{"meta":{"query_hash":"dda502e845ba","filters":{"venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy"},"cohort_total":60,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":60,"exported":60,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/dda502e845ba","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Contemporary+Economic+Policy"},"results":[{"id":"W1491391816","doi":"10.1111/coep.12071","title":"PRIVATIZATION IN CHINA: TECHNOLOGY AND GENDER IN THE MANUFACTURING SECTOR","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Labor market dynamics and wage inequality","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Wage; Production (economics); Labour economics; Panel data; China; Economics; Business; Demographic economics; Econometrics; Economic growth; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.03170612572112049,"score_gpt":0.23797517445519156,"score_spread":0.20626904873407106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491391816","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980654,0.00024210569,0.00007981849,0.0003199421,0.00000410567,0.000004269694,0.00006966914,0.0000023455016,0.0012122527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999428,0.000085771564,0.000012441015,0.000025761303,0.000004404399,0.0000012794718,0.000041751842,4.1044254e-7,0.00040018762],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995154,0.00006412007,0.000023228378,0.000061474486,0.000108425906,0.0002273575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988519,0.00014273953,0.0006818938,0.00005394416,0.000083286635,0.00018630031],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062227354,0.00014293335,0.00020025429,0.00081667316,0.00082836166,0.00072060555,0.000253237,0.00028436226,0.002794734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011964793,0.00010974505,0.00028566906,0.0014174337,0.00083717617,0.0007880184,0.0008591478,0.0003389127,0.00012825805],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011723764,0.000085508436,0.9773794,0.000033044023,0.00003316776,0.00036409698,0.0014839001,0.0010485223,0.0009734898,0.004064731,0.00046352268,0.0139534185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032903624,0.000040345152,0.99706024,0.000010753901,0.000006823917,0.000031459935,0.0007549286,0.00067181344,0.00018525419,0.00051174447,0.0007196329,0.0000036410015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047947444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07485465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047947444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023330082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018869279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.095336676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518139746","doi":"10.1111/coep.12066","title":"WHY IS CASH (STILL) SO ENTRENCHED? INSIGHTS FROM CANADIAN SHOPPING DIARIES","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Digital Platforms and Economics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Payment; Cash; Value (mathematics); Business; Payment service provider; Payment card; Economics; Actuarial science; Commerce; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.017853666484683912,"score_gpt":0.19433584315519012,"score_spread":0.1764821766705062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1518139746","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9069903,0.0014524123,0.0012507829,0.008553911,0.000030781423,0.00017187503,0.004217783,0.00003513814,0.07729698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99054027,0.0010773236,0.000767349,0.00039802064,0.00001009225,0.000022072403,0.0010151616,0.0000139890835,0.006155667],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799347,0.00033047248,0.00007464708,0.00019299281,0.0008411904,0.00056720444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99216497,0.003130261,0.0009941695,0.0003288534,0.0026837813,0.0006978514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023087568,0.000380887,0.0005193714,0.0031094798,0.00635312,0.0064243795,0.0013798927,0.000851368,0.006764171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013283278,0.00029166215,0.00036942158,0.010093864,0.003255473,0.0018377588,0.0012439311,0.001246673,0.0005074017],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012469838,0.00057382556,0.57893634,0.0007404979,0.00016360065,0.0011485749,0.05504319,0.006681371,0.001335867,0.15344444,0.03868633,0.16199902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000089754845,0.00010591694,0.73831326,0.0006444655,0.00015473072,0.00013932865,0.10578262,0.012389685,0.00095112034,0.019637134,0.12149273,0.00029926046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99139893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9938385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06747222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06747222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039423954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4895475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1567297939","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7287.2007.00082.x","title":"GUEST EDITORS’ INTRODUCTION: SPORT AND PUBLIC POLICY","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Sports Analytics and Performance","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.03114074139803384,"score_gpt":0.2459824320744125,"score_spread":0.21484169067637865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1567297939","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000881258,0.008969491,0.00022839617,0.062056232,0.9194352,0.00002112177,0.00019328167,0.000083356776,0.008924785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001451006,0.009008667,0.0002037337,0.024565937,0.93737495,0.000037532427,0.00014446194,0.000080469916,0.027133165],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980556,0.00031348816,0.0002275643,0.000407696,0.000800546,0.00019505357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98124677,0.008364728,0.0009534784,0.0008504803,0.0060717273,0.0025127793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003099246,0.0030752632,0.0020948478,0.003542251,0.0020316937,0.0076545,0.0028622905,0.00717624,0.05383785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016321529,0.000687685,0.0014434232,0.002762339,0.0015549962,0.004335191,0.0019562598,0.009056124,0.025462154],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007511515,0.000006891205,0.00003198752,0.000068363806,0.0000023136422,0.000020837579,0.0000072476632,0.00003223705,0.000013366558,0.0006046956,0.99477696,0.0044275676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017874425,0.000020166099,0.0004127137,0.00036848144,0.0000107224905,0.000067069406,0.000050922747,0.00020001487,0.000043848988,0.002300473,0.9964945,0.000013224356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016439299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030751403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05383785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021022982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017577008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18010557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1913874550","doi":"10.1111/coep.12090","title":"THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN PHYSICIAN SUPPLY AND THE MIX OF GENERALIST AND SPECIALIST SERVICES USED","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Canadian Heritage","funders":"","keywords":"Liberian dollar; Physician supply; Business; Family medicine; Actuarial science; Health care; Medicine; Finance; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.03348629507157874,"score_gpt":0.2535881630220193,"score_spread":0.22010186795044057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1913874550","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9841164,0.0013653585,0.00076732744,0.0035381182,0.000011972729,0.000020803172,0.0037957963,0.000013901781,0.006370314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973761,0.0003780231,0.0001302652,0.00007856353,0.000019586148,0.0000051306515,0.00095916016,0.0000028814072,0.0010502279],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862945,0.00027322143,0.00013300378,0.00015914068,0.0005602569,0.00024498114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842935,0.005819889,0.007152918,0.00030095913,0.0011361026,0.0012966845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012398803,0.00010112993,0.0003279233,0.0014326321,0.00053695106,0.0013521815,0.00047088388,0.00052640686,0.0069360137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013612728,0.00022983256,0.0002889426,0.0030396958,0.0007826239,0.0006306671,0.00072165974,0.00059134414,0.00045652277],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040618004,0.000013845185,0.99429,0.000021993104,0.00006205946,0.00007318698,0.000196048,0.00073004444,0.00009488475,0.00084730063,0.0005641134,0.003065901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004425478,0.000015167971,0.996557,0.000015577134,0.000016305745,0.00008411961,0.0006308992,0.001176549,0.000033924087,0.00053925527,0.0009225117,0.000004244085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36509797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4726157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36509797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046945917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020855197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7259457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1955195427","doi":"10.1111/coep.12094","title":"“COERCIVE COOPERATION”? ONTARIO'S PAY EQUITY ACT OF 1988 AND THE GENDER PAY GAP","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pay Equity; Gender pay gap; Equity (law); Economics; Wage; Public economics; Labour economics; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05995661317583345,"score_gpt":0.31315541788038204,"score_spread":0.2531988047045486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1955195427","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8602679,0.0010131183,0.0007935878,0.035657056,0.00009854048,0.00007200903,0.0012128416,0.000019988654,0.1008649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99293596,0.000158272,0.00012587114,0.00070395856,0.000013906839,0.000016418076,0.000081744154,0.000002484766,0.0059614656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980386,0.0003932694,0.00005358483,0.000115860414,0.00061111816,0.00078758935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99656063,0.0010127082,0.0009018749,0.00016290347,0.0007567978,0.00060504803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019972364,0.00008783297,0.00021658039,0.00036785615,0.00276194,0.0016596698,0.00059188966,0.00087808265,0.0042524883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006548819,0.00011390212,0.00018566356,0.0008695832,0.0033264237,0.00062404753,0.00092780084,0.00070029055,0.00012766894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056940183,0.00013163495,0.42763832,0.00022806818,0.00011172619,0.0005474197,0.027361952,0.0035276173,0.0016236939,0.43043658,0.060493737,0.047329824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013209604,0.00010191492,0.8196949,0.00021686517,0.00007374921,0.000084928055,0.027447592,0.002381495,0.00082913873,0.0145271225,0.13446043,0.000049676804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9478103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9709926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052189708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03504299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040370908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25425583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969504654","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7287.2011.00303.x","title":"LABOR MARKET DISCRIMINATION AND CAPITAL: THE EFFECTS OF FAN DISCRIMINATION ON STADIUM AND ARENA CONSTRUCTION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Sports Analytics and Performance","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Stadium; Capital (architecture); Labour economics; Population; Production (economics); Microeconomics","score_opus":0.026398154349991057,"score_gpt":0.21652648979571323,"score_spread":0.19012833544572216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969504654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953695,0.00019219557,0.00047875606,0.0004480136,0.000009918475,0.000010320608,0.00019166055,0.0000047360404,0.003294826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992842,0.000034400615,0.000055521123,0.000024196515,0.000010132085,0.0000032405683,0.00007443192,0.0000010509834,0.00051280647],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876094,0.0004032844,0.000049021466,0.00014414532,0.00016444497,0.00047812806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876266,0.004394207,0.005463838,0.0005719424,0.0003414451,0.0016019671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001136208,0.00026791389,0.00037735954,0.0007860392,0.0007415896,0.0014936627,0.0006437672,0.0011141835,0.009479675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077151563,0.00015587501,0.00051358185,0.0011641536,0.0013927069,0.00076029776,0.0012117114,0.0011804771,0.0006268044],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034299295,0.0005606123,0.9751864,0.000025088122,0.00005199098,0.00022794303,0.00026113866,0.00620596,0.0004807529,0.0044244207,0.00066566037,0.0115671465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030242216,0.0002717481,0.9781068,0.000030204515,0.000043624066,0.00008203597,0.0008028306,0.013142052,0.0005566999,0.005510801,0.0014051697,0.000017880178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015571502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02354365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015571502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021824816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008481818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03171265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971057808","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7287.2000.tb00013.x","title":"Does NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) Chapter 19 make a difference? Dispute settlement and the incentive structure of U.S./Canada unfair trade petitions","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Free trade agreement; Incentive; International trade; Settlement (finance); Economics; Economic integration; Trade barrier; International economics; Free trade; Business; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01699964295345845,"score_gpt":0.19191884457383923,"score_spread":0.17491920162038077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971057808","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24817404,0.01240849,0.003606525,0.16389678,0.0015587172,0.0002919156,0.01056841,0.0001773263,0.55931777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9167556,0.0056840023,0.0023509923,0.013951469,0.00047585933,0.0001203464,0.0029877014,0.00006945415,0.057604585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.994495,0.00051297934,0.00015041232,0.00033637084,0.0026516218,0.0018534843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98947936,0.0022278351,0.0016802115,0.00032002458,0.005245148,0.0010475186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054246867,0.00020067937,0.00053721695,0.0021747355,0.0039524776,0.008424294,0.0010331037,0.0021360423,0.011649986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020735636,0.00021446342,0.00037379653,0.004205981,0.003725602,0.0021401392,0.0008341113,0.0019127178,0.0010463514],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028018336,0.00016215621,0.07617938,0.00018924708,0.00011300157,0.00034159352,0.0030663628,0.002281834,0.0005302415,0.575526,0.25557047,0.0857595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010496745,0.00008189075,0.3168861,0.00052066904,0.00018864092,0.0001577638,0.005163367,0.002658407,0.00077506166,0.09582864,0.57746786,0.00016656189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91529936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95110744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.084700644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041555718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06139756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30150926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971886956","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7287.2001.tb00062.x","title":"LABOR DEMAND AND THE WAGE GAP IN THE WEST BANK AND GAZA STRIP","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gaza strip; West bank; Economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Wage; Labour economics; Palestine; Labor demand; Demographic