{"meta":{"query_hash":"807e0d4d28ec","filters":{"venue":"Critical Social Policy"},"cohort_total":44,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":44,"exported":44,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/807e0d4d28ec","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Critical+Social+Policy"},"results":[{"id":"W1981984526","doi":"10.1177/0261018306062592","title":"Collaborate with caution: protecting children, helping mothers","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Policy","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Context (archaeology); Invisibility; Child protection; Psychological intervention; Criminology; Poison control; Subjectivity; Psychology; Suicide prevention; Political science; Social psychology; Medicine; Environmental health; Law; Psychiatry; Geography","score_opus":0.018639087962412173,"score_gpt":0.3490448854640118,"score_spread":0.33040579750159965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981984526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27158472,0.00012679878,0.0033998564,0.020468388,0.00025254727,0.0008899403,0.00004703832,0.0005670928,0.7026636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99447066,0.000003807518,0.00036456302,0.0006945734,0.004034963,0.00003263718,0.0000029506225,0.000016826232,0.0003789986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984875,0.0002088987,0.0001566308,0.00020970288,0.0003266852,0.00061063375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995332,0.00006783771,0.000034665452,0.000068422276,0.00019447606,0.000101436846],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037566328,0.00011493082,0.00014560025,0.000057064277,0.0023309484,0.00018544345,0.00014613065,0.00012259808,0.000058132817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004034957,0.00010941608,0.000045862285,0.00073176704,0.0009690526,0.00017547302,0.000023296108,0.0001996436,0.00006288487],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014232477,0.000048848273,0.001576436,0.000011917339,0.000007669669,0.000005730736,0.0031128577,0.000009027302,0.00017227887,0.9925123,0.00098887,0.001539858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030350133,0.00046340795,0.63614804,0.00044918837,0.00020644577,0.000033469463,0.042228825,0.00030376468,0.002743986,0.25846848,0.052680913,0.0032384838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023364684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030031748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7340438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020686458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004139985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029204607","doi":"10.1177/0261018314564036","title":"When rights need to be (re)claimed: Austerity measures, neoliberal housing policies and anti-eviction activism in Spain","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Policy","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Windsor; McGill University","keywords":"Fair Housing Act; Eviction; Austerity; Politics; Law; Constitutionality; Political science; Sociology; Supreme court","score_opus":0.08349237693746235,"score_gpt":0.30256871018448245,"score_spread":0.21907633324702008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029204607","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9143891,0.00024233232,0.0011916311,0.061383035,0.00040605583,0.00025270286,0.000097085845,0.00009958462,0.021938516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98919,0.00002084618,0.00051141717,0.008235882,0.0016948305,0.000017574539,0.0000066887774,0.00003893863,0.0002838651],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981157,0.00008275662,0.00051262067,0.00044977776,0.000106034975,0.0007330899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992378,0.00006016714,0.000090106994,0.00018395904,0.00006559275,0.0003623895],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005485313,0.00024926578,0.000605798,0.0004617813,0.00028708627,0.00021113892,0.00017022081,0.00027689588,0.000025678952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024838749,0.00029689685,0.00009209908,0.000455367,0.0002969582,0.00042776656,0.0001226118,0.00029156206,0.000057568526],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010173722,0.00030610888,0.0043619936,0.000067061876,0.00003470811,0.00003962287,0.04233387,0.000017631695,0.00021383502,0.9324411,0.015378524,0.0047038062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021965378,0.0001935634,0.049046695,0.00006389947,0.00002141443,0.000018790379,0.00069025025,0.00046079734,0.00022824963,0.30577442,0.64016414,0.0011412803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052485432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002113554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62666667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039885318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007993444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029280728","doi":"10.1177/0261018309341904","title":"Removing barriers to work: Building economic security for people with psychiatric disabilities","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Policy","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Restructuring; Social security; Citizenship; Mental health; Work (physics); Welfare; Psychiatry; Psychology; Economic growth; Sociology; Political science; Business; Economics; Politics; Finance","score_opus":0.033576657442989453,"score_gpt":0.43809387988916054,"score_spread":0.4045172224461711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029280728","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7272722,0.00005261278,0.00042950173,0.26230112,0.00039790213,0.0007862168,0.00006421984,0.00015289665,0.008543307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98694646,0.0000049834666,0.000627473,0.0067892303,0.0051334407,0.00016297534,0.000003653074,0.000024243522,0.00030755054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982901,0.00011522,0.0003247733,0.00028595206,0.00011124506,0.00087270734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986832,0.0007067364,0.00003806481,0.00012703206,0.00008220908,0.0003627245],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002843547,0.00017250695,0.00035065325,0.00009240952,0.0026397214,0.00002544825,0.00014129994,0.00013553593,0.00013186177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022238696,0.00015320478,0.0001072547,0.00024867585,0.00013002798,0.00010739219,0.00006793529,0.00025146097,0.00004054075],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020063677,0.00003385152,0.041987006,0.00017024063,0.000021646127,3.294729e-7,0.02738287,0.0000016344625,0.0000044898698,0.87262267,0.0558785,0.0016961319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021687618,0.0007974764,0.24323891,0.0002293006,0.00016491629,9.918489e-7,0.052292794,0.000024513474,0.000010421447,0.6185781,0.081427686,0.0010661542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009030717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039386557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25967422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005294384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003423586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030451390","doi":"10.1177/026101830102100104","title":"Whose social economy? Debating new state practices in Qu¥ebec","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Policy","topic":"Agriculture and Rural Development Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Leverage (statistics); State (computer science); Globalization; Political economy; Political science; Economic system; Scale (ratio); Social economy; Social democracy; Economics; Politics; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.06792616444618337,"score_gpt":0.37047322840853913,"score_spread":0.30254706396235576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030451390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67741543,0.000078107965,0.0000036429071,0.28183055,0.000045877725,0.0001762694,0.000007475709,0.00007152136,0.040371165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901646,0.00005567519,0.0000432394,0.0017988838,0.0045334734,0.00001529936,0.000027036718,0.0000016220745,0.003360199],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833286,0.0001357127,0.00028573853,0.00029508892,0.00022688048,0.00072371186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992796,0.00031828528,0.00008556752,0.000021441629,0.00008209331,0.00021300884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002564531,0.00016047542,0.00022342663,0.000025250136,0.0006068156,0.00022004588,0.00026628902,0.00016245159,0.0006573567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082258,0.00006583052,0.00009801965,0.0006979153,0.0001449317,0.00039107763,0.0001274086,0.0003230109,0.00023365083],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010356055,0.0003432619,0.01125661,0.00002953916,0.000028599781,0.000107681975,0.0031000918,4.5012712e-7,0.0092460625,0.07355212,0.06871834,0.8335137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003004914,0.000116695504,0.6615457,0.000018123003,0.000008534098,0.000014174167,0.0017996061,0.000011778882,0.00019780837,0.07472557,0.2608233,0.00043820625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013595402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004478129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83307546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014124448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010880723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99297315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034791017","doi":"10.1177/0261018304039679","title":"Pro-Market, Non-Market: The Dual Nature of Organizational Change in Social Services Delivery","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Policy","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":126,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Restructuring; Deskilling; Social Welfare; Welfare state; Business; Public sector; Social work; Market economy; Public relations; Marketing; Economics; Work (physics); Economic growth; Political science; Economy; Finance","score_opus":0.041962732391698634,"score_gpt":0.4066722572554525,"score_spread":0.36470952486375385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034791017","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27483237,0.00019996148,0.000008355838,0.6763263,0.00033364308,0.00044226545,0.0000731184,0.000063540574,0.047720462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838138,0.00007791212,0.000034501158,0.009168448,0.0067410963,0.00003128419,0.000008924801,0.000015613843,0.00010838118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821556,0.00026929425,0.0003059697,0.00018723894,0.00056485814,0.0004570533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990726,0.00021677182,0.000066133165,0.000066620734,0.0004886859,0.0000892057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007380342,0.000117285024,0.00019487299,0.000116939904,0.0009880976,0.00005178575,0.0002674011,0.00046937732,0.00034069762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006894262,0.0001038643,0.00006409553,0.0012313665,0.0007021329,0.00020394704,0.000069904345,0.00044936215,0.000012273991],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020579784,0.00013655845,0.00086773414,0.00011959552,0.000009127669,0.000005137095,0.04897392,5.3530865e-8,0.000017768962,0.9452717,0.0010055738,0.0035722705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002102855,0.00012802788,0.48973075,0.00028035545,0.000041053216,0.0000044336434,0.0935322,0.000040725743,0.00013332324,0.29237932,0.12075433,0.0008726285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005593691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006598677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70898145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002790422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088922284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8456025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040905936","doi":"10.1177/0261018305054073","title":"Reconsidering sustainability: some implications for community-based crime prevention","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Policy","topic":"Community Health and Development","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Crime prevention; Sustainability; Situational ethics; Social sustainability; Inclusion (mineral); Flexibility (engineering); Sustainable development; Criminology; Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Economics; Social