{"meta":{"query_hash":"73fd71ba02b8","filters":{"venue":"Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice"},"cohort_total":11,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":11,"exported":11,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/73fd71ba02b8","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Contemporary+Readings+in+Law+and+Social+Justice"},"results":[{"id":"W2135574948","doi":"","title":"Emergency Contraception: A Last Chance to Prevent Unintended Pregnancy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Emergency contraception; Ulipristal acetate; Levonorgestrel; Medicine; Unintended pregnancy; Pill; Family planning; Population; Obstetrics; Gynecology; Intrauterine device; Condom; Family medicine; Environmental health; Nursing","score_opus":0.031639947656655204,"score_gpt":0.3163081158341581,"score_spread":0.28466816817750284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135574948","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0096579585,0.5074038,0.00560385,0.22873734,0.019341396,0.00024244025,0.0011933658,0.00090573914,0.2269141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18221936,0.49148977,0.016808076,0.12485506,0.030340808,0.00047249786,0.0017174769,0.00022551665,0.1518714],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849284,0.0006154677,0.00008922425,0.00010196573,0.00055662246,0.0001438208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976311,0.00050996995,0.0005270421,0.00011412681,0.00056703115,0.00065069273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013966564,0.00040737385,0.00048262635,0.0009406844,0.00093126675,0.0017040304,0.0006761279,0.0022709365,0.031779986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044689314,0.00018342814,0.00039338876,0.00052303035,0.0008448513,0.0014793834,0.0014433827,0.0026725966,0.0071029663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017599794,0.00021999367,0.004798335,0.0022211855,0.00006591041,0.0007577627,0.000276044,0.000105543135,0.00064786884,0.014663248,0.340594,0.6354741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006829409,0.0003170615,0.0061212997,0.0037971947,0.00006180793,0.0051103197,0.0003167943,0.000118923585,0.0005529458,0.0044834595,0.97902566,0.000026331398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020838035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033413472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031779986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000853948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025913257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1063146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W247761429","doi":"","title":"CONSIDERATIONS ON THE ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL CRIME INVESTIGATION PHENOMENON PECULIAR TO EUROPEAN JUDICIAL SCOPE","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice","topic":"Russia and Soviet political economy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Money laundering; Phenomenon; Business; Financial crisis; Language change; Economics; Finance; Economic policy","score_opus":0.05821513339021662,"score_gpt":0.29721792034569516,"score_spread":0.23900278695547855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W247761429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8652159,0.005579353,0.009378179,0.008654217,0.00025797533,0.0003044833,0.0002494871,0.00003182292,0.11032863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931162,0.00084944745,0.0014831597,0.0007610626,0.00008399706,0.000068097535,0.000059006397,0.000010703305,0.0035683948],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9852047,0.006882721,0.0009853723,0.0012806664,0.0042136917,0.0014328279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.959776,0.020041984,0.008956214,0.002560048,0.007114731,0.0015510456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016414514,0.000203125,0.00028042798,0.0044579855,0.0036405588,0.006527464,0.0011988186,0.0015156852,0.0041461415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049374484,0.0002057224,0.00039815408,0.0028494734,0.0041140225,0.0028740363,0.0036158073,0.0016526994,0.00032829022],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020429773,0.00024036941,0.43257302,0.0006410324,0.000108306354,0.005014322,0.056590404,0.0007495862,0.0016056692,0.30179748,0.013165039,0.18731047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021151767,0.00026940173,0.75437915,0.0019658576,0.00017880528,0.008870326,0.079140544,0.0028082025,0.003611881,0.032295007,0.11634067,0.000118941185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004836749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007199712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016414514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026057966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036974628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08680928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W277852187","doi":"","title":"THE RIGHT TO SELF IMAGE: THE CONSENT GIVEN TO CREATE OR USE A PERSON’S IMAGE IN THE NEW CIVIL CODE. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honor; Law; Civil code; Autonomy; Personality; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Political science; Computer science; Internet privacy","score_opus":0.06233342906219248,"score_gpt":0.326990064573646,"score_spread":0.2646566355114535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W277852187","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016226467,0.0072708116,0.01167958,0.09428455,0.002137998,0.00050380995,0.00053636264,0.00012816773,0.8672322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6463812,0.0073024523,0.010828326,0.067348965,0.0038949049,0.0013223393,0.00069607794,0.0002281887,0.26199758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9841361,0.0063264146,0.0011745391,0.0017432618,0.0046139867,0.0020055962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99012226,0.004973078,0.000751235,0.0015947622,0.0018882273,0.0006703006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011849994,0.00062219106,0.000552639,0.0010395462,0.0058194464,0.0074650412,0.0015695601,0.014768365,0.015687715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028633367,0.00053384976,0