{"meta":{"query_hash":"05754fa525de","filters":{"venue":"Dalhousie law journal"},"cohort_total":143,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":143,"exported":143,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/05754fa525de","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Dalhousie+law+journal"},"results":[{"id":"W117286435","doi":"","title":"In Search of \"Compass and Gyroscope\": Where Were Adaptive Management and Principled Negotiation in Nova Scotia's Forest-Strategy Process?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Political science; Prosperity; Negotiation; Politics; Humanities; Geography; Sociology; Ethnology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018725140159879305,"score_gpt":0.27409360868657834,"score_spread":0.25536846852669903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W117286435","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9787442,0.00020137394,0.00007810434,0.0001646192,0.000055923367,0.00027434962,0.0000025306026,0.000005036079,0.020473825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99877304,0.0001318923,0.00067135267,0.00006705325,0.00003806549,0.0000033106621,0.0000019071898,0.000010405903,0.00030299308],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884707,0.00008041438,0.00027815427,0.00015532813,0.0002729103,0.00036612278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964046,0.00002397551,0.00010590185,0.00010652536,0.000007585342,0.000115547744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059967005,0.00012384671,0.00016186561,0.000108472545,0.00006695216,0.000056941633,0.00016825776,0.000047567723,0.0003740092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000049077266,0.000110332134,0.000016266962,0.00025056006,0.00013819922,0.0009029846,0.00021227228,0.00020790777,0.00004064033],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000645505,0.00013367897,0.98313445,0.00007366966,0.000014266163,0.000016854437,0.001347023,0.0028339557,0.00003819161,0.010751595,0.00034820152,0.0012435358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009823191,0.00010403172,0.9941519,0.00006724398,0.000009486524,0.00002034067,0.00027974197,0.002391367,0.00006686928,0.0009167216,0.0008735691,0.00013638943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003731485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03627001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032538526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007803936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006656109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98131555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1424791837","doi":"","title":"Thin-Skull Plaintiffs, Socio-Cultural \"Abnormalities\" and the Dangers of an Objective Test for Hypersensitivity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Prudence; Tort; Humanities; Law; Compensation (psychology); Insanity defense; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Liability; Social psychology; Philosophy; Insanity; Epistemology","score_opus":0.031026230842650944,"score_gpt":0.36324996588627184,"score_spread":0.3322237350436209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1424791837","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9541313,0.00009912553,0.00038646325,0.019865748,0.00080775627,0.000793087,0.00008324072,0.000045000157,0.023788258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936202,0.0000590942,0.0009978701,0.0035631845,0.0013630742,0.00002747942,0.000012770321,0.000018492277,0.00033779698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99661976,0.0018716796,0.0005357039,0.00019175324,0.00033223128,0.00044889553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98899806,0.009569822,0.0004795471,0.0002500034,0.00044695006,0.0002556255],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060692905,0.0001585426,0.00044176783,0.000027166907,0.0021077069,0.000043815973,0.00018120019,0.00019688552,0.00011890068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005239706,0.000090327274,0.000119675664,0.000060553688,0.00090157887,0.0004753749,0.000078749435,0.0011284858,0.000011587782],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004099514,0.00084693066,0.019652102,0.0014900431,0.00048701826,0.000036071193,0.32258523,0.000031608804,0.0015624984,0.62049466,0.012095912,0.016618399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.018540666,0.0019048458,0.027809523,0.0006672406,0.00069594465,0.0004213605,0.3915697,0.0044710925,0.000607137,0.052438743,0.5000758,0.0007979231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014608555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015524077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5680559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000473116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000111927104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2203954623","doi":"","title":"Keeping up with the Joneses: A Model Systemic Risk Reporting Regime for the Canadian Hedge Fund Industry","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Insurance and Financial Risk Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hedge fund; Political science; Welfare economics; Business; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.107517974843185,"score_gpt":0.2627959264335336,"score_spread":0.15527795159034863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2203954623","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6293427,0.013381104,0.16022171,0.014603756,0.0047512017,0.0029438108,0.0004766629,0.00011536027,0.17416371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99647385,0.00013375338,0.00034353943,0.0011961018,0.000653317,0.00006214872,0.0000029312216,0.000040615523,0.0010937249],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811053,0.000025715239,0.00095556735,0.0002645426,0.00010316492,0.0005404724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99698573,0.000064958156,0.002112853,0.00045120082,0.00017072662,0.00021451619],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043926593,0.000175519,0.00036124504,0.000110494824,0.001962332,0.00046157697,0.00047853118,0.00016885772,0.0000073244014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000325858,0.000114724164,0.00013542855,0.00023333853,0.000106585736,0.00029434147,0.00005005766,0.0008876441,0.00003718012],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018278856,0.00004548171,0.075043306,0.000074745134,0.00047588738,0.00014129282,0.009433376,0.09275047,0.0000011424283,0.79278874,0.023670886,0.0053918753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040392084,0.00037081935,0.0114756385,0.0003724834,0.000238598,0.001491174,0.010611852,0.18251052,0.000012051435,0.08157765,0.70597917,0.0013208248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07482983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22428495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7112111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003596785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002855538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99933696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2227833285","doi":"","title":"Directors’ Legal Duties and CSR: Prohibited, Permitted or Prescribed in Contemporary Corporate Law?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate social responsibility; Law; Business; Corporate law; Legal status; Political science; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.04963109755988988,"score_gpt":0.22849763975187012,"score_spread":0.17886654219198025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2227833285","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88677615,0.0001982762,0.000031446983,0.0006607848,0.0006013523,0.00032340863,0.000005163224,0.00016781641,0.111235626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934307,0.000012103057,0.00007913102,0.0023517665,0.0019164416,0.00001092846,0.000032204192,0.00005610114,0.0021106699],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981748,0.00006908663,0.0006012402,0.00035471283,0.00035065116,0.0004495011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988259,0.000060952898,0.0006057946,0.00023826315,0.000207871,0.00006123644],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069154374,0.00033181589,0.0004647125,0.00023009442,0.00072461553,0.0014161068,0.00028542685,0.00011615619,0.00040181243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025990494,0.00023995336,0.000084117346,0.00026997685,0.00028910872,0.0023063358,0.00017509892,0.00048316785,0.000078733465],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00060795905,0.00019287015,0.017226249,0.0001829293,0.00005243785,0.00066985964,0.00023778997,0.00001226436,0.00039234656,0.9727784,0.0065648924,0.0010820368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005025282,0.00013436379,0.023636438,0.00041068112,0.0000858863,0.0002724435,0.00022197532,0.001939446,0.00019883916,0.11636628,0.8507163,0.0009920787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027889896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019684656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85641205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028952894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052432784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2333033842","doi":"","title":"Unlimited Liability in the Modern Context: An Examination of Shareholder Liability in Nova Scotia Unlimited Liability Companies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Statutory law; Corporate law; Bankruptcy; Jurisdiction; Context (archaeology); Insolvency; Limited liability partnership; Liability; Strict liability; Business; Political science; Finance; History; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.06774176622991555,"score_gpt":0.2602254604372612,"score_spread":0.19248369420734562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2333033842","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99026763,0.00009839675,0.00011368517,0.0009214435,0.00036664912,0.00054823695,0.00002660354,0.000046919216,0.0076104165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981737,0.0000046631108,0.000069736074,0.00119225,0.00042998258,0.000007881087,0.00006930945,0.000028340975,0.000024128178],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99681854,0.00034286626,0.0010798324,0.0004713272,0.0008129204,0.00047449695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997421,0.00020024432,0.00077984197,0.0007116223,0.0008348612,0.0000523866],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055124876,0.00032010934,0.0005484437,0.00022658859,0.00015348227,0.00043048064,0.0007723129,0.00016502643,0.0001726596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063190045,0.0002470914,0.00013157126,0.0011723732,0.00035436658,0.0027394635,0.00019127701,0.00071563345,0.00002726355],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00069565803,0.0037584957,0.9271661,0.0004181542,0.000042900574,0.000083245985,0.00796919,0.0053075613,0.00032829103,0.030603576,0.0007711949,0.022855615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024671736,0.000086570515,0.95305365,0.00015343369,0.00004229841,0.000010661939,0.0034512996,0.020457648,0.00006765066,0.016206581,0.0036468485,0.000356206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017809117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14366847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12585935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021553847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010092198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337390637","doi":"","title":"The Contract of Employment at the Supreme Court of Canada: Employee Protection and the Presumption of Employer Freedom","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of contract; Law; Presumption; Labour law; Employment contract; Supreme court; Notice; Exclusion clause; Economics; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Contract management; Management; Engineering","score_opus":0.026696156329836157,"score_gpt":0.26351942403558193,"score_spread":0.23682326770574577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337390637","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9859363,0.0006854228,0.00007150778,0.008760515,0.00054623967,0.0005984114,0.00004378235,0.000005832229,0.0033519997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989217,0.00024071662,0.0000126963005,0.00011764194,0.0001674893,0.000010606485,6.930401e-7,0.000007453508,0.0005210022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980534,0.0004664402,0.00039296804,0.00007583049,0.0008005498,0.00021084379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985947,0.0002407061,0.00045503225,0.00018620919,0.00043237675,0.00009095022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002785542,0.000077920035,0.00016992331,0.000013613676,0.0011694666,0.000050727715,0.0002833956,0.000042920616,0.00003769789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021598772,0.000034530454,0.0000593269,0.00009831454,0.00093620317,0.00011148374,0.000067281,0.00017112303,1.1761757e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019830477,0.00033440793,0.067492224,0.000025339052,0.0009523724,0.000007524982,0.055443414,0.0012068184,0.0030795834,0.8234109,0.03729154,0.008772805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006710846,0.00049797236,0.4131524,0.00013720218,0.00031040216,0.000033292567,0.01282906,0.00016681003,0.0036690074,0.014194059,0.5480109,0.00028805688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7015017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9584786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80921686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012806561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046393642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.899471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589723758","doi":"","title":"Nom De Plume: Who Writes the Supreme Court's \"By the Court\" Judgments?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Humanities; Political science; Redaction; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.021664389761494502,"score_gpt":0.27380010781380726,"score_spread":0.2521357180523128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2589723758","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13096732,0.0058271363,0.0021222644,0.4224625,0.0019496682,0.00048290752,0.00014019775,0.00012329636,0.43592474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99096936,0.0018299256,0.000028838776,0.003435218,0.0016912466,0.000010701221,5.8989764e-7,0.000008679013,0.002025449],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820346,0.00027300586,0.00022420264,0.00012971835,0.0006605748,0.0005090274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998981,0.000446077,0.00013619529,0.00012962487,0.00016778016,0.00013933393],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014418861,0.00012124027,0.00014566947,0.000014247295,0.005496936,0.00027394318,0.0006254,0.000063388405,0.0004863302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019144395,0.00005311773,0.000116234354,0.00012727805,0.0018125329,0.00024827587,0.00009212149,0.0002554336,0.00011067685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003502912,0.000077186676,0.012081357,0.0000013489549,0.00018173584,0.000023697949,0.0062782876,0.000004514735,0.0005047848,0.7211231,0.24752891,0.012160056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030339375,0.000026505417,0.0029986335,0.00004578722,0.000041315652,0.000037475096,0.0030581618,0.0000025465026,0.00009014672,0.045736596,0.94753885,0.000120608674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067402422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0146049615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86000204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015558215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022666495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2595340809","doi":"","title":"Moving Beyond Rhetoric: Working Toward Reconciliation Through Self-Determination","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; Indigenous rights; Humanities; Law; Declaration; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.049418196592425155,"score_gpt":0.32046868282084073,"score_spread":0.2710504862284156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2595340809","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16589007,0.0005436121,0.0015375754,0.0012739608,0.007512946,0.00035306226,0.0000020940836,0.00019438266,0.8226923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97729415,0.003593722,0.009213352,0.00026979053,0.006941385,0.0000026164582,0.000010338949,0.000029814846,0.0026448364],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997725,0.00042300875,0.0004087347,0.00019134962,0.0007178813,0.0005340172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855864,0.00010486384,0.0003746704,0.00012941074,0.0005272272,0.00030520684],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025709905,0.00012708952,0.00016979765,0.000076660945,0.00831867,0.0003342885,0.00026599423,0.0001818178,0.00007676778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027193042,0.00011169427,0.00007076219,0.00029319094,0.000092501374,0.0010571359,0.0000025413103,0.00034173814,0.00007293433],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013626756,0.00008338153,0.0005747669,0.000012153852,0.000013868805,0.000011177939,0.7843415,0.000013792215,0.0000013111808,0.21078093,0.00037361312,0.0037798441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029581465,0.00005894353,0.0001809764,0.000038702987,0.000022136019,0.000044481138,0.012041443,0.000050396153,0.000049497685,0.01918992,0.96785074,0.00017694864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031817865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4533229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96747714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001071398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052743554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9929724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599308209","doi":"","title":"Defining Métis People as a People: Moving Beyond the Indian/Métis Dichotomy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"South Asian Studies and Conflicts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metis; Genealogy; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.01650442214867186,"score_gpt":0.28303758677171564,"score_spread":0.2665331646230438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599308209","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5528394,0.002407428,0.00012464364,0.014439578,0.0021092857,0.00032152,0.000019111656,0.00013497718,0.42760405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947035,0.00024701713,0.00023571163,0.0025777689,0.0012727132,0.000021779266,0.0000026699554,0.000031394517,0.00090748444],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970523,0.00032769455,0.0003614923,0.0002439547,0.0010227398,0.0009917968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835277,0.0002765455,0.00027991162,0.00025392862,0.0002585867,0.0005782597],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021670023,0.00020389051,0.00031183255,0.000067648325,0.004617823,0.00073705765,0.0006741632,0.00013037582,0.00034641215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006168911,0.00015219,0.00016272496,0.0006185804,0.00027605865,0.00037245668,0.00024023108,0.00061409466,0.00038072374],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044228214,0.000056775567,0.070818774,0.000008176417,0.00016237643,0.0002469481,0.62726736,0.000021922922,0.000003865719,0.26738554,0.015540183,0.018443804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010944329,0.00012703527,0.019088633,0.00005136258,0.00009195161,0.00033870334,0.32363015,0.000015520875,0.0000074329337,0.011140068,0.6439911,0.00042360005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016772263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07925689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62845093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001423182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048699247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99667805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602224305","doi":"","title":"Judgment and Opportunity: Decision Assignment on the McLachlin Court","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Humanities; Redaction; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.08282033351291515,"score_gpt":0.24322079937221452,"score_spread":0.16040046585929937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602224305","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4691153,0.004426186,0.009483313,0.01726967,0.0066701816,0.0007578191,0.00016348323,0.00007499036,0.49203908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948048,0.00042058053,0.00020562822,0.0033377842,0.00083195366,0.000010181333,0.0000031929478,0.000030327892,0.00035555795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842966,0.0000494051,0.0008024562,0.00027826536,0.000104736326,0.00033546923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985111,0.00013219431,0.00050924614,0.0003198124,0.00004545271,0.00048223732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029450962,0.00015314105,0.00040214337,0.00008960073,0.00047687182,0.00035940096,0.00028804556,0.000104368926,0.0003191991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015198629,0.00014116804,0.00010193202,0.00006132803,0.00014942954,0.000211792,0.00009002597,0.00031472705,0.00039375486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007348223,0.00013815965,0.00589281,0.000004815556,0.00009602962,0.000035795565,0.00069424335,0.00022639008,0.0000031487011,0.9497418,0.039291054,0.0038022632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013550292,0.0003365316,0.001309244,0.00005250877,0.000012285122,0.00014144625,0.00059611053,0.001036041,0.000036694364,0.39611927,0.59868014,0.0003247006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005333853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027565597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5593891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002530351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048916434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57566655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602589497","doi":"","title":"High Freshets and Low-Lying Farms: Property Law and St. John River Flooding in Colonial New Brunswick","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Private property; Legislature; Legislation; Political science; Ethnology; Geography; SAINT; Property rights; Corporate governance; Humanities; Law; History; Art; Business; Art history","score_opus":0.017895989863882304,"score_gpt":0.2060680090611872,"score_spread":0.1881720191973049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602589497","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98036647,0.0011032218,0.000015459265,0.015457703,0.00037610633,0.00009792102,0.000012203251,0.000028756716,0.002542132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99173236,0.0013273114,0.00010294271,0.0008270251,0.0012733112,0.0000019453998,0.0000013274638,0.000016251464,0.0047175256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988585,0.000061270366,0.00031416325,0.00021278008,0.00021563622,0.00033766543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948686,0.00005754527,0.000111302696,0.00007013678,0.000081757804,0.00019239525],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018187545,0.00017569908,0.00033864923,0.000037247282,0.0030546142,0.00028808767,0.000108281194,0.00006055648,0.00039798915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002147028,0.00008306102,0.00007938856,0.00003586384,0.00045813897,0.00040271133,0.00009851433,0.00023281247,0.000013724097],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017391067,0.00017582871,0.0030830363,0.000066418535,0.00041012056,0.0003001282,0.23057947,0.000007532832,0.00037577003,0.7200621,0.011560417,0.03320531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022748508,0.00022154964,0.00072760374,0.00022374575,0.00011893958,0.000048507558,0.0017058924,0.000019254101,0.000023833058,0.014039114,0.9801611,0.00043565073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053561788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2950426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96860063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031398312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030227837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2603201379","doi":"","title":"Limiting the Legal Liability of Religious Institutions for their Clergy: Cavanaugh v. Grenville Christian College","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Appeal; Liability; Obligation; Law; Jurisprudence; Legal liability","score_opus":0.03983698994163903,"score_gpt":0.3037155938956197,"score_spread":0.26387860395398066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2603201379","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8313914,0.0017421361,0.0010543931,0.082243845,0.0022914843,0.0013942322,0.0006723323,0.00013827119,0.0790719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997174,0.00058433734,0.0004966781,0.00024708646,0.0010717179,0.00002860179,0.0000011482158,0.000012522209,0.00038387178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981557,0.00027296145,0.00046323627,0.00019696752,0.00040553964,0.0005055672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980859,0.00076703937,0.0003319154,0.00019304974,0.00045968496,0.00016237517],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014059079,0.00016119312,0.0002853037,0.000023027618,0.0047188303,0.00009209595,0.00048429036,0.00011036454,0.000051054423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001261727,0.000078412944,0.00027283133,0.00019364347,0.0016155615,0.0002827246,0.00009902783,0.00022290331,0.000008103207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012942113,0.00022212834,0.0033644298,0.00003454504,0.0003222451,0.00001751504,0.044499334,0.000059932023,0.0012750783,0.9158984,0.022666564,0.011510438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069793337,0.0000877052,0.002344158,0.00009106735,0.0000439725,0.00001884988,0.01779131,0.000007518169,0.00040003296,0.0049931468,0.9733345,0.00018981319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012355316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056639176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9506679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029838126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024879412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606519287","doi":"","title":"The Doctrine of Lost Modern Grant and Prescriptive Easements in Newfoundland","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Easement; Political science; Humanities; Doctrine; Law; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02591238136236075,"score_gpt":0.28901682981998017,"score_spread":0.26310444845761943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606519287","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9708982,0.0015586297,0.00006101014,0.0065081553,0.00029774467,0.00023312036,0.000012948783,0.0000099458,0.02042022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99639255,0.002273343,0.000052907846,0.000055516135,0.00018119377,0.0000031170707,1.4160854e-7,0.0000046258106,0.0010365926],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988044,0.00018049162,0.00023726576,0.0001025734,0.00037868644,0.00029658314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936676,0.00020364021,0.0001426351,0.00006412567,0.00012440095,0.00009843156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067197165,0.00008422141,0.00014662708,0.000016787175,0.0010207538,0.000092305185,0.00015618757,0.00003987115,0.00003699631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017790913,0.00003893967,0.00004312594,0.000076397555,0.00063409953,0.0002646271,0.00007322848,0.00012064229,0.0000057387056],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005554046,0.0002990586,0.57394147,0.000028804772,0.00041513608,0.00012367444,0.13712716,0.000014090176,0.005300249,0.17043462,0.0023064946,0.10945382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006241842,0.00029094305,0.5186122,0.0004480883,0.00009050313,0.000040691615,0.013299615,0.00004871923,0.00030343028,0.051438004,0.40862653,0.0005594239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020296045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1860081,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40632004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014906851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029132761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98622787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2742003287","doi":"","title":"Ikechi Mgbeoji, Collective Insecurity: Liberian Crisis, Unilateralism & Global Order","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unilateralism; Order (exchange); Political science; International law; Development economics; Political economy; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.01226709351679937,"score_gpt":0.2837545724333579,"score_spread":0.2714874789165585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2742003287","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62387824,0.0007439079,0.0008889904,0.04312825,0.0032035527,0.00053851394,0.00016730507,0.0003496089,0.32710165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99055564,0.00047884666,0.0014897771,0.0062425043,0.00082608144,0.0000042501824,0.000013982461,0.000024218238,0.00036467225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973288,0.0002982286,0.0004053264,0.0003088668,0.0008059556,0.0008528048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985662,0.000028797598,0.00020227848,0.00021871454,0.0004455681,0.0005384449],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071164244,0.00025109152,0.0003240549,0.00006374981,0.0025869766,0.0007467604,0.0006074068,0.00029332825,0.0002189545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010844204,0.00024686064,0.00018248438,0.000936865,0.00039212487,0.0007110422,0.00010882959,0.0005958251,0.000100446385],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009127153,0.00034506677,0.0010681236,0.000007740405,0.00013049615,0.0004971133,0.046325866,0.00030841888,0.0000213459,0.93938535,0.011265695,0.0005534866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017666356,0.00016684634,0.0012251652,0.00004745143,0.00006403246,0.00027889106,0.00956104,0.000017424389,0.000019012652,0.43643996,0.5498997,0.0005138276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025021642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17608662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.538634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010602431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010722101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751192372","doi":"","title":"The Significance of the Systemic Relative Autonomy of Labour Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Labour law; Freedom of association; Labor relations; Doctrine; Autonomy; Industrial relations; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Humanities; Human rights; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017971541869034668,"score_gpt":0.2869949877568354,"score_spread":0.26902344588780075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751192372","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4878686,0.00040929214,0.00012550072,0.008860525,0.0021635387,0.0004990464,0.0000809549,0.000016742573,0.49997577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99481994,0.00009870411,0.000047493926,0.00017927865,0.00022079248,0.0000034041514,9.870394e-8,0.000006140158,0.004624133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987863,0.00026790978,0.00028421343,0.00007398901,0.00038011535,0.00020750525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836314,0.00014380747,0.00079967285,0.0003797475,0.00025314395,0.000060479666],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012564339,0.000063449435,0.00013396856,0.000007647554,0.005344338,0.00018559223,0.0010130265,0.0000496506,0.000054623673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015288685,0.00003280944,0.00010109425,0.00006347344,0.0012373008,0.00029313253,0.000090806396,0.00022991441,0.0000013601215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048530464,0.000017399612,0.0021454426,0.0000030700785,0.000038704966,0.0000011635834,0.004112302,0.0000088534125,0.00034125417,0.9926542,0.00010698395,0.00056575873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044745917,0.000040454484,0.06404934,0.00016675657,0.000040404324,0.000005629742,0.0042559677,0.000006307142,0.0012752856,0.050301027,0.87930024,0.00011114305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014489194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022249183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9423532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006832782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002909024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2754223474","doi":"","title":"On Being a Second: Grace Wambolt, Legal Professionalism and ‘Inter-Wave’ Feminism in Nova Scotia","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Humanities; Economic Justice; Political science; Feminism; Ethnology; Law; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.029856061047569195,"score_gpt":0.2965310434822352,"score_spread":0.266674982434666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2754223474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62282395,0.00033758022,0.000009529037,0.006102593,0.0022159768,0.00014041686,0.000021791184,0.000019056311,0.36832908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98357475,0.000047168294,0.00005833228,0.00095104723,0.00038319122,0.0000016705018,0.0000010049105,0.000013203125,0.014969612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987731,0.00013075376,0.00022191893,0.00018661599,0.00032834042,0.00035925824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992426,0.00006673224,0.0002129701,0.00019634543,0.000051443498,0.0002298912],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093127077,0.00010366015,0.0002178556,0.00021645192,0.0038643647,0.0016996217,0.0003211231,0.000120655415,0.0019030016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012370906,0.00011087009,0.00009751828,0.000048835092,0.00073466834,0.00069736573,0.00007425711,0.00061246095,0.000051758805],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065837376,0.00014396824,0.0016174999,0.000034707387,0.00014237188,0.0018376727,0.041974768,0.0000017191796,0.00014159392,0.91361547,0.03178248,0.008641888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008045136,0.000056318044,0.014688192,0.00021199607,0.00006127585,0.0001699287,0.0017299033,0.0000060848447,0.0000144496,0.023370795,0.95860606,0.0002804946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39943153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9849757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92682356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000306429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040490512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918042740","doi":"","title":"Social Membership: Animal Law beyond the Property/Personhood Impasse","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Oppression; Animal rights; Property (philosophy); Political science; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.0341325230237471,"score_gpt":0.2735632266385156,"score_spread":0.23943070361476854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2918042740","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20276184,0.000051492585,0.000009597044,0.047159333,0.0003923767,0.00021238548,0.000016073442,0.000038073253,0.74935883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99339694,0.000025691777,0.00017638084,0.0045391647,0.0009885064,0.000007348415,0.000002391863,0.000035337227,0.0008282225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980683,0.00013656363,0.00026500635,0.0002860926,0.00072208897,0.00052196975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989681,0.00003756812,0.00028861698,0.00048476653,0.0000075439007,0.0002133801],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008411212,0.00023364919,0.00019025008,0.000008237739,0.0076867137,0.00060881866,0.0011879511,0.00016806666,0.0022216383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026240747,0.00013214008,0.00018981282,0.000036676294,0.002078875,0.0009600601,0.0005634128,0.0010716788,0.0007382606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009946494,0.0016543313,0.036372762,0.00006314512,0.0005180546,0.0013635119,0.03098512,0.0003430402,0.043584343,0.7910657,0.077911906,0.015143464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003355007,0.0009105379,0.08716447,0.00005715229,0.00030147057,0.0019667465,0.0021880248,0.00024405087,0.006683298,0.2319564,0.6635085,0.0016643526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010860862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002599083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7906351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015088236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011230027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971457275","doi":"","title":"Air travel, accidents and injuries: why the new Montreal Convention is already outdated","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Political science; Law; Forensic engineering; Business; Engineering","score_opus":0.013939246481466586,"score_gpt":0.2908358932744592,"score_spread":0.2768966467929926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971457275","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6459386,0.0004859559,0.002647857,0.12011537,0.0016665376,0.0004785318,0.00005252816,0.00010552367,0.22850914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877917,0.00021567449,0.00010535785,0.004502742,0.0016072543,0.0000016106496,0.000009077812,0.000008708993,0.0057578622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988548,0.00011956156,0.00023322621,0.0001103249,0.00047171372,0.000210342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944425,0.00005050234,0.0001660363,0.00006870686,0.00013770735,0.00013280247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053306733,0.000084602456,0.000094279436,0.000033411376,0.0011361018,0.00028076302,0.00021616182,0.00007155467,0.00052523805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039675888,0.000062530606,0.000060699393,0.00007968191,0.00012576951,0.0006295615,0.000024669847,0.00019112536,0.000056316847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013993146,0.00015839338,0.0062510115,0.000004351753,0.00019319958,0.000015244171,0.050869044,0.0000461671,0.00029516156,0.74416906,0.1395559,0.058302548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009637993,0.00006105714,0.036378887,0.000038958162,0.00005328624,0.000035261717,0.0022364142,0.00014022505,0.00071277394,0.025184153,0.93401486,0.00018029983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01976809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06833292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.794459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007707559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000084534164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98675936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004119251","doi":"","title":"Disrupting