{"meta":{"query_hash":"3cbe31b13eda","filters":{"venue":"Deakin Law Review"},"cohort_total":7,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":7,"exported":7,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/3cbe31b13eda","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Deakin+Law+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1537485993","doi":"10.21153/dlr2006vol11no1art230","title":"The Stolen Generations - Canada and Australia: the Legacy of Assimilation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deakin Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Law; Project commissioning; Duty of care; Liability; Jurisprudence; Damages; Publishing; Political science; Government (linguistics); Duty; Fiduciary; Tort; Sociology","score_opus":0.04886536736657516,"score_gpt":0.33575195807044494,"score_spread":0.2868865907038698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1537485993","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50477594,0.19215909,0.00004514605,0.24982716,0.0012002898,0.004123176,0.000074063435,0.000082956605,0.04771219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950148,0.0038272543,0.000056688208,0.00046745868,0.00014418885,0.000030159963,0.0000038587973,0.000002430898,0.00045319757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913776,0.00020671006,0.00019505444,0.00007774983,0.00025303863,0.00012968176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946886,0.00020213262,0.00011212908,0.00009680231,0.000098886834,0.000021173326],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004504583,0.000059659866,0.00012051744,0.0000016859589,0.0013486609,0.00006252361,0.00012665402,0.000021203803,0.000029857323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012280607,0.00002887265,0.000034050547,0.00011245683,0.00032881545,0.000103292135,0.000022806475,0.00006080752,0.0000019847155],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.044378e-7,0.000003935689,0.0009368378,0.00005519522,0.0000128797365,3.2710915e-7,0.0001216808,0.000006890709,0.0000066166085,0.9628363,0.034904335,0.0011146581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002459989,0.0000021199824,0.019069733,0.00008930292,0.000035196892,2.6528133e-7,0.000054967313,0.0000025907716,0.000009163427,0.00021751238,0.98045075,0.000043814725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9762426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99214065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9626188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000080612896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007350522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1936271412","doi":"10.21153/dlr2009vol14no2art146","title":"Crown Immunity in a Food Crisis: A Consideration of the 2008 Listeriosis Outbreak in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deakin Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Child, Adolescent and Family Mental Health","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Doctrine; Agency (philosophy); Law; Criticism; Fell; Government (linguistics); Political science; Listeria; Public health; Listeria monocytogenes; Sociology; Medicine; History; Biology","score_opus":0.03384199023218695,"score_gpt":0.3054331807311877,"score_spread":0.2715911904990007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1936271412","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8226568,0.028500285,0.000012959743,0.08522084,0.00017591419,0.0029048831,0.00007518735,0.00002743094,0.06042569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99160206,0.0013257132,0.00003801653,0.0069804676,0.000011657537,0.000031717085,0.0000013986628,0.000002066161,0.0000069063854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990545,0.0002474012,0.00031001717,0.00009209767,0.00016628928,0.00012973156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995351,0.000052127718,0.00011173952,0.00022543826,0.00004674394,0.000028882772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042822392,0.00005551413,0.00018193264,0.000010240126,0.00013692521,0.000018128441,0.00020990282,0.000024946256,0.000047609574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012289152,0.000042083033,0.000044362012,0.00037087683,0.000048827278,0.00007525889,0.00002912738,0.00010471095,0.00000186204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016550811,0.000053078107,0.0012322942,0.00013570243,0.0000034506618,9.661367e-7,0.00056124525,0.0000052882683,0.000017233633,0.9939938,0.0022499743,0.001745294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013807723,0.000013757715,0.045787252,0.0012159544,0.0000138881505,0.0000011073346,0.00018159665,0.000006306095,0.00006826978,0.0023522342,0.95011014,0.00011139491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98392946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9916416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020655632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068945705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17160963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097262663","doi":"10.21153/dlr2010vol15no2art122","title":"Control Orders Post 9-11 and Human Rights in the United Kingdom, Australia and Canada: A Kafkaesque Dilemma?