{"meta":{"query_hash":"56bec3dab4b4","filters":{"venue":"Constitutional Political Economy"},"cohort_total":10,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":10,"exported":10,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/56bec3dab4b4","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Constitutional+Political+Economy"},"results":[{"id":"W1598122255","doi":"10.1023/a:1012529023870","title":"Electoral Balancing in Federal and Sub-national Elections: The Case of Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Political Economy","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Political science; Balance (ability); Public administration; Federalism; Economics; Public economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.030765989425426025,"score_gpt":0.31490284066784013,"score_spread":0.2841368512424141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1598122255","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8146273,0.0008367828,0.00073732034,0.011589847,0.00007279158,0.00009230811,0.0003087575,0.000027388422,0.1717075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873399,0.00014405891,0.00017170068,0.00026758964,0.00001425271,0.000014616412,0.000048003272,0.0000066031666,0.011993175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918554,0.0011526368,0.00010336762,0.00034168264,0.00087398326,0.0056729717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99410784,0.0019794009,0.0003213671,0.00021278048,0.001740927,0.0016375597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045791753,0.00025280568,0.0010778419,0.0016467151,0.01926867,0.01059166,0.0024542767,0.00430116,0.013214792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0145126,0.00029627528,0.0005942556,0.003950098,0.0049970467,0.0020461055,0.002615542,0.0037027206,0.00054046366],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067386177,0.00025006317,0.039961368,0.00010777065,0.00011567485,0.0012040809,0.016839737,0.0120368935,0.0005248784,0.85023755,0.031736944,0.046311073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010464176,0.0002969539,0.26517838,0.00029105518,0.00063222746,0.0005778919,0.14822531,0.053928155,0.0022099044,0.2521836,0.27502,0.00041020924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98112065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9926601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0769302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0769302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07618092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5581703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979001178","doi":"10.1023/b:cope.0000003859.10184.f3","title":"The Core, Transaction Costs, and the Coase Theorem","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Political Economy","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Coase theorem; Externality; Transaction cost; Core (optical fiber); Economics; Pareto efficiency; Microeconomics; Pareto principle; Negotiation; Excludability; Public good; Mathematical economics; Law; Political science; Computer science; Operations management","score_opus":0.024761813864985802,"score_gpt":0.21848836027172536,"score_spread":0.19372654640673956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979001178","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10382259,0.009611586,0.26103196,0.030430691,0.00038613053,0.00014977153,0.00071458204,0.00022992546,0.5936228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.950914,0.0027861663,0.009566612,0.0015183254,0.0006527992,0.00017397139,0.00014343658,0.000115624105,0.034129124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997535,0.0009200512,0.000096249605,0.00044311164,0.00059842726,0.00040728363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854897,0.010199666,0.0008831087,0.0018010625,0.0012125267,0.00041396276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036928493,0.00043475852,0.0013867313,0.0017294119,0.0019465005,0.0066097393,0.0014233332,0.0027743725,0.02231116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019128652,0.00047637915,0.00073245977,0.0020460717,0.007636596,0.012515526,0.002211999,0.0040972373,0.0017957516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000751072,0.0000056174904,0.000061144616,0.000010943198,0.0000026396656,0.000008221401,0.000022539243,0.00039445155,0.000019487941,0.99682164,0.0010019132,0.0016438953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056158647,0.0000024184671,0.0000710456,0.000009287304,0.0000023828713,0.0000130368335,0.000017012351,0.0010848074,0.00004185998,0.9966491,0.0021009576,0.0000025429238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026214286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015540371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02231116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033077914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024021878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07463825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113529582","doi":"10.1023/a:1023639521374","title":"Constitutional Design for a Rent Seeking Society: The Voting Rule Choice Revisited","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Political Economy","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Anticipation (artificial intelligence); Constitution; Constitutional law; Constitutional economics; Economics; Constitutional amendment; Law and economics; Rent-seeking; Law; Political science; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.0678599396383057,"score_gpt":0.2569127034808392,"score_spread":0.18905276384253353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113529582","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2593524,0.001698996,0.26529458,0.09798836,0.0007924749,0.00027323104,0.0004617053,0.00017072032,0.37396765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97585684,0.0003352878,0.011169345,0.0014197838,0.000412482,0.00010997412,0.00004870968,0.000060309372,0.0105872145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920596,0.004027293,0.00028937188,0.001115936,0.001351415,0.0011564458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98713315,0.006868001,0.0009490345,0.0022921397,0.0016486425,0.0011090905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011567419,0.00040456458,0.001669623,0.0013353551,0.004276726,0.009390939,0.002763707,0.0059289583,0.016680378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027909085,0.0005389939,0.0010209875,0.001557898,0.014301321,0.008940963,0.0019805385,0.0062548546,0.0010545001],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051040356,0.0000077673985,0.000063856234,0.000008958972,0.0000036384515,0.000008794946,0.000078525714,0.0002802938,0.000057217825,0.99759513,0.00058096903,0.0013098347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012099913,0.000006667992,0.0001327857,0.000008190959,0.000004703017,0.000013248307,0.00008827603,0.002127637,0.000078036195,0.99550796,0.0020145234,0.0000058865535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003086712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038806277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016680378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004439612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003967428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06117505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152256458","doi":"10.1007/s10602-012-9123-6","title":"Do departures from democratic accountability compromise the stability of public finances? Keynesianism, central banking, and minority governments in the Canadian system of party government, 1867–2009","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Political Economy","topic":"Fiscal Policies and Political Economy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Economics; Debt; Government (linguistics); Politics; Corporate governance; Political economy; Democracy; Operationalization; Public administration; Economic policy; Political science; Macroeconomics; Finance; Law","score_opus":0.040843458348512295,"score_gpt":0.23059197667573242,"score_spread":0.18974851832722012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152256458","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89719296,0.0022313204,0.00035999354,0.047912017,0.00010934877,0.000024381494,0.00082801474,0.000014408546,0.05132751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99651945,0.00035820252,0.00006192186,0.00040843379,0.000030345605,0.0000018874558,0.000053724663,0.000004494764,0.0025615403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968838,0.00016844028,0.00006697562,0.00023701727,0.0006111709,0.0020325354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99488467,0.00060464715,0.0010688802,0.00021173012,0.0023808717,0.0008491264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004101775,0.000183304,0.0004706947,0.0012457749,0.008028306,0.0065447288,0.0013890788,0.0018354345,0.003759471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013970897,0.0002397088,0.0004090027,0.002739983,0.00617459,0.0022834984,0.0012714148,0.004347882,0.00019316566],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059409125,0.000111171525,0.1378685,0.00006953049,0.00014129649,0.00032656,0.013684978,0.003976631,0.00095254596,0.78576183,0.020426132,0.03608674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015299981,0.00008337064,0.7715292,0.00017327812,0.0002947615,0.00012656834,0.017653292,0.0058384743,0.0025560635,0.06919452,0.13217491,0.00022256056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98846906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99535537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9032532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09674683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09561437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70195067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2567201630","doi":"10.1007/s10602-017-9237-y","title":"Fixed versus flexible election terms: explaining innovation in the timing of Canada’s election cycle","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Political Economy","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Federal election; Constitutional law; Election law; Economics; Law and economics; Democracy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.08991814491701497,"score_gpt":0.3688257772041595,"score_spread":0.27890763228714455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2567201630","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9316475,0.0010658874,0.0044104643,0.006450096,0.000100050725,0.00010490407,0.0013574967,0.000088894085,0.0547747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99594396,0.00012093748,0.0003321152,0.00008051349,0.000016867729,0.000007906665,0.00013026102,0.000013955088,0.003353565],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787927,0.0003982782,0.00006336714,0.00029742223,0.00045977836,0.00090184354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98245186,0.0091746645,0.0020870457,0.0010850637,0.0033493342,0.0018520821],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052249,0.00020529171,0.0007005015,0.0022019814,0.002987977,0.0055860854,0.0015798609,0.0014390992,0.010888971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036387697,0.00026025317,0.00047513636,0.0027133217,0.002841534,0.0013649677,0.0013662988,0.002105589,0.00048309282],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006870504,0.00024686908,0.42933965,0.0002545062,0.00020287269,0.00029885207,0.0057438235,0.053688183,0.0024395469,0.41224927,0.014482592,0.08036685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021819357,0.00014919366,0.73967534,0.000210967,0.0002654637,0.00008719602,0.005988173,0.091063365,0.0018325592,0.09976008,0.060584348,0.00016517604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9099897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.936496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9700852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02991477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028185863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21704781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3032398211","doi":"10.1007/s10602-021-09358-2","title":"On