Business as Usual: Considering Teaching Methods in Business Law Classrooms","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Business Law and Ethics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commercial law; Business as usual; Legal education; Business education; Law; Business; Political science; Sociology; Mathematics education; Economics; Higher education; Psychology; Management","score_opus":0.029948543677443557,"score_gpt":0.31617675250574273,"score_spread":0.2862282088282992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004119251","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5687597,0.00039762747,0.013730867,0.0076312255,0.006560261,0.0006131476,0.0000037851266,0.00050145516,0.40180194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9753307,0.000042516753,0.011539588,0.009088259,0.003328774,0.000013177487,0.00002649704,0.00019923203,0.00043123844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99619776,0.00016908908,0.0011262809,0.00064189103,0.00073616276,0.0011288201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99738467,0.00039670925,0.00077649014,0.0005522179,0.0008198663,0.00007006369],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040814257,0.00058485876,0.00083380635,0.00044509946,0.0012294383,0.0021436997,0.00073323224,0.00037685575,0.0006928974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000706715,0.00053785474,0.00017979651,0.0013347436,0.00025374207,0.004629415,0.0006181732,0.0020365464,0.00052640063],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012502856,0.00023276986,0.020725885,0.0007900262,0.000079216006,0.00045251948,0.00036553343,0.0039256318,0.003589397,0.957332,0.00024584605,0.012136155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038524605,0.000021457097,0.01953832,0.0016522629,0.0001782026,0.0010450007,0.0016535593,0.0074614207,0.00015675549,0.052828446,0.9098325,0.0017796204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0117448345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040223184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90958667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012541644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001224132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010759745","doi":"","title":"Financial Responsibility Requirements for OilAnd Gas Activities Offshore Nova Scotiaand Newfoundland","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Marine and Offshore Engineering Studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova (rocket); Submarine pipeline; Finance; Business; Oceanography; Geology; Engineering; Aeronautics","score_opus":0.02139945807232363,"score_gpt":0.2569723301548197,"score_spread":0.23557287208249605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010759745","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9602244,0.00076610525,0.013627299,0.00025231476,0.0025405749,0.00029431414,0.000044862067,0.0002758602,0.021974264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99584144,0.0004025737,0.001514262,0.00009038114,0.0015042352,0.000014772865,0.000013201589,0.00005888847,0.00056024623],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986279,0.000022989483,0.00037503257,0.0001941776,0.00025021195,0.0005297017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940044,0.00012248984,0.000054714634,0.00022836367,0.00008134819,0.000112641945],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043605626,0.00026914495,0.0003480284,0.000102008926,0.00036868246,0.00014326899,0.00018625929,0.000102624625,0.00010782387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000103931954,0.00024573525,0.00014138235,0.00014188896,0.00007248161,0.00030595076,0.000052033003,0.00033527426,0.0000075214307],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006135144,0.0010589731,0.36562866,0.0023907134,0.0029980256,0.0016842185,0.007917864,0.076658115,0.012169178,0.026892526,0.24019763,0.25626895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004973957,0.00061781495,0.06610188,0.00028522508,0.00021666457,0.000992264,0.00019244324,0.0070246975,0.0017773915,0.0066978806,0.9096997,0.0014201138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008290543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058962675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.669502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012466391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036741756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010815349","doi":"","title":"Removing a \"Section 96\" Judge:An Historical Case Study","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Law; Legal history; International law; Political science; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.059065879564704014,"score_gpt":0.37600146429289255,"score_spread":0.31693558472818856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010815349","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81215495,0.00003376916,0.000082618586,0.011795102,0.0022097745,0.00015278882,8.541565e-7,0.00009094649,0.17347921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878299,0.000022634851,0.00047433737,0.00097376155,0.0029853682,0.0000056413305,0.0000010799856,0.000012679198,0.007694594],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982841,0.00057990546,0.0003133701,0.00015646924,0.000414824,0.00025134356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911743,0.00011373902,0.00014032023,0.00015716476,0.0002299703,0.00024138621],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017037811,0.00008291537,0.000105166924,0.000084486834,0.0036114878,0.0006111084,0.00016419454,0.00007577264,0.0046967138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023517842,0.00008141483,0.00004723809,0.0005067828,0.00005906322,0.0016998851,0.000008386771,0.00084297935,0.000087551816],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014524422,0.005172125,0.010583873,0.0000067490096,0.00012478624,0.00684223,0.5395788,0.0001486684,0.00010951691,0.05152607,0.05667906,0.32908285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002670531,0.00013090196,0.00037758707,0.0000033288109,0.00002965946,0.0033236514,0.039373424,0.000016459715,0.0000016548702,0.0005224026,0.9558341,0.00011980666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12438677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11000156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.899155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061282987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004613464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010839882","doi":"","title":"The Origins of a Coming Crisis: Renewal of theChurchill Falls Contract","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science; Law; Forensic engineering; Engineering","score_opus":0.01942082604207084,"score_gpt":0.3134432318212428,"score_spread":0.29402240577917194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010839882","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5900124,0.0005074402,0.0005626052,0.0012195766,0.000768384,0.000116797215,0.000013989216,0.000019869101,0.40677896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982876,0.0003638781,0.00018270491,0.0003702131,0.0005244109,2.689064e-7,5.125717e-7,0.0000102670065,0.0002601064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983436,0.00020524845,0.000501648,0.00007851526,0.00058275665,0.00028826113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839103,0.00057592825,0.00044405874,0.000120401,0.00035097642,0.00011763143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035704072,0.00007719144,0.00015947329,0.000042185737,0.00071860483,0.000088165136,0.0004995026,0.000046467154,0.000086751934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002586383,0.00005187169,0.00014526176,0.00010630506,0.0003589976,0.0001842706,0.000028769811,0.00026833688,0.0000066000957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008811662,0.00005571539,0.0005939606,0.0000019048789,0.00005763348,0.000019472005,0.003082941,0.000006824402,0.0016165149,0.99240416,0.00020183764,0.0018709337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067610975,0.00012091352,0.003579592,0.000073549454,0.000034376775,0.000028794799,0.004371707,0.000015257149,0.0041393777,0.0076673464,0.97916377,0.00012918779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035449958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010986885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9847368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000085179345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010308993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.613094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010901749","doi":"","title":"Effective and Efficient Regulation of the Offshore Oil Industry:The 2001 White Rose Public Review Process","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Marine and Offshore Engineering Studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"White (mutation); Rose (mathematics); White paper; Submarine pipeline; Business; Process (computing); Legislation; Engineering; Law; Political science; Computer science; Chemistry; Mathematics","score_opus":0.00833438428284983,"score_gpt":0.21773972171672812,"score_spread":0.2094053374338783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010901749","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8673238,0.060392987,0.0016266032,0.0031400896,0.0021011783,0.0010330706,0.000034431912,0.00023445001,0.06411335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99792933,0.0016275763,0.00005102054,0.00010679411,0.000092106944,0.000017526028,0.0000013040074,0.000023741353,0.00015061919],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990743,0.00009250096,0.00026202304,0.0000942162,0.00024158767,0.00023540661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994511,0.000066748726,0.00008441506,0.00019193065,0.00014132987,0.00006449841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007361918,0.0001506001,0.00021796339,0.000031409185,0.0002339754,0.000044353546,0.00015748906,0.0000775714,0.0000400239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023282871,0.00008683847,0.00005889633,0.00034452454,0.00008178877,0.00006865772,0.000037078345,0.0005823062,0.0000011249094],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006187014,0.00046276854,0.15185279,0.013645696,0.0018782995,0.000037704245,0.0070403307,0.55373806,0.0008549745,0.026806565,0.090501726,0.15311924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024507171,0.0002267581,0.61565256,0.0067616925,0.0006859925,0.0016507631,0.00056958024,0.025782743,0.0048422054,0.0010249882,0.33882794,0.00152406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006617053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010085246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5279553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003390996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019556397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.354117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010910245","doi":"","title":"Designating the Dean of Law: Legal Education at McGill University andthe Montreal Corporate and Professional Elite, 1946-1950.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Elite; Law; Legal education; Legal profession; Political science; Sociology; Management; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.016817071686618494,"score_gpt":0.23010280630304647,"score_spread":0.21328573461642797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010910245","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8310997,0.00052635383,0.000027886677,0.0041947206,0.0008740573,0.00021943399,0.00011284224,0.000024180523,0.16292086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926729,0.00024082705,0.00020338772,0.0003829486,0.00022257566,4.9568354e-7,0.0000034790833,0.0000066380303,0.006266741],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991386,0.00018594794,0.00013349985,0.000098116005,0.00027061327,0.00017324097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933094,0.000052395033,0.00024864802,0.0000692634,0.00013443544,0.00016431119],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048288042,0.00005579694,0.00009131106,0.00007951645,0.0048236856,0.00009241699,0.000166843,0.00005920651,0.00008373631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027698115,0.00005332482,0.00004723158,0.00012253331,0.00063908723,0.00036538986,0.000037808193,0.00019997946,0.00000462582],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007287646,0.00011966472,0.00037042508,0.000014271747,0.00003044806,0.00005252239,0.014395742,0.000070067326,0.00038681467,0.96819836,0.003987118,0.012301719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062272017,0.000038209182,0.0075850254,0.00009511014,0.00004636944,0.00008186453,0.0053827805,0.000005421192,0.00003855611,0.017713258,0.9682487,0.00014197458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5865946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95874494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9642616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081927376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008677453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010971666","doi":"","title":"Independence and the Director ofPublic Prosecutions: The Marshall Inquiryand Beyond","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.01375980048465353,"score_gpt":0.27270714850265143,"score_spread":0.2589473480179979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010971666","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46770152,0.00048194756,0.000020568004,0.015406219,0.00062615663,0.00030425802,0.000011469716,0.000038573526,0.5154093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9782074,0.00028559918,0.000036573987,0.0016760397,0.0014273569,0.0000120905015,0.000001480837,0.000007654779,0.018345824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984139,0.0003527711,0.00020317378,0.00012345375,0.0006440391,0.0002626508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993034,0.00022571886,0.000093000206,0.00012213252,0.00015762298,0.000098125114],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015711396,0.00008985421,0.00010738868,0.000025225623,0.0040215766,0.00078051304,0.00049241533,0.00006730703,0.0032177246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005136426,0.000043883425,0.0000710685,0.00006825303,0.0016051406,0.0004176687,0.000033693253,0.00041310186,0.000075220814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043705666,0.000023632747,0.000078439414,9.2926496e-7,0.000025277817,0.00000889045,0.008737655,0.0000021481242,0.0000018341262,0.9880629,0.0011264032,0.0018881906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006346089,0.000021864831,0.0015055495,0.0000151024005,0.000019281972,0.00011213511,0.00035283915,0.000022210681,0.0000075128464,0.41488218,0.5823356,0.00009110109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020847344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017354256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5812092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045738405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011236248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011019483","doi":"","title":"Brightening the Covenant Chain: Aboriginal TreatyMeanings in Law and History After Marshall","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Legal history; Law; International law; Political science; Chain (unit)","score_opus":0.01190556242959798,"score_gpt":0.2522090899315924,"score_spread":0.24030352750199444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011019483","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57356995,0.0030838829,0.000060349867,0.003121161,0.0008106482,0.00024466147,0.0000056290282,0.000049722978,0.419054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907043,0.0013467307,0.000110821136,0.0029679511,0.0009955962,0.000008656653,0.0000012584976,0.000022943652,0.003841758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980799,0.0002495169,0.0003019264,0.00021287549,0.00045512512,0.0007006825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993194,0.00009770908,0.00015019996,0.00014588458,0.00007974673,0.00020707106],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013224566,0.00016903179,0.00022312465,0.00006287254,0.0019035568,0.0002505718,0.0002990312,0.000118158474,0.00084989786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007972208,0.00010340548,0.00008583392,0.00012990485,0.0009621417,0.0003962812,0.00002507427,0.0005023268,0.00002161219],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000118012555,0.000083959145,0.0051004263,0.000005813003,0.00002477099,0.0014949775,0.122947,0.000004753351,0.000025182933,0.8678075,0.0007635388,0.0016240316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043452115,0.000054367796,0.002069648,0.000050025137,0.00002057152,0.00040362932,0.0016162375,0.000014117185,0.000005591481,0.004395745,0.9907502,0.00018536042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06591422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44632715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98998666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047109427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028528643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99939585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011027392","doi":"","title":"Welcomed Participants' or 'Environmental Vigilantes'?The CEPA Environmental Protection Action and theRole Of Citizen Suits in Federal Environmental Law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Action (physics); Political science; Environmental law; Environmental protection; Geography","score_opus":0.051198315684278316,"score_gpt":0.2692325831660606,"score_spread":0.21803426748178226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011027392","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99134755,0.00054067187,0.000018575696,0.00064325857,0.00025093203,0.00045733026,0.000031788128,0.000018211716,0.0066916924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99811536,0.00068386283,0.000011958577,0.0001861145,0.00043185044,0.000025211673,0.0000030196761,0.000021178817,0.0005214608],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785876,0.00041758252,0.0004445375,0.00022019166,0.0005818898,0.0004770084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993628,0.000077827295,0.00028040592,0.00010871457,0.000003101904,0.00016710784],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080339354,0.00017112697,0.0002486458,0.00004061494,0.0014673558,0.00016216072,0.00018999421,0.0001280739,0.0012506031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021380432,0.00012398046,0.000071737435,0.00007986,0.00074643194,0.0005440012,0.00006265708,0.00037146025,0.000038301438],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034537292,0.0067077833,0.3728458,0.0002836874,0.00073940924,0.00065280317,0.21173863,0.0004261724,0.2608897,0.015765738,0.0010859009,0.12541065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015610994,0.0037546917,0.2779463,0.00065056863,0.00036713856,0.0015663273,0.16371073,0.0023132705,0.029100034,0.008094305,0.4936925,0.0031931486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049293926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014520429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49260658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002354336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014787556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011049206","doi":"","title":"Key Issues in the New Regime of Occupational Health and Safety: The Right to RefuseWork and Directors' and Officers' Liability","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Occupational Health and Safety Research","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Key (lock); Business; Law; Political science; Accounting; Computer security","score_opus":0.0477741254491085,"score_gpt":0.4278900351905102,"score_spread":0.38011590974140175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011049206","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8206788,0.008556087,0.00024814127,0.15182643,0.00054318254,0.0025781295,0.000093373405,0.000023432067,0.015452429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98349696,0.0033498495,0.001976393,0.0100592105,0.00047367832,0.00003324268,0.000012000602,0.00002140228,0.00057728373],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956804,0.0023048993,0.00072959776,0.00022683566,0.00051257655,0.000545681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960646,0.0027454125,0.00023714485,0.00025958233,0.00017459171,0.0005186919],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061568343,0.00013656612,0.00031403545,0.000085655614,0.0020261535,0.00003238581,0.0001703994,0.00011248751,0.00015709506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010160666,0.00007604216,0.0000290256,0.00032654154,0.0001949274,0.00013115205,0.000078132056,0.0010227751,0.0000071825307],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030578726,0.00018996996,0.5828235,0.00053467747,0.000040007202,0.000011033166,0.04018815,0.000018102244,0.000009799664,0.33111042,0.027466722,0.0145497415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095487287,0.00026692453,0.54746664,0.00022520873,0.0000052552446,0.00004245833,0.0020422575,0.000013361105,0.00000328503,0.005920895,0.44297177,0.000087098386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023139534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007631437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41550505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009809338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013114095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99927306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011166540","doi":"","title":"Drainage Issues in the Atlantic CanadaOffshore Petroleum Industry","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Petroleum Processing and Analysis","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Petroleum; Drainage; Petroleum industry; Legislation; Business; Petroleum engineering; Geology; Law; Environmental science; Political science; Environmental engineering","score_opus":0.01249237229095617,"score_gpt":0.25402236768218805,"score_spread":0.24152999539123188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011166540","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7830495,0.0007810371,0.000014961392,0.0043478627,0.00005767481,0.000004245473,0.000004821052,0.000035881698,0.21170402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991466,0.00012109934,0.000042499916,0.00086115865,0.0008688027,0.00000382558,0.000013273848,0.00002425188,0.0065991078],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829537,0.00007057773,0.0003716154,0.00021429833,0.00053797266,0.00051017146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999255,0.000060853945,0.00016524314,0.0003207671,0.000051297277,0.00014685198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005439883,0.00020548169,0.00027208097,0.00009128416,0.00057789247,0.00037132867,0.0006584928,0.00023183359,0.0008575242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052417767,0.00014248068,0.00013404197,0.0002984783,0.00010570773,0.00018382064,0.000041594652,0.0017772603,0.000019526733],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000362235,0.0017136546,0.8121576,0.0004710179,0.0010213177,0.03701556,0.010196066,0.0034652264,0.02650672,0.017175922,0.034741983,0.055172734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016029784,0.0000471578,0.0042205285,0.00044592886,0.00022835982,0.0069674207,0.009474553,0.001409967,0.0008420197,0.0026317323,0.97139645,0.0007329317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010574336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030166872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93665445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009720367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009803879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99601436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011181201","doi":"","title":"Getting Their Feet Wet: The SupremeCourt and the Practical Implementationof Treaty Rights in the Marshall Case","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Eluvium; Geology; Geochemistry","score_opus":0.05018143380917115,"score_gpt":0.2543966475283737,"score_spread":0.20421521371920257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011181201","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89543134,0.00067709043,0.000037331465,0.017630981,0.00017283224,0.00030599197,0.000108717504,0.000009673831,0.08562606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99566424,0.0004520388,0.00019005894,0.0032259617,0.00033816302,0.000016049524,0.0000055659975,0.000012096982,0.000095801566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998533,0.00014050449,0.0006855635,0.00021904652,0.000044199358,0.00037764694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998904,0.00044483633,0.0002754761,0.000295645,0.000014071465,0.000065966495],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025135863,0.0001643552,0.00027080075,0.000041213996,0.0010531106,0.00054312084,0.00031693056,0.00006358849,0.0012184058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029622635,0.00008537883,0.00012334569,0.00010675933,0.00020051634,0.0003991852,0.000036836092,0.00048559706,0.000110025576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014811027,0.00012013584,0.0078035956,0.000006134449,0.00013975703,0.0004562384,0.0078033893,0.00017484323,6.7656686e-7,0.97575337,0.0038007498,0.0037929907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004512611,0.00009395666,0.014713631,0.000013938654,0.00004618602,0.020900581,0.004106094,0.0036138182,0.000008565027,0.30136886,0.6502646,0.00035714047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003599811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01195295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67438453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060323568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014996563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011307461","doi":"","title":"Imposing Self-Interest: Behavioural Law and Economics, theUltimatum Game, and Value Possibilities","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Value (mathematics); Self-interest; Law; Law and economics; Positive economics; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02724120270932362,"score_gpt":0.22073243754905897,"score_spread":0.19349123483973535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011307461","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93143773,0.0036926395,0.00008067702,0.0008885502,0.0010351358,0.00019629383,0.00015620353,0.00006739212,0.06244537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950283,0.0012159008,0.0012089467,0.0012491186,0.001067076,0.000005660269,0.0000067006235,0.000061601655,0.0001566966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769187,0.0000390645,0.0012053144,0.00048591336,0.000029075356,0.00054875744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986347,0.000069836955,0.00065551006,0.0002886562,0.000034988854,0.0003163064],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009330975,0.00026127638,0.00069422636,0.00012571111,0.00058496353,0.00088775915,0.00024766155,0.00018263995,0.00011117704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017943672,0.00032798524,0.00015885962,0.000038628685,0.0003946264,0.0010864,0.00013100122,0.00037498827,0.00008584053],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026689839,0.00007294233,0.02525067,0.000024834177,0.00010843648,0.0000086525,0.0022384194,0.00004715127,0.000009765908,0.9713773,0.00014518894,0.0006899594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0064157527,0.000640854,0.02591143,0.00022740259,0.0001371534,0.003509052,0.001968743,0.015224527,0.0005185142,0.74495745,0.19798219,0.0025069176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003974591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005156722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22641982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002403421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002386072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011321608","doi":"","title":"Slow on the Trigger: The Department of Fisheries and Oceans, theFisheries Act and the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fishery; Environmental law; Business; Environmental planning; Environmental protection; Political science; Law; Environmental science","score_opus":0.0147561664357298,"score_gpt":0.2561851339897758,"score_spread":0.24142896755404603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011321608","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48755357,0.0010808962,0.0000060312946,0.38460493,0.00022796555,0.0005322327,0.000049096645,0.000011769039,0.1259335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935014,0.0033374783,0.000040555493,0.0026297797,0.00021174093,0.000010145502,8.135861e-7,0.00000872541,0.00025931382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867636,0.00032262754,0.0001877573,0.00010800323,0.00038926533,0.00031600246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992204,0.00035648196,0.00013870274,0.0001398804,0.00001149148,0.00013306372],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011698464,0.00012883576,0.00017145762,0.000017322203,0.0057705655,0.00024146723,0.00024791356,0.00004844244,0.00007571208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005401986,0.00005250638,0.00007130724,0.00005497691,0.0033645686,0.00012467368,0.000061024755,0.00030967727,0.0000016586729],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014521352,0.000083095656,0.035726983,0.000006790482,0.00042953243,0.000027408645,0.1262783,0.000012622034,0.0000049442156,0.8192026,0.009837198,0.008245295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001423307,0.00018065826,0.16509357,0.000037174523,0.0001211816,0.00006999462,0.04277357,0.000003757546,0.00003407726,0.03163955,0.75842816,0.0001949844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.089271605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49698505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7875631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017280028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002464747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011341383","doi":"","title":"Reconceptualizing Professional Responsibility:Incorporating Equality","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Professional responsibility; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.11993809460788485,"score_gpt":0.4005033235033196,"score_spread":0.2805652288954347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011341383","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10792307,0.0001614921,0.00043584415,0.10970748,0.004235475,0.00022812762,0.000009387423,0.00014390057,0.7771552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97954774,0.00002791356,0.0040437416,0.00373326,0.0014740794,0.0000068425675,0.0000032406801,0.000011958076,0.011151226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971381,0.0013099817,0.0004913504,0.00017195923,0.00057210156,0.00031649627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981347,0.0006056858,0.0004277364,0.00017619743,0.00043930896,0.00021637401],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045476365,0.00009245052,0.00012717905,0.00007291752,0.0035922225,0.00048906595,0.00025622666,0.000107984575,0.0073818313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023658904,0.00008611785,0.000069406226,0.00052158,0.00034561343,0.0016084787,0.000033461336,0.0010545683,0.00023967198],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013837461,0.00018979193,0.0029557217,0.0000041614126,0.000015362144,0.000009130591,0.04592153,0.00000436771,0.0000918573,0.92018723,0.020919658,0.009687328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021378892,0.000019388552,0.00070213934,0.000031160285,0.000009499737,0.000036344358,0.018730307,0.000030385852,0.000042042164,0.025033144,0.9549979,0.0001538788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019800223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005239719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9340783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016431088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049809355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011356480","doi":"","title":"Regulatory Regime: Canada-Newfoundland/Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Board Issues","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Submarine pipeline; Petroleum; Oceanography; Environmental science; Fishery; Political science; Geology; Paleontology","score_opus":0.01570200130615071,"score_gpt":0.269986284124776,"score_spread":0.25428428281862525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011356480","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4714875,0.0031359042,0.0000335678,0.104410045,0.003299958,0.00020339082,0.00014021166,0.00009406962,0.41719535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94479436,0.0005157243,0.00009288104,0.0075350343,0.0041354937,0.0000010284847,0.0000034565173,0.000031344785,0.042890698],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974352,0.00017245463,0.0003369807,0.00023753507,0.00097074895,0.00084706466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857634,0.0000632289,0.00024598028,0.00029670386,0.0001394306,0.00067830435],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006499579,0.00018663173,0.0002710466,0.00006257332,0.0012935447,0.0003038756,0.00055634277,0.00013287246,0.0014089135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012016207,0.00018829646,0.00011680078,0.00027235268,0.0004051597,0.00039221608,0.00003568009,0.0004757642,0.000073927],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043818574,0.000027051476,0.019319253,0.0000061946544,0.000052751246,0.0007626743,0.0022218977,0.00005251173,0.0000154934,0.13346303,0.84224105,0.0017942984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032303415,0.00002569354,0.025153046,0.000047537895,0.000018567562,0.00020940808,0.00055252266,0.000006821545,0.000011375214,0.0017896378,0.97161937,0.00024299175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9964257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47330686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009507238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021057602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011379414","doi":"","title":"Oceans Act: Uncharted Seas For OffshoreDevelopment In Atlantic Canada?