{"meta":{"query_hash":"da66cf6640ee","filters":{"venue":"Critical Disability Discourses"},"cohort_total":24,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":24,"exported":24,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/da66cf6640ee","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Critical+Disability+Discourses"},"results":[{"id":"W1485742611","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.31564","title":"RACE AND MADNESS: LOCATING THE EXPERIENCES OF RACIALIZED PEOPLE WITH PSYCHIATRIC HISTORIES IN CANADA AND THE UNITED STATES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices","field":"Psychology","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Psychiatry; Gerontology; Criminology; Psychology; Sociology; Gender studies; Medicine","score_opus":0.02332619082048788,"score_gpt":0.3193619812963147,"score_spread":0.29603579047582684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1485742611","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9827662,0.0023237416,0.00011214947,0.01170488,0.0008090114,0.00027008392,0.0000073674114,0.00001072871,0.0019958022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99924797,0.000042766118,0.00011033065,0.0003631067,0.000047731268,0.00013134566,0.000002673984,0.0000080940445,0.00004599086],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981804,0.0006206674,0.00037557472,0.0003013486,0.0002475758,0.0002744249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964203,0.0029843801,0.000092317685,0.0003172927,0.00005490003,0.00013076184],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057851395,0.00014777307,0.00032769158,0.000022196375,0.00022651933,0.000017552822,0.00021271448,0.00004693225,0.00035277772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016791506,0.00007263338,0.000025023663,0.0003818909,0.005041403,0.00013633081,0.00004417102,0.0002701249,6.5647396e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002589946,0.00087781495,0.35704237,0.0002768591,0.000053284348,0.0000065940426,0.48459917,0.0000023880955,8.8446365e-7,0.15135592,0.0012728827,0.0019218837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001417604,0.00017602168,0.113080814,0.000034654015,0.00014057159,0.000014753203,0.8740808,0.00007517215,0.0000034856303,0.009002482,0.0017696118,0.00020404607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6906443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69878006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3894816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000713403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002003449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1502938431","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.23385","title":"IS THERE REFUGE FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES WITHIN THE 1951 CONVENTION RELATING TO THE STATUS OF REFUGEES?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Convention; Political science; Psychology; Gerontology; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.028177991421123837,"score_gpt":0.3781900792505546,"score_spread":0.3500120878294308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1502938431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92431194,0.000106453386,0.001319244,0.07018664,0.00014431722,0.00090394245,0.00019783225,0.000045262277,0.0027844077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977469,0.0000104240535,0.0003786681,0.000697535,0.00012686968,0.00007657623,0.000012448505,0.0000093400695,0.00094126246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810743,0.00034063074,0.00035410846,0.00027986208,0.00044798647,0.000469971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974682,0.0016082737,0.00007343283,0.00043529356,0.00023685298,0.00017795329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089760625,0.00013324834,0.00021150471,0.000010864363,0.0007794257,0.00013307192,0.0002850165,0.00006928146,0.00020289388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006542984,0.000069840455,0.00012394032,0.00029431513,0.0020453914,0.00023211491,0.000024375737,0.00014920557,0.0000056741296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007936881,0.00022589184,0.034005813,0.00004942709,0.000009989292,4.6264166e-8,0.040816516,0.00007241031,0.000014635059,0.92345774,0.00041966478,0.0008484883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006261022,0.0010319885,0.19910167,0.00027277312,0.00024460428,0.0000010163552,0.5417317,0.0024665208,0.0001765869,0.19205639,0.06173277,0.00055788126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059390144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026887715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7314014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012186528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001683547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99086905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1550500331","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.23854","title":"INTIMATE ASSEMBLAGES: DISABILITY, INTERCORPOREALITY, AND THE LABOUR OF ATTENDANT CARE","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Gender studies; Psychology","score_opus":0.03678561766810474,"score_gpt":0.40219218878494917,"score_spread":0.36540657111684444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1550500331","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9429693,0.00026796063,0.000046272507,0.038504295,0.0007826584,0.000488803,0.00019849163,0.00007520442,0.016666979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99906784,0.00007520765,0.0001224639,0.00024644408,0.00030983513,0.000050207513,0.000007776462,0.00001421654,0.00010599089],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968535,0.00078507984,0.00055897585,0.00052246306,0.0007500586,0.0005299799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952293,0.0033847052,0.00007886474,0.00067457353,0.00039344965,0.0002390956],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002505625,0.0002379892,0.0005604005,0.000014439796,0.00080421835,0.0001741302,0.0005364848,0.00015668983,0.00017555467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011186167,0.0001569535,0.00020889753,0.00017765294,0.038967863,0.00026678276,0.00043691997,0.00041821768,0.0000059856334],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068751186,0.00043812284,0.18815118,0.00041987147,0.000031822747,9.447161e-7,0.072658814,2.0996487e-7,0.00009073435,0.73390305,0.00020444866,0.00403208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005660269,0.00007198179,0.25576556,0.00004308421,0.00012481624,0.0000020125174,0.61043584,0.000012945359,0.00014637895,0.13007182,0.0024653636,0.0002941849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007839643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040437058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6038312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008576354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012624575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99876726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1681414090","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.23848","title":"LESSONS