0.0091811605,0.007346075,0.0007621118,0.00015741862,0.00040447016,0.9446819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928055,0.00011211131,0.0023687205,0.0018868435,0.0004490627,0.00010471477,0.00006380824,0.00000905987,0.0022002077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780875,0.00011271197,0.00049665227,0.00051896536,0.00039943686,0.0006634916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985607,0.00010628499,0.000191047,0.00029529695,0.0004808596,0.00036579647],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057820417,0.00023798375,0.00026380087,0.00018088782,0.0015501359,0.0000771296,0.00021939233,0.0002808969,0.0014741773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014559563,0.0002398642,0.00012374195,0.00022311027,0.007105443,0.0002890722,0.00014327787,0.00020886357,0.0002593541],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050771712,0.00007621051,0.052718375,0.000007252528,0.00004770363,0.0003584453,0.0011305222,0.0000027766343,0.00002519177,0.9413881,0.003964018,0.00023063722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008796959,0.000045333505,0.005189378,0.00006533821,0.000087424116,0.0006620366,0.002906523,0.00002611589,0.00005696719,0.0425612,0.94702756,0.00049241196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011287119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015738633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9858327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016281409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015831648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2291903386","doi":"10.21991/c9fm2z","title":"The Speaker’s Ruling on Afghan Detainee Documents: The Last Hurrah for Parliamentary Privilege?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; House of Commons; Privilege (computing); Afghan; Law; Servant; History; Political science; Philosophy; Parliament; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.023621247166980594,"score_gpt":0.30320217532809596,"score_spread":0.27958092816111535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2291903386","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009600385,0.007895144,0.11663315,0.093474045,0.017904855,0.0052232277,0.0015367531,0.00057260337,0.74715984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879889,0.00039909105,0.000648942,0.006571736,0.0019560093,0.00045100364,0.0001351548,0.000017769573,0.0018313953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957334,0.00026151977,0.0006855618,0.00044025827,0.00099181,0.0018874649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960366,0.0022139212,0.00031314095,0.0005240803,0.0003997289,0.0005125441],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016536214,0.0004304046,0.0003268446,0.0001123563,0.011993326,0.0003352558,0.00085474807,0.00019364375,0.00019482392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013841756,0.00029339956,0.0004025624,0.00039824692,0.017981386,0.00093517685,0.00017383497,0.00042764287,0.00031214213],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007360969,0.00013608317,0.0104939155,0.0000074993727,0.00013554163,0.0000023967764,0.00020260301,0.0002121375,0.00001392461,0.9555421,0.031663932,0.00151628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073340506,0.000062374194,0.00027227463,0.000082628176,0.00009707772,0.000045720317,0.009311167,0.000040207884,0.00007002158,0.013612473,0.97525084,0.00042181395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00054470083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016679621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9783885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070743595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041139163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2292747333","doi":"10.21991/c9ht0w","title":"COMMENTS: NOW WHAT?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.06318094613874002,"score_gpt":0.3042156436677809,"score_spread":0.2410346975290409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2292747333","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009892607,0.0031479108,0.033178523,0.016198989,0.005527165,0.00086678617,0.00013033093,0.0004872897,0.9305704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916644,0.00087276014,0.0011212783,0.0047181086,0.00021765303,0.00006910091,0.00004070011,0.000008843955,0.0012871159],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973639,0.00013011726,0.00047411793,0.0004203439,0.0006105348,0.0010009576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986015,0.00015136832,0.00016028248,0.0003281164,0.0003508074,0.0004079563],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000488563,0.00029857183,0.00031479276,0.00019662787,0.0033985744,0.00025704535,0.0004412896,0.00019284453,0.001651395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038982925,0.0002936241,0.0002286629,0.00040972652,0.009935819,0.0027608953,0.00018595936,0.00022760166,0.001429649],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004297329,0.00018516571,0.03974142,0.0000062767117,0.000086850574,0.000022325812,0.0027335563,0.0000068949844,0.000009027242,0.93923104,0.01518646,0.0027480256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014819396,0.00009766222,0.0038749457,0.00024605796,0.00008370597,0.000058199206,0.0753399,0.000015394688,0.00015530102,0.06890716,0.84901166,0.00072809024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00058530713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021657664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9817718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020192392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013225967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293311790","doi":"10.21991/c9x371","title":"SHARPE’S PERVERSE AESTHETIC","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Political Science Association; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Supreme court; Charter; Law; Pornography; Section (typography); Criminal code; Child pornography; Psychology; Political science; Criminal law; Sociology; The Internet; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.042270064181060656,"score_gpt":0.27242083274394674,"score_spread":0.23015076856288608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293311790","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0051630996,0.0012640483,0.009962264,0.007788218,0.0030287479,0.00069237844,0.00016568424,0.0005607419,0.9713748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908412,0.00029951308,0.0021043797,0.0022769845,0.00021822272,0.0000849762,0.000057657373,0.000010507659,0.004106526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973127,0.00013088409,0.00042158313,0.0005065317,0.0006813132,0.00094696996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865055,0.000049316186,0.00015094549,0.00034408103,0.00039149605,0.00041363284],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005192411,0.0002979659,0.00027554316,0.000044836226,0.0038283335,0.00010862688,0.0005988748,0.00038750778,0.0042285547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024820789,0.00028578716,0.00037897253,0.00047140708,0.013112273,0.00095946784,0.00013043187,0.00036044035,0.0013558681],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026963935,0.00015693817,0.007031475,0.0000064888427,0.000037333724,0.00003167209,0.0030234929,0.000017664952,0.000019963834,0.9642129,0.024631416,0.00080367574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008122982,0.000039370545,0.0002903474,0.00008005366,0.000059593393,0.00013760125,0.022037761,0.000026497619,0.000084608255,0.0825569,0.8933529,0.00052204536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059201993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00093285425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98567814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003128796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019057317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293389147","doi":"10.21991/c9g370","title":"R. V. SHARPE AND THE PRIVATE POSSESSION OF CHILD PORNOGRAPHY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Pornography; Child pornography; Psychology; Political science; Law; The Internet; Computer science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03231158084439569,"score_gpt":0.28934889142078135,"score_spread":0.2570373105763857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293389147","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2494281,0.0077710846,0.035636045,0.0096393945,0.0062602777,0.0023761385,0.00062412146,0.00068084727,0.687584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99769205,0.000074421485,0.0005985203,0.0010837914,0.000058930033,0.00014465791,0.000059962615,0.000012452477,0.00027520978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99765474,0.00013518904,0.00073168374,0.00056656386,0.00029675502,0.0006150583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844337,0.00016143294,0.00034371944,0.00071310654,0.0001969581,0.00014142349],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005033527,0.00033609473,0.00047553488,0.0003749221,0.0008833954,0.000025052394,0.0005087543,0.0003584643,0.0007957615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016323557,0.00024525603,0.00023876048,0.00050064555,0.01882603,0.00026490988,0.00028196338,0.00043367982,0.000089136396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000454798,0.00028359526,0.10329552,0.000010723793,0.00015213246,0.000027018956,0.00029759947,8.731088e-7,0.0000738396,0.8923565,0.0012042397,0.0018431563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02707449,0.0008991983,0.17421213,0.0006245815,0.00094174506,0.007228636,0.013976673,0.00009718515,0.0035388987,0.4355598,0.33367673,0.0021699225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026199396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000044817145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74826396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030810534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000177573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2295034130","doi":"10.21991/c9v662","title":"AUDITOR GENERAL LOSES BATTLE AGAINST FEDERAL CABINET","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Battle; Audit; Business; Accounting; Engineering; History; Ancient history; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.03517059634072468,"score_gpt":0.2765402653373687,"score_spread":0.24136966899664403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2295034130","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03294846,0.0011782788,0.02162206,0.009407,0.012834817,0.0008999156,0.0005317791,0.00054373516,0.92003393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990683,0.0001644728,0.002714523,0.0010848991,0.0014080454,0.0000894477,0.00012622835,0.000013099993,0.0037162723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971737,0.000118201744,0.0005231316,0.0005242767,0.00064693147,0.0010137027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985064,0.00014220034,0.00017681741,0.00030654258,0.0004722942,0.0003957135],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033535325,0.00033438424,0.00034126444,0.00018979025,0.0055709346,0.00014369807,0.00037510984,0.00025444504,0.0012191377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005089491,0.00031272112,0.0003025466,0.0004453308,0.010074285,0.0008315262,0.00018537068,0.00026794194,0.0004846134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032735752,0.00013657063,0.014635877,0.000007087823,0.00009185691,0.000039763825,0.00061377574,0.00023969573,0.000054194195,0.93724096,0.046309706,0.0005977895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011983402,0.000064813714,0.0033217533,0.00007707605,0.00006221281,0.000058373447,0.00650356,0.00020163122,0.00016607433,0.013610463,0.97399426,0.0007414285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016882588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003261844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9577345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038366506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021398927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296379627","doi":"10.21991/c9836r","title":"HARM REVISITED: R. V. BUTLER","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Do no harm; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy; Psychology; Criminology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07145907377720968,"score_gpt":0.21927267654045665,"score_spread":0.14781360276324695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2296379627","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011288965,0.0026775803,0.03367526,0.0007121648,0.005287311,0.0003685784,0.0018257337,0.00018582754,0.95413864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96244246,0.00019282728,0.0023294943,0.001452646,0.00014021009,0.00006746226,0.00008671829,0.000014273287,0.033273894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743265,0.000012251213,0.0008979923,0.0008235312,0.00008609862,0.0007474912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875855,0.000039302708,0.00034877114,0.0005020925,0.00012304507,0.00022820676],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048435075,0.00032282484,0.00053557864,0.00037849683,0.00089888286,0.00010235897,0.0004499444,0.00016253619,0.022974096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023093002,0.0003615582,0.00031072914,0.00034071947,0.003478241,0.000839714,0.0002549327,0.00020732541,0.046262126],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022677943,0.00009659292,0.02737539,0.00001041659,0.00011740012,0.000013094233,0.00012950963,0.000018778414,0.000005511592,0.8473926,0.12468908,0.0001289348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010543125,0.000035810812,0.0016151866,0.000049594113,0.000023666436,0.00008206963,0.0010928119,0.00025408342,0.00009808098,0.11295956,0.8821266,0.0006081838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013913836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010844181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9613136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020860026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017860645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296797358","doi":"10.21991/c9km26","title":"SHAPING WHAT FUTURE FOR CANADA? A PROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT'S CONSTITUTIONAL PROPOSALS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.02593176546982789,"score_gpt":0.2604788609536741,"score_spread":0.23454709548384622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2296797358","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09110444,0.006682198,0.30481738,0.053172015,0.032668542,0.013827977,0.018772,0.00045778992,0.47849765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99684024,0.00005226368,0.0006276027,0.0012835399,0.000330509,0.00022205818,0.000033318014,0.000006478015,0.000603984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963105,0.00012900755,0.0007231976,0.0005284246,0.0013969527,0.00091197004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802905,0.0002449909,0.0004527162,0.00034799072,0.0006346811,0.00029056382],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005589763,0.0003068063,0.0005499259,0.00008467584,0.0028738305,0.00013283256,0.0006057664,0.0002171438,0.00026098592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079582975,0.00024330014,0.0005373682,0.0009055061,0.011639829,0.0010282212,0.00014574552,0.00022182234,0.000005402159],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006816648,0.00009881812,0.1220229,0.00001948906,0.000621591,0.0000037581992,0.00030458692,0.0000964828,0.00003151989,0.8744376,0.0020917603,0.00020338497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003528998,0.00013393164,0.106099494,0.0008694308,0.0018597826,0.000078378805,0.031336863,0.0009782602,0.0015466439,0.07433605,0.77745503,0.0017771263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14325455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47513348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9057358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001517031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00963434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299663598","doi":"10.21991/c9m95j","title":"Confidence: How Much is Enough?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; House of Commons; Constitution; Prime minister; Government (linguistics); Law; Political science; Governor; Subject (documents); Subject matter; Rank (graph theory); Politics; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.08626092042084935,"score_gpt":0.3115656140083177,"score_spread":0.22530469358746838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299663598","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0064697764,0.0008094014,0.0561956,0.07688525,0.005077127,0.0012948075,0.0007475576,0.0005468073,0.85197365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98746705,0.0001930905,0.0012663503,0.0044863843,0.00038613664,0.00007222795,0.00005318021,0.000013606042,0.0060619973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964402,0.00014871702,0.00052012154,0.00062679587,0.00082470395,0.0014395161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978669,0.00014785305,0.00023605028,0.00049137993,0.000568447,0.00068935234],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005790108,0.00037887966,0.00039882006,0.00025020476,0.0038615316,0.0002936295,0.0007011219,0.00039042908,0.0030975856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004063292,0.00039985494,0.00030735988,0.00043829787,0.011095598,0.0010203278,0.00015206331,0.0004299348,0.0006185248],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024024072,0.00011540111,0.005444309,0.00001258915,0.000056815774,0.00004056594,0.002280137,0.0000014390268,0.000021810682,0.9466926,0.044998094,0.00031224432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074460736,0.000052404812,0.0005425792,0.000082115126,0.00004853899,0.00008747538,0.013380087,0.000033477278,0.0004411721,0.34798074,0.6360291,0.0005776495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004052937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016208211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98099726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036844416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034360902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2300180147","doi":"10.21991/c92946","title":"ISRAEL USHERS IN A CONSTITUTIONAL REVOLUTION: THE ISRAELI EXPERIENCE, THE CANADIAN IMPACT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.05640675291215899,"score_gpt":0.29988215736807483,"score_spread":0.24347540445591584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2300180147","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029620402,0.007519318,0.008225753,0.01770385,0.006488371,0.0022903353,0.0005365334,0.00024472206,0.9273707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99580824,0.00015379128,0.00017708562,0.002565992,0.00032954992,0.00030314055,0.000039102175,0.000008848249,0.0006142321],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995886,0.00030986595,0.00070038624,0.00059376075,0.00090379966,0.0016061612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978798,0.0003352322,0.00020967465,0.0005345145,0.0005061841,0.00053461094],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012247815,0.0004315076,0.00036754215,0.00035662446,0.008510145,0.00023721534,0.0010564951,0.00029492652,0.0004469517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010804839,0.00028864393,0.00036106666,0.0011680142,0.045082174,0.0010080718,0.00019070528,0.00061606505,0.00064173766],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031305048,0.0000545562,0.27222186,0.0000025431905,0.00006169125,0.000032335225,0.0017765645,0.00006665726,0.000002941081,0.7226748,0.0025117975,0.000562978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018205106,0.00008295388,0.056511186,0.00023899472,0.00009746885,0.00041624327,0.10362887,0.00018447534,0.0000203426,0.04916561,0.78675944,0.0010739395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2866036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7753307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96618783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015449878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010313039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2300602183","doi":"10.21991/c9dh30","title":"CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM: DOES ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY FIT IN?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economics; Law and economics","score_opus":0.044482203030079895,"score_gpt":0.2805532558043787,"score_spread":0.2360710527742988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2300602183","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03704105,0.0002557348,0.017494634,0.0033032494,0.007049846,0.0009384375,0.00024537861,0.0003400142,0.93333167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953051,0.00020351478,0.0015571101,0.00092328386,0.00021048558,0.00015056395,0.00006602564,0.0000080379195,0.0015758594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99651325,0.000109446286,0.0009997294,0.00076550676,0.0004241054,0.0011879494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986585,0.000103864295,0.0002569472,0.00036525622,0.00017152185,0.000443914],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010015486,0.0003900772,0.00044048278,0.00041364646,0.0019735876,0.00012636001,0.00063574343,0.00031367876,0.006645136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019778316,0.00036556675,0.0002448971,0.00035822272,0.01483742,0.0012477823,0.00020392112,0.00034934146,0.0024241058],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006882561,0.00018879857,0.056705832,0.000007208834,0.00003539041,0.00003049673,0.00079979183,0.00021536878,0.000009879106,0.93870234,0.00041140875,0.00282467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039709113,0.0000818857,0.009524582,0.00027091475,0.000044739994,0.00020843245,0.025115466,0.0007131857,0.00018750071,0.048606656,0.90945745,0.0018182598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003012041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010426498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95826405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002937978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005306602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2303853164","doi":"10.21991/c96d5v","title":"CULTURES, LANGUAGES, NATIONS: CONCEPTIONS AND MISCONCEPTIONS*","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; State (computer science); Ideal (ethics); Nation state; Globalization; Monopoly; Political science; Political economy; Immigration; Law; Sociology; Politics; Economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.033022364434418985,"score_gpt":0.30705642282833123,"score_spread":0.27403405839391226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2303853164","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063658846,0.0039348984,0.030474732,0.006016638,0.0013574734,0.0008626117,0.0006621464,0.00036923133,0.94995636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99231285,0.00034902152,0.001760378,0.0010555423,0.00027154296,0.00011976479,0.00005348177,0.0000069892685,0.004070415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978879,0.00012396583,0.00041611056,0.00041337244,0.00045775977,0.00070087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998767,0.00017029785,0.00014681577,0.00022488929,0.00028805182,0.00040290816],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033004684,0.00022404685,0.00024164768,0.00014649027,0.0029718832,0.00010957787,0.00027177966,0.0002237627,0.0009839177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00093008863,0.0002157741,0.00012786989,0.00038310257,0.0100118155,0.0008002453,0.000089422705,0.00022105503,0.00028755824],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009207188,0.00007673303,0.0106980875,0.000008414775,0.000033889537,0.000012471315,0.0009312604,0.0000044220956,0.00004076251,0.9820365,0.0056410977,0.0005072119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071764906,0.000030074116,0.003869719,0.00014092466,0.00004208408,0.00009243657,0.009871584,0.000022450802,0.000050341787,0.041391883,0.94334644,0.00042440207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070858593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006760786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98594695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023605378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001069489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2305552948","doi":"10.21991/c90w9b","title":"RIGHTS, RECOGNITION, AND RECTIFICATION: CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES IN JOHNSON V. SAND","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Rectification; Constitutional law; Law; Political science; Physics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.06385283455441237,"score_gpt":0.27573461441026664,"score_spread":0.21188177985585427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2305552948","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024007991,0.0058599007,0.026173241,0.006746592,0.004319247,0.0016980986,0.0004115161,0.00045966968,0.9303237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996795,0.0005535173,0.0011939358,0.00049600675,0.00036605037,0.00015010384,0.00010136265,0.000006901646,0.0003370973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970111,0.00019165593,0.0007743221,0.00065268826,0.00061443355,0.0007558004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835676,0.00021997304,0.00025067208,0.00022273099,0.0006154539,0.00033442318],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009799189,0.00031600147,0.00040284192,0.0004115646,0.002762069,0.00014884498,0.00028518558,0.0003351884,0.00076929166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009257776,0.00031515965,0.00011065664,0.000734948,0.018893208,0.001478885,0.000090783076,0.0003470656,0.00027889886],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007877353,0.0001371102,0.023946168,0.000024213998,0.0000386699,0.00003156361,0.0011147977,0.0000054610055,0.00006340436,0.96972024,0.0034957633,0.0013438144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018053262,0.000075988464,0.003213662,0.0005506207,0.00006566853,0.00022492974,0.0053742947,0.000021915435,0.000664997,0.34431383,0.6428074,0.00088130275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008911543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010014151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.972787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003250816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022911637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2311717106","doi":"10.21991/c9j668","title":"THE AFTERMATH OF MEECH LAKE: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE WESTERN ECONOMY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economy; Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.08623139865255162,"score_gpt":0.23487976149012735,"score_spread":0.1486483628375757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2311717106","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0070042443,0.0109159695,0.5280832,0.040239062,0.0045067538,0.003260489,0.007947407,0.00019304502,0.39784983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99648994,0.0003384515,0.00091035635,0.0012279875,0.000100105375,0.00044374776,0.000070581125,0.000012632589,0.00040618388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979173,0.000011142305,0.0010381191,0.00041726232,0.00003404878,0.00058212434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99818975,0.00033573396,0.00053437194,0.00067058654,0.00015172144,0.00011781528],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005256297,0.00024735494,0.00037193,0.000110810426,0.0014187513,0.00010369783,0.00077335164,0.00013966234,0.0000964847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016972212,0.0001960067,0.00035869677,0.00017729269,0.0031399599,0.00050347846,0.00013924592,0.00015556629,0.00027312545],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038136168,0.00006258374,0.09175602,0.000012288208,0.00014778897,3.3222986e-7,0.000048034202,0.00010704834,0.0000034789427,0.9022184,0.005256255,0.00034961663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073564914,0.0000424855,0.019532304,0.00001714113,0.000032410717,0.000059602833,0.00022842275,0.00040159893,0.000065228494,0.32297477,0.655648,0.00026235386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000072544404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041626423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9894857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001036556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028666997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340704067","doi":"10.21991/c91m27","title":"OLDMAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT: AN INVITATION FOR COOPERATIVE FEDERALISM","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Cooperative federalism; Environmental impact assessment; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.027136319755283404,"score_gpt":0.29656275386987574,"score_spread":0.26942643411459233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2340704067","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85709363,0.00012413895,0.106283836,0.00076491944,0.00071709306,0.0019676767,0.0015507826,0.00015319398,0.031344738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903852,0.000032612945,0.0070235254,0.0011338326,0.00005762742,0.00019191345,0.00092690653,0.00001887487,0.00022951177],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780834,0.00009093186,0.00042656309,0.00061854813,0.00040074572,0.0006548937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906933,0.00006877734,0.0001741783,0.00024599864,0.000015140298,0.00042655168],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025890095,0.00040396384,0.0003046975,0.00007813116,0.0016740453,0.00010902825,0.00023102533,0.00018403097,0.0016315347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037613256,0.0003729006,0.00016397782,0.00012231394,0.0044301697,0.0019966592,0.00022288028,0.00020065172,0.00013283001],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015280944,0.00085854804,0.49853483,0.0000101168025,0.00015436318,0.000015877982,0.0010038796,0.0008510814,0.011357193,0.48171327,0.0024041273,0.0029439144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009915856,0.0028633547,0.83786166,0.00011577869,0.0003725725,0.0005243285,0.015024951,0.013684135,0.0033607061,0.08151787,0.0315659,0.0031928862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029289993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014448744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4001954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007186298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014383564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344545063","doi":"10.21991/c93q1h","title":"Penser le Canada dans un monde désenchanté : réflexions sur le fédéralisme, le nationalisme et la différence autochtone","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01439108694950075,"score_gpt":0.227652992891085,"score_spread":0.21326190594158426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344545063","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0071948846,0.0077022538,0.06268582,0.56049156,0.010590039,0.001035237,0.00816858,0.00028671048,0.34184492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.920702,0.0008024764,0.00048437502,0.0040961006,0.00035592687,0.00012359828,0.00021056131,0.000028282631,0.0731967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947668,0.00054829434,0.0009116907,0.0009915801,0.0013300818,0.0014515546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996645,0.0007541232,0.0004196312,0.0005445179,0.0007563525,0.00088038406],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008388356,0.00055049406,0.00058257027,0.0005341322,0.00697963,0.0004592041,0.0008472175,0.0005234951,0.001343186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00087620306,0.00063875393,0.0003998166,0.0009540085,0.02639571,0.0023550752,0.00027027758,0.00051507604,0.00033418759],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026663707,0.00031733172,0.00067099114,0.000028467584,0.00015209234,0.00017689145,0.00045202023,0.0004674869,0.00057546404,0.9107916,0.08497808,0.0013629516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019700837,0.000026286712,0.0014240657,0.0003940508,0.000081066406,0.00034899538,0.0021801093,0.00015203911,0.00013432646,0.07426504,0.91814166,0.0008822443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96658933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9940688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9135071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003149775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.103945024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344958328","doi":"10.21991/c90109","title":"Envisaging Canada in a Disenchanted World: Reflections on Federalism, Nationalism, and Distinctive Indigenous Identity","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Nationalism; Federalism; Indigenous; Identity (music); Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Politics; Art; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.020232931162352624,"score_gpt":0.2829396780795774,"score_spread":0.26270674691722473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344958328","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19538112,0.0024951224,0.04060861,0.12572724,0.011893961,0.0033660005,0.0048371,0.00057886005,0.615112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934709,0.00012811886,0.000070575334,0.0014463922,0.00015989652,0.000077651304,0.000039884526,0.000007566411,0.004598998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976397,0.00013681581,0.00038864865,0.0004852253,0.0006852832,0.0006643409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987881,0.0003577232,0.00013945648,0.00017269817,0.00020088551,0.00034111843],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037081697,0.00020034652,0.0002357985,0.0010481318,0.004709489,0.00031683172,0.00022809839,0.000109897235,0.000388519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007552543,0.00021212077,0.00007975164,0.0008002436,0.00595804,0.0010472884,0.00007331105,0.00021742767,0.000048599657],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030660358,0.000056369965,0.015394917,0.000005950575,0.000027291439,0.000054078533,0.0006062262,0.000035245685,0.00003592945,0.97878456,0.0040701507,0.0008986108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011924842,0.000022676764,0.015276652,0.0002974186,0.000026324753,0.00004441446,0.0029814462,0.000010745605,0.00001347671,0.041860983,0.937758,0.00051534566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8679776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93692356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004339136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010669624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99948305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2361072528","doi":"10.21991/c9v67f","title":"Comparing Canadian and Colombian Approaches to the Duty to Consult Indigenous Communities on International Treaties","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Duty; Political science; International law; Geography; International trade; Law; Business; Ecology","score_opus":0.09881601237805424,"score_gpt":0.2712490961845066,"score_spread":0.17243308380645236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2361072528","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37660122,0.00008239739,0.0054067764,0.16742788,0.0030163047,0.0016392015,0.0011246596,0.00016863158,0.44453293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907315,0.000015795327,0.00021627142,0.004297548,0.00026714226,0.0001546545,0.000059898513,0.000007967324,0.004249223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979537,0.00013179057,0.0003336443,0.00030711776,0.0006030511,0.0006706756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998458,0.0004012662,0.00008150953,0.0002520491,0.00029462794,0.0005125147],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005130338,0.00023765217,0.00022538674,0.00039447536,0.004848157,0.00032060026,0.0007487909,0.00012223976,0.00032704222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025920523,0.00016146679,0.00008217466,0.00013822367,0.004491548,0.00037790727,0.00015607243,0.00017025744,0.0004684367],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000625165,0.000042710246,0.027810829,0.0000019583883,0.00007470788,0.0000070254523,0.0032916744,0.00020417935,0.000004618794,0.96386606,0.0038750998,0.0007586112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008749899,0.00010562409,0.010133493,0.0002381007,0.0000256357,0.000049368962,0.0067637474,0.000052308624,0.0000562304,0.05084667,0.9303796,0.00047419177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056852944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.66696775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92650455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008679873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018630208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99821764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2387780781","doi":"10.21991/c9qh45","title":"Distant Echoes: Discussing Judicial Activism at Canadian and American Supreme Court Nomination Hearings","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nomination; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Judicial activism; Supreme Court Decisions; Judicial review","score_opus":0.01779949315408676,"score_gpt":0.26522840769486056,"score_spread":0.2474289145407738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2387780781","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24905042,0.0014907772,0.05633771,0.31092325,0.0060505006,0.0022586908,0.0016796578,0.00071247254,0.37149653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99705637,0.00035210905,0.000254117,0.0012182134,0.0004001877,0.00007803894,0.00004009317,0.000011976677,0.0005888779],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967475,0.000123322,0.000493873,0.00069634116,0.00073762506,0.001201325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998136,0.00031397803,0.00022362101,0.00021990573,0.0003699812,0.00073654094],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053647545,0.00036930077,0.00043359448,0.00033781887,0.007028024,0.00016986532,0.00029129305,0.00017654659,0.0002380442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082812645,0.00029032564,0.00016855057,0.00047268218,0.023781314,0.0010014497,0.00021949664,0.00018897207,0.00019690715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006367788,0.000042623524,0.06926813,0.0000036906147,0.00006989086,0.000027461674,0.00032233898,0.0000075161684,0.00039056252,0.9199564,0.0031848708,0.0066628573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015800976,0.0000939799,0.024952145,0.00037544462,0.00011647372,0.00014032172,0.006450441,0.000043229586,0.0001961106,0.09338436,0.87159175,0.0010756244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12071058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43874806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8684069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022430455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037381097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528615719","doi":"10.21991/c92q2k","title":"Kahkewistahaw First Nation v Taypotat – Whither Section 25 of the Charter?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Section (typography); Charter; Law; Plea; Jurisprudence; Respondent; Political science; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Sociology; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.0325850467279558,"score_gpt":0.2637665648854747,"score_spread":0.23118151815751886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528615719","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12896562,0.001746461,0.06420231,0.30441657,0.023622539,0.004500678,0.0011814457,0.0008475428,0.47051683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962647,0.00013635856,0.00017014958,0.00040922122,0.00035607698,0.00009552154,0.00001019009,0.000007890089,0.0025498758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974692,0.00015888852,0.00051271607,0.0003964934,0.0008445135,0.00061822584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982757,0.0003056431,0.00033448648,0.00027865905,0.00066175696,0.00014375462],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004671025,0.00025956327,0.00028221268,0.0000948159,0.0037982953,0.00006664716,0.00044437218,0.00023020594,0.00046622983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011835764,0.0001556366,0.000293906,0.00047372375,0.010368326,0.0008338188,0.00016857394,0.0001693397,0.00013762759],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023739238,0.00006923168,0.033852775,0.00001237394,0.00007564715,0.0000012291678,0.00077902945,0.00004736909,0.0010094679,0.95556706,0.007343628,0.0012184686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015930377,0.000042930034,0.015468193,0.00040382042,0.000076472475,0.000024485067,0.00532017,0.00003159759,0.0008713033,0.013590201,0.9620891,0.0004886544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015311156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008313704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95474553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007323041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007550775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99749863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2549769496","doi":"10.21991/c9f09d","title":"Symposium Summary: The State of Canada's Constitutional Democracy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Constitution; State (computer science); Public service; Constitutional law; Political science; Corporate governance; Liberal democracy; Law; Service (business); Rule of law; Public administration; Sociology; Management; Politics","score_opus":0.013421334471025649,"score_gpt":0.24380214807491726,"score_spread":0.23038081360389162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2549769496","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008421946,0.0037521499,0.10915994,0.2542765,0.008179921,0.0020431348,0.0032578984,0.0003688806,0.6105396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944845,0.0006875809,0.00018148484,0.0017954627,0.00036297808,0.00009500018,0.000032631822,0.000008991039,0.0023514114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99516815,0.00026063374,0.00097313547,0.0006139036,0.0016797674,0.0013043807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963312,0.0012099117,0.00043461693,0.00043395275,0.0011771271,0.00041314788],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095414754,0.0004437454,0.0005338239,0.00018087961,0.006099157,0.000078791374,0.00087881676,0.0001606581,0.0004281495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014731608,0.00029025652,0.00030944505,0.000696774,0.049184214,0.00074789143,0.00030332437,0.00027511595,0.00009491484],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009551407,0.00008956894,0.015621867,0.0000078544745,0.00019566367,0.000027412569,0.00010993533,0.0003059202,0.00044658812,0.9524803,0.028795972,0.0018233944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012908037,0.00004222391,0.0014127995,0.00034630156,0.00009041733,0.00008795904,0.0014543084,0.0000209574,0.0006460409,0.24299484,0.75097716,0.0006361666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.105441436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34853864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9860625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010157055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02337501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2550987653","doi":"10.21991/c95h3t","title":"Judicial Review of Ministerial Advice to the Crown","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Advice (programming); Confusion; Nothing; Law; Action (physics); Power (physics); Political science; Politics; Sovereignty; Legal advice; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.025708336971098103,"score_gpt":0.3016147067215856,"score_spread":0.2759063697504875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2550987653","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016480399,0.020480389,0.044438437,0.3523956,0.009308958,0.0027398744,0.0013645786,0.0003923671,0.5672318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9819823,0.0048237583,0.0003981556,0.010825117,0.0010602496,0.00019802323,0.000020365258,0.000007957131,0.0006840746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99658054,0.00020973102,0.0008284146,0.00048397624,0.0010960352,0.0008012756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976252,0.00049597997,0.00028564266,0.0003772284,0.00091529975,0.0003006903],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010898326,0.0002992566,0.00049240666,0.00014345859,0.0029554907,0.000047834183,0.0007545418,0.000148602,0.0010243114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029659928,0.00018840891,0.0003304754,0.00075438805,0.013324207,0.00044512792,0.00030062482,0.00014044416,0.0007160401],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010139265,0.00006783009,0.0015922241,0.00005350101,0.000072330404,0.000006582165,0.00011281294,0.000005356965,0.00017156928,0.9253549,0.06869705,0.0037644268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006145229,0.00006145976,0.00046183597,0.0032063783,0.00008813184,0.000030526062,0.00091713737,9.576228e-7,0.00013471025,0.019236263,0.97490823,0.00033986918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013071432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002696279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9803343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028969944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035788422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2551230042","doi":"10.21991/c9s96g","title":"Accessible Information and Constitutional Democracy: Who Counts?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Legislature; Government (linguistics); Democracy; Public administration; Political science; Population; Diversity (politics); Public policy; Separation of powers; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.015732386423645044,"score_gpt":0.2744195894122916,"score_spread":0.25868720298864656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2551230042","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014989167,0.00074133015,0.30622783,0.028465772,0.002240659,0.00049126864,0.0007898149,0.00022527605,0.6593191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946363,0.00029140787,0.00034491817,0.0014991218,0.00024997175,0.000034205143,0.000022234886,0.0000032760615,0.002918573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981449,0.0000590859,0.00041166792,0.00024461068,0.00054734346,0.0005923936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988669,0.00021852025,0.00015980161,0.00016212721,0.0002883575,0.0003042919],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003733223,0.00018128556,0.00021177728,0.00011619615,0.0015983185,0.00015939826,0.00022084809,0.00018918976,0.00089510786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008347819,0.00014045103,0.00008503824,0.00020827063,0.018594583,0.0020903596,0.00009194899,0.00011549524,0.0011513844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011389605,0.000016016944,0.0164633,0.000008808177,0.000019600991,0.0000034214565,0.000027292148,0.000003063859,0.00001839624,0.9541294,0.024803901,0.0044954196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060016196,0.000011252645,0.0010497922,0.00017172696,0.000013600109,0.000048160702,0.00014474722,0.000024850207,0.000030303145,0.073318645,0.92434365,0.0002431028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030321584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010684795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99313736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030203338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021397823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2551431252","doi":"10.21991/c9nh35","title":"Legislative Vehicles and Formalized Charter Review","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Parliament; Constitutionality; Charter; Legislature; Political science; Law; Compliance (psychology); Public administration; Constitution; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.027164514875267373,"score_gpt":0.29288565910362424,"score_spread":0.26572114422835685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2551431252","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021528185,0.04493989,0.043392245,0.18028472,0.002225479,0.0017697917,0.00052729424,0.00049766205,0.7242101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.975162,0.016789174,0.00033290635,0.006082562,0.00029751414,0.0001696442,0.000020689718,0.0000077115665,0.0011377701],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972042,0.00015850355,0.0005577876,0.0005300721,0.0006957481,0.000853716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837786,0.00037662528,0.00019773163,0.00021890934,0.0004893123,0.00033954295],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068220805,0.00032875186,0.0004670994,0.00014653988,0.003279204,0.000075277865,0.00029112032,0.00016868989,0.0005770172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010392611,0.00023846423,0.00020676045,0.0003637587,0.016876899,0.001251962,0.00019489546,0.00015854865,0.00039519614],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034946337,0.00004489008,0.008634242,0.00002669515,0.0000850659,0.000013198752,0.00014117656,5.9638586e-7,0.00011811775,0.9691249,0.013071417,0.0087047275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001223876,0.00003911198,0.00087556423,0.0014978141,0.000086074295,0.00007122357,0.0008604906,0.0000035026633,0.000055664314,0.1181501,0.8766604,0.0004761606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005427856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080575154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9730092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025285923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015003898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2552659060","doi":"10.21991/c9d101","title":"A Recent History of Government Responses to Constitutional Litigation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Constitution; Settlement (finance); Political science; Witness; Power (physics); Law; Politics; Constitutional right; Constitutional law; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.036030059284368705,"score_gpt":0.27597178288593255,"score_spread":0.23994172360156385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2552659060","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015737973,0.0068530883,0.19374052,0.097329855,0.010696534,0.002379269,0.0028850832,0.0004916732,0.669886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909713,0.0010197375,0.0011307428,0.0021591936,0.00038297084,0.00021204508,0.000025986432,0.000009170011,0.004088838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952184,0.0002543385,0.0009676441,0.0007015252,0.0019048858,0.0009532006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969881,0.0007542229,0.0003557776,0.00036774052,0.0009851133,0.0005490565],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010049854,0.00039760882,0.00051932014,0.0002695689,0.001462451,0.000038213097,0.0005169089,0.00024792898,0.0015285107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039974707,0.00033406558,0.0002895529,0.00054356956,0.029621618,0.00078771904,0.00025583204,0.00017392953,0.00048390203],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003447841,0.0001959051,0.018672291,0.0000074628206,0.00011539464,0.000016079837,0.00030093806,0.00003830305,0.0016530061,0.9371864,0.03027549,0.011193925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011600014,0.000101172474,0.0013343655,0.00036468977,0.000059388844,0.000036943205,0.001692244,0.0000041136605,0.00064126647,0.040576026,0.95351696,0.00051280734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050403917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000953754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9752333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004439635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008837468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2553437117","doi":"10.21991/c9895f","title":"Political Accountability in Appointments to the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Legislature; Politics; Law; Accountability; Reputation; Supreme Court Decisions","score_opus":0.024116853473701298,"score_gpt":0.2826322086586384,"score_spread":0.2585153551849371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2553437117","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07272221,0.00061503117,0.020365074,0.28477487,0.003058826,0.0021464261,0.00097402354,0.00012116867,0.61522233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971836,0.000019184505,0.000096603355,0.0021393974,0.00019041469,0.00011092228,0.000007749786,0.0000042582733,0.00024782843],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99663246,0.00015584093,0.00063905295,0.0004196393,0.001043853,0.0011091629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815243,0.0005917124,0.00011625877,0.0002898776,0.00050257007,0.00034712098],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085716,0.00023424298,0.00034701562,0.00012854734,0.0016028753,0.000032108284,0.0005452159,0.00011905588,0.00028163858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018880403,0.00015355986,0.00012933029,0.00055550045,0.008800156,0.00035095375,0.00022255,0.00015183499,0.000070881215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007177445,0.000084572974,0.07521726,0.0000035806343,0.000036250833,0.0000068587196,0.000100639394,0.000043894517,0.000052369254,0.91552573,0.008371745,0.00048531225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015444624,0.000061105784,0.027529057,0.00036672983,0.00004201862,0.000028912134,0.012075822,0.000012697751,0.00042447762,0.2045144,0.7527972,0.000603141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37360984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83442754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9244614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015070662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010163134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2554226502","doi":"10.21991/c99964","title":"Renovating Canada's Constitutional Architecture: An Examination of the Government's Democratic Reform Initiatives","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Democracy; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Legislation; Political science; Voting; Electoral reform; Reform Act; Prime minister; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.015038857211804698,"score_gpt":0.24975281042046035,"score_spread":0.23471395320865565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2554226502","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08963524,0.00027220073,0.10436741,0.026073426,0.0036476043,0.0013740205,0.0027853164,0.00014187541,0.7717029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978557,0.000022899625,0.00034321507,0.0008239749,0.00024104427,0.00005397253,0.000015766302,0.0000062654503,0.00063710933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99617463,0.00030229986,0.00071749376,0.00041404014,0.0016437225,0.00074782857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980021,0.00045505018,0.00048743753,0.00036636993,0.00041632404,0.00027268883],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078771124,0.00026301187,0.00031016613,0.000056922312,0.0020945054,0.000048724178,0.0005644809,0.0001651505,0.00015533823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022585602,0.00016859116,0.00014062713,0.00044857353,0.015000769,0.00092060945,0.00014551084,0.00019973276,0.000009163478],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017336655,0.00006308319,0.011354088,0.000015051518,0.000040688596,0.0000045971587,0.00010305316,0.000046552486,0.0005861748,0.9844886,0.00043774507,0.0028430012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0048497394,0.00021412752,0.15653057,0.0026606598,0.00017034021,0.00027127244,0.010627281,0.00017981419,0.0070408243,0.15433912,0.66108173,0.0020345212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0896558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3614998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9082205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023139527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076289875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99920464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2554928324","doi":"10.21991/c9ht18","title":"A Project to Reduce Canadians' Constitutional Illiteracy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); House of Commons; Constitution; Opposition (politics); Political science; Democracy; Law; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Citizenship; Parliament; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.030062421665450312,"score_gpt":0.30633203005157505,"score_spread":0.27626960838612474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2554928324","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007043526,0.0015627577,0.1734193,0.1320356,0.007313328,0.0030602987,0.002700236,0.00087912293,0.67198586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98805314,0.0002362616,0.0017236876,0.0054784147,0.0010238551,0.00047209155,0.000068991074,0.000014957949,0.0029285732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99443966,0.00023246965,0.0009326845,0.0011064311,0.0014111269,0.0018776054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99654025,0.00058549887,0.00023012504,0.00047627342,0.001191366,0.00097646797],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008231628,0.00059396104,0.0005986753,0.0006920467,0.0057990616,0.0002329362,0.000824932,0.00033508035,0.0010362099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028296597,0.00048513655,0.00038690108,0.001360955,0.029677974,0.0014272108,0.0002913828,0.00029031938,0.001940849],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012812468,0.00012800473,0.009182148,0.00000626992,0.00013395966,0.00007094237,0.00038949173,0.00004551532,0.0005270452,0.9426484,0.04082356,0.005916528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013721032,0.00007057236,0.0006027961,0.0004138184,0.00006096004,0.00015243381,0.0029765782,0.0000047835647,0.0001684419,0.057859577,0.93543583,0.0008820899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011915009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0138396565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98100966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016122533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013846953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2555081054","doi":"10.21991/c91t29","title":"The Committee Process: Platform for Participation or Political Theatre?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Legislature; Parliament; Politics; Government (linguistics); Lawmaking; Legislation; Constitution; Political science; Public administration; Democracy; Legislative process; Legislative assembly; Commons; Law","score_opus":0.04173499695155266,"score_gpt":0.3386259006441732,"score_spread":0.29689090369262056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2555081054","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013634752,0.0007504001,0.33822906,0.23980907,0.005516073,0.0037888894,0.0018396555,0.00057795615,0.39585415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99470073,0.000044396347,0.00016389655,0.0012823305,0.0005820737,0.0005391128,0.000012972787,0.0000092270575,0.002665245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967361,0.000084760315,0.00057449465,0.0003752276,0.0006564682,0.0015729369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996607,0.0020173904,0.00017282757,0.00029073027,0.00043592296,0.00047611495],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078381435,0.00023367706,0.00025815374,0.000051123494,0.0045147627,0.00016863582,0.00046331488,0.00020656441,0.00011352211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029442809,0.00012361105,0.00019700854,0.000222914,0.009588924,0.00076369697,0.00006336311,0.00012196746,0.00016601267],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014801246,0.00006431586,0.006394024,0.000012434962,0.000037791327,0.000002782012,0.00007255827,0.0000048344427,0.000021337128,0.98202187,0.006465494,0.0047545647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010446707,0.00006280796,0.00043324308,0.00014624426,0.000028620743,0.000018198876,0.0014167208,0.000060004077,0.00015085188,0.23899086,0.7573919,0.00025582602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063577405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043869303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.981066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005391094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028405245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99678123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2555579280","doi":"10.21991/c9x09r","title":"Accessing with Dinosaurs: Protecting Access to Government Information in the Cretaceous Period of Canadian Democracy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Period (music); Legitimacy; Status quo; Accountability; Politics; Political science; Government (linguistics); Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.01890384342914863,"score_gpt":0.24789843338108172,"score_spread":0.2289945899519331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2555579280","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14594759,0.0004015462,0.056169745,0.22631684,0.0019780372,0.0047374493,0.0013500401,0.0001474373,0.5629513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99778116,0.0000320803,0.00038346142,0.001450254,0.000065435306,0.00010877395,0.000008243132,0.0000037188836,0.00016689314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788636,0.000108622306,0.00040306937,0.0002145696,0.0007832201,0.00060416217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895734,0.00013518015,0.00018772359,0.00022078888,0.00021040035,0.00028858657],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007365658,0.0001453797,0.00018058441,0.00097369537,0.00340791,0.00068066485,0.00061053253,0.00010916472,0.00020981581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00097305916,0.00011280203,0.000070339614,0.0011500057,0.0037118546,0.0027754246,0.00006608446,0.00017753031,0.000059234273],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049355076,0.00002601372,0.013677919,0.000015343308,0.000018352963,0.000021088443,0.0030414134,0.00023568764,0.000072234085,0.9697507,0.0032050184,0.009886859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006220014,0.000035176017,0.004379048,0.0003726602,0.000019893547,0.000048759444,0.013812752,0.000013524901,0.000045673463,0.0016015744,0.97878206,0.00026686935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.369337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9615697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97557706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022988385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072518555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2561793365","doi":"10.21991/c96h34","title":"The SCC Reimagines Freedom of Association in 2015","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trilogy; Freedom of association; Supreme court; Legislation; Charter; Collective bargaining; Corollary; Political science; Law; Association (psychology); Wage; Human rights; History; Psychology; Art history","score_opus":0.012945675346835462,"score_gpt":0.2734341127043858,"score_spread":0.26048843735755034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2561793365","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009659391,0.0035727327,0.01977277,0.74514186,0.005714184,0.0012648762,0.0022478562,0.00015560123,0.21247071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917041,0.00051753066,0.0001382397,0.0009272942,0.0002415503,0.000040604344,0.0000056070667,0.0000044389317,0.0064206077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978755,0.00012909916,0.0004685659,0.00024447148,0.0005974873,0.00068486965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981057,0.00084912276,0.00031037777,0.00023249816,0.00034563892,0.00015666186],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010370478,0.00014379213,0.0002018574,0.00013168989,0.0011609767,0.00005884855,0.00038565093,0.0001593365,0.00014194369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037627574,0.00010155761,0.00012851412,0.00043800872,0.00616838,0.00060869014,0.000061484134,0.00013540474,0.00013454014],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022306425,0.00002225875,0.050912943,0.0000023981986,0.000018736768,0.0000032393154,0.00008037781,0.000031842173,0.00009944399,0.84993964,0.09741611,0.0014506934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000850612,0.000012296723,0.0046984134,0.0001368903,0.000010784879,0.0000052642936,0.00044613713,0.000020150523,0.00010060776,0.048564672,0.944979,0.00017515085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015844142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12270246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98204476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009630028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003124133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99653625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2562854184","doi":"10.21991/c9z08p","title":"Daniels v Canada: Supreme Court Ends 150 Years of Political Football","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Constitution; Parliament; Politics; Plaintiff; Settlement (finance); Interpretation (philosophy); Political question; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.025839907581089023,"score_gpt":0.27802250632928044,"score_spread":0.25218259874819143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2562854184","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17473131,0.002412419,0.03735114,0.22819215,0.010184097,0.00412203,0.004633823,0.0008063736,0.53756666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99710387,0.00007226071,0.00047747136,0.00079084595,0.00028113555,0.000072561634,0.000024846273,0.000008879744,0.0011681372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962968,0.00013903507,0.00064331153,0.0004707819,0.0011571528,0.0012929254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977321,0.00063989067,0.00020574643,0.00027405532,0.00064503134,0.0005031954],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004182393,0.00028935572,0.00045571194,0.00009812082,0.0014214619,0.000046683675,0.00051929173,0.00023408458,0.0005266652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019163641,0.00023308523,0.00022807662,0.00030871754,0.011798116,0.00054634927,0.00021584454,0.00018772249,0.00008163901],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027664863,0.00006624794,0.027421812,0.000009810337,0.0001059433,0.000022158138,0.00016424744,0.000012854658,0.00043871527,0.955366,0.015336382,0.0010281351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019470991,0.00006773214,0.018956752,0.00033805493,0.00009321487,0.00004798132,0.007842029,0.000013822535,0.0008375634,0.016478421,0.9526046,0.000772751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2648181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40988928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9388876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016608007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00589509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2562886473","doi":"10.21991/c9b685","title":"The Supreme Court's New Labour Trilogy: Momentous Decisions and a Modest Critique","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Trilogy; Charter; Law; Political science; Freedom of association; Labour law; Sociology; Law and economics; History; Human rights","score_opus":0.02328326040981284,"score_gpt":0.29737446268251577,"score_spread":0.27409120227270295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2562886473","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040534556,0.0046281614,0.3974517,0.43306643,0.005765129,0.002295107,0.0015792986,0.00060426357,0.11407535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827873,0.0022408038,0.0005997208,0.002601707,0.00032683442,0.000075327436,0.000013375266,0.000010593729,0.011344308],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997212,0.0001611467,0.0004980319,0.0004839039,0.00065840327,0.0009865256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973188,0.0011463198,0.00014188584,0.000377149,0.00043592692,0.0005799401],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007551265,0.0002753655,0.00025846958,0.00014586949,0.005891247,0.000317115,0.0004992747,0.00021175835,0.00038717978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020731061,0.0001732797,0.00014107605,0.00037277013,0.008653095,0.00085091864,0.00020897563,0.00018984574,0.00005722054],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004152761,0.00006093412,0.0044533405,0.0000010112742,0.000057426372,0.000010813796,0.00012196332,0.000014088598,0.00020793774,0.95778435,0.028511353,0.008735235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013416634,0.00003722885,0.0020346157,0.00009890785,0.000029937348,0.0000324195,0.0015714421,0.000021989657,0.000048799382,0.20451051,0.7900039,0.00026861104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018883699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010045323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94225276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032005922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034031477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99540293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2563272628","doi":"10.21991/c9t96s","title":"Trial Lawyers of British Columbia v British Columbia: Section 96 Comes to the Access to Civil Justice Debate","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Charter; Supreme court; Political science; Constitution; Economic Justice; Autonomy; Habeas corpus; Sociology","score_opus":0.034974618822124756,"score_gpt":0.30304966708798214,"score_spread":0.2680750482658574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2563272628","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60150415,0.0009184871,0.12689821,0.101884924,0.030210178,0.008969068,0.005313333,0.0007681607,0.123533465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98777413,0.00018424554,0.00027042784,0.0028117574,0.000874295,0.00031553407,0.000022372304,0.000014128204,0.0077330773],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960821,0.00024720363,0.000807406,0.0007239588,0.0011082763,0.0010310105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971339,0.0007056044,0.00026353865,0.00040981756,0.0009325412,0.0005545762],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012557923,0.00019317192,0.00047124134,0.00008556351,0.004022782,0.0019159352,0.0011085898,0.00025580497,0.0016280274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002906304,0.0002700683,0.00028696549,0.0009234513,0.0058147833,0.0014623627,0.0004094621,0.00022332075,0.00019168644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006868425,0.00022973103,0.027959872,0.000050277682,0.000098919045,0.00006585301,0.00019728074,0.00019802594,0.00012991592,0.16938213,0.787323,0.013678157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0060096923,0.00025072784,0.0065282,0.0010137958,0.00021909429,0.000262947,0.0028452459,0.000009391596,0.000019391755,0.0065614334,0.97566545,0.00061463524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32574195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96451557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6387736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050017337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024000555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2563691799","doi":"10.21991/c9ph3g","title":"Constitutional Obligation of Alberta to Publish Laws in French: R v Caron and Boutet","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Alberta","keywords":"Obligation; Publication; Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.027321183109563607,"score_gpt":0.29933305565125085,"score_spread":0.27201187254168724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2563691799","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20825286,0.0013256588,0.07334482,0.07911814,0.0035008187,0.0019496627,0.0009688708,0.00014967656,0.6313895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973439,0.00011627916,0.0005784756,0.00065796135,0.00014217036,0.00010343738,0.000040116527,0.000003840144,0.0010138442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974764,0.00012025168,0.0006648758,0.00050030113,0.000668244,0.0005699295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980228,0.00067488017,0.00019105419,0.00019087266,0.00066358637,0.00025682515],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053253287,0.00025017918,0.00038448998,0.00032060102,0.0009513093,0.000084676634,0.00031509975,0.00015201246,0.0003716185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019014374,0.00021001996,0.000117725125,0.00052921067,0.012226122,0.0012514784,0.00020149272,0.00012815927,0.00009548242],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037171056,0.00008053048,0.12900402,0.0000066192847,0.00004369,0.0000034886612,0.00039219207,0.00005832882,0.0003131677,0.86360323,0.0053286073,0.0011289375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020437806,0.0001049917,0.02100747,0.00054653914,0.000031278243,0.00003234725,0.0020291323,0.000039347127,0.0005828729,0.061162904,0.91185045,0.00056889164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051493794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029519849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90652186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040769592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014929051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.990462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2566452130","doi":"10.21991/c9g09q","title":"Trinity Western Law School: \"To Be or Not to Be -- That Is the Question\"","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Law; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Nova scotia; Balance (ability); Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.08022226476180438,"score_gpt":0.35196583245039137,"score_spread":0.271743567688587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2566452130","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026437294,0.00022486762,0.02720935,0.8779414,0.0035894306,0.0028531179,0.0014348689,0.0005760507,0.059733607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92504776,0.00011372938,0.00075269863,0.06530593,0.00045937355,0.00031898817,0.000016543647,0.00001363376,0.007971362],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955216,0.0003515436,0.0006105534,0.00080183113,0.001410202,0.001304237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99659306,0.0010554501,0.00019358587,0.0005239056,0.0007294973,0.00090447615],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013361805,0.0004810247,0.00048234937,0.00013206854,0.0071007255,0.0003607736,0.0009678417,0.00028683888,0.0011512865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036873526,0.00027157582,0.00031232223,0.00063748093,0.009852506,0.0011775558,0.0005419137,0.0003153783,0.001646272],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020142212,0.000073768075,0.009947048,0.0000068889167,0.00011599865,0.0000126918385,0.0018249345,0.000027867456,0.00019534456,0.93931895,0.04744153,0.0008335394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010113757,0.00007940058,0.003506254,0.00020347472,0.00007778177,0.00003032594,0.008609201,0.0000028934226,0.0007598234,0.0033688035,0.9817343,0.0006163738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004913447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034537077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93595016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011252146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016552379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592745997","doi":"10.21991/c9w383","title":"Reforming