the Structure of the Political Party System in Indian States, 1957 - 2018","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Constitutional Political Economy","topic":"Fiscal Policies and Political Economy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Legislature; CONTEST; State (computer science); Political economy; Openness to experience; Multi-party system; Political science; Per capita; Economics; Turnout; Political system; Primary election; Unanimity; Voting; General election; Law; Democracy; Sociology","score_opus":0.022680234613697916,"score_gpt":0.22240095937449975,"score_spread":0.19972072476080183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3032398211","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9864889,0.00012191482,0.00047853796,0.00035325764,0.000008487305,0.0000139417425,0.0010878087,0.000017313969,0.011429966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986393,0.00003361693,0.00008020281,0.000009917766,0.0000047777216,0.0000032277715,0.00032887573,0.000002214992,0.00089792494],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926513,0.00019110003,0.000038960483,0.000103233586,0.00013178175,0.00026983215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985612,0.00045449886,0.00035908367,0.00014286072,0.00033580163,0.00014655643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082828075,0.0000811619,0.00021413567,0.001961543,0.000838626,0.0013604946,0.0005186539,0.00018693774,0.0034958974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030724443,0.00014963138,0.00036355975,0.002705366,0.0009480435,0.00039811022,0.0007176778,0.0006042819,0.00043502156],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027313188,0.00012534393,0.85699,0.0000728059,0.00013907666,0.00030107438,0.0037453182,0.020937162,0.00092800084,0.07981681,0.0038378052,0.032833446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009508288,0.00004765451,0.97619355,0.000019841424,0.000035942983,0.000080323225,0.002186435,0.009616136,0.00042491022,0.005483173,0.0058832904,0.00001929731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10402367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12812681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10402367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034533858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011002356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20683634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281776454","doi":"10.1007/s10602-022-09364-y","title":"How cooperative is “cooperative federalism”? The political limits to intergovernmental cooperation under a de facto concurrency rule","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Political Economy","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences","keywords":"Federalism; Law and economics; Legislature; Status quo; Cooperative federalism; Rule of law; Political science; Politics; De facto; Jurisprudence; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.036271006274218864,"score_gpt":0.30781088361175135,"score_spread":0.2715398773375325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281776454","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6014025,0.0007455807,0.037316963,0.028600225,0.000063095475,0.00008408434,0.00016935555,0.00006782319,0.33155042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99830854,0.00006826882,0.0005871176,0.00017799232,0.000011412183,0.00001286342,0.0000069196276,0.000003001225,0.00082378316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918493,0.0024788342,0.00025401992,0.0010725515,0.0021888334,0.002156502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9830497,0.008590448,0.0020719164,0.0022207694,0.0025444909,0.0015226908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008628391,0.00016079983,0.00055509724,0.0010787803,0.003612922,0.0065582385,0.001140351,0.0019432729,0.0040168944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024991138,0.00027019513,0.00061960856,0.00093005906,0.015266712,0.004128634,0.0033276095,0.0025003704,0.00015941758],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012393432,0.00000915132,0.0012133572,0.0000069823973,0.00000873027,0.000021340782,0.00031827574,0.0024865055,0.00018462296,0.99342597,0.0003318529,0.001980823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004054781,0.000020609192,0.0052508633,0.00003281201,0.000031532083,0.000034164612,0.0009835323,0.007797559,0.00034214774,0.97862417,0.006821854,0.0000200798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17689967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14172274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17689967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015068184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012846677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387705371","doi":"10.1007/s10602-023-09419-8","title":"The pure logic of discrimination","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Political Economy","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Pareto principle; Outcome (game theory); Economics; Mathematical economics; Simple (philosophy); Statistical