{"meta":{"query_hash":"c6e6fab082be","filters":{"venue":"Deusto Journal of Human Rights"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/c6e6fab082be","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Deusto+Journal+of+Human+Rights"},"results":[{"id":"W2790615635","doi":"10.18543/aahdh-8-2011pp27-36","title":"After the Bouchard-Taylor Commission: Religious Accommodation and Human Rights in Quebec","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deusto Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reasonable accommodation; Secularism; Commission; Accommodation; Legitimacy; Politics; Human rights; Political science; Meaning (existential); Law; Obligation; Legislation; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Public administration; Religious discrimination","score_opus":0.07579398145382696,"score_gpt":0.4022135867523737,"score_spread":0.32641960529854674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790615635","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9894203,0.00011975411,0.000005526796,0.003743866,0.00030664256,0.000199173,0.000002713473,0.000012263132,0.0061897687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913364,0.000005834182,0.000056678087,0.0002171401,0.00079272455,0.000004329848,0.0000028498378,0.000007757872,0.0075762714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981747,0.00032690886,0.0005322983,0.00016276038,0.0005085174,0.00029477978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99842453,0.00007407732,0.00062849734,0.00038568478,0.00030011102,0.00018709817],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000792631,0.00015983655,0.00025617104,0.00013085261,0.0038750228,0.0006429664,0.0006520231,0.00013281807,0.00019307151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048796697,0.000092350594,0.00010118782,0.00003505914,0.0007995348,0.00087683677,0.000065081826,0.00033030473,0.000014338663],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019565622,0.00045962786,0.072599865,0.000046327557,0.00020098909,0.00048671963,0.32544732,0.000016881251,0.0011994772,0.5278471,0.07105128,0.00044874326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012725445,0.000083846484,0.40005207,0.00014558407,0.00007371029,0.000038363964,0.0020522466,0.000011967046,0.00053059537,0.035782766,0.55962837,0.00032791484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12949708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7015852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5720881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043077584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000912132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794379701","doi":"10.18543/aahdh-8-2011pp55-70","title":"Freedom of religion versus freedom of business management in Spain: Spanish Case-law analyzed in the light of “reasonable accommodation” figure according to Canadian Case-law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deusto Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; Law; Duty; Common law; Obligation; Judgement; Reasonable accommodation; Labour law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.03418002145604547,"score_gpt":0.3125540892297254,"score_spread":0.2783740677736799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794379701","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8761628,0.00015945068,0.000037433783,0.0014139215,0.00044941434,0.00046021826,0.00001629604,0.000004228405,0.121296234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99927706,0.000030166817,0.00035349006,0.000035729558,0.0001966137,0.000005528723,0.0000051465177,0.00001132872,0.00008491386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763924,0.00027654768,0.000882148,0.00019385123,0.0006576891,0.00035051038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99746966,0.0001426979,0.0010514313,0.00046050164,0.00070432026,0.00017140478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018981845,0.00017326191,0.00048588467,0.00061851804,0.0010061448,0.00015800376,0.00096585945,0.00014224392,0.000035813202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015149024,0.00013385176,0.00014191653,0.0004492509,0.00035389178,0.0006931597,0.00006656788,0.00020427722,0.000002030053],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002345784,0.00023994307,0.002005274,0.00009487767,0.00010677331,0.00778872,0.0109398505,0.0015407683,0.00021490523,0.9721831,0.0043204674,0.00033074617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.056571737,0.0040250514,0.11395003,0.009498759,0.0038731487,0.0062463335,0.19974582,0.001341262,0.0064403675,0.49967465,0.093708865,0.0049239616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8506256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97214895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47250843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033332178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018543248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7738554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382776485","doi":"10.18543/djhr.2774","title":"The price of protest","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deusto Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Elite; Political economy; Privilege (computing); Legislature; Political science; Property rights; Status quo; Politics; Development economics; Law and economics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.03281616641325723,"score_gpt":0.28771094036146894,"score_spread":0.2548947739482117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382776485","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945331,0.000026154621,0.00002350801,0.00086705945,0.00006817809,0.0000464791,3.1571443e-7,0.000008101866,0.004427083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967683,0.0000065283134,0.00006304714,0.000075777185,0.000034600373,0.0000012117312,3.9830343e-7,0.0000028134834,0.0030473152],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930876,0.00005354966,0.00026791092,0.000053192856,0.00020925088,0.00010730831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947494,0.0000883648,0.00025383476,0.00011612402,0.000027220276,0.00003949367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036781415,0.000048094833,0.00009177702,0.00004592555,0.0003383973,0.000010344133,0.00028149202,0.000027975802,0.00057039806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003274623,0.00002611235,0.00006225376,0.00017083607,0.00022846363,0.000101224534,0.00004335003,0.00010903987,0.00020512735],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016810694,0.0004174052,0.39742368,0.00003523826,0.00035962823,0.00037078394,0.0037396953,0.0014149197,0.0491271,0.049006756,0.4938054,0.0041312817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048414763,0.0002789116,0.7734309,0.000032046777,0.000059650818,0.00008306233,0.00020257161,0.00011238719,0.008749329,0.036058497,0.18037912,0.00012936136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003108302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013514434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3760072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020117506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008433168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6245459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}