{"meta":{"query_hash":"22acee32a054","filters":{"venue":"Dialogues in sociology."},"cohort_total":2,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":2,"exported":2,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/22acee32a054","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Dialogues+in+sociology."},"results":[{"id":"W4412707302","doi":"10.1177/29768667251359104","title":"A reflection on Sari Hanafi's ‘societal polarization, academic freedom, and the promise of dialogical sociology’","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogues in sociology.","topic":"Interdisciplinary Studies: Technology, Society, and Humanities","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogical self; Sociology; Epistemology; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0546983276797324,"score_gpt":0.3086495403986438,"score_spread":0.2539512127189114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412707302","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049173543,0.008329099,0.0011806051,0.9689031,0.005490502,0.000013092932,0.00002456049,0.000023159035,0.011118506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2844686,0.0076642795,0.0029270556,0.672568,0.008264175,0.00014101507,0.000031066364,0.0001534557,0.023782345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98319227,0.011487957,0.00033646752,0.001134607,0.0023026727,0.0015460238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9825665,0.0127734,0.0008111663,0.00056703005,0.0015254233,0.0017565511],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015627796,0.001234906,0.00092296384,0.0013762796,0.0156002175,0.013750312,0.0027224298,0.016436309,0.0037632713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01613761,0.0005592022,0.00075868703,0.001498326,0.042470485,0.020435235,0.008645657,0.03297258,0.0009583844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050391434,0.00005996253,0.0004608059,0.00019084387,0.000015952424,0.001272457,0.28382313,0.00009995619,0.00073800737,0.3603341,0.34075394,0.012200504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019154884,0.00003646138,0.0007675557,0.00047834494,0.000006281055,0.00072816986,0.09916521,0.00025851894,0.00046455552,0.06493828,0.83306515,0.00007233792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013288329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021030271,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9843998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008560014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065332367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082648695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415747000","doi":"10.1177/29768667251389068","title":"Intersectionality in interregnum: A conjunctural keyword analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogues in sociology.","topic":"Feminist Theory and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Intersectionality; Salient; Politics; Explanatory power; Mainstream; Power (physics); Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy)","score_opus":0.03869059679813838,"score_gpt":0.38033752570107443,"score_spread":0.341646928902936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415747000","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20889391,0.0023872638,0.47115985,0.0047104293,0.00031536492,0.0010668199,0.0012470176,0.00040126988,0.30981812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88794243,0.00071566744,0.09747094,0.00020208112,0.00006572212,0.00070072635,0.00062920596,0.00024320652,0.012029944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99120355,0.005182563,0.0005343285,0.0009717468,0.0013599918,0.0007478518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895974,0.006758208,0.0008487038,0.0010900352,0.0013255117,0.0003802054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005653372,0.00059332995,0.0010092378,0.0057857516,0.0070972787,0.012256678,0.0025153295,0.001732741,0.01703262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016936606,0.00071384636,0.0014771129,0.010787096,0.011864083,0.020284671,0.011306028,0.0027337954,0.0015811996],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009579511,0.000025772824,0.0025447095,0.00022053634,0.000026162015,0.0004894856,0.046865843,0.00019471528,0.00072682113,0.92744815,0.0012909385,0.020071171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004380398,0.000113331,0.004272579,0.0006411179,0.00017825101,0.0012403127,0.19802812,0.008382086,0.0026506465,0.6641814,0.12018778,0.00008057806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004415575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052060434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01703262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004113098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029755349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056979775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}