{"meta":{"query_hash":"aec410b30a75","filters":{"venue":"DPCE Online"},"cohort_total":14,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"exported":14,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/aec410b30a75","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=DPCE+Online"},"results":[{"id":"W2620240063","doi":"","title":"CANADA, La Corte Suprema ha affermato che nella provincia dell’Alberta non vige alcun diritto costituzionale al bilinguismo legislativo","year":2017,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.013439073427374817,"score_gpt":0.30187980784953516,"score_spread":0.28844073442216034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620240063","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5850034,0.0010307946,0.00009824309,0.024488807,0.0029097165,0.0013229933,0.0013489666,0.00006751611,0.3837296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9297571,0.00019379641,0.00022286671,0.0027689983,0.0012421984,0.000015739382,0.00037180004,0.00005049334,0.06537699],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99669844,0.0002597427,0.000564008,0.0007228602,0.00096380163,0.00079113164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972674,0.00043425715,0.0006033007,0.0008970093,0.0003924765,0.00040552075],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054301467,0.00044918942,0.00054693467,0.000073853815,0.0014201266,0.0006255036,0.0011749929,0.00028322326,0.0006847591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017012585,0.00042292973,0.00020335628,0.00016416168,0.0005306963,0.0007134148,0.00026496488,0.00054993934,0.00015210643],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013079996,0.0043055774,0.09725901,0.00090016937,0.0016640314,0.0039666593,0.19435084,0.00040511964,0.013136227,0.034640938,0.60017616,0.047887243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084310543,0.000121861005,0.01326262,0.00038356942,0.0001505166,0.000017408236,0.0011698958,0.009815124,0.000772366,0.00007426267,0.9727052,0.0006841012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94698215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9856949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.372529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048086213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003989662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621555350","doi":"","title":"CANADA, La Corte Suprema apre la strada al suicidio assistito","year":2017,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Criminal Justice and Penology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.047545495572393674,"score_gpt":0.3618697693608454,"score_spread":0.31432427378845174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621555350","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83914644,0.00056659733,0.000022395534,0.05259504,0.0030518395,0.0002635647,0.0017548057,0.000048991653,0.1025503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97547334,0.000645899,0.00014997301,0.0012697503,0.0014181968,0.00000324873,0.00011592599,0.000025231273,0.020898443],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99761045,0.0003323429,0.00030459996,0.00048287245,0.00059698615,0.0006727208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979163,0.00055616756,0.0003309917,0.0007224005,0.00014888952,0.00032526266],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054466526,0.00027155285,0.00042607545,0.00004007231,0.001333622,0.00035027863,0.0011412471,0.00033309162,0.0009156617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079056364,0.00027589579,0.000108113185,0.00008566228,0.0008233351,0.00021757458,0.00021406787,0.0005540906,0.00007527266],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049466634,0.0017228376,0.061001778,0.00049633323,0.00059745763,0.006823316,0.011149033,0.0000825355,0.0017024264,0.066137716,0.7313437,0.11844822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042366082,0.000092323346,0.12756814,0.00008860916,0.00027271887,0.000028524753,0.007375803,0.00017832224,0.000030453612,0.00010935972,0.8634797,0.00035238685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95277995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13632686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018315179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033237475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2705872271","doi":"","title":"Canada. La Supreme Court conferma la legittimità costituzionale di alcune disposizioni dell’Anti-Terrorism Act del 2001","year":2017,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Supreme court; Humanities; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.057443398910410504,"score_gpt":0.34071983036960607,"score_spread":0.28327643145919557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2705872271","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7752118,0.001505801,0.00018815798,0.14724536,0.004249127,0.000887574,0.0025659357,0.00012395732,0.06802228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96518034,0.003110324,0.00019551435,0.0009268106,0.0014365562,0.000012753127,0.00022645952,0.000049222497,0.028862018],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957674,0.00040810916,0.00062814547,0.00076590304,0.0012765992,0.0011538415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99650526,0.0007804708,0.00054583355,0.0010138645,0.00041607695,0.0007384665],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011978723,0.0005089465,0.0006860759,0.00006053007,0.002454411,0.0007564004,0.0018071881,0.00040483897,0.00074242946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000938272,0.0005012758,0.00022476021,0.00014951767,0.0013346951,0.0008696808,0.0004074294,0.00069411175,0.00014602186],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047483385,0.0027061435,0.10561672,0.0003743713,0.0005374824,0.003155329,0.0048249373,0.00045498792,0.002111069,0.05162205,0.8138276,0.014294491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005925538,0.000060559578,0.10011264,0.00041432364,0.00023044679,0.000042607455,0.0011573025,0.0017878953,0.00011500245,0.00012422031,0.89472467,0.0006377896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81819934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9034094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18996854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037164494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004385965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2774874957","doi":"","title":"Bobbitt’s