{"meta":{"query_hash":"193292bc3ae9","filters":{"venue":"Critical Analysis of Law"},"cohort_total":14,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"exported":14,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/193292bc3ae9","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Critical+Analysis+of+Law"},"results":[{"id":"W1863631935","doi":"10.33137/cal.v2i1.22512","title":"New Historical Jurisprudence: Legal History as Critical Analysis of Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Analysis of Law","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legal history; Jurisprudence; Law; Philosophy of law; Comparative law; Public law; Civil law (Civil law); Common law; Empirical legal studies; Private law; Legal realism; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.06176028810172116,"score_gpt":0.3814619539286307,"score_spread":0.3197016658269095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1863631935","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004531939,0.0024367485,0.0113435015,0.009947078,0.00063337793,0.00007526849,0.000092709044,0.0000692428,0.97087014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99162495,0.000017969895,0.0022856446,0.0015193549,0.000276611,0.0000036948513,0.000022860902,0.000008415287,0.0042405133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964521,0.00037895568,0.0007639091,0.00041166804,0.0014636988,0.00052967086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99541885,0.0018939404,0.00011674644,0.00042202827,0.0010486963,0.0010997213],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008141129,0.00018982441,0.0011453159,0.00045605193,0.00022772324,0.00003719301,0.00051774614,0.00020940306,0.0024280378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034151014,0.00019008156,0.0009941516,0.0017511335,0.005894404,0.00034822043,0.0000838877,0.00022860325,0.000032581585],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002718759,0.00020815726,0.00057741866,0.000010995559,0.0015027592,0.000025487363,0.0006954585,0.00009542981,0.00002602886,0.99125725,0.005524211,0.000049624796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012559979,0.00011246399,0.0001663011,0.000011406069,0.01903785,0.0000011249944,0.00050739344,0.00032266654,0.000039706767,0.01184762,0.96754575,0.0002821476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15742351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008868838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.987093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012630529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002537702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2210278999","doi":"10.33137/cal.v2i2.25699","title":"Judgment, Communication, and Coercion: What’s Wrong with Private Prisons?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Analysis of Law","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Coercion (linguistics); Punishment (psychology); State (computer science); Law and economics; Government (linguistics); Law; Core (optical fiber); sort; Political science; Criminal law; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.12630924989072428,"score_gpt":0.39373662127246634,"score_spread":0.26742737138174205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2210278999","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19234942,0.0055735,0.0048339465,0.33454275,0.00017794866,0.00037813804,0.000031501346,0.00017378041,0.46193904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99708414,0.00019865343,0.0013314108,0.0012698496,0.00003845271,0.0000045413817,0.0000066103103,0.000003982759,0.00006232872],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987336,0.00027922078,0.00020562048,0.00015174638,0.00040289905,0.00022691296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998319,0.00067012466,0.000035056633,0.0002848483,0.00033005854,0.00036096483],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009179835,0.000071860166,0.0002603368,0.000062869425,0.00030245882,0.00013515336,0.00021997148,0.00009309625,0.000047733254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006770362,0.000059519152,0.00006232816,0.0004330011,0.0031243635,0.00053388113,0.00007326733,0.00015695754,0.0000055105147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011536287,0.000066243694,0.001014995,0.000009245365,0.00014136266,0.0000012680987,0.0021147744,0.000010595152,0.0000023841237,0.99648416,0.000054688135,0.0000887671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039473944,0.00013527682,0.0020207479,0.00011927202,0.0025792194,8.191408e-7,0.008143868,0.00060446525,0.0001380404,0.9367161,0.04884186,0.00030563425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009919936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011097457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80473477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033501117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000064638276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99958855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2383346827","doi":"10.33137/cal.v1i2.22160","title":"Uncovering the Latent Disunity of Property Law?