{"meta":{"query_hash":"f76dd2440a91","filters":{"venue":"Dialogic Pedagogy A Journal for Studies of Dialogic Education"},"cohort_total":14,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"exported":14,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/f76dd2440a91","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Dialogic+Pedagogy+A+Journal+for+Studies+of+Dialogic+Education"},"results":[{"id":"W2162412942","doi":"10.5195/dpj.2013.20","title":"An Integrated Theory of Thinking and Speaking that Draws on Vygotsky and Bakhtin/Vološinov","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogic Pedagogy A Journal for Studies of Dialogic Education","topic":"Innovative Education and Learning Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogical self; Utterance; Epistemology; Vernacular; Sociology; Psychology; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.17200614850221582,"score_gpt":0.4846506930901475,"score_spread":0.31264454458793167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162412942","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039976425,0.014045115,0.47492543,0.013635554,0.0008156847,0.0002001151,0.000144031,0.00033915255,0.45591846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8693894,0.0056171273,0.10330259,0.0011596661,0.00048263787,0.0005625533,0.00013123681,0.00013364691,0.019221155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978387,0.0010867342,0.00012625728,0.00031752244,0.00043822822,0.00019263284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985532,0.00081569,0.00017820054,0.00016554403,0.00014759219,0.000139788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029078352,0.0007435788,0.0009078135,0.0030373775,0.0022123293,0.008077809,0.0014799837,0.0018673962,0.0036369993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023293067,0.00027681162,0.0011960742,0.0021875123,0.020168213,0.009258005,0.003976124,0.0028735104,0.00081612816],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003561698,0.000006804784,0.00012804114,0.000037223523,0.000004628689,0.000025557943,0.0038255365,0.00021131847,0.00007553786,0.9894236,0.00026743414,0.005990727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064902943,0.00001609823,0.0003677097,0.00007332327,0.0000061086957,0.000090604335,0.0019749035,0.0010113566,0.00008687471,0.9753542,0.021003518,0.000008829233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016884425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001199048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008077809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031111622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004002123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022573233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2305398942","doi":"10.5195/dpj.2016.160","title":"Classroom community and discourse: How argumentation emerges during a Socratic circle","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogic Pedagogy A Journal for Studies of Dialogic Education","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogic; Argumentation theory; Socratic method; Meaning (existential); Construct (python library); Literacy; Discourse analysis; Pedagogy; Sociology; Socratic questioning; Mathematics education; Epistemology; Psychology; Linguistics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09726613931437307,"score_gpt":0.4587777662546706,"score_spread":0.36151162694029754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2305398942","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9528983,0.00057645666,0.011838573,0.0012671041,0.000050423812,0.00010304051,0.00003707849,0.00013453353,0.033094473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949162,0.00013074582,0.0031280606,0.000059896687,0.000015256412,0.000048985185,0.000029326198,0.00004211458,0.0016293755],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891306,0.0070884866,0.00027479805,0.0010710274,0.0017298624,0.0007051534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97356266,0.020046417,0.0020008911,0.0013446218,0.0013777456,0.0016677283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069362274,0.00038679206,0.0006381518,0.0035612227,0.008146703,0.0100460695,0.0016468208,0.0026215173,0.002340099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029029636,0.00053128455,0.00049238204,0.0018357473,0.012050464,0.007773987,0.008505012,0.002681335,0.0004971419],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069081216,0.00007453471,0.005611499,0.0001177761,0.000012491379,0.0014233857,0.9589351,0.0001451971,0.004292188,0.015283135,0.0004028396,0.0136328535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000573367,0.00024885268,0.032264985,0.0005347679,0.00004434665,0.0022112655,0.85959387,0.0033238712,0.0050268043,0.03888992,0.057668805,0.000135235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019550063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027409575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0100460695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024847256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018288906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036682665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2522667986","doi":"10.5195/dpj.2016.182","title":"Disengagement, Pedagogical Eros and (the undoing of?) Dialogic pedagogy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogic Pedagogy A Journal for Studies of Dialogic Education","topic":"Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Booth University College","funders":"University of Pittsburgh","keywords":"Dialogic; Pedagogy; Disengagement theory; Power (physics); Sociology; Psychology; Identity (music); Undoing; Critical