{"meta":{"query_hash":"4518145a9e5a","filters":{"venue":"Defense Counsel Journal"},"cohort_total":28,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":28,"exported":28,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/4518145a9e5a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Defense+Counsel+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W1483029253","doi":"","title":"Why the Development of Mass Torts in Canada Is Important to Corporate America: Not Only Are American Manufacturers Liable to Suit in Canada, but That Nation's Class Action Regime Is Developing the Potential for Increased Exposure","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Class action; Punitive damages; Law; Jury; Supreme court; Product liability; Political science; Business; Liability; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.033356526601454266,"score_gpt":0.25253559787557256,"score_spread":0.2191790712741183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1483029253","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96249986,0.000083132625,0.00251647,0.03365502,0.00054714887,0.0005798605,0.000058859714,0.000005349501,0.000054289965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834243,0.00007360295,0.000552325,0.015692128,0.00015450646,0.000035085362,0.0000032274688,0.000015651065,0.000049143313],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973409,0.00013386828,0.00063719304,0.00024181246,0.0011354011,0.00051077997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815565,0.00012787014,0.0009394714,0.00013347309,0.0004302709,0.00021326028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009907563,0.00018188012,0.00033861655,0.00011442927,0.0007353487,0.00013723664,0.00037820797,0.000046441306,0.000017036878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013114432,0.00012940743,0.000047010457,0.0006940045,0.00006692452,0.00016898141,0.000020389252,0.00025601248,7.0924085e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003316574,0.00023579606,0.42011663,0.00035670443,0.0009004709,0.0011229577,0.2376991,0.027989471,0.004390613,0.0011077633,0.2527614,0.050002538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018252241,0.00017077928,0.26238933,0.00070726895,0.000071336,0.00008400762,0.25731817,0.00008749659,0.008216602,0.0020788317,0.46589395,0.0011569721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99891317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99990934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21313259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005043023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031830844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99877644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510858968","doi":"","title":"Pension Plans and Class Actions: The Vivendi Case","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Class action; Pension; Commission; Business; Judgement; Political science; Public administration; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.02570893351656532,"score_gpt":0.22064077908757246,"score_spread":0.19493184557100712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1510858968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9845536,0.0002194579,0.0009647857,0.002652824,0.00072097266,0.000087315515,0.000003740581,0.000039274397,0.01075803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941028,0.00023281756,0.00002369961,0.0034975936,0.001853589,0.000002537309,0.0000027334834,0.000015916323,0.00026832457],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922496,0.000021804779,0.00018705481,0.000135104,0.00022877593,0.0002022938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993044,0.0000859054,0.00027402816,0.00016122112,0.0001544413,0.000019975487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005851777,0.00012318983,0.00011976669,0.00007092953,0.0008022383,0.00055540446,0.00010694159,0.000046167574,0.0001252958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006680508,0.00008087112,0.0000583287,0.000146874,0.00006771238,0.00064468733,0.000039058665,0.00029205854,0.00014749623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067923876,0.00028081375,0.04279474,0.00020719373,0.00023868323,0.008972808,0.0013740796,0.0004765827,0.0030767913,0.29003495,0.5234389,0.12842524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005265131,0.00001459157,0.0048320917,0.000040840474,0.00007384811,0.00908745,0.0005302729,0.0031250573,0.0000063951097,0.0053414935,0.9762653,0.00015610672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017630747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007294971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45282647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016928616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016753811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61702496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1527306418","doi":"","title":"The Test for Causation in Canada: But for, but ... Maybe Not","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Supreme court; Appeal; Law; Test (biology); Confusion; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.04677605707819044,"score_gpt":0.2875057320167952,"score_spread":0.24072967493860475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1527306418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9659694,0.00031687855,0.0042559663,0.023628812,0.00059767126,0.00083035766,0.00019084824,0.000019277839,0.0041907867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953438,0.0008752523,0.00040998863,0.0005972147,0.00050116965,0.00007365379,0.0000028474592,0.000008881375,0.002187187],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897933,0.00003910363,0.00024732755,0.00010019542,0.0003123752,0.00032167367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982621,0.0011262802,0.00013299154,0.000095663636,0.0002747255,0.00010825689],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007934698,0.00006592365,0.000088682275,0.000023645858,0.002329548,0.00008952494,0.00021032998,0.000040308532,0.000010275842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005407425,0.000050927956,0.00005756101,0.00011097956,0.000092251124,0.00009685555,0.000006555628,0.00015136698,0.0000037235152],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052925444,0.00041849667,0.060843904,0.000044962235,0.00014332158,0.00014101223,0.05701002,0.0010533882,0.0031521975,0.3988209,0.43587065,0.041971866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005520398,0.00002707996,0.014909433,0.000008670732,0.000011721229,0.000058173126,0.005060554,0.0005593695,0.000097827535,0.0059167286,0.972666,0.00013238429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5222145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9253759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5367954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005670815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030359065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99896926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1566894743","doi":"","title":"The Evolving Landscape for Pharmaceutical Product Liability Litigation in Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Mass tort; Product liability; Class action; Law; Liability; Business; Tort; Product (mathematics); Law and