TO BE LEARNED: THE DECISION OF THE SOCIAL BENEFITS TRIBUNAL IN TRANCHEMONTAGNE V. ONTARIO (DIRECTOR, DISABILITY SUPPORT PROGRAM)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Program director; Psychology; Political science; Management; Medical education; Medicine; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.07690490613691789,"score_gpt":0.4254042561545593,"score_spread":0.34849935001764143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1681414090","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8286972,0.000026472646,0.000002729763,0.16739659,0.000622956,0.0011785385,0.000110798275,0.00005184057,0.0019128829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988797,0.0000046039727,0.00021238627,0.00022711002,0.00027932366,0.00023658575,0.000005529691,0.0000129334,0.00014183788],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964364,0.00047596375,0.0006047991,0.00059450464,0.0010928796,0.0007954295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968859,0.0020748952,0.00006709813,0.0005016526,0.00022087307,0.00024956418],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016897041,0.00027046909,0.00050275703,0.000010551667,0.0016083791,0.00015467884,0.00092692213,0.00023918993,0.0009100219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008580242,0.0001536239,0.00043095407,0.0004989638,0.010566519,0.00028339386,0.00030054647,0.00084443437,0.000008866938],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019865051,0.0041417014,0.7125259,0.00005997762,0.000031209034,0.0000012450323,0.09701781,0.000007722261,0.00032428117,0.081623875,0.0009995694,0.103068076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029001661,0.00007400212,0.9563853,0.000026382382,0.000058333575,5.25512e-7,0.02611834,0.0000029213845,0.00018717092,0.005185548,0.0114431465,0.00022827726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09069031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9093647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8186744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060478545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027683403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1711742294","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.23386","title":"FEDERAL SUPPORTS FOR ABORIGINAL PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Gerontology; Medicine","score_opus":0.01782879150976669,"score_gpt":0.3859390398241028,"score_spread":0.36811024831433614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1711742294","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9131591,0.000076106175,0.00058537663,0.022583188,0.00064224016,0.001134834,0.000091017464,0.0001505342,0.061577655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953673,0.00010500513,0.00075362157,0.00014664415,0.0010786972,0.000028989545,0.000042104097,0.000013250342,0.0024643734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976518,0.00020216427,0.0003096427,0.00045823504,0.00044723047,0.00093088514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99779344,0.0011581979,0.00003465959,0.00031998561,0.00026904364,0.0004246497],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006092543,0.00019508295,0.000299911,0.000021900332,0.0055313255,0.00022979232,0.00022642396,0.000118942604,0.00048891857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016238137,0.00014181597,0.00012542379,0.00016640418,0.0030444302,0.0005493894,7.125195e-7,0.00013488965,0.000018109007],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006920333,0.0011167614,0.032680184,0.00010266848,0.0000051926263,5.2264664e-7,0.108865015,0.0000011459588,4.724829e-7,0.85653955,0.00031961862,0.00029968386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006158899,0.001202708,0.11366719,0.00010012949,0.00011718073,0.000007987328,0.20769377,0.000015664233,0.00007508403,0.2918344,0.38379893,0.0008710593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019865077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5752778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56470513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027996232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005570315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1827464074","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.31560","title":"THE HUMAN BOTTOM OF NON-HUMAN THINGS: ON CRITICAL THEORY AND ITS CONTRIBUTIONS TO CRITICAL DISABILITY STUDIES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Critical theory; Disability studies; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Gender studies","score_opus":0.06730044580323861,"score_gpt":0.4632368880992967,"score_spread":0.39593644229605807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1827464074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8694585,0.000775128,0.0004441658,0.09539185,0.000905538,0.0010908502,0.0006056778,0.0001773491,0.031150965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982449,0.0000226425,0.000110397945,0.0009788302,0.0003596296,0.00016609076,0.0000031247364,0.00001759803,0.00009679815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99524355,0.0015480183,0.0007828928,0.0007303317,0.00050067477,0.0011945607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9752147,0.022435794,0.000039891685,0.00067711895,0.00061348366,0.0010190043],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004054473,0.00031709508,0.0006351263,0.000026099642,0.00303317,0.00015734139,0.0005880599,0.00022589741,0.00039202452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09912144,0.00023445503,0.00024815768,0.00016726201,0.035643745,0.00062529166,0.00033776514,0.0005367543,0.000041443007],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007188256,0.0014419861,0.002565336,0.00014913022,0.00003704326,0.0000025476547,0.0051096464,5.1263854e-8,0.00010879332,0.98993474,0.00019363382,0.00038522654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019348996,0.00040294646,0.029219352,0.00014242517,0.00015752998,0.0000010346525,0.035144135,0.000005126119,0.0006916062,0.9330754,0.00063511176,0.00033181944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00051829714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00061532727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1287864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031217682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012247829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99826473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1859396277","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.31558","title":"CONSIDERING