science; Management","score_opus":0.3124283423228642,"score_gpt":0.559946424315102,"score_spread":0.2475180819922378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040905936","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11689957,0.00008002207,0.009617898,0.8634645,0.00024633782,0.0029464457,0.00012536002,0.0003991092,0.006220769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94923997,0.0000058950222,0.0047824755,0.04132858,0.002413027,0.0014940937,0.00010443367,0.000034579447,0.0005969485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996926,0.0013103334,0.00061792985,0.00015547505,0.000102501916,0.00088772917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952898,0.0033276195,0.000078456396,0.00038357708,0.000602572,0.00031794602],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015037635,0.00014423639,0.00027257166,0.0001504092,0.0063704676,0.000021101247,0.00023557588,0.00025328278,0.00009128134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007017383,0.00016102793,0.00012932926,0.00022558348,0.0002145086,0.00017543715,0.00015954164,0.0010276482,0.00006807414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009250426,0.0005985189,0.000979052,0.002069209,0.000014161678,1.9673429e-7,0.010860747,0.0000025663437,0.000049113456,0.87837017,0.021261565,0.08570221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011208786,0.00009752825,0.034310136,0.00006931415,0.000024374498,6.4313946e-7,0.0056001507,0.000052230156,0.000025862728,0.71463895,0.24383591,0.00022405012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00080526504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052139646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8323404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001502593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036723197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9949231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048786900","doi":"10.1177/0261018306068474","title":"Lesbian and gay health issues: OUTside of Canada’s health policy","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Policy","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Citizenship; Lesbian; Heterosexuality; Ideology; Gender studies; Visibility; Inclusion (mineral); Reproductive health; Sociology; Homosexuality; Health care; Human sexuality; Political science; Politics; Law; Population; Geography","score_opus":0.04308365620648285,"score_gpt":0.46391006302452226,"score_spread":0.4208264068180394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048786900","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017127227,0.0030717063,0.000040555035,0.8897162,0.000555936,0.00033794568,0.00046194004,0.0000816307,0.08860687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9438734,0.00018778638,0.00010345591,0.032238256,0.012236346,0.00001571218,0.000028151764,0.000055910055,0.011260973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963183,0.0004998772,0.00082591857,0.00040531074,0.0003842325,0.00156637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985036,0.0001661162,0.00018025932,0.00029568208,0.00011759946,0.0007366928],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046913052,0.0002604739,0.00066596904,0.00028483788,0.0008166484,0.000047693455,0.00023179129,0.00021078408,0.00013530506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004638829,0.0002851865,0.000106212625,0.00045725665,0.00070387404,0.00007732642,0.00007546893,0.0003510023,0.000036681173],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001336606,0.0001287792,0.0022790795,0.00060956203,0.000012122005,0.000006530413,0.0015364612,1.306006e-7,0.0000027122003,0.65358984,0.3353474,0.0064739757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013584645,0.00040605053,0.6024431,0.00004423663,0.000027170088,0.000053535885,0.0010488626,0.0000032463324,0.0000051839525,0.14651513,0.2475559,0.0005391132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99807686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8675283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9267462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010127515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008986579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056578098","doi":"10.1177/0261018307087990","title":"Good, bad, thwarted or addicted? Discourses of substance-using mothers","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Policy","topic":"Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects","field":"Medicine","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"British Columbia Centre of Excellence for Women's Health","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Substance use; Focus group; Psychology; Social psychology; Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Psychiatry; Law","score_opus":0.042625430403534684,"score_gpt":0.3584973765485178,"score_spread":0.31587194614498315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056578098","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904507,0.0004223822,0.0004960732,0.003807039,0.00017407654,0.00031169908,0.00009442723,0.00013497626,0.0041086636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99626344,0.000029824185,0.00078787695,0.00069434376,0.001795596,0.000011404623,0.000013053348,0.000048970767,0.00035545925],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830246,0.00009539121,0.00033663676,0.00025545465,0.0004495329,0.0005605052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990309,0.0002681502,0.00006104087,0.00021334892,0.00015735801,0.00026921564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000100308505,0.00020615007,0.000520865,0.00011612645,0.00022316181,0.000008802043,0.00013102594,0.00019445016,0.0003000825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001191847,0.00016930947,0.00018060005,0.00063368166,0.0011576473,0.00014723183,0.000022427601,0.00025754303,0.000023223347],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0095933,0.0058602723,0.041277785,0.0028920735,0.0015277561,0.0054577105,0.058783162,0.000019282921,0.51583564,0.26464978,0.054392394,0.03971082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.027757643,0.0046037673,0.67416286,0.002713686,0.0018882576,0.002537744,0.006187128,0.0015628892,0.23625432,0.016717168,0.021760913,0.0038536254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032509663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005791903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6328851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001991515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042403003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69042397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063986905","doi":"10.1177/0261018311430456","title":"The contradictions of individualized activation policy: Explaining the rise and demise of One to One Service in Australia","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Policy","topic":"Youth Education and Societal Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Demise; Agency (philosophy); Bureaucracy; Welfare; Sociology; Democracy; Public administration; Service delivery framework; Service (business); Political science; Political economy; Politics; Economics; Law; Social science; Economy","score_opus":0.1201393181764027,"score_gpt":0.4434239056087502,"score_spread":0.3232845874323475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063986905","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86083615,0.00004138778,0.00009555154,0.13444373,0.000098965655,0.00026492748,0.000033237488,0.0000136821145,0.0041723824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99781317,0.000028755001,0.00013869531,0.0009118579,0.000949131,0.000029071372,0.0000017153392,0.000006114514,0.0001214649],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870723,0.00033030254,0.00025028075,0.000076604505,0.00027547323,0.00036012672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987785,0.0007573076,0.00006504325,0.00008047101,0.00015154787,0.00016712476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009671723,0.000064582986,0.0001487064,0.00006448973,0.00072891946,0.000043311844,0.00016704002,0.00011670486,0.00001929543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039262213,0.00005324055,0.000043790616,0.0008264382,0.0007149311,0.00016276664,0.000040742245,0.00015486825,0.000003193629],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010571671,0.00010534599,0.0025485258,0.0000122877045,0.000012377433,1.0525059e-8,0.17861515,5.9543106e-7,0.00020366126,0.8165137,0.0001012511,0.001876514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008542081,0.00004408058,0.7461656,0.000081679995,0.00008462557,3.420313e-7,0.1544922,0.000039509876,0.00020547413,0.08257414,0.015198905,0.0002592473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03164135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014611097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74361706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013654487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029271678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.974807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085485043","doi":"10.1177/0261018309358292","title":"Lone motherhood, welfare reform and active citizen subjectivity","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Subjectivity; Welfare reform; Citizenship; Welfare; Sociology; Gender studies; Poverty; Reproduction; Qualitative research; Political science; Law; Politics; Social science","score_opus":0.020678742008307167,"score_gpt":0.37801198716347434,"score_spread":0.3573332451551672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085485043","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38782224,0.000025190726,0.000008093325,0.239877,0.00047319528,0.00022630955,0.000072583265,0.00019289962,0.3713025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876518,0.000061560444,0.000049485923,0.0012080658,0.010235028,0.000027995731,0.0000017863676,0.000022099592,0.00074213796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982874,0.00014969196,0.00017351276,0.00027143033,0.0003532664,0.0007647164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925715,0.00013628825,0.00004287868,0.00010439317,0.00015517237,0.0003041239],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003897859,0.00017671008,0.00029798725,0.0000859186,0.003806084,0.00011084316,0.00019457363,0.00039455603,0.00009978629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026143342,0.00015446445,0.00012621461,0.00040342697,0.00327232,0.00026994795,0.00013173782,0.00054574234,0.000028151175],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019922554,0.000061914056,0.00014969966,0.000014116336,0.000026311358,0.0000034999184,0.022165742,2.513621e-9,0.00020838677,0.9401407,0.00021239422,0.03699727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070896535,0.00008207342,0.1644929,0.000011193345,0.00006146082,0.0000052328737,0.053169373,0.0000019804688,0.00039613826,0.7490369,0.03139018,0.0006436034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06850483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011410906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5998296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024299121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023243506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090369555","doi":"10.1177/0261018307087984","title":"Precautionary tales: Exploring the obstacles to debating the primary prevention of breast cancer","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Policy","topic":"Global Cancer Incidence and Screening","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Viewpoints; Breast cancer; Narrative; Ideology; Categorization; Public relations; Precautionary principle; Qualitative research; Government (linguistics); Custodians; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Politics; Medicine; Cancer; Epistemology; Social science; Law; History","score_opus":0.18895002111927411,"score_gpt":0.4178172946762347,"score_spread":0.22886727355696057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090369555","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93809754,0.0003782657,0.0002571074,0.05803832,0.00010368582,0.00025537706,0.0000322879,0.0000326119,0.0028047874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940914,0.00006527946,0.00020272331,0.0032035431,0.0021499533,0.00010818935,0.0000033770762,0.00001042926,0.0001650985],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989831,0.00006320961,0.00021566144,0.00012889526,0.00034880647,0.000260363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946827,0.00014353635,0.000032413733,0.00011483535,0.00015355142,0.00008738016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015890536,0.00008517655,0.00016392059,0.000031189382,0.0005054573,0.00001050145,0.00012290938,0.00004081213,0.000039477858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048321913,0.000053256674,0.00011671423,0.0003130523,0.0003781179,0.00012310037,0.000076510914,0.00015958658,0.000007529487],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001338779,0.0006743681,0.057686023,0.0009509808,0.00035928848,0.00011696027,0.054301083,0.00013434986,0.021035708,0.21523169,0.024729716,0.62344104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002419341,0.000086515225,0.9925619,0.0002656333,0.00007066678,0.00013242384,0.0021478971,0.000022393198,0.0004248919,0.0024288213,0.0015188145,0.00009811417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016648072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003146666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93487585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019564395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034712852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38876197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098275175","doi":"10.1177/0261018311415571","title":"Neoliberal