{"meta":{"query_hash":"5544a72b66df","filters":{"venue":"Consumer Psychology Review"},"cohort_total":9,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":9,"exported":9,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/5544a72b66df","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Consumer+Psychology+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W2771374407","doi":"10.1002/arcp.1002","title":"Conceptual metaphors shape consumer psychology","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Consumer Psychology Review","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Cancer Institute","keywords":"Persuasion; Metaphor; Salient; Abstraction; Product (mathematics); Conceptual metaphor; Psychology; Consumption (sociology); Consumer behaviour; Epistemology; Social psychology; Advertising; Cognitive psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Linguistics; Business; Social science","score_opus":0.10464861002307009,"score_gpt":0.42216758654509295,"score_spread":0.3175189765220229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771374407","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21657427,0.4389531,0.011792689,0.034173276,0.00075446814,0.000053421158,0.0000625022,0.00009159644,0.29754472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9103587,0.07670983,0.0028366118,0.0035867556,0.00035577622,0.000037689813,0.00003833767,0.000037495785,0.0060387435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862885,0.00088895246,0.00003076182,0.00012289926,0.0002795541,0.000049091235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977748,0.0016414532,0.0001901166,0.0000831417,0.000245733,0.00006474711],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024477968,0.0003851907,0.00036133005,0.0012689916,0.00081594154,0.0047768294,0.0003983678,0.0014106956,0.004065791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003924413,0.0002517195,0.0002318548,0.0011951769,0.007188474,0.0034864945,0.0014549916,0.0021540022,0.00039421392],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016697893,0.00016617052,0.0063873157,0.002035287,0.00010014718,0.0010391611,0.11895921,0.0004298657,0.004224833,0.63041395,0.018345233,0.21773185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000736467,0.00016246177,0.028568838,0.0029145896,0.00011237536,0.0027930844,0.051193915,0.0008056424,0.0009506738,0.4693581,0.44299152,0.000075218515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013306685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001367949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047768294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001403306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007710985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013601422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901504362","doi":"10.1002/arcp.1044","title":"Creativity: Past, present, and future","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Consumer Psychology Review","topic":"Creativity in Education and Neuroscience","field":"Psychology","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"BC Innovation Council; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Creativity; Psychology; Construct (python library); Cognition; Personality; Creativity technique; Mysticism; Power (physics); Social psychology; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.08955799748436925,"score_gpt":0.45923279011813734,"score_spread":0.36967479263376807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901504362","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005068295,0.937073,0.0008192051,0.035722133,0.0011799381,0.000004008342,0.00001484382,0.00000900873,0.020109572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17103817,0.8160583,0.0015602966,0.004710064,0.0034097633,0.000020598773,0.00002453756,0.000008977817,0.0031693457],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990107,0.00039253454,0.000082545834,0.00015487046,0.00025124438,0.00010801703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99685067,0.0017526257,0.00030820922,0.00012743626,0.00044468747,0.00051636505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003100907,0.0002981301,0.00043766515,0.001529187,0.0010880895,0.007196639,0.00071036594,0.0020858382,0.0028501807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002291436,0.0001727118,0.00035208598,0.0022458152,0.005433173,0.0050475593,0.0020252466,0.003225267,0.00041095685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001038368,0.0000944231,0.0034667202,0.003643247,0.00005843912,0.00044126197,0.0059254346,0.00047656588,0.0006342917,0.2598886,0.029584978,0.6956822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024032546,0.00013518444,0.010425007,0.010349868,0.00003973062,0.0026013288,0.016912203,0.0005676056,0.000389448,0.2326571,0.72581923,0.00007920231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010966178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014644559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007196639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016911912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023946625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016399324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973910261","doi":"10.1002/arcp.1054","title":"The 3 C's of anthropomorphism: Connection, comprehension, and competition","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Consumer Psychology Review","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Comprehension; Connection (principal bundle); Psychology; Consumption (sociology); Dimension (graph theory); Social psychology; Advertising; Business; Aesthetics; Computer science; Engineering; Art; Mathematics","score_opus":0.037933057353279474,"score_gpt":0.31497438595528493,"score_spread":0.2770413286020055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2973910261","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5963957,0.14324407,0.009601605,0.019156575,0.00041926806,0.00020591752,0.00016469757,0.00007426638,0.23073788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9706233,0.02323597,0.0021054484,0.0009376821,0.00014477228,0.000075699834,0.000043585165,0.000011530343,0.0028219847],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985141,0.0008209166,0.00007314583,0.000105703526,0.00038736718,0.00009878074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952915,0.0027996718,0.0009915419,0.00015915133,0.0005093447,0.0002488569],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001844135,0.0002923183,0.000450216,0.001466425,0.0005096727,0.0038645142,0.00042471796,0.0012051683,0.004697955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004664213,0.00022083512,0.00043922116,0.0011602443,0.0062795985,0.0026503205,0.0020761865,0.0016217993,0.00014271299],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065552397,0.00029077524,0.041065622,0.0050673573,0.00031620628,0.000638047,0.048040234,0.0006497271,0.0048020603,0.39375103,0.009601204,0.49512213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000100045625,0.0006582345,0.44994745,0.00653826,0.0004545963,0.0034456542,0.07706651,0.0028309573,0.0028136128,0.24960123,0.20630114,0.00024235564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018366072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003234633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004697955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012768108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010252226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015716195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2984022105","doi":"10.1002/arcp.1059","title":"A