pedagogy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.1310321322227567,"score_gpt":0.47967862200088396,"score_spread":0.3486464897781273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2522667986","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19505075,0.021740336,0.084566906,0.046503652,0.0008725999,0.0001368259,0.00005636892,0.00021313576,0.65085936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866412,0.0015499241,0.002867413,0.00079259067,0.000096177835,0.00007707366,0.000008378046,0.00003100257,0.007936163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908861,0.006440646,0.00028863785,0.00071206613,0.00095028436,0.00072212995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995352,0.002792938,0.0006881125,0.00059227005,0.00025984412,0.0003148042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006541989,0.0005044297,0.0005954465,0.0012432898,0.0064804084,0.012716505,0.00093769736,0.0024369878,0.0024897356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007154485,0.00028588428,0.00039426936,0.00082815654,0.0492244,0.011952378,0.010961583,0.0041370452,0.00033832033],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011599357,0.000011565833,0.00023740821,0.000060445305,0.0000035667988,0.00009203941,0.059441917,0.00006465543,0.00018955344,0.932165,0.0004724975,0.0072497446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002072644,0.00005598167,0.0009557887,0.00044456907,0.000014050128,0.00048170364,0.057172775,0.00045246494,0.0007553693,0.7974712,0.14214548,0.00002987592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014721319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000923892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012716505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030682466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032343103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034597695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602963645","doi":"10.5195/dpj.2017.184","title":"Interchangeable Positions in Interaction Sequences in Science Classrooms","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogic Pedagogy A Journal for Studies of Dialogic Education","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Thompson Rivers University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Subject (documents); Perspective (graphical); Style (visual arts); Context (archaeology); Identity (music); Mathematics education; Sequence (biology); Phenomenon; Psychology; Pedagogy; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; World Wide Web; Visual arts","score_opus":0.2812529064326636,"score_gpt":0.5892560698385568,"score_spread":0.30800316340589323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602963645","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92612326,0.00085653574,0.047648817,0.0005049326,0.000059094258,0.00024210995,0.00016277902,0.00021149815,0.02419091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835465,0.00017631012,0.014046733,0.000030427638,0.000012878186,0.00015222005,0.000112346585,0.000046063433,0.0018765251],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98996884,0.006191171,0.0005278702,0.0011826354,0.0015533015,0.00057614595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875723,0.0077080973,0.0018148846,0.00090026256,0.0010676129,0.0009368653],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034463562,0.00039933127,0.00041944574,0.003731894,0.0028207453,0.005079008,0.00090551685,0.00096781173,0.0032567559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019673076,0.00050332694,0.0003790368,0.001798827,0.0051166243,0.003793558,0.0047042714,0.0010990236,0.0005691669],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000423035,0.00011504324,0.038433068,0.0004045203,0.000034066543,0.0013901946,0.8037383,0.00094516686,0.019989695,0.049655434,0.0007265838,0.0841449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009446218,0.0005052195,0.14342242,0.00069370464,0.00008212191,0.0041643702,0.6773021,0.012248487,0.0096107405,0.08189925,0.069746286,0.00023085526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024184356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005218509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99717927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00177171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015042968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018226266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2725554117","doi":"10.5195/dpj.2017.208","title":"Dialogic & Critical Pedagogies: An Interview with Ira Shor","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogic Pedagogy A Journal for Studies of Dialogic Education","topic":"Critical and Liberation Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ambrose University","funders":"John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Dialogic; Critical pedagogy; Pedagogy; Literacy; Sociology; Critical theory; Democracy; Critical