{"meta":{"query_hash":"f76dd2440a91","filters":{"venue":"Dialogic Pedagogy A Journal for Studies of Dialogic Education"},"cohort_total":14,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"exported":14,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/f76dd2440a91","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Dialogic+Pedagogy+A+Journal+for+Studies+of+Dialogic+Education"},"results":[{"id":"W2162412942","doi":"10.5195/dpj.2013.20","title":"An Integrated Theory of Thinking and Speaking that Draws on Vygotsky and Bakhtin/Vološinov","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogic Pedagogy A Journal for Studies of Dialogic Education","topic":"Innovative Education and Learning Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogical self; Utterance; Epistemology; Vernacular; Sociology; Psychology; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.17200614850221582,"score_gpt":0.4846506930901475,"score_spread":0.31264454458793167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162412942","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98477715,0.002697594,0.00030894214,0.004543144,0.001757023,0.00045478696,0.0000030269805,0.000020439764,0.005437916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99506265,0.001704815,0.0018804137,0.00053878204,0.00045172303,0.000043559055,0.000008131911,0.0000094118095,0.00030053768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980397,0.000842909,0.00040540338,0.00021811746,0.00025262576,0.00024119487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958769,0.0020020765,0.0009123912,0.000111274465,0.0010098108,0.000087566455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035518142,0.00015638802,0.00034179902,0.00025559438,0.001112226,0.0001252942,0.00019796344,0.00010833546,0.00011116092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052919644,0.0001172558,0.000055425775,0.0002026452,0.00072983,0.0006292611,0.000029090334,0.00028798214,0.000002153336],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015107654,0.0008530465,0.059290577,0.000103027895,0.00022516708,4.3699703e-7,0.3286581,0.000007960418,0.0006528806,0.37719548,0.0015950005,0.23126724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006260416,0.0009466142,0.122027084,0.0002278402,0.000102774604,0.000009661671,0.6822969,0.000007129378,0.00019973706,0.17676197,0.016533235,0.00026104783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005267914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020225633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35363877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007213312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052203506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8554456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2305398942","doi":"10.5195/dpj.2016.160","title":"Classroom community and discourse: How argumentation emerges during a Socratic circle","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogic Pedagogy A Journal for Studies of Dialogic Education","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogic; Argumentation theory; Socratic method; Meaning (existential); Construct (python library); Literacy; Discourse analysis; Pedagogy; Sociology; Socratic questioning; Mathematics education; Epistemology; Psychology; Linguistics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09726613931437307,"score_gpt":0.4587777662546706,"score_spread":0.36151162694029754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2305398942","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94522107,0.002044063,0.00065260875,0.048259772,0.0025517482,0.00037912658,0.000008377169,0.000028740998,0.0008544889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99124,0.005309071,0.0011654858,0.00029685674,0.00049501564,0.00011788225,0.000006362374,0.000008921834,0.0013603844],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825114,0.00061051466,0.00036741333,0.00016416065,0.00028703207,0.00031972493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978246,0.001043955,0.00032652743,0.0001264163,0.0005322392,0.00014623805],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016750315,0.0001366756,0.00028659985,0.00012903722,0.002135543,0.000076512566,0.00020231579,0.00008556018,0.000040643088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030799075,0.00010109485,0.0000925172,0.00012633749,0.0006710634,0.00036452795,0.00004976013,0.0001705131,0.0000027760238],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018294281,0.0018563644,0.090586804,0.00060141453,0.0006870446,0.0000019770769,0.44161412,0.0000021084302,0.008382266,0.21461755,0.011288205,0.23017919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009929121,0.0002743133,0.10350883,0.00032659978,0.0001302572,0.000010232972,0.3983659,3.3695522e-7,0.0004367273,0.49180388,0.0038450928,0.00030488806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008468298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052435236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27718633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032189582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076488254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99916357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2522667986","doi":"10.5195/dpj.2016.182","title":"Disengagement, Pedagogical Eros and (the undoing of?) Dialogic pedagogy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogic Pedagogy A Journal for Studies of Dialogic Education","topic":"Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Booth University College","funders":"University of Pittsburgh","keywords":"Dialogic; Pedagogy; Disengagement