{"meta":{"query_hash":"56bec3dab4b4","filters":{"venue":"Constitutional Political Economy"},"cohort_total":10,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":10,"exported":10,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/56bec3dab4b4","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Constitutional+Political+Economy"},"results":[{"id":"W1598122255","doi":"10.1023/a:1012529023870","title":"Electoral Balancing in Federal and Sub-national Elections: The Case of Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Political Economy","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Political science; Balance (ability); Public administration; Federalism; Economics; Public economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.030765989425426025,"score_gpt":0.31490284066784013,"score_spread":0.2841368512424141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1598122255","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78036416,0.000078747165,0.00019853363,0.017302096,0.00015628226,0.00020750043,0.000019941288,0.000012113786,0.20166063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985908,7.637017e-7,0.000011334859,0.0010217116,0.0002518046,0.000021754478,0.0000033124127,0.0000018426424,0.000096654476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989903,0.0001194358,0.00025176848,0.00011695864,0.00011200389,0.0004095533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991597,0.00044067614,0.000035576733,0.000041880197,0.0001417444,0.00018044376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003815864,0.0000628502,0.00011117635,0.000039279763,0.00041990253,0.000037322847,0.00004917494,0.00004779131,0.0000785854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042152402,0.000054576907,0.000022831098,0.00013844026,0.0009177396,0.0001371618,0.00001145735,0.00010717901,0.0000025223135],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004501481,0.000013896863,0.06066415,0.0000040030527,0.000005378541,0.000025564952,0.000024604327,0.000018925322,0.000008744838,0.9387601,0.00043516964,0.000034929493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007967626,0.0000627197,0.09220205,0.000059735507,0.000017194205,0.0010760786,0.0010162871,0.0023268096,0.0002953714,0.8150815,0.08660514,0.00046036617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.63450307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.885505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25100195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005434084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028379515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50344044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979001178","doi":"10.1023/b:cope.0000003859.10184.f3","title":"The Core, Transaction Costs, and the Coase Theorem","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Political Economy","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Coase theorem; Externality; Transaction cost; Core (optical fiber); Economics; Pareto efficiency; Microeconomics; Pareto principle; Negotiation; Excludability; Public good; Mathematical economics; Law; Political science; Computer science; Operations management","score_opus":0.024761813864985802,"score_gpt":0.21848836027172536,"score_spread":0.19372654640673956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979001178","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036420827,0.0023778672,0.009137141,0.006521785,0.0010447204,0.00044291455,0.00014876078,0.00003035865,0.97665435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99617684,0.00011247912,0.000035307752,0.002949835,0.00026281693,0.00007559934,0.000008499426,0.000009704671,0.00036894108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984372,0.00005588129,0.00068930065,0.0003308895,0.000024622921,0.00046210748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854743,0.0007590814,0.00017481307,0.00027482986,0.000038795086,0.00020502089],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013062446,0.00014194609,0.00035817473,0.000047167057,0.0007539581,0.00020670923,0.00018365135,0.0001020462,0.000222376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030866833,0.00012057961,0.000149504,0.000057879322,0.005936181,0.00020468379,0.000019982414,0.00018408013,0.00045106735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032706033,0.000019392593,0.002105012,0.00000573286,0.00005696642,9.309989e-7,0.000022700795,0.0000060920142,2.220863e-7,0.99705595,0.0005776439,0.00011667768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092278124,0.000010940326,0.00020795004,0.0000045868687,0.000007868713,0.00004050823,0.000116759235,0.00042379368,0.000011299922,0.70329314,0.2948301,0.00013027526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022798969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000040183484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99253476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002387164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001325595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113529582","doi":"10.1023/a:1023639521374","title":"Constitutional Design for a Rent Seeking Society: The Voting Rule Choice Revisited","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Political Economy","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Anticipation (artificial intelligence); Constitution; Constitutional law; Constitutional economics; Economics; Constitutional amendment; Law and economics; Rent-seeking; Law; Political science; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.0678599396383057,"score_gpt":0.2569127034808392,"score_spread":0.18905276384253353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113529582","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023878255,0.002684785,0.5947558,0.008210364,0.0005531661,0.0006913916,0.00045459118,0.00007170423,0.39233935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98550206,0.000012578774,0.0058066375,0.0073865373,0.00054769684,0.00031432544,0.000052729523,0.000008587729,0.00036882542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977702,0.000041928542,0.00079357246,0.000577417,0.0000683752,0.0007484978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99810684,0.0010739184,0.00021862118,0.0002133519,0.000174879,0.00021238162],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094616046,0.00027540952,0.00044325067,0.00005442606,0.0013113363,0.00017431559,0.0002570771,0.00012815344,0.00036225954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011615378,0.00024894564,0.00041419332,0.00017433126,0.004389139,0.00033568486,0.000069997,0.00025599977,0.00042398667],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000864142,0.000066065695,0.00517811,0.000030373129,0.00017903252,0.0000013213261,0.000015632622,0.0003574926,0.0000038999524,0.99011064,0.0040199654,0.000028806997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057485554,0.00001869713,0.00033477083,0.000027114198,0.000022894907,0.000042951513,0.000038858543,0.00247948,0.000038518465,0.4058707,0.5902722,0.0002789536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027561704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000012682784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9852633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042586395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048177468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152256458","doi":"10.1007/s10602-012-9123-6","title":"Do departures from democratic accountability compromise the stability of public finances? Keynesianism, central banking, and minority governments in the Canadian system of party government, 1867–2009","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Political Economy","topic":"Fiscal Policies and Political Economy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Economics; Debt; Government (linguistics); Politics; Corporate governance; Political economy; Democracy; Operationalization; Public administration; Economic policy; Political science; Macroeconomics; Finance; Law","score_opus":0.040843458348512295,"score_gpt":0.23059197667573242,"score_spread":0.18974851832722012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152256458","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72640043,0.0009115674,0.00021627931,0.0032704389,0.00024830867,0.0005164629,0.0041789813,0.0000072600237,0.26425028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983307,0.000005451827,0.00007653372,0.001315374,0.00017949592,0.000052551248,0.000027097636,0.0000056541267,0.0000071016498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99741817,0.00012580244,0.001040298,0.00034281705,0.000111444555,0.0009614997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980216,0.0007239984,0.0003088478,0.00047280462,0.000034317534,0.00043840645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011750946,0.00022138302,0.00055276905,0.000041786836,0.00023034496,0.00009666067,0.0004188661,0.00015639597,0.00033730603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002764158,0.00017493052,0.00015136407,0.000104998806,0.0023531688,0.0004037053,0.00009353947,0.00026183657,0.000022315646],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062629665,0.0000886812,0.40863916,0.00005309159,0.000023444714,3.3603555e-7,0.000075943884,0.0000015322704,3.9369345e-7,0.5909536,0.00013129834,0.000026229687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053573627,0.000034882873,0.7786812,0.000026059564,0.000026326405,0.000009608533,0.0007824144,0.00070716615,0.00006125374,0.19746886,0.021413643,0.00025284395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056055307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011619443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39348474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010480195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028717847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9502305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2567201630","doi":"10.1007/s10602-017-9237-y","title":"Fixed versus flexible election terms: explaining innovation in the timing of Canada’s election cycle","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Political Economy","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Federal election; Constitutional law; Election law; Economics; Law and economics; Democracy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.08991814491701497,"score_gpt":0.3688257772041595,"score_spread":0.27890763228714455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2567201630","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20603725,0.0000071140244,0.0008653089,0.015791243,0.00064408,0.00025747705,0.000011218667,0.000019951369,0.77636635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99894077,2.515014e-7,0.000029158791,0.00044834331,0.00041647605,0.000034015575,0.000012788949,0.0000024952408,0.00011572959],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876463,0.00011640873,0.00036062696,0.00013915039,0.0001847512,0.00043442383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916947,0.00031745943,0.00015036974,0.0001463488,0.00013766576,0.00007867462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007259824,0.00007369404,0.00012545208,0.00007382355,0.0010394579,0.0001017113,0.00017758436,0.00007403151,0.000078579294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013066742,0.00006705496,0.000028105429,0.00013195466,0.00075495755,0.0003803813,0.000015289334,0.00013507719,0.0000075586936],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020376865,0.00001888818,0.006654008,0.0000072137773,0.000006537015,9.0078703e-7,0.00012948555,0.000022747903,0.00004395121,0.9923964,0.0005046977,0.00019478145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029335665,0.00028589572,0.15653872,0.00022594802,0.00006783565,0.000014091499,0.0032689923,0.0031381852,0.0064255884,0.5848612,0.24138556,0.00085435837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37855124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34269607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7929035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005820518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019152894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7994774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3032398211","doi":"10.1007/s10602-021-09358-2","title":"On