{"meta":{"query_hash":"b4007ccb13d4","filters":{"venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies"},"cohort_total":95,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":95,"exported":95,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/b4007ccb13d4","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Dalhousie+journal+of+legal+studies"},"results":[{"id":"W1749212531","doi":"","title":"Stories of 0s: Transgender Women, Monstrous Bodies, and the Canadian Prison System","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Transgender; Jurisprudence; Law; Sociology; Criminology; Context (archaeology); Political science; Criminal law; Gender studies; History","score_opus":0.029952102075931845,"score_gpt":0.29853962858674,"score_spread":0.26858752651080814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1749212531","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8699719,0.053980105,0.00018095158,0.012883455,0.0027260573,0.000562009,0.000022977707,0.00004510324,0.059627492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980145,0.0008373864,0.000041684772,0.00009334675,0.00063202495,0.000006973034,8.61343e-8,0.00000950698,0.00036448136],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980511,0.00036586722,0.0005556113,0.000105265215,0.0005788366,0.00034329365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982637,0.00031241827,0.00048788442,0.00008820599,0.0006575961,0.0001901977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031205146,0.00013231338,0.00063260493,0.00010075716,0.0011867647,0.00011987434,0.00025130727,0.00007280048,0.00000327061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00070460635,0.000079804224,0.000091429654,0.00014274321,0.0010998886,0.00029318835,0.000027021522,0.00021283282,9.117721e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000311018,0.00004439157,0.009368723,0.0005988228,0.0010293537,0.000033804718,0.6981804,0.00004261649,0.000026905962,0.28114787,0.004223137,0.0049929935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017545304,0.00031923928,0.0017849792,0.00037563764,0.00018035407,0.00004830395,0.39445966,0.000010090083,0.000053468048,0.002222474,0.5985407,0.00025051198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31306297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70004284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5943176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034221145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005656207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9127754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1767010817","doi":"","title":"'The Melancholy Truth': Corrective and Equitable Justice for Omar Khadr","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Harm; Law; Constructive trust; Sociology; Appeal; Order (exchange); Proposition; Government (linguistics); Principal (computer security); Faith; Repatriation; Law and economics; Remedial education; Political science; Economics; Philosophy; History; Theology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.056058050570153686,"score_gpt":0.38319732613740065,"score_spread":0.327139275567247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1767010817","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6689311,0.09421959,0.0048633963,0.08141429,0.021235613,0.001183354,0.000028527207,0.00010981011,0.12801431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937181,0.0027820289,0.0004464161,0.00021166955,0.0010854023,0.000006636768,9.129741e-8,0.000008300546,0.001741386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987353,0.00015391901,0.00030093643,0.00011235069,0.00035430555,0.00034320122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99567646,0.0032616416,0.00028703717,0.000074333664,0.000600265,0.00010028424],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030305122,0.00010025969,0.00028043461,0.000032788223,0.0020648944,0.0001667444,0.0002336735,0.00003827157,0.0000031634381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058694575,0.000064511376,0.00008861356,0.00010282626,0.00046988775,0.00039112577,0.00007632168,0.00015658113,0.000002822033],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011987359,0.0001287652,0.0018186067,0.00026836066,0.0007474053,0.000040121853,0.06710765,0.000078655365,0.0002590055,0.6352127,0.15796871,0.13517126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048446574,0.0005186899,0.0009824712,0.00010914919,0.00037117835,0.000028492927,0.052489195,0.00003539479,0.00006949747,0.01243908,0.932331,0.00014137826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028344613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016175174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77436227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000073009265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000087900444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99923426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1798632713","doi":"","title":"Cost of Admission: One Rubber Stamp - Evaluating the Significance of Investigative Necessity in Wiretap Authorizations after R v Araujo","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Supreme court; Law; Authorization; Legislature; Political science; Judicial deference; Computer security; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.20227030998609552,"score_gpt":0.424135452960932,"score_spread":0.2218651429748365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1798632713","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9831765,0.002376909,0.000089073794,0.01293981,0.00019359698,0.00035229858,0.0000067124433,0.0000045488473,0.0008605467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99818623,0.00038561597,0.00085340696,0.000116574534,0.00012953684,0.000022070073,2.182952e-7,0.000005760853,0.00030055828],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997695,0.0005263903,0.00068548473,0.000112829846,0.0007757214,0.00020453834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99715805,0.00075067335,0.0007820275,0.000114026625,0.0010929322,0.00010226669],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002131422,0.00010708444,0.0004027314,0.00006994853,0.00027335912,0.00004112504,0.00029909477,0.0000459998,0.00010971525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003001216,0.000070516224,0.00008990227,0.00045884345,0.0011334415,0.0006318929,0.00009043614,0.00026164413,0.0000029612183],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00072832097,0.0009423363,0.18897848,0.00058487186,0.00078669935,0.000052092517,0.72417426,0.0021224215,0.027400201,0.02209778,0.0075594652,0.024573106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001259857,0.0015105364,0.7474136,0.0034588287,0.0005179905,0.000009020806,0.19671747,0.00027817884,0.010002433,0.029261854,0.009003554,0.0005666869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029970484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027746572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55843514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000095372525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004365152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45306605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1834797527","doi":"","title":"A Case Study on the Legal Impacts of Corporate Sustainability Pledges in the Alberta Oil Sands","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Oil sands; Sustainability; Business; Natural resource economics; Economics; Geography; Asphalt","score_opus":0.074646981191422,"score_gpt":0.33936716133451783,"score_spread":0.26472018014309584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1834797527","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9683589,0.00075607654,5.3430546e-7,0.023798242,0.00020851179,0.00041322215,0.000002430117,0.000005218931,0.0064568613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997618,0.00020204273,0.0000046741684,0.00031426045,0.00025082284,0.000021136719,1.03865055e-7,0.000008534741,0.0015803956],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968816,0.001149435,0.00070095685,0.00015506559,0.0007301552,0.0003828117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996642,0.0013159515,0.00068614766,0.0002651643,0.0009994886,0.00009126603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039530224,0.0001950281,0.0005089314,0.000114542454,0.0007437854,0.00022298323,0.0005856505,0.000047981022,0.000045941877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023806102,0.00007577383,0.00015994623,0.00055168953,0.000713315,0.00060761214,0.00010437857,0.00051913905,0.000005060993],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006708311,0.00449392,0.11079488,0.00015108752,0.0012268,0.009163764,0.7722153,0.000093972994,0.000111555055,0.067796946,0.022287315,0.010993596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020488251,0.0031180382,0.04779579,0.00013901138,0.00019282513,0.0007877071,0.8860156,0.000016307482,0.00008868687,0.004248218,0.05518534,0.00036367364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11243164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.106522955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11380025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018506993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043435948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9097807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1847878306","doi":"","title":"A Canadian Solution: Recent Developments in the Law of Directors’ Duties in the Context of Financially Distressed Corporations","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Creditor; Insolvency; Duty; Corporation; Law; Context (archaeology); Companies Act; Shareholder; Corporate law; Commonwealth; Business; Business judgment rule; Supreme court; Accounting; Corporate governance; Political science; Finance; Debt","score_opus":0.05785189667741133,"score_gpt":0.330934282237167,"score_spread":0.27308238555975567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1847878306","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8359091,0.00483467,0.000024096751,0.110433675,0.00027326867,0.000578363,0.00008430434,0.0000053921717,0.04785713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998165,0.0010871643,0.0001358618,0.00043221362,0.000094083116,0.000011788028,0.0000014036536,0.0000025944044,0.00006990616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872696,0.0001865685,0.0005014934,0.00005898098,0.00035973644,0.00016625627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989715,0.00021795859,0.00034504852,0.00008461531,0.0003475303,0.000033296223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012345224,0.00006879904,0.00021136508,0.00006928482,0.0003924516,0.000031463635,0.00037120937,0.00003125656,0.000008025794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028566894,0.00004154321,0.000047233287,0.00046173294,0.00033059274,0.00018087137,0.000024280536,0.00015979788,0.0000012756747],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003517385,0.00032698692,0.022175448,0.00001776588,0.00008590649,0.000017471146,0.24166131,0.00009156138,0.00005618655,0.7191764,0.0071125505,0.009243221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004124361,0.00004932828,0.09014686,0.000096581774,0.000028934515,0.0000047054964,0.07501268,0.000003815287,0.00010859649,0.0013182117,0.83271706,0.00010077855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13323705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9535961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8256045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002311069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008515697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8725348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1848878169","doi":"","title":"Canada’s Fresh Water and NAFTA: Clearing the Muddied Waters","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Tribunal; Context (archaeology); Sovereignty; Law; International trade law; Government (linguistics); Position (finance); International trade; International law; Clearing; Water trading; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Water resources; History; Politics; Ecology; Finance","score_opus":0.016861709815122656,"score_gpt":0.2602034572963276,"score_spread":0.24334174748120493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1848878169","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89288217,0.0029436182,0.0000016863567,0.09530361,0.00052098784,0.00006843641,0.000021575095,0.0000057459442,0.008252179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991977,0.00043427615,0.000016346648,0.0018675007,0.0007357673,8.3728696e-7,1.974681e-7,0.000006289496,0.0049617994],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989538,0.00007066897,0.00023492443,0.00007265787,0.0003611805,0.00030675242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999525,0.00010088213,0.00012374684,0.00005950717,0.000115784016,0.00007505418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005070876,0.00008245116,0.00018104906,0.000028096658,0.0007796295,0.00008685835,0.00017169454,0.000025285552,0.00000946454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000116041636,0.000045383265,0.000046039924,0.000059056623,0.0003199804,0.00018231201,0.00005112748,0.00016597324,0.0000010753372],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004869285,0.000016896483,0.0055998373,0.000018247927,0.00021399192,0.00029787747,0.02264561,0.00011049535,0.00021913908,0.019476522,0.95011437,0.0012383111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018093282,0.000020270652,0.01648361,0.00002189183,0.000025355901,0.000021100399,0.0037872107,8.2355757e-7,0.00021964964,0.0007478796,0.9784105,0.000080790756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97149676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99394155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09909483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020179017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039268046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59963584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1853419240","doi":"","title":"A New Conception of Wilful Blindness: The Supreme Court of Canada's Decision in R. v. Sansregret","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mens rea; Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Blindness; Focus (optics); Sociology; Political science; Criminal law; Criminology; Medicine","score_opus":0.04023229177587528,"score_gpt":0.33328394300831143,"score_spread":0.29305165123243615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1853419240","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9811443,0.006448244,0.00004125264,0.008995808,0.00035953982,0.00010325863,0.0000055058185,0.0000027227493,0.0028993355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99603504,0.0028428552,0.00021295666,0.000087981076,0.00022549265,6.2697507e-7,1.2212051e-7,0.000004388658,0.00059051666],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980943,0.00014844924,0.0006101672,0.00008289443,0.0008643583,0.00019980183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985607,0.00052178296,0.00036785108,0.000097981734,0.0003765255,0.000075108044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012962308,0.00009150235,0.0003807257,0.000053831347,0.00019150876,0.000018955296,0.0003457168,0.00004088567,0.0001837866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005713449,0.000059241214,0.00009047275,0.00030185177,0.00032891394,0.00026845164,0.000029847,0.00017452714,8.7745445e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032446254,0.00047071045,0.06444832,0.00018566713,0.00060422375,0.00034017506,0.2234458,0.004082621,0.001077328,0.012940346,0.37100202,0.31815815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022986624,0.0010007136,0.10230573,0.0022175785,0.00027734382,0.000061779756,0.12080286,0.000033856944,0.0009957976,0.0065195737,0.76307195,0.00041414663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36024675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8320954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47184864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015476784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001155758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6440134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1910688488","doi":"","title":"A Dangerous Step Backwards: The Implications of Conditional Permanent Resident Status for Sponsored Immigrant Women in Abusive Relationships","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Context (archaeology); Domestic violence; Government (linguistics); Residence; Immigration law; Law; Political science; Criminology; Jurisprudence; Institution; Sociology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Geography","score_opus":0.07167891146118106,"score_gpt":0.35851966959434095,"score_spread":0.2868407581331599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1910688488","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97765535,0.009619712,0.000083818544,0.010660983,0.00039079736,0.0007081137,0.00015367291,0.000012386416,0.00071515044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99604875,0.0022491815,0.00064477633,0.00011369673,0.00042512376,0.00014118152,0.000005887873,0.0000116597375,0.00035973324],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972855,0.0005364999,0.00078703626,0.00012382535,0.0006087301,0.00065842253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99596745,0.0019925337,0.00073987164,0.000120316,0.0010084191,0.00017141187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003145533,0.00016545737,0.0004911332,0.000110229106,0.0011773012,0.00004174442,0.0002797299,0.000070133465,0.000021242524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030964818,0.000105573505,0.00019771756,0.00033217648,0.0007087349,0.0005194762,0.000088993664,0.0003276526,0.0000048246543],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034753836,0.0003405401,0.12768012,0.00007144128,0.00096283347,0.000006229834,0.81610346,0.00019227799,0.00028832964,0.040749885,0.012527986,0.0007293285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073774793,0.00011008775,0.5927197,0.00006115391,0.00009468619,0.000009319747,0.33221546,0.0000016218837,0.000024850899,0.0017382681,0.07215015,0.00013697079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014985652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041685095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48388803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010351493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021142692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9054968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1916515311","doi":"","title":"Balancing Privacy and the Open Court Principle of Family Law: Does De-Identifying Case Law Protect Anonymity?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Anonymity; Transparency (behavior); Law; Context (archaeology); Privacy laws of the United States; Privacy law; Internet privacy; Common law; Political science; Expectation of privacy; Right to know; Right to privacy; Sociology; Information privacy; Business; Supreme court; Privacy policy; Computer science","score_opus":0.04861317570297575,"score_gpt":0.3553008274656192,"score_spread":0.30668765176264345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1916515311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95493144,0.0048697386,0.0049221935,0.0046028416,0.0011336188,0.0011140043,0.000011320887,0.00003268887,0.02838218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971262,0.0007115013,0.0010090676,0.00029786432,0.00048534374,0.000009369539,1.1257702e-7,0.000011872754,0.00034863848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791384,0.00059290964,0.00054558896,0.00015063024,0.0004899986,0.0003070224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99810046,0.00060966576,0.00061153487,0.00017240204,0.00039962796,0.00010630988],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00560832,0.00014038038,0.0005740073,0.000040373336,0.0015758969,0.00034713937,0.00058849895,0.00005987985,0.000005899384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069958123,0.00007206482,0.000121689496,0.000127785,0.007574412,0.00078817125,0.0004117031,0.00026424805,8.4464216e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014356125,0.000052349904,0.0014908928,0.00007340998,0.00027417368,0.00024078939,0.031097129,0.0000109909615,0.00025047557,0.965452,0.00028897097,0.00062521244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01053061,0.00068499433,0.0017165288,0.001021006,0.00077441556,0.001402239,0.07152694,0.00015107752,0.0026450874,0.19912283,0.7096224,0.0008018723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006820756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010349378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7663292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008638498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013628646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1945093393","doi":"","title":"A Queer Critique on the Polygamy Debate in Canada: Law, Culture, and Diversity","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Marriage and Sexual Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Polygyny; Supreme court; Law; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Government (linguistics); Diversity (politics); Political science; Population; History","score_opus":0.06875747520976568,"score_gpt":0.32480819141815737,"score_spread":0.2560507162083917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1945093393","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95141566,0.005926445,0.0000032651647,0.008230541,0.000479739,0.000083480074,0.0000053827366,0.00000370904,0.033851765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99660903,0.0009605373,0.000012826588,0.0015341982,0.00018228691,9.641082e-7,1.0226062e-7,0.0000025536383,0.0006974961],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896336,0.00026153284,0.00016996542,0.000047951038,0.00035590178,0.00020128729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917775,0.00046955372,0.00010185316,0.00004176843,0.00012002064,0.00008905483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011167887,0.00006627418,0.00016574893,0.000035407516,0.000839228,0.000028541694,0.0001228234,0.000030262154,0.00001639061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007338927,0.000040017363,0.000027862241,0.00012682629,0.00014575303,0.00029176957,0.000090507,0.00026179085,9.613173e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055293953,0.000059067574,0.2575832,0.000009698509,0.0002251464,0.000093962444,0.15010181,0.0000107888,0.000012218017,0.56892484,0.022038108,0.00088583946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005663485,0.00013567104,0.282245,0.00013593571,0.00014370153,0.000022367296,0.21130018,0.000005463452,0.000051401883,0.0053412225,0.49976185,0.00029086226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7012489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9676597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5635836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002610517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002077197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6454748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099982348","doi":"","title":"Does The Charter Follow the Flag? Revisiting Constitutional Extraterritoriality after R v Hape","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Extraterritoriality; Law; Political science; Charter; Comity; International law; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Jurisdiction","score_opus":0.021777002743249622,"score_gpt":0.3187983158087409,"score_spread":0.2970213130654913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099982348","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8905677,0.000684463,0.00013390432,0.07538241,0.019828966,0.00020482672,0.000022106677,0.000018672163,0.01315692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873496,0.00013031704,0.000079964215,0.00049977173,0.010979282,0.0000069870707,5.299685e-7,0.0000033651008,0.00095013255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856794,0.00019218202,0.00034780896,0.00008225711,0.00064730924,0.0001625187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985097,0.0003799437,0.00030808803,0.00008263218,0.00068171014,0.000037939426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002162155,0.00008764206,0.0001520049,0.000023843868,0.0011289602,0.00022296696,0.00029166785,0.000045473043,0.00010019292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00073560694,0.000033882978,0.00014906861,0.00007368771,0.0009975596,0.00042354877,0.000045344965,0.00037369382,0.000010654773],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010602443,0.000046097233,0.016587075,0.00001026084,0.0003104084,0.0000410442,0.013023272,0.000004642118,0.0009198646,0.9620984,0.0044493875,0.0024035221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024841394,0.000029899786,0.015348466,0.00006220659,0.000061887375,0.000021923564,0.003400216,0.0000045134852,0.0001939879,0.00863139,0.9718929,0.000104218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002937526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029417316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96744347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004987123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017675439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8683163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112363706","doi":"","title":"Reciprocity: Fair Trade or Free Trade? Challenging American Electricity Regulation under NAFTA","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Restructuring; Commission; Order (exchange); Obligation; Economics; International trade; Government (linguistics); International trade law; Free trade; Business; Law; Law and