{"meta":{"query_hash":"8e6464f3c654","filters":{"venue":"Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/8e6464f3c654","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Curentul+Juridic%2C+The+Juridical+Current%2C+Le+Courant+Juridique"},"results":[{"id":"W1498532345","doi":"","title":"MEETING POINTS BETWEEN THE TRADITIONS OF ENGLISH–AMERICAN COMMON LAW AND CONTINENTAL-FRENCH CIVIL LAW. Developments and the experience of postmodernity in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Supreme court; Multiculturalism; Civil law (Civil law); Common law; Comparative law; Sociology; Public law","score_opus":0.03298547501506394,"score_gpt":0.2771350715746441,"score_spread":0.24414959655958018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1498532345","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23692009,0.020999478,0.0047918386,0.14606941,0.0006989962,0.000067943765,0.000308455,0.00014244048,0.5900013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94652444,0.0016308487,0.0006662368,0.003164893,0.000056079705,0.00001594654,0.000029502758,0.000040521176,0.04787155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952533,0.0012374017,0.0000777447,0.0004813742,0.0013025469,0.0016475961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99556524,0.0012903557,0.00035464772,0.00015873076,0.001573069,0.0010579685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036059837,0.0004738979,0.0002924075,0.0018352161,0.033990044,0.013806599,0.0018258239,0.002904906,0.0077089895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005388878,0.00024197546,0.00027183487,0.0033769766,0.03899421,0.0038332646,0.003737557,0.0041767387,0.00047757063],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041110972,0.000024913674,0.0023316587,0.00004838977,0.000007329924,0.00047098153,0.20105687,0.00016578312,0.0003450031,0.7640405,0.015173342,0.016294096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012153723,0.000028638455,0.012247227,0.00023628463,0.000017224838,0.00030152375,0.19353381,0.00060249877,0.00043454007,0.04201996,0.75048697,0.00007923743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98514056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.990244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17608576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17608576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13386875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95562375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1600676903","doi":"","title":"The necessity of a distinct regulation for public-private partnership contract","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique","topic":"Public-Private Partnership Projects","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Private sector; Business; General partnership; Divestment; Public sector; Public–private partnership; Private investment in public equity; Private finance initiative; Function (biology); Finance; Public relations; Public economics; Public administration; Economics; Private equity; Private equity firm; Economic growth; Political science","score_opus":0.04045918301076147,"score_gpt":0.27651371841932465,"score_spread":0.2360545354085632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1600676903","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010287954,0.0017566069,0.28778636,0.094578,0.0039214734,0.0038087943,0.0008581012,0.00058696215,0.5964157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43348557,0.0016501213,0.30197516,0.0804988,0.0030747256,0.011196954,0.0011172869,0.00040833474,0.16659302],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9088143,0.026557771,0.0082609225,0.011003051,0.03977311,0.0055907234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9014006,0.04721123,0.0038380807,0.020076457,0.02343945,0.004034122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07148635,0.0006886855,0.0017033144,0.0014577217,0.00838774,0.017471986,0.0057714046,0.024816114,0.006355911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09027169,0.0013616482,0.0016633217,0.0020742875,0.014227079,0.013165499,0.0067819585,0.023986107,0.00377295],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005432057,0.000022814875,0.00005885804,0.000015391686,0.0000015725486,0.000029653767,0.00034154984,0.00006826832,0.000092551054,0.9932681,0.0041544503,0.0019413691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011683326,0.000093634066,0.0007404521,0.00056254055,0.00002402489,0.00052774954,0.00074112223,0.001654086,0.00085969386,0.5612976,0.43323797,0.00014434053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012547543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0111864405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07148635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010902703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041712806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37806046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W818722406","doi":"","title":"CIVILIAN OVERSIGHT OF POLICE THE CANADIAN EXPERIENCE","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theme (computing); Police department; Presentation (obstetrics); Corporate governance; Context (archaeology); Police science; Political science; Law; Metropolitan police; Public administration; Criminology; Criminal justice ethics; Criminal justice; Sociology; Management; History; Medicine; Theory of criminal justice","score_opus":0.09988885100022876,"score_gpt":0.3798649060798382,"score_spread":0.27997605507960943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W818722406","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6106698,0.0076385597,0.0013347267,0.10155523,0.0012827155,0.00020368432,0.00047032433,0.0001391142,0.2767058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9674837,0.00297235,0.0003730753,0.0041914154,0.000066644374,0.0000318999,0.00006869782,0.00004459531,0.024767624],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98476934,0.002925144,0.0003298697,0.0009063825,0.0042400346,0.0068292376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9823515,0.0022206,0.0009399873,0.00044692846,0.006152233,0.007888718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005968751,0.0006752477,0.00069736486,0.0021495218,0.06874707,0.011908028,0.0032443653,0.003605326,0.01135886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016345464,0.00096518605,0.00049127656,0.007291531,0.025939034,0.0038732046,0.0072152033,0.008633642,0.0006529012],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079892714,0.000106399595,0.0139248045,0.00017154208,0.000023612614,0.0024733164,0.79879856,0.00049189106,0.0005913482,0.09786222,0.052442614,0.033033833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016993412,0.000048773316,0.0143412845,0.00026919568,0.00001541406,0.0005810173,0.6263037,0.00026826246,0.00021922983,0.0025408862,0.3552572,0.00013814183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99662423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76096636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23903362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31694278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8826131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}