{"meta":{"query_hash":"3cbe31b13eda","filters":{"venue":"Deakin Law Review"},"cohort_total":7,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":7,"exported":7,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/3cbe31b13eda","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Deakin+Law+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1537485993","doi":"10.21153/dlr2006vol11no1art230","title":"The Stolen Generations - Canada and Australia: the Legacy of Assimilation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deakin Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Law; Project commissioning; Duty of care; Liability; Jurisprudence; Damages; Publishing; Political science; Government (linguistics); Duty; Fiduciary; Tort; Sociology","score_opus":0.04886536736657516,"score_gpt":0.33575195807044494,"score_spread":0.2868865907038698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1537485993","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49901953,0.042072527,0.00077744835,0.083516575,0.00080516847,0.00007248437,0.00013877072,0.000026600006,0.3735709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9558672,0.013856291,0.00032559008,0.0055430075,0.00008409279,0.000014106476,0.000023016937,0.00001612638,0.024270609],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948026,0.0006280366,0.00010157745,0.00041943885,0.002265312,0.0017830076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99653,0.00073684583,0.00029545554,0.00016271742,0.0012922123,0.000982812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025241107,0.0002548426,0.00043186985,0.0018735809,0.03182108,0.009265085,0.0014194734,0.0028539316,0.0038406113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005731904,0.00026925933,0.00030343764,0.0026480842,0.017725386,0.0025999288,0.0060614506,0.0050065247,0.00012991445],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005424971,0.00006593956,0.013847907,0.00026642348,0.0000390317,0.0032072007,0.19183645,0.00040637978,0.0005375031,0.6609521,0.02217964,0.10660713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015091813,0.00006980886,0.08045242,0.0010219475,0.00008170415,0.0014200464,0.19907413,0.000517563,0.00057854905,0.031959992,0.6846329,0.00017579779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9763723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9869186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08322399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08322399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12185113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6038351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1936271412","doi":"10.21153/dlr2009vol14no2art146","title":"Crown Immunity in a Food Crisis: A Consideration of the 2008 Listeriosis Outbreak in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deakin Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Child, Adolescent and Family Mental Health","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Doctrine; Agency (philosophy); Law; Criticism; Fell; Government (linguistics); Political science; Listeria; Public health; Listeria monocytogenes; Sociology; Medicine; History; Biology","score_opus":0.03384199023218695,"score_gpt":0.3054331807311877,"score_spread":0.2715911904990007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1936271412","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22371286,0.026673315,0.00060908584,0.56267834,0.0016324377,0.00019267944,0.00033986697,0.000042927102,0.18411848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85857785,0.0143146785,0.00058289926,0.09658904,0.0005917111,0.000045827852,0.00012715557,0.000024115841,0.029146701],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949008,0.00037944887,0.000091529284,0.00020770224,0.0015903949,0.0028300001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935759,0.0018439557,0.00046683053,0.00008109885,0.0026437792,0.0013885617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003203785,0.00034006897,0.00048526615,0.0021164264,0.028310645,0.01037658,0.0026813324,0.012055551,0.0025783349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011561157,0.0004006508,0.00060531887,0.0032505535,0.009011525,0.0023072714,0.002753373,0.008134498,0.00012658618],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001633521,0.00021697662,0.03870682,0.0005794326,0.00009190817,0.012649903,0.064628504,0.0036138396,0.0011548714,0.47523314,0.3509999,0.051961273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012287998,0.00012379899,0.14553703,0.0011820887,0.00021727502,0.0011373507,0.15443335,0.004195933,0.00073201343,0.037399016,0.6545255,0.00039377017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9948866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15111972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15111972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27944648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9845808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097262663","doi":"10.21153/dlr2010vol15no2art122","title":"Control Orders Post 9-11 and Human Rights in the United Kingdom, Australia and Canada: A Kafkaesque Dilemma?