Rowbotham: Towards Fairer Financial Eligibility Standards for State-Funded Counsel in Criminal Trials","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Position (finance); State (computer science); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Accounting; Business; Economics; Finance; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.08090724780616793,"score_gpt":0.3228051050623508,"score_spread":0.24189785725618285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592745997","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1719304,0.0046609514,0.5170467,0.008056146,0.018535137,0.006085194,0.03303469,0.00031370952,0.24033709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99680215,0.0002647787,0.0008097488,0.00061525824,0.00056166353,0.0004050333,0.0001896997,0.000028882485,0.00032279972],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941779,0.00006739641,0.003035956,0.0012272876,0.00023744059,0.0012540602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99606884,0.00026061208,0.0018673211,0.0010525484,0.00043728086,0.0003134238],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006717552,0.0004944217,0.0018953084,0.0004469921,0.0025227473,0.0005649554,0.0009078565,0.0004476968,0.00024370934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072402433,0.0006162877,0.00073227595,0.00014588414,0.0045982245,0.0017846122,0.00022769012,0.00036185049,0.0001658696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047963148,0.00015897966,0.049706716,0.00010570212,0.00008147146,0.000014257692,0.00016797727,0.00029554163,0.000020116533,0.9444431,0.0027254669,0.001801029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007061091,0.00018693847,0.0071480325,0.00027491007,0.00005137583,0.00005976327,0.00051848247,0.0015680457,0.00036105764,0.7799434,0.20166978,0.0011571178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028472587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042366614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8248717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017379738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002802757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593491886","doi":"10.21991/c94h4w","title":"The Incremental Evolution of National Receivership Law and the Elusive Search for Federal Purpose","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Constitutionality; Supreme court; Law; Receivership; Legislation; Political science; Ultra vires; Statute of limitations; Bankruptcy; Doctrine","score_opus":0.03989411658067844,"score_gpt":0.3321334183834593,"score_spread":0.29223930180278085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593491886","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014875381,0.0017075564,0.069899015,0.16149716,0.0019948033,0.005183474,0.0013983011,0.000114163966,0.7433301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980641,0.000114604314,0.00031881398,0.0004920714,0.00025118477,0.0002420024,0.0000300577,0.000004468023,0.00048268828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813664,0.00012660024,0.00035324326,0.00027517756,0.0006528004,0.0004555629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977092,0.00081094715,0.0002731799,0.00030385645,0.0007830054,0.000119794044],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018663092,0.00014487558,0.00017982165,0.00004447563,0.021091396,0.0004707082,0.00067994604,0.00011406563,0.000020753328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010067186,0.00009989007,0.00016716581,0.00009292353,0.03043367,0.000662157,0.00025955852,0.00018577934,0.000015554448],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018771659,0.000032769287,0.0033120338,0.000006888519,0.000052128977,3.200075e-7,0.0002441246,0.000070527596,0.00008368556,0.9945713,0.0010955865,0.00034289126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004364548,0.000044630247,0.0017971789,0.00007180067,0.000051006584,0.00002460303,0.011245769,0.0010171415,0.00036040886,0.44378948,0.5369312,0.0003022227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034871665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067668143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98318875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038553472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020416046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.980183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599328721","doi":"10.21991/c90t1m","title":"Reference Re Supreme Court Act: Atlantic Canada and Regional Considerations in Supreme Court of Canada Appointments","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Charter; Governor; Legitimacy; Original jurisdiction; Institution; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.04681979287507785,"score_gpt":0.2817716530001664,"score_spread":0.23495186012508854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599328721","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18622996,0.001035085,0.0006017369,0.085217565,0.003132669,0.0012280762,0.0014410706,0.00007301652,0.7210408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99727696,0.00022188512,0.00022709038,0.001107822,0.00009100758,0.000025018333,0.00008095151,0.0000068526238,0.0009624156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973232,0.00010417042,0.00060822116,0.00042862262,0.0009350928,0.00060068583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980718,0.00035448372,0.0003652378,0.00034304505,0.00062152615,0.00024390398],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044731944,0.00025195593,0.0003679931,0.00010040121,0.0034874447,0.00013953881,0.00042907154,0.00009820606,0.00028980384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016290086,0.0002590578,0.000059513295,0.00008588793,0.0058560534,0.00059704523,0.0002053331,0.00025158504,0.0000067629053],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002229077,0.0000367949,0.17624767,0.000012189464,0.00005617603,0.00005045643,0.000087177636,0.00007062242,0.0000238058,0.78329253,0.040072888,0.00002741536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025431379,0.000058195244,0.16227208,0.0006438998,0.000068045825,0.00012785746,0.0050978316,0.00025370473,0.00010661386,0.025358755,0.802593,0.0008768985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96483386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99908525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.811047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080021325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015675934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2635172517","doi":"10.21991/c9mq0s","title":"About Howard Leeson","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geology; Physics","score_opus":0.049261984048057345,"score_gpt":0.2382913969243983,"score_spread":0.18902941287634095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2635172517","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040261224,0.0027768246,0.019277632,0.0042640446,0.010871977,0.00036566923,0.0018333963,0.00014441015,0.9564399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.960685,0.00022276113,0.0007718522,0.00094076665,0.00022674956,0.00006112919,0.00006706404,0.000012080475,0.037012607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99749714,0.000008709228,0.00075772876,0.00084986124,0.000100685014,0.00078587414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99792206,0.000043905016,0.00064651924,0.0009809039,0.00011547733,0.000291107],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045982128,0.0003269667,0.0005682938,0.0002603225,0.0037103326,0.00043663252,0.00088651583,0.00017722041,0.004094141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007543572,0.00037162477,0.000337967,0.00009378402,0.006537647,0.0013929105,0.00047466782,0.0002184487,0.02844949],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021103258,0.000056599558,0.08251513,0.000010298734,0.00010437557,0.000012468833,0.000045186087,0.000078346624,0.000004951057,0.83353853,0.08332485,0.00028814544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013769404,0.000029403858,0.0035769388,0.00006100836,0.0000147696655,0.000052094212,0.00071752694,0.00059194927,0.00004021382,0.06566146,0.9273181,0.00055961864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017761948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003849966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95665884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023947255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030005563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2635700455","doi":"10.21991/c92m3x","title":"Les leçons de Jordan, III : à quelles conditions est-il légitime de déroger aux droits constitutionnels fondamentaux?","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.05378333636103678,"score_gpt":0.3759383895990287,"score_spread":0.32215505323799193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2635700455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08014443,0.022707961,0.15113321,0.12762648,0.01567791,0.0038485478,0.010619146,0.00089596806,0.5873464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9762591,0.002736331,0.0031771227,0.0022177792,0.0016341173,0.0007613428,0.0004164828,0.000056304303,0.012741421],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98910904,0.00082967774,0.0020747408,0.0020234946,0.0019259359,0.0040371213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99137264,0.0013812504,0.0015567899,0.0016920401,0.0022461738,0.0017510821],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020795828,0.0016580472,0.0016856961,0.00069568615,0.03515289,0.0017149625,0.0027565244,0.0012352807,0.0044700606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039106696,0.0019485947,0.0013225545,0.000848754,0.122497916,0.004680039,0.0013701665,0.0017686837,0.002615667],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015101691,0.0008771098,0.041771904,0.00010224627,0.000989245,0.0004166509,0.0012820205,0.0025668244,0.0005034431,0.91151404,0.037606042,0.002219466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0044719465,0.00017945618,0.0057840697,0.0021661338,0.00095637137,0.0016130841,0.014618031,0.0015846599,0.0006259184,0.22337493,0.74212617,0.002499232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01445505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012386508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89611465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049747857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02822841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2638979055","doi":"10.21991/c97954","title":"Round One: Saskatchewan — Canada Negotiations 1980","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Negotiation; Political science; Period (music); Law; Economic history; Public administration; History; Art","score_opus":0.018487019026777265,"score_gpt":0.24543781780730284,"score_spread":0.22695079878052557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2638979055","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005036817,0.0010491146,0.026217075,0.05263014,0.008545568,0.0008993021,0.0014319598,0.00024710543,0.90394294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97842455,0.00007675259,0.0005425496,0.0015599305,0.00049876474,0.000051249244,0.000113936694,0.000009547148,0.018722748],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973004,0.00007424245,0.00042110332,0.0004742018,0.0008493422,0.00088070444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978867,0.00010880566,0.0003170208,0.00069876213,0.0003964063,0.0005923077],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003626097,0.00022116935,0.00029221195,0.00030782798,0.023321323,0.0015131511,0.0008993797,0.0002115104,0.0011842913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009772792,0.00031050292,0.00017953769,0.0001895138,0.015090967,0.0014123905,0.0001517626,0.00032167873,0.00022558263],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001026713,0.000051453953,0.007040085,0.000007681316,0.00005679517,0.000033723172,0.0002663689,0.00010949724,0.000020648184,0.93266547,0.0583951,0.0013429242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056927715,0.000010571764,0.0032904362,0.00005703638,0.00005509836,0.000021230884,0.006206577,0.00003738309,0.00001279153,0.008105675,0.98121,0.0004239524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.987819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9733877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035123182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046407867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2643550004","doi":"10.21991/c9zt19","title":"The Beginning of the End of the Gang of Eight: June 4, 1981","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Council of Ministers; Political science; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Economic Justice; Sign (mathematics); Law","score_opus":0.014201487922866343,"score_gpt":0.24613694172947417,"score_spread":0.23193545380660782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2643550004","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05782222,0.0056552864,0.002708559,0.1043564,0.021218961,0.0018838834,0.0014866703,0.000056143035,0.8048119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99500924,0.0001391517,0.00004357019,0.00013890144,0.00010431279,0.000012967302,0.000003037949,0.0000039198626,0.004544883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981191,0.00011370682,0.00047794235,0.00019273047,0.00070580206,0.000390725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99775296,0.0002221562,0.00075771124,0.0007998646,0.00037619827,0.00009107765],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007272612,0.00012567732,0.0002336103,0.0001189331,0.011365249,0.00015608878,0.0014739544,0.00012878452,0.0001337981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015436861,0.00008674228,0.00036195718,0.00025428014,0.060567617,0.00037667697,0.000301346,0.00022349606,0.000010986027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012998448,0.000028621682,0.0117052,0.000017020295,0.000046590456,9.010811e-7,0.0004274854,0.00009581686,0.0002624259,0.979093,0.0076959645,0.00061398925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004425544,0.000009866231,0.00979016,0.0002450013,0.000070508184,0.000012941097,0.0027526345,0.000027960792,0.0005960669,0.023368089,0.9625378,0.00014641213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039316595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2843992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9557249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031517298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006095358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99953914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2651126847","doi":"10.21991/c9q95g","title":"Annotated Notes: NDP Leaders Meeting - February 18, 1981","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Democracy; Political science; Computer science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.06260484733694399,"score_gpt":0.3343377906131046,"score_spread":0.2717329432761606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2651126847","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024580408,0.0012760687,0.026715836,0.05009739,0.006214069,0.0010963621,0.0006830675,0.0005037019,0.8888331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99514663,0.000106277555,0.00052884565,0.0016183535,0.0006883717,0.000064259715,0.000043586966,0.000013287979,0.0017903694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99610084,0.00014162663,0.0006555285,0.00065673096,0.0009565901,0.0014886894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974682,0.00035957288,0.0004826739,0.000688212,0.00041787795,0.00058349565],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086669676,0.0003646218,0.00045024394,0.000120957775,0.010402769,0.00058763777,0.0010222477,0.00034692694,0.00039901357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048916657,0.00036697774,0.00030270233,0.00019588521,0.020920599,0.0016344482,0.00025563757,0.00039010477,0.0006840359],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002589261,0.00006771588,0.048574895,0.000017104645,0.000055975903,0.000049145878,0.00020419527,0.00011445097,0.000115412506,0.93922305,0.010768226,0.00078392035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001780208,0.000046685145,0.013845244,0.000649907,0.00006657131,0.00008511346,0.0036698587,0.00032292554,0.00026953334,0.040628016,0.9376358,0.0010001336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03484739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008329417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9705662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000511127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028186382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2656835543","doi":"10.21991/c96966","title":"Les leçons de Jordan, II : l’article 33 de la Charte canadienne ne permet pas de suspendre la répartition fédérative des compétences","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05619664453501023,"score_gpt":0.33656291197268334,"score_spread":0.2803662674376731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2656835543","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.641491,0.0041781263,0.044031177,0.092504315,0.002161943,0.0006964732,0.0011159932,0.00018519412,0.2136358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909821,0.0009424807,0.0031649193,0.00085016765,0.00053682696,0.00011177961,0.0000456476,0.000017807148,0.003348262],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949791,0.0008850606,0.00063895166,0.0007090852,0.00052604167,0.0022617625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966032,0.0008951267,0.00044439003,0.00052299036,0.0004938678,0.0010404374],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002654248,0.00051651214,0.00052363303,0.00015397737,0.017380428,0.0008436788,0.0009813036,0.0005545027,0.0009244887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002497461,0.00056596636,0.00036074646,0.00030694387,0.051265873,0.0022453635,0.0003643209,0.00071705383,0.00014329096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008691426,0.00031907958,0.06796832,0.00006763849,0.00012534551,0.0002758746,0.0039952463,0.0009106454,0.0007415872,0.9146174,0.004807979,0.006083944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014785271,0.00023318226,0.02888786,0.001328899,0.0004118117,0.0017208388,0.021047305,0.0025822672,0.0010846875,0.39709458,0.54310596,0.0010240682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08378612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20582765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.538298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019027123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065500196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W26748574","doi":"10.21991/c9nd4h","title":"WHATEVER BECAME OF THE WESTMINSTER MODEL?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Algebraic and Geometric Analysis","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.07064091124810265,"score_gpt":0.26554403757883394,"score_spread":0.19490312633073129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W26748574","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045752153,0.00056025636,0.7374445,0.0017630197,0.0012430568,0.00080887985,0.00029869113,0.00018462211,0.21194477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883235,0.000022408865,0.008899833,0.0006818951,0.000043523658,0.00004178296,0.000016069458,0.000013410214,0.0019575562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997458,0.00005853253,0.0008408324,0.00042044322,0.0006518606,0.0005703677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99805933,0.00019334162,0.00042603665,0.00074419647,0.00042015815,0.00015693874],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003676874,0.0003382477,0.0004799353,0.0003032741,0.0006774977,0.000025164178,0.00066668895,0.00022459829,0.0008651345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071045087,0.00023866458,0.0005477677,0.00092466926,0.0052560023,0.00053145626,0.0003423356,0.0002815492,0.00012587816],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032150412,0.00019967752,0.016168866,0.000027410171,0.00019924909,0.000004303794,0.00015337285,0.0002851947,0.000043815133,0.97648585,0.0060734614,0.00032663633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00139819,0.000064298416,0.0010120185,0.0002283397,0.0005335365,0.00019494201,0.0014069175,0.0055517075,0.0018458945,0.97742116,0.0096808495,0.00066213333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005406904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007023759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94257134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012537566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000982777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2692741836","doi":"10.21991/c93m4m","title":"NDP Negotiations on Patriation: Calgary, February 1981","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Opposition (politics); Political science; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Law; Politics","score_opus":0.02261727169332378,"score_gpt":0.27271253458603323,"score_spread":0.25009526289270945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2692741836","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038246468,0.0007038936,0.017973986,0.048062097,0.008759547,0.0009316011,0.00054952997,0.0002921753,0.9189025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98756313,0.00024218534,0.00036854236,0.0018129852,0.000840612,0.0000798304,0.00013889094,0.0000113082115,0.008942491],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744654,0.00010473006,0.00042983223,0.0005264073,0.0007573677,0.0007351278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979648,0.00013513003,0.00033572628,0.00074994203,0.0003357187,0.00047869442],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049125357,0.00023596814,0.00026739744,0.00057924114,0.02214522,0.001387716,0.0007784591,0.000282511,0.001158018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016495185,0.00030705205,0.00028436215,0.0002088776,0.01345493,0.0010743806,0.000132589,0.0003335949,0.0015010721],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029119808,0.000080906575,0.008049503,0.000005645664,0.000041941978,0.00002811534,0.00021840616,0.00013501801,0.000011032292,0.92633015,0.06253386,0.0025363269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095652835,0.000039959286,0.012895755,0.000085902255,0.00004793037,0.000024430738,0.0009016957,0.00006822237,0.000008128079,0.020586113,0.9639613,0.00042403257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1222392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4521043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9837385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014213199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007705283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2695559067","doi":"10.21991/c9ft21","title":"Was the Supreme Court right to change the law on the right to a speedy trial?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excuse; Supreme court; Law; Charter; Political science; Set (abstract data type); Computer science","score_opus":0.09176488806049153,"score_gpt":0.34214430239926347,"score_spread":0.2503794143387719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2695559067","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043178634,0.00023276766,0.0029397826,0.6671952,0.0048298845,0.00351734,0.00020668324,0.00010789133,0.3166526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9674226,0.00005179982,0.00010828608,0.028003337,0.0015755033,0.0006755804,0.00001139621,0.000011129935,0.002140392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99607694,0.00031103494,0.0005108603,0.0006301685,0.0013252404,0.0011457453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963036,0.0011062677,0.00026004057,0.0014758339,0.0004283692,0.0004258559],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025197195,0.00038910302,0.00035046888,0.000088766305,0.024178892,0.00116707,0.0027752272,0.00018589986,0.00093250984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002432404,0.00020043187,0.00033837,0.00031042396,0.014346133,0.00085434923,0.00053434545,0.00048355758,0.002253608],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006683568,0.000081237915,0.00020923959,0.000003432351,0.000038356266,0.000021427817,0.0009534582,0.000030242272,0.000020106654,0.9211196,0.076461695,0.0003928915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015730237,0.00013956582,0.00020740241,0.00018887958,0.00007427752,0.000032917866,0.0028342253,0.000026492999,0.00022038646,0.039881032,0.9544682,0.00035361483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047207107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027781252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9631047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003446137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001149433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2706279283","doi":"10.21991/c9v38s","title":"Four Lenses of Patriation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Historical Gender and Feminism Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lens (geology); Political science; Sociology; Optics; Physics","score_opus":0.06964321082579006,"score_gpt":0.3282604594837448,"score_spread":0.25861724865795477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2706279283","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036251273,0.0009934083,0.054883603,0.007361426,0.0046172356,0.0005511077,0.00021969336,0.00015230855,0.9275961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970608,0.0002771489,0.0008024291,0.00019433205,0.000298004,0.000031764383,0.000014323236,0.0000049652444,0.001316263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803615,0.00007142341,0.00044717986,0.0003234065,0.00060601137,0.00051580934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983684,0.00018115756,0.0003911341,0.00042707284,0.00045261072,0.00017966724],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005044176,0.00018548689,0.00032234326,0.00012814673,0.006572971,0.00010754394,0.0005311019,0.00017718652,0.00018107875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021623783,0.00018445215,0.00022575067,0.00012830264,0.01045548,0.0006944397,0.00015997434,0.00015253041,0.000113988994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030136165,0.00006037791,0.043071944,0.0000105293975,0.000053366504,0.000008177901,0.0012918486,0.000020785023,0.00009750314,0.94732594,0.0049259304,0.0031034313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024218885,0.0001318432,0.015644226,0.00018666904,0.00016521438,0.000034579924,0.024494955,0.00006641404,0.0005349659,0.105270624,0.8501809,0.0008676731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00088183413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005029594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9934356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022745832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015022838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99472034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2714097908","doi":"10.21991/c9km3k","title":"Annotated Notes: Gang of Eight Ministers of Intergovernmental Affairs Meeting June 4, 1981 — Winnipeg","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plan (archaeology); Public administration; Political science; Government (linguistics); Order (exchange); Law; History; Library science; Operations research; Engineering; Computer science; Business; Archaeology","score_opus":0.016847099873960526,"score_gpt":0.258967915321376,"score_spread":0.24212081544741546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2714097908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04100454,0.0017905156,0.0072531607,0.015059142,0.008321302,0.0009868242,0.0023724204,0.00012743528,0.9230847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99705565,0.0001282834,0.0005087522,0.00015799109,0.00010706625,0.000015322179,0.000050899525,0.000008243591,0.0019678122],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975767,0.000076553566,0.0006637155,0.0003708248,0.00075794576,0.0005542674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998046,0.00016450917,0.0007382975,0.00046942482,0.00032668188,0.00025512508],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005091091,0.00020601059,0.0004224992,0.00039686856,0.004205511,0.00024366284,0.0007245137,0.00019413557,0.00043137354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001295798,0.00026020198,0.00029887285,0.0002048712,0.02563372,0.0009405355,0.00019428376,0.00018294953,0.000056741945],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080154925,0.000113638016,0.009826063,0.00005147581,0.00009984154,0.000025834026,0.0009436805,0.0000692094,0.0014883915,0.9785822,0.007866105,0.0008534124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002183714,0.00008445368,0.0014784513,0.0010375746,0.00013888553,0.000046158173,0.021369454,0.00011195656,0.001947159,0.0045073885,0.9664266,0.00066817517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04563575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20010328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9740748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00092924834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003581437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2718497283","doi":"10.21991/c9b37r","title":"Les leçons de Jordan, I : quelles sont les voies de recours extraordinaires contre un arrêt de la Cour suprême?","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Political science","score_opus":0.03809130245330594,"score_gpt":0.3435488994852651,"score_spread":0.3054575970319592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2718497283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3091152,0.06090269,0.10968267,0.2681801,0.007522696,0.0014977294,0.0017704796,0.0005558538,0.24077258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9815129,0.004843616,0.0041678697,0.00066436914,0.0009487206,0.000105999105,0.000036654597,0.000033898308,0.0076859673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99368155,0.0008823447,0.00091062486,0.0009488742,0.0008477553,0.002728868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99524266,0.001591178,0.00069549464,0.0008276848,0.0006026418,0.0010403595],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031422814,0.0007960002,0.000805975,0.00021638058,0.015803082,0.0012519863,0.0016496464,0.0010627718,0.0010947064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004396064,0.00086546584,0.00070957065,0.0002303911,0.04975315,0.001896451,0.00040756667,0.001082773,0.00021347815],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013980179,0.00031655366,0.14243048,0.000113097434,0.00022007193,0.00034072722,0.0012731084,0.00083205296,0.00021724662,0.81121725,0.022790873,0.02010872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015649532,0.00011853805,0.014799613,0.0018553096,0.0005501843,0.0014725262,0.030384101,0.00090333767,0.00062211056,0.18947099,0.75703233,0.0012260205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.072018616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047758225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7342414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001944313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010025288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2764654819","doi":"10.21991/c93q04","title":"NELLES V. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF ONTARIO ET AL.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Queen (butterfly); Art; Ancient history; Geography; History; Archaeology; Biology; Zoology","score_opus":0.03713018147208178,"score_gpt":0.2856270832470552,"score_spread":0.24849690177497344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2764654819","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.103235565,0.0012003437,0.0038587023,0.072853334,0.002740704,0.0019586873,0.00016106048,0.00020885737,0.81378275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936673,0.0001341127,0.0010778467,0.0029664289,0.00004352603,0.000091232236,0.000019563238,0.0000061899623,0.0019937844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974566,0.00022119502,0.00059858966,0.0003925401,0.0006296701,0.0007014179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987877,0.00024006108,0.00023127628,0.00026355195,0.0003308555,0.00014652764],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086255436,0.00027495,0.00036312922,0.00010546173,0.0017221279,0.00005207395,0.0005278079,0.00016995418,0.0011581479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004571804,0.00019338478,0.00022818285,0.00038900154,0.011257922,0.00067740824,0.00020852814,0.00042158982,0.00011976646],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036745332,0.00012815086,0.14839168,0.000004053183,0.000060097656,0.000011990016,0.0072993613,0.000059004524,0.000015011988,0.83556074,0.008309092,0.00012409425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009747368,0.0000402708,0.050677016,0.00014627576,0.000041635354,0.000016147334,0.012891629,0.000013271609,0.00014630736,0.026095627,0.9085406,0.0004164683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22304434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40883926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90023154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008986827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031241174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W28088756","doi":"10.21991/c9qq2g","title":"JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE AND JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION IN THE TOBIASS CASE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial independence; Judicial discretion; Administration (probate law); Independence (probability theory); Judicial activism; Political science; Judicial review; Law; Judicial opinion; Mathematics; Politics","score_opus":0.03685082703434801,"score_gpt":0.24284116188262392,"score_spread":0.2059903348482759,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W28088756","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17517695,0.00017214156,0.012823401,0.008093317,0.0022596912,0.0014589607,0.00006498133,0.00016750328,0.79978305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97896326,0.0000071376767,0.00024222444,0.020088019,0.00046481108,0.00011701744,0.00007909862,0.000006161231,0.000032255488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831945,0.000025191785,0.00048047208,0.00035833535,0.00044813403,0.0003684105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930876,0.00005881212,0.00019367035,0.00017311361,0.00023702504,0.000028604263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047567484,0.00023211216,0.00017480813,0.00028821998,0.000868149,0.0002441667,0.00025817746,0.00013561145,0.00038019242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021696644,0.00019330333,0.00008166307,0.00036034078,0.0020018357,0.0019912943,0.0001100931,0.00028144362,0.00020849772],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008184042,0.00014605247,0.014862355,0.000011600816,0.000016303584,0.00052977697,0.00006411392,0.000012742834,0.000035487374,0.9824811,0.0015020324,0.00025655256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0059572863,0.00020248031,0.024864592,0.0003304775,0.00024227901,0.012875079,0.009150366,0.008954474,0.0004946856,0.63518673,0.29990834,0.0018331774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00097402034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003456887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80378634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006418749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000341043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7882681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809805504","doi":"10.21991/cf29358","title":"Jordan's Principle: Reconciliation and the First Nations Child","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Institutionalisation; Political science; Social needs; Economic growth; Sociology; Law; Health care; Economics","score_opus":0.021440169906610598,"score_gpt":0.294146900421974,"score_spread":0.2727067305153634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809805504","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032030568,0.0014306355,0.021951256,0.13626446,0.0049254643,0.0014538652,0.00016515594,0.00032263185,0.83028346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930913,0.00035884505,0.0004018457,0.003931996,0.0010188235,0.00011016475,0.00004334011,0.000008058496,0.0010356489],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975923,0.00017408587,0.00048253886,0.00046401672,0.0006585338,0.0006285524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99775296,0.000800196,0.00022265845,0.00032461304,0.0006794149,0.0002201307],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014542603,0.0002427889,0.0002620908,0.00018157622,0.015462803,0.00025711206,0.00039559387,0.0002881512,0.00035796166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035020162,0.00019591622,0.00015953548,0.00052435545,0.035113882,0.0007829844,0.00014399418,0.0003887325,0.00018849112],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061631756,0.000038079936,0.0051129363,0.000009760599,0.000049777194,0.0000020831812,0.0012223386,0.000027612821,0.0000010030944,0.9902885,0.002669567,0.00051669043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016722026,0.000028030168,0.00092629646,0.000107347616,0.000050199502,0.000056031615,0.002923078,0.00021890589,0.000022359705,0.04852034,0.94519305,0.00028214155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008851639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07584724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9898882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026052608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001509024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9858189},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810323610","doi":"10.21991/cf29360","title":"De facto and de jure Crown Sovereignty: Reconciliation and Legitimation at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Legitimacy; Legitimation; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.0191935199108331,"score_gpt":0.2674869927135426,"score_spread":0.2482934728027095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2810323610","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5368831,0.00095629913,0.06651037,0.06601984,0.00084286433,0.0015353878,0.0012823865,0.0001245516,0.3258452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975092,0.0000716103,0.00045503158,0.0010255293,0.00013778218,0.00003969361,0.00003323525,0.000003877239,0.0007240521],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986738,0.0000730116,0.00027390348,0.00023200954,0.00032584523,0.00042141878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989755,0.00021722067,0.00015787061,0.00016130874,0.0003098747,0.00017819896],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005585056,0.00012826225,0.00014176649,0.000041747182,0.0028684214,0.0000874885,0.00015586994,0.00011539108,0.0002756067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044168986,0.0001112483,0.000041003117,0.00015644068,0.0060394937,0.000340166,0.000105521816,0.0001175056,0.0000069484213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002227187,0.000013316189,0.021691658,0.000008947271,0.000019064662,8.211791e-7,0.00043500212,0.00008076582,0.00027821492,0.9693001,0.007485363,0.00066447485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009911853,0.000054868822,0.021136908,0.00010435706,0.00008408923,0.00012675184,0.0070664356,0.0029550088,0.0015627053,0.08974469,0.87574047,0.0004325615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0712959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42315573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8795554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006218116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050813816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2811405627","doi":"10.21991/cf29362","title":"Wahkohtowin in Action","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Metis; Law; Commission; Work (physics); Political science; Action (physics); Sociology; Law reform; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.05231313615420984,"score_gpt":0.34114393953631045,"score_spread":0.2888308033821006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2811405627","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16640788,0.0012079052,0.022953475,0.05419104,0.009978359,0.0021032789,0.000167818,0.00085811905,0.7421321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954263,0.00014775783,0.0008902718,0.0010290735,0.0007434049,0.000093924544,0.000031866843,0.000007378884,0.001630003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971433,0.00016842702,0.0005044528,0.00051237305,0.0006811848,0.0009902532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872607,0.00018606,0.00014457901,0.00021283784,0.00048775575,0.000242672],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061704166,0.00027945152,0.00031554277,0.00021287285,0.0035487444,0.00013379061,0.00036492303,0.00027765933,0.0008563847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011610793,0.00026590333,0.00017141848,0.0007405387,0.0146710705,0.0011124349,0.00015073727,0.00031458086,0.0010381879],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000413474,0.00008811272,0.037928794,0.000005985596,0.000033516393,0.00001159656,0.0011110094,0.000046001493,0.00018845679,0.95170003,0.0066827736,0.0021623473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014022886,0.00006571245,0.009237269,0.00014292586,0.000030343002,0.000028374458,0.018838882,0.00017086795,0.00038559028,0.019410271,0.94967055,0.00061690557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037448744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021651933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9429878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010125276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011578377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921501954","doi":"10.21991/cf29375","title":"Senate Reform and the Political Safeguards of Canadian Federalism in Québec","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Politics; Political science; New Federalism; Doctrine; Separation of powers; Law; Cooperative federalism; Dual federalism; Simple (philosophy); Public administration","score_opus":0.012292723289220937,"score_gpt":0.25036644728356877,"score_spread":0.23807372399434784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921501954","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12103122,0.0010067179,0.00022553209,0.14283608,0.0010639206,0.0008782776,0.00028438336,0.000036382928,0.73263747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963366,0.00005505303,0.000039730847,0.0024453097,0.000084680694,0.000027014148,0.000008008708,0.0000041323415,0.0009994771],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777067,0.0001295575,0.00046265082,0.00026688774,0.0004320368,0.00093820627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989082,0.00021480044,0.00010459127,0.00020522793,0.00015976788,0.0004073865],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068972044,0.00016016448,0.00033798916,0.00024267036,0.0008039283,0.000065739056,0.00025664075,0.0001748279,0.00013974085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005396641,0.000118897224,0.000114971815,0.00041378746,0.0099080885,0.00033670105,0.000072112176,0.00022440031,0.00008149162],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034738572,0.000016106904,0.03491768,0.0000138282985,0.000017308384,0.0000060557663,0.00022618275,0.0000112321895,0.000013586595,0.96429414,0.00036944347,0.00007969949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003850435,0.000029968662,0.011384185,0.00035909342,0.000025286912,0.00009560192,0.011184874,0.00021228663,0.000084400795,0.11004341,0.86228156,0.00044888942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97092414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95030814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87530535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012218887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063481373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921517813","doi":"10.21991/cf29373","title":"What happens when the assumptions underlying our commitment to free speech no longer hold?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Free speech; Censorship; Psychology; State (computer science); Expression (computer science); Social psychology; Communication; Computer science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02943114865596558,"score_gpt":0.2668799835422001,"score_spread":0.23744883488623453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921517813","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011999729,0.00080507004,0.84284693,0.07763013,0.020827396,0.0028833526,0.00013174822,0.00083966705,0.04203598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96846706,0.000080345686,0.020053403,0.0064654094,0.00025088308,0.00020516945,0.00005992836,0.000020014559,0.0043977774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99596214,0.0001381519,0.0006900118,0.0010261423,0.0010299372,0.0011536244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99668014,0.00018090651,0.00022039724,0.0019410406,0.00055210874,0.00042541703],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073390896,0.00050991925,0.00041200413,0.0003600259,0.0020102016,0.0013660359,0.0021340318,0.00024193758,0.0002494974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026898496,0.0004199682,0.00033502633,0.0006859213,0.0007727294,0.0029627385,0.0011071556,0.0005752853,0.0094712535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028085002,0.00012125714,0.0018418774,0.000015338572,0.00010980149,0.00003321977,0.00015577894,0.0016237304,0.0010467103,0.96117854,0.02879995,0.005045731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034068157,0.0004694186,0.0016454333,0.0007728659,0.00010505999,0.0015458371,0.0049911407,0.013379945,0.002331213,0.07151656,0.8979987,0.0018370132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000110903304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000266488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95646733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000461616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010187572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921820358","doi":"10.21991/cf29376","title":"The Original Living Tree","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Argument (complex analysis); Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Supreme court; Constitutional interpretation; Doctrine; Order (exchange); Political science; Tree (set theory); Constitutional law; Judicial interpretation; Sociology; Philosophy; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02095871892531076,"score_gpt":0.28926106029253557,"score_spread":0.2683023413672248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921820358","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05308567,0.003776114,0.005058502,0.049199242,0.009636755,0.0019680015,0.00009655819,0.0006174569,0.8765617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889398,0.00035836123,0.00044357416,0.0007373772,0.00040932646,0.00009271447,0.000013897852,0.000008349274,0.008996586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99676275,0.00019150578,0.00046980736,0.0004802219,0.00094973564,0.0011459967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976472,0.0011212187,0.0001943716,0.00032461493,0.0004534085,0.00025915724],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008979139,0.0003069387,0.0003030382,0.00007359707,0.008365836,0.00036686336,0.00066305377,0.0001999554,0.0009123587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012757137,0.00022094701,0.00028259185,0.000378216,0.0104198465,0.0008593322,0.00024223689,0.00037871965,0.0030908715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019482843,0.000039666436,0.060752627,0.000006034174,0.00007896191,0.000004672551,0.0005480943,0.0001099612,0.00005099109,0.926675,0.0098736035,0.0018408559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045663968,0.00003097809,0.0036560863,0.00010790212,0.00003336857,0.000023179799,0.015749453,0.00012282422,0.000019582083,0.007093341,0.97230864,0.00039800577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011074462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039292905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.962435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006921584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015408434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922453220","doi":"10.21991/cf29378","title":"The Constitution of Canada as Supreme Law: A New Definition","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.024256995596565196,"score_gpt":0.26270637281413517,"score_spread":0.23844937721756998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922453220","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02373245,0.0023550943,0.0024848718,0.033478387,0.0055290014,0.001750584,0.00022892193,0.00018913815,0.93025154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948686,0.00022160255,0.00039467512,0.0012302147,0.00020172834,0.000047040812,0.00005745285,0.0000065606546,0.0029721383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99644274,0.0001704928,0.0006998724,0.00044567868,0.001249451,0.0009917689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975409,0.00070513145,0.00034646588,0.0003406074,0.00070823263,0.00035868865],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060661236,0.00032216805,0.00039884288,0.00006002144,0.0051594647,0.00014723155,0.00053908443,0.00021541734,0.0006084815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012799934,0.00025418797,0.00023019832,0.00041491326,0.010786135,0.0007238335,0.00016719483,0.00031616088,0.00028336298],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006788054,0.000035165605,0.0062739183,0.000013197081,0.000107003754,0.0000059563426,0.00031413132,0.00028166888,0.00017215496,0.97659075,0.015834086,0.00030406236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012470619,0.000052582403,0.0005868599,0.00015815513,0.000059271275,0.000041815176,0.012142515,0.00004051748,0.00048866845,0.07051747,0.914203,0.00046210893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5521918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7103733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97113615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011187053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012721272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944893749","doi":"10.21991/cf29381","title":"Infusing Reconciliation into the Sentencing Process","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Imprisonment; Proportionality (law); Sanctions; Harm; Criminology; Political science; Sentencing guidelines; Process (computing); Law; Criminal code; Section (typography); Psychology; Criminal law; Computer science; Sentence; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.016811730600652185,"score_gpt":0.29741970741248597,"score_spread":0.2806079768118338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944893749","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78159994,0.0010095248,0.04752735,0.013989155,0.0049732663,0.0011022283,0.000028971843,0.00033960427,0.14942996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99745417,0.00008126975,0.00025386046,0.0011935069,0.00027211112,0.000056549485,0.00004382366,0.0000067631076,0.00063795666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759954,0.00013968056,0.00044627962,0.0004143228,0.00083420787,0.00056595355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980788,0.00023971534,0.00020508411,0.000306657,0.0009814744,0.00018826177],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009950713,0.00021065283,0.00023867597,0.00022486443,0.0031944567,0.00023173697,0.00038172578,0.000154592,0.00048672574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00093455776,0.0001767753,0.0001986012,0.0010400173,0.0029586426,0.0010024254,0.000082951934,0.00029356554,0.000696175],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036593003,0.00005330231,0.027961642,0.000019749416,0.000065714485,0.0000049219966,0.007354781,0.0067079607,0.00011666772,0.9443514,0.0010445145,0.012282763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006502447,0.000042969685,0.00016835182,0.00016129212,0.0002338574,0.000056076842,0.77761173,0.004397423,0.00010925278,0.015357338,0.20074181,0.0004696823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00612518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017016385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92899406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000648278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035988474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946090077","doi":"10.21991/cf29379","title":"Achieving Certainty in Treaties with Indigenous Peoples: Small Steps Towards Adopting Elements of Recognition","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Certainty; Treaty; Legal certainty; Negotiation; Government (linguistics); Constitution; Law; Political science; Indigenous rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Human rights","score_opus":0.012331494097884,"score_gpt":0.21853403112365175,"score_spread":0.20620253702576774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946090077","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9164776,0.000094131385,0.0053996714,0.00030613915,0.00032247344,0.0009245338,0.00019833048,0.00006609491,0.07621099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906952,0.00002667635,0.008295144,0.00023405853,0.00002890196,0.00008277766,0.00024730826,0.00001392439,0.0003760321],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99742293,0.00007257634,0.00072499376,0.00053051795,0.0006303271,0.0006186226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900496,0.00017650679,0.00033107828,0.00026918325,0.00011173166,0.00010654034],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036006165,0.00032409458,0.00038487223,0.00021076945,0.00031085353,0.000051446295,0.0003534702,0.0001418935,0.0018261599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018774152,0.00030115625,0.000115625735,0.00039674251,0.0018966051,0.00071139145,0.00025301657,0.0002452331,0.00048229203],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020331271,0.00024398006,0.8380355,0.0000610762,0.00006631271,0.00002203102,0.0004478581,0.00744091,0.0007509865,0.14815643,0.00004678913,0.0045247846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.027698778,0.0033509464,0.8154024,0.008384789,0.0005215469,0.0019843418,0.04635171,0.00879766,0.0151016805,0.023920719,0.041855693,0.0066297753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002162974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041235234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12423572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006572687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004670249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948261530","doi":"10.21991/cf29383","title":"Constitutionalizing (In)justice: Treaty Interpretation and the Containment of Indigenous Governance","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Economic Justice; Political science; Treaty; Corporate governance; State (computer science); Colonialism; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Criminology; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.011877901389146147,"score_gpt":0.28299654782823386,"score_spread":0.27111864643908773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948261530","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4679902,0.014593078,0.04022637,0.03457916,0.0052843913,0.005444039,0.000410179,0.00019648923,0.4312761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99791896,0.00066237804,0.0002630473,0.00066045584,0.00006433288,0.000070432165,0.000016132324,0.0000047427243,0.00033953285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759746,0.0002012,0.00062200095,0.00039281533,0.0006535241,0.00053302053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982298,0.0008495218,0.00030532168,0.00024239854,0.0002486515,0.00012428054],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011293133,0.00022064503,0.00040932826,0.000108406515,0.0010514561,0.000083454266,0.00033099452,0.00014906238,0.0002032884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007682382,0.00018079337,0.00014710266,0.00032733413,0.0126868775,0.0007267175,0.000117929194,0.00024237995,0.00007003212],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040181394,0.00006344539,0.041415397,0.000055120825,0.00003590256,0.000008825461,0.0018410041,0.000785501,0.00006528411,0.9540058,0.00019308885,0.0011288535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.032602277,0.0005208756,0.049256198,0.0049401317,0.0010851879,0.00072363997,0.12632035,0.006608494,0.00066228356,0.29078966,0.48359355,0.0028973653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028276488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030919937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6632161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004168574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018009621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971590923","doi":"10.21991/cf29387","title":"Ford and Irwin Toy 30 Years Later: A Conversation with Justice Montigny","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Charter; Trilogy; Appeal; Political science; Economic Justice; Politics; Context (archaeology); Sociology; History","score_opus":0.013361277003212772,"score_gpt":0.247270545106371,"score_spread":0.23390926810315824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971590923","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42215812,0.0034080874,0.024241086,0.03020406,0.005118722,0.0033608144,0.00043777653,0.0007691531,0.5103022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99632835,0.00030500203,0.0009881224,0.0014002083,0.00023890185,0.00007403385,0.000053547585,0.000010370774,0.00060143287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99730664,0.00009318872,0.00041555974,0.00060663343,0.0007844636,0.00079353765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998597,0.0002320344,0.00018285659,0.00029783338,0.0004006793,0.0002895561],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042732226,0.0003223722,0.00039297505,0.00019968947,0.001957375,0.0001769445,0.00034648858,0.00022058673,0.00075962086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032344152,0.00030627009,0.00011963424,0.0004333208,0.00819355,0.00096041436,0.00020885374,0.00026693707,0.00068437506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010001084,0.00006006988,0.07420994,0.00001929243,0.000109199784,0.000025716081,0.0005111092,0.0002162244,0.00006319077,0.92208546,0.0014564405,0.0011433327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006070973,0.00038573117,0.025465358,0.00058189704,0.00057087425,0.00024373645,0.03298052,0.0005000216,0.00013213888,0.1162757,0.8149447,0.0018483654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011585361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012846601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81348825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002884268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017481719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971747884","doi":"10.21991/cf29386","title":"Declarations of Invalidity in Superior Courts","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Constitution; Declaration; Statute; Political science; Plaintiff; Section (typography); Doctrine; Context (archaeology); History","score_opus":0.0271129156239343,"score_gpt":0.3023245000844432,"score_spread":0.2752115844605089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971747884","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52443,0.0004937396,0.023290666,0.015560914,0.0018098594,0.0022297692,0.00072202616,0.00018947701,0.43127358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99778354,0.000066638895,0.0008434958,0.000397825,0.00007125704,0.0000842246,0.000091568356,0.0000055358523,0.0006559098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979909,0.00009421163,0.00055224745,0.00035297495,0.0004946933,0.0005149377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988478,0.00021017868,0.00015392818,0.0003241168,0.00029489797,0.00016907185],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005522777,0.00016909333,0.00028986353,0.00021611548,0.00078388694,0.000063669955,0.00036830184,0.0001866426,0.000842227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034001912,0.0001791587,0.00015187972,0.0005276153,0.003795423,0.0007061515,0.000109080065,0.0002267794,0.00039668067],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013370311,0.00012418546,0.10782136,0.0000100421685,0.000013202257,0.0000023737446,0.00028798534,0.0009107185,0.0006089376,0.88920087,0.00084935024,0.00015760362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019617204,0.000052771982,0.010221847,0.0001922764,0.00003605741,0.000027543349,0.008217001,0.0007320467,0.0009113334,0.06594939,0.91108584,0.00061219226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012446247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035503746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9102365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027174441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029975676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972240141","doi":"10.21991/cf29388","title":"Ford et Irwin Toy 30 ans plus tard: une conversation avec le juge de Montigny","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.022283115270421167,"score_gpt":0.28672480930960176,"score_spread":0.2644416940391806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972240141","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060151063,0.01136634,0.2225988,0.32236105,0.017671479,0.0029596316,0.0012366683,0.0005233479,0.3611316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97526324,0.0009782743,0.0017367767,0.004371923,0.0004932165,0.00009671045,0.00024830073,0.000027941309,0.01678361],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99448,0.0004226041,0.0010151747,0.001066981,0.0011490068,0.0018662027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971339,0.0005205526,0.00045349618,0.0006037469,0.00061744574,0.0006708491],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014824511,0.00067695644,0.00076278945,0.0002592336,0.0022665395,0.00033883873,0.00077609124,0.00072625006,0.0031889777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000533875,0.0007833364,0.000560315,0.0009455759,0.012319825,0.0028539973,0.0002889833,0.00074907084,0.0038855157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014890915,0.00020185117,0.0108852675,0.00014247878,0.00014611971,0.0000787558,0.002692836,0.00710825,0.00025002615,0.9562519,0.020013751,0.0020798612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028747933,0.00020211017,0.0008630493,0.00089540856,0.00024596887,0.0003204552,0.021800023,0.006303065,0.00027494808,0.071769714,0.893268,0.001182449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012767517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006118597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9151122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017777652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011505012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972266157","doi":"10.21991/cf29384","title":"The Crown and Government Formation: Conventions, Practices, Customs, and Norms","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Politics; Law; Political science; Convention; Transparency (behavior); Crown (dentistry); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021239921858551752,"score_gpt":0.2886348179734638,"score_spread":0.2673948961149121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972266157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30706754,0.028045826,0.007733845,0.22290874,0.007921221,0.0062879524,0.00057708897,0.0006143982,0.4188434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99364805,0.0022793752,0.00035035834,0.00074508606,0.00013272194,0.00009580388,0.000021058388,0.000005114506,0.0027224415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99765825,0.00013420297,0.0004210259,0.00036585698,0.0008207141,0.0005999582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828976,0.000597597,0.00043773244,0.00019609023,0.0002650963,0.0002136955],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008042539,0.00023344936,0.00023331889,0.000031893596,0.0063811215,0.00043700173,0.00023302097,0.00015512033,0.00013934098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010690559,0.00016717939,0.000095342686,0.00019185721,0.007825181,0.0015927431,0.00025148818,0.00026870985,0.00018775093],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003307271,0.000030931158,0.040268127,0.00002036958,0.00006953935,0.0000026882622,0.0005635323,0.000012806738,0.000044223932,0.95225704,0.0045737494,0.0021239303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00094348576,0.000033116612,0.0053053633,0.000079483056,0.000053575237,0.00006974596,0.029418826,0.00020626419,0.000033641867,0.004772751,0.95877415,0.00030958102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006094129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019267347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9542004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004457473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004353856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99491245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990557264","doi":"10.21991/cf29389","title":"Advocacy Notwithstanding the Notwithstanding Clause","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Paradigm shift; Political science; Politics; Law and economics; Frame (networking); Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.02057622548626431,"score_gpt":0.2752041373246879,"score_spread":0.2546279118384236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990557264","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020373581,0.0013326152,0.47997922,0.018925982,0.011664502,0.0023748546,0.00021149032,0.0006643458,0.4644734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916122,0.00018502909,0.00044535263,0.0016663499,0.00062067254,0.00004806386,0.000047977275,0.00001825301,0.0053560846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959124,0.00020176505,0.0006532274,0.00068471575,0.0012028129,0.0013451148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977356,0.0005928458,0.0002796122,0.00061744975,0.00039519503,0.00037926855],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012178902,0.00040302877,0.00043381896,0.0002415259,0.00551218,0.00042407255,0.00089098193,0.00032404452,0.0016171319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054634496,0.0003011374,0.00034620057,0.0007791452,0.059284884,0.00133519,0.00020704757,0.0005203826,0.0014613848],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006260921,0.000063629195,0.03596553,0.000012610475,0.000082095015,0.000018603396,0.0013438414,0.00026105208,0.00012419799,0.95615226,0.0055622933,0.00035130855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019167921,0.0000645707,0.00020296148,0.00022525532,0.0000877757,0.00009657494,0.016942188,0.00039506814,0.00014802872,0.10112401,0.87805766,0.0007391192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002688165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005059341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9712386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007610755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003357789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991077786","doi":"10.21991/cf29391","title":"Shouting into the Constitutional Void: Section 28 and Bill 21","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Charter; Law; Law and economics; Government (linguistics); Political science; Bill of rights; Constitutional law; Blocking (statistics); Sociology; Public administration; Constitution; Business; Philosophy; Computer science; Advertising; Linguistics","score_opus":0.020440381728357857,"score_gpt":0.28113438042424244,"score_spread":0.26069399869588455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991077786","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3205597,0.009259636,0.034433093,0.18582544,0.02118982,0.0062067467,0.00039105755,0.0014254478,0.42070907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99433315,0.00034933718,0.00076493016,0.0019624755,0.000685091,0.00011664397,0.00006420388,0.000009809481,0.0017143855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99631816,0.0002575979,0.00064457254,0.000746825,0.0010220524,0.0010107966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99779767,0.0006981999,0.0002720701,0.00032065893,0.00060393807,0.00030746133],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011182354,0.00043560227,0.00044101675,0.0001557413,0.00798954,0.00034591023,0.0004605138,0.00034835562,0.00056179444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012861757,0.00029579224,0.00025612154,0.00059054047,0.02607291,0.0011944963,0.00036059855,0.00059827644,0.0005035949],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036808382,0.000050055438,0.07188337,0.0000171913,0.00011619126,0.0000058756464,0.001982565,0.0004259877,0.00024919896,0.9195688,0.0041154176,0.0015485703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014115777,0.00005665476,0.004298555,0.00018080322,0.00009819694,0.0001138912,0.038516596,0.0004292729,0.00009569317,0.01975173,0.9342981,0.00074893236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057687773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028451658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9301827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007711519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016595268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991114952","doi":"10.21991/cf29390","title":"The Notwithstanding Clause and the New Populism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Legislature; Political science; Law; Context (archaeology); Convention; Politics; Populism; Commerce Clause; Power (physics); Establishment Clause; Dormant Commerce Clause; Law and economics; Sociology; Federalism; First amendment; Supreme court; History","score_opus":0.015098768931774672,"score_gpt":0.2648937825354698,"score_spread":0.24979501360369513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991114952","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010500817,0.017468305,0.020042919,0.25706533,0.0088171465,0.0027551828,0.000105252526,0.00037092247,0.68287414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99193287,0.0014970903,0.00014475129,0.002394721,0.0005038967,0.00005121034,0.00001105735,0.000006931828,0.003457496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99717295,0.00019437356,0.00049013656,0.00044045775,0.0008396755,0.0008623954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99779236,0.0011559352,0.00019422412,0.00031604548,0.00026893988,0.0002725028],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012047973,0.00028878148,0.0003435856,0.00008494076,0.011194508,0.00041813034,0.00054495735,0.00016402472,0.0001773291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011050847,0.00017441333,0.00021665008,0.00045166418,0.024186049,0.00058368605,0.00028787437,0.00037853344,0.00041316892],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017261694,0.000015511438,0.012393431,0.000002638948,0.00009985965,0.0000041407975,0.00043549482,0.00005397618,0.0000107980795,0.97473675,0.010625989,0.0014488215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018982678,0.000016900161,0.0005537287,0.00006503857,0.00005196658,0.00004315823,0.0073951785,0.00006431915,0.000007811641,0.30414182,0.68550664,0.00025516524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036986303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046563116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.981432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024431467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026453224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99009275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009688291","doi":"10.21991/cf29393","title":"Charter Injunctions, Public Interest Presumption, and the Tyranny of the Majority","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Public interest; Appeal; Law; Legislature; Political science; Presumption; Parliament; Politics","score_opus":0.04535792687533429,"score_gpt":0.26677757817221115,"score_spread":0.22141965129687685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3009688291","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04338033,0.002824293,0.045496482,0.7742285,0.0042761457,0.0022344224,0.0008441824,0.00019516224,0.12652045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953478,0.00008885438,0.000047605587,0.003767198,0.00030857252,0.00005268192,0.0000064442343,0.0000037271009,0.0003771413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981058,0.00025764748,0.00044723123,0.00028024497,0.00045768323,0.00045136563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878377,0.00025299948,0.00021434516,0.00023666852,0.00026836517,0.00024386545],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057365245,0.00015901956,0.00025157176,0.00003143802,0.0020223954,0.00012214354,0.00045083518,0.00012754918,0.00015148924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020043924,0.00009798753,0.00018623282,0.00034021796,0.01717779,0.0004959848,0.00021468794,0.00026568767,0.000051346826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043057506,0.000028015946,0.023656918,0.000015677148,0.0000397675,6.3466103e-7,0.00029186084,0.000005938767,0.000022036618,0.96905726,0.006601783,0.00023706855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015765406,0.000019716634,0.0059101237,0.000088997585,0.000045028897,0.000021596343,0.0015227842,0.0002444496,0.00004032786,0.04140245,0.9489343,0.00019363733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010562567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015681332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9519674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00099801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014448542","doi":"10.21991/cf29392","title":"Seeing Double: Peace, Order, and Good Government, and the Impact of Federal Greenhouse Emissions Legislation on Provincial Jurisdiction","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Legislation; Greenhouse gas; Federalism; Government (linguistics); Law; Political science; Public administration; Cooperative federalism; Order (exchange); Parliament; Politics; Economics; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.02374672746555814,"score_gpt":0.22877400903918657,"score_spread":0.20502728157362843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014448542","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35300627,0.018172132,0.1626831,0.055401824,0.0019578768,0.00392776,0.0064510573,0.00037777756,0.3980222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99833566,0.00039441997,0.00023468632,0.00059111335,0.00017126361,0.000062974075,0.000041915075,0.000009724514,0.0001582546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981379,0.000029610144,0.00072569086,0.0005289626,0.00019976606,0.0003780653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892527,0.00014923241,0.00042662924,0.00017330424,0.00013050744,0.00019505518],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003040952,0.00031778583,0.00051824626,0.00008749683,0.0014576522,0.00013404872,0.00016514749,0.00013841684,0.000069510315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040151132,0.00024742525,0.0002112114,0.00032673602,0.0039247023,0.00061049213,0.00021049829,0.00030096498,0.00004254005],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065472204,0.00007991553,0.09211965,0.00001921418,0.00019257233,0.0000035247863,0.00018648987,0.0011506949,0.000038248945,0.90372425,0.0013900701,0.00044065283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.08431494,0.0029012917,0.15574148,0.0009596031,0.0005182319,0.0009641739,0.0044130646,0.07884858,0.0007871525,0.27503964,0.3906044,0.0049074395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007727574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000096856646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64532936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002050887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038661476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3032934504","doi":"10.21991/cf29398","title":"Universities, the