{"meta":{"query_hash":"a465ae2856c1","filters":{"venue":"DOXA Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho"},"cohort_total":6,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":6,"exported":6,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/a465ae2856c1","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=DOXA+Cuadernos+de+Filosof%C3%ADa+del+Derecho"},"results":[{"id":"W1519123424","doi":"10.14198/doxa2008.31.23","title":"Valores y problemas de la democracia constitucional cosmopolita","year":2008,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"DOXA Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"WSP (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.04282536453676809,"score_gpt":0.3551379383358712,"score_spread":0.3123125737991031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1519123424","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.629255,0.0075411284,0.0047574136,0.0097628655,0.000980876,0.0015267885,0.0004946025,0.0005383473,0.345143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98670405,0.004897131,0.003822601,0.0010520774,0.0011906655,0.00018788545,0.000030457853,0.000050088645,0.002065062],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934764,0.00174768,0.0008459744,0.0009654296,0.0013898616,0.00157469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950455,0.0027713715,0.00040853396,0.0004844763,0.00061668403,0.0006734493],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014970191,0.0007135525,0.0008409005,0.00031492312,0.0032309894,0.00031786345,0.0010581062,0.000648086,0.00079274055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022128816,0.0007542953,0.0004537128,0.0008345634,0.008524787,0.00060660986,0.00039641466,0.0011146703,0.0011501131],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015958442,0.0007860682,0.32653812,0.00014862385,0.00053133257,0.00062928715,0.014906814,0.00032258895,0.00051543216,0.5782137,0.0762717,0.0009767463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031967817,0.00033074745,0.26848224,0.0012566954,0.0005297034,0.0014060565,0.0072499965,0.0013045273,0.001672685,0.20764545,0.50411093,0.0028141476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013282765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028922013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42783925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011947936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045162784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1523965003","doi":"10.14198/doxa2008.31.33","title":"Dogmática del hecho punible, principio de igualdad y justificación de segmentos de pena","year":2008,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"DOXA Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho","topic":"Criminal Law and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Discovery Air (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.05701503143665737,"score_gpt":0.3426051751638985,"score_spread":0.2855901437272411,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1523965003","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9129701,0.001233792,0.003973185,0.008634824,0.0005747066,0.0012615527,0.00035774082,0.0006295061,0.07036455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9624249,0.0049287435,0.010000453,0.0054417867,0.002800728,0.00021115065,0.0000683872,0.00021676687,0.013907097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99058515,0.0014908736,0.0012306256,0.0013402496,0.0014290817,0.003924027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945007,0.0011068438,0.0005503864,0.0012799801,0.0003642677,0.0021978102],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002286659,0.0010742641,0.0010473698,0.00047259362,0.0025220278,0.0007071508,0.0020717073,0.0014976282,0.0014240621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015067549,0.0011880518,0.0007263221,0.0012275316,0.0013113288,0.0006700567,0.00040981258,0.0017784724,0.0013906527],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017685426,0.0062425747,0.22032058,0.0027669517,0.0016034986,0.004991456,0.22687678,0.001236182,0.033274204,0.29382363,0.16459452,0.042501073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0056793513,0.0011610091,0.09302972,0.0014616721,0.0023248321,0.0028841197,0.015524795,0.010016968,0.027574154,0.029641978,0.80486846,0.0058329287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018982738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013844157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.640274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024925747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004572974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595850880","doi":"10.14198/doxa2007.30.06","title":"La regla hartiana de reconocimiento en el pensamiento garzoniano","year":2007,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"DOXA Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.036818597342257744,"score_gpt":0.38286650482407103,"score_spread":0.3460479074818133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595850880","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7293284,0.0043618884,0.009866518,0.008952846,0.0013941223,0.0011665795,0.00016800524,0.00041102484,0.24435063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883497,0.0023642452,0.0022621811,0.0013332115,0.0014329118,0.00007769792,0.000019844741,0.00006615542,0.0040940545],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930964,0.001469233,0.001033123,0.0011478022,0.001189148,0.0020642667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945316,0.002934932,0.0004888223,0.000658705,0.000533892,0.00085205486],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048661414,0.00072336604,0.00079358177,0.00045424228,0.0015067655,0.0005663825,0.0012666248,0.00080248964,0.00083115447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024020055,0.00080402585,0.00048644308,0.0010616384,0.0020220038,0.0007111115,0.00041580523,0.0011879749,0.0014369228],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000587757,0.0012635575,0.46468136,0.0003682474,0.0010187844,0.001040219,0.084267534,0.00020056813,0.0022346603,0.35441548,0.045919042,0.044002805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017944006,0.00026417815,0.28624412,0.0011948255,0.00040208412,0.00018981492,0.026030505,0.0006045823,0.003055514,0.021342555,0.6569479,0.001929532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028098004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004335088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61102885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022375947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015398421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112410071","doi":"10.14198/doxa2008.31.16","title":"Algunos