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Oceanography; International law; International waters; Law of the sea; Political science; Law; Territorial waters; Fishery; Public international law; Geology; Biology","score_opus":0.0250910467909934,"score_gpt":0.2907167739443897,"score_spread":0.26562572715339633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011379414","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36653894,0.00063281326,0.0009332688,0.1845792,0.0022463722,0.0010032672,0.00003721297,0.00010454719,0.44392437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950594,0.0005273367,0.00032114523,0.0013839207,0.00062856695,0.000006963176,0.000003020335,0.0000118042235,0.0020578685],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985543,0.000075393764,0.00026439104,0.00013048557,0.00038212817,0.0005933044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994291,0.00011152324,0.00009505709,0.00006839127,0.00008043088,0.00021551308],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056123885,0.000111049085,0.00018931493,0.000047897356,0.0014925703,0.00006303757,0.0002146822,0.000056268844,0.00013456571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011263288,0.0000925962,0.000053549436,0.00019571868,0.00015644592,0.0001102759,0.000030902593,0.00018348849,0.0000039152637],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021532984,0.00022741676,0.29975167,0.000033385044,0.0002880613,0.00071329647,0.07915871,0.000069741116,0.000012933176,0.24607484,0.35584491,0.01760971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004898894,0.000018768507,0.024876148,0.000033161094,0.000014117399,0.00003830425,0.006209384,0.00002080285,0.0000031642492,0.0026016273,0.9655382,0.00015645969],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6769365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9932642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6285204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045411827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011278953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011420462","doi":"","title":"Securing Assets of Oil and Gas ProjectsOffshore Nova Scotia","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Economic, financial, and policy analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Fossil fuel; Business; Petroleum engineering; Environmental science; Geology; Engineering; Waste management; Oceanography","score_opus":0.03012168449741693,"score_gpt":0.23854817854993235,"score_spread":0.20842649405251543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011420462","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8654191,0.0020637892,0.00020102035,0.00072126853,0.000341546,0.000030315066,0.00007371562,0.000015829959,0.13113345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951583,0.0027019808,0.00066154206,0.00028406517,0.00053807173,0.0000013290306,0.000006588952,0.00003092286,0.00061716035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839956,0.000020296646,0.00086228765,0.0002827836,0.00004190501,0.0003931907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988631,0.000045261022,0.00064803247,0.00025102566,0.000047692196,0.00014486234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006955928,0.00018339441,0.00057292136,0.00029725514,0.00021028961,0.00013643887,0.00023848473,0.00012349099,0.00042602903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005811361,0.00020517987,0.00019201847,0.00023373398,0.000120282006,0.00037660185,0.00006675127,0.0003062631,0.00015524229],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009180224,0.00029013064,0.39491752,0.00017176384,0.00051494903,0.00013393968,0.002677208,0.0002675282,0.00016485949,0.56543446,0.001761759,0.033574097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0043430277,0.00043570736,0.0965367,0.00029437573,0.0001809054,0.0022896198,0.0003770732,0.0023363912,0.0011458042,0.13312134,0.7571549,0.0017841745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003447631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005519708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7553931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005639611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030783718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8366992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011425559","doi":"","title":"After the Revolution: Being Pragmatic and Functional in Canada's TrialCourts and Courts of Appeal","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.020031224354271904,"score_gpt":0.23854932586225394,"score_spread":0.21851810150798204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011425559","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96695334,0.003132987,0.000047626225,0.015829917,0.000507684,0.00015703941,0.0000053083872,0.0000056014555,0.0133605255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99870336,0.00050917594,0.00005721091,0.00025552124,0.00034161663,0.0000030674,2.0095464e-7,0.0000037835018,0.00012604256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988758,0.00019248933,0.00024148358,0.00008836482,0.00039928666,0.0002026085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994538,0.00022067186,0.00010870157,0.000059339956,0.00005658711,0.000100910554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009843188,0.000063333464,0.00012862918,0.000024527382,0.0005389648,0.000065212465,0.00007282829,0.000031854168,0.00024880728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001145044,0.000046391597,0.000022777991,0.00007601056,0.00024570955,0.00019275484,0.000026486769,0.00018371228,9.828788e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013324536,0.0003434461,0.2869414,0.00041648233,0.00022926525,0.0012522592,0.10125692,0.00043204325,0.00022444637,0.45820576,0.060713068,0.08865247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035473404,0.00023749613,0.45425266,0.0012086026,0.00026981725,0.0018265729,0.02192992,0.0017567581,0.000025479505,0.046381872,0.4677785,0.0007849843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4904284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9544846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4640562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012069646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001850114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5129649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011448780","doi":"","title":"Du Dialogue au Monologue - Un Commentairesur I'arrêt R. v. Marshall","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023185370692789073,"score_gpt":0.265400114882008,"score_spread":0.2422147441892189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011448780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15967034,0.0053888527,0.000030515577,0.056560658,0.004767572,0.00014031853,0.00013623397,0.00006681398,0.7732387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9258045,0.01832512,0.0003031251,0.007846121,0.0067069544,0.000004404159,0.000023427361,0.000050263578,0.040936094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966361,0.0008922847,0.0006318148,0.00031326062,0.0006635256,0.0008629973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875045,0.00022794692,0.00024549584,0.00019922307,0.00018649148,0.00039036656],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011902736,0.0003139876,0.00036648347,0.000049698723,0.0031634227,0.00031572118,0.0008017254,0.0001651077,0.012843702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007590635,0.00029967006,0.00030143614,0.00022020996,0.0014079945,0.00067016116,0.00012939375,0.0007290106,0.003075385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102524675,0.0005823241,0.0055328226,0.000014687574,0.00047942242,0.00076315657,0.012654719,0.00010516293,0.000010518568,0.7795478,0.08190601,0.11830081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078049564,0.00018136985,0.006527332,0.00011504115,0.00007682024,0.00028844198,0.0009231263,0.000044256612,0.000027061827,0.009196431,0.9815075,0.00033214915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017240332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024808599,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89960146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045400567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001343537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011481634","doi":"","title":"Are Royalty Agreements Required ForCanada East Coast Offshore Oil And Gas","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Marine and Offshore Engineering Studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Submarine pipeline; Offshore oil and gas; Fossil fuel; East coast; Business; Petroleum; International law; Fishery; Geology; Law; Oceanography; Political science; Engineering; Paleontology; Waste management","score_opus":0.013063437442558478,"score_gpt":0.20700157660328022,"score_spread":0.19393813916072175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011481634","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9083887,0.0037690448,0.0013844449,0.0012275274,0.0022161123,0.00008942644,0.000055218585,0.0005049349,0.0823646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99500823,0.0020156573,0.0006322908,0.0001895341,0.00074973697,0.0000075555117,0.000008230759,0.00006727568,0.0013215041],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987494,0.000014790479,0.00031447326,0.00015730194,0.00028043598,0.00048364812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941915,0.000020002057,0.000078531564,0.00018000603,0.00006675094,0.0002355282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014923757,0.0002566821,0.00029780483,0.00007455688,0.00032207594,0.000109369976,0.00016616684,0.00006928231,0.00009164293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023006329,0.00023789243,0.00006705898,0.00013158344,0.000051740455,0.00017596234,0.00008442643,0.00034786086,0.0000103481325],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022128756,0.00025721543,0.17467232,0.0011669355,0.002446836,0.0064001773,0.0038864731,0.0579105,0.001470591,0.002831099,0.2542354,0.4945012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018041278,0.0000985095,0.033349536,0.00034109567,0.00011976306,0.0017685739,0.0010758594,0.012993639,0.00012151674,0.00036859518,0.9470568,0.0009020211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002902401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014944374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6928214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000069656446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010358997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9700971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011719764","doi":"","title":"Offshore Petroleum in Australia - Cooperative Governance in aSea of Federalism","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Natural Resources and Economic Development","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Submarine pipeline; Federalism; Petroleum; Oil spill; Political science; Geology; Petroleum engineering; Law; Oceanography; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.0300458452809575,"score_gpt":0.23561046335565497,"score_spread":0.20556461807469747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011719764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9463597,0.0010416422,0.000030896554,0.00032462704,0.00044312995,0.000093900955,0.00005299861,0.0000039802735,0.051649157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967381,0.00035296584,0.00051189,0.00021162817,0.000046843004,0.000005094165,0.0000037568418,0.0000159078,0.002113837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830467,0.000032160024,0.0009735385,0.00024919052,0.000051734252,0.0003886973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992876,0.000028554377,0.00042486264,0.00013925471,0.00002263265,0.00009706622],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007827767,0.00015819911,0.00048927293,0.0001314637,0.00008431668,0.000085628664,0.00021393223,0.000091190406,0.0012406994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000075862394,0.00016734005,0.00009110744,0.00018047697,0.000057605805,0.00027265746,0.00003021248,0.00044366476,0.000118866585],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006191057,0.00019070448,0.29282805,0.000024368615,0.000050503026,0.00009101218,0.0012686374,0.002432995,0.000025733572,0.70101,0.0015550222,0.00046105206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0049078856,0.00019458217,0.46786186,0.00018971183,0.000004790445,0.0001832583,0.0004628649,0.0007935786,0.00076003803,0.041100185,0.4827204,0.00082082883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013806748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042583705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65990984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027957215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003296458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011755897","doi":"","title":"The Thousandth Man: A Biography ofJames McGregor Stewart by Barry Cahill","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biography; Legal history; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.004559164335872751,"score_gpt":0.21361988693176007,"score_spread":0.20906072259588732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011755897","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09324336,0.017867193,0.00002309677,0.024662286,0.0021740051,0.00035251174,0.00017811032,0.00018891535,0.86131054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76468533,0.041658137,0.00024202476,0.010103769,0.0050667874,0.000029721356,0.000016225411,0.00011468967,0.17808332],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982474,0.0002505802,0.0002499058,0.00016293042,0.0005417887,0.0005474038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991312,0.00008807542,0.00010268144,0.0001968091,0.00007060847,0.0004106242],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082889793,0.00011192691,0.0001497722,0.00015002674,0.009009947,0.0015159908,0.0005194084,0.000109419845,0.003779259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025045654,0.00009953169,0.00022063279,0.00036315448,0.0014389069,0.0003453915,0.00001586284,0.00039771563,0.00023554977],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037397633,0.00005321422,0.00025119784,0.0000037999312,0.00007107737,0.00008473378,0.0089775,0.0000052683267,0.000024916457,0.018633764,0.88931865,0.08253851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021503543,0.00003059804,0.00023009002,0.000011748841,0.000023929038,0.00003012677,0.0014475759,0.0000017774635,0.000004912185,0.0012620452,0.9965968,0.00014535662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24766558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8726022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6832272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023131812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027364938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99952054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011774774","doi":"","title":"Walking the Centre Line: Balancing an Employee's Right to Privacy in Drug andAlcohol Policies in the Atlantic Offshore Oil Industry","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Right whale; Petroleum industry; Line (geometry); Business; Right to privacy; Submarine pipeline; Internet privacy; Law; Engineering; Political science; Computer science; Fishery","score_opus":0.018885409040244484,"score_gpt":0.29919442617670855,"score_spread":0.28030901713646406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011774774","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9534311,0.00024964512,0.000004954627,0.0078531355,0.00036821447,0.00016657797,0.000002451788,0.000023710814,0.03790016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965989,0.00006418973,0.000028456727,0.001826176,0.0012097288,0.000006098903,9.641994e-7,0.000016823871,0.00024865617],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970245,0.0010066425,0.00045351448,0.00019948902,0.000671643,0.0006442518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991405,0.00020419914,0.00016047429,0.00021156004,0.00010238883,0.0001809026],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033398194,0.00016479274,0.0002464754,0.00009692023,0.0015054704,0.00070837553,0.0007654651,0.00016539545,0.00007906199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004417242,0.000095073265,0.00006237414,0.00085317617,0.00015461793,0.00049117475,0.000047943802,0.00112896,0.000010500621],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029999519,0.00021152144,0.49698246,0.00003787645,0.000025694677,0.00032582282,0.40760282,0.00027877785,0.00015749014,0.08784066,0.0030230198,0.0034838787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011228584,0.0000807074,0.082293876,0.00079574436,0.000038555405,0.00021405579,0.116990946,0.000013589221,0.00036805178,0.009107233,0.78834665,0.00062770344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.078503184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37596008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7853237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013925706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027573918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011900156","doi":"","title":"Was Amerindian Dispossession Lawful? TheResponse of 19th-Century Maritime Intellectuals","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Colonialism, slavery, and trade","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Legal history; Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.013817810448962686,"score_gpt":0.28761396643765863,"score_spread":0.27379615598869594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011900156","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9082702,0.0005783746,0.000018306979,0.0015400025,0.0005470244,0.00015764339,0.00002686923,0.000054250402,0.08880733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947524,0.0025340903,0.00013341795,0.0004001509,0.0006801661,0.0000029544747,0.000003956239,0.000023948614,0.0014689099],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976896,0.00062832836,0.00040310473,0.00018999835,0.0005776529,0.00051130226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890965,0.00033770772,0.00016676955,0.00020010413,0.00008313759,0.00030265792],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010393871,0.0001608123,0.000289445,0.000088133274,0.0011535212,0.00018827827,0.00044874728,0.0001445204,0.011676531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012116996,0.00013849906,0.00019805375,0.00031553485,0.00060508645,0.00031420367,0.000034688805,0.0003983465,0.00015873832],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033475019,0.0016667244,0.0072069443,0.00006181628,0.00039066508,0.00096644997,0.3499744,0.00010306946,0.0025590658,0.044732966,0.007924374,0.581066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007207777,0.00018830606,0.0051359404,0.00011088698,0.00004478009,0.00010355603,0.0034310212,0.000010781092,0.0005804577,0.0028126854,0.9865959,0.00026487085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050518345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011024446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97867155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000088919245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002515172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98922694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011915343","doi":"","title":"Competition, Cooperation or Cartel: A NationalLaw School Accreditation Process for Canada?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Educational Practices and Policies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cartel; Accreditation; Competition (biology); Process (computing); Business; Competition law; Political science; International trade; Law; Industrial organization; Economics; Market economy; Computer science; Collusion","score_opus":0.03301970044027016,"score_gpt":0.3592491671544645,"score_spread":0.32622946671419434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011915343","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39014155,0.00032676445,0.0009047131,0.2207616,0.0035953466,0.0014775733,0.00034336775,0.00014017326,0.38230893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840362,0.0002019394,0.00039285896,0.005131331,0.003596207,0.000042682575,0.00008924352,0.000013514171,0.00649604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987975,0.00012278298,0.00024616582,0.00010481422,0.0005012247,0.00022752347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984593,0.00034562917,0.00013736753,0.000054750315,0.00080983643,0.00019312174],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005795732,0.0000781643,0.00009141975,0.000030771713,0.0023460349,0.00033297203,0.00016463289,0.000052805033,0.0045086527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041322137,0.00006871616,0.00003223472,0.0001782423,0.00008678903,0.0008519376,0.0000029087785,0.00016287775,0.000024768597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025878905,0.00016228248,0.0003718281,0.000036261492,0.0000704376,0.000008341652,0.015575064,0.0039209095,0.000028596107,0.83499825,0.14114293,0.0034262936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031826517,0.000039651426,0.00060936564,0.000020494104,0.000018603254,0.000038465612,0.0040213536,0.00011008014,0.000018604886,0.003957658,0.99073535,0.000112085014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26031312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9452518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84959245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022353817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043858048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99895275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011946407","doi":"","title":"Need Intellectual Property Be Everywhere?Against Ubiquity and Uniformity","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Property law; Political science; Law; Business; Economics; Property rights; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03940575782523388,"score_gpt":0.21123827419608204,"score_spread":0.17183251637084818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011946407","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39402622,0.00037912026,0.00018635868,0.0030649614,0.0006661821,0.0002576389,0.000003230467,0.00019631178,0.60121995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846245,0.0002907048,0.00010466391,0.008168153,0.0017215483,0.0000043224027,0.0000066782213,0.000048327714,0.005031071],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982103,0.00003211023,0.00046401672,0.00032507355,0.0004132739,0.00055519457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990888,0.00007640339,0.00019436539,0.0002516605,0.0003159484,0.00007279124],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005240452,0.00032293008,0.00033555788,0.0001840936,0.0012093286,0.0011567317,0.000406993,0.000092302966,0.012267277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037956034,0.00019051161,0.00013705644,0.00039414392,0.00024957675,0.0022689716,0.00035079927,0.0007035413,0.00069512177],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030853174,0.000506801,0.0013416273,0.00015399556,0.00017554613,0.00032499776,0.0015598779,0.000016738284,0.0013140469,0.0044333204,0.9034398,0.08642472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089188624,0.00006669886,0.0001737768,0.00006801739,0.000056854424,0.00036923966,0.0004128354,0.051699903,0.00019915713,0.0011465418,0.9444347,0.00048038692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00065216125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00097459933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5961889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005760164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016666474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011947477","doi":"","title":"The Dartmouth Schools Question and the Supreme Court ofNova Scotia","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Legal history; Nova scotia; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.012767360362670406,"score_gpt":0.2688707710326621,"score_spread":0.2561034106699917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011947477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23808461,0.01596336,0.028782278,0.31010017,0.008957543,0.00212299,0.0000468475,0.0004821426,0.39546004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99214804,0.0014216577,0.00028817914,0.0007670669,0.0033980638,0.0000027533852,0.0000010454875,0.000012860617,0.0019603255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803424,0.0005315642,0.00028867542,0.00013652822,0.0005892132,0.00041980235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905914,0.00023486502,0.000163859,0.00019342214,0.00015783247,0.00019086243],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038073377,0.00011297108,0.00015267586,0.00001931054,0.0046574376,0.0009791354,0.00045168932,0.00008763351,0.00011519968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001754558,0.00005553725,0.00008850561,0.00011915954,0.009142821,0.00051172473,0.000046275058,0.0004905898,0.00008185668],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047743084,0.00001672916,0.00065459026,0.0000010435797,0.000026119951,0.0000042347947,0.0051306775,0.000013421789,0.000012159571,0.98343384,0.004955993,0.005703423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016099806,0.000034385906,0.0005918101,0.000040035335,0.000059383987,0.00009801665,0.003610995,0.0001429868,0.000042613683,0.085976064,0.90762097,0.00017278014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016380196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03244675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90266496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007926808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013302063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99663836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012025403","doi":"","title":"The Allocation of Civil Liability for Damage to the Marine Environmentin the New Canadian Law of Merchant Shipping, or the PolluterPays How Much?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Liability; Legal liability; Delict; Business; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Comparative law; Commercial law; Private law; Black letter law","score_opus":0.026903066090188353,"score_gpt":0.2278815343358825,"score_spread":0.20097846824569415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012025403","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056956742,0.00043162773,0.028905727,0.6659137,0.0053126924,0.0041107927,0.00021333537,0.0000585373,0.23809688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909074,0.000052902302,0.00019426145,0.005987047,0.0010480742,0.000015440815,0.000007941722,0.000019220543,0.0017677642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987562,0.00007022363,0.00035856824,0.00014134504,0.00035644238,0.00031725323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870384,0.00036872734,0.00035011364,0.00039068412,0.00014637489,0.000040238912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019140983,0.00013838899,0.00014667153,0.000037118643,0.0011181462,0.00038080057,0.00082887115,0.000041364903,0.00025927136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006444904,0.00005424959,0.00012415981,0.00013956685,0.00038309456,0.0002592471,0.0001089227,0.00020088186,0.000007834974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000505129,0.000039024802,0.00063260127,0.000022981512,0.0000839163,0.000001481981,0.00032853807,0.00023445603,0.00011400198,0.9797712,0.016597388,0.0021238937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029872093,0.00002841187,0.004302731,0.000021626345,0.000073324336,0.0000083068935,0.0007429611,0.0007922066,0.00023716096,0.028319944,0.9650796,0.000095025214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049001057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.66795594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95145124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000062500694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009438049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9573317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012036314","doi":"","title":"Tax Discrimination in the NAFTA Bloc: The Impact of Tax and TradeAgreements on the Cross-Border Trade in Services","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International economics; International trade; Economics; Tax law; Business; Double taxation; Public economics","score_opus":0.017082089050273953,"score_gpt":0.3243138505622765,"score_spread":0.30723176151200254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012036314","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97450787,0.00014821175,0.000004428542,0.011463224,0.00006108683,0.00019971612,0.000004954405,0.0000065478516,0.01360396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965935,0.000031855987,0.000008473777,0.002717086,0.00053724606,0.000006244804,0.000004726874,0.00001026734,0.000090652735],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990117,0.000060283557,0.00031406406,0.00010515691,0.0003164257,0.0001923704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994032,0.00008354444,0.00032530972,0.00014725099,0.00003234039,0.000008404054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009115394,0.00012782495,0.00012393814,0.000096663534,0.0003204985,0.00063165,0.00031865196,0.000040363662,0.00023884187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003102207,0.00005540656,0.0000655258,0.00028502906,0.00009263747,0.00083148526,0.00003557253,0.00032706678,0.000008050518],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00077013666,0.0026685332,0.4929865,0.00035352935,0.00029574175,0.00008322143,0.06946546,0.012516841,0.0016804588,0.30585894,0.009184834,0.10413578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010968075,0.000035540743,0.9050411,0.00011139776,0.000025708563,0.000018009601,0.0039280215,0.0040148064,0.00005547164,0.0013184723,0.084219046,0.00013559271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006601752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018140394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4120546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023347187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008296532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012056615","doi":"","title":"A Comment on the Complementary Jurisdictionof the International Criminal Court: Adding Insult toInjury in Transitional Contexts?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insult; Criminal law; Law; Political science; Criminal court; International law; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.033026520056164986,"score_gpt":0.3080217081237147,"score_spread":0.27499518806754975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012056615","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37662145,0.000042511292,0.00030577145,0.3259446,0.0020653154,0.00040208857,0.00014059956,0.000040363342,0.29443732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9677172,0.000063813895,0.00007107023,0.029932318,0.0016279442,0.000019439858,0.000031070645,0.000010459116,0.00052671204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997802,0.00031955825,0.00039515094,0.00015065231,0.0010204618,0.0003121643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900097,0.0004424565,0.00015538538,0.00010913064,0.00020473912,0.00008733406],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015314876,0.00013082146,0.0001203144,0.00008862879,0.002714909,0.00036084268,0.0007011948,0.000047094225,0.005183886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026025436,0.00008006796,0.00012351341,0.000072790725,0.0003698982,0.00028404724,0.00003801031,0.00058068644,0.00006942871],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015567329,0.00017558679,0.00025821693,7.2680797e-7,0.000056732744,0.00005834438,0.0076035303,0.000046857178,0.0000091149095,0.97417754,0.01689231,0.00056539074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007948066,0.0000707448,0.0031790393,0.00006720866,0.000020697416,0.00009477038,0.0030263977,0.00013107777,0.000019492216,0.07253624,0.9199337,0.00012585285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022087237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021515409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90304136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036682392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011208829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99858344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012080886","doi":"","title":"Cooperative Environmental Assessments:Their Increasing Role in Oil and Gas Projects","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fossil fuel; Environmental law; Environmental planning; Business; Environmental science; Natural resource economics; Petroleum engineering; Environmental protection; Political science; Economics; Engineering; Law; Waste management","score_opus":0.012464701645400759,"score_gpt":0.26039234058547894,"score_spread":0.2479276389400782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012080886","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9433869,0.00011421888,0.000022757371,0.00023010946,0.00008963603,0.000081277496,0.000012106722,0.000017608221,0.05604537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965671,0.001474536,0.00064213463,0.00058730587,0.0001061039,0.0000110931405,0.000011282559,0.000031512787,0.00056897505],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981085,0.0002758411,0.00033729436,0.00031686603,0.00042271754,0.0005387704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937785,0.000054821176,0.00014044096,0.00014135748,0.0000020216428,0.00028349293],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005333332,0.00026481308,0.0002565763,0.000043476575,0.00060150697,0.00017176471,0.00020532416,0.00010184984,0.0015397818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001155199,0.00022682949,0.000057718964,0.00014643505,0.0003757513,0.00093398633,0.00029213575,0.0004696374,0.0001064253],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014310761,0.0007438717,0.8023922,0.000004237591,0.000047461745,0.0003364656,0.0037220973,0.00023541284,0.05232245,0.00011655011,0.000074835574,0.13986132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004748492,0.0008137534,0.92703646,0.00013961915,0.00006086264,0.0032277221,0.014510024,0.001886923,0.0025530204,0.003345775,0.04037467,0.001302664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001460182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015539589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13855864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057014206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013232091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99937296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012085502","doi":"","title":"The Law of Options","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02771607847675601,"score_gpt":0.2841747365592504,"score_spread":0.2564586580824944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012085502","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041932456,0.0017580991,0.00012254028,0.004885623,0.0014020399,0.0002249925,0.000011577352,0.000061437495,0.94960123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943514,0.0030339109,0.00032637527,0.00043101283,0.00051535707,0.0000053679687,4.5136e-7,0.000011067688,0.0013250925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998226,0.00028533663,0.0003320922,0.000108706525,0.0006616316,0.00038626723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916244,0.00010581652,0.00021287915,0.00023771099,0.0001615064,0.000119670374],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014707955,0.00008838377,0.00012994507,0.0000416557,0.0033148895,0.0002457122,0.000532163,0.000054573746,0.00044315483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038468927,0.00006514997,0.00017599574,0.00028308845,0.0010187034,0.00025200978,0.000048748567,0.00026228916,0.00006992709],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032124578,0.00007377458,0.0015158593,0.0000030688927,0.000052051473,0.000012963614,0.0027708013,0.000035215005,0.000009611409,0.9862374,0.0054258346,0.0038601756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023234694,0.00003306779,0.003742333,0.000016296635,0.000037237172,0.000010442728,0.002640356,0.000034812852,0.000020820697,0.022616664,0.9704994,0.00011623463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029139142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03142619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9650735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003872103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015305111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012108012","doi":"","title":"The Best Things in Law are Free?:Towards Quality Free Public Accessto Primary Legal Materials in Canada","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Quality (philosophy); Legal history; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04655171573101667,"score_gpt":0.338016501545715,"score_spread":0.2914647858146983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012108012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4091873,0.00012792404,0.0000022430884,0.26130322,0.0013214017,0.00016588107,0.000058833793,0.000019773932,0.32781345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834214,0.00021572913,0.0001198296,0.014199572,0.00062733586,0.000016488704,0.000009049552,0.0000143948455,0.0013761934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99665356,0.0010246544,0.0007379045,0.000181351,0.00085612223,0.0005464061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984182,0.00039200942,0.0003840702,0.00038222427,0.0002396709,0.0001838367],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044003925,0.00013256862,0.00022531893,0.00006412354,0.0019856687,0.0020940322,0.0012783546,0.00009842489,0.0021885638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010980824,0.00010666429,0.00003809804,0.0006817357,0.00032291183,0.0033725433,0.00008325536,0.0010151654,0.000022427217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075185235,0.0002366829,0.0062175626,0.000015266258,0.000027935479,0.00008781688,0.01053163,0.000013868981,0.00007936546,0.9429009,0.02903319,0.010780579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044687468,0.000008135344,0.01684744,0.00002858443,0.0000052279966,0.00002026072,0.010634987,8.1797464e-7,0.000046491117,0.009651117,0.9621429,0.000167202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99563587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99939644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9332498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011977106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071066623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012192475","doi":"","title":"An Empty Shell of a Treaty Promise:R. v. Marshall and the Rights of theNon-Status Indians","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Law; Political science; International law; Shell (structure); Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.0063400605361066545,"score_gpt":0.22924597838885433,"score_spread":0.22290591785274766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012192475","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7801668,0.0008797956,0.0000017283779,0.00037083277,0.00010225837,0.0001535405,0.00006445605,0.000009251287,0.21825133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99524134,0.0013390551,0.000069489644,0.00010074158,0.00020001095,0.0000019256097,0.000001512939,0.000007586614,0.0030383454],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882513,0.00028555046,0.00024278558,0.00009996232,0.00029542213,0.00025116606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993371,0.00006478256,0.00015145954,0.00014859864,0.00006335453,0.00023475416],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068774336,0.0000683595,0.00019909539,0.000099715406,0.0013099182,0.000177476,0.00024717202,0.00007310639,0.002207548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014244384,0.00005349925,0.00009149442,0.00012895546,0.001841951,0.0002449774,0.000008302635,0.00018868137,0.000008222708],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010937214,0.00063849275,0.0035674884,0.00007315643,0.00026375894,0.00017511324,0.5509621,0.000042940646,0.00026032096,0.3109797,0.0065751467,0.12536812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00185035,0.0001249904,0.0065218573,0.00004254692,0.000082599,0.00004508741,0.0021115774,0.000012713864,0.000025840687,0.01762073,0.97141564,0.00014604769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55275506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.919028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96484053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010151658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034215962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012254562","doi":"","title":"Same-Sex Partners And Family Class Immigration: Still Not EqualWith Opposite-Sex Partners","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Class (philosophy); Political science; Demographic economics; Psychology; Gender