THE METHODOLOGICAL COMPLEXITIES OF THE INTERVIEW APPROACH WHEN EXPLORING THE WORK OF MOTHERING AND DISABILITY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Psychology; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.833005997358399,"score_gpt":0.5548122252345867,"score_spread":0.27819377212381224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1859396277","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.935963,0.0008607422,0.014586661,0.037667356,0.0002338835,0.0007411479,0.000032693595,0.000031919946,0.0098825935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869208,0.00006295638,0.0127695855,0.00008041869,0.00006433399,0.000079474885,2.0809235e-7,0.000007722697,0.000014547471],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9853361,0.013053113,0.00044791753,0.000274801,0.00052329194,0.00036476424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9755347,0.023571987,0.00007587512,0.0005681636,0.00014552107,0.00010379106],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016621722,0.00013526324,0.0003770011,0.000006524143,0.0006871123,0.00005640268,0.0006746644,0.00006545286,0.00018636725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02916631,0.000059678034,0.00020672315,0.00020766181,0.05628391,0.00019886666,0.00047537216,0.00045396152,4.1972098e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029512225,0.00025781253,0.04423966,0.000389655,0.000028706563,8.323997e-8,0.11636729,0.0000016195002,0.000028658103,0.82754946,0.000009995168,0.011097536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048629696,0.00003432856,0.16531111,0.00013282463,0.000036405225,4.291587e-7,0.28390062,0.000022974647,0.00024097868,0.5500249,0.00016097743,0.000085801046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016598008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004284777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27752456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004341994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057196627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9790114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1908025651","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.23852","title":"“WE CAN’T CLOSE IT YET”: HOW DISCOURSE POSITIONS PEOPLE WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual disability; Psychology; Linguistics; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.027886697920173228,"score_gpt":0.3714191419112241,"score_spread":0.3435324439910509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1908025651","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64699894,0.000025108624,0.00022866322,0.335634,0.00075726036,0.0006195512,0.00022821478,0.00017505976,0.01533321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949998,0.000031814754,0.00037695494,0.00020823748,0.0006110822,0.000191348,0.00007056314,0.00003751205,0.0034726746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99626464,0.0005066885,0.00039385786,0.00088834536,0.0009873904,0.0009590947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99275184,0.0053147096,0.000055014152,0.00090877456,0.00028410766,0.00068553153],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006007724,0.00037642603,0.00046053217,0.00004960409,0.0015695438,0.0007480482,0.0005673017,0.00024070188,0.004600655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010535991,0.00026520385,0.00026589417,0.00046645539,0.02414499,0.0010914986,0.000120978926,0.00063754834,0.00011467324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000109002445,0.0031425762,0.038564924,0.00015296669,0.000048581984,0.0000036478775,0.09534334,0.000005776328,0.000232733,0.8524629,0.007807756,0.0021258038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005444941,0.00033767664,0.015167384,0.000120821045,0.0002832059,0.000013048802,0.79518133,0.00007616342,0.0003298253,0.1735322,0.013416977,0.0009968665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035259645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13623393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.699838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018407578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004419347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1926460403","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.31553","title":"IN THE MATTER OF THE FEMALE MIND: AN ANALYSIS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA’S APPROACH TO WOMEN AND MENTAL HEALTH","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Mental health; Law; Psychology; Political science; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.03688513608631631,"score_gpt":0.33467628247499454,"score_spread":0.2977911463886782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1926460403","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97489643,0.000044791526,0.0000050266262,0.017780183,0.00007278307,0.00034335357,0.00013866695,0.0000010406118,0.0067177243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99944663,0.0000011964931,0.000015228923,0.0004575592,0.000024037126,0.000015844216,7.851115e-7,0.0000027793562,0.000035965455],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982571,0.00052005256,0.0003243353,0.00017096207,0.00047591567,0.0002516378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993013,0.0001672066,0.00006805886,0.000306012,0.000059516013,0.00009789387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010795883,0.0000711348,0.00029017235,0.000016083284,0.0002140034,0.000015248212,0.00044387096,0.000031177227,0.00011958061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037153784,0.000035416124,0.00006761448,0.00042672525,0.0019767117,0.00011697863,0.000069794776,0.00006991566,1.1947472e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020133282,0.00074745686,0.793794,0.00016258728,0.000037338454,4.667215e-8,0.17649676,0.0000046278774,0.00002204194,0.028161306,0.0004805579,0.00007316757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046994388,0.0000350026,0.7915693,0.00002045801,0.00003940159,1.3334136e-7,0.2061085,0.000013606361,0.00006908165,0.0018554346,0.00019032626,0.000051763058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.70857084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8170732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.108502425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010922178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044307156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72832763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1954207522","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.31281","title":"DEFINING