{"meta":{"query_hash":"4958ea535888","filters":{"venue":"Deleuze Studies"},"cohort_total":16,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":16,"exported":16,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/4958ea535888","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Deleuze+Studies"},"results":[{"id":"W1567145022","doi":"10.3366/e1750224109000579","title":"Lessons to Live (2): Deleuze","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deleuze Studies","topic":"Spatial and Cultural Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"The Imaginary; Nothing; Work (physics); Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.11731642447530757,"score_gpt":0.4210111814404927,"score_spread":0.3036947569651851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1567145022","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5747141,0.017072374,0.00009244536,0.21051669,0.0014081025,0.00088351796,0.000019251165,0.00065830356,0.19463517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875624,0.0028091753,0.0004217606,0.0030788954,0.0006322835,0.000035704823,0.000001080128,0.0000055255346,0.0054531563],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986706,0.00006818517,0.00017421985,0.0002708037,0.00034742532,0.00046878288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930495,0.00009657952,0.00004640432,0.00011283832,0.00030473233,0.00013452397],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023166655,0.00015918248,0.00028292972,0.000038577793,0.0014302287,0.000052220887,0.0002216551,0.000049099126,0.00006458248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056579063,0.000119854456,0.00008873819,0.0003613455,0.00019742435,0.00012543148,0.000083080165,0.000084952626,0.00043021806],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000528187,0.00013694754,0.0022007641,0.00001085431,0.00034542647,0.000030425326,0.3436824,0.000028197306,0.00028099207,0.12906928,0.17618924,0.34797266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002677331,0.00032779697,0.030637808,0.00006141175,0.0000670789,0.0000011480112,0.19062153,0.0000024475605,0.00017508681,0.018620767,0.7586907,0.0005264917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016205246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014891936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5825015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012155006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033832635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1803385623","doi":"10.3366/dls.2015.0192","title":"Saints, Jesters and Nomads: The Anomalous Pedagogies of Lacan, Žižek, … Deleuze and Guattari","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deleuze Studies","topic":"Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Deleuze and Guattari; Context (archaeology); The Imaginary; Capitalism; Sociology; SAINT; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; History; Art history; Psychology; Politics; Law; Archaeology; Political science","score_opus":0.23207028143068478,"score_gpt":0.42856353652739787,"score_spread":0.1964932550967131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1803385623","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9320523,0.039299853,0.00002352698,0.0035514224,0.00061474316,0.00019959889,0.00004879977,0.00004483761,0.0241649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99608475,0.0010886712,0.0001619299,0.0009818776,0.0002946601,0.00002970509,0.00000469196,0.000022976403,0.001330738],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848396,0.00017620585,0.00039311853,0.00035787778,0.00021085888,0.0003779949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986166,0.00039974114,0.000167973,0.00048322766,0.0002244037,0.000108052685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041688638,0.00025771483,0.0005081225,0.00012187453,0.00015834616,0.000028401886,0.00021503681,0.00008904749,0.000014551458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018956866,0.00017907089,0.00007684443,0.00017647994,0.00088220206,0.00007743927,0.00017297151,0.00015741616,0.00002480438],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006059652,0.0004255874,0.5475603,0.00033805962,0.0077679884,0.00011233587,0.16252062,0.000026714153,0.00006566127,0.14467923,0.11339309,0.022504443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006708034,0.0019900275,0.38154045,0.0001723648,0.002467081,0.00038733074,0.24905436,0.00012099875,0.00009903275,0.10158519,0.2540791,0.0017960465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005139771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004392203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16601984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035511704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035555742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7302299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1920210730","doi":"10.3366/dls.2015.0204","title":"The Take and the Stutter: Glenn Gould's Time Synthesis","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deleuze Studies","topic":"Music History and Culture","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Musical; Active listening; Piano; Deleuze and Guattari; Aesthetics; Temporality; Modernism (music); Studio; Art; Art history; Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Literature; Visual