economics; Finance; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04118949210264184,"score_gpt":0.3213496314512242,"score_spread":0.28016013934858236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112363706","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5608317,0.0053481553,0.0028146938,0.4155064,0.0012226474,0.00040518248,0.000057649286,0.0001143074,0.013699281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933326,0.0018989844,0.00024397657,0.0022624093,0.0012870868,0.0000023145512,2.4150447e-7,0.000015379253,0.0009570032],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981226,0.00024491647,0.0004191072,0.00015877206,0.0006351432,0.0004194948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985614,0.00040587992,0.0006203795,0.00014759647,0.00008319828,0.00018155025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010301489,0.00015052587,0.00044662427,0.0001282318,0.00068359816,0.000073428884,0.0003648618,0.000059523823,0.000014151721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001501573,0.00012171764,0.00014592931,0.00055497896,0.0004221182,0.0004205132,0.000034050063,0.00032250083,0.0000019636445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007732565,0.00035532456,0.0027998178,0.00012939882,0.001413811,0.00014213652,0.10004051,0.0010023124,0.0006582553,0.27156386,0.4272485,0.19387284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089731475,0.00057409675,0.076190345,0.0001267936,0.000107609485,0.000048039896,0.007873721,0.00008518331,0.00017692662,0.010475689,0.90307045,0.00037383867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008560798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07513362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47582194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039606792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002552491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112539498","doi":"","title":"Calculating Judgment Interest After Bank of America Canada v. Mutual Trust Co.: Difficulties Compounded","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Restitution; Law; Context (archaeology); Jurisdiction; Creditor; Unjust enrichment; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Debt","score_opus":0.04295107980467761,"score_gpt":0.3259100329100433,"score_spread":0.2829589531053657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112539498","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9891082,0.0012394211,0.00012901227,0.006015568,0.000301088,0.00012995547,0.00003556429,0.000011208702,0.00302995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99827033,0.00022527386,0.00068751344,0.00029989952,0.00027346218,0.0000067257233,0.0000011926587,0.000009142226,0.00022645447],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843,0.00006828952,0.00059417763,0.00011336201,0.0005396104,0.00025453977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878347,0.0001356588,0.0005048677,0.00010094916,0.00035888568,0.000116196024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000263942,0.00013405795,0.00039771592,0.000051259096,0.00042354097,0.000053423882,0.00025151292,0.00003305901,0.00002506565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017929907,0.00010329623,0.00012487371,0.00018899293,0.00047760742,0.00018594485,0.00008634229,0.00021754793,0.0000023902337],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017557355,0.003956617,0.11885704,0.0008107871,0.007806466,0.001664986,0.5025814,0.021557717,0.00996731,0.21419102,0.08788276,0.028968133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022156,0.00047446473,0.056133788,0.00047708373,0.0002513426,0.0000428077,0.15425971,0.000026472862,0.0018253769,0.0009183331,0.7827468,0.00062825705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25906372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.54615945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.694864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004933759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063458574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74587023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112600016","doi":"","title":"Child Support and Shared Parenting in Canada: A \"Reality Cheque\"","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Child support; Family law; Publishing; Law; Family court; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Jurisprudence; Economic Justice; Set (abstract data type); Section (typography); Cheque; Law reform; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.04553248621422363,"score_gpt":0.3132534242809266,"score_spread":0.267720938066703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112600016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95961976,0.005309822,0.0000011720355,0.025155762,0.00050685136,0.00029345317,0.000011564772,0.000015962065,0.009085626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973894,0.0015195337,0.00011847059,0.00038277588,0.00029251268,0.000012481484,6.542706e-7,0.000008701352,0.00027550344],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978414,0.00018855237,0.00065945525,0.00017168447,0.0006630878,0.00047580848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985985,0.00019040312,0.00044364808,0.00006999991,0.0005214499,0.00017598578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087474997,0.00018216108,0.0005765404,0.00005521513,0.0007483228,0.00012409742,0.0002316519,0.00005011605,0.000076228294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011154722,0.00013345518,0.00008261297,0.00023435331,0.00030441777,0.0007178012,0.00017210904,0.00036549175,0.000004234071],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048231595,0.00016841061,0.7423228,0.00016583453,0.0011278307,0.000380035,0.15600875,0.000052576226,0.000093385024,0.0031422393,0.081010334,0.015479577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064759096,0.00006156654,0.83389026,0.000161461,0.000053549877,0.000022914512,0.10884446,0.0000066040516,0.000020344487,0.00026860734,0.055747177,0.0002754813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9389769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9744873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09156745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009499645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005310024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.575557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116816638","doi":"","title":"Grassroots Capitalism or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying About Financial Risk in the Exempt Market and Love Equity Crowdfunding","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Equity crowdfunding; Seed money; Grassroots; Prospectus; Business; Equity (law); Finance; Economics; Market economy; Law","score_opus":0.042212727407663464,"score_gpt":0.29591915289719645,"score_spread":0.253706425489533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116816638","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9808115,0.0017610562,0.0007691876,0.005227819,0.0009137084,0.00028130313,0.000006237562,0.000030626135,0.010198571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959272,0.00032692467,0.00022417831,0.0013099909,0.0012254762,0.000006605969,6.8392916e-7,0.000034942284,0.0009440113],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978054,0.00006956395,0.000607925,0.0003246909,0.0006103703,0.0005820438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981424,0.00041103127,0.00088486186,0.00021813413,0.0003114431,0.000032079282],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00299032,0.00034567632,0.0006568831,0.00046936647,0.0003874805,0.0011750666,0.0005832263,0.00008548202,0.000015741642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005637112,0.00023110352,0.00014437368,0.0007699646,0.00018187199,0.0021001664,0.00076036906,0.00062861975,0.000026607595],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031601407,0.00067341764,0.4237546,0.0018059254,0.0005847266,0.0016301402,0.01692689,0.00055303716,0.000927164,0.06219148,0.30829948,0.17949301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028858662,0.00044893657,0.5556721,0.0016560077,0.0002809322,0.00017421653,0.008749375,0.00044169262,0.000079264784,0.017151315,0.4113333,0.0011269844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024297294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014631402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17836602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012016932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000405507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130130495","doi":"","title":"All Convictions Are Not the Same: Rethinking CUPE’s Abuse of Process Doctrine in Cases Involving Plea Bargains","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Plea; Rebuttal; Law; Doctrine; Political science; Supreme court; Warrant; Innocence; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.10482562282533785,"score_gpt":0.3827937724761825,"score_spread":0.27796814965084465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130130495","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9816528,0.0032191407,0.000017618999,0.013008719,0.0004903594,0.00012391481,0.0000036451104,0.000015534075,0.001468301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99541926,0.0032947925,0.00009695066,0.00066403154,0.00040286107,0.000004025826,2.0588105e-7,0.000008656556,0.00010923366],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980351,0.00030206118,0.00060439756,0.00013157474,0.0006452534,0.00028166597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99712676,0.001378027,0.0006517081,0.00012671395,0.00064428075,0.00007248722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022693595,0.00013042561,0.0004286488,0.00011684547,0.00060327613,0.00007764151,0.00041182354,0.000054206004,0.000008460421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003628365,0.00008704844,0.00011822697,0.00033354442,0.000518956,0.0005503396,0.00006370142,0.00034005396,0.00000189042],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004446008,0.0005161703,0.12095697,0.00047533851,0.00055647333,0.00036274068,0.78822446,0.0018001323,0.0007305008,0.076845415,0.007299018,0.001788157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020939498,0.00088345294,0.07208332,0.004077545,0.00070377276,0.00031605025,0.584707,0.00018781876,0.0020309957,0.018979466,0.31307042,0.00086618646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036259985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038940255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3057714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011811341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001392663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97859657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133624854","doi":"","title":"Clarifying the Role of Precedent and the Doctrine of Stare Decisis in Trial and Intermediate Appellate Level Charter Analysis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Doctrine; Supreme court; Appeal; Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Context (archaeology); Sociology; History","score_opus":0.03883818339344456,"score_gpt":0.33207330233573684,"score_spread":0.29323511894229226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133624854","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.989644,0.005180134,0.000035764995,0.0040739872,0.00005644101,0.00031552595,0.000008923615,0.0000017135278,0.0006834946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955226,0.0041957884,0.0000615141,0.00003530814,0.000101633144,0.000011036458,1.8227631e-7,0.0000030455744,0.000068895795],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873364,0.00017955438,0.0005645111,0.000084050174,0.0003086579,0.00012960704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985872,0.0005173327,0.00050965423,0.00010008965,0.0002461466,0.000039591978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013972201,0.000077508754,0.0004177659,0.00010479883,0.0002048836,0.00006391921,0.0002172522,0.00003371626,0.00001385011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026372794,0.00003813536,0.00012545573,0.0003476285,0.0005783536,0.00018412062,0.00014191304,0.00018910634,4.7011812e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00905258,0.0006718514,0.2218487,0.0001447042,0.010268559,0.000009757632,0.5227669,0.00063720613,0.0014118919,0.07601693,0.001181473,0.15598944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.040265985,0.00079732965,0.5486514,0.00032632478,0.0031873004,0.000012212032,0.3230047,0.0010383409,0.001116074,0.029278236,0.051773712,0.00054837164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033748916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052584414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32680273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023593382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039164228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5101849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139869860","doi":"","title":"Jagged Little Pill: The New Frontier for Shareholder Rights Plans and the Fiduciary Duties of Target Boards","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Shareholder; Frontier; Law; Pill; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Corporate governance; Finance; Duty; Biology","score_opus":0.019466209638679087,"score_gpt":0.22651733998860896,"score_spread":0.20705113034992986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139869860","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8724911,0.04233111,0.0005912917,0.068368524,0.0028534175,0.0013478657,0.00006419576,0.000040454328,0.011912044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925225,0.00048035826,0.00024735616,0.0017642166,0.0021814276,0.000016910708,0.0000029327978,0.000018562974,0.002765774],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897265,0.000016876313,0.00043347746,0.00010357084,0.00028934947,0.00018407039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838847,0.00018541813,0.0007435571,0.00013741726,0.0005331305,0.000012003447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000449255,0.00015647382,0.00041715696,0.000056042372,0.00035310522,0.00021608901,0.0002783904,0.000031965876,0.000085030515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020427081,0.00006997354,0.00014408711,0.0001462247,0.00025746506,0.0010515791,0.00015762559,0.00015641854,0.0000070868755],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035030974,0.000050184404,0.003637863,0.00012811513,0.0006138673,0.000006847321,0.0015023659,0.000042087457,0.000055798617,0.025899611,0.9657303,0.0019826177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002624816,0.000057866702,0.024763865,0.0001587385,0.00027530987,0.000011160404,0.002796984,0.00015903608,0.00011652697,0.054642487,0.9142112,0.0001820189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016284164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00057904026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.120031364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000125535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036478425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28534383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146344421","doi":"","title":"A Mean and Green Fighting Machine: Wartime Environmental Assessments and the Canadian Forces","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"International Environmental Law and Policies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Directive; Environmental impact assessment; Plan (archaeology); Law; Political science; Environmental law; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Public administration; Environmental science; Computer science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.010268246867230588,"score_gpt":0.2638077895058359,"score_spread":0.2535395426386053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146344421","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9798005,0.0027233392,0.000020774489,0.0017464384,0.00011724696,0.00010604061,0.000015040654,0.0000037307404,0.015466894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99722224,0.00037868475,0.00024440233,0.00077563996,0.000081088096,0.0000013113208,8.031902e-7,0.000009462378,0.0012863745],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988118,0.00004594214,0.0003122307,0.00011242321,0.00048000307,0.00023759951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999466,0.00012715584,0.00019514425,0.000063442574,0.0000064126925,0.00014184658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010233321,0.00013726528,0.00019903707,0.000045092744,0.0005053926,0.00005103704,0.00014871397,0.000031655833,0.000106715655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028339942,0.0000834188,0.00005356094,0.000038372917,0.000789158,0.00028770004,0.00020564502,0.00018430092,0.000016742115],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016356265,0.00037842998,0.7904063,0.000090972964,0.0028395504,0.001107239,0.04927644,0.0008564855,0.008013923,0.039138414,0.006282491,0.09997415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0043858965,0.0006327112,0.59782416,0.00010041421,0.000291611,0.0016089032,0.005197899,0.00080612267,0.0012908651,0.0040761405,0.38314745,0.00063786114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044088755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16456836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37686494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029936177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009633432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96227676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152849106","doi":"","title":"The Story of Jane Doe: A book about rape","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Media Studies and Communication","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03192146707410422,"score_gpt":0.3366811567286839,"score_spread":0.30475968965457967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152849106","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16914456,0.63997275,0.000023831897,0.13986248,0.0016275764,0.00027387036,0.0000039598026,0.000024372095,0.049066637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8287814,0.16538674,0.00024684635,0.0004832068,0.0008373206,0.000005721838,1.2061464e-7,0.0000072923854,0.004251312],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839264,0.00038161158,0.0004237795,0.00005952253,0.0005387695,0.00020369004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977643,0.0008924584,0.00056309905,0.00017076421,0.00055161846,0.00005775541],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024609945,0.00008459028,0.00028513357,0.00004177058,0.0014714212,0.00003113241,0.0004762862,0.000033180957,0.0000185695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009613716,0.000051198913,0.00013437751,0.00014186946,0.0006909791,0.0002446399,0.00012119507,0.0003176218,0.000006259741],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002934736,0.00031001362,0.0024751325,0.00005038988,0.0017099307,0.000018233452,0.24268866,0.00006892382,0.00035866856,0.06988052,0.3425342,0.33961186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000236856,0.00009044886,0.0022841424,0.000047691097,0.00004758082,0.0000030971164,0.035513707,0.0000018177875,0.000051974806,0.00017006643,0.9614962,0.00005644082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001037961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024215593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65963686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000106913016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015326879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163197924","doi":"","title":"From en ventre sa mere to Thawing an Heir: Posthumously Conceived Children and the Implications for Succession Law in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Ecological succession; Legislation; Law; Estate; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Warrant; Probate; Political science; Sociology; Common law; Business","score_opus":0.022319177134371253,"score_gpt":0.3173481726711056,"score_spread":0.29502899553673434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163197924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94011366,0.0034394409,0.0000027966046,0.055216502,0.00016532523,0.00066733867,0.000058033525,0.0000088283305,0.000328071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99766034,0.00072754064,0.00025361116,0.0008425125,0.00040772607,0.00004208931,0.00000324446,0.000009050865,0.00005389238],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858207,0.00027840096,0.00040001626,0.00016297154,0.00028353487,0.000293015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984016,0.0008308878,0.0002156823,0.00009016675,0.00032466583,0.00013700707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047006947,0.00014575984,0.00042372048,0.00002332015,0.0011202506,0.00013361254,0.00034354275,0.000039125138,0.000018501309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000385878,0.00008386536,0.00007316657,0.0001212975,0.0003411725,0.00049149775,0.00009689581,0.00018395759,0.0000014793026],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000547485,0.00015210286,0.32743102,0.000025176978,0.0015731822,0.000014151134,0.59860283,0.00028353566,0.00078810385,0.021867795,0.022458978,0.026255663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017532571,0.000092128714,0.85500526,0.00011856586,0.000103657825,0.000005034029,0.12761372,0.000009083598,0.000042248805,0.0032183179,0.011797018,0.00024171351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95777446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96473235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52757424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039266268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020336059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86161745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2173424207","doi":"","title":"International Commercial Arbitration in China: Locating the Development of CIETAC in the Context of International and Domestic Factors","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"China; Arbitration; Context (archaeology); Order (exchange); Commission; Principal (computer security); Work (physics); International trade; Domestic market; Economics; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.027912127571993007,"score_gpt":0.2750681242874617,"score_spread":0.24715599671546867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2173424207","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9843976,0.00016289168,0.00005384103,0.0051598023,0.00049857894,0.0001559919,0.0000012112765,0.000002430613,0.0095676845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99790287,0.000050906096,0.00019096977,0.0016210028,0.0002005338,0.000007757069,0.000005206449,0.000004875298,0.000015889513],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861157,0.000026406715,0.000763899,0.000072819996,0.0004397322,0.00008555809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986958,0.00015094456,0.0006720937,0.000048680184,0.00042750244,0.0000050081353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072165416,0.000102723745,0.00019890338,0.0002249246,0.00007845964,0.00009837548,0.00032616194,0.0000220136,0.00003537077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003240839,0.000057799436,0.000050319682,0.00016666453,0.00012983478,0.0009183524,0.00009433523,0.00017592892,0.0000018118786],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002465256,0.0010103883,0.6399151,0.00022359694,0.0009239619,0.000017563694,0.05318361,0.0005036937,0.003999614,0.2860342,0.0030732225,0.01086849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010335176,0.00003198458,0.9645654,0.00019793703,0.000024597886,0.000009204432,0.018239979,0.0012761983,0.00028335195,0.0018115981,0.012414164,0.00011209286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003977334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008022394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32465023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045689314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035330162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23569927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2173772894","doi":"","title":"Bringing Meaning to First Nations Consultation in the British Columbia Salmon Aquaculture Industry","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Law; Context (archaeology); Indigenous; Jurisprudence; Government (linguistics); Seriousness; Aquaculture; Supreme court; Sociology; Political science; History; Fishery; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Archaeology; Ecology","score_opus":0.033863107061648266,"score_gpt":0.3246822346768829,"score_spread":0.29081912761523465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2173772894","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94666183,0.0032191244,0.0000095020605,0.0286468,0.00036822676,0.00040328942,0.000009025761,0.00003364557,0.020648526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99499595,0.0009313635,0.0007789068,0.0006305893,0.0007603498,0.000018042012,7.508581e-7,0.0000096656695,0.0018743708],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791086,0.00022850932,0.0005499338,0.00015631279,0.00079594675,0.000358441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979981,0.0008093407,0.0003304507,0.00006317436,0.00070609985,0.00009280363],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014171344,0.00012131336,0.00033745044,0.00006231509,0.0042295316,0.0011505418,0.0003663161,0.00012840226,0.000028208095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005350038,0.000113590395,0.000108631466,0.0008296115,0.00025022263,0.0006931122,0.00008411982,0.00067968486,0.000009135012],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030984593,0.000281846,0.074101284,0.000060122125,0.00049940386,0.00021503586,0.78880805,0.002494089,0.000090152746,0.0029122084,0.11665967,0.013847181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008028942,0.0001074162,0.10153335,0.0006139741,0.000088508255,0.00006536641,0.3220128,0.000012618277,0.000010563232,0.00019583463,0.5742596,0.00029704836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048224367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87114567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8229213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049043796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008135246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2174983601","doi":"","title":"Case Comment: Canada (A-G) v. S.D. Meyers, Inc., [2004] 3 F.C.J. No. 29.