MORE INCLUSIVE SOCIAL POLICIES FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.09757285892550807,"score_gpt":0.4434857787774283,"score_spread":0.3459129198519202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1954207522","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7033817,0.00016889155,0.0013678756,0.25912935,0.0003719481,0.0007827983,0.00023063752,0.0002838288,0.03428297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99694633,0.0000097368475,0.0016015338,0.0006932453,0.00036293347,0.00024501793,0.000016562295,0.000020730837,0.00010393248],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806195,0.00024905405,0.0003208321,0.00035854487,0.00036279985,0.0006467896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975111,0.0016291535,0.000043258635,0.00020477324,0.00040481993,0.00020693346],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063846767,0.00017355807,0.00031265288,0.000028764834,0.0015078527,0.00008330634,0.0002591771,0.00014295745,0.00044677814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043907883,0.00014447671,0.00010981025,0.00025465104,0.006041921,0.0003599986,0.00007206076,0.00015637394,0.000012340814],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048054208,0.00031665267,0.031871133,0.00013688003,0.000009616635,1.9612223e-7,0.13571787,4.8527607e-8,0.0000015826649,0.82803744,0.00027737586,0.0035831647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002169604,0.00016095009,0.05789519,0.000038768838,0.0000348507,7.252864e-7,0.8343072,0.0000067215615,0.000058940474,0.10057261,0.0064098206,0.00029727005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001949111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017587263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7274648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000189786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032458705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1962653127","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.23383","title":"CRIP UTOPIA AND THE FUTURE OF DISABILITY","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Utopia; Sociology; Environmental ethics; History; Philosophy; Art history","score_opus":0.01904191283916433,"score_gpt":0.3766859409762452,"score_spread":0.35764402813708085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1962653127","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6621903,0.0004654338,0.00007737245,0.31147724,0.0004381858,0.00057533337,0.000030175279,0.00006144459,0.024684476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988178,0.00008328685,0.00009592265,0.00024501063,0.0005158946,0.0000144367705,0.000004025028,0.000004320304,0.00021927933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976894,0.00073414634,0.00038321663,0.00037208034,0.00048756163,0.00033356392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997758,0.0014086729,0.000043597556,0.00048650394,0.00011867805,0.00018458771],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012002084,0.00014076453,0.00032127785,0.0000072766998,0.0005621809,0.00012542652,0.0002871639,0.00011140169,0.00043240568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018477517,0.00007847658,0.00018120177,0.00017722763,0.0323704,0.00038650853,0.00004530241,0.0001638823,0.000006326946],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008793253,0.00065875106,0.02376661,0.000044236822,0.0000059787994,2.1357192e-7,0.0031739178,8.443351e-7,0.000010279953,0.9534694,0.00015363094,0.018628199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043524342,0.00005488192,0.26143312,0.000017103213,0.00006138904,6.1463584e-7,0.022860102,0.000032625827,0.000034892993,0.7107577,0.0041769566,0.00013539076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010189608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012925708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33662748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006635828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054703323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97026294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102907777","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.37455","title":"Mapping Difference: Critical Connections between Crip and Diaspora Communities","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Agricultural Innovations and Practices","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Diaspora; Geography; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.08001395641534935,"score_gpt":0.3283160067433831,"score_spread":0.24830205032803376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102907777","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9412898,0.00019920197,0.000034001474,0.0570049,0.000116639116,0.0002127633,0.0001515781,0.0001051528,0.0008859582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99887073,0.000037522397,0.0001544475,0.0003392957,0.00034864526,0.0000913632,0.000108882305,0.0000013238133,0.000047798323],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985576,0.00023160588,0.00034325416,0.00027727545,0.00020029276,0.00038995437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99351424,0.0058777407,0.000035479952,0.00010998843,0.00024200047,0.00022055236],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019348979,0.00020135308,0.000269788,0.000009133324,0.0008640088,0.00048499985,0.00021847188,0.00012029806,0.002923914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012402949,0.00007662368,0.00007623139,0.0002942137,0.0021333399,0.0007978084,0.00015522345,0.00031176076,0.000057334895],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009578057,0.0008871431,0.76101935,0.00014464719,0.000042859792,0.0000016792233,0.0017581576,3.504985e-7,0.012576613,0.13753887,0.0014137509,0.08460698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037167603,0.000103308215,0.9009613,0.00003704933,0.000024878344,0.0000053965737,0.07296298,0.0000323386,0.000061851635,0.024349445,0.0011932413,0.00023108866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032861975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045797907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13994189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022513495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005348216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99798757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109920990","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.23382","title":"FROM TRAGEDY TO ‘CRIP’ TO HUMAN: THE NEED FOR MULTIPLE UNDERSTANDINGS OF DISABILITY IN PSYCHOTHERAPY","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Family and Disability