restructuring, limited autonomy, and relational distance in Manitoba’s nonprofit field","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Policy","topic":"Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Manitoba","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Restructuring; Autonomy; Field (mathematics); Social work; Sociology; Accountability; Public relations; Service (business); Public administration; Neoliberalism (international relations); Service provider; Political science; Business; Political economy; Marketing; Law","score_opus":0.06893724803070221,"score_gpt":0.3400163490347612,"score_spread":0.27107910100405896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098275175","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8741416,0.00006528704,0.0003273625,0.008310208,0.0002819599,0.00017196998,0.000009506149,0.00010113911,0.11659096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99633807,0.000007871559,0.0007862479,0.00071822864,0.0016696061,0.000014894613,0.0000016671286,0.000011935463,0.00045145792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988562,0.000099741395,0.000194293,0.00021110859,0.00018527177,0.00045341262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955153,0.00016190136,0.00002362389,0.00006870034,0.000043859047,0.00015036545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019448064,0.000103117396,0.00014201026,0.000084608786,0.00045443256,0.000051736613,0.00012153521,0.00017901963,0.00018520452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008378549,0.00011542475,0.000045775436,0.00023483211,0.00047426685,0.00024018175,0.00006020981,0.00025416107,0.000012807195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023454384,0.000021967187,0.05010356,0.00001515933,0.0000037556576,0.000012487339,0.019591723,5.9532503e-8,0.000021150008,0.92681575,0.00015144795,0.0032394954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026211786,0.000034547476,0.7930899,0.000024370496,0.0000075125927,0.0000018443484,0.0018255388,0.000027121743,0.000069294954,0.19733329,0.007095009,0.0002294271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058354363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011040515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7429864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023183823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002344943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94791615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103056863","doi":"10.1177/0261018310396040","title":"Bridging sustainability and the social economy: Achieving community transformation through local food initiatives","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Policy","topic":"Organic Food and Agriculture","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":130,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Sustainability; Social sustainability; Mainstream; Social equality; Social economy; Equity (law); Economic system; Externality; Social change; Sustainable development; Economic growth; Economics; Business; Political science; Market economy","score_opus":0.03924048778881255,"score_gpt":0.285737729960223,"score_spread":0.24649724217141045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103056863","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8673753,0.000054333766,0.0001576936,0.112306975,0.000026985472,0.00024944523,0.000038972667,0.00008177667,0.019708527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997234,0.000006361356,0.000006505278,0.0015844369,0.0011354353,0.000014677024,0.000012337515,0.0000010825656,0.0000051753404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873847,0.0005183337,0.00020251363,0.0001270317,0.00008528703,0.00032836015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994979,0.00027948752,0.000037451657,0.00002759972,0.000098392804,0.000059185757],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036059137,0.0001346342,0.0002059519,0.0000047742183,0.002300114,0.000093185874,0.00019071241,0.00013699531,0.00005433175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003206482,0.00004752463,0.00011723836,0.00021058322,0.0012365375,0.00044039017,0.00009410903,0.0004059049,0.0000031859734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007148968,0.00014414306,0.00010070311,0.000055987446,0.000023060727,5.804794e-7,0.061453868,2.9219406e-8,0.00018385248,0.8790622,0.00016743093,0.05873667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086440105,0.0004087409,0.39089417,0.000015249073,0.000062805455,0.000011036412,0.1168833,0.000025052552,0.0007658128,0.48600155,0.0036449097,0.00042296527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002238649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036441805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39306062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007612125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024662162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99899876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105285176","doi":"10.1177/0261018307072210","title":"Outdoor play spaces in Canada: The safety dance of standards as policy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Policy","topic":"Urban Green Space and Health","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Harmonization; Safety standards; Industrial policy; Business; Policy development; Economic growth; Political science; International trade; Economics; Economic policy; Engineering","score_opus":0.013146454916672141,"score_gpt":0.3341143680223616,"score_spread":0.32096791310568945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105285176","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76275593,0.00009608653,0.00018011939,0.16000335,0.00011546566,0.00026367634,0.00022021522,0.000017603483,0.076347575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939074,0.000018825991,0.00005337436,0.0049687484,0.0006974433,0.0000028563184,0.0000011520293,0.0000109531475,0.00033923457],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816245,0.00006694361,0.0002897924,0.00017830323,0.0006347541,0.0006677806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993816,0.00021369685,0.00004540064,0.00014371051,0.000019744402,0.0001958402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006794847,0.000114456125,0.00020707875,0.000040509658,0.00025241481,0.000013188415,0.00025782787,0.00007441404,0.0004105718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008606429,0.00008957056,0.000046842408,0.0005473688,0.00066883315,0.00007882799,0.00012280472,0.00022952523,0.00003170039],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023856017,0.00014795497,0.4748428,0.00006289786,0.000014313941,0.000059876358,0.008940441,0.000024072713,0.0004214564,0.44691733,0.039251767,0.029078558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031099163,0.000053876593,0.92717683,0.000013645803,0.00000624185,0.0000034144425,0.0016719986,0.000011189535,0.00015803147,0.008146623,0.0622873,0.0001598502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9906883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9875646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45233405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030418674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020843784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79543775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106525487","doi":"10.1177/0261018314545595","title":"Roma rights and Roma expulsions in France: Official discourse and EU responses","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Policy","topic":"Romani and Gypsy Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); European union; Government (linguistics); Political science; Face (sociological concept); Human rights; Law; Sociology; Public administration; Social science","score_opus":0.04615613155955831,"score_gpt":0.49152972293208924,"score_spread":0.4453735913725309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106525487","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93013614,0.00022129474,0.000040992985,0.056785505,0.00024954998,0.00024201577,0.0000445054,0.000053752043,0.012226269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99260396,0.000023296243,0.000085852706,0.00296974,0.0029742885,0.00005686001,0.0000025815368,0.000016775932,0.0012666675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998001,0.00061733415,0.00033418363,0.0002763252,0.0001604057,0.00061078713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822515,0.0013772736,0.000035865778,0.00011072687,0.00005765164,0.00019333498],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003473677,0.00015999655,0.00035982745,0.00011655418,0.001870949,0.000018427265,0.00007985774,0.00023928891,0.000057167537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025492713,0.00013283148,0.00003978081,0.00017689938,0.0006974795,0.00009983256,0.00017169058,0.000430348,0.00004876088],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015474658,0.00021339132,0.017079193,0.00024212948,0.000020958756,0.000028683307,0.026744964,5.7167753e-8,0.00026777678,0.92997444,0.019353313,0.005920339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011611283,0.00013416847,0.85071725,0.00016227418,0.000027828837,0.000002631388,0.0035433976,0.000039049082,0.000009296697,0.10325427,0.040678676,0.00027001457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009829021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8336381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000455561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010152212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99942845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112700184","doi":"10.1177/0261018314527716","title":"Governing public nuisance: Collaboration and conflict regarding the presence of homeless people in public spaces of Montreal","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Policy","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Embodied cognition; Public health; Economic Justice; Situated; Variety (cybernetics); Sociology; Public order; Order (exchange); Criminology; Political science; Public relations; Public administration; Law; Business; Medicine","score_opus":0.056311501897298034,"score_gpt":0.42184065537524873,"score_spread":0.3655291534779507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112700184","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9688772,0.0002347227,0.00012296406,0.020687355,0.0001310996,0.00028437594,0.000043112825,0.00002317758,0.00959599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987795,0.00011198984,0.000019809839,0.00010588026,0.00084803574,0.0000569224,0.000005024914,0.000014630575,0.000058223653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977104,0.0009045478,0.00044521573,0.00017173115,0.00030142893,0.00046667122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974743,0.0016817411,0.00017636422,0.00013111472,0.0004302578,0.00010620979],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009756397,0.00010894478,0.00056157046,0.00009125069,0.0006355965,0.00005168816,0.00018497797,0.000219621,0.000031153395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077683036,0.0000872834,0.00004369782,0.00070623436,0.00050132885,0.00026001738,0.00013299644,0.00031869463,0.0000032709156],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019557197,0.000057917696,0.0956761,0.00040403707,0.000010536443,3.482313e-7,0.09954478,6.0118504e-7,0.00016939126,0.7985133,0.00011525672,0.0054881973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012523955,0.00008728996,0.6347649,0.00020433977,0.000024159619,1.1211835e-7,0.33815846,0.000598404,0.000071227885,0.018224211,0.006380584,0.00023389133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014863282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028970474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78028905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000093130686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038588466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99169683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116365864","doi":"10.1177/0261018308098397","title":"(Re)Constructing women's resistance to woman abuse: Resources, strategy choice and implications of and for public policy in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Policy","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Resistance (ecology); Public policy; Domestic violence; Race (biology); Social policy; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Economics; Economic growth; Medicine; Gender studies; Environmental