{"meta":{"query_hash":"4518145a9e5a","filters":{"venue":"Defense Counsel Journal"},"cohort_total":28,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":28,"exported":28,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/4518145a9e5a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Defense+Counsel+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W1483029253","doi":"","title":"Why the Development of Mass Torts in Canada Is Important to Corporate America: Not Only Are American Manufacturers Liable to Suit in Canada, but That Nation's Class Action Regime Is Developing the Potential for Increased Exposure","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Class action; Punitive damages; Law; Jury; Supreme court; Product liability; Political science; Business; Liability; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.033356526601454266,"score_gpt":0.25253559787557256,"score_spread":0.2191790712741183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1483029253","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054602623,0.011840946,0.0031362914,0.6226706,0.0021395055,0.00007720697,0.00038768788,0.00020998069,0.30493516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7599864,0.010528733,0.0026738623,0.15315586,0.00081105024,0.000033807653,0.0002534832,0.00018829868,0.07236852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918001,0.0005629383,0.0001179166,0.0006553881,0.003876965,0.002986749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9822389,0.0017918996,0.0010373316,0.000442272,0.009677411,0.00481222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037148567,0.0004003751,0.00039272386,0.0015823104,0.025108492,0.013922737,0.0019226768,0.0060955565,0.013965589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018623844,0.00047531346,0.0006267118,0.0021550981,0.016322548,0.00575188,0.0025595704,0.007934863,0.00138674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008067056,0.00007310336,0.03733744,0.00021634107,0.00006863287,0.001280986,0.007742062,0.0005650995,0.0011312923,0.52873325,0.36253724,0.06023396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005814828,0.000051846444,0.076920725,0.00093244296,0.00013235514,0.0010767219,0.020864088,0.0012406794,0.0015782941,0.05601448,0.8408836,0.00024660648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.988035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99457896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10416142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10416142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16910361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75574756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510858968","doi":"","title":"Pension Plans and Class Actions: The Vivendi Case","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Class action; Pension; Commission; Business; Judgement; Political science; Public administration; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.02570893351656532,"score_gpt":0.22064077908757246,"score_spread":0.19493184557100712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1510858968","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10426236,0.006395502,0.0011544913,0.10164385,0.0007959425,0.00015322358,0.00031801575,0.00004648116,0.78523016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8681031,0.0028931124,0.0004865881,0.046294454,0.00077029347,0.00016760144,0.00021146153,0.000029703613,0.081043795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99383837,0.0007243906,0.00011209779,0.000414119,0.001235407,0.003675568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99696845,0.0010103749,0.00025048963,0.0002590221,0.00033958312,0.0011720832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067395577,0.00041661048,0.00045876682,0.0014038006,0.016443525,0.007132959,0.0027769182,0.011948239,0.00850574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007906132,0.0005821219,0.00070375943,0.001114898,0.008723841,0.0031165532,0.006701095,0.01569326,0.0008847324],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063940715,0.0001038597,0.0064311167,0.000025256302,0.000016205891,0.0019193727,0.004974224,0.00028492682,0.00010365773,0.9176153,0.057886153,0.010576048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027749434,0.000099810924,0.016643034,0.0008046057,0.00010284216,0.0019027789,0.013284127,0.0017830423,0.0006642848,0.11827873,0.84599864,0.0001606342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3759324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49153113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3759324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018151522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020753045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74748844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1527306418","doi":"","title":"The Test for Causation in Canada: But for, but ... Maybe Not","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Supreme court; Appeal; Law; Test (biology); Confusion; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.04677605707819044,"score_gpt":0.2875057320167952,"score_spread":0.24072967493860475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1527306418","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010072459,0.06364044,0.0052534114,0.70965993,0.0065554953,0.00012656678,0.0017703113,0.00012562351,0.20279582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57428837,0.054381724,0.012906523,0.23822215,0.003593256,0.00015368825,0.0012838065,0.00023435106,0.11493618],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9852228,0.0020742735,0.00047100813,0.0014748485,0.007957148,0.0027998649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9809215,0.0058517377,0.0008552807,0.00047111174,0.010460507,0.0014398802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009407118,0.0005975466,0.00083319424,0.0023079487,0.017399902,0.009630291,0.0030224249,0.0060504777,0.0072979922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031159718,0.0006011635,0.00074051373,0.003232065,0.02511686,0.0036942777,0.0022795158,0.008211791,0.00073029596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028797433,0.000011161638,0.00375514,0.00036874533,0.000037671,0.0003744233,0.004176992,0.00024400998,0.0001815621,0.6941153,0.2652088,0.031497404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058031794,0.000024756664,0.016609816,0.0014165123,0.00012363232,0.00016960515,0.0056771296,0.00079329323,0.0005584054,0.13093857,0.84341615,0.00021403328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99474686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99608827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16996503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16996503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3224787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9627229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1566894743","doi":"","title":"The Evolving Landscape for Pharmaceutical Product Liability Litigation in Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Mass tort; Product liability; Class action; Law; Liability; Business; Tort; Product (mathematics); Law and