arts; Communication","score_opus":0.07544858652774035,"score_gpt":0.2327971712024257,"score_spread":0.15734858467468538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1920210730","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12988643,0.0782916,0.0000015177817,0.01950333,0.002230764,0.0006166976,0.00005350576,0.00019922994,0.7692169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86544245,0.00060528656,0.000007655504,0.002029769,0.0013691153,0.00015329698,0.0000016257768,0.000017276365,0.13037352],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993221,0.00010811501,0.00013434514,0.00012536482,0.0001517377,0.00015834303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924695,0.00034949882,0.000055263277,0.00018292009,0.0001311883,0.0000341676],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045003797,0.00012103685,0.00018930365,0.000010077866,0.001552379,0.00012473414,0.00014807878,0.000019406189,0.00019771543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022099313,0.000049779974,0.00005370494,0.000016097601,0.0013739736,0.000076197386,0.000079724625,0.00009422793,0.00019152787],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059223552,0.00001033972,0.000013596009,0.000009399327,0.00022974117,0.0000028596457,0.15218349,7.512399e-7,0.0000018432944,0.17417215,0.6683947,0.004921919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002523785,0.000018634963,0.00001890368,0.000012577228,0.00007026725,0.000002548382,0.043063354,0.00001720233,0.0000035752448,0.0035520976,0.95290536,0.000083111496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000413383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012445102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.735556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021348073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013284656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972517648","doi":"10.3366/dls.2010.0103","title":"Critical Forces: True Critique or Mere Criticism of Deleuze contra Hegel?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deleuze Studies","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Philosophy; Criticism; Relation (database); Epistemology; Principal (computer security); Literature; Art","score_opus":0.10150933364786226,"score_gpt":0.3606250894425724,"score_spread":0.25911575579471013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972517648","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37383226,0.013500062,0.00046576528,0.047544193,0.021294486,0.0013955289,0.001943508,0.00089824194,0.539126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916684,0.00045693654,0.0003858488,0.0023991517,0.0024954733,0.00007655539,0.000012855789,0.00004960999,0.0024551854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783653,0.000096870186,0.0006953509,0.00040945687,0.00039578977,0.00056599855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969885,0.0011144438,0.000102128615,0.0004210599,0.0012391884,0.00013468115],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041774032,0.00035367627,0.0007763985,0.00012600147,0.0007123864,0.00014391926,0.00034248672,0.00017407822,0.00081308995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001960778,0.0002694869,0.00025965055,0.000049076585,0.0029518935,0.00041918174,0.0001337562,0.00063045585,0.00005348121],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096359494,0.00014101953,0.000018992298,0.00053087174,0.0002593423,0.000047563983,0.030919062,2.757015e-7,0.0006906248,0.9609265,0.0058747423,0.00049468357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013434392,0.00057700154,0.000052367326,0.00035999113,0.00038896909,0.000040257582,0.037709925,0.000076436176,0.0035627312,0.6876096,0.2674162,0.0008630522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039800315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007979415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6178361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020748661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000090087255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001160245","doi":"10.3366/dls.2011.0040","title":"A Criminal Intrigue: An Interview with Jean-Clet Martin","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deleuze Studies","topic":"Contemporary Literature and Criticism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Philosophy; Reading (process); Epistemology; Dialectic; Psychoanalysis; Literature; Art; Psychology","score_opus":0.23898525556842076,"score_gpt":0.2895971237502075,"score_spread":0.05061186818178676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001160245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42512056,0.02723758,0.00016849092,0.0021937613,0.001215091,0.00055552623,0.00006690784,0.0004585422,0.54298353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896907,0.00009075848,0.00021380332,0.0016661299,0.0004993961,0.00004903661,0.000011731583,0.000021761856,0.0077566574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999085,0.000073080795,0.00023376895,0.00024054898,0.0001281403,0.00023943548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993794,0.000035549892,0.000056959176,0.00023154865,0.00023462765,0.00006191145],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016343268,0.00019696988,0.00028253993,0.00007016481,0.00025804737,0.00010208823,0.00015