theory; Power (physics); Sociology; Psychology; Identity (music); Undoing; Critical pedagogy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.1310321322227567,"score_gpt":0.47967862200088396,"score_spread":0.3486464897781273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2522667986","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77874833,0.113273986,0.0018721626,0.06580012,0.01022504,0.0031616034,0.00009041226,0.00011130735,0.02671702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9689498,0.025668701,0.0005478697,0.00042063132,0.0019221436,0.00019321886,0.000005215513,0.000016840528,0.0022755687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962844,0.0011471241,0.0010287124,0.00041328184,0.000513751,0.0006127338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99292505,0.0047978573,0.0010990067,0.0002625111,0.0007539869,0.00016157242],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038573549,0.00033321022,0.0009719152,0.00021061403,0.002000341,0.00008199092,0.00047828094,0.00018666893,0.000054130374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006725529,0.00017015287,0.00040090876,0.0002679352,0.0029736126,0.00035063762,0.0001803438,0.00027989584,0.000004963531],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000989324,0.00066025305,0.037496805,0.00024726725,0.00087963167,0.0000050899457,0.14930196,0.0000027903302,0.0008849508,0.7103942,0.0122308675,0.08690687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00819995,0.001493036,0.046958636,0.0007603232,0.0011477044,0.000047331938,0.23771949,0.0000011961545,0.00020986586,0.5554876,0.14702334,0.0009515746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013090568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005159695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19020146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012956507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000678648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602963645","doi":"10.5195/dpj.2017.184","title":"Interchangeable Positions in Interaction Sequences in Science Classrooms","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogic Pedagogy A Journal for Studies of Dialogic Education","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Thompson Rivers University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Subject (documents); Perspective (graphical); Style (visual arts); Context (archaeology); Identity (music); Mathematics education; Sequence (biology); Phenomenon; Psychology; Pedagogy; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; World Wide Web; Visual arts","score_opus":0.2812529064326636,"score_gpt":0.5892560698385568,"score_spread":0.30800316340589323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602963645","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9690048,0.0015626004,0.0009793531,0.0029485223,0.01125567,0.00032634873,0.000005049037,0.000013368489,0.013904303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958708,0.00021441904,0.0025813174,0.00015353742,0.00039204015,0.00014981833,0.000005937679,0.0000087016915,0.0006234149],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979838,0.00056469114,0.00058325316,0.0003159484,0.00016500405,0.00038726427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977043,0.00063495093,0.00083203026,0.00029917434,0.00048260056,0.00004694128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060687903,0.00015567408,0.00038138437,0.00082119345,0.0009962288,0.00009096145,0.0005352735,0.000097491735,0.00006121611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00578602,0.00013053206,0.000084667336,0.00027288529,0.00077086134,0.00049790344,0.00008493546,0.00057220797,0.00000738138],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058756216,0.0021230846,0.4818565,0.0001194521,0.0001893111,0.000019713414,0.15995277,0.00016558333,0.009577828,0.08713412,0.0020660392,0.25620803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013181333,0.0011227422,0.78242964,0.00054233265,0.000042198542,0.000105715386,0.113934815,0.00003160565,0.00022279072,0.09666158,0.0032657378,0.00032272364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006512184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005761938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3005731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038035723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004317976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7662287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2725554117","doi":"10.5195/dpj.2017.208","title":"Dialogic & Critical Pedagogies: An Interview with Ira Shor","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogic Pedagogy A Journal for Studies of Dialogic Education","topic":"Critical and Liberation Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ambrose University","funders":"John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Dialogic; Critical pedagogy; Pedagogy; Literacy; Sociology; Critical theory; Democracy; Critical