{"meta":{"query_hash":"b4007ccb13d4","filters":{"venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies"},"cohort_total":95,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":95,"exported":95,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/b4007ccb13d4","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Dalhousie+journal+of+legal+studies"},"results":[{"id":"W1749212531","doi":"","title":"Stories of 0s: Transgender Women, Monstrous Bodies, and the Canadian Prison System","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Transgender; Jurisprudence; Law; Sociology; Criminology; Context (archaeology); Political science; Criminal law; Gender studies; History","score_opus":0.029952102075931845,"score_gpt":0.29853962858674,"score_spread":0.26858752651080814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1749212531","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6237186,0.014370419,0.001055142,0.16659757,0.0017097289,0.00009908395,0.000510614,0.00010701561,0.19183184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.970177,0.0034815806,0.0002648084,0.007915009,0.00011720537,0.000027689406,0.00006080192,0.000050095925,0.01790591],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939632,0.0019857336,0.000074757074,0.00035223877,0.0012544575,0.0023696506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996114,0.0010163985,0.00026559667,0.00012720336,0.00096249126,0.0015142683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032363278,0.001098741,0.00064040977,0.0025784308,0.072662115,0.011368723,0.0036894719,0.0051259706,0.005171655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007048577,0.0006750295,0.0005493642,0.002805524,0.045957156,0.0057243514,0.0092195915,0.008587572,0.000387051],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003194277,0.000015254286,0.0023175175,0.0000588313,0.00000738312,0.0013182546,0.9375557,0.00007587576,0.00020527936,0.028630575,0.023740863,0.006042424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038608437,0.000015339454,0.0028347399,0.00016450154,0.000012956433,0.00042088825,0.87413466,0.000077776866,0.00010953234,0.0016494131,0.12052213,0.000054133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98051924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99084735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12072213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12072213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07400392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87590444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1767010817","doi":"","title":"'The Melancholy Truth': Corrective and Equitable Justice for Omar Khadr","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Harm; Law; Constructive trust; Sociology; Appeal; Order (exchange); Proposition; Government (linguistics); Principal (computer security); Faith; Repatriation; Law and economics; Remedial education; Political science; Economics; Philosophy; History; Theology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.056058050570153686,"score_gpt":0.38319732613740065,"score_spread":0.327139275567247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1767010817","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13496618,0.014060917,0.004083205,0.61622643,0.0024553624,0.00014091926,0.00008925116,0.00009243342,0.22788528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9399727,0.0015395795,0.0018356608,0.041983787,0.00034575321,0.00001793914,0.000012044367,0.000020188956,0.014272417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914186,0.0027066316,0.00035869627,0.00062431593,0.0026115899,0.0022801775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99460346,0.0023901209,0.00057281554,0.00041474894,0.0014147566,0.0006041083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010126706,0.00027569017,0.0005377836,0.0008325462,0.02481911,0.011220312,0.0013771357,0.010541791,0.0034334688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014436667,0.0003135686,0.00032499927,0.0006291386,0.026293987,0.0039971387,0.0051925397,0.011131841,0.0003660889],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005178536,0.00005501609,0.0018497749,0.00011918716,0.000020217489,0.0010424888,0.024122484,0.0002864867,0.0006669508,0.9198889,0.033237517,0.018659014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009110674,0.0001298333,0.011712924,0.00094128953,0.00010808489,0.001509425,0.0946144,0.0011172734,0.0027739312,0.34712568,0.53956944,0.00030663444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25284246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41936314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7471576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017899549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031972386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50274146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1798632713","doi":"","title":"Cost of Admission: One Rubber Stamp - Evaluating the Significance of Investigative Necessity in Wiretap Authorizations after R v Araujo","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Supreme court; Law; Authorization; Legislature; Political science; Judicial deference; Computer security; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.20227030998609552,"score_gpt":0.424135452960932,"score_spread":0.2218651429748365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1798632713","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21645086,0.0044975015,0.016933067,0.18683109,0.0023133974,0.0005409593,0.00029462596,0.0002784333,0.5718601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93836963,0.0012063521,0.004930883,0.022367474,0.00091820734,0.0002159212,0.000069122696,0.000097997625,0.031824343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9436569,0.01584116,0.0026497392,0.0043696603,0.025364483,0.008118005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8758026,0.08831428,0.0071412097,0.007923206,0.015268745,0.0055499445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031313732,0.0005079427,0.0007921756,0.0031987515,0.0074396245,0.015801912,0.0044283634,0.014106126,0.011547293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13317347,0.00077725196,0.0013348178,0.0019331889,0.016001683,0.010341789,0.008109157,0.0153189665,0.0012798175],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016629994,0.00009478015,0.0070159268,0.00014375751,0.000026609436,0.0013599199,0.0033958254,0.00048619226,0.0008733456,0.94087446,0.02188553,0.023677401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038985294,0.0014412069,0.04343103,0.0041015777,0.00060159626,0.0055194604,0.028347813,0.00823576,0.008017497,0.41555852,0.48355925,0.00079639634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028865986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051134642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031313732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011404122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028831625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16560483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1834797527","doi":"","title":"A Case Study on the Legal Impacts of Corporate Sustainability Pledges in the Alberta Oil Sands","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Oil sands; Sustainability; Business; Natural resource economics; Economics; Geography; Asphalt","score_opus":0.074646981191422,"score_gpt":0.33936716133451783,"score_spread":0.26472018014309584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1834797527","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7201003,0.0015969714,0.0030716097,0.018200053,0.00014862182,0.00031340565,0.00015011698,0.000047545178,0.25637138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96518755,0.0009830322,0.001769409,0.002272857,0.000042756878,0.00005348286,0.000060898685,0.000010924043,0.029618995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99299604,0.00206996,0.00012560858,0.00034934605,0.002243319,0.0022157577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944753,0.0031199756,0.0003429199,0.00020997516,0.00093872094,0.0009130992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004876623,0.0004892423,0.00032875285,0.0016715722,0.025051465,0.004933367,0.0029256286,0.0077038812,0.004399584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006436937,0.00045910693,0.0005706798,0.001990601,0.00740431,0.0017808006,0.0030760702,0.0054367273,0.00025606842],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003205857,0.0017416957,0.058343243,0.00029717427,0.00008975195,0.09022843,0.09933978,0.01307255,0.0044621946,0.62635523,0.053878862,0.05187054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027390115,0.0006395413,0.061693836,0.00092761073,0.00027982568,0.014739396,0.4514154,0.021339986,0.0071062753,0.026179051,0.4150144,0.00039077524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8226174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9413598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17738259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0465071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037186243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35685444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1847878306","doi":"","title":"A Canadian Solution: Recent Developments in the Law of Directors’ Duties in the Context of Financially Distressed Corporations","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Creditor; Insolvency; Duty; Corporation; Law; Context (archaeology); Companies Act; Shareholder; Corporate law; Commonwealth; Business; Business judgment rule; Supreme court; Accounting; Corporate governance; Political science; Finance; Debt","score_opus":0.05785189667741133,"score_gpt":0.330934282237167,"score_spread":0.27308238555975567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1847878306","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0115181375,0.110393025,0.0024184426,0.65728533,0.0049497476,0.000040551862,0.0003327589,0.00006128494,0.21300074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46580082,0.19480439,0.010084546,0.20636056,0.006920061,0.00007559394,0.00038889764,0.00013640964,0.1154288],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914302,0.0012987528,0.00031531267,0.001113716,0.0042781527,0.0015638589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98235184,0.0045214836,0.00089735823,0.00061494927,0.008941314,0.0026729328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008143078,0.00046811005,0.00062638073,0.0034333612,0.016574575,0.012311815,0.0029356857,0.009956788,0.008586785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02076424,0.0006108912,0.000726571,0.0059407116,0.020644639,0.007752165,0.0036566972,0.012060737,0.0006163803],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023111608,0.000023638439,0.0011439123,0.0001561825,0.000010665791,0.00037224215,0.0037115302,0.0003583423,0.00020686717,0.8354143,0.12407082,0.03450842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021810352,0.000016346825,0.0060037076,0.000527273,0.000024496328,0.00022444938,0.0030958555,0.00051406503,0.00019297701,0.057612844,0.9316403,0.0001258281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97157794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9811902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13348976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13348976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1690767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9685405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1848878169","doi":"","title":"Canada’s Fresh Water and NAFTA: Clearing the Muddied Waters","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Tribunal; Context (archaeology); Sovereignty; Law; International trade law; Government (linguistics); Position (finance); International trade; International law; Clearing; Water trading; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Water resources; History; Politics; Ecology; Finance","score_opus":0.016861709815122656,"score_gpt":0.2602034572963276,"score_spread":0.24334174748120493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1848878169","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10036568,0.027106406,0.0025555426,0.37767,0.0014045804,0.00007500205,0.00047417838,0.00010742483,0.49024117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81009114,0.014813252,0.0033608205,0.056184344,0.00019929631,0.000048427624,0.00020809134,0.000053439882,0.115041085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970931,0.00030050706,0.000055352277,0.00025642494,0.0013984796,0.0008961931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982362,0.00046297497,0.000101732956,0.00005703638,0.0008187506,0.00032336338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001616109,0.00020449657,0.00027527518,0.0011471978,0.021393975,0.009743412,0.0013848863,0.0042150496,0.0043028756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044056373,0.00024335209,0.00028882225,0.002033067,0.012063072,0.0028645357,0.0025737493,0.0038643032,0.00021584403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024337825,0.000013581069,0.003343864,0.00012000354,0.000016571303,0.00068247324,0.01872491,0.0004939974,0.00045425794,0.85429466,0.09075343,0.031078001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011808495,0.000011691564,0.004999305,0.0003079082,0.000025615633,0.00011243932,0.020010604,0.00036668632,0.00045582504,0.029426882,0.94421285,0.000058315894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99019593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9954413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.084103286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.084103286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18086062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61021495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1853419240","doi":"","title":"A New Conception of Wilful Blindness: The Supreme Court of Canada's Decision in R. v. Sansregret","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mens rea; Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Blindness; Focus (optics); Sociology; Political science; Criminal law; Criminology; Medicine","score_opus":0.04023229177587528,"score_gpt":0.33328394300831143,"score_spread":0.29305165123243615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1853419240","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11996753,0.010577581,0.020189583,0.17871289,0.0011696601,0.00017212715,0.0002920984,0.000113260736,0.6688053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9602961,0.001394679,0.0026994715,0.01077284,0.00019133423,0.000029195733,0.000029150357,0.000025488393,0.024561744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927545,0.0013564382,0.00014698287,0.00064874336,0.0031338227,0.0019594894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99686,0.0011019458,0.00014393247,0.00021010944,0.0012234562,0.00046063305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054308516,0.00044945595,0.00058750884,0.0025720594,0.014764224,0.013089731,0.002465486,0.0070489775,0.002809568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010874919,0.000382449,0.0005994467,0.0017857943,0.041673984,0.0056074355,0.004324128,0.008394052,0.00014891713],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008603437,0.0000043648606,0.00033928358,0.000010274738,0.000003968706,0.00013920778,0.0029247408,0.00031636428,0.000071021765,0.9895517,0.003332408,0.0032980726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035026846,0.000025071262,0.0030511362,0.00023591511,0.000033002038,0.00021502246,0.006992254,0.0021433018,0.00043658284,0.82898164,0.15771943,0.00013151947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93631667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.959418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08605994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08605994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11103554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6244115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1910688488","doi":"","title":"A Dangerous Step Backwards: The Implications of Conditional Permanent Resident Status for Sponsored Immigrant Women in Abusive Relationships","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Context (archaeology); Domestic violence; Government (linguistics); Residence; Immigration law; Law; Political science; Criminology; Jurisprudence; Institution; Sociology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Geography","score_opus":0.07167891146118106,"score_gpt":0.35851966959434095,"score_spread":0.2868407581331599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1910688488","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77329874,0.0029804248,0.00022991294,0.1699462,0.00029440603,0.000035985566,0.0000625458,0.000006783499,0.053144973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.983668,0.0024365766,0.0001271295,0.010050128,0.00008513049,0.000017648003,0.000016872347,0.0000058622513,0.0035925733],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99733883,0.0012699016,0.00005742887,0.00012823338,0.0002587067,0.000946913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953164,0.0022419116,0.00075841584,0.00015124166,0.00047528686,0.0010566845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029401095,0.00019044873,0.00021235601,0.00068967993,0.01629494,0.0044130995,0.0014024763,0.0032597776,0.004701883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009860833,0.0002036513,0.00048997597,0.00091342966,0.011840416,0.002990606,0.0043652225,0.003855217,0.000228435],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014013221,0.00020473856,0.16317138,0.00019983812,0.000041116364,0.008258742,0.5900465,0.00025059245,0.00060062803,0.14534198,0.023530848,0.06821349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009741496,0.00007459373,0.07897054,0.0007143894,0.00004347774,0.0011327298,0.8829348,0.0001484634,0.00019961441,0.00958342,0.026140159,0.000048096153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4078829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6682995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5921171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010626712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02023228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8110175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1916515311","doi":"","title":"Balancing Privacy and the Open Court Principle of Family Law: Does De-Identifying Case Law Protect Anonymity?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Anonymity; Transparency (behavior); Law; Context (archaeology); Privacy laws of the United States; Privacy law; Internet privacy; Common law; Political science; Expectation of privacy; Right to know; Right to privacy; Sociology; Information privacy; Business; Supreme court; Privacy policy; Computer science","score_opus":0.04861317570297575,"score_gpt":0.3553008274656192,"score_spread":0.30668765176264345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1916515311","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.087964274,0.011532738,0.11016312,0.41967717,0.0013227968,0.00014302514,0.00012645732,0.00007515234,0.36899534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95116127,0.003930033,0.009156172,0.025036264,0.0014344528,0.00015163359,0.00003529551,0.000042452713,0.009052435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96781284,0.020062309,0.0009620589,0.0024561856,0.005609559,0.0030969856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.957155,0.033214647,0.003000775,0.0039400924,0.0016414734,0.0010479753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029700095,0.00036069166,0.0008483491,0.0016974944,0.0080901515,0.012644961,0.0022381095,0.009273281,0.0037927546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0571896,0.0004409014,0.0009520439,0.0015581257,0.052498233,0.024561364,0.009746565,0.007933635,0.0005397075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009697089,0.000016245189,0.000498416,0.000021165284,0.0000074353557,0.00014784609,0.003773991,0.00014193889,0.000051510746,0.98637146,0.0013842151,0.007576068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015370577,0.000020935606,0.0005699016,0.0002242622,0.00001576249,0.0003152805,0.0027013908,0.00031576073,0.00022525506,0.9608089,0.03476501,0.000022074819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054292423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037175084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029700095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005356638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008584224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.157071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1945093393","doi":"","title":"A Queer Critique on the Polygamy Debate in Canada: Law, Culture, and Diversity","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Marriage and Sexual Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Polygyny; Supreme court; Law; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Government (linguistics); Diversity (politics); Political science; Population; History","score_opus":0.06875747520976568,"score_gpt":0.32480819141815737,"score_spread":0.2560507162083917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1945093393","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02944124,0.030505128,0.0016095378,0.6885767,0.0016121647,0.000043469747,0.00032505477,0.00004640243,0.24784036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7018653,0.023720706,0.0016212928,0.1913435,0.0016821455,0.000080180056,0.00015388413,0.000104721126,0.07942817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99480176,0.0008625365,0.00009170994,0.00057614216,0.0018459033,0.0018220176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938226,0.0022916324,0.00024458393,0.00020087197,0.0022869187,0.0011534836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042491606,0.0006069133,0.0008032638,0.0030241911,0.045785908,0.0125164045,0.0042244606,0.008656327,0.0065091555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008908482,0.00041846404,0.00062201824,0.005326983,0.045163352,0.0044211564,0.0040424545,0.013149377,0.00033648108],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002025591,0.00001338137,0.001736738,0.000056236542,0.000012318705,0.00033246994,0.025400005,0.00022526257,0.000083134735,0.87850344,0.07930425,0.014312486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060708076,0.000019732817,0.01387063,0.0011141852,0.00006263886,0.0002898898,0.045239724,0.00092112424,0.00023868617,0.18163341,0.75638515,0.0001641283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.995421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9955909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14462587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14462587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18891582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99211276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099982348","doi":"","title":"Does The Charter Follow the Flag? Revisiting Constitutional Extraterritoriality after R v Hape","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Extraterritoriality; Law; Political science; Charter; Comity; International law; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Jurisdiction","score_opus":0.021777002743249622,"score_gpt":0.3187983158087409,"score_spread":0.2970213130654913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099982348","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029601185,0.009002583,0.016628502,0.4518792,0.008872374,0.00016653727,0.00028817312,0.00022245663,0.48333892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6552511,0.003713232,0.004648548,0.22025359,0.0033757347,0.00015002779,0.000119319426,0.00033333624,0.11215515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98721063,0.0027634758,0.0004132037,0.002424814,0.0035071804,0.0036807128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98662055,0.006605552,0.00039708125,0.001460873,0.0039010262,0.001014891],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013645747,0.00044549035,0.0007880834,0.00096709834,0.016773714,0.015719904,0.0031060525,0.01730899,0.00577975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036385242,0.00071026414,0.0006581239,0.0013526563,0.03823785,0.011721279,0.0050149644,0.02871314,0.00078411435],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006782945,0.0000054811276,0.0001442742,0.00001889384,0.0000028154248,0.000098221644,0.0022090874,0.00011357112,0.00005512342,0.9713199,0.022777658,0.0032483146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037471607,0.000038205566,0.00088827254,0.00038512802,0.000027029377,0.00011385057,0.004315381,0.00076723035,0.0006956749,0.30345666,0.6891046,0.00017051092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6399537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70394707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36004633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035431143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051111035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7243334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112363706","doi":"","title":"Reciprocity: Fair Trade or Free Trade? Challenging American Electricity Regulation under NAFTA","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Restructuring; Commission; Order (exchange); Obligation; Economics; International trade; Government (linguistics); International trade law; Free trade; Business; Law; Law and economics; Finance; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04118949210264184,"score_gpt":0.3213496314512242,"score_spread":0.28016013934858236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112363706","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0870004,0.0039084745,0.0140295625,0.2838241,0.0012092298,0.00012717687,0.0001220571,0.0001033995,0.60967565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.911961,0.002177588,0.004579601,0.042520218,0.0005435193,0.00010643818,0.000050627972,0.00004989628,0.038010985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9780507,0.005957278,0.00061818,0.0026580733,0.007934462,0.004781266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837949,0.0077008386,0.0008275649,0.0013665054,0.0053824848,0.00092774484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022860857,0.00028207872,0.0006291398,0.00085253007,0.013035605,0.013549524,0.0023203557,0.01167112,0.003537802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030924717,0.0003961875,0.00074797345,0.0008802816,0.022040358,0.0057325643,0.0037861606,0.010820414,0.00047877437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007979106,0.00000922246,0.0003904317,0.000013746617,0.0000045819415,0.00008825352,0.0020665303,0.00025379242,0.00013179728,0.9854655,0.007223259,0.0043447944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006201123,0.000042780997,0.0025430839,0.0004122293,0.00006604689,0.00017637227,0.007091817,0.0026321455,0.00084367814,0.5667022,0.41928846,0.00013919422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6311385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6784757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9670021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03299789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09568864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7420676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112539498","doi":"","title":"Calculating