literacy; Psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Politics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.3493047767855719,"score_gpt":0.5743191045232061,"score_spread":0.2250143277376342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2725554117","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3833126,0.016304519,0.008781313,0.5417629,0.006608852,0.0008569979,0.00017607653,0.0002694905,0.041927345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8780254,0.010025155,0.0060558063,0.08245587,0.0013657731,0.0010266473,0.000065027096,0.0003431499,0.020637108],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96161205,0.02749817,0.000928397,0.0018260573,0.004181705,0.0039536646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9630175,0.021142831,0.00229485,0.00045637044,0.0044529196,0.0086354455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02773301,0.0012380377,0.0023042315,0.0029593208,0.03618239,0.013106886,0.0033043833,0.009660235,0.0030261786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047984224,0.0018874471,0.0010637809,0.0029551522,0.040612187,0.016760806,0.011473112,0.041346807,0.0011602942],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003570987,0.00013432957,0.0005337282,0.00013920736,0.0000035549945,0.001497189,0.9710136,0.00009873116,0.0007484893,0.008754441,0.014101719,0.0029393304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068940103,0.00006972778,0.00026191305,0.00024331397,0.000003051742,0.00059392466,0.9229454,0.00014436072,0.00018706643,0.0015122462,0.073985845,0.000046245703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00968078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00932563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03618239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012435415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013286585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14666796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781750392","doi":"10.5195/dpj.2018.234","title":"M. M. Bakhtin as a University Professor","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogic Pedagogy A Journal for Studies of Dialogic Education","topic":"Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexivity; Perception; Taste; Psychology; Pedagogy; Quarter (Canadian coin); Mathematics education; Sociology; Social science; History","score_opus":0.07736153222096702,"score_gpt":0.46309812106317527,"score_spread":0.38573658884220824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2781750392","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029958887,0.24463786,0.009959228,0.49810398,0.08438794,0.00010607625,0.0004938233,0.0005793879,0.13177277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30576763,0.09031852,0.006829769,0.054323275,0.023679106,0.00015488213,0.00029042148,0.00027689096,0.51835954],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993123,0.00017994737,0.000032991047,0.00018849852,0.00018717564,0.00009912649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849415,0.00012642,0.00009884982,0.000021344933,0.00046120185,0.0007979869],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000987702,0.00034541156,0.0005664399,0.00056593766,0.0015492949,0.0018461505,0.00032958257,0.001143807,0.022081861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023327754,0.00014545105,0.00018424954,0.0003630278,0.0005998765,0.0015547852,0.0009257134,0.0021791966,0.011322329],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013377966,0.00007312088,0.003007678,0.00051858753,0.000015684827,0.0005690876,0.0028423178,0.00022492037,0.0023787871,0.029528387,0.7899109,0.17079668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006995556,0.000052589654,0.001697198,0.00019620747,0.0000070660594,0.0017348373,0.0010816011,0.00015030026,0.00062075217,0.0018914285,0.99254733,0.0000137824845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00072285987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00090283283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022081861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011321898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020611775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073871136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087218702","doi":"10.5195/dpj.2020.362","title":"Response to “A Student’s Right to Freedom of Education”","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogic Pedagogy A Journal for Studies of Dialogic Education","topic":"Psychology of Development and Education","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ambrose University","funders":"","keywords":"Right to education; Academic freedom; Mathematics education; Political science; Sociology; Pedagogy; Higher education; Law; Psychology; Human rights","score_opus":0.10930233683773521,"score_gpt":0.4735022450982021,"score_spread":0.3641999082604669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087218702","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024793966,0.0013567677,0.000091466696,0.97666013,0.019669084,0.000010708476,0.000040676685,0.000022878541,0.0019003452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027214447,0.00050296204,0.000102038226,0.9827963,0.008616865,0.000029717083,0.000014712202,0.00002319506,0.005192728],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946825,0.0019703363,0.00043712006,0.00077853835,0.0012371864,0.0008943147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989167,0.0065521407,0.0006574502,0.00027627443,0.0019100112,0.0014371889],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005074935,0.0014019923,0.0014330476,0.00060399226,0.0051724007,0.0039470317,0.0030157636,0.03950807,0.007782421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025951596,0.0007888178,0.0011749341,0.0005519952,0.007139564,0.0053275162,0.0031023058,0.07051889,0.004106137],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035941037,0.000013500556,0.000086510045,0.000044722863,0.000005247582,0.00019511093,0.0007179322,0.00002595123,0.00012948531,0.004963871,0.99183613,0.0019455269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034943143,0.000048513288,0.0007689449,0.00035411224,0.000010799834,0.0007301961,0.0028385827,0.0001230177,0.00038748718,0.005283047,0.98936355,0.000056768647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008665731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01235783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03950807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042382735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044493023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03075099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3089048962","doi":"10.5195/dpj.2020.357","title":"A