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Analysis of Law","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogical self; Property (philosophy); State (computer science); Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.031500243983139456,"score_gpt":0.3200148942817202,"score_spread":0.28851465029858075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2383346827","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24760267,0.00026970412,0.00067052344,0.019174892,0.00017999957,0.00016439709,0.00003231954,0.00005452203,0.731851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987267,0.000021291275,0.00009961773,0.00062263606,0.000062366904,0.00000262011,0.0000024663943,0.0000022357362,0.0004600283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899197,0.00022397333,0.0001794133,0.0001049318,0.0003465275,0.00015320732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919605,0.0003268359,0.0000365735,0.0001846616,0.00019124102,0.00006463791],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073672645,0.000052670795,0.00022450261,0.0000040087625,0.00040756623,0.000028544868,0.00025855974,0.000070003705,0.00024571636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035033686,0.00002554509,0.00030055598,0.00040153385,0.0018406276,0.00009234517,0.000047608846,0.000094520554,0.0000036972663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024921314,0.00006178549,0.00065219635,0.000015604983,0.00018229836,1.4314035e-7,0.0028721525,0.000101010664,0.00015753698,0.9956623,0.00011969516,0.00017282527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037787232,0.00018448225,0.005529441,0.00010727005,0.007365534,3.0279946e-7,0.014030448,0.0025759954,0.004175095,0.23876639,0.72634196,0.0005452249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006047214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006320002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75689584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015407068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014414257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91416186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2609191095","doi":"10.33137/cal.v4i1.28144","title":"The Legitimate Scope of Criminal Law: A Question for Legal History?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Analysis of Law","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Public law; Appropriation; Private law; Political science; Scope (computer science); Normative; Comparative law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.048544400015573655,"score_gpt":0.3962482599841172,"score_spread":0.3477038599685436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2609191095","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.080405526,0.009296963,0.0016822151,0.016558086,0.0010950593,0.00036199408,0.00002124977,0.00006211175,0.8905168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980355,0.00016756917,0.00039523075,0.000083041174,0.00009905745,0.000008111215,0.0000032952034,0.000004226125,0.0012040008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990515,0.00010166529,0.00024064883,0.00013461083,0.00026655637,0.0002050113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998682,0.0004887212,0.000107947526,0.00029218607,0.0003561366,0.00007299397],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008019824,0.00006174353,0.00026023466,0.000039310773,0.0011783029,0.00010031167,0.00038207488,0.00008727562,0.000101130965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00097277394,0.00004335957,0.00027021972,0.00006673391,0.0034234389,0.00020481243,0.00003190987,0.00006834262,0.0000037700406],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026854468,0.00004399995,0.000043917178,0.000017810507,0.00019975346,0.000001273888,0.0012013708,0.000007889431,0.0001019286,0.9973838,0.00041009387,0.00056135084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042308372,0.00021680185,0.0010980846,0.00018766089,0.009179724,5.25659e-7,0.004821935,0.0022137973,0.0028945655,0.058461413,0.92017716,0.0003252401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014580781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048121745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93892235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048895396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054306798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612230206","doi":"10.33137/cal.v4i1.28143","title":"Making Modern Criminal Law Theory: Reflections on Farmer","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Analysis of Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Public law; Law; Civil law (Civil law); Interpretation (philosophy); Relation (database); Philosophy of law; Private law; Comparative law; Political science; Order (exchange); Theory of criminal justice; Sociology; Criminal justice; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.25974253422175475,"score_gpt":0.5072798401635514,"score_spread":0.24753730594179668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612230206","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029442562,0.0001015098,0.003866455,0.011164396,0.00022143677,0.00006186034,0.000017797563,0.000047610174,0.9550764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978602,0.000008459941,0.00039469393,0.0008588399,0.00014531963,0.00000558551,0.000002012533,0.0000063485436,0.000718532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985204,0.00018825011,0.00021473637,0.00028824486,0.00046803,0.0003203404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984109,0.000611235,0.00007156802,0.0005431999,0.00023405593,0.00012903482],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085170346,0.000098828044,0.00029920475,0.00008581128,0.0031644956,0.00039866372,0.0005152729,0.00008689982,0.0007116013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011145772,0.000089158915,0.00032351847,0.00015844994,0.0031018178,0.0003538004,0.00007