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Tribunal; Jurisdiction; Damages; Political science; Law; Government (linguistics); Subject (documents); Investment (military); Law and economics; Business; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.022475313116704396,"score_gpt":0.246952587945943,"score_spread":0.2244772748292386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2174983601","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42997348,0.0054589626,0.00010574115,0.12030522,0.007569357,0.0004694341,0.000038494563,0.00010755253,0.43597177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90454465,0.00007998767,0.00031861896,0.09012942,0.0036631692,0.0000031604895,0.0000070220403,0.000018728275,0.0012352215],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855965,0.000013783148,0.00058219914,0.00011320477,0.0005171374,0.00021404047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824005,0.000053058386,0.00054510403,0.00009276012,0.0010429082,0.000026105181],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033641575,0.00017967443,0.00028696595,0.00014761387,0.00031323437,0.0001707151,0.00020521543,0.000027337675,0.00022496926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001826901,0.00014061188,0.00009050043,0.00014716454,0.00006848806,0.001486935,0.00011171139,0.00017784895,0.00011183602],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007747299,0.00014023684,0.0008082183,0.0000584141,0.00044077577,0.0020100144,0.000121109864,0.00032768212,0.00007776166,0.087555856,0.9076704,0.00071208563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068929506,0.000025849751,0.00012338218,0.00004043494,0.000070001275,0.0004608889,0.00045212172,0.000500067,0.0000814382,0.00025161004,0.9971412,0.00016370078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06366158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22197382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4745712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023028255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012336779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9425736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2217130762","doi":"","title":"Frontline Providers of Mental Healthcare: The Role of Police Officers in Involuntary Psychiatric Assessments Under the Mental Health Care And Treatment Act","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Mental health; Context (archaeology); Mental healthcare; Mental Health Act; Apprehension; Officer; Health care; Legislation; Nursing; Psychology; Statutory law; Psychiatry; Medicine; Public relations; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.021750546296385034,"score_gpt":0.3538858773562764,"score_spread":0.3321353310598914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2217130762","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9478988,0.03645612,4.7475473e-7,0.013739806,0.0008463577,0.00046153812,0.000068299276,0.000004402324,0.0005241818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99629104,0.002706255,0.0001256789,0.0006381967,0.00018496049,0.0000076504575,0.0000050313593,0.000016951119,0.000024241366],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983679,0.00020925389,0.0006997585,0.00016180098,0.00030633123,0.00025492368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877924,0.00013746328,0.0007005985,0.00021387605,0.00009645247,0.00007237531],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036860871,0.00019350187,0.00049549865,0.00014219659,0.00021860312,0.000014406971,0.00021219862,0.000052026146,0.0000144919295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005209701,0.00010328304,0.00014084538,0.00018808078,0.00023828766,0.00012413056,0.00006461505,0.00040564954,7.665768e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002632476,0.0023116318,0.4683832,0.00016200231,0.0044827596,0.000013928755,0.3999538,0.000030854866,0.0005539717,0.0030358697,0.008425581,0.11001392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006374972,0.0046785865,0.5747306,0.000118448705,0.00020995001,0.00018565568,0.39226642,0.000005808369,0.00019255106,0.00016179107,0.020877078,0.00019814246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01921723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06149318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10981577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018966664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002664066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98731387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2276470016","doi":"","title":"An Uneasy Relationship: Combating a Global Threat Through International Trade","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; European union; Sovereignty; Politics; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Jurisprudence; International trade; Law; Political economy; Economics","score_opus":0.047356612437845697,"score_gpt":0.3888039403700382,"score_spread":0.34144732793219246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2276470016","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33846793,0.0078218365,0.0039098,0.50228757,0.0052637807,0.00049508444,0.000037626665,0.0003483089,0.14136809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99390805,0.0003042451,0.0040472583,0.00081055996,0.00079582015,5.193744e-7,0.0000022875688,0.0000078218645,0.00012342252],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983112,0.00020553994,0.00049524475,0.00013058723,0.0006416191,0.00021580161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902326,0.00015776468,0.00040821926,0.000096451535,0.00021244948,0.00010184795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060599827,0.00012502888,0.00025603102,0.000051616287,0.0007109438,0.00017064458,0.00040873096,0.000059095993,0.00003774702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00076728873,0.00010971938,0.000095137264,0.00053015735,0.00024165456,0.0014293238,0.000022499906,0.00022153606,0.0000050825593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034831268,0.00023053441,0.058658127,0.0000035766072,0.00014540611,0.00006464295,0.02316236,0.00029747307,0.00006129706,0.9101322,0.0036644584,0.0035450913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021024076,0.00066358794,0.49025232,0.00021043356,0.00023657728,0.00023521764,0.033739027,0.000058446887,0.00013349403,0.07417412,0.39759964,0.00059473515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008845803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004155391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83595806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003072161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015722383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5468077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2281601326","doi":"","title":"Getting Our Act Together: A Review of the Canadian Derivatives Regulatory Landscape and an Argument for a Dedicated Derivatives Regime","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Global Financial Regulation and Crises","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Ambiguity; Argument (complex analysis); Scope (computer science); Derivatives market; Law and economics; Enforcement; Business; Guardian; Political science; Industrial organization; Public economics; Economics; Law; Computer science; Finance; Futures contract","score_opus":0.0710882603641722,"score_gpt":0.3331007918230887,"score_spread":0.2620125314589165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2281601326","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006774091,0.99582034,0.000015212382,0.001601115,0.0004505739,0.0006055995,0.00019548822,0.0000057100233,0.0006285559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0036074792,0.9951081,0.00047947615,0.0003258299,0.000249944,0.000027685868,0.000008386371,0.00003492741,0.00015816749],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976803,0.0001058497,0.0015490332,0.00026760562,0.00011883877,0.00027836207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99588734,0.00012707568,0.0031826084,0.00028878154,0.00035627236,0.00015794204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016578493,0.00032971948,0.0021823351,0.00025433674,0.00032505344,0.00005828132,0.0004308021,0.00019235979,0.0000101564065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018083568,0.0002267371,0.0005262987,0.00031738952,0.0001533252,0.00023091139,0.00009319187,0.00041098322,0.0000017816346],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051800285,0.00023653891,0.004919686,0.07817046,0.00338752,0.000024100582,0.0031093177,0.0000035543333,0.000005099309,0.080738634,0.021238124,0.8081152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021300689,0.00010891444,0.0015015033,0.01874274,0.0002375877,0.00004251448,0.00021353802,0.0000018504444,0.000002477192,0.0011285064,0.9775667,0.00024065067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043197384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036391248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9563286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015745107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005015912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9246071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283415456","doi":"","title":"Advertising and the Charter: Just Do It? An Analysis of the Constitutional Recognition of Commercial Expression","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Jurisprudence; Expression (computer science); Constitutional law; Political science; Politics; Marketplace of ideas; Sociology; First amendment; Computer science","score_opus":0.0467082171192189,"score_gpt":0.32601063120417223,"score_spread":0.2793024140849533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283415456","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98952186,0.0023731913,0.00031234132,0.0028384249,0.0003720462,0.00012030885,0.000034944325,0.000004468277,0.00442244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968497,0.002589631,0.000060872906,0.00013976742,0.0002607782,0.0000010448767,9.789079e-7,0.000002266112,0.00009491916],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846596,0.00039044904,0.0004484866,0.00007921453,0.00049970095,0.00011622028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988555,0.00025464105,0.00041480194,0.00009141761,0.00034065222,0.00004304007],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011529927,0.00007696602,0.00039061246,0.000075270065,0.00079005904,0.000036346177,0.00020252979,0.000043498298,0.000119656914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014855756,0.000037705027,0.00020298103,0.00030803846,0.014710327,0.00036543782,0.000032854696,0.00012916887,4.8371356e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027267025,0.00096448045,0.054633606,0.00010224488,0.006636917,0.00003079219,0.4370299,0.0009322089,0.0018218479,0.36470082,0.0061312746,0.1242892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02703203,0.0018313376,0.22487782,0.0041928794,0.027238939,0.00020255863,0.39779556,0.0008003699,0.0080148075,0.064013265,0.24201143,0.0019889954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021362728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007745712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30068755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003140863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008600326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98797107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2313398693","doi":"","title":"The Concept of Payment: Wire Transfer Orders, the Common Law and Article 4A","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Payment; Obligation; Business; Debt; Liability; Beneficiary; Law; Order (exchange); Point (geometry); Law and economics; Uniform Commercial Code; Conflict of laws; Economics; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.037008939791999665,"score_gpt":0.252018743073701,"score_spread":0.21500980328170133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2313398693","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8865582,0.023866707,0.0002073225,0.05315498,0.0013935484,0.00026488918,0.000011471696,0.000027247366,0.034515675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966435,0.00081382244,0.0000127815365,0.0019147131,0.00043946944,0.0000013580491,2.9116927e-7,0.00000778246,0.00016629329],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914193,0.000017450067,0.00036400204,0.00006337919,0.00028198826,0.00013127361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993021,0.00019093146,0.00017648861,0.000079236845,0.00024292935,0.000008301453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003039439,0.00009324216,0.00019807927,0.00002366648,0.00037780977,0.00014192509,0.00020783098,0.000018454819,0.00002802729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008144762,0.000046668556,0.000075967626,0.00008081925,0.00071495486,0.00042373064,0.00005914,0.00013604286,0.0000041951453],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007724251,0.00013936945,0.0039329417,0.0000506459,0.00054275733,0.000025685684,0.001716072,0.00012991071,0.0001636465,0.96620715,0.023472086,0.0035425045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023627647,0.00020289389,0.00792884,0.00018996352,0.0004270489,0.00005090483,0.008816484,0.0015540672,0.0010323102,0.024523588,0.95261407,0.0002970487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015697704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032236543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94168353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001153752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000033456442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29058456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339319031","doi":"","title":"You Can't Take the Sky from Me: A Gramscian Interpretation of the Common Heritage of Mankind Principle in Space Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Space exploration and regulation","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Law; Hegemony; Interpretation (philosophy); International law; Space (punctuation); Space law; Sociology; Political science; Outer space; Philosophy; Politics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.027720453133091717,"score_gpt":0.29162765206194474,"score_spread":0.263907198928853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339319031","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934303,0.0005358079,0.0002637597,0.003552683,0.0004111073,0.00013568503,0.000019893272,0.0000023377702,0.0016484272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99955344,0.000008155627,0.00012697863,0.000040427312,0.00012306127,0.000002613153,0.0000027757314,0.0000070242954,0.00013554508],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990645,0.000123847,0.0003925987,0.00006171187,0.0002762321,0.000081085214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989425,0.000058513673,0.00060884695,0.00013278,0.00023125905,0.000026095542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003008897,0.0000884081,0.00026204923,0.00003419996,0.00006674736,0.00002171139,0.00017063793,0.000020516645,0.0000056874355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025772159,0.000047811245,0.00009972454,0.00015174465,0.00015501355,0.00016798406,0.000074446434,0.00015826013,5.505841e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006937355,0.00074728084,0.5376004,0.000061485815,0.0015932069,0.000010296082,0.2057394,0.017656846,0.0062989257,0.21741934,0.0034807078,0.0086983675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008887527,0.0010355586,0.46489444,0.0015793301,0.0006389643,0.0000140729835,0.34488568,0.005677367,0.045200545,0.07618426,0.050245907,0.0007563432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011608576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033852216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14123508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038699836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005912079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1949686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340946344","doi":"","title":"Following Digital Media into the Courtroom: Publicity and the Open Court Principle in the Information Age","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Publicity; Publication; Economic Justice; Democracy; Narrative; Social media; Freedom of the press; Normative; Supreme court; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.05299997535309214,"score_gpt":0.3500924784065506,"score_spread":0.29709250305345847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2340946344","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76728433,0.006398917,0.000027806414,0.15977387,0.0011474402,0.0007030364,0.0000068307154,0.000015264415,0.06464248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99697036,0.00087995426,0.000054336044,0.001607521,0.00030193475,0.0000090380845,0.0000011216084,0.0000027716653,0.00017297736],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832433,0.00030600058,0.00033784076,0.000052603085,0.000808108,0.00017109375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987001,0.00058122526,0.00028335367,0.00009730858,0.00028288274,0.000055119435],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006833916,0.000087063985,0.00023647836,0.0000087665385,0.0010053786,0.0013810862,0.00088092557,0.000048729384,0.0000017078095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026865187,0.000033348504,0.00010411014,0.00026222758,0.0007239469,0.0027438744,0.00029952126,0.00036128465,0.000002054087],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006173988,0.000026558948,0.0027184582,0.0000034223335,0.00014756384,0.000014612418,0.9054331,0.00001658903,3.0875e-7,0.058324315,0.03170754,0.0015457809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009797752,0.00002771189,0.0021027606,0.000021091837,0.00003508321,0.000008680059,0.37410676,0.0000050243834,6.34673e-7,0.010878812,0.61178,0.00005368178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007401738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004148781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58007246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009509201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017992075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343595580","doi":"","title":"Caveat Cloudster: Why Traditional Common and Civil Property Law Should Apply to Virtual Property and How It Will Change the Legal Realities of the Internet","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Tangible property; Property (philosophy); Property law; Intangible property; Intellectual property; Digital Millennium Copyright Act; Law and economics; Business; Property rights; Real property; Internet privacy; Law; Computer science; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.1856089506789757,"score_gpt":0.3280840012781128,"score_spread":0.14247505059913712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343595580","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47122428,0.0034954427,0.000047502886,0.4979456,0.0007105541,0.0012039716,0.00015844012,0.000026668637,0.025187539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99233055,0.00037488426,0.000044162898,0.0033917802,0.00068367424,0.000039433417,8.236775e-7,0.000011093792,0.003123616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841076,0.00026021566,0.0003047626,0.00014676596,0.0006632542,0.00021422446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988993,0.00016468589,0.00026041045,0.00014292444,0.00038030662,0.0001523775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011629605,0.00015213614,0.000334778,0.000032041142,0.00056956004,0.00022528913,0.0004059642,0.000053318407,0.00000434397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017846205,0.000059783702,0.0000820466,0.0001571306,0.0011958011,0.0006229962,0.00029576596,0.00029266768,6.4806477e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028384765,0.0002446844,0.0044338717,0.00007786901,0.0004584733,0.0000177077,0.2235476,0.000021834312,0.00016676472,0.54273313,0.22162642,0.00638782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033006037,0.0003906982,0.0014033216,0.00011392689,0.00006637307,0.000047036763,0.031715475,0.000015810478,0.0000677186,0.001199769,0.96453065,0.000119163444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008791686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04166272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74290425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009480684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012125945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978089},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343821668","doi":"","title":"Canadian Prison Needle-Exchange Programs: Can the Health Benefits Overcome the Current Legal Barriers?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Legislature; Government (linguistics); Harm; Agency (philosophy); Political science; Charter; Public health; Public administration; Law; Criminology; Medicine; Sociology; Nursing","score_opus":0.10642020846571186,"score_gpt":0.3714246316988311,"score_spread":0.26500442323311924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343821668","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62497246,0.15998934,0.0000096529775,0.2076832,0.0034500915,0.0014115673,0.00009715369,0.00005975673,0.002326753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99022573,0.0037991556,0.000079814236,0.0032975953,0.0017236706,0.000028685077,0.000008144763,0.000057593013,0.0007796057],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99652654,0.00028721802,0.0008692331,0.00024115486,0.0012143373,0.000861512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963935,0.0001440918,0.0006389488,0.00045166057,0.0009662113,0.0014056154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023054488,0.00036511925,0.0008586901,0.00024121617,0.000689159,0.00014450803,0.0005232125,0.00006610766,0.000011737564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009965294,0.00018549844,0.00021759841,0.0005736605,0.00030639762,0.0002620906,0.00016707426,0.0013214742,0.000017644486],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005122744,0.00031364925,0.057160523,0.0003319455,0.0015399704,0.00043936542,0.1952657,0.000111193054,0.0000036331824,0.0014038893,0.25792158,0.4849963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017092883,0.00237645,0.011562155,0.00051918376,0.00029969128,0.0005580272,0.09985487,0.000037752437,0.000011785636,0.00008584952,0.88274014,0.00024481647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06193492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36373618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62481856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014896058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038150093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94431174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344828161","doi":"","title":"Edward Snowden: Hero or Traitor? Considering the Implications for Canadian National Security and Whistleblower Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Military and Defense Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"United States National Security Agency; Law; National security; Agency (philosophy); Statutory law; Government (linguistics); Political science; Jurisprudence; Sociology","score_opus":0.12416158155690674,"score_gpt":0.3764097731773454,"score_spread":0.25224819162043866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344828161","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32151887,0.06705219,0.00012029585,0.30805275,0.0051725865,0.001504522,0.0004781689,0.00008354041,0.29601705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967171,0.0006315401,0.00033144563,0.0011490359,0.0007970347,0.000015478516,5.4135813e-7,0.000006500733,0.00035133012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989863,0.00010010159,0.0002833491,0.000103267914,0.0002909903,0.00023601629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99787223,0.000599305,0.00013296357,0.000059551283,0.0011288899,0.00020702869],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014445955,0.000098434015,0.00023829493,0.000051636074,0.0015968493,0.00006763503,0.00014501641,0.0000396726,0.000007341487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016577233,0.00006165,0.000075636875,0.00012303599,0.00068140496,0.0002805817,0.00003986407,0.00013518672,0.0000013351263],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016156466,0.000053784293,0.0026637386,0.000031255735,0.0006894542,0.000022122886,0.16124788,0.000031911764,0.00000772196,0.54746026,0.28693455,0.000695764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038278569,0.00011469531,0.0010425242,0.000022206812,0.000056743862,0.000045452034,0.05973573,0.0000021525777,0.000004088181,0.04504859,0.8934409,0.000104119674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017929783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6897415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6751982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019541194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2414595098","doi":"","title":"Comfort Women in Japan and Korea","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Comfort women; Pleasure; Human rights; Law; World War II; Political science; Work (physics); International law; Sociology; Gender studies; History; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.05175822352926611,"score_gpt":0.2389391361095546,"score_spread":0.18718091258028852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2414595098","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91120553,0.0057001174,0.0000012939565,0.0015133757,0.00039175083,0.000040175055,0.0000090728245,0.000010597801,0.08112809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98423076,0.000507026,0.000013318621,0.00036072347,0.00030979668,0.000002420984,2.0428213e-7,0.000007575024,0.014568184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912095,0.000027873508,0.00037445335,0.00007286437,0.00016312503,0.00024074371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995605,0.000083525105,0.0001076396,0.000050818548,0.00008511157,0.00011245358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019601178,0.00010205286,0.0003481394,0.00009266862,0.00013693908,0.000051455838,0.00008573417,0.000019719548,0.0001586923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006829824,0.00007088782,0.000052437674,0.000030950137,0.00028025912,0.00026486977,0.00004159229,0.00019127913,0.0000088346715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007395362,0.000393129,0.010102174,0.000084501524,0.0003132499,0.00031676103,0.19123921,0.0000055466803,0.000009946919,0.7704355,0.016620396,0.010405637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062908366,0.0005336429,0.0017547654,0.00005758663,0.000021172948,0.000042675896,0.015001403,0.0000941561,9.909576e-7,0.0070780283,0.9746215,0.00016503989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000089104884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030734786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9580011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001110256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009297294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28907216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2414767070","doi":"","title":"Lesbian Mothers & Gay Fathers: Overt and Subconscious Homophobic Biases Concerning Parenting Fitness","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Subconscious; Impartiality; Presumption; Adversarial system; Lesbian; Homosexuality; Morality; Psychology; Law; Adjudication; Social