health","score_opus":0.039129972916342924,"score_gpt":0.37812991784645883,"score_spread":0.3389999449301159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116365864","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9049846,0.00013343903,0.000049853228,0.048074342,0.000024258183,0.0003120346,0.00009703501,0.000023520015,0.046300914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99592406,0.00003112186,0.00026814165,0.0030761713,0.00059343455,0.000038208116,0.0000011719848,0.0000068374857,0.00006086455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859154,0.000087718036,0.0002551915,0.00022641425,0.00016902259,0.0006701059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990892,0.00034802448,0.00004091729,0.00008587964,0.00012413548,0.0003118377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030045534,0.00009874672,0.00021029821,0.00013275833,0.000559586,0.00009101304,0.00017141055,0.000077769655,0.0000067820924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019898291,0.00011271152,0.000020274636,0.0006361149,0.0004599254,0.00013810652,0.000024004637,0.00010248843,3.2027722e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010580007,0.000020427502,0.0038296615,0.00003786186,0.0000031124864,5.1831444e-7,0.011034161,3.6283518e-7,0.000102571845,0.9652147,0.0005033099,0.0192427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047402194,0.00007074866,0.7849978,0.000053473323,0.000008298576,8.1021903e-7,0.047392506,0.000009034472,0.000024131761,0.13913928,0.02748315,0.00034671984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6058301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.66361094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82607543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061118096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014855282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45962423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134007102","doi":"10.1177/0261018311435025","title":"Children’s best interests and intimate partner violence in the Canadian family law and child protection systems","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Policy","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Manitoba","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Northern British Columbia","keywords":"Domestic violence; Privilege (computing); Child protection; Best interests; Family law; Service (business); Psychology; Child custody; Qualitative research; Criminology; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Sociology; Medicine; Business; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.04090610756101262,"score_gpt":0.3597317228769036,"score_spread":0.31882561531589093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134007102","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5993621,0.0013491061,0.00004507137,0.0102846185,0.00059651374,0.0012634285,0.00005760457,0.00007385367,0.3869677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944424,0.000105986444,0.000008776325,0.0032120529,0.0021254125,0.000081430655,0.0000020121038,0.000009904159,0.000012015383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998282,0.00037120486,0.00017930541,0.00018309792,0.00023034078,0.00075403135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994816,0.000064862375,0.000023481001,0.00008371691,0.000052456286,0.00029387194],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084182975,0.00012756225,0.00015563604,0.00008736546,0.0017566776,0.00032548822,0.00017093583,0.00018152928,0.0000035537862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029589765,0.0001049066,0.000028653563,0.0002425906,0.001381489,0.000325775,0.000045018987,0.00031417017,0.000032605243],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003719033,0.000036653542,0.0043844827,0.000023443277,0.0000036052575,0.0000016219907,0.00783824,1.6198348e-7,0.0000060122466,0.9855481,0.00008548915,0.002068477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034084404,0.000071699804,0.95742273,0.00035810823,0.000039082905,0.00003202457,0.011969142,0.000078875855,0.000011011185,0.017018104,0.012153217,0.00050515647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7976021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1192055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017735106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012051907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142902068","doi":"10.1177/0261018306068479","title":"Diminishing the concept of social policy: The shifting conceptual ground of social policy debate in Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Credibility; Social policy; Sociology; Scope (computer science); Political economy; Politics; Political science; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.0349149352326783,"score_gpt":0.35536770410007956,"score_spread":0.32045276886740126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142902068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4772992,0.00017915158,0.000008430867,0.45679307,0.0004624966,0.00054965087,0.0004257362,0.0000620215,0.06422023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9678424,0.000020148325,0.0000067243805,0.004721232,0.026985798,0.00003892666,0.000010474282,0.0000384349,0.00033588058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99473673,0.0010966923,0.0010246027,0.00033937758,0.0012077291,0.0015948561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99766374,0.0013171689,0.00038343848,0.00015050368,0.00035131577,0.00013385287],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010529802,0.00035273976,0.0008512484,0.00020130504,0.0047238595,0.000120491655,0.0009558825,0.0003814425,0.000038376602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048816456,0.0002577311,0.00039647528,0.0023170167,0.009963921,0.00025236682,0.0003193405,0.0006735776,0.0000029001153],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021141768,0.00006283239,0.0002300881,0.000019091227,0.000059464805,0.0000036800452,0.15599577,0.0000029492494,0.000037923026,0.83610356,0.003728499,0.0037350086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001635451,0.00007948189,0.22655287,0.000054844073,0.00022081607,0.0000024797775,0.464452,0.000026388423,0.00022566866,0.27508208,0.030680249,0.0009876706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9929079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8807088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56102145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019538745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009045104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145394657","doi":"10.1177/0261018312458487","title":"<i>Sweet Charity</i> , revisited: Organizational responses to food insecurity in Hamilton and Toronto, Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Policy","topic":"Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Laidlaw Foundation; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Retrenchment; Food security; Food insecurity; Government (linguistics); Public relations; Face (sociological concept); Food systems; Relevance (law); Sociology; Political science; Business; Economic growth; Public administration; Marketing; Economics; Agriculture; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.13110482442212315,"score_gpt":0.4636538102095968,"score_spread":0.3325489857874736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145394657","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92422247,0.00075645116,0.000021382957,0.06303427,0.0006243739,0.0007024031,0.00082861836,0.000069367314,0.009740656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748581,0.000045161563,0.00014718177,0.022087349,0.0026297795,0.000050536153,0.000038991,0.000018687138,0.00012417893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99764776,0.0005417627,0.0004535068,0.00020278142,0.00029129477,0.00086287345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984864,0.00057768804,0.00004446313,0.00012219494,0.00019042769,0.0005788079],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053386413,0.0001396502,0.00027603985,0.00008065647,0.0012817864,0.000013504219,0.000117244854,0.0002553343,0.0005470768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035843868,0.0001562206,0.000022333246,0.00040285615,0.00009846272,0.0002552714,0.0001451599,0.00045323136,0.00004224268],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006573835,0.00010886137,0.13240027,0.0003151034,0.000006562362,0.0000017709332,0.02704824,5.0650275e-8,0.000015328886,0.8154532,0.024416078,0.00016879237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056434394,0.0000880775,0.8334457,0.0001099063,0.000015637763,0.0000019198405,0.0047710193,0.000008227262,0.000006336062,0.008914842,0.15177387,0.00030011006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.65161085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7680377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80653834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001094299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013811276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9858594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149974194","doi":"10.1177/0261018314538799","title":"Lean social care and worker identity: The role of outcomes, supervision and mission","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Policy","topic":"Social Work Education and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Managerialism; Agency (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Public relations; Identity (music); Social identity theory; Outcome (game theory); Business; Public sector; Social work; Public administration; Political science; Sociology; Economic growth; Economics; Psychology; Social group; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.031465635406524944,"score_gpt":0.4273962840800656,"score_spread":0.39593064867354066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149974194","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49104616,0.0011453088,0.00006516895,0.37684953,0.00047042186,0.00028782457,0.000013020288,0.0000755098,0.13004707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99605197,0.00005510644,0.000057573932,0.0016051047,0.0018677292,0.0000035870285,0.0000020584448,0.000010063809,0.00034683757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985972,0.0004595572,0.00016484775,0.00015290924,0.00035235434,0.00027309905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988009,0.0007940779,0.000047273337,0.00006503667,0.00015092621,0.0001418018],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006554559,0.0000898296,0.0001777503,0.00004009915,0.0028231575,0.00015859766,0.00015387333,0.00017536944,0.00015995387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004048129,0.000073477764,0.00007032771,0.00035954738,0.0010556495,0.0002563673,0.00008589385,0.00018927926,0.000014228365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071904433,0.000025379779,0.0055137402,0.00001034615,0.0000061703563,9.966878e-8,0.05978235,6.8249615e-9,0.000026182533,0.81579375,0.001041229,0.117793575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024539357,0.000025716938,0.09522678,0.000009387457,0.00005874172,4.08591e-7,0.14571454,0.000003781419,0.00001595461,0.24751104,0.5110305,0.00015776156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004530194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040685458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56828266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005662513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001526611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152550264","doi":"10.1177/0261018304044364","title":"Women and Violence: The Effects of Dismantling the Welfare State","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Policy","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; State (computer science); Citizenship; Racism; Welfare state; Social Welfare; Welfare; Social policy; Domestic violence; Political science; Sociology; Sexual violence; Social issues; Gender studies; Poison control; Political economy; Criminology; Suicide prevention; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.013872625697960493,"score_gpt":0.3472060522405476,"score_spread":0.33333342654258713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152550264","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95002073,0.0003804158,0.0001555744,0.03012327,0.0002680131,0.00031693597,0.0000139288395,0.000050313687,0.018670809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979419,0.000260866,0.000011619603,0.0010772535,0.00064054475,0.000030278345,2.477522e-7,0.0000070048486,0.00003025627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882746,0.00017500456,0.00013681668,0.00012225939,0.00026786613,0.00047057658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999373,0.0003494251,0.000026815544,0.000088220106,0.0000693565,0.00009313759],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004537286,0.00008218623,0.00012818801,0.000021213158,0.0017278458,0.00007754954,0.0002589265,0.00006103974,0.000010455712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013843677,0.00004939134,0.000048655747,0.00024262104,0.0023440649,0.000082647195,0.00007741472,0.00016087164,0.000008738842],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005883284,0.000024604371,0.00007487597,0.000048149206,0.0000064907026,0.00000233312,0.048312258,0.0000011941949,0.00008843218,0.9376777,0.00002582987,0.0137322685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003948273,0.00008981375,0.07568074,0.000119817436,0.000024011404,0.0000012437558,0.027192235,0.00000807124,0.0002893593,0.8920283,0.0039642365,0.0002073636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047094347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028382086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07560587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000096029595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013645928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169884127","doi":"10.1177/0261018311410529","title":"Making ‘care’ accessible: Personal assistance for disabled people and the politics of language","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Policy","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Politics; Transformative learning; Sociology; Disabled people; Disability studies; Public relations; Health care; Political science; Law; Gender studies; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.15110057442716782,"score_gpt":0.4770818836987734,"score_spread":0.3259813092716056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169884127","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38035235,0.0016033027,0.0011982365,0.4330862,0.00044689758,0.0008550197,0.00022412179,0.00013238065,0.18210152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965588,0.000030221498,0.0002696002,0.0015533147,0.0013290554,0.000029435168,0.0000017570138,0.000008379672,0.00021944416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990086,0.00015931952,0.00018139555,0.00011259874,0.0002006849,0.00033740554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918246,0.0004001544,0.000045414636,0.000053025782,0.00024642312,0.000072505936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041966385,0.00006528131,0.00016688961,0.000035039226,0.0008884883,0.000041734278,0.0001450453,0.00010506549,0.00006958823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020931605,0.000052086736,0.000059324768,0.00023697421,0.0011593284,0.00008548983,0.000031924854,0.00009829334,0.0000012733346],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020124027,0.000015834827,0.00026694158,0.000091994916,0.0000043966243,2.3453995e-7,0.17717244,7.2983725e-10,0.0000028640413,0.8178228,0.00017151347,0.0044308547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016198808,0.00006754876,0.028434426,0.000076724755,0.000053483036,9.945836e-7,0.6633579,0.00003444836,0.0000816796,0.28190514,0.024062023,0.00030575393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021419707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00228126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61620647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006973279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031361898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68336236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2416538959","doi":"10.1177/0261018316653952","title":"The framing of Australian childcare policy problems and their solutions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Policy","topic":"Work-Family Balance Challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Subsidy; Economics; Wage; Labour economics; Public policy; Public administration; Political science; Economic growth; Market economy","score_opus":0.05599072466836481,"score_gpt":0.3597459510083994,"score_spread":0.3037552263400346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2416538959","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13320976,0.0012005796,0.00016021299,0.80942816,0.0002970408,0.00046655882,0.0001609811,0.00021461863,0.054862116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99440694,0.00063761143,0.000024994482,0.0002178954,0.0036154313,0.00002193045,5.431688e-7,0.000014301385,0.0010603345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983685,0.00023712739,0.00021000952,0.00018781857,0.00023264004,0.0007638782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987617,0.00072850613,0.00004774349,0.00013639442,0.00014087159,0.00018477798],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004936511,0.00012291213,0.00018198938,0.00006352646,0.002264859,0.000102781654,0.00030143518,0.000186179,0.000026618714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030534333,0.000073463736,0.000092569004,0.00034718864,0.004425259,0.00014885397,0.00011379692,0.00014345543,0.000012016343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032480502,0.00003231073,0.0011428152,0.000018124501,0.000015728627,2.4503723e-7,0.026493218,4.9405685e-8,0.00041494297,0.93058234,0.0016252372,0.03967173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040733305,0.00006523163,0.11985492,0.00016047485,0.000018635676,0.0000020576963,0.031693388,6.841607e-7,0.00010428161,0.5810011,0.26634914,0.00034275852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057696956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002195364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8611972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017960405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044036002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99903405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510034337","doi":"10.1177/0261018316666251","title":"Realising our (neoliberal) potential? A critical discourse analysis of the Poverty Reduction Strategy in Ontario, Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Policy","topic":"Community Development and Social Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Poverty; Social exclusion; Human rights; Investment (military); Neoliberalism (international relations); Political science; Inclusion (mineral); Culture of poverty; Sociology; Economic growth; Economics; Political economy; Basic needs; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.044939248516305846,"score_gpt":0.3118631290389157,"score_spread":0.26692388052260985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510034337","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91662395,0.000033878296,0.00012929256,0.074344434,0.00029598188,0.0000795851,0.00021194894,0.0000095872465,0.008271369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982764,0.0000051403586,0.000014664575,0.00048127703,0.00023614953,0.0000041523413,0.00000698414,0.000010566034,0.000964643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874353,0.0000811354,0.0005023973,0.00018290992,0.00009066332,0.00039938424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949044,0.00007790277,0.00008342689,0.00019074175,0.00005666926,0.000100805504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027057,0.000118832315,0.0004198276,0.00021331648,0.000256595,0.000052850843,0.00023795894,0.0001167383,0.00021747114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00089334854,0.00009541584,0.00021272138,0.00073914736,0.0001943651,0.00020231844,0.00008847209,0.00022163102,0.0000037421535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035898353,0.00023396281,0.025021207,0.000019578318,0.0002984266,0.000008557631,0.004667694,0.000027120097,0.0001748958,0.95975643,0.0062556774,0.0035005386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027402968,0.000015182333,0.84848386,0.0000208809,0.000081014136,0.00000143434,0.0015138723,0.00006038965,0.000024602792,0.14886376,0.00044000437,0.00022098405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98766226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9592003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8234626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013348678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008253626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3890945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513239595","doi":"10.1177/0261018316664468","title":"The ‘problem’ of abuse in Ontario’s Social Inclusion Act: A critical exploration","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Policy","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Inclusion (mineral); Sexual abuse; Social policy; Criminology; Criminal justice; Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Psychology; Poison control; Law; Medicine; Social psychology; Suicide prevention; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.11850801761704764,"score_gpt":0.4490213598107122,"score_spread":0.3305133421936645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2513239595","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12276518,0.00003435907,0.00023639719,0.8602882,0.00018493885,0.00019566252,0.000009250471,0.00005358132,0.016232407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965722,0.000086725486,0.000092047405,0.001276826,0.0015753612,0.000037271424,0.0000011970733,0.000010976279,0.00034737078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773616,0.00047930333,0.00045015052,0.0001844893,0.000581822,0.00056808355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983866,0.00095754943,0.00005187964,0.000076782955,0.00040090646,0.00012625386],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012505692,0.00010168717,0.00019117544,0.00009676197,0.0024251768,0.000054200696,0.00025804964,0.00027526205,0.00013965045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002271573,0.00007158569,0.00007743198,0.00042038466,0.0015472011,0.00036200913,0.00013125372,0.00024927728,0.000023918978],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023052517,0.00007581127,0.00022187739,0.00001233778,0.0000020898708,0.0000016944933,0.073604174,5.3011133e-9,0.00014883607,0.87358344,0.0005924206,0.05173428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005072907,0.00007011894,0.010666563,0.00006921478,0.000006845087,3.5657973e-7,0.015341,0.0000011899273,0.00007719715,0.63565457,0.33739278,0.00021287496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.070938714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5232936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8738071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007867233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013036465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99887353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588065304","doi":"10.1177/0261018317690664","title":"Technologies of evidence: An institutional ethnography from the standpoints of ‘youth-at-risk’","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Policy","topic":"Education Discipline and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnography; Misrepresentation; Sociology; Social exclusion; Social capital; Gender studies; Objectification; Criminology; Political science; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.36236685442378697,"score_gpt":0.5326204504174049,"score_spread":0.17025359599361795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588065304","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93123585,0.00016015237,0.000054401782,0.060862884,0.00018353359,0.00009735493,0.0003704974,0.000042622865,0.0069927094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985815,0.00013849621,0.00013516049,0.00012375374,0.00097039546,0.0000069979305,0.000005572923,0.0000033958677,0.000034672907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987146,0.00025831306,0.00025483765,0.00014712827,0.00041086518,0.00021425457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868214,0.0004675006,0.00017751833,0.00033468087,0.0002776872,0.000060475177],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094081816,0.000069843154,0.00016610028,0.000040408766,0.0028019447,0.0000681952,0.00074538746,0.00016373159,0.00010318842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017411117,0.00004829421,0.000115056224,0.00018474637,0.006681603,0.00038067414,0.00018253841,0.00016138362,0.000005486617],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029047842,0.00016869631,0.09994255,0.0000151867,0.00002093947,2.6615882e-7,0.07341225,1.9771527e-7,0.00011685485,0.8132738,0.0009660453,0.012054163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016797226,0.000046990786,0.56286156,0.00006769779,0.00005206554,4.6712195e-8,0.10080266,0.000002612891,0.0006390314,0.33276507,0.0024609235,0.00013335304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04549405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035816762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48050871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000067778834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005425844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592436679","doi":"10.1177/0261018317693128","title":"Filling the gaps: Unpaid (and precarious) work in the nonprofit social services","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Policy","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Austerity; Unpaid work; Context (archaeology); Labour economics; Social work; Work (physics); Nonprofit sector; Norm (philosophy); Sociology; Business; Economics; Political science; Public relations; Economic