{"meta":{"query_hash":"5ca45a937404","filters":{"venue":"Current Issues in Language Planning"},"cohort_total":15,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":15,"exported":15,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/5ca45a937404","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Current+Issues+in+Language+Planning"},"results":[{"id":"W1983290622","doi":"10.1080/14664200802139521","title":"Assessment policy in teacher education: responding to the personnel implications of language policy changes","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Issues in Language Planning","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Churchill Northern Studies Centre; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Language planning; Language policy; Education policy; Pedagogy; Political science; Policy development; Language education; Language assessment; Teacher education; Sociology; Higher education; Public administration","score_opus":0.09843918909330573,"score_gpt":0.5410410158178237,"score_spread":0.442601826724518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983290622","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016672077,0.003733784,0.004242151,0.93332195,0.0016755399,0.00009137443,0.000031517084,0.00007855041,0.040153097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65435964,0.008097896,0.010613173,0.27412006,0.0026409936,0.00025971545,0.00009922772,0.00014264774,0.049666718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9332671,0.03119925,0.002267725,0.0036361334,0.018249474,0.011380394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8785759,0.0708971,0.0066231536,0.0020169811,0.026363207,0.015523505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07246058,0.00048765974,0.0006611868,0.0030851862,0.022048622,0.024445793,0.0043042977,0.020254161,0.007281867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10590498,0.00096282555,0.0005037515,0.0032045755,0.023603683,0.009027068,0.010589087,0.018845223,0.0009545243],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011893765,0.00027909345,0.013877159,0.0007381989,0.000039174818,0.0013551917,0.042522684,0.007321282,0.0019586124,0.5996622,0.17313124,0.15899633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062999345,0.00013115724,0.015994433,0.0011380743,0.000019294765,0.00020463206,0.038587466,0.0025264253,0.0007930176,0.11530798,0.8250461,0.00018835666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55420977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.501724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55420977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.094987296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20564064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89683115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065075932","doi":"10.1080/14664200208668041","title":"Language Planning and the British Empire: Comparing Pakistan, Malaysia and Kenya","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Issues in Language Planning","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Empire; Sovereignty; British Empire; Context (archaeology); Language planning; Element (criminal law); Colonialism; History; Imperial unit system; Political science; Economic history; Sociology; Law; Ancient history; Politics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.07511536278664666,"score_gpt":0.461930281182147,"score_spread":0.38681491839550036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065075932","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9881897,0.0009577377,0.000022800805,0.0001637508,0.0000045120905,0.000008345434,0.000082964696,9.1873295e-7,0.010569301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982497,0.0007936422,0.000041166175,0.00003439943,0.0000017257287,0.0000056556137,0.00008003357,0.000001151735,0.0007924555],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996865,0.000093052775,0.000017575241,0.000019619505,0.00004566416,0.0001377356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992262,0.00020307333,0.00020054827,0.000023491533,0.00019662394,0.00014994552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039577342,0.00018154303,0.0001844348,0.0016184226,0.0018000004,0.0013221432,0.00021943744,0.00020412743,0.0029200728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016807081,0.00012578507,0.00008180223,0.0032079616,0.0011022456,0.0009938338,0.0012035801,0.0005045747,0.00034028577],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052265596,0.00015575637,0.8634725,0.0003040691,0.00007569965,0.002195004,0.07017723,0.00035960966,0.0013672597,0.0064659347,0.0017686778,0.053135607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016921496,0.0001048291,0.88002634,0.00014466705,0.000024000965,0.0006875808,0.1076386,0.0001430763,0.00027830497,0.00024850856,0.010668881,0.000018331064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28515163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6159206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28515163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019247256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018410182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5669837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067000131","doi":"10.1080/14664200408669079","title":"Conceptions of Literacy in Canadian Immigrant Language Training","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Issues in Language Planning","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Immigration; Literacy; Refugee; Political science; Language policy; Training (meteorology); Language planning; Sociology; Pedagogy; Linguistics; Computer science; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.07902543946898309,"score_gpt":0.515854195392868,"score_spread":0.4368287559238849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067000131","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22091112,0.0062717046,0.003998471,0.03775727,0.00015569066,0.000089411595,0.00016776894,0.000041236377,0.7306073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98676443,0.001267934,0.00081561605,0.0010451043,0.000023183322,0.000034017467,0.000032289023,0.000012105565,0.010005258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965475,0.0011049567,0.00008452797,0.00026287895,0.0007726206,0.0012273926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99758565,0.000755208,0.00019539357,0.000083284314,0.0007321193,0.00064841454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031712896,0.00041941856,0.00026865798,0.004340296,0.018865049,0.01315236,0.001551369,0.0021135875,0.003916709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005633542,0.00023260631,0.00037503187,0.004135207,0.048638973,0.004084621,0.0044711935,0.0027507544,0.00017169771],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009607858,0.000012138501,0.0027524892,0.000023960129,0.0000025511397,0.00017730515,0.10451387,0.00032439703,0.000069332586,0.88478893,0.0019045236,0.0054208855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033169228,0.000040249528,0.03812443,0.00078472635,0.000042653053,0.0006064873,0.3817588,0.0032059352,0.00024019027,0.36799258,0.20700571,0.00016497845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97138155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95882756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13099755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13099755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08068733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9504582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085570244","doi":"10.1080/14664200802354427","title":"‘Nehiyawewin Askîhk’: Cree Language on the Land: Language Planning Through Consultation in the Loon River Cree First Nation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Issues in Language Planning","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta; University of Manitoba; University of Winnipeg","keywords":"Unit (ring theory); Government (linguistics); Logging; Geography; Land use; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Forestry; Ecology","score_opus":0.1725047305963811,"score_gpt":0.4754170041622889,"score_spread":0.3029122735659078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085570244","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63016456,0.005545764,0.0029907685,0.05785337,0.00047503956,0.00021128598,0.0000507776,0.00007800334,0.30263045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93108815,0.0017840272,0.0017197594,0.0042412286,0.000041186875,0.00010551313,0.000039464205,0.00006701529,0.06091361],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979063,0.0012237421,0.000023256807,0.00009652061,0.00013702875,0.0006130152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859136,0.000526904,0.00007610826,0.000038681585,0.00016633514,0.00060068746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002287146,0.00026383883,0.00017877738,0.0005584254,0.024862112,0.005220596,0.0012454516,0.0020756263,0.006948686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031546673,0.00026775684,0.0001347307,0.0007342205,0.010605331,0.0043352013,0.005958501,0.002976937,0.00068602693],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001736165,0.00003547557,0.0014973888,0.0000534727,0.0000021815579,0.0023815888,0.94592696,0.0000515065,0.0006207505,0.016335439,0.013577833,0.019500103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025280135,0.000010772286,0.0018297673,0.00007121884,0.0000017324069,0.0002890319,0.8715437,0.00004159807,0.00013728667,0.0010423462,0.12501633,0.000013747277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.334657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6653414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.665343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010919825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021123482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66541815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2474086251","doi":"10.1080/14664208.2016.1204058","title":"University administrators as forced language policy agents. An institutional ethnography of parallel language strategy and practices at the University of Copenhagen","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Issues in Language Planning","topic":"Second Language Learning and Teaching","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministère de l'Education Nationale, de l'Enseignement Superieur et de la Recherche","keywords":"Internationalization; Danish; Globalization; Language policy; Political science; Sociology; Higher education; Foreign language; Immigration; National language; Pedagogy; Law; Linguistics; Economics","score_opus":0.0622605912711023,"score_gpt":0.3583219060071018,"score_spread":0.2960613147359995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2474086251","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95078707,0.003546479,0.0016756527,0.0103849685,0.00019758263,0.000088138266,0.000086148124,0.000039688555,0.033194277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99465203,0.0005503797,0.00020225269,0.0005765836,0.000016478825,0.000036594614,0.000015493686,0.000024569259,0.003925632],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96878827,0.020933397,0.0012664519,0.0017881333,0.002160123,0.0050636875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97717756,0.015264022,0.0025886856,0.00105174,0.0011198751,0.0027980586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018885437,0.00037269984,0.0005951645,0.0033265327,0.021335447,0.026595578,0.002412945,0.0036157044,0.0035203309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024404634,0.0012290974,0.00038968003,0.0039365795,0.031191941,0.013979485,0.013164688,0.004586791,0.0007397294],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020399526,0.000034600074,0.0034915907,0.00003449481,0.000003443832,0.00014560689,0.9725336,0.00003657439,0.00013331474,0.020146158,0.0006329225,0.0027872517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004511907,0.00001776042,0.003941357,0.00009584561,0.000007297688,0.000050311523,0.9681667,0.00006609428,0.0001597679,0.0011112482,0.026361134,0.000017836837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032396615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041053724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032396615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019417986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016273469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14088804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045487171","doi":"10.1080/14664208.2020.1785751","title":"Language