{"meta":{"query_hash":"aec410b30a75","filters":{"venue":"DPCE Online"},"cohort_total":14,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"exported":14,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/aec410b30a75","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=DPCE+Online"},"results":[{"id":"W2620240063","doi":"","title":"CANADA, La Corte Suprema ha affermato che nella provincia dell’Alberta non vige alcun diritto costituzionale al bilinguismo legislativo","year":2017,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.013439073427374817,"score_gpt":0.30187980784953516,"score_spread":0.28844073442216034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620240063","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1030086,0.0039201267,0.0029231312,0.07593472,0.0015472103,0.0001456248,0.009532173,0.00066458125,0.80232376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40944517,0.0014160257,0.00346366,0.014289028,0.00015206545,0.00008516492,0.0023406,0.0001712678,0.568637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965533,0.00018764587,0.000071110764,0.0003589891,0.0016311208,0.0011978196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969451,0.00042501642,0.00014817932,0.00013741356,0.0018287749,0.0005155535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015653565,0.00038370123,0.0003685359,0.001993831,0.008704017,0.0066052387,0.0014912284,0.0017807608,0.032006435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003064075,0.00043634043,0.0006015621,0.0025048915,0.0027552277,0.00085251627,0.0017945025,0.0032255258,0.0021350342],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018831242,0.00007346815,0.04204821,0.00032522733,0.00017053065,0.0008116606,0.0069070347,0.0009534162,0.0039644777,0.44943655,0.42210028,0.073020875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043777836,0.000021772317,0.088541955,0.00012582821,0.00006690287,0.00016529541,0.00393354,0.00048501918,0.0012383196,0.0052761026,0.9000123,0.00008914391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.989037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9963658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050491333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050491333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.084469296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36634195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621555350","doi":"","title":"CANADA, La Corte Suprema apre la strada al suicidio assistito","year":2017,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Criminal Justice and Penology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.047545495572393674,"score_gpt":0.3618697693608454,"score_spread":0.31432427378845174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621555350","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.153154,0.0097744195,0.0013901197,0.28754604,0.0057146912,0.00042229114,0.01124323,0.0005945227,0.5301608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1887257,0.004510726,0.0017603834,0.02996611,0.00045633287,0.00008850442,0.0014870887,0.00013560308,0.77286947],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989231,0.000055365093,0.000021494634,0.00007327259,0.00037109462,0.000555542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824107,0.00015139428,0.00005671988,0.000036550904,0.0007875204,0.00072673353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005493213,0.0003897554,0.00031405868,0.0008598832,0.009599347,0.0037302084,0.0009840239,0.002441219,0.03172812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026339605,0.0003707206,0.00042294228,0.0009361436,0.0012390882,0.0008196188,0.0013957961,0.0049460656,0.0021965087],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024270348,0.00018776469,0.026602073,0.00025730266,0.00005733232,0.0018319191,0.0027809723,0.0004170723,0.0012655004,0.056476574,0.7995945,0.110286325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082956605,0.00007365812,0.060719088,0.00023037237,0.00004694299,0.00040542253,0.0052743354,0.0003274236,0.00075706036,0.002368473,0.929655,0.000059318983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98459953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99664474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0384277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0384277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13614234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27881378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2705872271","doi":"","title":"Canada. La Supreme Court conferma la legittimità costituzionale di alcune disposizioni dell’Anti-Terrorism Act del 2001","year":2017,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Supreme court; Humanities; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.057443398910410504,"score_gpt":0.34071983036960607,"score_spread":0.28327643145919557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2705872271","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012294205,0.007053547,0.0010353976,0.25277212,0.0073726648,0.0005703359,0.022537442,0.00034847748,0.69601583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07667812,0.0030501385,0.0018709459,0.16167033,0.00080879533,0.00037367496,0.0034812437,0.00017219852,0.75189465],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98972076,0.0004154967,0.00036687008,0.0007831563,0.005855044,0.0028587037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838064,0.0031810696,0.00038848442,0.00057249865,0.01013866,0.0019129771],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004310124,0.0009441539,0.00092300074,0.0021277273,0.017463302,0.009436722,0.0034214614,0.020716548,0.036114503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013340391,0.0016057173,0.001997549,0.0025412294,0.0030222205,0.0018870365,0.0019237604,0.016280187,0.0068251803],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008735976,0.000065782246,0.0024109017,0.0001234341,0.000038947048,0.0003433188,0.00039427687,0.00021850805,0.0005299651,0.06349388,0.92464286,0.007650801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014008959,0.000030519088,0.014835483,0.00044237444,0.00012112508,0.00012591232,0.0006408941,0.00048353238,0.0010284724,0.0047004707,0.9772987,0.0001524282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9830277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99321824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07341654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07341654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18827958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53267676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2774874957","doi":"","title":"Bobbitt’s