studies; Sociology; Law; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.06380435913512152,"score_gpt":0.35932297326192475,"score_spread":0.29551861412680325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012254562","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47815743,0.0001999172,0.002849472,0.02508865,0.001075844,0.00039231786,0.000038263992,0.00023973572,0.49195835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896502,0.0003150765,0.00063533307,0.00551683,0.0006047436,0.000007667846,0.000011393031,0.0000238423,0.003234933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744403,0.0003106235,0.00046333089,0.00029697004,0.000899661,0.0005853777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875706,0.000107554246,0.00022575747,0.00018394296,0.0001708528,0.0005548362],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014290366,0.00020999231,0.00028117464,0.000084878004,0.0014691217,0.00074907864,0.0003096784,0.00016478209,0.00013442755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008936248,0.00018935099,0.00011674388,0.00023365501,0.0006865955,0.00075097586,0.000054986132,0.000369418,0.000068481306],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005182377,0.00012749346,0.0006304011,0.000012205026,0.00005448344,0.00006904065,0.053223174,0.00023290172,0.00033975524,0.93558294,0.001853209,0.007822574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028196794,0.00031063237,0.0032668046,0.000106207415,0.000121861995,0.000067741224,0.052738678,0.00008748987,0.0008766921,0.036301058,0.9024459,0.00085722655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004426444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018538976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90059274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018151777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002779064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012301177","doi":"","title":"International Royalty and Continental Shelf Limits: Emerging Issues for theCanadian Offshore","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Submarine pipeline; Continental shelf; International law; Business; Oceanography; Geology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.009578929449218981,"score_gpt":0.25300412625238916,"score_spread":0.24342519680317018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012301177","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49084017,0.00038778334,0.0005970764,0.0070786844,0.0018940879,0.0003885899,0.00010525552,0.00006161488,0.49864674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895198,0.000086526656,0.0055336817,0.00093207933,0.0003654112,0.0000110648225,0.00001559758,0.000028862929,0.0035069832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987655,0.00004845411,0.00027479866,0.00023162267,0.00036049637,0.00031911975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994807,0.0000748642,0.00011239123,0.00010262233,0.000041525214,0.00018787882],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040008995,0.00015319024,0.00014589999,0.00003794844,0.00041192817,0.000204818,0.00028459894,0.000058053905,0.0047591627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012814686,0.00014235577,0.0000753065,0.00005093304,0.00017546605,0.00038522153,0.000059124122,0.00018351446,0.000070833456],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025365196,0.0004664633,0.33496296,0.000032050244,0.00048473396,0.00030040907,0.0048053474,0.0008451152,0.0067486884,0.5324611,0.08047742,0.03816207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006852869,0.00006788223,0.009111223,0.000025227164,0.000017647955,0.0003864629,0.00033035627,0.00052958075,0.0016846186,0.005497592,0.9814482,0.00021594537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015296484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060040033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90097076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014252294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000103687225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012328936","doi":"","title":"Offshore Seismic and Fisheries and Environmental Issues - How Can They beReconciled?: A Case Study on the Public Review on the Effects of Potential Oil and GasExploration Offshore Cape Breton","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Submarine pipeline; Fishery; Cape; Oceanography; Environmental science; Geology; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02373222435029317,"score_gpt":0.2604183396831194,"score_spread":0.2366861153328262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012328936","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91410774,0.007538899,0.00000127945,0.07631523,0.00011423155,0.00031426584,0.000016074993,0.000008374142,0.0015838797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95692295,0.041252054,0.0000057286156,0.0014349474,0.00014654237,0.000021447613,9.4276623e-7,0.000011815593,0.00020359455],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980268,0.0009989664,0.00019034189,0.00018136529,0.00035834598,0.00024420905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916476,0.00036040772,0.00018971419,0.00014446389,0.000024564873,0.000116059804],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010273436,0.00017398897,0.0002620021,0.000026616846,0.0022851094,0.00020161046,0.00010275392,0.00004963526,0.000026176609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002912932,0.00009155544,0.000046256213,0.00006196267,0.00080027594,0.0001720306,0.000053196938,0.0002680326,5.887807e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016785807,0.0013006533,0.051094268,0.0010841388,0.0015706235,0.0027583903,0.7061745,0.0000029152002,0.00020804278,0.07831838,0.036824934,0.12049532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024019708,0.0032024118,0.0139196925,0.002006671,0.0009567637,0.0048061498,0.83862805,0.000050030245,0.00023510517,0.0066071795,0.126238,0.00094799156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014882623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012247219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13245356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039239752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004157843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012354532","doi":"","title":"A Brief Overview of the Enforceability of ForumSelection, Choice of Law, and Arbitration Clausesand the Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniensunder the Admiralty Law of the United States","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Doctrine; Political science; Arbitration; Choice of law; Conflict of laws","score_opus":0.02923647036956558,"score_gpt":0.26739498107832077,"score_spread":0.23815851070875518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012354532","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94542,0.00017137191,0.0001279564,0.004589169,0.00025499755,0.0005642968,0.000021084268,0.000009213223,0.048841897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883535,0.00011035509,0.000013778477,0.011348186,0.000104609666,0.0000038787753,0.000007989744,0.0000108279555,0.00004686743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849737,0.00008090036,0.00071322,0.000098982804,0.00046057816,0.00014894271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975712,0.00017291807,0.0012184543,0.0002663764,0.0007603756,0.0000107030755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007105762,0.00012379921,0.00022399086,0.00004579205,0.00037207102,0.000053786473,0.00035954974,0.00004700794,0.00008890092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008837038,0.000058014048,0.0001609171,0.00043495535,0.00070330565,0.00046369,0.00011361781,0.00021198297,3.533923e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010310709,0.00013303028,0.011707349,0.00014875528,0.00009995233,1.3409765e-7,0.00026854905,0.000428848,0.0019879648,0.984742,0.00034390195,0.000036444286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0057773395,0.0003786801,0.14207543,0.0009790701,0.00074956485,0.00008677285,0.0018684148,0.018730583,0.079435825,0.20723571,0.5422191,0.00046352056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010763303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011039482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77750623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016469145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003814394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012443271","doi":"","title":"Marshalling Principles fromThe Marshall Morass","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Marshalling; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.03938617419903775,"score_gpt":0.21970783468711577,"score_spread":0.18032166048807802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012443271","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42211547,0.0010509565,0.00088671956,0.0005033907,0.0005677421,0.00008109944,0.00012867544,0.000053456442,0.5746125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98948205,0.0008208976,0.0017845404,0.0009551965,0.00068233366,0.0000067675,0.000013971575,0.000034084675,0.006220175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842566,0.000029271805,0.0008000547,0.0002999221,0.000033414948,0.00041168267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999138,0.000043052256,0.0002825682,0.00033036614,0.000021214684,0.00018479546],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008739804,0.0001780463,0.00034864026,0.00010184141,0.00071816304,0.00025729337,0.00043439615,0.00011694174,0.018210618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029631787,0.00019474847,0.00020027113,0.00009897226,0.00014108005,0.0006214167,0.000040133473,0.0004290502,0.004499034],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019503892,0.00007766432,0.0033653558,0.0000056704275,0.00006542443,0.000034054083,0.0002602783,0.002163798,0.000009775012,0.99132156,0.0003242289,0.0023526936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005684488,0.00003735765,0.002626578,0.000026894586,0.000008693481,0.00026940205,0.000053644755,0.0010716163,0.00004466993,0.20522061,0.78977585,0.0002962524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017205249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020129813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7894516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010363887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023043653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012459786","doi":"","title":"Breach of Contract?: The New Economy, Access to Justice and theEthical Responsibilities of the Legal Profession","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Economic Justice; Law; Business; Breach of contract; Professional responsibility; Legal service; Political science; Damages","score_opus":0.06586348626266146,"score_gpt":0.38859037400642776,"score_spread":0.3227268877437663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012459786","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12231628,0.0001953182,0.000095181116,0.73267716,0.0008440967,0.00029560452,0.0000064484925,0.000009422674,0.14356047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897238,0.000059696664,0.00017766823,0.006949513,0.00037757296,0.0000024713909,1.8302349e-7,0.000004809483,0.002704279],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849814,0.0006716443,0.00033523937,0.00008083133,0.0002615964,0.00015255358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981059,0.0010073484,0.000343459,0.0001692336,0.00026914597,0.00010490215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002091386,0.00005773201,0.00011711791,0.000036485995,0.00122055,0.0003217414,0.00042879657,0.00006191307,0.00057590986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001625674,0.000032422882,0.000043295928,0.00028939248,0.00038087086,0.0008211872,0.00007201461,0.00065601536,0.0000035190924],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049152994,0.00009121985,0.0006340616,0.000015479603,0.000020669073,5.184062e-7,0.0914943,0.00001014299,0.0001128845,0.8632845,0.03718162,0.00710545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029464028,0.000065798464,0.0072508943,0.00007724543,0.00005887024,0.000039675244,0.028366221,0.000021649581,0.00025362635,0.013735931,0.9497489,0.00008659471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008534638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009563113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91256726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036008187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007341327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012536637","doi":"","title":"Canadian Law Teachers in the 1930s: \"When the World was TurnedUpside Down\"","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Legal education","score_opus":0.030949882436189496,"score_gpt":0.332850534060498,"score_spread":0.3019006516243085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012536637","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01220781,0.00007273133,0.000006533824,0.42537585,0.00065528246,0.00013126366,0.000003462249,0.000013201249,0.56153387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9528639,0.000022960698,0.00026450623,0.04270627,0.0010595921,0.000011538106,0.0000032841176,0.000009623286,0.003058377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825335,0.00048010392,0.0002718016,0.00010946474,0.00044408982,0.0004412016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901915,0.0003152849,0.00013971057,0.00020907707,0.00011571649,0.00020106538],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030134185,0.000094021365,0.00008656064,0.00010968322,0.0031891633,0.0011621009,0.0006948298,0.000063612875,0.0010037714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003217951,0.00005720468,0.000060150764,0.0007405083,0.00035656613,0.00081846956,0.000013331312,0.001489856,0.00013756438],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024385965,0.000036997215,0.00040011897,4.331281e-7,0.000011074646,0.000021478936,0.120120876,0.00006615755,0.0000027529384,0.85980076,0.018796679,0.000740249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018096798,0.000007652381,0.0010271176,0.000012544994,0.000011866576,0.00004457829,0.02982789,5.655439e-7,0.00000598114,0.050080474,0.9187168,0.0000835511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93153906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99811244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94065607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056593574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023538633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013196746","doi":"","title":"The Animal Protection Commission: Advancing Social Membershipfor Animals through a Novel Administrative Agency","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Agency (philosophy); Administrative law; Public administration; Political science; Business; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.10603367940154422,"score_gpt":0.33789022780219635,"score_spread":0.23185654840065212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013196746","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8114772,0.000090072994,0.008157074,0.02391253,0.00054646016,0.0003790149,0.000009401762,0.00010330967,0.15532495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99587274,0.0000108471495,0.0016383732,0.0011788718,0.0005674361,0.000012050375,8.7985444e-7,0.000012799924,0.0007060268],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986712,0.00014282732,0.0003152914,0.00019677008,0.00031213896,0.00036179565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940014,0.0000633641,0.00025855447,0.00012843167,0.000053643318,0.0000958611],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005335567,0.00014443835,0.00013344789,0.0000095653795,0.0040713917,0.00012875733,0.00029690692,0.000099478406,0.0021568763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009909933,0.00009902008,0.00009701164,0.00018276206,0.00084224733,0.00040626593,0.00010099397,0.00037707321,0.00018678495],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004926497,0.0015719848,0.032754477,0.00005211838,0.00085996307,0.0002855842,0.072471626,0.00009030613,0.4319795,0.21468732,0.18151166,0.05880896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011630881,0.0011802877,0.103582904,0.00003538509,0.0001126489,0.00092036417,0.004678422,0.0005519036,0.013225185,0.011827908,0.8622463,0.00047564757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021295997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032167803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6807346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000100479534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004152491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013925780","doi":"","title":"Duets, Not Solos: The McLachlin Court’s Co-Authorship Legacy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0811891587362291,"score_gpt":0.4052365622287247,"score_spread":0.32404740349249556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013925780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032028884,0.000060057257,0.0004949405,0.38668618,0.0035761427,0.00017275967,0.000009576875,0.00008809656,0.5768834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97187734,0.000047859834,0.00054661906,0.015092984,0.0061581153,0.000006251853,0.0000041780054,0.000016157825,0.0062505035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997772,0.0006664875,0.00034840347,0.00014817987,0.00062879955,0.00043612596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981573,0.00048368136,0.00030093416,0.0002383286,0.000597735,0.00022201674],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040651555,0.00011092968,0.00011803125,0.00006734708,0.0055605965,0.0016604263,0.0005748703,0.00012686683,0.0040493417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012525935,0.000080000835,0.00007896461,0.000422276,0.00095595594,0.0014976477,0.000027871392,0.0011908584,0.0010562517],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003517814,0.000101546495,0.00048341966,0.0000018109206,0.000036851154,0.000008933446,0.044317752,0.0000013015338,0.000107910535,0.8099575,0.14138196,0.0035658157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001741232,0.00004173881,0.0010419672,0.000009509377,0.00002300063,0.000060293965,0.008815261,0.0000121319,0.00021343333,0.008062108,0.9814264,0.0001200436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056601726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014743382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9398484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010640699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009965061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013950883","doi":"","title":"A Reply to Professor Pothier's Review of Power Without Law: TheSupreme Court of Canada, the Marshall Decisions and theFailure of Judicial Activism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Judicial activism; Power (physics); Judicial review; Judicial opinion","score_opus":0.01866275446483642,"score_gpt":0.2886034032387778,"score_spread":0.2699406487739414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013950883","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4478417,0.009174291,0.00007570244,0.16777539,0.0019549523,0.0014080834,0.00023541444,0.000021500839,0.37151295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940564,0.0016215664,0.0002358662,0.003784514,0.00020713109,0.0000059552935,3.7456786e-7,0.000006675814,0.000081513965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824655,0.0001751853,0.0004395114,0.00012271327,0.0007778316,0.0002382257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984109,0.0003395827,0.00038889897,0.0001715387,0.00055220997,0.00013691654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016935995,0.00010540262,0.00037466706,0.000020708498,0.0009878748,0.000017712346,0.00036143465,0.000055537133,0.0001381529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008390439,0.000065625194,0.00008889521,0.00017735855,0.0010504802,0.00010319578,0.0001048283,0.00035996872,7.383808e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001018684,0.00009479604,0.0018287755,0.000058718015,0.00016155587,0.000009565937,0.005412666,0.0000011727701,0.0008222494,0.974652,0.014965807,0.00189084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047551777,0.00018209276,0.018769294,0.0033457184,0.0001941941,0.00006913356,0.005209129,8.784545e-7,0.00049104984,0.063083984,0.9079075,0.00027151153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40768433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88595265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.911568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029068786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010231314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7598034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014058336","doi":"","title":"The Constitutionality of Classification: IndigenousOverrepresentation and Security Policy in CanadianFederal Penitentiaries","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Law; Political science; Supreme court","score_opus":0.0364788672087247,"score_gpt":0.3479918036845599,"score_spread":0.3115129364758352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014058336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6972732,0.00065298146,0.00013165433,0.01863814,0.0011173349,0.0002922704,0.000053594307,0.000022190956,0.28181866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984663,0.00019816175,0.00003523567,0.00033967567,0.0008510203,0.0000015648565,0.0000026049213,0.0000027342849,0.00010269962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885005,0.00029250758,0.00023221862,0.00009088188,0.00031399864,0.00022034982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992383,0.00017638234,0.00015577537,0.00008560978,0.00022378413,0.00012013893],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013138356,0.0000524562,0.000085349086,0.00004234898,0.0028681501,0.00022269889,0.00015386869,0.0000872222,0.000052923064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003279625,0.000042220327,0.000028712393,0.00014802405,0.0032515116,0.00024839188,0.000019250803,0.00024955225,0.0000015531837],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001439443,0.000014486459,0.037061773,0.0000026710188,0.000009346768,0.0000027518558,0.026023889,6.793896e-7,0.000009673689,0.9359602,0.00023505636,0.00066508504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048199864,0.00003925224,0.2474378,0.000023007451,0.000014679905,0.000046148,0.02047361,0.00003061372,0.000061028415,0.24156152,0.48968837,0.00014198945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21382211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91106004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6972379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010614729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010434752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3030605442","doi":"","title":"Child Pornography in Canada and the United States:The Myth of Right Answers","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Pornography; Political science; Law; Child pornography; History; The Internet; Computer science","score_opus":0.008716514021694842,"score_gpt":0.24623540295955768,"score_spread":0.23751888893786283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3030605442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97958076,0.0007472458,0.000017784902,0.006013526,0.0004895259,0.00014931566,0.000037272097,0.000017816574,0.012946782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969749,0.00006984811,0.00001861963,0.0026619302,0.00008353301,0.0000067887577,0.000018522218,0.000015927939,0.0001499192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858326,0.00028419937,0.00043743834,0.0001477202,0.0002042952,0.00034311326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991886,0.00015880138,0.00022584309,0.00032142742,0.00005643284,0.00004886867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054319476,0.00013561825,0.0002397151,0.00017463998,0.00028313693,0.000025663094,0.00034490725,0.00008814549,0.00016074757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000071972236,0.000076889846,0.000053966596,0.00052057736,0.0006616977,0.000034623943,0.000035380832,0.0006458252,0.0000013021912],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005034159,0.0003973614,0.35698724,0.000012095805,0.00026302884,0.0007751102,0.0051671243,0.00016541504,0.000029890396,0.6033393,0.028513411,0.003846572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008125969,0.0001691985,0.3458871,0.00004251226,0.00015562109,0.0024194072,0.011063367,0.0000550713,0.00020119708,0.020161698,0.61132956,0.00038931528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96809894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9723187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5831776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004516258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006458704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3135477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095548731","doi":"","title":"Sharing the Spotlight: Co-authored Reasons on theModern Supreme Court of Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; International law","score_opus":0.05341429243685371,"score_gpt":0.28208366399481694,"score_spread":0.22866937155796324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3095548731","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062333208,0.000094008974,0.000018624616,0.002454966,0.00045780744,0.000053204814,0.000026035152,0.000015686835,0.9345465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933896,0.00013120592,0.000085404754,0.00068649574,0.00032713465,8.785751e-7,9.4732235e-7,0.000013110779,0.005365198],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986665,0.00013387993,0.00021819923,0.000114091825,0.00061154494,0.0002557794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992737,0.000096901735,0.00016035546,0.00014594806,0.00021852233,0.00010455043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007392768,0.00008573674,0.00012326255,0.000017137258,0.0012782397,0.000052488456,0.0005179495,0.00002561367,0.00043147345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014135629,0.000056490724,0.00006959316,0.00006405773,0.00025191164,0.00009443829,0.000052747706,0.00023367326,0.000017427019],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039552364,0.00004791839,0.002556502,0.000002165681,0.00008392039,0.00006905096,0.010486285,0.0000071426393,0.00004237982,0.96750945,0.01887074,0.00028491864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029809072,0.00006258581,0.017274715,0.00007912204,0.00003240968,0.00004812294,0.0043983557,0.000027941067,0.0013985264,0.017077988,0.9591212,0.00018094535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21280338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7839181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95043147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009876276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026888316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9831315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095817822","doi":"","title":"The Justiciability of Climate Change: AComparison ofUS and Canadian Approaches","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Climate change; Political science; Law; Politics; Ecology","score_opus":0.10632420175792745,"score_gpt":0.2872782956223335,"score_spread":0.18095409386440603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3095817822","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47590998,0.0006373244,0.0000046761093,0.0016211491,0.0003183913,0.00019565113,0.000030899097,0.00001141305,0.5212705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998272,0.001033354,0.00015702267,0.0001828249,0.00029923185,0.0000036977854,6.726889e-7,0.000005953464,0.000045216944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990601,0.0001682954,0.00016422749,0.000078662226,0.00016171648,0.0003670278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994452,0.000058795977,0.00009736661,0.000102355116,0.000013449297,0.00028280338],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009665277,0.00006476716,0.00010318576,0.000018563953,0.0016206424,0.00005006637,0.00019618125,0.00005969736,0.000086095344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027377677,0.00004582481,0.000037691927,0.000053934044,0.00072225096,0.0001341097,0.000035832447,0.00016337204,0.000008810725],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023297805,0.00005790924,0.0990851,0.000014083532,0.000021751963,0.000006772618,0.0443988,6.336449e-7,0.0000069105577,0.8219179,0.00013467499,0.034332193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045578863,0.00017854974,0.48404267,0.00004494528,0.00011312907,0.000042892934,0.022871766,0.000043773976,0.00017877524,0.020990573,0.4706873,0.00034983113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36721492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8420521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8009273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058246904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053552292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3096069643","doi":"","title":"Offshore Oil and Gas Facility Decommissioningin Nova Scotia and Newfoundland","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Marine and Offshore Engineering Studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Submarine pipeline; Fossil fuel; Environmental science; Geology; Oceanography; Petroleum engineering; Fishery; Engineering; Waste management","score_opus":0.010851699323385656,"score_gpt":0.2212485611980949,"score_spread":0.21039686187470927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3096069643","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94719565,0.004348325,0.0022429558,0.0004887504,0.00064564333,0.00003380956,0.000011897989,0.00023239006,0.044800576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944974,0.0035359568,0.0011085354,0.000057679794,0.00027499424,0.0000010914184,0.0000050078133,0.000028250473,0.00049105234],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913055,0.000014571486,0.00023580933,0.0001463146,0.00014424516,0.0003285172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954176,0.000050418243,0.000025503568,0.00013273844,0.000037120084,0.00021243817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019955766,0.0002116852,0.00024767526,0.00006610394,0.00022361116,0.000149612,0.0000910572,0.00007170953,0.00014074723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026970032,0.00018359358,0.000040361374,0.00009721022,0.000073787916,0.0001657461,0.00007605897,0.00037767488,0.000012230722],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008207826,0.00007979898,0.3254496,0.0004445595,0.0005171543,0.0006736509,0.0021586644,0.0092860665,0.0007930277,0.0020697333,0.011482645,0.64696306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020407937,0.00015082296,0.09732737,0.00023943014,0.00012357916,0.00534257,0.00028546597,0.015962847,0.00014469496,0.0010240998,0.8762945,0.0010638628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032075236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003513173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86481184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003298681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007309323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7486729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107164542","doi":"","title":"Anatomy of a Liquefied Natural Gas Receiving Terminal inAtlantic Canada-an Overview of the Legal and RegulatoryHurdles","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Marine and Offshore Engineering Studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terminal (telecommunication); Medicine; Anatomy; Engineering","score_opus":0.009229525187571613,"score_gpt":0.24026904033106733,"score_spread":0.23103951514349572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107164542","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937123,0.0038364101,0.00005788726,0.00007523656,0.00046081102,0.00005611708,0.00000402472,0.000024529545,0.0017726816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991743,0.00027755718,0.00031643352,0.000035868252,0.00013632767,5.3843075e-7,7.3473956e-7,0.000020464164,0.00003776671],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905163,0.000021893484,0.0003543093,0.00008141462,0.000251334,0.00023939295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995416,0.00006010186,0.00009005307,0.00016409846,0.00007028552,0.00007386847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034430836,0.00014340797,0.00026416854,0.00005442943,0.000111929585,0.000020531621,0.00018424573,0.000042881053,0.000011180493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031337117,0.0001047794,0.000060328963,0.0001308801,0.00007113998,0.0001222107,0.00006239508,0.00033604086,5.3215345e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005984567,0.0005080835,0.2275003,0.011675096,0.0045859674,0.0028888825,0.01428149,0.030245917,0.04816389,0.2486167,0.015672304,0.3952629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014148349,0.00018801744,0.8771451,0.0013077209,0.00027608016,0.0032596323,0.0008343932,0.007917227,0.021646481,0.0006560234,0.08444253,0.0009119336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023227975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34641188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6496448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056801462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058792968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9832764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110983583","doi":"","title":"Damages for Mental Distress and Other Intangible Loss in aCommercial Context","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Leadership, Behavior, and Decision-Making Studies","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Context (archaeology); Mental distress; Distress; Law and economics; Psychology; Law; Business; Mental health; Political science; Psychiatry; Sociology; Psychotherapist; History","score_opus":0.11150989828357442,"score_gpt":0.40240511445143157,"score_spread":0.29089521616785713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110983583","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98249745,0.0016064474,0.0012139045,0.0075113736,0.0009816977,0.00031472978,0.00019743753,0.00003025603,0.005646693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961431,0.00004666089,0.0009927049,0.0015083427,0.0006077914,0.000009527658,0.0000017122971,0.000021647995,0.0006685189],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99751914,0.00013957632,0.0007161609,0.00035529543,0.0008455356,0.00042427797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99816096,0.0010282918,0.00024039291,0.00025859088,0.00015930309,0.00015243576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018744137,0.00019928924,0.00040410488,0.0002057743,0.000685143,0.00059964583,0.00055627327,0.000095793446,0.00031650913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004503946,0.00013802339,0.00014616286,0.00023575503,0.00034242048,0.0005379242,0.0001661555,0.00029399002,0.000052865493],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006008978,0.00050309784,0.14375323,0.000007172813,0.000062154184,0.00013307396,0.025889935,0.00005820448,0.00022213781,0.018554091,0.043978825,0.7662372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004873458,0.00028002638,0.026785009,0.00017315791,0.000045562985,0.000477125,0.02797994,0.00026526907,0.0006790672,0.023659246,0.91420686,0.00057526404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012636672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009617276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87022805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007199551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027035065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57823986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3113476506","doi":"","title":"\"We Shall Not Cease From Exploration\": Narratives fromthe Hyde Inquiry about Mental Health and Criminal Justice","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Mental health; Criminal justice; Criminology; Psychology; Economic Justice; Criminal law; Sociology; Political science; Law; Psychotherapist; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06584618676533893,"score_gpt":0.3550053466275127,"score_spread":0.2891591598621738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3113476506","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8353028,0.0023778342,0.0010606111,0.011262037,0.14044017,0.00033328438,0.00026211553,0.00012630984,0.008834817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96902174,0.00031019308,0.007185076,0.008879493,0.014059592,0.000025387902,0.0001394491,0.000120720266,0.0002583533],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967037,0.00043306287,0.00085260405,0.0006754093,0.00053848675,0.00079675275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99756634,0.00018351033,0.0006519564,0.0005707332,0.00009124978,0.00093622546],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071010203,0.0004544753,0.00051396526,0.00018093568,0.0013734747,0.00032681058,0.0004891554,0.00023459534,0.0013553709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005803827,0.0004139411,0.00013338568,0.00016095306,0.0005399825,0.00076505804,0.000105286825,0.0015930136,0.00024325447],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019451197,0.0009856527,0.0012263955,0.00008671149,0.00046102924,0.00029165074,0.6091547,0.0000050006606,0.009258154,0.054699868,0.29753163,0.024354097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011634843,0.0024153267,0.013580226,0.00055168825,0.0004912086,0.0039980207,0.4810047,0.00019281555,0.0003529653,0.023109507,0.46064097,0.0020277563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045760098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002024364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16310933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000072978124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015151552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114913787","doi":"","title":"Alex M. Cameron, Power Without Law. The Supreme Courtof Canada, .the Marshall Decisions, and the Failure ofJudicial