economics; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.04030235086632047,"score_gpt":0.3866159461024432,"score_spread":0.34631359523612276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1566894743","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037384793,0.064330004,0.006231231,0.5663255,0.001928065,0.00024978834,0.00078548474,0.00030554764,0.32245955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6825338,0.0960016,0.016757708,0.13432463,0.0023605826,0.00013762311,0.0007523872,0.00023307379,0.066898614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98447126,0.0011811923,0.0005429017,0.0012514922,0.0085020065,0.004051122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97963506,0.0040920335,0.0017704495,0.00034267353,0.008313312,0.0058465023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056100925,0.00045131083,0.0006108339,0.0066768113,0.01772181,0.015393726,0.0036265685,0.0066703274,0.015578689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01672105,0.00077829405,0.0009997683,0.006820824,0.013391269,0.0038565393,0.0042241137,0.008214944,0.00087734207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054641496,0.00009120827,0.00920381,0.00044365495,0.00004059643,0.0024184594,0.0030585388,0.0018742327,0.00091749645,0.6749462,0.18201713,0.12493395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059801772,0.0000701463,0.037570737,0.0016172971,0.00007317939,0.0016554141,0.004984318,0.003954157,0.0006231898,0.06970601,0.87939906,0.00028666086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9833356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99208343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.26416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.33224672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8534701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W168443748","doi":"","title":"Defending against Suits Brought by Illegal Aliens","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Wrongful death; Law; Plaintiff; Tort; Misrepresentation; Jury; Doctrine; Lawsuit; Immigration; Political science; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.014371805943596144,"score_gpt":0.2864605411120291,"score_spread":0.27208873516843296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W168443748","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22366512,0.0054485663,0.0062476997,0.065235436,0.0013673098,0.00029979693,0.00012317917,0.0003056927,0.69730717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.895235,0.003676925,0.0018743849,0.021273494,0.00089619326,0.00010291283,0.000060885275,0.00002959562,0.07685055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995501,0.00070408935,0.0002658857,0.0005016198,0.0011797436,0.0018477708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959265,0.0022791666,0.00058258005,0.00025624977,0.0005839924,0.0003715418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031217707,0.00065915904,0.00037395032,0.0016605668,0.009698981,0.0069454033,0.002773597,0.014418523,0.0074311085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009254293,0.00033484603,0.00079837535,0.0007338183,0.006848064,0.0018398154,0.0053879195,0.004717187,0.0012922758],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000116617426,0.00025782618,0.020323236,0.0002691792,0.000099296776,0.02882724,0.030168692,0.003362532,0.0049752495,0.75200737,0.09621595,0.06337683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006945403,0.00046232683,0.021462083,0.002644871,0.0002918182,0.008645413,0.05025551,0.005629478,0.006887697,0.096138924,0.8072962,0.00021613327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031851597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04163978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031851597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00529732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00592112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06333238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W174261786","doi":"","title":"Environmental Prosecutions: Criminal Liability without Mens Rea and Exposure under the Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mens rea; Law; Statute; Indictment; Liability; Doctrine; Officer; Business; Corporate liability; Plaintiff; Corporate title; Damages; Legal liability; Political science; Criminal law; Finance","score_opus":0.0462503031042415,"score_gpt":0.2606485412822747,"score_spread":0.21439823817803322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W174261786","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.087001696,0.010400617,0.06222539,0.1349446,0.0021981986,0.00032789283,0.00026449317,0.000117481235,0.7025196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91220677,0.0045584394,0.01087847,0.028176606,0.0040937294,0.0005110548,0.000101846716,0.00005818168,0.03941501],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899899,0.0027636231,0.0006918671,0.0017820435,0.0028345317,0.0019381276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99139726,0.0053516785,0.000770304,0.0009766669,0.0010761776,0.0004279159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006660446,0.00062118616,0.0010507005,0.0011701031,0.0054914905,0.007821212,0.0020400633,0.020530056,0.005738593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017805215,0.00056528643,0.001163377,0.00063913903,0.027743291,0.013816751,0.006862042,0.016230723,0.0013207197],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000087105755,0.000011772905,0.00029658127,0.00001730457,0.000003957666,0.00041460214,0.0005811333,0.00013872658,0.000080090496,0.9939546,0.001948907,0.00254372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003374581,0.000040184972,0.0008859397,0.00014982189,0.0000174422,0.0008167238,0.0006926948,0.0010341586,0.0003114583,0.9707239,0.025256747,0.000037208003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007268563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052375696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020530056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025068256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005347974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0352242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109525249","doi":"10.12690/0895-0016-81.1.fmiii","title":"<i>President's Page:</i>IADC Pride: The Global Connection","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Connection (principal bundle); Pride; Law; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.012891224129881279,"score_gpt":0.2075620390018075,"score_spread":0.19467081487192622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109525249","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012028922,0.005907355,0.00039881605,0.3314,0.24516967,0.00021521364,0.0010749104,0.0010995211,0.41353157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007984441,0.004818364,0.00032995097,0.12067869,0.052196015,0.00012592209,0.0006630924,0.0008139292,0.81238955],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990644,0.000109038614,0.00004534266,0.00015627597,0.0003828968,0.00024205119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970607,0.00026620144,0.00012077165,0.000104860796,0.0010323769,0.001415081],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001019261,0.00090100494,0.00053052016,0.0006385874,0.0066034836,0.009954495,0.0010866657,0.0069027436,0.15186687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004100496,0.00042030867,0.00038548786,0.00093583507,0.0009752366,0.004064239,0.002807577,0.009516335,0.08697057],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001667935,0.0000033675387,0.000037395657,0.0000087338385,2.1724915e-7,0.000020207062,0.00003314057,0.0000016569828,0.00001744764,0.00019335898,0.9981844,0.0014984184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001515702,0.0000041657067,0.00028210628,0.000036645724,6.535156e-7,0.000044750646,0.00025426166,0.0000056569015,0.000023279385,0.00005385505,0.99928856,0.0000045659895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011453422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038555063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15186687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002333308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032078964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5080453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W212664854","doi":"","title":"International