{"meta":{"query_hash":"488d096fb1ad","filters":{"venue":"Critical Discourse Studies"},"cohort_total":7,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"exported":7,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/488d096fb1ad","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Critical+Discourse+Studies"},"results":[{"id":"W2011915667","doi":"10.1080/17405904.2011.637685","title":"European parliaments under scrutiny: discourse strategies and interaction practices","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Discourse Studies","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Political science; Critical discourse analysis; Discourse analysis; Sociology; Linguistics; Law; Ideology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2415652680950774,"score_gpt":0.4878597289372961,"score_spread":0.24629446084221873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011915667","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53170645,0.0065523675,0.0143960025,0.050234783,0.0008202846,0.00017225281,0.000103771774,0.00013489112,0.39587927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901337,0.00032898108,0.001016554,0.0011232985,0.00012898142,0.00006561406,0.000029538889,0.000068522306,0.007104792],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.88880086,0.08902287,0.0023088995,0.005126381,0.008091241,0.006649748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82172495,0.15988533,0.005342832,0.0042058188,0.005321761,0.0035193854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.053678576,0.0007749164,0.001203138,0.009203585,0.032576427,0.038073637,0.0032015594,0.0129411165,0.008516398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14556961,0.00106946,0.0006844214,0.009750113,0.029975438,0.018986551,0.019925684,0.008308688,0.0008603016],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011597664,0.000039062445,0.002306569,0.00012222701,0.00003764144,0.00058514794,0.69464695,0.00016545689,0.00047592906,0.2784795,0.004296429,0.018729163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000690428,0.000070428585,0.0068483623,0.00095377566,0.00009110347,0.00035660138,0.5865598,0.0012138641,0.0018572962,0.15903296,0.24286692,0.00007994239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008795048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005517978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053678576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013290148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010982592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2838828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2734529596","doi":"10.1080/17405904.2017.1352002","title":"The strategic ritual of emotionality in Chinese and Australian hard news: a corpus-based study","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Discourse Studies","topic":"Media Studies and Communication","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Macquarie University","keywords":"Feeling; Construct (python library); Sociology; Context (archaeology); Face (sociological concept); Competition (biology); Media studies; Power (physics); Order (exchange); Public relations; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Social science; History","score_opus":0.1835186246069062,"score_gpt":0.4948764277654411,"score_spread":0.3113578031585349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2734529596","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9897294,0.00038120235,0.00039706458,0.0003420817,0.00004304018,0.0000814244,0.00017822553,0.0000061571327,0.008841368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99599165,0.00041268725,0.00051877473,0.00014013899,0.00005394144,0.0001605761,0.0002679224,0.000019230845,0.0024351208],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972904,0.0012433975,0.00021032488,0.00032495704,0.0006067414,0.00032414083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9814803,0.01225288,0.0023823823,0.0010553072,0.0020900865,0.00073907286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047618235,0.00048775226,0.00054361497,0.0049881143,0.006063215,0.0035369985,0.0007929032,0.00068120094,0.0025306996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016007239,0.00032664064,0.00021205534,0.006737598,0.0058614276,0.0027524529,0.00388301,0.0015920412,0.00026999324],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000659315,0.000052720803,0.019294947,0.0003366483,0.000013762977,0.00068101863,0.96562475,0.000021392048,0.0020753928,0.0020859013,0.0008552039,0.008892375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017656555,0.0000904467,0.26299906,0.00026067163,0.00007519972,0.00072667206,0.6981014,0.00040504098,0.0019258814,0.00074757356,0.034576654,0.000073710355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05388288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.079303466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05388288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035075876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003040456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.107138455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280553537","doi":"10.1080/17405904.2022.2072920","title":"Recovery rhetoric: a critical discourse analysis of substance use recovery","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Discourse Studies","topic":"Mental Health and Patient Involvement","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Oppression; Sociology; Rhetoric; Biopower; Critical discourse analysis; Discourse analysis; Power (physics); Empowerment; Intersectionality; Interpretation (philosophy); Neoliberalism (international relations); Gender studies; Political science; Politics; Social