solidarity, vitality and status: Sibe family language attitudes in North-western China","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Issues in Language Planning","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Vitality; Solidarity; China; Residence; First language; Ethnic group; Psychology; Pessimism; Social psychology; Gender studies; Sociology; Developmental psychology; Political science; Demography; Medicine","score_opus":0.08885588543288668,"score_gpt":0.4903039594177494,"score_spread":0.4014480739848627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3045487171","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99977165,0.000015627904,0.0000044246426,0.0000139148,5.5310176e-7,0.000001105023,0.000004734687,1.6548043e-7,0.00018766608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996408,0.000041212574,0.000014117823,0.000012316897,4.992636e-7,0.0000024821481,0.0000151338245,2.6569072e-7,0.0002732731],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997012,0.00007406721,0.000024472667,0.00003679224,0.000059803024,0.00010365745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992505,0.00011341859,0.00022317166,0.000030373569,0.000119160504,0.0002633673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008035103,0.00022430663,0.00022511694,0.0009290157,0.0023219052,0.0006717866,0.00023533925,0.0002066131,0.0013422787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009879924,0.00016347748,0.0001627839,0.0008601344,0.00092558196,0.00048669058,0.00075319025,0.00034416086,0.00012467001],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028399238,0.00007311722,0.93842846,0.000015960637,0.000010299106,0.00038543151,0.055116743,0.000023909994,0.0006086013,0.00012324094,0.000077423174,0.0051084734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021312776,0.000056063745,0.9390686,0.000012570385,0.000005143744,0.00014477431,0.06002299,0.000070986745,0.00012908928,0.000037713005,0.0004446618,0.000005194193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.074977174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14591925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.074977174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009953177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009743153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14908147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4292266611","doi":"10.1080/14664208.2022.2111933","title":"Family language policy in Indigenous and bilingual communities: case studies of Nahuatl-speaking caregivers in Mexico","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Issues in Language Planning","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Nahuatl; Indigenous; Sociology; Politics; Political science; Linguistics; Law","score_opus":0.10792204315120457,"score_gpt":0.5098333153107389,"score_spread":0.40191127215953437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4292266611","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99839574,0.00018764906,0.00005865381,0.00029455282,0.0000031174059,0.000012460089,0.000009007653,0.0000010278967,0.0010377999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984925,0.0005194347,0.00018547643,0.000084799314,0.000003813162,0.000028172417,0.00001201332,0.0000016042143,0.0006722382],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920493,0.00040431067,0.000021658132,0.00005692944,0.000048181213,0.00026402072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990852,0.00042092503,0.00017670394,0.000040384777,0.000091186776,0.00018550409],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012953874,0.00024720293,0.00029519232,0.00067739305,0.012322618,0.001341381,0.0008359684,0.000945434,0.0015981665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029807026,0.00019654962,0.00015749241,0.0008729504,0.0028482785,0.00086406386,0.0027402772,0.0010072298,0.0000722706],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005362851,0.00015730746,0.07365433,0.00012435182,0.000012041383,0.0128904795,0.8974195,0.00010024181,0.0005341039,0.0019888151,0.0004601586,0.012605124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036854242,0.000047391222,0.023352059,0.000080267135,0.000010217188,0.0013155877,0.9712048,0.00006225397,0.00016339037,0.00021957095,0.003535021,0.0000058083356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13125928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28564405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13125928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004993601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046827137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2609905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398771300","doi":"10.1080/14664208.2024.2358278","title":"The politics of distraction in planning English-medium education policy in schools","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Issues in Language Planning","topic":"Second Language Learning and Teaching","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Killam Trusts","keywords":"Distraction; Politics; Language planning; Medium of instruction; Political science; Public