Class Actions in the Canadian Context: Standing, Funding, Enforceability and Trial","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Context (archaeology); Jurisdiction; Liability; Law; Class (philosophy); Settlement (finance); Action (physics); Political science; Res judicata; Business; Multinational corporation; Law and economics; Sociology; Finance","score_opus":0.05975093314548166,"score_gpt":0.29075638991564995,"score_spread":0.2310054567701683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W212664854","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04932376,0.013555406,0.0030231422,0.30580664,0.0017148185,0.00025836896,0.00056767795,0.0001464407,0.62560374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72625977,0.011744533,0.0037881494,0.07243336,0.00076281506,0.00017015723,0.00032204317,0.00011668943,0.18440253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98354244,0.0011717457,0.0003488831,0.0013492454,0.0057285978,0.007859084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98528177,0.0037668713,0.0009959242,0.0004681884,0.004143298,0.0053439685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072191525,0.00050718774,0.0004978931,0.002276922,0.029891126,0.024519889,0.0043240804,0.012472503,0.020851742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02508426,0.00058576517,0.00057079754,0.0029618558,0.0149324825,0.0051093935,0.0049631563,0.00959912,0.0011400844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046906887,0.00005337918,0.0056533534,0.00017881091,0.000017351163,0.0007374059,0.006801715,0.00063370966,0.0003743406,0.7681642,0.17166986,0.045668915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035425317,0.000058481663,0.016591398,0.0010294933,0.00007627934,0.00039847405,0.02200735,0.0012192072,0.00072928035,0.04435845,0.9133075,0.0001886368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9853216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99310315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1671706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1671706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.37314612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9659641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W224296180","doi":"","title":"Constitution, Crime, Clergy: First Amendment Implications of Sexual Abuse Claims: Church Law and Discipline, Constitutional Limitations, Damage Caps and Statutes of Limitations Raise Perplexing Issues in These Cases","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Statute; Constitution; Statutory law; Sexual abuse; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Political science; Poison control; History; Medicine","score_opus":0.07104623176890848,"score_gpt":0.3335079804758323,"score_spread":0.26246174870692385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W224296180","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14956057,0.015530324,0.009681574,0.16184513,0.0020076858,0.00040324198,0.0004109814,0.000107095264,0.66045344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8575505,0.0066825654,0.00521896,0.042548064,0.0021849542,0.00084190065,0.00017749598,0.00006935534,0.08472622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99158466,0.0031581612,0.0006160809,0.00075011904,0.0019380604,0.0019529033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98640543,0.010494173,0.00095109554,0.00062034564,0.0009945784,0.00053438393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009482143,0.0006516078,0.00088935945,0.0024422328,0.020749928,0.013445151,0.0030536505,0.027788602,0.0059792474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017554171,0.00113774,0.0010737573,0.0019638594,0.022767482,0.008232055,0.0069785705,0.020789783,0.00066522474],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007604617,0.000064831365,0.0008933207,0.000024659834,0.000006354835,0.00087998324,0.0035845153,0.00016947332,0.0001359045,0.98507094,0.006437822,0.0027245523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009212466,0.00016861559,0.012758229,0.0015822357,0.00009972314,0.0024175895,0.021104004,0.003006712,0.0020106155,0.5755067,0.3809975,0.00025589307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08450904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11964421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08450904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011851869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0105922595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16803432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W225236535","doi":"","title":"Canadian Price-Fixing Class Actions: The Supreme Court of Canada Gives the Green Light to Indirect Purchaser Claims","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Plaintiff; Damages; Class action; Legislation; Certiorari; Political science; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.01908005545827297,"score_gpt":0.25304099785432815,"score_spread":0.2339609423960552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W225236535","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050781745,0.0047315247,0.0037430476,0.10511137,0.0028667774,0.00043405767,0.002789399,0.0003252852,0.82921684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5459915,0.004696866,0.004356599,0.1637672,0.0018013334,0.00035595708,0.0013335102,0.00028054227,0.2774165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9798305,0.00070814614,0.0005044293,0.0020306788,0.010660355,0.006265949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98752975,0.0032611112,0.00038116451,0.0008195809,0.006317291,0.0016911105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073987017,0.0010300144,0.0010802189,0.002620065,0.03140074,0.01560456,0.0059849042,0.02367019,0.01350337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022409715,0.0014860238,0.001682704,0.003179153,0.0077967457,0.0026308456,0.0045791734,0.02006514,0.0017326354],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009112727,0.00006443823,0.004820807,0.000099787416,0.000070333794,0.0015928074,0.002974455,0.00084963907,0.0010047012,0.6883255,0.2820453,0.018061018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002361513,0.00006515004,0.011021954,0.00073980395,0.00040232533,0.00036231923,0.0021660938,0.0026494055,0.002143531,0.056985274,0.92282706,0.00040087456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9799759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99054986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08482594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08482594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19327073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61545813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W227614572","doi":"","title":"Canada's New Consumer Product Legislation: A Shield or a Sword?