science; Law; Ideology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.35202172202034654,"score_gpt":0.5298737558067884,"score_spread":0.17785203378644188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280553537","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.528648,0.008544701,0.055935618,0.06321706,0.0011144705,0.0013887743,0.0004961262,0.00022199407,0.34043336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790444,0.001398909,0.008404363,0.0011070619,0.00011757586,0.00031908113,0.00011658281,0.0000960584,0.009395961],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886572,0.008386088,0.0002504306,0.0005042754,0.0013454758,0.00085658085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96843183,0.027070614,0.0010982275,0.00069089513,0.0020847393,0.000623644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017717453,0.0009395361,0.0006889359,0.010391457,0.021821862,0.013354739,0.0024118642,0.0035777362,0.004002363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020554228,0.00036621565,0.0005062037,0.006263702,0.05008308,0.0144923655,0.007821948,0.005238079,0.00034217027],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002420492,0.000020502423,0.00021969235,0.00010957796,0.0000020931268,0.00024597504,0.83562,0.00005772018,0.0003081116,0.15699208,0.0012089616,0.00519104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000119091455,0.000018209048,0.0005166606,0.00052035396,0.000008271376,0.0001649538,0.8955633,0.0004939634,0.0008304526,0.03852879,0.06332538,0.000017755408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029639617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025203107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029639617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021287253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01621055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1544506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293084307","doi":"10.1080/17405904.2022.2087702","title":"An ideological square analysis of the podcast discourse in “Chinese Dreams” of the BBC World Service","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Discourse Studies","topic":"Radio, Podcasts, and Digital Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Sociology; Discourse analysis; China; Critical discourse analysis; Narrative; Media studies; Gender studies; Politics; Linguistics; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05156717200208051,"score_gpt":0.42809050436090745,"score_spread":0.37652333235882696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293084307","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9696464,0.00028910712,0.0033950785,0.0008075828,0.000058117243,0.00014298716,0.00021601991,0.000016232565,0.025428444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99628,0.00014062184,0.0012976038,0.000045517023,0.000017917864,0.00011099602,0.0001376464,0.000014842522,0.0019547425],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783546,0.0013253264,0.00009896688,0.00015222268,0.00032340904,0.00026464005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98911834,0.008746753,0.00061532826,0.00040137413,0.0008660009,0.00025220445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055860328,0.00047340302,0.00031882463,0.006390437,0.006910082,0.0045747613,0.0006031653,0.0006367405,0.0022657036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009734992,0.00022919486,0.00025963507,0.0056099272,0.008844867,0.003410397,0.003962148,0.001324092,0.0001542148],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000673476,0.00001837918,0.0048611653,0.00009255157,0.0000042305383,0.00023745115,0.9617173,0.00005235092,0.0008677654,0.022617884,0.0005179915,0.008945614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072625107,0.000021741382,0.016674269,0.000114418406,0.000010786644,0.00008959204,0.9642646,0.0007253091,0.0010147606,0.0033342096,0.013726818,0.000016262746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022454992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022758339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022454992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060814554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032616914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044648528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311298579","doi":"10.1080/17405904.2022.2152063","title":"Unfit and cast aside: portrayals of mothering with intellectual disability in Québec court reports","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Discourse Studies","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University; McGill University; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual disability; Scholarship; Critical discourse analysis; Ideology; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Aside; Injustice; Power (physics); Discourse analysis; Disability studies; Gender studies; Political science; Psychology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.0470788422940813,"score_gpt":0.3833986682748937,"score_spread":0.33631982598081245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311298579","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9800377,0.0011874434,0.00046096658,0.006147203,0.00005734822,0.000033801814,0.00020888791,0.000017256276,0.011849372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968893,0.00068903,0.00015450639,0.0003182157,0.000017114573,0.000015769436,0.000054594806,0.000010780837,0.0018506441],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949529,0.0026640426,0.00020282366,0.00023008899,0.0012859798,0.00066426053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9785609,0.013877209,0.003573899,0.00058054517,0.0024967736,0.0009106166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061249114,0.0006