Judgment Interest After Bank of America Canada v. Mutual Trust Co.: Difficulties Compounded","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Restitution; Law; Context (archaeology); Jurisdiction; Creditor; Unjust enrichment; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Debt","score_opus":0.04295107980467761,"score_gpt":0.3259100329100433,"score_spread":0.2829589531053657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112539498","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27188691,0.0031900557,0.016501425,0.038026977,0.0011967194,0.00069900247,0.0015358247,0.0002226214,0.6667405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87377965,0.000755155,0.00420438,0.0072189323,0.00024147554,0.00012713125,0.0003034586,0.00006516455,0.1133047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98301333,0.0014168294,0.0006849207,0.0021247356,0.0081431065,0.0046170456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909657,0.003271478,0.00047759415,0.00054640137,0.003956713,0.0007820511],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007899503,0.00058583554,0.0008014304,0.0021599177,0.011651616,0.012042325,0.002542777,0.010411399,0.0065572876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02299842,0.0008473207,0.00080279313,0.0024189234,0.0057240394,0.0053173625,0.0035067364,0.009320649,0.00080750353],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016153207,0.00007015325,0.009669656,0.00008040018,0.0000622378,0.00290154,0.009954644,0.0010404825,0.0014668825,0.89318436,0.05315786,0.028250173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018155707,0.0005745388,0.050505344,0.00054737745,0.00042796115,0.0018755341,0.015893072,0.008675641,0.013932567,0.24519266,0.6614469,0.00074688054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6684797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8398917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33152032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041583918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043425094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6669454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112600016","doi":"","title":"Child Support and Shared Parenting in Canada: A \"Reality Cheque\"","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Child support; Family law; Publishing; Law; Family court; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Jurisprudence; Economic Justice; Set (abstract data type); Section (typography); Cheque; Law reform; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.04553248621422363,"score_gpt":0.3132534242809266,"score_spread":0.267720938066703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112600016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5535023,0.038350128,0.0011649235,0.27221313,0.0007645648,0.00008722756,0.0004497322,0.000048921174,0.13341913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9733604,0.008673902,0.00059399765,0.0099123,0.00007924358,0.000021953583,0.00006906385,0.000014054742,0.007275043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937588,0.0009062109,0.00015402824,0.00050250534,0.0020554094,0.0026231387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99252456,0.0019075486,0.00073105335,0.0002633739,0.0020096167,0.0025637716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030479655,0.0002485138,0.0005156713,0.0013865683,0.029688725,0.0072560464,0.0033723405,0.0038313002,0.003917467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011543989,0.0003764979,0.0003700755,0.003302681,0.013160667,0.002577575,0.006712776,0.006067239,0.0001267739],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013553641,0.000175647,0.07222717,0.00056107185,0.00010225773,0.00625692,0.20079212,0.0013699317,0.00078236894,0.47550914,0.06640336,0.1756845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007357381,0.000109995584,0.18966742,0.0022391332,0.00017566077,0.0021599,0.38351968,0.0017071198,0.0008768882,0.041561123,0.37755772,0.00035174144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9966462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14870779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14870779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30131227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9873783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116816638","doi":"","title":"Grassroots Capitalism or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying About Financial Risk in the Exempt Market and Love Equity Crowdfunding","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Equity crowdfunding; Seed money; Grassroots; Prospectus; Business; Equity (law); Finance; Economics; Market economy; Law","score_opus":0.042212727407663464,"score_gpt":0.29591915289719645,"score_spread":0.253706425489533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116816638","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011908007,0.0076238685,0.00719965,0.7424896,0.0034442518,0.00006837903,0.000081043036,0.00015336572,0.2270318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.449166,0.009153292,0.008903211,0.2387315,0.0023683708,0.00009907784,0.00008068842,0.00028018578,0.29121765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961932,0.001071764,0.00008829249,0.00048595617,0.0012725497,0.0008882418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943304,0.0016070695,0.00034238226,0.00067968096,0.0013183147,0.0017222178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065478915,0.00034914125,0.00033180078,0.0006834483,0.010954658,0.012320237,0.001420311,0.0059722313,0.013043405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01198602,0.00023394704,0.00041017897,0.00043642797,0.032692656,0.012291145,0.004939656,0.009056008,0.0027611903],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029173978,0.000046405374,0.0013266023,0.00010117438,0.000009655872,0.0003542942,0.013197409,0.00018003702,0.0004331855,0.6769119,0.25370854,0.05370157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001464763,0.000028233024,0.000676464,0.00028680518,0.0000069400853,0.00016081378,0.0068652006,0.00024630132,0.00034673142,0.11965726,0.87167954,0.000031095984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12943697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19816698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12943697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015889322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019791083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25736713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130130495","doi":"","title":"All Convictions Are Not the Same: Rethinking CUPE’s Abuse of Process Doctrine in Cases Involving Plea Bargains","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Plea; Rebuttal; Law; Doctrine; Political science; Supreme court; Warrant; Innocence; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.10482562282533785,"score_gpt":0.3827937724761825,"score_spread":0.27796814965084465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130130495","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22107968,0.007261956,0.05861045,0.2528561,0.002879603,0.00053378794,0.00012714695,0.0001836654,0.45646754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9307727,0.0018332754,0.010144527,0.045535587,0.00084235775,0.0001600333,0.0000399899,0.00007972153,0.010591758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94810563,0.016922591,0.0026134318,0.0063511687,0.017971637,0.008035531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9228879,0.05849567,0.0029566435,0.0062434934,0.0074499124,0.0019664392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.065465964,0.00067287846,0.001262835,0.003343792,0.021410195,0.020611135,0.0062557585,0.025187198,0.0019390575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10133666,0.0013785772,0.001927829,0.0026744849,0.05328728,0.018625515,0.014165167,0.036512163,0.0004148293],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044637774,0.000042034844,0.0025364838,0.00005062065,0.000023877776,0.003633034,0.022201844,0.00046463398,0.00040557256,0.9471744,0.008775135,0.014647783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025262203,0.00017987197,0.013588621,0.0024265076,0.00040112878,0.006677353,0.0413721,0.010870742,0.0039274073,0.5966344,0.32309222,0.0005770157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19221245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30907133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80778754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02288357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03698298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3821873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133624854","doi":"","title":"Clarifying the Role of Precedent and the Doctrine of Stare Decisis in Trial and Intermediate Appellate Level Charter Analysis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Doctrine; Supreme court; Appeal; Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Context (archaeology); Sociology; History","score_opus":0.03883818339344456,"score_gpt":0.33207330233573684,"score_spread":0.29323511894229226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133624854","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17366943,0.005354905,0.1924624,0.060376555,0.00085197703,0.00038695364,0.00027070494,0.00012643321,0.56650066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96638227,0.0009244735,0.018524034,0.0025841976,0.00023705319,0.00010252002,0.000048141028,0.000032315023,0.011164975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9847948,0.0068419212,0.00080461684,0.0014800058,0.0037071793,0.0023714658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97972655,0.013946675,0.0017995222,0.001639154,0.0021098058,0.0007782473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021177808,0.00027302734,0.00070589484,0.0026881502,0.008929106,0.017664218,0.0027924958,0.005964593,0.003100108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03105376,0.00052372477,0.0009499286,0.0025015562,0.037327025,0.01259167,0.0061237444,0.010880409,0.00033549833],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025674685,0.0000032508447,0.00020177661,0.0000067848337,9.796094e-7,0.00009480974,0.0013126937,0.00021534879,0.000025689935,0.9967372,0.00029930598,0.0010996605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018805893,0.00002993406,0.0015903265,0.00026350352,0.000019029712,0.00013528265,0.0049401377,0.0032587764,0.00031503156,0.95607936,0.033299383,0.00005032445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.073695995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11645102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.073695995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014181096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026992366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14653409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139869860","doi":"","title":"Jagged Little Pill: The New Frontier for Shareholder Rights Plans and the Fiduciary Duties of Target Boards","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Shareholder; Frontier; Law; Pill; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Corporate governance; Finance; Duty; Biology","score_opus":0.019466209638679087,"score_gpt":0.22651733998860896,"score_spread":0.20705113034992986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139869860","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09013113,0.0068393606,0.03616325,0.116920836,0.00076687185,0.00006582682,0.00013789666,0.00008825336,0.74888664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9262411,0.0013711185,0.0041415645,0.005564632,0.00044810868,0.00007320603,0.000023879047,0.000048642643,0.062087752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980509,0.00073843857,0.000046051115,0.0003293453,0.00044977025,0.00038553434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99733776,0.0015328333,0.00019500774,0.00039379465,0.00027708182,0.00026344668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035497,0.0003121042,0.0005145935,0.001119912,0.004990195,0.011389562,0.0012813453,0.007555139,0.018071642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00980289,0.00045312848,0.00042511147,0.0008893759,0.020424204,0.01400285,0.0036114464,0.0072639748,0.0009945371],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007706208,0.0000047470044,0.00007511447,0.0000033010203,6.889572e-7,0.0000132944615,0.0003029259,0.00004176414,0.0000344698,0.9950616,0.0014770929,0.0029773088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017529499,0.000016007252,0.0004920376,0.00007437369,0.000005903646,0.000030744435,0.0009358138,0.00066603237,0.00014346668,0.9597743,0.037826356,0.000017319673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0130362045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027275862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018071642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047078985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050213714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06045568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146344421","doi":"","title":"A Mean and Green Fighting Machine: Wartime Environmental Assessments and the Canadian Forces","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"International Environmental Law and Policies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Directive; Environmental impact assessment; Plan (archaeology); Law; Political science; Environmental law; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Public administration; Environmental science; Computer science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.010268246867230588,"score_gpt":0.2638077895058359,"score_spread":0.2535395426386053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146344421","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1024725,0.031961698,0.0023925903,0.18937148,0.000613973,0.00017108426,0.0022282249,0.00013569937,0.6706527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8067953,0.02863666,0.007165835,0.017804595,0.0001945388,0.00008338691,0.0009102824,0.00009560129,0.13831379],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99506277,0.00043419586,0.00008141704,0.00019547553,0.0032963639,0.00092981226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99631965,0.0004596435,0.00012064149,0.000059444632,0.0026260552,0.00041453415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027040758,0.0004957424,0.00023737937,0.0058655497,0.018470852,0.006845353,0.001831871,0.0024962814,0.006129293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007179597,0.00031577842,0.00041254185,0.005662461,0.006102242,0.0030962746,0.0020654004,0.0026199354,0.00026377244],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009909672,0.00008148317,0.022268744,0.0003862368,0.000051747396,0.00037741882,0.010974715,0.0043867803,0.0006517451,0.52931386,0.28808004,0.1433282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017985276,0.000031651114,0.071927086,0.0006317555,0.00006439805,0.00009622929,0.0312891,0.0035969354,0.00076117134,0.05906165,0.83230376,0.00021832917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9980692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99941313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13998781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13998781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24763285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99749225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152849106","doi":"","title":"The Story of Jane Doe: A book about rape","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Media Studies and Communication","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03192146707410422,"score_gpt":0.3366811567286839,"score_spread":0.30475968965457967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152849106","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012526567,0.63924533,0.00088694016,0.10915954,0.015640441,0.000063554086,0.00041273874,0.00015894123,0.2331799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020733923,0.34035778,0.0013394393,0.051811904,0.0077332663,0.00010020516,0.0005280972,0.00029592947,0.5770995],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994942,0.00012727668,0.000017952541,0.000033480195,0.0002735908,0.000053529577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910116,0.00043712097,0.000073801006,0.000028787996,0.00022802377,0.00013108898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035315938,0.0007542508,0.00060745643,0.0011622836,0.0029326128,0.0031124551,0.00084848935,0.0028006968,0.020346886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025391383,0.00037521246,0.00028395237,0.0018652251,0.0021507016,0.0030623071,0.001265008,0.0033559962,0.006771665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004889802,0.0000037209122,0.000040057253,0.0001255496,0.0000027577757,0.00013796278,0.0011822707,0.00001960952,0.00006568188,0.0024524122,0.9817376,0.014227475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011731354,0.000004929095,0.0002132816,0.00035893597,0.0000032079492,0.00037893033,0.0009533878,0.0000061691712,0.000037512906,0.0006964064,0.9973418,0.0000042669967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030154103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.093747675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030154103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002468287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041426364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068067074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163197924","doi":"","title":"From en ventre sa mere to Thawing an Heir: Posthumously Conceived Children and the Implications for Succession Law in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Ecological succession; Legislation; Law; Estate; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Warrant; Probate; Political science; Sociology; Common law; Business","score_opus":0.022319177134371253,"score_gpt":0.3173481726711056,"score_spread":0.29502899553673434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163197924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6723602,0.0069100056,0.0012043894,0.12118906,0.0003805319,0.00014030623,0.0002979637,0.000028506818,0.19748908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9652667,0.002139997,0.00064272905,0.012547133,0.00003870912,0.00002327335,0.000041950767,0.000011428805,0.019288208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99481213,0.0005589462,0.00012830042,0.0003555809,0.0011923459,0.0029526933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99416554,0.0016881021,0.00058522855,0.00012640569,0.0015013354,0.0019334004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004169102,0.0002320605,0.00041933937,0.0010118488,0.03606136,0.00948673,0.002994927,0.00414814,0.005206233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009181644,0.00039121948,0.00037081743,0.0017771723,0.019324021,0.0020304509,0.005148413,0.0067933705,0.00017022378],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007894328,0.000116504605,0.04872932,0.00015200498,0.000026587808,0.0034604014,0.12451475,0.000858258,0.0008346888,0.7599922,0.02975007,0.03148625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013342919,0.00018434689,0.13764504,0.0013979818,0.00013401236,0.0019208919,0.42656258,0.002716877,0.0019736513,0.06051749,0.36640447,0.00040925597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.993083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99796957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15221949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15221949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29577416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9833052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2173424207","doi":"","title":"International Commercial Arbitration in China: Locating the Development of CIETAC in the Context of International and Domestic Factors","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"China; Arbitration; Context (archaeology); Order (exchange); Commission; Principal (computer security); Work (physics); International trade; Domestic market; Economics; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.027912127571993007,"score_gpt":0.2750681242874617,"score_spread":0.24715599671546867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2173424207","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.907719,0.0016319139,0.00043838713,0.002208049,0.00002087357,0.000057334786,0.000052491014,0.000013626389,0.08785845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974523,0.0003398353,0.00020649385,0.000055926386,0.0000058935184,0.00000871426,0.000019366978,0.000002326733,0.0019091605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984414,0.0002961411,0.0001076022,0.00017309509,0.00037927448,0.0006024662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99678385,0.0006888845,0.00079713913,0.00022898655,0.0008001926,0.0007010671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002782961,0.00022803417,0.0002704972,0.0043405886,0.004031867,0.0063480497,0.00074062456,0.0005707706,0.0029256984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004059409,0.0002319041,0.00021374566,0.0072732745,0.006008099,0.002779061,0.0027861784,0.0011927094,0.00013284925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010647605,0.00009620805,0.35877332,0.00020342747,0.00003203718,0.0020945286,0.05701314,0.0009805528,0.0017588777,0.47411782,0.003474111,0.101349436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018054268,0.0001422301,0.86027616,0.00029997274,0.000032829685,0.0006347008,0.043293074,0.0045839995,0.0015250705,0.020529706,0.068583295,0.00008084643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.069784276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09494135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.069784276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012813974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017649349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13875622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2173772894","doi":"","title":"Bringing Meaning to First Nations Consultation in the British Columbia Salmon Aquaculture Industry","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Law; Context (archaeology); Indigenous; Jurisprudence; Government (linguistics); Seriousness; Aquaculture; Supreme court; Sociology; Political science; History; Fishery; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Archaeology; Ecology","score_opus":0.033863107061648266,"score_gpt":0.3246822346768829,"score_spread":0.29081912761523465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2173772894","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35931486,0.005180692,0.00087654137,0.11172255,0.00027125425,0.000047897345,0.000043291664,0.000036793648,0.5225061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.956231,0.0011549297,0.00033328962,0.011952076,0.000021217487,0.000028853607,0.0000110724695,0.000013345481,0.030254273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880932,0.0045324997,0.00020389294,0.00046934278,0.0021032558,0.004597806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98722535,0.0071124053,0.0006853574,0.000286316,0.0021911499,0.0024992642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057523893,0.00023566237,0.00031768804,0.0010908745,0.05279716,0.011490072,0.0013785633,0.007788686,0.0053028506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015491848,0.0004669188,0.00021779639,0.0016308118,0.025594499,0.0034728947,0.008795053,0.008176785,0.00043453317],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005036451,0.00006215813,0.011629108,0.0001468235,0.000012891722,0.004946561,0.45223543,0.00047325355,0.0010198323,0.45788154,0.046694268,0.024847733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026447282,0.000056305034,0.033395626,0.00079362135,0.00003208418,0.001022758,0.57831895,0.0008488524,0.00059906254,0.038640745,0.34604383,0.0002215926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9354175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97700864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0715585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0715585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.106063746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5191957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2174983601","doi":"","title":"Case Comment: Canada (A-G) v. S.D. Meyers, Inc., [2004] 3 F.C.J. No. 29.