Paradise: Canadian Constitutional Interpretation and Public Meaning Originalism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Constitution; Interpretation (philosophy); Original meaning; Constitutional interpretation; Constitutionalism; Original intent; Meaning (existential); Supreme court; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.05075330785836103,"score_gpt":0.3391241005377399,"score_spread":0.2883707926793789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2774874957","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2899445,0.001409334,0.0005255587,0.09224321,0.0015052042,0.0002782146,0.00026580226,0.000089693924,0.6137385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99830204,0.00019297133,0.00022051009,0.000568768,0.0004342344,0.0000053507238,0.00002987137,0.0000019354507,0.00024429278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993053,0.00003179832,0.0000972539,0.00014412764,0.00018767815,0.00023381431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994725,0.000035454756,0.00006528025,0.00008892568,0.000121971316,0.0002158984],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019645205,0.000067839595,0.00009442235,0.00005301559,0.003156249,0.00022381319,0.00017044373,0.000047411755,0.00009987268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058522564,0.00006556073,0.000024183975,0.000046385387,0.0021767947,0.00035322912,0.00003488654,0.00008032676,0.000023569883],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033197814,0.000012528475,0.025229767,0.0000011885595,0.000016010647,0.000009319786,0.00070382614,0.0000012866502,0.0000029274158,0.96685725,0.0006652239,0.006497365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024079366,0.000013812664,0.05890482,0.000046105957,0.00002226129,0.0000061147675,0.002032607,0.00019490282,0.0000013653342,0.045243703,0.89310205,0.00019146451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32557237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9216135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001219388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087755104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782812234","doi":"","title":"PNR EU-Canada, la Corte di Giustizia blocca l’accordo: tra difesa dei diritti umani e implicazioni istituzionali","year":2018,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Human Rights and Immigration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.02394469672120847,"score_gpt":0.3006807070223689,"score_spread":0.2767360103011604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782812234","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93155617,0.0008547637,0.00035871152,0.019163484,0.0031852063,0.0009226672,0.0012685008,0.00021159717,0.042478897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94024205,0.00045646308,0.00026781578,0.0021432526,0.005569016,0.000015030649,0.00035701558,0.0000551932,0.05089418],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960439,0.00033476777,0.00082098565,0.0008171531,0.0010538907,0.00092929654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978017,0.00026940517,0.000403683,0.000560926,0.000476575,0.00048768296],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056025304,0.00048419586,0.0005612798,0.00011059182,0.0018319956,0.0003473805,0.0007633021,0.0003536394,0.004167346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017185567,0.00041309663,0.00020486461,0.0005440396,0.0011542942,0.0003778847,0.00011778706,0.0004777024,0.00045065716],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003671576,0.0034388208,0.009915697,0.000190287,0.00060870335,0.00033224598,0.018734265,0.000034988672,0.0034070562,0.34629616,0.5665908,0.050083842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062868546,0.0002588507,0.06558732,0.00014340982,0.00014918437,0.000011493799,0.0012698523,0.0011136003,0.00008090802,0.0011082493,0.92901516,0.00063327444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3220459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9051391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5830932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003921774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017175641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922517696","doi":"","title":"Giurisdizione religiosa: la questione islamica in Canada e Stati Uniti","year":2019,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Legal Studies and Policies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Pluralism (philosophy); Minority rights; Legal pluralism; Jurisdiction; Secularity; Religious pluralism; Law; Islam; Face (sociological concept); Sociology; Law and economics; Comparative law; Legal realism; Politics; Geography; Social science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.011016786552343526,"score_gpt":0.27433894996744707,"score_spread":0.26332216341510356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922517696","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8981257,0.0013050629,0.0000024842627,0.034113668,0.0011517339,0.00035281532,0.00065368577,0.000033406264,0.06426144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97235626,0.0061741825,0.00010606592,0.0017697631,0.00047676277,0.0000052215923,0.000080076155,0.00002171951,0.01900992],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978266,0.00032353925,0.00041340804,0.00029997478,0.0005195831,0.0006168918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989437,0.00041938285,0.00015421682,0.00022988237,0.00012458244,0.00012824501],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035125736,0.00022319106,0.00040049068,0.000069038215,0.00023292666,0.000058498455,0.00030485462,0.00012377108,0.00047902678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015200861,0.00021397135,0.00005556495,0.00069095957,0.00018898385,0.0001366213,0.00012703055,0.00039886934,0.00015165837],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026657354,0.001362882,0.18183376,0.0003979044,0.00034702016,0.00034571465,0.11294663,0.0016706515,0.00027066746,0.25881344,0.42886236,0.012882385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063772005,0.00007740563,0.065143846,0.00018895308,0.000022620387,0.0000017144085,0.016022997,0.00030344384,0.0000085056845,0.00068201794,0.9165432,0.00036756907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99703443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48768082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086182845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022821047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87254983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944789027","doi":"","title":"Judicial