Activism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.012217173374166387,"score_gpt":0.252947511472747,"score_spread":0.24073033809858063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3114913787","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46974656,0.0018771663,0.0000961225,0.2597215,0.0035857449,0.0007030555,0.000068005626,0.000044986857,0.26415685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920204,0.00028472938,0.000039991763,0.0059323492,0.001474705,0.000010271839,7.8498596e-7,0.000010393361,0.00022635121],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977221,0.0003510748,0.00027867663,0.00017306092,0.0010201423,0.00045496886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829173,0.0008875669,0.00019265543,0.00020873144,0.00025302818,0.0001662722],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018729208,0.0001666154,0.0002353718,0.0000142145145,0.009143022,0.00034888502,0.0006885608,0.00009177671,0.0002500647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040884904,0.000075832075,0.00009950608,0.00014554521,0.0044539473,0.00018739354,0.00015855859,0.0010161841,0.000010322673],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008106588,0.000020056126,0.001477648,4.0205936e-7,0.00010657299,0.00002019588,0.0042967293,0.0000028650816,0.000044530803,0.96810603,0.024281258,0.0015626553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006247705,0.000016688855,0.00713412,0.00002045447,0.00007512739,0.00012599955,0.007554187,0.000006193756,0.0000106310235,0.058249407,0.9260283,0.00015408486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8141506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9098566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006853942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082893553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3119009318","doi":"","title":"Physicians' Attitudes, Concerns, and Procedural Understandingof Medical Aid-in-Dying in Vermont","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medical law; Medicine; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0935724053911631,"score_gpt":0.4043741061348529,"score_spread":0.31080170074368985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3119009318","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98605263,0.002690431,0.00022573263,0.0019632226,0.00023362685,0.00013667875,0.000004035337,0.000018679275,0.008674955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957361,0.0012544047,0.0005129585,0.0016777546,0.0007617095,0.000002109099,0.0000031596035,0.000016626474,0.00003516504],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986785,0.00004776338,0.00036335125,0.00016719053,0.00044292718,0.00030027202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994512,0.00008640101,0.000115754025,0.00009476539,0.00008942551,0.00016245779],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038337114,0.00012926743,0.00037915373,0.00010138969,0.00008695965,0.000021478027,0.00009855393,0.00010218611,0.0001012463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014913484,0.00010759552,0.000047604488,0.00017210493,0.00035393698,0.00013904876,0.000043318654,0.00041369614,0.0000050169137],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011109456,0.0005191055,0.9387214,0.00050291605,0.00023488319,0.002122492,0.023752194,0.0000063275083,0.0034570473,0.009697738,0.0042556166,0.01561932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.07397369,0.007159322,0.48077282,0.078755684,0.0006099172,0.0044900863,0.043633685,0.0050895074,0.029191611,0.009756992,0.26384082,0.0027258473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040003564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038259134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4579486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015103626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015109597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43876183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120103928","doi":"","title":"Greg Taylor, The Law of the Land: The Advent of the Torrens Systemin Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.010720941328888657,"score_gpt":0.17195426951076315,"score_spread":0.1612333281818745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120103928","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.979754,0.00034283448,3.801229e-7,0.014181325,0.0011586745,0.00018807409,0.000056457782,0.0000046554774,0.004313653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99770033,0.000092013084,9.576455e-7,0.00064692384,0.00045363602,0.0000017253759,0.0000011872896,9.0509394e-7,0.0011022901],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988658,0.00013204833,0.00027822267,0.000077090044,0.00044821657,0.00019864638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993711,0.00009932286,0.00027809886,0.0001292274,0.00007480327,0.000047413803],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028810452,0.00009639853,0.0001478078,0.0000013662032,0.0016218185,0.00002294178,0.0007970844,0.000045944813,0.00007046792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000079256915,0.000008985123,0.00017901316,0.00013308784,0.00034538403,0.000036416015,0.000104471095,0.0002554731,8.3767867e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006285873,0.0018957641,0.37078044,0.00037518927,0.002194202,0.00038605143,0.02444398,0.002352793,0.059627347,0.27226174,0.17635436,0.088699535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028757195,0.00011040279,0.15519826,0.00013527751,0.000054159835,0.001197883,0.0011062933,0.00003072328,0.0056172907,0.0010856872,0.83501685,0.00015962136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36912814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8496607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65866244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002681319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004738769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120118180","doi":"","title":"Off the Grid: Federal Jurisdiction and the CanadianElectricity Sector","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Federal jurisdiction; International law; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.010151021767147281,"score_gpt":0.24455631328010327,"score_spread":0.234405291512956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120118180","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34844017,0.0032320202,0.00006781836,0.46044913,0.0013727264,0.0004576183,0.00010293926,0.000050413917,0.18582717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9732855,0.00074442365,0.0000072552843,0.021869058,0.0025137933,0.0000015191525,4.3936285e-7,0.000004532663,0.0015735009],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988773,0.00024552346,0.00013650233,0.00008815193,0.0002834231,0.00036910243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940574,0.00012843045,0.00011031626,0.0000943839,0.000044148786,0.00021696143],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008899085,0.00007409693,0.00009993127,0.000021144187,0.0037468115,0.00040427275,0.0002341443,0.00005568943,0.00008076273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011361803,0.000043522003,0.000060788174,0.00018206735,0.00040171773,0.00017216358,0.000007122618,0.0003838512,0.000005777374],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008185422,0.000015325673,0.00029735305,0.0000011478929,0.000029449751,0.00004177917,0.018387215,0.000020387926,0.000011582346,0.72358334,0.22354239,0.03398815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004731256,0.000028587143,0.016354155,0.000005937547,0.000013126552,0.00012832863,0.0002585857,0.000044124117,0.000008012411,0.015185374,0.96742135,0.00007931508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.51116014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8833767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74387896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015073713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030625914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121157541","doi":"","title":"The Institutional and Substantive Effectsof the Human Rights Act in the United Kingdom","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; International law; Law; Kingdom; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.054285899526758226,"score_gpt":0.343612094592552,"score_spread":0.28932619506579377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121157541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9622692,0.00020712372,0.000029035502,0.009476824,0.0002311567,0.00016566199,0.0000012698396,0.000012200728,0.027607543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987201,0.00015906645,0.000007341567,0.0005236721,0.0004960218,0.0000050178214,0.0000011627375,0.00000381505,0.00008376936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980885,0.0007503428,0.00018692571,0.0001069715,0.000531846,0.0003354218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985933,0.001019632,0.00009966096,0.0001348465,0.00008283805,0.0000697729],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029509687,0.00009494621,0.000090823225,0.000036763857,0.010540209,0.00058400695,0.00057703396,0.000052074756,0.00003617437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001153375,0.000040468476,0.000054149863,0.00038585573,0.0013122999,0.00027869892,0.000037717,0.00051047705,0.00000877851],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003398667,0.000029333503,0.0047508413,0.0000014696435,0.00001281854,0.00017730196,0.008959521,0.000023366683,0.000030732925,0.9850154,0.0004430644,0.00052215566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028739581,0.000046792582,0.042085614,0.000057908488,0.00002262208,0.0002897136,0.0024467576,0.000016608941,0.000015883386,0.028322114,0.9263151,0.00009347967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022545557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19913916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9566933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000062555555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058500977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9907479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121303580","doi":"","title":"R' Blake Brown, A Trying Question: The Jury inNineteenth-Century Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Political science; Law; Legal history","score_opus":0.012610100967509145,"score_gpt":0.20214352779121061,"score_spread":0.18953342682370147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121303580","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35761,0.015397831,0.00005640083,0.4939388,0.0054059583,0.00032837238,0.00006348774,0.00019117238,0.12700798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833917,0.0011370967,0.00002523378,0.0064191315,0.0034570927,0.0000026961359,0.000007031082,0.000009934987,0.0055500744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998743,0.00007663084,0.00031823726,0.00013056879,0.00040878172,0.00032277254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993835,0.000039408547,0.00014722237,0.00011918423,0.0001821392,0.00012853357],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001804003,0.00015877197,0.00022433422,0.00001647888,0.007874908,0.0003087941,0.00024862637,0.000032301778,0.00084875675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020932775,0.00008623569,0.00016817702,0.000062483596,0.00014564977,0.00015679652,0.000027830622,0.00042117172,0.000014712251],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040176634,0.00013519492,0.00012205766,0.000011672635,0.0003571517,0.00024150555,0.06738739,0.00008488911,0.000030465048,0.51484686,0.3842056,0.032537047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016067212,0.00005165074,0.00021109599,0.000017748289,0.00007899443,0.00003285253,0.0028441446,0.000011639222,0.0000019130152,0.0015144004,0.9949234,0.00015145312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17904492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8577161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6786712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072238204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058112393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9934167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121574637","doi":"","title":"Revisiting the Doctrine of Intergenerational Equity inGlobal Environmental Governance","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Equity (law); Corporate governance; Political science; Environmental law; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Public economics; Finance","score_opus":0.018893057561618475,"score_gpt":0.3162500379848552,"score_spread":0.2973569804232367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121574637","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67776215,0.00066616846,0.0005006628,0.0030369135,0.00050502684,0.00010806581,0.000046838442,0.000014377114,0.31735978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957059,0.00037865277,0.0003561948,0.00062945264,0.0024906478,5.722094e-7,0.0000032666596,0.000006530565,0.00042878772],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855727,0.000113212496,0.000327653,0.00009388701,0.00058921654,0.0003187906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941605,0.00009703631,0.00025698854,0.00010061847,0.00000972324,0.00011956043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001892649,0.00008239485,0.000105230254,0.000010104411,0.0010324079,0.00006116979,0.00033495665,0.000049731294,0.0006956376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045439618,0.00006237356,0.00009423713,0.00007255371,0.00047597938,0.00020928972,0.00013480177,0.00023233137,0.000024600939],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036617028,0.000054536875,0.020228328,0.0000043418336,0.00003135518,0.000022652406,0.0023911144,0.000051348907,0.0038563171,0.92487633,0.00039530324,0.048051763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051412405,0.000060406797,0.064998396,0.000053168405,0.000028823933,0.00011671307,0.0019070745,0.000012652007,0.0036863608,0.004430493,0.9239688,0.00022297814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010969816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019942394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9235735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022211642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034252982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79405516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121646640","doi":"","title":"The Personal Information Protectionand Electronic Documents Act: A LostOpportunity to Democratize Canada's\"Technological Society\"","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Information society; Political science; Internet privacy; Public relations; Business; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.00823376168224244,"score_gpt":0.24372380977963076,"score_spread":0.23549004809738833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121646640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62943393,0.0004990127,0.00068977574,0.07094265,0.0008400332,0.001553948,0.0000293797,0.00023309528,0.29577821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99523807,0.00023414356,0.000028900064,0.001976126,0.00041441928,0.000025305879,0.0000018052626,0.000005487022,0.0020757618],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981364,0.00012425224,0.00029317467,0.00009670726,0.00078568014,0.0005637985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931985,0.00006229693,0.00013187315,0.00007509196,0.00018285742,0.00022803852],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012426521,0.00010645597,0.000120358396,0.00001574905,0.0053918324,0.0005420955,0.00032344993,0.000112879476,0.00055383483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014470753,0.00007246909,0.00007389037,0.00025741215,0.00019756811,0.0006587654,0.000024787265,0.0005431557,0.00003820816],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000342017,0.00014594558,0.0012950288,0.000037119138,0.00027230376,0.000039657727,0.028008668,0.00007960613,0.00009469507,0.23525493,0.11171929,0.62271076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017366487,0.000060661507,0.0003563225,0.0000148000145,0.000007667544,0.000039333183,0.0021591745,0.000016984348,0.000024195746,0.006673759,0.9903594,0.000114004724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4274713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8125731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8786402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055879867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019171777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121699755","doi":"","title":"A \"Reasonable\" Expectation of Sexual Privacy intheDigital Age","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privacy law; Information privacy; Internet privacy; Law; Psychology; Business; Computer science; Political science; Privacy policy","score_opus":0.027124936271374533,"score_gpt":0.3105962681194601,"score_spread":0.2834713318480856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121699755","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6796718,0.00012974578,0.00053650065,0.00047643294,0.0007335775,0.00011310901,0.0000056808694,0.000047480793,0.31828564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99574596,0.000014278804,0.00022623509,0.00010571694,0.0033035774,0.0000020980785,0.0000014851063,0.000011458896,0.000589167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865896,0.00010876773,0.00030293348,0.00012217155,0.0005231901,0.00028398435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908364,0.00006156773,0.00025033977,0.000093001196,0.00035872715,0.00015270567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006544462,0.000082436476,0.00017158002,0.000048316808,0.0008864138,0.00023356528,0.00027708217,0.00007842489,0.00025292367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032579465,0.00007104358,0.000041438187,0.00024596008,0.00053693575,0.00070952676,0.000040213938,0.00013953504,0.00003814994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002296153,0.0005016658,0.008565024,0.00012007533,0.00019579976,0.00021839819,0.37130654,0.0000060781326,0.0059947567,0.5395128,0.015493795,0.057855446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011549934,0.0010863988,0.0040364973,0.00021443043,0.00006883776,0.00011784492,0.04454049,0.000017829278,0.0025889417,0.035872992,0.90977854,0.0005222175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01064137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013369332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8942847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054567452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021355243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959469},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121763336","doi":"","title":"Property Ownership by Married WomenIn Victorian Ontario","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Business; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021994916112235797,"score_gpt":0.19855523737741052,"score_spread":0.1765603212651747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121763336","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39221,0.000600333,0.00011366369,0.0007976907,0.0010243112,0.00014514456,0.00007430751,0.00006793931,0.6049666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88755786,0.00029957254,0.000531823,0.0017954842,0.0007771826,0.00001191584,0.000021236578,0.000068235415,0.10893667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978811,0.000034709163,0.0008288715,0.00042641553,0.00010401994,0.00072486047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892277,0.000017631399,0.00034604993,0.00035832665,0.00003680172,0.00031845027],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006103024,0.00028407088,0.00052820536,0.000106377076,0.0006140592,0.00036303612,0.00044460234,0.0001942517,0.014511894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000056098097,0.00023483351,0.00019253837,0.00020055262,0.00011565868,0.0005274677,0.000030949985,0.00068619347,0.0015828648],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013942716,0.0020637955,0.10293404,0.00012006749,0.0009450175,0.0011848258,0.07183582,0.00035705577,0.00063701003,0.46138865,0.29901698,0.05812247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011103668,0.00011521966,0.0021670735,0.000022264625,0.0000073146157,0.00015606439,0.000019917947,0.00003255733,0.000090760936,0.0029196136,0.9929464,0.0004124798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02042087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027525842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6939294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041389032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007658072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122095553","doi":"","title":"The Legislature, The Executive and The Courts:The Delicate Balance of Power or Who is RunningThis Country Anyway?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Balance (ability); Executive power; Power (physics); Law; Separation of powers; Political science; Legislation; Law and economics; Economics; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.012996224039834196,"score_gpt":0.26635117729895375,"score_spread":0.25335495325911955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122095553","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.064012535,0.033900436,0.00340708,0.19756354,0.0050672526,0.0022420879,0.00018229378,0.00014648148,0.6934783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95559657,0.019432068,0.00004398007,0.008688017,0.0015113452,0.000014570136,0.0000010247325,0.000028380608,0.01468404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976202,0.00050121365,0.00037289644,0.00017519105,0.0008122424,0.00051820726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976928,0.0010845405,0.00041455842,0.00040126455,0.0002922372,0.00011457174],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002686978,0.00016909679,0.00025402918,0.000015038613,0.00610991,0.00058218365,0.0011103237,0.00012390202,0.0001556309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017565012,0.000055784516,0.00013264448,0.00028510377,0.021805288,0.00027166252,0.00009435866,0.0006884707,0.000008243283],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030361695,0.000025283536,0.00075686787,0.0000017727868,0.000116981966,0.000021415177,0.037108634,0.000003270237,0.000010461753,0.88968676,0.07115628,0.00080864964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008091525,0.000042154308,0.00041038988,0.00003108512,0.00006163192,0.0001740033,0.007324319,0.00005927688,0.000017923952,0.041131895,0.94982326,0.00011492524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015170536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004755495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89158404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004258217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017581414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122224998","doi":"","title":"Bad Company! the Assumptions Behind Proxy Advisors' Voting Recommendations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Voting; Incentive; Accounting; Corporation; Political science; Business; Welfare economics; Management; Economics; Law; Market economy; Politics","score_opus":0.01902477234677208,"score_gpt":0.247989263637209,"score_spread":0.22896449129043692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122224998","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031852134,0.00003335194,0.010228726,0.05346127,0.0025178601,0.00037357945,0.0000080103055,0.00020501406,0.90132004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95067674,0.000006037053,0.00072974234,0.04377309,0.0038528156,0.00001503309,0.00006171489,0.000026187301,0.0008586694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876493,0.000047096255,0.00041310917,0.00015547563,0.00035535588,0.00026401272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999091,0.00008621005,0.0003637397,0.00015242356,0.00028066023,0.00002591694],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008436633,0.00015084421,0.00012872921,0.00011025432,0.0018703158,0.0010896911,0.00038675126,0.00004400209,0.0014801498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011128318,0.00010700278,0.000117650845,0.00013868585,0.00009839141,0.0014002487,0.000094297786,0.00040278304,0.00082728505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006432537,0.00008075673,0.0015229939,0.000006991396,0.00003272789,0.0000014508474,0.000075532895,0.00016216365,0.000082843646,0.97500575,0.021894433,0.0011279116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043821396,0.000010777463,0.0034023204,0.000043584612,0.000042172327,0.00003508997,0.000102172075,0.028278291,0.000031563308,0.014588756,0.95286554,0.00016152528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002225661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001041156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96041703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033198925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015664582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122428691","doi":"","title":"Ministerial Misfeasance: R. v. Morris and a UniqueEarly Privacy Breach","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Computer security; Law; Internet privacy; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.0197245418296705,"score_gpt":0.28760336063646547,"score_spread":0.267878818806795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122428691","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6223229,0.0018294159,0.010125708,0.01808569,0.0035828382,0.00065099547,0.000038300266,0.00034156413,0.34302256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917874,0.00048373558,0.0013784899,0.0012043434,0.002876164,0.0000016955552,0.000002443877,0.000014108955,0.0022516197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831057,0.00021761401,0.0002911947,0.00020902525,0.00048116094,0.0004904569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911803,0.000050955176,0.00014882897,0.00017318457,0.00011476899,0.00039425577],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074869255,0.00014652625,0.00023153464,0.00004674112,0.0016759865,0.00060607295,0.00036951984,0.00015449857,0.0002762517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052160358,0.0001220994,0.00009186888,0.00014044314,0.0036099884,0.0005381908,0.000031543183,0.0003029419,0.000019649468],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010479903,0.0001417726,0.0006624513,0.000005255106,0.000028948729,0.0001935466,0.026499229,8.901156e-7,0.0006054453,0.938946,0.008507009,0.024304666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001367155,0.00029638733,0.0017609849,0.00004675131,0.000042682655,0.0003079569,0.0010142958,0.0000106999305,0.00014423844,0.08556186,0.90910625,0.0003407356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005922721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00061526085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90059924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000065983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016121929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122476124","doi":"","title":"Reorganizations, Sales, and the Changing Face of Restructuring in Canada: Quantitative Outcomes of 2012 and 2013 CCAA Proceedings","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restructuring; Face (sociological concept); Business; Accounting; Finance; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.009913395108357417,"score_gpt":0.2432080656075396,"score_spread":0.23329467049918218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122476124","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99144065,0.0008487756,0.0000029572582,0.006361929,0.00006884466,0.00011067279,0.000028613882,0.0000014566759,0.0011360932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987925,0.0005593981,0.00008317346,0.00022860873,0.000027171744,5.1078837e-7,2.2046564e-7,0.000005038394,0.00030334614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935347,0.000038573373,0.00018290961,0.0000644817,0.00018896426,0.00017162108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994725,0.00014177855,0.00022500978,0.000036455778,0.0000647143,0.000059563205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047557024,0.000050935152,0.00017527418,0.00004910078,0.00019885348,0.000027676084,0.000104504514,0.000023941835,0.000015950003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015684243,0.00003825469,0.000013593563,0.00018371815,0.00021906108,0.0002294901,0.000028798015,0.000114359456,2.9097495e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028229271,0.0000044903563,0.19625023,0.000038175298,0.000029265,0.0000028017087,0.06215301,0.00003164496,0.000090678004,0.73960197,0.0014973478,0.00027215693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021027806,0.00003468969,0.9022566,0.00026798673,0.00003172615,0.00004195858,0.05619189,0.00011898661,0.00029786758,0.008269735,0.030143665,0.00024212281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95284253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.991867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73133224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008515098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034736696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1559981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122569314","doi":"","title":"Structures of Judgment: How the ModernSupreme Court of Canada Organizes its Reasons","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; International law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.02497555007228185,"score_gpt":0.26464781071650384,"score_spread":0.23967226064422198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122569314","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89711964,0.0027861318,0.000037411723,0.062935434,0.00070143375,0.0003682225,0.00008313373,0.0000345208,0.035934076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983043,0.00032924817,0.00018954909,0.00032266002,0.00032140664,7.549988e-7,8.779474e-7,0.0000068727027,0.00052432826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982026,0.00017974526,0.00024099149,0.000105954925,0.0009100211,0.00036066724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988262,0.00015124373,0.00033093133,0.00011502964,0.0004421535,0.00013445369],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043149505,0.00012521463,0.00025713598,0.000013327401,0.00153532,0.00008040592,0.00047787462,0.00006484439,0.00009522263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043175614,0.00007532011,0.000082581,0.00016707554,0.00029063504,0.00017782889,0.000041174448,0.0002598649,4.7317812e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009732691,0.00025497447,0.006762253,0.000071895134,0.0009726949,0.000081658305,0.19663157,0.001213454,0.015203015,0.57856756,0.19315982,0.006983806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027372004,0.00047841438,0.2142782,0.00032304614,0.0005429824,0.00012194336,0.15341207,0.00018009942,0.03413358,0.03262967,0.5601234,0.001039379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22105533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74074763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5459379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017197152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031535566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122596293","doi":"","title":"Hit Them Where it Hurts: State Responses to Biker Gangsin Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.0418679837424621,"score_gpt":0.3227131730292298,"score_spread":0.2808451892867677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122596293","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3571708,0.00017698167,0.000047210095,0.094748,0.0013569869,0.00014657804,0.0001557608,0.000035828376,0.54616183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93980956,0.0001664751,0.0001287632,0.006705406,0.0008202251,0.0000027463584,3.5436764e-7,0.000017069688,0.05234941],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980151,0.00015555443,0.00022991224,0.00016042659,0.00072988775,0.0007090903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985099,0.00015506824,0.00020413035,0.00032672443,0.0001704403,0.00063375186],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007463775,0.0001257319,0.00018124003,0.000016688306,0.0032615478,0.00078041456,0.00083623326,0.00005884456,0.0008754036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00081564835,0.00010878106,0.000064037726,0.0000566952,0.0002909487,0.00038355283,0.000100869205,0.00029817375,0.000111756446],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041043095,0.000094493385,0.02890401,0.000025661782,0.00012349694,0.0017414688,0.022233205,0.000007860286,0.00031059133,0.5240741,0.40565115,0.016423523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019492756,0.000019612196,0.015961995,0.00005181988,0.00000834752,0.000019771764,0.00069200544,0.000001209413,0.00015663197,0.003923651,0.97880214,0.0001678779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9064836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9893615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58263874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028768906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012136709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122804512","doi":"","title":"Revising Canada's Ethical Rules for Judges Returningto Practice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal ethics; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.07271359044952126,"score_gpt":0.3724877803201102,"score_spread":0.29977418987058896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122804512","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044309734,0.00019077808,0.0011292585,0.3129327,0.002084082,0.00021555711,0.000014013016,0.00005174422,0.6789509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89512116,0.00020829639,0.049091537,0.050439905,0.0030123226,0.000016751275,0.000013456688,0.0000334452,0.0020631053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835455,0.00042651314,0.00031635832,0.00012889723,0.00045495664,0.0003187121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99730206,0.0010676947,0.00036792952,0.00012347128,0.00092821807,0.00021064824],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031860238,0.0000838654,0.0001156385,0.000041846884,0.0025716878,0.00041238283,0.0002577665,0.00015504604,0.0009066221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009170871,0.00007848436,0.00005024488,0.0002098345,0.00015354795,0.00094068545,0.000018225339,0.0014040546,0.000017751874],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046466528,0.000054765907,0.00021233849,0.0000071693744,0.000035590656,0.000015740292,0.022743417,7.4590736e-7,0.000013958807,0.8775641,0.09438942,0.004916333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013643265,0.000024030081,0.00030286578,0.000020175832,0.00004036858,0.000065373104,0.012389335,0.000003034224,0.000035085588,0.0071701407,0.9797002,0.00011297666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6224159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79697794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8906902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021636338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00338346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123222988","doi":"","title":"Reassessing the Constitutional Foundation ofDelegated Legislation in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Foundation (evidence); Law; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.029040781574877356,"score_gpt":0.2900123740432471,"score_spread":0.26097159246836976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123222988","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19874474,0.00027109482,0.002587453,0.015166416,0.0026966282,0.00018624998,0.0000073020697,0.000028370057,0.78031176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977107,0.000050710576,0.00007761085,0.0007770144,0.001336388,0.0000023960804,0.0000031031213,0.000001980198,0.00004007229],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988454,0.00015516406,0.00020947505,0.000085081454,0.00047677357,0.00022810645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994117,0.000099905985,0.00010868778,0.0000454515,0.00027723846,0.000056985064],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065763335,0.000060520644,0.00008085753,0.000026027732,0.0036038756,0.00014527723,0.00014139545,0.000028251248,0.00021825099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015141304,0.000044806344,0.000023290911,0.0002552553,0.001806877,0.00035039047,0.000021204185,0.00017691393,0.00001878051],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011562256,0.000009550975,0.011348684,3.039573e-7,0.000012454824,0.000012257308,0.00089713297,0.00004733062,0.00001953531,0.9810525,0.0007322266,0.0058564725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047801988,0.000021734215,0.05825231,0.00008729295,0.00002179964,0.00006824719,0.006317667,0.00021559178,0.000034645538,0.0830895,0.8512064,0.00020674526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9678229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99857754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.897963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006265179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037660971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123226226","doi":"","title":"The Stakes in Steak: Examining Barriers to and Opportunitiesfor Alternatives to Animal Products in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science","score_opus":0.017263932688144048,"score_gpt":0.22377357290457944,"score_spread":0.2065096402164354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123226226","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932066,0.000026114138,0.0000060681177,0.0028483032,0.000100831385,0.0002402751,0.0000070197157,0.0000037199652,0.003561026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983036,0.00001891341,0.00021724359,0.0011607805,0.00008990191,0.000008116154,5.1628115e-7,0.000008804613,0.0001921529],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868405,0.00009741897,0.00023551419,0.00021675014,0.00030832255,0.0004579491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929094,0.00005257583,0.000053817672,0.0001224655,0.000008261903,0.00047192108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057350256,0.00012987286,0.000120993725,0.000023952014,0.0004639406,0.00009026863,0.00023486593,0.000021992677,0.00026360314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019114043,0.00008443987,0.00000937167,0.00019521019,0.0002374749,0.00030341247,0.00019334946,0.00020892586,0.000008613582],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004641898,0.0000725641,0.8959112,0.000014294185,0.000024172748,0.00046317413,0.04596661,0.001960265,0.0067169014,0.00034250985,0.0058651203,0.04219898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028024748,0.0004211616,0.89166677,0.00002594836,0.0000032625967,0.00009134748,0.04995032,0.00004792833,0.0010570609,0.00014509716,0.056097396,0.0002134563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49728107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96633095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46904987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00114094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012372679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50606656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123241056","doi":"","title":"Time to Unpack the Juggernaut?: Reflections on the Canadian Federal Parliamentary Debates on \"Cyberbullying\"","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal and Policy Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Government (linguistics); Ideology; Law enforcement; Politics; Criminal law; Law; Criminology; Sociology; Public administration","score_opus":0.04187936068515336,"score_gpt":0.3272539980342994,"score_spread":0.28537463734914603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123241056","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08163169,0.000014872093,0.0000021422752,0.25794044,0.00049108936,0.00017398332,0.000013324305,0.000038942548,0.65969354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9278132,0.000014862662,0.000029910128,0.056061793,0.0025418205,0.000010395186,0.0000017552431,0.000017247165,0.013509044],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813807,0.00051281205,0.00017249653,0.0001408112,0.00046544924,0.0005703416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880767,0.00038319908,0.00007424749,0.00020648625,0.00007161491,0.00045680485],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011734121,0.00013477891,0.000120888435,0.00006138919,0.008449574,0.0008248273,0.0005283747,0.00007240406,0.0019157403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019373307,0.00007265387,0.00009452538,0.00022031253,0.00028398723,0.000112585025,0.00002553919,0.00052663026,0.002542624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004943744,0.00007283613,0.00023097513,0.0000016625157,0.0000972092,0.000024472194,0.057443358,0.00049277546,0.00009667441,0.3852455,0.5502052,0.006039928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082566,0.00012666533,0.0003649031,0.000026910819,0.0000101573105,0.000013295694,0.0014200789,0.0000127805,0.0001019291,0.005393778,0.99233097,0.00011596729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6991953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9558658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84618145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029784994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002276841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123270099","doi":"","title":"Environmental Assessment as Planning and Disclosure Tool: Greenpeace Canada v. Canada (A.G.)