{"meta":{"query_hash":"05754fa525de","filters":{"venue":"Dalhousie law journal"},"cohort_total":143,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":143,"exported":143,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/05754fa525de","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Dalhousie+law+journal"},"results":[{"id":"W117286435","doi":"","title":"In Search of \"Compass and Gyroscope\": Where Were Adaptive Management and Principled Negotiation in Nova Scotia's Forest-Strategy Process?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Political science; Prosperity; Negotiation; Politics; Humanities; Geography; Sociology; Ethnology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018725140159879305,"score_gpt":0.27409360868657834,"score_spread":0.25536846852669903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W117286435","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27984083,0.011594339,0.012951053,0.19470876,0.0014961173,0.00032789167,0.00015782019,0.0000679923,0.49885523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9469119,0.0017013157,0.0036852884,0.0056182197,0.000038587157,0.00006802829,0.000039885388,0.000022051836,0.041914757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99449027,0.00235764,0.00018555456,0.0005017095,0.00074010907,0.0017246939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955869,0.0021671455,0.0003702106,0.00019150616,0.0007116172,0.0009726784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050235353,0.00037294597,0.00025320877,0.00091821805,0.016134568,0.0121053,0.0012298936,0.0026343325,0.0019911977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008950212,0.00031547298,0.00033203812,0.0018275055,0.025352027,0.003550636,0.0043489984,0.0031296422,0.00022153572],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014253026,0.000039912327,0.014208323,0.00021073388,0.000018612394,0.0023043817,0.33166957,0.0010176459,0.0011752471,0.5855811,0.018108442,0.04552345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005432506,0.000060836537,0.03554219,0.0007182273,0.000026410504,0.0005380231,0.39852932,0.0017306556,0.000924882,0.07896714,0.4827728,0.00013509899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.919177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9562731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09086845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09086845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08659406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65929985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1424791837","doi":"","title":"Thin-Skull Plaintiffs, Socio-Cultural \"Abnormalities\" and the Dangers of an Objective Test for Hypersensitivity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Prudence; Tort; Humanities; Law; Compensation (psychology); Insanity defense; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Liability; Social psychology; Philosophy; Insanity; Epistemology","score_opus":0.031026230842650944,"score_gpt":0.36324996588627184,"score_spread":0.3322237350436209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1424791837","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8475335,0.0031034837,0.0068021384,0.046338636,0.0005590904,0.0002449413,0.00034371027,0.000031765652,0.09504265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896215,0.0006443692,0.002361739,0.005345449,0.00008916514,0.000043864537,0.00004376509,0.000008600828,0.0018415154],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909332,0.0024553956,0.0005092188,0.0008282363,0.0043554236,0.00091855094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9716958,0.014324046,0.005840962,0.0028764196,0.0037505976,0.0015121433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016582917,0.00036681382,0.00043452095,0.0025291112,0.003453924,0.0036378978,0.0017832826,0.0026685568,0.00291585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.073620476,0.0002523142,0.0005472875,0.0009357954,0.014728386,0.003324322,0.0030291523,0.004031597,0.0002735526],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003432165,0.00037719047,0.4901498,0.00031102655,0.00018345282,0.007550774,0.029398875,0.0008978968,0.0022525052,0.36250752,0.012147489,0.093880296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017092213,0.0006126533,0.62424177,0.002136923,0.00030533082,0.010153221,0.038783815,0.004102068,0.008750761,0.2593379,0.051137883,0.0002667662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06619207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13867173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06619207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035480373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070554926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13161355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2203954623","doi":"","title":"Keeping up with the Joneses: A Model Systemic Risk Reporting Regime for the Canadian Hedge Fund Industry","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Insurance and Financial Risk Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hedge fund; Political science; Welfare economics; Business; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.107517974843185,"score_gpt":0.2627959264335336,"score_spread":0.15527795159034863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2203954623","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33275607,0.001479121,0.30379316,0.021185795,0.00023343632,0.0009530599,0.003129805,0.00081865327,0.3356509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91781974,0.0006756868,0.03991011,0.0005240994,0.00009855335,0.00023953637,0.0003905209,0.000056178964,0.040285666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99706477,0.000583558,0.00009913888,0.00054271246,0.00085118064,0.0008586402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961287,0.0009939506,0.00069266063,0.00054907426,0.0011669452,0.00046865482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004004416,0.00067604095,0.0007811159,0.0014640486,0.002773936,0.0054730363,0.0041929735,0.002942102,0.0058190934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007620449,0.00051096536,0.001302939,0.0012810469,0.0039770077,0.0031066283,0.0023501015,0.0023267749,0.00064779265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015507752,0.000070679096,0.0040618726,0.00006650479,0.000030592273,0.00038673534,0.00090318813,0.17449908,0.0014559233,0.8006152,0.0059870104,0.01176805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002599953,0.00012168766,0.005076697,0.00009223898,0.000097937635,0.00023417111,0.0008232344,0.7565336,0.0010952946,0.20327395,0.03218362,0.00020750111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.70898384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.60244125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98013556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019864427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018238876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2227833285","doi":"","title":"Directors’ Legal Duties and CSR: Prohibited, Permitted or Prescribed in Contemporary Corporate Law?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate social responsibility; Law; Business; Corporate law; Legal status; Political science; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.04963109755988988,"score_gpt":0.22849763975187012,"score_spread":0.17886654219198025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2227833285","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15940449,0.032627854,0.0055751917,0.32335064,0.0013263987,0.000024720692,0.00012919161,0.000040843952,0.47752064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9785057,0.004253654,0.0006084777,0.00944617,0.00089593447,0.000017697224,0.000024549552,0.000017120672,0.006230737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929986,0.0030715647,0.00037222548,0.00084900385,0.001506539,0.0012021487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865568,0.008856806,0.0015804616,0.00065160106,0.0015810654,0.0007731245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010954834,0.00023585702,0.0005607663,0.0028441632,0.005980591,0.019262444,0.0017200788,0.010352409,0.0064766854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01591958,0.00057924364,0.0003742952,0.0035005398,0.066908985,0.016062476,0.0032388945,0.012166204,0.00043758523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007568358,0.000020187774,0.0007838023,0.000017574637,0.0000032354667,0.000017474362,0.0038221118,0.00006368109,0.000037611135,0.98812264,0.002369117,0.004735117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032567412,0.000025992133,0.0117685,0.0006541607,0.000025395497,0.00008700609,0.019442393,0.00082946644,0.00019486777,0.8844843,0.082384735,0.00007064794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058933567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.110963926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058933567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010116636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010766457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11718106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2333033842","doi":"","title":"Unlimited Liability in the Modern Context: An Examination of Shareholder Liability in Nova Scotia Unlimited Liability Companies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Statutory law; Corporate law; Bankruptcy; Jurisdiction; Context (archaeology); Insolvency; Limited liability partnership; Liability; Strict liability; Business; Political science; Finance; History; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.06774176622991555,"score_gpt":0.2602254604372612,"score_spread":0.19248369420734562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2333033842","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2513031,0.07530158,0.0008212054,0.027008252,0.0004951553,0.00008238205,0.000208785,0.000016090238,0.6447634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.892962,0.028587243,0.00033220803,0.005383028,0.00023038717,0.000025066372,0.0000892468,0.000010679624,0.07238028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986846,0.00017147284,0.000041692707,0.000080886726,0.00046862202,0.0005527541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981103,0.0007314666,0.00034026787,0.000052093117,0.0005037771,0.0002621197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070034096,0.00016286728,0.00015725967,0.002582568,0.005443879,0.0049377275,0.00092245045,0.0017238929,0.0066206465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002381683,0.00020334648,0.0002061139,0.0036626016,0.007873249,0.0018086426,0.002075403,0.0019106759,0.00043073363],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004644058,0.00005612048,0.02882215,0.0005735338,0.00001582818,0.013740305,0.06052663,0.0011008645,0.0012125557,0.80247957,0.044882562,0.04654349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000773185,0.00004247395,0.21446353,0.0019581516,0.000021524891,0.003905634,0.048346218,0.00071467843,0.0003327764,0.023434632,0.7067151,0.000057501285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.79724574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9118043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20275426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038101166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015578112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40789658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337390637","doi":"","title":"The Contract of Employment at the Supreme Court of Canada: Employee Protection and the Presumption of Employer Freedom","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of contract; Law; Presumption; Labour law; Employment contract; Supreme court; Notice; Exclusion clause; Economics; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Contract management; Management; Engineering","score_opus":0.026696156329836157,"score_gpt":0.26351942403558193,"score_spread":0.23682326770574577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337390637","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04004303,0.027577676,0.0016646065,0.1543134,0.0027991973,0.00029795026,0.0019632452,0.00009554665,0.7712454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58848727,0.0116324425,0.0014009451,0.090734184,0.001600991,0.0002617713,0.0005888636,0.000104999664,0.30518854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98947525,0.0007324351,0.00025285644,0.00095660734,0.0044531454,0.004129666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933211,0.0025393476,0.00025568402,0.0002530175,0.0026884004,0.0009423953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004073365,0.00056213286,0.0006329354,0.0016895642,0.030974342,0.012801868,0.0039523724,0.01785189,0.013031145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01323217,0.0008496572,0.00068189244,0.0034985044,0.011519747,0.0026734318,0.0029177566,0.0133619355,0.0007675063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020477237,0.000022715141,0.0011788192,0.00006297666,0.000010838167,0.000526948,0.002826995,0.0003264193,0.00014759226,0.87294894,0.11516317,0.0067641884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005441305,0.000029682204,0.011523133,0.0012006657,0.00006845146,0.00026244577,0.004194678,0.0019250129,0.00043148675,0.10571728,0.8743928,0.00019992916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98792565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9923643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12191708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12191708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19950356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8845744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589723758","doi":"","title":"Nom De Plume: Who Writes the Supreme Court's \"By the Court\" Judgments?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Humanities; Political science; Redaction; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.021664389761494502,"score_gpt":0.27380010781380726,"score_spread":0.2521357180523128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2589723758","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021162149,0.020542467,0.006703958,0.23032661,0.014612219,0.00012344419,0.0011541283,0.0003724973,0.70500255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42958584,0.01390184,0.0037524195,0.054487888,0.00846052,0.00018564356,0.0012393392,0.00090341334,0.48748308],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976648,0.001147735,0.00009452728,0.0003382725,0.00060832204,0.00014636497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997408,0.0011056149,0.0002006834,0.00010601465,0.000932013,0.0002476696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024029927,0.00047706123,0.00034652688,0.0016886556,0.005456223,0.0106806345,0.0007618331,0.0018645561,0.019222878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010746695,0.00028668594,0.00017331891,0.0013905871,0.0042259353,0.0075343545,0.0022345101,0.003535542,0.008389993],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006090845,0.000016281887,0.0028500918,0.00027365435,0.0000075108214,0.00046030094,0.04445118,0.00004290098,0.0010422915,0.3356463,0.52733403,0.0878146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039401693,0.000009393188,0.0012143905,0.00021884673,0.000004034092,0.00018209525,0.014416357,0.00008811339,0.00038823157,0.009437524,0.97401965,0.000017357755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01901954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027569458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019222878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004920974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003849358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064306974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2595340809","doi":"","title":"Moving Beyond Rhetoric: Working Toward Reconciliation Through Self-Determination","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; Indigenous rights; Humanities; Law; Declaration; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.049418196592425155,"score_gpt":0.32046868282084073,"score_spread":0.2710504862284156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2595340809","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041599084,0.01964747,0.10251535,0.2723688,0.0026979547,0.00023308462,0.00008592894,0.00053772214,0.5603146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88356626,0.005228051,0.04078522,0.017111177,0.0009404126,0.00021489001,0.000118352094,0.0006511458,0.051384483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.94352454,0.042437974,0.0010440112,0.0028966235,0.0066831857,0.0034136781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9599148,0.025727207,0.0021088105,0.0030414069,0.0068452023,0.002362489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.051002733,0.0012086176,0.0009945257,0.0053379973,0.034577224,0.02873765,0.0044209147,0.0077464744,0.0050832964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036359187,0.0006753319,0.0009413981,0.003574104,0.11177999,0.02790838,0.018318692,0.010817372,0.0010922176],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000998143,0.000013128929,0.0003705684,0.00010929027,0.000008904104,0.00019473456,0.20771222,0.0001792925,0.00020625541,0.76602036,0.009506308,0.01566891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022090722,0.000017171471,0.0002522628,0.0006449157,0.000021563112,0.00015972978,0.08656538,0.00064425886,0.00080912735,0.39705688,0.5137634,0.000043218504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12182805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12808403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12182805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041682377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06678511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30242825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599308209","doi":"","title":"Defining Métis People as a People: Moving Beyond the Indian/Métis Dichotomy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"South Asian Studies and Conflicts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metis; Genealogy; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.01650442214867186,"score_gpt":0.28303758677171564,"score_spread":0.2665331646230438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599308209","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3353552,0.0079045575,0.026392095,0.060976572,0.00141733,0.0000978508,0.00007774142,0.0000816315,0.5676971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857955,0.0013132048,0.00283771,0.002931141,0.00019041084,0.000049723625,0.000028993056,0.00003914236,0.006814314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940587,0.0029381067,0.00023959791,0.0004993783,0.0014806506,0.0007834805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980488,0.0005798616,0.00035214212,0.00018390565,0.00038279733,0.00045248662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042656045,0.00043967212,0.0005120502,0.002927048,0.009118745,0.011416606,0.0012743183,0.0021566758,0.0023980811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038714646,0.00024281301,0.00041516122,0.0018945193,0.043943256,0.010267173,0.011331102,0.0059478628,0.00041804143],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012438913,0.000013145215,0.0020531665,0.00004725556,0.0000051202974,0.00012336917,0.16418709,0.000034982244,0.00026929917,0.8252198,0.00096780306,0.007066476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016077964,0.00005541179,0.006482482,0.0006033309,0.000032299627,0.00064407976,0.4052151,0.00044004573,0.00069665175,0.31495923,0.2707923,0.000062919746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016359806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017638406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9836402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005979298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005118486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043383062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602224305","doi":"","title":"Judgment and Opportunity: Decision Assignment on the McLachlin Court","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Humanities; Redaction; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.08282033351291515,"score_gpt":0.24322079937221452,"score_spread":0.16040046585929937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602224305","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6406081,0.00053614384,0.008131294,0.0074286456,0.00012028021,0.0003448719,0.00020194941,0.0000688726,0.34255987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98498625,0.0000845233,0.001797623,0.0002293234,0.000042685115,0.000037345017,0.000034990375,0.000015670155,0.012771624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861568,0.0031117105,0.00032623386,0.0012324002,0.0053822715,0.0037905595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904721,0.0037713381,0.00076075055,0.00037789924,0.0017738895,0.002844027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005105008,0.00029698483,0.00041593087,0.0024271656,0.011045209,0.0111366855,0.0011679971,0.0013585589,0.012472179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022717588,0.00036099076,0.00032778704,0.0021554509,0.006833233,0.0029965565,0.0068284585,0.0022305534,0.0007198797],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006898423,0.00027214704,0.06467454,0.00008145023,0.000042634216,0.0021529815,0.02908917,0.0062070913,0.0023941656,0.6507679,0.018974472,0.22465354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023194848,0.0005903528,0.3035273,0.00032792342,0.00011694945,0.00064883596,0.061772503,0.034406845,0.003179207,0.4348212,0.16002744,0.00034951273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30797085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.53171706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96933633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030663667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025041068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61235654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602589497","doi":"","title":"High Freshets and Low-Lying Farms: Property Law and St. John River Flooding in Colonial New Brunswick","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Private property; Legislature; Legislation; Political science; Ethnology; Geography; SAINT; Property rights; Corporate governance; Humanities; Law; History; Art; Business; Art history","score_opus":0.017895989863882304,"score_gpt":0.2060680090611872,"score_spread":0.1881720191973049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602589497","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98583174,0.00039890784,0.000043957032,0.0028286653,0.000011121458,0.000009857237,0.00006862839,0.0000016792843,0.01080543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971307,0.00036807326,0.000033555938,0.00024566246,0.000003966063,0.000006036443,0.00003184787,0.0000025829947,0.002177628],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994342,0.00011766701,0.000026581552,0.000057422174,0.00006969692,0.0002944037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982141,0.00062601356,0.0005204935,0.000060872306,0.00019858862,0.00037991646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068419153,0.0001013456,0.00014193171,0.00085121026,0.0038221444,0.0023452782,0.00070402544,0.00054719235,0.002935072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027802347,0.00020334378,0.00009613321,0.0019797091,0.006177684,0.0010661199,0.0016791336,0.0011474481,0.00008054693],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009545443,0.00008663304,0.5918785,0.00010154155,0.00002912634,0.00579067,0.35177752,0.00043412962,0.0019481247,0.020359864,0.003360161,0.024138281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007464013,0.000019049048,0.68122625,0.000112690075,0.0000115943185,0.00029244248,0.29523832,0.00015030123,0.0002147435,0.0011116905,0.021578709,0.00003670778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9373405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9828892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0626595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021498544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012199424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15598363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2603201379","doi":"","title":"Limiting the Legal Liability of Religious Institutions for their Clergy: Cavanaugh v. Grenville Christian College","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Appeal; Liability; Obligation; Law; Jurisprudence; Legal liability","score_opus":0.03983698994163903,"score_gpt":0.3037155938956197,"score_spread":0.26387860395398066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2603201379","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39523855,0.0044402927,0.0013412351,0.10999664,0.00040244422,0.0001998584,0.00010788536,0.000049908358,0.48822314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94086325,0.0009436501,0.00041449172,0.017345924,0.00012672014,0.000056980523,0.000025715779,0.000011969218,0.04021123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99523675,0.0008258977,0.00012117521,0.00042092428,0.0014348391,0.001960438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99450964,0.0023419245,0.0005412938,0.00038571356,0.00096514006,0.0012562285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033429847,0.00026905377,0.0002064532,0.0009086503,0.010561147,0.005398969,0.002649112,0.008822731,0.0039396095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007079243,0.0003969958,0.00035321058,0.0007006864,0.009022445,0.001542559,0.0037382534,0.005690918,0.00042194297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017553917,0.00012306609,0.03636655,0.0001922321,0.00004652887,0.010259905,0.04598346,0.0007596103,0.006496161,0.83097124,0.046807926,0.021817887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030741526,0.00037038524,0.09480637,0.0014687448,0.0002148226,0.004043589,0.06743605,0.002086751,0.008702245,0.052540645,0.76745147,0.0005714819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78139186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9307026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78139186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02396228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03544584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606519287","doi":"","title":"The Doctrine of Lost Modern Grant and Prescriptive Easements in Newfoundland","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Easement; Political science; Humanities; Doctrine; Law; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02591238136236075,"score_gpt":0.28901682981998017,"score_spread":0.26310444845761943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606519287","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2739146,0.0054772138,0.016433742,0.03963439,0.00033621956,0.00009745053,0.00033052906,0.00021707469,0.66355884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9075119,0.0007829759,0.0024633545,0.0034928937,0.000087680826,0.000085275926,0.000046388133,0.000053134372,0.085476376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99079305,0.0019884254,0.0005758571,0.0014612412,0.0021472771,0.0030340892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871701,0.005520164,0.0017611973,0.0021716505,0.0024116314,0.00096525677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062869373,0.0002465152,0.00035017662,0.0014880658,0.009661307,0.008922858,0.0015635197,0.0026460157,0.003593997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015615756,0.00059799897,0.0003461295,0.0016818246,0.03398986,0.005511642,0.0060210386,0.0065675154,0.00044242147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040597468,0.000019193792,0.0051040575,0.000042275682,0.000009354433,0.00033349375,0.02065447,0.00038081224,0.00046762684,0.94160897,0.005609344,0.025729802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057086614,0.00015969209,0.054917876,0.0008158573,0.00006646998,0.0008534528,0.02029999,0.0015237884,0.0021736578,0.13200746,0.7867668,0.00035784245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.739323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.818782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26067698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05445748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037372816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5244243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2742003287","doi":"","title":"Ikechi Mgbeoji, Collective Insecurity: Liberian Crisis, Unilateralism & Global Order","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unilateralism; Order (exchange); Political science; International law; Development economics; Political economy; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.01226709351679937,"score_gpt":0.2837545724333579,"score_spread":0.2714874789165585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2742003287","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.074530534,0.07888918,0.0055445465,0.30290014,0.001624057,0.00015051804,0.00055377005,0.000082456936,0.53572476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7906136,0.023399856,0.0043425704,0.059082966,0.00093388266,0.00032268057,0.000143788,0.00005085614,0.121109754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943894,0.00012546882,0.000035665933,0.00005900373,0.000129281,0.00021169946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947816,0.00032673322,0.00007225216,0.000024098033,0.0000676587,0.00003120969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014535298,0.00030780703,0.0002944598,0.0006619037,0.0061137667,0.0051355045,0.00082868536,0.008019251,0.007779932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020933005,0.00034177286,0.0002463728,0.00093468075,0.0049390583,0.005811113,0.0031248617,0.0056821182,0.00069343264],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005548029,0.00003815589,0.00092002586,0.00014286213,0.000011575437,0.00039121218,0.006864947,0.00012739364,0.00046562674,0.94452786,0.039713718,0.0067411577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014735351,0.000066089255,0.016636984,0.00060992775,0.00007902624,0.0006816989,0.02473337,0.0007877808,0.0024041154,0.42593068,0.52781284,0.00011006942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01909961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047579434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01909961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034612732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026504705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03797692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751192372","doi":"","title":"The Significance of the Systemic Relative Autonomy of Labour Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Labour law; Freedom of association; Labor relations; Doctrine; Autonomy; Industrial relations; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Humanities; Human rights; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017971541869034668,"score_gpt":0.2869949877568354,"score_spread":0.26902344588780075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751192372","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24828123,0.0075427503,0.122092314,0.049718164,0.00047918214,0.0000933515,0.0001571901,0.00023955165,0.5713963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880812,0.00070596347,0.0051393136,0.0009549199,0.00027166257,0.00004749345,0.000031886022,0.000024718498,0.0047428887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906149,0.003947905,0.0003850856,0.0018121306,0.0027079072,0.0005320784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98789513,0.0070730997,0.0012998972,0.0019803608,0.0011937427,0.00055771903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007355781,0.00017677312,0.0004128855,0.0016420753,0.0031960676,0.005743013,0.0010382205,0.0017915409,0.0028706437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011502602,0.0003423029,0.0005798001,0.0011660119,0.03767931,0.0070371903,0.0051822565,0.003758005,0.00037549695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043683335,0.000006622453,0.0007452332,0.000025506266,0.000005290576,0.000026356009,0.0024277421,0.00028028907,0.00028478066,0.99028987,0.0002648106,0.0056391596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011370816,0.00002322165,0.0033938426,0.00006724023,0.000009768204,0.000073977586,0.0014172955,0.0008373962,0.00027467826,0.9699767,0.02390192,0.000012552136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002733872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020250422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007355781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030104795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052443887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038901567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2754223474","doi":"","title":"On Being a Second: Grace Wambolt, Legal Professionalism and ‘Inter-Wave’ Feminism in Nova Scotia","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Humanities; Economic Justice; Political science; Feminism; Ethnology; Law; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.029856061047569195,"score_gpt":0.2965310434822352,"score_spread":0.266674982434666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2754223474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5868831,0.02016141,0.00037815358,0.19439857,0.0014303018,0.000045728902,0.0001480001,0.000033605505,0.19652107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.880735,0.0032465563,0.00020527928,0.011047216,0.00012920544,0.000020728201,0.000030884636,0.00004623846,0.10453885],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979194,0.00058922166,0.00002918086,0.0001937301,0.00034418,0.0009244144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99769163,0.00051902374,0.0002006067,0.00007721069,0.0003028461,0.0012087313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016520025,0.00029073682,0.00029236346,0.0011111478,0.028197765,0.0074739633,0.00089805183,0.002567311,0.0035455902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020333729,0.0003250002,0.00019280701,0.0010270341,0.016695926,0.0022485317,0.004423161,0.004260941,0.0004051018],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006731238,0.00003141214,0.0074814935,0.00007004575,0.0000074012096,0.0029351255,0.8741179,0.00006453508,0.00092992047,0.057296418,0.041183867,0.015814528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010374773,0.00003115332,0.028487198,0.00040027895,0.000007560272,0.0011873193,0.5764757,0.000073298506,0.00026931285,0.0031661165,0.38983884,0.000052811603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9043639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9653779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09563613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03479423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028536515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25245094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918042740","doi":"","title":"Social Membership: Animal Law beyond the Property/Personhood Impasse","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Oppression; Animal rights; Property (philosophy); Political science; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.0341325230237471,"score_gpt":0.2735632266385156,"score_spread":0.23943070361476854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2918042740","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14986075,0.008577463,0.0112651745,0.27346838,0.0006756977,0.00005990927,0.00010347732,0.00008067564,0.5559085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9369839,0.0018077024,0.0015902524,0.023632813,0.00025615867,0.00002776653,0.000028337488,0.000030688145,0.035642374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949356,0.0015511664,0.00008355678,0.00059539115,0.0013126316,0.0015217823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958034,0.0013712635,0.00033747318,0.00036806916,0.0011119253,0.0010077851],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051710736,0.00021921119,0.00041049093,0.0006776939,0.0131415585,0.010615753,0.0016545099,0.0063454453,0.004674866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057743937,0.00019778854,0.0003195358,0.0007154564,0.054195356,0.0045877625,0.0047124457,0.0069752475,0.0004462635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005820752,0.000010371349,0.0009511369,0.000014118047,0.000003411895,0.00010099268,0.008435627,0.00009400195,0.0001512716,0.9809107,0.004297514,0.0050248867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025186557,0.00006904997,0.009563049,0.000430107,0.00004350768,0.00021645876,0.022178037,0.0010401006,0.0007351534,0.41867334,0.54695493,0.000071059934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7058462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74065113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7058462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03503411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045344573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59177226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971457275","doi":"","title":"Air travel, accidents and injuries: why the new Montreal Convention is already outdated","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Political science; Law; Forensic engineering; Business; Engineering","score_opus":0.013939246481466586,"score_gpt":0.2908358932744592,"score_spread":0.2768966467929926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971457275","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0119436355,0.02105665,0.0013530821,0.8560066,0.0059625506,0.000028683535,0.00066500343,0.00009188015,0.10289197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35721213,0.017732184,0.0025639625,0.4968656,0.0104659,0.000117169715,0.0005894892,0.00019689473,0.114256665],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892259,0.0017576267,0.00045215132,0.0012481186,0.0047121164,0.002604003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98266673,0.004703158,0.0014463216,0.00075968594,0.006826834,0.0035972553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00966497,0.00053507957,0.00068971503,0.0014661611,0.009042403,0.015310933,0.0037488332,0.017703,0.017056921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023582406,0.00072581525,0.00081563793,0.0020550527,0.018205402,0.009105807,0.0048844204,0.018894276,0.001290877],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005457962,0.000058032754,0.005120604,0.00020349618,0.000047444653,0.00017105791,0.0034290943,0.0003977064,0.0003578349,0.39448187,0.5619812,0.03369705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045159137,0.00004604262,0.032448128,0.00085116894,0.000051083898,0.000121894576,0.004839346,0.000347141,0.0001968473,0.046904087,0.91391784,0.00023125832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8713684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9030962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12863159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036066018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.082338236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26167852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004119251","doi":"","title":"Disrupting