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deakin Law Review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Oxford","keywords":"Human rights; Legislation; Commonwealth; Political science; Terrorism; Law; Jurisprudence; Order (exchange); Convention; Scope (computer science); Dilemma; International human rights law; Public administration; Business","score_opus":0.03113774515172246,"score_gpt":0.32776002449955427,"score_spread":0.2966222793478318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097262663","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18724655,0.03083257,0.00084779545,0.18716332,0.00076902553,0.00012458346,0.0003554126,0.000037371257,0.5926234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89803004,0.012354532,0.0006468121,0.024984248,0.00020506061,0.000054135126,0.00013083403,0.000030509025,0.06356394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98877037,0.0011500544,0.00034166666,0.0006691646,0.0047276723,0.0043410584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886714,0.0029802644,0.0009190762,0.00034296143,0.005325801,0.0017605483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004703816,0.00025378133,0.0005195871,0.002894337,0.014666646,0.013765049,0.0021199912,0.0064193862,0.0069672824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020924011,0.0005553105,0.00040313802,0.004455119,0.015352297,0.0049084863,0.00334029,0.0065073976,0.0003744835],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005968385,0.00005295235,0.006087927,0.00013836303,0.00003509292,0.0005925252,0.017224083,0.00040373678,0.00018256101,0.90593624,0.033074744,0.036212053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009945599,0.0000698347,0.08355819,0.0012637479,0.00011711606,0.00047278393,0.05027029,0.0010628212,0.00068924634,0.06809548,0.7939199,0.00038105858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9935249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12253589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12253589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21225247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8890643},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2230923987","doi":"10.21153/dlr2005vol10no2art297","title":"ANOTHER MODEST PROPOSAL","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deakin Law Review","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Torture; Rhetorical question; Context (archaeology); Law; Mainstream; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; History; Political science; Literature; Human rights; Art; Medicine","score_opus":0.05319497522807289,"score_gpt":0.3641740767031132,"score_spread":0.3109791014750403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2230923987","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044463174,0.0027269118,0.015693177,0.43918654,0.011749825,0.0001551218,0.00026076866,0.00015980491,0.5256216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2587812,0.004625984,0.018793369,0.24791712,0.010502822,0.00078686996,0.0005254592,0.000355211,0.45771205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99422544,0.0018987539,0.00020606897,0.0012391437,0.0016886949,0.00074189535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99282974,0.0026382802,0.00023937473,0.001261356,0.002203815,0.0008274306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008245923,0.00069046026,0.0005101653,0.0014048397,0.005830967,0.0076232804,0.0029792788,0.010654626,0.04793716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019041069,0.00033429707,0.0009926755,0.0008624656,0.013668331,0.011918604,0.004993845,0.012305468,0.014630201],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000996507,0.00001562947,0.00006464677,0.000030023168,0.0000022593501,0.000043358512,0.00047745495,0.00005984006,0.00007390508,0.95232457,0.042015757,0.0048825312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001673629,0.000022580733,0.00024558548,0.00015309337,0.000005906518,0.00008776702,0.0011025944,0.00038091769,0.00012880853,0.40422627,0.5936124,0.00001743811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069231573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061917845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04793716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058898814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010042479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16036576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345100582","doi":"10.21153/dlr2013vol18no2art43","title":"The Legal In/Security of Temporary Migrant Agricultural Work: Case Studies from Canada and Australia","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deakin Law Review","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Bar Association","funders":"","keywords":"Right to work; Dismissal; Notice; Legislation; Labour law; Work (physics); Redress; Business; Repatriation; Law; Labour economics; Political science; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.03702364322765113,"score_gpt":0.31725492240149317,"score_spread":0.28023127917384205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345100582","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8925085,0.02516814,0.00038199272,0.008155297,0.0000923536,0.00013823835,0.00016112116,0.000008743776,0.07338564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9745557,0.014723231,0.00037250397,0.0012500723,0.00002500234,0.00003693623,0.000065968015,0.000007867381,0.008962735],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99517053,0.001191222,0.00015553155,0.00026183965,0.0014519114,0.0017689092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938309,0.0026691996,0.00056603114,0.00016152585,0.0018920908,0.0008801691],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004456496,0.00030219337,0.0005730931,0.0030715098,0.013853444,0.0033895818,0.0017363492,0.0022246672,0.0018172243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008569736,