student's right to freedom of education and a teacher's fiduciary obligation to support it","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogic Pedagogy A Journal for Studies of Dialogic Education","topic":"Diverse Education Studies and Reforms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Pedagogy; Comprehension; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Political science; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09734133764593836,"score_gpt":0.4550119373091627,"score_spread":0.35767059966322434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3089048962","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010633502,0.0024263521,0.001593508,0.9255387,0.019646876,0.000019188534,0.000041465977,0.000044751636,0.04005567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53972083,0.002789323,0.0015745756,0.37132993,0.017718686,0.00011425452,0.00006104602,0.00028639758,0.06640493],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9848498,0.0085577015,0.00067533425,0.001713451,0.0028115525,0.0013921611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9641399,0.021563746,0.0032640994,0.002213473,0.004385361,0.0044334205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008842067,0.00050587254,0.000728091,0.00038823963,0.010419006,0.013119691,0.0017787733,0.011392999,0.0063175815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040651947,0.00041361133,0.00043267992,0.0006162763,0.03176338,0.011258125,0.0070094257,0.029710582,0.0018218854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066186854,0.000032303662,0.0011806326,0.00016115411,0.000015592066,0.00090573577,0.17723328,0.000091182854,0.0004212844,0.2765528,0.5324324,0.010907556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011696398,0.000027125265,0.0010520733,0.00038746526,0.0000073874844,0.00060966436,0.072648734,0.00018776573,0.0004427014,0.029514452,0.89503795,0.000073100746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006946926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007805508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013119691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042950893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005174246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04676187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3090666023","doi":"10.5195/dpj.2020.345","title":"Exploration of students’ thoughts about their right to freedom of education","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogic Pedagogy A Journal for Studies of Dialogic Education","topic":"Educational Philosophies and Pedagogies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Wonder; Academic freedom; Meaning (existential); Transcendental number; Narrative; Sociology; Freedom of thought; Pedagogy; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Higher education; Psychology; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.2075540468558579,"score_gpt":0.4798516929944769,"score_spread":0.27229764613861895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3090666023","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80837053,0.004398193,0.018292,0.08482211,0.0012678731,0.0000987939,0.000097451186,0.00019310816,0.082459934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908284,0.00062906527,0.00081029965,0.0034585712,0.00009412095,0.000032303727,0.000017608316,0.00005165519,0.004077912],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9853404,0.010244027,0.00032785497,0.000800528,0.002156194,0.0011309598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874143,0.009107504,0.0011197221,0.0005789571,0.00064010406,0.0011394069],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011174179,0.0007049573,0.0009139198,0.0017716897,0.010232585,0.016799275,0.0018140164,0.0047537787,0.0031255851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017851932,0.0005584903,0.0008700756,0.001134839,0.041234516,0.012490863,0.011244746,0.01604333,0.00053145643],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019152914,0.000031610027,0.0011545605,0.00004328101,0.000006424583,0.00026855356,0.9344876,0.000072262286,0.00048538393,0.058146317,0.001703027,0.0035818005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012894263,0.000066345405,0.0009173553,0.00023337509,0.0000096934355,0.00060098554,0.86482066,0.00034127285,0.00083581446,0.03474573,0.09734746,0.00006847181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001797759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001792836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016799275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004248319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024515793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059095383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3091555824","doi":"10.5195/dpj.2020.359","title":"Promoting Dialogic Pedagogy through Restricting Technologies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogic Pedagogy A Journal for Studies of Dialogic Education","topic":"Education and Technology Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ambrose University","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogic; Pedagogy; Emerging