Charter, Doug Ford, and Campus Free Speech","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Free speech; Government (linguistics); Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.019671048416240216,"score_gpt":0.2430327299145546,"score_spread":0.2233616814983144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3032934504","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010058096,0.0037312086,0.353664,0.30645788,0.005108201,0.0019163768,0.0011673673,0.00073275005,0.31716412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912965,0.00026911707,0.00068589963,0.0052515646,0.0007317079,0.000022594893,0.000058825924,0.000008999671,0.0016747707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99764043,0.00012228952,0.00034543828,0.0004895578,0.0006411064,0.0007611778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847007,0.0002377692,0.00014543474,0.00044635267,0.0002438872,0.0004564956],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037484002,0.00027373654,0.00029026854,0.00008524668,0.004469809,0.00023046182,0.0009816285,0.00021680348,0.00045449988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038772332,0.00021828257,0.00017302875,0.00041391279,0.075929455,0.00089356396,0.00040949736,0.0003204819,0.00016344861],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004275811,0.000030875217,0.0027205567,0.000011309595,0.000062661944,0.00004316079,0.0014066821,0.00003191564,0.000024113047,0.9568542,0.038119685,0.0006520285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015223442,0.000055332137,0.00005759777,0.000039654013,0.00007112556,0.000085403066,0.021159971,0.00025156813,0.000047727994,0.09260094,0.88372356,0.00038477223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004303839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009086845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9812384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024487358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023905137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99682623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033184756","doi":"10.21991/cf29400","title":"Un-Chartered Waters: Ontario’s Campus Speech Directive and the Intersections of Academic Freedom, Expressive Freedom, and Institutional Autonomy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Directive; Academic freedom; Harassment; Government (linguistics); Free speech; Political science; Autonomy; Christian ministry; Sociology; Law; Higher education; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.026411209778183037,"score_gpt":0.2871335909468699,"score_spread":0.26072238116868685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033184756","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15502876,0.0021493586,0.12165391,0.44251516,0.008567704,0.004166527,0.0009431104,0.00048143542,0.26449403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99457633,0.000119227865,0.0021156566,0.0022936494,0.00035655475,0.00014297689,0.00006704248,0.0000075365137,0.00032103347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99760324,0.00025361593,0.0006905249,0.0005045357,0.00048768954,0.0004603951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99775815,0.0006872839,0.0004093251,0.00020139024,0.00061386055,0.00032999928],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066789374,0.0002837991,0.00038294087,0.00019287143,0.0029675257,0.00019207704,0.0003451863,0.00025376744,0.00042632062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020161027,0.00023721778,0.00013707981,0.0005554563,0.019338574,0.0018023603,0.00021415032,0.0009584789,0.000036523656],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019429043,0.000058453203,0.0125167435,0.000012303814,0.00013748475,0.000005351874,0.012471712,0.00019697436,0.00018986494,0.97097075,0.0022918922,0.0009541853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0071308743,0.00012489504,0.006124125,0.00025019379,0.00034432736,0.00035546045,0.042096607,0.0011419732,0.000499203,0.04203695,0.89903075,0.0008646221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0216157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008493217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9289338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041900662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065935506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99903816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033284431","doi":"10.21991/cf29394","title":"Introduction: Symbolic Politics, Constitutional Consequences*","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Democracy; Sociology; Diversity (politics); De facto; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.028190580018755452,"score_gpt":0.26772541568922875,"score_spread":0.2395348356704733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033284431","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00062003365,0.0018340496,0.549765,0.2359812,0.0071397824,0.001156857,0.0007510343,0.0009398836,0.20181215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98006487,0.00031970342,0.0015164276,0.009233178,0.006598552,0.00009635757,0.00026150641,0.000016657643,0.0018927722],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946345,0.00027827654,0.0010069843,0.0011217105,0.0013674177,0.0015910967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967267,0.0002763169,0.00031824654,0.0004555645,0.00093979354,0.0012833583],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060516363,0.00055448496,0.00065778976,0.00025328732,0.0056608142,0.00036120543,0.0008578396,0.00047086072,0.0041255746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018134869,0.0005672717,0.00042847937,0.000966588,0.3015086,0.0015199835,0.00020041878,0.0006288761,0.0022581494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050564802,0.00011978061,0.003707753,0.000022876804,0.00012863106,0.00007239462,0.0005690213,0.0003965068,0.00019956472,0.9268288,0.06763697,0.00026715887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013648712,0.00007172181,0.000025184449,0.00006423695,0.000093594375,0.00024148998,0.003680562,0.00015261307,0.00029765768,0.11197836,0.8812784,0.0007513385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017722126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010635106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9794448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006403096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008339089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996779},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033340380","doi":"10.21991/cf29404","title":"The Toronto Municipal Election: Judicial Failure to Protect the Structure of the Canadian Constitution","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Constitution; Principle of legality; Law; Legislation; Supreme court; Political science; Judicial review; Legitimacy; Interpretation (philosophy); Subject (documents); Legislature; Democracy; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.017993900235984486,"score_gpt":0.2587652190297893,"score_spread":0.24077131879380478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033340380","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0136214,0.004229271,0.0062116506,0.65661925,0.008959641,0.006962697,0.0013877866,0.00032913793,0.30167916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917597,0.00007333763,0.000108319655,0.0068913824,0.0009539672,0.00009646001,0.000018281027,0.000007880803,0.00009068213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960889,0.00034338413,0.00069228886,0.00051869784,0.0012619082,0.0010948147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975486,0.00031651265,0.0002839435,0.00044335966,0.00085367303,0.00055392674],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000581485,0.00038053317,0.00036804614,0.00006207862,0.020736149,0.00027556246,0.0013853296,0.0002888569,0.00021482467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024624448,0.00022696193,0.000350507,0.001143327,0.020131774,0.0004929134,0.00033476477,0.00059921155,0.000077357734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077904384,0.000018289586,0.0035637415,0.000004913982,0.00012273,0.0000032874527,0.0011743557,0.0007144486,0.000301655,0.9770957,0.016311513,0.00061143405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049526145,0.00007240838,0.0011419697,0.00009135574,0.00010293425,0.00004304927,0.011254038,0.00006856983,0.00054642535,0.029130692,0.95665467,0.00039864072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30369437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95516723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97813827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011852282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010510576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033467396","doi":"10.21991/cf29397","title":"The Politics of Campus Free Speech in Canada and the United States","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Politics; Executive order; Order (exchange); Liberal arts education; Political science; Higher education; Public administration; Directive; Law; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.013957357414486496,"score_gpt":0.22911641902059113,"score_spread":0.21515906160610462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033467396","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2001229,0.009936154,0.11001439,0.5711628,0.006808818,0.0042432644,0.0027673915,0.00026019046,0.09468405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99588174,0.000624987,0.00010479251,0.0029969,0.00013886741,0.000020842623,0.000044046556,0.000004440109,0.00018340047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978584,0.0001998148,0.0004956384,0.00024123075,0.0005934323,0.0006114564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980191,0.0010435911,0.00017078476,0.00025113564,0.00027778512,0.00023762336],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055329327,0.00017139723,0.00026920016,0.00006256923,0.002400557,0.00008615841,0.00060147134,0.00008744336,0.000043428372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014083999,0.000107602486,0.00007877106,0.0005488681,0.08430067,0.00020379064,0.00017249714,0.0002499774,0.000005795954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056399673,0.000012713364,0.018828528,0.000008280284,0.000037356604,0.000014659192,0.0008049266,0.0005187013,0.0000021383805,0.9731854,0.0063477163,0.00018318222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037242598,0.00002871211,0.00033246411,0.000066065695,0.000053052347,0.000035142657,0.03121302,0.0029016389,0.00007017764,0.34678972,0.6144493,0.00033639622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.69389266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8806365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79575884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035260737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00714824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033585614","doi":"10.21991/cf29395","title":"Compelling Freedom on Campus: A Free Speech Paradox","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Charter; Political science; Entitlement (fair division); Coercion (linguistics); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03216580779953247,"score_gpt":0.26786256532552793,"score_spread":0.23569675752599545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033585614","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026988944,0.0010551177,0.62069976,0.059895076,0.005348041,0.001418179,0.00076087425,0.00093356875,0.30719048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879135,0.00017709739,0.0029304505,0.0065902,0.0016074117,0.000035151825,0.00012399319,0.000020285195,0.0006019342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956628,0.00018692628,0.00073738117,0.0008821668,0.0012757624,0.0012549729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99748343,0.0004203301,0.00026598666,0.0005660158,0.0003908013,0.00087344716],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005300136,0.00047246215,0.00056047994,0.00019062049,0.003807941,0.00028555977,0.0011765787,0.00039726813,0.001023749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013079697,0.0004541794,0.0004006808,0.0007319641,0.06685951,0.00082070695,0.00022840414,0.0005808736,0.0016295728],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000108852626,0.00014773292,0.0035123432,0.000015640395,0.000087235705,0.00010585624,0.0008476059,0.0016368711,0.00006553265,0.9585981,0.034192603,0.0006816521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028240362,0.00017683291,0.000033752614,0.0001745101,0.0000870843,0.00006585904,0.0058612567,0.0017043392,0.00023670252,0.13333115,0.85457397,0.0009305091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027815474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005145117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9852146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003626934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023567178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033746043","doi":"10.21991/cf29403","title":"The Conscientious Objection of Medical Practitioners to the CPSO’s “Effective Referral” Requirement","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Immorality; Conscientious objector; Law; Freedom of religion; Plaintiff; Sociology; Action (physics); Morality; Political science; Human rights","score_opus":0.040560526158433426,"score_gpt":0.3362132885655212,"score_spread":0.29565276240708777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033746043","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0071019684,0.0016380971,0.053991355,0.84052265,0.0054517905,0.0038456726,0.00020333953,0.000303815,0.08694132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99338675,0.00032364018,0.00018689474,0.0050221644,0.00046223137,0.00031674354,0.00002693339,0.000006318203,0.00026834322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995634,0.00041929886,0.00061859126,0.0004666443,0.0021524508,0.00070902385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973629,0.00084972417,0.00030478946,0.00024135891,0.0007788304,0.00046236182],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018598214,0.00024832864,0.00029493734,0.000058738755,0.007619557,0.00020315264,0.00079238514,0.00020123314,0.00030543306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077039227,0.00015464818,0.00024596057,0.0008429936,0.012024296,0.0005200881,0.00034692106,0.00042834852,0.00025902587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008105047,0.00005268322,0.0012583387,0.000009397787,0.00013014984,0.000005062594,0.0024581326,0.00057027576,0.00011894102,0.94166636,0.051660985,0.001988638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071392383,0.00010486894,0.00068919326,0.00009493736,0.00006485273,0.000018729606,0.03558293,0.00023709108,0.00016647011,0.002504996,0.9595571,0.00026491116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018828019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068435883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9862848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056973175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017951108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9936724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033782100","doi":"10.21991/cf29385","title":"fragile équilibre des intérêts locaux et nationaux dans l'interprétation de la compétence fédérale sur l'aéronautique: l'exemple du parachutisme","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011043121069756481,"score_gpt":0.27771550129420053,"score_spread":0.26667238022444406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033782100","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2523219,0.0025034023,0.32505402,0.031140747,0.0076777623,0.0014884265,0.0014599183,0.00037330302,0.37798053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98329693,0.0006039723,0.0039706742,0.0027113177,0.00044964394,0.00012551704,0.0008746469,0.000032708584,0.007934562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948465,0.00085631246,0.0009860236,0.0008869828,0.001205915,0.0012182377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963474,0.0012537154,0.0005163396,0.00037329827,0.0011039375,0.00040530303],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017189264,0.00059448625,0.0005227292,0.0003038317,0.0020882057,0.0004261899,0.00075540814,0.0006663884,0.0023597754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010008733,0.0006830777,0.00041790577,0.0007449803,0.013083483,0.0032758417,0.00026076433,0.0007301013,0.0016876351],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008675039,0.0004342098,0.12124231,0.00008259798,0.00013550681,0.000037308786,0.0014496488,0.01133452,0.0005900742,0.8576112,0.005556895,0.0014390146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029147833,0.0002258214,0.03443481,0.0014097586,0.00016137492,0.0007322565,0.0052916165,0.031073648,0.00090444135,0.40541935,0.516016,0.001416151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049948725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004369588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7309751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021647327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006049965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033795301","doi":"10.21991/cf29399","title":"Academic Freedom, Canadian Labour Law and the Scope of Intra-Mural Expression","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Mural; Collective bargaining; Scope (computer science); Academic freedom; Law; Freedom of association; Labour law; Censorship; Unit (ring theory); Sociology; Political science; Human rights; Higher education; History; Psychology; Computer science; Art history","score_opus":0.020545777426242893,"score_gpt":0.2553524037316265,"score_spread":0.2348066263053836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033795301","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0101697715,0.014418314,0.14805168,0.19854875,0.006007555,0.0033313537,0.0017015758,0.000422153,0.61734885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991371,0.0006444942,0.00040376524,0.0068040765,0.0005125226,0.000037428443,0.000034758854,0.0000078058765,0.00018418259],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975274,0.00020480993,0.00053821894,0.00040545542,0.00057659915,0.0007474831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832445,0.0002628587,0.00019552385,0.00021684989,0.00029079246,0.00070951524],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006472144,0.00024358206,0.0003898369,0.00009821703,0.0030604117,0.00010539839,0.00058897806,0.00031938238,0.0003709945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006751911,0.00017995019,0.00015691564,0.00039787593,0.12852128,0.0007631115,0.00014329416,0.00046789754,0.000075396165],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009983247,0.0000134063275,0.001981953,0.000016948083,0.000035113477,0.000009219687,0.0009416554,0.00012878752,0.00025937808,0.99088925,0.0053757103,0.0002487589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004147309,0.000053778884,0.000099697696,0.0002296826,0.00008107575,0.00004773596,0.004824865,0.00029617347,0.0009800715,0.15982535,0.82887506,0.00053921493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02836599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0341718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9812012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016338058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030415896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W30383532","doi":"10.21991/c9v95q","title":"EQUALITY RIGHTS AND THE ALLOCATION OF SCARCE RESOURCES IN HEALTH CARE: A COMMENT ON CAMERON V. NOVA SCOTIA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Nova (rocket); Scarcity; Political science; Geography; Economics; Archaeology; Engineering; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.07020988164317626,"score_gpt":0.38097468895108366,"score_spread":0.3107648073079074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W30383532","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3120914,0.0057913144,0.023156911,0.36278152,0.0046680253,0.009185849,0.0005062142,0.00026445414,0.2815543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98762804,0.000052558626,0.0005558707,0.011437247,0.00008232219,0.000094444906,0.000060508737,0.000006155978,0.00008284742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99582416,0.0012247614,0.0013072029,0.00044732678,0.0005408892,0.0006556853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968173,0.0015557662,0.0005984349,0.00049502915,0.00030334902,0.00023012566],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025152927,0.00025831957,0.0005636345,0.00019552006,0.0011759683,0.000012008757,0.0002858942,0.0002174482,0.0005232662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012037298,0.00017822436,0.000103785045,0.00030707344,0.007033912,0.00027816402,0.00019144338,0.0007581218,0.00012640546],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007788616,0.00021137684,0.03847217,0.0002756812,0.000037800484,0.0000022524152,0.008137956,0.00002078187,0.000006698249,0.9484635,0.0032552541,0.00033764125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.017257107,0.0007747301,0.029985884,0.004205113,0.00013761247,0.000040986695,0.071867436,0.00037122658,0.00028574214,0.06283644,0.8114013,0.00083642616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03121801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008384259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8856271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036284805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013967404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99566835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W30997202","doi":"10.21991/c9jm2w","title":"THE AGENDA FOR CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03551807080612919,"score_gpt":0.270103260699384,"score_spread":0.23458518989325483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W30997202","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010129253,0.00042298937,0.22994483,0.0038444463,0.004421175,0.002117961,0.0007603717,0.0002787112,0.74808025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99121976,0.000082555795,0.0045246854,0.0017547463,0.0001237737,0.0003694838,0.00013684192,0.000013511732,0.0017746418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99711066,0.000052807663,0.000616301,0.00056242873,0.0006232444,0.0010345419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988201,0.0001779508,0.00022870174,0.00042191616,0.000050641316,0.00030064755],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047585525,0.00039749118,0.00027675283,0.000054695207,0.0041320855,0.00009785868,0.0006289534,0.00020026829,0.0018095587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019413933,0.00029857742,0.00033397003,0.0002578883,0.021664813,0.0008859955,0.00039301306,0.0002606143,0.001134492],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000113669186,0.00017486708,0.02659671,0.0000046560053,0.000079837184,0.000009599948,0.000071766124,0.0001051701,0.00033797667,0.9575321,0.012897449,0.0020761772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026299383,0.0002467248,0.014968779,0.000060254843,0.00012350632,0.0003069539,0.002787668,0.0005095617,0.0018542868,0.12503399,0.85042834,0.0010500144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025579278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002351589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9810905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001177681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038427173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3116045060","doi":"","title":"Do Consumers Really Benefit from the Federal Paramountcy Doctrine? A Critique of Director of Criminal and Penal Prosecutions v Telus Communications Inc.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Business; Consumer protection; Service (business); Political science","score_opus":0.04411511722768317,"score_gpt":0.3174324300674451,"score_spread":0.2733173128397619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3116045060","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39169294,0.013514223,0.026190292,0.1288595,0.001827721,0.003863195,0.011445075,0.0004327994,0.42217427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99537677,0.00081336166,0.0013214569,0.0020137876,0.00012338236,0.000043092627,0.00020943047,0.000008341597,0.00009036992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976867,0.00023499274,0.0007392964,0.00036070094,0.0005904618,0.0003878409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99720746,0.00094353803,0.00035838777,0.00037763175,0.0008529498,0.0002600421],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043612273,0.00023070905,0.00035750907,0.00008193841,0.001711918,0.00013921627,0.00082534284,0.00012993986,0.00026879914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014822007,0.00020129647,0.00017321526,0.000292824,0.012632913,0.0005544324,0.00031155968,0.00035717318,0.000027773167],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015294706,0.00011582469,0.01942139,0.0000166272,0.0001222902,0.0000048337242,0.00082266395,0.00004054103,0.0007680081,0.976902,0.0010895496,0.00054333516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00422401,0.00033566626,0.03209534,0.0007229063,0.00048584215,0.00007796302,0.018129896,0.0017148468,0.0010854922,0.034440156,0.9055496,0.0011383165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030533676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021145248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94246185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001063385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015426454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121492773","doi":"10.21991/c97m23","title":"On The Trinity Western University Controversy: An Argument for a Christian Law School in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.030378373017318522,"score_gpt":0.2897247159256101,"score_spread":0.2593463429082916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121492773","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15058383,0.000092392766,0.017760342,0.52224016,0.0044213687,0.005249578,0.00095063064,0.00017132291,0.29853037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868541,0.00001060579,0.00016170766,0.012003148,0.000111362475,0.00011772085,0.000080232225,0.0000045295974,0.00065660675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816805,0.00021753681,0.0003271215,0.0003185078,0.00042271297,0.00054607604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99772775,0.0010523072,0.00017201938,0.00027232285,0.0004762104,0.00029937012],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055986905,0.0001755388,0.00018324159,0.00011586454,0.0026725144,0.00023296378,0.00040130777,0.00009941064,0.001255959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014227908,0.00015763314,0.00007528242,0.00042516252,0.0022162816,0.0014962615,0.00004011814,0.0003936381,0.00015322716],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050864837,0.00011749349,0.0093730325,0.0000031205761,0.000023961355,0.0000031381726,0.00018964475,0.00022878514,0.000008376573,0.9697208,0.020136792,0.00014399017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015498258,0.000049965918,0.003578685,0.000049408165,0.000024013285,0.000006930446,0.03342953,0.00025868302,0.0000210956,0.033949234,0.9267537,0.00032890035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8927444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9686084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9357716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020602774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019976549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122021206","doi":"10.21991/c9f37p","title":"SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC RIGHTS? LESSONS FROM SOUTH AFRICA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social rights; Political science; Development economics; Economic growth; Human rights; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.07820777877036614,"score_gpt":0.2358387415988572,"score_spread":0.15763096282849107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122021206","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031101221,0.010391954,0.06605152,0.009798464,0.0032651064,0.00076259614,0.0074491934,0.0004181716,0.87076175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99735606,0.00006129742,0.0010119563,0.0004446396,0.0002667619,0.0001041095,0.0001100897,0.000012739244,0.00063237356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973427,0.000022612587,0.0008796009,0.0009080726,0.00010582143,0.0007411672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895084,0.00007476715,0.00037348387,0.0002838932,0.00008166734,0.00023534668],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022636852,0.00043617914,0.00064971315,0.00027431193,0.0021603745,0.00012708243,0.0003615935,0.0002583289,0.0012823192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007461787,0.0004615322,0.00028292986,0.00018151004,0.0058642076,0.0008002037,0.0003070237,0.00030395042,0.0022875185],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005654575,0.00009193016,0.046342727,0.0000064015576,0.0002423332,0.00001789589,0.00067026174,0.000013368713,0.000006623278,0.94893897,0.00348429,0.00012868561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014381799,0.000041665557,0.009271244,0.00003235156,0.000050176266,0.000049357728,0.00060438865,0.00025827045,0.00006616716,0.6555934,0.33184162,0.0007531729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015626587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002942642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96625483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027837275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032485512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122432850","doi":"10.21991/cf29401","title":"Nothing to Declare: A Response to Grégoire Webber, Eric Mendelsohn, Robert Leckey, and Léonid Sirota on the Effects of the Notwithstanding Clause","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Declaration; Charter; State (computer science); Political science; Establishment Clause; Nothing; Secularism; Legislature; Sociology; Philosophy; Supreme court; First amendment; Politics; Computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.021922191032255536,"score_gpt":0.2682099569051747,"score_spread":0.24628776587291915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122432850","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21784896,0.0009918811,0.072099544,0.6101783,0.0040537063,0.0054528047,0.00081055093,0.00035730703,0.088206984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9616057,0.000033549655,0.0008074558,0.036737233,0.00023592915,0.00011432758,0.000006215403,0.000014595791,0.00044498598],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964186,0.00047468938,0.0005711925,0.00060866814,0.0010402134,0.0008866419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99574786,0.002547065,0.0002207772,0.00043701968,0.0003338546,0.000713445],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078865857,0.00038761695,0.00042734222,0.000159608,0.003931171,0.00016611232,0.00078006147,0.00018369583,0.00008477071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008819547,0.0002794303,0.00023045209,0.0011627253,0.008015123,0.00032484828,0.0004514205,0.00045016006,0.000084829386],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004199836,0.000053358857,0.002402508,0.00003121134,0.00007068932,0.000017100318,0.0022135698,0.0006209559,0.0019556095,0.98652196,0.005455978,0.00023704598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009904968,0.00034396508,0.0008435182,0.0007056953,0.00011049829,0.000052117462,0.005149156,0.0001147536,0.0016921106,0.0030875874,0.98628396,0.0006261611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043670757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032486566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9834344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000472032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048024245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123210615","doi":"10.21991/c9sd4r","title":"Autonomy, Subsidiarity, Solidarity: Foundations of Cooperative Federalism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidiarity; Federalism; Constitution; Political science; Solidarity; Law and economics; Autonomy; Law; Cooperative federalism; Dual federalism; Guardian; Jurisprudence; Sociology; Politics; Economics; European union","score_opus":0.02673319842238489,"score_gpt":0.3017333562858499,"score_spread":0.275000157863465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123210615","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011894513,0.00030765633,0.27198386,0.021396814,0.0026637905,0.0008343718,0.0004918707,0.00022801619,0.69019914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99583894,0.000033497337,0.00069898524,0.001137719,0.0003372215,0.00006541333,0.00006389115,0.0000074105005,0.0018169277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971828,0.00025287137,0.00066145166,0.0004196874,0.00067158695,0.0008116164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979504,0.00044450766,0.00027136106,0.00030611438,0.00066390133,0.00036376592],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006347531,0.00024921034,0.0004379553,0.00012480488,0.002782081,0.000185728,0.00040688572,0.00024782465,0.00036661362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001816634,0.0002519001,0.00022419548,0.0003809411,0.010464515,0.0007996621,0.00013443704,0.00025158015,0.00020959019],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000121231715,0.00010844527,0.009719481,0.000014466135,0.000046330013,0.0000022825357,0.00029959696,0.00016271029,0.00010852983,0.9865487,0.0024705294,0.00050679175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008710562,0.000049552877,0.0013302471,0.00013303493,0.000037270434,0.000023151653,0.00088392996,0.00062803115,0.00029128004,0.10677457,0.88857186,0.0004059918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007882386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072705923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9839444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004722167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045616087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124311134","doi":"10.21991/c9p955","title":"Upper House Reform in Germany: the Commission for the Modernization of the Federal System","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; German; Modernization theory; Lower house; Conviction; Political science; Competition (biology); Law; Commission; Public administration; Politics; History","score_opus":0.03634186960292081,"score_gpt":0.2694650440814788,"score_spread":0.23312317447855802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124311134","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036044594,0.0025169796,0.24035178,0.050734747,0.008830207,0.007324406,0.00082445337,0.0004130937,0.6529597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983112,0.000023434257,0.00010630793,0.0003508926,0.0001430955,0.00015900629,0.000002985817,0.000008321336,0.00089474104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803334,0.00015367904,0.00051676703,0.00022787818,0.0005213393,0.0005469967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987155,0.00029075355,0.00026494334,0.00037703218,0.0002568398,0.00009488504],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008871161,0.00016831675,0.00021320612,0.000043196473,0.00303627,0.00006111929,0.00069200096,0.00015759708,0.000029579305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044310486,0.00008541712,0.00021216132,0.0003060526,0.005010663,0.0003451024,0.0001342461,0.00019708926,0.000018068646],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000390358,0.00004827443,0.016552811,0.000023458248,0.000022340317,7.6734534e-7,0.00072944607,0.00016915551,0.000019592808,0.98127276,0.000951513,0.00017084827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026012561,0.00007413228,0.0683239,0.00118466,0.00012593609,0.00009322927,0.02766037,0.009386852,0.00060935516,0.06546566,0.82375956,0.00071506813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014295481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061591435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9622666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006330394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011594945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99826163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124666853","doi":"10.21991/c94q1t","title":"Addressing the Senate’s “Triple-Deficit”: The Senate as Driver of its own Reform","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Democratic deficit; Democracy; Constitution; Accountability; Law; Political science; Nomination; Politics; Public administration","score_opus":0.08137294387800247,"score_gpt":0.32893055160849527,"score_spread":0.2475576077304928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124666853","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08647075,0.006565099,0.0055013783,0.07280769,0.006777684,0.0019553697,0.00059080956,0.00027662737,0.8190546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949191,0.00010988758,0.000053592546,0.001492556,0.00041234793,0.00006059132,0.000013192499,0.000009494771,0.0029292458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99630463,0.0002732345,0.0006802373,0.00039391202,0.0013394244,0.0010085778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99769574,0.00023784315,0.00041281406,0.00045213493,0.0008105458,0.00039088944],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015625245,0.0002901443,0.0003739462,0.00008256759,0.002919574,0.00017838345,0.0008183336,0.00024475937,0.000105971296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020973843,0.00017378975,0.00025988033,0.0005582066,0.011144957,0.00075300265,0.00025148128,0.00040443504,0.0003884709],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037880407,0.00006115001,0.0014161575,0.00001574163,0.000057555804,0.00001240737,0.0005903833,0.00012917316,0.00017622636,0.9922874,0.004927586,0.0002883395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011845717,0.000045720037,0.0003577975,0.0004366605,0.000070073984,0.00015835797,0.011250791,0.00029597644,0.0010313622,0.035155058,0.9495872,0.00042638715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009450046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002950581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95713234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078417483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042231423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124769274","doi":"10.21991/c99h4f","title":"IMPOVERISHMENT OF THE LAW BY THE LAW: A CRITIQUE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL’S VISION OF THE RULE OF LAW AND THE FEDERAL PRINCIPLE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.020277116185443533,"score_gpt":0.22294320126077405,"score_spread":0.20266608507533052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124769274","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24347661,0.014695048,0.003986567,0.030454135,0.0040286737,0.0032416452,0.006193792,0.000039733623,0.6938838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966438,0.00015079099,0.000111821355,0.002723528,0.000042859418,0.00007529913,0.000007946375,0.0000073021447,0.00023667724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779594,0.00010383942,0.0011364453,0.00034253293,0.0002681554,0.00035307652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99791163,0.00017545804,0.00090583105,0.00069416367,0.00026127664,0.00005163314],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070257386,0.00027212527,0.0005521189,0.00003333895,0.0017461048,0.000036332287,0.0008997539,0.00013646283,0.000069937276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001866921,0.00013119087,0.00052762125,0.00025309558,0.02490647,0.00029815786,0.0008382596,0.00028683868,0.0000056999625],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009928055,0.00016313796,0.020718696,0.000043872416,0.00018914626,2.3676292e-7,0.0002980023,0.00012593731,0.00023263278,0.97719276,0.00092159724,0.000014722888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0054073213,0.00014585372,0.024426177,0.0005432886,0.00020463388,0.0001384207,0.0010356056,0.00055842067,0.02595444,0.61805725,0.32288706,0.0006415023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060304175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010090792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75316715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009609258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034765585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124914215","doi":"10.21991/c9zd49","title":"The Manual of Official Procedure of the Government of Canada: An Exposé","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Political science; Politics; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Constitutional interpretation; Work (physics); Isolation (microbiology); Constitutional law; Engineering; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023274348880416247,"score_gpt":0.24181212346937886,"score_spread":0.21853777458896262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124914215","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29296848,0.0026608934,0.0047123474,0.008692603,0.0061596124,0.0021848322,0.0016828601,0.00007484849,0.6808635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99929094,0.00008379742,0.00012916962,0.00017276693,0.000106935964,0.000033236443,0.0000040953996,0.0000040730483,0.00017500747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967093,0.00013379038,0.0007423011,0.00025283342,0.0016487243,0.00051305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998195,0.00020611845,0.00053626293,0.0003027778,0.0006302084,0.00012965838],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006114606,0.00020191887,0.00032859133,0.000033705524,0.0026627653,0.000012165957,0.0007557837,0.00011857912,0.000093512244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008455892,0.00013501159,0.00020088947,0.00039332698,0.017842177,0.00025277355,0.00021747417,0.0001691603,0.0000014905658],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013092946,0.00016396846,0.033818237,0.000012903768,0.00009131496,0.0000017455025,0.00068481656,0.00009168856,0.00017003472,0.9630739,0.001242866,0.00051755534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003490629,0.0005603068,0.14459081,0.001135588,0.0006016417,0.0000824288,0.17603226,0.00018852318,0.029930385,0.34396967,0.29773653,0.001681229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10238413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47976577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70632243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033246476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011430098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99863565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124929283","doi":"10.21991/c99m2q","title":"Judges and Religious-Based Reasoning: A Response to Ginn and Blaikie","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Argument (complex analysis); Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Religious freedom; Sociology; Epistemology; Focus (optics); Political science; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.016122856781298718,"score_gpt":0.2935534222624382,"score_spread":0.2774305654811395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124929283","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32071254,0.010994435,0.10037036,0.12648948,0.0037624803,0.0026700243,0.0011270175,0.0010021443,0.4328715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868042,0.0001272953,0.005217325,0.0066991965,0.00035041053,0.00008997753,0.000038299982,0.000013090016,0.0006602036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968357,0.0002952854,0.00044732247,0.000504584,0.00062922406,0.0012878708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99716717,0.00084018975,0.00014146083,0.0002974383,0.00032054048,0.0012331734],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013180742,0.00035816754,0.00037302772,0.00033287113,0.0028950789,0.00017549652,0.00024385723,0.00024050266,0.00014409111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025673662,0.0003709158,0.00011547186,0.00048770098,0.014593962,0.0007176251,0.00017925461,0.00026906154,0.00014289685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025076792,0.000075401425,0.07714006,0.000010094413,0.00003436108,0.0000115514995,0.00035347004,0.00007350713,0.00011458011,0.9154446,0.0060674134,0.0004241627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085934444,0.0000889132,0.0035413953,0.000118290125,0.00006713776,0.00016237464,0.003255738,0.000055442066,0.000061635044,0.0033746485,0.9878291,0.00058600423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005718492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002584374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98176163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037890943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049306173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125035025","doi":"10.21991/c93x1k","title":"Purposive Interpretation, Quebec, and the Supreme Court Act","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Supreme court; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Point (geometry); Sociology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.012454290916723192,"score_gpt":0.25396228198520937,"score_spread":0.24150799106848617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125035025","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012725695,0.00841411,0.073356345,0.2828725,0.004717178,0.008083365,0.00019110678,0.00059087755,0.60904884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926286,0.0005313648,0.00027649305,0.0039764615,0.00033591152,0.001088319,0.000039757982,0.000007633225,0.001115507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971324,0.0002527576,0.000583147,0.0004950513,0.0007388996,0.0007977217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976751,0.0007357236,0.00021375177,0.00025099883,0.00083428586,0.0002901235],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064859574,0.00033996868,0.00042342188,0.00015196294,0.0054681166,0.00043725583,0.00046575276,0.00019446778,0.000736692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012600746,0.00025283135,0.00023317117,0.00041811584,0.0360281,0.0013570572,0.00025213268,0.00033360207,0.00064773555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008750384,0.0000459964,0.008798703,0.000005029461,0.00013944368,0.0000047840326,0.00086787087,0.00006774016,0.000020558065,0.97176516,0.014734873,0.0034623507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028228455,0.00003199832,0.0042317607,0.00015940738,0.00013999754,0.000085298525,0.016345704,0.0005860246,0.000029107017,0.37679914,0.59812546,0.0006432758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03141221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025511809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97990286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003125358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002103036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125750742","doi":"10.21991/c9q375","title":"A Delicate Balance: Re Charkaoui and the Constitutional Dimensions of Disclosure","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Balance (ability); Law and economics; Political science; Business; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.030218855735044212,"score_gpt":0.2665382592094107,"score_spread":0.2363194034743665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125750742","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015228747,0.012339804,0.034420148,0.044911716,0.0042008264,0.003234291,0.0014207272,0.00050773815,0.883736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943355,0.0017217201,0.0012255819,0.0015408347,0.00017320883,0.00013079478,0.00005869933,0.0000065299455,0.00080715376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99724233,0.00025092,0.0006227622,0.00047853452,0.000721676,0.000683754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812716,0.00033434448,0.0003082683,0.00037061438,0.0005690544,0.0002905547],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010471912,0.0003084946,0.00045029365,0.000042349893,0.0038747254,0.000066897876,0.0005086179,0.00034264213,0.0006241207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00072252203,0.00019833782,0.0003360184,0.0004921423,0.073896855,0.00060539047,0.00022139381,0.00042127905,0.00006511323],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015253741,0.000115592695,0.015410797,0.000016419892,0.00013690357,0.0000074380528,0.0026642226,0.000022936614,0.0000578451,0.9712512,0.009999667,0.00016447825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006193845,0.00006815674,0.0015108837,0.00037737045,0.00034088411,0.00021983078,0.03398569,0.00021264465,0.00030578568,0.3503985,0.60550666,0.0008797443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031729686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037245703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9791067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011674856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017707435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974221},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126032045","doi":"10.21991/c95q3w","title":"Nonpartisanship of Agents of Parliament: Bill C-520’s Redundant and Likely Unconstitutional Approach","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Charter; Constitutionality; Bill of rights; Politics; Law; Political science; Public sector; Impartiality; Ambiguity; Public service; Law and economics; Public administration; Economics; Constitution","score_opus":0.03383397789530636,"score_gpt":0.2913964090708161,"score_spread":0.25756243117550975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126032045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08956221,0.0012555901,0.34704754,0.012941282,0.0015691428,0.002201176,0.0013363082,0.00026402427,0.5438227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99409646,0.00011936397,0.0048318445,0.00033083762,0.0001363268,0.0000875506,0.00009837367,0.000008291446,0.00029096656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971157,0.00016537153,0.00083618134,0.0005156386,0.0007625851,0.00060457084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981324,0.0002814339,0.0004235704,0.00037153903,0.00045814007,0.0003328886],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093952066,0.0002743279,0.0004668635,0.00022169776,0.0014248139,0.00006041201,0.000425938,0.00022474004,0.00015740938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006133366,0.00024115421,0.00020815906,0.00044373452,0.018930674,0.0005174128,0.00018554942,0.00022656395,0.000031812182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035037418,0.0002509563,0.022790436,0.000047352332,0.00006525651,9.617453e-7,0.0004573748,0.000886024,0.00030471312,0.97288245,0.0013809066,0.0008985397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028970211,0.000159169,0.0058730436,0.0003792245,0.0002112719,0.00008304787,0.0063039963,0.003856694,0.0012370166,0.15134178,0.8267253,0.0009324183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012270618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002512711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9045342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015205824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017955516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134237548","doi":"10.21991/cf29412","title":"Restricting Freedom of Peaceful Assembly During Public Health Emergencies","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Public Health Policies and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Section (typography); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Business; Medicine","score_opus":0.09492477648340834,"score_gpt":0.4033331576837308,"score_spread":0.30840838120032243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134237548","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4553826,0.007604562,0.070694454,0.2632612,0.022961602,0.0025690375,0.0012272822,0.0007669137,0.17553239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99005055,0.00065803406,0.0021093923,0.0037137866,0.0008074535,0.00020892848,0.00041679692,0.000022243803,0.0020128312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939367,0.00065635936,0.0019878172,0.0006392128,0.0007437463,0.0020361438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952473,0.00058695005,0.00097161764,0.0006834499,0.0017207413,0.00078995014],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016152693,0.00036725824,0.00069613184,0.00047956698,0.005184069,0.0000444476,0.00038360045,0.000357608,0.0012846945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036876847,0.00037959142,0.0002582662,0.0013792636,0.0018736292,0.00087241107,0.00040888975,0.00087784714,0.00025602235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017040584,0.00020373882,0.08816666,0.00039560505,0.00007399522,0.000008249197,0.0008452823,0.00020148169,0.00071828166,0.8702281,0.03868522,0.00045631843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032289454,0.00011559248,0.048259567,0.001113869,0.000043823682,0.00027527157,0.06818909,0.0006584288,0.0003447917,0.0037902151,0.8731429,0.0008375203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014301244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010556424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8664379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011236174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027051581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139205488","doi":"10.21991/cf29411","title":"Toronto's 2018 Municipal Election, Rights of Democratic Participation, and Section 2(b) of the Charter","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Public administration; Political science; Democracy; Government (linguistics); Representation (politics); Local government; General election; Section (typography); Law; Business; Politics; Advertising","score_opus":0.015306788955929419,"score_gpt":0.2880664323400087,"score_spread":0.2727596433840793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3139205488","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39631814,0.009169175,0.028375434,0.010374902,0.0133106075,0.0019491578,0.00041195285,0.00025999587,0.5398306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99806696,0.00006442173,0.000452857,0.00019435566,0.00020341664,0.00003822107,0.00001710362,0.0000048914526,0.0009577847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997832,0.00025661377,0.0005935062,0.00031477984,0.00057816145,0.0004249113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998273,0.00018687172,0.00029627563,0.00035355857,0.0007491962,0.00014110014],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037971928,0.00017448826,0.00028835202,0.000055632394,0.0017118086,0.000043927204,0.00023852513,0.00019318335,0.00037403224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00075858366,0.00014635125,0.0001555139,0.00046502324,0.0071633244,0.00067850796,0.00013335691,0.00016557805,0.000009553372],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021401751,0.00011318643,0.02127544,0.000019663239,0.00006868382,0.0000019920933,0.0036646177,0.00008766594,0.0007283453,0.9718803,0.0020116032,0.00012709547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002923275,0.00018309016,0.01342412,0.0005702769,0.0005001623,0.00011556856,0.017832683,0.0009697668,0.025263691,0.12236115,0.81486803,0.0009881548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002948232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022613212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84951913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002684361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00134897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99958783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155090396","doi":"10.21991/cf29415","title":"“This Charter applies…”: The Supreme Court of Canada’s Fundamental Error in the Trinity Western University decisions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University; Royal Society of Canada; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Battle; Academic freedom; Charter; Sociology; Higher education; History","score_opus":0.04662990985390994,"score_gpt":0.2854992316328855,"score_spread":0.23886932177897555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155090396","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29660794,0.0020300508,0.0050540348,0.32871687,0.0043989704,0.00300109,0.0022518886,0.00014690247,0.35779226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99653816,0.00011899725,0.00010616592,0.0013221555,0.000091331916,0.0000192497,0.00004906244,0.0000033067083,0.0017515463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973046,0.0003538089,0.0004048203,0.00033680402,0.0009664354,0.00063354225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980986,0.00089451624,0.00016497345,0.00029219233,0.00041583192,0.00013387675],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007386933,0.00021345126,0.00030269427,0.000053703283,0.004085173,0.00007642248,0.0006485557,0.00012873765,0.0004629203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007902434,0.00014800392,0.00018286034,0.0005447401,0.007161585,0.0004183256,0.0002420683,0.00036476165,0.000037288497],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036237267,0.00011788704,0.044731457,0.0000054420007,0.00007087489,0.00005462119,0.0026684788,0.00009666869,0.00003919308,0.9334171,0.018600734,0.00016133914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010860824,0.000016529953,0.025712,0.0000886459,0.000061995066,0.000041979754,0.10384486,0.000035327703,0.00005083992,0.0016355276,0.8671312,0.00029505359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12624352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83606946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93178153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009029626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059506013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155689419","doi":"10.21991/cf29416","title":"The Common Good and Legal Interpretation: A Response to Leonid Sirota and Mark Mancini","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Toronto; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Originalism; Natural law; Witness; Common law; Legal realism; Intelligibility (philosophy); Sociology; Epistemology; Legal profession; Political science; Constitutional law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01283745146986231,"score_gpt":0.29227039320821185,"score_spread":0.27943294173834954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155689419","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22242454,0.0052541518,0.058146756,0.4252296,0.0021645494,0.0021440093,0.000572581,0.00034657898,0.28371724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99337107,0.00021871061,0.00089806656,0.0023644983,0.0001180257,0.0001413248,0.000022467597,0.0000066185075,0.0028592013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979741,0.00024853795,0.00038961213,0.0004529008,0.00039863726,0.00053619134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981251,0.00080364733,0.00009618316,0.00031818807,0.00030300015,0.00035387557],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008963755,0.00019628569,0.00021042857,0.00007536629,0.004941185,0.00054886925,0.00025460505,0.00012442649,0.00005782589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010167671,0.00017302002,0.00008527899,0.00040131036,0.004959507,0.00048367365,0.00032345325,0.00023956868,0.00007288282],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019067142,0.000037319733,0.004165457,0.000005741016,0.00003222243,0.000025848853,0.00031624112,0.000049838487,0.0002882639,0.9895059,0.0017239904,0.0036585112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005574257,0.00003938673,0.0042463,0.00007719727,0.000031873347,0.0002302399,0.0067207534,0.00024291602,0.00011716922,0.014908852,0.9725579,0.0002699999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029695244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005024105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97459704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017602762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018897563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99774843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3156668608","doi":"","title":"Constitutionalism and the Genetic Non-Discrimination Act Reference","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Supreme court; Political science; Federalism; Jurisprudence; Law; Constitutionalism; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Sociology; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.05243330033126495,"score_gpt":0.308828175305707,"score_spread":0.256394874974442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3156668608","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009678197,0.00066732295,0.12526137,0.18302071,0.0013836528,0.0015720169,0.00025121734,0.00033389666,0.6778316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885286,0.00027745048,0.0008762229,0.009466771,0.00029520976,0.00011132034,0.00009364242,0.000008152674,0.00034260654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970235,0.00030793974,0.0006022817,0.00055930467,0.000864953,0.00064197136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981852,0.00041231213,0.00022430051,0.0002436997,0.00046488582,0.00046957852],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074324076,0.0003027464,0.00035897025,0.000110865905,0.003569385,0.00034196893,0.00049857236,0.00021956775,0.0004462084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015182332,0.00024662222,0.00016803273,0.00045051728,0.02435321,0.00086672883,0.00019572552,0.00034925778,0.0003197637],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012478796,0.000042122763,0.0027360287,0.000020953,0.000046570814,0.000010024955,0.0020083324,0.00012699678,0.000033303284,0.98951,0.003841594,0.0014993038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006963135,0.000079264195,0.005004218,0.00016233434,0.00023720152,0.00009421072,0.014129642,0.002301923,0.000089380555,0.20649017,0.7634604,0.0009881334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00073538016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006690245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9788504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001579491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019017459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160588698","doi":"10.21991/cf29420","title":"Intersections and Roads Untravelled: Sex and Family Status in Fraser v Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Political science; Constitution; Context (archaeology); Equity (law); Statute; High Court; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.017120867982033924,"score_gpt":0.2631981880009177,"score_spread":0.24607732001888377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160588698","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8274869,0.010005705,0.003851389,0.023908127,0.0030856873,0.0009587085,0.0006207757,0.00016343076,0.1299193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962087,0.0010061079,0.00032818638,0.001278148,0.00008544478,0.000045100292,0.000040391184,0.0000052529745,0.0010026312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977852,0.00013883697,0.00038222724,0.00047806438,0.00044549015,0.0007701754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891126,0.0002672721,0.00008080457,0.00012736712,0.00028045403,0.00033281956],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023743883,0.0002399455,0.00031203736,0.00008683864,0.0022620435,0.00014159671,0.0001095117,0.00014427045,0.00012296508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074490573,0.00023813832,0.000059805272,0.00039736857,0.005213962,0.00043166755,0.00019383259,0.00029775416,0.000009249138],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015179325,0.000048206784,0.22318633,0.000012804907,0.00007039975,0.0000815128,0.001321081,0.00015772512,0.00011229242,0.7695265,0.0038486642,0.0016193108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024319624,0.000029224895,0.08805051,0.00019293958,0.000055271186,0.00007706676,0.12974237,0.0002517646,0.00018426306,0.0071872105,0.77096635,0.00083108625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47245118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9292005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7671177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008136728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043114503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99903685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160687993","doi":"10.21991/cf29422","title":"The Alchemy of Equality Rights","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Supreme court; Constitution; Political science; Politics; Character (mathematics); Test (biology); Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03775945820894088,"score_gpt":0.3221107729389199,"score_spread":0.284351314729979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160687993","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030835502,0.01061578,0.022044448,0.07762408,0.006529729,0.001324376,0.00046463415,0.00039591402,0.85016555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99575686,0.00032398707,0.000746657,0.00042125687,0.00021579591,0.000053724354,0.00004146765,0.0000040779055,0.0024361478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99702364,0.00028918553,0.0006248854,0.0003957166,0.00089104957,0.0007754913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972961,0.0007602751,0.0002513297,0.00032530396,0.0011550143,0.00021197708],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008132504,0.00023431594,0.0003410736,0.000039814397,0.007493754,0.00013888344,0.00044030615,0.00019436952,0.00029318573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018261366,0.0001699318,0.00032472427,0.00050737563,0.016961563,0.00047173133,0.00024403792,0.0002589089,0.0001309271],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019801088,0.0000840384,0.0060091037,0.000009464133,0.00012626502,0.000010358157,0.00058485457,0.000050396025,0.00023063202,0.98577905,0.0064625945,0.00063342333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006262869,0.000013726678,0.0009682512,0.00007509049,0.000053151296,0.000023618602,0.011751564,0.000027458922,0.001951519,0.059918866,0.9242848,0.00030568012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017490442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070065632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96492136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037235353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002011155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9937984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160943048","doi":"10.21991/cf29418","title":"Cautious Optimism: Fraser v Canada (Attorney General)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Supreme court; Adverse possession; Watson; Adverse effect; Political science; Medicine; History","score_opus":0.020940815336034077,"score_gpt":0.2713530270220552,"score_spread":0.2504122116860211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160943048","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05061647,0.009649878,0.019910969,0.12601198,0.015061035,0.0016375401,0.0015512718,0.0008131876,0.77474767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98386425,0.0003765561,0.0023718437,0.0053227944,0.00063273666,0.00010187991,0.00024688907,0.000013193821,0.007069842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99595594,0.00021753361,0.00061174436,0.0007242207,0.0012070349,0.001283514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974977,0.0002592317,0.00018972185,0.00036019747,0.0011220381,0.0005711471],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032975676,0.0004157368,0.00047672435,0.00007183386,0.005694939,0.00022286957,0.00044479693,0.00028645684,0.0014701075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014779982,0.00041177496,0.00026336985,0.00062054297,0.0063344515,0.00065670256,0.00027144197,0.00041216757,0.00019470075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012696838,0.00007391814,0.011851486,0.000011045928,0.00014392438,0.00020674957,0.00025830665,0.0014883797,0.000097267824,0.89984494,0.0855696,0.00044167458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010008735,0.000011471912,0.0010841455,0.00007270763,0.00007119375,0.00006570501,0.010259646,0.00014663953,0.0004596141,0.0035096246,0.98265564,0.0006627155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37934133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81018716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9332478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002037293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014161754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161082780","doi":"10.21991/cf29423","title":"Comment on Fraser v Canada (AG): The More Things Change","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law; Section (typography); Constitution; Political science; Minor (academic)","score_opus":0.054828995842432934,"score_gpt":0.3091573711956767,"score_spread":0.25432837535324376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161082780","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022264002,0.00024787892,0.0031551165,0.6242914,0.0033748576,0.0005567405,0.00030366454,0.00012590074,0.36571804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8518395,0.00005801678,0.00010359949,0.14634615,0.00026741822,0.00011322599,0.00015143729,0.0000064328656,0.0011142555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971097,0.00023252139,0.00038696444,0.000409362,0.0011438956,0.0007175751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837637,0.0003492874,0.00013266929,0.0003834534,0.00047020425,0.00028804032],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056246517,0.00024091659,0.00022754022,0.00006520829,0.0040653185,0.00020757336,0.0004415864,0.00014213413,0.000717177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007048817,0.00020064274,0.0001598642,0.0004213074,0.0047221053,0.00062561606,0.00014976386,0.0003217573,0.00014267451],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014419926,0.00009652922,0.003449085,0.000006917722,0.000039372513,0.000045699107,0.0008133366,0.000043658307,0.0000022790286,0.90061253,0.09413746,0.00073872635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005502689,0.000013040087,0.0004965386,0.0000872852,0.000030253947,0.000011910281,0.016415875,0.000071740644,0.00010707418,0.016394522,0.9655351,0.00028637532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23900254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55408496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.884218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069206953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005516508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161197987","doi":"10.21991/cf29421","title":"Critical Reflections on Fraser: What Equality Are We Seeking?