0.00030596435,0.00037164133,0.007866998,0.005793673,0.0010891074,0.0030233343,0.0020229588,0.00010737782],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002393956,0.00045525344,0.1250156,0.0022382836,0.0001355468,0.014254492,0.5034276,0.0020386328,0.0009688077,0.17193598,0.03041378,0.14887656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047640144,0.00014160867,0.25215837,0.0026667335,0.00021457301,0.0024615808,0.52504116,0.0013010225,0.0004722597,0.0029668983,0.21240357,0.00012460885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98975396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99553645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08064096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08064096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08788733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58509386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W247585863","doi":"10.21153/dlr2013vol18no1art58","title":"Police Bargaining Disputes and Third-Party Intervention in Australia: Which Way Forward?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deakin Law Review","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intervention (counseling); Business; Third party; Collective bargaining; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Economics; Psychology; Internet privacy; Computer science","score_opus":0.07817230228492522,"score_gpt":0.41362700906792554,"score_spread":0.3354547067830003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W247585863","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6369228,0.050140377,0.0037828193,0.088637345,0.0005956414,0.00022026956,0.00001978421,0.000023078152,0.2196579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97037506,0.015435585,0.000735124,0.0037738916,0.00011430616,0.00006959928,0.000009347818,0.000010370822,0.009476698],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9732624,0.014924258,0.0009778863,0.0009545269,0.0069534564,0.0029275492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9792804,0.008113028,0.006557669,0.000701139,0.003193791,0.0021539296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017211221,0.00018587416,0.00070736423,0.0021206036,0.00936418,0.0077272556,0.0019571325,0.0033273343,0.005641133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036019184,0.0005373804,0.0004516334,0.0027955237,0.012521321,0.005743166,0.0074965823,0.0053794677,0.00043102156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072461786,0.0005302427,0.028480453,0.0013748872,0.000054588272,0.0020877647,0.41270053,0.0007049744,0.00088147604,0.33986738,0.01226434,0.20098096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006298494,0.00041900692,0.13809171,0.0049206982,0.000073457006,0.0018463479,0.4076733,0.0017667823,0.0005628356,0.06657856,0.37786472,0.00013955672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10657376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11402138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10657376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015004695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03344122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21190685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971206311","doi":"10.21153/dlr2019vol24no1art875","title":"Recommendations on the Optimal Constitutional Recognition of the First Nations in Australia","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deakin Law Review","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Commonwealth; Treaty; Jurisprudence; Equity (law); Law; Legal pluralism; Indigenous rights; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Human rights; Comparative law; Legal realism","score_opus":0.07175335148650308,"score_gpt":0.3638970022578252,"score_spread":0.2921436507713221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971206311","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039994726,0.053107474,0.0038815674,0.82147527,0.025261877,0.0006670843,0.0003831945,0.00018850523,0.09103556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.055258945,0.05611024,0.03772299,0.6712401,0.010328482,0.0025169915,0.0007487163,0.0002216623,0.16585197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9499338,0.022359893,0.0050333384,0.003524109,0.013094178,0.006054718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94546115,0.025185214,0.003154918,0.0023442053,0.0189904,0.004864125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.049076382,0.0013133654,0.0023303009,0.0048338766,0.0059243734,0.0126248,0.006992976,0.030801667,0.014092006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.082832694,0.0014826646,0.0027685566,0.0028292765,0.009946838,0.016162606,0.009865847,0.028411381,0.004003572],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000399317,0.00017605472,0.00069187366,0.0012574242,0.000034701497,0.0004888604,0.0043641627,0.000938412,0.00047563162,0.49102786,0.46504703,0.035458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007396001,0.0000644367,0.0020985857,0.0049453042,0.000054231088,0.00017183153,0.0031542582,0.00045259058,0.0002973284,0.06374202,0.92481524,0.00013019763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0945311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0892982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0945311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012697755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07790946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25954378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}