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Product liability; Consumer protection; Product (mathematics); Law; Business; Legislation; Commission; Plaintiff; Government (linguistics); Parliament; Liability; Commerce; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.09851926336921897,"score_gpt":0.3031498479018137,"score_spread":0.20463058453259475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W227614572","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016842047,0.015181662,0.0004493755,0.82986873,0.014267565,0.000035732253,0.00055636925,0.0001916423,0.13776466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.041724175,0.015751803,0.0014864809,0.69525015,0.005151761,0.000044215965,0.0006472188,0.00021680439,0.23972742],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867784,0.000816386,0.0002867842,0.0009924545,0.008132482,0.0029934766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9829454,0.0023797927,0.0005947817,0.000843635,0.010233155,0.0030033335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059078587,0.0007467898,0.00090193,0.0017616869,0.01486469,0.01544788,0.0030071752,0.018188294,0.02820802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01783897,0.0007539615,0.0009645572,0.0031713515,0.010856807,0.0070678,0.0027199879,0.013471514,0.006141726],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001186298,0.000013955576,0.00028709482,0.00007689803,0.000006720679,0.00009989464,0.0004990192,0.000025329397,0.00009512371,0.047618523,0.93872786,0.012537749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075546263,0.0000046752148,0.00068718515,0.00011708822,0.000008648859,0.000035850266,0.0004649847,0.00003232272,0.00004789913,0.0018416785,0.9967303,0.000021992022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9521329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97788095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07399209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07399209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19373937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5368527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W252615043","doi":"","title":"Class Actions in Canada: 2005 State of the Union: Growing, Expanding, and Developing","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Plaintiff; Legislation; Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.01415921890431619,"score_gpt":0.21302251372267741,"score_spread":0.19886329481836124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W252615043","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13066503,0.073641196,0.0029056035,0.0872107,0.0024354726,0.0006276669,0.006959347,0.0005964402,0.69495857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.630061,0.05822792,0.005862891,0.02828412,0.0005992514,0.00019528122,0.0046223947,0.0002055837,0.2719416],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899906,0.00022110717,0.0002323153,0.0005165084,0.0066095856,0.0024298304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916481,0.0006392216,0.0006172118,0.00013811722,0.004608061,0.0023492426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026968587,0.00036360812,0.00035875133,0.004572579,0.014496057,0.013077141,0.0024796568,0.0032194776,0.0075568585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070030657,0.00055966264,0.00067173666,0.006443815,0.004022522,0.0015744682,0.0024868525,0.00359481,0.00077141414],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089584995,0.00015313811,0.04403226,0.0008723408,0.000058004367,0.0012897466,0.010003209,0.0014190074,0.0010976817,0.23239763,0.40737298,0.3012144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010963452,0.000021148053,0.060120337,0.0005203842,0.00003943263,0.0001641496,0.004887704,0.00044414419,0.000436752,0.0018626621,0.9314192,0.00007312709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9954066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20277396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20277396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.36126086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9246692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610650896","doi":"","title":"Surety in the 21st Century: Everything Old Is New Again","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Surety; Underwriting; Bond; Indemnity; Payment; Business; Law; Actuarial science; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.043744226987526266,"score_gpt":0.26174512969192393,"score_spread":0.21800090270439765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610650896","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0144599965,0.27974594,0.005802818,0.46032655,0.010521529,0.000019655246,0.00012209325,0.00009763847,0.2289039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46672416,0.2523928,0.0037782628,0.1530548,0.025563264,0.000078797515,0.00016844808,0.00023540528,0.09800405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931901,0.0021375308,0.00031049218,0.00096218806,0.002506292,0.00089352234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914418,0.0044118776,0.00062532956,0.0008479008,0.0014829653,0.0011901833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055075916,0.0004382154,0.00088439946,0.0023662646,0.0099595245,0.019192947,0.0016366395,0.009871299,0.0066809515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012321549,0.00035057007,0.0004907388,0.0026930163,0.048407163,0.022222599,0.0072276676,0.015065572,0.0009382353],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001630121,0.00001690402,0.00051121105,0.00013010154,0.000008469595,0.00019103874,0.009022005,0.000112575035,0.00009709046,0.9084892,0.040515423,0.04088974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042564984,0.000022556422,0.0010561321,0.0006647685,0.00000554165,0.00027799103,0.004810151,0.00008165138,0.00007455502,0.24450116,0.74846977,0.00003143993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01721218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022151912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019192947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010941306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010875426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07938516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W261832368","doi":"","title":"Insurance Industry Woes in the Aftermath of Hurricanes Katrina & Rita","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Disaster Management and Resilience","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Storm; History; Tragedy (event); Hurricane katrina; Storm surge; Luck; Quarter (Canadian coin); Natural disaster; Law; Political science; Archaeology; Geography; Meteorology; Sociology","score_opus":0.011180030427741893,"score_gpt":0.2740141526062536,"score_spread":0.2628341221785117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W261832368","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5804513,0.0101110535,0.00048304643,0.27133366,0.019750083,0.00011463105,0.0006524726,0.00024113336,0.116862655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81998193,0.0114768585,0.0007123942,0.04669138,0.005509727,0.00008771419,0.0010389338,0.00017847745,0.11432262],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909925,0.00012500725,0.00002875663,0.00005095157,0.0003487574,0.00034732817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978668,0.00012625301,0.00030653173,0.00005639565,0.000464011,0.0011799411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015135298,0.0004256867,0.0002678245,0.0010980886,0.010129541,0.0051410184,0.00051450107,0.0025806993,0.014114284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00483389,0.0003287265,0.0003843958,0.0006416126,0.0016070618,0.0017211435,0.0038896424,0.0055901743,0.003226578],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002887074,0.0004823697,0.072321296,0.00028021497,0.00010256297,0.0079641575,0.066984616,0.00021488722,0.0018555068,0.0059089707,0.72968423,0.11391255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001601746,0.00031760384,0.10407163,0.00033230046,0.000026462809,0.0014601796,0.21427706,0.00024626858,0.00032729123,0.0013185862,0.67755854,0.00004804022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023864418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06577795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023864418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024353757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003078478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04745102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2757274567","doi":"","title":"Did