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deakin Law Review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Oxford","keywords":"Human rights; Legislation; Commonwealth; Political science; Terrorism; Law; Jurisprudence; Order (exchange); Convention; Scope (computer science); Dilemma; International human rights law; Public administration; Business","score_opus":0.03113774515172246,"score_gpt":0.32776002449955427,"score_spread":0.2966222793478318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097262663","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953806,0.000007789126,5.793644e-7,0.0034703817,0.00012413955,0.00044264004,0.000015658978,0.000009408933,0.0005488169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99647653,5.973914e-7,0.000013294457,0.0033280533,0.000114285074,0.000023634686,0.000016457543,0.0000039650276,0.000023197135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989043,0.00023948184,0.00021067583,0.00016372994,0.00027516088,0.00020668826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945265,0.00015202953,0.00008055131,0.00012599095,0.00011639341,0.0000723923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006907169,0.00010686442,0.00019515111,0.000031045016,0.0006811634,0.00009476707,0.00023979796,0.000056527897,0.00032103536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042843923,0.000066581146,0.000028259032,0.00007252999,0.0003531063,0.000101577054,0.000013919449,0.00020898908,0.00000434791],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013881958,0.000010527288,0.0004288269,0.00005390136,0.0000065784275,0.000019261961,0.000015437343,4.454909e-8,0.000005293328,0.9987767,0.00068140525,6.4159656e-7],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022922693,0.0000108514805,0.004838832,0.0002426713,0.000026878628,0.000006928401,1.9123424e-7,9.808527e-7,0.0000012153724,0.011039284,0.98350036,0.0001025514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9994195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9877374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003703948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007994121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5239027},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2230923987","doi":"10.21153/dlr2005vol10no2art297","title":"ANOTHER MODEST PROPOSAL","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deakin Law Review","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Torture; Rhetorical question; Context (archaeology); Law; Mainstream; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; History; Political science; Literature; Human rights; Art; Medicine","score_opus":0.05319497522807289,"score_gpt":0.3641740767031132,"score_spread":0.3109791014750403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2230923987","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006622435,0.062892854,0.00020429613,0.065091416,0.0004919347,0.0011049032,0.000008084302,0.00027925457,0.869265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.864362,0.02349294,0.0057144514,0.09525979,0.0031952567,0.0000968544,0.000010655897,0.00006116994,0.007806898],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998789,0.00024556112,0.00020132482,0.00018517743,0.00032073114,0.00025818447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995071,0.000056995235,0.000073793555,0.00021650092,0.00006470009,0.00008088581],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010560474,0.00009541336,0.00021165729,0.000008567248,0.0002882409,0.000046103443,0.00025122863,0.00010191497,0.0013562795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010596872,0.00007708238,0.00010003661,0.00012133937,0.00034888613,0.00018064247,0.000020084937,0.00016763953,0.0006272858],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.968081e-7,0.000023003447,0.000021187048,0.00016171356,0.0000047282156,0.0000016386296,0.00023655334,4.8074185e-7,0.0000023015173,0.9807609,0.008308605,0.010478247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049750488,0.0000073332767,0.00001926314,0.0005050642,0.000021152146,0.000001160276,0.000004064212,0.000003123263,0.000010370944,0.0022811745,0.99698204,0.000115482646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041169613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017928813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98867345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005130805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014881742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345100582","doi":"10.21153/dlr2013vol18no2art43","title":"The Legal In/Security of Temporary Migrant Agricultural Work: Case Studies from Canada and Australia","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deakin Law Review","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Bar Association","funders":"","keywords":"Right to work; Dismissal; Notice; Legislation; Labour law; Work (physics); Redress; Business; Repatriation; Law; Labour economics; Political science; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.03702364322765113,"score_gpt":0.31725492240149317,"score_spread":0.28023127917384205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345100582","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9599437,0.035927635,1.6083847e-8,0.0032711995,0.00013626456,0.00036795504,0.000024189667,0.000004050387,0.0003249523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99307084,0.006117275,0.000011455248,0.00063028006,0.000039704584,0.000028597577,0.000003250051,0.0000018633824,0.000096724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914354,0.00018279723,0.0002391828,0.00010455576,0.00016840435,0.00016150692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995108,0.00015110687,0.0000928848,0.0001057091,0.00008288317,0.00005658324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029687764,0.00007330855,0.00020443538,0.000003821744,0.0002727688,0.00003655807,0.000112152695,0.000021380907,0.00006541167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007151334,0.000037596565,0.000029