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Victory; Charter; Constitution; Political science; Law; Reading (process); Politics","score_opus":0.09550983661906681,"score_gpt":0.39144068646995805,"score_spread":0.29593084985089124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161197987","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0058082496,0.010358394,0.053192906,0.45716333,0.016411308,0.0012809493,0.0007151655,0.0012117699,0.45385793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98899907,0.0019073441,0.0011959457,0.0054246006,0.0006792448,0.00013242377,0.00008088441,0.000012357613,0.0015681243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956399,0.00047083577,0.0006457296,0.00085465173,0.0011913213,0.0011975556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99649596,0.0010204025,0.000190291,0.00040900195,0.0013886692,0.0004956996],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006222402,0.0004148843,0.0005051243,0.00013002325,0.008443608,0.000765725,0.0003766903,0.0004044803,0.0011160886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004899184,0.0004041968,0.00042127108,0.0008110762,0.011744844,0.0020918988,0.00025706823,0.0006389569,0.00062953855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035192345,0.00029476598,0.0048021115,0.000025884394,0.00010539917,0.00007963042,0.00088345335,0.00020691991,0.000111072535,0.9821217,0.0104229525,0.00091090845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082584086,0.000041781266,0.00066819595,0.0006020358,0.00008578278,0.000044987428,0.087287046,0.000054315173,0.0003201445,0.042257097,0.8671474,0.0006653757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00052634964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00672267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98319083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010760974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020963955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161629668","doi":"10.21991/cf29419","title":"The Elephant in the Room and Straw Men on Fire","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Privilege (computing); Charter; Law; Section (typography); Constitution; Political science; Sociology; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.02563228055779123,"score_gpt":0.2960249134474994,"score_spread":0.2703926328897082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161629668","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12129773,0.013645457,0.0010112803,0.33995017,0.002627927,0.0020473488,0.00024744385,0.00021712384,0.5189555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99569064,0.0013168541,0.000089979265,0.0017110696,0.0001896317,0.000107489184,0.00002344866,0.0000039421516,0.0008669353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975095,0.00031640136,0.00036027783,0.00038449932,0.0007133279,0.0007160403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832165,0.0009764067,0.00009978207,0.00023654557,0.00024330967,0.00012232542],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085404975,0.00022403542,0.00021619322,0.00003225651,0.006810368,0.0003458309,0.00038390968,0.00014268236,0.00007562625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013717952,0.00013484071,0.00012594216,0.00040248098,0.00704882,0.0003517867,0.00014391853,0.00036583637,0.00005945116],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020460951,0.000067635505,0.0077230195,0.0000040766586,0.000041041654,0.00004141602,0.0013325873,0.0000790933,0.000029769217,0.98014283,0.0083514685,0.0021666274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010732717,0.000044531767,0.010191442,0.00013035125,0.000040288214,0.0000779962,0.090617,0.00016862732,0.00009496277,0.029218316,0.8679406,0.00040260886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008867286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007672385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9509245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029495236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009988322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99565345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170839569","doi":"10.21991/cf29374","title":"The Constitution of Canada as Supreme Law: A New Definition","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.024256995596565196,"score_gpt":0.26270637281413517,"score_spread":0.23844937721756998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170839569","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02373245,0.0023550943,0.0024848718,0.033478387,0.0055290014,0.001750584,0.00022892193,0.00018913815,0.93025154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948686,0.00022160255,0.00039467512,0.0012302147,0.00020172834,0.000047040812,0.00005745285,0.0000065606546,0.0029721383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99644274,0.0001704928,0.0006998724,0.00044567868,0.001249451,0.0009917689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975409,0.00070513145,0.00034646588,0.0003406074,0.00070823263,0.00035868865],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060661236,0.00032216805,0.00039884288,0.00006002144,0.0051594647,0.00014723155,0.00053908443,0.00021541734,0.0006084815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012799934,0.00025418797,0.00023019832,0.00041491326,0.010786135,0.0007238335,0.00016719483,0.00031616088,0.00028336298],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006788054,0.000035165605,0.0062739183,0.000013197081,0.000107003754,0.0000059563426,0.00031413132,0.00028166888,0.00017215496,0.97659075,0.015834086,0.00030406236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012470619,0.000052582403,0.0005868599,0.00015815513,0.000059271275,0.000041815176,0.012142515,0.00004051748,0.00048866845,0.07051747,0.914203,0.00046210893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5521918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7103733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97113615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011187053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012721272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186580513","doi":"10.21991/cf29424","title":"Quebec Bill 96 - Time For a Primer on Amending the Constitution","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Healthcare Systems and Practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Charter; Constitution; Bill of rights; Law; Political science; Government (linguistics); French; State (computer science); Humanities; Linguistics","score_opus":0.09266520972867619,"score_gpt":0.42117100481086495,"score_spread":0.32850579508218875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186580513","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010624066,0.0038401498,0.17044598,0.35187936,0.023923561,0.011272218,0.0039890856,0.0011855287,0.42284006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9718118,0.0000762696,0.0012623083,0.013862198,0.001071863,0.0011660538,0.0006356437,0.000027520602,0.010086368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99448776,0.0010290861,0.0014009053,0.0009029127,0.00070132554,0.0014779842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99307084,0.0041696285,0.00068038225,0.000821969,0.00086878944,0.0003883858],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019930925,0.0005158555,0.00066274183,0.00022913658,0.007856866,0.00011955158,0.00039937653,0.000551229,0.00147207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037204234,0.0003487086,0.0003992656,0.00060423894,0.003147435,0.0008032394,0.0002180533,0.0010967988,0.0021749365],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019138823,0.00012416362,0.005657694,0.0001260149,0.00015706045,0.000031194624,0.00018192243,0.00015280132,0.00061584596,0.9006193,0.089921296,0.0022213073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021144466,0.000095529256,0.00076792296,0.0008310719,0.00010836778,0.00020406448,0.003797157,0.0005284134,0.00031917862,0.006803191,0.9839203,0.00051039504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021446033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026870891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9611877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00093595136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011311559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200060882","doi":"10.21991/cf29426","title":"Bringing the Mixed Constitution Back In","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Misrepresentation; Law; Jurisprudence; Mixing (physics); Salience (neuroscience); Law and economics; Quality (philosophy); Economics; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science; Epistemology; Physics","score_opus":0.02819535457613723,"score_gpt":0.23185336330836132,"score_spread":0.2036580087322241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200060882","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013116648,0.0013748215,0.12973438,0.030153312,0.009212754,0.00080454187,0.00013552637,0.00023298693,0.815235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910618,0.00005104086,0.00054954604,0.0062698224,0.0009318527,0.000055098342,0.00033277573,0.000012245338,0.00073580677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99722713,0.000034915673,0.00076495233,0.00062582607,0.00058557966,0.0007615844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984865,0.00020704212,0.00025566184,0.00041743598,0.0005880777,0.000045253215],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045525105,0.00036469693,0.0003559212,0.0003268068,0.0010480124,0.0005043224,0.00049255195,0.00017636939,0.0014805374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010852267,0.0003223141,0.0002515464,0.0008100907,0.0053902366,0.0017499326,0.00036572822,0.00041304142,0.0020002697],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003167168,0.0001457194,0.034946766,0.000039456892,0.000052938136,0.0001149007,0.000009144251,0.0031135634,0.00024517806,0.9505474,0.010082154,0.00067110336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025232194,0.000009506462,0.0068446836,0.00040602247,0.000085998916,0.0004801849,0.0013113853,0.012148324,0.0004959148,0.09960071,0.87529904,0.0007950013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002986208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009614852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97794515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025971187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008909231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200126117","doi":"10.21991/cf29429","title":"Checking the Other and Checking the Self: Role Morality and the Separation of Powers","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Impartiality; Separation of powers; Rule of law; Power (physics); Law; Democracy; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Legislature; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.019758544782407333,"score_gpt":0.2911096224306319,"score_spread":0.2713510776482245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200126117","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07961422,0.0335385,0.010764162,0.3149829,0.0025765998,0.0022772853,0.00026848933,0.00024298069,0.5557349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965854,0.00072603114,0.00013681558,0.002068264,0.0002186266,0.000067479414,0.00000938487,0.000004541229,0.00018344069],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779737,0.00036293318,0.00044656443,0.00034387366,0.00060692924,0.0004423253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826765,0.0007150508,0.00023017274,0.00025212127,0.000447421,0.000087591274],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015180449,0.00021590065,0.0003020074,0.00004364761,0.0060609933,0.00019555909,0.00029025372,0.00012233887,0.000065615925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008478321,0.00012325335,0.00016195467,0.00044038403,0.0238166,0.00038584266,0.00027540262,0.0002733037,0.0000108887125],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047256017,0.00003643585,0.013810682,0.0000064988744,0.00014735502,0.000002672308,0.0016892127,0.000103733415,0.00007605113,0.98266083,0.00042576622,0.0009935292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002351945,0.000024692352,0.009572145,0.00018590764,0.0003314054,0.00017169588,0.058037825,0.0006968098,0.0004274031,0.21602295,0.71169776,0.0004794816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023955198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003784125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9169712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010292681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015879091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200314862","doi":"10.21991/cf29425","title":"Introduction: Pluralism, Contestation, and the Rule of Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Rule of law; Constitutionalism; Authoritarianism; Political science; Indigenous; Law; Democracy; State (computer science); Legislature; Politics; Liberal democracy; Independence (probability theory); Political economy; Sociology","score_opus":0.018203095793587382,"score_gpt":0.2730624784854955,"score_spread":0.2548593826919081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200314862","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004477405,0.0043809945,0.008689037,0.17453262,0.0025457703,0.00042029395,0.00018706643,0.00010161815,0.8046652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926882,0.0005313099,0.00058225606,0.0027500065,0.00047773757,0.000025010082,0.000057326226,0.0000044431386,0.0028837488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837804,0.00019850548,0.00041339608,0.0002834073,0.00044753705,0.0002791129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814487,0.00039242808,0.00015854523,0.00017998816,0.0010360405,0.000088105044],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054548436,0.00014001466,0.00024062932,0.00004826334,0.001981755,0.00009849907,0.00018043214,0.000060381473,0.0004022271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012530166,0.00011118301,0.00012527942,0.00021106376,0.021073347,0.0004627843,0.00011988084,0.00014154457,0.00005594411],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053023094,0.00003924623,0.0013071512,0.000006641036,0.000084137246,0.00000719203,0.0007002969,0.000056214736,0.000065226894,0.9907634,0.0067194263,0.00019800282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014622608,0.000011206832,0.00030907308,0.000044943714,0.00003733866,0.00008026399,0.004942945,0.000031223357,0.00037284294,0.059450295,0.9331057,0.00015187169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047828606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00082406006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98821074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007937012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000748654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201355671","doi":"10.21991/cf29428","title":"Harnessing Distrust and the Power of Intercession for the Separation of Powers","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Separation of powers; Legislature; Polity; Politics; Opposition (politics); Democracy; Political science; Distrust; Loyalty; Incentive; Law and economics; Law; Universal suffrage; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.01716585480203391,"score_gpt":0.3060020321003856,"score_spread":0.2888361772983517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201355671","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034955855,0.023015132,0.55440384,0.12677985,0.007302271,0.003116438,0.000962871,0.00013659998,0.24932714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99778724,0.00037306608,0.00047881543,0.00050860085,0.0000674916,0.000042511914,0.00003555259,0.000002965141,0.0007037394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987213,0.00012167008,0.0003618801,0.00019865697,0.00034950447,0.00024700162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982931,0.0006829333,0.00022989868,0.00018447003,0.00055407884,0.00005553263],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072279916,0.000119622324,0.00021936753,0.000010845544,0.0022471563,0.00007452825,0.00021981426,0.0001415676,0.0001407861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000880189,0.00007172283,0.00022716008,0.00023740364,0.019191228,0.00033266348,0.00009362095,0.00013586142,0.0000022733623],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009337282,0.000035441957,0.0013498674,0.000019773706,0.000068226356,5.7868493e-7,0.0024895247,0.00013284014,0.0002915035,0.991713,0.0029562782,0.0008496214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004774705,0.00004918788,0.000685266,0.00053215906,0.00031170907,0.00006655603,0.20866823,0.00092650455,0.0030927735,0.10110406,0.6793785,0.00041034474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000060925428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019215206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9628314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058642367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010899273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201581927","doi":"10.21991/cf29427","title":"Are There “Sources of Resilience” When the Separation of Powers Breaks Down?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Separation of powers; Legislature; Presidential system; Politics; Political science; Independence (probability theory); Power (physics); Law and economics; Executive branch; Law; Sociology; Mathematics; Statistics; Physics","score_opus":0.02237820668620567,"score_gpt":0.28957387556443787,"score_spread":0.2671956688782322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201581927","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10942207,0.016932942,0.02387152,0.041231573,0.0032259228,0.0012122474,0.0008915054,0.00019049122,0.8030217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99761045,0.00039267333,0.0002790725,0.000712495,0.00017842895,0.000041483418,0.000031120446,0.0000052420364,0.00074901606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99702215,0.00024879046,0.00073566614,0.00041699156,0.0010282216,0.00054819265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971129,0.00045990976,0.0006509268,0.0003443068,0.0012914654,0.00014050705],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065082643,0.00025394364,0.00046201353,0.00012648305,0.0025983513,0.00006576475,0.0004941301,0.00019823802,0.0004802688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014245579,0.0002031073,0.000329506,0.00069691817,0.018993584,0.0004883615,0.00020289267,0.0002332771,0.000050299794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050374216,0.00013416546,0.065156855,0.000015359183,0.00013709479,0.000031796037,0.00052537856,0.00067070656,0.00026527097,0.9287449,0.00354289,0.0007251849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017610329,0.00009432335,0.022401875,0.00081681076,0.00031611836,0.00023209833,0.097135864,0.00008770157,0.0050411834,0.2593459,0.61186886,0.0008982245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015636561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060121045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8881884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015885025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033418918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99870014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211574431","doi":"10.21991/cf29430","title":"Constitutional Forum constitutionnel 30.4","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Chemistry; Political science","score_opus":0.029196978327043904,"score_gpt":0.2879284674742533,"score_spread":0.25873148914720945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211574431","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038002704,0.0033255168,0.23799075,0.031897794,0.010063358,0.0015582952,0.0013158598,0.0010644996,0.70898366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98122424,0.00047404884,0.005196602,0.0060846587,0.0008412169,0.00024412775,0.0007576365,0.000023717868,0.005153773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99176586,0.00041351194,0.001601177,0.0016057593,0.0021571727,0.0024565037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948416,0.00054229365,0.00046027292,0.0008689829,0.0020750777,0.001211779],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011025217,0.00089504616,0.00094906794,0.00039570537,0.009934651,0.00071027403,0.00092939497,0.0007502405,0.011536512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016717499,0.0009051053,0.0006874222,0.0012180228,0.04024593,0.0018458578,0.0005027819,0.00085469795,0.003067939],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053253832,0.0004345934,0.009112156,0.000028844,0.00025268426,0.00047964358,0.0003373055,0.0005280384,0.00016109059,0.95026886,0.03689475,0.0014487512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024733157,0.000041298626,0.00032444572,0.00030071868,0.000115332216,0.00066758785,0.008181737,0.00013711101,0.0005499151,0.09265656,0.8932558,0.0012961875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038821975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00205575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97742397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014252932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020734167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99933994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211662519","doi":"10.21991/cf29432","title":"Constitutional Forum constitutionnel 30.1","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.02909037304181237,"score_gpt":0.2875596062081105,"score_spread":0.2584692331662981,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211662519","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037529883,0.003330724,0.23662598,0.031937964,0.009936251,0.0015527452,0.001322145,0.0010598172,0.7104814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811034,0.00046864935,0.0051008053,0.006073046,0.00084132387,0.00024450186,0.00076232734,0.000023737675,0.005382214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917637,0.00041322276,0.0016046463,0.001606174,0.0021567757,0.0024554569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99484336,0.000542053,0.0004612577,0.00086998043,0.0020719995,0.0012113322],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011043242,0.0008947176,0.0009485088,0.00039555147,0.0099262465,0.0007159111,0.000931801,0.00075000606,0.01176517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016806856,0.000904847,0.0006871564,0.0012179891,0.040219106,0.0018722625,0.0005032892,0.0008554791,0.0030830132],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053121985,0.00043424487,0.0090612015,0.000028898381,0.00025281982,0.0004785418,0.00032926438,0.00052020163,0.00016492697,0.9500081,0.03722893,0.0014397457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024695203,0.000041205447,0.00032540542,0.0003011068,0.00011525522,0.00066693913,0.008076735,0.00013827061,0.00055294705,0.0918542,0.8941631,0.0012953631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003792485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020427862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9773504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014234246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020735208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99934024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211786802","doi":"10.21991/cf29431","title":"Constitutional Forum constitutionnel 30.2","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.029155984664578756,"score_gpt":0.28784226264475604,"score_spread":0.2586862779801773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211786802","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038486635,0.0033326405,0.24454977,0.031564523,0.010129061,0.0015609562,0.0013342788,0.0010832438,0.70259684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9813242,0.00047018024,0.0052890764,0.005879565,0.0008323414,0.0002445374,0.000750301,0.00002368313,0.0051861024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917793,0.0004169046,0.0015977148,0.0016057265,0.0021484515,0.002451858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948433,0.00054595084,0.00045960263,0.0008687435,0.0020716917,0.0012106947],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011063752,0.00089366816,0.0009473659,0.00039532533,0.009955866,0.00070505013,0.00092304155,0.0007493385,0.011143216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016924428,0.00090401084,0.0006857952,0.0012036778,0.040173877,0.0018204878,0.0004992712,0.00085739733,0.0030439692],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053125535,0.0004378972,0.009231858,0.000028728859,0.00025266715,0.0004727887,0.00033855418,0.0005443483,0.00016456765,0.95126426,0.035727195,0.0014839796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00251417,0.000041196356,0.00032473623,0.0003047346,0.00011506842,0.00066472247,0.008403833,0.0001471475,0.0005702082,0.08929006,0.8963195,0.0013046038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003930468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020468468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9774755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014250262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02054932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W32879796","doi":"10.21991/c94956","title":"La « crise de la prorogation » vue du Québec","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026918283214373756,"score_gpt":0.27775479685726184,"score_spread":0.25083651364288806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W32879796","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02385309,0.008555709,0.07577963,0.046026472,0.0066239536,0.0008045345,0.0003295233,0.00028518276,0.8377419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894468,0.0009558282,0.0017743809,0.0012453876,0.00066459575,0.00011053269,0.000016109096,0.000014314297,0.0057720374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99601394,0.00071918627,0.00061002024,0.00065182184,0.00079429324,0.0012107402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99777603,0.0006427278,0.00040165635,0.00028367413,0.0003561787,0.00053971546],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017581283,0.00041455106,0.00037648596,0.00011880121,0.0029111004,0.00021749966,0.0007043986,0.00070077373,0.0027453979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014552416,0.0004431592,0.0003621909,0.00085254794,0.03926504,0.0016549047,0.00018102916,0.00055795524,0.00079303765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043266555,0.00034642898,0.060810216,0.000024342215,0.00006252723,0.000085832646,0.006132633,0.00010816099,0.000018411307,0.8909598,0.035609107,0.0057993038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008309876,0.0000675249,0.007286511,0.00025751925,0.00011470902,0.00029454727,0.017557664,0.00038704806,0.00007667921,0.11795403,0.85458016,0.00059262133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17410111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.076421246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9655937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014519064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015498587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3337198","doi":"10.21991/c9jt1k","title":"TEMPTED BY RIGHTS: THE EUROPEAN UNION AND ITS NEW CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Fundamental rights; Political science; European union; International human rights law; Law and economics; Linguistic rights; Human rights; Law; Right to property; Business; International trade; Sociology","score_opus":0.04120300074272405,"score_gpt":0.2634500340916267,"score_spread":0.22224703334890267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3337198","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060309332,0.0028056602,0.07641943,0.008758655,0.0030076974,0.0019452443,0.00090171816,0.00038929837,0.845463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978038,0.000102781705,0.00023090425,0.00031394954,0.00021417165,0.000010517362,0.00009444562,0.0000071766553,0.0012222196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997769,0.0005333953,0.00043784658,0.00037554448,0.00042328527,0.0004609429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990151,0.00008188986,0.00021863355,0.00023786371,0.00019234013,0.00025418328],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010362224,0.00022498927,0.0001963131,0.00011964567,0.0025499333,0.00007850091,0.00038892886,0.00009769313,0.00042459392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013547066,0.00016861467,0.00009550275,0.0002599995,0.004586942,0.00090938056,0.00015476278,0.00023134575,0.0002633972],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038178725,0.00008782445,0.0009946487,0.000012458046,0.000044878096,0.000011516405,0.0011253824,0.0000016716019,0.0005936277,0.98115885,0.014778064,0.0011529126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015446352,0.00019408204,0.0019483174,0.00025118396,0.00022722511,0.00014206466,0.007800767,0.000053138152,0.0022867476,0.026583573,0.95838267,0.0005855832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030351218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011114542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95457524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000087516535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003799224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W34918110","doi":"10.21991/c9qt0r","title":"THE AMENDING FORMULA AND THE AGENDA FOR CHANGE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Art, Politics, and Modernism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.15160117121580427,"score_gpt":0.2773175479987673,"score_spread":0.12571637678296302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W34918110","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021626072,0.0072895554,0.10419976,0.026456412,0.011121944,0.0050402726,0.0020356807,0.00045080992,0.84124297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989893,0.00021355333,0.00024377013,0.0038921935,0.00074130454,0.00061833824,0.00006185027,0.000013548351,0.0043224026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827737,0.000045527075,0.00041923343,0.00030628694,0.00022275581,0.00072885206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987245,0.00045689507,0.000164658,0.0002993227,0.00023355748,0.000121038815],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004911869,0.00026915444,0.00024934183,0.000080349244,0.0063270573,0.00025534077,0.00031691694,0.00007647602,0.0001504891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002210931,0.00015911483,0.00022533964,0.0000073905376,0.01716623,0.0005982631,0.00015650931,0.00017644864,0.000054287677],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013498495,0.000029410447,0.00025356663,0.00001557472,0.00009473695,0.0000023562227,0.009899552,0.000001308203,0.0000020449995,0.98015696,0.007767842,0.00164169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016535992,0.000042575102,0.000041406136,0.000040624578,0.00007954662,0.000055467895,0.006235807,0.0006021349,0.00003486436,0.22018826,0.770801,0.0002246978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005472581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005283919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98773044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007210916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026932365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99496657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W35222582","doi":"10.21991/c9th43","title":"TWELVE PARADOXES OF JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.0757601109956105,"score_gpt":0.348099049291131,"score_spread":0.27233893829552047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W35222582","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010462969,0.00034624117,0.05360379,0.029078202,0.0045215245,0.0006839533,0.00024774685,0.00021956932,0.900836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945405,0.000062808314,0.0032620633,0.00091903657,0.00027545268,0.000056203695,0.00007198472,0.0000068203253,0.0008051332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779636,0.00012364626,0.00065681816,0.00032493155,0.00056277163,0.0005354554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817955,0.00024158576,0.00035462866,0.00028538748,0.0007145841,0.00022423457],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006664687,0.00019802242,0.00026690107,0.00028836427,0.0018436792,0.00006962764,0.00039478973,0.0001875116,0.0026309323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001466155,0.00020025483,0.00017052106,0.0008785416,0.009039569,0.001472039,0.00009015496,0.00034027593,0.00028389491],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056625566,0.00028778746,0.021004397,0.0000069427424,0.00005291806,0.0000042648194,0.002100437,0.0000174802,0.00007370763,0.9688024,0.006769684,0.0008233901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00109189,0.00008331167,0.0046914006,0.00011391753,0.000114680806,0.00004820563,0.02314672,0.000050071365,0.0008753179,0.22899765,0.7402005,0.0005863182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002705161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019083914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9840775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015285326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050503495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W353587074","doi":"10.21991/c9t36q","title":"ON SENATE REFORM","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Advanced Mathematical Identities","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.07118986060672176,"score_gpt":0.3008038626989468,"score_spread":0.22961400209222504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W353587074","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012130645,0.00017859053,0.23926833,0.0009802618,0.0014968043,0.0008319095,0.00019102114,0.0008107564,0.74411166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97684014,0.000020304802,0.019416977,0.0006825754,0.00008605231,0.00013746881,0.00003019496,0.000029924855,0.0027563525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99704814,0.000047863865,0.0008011982,0.00057276635,0.00065125857,0.0008787868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812084,0.0003074575,0.00026936876,0.00069922075,0.00030683095,0.0002962713],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032938863,0.00047601783,0.0005024389,0.0003092294,0.00088517764,0.000059202943,0.0004720556,0.00023064067,0.0011591112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012482201,0.00041361575,0.00030285394,0.00031362375,0.0044909194,0.00079427107,0.00022822228,0.00040803416,0.0013566811],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087541724,0.00033739983,0.00015203656,0.00006531964,0.000090531306,0.00006282821,0.00009115098,0.00001599501,0.00012181327,0.99402475,0.004829506,0.00012113658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009694628,0.00009303844,0.00003545579,0.0003249464,0.00006508343,0.0003295378,0.0010304527,0.00013132232,0.0033313702,0.98813164,0.0050230017,0.00053468987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030021065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005400613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9647095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005094336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004181905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W359069735","doi":"10.21991/c9rd5t","title":"THE PERSPECTIVES OF ABORIGINAL PEOPLES OF CANADA ON THE MONARCHY: REFLECTIONS ON THE OCCASION OF THE QUEEN’S GOLDEN JUBILEE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Monarchy; Federalism; Legislation; Queen (butterfly); Constitution; Treaty; Law; Political science; Constitutional monarchy; Variety (cybernetics); Politics","score_opus":0.031344353314173456,"score_gpt":0.29479694602134304,"score_spread":0.2634525927071696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W359069735","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0747739,0.00072541443,0.001538721,0.066054024,0.0024203232,0.0014917395,0.0011522596,0.000048580278,0.851795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99765426,0.00020966875,0.00007257471,0.0006357029,0.00012885412,0.00007398939,0.000005087115,0.000006702855,0.0012131311],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968635,0.00046372102,0.0006237947,0.00029610336,0.0011577446,0.00059516425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99506795,0.0028087099,0.0005485589,0.00063489197,0.0008153791,0.00012449113],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089533965,0.00025753226,0.00029240194,0.00007906487,0.0050205956,0.000029463934,0.0010812298,0.00011175975,0.00024095172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018845447,0.00012816172,0.00030701558,0.0006149492,0.029558873,0.0001497557,0.00011561542,0.00041859032,0.000007901348],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010221377,0.0001244809,0.0042210026,0.0000074968434,0.00010670358,0.0000015630297,0.0017330071,0.0002599405,0.00006583345,0.9877795,0.0055535347,0.000044731638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006732493,0.00029748824,0.007832892,0.0005824517,0.00020081749,0.000052636504,0.21685503,0.000047870246,0.0031725597,0.09546119,0.6742502,0.00057364843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14662378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22270507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9228804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047785934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023165926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W365180183","doi":"10.21991/c9fd38","title":"THE SOUNDS OF SILENCE: CHARTER APPLICATION WHEN THE LEGISLATURE DECLINES TO SPEAK","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Silence; Legislature; Charter; Political science; History; Art; Law; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.032203052359005654,"score_gpt":0.23364087852474796,"score_spread":0.2014378261657423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W365180183","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0066359956,0.0009135047,0.44542515,0.035495035,0.0060711186,0.0018456375,0.00021080038,0.00026983686,0.50313294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99223006,0.000029069388,0.00059829705,0.00517644,0.0010555215,0.00014123184,0.00008073357,0.000011274839,0.0006773798],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998016,0.000015038782,0.000604196,0.00037596858,0.00051906786,0.00046971074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828666,0.00016228686,0.00034062486,0.0004822884,0.0006893931,0.00003875849],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004442328,0.0002643509,0.00022096606,0.00015367437,0.0013693845,0.00020284017,0.00087505364,0.0001232261,0.00021947452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005040808,0.00016866822,0.0001937852,0.00031862088,0.004706719,0.00088749954,0.00025786104,0.000218391,0.0004679799],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007663918,0.000076163735,0.01468837,0.000018658238,0.000062158695,0.0000020287364,0.00007779239,0.00013274551,0.00013625527,0.9604803,0.02309459,0.0011542959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005024819,0.000020782363,0.004666184,0.00008006263,0.00007718073,0.000031505282,0.0011806887,0.0015452558,0.00018495625,0.25235176,0.73904395,0.0003151625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031095117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037231107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98559403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060584873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023592042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W36673133","doi":"10.21991/c9gd4z","title":"SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND THE SAME OLD CONSTITUTION*","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Politics; Law; Political science; Constitution; Political question; Institution; Same sex; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.03515265728374515,"score_gpt":0.26173373985162673,"score_spread":0.2265810825678816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W36673133","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005829686,0.0053912564,0.020848082,0.02620562,0.004001778,0.0019627449,0.0003422776,0.0005604778,0.9348581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884992,0.0011833527,0.0009792305,0.006236899,0.0005118461,0.00026122475,0.000038947142,0.000010982157,0.002278298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957522,0.00038325143,0.0008493686,0.0007932769,0.0009922473,0.001229619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975891,0.00066017546,0.00030539607,0.00045566473,0.00052404805,0.00046560026],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015566107,0.0005307675,0.000681015,0.00024811013,0.008347747,0.00022609149,0.00070680695,0.00033713927,0.000993106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015494399,0.0004143367,0.00036957162,0.0006677609,0.07213298,0.0009815041,0.00041572217,0.0005369548,0.00044321833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023639442,0.00011797405,0.018509898,0.00000866563,0.00020283977,0.00003890672,0.0021206813,0.000016216969,0.000013475087,0.97374964,0.0036957785,0.0012895244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004046005,0.000052185187,0.001747459,0.00015321524,0.00022758148,0.00024574384,0.020943727,0.00006431589,0.00007373885,0.5870932,0.3845106,0.0008422479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014334523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005557855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98266953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031532557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024914297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W36774033","doi":"10.21991/c9cw8c","title":"BRITAIN'S QUIET REVOLUTION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Indian History and Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"QUIET; History; Astronomy; Physics","score_opus":0.05219201986481358,"score_gpt":0.2081403837925656,"score_spread":0.15594836392775202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W36774033","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049646515,0.0010770963,0.0095774885,0.0013261496,0.0062445877,0.00056071393,0.0006493762,0.00045245542,0.9751475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99323523,0.000020317942,0.00057800557,0.0018698286,0.00080598466,0.00008184827,0.00020105657,0.000016406491,0.0031913195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977928,0.000066446,0.00056238915,0.00050563744,0.0003681043,0.00070466276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987214,0.000054006334,0.00019371494,0.0004076688,0.00038425942,0.00023890052],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024477032,0.00036686746,0.00031865985,0.00030785438,0.0026279355,0.00009807207,0.0003707081,0.0001630844,0.0073126773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009609801,0.0003711032,0.00029906965,0.00011385322,0.009210699,0.0011386988,0.00009716386,0.00033152822,0.0024011503],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009082878,0.00017439919,0.0013421733,0.000023827643,0.00007169169,0.00004143661,0.0035302101,0.000011434733,0.000023678138,0.97238594,0.022023397,0.00028100534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007184001,0.00010694036,0.00010767125,0.000095725416,0.00006060693,0.00017314444,0.001656971,0.00004417924,0.00010390289,0.12779231,0.8685937,0.0005464745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000293726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005231526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9882706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025422484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069392537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W369025018","doi":"10.21991/c93m2v","title":"SURPRISING AND DISTURBING? THE SASKATCHEWAN BOUNDARIES DECISION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Boundary (topology); Mathematics","score_opus":0.023266475210567874,"score_gpt":0.2619386591428764,"score_spread":0.23867218393230852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W369025018","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13040477,0.0062047914,0.1606892,0.059842464,0.007942296,0.0020652248,0.0015788964,0.0005084703,0.6307639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99414384,0.00009541909,0.0009944278,0.00343906,0.00018970747,0.000026829723,0.000009581854,0.0000064971023,0.0010946608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980544,0.00008738771,0.00033754113,0.00036201885,0.0004712935,0.0006873788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882215,0.00029094858,0.00014612748,0.0002805266,0.00016580164,0.00029443888],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000601604,0.00020929663,0.00020189781,0.000095351446,0.006949089,0.00037958234,0.00036585622,0.0001569655,0.00024521348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00086529163,0.00017231128,0.00011677218,0.0003274756,0.022965917,0.00070238026,0.00013129857,0.00024573068,0.00007312537],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003891696,0.000024061123,0.010547895,0.0000035595708,0.000024940113,0.00001585205,0.0037242128,0.000004102386,0.0000075540415,0.9650636,0.016654378,0.0038909395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038690466,0.00001788101,0.0046625244,0.000083581166,0.00002934228,0.00008818322,0.009109075,0.000016768421,0.000049575414,0.12499066,0.86029357,0.00027193775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059617903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19181943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8637391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024122001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003861033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99434376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3712173","doi":"10.21991/c96w96","title":"LIBERALISM, NATIONALISM, PLURALISM: POLITICAL REPRESENTATION AND NATION-BUILDING IN CANADA BEFORE AND AFTER THE QUEBEC REFERENDUM","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Nationalism; Pluralism (philosophy); Politics; Political science; Representation (politics); Liberalism; Political economy; Brexit; Sociology; Law; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; European union; International trade","score_opus":0.02369553933388606,"score_gpt":0.2420801501010491,"score_spread":0.21838461076716303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3712173","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76706356,0.0021969483,0.0015849523,0.096323185,0.004473538,0.0015865194,0.0009399331,0.00015066695,0.12568071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99640316,0.00004687216,0.00020435343,0.002118963,0.00012678378,0.00008120942,0.000042041604,0.0000056472463,0.00097098574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814,0.00012430834,0.00036254118,0.00035605088,0.000475848,0.00054128707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910635,0.00015852485,0.00009356199,0.00015674168,0.00019924481,0.00028560846],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003039979,0.00015277957,0.0001753946,0.0003650717,0.0018172796,0.00023932982,0.00017915445,0.00012221822,0.00033099006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039826345,0.00015815768,0.00005013154,0.00034035018,0.006197695,0.00082030933,0.000085991196,0.00023466567,0.000008178256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025594314,0.000013341115,0.060063507,0.0000058946453,0.000017170367,0.000032876833,0.0013888989,0.000005804087,0.0000023137177,0.93603724,0.0018365748,0.0005708033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013367953,0.00002466698,0.25248563,0.00020880195,0.00008595089,0.00026169006,0.024837874,0.00023184414,0.000018681505,0.18732595,0.5324042,0.00077792257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99588954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99986863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7487113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024714044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00965585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W37987877","doi":"10.21991/c94m3j","title":"BLACK V. CHRÉTIEN AND THE CONTROL OF THE ROYAL PREROGATIVE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Bishops; Prerogative; Irish; Law; Political science; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02540320267826208,"score_gpt":0.25683856222810253,"score_spread":0.23143535954984046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W37987877","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.096586704,0.004033856,0.023537591,0.045771778,0.0036629871,0.0052919467,0.0005165044,0.00024852203,0.8203501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980182,0.00006777725,0.00018360227,0.00072485575,0.000105015,0.00008374972,0.0000029906557,0.00000410931,0.0008096665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99793077,0.00032439787,0.0004120628,0.00028663542,0.00054746255,0.00049869454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984972,0.00044557062,0.00027497276,0.00022774686,0.00043447228,0.00012007734],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068337575,0.00021786113,0.00033263373,0.000034415505,0.003206373,0.000049808077,0.00048726538,0.00014362807,0.00020281614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013460969,0.00011916918,0.00024166268,0.00024242343,0.054571528,0.00030076914,0.00022343891,0.0002514576,0.000036485304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011435527,0.000044848108,0.029110009,0.0000072555927,0.0001435323,0.0000010620951,0.007038129,0.00009207874,0.000007886101,0.96211934,0.0011404704,0.00018103697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02699236,0.00024160263,0.11559173,0.00073404046,0.0012298002,0.00005384174,0.20166744,0.00294387,0.0010723703,0.2434256,0.40400466,0.0020427012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030127263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015423475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9014315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015151918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006450633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99809134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W388776361","doi":"10.21991/c99w8r","title":"THE AUSTRALIAN REPUBLICAN MOVEMENT AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR CANADA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Movement (music); Political science; History; Geography; Art; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.036236142378415576,"score_gpt":0.2547005056571564,"score_spread":0.21846436327874083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W388776361","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006296237,0.00465462,0.010534657,0.3143788,0.007553949,0.004359653,0.0042251544,0.00033780292,0.6476591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858582,0.00027285848,0.00023338434,0.001983954,0.00014677615,0.0003135402,0.0000477011,0.000006373967,0.011137204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984617,0.000041501335,0.00031662607,0.00031099346,0.00024684038,0.00062228943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987393,0.00015649259,0.00012488967,0.00022378734,0.00037664853,0.00037887561],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039343876,0.00013227433,0.00013449155,0.00014989928,0.009361386,0.00028680256,0.00033622523,0.0000942527,0.00023706605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005205152,0.00013869797,0.00008523957,0.00024134484,0.005648242,0.00037686565,0.00005713734,0.00012164627,0.000008857707],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001179168,0.000017670964,0.0016976265,0.0000047041103,0.000031566575,0.0000013703022,0.00016178846,0.000003186992,0.000014253922,0.90717596,0.08965939,0.0012206751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028138488,0.000014509717,0.002945456,0.000014003208,0.000026433245,0.0000103689845,0.002321492,0.0000096221265,0.000014943979,0.039061543,0.9551124,0.00018785856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78283596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99518347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.979562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012145728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012193137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W396233616","doi":"10.21991/c9694f","title":"FEARFUL SYMMETRY: CONSTITUTIONAL UNIFORMITY AND THE FEDERAL AMENDMENT PROPOSALS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Amendment; Constitutional amendment; Symmetry (geometry); Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Psychology; Physics; Politics; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.02920906674593668,"score_gpt":0.2743407333723122,"score_spread":0.2451316666263755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W396233616","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053760107,0.0014505088,0.067944124,0.018926593,0.0026521746,0.0019415491,0.0006100737,0.00040332795,0.9006956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990038,0.00032499034,0.0025829284,0.0041787317,0.00039573727,0.00019143797,0.000090637084,0.000012034518,0.002185503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99538606,0.00046832566,0.0008742013,0.00073912006,0.0011542087,0.0013780853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99714434,0.00072373514,0.00034839826,0.00046749253,0.00065165746,0.00066439493],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015479554,0.0005359549,0.0006199725,0.00024866845,0.0072298753,0.00028522973,0.0006848295,0.00031827623,0.0009893166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012763803,0.00042162184,0.00034737203,0.00058425526,0.11779523,0.0010544492,0.00033803956,0.0005907747,0.00026674813],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026127187,0.00016694579,0.015196629,0.000014457447,0.00017437906,0.00003532418,0.0005138248,0.000017625529,0.000008241087,0.97947174,0.0036563475,0.00048319533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0045284703,0.00008081725,0.00054993003,0.0001456827,0.00019265429,0.00062489975,0.011848928,0.00008190057,0.000104236424,0.1893026,0.7915321,0.0010078091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002378194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008623708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.984662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052763266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010159325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W406720517","doi":"10.21991/c9qd5h","title":"RECONCILING DUALITY AND DIVERSITY/ DUALITÉ ET DIVERSITÉ SONT-ELLES CONCILIABLES?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Duality (order theory); Humility; Madam; Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Theology; Mathematics; Anthropology; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.05614080555742295,"score_gpt":0.2528876229797651,"score_spread":0.19674681742234212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W406720517","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.080207996,0.0035259458,0.011608085,0.008970881,0.0042605433,0.0010332755,0.0012611668,0.00051631086,0.8886158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937146,0.0006647368,0.00066183525,0.001806012,0.00010242027,0.000015605461,0.000045257417,0.0000065156723,0.002983072],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99751765,0.0001989712,0.00038114662,0.00053870684,0.000573149,0.0007903919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984954,0.00017328763,0.0001774354,0.00024995208,0.00033874417,0.00056519965],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092452497,0.00023093735,0.0003155531,0.00043154627,0.008783704,0.00026932222,0.0003642128,0.00025711782,0.0013980061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006286844,0.0003037036,0.00017963976,0.00031957938,0.014492514,0.0012591658,0.00049388764,0.00029012852,0.00021082493],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004199659,0.00005780841,0.050709073,0.00001636436,0.00006439733,0.000048942304,0.003986502,0.000007735061,0.0000121621815,0.9380253,0.0063538617,0.0006758525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012997404,0.000044592158,0.0064329263,0.00011671857,0.0001275155,0.0000750364,0.024708185,0.000023862694,0.000024467801,0.045977708,0.92047775,0.00069148216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16859478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44190526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9141239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009997236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039118505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W419179756","doi":"10.21991/c99m1b","title":"CANADA'S JUDGE BORK: HAS THE COUNTER-REVOLUTION BEGUN?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.03158940162867509,"score_gpt":0.21889991255886365,"score_spread":0.18731051093018858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W419179756","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026962138,0.0034970494,0.019098517,0.0552167,0.010694291,0.0013056804,0.001416019,0.00031390082,0.9057616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894868,0.0001279656,0.00016400087,0.0037422783,0.00033263903,0.00007823919,0.00006609941,0.000009579879,0.00599236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99716884,0.00014576934,0.00046786535,0.00044151864,0.00083878514,0.00093721796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984389,0.00012303343,0.00019508654,0.00042282933,0.0004151473,0.00040499904],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006028149,0.00023955373,0.00024807587,0.00030266462,0.010604346,0.00039737643,0.00068329327,0.00020076783,0.0021437993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048129793,0.0002487601,0.0001919739,0.0005304452,0.020246139,0.00068594207,0.00010632113,0.00035768235,0.0003316655],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019285237,0.000040913736,0.0021742026,0.000004831994,0.000038688773,0.000026598858,0.00049824774,0.000018726321,0.0000064025367,0.7562392,0.24042402,0.0005089133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003846366,0.000016728298,0.0021011159,0.00004690948,0.000056664812,0.00005790706,0.003592161,0.00003275728,0.000009803922,0.009210839,0.9841519,0.00033857854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98302436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9867906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003194547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036928337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W419620066","doi":"10.21991/c9qh2d","title":"ALBERTA'S SEAT BELT LAW REINSTATED","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Seat belt; Law; Political science; Engineering; Automotive engineering","score_opus":0.03154853937705836,"score_gpt":0.26495808000631704,"score_spread":0.23340954062925867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W419620066","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021092647,0.00037550688,0.0058399644,0.016298799,0.0017427551,0.0005888976,0.00069817546,0.00020823797,0.9721384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9777746,0.00009324386,0.00064062636,0.011086393,0.00025241185,0.00006590317,0.000085576365,0.000012463717,0.00998877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971216,0.0001158493,0.00048476562,0.0005252643,0.0005809068,0.0011716158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983201,0.00017595808,0.00019068403,0.0003886672,0.00029788289,0.000626693],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003557181,0.0003089081,0.00030567223,0.00015928423,0.003238098,0.000109612534,0.0005319148,0.00028602,0.0017549585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005759218,0.00033558617,0.00023448991,0.00054281007,0.013065181,0.0010993694,0.000104957304,0.00030158416,0.0008458883],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004778671,0.00007875671,0.0023723238,0.0000064409423,0.000053317617,0.00004826006,0.0009440975,0.000022236894,0.000022116606,0.9451467,0.05085925,0.00039873907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000732884,0.00003331715,0.00040662222,0.00007936365,0.000035691508,0.000075181946,0.0010906513,0.00003056498,0.0002116783,0.06862857,0.92820907,0.00046637858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30195948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41092262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97566533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005019215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003175222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205435105","doi":"10.21991/c94h24","title":"COMMENTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.05338444324577618,"score_gpt":0.2600943855705252,"score_spread":0.20670994232474904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205435105","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011751058,0.00079079595,0.11376312,0.0015616041,0.0036207289,0.0013371911,0.0014206321,0.0015399928,0.8642149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899581,0.000020846419,0.0060441615,0.002525888,0.00014326898,0.00021132414,0.00035006742,0.000049801693,0.0006965047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99524724,0.00012485012,0.0009987623,0.0009412287,0.0008972235,0.0017906701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974423,0.00011680968,0.00035074953,0.000912335,0.00055292563,0.0006248462],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055378897,0.00068766205,0.00056177756,0.0005873601,0.0020324346,0.00010225411,0.00088128436,0.00032303898,0.0041386043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039415524,0.00069345423,0.00041869868,0.0008519832,0.010865046,0.001513258,0.0004999415,0.0005238272,0.019238858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018462002,0.00048539354,0.069783054,0.00001277936,0.00018351692,0.00009646383,0.000100312085,0.000049248913,0.0007142524,0.89107835,0.036663108,0.0006488768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006832827,0.00026151692,0.007868173,0.0003299063,0.0002893852,0.0022767494,0.0024969943,0.00090779655,0.008089935,0.12902315,0.83919746,0.002426102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019903721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016287573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97820705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052343524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014201397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206248230","doi":"10.21991/c9qx0s","title":"CONSTITUTIONAL DIALOGUES BETWEEN COURTS AND LEGISLATURES: CAN WE TALK?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Democracy; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.05817665794960814,"score_gpt":0.2739440819670126,"score_spread":0.21576742401740445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206248230","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023546599,0.0119809415,0.050081816,0.030462805,0.006384504,0.002323766,0.0029541005,0.0011552523,0.8711102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943225,0.0014169454,0.0013353731,0.0013229798,0.00090677536,0.00014004685,0.00020113503,0.000011866135,0.0003423707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954566,0.00021818165,0.0008565144,0.0009383902,0.0011232716,0.0014070459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99751645,0.0004420529,0.0003123742,0.00034245817,0.0006444581,0.00074220804],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007232045,0.00061810605,0.000715327,0.0002967747,0.0064705317,0.00019160513,0.0005820942,0.00049635605,0.00055931363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000873017,0.0006136491,0.00031205133,0.000491925,0.056172073,0.0010478208,0.0003544488,0.0005752239,0.00019699539],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059325015,0.00012657655,0.06331104,0.000013171338,0.0002374474,0.00008060516,0.0012823233,0.000010703231,0.000024377625,0.92979544,0.0027771853,0.0022817696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012903344,0.00008522332,0.005609073,0.0002594507,0.00020751082,0.00017740697,0.0052052634,0.000008035584,0.00011373963,0.45062727,0.5354221,0.0009946035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005262192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048466134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9707759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041861666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035903926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213032521","doi":"10.21991/c91t0j","title":"UNDERSTANDING INEQUALITY: A REPLY TO DALE GIBSON","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Sociology; Mathematical economics; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Economics; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.18947745164623675,"score_gpt":0.33027892637754813,"score_spread":0.14080147473131138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213032521","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005850208,0.00015122288,0.3753853,0.011007382,0.0036162692,0.0009228616,0.00026342957,0.00044878665,0.6023545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98658484,0.00004372957,0.0024504554,0.009378098,0.00036049634,0.00008578742,0.000054878237,0.00001424646,0.0010274689],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99593556,0.0002946983,0.0008194469,0.0007301455,0.0009599871,0.0012601516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979106,0.000229545,0.00023554813,0.0005543646,0.00041257197,0.0006573513],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001793435,0.00036859143,0.000446912,0.00036259936,0.0036586225,0.00016350365,0.00062720117,0.00027017487,0.0013430995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001675191,0.00038027074,0.00027739437,0.0008513746,0.005700934,0.0011560225,0.00024696265,0.00033936926,0.00070990255],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001059669,0.00016673002,0.03680932,0.000015783367,0.0000560592,0.000024339877,0.0025425628,0.000029761526,0.000046563553,0.9430438,0.016928816,0.00023024814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013219931,0.00016289308,0.0017582538,0.00021457228,0.000072845745,0.000052565185,0.028532537,0.000086453176,0.00030921033,0.26228803,0.7041414,0.001059288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004356107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032226054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98073465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013306389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002584431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225120294","doi":"10.21991/cf29438","title":"Minority Language School Boards and Personal Federalism in Canada — Recent and Ongoing Developments in Quebec","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Healthcare Systems and Practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Charter; Constitution; Law; Political science; State (computer science); Promotion (chess); Supreme court; Section (typography); Federalism; Constitutional right; Public administration; Sociology; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.039730205346704045,"score_gpt":0.35490330680627397,"score_spread":0.3151731014595699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225120294","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.935873,0.0034919942,0.00013761755,0.023978153,0.002452247,0.001526719,0.0005609286,0.000049526,0.031929832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942069,0.00016718125,0.000241823,0.0040311213,0.00008231204,0.00037695747,0.00011371293,0.000007907092,0.00077210553],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964722,0.00075381086,0.0008512028,0.0005128579,0.0005416131,0.0008683318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858993,0.00054547994,0.00024682682,0.00014836561,0.0001221078,0.00034726242],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012602536,0.00025239543,0.0003972802,0.000271489,0.0027058867,0.000039237257,0.00014077978,0.0001304938,0.00090145564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071014214,0.0002670132,0.000028723252,0.00037156316,0.0004879345,0.0005096494,0.00038312835,0.0011925532,0.000014913753],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009066582,0.000036108493,0.7545849,0.00013156478,0.000020035162,0.00015261928,0.0012884636,0.000048291146,0.000026040902,0.2372789,0.002664188,0.0036782208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033629711,0.000033661803,0.27411944,0.00035905093,0.000012800837,0.00023803607,0.09106832,0.00051103026,0.0000038332405,0.00037217606,0.6293714,0.000547289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95804715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99381524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6267072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041887974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028532898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225138630","doi":"10.21991/cf29436","title":"Covid, Courts, Communists and Common Sense","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Communism; Criticism; China; Political science; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Law; Public administration; Medicine","score_opus":0.019836790285358893,"score_gpt":0.26260559972081715,"score_spread":0.24276880943545825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225138630","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019938577,0.0027251733,0.87191975,0.041778427,0.003473341,0.0014452055,0.0009459318,0.0014505548,0.05632302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843942,0.000028389612,0.0028462564,0.012211774,0.000043584336,0.000146327,0.00013782865,0.000012975577,0.00017870241],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965796,0.00022648937,0.0006530348,0.00081362965,0.00086474384,0.00086254394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99732894,0.00068066723,0.00024128324,0.0010223883,0.00017518403,0.00055153435],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006665117,0.0004273274,0.0004480947,0.0004066101,0.0044654985,0.00046152322,0.0010977071,0.00010320719,0.00014668636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036424582,0.00048628091,0.00019335237,0.0006000371,0.0028683,0.0016499105,0.0027018795,0.00072186143,0.00006990163],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042007137,0.0001533567,0.008609687,0.00003204825,0.00005580924,0.00027190032,0.00012446812,0.0028590448,0.0001912453,0.98234576,0.0033932633,0.0019214376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036500124,0.00033422644,0.0015273654,0.00012344829,0.0000603436,0.007386937,0.0011391618,0.038843457,0.00023678731,0.12551898,0.8196187,0.0015606037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027977978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017428513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9644556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083101034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028403718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225165251","doi":"10.21991/cf29437","title":"Mandatory Covid-19 Vaccinations and the Charter","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vaccination; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Charter; Political science; Guardian; Medicine; Virology; Law","score_opus":0.021665541808261683,"score_gpt":0.29320030766476407,"score_spread":0.2715347658565024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225165251","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013227616,0.008800414,0.10157902,0.56312615,0.0055642864,0.0033081903,0.0010823802,0.00068023533,0.3026317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9804563,0.0002263805,0.00010433086,0.016423633,0.00021272851,0.0003874721,0.00008234776,0.0000068154786,0.002100008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976006,0.00038824708,0.0003820725,0.00040427633,0.00065052335,0.0005742366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851453,0.00052008434,0.00015439201,0.00028899792,0.00017870836,0.0003432727],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013521224,0.00019728011,0.0002454167,0.00019720322,0.0133999875,0.00016310676,0.0004522835,0.00008005028,0.0033608112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010606353,0.00017045473,0.00015248293,0.00049015094,0.002330917,0.00055477157,0.00034978543,0.00037156857,0.000085596475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009170555,0.00005566869,0.015822567,0.000006542568,0.000042958374,0.000021097207,0.0009869706,0.00028235794,0.000004527436,0.9318608,0.050452832,0.00037198118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029283036,0.00002364691,0.0006163411,0.000007057967,0.000050165923,0.00016256106,0.012810438,0.0001494793,0.0000019222578,0.08451374,0.8984881,0.0002482267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044276117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007553324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96722865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005286882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039575873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99755025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229666626","doi":"10.21991/cf29371","title":"De facto and de jure Crown Sovereignty: Reconciliation and Legitimation at the Supreme Court of Canada Ryan","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Law; Supreme court; Legitimacy; Political science; Legitimation; De facto; Crown (dentistry); Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.014237891509047631,"score_gpt":0.2509128879879251,"score_spread":0.23667499647887746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229666626","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74930537,0.0007187653,0.01411107,0.03249913,0.0005357694,0.0013660017,0.00081704906,0.00007251416,0.20057431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974179,0.00008341097,0.0002742633,0.00084115204,0.00005607626,0.000038749204,0.000048825055,0.000004271866,0.001235304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862456,0.00007311683,0.000281787,0.00024728727,0.00035266436,0.0004205647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902594,0.00025692183,0.00016764186,0.00017915497,0.00020144324,0.00016889787],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053980615,0.00013544018,0.00016493755,0.000043360913,0.0016541055,0.0000876207,0.00016023195,0.00012120582,0.00034994265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027464816,0.0001181666,0.00004929166,0.00014341643,0.0024965212,0.0003773685,0.00010408129,0.00014334396,0.000010939432],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019751105,0.000013592965,0.05664724,0.000015967451,0.000019857313,7.67332e-7,0.00030907968,0.000495725,0.0003845057,0.9384291,0.003246608,0.0004177959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016520844,0.000054407865,0.041533228,0.00016434114,0.000100040816,0.00014457597,0.01137343,0.0048300675,0.0012901032,0.08031553,0.8579206,0.00062162237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06452789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24856935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8581136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006756943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049135536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229767047","doi":"10.21991/c9p387","title":"McIvor v Canada and the 2010 Amendments to the Indian Act: A Half-Hearted Rememdy to Historical Injustice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Injustice; Fell; Government (linguistics); Law; Political science; Section (typography); Bill of rights; History; Geography; Human rights; Business; Philosophy; Cartography","score_opus":0.02528612958128768,"score_gpt":0.27514937967194986,"score_spread":0.24986325009066218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229767047","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09356176,0.0041655824,0.0076807076,0.8277357,0.019026084,0.005881353,0.00039752884,0.00027989247,0.041271374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98682743,0.00006642004,0.0004356011,0.0097440705,0.0006436943,0.0002868085,0.000014688985,0.0000076388915,0.0019736686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99666977,0.00026428263,0.00045671873,0.0003859914,0.0010223779,0.0012008464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978196,0.00063636655,0.00013862083,0.00030012763,0.00035147156,0.00075379136],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011151324,0.0003093447,0.00035406626,0.00007965565,0.006661458,0.00016313617,0.00052470976,0.00014521116,0.00013190016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030468297,0.00019172553,0.00011590633,0.00060509937,0.004239328,0.0005043606,0.0003690235,0.00039131494,0.00018124926],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009685425,0.000052068408,0.012688148,0.000007144879,0.000088246954,0.0000049531527,0.006719817,0.00008496262,0.000026174035,0.83947414,0.14011167,0.00064585387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085971376,0.000022036467,0.0051447735,0.000046528334,0.00008612353,0.00003097473,0.016919509,0.000012783464,0.000015035817,0.00048058564,0.9760357,0.0003461951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.632917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8069769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89326566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025996997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019672997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99847054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231168347","doi":"10.21991/c9jd5z","title":"Introduction","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Downtown; Context (archaeology); Politics; Public administration; Political science; Community organizing; Harm; Poverty; Sociology; Criminology; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.016888417376633436,"score_gpt":0.2880593842486444,"score_spread":0.271170966872011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231168347","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01955508,0.0020048907,0.034175377,0.017772788,0.020285396,0.001222631,0.000087371925,0.00048151304,0.90441495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810862,0.0012457275,0.0012443054,0.00042967428,0.0066601327,0.000021184713,0.0001596548,0.000010573678,0.009142566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968747,0.00020871362,0.000483108,0.00037258017,0.00063046714,0.0014304162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983457,0.00013123963,0.00018173129,0.00031667625,0.00044248914,0.0005821782],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011733455,0.00024667958,0.00024328796,0.00026534198,0.015872126,0.00009934258,0.00028695748,0.00028336962,0.0016836309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008103167,0.00023324341,0.00015872464,0.00052290905,0.0062816986,0.001753809,0.0000056134777,0.00028987805,0.0017924642],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017741011,0.00023255871,0.009251725,0.000011742105,0.000030273748,0.0000012757139,0.007568769,0.00003340964,0.000008105654,0.9710779,0.011501145,0.00026535912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003225885,0.000018942572,0.0003898181,0.000023269464,0.000031723528,0.000076156146,0.0061516785,0.000007851788,0.000116473966,0.007871339,0.98466456,0.00032557256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006998193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05705666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9731634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075174094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020792846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231312295","doi":"10.21991/c9mm48","title":"Editor's Note","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Cases and