{"meta":{"query_hash":"488d096fb1ad","filters":{"venue":"Critical Discourse Studies"},"cohort_total":7,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"exported":7,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/488d096fb1ad","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Critical+Discourse+Studies"},"results":[{"id":"W2011915667","doi":"10.1080/17405904.2011.637685","title":"European parliaments under scrutiny: discourse strategies and interaction practices","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Discourse Studies","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Political science; Critical discourse analysis; Discourse analysis; Sociology; Linguistics; Law; Ideology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2415652680950774,"score_gpt":0.4878597289372961,"score_spread":0.24629446084221873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011915667","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24044205,0.0031177178,0.00029346565,0.008454124,0.00085386547,0.00016748763,0.00001667902,0.00012692054,0.7465277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99472684,0.002230725,0.0001983023,0.00061676593,0.0004024044,0.0000071061936,9.35772e-7,0.000018451581,0.0017984707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982138,0.00058340264,0.00022013088,0.0003110495,0.00027875334,0.0003928227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989221,0.0004697781,0.00016590524,0.00016043213,0.00012335539,0.00015842686],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063014514,0.00016300785,0.00018221127,0.000039991566,0.00076330535,0.00023644949,0.00018157787,0.000030159172,0.000111738314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026446674,0.00013445885,0.00004782899,0.00010377108,0.0027401552,0.0017229425,0.00014792013,0.00019659242,0.000113246104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002794137,0.00015441926,0.000799495,0.000028070002,0.00007224116,0.000034757908,0.031782728,5.9311196e-7,0.000033318738,0.9632942,0.0011266696,0.0026455668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000280139,0.00012546251,0.07144125,0.00023024628,0.0001468094,0.0000040598857,0.87920964,0.000003821777,0.000054911965,0.03085815,0.017286528,0.0003590003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007615168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008544951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93243605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036901176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006430982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2734529596","doi":"10.1080/17405904.2017.1352002","title":"The strategic ritual of emotionality in Chinese and Australian hard news: a corpus-based study","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Discourse Studies","topic":"Media Studies and Communication","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Macquarie University","keywords":"Feeling; Construct (python library); Sociology; Context (archaeology); Face (sociological concept); Competition (biology); Media studies; Power (physics); Order (exchange); Public relations; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Social science; History","score_opus":0.1835186246069062,"score_gpt":0.4948764277654411,"score_spread":0.3113578031585349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2734529596","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9347678,0.0014975261,0.0000011899241,0.060061015,0.00021673202,0.00026069264,0.000010007726,0.000008850124,0.0031761762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99868697,0.0009380382,0.0000314484,0.000032736807,0.000092720715,0.000050452585,6.520308e-7,0.000003320275,0.00016364349],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987619,0.00031891192,0.00023024704,0.00016199035,0.0002961995,0.00023078606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837875,0.00091967225,0.00007254003,0.00039278722,0.00017233776,0.00006388968],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092319277,0.000096884716,0.00023796449,0.00001754143,0.0022105223,0.000115628245,0.00036189822,0.00002963951,0.000008365712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028043422,0.0000611991,0.000040772175,0.000060967977,0.0034922292,0.000119151926,0.00017284788,0.0001282984,0.0000017822805],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048351736,0.0006032438,0.6567364,0.000044166223,0.00008345329,0.00000647144,0.014945118,0.0000011898397,0.00000940931,0.32458174,0.00021040747,0.0027300862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037439942,0.000082568265,0.7042223,0.00004210942,0.000028388082,6.054102e-8,0.2705068,0.000011018186,7.999567e-7,0.024440756,0.00021953104,0.00007125668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017720944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04919454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30014098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028716797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007438295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280553537","doi":"10.1080/17405904.2022.2072920","title":"Recovery rhetoric: a critical discourse analysis of substance use recovery","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Discourse Studies","topic":"Mental Health and Patient Involvement","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Oppression; Sociology; Rhetoric; Biopower; Critical discourse analysis; Discourse analysis; Power (physics); Empowerment; Intersectionality; Interpretation (philosophy); Neoliberalism (international relations); Gender studies; Political science; Politics; Social