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Tribunal; Jurisdiction; Damages; Political science; Law; Government (linguistics); Subject (documents); Investment (military); Law and economics; Business; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.022475313116704396,"score_gpt":0.246952587945943,"score_spread":0.2244772748292386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2174983601","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015059048,0.004272293,0.0009301963,0.7106335,0.0052960543,0.0002953437,0.0039226813,0.00028014026,0.2593107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.056672886,0.0025945532,0.0007320862,0.70358753,0.0011621561,0.00019097819,0.0009405218,0.00008771456,0.23403157],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99709153,0.00013646181,0.00008570393,0.00042442972,0.0010975566,0.001164303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982784,0.0005250833,0.00008192519,0.000038752823,0.0008518023,0.00022413285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014741247,0.0012698814,0.000644855,0.0014066248,0.021022974,0.0057568094,0.0037163198,0.03441578,0.017950164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055914894,0.0009130647,0.0012813043,0.0019329423,0.0030218603,0.002299095,0.0012989437,0.017090684,0.0031195336],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005291304,0.0000388726,0.0018636016,0.00006007228,0.000019143867,0.0013765622,0.0020009922,0.00019471349,0.00036013135,0.032434963,0.9575917,0.004006311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008660293,0.00003537904,0.0076563573,0.0002921071,0.00009188114,0.0007422693,0.005361279,0.0005890816,0.00091157557,0.0057278452,0.9783161,0.00018941343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9443955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96975446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055604517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034313884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05178765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24896586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2217130762","doi":"","title":"Frontline Providers of Mental Healthcare: The Role of Police Officers in Involuntary Psychiatric Assessments Under the Mental Health Care And Treatment Act","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Mental health; Context (archaeology); Mental healthcare; Mental Health Act; Apprehension; Officer; Health care; Legislation; Nursing; Psychology; Statutory law; Psychiatry; Medicine; Public relations; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.021750546296385034,"score_gpt":0.3538858773562764,"score_spread":0.3321353310598914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2217130762","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12992816,0.008077129,0.0010361916,0.81635076,0.0031786421,0.00006682707,0.000034552548,0.000034427263,0.04129339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85117096,0.007090335,0.00094888883,0.1271998,0.0017640815,0.00007373424,0.000021108499,0.000031491792,0.011699609],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.988015,0.006313707,0.0003355264,0.0005719451,0.0011991628,0.003564701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977136,0.011378569,0.003297057,0.00044496497,0.0030638333,0.004679565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008399905,0.00022366061,0.0002503032,0.0006605982,0.018265724,0.009301273,0.0020365366,0.0059504462,0.003496678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02146639,0.00044717646,0.00023605749,0.00061389036,0.012689151,0.005991511,0.0046609994,0.008921214,0.000456468],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020241014,0.00027787714,0.040501453,0.0006388341,0.000029384713,0.006950339,0.47626835,0.00028467985,0.001250402,0.07938452,0.28938398,0.10482775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035615965,0.0001943863,0.049079984,0.0026291276,0.0000580472,0.001815564,0.56439596,0.00043796003,0.000509383,0.005109637,0.37561688,0.00011739015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24672359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.52732795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7532764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018721763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045562975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49057502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2276470016","doi":"","title":"An Uneasy Relationship: Combating a Global Threat Through International Trade","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; European union; Sovereignty; Politics; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Jurisprudence; International trade; Law; Political economy; Economics","score_opus":0.047356612437845697,"score_gpt":0.3888039403700382,"score_spread":0.34144732793219246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2276470016","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025902746,0.005200866,0.008687861,0.2632202,0.0008247059,0.00004426872,0.000032005384,0.00004346916,0.69604385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8031887,0.004267049,0.004459606,0.12195508,0.001009789,0.00012487263,0.000022454416,0.00006609798,0.06490642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99301684,0.0038989398,0.00019833805,0.00081874983,0.0014234199,0.0006438188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954614,0.0030656795,0.00036629685,0.000466673,0.00043451853,0.00020531585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008052407,0.00030243807,0.00033778002,0.0007763263,0.008575482,0.012622477,0.0010148198,0.0111338245,0.0057465644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009696427,0.00022521868,0.00038448925,0.0008314787,0.030229528,0.009538546,0.006019338,0.009809872,0.0006973157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054181232,0.000007882631,0.00015184036,0.000009639367,0.0000025581103,0.00015214302,0.0020942912,0.00008436622,0.000080316924,0.9910075,0.0041701985,0.0022338117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029757064,0.000051420895,0.00069396436,0.00033649002,0.000017403901,0.0005028569,0.007893397,0.0009220253,0.00043470337,0.64655894,0.34251946,0.000039706312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010626611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0102475425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012622477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045121526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005248477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04258573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2281601326","doi":"","title":"Getting Our Act Together: A Review of the Canadian Derivatives Regulatory Landscape and an Argument for a Dedicated Derivatives Regime","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Global Financial Regulation and Crises","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Ambiguity; Argument (complex analysis); Scope (computer science); Derivatives market; Law and economics; Enforcement; Business; Guardian; Political science; Industrial organization; Public economics; Economics; Law; Computer science; Finance; Futures contract","score_opus":0.0710882603641722,"score_gpt":0.3331007918230887,"score_spread":0.2620125314589165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2281601326","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031522512,0.68703014,0.0026269138,0.1558224,0.0067291716,0.00008417627,0.0004169582,0.00013237142,0.14400558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08893213,0.79572195,0.0045352224,0.06457746,0.002792322,0.00006258971,0.00039820708,0.00017723715,0.042802837],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9806786,0.0015541948,0.0007888714,0.0012806557,0.013095506,0.0026022182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.976222,0.0042050635,0.00083790324,0.00049509184,0.016720764,0.0015192732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011487051,0.0010710342,0.00086352765,0.010368254,0.015641285,0.015078951,0.0050452948,0.007160656,0.0054610274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022970269,0.00092967495,0.0010611219,0.017253576,0.016058663,0.0054518264,0.0021571664,0.00872627,0.0010833937],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003617907,0.000047359612,0.0016509804,0.0024242224,0.00003682339,0.0005549823,0.0036093986,0.0017238446,0.00042873784,0.39766842,0.4235034,0.16831575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037451432,0.000008859265,0.001883981,0.0014403613,0.00001612073,0.00012892399,0.00081694993,0.0001975058,0.00014382604,0.004159737,0.99114335,0.000056789908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97934055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98401827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17216301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17216301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3252905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96017355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283415456","doi":"","title":"Advertising and the Charter: Just Do It? An Analysis of the Constitutional Recognition of Commercial Expression","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Jurisprudence; Expression (computer science); Constitutional law; Political science; Politics; Marketplace of ideas; Sociology; First amendment; Computer science","score_opus":0.0467082171192189,"score_gpt":0.32601063120417223,"score_spread":0.2793024140849533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283415456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05187286,0.0068165823,0.015272978,0.041901957,0.0004658115,0.00008651469,0.00012958677,0.000089022156,0.88336474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93770325,0.0022335937,0.0025626456,0.008372606,0.00067270105,0.00014525423,0.00006367524,0.00008884889,0.04815741],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884165,0.0034145806,0.00033537942,0.0015384625,0.0039570695,0.002338089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933769,0.0042014746,0.00039216824,0.0006095567,0.0011193914,0.00030049664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007623699,0.0004223482,0.0006317713,0.0018306437,0.012209915,0.017495872,0.0020280406,0.0075255143,0.0055180592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0129146,0.0005877572,0.00075873546,0.0021918276,0.045400232,0.008622988,0.0031356493,0.010560395,0.0006630761],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016737824,0.0000033659608,0.00003932365,0.0000030226017,5.2079724e-7,0.00001840735,0.00059743173,0.000027015902,0.00003154475,0.9977748,0.0007040596,0.0007988384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004129493,0.00004273929,0.0017143947,0.00018086094,0.000038402482,0.0001400268,0.0028598572,0.001170542,0.00092837197,0.8173833,0.1754262,0.000073901196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1927273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.122464634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8072727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02302411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02034357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38321102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2313398693","doi":"","title":"The Concept of Payment: Wire Transfer Orders, the Common Law and Article 4A","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Payment; Obligation; Business; Debt; Liability; Beneficiary; Law; Order (exchange); Point (geometry); Law and economics; Uniform Commercial Code; Conflict of laws; Economics; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.037008939791999665,"score_gpt":0.252018743073701,"score_spread":0.21500980328170133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2313398693","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037302874,0.00977246,0.12968175,0.043253887,0.0013698839,0.00041342262,0.00034040102,0.00021943427,0.7776458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8200015,0.004850385,0.049089897,0.015582034,0.002318797,0.0012333009,0.0002381744,0.00015435481,0.106531546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98866475,0.0042692553,0.00083992415,0.0010982675,0.0040438874,0.0010837546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951041,0.0023915565,0.0007206756,0.0007187555,0.00086192886,0.00020305152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064457473,0.00062165345,0.0004438072,0.002275181,0.005633306,0.011058505,0.0019092351,0.00958994,0.0038895684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011172783,0.00060512626,0.0006763425,0.0027054287,0.03514281,0.012815481,0.0038620664,0.008554043,0.0010430575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026194073,0.0000026859218,0.00003632339,0.000004758584,4.4765278e-7,0.000015587284,0.00026725972,0.000048700767,0.000017511673,0.9975383,0.0009881648,0.0010775108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012362359,0.00004185715,0.00078427844,0.00018837434,0.000008152045,0.0001485786,0.0005296506,0.0010901726,0.0003231971,0.87204045,0.124798715,0.000034210316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023300696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0155424075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023300696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009429023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011783399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06841266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339319031","doi":"","title":"You Can't Take the Sky from Me: A Gramscian Interpretation of the Common Heritage of Mankind Principle in Space Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Space exploration and regulation","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Law; Hegemony; Interpretation (philosophy); International law; Space (punctuation); Space law; Sociology; Political science; Outer space; Philosophy; Politics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.027720453133091717,"score_gpt":0.29162765206194474,"score_spread":0.263907198928853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339319031","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06517731,0.009214866,0.01132334,0.19010663,0.0008805599,0.000036975027,0.000085379594,0.00006841731,0.7231066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93348396,0.0024633198,0.002052793,0.020555155,0.00064861967,0.000061172665,0.00003268503,0.000052251555,0.040649995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976102,0.0010608152,0.00005133097,0.00026985197,0.0005355026,0.0004722179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902046,0.00056598405,0.00011826009,0.00006590688,0.00015107963,0.000078199075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027040283,0.00031672997,0.0002990014,0.0011044798,0.0088048475,0.008033917,0.0010876621,0.005717153,0.0030041889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035586772,0.00023415458,0.00027680796,0.0015082038,0.037901614,0.006445192,0.0037549087,0.005528287,0.0004061127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002592946,0.0000032504224,0.000056526824,0.000004236521,4.2768127e-7,0.00003371285,0.002456458,0.000051148447,0.000019739897,0.9933436,0.00289194,0.0011363329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015790069,0.000011731532,0.0006670826,0.000081722384,0.000004227377,0.0000495981,0.0043540755,0.00047911092,0.00014606192,0.87989783,0.11427532,0.000017437442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04274692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041182056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04274692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011439819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006974032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08499622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340946344","doi":"","title":"Following Digital Media into the Courtroom: Publicity and the Open Court Principle in the Information Age","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Publicity; Publication; Economic Justice; Democracy; Narrative; Social media; Freedom of the press; Normative; Supreme court; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.05299997535309214,"score_gpt":0.3500924784065506,"score_spread":0.29709250305345847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2340946344","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.076398045,0.0034826633,0.01459327,0.09383985,0.00038004154,0.00005845371,0.00007113473,0.000083514315,0.81109303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9720561,0.00094790827,0.0013006907,0.0056312066,0.00016973063,0.0000466749,0.000012149407,0.00003209308,0.01980349],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9834383,0.00967506,0.0005234427,0.0015320656,0.0030052694,0.0018257822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98011976,0.014091195,0.0012350004,0.0016408061,0.001549953,0.0013632298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010612689,0.0003123346,0.00040077665,0.0019779152,0.024438813,0.033565715,0.0021125267,0.0076563046,0.007820195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02270611,0.00065157213,0.00034173767,0.0021164857,0.08087966,0.018307976,0.013643596,0.008552555,0.00091923133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000090117155,0.000014827657,0.00036528183,0.00002226171,0.0000027744634,0.00018442805,0.026719423,0.0001222434,0.00011003013,0.9618065,0.00285093,0.0077922028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004130513,0.000060212198,0.0028203432,0.00072160945,0.00003152011,0.0003068284,0.066140704,0.00087594613,0.0013047185,0.5956943,0.33187053,0.0001319657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13326783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14678559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13326783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02103061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020539653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26498425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343595580","doi":"","title":"Caveat Cloudster: Why Traditional Common and Civil Property Law Should Apply to Virtual Property and How It Will Change the Legal Realities of the Internet","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Tangible property; Property (philosophy); Property law; Intangible property; Intellectual property; Digital Millennium Copyright Act; Law and economics; Business; Property rights; Real property; Internet privacy; Law; Computer science; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.1856089506789757,"score_gpt":0.3280840012781128,"score_spread":0.14247505059913712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343595580","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003013106,0.002091523,0.009091412,0.8765041,0.005341605,0.000047856174,0.00029196579,0.00026623567,0.10335215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20342946,0.004215777,0.016487334,0.67033076,0.00819742,0.000354251,0.00022771393,0.00066315033,0.096094064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899004,0.0021902684,0.0005020181,0.002477393,0.003521611,0.0014082965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96819466,0.021608507,0.0013052514,0.0026591802,0.0053605507,0.00087177946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01242103,0.0008951673,0.0013249575,0.0013404883,0.012161712,0.013175751,0.0045519397,0.021054912,0.03036632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.064473845,0.00077606033,0.0018125189,0.0017238123,0.029927725,0.026622383,0.0056294375,0.038528286,0.0070538823],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012908491,0.00001466548,0.00025454545,0.000045999725,0.000006906321,0.00011172971,0.00089633925,0.00019518129,0.000052429623,0.8648903,0.12844001,0.0050790594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050163275,0.000015764972,0.00046020997,0.00025721404,0.000015196563,0.0001937488,0.001183044,0.001149164,0.00035731157,0.73552155,0.2607134,0.000083105166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09383469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07588489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09383469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012353634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020970354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18657702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343821668","doi":"","title":"Canadian Prison Needle-Exchange Programs: Can the Health Benefits Overcome the Current Legal Barriers?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Legislature; Government (linguistics); Harm; Agency (philosophy); Political science; Charter; Public health; Public administration; Law; Criminology; Medicine; Sociology; Nursing","score_opus":0.10642020846571186,"score_gpt":0.3714246316988311,"score_spread":0.26500442323311924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343821668","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032838363,0.40628684,0.00045194192,0.4756883,0.0017479402,0.00023096894,0.0016412276,0.000042855994,0.08107164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4760829,0.43516707,0.0028504136,0.0751105,0.0013390238,0.00014844546,0.00085769757,0.000030132303,0.008413814],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933891,0.0014329945,0.00020166385,0.00027768876,0.003643597,0.0010549303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9830456,0.0042674737,0.00136686,0.00031323338,0.00895415,0.002052759],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077204877,0.00060552603,0.000858027,0.002938325,0.005572918,0.004407677,0.0026594466,0.0028067827,0.007660374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037595425,0.00026792873,0.00087872625,0.0044818996,0.0032614402,0.0027479357,0.0015519859,0.0025890404,0.0003048091],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051893806,0.0003172247,0.04225744,0.013093893,0.0005277278,0.0006502458,0.0059344554,0.00092256005,0.00037661204,0.09399251,0.20590082,0.63550746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052951975,0.00049619545,0.20883584,0.030954354,0.001850793,0.0004987096,0.018287163,0.0010817961,0.0006307603,0.017354175,0.71912956,0.00035114968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98938423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99618846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07777754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07777754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23657936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5643182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344828161","doi":"","title":"Edward Snowden: Hero or Traitor? Considering the Implications for Canadian National Security and Whistleblower Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Military and Defense Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"United States National Security Agency; Law; National security; Agency (philosophy); Statutory law; Government (linguistics); Political science; Jurisprudence; Sociology","score_opus":0.12416158155690674,"score_gpt":0.3764097731773454,"score_spread":0.25224819162043866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344828161","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058250345,0.011422622,0.0012351484,0.6150247,0.0015207719,0.00006006962,0.00014213537,0.00004530653,0.31229886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76111984,0.011575353,0.0018652449,0.12287918,0.00046475913,0.000046006633,0.00008176703,0.00006704545,0.10190076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948531,0.00077024254,0.000104257895,0.00057056715,0.0018736138,0.0018282682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99218845,0.003239883,0.00029685633,0.00023725304,0.0028537167,0.0011838045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004483657,0.0004047937,0.0005169984,0.0016792478,0.0402559,0.012583763,0.002647476,0.00888382,0.0057680127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012848656,0.00040909083,0.00039117958,0.002558732,0.024097936,0.00518338,0.0033107998,0.0088532735,0.00032830966],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017422288,0.000016037051,0.0019575427,0.000053614698,0.0000058731875,0.00074490684,0.032994643,0.00020487019,0.00016986376,0.833314,0.12270812,0.007813092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030203973,0.0000245902,0.0058140866,0.0006096982,0.000034597204,0.00033976525,0.09111478,0.0010820953,0.00040401643,0.106274374,0.79410255,0.00016928365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9853749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9913127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10223904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10223904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.116804495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74179965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2414595098","doi":"","title":"Comfort Women in Japan and Korea","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Comfort women; Pleasure; Human rights; Law; World War II; Political science; Work (physics); International law; Sociology; Gender studies; History; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.05175822352926611,"score_gpt":0.2389391361095546,"score_spread":0.18718091258028852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2414595098","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.937867,0.00288908,0.00012237152,0.0075328783,0.0001583051,0.000021458762,0.000029799303,0.000008182166,0.051370896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844111,0.0011270989,0.00006943987,0.00220459,0.00003445229,0.000014849915,0.000017844792,0.000011409617,0.012109091],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992213,0.00015578786,0.000027233427,0.00009039047,0.000053762342,0.0004514858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994134,0.000053547916,0.00014864822,0.000020965905,0.000047839774,0.00031549452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000860368,0.0003556403,0.00028235908,0.000686703,0.01227575,0.004838948,0.00042035175,0.0016070849,0.005713891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00090171216,0.0003847866,0.00018066769,0.0011104177,0.0075304518,0.0037622668,0.0061507146,0.002183664,0.0002967358],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019637683,0.00009682462,0.04816628,0.00029954547,0.00002821675,0.0069558066,0.7547754,0.00007961181,0.0029191682,0.1580875,0.008396176,0.01999901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033183704,0.00009778688,0.04443646,0.00022307856,0.000041656356,0.0012653228,0.7321358,0.00009757448,0.00046906128,0.004208116,0.21692738,0.00006463163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03934911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.106556214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03934911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005285835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047483984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.078240156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2414767070","doi":"","title":"Lesbian Mothers & Gay Fathers: Overt and Subconscious Homophobic Biases Concerning Parenting Fitness","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Subconscious; Impartiality; Presumption; Adversarial system; Lesbian; Homosexuality; Morality; Psychology; Law; Adjudication; Social psychology; Sociology; Criminology; Political science; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.07527631941376424,"score_gpt":0.35789675035867685,"score_spread":0.2826204309449126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2414767070","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97768843,0.00062595884,0.00020577447,0.003957365,0.00004979319,0.00001074331,0.000007684358,0.000005088398,0.01744921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976139,0.00035531714,0.000056233148,0.00076787424,0.000024036344,0.000007800794,0.0000031834315,0.000002933316,0.0011687252],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978719,0.0015008671,0.00004730689,0.00010734082,0.00026631134,0.00020616289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977247,0.0012588309,0.0005407879,0.000113046,0.0001266189,0.00023592176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027700868,0.00022186842,0.00022677294,0.0006315804,0.0040756348,0.0028344388,0.00031597205,0.0010603045,0.003648664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072355233,0.00031988783,0.000098848934,0.00033883503,0.006205869,0.0012358227,0.0022257227,0.0019055224,0.0002794903],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054537875,0.00011858713,0.0885859,0.000055617307,0.000015260928,0.006708565,0.86635697,0.000030982275,0.0015208538,0.015624054,0.0022041874,0.018724438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018075141,0.00008330853,0.079734966,0.0002374765,0.00001944313,0.010092245,0.88904357,0.00012938786,0.00054779765,0.00533154,0.014738454,0.000023739758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074191843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019427482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074191843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008540074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074866164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01475203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2423530761","doi":"","title":"Towards a Canadian Policy for Patenting Disease Genes","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Commodification; Monopoly; Genetic testing; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Business; Sociology; Economics; Biology; Genetics","score_opus":0.19744960172335116,"score_gpt":0.27263002168022293,"score_spread":0.07518041995687177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2423530761","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062879287,0.0038935847,0.006072516,0.87705404,0.0017262468,0.00020045352,0.00022480023,0.00020734883,0.10433306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22708905,0.009386518,0.03227994,0.5956281,0.0026261364,0.00031431377,0.00040563152,0.00017801576,0.13209231],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.958148,0.00663515,0.0013914477,0.0037271425,0.02201367,0.0080846315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94589984,0.016352864,0.0019415201,0.0029167652,0.024203938,0.008685052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037413236,0.0009826664,0.0011078228,0.0068705683,0.022817628,0.020595364,0.005297647,0.039626822,0.007939533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.076154046,0.0012601502,0.0019623768,0.0059946817,0.019749325,0.010764187,0.007005013,0.020122113,0.0012207773],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049066573,0.000052580686,0.0009808214,0.00011924195,0.000024733637,0.0003599238,0.0016894293,0.0013028102,0.00080054684,0.8239549,0.14861818,0.0220479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001770582,0.00007654759,0.0035631156,0.00042401833,0.00008924893,0.0001990552,0.0015286381,0.0032902027,0.00090355624,0.10989123,0.87963706,0.00022035501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96500486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9517907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8447448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1552552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.41659406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97978425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2432384416","doi":"","title":"The Enigma of Stigma: A New Environmental Contamination Challenge Facing Canada's Judiciary","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Plaintiff; Stigma (botany); Property (philosophy); Feeling; Law; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.02922733059646029,"score_gpt":0.2711385022332036,"score_spread":0.24191117163674333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2432384416","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011479188,0.0055359933,0.00065314374,0.9567917,0.0009469572,0.000011597571,0.000026996913,0.000011877062,0.024542602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5539604,0.013319864,0.0021721811,0.408061,0.0019413037,0.00005073163,0.00004314362,0.00007583938,0.02037552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98942417,0.002259062,0.00022236131,0.0010059306,0.0037431694,0.0033453403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9796657,0.008380761,0.0007073652,0.00065188814,0.004706345,0.005887898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011304493,0.00044838912,0.0009998254,0.0018652527,0.069886155,0.021895682,0.0041963356,0.025164988,0.004427825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019683156,0.00065712485,0.00083407277,0.0030107612,0.067856446,0.009725591,0.008416248,0.031658087,0.000340956],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038387494,0.000051555617,0.0049290895,0.00012525872,0.00002985111,0.0015650339,0.07499833,0.00037887442,0.0003215169,0.6386849,0.2419599,0.036917318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007787499,0.000030650408,0.007806691,0.0010206655,0.00004783485,0.0007594652,0.15099669,0.001183386,0.00022192804,0.31199455,0.52559614,0.00026421496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96448964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98484045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1278266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1278266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23095314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92745125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2489364563","doi":"","title":"Six Degrees of Separation: Canadian Accessory Liability in Afghan War Crimes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Complicity; Doctrine; Causation; Law; Torture; Commit; Political science; Liability; War crime; Principal (computer security); Criminal law; Legal doctrine; Sociology; International law; Criminology; Human rights","score_opus":0.16316883978141764,"score_gpt":0.40295478023378983,"score_spread":0.2397859404523722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2489364563","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74404174,0.002723802,0.000660997,0.020220501,0.00014724664,0.00007745357,0.00020999082,0.0000142242725,0.2319041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99028873,0.0008329524,0.00017943031,0.0015891878,0.000021759977,0.0000110310175,0.000052260835,0.0000077930345,0.007016892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964091,0.00029371286,0.00009479263,0.0002563764,0.0010306028,0.0019154602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970451,0.00039794506,0.00046132883,0.00011287121,0.00077277794,0.0012099901],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011931532,0.00029290555,0.00037067605,0.002127797,0.02426152,0.004569904,0.0014857436,0.002061354,0.00501358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006298062,0.00031914306,0.00036996312,0.0031176065,0.01285977,0.0016738877,0.007728778,0.004916978,0.00017996125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016708278,0.00013283678,0.089047894,0.00012742022,0.000038338145,0.0051124576,0.13250382,0.0007414993,0.0005781015,0.6865002,0.028481591,0.05656873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000105116465,0.00011397234,0.3235996,0.0007889685,0.00018196781,0.0071722562,0.26969486,0.0021691215,0.0007896399,0.07827009,0.31676266,0.00035169168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97659886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9886241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058322556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.058322556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06760949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42316175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2492725761","doi":"","title":"Throwing Caution to the Wind: The Precautionary Principle, NAFTA and Environmental Protection in Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Precautionary principle; Government (linguistics); Supreme court; Corporation; Law; Economics; Arbitration; Environmental law; Damages; Political science; Law and economics; International trade","score_opus":0.018964589100477852,"score_gpt":0.22658185899853717,"score_spread":0.20761726989805931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2492725761","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.086582445,0.042271722,0.0015520888,0.27792007,0.0011087211,0.00011219995,0.00044707232,0.000052824762,0.58995295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80542433,0.024218747,0.0022231382,0.05488275,0.0003046822,0.00006732903,0.00018360089,0.000046892914,0.1126485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99546546,0.0003556263,0.00011727903,0.0003619114,0.0019280058,0.001771755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99693656,0.0010769787,0.00019071781,0.00007627421,0.0013355626,0.00038383948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022095374,0.00031649394,0.00039008496,0.0018038395,0.02730727,0.013512717,0.0018014798,0.0074936775,0.0038375678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008445535,0.0004791054,0.0004818621,0.0029753775,0.012762833,0.002844247,0.002350712,0.00760139,0.00022230674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002349539,0.000018999113,0.004756741,0.00008041084,0.000017791934,0.0006021962,0.008190404,0.0007704382,0.0002077571,0.90712357,0.06578893,0.012419197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005561833,0.000032096046,0.02597785,0.0010058312,0.00013922568,0.0003596591,0.024333166,0.0023388136,0.0008198198,0.10307294,0.84162307,0.00024191733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9966763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99836415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14852633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14852633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25320265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98758876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2496032426","doi":"","title":"Justice Defiled: Perverts, Potheads, Serial Killers and Lawyers","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Economic Justice; Law; Criminology; Political science","score_opus":0.04368018531065314,"score_gpt":0.3349392624279341,"score_spread":0.29125907711728094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2496032426","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00029702878,0.94596845,0.000095127776,0.033239722,0.0037085866,0.0000055622245,0.00002931921,0.000010392555,0.016645826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018978523,0.8422612,0.00030366034,0.025476912,0.008595307,0.0000376384,0.00011595479,0.000036582678,0.10419428],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991296,0.00025919743,0.000047369587,0.00009741787,0.00036990203,0.00009642102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847907,0.0007318143,0.00016801106,0.000032624117,0.0004390103,0.00014947602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009777755,0.0007107601,0.0007868204,0.0027853295,0.0022298214,0.0052970257,0.0011401919,0.0033650035,0.010483283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033423922,0.00047137588,0.00023142723,0.004182282,0.0035203625,0.0058064614,0.0013378622,0.0033637001,0.0023356904],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001357046,0.0000149376165,0.00015640097,0.00053022656,0.0000067599276,0.00008145305,0.0013252663,0.00006533126,0.000041907173,0.026203675,0.91762865,0.05393175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060852194,0.0000088675715,0.0006251681,0.0012979764,0.0000071764475,0.0001282605,0.0012885131,0.000017792667,0.00002473624,0.008874429,0.9877142,0.0000067307788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042643238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09167721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042643238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004777049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009541853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08479005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2500099449","doi":"","title":"Stepping Forward or Stumbling Back? Command Responsibility For Failure To Act, Civilian Superiors and the International Criminal Court","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Doctrine; Statute; International law; Status quo; Customary international law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Sociology; Public international law","score_opus":0.07423058133334896,"score_gpt":0.36258965850681424,"score_spread":0.28835907717346526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2500099449","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.086668216,0.011435264,0.0039433744,0.29644063,0.0009456339,0.000022693774,0.000060373248,0.00008137228,0.6004024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.930472,0.002957084,0.0006440091,0.017391779,0.00050163583,0.000019277848,0.000019895862,0.00003234768,0.047962137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967573,0.00088992756,0.00008996778,0.00046088657,0.00073591963,0.001066092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99798065,0.0009975042,0.00019621727,0.00020913013,0.00029799363,0.00031849995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037651078,0.00023110221,0.0003502594,0.0014282159,0.008106691,0.011873423,0.0011735947,0.00674171,0.0058003427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0083862245,0.00025865788,0.00040231185,0.0009791356,0.022047002,0.007903485,0.0035423536,0.007890111,0.0005476578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035733692,0.0000067028536,0.0005235317,0.000007348584,0.0000015041712,0.000069985435,0.0011329523,0.00012937801,0.00002862262,0.9837683,0.009292801,0.005035312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029733132,0.000036751357,0.0053837337,0.00024918048,0.000024288962,0.00019554391,0.011605029,0.0018307128,0.0004557607,0.76349914,0.21662556,0.00006454389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09687231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09620759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09687231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012084834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012358697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19261688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2507324678","doi":"","title":"Private Party Access to the Competition Tribunal: A Critical Evaluation of the Section 103.1 Experiment","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Merger and Competition Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Competition (biology); Section (typography); Order (exchange); Law; Perspective (graphical); Business; Political science; Advertising; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.10241826460849257,"score_gpt":0.3516379735212946,"score_spread":0.24921970891280204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2507324678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60508496,0.0013611736,0.021376656,0.049755592,0.0022715724,0.008861334,0.0016458479,0.00031020681,0.30933267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93007916,0.00052124634,0.0063697626,0.026516933,0.0011462582,0.008022238,0.00024171485,0.00013243138,0.026970267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.93326265,0.042667855,0.0018637154,0.0051440606,0.011948886,0.0051128836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.56585354,0.3934728,0.012242856,0.01525352,0.010817434,0.0023598406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08563786,0.0008467174,0.0018669553,0.0013032401,0.008839255,0.008314925,0.0034435994,0.012413474,0.027133953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17906402,0.00084345334,0.0015813005,0.0015163494,0.01430637,0.010658653,0.0051946067,0.010883606,0.0021839328],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.023849318,0.015561409,0.0058611627,0.0010170018,0.0006108174,0.0007521207,0.016097924,0.0036416792,0.0036618647,0.8236345,0.059011053,0.046301134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03728609,0.029126598,0.02799491,0.0012166287,0.0024673776,0.00026361976,0.026534086,0.021175984,0.01976509,0.57323414,0.26019686,0.00073861895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011979754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010950458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9910807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008919284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008864435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45290172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510048207","doi":"","title":"Predatory Pricing in the Canadian Context","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Merger and Competition Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Predatory pricing; Competition (biology); Legislation; Context (archaeology); Subject (documents); Economics; Law and economics; Competition policy; Competition law; Positive economics; Sociology; Business; Industrial organization; Public economics; Law; Microeconomics; Political science; Ecology; Monopoly; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.048291475608333106,"score_gpt":0.25222358496364233,"score_spread":0.20393210935530923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510048207","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42044523,0.013112055,0.0014439148,0.08994675,0.00044122312,0.00014025647,0.0014129486,0.00009382248,0.47296384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9497388,0.0067855185,0.0010112094,0.0053807795,0.00011341112,0.000022768916,0.00018027874,0.00003660905,0.036730554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968874,0.00021463528,0.00006460395,0.0002775773,0.0010937899,0.0014619381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99627054,0.00043621295,0.0002433888,0.00010508952,0.0019196684,0.001025142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016134183,0.00030815997,0.00046927927,0.0028711476,0.020762809,0.008765534,0.001957208,0.0033989148,0.012153592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059928265,0.00042233575,0.0005593083,0.006354378,0.0066581056,0.0021611596,0.0025311462,0.003138384,0.00040891912],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013516212,0.000113218375,0.030732853,0.0001919638,0.000051816467,0.0037130914,0.016368737,0.0027598075,0.0006920372,0.8102334,0.08242942,0.052578475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007983044,0.0000824815,0.19743381,0.00057692366,0.000146315,0.00183599,0.045445677,0.0074590766,0.00055827474,0.08423289,0.6615401,0.00060868723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99779713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99871993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2019861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2019861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18992527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.925583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2511552638","doi":"","title":"Student-on-Student Harassment: A New Paradigm for Canadian Human Rights Legislation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal Issues in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Harassment; Law; Legislation; Complaint; Human rights; Respondent; Duty; Political science; Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Sociology","score_opus":0.05912060140927287,"score_gpt":0.41909496067436636,"score_spread":0.35997435926509347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2511552638","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018340442,0.008777621,0.014374767,0.3698827,0.0016792604,0.0001971222,0.0001656894,0.00008125485,0.5865012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.722431,0.014786856,0.026803551,0.10537578,0.0009517848,0.00038118276,0.00016717054,0.00013975549,0.1289629],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865019,0.0029901247,0.00031241184,0.0013074466,0.005202253,0.0036858937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927127,0.0017465709,0.00029113403,0.0003938459,0.003454545,0.0014011384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007912115,0.00067139714,0.0008367778,0.0048652417,0.035487533,0.02300172,0.0048941625,0.011881571,0.008106384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012191352,0.0006367247,0.0012808442,0.0042596767,0.041995086,0.009393295,0.0065244897,0.013325725,0.00058051734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007210671,0.00000879627,0.0005115812,0.000030832805,0.0000034120685,0.00013581567,0.0062317085,0.00016784246,0.00008698622,0.97741765,0.009483688,0.0059144846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004880371,0.000044159326,0.0046431734,0.00061624584,0.000050802697,0.00036092367,0.024948642,0.001930229,0.000259467,0.33401105,0.6328773,0.00020928703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98334783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99002683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1823954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1823954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22727373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9483054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2512505817","doi":"","title":"Online Liberty: Freedom of Expression in the Information Age","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Cyberspace; Jurisprudence; Scrutiny; Charter; Context (archaeology); Law; Sociology; Freedom of the press; Expression (computer science); Citizen journalism; Freedom of information; Social media; Political science; The Internet; Computer science","score_opus":0.04741096932963577,"score_gpt":0.34097948900723585,"score_spread":0.29356851967760006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2512505817","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026147941,0.0067016636,0.033120383,0.040064104,0.00047102,0.00007058864,0.00026238072,0.00013020984,0.8930318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8894044,0.0033343772,0.008466477,0.0074765747,0.00063159363,0.00018865714,0.00021766739,0.00008752872,0.09019269],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99294585,0.0022111107,0.00029999865,0.0008171897,0.0024244129,0.0013014915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99432904,0.0029638459,0.00034232755,0.0012995241,0.00061724207,0.0004480567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007518515,0.0004058391,0.00058994995,0.0012336351,0.008155724,0.015891492,0.0014494025,0.005809438,0.007458525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0108668385,0.00025584124,0.0005859472,0.0012483763,0.053573478,0.009821079,0.009301106,0.005085868,0.0012269217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057536645,0.000004124786,0.00008065537,0.000009752986,0.000001278489,0.00002807608,0.0021564714,0.00007914681,0.00007111067,0.9916317,0.0012043666,0.004727519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013917425,0.000018242108,0.00076809095,0.00015715297,0.000009774769,0.00013122786,0.0021035378,0.00028419585,0.00049199397,0.79468817,0.2013086,0.000025164289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054012105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041913066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054012105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008838373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012240496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10739547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2515154138","doi":"","title":"Taking the Risk out of Termination: An Enterprise Risk Management Analysis of the Normative System of Employment Standards Challenged by Honda v Keays","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Normative; Bad faith; Misconduct; Jurisprudence; Damages; Supreme court; Law; Labour law; Sociology; Reflexivity; Risk management; Power (physics); Law and economics; Business; Economics; Political science; Management","score_opus":0.04137045731393904,"score_gpt":0.2589071898184129,"score_spread":0.21753673250447383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2515154138","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54836696,0.0019622075,0.040788125,0.05638975,0.00009966166,0.00016488018,0.000088240115,0.00008403975,0.3520561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932045,0.00021668061,0.0013458561,0.00091009395,0.000036795518,0.000017235632,0.0000064995465,0.000007806921,0.004254592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98876417,0.0025635543,0.00025604773,0.0009307807,0.0043988214,0.0030866934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944792,0.0021849754,0.00095951604,0.00043515774,0.0014675801,0.00047353937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00821515,0.00032627615,0.00043629154,0.0019121023,0.007215528,0.011333154,0.0027308722,0.0054995324,0.0016538374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0093017435,0.00033352608,0.00088123366,0.0008483859,0.020034935,0.0042989594,0.0038360532,0.0059780544,0.00016436433],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012290471,0.000038733055,0.0017900942,0.000009360715,0.0000069025527,0.00024071551,0.00426373,0.002103835,0.00026542167,0.987033,0.00079672755,0.0034391824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041152147,0.000095300944,0.010841015,0.00020080233,0.00007436853,0.00016731562,0.012526124,0.02028493,0.0011790321,0.9257487,0.028710438,0.0001308072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22946638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1982362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22946638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031510465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025348669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45626146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2516282538","doi":"","title":"The Patentability of Human Embryonic Stem Cells: Is the Inconsistent Application of the European Union Biotechnology Directive’s Moral Exclusion Clause Undermining Investor Confidence in Europe, Providing a Competitive Advantage to the United States?