Business as Usual: Considering Teaching Methods in Business Law Classrooms","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Business Law and Ethics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commercial law; Business as usual; Legal education; Business education; Law; Business; Political science; Sociology; Mathematics education; Economics; Higher education; Psychology; Management","score_opus":0.029948543677443557,"score_gpt":0.31617675250574273,"score_spread":0.2862282088282992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004119251","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6790586,0.0022154914,0.015220782,0.11992933,0.0010103425,0.0009984679,0.00006697565,0.0002234279,0.18127654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9602019,0.0008231102,0.010646142,0.010126231,0.0001251859,0.00058149686,0.000038849525,0.00010994813,0.017347142],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95958227,0.028427238,0.0005900861,0.0018256365,0.0038003912,0.00577436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9712389,0.0127736945,0.0011028023,0.0009448858,0.0028003063,0.011139454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03370752,0.0004042712,0.0005604527,0.0026324764,0.030226879,0.026466612,0.005412028,0.006014835,0.011182069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028612878,0.0006245837,0.00038208917,0.0019246497,0.019594494,0.012929677,0.014251924,0.009239994,0.0013734722],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075229924,0.00219691,0.009258037,0.00028713286,0.000009024693,0.00080939743,0.7767116,0.0002600287,0.0014975724,0.112272345,0.01227774,0.084345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005135827,0.00022015195,0.0026311225,0.00044845624,0.000006192831,0.00012533239,0.86830044,0.00046305507,0.0005676724,0.01703467,0.11012174,0.000029773451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03995016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13827275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03995016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030856168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036741678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2238782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010759745","doi":"","title":"Financial Responsibility Requirements for OilAnd Gas Activities Offshore Nova Scotiaand Newfoundland","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Marine and Offshore Engineering Studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova (rocket); Submarine pipeline; Finance; Business; Oceanography; Geology; Engineering; Aeronautics","score_opus":0.02139945807232363,"score_gpt":0.2569723301548197,"score_spread":0.23557287208249605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010759745","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17982548,0.001730801,0.0013264045,0.028462917,0.00059862016,0.0003269585,0.0023426078,0.00014547094,0.78524065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5514938,0.00141277,0.0015579809,0.009055387,0.00018640216,0.00020327936,0.0012863688,0.00007001764,0.434734],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934847,0.0004686513,0.00038271843,0.0003003994,0.0025581333,0.002805391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98059916,0.0053479974,0.0014774485,0.0009654253,0.009452699,0.0021571943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048526414,0.0004401296,0.0003467541,0.0021763076,0.008243252,0.0065444186,0.0016284961,0.005875924,0.013052609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020737927,0.0009720742,0.0005006803,0.0012320968,0.0018179658,0.0018560181,0.0026394892,0.0029854719,0.0016259296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005775957,0.00023398643,0.07725614,0.00041592662,0.000096931915,0.009093189,0.011697595,0.0066421637,0.008555597,0.3733835,0.44413137,0.0679159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000120690915,0.0001613071,0.19648796,0.0010454804,0.00012730213,0.0012973194,0.011287985,0.002234775,0.0035382635,0.009302336,0.77416754,0.00022887236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89322126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9477626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10677874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028975133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.061250445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21481514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010815349","doi":"","title":"Removing a \"Section 96\" Judge:An Historical Case Study","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Law; Legal history; International law; Political science; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.059065879564704014,"score_gpt":0.37600146429289255,"score_spread":0.31693558472818856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010815349","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70653564,0.0024094733,0.0027769865,0.061265215,0.0009352031,0.0002352907,0.0002950475,0.000062491075,0.22548464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8906403,0.0027741771,0.0015396097,0.03294467,0.000514812,0.00013336218,0.00014282738,0.00009496896,0.07121531],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941215,0.0019055809,0.00019705502,0.00071613194,0.0009678856,0.0020918315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98712665,0.008501115,0.0011935822,0.00050559576,0.0008823344,0.0017907063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008481862,0.00066443183,0.0006188561,0.0028198909,0.051441777,0.0065190336,0.00476675,0.02323725,0.010838194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025703287,0.0011182214,0.000578926,0.003465549,0.012580274,0.00470487,0.00531679,0.02748912,0.0013856865],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040887584,0.00232197,0.042475644,0.0004007347,0.000105013256,0.1372873,0.2562905,0.0019781827,0.0018776631,0.3546868,0.13398801,0.06817933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017038903,0.00084167084,0.033548303,0.0013877634,0.00028109658,0.035257112,0.38012418,0.0017172687,0.0050603785,0.031671606,0.50952214,0.00041810557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11435536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3169857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8856446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010653497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009574667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22737944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010839882","doi":"","title":"The Origins of a Coming Crisis: Renewal of theChurchill Falls Contract","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science; Law; Forensic engineering; Engineering","score_opus":0.01942082604207084,"score_gpt":0.3134432318212428,"score_spread":0.29402240577917194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010839882","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23404178,0.0016453842,0.004909871,0.17265186,0.0008826088,0.000111130495,0.0002500644,0.00009602971,0.58541125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93488914,0.00029686748,0.00066004787,0.0065446678,0.0001592189,0.0000402507,0.000039646893,0.000059816455,0.057310294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995458,0.0010374789,0.00014304044,0.00057718984,0.0010672347,0.001717195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949351,0.0013771271,0.00034308253,0.000613624,0.0010127679,0.0017182288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057994546,0.00022953692,0.00049852446,0.0010623807,0.017731389,0.016215585,0.002397326,0.010925311,0.020251587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016050573,0.00043784897,0.00039399753,0.0013054525,0.022354238,0.010630532,0.009956455,0.009445047,0.0009522367],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003793308,0.000028336342,0.0009320882,0.000011623922,0.0000033011895,0.0002630505,0.013057667,0.00013080593,0.000086184955,0.96145916,0.016250513,0.007739433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005245886,0.0000582862,0.006191533,0.00030740415,0.000015275735,0.00030436367,0.05186486,0.0015609774,0.00033005892,0.4963969,0.44282776,0.000090126014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18600604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24566676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81399393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021638589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037558496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3698467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010901749","doi":"","title":"Effective and Efficient Regulation of the Offshore Oil Industry:The 2001 White Rose Public Review Process","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Marine and Offshore Engineering Studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"White (mutation); Rose (mathematics); White paper; Submarine pipeline; Business; Process (computing); Legislation; Engineering; Law; Political science; Computer science; Chemistry; Mathematics","score_opus":0.00833438428284983,"score_gpt":0.21773972171672812,"score_spread":0.2094053374338783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010901749","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.078116775,0.0054570907,0.01778041,0.503032,0.0018362638,0.0008986468,0.00023280477,0.00031399034,0.392332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65510297,0.0032256213,0.008125804,0.16704237,0.0034192987,0.0011040195,0.00014196393,0.0001940963,0.16164383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9148011,0.03172859,0.003429951,0.0064074756,0.032054495,0.011578409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.76226074,0.17821178,0.01174119,0.0110877445,0.032105625,0.004592861],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09375913,0.00063547585,0.0010559105,0.003824186,0.016847456,0.02429377,0.0034156602,0.030940821,0.007000443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18174833,0.0016997439,0.001107559,0.0023462789,0.012805935,0.011184399,0.008588713,0.01669969,0.0023474256],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010618792,0.00026635904,0.0031394286,0.00022755883,0.00007284129,0.0007228271,0.0074056285,0.0017393638,0.0022476672,0.7313867,0.20456517,0.048120268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024434086,0.00023316544,0.021536881,0.0007728736,0.00017228752,0.00024669396,0.006726767,0.00428537,0.006580141,0.15232176,0.8064919,0.00038777187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06104703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1141511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.938953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021597732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07499986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49585158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010910245","doi":"","title":"Designating the Dean of Law: Legal Education at McGill University andthe Montreal Corporate and Professional Elite, 1946-1950.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Elite; Law; Legal education; Legal profession; Political science; Sociology; Management; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.016817071686618494,"score_gpt":0.23010280630304647,"score_spread":0.21328573461642797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010910245","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13229156,0.08742168,0.0014866088,0.5834626,0.0038099599,0.0002537961,0.0023538677,0.00024518115,0.18867481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5155628,0.009928768,0.00096139504,0.015239307,0.0005988693,0.00007112227,0.00018671952,0.000066340435,0.45738477],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99664295,0.0006942837,0.00007077669,0.00030736666,0.0006452735,0.0016394067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99314934,0.0007094465,0.00054051634,0.000102227,0.0014606939,0.004037812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033631695,0.00045011065,0.00025482755,0.001693397,0.020935243,0.0050617275,0.0017741438,0.003055005,0.031014752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009454229,0.00059745123,0.00019488987,0.0026398958,0.007957318,0.0032217274,0.003692823,0.0024904215,0.0013428995],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009884827,0.000115782204,0.031400032,0.00022466319,0.000013178726,0.00044582458,0.047776476,0.00033646266,0.00069014425,0.21934359,0.6200427,0.07951225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021647853,0.000028380498,0.07288338,0.00018062077,0.0000092258,0.00007945469,0.013955057,0.00009997111,0.0005213428,0.0023462046,0.9098223,0.000052550913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95393276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99409026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8613017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13869828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15174359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010971666","doi":"","title":"Independence and the Director ofPublic Prosecutions: The Marshall Inquiryand Beyond","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.01375980048465353,"score_gpt":0.27270714850265143,"score_spread":0.2589473480179979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010971666","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05751962,0.011756964,0.0020695764,0.40106305,0.0009877884,0.000047632722,0.00012366458,0.00004605091,0.52638566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8008499,0.0039893584,0.0004182062,0.044543505,0.0024345214,0.000073259675,0.000040114784,0.00008978617,0.14756133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930385,0.0020655652,0.00018835052,0.0008217618,0.0010990072,0.0027868901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98521405,0.009036538,0.0012269226,0.0011831459,0.0013334566,0.0020057664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010011467,0.0005568967,0.0010872409,0.0022860235,0.01786953,0.015287614,0.0017069515,0.01480119,0.02508055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024636611,0.0009306711,0.00058415334,0.0021825605,0.031828955,0.014012273,0.008981493,0.01537491,0.0018382077],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054576325,0.000051404986,0.0012914421,0.000038347564,0.000014300442,0.00021511107,0.006106089,0.00009537106,0.00010412384,0.9172771,0.064164385,0.010587901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008698984,0.000049191654,0.0056469366,0.00039631818,0.00006438369,0.0002191321,0.014958598,0.00027878326,0.00071962294,0.53299564,0.4444723,0.00011214706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08834652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1352896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98587096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014129034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023166422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17566454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011019483","doi":"","title":"Brightening the Covenant Chain: Aboriginal TreatyMeanings in Law and History After Marshall","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Legal history; Law; International law; Political science; Chain (unit)","score_opus":0.01190556242959798,"score_gpt":0.2522090899315924,"score_spread":0.24030352750199444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011019483","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06853253,0.023504552,0.0013698634,0.408334,0.0034984625,0.00008542765,0.00008220968,0.00009164061,0.49450135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45046535,0.0041254302,0.0006131325,0.037791394,0.0007707082,0.0000675589,0.000012247923,0.0001196997,0.50603443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980709,0.00064363546,0.000047422258,0.00024684542,0.00029503912,0.0006961383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977805,0.0012660325,0.00012470648,0.00013322927,0.00027451638,0.0004210221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032745325,0.00039567062,0.00048659043,0.00090506056,0.034002163,0.013416737,0.001322938,0.00843012,0.01375174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007547459,0.0005136149,0.0003034449,0.0011077009,0.025489293,0.009452398,0.0068302723,0.015248492,0.0006654064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023237575,0.000013499454,0.00029116267,0.000042082625,0.000003977103,0.00022979546,0.06750997,0.000040813404,0.00013508837,0.8690229,0.055820283,0.00686725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013684567,0.000023143031,0.0016388486,0.0002551381,0.0000160786,0.000096325246,0.074570455,0.00011189526,0.00037548353,0.097752,0.82508373,0.00006325718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49211758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69946665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5078824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021672266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02212584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97850627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011027392","doi":"","title":"Welcomed Participants' or 'Environmental Vigilantes'?The CEPA Environmental Protection Action and theRole Of Citizen Suits in Federal Environmental Law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Action (physics); Political science; Environmental law; Environmental protection; Geography","score_opus":0.051198315684278316,"score_gpt":0.2692325831660606,"score_spread":0.21803426748178226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011027392","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11947832,0.0013441036,0.0046625915,0.54760754,0.0038323523,0.00015669098,0.000101074525,0.00007903617,0.32273838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87138236,0.00028009014,0.00060552167,0.07148421,0.00088201324,0.00018411412,0.000016183087,0.00006468847,0.055100895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97349066,0.014187192,0.00046761733,0.0025007706,0.002397933,0.006955836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9635381,0.023808945,0.0024182498,0.0019191602,0.003432139,0.0048834947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03578508,0.00044320873,0.0007750301,0.0009984691,0.029091539,0.022507943,0.0035183993,0.041796096,0.016565142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08773917,0.00093388575,0.0005297551,0.0011240552,0.021887926,0.022295883,0.0088606365,0.02365191,0.0010800713],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062936124,0.00008901838,0.0020930718,0.000055329252,0.000014484256,0.0006367788,0.06700393,0.00007009598,0.00030013063,0.8469314,0.06949911,0.013243736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000135423,0.00016347288,0.010128361,0.00062418217,0.000103774604,0.0004073268,0.2515358,0.00058783405,0.0012407764,0.27478558,0.46010426,0.00018313246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044321463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.105388366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9556785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008911216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016592687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18925184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011049206","doi":"","title":"Key Issues in the New Regime of Occupational Health and Safety: The Right to RefuseWork and Directors' and Officers' Liability","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Occupational Health and Safety Research","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Key (lock); Business; Law; Political science; Accounting; Computer security","score_opus":0.0477741254491085,"score_gpt":0.4278900351905102,"score_spread":0.38011590974140175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011049206","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02708372,0.0042587128,0.013381893,0.60803336,0.005012179,0.00015986119,0.00022218365,0.00007987516,0.34176818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56535923,0.00272481,0.009079202,0.28652835,0.016006835,0.00083605637,0.00010005106,0.00014186394,0.11922358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9668182,0.009650705,0.0023544033,0.005986981,0.009820835,0.0053687994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95569116,0.03182389,0.0022713086,0.0037857674,0.0037704562,0.00265751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039224323,0.00071460224,0.001996805,0.0015915562,0.016674107,0.025523402,0.0061022136,0.06407428,0.010980448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056522164,0.0019634566,0.0019740625,0.0012915479,0.056435745,0.021495996,0.007883279,0.05420589,0.0017128487],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021366832,0.000035654084,0.00018379204,0.000013915721,0.0000045018,0.000068434594,0.0010713505,0.000060908627,0.00009471186,0.98700935,0.009657727,0.0017782997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017151234,0.00007867031,0.0013530614,0.0002897045,0.000034364974,0.00020627303,0.0017412571,0.00060769997,0.00037498985,0.8466504,0.14836466,0.00012747307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027115587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028965231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9728844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011250102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0196665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20744056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011166540","doi":"","title":"Drainage Issues in the Atlantic CanadaOffshore Petroleum Industry","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Petroleum Processing and Analysis","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Petroleum; Drainage; Petroleum industry; Legislation; Business; Petroleum engineering; Geology; Law; Environmental science; Political science; Environmental engineering","score_opus":0.01249237229095617,"score_gpt":0.25402236768218805,"score_spread":0.24152999539123188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011166540","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3641523,0.0036665057,0.0012193471,0.17140947,0.00046424728,0.00010957778,0.0007770828,0.000109208566,0.45809218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81485826,0.0032369846,0.00069998164,0.031265404,0.00016537875,0.000026438958,0.00018417672,0.000068489724,0.14949481],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959935,0.00019953909,0.00007707355,0.00018079882,0.0017351523,0.0018139294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99243486,0.0013025685,0.00039858534,0.00014740233,0.004073833,0.0016428051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017520423,0.00020703333,0.0003035829,0.0019956126,0.023254123,0.009943198,0.0020264979,0.00706211,0.012588486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008392143,0.0005279117,0.00042288363,0.0034477632,0.0071712,0.0019229237,0.0033164124,0.005638288,0.0005624008],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026585307,0.00032232312,0.124696694,0.00028567415,0.00008723557,0.005719191,0.014928262,0.0037213834,0.00326045,0.41864514,0.28817156,0.13989626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000079261816,0.000068351095,0.12760755,0.00044573192,0.000099475685,0.0006428871,0.047228556,0.002750399,0.0020800452,0.029964665,0.78884333,0.00018980188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9875265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9961119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08932861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08932861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17490989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64812744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011181201","doi":"","title":"Getting Their Feet Wet: The SupremeCourt and the Practical Implementationof Treaty Rights in the Marshall Case","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Eluvium; Geology; Geochemistry","score_opus":0.05018143380917115,"score_gpt":0.2543966475283737,"score_spread":0.20421521371920257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011181201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07554629,0.0033410029,0.026734894,0.16145046,0.00086217996,0.00009153554,0.00007722103,0.00007419322,0.73182225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94812906,0.00067071436,0.0028654684,0.010697633,0.00057595153,0.00012547137,0.000020264833,0.00007981556,0.036835562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9833792,0.008805135,0.00040564095,0.0016567686,0.001989653,0.0037636207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99134046,0.005502493,0.00055740273,0.0015317213,0.0006193912,0.00044849346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020362902,0.00056033436,0.0010660859,0.0010858973,0.015959414,0.013643257,0.0036433064,0.021811713,0.015208476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034279674,0.00087589154,0.0009915744,0.0012849977,0.043489493,0.019216608,0.009849656,0.02010055,0.0008649613],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070141564,0.000007997151,0.00004344799,0.000004038846,0.0000023835055,0.000038618353,0.000877985,0.00007648054,0.000026239913,0.99637634,0.001609854,0.00092963164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002965877,0.000008241458,0.00014124317,0.000050124,0.000007920413,0.000025412897,0.0012087986,0.00035168487,0.00012707662,0.97667295,0.021358825,0.000018010907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029055715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04216155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9709443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009472031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011079076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10769057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011307461","doi":"","title":"Imposing Self-Interest: Behavioural Law and Economics, theUltimatum Game, and Value Possibilities","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Value (mathematics); Self-interest; Law; Law and economics; Positive economics; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02724120270932362,"score_gpt":0.22073243754905897,"score_spread":0.19349123483973535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011307461","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50128835,0.002455684,0.12136268,0.046843987,0.00018351863,0.00012905303,0.000232028,0.000075710814,0.327429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904839,0.00034318175,0.0022536286,0.0006339032,0.00006982574,0.00004227809,0.000016404716,0.00000910421,0.0061478806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974171,0.0014219374,0.00008080734,0.0002000226,0.000392374,0.0004877593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921868,0.0055720573,0.00065071636,0.00057090184,0.00047616646,0.00054324453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004567072,0.00050320197,0.0008860485,0.00074047,0.0021700829,0.008086475,0.0014514392,0.004498179,0.007369588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011087992,0.00045479406,0.00065930793,0.00081863767,0.011512234,0.0073193577,0.0026376923,0.004435487,0.00030400173],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010003893,0.00001832029,0.00023661449,0.0000054418965,0.0000031552795,0.00002251928,0.000077916084,0.00072559254,0.000033455824,0.99768233,0.00025873265,0.0009259703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012691698,0.0000057964703,0.00024243447,0.000007578906,0.0000027221504,0.000011673779,0.000093125505,0.0034584638,0.00003558056,0.99550736,0.00061763334,0.000004921671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008676027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010827367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008676027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053905877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003582945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039111614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011321608","doi":"","title":"Slow on the Trigger: The Department of Fisheries and Oceans, theFisheries Act and the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fishery; Environmental law; Business; Environmental planning; Environmental protection; Political science; Law; Environmental science","score_opus":0.0147561664357298,"score_gpt":0.2561851339897758,"score_spread":0.24142896755404603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011321608","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016117742,0.006391675,0.0015673724,0.65216327,0.0060548265,0.0002570912,0.0018562966,0.00020199132,0.3153898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17869215,0.0043012197,0.0024187185,0.49411842,0.0019666052,0.0004391107,0.0006359968,0.0002423682,0.31718543],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9845462,0.0010122396,0.0004659996,0.001279531,0.007868057,0.0048280964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9845583,0.005314893,0.0007368435,0.0005142271,0.0064427485,0.0024330441],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011016288,0.0014314518,0.001174575,0.0020690332,0.020201428,0.018006574,0.004851677,0.04859048,0.011551325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044816814,0.0014647718,0.0011959478,0.0033176169,0.008749254,0.0063174707,0.005406333,0.02641339,0.0017814526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008563387,0.000043412943,0.0022120257,0.000042682295,0.000037403886,0.00019418239,0.0021355175,0.000528292,0.000272659,0.4281853,0.5584305,0.007832386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014951122,0.000035575045,0.012082822,0.000376668,0.00012695171,0.000075600714,0.0042017126,0.0012169612,0.00041621737,0.045646027,0.93537045,0.0003015418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9789621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98813117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.068614624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.068614624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24172372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4978363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011341383","doi":"","title":"Reconceptualizing Professional Responsibility:Incorporating Equality","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Professional responsibility; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.11993809460788485,"score_gpt":0.4005033235033196,"score_spread":0.2805652288954347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011341383","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06225744,0.0014657958,0.35989943,0.13490759,0.00097106124,0.00024579754,0.00004758209,0.00030553233,0.43989968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9381694,0.0003210254,0.047160015,0.0036049034,0.00015951127,0.00013733459,0.000020934103,0.00009975318,0.010327192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95792615,0.028046984,0.0011303893,0.0032005878,0.005995902,0.0037000661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96229416,0.018434437,0.002562575,0.007234416,0.0053712158,0.0041031097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039362576,0.00068538357,0.0008004187,0.0024333608,0.010326764,0.01553025,0.004092345,0.0073576407,0.006716932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0615263,0.0007944987,0.0008372315,0.0011158123,0.04160312,0.018905027,0.019772438,0.006984359,0.00081428443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001529833,0.000092806986,0.0009973886,0.00006414247,0.000019444145,0.00007579166,0.023792135,0.001461399,0.00017934966,0.93539363,0.003884885,0.034023754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022968548,0.000029246035,0.000611529,0.00016569355,0.000020660746,0.000055917233,0.0072273584,0.0022630016,0.00041686432,0.9505831,0.03857257,0.000031120693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013551959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017556254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039362576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010776136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040917553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20817173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011356480","doi":"","title":"Regulatory Regime: Canada-Newfoundland/Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Board Issues","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Submarine pipeline; Petroleum; Oceanography; Environmental science; Fishery; Political science; Geology; Paleontology","score_opus":0.01570200130615071,"score_gpt":0.269986284124776,"score_spread":0.25428428281862525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011356480","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15717785,0.0053547793,0.001062186,0.21296236,0.0025914523,0.0004651554,0.002841031,0.00020379211,0.61734146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47586423,0.0035362833,0.0017583726,0.10992604,0.00052252813,0.00021629651,0.00084908237,0.00016232367,0.40716478],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98716694,0.00071699964,0.0005266765,0.0012241019,0.0046796114,0.005685633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98318154,0.0037857315,0.001095516,0.00052382733,0.008232312,0.0031811043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008314665,0.0005721486,0.00078189006,0.003550828,0.021531736,0.018790847,0.0037997696,0.014737176,0.01313485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019324014,0.0010889511,0.0010889502,0.0040885704,0.005116993,0.0026869501,0.0032632994,0.0080005415,0.0011886129],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041561516,0.00026940365,0.0414838,0.00042668876,0.0002299527,0.003259789,0.0077551743,0.0021957322,0.003478171,0.33610705,0.56057674,0.043801922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024075518,0.00011295639,0.15863986,0.0010307917,0.00028542735,0.00041995817,0.010971898,0.0013793674,0.002260518,0.0068573034,0.81749266,0.00030846402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9889242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9955914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13655943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13655943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25075802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9908126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011379414","doi":"","title":"Oceans Act: Uncharted Seas For OffshoreDevelopment In Atlantic Canada?