economics; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.04030235086632047,"score_gpt":0.3866159461024432,"score_spread":0.34631359523612276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1566894743","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94842494,0.0016508896,0.00031217327,0.04394958,0.0018494008,0.000890718,0.000016477272,0.000021213093,0.002884593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99607116,0.00020968224,0.0002563523,0.0011080144,0.0017248979,0.00008719875,0.000009213136,0.000013992843,0.000519479],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99687237,0.00093592616,0.00082617864,0.00020801213,0.0005076574,0.00064988044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930021,0.005756587,0.00027042322,0.000231605,0.0005452023,0.00019403739],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005766963,0.00012246188,0.00020835594,0.000035437402,0.0011189588,0.00004567571,0.00018076417,0.000076380384,0.0004203897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053984947,0.000080124446,0.000055759694,0.00015794554,0.00006375375,0.00017742172,0.00001919152,0.0012659803,0.000018700142],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046870185,0.00013394647,0.626717,0.00030950404,0.000022155245,0.000034814133,0.0015002919,0.00007934533,0.00014659374,0.0024222517,0.3619962,0.006169229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001323913,0.000038300863,0.119366,0.000141475,0.00003649443,0.000031312677,0.0043243617,0.0035195255,0.000030858384,0.008877738,0.86215067,0.00015932585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17366698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6792573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.507351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064840005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036423667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.860624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W168443748","doi":"","title":"Defending against Suits Brought by Illegal Aliens","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Wrongful death; Law; Plaintiff; Tort; Misrepresentation; Jury; Doctrine; Lawsuit; Immigration; Political science; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.014371805943596144,"score_gpt":0.2864605411120291,"score_spread":0.27208873516843296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W168443748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56067955,0.00799041,0.0017302517,0.00781649,0.0030932545,0.00036200875,0.000045738965,0.00028476035,0.4179975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907551,0.0020141418,0.00009249319,0.0023766365,0.0021238357,0.0000018656989,0.0000051688107,0.000017879387,0.002612924],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972769,0.00024364187,0.00045552588,0.0002484474,0.0010106297,0.00076482404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986466,0.00011194908,0.0002860519,0.0001307589,0.00037312898,0.00045150428],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015168162,0.00019615317,0.00029218756,0.00010642311,0.0019716595,0.00070562784,0.00039146308,0.00017741772,0.00015689833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003299607,0.00017840591,0.00016525632,0.00044936154,0.00015446532,0.00069667277,0.000011985237,0.00047301024,0.000117068324],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011968684,0.0003100743,0.001962269,0.000020336396,0.00011104277,0.00055272906,0.046640236,0.000051225634,0.004515525,0.04087444,0.8571786,0.047663826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004414894,0.00008729208,0.00018072431,0.00007872761,0.000023164182,0.00011359809,0.0029845831,0.000010965208,0.00011389184,0.003976596,0.9916798,0.00030920477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004242522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043008727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43007547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021249121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004060288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99932766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W174261786","doi":"","title":"Environmental Prosecutions: Criminal Liability without Mens Rea and Exposure under the Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mens rea; Law; Statute; Indictment; Liability; Doctrine; Officer; Business; Corporate liability; Plaintiff; Corporate title; Damages; Legal liability; Political science; Criminal law; Finance","score_opus":0.0462503031042415,"score_gpt":0.2606485412822747,"score_spread":0.21439823817803322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W174261786","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99491525,0.00084459153,0.0005349559,0.0023702537,0.0001767124,0.00016949225,0.000008900614,0.000025370326,0.00095449144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99487567,0.0004524706,0.0006730901,0.0024426272,0.00012130913,0.000012759232,0.000005197274,0.000013425762,0.0014034683],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981991,0.00040190917,0.00034937105,0.0002319753,0.00040168318,0.00041596766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989979,0.0001550218,0.0002837795,0.00030842153,0.000018867608,0.00023597648],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014201946,0.00019519593,0.00017491927,0.00004690755,0.0007799105,0.000081735256,0.0001869212,0.00010461817,0.0018283116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006689133,0.00013264288,0.00007672281,0.00013064324,0.0008040029,0.00044691403,0.000088661436,0.00045162134,0.00023688022],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037842256,0.00031427835,0.97662634,0.0000062511044,0.000080984064,0.000018292772,0.0026908985,0.00016215684,0.008650287,0.0016176729,0.008158985,0.0012954426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064207887,0.00012077718,0.96329343,0.0000099580375,0.00021727466,0.0017491279,0.0027598112,0.00011678941,0.00038853602,0.0021667096,0.028295862,0.00023966533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022067996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000044425793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020136878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014690639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004856895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109525249","doi":"10.12690/0895-0016-81.1.fmiii","title":"<i>President's Page:</i>IADC Pride: The Global Connection","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Connection (principal bundle); Pride; Law; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.012891224129881279,"score_gpt":0.2075620390018075,"score_spread":0.19467081487192622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109525249","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92446095,0.0006214959,0.0072549293,0.006356409,0.003303707,0.0002337974,0.0000048814977,0.00016595372,0.057597857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98455304,0.00013928617,0.000028747738,0.009997547,0.0048947353,0.0000052629784,0.000005406388,0.000021058802,0.00035490424],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985273,0.000038032256,0.0003351046,0.00020198544,0.00054134644,0.00035622122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987644,0.00006746592,0.0005260245,0.00027485154,0.0003401918,0.000027067066],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010371329,0.0001935598,0.00018195645,0.000051580355,0.0006793265,0.0011309708,0.00036561606,0.000068517,0.00036812274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019597007,0.00013363415,0.0001515336,0.00038185882,0.00007770614,0.0010609413,0.00006434446,0.00031103444,0.0009547944],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003368827,0.00013979043,0.07400012,0.000076839606,0.00012540695,0.0001652182,0.0001380151,0.0005492389,0.0005866045,0.2240862,0.6733805,0.026415218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079291646,0.000014075455,0.02330781,0.00004747611,0.00009507691,0.00031699333,0.00016316106,0.0015214805,0.000017282227,0.04768667,0.92578787,0.00024921662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000254319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045783594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25240737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007231927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044162254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W212664854","doi":"","title":"International