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Directive; Patentability; European union; European commission; Legislation; Parliament; Convention; Law; Commission; Political science; Biotechnology; Business; International trade; Intellectual property; Biology; Politics; Patent law","score_opus":0.13142182781151915,"score_gpt":0.2663411164857857,"score_spread":0.13491928867426653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2516282538","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.082858436,0.052240368,0.006743856,0.69316095,0.0032221575,0.000042602296,0.000121622885,0.00003373991,0.16157627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81956303,0.02737603,0.002146055,0.13408166,0.0033946186,0.00006764771,0.00011239528,0.00003771019,0.013220916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98161733,0.006399413,0.001067277,0.0024543998,0.006650679,0.0018108806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93413126,0.05364989,0.0050333445,0.0016774854,0.004416409,0.0010916335],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028673923,0.0002683856,0.0007267147,0.0016256194,0.0037662294,0.015467073,0.0019341876,0.01699231,0.0028470843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08312416,0.00046599685,0.0008258283,0.001932487,0.02667398,0.014775047,0.0035046942,0.011522967,0.00074376666],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079836565,0.000063285675,0.0022474187,0.00014925821,0.000016642409,0.00042231492,0.003811924,0.0001716075,0.0004253334,0.91417074,0.025548631,0.05289306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005714487,0.00009347555,0.008003185,0.0011940732,0.000049207585,0.0005611192,0.005728915,0.0007046417,0.001680589,0.7867432,0.19510612,0.00007826593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007326651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043314095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99623376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062725176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074039144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15164399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2516859696","doi":"","title":"Sex Trafficking from Thailand to Japan: Human Beings or Illegal Goods?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Sex trafficking; Human trafficking; Scope (computer science); Human rights; Law; Order (exchange); Criminology; Business; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04094101819058774,"score_gpt":0.34267024339086244,"score_spread":0.3017292252002747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2516859696","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43936902,0.043056305,0.0023621155,0.1608624,0.0014443966,0.00006360526,0.0001413469,0.00003864268,0.3526622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9409932,0.024953648,0.00065357646,0.0067560226,0.00044957193,0.000023726998,0.000044511296,0.000020095978,0.026105676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934393,0.00034224993,0.00003074186,0.000044937202,0.00010285325,0.00013532356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990219,0.00039597327,0.00022947267,0.00006660646,0.00013561126,0.00015043002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008940277,0.00022265084,0.00019591812,0.0007507932,0.0042766104,0.0050504818,0.00030663135,0.0017703723,0.006690439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015982122,0.00015397939,0.00012216014,0.0008261679,0.0147863515,0.004583435,0.0017474755,0.001176143,0.00038024088],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006144635,0.0000943947,0.016209947,0.00070542016,0.000015717347,0.0062916535,0.39015785,0.00018080311,0.0009784509,0.46452937,0.025245486,0.095529385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009681654,0.00011268299,0.01681726,0.0017044548,0.000028546774,0.0035045424,0.6379676,0.00026426214,0.00072720036,0.045597002,0.29321963,0.000047027133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028757839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039642353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028757839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019557162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039425013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05718088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2517440738","doi":"","title":"Risk v Benefits: The Use of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors in Children","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Sertraline; Escitalopram; Citalopram; Fluoxetine; Anxiety; Paroxetine; Psychiatry; Fluvoxamine; Depression (economics); Antidepressant; Childhood Depression; Psychology; Anxiety disorder; Medicine; Internal medicine; Serotonin","score_opus":0.0705143720072083,"score_gpt":0.28764234834421987,"score_spread":0.21712797633701159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2517440738","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14164308,0.14502132,0.004640035,0.2756534,0.0062359795,0.00038420458,0.005039182,0.0002631553,0.4211196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7855526,0.10063152,0.0084652165,0.060232516,0.006152732,0.00032979198,0.0020853058,0.00018742925,0.036362763],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997523,0.00067539077,0.00017391035,0.00016196967,0.0010418005,0.00042390212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964748,0.0012040292,0.00083026686,0.00009477592,0.00065079017,0.00074534875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020086465,0.00032874942,0.00035994966,0.00091241027,0.0012659294,0.0021135763,0.00045690368,0.001585014,0.018222716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012897615,0.0002311639,0.000728747,0.00088236167,0.0010275485,0.002077746,0.0019571725,0.0033521468,0.0013559659],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006406864,0.00026044747,0.23180713,0.0017820807,0.00028439207,0.0035995105,0.003489025,0.0003031388,0.00065164984,0.066210896,0.20754163,0.48342946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022601134,0.00047185784,0.19231316,0.009334783,0.00066130713,0.021813877,0.0076990123,0.0003987458,0.001017006,0.028785048,0.7371434,0.00013577407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014245676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018222716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024176615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045395284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060961068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2524336399","doi":"","title":"Individual Activity & Content Neutrality Under Section 2(d) of the Charter","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Neutrality; Scope (computer science); Law and economics; Normative; Common law; Sociology; Relevance (law); Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.09898911144550165,"score_gpt":0.27871528089371994,"score_spread":0.1797261694482183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2524336399","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017900657,0.0015334986,0.03200235,0.03549531,0.0014048528,0.00040801457,0.00052869186,0.00024816205,0.9104785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.663069,0.0013602728,0.031811595,0.041793972,0.0018989518,0.00134979,0.0004643777,0.00016787654,0.25808418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9817492,0.003423833,0.0009824837,0.0025705125,0.008144949,0.0031289773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931263,0.002948689,0.00049413205,0.0013347459,0.001632831,0.00046329547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01151166,0.0005794026,0.0007219954,0.0007832514,0.00515724,0.011796606,0.0022297495,0.012807719,0.0051513133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016755432,0.0005837287,0.0014273926,0.0005939252,0.013879583,0.004085657,0.003254709,0.0089924885,0.0025795286],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008713826,0.000012368366,0.00018131727,0.000014271518,0.000001977437,0.00005093272,0.0007555582,0.00013618893,0.00016284593,0.9883034,0.0076889866,0.0026834204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059883885,0.00014507699,0.0018104258,0.0003780534,0.00003065163,0.00034667144,0.0011526718,0.0011603223,0.0017755359,0.555425,0.43757188,0.00014381092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055734415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0647056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055734415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007074516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024657834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.110820055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2524468930","doi":"","title":"Of Mice and \"Man\": Patentability of Genetic Material and the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Patentability; Intellectual property; Property (philosophy); Relation (database); Law and economics; Law; Political science; Business; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Patent law; Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07132463815187216,"score_gpt":0.23111638168892676,"score_spread":0.1597917435370546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2524468930","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.088045314,0.0645447,0.061037082,0.21018644,0.0024166713,0.00009858631,0.00030547226,0.00029262493,0.57307315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86555994,0.02200995,0.016396282,0.03522676,0.0012633258,0.00012914969,0.00006938465,0.00008131996,0.05926377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966505,0.001747761,0.00011222367,0.00038264072,0.00079675665,0.00031013147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944246,0.00320482,0.00095303135,0.0008446934,0.00032621535,0.00024669716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075596017,0.00043225285,0.0005457443,0.0010043761,0.0019297245,0.005592027,0.00077344204,0.003239575,0.0060899146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0088770585,0.00025195192,0.00044303597,0.00072300894,0.029078705,0.0068118083,0.0020621489,0.004148725,0.0005597974],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052303298,0.00000989337,0.00066859054,0.000041965883,0.000009646189,0.00011931971,0.00097638066,0.00008997306,0.0007972833,0.97866994,0.002903498,0.015661113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033987457,0.00014216908,0.0040896735,0.00033083704,0.000036863283,0.0007625873,0.0012243714,0.0003674712,0.0025100498,0.74081415,0.24964592,0.00004197099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010209372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015239309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010209372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030743275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003924061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039979458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527722782","doi":"","title":"The (Comic) Tragedy of Formalism in Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Natural law; Comics; Hypocrisy; Natural (archaeology); Comedy; English law; Literature; Jurisprudence; Sociology; Philosophy; History; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.029604800040771553,"score_gpt":0.32042208436345887,"score_spread":0.29081728432268733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2527722782","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14965662,0.005524641,0.0032610898,0.019769235,0.0006909101,0.00002047543,0.00004219278,0.0000630354,0.82097167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9044524,0.0006024454,0.00028307876,0.0012677057,0.000082500745,0.000008764992,0.00001003741,0.00003891555,0.09325413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987675,0.00065016287,0.000025532829,0.0001171845,0.00023094095,0.000208713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993832,0.0002917684,0.000042183172,0.0000659107,0.00010782014,0.00010911804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012108675,0.00018400094,0.00020387299,0.0004851336,0.0061778035,0.0051083197,0.00039286935,0.0011650604,0.0029284202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023129298,0.00019326237,0.000111081434,0.0003358142,0.01637377,0.0016370151,0.0017376712,0.0026810393,0.0004264424],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025148618,0.000010931371,0.0004423996,0.000030157282,0.0000032428438,0.000348483,0.03513805,0.00019830048,0.0002250951,0.937507,0.017991498,0.0080797225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018945362,0.000059801594,0.0036331136,0.00031093214,0.0000091116435,0.000425569,0.029999511,0.0004955899,0.0012960809,0.11934422,0.8443454,0.00006177492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051112413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08669385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051112413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041818167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027022515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10162979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527736621","doi":"","title":"Defining the Protected Groups in the Law of Genocide: Learning from the Experience of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Genocide; Tribunal; Law; International law; Crimes against humanity; Political science; Criminal law; Sociology; War crime; Criminology","score_opus":0.035426949917973766,"score_gpt":0.3293822217876631,"score_spread":0.2939552718696893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2527736621","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2412653,0.0617486,0.01050354,0.48911175,0.0055274,0.00015510262,0.00006344937,0.00007319183,0.1915517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88277906,0.03827519,0.0048960443,0.03418354,0.0016597732,0.00014402527,0.00007191027,0.00022744606,0.037763037],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99001455,0.007887172,0.00014839087,0.00031839046,0.0005785036,0.0010530294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991154,0.006335162,0.00056316576,0.00036032713,0.00065683713,0.000930628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012699112,0.0008862477,0.00049058656,0.0013003468,0.019197134,0.011681581,0.002190857,0.005901508,0.0031882368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017675849,0.000714844,0.0004241776,0.0011108123,0.03156793,0.02020814,0.009099795,0.016321614,0.0009895321],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000242443,0.000068108195,0.0014636369,0.00018579666,0.0000058517535,0.00071902777,0.8410971,0.00014877801,0.0004382922,0.08465315,0.037245307,0.033950772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009141569,0.000082010054,0.0018178066,0.0012269692,0.00000861302,0.00074328086,0.6261767,0.00011690522,0.0004357297,0.022656009,0.3466853,0.000041551906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013001692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031102076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019197134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007119338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066499836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06716013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528019720","doi":"","title":"Risky Business: A Review of Dual Class Share Structures in Canada and a Proposal for Reform","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shareholder; Corporation; Common stock; Corporate governance; Equity (law); Institutional investor; Corporate structure; Voting; Accounting; Business; Corporate law; Agency cost; Dual (grammatical number); Finance; Economics; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.05390135005255746,"score_gpt":0.2931138911210068,"score_spread":0.2392125410684493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528019720","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003119631,0.9163114,0.0004750431,0.053434085,0.0015777099,0.000041389783,0.00021740329,0.000021316242,0.024802063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05393033,0.91760164,0.00095157244,0.020970589,0.0011030826,0.00004873075,0.00020019755,0.00002896932,0.005164842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99349374,0.00056631665,0.0003578844,0.0005359493,0.003835049,0.0012111311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.979736,0.0047398238,0.0013538772,0.00038553498,0.0111413915,0.002643414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006646179,0.00070349727,0.0013659501,0.011836996,0.006510691,0.008908592,0.0038014015,0.0045800973,0.0039013806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018277366,0.00058945455,0.0010530504,0.02235407,0.012482138,0.004438099,0.0023209464,0.004461936,0.0003836727],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082489714,0.000109726934,0.0050460384,0.008421814,0.00008819254,0.0006706789,0.0051288833,0.00095318095,0.00031804002,0.39896315,0.18959275,0.39062506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000211617,0.000029949124,0.015983641,0.013824585,0.00008341629,0.0002715549,0.0023585712,0.0003261821,0.00013278818,0.011907175,0.9549801,0.00008091294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97010404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9763821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1591931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1591931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32130364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9752168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528086873","doi":"","title":"What’s in a Name? The Feasibility and Desirability of Naming Forced Marriage as a Separate Crime Under International Humanitarian Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Phenomenon; Law; Forced marriage; Forced migration; Sierra leone; Sociology; International humanitarian law; Face (sociological concept); Criminology; Political science; International law; Refugee; Social science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05770563033119879,"score_gpt":0.37992582927932245,"score_spread":0.32222019894812365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528086873","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13571599,0.019226164,0.02414062,0.6152543,0.013741401,0.00017209427,0.00009750367,0.000123821,0.19152811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87816006,0.0056082937,0.007689579,0.09220497,0.0048983423,0.00023996328,0.000056707453,0.0001298486,0.01101234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93680865,0.044320077,0.002577983,0.004633118,0.008892707,0.0027675584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9222444,0.05054324,0.009062295,0.0055855387,0.010160154,0.0024043934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.044734176,0.00070538773,0.0012507781,0.0021231237,0.015152822,0.019900713,0.0044177766,0.015022873,0.0027002478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12326959,0.00054318254,0.0007972064,0.0016941783,0.07436048,0.028112518,0.010455876,0.016445138,0.0008371734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044038785,0.000048403275,0.005119521,0.0003287166,0.000027570544,0.0006192908,0.08131536,0.00014962516,0.00039845097,0.8721836,0.01266614,0.027099323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004104531,0.00025552648,0.0076396423,0.0043906663,0.00013047046,0.002847622,0.24544136,0.0014335358,0.0020669645,0.31503356,0.42039964,0.00031995474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014678779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014640297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044734176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005687773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009070034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23657978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528344651","doi":"","title":"Employee Drug Testing: Orwellian Vision or Pragmatic Approach to Problems in the Workforce","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Human rights; Law; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Legislation; Political science; Civil liberties; Charter; Legitimacy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.0695673268313307,"score_gpt":0.3514494775894099,"score_spread":0.2818821507580792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528344651","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026979428,0.010365026,0.0077723023,0.8916558,0.0016342578,0.00006172208,0.000028591692,0.00003423616,0.085750096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35954124,0.0116852475,0.014919172,0.5448855,0.0057826587,0.00045060096,0.000035695495,0.00009240165,0.06260751],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854482,0.0075248717,0.00046443488,0.0016618607,0.0029322552,0.0019684127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99193656,0.0046714987,0.0004671283,0.0004112605,0.0011363006,0.0013773794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016560188,0.00086364197,0.000872378,0.0025541212,0.013180247,0.012892389,0.003591742,0.027355859,0.004556412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013989998,0.00044211012,0.0007398799,0.001494947,0.08778514,0.013091002,0.008858832,0.01804387,0.0005665419],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004891971,0.000028430026,0.00015718403,0.00004655812,0.0000022601885,0.00010281822,0.00273658,0.000078339195,0.000050541545,0.9713019,0.020399556,0.0050908667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032805958,0.000043002787,0.00035557238,0.0004689779,0.0000074391232,0.00020163333,0.00711134,0.00046399535,0.000085145024,0.7593576,0.23184112,0.000031460248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.088305466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09888845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.088305466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027828347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046003044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20190978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528975407","doi":"","title":"The Role of Dignity in Canadian and South African Gender Equality Jurisprudence","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Jurisprudence; Jurisdiction; Disadvantage; Law; Sociology; Gender equality; Political science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.055525963570154956,"score_gpt":0.33650898016338376,"score_spread":0.28098301659322883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528975407","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10398036,0.059468623,0.007223925,0.2185762,0.0019050302,0.00014691033,0.0001454259,0.000042987118,0.60851055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9496184,0.010844738,0.0030103694,0.015783247,0.00014844975,0.000056622477,0.000027883574,0.000033788714,0.020476505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9832704,0.003598751,0.0006139154,0.0013894708,0.007012174,0.004115276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98594946,0.0071257153,0.00061700575,0.0004366445,0.0043989876,0.001472135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013888384,0.00055429834,0.0009192803,0.0053413003,0.03488421,0.01291998,0.002425146,0.006445613,0.003273001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028299358,0.000519897,0.0006538707,0.0040122992,0.058220226,0.0057735234,0.007994652,0.0088545205,0.0001752282],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018877467,0.0000063014336,0.0009121063,0.00012960796,0.0000080297505,0.00036904548,0.037505593,0.00013282584,0.00023717049,0.9412066,0.0031223306,0.01635159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004402367,0.000051396975,0.011267695,0.0031853074,0.000095870935,0.000813318,0.086433664,0.00056450284,0.0013587967,0.263182,0.6327239,0.00027950422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.919198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9485205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.122753024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.122753024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12463644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89063966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529238904","doi":"","title":"Pulling the Ivy Out of the Windows: Presumptions of Privacy in the Home and R. v. Gomboc","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Expectation of privacy; Charter; Order (exchange); State (computer science); Search and seizure; Privacy law; Power (physics); Sociology; Business; Political science; Privacy policy; Law enforcement; Supreme court; Information privacy; Computer science","score_opus":0.06641061789450314,"score_gpt":0.3639180378415194,"score_spread":0.29750741994701624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529238904","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06146384,0.012730831,0.004671739,0.110332794,0.00060993433,0.00010272205,0.00022047338,0.00009591153,0.8097718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8542441,0.0026352908,0.0016233915,0.05320067,0.00021576569,0.00010067978,0.000048852577,0.000049836068,0.08788135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99564654,0.0008723685,0.00009557192,0.00043374326,0.0012839647,0.0016677493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981748,0.0008495669,0.00009358918,0.00016954861,0.00048220146,0.00023032214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024745916,0.0002864474,0.0004222725,0.00071007805,0.014508044,0.00889315,0.0018227979,0.009743274,0.0031629347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007981634,0.0004297888,0.00058943743,0.0006875572,0.018028133,0.0029638868,0.0029528206,0.0075609577,0.00044080854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000144489,0.000005151575,0.00023057229,0.0000131562,0.00000325984,0.00030258595,0.002847329,0.00016565138,0.00005214933,0.98131555,0.013050365,0.0019997233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007056775,0.00005631498,0.004170514,0.0009124855,0.0000669021,0.00047340567,0.0139797535,0.0018388248,0.00085853593,0.5373143,0.44012195,0.00013645961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8092948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7998736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19070518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028108936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035895728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3836565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529607162","doi":"","title":"Uncertain