{"meta":{"query_hash":"73fd71ba02b8","filters":{"venue":"Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice"},"cohort_total":11,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":11,"exported":11,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/73fd71ba02b8","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Contemporary+Readings+in+Law+and+Social+Justice"},"results":[{"id":"W2135574948","doi":"","title":"Emergency Contraception: A Last Chance to Prevent Unintended Pregnancy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Emergency contraception; Ulipristal acetate; Levonorgestrel; Medicine; Unintended pregnancy; Pill; Family planning; Population; Obstetrics; Gynecology; Intrauterine device; Condom; Family medicine; Environmental health; Nursing","score_opus":0.031639947656655204,"score_gpt":0.3163081158341581,"score_spread":0.28466816817750284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135574948","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6405693,0.006776265,0.009233827,0.04026822,0.0028289438,0.0046390765,0.000023337363,0.00032800925,0.295333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934169,0.0001809695,0.00014417773,0.002687404,0.0010435111,0.00011803224,0.000016313292,0.000020560108,0.0023721373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855375,0.00011863867,0.0004002211,0.00044435414,0.00018117164,0.00030185503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993108,0.000042153704,0.00012333522,0.00016125735,0.00017762388,0.00018483026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004390736,0.00016962961,0.00038636412,0.00006817785,0.0002105046,0.000015785148,0.000064456,0.00012983037,0.000034008102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021046308,0.00016569301,0.00005843282,0.0001815522,0.00015647135,0.00018902597,0.00003177177,0.0002312099,0.000026259826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014125579,0.0007662313,0.008342833,0.0024326616,0.000070191236,0.000048482783,0.013393988,0.0000010164493,0.0106600495,0.9142905,0.00931875,0.03926273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012929773,0.0045680604,0.14880101,0.004999976,0.0007504652,0.00014138335,0.012217478,0.0006894939,0.002965749,0.01682618,0.7930776,0.0020328127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008446222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000683757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89746433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006357994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006775504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67567647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W247761429","doi":"","title":"CONSIDERATIONS ON THE ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL CRIME INVESTIGATION PHENOMENON PECULIAR TO EUROPEAN JUDICIAL SCOPE","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice","topic":"Russia and Soviet political economy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Money laundering; Phenomenon; Business; Financial crisis; Language change; Economics; Finance; Economic policy","score_opus":0.05821513339021662,"score_gpt":0.29721792034569516,"score_spread":0.23900278695547855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W247761429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2969696,0.0001276625,0.000014730198,0.011020191,0.00039184268,0.00033277733,0.00001230436,0.000028808934,0.6911021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9801429,0.00002308201,0.000043440443,0.018002661,0.0015065114,0.000018536964,0.0000037015332,0.000011538332,0.00024761033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872285,0.00040106318,0.00025490552,0.0002012803,0.00009209713,0.00032780037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991151,0.0005050859,0.000069413654,0.00006786056,0.000023443294,0.00021905775],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012463506,0.00011977663,0.00018933845,0.000043224085,0.001337961,0.00017746643,0.0000864648,0.00008365263,0.000050134266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035051603,0.00010949444,0.000028078246,0.000059560523,0.0008881886,0.00042446188,0.00004914761,0.0001697619,0.00007227979],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011396764,0.000011730662,0.00041150438,0.000009732328,0.000003877475,0.0000018443262,0.032788556,2.9999578e-7,0.000016613181,0.96174777,0.004884115,0.000112571586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014497571,0.00026555752,0.030341022,0.00017440639,0.00015716029,0.0000043160926,0.04228058,0.000038650323,0.00017021444,0.16057736,0.76344746,0.0010935332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012986411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031565817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8011704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011968143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002450744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W277852187","doi":"","title":"THE RIGHT TO SELF IMAGE: THE CONSENT GIVEN TO CREATE OR USE A PERSON’S IMAGE IN THE NEW CIVIL CODE. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honor; Law; Civil code; Autonomy; Personality; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Political science; Computer science; Internet privacy","score_opus":0.06233342906219248,"score_gpt":0.326990064573646,"score_spread":0.2646566355114535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W277852187","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10276728,0.001616492,0.00016599539,0.46691832,0.0015520536,0.0035066702,0.00015041532,0.00017461086,0.42314816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96092796,0.0001842383,0.00058547826,0.027495433,0.0013065519,0.00010187348,0.000005077605,0.00001533312,0.009378042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779546,0.0008215901,0.00026928892,0.00024171342,0.00035018267,0.0005217683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972373,0.0021803125,0.000093090326,0.00016989639,0.00012907115,0.000190288],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019770772,0.00018254649,0.00022655155,0.00001070791,0.0035611163,0.000873358,0.0003586393,0.00015944203,0.000061523584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00081964297,0.000095744355,0.000088034336,0.00033845982,0.0009588203,0.0006057653,0.00007984376,0.00036411252,0.000023873687],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032819415,0.000030906598,0.00018181247,0.000008768279,0.000015908634,0.000011988445,0.33247665,2.3372296e-7,0.00008328716,0.39593998,0.27120042,0.00001723098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003767127,0.000030222876,0.00064961513,0.000029475148,0.00007416419,0.0000069164157,0.1741188,0.0000057788056,0.000025707674,0.0020153187,0.822473,0.00019429093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064575826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035038758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8581607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012984102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004413487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W288076250","doi":"","title":"Romania