186061,0.00014385337,0.00003804312],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034036562,0.00008419669,0.00008985728,0.000011567031,0.00014836776,0.000008033673,0.0019657048,0.000024758612,0.00017880928,0.99627763,0.000037007405,0.0011400328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016537234,0.000177014,0.0022749354,0.00017359483,0.009760121,0.0000014116035,0.0055835843,0.0010733202,0.0007543138,0.8432363,0.13628091,0.0005191036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00551756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025729664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96841764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004322933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003561406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913946162","doi":"10.33137/cal.v5i2.32053","title":"Literary Analysis of Law: Reorienting the Connections Between Law and Literature","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Analysis of Law","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Statutory law; Law and literature; Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy of law; Sociology; Common law; Political science; Work (physics); Epistemology; Comparative law; Philosophy; Linguistics; Engineering","score_opus":0.024355897885776717,"score_gpt":0.34859086310769527,"score_spread":0.3242349652219185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913946162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38962445,0.0037359623,0.00048436102,0.015122156,0.00023968701,0.0002141459,0.0006573849,0.00009607374,0.5898258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977935,0.000055543333,0.00028657916,0.0012422146,0.0002874029,0.0000037236787,0.00005471293,0.000004174256,0.00027214998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984235,0.0003022788,0.00036392297,0.00026706557,0.00039554312,0.00024770206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979242,0.0009353823,0.000089998524,0.0002960906,0.0006331751,0.00012113131],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080827944,0.00010582245,0.00050314306,0.00004289981,0.0012636046,0.00018062984,0.0002626053,0.00018976709,0.00031562976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002685183,0.000072733405,0.00060281635,0.0030813704,0.0046945536,0.00028962857,0.000074561256,0.00018216437,0.0000018320051],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032252046,0.00003850758,0.002639431,0.000013952268,0.003059673,9.349529e-7,0.025474576,0.0000022529305,0.000069689886,0.96853733,0.00011179334,0.00004862965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004825988,0.00022854778,0.011486568,0.000253551,0.11887629,0.000001240793,0.03030369,0.0012807159,0.0020985627,0.37111834,0.4629509,0.0009190036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020676001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00657109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6081691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001543205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015264153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980788208","doi":"10.33137/cal.v6i1.32563","title":"Chester Brown and the Queerness of Johns","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Analysis of Law","topic":"Gender, Feminism, and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Memoir; Comics; Innocence; Scholarship; Mainstream; Construct (python library); Gender studies; Romance; Human sexuality; Identity (music); Sociology; Kinship; Narrative; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Aesthetics; Art; Law; Political science; Literature","score_opus":0.024138714559670184,"score_gpt":0.32595772121494937,"score_spread":0.30181900665527917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980788208","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8098136,0.00033956853,0.00013727041,0.004878384,0.00012048146,0.0000948641,0.000008582562,0.000008659459,0.18459855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999021,0.00007820461,0.000044031985,0.00031158593,0.000036899102,0.0000020260748,0.0000013722544,0.0000021685262,0.0005027001],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917686,0.00012555353,0.00017380122,0.000111265275,0.00027304442,0.00013945956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989015,0.00072197174,0.000031575277,0.00015588339,0.00011440498,0.000074675925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064242125,0.00004555191,0.00029396176,0.0000481874,0.0000640929,0.000017882703,0.0001462661,0.000054197357,0.00035586293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029417436,0.000029179666,0.00015836346,0.00029338922,0.001519598,0.000059374346,0.00003167804,0.000050884253,0.0000076849055],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013816015,0.00003677739,0.005594104,0.000026885196,0.00019928292,4.3032153e-7,0.0147609655,0.000002258949,0.00012789597,0.97891974,0.00003980726,0.00027802432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007471372,0.00039405216,0.22215237,0.00026998218,0.031003507,0.0000031903846,0.314935,0.0030967772,0.013258104,0.16440508,0.24133816,0.0016724153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020771879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014111231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8145147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000052384307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030159943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5599022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982100027","doi":"10.33137/cal.v6i1.32562","title":"Queering