Territory: Family Reunification and the Plight of Unaccompanied Minors in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Migration, Health and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Family reunification; Refugee; Immigration; Legislation; Law; Scope (computer science); Political science; Convention; Best interests; Immigration law; Minor (academic); Convention on the Rights of the Child; Family law; Criminology; Sociology; Human rights","score_opus":0.03172936707329431,"score_gpt":0.31901654832073834,"score_spread":0.287287181247444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529607162","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97642356,0.0008458089,0.000059142247,0.009470275,0.000063283755,0.000017875438,0.000052332904,0.0000038355856,0.013063777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99628323,0.00055757235,0.000035256064,0.0005384443,0.0000067245414,0.000002920828,0.0000146534985,0.0000023263387,0.0025587874],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846125,0.00018043311,0.000033311135,0.00008659043,0.00021669905,0.0010216896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976555,0.0002082507,0.00032960437,0.00005057694,0.0004559358,0.0013000944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009573874,0.0001893473,0.000329559,0.00080221164,0.023284018,0.0029650934,0.0015052812,0.0010962151,0.003530697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036409153,0.00020038245,0.00024580056,0.001104474,0.006921659,0.0010156778,0.0034538372,0.0023372765,0.00010374494],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000119254,0.00015988064,0.25740048,0.0001023278,0.00003532946,0.0070387716,0.63939613,0.00041528276,0.0006720126,0.032295793,0.015893416,0.046471313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001108876,0.00005464241,0.11379985,0.00019505597,0.000016871327,0.0013941822,0.85273975,0.00023058467,0.0001620804,0.0014939301,0.029855108,0.00004693135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9804598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99450713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04865443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04865443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.066542335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35301423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529612912","doi":"","title":"When All Else Fails, Blame the Parents: An Analysis of Parental Responsibility Laws in Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Blame; Juvenile delinquency; Economic Justice; Law; Criminology; Poverty; Moral responsibility; Political science; Legal responsibility; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.043616866470318885,"score_gpt":0.3376268931768372,"score_spread":0.2940100267065183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529612912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93284804,0.0026142013,0.00027511537,0.0060697575,0.000045805442,0.00020952639,0.0011628405,0.000019065179,0.056755643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907782,0.0020802654,0.00021773358,0.0007829605,0.000009167442,0.00002894757,0.0004710506,0.00001474456,0.0056168186],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99268156,0.0004117934,0.0001924442,0.00029077055,0.0031865782,0.0032368908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98475665,0.002751893,0.0021402463,0.00033952057,0.0072658663,0.0027457403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021317312,0.00031450333,0.0004830716,0.0048214598,0.01798462,0.004722857,0.002360175,0.0015500048,0.0040327115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0156132355,0.00044804366,0.00070649746,0.009605699,0.0034862857,0.000916635,0.0020214375,0.0024728007,0.00020170205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021215214,0.0004307377,0.68880457,0.00026669313,0.00015879433,0.0037323113,0.12871644,0.0026806027,0.0005152277,0.08375745,0.030378371,0.060346715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033443972,0.000050205632,0.8108064,0.00040570748,0.00012177006,0.00038184054,0.13251413,0.0022995004,0.00028218608,0.0016698777,0.051333927,0.0001010064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9981165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99897397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15124692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15124692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20961106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9844333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2530070683","doi":"","title":"Consultations Under the WTO's Dispute Settlement System","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Negotiation; Plaintiff; Alternative dispute resolution; Dispute board; Settlement (finance); Law; Dispute mechanism; Order (exchange); Respondent; Element (criminal law); Political science; Scope (computer science); Law and economics; Online dispute resolution; Business; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.025136383867939174,"score_gpt":0.31508902134992745,"score_spread":0.2899526374819883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2530070683","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.069042824,0.0055906954,0.111633584,0.15230161,0.001984278,0.0009502515,0.00052044116,0.000403006,0.6575732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8789751,0.0025213284,0.03591874,0.018356316,0.0011427095,0.00084147096,0.0001933366,0.000093664865,0.061957307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9232195,0.046127383,0.0036423155,0.0030855718,0.018804533,0.0051206583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97398746,0.017005742,0.0028690144,0.0018601784,0.0030284026,0.0012491839],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030571915,0.0003886961,0.0006907699,0.0010297755,0.012054143,0.01137122,0.0020083867,0.010396214,0.006339913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042276222,0.00050309335,0.00057421153,0.002204598,0.013892211,0.006696717,0.009444169,0.008243716,0.0013268795],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050186933,0.000024059915,0.0005372549,0.00012771173,0.000010062171,0.000618688,0.010201216,0.0010101548,0.0013162978,0.94674367,0.01687859,0.022482134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001087773,0.00012949249,0.002835329,0.0007290622,0.00003559336,0.0011598062,0.01011315,0.0047964235,0.0020370602,0.4344014,0.54344773,0.00020613289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011887893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011798868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030571915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008585551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017892508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16168171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2530321078","doi":"","title":"Dual Citizenship and Forced Marriages","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Gender and Women's Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Law; Politics; Dual (grammatical number); International law; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Human rights; Phenomenon; Power (physics); Political science; Forced migration; Forced marriage","score_opus":0.055876296664376365,"score_gpt":0.3436201593320794,"score_spread":0.287743862667703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2530321078","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8089426,0.0029333043,0.0029932072,0.017829921,0.00030343732,0.000023224115,0.000038548766,0.000017824828,0.16691782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957709,0.00029198438,0.00012012856,0.0003707244,0.000029176266,0.0000074881204,0.000005390868,0.0000025914753,0.0034016648],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99593604,0.001850537,0.00012959188,0.00037401647,0.0005437202,0.0011660387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99704933,0.0010061358,0.0006689726,0.00023691107,0.00020929892,0.00082931435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024043566,0.00015309484,0.0003503616,0.0010958988,0.0053560818,0.003196212,0.0005536162,0.0016031021,0.005570958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077436934,0.00018246783,0.0002609312,0.00060749607,0.021029424,0.0030061575,0.008567812,0.0019861062,0.0002469318],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003445833,0.00007963234,0.018264541,0.00003624396,0.000008155073,0.0019458465,0.11726353,0.00008098964,0.00018339233,0.8363118,0.0020438856,0.023747416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004663162,0.00015708468,0.025946265,0.00053443154,0.000027907274,0.008329452,0.2550112,0.0007455184,0.0005922527,0.56645113,0.14209196,0.00006613899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005134518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063876575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005570958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014261636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020228117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018636703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2530534243","doi":"","title":"Vaccine-Related Injuries: Why Canada Needs to Adopt a No-Fault Compensation Scheme in Light of the New H1N1 Vaccine","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Vaccination; Government (linguistics); Immunization; Damages; Human mortality from H5N1; Tort; Public health; Medicine; Political science; Virology; Law; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Immunology; Liability; Disease","score_opus":0.023681910565207954,"score_gpt":0.3616817524081455,"score_spread":0.3379998418429375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2530534243","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017575385,0.008204623,0.00046682483,0.93522364,0.0041957363,0.00014654371,0.0005662423,0.00012353594,0.03349752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17817335,0.012310232,0.0022147538,0.78048766,0.0014166214,0.000106170286,0.0007447531,0.00021724871,0.024329232],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898039,0.0008815246,0.00037905347,0.00069163623,0.0038241465,0.004419762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9595462,0.0023355384,0.0011345407,0.0006939407,0.01943292,0.016856845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066750464,0.00044937478,0.0006379086,0.0013055196,0.019892145,0.008749271,0.004751595,0.010561989,0.018160103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025927,0.0006363195,0.0010008009,0.0022057102,0.006459492,0.004655647,0.004618457,0.013809884,0.0016375412],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013404136,0.00021632011,0.037251666,0.00035891155,0.00007357936,0.0010082219,0.0024730947,0.00038245326,0.0007198352,0.022219779,0.8214645,0.11369758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021412552,0.00020197158,0.07458574,0.0023276268,0.00013281022,0.00084585615,0.0123019,0.0007807299,0.0005432288,0.008093881,0.89966387,0.0003083097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9806995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9921085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9110821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08891793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29792038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6451478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2530544408","doi":"","title":"Restoring and Maintaining Order in Complex Peace Operations: The Search for a Legal Framework","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); Law; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Business","score_opus":0.1044289737148858,"score_gpt":0.40983316635235156,"score_spread":0.30540419263746577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2530544408","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014078136,0.7609373,0.004918812,0.11152555,0.0020975831,0.000035361765,0.00004832343,0.000037003363,0.1189923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08690448,0.85932785,0.0052040075,0.012951175,0.0056421375,0.00010149427,0.00008550849,0.00006144261,0.029721832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969894,0.0012729554,0.00015532326,0.00019623036,0.0011284989,0.00025755944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99552023,0.0030889357,0.00036031782,0.00015752653,0.00065596326,0.00021708559],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004680703,0.0005836836,0.000798926,0.0026823145,0.0032054696,0.009855177,0.0017413219,0.005981844,0.0047191307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056791045,0.00044288608,0.00035295912,0.003744216,0.023818394,0.014532274,0.0025416175,0.005820258,0.0013002737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073959795,0.00001665172,0.00008459425,0.00056578655,0.000007218454,0.00009187314,0.0013846598,0.0011388287,0.000052014817,0.85116553,0.08276042,0.06272511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010426712,0.000020627374,0.0004914256,0.002448827,0.0000068795857,0.00015039006,0.0022258824,0.00038678877,0.000074571835,0.37190765,0.6222523,0.000024213348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018310184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026060026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018310184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00782596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014371734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05678153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531009826","doi":"","title":"The Practice of Principle: In Defense of a Pragmatist Approach to Legal Theory","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03918575256515755,"score_gpt":0.379507126859882,"score_spread":0.3403213742947245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531009826","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002579884,0.33127627,0.072281204,0.37755904,0.0077893124,0.000116805866,0.00007417973,0.00010108821,0.20822233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31106272,0.3488549,0.07876837,0.11604191,0.040988576,0.0015702735,0.00023605803,0.0004959599,0.1019812],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9795965,0.012972372,0.0007781181,0.0011229108,0.0047751684,0.0007550555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98250157,0.013636331,0.0009953782,0.0009553388,0.0015899728,0.0003213609],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01840707,0.0008792136,0.0015548037,0.003666383,0.004169268,0.010208067,0.0035435474,0.009347276,0.0030772064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023740938,0.0006765804,0.0010493381,0.0044029215,0.053409237,0.022022897,0.0044872384,0.012653131,0.0018027965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003402966,0.0000040666346,0.000020667678,0.00008561247,0.0000024283793,0.000019749259,0.00070138177,0.00009093831,0.000015746475,0.98082584,0.012724976,0.0055050934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008695488,0.000012579494,0.000081835766,0.00035924115,0.0000028309976,0.000062283674,0.00042931002,0.00018988828,0.000040147796,0.85837376,0.14043094,0.000008407614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047591394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045811622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01840707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065184836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010646492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09734702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531384980","doi":"","title":"Mediation: Principles, Process, Practice (Canadian Edition)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Process (computing); Sociology; Political science; Law; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.028163035938826783,"score_gpt":0.28161693436902974,"score_spread":0.25345389843020294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531384980","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044910813,0.47658756,0.008896621,0.020279042,0.005034178,0.00027738023,0.0018672122,0.0004920526,0.48611677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022180682,0.45105916,0.014314542,0.006028374,0.002299955,0.0004278475,0.0017750409,0.0003827246,0.50153166],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962528,0.0005483624,0.00018086021,0.0002839589,0.0023092818,0.00042470123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99771833,0.0005211263,0.00010935053,0.00015919698,0.0012968767,0.00019516551],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030116946,0.0012692466,0.001175644,0.0030741245,0.004464521,0.0070127486,0.002408716,0.0032065685,0.068607286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005478313,0.0008891709,0.0008452266,0.007836383,0.004947178,0.005207552,0.0025579252,0.002951831,0.023679508],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021054264,0.00002011368,0.00016128807,0.0010755497,0.000011494449,0.0001249644,0.0010036697,0.00039275305,0.00019668305,0.068580754,0.7685799,0.1598318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029893804,0.000005010951,0.00020712799,0.00047094366,0.000005350311,0.0000815389,0.00020685478,0.000029844483,0.000055375083,0.008269755,0.99065536,0.000009724002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46344867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5292782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46344867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020679587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.057664596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92150223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2534225366","doi":"","title":"Canadian Health Law & Policy","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.07395744038177174,"score_gpt":0.47019743639727407,"score_spread":0.3962399960155023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2534225366","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003253412,0.061795827,0.0003225643,0.08178005,0.007151769,0.00015111077,0.00663987,0.00025922328,0.8415742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0088084815,0.041211877,0.00096614595,0.01693707,0.0012496337,0.000112650916,0.0027045605,0.0001408264,0.9278687],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99687296,0.00015193915,0.00006226394,0.00020006986,0.0021813514,0.0005314411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971528,0.00017911247,0.000049145994,0.00010391109,0.0020338362,0.0004812208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015260595,0.0009709709,0.00070616364,0.0047387346,0.0073276917,0.007373154,0.0017996252,0.0045469403,0.1297897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050927056,0.00071185146,0.000605819,0.0074509857,0.0023631824,0.0015651388,0.0012738694,0.0022085547,0.02347918],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015105444,0.0000025353372,0.000042178766,0.000051300747,0.0000011994659,0.0000096533195,0.00004113754,0.000028477918,0.00000983615,0.011518399,0.9776883,0.010605431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014957828,9.661701e-7,0.00037750168,0.00008667741,0.0000015586436,0.000006451318,0.000060093305,0.000017069651,0.000006432267,0.00092908717,0.9985078,0.0000048122965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9775441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98876405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91565824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.084341794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18580389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6119454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2545063720","doi":"","title":"Developments in Canadian Adult Guardianship and Co-Decision-Making Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Legal guardian; Law; Autonomy; Political science; Legislation; Guardian; Paternalism; Sociology","score_opus":0.031002948268392703,"score_gpt":0.37726675423942974,"score_spread":0.346263805971037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2545063720","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08300807,0.031669665,0.008366282,0.122994654,0.0015888363,0.0002535053,0.0014893466,0.00026575924,0.75036377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7403721,0.020302529,0.0120540215,0.029864123,0.00051291136,0.0001169537,0.0006986129,0.000117590964,0.19596107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99194896,0.00066673756,0.00027730837,0.0010193358,0.0040585357,0.0020291246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881048,0.0017596392,0.00045173347,0.0003497087,0.0071259956,0.0022080673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048903385,0.0004819099,0.00033632232,0.0024758088,0.013045682,0.0064746942,0.0027871947,0.003071704,0.011856344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009443963,0.0003609319,0.00062828505,0.0034256328,0.011007361,0.0017453524,0.0027768407,0.0037178316,0.0005051435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029387938,0.00003064039,0.00680732,0.00016131322,0.00001387902,0.0005356303,0.014043097,0.00060843857,0.0002604232,0.85970986,0.06452178,0.053278267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012580073,0.00001629023,0.014444813,0.00033793485,0.000024034405,0.00019843936,0.003285336,0.00071129604,0.00020243699,0.014361561,0.9663272,0.00007816992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.996429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77801204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22198798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27729565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9023837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2546484979","doi":"","title":"(Un)Chained Wives: Understanding the Bruker v. Markovitz Decision, and Possible Alternative Legal Claims for Jewish Women Who Are Denied a Get","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judaism; Law; Wife; Jurisprudence; Economic Justice; Sociology; Doctrine; Hebrew; State (computer science); Intervention (counseling); Political science; Psychology; Theology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04250719309193344,"score_gpt":0.33053769948494455,"score_spread":0.2880305063930111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2546484979","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24573097,0.0033413472,0.012591096,0.13522121,0.00037977405,0.00010937868,0.00014063895,0.000048658523,0.6024369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9626368,0.00068073766,0.0011775814,0.01297742,0.00013357852,0.0000461107,0.000020127913,0.000014333336,0.022313204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998128,0.0006074392,0.00004168708,0.0002165253,0.00033475287,0.0006716766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983612,0.0010022413,0.00012250876,0.0000950046,0.00017120884,0.00024781367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003373685,0.00024377217,0.00030208274,0.0008257287,0.0097149145,0.0060317265,0.0014037082,0.0095861405,0.0060812565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007568396,0.00030790447,0.00048083294,0.0006398387,0.013457907,0.0037805154,0.0030801261,0.0063071405,0.00042644728],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013309312,0.0000062925183,0.00047743617,0.000003295659,0.0000020235245,0.00028931026,0.0016093968,0.00016376254,0.000046599514,0.99437153,0.0015739123,0.001443084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006832147,0.00004602266,0.0018948361,0.00015590407,0.000025545696,0.00038337387,0.008480211,0.0038656795,0.00037348774,0.92076284,0.06388263,0.00006118307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.113357365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19023678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88664263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077177673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074216602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22539508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2547489690","doi":"","title":"\"This is What the Others Have Done\": The Impact of Confederation on the Use of Precedent in Newfoundland Supreme Court Decisions From 1932-1958","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Dominion; Jurisdiction; Dominance (genetics); Political science; Context (archaeology); Common law; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.1572676411408118,"score_gpt":0.3686587613018798,"score_spread":0.211391120161068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2547489690","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8401964,0.0019757883,0.00018298236,0.022573145,0.00018806629,0.000033824548,0.00016667058,0.0000137132365,0.13466933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831581,0.0004905604,0.000064962944,0.00348726,0.00002632549,0.000012474919,0.00005687423,0.000007751055,0.012695519],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99351305,0.0011509404,0.00015636993,0.0005399346,0.0010896309,0.0035501362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98780406,0.0057967436,0.0011049683,0.0003125135,0.0030623595,0.0019192691],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004442477,0.00016516053,0.0002902004,0.0012357362,0.030729605,0.008890683,0.0019163286,0.0026315127,0.0033638538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017178906,0.00036754785,0.00033698414,0.001458916,0.0115881665,0.002527662,0.0030594624,0.004586739,0.00028705242],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045078716,0.00034626198,0.19252239,0.00017976602,0.00020009074,0.010446732,0.4937922,0.002665918,0.0022426578,0.1356955,0.08415562,0.077302136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004274188,0.00015370747,0.4563644,0.00069826836,0.00014334505,0.0005295153,0.3173318,0.00046765094,0.0018331639,0.0035344276,0.218643,0.00025815968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9729231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9898245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09429384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09429384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041892175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6841529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2548292026","doi":"","title":"Compelling War Correspondents to Testify: A Prerogative of International Criminal Tribunals?