You Really Send It? Email Evidence in Litigation and Arbitration in Argentina","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Popularity; Arbitration; Law; Civil procedure; Order (exchange); Liability; Economic Justice; Business; Internet privacy; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.05439256140919605,"score_gpt":0.287463436352665,"score_spread":0.23307087494346898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2757274567","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5235385,0.07179152,0.0015809152,0.10462042,0.0012231416,0.00017393772,0.00040471673,0.000040014187,0.29662687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9758177,0.0075131417,0.00044437012,0.004687099,0.0005504204,0.00006118098,0.00009738391,0.000013559174,0.010815164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909952,0.0037363952,0.0005885178,0.00069137,0.0023204784,0.0016680793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98695415,0.008115528,0.0024327424,0.0003240619,0.0014630196,0.00071046624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007924611,0.0003568211,0.0007367999,0.0028898185,0.0088587105,0.006619634,0.0014531784,0.0066470704,0.01029038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02452814,0.0004059668,0.00025265242,0.003427126,0.005808865,0.0033485722,0.0046733622,0.0030326347,0.00061140937],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000654215,0.0005120473,0.083712086,0.0015743712,0.00013495803,0.020956364,0.096558236,0.000705031,0.00094424805,0.5452539,0.11119801,0.13779655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018649777,0.0002735041,0.19363873,0.0055321427,0.00021407803,0.0064828717,0.08813955,0.0035429876,0.00096545095,0.07597119,0.6248795,0.00017362181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039579242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050097056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039579242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011052108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052569485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08018899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W283144324","doi":"","title":"When Children Refuse Medical Treatment: Role of Government and Assessments; a Standardized Test to Assess a Child's Maturity and Understanding Would Help Judges in Their Solomonic Roles to Render More Uniform Decisions","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Test (biology); Maturity (psychological); Jurisdiction; Psychology; Informed consent; Consistency (knowledge bases); Guardian; Law; Family medicine; Political science; Medicine; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.07059676368038773,"score_gpt":0.3535994504383672,"score_spread":0.28300268675797946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W283144324","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21620736,0.008627254,0.017609334,0.45098928,0.0029112776,0.0014809206,0.00058650156,0.00030099502,0.30128697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.932102,0.0022701665,0.0135141425,0.036415998,0.00041133183,0.0002868194,0.00016807493,0.00005669535,0.014774819],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9785821,0.0077944724,0.0015388274,0.0009520651,0.008002483,0.0031301228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97485256,0.008810518,0.0044139624,0.0012303602,0.0067271036,0.0039654803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02366702,0.00026106535,0.00030615288,0.0014481863,0.0070021045,0.0062342244,0.0017625382,0.005780556,0.0034425654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059553534,0.00037630592,0.0004857893,0.0009412815,0.009665176,0.0033950391,0.0037086778,0.0066590426,0.0005814875],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016715769,0.0002641707,0.13190353,0.00032128068,0.00007020628,0.009121188,0.047267642,0.0010711343,0.0031833937,0.28262058,0.25719756,0.26681226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001766766,0.0005278992,0.24078014,0.0029828711,0.0001657447,0.009492626,0.09586703,0.0036921042,0.008257737,0.1206617,0.5168677,0.00052777637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17817727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45187873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17817727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011617533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0767134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3542803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W292880592","doi":"","title":"Antipodean Alignment: Impact of the Proposed Australian Consumer Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Consumer protection; Corporation; Commission; Law; Population; Competition (biology); Legislation; Common law; Legislature; Economics; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02131163582588744,"score_gpt":0.3287517080437196,"score_spread":0.30744007221783215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W292880592","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11549526,0.0019132379,0.0020780254,0.16631068,0.0019121269,0.00022839766,0.000089190115,0.000065039465,0.7119081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67270327,0.0023061112,0.0025953215,0.12323443,0.0008411942,0.00021269318,0.000093487004,0.00006652719,0.197947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9840225,0.0043095113,0.0003924582,0.001087672,0.007908935,0.0022788453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912213,0.0033596822,0.00085789297,0.0005264795,0.0026857457,0.0013489447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010001694,0.00025258234,0.00029990813,0.0012940894,0.009860689,0.010954838,0.0020917172,0.008981073,0.012004137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024278458,0.00051693607,0.0007057825,0.0014544659,0.007900097,0.0052733887,0.007803958,0.012424921,0.0013320937],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005519911,0.00028238358,0.0065156333,0.00013238094,0.000012740648,0.0010196156,0.014202626,0.00032439706,0.00052300264,0.8688067,0.05793075,0.050194453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004339985,0.0002955031,0.03454034,0.000434296,0.000044759152,0.0005223997,0.015304544,0.0025037432,0.0009855366,0.09339574,0.85183597,0.00009383554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.085925676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12874998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.085925676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0142196715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027730871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17085105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952393837","doi":"","title":"Moving beyond Uberrima Fides? the General Duty of Honesty in Contractual Performance and Punitive Damage Awards in Anglo-Canadian Contract Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Fides; Law; Honesty; Duty; Unjust enrichment; Tort; Business; Political