Class Actions in the Canadian Context: Standing, Funding, Enforceability and Trial","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Context (archaeology); Jurisdiction; Liability; Law; Class (philosophy); Settlement (finance); Action (physics); Political science; Res judicata; Business; Multinational corporation; Law and economics; Sociology; Finance","score_opus":0.05975093314548166,"score_gpt":0.29075638991564995,"score_spread":0.2310054567701683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W212664854","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56398606,0.00024078156,0.00038602378,0.00805309,0.0049155424,0.0003875304,0.000015613836,0.00003793292,0.42197743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949276,0.0000765181,0.000011156448,0.0024094468,0.0022963558,0.00001398894,0.00001003422,0.000009748714,0.00024516703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882716,0.00003588799,0.00027515343,0.000110073546,0.00035626226,0.0003954838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994363,0.00007246194,0.00016118262,0.00011845481,0.0001410442,0.0000705579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014886128,0.00011734681,0.000114055765,0.00036334185,0.0007747145,0.00094305835,0.0002002525,0.000074113406,0.00074318127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017796556,0.00008971307,0.000079999816,0.00024646698,0.000082790095,0.0013043864,0.000021129357,0.00042740226,0.00007296765],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013958239,0.00040225565,0.10384175,0.00002145096,0.0001246466,0.000031814183,0.001774866,0.000028534192,0.000023301329,0.78075385,0.09946095,0.012140761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036522534,0.0000086904665,0.020718437,0.000012022294,0.000029933697,0.000117608215,0.0024997431,0.00041339197,2.278787e-7,0.00077656395,0.97166175,0.000109360335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010780018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13532788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87220085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003128124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010910237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W224296180","doi":"","title":"Constitution, Crime, Clergy: First Amendment Implications of Sexual Abuse Claims: Church Law and Discipline, Constitutional Limitations, Damage Caps and Statutes of Limitations Raise Perplexing Issues in These Cases","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Statute; Constitution; Statutory law; Sexual abuse; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Political science; Poison control; History; Medicine","score_opus":0.07104623176890848,"score_gpt":0.3335079804758323,"score_spread":0.26246174870692385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W224296180","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9290182,0.0034935195,0.0024091573,0.0017749574,0.00018310372,0.00036234668,0.00056356966,0.000024533141,0.062170602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99091226,0.0056133065,0.002997152,0.0002452117,0.0000698655,0.0000174014,0.000026150885,0.0000060929256,0.00011257844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818957,0.0002864539,0.0006058744,0.00021567736,0.00038801547,0.00031438645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99684036,0.0018396634,0.00030788945,0.00014435017,0.00064037123,0.0002273895],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008081223,0.0001626737,0.00028650407,0.00019715006,0.0011197744,0.00009942827,0.00011812795,0.00008252066,0.000050560317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008375407,0.00016000411,0.00004587201,0.0003026705,0.007386167,0.00043398963,0.000017396202,0.00022188111,0.0000014810419],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023712126,0.00015472165,0.0128944265,0.00002253237,0.000043795866,0.000015182725,0.011971952,0.0003205666,0.00026396956,0.9738083,0.00040841702,0.000072462055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029609436,0.00053922646,0.055516116,0.0005603924,0.00044909792,0.0013610381,0.1368167,0.000090192785,0.00030787,0.060128715,0.7401158,0.0011538921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009807573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035185001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91367954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000117251475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019264473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99531513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W225236535","doi":"","title":"Canadian Price-Fixing Class Actions: The Supreme Court of Canada Gives the Green Light to Indirect Purchaser Claims","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Plaintiff; Damages; Class action; Legislation; Certiorari; Political science; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.01908005545827297,"score_gpt":0.25304099785432815,"score_spread":0.2339609423960552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W225236535","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5162268,0.0014248634,0.00038764437,0.24963386,0.0041152546,0.0008798266,0.0000619002,0.0000459399,0.22722386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99371856,0.000119509445,0.000011053086,0.0026237092,0.0015402087,0.000009708051,5.7987194e-7,0.000014443815,0.001962234],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975733,0.00044397663,0.00035101888,0.00014955457,0.00090698275,0.0005751532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982304,0.00031548194,0.0002523556,0.00020150594,0.0005246883,0.00047555758],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002661773,0.0001325123,0.00021530259,0.000099320925,0.0031490843,0.00026126407,0.000630959,0.00008675163,0.00012422696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043514583,0.00007917073,0.00007968002,0.00050955464,0.00012652323,0.00019252484,0.000018688352,0.00041739852,0.000011153608],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011471647,0.00006749154,0.011058954,0.00008103411,0.00045150443,0.00008703696,0.19890746,0.00048093472,0.0009541515,0.04539834,0.7335991,0.008799233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000099773766,0.000031473228,0.0017787315,0.00005538753,0.00003445877,0.000035270183,0.009563899,0.000021135995,0.00008231055,0.0022832418,0.98588675,0.00012753722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97632205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4774917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057180465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004867033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W227614572","doi":"","title":"Canada's New Consumer Product Legislation: A Shield or a Sword?