Commentary","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.017362347541542495,"score_gpt":0.29774056718988806,"score_spread":0.2803782196483456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231312295","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03190854,0.0021550972,0.19623065,0.17515334,0.054076914,0.002516134,0.0011008001,0.0008447681,0.5360138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878615,0.000056756006,0.0022503927,0.005309179,0.003478506,0.00006401206,0.00020056296,0.000014225426,0.0007648641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977701,0.000019416157,0.00044675585,0.00051144446,0.0005736766,0.0006786225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979376,0.00006573707,0.00023233636,0.0010590819,0.0002782061,0.00042702933],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017855946,0.00033714104,0.00041729,0.0001449763,0.0030182023,0.00023442574,0.00041148058,0.00018756386,0.0005936898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045519255,0.00030416192,0.00036296793,0.00008193583,0.005263187,0.00086569454,0.00034195656,0.00040459426,0.000688086],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022617358,0.00020387441,0.041408204,0.00003041885,0.00010289305,0.00026753618,0.00000968315,0.000049594804,0.00088689243,0.84697795,0.108162805,0.0016739677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0043013934,0.00018189193,0.008657201,0.000317941,0.00021864506,0.002069318,0.00016598831,0.0007595316,0.0011032887,0.0048214644,0.9768621,0.0005412539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020569423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006860886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95595294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028148486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013150069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232399982","doi":"10.21991/c9gt0k","title":"COMMENTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.05338444324577618,"score_gpt":0.2600943855705252,"score_spread":0.20670994232474904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232399982","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011751058,0.00079079595,0.11376312,0.0015616041,0.0036207289,0.0013371911,0.0014206321,0.0015399928,0.8642149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899581,0.000020846419,0.0060441615,0.002525888,0.00014326898,0.00021132414,0.00035006742,0.000049801693,0.0006965047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99524724,0.00012485012,0.0009987623,0.0009412287,0.0008972235,0.0017906701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974423,0.00011680968,0.00035074953,0.000912335,0.00055292563,0.0006248462],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055378897,0.00068766205,0.00056177756,0.0005873601,0.0020324346,0.00010225411,0.00088128436,0.00032303898,0.0041386043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039415524,0.00069345423,0.00041869868,0.0008519832,0.010865046,0.001513258,0.0004999415,0.0005238272,0.019238858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018462002,0.00048539354,0.069783054,0.00001277936,0.00018351692,0.00009646383,0.000100312085,0.000049248913,0.0007142524,0.89107835,0.036663108,0.0006488768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006832827,0.00026151692,0.007868173,0.0003299063,0.0002893852,0.0022767494,0.0024969943,0.00090779655,0.008089935,0.12902315,0.83919746,0.002426102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019903721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016287573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97820705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052343524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014201397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232791347","doi":"10.21991/c9nh2s","title":"COMMENTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.05338444324577618,"score_gpt":0.2600943855705252,"score_spread":0.20670994232474904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232791347","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011751058,0.00079079595,0.11376312,0.0015616041,0.0036207289,0.0013371911,0.0014206321,0.0015399928,0.8642149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899581,0.000020846419,0.0060441615,0.002525888,0.00014326898,0.00021132414,0.00035006742,0.000049801693,0.0006965047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99524724,0.00012485012,0.0009987623,0.0009412287,0.0008972235,0.0017906701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974423,0.00011680968,0.00035074953,0.000912335,0.00055292563,0.0006248462],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055378897,0.00068766205,0.00056177756,0.0005873601,0.0020324346,0.00010225411,0.00088128436,0.00032303898,0.0041386043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039415524,0.00069345423,0.00041869868,0.0008519832,0.010865046,0.001513258,0.0004999415,0.0005238272,0.019238858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018462002,0.00048539354,0.069783054,0.00001277936,0.00018351692,0.00009646383,0.000100312085,0.000049248913,0.0007142524,0.89107835,0.036663108,0.0006488768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006832827,0.00026151692,0.007868173,0.0003299063,0.0002893852,0.0022767494,0.0024969943,0.00090779655,0.008089935,0.12902315,0.83919746,0.002426102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019903721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016287573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97820705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052343524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014201397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234271340","doi":"10.21991/c9mh2g","title":"OBSERVATIONS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.09251040770982182,"score_gpt":0.25830318895183024,"score_spread":0.1657927812420084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234271340","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022839192,0.0009139025,0.21353558,0.0021355858,0.0037248165,0.0015231094,0.0018281006,0.0021759132,0.7513238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814064,0.000021100794,0.014893751,0.0017216122,0.00017164451,0.00028394157,0.00044684106,0.00004960185,0.0010051314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954433,0.00010469673,0.001036977,0.0009460125,0.00083119347,0.0016378259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972028,0.0001426042,0.0003459823,0.00093948725,0.0008048772,0.00056421664],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051131163,0.00064500625,0.00051523745,0.00060050533,0.002308548,0.000108398344,0.0008339566,0.00033039085,0.0030350767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067611254,0.0006606936,0.0004337898,0.0012381,0.010219754,0.0019640336,0.00038237093,0.0005035215,0.012414114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010407251,0.0003622974,0.09397561,0.000011361115,0.00014266306,0.000061698614,0.00010546423,0.00013121766,0.0014734847,0.8814018,0.021891853,0.00033851626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004378817,0.00019093677,0.03202195,0.00026729633,0.00030128768,0.001740873,0.0025976952,0.0015168741,0.0045367964,0.20066686,0.7494785,0.0023020925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002099667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030563507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9585672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004616632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021272686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99958444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234917865","doi":"10.21991/cf29370","title":"Wahkohtowin in Action","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metis; Indigenous; Law; Commission; Action (physics); Political science; Work (physics); Sociology; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.03714303502622718,"score_gpt":0.318395759727178,"score_spread":0.2812527247009508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234917865","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3770074,0.0012824661,0.0044143302,0.032983974,0.007635642,0.002486265,0.00012281704,0.00056203775,0.57350504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948071,0.0001877471,0.00045960833,0.0007995963,0.00020870674,0.000089626155,0.000045535355,0.000007605344,0.003394458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971631,0.00015741424,0.0004958899,0.00052491017,0.0007233517,0.0009353434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891293,0.00023426233,0.00014742877,0.00022918754,0.00026718935,0.0002090294],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056825945,0.000281052,0.0003641844,0.00020596354,0.0016051535,0.0001230707,0.00035236526,0.0002811687,0.0012039664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061420887,0.00026835303,0.00020426091,0.00062340085,0.0044284677,0.0012164037,0.00014131672,0.00038289785,0.0018380092],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032479897,0.0000788189,0.12668124,0.000011866836,0.00003148288,0.000009386367,0.000609548,0.00049329305,0.00023145894,0.8685265,0.0022404313,0.0010535099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022221892,0.000049543098,0.01745468,0.00020766219,0.00002985067,0.0000275326,0.027501076,0.00027752182,0.00018890311,0.014605751,0.93665355,0.00078174385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030616634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006773311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93441314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010861438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010991998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235167399","doi":"10.21991/cf29417","title":"Introduction","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.026382444784000644,"score_gpt":0.3017124128306336,"score_spread":0.27532996804663296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235167399","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005427863,0.0028905259,0.10947536,0.32115585,0.010292627,0.0005160821,0.00012715365,0.0005691276,0.5495454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886972,0.00027072622,0.0016835247,0.001692977,0.0016387479,0.000038421134,0.00011595202,0.000006755068,0.005855719],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975044,0.0001523033,0.00039596902,0.00055199314,0.00066533324,0.000730001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983667,0.00016085652,0.00010547206,0.00034049054,0.00072719494,0.00029927044],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049979845,0.00020481812,0.00023848169,0.00011494248,0.0029481705,0.00020519234,0.00026603657,0.00018884944,0.003132524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016516875,0.00022618729,0.00020138177,0.0005863136,0.006508083,0.0010171862,0.000120505436,0.00025627358,0.0011045845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002039685,0.00008119353,0.0029699912,0.000009004003,0.000027051266,0.00006173096,0.00014348894,0.00015989228,0.00039939044,0.9151811,0.07928452,0.0016622262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033424728,0.0000149618745,0.0001812901,0.000051064602,0.000040989802,0.00023223988,0.0055678706,0.000033070846,0.00076320465,0.030492807,0.9619915,0.00029674248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003262796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017627946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98326933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035511155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036390454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235208127","doi":"10.21991/c9jt2z","title":"Introduction","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; State (computer science); Democratic governance; Law; Liberal democracy; Public administration; Library science; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.015728353114768594,"score_gpt":0.2691221745480333,"score_spread":0.25339382143326467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235208127","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00629461,0.00062605826,0.26315367,0.24791583,0.008164682,0.0007262921,0.0003916691,0.000541404,0.47218576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98629946,0.00009801317,0.00031355093,0.000925431,0.002041075,0.000056450932,0.000010643389,0.0000062728063,0.0102491295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99753225,0.00011148128,0.00040308732,0.0004474631,0.0006225534,0.0008831893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998726,0.00020224584,0.00013805354,0.0002809468,0.00029206814,0.00036068226],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004995239,0.00019393292,0.00022405836,0.00009954757,0.0016964895,0.00008083248,0.0002940822,0.0001865998,0.0015315419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015757045,0.0001439985,0.00016041458,0.0002842889,0.0083082635,0.00094719813,0.00007319375,0.00011647435,0.0016968893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017244762,0.000043524724,0.007053933,0.0000036452088,0.000021498483,0.0000065972076,0.00003555145,0.0000059883755,0.00041195442,0.93763185,0.05155619,0.0032120524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056950067,0.000018921468,0.0006580435,0.000075879456,0.000012521206,0.000040753366,0.00029737584,0.0000048541106,0.00022868047,0.051530134,0.94629824,0.00026511165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012178457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010092407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98000485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005828187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014860325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99960315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235632106","doi":"10.21991/c9r95s","title":"Table of Contents","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Table (database); Database; Computer science","score_opus":0.05834233120001017,"score_gpt":0.2357391205611144,"score_spread":0.17739678936110423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235632106","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0051430636,0.0016397975,0.016739158,0.0019642853,0.0074325916,0.00033900337,0.0033022934,0.000057240686,0.96338254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97272503,0.000106303705,0.0005765155,0.00025441314,0.00006905358,0.000028592685,0.00003475029,0.0000067817823,0.026198562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807906,0.0000059977483,0.0007817216,0.0005406498,0.00008088721,0.0005116645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812096,0.000039415456,0.0008038473,0.00074768916,0.00015332105,0.00013473572],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037786248,0.0002173405,0.00055259716,0.0001999856,0.0017145075,0.00017981723,0.00068420375,0.00011750031,0.003458658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006078116,0.00024456574,0.00022736333,0.00008746941,0.0061439145,0.0009907746,0.00036096416,0.00012284936,0.005805652],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019346253,0.000070264054,0.10183595,0.000012639159,0.00011031948,0.0000043656596,0.000023879456,0.000090592584,0.000028154662,0.8498934,0.04781697,0.000094123694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023587882,0.000041553118,0.0072511276,0.000096101285,0.000024396664,0.000036934925,0.00080019893,0.0007632482,0.00038563344,0.08908594,0.8986269,0.00052914553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032593255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000040022896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.967582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009102605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001606905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99958515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235854323","doi":"10.21991/c9kq27","title":"Introduction","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.01920544657048155,"score_gpt":0.26909396137106384,"score_spread":0.2498885148005823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235854323","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038181706,0.0014016436,0.18684623,0.2676497,0.008275573,0.0008457035,0.00027655435,0.0008220925,0.53006434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99227065,0.00047542233,0.0005190868,0.0012476214,0.002510907,0.00010769728,0.000025756292,0.000008481764,0.0028343785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99688035,0.00013942401,0.00052132993,0.0006307043,0.0008476799,0.0009805354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983247,0.00027359533,0.00016685695,0.0002980133,0.00059712736,0.00033972578],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058637175,0.00030582992,0.00032165428,0.00023775925,0.0041520675,0.00009775651,0.00039313833,0.00022124992,0.0022880503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015297098,0.00023339663,0.00024475492,0.00055390695,0.017848317,0.0011560093,0.00015047954,0.00016876434,0.002217978],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048777612,0.00008126184,0.010619925,0.000002347145,0.000069917616,0.000012466123,0.000076576434,0.000016275833,0.00048601738,0.9340312,0.047700025,0.006855243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073193735,0.000028660332,0.0005660502,0.00007036349,0.00003409985,0.00004882789,0.0014302935,0.000002712192,0.00021294097,0.14899623,0.8474991,0.00037879669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006766635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013581285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9884525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062647794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002261745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99862397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238087880","doi":"10.21991/c9794r","title":"R. V. SEABOYER: PORNOGRAPHIC IMAGINATION AND THE SPRINGS OF RELEVANCE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Aesthetics; Art; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.02467236495083473,"score_gpt":0.2701359993706279,"score_spread":0.24546363441979316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238087880","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011781697,0.006683902,0.04195793,0.060856756,0.0014256306,0.0011906549,0.00010282328,0.00020414863,0.87579644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962737,0.0014040928,0.0012272976,0.0005745855,0.00008264519,0.000044384615,0.0000040879577,0.0000044227268,0.00038480075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984225,0.00012128983,0.0003776278,0.0002602644,0.0003847612,0.00043353476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891007,0.00027336625,0.00022042332,0.00019495514,0.0002823857,0.0001187797],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074464874,0.00016746066,0.00025793794,0.00014493907,0.0021714086,0.000029116452,0.00025831317,0.00009898881,0.000085129075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008682911,0.00012294832,0.0001408906,0.0003738509,0.03463048,0.0004847774,0.00013547875,0.00017080997,0.000022882778],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000736696,0.00003501434,0.030208431,0.0000110764695,0.0000587989,0.0000024816811,0.0020358153,0.0000028885229,0.000008074749,0.96530014,0.0013084622,0.0009551236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003763786,0.00005585227,0.021749688,0.00021506574,0.0001838851,0.00008689399,0.02704199,0.000115405615,0.00021391503,0.6444867,0.30152756,0.0005592126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020795332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074945646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.984492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057437464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006282559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239763295","doi":"10.21991/c9v37d","title":"INTRODUCTION","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025015153637015806,"score_gpt":0.22426510482315348,"score_spread":0.19924995118613767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239763295","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00074452383,0.021056678,0.02885737,0.0730948,0.04522974,0.00070171553,0.0007311537,0.0002994236,0.8292846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7428115,0.0037678701,0.0032270341,0.0035410107,0.007108446,0.00012900162,0.00023931531,0.000039312454,0.2391365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99629,0.00021016615,0.00072287454,0.00081252656,0.0006847378,0.0012796429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979653,0.000070522336,0.00028749887,0.00049305824,0.00048004524,0.0007036185],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057509844,0.00038801663,0.00041867743,0.0008760667,0.005454306,0.00034820053,0.0005220893,0.00055656175,0.031185208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043058328,0.000561281,0.00042364316,0.0011322207,0.04706754,0.00202544,0.00013385579,0.00057127234,0.0096363425],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003597698,0.00021215944,0.00065820076,0.000029020439,0.00009617821,0.00005649904,0.00087040017,0.000036340567,0.000016347201,0.7147349,0.27667594,0.0065780487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005853919,0.000064461005,0.00026401543,0.00011744021,0.00016623842,0.0002943023,0.0036519514,0.00004645483,0.000028495577,0.04972535,0.9444381,0.0006178057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12533961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24920754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.742067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002895756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007869099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241459668","doi":"10.21991/c9nt04","title":"Introduction","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Constitutional law; Sociology","score_opus":0.0167153703095397,"score_gpt":0.2599391723198297,"score_spread":0.24322380201029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241459668","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0074024787,0.0016679339,0.050216634,0.16401726,0.007178531,0.0016030055,0.00009705926,0.00081077346,0.76700634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919405,0.00022820508,0.00092696893,0.0021765842,0.002247439,0.00030192226,0.00007662432,0.000008782781,0.002092983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968505,0.0001311308,0.00055363047,0.00059626385,0.000844464,0.0010240457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815315,0.0001636396,0.00016454162,0.00028906736,0.0008444559,0.00038513384],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004137954,0.00032312606,0.00033942185,0.00024380606,0.004963839,0.0002546529,0.0004064049,0.00023463057,0.0054771765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009501029,0.0003195669,0.00023973222,0.0006823181,0.01440807,0.0015970351,0.00015608923,0.00031148898,0.005747357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000126191935,0.00009174359,0.0077901124,0.0000033648503,0.00006466433,0.0000054711786,0.00012895589,0.000103357794,0.00013869484,0.8845671,0.104459666,0.0026342457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004660453,0.000026590082,0.0012885524,0.000032650656,0.000033678192,0.00004553691,0.004948771,0.00004225566,0.00007082146,0.18060693,0.81201416,0.00042398478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004861196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012586897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.984538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046198268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019180496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244296500","doi":"10.21991/c9h66z","title":"PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1996 PLURALT CONFERENCE - SHOULD WE KEEP TALKING?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.061589044021180525,"score_gpt":0.283101541909172,"score_spread":0.2215124978879915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244296500","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058460675,0.00060676155,0.004852343,0.015206636,0.0034534638,0.0012177514,0.00018287585,0.0002905364,0.9157289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969496,0.00018680409,0.00051566784,0.00058796996,0.00017485546,0.000056303572,0.000008409398,0.000008423945,0.0015119703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997483,0.000041848187,0.0005763562,0.00041688958,0.00080876774,0.0006731481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835914,0.00007902998,0.00036493933,0.00022544776,0.00075131096,0.00022013146],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049848907,0.00026715765,0.00031085132,0.00015743484,0.0022329714,0.00009466225,0.0007058608,0.00027109313,0.00089713855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035980257,0.00021625428,0.0002946222,0.0005873695,0.010942236,0.0008785888,0.00021892232,0.00033406087,0.00006451684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039054707,0.000103682745,0.04274248,0.000018006673,0.000044052667,0.000001917747,0.0016147939,0.0000049677155,0.00043404722,0.9514476,0.0016484355,0.0019009857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001198904,0.00009735866,0.007970355,0.0005201393,0.0001374032,0.00008394962,0.0129386885,0.00015401667,0.0032483728,0.13432606,0.8386506,0.0006741605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016509269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014818403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9384889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001929162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016747155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245253311","doi":"10.21991/c9gt1z","title":"Acknowledgments","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.05387471099084247,"score_gpt":0.2457133978223868,"score_spread":0.19183868683154431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245253311","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025780008,0.0010747984,0.015987637,0.0025479847,0.011833088,0.00031662855,0.0015305731,0.000108684326,0.9640226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9395251,0.00009714799,0.0006692921,0.00055461907,0.00018173519,0.000052114458,0.000042620908,0.000009359498,0.058868002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783593,0.000006833645,0.0006710105,0.00073615287,0.00008147957,0.0006685659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821275,0.000033685556,0.0005449608,0.000897984,0.00011242531,0.0001982095],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042594588,0.0002753554,0.00046814425,0.00021990376,0.0035438805,0.0004884125,0.0008349401,0.00013868252,0.00723551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059642096,0.00031378507,0.00026465274,0.00007910261,0.005530877,0.0012768214,0.0005019768,0.00017144554,0.051238857],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000122333695,0.000065266,0.060329534,0.000007244453,0.000099589684,0.000010924378,0.000028470777,0.000047593745,0.0000059135955,0.8302856,0.10889497,0.00021262949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014352163,0.00002070509,0.0031972611,0.00004369594,0.000014633982,0.000047597834,0.00035293456,0.0005298279,0.00005483402,0.0971216,0.89668703,0.0004946935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008193837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000032275504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9369471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021949933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001876866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245681496","doi":"10.21991/c9ww81","title":"LIVING TREE?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tree (set theory); Forestry; Geography; Mathematics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.0405063158638816,"score_gpt":0.245970499325617,"score_spread":0.2054641834617354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245681496","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016209437,0.0011213401,0.1106043,0.00057741127,0.0031065259,0.0010593653,0.0007135408,0.0017557861,0.8648523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901045,0.000026886451,0.0070427014,0.0010812748,0.0002278347,0.00020893532,0.00013426603,0.00006236306,0.0011112272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994644,0.00016041147,0.0010968302,0.0011236528,0.0009509144,0.002024189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970863,0.00027756067,0.00039278108,0.0009625533,0.00061092805,0.00066987897],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008102846,0.00077801663,0.0006338921,0.00074671616,0.0021894397,0.0001342497,0.0009098139,0.00038397175,0.005678404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007025207,0.00079041213,0.0005251172,0.0008705912,0.011286307,0.0018807291,0.0005860066,0.0005937259,0.021722632],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010859117,0.00043980748,0.07446212,0.00001688903,0.00017472164,0.00010420817,0.00019877974,0.00007705682,0.0012286423,0.909359,0.0125114685,0.0013187318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0065786666,0.00054396444,0.03899705,0.0013687713,0.000704121,0.006643552,0.008355494,0.003759329,0.0056769396,0.13936283,0.7822365,0.005772755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002043648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048365898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9738951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005570047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020367303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246321866","doi":"10.21991/c9r94d","title":"COMMENTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.05338444324577618,"score_gpt":0.2600943855705252,"score_spread":0.20670994232474904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246321866","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011751058,0.00079079595,0.11376312,0.0015616041,0.0036207289,0.0013371911,0.0014206321,0.0015399928,0.8642149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899581,0.000020846419,0.0060441615,0.002525888,0.00014326898,0.00021132414,0.00035006742,0.000049801693,0.0006965047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99524724,0.00012485012,0.0009987623,0.0009412287,0.0008972235,0.0017906701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974423,0.00011680968,0.00035074953,0.000912335,0.00055292563,0.0006248462],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055378897,0.00068766205,0.00056177756,0.0005873601,0.0020324346,0.00010225411,0.00088128436,0.00032303898,0.0041386043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039415524,0.00069345423,0.00041869868,0.0008519832,0.010865046,0.001513258,0.0004999415,0.0005238272,0.019238858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018462002,0.00048539354,0.069783054,0.00001277936,0.00018351692,0.00009646383,0.000100312085,0.000049248913,0.0007142524,0.89107835,0.036663108,0.0006488768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006832827,0.00026151692,0.007868173,0.0003299063,0.0002893852,0.0022767494,0.0024969943,0.00090779655,0.008089935,0.12902315,0.83919746,0.002426102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019903721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016287573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97820705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052343524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014201397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246812994","doi":"10.21991/cf29372","title":"Introduction","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Library science; Management; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.014407567624850822,"score_gpt":0.26246307782026373,"score_spread":0.24805551019541291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246812994","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016939899,0.0015017492,0.019475512,0.06921045,0.011022683,0.0012665965,0.00013236486,0.00063110585,0.87981963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921442,0.00020780461,0.00047911642,0.0016484596,0.0017161033,0.0000746674,0.00008766502,0.000008894944,0.0036330537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99685895,0.0001231136,0.0005074526,0.0006576453,0.0009127922,0.0009400701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851424,0.00016675083,0.00016868759,0.0003313126,0.0005369528,0.0002820877],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005740956,0.0003107648,0.00037344964,0.00024657507,0.0030683437,0.00014539633,0.00040281797,0.0002367444,0.004004061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057484244,0.0003165558,0.0002599305,0.00069305405,0.008881193,0.0010431246,0.00015780074,0.0003231792,0.00589647],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047495145,0.00009043653,0.0287179,0.0000060668617,0.00007544581,0.0000078069515,0.00013969337,0.00031110403,0.00017000975,0.9429934,0.026392294,0.0010483508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069564115,0.000039413615,0.0008426755,0.000047392496,0.000035402314,0.00004636293,0.0044675563,0.00003946852,0.000080282894,0.07795307,0.9153151,0.00043765147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011228544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009179661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97520435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050112617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002352473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247081427","doi":"10.21991/c9c38f","title":"Introduction","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Period (music); Political science; Negotiation; History; Psychology; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.02911620297995309,"score_gpt":0.23406400030670765,"score_spread":0.20494779732675455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247081427","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019353897,0.00028986848,0.018591365,0.05596396,0.010877765,0.00034810472,0.00043513227,0.00030521103,0.9112532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736483,0.000012944226,0.00017024133,0.0011127735,0.0029074769,0.0000479876,0.00013298693,0.000009930628,0.021957353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981591,0.000026846039,0.0004320768,0.00045796164,0.00034246163,0.0005815369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850065,0.00004867294,0.00021041001,0.0006853712,0.00030304104,0.00025187182],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014815644,0.00027250408,0.00028461232,0.00011660912,0.005870591,0.00057898334,0.00052905077,0.00010537531,0.003141965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042960403,0.0002455976,0.0002195939,0.000025798201,0.012020358,0.0014538291,0.00017257425,0.00027154986,0.0017652425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030168336,0.000092967675,0.0010926211,0.000010861242,0.00004271015,0.000017365568,0.00009972776,0.000020341342,0.000022208747,0.9465086,0.050660565,0.001401861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005234786,0.0000436201,0.00013035239,0.000026947886,0.000030411395,0.00004963009,0.0004893227,0.00042974943,0.000021687725,0.07977204,0.918152,0.0003308135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026691452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004315496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9717129,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019407574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043866414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247227743","doi":"10.21991/cf29361","title":"Introduction","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Indigenous; Attendance; Girl; Sociology; Psychology; Visual arts; Gender studies; Art; Political science; Law; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.014932130466181014,"score_gpt":0.2898471780500747,"score_spread":0.2749150475838937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247227743","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01416456,0.00039327532,0.043399084,0.02163216,0.01512148,0.0010219655,0.00007678187,0.00045779036,0.9037329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9743817,0.0007862595,0.0015419599,0.00062193983,0.008883809,0.0000163924,0.00012647925,0.000011011742,0.013630486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99707675,0.0001824849,0.0004994244,0.0005534791,0.00062779506,0.0010600378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979612,0.00010495615,0.00018480561,0.00036693673,0.0010005101,0.0003815911],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008662866,0.00024408127,0.00023985178,0.0002908419,0.022118771,0.00014247079,0.00036415568,0.00028213667,0.0024928646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008938993,0.00023196077,0.00014182698,0.00063857785,0.015558324,0.0009777276,0.000006236694,0.0002486568,0.0026951768],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031384312,0.00012568926,0.0015231917,0.000008225441,0.000029621182,0.0000030345311,0.005931983,0.000013511321,0.00001267578,0.97426873,0.017692825,0.00035911615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038011774,0.000063497515,0.00013001767,0.00003124619,0.000025180705,0.00006337967,0.004397877,0.000025935982,0.00023640503,0.024576254,0.96975505,0.00031502135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009837304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23839365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9602171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064391055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0330783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247729909","doi":"10.21991/c9d08q","title":"COMMENTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.05338444324577618,"score_gpt":0.2600943855705252,"score_spread":0.20670994232474904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247729909","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011751058,0.00079079595,0.11376312,0.0015616041,0.0036207289,0.0013371911,0.0014206321,0.0015399928,0.8642149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899581,0.000020846419,0.0060441615,0.002525888,0.00014326898,0.00021132414,0.00035006742,0.000049801693,0.0006965047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99524724,0.00012485012,0.0009987623,0.0009412287,0.0008972235,0.0017906701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974423,0.00011680968,0.00035074953,0.000912335,0.00055292563,0.0006248462],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055378897,0.00068766205,0.00056177756,0.0005873601,0.0020324346,0.00010225411,0.00088128436,0.00032303898,0.0041386043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039415524,0.00069345423,0.00041869868,0.0008519832,0.010865046,0.001513258,0.0004999415,0.0005238272,0.019238858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018462002,0.00048539354,0.069783054,0.00001277936,0.00018351692,0.00009646383,0.000100312085,0.000049248913,0.0007142524,0.89107835,0.036663108,0.0006488768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006832827,0.00026151692,0.007868173,0.0003299063,0.0002893852,0.0022767494,0.0024969943,0.00090779655,0.008089935,0.12902315,0.83919746,0.002426102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019903721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016287573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97820705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052343524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014201397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248504228","doi":"10.21991/cf29369","title":"Jordan’s Principle: Reconciliation and the First Nations Child","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Redress; Commission; Indigenous; Political science; Welfare; Public administration; Corporate governance; Action (physics); Residential school; Economic growth; Sociology; Public relations; Law; Socioeconomics; Business","score_opus":0.010186608538138492,"score_gpt":0.26636313386418836,"score_spread":0.25617652532604984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248504228","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038480442,0.0012471755,0.0029367565,0.031467944,0.0047129528,0.002817706,0.000105661915,0.00018548752,0.9180459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99089384,0.0031853146,0.00024622193,0.00079787616,0.00041231705,0.000048885413,0.00008507734,0.00000833673,0.004322158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975632,0.00018292874,0.0005228617,0.00044531707,0.0005812101,0.00070452405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99803805,0.00068123353,0.00024943,0.00033558527,0.00048438003,0.0002113369],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001276218,0.0002304683,0.00027639428,0.00024772706,0.029094094,0.00018875356,0.00034259204,0.00022361243,0.00046606534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018567345,0.00017318345,0.00014130816,0.00053943624,0.00751454,0.0008298786,0.000012182219,0.0003048913,0.00051609054],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044628527,0.0000631441,0.009780487,0.000028731101,0.00003838224,9.117064e-7,0.006852879,0.00013350222,2.0385852e-7,0.98266613,0.00030549517,0.00008549962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016758373,0.000020947384,0.0009483692,0.00011854044,0.00003350464,0.00005785956,0.004894673,0.00016432189,0.00000953672,0.0155466795,0.976265,0.00026469294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01039321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5895639,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97595954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049185305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013294537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248688215","doi":"10.21991/c9vq2q","title":"SECTION 33 AND THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LEGISLATURES AND COURTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Constitution; Law; Political science; Section (typography); Politics; Separation of powers; Government (linguistics); Balance (ability); Business","score_opus":0.06463527563743278,"score_gpt":0.28574065324498915,"score_spread":0.22110537760755639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248688215","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.122198984,0.009930224,0.037169583,0.034815133,0.00433357,0.0021459681,0.00036058595,0.00053065195,0.78851527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975728,0.00033545552,0.00035945143,0.0007394649,0.0005830217,0.00008446933,0.000023815484,0.000005953478,0.0002956085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99786544,0.00022649634,0.00042358172,0.00042557254,0.00050629757,0.00055259076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980926,0.0010857052,0.00017219906,0.0001739107,0.00024907794,0.00022653394],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009749655,0.0002608664,0.00032715267,0.00015462264,0.006689999,0.00013697952,0.00021511596,0.00024227101,0.00007231931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016304906,0.0002024463,0.00012297592,0.00030990125,0.030413955,0.0007177589,0.0001780683,0.00039359732,0.000037642483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006773959,0.000017443677,0.30958673,0.000003948542,0.000054703916,0.0000037889477,0.00087699527,0.0000023706834,0.0000013233666,0.6880652,0.00094755465,0.00037226084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017999006,0.000031789867,0.16639608,0.000091361784,0.00015561859,0.000081293234,0.0052049714,0.000012129024,0.000007876506,0.70765483,0.11818485,0.00037927245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037753745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022728022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8753738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011833045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084899756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99460316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249856333","doi":"10.21991/c9w082","title":"COMMENTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.05338444324577618,"score_gpt":0.2600943855705252,"score_spread":0.20670994232474904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249856333","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011751058,0.00079079595,0.11376312,0.0015616041,0.0036207289,0.0013371911,0.0014206321,0.0015399928,0.8642149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899581,0.000020846419,0.0060441615,0.002525888,0.00014326898,0.00021132414,0.00035006742,0.000049801693,0.0006965047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99524724,0.00012485012,0.0009987623,0.0009412287,0.0008972235,0.0017906701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974423,0.00011680968,0.00035074953,0.000912335,0.00055292563,0.0006248462],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055378897,0.00068766205,0.00056177756,0.0005873601,0.0020324346,0.00010225411,0.00088128436,0.00032303898,0.0041386043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039415524,0.00069345423,0.00041869868,0.0008519832,0.010865046,0.001513258,0.0004999415,0.0005238272,0.019238858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018462002,0.00048539354,0.069783054,0.00001277936,0.00018351692,0.00009646383,0.000100312085,0.000049248913,0.0007142524,0.89107835,0.036663108,0.0006488768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006832827,0.00026151692,0.007868173,0.0003299063,0.0002893852,0.0022767494,0.0024969943,0.00090779655,0.008089935,0.12902315,0.83919746,0.002426102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019903721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016287573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97820705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052343524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014201397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249937940","doi":"10.21991/c9x08c","title":"COMMENTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.05338444324577618,"score_gpt":0.2600943855705252,"score_spread":0.20670994232474904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249937940","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011751058,0.00079079595,0.11376312,0.0015616041,0.0036207289,0.0013371911,0.0014206321,0.0015399928,0.8642149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899581,0.000020846419,0.0060441615,0.002525888,0.00014326898,0.00021132414,0.00035006742,0.000049801693,0.0006965047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99524724,0.00012485012,0.0009987623,0.0009412287,0.0008972235,0.0017906701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974423,0.00011680968,0.00035074953,0.000912335,0.00055292563,0.0006248462],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055378897,0.00068766205,0.00056177756,0.0005873601,0.0020324346,0.00010225411,0.00088128436,0.00032303898,0.0041386043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039415524,0.00069345423,0.00041869868,0.0008519832,0.010865046,0.001513258,0.0004999415,0.0005238272,0.019238858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018462002,0.00048539354,0.069783054,0.00001277936,0.00018351692,0.00009646383,0.000100312085,0.000049248913,0.0007142524,0.89107835,0.036663108,0.0006488768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006832827,0.00026151692,0.007868173,0.0003299063,0.0002893852,0.0022767494,0.0024969943,0.00090779655,0.008089935,0.12902315,0.83919746,0.002426102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019903721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016287573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97820705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052343524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014201397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251352435","doi":"10.21991/c94d4v","title":"TREATY FEDERALISM","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Treaty; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04308124114616622,"score_gpt":0.2861313456202399,"score_spread":0.24305010447407369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251352435","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008321514,0.00017770642,0.049926322,0.005173723,0.0028225537,0.00046011197,0.00014565745,0.00033702294,0.93263537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99217105,0.00006657999,0.0017311774,0.0014846748,0.00033533058,0.00006406659,0.00010917441,0.000007998855,0.0040299357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780315,0.00010500927,0.00041581967,0.00038998012,0.0006322925,0.0006537335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988277,0.00009397282,0.00015671997,0.0002063849,0.00045879107,0.00025643647],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039945272,0.00022716924,0.00020767654,0.00018670484,0.0028064644,0.000117913165,0.0003745899,0.00021276694,0.0022078177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034274126,0.00022978219,0.00021107595,0.0002746573,0.0049239416,0.0010135326,0.000073295974,0.00019393374,0.00087207527],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039391667,0.0001221526,0.018346135,0.000002987724,0.00004504562,0.000020660626,0.00055975677,0.00001626481,0.00003696312,0.9752148,0.0048130145,0.00078283745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011027126,0.00005201141,0.0035235272,0.000079231424,0.000049084072,0.0000744258,0.0034201182,0.000092263836,0.00055279117,0.20437284,0.7861079,0.00057306996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036823456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032909964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9838495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035657088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015284865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251909989","doi":"10.21991/c98942","title":"COMMENTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.05338444324577618,"score_gpt":0.2600943855705252,"score_spread":0.20670994232474904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251909989","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011751058,0.00079079595,0.11376312,0.0015616041,0.0036207289,0.0013371911,0.0014206321,0.0015399928,0.8642149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899581,0.000020846419,0.0060441615,0.002525888,0.00014326898,0.00021132414,0.00035006742,0.000049801693,0.0006965047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99524724,0.00012485012,0.0009987623,0.0009412287,0.0008972235,0.0017906701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974423,0.00011680968,0.00035074953,0.000912335,0.00055292563,0.0006248462],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055378897,0.00068766205,0.00056177756,0.0005873601,0.0020324346,0.00010225411,0.00088128436,0.00032303898,0.0041386043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039415524,0.00069345423,0.00041869868,0.0008519832,0.010865046,0.001513258,0.0004999415,0.0005238272,0.019238858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018462002,0.00048539354,0.069783054,0.00001277936,0.00018351692,0.00009646383,0.000100312085,0.000049248913,0.0007142524,0.89107835,0.036663108,0.0006488768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006832827,0.00026151692,0.007868173,0.0003299063,0.0002893852,0.0022767494,0.0024969943,0.00090779655,0.008089935,0.12902315,0.83919746,0.002426102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019903721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016287573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97820705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052343524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014201397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252004179","doi":"10.21991/c9f081","title":"PARADISE POSTPONED","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Paradise; Art; Art history","score_opus":0.06474103970274006,"score_gpt":0.20628190724147685,"score_spread":0.1415408675387368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252004179","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036579482,0.0020312057,0.027427746,0.00082856574,0.00636961,0.00037945592,0.0016467576,0.00019579213,0.9574629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97862333,0.00010529427,0.0019422875,0.0010197836,0.00008951487,0.00006747286,0.000066571294,0.000011772725,0.018073972],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757755,0.000011988093,0.0008336241,0.00076105195,0.000077554934,0.000738254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988455,0.00004025018,0.0003176479,0.00046454417,0.00009135025,0.00024068498],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039150467,0.00030711794,0.00049152144,0.00035316742,0.00088936853,0.00008517583,0.0004294227,0.00014776498,0.014621164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019727786,0.00034758245,0.00029363704,0.00029660712,0.0038347833,0.00080751895,0.00021140902,0.00017260831,0.036630377],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040886775,0.00012696332,0.035349324,0.0000073786573,0.000120614706,0.000017471599,0.00018424922,0.00003049299,0.0000061153296,0.91109717,0.05291885,0.000100494646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017633757,0.00006558146,0.0035958749,0.000044728687,0.000030271594,0.00013467281,0.001700121,0.00051172456,0.00012433136,0.22077562,0.7704042,0.0008494472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017013463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023403813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9749654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019273133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020062391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253039063","doi":"10.21991/c9pq25","title":"Introduction","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Political science; Library science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.015768966203594546,"score_gpt":0.2637771714862154,"score_spread":0.24800820528262082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253039063","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023387705,0.00074167043,0.18468246,0.08500734,0.0065872218,0.0005991438,0.00007218267,0.0006334591,0.71933776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918857,0.00015581933,0.0009610445,0.002215518,0.0033656787,0.00009022861,0.00007772227,0.000008692315,0.0012395731],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99684715,0.00020908836,0.00052366557,0.00061807496,0.00086267706,0.0009393662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837846,0.00023885045,0.00017191349,0.00030917994,0.0005603734,0.000341209],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008931226,0.0003132585,0.00036038234,0.0002382842,0.005322028,0.00015762384,0.00040380174,0.00022958538,0.0011043113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018310479,0.00031836238,0.00024195093,0.00063273194,0.014036451,0.00083346193,0.00014221761,0.00030178952,0.0015058392],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003165228,0.000087462366,0.006707747,0.000004157377,0.000055245342,0.0000039353476,0.00012124961,0.0002619946,0.00007422557,0.95148045,0.037537895,0.003634016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000514896,0.0000339949,0.0004697667,0.00003263889,0.000039030416,0.000036309466,0.0017890004,0.00008339194,0.00006318377,0.15971339,0.83685124,0.00037312874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011486597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016058753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98954695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038438608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014918705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253083530","doi":"10.21991/c9w09f","title":"The Challenges of Securing an Open Society","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Military and Defense Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Nova scotia; Political science; Morning; History; Medicine; Archaeology","score_opus":0.09394081541241597,"score_gpt":0.3176182329711919,"score_spread":0.22367741755877593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253083530","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0078010955,0.009826003,0.0048470544,0.0075004105,0.001819543,0.00095960015,0.00012590256,0.00016059961,0.9669598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99556124,0.0023168903,0.0013746226,0.0002768062,0.00012601978,0.000073396586,0.00000765406,0.0000055031187,0.00025788863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979538,0.00017234923,0.00043948222,0.00037421248,0.00043756145,0.0006226223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862975,0.0002578762,0.00016823501,0.0003822902,0.00037356364,0.00018826123],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012579232,0.00019779266,0.00026665087,0.000045430465,0.0054535824,0.00007046824,0.00096546573,0.00013855603,0.00016800783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036155607,0.00015550085,0.00018375118,0.00021616807,0.013791274,0.0011009077,0.00042844235,0.00018306184,0.000043385546],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060099857,0.00012254562,0.0027688225,0.000010002242,0.000106163454,0.0000033783442,0.0063346033,0.000012104152,0.000017108589,0.98722166,0.0017820925,0.0015614294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010957514,0.00020305703,0.0028966037,0.0001541874,0.00007599613,0.000034586243,0.15654813,0.00007786674,0.0002307751,0.45482665,0.38328618,0.0005702429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016319065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00783729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9877601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009401475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013172892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254543405","doi":"10.21991/c9m66w","title":"RESPECTING DEMOCRATIC ROLES","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Criticism; Political science; Democracy; Humanities; Confusion; Law; Philosophy; Politics; Psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.057470757040691926,"score_gpt":0.28611344619143725,"score_spread":0.22864268915074532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254543405","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003278244,0.01875761,0.022990229,0.014718865,0.0110653015,0.00054568576,0.0003026889,0.00028033913,0.928061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95410734,0.0014543496,0.0034209818,0.0024077005,0.0009696507,0.000047633537,0.000041808085,0.000024299221,0.037526216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956488,0.0003486982,0.0009833061,0.0007942629,0.000907469,0.0013174661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977299,0.0003219055,0.00039468054,0.00036917097,0.00074448576,0.00043984054],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008149078,0.0005506859,0.00050692324,0.0002632106,0.004059171,0.00014612787,0.0007291424,0.0003057913,0.0034230181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011094967,0.0005873354,0.000448147,0.00069325004,0.022608357,0.0015392982,0.00034480356,0.0005628068,0.0033178092],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006409434,0.00031229644,0.012948228,0.0000308877,0.00028982703,0.00011932642,0.0012578103,0.00006638739,0.000030475147,0.9543023,0.027366163,0.0032121767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009085399,0.00012919343,0.0011153391,0.00065797125,0.00017811182,0.0002704408,0.009772744,0.00027700406,0.00020666448,0.16222912,0.8234294,0.00082545856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009831723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002138963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9508291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006453419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019005119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254994774","doi":"10.21991/c90t07","title":"COMMENTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.05338444324577618,"score_gpt":0.2600943855705252,"score_spread":0.20670994232474904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254994774","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011751058,0.00079079595,0.11376312,0.0015616041,0.0036207289,0.0013371911,0.0014206321,0.0015399928,0.8642149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899581,0.000020846419,0.0060441615,0.002525888,0.00014326898,0.00021132414,0.00035006742,0.000049801693,0.0006965047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99524724,0.00012485012,0.0009987623,0.0009412287,0.0008972235,0.0017906701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974423,0.00011680968,0.00035074953,0.000912335,0.00055292563,0.0006248462],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055378897,0.00068766205,0.00056177756,0.0005873601,0.0020324346,0.00010225411,0.00088128436,0.00032303898,0.0041386043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039415524,0.00069345423,0.00041869868,0.0008519832,0.010865046,0.001513258,0.0004999415,0.0005238272,0.019238858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018462002,0.00048539354,0.069783054,0.00001277936,0.00018351692,0.00009646383,0.000100312085,0.000049248913,0.0007142524,0.89107835,0.036663108,0.0006488768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006832827,0.00026151692,0.007868173,0.0003299063,0.0002893852,0.0022767494,0.0024969943,0.00090779655,0.008089935,0.12902315,0.83919746,0.002426102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019903721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016287573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97820705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052343524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014201397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255172578","doi":"10.21991/c9vt00","title":"The Role of the Federal Court in National Security Issues: Balancing the Charter Against Anti-terrorism Measures","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; National security; Political science; Terrorism; Law; Democracy; Context (archaeology); Public administration; Politics; History","score_opus":0.03150337659570767,"score_gpt":0.2847661601787739,"score_spread":0.2532627835830662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255172578","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14285743,0.008739363,0.0027193555,0.09406155,0.0074387463,0.0031239854,0.0003417068,0.00020537782,0.7405125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99840033,0.00023886036,0.000039636598,0.00083985936,0.00020981306,0.000093766605,0.0000067796755,0.0000054251223,0.00016553591],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997038,0.00029012898,0.00055911765,0.0003137307,0.0011471459,0.00065187487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847424,0.00033067548,0.00024365456,0.0003136122,0.0005358946,0.000101949016],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018543506,0.00021730647,0.00022815901,0.00007207577,0.0043667676,0.0001325138,0.000908165,0.00015412006,0.00006378855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009705561,0.0001284328,0.00023414036,0.00038139842,0.009844953,0.0005708665,0.00018910336,0.00038989706,0.0000384001],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030294965,0.000053545686,0.062404796,0.000004866044,0.000029586068,0.0000027088697,0.0020701298,0.00007705835,0.00008062139,0.932233,0.0024836129,0.0005297926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068524334,0.000027042683,0.018898154,0.00030607963,0.00004178587,0.000052010666,0.040271416,0.0005942431,0.0010026231,0.25593704,0.6817356,0.00044877143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023191397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010611517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8555429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026163892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018372126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281671755","doi":"10.21991/cf29441","title":"Checking our Attachment to the Charter and Respecting Indigenous Legal Orders: A Framework for Charter Application to Indigenous Governments","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Charter; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0196496625573823,"score_gpt":0.3135892674726592,"score_spread":0.2939396049152769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281671755","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12399133,0.0004797424,0.77868766,0.06804114,0.00433541,0.011580783,0.0015720378,0.00034616573,0.010965737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864867,0.000014052703,0.002476389,0.0074153948,0.0006646744,0.002213908,0.00008666084,0.000021601065,0.0006206672],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961586,0.00014154357,0.00053923146,0.0007583074,0.0010787356,0.0013235655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985483,0.0001855836,0.00024197932,0.00041648568,0.00023462868,0.00037301544],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013415897,0.00033641467,0.00033036273,0.00021918393,0.017035302,0.0004015858,0.00066985487,0.00015624013,0.00009998374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002382822,0.00029449997,0.00016486696,0.0006286743,0.00076050335,0.00039264178,0.00036868025,0.00043631892,0.00009696987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012714282,0.00016126102,0.0047469595,0.000012520361,0.00008346323,0.000008872407,0.025778804,0.0011191234,0.000065120315,0.9628714,0.0016462599,0.00337908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062287174,0.00024266854,0.00046641254,0.00005390504,0.00005394763,0.000082296974,0.05081579,0.00009259882,0.00006300276,0.010808627,0.93617153,0.0005263194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025063532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063638147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9520628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014834201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002183048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281679871","doi":"10.21991/cf29444","title":"Doctrine Calling: Inherent Indigenous Jurisdiction in Vuntut Gwitchin","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Indigenous; Jurisdiction; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Chemistry; Philosophy; Sociology; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.02070468328231063,"score_gpt":0.2974262186870117,"score_spread":0.27672153540470107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281679871","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22508173,0.009617133,0.052200932,0.021878432,0.018794192,0.0059199473,0.0014474262,0.001654916,0.6634053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960883,0.000088392604,0.0005693924,0.0009241292,0.00031949166,0.00049851486,0.00017602605,0.000016158858,0.0013195513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995314,0.0004050272,0.0008448234,0.0007203512,0.0014276573,0.0012881474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985281,0.00022030015,0.00027783038,0.00040764952,0.00021529601,0.00035077965],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012868791,0.0003556603,0.00042132437,0.00062513776,0.0053257197,0.00015518357,0.0007984885,0.00020873343,0.0016967551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047698675,0.00040953205,0.00022458345,0.0014626817,0.0044226856,0.0007414319,0.00047353376,0.0009811687,0.00027895352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009596623,0.00033977474,0.048506927,0.000008824225,0.000038494876,0.00011847798,0.008206637,0.0065000495,0.00005121457,0.9333678,0.0017357025,0.0010301495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016050142,0.00010301019,0.0005850729,0.00004468568,0.00003400892,0.00007622034,0.011305125,0.00031007535,0.00005483902,0.021807741,0.9634731,0.00060112117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003865797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031248087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9617374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023700953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043302216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281692467","doi":"10.21991/cf29442","title":"Towards a Renewed Relationship: Modern Treaties & the Recognition of Indigenous Law-Making Authority","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; Law; International law; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.07279110094786197,"score_gpt":0.3283526564245615,"score_spread":0.25556155547669956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281692467","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03798473,0.003975748,0.09041413,0.05800652,0.0034747806,0.0024114342,0.002304617,0.0005008413,0.8009272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963594,0.00006531438,0.0011819622,0.00089626544,0.00018757564,0.00026349223,0.00012306686,0.000008906184,0.00091399834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99705994,0.00046932712,0.0005808324,0.0003602028,0.00088804465,0.0006416288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984344,0.0005069759,0.00036091884,0.0003088734,0.00027730575,0.000111496185],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001097694,0.00023222569,0.00031875307,0.00018778129,0.01361537,0.00006626576,0.00045006615,0.0001305275,0.00033721572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009313407,0.00019968573,0.00025252154,0.0006067852,0.0102344025,0.00042068635,0.00033198818,0.00044496698,0.00004128559],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064495216,0.00010721495,0.013785567,0.000012288692,0.00009409859,0.0000037922525,0.009659749,0.0007183628,0.000008272964,0.97102064,0.0024264758,0.0020990572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073457765,0.000068862835,0.0024877733,0.00008053188,0.00014857494,0.00008812651,0.03085758,0.00011016525,0.000018963668,0.6331566,0.3318122,0.00043603548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051456685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008682818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9583747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057380035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025949595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9924592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281715103","doi":"10.21991/cf29443","title":"Dickson v Vuntut Gwitchin First Nation, Section 25 and a Plurinational Charter","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Charter; Political science; History; Law; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.022677648802949302,"score_gpt":0.2633903208127694,"score_spread":0.2407126720098201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281715103","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04489537,0.005147997,0.09171714,0.11834946,0.022343272,0.0038968609,0.0023577812,0.0016254653,0.70966667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942484,0.000055632998,0.0005833598,0.0013264677,0.00066484016,0.00040205638,0.00021006214,0.00001396008,0.0024952379],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996491,0.00022464205,0.00053130236,0.0006554396,0.0013429709,0.00075464544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985296,0.00028621856,0.00023756221,0.0002630203,0.0003818179,0.00030177727],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009181598,0.00029714778,0.0002771587,0.0004095135,0.009692177,0.0002271933,0.00043447493,0.00017309493,0.0021084258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006925685,0.0003404145,0.00015329561,0.0007592692,0.005334734,0.0011037341,0.0003881495,0.0005470895,0.00012631429],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045290253,0.0001422988,0.015609156,0.000012238368,0.000049849983,0.000024172952,0.0039876243,0.0007132722,0.000025860965,0.969615,0.009413631,0.00036162898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011086925,0.00006741936,0.00088303786,0.000035186073,0.000035362085,0.00011165555,0.0059384597,0.0006451092,0.0000137102215,0.022741338,0.9679786,0.00044145164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009775613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012777585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95856494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010051281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017253014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281944215","doi":"10.21991/cf29440","title":"Special Issue on Dickson v. Vuntut Gwitchin First Nation, 2021 YKCA 5","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.023339500237354822,"score_gpt":0.2675515541482636,"score_spread":0.24421205391090878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281944215","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016281394,0.0005755519,0.0035321554,0.04609833,0.018310012,0.001231747,0.000659781,0.0002634663,0.9277008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97571665,0.00008754879,0.000095584895,0.0023919896,0.015207207,0.0002946771,0.00018984212,0.000017374487,0.0059991274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955815,0.00025134912,0.00070549914,0.0007328151,0.0017463034,0.0009825309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982695,0.00030519444,0.00032416475,0.0003346268,0.00041436867,0.00035212422],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010130913,0.0003666824,0.0004236513,0.0003703296,0.012601699,0.00027650758,0.0007045846,0.00019568022,0.0126483925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000986917,0.0003962098,0.00026653192,0.001084143,0.0040956554,0.0008543227,0.00029285369,0.0006050905,0.0011497922],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008612046,0.00021230734,0.0031079066,0.000012309279,0.000044874243,0.000050332517,0.0007374063,0.0018943155,0.000009006239,0.7925816,0.19948174,0.0017820365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091767625,0.00012030688,0.000115600196,0.000077441924,0.000031133673,0.000042533826,0.0074768206,0.00007230115,0.00003225718,0.018140817,0.97246605,0.0005070784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00429723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006839999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9740885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011664578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037700236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281967755","doi":"10.21991/cf29445","title":"The Paradox of Political Questions in Canadian Aboriginal Law: Why Dickson v Vuntut Gwitchin First Nation Requires Reconsideration of the Political Questions Doctrine in Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Doctrine; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.022137118956822677,"score_gpt":0.2900613215639113,"score_spread":0.2679242026070886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281967755","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.315283,0.0021230157,0.00066342985,0.58035284,0.0062904935,0.0034747722,0.002856052,0.00009236853,0.08886405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982353,0.000053868054,0.00008224685,0.0012014606,0.000087620894,0.00022394699,0.000044405577,0.000005441348,0.000065710745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961685,0.000512907,0.0008878287,0.000330947,0.0009257789,0.0011740385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978657,0.00093523983,0.00023145086,0.00025050392,0.0003924116,0.0003246885],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008636923,0.00021814955,0.00032314335,0.00017948424,0.005395794,0.000060657145,0.00046942345,0.00010750933,0.00010677682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00192537,0.00017323365,0.00013116215,0.0008014157,0.006257959,0.00040541062,0.00012454762,0.0005381422,0.0000026989296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002173877,0.000058209218,0.12460811,0.0000088800825,0.000021535518,0.000009877607,0.0002996683,0.0025102845,0.000010815003,0.87146777,0.0009355704,0.000047561465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020181534,0.00009148371,0.105035864,0.0004331708,0.000094248666,0.00010874381,0.049882684,0.0018375394,0.00016937972,0.20000997,0.63949656,0.0008221934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99836725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99986726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6829523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008004475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021020593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99644643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308531148","doi":"10.21991/cf29450","title":"Two Roads to Guantanamo: The Canadian and United States Supreme Courts’ Approaches to the Extraterritorial Application of Fundamental Rights","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Department of Defense","keywords":"Ideal (ethics); Contingency; LEAPS; Supreme court; Politics; State (computer science); Law; Nationalism; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.045400047311389406,"score_gpt":0.2736296185498066,"score_spread":0.2282295712384172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308531148","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6320862,0.0003311617,0.020751417,0.21313004,0.010079839,0.006665084,0.0052684783,0.00020207415,0.11148566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99613166,0.000002068068,0.00018530765,0.00182241,0.00045381958,0.00035392947,0.00039247557,0.000005729433,0.0006525849],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977328,0.00020212725,0.00036948276,0.00034812605,0.00083391636,0.0005135566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989324,0.00016904328,0.000117149306,0.0002456769,0.0002275424,0.0003081477],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085140346,0.00018328785,0.00016832436,0.0002818885,0.009399304,0.00019288645,0.00064928824,0.000058797395,0.0002525841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005421456,0.0001311281,0.00008461652,0.00033134883,0.0033162925,0.00021818772,0.00019027253,0.00023602536,0.000040143877],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058806858,0.00004519666,0.002049344,0.0000020824225,0.00004805173,0.0000032662294,0.0016045149,0.007676241,0.000015423047,0.9841261,0.0043074344,0.00006355577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041544603,0.00005922189,0.00046200884,0.0000123636055,0.000029759995,0.00003070657,0.0034292128,0.0011373203,0.000037197613,0.14100228,0.85317296,0.00021153627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25718936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6971638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8488655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080186967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017561042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308531174","doi":"10.21991/cf29446","title":"The