Paradise: Canadian Constitutional Interpretation and Public Meaning Originalism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Constitution; Interpretation (philosophy); Original meaning; Constitutional interpretation; Constitutionalism; Original intent; Meaning (existential); Supreme court; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.05075330785836103,"score_gpt":0.3391241005377399,"score_spread":0.2883707926793789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2774874957","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0494848,0.020354213,0.004307319,0.41259876,0.0021197472,0.000040813593,0.0003091669,0.00007822415,0.51070696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9290722,0.005935098,0.0014349192,0.020849526,0.00040840707,0.000016989672,0.000092374634,0.000063326755,0.042127028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932775,0.0018128869,0.00014096384,0.00053560425,0.0029786443,0.0012544538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908476,0.004573178,0.00033376945,0.00041877507,0.0033076364,0.0005189669],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059678084,0.00029686763,0.0003997148,0.0025080054,0.020966668,0.011938994,0.0016829186,0.0046130065,0.006141665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014304251,0.00020172454,0.0003653341,0.0049526296,0.03919665,0.0041604554,0.0031314846,0.0075402865,0.00031979542],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011627198,0.0000044499466,0.0002977805,0.000044224962,0.0000042534725,0.00015350632,0.016845182,0.000109587025,0.00007371435,0.9388633,0.03712842,0.0064638783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018278111,0.000010186057,0.0039850334,0.00062277104,0.00002855721,0.00017381427,0.042163704,0.00072823267,0.00060263206,0.24306546,0.7084985,0.00010281413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94033253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9603889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08958781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08958781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07333722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6500081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782812234","doi":"","title":"PNR EU-Canada, la Corte di Giustizia blocca l’accordo: tra difesa dei diritti umani e implicazioni istituzionali","year":2018,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Human Rights and Immigration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.02394469672120847,"score_gpt":0.3006807070223689,"score_spread":0.2767360103011604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782812234","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03772852,0.007554412,0.0011482271,0.29709366,0.0035461423,0.00008234396,0.0017207671,0.00012641598,0.6509995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37222415,0.003577747,0.0021431728,0.09006817,0.0006527259,0.0001397896,0.0005419487,0.00031967653,0.5303327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992082,0.0008885326,0.00021134944,0.0007293429,0.002872353,0.0032165146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948702,0.0013525902,0.0002026417,0.00034097946,0.002000411,0.00123319],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004649274,0.00051740336,0.00059384597,0.0013916024,0.014742724,0.016447073,0.002160846,0.010871057,0.026601924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013643187,0.0004947678,0.00057669694,0.0029558407,0.0066015166,0.004599659,0.0058730594,0.012654644,0.0020710474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057689136,0.00005172908,0.00294145,0.000138175,0.000022596842,0.00027071818,0.009547032,0.00015364563,0.00036643245,0.67247117,0.29356173,0.020417672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029302055,0.000018299896,0.009832649,0.00031842486,0.000027961709,0.0000904572,0.008608945,0.00021343931,0.0004300755,0.01836493,0.96200436,0.000061156985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9407875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9627744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059212506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037835654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09958483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2745182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922517696","doi":"","title":"Giurisdizione religiosa: la questione islamica in Canada e Stati Uniti","year":2019,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Legal Studies and Policies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Pluralism (philosophy); Minority rights; Legal pluralism; Jurisdiction; Secularity; Religious pluralism; Law; Islam; Face (sociological concept); Sociology; Law and economics; Comparative law; Legal realism; Politics; Geography; Social science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.011016786552343526,"score_gpt":0.27433894996744707,"score_spread":0.26332216341510356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922517696","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6019212,0.017002419,0.0005913125,0.119821675,0.00051668286,0.00005038663,0.000375457,0.00003898106,0.2596819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.972347,0.0024589738,0.00021829952,0.0025199808,0.000033473643,0.0000054216443,0.000033616932,0.0000120062095,0.022371186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859315,0.00017270271,0.000023079463,0.000109225984,0.00049747556,0.0006042911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850094,0.00034045186,0.00011516459,0.00004796674,0.0004982563,0.0004972264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011093139,0.00015720914,0.00021761682,0.0009418955,0.019625865,0.0070762513,0.00078534253,0.0018129832,0.0058