338763,0.000022076842,0.0011981411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001906234,0.00013058446,0.0000603404,0.000033505105,0.00032025902,0.00042543793,0.00006700593,0.00013012826,0.000081973],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016417797,0.00022156173,0.00019423671,0.00022579472,0.0003280528,0.00019390283,0.34090802,3.6312e-8,0.000004338769,0.61582893,0.017407786,0.024523173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005818735,0.0013883647,0.00027121176,0.0003026313,0.00024348813,0.00001789354,0.099187315,0.000014969568,0.00011657014,0.00727596,0.89012086,0.0004788342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008538234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002567206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8727131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011889879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001507346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010971541","doi":"10.3366/dls.2015.0173","title":"Cicero's<i>De Fato</i>in Deleuze's Logic of Sense","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deleuze Studies","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Cicero; Epistemology; Philosophy; Context (archaeology); Scholarship; Compatibilism; Determinism; Inference; Literature; History; Art; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.30401949773275444,"score_gpt":0.3427124289538361,"score_spread":0.03869293122108164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010971541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5298239,0.009011562,0.000043455133,0.004743176,0.0009887302,0.0002770986,0.00006664227,0.00014550243,0.45489994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99665177,0.00018293847,0.000111389105,0.000584804,0.00060163584,0.000016655771,0.0000035873038,0.0000145942295,0.001832597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989453,0.000071348484,0.00031384546,0.0001954887,0.0001933728,0.0002806327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992826,0.0001521345,0.00009191903,0.00018086875,0.0002158744,0.00007662814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027736352,0.00016409346,0.00038517505,0.00008772125,0.00009952513,0.0000240877,0.00010090988,0.000041148112,0.000052700787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019346704,0.00012790898,0.00009473294,0.0000721271,0.0005849921,0.000112198184,0.00009684746,0.00014382231,0.00005823862],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007515353,0.00015261178,0.00040212696,0.000066247834,0.00012168191,0.00006664705,0.031357933,0.00004827841,0.0000414198,0.95522034,0.011480805,0.0009667483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014820526,0.00038579584,0.00022525729,0.00012202472,0.00008532771,0.000012353641,0.02575798,0.00016399902,0.000497915,0.63335294,0.33746642,0.0004479382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013033679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011923288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4668279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000687038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036848553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5215976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011595079","doi":"10.3366/dls.2012.0073","title":"Samuel Fuller's Schizo-violent Cinema and the Affective Politics of War","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deleuze Studies","topic":"Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Movie theater; Action (physics); Politics; Sociology; Criminology; Obstacle; History; Aesthetics; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Law; Political science; Art; Art history","score_opus":0.04191296988720099,"score_gpt":0.3853356448662612,"score_spread":0.3434226749790602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011595079","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84864914,0.09167099,0.0027280038,0.004899648,0.00057276606,0.0011468636,0.00005789947,0.00015157642,0.050123088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949376,0.0030888868,0.00056591636,0.00045533403,0.00020494859,0.00027970984,0.000001210088,0.000013646377,0.00045273395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999311,0.000080381775,0.00016975345,0.0001320548,0.00007438772,0.00023245442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992597,0.0002639373,0.000088138346,0.00028681586,0.00006345914,0.000037958132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002663814,0.00011303386,0.00023192415,0.000037901184,0.00014878881,0.0000028343352,0.0000976196,0.00004313033,0.00004586664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021982765,0.00006894717,0.000060581206,0.000096863136,0.00042207874,0.000026432266,0.000045210945,0.0000911408,0.000013900914],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000117898475,0.00024704228,0.008066613,0.000027073293,0.0007650944,3.3294916e-7,0.0208118,2.598329e-7,0.00016132779,0.9283533,0.028001731,0.01344751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010689781,0.0008667214,0.28674564,0.00023653146,0.0006379225,0.000092473674,0.08117655,0.00003833666,0.0031747904,0.21458432,0.400656,0.0011009247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008058396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000942822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.713769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013723964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003955711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28115842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013708954","doi":"10.3366/dls.2012.0077","title":"Nathan