psychology; Sociology; Criminology; Political science; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.07527631941376424,"score_gpt":0.35789675035867685,"score_spread":0.2826204309449126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2414767070","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97882235,0.016416468,0.0000138911755,0.0032756773,0.0007345974,0.00016313326,0.0000035118485,0.00006354176,0.0005068569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99603724,0.0022642163,0.0008242632,0.00023263074,0.00040934488,0.000004588743,5.528042e-7,0.000023300012,0.00020385765],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986745,0.000034428682,0.00047749004,0.00022197205,0.00028348799,0.00030813232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985852,0.00024721574,0.00043991982,0.00020359344,0.00040026772,0.00012375036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005657924,0.00018704268,0.0006023853,0.00018977409,0.00025818488,0.000043353233,0.0001114667,0.000086299086,0.000017508923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023779643,0.00013069337,0.000105925305,0.00017579172,0.0005570028,0.00021726658,0.00008788818,0.0006987375,0.0000026055236],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006889982,0.00029444922,0.84599024,0.00059278385,0.0012441138,0.0012165568,0.00845041,0.000020615738,0.05606846,0.0008213359,0.004349204,0.08026286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013294213,0.0062115137,0.5685998,0.004110285,0.0015523367,0.01516086,0.113066375,0.000109428765,0.05923761,0.0029154622,0.21414524,0.0015968621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008012417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009806335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2773904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043541175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013908374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5329521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2423530761","doi":"","title":"Towards a Canadian Policy for Patenting Disease Genes","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Commodification; Monopoly; Genetic testing; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Business; Sociology; Economics; Biology; Genetics","score_opus":0.19744960172335116,"score_gpt":0.27263002168022293,"score_spread":0.07518041995687177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2423530761","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.842515,0.037777435,0.0004473765,0.05426012,0.0049760467,0.0010163044,0.000061068466,0.00011908146,0.058827553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909287,0.0004503471,0.00011612056,0.0035597533,0.0034697754,0.0000074522154,0.000002276182,0.000025857184,0.0014397331],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886113,0.000009670088,0.0003906263,0.00012167546,0.00023623345,0.00038065022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988429,0.0000357543,0.00027611517,0.00008602195,0.000699362,0.000059848862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031567685,0.00016751172,0.00028803397,0.00044112187,0.00048470023,0.00022121255,0.00023564286,0.00003230073,0.0001099309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010075307,0.00011962939,0.00020112764,0.00029647019,0.00005901437,0.00078256114,0.00008046714,0.00012653106,0.000077315904],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012200834,0.0007708851,0.04716344,0.0027806207,0.003370115,0.0016552346,0.0056423703,0.0012587503,0.00056060764,0.037840154,0.5210704,0.37666732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096743787,0.00007486682,0.0033012517,0.00021987589,0.0002548048,0.000024414141,0.00088294497,0.0028679788,0.000050064158,0.00247964,0.988517,0.00035975763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0177262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073465295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46744657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000085220454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008102703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98881483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2432384416","doi":"","title":"The Enigma of Stigma: A New Environmental Contamination Challenge Facing Canada's Judiciary","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Plaintiff; Stigma (botany); Property (philosophy); Feeling; Law; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.02922733059646029,"score_gpt":0.2711385022332036,"score_spread":0.24191117163674333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2432384416","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88820755,0.057725236,0.000019357338,0.023525424,0.00094747427,0.00022186947,0.000025232706,0.000009712978,0.029318132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97997904,0.017144926,0.00003229633,0.00015256616,0.00039943715,0.0000011055437,3.174369e-7,0.000007426499,0.0022828816],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984801,0.0001483344,0.00039910674,0.00007810759,0.0006591597,0.00023521933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907154,0.0003094859,0.00040443343,0.0000788207,0.000024746874,0.00011098632],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047429293,0.00010622479,0.00024671922,0.00003146851,0.0007611508,0.000022031256,0.00022364016,0.000038082482,0.000055957036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015490474,0.00007584959,0.00008605721,0.00006411233,0.0003740074,0.00019457567,0.000060486454,0.00017539333,0.0000037467257],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024886878,0.0008951836,0.036090728,0.00008626365,0.0027172123,0.000510837,0.26695552,0.00029294463,0.003275255,0.08636935,0.18486463,0.4176932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089045794,0.000311417,0.026215635,0.000086133354,0.00011118755,0.000022266953,0.038751386,0.0000076027827,0.000531853,0.0008629713,0.9319926,0.00021652009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1724545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.58666736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74712795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036659613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012519458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8330562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2489364563","doi":"","title":"Six Degrees of Separation: Canadian Accessory Liability in Afghan War Crimes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Complicity; Doctrine; Causation; Law; Torture; Commit; Political science; Liability; War crime; Principal (computer security); Criminal law; Legal doctrine; Sociology; International law; Criminology; Human rights","score_opus":0.16316883978141764,"score_gpt":0.40295478023378983,"score_spread":0.2397859404523722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2489364563","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96176004,0.0059796497,0.000004931922,0.0022724848,0.0005413566,0.000103506005,0.00000513527,0.000007127454,0.029325793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979128,0.0011520752,0.00036769107,0.000062945306,0.00017239868,0.0000019640484,1.4122031e-7,0.0000050287786,0.0003249105],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985005,0.00019113226,0.0005293053,0.00011331015,0.00038754597,0.00027819758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869806,0.00019199497,0.0002969745,0.00010526767,0.0005423113,0.0001653822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015235828,0.00010428467,0.00036309782,0.00016213684,0.00028442597,0.00002271709,0.00035841065,0.000060227787,0.000093662005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00096012885,0.000085377906,0.00010624127,0.0002592985,0.0004778074,0.000707773,0.0000465809,0.00018566269,0.0000051697666],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039220884,0.00040654594,0.5549697,0.00019390079,0.00038667716,0.00043531618,0.38238978,0.00013673505,0.00019005769,0.039897986,0.01479871,0.005802343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005484491,0.00061478565,0.72982514,0.00039081107,0.00019329008,0.000021709327,0.11838874,0.000007750599,0.0011892581,0.004115947,0.14428768,0.00041640663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34285972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.869171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5263113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020571375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006646665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66151625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2492725761","doi":"","title":"Throwing Caution to the Wind: The Precautionary Principle, NAFTA and Environmental Protection in Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Precautionary principle; Government (linguistics); Supreme court; Corporation; Law; Economics; Arbitration; Environmental law; Damages; Political science; Law and economics; International trade","score_opus":0.018964589100477852,"score_gpt":0.22658185899853717,"score_spread":0.20761726989805931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2492725761","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9716458,0.00051098334,0.000081482794,0.025407728,0.00047873834,0.00027081821,0.0000020643774,0.000004728483,0.0015976962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99204636,0.00004827225,0.000021659303,0.007374527,0.00043812502,0.000007954048,0.0000015481381,0.0000053850463,0.000056185756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921757,0.000013324371,0.00026357034,0.00007775243,0.00032451455,0.00010326597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968714,0.00001824101,0.00018371122,0.00005103614,0.000052034946,0.000007820099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032356445,0.00008447823,0.00009883439,0.00006352745,0.00029440995,0.00007577285,0.00011370727,0.000011868074,0.000008755948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006366478,0.000047122634,0.000028198925,0.00011411963,0.000047731628,0.00064588396,0.00009182636,0.0001557079,0.000004686612],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00096538104,0.0007421464,0.0796177,0.00028542284,0.0014459293,0.00038507002,0.008679176,0.17483157,0.0074088927,0.7030784,0.014968968,0.0075913696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016881705,0.00011480298,0.4162368,0.000280625,0.00009324018,0.00016732284,0.009093959,0.0016947929,0.00050659175,0.0061541004,0.5636361,0.00033348746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10044073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35010442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69692427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037657632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000095445444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9055495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2496032426","doi":"","title":"Justice Defiled: Perverts, Potheads, Serial Killers and Lawyers","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Economic Justice; Law; Criminology; Political science","score_opus":0.04368018531065314,"score_gpt":0.3349392624279341,"score_spread":0.29125907711728094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2496032426","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8897786,0.035393935,0.00004242069,0.03474927,0.004604118,0.00024009465,0.000017854221,0.000070762566,0.035102934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9677811,0.024650676,0.0021715793,0.0015099557,0.0020218014,0.0000024815824,5.769379e-7,0.000016969983,0.0018448286],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987527,0.000097909724,0.00028362856,0.00011736063,0.0004781787,0.0002702092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916756,0.000097831784,0.00022207225,0.000060989165,0.0003133319,0.00013821603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007267309,0.00012794811,0.00030383526,0.000012487426,0.0010865448,0.00010627702,0.00019002712,0.00010131783,0.000028535194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000397705,0.00009424079,0.00014696708,0.00016435291,0.00061774463,0.00044170007,0.00005628554,0.0002621969,0.00000535935],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005246843,0.00037582783,0.0017822342,0.0002506131,0.0017362265,0.0004056462,0.5202402,0.0010718704,0.0006239017,0.36300293,0.10557869,0.004407158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020461872,0.00038971007,0.0011987727,0.00019462049,0.00048545466,0.000104634804,0.31224653,5.4565953e-7,0.00010440018,0.009465491,0.6734358,0.00032785436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032941773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013621034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5678571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015347736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001923379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8356934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2500099449","doi":"","title":"Stepping Forward or Stumbling Back? Command Responsibility For Failure To Act, Civilian Superiors and the International Criminal Court","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Doctrine; Statute; International law; Status quo; Customary international law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Sociology; Public international law","score_opus":0.07423058133334896,"score_gpt":0.36258965850681424,"score_spread":0.28835907717346526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2500099449","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9729514,0.00029531377,0.00026694004,0.02206307,0.00082770764,0.00035428352,0.00001870777,0.000010208348,0.0032123365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992544,0.00020654693,0.0014737154,0.0007023689,0.00086845504,0.000009649507,7.997833e-7,0.0000098649225,0.0041845934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829644,0.00016420467,0.00048370744,0.00015494252,0.00066851405,0.00023217814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974267,0.0010846241,0.00023996567,0.0000866497,0.0010537469,0.00010834436],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002163393,0.00013263553,0.00036546777,0.00012093545,0.0015287633,0.0001650067,0.00043081358,0.00003690545,0.00006169899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012652992,0.000076329656,0.00015414895,0.00006683878,0.00071770814,0.00044454206,0.00011522849,0.00020359986,0.0000037804007],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010540855,0.00019582735,0.00418696,0.00008646078,0.0014761867,0.00021799802,0.19581118,0.00009448111,0.00013831005,0.75638473,0.030159444,0.00070757477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0051771877,0.00071857765,0.0075946813,0.00031979274,0.00022770184,0.00034501593,0.035497677,0.000062878054,0.00018159224,0.020513494,0.92897505,0.0003863824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023292394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012003453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8988156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017141498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030147668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2507324678","doi":"","title":"Private Party Access to the Competition Tribunal: A Critical Evaluation of the Section 103.1 Experiment","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Merger and Competition Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Competition (biology); Section (typography); Order (exchange); Law; Perspective (graphical); Business; Political science; Advertising; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.10241826460849257,"score_gpt":0.3516379735212946,"score_spread":0.24921970891280204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2507324678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9384393,0.008252464,0.005059629,0.040425904,0.001786934,0.0003328648,0.000030506899,0.000010925028,0.0056614866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99850893,0.00029823976,0.00009254739,0.0008097173,0.00022533449,0.0000095460955,8.787853e-7,0.000004619928,0.00005016649],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998634,0.00011610972,0.0007669693,0.00012293668,0.00023635538,0.00012365337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874425,0.0000658519,0.00050193,0.00018532654,0.00045997163,0.000042689127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018645006,0.00009550262,0.00035246357,0.0001367845,0.00021521804,0.00007828222,0.00028223256,0.000026603326,0.00017548364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000580091,0.00006028102,0.0002280938,0.0003933123,0.00005593045,0.000260533,0.00006251836,0.00014348002,0.0000113947035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004808573,0.0016542536,0.023268782,0.00009176547,0.0019651859,0.0000089205,0.0108352285,0.026864538,0.002253395,0.8860949,0.038818244,0.0076638977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034817676,0.0015649358,0.5736395,0.00044189705,0.0008962408,0.00009222567,0.0041422076,0.0067459005,0.011893745,0.11803541,0.2783099,0.00075621594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001955073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034555054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7680595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012901222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002527159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24581887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510048207","doi":"","title":"Predatory Pricing in the Canadian Context","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Merger and Competition Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Predatory pricing; Competition (biology); Legislation; Context (archaeology); Subject (documents); Economics; Law and economics; Competition policy; Competition law; Positive economics; Sociology; Business; Industrial organization; Public economics; Law; Microeconomics; Political science; Ecology; Monopoly; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.048291475608333106,"score_gpt":0.25222358496364233,"score_spread":0.20393210935530923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510048207","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68561435,0.068110675,0.0002902775,0.0070557096,0.0013164739,0.00016686365,0.0000314679,0.000007670818,0.23740649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99757826,0.0006100039,0.00006594549,0.0012686071,0.000053027656,0.0000022296713,2.863006e-7,0.000005246014,0.0004164194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908185,0.00005138839,0.0005617052,0.000086863845,0.000056532557,0.00016166156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994007,0.000058836256,0.00029565982,0.00010913257,0.00007901629,0.00005668662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013615523,0.0000763731,0.0003259997,0.00031281286,0.00015893468,0.000059512502,0.0001717633,0.000026695901,0.00015916637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031293923,0.000058759324,0.00011880348,0.00028183273,0.000044147553,0.0001505719,0.000008788784,0.00020040423,0.000046421846],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008627351,0.00008039482,0.18406366,0.000020946263,0.0004131365,0.0001317196,0.007982549,0.00020976967,0.0000029561054,0.7961955,0.010379034,0.0005117136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053514226,0.00007868879,0.042722676,0.00003310759,0.000023372138,0.00006983377,0.00820088,0.000031631113,0.000019497804,0.012304389,0.9358106,0.0001701649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008960296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15438099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9254316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013986761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007370574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976391},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2511552638","doi":"","title":"Student-on-Student Harassment: A New Paradigm for Canadian Human Rights Legislation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal Issues in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Harassment; Law; Legislation; Complaint; Human rights; Respondent; Duty; Political science; Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Sociology","score_opus":0.05912060140927287,"score_gpt":0.41909496067436636,"score_spread":0.35997435926509347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2511552638","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87104183,0.003448028,0.00016573623,0.030550571,0.0058982656,0.0010567318,0.000010895446,0.00005187416,0.08777605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888698,0.00027219573,0.0003254913,0.00033066788,0.0031649112,0.000016930628,0.0000031370014,0.00001788514,0.00699897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976982,0.00014694704,0.0005892855,0.00020359698,0.0008671559,0.0004948353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983446,0.00020903483,0.00046636336,0.00016425127,0.00041754742,0.00039821604],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011019551,0.00019267255,0.00038781227,0.0003013003,0.0022281096,0.00027712688,0.0005075327,0.00008473995,0.00006129163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017721314,0.00016277502,0.00016987928,0.00029926214,0.00018282383,0.0006933982,0.000031379568,0.0002439543,0.00002317236],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001254343,0.0008621665,0.0729285,0.000018761599,0.0013980502,0.00020682033,0.35579434,0.00033220995,0.000065146785,0.41031873,0.15364236,0.0043074843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075365877,0.00038151816,0.030993467,0.000078763245,0.0001087329,0.000009620813,0.006927631,0.000001252909,0.000025102523,0.007206379,0.9533188,0.00019512845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10331647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6374114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7996764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012858723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005355792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2512505817","doi":"","title":"Online Liberty: Freedom of Expression in the Information Age","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Cyberspace; Jurisprudence; Scrutiny; Charter; Context (archaeology); Law; Sociology; Freedom of the press; Expression (computer science); Citizen journalism; Freedom of information; Social media; Political science; The Internet; Computer science","score_opus":0.04741096932963577,"score_gpt":0.34097948900723585,"score_spread":0.29356851967760006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2512505817","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9609575,0.0027050916,0.00029366827,0.008687104,0.00090158137,0.00021617896,0.000006913152,0.000016665681,0.026215268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957658,0.0024966793,0.0008646043,0.0003694725,0.00029529768,0.0000019011958,0.00000206709,0.0000032793496,0.00020090785],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983773,0.00017417008,0.000584924,0.00004359848,0.00068026915,0.00013971834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873155,0.0002751065,0.00054487464,0.00009338771,0.00031628978,0.0000388145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013010919,0.000076588534,0.00023633351,0.00016676344,0.00019718459,0.00005439407,0.00030297082,0.000052885724,0.000022909111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010147693,0.00004438633,0.000085985055,0.00032888245,0.00021873,0.001167874,0.0000466381,0.00019335204,0.0000035355165],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00091749773,0.0017232776,0.019814378,0.00014598337,0.00020497084,0.00035186796,0.6502928,0.002227824,0.0057083447,0.027320089,0.24358243,0.047710516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001955119,0.0003532619,0.038148563,0.00066726067,0.000045107787,0.000039345985,0.18120049,0.00006527374,0.00039257942,0.004407361,0.7725164,0.00020919325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038418468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013494635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.528934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042050076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006853077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18100218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2515154138","doi":"","title":"Taking the Risk out of Termination: An Enterprise Risk Management Analysis of the Normative System of Employment Standards Challenged by Honda v Keays","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Normative; Bad faith; Misconduct; Jurisprudence; Damages; Supreme court; Law; Labour law; Sociology; Reflexivity; Risk management; Power (physics); Law and economics; Business; Economics; Political science; Management","score_opus":0.04137045731393904,"score_gpt":0.2589071898184129,"score_spread":0.21753673250447383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2515154138","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96240264,0.010442815,0.0013782702,0.00008216069,0.0012027872,0.00037769516,0.001799601,0.0000072051184,0.022306798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99428755,0.0054699164,0.00009369967,0.000013444811,0.00007297179,0.000008368497,0.0000013880663,0.000014063151,0.000038621045],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99720407,0.00018013088,0.00205275,0.0001848721,0.00019894018,0.00017922926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915289,0.0000980357,0.007568327,0.0003898647,0.00036991874,0.000044923392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031719261,0.00016552123,0.0012310231,0.000308571,0.00021681692,0.0000242177,0.0005483416,0.0000518857,0.000029254801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012412042,0.000121924204,0.00052024407,0.0002879348,0.00030191394,0.00028398837,0.00016719819,0.00017621317,0.0000014272078],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005215105,0.0009099206,0.69063133,0.0007157898,0.03990525,0.000012814134,0.1933176,0.00153555,0.000020790636,0.06288868,0.0012693536,0.008271381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004737517,0.0021764166,0.8232442,0.0012485875,0.007351802,0.0000126444775,0.13699545,0.002388351,0.001990152,0.0073421616,0.011545897,0.00096678716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015409422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00091366103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13261288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027675324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024509047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49719247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2516282538","doi":"","title":"The Patentability of Human Embryonic Stem Cells: Is the Inconsistent Application of the European Union Biotechnology Directive’s Moral Exclusion Clause Undermining Investor Confidence in Europe, Providing a Competitive Advantage to the United States?