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Product liability; Consumer protection; Product (mathematics); Law; Business; Legislation; Commission; Plaintiff; Government (linguistics); Parliament; Liability; Commerce; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.09851926336921897,"score_gpt":0.3031498479018137,"score_spread":0.20463058453259475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W227614572","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44757673,0.013584208,0.0030893025,0.08078692,0.011439188,0.0012489333,0.000035064135,0.00028940372,0.44195023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97914505,0.0009258585,0.0009581768,0.0014419174,0.0013556146,0.000002635147,6.087503e-7,0.000012610908,0.01615755],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983007,0.00014200437,0.0002701395,0.00018255929,0.00068760826,0.00041703368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887645,0.00013562567,0.00015480703,0.00016547715,0.00025389358,0.00041371715],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008194214,0.00011904928,0.0001574655,0.000047419624,0.0007750809,0.00015513462,0.0003010427,0.000053842363,0.0031503115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047756487,0.000095055904,0.000060719634,0.00022657386,0.00015031865,0.0003363145,0.000013186741,0.0002997936,0.00005505609],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004447465,0.000053737745,0.0051227068,0.000010304457,0.00006212583,0.0008999489,0.046098784,0.0000023375214,0.00003429297,0.012483585,0.9099509,0.024836514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019668954,0.000043685097,0.0015032032,0.000052861717,0.000046006033,0.00038505136,0.0025716138,0.00000201534,0.000037866866,0.0018817007,0.9931022,0.00017709343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75239927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9525084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5315683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016161348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075078835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99811864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W252615043","doi":"","title":"Class Actions in Canada: 2005 State of the Union: Growing, Expanding, and Developing","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Plaintiff; Legislation; Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.01415921890431619,"score_gpt":0.21302251372267741,"score_spread":0.19886329481836124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W252615043","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9758676,0.00033161274,0.0010653129,0.0043300316,0.00080678705,0.00009241079,0.0000051843326,0.000015459871,0.0174856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982793,0.00015729052,0.00004060093,0.00080674246,0.00026057826,0.000002707267,0.0000023357638,0.000010975279,0.0004395217],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990385,0.000021233956,0.0003114757,0.000102187696,0.00027651497,0.00025009236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994935,0.000028159755,0.00024865833,0.00009268561,0.00012197489,0.000015067193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002970212,0.00010211671,0.0001268083,0.000160527,0.00033947747,0.00014314578,0.000120406934,0.000024021097,0.00005608985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021520358,0.000080044316,0.00004555921,0.00035034848,0.00004396488,0.00057574006,0.000037097143,0.00022599852,0.000003724978],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010131998,0.0002620763,0.38779727,0.00025407967,0.00018469717,0.00017070382,0.00024109974,0.010954491,0.002574981,0.27846155,0.29448572,0.024512043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004972453,0.0000015298319,0.23813851,0.00010518783,0.000024647741,0.00009787866,0.0005294761,0.0011234796,0.0000402902,0.0023427275,0.7569516,0.00014748321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21792823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8245873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60665905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030658935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004874949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78727967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610650896","doi":"","title":"Surety in the 21st Century: Everything Old Is New Again","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Surety; Underwriting; Bond; Indemnity; Payment; Business; Law; Actuarial science; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.043744226987526266,"score_gpt":0.26174512969192393,"score_spread":0.21800090270439765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610650896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4898973,0.0025235629,0.0019670087,0.06208384,0.010683716,0.0005553786,0.000027593707,0.00012913778,0.43213245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97610164,0.0011776555,0.00009557624,0.01631134,0.0054141646,0.000001559596,0.0000068009927,0.000021195863,0.00087008293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852043,0.00002262103,0.0003378636,0.00018732404,0.00060395274,0.0003278318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988803,0.000081559374,0.0004612577,0.0003621964,0.00018913443,0.000025520405],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012056568,0.00016590714,0.0001731199,0.00012713627,0.00078688085,0.0025124857,0.0009582206,0.00007601734,0.0002848271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004509963,0.00011984974,0.00013889556,0.00007718469,0.00011565116,0.0013297063,0.00006568189,0.0004841195,0.00019172051],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017047489,0.00023997542,0.08175096,0.00007821315,0.00015734503,0.00065448903,0.003773532,0.00010490492,0.00012008716,0.49461475,0.39984983,0.018485434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011876547,0.0000105583795,0.04961467,0.00014034663,0.00005120843,0.00014596299,0.0011985512,0.0008091663,0.0000060432444,0.04383794,0.9027108,0.00028712637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008613153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025769425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50286096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051791932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058420228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W261832368","doi":"","title":"Insurance Industry Woes in the Aftermath of Hurricanes Katrina & Rita","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Disaster Management and Resilience","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Storm; History; Tragedy (event); Hurricane katrina; Storm surge; Luck; Quarter (Canadian coin); Natural disaster; Law; Political science; Archaeology; Geography; Meteorology; Sociology","score_opus":0.011180030427741893,"score_gpt":0.2740141526062536,"score_spread":0.2628341221785117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W261832368","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.943429,0.00066348043,0.000018261684,0.0011106909,0.00019132956,0.00009008699,0.0000027872516,0.000008978552,0.054485407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99809784,0.000306549,0.00003655912,0.00019225564,0.0002750742,0.0000031585034,3.7207417e-7,0.000004005,0.0010841959],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985279,0.0002479781,0.0002663958,0.00009599683,0.0005963865,0.0002653642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949086,0.00010337446,0.0001683619,0.000120794204,0.0000781242,0.00003847413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011103115,0.00007874507,0.00011929249,0.00010435571,0.00027633982,0.00015187194,0.0004906703,0.000081310754,0.00005297618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043143373,0.00005324379,0.000060900584,0.00043436576,0.00030953,0.00025588338,0.000015933638,0.00035640365,0.000009234537],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068415204,0.00041176405,0.88497436,0.000034078013,0.00002013056,0.0003807202,0.04365625,0.00022290785,0.00020354716,0.03207414,0.02985446,0.008099256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047739054,0.000041422725,0.85406303,0.000098618235,0.0000136452745,0.000056724533,0.028038286,0.000009283242,0.0000107915985,0.008858986,0.10816134,0.00017049097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059040345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010087106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078306876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027295406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008179931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21712188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2757274567","doi":"","title":"Did