economics; Geography","score_opus":0.03043261982063819,"score_gpt":0.3010082263130732,"score_spread":0.27057560649243506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971886956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965224,0.00041967558,0.000019932133,0.00083490874,0.000007800557,0.0000015856957,0.00012691338,0.0000014327111,0.00206535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988103,0.0002916868,0.000015025699,0.000075669304,0.00000721993,0.000004285915,0.00010748512,0.0000011915139,0.0006871497],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996897,0.00007474123,0.000017477822,0.000032951863,0.00003353775,0.0001516218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994677,0.00013746375,0.00020903625,0.00001551818,0.000047530713,0.0001228425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005862293,0.00017074624,0.00020723774,0.0012487741,0.0011595003,0.0020530918,0.00033470622,0.000634568,0.0028635482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016729573,0.00021463813,0.00013643646,0.0016467049,0.0012883628,0.0009189051,0.0010126324,0.0007411805,0.0004361845],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000753809,0.0003003668,0.9424875,0.000100153266,0.00006384235,0.00073381944,0.008399237,0.002854828,0.0013514014,0.013546201,0.0034809832,0.025927888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004278149,0.000076371274,0.9813696,0.00006440558,0.000012072564,0.00012872244,0.010433701,0.0007879808,0.00024566182,0.001874666,0.004952797,0.0000111816635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032184184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042695265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032184184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022757049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013747135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06399369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977724013","doi":"10.1111/coep.12036","title":"MINIMUM WAGE EFFECTS ON PERMANENT VERSUS TEMPORARY MINIMUM WAGE EMPLOYMENT","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Minimum wage; Economics; Labour economics; Wage; Efficiency wage; Demographic economics","score_opus":0.06239507152687966,"score_gpt":0.3746889291447537,"score_spread":0.31229385761787404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977724013","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9159094,0.004626843,0.0022878586,0.0055116606,0.00023208212,0.00012986311,0.02604533,0.000089888366,0.045167066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98500746,0.0011951773,0.00029692185,0.00027264832,0.000076638666,0.0000289243,0.003877417,0.0000151065115,0.009229764],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99651283,0.00032452226,0.00017409082,0.00028781118,0.0012675328,0.0014333184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915896,0.002510083,0.0033951576,0.00029327167,0.0013035731,0.0009083413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021639552,0.00027907226,0.00066452805,0.0022911658,0.0009791991,0.0015671521,0.0012316445,0.00068562035,0.013511489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012113549,0.00024298228,0.00097427354,0.0028897237,0.0010319307,0.0006748883,0.0018603029,0.0019361988,0.00079567754],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007034935,0.00012255034,0.89375484,0.00047899704,0.0003845034,0.000320495,0.0014482728,0.008616116,0.0006051266,0.023352124,0.01621332,0.054000173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027331786,0.000064069325,0.9872328,0.00012891533,0.00012282957,0.00004160725,0.0009921477,0.0014938625,0.00018566496,0.0013429007,0.008352223,0.000015544945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.79561484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8619327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79561484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006577665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41117764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982056773","doi":"10.1093/cep/byh030","title":"Multicultural Evaluation of the Performance of Contingent Valuation for Forest Fire Prevention","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Contingent valuation; Willingness to pay; Prescribed burn; Valuation (finance); Ethnic group; African american; Economics; Multiculturalism; Welfare; Demographic economics; Socioeconomics; Geography; Psychology; Political science; Forestry; Finance; Sociology","score_opus":0.17866906183845901,"score_gpt":0.2808515460939956,"score_spread":0.10218248425553658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982056773","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925443,0.00022811636,0.0016943176,0.00022486692,0.000035878275,0.00006527988,0.00005223879,0.000019069445,0.005136085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983901,0.00007944304,0.0011614054,0.00003495442,0.00002338456,0.000024313405,0.000072823415,0.000005026071,0.00020859373],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907136,0.0077023217,0.00021446378,0.00034376897,0.0008400721,0.00018570173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91290754,0.07183757,0.0046911985,0.0045867893,0.0039017072,0.0020752545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022701375,0.00055175036,0.00056175765,0.0011153542,0.0009426214,0.001921229,0.0007216543,0.0006502433,0.0023704749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.081658356,0.00018253936,0.0007671823,0.0009547831,0.0011749039,0.0019197052,0.0013274079,0.0010739015,0.00023572281],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.037567012,0.014633537,0.50122863,0.00055353466,0.0013810522,0.00058617996,0.0039276835,0.08583243,0.0041925246,0.026140098,0.004188982,0.3197684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024078893,0.018109618,0.6079979,0.00022532216,0.00067326153,0.00044906596,0.004558386,0.33671293,0.0069074687,0.016708981,0.005005285,0.00024390592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057480386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033616244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022701375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020154323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007506844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12005776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984357323","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7287.2006.00030.x","title":"STRATEGIC BEHAVIORS TOWARD ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION: A CASE OF TRUCKING INDUSTRY","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Truck; Trucking industry; Heavy duty; Anticipation (artificial intelligence); Business; Production (economics); Agency (philosophy); Transport engineering; Economics; Engineering; Microeconomics; Automotive engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.06957116009468112,"score_gpt":0.2848330300196124,"score_spread":0.2152618699249313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984357323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909561,0.000053494423,0.0016315673,0.0012639147,0.0000044097224,0.000025116247,0.000025222509,0.0000059803733,0.006034316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986187,0.00007083778,0.0007198987,0.00010860783,0.000005107412,0.00001358132,0.000019733508,0.0000012591125,0.0004423076],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963121,0.0022998138,0.00013860533,0.00025579197,0.0005210164,0.00047270366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812136,0.011010916,0.0050078,0.0010661064,0.0011515161,0.00054994883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054670423,0.00020931214,0.0002560633,0.0014382921,0.0030955134,0.0024683797,0.00064907037,0.00224269,0.0011131115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014186283,0.00024259154,0.00042254172,0.0027718947,0.0033631409,0.0015952284,0.0013651743,0.0015732305,0.000097332166],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035643633,0.0017252367,0.6723361,0.00013908438,0.0001817826,0.012805506,0.082065664,0.04075979,0.0038177727,0.1425501,0.003358807,0.039903734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029319353,0.00082162506,0.46980926,0.00020842011,0.00019070235,0.0029113183,0.25966066,0.15159933,0.004600018,0.06772157,0.041790307,0.000393643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10184307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13278511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10184307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004140538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037574104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20250052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989917121","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7287.2008.00114.x","title":"ESTIMATING THE IMPACT OF BEER PRICES ON THE INCIDENCE OF SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES: CROSS‐PROVINCE AND TIME SERIES EVIDENCE FROM CANADA","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Gonorrhea; Pooling; Economics; Econometrics; Ordinary least squares; Sample (material); Instrumental variable; Demographic economics; Chlamydia; Demography; Statistics; Mathematics; Medicine; Chemistry","score_opus":0.024821900401980092,"score_gpt":0.23720952955488728,"score_spread":0.21238762915290718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989917121","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9861458,0.0021199153,0.00056455436,0.0010863628,0.00003159314,0.000033561097,0.0068405545,0.0000325236,0.0031451276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919275,0.0013327908,0.00042065987,0.000107436674,0.0000128533675,0.000008247017,0.0049180146,0.000010504207,0.0012619032],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998054,0.00040214974,0.00015039023,0.00026242356,0.0006186608,0.00051237154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98736703,0.0038463895,0.0027452488,0.00062761124,0.004349893,0.0010639264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002727656,0.00048704608,0.00069433363,0.0022166343,0.001573166,0.0019921712,0.0014165153,0.00061189785,0.002540386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0128634395,0.00041622957,0.0011801792,0.0072974153,0.0010014662,0.0004803075,0.0010781809,0.0012309514,0.00026453455],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001693044,0.000066244436,0.97978413,0.00008179666,0.00066396326,0.00016433411,0.0005188074,0.0051384103,0.00015793552,0.0006371582,0.0027607968,0.0098571945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021862143,0.000029223826,0.9922765,0.000043513446,0.00026701952,0.000028260083,0.0009431125,0.0042055915,0.00012699398,0.00014103386,0.0018903434,0.000026469066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9971571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019470707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019470707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024347423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14127052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016444857","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7287.2007.00065.x","title":"CRIMINAL SENTENCING GUIDELINES AND JUDICIAL DISCRETION","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lockheed Martin (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Sentencing guidelines; Judicial discretion; Legislature; Punishment (psychology); Context (archaeology); Ex-ante; Political science; Criminal law; Set (abstract data type); Law; Law and economics; Economics; Criminology; Judicial review; Psychology; Social psychology; Sentence; Macroeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.12348154184183346,"score_gpt":0.27786410570394765,"score_spread":0.15438256386211419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016444857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7638051,0.0038169147,0.031655535,0.021663068,0.00012298762,0.00008606449,0.0005664809,0.00016516684,0.17811865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99706453,0.00024767147,0.0010115752,0.00024011417,0.00005754178,0.000019165846,0.000051463718,0.000012680628,0.0012951774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861377,0.0064637302,0.00089229,0.001215867,0.0031392945,0.0021512015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93879086,0.034665618,0.017635584,0.0023886801,0.004761931,0.0017572949],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063309586,0.00020101585,0.00055646664,0.002147413,0.0016656877,0.004475693,0.0010958816,0.00215045,0.004708469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060246453,0.00049281423,0.00026887143,0.0022844633,0.0047588507,0.0030084192,0.0018718231,0.0027240848,0.00057153817],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009326902,0.00012960265,0.0200506,0.00006503793,0.00005008746,0.00019379074,0.0013559613,0.019907756,0.00051877904,0.9262604,0.0036312419,0.02774341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016136898,0.00014544255,0.087649055,0.00022547905,0.00007483743,0.0002096083,0.0019447735,0.023086676,0.0005998073,0.86197853,0.023810942,0.00011346364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010843271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015353277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010843271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047003548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049290266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034103572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016782638","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7287.2008.00133.x","title":"IS NORTH‐SOUTH TRADE‐RELATED TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION REGIONAL?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Economic Growth and Productivity","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; Index (typography); Diffusion; International trade; Dimension (graph theory); Economic geography; Economics; International economics; Regional trade; Developing country; Geography; Free trade; Economic growth; Political science","score_opus":0.04215925848294869,"score_gpt":0.22958503660630764,"score_spread":0.18742577812335895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016782638","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8774869,0.005253402,0.008927054,0.0075809397,0.000057994017,0.000027527523,0.00034231893,0.00006131982,0.100262664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99658716,0.0012979135,0.0006653687,0.00024060329,0.000040758154,0.0000065735417,0.000070376576,0.0000087732315,0.0010824949],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951077,0.00010987039,0.000032184922,0.00016347549,0.00007727575,0.000106365485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960748,0.0014663251,0.0015941997,0.00031480513,0.00035069985,0.00019918689],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012830312,0.00015226762,0.000387502,0.0009202619,0.0005265664,0.002293531,0.0002846547,0.00053749944,0.0076505896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037450683,0.00013800344,0.0005870216,0.0017812441,0.001648596,0.0024526955,0.0012681838,0.0006974237,0.0006789659],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054001866,0.00014396565,0.55223346,0.0009087331,0.0005389716,0.0017138533,0.008416431,0.0057933037,0.009810523,0.28138736,0.0048759105,0.1336375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000098605975,0.00016706758,0.7323165,0.00053119595,0.00044592246,0.0023616443,0.010796245,0.0073081255,0.0054419576,0.16874343,0.07171587,0.00007337865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028479467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002952863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076505896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081647345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061571767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025593758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032649586","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7287.2007.00079.x","title":"PARTICIPATION IN PHYSICAL ACTIVITY AND GOVERNMENT SPENDING ON PARKS AND RECREATION","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Urban Transport and Accessibility","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":164,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Recreation; Physical activity; Public economics; Government (linguistics); Business; Sample (material); Demographic economics; Economics; Political science; Medicine; Physical therapy","score_opus":0.04995435648396143,"score_gpt":0.3694596104292854,"score_spread":0.3195052539453239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032649586","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98789155,0.0006637131,0.00033680155,0.0009092801,0.000012887856,0.00001302199,0.0039157863,0.000018247925,0.006238752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931677,0.0006283169,0.00016115597,0.00007486918,0.000030291458,0.000023923012,0.004440725,0.000004622331,0.001468405],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999012,0.00040068963,0.00006569323,0.000117513606,0.00020963194,0.00019441832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99251467,0.0019884924,0.0043367646,0.00023049116,0.00035436088,0.0005751313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006772049,0.0002102785,0.00034570985,0.0013647103,0.00030778532,0.0012380849,0.00033907237,0.00056408084,0.005948376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053226063,0.00014404475,0.00025940867,0.00418888,0.00058652356,0.0005481215,0.00088243483,0.0007396368,0.0007663746],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050218805,0.00006534226,0.984894,0.00004450616,0.00007398142,0.00006488132,0.00029140085,0.0011134391,0.00008504578,0.0016324577,0.0022657427,0.009419054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000364483,0.00003829917,0.99584097,0.000019740988,0.000015901831,0.0000817522,0.0004730719,0.00075766543,0.000033446697,0.00037709426,0.0023549688,0.0000034866255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020367365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031514134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020367365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009053003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047714927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0404976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041904462","doi":"10.1111/coep.12027","title":"ECONOMIC