510476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027810454,0.0001579945,0.00011856346,0.002609337,0.01022406,0.00116896,0.0019593448,0.0026417607,0.00024664355],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006687855,0.00011503339,0.044291135,0.00017716734,0.000021751915,0.0012900396,0.17458448,0.00032558045,0.00089609413,0.6322878,0.06760901,0.078335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002035168,0.00003539826,0.098344184,0.0004379637,0.000025664764,0.0004933559,0.21508214,0.0009198244,0.000597744,0.016614974,0.66735184,0.00007656875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99211943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9962633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08520753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08520753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12564237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61822677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944789027","doi":"","title":"Judicial review of discriminatory laws in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Normative; Invisibility; Political science; Inequality; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02492551798569338,"score_gpt":0.33654670478875376,"score_spread":0.3116211868030604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944789027","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2221149,0.025527174,0.0045957323,0.25443706,0.002375612,0.00045203956,0.0010272289,0.00019922858,0.4892711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9231934,0.008093192,0.0018014215,0.029971184,0.0005193078,0.00006584777,0.00024222625,0.00003519418,0.036078244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9750397,0.0024198613,0.00097621616,0.0013115031,0.013842626,0.006410002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95134175,0.012843626,0.0022224698,0.0014139162,0.02864082,0.0035373755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012206229,0.00022987068,0.00066878996,0.003223287,0.01623022,0.008676978,0.0028691553,0.005239043,0.0019407609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05331365,0.00048079836,0.0003414296,0.004974883,0.0073523144,0.0014422444,0.0030454712,0.0053814813,0.00023135154],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000112043876,0.000085580585,0.01724257,0.00049873535,0.00010466092,0.0014151488,0.013979615,0.0028648798,0.001585779,0.6469618,0.2134936,0.10165555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013175627,0.000089253095,0.06269681,0.0010972432,0.00020135604,0.0003493637,0.010834581,0.0040374002,0.0031580594,0.05319606,0.8638886,0.0003195127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95179325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9767422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08935106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08935106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23854688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64829034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944849589","doi":"","title":"The Relations between Canada and Quebec: An Appraisal","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Political science; Secession; Supreme court; Law; CLARITY; Independence (probability theory); Politics","score_opus":0.014353927993335047,"score_gpt":0.3125900362392932,"score_spread":0.29823610824595814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944849589","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06756757,0.4453647,0.0008090939,0.10646849,0.0027034923,0.00022796275,0.007367575,0.00012170593,0.36936936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6972955,0.22342515,0.0013843239,0.020854354,0.000779849,0.00013747167,0.0023985286,0.00008932298,0.05363539],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99273926,0.00070349,0.00024405187,0.00041866925,0.0036164746,0.0022781275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889637,0.0013618183,0.00059818174,0.00021739495,0.0075339773,0.0013248391],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029468674,0.00083279493,0.0008208519,0.012492811,0.015236976,0.010395797,0.0029906384,0.002313148,0.013297522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007857874,0.00047093933,0.00081573904,0.025849879,0.0051247184,0.002106438,0.0022722743,0.002734859,0.0006100583],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034222618,0.00017377493,0.057294693,0.0059494474,0.00042465722,0.0025341534,0.018101677,0.0027602392,0.00078048895,0.26869908,0.3426232,0.3003164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030441528,0.000050575898,0.14900832,0.004841526,0.00018032095,0.0003107466,0.021444589,0.0005267723,0.00022611987,0.0032293252,0.82000476,0.00014650807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9988589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9993549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2679969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2679969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32827935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8490198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944851300","doi":"","title":"Canadian Rights: A jurisprudential Canadian “Style”?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fundamental rights; Charter; Political science; Law; Human rights; International human rights law; Federalism; Reservation of rights; Law and economics; Rights of Nature; Linguistic rights; Right to property; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.0099812534809071,"score_gpt":0.27586362770013045,"score_spread":0.26588237421922334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944851300","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062459297,0.013395163,0.0052302983,0.36174968,0.0044812327,0.000049463113,0.00032838347,0.00007700992,0.6084428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6690121,0.023078784,0.009269348,0.0945768,0.002430395,0.00011629439,0.00034370198,0.0002920262,0.2008806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921481,0.001221875,0.00014580014,0.0009638083,0.0039559957,0.0015643638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943797,0.0012161956,0.00016419675,0.00031275445,0.0031566618,0.00077043206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004550162,0.0005722877,0.0005376521,0.003296166,0.021648575,0.016475314,0.0025133863,0.0048452555,0.010263044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011712014,0.00039417803,0.00038824038,0.0057665887,0.03512411,0.006793798,0.0031692628,0.007882798,0.0008391365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005337566,0.0000036139104,0.00019553753,0.000026355538,0.000002698315,0.000026866921,0.004245163,0.00004890094,0.000048546677,0.9336671,0.053539444,0.008190437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010367227,0.0000070605647,0.0017837957,0.00024925306,0.000013688291,0.000065684064,0.009106259,0.0002585502,0.0001332387,0.10212593,0.88620037,0.000045797176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.974151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98252964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11298217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11298217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13519852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81974685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945873252","doi":"","title":"National security and counter-terrorism in Canada: past, present and future","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Legislator; Parliament; Legislation; Political science; National security; Counter terrorism; Law; Work (physics); Public administration; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.015302049352184419,"score_gpt":0.29744126424473827,"score_spread":0.28213921489255384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945873252","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14861864,0.35341483,0.0009208704,0.32212362,0.0016408777,0.00009088676,0.0031729257,0.00006520993,0.16995214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6937245,0.2648129,0.0019150992,0.017682804,0.00042038067,0.000045240628,0.00093890855,0.000035480058,0.02042472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959175,0.0004781388,0.00013042039,0.00025789693,0.0017481744,0.0014678494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865368,0.002910544,0.001195184,0.00020219843,0.007364923,0.0017903071],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030718208,0.00045714917,0.00067210617,0.005729149,0.0117988065,0.008756776,0.0016122313,0.0021128734,0.007439301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010928486,0.00033773723,0.00057365076,0.014028893,0.0080936765,0.0031330436,0.0027307668,0.0032150901,0.00027302004],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030085564,0.00014893191,0.092946924,0.0054032267,0.00027538932,0.0012132745,0.03340978,0.0022548363,0.00052583386,0.36657614,0.18170822,0.31523666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004416936,0.000075784366,0.1879031,0.007813244,0.0003253366,0.00036716906,0.097154684,0.0011338438,0.0007721672,0.0291302,0.6750058,0.000274613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9980362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24840444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24840444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34830946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87174433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946696988","doi":"","title":"Refractive and Prismatic Analysis in Implicit Comparative Constitutional Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutional law; Law; Section (typography); Comparative law; Political science; Law and economics; Common law; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03598531139458209,"score_gpt":0.35768702638174826,"score_spread":0.32170171498716615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946696988","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019364215,0.0036304235,0.07230457,0.017231995,0.00038811454,0.00006385123,0.00026501284,0.00012139537,0.8866304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9355454,0.002035214,0.019132437,0.0017596204,0.00029188945,0.00015427417,0.00019594138,0.00014032335,0.040744916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936486,0.003061515,0.00015065786,0.0006435216,0.0019194921,0.0005761333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948166,0.0028716994,0.0002722195,0.00086829736,0.0010114071,0.00015981485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006437011,0.0005053443,0.0004964534,0.0044887937,0.0064063156,0.0070928577,0.0024109774,0.0021162229,0.013713475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01702427,0.0004066991,0.0006805352,0.006134925,0.034556884,0.01296905,0.0058328165,0.0043967823,0.0007776275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.822684e-7,4.7064816e-7,0.00001286321,0.000005012325,4.777038e-7,0.0000026539722,0.00020799726,0.0000461582,0.0000054481325,0.9989856,0.00020888762,0.0005234921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006421773,0.0000026899272,0.0001090342,0.000034316137,0.000004062126,0.000012176439,0.0005664296,0.000515923,0.00006314322,0.9737768,0.024904722,0.000004325096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07638341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.082612485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07638341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01720631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012141541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15187764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2967729953","doi":"","title":"L’interculturalismo nel diritto costituzionale: una storia di parole","year":2019,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Minority Rights and Languages","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interculturalism; Multiculturalism; Accommodation; Pluralism (philosophy); Reasonable accommodation; Political science; Humanities; Constitutional court; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology; Constitution; Psychology","score_opus":0.01730697849315601,"score_gpt":0.30663214730396066,"score_spread":0.28932516881080467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2967729953","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09726777,0.0069424934,0.014536062,0.04430079,0.0008182768,0.000042457006,0.000060771974,0.00008410265,0.8359473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97628295,0.00096881046,0.0018386757,0.0019469388,0.0003708763,0.000045394696,0.000017673603,0.000058713737,0.018469919],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99364233,0.0036305941,0.000132277,0.00058751437,0.0011701508,0.0008370183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961583,0.0018485421,0.00034789467,0.0007662966,0.00042693617,0.0004520585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056627137,0.00027244227,0.00031860342,0.0011123901,0.005079242,0.010045822,0.0007607655,0.002001701,0.006036191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006982352,0.00021703167,0.00023838053,0.0010215669,0.017855234,0.00875738,0.00582463,0.005211887,0.00064555055],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014238872,0.000012641726,0.0006779535,0.00003424665,0.0000028309994,0.000096055446,0.012923208,0.000054142656,0.00032098612,0.97067505,0.00283915,0.012349488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023642431,0.00005435755,0.0062129395,0.0004853222,0.000013145976,0.00056588795,0.025608972,0.0010487834,0.0012508748,0.27811414,0.6865427,0.000079209036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008148406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011607134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010045822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040130615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030407407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029947639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114986408","doi":"","title":"The post-Brexit negotiations and the level playing field criterion","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Regional Development and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Brexit; Negotiation; Competition (biology); European union; Liberalization; Political science; International trade; Level playing field; Field (mathematics); Economics; State (computer science); International economics; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.07859376896161564,"score_gpt":0.3500228425865442,"score_spread":0.2714290736249286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3114986408","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29552424,0.00082559395,0.020600451,0.009813979,0.0002838713,0.00024051647,0.00016497319,0.000034988614,0.67251134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873912,0.000101072044,0.0020229628,0.00040364134,0.000051252046,0.00009867113,0.00006300527,0.000014877122,0.0098532485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918731,0.002557091,0.00033289817,0.000995125,0.0021257598,0.0021161276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98797774,0.005541566,0.0016502702,0.0007312234,0.00224306,0.0018560876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009151674,0.00033705033,0.0005806778,0.0023659302,0.007044327,0.009378953,0.001583544,0.0044801338,0.015541204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02045794,0.00022954305,0.00054584787,0.0014063517,0.011755952,0.0072944895,0.0048160884,0.0062728054,0.0011237074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006324117,0.00005194799,0.0012800196,0.0000140990405,0.000005692563,0.00015672579,0.0009326006,0.00043734311,0.00011375065,0.9914757,0.0014454024,0.0040234667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011385177,0.00024424004,0.009660848,0.00025401157,0.000012578101,0.00027224788,0.008759169,0.005419441,0.0006423672,0.9388837,0.0356801,0.000057502155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005276156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004093517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015541204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064524994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066990894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05199051},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135453247","doi":"","title":"Indipendenza senza autonomia. I delicati rapporti fra potere esecutivo e giudiziario in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Executive branch; Political science; Politics; Government (linguistics); Law; Constitutional law; Executive power; Power (physics); Autonomy; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.033204021030256194,"score_gpt":0.283810711327999,"score_spread":0.2506066902977428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135453247","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41641986,0.010655511,0.0022197473,0.09957691,0.00043475197,0.000080443424,0.0009062962,0.000080219565,0.46962625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96483195,0.0016428918,0.00040943373,0.003149071,0.000047578105,0.000009652712,0.000077115095,0.000033183336,0.0297991],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99518085,0.00050597504,0.00008218031,0.0006871503,0.001604434,0.0019393713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949885,0.0011170403,0.00049887743,0.00016775295,0.0019136086,0.0013141771],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028221284,0.00019704818,0.00037379953,0.0020188477,0.016137913,0.0072895535,0.0009661001,0.0013391249,0.008442816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006430771,0.00028544824,0.00025161752,0.003328062,0.010524686,0.0013224643,0.0022836863,0.0038447855,0.00039340078],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094458344,0.000060932012,0.04339204,0.000207331,0.00005661966,0.00085734774,0.04546973,0.0007768973,0.0011672279,0.7724908,0.070916,0.064510696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005146029,0.000053495696,0.24615139,0.00053201494,0.000120764285,0.00033800388,0.053192712,0.0018284145,0.0011904933,0.039561305,0.65682346,0.00015648046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9897385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99682117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.096079625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.096079625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11676606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6971097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}