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Testimonial; Privilege (computing); Law; Tribunal; Witness; Political science; Legitimacy; Criminal procedure; Confidentiality; Sociology; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.04074360226860753,"score_gpt":0.3659157563073452,"score_spread":0.32517215403873767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2548292026","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2226818,0.0041926154,0.007649774,0.34110856,0.0039413823,0.00022358494,0.00003442127,0.00019871752,0.41996914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8757286,0.00068467786,0.0015179135,0.07851852,0.00083736464,0.00009236419,0.000017859229,0.000038522146,0.04256422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9835223,0.0046693096,0.00078110566,0.001846499,0.0025464671,0.006634449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9759218,0.012807657,0.0017648693,0.002695918,0.0025375078,0.004272282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016954456,0.00053274166,0.0006537327,0.0009506874,0.016540576,0.017936492,0.0028031534,0.023200415,0.007822933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050671674,0.0007876134,0.0007716369,0.0006454096,0.015166974,0.008591982,0.01370637,0.019416915,0.0013930127],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027394807,0.00043624223,0.013810313,0.00017920231,0.00006344261,0.006751763,0.07486539,0.00030689756,0.0060345675,0.73077744,0.07351444,0.09298637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016774426,0.0011804659,0.02727736,0.0010941211,0.00017769221,0.0041573904,0.121798806,0.0012701411,0.008259755,0.113222264,0.72098124,0.00041299828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011275766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023819828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023200415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030136614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010029044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08966476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2552407563","doi":"","title":"Governing the Sulphur Dioxide Emissions of Multinational Corporations: Putting the Breaks on the Race-to-the-Bottom","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Race to the bottom; Multinational corporation; Harm; Greenhouse gas; Race to the Top; Race (biology); Global warming; Corporate governance; Environmental law; State responsibility; Politics; Political science; Business; Law; Climate change; International law; Sociology; Globalization; Ecology","score_opus":0.03130295072663826,"score_gpt":0.3190632385508857,"score_spread":0.28776028782424745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2552407563","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10516424,0.017338924,0.021170856,0.5643647,0.0033625253,0.00007067918,0.00003502816,0.00006357472,0.28842956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.915621,0.008012693,0.0062753027,0.04715682,0.0011683458,0.000093869385,0.000023293916,0.0000789474,0.021569714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892757,0.0045383438,0.00031213436,0.0009519192,0.0028227093,0.0020991464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99021214,0.0050575538,0.0011119633,0.00064647995,0.0018687724,0.0011031232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015029826,0.00043891877,0.00056337996,0.0008102924,0.008645355,0.015699966,0.0021797097,0.011691384,0.005220081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015978176,0.00038615783,0.00088487734,0.0006206701,0.016044354,0.016804103,0.010113141,0.009411176,0.0006156971],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042202282,0.00007036334,0.0021944386,0.00018415331,0.00003458637,0.00035789656,0.011771967,0.0018284844,0.00078576314,0.9438457,0.010464803,0.02841963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032174958,0.00014405302,0.0029236327,0.0011760937,0.000053182077,0.0001208472,0.017911693,0.0034748942,0.0022407025,0.71910155,0.2527348,0.00008636594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01482983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017500462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015699966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006499526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016067231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07948631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2554554291","doi":"","title":"The Judge as Politician: Review of In Defense of a Political Court","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.033910931738621766,"score_gpt":0.3537553172220859,"score_spread":0.31984438548346417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2554554291","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004438963,0.9897704,0.00005357103,0.0062515177,0.0013771406,0.0000028081797,0.00002301615,0.0000021424753,0.002474959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015872148,0.98817635,0.00012521319,0.005390682,0.0028544876,0.000009245837,0.00005481387,0.0000074774025,0.0017946117],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964945,0.0011953262,0.00039169117,0.00025900488,0.0015070993,0.00015245903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870624,0.0067814146,0.0011346643,0.00022487798,0.0044224826,0.00037414703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004461178,0.00086860155,0.0016623876,0.009113064,0.00096582307,0.005286549,0.0016897186,0.0041826153,0.0056373226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016337201,0.00058713456,0.0004766072,0.012449818,0.0031759343,0.0041038464,0.0012030206,0.0037411812,0.0018707864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051108815,0.000024818248,0.0003542668,0.010801201,0.00010501019,0.0001046997,0.00034207583,0.00023911917,0.0001753997,0.024058959,0.72866756,0.2350758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000090616495,0.000017069817,0.000938125,0.0073010894,0.000052387346,0.00012546258,0.00017457636,0.000031180498,0.000046539648,0.0043316926,0.9869617,0.000010991629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019018494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048857387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019018494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005871709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016433641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04260248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592943669","doi":"","title":"The problems of false comparions: Animal discourse and the anti-choice movement.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Sociology; Personhood; Argument (complex analysis); Environmental ethics; Criminology; Politics; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03130030491597535,"score_gpt":0.2898265267274124,"score_spread":0.25852622181143703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592943669","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030032404,0.019605732,0.0033884947,0.7554711,0.0016293812,0.000022585049,0.000057255522,0.000041675772,0.18975137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83676904,0.0043392414,0.00227377,0.117388666,0.00118471,0.00008855894,0.000028264245,0.000086908854,0.037840843],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9818362,0.012142941,0.00027221174,0.0014025363,0.0029612104,0.0013849336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98055375,0.015807865,0.0007509527,0.0007612893,0.0015530258,0.00057315966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019649684,0.0005538173,0.0005548722,0.0016454151,0.026719822,0.014657056,0.0031652672,0.019639729,0.0045136306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02581021,0.00055424,0.0004799295,0.0015223701,0.1026985,0.011604786,0.006116952,0.013806397,0.00042027584],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011187036,0.0000060904235,0.00016047178,0.000020991863,0.000003881434,0.00013107971,0.04014288,0.000029090275,0.00006356083,0.9433975,0.01293571,0.0030974622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035098765,0.000023394156,0.0010675678,0.00045404094,0.000022644097,0.00020500273,0.066746034,0.0004006903,0.00049080607,0.5345007,0.39599705,0.000056979883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18105032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19386335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18105032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02608993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016071869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35999292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594295794","doi":"","title":"Who is harmed by fantasy? A deliberative and Charter analysis of Canada's pornography law.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Pornography; Law; Charter; Harm; Sociology; Legislation; Child pornography; Law enforcement; Criminal law; Political science; The Internet","score_opus":0.025567128618656405,"score_gpt":0.3228689394636592,"score_spread":0.2973018108450028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594295794","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24726051,0.003965961,0.010831714,0.10802387,0.00028250707,0.00020281516,0.0003366482,0.00007469611,0.6290212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9744768,0.0005778609,0.0012192837,0.0020154484,0.00002136505,0.00003011409,0.000039885257,0.000018929504,0.0216004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934267,0.0018287678,0.00012108501,0.00049012614,0.002472326,0.0016609979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992077,0.0039824336,0.0006865741,0.0003852522,0.0021569405,0.0007119595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004598733,0.00032442968,0.00029163546,0.0021710796,0.02645183,0.01223157,0.0016979979,0.003673924,0.0031875337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012488435,0.0003021729,0.00031790315,0.0022427144,0.03808282,0.0047845156,0.0038824622,0.004942216,0.00016055041],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065944905,0.000011180888,0.0016177027,0.000014950841,0.0000022885695,0.00019878773,0.06748687,0.00018049755,0.000063033636,0.91933656,0.0052759023,0.005805547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002189911,0.000023602717,0.015533979,0.00038161178,0.000032362503,0.000317961,0.25150803,0.002569084,0.0009897779,0.29680523,0.43171436,0.000102009406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94641054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9477959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08521444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08521444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08365286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61827695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594432468","doi":"","title":"Re Indalex: The confluence of pension, insolvency, and fiduciary law.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Insolvency; Duty; Law; Supreme court; Creditor; Pension; Business; Bankruptcy; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Finance; Debt","score_opus":0.051694270192047136,"score_gpt":0.3481389749984826,"score_spread":0.2964447048064355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594432468","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029013962,0.022285886,0.0023474644,0.15177958,0.0012714908,0.00009462204,0.00030510686,0.0001834688,0.7927184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.504154,0.005256068,0.0020937086,0.06242066,0.00046497287,0.000086129774,0.0001421864,0.00013323716,0.42524895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889965,0.000875397,0.00020621812,0.0011914877,0.005396967,0.0033333933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969606,0.0010791186,0.00017069202,0.00017854385,0.001091652,0.0005194904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031986253,0.0005176493,0.00047177568,0.0013306374,0.019579537,0.013223338,0.002360541,0.01242389,0.0058143176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008736308,0.00072092324,0.0005725441,0.0012408657,0.021414677,0.004051789,0.0038953514,0.010422709,0.00063610845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012349121,0.0000071798872,0.00056651153,0.000030575506,0.0000061750998,0.0005621983,0.005494671,0.000111749934,0.00024136006,0.9311484,0.05314291,0.008675838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030556283,0.000017959686,0.005940876,0.00038092321,0.00004357818,0.00047123834,0.0076915957,0.00066328276,0.0009234629,0.08932596,0.894383,0.00012750644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9799089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.993042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9799089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.114826545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13187546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8331288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789297527","doi":"","title":"Profit Shifting by Canadian Multinational Corporations: Prospects of Reversal under Canada's Country-by-Country Reporting Rules","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Base erosion and profit shifting; Multinational corporation; Profit (economics); Unitary state; Apportionment; Law; Economics; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.022408807099521626,"score_gpt":0.26423164868317767,"score_spread":0.24182284158365605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789297527","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4830814,0.0063006645,0.0080367755,0.13862754,0.0012419961,0.0005637611,0.0013180161,0.0003055562,0.3605243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9315286,0.003836786,0.008818912,0.011514749,0.00013329576,0.000072723175,0.0006076023,0.000048669222,0.043438602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9799731,0.0012012697,0.00077738083,0.00084398664,0.012450269,0.004753999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9546108,0.005075187,0.0026318864,0.002074835,0.033173796,0.0024333738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013636014,0.00039997132,0.0004425822,0.0021583203,0.011502379,0.013446429,0.0030970355,0.0028347152,0.0019325082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034719743,0.00045756774,0.00080174435,0.0027515013,0.0038665526,0.002454758,0.0024794056,0.0038024706,0.00022407898],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027312431,0.00021162552,0.08159202,0.0002537797,0.00009413008,0.0015202145,0.011546395,0.0077736205,0.0023673137,0.56023824,0.13801439,0.19611512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002558949,0.0002689434,0.23618184,0.0009958934,0.0004064572,0.0007420137,0.025339283,0.019904263,0.009186726,0.03576433,0.670075,0.0008793151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99060035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99129313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09591309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09591309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2741895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6959014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791218475","doi":"","title":"Experts for Hire: A Dangerous Practice Which Increases the Risk of Bias and Disadvantages the Accused","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Context (archaeology); Law; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Relevance (law); Divergence (linguistics); Political science; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.06541093926273694,"score_gpt":0.2976347320918023,"score_spread":0.23222379282906536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791218475","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20462567,0.0012772419,0.16129547,0.13143815,0.0007677953,0.0006693542,0.0002599843,0.0003507073,0.49931565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90759254,0.00036829617,0.015972706,0.011224695,0.00033008473,0.00018721665,0.000032604814,0.0000661205,0.06422579],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865954,0.0055568777,0.00036222572,0.0022062548,0.0038449927,0.0014342662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97683185,0.009925055,0.0036774331,0.0056599258,0.002422183,0.001483515],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011355085,0.00048107115,0.00088516163,0.0011377892,0.005243662,0.0071239644,0.0030457827,0.010344513,0.008434641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040541314,0.0005960478,0.0007286497,0.0010702386,0.01188339,0.005855168,0.004819783,0.0066808066,0.003010833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038267972,0.00008183548,0.00453831,0.000045796794,0.000024359426,0.0003468893,0.003269298,0.000908509,0.0004579127,0.9570185,0.008626943,0.024643414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015557645,0.00024294779,0.006417303,0.00027304282,0.00006610681,0.0016139268,0.003182772,0.011288902,0.0013931507,0.8424943,0.13275956,0.00011235562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008704674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015246073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99475634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034359675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005899013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060052156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792288245","doi":"","title":"Ethics, Legal Professionalism and Reconciliation: Enacting Reconciliation Through Civility","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Civility; Sociology; Law; Legal ethics; Economic Justice; Harassment; Political science","score_opus":0.24842312770623612,"score_gpt":0.4922463388024223,"score_spread":0.24382321109618618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792288245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11656632,0.0065840594,0.07442245,0.20622604,0.00069247844,0.00036984982,0.000036683985,0.0001558926,0.5949462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.962932,0.0011207557,0.013928829,0.0064211222,0.000067734945,0.00011249882,0.000013118527,0.000049910384,0.01535403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95870125,0.027947566,0.00077809754,0.0015209841,0.0057713506,0.005280835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98221177,0.010141405,0.0016404748,0.0015023395,0.0025990994,0.0019047742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03334583,0.00053579564,0.0004965033,0.0022279592,0.028946785,0.019053247,0.0026269022,0.0063437168,0.0025216856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024532853,0.00051746453,0.0004691609,0.0014158391,0.10839542,0.010358376,0.016850024,0.01028735,0.0003413785],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050657864,0.000020539163,0.0004803464,0.00006445814,0.000004733293,0.00025325877,0.2045641,0.00027855742,0.0001813167,0.7788733,0.0027533118,0.012521017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016152007,0.000031245858,0.0018267697,0.00053616875,0.000016206304,0.00041103936,0.22528067,0.0010633676,0.001275136,0.44962645,0.319857,0.000059787653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20796926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2995701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20796926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0411699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12275627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41351748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792894764","doi":"","title":"By All Unlawful Means? An Inquiry into the Scope of the Unlawful Means Tort","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Certainty; Tort; Law; Plaintiff; Economic Justice; Interpretation (philosophy); Supreme court; Scope (computer science); Liability; Legal certainty; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06812664938748614,"score_gpt":0.38641440689530343,"score_spread":0.3182877575078173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792894764","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06278581,0.026493877,0.074698426,0.117109194,0.0004680479,0.00012282893,0.00010759815,0.00006755987,0.7181466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96362066,0.0050043846,0.006053291,0.012845357,0.0008051024,0.00023819013,0.000027476253,0.000048912538,0.01135652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98534507,0.0063623413,0.00061493146,0.0015455071,0.0047127753,0.0014193229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9740424,0.019737506,0.0015426851,0.0021926875,0.0017253781,0.00075930683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015339465,0.0006073323,0.001076552,0.0024724961,0.006428358,0.012696519,0.0022003362,0.01097515,0.0018254025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019200124,0.000906786,0.0011508102,0.0012561949,0.055447347,0.014000586,0.0079693915,0.0128425965,0.00037754435],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021142168,0.000005264823,0.000067648776,0.0000087636945,0.0000018959056,0.00003232294,0.00069545355,0.000094331524,0.00005480648,0.9976165,0.000345904,0.0010749475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004900184,0.000010159859,0.00023405725,0.0001293956,0.0000062713652,0.000064943684,0.0005130481,0.00030153454,0.0001406655,0.98524654,0.013337936,0.000010475452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064003845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056125824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015339465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006259157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00786022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08112383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793194118","doi":"","title":"When Google Becomes the Norm: The Case for Privacy and the Right to be Forgotten","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Internet privacy; Charter; Right to be forgotten; Personally identifiable information; Globe; Jurisdiction; Norm (philosophy); Law; Business; Political science; Sociology; Data Protection Act 1998; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.04989791015890382,"score_gpt":0.3422379807863614,"score_spread":0.2923400706274576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793194118","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0464822,0.0045926184,0.0038278413,0.665951,0.0010202748,0.00005083497,0.00012624686,0.00006697181,0.27788195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8233115,0.0031554054,0.0018742589,0.1382967,0.0013424971,0.00010687678,0.000078065306,0.00014649352,0.031688113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96372294,0.013567528,0.0015497492,0.0039359205,0.01146346,0.0057604006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9656146,0.021680025,0.0028972067,0.004448221,0.0034603092,0.0018996424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022537446,0.0003578837,0.0008410833,0.0019645595,0.017079586,0.030173328,0.0031556934,0.03871463,0.00469899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05748716,0.0006915728,0.000997216,0.0029985968,0.07760286,0.0367833,0.011201683,0.02382817,0.0012319237],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017332497,0.0000132190835,0.0007578474,0.000028498624,0.0000045235483,0.00035284573,0.010683204,0.0000550499,0.00006965314,0.96763694,0.015380564,0.005000343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002696526,0.000026064985,0.001283704,0.0006077294,0.000022812752,0.0007678226,0.022184826,0.00037901965,0.0004834259,0.69363075,0.28048116,0.00010570594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057293087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03864975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057293087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009456805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022512715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11919081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016750273","doi":"","title":"Patient v. God: Determining the Standard of Care for Christian Science Practitioners in Medical Negligence Cases","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medical negligence; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.034342414452244195,"score_gpt":0.3832997399443293,"score_spread":0.34895732549208514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3016750273","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8538757,0.0008451864,0.007055887,0.08960894,0.00035226683,0.00045615245,0.0001988712,0.00004986272,0.047557093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99194384,0.00007504097,0.0029909417,0.0043710107,0.00004170418,0.00006687573,0.000021282258,0.000007003908,0.00048226328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9497349,0.027407372,0.005735918,0.0022347786,0.009408313,0.005478651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89035267,0.08117641,0.0099894265,0.0027066027,0.008770306,0.0070045646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05832309,0.0002584013,0.0007115446,0.0030477815,0.007851598,0.0070062433,0.0030779324,0.012126239,0.003240154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19719896,0.00063166925,0.00087098964,0.001338242,0.007312415,0.0049337912,0.0063187904,0.008387383,0.000330233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029006556,0.00094919134,0.331007,0.0004630867,0.0003388706,0.0064770575,0.043824855,0.0045350576,0.0028566658,0.46003,0.037463147,0.109154336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001209556,0.0039940104,0.4758847,0.0042563705,0.0010838978,0.0078078946,0.11772574,0.03265071,0.01480906,0.28345403,0.05617754,0.0009464074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018199539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04275792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05832309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008823878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03138608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30844563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122291241","doi":"","title":"Conflict resolution processes in end-of-life care disputes between families and healthcare providers in Canada.