Widder (2008) <i>Reflections on Time and Politics</i>, University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deleuze Studies","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of King's College","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Politics; Sociology; Political science; Management; Environmental ethics; Economic history; Economics; Philosophy; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07732080568790659,"score_gpt":0.3378411435124296,"score_spread":0.260520337824523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013708954","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58786947,0.002931254,0.00005263721,0.006618695,0.0013005397,0.00042192102,0.00020019927,0.000337395,0.40026787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9288799,0.005759141,0.00014853405,0.00028513983,0.000251603,4.3493205e-7,0.0000039733804,0.000011190968,0.06466004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986548,0.00027043908,0.00008146966,0.00021013126,0.0002552522,0.0005279485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990692,0.0003353128,0.00006002842,0.00012929967,0.00019889322,0.00020728105],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038714404,0.00013800763,0.0001879572,0.00007266596,0.001778142,0.0000249685,0.00014056741,0.000091141934,0.000027439417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018573791,0.0001433328,0.00005125118,0.00019869392,0.000808333,0.00035552436,0.00013045124,0.0002243191,0.00006265329],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017416952,0.0005115533,0.008699675,0.00007599808,0.00090452214,0.00006324044,0.41811264,0.000038291728,0.00013318351,0.4343489,0.13539396,0.0015438611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025952022,0.00005977756,0.0029113884,0.000015680214,0.00007065577,0.0000011783297,0.030656539,0.0000044689937,0.000037095484,0.0008356368,0.96494216,0.00020590198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003176538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030987998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8295482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022048035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009637841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99952143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025417133","doi":"10.3366/e1750224110000796","title":"McDeleuze: What's More Rhizomal than the Big Mac?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deleuze Studies","topic":"Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Deleuze and Guattari; Scholarship; Corporation; Sociology; Power (physics); Salient; Popularity; Control (management); Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.07183025543702425,"score_gpt":0.39031915568173603,"score_spread":0.31848890024471177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025417133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8484404,0.017355578,0.000036033794,0.024636904,0.015451288,0.00037887256,0.00006026543,0.00023064855,0.093409985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847831,0.001040323,0.000080304526,0.004227976,0.0038533753,0.00011910021,0.000013371367,0.000048368813,0.0058340947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979378,0.00013355025,0.00041319345,0.0004965351,0.00032676093,0.0006921527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99798274,0.0003877437,0.0001506701,0.0011419548,0.00022492728,0.00011195308],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037351047,0.00035302652,0.00045775948,0.00014222141,0.0004840477,0.00012465206,0.0006188731,0.00016958604,0.00029290386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011668476,0.00023267994,0.00028382702,0.0003767466,0.00070624985,0.00016152926,0.0001538996,0.0006478865,0.000813845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036852303,0.0008924429,0.039877173,0.00011760301,0.0105251055,0.00024249488,0.0678636,0.000011170368,0.0007567936,0.51667356,0.21326219,0.14940934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018896428,0.00030239252,0.08095906,0.0000621076,0.0010092504,0.00017462845,0.052567437,0.000057143297,0.00027673598,0.07257181,0.7889025,0.0012272956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018635843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007105928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5756403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025100744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003522405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054518923","doi":"10.3366/dls.2011.0004","title":"Autism: Schizo of Postmodern Capital","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deleuze Studies","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Postmodernism; Autism; Articulation (sociology); Argument (complex analysis); Representation (politics); Schizophrenia (object-oriented programming); Capitalism; Limit (mathematics); Epistemology; Capital (architecture); Psychology; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Aesthetics; Philosophy; History; Developmental