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Directive; Patentability; European union; European commission; Legislation; Parliament; Convention; Law; Commission; Political science; Biotechnology; Business; International trade; Intellectual property; Biology; Politics; Patent law","score_opus":0.13142182781151915,"score_gpt":0.2663411164857857,"score_spread":0.13491928867426653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2516282538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99362046,0.00041780298,0.00020167156,0.0033207382,0.0002682551,0.00062902365,0.000004940565,0.0000145155145,0.0015226222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989709,0.00027399167,0.000012610444,0.00058894977,0.00006079286,0.000007941116,9.545498e-7,0.000017603203,0.00006623082],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805415,0.0005946015,0.0006704916,0.00017344748,0.0003063864,0.0002009199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99753225,0.00025551714,0.0010476379,0.00031412733,0.0008398572,0.000010602234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028848883,0.00017215013,0.00028727652,0.0001609463,0.00068143976,0.000052121857,0.00077339925,0.000034037035,0.0000026784212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028004823,0.000073087955,0.000085892636,0.00094486744,0.00057610136,0.00026164184,0.0008766467,0.0004131149,0.000005199116],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004225233,0.0031376956,0.34308243,0.0025268176,0.003251631,0.00017612206,0.24460387,0.003896429,0.16528311,0.15565453,0.0073594814,0.06680264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004211324,0.001997199,0.289698,0.004365829,0.0010811691,0.00007936973,0.45461634,0.006347301,0.120096855,0.0054828585,0.110664524,0.0013592526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015977039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016550621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21001245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007123546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003427179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52411526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2516859696","doi":"","title":"Sex Trafficking from Thailand to Japan: Human Beings or Illegal Goods?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Sex trafficking; Human trafficking; Scope (computer science); Human rights; Law; Order (exchange); Criminology; Business; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04094101819058774,"score_gpt":0.34267024339086244,"score_spread":0.3017292252002747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2516859696","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9644328,0.005919463,0.000018050387,0.0021526136,0.0012736709,0.00013496917,0.000002092266,0.00004660006,0.026019743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914098,0.0012418367,0.0006312289,0.0003404264,0.00093257305,0.0000021853248,5.0042314e-7,0.000022025853,0.0054194243],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978407,0.00027393983,0.0005594071,0.00020370552,0.00069101894,0.00043123384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987528,0.0003243009,0.00032078158,0.00011708702,0.00025708159,0.00022795786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011264445,0.00020363012,0.0005766758,0.000148922,0.0012270103,0.0001986752,0.0003292885,0.00012683096,0.00016705421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082474406,0.00013810219,0.00016881514,0.00042639842,0.00025742824,0.00033178792,0.000053272055,0.00041369037,0.000024460423],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022490176,0.00034687505,0.027908495,0.000025620782,0.0021331136,0.0007335958,0.90581745,0.00027571866,0.00096404663,0.008058102,0.046196584,0.00731549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009129241,0.00048414432,0.001563683,0.0003064114,0.0001949283,0.000033304692,0.29664174,0.0000010936777,0.00072620984,0.00089631963,0.69788015,0.00035910463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00086007797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016337107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65168357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012849801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015339331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94372946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2517440738","doi":"","title":"Risk v Benefits: The Use of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors in Children","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Sertraline; Escitalopram; Citalopram; Fluoxetine; Anxiety; Paroxetine; Psychiatry; Fluvoxamine; Depression (economics); Antidepressant; Childhood Depression; Psychology; Anxiety disorder; Medicine; Internal medicine; Serotonin","score_opus":0.0705143720072083,"score_gpt":0.28764234834421987,"score_spread":0.21712797633701159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2517440738","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99289453,0.0044329334,0.000005484843,0.00045534613,0.00088161166,0.0002018735,0.000024607176,0.0000067523665,0.001096881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99717814,0.0018647744,0.00021217889,0.0002248166,0.0002758878,0.000004351573,9.523569e-7,0.000012121153,0.00022675986],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858904,0.00015717956,0.0006494093,0.000139877,0.0002573893,0.00020713279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891984,0.00009717953,0.0005787205,0.000106339394,0.0002524761,0.000045462668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045548973,0.00015293868,0.00035522782,0.00013010848,0.00013687856,0.00001301965,0.00018931256,0.000058491194,0.00003564846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000117123345,0.00009293862,0.00016053372,0.00029804086,0.00014338607,0.00016628085,0.00006103858,0.00041704543,0.000008181313],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039200427,0.00058806146,0.94636524,0.00000889501,0.0011161177,0.000015273132,0.023323974,0.000043993416,0.000011879507,0.0027295793,0.0137287,0.011676266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007394161,0.00020681774,0.9907622,0.00019330003,0.000057842808,0.000056369103,0.001482055,2.9615492e-7,0.00012804661,0.0005329934,0.00573471,0.00010598611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045524718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000207466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04439691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047372512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044889624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37899268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2524336399","doi":"","title":"Individual Activity & Content Neutrality Under Section 2(d) of the Charter","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Neutrality; Scope (computer science); Law and economics; Normative; Common law; Sociology; Relevance (law); Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.09898911144550165,"score_gpt":0.27871528089371994,"score_spread":0.1797261694482183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2524336399","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99533397,0.00020427872,0.00009963228,0.0013090099,0.0015520956,0.00009490633,0.0000017482898,0.000011459031,0.0013929055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975746,0.000013165845,0.000008290556,0.00050827785,0.0016021384,5.419334e-7,3.7621166e-7,0.000008700728,0.00028386406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989157,0.000016800941,0.00040655027,0.00009206114,0.00039740672,0.0001715227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984944,0.000049567836,0.0008430915,0.00011590315,0.0004865471,0.000010513355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008916445,0.00012642528,0.0002952654,0.00010830884,0.0002531575,0.00008358353,0.00020496978,0.000039266088,0.000021849275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020746118,0.000071311355,0.00018284722,0.00018251965,0.00015081785,0.0008193198,0.00014175031,0.00024678156,0.000003636034],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002831584,0.002321906,0.4026476,0.0012729617,0.0055581643,0.00027034138,0.0063951486,0.00033958908,0.040970404,0.47739488,0.03903358,0.020963803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007521577,0.00005011344,0.96924794,0.00008276472,0.00022739009,0.000018887664,0.0010537554,0.0000037746904,0.0017684211,0.008798217,0.017861119,0.000135444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017390086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016694651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5666003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037184407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020712458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29079926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2524468930","doi":"","title":"Of Mice and \"Man\": Patentability of Genetic Material and the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Patentability; Intellectual property; Property (philosophy); Relation (database); Law and economics; Law; Political science; Business; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Patent law; Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07132463815187216,"score_gpt":0.23111638168892676,"score_spread":0.1597917435370546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2524468930","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99746007,0.0009761371,0.00005760673,0.00055875856,0.0002063227,0.00028536184,0.0000020484545,0.000004047614,0.00044966445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999409,0.00020850849,0.00007448209,0.00007631724,0.00017923063,0.0000017093241,2.9702457e-7,0.000005077442,0.000045383997],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988794,0.000055131608,0.000635255,0.000099302066,0.00022450606,0.000106423104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986641,0.00007531018,0.0006109745,0.00007507554,0.00056709506,0.0000074397285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006147026,0.00012485942,0.00045628054,0.000106631756,0.00012697375,0.00003365666,0.0001204665,0.000037340757,0.000022796565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041533538,0.00005515354,0.00007510319,0.0001466375,0.00042613441,0.0003116812,0.0000990878,0.00012302966,6.856923e-7],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.12702252,0.005706424,0.03889258,0.017626902,0.007904114,0.0001351199,0.10144676,0.0007214801,0.44329563,0.009807676,0.013122187,0.23431861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.042645648,0.01401911,0.3102438,0.0064271316,0.0059178295,0.0010623941,0.024297917,0.01031365,0.44687968,0.07592428,0.059257586,0.003010989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00072399504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000057149336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2713512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009338653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012598905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22490962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527722782","doi":"","title":"The (Comic) Tragedy of Formalism in Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Natural law; Comics; Hypocrisy; Natural (archaeology); Comedy; English law; Literature; Jurisprudence; Sociology; Philosophy; History; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.029604800040771553,"score_gpt":0.32042208436345887,"score_spread":0.29081728432268733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2527722782","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93117034,0.04089418,0.0000070978604,0.014465998,0.00060717127,0.0001740711,0.000009962598,0.0000060368657,0.012665121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912528,0.007571147,0.000049728867,0.00008424898,0.00031919897,0.0000021398457,1.414984e-7,0.000004665229,0.00071594864],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984253,0.00024361568,0.00053942186,0.00005610973,0.00052628317,0.0002092926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986123,0.00041867708,0.00052935845,0.00009217912,0.00032536863,0.000022134533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002428294,0.00008185618,0.00028505237,0.000009562896,0.00056747353,0.000028968965,0.00044100804,0.000056961748,0.000005916198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024944183,0.00003936012,0.0002146444,0.0002536656,0.0008177253,0.00019352927,0.000056660097,0.00030146862,5.688263e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032712572,0.00045106592,0.0066284076,0.00011067197,0.00086439995,0.000054306052,0.5925122,0.00085249613,0.001964936,0.32847017,0.06284026,0.004923947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010604723,0.00022664528,0.024231898,0.00022815603,0.00015443382,0.000021082053,0.3053331,0.000009359668,0.0012201655,0.015685989,0.65164584,0.0001828233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014104954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011340384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5888056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000061578976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010810823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63282007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527736621","doi":"","title":"Defining the Protected Groups in the Law of Genocide: Learning from the Experience of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Genocide; Tribunal; Law; International law; Crimes against humanity; Political science; Criminal law; Sociology; War crime; Criminology","score_opus":0.035426949917973766,"score_gpt":0.3293822217876631,"score_spread":0.2939552718696893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2527736621","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99016285,0.00040632233,0.00007272215,0.0056021106,0.000915933,0.00024333945,0.00001539249,0.0000031455486,0.0025781833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987261,0.000028879347,0.0002218907,0.0002703393,0.0005404288,0.000019377216,8.372808e-7,0.0000051162165,0.00018700067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820554,0.00025881137,0.00046550093,0.000085697335,0.000833675,0.00015078313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970597,0.0015243231,0.0006416328,0.00010398595,0.0006549356,0.000015406353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019929938,0.00008901105,0.00019030945,0.000026795675,0.001083358,0.00008997397,0.0011984594,0.00004039705,0.00003564617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011982284,0.00003491372,0.00017498781,0.000087270106,0.0010208521,0.00019897046,0.000101620324,0.0005716866,5.0559714e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011451265,0.00003199392,0.0017482459,0.0000039520382,0.000113335285,0.0000025505951,0.13729763,0.00004281572,0.0006879167,0.8595344,0.00019521995,0.00022745966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031604453,0.0006764591,0.14330056,0.00056787085,0.00039876526,0.00007711875,0.28983068,0.00015316912,0.008882043,0.25741273,0.2951073,0.00043282346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024830261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019300574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60212165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036948717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014625902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99859464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528019720","doi":"","title":"Risky Business: A Review of Dual Class Share Structures in Canada and a Proposal for Reform","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shareholder; Corporation; Common stock; Corporate governance; Equity (law); Institutional investor; Corporate structure; Voting; Accounting; Business; Corporate law; Agency cost; Dual (grammatical number); Finance; Economics; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.05390135005255746,"score_gpt":0.2931138911210068,"score_spread":0.2392125410684493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528019720","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022531278,0.99753654,9.365516e-7,0.00049117143,0.0006409903,0.0006588999,0.00010024178,0.0000043874934,0.00034149076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00031650768,0.997788,0.000088266424,0.00032184727,0.0013436334,0.000029656463,0.000025372525,0.00004107345,0.000045642555],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975457,0.000022765547,0.0014438167,0.00019277769,0.0004774252,0.0003174714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951106,0.000082916304,0.0036526835,0.00016018629,0.000972483,0.000021136],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006738976,0.00041542083,0.0026383433,0.00020327052,0.000085342836,0.00006020027,0.00027340357,0.00008219647,0.000022068922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033608172,0.00025825098,0.00025957453,0.0005884011,0.000074107826,0.0008396282,0.0002683266,0.0003560346,9.197509e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006099147,0.000044975448,0.00034632825,0.5062997,0.0006760642,0.00013577046,0.000036668545,7.88998e-7,1.904545e-7,0.0043158913,0.017846879,0.4702358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031139687,0.000018000477,0.00047092757,0.08162396,0.001428992,0.00008109512,0.00015914415,6.0837203e-7,1.058263e-7,0.00027553362,0.9153722,0.00025806224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21567127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.674514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8975253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045415654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017118757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528086873","doi":"","title":"What’s in a Name? The Feasibility and Desirability of Naming Forced Marriage as a Separate Crime Under International Humanitarian Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Phenomenon; Law; Forced marriage; Forced migration; Sierra leone; Sociology; International humanitarian law; Face (sociological concept); Criminology; Political science; International law; Refugee; Social science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05770563033119879,"score_gpt":0.37992582927932245,"score_spread":0.32222019894812365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528086873","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98851264,0.0012100312,0.000008037805,0.003831658,0.0011921193,0.00016731145,0.000005288875,0.000006022079,0.005066912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998639,0.0007138769,0.00010722691,0.000278725,0.00013526242,0.0000015531616,4.521291e-7,0.0000048522716,0.00011903494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984961,0.00023925597,0.00047404907,0.00013794484,0.0004516099,0.00020105431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987141,0.00032743323,0.0003221696,0.00012472954,0.00044877277,0.00006283241],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002640004,0.000110027555,0.00030420953,0.00005272055,0.0003711772,0.00018390082,0.0003384897,0.00007379739,0.000020030642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00085905974,0.00007850929,0.000097034805,0.00011840162,0.00095083204,0.00085956923,0.00013458321,0.00043898512,0.0000011396452],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035738302,0.0003724903,0.06618078,0.000054697728,0.00040141548,0.00006564495,0.12670647,0.00007753538,0.0010813881,0.8035465,0.00021575984,0.00093994604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028729057,0.00065344654,0.26083684,0.00033964514,0.00020985027,0.000099085824,0.35280338,0.00028638678,0.00014993257,0.3586627,0.022544751,0.00054109574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041046795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11435782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4448838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013908802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014813775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90180284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528344651","doi":"","title":"Employee Drug Testing: Orwellian Vision or Pragmatic Approach to Problems in the Workforce","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Human rights; Law; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Legislation; Political science; Civil liberties; Charter; Legitimacy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.0695673268313307,"score_gpt":0.3514494775894099,"score_spread":0.2818821507580792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528344651","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6979675,0.00703301,0.000097230586,0.011246123,0.0005309621,0.0013110965,0.0000036052388,0.000064198524,0.28174627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922421,0.0005595466,0.00074083277,0.00060309307,0.0007704098,0.00002415446,2.5147116e-7,0.000016626982,0.005043002],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972597,0.00041580095,0.0007569253,0.00018380952,0.0009625364,0.00042124293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846506,0.00060318445,0.00031480903,0.00013595229,0.00035631543,0.00012467057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034902503,0.00018023825,0.00048325758,0.00011740205,0.00074230257,0.00029770643,0.0006435338,0.000056478908,0.000030634477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013768811,0.00009692743,0.000087972425,0.0014025891,0.00021105097,0.0005951629,0.000046306093,0.000359363,0.000022498638],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003853327,0.0010968822,0.03363407,0.0005513129,0.0002983099,0.00025715487,0.77776176,0.009401926,0.00005892645,0.005448622,0.07848728,0.09261842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009925856,0.0008829628,0.009733049,0.0018518191,0.00010586877,0.000119780285,0.091824755,0.000032776446,0.000009809727,0.0037601376,0.89016736,0.000519126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033243853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052194856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8116801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011931859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002606453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5709266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528975407","doi":"","title":"The Role of Dignity in Canadian and South African Gender Equality Jurisprudence","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Jurisprudence; Jurisdiction; Disadvantage; Law; Sociology; Gender equality; Political science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.055525963570154956,"score_gpt":0.33650898016338376,"score_spread":0.28098301659322883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528975407","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9448121,0.026986834,0.0000034724128,0.0017943555,0.00029524646,0.00013584357,0.000023916473,0.00000826738,0.025939953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979058,0.0014926656,0.00011564699,0.0000494518,0.00016316205,0.0000021307162,6.4525985e-8,0.000006877606,0.00026422643],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979429,0.00036444093,0.000507766,0.000120524346,0.0006188011,0.00044553055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984228,0.00041961088,0.00037441918,0.00013073682,0.00039839436,0.0002540142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023068863,0.000113291244,0.00035089318,0.00011334217,0.00091097044,0.0000358503,0.00039777384,0.000058696784,0.000005500577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001733834,0.00007755338,0.0000761649,0.00037979725,0.0012836233,0.0002767065,0.00009831513,0.00032451117,0.0000021258443],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004639492,0.000036352376,0.33381456,0.0000102381155,0.000114861694,0.00008463933,0.6570135,0.00001217699,0.000020008658,0.007487838,0.00037137105,0.0009881076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047331152,0.00015301116,0.16730383,0.000055391443,0.000059797345,0.000025367031,0.22492528,0.000007598566,0.00010373644,0.0068964018,0.59972125,0.00027503356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20920058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44365257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59934986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031619368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007862174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79606545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529238904","doi":"","title":"Pulling the Ivy Out of the Windows: Presumptions of Privacy in the Home and R. v. Gomboc","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Expectation of privacy; Charter; Order (exchange); State (computer science); Search and seizure; Privacy law; Power (physics); Sociology; Business; Political science; Privacy policy; Law enforcement; Supreme court; Information privacy; Computer science","score_opus":0.06641061789450314,"score_gpt":0.3639180378415194,"score_spread":0.29750741994701624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529238904","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9738149,0.0030899893,0.0000052253445,0.021135923,0.0005491449,0.00014589244,0.00000337202,0.0000021293588,0.0012534151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99796134,0.0015219875,0.00006160092,0.00009130994,0.00023586192,0.0000023809641,2.7049694e-8,0.0000033694914,0.00012211158],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986732,0.00022654345,0.00038793051,0.00006618292,0.00049437647,0.0001517911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841523,0.0007764637,0.00039741775,0.00015978122,0.00022576649,0.000025368778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023106239,0.0000741117,0.00022809832,0.000034212666,0.00049649156,0.00004791555,0.00062509626,0.000034449145,0.000006369163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011448858,0.000031924395,0.00010634137,0.00016972735,0.0009936345,0.00024573048,0.00012916823,0.0004117176,5.594434e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017268796,0.0003526049,0.20238495,0.00017045494,0.00036850807,0.00002330379,0.6933301,0.00013463924,0.007302935,0.08364086,0.0063877474,0.0057312176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000737999,0.0002750041,0.62111956,0.0006148124,0.0003826791,0.000055276832,0.15235351,0.000012784196,0.0007495091,0.015746664,0.20771943,0.00023279604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00082122674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009308539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5409766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014870845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000098077224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5194383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529607162","doi":"","title":"Uncertain