technologies; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.15924102522245198,"score_gpt":0.47565033429890613,"score_spread":0.31640930907645415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3091555824","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0430033,0.02228785,0.1105482,0.33837557,0.0052511375,0.00014014414,0.00007040093,0.00056751183,0.47975585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9200807,0.0067988476,0.008601174,0.04052467,0.0024763728,0.00040306814,0.000029155597,0.00017775656,0.020908175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98608506,0.008979237,0.0005586735,0.0011252243,0.0024674374,0.00078441063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97784,0.019066725,0.0010359954,0.0009902334,0.00065800466,0.00040889333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009346454,0.0004635765,0.00056307204,0.0010036081,0.0046989475,0.0074549494,0.0017944658,0.0062522916,0.0019845832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018981291,0.0002495214,0.00060523115,0.00054091105,0.028249247,0.009426778,0.00894313,0.0074519343,0.0005780207],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017492337,0.000009250891,0.00011300824,0.00014572116,0.0000034195668,0.00007205057,0.026629105,0.00020788368,0.00081037194,0.9596742,0.0037224924,0.008594918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023268762,0.000051476418,0.00050875905,0.0008820442,0.00001782345,0.00023109271,0.010614927,0.0008357556,0.0027138407,0.37928128,0.6047985,0.00004128983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019452086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023942683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009346454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027769872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036448524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049429357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3096713222","doi":"10.5195/dpj.2020.361","title":"A Student's Response to Dr. Matusov’s article, “A Student’s Right to Freedom of Education”","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogic Pedagogy A Journal for Studies of Dialogic Education","topic":"Religious Education and Schools","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ambrose University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Academic freedom; Sociology; Intellectual freedom; Law; Epistemology; Pedagogy; Higher education; Political science; Philosophy; Censorship; Medicine","score_opus":0.07721505992448116,"score_gpt":0.46872335026880285,"score_spread":0.39150829034432166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3096713222","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002026868,0.0024133392,0.00050651433,0.966285,0.019105379,0.00001791659,0.00003651121,0.00003585094,0.009572672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.057453778,0.0015169136,0.0007664008,0.89708436,0.010976677,0.00009824,0.000030806346,0.000085934254,0.031986877],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99432904,0.002417858,0.00031033406,0.000833856,0.0015337903,0.0005751813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902498,0.0065898327,0.00058774365,0.00025719067,0.0013464999,0.00096895715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043706037,0.000571314,0.0009302204,0.00043685653,0.00848238,0.0058508366,0.0019160231,0.016121522,0.0047020777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021159826,0.00040368122,0.0007838144,0.00062494393,0.0074996348,0.004640936,0.003840137,0.028406138,0.0020216089],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006183807,0.000022891174,0.00033848538,0.00007389256,0.000009065069,0.00029012773,0.006147044,0.000070080605,0.00023520415,0.05590198,0.93088204,0.005967447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019550303,0.00005312175,0.0006480173,0.00021088932,0.000006917076,0.00051412126,0.006760404,0.00023197957,0.0004400778,0.013250975,0.9777951,0.000068874906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004300437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050623417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016121522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035127315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033145028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025486708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3097619702","doi":"10.5195/dpj.2020.308","title":"Dialogic pedagogy in graduate teacher education research advisement: A narrative account of three teacher educators","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogic Pedagogy A Journal for Studies of Dialogic Education","topic":"Teacher Education and Leadership Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Office of International Science and Engineering; University of Toronto","keywords":"Dialogic; Dialogical self; Pedagogy; Narrative; Teacher education; Class (philosophy); Mathematics education; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.4427130274319962,"score_gpt":0.5591341727856175,"score_spread":0.1164211453536213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3097619702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92207706,0.0026626973,0.012875392,0.024065522,0.00034614984,0.0002479381,0.00009616773,0.000103746264,0.03752536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861835,0.0014058105,0.002804749,0.0012371652,0.0000659772,0.00013684854,0.000036658996,0.000049196555,0.008080215],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870331,0.010276663,0.00036540252,0.0005467605,0.0006954154,0.0010827176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98092157,0.012727056,0.0014808214,0.00053207076,0.00092750555,0.0034108544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012378537,0.0006764296,0.0005932689,0.0014842843,0.015846595,0.00953865,0.0021036593,0.0037161876,0.0018860633