Support Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tragedy (event); Psychotherapist; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.10226874672297037,"score_gpt":0.46650957055241166,"score_spread":0.3642408238294413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109920990","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89866436,0.00007052212,0.0032961674,0.09302582,0.00036189734,0.0023410816,0.00063211215,0.00005865569,0.0015493658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968471,9.998168e-7,0.00048020235,0.0018621082,0.00023383646,0.00041963195,0.000044560154,0.000027830725,0.000083745435],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960391,0.00048932206,0.0009118038,0.0010964882,0.00050495844,0.000958306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933601,0.004446131,0.0000393497,0.00156483,0.000116345574,0.00047325992],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013327737,0.0003445647,0.0006567676,0.00005847027,0.00022718795,0.000087263,0.0008072736,0.00020109658,0.0015348698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002397914,0.00026069983,0.00035263144,0.00055907964,0.0033006077,0.00018107465,0.00004837485,0.0003647864,0.000047304296],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0052226176,0.018909028,0.6047924,0.00020666461,0.00008516327,0.000004548123,0.026447766,0.000046662015,0.012581551,0.30286753,0.011418445,0.017417638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001362238,0.0011094209,0.66806275,0.000054952212,0.00003023466,6.269602e-7,0.052649807,0.000030041325,0.00067000894,0.2752312,0.00046548358,0.00033323586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029082345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041761026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09818271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025741526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045380537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120883853","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.23387","title":"ABLEISM KITSCH: THE AESTHETICS OF DISABILITY-RELATED ETHICS","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Bioethics and Human Rights Issues","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Kitsch; Ableism; Aesthetics; Disfigurement; Sociology; Art; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Political science; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.0576464287648568,"score_gpt":0.37121338605010795,"score_spread":0.31356695728525114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120883853","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26136258,0.0010696824,0.022428116,0.7039916,0.0010152448,0.000664366,0.000050313938,0.0004006748,0.009017427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966801,0.000039506933,0.0021673143,0.00093942817,0.00007191844,0.0000075273983,0.0000036113001,0.000009379848,0.000081257036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99700195,0.0005090615,0.0006489674,0.0006116723,0.0007313236,0.00049705507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99542975,0.0022836453,0.00007412421,0.0017628375,0.00025162313,0.0001980127],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001549633,0.00025863358,0.00038297207,0.000017634708,0.0004961033,0.0002580585,0.0016551714,0.000307528,0.00010488365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016269293,0.00015671212,0.00024763448,0.0003050748,0.009453778,0.00044198532,0.00023316526,0.0010935958,0.000029543135],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005323572,0.00095533597,0.00067265844,0.000055034223,0.000008097044,0.0000017101844,0.00255382,0.000013189735,0.00004602072,0.9900233,0.00010880966,0.0055567133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015491767,0.00027907273,0.026835363,0.00007364952,0.000040708703,0.0000074973277,0.0005916664,0.0020288534,0.00068719225,0.9672328,0.0017938104,0.00027444388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006284266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000067310924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73531747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052817457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010332177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9932419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137080887","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.23855","title":"THE DISAVOWAL OF THE BODY AS A SOURCE OF INQUIRY IN CRITICAL DISABILITY STUDIES: THE RETURN OF IMPAIRMENT?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Disability studies; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.05590944141961898,"score_gpt":0.45710431477483954,"score_spread":0.4011948733552205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137080887","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92208856,0.00015775365,0.000013316578,0.07403371,0.0010876899,0.0008082211,0.000034845438,0.00001803578,0.0017578787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994844,0.00003245866,0.000021748487,0.000054640714,0.00024296695,0.0000681279,0.0000015130893,0.000011763511,0.00008236602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99509126,0.00165189,0.001091982,0.0004733551,0.0011288946,0.00056261756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838349,0.014064158,0.00016018296,0.0013679895,0.0004130132,0.0001597284],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003630742,0.0002179365,0.0005128191,0.000013190672,0.0008042712,0.000072865085,0.0011090654,0.00017386675,0.00020469009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038801763,0.00009649036,0.0004392614,0.0004805237,0.10237868,0.00032478748,0.00037333564,0.00055175344,0.0000033184042],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001407416,0.0031311277,0.37359557,0.0003264453,0.000041337404,2.7674852e-7,0.033458818,0.00000522628,0.0006515901,0.5871311,0.00018495717,0.0013328405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028668245,0.00016047545,0.3733403,0.00012245956,0.00012831093,0.000001181663,0.286403,0.0000656459,0.0012911909,0.33740717,0.00061041635,0.0001831689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004217708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013428372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25294417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012542517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025538076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96929485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150147348","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.37457","title":"Affective (Dis)Ability: Ian Brown’s Search for “Inner Life” in The Boy in the