412146,0.00018325722,0.00020257478,0.0001316322,0.000041769115,0.000074933014,8.5652067e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017202635,0.000042558695,0.030652063,0.0002041643,0.00010662958,0.00017600712,0.0012987652,1.2438244e-7,0.0000046540154,0.8966376,0.06845273,0.0024229658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000672287,0.0000051574625,0.093830556,0.00062152086,0.000022195325,0.0000035146318,0.00055819604,5.2111034e-8,0.000002663481,0.0004616349,0.9043463,0.000080966434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99803305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99746895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.896176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004447896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006699492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20979448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W247585863","doi":"10.21153/dlr2013vol18no1art58","title":"Police Bargaining Disputes and Third-Party Intervention in Australia: Which Way Forward?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deakin Law Review","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intervention (counseling); Business; Third party; Collective bargaining; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Economics; Psychology; Internet privacy; Computer science","score_opus":0.07817230228492522,"score_gpt":0.41362700906792554,"score_spread":0.3354547067830003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W247585863","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89845,0.0037022769,0.000054091193,0.012412491,0.0002761774,0.0013342083,0.000011940187,0.00010833493,0.083650455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99170715,0.0060521443,0.0002501857,0.0013778994,0.00011752002,0.00006932202,0.0000061304336,0.0000067139867,0.0004129505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988112,0.0003415256,0.0002709704,0.00016465038,0.00014697626,0.00026467835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942994,0.00015421938,0.00011214262,0.00013525797,0.00006226377,0.000106170424],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010470881,0.000089904795,0.0002089559,0.000029734569,0.0002190911,0.000120403536,0.00013612035,0.00006760088,0.0010828953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013591375,0.00007666663,0.000061257604,0.00029538592,0.000100384044,0.0006629556,0.000045226516,0.00016037891,0.0003352261],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002019484,0.000089953886,0.0102925915,0.00089401647,0.000024691186,6.622161e-7,0.00963093,0.0000015306257,0.000043551965,0.9521114,0.010133531,0.016775094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017999364,0.000035390723,0.059123002,0.0032539512,0.000060727678,0.000004281512,0.00037018824,0.000028752704,0.0000035036257,0.0021872756,0.9345391,0.00021382608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7659639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38467816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9499242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039722017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016189557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971206311","doi":"10.21153/dlr2019vol24no1art875","title":"Recommendations on the Optimal Constitutional Recognition of the First Nations in Australia","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deakin Law Review","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Commonwealth; Treaty; Jurisprudence; Equity (law); Law; Legal pluralism; Indigenous rights; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Human rights; Comparative law; Legal realism","score_opus":0.07175335148650308,"score_gpt":0.3638970022578252,"score_spread":0.2921436507713221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971206311","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22506954,0.0010450981,0.000020077852,0.0649883,0.0027253937,0.0052763014,0.00013381412,0.00003271806,0.70070875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98490864,0.012215971,0.00015991842,0.0012843355,0.00013125261,0.000033232827,0.000041468993,0.000003836898,0.0012213318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989968,0.0003118475,0.00025574054,0.0001020063,0.00019183136,0.00014178154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991365,0.00041065353,0.00014259259,0.00016260514,0.00012395962,0.000023661609],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010368753,0.00005443077,0.00010481139,0.000029355102,0.0022189207,0.00001442265,0.00019409695,0.000045512363,0.0018191432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003972183,0.000030560117,0.000062155006,0.00041112537,0.00038509633,0.00009384668,0.0000014559267,0.000121266145,0.00034496863],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.554825e-7,0.000051270257,0.00015553065,0.00012496716,0.000003243069,3.855247e-8,0.0019142635,0.000003124872,7.610491e-8,0.9970152,0.0006865087,0.000045139874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046160243,0.000008486294,0.00046972444,0.0016173371,0.0000102376625,7.64634e-7,0.00005172388,8.115363e-7,0.0000092753835,0.0016027397,0.99613714,0.000045574503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044403736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57726175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9954507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011900433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016072567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99909335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}