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018882006,0.00070691475,0.00047494844,0.001199901,0.013865311,0.0059563657,0.007681041,0.007937048,0.0005236998],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019124687,0.000046242767,0.0012777516,0.000047657784,0.0000020551254,0.0013411238,0.98388463,0.000050755207,0.00036841098,0.008183259,0.0008987936,0.0038802067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008044345,0.00005280244,0.001013628,0.00020530763,0.000005435145,0.0016956079,0.9231993,0.00021942827,0.00065680774,0.001751235,0.071166925,0.000025489213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004364754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011625884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015846595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006619797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006036969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065464795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206239052","doi":"10.5195/dpj.2022.497","title":"The University of Students: A place for joint self-education","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogic Pedagogy A Journal for Studies of Dialogic Education","topic":"Educational Innovations and Challenges","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Curiosity; Wonder; Club; Bureaucracy; Civilization; Democracy; Sociology; Pedagogy; Media studies; Aesthetics; Psychology; Political science; Law; Social psychology; Art; Politics","score_opus":0.08159145149971346,"score_gpt":0.39116436975042296,"score_spread":0.3095729182507095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206239052","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0825167,0.0129063865,0.044762168,0.35121295,0.015623566,0.00018825875,0.00007585066,0.0007909785,0.49192315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92427456,0.001465328,0.0059216237,0.01557517,0.002086914,0.00014850369,0.000028275686,0.00023379625,0.05026576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98627025,0.0099762045,0.00028695265,0.0006652148,0.0010870612,0.0017143186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99081755,0.0020456845,0.0006357716,0.0013427401,0.00063893106,0.004519301],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009866258,0.00075595686,0.00075663434,0.0013255904,0.01995613,0.022657402,0.0018878666,0.0068732686,0.010558392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009121412,0.00037626197,0.00081093615,0.001141756,0.04408353,0.0258991,0.029607233,0.015917607,0.002017963],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030232983,0.00008512171,0.00055421324,0.00006399577,0.000007782969,0.00018145534,0.063920975,0.0001281554,0.00016799955,0.8878075,0.025156545,0.021896044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021100457,0.000117941025,0.00040032296,0.0003069652,0.000008354483,0.00030764073,0.067996584,0.00041607057,0.00028555057,0.22861706,0.7014597,0.000062694126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016401034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025921762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022657402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050948467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008639557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052178383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4295949335","doi":"10.5195/dpj.2022.521","title":"Ken Hirschkop’s “new Bakhtin” for the English-speaking students","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogic Pedagogy A Journal for Studies of Dialogic Education","topic":"Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sketch; Key (lock); Literature; Sociology; Linguistics; Classics; Philosophy; History; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.09427817917116343,"score_gpt":0.4648152380201578,"score_spread":0.37053705884899435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4295949335","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013408739,0.94639695,0.0005612137,0.025482617,0.0041829385,0.000009210085,0.0000373737,0.000017222103,0.021971505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.052697223,0.87981164,0.0013132171,0.010963276,0.0046805046,0.000035551526,0.00011300957,0.0000739571,0.050311644],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898475,0.0004084719,0.00006916399,0.00014834461,0.00027435384,0.00011481849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909604,0.00042757523,0.0000719409,0.00002740895,0.00028801922,0.00008908016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012497362,0.00053132983,0.000441687,0.0024753863,0.0019925437,0.003472053,0.0005309813,0.0014646525,0.003015415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002654208,0.00024936016,0.00024705098,0.0023452782,0.0038398304,0.0043849465,0.0012805783,0.002232112,0.001086365],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049710787,0.000025849306,0.0007295041,0.002992103,0.000018748984,0.00031542804,0.016110545,0.00013701787,0.00043754862,0.22568798,0.5493235,0.20417204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019105237,0.0000075807948,0.00074326026,0.001081773,0.000003874011,0.0001658838,0.0021840592,0.000017317563,0.00008056492,0.0055878493,0.9901192,0.0000066814205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023379928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029851247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023379928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046612783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071434015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04648769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}