growth; Law","score_opus":0.08878239285343976,"score_gpt":0.4853153379175291,"score_spread":0.39653294506408937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592436679","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46777597,0.00043557622,0.0000041385656,0.49509457,0.00038474286,0.0005481736,0.000026523523,0.000050565883,0.035679724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836222,0.000051555126,0.000009362648,0.00867371,0.006781031,0.00015476809,0.000003336931,0.00001687614,0.00068718253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982006,0.00047248098,0.00027163894,0.00018824774,0.00023080563,0.00063626113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987843,0.0008030806,0.000083518185,0.00020383406,0.00007759574,0.000047694128],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007422855,0.00014476573,0.00022934514,0.000028979779,0.01098482,0.000116890915,0.0005081092,0.00019791654,0.000041418705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000599303,0.000084490355,0.00007566406,0.000118528595,0.0007213662,0.00012232394,0.00037274914,0.0006757665,0.000060223712],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008249532,0.00007370548,0.17044519,0.00047671574,0.000049587416,0.000008621086,0.27350363,6.321626e-8,0.000008145909,0.52865344,0.017189238,0.009509192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004760048,0.000019369203,0.8581231,0.00013985434,0.0000431529,2.566926e-7,0.017749507,0.000003740077,0.0000012867756,0.055129275,0.068151586,0.00016282586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068286606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018947936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.687678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000078986086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008182845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2805069199","doi":"10.1177/0261018318779477","title":"Neoliberalism, mass incarceration, and the US debt–criminal justice complex","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Policy","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Mass incarceration; Neoliberalism (international relations); Criminal justice; Debt; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Political science; Law; Criminology; Economics; Finance; History","score_opus":0.04764096413031452,"score_gpt":0.3943651651981854,"score_spread":0.34672420106787083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2805069199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48421103,0.00018555476,0.013222582,0.28858268,0.00081537134,0.00041416526,0.00003268741,0.00023755281,0.21229838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97624946,0.000059861988,0.00025481364,0.011710446,0.0109199025,0.000017465027,0.0000036706294,0.000010383118,0.00077398884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839145,0.00042243605,0.00021054152,0.0002059001,0.00033750394,0.0004321726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988487,0.0004399581,0.00003466068,0.00011013506,0.0003943391,0.0001722457],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000493591,0.00011311287,0.00019387578,0.00008112379,0.004053828,0.00033533372,0.00020550507,0.00010740234,0.0003531472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001965118,0.0000914212,0.00010874046,0.0005474411,0.0057691336,0.00016489658,0.00006095656,0.0001629948,0.00007931312],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049867416,0.000023854176,0.000016509564,0.000021545084,0.000016576694,0.000002395454,0.05138537,4.2375785e-7,0.000042980388,0.93020207,0.0036694033,0.014569018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017109135,0.00016886622,0.005204039,0.00002500102,0.0052932594,0.00002309534,0.6175952,0.0036770755,0.00004619186,0.20930345,0.15619132,0.00076160853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045298435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007082391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7208986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010625058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021308064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99724275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901998959","doi":"10.1177/0261018318808405e","title":"Book Review: Shannon Stettner, Kristin Burnett and Travis Hay (eds) <i>Abortion: History, Politics, and Reproductive Justice after Morgentaler</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Policy","topic":"History of Science and Medicine","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Reproductive justice; Politics; Criminology; Hay; Sociology; Political science; Law; Biology; Pregnancy; Animal science","score_opus":0.03296573825966926,"score_gpt":0.3126411325974689,"score_spread":0.27967539433779964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901998959","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008915923,0.5961884,0.000020230322,0.182845,0.0030476293,0.000641985,0.00015210193,0.00017115375,0.20801756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22725892,0.01517903,0.00013126164,0.43643656,0.07554977,0.00012244761,0.000027012828,0.00008593201,0.24520908],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985582,0.000063690386,0.00027927832,0.00041765504,0.00025721363,0.00042391577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992137,0.00004456523,0.00004705693,0.00015644376,0.00025191155,0.00028635477],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025105433,0.00017470785,0.00029200356,0.00007786403,0.000687829,0.000044906206,0.000094961935,0.00006217124,0.0031704858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006417046,0.00015874728,0.000051113326,0.00004464411,0.006093403,0.00029510143,0.000047931164,0.0001701566,0.00008319233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014364267,0.00004955646,0.0000032590544,0.00042430637,0.000008146893,0.000014962804,0.02229436,6.3697764e-10,0.00004355388,0.08376781,0.89013606,0.0032436326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017475546,0.00017027745,0.00024126095,0.00017864323,0.0001998978,0.000015239425,0.0010408759,0.0000017540297,0.000013741121,0.001118122,0.9966494,0.00019601837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008514058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000051435094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5810094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001905717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012900133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99774075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2934060719","doi":"10.1177/0261018319839158","title":"Dueling discourses, power, and the construction of <i>the recovering addict</i> : When social assistance confronts addiction in Toronto, Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Policy","topic":"Mental Health and Patient Involvement","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"York University","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); Biopower; Ideology; Power (physics); Governmentality; Sociology; Addiction; Critical discourse analysis; Population; Subject (documents); Gender studies; Social control; Corporate governance; Criminology; Political science; Social science; Law; Politics; Medicine; Psychiatry; Economics","score_opus":0.03795121495456759,"score_gpt":0.38641983480613395,"score_spread":0.34846861985156635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2934060719","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9242294,0.0006218283,0.00003308984,0.026348982,0.0039215344,0.0014513469,0.00048496932,0.000020019925,0.04288885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99513465,0.000031901673,0.000037565653,0.0038396092,0.00064260914,0.000052165808,0.000016139853,0.00001027982,0.00023509866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981486,0.00049687555,0.00047804366,0.00015412451,0.00029555673,0.0004267648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992489,0.000355609,0.00014728282,0.00009612682,0.00006925932,0.00008279974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004200614,0.00010178275,0.00024444322,0.000014796006,0.0008785901,0.000007171326,0.00010503172,0.00012297969,0.00035554523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018509218,0.00007235497,0.00004670017,0.00008048262,0.00030145055,0.00009829883,0.00008109201,0.0003505426,0.0000031525835],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010462848,0.00012185241,0.086479455,0.0014911311,0.000048979546,0.0000013869868,0.025119556,0.0000011366246,0.000095503055,0.84814864,0.016813297,0.020632789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.017753039,0.00029957606,0.65139574,0.003223502,0.00017019536,0.000004474329,0.14325093,0.00051320886,0.00010519312,0.05473594,0.12757361,0.0009745956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7245172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.65963656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7934127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013777347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010464294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67574936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951080099","doi":"10.1177/0261018319857169","title":"From self-government to government of the self: Fiscal subjectivity, Indigenous governance and the politics of transparency","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Policy","topic":"Taxation and Compliance Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Indigenous; Politics; Scrutiny; Taxpayer; Corporate governance; Political science; Public administration; Citizenship; Parliament; Government (linguistics); Audit; Political economy; Law; Economics; Accounting; Finance","score_opus":0.016844694410275106,"score_gpt":0.2459777616682818,"score_spread":0.2291330672580067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951080099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95455396,0.0004000658,0.00015963496,0.019749762,0.00023624902,0.00034718952,0.0017198288,0.000012855638,0.022820456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99853665,0.00007232896,0.00010297846,0.0007487362,0.00028321584,0.000012406579,3.3313074e-7,0.000009347399,0.00023397992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897414,0.00003292911,0.00037063088,0.00019073137,0.00020105841,0.00023050432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939525,0.00017081876,0.00017692833,0.00018898702,0.000020410138,0.000047616002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015991235,0.000105798325,0.00035446667,0.000007869176,0.00016829945,0.000019517538,0.00023289779,0.00005715733,0.00004676624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025776066,0.00008148882,0.0001224405,0.00014588484,0.00021211387,0.000046158577,0.0001347377,0.0001030539,0.000016152955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025288587,0.00015817862,0.063901566,0.000051117255,0.00005963786,1.3362796e-7,0.0113110505,0.0000014340606,0.000022577187,0.92390007,0.00017673765,0.00039220083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084068545,0.000058281996,0.8803146,0.00001882932,0.0000217597,3.903852e-7,0.00081772427,0.00003955298,0.00028640268,0.11196936,0.0054956367,0.00013680433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001539367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034678855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.816413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024381244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033146553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33230177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023067263","doi":"10.1177/0261018319899390b","title":"Book Review: John Grundy <i>Bureaucratic Manoeuvers: The Contested Administration of the Unemployed</i>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Policy","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Bureaucracy; Administration (probate law); Sociology; Political science; Public administration; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.04203089341532277,"score_gpt":0.36630765420106337,"score_spread":0.3242767607857406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023067263","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004193238,0.0043465043,0.000061366365,0.9135339,0.00016368165,0.0005007841,0.00003561787,0.000058256686,0.080880515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67879015,0.0006336202,0.00000802861,0.3174051,0.0020712148,0.000032280994,0.0000023960872,0.000010300321,0.0010469247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821395,0.0005091002,0.0003599459,0.00017278404,0.0003145209,0.00042968785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888426,0.00052732084,0.00007464033,0.00014939664,0.00011976898,0.00024463853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035602145,0.00011664201,0.00025881268,0.000010909581,0.000857692,0.00006156655,0.00047707683,0.00012125989,0.00046267785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069995825,0.00007866021,0.00021547469,0.00036190805,0.0020377939,0.00017551909,0.000083245046,0.00024884474,0.000058543665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008322556,0.000033579006,0.000008342951,0.00011675718,0.0000100983625,0.0000015650111,0.0017433228,4.3236795e-8,0.000016200058,0.745124,0.2523814,0.00055634836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014774929,0.000054097367,0.00036091407,0.00008562334,0.000075397744,9.751241e-7,0.00067474594,0.0000070371552,0.00009245074,0.023356995,0.975028,0.00011604398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012271535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014895345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72264653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008880189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007598909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83796597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153077459","doi":"10.1177/0261018321998934","title":"Commodification