Territory: Family Reunification and the Plight of Unaccompanied Minors in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Migration, Health and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Family reunification; Refugee; Immigration; Legislation; Law; Scope (computer science); Political science; Convention; Best interests; Immigration law; Minor (academic); Convention on the Rights of the Child; Family law; Criminology; Sociology; Human rights","score_opus":0.03172936707329431,"score_gpt":0.31901654832073834,"score_spread":0.287287181247444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529607162","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.983287,0.012244988,0.000025504172,0.0020029978,0.00063251867,0.00013335857,0.0000047751682,0.0000022035492,0.0016666797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989867,0.00035040287,0.00007359853,0.00032085826,0.000129492,0.000002648476,7.225284e-7,0.00000594378,0.00012961274],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986447,0.00013603007,0.0007075286,0.000091121176,0.00023005088,0.00019054138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876845,0.0004104494,0.00046990652,0.00012451228,0.00016652259,0.00006017566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012173186,0.00009445999,0.0003412883,0.00011199801,0.000085603126,0.0000069436755,0.00013833462,0.000032326636,0.000006764885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009054694,0.000059115453,0.00003473446,0.00015886233,0.00012805202,0.0000638927,0.000015934584,0.00020493791,5.912746e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0068061734,0.00043635987,0.66671616,0.00034550234,0.0013476115,0.00047815152,0.16319323,0.00015924375,0.00072690233,0.04959511,0.07936631,0.030829268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023613651,0.000107545566,0.93627465,0.000054482738,0.000041276522,0.000054216107,0.044144023,0.000008069292,0.00008895427,0.00031111293,0.016474467,0.0000798622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56102866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.916452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35542333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016295216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002936089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4418945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529612912","doi":"","title":"When All Else Fails, Blame the Parents: An Analysis of Parental Responsibility Laws in Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Blame; Juvenile delinquency; Economic Justice; Law; Criminology; Poverty; Moral responsibility; Political science; Legal responsibility; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.043616866470318885,"score_gpt":0.3376268931768372,"score_spread":0.2940100267065183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529612912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909185,0.0038936865,0.000005477939,0.0029155763,0.00037578173,0.00013161254,0.000019543353,0.0000060485654,0.0017337821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99838674,0.0010290188,0.000019208728,0.00023770278,0.00022202183,0.000003156083,0.0000013783333,0.0000067536507,0.00009399141],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99690866,0.0006678919,0.0009207351,0.00017522504,0.0009859977,0.00034149532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801135,0.00040071554,0.0006939573,0.00018878891,0.0005712559,0.0001339181],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002576651,0.00014579522,0.00073105906,0.0001762135,0.00031917798,0.000083785104,0.0005148084,0.000047272202,0.000040291397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009945772,0.0000943385,0.00017391566,0.00095541973,0.00031555162,0.0007219677,0.00007799291,0.0002533908,5.080569e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033975192,0.00021058929,0.93797743,0.000023005912,0.0016792427,0.00018991466,0.054055512,0.00067384454,0.000046329038,0.0013826637,0.0015073204,0.0019144163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007458312,0.0002955084,0.5016062,0.0001383454,0.0010822292,0.000012945371,0.35635749,0.00007514949,0.000047580368,0.0016829316,0.1376213,0.0003344587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96733326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43637118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071120687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014646793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38470125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2530070683","doi":"","title":"Consultations Under the WTO's Dispute Settlement System","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Negotiation; Plaintiff; Alternative dispute resolution; Dispute board; Settlement (finance); Law; Dispute mechanism; Order (exchange); Respondent; Element (criminal law); Political science; Scope (computer science); Law and economics; Online dispute resolution; Business; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.025136383867939174,"score_gpt":0.31508902134992745,"score_spread":0.2899526374819883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2530070683","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42412737,0.009742178,0.0006018539,0.43941805,0.003398041,0.0008228324,0.00008556549,0.00022151254,0.12158263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99443156,0.0007096794,0.00015173055,0.0005168224,0.00045738273,0.0000030674662,7.8429264e-7,0.000010821473,0.0037181273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985354,0.00024458577,0.00041168483,0.00008290559,0.000529639,0.00019576252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998895,0.00031773222,0.00023611955,0.00009585739,0.00038149694,0.00007380919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006891147,0.00009678014,0.00021078259,0.00004540942,0.0011696981,0.0001288652,0.00027218688,0.000025554888,0.00027045686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011349752,0.000059669386,0.000079084195,0.00039419552,0.0004201557,0.00028722713,0.000025530313,0.0001539871,0.000051645526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028535356,0.000109900626,0.0017581314,0.000027587077,0.0006938967,0.00006466358,0.039097812,0.0017343609,0.000038014005,0.9090968,0.044917412,0.0024328835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048154083,0.00005023039,0.007430586,0.00008111415,0.00016343738,0.00004450284,0.072038025,0.0000069696384,0.000055641074,0.00039800562,0.9191192,0.0001307905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011743286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010652734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9086988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019603883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001422095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.899649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2530321078","doi":"","title":"Dual Citizenship and Forced Marriages","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Gender and Women's Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Law; Politics; Dual (grammatical number); International law; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Human rights; Phenomenon; Power (physics); Political science; Forced migration; Forced marriage","score_opus":0.055876296664376365,"score_gpt":0.3436201593320794,"score_spread":0.287743862667703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2530321078","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9493467,0.0047390186,0.000025135656,0.0051434305,0.0006772512,0.00007715421,0.0000021345875,0.00002153227,0.039967626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899686,0.0040715537,0.00015693271,0.00020292608,0.0007611714,0.0000012859857,1.5650149e-7,0.000007759158,0.0048296168],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987244,0.00014616613,0.00029919605,0.00010288945,0.00044135228,0.00028600742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914825,0.00020802506,0.00018602521,0.000058990267,0.0002545078,0.00014420092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008934391,0.00011059389,0.00030010112,0.000095737,0.00066186953,0.000094663745,0.00012292313,0.00004751081,0.00004391719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029050763,0.00007878249,0.00008233905,0.00016117179,0.0003203473,0.00021990393,0.000053894673,0.00016673446,0.0000060223124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00088074384,0.00031954606,0.14223085,0.00016362706,0.003945381,0.0050176615,0.42833948,0.00004730631,0.0016527424,0.18712154,0.19957575,0.030705376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036852586,0.0010491338,0.067594215,0.00021179028,0.00038273924,0.00087252166,0.20414424,0.0000044124663,0.0004301071,0.13452464,0.58626145,0.0008394826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006829678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003914631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3866857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005486252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000080242644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50906324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2530534243","doi":"","title":"Vaccine-Related Injuries: Why Canada Needs to Adopt a No-Fault Compensation Scheme in Light of the New H1N1 Vaccine","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Vaccination; Government (linguistics); Immunization; Damages; Human mortality from H5N1; Tort; Public health; Medicine; Political science; Virology; Law; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Immunology; Liability; Disease","score_opus":0.023681910565207954,"score_gpt":0.3616817524081455,"score_spread":0.3379998418429375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2530534243","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8244977,0.000610264,0.0000065127397,0.17001848,0.0029222993,0.00040962457,0.000005827005,0.000009449394,0.0015198654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921606,0.00015691966,0.0004948931,0.00464622,0.00072767626,0.000008418318,0.0000010654019,0.000019084406,0.0017851009],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968237,0.00038081032,0.0015919924,0.00013815035,0.00069193507,0.00037338288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99599046,0.0012211222,0.0010564569,0.00032462913,0.001151879,0.00025544004],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016169895,0.00019717321,0.0007443887,0.00018449142,0.00030445852,0.000010413963,0.00041273216,0.00015695044,0.00038093922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010019363,0.00011877378,0.00009499562,0.00077057094,0.000032267068,0.00027917355,0.00024460317,0.0019556747,0.000019663743],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00085556175,0.0002677921,0.21358934,0.00048077793,0.0004582484,0.00003409299,0.035893247,0.000049237136,0.0076513374,0.0028093348,0.73712516,0.0007858627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018847006,0.00029408516,0.07235116,0.0007957499,0.00009794999,0.0000095118585,0.015586725,0.000019914445,0.0004618622,0.00025398156,0.90808415,0.00016017698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.118192576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5910024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47280985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018811748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016978412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2530544408","doi":"","title":"Restoring and Maintaining Order in Complex Peace Operations: The Search for a Legal Framework","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); Law; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Business","score_opus":0.1044289737148858,"score_gpt":0.40983316635235156,"score_spread":0.30540419263746577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2530544408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9748254,0.0017540903,0.0017249755,0.015982274,0.00041891975,0.00021087496,0.0000026479697,0.000009004971,0.0050718295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99401325,0.0005916977,0.002425561,0.00028690524,0.0008575016,0.0000069772104,3.8691797e-7,0.0000067232727,0.001811013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891084,0.00013135614,0.00027813556,0.00008634275,0.00038679305,0.0002065116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987797,0.0005210741,0.000073985095,0.000051952284,0.000532476,0.000040779174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015845952,0.00007288153,0.00017549774,0.00008320842,0.0011364796,0.00019495489,0.00019444207,0.00003365391,0.000021567757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000515096,0.000047026617,0.000045897537,0.000107852175,0.0002682093,0.0003440535,0.00004937706,0.00026705995,0.0000012151739],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062554645,0.000025119303,0.0015693685,0.0000042645174,0.00006688207,0.0000380248,0.025087208,0.0005493122,0.000011944875,0.97178096,0.00051414286,0.00029020256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001239364,0.00040558807,0.018862685,0.0003729648,0.000059126793,0.00011753276,0.04949231,0.00045014077,0.000023622713,0.07777405,0.8509033,0.00029935534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001043796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010755165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8940069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013194005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013964398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8740997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531009826","doi":"","title":"The Practice of Principle: In Defense of a Pragmatist Approach to Legal Theory","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03918575256515755,"score_gpt":0.379507126859882,"score_spread":0.3403213742947245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531009826","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35428852,0.014933688,0.0006768746,0.00336617,0.00068252883,0.00044831462,0.000010722367,0.0000073097735,0.62558585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99605113,0.0011476389,0.001620928,0.00010398938,0.00007954923,0.0000082425895,8.642552e-8,0.0000055012506,0.0009829242],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975516,0.00080133096,0.00068677776,0.0000974248,0.00067523104,0.00018759316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958816,0.0020074716,0.000713827,0.000096286625,0.0012547651,0.00004600523],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004310527,0.00010502427,0.00039969545,0.0000939406,0.00034216925,0.000027906233,0.00028627607,0.000025075968,0.0000045644892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009264385,0.00006642388,0.000108993256,0.00035447447,0.0005134126,0.000373685,0.00008458599,0.00019198903,0.0000015552638],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002290776,0.0002380376,0.0016932593,0.000015562428,0.00036256574,0.000010529085,0.022282917,0.00013579309,0.000034781162,0.97318286,0.001492115,0.00032249198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004904143,0.0003237995,0.0035718316,0.00010603577,0.000075531534,0.000039625003,0.07921722,0.0000031502314,0.00030108888,0.006398316,0.90935093,0.0001220696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003008543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001221715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96678454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010330635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022762951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531384980","doi":"","title":"Mediation: Principles, Process, Practice (Canadian Edition)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Process (computing); Sociology; Political science; Law; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.028163035938826783,"score_gpt":0.28161693436902974,"score_spread":0.25345389843020294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531384980","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038588118,0.0030103736,0.00006197307,0.065278865,0.0023302385,0.00022285899,0.00001051959,0.000090283946,0.8904068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833926,0.0011746208,0.00020042207,0.006879851,0.0058420417,0.000009800849,0.00001017423,0.000023583196,0.0024669217],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987662,0.000013389271,0.00043324733,0.00011226353,0.00044145188,0.00023348555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984124,0.00005835184,0.0004185715,0.000092957496,0.0009732294,0.000044505487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004388272,0.00013092248,0.0002208536,0.00024578217,0.00043488076,0.00024445864,0.00018295403,0.000043375047,0.0008814323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059254206,0.00010833069,0.00009644933,0.00044791962,0.00007409082,0.0032793796,0.000023179831,0.00022768187,0.00038886105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003651368,0.00088830286,0.0058902977,0.00039908648,0.0016023995,0.00073655066,0.0010344796,0.0032707823,0.00002171327,0.291303,0.6334855,0.061002765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034215552,0.000018500894,0.003949332,0.000039236173,0.000114503055,0.000081204635,0.001340002,0.00010798523,0.000002684824,0.0005826379,0.9932996,0.00012216567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011886915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066639404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9448045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010669067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017781461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96510655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2534225366","doi":"","title":"Canadian Health Law & Policy","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.07395744038177174,"score_gpt":0.47019743639727407,"score_spread":0.3962399960155023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2534225366","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2767548,0.01082732,0.0000032267294,0.5976331,0.0011855694,0.00035738188,0.00003268666,0.000035569505,0.11317031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9327077,0.0055818176,0.00034479887,0.049104866,0.0026938722,0.000006757748,0.000001947342,0.000021195938,0.00953699],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99723226,0.00061982113,0.000967092,0.00012107545,0.00040759039,0.000652134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99765956,0.0006594305,0.00041354194,0.00018279921,0.00036701543,0.0007176196],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002039251,0.00014119461,0.0005918517,0.00015257926,0.0010661584,0.000014243492,0.00021973315,0.000090978945,0.0018187488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001331999,0.00009993135,0.00010392804,0.00025341407,0.00014950398,0.00031962513,0.00003477796,0.0010151974,0.0003991997],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002973042,0.00025064172,0.011743541,0.0006208591,0.00068520475,0.00038764294,0.057738405,0.000024749577,0.0000103898965,0.10985649,0.76638967,0.0519951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004572705,0.00029627277,0.0039408174,0.00027635775,0.000023910237,0.000030245521,0.0073280297,9.421797e-7,0.0000017215896,0.0015902708,0.9859687,0.000085449785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43614632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39491326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65595293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007072223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029833214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2545063720","doi":"","title":"Developments in Canadian Adult Guardianship and Co-Decision-Making Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Legal guardian; Law; Autonomy; Political science; Legislation; Guardian; Paternalism; Sociology","score_opus":0.031002948268392703,"score_gpt":0.37726675423942974,"score_spread":0.346263805971037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2545063720","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8098025,0.0026188612,0.000021739905,0.013238097,0.0002503698,0.00019522745,0.000010791764,0.000014277597,0.17384815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965342,0.0007179919,0.001098827,0.0014090359,0.00014615004,0.0000015688842,2.0382099e-7,0.000004273159,0.00008773868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988748,0.00005429533,0.00034700334,0.00010171708,0.00031026674,0.00031190613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919546,0.00017179019,0.00014036527,0.00005865557,0.00024489552,0.00018884926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081066764,0.000086247055,0.00022349945,0.00013209555,0.00063890876,0.00011315175,0.000187188,0.00004800439,0.0000056256863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000455844,0.00007292251,0.000042491516,0.00023185794,0.00015146317,0.00031638338,0.000020425268,0.00019674927,0.000006178889],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046119054,0.00007666317,0.057981174,0.0000101639625,0.00010310184,0.00027228167,0.043173186,0.00004228305,0.00002486205,0.8285176,0.004407655,0.06534489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047757398,0.00007822811,0.18660918,0.00029277187,0.000022027796,0.000026072577,0.0114904465,0.0000030089893,0.000014548145,0.016705044,0.7840533,0.00022778714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.065443985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70964056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8118126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028307064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004169715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9407793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2546484979","doi":"","title":"(Un)Chained Wives: Understanding the Bruker v. Markovitz Decision, and Possible Alternative Legal Claims for Jewish Women Who Are Denied a Get","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judaism; Law; Wife; Jurisprudence; Economic Justice; Sociology; Doctrine; Hebrew; State (computer science); Intervention (counseling); Political science; Psychology; Theology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04250719309193344,"score_gpt":0.33053769948494455,"score_spread":0.2880305063930111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2546484979","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9734553,0.0049218233,0.0010106275,0.016781086,0.0017442476,0.00067879056,0.000037249196,0.000036993704,0.0013338628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99328583,0.0020784508,0.0016321886,0.00048486487,0.0012408061,0.000045650133,5.12119e-7,0.000028243365,0.0012034234],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971061,0.00022808279,0.00068262964,0.00031742555,0.00094878365,0.00071700476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99581903,0.0018788686,0.000881996,0.0001580827,0.0010113812,0.00025061524],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022312177,0.00033524312,0.00082896324,0.000117324314,0.0035101057,0.0005256699,0.00057051075,0.0001367903,0.000029964305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028494503,0.00020099086,0.00024967344,0.00034664272,0.0014531829,0.0009543857,0.0002929122,0.00068473414,0.0000022079255],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022300468,0.0004254849,0.045936234,0.00019129751,0.0069477987,0.00033016317,0.7284697,0.00011238054,0.0010336356,0.13531601,0.052675992,0.02633124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0044911266,0.0006603893,0.031520408,0.000430579,0.0003521009,0.000088581604,0.74759436,0.000100352256,0.00013197721,0.07671114,0.13709947,0.00081950345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047866002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007531832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08442348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061368255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014528565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2547489690","doi":"","title":"\"This is What the Others Have Done\": The Impact of Confederation on the Use of Precedent in Newfoundland Supreme Court Decisions From 1932-1958","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Dominion; Jurisdiction; Dominance (genetics); Political science; Context (archaeology); Common law; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.1572676411408118,"score_gpt":0.3686587613018798,"score_spread":0.211391120161068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2547489690","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96924496,0.00395708,0.0000111539175,0.02530676,0.0003626075,0.00046159653,0.000031005206,0.0000060522616,0.0006188049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827105,0.016223548,0.000059301517,0.00036913576,0.00023941322,0.000009167157,6.7386316e-7,0.000011195867,0.0003770596],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99693656,0.0006984914,0.00078576006,0.0001562695,0.0011311072,0.0002917972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935263,0.0044983514,0.0008809817,0.00022628836,0.0008059832,0.000062142004],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012786617,0.00021403593,0.00057872967,0.0000562939,0.0016324294,0.00023982859,0.00051508506,0.00008161197,0.000099829274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024100153,0.00008780776,0.0003934132,0.00019629861,0.001456151,0.000787169,0.0001252362,0.00042934876,0.000005265635],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063418265,0.000405115,0.18324777,0.0000074737304,0.0026118793,0.0000266734,0.74319464,0.002553564,0.0006998787,0.0015395817,0.06250364,0.002575607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022672464,0.0010119325,0.6742917,0.0009865462,0.00035152343,0.000022890796,0.25663382,0.00021170116,0.00065048103,0.0009869919,0.062106762,0.00047843493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10112456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.080135785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4910439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046478506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018954043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2548292026","doi":"","title":"Compelling War Correspondents to Testify: A Prerogative of International Criminal Tribunals?