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Oceanography; International law; International waters; Law of the sea; Political science; Law; Territorial waters; Fishery; Public international law; Geology; Biology","score_opus":0.0250910467909934,"score_gpt":0.2907167739443897,"score_spread":0.26562572715339633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011379414","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22952917,0.0030581665,0.0009305003,0.2203799,0.0007040954,0.000057565565,0.0009276225,0.000052198004,0.54436076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83388436,0.002362111,0.0006719623,0.04051097,0.00016078996,0.000048027578,0.00018549306,0.000056267218,0.122120015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973815,0.00018175766,0.000069268404,0.00015250455,0.00073786377,0.0014770201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954384,0.0006569873,0.00026436662,0.00020852042,0.0017718116,0.0016599256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019560524,0.00026479596,0.00029148842,0.00086819933,0.01555699,0.010236154,0.0015225607,0.0068876194,0.011906087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007614869,0.0003583668,0.00051453564,0.0013554662,0.008131625,0.0032128904,0.0047664694,0.0061655287,0.00063438807],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010455814,0.000040062103,0.026232012,0.00006707105,0.000034343717,0.00060474296,0.010623747,0.00080157,0.00040565067,0.84823626,0.09120618,0.02164381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007434117,0.000044425993,0.06587746,0.00051838,0.00013284863,0.00016485808,0.052789137,0.0011423237,0.00077986595,0.097698994,0.7805868,0.0001905642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.985429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9937801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04720603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04720603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2142171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34250534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011420462","doi":"","title":"Securing Assets of Oil and Gas ProjectsOffshore Nova Scotia","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Economic, financial, and policy analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Fossil fuel; Business; Petroleum engineering; Environmental science; Geology; Engineering; Waste management; Oceanography","score_opus":0.03012168449741693,"score_gpt":0.23854817854993235,"score_spread":0.20842649405251543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011420462","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9640083,0.00042731667,0.000401198,0.001597788,0.000026677431,0.00006283219,0.00087139517,0.000016338565,0.03258822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904985,0.00025750487,0.00019313006,0.00012235747,0.000010564106,0.000012849375,0.000225779,0.0000030977035,0.008676287],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907994,0.00007537336,0.000041071107,0.00004248142,0.0003348993,0.0004261492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99508166,0.00070910575,0.0012987688,0.00019720943,0.001611332,0.0011018998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010170891,0.00019682493,0.00019805877,0.0014136443,0.0014437786,0.0026007995,0.000585131,0.00070214295,0.0020031198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075422,0.00022828889,0.00013895734,0.0009832226,0.00059218286,0.0006902632,0.0013186892,0.0007709952,0.00025088855],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037671012,0.00012072735,0.8587723,0.00012834299,0.00008690964,0.0035714705,0.0022923541,0.0093210125,0.0037829261,0.036316216,0.017925251,0.0673058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054006952,0.00017798472,0.9333311,0.00021672093,0.00006425765,0.00057254254,0.0043012295,0.012813129,0.00432034,0.006458764,0.037639435,0.00005050129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68592995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87771606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31407005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00857399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018134126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6318393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011425559","doi":"","title":"After the Revolution: Being Pragmatic and Functional in Canada's TrialCourts and Courts of Appeal","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.020031224354271904,"score_gpt":0.23854932586225394,"score_spread":0.21851810150798204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011425559","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14713326,0.003346601,0.004582668,0.41079435,0.0018266089,0.00025736736,0.0002625521,0.00014255813,0.43165407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8647765,0.00044480836,0.001624676,0.062061623,0.0003957832,0.00011280422,0.00006370382,0.00019398956,0.07032619],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93385404,0.017634507,0.0013142244,0.005690282,0.016810235,0.024696767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93843275,0.022710191,0.0023048902,0.0032581096,0.018959422,0.014334766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048124522,0.0006465393,0.0015998122,0.003311302,0.08140901,0.046271052,0.006649716,0.031909075,0.011269664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.112830155,0.0014263449,0.0011757347,0.0047650128,0.074713096,0.012844712,0.013836732,0.033619415,0.0008776217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000104203136,0.00005662736,0.0031239467,0.000054224896,0.000035738412,0.00029287045,0.051558822,0.00027751143,0.00019335913,0.8761891,0.051252812,0.016860783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022640856,0.00011883166,0.020925153,0.0005514938,0.00021688303,0.0001528016,0.08599367,0.0009153811,0.000713211,0.2359175,0.65390444,0.00036431215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95424026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9766043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83494407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16505592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.39478633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9684168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011448780","doi":"","title":"Du Dialogue au Monologue - Un Commentairesur I'arrêt R. v. Marshall","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023185370692789073,"score_gpt":0.265400114882008,"score_spread":0.2422147441892189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011448780","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015782064,0.030254178,0.005181287,0.64227074,0.011858411,0.000043720134,0.00014642141,0.00019660528,0.2942665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5407327,0.01184023,0.002580723,0.106354445,0.008383634,0.00017682488,0.00010749609,0.00049189467,0.32933205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885894,0.006755095,0.00026802512,0.00093939254,0.0023176216,0.0011305563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903655,0.006048673,0.0004056708,0.00064847094,0.0018236525,0.0007079644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008113872,0.00069540075,0.0005995933,0.001057894,0.015460701,0.0106609715,0.0017584256,0.009757924,0.012115112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034226242,0.00043504796,0.00042728832,0.00098004,0.0100519415,0.009483124,0.0063687526,0.013024469,0.002045614],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000090634836,0.00003532912,0.0002999704,0.00016297273,0.00001182608,0.00069017406,0.032640364,0.000099302444,0.0006914732,0.61071795,0.33187538,0.022684647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015025859,0.000017328071,0.00041652148,0.00024951505,0.000007755233,0.00017588808,0.011703456,0.00010879755,0.0006772155,0.033377707,0.95322233,0.000028564582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07159584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06398809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92840415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013186308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009531759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14235824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011481634","doi":"","title":"Are Royalty Agreements Required ForCanada East Coast Offshore Oil And Gas","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Marine and Offshore Engineering Studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Submarine pipeline; Offshore oil and gas; Fossil fuel; East coast; Business; Petroleum; International law; Fishery; Geology; Law; Oceanography; Political science; Engineering; Paleontology; Waste management","score_opus":0.013063437442558478,"score_gpt":0.20700157660328022,"score_spread":0.19393813916072175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011481634","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14204606,0.0009585594,0.00195675,0.033788614,0.00095969037,0.0001223272,0.00040089237,0.00020499963,0.8195621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7563392,0.0009174576,0.0016514962,0.016812019,0.0002697007,0.000167249,0.00037141304,0.00009564861,0.22337584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98809963,0.0013383132,0.00065288675,0.0010498315,0.0048832996,0.0039760983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95444036,0.019108338,0.005293023,0.004654124,0.013365684,0.0031384088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010574793,0.00027117995,0.00060859305,0.0013615426,0.011346198,0.010641672,0.0017462956,0.01328206,0.031134062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041536167,0.0010410144,0.0006042093,0.0011279183,0.005616962,0.009399549,0.0038054723,0.0065375185,0.0071487194],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039239795,0.00024144305,0.0140611995,0.00030877208,0.000059472295,0.0020350565,0.0059664967,0.0010266051,0.0023314299,0.7654478,0.1703884,0.037740998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018848559,0.000112519956,0.042062454,0.0006568845,0.000110398774,0.0008156969,0.016437309,0.0012666254,0.0052693784,0.09739171,0.8354378,0.00025072796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.104606345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19705829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89539367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010321302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02970746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20799488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011719764","doi":"","title":"Offshore Petroleum in Australia - Cooperative Governance in aSea of Federalism","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Natural Resources and Economic Development","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Submarine pipeline; Federalism; Petroleum; Oil spill; Political science; Geology; Petroleum engineering; Law; Oceanography; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.0300458452809575,"score_gpt":0.23561046335565497,"score_spread":0.20556461807469747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011719764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8874394,0.00026662674,0.00073868793,0.006667917,0.000012559994,0.000023993638,0.00005461903,0.000008957153,0.1047872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99101347,0.00011373742,0.00012723029,0.00025408727,0.000004381643,0.000007587446,0.000008812502,0.0000013631319,0.008469335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994381,0.00013653754,0.000023352293,0.00005718135,0.00010663584,0.00023816885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826896,0.00038487057,0.00036638827,0.00013385116,0.0003978894,0.0004479963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092175894,0.00006533946,0.000119211465,0.0004349818,0.0024033699,0.0025641238,0.0003415185,0.0014471386,0.0030425482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00294791,0.00013937375,0.00014364191,0.0007251114,0.0018762051,0.0016276033,0.0020270573,0.00096402667,0.00013316784],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013990844,0.00022408599,0.16190132,0.00010302614,0.00007317641,0.0039187605,0.020102814,0.004834019,0.0024683115,0.74636924,0.017438855,0.04242637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005084181,0.00016983158,0.6744999,0.00022977925,0.000098101424,0.0008782143,0.04056592,0.011640388,0.0011579641,0.10055495,0.17006332,0.000090792346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21343596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44987974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21343596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045400886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070340117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42438722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011755897","doi":"","title":"The Thousandth Man: A Biography ofJames McGregor Stewart by Barry Cahill","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biography; Legal history; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.004559164335872751,"score_gpt":0.21361988693176007,"score_spread":0.20906072259588732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011755897","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003404977,0.17801869,0.00066106644,0.6381722,0.026387412,0.000028634526,0.000100364676,0.000056568737,0.15317003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.045244124,0.09461712,0.00065789436,0.12803541,0.007308495,0.000069802714,0.000062200925,0.00024087899,0.72376406],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790835,0.00075058406,0.00006389987,0.00024406088,0.0006334605,0.00039967254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998348,0.0006609279,0.00009076945,0.000073521354,0.00041807577,0.00040860806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025483754,0.0009419408,0.000706178,0.0020846603,0.020903304,0.008787831,0.0012428955,0.0056408094,0.018085107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004393615,0.00082884135,0.00030588591,0.0023476568,0.009714359,0.011119292,0.005069706,0.011657789,0.0034472307],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008982512,0.000017523855,0.00012802125,0.00005156258,0.0000033640824,0.0000945869,0.012909186,0.00001725487,0.00005276079,0.04923786,0.9232016,0.014277302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.468845e-7,0.0000022358092,0.00011112884,0.000109914305,9.71858e-7,0.000036033925,0.004185749,0.0000052960754,0.000018136769,0.0015173911,0.994007,0.0000052046676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17609231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41838846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8239077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012020934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013263893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35013473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011774774","doi":"","title":"Walking the Centre Line: Balancing an Employee's Right to Privacy in Drug andAlcohol Policies in the Atlantic Offshore Oil Industry","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Right whale; Petroleum industry; Line (geometry); Business; Right to privacy; Submarine pipeline; Internet privacy; Law; Engineering; Political science; Computer science; Fishery","score_opus":0.018885409040244484,"score_gpt":0.29919442617670855,"score_spread":0.28030901713646406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011774774","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5728845,0.00050091173,0.0037403973,0.23551856,0.00019319421,0.000078351,0.00005007176,0.00001990923,0.18701407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9779228,0.0001612514,0.0005372187,0.011175286,0.000053140695,0.000020720665,0.0000056429526,0.000008681013,0.010115174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887311,0.0043705306,0.00032592527,0.0006375078,0.0013705736,0.004564396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9776808,0.016183252,0.0012077483,0.00086418766,0.0016672347,0.002396714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015299608,0.00020130664,0.00037501918,0.0008493966,0.025542594,0.0136925755,0.002132275,0.022063864,0.007283104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031421125,0.0004621831,0.0005695373,0.00082461763,0.020079533,0.007394694,0.0076219533,0.012514548,0.0004642606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023486707,0.0002142882,0.016153615,0.000050916504,0.000032755594,0.0017131658,0.07871493,0.0009103462,0.00091698545,0.85967076,0.01951262,0.021874752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022918399,0.00024717205,0.02447575,0.0006223412,0.00023185823,0.0006672765,0.32002893,0.0039063985,0.0037588198,0.48615712,0.15940146,0.00027378666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20264801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31961766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20264801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012114735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039706256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40293694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011900156","doi":"","title":"Was Amerindian Dispossession Lawful? TheResponse of 19th-Century Maritime Intellectuals","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Colonialism, slavery, and trade","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Legal history; Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.013817810448962686,"score_gpt":0.28761396643765863,"score_spread":0.27379615598869594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011900156","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47217467,0.004488898,0.0003994405,0.117679395,0.0005970762,0.000013095156,0.000041986867,0.000017403047,0.40458807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96693355,0.00072826823,0.00007654005,0.007802106,0.0001466312,0.00000639256,0.000006869409,0.00000799451,0.024291541],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989814,0.00021753434,0.000016867973,0.00011632087,0.00014489928,0.0005228116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997747,0.0010035444,0.0002069717,0.00014716983,0.00041834242,0.0004770029],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026314973,0.000128497,0.00017922046,0.00083213893,0.011321223,0.0072992113,0.00069141696,0.002723213,0.008885961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048898677,0.00015823965,0.00013768443,0.0008103638,0.030810356,0.005417593,0.0029254286,0.005825165,0.00032110605],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048022433,0.00004658784,0.005270932,0.000028295162,0.000008382137,0.00045087613,0.18490423,0.000028177757,0.00047178785,0.77839595,0.014409631,0.015937163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003970569,0.000049593742,0.017418051,0.00029573997,0.000019269848,0.00045592943,0.20409602,0.00014915678,0.0006217807,0.11969123,0.6571195,0.00004397715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07450005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.122431636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07450005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009105541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007196421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14813286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011915343","doi":"","title":"Competition, Cooperation or Cartel: A NationalLaw School Accreditation Process for Canada?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Educational Practices and Policies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cartel; Accreditation; Competition (biology); Process (computing); Business; Competition law; Political science; International trade; Law; Industrial organization; Economics; Market economy; Computer science; Collusion","score_opus":0.03301970044027016,"score_gpt":0.3592491671544645,"score_spread":0.32622946671419434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011915343","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12914155,0.0027100558,0.0027721555,0.48734325,0.0009930556,0.00026605243,0.00044116194,0.00021337849,0.3761194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8040624,0.00090194197,0.0032813342,0.056335475,0.00021024735,0.00012452551,0.00014772716,0.00013507398,0.13480124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.975109,0.002579084,0.0004709204,0.0019360931,0.0079363985,0.011968478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96110237,0.0076363855,0.0011500347,0.0010792346,0.014217736,0.014814226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018521193,0.0005179521,0.00094782125,0.0025650617,0.047067843,0.023453875,0.004525967,0.02457757,0.02388167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044109557,0.0010473876,0.0011222,0.0031636157,0.0155491065,0.010870509,0.0072033266,0.0130518535,0.0015373849],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001224291,0.00022715863,0.014737852,0.00010720721,0.0000360987,0.00030298546,0.012278927,0.00081638165,0.0004253168,0.68527615,0.23884499,0.046824507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019007928,0.00018068436,0.06803514,0.00094895327,0.00016141239,0.0002433819,0.06504901,0.005241068,0.0011925055,0.11531425,0.7427829,0.00066063233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98761916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99548376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8430195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15698051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5156466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9777831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011946407","doi":"","title":"Need Intellectual Property Be Everywhere?Against Ubiquity and Uniformity","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Property law; Political science; Law; Business; Economics; Property rights; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03940575782523388,"score_gpt":0.21123827419608204,"score_spread":0.17183251637084818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011946407","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13875897,0.011013651,0.041540943,0.24311174,0.0015159231,0.00014152647,0.00029154646,0.00024510574,0.56338054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9542048,0.0012682762,0.004414965,0.023716614,0.0014519809,0.00018343132,0.000054546865,0.00012931385,0.01457607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98361593,0.005042127,0.0009788092,0.004630224,0.0040584276,0.0016743783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94467807,0.029334417,0.004551982,0.01374265,0.005729969,0.001962911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018731335,0.00052507507,0.0020671624,0.0026027854,0.01200062,0.013730092,0.0025823407,0.01685169,0.009546595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05313831,0.001171366,0.0012776788,0.0021551237,0.069238536,0.044809435,0.0123972865,0.016148265,0.0014133467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002812532,0.00001546193,0.0006139132,0.000022592243,0.00001259011,0.00006251508,0.00092822284,0.000072976305,0.00006155297,0.9912548,0.0025591212,0.0043680747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051477127,0.000037552833,0.0014024175,0.00014388692,0.000036353813,0.000234868,0.0017756493,0.0003921306,0.00028351898,0.9543391,0.04126605,0.000037087695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073322095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006353541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018731335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054362784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042883973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.099061966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011947477","doi":"","title":"The Dartmouth Schools Question and the Supreme Court ofNova Scotia","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Legal history; Nova scotia; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.012767360362670406,"score_gpt":0.2688707710326621,"score_spread":0.2561034106699917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011947477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31069508,0.0060050613,0.00037360878,0.22292788,0.00127903,0.00007073151,0.00040160507,0.000030454394,0.4582166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85528886,0.0007191395,0.00018895754,0.042928465,0.00037516459,0.000043827917,0.00005773435,0.000034832134,0.10036293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99467236,0.00081013516,0.00010396009,0.0006696829,0.00074973283,0.0029940961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929213,0.0031547653,0.00040275653,0.00031966317,0.0011402307,0.0020613447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038603274,0.0002664639,0.0007249211,0.0013041028,0.036914006,0.01502857,0.0021457798,0.015183406,0.01706076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014272672,0.0008751558,0.00049663655,0.0014953534,0.01112686,0.00380119,0.0064205965,0.013431604,0.0009472372],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020986478,0.00008683432,0.012687506,0.0000884775,0.000050881426,0.0029009758,0.024369929,0.0003479863,0.0007439927,0.8044922,0.14486685,0.0091545535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029422124,0.000100837206,0.083323464,0.0011938574,0.00015054003,0.0006800047,0.06603437,0.0012045074,0.0015282533,0.16074668,0.6844658,0.00027744373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83268976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9401736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16731024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036612876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044888876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33659106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012025403","doi":"","title":"The Allocation of Civil Liability for Damage to the Marine Environmentin the New Canadian Law of Merchant Shipping, or the PolluterPays How Much?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Liability; Legal liability; Delict; Business; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Comparative law; Commercial law; Private law; Black letter law","score_opus":0.026903066090188353,"score_gpt":0.2278815343358825,"score_spread":0.20097846824569415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012025403","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06776972,0.0118665695,0.005199479,0.16120847,0.0010745676,0.000106782965,0.00041512743,0.00006126956,0.75229806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83034456,0.007254628,0.0013911747,0.026748786,0.0015332372,0.00006778308,0.00011202869,0.00004236396,0.1325055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99075514,0.0011241317,0.00026219754,0.00073831656,0.0037111668,0.0034089875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930211,0.0018107034,0.00058391195,0.0006023525,0.0031683466,0.0008135602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006073914,0.00073266536,0.0007348715,0.0022952394,0.009339614,0.010814383,0.0039119534,0.012362865,0.0074148453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015957685,0.00086204783,0.0007785491,0.0021289699,0.02171752,0.006272119,0.002844524,0.007452667,0.00065900764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025058793,0.000041468164,0.0015775366,0.00003576917,0.000021235748,0.00013074739,0.0013227669,0.0010855322,0.00020557706,0.9542852,0.032616038,0.008653038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006558182,0.00006509865,0.024207477,0.00066655606,0.0001578629,0.00028572226,0.0058494178,0.005727203,0.0008905303,0.6067515,0.3550536,0.00027942122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9032794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.962163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09672058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.067943394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07750633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49296612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012036314","doi":"","title":"Tax Discrimination in the NAFTA Bloc: The Impact of Tax and TradeAgreements on the Cross-Border Trade in Services","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International economics; International trade; Economics; Tax law; Business; Double taxation; Public economics","score_opus":0.017082089050273953,"score_gpt":0.3243138505622765,"score_spread":0.30723176151200254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012036314","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8557479,0.0023984627,0.000104808605,0.03131212,0.00017503863,0.000031657866,0.0004981384,0.00000998493,0.109721884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98586476,0.00097345613,0.00004187787,0.0027517793,0.00008349046,0.000010699412,0.00014666299,0.0000060422803,0.010121309],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974734,0.0004313181,0.000059106955,0.0001556915,0.0005532164,0.0013272453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970831,0.00094798557,0.00072957884,0.00009692672,0.0005685004,0.0005738336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021623117,0.00021670992,0.00051989994,0.0018998004,0.006514153,0.007586757,0.00091523223,0.0041451827,0.012445082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006978673,0.0001979355,0.0007126986,0.003075959,0.0034482647,0.0030302282,0.003339515,0.003621892,0.0006930286],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017659025,0.001738872,0.4122931,0.00020682647,0.00033548402,0.0030336461,0.015900934,0.003280967,0.001367202,0.41040665,0.07331441,0.076355934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035005214,0.00061644823,0.7498642,0.00085383304,0.0008041991,0.0006097524,0.06565053,0.0039772643,0.0018466474,0.045253355,0.13000979,0.00016382162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48695204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.66632915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51304793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011715867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011474718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9682353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012056615","doi":"","title":"A Comment on the Complementary Jurisdictionof the International Criminal Court: Adding Insult toInjury in Transitional Contexts?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insult; Criminal law; Law; Political science; Criminal court; International law; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.033026520056164986,"score_gpt":0.3080217081237147,"score_spread":0.27499518806754975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012056615","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016972866,0.0008951577,0.00023822952,0.982311,0.008747283,0.000015182013,0.00009438542,0.000019937375,0.0059815925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013606113,0.0006571735,0.00020403079,0.9690544,0.009446191,0.000061018185,0.000029549128,0.00004452179,0.006896979],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98838484,0.0019274101,0.0012227738,0.002689396,0.0019790225,0.0037966352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9648067,0.02688498,0.0014625544,0.001123979,0.0030806556,0.002641249],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015138199,0.0015205562,0.0026029649,0.0011628025,0.028494762,0.010186414,0.011035255,0.1646785,0.014046448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045075715,0.0021553114,0.0033967206,0.0024742868,0.021255244,0.018087225,0.010220639,0.11434853,0.0038410858],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012269581,0.00003492997,0.0008972103,0.00016002016,0.000040167248,0.0012874497,0.009245725,0.00011879708,0.00028605846,0.10364119,0.88045233,0.0037135119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022843947,0.00010002039,0.006012644,0.0017072734,0.00021634778,0.001142394,0.028597772,0.0005149299,0.0013316264,0.07434,0.8854053,0.00040323407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.089029446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19113646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1646785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008632029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016972704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17702246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012080886","doi":"","title":"Cooperative Environmental Assessments:Their Increasing Role in Oil and Gas Projects","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fossil fuel; Environmental law; Environmental planning; Business; Environmental science; Natural resource economics; Petroleum engineering; Environmental protection; Political science; Economics; Engineering; Law; Waste management","score_opus":0.012464701645400759,"score_gpt":0.26039234058547894,"score_spread":0.2479276389400782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012080886","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28998792,0.005866121,0.053120807,0.100727014,0.0008119609,0.00049191405,0.00047084922,0.0010549002,0.54746854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9615367,0.0019407657,0.009503493,0.004503736,0.00031002003,0.0003334335,0.00013818173,0.00008704854,0.021646503],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97368413,0.013195464,0.00062465266,0.0017537237,0.00930877,0.0014332115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8000665,0.14597239,0.010936012,0.007449189,0.023260977,0.012314976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.057438046,0.00046359657,0.00037742683,0.0052695135,0.0076520885,0.0075582853,0.0022925898,0.0063416255,0.013844326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10325275,0.0006760751,0.00043445965,0.0036979178,0.007911172,0.009144283,0.010770277,0.0052869385,0.00088308833],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029596986,0.0006728734,0.059549004,0.0004947302,0.000102657854,0.001038891,0.013526022,0.007822171,0.0020053433,0.31964102,0.11602168,0.4788297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027016795,0.0006691205,0.11885075,0.0009312758,0.0001075428,0.0010787047,0.029074062,0.02481138,0.0025514755,0.16321997,0.65819967,0.00023592846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023086268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057527162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057438046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005620143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021664781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30376506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012085502","doi":"","title":"The Law of Options","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02771607847675601,"score_gpt":0.2841747365592504,"score_spread":0.2564586580824944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012085502","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009461827,0.0059626754,0.007908676,0.07565456,0.0005655858,0.000044213455,0.0002414508,0.000039247643,0.90012175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72139883,0.0037783128,0.004074449,0.03738293,0.0023814854,0.00042472692,0.00013362356,0.00009895894,0.23032662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99706787,0.0009630647,0.00011835233,0.00061531976,0.000798708,0.00043669235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975303,0.0014415766,0.00015597724,0.00038396622,0.00032049074,0.0001676591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041000517,0.0005105255,0.0008350859,0.0008991769,0.0061232597,0.009963884,0.0012890766,0.0107839815,0.014329156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010410903,0.0007359213,0.0007235411,0.00093683874,0.019948985,0.007536552,0.0029747144,0.012465334,0.0014278772],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025232048,0.0000030920257,0.000035236706,0.0000024147619,0.0000013527113,0.0000082790075,0.00007520332,0.000027685343,0.0000085562915,0.99632806,0.003008819,0.00049876794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013981962,0.0000041554813,0.000117511045,0.000031328433,0.000005278542,0.000020762394,0.00009435013,0.0002530043,0.000034624012,0.9492217,0.050196413,0.0000068761638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026557712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022061117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026557712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006689656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051569487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05280626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012108012","doi":"","title":"The Best Things in Law are Free?:Towards Quality Free Public Accessto Primary Legal Materials in Canada","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Quality (philosophy); Legal history; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04655171573101667,"score_gpt":0.338016501545715,"score_spread":0.2914647858146983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012108012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6052837,0.004564317,0.006784119,0.15201817,0.0005188628,0.0013620158,0.002328974,0.00050051085,0.22663933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87638533,0.0020511474,0.006998175,0.01309183,0.00007865476,0.00022033433,0.0005484176,0.0001550361,0.10047101],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98427606,0.0010755669,0.00039955392,0.0008396975,0.007827487,0.005581578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9705156,0.0033690277,0.0010869687,0.00096574076,0.013400491,0.010662148],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007117529,0.0002953494,0.00051986723,0.0033417076,0.023252288,0.01305283,0.004169894,0.005109702,0.024462964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025758442,0.0010038773,0.00077472074,0.004234375,0.006280744,0.00473549,0.00792893,0.0051128175,0.0011768944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029688925,0.0015274206,0.1130722,0.0011316228,0.00007887688,0.0021684216,0.05906938,0.0040380284,0.0031080793,0.22359495,0.24058333,0.35133076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023146498,0.0003129325,0.32634646,0.0012836888,0.00014852466,0.00079948915,0.06279495,0.008834866,0.004023139,0.021021916,0.5737442,0.0004584152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.996788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99890363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9958301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15942462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.45553195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9749483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012192475","doi":"","title":"An Empty Shell of a Treaty Promise:R. v. Marshall and the Rights of theNon-Status Indians","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Law; Political science; International law; Shell (structure); Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.0063400605361066545,"score_gpt":0.22924597838885433,"score_spread":0.22290591785274766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012192475","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058216084,0.003056975,0.0014164896,0.1203535,0.0005782941,0.00003956291,0.00012436497,0.000052745134,0.81616193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8267242,0.0010800952,0.00058256206,0.017950406,0.00044050693,0.000054678356,0.000026869917,0.000067941,0.15307274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978921,0.00065041846,0.000050173996,0.00021879934,0.00036313286,0.00082528504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998594,0.00065845746,0.000105177816,0.00022085557,0.00020991685,0.00021161391],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036188525,0.00030836219,0.0006202828,0.0006656893,0.016528549,0.011075795,0.0015630397,0.008120383,0.008948707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007175224,0.0004992523,0.00043499048,0.00063281745,0.0192878,0.0070285047,0.005950604,0.010362424,0.00087482395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018849665,0.000006094419,0.00010184203,0.000007916061,0.0000024560964,0.00010757073,0.0034250196,0.000053421772,0.00009890686,0.98276067,0.011968615,0.0014486548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004564934,0.00003157451,0.0010895472,0.0002681233,0.000039776292,0.0001939652,0.015284285,0.0004363905,0.0006371907,0.59267527,0.38917643,0.00012192456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13850242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22258818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8614976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010085863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011083376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27539247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012254562","doi":"","title":"Same-Sex Partners And Family Class Immigration: Still Not EqualWith Opposite-Sex Partners","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Class (philosophy); Political science; Demographic economics; Psychology; Gender