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Empathy; Health care; Legislature; Conflict resolution; Face (sociological concept); End-of-life care; Sociology; Public relations; Law; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Nursing; Palliative care; Social science; Medicine","score_opus":0.05180825918322724,"score_gpt":0.33128338459594103,"score_spread":0.2794751254127138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122291241","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83276445,0.007406522,0.0032302728,0.06506535,0.0002841079,0.0006274984,0.00024231829,0.00004263529,0.09033685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910006,0.00082725927,0.001370006,0.0013710947,0.00001228388,0.00005552629,0.00003907925,0.000009679049,0.005314324],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98561156,0.0072416402,0.00061938196,0.0007381117,0.00248492,0.0033043928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97350794,0.013164464,0.0032077234,0.00045648738,0.004398709,0.0052646836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011218893,0.00031584947,0.00034439357,0.0014189888,0.04587076,0.007856123,0.0027995876,0.0035408256,0.0036675783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044131037,0.00046674238,0.00043518416,0.0022109991,0.015001855,0.003451094,0.007351719,0.00403924,0.00023458766],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009237366,0.000081838916,0.024060337,0.00012994402,0.000017447706,0.0038361612,0.87280005,0.0005975131,0.0002166307,0.055312023,0.009291324,0.033564255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028811794,0.000020340201,0.025218006,0.00028384745,0.000013704206,0.0006566496,0.89843506,0.0011021479,0.00024482576,0.011462569,0.062449437,0.00008457402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9778137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9885455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1948784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1948784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1981846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9338269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123409510","doi":"","title":"International Law from Below: Development, Social Movements and Third World Resistance","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":301,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Resistance (ecology); Law; Third world; Sociology; Political science; History; Economic history","score_opus":0.04254255933461592,"score_gpt":0.26093582823912065,"score_spread":0.21839326890450472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123409510","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037181387,0.570826,0.0013111915,0.09765201,0.0028429143,0.000028118357,0.000094804214,0.000046061643,0.3234808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17291017,0.59398276,0.00090488873,0.024249645,0.005470402,0.00015189026,0.00024262945,0.0001270625,0.20196055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902,0.00032326163,0.000038449805,0.00007416045,0.00037879497,0.00016533514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990662,0.00044071485,0.000111584355,0.0000506191,0.00019047888,0.00014044228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095786003,0.00040575996,0.0004869966,0.002399375,0.00281299,0.010747014,0.00059470406,0.0029222216,0.007870624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022534602,0.00021546321,0.0002830248,0.0056857644,0.008189702,0.0074755233,0.002419652,0.0041896957,0.0014308173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007111487,0.000033970584,0.0005575513,0.00022148986,0.000006246583,0.00008986501,0.004504863,0.0002361441,0.00009539123,0.6508668,0.2595775,0.08380306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003346095,0.000012246419,0.0019493299,0.0013571759,0.000005364942,0.00009987532,0.0032991876,0.000082785096,0.00006134104,0.10357669,0.88954145,0.0000111468225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023655953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031655647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023655953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005888556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009318743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04703653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125497815","doi":"","title":"Autonomous Weapons Systems: Taking the Human out of International Humanitarian Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Law, AI, and Intellectual Property","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International humanitarian law; Adversary; Geneva Conventions; Law; Political science; International law; Convention; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.05581112191346898,"score_gpt":0.29572824925084745,"score_spread":0.23991712733737847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125497815","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009402564,0.006853463,0.0708821,0.22796026,0.0018864716,0.00011748851,0.00010418131,0.0003358663,0.6824577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.665145,0.012429668,0.06278398,0.09806219,0.0027768963,0.0004797344,0.00022424417,0.00027532832,0.15782303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99320203,0.0025396582,0.00031201186,0.0007284178,0.0024159183,0.00080205704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924717,0.0038749052,0.0006847557,0.0011312324,0.0011077323,0.0007296767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009956512,0.00041741706,0.00034299135,0.0015328892,0.0057647214,0.0142464535,0.0022775917,0.010099951,0.008376357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013373609,0.00037235735,0.00048567474,0.0012164796,0.033470586,0.017750693,0.007915881,0.007821645,0.0015028529],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025780862,0.000005618013,0.000090012596,0.000022058135,0.000001230649,0.000039375755,0.00091426034,0.00016024442,0.000066846784,0.97911865,0.011049061,0.008530202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011870187,0.00002813986,0.00029716306,0.00033454667,0.0000068541326,0.00012748638,0.0025585135,0.0011188559,0.00042536246,0.63638574,0.35867706,0.000028383673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018916372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01894416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018916372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065607927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014094106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052655697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W639780213","doi":"","title":"Gaps, Issues, and Prospects: International Law and the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Maritime and Coastal Archaeology","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Cultural heritage; Expansive; United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; Law; Industrial heritage; Underwater; Cultural heritage management; Political science; Exclusive economic zone; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; History; Geography; Archaeology; Environmental science","score_opus":0.025426617982700198,"score_gpt":0.25906682536305015,"score_spread":0.23364020738034996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W639780213","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020613467,0.06870497,0.0022461289,0.5073039,0.001784527,0.000027316115,0.00007494161,0.000028673845,0.3992161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76392967,0.08386693,0.0032113486,0.08949343,0.004208572,0.00011495139,0.00013658733,0.000043329423,0.054995123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965263,0.0015131126,0.00014586857,0.00032329749,0.0007242311,0.0007671731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934323,0.0043198923,0.00056498434,0.00030602867,0.00080429635,0.0005723871],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008541088,0.00033372518,0.00044980526,0.0025553922,0.009267878,0.02026089,0.0018388912,0.010160504,0.009830979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008373521,0.00029560292,0.0003652136,0.0050262194,0.030731082,0.019080766,0.006624543,0.0081548365,0.0006268349],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006665371,0.000026864314,0.00055574515,0.00007669473,0.0000017389367,0.00012372773,0.0040187403,0.0000963769,0.000043887907,0.96741396,0.012221276,0.015414327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011042183,0.00003489156,0.0034993368,0.002211364,0.00001661864,0.00032185775,0.059581015,0.00049380003,0.00030035398,0.41207325,0.5214012,0.000055365515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04027229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049131736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04027229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011357956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020409955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08240807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6980579920","doi":"","title":"A Clean &amp; Healthy Environment: The Barriers &amp; Limitations of This Emerging Human Right","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Order (exchange); Right to health; Right to development; Sustainable development; International law; Right to know","score_opus":0.058365009755273596,"score_gpt":0.32752851257074017,"score_spread":0.2691635028154666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6980579920","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0103709735,0.0083198035,0.017698202,0.72243404,0.0013460432,0.00006765649,0.00011020173,0.00008438475,0.2395686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6279579,0.013704615,0.03337593,0.24370494,0.0022297576,0.00047373466,0.00016979699,0.00024241731,0.078141],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97355473,0.009776455,0.0013102076,0.002863654,0.009866171,0.0026288368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9534357,0.032129765,0.0021925922,0.004265475,0.004803433,0.0031730444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031936575,0.00043060572,0.00090199104,0.0011057557,0.007828338,0.019512007,0.002972338,0.01696937,0.010781053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03651191,0.00051312876,0.0008528035,0.0012242724,0.059314758,0.022259744,0.013913556,0.022961373,0.0021024954],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070911515,0.000016646774,0.00018695126,0.000059504593,0.0000031501684,0.0000508929,0.0013633675,0.00006790067,0.00013470642,0.9811241,0.009136777,0.007849022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017414308,0.000040847925,0.0006431048,0.0007135142,0.0000120042305,0.00032362065,0.0059862547,0.00034955965,0.0003113463,0.72320604,0.26833588,0.00006036258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018433893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021000154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031936575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072501535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026181934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16889876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6986838370","doi":"","title":"Reciprocity: Fair Trade of Free Trade? Challenging American Electricity Regulation under NAFTA","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Subpoena; Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Limiting; Diafiltration","score_opus":0.030915076630790097,"score_gpt":0.30592710728448175,"score_spread":0.2750120306536917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6986838370","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07697023,0.0026146525,0.018870903,0.23716287,0.0010613223,0.0001519358,0.000111692265,0.00012408114,0.6629323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9191578,0.0012612412,0.0060195527,0.036869854,0.0004469795,0.00014052045,0.000044162312,0.00005045712,0.036009416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9789409,0.006282542,0.0006442304,0.002709796,0.0073131807,0.0041094804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9843562,0.008036268,0.00082081516,0.0017052991,0.004302553,0.0007787718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02434437,0.00029469375,0.0006541369,0.0007222748,0.013493706,0.012578924,0.002299314,0.013326596,0.003143477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032905027,0.00043656072,0.00081767485,0.00080786686,0.024291366,0.006434809,0.0044679283,0.012580471,0.00048533877],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052367236,0.000005544179,0.00020196763,0.000006669621,0.0000028061454,0.000069482085,0.0015487501,0.00015699268,0.00007392593,0.99147296,0.0042353133,0.002220294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062202205,0.000038333365,0.0014173923,0.00030689585,0.000052471853,0.00021898246,0.004669076,0.0030247315,0.00071714196,0.669141,0.32023206,0.00011966121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5580969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5607474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9713275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028672537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08482757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88901114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7015476593","doi":"","title":"Stepping Forward or Stumbling Back? Command Responsibility for Failure to Act, Civilan Superiors and the International Criminal Court","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Statute; Status quo; International law; Jurisprudence; Customary international law; Relation (database); Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court; Criminal court","score_opus":0.07662652004601067,"score_gpt":0.36372510840756384,"score_spread":0.28709858836155316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7015476593","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09273983,0.009674161,0.0038916199,0.277535,0.0009088909,0.000023587236,0.000059869148,0.000081478116,0.61508554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93283993,0.0023842899,0.00058598706,0.015171593,0.00043918422,0.00001800466,0.000019602561,0.000030232093,0.04851112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99677604,0.0008685394,0.000090150344,0.00044196387,0.0007218218,0.0011014185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979169,0.0009963658,0.00021171196,0.0002216882,0.00031074978,0.00034256198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038837846,0.00023439582,0.00033449472,0.0013649124,0.008016998,0.011261863,0.0011279066,0.006421838,0.005841085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00848993,0.00025938614,0.0004003158,0.00093522493,0.020237328,0.007268329,0.003454425,0.0076138745,0.00055565627],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036546414,0.0000068484283,0.00056511833,0.000006935192,0.0000015637962,0.000075985314,0.0011902011,0.0001300132,0.000029777426,0.9841929,0.009078727,0.004718161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029572371,0.000036554597,0.0053919945,0.00024095479,0.000024329374,0.0002011957,0.01094562,0.0019193843,0.00046600334,0.7686601,0.21202202,0.00006213796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09366762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09593656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09366762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011642318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012516511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18624485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7033629983","doi":"","title":"Reconstructing Identity: A Personal Pespective","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Education and Vocational Training","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Dilemma; Categorical variable; Expression (computer science); Personal identity; Trajectory","score_opus":0.18226656833792212,"score_gpt":0.4191736926386618,"score_spread":0.23690712430073965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7033629983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41945902,0.010964234,0.01654915,0.13667527,0.002046597,0.0000662873,0.000095298805,0.00014046571,0.4140037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97986424,0.0017857401,0.0008487148,0.0034887288,0.0002813687,0.000016540253,0.000018404393,0.000049233455,0.013646998],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884857,0.008464517,0.00014581671,0.00074042194,0.0010047405,0.0011587439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925564,0.004571416,0.00053860253,0.00048076798,0.0006904367,0.0011623934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009368339,0.00074263953,0.00067585096,0.0025732866,0.026099723,0.023061499,0.002545616,0.0054899226,0.0034959435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012868743,0.00043159776,0.0003981125,0.0013070543,0.078707464,0.020173563,0.0149241015,0.011387437,0.0005549915],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012254471,0.00002650846,0.00073561125,0.000027592052,0.0000033368099,0.00067966804,0.81957483,0.000055256543,0.00015424992,0.17109388,0.0026223727,0.005014467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000271034,0.000022083977,0.0002561133,0.00012928195,0.0000033930178,0.0006888238,0.88178957,0.00010784865,0.0002805024,0.027173003,0.08953453,0.000012094364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072012227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010580208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026099723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005526607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004449516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04954511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7052194617","doi":"","title":"Putting the Ivy Out of the Windows: Presumptions of Privacy in the Home and R. v. Gomboc","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Magnetic confinement fusion research","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Subpoena; Government (linguistics); Pretext; Circumstantial evidence; Law enforcement","score_opus":0.025298976996639664,"score_gpt":0.30608873881855775,"score_spread":0.28078976182191806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7052194617","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057262782,0.014289492,0.004969332,0.1364614,0.00073026505,0.00010460967,0.00021623763,0.00009947761,0.7858664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84522456,0.0029181496,0.0018225145,0.06235536,0.0002570335,0.000115368384,0.00005002519,0.00005389184,0.08720318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949314,0.001135183,0.00011449305,0.0005204637,0.0014320596,0.0018664348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978661,0.0010230701,0.00010992081,0.00020183201,0.0005374206,0.0002616912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002965068,0.0003100123,0.00047828743,0.0007406129,0.015547815,0.010340691,0.0019235499,0.01059155,0.0029470944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009143384,0.00046673504,0.0006702885,0.00070491066,0.020538125,0.0034443066,0.0031859344,0.0086571,0.00044464075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012926097,0.0000050236035,0.0001987142,0.000012094934,0.0000033247845,0.00024521293,0.0027090118,0.00014717218,0.000044085555,0.9831919,0.011713533,0.001716956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007457946,0.000052727333,0.003256492,0.0008391874,0.00006266651,0.00039345972,0.013453778,0.0016765118,0.0007015937,0.5676348,0.41172212,0.00013211074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7874406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7619359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2125594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027499305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038055424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42762238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7093486469","doi":"","title":"Lesbian Mothers &amp; Gay Fathers: Overt and Subconscious Homophobic Biases Concerning Parental Fitness","year":2010,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subconscious; Presumption; Lesbian; Adversarial system; Homosexuality; Morality; Human sexuality; Freudian slip","score_opus":0.06043260952179957,"score_gpt":0.3416900156408338,"score_spread":0.2812574061190342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7093486469","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.965247,0.00052138366,0.00028707722,0.004043809,0.000041718347,0.000011536653,0.0000095825635,0.0000056896006,0.029832218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99762195,0.00023339232,0.00006018343,0.00065782067,0.000016276195,0.0000070344213,0.0000028103907,0.000002256266,0.0013982188],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974445,0.001843661,0.00005439959,0.00011865974,0.00033001485,0.00020880658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977349,0.0012913063,0.00054429885,0.000120206394,0.00013010953,0.00017922591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003339809,0.00016560871,0.00015579225,0.0005373573,0.0037027416,0.0030288168,0.0002816885,0.00084352196,0.003949607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072473953,0.00023271167,0.00007280912,0.00028881978,0.0059526265,0.0011266345,0.0020771301,0.0016342151,0.00032502375],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043183623,0.000080179685,0.06140098,0.000047587415,0.000011912555,0.0036306444,0.8796331,0.000033324624,0.0016438558,0.03056493,0.0020670507,0.020843254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013242196,0.00006178585,0.0672235,0.00025599488,0.000016435823,0.005487594,0.8934747,0.00014850759,0.00087058963,0.0069936165,0.025433064,0.000021036136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006847619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017415773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006847619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009129655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007256579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017662823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W845405134","doi":"","title":"Principle and Imagination in Judging: A Conversation with Mr. Justice James MacPherson","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Economic Justice; Scrutiny; Sociology; Skepticism; Conversation; Appeal; Premise; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.018159643009412228,"score_gpt":0.3139202530030376,"score_spread":0.29576060999362536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W845405134","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0064251577,0.023268472,0.0005457669,0.9453658,0.009245633,0.000033323853,0.000021075357,0.000031561678,0.01506321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19948068,0.015964514,0.0024413741,0.74080765,0.011306302,0.00014002221,0.000032999375,0.00024550955,0.029581005],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9750542,0.015622729,0.00046732213,0.0018251421,0.004331881,0.0026987193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96942735,0.018481629,0.0006788766,0.000416547,0.0035242904,0.0074713933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022713138,0.000980721,0.0019676725,0.0020819572,0.053350292,0.015725931,0.003832454,0.018237988,0.0042563975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0363708,0.0012585255,0.0010195393,0.001586851,0.034736224,0.012828953,0.006319357,0.045154206,0.0008327898],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005372408,0.00011175127,0.00050389004,0.000141068,0.000025452378,0.0018914953,0.27205473,0.00008978413,0.00045128932,0.04623488,0.664106,0.014335887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027573304,0.00006409494,0.0010745369,0.0006292853,0.000011431297,0.0010590305,0.1647364,0.00018493323,0.00018342251,0.010874195,0.8210247,0.00013030988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25224945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30527404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7477505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029343411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020709442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50156236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W897471759","doi":"","title":"HIV and Shared Responsibility: A Critical Evaluation of Mabior and DC","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Autonomy; Harm; Obligation; Law; Criminal law; Supreme court; Sexual assault; Political science; Criminology; Confidentiality; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Sociology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.07367276692934686,"score_gpt":0.4010684395194092,"score_spread":0.3273956725900623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W897471759","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019734394,0.05942611,0.009861773,0.5999416,0.0047462536,0.000664317,0.00006167818,0.00003248777,0.30553135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8456779,0.020709556,0.006158008,0.10791197,0.0018902329,0.0010644594,0.000030106616,0.00007592689,0.016481906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9518088,0.035356935,0.001114158,0.0019122174,0.00681931,0.0029886332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.913759,0.066350825,0.0013406335,0.0023001872,0.013322464,0.0029269478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07837827,0.000821811,0.0011016327,0.004950078,0.025162881,0.021526981,0.0034699172,0.01088607,0.0061269756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0643574,0.00043325278,0.0010298599,0.0026160544,0.07105502,0.0194662,0.013779926,0.015813686,0.0003035291],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028587046,0.000020308675,0.0002990951,0.00025451573,0.000011289797,0.00009998043,0.00963806,0.00009659102,0.000022895583,0.9635322,0.010845222,0.015151203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011669464,0.00015166643,0.00116183,0.006147083,0.00016913709,0.00032986395,0.08587734,0.0008983485,0.000496972,0.5266918,0.37786898,0.00009018683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055635083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.082721874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07837827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.056906383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07352283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41450888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}