You Really Send It? Email Evidence in Litigation and Arbitration in Argentina","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Popularity; Arbitration; Law; Civil procedure; Order (exchange); Liability; Economic Justice; Business; Internet privacy; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.05439256140919605,"score_gpt":0.287463436352665,"score_spread":0.23307087494346898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2757274567","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9683455,0.00025229363,0.00029616823,0.005102399,0.0004205613,0.00012274359,9.207357e-7,0.00001884115,0.02544055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99697626,0.001165201,0.00005221623,0.0010540952,0.00050543476,0.0000073229708,0.0000045721767,0.000010917283,0.00022401278],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989328,0.000022437518,0.0003466795,0.00018691516,0.00027869293,0.00023251756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991996,0.000032583284,0.00039175418,0.00018931572,0.00016123222,0.000025477331],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000775609,0.00011632072,0.00013887769,0.00027465317,0.00053300336,0.0013525364,0.00015620398,0.000067940884,0.000076259166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032468193,0.000114603565,0.000040241866,0.00014199127,0.000053433843,0.0027191818,0.000037917478,0.00029166523,0.00004831873],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008019767,0.0012486399,0.7332565,0.00063712616,0.00010716272,0.0010940543,0.003163155,0.0012697878,0.0075928196,0.15290283,0.045087274,0.05283869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019028803,0.000024833224,0.84541106,0.0009688612,0.000048314796,0.00018537825,0.0013350637,0.015224646,0.000014978,0.009920276,0.12458129,0.00038239453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004479829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004374603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14298254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060899925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004280323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W283144324","doi":"","title":"When Children Refuse Medical Treatment: Role of Government and Assessments; a Standardized Test to Assess a Child's Maturity and Understanding Would Help Judges in Their Solomonic Roles to Render More Uniform Decisions","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Test (biology); Maturity (psychological); Jurisdiction; Psychology; Informed consent; Consistency (knowledge bases); Guardian; Law; Family medicine; Political science; Medicine; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.07059676368038773,"score_gpt":0.3535994504383672,"score_spread":0.28300268675797946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W283144324","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97624546,0.0068831574,0.0006256507,0.014305133,0.00006421923,0.00047496444,0.00028083654,0.000018130904,0.0011024311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805534,0.016238695,0.0016292837,0.0012920455,0.00016795335,0.000014170661,0.000007751868,0.000031607673,0.000065129054],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99716717,0.00012387168,0.00060212397,0.00034592257,0.0013319282,0.00042898554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979271,0.00063407933,0.00016922223,0.00028731205,0.00012483013,0.000857438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012767761,0.00025862738,0.000564554,0.00021092033,0.00025878535,0.000102686136,0.00013507732,0.00037863303,0.00014966997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000833496,0.00019277292,0.00008631333,0.0002455047,0.000100597725,0.000116727606,0.0000898605,0.0011944493,0.0000016768684],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002493721,0.002583443,0.8222493,0.00021392763,0.0009952872,0.001282645,0.078078136,0.000036205583,0.00045717563,0.0035254178,0.0060650147,0.082019724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.056433115,0.021416632,0.6477063,0.01125243,0.0019959533,0.022836292,0.13148032,0.006339311,0.0017821374,0.030534213,0.06490135,0.0033219776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000105549516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005665118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17454304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007660776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021551401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78610516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W292880592","doi":"","title":"Antipodean Alignment: Impact of the Proposed Australian Consumer Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Consumer protection; Corporation; Commission; Law; Population; Competition (biology); Legislation; Common law; Legislature; Economics; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02131163582588744,"score_gpt":0.3287517080437196,"score_spread":0.30744007221783215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W292880592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97103494,0.000024152232,0.000024020277,0.002612249,0.00034422433,0.0001923724,0.000031238345,0.000015630301,0.025721185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99836075,0.000063402214,0.00014503644,0.00013571476,0.00024387875,0.0000015723577,7.526741e-7,0.000008150756,0.0010407296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988765,0.00010847637,0.00022640763,0.000094403826,0.00042834904,0.00026584597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913824,0.000051919113,0.00021109279,0.00022619007,0.00020261946,0.00016992404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007524881,0.00008331554,0.000109820256,0.000021793088,0.00091240904,0.00014367877,0.0003954469,0.000078849785,0.00045268558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004884117,0.000051236304,0.00020438338,0.00016581714,0.00058863376,0.00013436894,0.000018715798,0.00042679557,0.000031068368],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004779306,0.00028899903,0.034525234,0.000008714951,0.00017554028,0.000013094458,0.016396102,0.000038752958,0.06824785,0.8589218,0.019586984,0.0017491339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065013516,0.000054280554,0.022455407,0.000029142646,0.00007436828,0.00012729484,0.0010875121,0.00002022126,0.0025421185,0.017522525,0.9552065,0.0002304622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002347688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026500444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93561953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044083205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7017605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952393837","doi":"","title":"Moving beyond Uberrima Fides? the General Duty of Honesty in Contractual Performance and Punitive Damage Awards in Anglo-Canadian Contract Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Fides; Law; Honesty; Duty; Unjust enrichment; Tort; Business; Political