science; Liability; Philosophy; Restitution; Theology","score_opus":0.016780272255379574,"score_gpt":0.2867413488882816,"score_spread":0.26996107663290203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952393837","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18368007,0.0065537994,0.005263048,0.2902775,0.00077377254,0.00008806124,0.000120096796,0.00003337618,0.51321024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96222687,0.0010111132,0.0008605539,0.0114494525,0.00014271656,0.000024309533,0.000012300255,0.000020738229,0.02425204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98386705,0.003997984,0.00049361726,0.0012488749,0.0045115603,0.0058808657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98220855,0.007141998,0.0012042735,0.0010423302,0.005764106,0.0026387547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016272215,0.00034379063,0.0006689213,0.0017392111,0.024987515,0.01716808,0.0025885848,0.009010851,0.00696101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038212802,0.0006649839,0.00043147005,0.0020071866,0.042557873,0.008729389,0.0049768756,0.012875299,0.00045287848],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002307462,0.000028760185,0.002734956,0.000023259543,0.000007516795,0.000080752754,0.016939625,0.00022008078,0.00009603144,0.9594496,0.008239852,0.0121565955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067819376,0.000057915182,0.041198812,0.0009219068,0.000111381756,0.00031012465,0.09520672,0.00257984,0.00056063477,0.6372628,0.22140141,0.0003206264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9456483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.971962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.067271166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.067271166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1229358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48808873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W30121777","doi":"10.1007/s00261-018-1731-9","title":"Recent Developments under the Montreal Convention","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Liability; Law; Damages; Aviation; Political science; Business; Engineering","score_opus":0.02068525859264109,"score_gpt":0.2947030903993148,"score_spread":0.2740178318066737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W30121777","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004199717,0.1414409,0.005774642,0.20184632,0.058132168,0.00022655138,0.0017740316,0.0007006694,0.585905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07471866,0.09488194,0.0112587465,0.07195992,0.030181734,0.00036858345,0.0014431281,0.00047209495,0.7147152],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954882,0.0007233815,0.00017888068,0.0007786509,0.0019905565,0.0008403545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946413,0.0006705253,0.0003941005,0.0003763845,0.002755884,0.0011617155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052818577,0.0007668396,0.0005025678,0.0018375175,0.0035866601,0.00736737,0.0022833375,0.004562147,0.059485897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009894093,0.00030165105,0.0005603109,0.0018891187,0.003815864,0.0026890875,0.0030195538,0.004298249,0.014869207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046172954,0.00004702736,0.0010938038,0.00034736225,0.000013447658,0.0002785706,0.00041714322,0.00022846514,0.0006456742,0.19815731,0.55461055,0.24411441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023205284,0.000008830663,0.0008128539,0.00011564106,0.0000025507463,0.00006235809,0.000040867013,0.000027521017,0.0000686276,0.0014968184,0.99735343,0.000008136757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20016845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20099105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20016845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012408075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02707078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39800662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W303070228","doi":"","title":"Global Strategies and Techniques for Defending Class Action Trials: Defending the Global Company in Multinational Litigation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Redress; Damages; Mass tort; Law; Compromise; Legislation; Plaintiff; Multinational corporation; Political science; Jurisdiction; Liability; Tort; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.05994085514934693,"score_gpt":0.34135989735633665,"score_spread":0.2814190422069897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W303070228","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03040642,0.01430115,0.43284258,0.09547909,0.0012789627,0.00090884854,0.00009577759,0.0006636209,0.42402348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6725685,0.007808793,0.2219114,0.026838921,0.0014711359,0.0015822144,0.00013779888,0.000578444,0.06710276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9695795,0.020447016,0.001021441,0.0029158453,0.0041875523,0.0018486473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9586219,0.02735216,0.0026277096,0.0067130174,0.003190797,0.0014943617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06106307,0.0012813018,0.0011616976,0.0059418157,0.006791987,0.022190616,0.0035029345,0.010992893,0.009642933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057730734,0.0009217906,0.0016757519,0.0037870312,0.031070966,0.0147229675,0.013965668,0.011410897,0.0025016943],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003058344,0.00002666037,0.001451843,0.00012487966,0.000035422843,0.00021544988,0.005579688,0.0012223166,0.0003955578,0.9346832,0.009243669,0.046990793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009769694,0.00016893641,0.0015856652,0.0014691476,0.00012927469,0.000594532,0.005730346,0.0049579004,0.0012394845,0.7572192,0.22671734,0.00009053042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066503426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011277127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06106307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066703153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010218661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32293624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W307199044","doi":"","title":"IADC International Law Committee Survey of Electronic Discovery and Data Privacy Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal Rights and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Directive on Privacy and Electronic Communications; Directive; Confidentiality; Information privacy law; Law; Privacy law; Data Protection Directive; Information privacy; Personally identifiable information; Statute; European union; Business; Member state; FTC Fair Information Practice; Data Protection Act 1998; Political science; Privacy policy; European Union law; Member states; Computer science","score_opus":0.04276911238971663,"score_gpt":0.331297695531351,"score_spread":0.2885285831416344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W307199044","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034573611,0.0863156,0.00860579,0.09410105,0.0029313392,0.0007338339,0.0052962517,0.00072401634,0.79783475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09387189,0.2648003,0.028237415,0.13810344,0.006259442,0.003268028,0.019979356,0.0012701348,0.44421008],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96252066,0.0045136893,0.0031359221,0.0026811124,0.023950327,0.003198386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9275346,0.0246095,0.0045718323,0.005239468,0.035033055,0.0030115177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030800821,0.0009475274,0.001159079,0.022930868,0.006461983,0.018112369,0.004196902,0.00872307,0.022120053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04929096,0.0010096466,0.0011120563,0.03078949,0.0054979706,0.009930547,0.004848112,0.008411824,0.00960863],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017892156,0.00012429369,0.002316369,0.00062363374,0.000012669313,0.00010572235,0.00070201966,0.00042793184,0.00023077488,0.27692452,0.60822,0.11029419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027737985,0.0000081503385,0.0011779064,0.0008835768,0.0000053115186,0.000063802785,0.0002617668,0.00013889132,0.00009984256,0.0056490405,0.99169487,0.000014032049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0593791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03378235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0593791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018702133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046251643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16289222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W310650258","doi":"","title":"Intellectual