literacy; Psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Politics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.3493047767855719,"score_gpt":0.5743191045232061,"score_spread":0.2250143277376342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2725554117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71375024,0.019121584,0.008519314,0.15830997,0.021284549,0.0031327829,0.00019604317,0.00032883443,0.07535667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835425,0.00395454,0.0043618064,0.001429058,0.0034714204,0.00027237672,0.000043885237,0.000031418414,0.0028930039],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99627537,0.00078110996,0.0009764149,0.0005486321,0.0006214942,0.0007969553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945123,0.0016983137,0.00072673673,0.00064791995,0.0019664513,0.00044824101],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032315713,0.0003729897,0.0008569355,0.00020527614,0.004746882,0.0005455682,0.0010937088,0.00026035725,0.00042155848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016057849,0.00027762784,0.00031206658,0.00012679744,0.0027027102,0.0012730274,0.00015189553,0.00042365285,0.00002728053],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056852103,0.003096651,0.012407298,0.00051706104,0.00045468478,0.000025847494,0.08058804,0.000020722258,0.00036824544,0.76706594,0.017198235,0.11768874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018361524,0.0032584122,0.022226116,0.0005215587,0.00069549505,0.00012375796,0.11570119,0.000009625613,0.00007702747,0.42698476,0.4273153,0.0012506216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004407328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005854554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41011706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019666822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016643408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781750392","doi":"10.5195/dpj.2018.234","title":"M. M. Bakhtin as a University Professor","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogic Pedagogy A Journal for Studies of Dialogic Education","topic":"Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexivity; Perception; Taste; Psychology; Pedagogy; Quarter (Canadian coin); Mathematics education; Sociology; Social science; History","score_opus":0.07736153222096702,"score_gpt":0.46309812106317527,"score_spread":0.38573658884220824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2781750392","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68224937,0.017860953,0.00031832908,0.04018467,0.01794292,0.0016785735,0.000047321824,0.00012528343,0.23959257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97671175,0.0036445493,0.0012976117,0.00064442493,0.0036837517,0.000021456382,0.0000076166075,0.000009749243,0.013979077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828935,0.00039195668,0.0003624211,0.00024940915,0.0002878871,0.00041895406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973108,0.0005819619,0.00048537046,0.00014417408,0.0013527932,0.00012490865],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014195835,0.0001721938,0.0004036054,0.00019249473,0.0023893693,0.000046152833,0.000350809,0.00014656867,0.0000752467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026319856,0.00014020756,0.00020048607,0.0003436232,0.0011548299,0.0002888567,0.000070792485,0.00018487893,0.000027238651],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005850722,0.0012989145,0.01112349,0.00012520964,0.00064911705,0.000008843218,0.23737022,5.5636536e-7,0.0002378907,0.49823445,0.21205933,0.038306892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008987103,0.0009344274,0.004694947,0.00013435604,0.00017313751,0.000011988766,0.20457323,2.7885557e-7,0.00007442192,0.118837595,0.6693973,0.0002695834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016011258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008041974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45733798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018343028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012621814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087218702","doi":"10.5195/dpj.2020.362","title":"Response to “A Student’s Right to Freedom of Education”","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogic Pedagogy A Journal for Studies of Dialogic Education","topic":"Psychology of Development and Education","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ambrose University","funders":"","keywords":"Right to education; Academic freedom; Mathematics education; Political science; Sociology; Pedagogy; Higher education; Law; Psychology; Human rights","score_opus":0.10930233683773521,"score_gpt":0.4735022450982021,"score_spread":0.3641999082604669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087218702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91363555,0.003408644,0.00065879786,0.057610966,0.018532578,0.00125424,0.000029911653,0.00003225792,0.0048370464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812801,0.00015533945,0.006850551,0.0072059333,0.0014793958,0.0005772725,0.00003228858,0.000028432647,0.0023906915],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99721456,0.00042146098,0.0011018035,0.00050258276,0.000314274,0.00044530275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965823,0.0007906121,0.0006979281,0.00034392902,0.0011710275,0.0004141519],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014957854,0.00029917655,0.0006941759,0.00054829597,0.00030672183,0.000024151415,0.00065577566,0.00016891184,0.0003963949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00288161,0.00026526392,0.00021666549,0.00058694644,0.00017229,0.00013559227,0.000098080505,0.00022449336,0.00014690733],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004439341,0.0034070197,0.04724355,0.000108220105,0.0008844809,0.0000024472674,0.1845246,0.00004325776,0.0069965576,0.006875985,0.71642256,0.029051973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020964753,0.0051002223,0.63120335,0.00022188168,0.00031303774,0.00005939564,0.12755668,4.7514197e-7,0.0007568761,0.013638465,0.21833557,0.00071757345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022810458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026336513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5839598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016523826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014103422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3089048962","doi":"10.5195/dpj.2020.357","title":"A