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Supreme court; Humanities; Context (archaeology); Ethnology; Law; Sociology; Geography; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.014996918391552167,"score_gpt":0.27184906309477247,"score_spread":0.2568521447032203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123270099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8726963,0.0005782546,0.00000956762,0.0038941198,0.0005887,0.00010587847,0.00007033203,0.000012154133,0.12204469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99523175,0.00007261205,0.0001683981,0.0021011368,0.0005961447,0.000002420717,0.000009372884,0.000016902968,0.0018012659],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998034,0.00017988596,0.00021669036,0.00016477,0.00094466406,0.00046000877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904656,0.000058287358,0.00011905852,0.0001129169,0.000008331532,0.00065486116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045592507,0.00014843495,0.00015918406,0.000012956107,0.001171606,0.00013266245,0.00021767557,0.000058232792,0.00022642106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020234289,0.00013766944,0.000026784715,0.000043666583,0.0002139673,0.0002437341,0.000082920145,0.00033805298,0.0000040879463],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078505356,0.00017218351,0.6952436,0.00001815262,0.00023530883,0.0028633191,0.015511804,0.00091075513,0.00022777206,0.12268811,0.15097319,0.011077282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042630808,0.000049042566,0.03561782,0.000015660382,0.000020297743,0.00015409329,0.007309423,0.000008234036,0.000024770945,0.0005350643,0.95560366,0.00023560681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9982234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8046305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013057955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022393109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9011165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123312319","doi":"","title":"From Law to Legal Studies and Beyond: 50 Yearsof Law and Legal Studies at Carleton University","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Empirical legal studies; Legal history; Political science; Legal research; Legal profession; Black letter law; Comparative law; Civil law (Civil law); Philosophy of law; Legal realism; Jurisprudence; Legal opinion; Private law; Public law","score_opus":0.04276154610866918,"score_gpt":0.3387218223215021,"score_spread":0.29596027621283294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123312319","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82990587,0.0047831065,0.000012228423,0.0066960203,0.0009144812,0.0001217721,0.000056010507,0.000034754506,0.15747575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897489,0.001520501,0.0004140657,0.0026635656,0.0015626582,0.000001077645,0.0000012871886,0.000008866624,0.004079087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869245,0.00018202054,0.00018157646,0.00025912092,0.0003989768,0.0002858526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989485,0.00024222748,0.000098864766,0.00008634071,0.00045179526,0.00017226092],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003877091,0.00015675079,0.00032777188,0.00003988064,0.0033395356,0.00014361783,0.00018321708,0.00004579597,0.000056877027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058436304,0.00013664349,0.000056136825,0.00009203398,0.0020370777,0.00066062907,0.0004457611,0.00016391663,0.00003249035],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011456955,0.00002270408,0.0005905962,0.0000046828436,0.00051007076,0.00007428603,0.029513665,0.0000011198717,0.00018829752,0.9528433,0.015917687,0.00021902265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037452928,0.00018445372,0.0009791211,0.000044361866,0.000062610314,0.000017373644,0.029406065,0.0000013383489,0.0002071367,0.0054098926,0.9631443,0.00016878563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028071538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39285576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9474334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022346101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033601005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123355475","doi":"","title":"Employee Pension Rights and the False Promiseof Trust Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pension; Law; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.03449696587863101,"score_gpt":0.2066261916260386,"score_spread":0.17212922574740758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123355475","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45749256,0.0018468621,0.00016961133,0.00032024283,0.0015159709,0.00036315783,0.00004732908,0.00004180712,0.53820246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99731886,0.00023118405,0.00019570871,0.0008215673,0.0007756241,0.0000127121975,0.000002914211,0.000035427096,0.00060597935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820334,0.00006016076,0.00095243694,0.000332288,0.000050121605,0.00040164942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987226,0.000055785153,0.00061684154,0.0003546698,0.00004692499,0.00020314756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014496039,0.0001810789,0.00061452994,0.00007232897,0.0009782335,0.0002733928,0.0003524112,0.0001393854,0.0005797031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002751713,0.00015759493,0.00019052009,0.00006849661,0.0006603144,0.00045625406,0.00009455752,0.00032444764,0.000459712],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011916244,0.00003618433,0.008697435,0.000009310308,0.0000776193,0.000020745629,0.0020665643,0.0000016782224,0.000002172896,0.98791784,0.00095996965,0.00009132157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030904168,0.00010082714,0.005733404,0.00003027814,0.000024073755,0.00027094063,0.000108758184,0.00012667032,0.00007426426,0.8713775,0.118729666,0.00033315292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012134819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004757445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53982633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058950875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012760918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9944435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123531963","doi":"","title":"Reading the Judicial Mind: Predicting the Courts' Reactionto the Use of Neuroscientific Evidence for Lie Detection","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lie detection; Reading (process); Psychology; Law; Political science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.12175589730601961,"score_gpt":0.3621088865846682,"score_spread":0.24035298927864862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123531963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9294133,0.00006607411,0.01619865,0.005048634,0.045276217,0.00076119707,0.000024431809,0.00006491779,0.0031465564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99529195,0.000020547912,0.00011463606,0.0012344188,0.002107784,0.000048835933,9.81038e-7,0.000025827077,0.0011550004],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981676,0.00036143488,0.00052455976,0.00027826487,0.00032447095,0.00034368975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969687,0.0014624874,0.0006044154,0.0006250636,0.00026281012,0.00007655539],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022669693,0.00014319077,0.00015357794,0.000080815655,0.0020237186,0.0002558408,0.00045639885,0.00014784225,0.00038165037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007970141,0.000074227006,0.0002076289,0.00024139599,0.0007086867,0.00028889254,0.000041563846,0.0011485505,0.000040736668],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028927715,0.00045864814,0.0031274862,0.00001868901,0.00042609227,0.00003052806,0.021017013,0.0002934359,0.33923224,0.027566288,0.09639544,0.5085414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009069275,0.00039531893,0.02574261,0.00004351095,0.00019554618,0.004023319,0.0018123315,0.001134741,0.0032216061,0.002137818,0.96019375,0.00019254097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031129632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020678076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86379826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023826695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028803777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123846341","doi":"","title":"Thresholds of Actionable Mental Harm in Negligence:A Policy-Based Appraisal","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Plaintiff; Prejudice (legal term); Damages; Compensation (psychology); Legitimacy; Political science; Limiting; Law; Mental illness; Mental health; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychiatry; Politics","score_opus":0.046588036081783836,"score_gpt":0.43052370568568976,"score_spread":0.3839356696039059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123846341","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9073419,0.00012177792,0.00018626862,0.03368857,0.0014909469,0.0006299658,0.000017593675,0.0000434188,0.05647955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942265,0.00007233442,0.0009853104,0.0031028772,0.001012524,0.000053844153,0.000009717422,0.000020476076,0.00051638455],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973609,0.00050832046,0.0008158901,0.00017399418,0.0005409318,0.0005999959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99785995,0.00095596997,0.00038659183,0.00025029693,0.00020789626,0.00033927773],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001240489,0.00014252847,0.00031949437,0.00015636063,0.0005477849,0.00002636499,0.00027493044,0.00022399331,0.010862144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00092632475,0.000113069334,0.00008790225,0.0002953846,0.00017267239,0.00052586733,0.00007312297,0.0013702796,0.00048831495],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001403996,0.004328939,0.53147256,0.0017728242,0.0002592656,0.00014513568,0.037243307,0.00046051422,0.022973975,0.17179826,0.20590511,0.022236075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004869011,0.00063043647,0.06907661,0.00095718773,0.000046561116,0.00006012968,0.021255793,0.001356291,0.00229378,0.011630455,0.8873176,0.000506166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012622373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012018612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68141246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015119373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066910294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99395263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124269426","doi":"","title":"Are Climate Change Policies Fair to Vulnerable Communities? the Impact of British Columbia's Carbon Tax and Australia's Carbon Pricing Policy on Indigenous Communities","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Carbon tax; Revenue; Climate change; Emissions trading; Disadvantaged; Political science; Politics; Public economics; Natural resource economics; Economics; Business; Economic growth; Finance; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.06984569229498805,"score_gpt":0.2746376265230765,"score_spread":0.20479193422808845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124269426","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97143286,0.00067616586,8.275111e-7,0.00035395948,0.00022524412,0.00028585145,0.0010354597,0.000022810258,0.025966829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99726623,0.00039533884,0.000015921867,0.0011134213,0.0009688021,0.00002763387,0.000008790611,0.000051120616,0.00015273086],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997978,0.00014692087,0.0007118203,0.000120380784,0.00006414009,0.0009787508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982361,0.00015915507,0.0008322461,0.0004473514,0.000042467236,0.0002826896],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012334622,0.00022063762,0.00065482553,0.00023802002,0.0010424209,0.00047267028,0.0004896222,0.00014549054,0.00004510817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040701045,0.00026440097,0.0001691972,0.0002332278,0.0002672556,0.00034552914,0.00023657239,0.00081275875,0.000011708394],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000287764,0.0001655046,0.96210945,0.00005779103,0.00013756266,0.0000043654086,0.029116105,0.00013329263,0.0000041471826,0.0073937043,0.00049112603,0.0003581527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005905517,0.0003778046,0.9827556,0.00019467482,0.00001488513,0.00030350563,0.008043372,0.0001377035,0.0000125499155,0.0057955077,0.0013675098,0.00040634078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86974883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26334056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6064083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030192625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022367121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124431951","doi":"","title":"Multi-Disciplinary Professional Practices: AConsumer Welfare Perspective","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Perspective (graphical); Welfare; Political science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Law; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.08992156980875435,"score_gpt":0.4158058668522224,"score_spread":0.3258842970434681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124431951","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.843444,0.00069086265,0.00019138747,0.0061431318,0.0028020313,0.00032685036,0.000008718827,0.00009749925,0.14629552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9767041,0.000056617308,0.0016428198,0.00058686186,0.001054304,0.000040010334,0.000030049476,0.000043218835,0.019842006],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979948,0.00031087617,0.0004062729,0.00031294237,0.0004921296,0.0004830252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853027,0.00007826977,0.0006377281,0.00023800843,0.0003275798,0.00018812895],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010185018,0.00021367885,0.00020101751,0.00015422916,0.0015944638,0.00012438984,0.0003073805,0.00017208737,0.023016607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007535808,0.00017307748,0.00010615044,0.00020106942,0.00012391512,0.00049575535,0.000085332795,0.00087008474,0.0015022771],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005269199,0.006144322,0.35753798,0.000082946746,0.0022912517,0.0043462883,0.3653548,0.00025079952,0.0015470242,0.1301179,0.073257685,0.053799782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034401214,0.00020202246,0.45335752,0.0000889562,0.000096897405,0.0028644358,0.04420015,0.0003803419,0.000015735885,0.00080225756,0.49404263,0.0005089383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000117679185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052059605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42078495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014642805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000100106925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124516724","doi":"","title":"Death to Semelhago","year":2016,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Damages; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Philosophy; Common law; Humanities; Sociology","score_opus":0.05073519481133954,"score_gpt":0.3128993821918387,"score_spread":0.2621641873804992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124516724","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08982741,0.0015766049,0.004986493,0.20608786,0.009437126,0.0008772557,0.00015191459,0.00025898378,0.68679637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8630318,0.0006627029,0.00017467952,0.0036842865,0.004147775,0.000004232766,5.989344e-7,0.00003994486,0.128254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99676716,0.00034823906,0.0005335818,0.00036934353,0.0009178751,0.0010638026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99796605,0.000112931266,0.00020573226,0.00030822848,0.00027856606,0.0011284953],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013164051,0.00028703385,0.00037694737,0.00010379216,0.0022160052,0.0005620042,0.00087351596,0.00018860564,0.0059066135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013210294,0.0001444186,0.00024102052,0.00033924426,0.00022532116,0.0007147991,0.00016559598,0.00041252899,0.0031577928],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029161017,0.00043008084,0.0022970035,0.000021880307,0.00028427257,0.0009145503,0.022498231,0.000007310718,0.0027630876,0.7078909,0.15308802,0.10951301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007094209,0.0003054155,0.0010080779,0.00022400447,0.00004683022,0.000118820615,0.00035690464,0.000003845779,0.00048456425,0.003245524,0.9931275,0.0003690389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032795542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011621622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84003955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024721742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002708258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124582573","doi":"","title":"The Myth of Jus Tractatus in La Belle Province: Quebec's Gérin-Lajoie Statement","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Humanities; Mythology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.013422383359622316,"score_gpt":0.3019322652268119,"score_spread":0.28850988186718957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124582573","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7556839,0.0006782749,0.00021563328,0.00792019,0.001421929,0.00030309573,0.000018075418,0.000020051008,0.23373885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961898,0.00026298073,0.00012240757,0.00022709975,0.00047916762,0.000004155639,0.0000026794753,0.000007026148,0.002704688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984986,0.00027020994,0.00032338325,0.000060280898,0.0005239679,0.00032353878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930435,0.00019502598,0.00023567292,0.00006392674,0.000107118496,0.00009388551],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021131858,0.00006446218,0.00008937146,0.000032745,0.001038407,0.00009241648,0.00020820404,0.00005091111,0.00007585283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007538613,0.00004584158,0.000053174816,0.00007947125,0.00017521712,0.00046216752,0.000035062247,0.00022541196,0.000012522686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036944773,0.00021854068,0.003923482,0.0000053128288,0.000021545404,0.000009688946,0.01421318,0.00004054283,0.00013556758,0.9709318,0.0018367287,0.008626627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003785631,0.000027095462,0.0121169165,0.000028457813,0.000007857478,0.000008625126,0.0027901237,0.000014245859,0.0004224239,0.0032903703,0.98083293,0.00008236621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027301019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18006204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9789962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018512942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002512069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9791763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124884951","doi":"","title":"Law's Ambition and the Reconstruction of Role Moralityin Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; International law","score_opus":0.011589309574514189,"score_gpt":0.23826144138111421,"score_spread":0.22667213180660004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124884951","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4585933,0.0017742797,0.0000472122,0.028063739,0.0006271055,0.00013735142,0.000018901668,0.000016141496,0.5107219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99820554,0.0002897899,0.000089267975,0.00076300855,0.00060778996,0.0000015834195,4.168696e-7,0.0000015965597,0.000041022708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999283,0.00011933902,0.00016047551,0.000053138396,0.00026230028,0.0001217112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996567,0.000058721256,0.00010118547,0.00003272794,0.000100273515,0.000050389783],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004984385,0.000042715987,0.00010072491,0.000008255914,0.0015533433,0.00004144191,0.00007016707,0.000024569228,0.000060473576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034024997,0.000029580247,0.000030756248,0.000060618197,0.0012018031,0.00015987006,0.000017360684,0.000109980916,0.0000012191148],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022544667,0.0000066038833,0.0005966397,7.2441395e-7,0.000018082,0.0000012167746,0.0010104445,0.000016098811,0.00001751125,0.9860063,0.00028979167,0.01201401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013694064,0.000024978415,0.00549547,0.000056801724,0.0000698588,0.00017067681,0.014148511,0.000043721448,0.00028558017,0.32732067,0.65083194,0.0001823951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9260044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99165314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6586857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007374147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001931455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125173313","doi":"","title":"From Kyoto to Marrakech; A Long Walk throughthe Desert: Mirage Or Oasis?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Nuclear Issues and Defense","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Desert (philosophy); International law; Geology; Geography; Geochemistry; Archaeology; Earth science; Physical geography; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04878764854350702,"score_gpt":0.31208041688095467,"score_spread":0.26329276833744764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125173313","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71135956,0.0007175517,0.00040323375,0.009888839,0.0016709833,0.00039447602,0.000036273967,0.00021526447,0.27531382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9752581,0.0003685458,0.0041104215,0.003917472,0.0029416187,0.000005313616,0.000001764008,0.000052273837,0.013344453],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978663,0.00023469022,0.00031876602,0.00026608034,0.0006833222,0.00063086825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998824,0.00013568951,0.00011902006,0.0002869471,0.00010696531,0.0005274015],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005298264,0.00017599149,0.0002637124,0.000055810746,0.0015612497,0.000610692,0.000547171,0.00014496736,0.01972904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015918353,0.00013316263,0.00015420366,0.00033944397,0.00016244335,0.00040962728,0.00009929264,0.00037310654,0.0022909967],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009394343,0.00087878696,0.003464532,0.000028003538,0.00041568713,0.00844632,0.37802103,0.0001183379,0.0009738808,0.05142102,0.43294093,0.12235204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004291144,0.00010800374,0.0007825573,0.000056120487,0.000030027719,0.00007916033,0.0043411846,0.000038762184,0.00006486807,0.0028441949,0.990969,0.00025699695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008418291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041235708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5580281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000149455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004420353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125350492","doi":"","title":"Collective Bargaining in the Shadow of the CharterCathedral: Union Strategies in a Post B.C. HealthWorld","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Health Services Management and Policy","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shadow (psychology); Collective bargaining; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.08824051420492046,"score_gpt":0.38244857411846833,"score_spread":0.29420805991354787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125350492","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57084846,0.00014326256,0.000022129934,0.009355548,0.000611635,0.0012433614,0.000015960142,0.000022095635,0.41773757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862201,0.000075977885,0.000077881436,0.013034732,0.00027186013,0.00004445926,0.0000026080775,0.00002022958,0.00025214374],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956355,0.0024339322,0.0008302467,0.00014325614,0.000287028,0.000670001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863046,0.00033841707,0.00050737045,0.0003120181,0.00012214166,0.000089604066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037958827,0.00014828707,0.0002724982,0.00019929522,0.0010072002,0.000023108032,0.0006573534,0.00011715044,0.00029655534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004266354,0.000085029686,0.00006740018,0.0007954,0.000082250954,0.00031089544,0.00012249182,0.0015086844,0.000026086125],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022798621,0.00024831,0.08672303,0.0003459332,0.000026950667,0.00003091081,0.5834423,0.000019802581,0.000037053003,0.32662612,0.00094082416,0.0013308113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017580842,0.00026894256,0.83080995,0.00086752925,0.000017602304,0.000016818423,0.11239921,0.0001315727,0.000006688108,0.044491623,0.009067958,0.0001640094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04307928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2583297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7440869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021909247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011573238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96329296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125353779","doi":"","title":"Nickled and Dimed: The Dispute over Intellectual Property Rights inthe Bluenose II","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.04238115635794205,"score_gpt":0.21161449296386106,"score_spread":0.16923333660591902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125353779","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.921453,0.00035409178,0.0005661613,0.0036653408,0.0015644236,0.00045186724,0.0000031315906,0.00012548362,0.07181649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99027336,0.000057981833,0.00007487175,0.0059394827,0.0021801617,0.0000075184507,0.0000061416367,0.000038883278,0.0014215726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984215,0.000036741625,0.0003923156,0.00027244876,0.0003965215,0.00048047164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927604,0.000076021664,0.00018964359,0.0002486195,0.00016607069,0.000043589083],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005694759,0.00028518445,0.00024757689,0.00010769469,0.0028788398,0.0008045264,0.0004939472,0.00010287259,0.0011598973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018769389,0.0001248128,0.00012341356,0.00028975654,0.00031659353,0.0011195946,0.00044936195,0.0007017175,0.0004789431],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006426384,0.0045035845,0.003029166,0.00073287357,0.002712996,0.0018443215,0.06064324,0.0027470996,0.008958325,0.5425343,0.24872544,0.11714225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018852175,0.0001271629,0.00034585476,0.00018707722,0.00013171262,0.00026484652,0.0002586845,0.001321119,0.00058492506,0.030261358,0.9641642,0.0004678503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030590952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002374091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7154387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004451172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003070526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125510305","doi":"","title":"Foreseeably Unclear: The Meaning of the \"ReasonablyForeseeable\" Criterion for Access to Medical Assistancein Dying in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Law; Political science; Medicine; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02975658005082675,"score_gpt":0.31499844866712234,"score_spread":0.2852418686162956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125510305","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7031371,0.0002780181,0.0007310541,0.225142,0.0024342525,0.0009844487,0.00020832468,0.000015707552,0.067069076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857339,0.000027492546,0.00009010721,0.013045649,0.00081617176,0.000011958401,2.5558583e-7,0.00001266165,0.00026178925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978377,0.00019002586,0.00031226157,0.00013384644,0.0009732728,0.00055285293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987904,0.0003011004,0.00019513626,0.00018964801,0.0001915185,0.00033219554],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016320178,0.00008929612,0.00015896933,0.000031834097,0.0015654373,0.00019924063,0.0012760445,0.00006191864,0.00022671989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017203577,0.000057347283,0.000066689456,0.0004391577,0.000373757,0.00027849426,0.00012123728,0.000289964,0.0000011147238],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031489437,0.00004703274,0.04018636,0.000042649095,0.000068674635,0.000065011394,0.028258031,0.00025574365,0.000101691,0.569182,0.333187,0.028290946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041569475,0.000036034755,0.029847618,0.00028102504,0.0000076105775,0.000016022306,0.0015799213,0.0003267299,0.00015120725,0.006658852,0.9605438,0.00013545957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9899083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6273568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007210215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044181426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127901373","doi":"","title":"The Implications of UNCLOS for Canada's RegulatoryJurisdiction in the Offshore-The 200-Mile Limit and theContinental Shelf","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mile; United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; Submarine pipeline; Limit (mathematics); Political science; Oceanography; Geography; Law; International law; Geology; Mathematics; Geodesy","score_opus":0.006010186762721016,"score_gpt":0.2274425713559345,"score_spread":0.22143238459321346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127901373","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95578426,0.00022404375,0.00021703335,0.013452689,0.00023150285,0.00041955977,0.00003742376,0.0000061533337,0.029627353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99865794,0.000032975822,0.0001751614,0.0006836337,0.00015271899,0.000013994017,0.0000035152873,0.000008550849,0.00027153324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989996,0.00005484632,0.000299282,0.000103621824,0.0003232103,0.00021946093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918056,0.00042227437,0.0001491969,0.0001780387,0.000029140752,0.000040790863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012717868,0.00007939266,0.00007579799,0.000011407507,0.00070785696,0.00006245557,0.00041440182,0.00003109896,0.00008583302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040468345,0.000041410487,0.000042508924,0.00008845232,0.00027880416,0.000097519034,0.00006177534,0.00017765703,0.0000023342777],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045781306,0.0003994016,0.39855957,0.000018838076,0.00017821636,0.000030571962,0.0052163205,0.001049402,0.007694136,0.41554835,0.11474696,0.056100424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028794285,0.000047603648,0.666614,0.000010146781,0.000017335284,0.00018804545,0.0006646074,0.0002352091,0.0008552747,0.008398585,0.3226035,0.000077788616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07468843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83105296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7563645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015098245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025496329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9314733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3130718974","doi":"","title":"Peter Aucoin, Mark D.Jarvis &Lori Turnbull,Democratizing the Constitution: Reforming ResponsibleGovernment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04424122050940862,"score_gpt":0.2707355482931368,"score_spread":0.22649432778372816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3130718974","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021959739,0.00093851547,0.00039219443,0.0039004218,0.0018607733,0.00018453844,0.000009647324,0.0000631957,0.97069097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99484205,0.0005888339,0.00054037163,0.0016843767,0.0016565322,0.000010632081,6.7871895e-7,0.0000073872948,0.00066912035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978038,0.00027484162,0.00037303224,0.00018593259,0.00085841207,0.0005039489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910414,0.00014491004,0.00021182038,0.00016073647,0.00019625975,0.00018215261],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017576328,0.00016090601,0.00019153478,0.00003913928,0.00667883,0.00018009076,0.0004161197,0.00008275629,0.0006769918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020979832,0.00010511355,0.00015135479,0.00023214823,0.0016419815,0.00046740338,0.00013160007,0.00043064854,0.00012960471],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010361081,0.00004321239,0.0015141101,0.0000020104587,0.00008480774,0.00014385513,0.010535202,0.0000020101052,0.000055069177,0.98181933,0.0027917754,0.0029050312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033358863,0.00006685572,0.004072881,0.00008484724,0.000070785565,0.0002733131,0.011974777,0.0000025035208,0.00017000959,0.05145805,0.93124163,0.00025075654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005833961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013630338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97288233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002845105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003965052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99461436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133561944","doi":"","title":"Tending the Bar: The \"Good Character\" Requirementfor Law Society Admission","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Character (mathematics); Law; Bar (unit); Political science; Geography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.029853419716642154,"score_gpt":0.31755118244864583,"score_spread":0.28769776273200365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133561944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0771498,0.0021405332,0.0011727181,0.03976625,0.0046635536,0.00078400504,0.0000113288625,0.00019446849,0.8741174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890654,0.00026202478,0.00006789751,0.0041041123,0.0054897573,0.0000036852045,0.0000011949691,0.000018528399,0.000987406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976717,0.00018346346,0.0004217435,0.00016259153,0.00090919464,0.00065130217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988229,0.00024737584,0.0003272815,0.00017940282,0.00017830597,0.00024473565],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006213559,0.00013919934,0.00016616879,0.000011334988,0.008335572,0.0006933052,0.0006613857,0.00012337965,0.00031877356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000108525055,0.00007049493,0.00022362295,0.00024891327,0.00048569118,0.000634274,0.00008415905,0.0005827478,0.000043132997],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003350009,0.00007108914,0.0011007003,0.000017665952,0.000085167674,0.000029879564,0.032153018,0.0000022699744,0.0012776353,0.94785804,0.008624888,0.008746145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002136051,0.000037934784,0.0006143093,0.00007138984,0.00003058553,0.00003986729,0.011741459,0.000005170287,0.00039963156,0.005639657,0.9810772,0.00012921389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009587156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016991649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9724523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001374813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016065598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135674092","doi":"","title":"The