Moon","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Contemporary Literature and Criticism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Astrobiology; Art; Psychology; Art history; Psychoanalysis; Physics","score_opus":0.048877509074199126,"score_gpt":0.31960767768006937,"score_spread":0.27073016860587024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150147348","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7698087,0.0004749673,0.000037079637,0.19177891,0.00031991355,0.0024005398,0.00022016675,0.00003911902,0.034920603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99426895,0.0000015016587,0.000010586713,0.0036355094,0.00068689464,0.0011212393,0.000041687264,0.000018288158,0.00021534515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728507,0.0007991099,0.00044686,0.00048426347,0.0003762777,0.00060841435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964401,0.0026020366,0.000017832746,0.0006806009,0.00015464085,0.00010475632],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012144358,0.00025466087,0.0003356155,0.000047239613,0.00034821138,0.00093096547,0.00057236216,0.000085035455,0.0008846131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014047109,0.00013643823,0.00022568188,0.00010934257,0.0019358741,0.000830126,0.00006353513,0.0004996529,0.00006262925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052180698,0.0015464957,0.0074466798,0.00024591302,0.000010385333,0.00000431029,0.06990142,9.035969e-7,0.00001129456,0.9122747,0.0065985927,0.0019070806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008810226,0.00048837514,0.10115636,0.000160516,0.00006882747,0.000004437286,0.5737522,0.0002925598,0.000020304662,0.3038832,0.01876821,0.0005239831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00129148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067332434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6083916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005929836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006285367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96858925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410153618","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.39766","title":"Conversations from the Margins: Disability and the Path to Inclusion","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Path (computing); Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Computer network","score_opus":0.019891309761253844,"score_gpt":0.3797468795836286,"score_spread":0.35985556982237477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410153618","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45653415,0.00016263763,0.0005851025,0.52991,0.00044966413,0.0009213705,0.00010477612,0.000051429124,0.011280833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971928,0.000033767312,0.0000823932,0.0020237344,0.00022217279,0.00011700337,0.000014371184,0.0000049892537,0.00030879193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99717486,0.0012415895,0.00032707117,0.000470156,0.00047124192,0.0003150789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99074244,0.008307674,0.000024579504,0.0006471001,0.00011474625,0.0001634312],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015863559,0.0001421904,0.00023009992,0.0000075445646,0.0031750186,0.00032012913,0.00048247635,0.00008707818,0.00051524345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008226363,0.00006951176,0.00013404779,0.00031837885,0.02474755,0.00028416413,0.0006977224,0.0001841428,0.000025513486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089288194,0.00038751247,0.10913085,0.000024556424,0.000016532265,1.502774e-7,0.01600063,0.0000024990698,0.000007644989,0.86845106,0.0016890004,0.0042002737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038067182,0.0000115024295,0.37111986,0.000042035652,0.00008886209,5.472e-8,0.05019286,0.00011739366,0.000010672207,0.56658554,0.011340864,0.00010967121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020430276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01473601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54065865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016736075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011674606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410153629","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.39772","title":"Embodied Inequality: Fatness, Human Rights and Systemic Oppression in Ontario Schools","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Obesity and Health Practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Embodied cognition; Inequality; Sociology; Human rights; Political science; Gender studies; Law; Epistemology; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08918687073742457,"score_gpt":0.49871805858475415,"score_spread":0.40953118784732956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410153629","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96152174,0.00035048087,0.00007622965,0.011217201,0.0007102509,0.0011521007,0.000028635322,0.00010155663,0.024841812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99692875,0.000009310587,0.00009539393,0.0007145043,0.000113871116,0.00026251387,0.000025036306,0.00001116199,0.0018394617],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952842,0.0019220423,0.0010875489,0.00065240444,0.00028424305,0.00076956605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955243,0.0033295706,0.00011071131,0.00060298387,0.00014116439,0.0002912917],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001729993,0.0002539694,0.0006604243,0.00009151857,0.0018476972,0.000061529936,0.00024409244,0.00040589442,0.0010294757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019958094,0.00020800273,0.00006645677,0.00018664665,0.00080423075,0.0006922718,0.0003179748,0.0018983679,0.000120505196],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009583117,0.0006039847,0.76064795,0.003423481,0.000009518603,0.000005351068,0.001399542,6.594345e-7,0.000056211644,0.23252104,0.0010966263,0.00013982588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009691903,0.00005542672,0.8238679,0.004281679,0.000069295944,0.0000011191474,0.008019486,0.000022792135,0.000014044058,0.15934233,0.0031191234,0.00023758973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14799727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6159609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46796364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071121624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000514355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410242966","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.39773","title":"Mapping Out the Monstrosity of Disabled Bodies in Hunt-Kennedy’s Between Fitness and Death (2020) and Nicholas’ Canadian Carnival Freaks