.0006450837,0.00090035406,0.01845247,0.006246614,0.004674848,0.0107211545,0.0036571021],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025362238,0.000038218488,0.00052385975,0.000070643684,0.0000044584954,0.00032019377,0.0044073933,0.0001583833,0.00031790163,0.94702893,0.034092076,0.013012535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038228205,0.000100128906,0.0026825175,0.0012047706,0.000024374245,0.0015205115,0.0034089084,0.0004957395,0.0008365566,0.28971198,0.6998704,0.00010587466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029703962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027476368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029703962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055769044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011292822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062669516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W288076250","doi":"","title":"Romania in 2020 in Today's International Relations Context","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice","topic":"Russia and Soviet political economy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Recession; Population; Context (archaeology); Politics; Financial crisis; Political science; Development economics; Romanian; Communism; Economic growth; Economics; Sociology; Geography; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.020984438300252605,"score_gpt":0.2878147986702482,"score_spread":0.2668303603699956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W288076250","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4558923,0.04323252,0.0011455731,0.031689487,0.0018351951,0.00007173638,0.001575946,0.00005188551,0.46450529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9749485,0.00875337,0.000717694,0.0018450374,0.00015544277,0.000030542105,0.00040325153,0.000017712338,0.01312847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907815,0.00038426218,0.000060582923,0.00007561601,0.00010930863,0.00029200662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997516,0.000035349593,0.00007444778,0.000016744722,0.000047612873,0.00007415923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012899861,0.0002370458,0.0002418078,0.0007886938,0.0020436973,0.0036234737,0.0002982003,0.00065782573,0.005588369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009070094,0.00011904492,0.00023795634,0.001733396,0.0015632563,0.0017384001,0.0016523863,0.0013463488,0.0008689956],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001306266,0.00013757791,0.06516006,0.0009042336,0.00006662332,0.003749689,0.023894915,0.0015744072,0.0012905707,0.72089225,0.06342728,0.118771724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001124597,0.00008126751,0.13334131,0.0011154283,0.000016344777,0.0016794316,0.031415213,0.00051497185,0.00037290406,0.011964374,0.81945235,0.000035163892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059542013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006971007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059542013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002839693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002533589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020603538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W295295386","doi":"","title":"Sexual Freedom in French Legislation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human sexuality; Sociology; Emancipation; Gender studies; Dignity; Politics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.040518122843167866,"score_gpt":0.3053873912157632,"score_spread":0.26486926837259533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W295295386","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051689982,0.044444665,0.0025408233,0.06738036,0.0019132565,0.00011068332,0.000655206,0.00015724509,0.8311078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72253305,0.008464975,0.0016875361,0.02055283,0.0012477613,0.00018677968,0.0003583505,0.00008427543,0.24488433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951814,0.0015869582,0.00023092207,0.00066965766,0.0010418628,0.0012892488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99789894,0.0012862306,0.0001713847,0.00015141806,0.00037220484,0.00011981604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042436337,0.00049289246,0.00058678916,0.0020878848,0.008519922,0.0072272704,0.0006756622,0.00592473,0.017457316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004900009,0.00034317648,0.0009457772,0.0017546021,0.007974588,0.0021035653,0.002493324,0.005698494,0.0013662142],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014981142,0.000020265385,0.00046254412,0.00006729518,0.000007981352,0.00021601841,0.002797673,0.00016662962,0.00017139547,0.9708953,0.0145898955,0.010590037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000201545,0.000035486995,0.0039366498,0.00025425068,0.00001564854,0.00026504838,0.001074874,0.00027242437,0.00034461057,0.035442106,0.95830446,0.000034259578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2071814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.087531865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2071814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023812383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011827079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41195095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W339068569","doi":"","title":"A CORPUS-BASED ANALYSIS OF DEONTIC AND EPISTEMIC VALUES OF THE MODAL SHALL IN LEGAL TEXTS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deontic logic; Linguistics; Meaning (existential); Modal verb; Sentence; Pragmatics; Obligation; Epistemic modality; Verb; Computer science; Modal; Natural language