Property Litigation in Australia","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisdiction; Intellectual property; Common law; Jurisprudence; Political science","score_opus":0.08291134681595079,"score_gpt":0.32407302064554006,"score_spread":0.24116167382958925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W310650258","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20436028,0.052087776,0.0055312407,0.0651587,0.0011763412,0.00035281418,0.00019140347,0.00014662319,0.67099494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7924417,0.034648374,0.0034598713,0.03152809,0.0010325909,0.00023049723,0.00018890301,0.000048392543,0.13642162],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952825,0.0008857016,0.00030960565,0.00047906017,0.0022247613,0.0008184506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996221,0.0015911891,0.0006668337,0.0001694606,0.00092680915,0.00042470652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032700202,0.0002154626,0.00031611486,0.0035517463,0.0084416745,0.007860625,0.0011459106,0.0066381595,0.00828463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008407947,0.00033139362,0.0006813779,0.003694376,0.004977209,0.004457537,0.0060481383,0.0041793296,0.00085057784],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031993837,0.00017051937,0.007943633,0.00057875016,0.000036898997,0.0074495,0.028926412,0.0011976137,0.0013165441,0.7571661,0.046360504,0.14882155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019922698,0.00016383566,0.03346692,0.0011445789,0.000049744438,0.0054280558,0.007647723,0.0027732633,0.0009000441,0.08758478,0.8607539,0.000067240515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04026842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036305945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04026842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0136817675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012636647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.099268675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W312332631","doi":"","title":"The Availability of Punitive Damages in Europe: Growing Trend or Nonexistent Concept?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":123,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Law; Recklessness; Damages; Punishment (psychology); Malice; Civil law (Civil law); Criminal law; Strict liability; Legal liability; Political science; Common law; Harm; Liability; Public law; Psychology","score_opus":0.04235538640228112,"score_gpt":0.3418535535635373,"score_spread":0.2994981671612562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W312332631","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061960135,0.42047048,0.0190363,0.1462439,0.006145145,0.000038763446,0.0006262219,0.00008839148,0.3453907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7954862,0.1262394,0.00607663,0.037298184,0.012284786,0.000102408994,0.00048490774,0.00012664663,0.0219008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99477863,0.0014613443,0.0004161792,0.0014432658,0.0013813009,0.0005193748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910981,0.004319576,0.0018921191,0.0007708027,0.0012439964,0.00067538454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005717408,0.00044281708,0.00084858557,0.0042130845,0.0016306466,0.013794839,0.0024066519,0.009564579,0.005904029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012340539,0.00028848732,0.0006627698,0.0057846545,0.0140350275,0.015846016,0.003628735,0.006239364,0.00073424954],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045314184,0.00004925779,0.00402461,0.0002130622,0.000028822491,0.00027174642,0.00092541624,0.00029254679,0.00008449027,0.92324036,0.011087809,0.059736546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002148861,0.00015515431,0.030350294,0.0030855427,0.0000480471,0.0023742311,0.0028643704,0.0009096255,0.00027798608,0.35580212,0.60401577,0.0000953638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00359918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023378346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013794839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037204677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026307104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0302369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W316256093","doi":"","title":"Theft of Pharmaceuticals in Brazil Governed by American Law","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Law; Aviation law; Liability; Aviation; Air cargo; Corporation; Political science; International law; Engineering","score_opus":0.010815969075800718,"score_gpt":0.3285026247719364,"score_spread":0.3176866556961357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W316256093","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021019017,0.015495685,0.0041273185,0.08178866,0.00087458064,0.00012515979,0.00019083789,0.00012814718,0.87625057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62338495,0.01910355,0.0052454034,0.119435884,0.0018849213,0.00037992068,0.00024907943,0.00016628193,0.23015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918297,0.0014760266,0.00051887083,0.0013670386,0.0032384524,0.0015700073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933529,0.0026772697,0.0009146238,0.00075994054,0.0016409308,0.0006543694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008479921,0.00036067978,0.00044545362,0.0018034162,0.005978638,0.01032213,0.0011257597,0.007422268,0.011467407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012702133,0.0005025319,0.0007815765,0.001619214,0.009072404,0.0036265103,0.004680687,0.009499648,0.002258509],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001227795,0.00003272078,0.0013277986,0.000057310233,0.000013080559,0.00038194345,0.0013665033,0.00007222231,0.00041166754,0.9436183,0.0334838,0.019222517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002132422,0.00004129553,0.0035198429,0.00041013162,0.00004542703,0.0005855896,0.00056016265,0.0003561695,0.00061649835,0.06488342,0.92892015,0.00003991975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07141068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07421652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07141068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013189192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019375313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14199007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W326731111","doi":"","title":"City of Ontario V. Quon: Electronic Privacy in the Workplace","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Business Law and Ethics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pager; Notice; Supreme court; Confidentiality; Law; Officer; Business; Privacy policy; Rulemaking; Internet privacy; Political science; Public administration; Information