studies; Sociology; Law; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.06380435913512152,"score_gpt":0.35932297326192475,"score_spread":0.29551861412680325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012254562","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5068546,0.007032305,0.00094395434,0.19747944,0.0017223982,0.000046247525,0.000235508,0.000009945041,0.28567564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96638805,0.0015630615,0.00013955936,0.015720012,0.00032014961,0.000024688981,0.000028183444,0.000005613391,0.015810655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961365,0.0009612342,0.00009965914,0.00044339948,0.00044611216,0.0019131051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965417,0.001223111,0.00031577435,0.00022190904,0.00031435973,0.0013832119],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047102943,0.00021480191,0.0006976707,0.0007380722,0.0118101705,0.0062917206,0.0012921508,0.006096952,0.018138766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008669845,0.00035361148,0.00039553407,0.00093394844,0.013257342,0.006143339,0.006399402,0.0069443444,0.00044031884],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026710247,0.00033593306,0.075154215,0.000096551004,0.00006949269,0.001773801,0.035583686,0.00013199273,0.00023559305,0.7909418,0.038009126,0.05740066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022804821,0.00027825244,0.1446559,0.0013763084,0.0002978449,0.0029943641,0.2678324,0.0006441815,0.00071938423,0.365326,0.21544713,0.00020025788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11464266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28623945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8853573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042920127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056101293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22795069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012301177","doi":"","title":"International Royalty and Continental Shelf Limits: Emerging Issues for theCanadian Offshore","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Submarine pipeline; Continental shelf; International law; Business; Oceanography; Geology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.009578929449218981,"score_gpt":0.25300412625238916,"score_spread":0.24342519680317018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012301177","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.106106825,0.022686204,0.0015762739,0.22782397,0.0013214295,0.000015094279,0.00027115253,0.000046731606,0.64015234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78495276,0.014806253,0.0013543242,0.06001699,0.0010936912,0.00003997623,0.00021133939,0.000096590236,0.13742803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997059,0.00033484207,0.00013708681,0.0004617783,0.0009849172,0.0010224624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99205506,0.0028606132,0.0005322184,0.00044958974,0.002811613,0.0012910584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046441886,0.00034995767,0.00086703576,0.0014629575,0.013686452,0.022328133,0.0034718139,0.01265552,0.021382075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013033683,0.00044458883,0.0007827355,0.0030532265,0.016195713,0.009517364,0.0088902125,0.009108815,0.0009837267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004317131,0.000036640133,0.0044686375,0.00012375897,0.000018400953,0.0006278619,0.008741215,0.00048396006,0.00018986412,0.89669055,0.059302032,0.029273931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000279838,0.000038970782,0.01493495,0.0009555066,0.000059550763,0.0004731332,0.05169848,0.0005601139,0.00035635784,0.19112436,0.73961884,0.00015171374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.511407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70239216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48859298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023508226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031827454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9829408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012328936","doi":"","title":"Offshore Seismic and Fisheries and Environmental Issues - How Can They beReconciled?: A Case Study on the Public Review on the Effects of Potential Oil and GasExploration Offshore Cape Breton","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Submarine pipeline; Fishery; Cape; Oceanography; Environmental science; Geology; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02373222435029317,"score_gpt":0.2604183396831194,"score_spread":0.2366861153328262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012328936","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48227692,0.04963826,0.0009226316,0.30526674,0.0011612999,0.00014536732,0.0002361538,0.000021098891,0.1603315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9268627,0.02991829,0.00039739267,0.020697542,0.0005152326,0.00006130886,0.00007000383,0.000013483345,0.021463973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958851,0.0015309941,0.00020133799,0.00018096008,0.0012894414,0.0009121761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98081815,0.013911893,0.00210248,0.00030219444,0.0024736605,0.0003916052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007169876,0.00034213962,0.00040211497,0.0021124852,0.0045566587,0.005537963,0.0010068906,0.007692898,0.0031764552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02268898,0.00028146352,0.00041063107,0.0029005588,0.0048323832,0.0031067228,0.0028541514,0.0029745463,0.000118862976],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048719323,0.00032868612,0.055663526,0.0043722894,0.00024319967,0.02988229,0.075407416,0.0059828744,0.0052015944,0.43736663,0.18893349,0.19613083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001377756,0.0002577372,0.094299816,0.003526662,0.00032193869,0.0020237183,0.16840066,0.0011660865,0.00284261,0.019784125,0.7070741,0.00016474191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16861662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33659554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83138335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01133948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0168165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33527035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012354532","doi":"","title":"A Brief Overview of the Enforceability of ForumSelection, Choice of Law, and Arbitration Clausesand the Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniensunder the Admiralty Law of the United States","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Doctrine; Political science; Arbitration; Choice of law; Conflict of laws","score_opus":0.02923647036956558,"score_gpt":0.26739498107832077,"score_spread":0.23815851070875518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012354532","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009492386,0.34173536,0.06799055,0.025394324,0.0028219798,0.00042519753,0.00063074904,0.0001785957,0.55133075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17386082,0.50422907,0.08186682,0.020392064,0.01316276,0.00092889153,0.0014143629,0.00021392129,0.20393129],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99647033,0.0010383923,0.00030624817,0.00032645278,0.0012319024,0.00062669214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99756074,0.0017878198,0.00019252226,0.00015612174,0.0002246565,0.00007819391],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042367643,0.00111214,0.0009066992,0.004170908,0.004192452,0.007568683,0.0018172701,0.008151655,0.013889004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044898232,0.0012965057,0.0015140625,0.005187003,0.005782752,0.00910548,0.002217264,0.006816255,0.0026970035],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012550456,0.0000795608,0.00030311596,0.00022187395,0.000007421842,0.00010840305,0.000420313,0.00048359882,0.00035940207,0.9538206,0.014627402,0.02955583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010182741,0.00008191732,0.002427563,0.0008060875,0.000020302854,0.00039226472,0.00045590097,0.0011696853,0.0006169816,0.3691601,0.62481767,0.000041406725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015072132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024996936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015072132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005023466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036749805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04646337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012443271","doi":"","title":"Marshalling Principles fromThe Marshall Morass","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Marshalling; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.03938617419903775,"score_gpt":0.21970783468711577,"score_spread":0.18032166048807802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012443271","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029935617,0.007558935,0.34328747,0.026737629,0.0012032745,0.00010905522,0.0003883999,0.0004187231,0.5903609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68434834,0.0060569677,0.076958425,0.0028227642,0.0021023788,0.00027543906,0.00024274204,0.0004962345,0.22669661],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989016,0.0002751537,0.000059651793,0.00016694218,0.0004515592,0.00014511327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989243,0.00032691422,0.000085969696,0.00040004854,0.00018873165,0.00007396047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022692485,0.0008298184,0.000735158,0.001547623,0.0030494146,0.00325315,0.0010785101,0.0024463604,0.01823134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00401095,0.0005449984,0.0009171666,0.0009536631,0.0073442757,0.0080708815,0.0045900233,0.0042452198,0.0020275242],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013526791,0.0000018179942,0.00001416588,0.0000029530352,0.0000012621481,0.0000056823183,0.000056935718,0.000112024325,0.00001788472,0.9970866,0.001044398,0.0016549554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017862111,0.0000016913507,0.000030647603,0.0000062225977,0.0000013249775,0.000011634959,0.00001635164,0.00030380333,0.000050158946,0.98437136,0.0152014205,0.0000036233528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047212294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00473743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01823134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033422683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022084792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060989857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012459786","doi":"","title":"Breach of Contract?: The New Economy, Access to Justice and theEthical Responsibilities of the Legal Profession","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Economic Justice; Law; Business; Breach of contract; Professional responsibility; Legal service; Political science; Damages","score_opus":0.06586348626266146,"score_gpt":0.38859037400642776,"score_spread":0.3227268877437663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012459786","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08601512,0.010979162,0.004509771,0.573389,0.00069595367,0.000026268835,0.00006658649,0.000021079137,0.32429716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96305037,0.0026404657,0.0008518679,0.018106515,0.00067680737,0.000054972566,0.000012116661,0.00002646805,0.0145804575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99155045,0.00445064,0.00021385522,0.0007240672,0.001251937,0.0018089695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98432964,0.010084019,0.0013553356,0.0008263919,0.0009990274,0.0024056053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015690219,0.00027679236,0.00073339255,0.0015141821,0.011529144,0.025576094,0.001796067,0.017063726,0.014683083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02446693,0.0005286013,0.0004286777,0.0019907467,0.08039072,0.031944793,0.0075482703,0.01219327,0.0008927908],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015305277,0.000026260279,0.00040725194,0.00001172219,0.00000273672,0.00006559065,0.004869435,0.000055097396,0.000023882361,0.98832315,0.0030460786,0.0031534627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019332028,0.000009431225,0.0012105476,0.00012410461,0.000005594428,0.00011102483,0.011527489,0.00030414492,0.000056226607,0.9533872,0.03322084,0.000024131987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03369302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042781845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03369302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014282336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023881637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10362613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012536637","doi":"","title":"Canadian Law Teachers in the 1930s: \"When the World was TurnedUpside Down\"","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Legal education","score_opus":0.030949882436189496,"score_gpt":0.332850534060498,"score_spread":0.3019006516243085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012536637","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23726892,0.007122072,0.00044281728,0.5006586,0.0034007896,0.00011065893,0.0025516371,0.00011357196,0.24833101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73900306,0.0039377157,0.00031046983,0.054223515,0.0003847924,0.00005106227,0.00053379283,0.00010211456,0.20145349],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956061,0.00025148923,0.0000500901,0.00026014706,0.0011314098,0.0027006553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99491346,0.00035136528,0.00021390365,0.000056096927,0.0020188058,0.0024462545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028853142,0.00037213642,0.00035008046,0.0021016963,0.038785398,0.008888444,0.0016325893,0.006864133,0.020086171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008821051,0.00056436507,0.00041783784,0.004056204,0.008758738,0.0036742087,0.0035843756,0.010316437,0.0011229861],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015429217,0.000103472616,0.027929699,0.00016658111,0.000027072907,0.0012580649,0.2060929,0.00026925383,0.00053859595,0.10857592,0.6063672,0.048517138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000176325,0.000016877164,0.06457126,0.00022391781,0.00002338026,0.00008539756,0.12984248,0.00006935996,0.0002724143,0.0019874966,0.80280846,0.00008140078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.998033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78614837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21385165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26403314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91182065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013196746","doi":"","title":"The Animal Protection Commission: Advancing Social Membershipfor Animals through a Novel Administrative Agency","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Agency (philosophy); Administrative law; Public administration; Political science; Business; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.10603367940154422,"score_gpt":0.33789022780219635,"score_spread":0.23185654840065212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013196746","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056540374,0.0015604806,0.009032158,0.51750326,0.0019670136,0.000206173,0.0001401513,0.00017935141,0.41287106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67226,0.0012230322,0.009339503,0.08206719,0.0008613896,0.00046332038,0.00008723483,0.00020578154,0.2334925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9765909,0.0073487726,0.00058374845,0.0018730076,0.0067251893,0.006878402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97167295,0.014389888,0.0013208858,0.002529485,0.004515532,0.005571324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025979962,0.00045560178,0.0004965258,0.001853638,0.034734137,0.032759547,0.0033853853,0.030723408,0.024675967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046215434,0.0010416197,0.0006561242,0.0022582964,0.030712496,0.018813754,0.01388892,0.017402112,0.0016754168],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026441252,0.000101685095,0.002331972,0.000024586236,0.0000060318253,0.00014553414,0.00748791,0.00014695195,0.00013983995,0.87007743,0.106256925,0.013254764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008197723,0.00009558469,0.010930221,0.00032167442,0.00007187674,0.0001425194,0.033115294,0.0014181881,0.00097018614,0.12379774,0.82889485,0.00015989938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3151526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5224473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3151526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032345943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09760829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6266364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013925780","doi":"","title":"Duets, Not Solos: The McLachlin Court’s Co-Authorship Legacy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0811891587362291,"score_gpt":0.4052365622287247,"score_spread":0.32404740349249556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013925780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050360378,0.004884228,0.010399112,0.4343901,0.003110438,0.000034092915,0.0001069524,0.00009768217,0.4966171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8821374,0.0012402833,0.0016389445,0.03749448,0.0031243716,0.000067392684,0.000031292784,0.00021071394,0.07405511],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9847017,0.00545084,0.0007204295,0.0035912674,0.0036618267,0.0018738908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8941039,0.08032401,0.0030538826,0.009415865,0.008126305,0.0049760193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02319938,0.0003535869,0.0009555129,0.00241827,0.024713282,0.019089233,0.002459923,0.016819576,0.016336296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.091291554,0.0006460161,0.00050120725,0.002622012,0.04088375,0.016807815,0.008256778,0.024399865,0.0014652475],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000108572685,0.0000075390653,0.00035584014,0.00000933915,0.0000061810715,0.00014033215,0.004219535,0.000047735637,0.000024607118,0.96236193,0.025534587,0.0072815027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003757166,0.000009175406,0.00054344273,0.00019091037,0.000013048009,0.0003002564,0.0037894733,0.00059007417,0.00027416972,0.8390415,0.15516901,0.000041346604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02182853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041506045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9919714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00802864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009659423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12269151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013950883","doi":"","title":"A Reply to Professor Pothier's Review of Power Without Law: TheSupreme Court of Canada, the Marshall Decisions and theFailure of Judicial Activism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Judicial activism; Power (physics); Judicial review; Judicial opinion","score_opus":0.01866275446483642,"score_gpt":0.2886034032387778,"score_spread":0.2699406487739414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013950883","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010655913,0.0024376337,0.00003758937,0.9844974,0.012464055,0.0000029554933,0.000019061812,0.0000041856792,0.0004304093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019152921,0.0013875216,0.000075619144,0.9744014,0.020058382,0.000011163145,0.000009420612,0.000024456514,0.0021167712],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9826287,0.004389004,0.0020016383,0.002825934,0.0053785504,0.0027760991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.903684,0.07092995,0.0039616046,0.00205621,0.014569065,0.0047991886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018943163,0.0013643391,0.0023301078,0.0028711173,0.015131929,0.014640379,0.0078044115,0.109036125,0.007949147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09512431,0.0015617062,0.0021096244,0.004071506,0.021625329,0.01380884,0.007950625,0.09536234,0.0026710555],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011748744,0.0000062368613,0.000077602665,0.00006806837,0.000012202044,0.00011858017,0.000744052,0.00002029612,0.00003778364,0.009784657,0.9873883,0.001730617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004396984,0.000014352932,0.0007502258,0.0006412307,0.000037620415,0.00019938241,0.004125754,0.00008478522,0.00019533181,0.0127162915,0.981108,0.00008296275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.100776196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22241326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8992238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016621679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029698271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20037925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014058336","doi":"","title":"The Constitutionality of Classification: IndigenousOverrepresentation and Security Policy in CanadianFederal Penitentiaries","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Law; Political science; Supreme court","score_opus":0.0364788672087247,"score_gpt":0.3479918036845599,"score_spread":0.3115129364758352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014058336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6597184,0.0015834325,0.0015333521,0.044945188,0.00015842488,0.00013974363,0.00032057246,0.00003433142,0.29156667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9766798,0.00031149303,0.00046208812,0.0025623536,0.000022334883,0.000033494944,0.000041651674,0.000013408824,0.01987334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98085934,0.002461215,0.0003746298,0.0011215183,0.0030059635,0.012177386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98676246,0.0048790006,0.0008449023,0.0008058194,0.0044752187,0.0022326354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0116731385,0.0003599641,0.00063887227,0.0027691494,0.04158301,0.015450231,0.0042666416,0.0059650764,0.009178149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020817045,0.00076646765,0.00058321876,0.0040232292,0.02408455,0.0038113787,0.006210235,0.0072627575,0.0002741398],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007277794,0.00007772636,0.01917267,0.00006302227,0.000026753856,0.00031279007,0.042558137,0.0006121788,0.0006713221,0.90993017,0.010019091,0.016483257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014080576,0.0002116922,0.20217453,0.0014023675,0.00034268407,0.00042974693,0.2434116,0.0055492194,0.003196911,0.17714207,0.36543703,0.0005612271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98941565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9955473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15177964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15177964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24888754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9838154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3030605442","doi":"","title":"Child Pornography in Canada and the United States:The Myth of Right Answers","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Pornography; Political science; Law; Child pornography; History; The Internet; Computer science","score_opus":0.008716514021694842,"score_gpt":0.24623540295955768,"score_spread":0.23751888893786283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3030605442","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032010376,0.0066150133,0.00041025493,0.8931602,0.0010254511,0.000011829013,0.0003861899,0.00001768208,0.06636295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7785371,0.009721304,0.000645383,0.18830097,0.001636794,0.00004430689,0.0002734482,0.00008462148,0.020756071],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953513,0.0007536574,0.00017840174,0.00038376695,0.0009777143,0.0023550368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885698,0.0033004198,0.00092138356,0.0003841025,0.0034004517,0.0034239104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056096027,0.00028374454,0.0007345228,0.0017036994,0.013969281,0.007316451,0.0022866095,0.011023636,0.01248369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022112258,0.00038688094,0.000490004,0.0016028677,0.025658898,0.008584933,0.0064137867,0.016796298,0.0004851433],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013332978,0.00014363142,0.038795117,0.00013640625,0.00006272255,0.0011932943,0.03267998,0.00043879027,0.00018451542,0.6104924,0.24962233,0.06611744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000965438,0.000036315272,0.04848961,0.0018932009,0.000084598345,0.0007231538,0.17718776,0.0005924225,0.00035916065,0.21075003,0.5596113,0.00017592004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9182096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9512166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08179039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027403217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07135248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19882524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095548731","doi":"","title":"Sharing the Spotlight: Co-authored Reasons on theModern Supreme Court of Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; International law","score_opus":0.05341429243685371,"score_gpt":0.28208366399481694,"score_spread":0.22866937155796324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3095548731","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33279935,0.0041762185,0.002342558,0.13949281,0.0015556286,0.0001299073,0.0005909869,0.00012662938,0.51878583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89813393,0.00066402287,0.00045790448,0.013453583,0.00018642323,0.000032008495,0.000071947994,0.00009994021,0.086900234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98651415,0.0013897318,0.0002313631,0.0011754576,0.004486922,0.0062023243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985993,0.0052430723,0.0003857683,0.00069571857,0.0054149944,0.002267405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00581684,0.0005581856,0.00097631133,0.0022659774,0.05703202,0.01976791,0.0037378909,0.018430088,0.017858135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025274444,0.0006712292,0.00079973065,0.0034421778,0.011282909,0.004625062,0.0072348733,0.014020795,0.00079812657],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023540822,0.00012225169,0.014835034,0.000087259265,0.00010233486,0.002807395,0.07794527,0.0007763417,0.00078702945,0.64461464,0.2235458,0.03414122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011434195,0.000054437267,0.023249697,0.00047246754,0.00030681427,0.0005737525,0.12569194,0.0025586504,0.0026781,0.07832355,0.76551145,0.00046480627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9920449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08697285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08697285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13179445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6310351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095817822","doi":"","title":"The Justiciability of Climate Change: AComparison ofUS and Canadian Approaches","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Climate change; Political science; Law; Politics; Ecology","score_opus":0.10632420175792745,"score_gpt":0.2872782956223335,"score_spread":0.18095409386440603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3095817822","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02295175,0.008840276,0.008639137,0.1003974,0.0003896715,0.000038946622,0.00020997557,0.00006163628,0.8584711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9457536,0.0075466787,0.0027971487,0.0082120495,0.00029034514,0.000056672165,0.00007337589,0.00006785695,0.035202254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98503464,0.0031536843,0.00040582116,0.0012346708,0.0062308456,0.003940429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98656356,0.005159786,0.00048154336,0.0010122892,0.0051671695,0.0016156478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069670677,0.00072804594,0.0009670615,0.006977404,0.023165956,0.016920656,0.0036081828,0.00544001,0.011194852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018018268,0.0005114175,0.0010242,0.00958927,0.042672183,0.009731544,0.0067509054,0.0077020875,0.00030476466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056226554,0.0000034555737,0.00032516586,0.000026804037,0.0000048537627,0.00001926271,0.0020491912,0.00013218018,0.000019928417,0.9913908,0.0025897995,0.0034329672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022467848,0.000011907495,0.006949464,0.0003926625,0.000075902644,0.00009952021,0.01106245,0.0018182859,0.00022967528,0.7810644,0.19819194,0.00008133285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9684614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9824478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.122876145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.122876145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12890226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.891533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3096069643","doi":"","title":"Offshore Oil and Gas Facility Decommissioningin Nova Scotia and Newfoundland","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Marine and Offshore Engineering Studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Submarine pipeline; Fossil fuel; Environmental science; Geology; Oceanography; Petroleum engineering; Fishery; Engineering; Waste management","score_opus":0.010851699323385656,"score_gpt":0.2212485611980949,"score_spread":0.21039686187470927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3096069643","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91943735,0.00067277503,0.00021333747,0.0035182512,0.0000748099,0.000090414556,0.0009960608,0.00002107739,0.07497579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.943996,0.00055642216,0.00016853648,0.0007997821,0.000011196664,0.000022014457,0.0004896458,0.000008852857,0.053947542],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982071,0.00008127393,0.000052841893,0.00009810736,0.00038823907,0.0011724577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950062,0.00055047823,0.001287132,0.00017473193,0.0017059275,0.0012755294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008362366,0.00022631155,0.00024597498,0.0010241136,0.0051102806,0.0026589623,0.0009486783,0.0010959312,0.0061445152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038986169,0.00029974806,0.00032723937,0.0014370175,0.0015808797,0.0010320187,0.001847702,0.0011434697,0.00032348768],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00081151415,0.0001653779,0.8456189,0.0002539755,0.0000975886,0.006083194,0.011219731,0.006627622,0.0032106217,0.020977344,0.04950593,0.055428125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025378717,0.000075281685,0.94414866,0.00013419554,0.000031098272,0.00029035236,0.021318678,0.0010007918,0.0008201285,0.00035388084,0.031772494,0.000029159399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9736264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9944121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9525966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047403388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0394747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34393728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107164542","doi":"","title":"Anatomy of a Liquefied Natural Gas Receiving Terminal inAtlantic Canada-an Overview of the Legal and RegulatoryHurdles","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Marine and Offshore Engineering Studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terminal (telecommunication); Medicine; Anatomy; Engineering","score_opus":0.009229525187571613,"score_gpt":0.24026904033106733,"score_spread":0.23103951514349572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107164542","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043811545,0.003324471,0.021852402,0.0205748,0.00026748574,0.00013714822,0.00049136824,0.0001940981,0.9093467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4746597,0.0061710984,0.021032702,0.0027301253,0.00008672895,0.00007663115,0.00021552462,0.00014394907,0.49488363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936706,0.000055114167,0.000009842404,0.00006237284,0.00020574746,0.00029986852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970144,0.000038861173,0.000020733352,0.000016968934,0.00011419135,0.000107844906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040196546,0.00032688983,0.00015177506,0.0010460927,0.008748919,0.008187549,0.0014948873,0.0033074722,0.020526705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006671832,0.0003498751,0.00031071686,0.0014517212,0.008087194,0.0020923743,0.0022386273,0.0027163648,0.0018176265],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000114704435,0.00001188178,0.0015735294,0.000028233291,0.0000017549912,0.0017295285,0.0031922753,0.0010494123,0.0008618851,0.9574348,0.014399701,0.01970552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008702062,0.000028296743,0.010851893,0.00044214996,0.000014346687,0.0029155167,0.019796416,0.0033816455,0.0012480533,0.09166116,0.8695904,0.00006147634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8517382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9380114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14826179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032437053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059040405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2982698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110983583","doi":"","title":"Damages for Mental Distress and Other Intangible Loss in aCommercial Context","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Leadership, Behavior, and Decision-Making Studies","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Context (archaeology); Mental distress; Distress; Law and economics; Psychology; Law; Business; Mental health; Political science; Psychiatry; Sociology; Psychotherapist; History","score_opus":0.11150989828357442,"score_gpt":0.40240511445143157,"score_spread":0.29089521616785713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110983583","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8185262,0.002071675,0.0011941538,0.029413285,0.00026602164,0.000066774555,0.00032341763,0.000020547726,0.14811793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938811,0.00027098722,0.00013670178,0.00074985484,0.000060510534,0.000007575016,0.000027609238,0.0000014782662,0.004864067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856335,0.00040719795,0.000068457724,0.00010195018,0.0002264907,0.00063253095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99649316,0.000902148,0.00084062264,0.0003348123,0.0004786278,0.00095072424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013094777,0.00020685652,0.00026606282,0.0009898909,0.0032726324,0.0022137675,0.000627015,0.0028041855,0.010888684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007939714,0.00017266686,0.00033787006,0.00052724517,0.0029176928,0.001725212,0.0027084283,0.0025326214,0.00031230898],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007786199,0.0017827827,0.38334662,0.00013925978,0.00019635622,0.006707417,0.0042246305,0.0042112675,0.001158018,0.45154423,0.038636886,0.107273884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010385825,0.0008671383,0.67971504,0.0003342203,0.0002266998,0.005831691,0.02032771,0.005609914,0.0012268607,0.22841403,0.05716565,0.00017714039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021843325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.091044486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9781567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031702225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002976838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043432355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3113476506","doi":"","title":"\"We Shall Not Cease From Exploration\": Narratives fromthe Hyde Inquiry about Mental Health and Criminal Justice","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Mental health; Criminal justice; Criminology; Psychology; Economic Justice; Criminal law; Sociology; Political science; Law; Psychotherapist; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06584618676533893,"score_gpt":0.3550053466275127,"score_spread":0.2891591598621738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3113476506","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15403831,0.008953404,0.0019311972,0.7343787,0.002595317,0.00009143638,0.00007334301,0.000029685332,0.09790861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.889997,0.0028093765,0.0005226573,0.08138224,0.0005465766,0.00012073278,0.00002112775,0.00007298641,0.02452739],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9825682,0.012647577,0.00029182996,0.00062093936,0.000921375,0.0029501903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9825891,0.01240089,0.0009970726,0.0004702118,0.00081540743,0.0027273726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014408376,0.001185154,0.0010709434,0.0015132265,0.072645895,0.019159522,0.0029389944,0.022408323,0.0039554564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022335056,0.001087228,0.0005258482,0.0014939309,0.12453815,0.023452599,0.024496112,0.046741527,0.00036755277],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014832392,0.000018664372,0.0002142757,0.000027427368,0.00000276319,0.00069321494,0.8557721,0.000019446356,0.000078797035,0.13315053,0.0089547215,0.0010533093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010031832,0.000010035584,0.00026165007,0.00019575616,0.0000040614377,0.00036709968,0.8737085,0.000034935187,0.00014119055,0.017973784,0.10726794,0.000024990919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055125013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10370255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.072645895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017066358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025285285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12382567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114913787","doi":"","title":"Alex M. Cameron, Power Without Law. The Supreme Courtof Canada, .the Marshall Decisions, and the Failure ofJudicial