contemporary review of three types of social influence in consumer psychology","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Consumer Psychology Review","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Feeling; Value (mathematics); Consumer behaviour; Psychology; Field (mathematics); Social psychology; Consumer research; Sociology; Marketing; Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.19796282585579192,"score_gpt":0.4314975249947388,"score_spread":0.2335346991389469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2984022105","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000122025005,0.9989452,0.000057095185,0.0002129839,0.00008282398,0.0000034819186,0.0000055646524,0.0000016476777,0.0005692441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011658131,0.9983576,0.000103726146,0.00014276215,0.000121644945,0.00000677566,0.000007290001,7.734885e-7,0.000093542425],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985499,0.0004788237,0.00021983382,0.00017634536,0.0005012538,0.00007385882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950525,0.0038146311,0.000391745,0.00006644071,0.00055538263,0.000119244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00227263,0.00095523347,0.0020225046,0.0072763916,0.00065381493,0.00257986,0.0008562996,0.0014294138,0.0032929387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053859805,0.00053178024,0.0010934789,0.010269004,0.0016122138,0.0026082539,0.0013186013,0.0017633507,0.0005590479],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006776622,0.00006539413,0.00068599853,0.09887487,0.00033236307,0.0001441692,0.00090110616,0.00018288296,0.00040366017,0.006884603,0.016393414,0.8750638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031762876,0.00018986923,0.009787515,0.12500998,0.0011783775,0.0016173583,0.0014724187,0.000172289,0.0003429678,0.00830908,0.8518026,0.00008585389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032751767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054016383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072763916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014977818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034310727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012018979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2988635626","doi":"10.1002/arcp.1057","title":"Psychological distance in consumer psychology: Consequences and antecedents","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Consumer Psychology Review","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Applied psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.1422172803700655,"score_gpt":0.5059852934695136,"score_spread":0.36376801309944806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2988635626","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6374553,0.19655868,0.008509655,0.03162523,0.00069040665,0.00019056503,0.00032789246,0.00004454859,0.124597766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9525204,0.04373128,0.0013123704,0.0010095781,0.00018102293,0.000036899997,0.000067895766,0.000007290383,0.0011331879],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981275,0.0008428598,0.00009224093,0.00020752904,0.00059528387,0.00013464218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98847616,0.007998039,0.0015973639,0.00021795211,0.0011383686,0.000572098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025015075,0.00025209034,0.00046771666,0.0013618189,0.0007959714,0.0040326025,0.00049038435,0.0011499878,0.006701165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009107451,0.0002682431,0.0004651226,0.0021692913,0.0038442104,0.0016112959,0.0021647688,0.0026045006,0.00027443818],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004689537,0.001725756,0.30963916,0.007992492,0.0011122647,0.0016707836,0.02227626,0.0017278508,0.0017588689,0.31786612,0.0075547425,0.32620677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007791158,0.00045528304,0.72093296,0.0062591727,0.00064601505,0.002181448,0.029134836,0.0026545676,0.0012470611,0.17913873,0.0570956,0.00017641905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036580819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039987434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006701165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017625894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015867212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022417665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2988805565","doi":"10.1002/arcp.1055","title":"How online word‐of‐mouth impacts receivers","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Consumer Psychology Review","topic":"Digital Marketing and Social Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Communication source; Word of mouth; Product (mathematics); Context (archaeology); Advertising; Task (project management); Computer science; Trustworthiness; Internet privacy; Psychology; Business; Engineering","score_opus":0.0534063255485246,"score_gpt":0.39251564749428347,"score_spread":0.3391093219457589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2988805565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9186732,0.01735687,0.002598735,0.0077381246,0.00031189248,0.00016736015,0.00034502996,0.000057891266,0.052750833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873159,0.0062154066,0.0009531466,0.0010135965,0.00020896748,0.000060195092,0.00013554725,0.00003203945,0.0040653106],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99613684,0.0023253018,0.00017492681,0.00029284926,0.0008236236,0.0002464117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9783562,0.015085501,0.003431334,0.00047085845,0.0019474976,0.0007086197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053741126,0.00024608406,0.00035311625,0.0005983365,0.00048071472,0.0027433883,0.00052460236,0.00094264024,0.012100966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03586383,0.00016078434,0.00052913337,0.0005906696,0.0006155267,0.0025922218,0.0012093126,0.0012790102,0.0012940197],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028016972,0.0018771142,0.24784195,0.003210358,0.0007687607,0.0006256549,0.022313792,0.000779647,0.005724113,0.012011485,0.011111839,0.6909336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036642936,0.0043042423,0.80949986,0.0039611566,0.0022384005,0.0014258205,0.037878156,0.005317965,0.0058535147,0.018789206,0.11015003,0.00021533424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018501898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011590796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012100966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066685927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005571661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040481746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311058662","doi":"10.1002/arcp.1085","title":"Wisdom