Chemical Castration of Recidivist Sex Offenders inCanada: A Matter of Faith","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Faith; Criminology; Castration; Law; Political science; Psychology; Philosophy; Theology; Medicine; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.013876843022016515,"score_gpt":0.22995090531111978,"score_spread":0.21607406228910325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135674092","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9850946,0.000006038627,0.00009782932,0.0021831163,0.000109430344,0.000033109725,0.0000027767492,0.0000035238684,0.012469551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99867105,0.000005103509,0.00044221443,0.00062169106,0.00003580951,0.0000010231734,0.0000015685149,0.0000045530605,0.00021699042],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992795,0.000042932556,0.0002590221,0.00007851652,0.00021268251,0.00012735029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995225,0.00006281002,0.0001929557,0.00014574232,0.000019718247,0.000056237568],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002781404,0.00006149817,0.00009628547,0.000012355403,0.00020063417,0.000017661554,0.0002129254,0.000055669276,0.0013994375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031709784,0.000041857842,0.00004975187,0.00006658033,0.00056172226,0.00010017804,0.000045393204,0.00027345028,0.000024901143],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006459284,0.000119595104,0.6079082,0.000009264885,0.00008407947,0.00001410596,0.0008626098,0.000072100716,0.3424975,0.0042081354,0.03709929,0.0070605325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00097644125,0.000111324516,0.80509573,0.000021876916,0.00012261652,0.0007590996,0.0012638764,0.00042585973,0.12994084,0.0046807383,0.056280494,0.0003211254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019002102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011554229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21255668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016922819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024136225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99951345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3136036367","doi":"","title":"Canadian East Coast Offshore Oil and Gas Industry: SustainableDevelopment through Cooperative Federalism","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Offshore oil and gas; Submarine pipeline; Fossil fuel; Petroleum industry; East coast; International law; Environmental science; Petroleum engineering; Oceanography; Political science; Geology; Engineering; Law; Environmental engineering; Waste management","score_opus":0.018805250342699878,"score_gpt":0.2654769451978004,"score_spread":0.24667169485510054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3136036367","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14604925,0.000744245,0.000020405512,0.13495862,0.00069977687,0.00014931086,0.00021425054,0.000033199398,0.71713096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9469564,0.00071671023,0.00025751189,0.013532262,0.0005322975,0.0000078461135,0.0000039592187,0.000025035813,0.037968002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807787,0.00025093992,0.00023326169,0.00020209468,0.0003552489,0.0008805635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985492,0.00003526791,0.00011587403,0.00010168289,0.0002246375,0.0009733111],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006273259,0.00016920739,0.00020051886,0.00005644064,0.003791237,0.0006103395,0.00019465902,0.0002475378,0.00051089627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023666577,0.00016821548,0.00003996867,0.00028760458,0.00035529645,0.00046300638,0.00002015911,0.0007084803,0.0000126481855],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000831929,0.000018557974,0.0013130013,0.0000071877275,0.000041301828,0.00043372854,0.047116555,0.00001919659,0.0000024318683,0.84198797,0.10528675,0.003765012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038637995,0.000022139886,0.00050375145,0.000038682672,0.000009079968,0.00019902624,0.015959758,0.0000012268054,0.000016641567,0.0046769683,0.9779609,0.00022548837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90853304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9954438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8726741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009604779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004174141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99750566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3136884324","doi":"","title":"Acceptance Speech for Lifetime Achievement Award from Canadian Prison Lawyers Association","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Association (psychology); Psychology; Criminology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.012617326367680422,"score_gpt":0.2801683537323299,"score_spread":0.2675510273646495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3136884324","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96503997,0.000118043325,0.00091883814,0.007754588,0.0023443922,0.00032554465,0.00006687808,0.00004127058,0.023390453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921763,0.00020011982,0.0016156477,0.0012774142,0.001503979,0.00000992297,0.000024438481,0.00001772547,0.0031744747],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998443,0.00011798409,0.00025533553,0.00019213112,0.0005004264,0.0004911014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886286,0.00017774862,0.00023529484,0.0001375628,0.00026837486,0.0003181616],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094261166,0.00010519554,0.00019263252,0.00009834061,0.0014572958,0.0004513812,0.00028368286,0.0001338652,0.0010645357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001366872,0.00010756399,0.0001901663,0.0002398091,0.00003206515,0.0003978105,0.000015637153,0.00025341345,0.00025757236],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029698625,0.0005419618,0.27142715,0.000058138274,0.0017689856,0.00008407063,0.095152944,0.0010454792,0.0011854428,0.025865443,0.06208465,0.5404887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040378378,0.000072239534,0.0035935026,0.000029197738,0.0003075281,0.0000021432052,0.08471175,0.00020879612,0.00012026189,0.0006292586,0.90969634,0.00022517404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6937809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96875495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8476117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001151021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038203213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137293715","doi":"","title":"No Longer \"naked and shivering outside her gates\":Establishing Law as a Full-time On-campus AcademicDiscipline at McGill University inthe Nineteenth Century","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Shivering; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.0142658996002793,"score_gpt":0.21083091975944307,"score_spread":0.19656502015916377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137293715","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3904695,0.00031483357,0.0000059134554,0.0009856541,0.0011107528,0.00019745386,0.00016534112,0.00010729762,0.60664326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92860854,0.0024838482,0.0007028378,0.0029173808,0.0017758819,0.0000018938458,0.000016869179,0.000091826325,0.06340093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830765,0.00021003981,0.00022805572,0.00029700657,0.0004220152,0.0005352112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881613,0.000095765565,0.00021405985,0.00015767459,0.00010764738,0.0006087286],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006722181,0.00016377264,0.00023258952,0.00021209654,0.004492598,0.00025666054,0.00042384682,0.00020830505,0.003446799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000087049855,0.00019027707,0.000114209644,0.00018450149,0.0007978874,0.00094495656,0.0002772874,0.00070116133,0.0005047918],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027015328,0.0006517117,0.0026818474,0.00012944077,0.00076471525,0.005676973,0.23704223,0.00010187593,0.005626652,0.61795497,0.1109879,0.01568015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005152802,0.00007452558,0.00047754968,0.00007804598,0.00005686686,0.0000870417,0.0018893015,0.000011271083,0.00002506447,0.0010058694,0.9955003,0.00027886548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16621238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.65078986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8845124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001280364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014328743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139156576","doi":"","title":"Non-Majority Union Representation conforms to ILOFreedom of Association Principles and (Potentially)Promotes Inter-Union Collaboration: New ZealandLessons for Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Political science; Association (psychology); European union; Law; International trade; Psychology; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.027173079031915397,"score_gpt":0.28508857843679286,"score_spread":0.25791549940487746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3139156576","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.937831,0.00005220966,0.027317846,0.01200265,0.002533386,0.001369458,0.0002815971,0.000043511995,0.018568378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944918,0.000074574215,0.0028793921,0.00024832902,0.00041405062,0.000007865212,0.000028901632,0.00001104755,0.0018440112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986948,0.00011527995,0.00037077232,0.0001464136,0.00041852784,0.00025425656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984964,0.000079976664,0.00042033772,0.00010913968,0.0006525151,0.00024162912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011715374,0.000096018615,0.00018143366,0.000057759673,0.00077720266,0.00014434938,0.00017057749,0.00008881791,0.00006989594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026784537,0.00008557191,0.000039650855,0.0002592903,0.000050748684,0.0004306044,0.00004498313,0.000108472675,2.9818915e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024713855,0.0003740712,0.11521798,0.00004064802,0.00042430818,0.000012329895,0.08151106,0.000115094386,0.0027704109,0.73595124,0.025271485,0.038064253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035794543,0.00073888357,0.28994057,0.00020392913,0.00022473274,0.000008069279,0.024675483,0.00021308071,0.0072270064,0.014204141,0.65837014,0.0006145373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7589054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9776449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7217471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002727897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081972755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5977693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3151050557","doi":"","title":"Debtor in Possession Financing:The Jursidiction Of Canadian Courts toGrant Superpriority Financing in CCAAApplications","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Debtor; Business; Finance; Creditor; Debt","score_opus":0.012936404485704841,"score_gpt":0.22225516030508374,"score_spread":0.2093187558193789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3151050557","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9716394,0.0001242203,0.000057768895,0.0023676455,0.00019438795,0.0001685114,0.0000032427686,0.000017767816,0.025427084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983902,0.00008328544,0.00010850437,0.000876045,0.00037852206,0.0000078597295,0.000008732292,0.000012235407,0.00013464097],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899346,0.000021401054,0.0003938731,0.00013192253,0.00018615827,0.00027320845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954253,0.000025044896,0.00016561458,0.00014921137,0.00009089442,0.000026723597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004692214,0.00010552134,0.00015840575,0.00047635438,0.0003867174,0.00016047491,0.00019618809,0.00006161185,0.0003650391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044140004,0.00008472784,0.00005181644,0.0008464536,0.000047554193,0.00069730455,0.00001593055,0.00031781822,0.000046774774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029362837,0.0009373573,0.35695136,0.00021571796,0.000038774837,0.0002986645,0.00719066,0.013192844,0.003237214,0.22612159,0.015136115,0.3763861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005329817,0.000007144577,0.2986025,0.00015612684,0.000012391377,0.000018243461,0.00025437362,0.0020631088,0.00007200491,0.00091272854,0.6972362,0.00013221685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5569645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7717048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68210006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008569602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008766089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4459857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154150950","doi":"","title":"How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the GATS:An Examination of the Impact of the General Agreementon Trade in Services on the Canadian Health-Care System","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General Agreement on Trade in Services; Legal service; Political science; Health care; Business; Public relations; Law; International trade; World trade","score_opus":0.019311952829334657,"score_gpt":0.28553233498082337,"score_spread":0.2662203821514887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154150950","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9348449,0.00023736057,6.870479e-7,0.059767995,0.00010436306,0.00031662078,0.0001099619,0.0000019232937,0.0046161646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99777114,0.00001511993,0.0000035263322,0.0016939734,0.00027586293,0.0000018144243,7.1751214e-7,0.00000692549,0.00023094259],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983173,0.00066277216,0.00019360836,0.00009689344,0.00041005752,0.00031934382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924946,0.000067030516,0.00030184223,0.00019949718,0.000043898166,0.00013828767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009818109,0.000087159984,0.00012102533,0.000042439206,0.0010872205,0.00020790506,0.0004819753,0.00005101855,0.000008099229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028030267,0.000040919516,0.00007428134,0.00032886735,0.00016362495,0.00012971347,0.000020502206,0.00024702275,3.7015974e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006746462,0.00007515322,0.026554858,0.00013534159,0.000077346915,0.000013232008,0.57130283,0.007662107,0.00055322563,0.3632548,0.00708964,0.023213986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027134718,0.00009368493,0.95425683,0.00027322437,0.000010605116,0.000013030651,0.03128963,0.00015375238,0.00013941557,0.0003499744,0.013047659,0.000100825535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95354474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99727315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.927702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00084472826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005368582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83621305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155697493","doi":"","title":"Testing the Limits: Alcohol & Drug TestingFor Offshore Employees","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Drug; Alcohol; Business; Submarine pipeline; Pharmacology; Chemistry; Medicine; Engineering; Geotechnical engineering","score_opus":0.07072950114219628,"score_gpt":0.31607654620159054,"score_spread":0.24534704505939425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155697493","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69491357,0.00073667895,0.00006843613,0.005132035,0.0008878114,0.00020367237,0.000012565993,0.00016842141,0.2978768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913493,0.00026395253,0.0005487163,0.001312329,0.0032788583,0.000008087406,9.930233e-7,0.00003299332,0.0032047997],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976917,0.00022441907,0.00035219124,0.00021880664,0.0007963003,0.0007165633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978799,0.0010664389,0.00034832256,0.00023563867,0.00025315513,0.00021651818],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001413306,0.00018816318,0.00021733818,0.000038083414,0.004036032,0.0006015729,0.000700437,0.00007800528,0.00018178516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013711669,0.00013532453,0.00012850945,0.0004609832,0.0005567644,0.0006021642,0.000059246075,0.00061731704,0.000044417346],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016455837,0.00083533116,0.3436044,0.00004007253,0.00025268953,0.0009872428,0.1346926,0.00046673993,0.0022451994,0.128699,0.13079219,0.25722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003956572,0.000069356916,0.02230292,0.00012585729,0.000047653866,0.00033732704,0.010355682,0.000047542744,0.00015901844,0.005734576,0.96009856,0.0003258702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015989264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040168546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82930636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013621581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023309934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172460546","doi":"","title":"A Proposed Transjudicial Approach to s. 15(2)Charter Adjudication","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Charter; Political science; International law; Law; Law and economics; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.019784451617929466,"score_gpt":0.2909947069325724,"score_spread":0.27121025531464293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3172460546","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08712161,0.00014829681,0.018164853,0.030682724,0.0008707911,0.00071138714,0.000007778503,0.00022198031,0.86207056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929548,0.000058665766,0.0015643506,0.002909668,0.002112856,0.00000404424,0.00000440951,0.000010546104,0.00038066544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983748,0.00014505189,0.00028346293,0.00019062041,0.0006106432,0.000395387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925625,0.000015415613,0.00010442795,0.00012619911,0.00015030107,0.00034738507],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008713607,0.0001111221,0.00016248475,0.00008923659,0.0013975068,0.00025248967,0.00026686478,0.00011011026,0.00020377059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029206116,0.00010278885,0.00010864556,0.00029026272,0.00010318865,0.00033588274,0.000007664784,0.00027319655,0.000064145315],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025191347,0.0008596411,0.00026239833,0.000007733357,0.000057011657,0.000029094961,0.10490612,0.00006336325,0.004700486,0.57611036,0.011967209,0.3007847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077725644,0.00032509567,0.008080288,0.000031035364,0.000044588363,0.000049581293,0.0015719724,0.0000663675,0.00023883123,0.009553641,0.9789725,0.00028882193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007354882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013531009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9670053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000087334985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000120722674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186913287","doi":"","title":"Lawyering at the Intersection of Public Law and LegalEthics: Government Lawyers as Custodians of the Ruleof Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Custodians; Law; Public law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Commercial law; Private law; Comparative law; Legal profession; Legal history; Intersection (aeronautics); Government (linguistics); Chinese law; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02737623722551455,"score_gpt":0.3189949639396431,"score_spread":0.2916187267141286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186913287","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35612124,0.000027271442,0.000019915211,0.058983635,0.0016871274,0.000120787634,0.000011214445,0.000011396405,0.5830174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99520993,0.00003269011,0.00010398017,0.003183404,0.0003173113,0.000004192638,7.209146e-7,0.000009204185,0.0011385669],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984226,0.00031197185,0.000312533,0.000101482685,0.0006539486,0.00019742615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986762,0.00032034796,0.00043916397,0.00021541747,0.0002550417,0.00009387572],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002345861,0.00008019046,0.00010684724,0.000014447381,0.002064729,0.0002914961,0.00032809033,0.00010501849,0.0006460942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004494561,0.0000521349,0.00007753727,0.00023166758,0.0015252406,0.00078190444,0.000094120296,0.0011000409,0.000009273143],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008522102,0.000048001588,0.00063470344,0.0000058363803,0.000027706661,5.2605486e-7,0.014338488,0.0000035370917,0.0035257197,0.98008215,0.00059359544,0.00073119794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016328313,0.0000278458,0.00061721914,0.000020404805,0.000029773226,0.000055066175,0.014523647,0.0000053598555,0.0034831755,0.006184848,0.97481215,0.00007721018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040584505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40642443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97421855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013127315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028896882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99923444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3190073198","doi":"","title":"\"No Sinecure\": William Young as Attorney Generalof Nova Scotia, 1854-1857","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Law; Nova (rocket); Political science; Criminology; Psychology; History; Archaeology; Engineering","score_opus":0.026763995328733,"score_gpt":0.24596688545276837,"score_spread":0.21920289012403538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3190073198","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051320337,0.00084832,0.000053875658,0.0005273786,0.005815798,0.0001287959,0.0000243693,0.000080617305,0.9412005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90989196,0.0010238766,0.0016513349,0.004283184,0.007877106,0.0000036182432,0.000012137848,0.00008921897,0.07516756],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794406,0.00017387711,0.00034997182,0.00024148358,0.0006468245,0.0006437701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857575,0.000022229366,0.00021278384,0.00023628735,0.0002918909,0.00066107215],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007722124,0.00015458679,0.00023084032,0.0002598093,0.002515822,0.00080981245,0.0005738972,0.0001814555,0.013187172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001342481,0.00018743852,0.00020056346,0.0002881891,0.00096247136,0.00071786257,0.00004763321,0.00049899146,0.0038221064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009632724,0.00034887408,0.006591909,0.00003057402,0.00020471738,0.0013446754,0.060840473,0.000009109495,0.0005712012,0.40925798,0.5152753,0.005428828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028780077,0.000063367654,0.003301475,0.000031158248,0.00003928644,0.0001415895,0.00048446853,0.000001521915,0.000021107544,0.0020432188,0.99332273,0.00026229222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.837173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9783439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86603296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064251997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00096326426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99878275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W320511781","doi":"","title":"The Tabling of International Treaties in the Parliament of Canada: The First Four Years","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; House of Commons; Parliament; Political science; Humanities; Law; International law; Politics; Art","score_opus":0.01968066658716691,"score_gpt":0.26397860396516215,"score_spread":0.24429793737799524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W320511781","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86424047,0.00047952536,0.000054074244,0.026443006,0.0019944038,0.00017027705,0.000019959045,0.0000037307345,0.10659454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99874526,0.00015220474,0.00002028579,0.00027969823,0.0005207022,0.0000033749839,7.93392e-7,0.0000027024932,0.00027495009],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882895,0.00011842975,0.00021336476,0.000029991666,0.0006508807,0.00015835898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927264,0.0003382223,0.00020050973,0.000061229475,0.00010615343,0.000021229205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016621124,0.00003792417,0.000054894368,0.000015826941,0.00057910604,0.00005950877,0.00042063565,0.000018732808,0.00004825253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010717841,0.000018967072,0.000039839637,0.00007201019,0.00013754741,0.00014239026,0.000020089168,0.00012332492,6.982108e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020982816,0.000047785452,0.050626688,0.0000017710648,0.000045759803,0.0000026669172,0.022386894,0.00023032099,0.00000947072,0.9212804,0.0034847464,0.00186251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002231813,0.00001621378,0.18235488,0.000035263383,0.000012508615,0.000012298316,0.01625101,0.00006056466,0.00009785456,0.0031349116,0.79774535,0.000055956567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38521242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91795105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9181455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000119158205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017225441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6188815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213356300","doi":"","title":"Fallow Fields Initiatives and Canada's East Coast Offshore:Policy and Legal Considerations","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Marine and Offshore Engineering Studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Submarine pipeline; East coast; Political science; Geography; Oceanography; Geology; Physical geography","score_opus":0.007391419750911703,"score_gpt":0.21095798779265398,"score_spread":0.20356656804174228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213356300","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8710531,0.002349932,0.009593008,0.0027015922,0.0010479933,0.00017081585,0.000057997127,0.00023049435,0.11279506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980257,0.00030287183,0.0006671584,0.00034232228,0.0005591235,0.0000015105718,0.0000022206289,0.000020202797,0.00007889405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925774,0.000009902204,0.00022802023,0.00008890008,0.00013434944,0.00028110875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995713,0.00012100853,0.000024866838,0.00006948099,0.00004946138,0.00016388761],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015301806,0.0001509905,0.00018025009,0.00007361237,0.00030563606,0.0001070359,0.00004114719,0.000051092793,0.000018572606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007090528,0.00014252831,0.000021258462,0.000056160727,0.00006508432,0.00016120188,0.00004238592,0.00032007202,4.2875646e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000086805354,0.00013655095,0.055764664,0.0006595625,0.002091501,0.0054825116,0.012268943,0.025339438,0.0011820382,0.778054,0.0769825,0.041951466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028007883,0.00028509976,0.32542318,0.00023601309,0.00017094608,0.008698523,0.0042399284,0.0071093026,0.0015075197,0.0031169942,0.64453524,0.0018764816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0585541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8746057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8160516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045270262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007498681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94771504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W330011836","doi":"","title":"The EU as an Arctic Power: Analysis of the Competence of the EU in the Arctic by Policy Areas","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arctic; Political science; The arctic; European union; Indigenous; Circumpolar star; Member states; Business; International trade; Oceanography; Ecology","score_opus":0.015715572722268097,"score_gpt":0.3125096319193878,"score_spread":0.2967940591971197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W330011836","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67022175,0.0019310848,0.000013831325,0.21468589,0.0006866937,0.00048619078,0.000045591125,0.00001636174,0.111912586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955992,0.00046915284,0.000016143042,0.0032515458,0.00034899655,0.0000049768196,3.9960608e-7,0.000009732292,0.00029985062],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964062,0.0014912944,0.00045737455,0.00012323445,0.0009191726,0.0006027385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979359,0.00073630025,0.0005424393,0.0005232782,0.00013362576,0.00012845336],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027649659,0.0001502173,0.0002974329,0.00007421136,0.0029880367,0.00009487648,0.0015717451,0.00006937139,0.00006434849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00077884895,0.000058974205,0.00035070535,0.0015805766,0.0022439463,0.0002209181,0.00018337341,0.0005123752,0.000004540667],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002686169,0.00024181657,0.17886505,0.000009329949,0.00059067283,0.0000014451077,0.12455873,0.00004170777,0.00003722608,0.6935047,0.0015522932,0.00057016785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031656263,0.000077813966,0.78045833,0.000083862134,0.0007035428,0.000047452446,0.065116465,0.000025013418,0.000044484223,0.016374601,0.13654879,0.00020308935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05202193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044087987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6771301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000118707954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022551975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W337012207","doi":"","title":"\"The harshness and injustice of the common law rule...has frequenly been commented upon\": DebatingContributory Negligence in Canada, 1914-1949","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Legislation; Political science; Plaintiff; Common law; Statute; Injustice; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01586883990437358,"score_gpt":0.2562552275807659,"score_spread":0.24038638767639234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W337012207","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9522354,0.0004980197,0.000055377484,0.025647385,0.00035895067,0.00049979094,0.000060483268,0.00001421471,0.020630404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982346,0.000085295665,0.00006370951,0.0013654989,0.00012927262,0.000019535926,0.0000014806276,0.00000869378,0.00009190378],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833196,0.00033889382,0.00040890623,0.00011590168,0.00042193165,0.00038238545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864495,0.0005029776,0.00029993948,0.00021727152,0.00017428375,0.00016058913],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007959752,0.00010067221,0.0001674128,0.0000128767415,0.0029887813,0.00030120663,0.00066530675,0.000055502962,0.00004458853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009670196,0.00006623785,0.000041297997,0.0002025902,0.0005271664,0.0002497519,0.00013603718,0.00044818548,0.000003370565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016831298,0.000105699546,0.04728346,0.000019580453,0.000052027062,0.000010133829,0.00667243,0.00016145778,0.00084269186,0.93155634,0.0042387014,0.00904063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012114027,0.000056539717,0.15516236,0.0002373037,0.00009199358,0.000041363197,0.01602229,0.0009099045,0.0009660101,0.048280276,0.7765166,0.0005039075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98225105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9973802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8832761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030237128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064693706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W338868633","doi":"","title":"Hugh Kindred and the Teaching of International Law in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Casebook; International law; Law; Jurisprudence; Scholarship; Political science; Sociology; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011404476398589103,"score_gpt":0.26646690920813165,"score_spread":0.25506243280954255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W338868633","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.560708,0.00014913279,0.00005806456,0.006222393,0.001342304,0.000073254276,0.000008718716,0.000004082184,0.43143407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984031,0.000039990104,0.000117491145,0.0006514498,0.0005883968,0.0000011913384,0.0000017928971,0.0000033427204,0.00019328947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990197,0.00019092693,0.00018827854,0.00004046703,0.00040615897,0.00015450873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995713,0.00015272692,0.00012769602,0.000033717908,0.00006067752,0.000053861113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013086058,0.000040424482,0.00007635923,0.000019352045,0.00039726534,0.000051850628,0.00017641681,0.000022349504,0.00007016906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008909157,0.000029305073,0.000024505985,0.000029772767,0.00014754334,0.0003329953,0.00002596792,0.0002116456,0.0000010250268],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017416207,0.000012569707,0.022255842,7.268203e-7,0.000011584482,0.0000017842153,0.0041779988,0.00001255951,0.000011865053,0.9726234,0.00010357749,0.00077066943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029519452,0.00001650067,0.09298712,0.000098824064,0.00002770141,0.000089499794,0.010317603,0.00026693224,0.00023731547,0.039212633,0.853548,0.0002459046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9593634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9868404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93341076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001918475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016666023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3055484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W341238104","doi":"","title":"Law's Treatment of Science: From Idealization to Understanding","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Scientific evidence; Political science; Consistency (knowledge bases); Law; Humanities; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.07659995695760385,"score_gpt":0.35944422057783837,"score_spread":0.2828442636202345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W341238104","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6696873,0.00035169598,0.036282524,0.006054926,0.0023266184,0.0006860629,0.000024123103,0.0001328509,0.28445393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958982,0.0000756777,0.0032240828,0.00032163496,0.00030600515,0.0000039750407,9.699895e-7,0.000009932254,0.00015956465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826723,0.00007861015,0.00028375225,0.00017498039,0.00087482826,0.00032056903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989847,0.00015676573,0.00017230771,0.00014205945,0.00027223537,0.0002719153],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005774425,0.000087481596,0.00016000893,0.00013068435,0.0017876833,0.00051144813,0.00036902976,0.00004981891,0.0007813246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014498344,0.00007113993,0.000049158938,0.0006433793,0.0007655151,0.0007012947,0.0000361097,0.000056715824,0.000086502565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000126731875,0.000084880776,0.00063796586,0.0000019940542,0.000016926952,0.000006757457,0.024263676,0.00021429331,0.0014480326,0.9634809,0.0008334155,0.008998466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010685783,0.000512276,0.004426338,0.00016709155,0.00005929119,0.000016052101,0.035886,0.00008454631,0.005370965,0.7570319,0.19493903,0.00043789664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011270246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009873988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3262109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052817585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026981637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99951184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7056734645","doi":"","title":"Gender According to World Athletics: The Regulation of Racialized Athletes from the Global South","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Magnetic confinement fusion research","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Athletes; Privilege (computing); Power (physics); Civilization; Gender relations; Global