Queer Legal Studies: An Unreconstructed Ode to Eve Sedgwick (and Others)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Analysis of Law","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Queer theory; Extant taxon; Sensibility; Field (mathematics); Ode; Sociology; Gender studies; Law; Art; Political science; Literature; Mathematics; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.035714484151659634,"score_gpt":0.3698533264607879,"score_spread":0.33413884230912827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982100027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9301224,0.0006424364,0.00011075839,0.0060759275,0.00017587226,0.00014456204,0.000020003019,0.00006364898,0.062644444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968891,0.00005791102,0.0007140328,0.0013553622,0.00008270747,0.0000043748087,0.0000022632487,0.000005876897,0.00088838034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988283,0.00013208494,0.00021283737,0.00026924495,0.00029915327,0.0002583637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990638,0.0002547857,0.000027570519,0.00018205662,0.0002672024,0.00020459852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041598172,0.0000962076,0.00038806984,0.00002060703,0.0002555748,0.0000746189,0.00018012978,0.00011454034,0.00051836396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025487682,0.00008113357,0.00017734844,0.00056914584,0.0008355593,0.00028660445,0.0000458651,0.00010664594,0.000020324882],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072665316,0.000031684554,0.003381379,0.000026909662,0.0007136094,0.0000014890966,0.019975794,0.00006539647,0.0003909417,0.9750526,0.0001875738,0.00016535124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014519127,0.0004507823,0.008877904,0.00038778593,0.009900203,0.0000031895652,0.46448854,0.0031208016,0.0017429952,0.069508545,0.43780005,0.0022673106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015839728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040945658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90554404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004843284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003414669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5675722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998011070","doi":"10.33137/cal.v6i2.33495","title":"Still Comfortable After All These Years: A Response","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Analysis of Law","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Democracy; Law; Tone (literature); Sociology; State (computer science); Function (biology); Law and economics; Political science; Literature; Politics; Art","score_opus":0.021709264117363864,"score_gpt":0.3427174305297845,"score_spread":0.32100816641242064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998011070","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96655136,0.00029442392,0.000013727417,0.0028295696,0.00007186135,0.00007555506,0.0000349209,0.00003010398,0.030098485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948919,0.00003147335,0.000218119,0.0016584763,0.00004121986,0.0000066618354,0.000004745593,0.0000044709977,0.0031429753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987678,0.00024078331,0.00016831391,0.00017624281,0.00039037058,0.0002564844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899364,0.0005161956,0.000023952289,0.00022995041,0.00011680225,0.0001194716],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079035485,0.00006570462,0.00026325317,0.000015095207,0.000026332473,0.000054394386,0.00021314062,0.00012822347,0.0042275055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025525046,0.000054643646,0.0003500672,0.000490162,0.00065072277,0.00016665798,0.000039669972,0.00010173712,0.000117947624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020848226,0.00016343697,0.0034281923,0.000016355894,0.0006918492,0.000012586328,0.045469817,0.00003254128,0.0004493627,0.9489231,0.0005515743,0.000052673786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013774027,0.000045771463,0.004475152,0.000018230066,0.0012184572,1.3502664e-7,0.0053591947,0.00013037992,0.000080145386,0.006973455,0.9814011,0.00016023233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006953742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080479775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9808495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030042716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003477379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99668276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998376606","doi":"10.33137/cal.v6i2.33491","title":"Writings and Their Publics: Law and Literature in the Eighteenth Century","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Analysis of Law","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Publicity; Scholarship; Expression (computer science); The Renaissance; Diversity (politics); Literature; Publics; History; Law; History of literature; Literary criticism; Sociology; Aesthetics; Classics; Political science; Philosophy; Art; Art