privacy; Telecommunications; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.050214925394226465,"score_gpt":0.22815540697601647,"score_spread":0.17794048158179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W326731111","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041421186,0.0050849393,0.001083447,0.2005238,0.001795103,0.00015345568,0.00077438995,0.00008316287,0.7490805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47043222,0.0053799585,0.00054085045,0.13648672,0.001172176,0.00014019218,0.00032436097,0.00006883605,0.38545465],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942147,0.00047214288,0.00015820796,0.00042905382,0.0027183814,0.0020075135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99621814,0.0014377258,0.00025418118,0.00023305767,0.001224086,0.0006328739],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021863033,0.00029603246,0.0002091982,0.00061735744,0.020835841,0.0070319134,0.0012987544,0.0113933105,0.01527807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005889863,0.0005419044,0.00033158073,0.0011358589,0.006162946,0.0023247765,0.0020520838,0.0043183765,0.0014285293],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088145134,0.00004430926,0.009780121,0.00015284997,0.000012222219,0.0026278207,0.015268841,0.00018384306,0.0011097835,0.24954598,0.6979321,0.023253974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043605116,0.000030960404,0.014912068,0.00040663086,0.00003262977,0.00037173554,0.005772909,0.00022455808,0.0006267922,0.0071840603,0.9703178,0.00007625253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9415797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97889256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9415797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04697797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055929262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3408506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W36457722","doi":"10.5414/alx02333e","title":"The Admissibility of Graphics and Presentations as Demonstrative Aids in Canadian Court Proceedings","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Law; Jury; Demonstrative; Computer science; Psychology; Political science; History","score_opus":0.034599470662853536,"score_gpt":0.34732308704007686,"score_spread":0.31272361637722335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W36457722","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002038233,0.0026560067,0.005051796,0.04706605,0.09367819,0.0004343267,0.002164399,0.0016653097,0.8452457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.030189458,0.0021068584,0.003526642,0.0053711752,0.008573815,0.00015431718,0.0006842382,0.0010624238,0.9483311],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99223775,0.0011512458,0.00039037073,0.00066987565,0.0045525986,0.0009982337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980576,0.0040200828,0.0007205092,0.002234148,0.008282427,0.0041669025],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005179521,0.000935261,0.0006518846,0.0028276343,0.007100448,0.011889354,0.003236686,0.0047526797,0.44385436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03679266,0.0006405056,0.0007220807,0.0022230654,0.0036154634,0.0033378063,0.00524079,0.0041113878,0.108918086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004395317,0.00001426896,0.00017480786,0.000091027665,0.0000043503596,0.0002754316,0.0003291912,0.00008972246,0.00030312565,0.030646259,0.9329786,0.03504927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038838875,0.0000054648617,0.00013449523,0.000051886607,0.0000018800679,0.00008517429,0.00015814844,0.00007517989,0.000078471094,0.0008647026,0.998533,0.0000075770713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16059113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25353494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8394089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013517428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02355602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7932743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W47744283","doi":"","title":"New Wave of Tainted Blood Litigation: Hepatitis C Liability Issues","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lawsuit; Medicine; Hepatitis C; Hepatitis; Plaintiff; Class action; Law; Damages; Virology; Political science; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.01603098732651171,"score_gpt":0.2726613930764651,"score_spread":0.2566304057499534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W47744283","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011644394,0.01811067,0.002013736,0.8342193,0.0049879556,0.000041662275,0.00008604276,0.0001323979,0.12876393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21614717,0.021330804,0.0026776337,0.6862517,0.020174077,0.00006534153,0.00018115617,0.000121235134,0.053050876],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9826173,0.0025063008,0.00094664417,0.0019166446,0.009428986,0.0025840844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9412866,0.035975154,0.0029562481,0.0022820784,0.009787626,0.007712265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018907366,0.00041340318,0.0006261181,0.002836279,0.011677221,0.015357011,0.00336485,0.034822103,0.017779749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03980151,0.0006226971,0.0012492357,0.0019771634,0.009610047,0.010153941,0.0037728085,0.021439128,0.0021296812],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042867072,0.00020769541,0.006141948,0.00018032812,0.00004205026,0.0042387545,0.0020093175,0.0002465066,0.0004692229,0.2543306,0.6341873,0.097903445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000092104354,0.00018867936,0.013506302,0.0013222463,0.00009715096,0.011066504,0.0041419775,0.0015480067,0.00091880857,0.08954433,0.87735283,0.00022113594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037221685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06472834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037221685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011046585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01685459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09999293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W74597807","doi":"","title":"Dispelling Stereotypes of Lawyers in Today's World","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Law; Psychology; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.06180371161904504,"score_gpt":0.35239541141702035,"score_spread":0.29059169979797533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W74597807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9279787,0.0005264543,0.0016396361,0.013200044,0.00036797678,0.0000638047,0.000083998326,0.000027352962,0.056112066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98826665,0.00037698768,0.00064577244,0.004878767,0.00012820942,0.000068972055,0.000056590205,0.00004899286,0.005529142],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867148,0.008552608,0.00031233983,0.0008756496,0.0024312877,0.0011133777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.969971,0.01733309,0.0050390842,0.0021369744,0.0032884884,0.0022312393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015221708,0.00044183087,0.00047201503,0.0027858538,0.013315785,0.009699193,0.0015257653,0.0026762725,0.0068642464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03234622,0.0006793031,0.00038024233,0.0013552422,0.016376205,0.010451376,0.009342654,0.0078553315,0.00092949433],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030769723,0.00006443958,0.006603992,0.000032237724,0.0000047537674,0.0002483127,0.97776115,0.000010091423,0.00044608416,0.006141809,0.0030394227,0.005616887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010559503,0.000030409497,0.0052537895,0.00011105271,0.0000055536516,0.00013094832,0.9688843,0.00007806384,0.00025176254,0.0023212794,0.022906322,0.000016042737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02205019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046745617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02205019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064614047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033110804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08050108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}