Charter at Forty: Commemorating Patriation and Reflecting Upon the Promises and Perils of Human Rights","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Human rights; Politics; Political science; Multiculturalism; Constitution; Law; Hindsight bias; State (computer science); Environmental ethics","score_opus":0.023980859396261107,"score_gpt":0.2800273898718876,"score_spread":0.2560465304756265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308531174","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8005135,0.008962556,0.00092133606,0.039952338,0.004354942,0.0027315437,0.00059111626,0.0001834189,0.14178924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982328,0.00006326645,0.000031209824,0.00023315074,0.00014556534,0.00009028375,0.000025148402,0.0000036673794,0.0011749035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984872,0.00020215631,0.00033052848,0.0002310355,0.00040853862,0.00034058257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990818,0.00029571555,0.00023867947,0.00016211116,0.00012189375,0.000099787765],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010000598,0.000109559405,0.00015061212,0.0001493386,0.03587847,0.00027780692,0.00020155641,0.000057018387,0.00015248508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020180894,0.0000932086,0.00007339753,0.00022381649,0.007013395,0.00032113507,0.00020958408,0.0002218854,0.0000028803747],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024497931,0.000015034251,0.003476335,0.0000080026675,0.000025204732,0.0000025284521,0.0018828688,0.000028536795,0.00026317284,0.9894013,0.004132588,0.0007399441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005328307,0.000051981173,0.0007255669,0.000026257594,0.00004097629,0.000059018694,0.00951012,0.000092516915,0.000029734201,0.017976647,0.97078747,0.00016688425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01823479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3660404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97142464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064608216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085050624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308573791","doi":"10.21991/cf29448","title":"From Isolation to Inclusion: How the Charter Changed our Perceptions of Being and Belonging","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Inclusion (mineral); Mainstream; Identity (music); Political science; Indigenous; Constitution; Sociology; Human rights; Isolation (microbiology); Diversity (politics); Mainstreaming; Gender studies; Law; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.020641295851680227,"score_gpt":0.28352861683782804,"score_spread":0.2628873209861478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308573791","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36506864,0.0006626545,0.0585184,0.55872023,0.0034667475,0.0012302464,0.0007565435,0.00012717507,0.011449347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967593,0.000037772683,0.00046235748,0.001824828,0.0003667647,0.000113107526,0.000032870357,0.0000041264047,0.0003988587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998002,0.0001589976,0.00023699386,0.0003354967,0.00083504023,0.00043147543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920774,0.00013750735,0.00017130215,0.0001730761,0.00015289405,0.00015748135],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007142808,0.0001389151,0.00018465065,0.0001057828,0.011498679,0.00010179507,0.0004156592,0.000065637985,0.0002696939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031035815,0.0001241341,0.00010357584,0.0006443396,0.002005487,0.0004924547,0.0008400883,0.00020561527,0.000010929529],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001604646,0.00003165673,0.024080906,0.000001917809,0.000017467675,0.0000021809356,0.014429424,0.00027878842,0.0005656608,0.9538856,0.0052463114,0.0014440246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009519934,0.00011804139,0.021961885,0.00010405929,0.00007607495,0.000025769012,0.41284758,0.0012439059,0.00006724316,0.078385964,0.48359585,0.00062163844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044504493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033162565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87549967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026717235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077394786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98978823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308574186","doi":"10.21991/cf29449","title":"Isolation and Human Rights: Arendt and the Charter at Forty","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Prejudice (legal term); Civil rights; Political science; Social rights; Isolation (microbiology); Human rights; Law; Social equality; Inequality; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.020448904025077007,"score_gpt":0.27973316897356343,"score_spread":0.25928426494848644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308574186","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.118106104,0.0020951948,0.015575844,0.12778881,0.0046477183,0.0031061326,0.0014058383,0.00055967027,0.7267147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959689,0.000013006372,0.00012084147,0.0021853016,0.000359567,0.00023466878,0.00011058355,0.000007474752,0.000999706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973506,0.00033284404,0.00043600355,0.00048566863,0.0006874301,0.00070750463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878764,0.00036173352,0.00015026092,0.0002620614,0.00013333235,0.0003049693],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087302004,0.00024231708,0.0002892006,0.00016219357,0.015242719,0.00014521486,0.00029421487,0.000112484326,0.0008719316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020461083,0.00019814716,0.00013418785,0.00026611725,0.017501304,0.0005621394,0.0005478691,0.0003724244,0.000041352432],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007825248,0.000044565524,0.008212447,0.000005791289,0.000042361564,0.000008819258,0.000505233,0.000037995418,0.00003499407,0.986407,0.004558958,0.00006358672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020379524,0.000048740152,0.00066546036,0.00001791365,0.000054929744,0.00012288944,0.0013417382,0.000174868,0.0000119613715,0.46022746,0.5349961,0.00029998293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011941183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001687901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87786275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043972066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038567098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9860393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W43601898","doi":"10.21991/c90080","title":"LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE PERSONS CASE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.043017311832716065,"score_gpt":0.28871949705185274,"score_spread":0.24570218521913667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W43601898","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042336345,0.0003466328,0.027381958,0.013256778,0.0025937867,0.00091266754,0.00047487335,0.00019368128,0.9125033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99769133,0.000027911943,0.00054054783,0.00053692004,0.00012726411,0.000059664344,0.000010950854,0.000005840761,0.0009995706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982975,0.000108744134,0.00042914881,0.0002976989,0.00037033902,0.00049657817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987111,0.00010006843,0.00022080708,0.00040710976,0.00036874026,0.00019218374],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038611598,0.0001757958,0.00019504446,0.00012715145,0.0034050324,0.000048321534,0.00041536707,0.00016657305,0.0007147815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000285183,0.000147341,0.0002930229,0.0005295454,0.009623548,0.00055779616,0.0001315454,0.00021665558,0.000048430396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001459826,0.00011075733,0.026752265,0.0000046336468,0.00004012953,0.000025012056,0.001103608,0.000013945319,0.00010247629,0.96833616,0.0025353762,0.00096102245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079715403,0.000047988968,0.0073797777,0.00008448215,0.00013972986,0.0019293554,0.013132662,0.000049236474,0.00048773576,0.028951589,0.94658816,0.00041214074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050741346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065886453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.955355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017761948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021212988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W43694953","doi":"10.21991/c9gq1x","title":"POGG as a Basis for Federal Jurisdiction over Public Health Surveillance","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Public Health Policies and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public health; Jurisdiction; Public health surveillance; Environmental health; Public relations; Political science; Medicine; Business; Pathology; Law","score_opus":0.10983153204322824,"score_gpt":0.40649184085709583,"score_spread":0.2966603088138676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W43694953","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049121942,0.00169594,0.3629848,0.23703456,0.028852556,0.008876073,0.0031576303,0.0015302198,0.30674627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95489436,0.00019980171,0.0022335788,0.037322532,0.0010370923,0.001640213,0.0006787635,0.000035233337,0.0019584266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941838,0.00045014653,0.0015453151,0.00078111445,0.0005473487,0.002492318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959573,0.0006457558,0.0007568112,0.00059468433,0.0009805621,0.0010648542],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002189675,0.0004684825,0.0006504268,0.0005037239,0.007244344,0.00007062978,0.00042160833,0.0004878368,0.0021879661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018300775,0.00045890475,0.00030817828,0.0006516232,0.0019454642,0.0011114421,0.00018129898,0.0006893275,0.0008070481],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001001414,0.00021377791,0.068036996,0.00014288235,0.00006742877,0.0000012899628,0.0010492536,0.000006286494,0.000012044468,0.7894024,0.1396334,0.0013340731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002202312,0.00024849077,0.024534084,0.00019210982,0.000014322724,0.00006738561,0.005563302,0.0002928021,0.000008672275,0.02012231,0.9462182,0.0005360422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044885334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016890373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9057724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017107974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01787265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379535875","doi":"10.21991/cf29451","title":"The Individual is Not the Institution: The Flawed Logic of the New Brunswick Court of Queen’s Bench Decision in Acadian Society of New Brunswick v Right Honourable Prime Minister of Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Queen (butterfly); Law; Governor; Economic Justice; Prime minister; Political science; Institution; Sociology; Government (linguistics); Management; Politics; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02616770001836521,"score_gpt":0.270404926613303,"score_spread":0.2442372265949378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379535875","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2823688,0.004426079,0.010863795,0.622138,0.0087692235,0.0056039756,0.0019816665,0.00009941357,0.06374904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950064,0.00021854417,0.00013010114,0.0017155128,0.0001545727,0.000011924428,0.00001001829,0.0000063487078,0.0027466181],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99571645,0.00022109844,0.0012280928,0.0003414314,0.0016518071,0.0008411363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965841,0.0013499826,0.0008202124,0.0006296027,0.0003988679,0.00021721395],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017507897,0.00026616067,0.0004899589,0.00006128714,0.0020496335,0.00005524803,0.0015080636,0.0002619243,0.00009136955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011310001,0.00014129611,0.00040538842,0.0012068426,0.010860602,0.00030408765,0.0003261667,0.00041171766,0.0000086532245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043374257,0.00003666672,0.02412034,0.000021879934,0.00008345128,0.0000012998274,0.0009414699,0.00055359694,0.000042225325,0.901395,0.07243856,0.00032213592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001670162,0.000058862355,0.11459277,0.0006677974,0.00009794778,0.000021682585,0.0057123355,0.00029750643,0.0027792857,0.046589136,0.8271645,0.00034802264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7023163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.76979065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8548059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042281175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051135153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379536055","doi":"10.21991/cf29455","title":"AB v Northwest Territories: A New Low for the Doré/Loyola Framework","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal processes and jurisprudence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Political science; Appeal; Context (archaeology); Statutory law; Administrative law; Judicial review; Constitutional law; Geography","score_opus":0.024298456288510968,"score_gpt":0.32002240555033484,"score_spread":0.2957239492618239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379536055","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020501178,0.0029443656,0.82483745,0.1191935,0.015569306,0.0029511463,0.0015280716,0.0014009936,0.029525053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913021,0.00060024514,0.0013063198,0.0020657936,0.0021126717,0.00030757108,0.00018368172,0.000017276287,0.002104339],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967393,0.000058755173,0.00053121167,0.0005935727,0.00086112355,0.0012160268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99681014,0.0016395412,0.00019430678,0.00044215383,0.00049994496,0.0004139125],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079134456,0.00033224034,0.00031650712,0.0001763798,0.0060386094,0.00047826488,0.0009789323,0.0003427456,0.00025149502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027922303,0.000267425,0.00033904565,0.0013392089,0.00696144,0.0009788454,0.00019463258,0.00042176645,0.0004641423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056498084,0.000043365602,0.009221523,0.000028462384,0.0000684259,0.000012138317,0.00066846673,0.0007905966,0.00001001368,0.9493611,0.037060793,0.002678621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006598386,0.000043879278,0.0007395873,0.00022365943,0.000060827486,0.000020219602,0.005971023,0.00048591738,0.000054236778,0.11415983,0.87716526,0.00041573728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008246156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016100558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.989252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002701963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058588395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379536362","doi":"10.21991/cf29454","title":"A Minimalistic Approach to Severing the British Royal Family from Canada’s Constitution","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Monarchy; Queen (butterfly); Constitution; Constitutional monarchy; Apprehension; Law; Dove; Ancient history; History; Genealogy; Political science; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024525444266615352,"score_gpt":0.2512212553217944,"score_spread":0.22669581105517905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379536362","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06423594,0.0009684481,0.055393822,0.01828165,0.00661285,0.0018732147,0.0040624556,0.0006832715,0.84788835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99167943,0.000036377056,0.00034600814,0.003721859,0.00062609155,0.00020976497,0.00019509255,0.000010451409,0.0031749003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995909,0.000174083,0.0006084967,0.00068182417,0.0012481306,0.0013784952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980779,0.00048254337,0.00015077664,0.00037263517,0.00030574363,0.0006104006],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065046287,0.00030397697,0.00038352975,0.00007881594,0.006508144,0.00067673303,0.0007186056,0.00020373821,0.00008930902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016619362,0.00029781536,0.00017300266,0.00082402606,0.0053871386,0.0003349136,0.00024515027,0.00031835688,0.00039482117],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015695965,0.00003613495,0.0045342403,0.000008782894,0.000049402788,0.000052003066,0.00013140663,0.0022908528,0.000026788832,0.8763509,0.116023906,0.00047991404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005281932,0.000012372133,0.014281715,0.00019178528,0.000040773568,0.000043046115,0.004071715,0.0010113884,0.000010527573,0.0063204933,0.9729712,0.00051681045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9374401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8191788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9274435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010570341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009495547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379536749","doi":"10.21991/cf29453","title":"Federalism and the Paramountcy Doctrine","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Supreme court; Political science; Federalism; Law; Trilogy; Subject (documents); Constitutional law; Computer science","score_opus":0.021516869922301333,"score_gpt":0.2927423745499602,"score_spread":0.2712255046276589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379536749","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03721904,0.002815313,0.013136196,0.25634676,0.0051180907,0.002015299,0.00047579847,0.0009803933,0.6818931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918594,0.00040005744,0.000058794325,0.0023822852,0.00037226692,0.000117977426,0.00002656901,0.0000053075496,0.004777392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997615,0.00017206896,0.00038559467,0.0003453048,0.00061120774,0.00087084767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986101,0.0006140968,0.00011903035,0.00022562484,0.00016016762,0.00027099688],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010803593,0.00019388224,0.00028250008,0.00008964543,0.0038533441,0.00025673618,0.00030669666,0.0001486626,0.00012284821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013048414,0.00014067776,0.00014878144,0.00054168,0.01585518,0.00045291032,0.00016140389,0.00021468937,0.0005427149],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035402532,0.000014398746,0.004579523,0.000007417084,0.000030340188,0.000015666013,0.00017487457,0.000044943106,0.000007692085,0.97894424,0.015648948,0.00049655087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001620023,0.000008764036,0.001958864,0.000055528973,0.000019896092,0.00004746603,0.0012309258,0.00029075638,0.000007862833,0.14826128,0.8462801,0.00021856323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006711387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001973656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9546403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015707566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009438693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387080849","doi":"10.21991/cf29456","title":"Patriation and Section 35: The Role of Allan Blakeney in Securing Indigenous Rights","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Section (typography); Negotiation; Politics; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Indigenous rights; Sociology; Business; Philosophy","score_opus":0.007495786203037256,"score_gpt":0.22140704888286394,"score_spread":0.21391126267982669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387080849","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86609745,0.0030295795,0.0013528516,0.0039282693,0.003474967,0.001426261,0.000365393,0.0002936765,0.12003157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99877167,0.00036405228,0.000023278588,0.000079585785,0.00017890974,0.00003726544,0.000049221133,0.0000037324382,0.00049230695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850804,0.000103222934,0.00033439355,0.00025201734,0.0003739746,0.00042835562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993388,0.00014230926,0.00013683186,0.0001477331,0.00011362577,0.00012069067],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063895393,0.000111991554,0.00016601585,0.0007492328,0.002863534,0.0001871365,0.00019238694,0.0001587781,0.00007256808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021014379,0.000117804746,0.00008041078,0.0008307811,0.004460081,0.00066146185,0.000060722265,0.00018942932,0.000046578803],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016419284,0.000022740951,0.017453615,0.00000898673,0.000019447805,0.000008185238,0.0037300265,0.00045201258,0.00013438481,0.9763831,0.0005043774,0.0012667207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007094124,0.000027073103,0.009681479,0.00010419874,0.000031097657,0.000030196114,0.01074425,0.0002580236,0.000073254756,0.091798745,0.88627094,0.0002713582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13681354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6638657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88576657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057289656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020194622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387080944","doi":"10.21991/cf29457","title":"Patriation Paradigms: Sovereignty, Power, and Rights","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Empowerment; State (computer science); Power (physics); Political science; Politics; Corporate governance; Self-determination; Law and economics; Human rights; Popular sovereignty; Law; Political economy; Sociology; Public administration; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.025985326555644526,"score_gpt":0.30840832424303694,"score_spread":0.28242299768739243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387080944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024162075,0.0018626712,0.016399711,0.04155206,0.008670154,0.0015062692,0.000606156,0.0016722743,0.9035686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99606115,0.00054805167,0.0003488357,0.0009756836,0.0002956828,0.000057829722,0.0001742381,0.000010396807,0.00152813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99680257,0.00017639271,0.00051937916,0.00059031846,0.0008882792,0.0010230525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982694,0.0005049298,0.00018225475,0.0002959261,0.00032846455,0.00041906812],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010099699,0.0003103295,0.00032489127,0.0003831445,0.0046500373,0.00025087927,0.00033304375,0.00043138082,0.0005409129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009403282,0.00031040979,0.00018918386,0.00088712457,0.008742212,0.0010410558,0.00015764167,0.00038710237,0.0010391803],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034229764,0.00004723308,0.0060851295,0.000011545775,0.0000495245,0.000030286265,0.0010401196,0.000140806,0.00002087877,0.97668475,0.015400748,0.0004547533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008347525,0.00003661956,0.00077909854,0.00007364622,0.00003208515,0.000037801216,0.004319919,0.00021690225,0.000029707948,0.3992328,0.5940187,0.00038798174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000774003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014202802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9718991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002590662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019209983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387081316","doi":"10.21991/cf29458","title":"Is Canadian Constitutional Law Canadian?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Law; International law; Constitutional law; Political science; Comparative law; Municipal law; Public law; Warrant; Common law; Economics","score_opus":0.03660565353978708,"score_gpt":0.28707364655266465,"score_spread":0.2504679930128776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387081316","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013503119,0.0010126062,0.0021031587,0.08212509,0.0055224,0.0010201781,0.0029427763,0.0007296324,0.90319383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9786461,0.00036210226,0.00020244336,0.017353699,0.0007516787,0.00020472353,0.0005585706,0.000015958853,0.001904703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99401164,0.00015611267,0.00077759125,0.0009486213,0.0013325715,0.002773465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958563,0.00029335634,0.00015492637,0.00043805118,0.000993251,0.0022641066],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009883697,0.0005674945,0.00054200075,0.0011671063,0.015095035,0.00035798992,0.00083033374,0.000553657,0.0028350865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079443114,0.0006269477,0.00042683363,0.0022123193,0.04112337,0.0011347869,0.00017369125,0.00054560305,0.009632137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014631036,0.000032579464,0.017716624,0.0000058211645,0.00014108115,0.00018225334,0.00029829773,0.00025365062,0.000011383036,0.8778024,0.10321964,0.00032168126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006270313,0.000019563231,0.00094670116,0.00010061281,0.000056043813,0.00008494885,0.0035998228,0.00008428971,0.000025506451,0.15154034,0.8422009,0.000714274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8855285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97126776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9772958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023216035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03255103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W438974347","doi":"10.21991/c9md46","title":"STEPPING STONE OR PYRRHIC VICTORY? REFORM AND THE REFERENDUM","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Victory; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.08239641416404406,"score_gpt":0.23550377978804346,"score_spread":0.1531073656239994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W438974347","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040875585,0.0012452399,0.0029486064,0.008930853,0.0029760476,0.0007342771,0.00031532603,0.00029917702,0.97846293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99302596,0.000093078794,0.00017920023,0.0022066557,0.00060183596,0.000108116576,0.000050916286,0.000014337233,0.0037198737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978965,0.0000823578,0.00058847823,0.00046371226,0.00036528846,0.00060368655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875337,0.00019876183,0.00019708213,0.00040410357,0.00024299785,0.0002036858],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036907705,0.00037276154,0.00042391912,0.00016275478,0.0027499516,0.000182216,0.00035501888,0.00013654771,0.0019893579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016938083,0.00022053483,0.00020444483,0.000117684,0.01929395,0.0007933269,0.00024788515,0.0004406312,0.00028515118],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005863402,0.000103649436,0.00014640787,0.00002444249,0.0001384805,0.000024922141,0.0018209559,0.000002145222,0.000009609385,0.9951913,0.0012931697,0.0006586111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041597527,0.00012632493,0.000115229406,0.0001990769,0.00016072877,0.000257074,0.00894723,0.00018051398,0.00008932903,0.34106377,0.6441093,0.0005916841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036950313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015417343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98893845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018647684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048566615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99892294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391717944","doi":"10.21991/cf29462","title":"Overturning Ford","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of New South Wales","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.024098358738546686,"score_gpt":0.2906612662100572,"score_spread":0.2665629074715105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391717944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004439829,0.0042620725,0.043571644,0.019460673,0.0077166082,0.0003095112,0.00018364654,0.0006926584,0.9193634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886864,0.00013942299,0.00036259374,0.0016619549,0.0006602283,0.000038022918,0.00004300417,0.000007896035,0.008400501],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800646,0.000052149957,0.00035992416,0.00042115327,0.00031521136,0.00084506866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907666,0.00024072305,0.000040157935,0.00015936366,0.00008839569,0.00039471022],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042060265,0.00020247689,0.00021885472,0.0002012835,0.002391734,0.000246637,0.00026214376,0.00018937599,0.0018004007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033378412,0.00019989218,0.00025332352,0.00024671364,0.0062884013,0.00088976003,0.000067158464,0.0002752374,0.001983445],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010464183,0.000027033866,0.00093973195,0.000016408952,0.00004174446,0.000039996932,0.00028775076,0.000045980694,0.000026771644,0.96338487,0.03087083,0.00430841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020250793,0.00001599892,0.00003961204,0.000117348165,0.00002505437,0.000053782,0.0013800506,0.00045979494,0.000020438049,0.10112479,0.8962922,0.00026841386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004305439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004626247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98424655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053027616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025235172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99911207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391718402","doi":"10.21991/cf29460","title":"Federalism and the Notwithstanding Clause","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Dependent clause; Political science; Linguistics; Law; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.018981790985853446,"score_gpt":0.29619451181305007,"score_spread":0.2772127208271966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391718402","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018333497,0.010788043,0.11144197,0.09442809,0.004821916,0.0009458155,0.00036370175,0.0006381351,0.77473897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909127,0.00067258015,0.0005353639,0.0035731036,0.00061954616,0.00007064571,0.000038579627,0.000010873771,0.0035666167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973326,0.00022548839,0.00045978537,0.00048791996,0.0006744907,0.00081972126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99797684,0.001155344,0.00008344727,0.00023995136,0.00021715838,0.00032724795],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010237531,0.00029367924,0.00031982304,0.0001904278,0.0050387187,0.000742968,0.0003289054,0.00018889576,0.0003513961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007254266,0.00021843404,0.00022784405,0.00049511367,0.040455725,0.000824515,0.00014768237,0.00043115235,0.00020299133],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053168365,0.000017350692,0.0010289862,0.00001771159,0.00009939895,0.00004592585,0.0004410344,0.00006094299,0.000009464962,0.988513,0.008872864,0.00084018626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008482942,0.00001351575,0.00003226496,0.00016528166,0.00008685575,0.00024272036,0.0037880344,0.00040419697,0.000008580572,0.080621265,0.91346836,0.00032060023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013876957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007018803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98907936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034594192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005973707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391718414","doi":"10.21991/cf29465","title":"Weaving Section 33 into the Charter Project","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Weaving; Section (typography); Charter; Political science; Computer science; Engineering; Law; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.022622506655428528,"score_gpt":0.3215545900362177,"score_spread":0.2989320833807892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391718414","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004930888,0.011997548,0.112162665,0.056839973,0.027750019,0.0024396412,0.00025573588,0.0021172613,0.78150624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920125,0.00013912407,0.0006651354,0.0010156848,0.0017961897,0.00023030424,0.000047899808,0.0000167545,0.004076398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968037,0.00022606016,0.00049934606,0.0006461447,0.00091828394,0.0009064426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986199,0.00041306482,0.000094571886,0.00039583625,0.0002888,0.0001877979],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010967379,0.00031998794,0.00024681317,0.0003120173,0.0046510333,0.0007682683,0.00060537626,0.0002859152,0.00047988567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007355509,0.00024798393,0.00029313,0.0011803384,0.010150311,0.0014179104,0.00020051439,0.0006349364,0.0010516717],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016632308,0.000034526718,0.0013840931,0.000023476463,0.00007743102,0.000035466994,0.0129261175,0.0000667602,0.00012160199,0.9593671,0.02343439,0.0025124028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022749805,0.000027743974,0.000035324847,0.00019738493,0.00006176924,0.00005910936,0.010871567,0.0006339154,0.000083226034,0.018893505,0.9685576,0.00035138908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018178677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015142085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98708165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00074114837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037533347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391719412","doi":"10.21991/cf29463","title":"Ford Focus","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Focus (optics); Computer science; Physics; Optics","score_opus":0.025579660216631994,"score_gpt":0.29700935626768393,"score_spread":0.27142969605105194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391719412","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013121027,0.01621808,0.10681067,0.045188315,0.007906523,0.00082329253,0.00036119157,0.0013688173,0.820011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99471307,0.00072229083,0.00049283763,0.0011373436,0.001066915,0.00016271287,0.000058867907,0.000014129955,0.0016318385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964306,0.00011181206,0.0005866286,0.0007231474,0.0009948745,0.001152979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848247,0.00039759072,0.00008031266,0.0002596051,0.00038778604,0.00039224586],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006484545,0.00038880622,0.0003758907,0.0003750193,0.0045099976,0.00044002593,0.000471877,0.00028288583,0.0010710882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00062401127,0.00037354007,0.00041278696,0.0010217994,0.014536995,0.001224876,0.00019498177,0.00042175702,0.0021071343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026015141,0.00006682202,0.0026379195,0.0000137446505,0.00015391009,0.00011268999,0.00027170862,0.00006834845,0.00005403873,0.96039414,0.027147513,0.009053163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027440937,0.000025836176,0.00010204634,0.00019666727,0.0000618413,0.00008199175,0.0023657167,0.000101933845,0.00005839939,0.2942776,0.7020534,0.00040008363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023258964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032242981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.993401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059668504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046762484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391719420","doi":"10.21991/cf29466","title":"Editorial Introduction","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Energy Law and Policy","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.03827895529080743,"score_gpt":0.34684443675335475,"score_spread":0.3085654814625473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391719420","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011437734,0.0022690846,0.21347119,0.054478627,0.53566307,0.00044040493,0.00051091495,0.0008882389,0.19113468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8729292,0.000044729804,0.0006305237,0.0008777733,0.1195248,0.000062854684,0.00013192324,0.00001496011,0.005783195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949289,0.00014032026,0.0010375483,0.001085449,0.0020315237,0.0007762704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972523,0.0008112887,0.00013676823,0.0007463106,0.00071865815,0.00033466902],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016225093,0.00037649705,0.00039584085,0.0007485884,0.001157517,0.000995294,0.00076544227,0.0003341757,0.001962896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028834678,0.0002988917,0.0004236525,0.0014928593,0.0044209044,0.0017753277,0.0002482757,0.00050297566,0.0061370903],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022229928,0.000024678548,0.0003067226,0.000004027879,0.00003090639,0.000010823862,0.000014950642,0.0009417614,0.00019990007,0.5302318,0.4653936,0.0028186007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003178885,0.00003673162,0.000029712744,0.00003813973,0.000025463372,0.000266237,0.0001731103,0.0009266079,0.00028492013,0.21377781,0.7838245,0.00029885626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000070224734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008785392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87178546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000264992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023222696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391722319","doi":"10.21991/cf29461","title":"The Notwithstanding Clause and the Precedent in Ford","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Establishment Clause; Dependent clause; Political science; Law; Philosophy; First amendment; Supreme court; Sentence","score_opus":0.01674805123274219,"score_gpt":0.29944425927798124,"score_spread":0.28269620804523904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391722319","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01739062,0.01892878,0.026758246,0.11340903,0.007451781,0.001793389,0.000119480086,0.00035163388,0.81379706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99445516,0.0016709447,0.00005649603,0.00094152667,0.00024099255,0.00006211619,0.000008529105,0.0000069878233,0.0025572716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980342,0.00021920366,0.00040864784,0.0003109003,0.00051190046,0.0005151874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981848,0.0013326238,0.00006598732,0.00016780096,0.00013415774,0.000114644754],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015349878,0.0001691611,0.00015827191,0.000121684316,0.0027116816,0.0007656079,0.00037943153,0.00008503293,0.00008204763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010290182,0.000101968246,0.00012801273,0.00033391468,0.011657529,0.0006696377,0.00012942251,0.00036118977,0.00011111586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094129886,0.000013964077,0.0027867623,0.0000058921273,0.00004315042,0.000020469883,0.00034299365,0.000074512776,0.000009951773,0.9933954,0.0017602261,0.0014525497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00094396196,0.000013244046,0.0003141355,0.00020057528,0.000022318762,0.00004167658,0.0031699166,0.0019805061,0.000012693611,0.070751175,0.92238,0.00016984284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037918845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050051273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9770645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002940361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009838135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99858665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391722850","doi":"10.21991/cf29459","title":"Special Issue Foreward: The Notwithstanding Clause","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019536497854231283,"score_gpt":0.2996018085127713,"score_spread":0.28006531065854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391722850","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012614472,0.000677891,0.05772589,0.05488716,0.02045316,0.00075887755,0.00031519012,0.0004541647,0.8634662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.975603,0.00015122365,0.00028033095,0.0015226183,0.013578983,0.00006125732,0.00010246177,0.0000118906355,0.008688233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974086,0.00011114624,0.00043897415,0.00043479863,0.0009345682,0.0006718912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988105,0.0004100269,0.000088846566,0.00021287701,0.00030709297,0.00017063686],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008116522,0.00024146914,0.00018785479,0.00021511418,0.0035514832,0.0006295378,0.0004655563,0.00019422524,0.0025327404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050207553,0.00018834478,0.00025657876,0.00053640327,0.0054897675,0.0011138088,0.000101341146,0.00036836675,0.0016554191],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021883578,0.000026469279,0.0017208345,0.000009636651,0.00006491664,0.00003036175,0.0005285565,0.00017194587,0.000016860535,0.86860883,0.12634328,0.0024564143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024714798,0.000018265306,0.00010321488,0.00015340908,0.00004358537,0.000057333633,0.0026654876,0.00043562555,0.000070054135,0.0641379,0.931811,0.00025702958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005902619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023791464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9743416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006464169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022989914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391723063","doi":"10.21991/cf29464","title":"Notwithstanding Minority Rights","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Minority Rights and Languages","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Minority rights; Human rights; Law","score_opus":0.020740153340512508,"score_gpt":0.30256977484136527,"score_spread":0.2818296215008528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391723063","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055936584,0.0057162293,0.048492648,0.011058398,0.0068811188,0.0006511477,0.0003417573,0.0009960788,0.92026895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905611,0.000099399454,0.0007179633,0.00041262998,0.0009103875,0.000035682522,0.00007061078,0.000006075466,0.0071861385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972114,0.00010988133,0.00042749158,0.0005957444,0.0007564879,0.00089901406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881333,0.00028114693,0.00006591007,0.00026868857,0.00020410656,0.00036682474],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006208807,0.0002962467,0.00028181405,0.00032610723,0.0036549757,0.00054316956,0.0003808395,0.0002733954,0.002574225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021026641,0.00024652597,0.00026699333,0.0006085204,0.0072817104,0.0011273444,0.0000899239,0.0003750253,0.0008858999],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001334361,0.000049667004,0.0022808632,0.000030383015,0.00006992327,0.00016244354,0.00071201165,0.000021905296,0.000057074438,0.9732222,0.022073817,0.0013063953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002781759,0.000019608447,0.00007309612,0.00017825312,0.00005755311,0.00008876717,0.001994193,0.00023858104,0.00010987795,0.08802399,0.90854096,0.0003969358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026183026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058297236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98496747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000475954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020118183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395042016","doi":"10.21991/cf29471","title":"The Legal Status of LGBTQ+ in China: A Law and Politics Perspective","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; China; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Law; Legal status; Computer science","score_opus":0.016677630531536345,"score_gpt":0.3368973636416486,"score_spread":0.3202197331101122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395042016","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03682091,0.043777525,0.0034365233,0.023503201,0.0061174342,0.0009029642,0.0011031353,0.00019530141,0.884143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960378,0.0008174055,0.00010017882,0.0007100053,0.00028603806,0.0000707397,0.000030591746,0.000013810534,0.0019334508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972851,0.00012850149,0.0006262761,0.00050220545,0.00031977426,0.0011381025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986637,0.000408532,0.00010249653,0.0003545532,0.00019742135,0.00027327708],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036733504,0.0002799708,0.0003124921,0.00031188273,0.0011000107,0.00017686485,0.00023464167,0.00021103885,0.00013544495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026151066,0.0002291986,0.00015745273,0.00045515018,0.0093203075,0.00044996207,0.0001393139,0.0005227253,0.00014990612],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059511764,0.00010586118,0.017411513,0.00012525372,0.00012838327,0.000076681,0.0004610476,0.000028866643,0.00001777354,0.97574055,0.005394853,0.00044968756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017504006,0.00017207848,0.01736796,0.00019667718,0.000153236,0.0010060511,0.004538762,0.00032086062,0.00001636433,0.37590387,0.59808034,0.0004933936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02855369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005708718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9592169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049815676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002180365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9933758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395042052","doi":"10.21991/cf29470","title":"How Does it Feel to be a Problem? Inclusion and Exclusion and Quebec’s Bill 21","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Inclusion–exclusion principle; Sociology; Political science; Law; Gender studies; Politics","score_opus":0.020985966368786118,"score_gpt":0.28773468486640646,"score_spread":0.26674871849762033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395042052","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026109193,0.003825953,0.020886894,0.9088462,0.0029290477,0.0013265015,0.0003423474,0.0003546756,0.035379197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877309,0.0005875752,0.0009255366,0.004503695,0.00030819958,0.000073556366,0.000016200369,0.000008085064,0.0058462177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973035,0.00008809876,0.00029962003,0.00072194095,0.00086200394,0.0007248767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989013,0.00024435655,0.00008719851,0.00015860081,0.00013414909,0.00047439654],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007620362,0.00027084348,0.00026535775,0.00018912263,0.0052090664,0.00086858246,0.0002973344,0.00022420536,0.00009537481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054863445,0.00018897798,0.000103318554,0.0007232897,0.0064475983,0.0014430382,0.0007702404,0.00022269852,0.000019673635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017587156,0.000028242224,0.0027729298,0.00002956637,0.000018562958,0.000023701914,0.0040848507,0.000015045034,0.0004154823,0.95960814,0.023598421,0.009387487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028735606,0.000042449043,0.00049359736,0.00031199955,0.00002722061,0.000031579588,0.013073439,0.00015192234,0.00006973999,0.05795013,0.92718494,0.0003756466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024457466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13651587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96162176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038254942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021029904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395042089","doi":"10.21991/cf29468","title":"R v Sharma’s “Clarification” of the Section 15 Framework and its Creation of Unique Barriers for Disability-Based Equality Claims","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Mental Health Association","keywords":"Section (typography); Computer science; Sociology; Mathematical economics; Law and economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04243532506218678,"score_gpt":0.35558708865202476,"score_spread":0.313151763589838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395042089","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08128801,0.0008406538,0.7951588,0.05534963,0.005594009,0.0034329325,0.0024744319,0.00033803793,0.055523507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982491,0.000030797833,0.0007685491,0.00041267343,0.0001225277,0.00013470004,0.000087131564,0.0000068863096,0.00018762489],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978684,0.0002998821,0.0006246427,0.00037385421,0.00051657023,0.00031664883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99810576,0.000733222,0.0002094947,0.00024820672,0.0005404178,0.00016291495],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015441542,0.00017303575,0.00024093725,0.000108973894,0.0013107623,0.000096905314,0.0002610122,0.00029480955,0.00020158278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019083304,0.00014948256,0.00024378193,0.00055627216,0.0076011363,0.0005660758,0.000053263946,0.00022668568,0.0000044962317],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054032436,0.00007599653,0.008220851,0.00023336463,0.00004500238,1.472855e-7,0.00083668286,0.00043724698,0.00040842156,0.98868155,0.0004523916,0.000554304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012945588,0.00011875527,0.0055562034,0.0012523978,0.00032524666,0.000008112362,0.009661079,0.009604927,0.008504006,0.70512205,0.2578703,0.00068235793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003075925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005778884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9169611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026651207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022526195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395042680","doi":"10.21991/cf29472","title":"Comparative Constitutional Design: Northern Stagnation, Southern Innovation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic stagnation; Geography; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.06425865409382112,"score_gpt":0.3219219051417255,"score_spread":0.25766325104790433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395042680","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026096082,0.005501566,0.7199565,0.015576367,0.0052445256,0.0015091357,0.0009820246,0.0011782948,0.24744193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99393684,0.00014756426,0.0018594986,0.0011494197,0.0009425154,0.00028189857,0.0003772184,0.000015055253,0.0012899904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950627,0.00030355758,0.0010657504,0.00094398827,0.0015024455,0.0011215486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966159,0.00073476334,0.00023156851,0.0002886945,0.0018328902,0.00029618246],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012833322,0.0005692529,0.0005790594,0.0008236804,0.0055698254,0.00055802567,0.0005294188,0.0003656613,0.0010284812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008786802,0.0005600436,0.0002979477,0.002525336,0.029543962,0.001544375,0.00017193898,0.0005735193,0.001772926],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007475062,0.00014697669,0.0037363837,0.000017986884,0.00032947067,0.000060777205,0.0013929358,0.0033337802,0.0001706504,0.97847044,0.0100574065,0.0022084618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007907788,0.00007958044,0.00012578438,0.00037953147,0.00013611485,0.00011737747,0.012766409,0.0012838728,0.00011135468,0.26157278,0.7217153,0.0009211635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010156318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025120513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9913272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011196439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01060435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395048310","doi":"10.21991/cf29467","title":"Editorial Introduction","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science","score_opus":0.015231513895649548,"score_gpt":0.281960348890499,"score_spread":0.26672883499484945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395048310","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00048604727,0.0069859433,0.060792033,0.07746841,0.41595283,0.000862956,0.00030372833,0.0016192032,0.43552884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86867213,0.00048392822,0.00030852164,0.0005518916,0.12855317,0.0001182846,0.00010925093,0.000011342121,0.0011914945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965712,0.00012095297,0.00052246766,0.0007138322,0.0011634154,0.0009081287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860466,0.00025508302,0.00007573282,0.00023139354,0.00053129566,0.00030183938],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007734602,0.00033051908,0.00031244784,0.00033352862,0.0040657725,0.00043423678,0.00035475285,0.0003212491,0.0009774896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009085806,0.00032388285,0.0003086813,0.000926635,0.012451005,0.0013376372,0.00014190332,0.00047741306,0.0018247792],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024429704,0.00004086931,0.00047425393,0.000007898689,0.00007896615,0.000014019535,0.00013859224,0.00008445408,0.000063795706,0.62548774,0.37200612,0.0015788599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026799383,0.000026475798,0.000029978983,0.00009134823,0.000059728936,0.000045061017,0.0019109303,0.000057469537,0.00003434704,0.14855105,0.8485663,0.00035933292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012725564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010455257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86818606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004306006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395048323","doi":"10.21991/cf29469","title":"Abortion Rights Without Law: A Constitutional Reflection","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutional law; Abortion; Political science; Law; Reflection (computer programming); Computer science; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.023635029024650367,"score_gpt":0.3222993437780244,"score_spread":0.298664314753374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395048323","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018936906,0.004889913,0.1729125,0.008198009,0.010640996,0.0011133335,0.0003022656,0.0015010078,0.7985483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942953,0.00012785879,0.0005345967,0.0010535094,0.0016198464,0.00017864352,0.00016583492,0.000014145311,0.002010242],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99585754,0.00018367644,0.00082205905,0.00086922804,0.0012226743,0.001044798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982366,0.00018832064,0.00017115349,0.00028671778,0.0006703739,0.00044680896],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009482135,0.00043295787,0.00043783308,0.00040133198,0.005785422,0.0007972715,0.0003772981,0.00045894607,0.00077147223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003425345,0.00041113942,0.00033226845,0.0010447579,0.019634295,0.0025507347,0.00009076997,0.00053828274,0.0012497989],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005187019,0.00009386961,0.0016447748,0.000056855533,0.00009668744,0.00006645415,0.0003127353,0.00020109443,0.00025523943,0.98622584,0.010301682,0.0006929145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004586497,0.00004161944,0.000031907275,0.00046582837,0.000078967896,0.00020340715,0.00074258714,0.00028988117,0.00019173702,0.18514952,0.811854,0.000491916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067171827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009412742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99240166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009277853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005154055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403728798","doi":"10.21991/cf29477","title":"The Puzzle and Promise of Human Dignity: R v Bissonnette","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.030429458967036686,"score_gpt":0.3182835016711685,"score_spread":0.2878540427041318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403728798","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18005747,0.08241987,0.008484366,0.196089,0.010129952,0.005419654,0.0010075192,0.001659732,0.5147324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99659437,0.0006253806,0.00014126685,0.00015677519,0.0002228632,0.00009355582,0.000018490897,0.0000069848275,0.0021402873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978527,0.00012158148,0.00044862684,0.00038381782,0.00057057943,0.00062273984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987473,0.00048762216,0.000108505155,0.00018167823,0.00028965657,0.00018527369],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007190469,0.00022938944,0.000261587,0.000086751075,0.0070054494,0.00032788268,0.00030619136,0.00015369135,0.00008924625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00075696333,0.00016064283,0.00017320241,0.00039276356,0.017524473,0.000587838,0.0001997752,0.000271376,0.00006113484],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011848932,0.000029771305,0.004901387,0.000038284794,0.00014437329,0.000008249126,0.0009919272,0.00001325497,0.00035203714,0.98585147,0.005769017,0.0018884038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004507869,0.0000431877,0.0010815585,0.00025212092,0.00011458361,0.000026758353,0.010066826,0.0001510561,0.00025406523,0.038579814,0.9486452,0.00033405118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001018762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022997062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94727165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018728146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067086617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9942873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403728899","doi":"10.21991/cf29478","title":"A Promising Piece of the Puzzle: Human Dignity and the Role of Section 1 of the Charter","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Dignity; Section (typography); History; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.016127653866552173,"score_gpt":0.27468008543169004,"score_spread":0.25855243156513785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403728899","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8108635,0.009297967,0.0014924551,0.03671759,0.0047838204,0.003600894,0.00044289487,0.00014684943,0.13265404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993911,0.00006017223,0.000032928932,0.00007906687,0.00013011892,0.000042930358,0.0000029975324,0.0000037733437,0.00025690513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823487,0.00023408097,0.0004533639,0.00022256549,0.000569469,0.00028567092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988582,0.0003147601,0.0002470495,0.0002155492,0.00031899146,0.000045450946],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073298585,0.0001580627,0.00026904006,0.000042642678,0.0029298735,0.00006073817,0.00036407466,0.000119468954,0.00004283276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00064979534,0.000078522,0.00028160756,0.00045421254,0.022333756,0.00032427403,0.0002644191,0.00026190787,0.0000023943896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022409822,0.00003512928,0.019448139,0.000045147135,0.00010606395,2.0446306e-7,0.0030492605,0.00004176839,0.0025254374,0.9740045,0.00030245376,0.00041947718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0056433463,0.00013257081,0.07393749,0.0038044092,0.0011557669,0.00012825265,0.100368015,0.0015559279,0.030571217,0.3425822,0.43894356,0.00117723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020234012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018466967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6314223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014206425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056091155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403728913","doi":"10.21991/cf29476","title":"From Gross Disproportionality to Human Dignity: Redefining Section 12 in the Context of Mandatory Minimum Sentences","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Dignity; Context (archaeology); Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Geography; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.034615523784844046,"score_gpt":0.3237946074599685,"score_spread":0.28917908367512446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403728913","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7460328,0.0009920273,0.036936007,0.037426002,0.009382086,0.001718313,0.0020579095,0.00031148188,0.16514342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974206,0.000022760174,0.00014156019,0.00095853285,0.000660533,0.00009606721,0.00038452048,0.000005814935,0.00030961694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973493,0.0002107545,0.00065234996,0.00044143086,0.0009394304,0.0004067104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988503,0.0004395179,0.00014784274,0.00018481918,0.00027220868,0.00010533681],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012228044,0.00019391258,0.0002282512,0.00024741254,0.0013468892,0.00022459628,0.00038293068,0.00015987913,0.00025081442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044298996,0.00016409221,0.00018655334,0.0004599611,0.0030502952,0.000778006,0.00007629205,0.00028139053,0.00007770782],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034323533,0.000097413045,0.028094651,0.000014928059,0.0000487581,0.000018703771,0.002264416,0.000089523885,0.0005252368,0.9648168,0.0033873308,0.0006079031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012076026,0.00014932182,0.024574632,0.0012367216,0.00013347584,0.00005411913,0.07258132,0.00052097265,0.0008421138,0.2640086,0.6338627,0.00082839344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01011399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019419465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70080817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033289462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011561825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403729115","doi":"10.21991/cf29474","title":"The Place of Gladue in Constitutional Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.016706125249959868,"score_gpt":0.2963097214409912,"score_spread":0.27960359619103137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403729115","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062562516,0.012125104,0.04155857,0.04116206,0.009138875,0.0013779603,0.00047498246,0.0004528041,0.8874534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972947,0.00060095784,0.00019823614,0.000436999,0.00029736978,0.0000889916,0.000048438997,0.000007391748,0.0010268627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996953,0.00017853506,0.0007717941,0.00046642302,0.0008495883,0.0007806527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980819,0.000986883,0.00012785174,0.00028657922,0.00031749601,0.00019928973],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014487947,0.00026145086,0.0002974932,0.00025440723,0.0026663684,0.00028788342,0.00045128513,0.00025171385,0.00027926892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047676818,0.00022011017,0.0002638966,0.0008154982,0.031203244,0.0008712641,0.000119361146,0.0004253307,0.00016792929],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059362996,0.000070306254,0.002868321,0.000023933524,0.000060851267,0.00003647781,0.00034772776,0.0005295726,0.00008227659,0.9905774,0.0033597383,0.001984034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000548071,0.00003105602,0.00020540041,0.00033736957,0.000030450608,0.00007449347,0.002373062,0.00070069416,0.000112229594,0.05903867,0.93627465,0.0002738521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018066169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010049297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9910385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050062215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046853838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403729234","doi":"10.21991/cf29475","title":"Legislative Context in Sentencing: A Closer Look at R v Sharma","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Context (archaeology); Political science; Sentencing guidelines; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Linguistics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.029011147646927353,"score_gpt":0.3132181404770611,"score_spread":0.28420699283013373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403729234","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18917951,0.018281931,0.09716996,0.028437242,0.011247222,0.0019910783,0.0005948234,0.0011742054,0.651924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99434334,0.00038649706,0.00014012528,0.0010583709,0.00033224918,0.00012341658,0.00008227995,0.000011962127,0.0035217605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969934,0.00015390723,0.00060075615,0.0006966443,0.0006761869,0.00087905605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986489,0.00042045576,0.0000943234,0.0002525726,0.00030776727,0.0002760086],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006262332,0.00031485962,0.00036125127,0.0006696766,0.001987823,0.00028398226,0.00031872926,0.00022717808,0.001791256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046996374,0.00031759817,0.00037284486,0.0013506784,0.0052263853,0.0011047644,0.00017252703,0.00042645002,0.0013205954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056745455,0.000096223295,0.012275841,0.000028565739,0.00011159977,0.00020761785,0.0036352177,0.00050419086,0.0001199496,0.9658875,0.0073903603,0.009686201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069099106,0.00004144714,0.000133457,0.0005014426,0.00025883765,0.00018352424,0.22345756,0.0040355446,0.00012414687,0.006687583,0.7632796,0.00060583453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007376116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06785883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9591999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014300535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002792189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404584955","doi":"10.21991/cf29481","title":"R v Lufiau, R v Varennes, and The Gamble of Litigating a “Right” to Jury Trials Outside of Section 11(f)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Law; Charter; Political science; Section (typography); Conversation; Supreme court; Framing (construction); Sociology; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.03014268201789548,"score_gpt":0.3195374123099204,"score_spread":0.2893947302920249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404584955","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16045313,0.03316198,0.13092652,0.13663152,0.024138367,0.008249117,0.0028271198,0.0010610704,0.5025512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965766,0.0003734547,0.001136103,0.0004948196,0.0004806593,0.000092728376,0.000024269695,0.0000064991923,0.0008148873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99742055,0.0003455466,0.00085672596,0.00036048808,0.00058761705,0.0004290991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976834,0.001338861,0.00024382139,0.00019866844,0.00037185758,0.00016338701],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029369928,0.00020726035,0.0005411222,0.00006210233,0.0014624944,0.00011086923,0.00026334124,0.00024591133,0.00022357465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022330768,0.00014296547,0.00039625738,0.0006772026,0.0099266535,0.000498485,0.00012106456,0.00024152346,0.000018387414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006211486,0.0000337247,0.0010748891,0.00008002764,0.00012953089,0.0000035734802,0.0029309145,0.00015719658,0.00060773105,0.9857489,0.008288815,0.0008825785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023020748,0.000076748445,0.0002244044,0.0013522293,0.0003852827,0.00010031749,0.030697765,0.00031248105,0.0027171848,0.2294427,0.7318605,0.00052829366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000839756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010019583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83612347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013353434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015407088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404585783","doi":"10.21991/cf29482","title":"The Prudent Parliament and Section 24(1)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Section (typography); Political science; Computer science; Law; Operating system; Politics","score_opus":0.018328256684608444,"score_gpt":0.2984950539539075,"score_spread":0.28016679726929905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404585783","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006936901,0.071654774,0.08753923,0.107150994,0.04300187,0.0025501295,0.00030214965,0.0017876441,0.6790763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99300927,0.00091005216,0.0003568551,0.0004800307,0.000787958,0.00014357384,0.000018012617,0.000009744735,0.004284492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744654,0.00014161285,0.00040673354,0.0004929194,0.0007566362,0.0007555513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987136,0.00048535105,0.000072341354,0.00026374208,0.00019053275,0.00027440378],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090158754,0.00023549334,0.00017829442,0.00013366259,0.0049764393,0.00092869176,0.00033863925,0.00019397943,0.00016175846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005423336,0.00018225703,0.00014427242,0.00048029926,0.011262261,0.0007634381,0.00018235669,0.00038828657,0.0003325811],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017605173,0.000024436911,0.0021339043,0.000013450154,0.00006550142,0.000025003521,0.0016958839,0.00005122903,0.00003137325,0.9718542,0.020520562,0.0035668497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022505657,0.000026772383,0.000068222165,0.00011973938,0.000043021875,0.00005452199,0.00572632,0.000359456,0.000041203766,0.028297095,0.9647925,0.00024610676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041301447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001080784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98607236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053975184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001731011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99631894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404586027","doi":"10.21991/cf29479","title":"Notwithstanding the Notwithstanding Clause","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Compromise; Constitution; Political science; Law; Charter; Federalism; Politics; Human rights; Democracy; Law and economics; Constitutional law; Independence (probability theory); Sociology","score_opus":0.035735627502750104,"score_gpt":0.30974509407732737,"score_spread":0.27400946657457725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404586027","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035099252,0.016229503,0.17556778,0.07668246,0.0129192425,0.0013973332,0.00044069087,0.0014054148,0.71184766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948905,0.00073811377,0.0002777609,0.0016512303,0.0011274186,0.000098963785,0.0000362303,0.00001555396,0.0011642032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961546,0.0001682154,0.0006185636,0.000687095,0.0011940409,0.0011774824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981056,0.0008124572,0.00011095116,0.00031565866,0.0003505854,0.0003047854],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011861601,0.00040940673,0.00035816475,0.00031040813,0.008822449,0.0007505055,0.0006180766,0.00024451097,0.00063617923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008641011,0.0003056311,0.00037707158,0.001275256,0.017369261,0.0011577323,0.00023701653,0.00059914147,0.00087425194],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003409647,0.000038523387,0.0050590853,0.0000145301965,0.00018283183,0.00008778896,0.0008367444,0.00018707219,0.00006885416,0.97509426,0.016757667,0.0016385585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033664744,0.000026494408,0.00019016453,0.00038614115,0.00011501963,0.00012219445,0.010283266,0.00030493198,0.00005135237,0.1501349,0.8375687,0.00048016358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013298225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024243265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9913806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008916413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038032096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404586346","doi":"10.21991/cf29480","title":"Not Merely Interpretative","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.02562652841561336,"score_gpt":0.32874291388411897,"score_spread":0.3031163854685056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404586346","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010950874,0.0067403694,0.15609968,0.023875955,0.009580385,0.0008101392,0.0005225112,0.0013326673,0.7999432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99089175,0.000103200626,0.0017946842,0.0017014636,0.0005332302,0.00011820093,0.00006076429,0.00001785693,0.004778822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99652773,0.00019139623,0.0005719089,0.0007325625,0.00095600466,0.0010203749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820167,0.00059592223,0.000095076284,0.0003335731,0.000363019,0.0004107481],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007397699,0.00035611886,0.0003434975,0.00036316834,0.0021539764,0.0005467952,0.0006235348,0.00029876028,0.0015852741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012595573,0.00034734127,0.00034068193,0.0009014305,0.0141069945,0.001543763,0.00021486376,0.0005573965,0.003583884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038022274,0.00004589006,0.0009052256,0.000022406199,0.00012335787,0.000111785266,0.006171074,0.00009286541,0.00008157365,0.9748099,0.015367935,0.0022299786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030658176,0.00003581536,0.000029277175,0.0002896547,0.00006930851,0.000045733075,0.005905473,0.0007045135,0.00024337649,0.038121935,0.9537756,0.0004727592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046160846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004125892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9897967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070781447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003777802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407932841","doi":"10.21991/cf29485","title":"What is Most Bothersome About Section 33: Or What Hasn’t Yet Been Said","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); History; Political science; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.021247723575024358,"score_gpt":0.3104137479691132,"score_spread":0.28916602439408884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407932841","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028762417,0.025168465,0.121116616,0.23480278,0.092848875,0.005268735,0.0009833918,0.0021665166,0.4888822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9516005,0.009971258,0.00035996982,0.012661891,0.00084245624,0.00020321118,0.00018487268,0.000021196673,0.024154635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99627256,0.00016831729,0.0007632142,0.0008263934,0.0008819597,0.0010875546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99804246,0.00032200123,0.00026273655,0.00048509124,0.0005951311,0.00029258445],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007831452,0.0004493499,0.00048000112,0.0005051196,0.004780814,0.0017069756,0.0005323632,0.0005409656,0.001992074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035349638,0.0004379574,0.00032179448,0.0012625876,0.0067308014,0.0062043373,0.00018618343,0.00045160548,0.00031799581],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017428635,0.00015322979,0.0033059518,0.00002810006,0.0001581705,0.00001736798,0.0010337235,0.00012539876,0.00013497846,0.9451569,0.03007628,0.019635623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014646454,0.00006531993,0.0005133334,0.0009343874,0.00010834106,0.000042237858,0.0215427,0.0002239802,0.0002480846,0.018235214,0.9560903,0.00053147663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013630379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005019564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92692167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00090343284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046405457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407932888","doi":"10.21991/cf29483","title":"Negating Positive Rights: A Note on Mathur v Ontario","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Political science; Socioeconomics; Sociology","score_opus":0.01889805905399201,"score_gpt":0.3111670329715735,"score_spread":0.2922689739175815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407932888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016759615,0.00028022664,0.03877582,0.033011664,0.0036628055,0.00086268823,0.00013137715,0.000303987,0.9062118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871791,0.000015487698,0.0011218128,0.0035444396,0.0001702624,0.00007071244,0.00004776992,0.0000050673425,0.007845327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971721,0.00012801087,0.0005232909,0.0006088045,0.0006724617,0.0008953316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829495,0.00056414364,0.00015434148,0.00032074985,0.00041458182,0.0002512307],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053171,0.0003237017,0.00033984464,0.00028721476,0.0052092485,0.00025414745,0.00047700966,0.00026376513,0.0005621839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067978754,0.00031753976,0.00025718493,0.00054177846,0.006548985,0.0007951825,0.00014578122,0.0004774489,0.0005226323],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110750065,0.00011976121,0.004416368,0.000010319762,0.000049670685,0.000059305075,0.00070186617,0.0001654735,0.000054714517,0.98238504,0.010911477,0.0010152801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008329697,0.00006738675,0.0012761876,0.000815696,0.0000885247,0.000031907402,0.0022010885,0.00007811327,0.0003330173,0.17103776,0.82276285,0.00047452553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05538038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21822171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9704195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001569002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00543494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407933020","doi":"10.21991/cf29486","title":"Bill C53: An Ill-Advised Adventure of State Interference in the Constitutional Evolution of the State-Aboriginal Relationship","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Adventure; Law; Political science; History; Computer science; Art history","score_opus":0.012825318725294698,"score_gpt":0.2709262440852484,"score_spread":0.2581009253599537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407933020","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29395673,0.006434157,0.2582809,0.058749836,0.015251649,0.006532727,0.00614226,0.00031897993,0.35433275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980331,0.0000878901,0.00016286103,0.00046798115,0.000045719928,0.000058533504,0.00004820882,0.0000036375898,0.0010920698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99706364,0.00047816653,0.0008195091,0.00039465624,0.0007206935,0.0005233187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997895,0.00038579834,0.0003794414,0.00048055823,0.000734177,0.00012503378],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011411585,0.00021726314,0.000316077,0.00085884164,0.0024139842,0.00013648543,0.0009134582,0.00019027603,0.00014497926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010622009,0.00017351093,0.00023808132,0.001717159,0.03480969,0.00083373714,0.000081354054,0.0005063984,0.000018512043],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008105699,0.00017669756,0.05917128,0.000034946235,0.000032100404,0.000004359199,0.0011885734,0.0025144753,0.00007794803,0.9343772,0.0019777904,0.0003635706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022929402,0.00009325095,0.07676314,0.0010621481,0.00014042287,0.000043633634,0.014029481,0.0003882024,0.00011693368,0.45165908,0.45282632,0.0005844298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055795364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27781922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70407635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015682211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017670335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99888474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407934253","doi":"10.21991/cf29484","title":"Ontario’s Ag-Gag Law, Where do Things Stand?