FREEDOM, SPORT POLICY, AND INDIVIDUAL PARTICIPATION IN PHYSICAL ACTIVITY: AN INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Sport and Mega-Event Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Per capita; Gross domestic product; Economic freedom; Product (mathematics); Physical activity; Economics; Political science; Demographic economics; Public economics; Economic growth; Sociology","score_opus":0.08877086221338878,"score_gpt":0.39943567194511104,"score_spread":0.3106648097317223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041904462","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9891235,0.001188557,0.00013206818,0.00029231695,0.000013610962,0.000010761368,0.0007927429,0.0000034189202,0.008443176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978276,0.00057750347,0.000072735966,0.000023717253,0.000016336768,0.000010187967,0.0010772682,0.000003213745,0.0003914984],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993967,0.00022399993,0.00003978715,0.00008501981,0.000078918056,0.00017559201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99761474,0.0007176888,0.0009856907,0.0001416777,0.00018945268,0.0003508557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012103607,0.00026204312,0.00036675893,0.0028054055,0.00037489535,0.0012410389,0.0002922857,0.00033510147,0.006380236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029771533,0.00010725472,0.0005587882,0.006142169,0.00083060405,0.0009053805,0.0013698061,0.00050457683,0.00033592674],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030673397,0.00021577481,0.9804109,0.00008418686,0.00025588388,0.00012719016,0.00086663844,0.0008906689,0.00011108311,0.004366433,0.0008018647,0.0115627535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009572974,0.0000740151,0.9965429,0.000032655356,0.00005112405,0.000045068136,0.0012135444,0.0002917154,0.00003141286,0.00036445062,0.0013387452,0.000004916221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057694707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076213325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006380236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040225833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024442942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021344006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043972103","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7287.2009.00177.x","title":"THE EFFECTS OF THE 1996 U.S.‐CANADA SOFTWOOD LUMBER AGREEMENT ON THE INDUSTRIAL USERS OF LUMBER: AN EVENT STUDY","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Softwood; Stock (firearms); Event study; Stock price; Economics; Agricultural economics; Business; Pulp and paper industry; Engineering; Geography","score_opus":0.01359676911798707,"score_gpt":0.2276492013870598,"score_spread":0.21405243226907272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043972103","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937729,0.00022198283,0.00011666511,0.00083766814,0.000018447892,0.000033700926,0.0010143738,0.000005883022,0.003978316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99744874,0.00034268285,0.000066737346,0.00022367763,0.000033702065,0.000012764101,0.00067418895,0.0000019667345,0.0011955607],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909186,0.00020734202,0.00003825374,0.00007532569,0.00027641634,0.0003107554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914643,0.0027942937,0.0034934103,0.00021473112,0.0010703157,0.0009628929],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011508946,0.00020445135,0.00024757208,0.0009109974,0.0013603864,0.0020107133,0.00048063547,0.00068959343,0.0023868834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005755369,0.00013515403,0.00025391977,0.0015609888,0.0009686822,0.0006651449,0.0008036611,0.0011225642,0.0002021065],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00081317977,0.0008811999,0.96960574,0.00004494796,0.00014427585,0.00055082113,0.0014442031,0.0028556879,0.0004797472,0.002769021,0.0067981207,0.013613029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033568598,0.00013025297,0.9902249,0.000014420598,0.00004060782,0.000037513604,0.0036508758,0.002324677,0.0003787891,0.00031151832,0.002830268,0.00002271181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7011848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.75324935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2988152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075810067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035001207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6011499},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049265543","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7287.2009.00179.x","title":"AN ANALYSIS OF INTERNATIONAL PRICE DIFFERENTIALS ON EBAY","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Price dispersion; Currency; Homogeneous; Monetary economics; Differential (mechanical device); Price level; International economics; Econometrics","score_opus":0.07969993991309801,"score_gpt":0.4199138451723509,"score_spread":0.3402139052592529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049265543","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9887369,0.00056054274,0.00071536953,0.00017695951,0.000014850985,0.000014081967,0.00077485514,0.000022615526,0.008983892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99811506,0.00015213861,0.00023522311,0.00001907215,0.000015898142,0.000005864199,0.00083199365,0.000011137956,0.00061362464],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989838,0.00026422672,0.00008436564,0.00019189385,0.00034842774,0.0001272783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900214,0.004611211,0.0032864544,0.0006921637,0.0010235292,0.00036506428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016291669,0.00020728575,0.00047222181,0.0022065865,0.0005092572,0.0019168449,0.00056069985,0.00047606076,0.004061954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01691484,0.00017726378,0.0003849154,0.0050484147,0.00070533535,0.0022932398,0.000994604,0.00094564917,0.0005777758],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005853274,0.00075634016,0.7223995,0.0004973985,0.0006203249,0.0018134904,0.0040811324,0.027275829,0.007454143,0.070309386,0.014827632,0.14411151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008975515,0.0004061127,0.9349256,0.00007240173,0.00013449245,0.00083737593,0.0033533724,0.03286371,0.0024592734,0.0114730345,0.013293395,0.00009144279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004685417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032279524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004685417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013043525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018879297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013588607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052189783","doi":"10.1111/coep.12049","title":"CENTRAL BANK STRATEGIC FORECASTING","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Economics; Transparency (behavior); Volatility (finance); Central bank; Inflation (cosmology); Monetary policy; Monetary economics; Inflation targeting; Empirical evidence; Financial economics","score_opus":0.18125767988787014,"score_gpt":0.24261815193048655,"score_spread":0.06136047204261641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052189783","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2646502,0.005645653,0.4449873,0.033802938,0.001172104,0.00042671032,0.0018598922,0.0012486987,0.24620645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817469,0.00087471015,0.011252955,0.00047001513,0.00014637668,0.00006166977,0.00020850461,0.00001741818,0.005221415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970983,0.001031717,0.00018336625,0.0004860961,0.0008629795,0.00033746692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893497,0.0045328136,0.002859888,0.0012761304,0.0016476741,0.00033385036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005564484,0.00067228684,0.00061679457,0.0011168784,0.0010578275,0.004471667,0.0009639945,0.0020160251,0.0068629165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023625435,0.00038884766,0.00054888637,0.0023377358,0.0010559144,0.0032373723,0.00093644124,0.002124104,0.0014325005],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024015344,0.00007787471,0.019889286,0.00024308811,0.00014891784,0.0003803942,0.0012354504,0.09025227,0.0011164632,0.7543675,0.0249169,0.10713172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000088163266,0.00005537886,0.005343274,0.00019043594,0.00011709379,0.0001977005,0.0007100767,0.20496987,0.0016825853,0.7553227,0.031248674,0.00007405833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009013606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074116345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009013606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029030873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045770505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029428124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061321588","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7287.2011.00269.x","title":"ECONOMIC VALUATION OF MORTALITY‐RISK REDUCTION: STATED PREFERENCE ESTIMATES FROM THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Willingness to pay; Demography; Contingent valuation; Payment; Valuation (finance); Payment card; Economics; Actuarial science; Medicine; Finance","score_opus":0.2137929885786001,"score_gpt":0.24280445857465008,"score_spread":0.029011469996049977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061321588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97323984,0.0021600123,0.0015158661,0.0007959597,0.00001587189,0.00013422141,0.0069841053,0.000013729624,0.015140443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932821,0.000810896,0.0008280867,0.000083044455,0.000003957792,0.00003472415,0.003929214,0.0000052237233,0.0010228402],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980217,0.0007864982,0.00013755159,0.00010916494,0.0006911893,0.00025391195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864725,0.0077865627,0.0009396155,0.0005157027,0.0037936266,0.00049198157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053451667,0.00039916363,0.00050161156,0.0018687369,0.00090073934,0.0016588058,0.00066372834,0.00038788727,0.0043273172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024830548,0.000187477,0.0009737567,0.0047726803,0.0006397158,0.00076605804,0.00070655945,0.0006608482,0.00019330604],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003730722,0.00049189746,0.7680862,0.0010632729,0.0016506863,0.00059179205,0.0044316645,0.059538532,0.00047980755,0.025955684,0.026125412,0.10785438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043279177,0.00024707222,0.9001878,0.0004156499,0.00039847742,0.00022480784,0.006498601,0.070690535,0.00048783518,0.0064553316,0.013737642,0.00022353581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9494815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93451816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050518513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018009774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008097517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13067067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065934449","doi":"10.1093/cep/byg027","title":"Modeling the Legislator as an Agent for the Party: The Effects of Strict Party Discipline on Legislator Voting Behavior","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Legislator; Voting; Legislature; Position (finance); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Ideology; Straight-ticket voting; Economics; Split-ticket voting; Politics; Legislation","score_opus":0.08259083200667151,"score_gpt":0.3738517335757591,"score_spread":0.2912609015690876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065934449","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9443457,0.000359304,0.030181183,0.002751298,0.000055731216,0.000072358955,0.00011956286,0.000039740444,0.022075072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99380374,0.0002015705,0.0024720263,0.00014196221,0.00004687524,0.000052133764,0.00003939078,0.0000133961985,0.003228809],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99478674,0.0039999983,0.00008292735,0.00031119635,0.00021701545,0.0006021318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96573114,0.027044654,0.0041996515,0.0012154569,0.00070117955,0.0011079834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008200656,0.00050698715,0.0009293748,0.0008663108,0.0016835588,0.0035263295,0.0013917192,0.0025056873,0.009709081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032591037,0.0005342295,0.00079569354,0.0014260963,0.0032051024,0.0029700089,0.00233019,0.0030740001,0.0014083849],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018696577,0.0012909578,0.16594298,0.00018452144,0.00033840904,0.00044550106,0.0052330536,0.3999741,0.0020911912,0.37995797,0.0028611051,0.039810516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003949971,0.0006975089,0.029064177,0.000044905406,0.00025339262,0.000095265685,0.0023083866,0.8350005,0.00051480596,0.12671454,0.004843406,0.000068076755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011511122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01438694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011511122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002581243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017153315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04336977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068791046","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7287.2007.00057.x","title":"“SPILLOVERS” AND PRODUCTIVITY: THE CASE OF THE TAIWANESE HIGH‐TECH FIRMS","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Economic Growth and Productivity","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Human capital; Bachelor; Production (economics); Marginal product; Economics; Labour economics; Total factor productivity; Capital (architecture); Demographic economics; Business; Monetary economics; Microeconomics; Economic growth; Geography","score_opus":0.039965673128293015,"score_gpt":0.2196034678288807,"score_spread":0.1796377947005877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068791046","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99451905,0.00090979453,0.00058589416,0.00049376895,0.00000435148,0.000011000318,0.00014067856,0.000008771757,0.0033265876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991079,0.000279629,0.00008456301,0.000020935546,0.000011008075,0.0000040040873,0.000087001805,6.040438e-7,0.0004044758],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997212,0.00008034502,0.00001603751,0.000045415716,0.000038197904,0.00009860293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99519926,0.0023512014,0.0015009992,0.00019648834,0.0003020472,0.00045005334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009005518,0.00023873623,0.00029819235,0.002117489,0.0006012752,0.0013238083,0.0002713266,0.0005055385,0.0040957746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040845824,0.00012631957,0.00038981784,0.0021486864,0.0007579308,0.00086085795,0.0011262456,0.0005645945,0.00029672417],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002609798,0.0001657685,0.9497424,0.00010346525,0.00026265418,0.0028839824,0.0015071172,0.008601503,0.0011259333,0.0069413586,0.0010278303,0.027376989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004713069,0.0000982883,0.9802172,0.000062219624,0.00015522314,0.00037799508,0.0032638945,0.008281486,0.00070569565,0.0044929637,0.002274742,0.000023183553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041172087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03419108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041172087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013539231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062750676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08186489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071075205","doi":"10.1111/coep.12028","title":"SPORTS, EXERCISE, AND LENGTH OF STAY IN HOSPITALS: IS THERE A DIFFERENTIAL EFFECT FOR THE CHRONICALLY ILL PEOPLE?