review of discriminatory laws in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Normative; Invisibility; Political science; Inequality; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02492551798569338,"score_gpt":0.33654670478875376,"score_spread":0.3116211868030604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944789027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66670656,0.0015188354,0.0000018646657,0.011640442,0.000576651,0.00031582956,0.000071423034,0.000014124086,0.31915426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99402744,0.0015498444,0.00004256684,0.002957588,0.000052325697,0.000002059281,0.000027343367,0.0000039061156,0.0013369077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991159,0.000115970906,0.00021459043,0.000092866714,0.00032201043,0.0001386604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967265,0.000044148295,0.00006946304,0.00010674438,0.00005709083,0.000049897662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040972617,0.000044846256,0.0001619103,0.000023235283,0.000025620435,0.0000034625518,0.00015007985,0.00002177219,0.0008699688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001565676,0.000042866166,0.000027814436,0.00017341858,0.000049471793,0.00007030439,0.000019953415,0.000060200113,0.000018439434],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018167975,0.00038619494,0.0474482,0.003273654,0.000013836316,0.0000130667295,0.0064995303,0.0000039897386,0.000080298356,0.8792493,0.01829907,0.044714715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006134798,0.00004277546,0.15122387,0.0042768028,0.000029979528,2.8187722e-7,0.010802007,0.000031823456,0.00007800736,0.0044738716,0.82806385,0.0003632248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93980503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9946142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8747754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017502873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009860436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9525548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944849589","doi":"","title":"The Relations between Canada and Quebec: An Appraisal","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Political science; Secession; Supreme court; Law; CLARITY; Independence (probability theory); Politics","score_opus":0.014353927993335047,"score_gpt":0.3125900362392932,"score_spread":0.29823610824595814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944849589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9817051,0.00009388809,0.000008636914,0.0075840894,0.0002251646,0.00007362409,0.00008764209,0.000012226492,0.01020958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9753642,0.0000051358024,0.000031764455,0.00012208943,0.00039139172,0.0000011613939,0.0000087588505,0.0000028242007,0.024072679],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942356,0.00006514237,0.00008297772,0.00008069948,0.00017828928,0.00016935448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938345,0.00036173136,0.000032584237,0.00009526789,0.00002245763,0.00010448297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018620797,0.00003376436,0.00005780209,0.0000030392405,0.00026598177,0.00003842923,0.000099081975,0.000030280136,0.000028452545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019821785,0.00002327628,0.000008835507,0.000053184467,0.00007287464,0.000085780826,0.000013858999,0.00006396621,0.000010617524],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012645503,0.000010518819,0.515033,0.0000024243507,0.000006595136,7.1662e-7,0.0005258406,0.0000016954996,0.0000067924684,0.47563565,0.0037486479,0.005026853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032330736,0.0000043435098,0.44283855,0.0000032150317,0.0000015444334,6.0059385e-8,0.00024254876,0.000020488269,4.8453217e-7,0.00026718035,0.5565619,0.000027389407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9960577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55281323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000063438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038775563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20457436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944851300","doi":"","title":"Canadian Rights: A jurisprudential Canadian “Style”?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fundamental rights; Charter; Political science; Law; Human rights; International human rights law; Federalism; Reservation of rights; Law and economics; Rights of Nature; Linguistic rights; Right to property; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.0099812534809071,"score_gpt":0.27586362770013045,"score_spread":0.26588237421922334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944851300","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.420027,0.0003299599,0.0000019086933,0.01890908,0.0013877382,0.00025579674,0.00036528267,0.000047592366,0.55867565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944379,0.000052478816,0.000059142345,0.0014138996,0.0007528923,0.0000037637956,0.00004697582,0.0000040169234,0.0032289375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893785,0.000036120447,0.00010538041,0.00016608281,0.00023320733,0.0005213443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992661,0.000021801465,0.000022700002,0.00009221897,0.00009198463,0.0005051842],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015694587,0.00007984481,0.00011358421,0.00012235717,0.0009801342,0.000048222548,0.00020817727,0.00008056016,0.0017512328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003900701,0.00007526349,0.00004887555,0.0002495758,0.00015511064,0.00009893671,0.00001802413,0.000102088874,0.0012938452],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008553114,0.000055530534,0.054387763,0.000003620606,0.000060916656,0.00007855571,0.0031086667,0.0000073791584,0.000017446706,0.9205976,0.017854106,0.003819846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010643162,0.00001102385,0.017297145,0.000011938722,0.000008919387,7.897718e-7,0.0008073683,0.0000072180082,0.0000019368747,0.0036178452,0.97800314,0.00012621701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9991854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96014905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005059032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021084643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99948376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945873252","doi":"","title":"National security and counter-terrorism in Canada: past, present and future","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Legislator; Parliament; Legislation; Political science; National security; Counter terrorism; Law; Work (physics); Public administration; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.015302049352184419,"score_gpt":0.29744126424473827,"score_spread":0.28213921489255384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945873252","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96448797,0.00043619386,3.356783e-7,0.031246642,0.00019898874,0.00008824844,0.00003847997,0.0000046076498,0.0034985095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982566,0.0001596087,0.00002943392,0.00033310315,0.0009333607,0.0000013946816,0.000008938126,0.0000020665507,0.0002754777],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993849,0.000032655087,0.0000754029,0.00012002289,0.00026779834,0.000119219454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99978215,0.00005417808,0.00002234996,0.000039322967,0.000045058485,0.00005697472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001713741,0.000044529268,0.0000719117,0.000015751903,0.000055277753,0.000019334566,0.000057983798,0.000030190866,0.00007713951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001056751,0.00004096557,0.000006230819,0.0000555194,0.00004090776,0.00010852324,0.000028457425,0.0000783994,0.0000019224767],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013826533,0.0002905419,0.8042496,0.00024194036,0.000029478859,0.00008582156,0.035601173,0.000027253851,0.00011750952,0.053349018,0.084225126,0.02164426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002043642,0.000017682794,0.18402904,0.00002632542,0.0000033245194,0.0000027756803,0.011401336,0.0004689034,0.0000023242167,0.0015626452,0.8021811,0.00010016268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7833065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9750227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.717956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012451467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004022367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2181365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946696988","doi":"","title":"Refractive and Prismatic Analysis in Implicit Comparative Constitutional Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutional law; Law; Section (typography); Comparative law; Political science; Law and economics; Common law; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03598531139458209,"score_gpt":0.35768702638174826,"score_spread":0.32170171498716615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946696988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82309896,0.00029971616,0.000121507335,0.0015662279,0.00006516277,0.00018538172,0.00005551346,0.000017192966,0.17459035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990657,0.00004462408,0.0002509316,0.00034606975,0.000060180715,0.000005722125,0.00002603202,8.5578506e-7,0.00019989956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930704,0.00006621039,0.00013939478,0.00015585395,0.00018992042,0.00014161227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996131,0.00016673902,0.000052583873,0.00005002937,0.00007386111,0.000043678796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017381713,0.00006575046,0.00022789108,0.00007379875,0.00023900844,0.000019750263,0.000061662875,0.000038739712,0.00012405607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031723797,0.000058522855,0.000039204962,0.0004848027,0.0010607508,0.00013098704,0.000033737884,0.00008914423,0.000046758505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012273051,0.000072351046,0.057486933,0.0000015695662,0.00011547442,0.0000018926424,0.0022204104,0.00006977028,0.000029681953,0.93987405,0.000028959506,0.000086638014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001180041,0.00008829445,0.76609427,0.00007832785,0.0003406167,0.000002398102,0.030583447,0.0009550819,0.000032260614,0.10910528,0.09102581,0.00051419454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007998527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054575074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83076876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007052378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010623469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2967729953","doi":"","title":"L’interculturalismo nel diritto costituzionale: una storia di parole","year":2019,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Minority Rights and Languages","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interculturalism; Multiculturalism; Accommodation; Pluralism (philosophy); Reasonable accommodation; Political science; Humanities; Constitutional court; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology; Constitution; Psychology","score_opus":0.01730697849315601,"score_gpt":0.30663214730396066,"score_spread":0.28932516881080467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2967729953","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93649566,0.0025529522,0.000009591918,0.01180604,0.004326969,0.00061633723,0.00077030616,0.0001299066,0.04329221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8168606,0.0008144028,0.00014138072,0.0008710339,0.0033276975,0.000006053069,0.00040725837,0.00002588682,0.17754568],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974486,0.00021508166,0.00040068035,0.0005734837,0.000717866,0.0006442503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986776,0.00016751891,0.0001959916,0.00044208483,0.00020987779,0.00030692393],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003606866,0.000331131,0.0004609579,0.00006434195,0.00039869524,0.0002119601,0.00063782505,0.0003042785,0.010005016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011255321,0.00024387929,0.00021525448,0.0003678021,0.00028067981,0.00037093725,0.00014277351,0.0004245608,0.0018457976],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043465634,0.005298944,0.053097647,0.00067681767,0.00089018,0.00034371117,0.14992404,0.00018627677,0.010295434,0.4372364,0.30541077,0.036205135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006598202,0.00012451888,0.010014847,0.00021128822,0.000066871165,0.000004429521,0.008054733,0.00029264143,0.00007002066,0.00042697875,0.9795947,0.00047911837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009794637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044871657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67418396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016770023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016873068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114986408","doi":"","title":"The post-Brexit negotiations and the level playing field criterion","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Regional Development and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Brexit; Negotiation; Competition (biology); European union; Liberalization; Political science; International trade; Level playing field; Field (mathematics); Economics; State (computer science); International economics; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.07859376896161564,"score_gpt":0.3500228425865442,"score_spread":0.2714290736249286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3114986408","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.123293236,0.0002164273,0.00008458889,0.86934316,0.00012907486,0.0001322707,0.000013252059,0.000026990618,0.006761009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9747498,0.0006058778,0.00039437183,0.022441054,0.00061442656,0.0000040847967,0.000015038553,0.000004293778,0.0011710533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99955016,0.000060702983,0.000082201776,0.000067743036,0.00013015166,0.000109017805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943995,0.0003953097,0.000029923835,0.000046328427,0.000039083076,0.00004937962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017064696,0.000041139287,0.00004889633,0.000007933253,0.00092867756,0.00009600693,0.00014956274,0.000028694227,0.00003681522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055140426,0.000022763279,0.000024900006,0.00010676741,0.00015445924,0.00007152659,0.000040806342,0.00007956587,0.00001571572],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013129495,0.000022864326,0.002735556,0.000009544655,0.000033089444,0.0000026592957,0.11036669,0.000003431179,0.00027202905,0.84544545,0.016467841,0.024509534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00094381283,0.00004723325,0.06750278,0.00002500632,0.000018529567,0.0000019488875,0.011404712,0.00041474117,0.000019515091,0.015111577,0.904335,0.00017511887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017936489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022854148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88786715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010068075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009557137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7142731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135453247","doi":"","title":"Indipendenza senza autonomia. I delicati rapporti fra potere esecutivo e giudiziario in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Executive branch; Political science; Politics; Government (linguistics); Law; Constitutional law; Executive power; Power (physics); Autonomy; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.033204021030256194,"score_gpt":0.283810711327999,"score_spread":0.2506066902977428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135453247","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8966561,0.005125699,0.00004367588,0.04776359,0.0019322282,0.00041553265,0.0012034858,0.000055845227,0.046803847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98916304,0.0016086943,0.00021710839,0.0056741186,0.00080224464,0.000015301152,0.00017999821,0.000016487045,0.0023230235],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968621,0.0002285108,0.00073380675,0.00065055536,0.000735134,0.0007898976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986912,0.0001807684,0.00025322448,0.00029639425,0.0002988902,0.0002795019],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003317029,0.0003186816,0.00058474485,0.00007198846,0.00064651686,0.00007858867,0.00042907364,0.00020146863,0.0011230202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033552563,0.00033868945,0.00012992062,0.0009949977,0.00041036398,0.00016556082,0.00030987788,0.00055161864,0.000068361085],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021264923,0.0036401206,0.62175566,0.00015472455,0.0012709242,0.005909863,0.021801475,0.0013544112,0.0003963877,0.16353075,0.09103799,0.088935025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001336816,0.000043190827,0.2630239,0.00027905748,0.000118050746,0.000023460543,0.03817951,0.00057536,0.00017082022,0.0037603998,0.6914758,0.001013603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9798794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99854875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6004378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015707983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02078927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}