administration; Sociology; Pedagogy; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.025120836327447073,"score_gpt":0.3581373855733363,"score_spread":0.33301654924588925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398771300","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70980054,0.003864381,0.01299391,0.06102062,0.00022739836,0.00025948713,0.000056899546,0.00004865484,0.21172813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99632335,0.00025652896,0.00048240717,0.0011977076,0.000017276752,0.00005478615,0.00000350682,0.00000749715,0.0016570434],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9767049,0.017994644,0.00037820856,0.00087471376,0.0009964231,0.0030510733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97661126,0.020391526,0.001053804,0.000417891,0.000688632,0.0008368894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019268984,0.00037895748,0.00055333687,0.0022234607,0.021567611,0.02066008,0.0013440081,0.0041961945,0.0030137815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017891452,0.0006791681,0.0003548529,0.00201155,0.056179736,0.010118627,0.014315321,0.007132712,0.00022357702],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037417667,0.000042666026,0.0022145475,0.00012181806,0.0000093896415,0.00064753345,0.5424587,0.0004397178,0.00028141323,0.44577494,0.0010154366,0.006956302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002322342,0.00005281441,0.0020499385,0.00060637895,0.000017176737,0.00016040259,0.7666124,0.00051004865,0.00088596204,0.1436644,0.085374594,0.00004255177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014174311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02029065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021567611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020466026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02078645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14849216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399282499","doi":"10.1080/14664208.2024.2355016","title":"Slogans as a policy distractor: a case of ‘washback’ discourse in English language testing reforms in Japan","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Issues in Language Planning","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science","keywords":"Linguistics; Language assessment; Language policy; Political science; Pedagogy; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06802258255881054,"score_gpt":0.5263330013664648,"score_spread":0.4583104188076542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399282499","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9161843,0.0016933115,0.008089809,0.034789316,0.00031720885,0.000109291344,0.000036602534,0.00010406398,0.038676143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99488765,0.00018446398,0.0007336795,0.0023498642,0.00006720789,0.000059542206,0.000013119052,0.000039414794,0.0016649769],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9733936,0.016232867,0.0013612502,0.001854887,0.003033361,0.00412407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9643279,0.022353109,0.0063220086,0.0024970619,0.0021580397,0.0023417927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027104223,0.0008350342,0.0007929353,0.002856909,0.029994788,0.011401627,0.0022104143,0.008002551,0.0022976156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030497385,0.0011222535,0.00090861006,0.0036634144,0.036822397,0.01015463,0.014388143,0.010858994,0.00022917586],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010334968,0.000082928724,0.009949,0.00017082437,0.000027529479,0.004686441,0.8834103,0.00044610887,0.0018717905,0.08942148,0.0027123324,0.007117957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057625042,0.000090692716,0.014503398,0.00043177046,0.00007343126,0.0008042538,0.8249654,0.0028806229,0.0024246555,0.02876249,0.124767244,0.00023836558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04300503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031557076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04300503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023078866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01117007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16744965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400316128","doi":"10.1080/14664208.2024.2370670","title":"Distractive language education policies and the endangerment of Indigenous languages in Bangladesh","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Issues in Language Planning","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Language planning; Linguistics; Languages of Africa; Language policy; Political science; Native-language instruction; Sociology; History; Pedagogy; Teaching method","score_opus":0.03358203997026831,"score_gpt":0.4969437280823845,"score_spread":0.4633616881121162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400316128","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5522885,0.013228537,0.001823687,0.15170886,0.00014987304,0.00006189195,0.00010744921,0.000040523748,0.28059065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870206,0.0042929016,0.0002392578,0.0027814712,0.000020754107,0.00003022439,0.000010567084,0.0000050179933,0.005599277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99679524,0.0018425345,0.00011095243,0.00013189329,0.00029489957,0.0008243873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962519,0.002041019,0.00075459614,0.000108395274,0.00034736755,0.0004967037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030643737,0.00019253988,0.00018953336,0.00092313223,0.004374546,0.0043784287,0.0006693317,0.001831612,0.003672338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048271734,0.00018120857,0.00012247167,0.001018994,0.00882329,0.0027517723,0.0043041976,0.0019875292,0.0002669053],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078469384,0.00009856731,0.013531065,0.0004946669,0.000021457778,0.001981434,0.058459077,0.002148027,0.0016526397,0.87690514,0.00591988,0.03870956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000827283,0.00031447998,0.053059496,0.0028702556,0.00005678393,0.001104642,0.25224268,0.0021557314,0.0028445045,0.32154694,0.36351842,0.00020325239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058004826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.068214394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058004826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013531997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012586875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11533439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411147288","doi":"10.1080/14664208.2025.2516345","title":"To count or not to count ‘francophones.’ Reading language planning and policy through the words of quantification","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Issues in Language Planning","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Count data; Reading (process); Linguistics; Statistics; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08849691424363162,"score_gpt":0.5317048793862983,"score_spread":0.4432079651426667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411147288","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.112644866,0.019726377,0.06849422,0.27858302,0.0023954867,0.00008892951,0.00056618144,0.00020722342,0.5172937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96616524,0.0027916268,0.012123794,0.0067910235,0.00037424327,0.00009817544,0.00012545937,0.00008656494,0.011443891],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98705775,0.0087595405,0.0004224827,0.0011589276,0.0017604815,0.0008407474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98324674,0.011835609,0.0014080093,0.0007952848,0.002312636,0.0004017942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016236167,0.00066820387,0.00042676873,0.0036659199,0.0068624844,0.008197503,0.0011204798,0.0021769435,0.0034186076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023789937,0.00021269661,0.00028366962,0.0032197544,0.029708773,0.013565715,0.002996623,0.0031807052,0.0003534295],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001503003,0.0000047517065,0.0010819423,0.000053150576,0.000005957912,0.00003729346,0.030780183,0.00011258203,0.00015432037,0.939905,0.006068187,0.021781554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000111302425,0.000035143592,0.0057696784,0.0007777575,0.000022305418,0.00013792052,0.082156815,0.0010437634,0.0010435762,0.5810225,0.32789215,0.000087285945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.073948205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.074959606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.073948205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012602803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007987032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14703554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412151029","doi":"10.1080/14664208.2025.2524285","title":"Evaluating the validity of census data for tracking speaker numbers: an investigation of Canada’s Indigenous languages","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Issues in Language Planning","topic":"Linguistic Variation and Morphology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Wenner-Gren Stiftelserna","keywords":"Census; Indigenous; Tracking (education); Linguistics; Geography; Statistics; Natural language processing; Genealogy; Computer science; Sociology; History; Demography; Mathematics; Population; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.22320757621427456,"score_gpt":0.5056563730349884,"score_spread":0.2824487968207139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412151029","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95258766,0.0018752087,0.012464564,0.0047292514,0.00013398452,0.00034716615,0.009963124,0.00012010811,0.017778873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98908526,0.00051322917,0.006026218,0.00029172222,0.000022040509,0.00012717217,0.0028829002,0.000054564258,0.0009969476],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9688712,0.00899402,0.001671736,0.0022117756,0.016131535,0.002119698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8612395,0.03651806,0.014635171,0.008699051,0.07617506,0.0027331226],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039534934,0.00047898298,0.0005183183,0.004396419,0.0045318143,0.0033024522,0.00300794,0.0004932224,0.0009645177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1956109,0.00047145,0.000622579,0.009808247,0.0031648476,0.0017580254,0.003037347,0.0010577589,0.00021760935],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087083936,0.000020579826,0.9518177,0.00015029387,0.00021242608,0.000087949345,0.015237223,0.0018324415,0.00018539003,0.0027861914,0.0038172828,0.02376543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010688094,0.000031532345,0.96772,0.00034064532,0.00009369949,0.00005586159,0.012193099,0.0077467407,0.0005200275,0.00064620835,0.0105798375,0.00006164873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9901664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9900919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.971533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028467022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05860622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20908326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413119082","doi":"10.1080/14664208.2025.2535820","title":"Language ideologies, policies, and media discourse in census questionnaires: a historical comparative analysis of four multilingual societies","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Issues in Language Planning","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Census; Linguistics; Political science; Sociology; Social science; Gender