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Physical Activity and Health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Physical activity; Stroke (engine); Diabetes mellitus; Chronic disease; Population; Physical therapy; Disease; Chronic stroke; Gerontology; Demography; Intensive care medicine; Environmental health; Rehabilitation; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.015385572184743674,"score_gpt":0.2860094209152348,"score_spread":0.2706238487304911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071075205","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9481594,0.0081393095,0.00040231814,0.016934602,0.00014187612,0.00005903615,0.021766886,0.000029631898,0.0043668738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98431474,0.0028076144,0.00014727886,0.0008189681,0.00011580243,0.000017793258,0.009273858,0.0000061982064,0.0024976772],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990723,0.00022641261,0.000066773275,0.000114586575,0.0001597888,0.00036004485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936699,0.0022945167,0.0023235083,0.00013575508,0.00045640746,0.0011199935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000927837,0.0003141563,0.0007379396,0.0016328637,0.0004672225,0.0017955526,0.00079936534,0.0011656104,0.00717644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007418321,0.00021935147,0.0009602476,0.0036366708,0.0008746531,0.0005593075,0.0009438018,0.0014381051,0.00059185753],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011440666,0.000030270867,0.9903689,0.000041699677,0.00014066463,0.00007215793,0.000056888905,0.0010485647,0.00002906826,0.00039805917,0.0032788408,0.0044204025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003366699,0.000060863596,0.99459743,0.000065024615,0.00012426171,0.000036658483,0.000580201,0.0019848207,0.000033149336,0.00041172418,0.0020617764,0.000010380845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6320625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6354059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6320625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046809316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003110145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74020875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078873555","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7287.2011.00307.x","title":"GENDER EARNINGS DIFFERENCES IN CHINA: BASE PAY, PERFORMANCE PAY, AND TOTAL PAY","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Wage; Earnings; Gender pay gap; Demographic economics; China; Labour economics; Economics; Performance-related pay; Parental leave; Hourly wage; Incentive; Accounting; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03064653169213814,"score_gpt":0.2733804608152404,"score_spread":0.2427339291231023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078873555","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99755573,0.00008634531,0.0000653474,0.00010083446,0.000006018973,0.000007428422,0.00068441534,0.0000039267975,0.0014898438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99821126,0.000056658937,0.00005729795,0.000025803833,0.0000075206526,0.000008802761,0.0009179225,0.0000010521674,0.0007137009],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996476,0.000037635506,0.000027977032,0.000055458957,0.000113610055,0.00011776501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884963,0.00014599517,0.00042948284,0.00007674112,0.0002144507,0.00028371872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068185077,0.0002928631,0.00023833891,0.001782283,0.0006457065,0.0004913351,0.00036207022,0.0002090975,0.002332103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014493004,0.00010684365,0.00028976524,0.0024732384,0.0004384157,0.0003588199,0.00067518844,0.0002813047,0.00020768853],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025438541,0.000022177905,0.99277496,0.000011913881,0.000026468373,0.00008034875,0.00055698195,0.0001837534,0.00010871009,0.00054147013,0.0005419252,0.005125884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025134068,0.000012598522,0.9986028,0.0000041769304,0.0000068762433,0.000014143867,0.0003131116,0.00037656043,0.000047861646,0.00010675064,0.00050932716,0.0000032335167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.097793125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12812789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.097793125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010358257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010856113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19444782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083156063","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7287.2001.tb00045.x","title":"INFLATION TARGETING AND THE ECONOMY: LESSONS FROM CANADA'S FIRST DECADE","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Inflation (cosmology); Monetary policy; Productivity; Inflation targeting; Recession; Restructuring; Private sector; Spillover effect; Monetary economics; Macroeconomics; Economic policy; Economic growth; Finance","score_opus":0.055548866295234235,"score_gpt":0.2340819031966325,"score_spread":0.17853303690139827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083156063","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21295848,0.14739998,0.0011943724,0.24392955,0.0013742142,0.000082244616,0.0030084278,0.00008890983,0.38996387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8500097,0.1063428,0.0009087465,0.013210816,0.00039160816,0.00002663974,0.0008170997,0.000051222374,0.028241308],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997846,0.00013264013,0.000046748737,0.000075282,0.000690535,0.0012088239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99678254,0.0004414594,0.00022329431,0.00006643403,0.0017485068,0.00073776604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016283047,0.00040196988,0.0006620703,0.0024631945,0.006890362,0.008119204,0.0011844491,0.0025716496,0.003132987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057565663,0.00021723931,0.0005399426,0.006223365,0.002936589,0.0020824454,0.001651897,0.0035706768,0.00028012978],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033839274,0.00020941847,0.047987107,0.0006675367,0.00012398562,0.0017680929,0.008529888,0.008530697,0.00035616473,0.6616352,0.11057793,0.15927553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016458782,0.00015251311,0.16112706,0.00271915,0.00026356702,0.00056101405,0.019343749,0.006575378,0.0012627152,0.08179297,0.72579724,0.00024001692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.993901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9955052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8919113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.108088695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14879839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78424203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085659021","doi":"10.1111/coep.12044","title":"IS EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION BASED ON TOBACCO USE EFFICIENT?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Demographic economics; Medical costs; Business; Economic cost; Duration (music); Variety (cybernetics); Environmental health; Demography; Economics; Actuarial science; Medicine; Statistics; Health care; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.10525084526721121,"score_gpt":0.29632577743248967,"score_spread":0.19107493216527846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085659021","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9327023,0.0023907947,0.0043011736,0.011758239,0.00012652573,0.00005048469,0.0005990362,0.000036300982,0.04803512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980894,0.00026960514,0.00010932028,0.00035539822,0.000066038214,0.0000043847076,0.00006634791,0.0000039167767,0.001035581],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972965,0.0009193901,0.00013816095,0.00029493927,0.0005071339,0.0008438986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9811782,0.009382,0.006528358,0.0013978913,0.0007376999,0.0007758519],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028789858,0.00025559962,0.0007248631,0.0015326762,0.0006386635,0.0031651484,0.0008232484,0.0015803379,0.009828919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020956956,0.0003103722,0.000635716,0.0015026989,0.002986896,0.0021201074,0.0018825638,0.0014896905,0.0007333024],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004934145,0.00041426023,0.7283184,0.00012038507,0.00028336613,0.0008168283,0.0006510485,0.008244062,0.00084856304,0.16188756,0.0058558555,0.09206632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000828633,0.00016436141,0.7474035,0.0002610761,0.0001609274,0.00075806887,0.002426482,0.028134784,0.0006016254,0.21137024,0.008577076,0.00005902284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073620058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077371816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009828919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017851372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088592013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03288102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088743416","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7287.2011.00298.x","title":"DO GAMBLERS THINK THAT TEAMS TANK? EVIDENCE FROM THE NBA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Sports Analytics and Performance","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Basketball; Incentive; League; Economics; Point (geometry); Perception; Affect (linguistics); Advertising; Microeconomics; Marketing; Business; Psychology","score_opus":0.1680982212688883,"score_gpt":0.26571469425207817,"score_spread":0.09761647298318987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088743416","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98144376,0.0011484895,0.0007449981,0.0037870079,0.00006941196,0.000035985388,0.00090895424,0.000020141053,0.011841287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99383,0.0010985989,0.00021842092,0.00069479895,0.00014319108,0.000037267837,0.0009930857,0.000009313628,0.0029752876],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844486,0.00074688357,0.000112633155,0.0002644761,0.0002920515,0.00013914109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95449954,0.019308576,0.020114318,0.0017006698,0.0018770075,0.0024998751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042845383,0.00038130244,0.00053143926,0.00096344814,0.00078834663,0.0016169624,0.0005782601,0.0010540365,0.01698175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028492523,0.0002830804,0.00037063845,0.0011925873,0.0010322611,0.0012880432,0.00087723543,0.001950434,0.0028561687],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009730597,0.00065452204,0.95682675,0.00013519399,0.00029230874,0.00010162739,0.0017976876,0.00037603985,0.00018728735,0.002257804,0.008506211,0.027891383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006482006,0.0001330559,0.9895405,0.00008527572,0.00007090287,0.000057543715,0.0023235236,0.001280602,0.00007871027,0.0024017973,0.003943865,0.00001946251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017911958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014855008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017911958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041154886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030558772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056809604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100870282","doi":"10.1111/coep.12037","title":"COMMERCIAL REVITALIZATION IN LOW‐INCOME URBAN COMMUNITIES: THE HOLDUP PROBLEM AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT POLICY","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Monopolistic competition; Negotiation; Profitability index; Economics; Economies of agglomeration; Industrial organization; Business; Profit (economics); Competition (biology); Microeconomics; Finance","score_opus":0.03247945094782165,"score_gpt":0.22850632717628444,"score_spread":0.1960268762284628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100870282","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8403281,0.0016384858,0.03328916,0.01898237,0.000039605573,0.000107190805,0.00021224367,0.00008423033,0.10531865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957765,0.00030258665,0.00042110294,0.00010125731,0.000010633674,0.000019183906,0.000014405894,0.0000046163163,0.0033496881],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993351,0.00028903232,0.000011637499,0.00007348794,0.00005453031,0.00023611265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99755895,0.0012349354,0.00053730543,0.000082416926,0.00023037287,0.00035605064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011407987,0.00022460945,0.00042433394,0.00052520924,0.0017007485,0.003347088,0.0009278436,0.0017276865,0.007891593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041820155,0.00025635154,0.00031349715,0.0007998522,0.0029306083,0.0031481872,0.0017953679,0.0013991658,0.00029477495],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000109807785,0.00018022076,0.013489379,0.00010075415,0.000031697167,0.0007031758,0.0011051752,0.1262345,0.00059220736,0.82231903,0.006916445,0.028217616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001003011,0.00020051698,0.014650716,0.00020876313,0.000056058314,0.00034129687,0.009404498,0.35694465,0.00085279596,0.59163046,0.025546024,0.0000638679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027080664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03566668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027080664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053987824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027520012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05384606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105793266","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7287.2010.00195.x","title":"ECONOMIC TRANSITION AND THE GENDER EARNINGS GAP IN CHINESE INDUSTRY: THE ROLE OF FIRM CHARACTERISTICS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Labor market dynamics and wage inequality","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Wage; Economics; Constraint (computer-aided design); Competition (biology); Labour economics; Budget constraint; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.01876000984096787,"score_gpt":0.23725554244030325,"score_spread":0.21849553259933538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105793266","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988417,0.00017031115,0.000041815467,0.00013424714,0.0000035260996,0.000003502191,0.0001930889,0.0000016956241,0.0006101532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99941874,0.00007542726,0.000009995095,0.000014810527,0.000005472469,0.0000015517326,0.00025332076,4.7314472e-7,0.0002202823],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996921,0.000032221935,0.000018890109,0.000049235823,0.000058655638,0.00014885624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988299,0.00019576549,0.0005678293,0.000056052464,0.000092088834,0.0002583597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060344156,0.00015176667,0.00025869388,0.0013610512,0.00072964415,0.00083981117,0.0003189654,0.0002915037,0.002471231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013352596,0.00008460231,0.00028624377,0.0017510226,0.00056255196,0.0004997896,0.0008948935,0.00041290498,0.00022762404],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051454906,0.000031442865,0.993533,0.000009933665,0.000024075664,0.00012814559,0.0005166016,0.00017962919,0.00014727106,0.0005431367,0.00033055537,0.0045047696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017195474,0.000011109006,0.99856913,0.0000040252803,0.000006938604,0.000015102038,0.00057762896,0.0004453897,0.000040733954,0.000086561886,0.00023991072,0.0000018583753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057396896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0719286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057396896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000861893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072733994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11412561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117315274","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7287.2008.00112.x","title":"POLITICAL AFFILIATION AND PERCEPTIONS OF TRADE: EXAMINING SURVEY DATA FROM THE STATE OF GEORGIA","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Works and Government Services Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; State (computer science); Perception; Survey data collection; Economics; Political economy; Political science; Identification (biology); Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.17913346213601344,"score_gpt":0.3920466652070283,"score_spread":0.21291320307101486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117315274","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986331,0.000022187343,0.000022270679,0.00007131995,0.0000013032318,0.0000037191178,0.00043352685,8.284975e-7,0.00081163546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990864,0.00005246084,0.000049571066,0.000036244906,0.000001989711,0.0000073203632,0.00051242195,0.0000011034485,0.00025235224],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99954575,0.00018277747,0.000030798637,0.000058690355,0.00008688567,0.00009517958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99786973,0.0005265498,0.00094669167,0.00012109209,0.0002305429,0.00030546018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000661345,0.00012727463,0.00015942246,0.0013119165,0.0007185463,0.00069220585,0.00031424436,0.00039829794,0.0017400053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002482025,0.00016357853,0.00017048382,0.002706035,0.00046830595,0.0003783927,0.000805185,0.00057500124,0.0005316657],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024043184,0.00003547481,0.99405944,0.0000148490535,0.000023498567,0.000048933394,0.002743334,0.00006822218,0.00017422589,0.00015809425,0.00053223054,0.0021178361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011665207,0.000015521973,0.9953662,0.000009301312,0.0000046856053,0.000022241791,0.003912736,0.00009770788,0.000021344182,0.00002958018,0.00051732885,0.0000022474685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0905048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26552367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0905048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085600914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068293104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17995602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126030489","doi":"10.1093/cep/byh024","title":"Central