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Testimonial; Privilege (computing); Law; Tribunal; Witness; Political science; Legitimacy; Criminal procedure; Confidentiality; Sociology; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.04074360226860753,"score_gpt":0.3659157563073452,"score_spread":0.32517215403873767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2548292026","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9812771,0.00060690515,0.00040293817,0.0013532018,0.0014575687,0.00011802641,0.000026380401,0.000011931752,0.014745935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933138,0.000070790054,0.0011284673,0.00010545498,0.00096492446,0.0000020804714,0.00000189722,0.000007888686,0.0044046794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795175,0.000116311174,0.00060493493,0.00011508149,0.0010186267,0.00019327945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972413,0.00036165543,0.0005334712,0.000055164885,0.0017344815,0.00007391678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079749466,0.00011662401,0.00032713643,0.00023502184,0.00031756947,0.000051885934,0.00043351733,0.00003847835,0.00009427337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042478263,0.00009290759,0.0001477289,0.00010939089,0.00027414568,0.00035232666,0.00007106,0.00016311737,0.000017415088],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00074050337,0.00050253863,0.00595691,0.000029924082,0.00063721364,0.00019353103,0.03850725,0.001206265,0.00090899755,0.9414212,0.0094189355,0.0004767466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00524557,0.0024695443,0.10166966,0.0020157313,0.0007689927,0.00017332488,0.03716278,0.0001536636,0.012131059,0.1959491,0.64103776,0.0012227802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007315817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013673444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7454721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019678453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001601237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37886614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2552407563","doi":"","title":"Governing the Sulphur Dioxide Emissions of Multinational Corporations: Putting the Breaks on the Race-to-the-Bottom","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Race to the bottom; Multinational corporation; Harm; Greenhouse gas; Race to the Top; Race (biology); Global warming; Corporate governance; Environmental law; State responsibility; Politics; Political science; Business; Law; Climate change; International law; Sociology; Globalization; Ecology","score_opus":0.03130295072663826,"score_gpt":0.3190632385508857,"score_spread":0.28776028782424745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2552407563","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35749462,0.000552198,0.00017688208,0.63560545,0.0014462819,0.00043306814,0.00002212438,0.000024532763,0.00424482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995707,0.00011160258,0.0005235009,0.0011646843,0.0009847005,0.000007876915,5.710869e-7,0.000014421195,0.0014856373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769574,0.0004376458,0.0005114396,0.00010796708,0.0010441474,0.00020305322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946106,0.0033907753,0.0008496557,0.00022171035,0.0008640795,0.00006317503],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034638087,0.00012317461,0.00019631126,0.000047533616,0.0031830415,0.00015497845,0.00083016854,0.00004159277,0.000078105186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008567471,0.000050598643,0.00011746206,0.0006826261,0.0007020296,0.00023140632,0.00013933492,0.0007682621,0.000017589706],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004225971,0.00020114054,0.016328791,0.000010328863,0.00047453615,0.000013982036,0.097635955,0.0020326478,0.006593423,0.80025566,0.072945096,0.0034662124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036906512,0.00007462743,0.09651715,0.00012633858,0.00013417151,0.000038929433,0.039874867,0.000060950162,0.0011430745,0.0018441459,0.8596646,0.0001520455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002108597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032666447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7984115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006528143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028307433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2554554291","doi":"","title":"The Judge as Politician: Review of In Defense of a Political Court","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.033910931738621766,"score_gpt":0.3537553172220859,"score_spread":0.31984438548346417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2554554291","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25046209,0.3358823,0.0000020177542,0.055643965,0.00051642174,0.0002833283,0.000021825505,0.00000955361,0.3571785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87708735,0.12149555,0.000026803913,0.0009091201,0.00024170203,0.0000027218307,1.10815776e-7,0.0000035322562,0.00023307555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978508,0.00023443048,0.00079399627,0.00007879568,0.00069356407,0.00034846232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827695,0.0006043161,0.0003024544,0.00007845617,0.0006519938,0.00008585199],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015107162,0.00010281291,0.0005662821,0.000054140302,0.00038263077,0.000011612539,0.00025476492,0.000036174046,0.00005850894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017148926,0.000064986874,0.00020151962,0.00031479786,0.0017647317,0.00012640397,0.00004827563,0.00018066823,0.00000863882],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007681528,0.00010917289,0.0028538257,0.00014860465,0.00021111027,0.000044916414,0.0024687015,0.0000015880807,0.0000047351373,0.9875299,0.003395053,0.0031555882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010250786,0.0006576893,0.02503078,0.0091776885,0.0004032071,0.00010057118,0.038126603,6.2120665e-7,0.000112388996,0.15521409,0.76981306,0.00033822661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055737966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025089653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8323158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011550167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049337454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84259504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592943669","doi":"","title":"The problems of false comparions: Animal discourse and the anti-choice movement.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Sociology; Personhood; Argument (complex analysis); Environmental ethics; Criminology; Politics; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03130030491597535,"score_gpt":0.2898265267274124,"score_spread":0.25852622181143703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592943669","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96407366,0.0062661925,0.000035405945,0.028028402,0.00015606123,0.00017251266,0.000007849387,0.000004153239,0.0012557878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923447,0.007029159,0.000062785984,0.0002961949,0.00007778985,0.0000041375956,7.405516e-8,0.000008092557,0.00017711044],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861735,0.00013566877,0.00046392198,0.000115031515,0.00048259067,0.00018540975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848914,0.00083013065,0.0004455032,0.00016182616,0.00001950956,0.00005389552],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011769849,0.000133127,0.00028642442,0.000014282233,0.00044926628,0.000028184493,0.00030835357,0.000030107723,0.000020460631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022286442,0.000049695747,0.00009857349,0.00007559005,0.003205322,0.0003350763,0.00038745932,0.000210399,0.000009703137],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019356257,0.001218492,0.75568724,0.00017057947,0.0025754138,0.00007418174,0.019967107,0.0019195329,0.09708017,0.0800385,0.017628677,0.02170451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010830907,0.001973854,0.7703766,0.00087393896,0.0006474132,0.00016936767,0.011096283,0.00007935612,0.0066271205,0.10376398,0.092811875,0.00074929855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000091211514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020404477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09045305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005306857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000071558093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99950737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594295794","doi":"","title":"Who is harmed by fantasy? A deliberative and Charter analysis of Canada's pornography law.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Pornography; Law; Charter; Harm; Sociology; Legislation; Child pornography; Law enforcement; Criminal law; Political science; The Internet","score_opus":0.025567128618656405,"score_gpt":0.3228689394636592,"score_spread":0.2973018108450028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594295794","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98452747,0.007409174,0.000052459945,0.005171518,0.00044851587,0.00007679547,0.00031219362,0.000013154316,0.001988746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967335,0.00047007663,0.00004495109,0.0008480574,0.00005298416,0.000005892729,0.0000016424472,0.000013997032,0.001828897],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984039,0.00011617736,0.00065402413,0.0002212667,0.0003054229,0.00029919372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984704,0.0002458382,0.00055635965,0.00021874727,0.0004134899,0.000095132804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030964796,0.00019621591,0.00087695377,0.00036756578,0.00012214891,0.000013286922,0.00019852282,0.000096606986,0.00014798976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005255544,0.00012281528,0.00017641218,0.0004779198,0.00047970994,0.00012056478,0.0000694564,0.0001803536,8.4671996e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007651202,0.00075828156,0.43664092,0.000042521202,0.046944033,0.0006480729,0.0309145,4.6988475e-7,0.010722778,0.025722865,0.4236998,0.023140643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0072913263,0.0027040304,0.43949142,0.00022731899,0.009550955,0.000382157,0.0284697,0.000003169774,0.015312484,0.0012610904,0.49413648,0.001169852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024732115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1291664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.104434274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052198764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059692942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9817623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594432468","doi":"","title":"Re Indalex: The confluence of pension, insolvency, and fiduciary law.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Insolvency; Duty; Law; Supreme court; Creditor; Pension; Business; Bankruptcy; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Finance; Debt","score_opus":0.051694270192047136,"score_gpt":0.3481389749984826,"score_spread":0.2964447048064355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594432468","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9330189,0.0064461757,0.000043409003,0.043258086,0.0002428685,0.00015764486,0.00001799787,0.0000113876595,0.016803524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99584585,0.0027739266,0.00012440287,0.00040937573,0.00019829423,0.0000023408807,4.6020695e-8,0.0000046301284,0.00064110657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989704,0.000105551044,0.00035011314,0.000087387234,0.00034230854,0.00014422306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853086,0.00045263156,0.0003668482,0.0001198209,0.00046915386,0.000060669427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009672007,0.00007366634,0.00021704254,0.00002824865,0.00056485494,0.000029452536,0.00026232912,0.000035694185,0.000025098389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043681028,0.00003549781,0.00006570829,0.00012811106,0.0010597116,0.00029650723,0.00011995907,0.000120900855,0.0000030666615],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008848306,0.00014193049,0.017815713,0.000050104016,0.00033219467,0.000033165878,0.05086605,0.0000045809516,0.006113061,0.89383364,0.019277241,0.011443848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000443268,0.00014765104,0.026285263,0.00021959528,0.000064988155,0.000015687234,0.016235242,4.730441e-7,0.0011451185,0.012845878,0.94246703,0.00012982458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005460632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033545047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92318976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031895575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012172674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43444648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789297527","doi":"","title":"Profit Shifting by Canadian Multinational Corporations: Prospects of Reversal under Canada's Country-by-Country Reporting Rules","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Base erosion and profit shifting; Multinational corporation; Profit (economics); Unitary state; Apportionment; Law; Economics; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.022408807099521626,"score_gpt":0.26423164868317767,"score_spread":0.24182284158365605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789297527","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97012514,0.0032160205,0.00011366111,0.005401808,0.0016111458,0.00037499904,0.0001244457,0.00004382163,0.018988974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957632,0.000024274023,0.00036058103,0.0016612009,0.0012285174,0.0000044206904,0.00004959657,0.00002464382,0.0008835785],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974843,0.000017640572,0.0013509674,0.00018605802,0.0006539512,0.00030704425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935482,0.00007226387,0.0042109364,0.000114120136,0.0020085282,0.00004596019],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091569783,0.00020382968,0.0004437308,0.00020959489,0.000529022,0.0002098949,0.00021585854,0.000060650145,0.00006947771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021725162,0.00017516017,0.000058681737,0.00042299912,0.00018904796,0.0011258619,0.00006893941,0.0002334717,0.0000069438643],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014198321,0.00014296714,0.2765713,0.00049007416,0.0008870576,0.00019004413,0.0013970198,0.00013177721,0.002633383,0.0680735,0.64785135,0.0014895315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010488266,0.00006913781,0.036169168,0.0004345825,0.0001887413,0.00004239091,0.0058275918,0.00040055462,0.0007362188,0.00093887304,0.9536547,0.000489216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8253309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9328747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30580333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030493925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071642385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7142824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791218475","doi":"","title":"Experts for Hire: A Dangerous Practice Which Increases the Risk of Bias and Disadvantages the Accused","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Context (archaeology); Law; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Relevance (law); Divergence (linguistics); Political science; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.06541093926273694,"score_gpt":0.2976347320918023,"score_spread":0.23222379282906536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791218475","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9426229,0.045547176,0.00050060486,0.0054366947,0.0013245292,0.00041765886,0.00019782898,0.000009866334,0.0039427485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98671186,0.011323548,0.0002723802,0.0003951309,0.0011747087,0.000016904001,6.2870333e-7,0.000021399608,0.00008345391],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839425,0.00010833062,0.001032557,0.00018391747,0.00006527899,0.00021564307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99499106,0.0020223965,0.0022930868,0.00024830032,0.00039298675,0.00005219079],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028539023,0.00014481334,0.00069625274,0.00007940767,0.0005004258,0.00011303921,0.00031393216,0.000053201507,0.0000065860895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054383157,0.00009555598,0.00016506847,0.00013001812,0.00046760065,0.00049917796,0.00012331645,0.00013549013,0.0000052584746],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023297726,0.00095540704,0.5728085,0.0003270093,0.009931372,0.000027162392,0.066553876,0.00010850204,0.00011491435,0.26982626,0.06613382,0.010883407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034419545,0.0022290049,0.045232926,0.00020325462,0.0005617334,0.00029628168,0.03563348,0.00023591451,0.00043672996,0.04707618,0.86403966,0.0006128725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015370902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011458256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79790586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058424852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035371184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65105647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792288245","doi":"","title":"Ethics, Legal Professionalism and Reconciliation: Enacting Reconciliation Through Civility","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Civility; Sociology; Law; Legal ethics; Economic Justice; Harassment; Political science","score_opus":0.24842312770623612,"score_gpt":0.4922463388024223,"score_spread":0.24382321109618618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792288245","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5417547,0.0040391567,0.00036351496,0.37476897,0.008422394,0.00032204294,0.000011226614,0.00006613156,0.07025182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876165,0.0012998751,0.0022430092,0.0032841924,0.002221507,0.0000057809684,0.0000017876173,0.000010002651,0.0033173952],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974713,0.00071341865,0.00070600066,0.00017818516,0.0006995849,0.00023155857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99368876,0.0015310943,0.0009786229,0.00011804652,0.0036089988,0.00007450362],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00589672,0.00012822103,0.0002800985,0.00009353657,0.0020221688,0.00024910658,0.00017150576,0.00014878293,0.0001703742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016677136,0.00010841477,0.00006786311,0.0004834953,0.0006640739,0.0034059696,0.000058227037,0.0010393899,0.000017010556],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022615227,0.00025709457,0.009926248,0.000099343684,0.0004824761,0.000017164883,0.59454167,0.0000034125621,0.00033065828,0.30956125,0.064955294,0.01959925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032160277,0.00012330724,0.0042625833,0.000112092,0.00005248805,0.000026352722,0.071225375,0.0000039753636,0.00020209375,0.0076562567,0.9158714,0.00014250181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002367014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057937023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8509161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000275228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018026757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99927706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792894764","doi":"","title":"By All Unlawful Means? An Inquiry into the Scope of the Unlawful Means Tort","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Certainty; Tort; Law; Plaintiff; Economic Justice; Interpretation (philosophy); Supreme court; Scope (computer science); Liability; Legal certainty; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06812664938748614,"score_gpt":0.38641440689530343,"score_spread":0.3182877575078173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792894764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91357267,0.008605593,0.0002957543,0.04078743,0.0018770505,0.0005123976,0.00002110728,0.000037641137,0.034290366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941886,0.0018680112,0.0002734257,0.0009924254,0.0014779536,0.0000072573316,6.0017226e-7,0.000016175592,0.0011755691],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977566,0.0003279949,0.00059751293,0.00017063633,0.0008396181,0.00030764155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99788904,0.00019963266,0.0006057641,0.00035667332,0.00082622806,0.00012265748],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018584182,0.00016092054,0.00033774337,0.000038523922,0.0013962633,0.0001122792,0.0011749185,0.00007062857,0.00003426867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003937262,0.00008493852,0.00019225715,0.00041367774,0.002197351,0.000494465,0.00026695235,0.00031765222,0.000011265225],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001624668,0.00066627853,0.0058218255,0.000051635387,0.0013493786,0.00001109377,0.58420783,0.000105656116,0.0051007816,0.17873202,0.20980784,0.013983208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024750986,0.00023460336,0.0018797575,0.00005900726,0.00012806791,0.0000058763767,0.032994993,0.000006156199,0.0016538176,0.0025401553,0.960114,0.00013604872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002881149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012867789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7503062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014123127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026913214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793194118","doi":"","title":"When Google Becomes the Norm: The Case for Privacy and the Right to be Forgotten","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Internet privacy; Charter; Right to be forgotten; Personally identifiable information; Globe; Jurisdiction; Norm (philosophy); Law; Business; Political science; Sociology; Data Protection Act 1998; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.04989791015890382,"score_gpt":0.3422379807863614,"score_spread":0.2923400706274576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793194118","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4142108,0.0058536525,0.0008997479,0.573661,0.001568796,0.0013241668,0.00004779388,0.000026221693,0.0024077601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99233866,0.000914316,0.0005439526,0.0032941608,0.0022704075,0.000042882097,3.9160537e-7,0.000010809044,0.0005844001],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986347,0.00031011883,0.00032995708,0.00012613795,0.00032489077,0.00027419388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997861,0.0010434929,0.00028677913,0.00026421636,0.00046953297,0.00007494744],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036040035,0.00012247363,0.00026105627,0.00004464207,0.0036791223,0.0002879274,0.0007718018,0.0000406639,0.00001542022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032659231,0.00004878006,0.00012168768,0.0001677893,0.0012513677,0.0004617428,0.00051603204,0.00021703831,0.000003917631],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00084819866,0.00009490313,0.0007909563,0.000037433438,0.0008442969,0.00010439288,0.43368238,0.0000017778683,0.000031880565,0.0646392,0.48277077,0.0161538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000813073,0.0002735256,0.0004610796,0.00001894736,0.0001437605,0.00026111156,0.030772116,0.000012287277,0.00008633601,0.039916188,0.92714566,0.00009594231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024351575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021482881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57812786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000064596505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009142788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99761796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016750273","doi":"","title":"Patient v. God: Determining the Standard of Care for Christian Science Practitioners in Medical Negligence Cases","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medical negligence; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.034342414452244195,"score_gpt":0.3832997399443293,"score_spread":0.34895732549208514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3016750273","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98653305,0.0054840744,0.000093213006,0.003382265,0.0013414116,0.00031122274,0.000019290608,0.000008338191,0.002827159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985134,0.0005036122,0.00019402984,0.0001444639,0.00062366895,0.000006946263,1.6788367e-7,0.0000058166975,0.000007868937],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976069,0.00010873075,0.0005742688,0.00013023449,0.0012970961,0.0002827916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960459,0.00057205727,0.0006277957,0.00007900652,0.002568804,0.00010643143],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020436982,0.00009296041,0.00035226316,0.00012196657,0.0011480006,0.000080272825,0.000373186,0.00004639437,0.000012079904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008701462,0.00005853717,0.0000755022,0.0005487711,0.002226488,0.0005729501,0.00008672975,0.00015609585,6.311871e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012129551,0.0002607122,0.034838486,0.00047573086,0.00022938255,0.00026610043,0.83381504,0.000047059373,0.00024280447,0.022662906,0.0055962303,0.1003526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011713846,0.005294256,0.005262605,0.0017802622,0.000099533245,0.000060697035,0.6531918,0.00001277498,0.0031047445,0.0009827616,0.32870466,0.00033453482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002946177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023809085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32310843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021291747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016180152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122291241","doi":"","title":"Conflict resolution processes in end-of-life care disputes between families and healthcare providers in Canada.