science; Liability; Philosophy; Restitution; Theology","score_opus":0.016780272255379574,"score_gpt":0.2867413488882816,"score_spread":0.26996107663290203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952393837","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9710951,0.00014659115,0.000022600252,0.0016908923,0.00010946358,0.00017898993,0.000034252647,0.0000053451154,0.026716799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981026,0.0003819911,0.000086460466,0.0009855721,0.0003360633,0.0000065428817,0.0000019292302,0.000008026887,0.00009081836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869895,0.00019176825,0.0003071025,0.00013177344,0.00027556915,0.00039485501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999068,0.00021522096,0.00015428965,0.00011832205,0.00024567146,0.00019846074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017498144,0.00009995739,0.00017595041,0.00010050433,0.0007712975,0.00015697409,0.0002278624,0.00008899173,0.00008801712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012231672,0.00007824804,0.00003861517,0.00025908678,0.0007329225,0.00039062733,0.000017698902,0.0004120462,0.000006504726],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025748022,0.00027012965,0.32667908,0.000023903916,0.00008819912,0.00023105288,0.17581658,0.00019782368,0.0014871,0.4738492,0.0019381345,0.019161308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014135449,0.0001184769,0.8724439,0.00009211771,0.000027078666,0.00011202728,0.008000968,0.0029517745,0.00014557569,0.0045811706,0.109809734,0.00030363208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11511445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6553005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5457648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016532073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060126104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89077806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W30121777","doi":"10.1007/s00261-018-1731-9","title":"Recent Developments under the Montreal Convention","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Liability; Law; Damages; Aviation; Political science; Business; Engineering","score_opus":0.02068525859264109,"score_gpt":0.2947030903993148,"score_spread":0.2740178318066737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W30121777","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8654443,0.000103679566,0.0011436801,0.009680483,0.0042439993,0.0001231215,0.0000034336988,0.000030537485,0.11922678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99289006,0.0011149938,0.00015676644,0.00091482437,0.0008019833,0.0000031498835,0.000004897742,0.0000058268547,0.0041075074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989356,0.00011227067,0.00016403555,0.00007247755,0.00054271834,0.00017292549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924636,0.000076645185,0.00012685184,0.000056257617,0.0004183873,0.00007551452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011970054,0.000054669912,0.00004834312,0.000033738666,0.0010074963,0.00021065441,0.0001801547,0.000060465092,0.0007100124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008540119,0.000038486807,0.00004713837,0.000083056475,0.00009350288,0.0001750858,0.000007315818,0.00030909633,0.00012244658],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059174745,0.00010380813,0.003694798,0.0000012050522,0.000080564525,0.000020916077,0.009596103,0.000024486411,0.00084245263,0.8904675,0.02230318,0.07280578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002644954,0.0000086524315,0.033560857,0.000007097844,0.000011048107,0.00005400002,0.0011538386,0.000025702177,0.000050497456,0.03462342,0.9301625,0.00007787805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003452508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00834789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9078593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000820724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028325466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7774138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W303070228","doi":"","title":"Global Strategies and Techniques for Defending Class Action Trials: Defending the Global Company in Multinational Litigation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Redress; Damages; Mass tort; Law; Compromise; Legislation; Plaintiff; Multinational corporation; Political science; Jurisdiction; Liability; Tort; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.05994085514934693,"score_gpt":0.34135989735633665,"score_spread":0.2814190422069897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W303070228","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91994834,0.00023285406,0.052118048,0.003835122,0.002404635,0.0007984824,0.00005615211,0.00020348206,0.02040288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964461,0.00006930575,0.0012686107,0.00045263182,0.0016591871,0.00004840522,0.0000287698,0.000012361996,0.000014678444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985126,0.000061893836,0.00055044744,0.00021217355,0.0003469685,0.00031588177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875253,0.0002468271,0.0005124615,0.0001091502,0.00034704458,0.00003197995],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022884223,0.00018666094,0.00024807264,0.00017324954,0.00077226025,0.0018872538,0.00017626163,0.00013331832,0.00005468716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005492053,0.00014559347,0.00015585012,0.0004369621,0.000113349735,0.0019331138,0.00003586103,0.00034169058,0.000008076232],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019415152,0.00011857909,0.017655924,0.000060856877,0.00006105665,0.000006356879,0.0000676726,0.00016431033,0.0011040509,0.9298377,0.0045229355,0.04620642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030201396,0.00003789503,0.1065752,0.00017024842,0.00025147805,0.0006275772,0.008334613,0.040064212,0.000042382242,0.21814941,0.6221166,0.0006101864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010939999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019333465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7116883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018423879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011487184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W307199044","doi":"","title":"IADC International Law Committee Survey of Electronic Discovery and Data Privacy Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal Rights and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Directive on Privacy and Electronic Communications; Directive; Confidentiality; Information privacy law; Law; Privacy law; Data Protection Directive; Information privacy; Personally identifiable information; Statute; European union; Business; Member state; FTC Fair Information Practice; Data Protection Act 1998; Political science; Privacy policy; European Union law; Member states; Computer science","score_opus":0.04276911238971663,"score_gpt":0.331297695531351,"score_spread":0.2885285831416344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W307199044","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9561732,0.00027462348,0.00017890982,0.0012137361,0.0013460323,0.000101487996,0.00015511585,0.000019573094,0.040537313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99724215,0.00040897922,0.00011060128,0.0003107848,0.000555597,5.5803685e-7,0.000043098265,0.000010879881,0.0013173461],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836546,0.00021585757,0.00029183755,0.00020513622,0.00060061004,0.0003210791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871755,0.00026285378,0.0002104332,0.0003555234,0.0003132671,0.00014034628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024407287,0.00010763101,0.0001782705,0.00005009943,0.0008213803,0.0006306805,0.0009839153,0.000090010006,0.00032771347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010418208,0.000077326215,0.00004165367,0.000068838184,0.00079854805,0.0013420121,0.000101617756,0.00064233475,0.000010859024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048872782,0.00006484452,0.0021724051,0.0000023472262,0.000057960697,0.000013571004,0.0032057422,3.0563172e-7,0.00013513684,0.99117386,0.0028923706,0.00023257088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006253662,0.00004806427,0.011410707,0.000019007062,0.000029491182,0.000079820325,0.00012843756,0.000043309432,0.000038698305,0.14077882,0.8466087,0.00018956294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009304219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2464457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.850395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041633386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037940816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99729294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W310650258","doi":"","title":"Intellectual