from words: The psychology of consumer language","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Consumer Psychology Review","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Key (lock); Consumer research; Psychology; Space (punctuation); Consumer behaviour; Psychological research; Epistemology; Cognitive science; Sociology; Computer science; Social psychology; Marketing","score_opus":0.06042924730968198,"score_gpt":0.3554491577632699,"score_spread":0.29501991045358794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311058662","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034245268,0.6182643,0.018159924,0.1809374,0.003629562,0.00005797844,0.00011410553,0.000062911415,0.14452845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6363786,0.32651097,0.006163147,0.017460622,0.0056228824,0.00006792424,0.00006967654,0.000071073424,0.0076550916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99461347,0.0034014084,0.00021030857,0.00026281303,0.0013966676,0.000115221126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96694815,0.028004173,0.0014171021,0.0006313979,0.0026264663,0.00037266157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062713996,0.00032592053,0.00061130506,0.0054201894,0.0013956113,0.008888432,0.0008629967,0.0024788491,0.0031985084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019726956,0.00027205367,0.00027421143,0.0047879545,0.018148042,0.009002488,0.0014802044,0.003898282,0.00044770425],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006309751,0.00003748243,0.0015213806,0.0024782668,0.00007137881,0.0003879398,0.028889416,0.00045841228,0.0007674363,0.76434857,0.025526565,0.17545009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016849193,0.0000448197,0.006928735,0.0050718915,0.00004162674,0.0006922774,0.017680477,0.0007620806,0.0003613045,0.8038571,0.16447952,0.00006334711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002777391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003401612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008888432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030686625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032487896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033166766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313257027","doi":"10.1002/arcp.1088","title":"Reconsidering prosocial behavior as intersocial: A literature review and a new perspective","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Consumer Psychology Review","topic":"Digital Marketing and Social Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Prosocial behavior; Perspective (graphical); Psychology; Context (archaeology); Social psychology; Face (sociological concept); Interactivity; Neglect; Behavior management; Sociology; Computer science; Developmental psychology; World Wide Web; Social science","score_opus":0.22102556789914782,"score_gpt":0.48131197845629115,"score_spread":0.2602864105571433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313257027","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006702441,0.9986002,0.000078585865,0.0007254315,0.00015307595,0.000003580857,0.0000069889884,0.0000018324461,0.0003633138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010475663,0.99798954,0.00013979252,0.00048763215,0.00022983621,0.000009080874,0.000010858097,0.0000014651707,0.00008423354],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823123,0.0006248978,0.00028746735,0.00025703685,0.00050614023,0.00009324612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900484,0.007577127,0.000727682,0.0001322049,0.0012785683,0.00023593126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043131863,0.0014814833,0.0031486526,0.010101362,0.0008581881,0.0043239635,0.0017371097,0.003165845,0.004224525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008306515,0.0006980042,0.0016012455,0.011343127,0.0029375846,0.0065118507,0.0020777953,0.003820696,0.0010275602],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000098509176,0.00012786327,0.0009444052,0.11823478,0.0005194726,0.0002679231,0.0011203645,0.00036760166,0.00041701528,0.0316796,0.032865956,0.8133565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030769235,0.00012862655,0.0049204323,0.1812395,0.0013019149,0.0017313769,0.0018475656,0.00031805062,0.00023246878,0.0183885,0.78976476,0.00009599091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005104202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008081149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010101362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027310161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007156128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022810578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416614002","doi":"10.1002/arcp.70007","title":"How default choice architecture impacts downstream behavior: A taxonomy, theoretical framework, and research agenda","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Consumer Psychology Review","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Choice architecture; Salience (neuroscience); Default; Downstream (manufacturing); Categorization; Conceptual framework","score_opus":0.18834360923156349,"score_gpt":0.5260526918581612,"score_spread":0.3377090826265977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416614002","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63564014,0.062015448,0.18890482,0.035863057,0.0002238536,0.0007466417,0.00067284715,0.00031599833,0.0756171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9616698,0.013710688,0.022606298,0.00083029084,0.000056583747,0.00023814355,0.00018867564,0.000018856563,0.00068066665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975472,0.001282546,0.00012305005,0.0004105625,0.00043760202,0.0001990063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828006,0.012182279,0.0020143718,0.0009201294,0.0015375842,0.0005450497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00866322,0.00043309364,0.00090747135,0.0023016385,0.0010094893,0.0049284864,0.0023120663,0.001759023,0.0049871253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015014565,0.0004054182,0.0009880253,0.002206285,0.008412834,0.0061543216,0.0020413606,0.003376407,0.0003059183],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024171227,0.0005109018,0.076205224,0.0020258462,0.00017824174,0.00031078322,0.011250612,0.0031116595,0.0014259359,0.756625,0.0018496535,0.14626445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004416767,0.00022136571,0.077579714,0.0021771889,0.00020533382,0.00055497955,0.008130107,0.015393422,0.00064826774,0.88390684,0.01104272,0.00009593096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047271308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046277386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00866322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031644232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029773316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045816064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}