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Empathy; Health care; Legislature; Conflict resolution; Face (sociological concept); End-of-life care; Sociology; Public relations; Law; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Nursing; Palliative care; Social science; Medicine","score_opus":0.05180825918322724,"score_gpt":0.33128338459594103,"score_spread":0.2794751254127138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122291241","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9346131,0.03994546,0.000002121601,0.024713134,0.00018336296,0.0002686092,0.000044088138,0.000008433393,0.00022170713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823137,0.017255615,0.00009256845,0.00010434293,0.00017842127,0.000010294135,6.405367e-7,0.000008461724,0.000035943704],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977312,0.00025682777,0.00076029135,0.00018099381,0.0006725993,0.00039808446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99741656,0.00088839605,0.0005024567,0.00006160718,0.0009932856,0.00013767714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005038267,0.00017928645,0.0006930638,0.00012352988,0.00032728523,0.000029086106,0.00020335907,0.00006519932,0.0000021991161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003761558,0.00011064776,0.000047921472,0.0003817597,0.0006698843,0.0005678901,0.00010373533,0.00020216247,2.5662297e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006068632,0.000015163777,0.87628025,0.0003743209,0.00011437883,0.000022965534,0.11400316,0.000008357156,0.000025366715,0.00048182116,0.00045777266,0.008155785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010882214,0.00014984793,0.5927157,0.0010234991,0.00003703327,0.0000016310248,0.37836665,4.1237791e-7,0.000108482775,0.00010762736,0.02617454,0.00022633592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88066465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99290854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2835645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012532169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025057741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45120844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123409510","doi":"","title":"International Law from Below: Development, Social Movements and Third World Resistance","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":301,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Resistance (ecology); Law; Third world; Sociology; Political science; History; Economic history","score_opus":0.04254255933461592,"score_gpt":0.26093582823912065,"score_spread":0.21839326890450472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123409510","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23647659,0.006437354,0.00008403255,0.010686571,0.003044507,0.00010181097,0.00012102493,0.000044215023,0.7430039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9672669,0.000119428805,0.00055436237,0.0014509427,0.0012360979,0.0000024858348,0.0000048705424,0.000011260355,0.029353635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989951,0.000017552635,0.0004261031,0.000103268685,0.00031065915,0.00014726743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943775,0.000049793,0.00019496256,0.00003681449,0.00021800332,0.00006266112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010820692,0.0001209129,0.00026107486,0.000060255705,0.00047971786,0.00010882676,0.00014968414,0.000018800085,0.000051566956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026615166,0.000092446724,0.00006608822,0.000024698647,0.00030251985,0.0003611938,0.00007969714,0.00017685992,0.000008829017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009060285,0.000109775385,0.00018664151,0.000018778821,0.0005006578,0.00007604289,0.027256306,0.0000014915998,0.000014513749,0.96722466,0.0039248313,0.0005956921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061464566,0.000030395999,0.0006379689,0.00006649356,0.000021767817,0.0000012460046,0.0016511047,5.8854096e-7,0.000016366663,0.03725512,0.95958847,0.00011584723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019020493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064386763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9556636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016902329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045932396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3769868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125497815","doi":"","title":"Autonomous Weapons Systems: Taking the Human out of International Humanitarian Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Law, AI, and Intellectual Property","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International humanitarian law; Adversary; Geneva Conventions; Law; Political science; International law; Convention; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.05581112191346898,"score_gpt":0.29572824925084745,"score_spread":0.23991712733737847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125497815","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20063427,0.015643863,0.23885973,0.017826226,0.033447184,0.0008707932,0.000022931064,0.00028963608,0.49240538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99777484,0.0000744531,0.0004899475,0.000365602,0.00062499125,0.0000024154838,2.6743626e-7,0.000010021334,0.00065747235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827886,0.00018312765,0.0006897424,0.00015463443,0.00049552694,0.00019813103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99798965,0.00025645614,0.0007765325,0.00028650218,0.0006423374,0.000048506132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011470849,0.0001487598,0.0003881219,0.000091837195,0.00045574392,0.00023734682,0.0014377766,0.00003683488,0.000014793256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003448737,0.00008435186,0.00016094014,0.00009236001,0.00035113978,0.00060334214,0.00040021856,0.0002676365,0.000011225078],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021318627,0.00016017513,0.00033009838,0.000053693733,0.0009079563,0.000031287393,0.02128933,0.00048417907,0.0029693735,0.95880514,0.0121169435,0.0028304923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016984395,0.0022201121,0.002029466,0.0007309738,0.00019050992,0.00038335295,0.004351041,0.011328032,0.004009943,0.010420611,0.9619492,0.0006883121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022989677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022041137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94983226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000087159475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053423166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35052598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W639780213","doi":"","title":"Gaps, Issues, and Prospects: International Law and the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Maritime and Coastal Archaeology","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Cultural heritage; Expansive; United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; Law; Industrial heritage; Underwater; Cultural heritage management; Political science; Exclusive economic zone; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; History; Geography; Archaeology; Environmental science","score_opus":0.025426617982700198,"score_gpt":0.25906682536305015,"score_spread":0.23364020738034996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W639780213","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81851363,0.033174004,0.000022011733,0.06528238,0.0008200287,0.0004345541,0.000022853428,0.000024866067,0.08170564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99261314,0.0014822021,0.0001288699,0.0003656471,0.0006399435,0.0000044713674,4.6649825e-7,0.000004725222,0.004760526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994237,0.00004163513,0.0002561077,0.00006148042,0.00013688662,0.00008017815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953204,0.000031613632,0.00015900354,0.00003452134,0.00022530045,0.000017516591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021314085,0.00007824297,0.00020870329,0.000030764495,0.00019056776,0.00006066568,0.00007050143,0.00001443273,0.0000678935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024096502,0.00004014508,0.000042927768,0.000010309968,0.0011320057,0.00033431876,0.00012387747,0.00012874811,0.0000011104246],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044042058,0.00005992649,0.0001993069,0.00006861771,0.00048074158,0.000014226037,0.0747012,0.000004083058,0.00023459498,0.91801655,0.0011171126,0.004663242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019506811,0.00043461527,0.00027694282,0.00009402718,0.00007932912,0.00027229873,0.018977206,0.00003806597,0.0006657712,0.02379651,0.953293,0.00012150429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045169026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033695938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9521759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011853402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000056505123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4170922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6980579920","doi":"","title":"A Clean &amp; Healthy Environment: The Barriers &amp; Limitations of This Emerging Human Right","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Order (exchange); Right to health; Right to development; Sustainable development; International law; Right to know","score_opus":0.058365009755273596,"score_gpt":0.32752851257074017,"score_spread":0.2691635028154666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6980579920","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9563728,0.0056211906,0.010985943,0.008918644,0.00007930126,0.00024469726,0.000044451135,0.000066040484,0.017666927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9701407,0.012185881,0.014878099,0.00023745293,0.0002238214,0.000035296714,0.0000060468797,0.00003138971,0.0022612945],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871707,0.000027768318,0.000639481,0.00013383274,0.00027415284,0.00020769912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985809,0.00018047939,0.0007024426,0.00030793322,0.00013561803,0.00009267589],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003008902,0.00015273798,0.00030428983,0.00006036157,0.0006548453,0.000018847177,0.0003159668,0.00004967512,0.00023944475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015184228,0.000107513966,0.00016905983,0.0001290805,0.00025500017,0.00014002682,0.00010210616,0.00039526337,0.000008068296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012480913,0.0020587235,0.025802288,0.0008054996,0.005584806,0.00014865532,0.06412629,0.007115666,0.5488168,0.1306986,0.14145914,0.07213546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003743456,0.00006904732,0.000117481235,0.00007769007,0.000107956184,0.0000857317,0.0019623488,0.000006121947,0.0072237826,0.008427737,0.981383,0.00016475767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000028196331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000812092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83992386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010151069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035108864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5036607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6986838370","doi":"","title":"Reciprocity: Fair Trade of Free Trade? Challenging American Electricity Regulation under NAFTA","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Subpoena; Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Limiting; Diafiltration","score_opus":0.030915076630790097,"score_gpt":0.30592710728448175,"score_spread":0.2750120306536917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6986838370","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82509905,0.0049229544,0.001686746,0.15765199,0.0005938808,0.00022804954,0.000044982047,0.00004087375,0.009731453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965961,0.0014534272,0.00019645668,0.00081838213,0.00066411233,0.0000012040684,1.9408733e-7,0.0000109355815,0.00025919155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831516,0.0002100367,0.0004458216,0.00012288323,0.0005934738,0.00031264854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985302,0.0003177616,0.00079382624,0.00013423218,0.000098244884,0.00012571539],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009893755,0.00012042297,0.00045361262,0.00012705634,0.00036909778,0.00002941023,0.00031725425,0.00005075777,0.000006285012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010545707,0.00010873408,0.00015591487,0.00047016234,0.00047336932,0.00031021523,0.000029162633,0.00024750715,6.4864724e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044473785,0.00045017232,0.006707367,0.00021450491,0.0016883,0.00004828875,0.12429467,0.0016893445,0.0030609723,0.5076557,0.1967976,0.15694836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015702748,0.0010010899,0.27516368,0.0002940126,0.00022213056,0.00003943873,0.01420321,0.00014912781,0.0015094931,0.03126622,0.6739958,0.00058552943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009713296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03197341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4771982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024819397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017445507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7015476593","doi":"","title":"Stepping Forward or Stumbling Back? Command Responsibility for Failure to Act, Civilan Superiors and the International Criminal Court","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Statute; Status quo; International law; Jurisprudence; Customary international law; Relation (database); Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court; Criminal court","score_opus":0.07662652004601067,"score_gpt":0.36372510840756384,"score_spread":0.28709858836155316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7015476593","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9761965,0.00029205615,0.00027655475,0.01878631,0.0007959578,0.00033891553,0.000018893987,0.000010266044,0.0032845393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99325746,0.0002051849,0.00135099,0.0006737373,0.0008901029,0.000009176554,8.787019e-7,0.000009548793,0.0036029217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983419,0.00015930778,0.00046831538,0.00014877981,0.00065722683,0.00022443461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974566,0.0011164929,0.00023924763,0.000082756036,0.0010032183,0.00010169895],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020964975,0.00012886213,0.00035989785,0.00011839746,0.0014613066,0.00016221464,0.0004172808,0.000035460802,0.000056176712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011881227,0.00007343436,0.00014624596,0.000062854204,0.0006633223,0.00040879517,0.00011458695,0.00019764717,0.0000034723519],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010276192,0.00018068044,0.0056207147,0.00007706353,0.0014253467,0.0002127243,0.17910765,0.000087062544,0.00013240521,0.77281755,0.029510684,0.0005519339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0054826513,0.0007610093,0.010022754,0.00031633925,0.0002422634,0.00038959293,0.033715248,0.000063545085,0.00017301591,0.020876722,0.9275541,0.000402811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000212934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009731231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89804333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015956191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028116672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7033629983","doi":"","title":"Reconstructing Identity: A Personal Pespective","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Education and Vocational Training","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Dilemma; Categorical variable; Expression (computer science); Personal identity; Trajectory","score_opus":0.18226656833792212,"score_gpt":0.4191736926386618,"score_spread":0.23690712430073965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7033629983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82603407,0.009080661,0.00014282746,0.03830953,0.0033349707,0.00010968541,0.0000034848367,0.000041571457,0.12294319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99363416,0.0015936464,0.0011164563,0.00026873648,0.0012178116,0.0000015012334,9.0739675e-8,0.000005762517,0.0021618346],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885625,0.00012725881,0.00029138505,0.000082224586,0.00047917463,0.000163736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986292,0.00031321406,0.00032018695,0.00003271394,0.0006233103,0.00008138308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010480377,0.00006926013,0.00018299777,0.00011604069,0.0007086823,0.00010305152,0.00014542133,0.000023492432,0.0003366569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012018288,0.00006209266,0.000103076425,0.0002711547,0.0002991938,0.0008391274,0.00002125416,0.00020788681,0.000021476835],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020945106,0.00019990242,0.047423393,0.000025333327,0.0006692423,0.000072716044,0.71534467,0.000007658104,0.000066757406,0.19253625,0.022604212,0.021028906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005649492,0.00011742524,0.0047651734,0.00016712814,0.00008167275,0.00022957168,0.8198329,0.000049426573,0.000024904055,0.0076712943,0.16626677,0.00022878023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008795723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032511973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18486495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001571499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012190505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54506826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7052194617","doi":"","title":"Putting the Ivy Out of the Windows: Presumptions of Privacy in the Home and R. v. Gomboc","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Magnetic confinement fusion research","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Subpoena; Government (linguistics); Pretext; Circumstantial evidence; Law enforcement","score_opus":0.025298976996639664,"score_gpt":0.30608873881855775,"score_spread":0.28078976182191806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7052194617","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98344296,0.0005054933,0.000010951785,0.010233025,0.0001905706,0.00024329938,0.00000933614,0.0000010041365,0.0053633843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992419,0.00006121812,0.00010975167,0.000029322016,0.00015499114,0.0000068674312,1.4718196e-7,0.0000040090927,0.00039180202],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886507,0.00012444913,0.00042424706,0.00006661886,0.00038445453,0.00013515133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871457,0.00046921917,0.00036785705,0.00022362563,0.00020474095,0.000019995956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010104051,0.000084025545,0.00021679426,0.00004769838,0.00016561321,0.00003450465,0.00047310977,0.000014201168,0.00041559484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001412704,0.00003577672,0.00009955788,0.00013671487,0.00029722718,0.00003884786,0.00031202845,0.00046659142,5.742062e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009038776,0.00075596094,0.6837199,0.00016697141,0.0008486414,0.000007712498,0.046503913,0.00005578076,0.049725667,0.020723505,0.016471151,0.18093044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012024108,0.00018712577,0.911137,0.00015564961,0.0001125525,0.000007823506,0.013592623,0.00005391886,0.0012584,0.0027199686,0.06947899,0.00009355498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022211258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033230562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22741713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000024362619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006504569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45504722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7093486469","doi":"","title":"Lesbian Mothers &amp; Gay Fathers: Overt and Subconscious Homophobic Biases Concerning Parental Fitness","year":2010,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subconscious; Presumption; Lesbian; Adversarial system; Homosexuality; Morality; Human sexuality; Freudian slip","score_opus":0.06043260952179957,"score_gpt":0.3416900156408338,"score_spread":0.2812574061190342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7093486469","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9172504,0.06906838,0.000032542957,0.0019027297,0.00836603,0.00033907135,0.00005748641,0.00005595373,0.0029274158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97295433,0.023301842,0.00029480245,0.00036921885,0.0018066379,0.000007675607,0.0000022636498,0.00008018492,0.0011830542],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945485,0.0009315627,0.0015740929,0.0006662508,0.0012211829,0.0010584091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99403745,0.0016921272,0.0022017604,0.00044242278,0.0009990131,0.00062721386],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030454297,0.0007434537,0.0016726936,0.00039917315,0.0026315781,0.00038011427,0.0010041856,0.00048405683,0.00029487346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035076835,0.0006658674,0.00055402005,0.0005633396,0.00814188,0.0010137612,0.0003511381,0.001958329,0.00004882328],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014023507,0.0012890995,0.23061846,0.00038868032,0.0045220675,0.0014159405,0.6354564,0.0002638259,0.011606454,0.003969856,0.09896861,0.010098266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0055044047,0.0017730308,0.03168096,0.0015219427,0.0017870556,0.0019318912,0.317473,0.000048482187,0.00049581716,0.00393021,0.63134927,0.002503919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00654172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028037671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53238064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005248965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008780162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W845405134","doi":"","title":"Principle and Imagination in Judging: A Conversation with Mr. Justice James MacPherson","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Economic Justice; Scrutiny; Sociology; Skepticism; Conversation; Appeal; Premise; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.018159643009412228,"score_gpt":0.3139202530030376,"score_spread":0.29576060999362536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W845405134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.972888,0.0068136356,0.00006896917,0.011744704,0.00024689524,0.00012260399,0.0000016520376,0.000016668293,0.008096867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966107,0.0014629709,0.0007181321,0.00015826168,0.00029271058,0.0000020025143,5.341632e-7,0.0000047733974,0.00074992055],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915904,0.00008321373,0.00019306755,0.00008122246,0.0003416536,0.0001417933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933267,0.00008165255,0.00022551097,0.000029959943,0.00029966058,0.0000305392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006015465,0.00007459827,0.00016674309,0.000017668472,0.0002988957,0.00007391881,0.000069697686,0.000042646247,0.000006184253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000118886404,0.000053917614,0.000031866908,0.0001975242,0.00030132316,0.00052610243,0.000017621951,0.00015807424,7.5209965e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037601532,0.00041649284,0.21717857,0.00033276674,0.00042740995,0.00028658248,0.58537704,0.00095842604,0.0008390127,0.16049385,0.028331213,0.004982651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034991559,0.00036956917,0.08379195,0.00039282805,0.00046703996,0.000072018614,0.50600684,0.000103539634,0.00041212604,0.0074638445,0.39695472,0.0004663878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005614288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002086119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3686235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013228775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007722148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22988942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W897471759","doi":"","title":"HIV and Shared Responsibility: A Critical Evaluation of Mabior and DC","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Autonomy; Harm; Obligation; Law; Criminal law; Supreme court; Sexual assault; Political science; Criminology; Confidentiality; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Sociology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.07367276692934686,"score_gpt":0.4010684395194092,"score_spread":0.3273956725900623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W897471759","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9896087,0.005873067,0.000028867558,0.0036598316,0.00013243366,0.000087323315,0.000003098251,0.000004091231,0.0006026016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99835664,0.0010007332,0.00036944673,0.00004631772,0.000114927774,0.000004420296,1.3661233e-7,0.000003033182,0.00010436266],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998621,0.00030699867,0.00032477127,0.00009607933,0.0005352017,0.00011595471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974974,0.00053519686,0.00015082698,0.000061441504,0.0016794316,0.00007572447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021273105,0.00006420793,0.000252941,0.0001245581,0.0002948423,0.00007890771,0.000061616294,0.00003370756,0.000090286056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004540904,0.000050030554,0.000062163264,0.00018817505,0.00045235662,0.00041598882,0.00004690831,0.00009687822,0.0000021838857],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007957356,0.00090832106,0.077843964,0.0005404609,0.002068406,0.000054218202,0.44644672,0.000075721466,0.007815783,0.011200634,0.014601689,0.43764836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069098565,0.00038834335,0.07111846,0.00017871991,0.0027101627,0.000038344024,0.91655713,0.00041655268,0.0001396842,0.004278761,0.0033053008,0.00017754438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013203286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020518808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47011042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056789504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012555886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5436214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}