Bank Behavior, the Institutional Framework, and Policy Regimes: Inflation Versus Noninflation Targeting Countries","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Fiscal Policies and Political Economy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Inflation targeting; Monetary economics; Inflation (cosmology); Monetary policy; Exchange rate; Central bank; Output gap; Interest rate; Taylor rule; Exchange-rate regime; Developing country; Independence (probability theory); Macroeconomics; International economics","score_opus":0.03210740960925263,"score_gpt":0.2606513837178506,"score_spread":0.228543974108598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126030489","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9840687,0.0016565096,0.0017889084,0.00063282653,0.000023029676,0.000017585522,0.00045431234,0.000043076092,0.011315127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977284,0.0006498415,0.00023286515,0.00007086546,0.000024928817,0.000009207132,0.0003326449,0.000009749314,0.0009413495],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914503,0.00042745407,0.000074184594,0.00010092415,0.00008568467,0.00016679059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901468,0.0033186784,0.005143247,0.00028746744,0.000624207,0.00047964044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00230729,0.00029429927,0.00056967355,0.0014456669,0.00040257676,0.0026795617,0.0003175533,0.0004804273,0.0032821249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009545377,0.00021525132,0.00037729318,0.0022438434,0.0009205574,0.0011662485,0.0006374245,0.0007285991,0.0006479464],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011642763,0.0002469682,0.87419224,0.0002191724,0.00049675856,0.0005910718,0.0013673438,0.031836115,0.0014142524,0.04857713,0.0053650974,0.034529552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034693565,0.00045362272,0.892073,0.00024112075,0.00069849455,0.0006167624,0.0041301716,0.054607417,0.004627135,0.02554222,0.016579827,0.000083388644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009984262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011179629,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009984262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016150329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082619546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01985228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140500819","doi":"10.1111/coep.12015","title":"PERSISTENT EFFECTS OF TRANSITORY EXCHANGE RATE SHOCKS ON FIRM DYNAMICS","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Depreciation (economics); Exchange rate; Economics; Monetary economics; Shock (circulatory); Currency; Econometrics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.015655918894559757,"score_gpt":0.19757654512491546,"score_spread":0.1819206262303557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140500819","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981305,0.00012456893,0.00031417646,0.00014097063,0.0000041606013,0.000006388847,0.000184135,0.000008836356,0.0010862179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999655,0.00008020679,0.000036811107,0.000017146987,0.0000051745183,0.0000015780321,0.000075107186,7.0212116e-7,0.00012839385],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99955934,0.0001156483,0.000055589615,0.00008330914,0.00006116782,0.00012487509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98679185,0.0055547967,0.006261952,0.0006399437,0.0002473994,0.0005041175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012342692,0.00015951491,0.0003493054,0.00060415117,0.00024358838,0.0015936914,0.00025144173,0.00067681744,0.003990847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009442969,0.0001678026,0.0002009191,0.0007523463,0.00066772517,0.00095974,0.00075949286,0.001039361,0.00028728184],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018619776,0.00026005975,0.9222212,0.000125945,0.00019810113,0.00092965487,0.00049894315,0.018845614,0.007321475,0.009655775,0.0010874479,0.03699381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045572036,0.0003771546,0.97625357,0.00002058393,0.00005305743,0.00022453218,0.00054973306,0.016240813,0.0012964085,0.0042165783,0.0006987145,0.000023227069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020797274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029334398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003990847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079028076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000214324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013350725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143330982","doi":"10.1093/cep/byl018","title":"Introductory Remarks for the <i>Contemporary Economic Policy</i> Special Section on “Monetary Policy Issues of New EU‐Member and Candidate Countries”","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Global Financial Crisis and Policies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Citation; Member states; Special section; Political science; Library science; Law; Economics; European union; Computer science; Economic policy; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.022163697207715907,"score_gpt":0.253246743950823,"score_spread":0.23108304674310706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143330982","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00092760444,0.008075578,0.004528623,0.51994765,0.34002683,0.00017852848,0.0021809228,0.0004200967,0.12371414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01238431,0.007935507,0.0050142547,0.4301048,0.1727635,0.0006446349,0.0017151127,0.0007428142,0.36869508],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884844,0.0003017046,0.000111532274,0.00014597399,0.00038745586,0.00020482471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99531174,0.0024117134,0.00038233085,0.00019220053,0.0013696651,0.0003322743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025643748,0.0011551264,0.0010686518,0.0019252166,0.0037080524,0.004320719,0.0023804642,0.008420909,0.06945155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010490913,0.00052674237,0.0016993895,0.0017149207,0.0014313359,0.0037929025,0.0026535466,0.010756584,0.03075143],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014199865,0.000009120274,0.000041116426,0.000041771127,0.000002047238,0.000037810736,0.000068611764,0.000026065172,0.000085663516,0.011060967,0.9864976,0.002114978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011742484,0.000014843636,0.0007364816,0.00016766223,0.0000070159977,0.000041164076,0.00019198992,0.00008594694,0.00014563247,0.011966653,0.9866128,0.000018120632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0097586755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015924279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06945155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032247978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019482455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23233855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155890464","doi":"10.1111/coep.12159","title":"HOW DID EXCHANGE RATES AFFECT EMPLOYMENT IN <scp>U.S.</scp> CITIES?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Depreciation (economics); Spillover effect; Exchange rate; Economics; Manufacturing sector; Affect (linguistics); Labour economics; Manufacturing; Demographic economics; Monetary economics; Business; Macroeconomics; Human capital; Economic growth","score_opus":0.14394555146400997,"score_gpt":0.264810154019596,"score_spread":0.12086460255558604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155890464","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966629,0.00020888585,0.00010654885,0.0008274117,0.000014881371,0.000004238388,0.0008613194,0.000006970735,0.0013068385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980829,0.0001554355,0.00003775037,0.000081576734,0.00001869114,0.0000042772385,0.0008268334,0.000004895598,0.0007876565],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963105,0.0001414188,0.000022777998,0.000063706524,0.000035618534,0.000105389314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99648154,0.0009756242,0.0017196329,0.00015016187,0.0003197617,0.0003533229],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008337462,0.00031503508,0.00033719622,0.000809108,0.0004176471,0.0018889874,0.00034464433,0.0005615122,0.0036951888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039690696,0.00017020915,0.00049765396,0.0020205239,0.0005156713,0.00062060833,0.0008129981,0.00092522264,0.00081366004],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002592502,0.000084623534,0.9897742,0.000023345361,0.00019006261,0.0001882599,0.0003773178,0.0026683407,0.0001761618,0.0010622104,0.0015889423,0.0036072019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028276696,0.000070003785,0.99180275,0.000019013809,0.000101318474,0.000041905547,0.0014870315,0.004244641,0.00026532725,0.00045342883,0.0014754165,0.000010898425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05428034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0500304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05428034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008580556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004537161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10792881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158385558","doi":"10.1093/cep/byg013","title":"Age Discrimination in Employment in Canada","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Retirement, Disability, and Employment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Work & Health; University of Toronto; Public Works and Government Services Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Age discrimination; Legislation; Enforcement; Retirement age; Employment protection legislation; Political science; Business; Economics; Labour economics; Economic growth; Law; Unemployment","score_opus":0.19582712929299578,"score_gpt":0.38948908428528634,"score_spread":0.19366195499229055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158385558","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39962518,0.047160767,0.0006206275,0.18824358,0.0014358556,0.00012593286,0.0013892907,0.00004884002,0.36134997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93586874,0.0232316,0.00030341232,0.008987042,0.00021240297,0.0000154966,0.00022888005,0.00000977582,0.031142619],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99710244,0.0001940341,0.00006879549,0.00010509576,0.0011263699,0.0014032193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970817,0.00040626895,0.00031218448,0.000043136035,0.0013842281,0.00077250926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013554546,0.00018435743,0.0002483345,0.0020889998,0.014551838,0.0046089096,0.0008360967,0.0017780106,0.0043758815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004756026,0.00016698985,0.00027253217,0.0045595337,0.0039484305,0.0006650606,0.0017295528,0.0016658534,0.00017181778],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009377708,0.00009320868,0.10632857,0.0006469805,0.000046676018,0.0019324553,0.033090334,0.0026902608,0.00070156297,0.43337637,0.20157498,0.21942483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020700933,0.000057844092,0.43019542,0.0014977589,0.000061510684,0.00049819,0.052119646,0.0016659861,0.00030483774,0.020719234,0.49271762,0.00014119712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99643964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.099652916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.099652916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16281837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72303593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168408824","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7287.2007.00072.x","title":"WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR AMATEUR SPORT AND RECREATION PROGRAMS","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Recreation; Willingness to pay; Contingent valuation; Economics; Estimation; League; Amateur; Nonmarket forces; Valuation (finance); Agricultural economics; Public economics; Geography; Microeconomics; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.12069676339552585,"score_gpt":0.2677700860615567,"score_spread":0.14707332266603088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168408824","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9613018,0.0002914808,0.0018942298,0.0008597791,0.000016495882,0.00010044241,0.0023080613,0.000031806714,0.033196013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99278176,0.00013056365,0.00052134896,0.000050464096,0.000010150407,0.000026918266,0.0010858501,0.0000033398483,0.00538961],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907255,0.0002565895,0.000020040681,0.000064917316,0.0003898332,0.0001960399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984125,0.0006716778,0.00029934448,0.000090459886,0.00026187868,0.00026414994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009681479,0.00015857708,0.00018336205,0.0009900084,0.0007040791,0.0012365021,0.00044209056,0.00051874336,0.007578532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006249519,0.00012236965,0.00018233286,0.0014318274,0.0004944663,0.00043015098,0.00036295358,0.0004632383,0.00047485632],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032725965,0.00036428706,0.82072896,0.0000811591,0.00010746032,0.00037260234,0.001962576,0.014084434,0.0009802526,0.02482785,0.020887824,0.11527538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001843672,0.000109423556,0.9618363,0.00003815637,0.000024368568,0.0001360172,0.002720401,0.016934557,0.00017126807,0.0037124406,0.014270953,0.000027685403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4185248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5872732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4185248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057818308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024948225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8321774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169468530","doi":"10.1093/cep/byg023","title":"The Optimal Time to License a Biotech “Lemon”","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Capital Investment and Risk Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"License; Externality; Business; Dilemma; Genetically modified organism; Biotechnology; Agricultural science; Economics; Industrial organization; Microeconomics; Biology; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.025052845870266374,"score_gpt":0.22719303040838057,"score_spread":0.2021401845381142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169468530","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61013865,0.0044099283,0.11729441,0.030933464,0.00061238377,0.0003561495,0.0014124783,0.00037867515,0.23446396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97638845,0.0011904559,0.003640992,0.00043115782,0.000118110314,0.00006270734,0.00011599388,0.000041240888,0.018010905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934036,0.00020950794,0.000035012457,0.000103965285,0.00008653304,0.00022468863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947438,0.003381074,0.00093701173,0.0001344668,0.00029972466,0.0005038229],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024632039,0.00041341127,0.0005671516,0.00059378176,0.00075148675,0.0030744576,0.0007015179,0.0034340855,0.025184365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011519167,0.00057471386,0.00037143996,0.00040523408,0.0012484258,0.004707646,0.00089044514,0.0024520925,0.0021148438],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018915961,0.00048555635,0.007954763,0.00039072818,0.00010661503,0.0009538553,0.00048797097,0.12369963,0.008348112,0.735208,0.021128403,0.09934493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037102148,0.0008786978,0.011110096,0.00026996233,0.00014298796,0.0009104889,0.001968613,0.20546037,0.004877404,0.7335004,0.040373713,0.00013618567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026257208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019747335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025184365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002470165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022677062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08425009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2191984260","doi":"10.1111/coep.12497","title":"DEPARTURE AND PROMOTION OF U.S. PATENT EXAMINERS: DO PATENT CHARACTERISTICS MATTER?