science; Law; Ideology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.35202172202034654,"score_gpt":0.5298737558067884,"score_spread":0.17785203378644188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280553537","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9741123,0.0060566803,0.00073314144,0.0060388865,0.0058510005,0.0010040934,0.0031466868,0.00009348904,0.0029637627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915986,0.0012058306,0.0005317847,0.0027637363,0.0002620546,0.0009843084,0.00029615633,0.000041953273,0.002315599],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99419004,0.0014327376,0.0014147932,0.0006844782,0.001040151,0.0012378248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909485,0.007279701,0.0002232419,0.0006639687,0.0004647621,0.00041984848],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013316976,0.00034603666,0.0011521438,0.0004405307,0.0024372188,0.000015058451,0.0003089178,0.00010040174,0.001802219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016083883,0.00030440593,0.00044169216,0.0013104056,0.00092554756,0.00043183728,0.00038201144,0.0008885753,0.00006226803],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0046466948,0.0077088014,0.3715985,0.010833551,0.00779434,0.00034277432,0.06900099,0.00085989083,0.0002892093,0.41528088,0.10525681,0.0063875313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041236477,0.006454473,0.11521312,0.0038654811,0.013876034,0.0000065963213,0.78737444,0.0015116446,0.00011100304,0.042296994,0.022341771,0.0028247836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024444258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007171134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7183735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070520164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000269788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293084307","doi":"10.1080/17405904.2022.2087702","title":"An ideological square analysis of the podcast discourse in “Chinese Dreams” of the BBC World Service","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Discourse Studies","topic":"Radio, Podcasts, and Digital Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Sociology; Discourse analysis; China; Critical discourse analysis; Narrative; Media studies; Gender studies; Politics; Linguistics; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05156717200208051,"score_gpt":0.42809050436090745,"score_spread":0.37652333235882696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293084307","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9642731,0.0010126687,0.0000034446873,0.025308251,0.00064869714,0.00026242406,0.00021997167,0.000018829836,0.008252604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988561,0.000026726759,0.000014857933,0.00055284565,0.00013816083,0.000059266007,0.0000048641355,0.0000093479985,0.00033781372],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99702,0.00083102187,0.00045636334,0.00032769272,0.00092891493,0.00043598638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997997,0.0010686053,0.00011314956,0.0005086617,0.00019556192,0.00011704037],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007639449,0.00018328239,0.00059611147,0.00017121444,0.0007498548,0.0000351801,0.00092236616,0.000040549072,0.0002438051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021440436,0.00009897617,0.00035067293,0.003524034,0.0036245645,0.0002453406,0.00052379456,0.0003062926,0.0000016542137],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000754023,0.0014177744,0.76648176,0.00007851371,0.00047248244,0.000019771885,0.069550924,0.0009977454,0.00007601034,0.15828888,0.0006313416,0.0019093612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024138592,0.00008276003,0.6861227,0.00005544725,0.0006161218,9.3119405e-7,0.3008496,0.00032341314,0.000011050163,0.0111942645,0.00030288738,0.00019940591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012398143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04809461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23129867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010151962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015214532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311298579","doi":"10.1080/17405904.2022.2152063","title":"Unfit and cast aside: portrayals of mothering with intellectual disability in Québec court reports","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Discourse Studies","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University; McGill University; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual disability; Scholarship; Critical discourse analysis; Ideology; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Aside; Injustice; Power (physics); Discourse analysis; Disability studies; Gender studies; Political science; Psychology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.0470788422940813,"score_gpt":0.3833986682748937,"score_spread":0.33631982598081245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311298579","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9873815,0.0036955778,0.000017116912,0.0036368386,0.00019247615,0.0001783718,0.00002359916,0.000023178824,0.004851317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995352,0.000024077955,0.000029821973,0.000086091655,0.00004235405,0.00008019838,0.0000015536996,0.00001750659,0.00018318769],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870616,0.00010199567,0.0003632303,0.00037549567,0.00018800452,0.00026509416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886554,0.0007215391,0.000044417466,0.000269875,0.000040642906,0.000057967794],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