and the Extraordinary Body (2018)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Demon; Art history; Gerontology; Medicine; Literature","score_opus":0.02780453240648244,"score_gpt":0.2872994570654211,"score_spread":0.25949492465893864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410242966","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97231066,0.0003931731,0.000041445233,0.011397643,0.00021423155,0.00039349284,0.00023518232,0.000016468464,0.014997712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958269,0.00007923062,0.000011568408,0.00008908478,0.00015503993,0.000030649753,0.000012982525,0.00000779973,0.003786774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858326,0.00027106458,0.00034086587,0.00034578642,0.00012852465,0.00033052845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843657,0.0010700192,0.000033991157,0.0002743558,0.00006602849,0.00011902219],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043818107,0.00019705822,0.00040173056,0.00004811259,0.0007597138,0.00023370203,0.00014266932,0.000071841394,0.0000695833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049310864,0.00012214379,0.00006977192,0.000039472725,0.0055924184,0.00026101884,0.000117718104,0.00025929193,6.8285334e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002539184,0.000040671715,0.3700473,0.00012229057,0.000025853862,9.0427704e-7,0.006568721,3.9377488e-7,0.0000063745365,0.6225833,0.000035696565,0.0005430706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000656276,0.000039285038,0.92558056,0.00014292721,0.0001245516,0.0000015450445,0.012956101,0.00015671784,0.000010065369,0.05449958,0.005666987,0.0001654126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037829608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23241693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56808376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006897729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000633051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99711376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410446515","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.39776","title":"Uncovering Ableism in Martha Fineman’s Ontological Vulnerability and Resilience Theory: A Critical Disability Theory Perspective","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Ableism; Perspective (graphical); Vulnerability (computing); Resilience (materials science); Sociology; Disability studies; Critical theory; Epistemology; Criminology; Gender studies; Philosophy; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.02803330803956263,"score_gpt":0.417261507166856,"score_spread":0.3892281991272934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410446515","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8084446,0.001238337,0.001637915,0.10567406,0.0009196739,0.0009527296,0.00010351012,0.00023079767,0.08079834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983052,0.000069101094,0.0002569838,0.0006448969,0.0001595409,0.00017788088,0.0000029013133,0.0000138087835,0.00036967045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99170905,0.004270105,0.000709988,0.0014442928,0.000689894,0.0011766893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.974279,0.024031091,0.000038934137,0.0008509717,0.000331747,0.00046825365],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070573483,0.00040013116,0.0007117138,0.000051918043,0.0011367728,0.00031906914,0.0005962656,0.00048957847,0.00070248265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11977018,0.00034687662,0.0002388245,0.0005701774,0.040653586,0.0007620184,0.00037572836,0.0011661262,0.000012635935],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003213888,0.0014677003,0.1455706,0.00021434638,0.000011711978,0.000008879821,0.0062282905,0.000012586748,0.0000070210535,0.84319973,0.0000608758,0.0028968784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021896078,0.00006226796,0.25602964,0.000105945655,0.000046263187,0.0000012146562,0.07100521,0.000038569073,0.000014167821,0.6718014,0.00040067063,0.00027570128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003940719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018872077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18986058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000929232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040197922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410601863","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.39778","title":"“The main problem here is one of social behavior”: Intersectional Identities at the Ontario Hospital, Woodstock, 1918-1968","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Gender studies; Psychology","score_opus":0.0262816624982499,"score_gpt":0.37563847252287713,"score_spread":0.3493568100246272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410601863","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77619,0.0008008551,0.00018873977,0.110478856,0.0060998662,0.00079819624,0.00017210384,0.000058969672,0.10521242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9610648,0.0000056686117,0.00005212345,0.0006580093,0.00029305072,0.00030011273,0.000012104452,0.000012991728,0.037601136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975268,0.0004237289,0.00061704376,0.0004753782,0.0004833248,0.00047372392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99722815,0.0019231563,0.000101543556,0.00051294273,0.000105032166,0.00012920494],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006013016,0.0002104307,0.00032062086,0.000021761203,0.0010661993,0.000077717414,0.0004917865,0.00019751221,0.01065437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008101758,0.00013915321,0.000328066,0.00019723759,0.00616846,0.00019370968,0.00020414393,0.0006985884,0.00013078538],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00066509104,0.008205538,0.07971907,0.0002773968,0.00036856774,0.000007712888,0.015775064,2.8179915e-7,0.0000709383,0.61422646,0.27288175,0.00780217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013730215,0.0009904645,0.46084782,0.00017119158,0.0013499853,0.000017215718,0.076178074,0.0000018730274,0.00010502172,0.16154285,0.29676512,0.0006573555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004114794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02764038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4526836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006089064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018443073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116278418","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.39784","title":"From Tension to Cross-Constituency Solidarity: Coalition Building in Mad Studies","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Mental