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Trademark; Promotion (chess); Patent office; Duration (music); Business; Psychology; Marketing; Actuarial science; Demographic economics; Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.27247656598121445,"score_gpt":0.24618361591732363,"score_spread":0.02629295006389082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2191984260","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99745387,0.0005102535,0.00007543838,0.0005024179,0.000009412533,0.0000046317055,0.00040024178,0.0000045412753,0.0010392694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986085,0.00024935667,0.000032698907,0.000049327795,0.000028883938,0.000003227481,0.00041056622,0.0000016668306,0.0006157251],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991345,0.00021939959,0.000099162746,0.00016094981,0.000187992,0.0001980215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9514503,0.014039137,0.02640414,0.0011762524,0.0017064061,0.0052237394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031800931,0.00012722972,0.00029781475,0.00204115,0.0005250881,0.0016853365,0.0004573266,0.0009029447,0.0034344052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02149001,0.00013913104,0.0002348918,0.0024112093,0.0007104533,0.0012020996,0.0007209597,0.0009454471,0.0010199313],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004279306,0.000037576323,0.99560285,0.0000078112025,0.000014289183,0.000040920517,0.00019695495,0.000068719615,0.00006915001,0.00014755732,0.000227834,0.003543489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004363724,0.00005359689,0.9985851,0.0000118495645,0.000009363582,0.000056041397,0.00038699494,0.00019328926,0.000088355046,0.00015724619,0.0004507098,0.0000031198206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077377316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012376199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077377316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047156485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052897754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016818106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253265735","doi":"10.1111/coep.12278","title":"DO TAX CUTS ENCOURAGE RENT SEEKING BY TOP CORPORATE EXECUTIVES? THEORY AND EVIDENCE","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Taxable income; Economics; Discretion; Economic rent; Tax policy; Corporate tax; Equity (law); Public economics; Rent-seeking; Income tax; Microeconomics; Tax reform; Monetary economics; Accounting; Tax avoidance; Politics","score_opus":0.06152131243846949,"score_gpt":0.2773884872606069,"score_spread":0.2158671748221374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253265735","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9484252,0.009545146,0.0009957117,0.00770371,0.00008591511,0.000048835354,0.00052062265,0.000021342075,0.032653548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955375,0.0025172133,0.00013663559,0.00077545317,0.00009035248,0.000008373001,0.00011252689,0.000003460424,0.00081862556],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.998589,0.0005366469,0.00007663671,0.00025208376,0.00030144045,0.00024419682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9337142,0.039335206,0.021959987,0.0020430486,0.0017951962,0.0011523718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029215573,0.000272247,0.0005183934,0.0009810111,0.00056739355,0.0017182408,0.0008019807,0.0016386424,0.009717126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024013635,0.000311374,0.00037575385,0.0010013083,0.00212601,0.0011109959,0.0006985036,0.0012207894,0.0009648431],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020121643,0.0023294792,0.8360003,0.0013726649,0.00083776365,0.0004795316,0.0013778469,0.0027144616,0.00093677733,0.03205634,0.0069650076,0.11291755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024153502,0.0004411333,0.96450573,0.0004938628,0.0003225894,0.00021295092,0.0021238467,0.0020793711,0.0010108053,0.01649222,0.012040711,0.000035195306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005754523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004871884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009717126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009363698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048823416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032507062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2285602426","doi":"10.1111/coep.12167","title":"HOW DOES SKILLS MISMATCH AFFECT REMITTANCES? A STUDY OF FILIPINO MIGRANT WORKERS","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Remittance; Instrumental variable; Affect (linguistics); Demographic economics; Migrant workers; Educational attainment; Unit (ring theory); Work (physics); Labour economics; Economics; Business; Psychology; Economic growth; Econometrics","score_opus":0.019090603243854608,"score_gpt":0.296526687993088,"score_spread":0.2774360847492334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2285602426","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999446,0.00008351295,0.000016421372,0.00006831239,0.000001136011,0.0000028232025,0.00004622922,3.8862765e-7,0.0003351965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99943775,0.000103458704,0.00001818827,0.00002160953,0.000004108603,0.0000045578777,0.000065449145,3.6293423e-7,0.00034454218],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995005,0.00022891098,0.000031025796,0.00005378721,0.00005408823,0.00013171555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975585,0.00077655737,0.0011125345,0.000118030395,0.00016114036,0.00027327664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009922755,0.0001997636,0.00023134517,0.0006907083,0.0009769994,0.000609702,0.00037462593,0.00054297934,0.0017861921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043919445,0.00011627338,0.00021444993,0.0011024845,0.00045761553,0.0005891417,0.00080180244,0.0004964373,0.00031873438],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013586262,0.0001954872,0.98790634,0.000026097541,0.00003923807,0.00026761062,0.004033047,0.00013219973,0.00036589152,0.0002150195,0.00014076199,0.0065424643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019190281,0.00011255637,0.9938951,0.000009234882,0.00001024701,0.00004946384,0.0053829104,0.00011940498,0.00007444568,0.00005544238,0.00028680914,0.0000024609244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02050743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029574964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02050743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056242675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003459835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040776134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296337659","doi":"10.1111/coep.12148","title":"WILLINGNESS‐TO‐PAY FOR SPORTING SUCCESS OF FOOTBALL BUNDESLIGA TEAMS","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Football; Willingness to pay; Payment; Contingent valuation; Outcome (game theory); Promotion (chess); Business; Marketing; Public good; Valuation (finance); Economics; Advertising; Actuarial science; Microeconomics; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.18723084497128073,"score_gpt":0.28533652032218926,"score_spread":0.09810567535090853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2296337659","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959157,0.00011970754,0.00022581738,0.00025896015,0.0000089365585,0.000008820061,0.00015184509,0.0000033595002,0.003306915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993918,0.000025376137,0.000026588536,0.000013733819,0.0000045695238,0.0000058484125,0.000101052916,6.2532035e-7,0.0004303931],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999134,0.00037316803,0.000045135184,0.00008371443,0.00013595504,0.00022809672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99492973,0.0021267247,0.0014543453,0.00018971413,0.0002492,0.0010502203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018602285,0.00015523988,0.00027640394,0.0007722515,0.00036991376,0.001499475,0.0002854295,0.0006750746,0.0075536375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0078614615,0.00011772729,0.00037735308,0.0005165218,0.00038828942,0.0005577838,0.00060083723,0.0005644684,0.0008402406],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000459769,0.00033519638,0.97783846,0.000032390508,0.00013453011,0.0001341345,0.000830577,0.0018113971,0.00031477318,0.0020896478,0.0013407242,0.014678434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019750658,0.00018944067,0.9935468,0.000017906204,0.000025853136,0.00009169676,0.0015773067,0.0025272889,0.000052527415,0.0011442087,0.00079246634,0.000014711636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058307108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043785954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075536375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006567552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029986753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025269449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2389303895","doi":"10.1111/coep.12178","title":"OUTPUT GROWTH AND STRUCTURAL REFORM IN LATIN AMERICA: HAVE BUSINESS CYCLES CHANGED?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Market Dynamics and Volatility","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Recession; Real gross domestic product; Gross domestic product; Volatility (finance); Monetary economics; Commodity; Business cycle; Latin Americans; Gross output; Structural break; Macroeconomics; International economics; Econometrics; Production (economics); Market economy","score_opus":0.03878574365376211,"score_gpt":0.24091117747424537,"score_spread":0.20212543382048326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2389303895","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94433033,0.00616064,0.0008826279,0.016651228,0.00008885758,0.000015125789,0.00084126025,0.000060488906,0.030969461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949248,0.0027457927,0.00016107336,0.00032513554,0.00012636272,0.000005108552,0.00039912682,0.000014272711,0.0012983188],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998313,0.000039204802,0.000012003346,0.000031233405,0.00003095525,0.00005521097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874,0.00020991892,0.0006852658,0.000057529414,0.00018151365,0.00012573537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079958973,0.0001981759,0.00027726754,0.0008432287,0.0003585908,0.002677888,0.00027259687,0.0006351522,0.0025298526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034741955,0.00012601411,0.00022538111,0.0022470646,0.0011561326,0.0013660314,0.00078523066,0.00081650814,0.00020864898],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062455283,0.00017558933,0.6996876,0.00047824855,0.00019954493,0.0010257406,0.006199665,0.015299559,0.004074198,0.14001787,0.009516648,0.12270076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046490128,0.00008188949,0.91516274,0.00015087285,0.000056404013,0.00015763026,0.0039617848,0.0070848973,0.0011626079,0.027669419,0.04443009,0.000035166024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017235281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012450298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017235281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023546326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009335454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03426993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589804851","doi":"10.1111/coep.12217","title":"SALARY INEQUALITY, TEAM SUCCESS, LEAGUE POLICIES, AND THE SUPERSTAR EFFECT","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Sports Analytics and Performance","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Salary; Superstar; League; Endogeneity; Inequality; Labour economics; Economics; Distribution (mathematics); Collective bargaining; Demographic economics; Business; Econometrics; Mathematics; Advertising; Market economy","score_opus":0.04318266548265131,"score_gpt":0.27360611566406573,"score_spread":0.2304234501814144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2589804851","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9894639,0.0007409076,0.0025114473,0.0012545056,0.000022704922,0.000017049922,0.00036822614,0.000021213064,0.005600035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982029,0.00021080884,0.00013881529,0.000056524077,0.000031240696,0.0000067460883,0.0001691364,0.000002994558,0.0011807563],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999255,0.0002899298,0.000037080375,0.00010573627,0.00010832119,0.00020400861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98943186,0.0050345818,0.0038736577,0.00029510085,0.00027097543,0.0010938863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015560121,0.00023904875,0.00047339406,0.00074152387,0.0005698981,0.0017522082,0.000535215,0.0006407681,0.011392988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008690574,0.00014365725,0.0003091033,0.0010089407,0.0010477962,0.00078835833,0.0011167363,0.0009974008,0.00066588254],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000611538,0.00028052295,0.92518574,0.000077503224,0.0002984793,0.00035976758,0.0005396902,0.02392586,0.00042118062,0.025680503,0.0032634684,0.019355733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000878823,0.00046083846,0.9314926,0.00007981531,0.00013727733,0.00012560305,0.0017280708,0.042193297,0.00035861015,0.02047124,0.002840332,0.000024484785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019848062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018112767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019848062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012746844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005978594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03946507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607918626","doi":"10.1111/coep.12238","title":"GOVERNMENT BOND YIELDS AT THE EFFECTIVE LOWER BOUND: INTERNATIONAL EVIDENCE","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Balsillie School of International Affairs; Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Government bond; Monetary policy; Monetary economics; Economics; Interest rate; Central bank; Yield (engineering); Empirical evidence; Bond; Government (linguistics); Quantitative easing; International economics; Finance","score_opus":0.0874844308995889,"score_gpt":0.2811053538648001,"score_spread":0.19362092296521122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607918626","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8351309,0.030450014,0.0063181105,0.0051140077,0.000174024,0.000029337185,0.0018760362,0.00014081364,0.120766856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918715,0.0062356675,0.00027747426,0.00013048999,0.000121589794,0.000005950779,0.0004185443,0.000020796699,0.0009181476],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980856,0.0006463222,0.0001691525,0.00039232595,0.00055362884,0.00015297721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9590362,0.020093586,0.012577158,0.0024731245,0.0052643158,0.0005555908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00343739,0.0003301754,0.0007092225,0.0011675779,0.00050296413,0.00372784,0.00059657637,0.0009857946,0.005860419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02627429,0.00026726027,0.00021968658,0.0032081064,0.0017675218,0.0025269757,0.00094293756,0.001934505,0.0019118694],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0058563272,0.00073995016,0.39531574,0.0017774011,0.0012022025,0.0010766155,0.0042386116,0.022171019,0.0034537576,0.23297861,0.023433968,0.30775586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003079936,0.0010831727,0.7624803,0.0019189445,0.0010128916,0.0009704221,0.004257588,0.015752416,0.014720638,0.092187285,0.105081044,0.00022725799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027411361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009216593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005860419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072663085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028534676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01960504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2738760258","doi":"10.1111/coep.12241","title":"EMPLOYMENT EFFECTS OF THE MINIMUM WAGE: PANEL DATA EVIDENCE FROM CANADIAN PROVINCES","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Minimum wage; Economics; Instrumental variable; Panel data; Ordinary least squares; Wage; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Immigration; Prime (order theory); Econometrics; Geography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.18907864016491197,"score_gpt":0.41606678779843353,"score_spread":0.22698814763352157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2738760258","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9013061,0.012274301,0.00071900734,0.006706467,0.00015759551,0.000096611664,0.051446643,0.000060409682,0.027232908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9785734,0.005038164,0.0003672792,0.00044054215,0.000034880457,0.00003072775,0.011915125,0.00001701949,0.0035829027],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964618,0.00068926945,0.00021118805,0.00033780228,0.0012449767,0.0010549407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832243,0.0040379553,0.003539482,0.001033211,0.007049987,0.0011150492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004000126,0.0003745115,0.0010073623,0.0026033884,0.0028213381,0.0022366673,0.0016873112,0.00055326486,0.0038693303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01754826,0.00037885582,0.0010214176,0.010086682,0.0010041891,0.00050207967,0.0011435356,0.0010937132,0.00039746804],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068425783,0.00011879884,0.91258585,0.00063346245,0.0008258859,0.00022125778,0.002894843,0.0063341353,0.00028359386,0.0042736926,0.02977234,0.041371882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035294364,0.000022568582,0.984812,0.00018003139,0.00020770633,0.00001424594,0.0016918023,0.0010561887,0.00015304178,0.00019528082,0.0115979565,0.000033879194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9972676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026123386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026123386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038335647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18953937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755093261","doi":"10.1111/coep.12270","title":"MEGA‐EVENTS