psychology; Medicine; Psychiatry; Political science","score_opus":0.1555977176817808,"score_gpt":0.37525316351457577,"score_spread":0.21965544583279498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054518923","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77805084,0.006050659,0.000041408694,0.002414528,0.0011984187,0.0001555575,0.0000130486405,0.000111374095,0.21196418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956118,0.0017468045,0.00058529107,0.00013775485,0.00009350932,0.000005915927,7.2951434e-7,0.000008036179,0.0018101566],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901867,0.00008198206,0.00017681834,0.00015156617,0.00029590557,0.00027505183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944025,0.000105569685,0.00007725545,0.00013447188,0.00018298563,0.000059455982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040190868,0.00009288877,0.0002031483,0.000043138505,0.00039099166,0.000008943472,0.00019303971,0.000085494714,0.000086202446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037415363,0.00008128561,0.00007167142,0.00012331511,0.000893096,0.00013170805,0.00008075094,0.00012757751,0.00007093377],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021202904,0.00006609383,0.0049997987,0.000027810745,0.00014622931,0.0000075646467,0.6375237,5.2164495e-7,0.000028900966,0.35305974,0.0017167787,0.0024016292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085647934,0.00046293932,0.053331472,0.00014649828,0.00017411448,0.0000041334574,0.46742725,0.000019986883,0.0006814705,0.35884398,0.11723312,0.00081855326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003971796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0079270825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21756098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003192001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010667779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60041934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089958573","doi":"10.3366/e1750224108000044","title":"Citizen Kant: Flatness and Depth in the Image of Thought","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deleuze Studies","topic":"Philosophical and Historical Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Movie theater; Reading (process); Film theory; Painting; Aesthetics; Flatness (cosmology); Epistemology; Sociology; Visual arts; Art; Philosophy; Linguistics; Physics","score_opus":0.07944117864321223,"score_gpt":0.3857384117150641,"score_spread":0.30629723307185186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089958573","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59407735,0.026173238,0.00009075091,0.016916653,0.00031660992,0.00030246403,0.000005715087,0.000045306013,0.36207193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99624926,0.0029527247,0.00015410838,0.0001932969,0.0002366396,0.000008232216,1.9919072e-7,0.000003063218,0.00020246395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990883,0.00008389431,0.00018999816,0.00012935395,0.00026972935,0.00023875508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999263,0.0004943382,0.000049908896,0.000071067574,0.00008994358,0.000031728458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010568072,0.00007792003,0.00022140979,0.00003993349,0.00047773632,0.000010181694,0.00015003703,0.000036254012,0.0000032493135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004961973,0.000047540314,0.000037441423,0.00034241905,0.0009553214,0.00006016818,0.000082649734,0.000097330165,0.000003032595],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008035864,0.00017945835,0.0272693,0.000096934746,0.00015636851,0.00007218395,0.19778074,4.2859153e-7,0.00020420436,0.7279873,0.003627832,0.04254492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087296125,0.00016519218,0.22334711,0.00009117035,0.00008892543,0.0000029703897,0.13364251,0.0000028153052,0.00019253865,0.35027945,0.29086035,0.00045397083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006417442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011251541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40217194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004621558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011315009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6278624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156633382","doi":"10.3366/e1750224110000772","title":"What Concepts Do: Preface to the Chinese Translation of <i>A Thousand Plateaus</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deleuze Studies","topic":"Posthumanist Ethics and Activism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Relation (database); Epistemology; Reading (process); Discipline; Event (particle physics); Sociology; Key (lock); Close