and care: An exploration of workforces’ experiences of care in private and public childcare systems from a feminist political theory of care perspective","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Policy","topic":"Social Work Education and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Commodification; Early childhood education; Agency (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Politics; Sociology; Perspective (graphical); Public relations; Political science; Pedagogy; Social science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.07685361334231333,"score_gpt":0.4226582127944854,"score_spread":0.34580459945217207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3153077459","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9649641,0.0044084503,0.00005952387,0.011090029,0.00020651506,0.0002844654,0.00011708478,0.000019710933,0.018850109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99913615,0.000062811254,0.00009495256,0.00009308442,0.00051044096,0.000043316344,0.00004224102,0.000009071269,0.000007914815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99776036,0.0010995981,0.00032339507,0.00024064277,0.00031511937,0.0002609032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980104,0.00069449155,0.00011986102,0.00012021372,0.0008789924,0.00017605402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022550597,0.00009929952,0.00030718252,0.00008634139,0.00047862835,0.00010050022,0.00013040798,0.0001921646,0.000031829833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037301993,0.000110825116,0.000049018527,0.00063732144,0.001609074,0.0004975503,0.00004698232,0.00014184345,3.9877744e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020158497,0.000039361992,0.0015905203,0.000057422418,0.000005026846,3.2333966e-7,0.46512082,6.1295054e-8,0.000015693058,0.532,0.0000021979033,0.001148395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019103086,0.0000626859,0.0059901113,0.000044165652,0.000025981137,2.6581685e-7,0.9631005,0.0000012364529,0.00019216543,0.029789023,0.0005058365,0.00009700237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008702116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001561969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.502211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026367448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007503185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159574442","doi":"10.1177/02610183211009531","title":"Book Review: Ashley J. Bohrer <i>Marxism and Intersectionality: Race, Gender, Class and Sexuality under Contemporary Capitalism</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Policy","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Intersectionality; Race (biology); Gender studies; Human sexuality; Sociology; Class (philosophy); Capitalism; Political science; Politics; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07566530024631436,"score_gpt":0.4321502388563919,"score_spread":0.3564849386100776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159574442","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016134234,0.3871425,0.00013119508,0.4815203,0.0012399924,0.00040300895,0.00029354292,0.00013781786,0.11299741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33777133,0.021673111,0.000042284944,0.6043009,0.008421756,0.000099368575,0.000110908666,0.00008618057,0.027494151],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99720764,0.00084967824,0.00052552647,0.0005707772,0.00026037166,0.0005860252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986346,0.00034998346,0.00007370165,0.00029046572,0.0002117425,0.00043953606],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004651569,0.0002525758,0.0005253185,0.000078677185,0.0006358406,0.00014932125,0.00011556285,0.00034546352,0.0011572241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006728056,0.00027292484,0.00013304401,0.00024311188,0.0010822397,0.00024063457,0.00019348196,0.00050359714,0.00013119626],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016941578,0.00015800919,0.0010700439,0.0015968687,0.00006594585,0.00004583111,0.0009308535,3.537921e-9,0.000018909323,0.27774057,0.7174328,0.0009232454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009517127,0.000056226585,0.052674875,0.00006275307,0.00014776828,0.00020118362,0.0006391499,9.2253475e-7,0.000004050134,0.0884741,0.8563769,0.00041036797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065253344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010104028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3654694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012987791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049447594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3188094008","doi":"10.1177/02610183211033923","title":"Body-worn cameras, police violence and the politics of evidence: A case of ontological gerrymandering","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Policy","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Gerrymandering; Law enforcement; Criminology; Community policing; Police science; Accountability; Political science; Power (physics); Politics; Enforcement; Sociology; Law; Public relations; Criminal justice","score_opus":0.17100355235223627,"score_gpt":0.48855411647842856,"score_spread":0.3175505641261923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3188094008","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94037294,0.00064558996,0.00013426972,0.05069955,0.00010947541,0.00013420019,0.00004048331,0.000028486142,0.007835024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955989,0.0015159933,0.0001614996,0.0011944099,0.0013240158,0.000007724252,5.02529e-7,0.0000065227814,0.00019042421],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812835,0.00070260355,0.0003096263,0.00017092985,0.00026006016,0.00042840195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99681795,0.002511109,0.00008306772,0.0001384867,0.00027281244,0.00017660247],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007129552,0.00009786094,0.0003025354,0.000043914104,0.0010356377,0.000065033375,0.00015971616,0.0001541588,0.00011402364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006280841,0.000071194125,0.00012731641,0.00038050162,0.0036493686,0.00017576283,0.00012322693,0.0002367251,0.0000033631409],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027710508,0.000077064426,0.0004764189,0.00006936927,0.000019571693,0.000030224348,0.07354389,5.3703286e-7,0.00022589504,0.9192593,0.00014116448,0.0061288187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004294572,0.00044707177,0.10870918,0.0022531822,0.0013812778,0.0022388208,0.38408083,0.00063308334,0.0010865208,0.4685683,0.024595965,0.0017112105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4887617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018471628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47029006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000067537934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005215051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194792090","doi":"10.1177/02610183211015621","title":"What fresh hell? UK policies targeting homeless migrants for deportation after Brexit and Covid-19","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Policy","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deportation; Immigration; Brexit; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; Enforcement; Quarter (Canadian coin); Government (linguistics); Population; Public administration; Criminology; Economic growth; Law; Geography; Sociology; Business; European union; Demography; Economics; Medicine; International trade","score_opus":0.07746040911122384,"score_gpt":0.49242593066510565,"score_spread":0.4149655215538818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3194792090","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95615655,0.0020995003,0.0010497797,0.038781717,0.0007265092,0.0004828565,0.00021942983,0.0000994174,0.00038421823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98683053,0.0004116289,0.00021268439,0.007115393,0.004612813,0.00035124246,0.00007946829,0.000040837556,0.00034537536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978057,0.00032365142,0.0004891919,0.00032685822,0.00023660083,0.00081795984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978751,0.0011090133,0.000081994534,0.00010315847,0.00039002494,0.00044070467],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003513198,0.00018528153,0.0005548476,0.00007610813,0.0018617474,0.00015099738,0.00008798638,0.00040377546,0.00027297286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052604163,0.00018739096,0.00013113406,0.0002767812,0.000347664,0.00026343318,0.0001060263,0.00030598443,0.00002412074],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020980198,0.00021002369,0.045469295,0.005152686,0.000082807535,0.0001803345,0.33143383,0.000001221922,0.00065545936,0.6060662,0.0018745245,0.008663785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019014691,0.000059062204,0.080157444,0.00032306026,0.00009874679,0.0000015651023,0.65664136,0.00001543174,0.0002815775,0.243409,0.01652269,0.00058860326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008599297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017960101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36265722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002787733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001180218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224541027","doi":"10.1177/02610183221088461","title":"Navigating multiple pandemics: A critical analysis of the impact of COVID-19 policy responses on gender-based violence services","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Policy","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Harm; Political science; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Public relations; Economic growth; Medicine; Economics","score_opus":0.08091584126288975,"score_gpt":0.4888279214289833,"score_spread":0.40791208016609354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224541027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98482275,0.0000906186,0.00029312976,0.00801523,0.00011471307,0.00029201954,0.0014718238,0.00007957387,0.004820121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956111,0.00001343402,0.0000667096,0.0037650228,0.00046625477,0.00004453163,0.000010694339,0.00001526009,0.0000070286524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99571335,0.001791735,0.0004979382,0.00033541035,0.0009547475,0.0007068399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99556136,0.003422394,0.00014629398,0.00029167175,0.00025242643,0.00032582833],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013527195,0.00018782682,0.00047349604,0.00023849311,0.0023347598,0.000051256167,0.00081414595,0.000139285,0.00016771225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014195373,0.00015778915,0.000726276,0.0032004416,0.0022042494,0.0000922424,0.0002444195,0.0005082244,0.000002734963],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006628593,0.0009838796,0.094449274,0.00032985513,0.0003643741,0.000012710354,0.055890158,0.004803443,0.0025232648,0.83615184,0.00016565251,0.0036626712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019804528,0.0009581353,0.7014066,0.0003317043,0.0014721574,0.0000044453423,0.092160165,0.032299116,0.0010546732,0.16593646,0.0009913963,0.0014047151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12153155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024231753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6702154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008534349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028123767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311504935","doi":"10.1177/02610183221137818","title":"Young people's schooling trajectories and transitions to social adulthood in the context of Brazil's Bolsa Família","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Policy","topic":"Youth Education and Societal Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Inequality; Sociology; Gender studies; Social policy; Young adult; Political science; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Geography","score_opus":0.023426234531094808,"score_gpt":0.37893555361105713,"score_spread":0.3555093190799623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311504935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7716754,0.000058559293,0.00009418467,0.2186037,0.00033331075,0.00034518575,0.00029951203,0.000035968427,0.008554187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950471,0.000009307275,0.000045407178,0.0036463672,0.0010631368,0.00009519793,0.000011132541,0.0000105465015,0.00007181776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981254,0.00058601215,0.00025356424,0.0001711625,0.00046490217,0.0003990053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994454,0.00023410127,0.000033213644,0.00005986819,0.00010869264,0.00011872583],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007331533,0.00009593067,0.00020804364,0.00008914196,0.0027362402,0.0001018382,0.00025384477,0.00009066365,0.000090663656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001142465,0.000099427176,0.00011547374,0.0009860477,0.0005635614,0.00012288343,0.00004684755,0.00035476615,0.0000030445037],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007929319,0.0000788236,0.0008099629,0.000009731484,0.000003835488,5.92569e-7,0.47109464,3.2958104e-7,0.000018974542,0.5265703,0.00042206794,0.0009827947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028111547,0.000044841767,0.11265458,0.000004775567,0.0000231816,0.000002004698,0.86601305,0.000014979707,0.0000016828703,0.016523534,0.0042751357,0.00016111405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012289038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010225685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5100468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020675767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051862583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99856204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4316193302","doi":"10.1177/02610183221142261a","title":"Book Review: <i>Women, Precarious Work and Care: The Failure of Family-Friendly, Rights</i> by Emily Grabham","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Policy","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Family-friendly; Environmentally friendly; Care work; Sociology; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.02625222938808892,"score_gpt":0.40692557242290484,"score_spread":0.3806733430348159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4316193302","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032699082,0.2468449,0.000011015522,0.6978559,0.0006925283,0.0018749613,0.00044250407,0.0004114293,0.019167693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7166505,0.042408142,0.000027653647,0.20916446,0.0064230966,0.0021921494,0.00014307142,0.0001458351,0.022845132],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779695,0.00041270175,0.0004519476,0.00024488525,0.00030121038,0.00079229334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868274,0.0006994422,0.00007375015,0.00019370345,0.00019974007,0.00015063447],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035324594,0.00018941212,0.00045278142,0.000046153626,0.0019079038,0.000010514261,0.0002013294,0.00018971076,0.00011630489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007165169,0.00012724623,0.000101909514,0.0006118105,0.00067916786,0.00006791337,0.00030174028,0.00048617614,0.00008634435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011017065,0.000015000748,0.00042210566,0.0008756977,0.000028150296,0.0000018284966,0.014158285,5.2907247e-9,0.000017741775,0.026380071,0.9571754,0.00091472344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027763203,0.00005634744,0.0032859177,0.00032054482,0.00005194772,1.3471295e-7,0.0035599058,6.782897e-8,0.000005627095,0.006021815,0.9862816,0.00013849862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008513036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000044032873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6839514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001580222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001318155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323046384","doi":"10.1177/02610183231157755","title":"Book Review: <i>Routledge Handbook of Critical Studies in Whiteness</i> by Shona Hunter and Christi van der Westhuizen (eds)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Policy","topic":"Race, History, and American Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Shona; Sociology; History; Anthropology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03944074218306136,"score_gpt":0.4231866061434123,"score_spread":0.38374586396035093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323046384","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003376454,0.7888554,0.00006383973,0.1814754,0.00060741336,0.0006328402,0.00018488478,0.00026042527,0.024543338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4225444,0.40420443,0.0002591245,0.14448686,0.0077108704,0.00035726718,0.000040889958,0.00016326153,0.02023291],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974912,0.00044938872,0.00045403253,0.00037913016,0.00047813213,0.0007481445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985027,0.0008166375,0.00005446036,0.00013737916,0.00022831415,0.00026050798],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000748608,0.00020588569,0.00066839997,0.00008565365,0.0007867429,0.00003425559,0.00023890001,0.00018303894,0.00024714167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047000954,0.00020980567,0.0001794605,0.00073735823,0.007815781,0.00022633788,0.00012754365,0.00026787742,0.00007542723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008355648,0.000104666855,0.00022043106,0.00072622753,0.000022753635,0.000013760222,0.020382084,3.4736168e-8,0.00014764357,0.009427951,0.96594715,0.0029989637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033144566,0.000054450717,0.000717006,0.00062783866,0.00008135252,0.0000013008694,0.009304957,0.0000022526494,0.000029705703,0.005466258,0.9830445,0.00033893593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010313566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000118521646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41916794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023338273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003021485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9948844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388571112","doi":"10.1177/02610183231213520","title":"Book Review: <i>Making a Mindful Nation: Mental Health and Governance in the Twenty-first Century</i> by Joanna Cook","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Policy","topic":"Mental Health and Patient Involvement","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Mental health; Corporate governance; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; History; Psychoanalysis; Public administration; Psychiatry; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.11458388986032722,"score_gpt":0.46529360339185494,"score_spread":0.3507097135315277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388571112","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002007719,0.15141842,0.0000058877367,0.8335785,0.0008729559,0.0028732473,0.0007016583,0.000088850196,0.008452756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.041053295,0.047522735,0.000014901881,0.90689236,0.0016814247,0.0006519179,0.00048501845,0.000030986717,0.0016673651],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99688935,0.0007107602,0.00066460733,0.00027034336,0.0005045086,0.00096041017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989771,0.00043594863,0.00014529932,0.00013450187,0.000045301087,0.00026180834],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010457335,0.00016242037,0.00030031256,0.000047294296,0.0020667524,0.000015367283,0.00018203918,0.000110454705,0.00030051422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033687704,0.00013236713,0.000054879198,0.00053091743,0.00016268528,0.00011862719,0.0001259832,0.000511105,0.00023645883],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022198557,0.00008286126,0.00051817135,0.0040451274,0.0000027172719,0.0000025573963,0.009504737,9.585377e-9,5.337969e-7,0.022714859,0.9601837,0.0029225722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005599392,0.00010570743,0.0008169216,0.0025928586,0.000004149308,0.0000010418697,0.0025298737,0.000014282267,7.4908166e-7,0.0007206161,0.9925368,0.00011707808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009800231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001896837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10389569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057005446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040911837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390585882","doi":"10.1177/02610183231219187","title":"Bordering social reproduction: The welfare/immigration regimes of Quebec and Ontario in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Welfare state; Social policy; Immigration; Social reproduction; Welfare; Reproduction; Citizenship; Social Welfare; Sociology; Political science; Demographic economics; Economics; Social science; Law; Social capital; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.023660201527352553,"score_gpt":0.3378039495831053,"score_spread":0.31414374805575274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390585882","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3697193,0.00054488255,0.0000040717714,0.6078205,0.0006468008,0.0001758101,0.000011896147,0.000043705662,0.021033049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931327,0.00007216942,0.0000054245093,0.00032546336,0.004819683,0.000017111404,0.0000011980669,0.000008106713,0.001618135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877965,0.00014361273,0.00023010078,0.00020133298,0.00029788344,0.00034743734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965936,0.0001415361,0.00002676476,0.000056281253,0.00006730109,0.000048760052],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003780066,0.00009567919,0.00018811136,0.000055176377,0.0014781917,0.00007990185,0.000104606326,0.00009776493,0.00002276896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006165951,0.00007478339,0.00006155012,0.0004866649,0.0010212418,0.00015348595,0.00005259743,0.00024266838,0.0000010795626],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066492803,0.000010202386,0.00062407594,0.00004181664,0.00001970692,0.0000043964333,0.10949908,2.3152177e-7,0.0000064346755,0.8683538,0.0028124077,0.018621242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023993736,0.000027814696,0.34768537,0.00006869423,0.000073805386,0.000002558054,0.20655921,0.00001251768,0.000053244526,0.16045053,0.28439206,0.00043425715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9997458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7079032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011752918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033515038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396870125","doi":"10.1177/02610183241249696","title":"Operationalising intersectionality in equality and domestic abuse policy in Scotland: Contradictions, contestations and erasure","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Policy","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Intersectionality; Feminism; Sociology; Politics; Gender studies; Inequality; Domestic violence; Political science; Law; Poison control; Suicide prevention","score_opus":0.058612422327112515,"score_gpt":0.4546580613661609,"score_spread":0.3960456390390484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396870125","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85348505,0.00069086597,0.0012087908,0.12935679,0.000315015,0.00036017646,0.00012593454,0.000085312415,0.014372098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979019,0.000121265,0.00006738846,0.0006581355,0.0010981533,0.000023062415,0.000011557509,0.0000072750204,0.00011121895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867904,0.00035681768,0.0002512553,0.0002176118,0.00019643959,0.0002988533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916893,0.00057581544,0.000012249899,0.00003900151,0.0000660236,0.0001379773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062758307,0.000081934995,0.0001339947,0.0002718124,0.00044061992,0.00032854904,0.000042807496,0.00010680724,0.00001540167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015473306,0.00008620134,0.000029837327,0.0004929238,0.00070671696,0.0002788169,0.000018030089,0.00019696268,0.000002664791],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038147255,0.000030828363,0.0051876,0.00004017387,0.000006212525,0.0000075424405,0.034843866,0.000004075901,0.0000437212,0.9587565,0.00006121239,0.0010144351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004774443,0.000017572684,0.29077798,0.00007938336,0.00001506227,0.00001263129,0.013374362,0.00063114165,0.0000039450692,0.6921819,0.002249777,0.00017882689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08552623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012010261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28559038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031462847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058934884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92056334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}