AND TOURISM: THE CASE OF BRAZIL","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Sport and Mega-Event Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tourism; Mega-; Quarter (Canadian coin); Football; Economy; Economic impact analysis; Event (particle physics); Geography; Economics; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.05909873994195015,"score_gpt":0.3747687921857741,"score_spread":0.31567005224382394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755093261","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87494785,0.0026600373,0.00035116563,0.006553221,0.000032684617,0.000055110413,0.00037241864,0.000013772165,0.11501379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953062,0.0016077011,0.00008690043,0.00016613139,0.000007804036,0.000008446258,0.0000594126,0.0000038927683,0.002753476],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99974054,0.00007010278,0.0000070615993,0.000017253094,0.000029521536,0.00013547762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995061,0.00013600918,0.00010442864,0.000022884447,0.00008179432,0.00014887411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041737047,0.0002024085,0.00018519114,0.00090769026,0.0015448587,0.0020603675,0.00043399085,0.00059577235,0.0046811407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014587506,0.00012638103,0.00043365135,0.0016620148,0.001195306,0.00092099304,0.0015725162,0.000599719,0.00018626038],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028301473,0.00047305934,0.44284597,0.0008823575,0.00022663103,0.017518511,0.04395956,0.008307207,0.0018658488,0.3928364,0.017038716,0.07376275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000085606895,0.00019328328,0.6273286,0.0012385069,0.000265852,0.0029116753,0.16393785,0.012786589,0.000746189,0.030489737,0.15993166,0.00008456202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.294773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37948453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.294773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050356477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021832648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5861145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769007514","doi":"10.1111/coep.12267","title":"INEQUALITY IN MORTALITY OVER THE LIFE COURSE: WHY THINGS ARE NOT AS BAD AS YOU THINK","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Global Health Care Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development","keywords":"Inequality; Demographic economics; Public health insurance; Life course approach; Mortality rate; Economics; Demography; Economic growth; Sociology; Health insurance; Health care; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.15084857419659187,"score_gpt":0.48893129381857897,"score_spread":0.3380827196219871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769007514","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017363356,0.04578822,0.0004596037,0.9275539,0.0030011542,0.0000051187485,0.00022356102,0.000017071512,0.005588021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6931081,0.104535416,0.0009881677,0.17867422,0.018809201,0.000041607917,0.00034386394,0.00007245796,0.0034269148],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974879,0.0011466794,0.00014519092,0.00029371187,0.0005765437,0.0003499133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99204224,0.0032525014,0.0011076569,0.00032543318,0.0017727724,0.0014995018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005194737,0.0002966068,0.0005985826,0.0010190489,0.0019288651,0.003726944,0.0006973539,0.002872711,0.004225917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022793815,0.00021802368,0.00038701284,0.0012623552,0.0064355377,0.005739616,0.0016414453,0.007524719,0.0011146007],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029978034,0.00016101147,0.15237936,0.0010520205,0.0003978615,0.00044199353,0.018719405,0.00046484525,0.00037822712,0.07573391,0.43448365,0.31548792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000101460544,0.00024832398,0.29110044,0.0058556395,0.00028886416,0.00076086266,0.039683778,0.0008653999,0.00041542645,0.41084692,0.2496196,0.00021326459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023123529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028663069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023123529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00260844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023161266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04597789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769966633","doi":"10.1111/coep.12265","title":"REMOVING THE “VEIL OF IGNORANCE”: NONLINEARITIES IN EDUCATION EFFECTS ON GENDER WAGE INEQUALITIES","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Labor market dynamics and wage inequality","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Earnings; Wage; Distribution (mathematics); Quantile; Quantile regression; Inequality; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Econometrics","score_opus":0.05665402797468274,"score_gpt":0.29052054521320814,"score_spread":0.2338665172385254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769966633","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8914048,0.00459271,0.032471735,0.044330195,0.0002172447,0.000047965932,0.0014410838,0.000118333395,0.025376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99556005,0.0008242768,0.0009098856,0.00080622855,0.00011928355,0.000008544471,0.000125837,0.000017950942,0.0016278872],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982181,0.0010565708,0.00007583201,0.00023994924,0.00017385786,0.00023572663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9725849,0.021101773,0.0036480313,0.001504056,0.0007711607,0.00039005882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060215294,0.00027052354,0.00086340297,0.0006397872,0.00070942024,0.0019041328,0.0008100796,0.0010319198,0.011485162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03613805,0.00026908942,0.000678634,0.0013960514,0.0029594374,0.003007681,0.0021131951,0.0023951866,0.00066694926],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000626381,0.00022373124,0.4652116,0.0005579778,0.00071389735,0.0010268266,0.005698872,0.04782999,0.001066002,0.31704357,0.015017842,0.14498325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008605534,0.00023748206,0.36962682,0.00067871483,0.00045605164,0.00020430748,0.0057986937,0.09524307,0.0010511599,0.50963074,0.016890958,0.00009588172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031190405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014938466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031190405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00109414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001122339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06201768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2779759396","doi":"10.1111/coep.12273","title":"USING ENGEL CURVES TO ESTIMATE CONSUMER PRICE INDEX BIAS FOR THE ELDERLY","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Housing Market and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"Colgate University","keywords":"Economics; Engel curve; Inflation (cosmology); Price index; Index (typography); Consumer price index (South Africa); Relative price; Demographic economics; Econometrics; Monetary economics; Monetary policy","score_opus":0.18557649584669555,"score_gpt":0.3446691831314292,"score_spread":0.15909268728473364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2779759396","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61043656,0.004577082,0.3485452,0.0011563573,0.00038037804,0.00068511674,0.008322807,0.0012122676,0.024684113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9605928,0.0013197912,0.02564532,0.00020244568,0.00011279152,0.00031255028,0.0044589983,0.00017961848,0.0071757864],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754167,0.0012964869,0.00016621198,0.0004093861,0.00041571443,0.00017045501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96946037,0.02128684,0.0044357153,0.003167059,0.0014387041,0.00021127191],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01676383,0.0008980545,0.0010962626,0.004070072,0.00030577075,0.0027799876,0.00105845,0.001451883,0.008446442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.099699244,0.00040892413,0.0022668377,0.003347317,0.0009262247,0.002349034,0.00142445,0.0012728809,0.0029316284],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067905727,0.00019776466,0.48376125,0.0004945383,0.0018879179,0.0005291674,0.0022281036,0.18752328,0.0006726692,0.10157238,0.017228803,0.20322494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014193666,0.00037943653,0.1792193,0.0003494545,0.00051444874,0.00077754963,0.0016278328,0.5952651,0.001308316,0.19339834,0.02683264,0.00018557212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008649246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035900648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01676383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001473127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006458453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08865672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922864063","doi":"10.1111/coep.12427","title":"THE IMPACT OF HIGHLY PUBLICIZED CAMPUS SCANDALS ON COLLEGE OUTCOMES","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Media coverage; Yield (engineering); Construct (python library); Economics; Demographic economics; Political science; Business; Sociology; Media studies","score_opus":0.012753722382362121,"score_gpt":0.24943722088423412,"score_spread":0.236683498501872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922864063","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97193146,0.00081791956,0.00023610803,0.006791308,0.00020066855,0.000041905063,0.003234791,0.000052306255,0.016693603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99643517,0.00021223896,0.000037984257,0.0004399885,0.00014913165,0.000014546619,0.0014710991,0.000010384427,0.0012294998],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99509984,0.0018009692,0.0003384862,0.00042419275,0.0011121903,0.0012242894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91840875,0.015120316,0.04836922,0.002618699,0.0055013676,0.0099816555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052683963,0.00026374578,0.0004638452,0.0022270372,0.0016206322,0.0055925497,0.00055140385,0.0011809669,0.008517446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043259636,0.00018670529,0.00035572573,0.00311121,0.0013418653,0.0017027867,0.002592926,0.002923265,0.0021184324],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003587721,0.00031539955,0.9505065,0.000069665315,0.00009042917,0.00014523766,0.0006715087,0.0008426277,0.00014295963,0.0017910672,0.021190893,0.023874948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015396334,0.00011460952,0.99158585,0.0000678457,0.00001935497,0.000035941874,0.0023486058,0.0008778735,0.000115610026,0.00079301134,0.0039971406,0.000028690934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016358748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027599614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016358748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017418193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017369195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03252703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039260411","doi":"10.1111/coep.12504","title":"ECONOMIC FREEDOM AND THE ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES OF THE 1918 PANDEMIC","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic freedom; Economics; Argument (complex analysis); Index of Economic Freedom; Shock (circulatory); Economic cost; Economic analysis; Economic model; Economic impact analysis; Pandemic; Index (typography); Economic security; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Macroeconomics; Economic growth; Market economy; Microeconomics; Classical economics","score_opus":0.05836905637332717,"score_gpt":0.294747397999758,"score_spread":0.23637834162643084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3039260411","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85499394,0.0022674382,0.0012897167,0.01610071,0.00012834255,0.000020087411,0.00020351185,0.000011656498,0.124984585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99885094,0.00043499153,0.000034903285,0.00015686727,0.00003249886,0.0000016032268,0.000013704635,0.0000011366824,0.00047326306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918824,0.0004185757,0.000027638223,0.000036012952,0.00009416925,0.0002353377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99599683,0.0014618961,0.0017550802,0.00013249398,0.00027805043,0.0003756186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014115362,0.00011341225,0.00016955829,0.00054571184,0.00075648545,0.0018818607,0.0001408064,0.00055144064,0.004530358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069188997,0.00006709621,0.00015325623,0.00075092015,0.0032147372,0.0009599636,0.0014069987,0.0010141612,0.0001921531],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003847317,0.00028140782,0.2348595,0.00018334623,0.00010309134,0.0007852681,0.0021408184,0.02822164,0.0008825278,0.6700643,0.008578453,0.05351488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061905186,0.00020792938,0.64924866,0.00036014555,0.00005534384,0.0004165872,0.0060873786,0.010234483,0.00071214157,0.29896075,0.033584584,0.00007015653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003132515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030772404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004530358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014191645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006856736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015155613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3103496828","doi":"10.1111/coep.12512","title":"DO BETTER INSTITUTIONS BROADEN ACCESS TO SANITATION IN <scp>SUB‐SAHARA</scp> AFRICA?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Economic Growth and Development","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"","keywords":"Sanitation; Language change; Accountability; Universal design; Government (linguistics); Quality (philosophy); Business; Rural area; Improved sanitation; Access to finance; Economic growth; Development economics; Economics; Public economics; Political science; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.10020534186051812,"score_gpt":0.2944375965332676,"score_spread":0.19423225467274952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3103496828","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96414334,0.002432803,0.0008631371,0.012827162,0.000030934116,0.000043136668,0.0004771396,0.000022445352,0.019159969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985281,0.00062812195,0.00013624356,0.00030379195,0.000015565074,0.000008482542,0.000046077217,0.0000025493316,0.00033094134],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988896,0.0004241743,0.00004355742,0.00007883003,0.0000979741,0.0004658183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99120414,0.0016846538,0.0057596145,0.00020631865,0.00039344418,0.0007518422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014243142,0.00015730961,0.00028168768,0.00082016375,0.00060335186,0.002232351,0.00033639994,0.0006534505,0.007437062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007913871,0.00016898564,0.00017551314,0.001512229,0.0020459332,0.0020289624,0.0016992651,0.00062298676,0.00037795902],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040419967,0.00041516055,0.78533655,0.0009387488,0.00029723177,0.0009321544,0.007382726,0.006250717,0.0042402423,0.082299456,0.007871045,0.10363169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006149515,0.000110273075,0.9535881,0.00042312182,0.00007148503,0.00012138138,0.006439995,0.0016753181,0.0008482264,0.016227452,0.020412998,0.000020076513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017001256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029811272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017001256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019772735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021980614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033804655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122030926","doi":"10.1093/cep/byi028","title":"ECONOMICS OF THE “CRITICAL USE” OF METHYL BROMIDE UNDER THE MONTREAL PROTOCOL","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Montreal Protocol; Externality; Willingness to pay; Protocol (science); Economics; Ozone layer; Set (abstract data type); Public