discrimination; Microeconomics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05887008585413539,"score_gpt":0.26297041914713787,"score_spread":0.20410033329300248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387705371","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.063020684,0.0018856911,0.15424414,0.041747287,0.00078101706,0.00007098148,0.00032817625,0.00011976942,0.7378022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9382588,0.00038475866,0.006112234,0.0033290037,0.0005946049,0.000103064645,0.00006243615,0.000051704155,0.051103394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963013,0.0015580121,0.00010742811,0.00072332396,0.0007673548,0.00054246426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99592775,0.0024257018,0.00023284889,0.00075646397,0.00042204364,0.00023517074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028860343,0.00033463252,0.0008211843,0.0009357057,0.0032626542,0.0067952303,0.0012725324,0.0037333872,0.016323628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010253585,0.0004197577,0.0005800444,0.0010252661,0.011180704,0.0071724323,0.0021771,0.0048541916,0.0013054799],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011926568,0.0000022896138,0.0000149379475,0.0000016418342,8.8427754e-7,0.0000015652319,0.000016638282,0.00006729148,0.000007651593,0.9988686,0.00051778747,0.00049970055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022323493,7.9193677e-7,0.000018662447,0.000001713962,6.6930767e-7,0.0000029999435,0.0000091790125,0.00029333832,0.000012775739,0.99822205,0.0014345266,0.0000010535132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035563058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023982315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016323628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029323157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020055587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054607987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407553664","doi":"10.1007/s10602-025-09463-6","title":"Political representation in an era of income inequality and post-truth politics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Political Economy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Inequality; Representation (politics); Economic inequality; Political science; Constitutional law; Political economy; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.041702453299323886,"score_gpt":0.392714494065901,"score_spread":0.3510120407665771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407553664","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4277377,0.0029556837,0.00598952,0.13635348,0.0006663144,0.000033641554,0.00010864941,0.00003563705,0.4261194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926823,0.0001844267,0.00015983923,0.0011841581,0.00025603644,0.000011613595,0.000009766373,0.000009609974,0.0055023134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939049,0.0032538401,0.00009544515,0.0005318292,0.0007407249,0.0014732344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98994946,0.0068582282,0.0008671845,0.00074487895,0.0006276567,0.0009525848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008659306,0.0001869479,0.00039946666,0.0020171623,0.009491486,0.0118257245,0.0009989976,0.004491556,0.010739762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016221648,0.00024354357,0.00021294723,0.0024020588,0.031930957,0.011520942,0.005079415,0.005827491,0.00039801042],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011351875,0.00001603773,0.000313362,0.0000042044585,0.0000010345453,0.000013881987,0.0041324515,0.000040053645,0.000026590566,0.99257666,0.0008851134,0.0019791522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024498724,0.000028906827,0.005377169,0.000060602313,0.0000070879632,0.000053267162,0.012193161,0.0006479288,0.0002619175,0.92746896,0.05386096,0.00001554533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064284224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075710253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0118257245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007679452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040463493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05571854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409177787","doi":"10.1007/s10602-025-09466-3","title":"Correction: Political representation in an era of income inequality and post-truth politics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Political Economy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Representation (politics); Inequality; Political science; Economic inequality; Positive economics; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.037296603366291314,"score_gpt":0.38252181460460377,"score_spread":0.34522521123831246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409177787","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015027098,0.0006024808,0.000552848,0.1225653,0.87107897,0.000036801932,0.0021510026,0.0004637721,0.0023986043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.032868862,0.0052743433,0.0047448925,0.23504372,0.49099153,0.00087091257,0.0037183694,0.0025836348,0.22390383],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891773,0.0023617586,0.0019350263,0.0016453953,0.0034843832,0.0013960833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89392513,0.03667872,0.0046489295,0.01023651,0.050405163,0.004105425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007948135,0.0036650472,0.004858614,0.006705645,0.008129229,0.01053583,0.008022973,0.024330473,0.12377854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18085653,0.0025371101,0.0023449631,0.008795652,0.0077994843,0.006375615,0.0058408882,0.024314914,0.05945523],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027179189,0.0000023850341,0.000049052745,0.00012528745,0.000009988353,0.000075788106,0.00005654304,0.000025811807,0.000011846675,0.0009900081,0.9973416,0.0012844928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018885944,0.000017221473,0.0013917265,0.0009883356,0.00008460086,0.00035266383,0.0004985326,0.000708095,0.0002990447,0.0054018055,0.9899715,0.00009762717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042311013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0426469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12377854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009208352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012987204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41408044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}