student's right to freedom of education and a teacher's fiduciary obligation to support it","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogic Pedagogy A Journal for Studies of Dialogic Education","topic":"Diverse Education Studies and Reforms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Pedagogy; Comprehension; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Political science; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09734133764593836,"score_gpt":0.4550119373091627,"score_spread":0.35767059966322434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3089048962","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88297296,0.0029535654,0.00033070712,0.088415824,0.007929857,0.0019439834,0.00004215541,0.00003407276,0.015376898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98874074,0.0021012635,0.0020856725,0.0032151053,0.0021641331,0.00023028329,0.000020625408,0.000013319997,0.0014288839],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979813,0.00017235994,0.0007226041,0.0003335967,0.000458932,0.0003312069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973241,0.00026912312,0.0005704066,0.00014016149,0.0013029814,0.00039324135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012567759,0.0002009142,0.0005281801,0.0002595429,0.00081729534,0.00005983845,0.00034367462,0.000108225424,0.000108088956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027883544,0.00015744286,0.00015293223,0.00050567527,0.00027900707,0.00028523323,0.00013220219,0.00014488501,0.000014617845],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022579171,0.0017692322,0.029154085,0.00022158967,0.00046125348,8.0484824e-7,0.58426994,0.000056524852,0.0005482162,0.019967012,0.27245194,0.090873614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066051004,0.0019862757,0.044592705,0.00017132152,0.00026005058,0.00000554394,0.6722415,0.0000013775971,0.00011021531,0.009952456,0.26962906,0.0003889865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000356301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004984903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10576777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020899443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018091216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64203334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3090666023","doi":"10.5195/dpj.2020.345","title":"Exploration of students’ thoughts about their right to freedom of education","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogic Pedagogy A Journal for Studies of Dialogic Education","topic":"Educational Philosophies and Pedagogies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Wonder; Academic freedom; Meaning (existential); Transcendental number; Narrative; Sociology; Freedom of thought; Pedagogy; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Higher education; Psychology; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.2075540468558579,"score_gpt":0.4798516929944769,"score_spread":0.27229764613861895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3090666023","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9074699,0.014043435,0.000994087,0.058588296,0.009754649,0.0019054606,0.000114313865,0.000039482984,0.0070903692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869668,0.005582497,0.0021448275,0.0008485885,0.0039103734,0.00017368753,0.00004262408,0.00001559569,0.00031500726],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975052,0.00033494737,0.0010013902,0.00028279005,0.0005946827,0.0002810198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99537104,0.0008309192,0.0011600673,0.00019824432,0.0022215815,0.00021812585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012122834,0.0002202813,0.00062984216,0.0002584743,0.0005733199,0.000040661547,0.0006529632,0.00012986654,0.000050848004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003574115,0.00017911546,0.0002627975,0.00051383494,0.00046201842,0.00053769245,0.00008533767,0.00015704823,0.000004529435],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00060582487,0.0033439002,0.030168936,0.0007168002,0.00068697915,4.1622226e-7,0.6215672,0.000510572,0.0027547535,0.26002866,0.0527733,0.0268427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082758826,0.0018783051,0.021319183,0.00045177675,0.00028947988,0.0000028890431,0.43358043,0.000003132871,0.002183613,0.43152496,0.10743112,0.0005075079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002485392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037808903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18798673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013084836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022057723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7304117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3091555824","doi":"10.5195/dpj.2020.359","title":"Promoting Dialogic Pedagogy through Restricting Technologies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogic Pedagogy A Journal for Studies of Dialogic Education","topic":"Education and Technology Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ambrose University","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogic; Pedagogy; Emerging