668046,0.00037152867,0.0049560447,0.015791407,0.008074531,0.0018235814,0.0018250229,0.0030104136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01979143,0.00036778758,0.0002181913,0.0043172515,0.0143169165,0.0021566008,0.0042391247,0.0024225484,0.00018846363],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001582547,0.0000050733274,0.005587464,0.00004116234,0.0000037454063,0.00078461954,0.9875803,0.000027601636,0.00033205035,0.0019348154,0.0009496419,0.002737595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014235279,0.0000074390746,0.008972944,0.00017473612,0.0000056605268,0.0002761079,0.9785782,0.000095851734,0.00022383258,0.00020146172,0.011441696,0.000020688569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85225725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88912916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14774275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042709894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018738108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30988342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321368969","doi":"10.1080/17405904.2023.2179648","title":"‘New’ Dutch Civic Integration: learning ‘Spontaneous Compliance’ to address inherent difference","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Discourse Studies","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Compliance (psychology); Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.20275265558197006,"score_gpt":0.5003716655864453,"score_spread":0.2976190100044752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321368969","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56256455,0.0032075546,0.04759659,0.042773046,0.00069011067,0.00036534172,0.0001342741,0.000145385,0.34252322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98779374,0.00032890955,0.0032459146,0.00046865677,0.000042052307,0.00009027494,0.00004971791,0.00007325769,0.007907498],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9827976,0.013502445,0.00034364918,0.0009714526,0.0016120137,0.0007728517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98951375,0.007058697,0.00089587853,0.0009776413,0.0009989408,0.0005550321],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015607527,0.00048441533,0.0004652794,0.0012584325,0.008661152,0.010332461,0.0019022432,0.0025441877,0.003425983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022652477,0.00032776236,0.00028465144,0.0016234561,0.028116649,0.011497316,0.007484682,0.0039302236,0.00036293294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000391841,0.00004680625,0.0011694408,0.00017498521,0.000009780099,0.0003438884,0.71219134,0.00032275627,0.000893049,0.26275557,0.003136347,0.018916804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030105912,0.000051080624,0.002317357,0.0004158391,0.000014090925,0.00019468086,0.4933569,0.0015498548,0.0020438358,0.09221526,0.4077725,0.00003840087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015082386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022412123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015607527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014896563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007925346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10808265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388125626","doi":"10.1080/17405904.2023.2273324","title":"Settler colonialism and therapeutic discourses on the past: a response to Burnett et al.’s ‘a politics of reminding’","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Discourse Studies","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Colonialism; Indigenous; Politics; Emic and etic; Identity (music); Criticism; Sociology; Agency (philosophy); Gender studies; Economic Justice; Identity politics; Anthropology; Aesthetics; Social science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06800452590700751,"score_gpt":0.4547053526653991,"score_spread":0.38670082675839157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388125626","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08361133,0.026419505,0.0028445884,0.84294724,0.0058044763,0.000071915805,0.00005220856,0.000053246404,0.03819552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80227906,0.011714587,0.0019652834,0.16965221,0.0040961313,0.00027281916,0.00003422002,0.00021806704,0.009767622],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96752787,0.02525418,0.00054106896,0.0019659216,0.0021960838,0.0025148767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95808464,0.03415082,0.0021201505,0.0012669077,0.0021039478,0.002273555],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029691368,0.001196493,0.0013771298,0.004330406,0.040438376,0.02659554,0.0056398707,0.022851713,0.005020626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030273864,0.001065324,0.0009088597,0.0044580535,0.119116515,0.024830807,0.02395473,0.029913548,0.00053919124],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012223555,0.000025291349,0.00021966078,0.000092661314,0.0000049948594,0.00040546278,0.90104187,0.00001759633,0.00007433294,0.08760448,0.008327625,0.0021738438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017265176,0.000016261647,0.0003968687,0.0006621247,0.000008568632,0.00040511385,0.8706115,0.000070105445,0.00012619907,0.01955864,0.10810181,0.000025565381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020147998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03954848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95956165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014580701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009712598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15702486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}