the Structure of the Political Party System in Indian States, 1957 - 2018","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Constitutional Political Economy","topic":"Fiscal Policies and Political Economy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Legislature; CONTEST; State (computer science); Political economy; Openness to experience; Multi-party system; Political science; Per capita; Economics; Turnout; Political system; Primary election; Unanimity; Voting; General election; Law; Democracy; Sociology","score_opus":0.022680234613697916,"score_gpt":0.22240095937449975,"score_spread":0.19972072476080183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3032398211","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21282762,0.00075622206,0.0005162195,0.0710554,0.0033678908,0.0014996522,0.013961834,0.000063527485,0.69595164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98457724,0.0000038795188,0.00005699816,0.014502223,0.00047216564,0.000053456293,0.00019132682,0.000027100836,0.00011562179],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957993,0.00013593487,0.0017442607,0.00083880976,0.00009904314,0.0013826397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968291,0.00093130127,0.0004407704,0.0011991131,0.000086189524,0.0005135364],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003433918,0.00050512835,0.0011335079,0.00022335703,0.00020922505,0.00021153437,0.0009870926,0.00062797393,0.0011604183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000533271,0.00038733316,0.0005971195,0.00018794253,0.0036092007,0.00012335218,0.0008318843,0.0015307312,0.00021451818],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010372463,0.00009450134,0.0028526634,0.0002935293,0.000106199004,0.0000092703485,0.00004508624,0.00054228335,5.892109e-7,0.9941588,0.0018813183,0.0000053667663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003559287,0.000034098943,0.00300219,0.0003336678,0.000020721209,0.00003374559,0.00056769734,0.0010421724,0.00018138859,0.9756229,0.018330991,0.00047453158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025141342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016071636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7717496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013368943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009847519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281776454","doi":"10.1007/s10602-022-09364-y","title":"How cooperative is “cooperative federalism”? The political limits to intergovernmental cooperation under a de facto concurrency rule","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Political Economy","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences","keywords":"Federalism; Law and economics; Legislature; Status quo; Cooperative federalism; Rule of law; Political science; Politics; De facto; Jurisprudence; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.036271006274218864,"score_gpt":0.30781088361175135,"score_spread":0.2715398773375325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281776454","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040606912,0.00010545034,0.015803806,0.44254708,0.0009152098,0.0011535834,0.0019798859,0.00008779725,0.49680027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9225037,0.000001056875,0.000046358262,0.07196776,0.0006548684,0.00031849148,0.000028477094,0.000009818854,0.004469457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99690145,0.00054381054,0.00035324958,0.00045902113,0.00047656914,0.001265918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980393,0.00056630274,0.00006480966,0.00019018918,0.00021430878,0.0009250847],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003973609,0.0002382488,0.0002918488,0.0000409565,0.0025475202,0.0005734139,0.00043464065,0.0000943948,0.0013700736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006242247,0.0002027052,0.00013616934,0.00019167284,0.002481953,0.00044381776,0.00021627382,0.00043644727,0.00014388456],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017868153,0.00010305291,0.00042505894,0.0000039692727,0.000044008408,0.000008412961,0.00083799014,0.000046438236,0.000054947788,0.9884489,0.009968819,0.000040517032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005996944,0.00018361045,0.00053882215,0.000022887953,0.000028269194,0.000063460335,0.01871867,0.00033691144,0.0008962908,0.06933699,0.90878075,0.00049362675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032854644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035513955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9191119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029963716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002833089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99954283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387705371","doi":"10.1007/s10602-023-09419-8","title":"The pure logic of discrimination","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Political Economy","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Pareto principle; Outcome (game theory); Economics; Mathematical economics; Simple (philosophy); Statistical