Property Litigation in Australia","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisdiction; Intellectual property; Common law; Jurisprudence; Political science","score_opus":0.08291134681595079,"score_gpt":0.32407302064554006,"score_spread":0.24116167382958925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W310650258","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9839552,0.00010495424,0.000280062,0.0011441449,0.00049955945,0.00009933636,0.000001071142,0.000029447283,0.013886192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892201,0.0013543845,0.00010109785,0.00014668697,0.0005711346,0.0000028938296,0.0000012419721,0.0000063750263,0.008596101],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987584,0.00018565333,0.0002444795,0.00010822962,0.00043076326,0.00027249043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994535,0.00008257373,0.00007762818,0.000063849046,0.00018352781,0.00013891028],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008524495,0.00007417784,0.000105272185,0.00012206525,0.00063562463,0.00008471662,0.000115645955,0.00008774961,0.0009176365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025305088,0.00005662977,0.00006138535,0.0002629774,0.00019230551,0.0002842264,0.000006170941,0.00031801593,0.00013291655],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003518489,0.00041772268,0.055572227,0.000013671733,0.000058456106,0.0009311958,0.7735211,0.000113302725,0.0014688381,0.0074743936,0.12566644,0.034410775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055659894,0.000098503886,0.01671439,0.000047981343,0.00000834676,0.0004725913,0.003090055,0.000086312786,0.00007410529,0.0017040559,0.97696006,0.00018701842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015238224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014837252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8512936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016338725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027548324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W312332631","doi":"","title":"The Availability of Punitive Damages in Europe: Growing Trend or Nonexistent Concept?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":123,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Law; Recklessness; Damages; Punishment (psychology); Malice; Civil law (Civil law); Criminal law; Strict liability; Legal liability; Political science; Common law; Harm; Liability; Public law; Psychology","score_opus":0.04235538640228112,"score_gpt":0.3418535535635373,"score_spread":0.2994981671612562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W312332631","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93900436,0.0006352371,0.0006616244,0.0028582134,0.00027235143,0.00022044602,0.000019827496,0.00001969688,0.056308232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99715215,0.0009151461,0.0001428949,0.00017222948,0.00020990339,0.0000023846253,0.0000010813399,0.000006938464,0.0013973017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849766,0.00025751966,0.00040981523,0.00011426269,0.00040433402,0.0003164323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983908,0.0008014556,0.00020162815,0.0001464946,0.00033629863,0.00012334336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036875461,0.000076257274,0.00012462342,0.00004845181,0.00084785774,0.000117604395,0.00030635254,0.000045737204,0.00009539941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005280672,0.00004885827,0.00006051185,0.0005269473,0.0005318581,0.00020970455,0.000025700348,0.00032002607,0.000010297572],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011183359,0.0008892283,0.028664479,0.000029560266,0.00016882409,0.0005050295,0.22826576,0.00017690836,0.0031926634,0.6018135,0.010220702,0.12495504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000791829,0.000096656186,0.04545507,0.0000603328,0.000027775253,0.00005490271,0.048714813,0.00002949136,0.00033535913,0.0024803204,0.90175146,0.00020199742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040971473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007196362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89153075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000102173326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028320972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6521122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W316256093","doi":"","title":"Theft of Pharmaceuticals in Brazil Governed by American Law","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Law; Aviation law; Liability; Aviation; Air cargo; Corporation; Political science; International law; Engineering","score_opus":0.010815969075800718,"score_gpt":0.3285026247719364,"score_spread":0.3176866556961357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W316256093","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8681002,0.0002331966,0.0003804672,0.0021697208,0.00021548933,0.000064860156,0.00002680518,0.000012703767,0.12879652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976518,0.00026053865,0.00009215607,0.0007371779,0.00024798038,0.0000011678671,0.0000040664577,0.000005816919,0.0009993035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874824,0.00016786807,0.00025950014,0.00007787019,0.0005538083,0.00019273075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993954,0.00013906932,0.00020989215,0.00004066738,0.00015962817,0.000055396325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075481663,0.000058844522,0.00011640565,0.00003844601,0.00016727,0.000059922833,0.00014324259,0.000032554184,0.00018822934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045475677,0.000054698976,0.000058945014,0.0001465872,0.00027393093,0.00016508621,0.0000053481117,0.0001533021,0.000018162944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011306927,0.0002465063,0.020600542,0.0000036010379,0.000024013429,0.000028476152,0.0021603103,0.00007444752,0.005949614,0.9501935,0.01795973,0.002646161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010163411,0.000060783586,0.010835018,0.000036895166,0.00001994398,0.00002477191,0.0008872932,0.00012909967,0.0023148297,0.04135753,0.9431121,0.00020544698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009257346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058275657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9251523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013720848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009899087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W326731111","doi":"","title":"City of Ontario V. Quon: Electronic Privacy in the Workplace","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Business Law and Ethics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pager; Notice; Supreme court; Confidentiality; Law; Officer; Business; Privacy policy; Rulemaking; Internet privacy; Political science; Public administration; Information