aspectos de la metateoría de Principia iuris","year":2008,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"DOXA Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Domain (mathematical analysis); Mathematics","score_opus":0.042998497021014596,"score_gpt":0.35829624559932827,"score_spread":0.31529774857831366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112410071","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8365438,0.0073686903,0.005829753,0.0045074723,0.0006486643,0.0010793449,0.00018605575,0.000500305,0.14333591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832547,0.0071229306,0.004177342,0.0009307666,0.0009906354,0.0002190433,0.000016339387,0.0000702208,0.0032180375],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99284774,0.0022914123,0.000844465,0.0010337402,0.0011453716,0.0018372908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99538887,0.0024389378,0.0004392942,0.00062583096,0.00047760957,0.00062947406],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001983949,0.0007678218,0.00093895505,0.0003313552,0.0024662123,0.0003979917,0.0012985803,0.0006618988,0.000978945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002513112,0.0008150758,0.0005684476,0.0010623554,0.0040263957,0.00060736487,0.00043616325,0.0012817621,0.0014616785],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003725958,0.002034885,0.61846024,0.0002880634,0.0022936715,0.0021864178,0.08532866,0.0011074154,0.006083584,0.20410866,0.07063392,0.007101894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027484496,0.00031692075,0.44058472,0.0006344354,0.00079657935,0.0009502233,0.0066204295,0.0014809803,0.012743113,0.029293587,0.5013288,0.0025016996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029491058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036501957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43069494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016967794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038510882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2758821449","doi":"10.14198/doxa2017.40.08","title":"La filosofía del derecho de Alexandre Kojève","year":2017,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"DOXA Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Derecho","score_opus":0.06038519638070435,"score_gpt":0.3850644373788855,"score_spread":0.3246792409981812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2758821449","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55433905,0.00950991,0.0052588256,0.020930553,0.0023530643,0.0021174774,0.0008952797,0.0006862693,0.40390956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812617,0.0066860653,0.0028586006,0.0012349497,0.0022389065,0.0002722042,0.00003610245,0.00011640175,0.0052951123],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99134725,0.0016736608,0.0011538957,0.001678136,0.0017446824,0.0024023626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926752,0.0023089733,0.0011784864,0.0018982294,0.00089565647,0.0010434779],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024889114,0.0012113405,0.0013866393,0.00036842946,0.006863283,0.0025432287,0.0036399662,0.0012852479,0.0013596913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005385776,0.0012904406,0.0008096414,0.00050264644,0.005271697,0.0016311354,0.001284179,0.001968719,0.0020548734],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006467989,0.0017943447,0.553728,0.00066768826,0.002211581,0.0014072725,0.03241671,0.00033989782,0.0014087714,0.22655201,0.12578565,0.0530413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0043608244,0.0004199233,0.33035317,0.0027558557,0.0011122046,0.0003424516,0.012129051,0.0024624765,0.0028140838,0.064723216,0.5744761,0.0040506064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048801745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030915916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44869047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014541163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002974655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890494043","doi":"10.14198/doxa2018.41.03","title":"Describir normas: un enfoque pragmático","year":2018,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"DOXA Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho","topic":"Legal processes and jurisprudence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023017580433845025,"score_gpt":0.3127024937716843,"score_spread":0.2896849133378393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890494043","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5903361,0.0054967934,0.013288701,0.022315066,0.004039391,0.002184834,0.00028223955,0.0012261695,0.36083072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807574,0.0024614118,0.0034127804,0.0044486867,0.004471278,0.000071908195,0.0000188102,0.000118655786,0.004239075],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99384224,0.00061458984,0.0010234606,0.0011868969,0.001339757,0.001993052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962209,0.00053972274,0.00057340437,0.00092864654,0.00084331393,0.0008940328],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015676988,0.0007345204,0.00069168827,0.00023307554,0.0018398149,0.0012998602,0.0018583761,0.000998218,0.0031301784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014613959,0.00073741307,0.00036014582,0.0014052059,0.0015537709,0.0014171026,0.00042077925,0.0010868037,0.004620111],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012569901,0.00436257,0.122945204,0.0023941034,0.0016825881,0.0010080119,0.1616576,0.00006347675,0.008239503,0.24895874,0.15155564,0.29587558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021726203,0.0012011816,0.008941655,0.0010755785,0.0004842942,0.00012232062,0.005661767,0.0023211937,0.025859052,0.038521398,0.9110247,0.0026142295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004646172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009340519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7594691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048762016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013390123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}