Activism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.012217173374166387,"score_gpt":0.252947511472747,"score_spread":0.24073033809858063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3114913787","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012576167,0.18021113,0.0013601787,0.6537638,0.0023615374,0.000058413953,0.0007108584,0.0000407324,0.1489172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5987013,0.109166026,0.002567738,0.13526616,0.0030046878,0.0001379395,0.00026461648,0.00012684782,0.15076473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978543,0.00054017716,0.00008034087,0.0002214571,0.00079694716,0.00050671684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942364,0.003780514,0.00030063273,0.0001393954,0.0011727212,0.00037023044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039382833,0.0004908426,0.0004148649,0.0014394288,0.017280828,0.00691737,0.002164297,0.011286631,0.0135183055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0106282355,0.00059508736,0.00029348585,0.0026569623,0.013268611,0.005876724,0.0016765543,0.009165607,0.00110679],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051375227,0.00003558699,0.0018269152,0.00012776756,0.000015373242,0.00022273157,0.0051833363,0.00023385117,0.0001720199,0.5675733,0.41190088,0.012656827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073542076,0.000020743139,0.015333107,0.00105806,0.000042428783,0.00015109497,0.0122609995,0.00044000964,0.00066138024,0.2379321,0.7318932,0.00013336232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80345756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.938346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19654244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022486718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020892534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3953998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3119009318","doi":"","title":"Physicians' Attitudes, Concerns, and Procedural Understandingof Medical Aid-in-Dying in Vermont","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medical law; Medicine; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0935724053911631,"score_gpt":0.4043741061348529,"score_spread":0.31080170074368985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3119009318","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9714047,0.00040789292,0.00013882424,0.019149445,0.000038646802,0.000014945352,0.000027446586,0.0000036391746,0.008814437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933294,0.00020612098,0.00010072413,0.0046424353,0.000013250845,0.000012078432,0.000014532623,0.00000323397,0.0016782577],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889254,0.0057668095,0.0005175264,0.00049881736,0.0017951741,0.0024962346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9696704,0.016271064,0.005767548,0.00044341022,0.00356096,0.0042866296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00981986,0.00011731189,0.00026527533,0.0009987121,0.014915105,0.005850693,0.0010561887,0.0027573183,0.003979602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03743708,0.00041032734,0.0002960505,0.0009732192,0.005982434,0.0031477967,0.0054342397,0.005557396,0.00020012334],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001255693,0.00027132517,0.22133727,0.00006735338,0.000038279606,0.0016439301,0.74138284,0.00025349882,0.00092285534,0.010741988,0.0069181817,0.016296929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031466643,0.00015788725,0.24170634,0.00053923257,0.00004345955,0.001043071,0.70086247,0.0006727999,0.00081358413,0.0035631394,0.050470367,0.00009613129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3948632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6500646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3948632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020202702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024410151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78512967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120103928","doi":"","title":"Greg Taylor, The Law of the Land: The Advent of the Torrens Systemin Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.010720941328888657,"score_gpt":0.17195426951076315,"score_spread":0.1612333281818745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120103928","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03436189,0.09276667,0.0013684263,0.5578185,0.0021093928,0.00011695625,0.001033294,0.000064459105,0.3103605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45737216,0.043122444,0.0013445163,0.094716266,0.0012127768,0.000101091275,0.0002397537,0.0001251176,0.40176594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99730897,0.0003936391,0.00005485876,0.0003438132,0.00072779984,0.001170994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821436,0.00064225536,0.00008834221,0.000057553993,0.0006725014,0.00032510894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00213732,0.00048756634,0.0005289508,0.00088169146,0.021363355,0.009398182,0.0020584222,0.014399162,0.014360878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004871981,0.00042903217,0.00038238047,0.0022717123,0.010821526,0.004895454,0.0019792325,0.0069191847,0.0008878468],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004816853,0.000037490016,0.0015349159,0.00009443352,0.000014028648,0.00030361224,0.008513254,0.00046319008,0.00017512805,0.6696168,0.31188962,0.0073094387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038017,0.00001416722,0.00529296,0.00024282189,0.000023418264,0.00006568115,0.011243159,0.00027043567,0.0003651538,0.07396333,0.9083861,0.00009476532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97811276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9906652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.075430445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.075430445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.084801994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5472888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120118180","doi":"","title":"Off the Grid: Federal Jurisdiction and the CanadianElectricity Sector","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Federal jurisdiction; International law; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.010151021767147281,"score_gpt":0.24455631328010327,"score_spread":0.234405291512956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120118180","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11285575,0.004709387,0.0027084218,0.10281197,0.0004558352,0.000090369016,0.0007929055,0.00009313811,0.7754822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9062348,0.002321843,0.0011085448,0.015628828,0.00012612046,0.00004394057,0.00017935524,0.00006728902,0.0742892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99218553,0.0007833999,0.00015248929,0.00070677465,0.0019530163,0.0042188712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906625,0.0027318378,0.0004629814,0.0005339304,0.003918655,0.0016901668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045061656,0.00042530525,0.0006078019,0.0023213816,0.02776893,0.017461855,0.0029392205,0.007817402,0.017290507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016556531,0.00066208444,0.0008007513,0.0066830185,0.014812069,0.005186068,0.00491804,0.0070575643,0.000499903],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004503443,0.00001994054,0.0038882873,0.00004238646,0.000016184327,0.00017802649,0.0025415232,0.0011447822,0.00013691981,0.9489615,0.033914026,0.009111397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014242137,0.00004763213,0.03379324,0.00066468556,0.00017878214,0.00021412628,0.02442906,0.005637077,0.0008384191,0.2720482,0.6617175,0.0002887674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99548906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8371508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16284922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28221148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97097623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121157541","doi":"","title":"The Institutional and Substantive Effectsof the Human Rights Act in the United Kingdom","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; International law; Law; Kingdom; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.054285899526758226,"score_gpt":0.343612094592552,"score_spread":0.28932619506579377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121157541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79482156,0.021997677,0.00054585637,0.04248378,0.00039304377,0.00006480854,0.00095126533,0.000024143299,0.13871789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872701,0.002506988,0.0000988014,0.0015475064,0.000041326184,0.0000164699,0.00006414101,0.000008164287,0.008446622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897474,0.0044161435,0.0007777025,0.00049282424,0.0018692086,0.0026967865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97868437,0.013289342,0.0029811286,0.0010124948,0.0030885416,0.0009441567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055256556,0.00022456577,0.00051465334,0.001910336,0.0036171558,0.008544933,0.00092876796,0.0030908922,0.011510981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029531306,0.0005206512,0.0005116701,0.0021167216,0.005642976,0.0028605233,0.0049518584,0.0024985964,0.0005385639],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023917528,0.0003864513,0.095540665,0.0014273897,0.00029361542,0.0034027472,0.025877025,0.0075781746,0.0017574942,0.74393797,0.040626615,0.07678012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028931472,0.00035065456,0.7114306,0.001756848,0.00044414375,0.000438631,0.028294433,0.002527541,0.001986545,0.04796357,0.2042208,0.00029682115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4764707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57642925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4764707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025252089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013817673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94739467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121303580","doi":"","title":"R' Blake Brown, A Trying Question: The Jury inNineteenth-Century Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Political science; Law; Legal history","score_opus":0.012610100967509145,"score_gpt":0.20214352779121061,"score_spread":0.18953342682370147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121303580","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02093171,0.024955453,0.0011803439,0.77195245,0.0029458897,0.00006764883,0.0005282644,0.000044658256,0.17739357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37089613,0.012252129,0.0016094536,0.2957388,0.0013472865,0.00012715188,0.000111229296,0.0001995172,0.3177184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949427,0.00089901214,0.00015710609,0.0007049586,0.00137049,0.0019255964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920499,0.0032914705,0.00022689647,0.00015103542,0.0028439835,0.0014366856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054185363,0.0004544686,0.00077172555,0.0013800977,0.048577666,0.013867685,0.003324677,0.020306965,0.020997198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016066998,0.000802014,0.00053754426,0.0020122621,0.023505928,0.008051874,0.003454487,0.019439833,0.0015837272],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044704106,0.0000346398,0.002112987,0.00006203882,0.000016886792,0.00035631232,0.014717536,0.00016093379,0.00010848465,0.490506,0.48128393,0.010595516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006274194,0.000023380026,0.006978589,0.00051472127,0.00003342391,0.0001339012,0.05396031,0.00021501101,0.00039001062,0.07265657,0.86486775,0.00016358765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96975976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.989952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057559226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057559226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.115206696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41762334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121574637","doi":"","title":"Revisiting the Doctrine of Intergenerational Equity inGlobal Environmental Governance","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Equity (law); Corporate governance; Political science; Environmental law; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Public economics; Finance","score_opus":0.018893057561618475,"score_gpt":0.3162500379848552,"score_spread":0.2973569804232367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121574637","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10793534,0.001439878,0.08091288,0.027618514,0.000254085,0.000040094266,0.0001254856,0.000049947397,0.7816237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97729546,0.00030432397,0.0026779245,0.0015989763,0.00009928482,0.000034477103,0.00001738273,0.000014598913,0.017957572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767274,0.00066582457,0.000071559436,0.0004995227,0.000508771,0.0005815597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99791604,0.00095063006,0.00019347742,0.0005386596,0.00027790744,0.0001233349],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037334561,0.00021808855,0.0003513026,0.0006463256,0.0026863536,0.005693188,0.0013364174,0.0030396117,0.00590834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057978546,0.00027017065,0.00044218835,0.00079810683,0.014986291,0.0067191278,0.0051530846,0.00458695,0.00039920778],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.271608e-7,0.0000015824394,0.00007929991,8.7285156e-7,5.229087e-7,0.0000053320923,0.00007707136,0.000092606635,0.0000055770224,0.99905413,0.00011449655,0.0005678094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004417375,0.0000033365343,0.00037202635,0.000014606581,0.0000033809224,0.000018639232,0.00021046649,0.00065637915,0.000063491374,0.9889537,0.009696774,0.0000027987192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011777232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01616617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011777232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043336414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003853454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03144294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121646640","doi":"","title":"The Personal Information Protectionand Electronic Documents Act: A LostOpportunity to Democratize Canada's\"Technological Society\"","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Information society; Political science; Internet privacy; Public relations; Business; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.00823376168224244,"score_gpt":0.24372380977963076,"score_spread":0.23549004809738833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121646640","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06308918,0.002355841,0.0020763401,0.58133894,0.0016412871,0.0001760118,0.0011403739,0.0003076328,0.3478745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31923112,0.0018809428,0.0032614784,0.14929672,0.0005623317,0.00012116232,0.00039931477,0.0001776799,0.5250692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9847698,0.0009524932,0.00024115505,0.0006955788,0.008496753,0.0048443205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877109,0.0028045466,0.0005348593,0.00082469475,0.0041490584,0.003975825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053753564,0.0007307244,0.00050084427,0.002612219,0.031338107,0.018184094,0.003482802,0.019435644,0.02087042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017568791,0.0009081889,0.0009836096,0.0029243673,0.01563481,0.0047825496,0.006117566,0.017782489,0.0021509207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040566923,0.000110572866,0.003544078,0.00005174717,0.000024119188,0.00028990253,0.0049700597,0.00047187225,0.0006648122,0.6618761,0.3017875,0.02616879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005165694,0.000035637866,0.0129307145,0.00015476382,0.000054788572,0.00010397986,0.0057347007,0.0011056535,0.0010229793,0.031689424,0.9469742,0.00014144079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9919369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9961624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11154068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11154068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.43810904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8092881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121699755","doi":"","title":"A \"Reasonable\" Expectation of Sexual Privacy intheDigital Age","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privacy law; Information privacy; Internet privacy; Law; Psychology; Business; Computer science; Political science; Privacy policy","score_opus":0.027124936271374533,"score_gpt":0.3105962681194601,"score_spread":0.2834713318480856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121699755","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4135898,0.0007933464,0.02617099,0.10664178,0.00032792176,0.0001305031,0.00044077614,0.00010691796,0.45179796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99058425,0.00007225288,0.0007090865,0.0037564533,0.00005166237,0.000020436008,0.000020946689,0.000003938676,0.004781136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940965,0.0023173655,0.0003061022,0.00058238197,0.0009906605,0.0017068728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98533857,0.007424387,0.0017821919,0.0017004473,0.002126219,0.001628132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007992514,0.00023651369,0.00034994082,0.00070277596,0.0047066454,0.0060643014,0.00089300907,0.0055803196,0.011580829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034248844,0.0003114877,0.00040479837,0.00031448234,0.0067905528,0.0040448564,0.002745727,0.004592967,0.000891238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000909046,0.00008121405,0.011344582,0.000025726942,0.000016049671,0.000885544,0.0059580407,0.0004885197,0.0003995731,0.96954244,0.0043742685,0.0067930566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000963065,0.00021568846,0.017001674,0.00017150915,0.00005899317,0.0030063784,0.020675892,0.0038231,0.0023782605,0.89454937,0.0579391,0.00008369017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010126338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013695268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011580829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024450703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052475836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04226899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121763336","doi":"","title":"Property Ownership by Married WomenIn Victorian Ontario","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Business; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021994916112235797,"score_gpt":0.19855523737741052,"score_spread":0.1765603212651747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121763336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9805588,0.0005798387,0.00003793891,0.0017160886,0.000012752217,0.000021629847,0.0017146588,0.0000036669444,0.015354698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9545454,0.00083173305,0.00004349101,0.00024956942,0.00000990507,0.000012735136,0.00042099901,0.0000055184987,0.043880656],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940944,0.00004235221,0.0000254149,0.000052046435,0.00015803763,0.00031282083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981324,0.00013795798,0.000533249,0.00006774697,0.0004196835,0.0007089058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039861226,0.00011573975,0.00021492154,0.00076416455,0.004596018,0.0016618131,0.0007967584,0.00052703946,0.00985952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001959012,0.00030806303,0.00021608206,0.0029265108,0.0010633589,0.000764347,0.0012547654,0.00056996685,0.0005480818],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010915748,0.0000714282,0.91608465,0.00006914665,0.00002805022,0.0006716979,0.05091674,0.000120272074,0.00035381818,0.0037228116,0.009333712,0.018518507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007710839,0.000031081734,0.9026366,0.00006838297,0.0000140589955,0.00015417987,0.0594384,0.0001673664,0.00013522216,0.00024882238,0.03707881,0.000019405577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9832871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021063283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021063283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017134596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15282553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122095553","doi":"","title":"The Legislature, The Executive and The Courts:The Delicate Balance of Power or Who is RunningThis Country Anyway?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Balance (ability); Executive power; Power (physics); Law; Separation of powers; Political science; Legislation; Law and economics; Economics; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.012996224039834196,"score_gpt":0.26635117729895375,"score_spread":0.25335495325911955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122095553","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021832343,0.020834703,0.0015840967,0.7469436,0.0012622265,0.000008077243,0.00010509449,0.000024465871,0.20740543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7220047,0.018291201,0.0010430607,0.15210418,0.002894864,0.00004745265,0.000077581324,0.000092738264,0.103444174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99601895,0.0014956034,0.000070013346,0.00045674684,0.0005746004,0.0013841492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961598,0.0014679685,0.00041696132,0.00018182144,0.000491736,0.0012816774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059447736,0.00035595064,0.00084963336,0.001183246,0.012568097,0.028772898,0.0017115794,0.010674862,0.02687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008346467,0.00052436866,0.0003323526,0.0023826053,0.031285938,0.026203882,0.004132928,0.011897755,0.0023913828],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019792524,0.00002869118,0.0010749404,0.000028459433,0.000012569178,0.00005599371,0.0040782825,0.000050221646,0.000071341245,0.94170284,0.040499907,0.012376819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034148023,0.000023520071,0.0042872224,0.00064779876,0.00003839175,0.00007544044,0.0345033,0.00020593696,0.00025031558,0.59687304,0.36300552,0.00005530922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08154324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20938341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99110466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0088953525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018157667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16213721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122224998","doi":"","title":"Bad Company! the Assumptions Behind Proxy Advisors' Voting Recommendations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Voting; Incentive; Accounting; Corporation; Political science; Business; Welfare economics; Management; Economics; Law; Market economy; Politics","score_opus":0.01902477234677208,"score_gpt":0.247989263637209,"score_spread":0.22896449129043692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122224998","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05967854,0.0030341502,0.21200989,0.32860804,0.0026103056,0.00043831297,0.0026675807,0.0004955965,0.39045763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89473474,0.0013628763,0.044747546,0.016685078,0.0020540033,0.0003783623,0.00052653614,0.000109781264,0.03940112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98215103,0.009560328,0.00087549584,0.0029356023,0.0033443705,0.0011332049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9230329,0.05051894,0.0064908634,0.010139282,0.008385311,0.0014326974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021968905,0.0003786998,0.00076044485,0.0013558083,0.0023039577,0.0055786157,0.0026882067,0.005459772,0.014334686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13706659,0.0004960078,0.0006484919,0.0014531547,0.006346582,0.006142291,0.0013742057,0.005878237,0.0043960996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008853843,0.000024677707,0.0031801965,0.00006688721,0.000024453553,0.00013884674,0.0010289388,0.0021944582,0.00012399274,0.939857,0.031044437,0.02222758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001132939,0.000035486828,0.0027241255,0.00019407689,0.000034580644,0.0001764857,0.00073142536,0.024325468,0.00041630454,0.87051564,0.10066553,0.00006756442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02251398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015843242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02251398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044144304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028591675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.116184056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122428691","doi":"","title":"Ministerial Misfeasance: R. v. Morris and a UniqueEarly Privacy Breach","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Computer security; Law; Internet privacy; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.0197245418296705,"score_gpt":0.28760336063646547,"score_spread":0.267878818806795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122428691","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.124396436,0.0033442245,0.0033762944,0.44279477,0.0010372554,0.000048671198,0.000091922164,0.00020187016,0.4247086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86444527,0.00095611875,0.0012437957,0.07694703,0.00035855174,0.000034868233,0.000015546253,0.00007670766,0.055922106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99487346,0.0016714673,0.00017741369,0.00066233263,0.0010333321,0.0015819725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959025,0.001961912,0.00036108238,0.0006738663,0.0004456757,0.0006550596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006518953,0.00030335176,0.000450056,0.00047184658,0.009797911,0.0068656113,0.0017032744,0.014021698,0.004756597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01836393,0.0005398302,0.00051563786,0.0004590857,0.009790091,0.003602141,0.0056287865,0.015318901,0.00078623515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006783298,0.000044508615,0.0032859596,0.000038586797,0.00002412847,0.0023209138,0.01168963,0.00023680646,0.0006669684,0.8934218,0.07729218,0.010910652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081743,0.00010524816,0.0073216045,0.00047791467,0.00015583787,0.0046334043,0.014650554,0.0014331609,0.0031847216,0.3336127,0.63414663,0.00019651848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04655831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09041911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9534417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005607175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009816494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.092574656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122476124","doi":"","title":"Reorganizations, Sales, and the Changing Face of Restructuring in Canada: Quantitative Outcomes of 2012 and 2013 CCAA Proceedings","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restructuring; Face (sociological concept); Business; Accounting; Finance; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.009913395108357417,"score_gpt":0.2432080656075396,"score_spread":0.23329467049918218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122476124","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9661706,0.00080687273,0.00020425855,0.0028030672,0.00003081294,0.00009500074,0.006024421,0.00003469861,0.023830207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898783,0.00039010003,0.00012862956,0.00022800517,0.000026577494,0.000039886934,0.0028566676,0.000016688844,0.006435062],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99396026,0.00047767218,0.00022445338,0.00035637655,0.0030062122,0.0019751326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9753956,0.004271919,0.0065863845,0.0005827883,0.008228335,0.0049350443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029778641,0.00026247845,0.0006210867,0.005218318,0.0069786464,0.0070558838,0.001830581,0.0016604593,0.0045336043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020762188,0.00030514522,0.00038496987,0.01115507,0.003300563,0.0017462855,0.0026607027,0.0025753165,0.0005610016],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006816208,0.00047650718,0.8615929,0.00017240197,0.00019252904,0.00076472526,0.029926518,0.0046099247,0.0007366666,0.015739808,0.035893694,0.04921279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013599445,0.00003258867,0.9640313,0.000046424415,0.000016785243,0.000041642368,0.02136177,0.0010057738,0.0001821909,0.00047274798,0.012726595,0.00006861156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.982349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9914445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06058687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06058687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042711105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43959057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122569314","doi":"","title":"Structures of Judgment: How the ModernSupreme Court of Canada Organizes its Reasons","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; International law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.02497555007228185,"score_gpt":0.26464781071650384,"score_spread":0.23967226064422198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122569314","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15938056,0.0013650436,0.0075579453,0.03569614,0.0002764498,0.000104170955,0.00037750046,0.00013037461,0.7951118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9340024,0.0003241607,0.0022131775,0.0018756127,0.00005630184,0.000034216402,0.0000943706,0.00011800332,0.061281756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931704,0.0012732476,0.00012604153,0.0008596483,0.0020078851,0.002562794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914375,0.002230948,0.00029120294,0.0006750613,0.0035252448,0.0018401319],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004897784,0.0003416743,0.0004661977,0.0029875706,0.03160671,0.025257882,0.0030394907,0.0056881127,0.018463798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020034382,0.00081425416,0.00065161,0.0035758587,0.025245385,0.00500672,0.0047519356,0.0057837632,0.0011957359],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002270392,0.000016219106,0.0023838794,0.00001098976,0.000011642301,0.00012832062,0.017706722,0.0006929063,0.00017561094,0.9493154,0.019142399,0.0103931995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006229661,0.000026996167,0.023747642,0.00023261644,0.000074594485,0.00010933396,0.04515479,0.0044364478,0.0009047591,0.39955118,0.5254694,0.00022996472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97203344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98888993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12598555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12598555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16155368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9140934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122596293","doi":"","title":"Hit Them Where it Hurts: State Responses to Biker Gangsin Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.0418679837424621,"score_gpt":0.3227131730292298,"score_spread":0.2808451892867677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122596293","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85753167,0.00041251935,0.0002258506,0.05043523,0.00030696823,0.00015847504,0.00021393466,0.000023236955,0.0906921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9590112,0.00035445008,0.00011118379,0.006177938,0.00003677273,0.000052710984,0.000080065576,0.000017443248,0.034158245],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99547297,0.0006870275,0.00006753329,0.00020538678,0.000817699,0.002749261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906228,0.0011103253,0.0004967527,0.00015693558,0.0025098438,0.0051032994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024370523,0.00030403823,0.00046228818,0.0015277454,0.058785196,0.009465283,0.0025808257,0.004857302,0.013736434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009186287,0.00041939376,0.0003708553,0.0026925628,0.006842209,0.0014137728,0.0072132978,0.0071969284,0.00052811],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043033008,0.00081399333,0.18236144,0.0001440558,0.0001347512,0.0028010777,0.5014273,0.0016908835,0.0009630515,0.06429887,0.19395624,0.05097805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038064434,0.00006424375,0.06748548,0.000101761616,0.000038737788,0.00008832168,0.80501693,0.0005649389,0.00019410797,0.0025946663,0.12373796,0.00007483522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9907348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99781513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09160013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09160013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16293693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66460854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122804512","doi":"","title":"Revising Canada's Ethical Rules for Judges Returningto Practice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal ethics; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.07271359044952126,"score_gpt":0.3724877803201102,"score_spread":0.29977418987058896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122804512","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053301256,0.0027052506,0.010426344,0.625692,0.0050191856,0.0011284811,0.00059561053,0.00035925186,0.3007726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52678275,0.0018522124,0.023067936,0.32528198,0.0016213557,0.0009189018,0.00028641673,0.0004867761,0.11970166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8482053,0.029408852,0.010309203,0.011115144,0.057122346,0.04383926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.72384727,0.13776453,0.00638212,0.01055346,0.09376761,0.027685015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10114315,0.0011669169,0.0023226575,0.006343073,0.05199181,0.03710781,0.012824896,0.06548964,0.009589678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2493584,0.0031502724,0.0024848755,0.00467077,0.028234381,0.007524053,0.00913657,0.058182698,0.0016421896],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010347872,0.00013467562,0.007108721,0.00018239606,0.000084359315,0.00063793606,0.0186217,0.0013547087,0.0006076391,0.61934996,0.3303944,0.02142012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041791942,0.00016000296,0.02357244,0.003344821,0.0004370145,0.00051808957,0.035894156,0.0041629747,0.002594379,0.16680807,0.76114607,0.00094417325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9558825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9827558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12417116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12417116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.49576187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90092903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123222988","doi":"","title":"Reassessing the Constitutional Foundation ofDelegated Legislation in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Foundation (evidence); Law; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.029040781574877356,"score_gpt":0.2900123740432471,"score_spread":0.26097159246836976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123222988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48171338,0.0030499548,0.001978347,0.12731709,0.00040332685,0.00019162564,0.0013996534,0.00007177794,0.38387474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96417004,0.00082994066,0.00073430804,0.009267946,0.00006618375,0.000038951745,0.00014389095,0.00004311907,0.024705626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98339164,0.0016860563,0.00043988062,0.0014196014,0.0053974027,0.0076655187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9700561,0.01191446,0.0010921073,0.0012220878,0.013243284,0.0024718845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010349708,0.00031253148,0.00085783616,0.0042050565,0.039568596,0.021103146,0.004570299,0.007972955,0.011047564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03944316,0.00084904785,0.00070116937,0.0064380444,0.020062272,0.0038219464,0.0050772517,0.010728541,0.0003462744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054763364,0.00004987122,0.014037704,0.00006342697,0.000039121678,0.00030123157,0.019046918,0.00090854167,0.00038600632,0.932769,0.020790985,0.011552293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019422891,0.00010873529,0.15130351,0.0009209197,0.0004977645,0.0002186817,0.10740769,0.005605357,0.0029667227,0.19279152,0.5374617,0.0005231079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9957475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21938276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21938276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.392744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90540534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123226226","doi":"","title":"The Stakes in Steak: Examining Barriers to and Opportunitiesfor Alternatives to Animal Products in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science","score_opus":0.017263932688144048,"score_gpt":0.22377357290457944,"score_spread":0.2065096402164354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123226226","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8386415,0.0016282352,0.0003462837,0.028502373,0.000054540007,0.000084297135,0.00029107832,0.0000127102985,0.13043897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98048717,0.0007105768,0.00016619105,0.0019701654,0.000005442583,0.000011728486,0.00004981715,0.000009085243,0.01658977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934627,0.00045524148,0.00010484452,0.00030373436,0.0022382387,0.003435311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898164,0.0028290492,0.00075039983,0.0001926846,0.0037575208,0.0026538225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002391706,0.00020101585,0.00034847317,0.0016571592,0.018498236,0.008973887,0.002279468,0.003323017,0.011693412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010120729,0.00039194536,0.00044207662,0.0025895345,0.007201212,0.0028275389,0.0035066847,0.004723814,0.00024362764],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006140806,0.0008491778,0.28192127,0.00047462335,0.00013377093,0.0035678186,0.103879355,0.003439879,0.0020981045,0.4426503,0.06515275,0.095218904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007911971,0.0001641231,0.34959838,0.000863289,0.00016244026,0.0004046284,0.37263572,0.0039371457,0.0015269445,0.025250703,0.24515481,0.00022266757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99675876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99917847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13562648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13562648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1984497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9840436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123241056","doi":"","title":"Time to Unpack the Juggernaut?: Reflections on the Canadian Federal Parliamentary Debates on \"Cyberbullying\"","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal and Policy Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Government (linguistics); Ideology; Law enforcement; Politics; Criminal law; Law; Criminology; Sociology; Public administration","score_opus":0.04187936068515336,"score_gpt":0.3272539980342994,"score_spread":0.28537463734914603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123241056","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0861678,0.027315985,0.0014805627,0.7645115,0.0046859854,0.00010702274,0.0003355334,0.000087040156,0.11530856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8400271,0.008395817,0.0013100529,0.11099798,0.000688598,0.000092414426,0.00009999522,0.00018135378,0.038206764],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9729476,0.0064921207,0.0005178066,0.001547531,0.009523371,0.008971644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9687442,0.01366762,0.0012618673,0.0005817367,0.009671729,0.006072855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020749992,0.0009007328,0.0010942703,0.005534658,0.09981679,0.027972551,0.006012098,0.015692562,0.007867225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03102793,0.0013300432,0.0010540541,0.00724839,0.048409842,0.007285935,0.0083534755,0.01780338,0.0007263768],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001306843,0.00006693544,0.0031402907,0.000509474,0.0000440528,0.0013312649,0.5370404,0.000443355,0.0012141846,0.2485124,0.17601416,0.03155284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023842143,0.000019733472,0.0076736156,0.00068135565,0.000040199197,0.00014252574,0.27967128,0.00023360789,0.0005456431,0.008821687,0.70190746,0.00023907822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99324906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99567765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70028496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.299715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2866395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8122313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123270099","doi":"","title":"Environmental Assessment as Planning and Disclosure Tool: Greenpeace Canada v. Canada (A.G.)