reading; Philosophy; Linguistics; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.0440670010016729,"score_gpt":0.3999242678490403,"score_spread":0.3558572668473674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156633382","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97151405,0.0024005005,0.000038092658,0.012282019,0.0013444185,0.00032135274,0.000009627423,0.00003330464,0.0120566245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973126,0.0015384987,0.000095660376,0.00031356676,0.00024857346,0.00001709468,7.6994183e-7,0.000006509125,0.0004666982],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919224,0.00008110715,0.00013420494,0.00013795301,0.00028437466,0.00017012372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922913,0.0003742075,0.00006594344,0.0001448078,0.00014583483,0.00004008684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077413407,0.000086423286,0.00015397536,0.000021067484,0.00061804906,0.00008897739,0.00020243638,0.000059237107,0.000021971382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021978818,0.000052184867,0.000048348164,0.00017865344,0.0004214865,0.00026240342,0.000038122478,0.00019411051,0.000011467938],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049806466,0.00008022854,0.0031112772,0.000034053548,0.00017775467,0.0000021739254,0.85798985,0.000045902376,0.0100620845,0.06336272,0.002493642,0.0625905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007536013,0.00017655785,0.017089307,0.00013926509,0.000075191965,0.0000016810858,0.120440245,0.00003780073,0.0032591033,0.048659902,0.8088612,0.0005061329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025862028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014111036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8063676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009785077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004270861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.787429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2495377279","doi":"10.3366/dls.2016.0231","title":"The Open Society and the Democracy to Come: Bergson, Deleuze and Guattari","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deleuze Studies","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Deleuze and Guattari; Open society; Democracy; Sociology; Immanence; Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.09324444690143469,"score_gpt":0.32081260095854053,"score_spread":0.22756815405710584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2495377279","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19461875,0.029187497,0.000077815195,0.6748575,0.0024872117,0.0017602731,0.0001580232,0.00015019551,0.09670277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97322035,0.006480037,0.00007245202,0.006463805,0.00087903783,0.00009577844,0.0000012985594,0.000021933656,0.012765335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887085,0.00010787098,0.00026112728,0.00027584718,0.00018666449,0.00029764677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982348,0.0010750074,0.0000848539,0.00029328009,0.00024586188,0.000066180386],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008857234,0.00019150844,0.00031308326,0.000015765661,0.003199969,0.00051433727,0.0004063131,0.00003739108,0.000025455081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024816438,0.0000778299,0.00008562725,0.000027127204,0.0024254858,0.00024003682,0.0009076323,0.0001287295,0.000027907226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000106689695,0.000012734147,0.00018870775,0.000023043494,0.00047580007,0.0000012973503,0.07715657,1.7489641e-7,0.000010407805,0.8387036,0.07671027,0.006610733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001330834,0.00006298866,0.0002822103,0.000055964963,0.00009160096,0.000003967927,0.015993785,0.00000803097,0.000011969598,0.2953158,0.6866491,0.0001937624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039531328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043331385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7786016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024466692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023062146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2574641308","doi":"10.3366/dls.2017.0254","title":"The Death of Gilles Deleuze as Composition of a Concept","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deleuze Studies","topic":"Posthumanist Ethics and Activism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Event (particle physics); Connection (principal bundle); Composition (language); Range (aeronautics); Philosophy; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Mathematics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.11743170630915832,"score_gpt":0.4215313848872549,"score_spread":0.30409967857809656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2574641308","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8067371,0.004332473,0.000049410104,0.0059870416,0.00042655,0.0002492783,0.000023557157,0.00002595926,0.18216863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973764,0.0019494904,0.000054931912,0.000049970837,0.00008586954,0.0000079311585,6.7706657e-7,0.000004661255,0.00047009232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991651,0.0000957073,0.00017393222,0.000103383165,0.00029402913,0.0001678081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986698,0.00041476733,0.00031606577,0.00023984697,0.00033308176,0.000026447082],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005664295,0.00007217811,0.00019529082,0.000015551075,0.0026398813,0.00003862341,0.00037001437,0.000045083318,0.000006089274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005179746,0.00004894717,0.00007207313,0.000024061044,0.0018407545,0.00010950734,0.000119285156,0.00008577277,0.0000029206117],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001634243,0.000029689216,0.001634169,0.000010624309,0.00015735993,0.000001567001,0.01833377,0.0000017952932,0.0003632108,0.97524667,0.00020171342,0.0040031015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015319831,0.00066522596,0.0605152,0.00050410465,0.00029419878,0.00000366528,0.11416795,0.00006646278,0.036981255,0.6222063,0.1623844,0.0006792651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033185836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016524402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35304037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028053342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000076110584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99865854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737480333","doi":"10.3366/dls.2017.0272","title":"The