discrimination; Microeconomics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05887008585413539,"score_gpt":0.26297041914713787,"score_spread":0.20410033329300248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387705371","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01917546,0.00030096187,0.0045769233,0.01067803,0.0007396839,0.0001913072,0.00018880199,0.00007835565,0.9640705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99841225,0.0000044700223,0.000024750896,0.0003258323,0.00014487075,0.000023835235,0.00002529016,0.00000394401,0.0010347534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904436,0.00001995606,0.00045419933,0.00016940925,0.000020359637,0.00029169375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992387,0.00035026149,0.00012795498,0.00017027081,0.000036282505,0.00007652425],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070003484,0.00007458728,0.00017715307,0.00008826511,0.0001893836,0.000037103167,0.00017161827,0.000056236127,0.000107866705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036035368,0.00006433768,0.00009170702,0.00012976374,0.0010323419,0.00010597473,0.000042826163,0.00008002149,0.0015869053],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033894712,0.000012892916,0.0028883207,0.000019266372,0.000016962704,8.900619e-7,0.00001676558,0.000027316302,0.0000030297663,0.9962303,0.00073167164,0.00004920798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011325901,0.000013951058,0.0028675261,0.000009695685,0.0000024158392,0.000005965302,0.000110525834,0.0006755195,0.00004739579,0.92218745,0.07388997,0.00007635293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010602428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000013743327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9792368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005689259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049497423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99919045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407553664","doi":"10.1007/s10602-025-09463-6","title":"Political representation in an era of income inequality and post-truth politics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Political Economy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Inequality; Representation (politics); Economic inequality; Political science; Constitutional law; Political economy; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.041702453299323886,"score_gpt":0.392714494065901,"score_spread":0.3510120407665771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407553664","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47596306,0.000050012495,0.00013999187,0.026788224,0.00023169574,0.000206239,0.00009081789,0.000030857536,0.4964991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99676853,0.0000045925167,0.00010538574,0.002718793,0.0003101137,0.000015834254,0.00001422397,0.0000023074315,0.00006023111],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846476,0.00020869031,0.00042074916,0.00022208414,0.00012077757,0.0005629232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986101,0.00074605393,0.000046752943,0.000117898446,0.00020329453,0.0002758983],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003743488,0.000102816295,0.00027036614,0.00013104314,0.0003428181,0.00003766317,0.00011971273,0.00014642783,0.00001892257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014068219,0.000100889396,0.00005770397,0.00019383883,0.005668282,0.00031184565,0.000083499996,0.00019889015,0.0000038393464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009421359,0.00006694642,0.10238562,0.000026271771,0.000015969155,0.0000013949208,0.00032346035,5.938666e-7,0.0000034145191,0.89705956,0.000006919396,0.00010044437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028613696,0.000021417769,0.162251,0.00003310446,0.000012976628,9.920597e-7,0.0050903605,0.000019560099,0.00006105331,0.8317527,0.00037345887,0.000097233395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048313187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003823284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5208055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025481245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011431363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409177787","doi":"10.1007/s10602-025-09466-3","title":"Correction: Political representation in an era of income inequality and post-truth politics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Political Economy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Representation (politics); Inequality; Political science; Economic inequality; Positive economics; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.037296603366291314,"score_gpt":0.38252181460460377,"score_spread":0.34522521123831246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409177787","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.357698,0.000053059503,0.00025190128,0.025010116,0.0009535511,0.00023848673,0.00006819195,0.000043938682,0.6156828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99702746,0.000006019354,0.00006472817,0.0022751072,0.0004314472,0.000017401344,0.000014180323,0.0000023425573,0.00016129098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985038,0.00021293106,0.00041894725,0.0002270021,0.00012067901,0.0005166141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984542,0.0008891735,0.000050617084,0.000113459086,0.00023279894,0.00025972084],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003519059,0.000103765524,0.00026393807,0.00013415038,0.0004049832,0.00004032165,0.00010501463,0.00015105143,0.000026429818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016340619,0.00010376998,0.00005862464,0.0002246951,0.0050730905,0.00032352193,0.00007189449,0.00022679073,0.000004335518],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001138617,0.00006830631,0.10066531,0.000019307221,0.000015892678,0.0000012525425,0.0003559867,0.0000014604395,0.0000020907587,0.8986668,0.000030276893,0.00016195863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031451482,0.00003065299,0.20391653,0.00004812709,0.000016418293,0.0000022900779,0.007268557,0.00006211471,0.00007596903,0.78746,0.00068722584,0.00011757445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064031663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00059057074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6393295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030365662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011800235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99763453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}