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Art","score_opus":0.01628257739348415,"score_gpt":0.28987895374662537,"score_spread":0.2735963763531412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407934253","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016527267,0.0019308967,0.07367683,0.031461183,0.0018370004,0.0008626107,0.00018455993,0.00031492006,0.8880793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9756197,0.0001526671,0.001439866,0.0032461078,0.0001628908,0.00017164384,0.00004718447,0.000007633909,0.019152332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99713725,0.00009239663,0.00059206714,0.00063197996,0.0006386713,0.00090766046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835163,0.00022100794,0.00016758572,0.0004766817,0.00047850792,0.00030456315],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006142486,0.0003178375,0.00034286428,0.00018520963,0.0055823685,0.0004427968,0.00068021886,0.00031801118,0.0013159607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023536083,0.00032528405,0.0002775129,0.0006192647,0.008520135,0.0012760967,0.00025881693,0.000515219,0.000459447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027775326,0.000118514574,0.00888767,0.00001711759,0.00007462908,0.000008940085,0.00058767654,0.0001391278,0.00003907741,0.96562356,0.023639904,0.0008360123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006940306,0.000013490594,0.00022016029,0.00018760237,0.00005223462,0.000011209698,0.0033830034,0.000036699377,0.00004527456,0.12807624,0.8669516,0.00032844237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03893708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14562908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97396696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012766047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00831128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410002467","doi":"10.21991/cf29491","title":"“We do not really know why this approach was taken”: Explaining and Modifying the Supreme Court’s Approach to the Indirect Horizontal Effect of Charter Rights","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02154921779442441,"score_gpt":0.27536276577393937,"score_spread":0.25381354797951494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410002467","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012636288,0.005737988,0.09705743,0.02205538,0.0031750356,0.004254412,0.00042444727,0.0003297578,0.8543293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99574596,0.00008620627,0.0016168599,0.0009113005,0.0002883056,0.0004335831,0.00004819727,0.000012396295,0.0008571853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957248,0.00065698934,0.0007063603,0.0008123417,0.0010860242,0.0010135025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99738884,0.0011163887,0.0002595001,0.0006585152,0.00031557473,0.0002612063],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025267024,0.0004802375,0.00064340886,0.00032338614,0.005288718,0.00037258543,0.0011391096,0.00034020064,0.0000544439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010128639,0.0003045017,0.00028341953,0.0010521823,0.009326165,0.0006499644,0.00047441624,0.00065011345,0.000047652687],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018009101,0.00009355667,0.0028583608,0.000057773825,0.00018574807,0.000004097651,0.013426979,0.00040080058,0.00006438892,0.9699589,0.011502453,0.0012668194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019903912,0.00018308988,0.00013813647,0.00051438005,0.0003173057,0.00006144568,0.014450372,0.0021877442,0.00080308266,0.0063011497,0.9723173,0.0007356435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00086945825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036435187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98310965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035018503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011441142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410002500","doi":"10.21991/cf29489","title":"A Kick in the Caboose: Recovering the Judicial Horizontality of Constitutional Equality Rights","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02899769913866132,"score_gpt":0.3149318039569513,"score_spread":0.28593410481828996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410002500","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023608752,0.0035321573,0.04776875,0.043275822,0.00512017,0.0022464746,0.00061045174,0.00016779377,0.8736696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965983,0.00016977561,0.00015559893,0.0022556155,0.00033018028,0.00021554223,0.00005464581,0.0000033822178,0.00021693324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99538785,0.0006614979,0.0011551616,0.00060157105,0.0012390445,0.0009548739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971832,0.001270063,0.00033624118,0.00048705874,0.0006015866,0.000121866964],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002732573,0.0003963231,0.0005744025,0.0002977797,0.0061129616,0.00015142892,0.0011510577,0.0002904415,0.00015096384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014615448,0.00027767906,0.00040375724,0.00164798,0.04393308,0.0006366325,0.00029052672,0.0006311271,0.00005820013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012161614,0.00024561989,0.024698636,0.000016226575,0.0001343908,0.000018443998,0.0005125709,0.00033046657,0.000035334004,0.9679737,0.005299003,0.00061401195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001234696,0.00003740197,0.0076434,0.000318835,0.00011647796,0.00003706052,0.00785443,0.000041902003,0.00008231641,0.51889485,0.4633335,0.00040510204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014896366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024101697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97298956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006167913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065826867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410002519","doi":"10.21991/cf29492","title":"Editors' Introduction: Beyond Dolphin Delivery","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Travel Writing and Literature","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Alberta; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Fishery; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.008674139978887597,"score_gpt":0.2144849643956954,"score_spread":0.20581082441680779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410002519","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003104309,0.0034154898,0.012690904,0.066504516,0.07219728,0.0007413252,0.001117676,0.000896668,0.8393318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9522419,0.000029701554,0.00041776113,0.003735373,0.016274543,0.000086412016,0.00048166126,0.000011976104,0.026720688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976725,0.000053919575,0.00060801255,0.00062719366,0.00038137982,0.00065698504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985574,0.00013755108,0.00013107946,0.00041873922,0.00060659833,0.00014867283],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002433208,0.0003907257,0.000356557,0.000431612,0.0025913664,0.00050482486,0.0003468112,0.0002018979,0.0019703682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020143096,0.0003692183,0.00026657878,0.00023151243,0.006331284,0.0008784287,0.00013687449,0.0005185612,0.0003997276],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004074232,0.00008232295,0.0003387397,0.00002837259,0.00008243081,0.000010481555,0.00018364421,0.00009200395,0.00005135915,0.6344547,0.36351943,0.0011157821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089430134,0.000034241217,0.000062126885,0.00016038034,0.00007326138,0.00007336505,0.002726914,0.0000970512,0.00015867599,0.03800907,0.9573153,0.00039529428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010023148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019647145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94913757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018169192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009838826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410002556","doi":"10.21991/cf29490","title":"Charter Horizontality, the Public/Private Divide, and Responding to Injustice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Charter; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Law","score_opus":0.026127192820648328,"score_gpt":0.3095340130693342,"score_spread":0.28340682024868585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410002556","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05332288,0.00081887684,0.19298545,0.26897606,0.0053914394,0.0018477708,0.00015669543,0.0003601085,0.47614074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98793423,0.00007008442,0.0006359127,0.0061383164,0.00017762305,0.000118229465,0.000019692663,0.0000049225728,0.004900992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975437,0.00016928327,0.00045245534,0.00048941636,0.00054842717,0.0007967316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986332,0.00036388778,0.00009022346,0.00031284968,0.00028364157,0.00031619085],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012547886,0.00024139103,0.00024429412,0.0005890634,0.0059902277,0.0005581759,0.0005095995,0.00015145219,0.00023289805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009564888,0.00017919819,0.00009629931,0.0011278946,0.0058558104,0.00066040043,0.00044394267,0.00024596293,0.0001905786],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030621104,0.000038273894,0.0077470983,0.000009351744,0.00005744165,0.000009773979,0.0005839032,0.00000780295,0.00004958228,0.9712,0.01769536,0.002570803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003987521,0.000018974673,0.0017680184,0.000112993555,0.000032219574,0.00001462801,0.002634213,0.00002103573,0.000039613795,0.11380241,0.88090545,0.0002517053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015934337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013482728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9346113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035592457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027165352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99684966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410002592","doi":"10.21991/cf29488","title":"Towards a Less Woolly Conception of Horizontal Effect","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Architecture and Computational Design","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.0066317549830013445,"score_gpt":0.22431761289032257,"score_spread":0.21768585790732123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410002592","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030534206,0.0013673225,0.8502934,0.00046944912,0.0020627838,0.0005447416,0.00017834888,0.00037241317,0.114177346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974026,0.00002918987,0.0019526082,0.00020425093,0.00009225995,0.00009540514,0.00013063423,0.000010324292,0.00008272272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834996,0.00005466016,0.0005228058,0.00030353825,0.00034529096,0.00042374525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919784,0.0002096354,0.00007139162,0.00023274358,0.00018643777,0.000101933394],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019581348,0.00032213092,0.00042367986,0.0003511631,0.00035197425,0.000036599933,0.00027024545,0.00018394919,0.0000633945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011218163,0.00031270384,0.00025320952,0.0005056883,0.001997223,0.00027252547,0.00008371138,0.0002570607,0.00005423345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008148779,0.00003655022,0.002753895,0.00010395642,0.00017961349,0.000009245858,0.000022949465,0.040422935,0.0028595335,0.9306765,0.003292733,0.019560607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.019678593,0.0015689495,0.015287378,0.0038214051,0.0011607993,0.0010309106,0.002273175,0.16873121,0.14402178,0.37205905,0.26559564,0.004771137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022516384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026895386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9668684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019924971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006995173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410002594","doi":"10.21991/cf29487","title":"The Hidden Promise of Dolphin Delivery: Shields, Swords and Horizontal Application of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Shields; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Engineering; Sociology; Electrical engineering","score_opus":0.0077785180062920145,"score_gpt":0.25335356214879684,"score_spread":0.24557504414250483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410002594","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38415903,0.012901152,0.01039652,0.15690327,0.0030379735,0.0051813903,0.001341249,0.00008748228,0.42599192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992542,0.00013774993,0.000129326,0.00016420394,0.000042821328,0.00003669302,0.0000042874476,0.0000017329453,0.00022896097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886066,0.00006757753,0.00034973444,0.00018115451,0.0002552846,0.00028561865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910754,0.00020679254,0.00018578566,0.00019040033,0.000213652,0.00009581119],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036428848,0.00011986541,0.00020837538,0.000101302714,0.002764123,0.000023424438,0.00025108398,0.00012592695,0.00000654512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020533052,0.00007625096,0.000078113284,0.0002716783,0.017449725,0.00014105804,0.00012750165,0.00012056841,0.0000010820579],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021810418,0.000017178145,0.04404554,0.000017468874,0.00006848534,2.5328083e-7,0.0005811591,0.0000021972803,0.000057185556,0.9523576,0.0015869003,0.0012442588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022947649,0.000106081236,0.073761664,0.00059762946,0.0003145384,0.000026206653,0.014241712,0.00037005384,0.0012995054,0.5820366,0.3244578,0.00049341586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14349513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47397768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6150952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010518098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019059889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99853414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414957213","doi":"10.21991/cf29498","title":"Deconstructing City of Toronto: Unwritten Constitutional Principles and Responsive Judicial Review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Judicial review; Supreme court; Democracy; Constitutional law; Judicial activism; Key (lock); Judicial opinion","score_opus":0.024817443499189795,"score_gpt":0.31920598021649615,"score_spread":0.29438853671730636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414957213","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005464366,0.09437214,0.016126262,0.025074711,0.0031099084,0.0018482556,0.0006618984,0.00028285047,0.8530596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9754132,0.01589143,0.002874603,0.004208724,0.00021480508,0.00009671549,0.0000855234,0.000005672294,0.0012093191],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99683,0.00025501414,0.0009234914,0.00059760845,0.00069240644,0.0007014851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99752253,0.0005591101,0.00038295478,0.00031945735,0.00096598826,0.00024993005],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001235437,0.00034078123,0.0006292228,0.00004400936,0.0033125242,0.000085241525,0.0004422502,0.00039302217,0.000736111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028603282,0.00033875345,0.00031797218,0.00047152734,0.032698657,0.00088911963,0.00027934142,0.00035735226,0.000015016365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056187164,0.000075051874,0.02071782,0.0001906593,0.00016131651,0.000007573818,0.00025061955,0.00001897052,0.0000906546,0.9689308,0.008015206,0.0014851377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001507506,0.000038408074,0.0017939158,0.00406019,0.00030436905,0.00013045616,0.010896693,0.0000345258,0.00022525304,0.0769764,0.903406,0.0006262584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00093328935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003000136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9699488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053874194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060469033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414957217","doi":"10.21991/cf29493","title":"Editors’ Introduction: Responsive Judicial Review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Constitutional review; Legislation; Constitution; Judicial opinion; Public policy","score_opus":0.016730526873929313,"score_gpt":0.3061496900456219,"score_spread":0.2894191631716926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414957217","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010441439,0.029086975,0.02361148,0.31189716,0.029818613,0.0014197738,0.00018970064,0.0004941999,0.6033777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9361894,0.01175201,0.0008112137,0.026124826,0.01885129,0.0005428317,0.00023682824,0.000016313385,0.005475298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99597883,0.00029852806,0.00086847885,0.00080139923,0.0010224729,0.0010302888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973202,0.00040620158,0.0002386463,0.00042078987,0.0013317823,0.00028238437],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011111347,0.000420234,0.0006361615,0.0004079907,0.0063315504,0.00013004061,0.0005969959,0.00029879157,0.0010330328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004153892,0.00042996823,0.00039083118,0.0016782328,0.016884305,0.0008112018,0.0002837668,0.00048473635,0.0006361368],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057314384,0.000075200864,0.0011969547,0.000034620178,0.00010663277,0.0000135573355,0.000037395093,0.000023787474,0.000018234543,0.6185667,0.3787724,0.0010971931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005553645,0.000025428832,0.00023956413,0.0009435557,0.00015727752,0.000029079576,0.0014852027,0.000004998734,0.000042598913,0.13483286,0.86128706,0.00039702782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010555752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011150774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.936085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076786237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073778713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414957218","doi":"10.21991/cf29496","title":"The Regime Politics of Responsive Judicial Review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Judicial independence; Charter; Judicial activism; Supreme court; Politics; Skepticism; Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.018028879206513602,"score_gpt":0.31882299909524886,"score_spread":0.3007941198887353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414957218","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009345062,0.035976004,0.0072039147,0.08695462,0.0040799226,0.0014106263,0.00017638595,0.0001761266,0.8630879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97155344,0.0063952627,0.00022366851,0.005336933,0.00027303607,0.00006935015,0.00003481155,0.0000062876566,0.01610718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99738973,0.00026391674,0.00069350004,0.00032717365,0.0006147473,0.0007108996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99759483,0.0007505629,0.00025331706,0.00043311916,0.00080378127,0.0001643754],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010265576,0.00021344403,0.00037230345,0.00019414692,0.005768189,0.00008382138,0.00063370296,0.00016772446,0.00020538883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019303984,0.0001670093,0.00027903492,0.0005960676,0.018719306,0.00029765294,0.00014346887,0.00026649365,0.0001280927],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003231659,0.000045268487,0.00052801956,0.000059837712,0.00006630592,0.0000061272262,0.00009462597,0.0000056839913,0.000011317665,0.923037,0.07547833,0.0006351973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034177987,0.000017037462,0.00013857035,0.0010457214,0.00007392256,0.000008151602,0.0011147133,0.0000068224344,0.00006611495,0.29715785,0.6998811,0.0001482385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002896333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013793046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97061896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029782724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006265032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99936855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414957225","doi":"10.21991/cf29499","title":"Responsive Judicial Review in Canada: Reflections on the Notwithstanding Clause and Beyond","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Scope (computer science); Constitutional review; Judicial opinion; Judicial activism; Constitutional law; Constitution","score_opus":0.03875688112898575,"score_gpt":0.32320262861898413,"score_spread":0.2844457474899984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414957225","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004588868,0.01639655,0.0025928037,0.26229754,0.0028988225,0.0016013182,0.00024864342,0.00009609791,0.70927936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9680792,0.005553032,0.000061675666,0.025714822,0.00011766286,0.00016215743,0.000014704492,0.000004185337,0.0002925297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99730223,0.00027927788,0.0005746003,0.00048002234,0.0006624166,0.0007014709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99799883,0.0011309506,0.00014094215,0.00023260666,0.00034667875,0.00015000052],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088767544,0.00027866257,0.00040518097,0.0002612584,0.0048325513,0.00007623296,0.00032264864,0.000119166565,0.00014219101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002834333,0.00022833401,0.00010759341,0.0012644242,0.0071206433,0.0002822678,0.00016565017,0.0004736618,0.000029236711],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071678274,0.00003697386,0.009284742,0.000018849016,0.000062791594,0.000026075451,0.000111131936,0.00005251149,0.000011674456,0.9635498,0.026175762,0.0005980347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008802726,0.00003776296,0.0044777673,0.0026679507,0.00012263985,0.000031578238,0.016064221,0.000027138918,0.000033387474,0.2057273,0.7694052,0.00052480405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4059119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9268923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96349037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019549606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017077768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414957226","doi":"10.21991/cf29497","title":"The Role of Democratic Majority Understandings of Rights in Rosalind Dixon’s Responsive Judicial Review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Democracy; Judicial activism; Subject (documents); Judicial independence","score_opus":0.010602688835130982,"score_gpt":0.2920016914288353,"score_spread":0.2813990025937043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414957226","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062208707,0.08651635,0.0055772066,0.045501523,0.0029836632,0.00280346,0.00038125776,0.00011473967,0.8499009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99488795,0.0035967934,0.00017973773,0.0006883809,0.00005294776,0.000050450704,0.000020301813,0.0000022884396,0.000521156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975959,0.0002739953,0.00076786295,0.00028667043,0.0005844434,0.00049110677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981827,0.000649455,0.00031361636,0.0002578143,0.00050773734,0.00008868822],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012866278,0.00018753983,0.00042661422,0.00005413994,0.0022931248,0.00003531482,0.0004780771,0.00024443975,0.000068063666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012627541,0.00014496649,0.00027014877,0.0009722367,0.014091737,0.0003206137,0.000113209855,0.00030231383,0.000008747252],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007716035,0.00007987312,0.00526949,0.00007444204,0.00006748619,0.0000026201483,0.00036051965,0.000024822171,0.000095945834,0.98594135,0.007783621,0.00022268236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057371444,0.000018648207,0.00020916763,0.0016753589,0.000079721365,0.0000045581023,0.00728345,0.000022082037,0.00044554655,0.7108179,0.27871212,0.00015776293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011147044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006988037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9886671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039780035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031136367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99900573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414957232","doi":"10.21991/cf29494","title":"Living Dead Constitutionalism or Why Old Constitutional Worlds Are Never Lost for Good: A Comment on Rosalind Dixon’s Responsive Judicial Review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Charter; Constitutional theory; Normative; Section (typography); Articulation (sociology); Judicial review; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.03886540404702162,"score_gpt":0.327677094621816,"score_spread":0.2888116905747944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414957232","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00029035565,0.019351125,0.15545575,0.3799021,0.012458731,0.008053837,0.0058863256,0.0008242889,0.41777748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75399894,0.0051399223,0.001781443,0.22966792,0.0017987634,0.0018505227,0.00056072907,0.000035030644,0.005166721],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919096,0.0006236459,0.0019066391,0.0016659225,0.0017404886,0.0021536949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912696,0.004077486,0.00081890187,0.0007625771,0.0024014444,0.00066997524],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023961703,0.0011173247,0.0016455284,0.00087666046,0.010213001,0.00036600675,0.0011949136,0.00067098247,0.0012917947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008129405,0.0010493556,0.00095801597,0.0019511987,0.035866316,0.0013718044,0.00056526094,0.0009150458,0.0005270557],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00075583934,0.00053159666,0.0048209256,0.00018262464,0.00048361323,0.000064751526,0.00007452456,0.0002855242,0.000013765355,0.73772424,0.25458875,0.00047384517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002651964,0.00014210325,0.0006065549,0.009432981,0.0005031364,0.00008710507,0.001970083,0.000050604704,0.000040394683,0.090434164,0.8929126,0.0011683105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014054987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004205278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7537086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021817724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014233886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414957244","doi":"10.21991/cf29495","title":"Out of the Shadows: Responsive Judicial Review and the Resurgence of the Notwithstanding Clause","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Legitimacy; Judicial activism; Charter; Judicial independence; Democratic legitimacy; Order (exchange); Judicial opinion","score_opus":0.017971527778015053,"score_gpt":0.301501207142136,"score_spread":0.283529679364121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414957244","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010478321,0.09693648,0.011807532,0.29176855,0.013546168,0.007459626,0.00071165216,0.00012524372,0.56716645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943575,0.0018484147,0.00002347009,0.0029072382,0.000086940694,0.000047925532,0.000001588591,0.0000031696616,0.0007237498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975246,0.0004813884,0.0007235285,0.00027334417,0.0006346441,0.00036245663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99760693,0.00078797044,0.0004963071,0.00040121333,0.0006457165,0.00006187323],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018864769,0.00017597107,0.00046002053,0.00007424308,0.0029074657,0.0000489985,0.0007271943,0.00013463583,0.000043367436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061538215,0.00009288721,0.0002683226,0.00095553516,0.022224009,0.0002765868,0.00035596642,0.0002790893,0.0000041855164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000095405434,0.000021401194,0.008432634,0.0001627976,0.00006628096,5.3252734e-7,0.0005644994,0.000021308804,0.000066871246,0.98369455,0.006714867,0.00015884211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029179412,0.000035493453,0.003824334,0.011393823,0.00091030146,0.000025337698,0.012254781,0.00004917416,0.0011464137,0.2451017,0.7218396,0.00050108496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020042525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003606181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9838792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013144834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004116982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416019410","doi":"10.21991/cf29507","title":"Notwithstanding the Backbench: Section 33 in Non-Government Bills","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Invocation; Vocabulary; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.014658170540866971,"score_gpt":0.27418131762501635,"score_spread":0.25952314708414936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416019410","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022353353,0.003521236,0.12194624,0.05601372,0.027359923,0.0036248409,0.0017080033,0.0001426736,0.76333004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888169,0.0005588607,0.00008955692,0.0030193815,0.0007113428,0.00019425273,0.000018075172,0.000012413605,0.006579179],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993044,0.00036850185,0.0015847014,0.0011061936,0.0018395435,0.0020570308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971745,0.00093189755,0.00051721436,0.0006672979,0.00032243904,0.0003866268],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001925728,0.0006792856,0.0007767032,0.00024770337,0.004664473,0.0004994092,0.0009705237,0.00065250753,0.0004644565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015176367,0.00055657845,0.0004988626,0.0021494096,0.013116951,0.0011473827,0.00047138197,0.0010131533,0.00022953108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009732217,0.00025276214,0.045995608,0.00007420077,0.00013533056,0.000026989543,0.00038857452,0.0010597619,0.00012746722,0.9389138,0.0117682405,0.0011599237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026404583,0.00008600186,0.013397701,0.0024874224,0.00014902506,0.000049561393,0.0108038625,0.0029139249,0.00022860279,0.040677622,0.92560804,0.0009577867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008728069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010784546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96646357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042442805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004916596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416019415","doi":"10.21991/cf29504","title":"Is the Notwithstanding Clause an Ouster Clause?","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Charter; Jurisprudence; Jurisdiction; High Court; Judicial review; Original jurisdiction; Political question","score_opus":0.057133175380252456,"score_gpt":0.35987310849531035,"score_spread":0.30273993311505787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416019415","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007809117,0.0010230889,0.10493805,0.14429413,0.013169952,0.002315583,0.0009567766,0.0004124112,0.7250809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96207845,0.00027694687,0.00027929645,0.024866194,0.00046247945,0.0001106436,0.000116139876,0.000021562648,0.011788257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99239117,0.00076158193,0.0016630867,0.0014370937,0.0017321091,0.0020149762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99580026,0.00061300147,0.0005345815,0.0012950898,0.0010979206,0.0006591328],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002259622,0.0008775448,0.00079036766,0.00059068954,0.011882846,0.0015383533,0.001804283,0.0008380164,0.0034398842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008826501,0.00075006206,0.0007248197,0.0019841224,0.028922332,0.0028560257,0.00059084385,0.0010372291,0.0009979343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021302752,0.0004612213,0.015073642,0.000063294676,0.00036125857,0.000014271429,0.0029837703,0.00019014614,0.00003058342,0.947764,0.030541541,0.0023032823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029425675,0.00014957339,0.0029578442,0.000765172,0.0006007761,0.000031222447,0.034679458,0.001293219,0.00018345923,0.16658339,0.78855896,0.0012543551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009624325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021271815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95426935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011412692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006505709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416019417","doi":"10.21991/cf29506","title":"Surveillance Capitalism and the Charter: Infusing the Common Law with Charter Values","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Premise; Capitalism; Common law; Context (archaeology); Tort; Common core; Value (mathematics); Private law","score_opus":0.007659276043983735,"score_gpt":0.2519219820825539,"score_spread":0.24426270603857017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416019417","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04645672,0.01930323,0.005560381,0.2172114,0.005100886,0.0037359553,0.0010282049,0.00020321645,0.7014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98271394,0.0010088226,0.00004949135,0.013792383,0.00036058103,0.00014626884,0.00006705978,0.000013103742,0.0018483636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956111,0.0007536847,0.00080423226,0.00073325384,0.00093169074,0.001166065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974976,0.00094317156,0.00034522527,0.0007033346,0.0002219442,0.00028867944],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018545389,0.0006230433,0.00069942937,0.00011736884,0.009584929,0.0006928303,0.00080186664,0.0003193213,0.00017154797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014203765,0.00037849604,0.00026336353,0.00063709915,0.08703843,0.00089372747,0.00049353746,0.0006713085,0.00012206804],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029348402,0.00009264109,0.011952906,0.000031065716,0.0002797566,0.000011526267,0.0020056448,0.00019123123,0.00001092516,0.9799093,0.004551228,0.0006702884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006793465,0.00011584272,0.0020342222,0.00060338393,0.00035211816,0.00024188925,0.016544295,0.0006929038,0.000054942073,0.24168883,0.7299711,0.0009070063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004312644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008672498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9362572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039838732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018388034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416019422","doi":"10.21991/cf29503","title":"The Constitutional Status of Overbreadth: A Reply to Professor Stewart","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Norm (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Supreme court; Constitutional law; Charter","score_opus":0.02341658620626918,"score_gpt":0.3074552228880814,"score_spread":0.28403863668181223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416019422","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037447205,0.033008352,0.074945726,0.14317417,0.02751134,0.006610512,0.0044161016,0.00041937619,0.7061697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97894555,0.0049117026,0.00067287165,0.00861325,0.00061655894,0.0006434384,0.00012381675,0.000019013045,0.005453821],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98794097,0.0006509191,0.0031415964,0.0017793416,0.0026786847,0.0038085177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99055094,0.0025836832,0.0010475935,0.0012193199,0.0034410767,0.0011573748],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021701239,0.0012359713,0.0015585289,0.0006914957,0.016944183,0.0005185055,0.0018719924,0.00067232444,0.0005010868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069046477,0.0010712802,0.0011048823,0.0040525477,0.100406684,0.0011376172,0.0014996672,0.0011054033,0.0006562585],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000841276,0.0005827976,0.022984494,0.000089150344,0.0011255932,0.000026574666,0.00046630466,0.00070578244,0.00014147241,0.8937898,0.07584587,0.0034008531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021436033,0.00018972221,0.0019955318,0.0015982478,0.0004426803,0.00004476779,0.014211387,0.00008374701,0.00031871055,0.14232144,0.83564025,0.0010098845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044631297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004719484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97520083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002141259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034531992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99917376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416019425","doi":"10.21991/cf29502","title":"What is Sovereignty?","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Assertion; Politics; Rule of law; Reading (process); De facto; Popular sovereignty","score_opus":0.027474278321987313,"score_gpt":0.32437231349692264,"score_spread":0.29689803517493535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416019425","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010539492,0.016251134,0.02368012,0.1775655,0.037211612,0.0023143408,0.0016217154,0.00035408774,0.73994756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93544096,0.0072127753,0.000270047,0.025257556,0.000702051,0.00011952636,0.00016439511,0.000022974957,0.03080973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99160343,0.00036711016,0.0019156401,0.0016506115,0.0014633737,0.00299982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955377,0.0005871589,0.0005728649,0.001165721,0.0011086456,0.0010279203],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010445315,0.0010706232,0.0011280593,0.0007998931,0.009169391,0.0024728132,0.0014910954,0.0011932498,0.0067500826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045314524,0.0012206545,0.0010346374,0.0017728268,0.02544484,0.0037780334,0.0007004162,0.001202878,0.0014816363],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008421527,0.0003638762,0.0031796985,0.000118216405,0.00037994824,0.000045165303,0.00075687584,0.000099920675,0.000012419359,0.87784123,0.11348747,0.0036309576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015539166,0.0000513469,0.00013695357,0.0011108537,0.00021408318,0.000044783676,0.015384627,0.00035556013,0.00013028139,0.38097295,0.5992056,0.0008390346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018722116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012756714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93438697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015571675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014822048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99929583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416019431","doi":"10.21991/cf29505","title":"The Charter’s Forgotten Weapon: Reclaiming Section 28 For Trans Equality","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Identity (music); Legislature; Face (sociological concept); Constitutional law; Constitutional right","score_opus":0.04191491100674879,"score_gpt":0.3275828716107907,"score_spread":0.2856679606040419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416019431","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032598206,0.014669733,0.40756762,0.32277307,0.043208856,0.008989656,0.002077398,0.00067534053,0.1967785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98199064,0.0023242366,0.00071054377,0.0025083404,0.001449072,0.0012382815,0.0001737983,0.00002273075,0.009582345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99209464,0.00060495036,0.001987164,0.0014682186,0.0012483933,0.0025966652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99378276,0.0026593725,0.00070589234,0.0006906288,0.0017173394,0.0004440378],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029491675,0.0009967395,0.0010463957,0.0002469232,0.037398074,0.0009864994,0.0012730537,0.00093936245,0.00019794378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028701732,0.0008092914,0.0013431335,0.0014081541,0.024301067,0.0015843357,0.00038821483,0.0009811679,0.000095168536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038452802,0.00020891537,0.0032953767,0.00015278332,0.0007811963,0.0000033502693,0.0016906834,0.00028099932,0.00024653945,0.94365454,0.039628636,0.009672435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027471532,0.00012865425,0.0007784867,0.00063341483,0.00052666967,0.000020718062,0.033962473,0.0013150693,0.0002452833,0.046457723,0.9122004,0.0009839607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001371666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006267044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97873086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023826028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004420421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416019433","doi":"10.21991/cf29500","title":"Editorial Introduction","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.021920956872984437,"score_gpt":0.3137978572957482,"score_spread":0.29187690042276376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416019433","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00043368957,0.0054269447,0.04224804,0.09203657,0.5444813,0.0014761995,0.0005636975,0.0004042547,0.31292936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84106755,0.0020047473,0.00042217597,0.00391923,0.1341595,0.00020707467,0.00027231564,0.000021050964,0.017926335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920231,0.00050884124,0.0017512254,0.0017592883,0.001840672,0.002116867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99577826,0.0006280668,0.0005140918,0.0008757095,0.0017065726,0.000497298],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018482707,0.0009520436,0.0010959664,0.00074027595,0.010223203,0.00059196417,0.0010408846,0.0011730031,0.0009870086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031940823,0.0010489977,0.0006943267,0.0021039322,0.031802546,0.0014699363,0.0006805216,0.0011158689,0.00081869826],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015247385,0.0002775002,0.0020788626,0.00005581656,0.00036796,0.0000045644633,0.001018361,0.00018628399,0.000050362985,0.5297009,0.46482596,0.0012810001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020600834,0.00010445089,0.00011054655,0.0001875316,0.0003435586,0.000021023547,0.060930815,0.00011946931,0.00009882079,0.054147102,0.8809754,0.0009011604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007404432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009550117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84063387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016552062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011964784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W45237071","doi":"10.21991/c9vq1b","title":"NAFTA AND FEDERALISM IN THE UNITED STATES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; New Federalism; International trade; Business; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.04505384410287,"score_gpt":0.282225762482526,"score_spread":0.237171918379656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W45237071","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1654808,0.00054413994,0.008728424,0.05375064,0.0022035912,0.0011107064,0.00013435204,0.00019187546,0.76785547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99441355,0.00022444277,0.0005866871,0.0040461,0.00007633656,0.00005432904,0.00013835823,0.0000037239488,0.00045648142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983694,0.00013368975,0.0003113645,0.0002552656,0.00045430256,0.00047599332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932635,0.00017978216,0.00008090037,0.00011724976,0.00019578898,0.00009992044],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006806268,0.00016351015,0.00013653732,0.00027181188,0.0016462434,0.00013577793,0.00035533015,0.00011129682,0.00033866474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025785126,0.00013068617,0.000058618672,0.00044199676,0.0048276624,0.0005122964,0.00007769406,0.00020143128,0.00008666371],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023291215,0.00006103375,0.026544522,0.0000030773601,0.000018819283,0.000026538959,0.003473162,0.000024760351,0.0000040739715,0.9662324,0.003447775,0.00014052173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011298864,0.00003629896,0.012976003,0.000115167786,0.000020436692,0.00009695922,0.030167017,0.00032828897,0.000050029576,0.30879956,0.6458218,0.00045850934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034859395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031618841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82893276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012209718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066646107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W46369315","doi":"10.21991/c9967g","title":"THE CHRISTIAN RIGHT, THE FEDERAL COURTS, AND THE CONSTITUTION IN THE UNITED STATES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Protestantism; Abortion; White (mutation); Christian right; Civil rights; Boy Scouts; Constitutional right; Politics","score_opus":0.022264657064799985,"score_gpt":0.2659809177190766,"score_spread":0.24371626065427662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W46369315","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016658982,0.0065560695,0.028876742,0.19138812,0.0039610937,0.003861669,0.0005158579,0.00027195367,0.7479095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883367,0.0013264369,0.00013170173,0.009054012,0.00031031802,0.0002635489,0.00010668896,0.0000075128014,0.00046310268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99547815,0.0011574771,0.00076815987,0.00045425526,0.00096269365,0.0011792337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954703,0.0029690452,0.00032361876,0.0005860882,0.00043740778,0.00021356846],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033238132,0.00040727018,0.00034504064,0.00014825286,0.015706765,0.0005569563,0.001272946,0.00019809042,0.00014905464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012656536,0.0001919739,0.00022953418,0.00071177224,0.096634716,0.0005048131,0.00020090688,0.0007827651,0.000076232536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016581402,0.00006874452,0.0041545136,0.0000044980957,0.00007741491,0.000027298745,0.00221744,0.00017130825,6.9409305e-7,0.9841951,0.008700532,0.00021660289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014259404,0.000030867224,0.0009043091,0.000055613058,0.00007907978,0.0002626654,0.029442618,0.00036909216,0.000004914309,0.12453063,0.8425802,0.00031405242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01993767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010052105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9716777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026231364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044454383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98658866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W49700271","doi":"10.21991/c9n08w","title":"CANADA AND QUEBEC PLAYING CONSTITUTIONAL CHICKEN: THE VIEW FROM AN AUSTRALIAN PEDESTRIAN","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Sport and Mega-Event Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pedestrian; Political science; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.051733363307554785,"score_gpt":0.2851554098296786,"score_spread":0.23342204652212378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W49700271","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6074231,0.0041053747,0.016609143,0.051065743,0.013662548,0.0037228167,0.0036309592,0.00074662984,0.29903364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99444634,0.00012033283,0.00056811183,0.0031226347,0.00044937298,0.000059944254,0.00031943794,0.000009959784,0.0009038465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965779,0.00018881809,0.00062871294,0.0006304831,0.0008962331,0.0010778628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979716,0.00024070441,0.00026455297,0.00043020397,0.00028080167,0.0008121185],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066892285,0.0004217268,0.00039994007,0.00012757441,0.004880338,0.00023316342,0.00062557217,0.00026793053,0.001604453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004636768,0.00035419207,0.00013624004,0.0003817068,0.017662268,0.0013870134,0.00013277023,0.00044334185,0.000060920007],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005442863,0.000082030594,0.05543137,0.000006723321,0.00008554757,0.00006319036,0.0005444876,0.000023422595,0.000028569882,0.93604213,0.0065106326,0.0011274404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011354227,0.000038630467,0.019492034,0.00015746246,0.00013216893,0.00014063633,0.004624762,0.000039636045,0.0000876824,0.01418524,0.95928633,0.00068001245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9297338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9801747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95277566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006080091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020450145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W54976218","doi":"10.21991/c9xh41","title":"MEECH LAKE AND DEMOCRATIC POLITICS: SOME OBSERVATIONS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Democracy; Political science; Public administration; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.061372101877120666,"score_gpt":0.27173557835971446,"score_spread":0.2103634764825938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W54976218","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02988528,0.0010099458,0.037247617,0.021808945,0.002882988,0.0011167091,0.00062799314,0.0005733175,0.9048472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98997605,0.00012827852,0.0029981001,0.0044174646,0.0002853327,0.00009104143,0.000058206348,0.000008307754,0.0020372486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762267,0.00010611488,0.000499077,0.0004349847,0.00031501587,0.0010221103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853635,0.00025509263,0.000116853385,0.00025986278,0.00023574928,0.00059607363],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043463084,0.00025400627,0.00029564736,0.00018574012,0.0029881364,0.00010194041,0.0003134623,0.00025284183,0.0006759674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008636077,0.00026810737,0.00013713705,0.00022955216,0.011194356,0.0014776728,0.00014651961,0.00024737002,0.00022047479],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007942628,0.00008992986,0.015617094,0.000010937959,0.000045542427,0.000013596725,0.00035014702,0.0000036754795,0.000013401926,0.9813014,0.0021840902,0.00036223023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005788652,0.000031959655,0.003398376,0.000056335397,0.000057761587,0.00005189038,0.0024092572,0.000079795864,0.000069732836,0.7089479,0.2839341,0.00038402854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00080324564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025079187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96009076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017641841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020800193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W58397629","doi":"10.21991/c9pm3h","title":"RIGHTS BROUGHT HOME: THE UNITED KINGDOM ADOPTS A \"CHARTER OF RIGHTS\"","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Kingdom; Law; Political science; Human rights; Public administration","score_opus":0.05191623041426489,"score_gpt":0.2862027304870549,"score_spread":0.23428650007279003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W58397629","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18379816,0.0007237012,0.06757988,0.010072304,0.008119553,0.0021737355,0.00047227595,0.00062499166,0.7264354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978336,0.000034709636,0.0005537905,0.0005930795,0.00028560206,0.00006306799,0.00007419239,0.000007601295,0.0005543695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99707913,0.00020270576,0.00069174706,0.00043894266,0.0008048324,0.00078262534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980461,0.0002246133,0.00034111794,0.00047022654,0.0006566951,0.0002612651],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006809382,0.00031256012,0.00035302344,0.0003530034,0.003876555,0.00008822935,0.0006439582,0.00028300242,0.0013891478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013542308,0.00023159862,0.0003133286,0.0009267709,0.012060848,0.0007417582,0.00013248344,0.0003322411,0.00019334],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008468105,0.00017340011,0.0057796733,0.0000070595543,0.00010007322,0.000015318314,0.0015485843,0.000024849513,0.000048643782,0.9878973,0.0041250857,0.00019537349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010191771,0.00007023002,0.001703714,0.00012803978,0.00010406559,0.00005942317,0.0011766757,0.00011211386,0.00040161618,0.105787136,0.8890489,0.0003889445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01357429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046076123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88492376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018568056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010362606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W593107511","doi":"10.21991/c9k957","title":"QUÉBEC AND ENGLISH CANADA: THE POLITICS OF TERRITORY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Geography; Ethnology; History; Law","score_opus":0.02826247390543992,"score_gpt":0.2152937621697477,"score_spread":0.18703128826430776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W593107511","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022935431,0.015136557,0.002410679,0.009096092,0.0058530457,0.0007149435,0.0003747328,0.00014038569,0.94333816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975017,0.00017642544,0.00014477145,0.0007167153,0.00029951625,0.000024249792,0.0000059354384,0.0000037544876,0.001126937],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984951,0.00007946827,0.00032026687,0.00020180458,0.00042606203,0.00047728437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989525,0.00022354802,0.00012491476,0.0001547149,0.00037457957,0.00016976017],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026805868,0.0001540656,0.00021805236,0.00005006484,0.0028036686,0.000025468637,0.0002722196,0.000101164376,0.00014710176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008012379,0.0001256182,0.000083493185,0.00015204889,0.0154849505,0.00021261792,0.000107917775,0.00016199882,0.000004317072],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005359326,0.000029873312,0.031009588,0.0000062723498,0.00005273656,0.0000042684956,0.003960063,0.00000250461,0.0000021564645,0.9428134,0.021861123,0.0002526574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032903292,0.000021887216,0.005250475,0.000040136303,0.000046958095,0.0000070029755,0.028723627,0.000008952287,0.00004729728,0.019722382,0.945581,0.00022122235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93242884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9713693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9745663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005293933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008865511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99849457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W597023446","doi":"10.21991/c9n95v","title":"The Applicability of Section 7 of the Charter to Oil and Gas Development in Alberta","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Context (archaeology); Human rights; Notice; Law; Section (typography); Political science; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology; History; Business","score_opus":0.018106264116662503,"score_gpt":0.2447264006003403,"score_spread":0.2266201364836778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W597023446","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5986414,0.00020590481,0.0012649242,0.012386901,0.0010715042,0.00061124546,0.000056140303,0.000021212112,0.3857408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99873066,0.00005534079,0.0002494198,0.00024379362,0.00003357118,0.000066545224,0.0000025367397,0.0000023830057,0.00061577145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987771,0.00008442595,0.00037111717,0.00019197389,0.00026999804,0.00030541708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938196,0.00015487889,0.00011440637,0.00020145216,0.00005341933,0.00009389491],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004875094,0.00010919593,0.00014128542,0.000048326117,0.0009930267,0.000012244055,0.0002485188,0.00008801058,0.000059912276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020118675,0.00007495796,0.00006329547,0.00022901913,0.0061992705,0.0001423777,0.00014402585,0.000106545456,0.000014120303],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030792497,0.00006486145,0.080109976,0.000008570802,0.000011756685,1.6306167e-7,0.0016134616,0.000012016566,0.0001836663,0.9135091,0.00009961717,0.004356054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009021768,0.000055048236,0.074838676,0.00019145817,0.000026771266,0.000019257646,0.0053962567,0.00001767741,0.005811313,0.028939875,0.8834364,0.00036512225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004274949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029608151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88456917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014406149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062368205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99650526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W59782060","doi":"10.21991/c9jh37","title":"Where did Trudeau go wrong? On the Question of Nationalism and Charter Patriotism in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nationalism; Patriotism; Universalism; Charter; Political science; Politics; Commit; Loyalty; Liberalism; Democracy; Law; Political economy; Sociology","score_opus":0.015528198266479224,"score_gpt":0.21892409791808665,"score_spread":0.20339589965160743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W59782060","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23716524,0.005990079,0.0026138162,0.055831823,0.0069161416,0.0022227336,0.0016416467,0.00012676678,0.6874918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99796355,0.00029167143,0.00006439264,0.00084622897,0.0000673662,0.000037278776,0.000019648247,0.0000043111286,0.0007055557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983535,0.00013141206,0.0003592657,0.0002641596,0.0005161786,0.00037549424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915594,0.0001874216,0.00014795171,0.00017031455,0.00017494467,0.00016341452],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004737618,0.00013816562,0.00018909224,0.00031618084,0.0013764467,0.000066023655,0.00023075451,0.00011213166,0.0008073137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031917883,0.00014016104,0.00006614523,0.00029455224,0.005401863,0.0003635215,0.000039330433,0.00021542932,0.00003539534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020942509,0.0000341775,0.022118174,0.000010416399,0.000016607539,0.000014586006,0.00068386307,0.000022290476,0.0000085881275,0.96883553,0.0075741233,0.00066069746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010353761,0.000053221927,0.039246842,0.00038437455,0.00003822615,0.000040103663,0.00725258,0.00009529921,0.00003904971,0.046819083,0.90451074,0.000485127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9612326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92201644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016946495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010357728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W59807012","doi":"10.21991/c9fh39","title":"THE STATUS AND RIGHTS OF THE JAMES BAY CREES IN THE CONTEXT OF QUÉBEC SECESSION FROM CANADA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"African Botany and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Grand Council of the Crees","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Bay; Context (archaeology); Political science; Sociology; Law; Geography; Archaeology; Politics","score_opus":0.014939260237199272,"score_gpt":0.1890420072060619,"score_spread":0.17410274696886263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W59807012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98589724,0.0024457357,0.000010939897,0.006443556,0.00037782345,0.0002673654,0.0003755672,0.000007329508,0.0041744253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99929196,0.00010497173,0.0000137322795,0.0004947301,0.000025746294,0.000023427388,0.000010514927,3.341925e-7,0.000034579833],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876577,0.00011064898,0.0003531893,0.00018673736,0.00023485674,0.00034882448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986412,0.0008986765,0.00019944369,0.000100863894,0.000108650645,0.00005116808],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018622601,0.00013950755,0.00019958826,0.000008897859,0.0014187017,0.000012879403,0.0003747333,0.000070261216,0.00007635437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022046665,0.0000385602,0.00007312113,0.00019094434,0.0057015345,0.000109604145,0.00015762767,0.00013871657,0.0000013974908],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005344409,0.000043476568,0.635536,0.000001845383,0.00003697494,0.000001983889,0.00031214836,0.000003013847,0.00041659814,0.36123905,0.0012380446,0.0011174253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036393627,0.00007102483,0.8737631,0.00006764873,0.00003472648,0.000014601127,0.026874693,0.000018710216,0.00087872933,0.012524477,0.08523201,0.00015637957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6690164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9841003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34871456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007060385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005618343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W60483583","doi":"10.21991/c9096b","title":"FREE SPEECH AND ITS HARMS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"History and Theory of Mathematics","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Free speech; Linguistics; Psychology; Speech recognition; Computer science; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.06823700513136713,"score_gpt":0.27140224038302335,"score_spread":0.20316523525165622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W60483583","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10995311,0.0025451714,0.17781022,0.0020563577,0.0035334188,0.0018156912,0.0009222398,0.0010787932,0.700285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97723556,0.000042529966,0.02033145,0.00047370448,0.00010403143,0.000041555948,0.00002001793,0.000022280485,0.0017288591],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773926,0.00007289737,0.0006423525,0.0004917792,0.0004239834,0.00062975247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982993,0.00031614443,0.00023371971,0.00058938336,0.00025195262,0.00030951403],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005846119,0.00040104552,0.00045151263,0.00022696282,0.0010556037,0.00004324605,0.00050988194,0.00023976449,0.0013619777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001462101,0.00037818865,0.00018369702,0.00020293178,0.0034167068,0.00063707866,0.00030076446,0.00032577835,0.00034618514],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058533242,0.0002381886,0.00045464133,0.000096948286,0.00009342656,0.00007536883,0.00035938434,0.0000015722227,0.00019624378,0.98919874,0.0088254465,0.0004015107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00133383,0.00006937643,0.000041447736,0.0001853265,0.00011358118,0.001152539,0.0008966899,0.00020797238,0.0023589903,0.9509412,0.04216185,0.0005371745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000933259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003811436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86728245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001205777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045657714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W605094940","doi":"10.21991/c9th5g","title":"COMMITTEE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF CANADA V. CANADA: EXPRESSION ON PUBLIC PROPERTY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Property (philosophy); Expression (computer science); Political science; Public administration; Law; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.07212678137162992,"score_gpt":0.2714665961266507,"score_spread":0.19933981475502077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W605094940","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020515302,0.0038173725,0.022827629,0.33955866,0.014756428,0.009843302,0.0037291383,0.00038240274,0.58456975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959922,0.000059345028,0.0004714007,0.0020642565,0.00014318357,0.00024386524,0.00003554893,0.000007693596,0.0009825403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970874,0.00015325272,0.000542128,0.00034759165,0.00095782516,0.0009117884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99752265,0.000774722,0.0003072477,0.0003205234,0.00078121084,0.0002936157],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059494947,0.00027681122,0.00036137854,0.000046884164,0.0062460797,0.000043928347,0.0007007564,0.00012931977,0.00020642586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015539345,0.00016121946,0.00014437424,0.00027120992,0.0058213184,0.00031171658,0.0001523179,0.0002674156,0.000004495077],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006334398,0.00007395466,0.010372187,0.000017534896,0.0000762705,0.0000033644253,0.0004900393,0.000065320324,0.000018634602,0.8394721,0.14882278,0.0005244612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008611735,0.00005832905,0.003896807,0.00012260838,0.000041045576,0.000006647521,0.017765367,0.00010144985,0.00050930685,0.0021156494,0.97415125,0.000370358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9778981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99760467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97547686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014408722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017532196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W610879667","doi":"10.21991/c9rh33","title":"CLASS ROOMS, COURT ROOMS, WAR ROOMS, CELLS: MADAM JUSTICE LOUISE ARBOUR, CANADA’S NEWEST COURT JUSTICE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Art, Politics, and Modernism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Madam; Economic Justice; Law; Class (philosophy); Art; Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0439238115492658,"score_gpt":0.231895329779609,"score_spread":0.1879715182303432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W610879667","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027120954,0.0037070082,0.041967288,0.011395343,0.02767237,0.0018014332,0.0072924234,0.00089104613,0.902561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9710408,0.0003241122,0.001025291,0.009859059,0.002210568,0.00012311788,0.0007032483,0.000074030286,0.014639782],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993723,0.00014277302,0.0014377384,0.0011790743,0.0012625962,0.0022548463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959336,0.00032451912,0.00055577286,0.0009867331,0.0011545888,0.0010447815],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047977167,0.0010528704,0.00090420333,0.00035606913,0.0047937054,0.00027180297,0.0010086437,0.00040280636,0.0023791515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034254367,0.0010589834,0.00040200245,0.000041960382,0.009195701,0.0012563412,0.00037835064,0.00097385334,0.00084051053],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011282106,0.00026938348,0.00039936954,0.00016087883,0.00021500344,0.00021069638,0.0022929362,0.00062044186,0.000040705407,0.73122203,0.26430675,0.00014899427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018816611,0.00012894956,0.00016109798,0.00024663354,0.0012100303,0.0002990654,0.01419279,0.0025903136,0.00025803063,0.012689375,0.96490943,0.0014326277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15215977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7300729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9683287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010777897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009770733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W612954220","doi":"10.21991/c9695t","title":"La gestion de la diversité religieuse en milieu scolaire : le modèle « Made in Alberta »","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Religious Education and Schools","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Sociology; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.02373545638127282,"score_gpt":0.2656441628089217,"score_spread":0.2419087064276489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W612954220","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13397324,0.008656337,0.014402661,0.04839647,0.0045991363,0.0011330813,0.00019565831,0.00020770026,0.7884357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98390913,0.002740971,0.0025700885,0.0010285544,0.00022270193,0.00010845817,0.00006170731,0.00002029882,0.009338079],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953955,0.0013173961,0.0007543514,0.0007433341,0.00058130926,0.0012081142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973315,0.0011682591,0.0002546192,0.00043321776,0.00022743552,0.00058495277],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016824406,0.00047633893,0.00045734821,0.00042333934,0.0018124146,0.00018504995,0.0007446544,0.0011231522,0.00060552085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016892878,0.0005646639,0.0003300401,0.00092763884,0.012936818,0.000878055,0.00024162816,0.001004517,0.00088488124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000084318446,0.00042004258,0.09200772,0.00003697985,0.00006861814,0.00009544027,0.006240173,0.00066067814,0.000051943523,0.8653458,0.032872904,0.0021154324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040870844,0.000120789264,0.051165666,0.0017241196,0.00023042753,0.00076972076,0.029608203,0.0012489733,0.0003605649,0.4591263,0.44981372,0.0017444248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039487492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007397456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8499359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001340112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00929299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W614001618","doi":"10.21991/c97t0d","title":"APPLYING THE CHARTER: WHAT IS GOVERNMENT?