Anticipations of Sensation: Deleuze and Kant on the Intensive Ground of Sensible Experience","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deleuze Studies","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Transcendental number; Sensation; Philosophy; Common ground; Epistemology; Intensity (physics); Psychology; Aesthetics; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Physics; Optics","score_opus":0.2403789757843262,"score_gpt":0.3620430299226214,"score_spread":0.12166405413829517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737480333","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96266866,0.001083149,0.000004564454,0.011870827,0.00077781256,0.0001602879,0.000030443434,0.0000118145545,0.023392467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977812,0.0008660782,0.00000954312,0.0003467281,0.0002676098,0.000014923391,9.213887e-7,0.0000066309067,0.0007063469],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992732,0.000050323062,0.00023903413,0.00012621697,0.00018258994,0.00012867492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99788266,0.0005249389,0.00026265575,0.0004019622,0.0009110269,0.000016749002],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002489061,0.00010301543,0.00020079245,0.000025192861,0.0022120343,0.00011074535,0.00017051409,0.000021886563,0.000008352418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082718814,0.000054458633,0.000056975936,0.000012473142,0.0029261466,0.00011540634,0.00012922453,0.00009979862,0.0000036265687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023493858,0.000013259539,0.00018807499,0.000028488956,0.00016144165,0.0000017196559,0.15541866,0.0000018982092,0.000094041905,0.8427556,0.00093648257,0.00037678782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008388913,0.0005463357,0.013582585,0.00048096725,0.000288694,0.000011344845,0.6419988,0.000463301,0.0036089863,0.27897796,0.058697827,0.0005043024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047158173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018893055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5637777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008410294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017182281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W278171073","doi":"10.3366/dls.2017.0250","title":"‘A Part’ of the World: Deleuze and the Logic of Creation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deleuze Studies","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Contemplation; Realm; Philosophy; Epistemology; Scholarship; Continental philosophy; Action (physics); Order (exchange); Sociology; Aesthetics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.14925363601378058,"score_gpt":0.33453520236120593,"score_spread":0.18528156634742535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W278171073","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2781051,0.01114543,0.0000049091295,0.032469377,0.0025477943,0.00050580135,0.00009349612,0.000033084325,0.675095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917015,0.00073915295,0.000009078418,0.00029251704,0.00047413353,0.000013640488,9.770835e-7,0.0000058869264,0.0067631127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933743,0.000069060705,0.00022805069,0.0001053911,0.00015777459,0.00010226605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988675,0.00019733305,0.00030743855,0.00038326328,0.00023280256,0.000011624143],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034501587,0.000094237745,0.0002590061,0.000027035248,0.0010877739,0.00006265897,0.00025075735,0.000020305566,0.00003255769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028300265,0.000045066034,0.00010009563,0.000012923063,0.0036349124,0.00009738128,0.00019127749,0.00009533436,0.0000027349283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003941253,0.000016601049,0.00044009948,0.00006542102,0.000186258,2.8307716e-7,0.026567703,0.0000015084717,0.000007162305,0.9698524,0.0022540628,0.00056910224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016786187,0.00007765602,0.004537288,0.00024632906,0.00038322253,0.0000015913074,0.013305861,0.0000497825,0.0004094454,0.77477455,0.20432465,0.00021097604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033268653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005260965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7135964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000062135628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012000896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}