South","score_opus":0.023731288851022807,"score_gpt":0.2878220616891836,"score_spread":0.2640907728381608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7056734645","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5817782,0.0014096164,0.018351734,0.021425717,0.0017504812,0.0011326041,0.0004242651,0.00007466225,0.3736527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99722606,0.0000040719196,0.00045683217,0.0002532432,0.0012123241,0.000011836543,0.000010505906,0.000012059764,0.000813041],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861425,0.00014194279,0.00032886886,0.00016350987,0.0005003641,0.0002510549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991678,0.00026728766,0.000091831775,0.00027498443,0.00010875014,0.0000893226],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005591071,0.00012151509,0.00014048298,0.000035562858,0.000391584,0.00043333636,0.00041085898,0.00001930309,0.03232872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018839006,0.00006776681,0.00014762253,0.0003721524,0.00008080165,0.000033901408,0.00019781738,0.00028332853,0.000073826304],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001102397,0.00006624875,0.02502784,0.000019685232,0.00032747872,0.000008187498,0.004530029,0.00025207343,0.0050979783,0.3671857,0.027607562,0.56976694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011462771,0.00008645171,0.048174065,0.00033786497,0.00026375047,0.0000081011785,0.008152554,0.004359243,0.0016410324,0.055929232,0.8795137,0.00038775016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012110481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004493377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8519061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015830172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008422252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96855587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W751532157","doi":"","title":"Slipping between Danger, Pleasure and the Law: Thoughts on Three Recent Books Addressing Sexuality","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human sexuality; Sociology; Pleasure; Feminist legal theory; Supreme court; Law; Oppression; Jurisprudence; Gender studies; Feminism; Political science; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.060149122344419874,"score_gpt":0.31815164927915457,"score_spread":0.2580025269347347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W751532157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12754017,0.0042668064,0.0012627292,0.05039489,0.0029783593,0.0007988529,0.0000368854,0.00029912323,0.81242216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821683,0.00077985274,0.0003867383,0.0051036314,0.010776682,0.0000065322483,0.0000042248957,0.000024584608,0.0007494137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971992,0.0010339109,0.00029567746,0.0002288362,0.00078149966,0.00046089545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870205,0.00045104878,0.00024405637,0.00022366752,0.00015054489,0.00022865029],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004355248,0.00017054888,0.00029234463,0.000005129118,0.005994882,0.0006786724,0.0004189352,0.00022119972,0.000053634787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018790508,0.00010369701,0.00012814713,0.00011722749,0.0012566965,0.00028154624,0.00007662252,0.0009051688,0.000010482315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007331984,0.00004717646,0.0010713427,0.000020535257,0.00013054961,0.0000071739096,0.058841422,0.0000140215125,0.000034801462,0.8895936,0.006956518,0.04320955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001003867,0.000035549114,0.0007583661,0.000110110275,0.000067088746,0.000012292428,0.004187169,0.000012154184,0.00006173501,0.07613772,0.9174187,0.00019521521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008659319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011942689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9104622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007886945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056496705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99529916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W772136316","doi":"","title":"The Structure of Dialogue: Exploring Habermas' Discourse Theory to Explain the \"Magic\" and Potential of Restorative Justice Processes","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Communicative action; Humanities; Epistemology; Restorative justice; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020523470652013275,"score_gpt":0.28093022178596144,"score_spread":0.2604067511339482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W772136316","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9805748,0.0018277551,0.00037486615,0.009273386,0.0010216634,0.00048623717,0.0000424459,0.000019785875,0.006379069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972732,0.0011943459,0.00022708777,0.00025713225,0.0007428286,0.000008191207,0.0000010512879,0.000009516917,0.00028662453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984095,0.0004515633,0.00025815144,0.0001152936,0.0004890681,0.00027643202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985839,0.00043114187,0.00025460462,0.00014505182,0.00046119335,0.000124088],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008225788,0.00011246813,0.00015757911,0.000006020963,0.0023980432,0.0002370699,0.00047601617,0.000074850745,0.000079095626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046348287,0.0000551842,0.00006545993,0.000231034,0.001397879,0.0006291514,0.00008686561,0.00034554434,0.0000023524524],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000098065946,0.00005747636,0.00020461495,0.00008015306,0.00013931915,0.0000063463026,0.48467785,0.00025560317,0.0058993953,0.49668774,0.0058842027,0.00600925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004442894,0.00013944098,0.0014039446,0.00015323877,0.00020518154,0.00003630141,0.80168235,0.000006310059,0.0038064483,0.14510573,0.04675576,0.0002609735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003948649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002749571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.351582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022167984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013123851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W786547374","doi":"","title":"Common Resource or Private Right: Contested Claims to Seaweed in 19th Century Prince Edward Island","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"American Environmental and Regional History","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cove; Shore; Quarter (Canadian coin); Law; Archaeology; Geography; Fishery; History; Oceanography; Political science; Geology","score_opus":0.006315527656006739,"score_gpt":0.20729199863452852,"score_spread":0.20097647097852178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W786547374","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91822654,0.000057299596,0.00054264104,0.0011996723,0.0002219646,0.0002863095,0.0000106631,0.000043194705,0.0794117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904151,0.00004652407,0.0008911526,0.004043937,0.00017372624,0.000008289791,0.000007763113,0.000036857753,0.0043766373],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804956,0.00020217862,0.0003884596,0.0003431818,0.00052703015,0.0004895643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990555,0.00007679425,0.00018751745,0.00028036375,0.0000033949375,0.00039639586],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003921311,0.00023049295,0.00030554907,0.00005248363,0.00040464895,0.000028847848,0.00047749933,0.00008036333,0.0014020011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013605316,0.00016329651,0.00008361617,0.00021417784,0.00095637946,0.00018062102,0.00029634533,0.0004676036,0.0005968625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0056585777,0.0039737914,0.587508,0.00011304715,0.00022713972,0.0034283192,0.024677698,0.040849473,0.039863966,0.0075459555,0.11321393,0.17294006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078826724,0.00028385766,0.052228816,0.000057120287,0.000009854022,0.0003247623,0.0002962382,0.000121763835,0.0001700662,0.00020803369,0.94521767,0.00029355387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006975278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042847204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8320038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045034988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009659521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W789726164","doi":"","title":"Environmental Goals and Sustainable Prosperity Act","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prosperity; Government (linguistics); Environmental law; Political science; Context (archaeology); Accountability; Corporate governance; Public administration; Environmental studies; Legislature; Civil society; Sustainable development; Law; Sociology; Management; Economics; Geography; Politics","score_opus":0.007567722227402739,"score_gpt":0.2424458437110027,"score_spread":0.23487812148359996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W789726164","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93771183,0.00028415504,0.00002133317,0.000110601024,0.00014554175,0.00021675052,0.000006601416,0.000017050386,0.061486162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975974,0.00014220315,0.00041219912,0.00047391353,0.00023812432,0.000010255421,0.0000041517046,0.000023452358,0.0010982803],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981012,0.000116716845,0.00020986576,0.00016935173,0.00053919415,0.0008637072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921185,0.000018490646,0.00010962188,0.00014243058,0.000001809064,0.00051582605],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000878383,0.00018651634,0.00016832449,0.000014902937,0.000989069,0.00012534027,0.00016616267,0.00008507685,0.005816273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010957256,0.0001592122,0.000066406115,0.000057527555,0.00039602182,0.0014287783,0.00040959474,0.0003034305,0.00028591827],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015637172,0.00037874072,0.98366207,0.00000479396,0.000026728561,0.000028781064,0.0014394004,0.000011226197,0.0049141496,0.00086463586,0.00082668813,0.007827176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067286176,0.000095959826,0.9214079,0.0000051520715,0.000048037662,0.0003307237,0.0020333265,0.000018188737,0.0012735435,0.0013308453,0.07247135,0.00031215546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003237076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004146373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.071644664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004894523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005833919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W793228858","doi":"","title":"Will the Rotterdam Rules Be Accepted? A Liner Cargo Interest Perspective","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Liability; Convention; Welfare economics; Business; Law; Humanities; Art; Economics","score_opus":0.049441908670284855,"score_gpt":0.2745321735469091,"score_spread":0.22509026487662426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W793228858","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23437242,0.0012388579,0.0039310143,0.042837482,0.00823567,0.00044626035,0.000055930523,0.0002532241,0.70862913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97134894,0.000036833953,0.00016593725,0.011462339,0.016414508,0.000006949469,0.000015532518,0.000037022026,0.0005119529],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986924,0.000025402516,0.00031585895,0.00016130909,0.00035591758,0.00044913287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905384,0.00007143954,0.00027015907,0.00019552564,0.00036791005,0.00004112832],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046243897,0.00020186021,0.00018116928,0.000098684344,0.0006288998,0.00078859867,0.0005729814,0.00007011534,0.0016905966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001843294,0.00013060268,0.00017286214,0.00011354269,0.0002899712,0.0026793706,0.00020944982,0.00047502414,0.000245112],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035908703,0.00015713272,0.004320832,0.0000134528145,0.00012104022,0.000020012854,0.0006594638,0.000023996432,0.00006900179,0.9691706,0.024642456,0.0007661454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007076429,0.00002098784,0.012478331,0.000059465536,0.00013373622,0.00017542782,0.0029060184,0.0004195917,0.000057962516,0.029607942,0.9530772,0.00035571665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008474825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006586213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9395626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009285859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015383608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W812575852","doi":"","title":"The Land Tenure System in the Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Regulatory Regime: Review, Analysis and Current Issues","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Political science; Geography; Environmental protection; Humanities; Law","score_opus":0.01453286674212879,"score_gpt":0.3035591572751077,"score_spread":0.2890262905329789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W812575852","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17914759,0.50145817,0.00015751446,0.2551513,0.00095289067,0.0010349086,0.000021328658,0.00009141274,0.061984852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93925524,0.058979727,0.000030494813,0.0005854737,0.00082359713,0.0000064117826,7.916397e-7,0.000006500293,0.00031173835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821794,0.0007414145,0.0002641118,0.00014608628,0.00034709478,0.00028333193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991684,0.0003119661,0.00017362724,0.00018888924,0.000055887638,0.00010120932],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031552098,0.00011471657,0.00028751494,0.000046990583,0.0025484615,0.00023845812,0.00021259631,0.000046976857,0.0000049436585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015733283,0.00005430775,0.00007360179,0.0003326779,0.0006479698,0.00010843749,0.000054374275,0.00029218852,0.0000022733536],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000359691,0.000048638954,0.39931163,0.00044161757,0.00055124296,0.0000354902,0.041778233,0.000002487527,5.8446716e-7,0.43267554,0.050338402,0.07478016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019513676,0.000021962143,0.15670884,0.00036680335,0.00032403797,0.00005445649,0.0052633304,0.000029729024,1.06457804e-7,0.0017210552,0.83520967,0.00010490869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005342478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1270586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7848712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044842265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030459414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W828063601","doi":"","title":"Feeling Relational: The Use of Buddhist Meditation in Restorative Practices","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meditation; Restorative justice; Buddhism; Humanities; Emptiness; Economic Justice; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; Ethnology; Psychology; Law; Criminology; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.13634336597522256,"score_gpt":0.35804567402626086,"score_spread":0.2217023080510383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W828063601","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9404575,0.00047874806,0.00011549637,0.04335113,0.0007586376,0.00047124352,0.000004461603,0.000027633794,0.014335105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995899,0.0002851304,0.0027340478,0.00023371412,0.00044420743,0.000013365556,0.000001935343,0.0000060618013,0.00038252253],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828744,0.00055179955,0.00032169974,0.0000891525,0.0005640519,0.0001858644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973488,0.0012980363,0.0007352189,0.00006266263,0.0004971352,0.000058136007],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009955621,0.0000720341,0.00012162594,0.000028866589,0.0013221119,0.00020136808,0.00015849079,0.00006409224,0.00016148709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035010315,0.000044604894,0.000047986363,0.00021689932,0.00044233858,0.0017634914,0.000031772754,0.00034498342,0.000026955067],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006930625,0.00021729908,0.055739034,0.000020305744,0.00019566769,0.000020864387,0.56081307,0.005606886,0.00090438727,0.3454827,0.025324132,0.0056063756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064542,0.00007113909,0.25121218,0.00014063712,0.000051869396,0.0000108281665,0.10524049,0.0007603516,0.000055790788,0.008851962,0.63268113,0.0002781977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053249422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062493157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.607357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016170827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006675983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W844255714","doi":"","title":"Confidential Information and Governments: Balancing the Public's Right to Access Government Records and an Oil and Gas Company's Right to Protect Its Confidential Information","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Business; Legislation; Government (linguistics); Freedom of information; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.009175805422242464,"score_gpt":0.2276828582247249,"score_spread":0.21850705280248242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W844255714","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.777817,0.000024173149,0.010934871,0.019742863,0.0017391985,0.0007526167,0.000047212605,0.00009707575,0.188845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.963,0.000031506966,0.00016494835,0.03554634,0.0010652203,0.000034600856,0.000039338232,0.000012178996,0.000105840874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980944,0.00004535984,0.0005544511,0.00015457394,0.00087899336,0.00027225263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989816,0.000030580497,0.0004529383,0.00013028776,0.00029668075,0.00010791084],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000916773,0.00020561197,0.00018140102,0.000119619304,0.0009537657,0.006043952,0.00030316197,0.000058909132,0.00035209133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013302799,0.0001529555,0.000032237942,0.00014261113,0.000065968736,0.013181294,0.00029756,0.00021580062,0.000094312236],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041138445,0.00010827034,0.0029372314,0.00024243048,0.00015791318,0.0000066750563,0.0010813994,0.000119254444,0.0009120437,0.93406844,0.01439965,0.045555335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014638717,0.000089130765,0.0039422726,0.00009000394,0.000047253758,0.00011471896,0.00032667624,0.015327696,0.00045896877,0.0019736448,0.9758513,0.00031446107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00056407263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016520057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96145165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009261873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019482344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99498785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W849994986","doi":"","title":"Developments. in Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Royalties:From Hibernia to Hebron and Back","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Marine and Offshore Engineering Studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"White paper; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.00513320832992007,"score_gpt":0.18747355374752708,"score_spread":0.18234034541760702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W849994986","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9832197,0.0006957878,0.0010490117,0.00015415231,0.00036778953,0.00008720901,0.0000073198175,0.000070240385,0.014348825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939807,0.000319872,0.004921285,0.00021147067,0.0002720949,0.0000043648806,0.0000047713793,0.000038728667,0.0002466791],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991691,0.00001705339,0.00024195848,0.00015255311,0.0001284877,0.00029084887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996323,0.000058011698,0.000020364747,0.00009884031,0.000020099975,0.00017036474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015954897,0.00019114856,0.00025678944,0.00008827991,0.00010110549,0.00011137414,0.00009198949,0.00006075568,0.000044219993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019752846,0.00017649018,0.000018371496,0.00008512682,0.000027423688,0.0001103774,0.00008917601,0.00025819527,0.00002783658],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010914819,0.00007417367,0.71835685,0.00034337648,0.0004481621,0.00013820722,0.010675759,0.019517854,0.0009373963,0.005129971,0.01167924,0.23258989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00097272935,0.00007086202,0.5788372,0.0001283742,0.000017496237,0.000057585454,0.00008300243,0.0036059269,0.00007575846,0.00027290135,0.4154666,0.000411543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008409143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011168264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40378737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006095915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006349629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71970606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W858437278","doi":"","title":"From Idea to Practice: Sustainable Development Efforts in Manitoba","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainable development; Political science; Legislation; Nova scotia; Humanities; Earth Summit; Round table; Ethnology; Sociology; Business; Law; Session (web analytics); Art","score_opus":0.011147818676403652,"score_gpt":0.27278820749117244,"score_spread":0.2616403888147688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W858437278","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9520156,0.00005648573,0.00029858184,0.00041496972,0.00040267274,0.0002042561,0.0000023707646,0.000016131755,0.04658895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873669,0.00001613778,0.009497751,0.001939425,0.00032863035,0.000014535951,0.000006292434,0.000023780509,0.0008065615],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998042,0.000100095676,0.00032625845,0.00016933677,0.00055541814,0.00080693053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918485,0.000054817807,0.0001231179,0.00014070467,0.00000602396,0.0004904708],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000759112,0.00016820848,0.00016552646,0.000035410314,0.0004529869,0.00011901962,0.00023897024,0.000074609154,0.0017587245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047294816,0.00015281362,0.000041645184,0.00017280615,0.000061726045,0.0015220459,0.00036774424,0.00030768922,0.0012046341],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014954046,0.0018094992,0.91594046,0.000010417479,0.00009274262,0.0009156799,0.033033986,0.00069249835,0.00339986,0.0014518844,0.010003798,0.03249962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004465966,0.00004817693,0.4839519,0.000017351626,0.000015567839,0.00007085371,0.010749212,0.000002768872,0.0011799808,0.0007631685,0.5024737,0.0002807295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0084032295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031778945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4924699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012448023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017684224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W862080893","doi":"","title":"Costs Immunity: Banishing the \"Bane\" of Costs from Public Interest Litigation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public interest; Humanities; Political science; Public order; Welfare economics; Sociology; Law; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0461253407968256,"score_gpt":0.2948359846570084,"score_spread":0.2487106438601828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W862080893","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8848998,0.00014480046,0.00035372452,0.027352646,0.00027137264,0.00024854022,0.000026318303,0.000035144112,0.08666765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998359,0.00009881286,0.00022771984,0.00062083185,0.00051410816,0.000013244202,0.000012931852,0.000010082391,0.00014321788],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874157,0.00029662292,0.00029889343,0.00009512903,0.00031751272,0.0002502479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987598,0.0003004725,0.0002580766,0.00022637249,0.00029762142,0.00015767627],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007828018,0.00007644057,0.00011316511,0.000025333293,0.0016104042,0.0008304624,0.00065096165,0.00007044029,0.00084518734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018943298,0.00005510343,0.000075141026,0.0001885224,0.0003397241,0.0007897665,0.000102508144,0.00043789987,0.000105186795],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030286328,0.00007768537,0.0024188764,0.0000020459054,0.00004159798,0.0000015331985,0.0068172626,0.000002093341,0.0023294692,0.95422107,0.0026390378,0.03144632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057082355,0.000058111127,0.031038348,0.000135131,0.00004640905,0.000018893528,0.02747377,0.00020396277,0.0014302568,0.05875606,0.8799619,0.0003063205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056533817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048383504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89546496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015718328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000115802046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W881314250","doi":"","title":"Getting Past the Gatekeepers: The Reception of Restorative Justice in the Nova Scotian Criminal Justice System","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Criminal justice; Nova scotia; Criminology; Economic Justice; Political science; Theory of criminal justice; Sociology; Law; Ethnology","score_opus":0.039525560698045144,"score_gpt":0.31435203628153563,"score_spread":0.2748264755834905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W881314250","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94743687,0.00044760594,0.0021532492,0.010111162,0.0028321245,0.0005515077,0.0000051401025,0.00003617869,0.036426153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99687696,0.00014291267,0.00015059087,0.0007790023,0.0019258776,0.000018354216,0.0000013580021,0.0000108361955,0.000094093804],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99671924,0.0014575137,0.000500045,0.00016531232,0.00076776266,0.00039012588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99774617,0.0009194682,0.00044307476,0.0002922926,0.00052509014,0.000073907824],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003434139,0.00013983322,0.00019098242,0.00008909649,0.0034142681,0.000541373,0.00079423765,0.00008088638,0.00018753012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037109875,0.0000707029,0.00015464447,0.00082919956,0.00055216526,0.00046307975,0.000047998077,0.0007207525,0.0000713957],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000092141694,0.0002404407,0.0003724074,0.00037182216,0.00015052757,0.000054955846,0.8688721,0.0027213823,0.0006537916,0.07004907,0.009068007,0.047353346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011978708,0.00005742046,0.0010073885,0.00014055471,0.0020644935,0.00010802247,0.9920283,0.0006289036,0.000015368927,0.000110708126,0.0036177246,0.00010133031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053615443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10031482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12315619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017117265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011859419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99788314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W900759554","doi":"","title":"OSCOLA: The Oxford University Standard for Citation of Legal Authorities","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Legal citation; Legal writing; Law; Style (visual arts); Legal research; Hegemony; Consistency (knowledge bases); Political science; Sociology; Black letter law; Art; Literature; Computer science; Comparative law","score_opus":0.03368112788637235,"score_gpt":0.30446958736270824,"score_spread":0.2707884594763359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W900759554","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6378421,0.00027573595,0.008018023,0.011753666,0.0009898592,0.0005175044,0.00008192609,0.000027650418,0.3404935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99648565,0.0001367938,0.0005359569,0.000089436886,0.00029174934,0.0000025409656,0.0000011580821,0.0000028205757,0.0024538732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993248,0.00009936257,0.00012180196,0.0000526755,0.00027462415,0.00012672154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989909,0.00022104123,0.000114419025,0.000037946204,0.0005991716,0.00003653843],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042025608,0.00004572192,0.00009529135,0.000025682566,0.0014184937,0.00010353517,0.00018617774,0.000021141432,0.00018126234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007578444,0.00003318985,0.000077100914,0.000075688564,0.00031469358,0.00043687914,0.000024065243,0.00008585913,0.0000023195064],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003449166,0.000010941772,0.00049166434,0.000002470808,0.000040343162,5.6651373e-7,0.0046560653,0.000009221557,0.000040953408,0.983317,0.0103221,0.0010741671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021925467,0.000091571266,0.0023748905,0.000011888672,0.0000138879695,0.0000013946335,0.021684267,0.000024188428,0.00010694518,0.020819742,0.9546055,0.00004645223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025993406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010347338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9624973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000069741036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008564414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W904336888","doi":"","title":"Reply to Edmond & Roach and Susan Haack's Replies to Law's Treatment of Science: From Idealization to Understanding","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Idealization; Subject (documents); Law; Psychology; Scientific evidence; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Political science; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.06431148602138019,"score_gpt":0.3498896242850279,"score_spread":0.2855781382636477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W904336888","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92146903,0.0002234574,0.010467847,0.02000116,0.00081885286,0.00084966427,0.000025490821,0.000083024286,0.04606145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98786265,0.000080106016,0.009311043,0.0020793234,0.000277211,0.0000116316305,0.0000012881914,0.000016926662,0.00035980126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774516,0.00009386877,0.00040121586,0.00038933443,0.00093835633,0.00043204235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984266,0.00018947365,0.00016917732,0.00027538318,0.000341494,0.0005978389],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097497046,0.00014230974,0.00025736156,0.0002461759,0.0018958338,0.0010040677,0.00039273102,0.000052841788,0.00024157205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036271522,0.000120138444,0.00004185049,0.0009505687,0.0004889245,0.0007031807,0.00011203736,0.00007032618,0.00004095618],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019910056,0.00031114992,0.006687534,0.000017104605,0.0000831088,0.000037862803,0.17633614,0.0014777988,0.007899274,0.7441628,0.0262106,0.036577556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001378274,0.0019515066,0.019903826,0.00046505017,0.000110546265,0.000048162456,0.08202669,0.000063834035,0.009886915,0.23415233,0.64901394,0.0009989461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017430615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011752896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62280333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050749077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021800984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99940354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W919743085","doi":"","title":"Restorative Justice: Reflections on Theory and Practice from within the Nova Scotia Community University Research Alliance","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Alliance; Conceptualization; Sociology; Nova scotia; Economic Justice; Political science; Psychology; Law; Criminology","score_opus":0.21776419128824523,"score_gpt":0.47940503212936186,"score_spread":0.2616408408411166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W919743085","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10542189,0.00009151352,0.0003435716,0.19618058,0.001405446,0.00033661549,0.000015020556,0.000041352512,0.696164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907756,0.00012388604,0.0016458102,0.004150923,0.00052797253,0.0000015212067,0.0000033338617,0.000008249011,0.0027627454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98747045,0.011546273,0.0001645561,0.00011371154,0.00049355725,0.00021147213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98579484,0.012189988,0.00024847485,0.0002721125,0.0013441782,0.00015042246],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011210155,0.000074415475,0.000077253986,0.000062652856,0.010005795,0.0008609469,0.0004330333,0.00008535993,0.00064747623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010587238,0.000058191916,0.00002204203,0.000786889,0.0011402554,0.0021539705,0.00006919585,0.0035218247,0.00030034996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000111919624,0.00014470165,0.000045550056,0.0000014732359,0.000035727087,0.0000040659174,0.09302473,0.000012988774,0.00011569498,0.8839188,0.022271395,0.00031295203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016513608,0.00007142966,0.0020125178,0.00002652001,0.000047131092,0.000018807903,0.45606697,0.000003918553,0.000017394108,0.059222136,0.48226658,0.0000814602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17529595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15180837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8853537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022139469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078745454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W923940955","doi":"","title":"The Continuum of International Maritime Law and Canadian Maritime Law: Explaining a Complex Relationship","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; International law; Comity; Law; Relation (database); Jurisprudence; Humanities; Jurisdiction; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0179711172558237,"score_gpt":0.2460886986303178,"score_spread":0.2281175813744941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W923940955","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0819295,0.00023137966,0.000081795304,0.0028876828,0.00073284796,0.00016364342,0.00008119848,0.000025889132,0.91386604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943235,0.000022838825,0.0020732838,0.0018770834,0.00037759126,0.000007235751,0.000027355954,0.000024244511,0.0012668702],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823684,0.00013714099,0.0004315768,0.00015783391,0.000532327,0.0005043094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988406,0.0003752409,0.0001964858,0.00017129775,0.000060178016,0.00035623435],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009987954,0.00015744488,0.00016563754,0.00003747706,0.0011291652,0.00024750127,0.00046221356,0.00008761237,0.0031317302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009157634,0.00013377634,0.000072041184,0.00007488097,0.0007774973,0.0008032495,0.00021554758,0.00038156947,0.00017872555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028066082,0.00004011144,0.12751412,0.0000027949366,0.000051570325,0.000021506128,0.0006439488,0.00002002385,0.00024110009,0.8670452,0.0039039776,0.00048755843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000621263,0.000047200374,0.25010493,0.000048193957,0.000030162057,0.0008307734,0.00025498387,0.0004119011,0.00020442193,0.023760207,0.72341853,0.0002674428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16451563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5788599,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9125992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024049882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018073932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99777955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W936839938","doi":"","title":"The Effects of Regulated Discretion on Police Referrals to Restorative Justice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Nova scotia; Discretion; Political science; Legislation; Economic Justice; Context (archaeology); Criminal justice; Humanities; Criminology; Law; Sociology; Ethnology; Geography; Art","score_opus":0.018055785241220788,"score_gpt":0.31665551014177823,"score_spread":0.2985997249005574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W936839938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9734819,0.000089056855,0.00087015354,0.0027694602,0.0009446589,0.00026492847,0.0000016354057,0.000028272108,0.021549923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99724066,0.00022677147,0.000097367054,0.00042937885,0.0004544658,0.000013579104,6.851428e-7,0.000008325333,0.0015287696],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985795,0.00038467225,0.00023685159,0.00011041152,0.0004291706,0.00025936594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984731,0.00061790744,0.00017916174,0.00017027429,0.00038456777,0.00017496114],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052587484,0.00008504677,0.00013523469,0.000075014985,0.0021494993,0.0002217399,0.00024952114,0.000057386173,0.00010184168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004346356,0.000056275112,0.00009319502,0.00046685085,0.00017369764,0.00022269684,0.000019951487,0.00021482393,0.000098882934],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057629624,0.0005702563,0.00015080029,0.0001540861,0.0005279904,0.000032005577,0.36316717,0.0017353243,0.016151547,0.21304801,0.046788298,0.35709822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006434663,0.0015293485,0.0046997867,0.0005206541,0.0016857462,0.000030980158,0.87075746,0.00026972688,0.0043219035,0.0040263915,0.110983424,0.00053109665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06516053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08888142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5075903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010812627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006220417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99914956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}