economics; Business; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.17475203058035718,"score_gpt":0.31665761685508553,"score_spread":0.14190558627472835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122030926","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58561397,0.0016039219,0.020790992,0.015078534,0.00012725644,0.0013381072,0.0028527833,0.00017982561,0.37241462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823298,0.00047441758,0.0017615644,0.0007295906,0.000055000422,0.00025637296,0.00020809309,0.000013508867,0.01417164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926287,0.0031907584,0.00016000294,0.00034087276,0.0017706295,0.0019090392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9794754,0.011801083,0.0041129454,0.001106119,0.002449076,0.0010553706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0081665,0.0005060488,0.00036158625,0.0009925134,0.001859616,0.003394989,0.0015027055,0.0019898082,0.012294675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029137122,0.0003694836,0.00054945325,0.0011929355,0.0025484615,0.0018022646,0.0017387717,0.0019237284,0.0005187285],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012755387,0.00045032176,0.04585464,0.0002970037,0.00025083154,0.0013689917,0.00095037866,0.09201641,0.0042066374,0.759599,0.036708374,0.05702191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012303297,0.0033946985,0.21412894,0.0005716825,0.0008502319,0.0006835022,0.0057448405,0.23577587,0.012249742,0.3320556,0.19262755,0.00068693265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20418404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20632714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20418404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014515532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010210061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40599114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124906363","doi":"10.1093/cep/19.4.382","title":"CHILDREN AND THE ENVIRONMENT: VALUING INDIRECT EFFECTS ON A CHILD'S LIFE CHANCES","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Early Childhood Education and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive; Public economics; Economics; Indirect effect; Face (sociological concept); Estimation; Cost–benefit analysis; Value (mathematics); Actuarial science; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.014835379576331036,"score_gpt":0.256020028170253,"score_spread":0.24118464859392194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124906363","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89993274,0.004693973,0.014879061,0.009624599,0.000051995612,0.00004236819,0.0003510114,0.000013555797,0.07041061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959371,0.0012681845,0.0018234169,0.00008994108,0.000014585428,0.0000141854625,0.00003947037,0.0000023221796,0.00081077043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772674,0.0016402288,0.00006462654,0.00007805953,0.00035793023,0.00013245124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99280095,0.0055370783,0.0008067946,0.0002586626,0.00029661698,0.00029988706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029810285,0.00044016275,0.00030525055,0.0008993869,0.00047664714,0.0026623101,0.000250649,0.0008642338,0.0033281993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012577431,0.00016224201,0.00033836032,0.0009981685,0.0029727293,0.0030357477,0.0014373091,0.0009780262,0.000108671185],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046854245,0.00027251057,0.3477743,0.00038734605,0.00047285517,0.0009817746,0.01431547,0.032673318,0.00081552035,0.42333004,0.0027173334,0.17579101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038146856,0.0006494329,0.30663005,0.0007521819,0.00041991385,0.0012348354,0.026937693,0.026226597,0.001898944,0.607985,0.027079111,0.0001479972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024020965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0033281993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001923505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000636123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015765369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200289054","doi":"10.1111/coep.12562","title":"COVID‐19 lockdown and traffic accidents: Lessons from the pandemic","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Traffic and Road Safety","field":"Engineering","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Regression discontinuity design; Pandemic; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Poison control; Demographic economics; Geography; Demography; Business; Medical emergency; Medicine; Economics; Statistics; Virology; Mathematics; Outbreak; Sociology","score_opus":0.03987826638102934,"score_gpt":0.2792848510391775,"score_spread":0.23940658465814815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200289054","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92688996,0.003867951,0.004758174,0.050771628,0.0004182053,0.00008658211,0.001957956,0.00006733871,0.011182163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99578756,0.0006152736,0.0004888147,0.0019713046,0.00011785221,0.000023075016,0.00021114016,0.000009392418,0.00077567826],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99597317,0.0030131189,0.000082470535,0.00023551387,0.00021571136,0.00047996786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98053473,0.013795036,0.002424829,0.001184251,0.0011634451,0.00089768786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075521218,0.00021661901,0.0006576342,0.00062670617,0.00058076467,0.0012244058,0.0012656889,0.0018009628,0.005150135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032166034,0.00017727951,0.00079304643,0.0006851719,0.001340768,0.0010256198,0.0010691335,0.0024788338,0.00025491064],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015840755,0.0016422449,0.8175182,0.0002788321,0.00094877306,0.000870207,0.0021060656,0.026272949,0.00042600144,0.0517733,0.025675505,0.07090394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007988964,0.0024898546,0.793359,0.0006298449,0.0009742528,0.00034569605,0.010113834,0.0870588,0.0013981911,0.07284246,0.02974327,0.00024603505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0726737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05300222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0726737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015886759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001926038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14450139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4284691956","doi":"10.1111/coep.12578","title":"The interplay of financial education, financial inclusion and financial stability and the role of Big Tech","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Financial inclusion; Financial literacy; Finance; Financial stability; Business; Financial analysis; Inclusion (mineral); Financial regulation; Accounting management; Indirect finance; Financial services; Financial ratio; Financial system; Economics; Accounting; Accounting information system","score_opus":0.007754329308652457,"score_gpt":0.2230406289334079,"score_spread":0.21528629962475543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4284691956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9338142,0.0009416915,0.000555942,0.013818868,0.00005195099,0.000014296567,0.00004773141,0.0000072276466,0.050748013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99888366,0.00018862248,0.00007362047,0.00019824575,0.000019362209,0.0000026449293,0.0000062731847,8.760907e-7,0.0006267217],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809617,0.0010879305,0.000059673537,0.000082730534,0.00024378109,0.00042967653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986503,0.005725752,0.0035864601,0.00027425078,0.00082607847,0.0030844784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022782432,0.00012901782,0.00015760779,0.0012579879,0.0018826608,0.004400063,0.00032660886,0.0007675308,0.007041906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0095473165,0.00008385727,0.00013699755,0.00086955755,0.004044916,0.0027215001,0.0030713258,0.0010103754,0.00027385846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002548346,0.0016613532,0.6758563,0.00032674105,0.00008821132,0.0007736786,0.027106473,0.0008588173,0.00060773536,0.14687076,0.00572529,0.13986978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029802408,0.0003434919,0.8462741,0.0010648589,0.00006134368,0.00036653623,0.051241662,0.0015024157,0.0006978818,0.06112064,0.03723944,0.00005791851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003112396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006424875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007041906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013773587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016359657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023557484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4292259489","doi":"10.1111/coep.12583","title":"What is the future of water quality trading?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Water resources management and optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Global Water Futures; Canada First Research Excellence Fund","keywords":"Nonpoint source pollution; Quality (philosophy); Key (lock); Water quality; Business; Public economics; Environmental economics; Computer science; Economics; Computer security","score_opus":0.019459250659250533,"score_gpt":0.23093677652250216,"score_spread":0.21147752586325164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4292259489","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031604327,0.90453297,0.001601576,0.08312998,0.0014714067,0.0000056108493,0.0000963912,0.000019870857,0.0059817107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.090631016,0.89326406,0.0013676664,0.010426421,0.0024950183,0.000018579996,0.00007939188,0.000017076194,0.0017008551],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987036,0.0005482768,0.00007593946,0.00016131734,0.0003561627,0.00015458693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99385417,0.003864644,0.00054654566,0.00012923233,0.0012479621,0.00035751984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003939338,0.0002523065,0.00073064544,0.00090163614,0.00051529956,0.0047597582,0.0007355045,0.0022739377,0.0062605417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067777615,0.00015115806,0.0005314337,0.001776105,0.0018517342,0.007675395,0.0008749506,0.00199364,0.0006147086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028595488,0.00010243626,0.0021184036,0.009096311,0.00015857622,0.00020594573,0.00046076943,0.0028913175,0.0009971473,0.14079496,0.052335795,0.7905524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034351662,0.00017771639,0.003463334,0.011449633,0.00013301345,0.00037292807,0.002890614,0.0024261235,0.00090977555,0.22677682,0.7512919,0.00007378939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045099338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041365405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062605417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017801615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005236456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020943582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404001863","doi":"10.1111/coep.12677","title":"The fertility gap and economic freedom","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Fertility; Economic freedom; Demographic economics; Demography; Sociology; Population; Market economy","score_opus":0.0620037918140714,"score_gpt":0.33662184951815816,"score_spread":0.27461805770408676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404001863","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.977391,0.001214313,0.0010020582,0.0028726428,0.000034744346,0.000008042761,0.0012329135,0.000007682093,0.016236557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994567,0.00010333967,0.000053137814,0.000050191884,0.000013899806,0.000003418703,0.00012315421,0.000001064802,0.00019505693],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855465,0.0006842832,0.000071659444,0.00014921131,0.00025424894,0.00028598547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98950607,0.0050342605,0.0035811975,0.00039077815,0.00040171816,0.0010859334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019547457,0.00007289402,0.00023148394,0.0010911978,0.0004922358,0.00066316593,0.0002335421,0.00028133125,0.0052439906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011643612,0.00006185193,0.00023918027,0.0010486055,0.0012053858,0.00059547886,0.0013514914,0.00075007015,0.00019751562],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001566802,0.00011563475,0.93472594,0.00005979119,0.0001168823,0.00009888672,0.0008886761,0.0018551794,0.000163141,0.03998434,0.0016857041,0.02014925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001689924,0.0000868492,0.9647516,0.00008923428,0.000020640144,0.00016277285,0.0019659458,0.0014918598,0.00023463444,0.024482416,0.006679232,0.00001776416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025517985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003065009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052439906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000495728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043772958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017542899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408470316","doi":"10.1111/coep.12691","title":"Employment adjustments to increased imports: Evidence from a developing country","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Developing country; International economics; Monetary economics; Business; International trade; Economic growth","score_opus":0.09502664270125427,"score_gpt":0.28344078357437413,"score_spread":0.18841414087311986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408470316","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951416,0.0004134466,0.000048764003,0.00023785347,0.000007738142,0.0000043408904,0.0007479251,0.0000054037682,0.0033929353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981667,0.00054887304,0.000031272884,0.000055714867,0.000013676765,0.000002303466,0.00063558726,0.000002802122,0.0005430372],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996525,0.00008141148,0.000025369012,0.00006425504,0.000070497714,0.000105856445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970283,0.000676331,0.0014991614,0.00020225636,0.00037439703,0.00021960791],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005865093,0.00019091599,0.00025825057,0.0009900716,0.00041073048,0.0010715006,0.00031560566,0.00031274997,0.0034792987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002040175,0.00016612018,0.00046065418,0.0026475578,0.0006842633,0.0003171288,0.0010602575,0.0007009105,0.00049886195],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063599966,0.00019026612,0.9810721,0.00016230537,0.00023299157,0.00083057757,0.0011258208,0.0018111474,0.0008773865,0.00064379524,0.001066074,0.011351638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006846116,0.000065577675,0.9972263,0.000020414474,0.000044059198,0.00006743194,0.0009687008,0.00012033983,0.00022093032,0.000048239628,0.0012061369,0.0000049054534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033320125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041049875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033320125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007341897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056176644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06625235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417516435","doi":"10.1111/coep.70020","title":"0.001% and counting: Revisiting the price rounding tax","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Bar-Ilan University; Tulane University","keywords":"Rounding; Cash; Revenue; Distribution (mathematics); Consumption (sociology)","score_opus":0.026504471830756788,"score_gpt":0.26537916198933986,"score_spread":0.23887469015858306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417516435","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7137347,0.00096813147,0.036769982,0.021891544,0.0014165929,0.00039961754,0.0027665906,0.00043387877,0.22161895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97935164,0.00028820118,0.008083785,0.001979223,0.00025942843,0.000079916324,0.0006944711,0.000042666205,0.009220665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99374455,0.0022968247,0.00034331935,0.00038072886,0.00255659,0.0006780323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9673744,0.016194407,0.006104255,0.0032225165,0.0063077747,0.0007967404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008466156,0.00028473206,0.0002850178,0.0016957741,0.000946585,0.0029646382,0.0015074852,0.0011043478,0.008417429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056652818,0.00027419967,0.0003698085,0.0019860372,0.0019333591,0.002002258,0.0013534513,0.002573142,0.0012314967],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047226445,0.00047866462,0.2721315,0.0001713729,0.00007486656,0.00030702067,0.0013260194,0.014372591,0.0017701593,0.35173824,0.06723791,0.28991947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016112476,0.00085320027,0.43191293,0.0011775027,0.00021587417,0.00078710716,0.006175804,0.08651541,0.014910415,0.1644396,0.2925231,0.00032799368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036778063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028070383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036778063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024747304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044364496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073127985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}