technologies; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.15924102522245198,"score_gpt":0.47565033429890613,"score_spread":0.31640930907645415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3091555824","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6513798,0.030012334,0.0027640148,0.28637102,0.009541877,0.0026666694,0.000032683052,0.0011541784,0.016077403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834624,0.008676452,0.00465698,0.0011653346,0.0014671276,0.0002915827,0.00003029847,0.00002523254,0.00022457787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99682754,0.00043742417,0.0010690038,0.00053049333,0.00045029682,0.0006852349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99582285,0.0011965323,0.0013207997,0.00026225936,0.0012576794,0.00013985329],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016275991,0.00034041106,0.0007001386,0.00028767405,0.002091475,0.00010634895,0.00079124176,0.00047537647,0.00005606424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0238671,0.00029092355,0.00029609803,0.0007826666,0.0010283203,0.00058849866,0.00012749809,0.0006881287,0.000019334677],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018133942,0.0010609524,0.02784412,0.00037964428,0.00042717974,0.0000080722375,0.35566518,0.000022643271,0.0027607612,0.36727226,0.018738966,0.2256389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082107994,0.001221007,0.0012871929,0.00014857655,0.0002488862,0.000026673426,0.59157944,0.000020933952,0.0015764327,0.30450305,0.09799926,0.00056747097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022946678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004187776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3320826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031252552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020220543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3096713222","doi":"10.5195/dpj.2020.361","title":"A Student's Response to Dr. Matusov’s article, “A Student’s Right to Freedom of Education”","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogic Pedagogy A Journal for Studies of Dialogic Education","topic":"Religious Education and Schools","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ambrose University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Academic freedom; Sociology; Intellectual freedom; Law; Epistemology; Pedagogy; Higher education; Political science; Philosophy; Censorship; Medicine","score_opus":0.07721505992448116,"score_gpt":0.46872335026880285,"score_spread":0.39150829034432166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3096713222","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90173197,0.003163117,0.00037457017,0.08154202,0.0060287877,0.0017695948,0.00002617817,0.000041174684,0.005322562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875722,0.0010164471,0.0021195272,0.004782689,0.001736459,0.0003742876,0.000007692764,0.00002076573,0.002369911],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964876,0.0007755163,0.0010740145,0.00041076905,0.0007598042,0.00049226615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99529743,0.0010198465,0.0006608448,0.0002892599,0.0020100898,0.0007225225],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025173465,0.00025426593,0.00065686594,0.00038068602,0.0008207903,0.0001239814,0.0008275443,0.00013168222,0.00013080821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009126527,0.0002236738,0.00026405812,0.00083965284,0.0002547742,0.00016011257,0.00012661904,0.00022503606,0.00006930907],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013533126,0.0019308515,0.043546285,0.00010729437,0.0004044424,0.0000019719807,0.42242625,0.00019483779,0.0068319393,0.040079184,0.47387677,0.009246836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016441391,0.0029057446,0.27030727,0.00034803717,0.0003839258,0.000010862189,0.51109827,0.0000017195457,0.0009203584,0.056288406,0.15526555,0.0008257123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017806506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022126915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31861123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036001942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038470288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3097619702","doi":"10.5195/dpj.2020.308","title":"Dialogic pedagogy in graduate teacher education research advisement: A narrative account of three teacher educators","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogic Pedagogy A Journal for Studies of Dialogic Education","topic":"Teacher Education and Leadership Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Office of International Science and Engineering; University of Toronto","keywords":"Dialogic; Dialogical self; Pedagogy; Narrative; Teacher education; Class (philosophy); Mathematics education; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.4427130274319962,"score_gpt":0.5591341727856175,"score_spread":0.1164211453536213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3097619702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8522322,0.019963525,0.00006713081,0.114466734,0.004853251,0.002098381,0.000015294212,0.000050999486,0.0062524513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989876,0.004082835,0.00053043896,0.0007756534,0.0031041147,0.0007569039,0.000034351287,0.000037618156,0.0008021139],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99377704,0.0020238848,0.0014513821,0.0006904898,0.0011013784,0.0009558286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99437886,0.0013089201,0.0011684269,0.00032778035,0.002444948,0.0003710607],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006118652,0.0004346613,0.0010426269,0.00079944456,0.00117084