in 2020 in Today's International Relations Context","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice","topic":"Russia and Soviet political economy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Recession; Population; Context (archaeology); Politics; Financial crisis; Political science; Development economics; Romanian; Communism; Economic growth; Economics; Sociology; Geography; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.020984438300252605,"score_gpt":0.2878147986702482,"score_spread":0.2668303603699956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W288076250","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2287194,0.00012254469,0.000012647247,0.015161052,0.00032002904,0.0002780037,0.000004707109,0.000021079013,0.75536054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99299043,0.000030045694,0.00003829572,0.0028539926,0.00029489584,0.00005309713,0.00000938542,0.000008255056,0.003721576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987724,0.00017191793,0.00038799655,0.00023383477,0.00013793887,0.00029593558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937046,0.0003682953,0.00007091907,0.00005230876,0.000042993182,0.00009504396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005230074,0.0001029962,0.00023422713,0.0000876364,0.00022048061,0.00013202237,0.00018235162,0.00018837587,0.00041632284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021573389,0.00011455153,0.000037005553,0.00017981818,0.00051738904,0.0008594137,0.00004657213,0.00027001684,0.00010205756],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000089726,0.000045423774,0.026041325,0.000010792156,0.0000043532273,0.000016934398,0.018256217,2.8338627e-7,0.0000059590075,0.95216686,0.002949328,0.00049355975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031332427,0.000060026177,0.13412417,0.00021865289,0.000024774956,0.00000253275,0.13561104,0.0007208363,0.000005903153,0.17656228,0.54879993,0.00073659205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02027252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010775723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7756046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018395242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016146037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9862516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W295295386","doi":"","title":"Sexual Freedom in French Legislation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human sexuality; Sociology; Emancipation; Gender studies; Dignity; Politics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.040518122843167866,"score_gpt":0.3053873912157632,"score_spread":0.26486926837259533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W295295386","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23835471,0.002121048,0.000039663646,0.0022161577,0.000974578,0.0002921635,0.000010575216,0.00007056061,0.7559205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950055,0.00007246382,0.00010066456,0.0011184734,0.0013398355,0.000015014489,0.000013680198,0.0000088676725,0.0023254997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987768,0.00021203725,0.00022447505,0.00017885963,0.00023376715,0.00037407826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955827,0.00017049685,0.0000822233,0.00005567458,0.000042778276,0.00009058424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011465141,0.00011182588,0.00019640842,0.000013915962,0.0006132328,0.00007244594,0.00013118329,0.0003110437,0.00003209373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009436201,0.00011520564,0.00003390692,0.0002538604,0.0006938009,0.00095773145,0.00003787881,0.00028158244,0.000009428466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007929636,0.00006145976,0.02442578,0.000030036092,0.0000056160775,0.000003162441,0.18541142,4.2422093e-7,0.000055342003,0.78349936,0.006259274,0.00024022226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010566732,0.000034089244,0.014518762,0.000055806944,0.000045648478,0.0000013163123,0.1745124,0.000030032335,0.000012158005,0.0060632736,0.8032217,0.00044811913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065732645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003491572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79696244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010331535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000085698965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99368536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W339068569","doi":"","title":"A CORPUS-BASED ANALYSIS OF DEONTIC AND EPISTEMIC VALUES OF THE MODAL SHALL IN LEGAL TEXTS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deontic logic; Linguistics; Meaning (existential); Modal verb; Sentence; Pragmatics; Obligation; Epistemic modality; Verb; Computer science; Modal; Natural language