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Economic Zones and Regional Development","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04622712696463133,"score_gpt":0.20015380396568644,"score_spread":0.1539266770010551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W614001618","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013592291,0.025696525,0.1408193,0.03398811,0.01629692,0.00457866,0.001496995,0.00036339098,0.7631678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863845,0.001337504,0.0010899701,0.008314769,0.000154747,0.00086765114,0.000040691786,0.000017114526,0.0017930664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758464,0.000014946482,0.00091617205,0.0006561642,0.00015451352,0.00067353464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877274,0.00006425808,0.00040642163,0.00050982146,0.000064622356,0.00018211469],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046570282,0.00033749052,0.00041285902,0.00011256457,0.0011508855,0.0002103152,0.00055469305,0.00016857169,0.0020388952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046658828,0.00029437157,0.00030816757,0.00020803738,0.0023889453,0.0012777605,0.00023155942,0.00025591263,0.0031794128],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024591152,0.00009135044,0.026745187,0.000011028189,0.0001484647,0.000008953384,0.00022429244,0.000021255782,0.0000062612776,0.9638052,0.0064693075,0.0024441115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000870446,0.000034307923,0.002737749,0.00009591318,0.000017124692,0.00019164332,0.0026453198,0.0005242775,0.00017861654,0.16802305,0.8241307,0.00055084645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000075227756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024824398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9727922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033651007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022046862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W619025002","doi":"10.21991/c90d4m","title":"WAR AND PEACE- AN ISRAELI PERSPECTIVE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Offensive; Law of war; Spanish Civil War; International law; State (computer science); Just war theory; Independence (probability theory); Parliament; Politics","score_opus":0.04961020433464609,"score_gpt":0.2930853557797872,"score_spread":0.24347515144514115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W619025002","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031340245,0.021294247,0.02354462,0.0042609097,0.0025343006,0.000919045,0.0002231055,0.0005102205,0.9153733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959426,0.00072863325,0.0013920056,0.00086015137,0.00025349212,0.0000533228,0.000018019276,0.000008927956,0.00074283365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977594,0.00012402429,0.00032094252,0.0005706387,0.0004379384,0.0007870506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986014,0.00007474725,0.000116752184,0.0002481329,0.00052576396,0.00043325213],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042379388,0.0002774877,0.0002895102,0.00018406162,0.0029907448,0.00007291219,0.000295927,0.00018472451,0.00017617409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004403133,0.0002749912,0.0001221905,0.0002708291,0.012499088,0.0012134563,0.00016557939,0.00022542481,0.00021770479],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003996419,0.00012798699,0.05914233,0.000004872133,0.000066197994,0.00002234167,0.0034861541,0.000002019973,0.000022536813,0.93392724,0.00088607206,0.0022723007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002201922,0.00027718063,0.007796244,0.00015096914,0.00016741345,0.00023804595,0.4340182,0.000077231365,0.00016004489,0.23417808,0.31947824,0.0012564419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026947574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061580623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96460235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024609538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011418047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W619485391","doi":"10.21991/c9s36d","title":"CANADIAN COUNCIL OF CHURCHES V. THE QUEEN: PUBLIC INTEREST TAKES A BACK SEAT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Public interest; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.13213460991169035,"score_gpt":0.27124201228967376,"score_spread":0.1391074023779834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W619485391","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022916372,0.0007265587,0.009387745,0.03006137,0.001775417,0.00070821,0.00085582945,0.00011233227,0.9540809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918401,0.00008331169,0.00094356603,0.0026178288,0.0002418811,0.00006178841,0.00006366711,0.000011352083,0.0041364995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963658,0.00025028057,0.0006904373,0.0004529958,0.0009444462,0.0012960818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964883,0.00036849725,0.00028479545,0.0004968153,0.0015619075,0.0007996917],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011047899,0.00035533187,0.00040193662,0.00023324315,0.0030667486,0.00012781248,0.0009806677,0.00027408762,0.0029488215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015387434,0.00029527588,0.00030769708,0.0006718498,0.03022555,0.0008014549,0.00010651582,0.0003896004,0.00051109336],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025266123,0.00008819869,0.021785853,0.000011929765,0.00011000766,0.000016439455,0.0008131094,0.000011725447,0.000012038253,0.96581376,0.011009491,0.00030217244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004213649,0.00004966163,0.00051278836,0.00008517483,0.00005541096,0.000077492776,0.009546063,0.000017459168,0.0000643713,0.014521609,0.9742488,0.00039979536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20066242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40060496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98954844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022915546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07965554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W626926647","doi":"10.21991/c9pq1s","title":"JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE AND JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION: THE CASE OF PROVINCIAL COURT JUDGES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial independence; Judicial discretion; Judicial activism; Political science; Administration (probate law); Independence (probability theory); Judicial opinion; Law; Judicial review; Supreme court; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.03777566139922089,"score_gpt":0.2853693183396633,"score_spread":0.24759365694044239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W626926647","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19730903,0.0037309641,0.02152616,0.023407053,0.005122262,0.0028380079,0.0009334024,0.00038664285,0.7447465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99783564,0.00018598835,0.0004547511,0.00073971885,0.0005894847,0.00009992321,0.000018474442,0.00000725288,0.00006875267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99716896,0.00018670186,0.0007176378,0.0005094389,0.0007185011,0.0006987621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980994,0.00029081738,0.00034284923,0.000258744,0.0007500868,0.00025813133],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094433513,0.00032518647,0.00041492877,0.0001641077,0.005259226,0.000085287924,0.00042228802,0.0002926163,0.0003798766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009946264,0.00027142622,0.00018950367,0.0005023597,0.028231671,0.00070198235,0.0002537205,0.00038656127,0.00005072368],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016123691,0.00015325451,0.024338737,0.00000912624,0.000099287136,0.00034578404,0.0011369658,0.000005395348,0.00002175361,0.9701155,0.0015164161,0.0020965387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031515642,0.0006476303,0.013315793,0.00032231022,0.0006519225,0.0063483138,0.071325645,0.000119023796,0.0007988917,0.7725586,0.1290098,0.0017504641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010820779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037254006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8005266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017003766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004655705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6295017","doi":"10.21991/c9rq35","title":"QUEBEC AFTER MEECH: ON THE THRESHOLD","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.033636771087916975,"score_gpt":0.19350156531826143,"score_spread":0.15986479423034444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6295017","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021945715,0.0007388848,0.00080969627,0.0060434365,0.0028936206,0.0005617669,0.0007621915,0.00019401478,0.9660507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834885,0.000016098686,0.00009177738,0.0092976615,0.0003467796,0.00019710179,0.00009103747,0.0000137455445,0.0064573116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982289,0.000036315723,0.00038263376,0.00041044573,0.00035549526,0.00058619527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991483,0.00009128288,0.0000806372,0.00045374702,0.00008231972,0.00014371761],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015369097,0.0003458384,0.00021848959,0.000116165145,0.0015401627,0.00021823186,0.0003599935,0.000113908995,0.012690659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004882732,0.00023368353,0.00023106512,0.000062968444,0.008108802,0.0006498182,0.00013129134,0.00036790993,0.0020428086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009832155,0.00016803907,0.0018358879,0.0000088688885,0.000054435764,0.000048941292,0.0013226216,0.000008611198,0.000014845606,0.9780985,0.018179026,0.00016188168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006598258,0.00011367421,0.0012804754,0.00020721045,0.000072303825,0.00009242985,0.0060060555,0.00005429253,0.00040505995,0.091259025,0.8992196,0.0006300916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004419627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034534717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9615428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000118338496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019250507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W64644032","doi":"10.21991/c9608v","title":"THE PROSTITUTION REFERENCE: SEXUAL COMMUNICATION AND THE STREETS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Gender, Feminism, and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Sociology; Psychology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.05580050968955305,"score_gpt":0.28828962045819323,"score_spread":0.23248911076864018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W64644032","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027902517,0.008620983,0.01584213,0.02954414,0.002907239,0.003005154,0.000177191,0.00042351993,0.9115771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955237,0.0015549121,0.00047734167,0.00072124385,0.0001405262,0.00022322632,0.000061861494,0.0000063707125,0.0012908309],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99737,0.0004244626,0.00049300253,0.00037286617,0.0006266623,0.0007130303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997916,0.00065372913,0.00023876101,0.0005439434,0.00040636916,0.0002411857],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019815129,0.00024677158,0.00023334227,0.00007985924,0.00887691,0.00021612034,0.0006991666,0.00023100781,0.00011772991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010021654,0.00015797152,0.000092024486,0.00029362476,0.033561867,0.00060521014,0.00023654115,0.00043105322,0.00011006917],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014110349,0.000048410635,0.005505025,0.0000052723576,0.00004758496,0.0000026165053,0.0043998593,0.0000054044467,0.000012914212,0.9824163,0.0031730882,0.004242467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030121321,0.000062520514,0.0031700912,0.00008169563,0.00012824913,0.000100401696,0.10516577,0.00011052799,0.000087504864,0.16030848,0.7272976,0.00047499343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001620499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058023506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96762115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015847506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021581175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9924134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W64685650","doi":"10.21991/c9fq07","title":"CANADA'S QUEST FOR CONSTITUTIONAL PERFECTION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Perfection; Philosophy; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology","score_opus":0.04150483677496133,"score_gpt":0.28082084795185586,"score_spread":0.23931601117689452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W64685650","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007116097,0.0022481035,0.20568095,0.026621386,0.014698971,0.0046926118,0.0026203243,0.0009315681,0.73539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992188,0.00010730551,0.003331068,0.0017033535,0.0005809121,0.00044118933,0.00018747433,0.000011484694,0.0014492531],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99632883,0.00014332277,0.0006752065,0.00070734526,0.0009009241,0.001244369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974767,0.0003748798,0.00026793603,0.00026096628,0.0011456755,0.00047386473],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063031324,0.00044279807,0.00045583808,0.00014073445,0.0069364114,0.00011635509,0.00048159162,0.0003089867,0.0007746638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001646545,0.00042975091,0.00031420044,0.00040752592,0.018436614,0.0009012659,0.00013182138,0.00031926658,0.000112278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087692795,0.000119694865,0.014283376,0.000019372545,0.00013894512,0.000013949267,0.00049436936,0.00008276234,0.000049673843,0.95120054,0.032925613,0.00058402575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014253671,0.000066129374,0.0023841464,0.00010210013,0.000110963374,0.00006623902,0.007171303,0.000099156874,0.00028206475,0.015460985,0.97205496,0.00077655906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39711595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6494029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98507184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018852904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011264249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W64873473","doi":"10.21991/c9kx0j","title":"POLLUTING THE LAW TO PROTECT THE ENVIRONMENT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental law; Law; Environmental science; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.0377926620013333,"score_gpt":0.26271548956084795,"score_spread":0.22492282755951465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W64873473","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005448903,0.0004392164,0.021021415,0.053017512,0.0012147496,0.0022448106,0.00016217696,0.00017030968,0.9162809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98822683,0.00003448876,0.00075364544,0.009136731,0.0002489332,0.00026674,0.00000889536,0.0000090081885,0.0013147038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975736,0.00021808608,0.00036588666,0.00037150556,0.0006128522,0.00085803634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989503,0.00016576164,0.00011998841,0.0004612606,0.000034134875,0.00026852684],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008633217,0.00024464855,0.0001708957,0.000053632364,0.006862122,0.00010435876,0.0007634954,0.0001316317,0.0011276484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018064232,0.000157197,0.00018513329,0.00023872146,0.013488145,0.00034594926,0.0002923395,0.00030409463,0.0015337683],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018901284,0.000060818587,0.002332763,0.0000020369234,0.000034642195,0.0000050411168,0.001781804,0.00013716744,0.00009381101,0.99314153,0.0015728092,0.0008186941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028904708,0.0000463745,0.0009257975,0.000034944926,0.00003638735,0.000032122603,0.006462965,0.000013231757,0.00052193826,0.035544652,0.95579386,0.00029869794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044996594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023013446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98277795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032124552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005228118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W655760337","doi":"10.21991/c9766g","title":"BANQUO'S GHOST AND OTHER CONSTITUTIONAL INCUBUSES: SOME LESSONS FROM THE CHARLOTTETOWN PROCESS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Latin American and Latino Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.05233496453208133,"score_gpt":0.30884644886699547,"score_spread":0.25651148433491416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W655760337","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019011363,0.007978631,0.07818993,0.07005501,0.0048146043,0.0026810158,0.0028681105,0.0010782672,0.8133231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886346,0.0003643878,0.0012611058,0.00875223,0.0004657987,0.00016733307,0.00004908273,0.000012066627,0.00029338032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967666,0.00021077471,0.00058646273,0.0007250348,0.0007858657,0.0009252461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795926,0.0005877252,0.00030573976,0.0004142222,0.00039086503,0.00034219094],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005799695,0.00043455354,0.00044448968,0.00013269814,0.0045782104,0.00022003353,0.0007497804,0.00023602552,0.0011904263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009104411,0.00033751517,0.00018455584,0.00048363896,0.043761346,0.0012744633,0.00029756245,0.00040384562,0.0001864971],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037002603,0.00011798516,0.062774345,0.000006514317,0.00016341501,0.000013507059,0.0037720173,0.000012000776,0.000017368597,0.9287771,0.003058142,0.0012505802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002071266,0.000075659584,0.009156025,0.00030006177,0.00018664442,0.000105936204,0.03628068,0.00017474916,0.00014776646,0.20723559,0.7430593,0.0012063297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003081318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014015096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96962327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018642657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029182103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W67325372","doi":"10.21991/c97h3f","title":"THE NATURE OF EQUALITY: APPLES AND ORANGES / CHESTS AND BREASTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Art","score_opus":0.055230870342649785,"score_gpt":0.3128414258401433,"score_spread":0.2576105554974935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W67325372","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06585678,0.016483642,0.009525457,0.07426195,0.0025500099,0.0013181405,0.0007065625,0.00028250786,0.82901496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980075,0.00055916095,0.00037909794,0.0008046361,0.000118180185,0.000020553396,0.000008640822,0.0000039365073,0.00009828917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835706,0.00013994968,0.00031724956,0.00027414647,0.00039560473,0.0005159793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860024,0.00058594625,0.00011547893,0.00018409542,0.00025312466,0.0002610906],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008973551,0.00016839283,0.00021239514,0.00006677484,0.0023483543,0.00006348135,0.00023554917,0.0003536677,0.000037835023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010158003,0.00012992808,0.00007394035,0.00017710158,0.026282707,0.00037068463,0.00014715371,0.00040229107,0.000010047895],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003894744,0.000039395087,0.013262871,0.000022391352,0.00004031274,0.0000031786321,0.0006864747,6.2365075e-7,0.000024662648,0.9846229,0.000244331,0.0010139388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049491244,0.000039132636,0.0062226066,0.0001102963,0.000052625284,0.00006452632,0.006286557,0.000016164837,0.00021272791,0.890217,0.09601486,0.00026859838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005627179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011026587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9321507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004828626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008662393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W70185218","doi":"10.21991/c9767v","title":"L’exil intérieur des Québécois dans le Canada de la Charte","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016017844713728868,"score_gpt":0.2108758309522723,"score_spread":0.19485798623854345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W70185218","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023612527,0.01738365,0.031158194,0.011535389,0.008638097,0.0005441551,0.0015854205,0.00018109647,0.9053615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9721042,0.0011443063,0.00068858516,0.0018424053,0.00039877492,0.00006688708,0.000049388582,0.000021471296,0.023683991],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99615103,0.00043964878,0.00063568226,0.0006252918,0.0006415427,0.0015068194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977946,0.00022540466,0.0002476398,0.0003922269,0.0003443348,0.0009957734],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079693925,0.0004120319,0.00042869998,0.00040961464,0.0076406216,0.00031409095,0.0006813808,0.000485026,0.002457984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005585739,0.00058712094,0.00031330474,0.0007803905,0.06348948,0.0011938958,0.00014797707,0.00047595278,0.00036547947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003079195,0.0001808842,0.012767853,0.000055282366,0.00013475474,0.00033368263,0.004954403,0.000087111155,0.00003943392,0.9244433,0.05344762,0.0035248925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069774245,0.000036038527,0.0048915753,0.00023285336,0.00012164683,0.0005307453,0.014619822,0.000058443653,0.00005186119,0.054403737,0.92369556,0.0006599923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.998333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99970156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9484917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007803068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08948701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W70809028","doi":"10.21991/c98675","title":"An Opportune Moment: The Judicial Appointment Reforms and the Judicial Credentials Demanded by the Charter","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Law; Charter; Judicial activism; Judicial review; Accountability; Judicial independence; Transparency (behavior); Economic Justice; Appeal; Supreme court; Judicial discretion; Public administration","score_opus":0.03585155082644348,"score_gpt":0.2747012195231658,"score_spread":0.2388496686967223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W70809028","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03134022,0.009531585,0.0568332,0.17061116,0.00791711,0.0065297224,0.0008905515,0.00055775297,0.7157887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915157,0.0008772922,0.00006636834,0.0058385036,0.00083529047,0.00048081463,0.00006685888,0.000011150502,0.00030801367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99585664,0.00046148078,0.0008205652,0.0006223212,0.0011817865,0.0010571904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981058,0.00032296727,0.000372658,0.0005010437,0.00038447446,0.00031306042],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023716565,0.00045237332,0.00049891236,0.00009810033,0.0131164,0.0003076815,0.001019019,0.00022243444,0.00052976835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003301759,0.00023321541,0.00030659678,0.0004468463,0.043516815,0.0008438552,0.0003345601,0.00044717093,0.0001338533],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029738757,0.00016288339,0.0017517183,0.000002973643,0.00021935195,0.000009415524,0.0023051687,0.000008226082,0.000033591194,0.98317415,0.009959649,0.0020755092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003836231,0.0001555235,0.0018728492,0.0000953783,0.00043695554,0.00017947842,0.027439546,0.00012234664,0.00014813337,0.57104033,0.39392826,0.0007449681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00816699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004848373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9601755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024122927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014796241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7195887","doi":"10.21991/c9gh27","title":"NAFTA AND THE FUTURE OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Transboundary Water Resource Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental regulation; International trade; Environmental policy; Political science; Business; Environmental planning; Natural resource economics; Economics; Environmental science","score_opus":0.013025213097747993,"score_gpt":0.21558924670958585,"score_spread":0.20256403361183786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7195887","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12996472,0.007998306,0.073234536,0.03745062,0.0045172945,0.0042995526,0.0005603639,0.0003827743,0.7415918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980538,0.00022862823,0.00073011685,0.00039516203,0.00013279874,0.000038303333,0.000023010318,0.0000050622994,0.00039314033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998377,0.00015481259,0.0003584871,0.00026950552,0.0004712875,0.0003688971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938387,0.00007301683,0.00014750748,0.0002369088,0.00004637434,0.00011231709],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005930864,0.0001656451,0.00020478816,0.00010994497,0.0016179665,0.0000495081,0.00029461648,0.000110818146,0.000617754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039088027,0.00012781582,0.00012588536,0.00016290187,0.020402707,0.00038972741,0.00011543309,0.0001356955,0.00004090972],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012784459,0.00006007208,0.014064626,0.000008187899,0.0000561985,0.000002383782,0.0022977479,0.000027359176,0.000032249012,0.9801575,0.0004020073,0.0027638262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036775724,0.000048780472,0.016617835,0.000065518536,0.00013863956,0.000047928712,0.02331565,0.00014540885,0.00018664033,0.12996735,0.8254002,0.00038851463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032159776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004713482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8680891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010253476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027482904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W76022651","doi":"10.21991/c9bw82","title":"AMENDING THE CANADIAN CONSTITUTION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06688833277426015,"score_gpt":0.2938406459485605,"score_spread":0.22695231317430037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W76022651","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037532304,0.0010784907,0.007239147,0.021606136,0.004384427,0.0013651415,0.0001913829,0.00038789937,0.95999414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952474,0.000118350545,0.0010295922,0.0021382032,0.0003306441,0.00015838095,0.000046434565,0.000007919408,0.00092303415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996495,0.00022181225,0.00053687644,0.00052645215,0.0008065433,0.0014133037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99803144,0.00020502803,0.00020243648,0.00034003853,0.0005922921,0.00062878046],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009404306,0.00036916346,0.00031928287,0.00021264754,0.01593085,0.0002672645,0.0007281275,0.00032109517,0.0013365932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011529509,0.00028408092,0.00026979737,0.00064831384,0.02509745,0.0010182878,0.00015034356,0.0004979135,0.0009394238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016488777,0.000041126405,0.0243957,0.0000043450136,0.00009537386,0.000027205437,0.0025683588,0.000038781316,0.00001715398,0.96418005,0.007985672,0.0006297462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000680592,0.00003074355,0.0041831336,0.000094079085,0.000099019766,0.00008287025,0.02375626,0.00005449435,0.000119721706,0.027305655,0.94293725,0.0006561873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34793073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6854096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99149424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017947285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004917606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7669431","doi":"10.21991/c9308x","title":"CANADA'S PROSPECTS STRESS AND COPING WITH QUEBEC’S IMPENDING REFERENDUM: A REPATRIATION ACT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal Military College of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Repatriation; Coping (psychology); Political science; Law; Psychology; Clinical psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.023112947372169897,"score_gpt":0.24369012312331945,"score_spread":0.22057717575114955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7669431","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19254597,0.0033527857,0.03938902,0.09113413,0.005510944,0.0050298655,0.0074528595,0.00082552386,0.65475893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959474,0.00007575532,0.00042144582,0.0019656173,0.00017195447,0.00004816348,0.00004570758,0.000008199589,0.001315751],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790955,0.000068712005,0.00032476723,0.0004392212,0.00052166823,0.0007360928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988522,0.00010148694,0.00023999946,0.00021496261,0.00020326326,0.00038810002],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024001376,0.00023455577,0.0002453701,0.00012765109,0.0020946914,0.000119271455,0.00021987013,0.00014081076,0.00019323196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037414773,0.00022925834,0.000053653694,0.00033057661,0.003185521,0.00077301014,0.00006218253,0.00021999692,0.000010484832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006074878,0.00002149639,0.049676396,0.000017262913,0.000042073276,0.000049773877,0.0005558809,0.000019808764,0.00000718405,0.9385801,0.010590495,0.00037875384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025205489,0.00009755489,0.05005386,0.0006773507,0.0001234203,0.00021102255,0.004903774,0.0000841962,0.00050568185,0.012182399,0.9273742,0.0012660202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9702781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99663025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92639774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010885671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014504422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W77205083","doi":"10.21991/c95d5j","title":"RELIGIOUS DISCOURSE IN THE PUBLIC SQUARE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Faith; Democracy; Politics; Public discourse; State (computer science); Public reason; Position (finance); Sociology; Separation of church and state; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05265537837368078,"score_gpt":0.32551957380082897,"score_spread":0.2728641954271482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W77205083","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019927733,0.0011951185,0.023081593,0.09138915,0.0041098725,0.0012994997,0.00012508729,0.00034214766,0.8585298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937723,0.0005497811,0.0004574117,0.004450052,0.00017696011,0.00017186746,0.000046361845,0.00000715825,0.00036805155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972442,0.00028373863,0.00050494896,0.0003916119,0.00070914126,0.0008663548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986822,0.00025446728,0.00015072424,0.00039902033,0.00028406866,0.00022950854],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088383426,0.000238824,0.00022552327,0.00022470584,0.0026291467,0.00020840148,0.0007463016,0.00023548068,0.0005984376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00073319976,0.00019211913,0.0003119928,0.0008211809,0.008809669,0.0009765308,0.00008033031,0.00048180588,0.00061485724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018219209,0.00022101452,0.023662634,0.0000032927182,0.000025308202,0.000041405827,0.00513179,0.000009918994,0.0000039173315,0.94043237,0.030075807,0.00037434621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079321663,0.000051102084,0.0012364734,0.000083025574,0.000031247473,0.00017702562,0.1305578,0.00006203394,0.000011827158,0.09629214,0.7702826,0.0004215037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017596504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054358244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97384465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000323901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002018913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99866927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W78933614","doi":"10.21991/c9565g","title":"FEDERALISM AND DEMOCRACY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Democracy; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.045444260375784154,"score_gpt":0.28556565195422384,"score_spread":0.2401213915784397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W78933614","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.072967075,0.0012193995,0.05776847,0.015399469,0.0053983754,0.0014385154,0.00023933307,0.0008538484,0.84471554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923202,0.0001471965,0.0032706868,0.0023879034,0.00019863951,0.000050128143,0.000040540843,0.000011770295,0.0015729547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99718636,0.00013992575,0.00050388766,0.00057490665,0.0006033553,0.0009915387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864537,0.000118447635,0.000183089,0.0003025904,0.0002665759,0.00048391547],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005682734,0.0003168103,0.0003093222,0.00023150833,0.0047835624,0.00017374328,0.00042621946,0.00026151226,0.00086604885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049561635,0.0003156502,0.0001477014,0.00033113352,0.009923032,0.0012792579,0.0002040116,0.00027486522,0.00033285577],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028210377,0.00009783578,0.046013396,0.000006869316,0.000056031666,0.000036329697,0.0009849248,0.000004456547,0.000053855987,0.9472008,0.004515535,0.0010017945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020168738,0.00007049047,0.008235619,0.00017469551,0.000097986696,0.0001464953,0.0061630444,0.00008561387,0.00040032662,0.49150306,0.49010268,0.0010031322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020552073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016883954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9193531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002816652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014993412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W79884336","doi":"10.21991/c9j380","title":"Failing Students by Taking a Pass on the Charter in Pridgen v University of Calgary","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.02695350916186013,"score_gpt":0.2769865945668648,"score_spread":0.2500330854050047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W79884336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7260185,0.0006529572,0.023261817,0.05909259,0.0015784513,0.0026068273,0.00014490935,0.00016535529,0.18647861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985594,0.00006576147,0.00011099989,0.0006329083,0.000038364313,0.000015551617,0.0000129960035,0.0000035510702,0.0005604625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981282,0.00014493408,0.00028312186,0.0003018896,0.00063591544,0.000505942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989659,0.00032583528,0.00017662461,0.00020910092,0.00019207007,0.0001304305],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005653168,0.00015823371,0.0002016867,0.00009948854,0.0013766793,0.00008353048,0.0005879554,0.00012520583,0.0007542191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003773982,0.00013847348,0.00011467806,0.00029080594,0.0046185493,0.0005922052,0.00013903943,0.00023658024,0.00026367747],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026020003,0.00010716105,0.054372095,0.00000739998,0.000021669612,0.000009001147,0.0005196012,0.00005561591,0.00030648103,0.9362585,0.007680188,0.0006362644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003683406,0.00024575842,0.05800363,0.0018477746,0.00014482834,0.00003810681,0.07571918,0.0016478632,0.00081890717,0.03874738,0.81747085,0.001632322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006061234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002052957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8975111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025493905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006749371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W79952626","doi":"10.21991/c9v094","title":"The Unlikely Union of Same-Sex Marriage, Polygamy and the Charter in Court","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Government (linguistics); Test (biology); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030054171413202796,"score_gpt":0.2729775993521866,"score_spread":0.24292342793898378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W79952626","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.111949034,0.012944702,0.009351348,0.1427054,0.0059557334,0.0052514235,0.00035528172,0.00031786872,0.71116924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972045,0.00088948273,0.00022790844,0.000523149,0.00010098439,0.00010010081,0.000007967607,0.0000049683754,0.0009409854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976309,0.00037341643,0.0005385501,0.0003031601,0.0005238199,0.0006301471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985112,0.0006515126,0.00022545595,0.00022946543,0.00025775566,0.0001245891],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016468507,0.00022711408,0.00033284753,0.000074558506,0.003250377,0.00008122978,0.00043779743,0.00015853063,0.00012735774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008771025,0.00013326261,0.00015377185,0.00033541606,0.02775686,0.00042955563,0.00020703685,0.00028568774,0.000038610815],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010025633,0.000045095625,0.027872229,0.000006152912,0.00006219493,0.0000035486412,0.0047628656,0.000008311327,0.000017406393,0.9640701,0.0015068447,0.0015450228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008269304,0.000104772385,0.049408615,0.00033943343,0.0001714511,0.00006685446,0.14377391,0.0003712592,0.00028015045,0.15996534,0.6362668,0.0009820911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005569847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006849692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8852554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019077092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055977143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99804723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W812244214","doi":"10.21991/c9h091","title":"Judicialization or Renunciation? Judges in Today’s Landscape of Anti-Terrorism Laws","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Terrorism; Judicial review; Political science; Constitution; Renunciation; Suspect; Constitutional law; Enforcement","score_opus":0.0675757815920345,"score_gpt":0.33689811964666444,"score_spread":0.2693223380546299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W812244214","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3712869,0.0033833485,0.068764135,0.07755244,0.009784953,0.00299067,0.0005229796,0.00062902836,0.46508557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99803543,0.00013805095,0.00053330464,0.0005289399,0.00022224376,0.00004054274,0.00009195938,0.0000069029475,0.0004026028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99737847,0.00017048037,0.00067675085,0.00037836333,0.0008242484,0.00057166704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983725,0.00021487457,0.00026936593,0.00024103098,0.00064394163,0.00025832054],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011321565,0.00021048886,0.00037989378,0.00031757937,0.00068059796,0.00007350817,0.00034801906,0.00023686206,0.00030766672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023824216,0.00019780928,0.00011152789,0.0008325436,0.003379106,0.0010165728,0.00010158598,0.00017501114,0.00010478324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007967029,0.00010574791,0.19606204,0.000013995808,0.000013787029,0.000019336087,0.00080742675,0.0010005755,0.00003525956,0.7900522,0.011527094,0.00028291205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005540887,0.00029862416,0.022743762,0.0009836848,0.00018096784,0.00014576293,0.05616895,0.0013403419,0.0005758893,0.117647015,0.7929221,0.0014520102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020763755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013328649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.781395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041648685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99933314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W8159521","doi":"10.21991/c9w96d","title":"PUBLIC SCHOOL BOARDS’ ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA V. ALBERTA THE ARGUMENTS FAVOURING CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION FOR ALBERTA’S PUBLIC SCHOOL BOARDS: WOLVES IN SHEEP’S CLOTHING","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Clothing; Public administration; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.11944392349460421,"score_gpt":0.31082140409966746,"score_spread":0.19137748060506327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W8159521","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045175586,0.001972755,0.0556623,0.108616024,0.015246148,0.00784773,0.00039623238,0.00042791525,0.7646553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911625,0.000117057236,0.00093057606,0.0009351251,0.00061400764,0.0009525636,0.00012400917,0.000024698686,0.0051394994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941397,0.0004722049,0.0014576556,0.0009417258,0.0012731191,0.0017156289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951346,0.001575686,0.00093064917,0.0005346752,0.0010872446,0.00073713914],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025542853,0.0005449305,0.0007019169,0.0007415041,0.004064013,0.00033429338,0.0009786945,0.0006795489,0.0011398259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019296987,0.000516674,0.0005169485,0.001077623,0.0076789553,0.002243509,0.00018714511,0.00090121577,0.00021333476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009765531,0.0004382513,0.13613106,0.000038911454,0.00020354862,0.0000018356798,0.0023173825,0.00006311388,0.000051166786,0.8539802,0.0062666824,0.00041022478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0044039213,0.00020273677,0.0055568977,0.0005042593,0.00021302672,0.000054005966,0.021593096,0.00039237435,0.00013236987,0.04677561,0.9188264,0.0013453132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039017897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09205436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94598687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033716583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011633174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W84780611","doi":"10.21991/c9c08d","title":"\"AS I SEE IT, RENE...\" SAID SIR JOHN","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Biblical Studies and Interpretation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.049784026039498934,"score_gpt":0.24590214615749645,"score_spread":0.1961181201179975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W84780611","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020604902,0.0013661506,0.014290282,0.006434092,0.0038266035,0.00050882366,0.00032738337,0.00033362373,0.97085255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98361665,0.00013246381,0.0004919222,0.010832756,0.00047764028,0.00012248974,0.0001342243,0.000016751921,0.0041750884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744445,0.000048985406,0.0006980905,0.00056659227,0.00046264697,0.00077924854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985432,0.0001037445,0.00020787591,0.00035566953,0.0005317074,0.00025778258],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020655953,0.0004158866,0.00039085356,0.00031327124,0.0022351092,0.00020772018,0.00039347567,0.00016002561,0.014528376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002450328,0.00036257505,0.00033337955,0.00019089812,0.0074154567,0.0010529541,0.0002159384,0.00031654284,0.003425428],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094501534,0.00016120297,0.0010505967,0.000016311327,0.00013493274,0.00001299993,0.0016504086,0.0000199415,0.00002374046,0.88519394,0.110521585,0.0011198228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000768447,0.00018160553,0.00018136342,0.00012609421,0.000072975665,0.00007452615,0.006166632,0.0002380248,0.00016213607,0.062184773,0.92932504,0.00051839236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007762728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001433566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9815562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016759262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047717878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W85857415","doi":"10.21991/c9d962","title":"Redressing the Harms of Government (In)Action: A Section 7 Versus Section 15 Charter Showdown","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Redress; Harm; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Supreme court; Action (physics); Framing (construction); Law and economics; Sociology; Business; History","score_opus":0.048625248510399545,"score_gpt":0.30340101101388656,"score_spread":0.254775762503487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W85857415","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5437862,0.002082614,0.023146534,0.08362292,0.036179498,0.0058101113,0.0003288501,0.00056499575,0.30447823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972977,0.00015070422,0.00022864589,0.0002919218,0.00075611594,0.0002637261,0.00001852733,0.0000070012948,0.0009856339],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99713975,0.00019093396,0.000577729,0.00040859677,0.0010224481,0.0006605233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986828,0.0003042619,0.000296647,0.00022413599,0.00035213638,0.0001400186],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005397588,0.00026670494,0.00030155593,0.0000794164,0.0028915196,0.00017492624,0.0002861307,0.00023820791,0.0007773191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005819593,0.00020416918,0.0002175002,0.0005025063,0.005730405,0.0013445324,0.0001241026,0.00039851322,0.000113784365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018045703,0.00019337074,0.028685888,0.000028641884,0.00016615883,0.0000046133646,0.002404714,0.0011494453,0.0019118398,0.94512767,0.015407543,0.0047396463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006945911,0.00027762944,0.06737727,0.00061358814,0.00022421862,0.00007816807,0.13502494,0.0020560105,0.0018753852,0.0075594,0.776516,0.0014514648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006270972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007369598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9375683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013598206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045214302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W86757145","doi":"10.21991/c9p94s","title":"LIVING TREE OR WIRED BONSAI? THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT'S CONSTITUTIONAL PROPOSALS ON THE ECONOMIC UNION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Tree (set theory); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.03361941563226558,"score_gpt":0.2190557494544575,"score_spread":0.1854363338221919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W86757145","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008962783,0.00008237451,0.017145487,0.024742745,0.004274871,0.002016888,0.00021033324,0.00033149193,0.942233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96275055,0.000014774363,0.00024584582,0.034162953,0.0008707343,0.00035676023,0.00009428346,0.000017676635,0.0014864099],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99693364,0.00007852789,0.0007835738,0.00060719636,0.00089507503,0.00070196146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998319,0.0004059333,0.00046263504,0.00049189973,0.00025868413,0.000061849],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087880116,0.00050917116,0.00030876175,0.00016620904,0.0033628826,0.00061891956,0.00083832693,0.00016007753,0.004469279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048557323,0.00030343235,0.00030537904,0.00029486086,0.00807316,0.0020501416,0.00035316037,0.00036531233,0.002111663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019547646,0.00018387486,0.0060443264,0.00001264281,0.00014298072,0.00001706486,0.00002379941,0.00025352516,0.00008541882,0.95866513,0.03415587,0.00021987608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002023589,0.00011681012,0.0036304942,0.0004470351,0.00015961131,0.00030238976,0.0021650295,0.012165962,0.00056264136,0.07706631,0.9001866,0.0011735508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002407106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008113971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9537878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006086435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011776121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W88989832","doi":"10.21991/c9cd41","title":"COMMITMENT AND COMMUNITY IN THE INTER-REFERENDUM PERIOD","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Period (music); Political science; Law; Politics; Art","score_opus":0.09384170883466772,"score_gpt":0.2406480322603349,"score_spread":0.14680632342566718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W88989832","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43366414,0.0026406734,0.046122186,0.0036263245,0.0024917996,0.0012168194,0.00071096525,0.00015771549,0.5093694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984725,0.000022645556,0.000270852,0.0008526134,0.000042272164,0.00009769229,0.000043766144,0.0000071271065,0.00019054084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824077,0.00021842889,0.00071593124,0.00031066305,0.00006487757,0.00044930755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998983,0.00016593549,0.00023085983,0.0004852334,0.000044523462,0.00009044701],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016398851,0.00024045359,0.00037188557,0.00023712536,0.0011342091,0.000088832756,0.0004930246,0.00013801921,0.0002658255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002824837,0.00021226864,0.00011480537,0.00022648355,0.002778434,0.00037134305,0.00017556529,0.00064395444,0.00032746274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029642222,0.00023205661,0.118220106,0.000018202245,0.000033804128,0.000008930534,0.0015485781,0.000008165235,0.000004669474,0.87919796,0.00053771195,0.00016020462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034182146,0.00037477206,0.054165855,0.0003184891,0.000033095122,0.0009891884,0.030587278,0.0005750089,0.00006871919,0.75494516,0.15349667,0.0010275743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007523887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00050254236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56480837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011360155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000085866915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W89025490","doi":"10.21991/c9zm2m","title":"Drivers Needed: Tough Choices from Alberta v. Wilson Colony of Hutterian Brethren","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.031467329142535354,"score_gpt":0.26442471498762216,"score_spread":0.2329573858450868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W89025490","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.115417145,0.0011763078,0.010789841,0.005332563,0.0052988166,0.0011600781,0.0006545429,0.00024965112,0.85992104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968251,0.00009218171,0.0007543495,0.00079143135,0.0004159149,0.00005012035,0.00008644294,0.000011253273,0.00097321835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971697,0.00013228804,0.00071529,0.0005346743,0.0006884081,0.00075964653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817485,0.0002839343,0.00043447496,0.00031854832,0.000453952,0.0003342228],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037010675,0.0003170111,0.0005118258,0.00018578461,0.0017250828,0.000100518984,0.0006478812,0.00036097813,0.0016720869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006296615,0.00031830184,0.00024017708,0.00052297604,0.008630218,0.0013232348,0.00015389638,0.0002321332,0.00023483581],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008748194,0.00013236189,0.048844613,0.000019234589,0.00012111551,0.000011385788,0.002866515,0.000017292014,0.00029933482,0.9427836,0.004294891,0.0005221814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023491504,0.0001880741,0.004175564,0.0006001938,0.00021781953,0.000026807422,0.0314177,0.000058248996,0.0029696452,0.07412757,0.8827519,0.0011173359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20901993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056154754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8814079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000219025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022987367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W89745944","doi":"10.21991/c9b36c","title":"LIVING IN A MATERIAL WORLD: PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THE CHARTER","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Property (philosophy); Property rights; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0383075225704225,"score_gpt":0.2795285920486006,"score_spread":0.2412210694781781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W89745944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054490373,0.000064201944,0.00096505956,0.0049311304,0.00272823,0.0009898279,0.00010256183,0.000103280545,0.9356253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957723,0.000010215985,0.00023070863,0.0015560853,0.00023501985,0.00018105068,0.000029218685,0.0000044886315,0.0019808856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975872,0.0002571625,0.00049268245,0.00035867863,0.0005872077,0.0007170729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930245,0.00015124395,0.00009728885,0.00020703427,0.00014568507,0.00009627526],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010456181,0.0002120636,0.00020962302,0.0004000244,0.0010764276,0.0001302681,0.0005851952,0.00012518754,0.0018271622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015591516,0.00013903588,0.00010474429,0.0006223021,0.003503918,0.0008702479,0.00008845248,0.00025760516,0.00022660338],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052731986,0.00022723472,0.05160672,0.000003940251,0.000012743061,0.00005181709,0.0022001842,0.000012910878,0.00001946846,0.94441825,0.0012972659,0.00009671824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010431939,0.00005579445,0.021113131,0.00043377976,0.000022386394,0.00006419586,0.004310069,0.000099771525,0.00011611668,0.084873125,0.88725585,0.0006125562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012840542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.100963265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.941282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031247808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077966583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W89911378","doi":"10.21991/c9rq2s","title":"ADLER V. ONTARIO: THE TROUBLING LEGACY OF A COMPROMISE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05131915634685788,"score_gpt":0.20915884503321752,"score_spread":0.15783968868635964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W89911378","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4385773,0.00035959244,0.03170107,0.0021310395,0.0037240288,0.0013715724,0.00004961313,0.00035168513,0.5217341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967357,0.0000025954182,0.00063716137,0.0013837898,0.0003259668,0.000034402477,0.00007786045,0.000012348008,0.0007901588],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796444,0.000013050725,0.0006530991,0.00041029253,0.00041576545,0.00054333935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985691,0.00005298662,0.0004251763,0.00046480852,0.0004483312,0.000039629253],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029388198,0.0003308519,0.00036112237,0.0002731372,0.0012776077,0.00021793162,0.0005790951,0.00010345401,0.0024943089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041355433,0.0002388581,0.00027865192,0.00035950585,0.003982869,0.0023096714,0.0002808408,0.00030586633,0.0004922716],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012701558,0.00017689301,0.032654516,0.00003279167,0.00007567713,0.000022380345,0.00006701747,0.00010591377,0.00006732498,0.9633995,0.0030739272,0.00019702992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029691553,0.00004065576,0.011867138,0.00025620716,0.00026895825,0.00013694682,0.001123514,0.0012458948,0.0002867269,0.5341322,0.44685438,0.0008182462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008909575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025757171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5581584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011190805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006692593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99872774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W91551210","doi":"10.21991/c95w9w","title":"VRIEND, RIGHTS AND DEMOCRACY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Human rights; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.036506925187303994,"score_gpt":0.20697124311460052,"score_spread":0.17046431792729652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W91551210","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008736461,0.00066095387,0.015248424,0.0016689552,0.0024959175,0.00034998797,0.00039257712,0.0002975854,0.97014916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99128413,0.000009866117,0.0005424798,0.0012624199,0.0002508677,0.000034172874,0.00006944977,0.000008554855,0.006538034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981941,0.00003699312,0.00046839847,0.00043079478,0.0002665107,0.0006031884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900335,0.00008548898,0.00009854219,0.00024300686,0.00020991312,0.00035967262],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010513309,0.0003017085,0.0002950593,0.00015890514,0.0020189397,0.00010134041,0.0002219714,0.00011187638,0.0023141527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007383906,0.00025397597,0.00014846453,0.00006855253,0.0092189815,0.0008410674,0.00012138735,0.00024162649,0.0005717734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041618798,0.00012954207,0.0019959821,0.000012823449,0.000048702816,0.000041663076,0.00076702447,0.0000012193024,0.0000057613065,0.991681,0.0048275394,0.00044711755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050247775,0.0000658817,0.00012534356,0.000036453417,0.00003772497,0.00009903609,0.00065713195,0.00018839946,0.00001940168,0.41069087,0.58723974,0.0003375089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000628146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00053801644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9825477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010153079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029273762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W93254731","doi":"10.21991/c9jq1j","title":"KEEPING RELIGIOUS FUNDAMENTALISM UNDER WRAPS: THE CLOTHING CONTROVERSY IN SELECTED EUROPEAN COUNTRIES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Clothing; Multiculturalism; Islam; Fundamentalism; Government (linguistics); Law; Human rights; Political science; Secularism; Terrorism; Sociology; History; Politics","score_opus":0.030083252814586223,"score_gpt":0.2688753680402263,"score_spread":0.2387921152256401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W93254731","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017771725,0.0038665703,0.06466682,0.016372796,0.0036687213,0.0016026923,0.00011123725,0.0005332657,0.8914062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99404025,0.0007598024,0.00028999514,0.004288623,0.00020280798,0.000055950757,0.00005727333,0.000014708081,0.00029061176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99688196,0.00040378346,0.0006305574,0.00048379527,0.0007045471,0.00089537736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851185,0.0002809501,0.00024381281,0.0003152101,0.00041829987,0.00022987896],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012715514,0.00029554334,0.00027047217,0.0002732996,0.0028181842,0.0002370963,0.00055787724,0.00015175191,0.00016595348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00072294334,0.0002594162,0.0001572345,0.0006585259,0.008358517,0.0008504352,0.00012923128,0.00034804016,0.00027423137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000854124,0.000077025186,0.018882815,0.000008625437,0.00004007897,0.000042071093,0.00380517,0.00029910283,0.000043018885,0.9702482,0.0062724412,0.00019599732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006185491,0.00013859109,0.0250171,0.00080655544,0.00023543976,0.00017537974,0.0770964,0.00061284093,0.00023095206,0.5115291,0.3761784,0.0017937346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00761964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009110857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97626853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005774872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019559793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W93866816","doi":"10.21991/c9q943","title":"THE MARKET AND THE CONSTITUTION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02203479412974821,"score_gpt":0.2583368456388308,"score_spread":0.2363020515090826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W93866816","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040884715,0.003168308,0.033405956,0.019969942,0.0024860322,0.0010050507,0.00013110018,0.00021012232,0.93921465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902885,0.0012371531,0.00079201825,0.0028640507,0.00032072893,0.00017527043,0.000016773378,0.0000074668237,0.004298039],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965571,0.00052057696,0.0006420833,0.00046115386,0.0007458579,0.0010732181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968701,0.0015219523,0.00027339035,0.0004660474,0.00048789562,0.00038063474],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019988853,0.00034511808,0.0003412396,0.00010645993,0.012217897,0.00027707292,0.00069818,0.00020767846,0.0005476481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001844292,0.00021970188,0.00024921907,0.00042893997,0.11414013,0.0006539358,0.00022981287,0.00043732306,0.00014551122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002508683,0.00004120617,0.0037577818,0.000004286345,0.00009740144,0.000013082718,0.0003648942,0.0000067683923,0.000002673962,0.98225904,0.011882075,0.0013199238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014797616,0.000022386144,0.00035530693,0.000042289397,0.000090278,0.00019503364,0.0066739395,0.00006961326,0.00001560097,0.095240094,0.8954867,0.00032895993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024607396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018275304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98987967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023412854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059631565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W93971668","doi":"10.21991/c95376","title":"THE BURDEN OF PROOF, THE CHARTER, AND A HIERARCHY OF LEGAL NORMS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Burden of proof; Charter; Hierarchy; Law and economics; Mathematics; Law; Political science; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.022903121811051124,"score_gpt":0.25670988416969515,"score_spread":0.23380676235864403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W93971668","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061413664,0.011780167,0.009522602,0.06342435,0.0040278616,0.0031004108,0.0005180719,0.00018404088,0.8460288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99765915,0.0004533352,0.00026884637,0.00023094799,0.00017138597,0.00005477349,0.00000796051,0.0000037317711,0.0011499005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983097,0.000111315785,0.00041462897,0.00021874609,0.0005016601,0.0004439772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987967,0.00021734428,0.00023514632,0.00026224746,0.0003769243,0.000111659945],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075327995,0.00015854753,0.00021044935,0.000017760509,0.0030056706,0.000053500215,0.0005069295,0.00015759018,0.00010418001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002851602,0.00009104961,0.00018452169,0.00029551153,0.026335143,0.0004219377,0.00013589878,0.00023148922,0.000009550829],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042521086,0.000046896203,0.0015876755,0.000013289353,0.000077393255,0.0000018513645,0.0062968307,0.000013255586,0.00011619311,0.9876358,0.003165438,0.0010028401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008443215,0.000091138645,0.00041367215,0.00013539843,0.0000863068,0.00006497637,0.06136136,0.0000936831,0.0011128482,0.12706223,0.80845106,0.00028302523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010484209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006587097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93624544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052296502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011660985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99829227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W95009408","doi":"10.21991/c9gm3n","title":"Guiding the Governor General’s Prerogatives: Constitutional Convention Versus an Apolitical Decision Rule","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Governor; Rule of law; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Physics; Sociology; Politics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.10650583399817165,"score_gpt":0.2607975038834354,"score_spread":0.15429166988526377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W95009408","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031019166,0.004858882,0.3290075,0.004778684,0.0095634945,0.0013764258,0.0028073194,0.0004453184,0.6161432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924417,0.0001552567,0.004410274,0.001141732,0.00048540914,0.00025892,0.00028207153,0.000019005973,0.0008056405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99574906,0.000079952755,0.0014799049,0.001143574,0.00040440075,0.0011431214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975398,0.00034195188,0.00052231905,0.00069326354,0.00047182362,0.000430848],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081844354,0.0006320565,0.0006997421,0.00031032518,0.003143176,0.00022701327,0.0008502889,0.00032308584,0.0017405368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010318757,0.0005436424,0.00047858388,0.00058115274,0.016292213,0.0019065137,0.00039918022,0.00041265265,0.002249997],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032927643,0.00036937607,0.022352992,0.000013040928,0.00030868,0.000025916801,0.00012559483,0.00017937325,0.000035229186,0.9727232,0.0031363792,0.00040096822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005026134,0.00029842267,0.006699379,0.00015140818,0.00012470597,0.00034175196,0.0014363426,0.0019727806,0.0003519367,0.59704673,0.38525277,0.0012976336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004935761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015555664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9614225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065321056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009941404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W95515725","doi":"10.21991/c9sh4s","title":"THE QUEBEC SECESSION REFERENCE: THE CONSTITUTIONAL OBLIGATION TO NEGOTIATE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Obligation; Negotiation; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.04053616749368175,"score_gpt":0.29690324870837265,"score_spread":0.2563670812146909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W95515725","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016020898,0.0005502953,0.1418658,0.055732567,0.007826313,0.0021695534,0.00034293483,0.0004430187,0.7750486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912361,0.00011614427,0.0005146815,0.0027337107,0.000454171,0.00022417495,0.0001434246,0.000008280455,0.0045693256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963639,0.00030553367,0.0006987136,0.00051089417,0.0012463194,0.00087464077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974059,0.0005065245,0.00030228254,0.00041025944,0.0010541732,0.0003208476],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001378536,0.00031896285,0.00021639366,0.00017148604,0.010070749,0.0003900287,0.000976678,0.00024453012,0.00063797785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011092887,0.00021328314,0.00019818831,0.0006425501,0.014432174,0.0010775204,0.00020583527,0.00042297525,0.0010858643],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012765499,0.00006746823,0.004295588,0.000002941913,0.00005215903,0.0000055305186,0.0006990297,0.00018397435,0.0000880371,0.98287416,0.00991281,0.0016906431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007459733,0.000040338244,0.0034974802,0.000113119866,0.00004368695,0.000039308034,0.005248713,0.00013171615,0.0003856987,0.106189646,0.88314945,0.0004148659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009668587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04040901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9752152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064509036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040424583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W98224180","doi":"10.21991/c93d35","title":"SOLUTIONS TO THE FUTURE OF CANADA AND QUÉBEC AFTER THE OCTOBER 26TH REFERENDUM: GENUINE SOVEREIGNTIES WITHIN A NOVEL UNION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Political science; Political economy; Economic history; Sociology; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.024878795404882487,"score_gpt":0.22740820719699187,"score_spread":0.20252941179210937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W98224180","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23129217,0.015945565,0.08293452,0.2779361,0.014280363,0.004366011,0.0061542466,0.00026820457,0.3668228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995861,0.00003746802,0.00022788087,0.001881577,0.00032518513,0.00009423763,0.000006894999,0.0000055537453,0.0015602197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979113,0.00011598095,0.00042882317,0.00028561306,0.0005872402,0.0006710652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880844,0.00014366391,0.00017631591,0.0003160809,0.00029627018,0.0002591958],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065624213,0.00020468673,0.0002270807,0.000046733854,0.0022141363,0.000050711435,0.00038880997,0.00012177894,0.00019357634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003376465,0.00012792052,0.00009008101,0.00029833108,0.0048624887,0.00027917302,0.00018322845,0.00022804648,0.000013650028],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004478424,0.000037342164,0.008688301,0.000008161498,0.000043358083,0.0000029130108,0.0010847037,0.00004320996,0.000015780233,0.97896695,0.010890283,0.00017423042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040487564,0.000034972167,0.02440544,0.00011983897,0.00005196453,0.00006362523,0.0073920083,0.000045771652,0.00004175626,0.012423702,0.9547125,0.00030354602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8701183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9897601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96654326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036806002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006841102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99908483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W98459277","doi":"10.21991/c9kq1v","title":"LE DOSSIER CONSTITUTIONNEL : PERSPECTIVES DE CHANGEMENT*","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Healthcare Systems and Practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.11440887451937594,"score_gpt":0.38578084748549146,"score_spread":0.27137197296611554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W98459277","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026865003,0.062375754,0.17003426,0.08565888,0.020425817,0.0038250256,0.0022998468,0.00060687086,0.65208703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96878654,0.0026460586,0.008386038,0.0051007182,0.0021607887,0.00070332823,0.00018696918,0.00006838246,0.011961191],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98860925,0.0026875667,0.0023519355,0.0016568173,0.0010009122,0.0036935108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992897,0.0012273951,0.0012821337,0.0011829912,0.0017625067,0.0016479702],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037885793,0.0011388047,0.0012310875,0.0007604466,0.008212494,0.00017301699,0.0009261869,0.0019269966,0.013745707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029161968,0.0012548005,0.00067871634,0.0012948678,0.018445779,0.0031051931,0.0006157374,0.002797208,0.0048161196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030749137,0.0011590939,0.016602885,0.0007205002,0.0005346518,0.00031437617,0.012169766,0.00004316931,0.000050681072,0.89821845,0.06565547,0.004223439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037918699,0.00023019814,0.003086729,0.0026447508,0.00031030484,0.0013696171,0.11777513,0.00033259348,0.000082974126,0.029729396,0.839297,0.0013494728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00904281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034425936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96610004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019795953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02927807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}