history","score_opus":0.011675168918361832,"score_gpt":0.28527372984232874,"score_spread":0.2735985609239669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998376606","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55919933,0.014322511,0.00000714435,0.02727787,0.00008405244,0.00021864379,0.000074129195,0.000029463987,0.39878684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994859,0.0012304384,0.00005402637,0.0037106413,0.0000590031,0.0000030634505,0.000011846335,0.0000024864864,0.00006949645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907064,0.0001847722,0.00014673325,0.00018491947,0.00021528968,0.00019766545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922055,0.00043678057,0.000023512193,0.00013462151,0.000116636176,0.000067927154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006404927,0.000077847835,0.00022733382,0.000013443834,0.00025270187,0.0002836404,0.00018121806,0.00013652616,0.000119341115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009762503,0.000044404256,0.00012690101,0.0006258076,0.0010470935,0.00029959972,0.000041552612,0.00018521716,0.0000015676264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002112882,0.000037742335,0.0016559089,0.000021867427,0.000070285525,0.0000014246208,0.02199388,2.2268259e-7,0.000036872792,0.9759359,0.00015507462,0.00008872478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053443026,0.00008056467,0.005432324,0.0001826117,0.0009656009,0.0000036958268,0.16727227,0.0003147559,0.00010263248,0.10566065,0.7189737,0.0004767582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050215016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012282779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87027526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008893801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008816544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38580596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127957706","doi":"10.33137/cal.v7i2.35219","title":"Modernism and the Criminal","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Analysis of Law","topic":"Crime and Detective Fiction Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Leverhulme Trust; McGill University","keywords":"Modernism (music); Literature; Art; Aesthetics; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.11080689360861691,"score_gpt":0.30513619150947524,"score_spread":0.19432929790085834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127957706","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13402505,0.0041258805,0.008471306,0.06793879,0.00018928954,0.00018469883,0.00016033761,0.00012568074,0.78477895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973769,0.000014949857,0.00001928858,0.0023149468,0.000121310026,0.0000038121864,0.0000013022947,0.0000025751776,0.00014491794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953645,0.000033829176,0.00013974721,0.00010927211,0.000108404216,0.00007231689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994592,0.00029679583,0.00001619804,0.0000674447,0.00011997013,0.00004041381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000067468965,0.00005513892,0.00024754202,0.000028967623,0.00024205884,0.00005934097,0.000050038463,0.000010566287,0.00072804803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010289769,0.000032229713,0.0001596057,0.000041871233,0.0016051128,0.00005747906,0.000043995253,0.000055111785,0.000011661784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047677247,0.000012348418,0.000011650979,0.000013853597,0.00043998088,6.77753e-7,0.014551478,0.000003843628,0.000018635918,0.9845414,0.00022213659,0.00013632639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027650779,0.00048770584,0.0014957446,0.000025772903,0.0447602,0.0000024886765,0.07701015,0.0728434,0.0012245151,0.13501284,0.6636216,0.0007505225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021531653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019358342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8633518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000016376566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000202556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7971616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W341925358","doi":"10.33137/cal.v1i1.20923","title":"Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Legal Studies Beyond Both Disciplinarity and Interdisciplinarity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Analysis of Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Meaning (existential); Virtue; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Critical reflection; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Social science; Philosophy; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.07251374655372697,"score_gpt":0.45224369480041626,"score_spread":0.37972994824668926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W341925358","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75745153,0.00039858813,0.0021530958,0.1875482,0.0001609235,0.00012641573,0.00004877871,0.000046487705,0.052065965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99828804,0.00003316791,0.0006582859,0.00038954566,0.00013669298,0.000007065101,0.00000854616,0.0000036573424,0.00047499748],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873066,0.00026954888,0.00029985665,0.00024902617,0.00026143607,0.00018945578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973759,0.0019462924,0.00007108988,0.00015310232,0.0002954122,0.00015820227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012766301,0.0000917187,0.00038617826,0.00014452056,0.0008219181,0.00023015524,0.00011529251,0.00007443634,0.000076470686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025722822,0.00008065096,0.00007968523,0.00066878897,0.0011018998,0.00070415036,0.00016674674,0.00022462926,0.000003162492],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008668365,0.00007681219,0.019914696,0.000031911197,0.00040181182,4.0305645e-7,0.009973747,0.000002671327,0.0000115937555,0.96856534,0.00051793206,0.00049439154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008202954,0.00035956595,0.30104232,0.000111604066,0.011682441,0.000002546298,0.07630261,0.0034783692,0.00009126151,0.32855037,0.27659568,0.00096294965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017709066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006133796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.640015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031601052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006646008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63216126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385596985","doi":"10.33137/cal.v3i1.26460","title":"Saving