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Supreme court; Humanities; Context (archaeology); Ethnology; Law; Sociology; Geography; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.014996918391552167,"score_gpt":0.27184906309477247,"score_spread":0.2568521447032203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123270099","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02870093,0.009659774,0.0033932258,0.5918394,0.002529079,0.0002325224,0.0010909571,0.00014521008,0.362409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.457102,0.0056235706,0.0028784703,0.4188935,0.0008722678,0.00022377157,0.00036935165,0.00009989728,0.113937125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98490393,0.0019634531,0.0003452331,0.0012603077,0.007228892,0.0042982395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98992795,0.0034311626,0.00040884456,0.00030998694,0.004448899,0.0014731064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0091309985,0.00053157046,0.00039025472,0.0010980174,0.024232088,0.0109763825,0.0038749785,0.017028794,0.004864201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017186612,0.00061811693,0.0007551526,0.0021274693,0.007971243,0.0030793224,0.0028024472,0.011167711,0.0005066548],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005914094,0.000030474026,0.004255146,0.000080363054,0.000030008552,0.0013293249,0.0068871174,0.00062136754,0.00052566844,0.52535933,0.44457462,0.016247343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012202417,0.000052252508,0.01462498,0.00041114129,0.000113583475,0.00052687124,0.009266392,0.0020419774,0.0013883632,0.053640097,0.9174513,0.0003608975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9814074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9885389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08306353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08306353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22373343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6026709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123312319","doi":"","title":"From Law to Legal Studies and Beyond: 50 Yearsof Law and Legal Studies at Carleton University","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Empirical legal studies; Legal history; Political science; Legal research; Legal profession; Black letter law; Comparative law; Civil law (Civil law); Philosophy of law; Legal realism; Jurisprudence; Legal opinion; Private law; Public law","score_opus":0.04276154610866918,"score_gpt":0.3387218223215021,"score_spread":0.29596027621283294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123312319","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12113625,0.47306547,0.0005364218,0.30392852,0.0039798715,0.00011932045,0.0006150036,0.00009086229,0.09652826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47445554,0.24522987,0.0008339577,0.059507735,0.0021320279,0.00025458954,0.0006683901,0.00023676937,0.21668123],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854299,0.0049970928,0.00041622765,0.0009624797,0.0030744986,0.0051198266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9662131,0.004889156,0.0009917831,0.00072365697,0.004075028,0.023107309],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014331094,0.00081446447,0.0012960678,0.007998725,0.026276097,0.029809782,0.00229433,0.0065035145,0.038256127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014042823,0.0011914683,0.00044244045,0.013123599,0.017128276,0.018240627,0.024730336,0.0064987345,0.004175634],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001970871,0.0014326618,0.035188466,0.0012429388,0.00006089494,0.00089363573,0.2713535,0.00019694348,0.0010358386,0.0553226,0.36089873,0.2721767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011455726,0.000068077556,0.036533512,0.0019410338,0.000010439404,0.0001373574,0.12767649,0.00004916938,0.00025858197,0.004045013,0.8292087,0.000060216877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2205238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.62967664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9525913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047408726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0982127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43848044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123355475","doi":"","title":"Employee Pension Rights and the False Promiseof Trust Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pension; Law; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.03449696587863101,"score_gpt":0.2066261916260386,"score_spread":0.17212922574740758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123355475","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18469326,0.0068752016,0.02015826,0.3447943,0.00070034014,0.000053727752,0.0003606031,0.00007607977,0.44228816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809699,0.0007066094,0.00055131764,0.00505598,0.0004017429,0.000019372927,0.00002283146,0.000014112598,0.01225824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993129,0.0024089273,0.00032689582,0.00089463,0.0014658518,0.0017746435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9763826,0.015605576,0.0022174665,0.0031320895,0.0018311754,0.0008310718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01290048,0.00025941042,0.0006377323,0.00083599077,0.005886837,0.010656446,0.001261804,0.013639305,0.010378162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037825912,0.0006251,0.00043765496,0.0008876442,0.019363122,0.0119453855,0.0036191223,0.009724104,0.0006907323],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014258728,0.0000086577875,0.0003855287,0.0000064765895,0.0000027837648,0.00004308971,0.00045468638,0.00011006953,0.000024727613,0.9942941,0.0031018127,0.0015537696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018208762,0.000008104894,0.00075961504,0.000038581824,0.000008748783,0.00004488341,0.0004609581,0.0006992928,0.00013130967,0.9811943,0.016618267,0.000017779596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01748136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017799461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01748136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0080317855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065862956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068225086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123531963","doi":"","title":"Reading the Judicial Mind: Predicting the Courts' Reactionto the Use of Neuroscientific Evidence for Lie Detection","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lie detection; Reading (process); Psychology; Law; Political science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.12175589730601961,"score_gpt":0.3621088865846682,"score_spread":0.24035298927864862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123531963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951984,0.00011196242,0.00022557276,0.00066769833,0.00003484703,0.000026621086,0.000062505685,0.0000073637652,0.003665011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982443,0.00014173654,0.0002992715,0.00035152302,0.000050208746,0.000010577967,0.000090593814,0.000008469382,0.0008033733],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985455,0.0005786232,0.00012637972,0.00015057913,0.00043419158,0.00016467468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9468228,0.037898216,0.009891862,0.0012895786,0.0024465218,0.0016509282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029539075,0.00029056586,0.00023307586,0.00091953133,0.00048608647,0.0021496345,0.0004291158,0.00242492,0.008490323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08235534,0.00032280193,0.00024218642,0.00032694594,0.0008251085,0.0011267698,0.0008081009,0.001903146,0.00081070745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006873813,0.0025409763,0.8620449,0.00021463136,0.00028944016,0.0018795248,0.006946447,0.0017681827,0.05023166,0.003653235,0.004141129,0.059416085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019967812,0.0009543688,0.97162545,0.00007400904,0.000107602355,0.00080901233,0.003253851,0.007159709,0.00896446,0.004873839,0.0019069791,0.000071120674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003058583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005077543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008490323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006140437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054089347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028402984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123846341","doi":"","title":"Thresholds of Actionable Mental Harm in Negligence:A Policy-Based Appraisal","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Plaintiff; Prejudice (legal term); Damages; Compensation (psychology); Legitimacy; Political science; Limiting; Law; Mental illness; Mental health; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychiatry; Politics","score_opus":0.046588036081783836,"score_gpt":0.43052370568568976,"score_spread":0.3839356696039059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123846341","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06052485,0.17569785,0.013081991,0.59485584,0.0029156846,0.00028671965,0.00033695952,0.00014737739,0.15215273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85730046,0.08932703,0.004899631,0.039799694,0.0021909673,0.00020134274,0.00012769218,0.000043746837,0.0061094444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97032535,0.008028222,0.0020870524,0.0014895626,0.013369063,0.004700698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94637537,0.036258448,0.004612289,0.00095859024,0.009859821,0.0019354711],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017242713,0.0007516487,0.0012137046,0.007168698,0.0043234457,0.016695956,0.0043411064,0.0113840075,0.0037663945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049103662,0.00060782616,0.0010430625,0.0042183814,0.024972558,0.009745432,0.0047493293,0.008598483,0.00036511544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011186224,0.00013110614,0.004461449,0.0015092281,0.00004863615,0.0002900105,0.002872926,0.0049141226,0.00048350464,0.906443,0.011845853,0.06688825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009298293,0.000513916,0.03682725,0.010977655,0.00038665856,0.00067372515,0.02499123,0.008378466,0.0018757193,0.6803615,0.23461291,0.0003079649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32892486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30886734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32892486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07805645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09462233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6540206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124269426","doi":"","title":"Are Climate Change Policies Fair to Vulnerable Communities? the Impact of British Columbia's Carbon Tax and Australia's Carbon Pricing Policy on Indigenous Communities","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Carbon tax; Revenue; Climate change; Emissions trading; Disadvantaged; Political science; Politics; Public economics; Natural resource economics; Economics; Business; Economic growth; Finance; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.06984569229498805,"score_gpt":0.2746376265230765,"score_spread":0.20479193422808845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124269426","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91866887,0.0011905855,0.00042408257,0.013057601,0.0000555255,0.000054480366,0.00012168038,0.0000126788655,0.06641449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99670595,0.00035268412,0.00014186688,0.0006375538,0.000007529663,0.000012937549,0.000016245081,0.0000032075864,0.0021221],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99514955,0.0012067788,0.00008099756,0.00019235643,0.001190121,0.0021802194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946213,0.0012317126,0.0007449748,0.00025735918,0.0018777864,0.001266875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028389844,0.00020397663,0.00043504522,0.0010435644,0.0050425115,0.003862015,0.00091725576,0.0011506873,0.0030507357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010797598,0.00013749406,0.00029932853,0.001375088,0.004573912,0.001681281,0.0025369267,0.0016837496,0.00013268442],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013592702,0.0007693063,0.38908243,0.0008763647,0.0006673863,0.0030602284,0.055573706,0.0267243,0.0065655657,0.24009292,0.013434137,0.2617943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011134367,0.00030956563,0.81670886,0.0006476203,0.00027294538,0.00027823856,0.07850928,0.008039809,0.0017052828,0.03943492,0.0537955,0.00018670381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86417115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9111122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13582885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021474479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02689446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2732575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124431951","doi":"","title":"Multi-Disciplinary Professional Practices: AConsumer Welfare Perspective","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Perspective (graphical); Welfare; Political science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Law; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.08992156980875435,"score_gpt":0.4158058668522224,"score_spread":0.3258842970434681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124431951","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.124077685,0.007415468,0.007929208,0.2543544,0.0004909914,0.00007188092,0.00011102249,0.000026587775,0.60552275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9249364,0.0039818683,0.0015975804,0.017235955,0.00073860947,0.00009802647,0.00003566256,0.000017195085,0.05135861],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935992,0.0022907448,0.00017263899,0.00042582376,0.0012614485,0.0022501245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99031854,0.0035328474,0.00071761344,0.00038074036,0.0018785119,0.0031717413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004966876,0.000371349,0.00046341808,0.0049103475,0.016485322,0.013959307,0.0020381322,0.007451599,0.018778095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065672663,0.0004348205,0.00043058893,0.0026173661,0.021159638,0.008457727,0.008534525,0.004746328,0.00074041815],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027457249,0.00065685104,0.010282365,0.00007836761,0.000014167412,0.00091450795,0.017732337,0.00029159753,0.00023532436,0.91699183,0.012555623,0.040219616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045450226,0.0003153818,0.04627619,0.001299837,0.000051507745,0.0019044351,0.18983693,0.0015501949,0.0007322417,0.47959897,0.27831024,0.000078609104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040013276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1371831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040013276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016184025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014681737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11742389},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124516724","doi":"","title":"Death to Semelhago","year":2016,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Damages; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Philosophy; Common law; Humanities; Sociology","score_opus":0.05073519481133954,"score_gpt":0.3128993821918387,"score_spread":0.2621641873804992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124516724","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04489115,0.014256659,0.0018135521,0.20994514,0.010572256,0.0000663162,0.00033991007,0.0001776295,0.7179374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23982204,0.004202031,0.00059876905,0.14145318,0.0011520628,0.000044921133,0.00013195087,0.000100020276,0.612495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988243,0.00012968255,0.00002176187,0.0002361097,0.00034064156,0.0004473952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994948,0.00010789637,0.000024860366,0.000040942024,0.0001868399,0.0001446677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009868377,0.00048520137,0.00034979222,0.00045023402,0.013667053,0.0033861464,0.000942066,0.0062030526,0.012493493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031584364,0.0001876859,0.000457237,0.00033297704,0.0050895973,0.0016589725,0.0036417318,0.011243756,0.0022141426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000641787,0.000026948532,0.0015872282,0.000055962868,0.000018540273,0.0014888924,0.0053709187,0.00014159882,0.00056106754,0.5963999,0.36124372,0.03304095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009608337,0.000026623577,0.0010044888,0.00014449425,0.000010486531,0.0004170355,0.0018881301,0.000097076496,0.00033909242,0.019648433,0.9763945,0.000020053509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2565929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44628745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2565929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009269283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01603026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5101987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124582573","doi":"","title":"The Myth of Jus Tractatus in La Belle Province: Quebec's Gérin-Lajoie Statement","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Humanities; Mythology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.013422383359622316,"score_gpt":0.3019322652268119,"score_spread":0.28850988186718957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124582573","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04953286,0.043434553,0.0026362808,0.5144447,0.0068864133,0.00007873738,0.0008438774,0.00016967325,0.38197294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6312988,0.0070265243,0.0011233522,0.11300888,0.00094912696,0.00008591222,0.00015704686,0.00009767176,0.24625267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980483,0.00031800408,0.00005402994,0.0003093804,0.00060906354,0.0006612861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983109,0.000533187,0.00010921594,0.00006683071,0.0007030162,0.00027687964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014436336,0.00037370532,0.00036203917,0.00080567814,0.017742215,0.008422008,0.0020313447,0.0066919983,0.007419999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040887087,0.00035742033,0.00032191252,0.0010841128,0.011980206,0.0019635472,0.0017382867,0.008788434,0.0005509516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004763466,0.000023941777,0.0022242188,0.00008720542,0.000014735268,0.0007314905,0.008274704,0.00050536374,0.00044360585,0.7768012,0.19681536,0.01403046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031657895,0.000019167253,0.007003866,0.00039671524,0.000017442548,0.0002079228,0.005279296,0.00074222166,0.00033651982,0.023125635,0.9627242,0.000115198694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99225277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99343675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10319095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10319095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08414055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7487062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124884951","doi":"","title":"Law's Ambition and the Reconstruction of Role Moralityin Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; International law","score_opus":0.011589309574514189,"score_gpt":0.23826144138111421,"score_spread":0.22667213180660004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124884951","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2393153,0.0018615648,0.0022472988,0.07249776,0.00026785283,0.000073162046,0.00031491206,0.00004836075,0.68337375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9547553,0.0003397177,0.00036527534,0.0018617274,0.000021178541,0.00001305784,0.000031625797,0.000030733565,0.042581446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99214584,0.0012897175,0.000100381585,0.0007088801,0.0016787898,0.0040764315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99388254,0.0012365085,0.0002469237,0.00031193008,0.0026669095,0.0016552792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047777225,0.0002651724,0.0006566622,0.0021084202,0.038217813,0.017017242,0.0027804729,0.004996314,0.016378056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013621656,0.00044344223,0.0004310464,0.003761761,0.031773303,0.0036896192,0.0048742425,0.007071753,0.00048762676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003310879,0.000019475778,0.00279064,0.000017541537,0.0000072277735,0.00008271228,0.013641308,0.000359537,0.000085894295,0.96608114,0.009446845,0.007434613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009744066,0.00004701244,0.033022054,0.00026001802,0.00005714218,0.00011345368,0.089888684,0.0029300635,0.0006755242,0.3840449,0.48871323,0.00015045975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99074847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99571556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18581875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18581875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26501814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94433486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125173313","doi":"","title":"From Kyoto to Marrakech; A Long Walk throughthe Desert: Mirage Or Oasis?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Nuclear Issues and Defense","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Desert (philosophy); International law; Geology; Geography; Geochemistry; Archaeology; Earth science; Physical geography; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04878764854350702,"score_gpt":0.31208041688095467,"score_spread":0.26329276833744764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125173313","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11337242,0.014074624,0.0015055513,0.19501144,0.0031547793,0.000046106175,0.0001671154,0.00015195817,0.67251605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67495966,0.0029465635,0.0005858379,0.052860066,0.00052897685,0.000048562033,0.000048894624,0.0001455233,0.2678759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991578,0.00018387032,0.000021869932,0.000113995244,0.00011575694,0.0004066733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954385,0.0000853233,0.000048523023,0.00004935055,0.00007086162,0.0002020116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013643275,0.00037136278,0.00038491172,0.00041006517,0.017873924,0.0063535743,0.0006668777,0.0062263566,0.024919145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022530935,0.00018908047,0.00021889748,0.0004891134,0.011350837,0.006457243,0.004604757,0.006578818,0.0017683678],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016174368,0.000053411313,0.0025430967,0.000082004444,0.000015864905,0.0012413374,0.027033418,0.000060188406,0.0014749024,0.781536,0.16234206,0.02345603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002654818,0.000048290804,0.0047549494,0.00013301856,0.000015498492,0.00020819403,0.032541662,0.00005802661,0.0004335244,0.037792765,0.9239402,0.000047350048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08535495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23450433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08535495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004617688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059189782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16971624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125350492","doi":"","title":"Collective Bargaining in the Shadow of the CharterCathedral: Union Strategies in a Post B.C. HealthWorld","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Health Services Management and Policy","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shadow (psychology); Collective bargaining; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.08824051420492046,"score_gpt":0.38244857411846833,"score_spread":0.29420805991354787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125350492","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29711652,0.0017112037,0.0023195304,0.25820893,0.00094048236,0.00008183924,0.000053453827,0.000036089456,0.439532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91511846,0.0003403824,0.00033918716,0.012345376,0.00018619871,0.000047940786,0.000008391692,0.000019973833,0.07159414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949825,0.0015723145,0.000045891495,0.00032565213,0.00043001008,0.002643639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99709344,0.0013391834,0.00019193135,0.00012640371,0.00019541921,0.0010535868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008244175,0.0002671706,0.0003683817,0.0007270596,0.0395021,0.016343325,0.0015305862,0.01196647,0.021801326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072014853,0.00039355853,0.00044414468,0.0011809483,0.015295614,0.007578424,0.008361838,0.009501587,0.0009484175],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000092733724,0.00011544982,0.0018902755,0.000019567979,0.000007687979,0.0006702628,0.025761938,0.00046421637,0.0001957904,0.92186165,0.0340919,0.014828484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014136129,0.00018801217,0.014164357,0.00026741187,0.000035920242,0.00023671653,0.20534292,0.0022898654,0.00085482374,0.2679208,0.50845397,0.00010381583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09433402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24050069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.905666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01580763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021751367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18756986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125353779","doi":"","title":"Nickled and Dimed: The Dispute over Intellectual Property Rights inthe Bluenose II","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.04238115635794205,"score_gpt":0.21161449296386106,"score_spread":0.16923333660591902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125353779","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061874438,0.0057236454,0.0037466823,0.22012718,0.0013398102,0.00005355278,0.00020492653,0.00005573305,0.706874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43701044,0.0019341235,0.0014878296,0.060968854,0.00059106894,0.00008585613,0.00005389284,0.00013171305,0.49773625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961357,0.0011272866,0.00009684856,0.0005375963,0.0010439396,0.001058601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963152,0.0023629104,0.00021491115,0.00027648296,0.0005135014,0.00031713716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059050564,0.0004989526,0.00062106806,0.0011499439,0.014716771,0.013679297,0.0017736371,0.022027714,0.013053223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011686151,0.0008098929,0.00042291952,0.0013597861,0.018986946,0.013073443,0.007104406,0.019302782,0.0010144009],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027940483,0.0000125402385,0.00023704991,0.000014446726,0.0000036584702,0.00024356287,0.0034245446,0.000104745704,0.00014514413,0.9534314,0.03959538,0.0027596592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054730303,0.000027824297,0.0018881263,0.00022257536,0.000017952882,0.00014005706,0.008502222,0.0006608787,0.0007975144,0.3810684,0.6065314,0.000088310386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14962159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27124465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8503784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014287452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011055627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29750144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125510305","doi":"","title":"Foreseeably Unclear: The Meaning of the \"ReasonablyForeseeable\" Criterion for Access to Medical Assistancein Dying in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Law; Political science; Medicine; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02975658005082675,"score_gpt":0.31499844866712234,"score_spread":0.2852418686162956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125510305","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19853699,0.006086934,0.004943852,0.3092772,0.0007717807,0.00018263022,0.0014285605,0.000059299404,0.47871286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9788929,0.0007505184,0.0008538384,0.010170369,0.000113934286,0.00003448942,0.000082951825,0.000035126657,0.009065857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9735554,0.0057921577,0.0009524637,0.0018923982,0.0062892023,0.01151835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95799255,0.018646494,0.0017803803,0.0013891457,0.015069403,0.005122114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01753281,0.0004694065,0.001314982,0.0019584144,0.030592088,0.020856503,0.0055295792,0.011556369,0.008323886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.064453594,0.0008037025,0.00093648664,0.0034451478,0.031012671,0.0068366346,0.0066139735,0.017322468,0.0002795071],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055883556,0.000020620619,0.005730682,0.00005743402,0.000019831106,0.0002933878,0.008704291,0.00084106403,0.000085859116,0.9640191,0.015969414,0.00420245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015962507,0.00006864354,0.054179087,0.0015740672,0.00030365615,0.00038205812,0.060783178,0.009124188,0.00086323847,0.6506942,0.22120419,0.0006639703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9934297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9948338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18470748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18470748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.35586497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94562376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127901373","doi":"","title":"The Implications of UNCLOS for Canada's RegulatoryJurisdiction in the Offshore-The 200-Mile Limit and theContinental Shelf","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mile; United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; Submarine pipeline; Limit (mathematics); Political science; Oceanography; Geography; Law; International law; Geology; Mathematics; Geodesy","score_opus":0.006010186762721016,"score_gpt":0.2274425713559345,"score_spread":0.22143238459321346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127901373","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.108122535,0.0032392482,0.0017350148,0.3382694,0.001624709,0.000192014,0.001271765,0.00022142575,0.54532385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6081812,0.001984149,0.0019996774,0.20573637,0.000591267,0.00015204852,0.00030822394,0.00018648538,0.18086065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9852453,0.00079380884,0.00039319406,0.0010696051,0.0064019416,0.0060960995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97610044,0.007793049,0.0008025633,0.0008195249,0.010767291,0.0037172174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007832365,0.0006844681,0.00095409923,0.002331089,0.03342333,0.018180242,0.00617423,0.019243741,0.013779195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025987009,0.0012696057,0.0015720647,0.002628618,0.0146226,0.004484836,0.005005269,0.017315375,0.00089686963],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016236697,0.00017542698,0.014731131,0.0001472068,0.00007517526,0.0013178423,0.008779823,0.00362261,0.00086704746,0.68735695,0.2596878,0.023076598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029844185,0.0002000423,0.046687856,0.0012319918,0.0004193788,0.00046498765,0.04664528,0.0060905577,0.0026710182,0.11589956,0.7787231,0.0006678259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9914677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99652797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1231333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1231333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2736793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8933988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3130718974","doi":"","title":"Peter Aucoin, Mark D.Jarvis &Lori Turnbull,Democratizing the Constitution: Reforming ResponsibleGovernment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04424122050940862,"score_gpt":0.2707355482931368,"score_spread":0.22649432778372816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3130718974","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012176677,0.13299721,0.013438283,0.55897176,0.0030435806,0.0001360895,0.0011282254,0.00013359687,0.2779746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4034971,0.2006265,0.018325564,0.12233321,0.0041908068,0.00046937136,0.00069724914,0.00034955092,0.24951057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780625,0.0007342567,0.00009913864,0.00025859455,0.00071635086,0.0003854757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940713,0.0043592756,0.0003515198,0.0002207303,0.00071451993,0.00028267613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00348105,0.00066590565,0.00048714963,0.0022220016,0.008013988,0.00928911,0.0015375495,0.009614745,0.017290426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0093239155,0.00079147646,0.00059909915,0.0038703193,0.007896253,0.014746984,0.003033752,0.008874135,0.0027994425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005263535,0.00004109736,0.00056517095,0.00018971934,0.00001373827,0.00013916468,0.0023135727,0.0003614468,0.00016917463,0.70026416,0.28381938,0.01207078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007115638,0.000025975412,0.002883545,0.00046242608,0.000035125897,0.000086498876,0.0040615397,0.00036389768,0.001343752,0.48120674,0.50938606,0.0000732688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08060718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2391353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08060718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062487694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075104493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.160276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133561944","doi":"","title":"Tending the Bar: The \"Good Character\" Requirementfor Law Society Admission","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Character (mathematics); Law; Bar (unit); Political science; Geography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.029853419716642154,"score_gpt":0.31755118244864583,"score_spread":0.28769776273200365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133561944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21626663,0.00026488173,0.020342512,0.13798429,0.00096688623,0.00046708056,0.00023529308,0.00021518083,0.6232572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96914804,0.000051704938,0.0026434683,0.00589046,0.0002517331,0.00014960322,0.000045523306,0.000059512364,0.021759976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97825885,0.0057057627,0.0009951226,0.0025345718,0.005813013,0.0066926638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97035843,0.0071282685,0.0028066721,0.005425557,0.0064745788,0.007806542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010890076,0.00044320006,0.0013460495,0.0015802161,0.020198885,0.010008665,0.0024346206,0.0139664225,0.04864397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06068514,0.0008344837,0.00095252704,0.0012078816,0.026228294,0.008381182,0.010596428,0.012364158,0.0043314425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007767635,0.00015222425,0.0036468862,0.000035523233,0.000011050585,0.00017108407,0.002211535,0.0001694221,0.00047689062,0.97492313,0.008852457,0.009272085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000133643,0.00012052195,0.010768088,0.000102955055,0.000026117277,0.00046659782,0.006921258,0.0013335661,0.0009990425,0.92650163,0.05253526,0.000091302856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011066554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024853347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04864397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005313848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017592246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16273034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135674092","doi":"","title":"The