privacy; Telecommunications; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.050214925394226465,"score_gpt":0.22815540697601647,"score_spread":0.17794048158179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W326731111","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9670608,0.00030739835,0.0005431748,0.00082790817,0.00037233075,0.00012109449,3.2175367e-7,0.000019370766,0.030747602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969477,0.00007397744,0.000110137255,0.0020322811,0.0004829677,0.0000037717168,0.0000021506073,0.000016024667,0.00033097854],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985737,0.000031303465,0.00038836445,0.00014724144,0.0004320857,0.00042728885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990328,0.000058920985,0.00034070163,0.0002657116,0.00028986493,0.000011992659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018673704,0.00016167705,0.00021235271,0.00016610444,0.00019963857,0.00017668921,0.0005414277,0.000107796615,0.00067558634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000082409955,0.00011342121,0.00010974846,0.00046099524,0.0000865158,0.00073107233,0.000049402322,0.0009860822,0.000055304],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012302018,0.0010374843,0.68195254,0.00023209651,0.00017176369,0.00043608848,0.029585697,0.00006670907,0.0001266863,0.2629986,0.017639685,0.0045224535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016584159,0.00004517616,0.31545392,0.0002001248,0.00014710047,0.00037919177,0.00079972885,0.0001051316,0.000024563973,0.1136268,0.56710804,0.0004518405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01155175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039576687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54946834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001229958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003884448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W36457722","doi":"10.5414/alx02333e","title":"The Admissibility of Graphics and Presentations as Demonstrative Aids in Canadian Court Proceedings","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Law; Jury; Demonstrative; Computer science; Psychology; Political science; History","score_opus":0.034599470662853536,"score_gpt":0.34732308704007686,"score_spread":0.31272361637722335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W36457722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98431396,0.0015463283,0.000008603534,0.002859245,0.00016384452,0.000121573794,0.000003860693,0.000003919114,0.010978638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979374,0.001636006,0.000076245786,0.000102410246,0.00013625028,0.0000034753912,2.037528e-7,0.0000033465953,0.00010466787],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882823,0.00010829205,0.00020969273,0.000066550994,0.00034393338,0.000443314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986652,0.00031305998,0.000107873624,0.000045050052,0.00028555203,0.00058324204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032051255,0.00006252075,0.00009135505,0.00007513841,0.00092669716,0.00011541849,0.0001302127,0.000058023074,0.000026381356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010451238,0.000047086705,0.000037089732,0.00024537827,0.00048136205,0.00054388255,0.0000069702082,0.00024404645,0.000002142842],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025900907,0.000030680723,0.80180836,0.000007006232,0.000011679339,0.0000027686806,0.05284615,3.4291395e-7,0.000022291175,0.14167665,0.0029806306,0.00058751716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030709663,0.00012384426,0.6451995,0.00011048491,0.00007121562,0.00024146511,0.13223109,0.000028893686,0.00007107229,0.030387204,0.19099525,0.00023291989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12176014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38923672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26747656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008656852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008139289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88408816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W47744283","doi":"","title":"New Wave of Tainted Blood Litigation: Hepatitis C Liability Issues","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lawsuit; Medicine; Hepatitis C; Hepatitis; Plaintiff; Class action; Law; Damages; Virology; Political science; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.01603098732651171,"score_gpt":0.2726613930764651,"score_spread":0.2566304057499534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W47744283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9647543,0.0023172304,0.001772554,0.027030407,0.0002809589,0.0001820995,0.0000118859525,0.00003887455,0.0036117246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840994,0.004076902,0.0049011502,0.00064604386,0.00086483004,0.0000010652292,0.000023805253,0.000015567397,0.0053712493],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848384,0.00007969861,0.0004797721,0.00014262242,0.0006324699,0.00018158833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988121,0.00006835405,0.00013472408,0.0001937965,0.00045787173,0.0003331907],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061036396,0.000109630426,0.00027038183,0.000074131196,0.00009505379,0.000026924865,0.000054895387,0.00020094233,0.0061843707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009724848,0.000083705745,0.00014647469,0.00021118348,0.00031032757,0.000073405055,0.0000057006528,0.0004556769,0.00002558758],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012470293,0.0011874406,0.015361636,0.00048192256,0.00084977486,0.0008324441,0.012479621,0.00004526401,0.013695053,0.009183499,0.05009648,0.89453983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013164298,0.0034333253,0.27807012,0.0023038473,0.0013543342,0.013838095,0.00052148744,0.0048767733,0.014953391,0.16275868,0.5039151,0.0008106087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016752716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000192074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8937292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036746973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003700022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W74597807","doi":"","title":"Dispelling Stereotypes of Lawyers in Today's World","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Law; Psychology; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.06180371161904504,"score_gpt":0.35239541141702035,"score_spread":0.29059169979797533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W74597807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8412141,0.00040487855,0.00041598827,0.018382618,0.0010480095,0.000092615606,0.0000026843356,0.000018172488,0.13842092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99376994,0.00079145934,0.00069844583,0.00054081174,0.00025536126,0.0000010672048,8.5480144e-7,0.0000055029404,0.003936551],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894416,0.00017424156,0.0002949886,0.00007090584,0.00033843832,0.00017727676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909896,0.00027914965,0.00020017057,0.00007464354,0.00026826133,0.00007884253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010108781,0.000053039523,0.0001013306,0.00024147498,0.0003716499,0.00006800604,0.00013377517,0.00003569368,0.00074294204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003448567,0.000051405685,0.000043000342,0.0007553213,0.00016123863,0.00052138383,0.000004290905,0.00044981993,0.000045251545],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002230978,0.0007472111,0.2082274,0.000022469103,0.000088921995,0.00021084343,0.38544327,0.00058137876,0.00043507598,0.29700655,0.09975576,0.007258018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034897076,0.00001911365,0.012010733,0.000045923483,0.000010269275,0.00007699607,0.009515214,0.000028465633,0.000048937116,0.0039213276,0.97384316,0.00013086644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001081985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004522363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87408745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000079078236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008462734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81346947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}