,0.00008761012,0.0008614368,0.0003027319,0.00028300512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011433895,0.0003829063,0.00035978717,0.0012453073,0.0016169159,0.00052443927,0.00014518587,0.0011032308,0.000018909004],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025919,0.0031554576,0.08882225,0.00026211308,0.00026090763,9.076416e-7,0.82455695,0.000014310456,0.00017742129,0.012392854,0.031190308,0.03890732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074275496,0.00066073996,0.0680147,0.00018699726,0.00012128011,0.0000028223524,0.8767169,0.0000035072583,0.000046860296,0.03658972,0.01654187,0.00037180597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002233056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047276053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13764374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008561907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008456253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206239052","doi":"10.5195/dpj.2022.497","title":"The University of Students: A place for joint self-education","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogic Pedagogy A Journal for Studies of Dialogic Education","topic":"Educational Innovations and Challenges","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Curiosity; Wonder; Club; Bureaucracy; Civilization; Democracy; Sociology; Pedagogy; Media studies; Aesthetics; Psychology; Political science; Law; Social psychology; Art; Politics","score_opus":0.08159145149971346,"score_gpt":0.39116436975042296,"score_spread":0.3095729182507095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206239052","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82873726,0.041994017,0.0374069,0.068402074,0.019003473,0.0029061572,0.000090435635,0.00009433817,0.0013653173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97522974,0.0035233865,0.019416787,0.00031244816,0.0003398921,0.00025029515,0.000027256157,0.000009228415,0.0008909919],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998579,0.00018215047,0.00046499458,0.0002286576,0.00033755047,0.0002076218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99647766,0.0009119675,0.0008318738,0.00028960087,0.0014406207,0.000048288373],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017525567,0.00012676335,0.00025601566,0.00017786564,0.0019536829,0.00003981873,0.0009922682,0.00003681444,0.000011104665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033609767,0.00010450273,0.00017175432,0.0003209531,0.00011663367,0.00021066208,0.00024559296,0.00015684988,7.186839e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016247533,0.0048885425,0.0020900958,0.0002542988,0.00073207595,3.976284e-7,0.03820296,0.0003782522,0.00031551337,0.7525067,0.123349585,0.07711912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018744527,0.0027656504,0.03744717,0.00010115586,0.00026425332,0.00008226036,0.3711422,0.00043352245,0.00016532683,0.33999473,0.2451993,0.0005299566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021195272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000033685952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41251194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002937974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022225226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99934566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4295949335","doi":"10.5195/dpj.2022.521","title":"Ken Hirschkop’s “new Bakhtin” for the English-speaking students","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogic Pedagogy A Journal for Studies of Dialogic Education","topic":"Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sketch; Key (lock); Literature; Sociology; Linguistics; Classics; Philosophy; History; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.09427817917116343,"score_gpt":0.4648152380201578,"score_spread":0.37053705884899435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4295949335","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36013955,0.2992859,0.0032667902,0.1120684,0.14047182,0.014043499,0.00049656717,0.00039578203,0.06983172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9802637,0.0038979966,0.0010478481,0.0013142294,0.007282721,0.0009179697,0.00002509115,0.000023121873,0.005227341],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99731326,0.0004310284,0.00065644516,0.00031853246,0.0007263518,0.00055438944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99536306,0.0026489827,0.0007686644,0.00021328783,0.0008884096,0.00011757048],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037221815,0.00023353234,0.00050087983,0.00016239347,0.006133635,0.00016337313,0.00095397746,0.0000804655,0.00007831713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004798686,0.00016177591,0.00039467512,0.0003434567,0.00035778474,0.00024493533,0.00024953234,0.00036416747,0.0000015724443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043575277,0.0012255055,0.018840767,0.0000992811,0.0010599,0.0000022067231,0.56735456,0.00008202966,0.00003788358,0.06831395,0.2813485,0.061199654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010751963,0.00049841905,0.0040814164,0.000031419288,0.00026743492,0.000005325735,0.21732908,0.000001043165,0.0000075690245,0.034352023,0.74213475,0.00021632892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019713037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046665728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6201241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031538078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011658898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}