Chemical Castration of Recidivist Sex Offenders inCanada: A Matter of Faith","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Faith; Criminology; Castration; Law; Political science; Psychology; Philosophy; Theology; Medicine; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.013876843022016515,"score_gpt":0.22995090531111978,"score_spread":0.21607406228910325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135674092","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97966856,0.00041301353,0.000040267365,0.005796712,0.00006685793,0.00003549897,0.00016880788,0.0000030917358,0.013807373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917393,0.00053171924,0.000043879078,0.0018159815,0.000059260685,0.000014373948,0.00007934086,0.0000025278662,0.0057136943],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796045,0.00043332097,0.00007529444,0.000090616435,0.0006214962,0.0008188812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930119,0.0013762293,0.002269434,0.00028567537,0.001906866,0.0011498426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015100633,0.00013969574,0.00026503793,0.0012801582,0.0035803535,0.0016676052,0.0012148179,0.0014924031,0.0038940127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012237297,0.00026892373,0.00027400733,0.0007472435,0.0015889874,0.00074563985,0.0009825414,0.0034684138,0.00034954207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006104214,0.000851831,0.9248326,0.000089893365,0.00007282446,0.0009973008,0.0067938995,0.00030212317,0.0006360946,0.007981508,0.009547755,0.047283772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026085734,0.0004332701,0.95953137,0.00010901257,0.00006126632,0.0006639481,0.025554689,0.0003629735,0.0010352526,0.00074599904,0.011452161,0.000024064466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1588213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37915623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8411787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031815108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051584165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3157937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3136036367","doi":"","title":"Canadian East Coast Offshore Oil and Gas Industry: SustainableDevelopment through Cooperative Federalism","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Offshore oil and gas; Submarine pipeline; Fossil fuel; Petroleum industry; East coast; International law; Environmental science; Petroleum engineering; Oceanography; Political science; Geology; Engineering; Law; Environmental engineering; Waste management","score_opus":0.018805250342699878,"score_gpt":0.2654769451978004,"score_spread":0.24667169485510054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3136036367","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08772524,0.0023099617,0.002318794,0.105021425,0.00034779587,0.0001379647,0.00044457175,0.00006534024,0.801629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8282743,0.0022558337,0.0018738974,0.009628957,0.000085608684,0.00008154967,0.00011542738,0.000025511023,0.15765892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99672395,0.00034755818,0.00006679241,0.0002731092,0.001053952,0.0015347113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963881,0.0008209201,0.00016420813,0.00025450936,0.0017929245,0.0005794371],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028181137,0.00036543372,0.0003015234,0.0013359498,0.016585773,0.007104379,0.0014507911,0.005491063,0.0121404305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067630056,0.00057454495,0.0004900984,0.0019399776,0.006590977,0.002724003,0.0037816886,0.0041897018,0.00033187133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026878031,0.000023509798,0.0026073975,0.000052846826,0.000015836895,0.0001973372,0.0016178509,0.0011237648,0.00021379301,0.94247055,0.041745644,0.009904718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000110631365,0.000046825415,0.027467854,0.00041894667,0.0001394488,0.00014014888,0.011152438,0.004632634,0.0012130605,0.13509706,0.81939834,0.0001825482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9896874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99669373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.897506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10249399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19312829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74364936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3136884324","doi":"","title":"Acceptance Speech for Lifetime Achievement Award from Canadian Prison Lawyers Association","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Association (psychology); Psychology; Criminology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.012617326367680422,"score_gpt":0.2801683537323299,"score_spread":0.2675510273646495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3136884324","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22867067,0.001778685,0.0010813402,0.17680502,0.017476004,0.0014201552,0.021380605,0.0010531618,0.55033433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32547498,0.0004819251,0.000571792,0.015449558,0.0015019155,0.00042062084,0.0033312826,0.00017327683,0.6525947],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99042726,0.00035335703,0.0002697274,0.00045538487,0.005323948,0.0031703052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.972493,0.0020938802,0.0005484185,0.00053728954,0.017360551,0.006966842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006086657,0.000513106,0.00071706524,0.0032052214,0.012974808,0.0050707622,0.0019288935,0.0052968757,0.04281477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022888789,0.00045412217,0.0005858065,0.0013754285,0.0009752018,0.000915598,0.0022367183,0.0072317645,0.008618395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023727679,0.00018367953,0.021357933,0.00005558866,0.000017957345,0.0003188425,0.0019083311,0.00013349456,0.0007447515,0.006510987,0.94247836,0.026052909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009851735,0.00022951407,0.3299886,0.00016810225,0.00008566782,0.00014669134,0.010084386,0.0010567881,0.0017615707,0.0011111205,0.65507156,0.00019740568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82602197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9164334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17397803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01932383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056222677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3500052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137293715","doi":"","title":"No Longer \"naked and shivering outside her gates\":Establishing Law as a Full-time On-campus AcademicDiscipline at McGill University inthe Nineteenth Century","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Shivering; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.0142658996002793,"score_gpt":0.21083091975944307,"score_spread":0.19656502015916377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137293715","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4655009,0.0025010572,0.0035218177,0.18597469,0.0014833953,0.00012821623,0.00007265117,0.0002009057,0.34061643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86879957,0.0002874423,0.0006093502,0.016674843,0.000114202056,0.000042106814,0.000011046345,0.00011975878,0.11334167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98251003,0.00515642,0.00021628528,0.0019312958,0.0017272083,0.008458617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9834969,0.0022664324,0.0008057377,0.0006447881,0.0026319325,0.0101542445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012280457,0.0005583069,0.00066508114,0.001634535,0.0937718,0.02841762,0.0049033994,0.009538406,0.016930716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01446239,0.0010507251,0.00040387348,0.00165994,0.09687287,0.010774693,0.020391563,0.020060977,0.0013863081],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044767767,0.00014462823,0.005478598,0.000026550626,0.0000063217954,0.00078591844,0.40707916,0.00012057295,0.0009247996,0.51524353,0.047462884,0.022682255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025429797,0.0001189169,0.011022787,0.0002143417,0.000019904723,0.00029317188,0.3283182,0.0003073907,0.0011607498,0.02784254,0.6305231,0.0001535388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6382437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87737894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91712207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.082877934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13801135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72777355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139156576","doi":"","title":"Non-Majority Union Representation conforms to ILOFreedom of Association Principles and (Potentially)Promotes Inter-Union Collaboration: New ZealandLessons for Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Political science; Association (psychology); European union; Law; International trade; Psychology; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.027173079031915397,"score_gpt":0.28508857843679286,"score_spread":0.25791549940487746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3139156576","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59453875,0.00064979395,0.0018840985,0.048049472,0.00027568557,0.0002613748,0.0003799709,0.00006563368,0.3538952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90915465,0.00022981118,0.0010172031,0.002259155,0.000021423628,0.000052306525,0.00008643683,0.00004001617,0.08713894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98973733,0.00084812543,0.00022192168,0.0006677394,0.0026083675,0.005916555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921468,0.0008907075,0.00044154335,0.0004050064,0.002536181,0.0035798203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041706264,0.00023346907,0.00048275813,0.00096914516,0.03271608,0.010143861,0.0019401709,0.0023190891,0.024096955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011529362,0.00045523822,0.00043237564,0.00187389,0.004602736,0.0022342731,0.006198005,0.004535503,0.0009784605],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003663855,0.00040172337,0.12453143,0.00026165295,0.000063186366,0.0010786502,0.107988715,0.0009414104,0.002543735,0.49269995,0.08968441,0.17943873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015580757,0.00022254177,0.28562582,0.00041635355,0.000101682126,0.00038922633,0.16876505,0.001954085,0.0015199394,0.020365728,0.52026564,0.00021798968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9829549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99663687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060044654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.060044654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21260928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4356565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3151050557","doi":"","title":"Debtor in Possession Financing:The Jursidiction Of Canadian Courts toGrant Superpriority Financing in CCAAApplications","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Debtor; Business; Finance; Creditor; Debt","score_opus":0.012936404485704841,"score_gpt":0.22225516030508374,"score_spread":0.2093187558193789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3151050557","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30710953,0.0053423145,0.0018398426,0.07647498,0.00064438285,0.0001987788,0.0008623358,0.000095010895,0.60743284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89718306,0.0022045872,0.00088097,0.009494047,0.00018381911,0.000052748193,0.00019528702,0.00005292011,0.089752436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932499,0.0006378759,0.0001377395,0.00042558982,0.0020490212,0.0035000003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98514533,0.004483342,0.00072160724,0.0005820658,0.0070201396,0.0020474936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005588393,0.00028428124,0.0004233261,0.0032284968,0.02279236,0.014864178,0.0027951712,0.0050743767,0.017258007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026609492,0.00066288095,0.00055076304,0.004363679,0.00660587,0.0038784954,0.0033820583,0.0063894526,0.00057411625],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010818626,0.000087686225,0.026157156,0.0000937694,0.000024111825,0.00088221487,0.0109676225,0.0009356622,0.00042856063,0.8176663,0.10354144,0.03910721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001173354,0.00008111982,0.10595804,0.000867346,0.0003038069,0.00062598544,0.03931316,0.005735194,0.002094789,0.07849259,0.766104,0.00030660318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9863615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9962914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10607001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10607001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20101576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7695954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154150950","doi":"","title":"How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the GATS:An Examination of the Impact of the General Agreementon Trade in Services on the Canadian Health-Care System","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General Agreement on Trade in Services; Legal service; Political science; Health care; Business; Public relations; Law; International trade; World trade","score_opus":0.019311952829334657,"score_gpt":0.28553233498082337,"score_spread":0.2662203821514887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154150950","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28275567,0.002764607,0.0005072878,0.37965623,0.00039738155,0.00018015558,0.00037584154,0.000029445919,0.33333343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9372749,0.0019866491,0.00035540177,0.036940437,0.00008850071,0.000055801585,0.00009608293,0.000037560072,0.023164645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9778286,0.0039216955,0.00025512473,0.0006284947,0.0052172216,0.012148753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.982404,0.0055221603,0.0009621349,0.00045151287,0.0052053905,0.0054547573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009769662,0.00037121392,0.00057853875,0.0025696189,0.041680474,0.01757182,0.004242959,0.008080144,0.010414495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034990378,0.00056613865,0.0009646519,0.0059858286,0.032872546,0.0075055286,0.007811427,0.011214139,0.0003193089],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016363265,0.00024587137,0.058416348,0.0002489593,0.00010209915,0.001052528,0.18056881,0.0017239437,0.0004548788,0.57766074,0.11752556,0.061836712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000104258535,0.00013901795,0.18549494,0.0008128562,0.00011869976,0.00017414721,0.4251944,0.0010562467,0.00036230206,0.041942623,0.34436896,0.00023148941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9942669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99757725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7539454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2460546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3667589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87446976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155697493","doi":"","title":"Testing the Limits: Alcohol & Drug TestingFor Offshore Employees","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Drug; Alcohol; Business; Submarine pipeline; Pharmacology; Chemistry; Medicine; Engineering; Geotechnical engineering","score_opus":0.07072950114219628,"score_gpt":0.31607654620159054,"score_spread":0.24534704505939425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155697493","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6276083,0.0017068646,0.0012992846,0.2976766,0.00031742683,0.00024749804,0.00028907871,0.00010386918,0.070751116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9392132,0.0023346022,0.0017699482,0.029390017,0.00019269635,0.00015396389,0.00010763284,0.00003797345,0.026799852],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975932,0.00096289144,0.000081102495,0.00010166714,0.00037220898,0.0008888618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886335,0.0054587573,0.0011036157,0.0006058031,0.0011299849,0.0030683544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044153105,0.00035629218,0.000230603,0.00056071155,0.0098463455,0.002350115,0.001082611,0.0058380174,0.01805683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010997612,0.00051959377,0.00024141019,0.00079112704,0.0030575146,0.0037923728,0.0044584214,0.0047758003,0.0009218283],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035464647,0.0017001266,0.47448036,0.00018921938,0.000026023734,0.0122706285,0.034929782,0.0009237942,0.0013392728,0.024082668,0.214906,0.23479745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002908183,0.0011462704,0.41674635,0.0012548197,0.00012321469,0.0075782198,0.3725979,0.0058595506,0.0030640366,0.041705314,0.1493677,0.00026576963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18953346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45592886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18953346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056788805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026023628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3768605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172460546","doi":"","title":"A Proposed Transjudicial Approach to s. 15(2)Charter Adjudication","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Charter; Political science; International law; Law; Law and economics; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.019784451617929466,"score_gpt":0.2909947069325724,"score_spread":0.27121025531464293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3172460546","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03677035,0.00046069673,0.5583048,0.07059456,0.0025081313,0.0022637676,0.0004925652,0.0007243955,0.32788077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5483751,0.00022214252,0.3460269,0.021590108,0.0016019656,0.0022129493,0.00020890072,0.00014781945,0.07961416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.961141,0.016018799,0.0019229527,0.006566527,0.009715018,0.004635755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97593474,0.008807313,0.0010638231,0.0041136,0.008669966,0.0014106531],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034875687,0.0007371812,0.0008747931,0.004394312,0.012609515,0.019065747,0.0072452687,0.023788022,0.012118399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043594897,0.0012468101,0.0023665337,0.0026399135,0.011888302,0.007129579,0.0053987005,0.014312025,0.0024324732],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025364945,0.00008631869,0.00050145376,0.000022645712,0.00002116279,0.00021865459,0.001511926,0.0010691871,0.000450873,0.9712388,0.010557446,0.014296012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015167693,0.00016514634,0.0017812024,0.00023000152,0.00014456753,0.0005838486,0.0025228672,0.03463294,0.0020783178,0.87451994,0.082995735,0.0001938376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025416983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0541197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034875687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072015226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025220249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18444246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186913287","doi":"","title":"Lawyering at the Intersection of Public Law and LegalEthics: Government Lawyers as Custodians of the Ruleof Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Custodians; Law; Public law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Commercial law; Private law; Comparative law; Legal profession; Legal history; Intersection (aeronautics); Government (linguistics); Chinese law; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02737623722551455,"score_gpt":0.3189949639396431,"score_spread":0.2916187267141286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186913287","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24568121,0.0024678176,0.005155243,0.5566482,0.0006295873,0.00006334009,0.000024108505,0.000051380193,0.1892792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97261816,0.0007574265,0.0011670875,0.014954236,0.00015370784,0.00003416399,0.0000066513103,0.000023383382,0.010285128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9857928,0.008907343,0.00015332135,0.0009390956,0.0008891226,0.0033182364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9795232,0.011792181,0.0013824841,0.0006726538,0.001002299,0.0056270733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014971523,0.0002734812,0.00063270255,0.001442749,0.039990854,0.033392802,0.0019106452,0.016949853,0.01845721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026615817,0.000902899,0.0004352825,0.0015076682,0.056756917,0.024659334,0.015285676,0.022164479,0.0008566868],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004507708,0.00028884207,0.004041252,0.00003143432,0.0000093954295,0.00091741845,0.17479317,0.00024090236,0.0002341296,0.7834856,0.019458976,0.016453695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010621781,0.00006589323,0.0049183853,0.0003119942,0.00003810067,0.00049681816,0.38441458,0.0013287513,0.00043925492,0.48818216,0.11961951,0.000078371435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.062190738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13583742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062190738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01731823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.054117855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12565315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3190073198","doi":"","title":"\"No Sinecure\": William Young as Attorney Generalof Nova Scotia, 1854-1857","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Law; Nova (rocket); Political science; Criminology; Psychology; History; Archaeology; Engineering","score_opus":0.026763995328733,"score_gpt":0.24596688545276837,"score_spread":0.21920289012403538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3190073198","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63037056,0.033144142,0.0006258852,0.12077415,0.004524447,0.00022115311,0.0014429825,0.000057718582,0.20883895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5414469,0.0065155895,0.0003133715,0.013109077,0.00028878593,0.000052347164,0.0002139195,0.000039636332,0.43802035],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830365,0.00020932693,0.000059799437,0.00016773709,0.00031918118,0.00094031484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986308,0.00022610652,0.00014947978,0.000044442964,0.00040536368,0.00054367667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001931382,0.00031381624,0.00028534923,0.001079173,0.017841266,0.0042044953,0.0010616244,0.0032545526,0.005911506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041923085,0.00062001176,0.00018471216,0.001464062,0.0035947468,0.0019227874,0.0034178395,0.003457921,0.0006148073],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022604351,0.00010897213,0.08675507,0.0003726767,0.000038261795,0.0061570085,0.25945342,0.00030884845,0.002101706,0.118231334,0.4260486,0.10019812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008311469,0.000042440246,0.10917601,0.000318813,0.000018973684,0.0006416521,0.04686675,0.00006436951,0.0005666981,0.0017084144,0.8405295,0.000058075362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.921666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.990216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078333974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041662116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.054289997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3022812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W320511781","doi":"","title":"The Tabling of International Treaties in the Parliament of Canada: The First Four Years","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; House of Commons; Parliament; Political science; Humanities; Law; International law; Politics; Art","score_opus":0.01968066658716691,"score_gpt":0.26397860396516215,"score_spread":0.24429793737799524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W320511781","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056278963,0.0657419,0.003833427,0.08179181,0.0049066017,0.00036809797,0.002572586,0.00033886818,0.7841678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5337459,0.022301449,0.0029271524,0.025498923,0.00074980524,0.00021487034,0.0015083029,0.00029380247,0.41275978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98101324,0.0012185797,0.00035056475,0.0011888697,0.0089989295,0.0072296956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950702,0.0008440681,0.00034637845,0.00024761137,0.0024629289,0.001028855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048927483,0.0007570116,0.000673851,0.0044944887,0.026985617,0.019103358,0.0021906684,0.0039715227,0.00872901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012933176,0.0007532591,0.00066123065,0.010937648,0.01247997,0.003213553,0.003730276,0.0078132525,0.00089210545],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008087026,0.000043489817,0.002801843,0.00035474426,0.000029116349,0.0003319469,0.01927913,0.0008730574,0.00054009666,0.69765085,0.204418,0.07359691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007329824,0.000011183343,0.0074261664,0.00025579732,0.000011778127,0.00003507842,0.0042520356,0.00014540393,0.0002912637,0.0036851438,0.98383176,0.000047129455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99038494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9928342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28853276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.28853276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31126964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82520115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213356300","doi":"","title":"Fallow Fields Initiatives and Canada's East Coast Offshore:Policy and Legal Considerations","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Marine and Offshore Engineering Studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Submarine pipeline; East coast; Political science; Geography; Oceanography; Geology; Physical geography","score_opus":0.007391419750911703,"score_gpt":0.21095798779265398,"score_spread":0.20356656804174228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213356300","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27614453,0.0051483605,0.0007347185,0.27694687,0.0003834921,0.0001933035,0.0009828048,0.00009365678,0.43937227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8182305,0.0028852196,0.0009702517,0.07280036,0.00013232943,0.00010613457,0.00021365637,0.000050030485,0.104611404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99050784,0.000597691,0.00019842286,0.00050780654,0.0024931575,0.005695063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9777905,0.0086066555,0.0011978612,0.00046244203,0.005975727,0.005966832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050938097,0.00048789268,0.0006701649,0.0029831864,0.028522706,0.016992103,0.0040776655,0.014422942,0.019519836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016520621,0.00087085855,0.00092969794,0.0033906875,0.010100656,0.0046336707,0.005531019,0.0086268,0.00041807807],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037438102,0.0002608543,0.048733003,0.0005175339,0.00011615726,0.0018115981,0.017553672,0.0020089964,0.0009906368,0.7472598,0.14284293,0.037530422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005563409,0.00029917696,0.15696399,0.0038622795,0.00057026953,0.00051895983,0.14991792,0.0033860642,0.0026032128,0.06620983,0.61451304,0.0005989202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99340665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99818915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13057947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13057947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32764223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9474248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W330011836","doi":"","title":"The EU as an Arctic Power: Analysis of the Competence of the EU in the Arctic by Policy Areas","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arctic; Political science; The arctic; European union; Indigenous; Circumpolar star; Member states; Business; International trade; Oceanography; Ecology","score_opus":0.015715572722268097,"score_gpt":0.3125096319193878,"score_spread":0.2967940591971197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W330011836","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35451615,0.0046487306,0.0033667812,0.012527138,0.00016755704,0.000101877384,0.00020378809,0.000013181554,0.62445486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98311734,0.0024836906,0.001033783,0.0013344405,0.000052268108,0.00006293804,0.00013345054,0.000021622596,0.01176046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903114,0.00459732,0.0003821997,0.0004744802,0.0018127712,0.0024219812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894236,0.0064329216,0.00089765305,0.00023039691,0.0016861352,0.0013292154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011721903,0.00027282228,0.00037940318,0.0032119807,0.003909487,0.011511736,0.0008194868,0.0016024375,0.0059932554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016944451,0.00013997802,0.00054254686,0.004828248,0.0046856347,0.006574998,0.0054121595,0.0016409446,0.00031724857],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007992586,0.000061074985,0.017115187,0.00018201619,0.00004426741,0.0004193057,0.018318936,0.0015695051,0.00020349902,0.9346956,0.0028177055,0.024493009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000474013,0.00016175286,0.12683265,0.0025912425,0.00012634731,0.0003733322,0.2945196,0.0031626667,0.00074392906,0.16815764,0.40320846,0.00007490165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030523127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032577578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030523127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008436543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011532774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06199211},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W337012207","doi":"","title":"\"The harshness and injustice of the common law rule...has frequenly been commented upon\": DebatingContributory Negligence in Canada, 1914-1949","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Legislation; Political science; Plaintiff; Common law; Statute; Injustice; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01586883990437358,"score_gpt":0.2562552275807659,"score_spread":0.24038638767639234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W337012207","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5963729,0.02650022,0.0013304884,0.087745376,0.0009499962,0.00012272771,0.0009221668,0.00008352742,0.28597257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9028471,0.008560939,0.00048077363,0.008071267,0.00011391969,0.000016481059,0.000119162156,0.000034474153,0.07975594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997216,0.0002607238,0.00006666778,0.0002594813,0.0011684129,0.0010286246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975908,0.0006678544,0.00023605234,0.0000751285,0.0010900792,0.0003401764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020831898,0.00033712343,0.0002516948,0.0021912272,0.027860576,0.0043431264,0.0013763543,0.0023446945,0.0028362845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006613707,0.0003059851,0.0002509455,0.0033956247,0.0133840125,0.001364952,0.001900409,0.0032236301,0.00019695052],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014562487,0.000105797146,0.075309135,0.000311692,0.000061718696,0.004033637,0.29911444,0.0011492493,0.0019691936,0.3547501,0.1412742,0.121775225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021225902,0.00006471537,0.19161145,0.0004671654,0.00007423058,0.0006804442,0.087490164,0.00043535323,0.001694359,0.008142977,0.7091589,0.00015899279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.996181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88082266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11917734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.124082334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86469615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W338868633","doi":"","title":"Hugh Kindred and the Teaching of International Law in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Casebook; International law; Law; Jurisprudence; Scholarship; Political science; Sociology; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011404476398589103,"score_gpt":0.26646690920813165,"score_spread":0.25506243280954255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W338868633","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011457584,0.08430685,0.0015678854,0.093065746,0.010261236,0.000110248206,0.00041322559,0.0002703825,0.7985468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15470721,0.06540126,0.002646648,0.014215351,0.0010722744,0.000080461854,0.00028612683,0.0002657335,0.7613249],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968804,0.00027084266,0.000049718747,0.00020915172,0.0017628322,0.0008271259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99757665,0.00035585818,0.000095475516,0.00005459037,0.0011598003,0.00075753825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009558389,0.000513062,0.00043096443,0.0020058402,0.019190941,0.009646454,0.001130975,0.002215252,0.015119604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038248762,0.00047623616,0.00029030585,0.0050141653,0.0074509643,0.0022406965,0.002144405,0.0034242854,0.0019400229],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014745215,0.000023658708,0.0007060344,0.0001255547,0.00000406758,0.00030699783,0.013448399,0.00029528703,0.00020002904,0.20673995,0.72188073,0.056254566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019652216,0.0000036622466,0.0009375799,0.00012194452,0.0000026892023,0.000059486865,0.0040758005,0.00009847474,0.000041530267,0.003252744,0.9913898,0.000014396425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97822434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98842245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09986111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09986111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15498973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72454643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W341238104","doi":"","title":"Law's Treatment of Science: From Idealization to Understanding","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Scientific evidence; Political science; Consistency (knowledge bases); Law; Humanities; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.07659995695760385,"score_gpt":0.35944422057783837,"score_spread":0.2828442636202345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W341238104","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010846206,0.0245384,0.17696695,0.46499607,0.0037105926,0.00017222895,0.0001361358,0.00018821565,0.31844527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8599275,0.01423785,0.053753406,0.04739367,0.007555686,0.000997475,0.00014780932,0.00025726165,0.015729338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.92638427,0.05241226,0.0023943342,0.0033521953,0.012830452,0.0026265979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95294696,0.03617918,0.002519828,0.004020626,0.0034375875,0.0008958726],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05577126,0.0012730398,0.0018475965,0.0067304093,0.010092078,0.027692437,0.0059488076,0.014288514,0.0022443132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05690611,0.0009769143,0.0020087613,0.003443827,0.1573651,0.02725932,0.010093369,0.021581048,0.00068053487],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012718481,0.0000024797184,0.000018057506,0.00001075763,0.0000012663967,0.000008338323,0.00058311893,0.0000844399,0.000009206948,0.9983138,0.0004290335,0.0005382553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050357826,0.00000444583,0.000025635201,0.000062556646,0.0000017306575,0.000012067018,0.00035767484,0.00027449796,0.000023850764,0.98968774,0.009539996,0.0000046943933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007980539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036779218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9899079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015931625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021319345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29495013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7056734645","doi":"","title":"Gender According to World Athletics: The Regulation of Racialized Athletes from the Global South","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Magnetic confinement fusion research","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Athletes; Privilege (computing); Power (physics); Civilization; Gender relations; Global