studies; Politics; Population; Law; Demography","score_opus":0.12145499326896805,"score_gpt":0.5336530137048086,"score_spread":0.41219802043584053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413119082","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9822464,0.0011583146,0.00078933977,0.00075740315,0.000024127237,0.0000844148,0.0005828808,0.000013432444,0.014343752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965647,0.0007166518,0.00055911613,0.00009566936,0.000011265163,0.00006702949,0.000296588,0.000019022105,0.0016699417],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99634415,0.0021675779,0.0002076052,0.00028179135,0.0005009041,0.00049799785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9794586,0.012075065,0.0027057165,0.0008369838,0.0041486844,0.0007749853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0082751,0.0002146066,0.00023806523,0.00840017,0.0044459137,0.0032067269,0.0006401034,0.00042212644,0.0025441854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020253697,0.00029087768,0.00014987284,0.010777178,0.005150832,0.004266711,0.0036208166,0.0006957156,0.00027233944],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075275915,0.0000427178,0.11388669,0.00017779728,0.0000072998996,0.00044829005,0.83959794,0.000070989176,0.0004906009,0.012081108,0.0010823834,0.032038905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037767932,0.000035028286,0.20670491,0.00028365714,0.000009986412,0.0002147751,0.73958486,0.00025274925,0.0009435084,0.001193796,0.05073886,0.000034054705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14670582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23909986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14670582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009039498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068314984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29170376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416711364","doi":"10.1080/14664208.2025.2584511","title":"Towards a political economy of immigrant languages and multilingualism","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Issues in Language Planning","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Multilingualism; Immigration; Politics; Language planning; Language policy; Citizenship; Sociolinguistics","score_opus":0.04771109186042525,"score_gpt":0.5255249826171354,"score_spread":0.47781389075671016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416711364","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36751208,0.002136389,0.0030899965,0.065097034,0.000095112715,0.00002486498,0.000038146354,0.00001756426,0.56198883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948649,0.00038418252,0.0001986291,0.00067658693,0.000023449571,0.000007054616,0.000003800733,0.000004769988,0.003836573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978927,0.001113726,0.00001982003,0.00010605727,0.00026359328,0.000604095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977208,0.0011446136,0.00033674645,0.000085815365,0.00027078987,0.00044128008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003061517,0.00015466247,0.0001677119,0.0012949334,0.006493355,0.012214304,0.000595939,0.0016473479,0.0061278143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003319494,0.00017302681,0.00020313488,0.0013407819,0.027235506,0.004108046,0.00484984,0.0022843718,0.00021504452],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000793506,0.000012535485,0.0020198256,0.000010998265,0.0000018981768,0.00013216602,0.013178085,0.00016446225,0.00006544284,0.9814341,0.0006168264,0.0023556144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032719985,0.00002475385,0.014042902,0.0002320523,0.000015139288,0.00020888502,0.1350747,0.001807445,0.00030531513,0.72452766,0.12370115,0.000027301105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08140028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09235192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08140028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0144626545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010749599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16185296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417024252","doi":"10.1080/14664208.2025.2592367","title":"GenAI-empowered teachers as active actors of change in developing (inter)national human capital in Singapore","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Issues in Language Planning","topic":"Socioeconomic Development in Asia","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Human capital; Developing country; Human resources; Capital (architecture); Higher education","score_opus":0.0830869567479857,"score_gpt":0.4531942138439348,"score_spread":0.3701072570959491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417024252","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91530967,0.00067414367,0.0015945213,0.0071921134,0.00010360446,0.000053643285,0.000024215755,0.000039172526,0.0750089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99341667,0.00020099722,0.00033677107,0.0002345192,0.0000065108816,0.000014821375,0.000008993391,0.000006780041,0.00577396],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788743,0.0011862783,0.000060796934,0.00016171564,0.00017449747,0.00052929885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982547,0.0003322977,0.00021501105,0.00010425792,0.00015775659,0.0009358494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00277318,0.00020561944,0.00019034941,0.00055524835,0.00525463,0.0058301156,0.00052244763,0.00079840614,0.0041758027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020535053,0.00021130955,0.00016703189,0.000489129,0.00698219,0.0034099987,0.008601056,0.0015205366,0.00045067482],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005206084,0.00012002056,0.035654016,0.00014103923,0.000013900015,0.0016591208,0.8395568,0.00022421574,0.0013715493,0.0778967,0.0036287755,0.039681837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019080517,0.00019754193,0.0311845,0.00026290322,0.000018967596,0.0005785756,0.71621895,0.0007136609,0.00095894886,0.01728232,0.23252645,0.000038147075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048744576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015704025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058301156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031634036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006344796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02295214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}