{"meta":{"query_hash":"c6e6fab082be","filters":{"venue":"Deusto Journal of Human Rights"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/c6e6fab082be","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Deusto+Journal+of+Human+Rights"},"results":[{"id":"W2790615635","doi":"10.18543/aahdh-8-2011pp27-36","title":"After the Bouchard-Taylor Commission: Religious Accommodation and Human Rights in Quebec","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deusto Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reasonable accommodation; Secularism; Commission; Accommodation; Legitimacy; Politics; Human rights; Political science; Meaning (existential); Law; Obligation; Legislation; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Public administration; Religious discrimination","score_opus":0.07579398145382696,"score_gpt":0.4022135867523737,"score_spread":0.32641960529854674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790615635","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030465912,0.04432334,0.0009144932,0.7769836,0.010377272,0.00017318956,0.0010624132,0.000090323374,0.13560951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27753022,0.012669803,0.0015964952,0.1807545,0.0013646076,0.00012969886,0.0003811269,0.0001063627,0.52546716],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966846,0.0006411571,0.00008742155,0.00028338656,0.0010935549,0.001209811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99523526,0.0015828648,0.00013355492,0.00014057086,0.002177749,0.0007299243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037303607,0.00035453605,0.00042235325,0.0006799566,0.014396747,0.007562836,0.001774235,0.011850495,0.012513229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00581084,0.00033389413,0.00041925965,0.0014441719,0.0053566457,0.0019666194,0.0014896798,0.0068739597,0.0007478081],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005281778,0.00005017636,0.0034730027,0.00019739773,0.000015914271,0.00070611574,0.0071556196,0.00048112328,0.00056550466,0.15695421,0.80419475,0.02615332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020447675,0.0000157909,0.00912774,0.0003479305,0.0000137863535,0.000083253355,0.0054163486,0.0002272564,0.00039052134,0.0026095957,0.9816664,0.00008089903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98464125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99225944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05956313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05956313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10279934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43216276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794379701","doi":"10.18543/aahdh-8-2011pp55-70","title":"Freedom of religion versus freedom of business management in Spain: Spanish Case-law analyzed in the light of “reasonable accommodation” figure according to Canadian Case-law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deusto Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; Law; Duty; Common law; Obligation; Judgement; Reasonable accommodation; Labour law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.03418002145604547,"score_gpt":0.3125540892297254,"score_spread":0.2783740677736799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794379701","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43553814,0.0116417175,0.002287026,0.021782186,0.00025037615,0.00021362404,0.00049722276,0.00003488426,0.5277549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98047286,0.0023163718,0.00079658785,0.0021690675,0.00006203834,0.000042594846,0.00017747024,0.000017946864,0.013944965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995522,0.0010135997,0.00015660623,0.0003298082,0.0012042891,0.0017736512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945927,0.0023197362,0.00045589232,0.00040946872,0.0017710612,0.00045101438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00676979,0.00024782406,0.0006310795,0.002453589,0.0054217624,0.00738317,0.001382118,0.0030963125,0.0039684363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011611899,0.00017877124,0.00058509613,0.0034623146,0.008317434,0.0015989245,0.0024848222,0.0028416365,0.0002177586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010659887,0.00012058608,0.015798857,0.00016485307,0.000026795258,0.00149141,0.009945683,0.0012197011,0.00025842985,0.94283897,0.014471236,0.013556901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022005253,0.00012947316,0.102433205,0.0026938487,0.0002343658,0.0019209245,0.082327135,0.00787166,0.0009848757,0.20473504,0.5961509,0.00029853426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.69529665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6371991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30470335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034814525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026069812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6129956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382776485","doi":"10.18543/djhr.2774","title":"The price of protest","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deusto Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Elite; Political economy; Privilege (computing); Legislature; Political science; Property rights; Status quo; Politics; Development economics; Law and economics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.03281616641325723,"score_gpt":0.28771094036146894,"score_spread":0.2548947739482117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382776485","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032380346,0.004913058,0.006490831,0.33303145,0.0077706967,0.00006715303,0.00024750264,0.00021236409,0.61488664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6779279,0.0025895608,0.00190813,0.12068995,0.008086037,0.00015470253,0.00018041937,0.0003395848,0.1881237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99470633,0.0012612245,0.0001221278,0.00067014946,0.0022848032,0.0009554385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98787165,0.0051613604,0.000966243,0.00095793634,0.0017562193,0.0032866192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046156473,0.00045868463,0.0005411627,0.000945746,0.0032629052,0.008118509,0.00084115786,0.005183486,0.05976226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025474805,0.00023940342,0.0003850644,0.00053716655,0.0052978927,0.0060637463,0.004129977,0.0075955507,0.0071692313],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010825475,0.000073035175,0.0018656983,0.00009172386,0.00002789949,0.00029362945,0.0010228327,0.00047610363,0.00043373773,0.6329168,0.2903142,0.07237605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044863402,0.00010873436,0.005726713,0.00030970987,0.000009419049,0.00041372952,0.0021453323,0.0007242634,0.00028719302,0.17970122,0.8104972,0.00003165796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020851584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039566527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05976226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033039453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00238896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1999247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}