processing; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02005083112389101,"score_gpt":0.30308184728987475,"score_spread":0.28303101616598375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W339068569","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9439054,0.0016463143,0.00004492846,0.00039599888,0.00011413431,0.00015900788,0.000015384014,0.000007058482,0.05371174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99935806,0.000018485256,0.000028382598,0.0003759292,0.000057147703,0.0000046793343,0.0000047088615,0.000004438827,0.00014818685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990137,0.000259252,0.00027933592,0.0001132144,0.00017768453,0.00015680761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993994,0.00027626276,0.00017241955,0.000060498805,0.000053698728,0.000037725487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079720735,0.00007384107,0.00028054637,0.00010484656,0.00013271636,0.000023378698,0.000110691806,0.000100658144,0.000006760006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001689434,0.00006122216,0.00006984198,0.00042012127,0.00061142596,0.00037989317,0.000028378232,0.00010582224,1.8202611e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010247404,0.00010811932,0.28775924,0.00018400427,0.000086417014,0.0000030251172,0.15908909,0.000005934248,0.0009666538,0.55108434,0.00003711076,0.00057361857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0055761696,0.00041444748,0.82128793,0.0014321284,0.0052955346,0.0000035129603,0.1259879,0.009812795,0.0038817145,0.008273647,0.016518392,0.0015158193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013500519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049601113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5428107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000431824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000093017465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9930687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W625080064","doi":"","title":"Romanian Legal Regulations on Workers from Non-Eu Borders","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Residence; Work (physics); Member state; Accession; Member states; Romanian; Free movement; European union; Business; Citizenship; Right to work; State (computer science); Political science; Eu countries; Law; Economic policy; Demographic economics; International trade; Economics","score_opus":0.03619066697603538,"score_gpt":0.31895648829965295,"score_spread":0.28276582132361755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W625080064","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10320222,0.00024319395,0.000027508255,0.003781517,0.000708985,0.00013028734,0.000018707246,0.000043833203,0.89184374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910485,0.000039646726,0.00009217465,0.0031888792,0.0011403866,0.0000067646156,0.000016617452,0.000013077871,0.0044539575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901485,0.00012797667,0.0001885993,0.0001760755,0.00023374888,0.0002587213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994543,0.00026495787,0.00008210867,0.000057108256,0.000050542294,0.00009098348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004106418,0.00011202637,0.00016369694,0.000041811763,0.0009300104,0.00009228996,0.0001346727,0.00008334633,0.00003504484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009738842,0.000116014526,0.00004655794,0.000113776245,0.00057024887,0.000714802,0.000040703653,0.00015855013,0.00003642383],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003498892,0.00004770737,0.0054359483,0.000006343585,0.000023894834,0.000004619232,0.019883687,3.7227474e-7,0.00001682497,0.963752,0.01062456,0.00016909752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037328913,0.000025547562,0.020355305,0.00005955114,0.000033273423,1.7772184e-7,0.026007082,0.000010135341,0.000008659569,0.0011675797,0.95176756,0.00019186483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00837562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014188375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9625844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008021087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057403373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W845611604","doi":"","title":"DRAFTING THE CONTRACT FOR THE CARRIAGE OF GOODS","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil code; Freedom of contract; Law; Meaning (existential); Object (grammar); Law and economics; Business; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04354524271263027,"score_gpt":0.2709743429480322,"score_spread":0.22742910023540192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W845611604","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045119904,0.0007849805,0.011691125,0.014619361,0.0026282324,0.0010990357,0.000036557354,0.00008696331,0.92393386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908654,0.000008169224,0.000028220995,0.006665879,0.002196567,0.000019916384,0.0000104797855,0.000012592937,0.0001927659],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993067,0.000018601591,0.00026749854,0.00013646453,0.00012656442,0.000144198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985393,0.0010566264,0.00022162804,0.00007967337,0.00009733124,0.000005425178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009006918,0.00009817354,0.0001817393,0.000025045212,0.00040876534,0.00014418548,0.00023311762,0.000060282244,0.0000069312746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042546663,0.00006313412,0.00006585929,0.00006746163,0.0005010173,0.00034525985,0.00005795416,0.00011241656,0.0000018118718],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004160148,0.000017148323,0.00157626,0.0001678939,0.000022841026,6.102961e-7,0.0006504908,0.0000027618946,0.000079909405,0.9952407,0.0016605713,0.00053922436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017803867,0.000034474964,0.0066668903,0.00011116663,0.00031504763,0.0000012862516,0.0043671066,0.013258752,0.00008765315,0.041476436,0.9316017,0.00029908118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00093124603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010858786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95376426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010271676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013881429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31439337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W854993281","doi":"","title":"Fiducia in the New Romanian Civil Code","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Civil code; Beneficiary; Law; Romanian; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Commercial law; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Duty","score_opus":0.03976938050743144,"score_gpt":0.3157958408618545,"score_spread":0.2760264603544231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W854993281","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0384257,0.00016252155,0.00021510434,0.024502259,0.00014665474,0.00029450448,0.000006698779,0.000038978815,0.9362076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992659,0.000027685535,0.000047133202,0.0052377502,0.00065286685,0.000016248303,0.0000047297226,0.0000072165853,0.0013473829],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899393,0.00021962613,0.00019299854,0.00019291035,0.00017864739,0.00022190217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941224,0.0003397614,0.00006777498,0.000095953335,0.00002256914,0.000061706334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011619305,0.000084189254,0.00014801108,0.000027496471,0.000673501,0.00013812314,0.00029271905,0.000107384636,0.000014471454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010673678,0.0000721723,0.00003151131,0.00021813318,0.0003585938,0.00018576682,0.00003920354,0.0002036509,0.000012351314],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055877163,0.000019515148,0.00069147436,0.000012397803,0.0000017773393,0.0000022273684,0.042213447,2.1736912e-7,0.000016794746,0.9497632,0.006742196,0.0005311571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030521426,0.000014711583,0.0020324516,0.000019517112,0.000013714871,4.3467202e-7,0.0142063135,0.000034002383,0.0000041245535,0.024485396,0.9587675,0.00011662169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011009298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032568593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9542333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003990205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001317397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W881206321","doi":"","title":"THE PERCEPTION OF CORRUPTION IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenon; Language change; Abuse of power; Social phenomenon; Democracy; Politics; Public opinion; State (computer science); Power (physics); Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Public relations; Social science","score_opus":0.048705580890745365,"score_gpt":0.3094090897419048,"score_spread":0.26070350885115945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W881206321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5292946,0.000037496633,0.0002305206,0.0066641457,0.0005091138,0.00021497296,0.0000015040358,0.000021724936,0.46302593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986786,0.00009275541,0.000027181386,0.00040954648,0.00013695795,0.000011787503,0.0000066191265,0.0000034788168,0.0006330752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919075,0.00017998907,0.0002662533,0.00011995008,0.00010514971,0.00013789226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957484,0.00019649042,0.00011003157,0.000040437408,0.00004353871,0.000034661767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017393188,0.000053686745,0.000112592104,0.000042690004,0.00042556194,0.000079488214,0.000086654196,0.00008700428,0.00001591159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001567533,0.00005088333,0.00002030099,0.00010369332,0.00037036042,0.00027860692,0.000018282779,0.00008778345,0.000005402184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002791565,0.000021086102,0.0067957453,0.00001574456,0.0000015495367,3.1858252e-7,0.01250573,9.195072e-8,0.000043828084,0.95915586,0.000088122506,0.02134399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001240108,0.00010631711,0.09819092,0.000072408126,0.000016859985,0.0000012468425,0.13995652,0.0005163559,0.000007613442,0.011508521,0.7480579,0.00032522058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004908565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004457293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94764733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010548805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001373453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32731214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W917612225","doi":"","title":"Communication and Culture: Cultural Paradigms and Referentials","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice","topic":"Diverse academic and cultural studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Etymology; Sociology; German; Element (criminal law); Relation (database); Epistemology; Linguistics; Vocabulary; Aesthetics; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.060626348813090765,"score_gpt":0.25848862046003285,"score_spread":0.1978622716469421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W917612225","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3905028,0.04791566,0.00010686755,0.003417861,0.00021696967,0.00027489808,0.000055166987,0.00005601868,0.55745375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99178493,0.0056235557,0.000093758346,0.0012508824,0.000085201165,0.000008681902,0.000019066476,0.000006005055,0.0011279217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932104,0.000030470717,0.00027063032,0.00022609069,0.00002272499,0.00012901382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996748,0.00005440761,0.00015093965,0.0000581746,0.000019059233,0.00004261605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031810318,0.000113635804,0.0003038326,0.000022141503,0.00036968733,0.00009446342,0.000082623505,0.00012637555,0.0000066940806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005423223,0.00010548668,0.000021618038,0.000050898296,0.0003774389,0.0003939806,0.000103313425,0.00015674521,0.000008174813],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011676696,0.000009033922,0.00535135,0.00005192365,0.000019070048,3.9800065e-7,0.00778114,2.9973794e-8,0.000015847123,0.9822952,0.0037303977,0.0007339464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096659025,0.000046994934,0.006459704,0.000047223035,0.0000341473,0.0000041230755,0.0060939607,0.00007609795,0.000015126323,0.072942086,0.91300786,0.000306063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003288149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015349086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9093531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016595324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000021086996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4301622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}