{"meta":{"query_hash":"7612d2d51b70","filters":{"venue":"Constitutional commentary"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/7612d2d51b70","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Constitutional+commentary"},"results":[{"id":"W1922063759","doi":"10.24926/26390742.1599","title":"Proportionality and Pretense","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional commentary","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Judicial review; Law and economics; Political science; Scope (computer science); Human rights; Law; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.0482812790387966,"score_gpt":0.3224097474795693,"score_spread":0.2741284684407727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1922063759","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011815055,0.005637784,0.03751055,0.038508043,0.0012786955,0.00011496313,0.000085930646,0.000074682335,0.90497434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8992007,0.0029722543,0.012698641,0.0142782815,0.0017598543,0.0004237337,0.00008085148,0.00012953008,0.068456225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9836294,0.0073676785,0.00094043714,0.0032345,0.0034439461,0.0013840428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877983,0.007051131,0.0008897074,0.0021044717,0.0017476708,0.00040865346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015306844,0.00056684465,0.00071885344,0.0020199788,0.0070967106,0.010505362,0.0018794413,0.0051218164,0.0081651565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027623285,0.0004673568,0.0006768278,0.0012443471,0.07470968,0.016525418,0.0069055483,0.009430444,0.0014411336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016579982,0.0000014926973,0.00001830504,0.0000051135535,6.72871e-7,0.0000064773435,0.00034914684,0.000016983891,0.000011586471,0.9982266,0.0005066135,0.00085540005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000770124,0.000008802209,0.00007645547,0.0000516493,0.0000027421802,0.000032921183,0.00028061305,0.00010301621,0.00009864227,0.9597069,0.03962306,0.0000074920613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040061832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026582894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015306844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058002714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055803116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08095127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770237858","doi":"10.24926/26390742.1259","title":"Viewpoint Discrimination, Hate Speech Laws, and the Double-Sided Nature of Freedom of Speech","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional commentary","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Free speech; First amendment; Law; Political science; Supreme court","score_opus":0.021973279780244197,"score_gpt":0.25754783292264793,"score_spread":0.23557455314240375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770237858","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09119349,0.002258139,0.026090557,0.13721672,0.0014346831,0.000097585704,0.00027273304,0.000105741754,0.7413304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9481461,0.0006827022,0.0030715798,0.018540867,0.0002793533,0.000047762784,0.000049263428,0.000038985745,0.029143283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898487,0.0015328976,0.00023164247,0.0014667449,0.0048012314,0.0021188217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98705006,0.007390435,0.00096343254,0.0011762476,0.0026359363,0.00078384124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008163693,0.0005654958,0.00048113093,0.0015888173,0.012806472,0.0103558,0.0023615898,0.00807436,0.005560058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02021702,0.0003632859,0.00052264263,0.0015354413,0.06169906,0.0059637935,0.0033490593,0.012115249,0.00035651986],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009324428,0.0000062342674,0.0006357301,0.000021975324,0.0000032668108,0.000093588555,0.007924974,0.00007946577,0.00022361326,0.9789291,0.005371357,0.0067014727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000448657,0.000044816607,0.009436395,0.0004973776,0.00008147344,0.00042514308,0.026524909,0.0014641874,0.0033947057,0.68419087,0.27373406,0.00016128679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6940185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82538605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6940185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024330096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037630294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61556697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125212540","doi":"10.24926/26390742.1993","title":"Originalism and Its Discontents (Plus a Thought or Two About Abortion)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional commentary","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centennial College","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Constitutionalism; Constitution; Meaning (existential); Fidelity; Epistemology; Original meaning; Argument (complex analysis); Epiphenomenon; Thought experiment; Interpretation (philosophy); Soundness; Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Political science; Democracy; Politics; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07849300993930311,"score_gpt":0.3629534299588191,"score_spread":0.284460420019516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125212540","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03905886,0.01838157,0.011491314,0.43732223,0.0024871447,0.000042104726,0.00007946788,0.000042101838,0.49109513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93649006,0.0024630092,0.0020495914,0.02852201,0.0017407143,0.000061924526,0.000029576695,0.00005654016,0.028586619],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894477,0.007040458,0.00023389765,0.0010644534,0.0014885308,0.0007249353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99086285,0.0072335713,0.00038538154,0.0007362107,0.0005950803,0.00018688547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008950656,0.00027900923,0.0003238231,0.0008149508,0.007104524,0.006943549,0.0011755516,0.007179604,0.0032133502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014816168,0.00023294789,0.00046566717,0.0006475087,0.073138446,0.0064256266,0.0037244374,0.009218581,0.00032916776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054029188,0.0000026860137,0.00003653064,0.000010833134,9.901205e-7,0.000027679873,0.0025804539,0.000018518795,0.000024738265,0.99333364,0.0023850598,0.0015733914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020162437,0.000014221116,0.00032564817,0.00012606896,0.0000065516865,0.00007054133,0.0028393583,0.00016229141,0.00023527571,0.8902332,0.10595294,0.00001366806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005887691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00608788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008950656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005365115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004226469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0473361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}