Faith","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Analysis of Law","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Optimal distinctiveness theory; Faith; Promotion (chess); Religious freedom; Exportation; Power (physics); Law; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Economic freedom; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.03185523707320964,"score_gpt":0.36010187467848354,"score_spread":0.3282466376052739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385596985","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019984696,0.00007351992,0.008069307,0.010929885,0.00006906089,0.000023379895,0.00005933671,0.00003132332,0.9607595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99800193,0.000011243571,0.00037880117,0.0005278168,0.00008451558,0.0000011619587,0.0000011638641,0.0000016444277,0.000991744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924517,0.000077118835,0.00014040567,0.00010089686,0.0002441932,0.00019224697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872106,0.00087676104,0.000020870817,0.00010110604,0.00015108299,0.0001291131],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020622471,0.000040368162,0.0001702604,0.00005633522,0.00019724532,0.000013763304,0.0001220942,0.0000336791,0.0012942947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006586828,0.00002721798,0.00015345849,0.00030556094,0.0029721127,0.00010147528,0.0000188357,0.000023700159,0.000026140518],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001271829,0.00001840926,0.0015442373,0.0000013721176,0.000106439125,0.0000015352723,0.000063383915,0.0000013188717,0.00015246845,0.99767184,0.00007630659,0.00036144213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001132001,0.00003076925,0.0035971848,0.000035828412,0.0019007368,3.582108e-7,0.000613169,0.000021228487,0.00024105432,0.036087822,0.9571293,0.00022936997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002572838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013746263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9780172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000311493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015279913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W608446170","doi":"10.33137/cal.v2i2.26083","title":"Effect and Technique in Legal Aesthetics","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Analysis of Law","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Aesthetics; Legal realism; Balance (ability); Meaning (existential); Context (archaeology); Proportionality (law); Empirical legal studies; Legal formalism; Legal pluralism; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Legal profession; Political science; Art; Psychology; Philosophy; Black letter law; History; Comparative law; Private law","score_opus":0.019706348481952365,"score_gpt":0.3583304323864481,"score_spread":0.3386240839044957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W608446170","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46812278,0.0014703715,0.00080236857,0.013599587,0.000110992536,0.0003490167,0.000011337961,0.00008967511,0.51544386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99918455,0.000031584324,0.00042649652,0.0001964785,0.000023684473,0.000008198068,0.0000017049662,0.0000020025973,0.00012529183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991927,0.00022109074,0.00011761112,0.00010789745,0.00022312714,0.00013758815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995146,0.00018898488,0.000013021626,0.0000802508,0.0000878307,0.000115361174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001072082,0.00004780773,0.00020913898,0.000014101137,0.000064168125,0.00003058997,0.00009649963,0.00011381146,0.000066534085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003816861,0.000038194998,0.00010028682,0.0005017561,0.0009771102,0.00009726577,0.000024199522,0.00009375942,0.0000018319873],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005164727,0.000039294606,0.0015686464,0.000009132125,0.000036112928,0.000005165511,0.0019235681,0.000005680872,0.000063787564,0.99592745,0.00015680662,0.00025919973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015852477,0.0011340315,0.0019772712,0.00018765496,0.006457852,0.0000074864574,0.019038778,0.0014383165,0.009795294,0.2413302,0.715851,0.0011968234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001356398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019155811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75459725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024048697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002375896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36002034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}