processing; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02005083112389101,"score_gpt":0.30308184728987475,"score_spread":0.28303101616598375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W339068569","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9367717,0.0017713719,0.019131633,0.0010311158,0.00009821504,0.0005447545,0.009900509,0.00010367078,0.03064709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96702087,0.00066460745,0.01982483,0.00009313965,0.000038605296,0.0007187655,0.008794367,0.00007176671,0.0027729992],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.996956,0.0018192476,0.00023471053,0.00034476764,0.00058731186,0.000057895984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9720558,0.02200234,0.0015479318,0.0011599335,0.0030154749,0.00021853673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003667146,0.00016800046,0.00025006037,0.007349534,0.0019333453,0.0021402927,0.0005157079,0.0005508478,0.0044176276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01563738,0.00020316898,0.00019386181,0.009904066,0.0019110154,0.002152701,0.001697333,0.0008080516,0.00042964832],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011044665,0.00094447593,0.10569598,0.0065696794,0.00021965294,0.0032679883,0.31667206,0.004787773,0.03303349,0.1265757,0.038928118,0.36220062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018819852,0.0004210202,0.37244788,0.0023033125,0.00025497304,0.0020629845,0.21514334,0.021692295,0.021323703,0.026173914,0.33777678,0.0002114841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004997355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009105812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007349534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017593816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011043272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01939398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W625080064","doi":"","title":"Romanian Legal Regulations on Workers from Non-Eu Borders","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Residence; Work (physics); Member state; Accession; Member states; Romanian; Free movement; European union; Business; Citizenship; Right to work; State (computer science); Political science; Eu countries; Law; Economic policy; Demographic economics; International trade; Economics","score_opus":0.03619066697603538,"score_gpt":0.31895648829965295,"score_spread":0.28276582132361755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W625080064","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1823897,0.0070326827,0.010535416,0.0064668963,0.0009444855,0.0010979873,0.002464439,0.0003751118,0.7886932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71305436,0.003992924,0.020362815,0.008189261,0.00044849166,0.0025162362,0.0027986257,0.00017686679,0.24846041],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884448,0.0034690325,0.0020663124,0.0014360534,0.0026663444,0.001917467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915119,0.0025318367,0.0015257559,0.0019273977,0.002103852,0.00039928625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0090921745,0.00038774312,0.0003676004,0.0012132637,0.0027122214,0.0031056583,0.0014148019,0.0029527675,0.014564329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010483798,0.0005002798,0.0006153176,0.0011395133,0.002454119,0.0011864862,0.0027695652,0.0023455,0.004700493],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044032978,0.00039744494,0.04429272,0.001798257,0.00006806475,0.0036498425,0.023362467,0.0014592675,0.01471163,0.6088336,0.14781924,0.15316714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006331788,0.00016169818,0.07407514,0.0015217363,0.000038689865,0.0015613302,0.0038249874,0.00044548817,0.0030000177,0.0070309397,0.9081865,0.00009013267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009580718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011061743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014564329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018153258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006845188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048722565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W845611604","doi":"","title":"DRAFTING THE CONTRACT FOR THE CARRIAGE OF GOODS","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil code; Freedom of contract; Law; Meaning (existential); Object (grammar); Law and economics; Business; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04354524271263027,"score_gpt":0.2709743429480322,"score_spread":0.22742910023540192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W845611604","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043421686,0.0014387385,0.5171629,0.016200941,0.0033279706,0.0052345614,0.0014946025,0.0010972905,0.41062132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2750326,0.0014061086,0.43346882,0.002015173,0.0013635589,0.0018121093,0.0021084398,0.0005293492,0.28226388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98436457,0.0041851327,0.001418781,0.0014737786,0.007289179,0.001268617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9862277,0.0043932437,0.0008026048,0.0025684603,0.0050453595,0.00096255966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018997453,0.00058412354,0.0005108015,0.0019603,0.0035812417,0.0063787363,0.0018317123,0.0061544734,0.030394752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031183062,0.00058270834,0.001208632,0.0014502889,0.0040640016,0.0051276344,0.0045253844,0.0045955824,0.0077037825],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044651057,0.0000739983,0.0005298499,0.00015693372,0.000012768621,0.00052449247,0.0024769432,0.002023,0.0026873609,0.93078834,0.023558736,0.037122983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000700639,0.00020174276,0.0016742082,0.00062039006,0.00004931088,0.0005450791,0.0012838081,0.009449261,0.005394956,0.12906583,0.85149425,0.00015109734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017754976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009552449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030394752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045004557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019852864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10168064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W854993281","doi":"","title":"Fiducia in the New Romanian Civil Code","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Civil code; Beneficiary; Law; Romanian; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Commercial law; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Duty","score_opus":0.03976938050743144,"score_gpt":0.3157958408618545,"score_spread":0.2760264603544231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W854993281","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02063863,0.013062581,0.041180316,0.008243851,0.0019293254,0.00015613763,0.00073022366,0.00009497939,0.913964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7392849,0.012253371,0.04413483,0.0035900418,0.0024404076,0.0006517868,0.0012745908,0.00016768013,0.19620247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99630094,0.0013932176,0.00029257868,0.00069875584,0.000882323,0.000432193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99798214,0.0007763146,0.0002538612,0.000258653,0.0006147788,0.00011415369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023586112,0.0003455507,0.00043024714,0.002110507,0.00434878,0.0051685055,0.00063006656,0.0018197786,0.00882971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044616903,0.00028296758,0.00054099713,0.0021896148,0.00762293,0.0033654307,0.0021346249,0.004180995,0.002827763],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031816805,0.0000030820088,0.00006614243,0.000023337565,7.775286e-7,0.000046069115,0.0003484584,0.00010900187,0.000029755776,0.9916911,0.0034639006,0.0042151487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005311583,0.000024852961,0.0010809745,0.0002705159,0.0000040912955,0.00034093254,0.00035699297,0.0009207168,0.00015712439,0.29344895,0.70335966,0.000029814968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0149403615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009233414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0149403615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008418596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003105989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06108141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W881206321","doi":"","title":"THE PERCEPTION OF CORRUPTION IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenon; Language change; Abuse of power; Social phenomenon; Democracy; Politics; Public opinion; State (computer science); Power (physics); Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Public relations; Social science","score_opus":0.048705580890745365,"score_gpt":0.3094090897419048,"score_spread":0.26070350885115945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W881206321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9659671,0.0008404581,0.00027753375,0.010096896,0.00009955148,0.000026430642,0.000038615854,0.0000071302966,0.022646321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990264,0.00015684725,0.000014808004,0.0002450631,0.000021119222,0.0000048341435,0.000006249561,0.0000018635736,0.0005228342],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910024,0.0058777938,0.00029357633,0.00023810752,0.0013788975,0.0012092404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98238957,0.005201771,0.0072541484,0.00038884536,0.0020364455,0.002729207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005218318,0.00019179836,0.00029073877,0.0015219367,0.003490181,0.005576294,0.00044780623,0.0010375106,0.0058493754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015944235,0.00017597967,0.0003256146,0.0012457478,0.005770986,0.0026107733,0.0026128092,0.0024670148,0.00053540606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026736845,0.0004713601,0.46220666,0.00033064387,0.00007690256,0.0013877945,0.46062317,0.00035178167,0.00096121465,0.03538714,0.009704661,0.028231269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001749349,0.0002063803,0.27207345,0.0006013881,0.000030942625,0.0010263318,0.68938094,0.0009113814,0.00040268808,0.005408693,0.029872298,0.00006806822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063738995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004110841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063738995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004818683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002568049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034962118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W917612225","doi":"","title":"Communication and Culture: Cultural Paradigms and Referentials","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice","topic":"Diverse academic and cultural studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Etymology; Sociology; German; Element (criminal law); Relation (database); Epistemology; Linguistics; Vocabulary; Aesthetics; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.060626348813090765,"score_gpt":0.25848862046003285,"score_spread":0.1978622716469421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W917612225","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049451753,0.08750271,0.044899195,0.086976975,0.0033218174,0.00016991646,0.00022124687,0.000144961,0.7273114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94623137,0.024780184,0.009128561,0.0048152492,0.0018808339,0.00029123883,0.000092928436,0.00009681495,0.012682899],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9827171,0.012663204,0.0006769839,0.001098628,0.0023409387,0.00050299586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849967,0.009791028,0.0015498882,0.0013215153,0.0017673713,0.0005735459],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010129201,0.00074318744,0.000664713,0.0046198973,0.006747683,0.021895548,0.0013723536,0.003728681,0.004460763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010452245,0.00032008276,0.0003706319,0.0065133814,0.054761704,0.017616887,0.0077098575,0.0048967735,0.0007433206],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008951207,0.000011403134,0.00028627136,0.0001340402,0.000007395476,0.0001148576,0.028904183,0.00008412647,0.00009189457,0.9577294,0.0016392975,0.010988167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013585965,0.000034297853,0.0011193911,0.001163968,0.000013874179,0.0004539801,0.037884492,0.00041694747,0.00022836216,0.80152434,0.1571083,0.000038405724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026001267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011177171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021895548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057578464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042630453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05356896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}