Health and Patient Involvement","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Women's and Gender Studies et Recherches Féministes","funders":"","keywords":"Dominance (genetics); Control (management); Lived experience; Action (physics); Public policy","score_opus":0.2748554628848459,"score_gpt":0.5631760762663274,"score_spread":0.28832061338148146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116278418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9327368,0.0037667614,0.0011904615,0.04414457,0.010591774,0.0037704096,0.0018316455,0.00009379248,0.0018737902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98690355,0.00027272495,0.0008552356,0.010134704,0.0006334666,0.0006376268,0.00024779383,0.000030465324,0.00028442874],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99022186,0.0024876872,0.0028830047,0.0017232164,0.0006711709,0.0020130663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880166,0.00907079,0.0001563654,0.0011679576,0.00062883075,0.00095945864],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027692593,0.00067365455,0.0013606442,0.00022087517,0.001985414,0.00013676348,0.00046835898,0.00058005325,0.0008903398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00984137,0.00063868484,0.00024838312,0.0008488443,0.003705202,0.00060703204,0.001007003,0.0014047715,0.00035654588],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001079082,0.004879158,0.8064935,0.016359331,0.00008298257,0.00002470213,0.008231293,0.000026844862,0.0004854965,0.1542249,0.002827722,0.0052849827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003509989,0.0007866537,0.36446664,0.04828355,0.00040996633,5.791713e-7,0.13626587,0.0008087883,0.00094873447,0.4403175,0.0029278742,0.0012738412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005369988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037639448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44202685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023460924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009677033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99960643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116293957","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.39789","title":"From Stigma to Strength: Understanding Psycho-Emotional Disablism and the Transformative Potential of Learning Disabilities","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Learning disability; Conversation; Scholarship; Stigma (botany); Disability studies; Cognition; Social model of disability; Cognitive reframing","score_opus":0.038195524612600035,"score_gpt":0.37742593666288776,"score_spread":0.3392304120502877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116293957","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7503034,0.0008911327,0.028451994,0.19167426,0.0023638734,0.00215806,0.000978396,0.00008302961,0.023095857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99835503,0.0002632848,0.00012322488,0.00012382702,0.0004370793,0.00007358025,0.00004686055,0.000017905233,0.0005591842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933644,0.0024242594,0.0012962094,0.001013306,0.0011364983,0.0007653366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98710084,0.0115773855,0.00012470414,0.0005569842,0.00024546686,0.00039459518],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016921723,0.0004743937,0.0009141377,0.000078695266,0.0021736952,0.0006781526,0.00059888867,0.00028427254,0.0018404583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007676153,0.00031966087,0.00052205444,0.00074368337,0.049196616,0.0010625506,0.0002467126,0.0006195634,0.000016411566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00083478197,0.0014052434,0.006977542,0.00054142735,0.00018694499,4.599711e-7,0.06990092,0.00024792558,0.000026726993,0.9149207,0.0003191385,0.004638216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011574342,0.00008930493,0.0117756715,0.00041084053,0.00038652154,3.3495286e-7,0.47003362,0.0019501554,0.000053136217,0.51368266,0.00019120907,0.0002691124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005512727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017471926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.401238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042303948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002592968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116338858","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.39786","title":"Circumcision and forced disability: Routine male neonatal circumcision and the consequences of amputation within a critical disability studies framework","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Genital Health and Disease","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Amputation; Foreskin; Disability studies; Critical reflection; Ableism; Accommodation; Disability pension","score_opus":0.038180895519226925,"score_gpt":0.4223748657994112,"score_spread":0.38419397028018426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116338858","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8683605,0.03496101,0.0022749095,0.08915897,0.0014160458,0.002825895,0.00069953303,0.000074311276,0.00022879867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99697584,0.00041810411,0.0007550626,0.0011469943,0.00030997553,0.00025445613,0.000049630322,0.000040551662,0.000049413473],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99005085,0.002233309,0.0029423656,0.0021272209,0.0013367558,0.0013095244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9520624,0.043357916,0.00026877935,0.001837112,0.0010156771,0.0014581126],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038595062,0.00095868943,0.0023860333,0.0000727617,0.001222235,0.00026970817,0.00042020422,0.0006141421,0.00030196924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13466753,0.00066436926,0.00055456214,0.0008233668,0.11468,0.00072800665,0.00081710354,0.001226077,0.000009134072],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010778127,0.0041637435,0.50109226,0.025889784,0.00020244526,0.00002808495,0.005957691,0.000019136976,0.00010654873,0.42528233,0.000071200615,0.026408656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0047189593,0.0010637668,0.26679742,0.0032446927,0.0026622296,0.000074530566,0.08240812,0.003200526,0.0003067191,0.6348686,0.00001265638,0.00064175954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00053230964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018279726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23429485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005074736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006607742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99958074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}