South","score_opus":0.023731288851022807,"score_gpt":0.2878220616891836,"score_spread":0.2640907728381608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7056734645","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4920168,0.011729884,0.0046213022,0.07675636,0.0016867853,0.00008320343,0.00013714252,0.000065353786,0.4129031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9621347,0.002756655,0.000845142,0.009933545,0.00032758512,0.000064116735,0.00004398743,0.00005438399,0.023839919],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99603313,0.0017303969,0.00012211311,0.0005817186,0.000935421,0.00059724716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980598,0.00050022674,0.00044947455,0.00012310223,0.0003866839,0.00048062517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004085349,0.00021484593,0.00018592877,0.0010536159,0.004940943,0.0037339884,0.0005399933,0.00084134826,0.0033786525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039195977,0.00022488287,0.00026038967,0.0008050953,0.009449104,0.0013908036,0.005106803,0.0015843547,0.000317088],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012226072,0.00007737052,0.08619987,0.00021391593,0.000040075265,0.00079605717,0.41431004,0.00018129662,0.005755883,0.3494066,0.020342655,0.122554034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001857753,0.00016087752,0.1878686,0.0009480682,0.000055250457,0.0007994525,0.17710587,0.00033636275,0.0022400192,0.045606792,0.5847752,0.00008489146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027178522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0412039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027178522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002459744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031563696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05404067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W751532157","doi":"","title":"Slipping between Danger, Pleasure and the Law: Thoughts on Three Recent Books Addressing Sexuality","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human sexuality; Sociology; Pleasure; Feminist legal theory; Supreme court; Law; Oppression; Jurisprudence; Gender studies; Feminism; Political science; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.060149122344419874,"score_gpt":0.31815164927915457,"score_spread":0.2580025269347347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W751532157","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001340177,0.86697686,0.00051790656,0.04893806,0.012569704,0.000040088576,0.0001267398,0.00003616986,0.06945431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016262474,0.7247841,0.0014146605,0.04399802,0.013443969,0.00017341686,0.00039830513,0.00017130318,0.19935383],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865484,0.00034995266,0.00007007942,0.00014076279,0.00061086396,0.00017340972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982151,0.0010897112,0.00014894622,0.00004521278,0.00032176156,0.00017929457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011013462,0.0010109614,0.001068629,0.0041154586,0.0033067788,0.01006468,0.0014520634,0.0040688002,0.020279905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030947574,0.0005761278,0.00090824993,0.007429019,0.0060295803,0.01015129,0.0028927126,0.005429688,0.0050398065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003453421,0.000044513385,0.00029249288,0.0016533502,0.000020961344,0.00034983654,0.012835294,0.000094654824,0.00028133433,0.05655974,0.83418137,0.09365193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034653976,0.000008718634,0.00037725826,0.0013178247,0.0000062032314,0.00022206546,0.003940813,0.00001253625,0.000033294527,0.0032867666,0.99077904,0.000011923041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00831577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016669972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020279905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003999993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00408852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06784308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W772136316","doi":"","title":"The Structure of Dialogue: Exploring Habermas' Discourse Theory to Explain the \"Magic\" and Potential of Restorative Justice Processes","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Communicative action; Humanities; Epistemology; Restorative justice; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020523470652013275,"score_gpt":0.28093022178596144,"score_spread":0.2604067511339482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W772136316","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21964811,0.028175365,0.24784344,0.104679726,0.0015670881,0.0005853095,0.00019703452,0.0003916984,0.39691222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9745806,0.0019475861,0.014874252,0.0013361847,0.00017455185,0.00024090888,0.000040678584,0.0000720253,0.0067332746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9771294,0.01948641,0.00039713734,0.0010056868,0.0012161144,0.0007653117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812397,0.015571358,0.0011213039,0.0007143028,0.00076253683,0.00059086084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015974982,0.00079892174,0.0008643648,0.0044469186,0.013477079,0.013732391,0.003148744,0.006050412,0.003746111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021227777,0.00062952546,0.00093420886,0.0028229537,0.0545572,0.028567035,0.012334207,0.007260812,0.000596037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019422301,0.000016973843,0.00019219921,0.000086824344,0.000005153249,0.000164794,0.19116893,0.00024878688,0.00018963404,0.80309904,0.0006423275,0.0041659535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005901634,0.000065571294,0.000473252,0.0006307584,0.000020725041,0.00032665743,0.15295146,0.003846995,0.00070742966,0.71973294,0.12113488,0.00005036577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005382004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036296921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015974982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012377615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056443224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08980632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W786547374","doi":"","title":"Common Resource or Private Right: Contested Claims to Seaweed in 19th Century Prince Edward Island","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"American Environmental and Regional History","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cove; Shore; Quarter (Canadian coin); Law; Archaeology; Geography; Fishery; History; Oceanography; Political science; Geology","score_opus":0.006315527656006739,"score_gpt":0.20729199863452852,"score_spread":0.20097647097852178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W786547374","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.489482,0.0045629474,0.00032513772,0.062458187,0.0004769046,0.000032088305,0.0000718527,0.000014535664,0.4425764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86302364,0.0019532335,0.0001249188,0.014084174,0.00013562667,0.00002323443,0.000025423078,0.000025436102,0.120604396],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983375,0.00031281685,0.00006048267,0.00020180627,0.00022897958,0.00085846346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975688,0.0008520227,0.00018153123,0.00018669516,0.00042675776,0.00078410987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002027611,0.00023010487,0.00030312827,0.0006666273,0.02208422,0.0067142863,0.0012082884,0.0049094455,0.008919638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031296157,0.00032360211,0.00015539197,0.0005597675,0.025342051,0.004103258,0.006338954,0.0087111285,0.00069203996],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041159037,0.00004114659,0.004978378,0.000043320055,0.000010142991,0.0059175654,0.6518281,0.00005160457,0.00047882137,0.2992992,0.029441414,0.0078691365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010213548,0.000024435343,0.009170013,0.00038249127,0.000010511245,0.0012365009,0.5062301,0.00008000412,0.00028768915,0.014327755,0.4681751,0.00006512556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44330916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6274645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5566908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014302019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008556631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8814576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W789726164","doi":"","title":"Environmental Goals and Sustainable Prosperity Act","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prosperity; Government (linguistics); Environmental law; Political science; Context (archaeology); Accountability; Corporate governance; Public administration; Environmental studies; Legislature; Civil society; Sustainable development; Law; Sociology; Management; Economics; Geography; Politics","score_opus":0.007567722227402739,"score_gpt":0.2424458437110027,"score_spread":0.23487812148359996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W789726164","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011756732,0.031232996,0.0020048916,0.120617844,0.018963179,0.000706438,0.02744231,0.00043714856,0.7868386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18579277,0.027926061,0.007720612,0.11330286,0.0015823005,0.0014307951,0.033922423,0.00027527008,0.62804693],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99543166,0.00036460138,0.0001910586,0.00020966,0.0029655683,0.0008374435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99470335,0.0006627855,0.00030660527,0.00033139446,0.0033976503,0.0005982491],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024644965,0.00044535255,0.00046872176,0.0013290239,0.0025527414,0.003348636,0.0011459112,0.0028907107,0.0059322813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008080812,0.0003692855,0.0003720242,0.0017338161,0.0013467752,0.000816605,0.0015533017,0.0040195067,0.0033216653],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047730155,0.000022993772,0.0021238788,0.00029435652,0.000015875836,0.000160658,0.00048763197,0.00026489975,0.00025674107,0.056362696,0.91237336,0.027589161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012482606,0.000010412642,0.011128501,0.00041792294,0.000013858264,0.00002991698,0.00019618921,0.00007619596,0.00013146912,0.001463014,0.9865035,0.000016576554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7008586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81234837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2991414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014534698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06514938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60180616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W793228858","doi":"","title":"Will the Rotterdam Rules Be Accepted? A Liner Cargo Interest Perspective","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Liability; Convention; Welfare economics; Business; Law; Humanities; Art; Economics","score_opus":0.049441908670284855,"score_gpt":0.2745321735469091,"score_spread":0.22509026487662426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W793228858","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016328964,0.01545677,0.008689116,0.30134428,0.0028996775,0.00008329829,0.00025831693,0.000061612795,0.654878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.537583,0.021591034,0.008592628,0.14668414,0.0055370955,0.00035660088,0.0002942627,0.00036764072,0.2789936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9739939,0.007957515,0.0012732022,0.004832384,0.0073789163,0.004564007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98511654,0.006436085,0.0015566112,0.0010729478,0.004885932,0.0009319137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017033162,0.0008400869,0.0009410012,0.0015998961,0.01063293,0.029457016,0.005209103,0.0159427,0.013068264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029786745,0.0008207111,0.0011297362,0.0025185056,0.022167882,0.01771195,0.005439842,0.019084657,0.0031098183],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072125595,0.000008323263,0.000156489,0.000028193615,0.0000033918707,0.00015867403,0.002381548,0.000112906506,0.000038427694,0.98117346,0.012060434,0.003870965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026504025,0.000038976046,0.0010079293,0.00062311976,0.000016548036,0.00019470172,0.0064721056,0.00039075888,0.00027165626,0.21013705,0.7807446,0.00007601143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34610182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17134276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34610182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029997138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025608798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6881746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W812575852","doi":"","title":"The Land Tenure System in the Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Regulatory Regime: Review, Analysis and Current Issues","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Political science; Geography; Environmental protection; Humanities; Law","score_opus":0.01453286674212879,"score_gpt":0.3035591572751077,"score_spread":0.2890262905329789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W812575852","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025490108,0.9913675,0.00006695419,0.002216139,0.00021780265,0.0000101747455,0.00015506818,0.0000030078872,0.0034143105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01726109,0.980272,0.00015921415,0.0007908107,0.00020672295,0.00001339329,0.0002015108,0.0000023885357,0.001092785],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855465,0.0002556202,0.00025761692,0.00016201369,0.0005256533,0.0002444925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911034,0.003765328,0.002046018,0.00012790442,0.00267474,0.0002826429],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028667348,0.00029540402,0.00069271633,0.0058290605,0.0009403326,0.0031191795,0.0010342697,0.0009249578,0.0018524703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004832166,0.0002698077,0.000504211,0.0130226165,0.0023660732,0.0016175328,0.0005979831,0.00094005355,0.00028055208],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011958019,0.00007244809,0.0154648535,0.031706948,0.00017085332,0.00061680767,0.0017390945,0.0006640677,0.00033771966,0.01428015,0.06948344,0.86534405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009939524,0.000089628644,0.08774514,0.034721065,0.00024813646,0.0009138029,0.0034520256,0.00012827084,0.00021459455,0.00060812256,0.8718223,0.000046968613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5157211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6873307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48427892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018575912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03222171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9742619},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W828063601","doi":"","title":"Feeling Relational: The Use of Buddhist Meditation in Restorative Practices","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meditation; Restorative justice; Buddhism; Humanities; Emptiness; Economic Justice; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; Ethnology; Psychology; Law; Criminology; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.13634336597522256,"score_gpt":0.35804567402626086,"score_spread":0.2217023080510383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W828063601","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55053,0.022179069,0.02716751,0.026601002,0.0007984548,0.00010082625,0.000074730306,0.00015354532,0.3723949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926529,0.0016637833,0.001986027,0.00074500556,0.00006491117,0.000025278301,0.000010975394,0.00003180024,0.002819247],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965609,0.0025119744,0.000067551664,0.0002929197,0.00031680963,0.00024974524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972224,0.0018419966,0.00032216095,0.00028481567,0.000108037464,0.00022056085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003531927,0.0003821181,0.00029004746,0.00085386506,0.0055604433,0.006079882,0.001069646,0.0016390996,0.0028659264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006261758,0.00035912532,0.00034037972,0.0008614681,0.025826437,0.005328168,0.008019622,0.0037908275,0.00023380344],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005905569,0.000052729087,0.0013509772,0.00021901146,0.000026204456,0.0002984836,0.76391697,0.00007915392,0.0012174333,0.21021914,0.0011435543,0.021417275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007354044,0.00024870713,0.019496776,0.0012475855,0.00017565368,0.0020000709,0.6133774,0.0007719974,0.0026399228,0.11634216,0.24354592,0.00008030952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038019342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052845115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006079882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028605545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010534197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020754933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W844255714","doi":"","title":"Confidential Information and Governments: Balancing the Public's Right to Access Government Records and an Oil and Gas Company's Right to Protect Its Confidential Information","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Business; Legislation; Government (linguistics); Freedom of information; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.009175805422242464,"score_gpt":0.2276828582247249,"score_spread":0.21850705280248242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W844255714","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016031472,0.024432478,0.006960128,0.1359701,0.0011555881,0.00009764918,0.00028150668,0.000083594525,0.8149875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7436506,0.029323667,0.0057495586,0.0339364,0.0032203554,0.00028860333,0.00033222395,0.00009071893,0.18340786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9799298,0.0053342595,0.00061950827,0.001657743,0.008329605,0.0041290997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854543,0.008570977,0.0013162189,0.0016337767,0.0020379233,0.0009867308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011917138,0.0005315254,0.0005444535,0.001645506,0.006485126,0.024263,0.0022570407,0.015156806,0.026265532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021212464,0.00060723495,0.0005835974,0.0032896884,0.02668236,0.015388928,0.008174399,0.007702102,0.0029594165],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001640084,0.000010980195,0.00017412621,0.000066126544,0.0000025277748,0.00004870697,0.0008506122,0.00011043611,0.000078268815,0.9773356,0.01083301,0.010473246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027049471,0.00005780898,0.0018474754,0.0016662932,0.00003238602,0.00028815313,0.003793891,0.00041503154,0.0007488714,0.48686755,0.5041954,0.000060071652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03758404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047317047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03758404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01764291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027262595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12800884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W849994986","doi":"","title":"Developments. in Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Royalties:From Hibernia to Hebron and Back","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Marine and Offshore Engineering Studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"White paper; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.00513320832992007,"score_gpt":0.18747355374752708,"score_spread":0.18234034541760702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W849994986","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53090566,0.010742294,0.0017375589,0.009136727,0.0003165833,0.00006404505,0.0007775299,0.00011754326,0.44620207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7120695,0.0037485114,0.0018929329,0.002072673,0.00004741826,0.000037790716,0.00031108822,0.00005317734,0.27976683],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989975,0.00010401866,0.00004009294,0.0001730279,0.00019718727,0.00048809397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990324,0.00016480933,0.00026569914,0.00008309356,0.00023582243,0.00021822867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094330637,0.00019634826,0.00012294427,0.0009187278,0.003747704,0.0039564706,0.0006593648,0.00069056253,0.0049942643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014817289,0.00028030341,0.00022954916,0.0012172421,0.003578923,0.001218509,0.0023071745,0.0012583626,0.00050026074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005307507,0.00014184763,0.09259461,0.00064360694,0.000085319254,0.0063080885,0.053921584,0.003816336,0.008948459,0.33055025,0.055914693,0.4465444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012219895,0.000081931226,0.1656887,0.0002628326,0.000015822665,0.0003314113,0.008736132,0.000162446,0.0010822811,0.0011032893,0.8224839,0.000039008944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7808093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9021117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21919072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027814405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02020348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4409631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W858437278","doi":"","title":"From Idea to Practice: Sustainable Development Efforts in Manitoba","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainable development; Political science; Legislation; Nova scotia; Humanities; Earth Summit; Round table; Ethnology; Sociology; Business; Law; Session (web analytics); Art","score_opus":0.011147818676403652,"score_gpt":0.27278820749117244,"score_spread":0.2616403888147688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W858437278","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81361514,0.01490156,0.0047798725,0.042643093,0.00036543346,0.0009172892,0.00010963797,0.00013390329,0.122534044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9447304,0.00680884,0.0064010397,0.002722544,0.000020869986,0.00041836224,0.000067413486,0.0000640733,0.038766447],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99400055,0.0036064293,0.00019536784,0.000360929,0.0007505774,0.0010861318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99232626,0.0038781543,0.000401889,0.0004497678,0.0014545424,0.0014893886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009373744,0.0004907842,0.00037691352,0.0030868878,0.025816722,0.009029124,0.002691243,0.0019053573,0.0038709717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008594403,0.0007804378,0.0003205185,0.0055549587,0.015325873,0.0028701895,0.01055478,0.002174728,0.0004125255],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003098211,0.00011319596,0.015831647,0.0005253512,0.000021854234,0.0023670525,0.8921739,0.0002795371,0.0019037233,0.029813059,0.004283884,0.052655865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008183152,0.000048694295,0.016066205,0.00081309665,0.000019293704,0.00019183921,0.8752588,0.0001839922,0.0005838211,0.0020063072,0.10479185,0.00002792281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6788885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87943345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3211115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.068261206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13121225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64600515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W862080893","doi":"","title":"Costs Immunity: Banishing the \"Bane\" of Costs from Public Interest Litigation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public interest; Humanities; Political science; Public order; Welfare economics; Sociology; Law; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0461253407968256,"score_gpt":0.2948359846570084,"score_spread":0.2487106438601828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W862080893","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17486744,0.0016003621,0.018119821,0.019943725,0.00046909074,0.0005557335,0.00011580443,0.00034565764,0.7839825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94921654,0.0007026071,0.0053703403,0.007639019,0.000200009,0.00011865601,0.000054126253,0.000056161276,0.03664256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98466253,0.002080666,0.00049942796,0.00080456556,0.008756437,0.0031963848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98488337,0.0074413787,0.0015296146,0.0017671316,0.0030395065,0.0013390362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046219174,0.0004655762,0.00041241208,0.0015477343,0.003422678,0.008428518,0.0016441826,0.0042517255,0.008298765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03266545,0.00031210837,0.00049084687,0.0007774386,0.0115022,0.004508943,0.004935371,0.004475169,0.0009980885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017342113,0.0002676224,0.007145574,0.00019263898,0.000023391722,0.00046517773,0.0031008185,0.0012805951,0.0034709955,0.8643215,0.017609254,0.10194903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071713375,0.0013652049,0.07388834,0.0012089983,0.00046848762,0.001739618,0.011041716,0.012309134,0.02280042,0.3276228,0.5464717,0.00036647313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14294618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23515405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14294618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010821035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028930165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28422827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W881314250","doi":"","title":"Getting Past the Gatekeepers: The Reception of Restorative Justice in the Nova Scotian Criminal Justice System","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Criminal justice; Nova scotia; Criminology; Economic Justice; Political science; Theory of criminal justice; Sociology; Law; Ethnology","score_opus":0.039525560698045144,"score_gpt":0.31435203628153563,"score_spread":0.2748264755834905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W881314250","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97410893,0.000740331,0.00017924754,0.0042928793,0.00007405866,0.000021672568,0.00008474494,0.000008423895,0.020489786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954201,0.00026244362,0.000085180785,0.0002166024,0.000009858464,0.000007353943,0.000018607669,0.000004715932,0.0039751083],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985268,0.00048300123,0.00003906429,0.00011571253,0.00019071059,0.0006447713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971347,0.0006976317,0.00063769915,0.000103024395,0.00047869392,0.00094819826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010257497,0.0001787191,0.00019381987,0.0010176091,0.009433584,0.004363803,0.0007729414,0.00068712776,0.0033169598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052007735,0.00019033364,0.00012377427,0.001204271,0.005879773,0.0012329674,0.005208355,0.0011116221,0.00023669326],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023674872,0.00004850308,0.15661532,0.0002311652,0.000024158868,0.0040273694,0.7610578,0.00043727984,0.002531047,0.011748728,0.00425066,0.058791254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060733596,0.000079576384,0.4813888,0.00026834526,0.000010885731,0.00031681673,0.48331487,0.0001660005,0.00027641788,0.00083310244,0.033288512,0.00005052643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7924006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9242193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2075994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020827388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017736822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41764396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W900759554","doi":"","title":"OSCOLA: The Oxford University Standard for Citation of Legal Authorities","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Legal citation; Legal writing; Law; Style (visual arts); Legal research; Hegemony; Consistency (knowledge bases); Political science; Sociology; Black letter law; Art; Literature; Computer science; Comparative law","score_opus":0.03368112788637235,"score_gpt":0.30446958736270824,"score_spread":0.2707884594763359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W900759554","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002843922,0.2012314,0.1051824,0.06818237,0.07149423,0.0035708519,0.15071744,0.0322624,0.364515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.033182766,0.20529059,0.15003368,0.02013157,0.017183771,0.013194225,0.19351408,0.020030113,0.3474392],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9553707,0.008946526,0.014549785,0.0018783321,0.017629098,0.0016255376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92834765,0.020493079,0.009663087,0.009780014,0.0281234,0.003592795],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024871835,0.0021373476,0.0025776448,0.02941153,0.0026306817,0.022989148,0.0061731236,0.0055152653,0.103610724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.096597806,0.002268633,0.0015170071,0.029809114,0.0044193473,0.019405352,0.007939492,0.006359291,0.10564474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004322595,0.000018313933,0.00019927393,0.0018133216,0.000010113306,0.000039126364,0.0005448062,0.00012948526,0.00012447395,0.028723197,0.8939808,0.07437397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010883834,0.0000081587705,0.00043306962,0.0016024655,0.0000049148316,0.00005305301,0.00018704157,0.0000646637,0.00008779881,0.0049157743,0.9926044,0.000027639273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01612464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013328027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97701085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00937991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023908563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3466124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W904336888","doi":"","title":"Reply to Edmond & Roach and Susan Haack's Replies to Law's Treatment of Science: From Idealization to Understanding","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Idealization; Subject (documents); Law; Psychology; Scientific evidence; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Political science; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.06431148602138019,"score_gpt":0.3498896242850279,"score_spread":0.2855781382636477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W904336888","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015185193,0.000992518,0.00011611356,0.98520076,0.012422271,0.00000846254,0.000016452896,0.000014520515,0.0010770605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002938514,0.0006237674,0.00019180441,0.98295605,0.0092058135,0.000038547103,0.000011663403,0.00003715682,0.003996712],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98162717,0.008495711,0.0019007345,0.0023810673,0.0041495985,0.0014456253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9532894,0.03154861,0.0022576065,0.001319475,0.00912621,0.002458794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016069623,0.001230564,0.0020051731,0.0016165097,0.0092399465,0.0068681613,0.0052587613,0.06389159,0.009140205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10963701,0.0014937381,0.0017802056,0.0015183801,0.01156325,0.009385561,0.00451819,0.06819532,0.0054017403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013431469,0.000006524597,0.00008406999,0.000036038826,0.000005377772,0.00019162626,0.00092125626,0.000021905986,0.000046343008,0.006326472,0.9905687,0.0017781473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030504501,0.00003651837,0.00067515677,0.00078748935,0.000021718904,0.0011002104,0.00506041,0.0002267143,0.00034091706,0.012464735,0.9791109,0.00014491267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013520347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010204676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06389159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011002726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009406047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.084985316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W919743085","doi":"","title":"Restorative Justice: Reflections on Theory and Practice from within the Nova Scotia Community University Research Alliance","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Alliance; Conceptualization; Sociology; Nova scotia; Economic Justice; Political science; Psychology; Law; Criminology","score_opus":0.21776419128824523,"score_gpt":0.47940503212936186,"score_spread":0.2616408408411166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W919743085","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19563931,0.02984419,0.003325553,0.6073678,0.0046350197,0.0003643101,0.00007166703,0.00008757896,0.15866452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88962203,0.011208806,0.0028915624,0.054298606,0.00057819806,0.00034261317,0.00004526107,0.00015453922,0.0408584],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95765156,0.028347626,0.0008870026,0.001491662,0.0035380528,0.008084046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91954136,0.055667505,0.0017044357,0.002196696,0.005588891,0.015301131],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04317196,0.00058882986,0.0008944422,0.003088918,0.082773775,0.039662864,0.005699078,0.013491048,0.0040538777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036442526,0.0010731105,0.00074873155,0.004915224,0.06496469,0.010798428,0.026561465,0.016547456,0.0004943105],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021584514,0.00006316868,0.0010060114,0.00013062319,0.000006236422,0.0015464216,0.89916974,0.00007614868,0.00019601797,0.06651637,0.019724991,0.011542797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007083176,0.000017861288,0.001861696,0.00059239165,0.0000040789078,0.00012967372,0.8663379,0.000062102416,0.00007482128,0.004997523,0.12588413,0.000030669482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6394497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8046025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36055028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08987043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16034117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7253473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W923940955","doi":"","title":"The Continuum of International Maritime Law and Canadian Maritime Law: Explaining a Complex Relationship","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; International law; Comity; Law; Relation (database); Jurisprudence; Humanities; Jurisdiction; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0179711172558237,"score_gpt":0.2460886986303178,"score_spread":0.2281175813744941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W923940955","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13309471,0.0041152965,0.004088705,0.028826522,0.000106368796,0.00006816393,0.00024128905,0.000056165536,0.8294028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98053586,0.0017895616,0.001567295,0.0013606311,0.000034849923,0.000033677094,0.00008949599,0.000024481127,0.0145641435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969812,0.00037320438,0.00005093907,0.0002846849,0.0012696558,0.0010402774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99662554,0.0011300166,0.0004012679,0.00012345024,0.0010603049,0.0006595007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001549216,0.0003748133,0.00038539746,0.007288311,0.01628956,0.0131141795,0.0020719268,0.002220804,0.011028893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067278375,0.00034166535,0.00041991784,0.009805695,0.029885918,0.005025855,0.005382239,0.0030686464,0.00037768434],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047773924,0.000010303464,0.0043049897,0.000020612675,0.0000026171062,0.00008857885,0.0063769505,0.00023866892,0.000048847443,0.9809332,0.0021353825,0.0058352035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050137496,0.000026306032,0.07679693,0.00071182934,0.000057270943,0.00035079342,0.0899403,0.004675342,0.00021098631,0.51702756,0.31003648,0.00011599972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9652231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9723893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11596647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11596647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.068744816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84139955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W936839938","doi":"","title":"The Effects of Regulated Discretion on Police Referrals to Restorative Justice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Nova scotia; Discretion; Political science; Legislation; Economic Justice; Context (archaeology); Criminal justice; Humanities; Criminology; Law; Sociology; Ethnology; Geography; Art","score_opus":0.018055785241220788,"score_gpt":0.31665551014177823,"score_spread":0.2985997249005574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W936839938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9897954,0.00025735132,0.00021494245,0.0012204151,0.000017016966,0.00005449772,0.000042089367,0.0000071380405,0.008391175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99880207,0.000078327874,0.00008670428,0.00020018994,0.000010644055,0.000024331792,0.0000137293155,0.0000027199253,0.0007812738],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.965397,0.022602972,0.0011209991,0.0019510101,0.0052631446,0.0036647834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8627046,0.07563937,0.03845069,0.007094234,0.008192475,0.007918723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008908255,0.00023183292,0.0002718937,0.0009018411,0.0030556007,0.0027356734,0.0011168502,0.0010038333,0.0030005504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07187235,0.00033852522,0.00035939246,0.0009392926,0.0041025234,0.00079776044,0.0027553441,0.0015082562,0.00027260077],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026649882,0.0015188345,0.82124656,0.00026507655,0.00028303658,0.0012168824,0.06515046,0.002959277,0.004772632,0.008011775,0.0025523945,0.089358255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008155799,0.00046444056,0.9821988,0.00015444949,0.000037521022,0.00007318806,0.011653458,0.0006683117,0.00048184957,0.0009548505,0.0031976546,0.000034021363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1853018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24177197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1853018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013812392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00737344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3684464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}