{"meta":{"query_hash":"6bf2f47a43ef","filters":{"venue":"Current Urban Studies"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/6bf2f47a43ef","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Current+Urban+Studies"},"results":[{"id":"W1899052890","doi":"10.4236/cus.2015.33019","title":"An Indicator Model of the Spatial Quantification and Pattern Analysis of Urban Sustainability: A Case Study of Cincinnati, Ohio","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Urban Studies","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu","keywords":"Sustainability; Context (archaeology); Census; Urban sustainability; Regional science; Work (physics); Geography; Cartography; Computer science; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Engineering; Sociology; Population; Archaeology","score_opus":0.06369591442800684,"score_gpt":0.3166775915034316,"score_spread":0.25298167707542474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1899052890","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99864167,0.00070950366,0.00015967773,0.000024434778,0.000063219886,0.00035224977,0.000034728982,0.0000055185496,0.00000899537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99993193,0.000020484717,0.0000039353513,0.0000028603256,0.000010913526,0.000019979278,0.0000030303995,0.000004110679,0.0000027405356],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884564,0.00012097539,0.00038813188,0.00023952982,0.00030077877,0.00010494929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906,0.000036883077,0.00035520198,0.00040965117,0.00008659105,0.000051689593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041097097,0.00010384406,0.00035941388,0.000078573874,0.00007255395,0.000006000193,0.00017348648,0.000021639524,0.0000056117847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038424743,0.00006372458,0.00005226023,0.00037853487,0.00008955681,0.00010721949,0.00022589584,0.000044327327,4.3358835e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001148513,0.0005652682,0.9519974,0.00011692046,0.00026002055,0.0000013931088,0.04168781,0.003224279,0.000030249812,0.000004824857,0.0000725734,0.0020277798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009914198,0.00050233933,0.6865955,0.000037481776,0.0021750564,0.0000030488566,0.104967944,0.20391914,0.0004430927,0.00010345969,0.00003921028,0.00022231482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033738078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013610333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2654019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006797781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018154728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7594886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971466763","doi":"10.4236/cus.2014.24029","title":"Innovative Planning and New-Type Urbanization in China: The Case of Wuxi City in Jiangsu Province","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Urban Studies","topic":"China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Urbanization; China; Transformative learning; Environmental planning; Sustainability; Geography; Urban planning; Economic growth; Business; Civil engineering; Engineering; Sociology; Archaeology; Economics","score_opus":0.06150888609872402,"score_gpt":0.35847611275053654,"score_spread":0.2969672266518125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971466763","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98948175,0.0079094665,0.000035586567,0.00070502766,0.00031423493,0.00020424768,0.0000027036642,0.000008689828,0.0013382984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99907076,0.00045799345,0.000017623523,0.000023720539,0.00014351832,0.000004742065,8.719912e-7,0.0000037772536,0.000276983],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993365,0.00007070575,0.00021568454,0.00015387243,0.00007257026,0.00015070014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995314,0.00012285488,0.00017908122,0.00007915623,0.00006590882,0.00002160701],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005565906,0.00008295053,0.00019093028,0.000041095973,0.00018158552,0.000018255652,0.00008829453,0.000029591873,0.0000024939802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00064547115,0.000057095156,0.0000128611,0.00035815625,0.0002752213,0.00017066514,0.00007802619,0.00013584795,7.811947e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011438122,0.00002875433,0.8011303,0.00003165039,0.000011800295,0.000004150368,0.13740239,0.00002194092,0.0000019703905,0.04307925,0.0035061077,0.0147702405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007175957,0.00006974982,0.9346443,0.0002515044,0.000008545354,0.00000260744,0.020552937,0.00020472328,0.000021444748,0.009991877,0.033329237,0.00020551948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042864713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011161469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13351394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013938891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000101193626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6479891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916304525","doi":"10.4236/cus.2019.71002","title":"Development Value and Future Trend of Urban Underground Street","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Urban Studies","topic":"Underground infrastructure and sustainability","field":"Engineering","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Environmental science; Environmental planning; Civil engineering; Transport engineering; Business; Engineering; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.013984810663104117,"score_gpt":0.2458037787414646,"score_spread":0.2318189680783605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916304525","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9463333,0.048921432,0.00010830959,0.000044742123,0.0015808861,0.00021777031,0.000009006689,0.00010516335,0.0026794202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978738,0.0012439423,0.00039627447,0.000008607622,0.00026352901,0.000011939622,0.0000121812955,0.000019345383,0.00017039586],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990079,0.000020242413,0.00031021715,0.00022638458,0.00017582098,0.00025946612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995579,0.000058818518,0.000047710484,0.00021908681,0.00005946651,0.000057022127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009517623,0.0002348244,0.0003665235,0.00008138702,0.00007038944,0.000017845947,0.000081973245,0.00005658666,0.000025651672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010038613,0.00019625631,0.000051165072,0.00014545082,0.000092349845,0.00014185433,0.00008763218,0.00015494192,0.0000037463358],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006147297,0.00025377062,0.61301947,0.007918694,0.0023027295,0.000006955183,0.04714647,0.0006147875,0.00063880143,0.0850907,0.115488,0.12745818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00090686866,0.00008784485,0.10755426,0.00011687662,0.00008137778,0.0000025121253,0.016804576,0.0002070401,0.000567412,0.0025926125,0.8705075,0.00057116966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000015987504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022833938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7550194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015678101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031784748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}