030499778,0.0001454381,0.00038169432,0.00004169782,0.00014597003,0.000007798805,0.000062024075,0.000023251758,0.0010435119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041946233,0.00011661424,0.00004575388,0.00014139705,0.001428358,0.00004826477,0.00013839795,0.00023510205,0.0000027107947],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005927127,0.0023984192,0.859888,0.000262084,0.0007006357,0.0022670696,0.1002978,0.00005203657,0.00008585014,0.021475414,0.0034901972,0.008489755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010935625,0.00090197776,0.7332803,0.00016270457,0.00020979057,0.00083587883,0.2578032,0.000013154498,0.000092758506,0.004035605,0.0011197015,0.00045136837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00254068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00795014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15750541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006706605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045376444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321368969","doi":"10.1080/17405904.2023.2179648","title":"‘New’ Dutch Civic Integration: learning ‘Spontaneous Compliance’ to address inherent difference","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Discourse Studies","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Compliance (psychology); Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.20275265558197006,"score_gpt":0.5003716655864453,"score_spread":0.2976190100044752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321368969","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5070163,0.0037094362,0.0010341041,0.30465505,0.0073330053,0.0017226519,0.00007275313,0.002133114,0.17232357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97776693,0.0011176715,0.000087081666,0.0004174521,0.0015559612,0.00007612203,0.000003753801,0.00001663136,0.01895839],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979116,0.00019678354,0.00025793712,0.00034498132,0.00053939427,0.00074933935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983655,0.0009298066,0.000032373824,0.00012936757,0.00025327282,0.00028967496],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003292421,0.00021165739,0.00040167838,0.00009539524,0.0022623218,0.000107534,0.00026494954,0.000083905594,0.00006967142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004642721,0.00016073739,0.00011159184,0.0006919069,0.0011645273,0.000112312475,0.00026996405,0.00028735324,0.0005101913],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005775383,0.000105738385,0.0013898569,0.000115261115,0.000243723,0.00027561717,0.44256437,0.000026917896,0.00015314405,0.45903936,0.036881246,0.059147004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025809844,0.00019045438,0.028779013,0.000510703,0.00008810277,0.0000050238,0.8997936,0.000027242884,0.00005714212,0.06442303,0.0053244233,0.000543126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007344705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053864727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47075063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012586178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000110426845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388125626","doi":"10.1080/17405904.2023.2273324","title":"Settler colonialism and therapeutic discourses on the past: a response to Burnett et al.’s ‘a politics of reminding’","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Discourse Studies","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Colonialism; Indigenous; Politics; Emic and etic; Identity (music); Criticism; Sociology; Agency (philosophy); Gender studies; Economic Justice; Identity politics; Anthropology; Aesthetics; Social science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06800452590700751,"score_gpt":0.4547053526653991,"score_spread":0.38670082675839157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388125626","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6293222,0.00045282862,0.0000018273166,0.3636207,0.0005330482,0.0003215699,0.00004266488,0.000035489138,0.0056696846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98658264,0.002488155,0.000021828433,0.0038053887,0.00028603713,0.000021395155,0.0000019979793,0.000015744106,0.00677681],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977551,0.00075831264,0.00022922613,0.00024523865,0.0004335571,0.00057857425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953048,0.0040670596,0.00004003389,0.00020576132,0.00021424242,0.00016810652],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020517958,0.00013988631,0.0002404678,0.000118558295,0.0039254357,0.000056575747,0.0001760163,0.000055429162,0.000024825438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005144879,0.000083430874,0.000052582647,0.0003561838,0.0021498953,0.000059975082,0.000010797096,0.00015298091,0.000047442667],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046041718,0.000065876426,0.00014932117,0.000020507423,0.00003190204,0.000004030137,0.332329,7.57652e-7,0.000011863586,0.65564585,0.011664262,0.00003061777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019797549,0.00034547216,0.013853332,0.00023089856,0.0000831296,0.0000017890949,0.36567974,0.0000031763884,0.000080779944,0.04166577,0.57761586,0.00024207626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016052988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015032241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61398005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008780398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014070909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}