{"meta":{"query_hash":"22acee32a054","filters":{"venue":"Dialogues in sociology."},"cohort_total":2,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":2,"exported":2,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/22acee32a054","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Dialogues+in+sociology."},"results":[{"id":"W4412707302","doi":"10.1177/29768667251359104","title":"A reflection on Sari Hanafi's ‘societal polarization, academic freedom, and the promise of dialogical sociology’","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogues in sociology.","topic":"Interdisciplinary Studies: Technology, Society, and Humanities","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogical self; Sociology; Epistemology; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0546983276797324,"score_gpt":0.3086495403986438,"score_spread":0.2539512127189114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412707302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.920787,0.004775059,0.000057196838,0.01073415,0.0025544576,0.00084612024,0.000089087735,0.00020315382,0.059953816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949845,0.00079117774,0.000025893074,0.0014185325,0.00057203503,0.00013315992,0.00005665422,0.000012984157,0.0020050376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983221,0.0003770726,0.0005054941,0.00035597733,0.00009818168,0.00034112018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862665,0.00082255807,0.00019764587,0.00020717239,0.00012818768,0.000017802015],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008055626,0.00023544727,0.0005616994,0.00014703056,0.0009528698,0.000021879323,0.00031776464,0.00053025066,0.000060885577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000359727,0.00016130299,0.00018914849,0.00005657014,0.018868404,0.000092663075,0.00027574797,0.0009563059,0.000010157184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014060376,0.00005825054,0.0019869145,0.000033365577,0.00012663461,8.5375257e-7,0.3137708,0.0000024533622,0.000041190848,0.67852676,0.005230446,0.00008168546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028092768,0.00048719248,0.015771385,0.000106329,0.00012615699,0.0000018883145,0.13913338,0.00008866363,0.00003428067,0.8336409,0.0075135455,0.00028701645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025625766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007334997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17463744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018445571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049971743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98380166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415747000","doi":"10.1177/29768667251389068","title":"Intersectionality in interregnum: A conjunctural keyword analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogues in sociology.","topic":"Feminist Theory and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Intersectionality; Salient; Politics; Explanatory power; Mainstream; Power (physics); Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy)","score_opus":0.03869059679813838,"score_gpt":0.38033752570107443,"score_spread":0.341646928902936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415747000","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87245184,0.0006628743,0.0001970023,0.0037645937,0.0012232146,0.0001450125,0.000009212445,0.000048435475,0.12149779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99767077,0.00009766931,0.00003248762,0.0009206483,0.000075687356,0.000043098924,0.000021729198,0.0000019736506,0.0011359168],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983235,0.0008055782,0.00026299208,0.00025861192,0.00007243063,0.00027689218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912184,0.0006556566,0.000047169084,0.00011753149,0.000034634082,0.000023153641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014022645,0.00009674735,0.0003275193,0.00030173588,0.00021416417,0.000012115371,0.00022460536,0.00017298314,0.00010853399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063066726,0.000091795395,0.00014050024,0.0007938083,0.0018819661,0.000063032894,0.00009623519,0.00024482972,0.000016922297],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057793986,0.000059038244,0.61646515,0.0000056662248,0.00024546304,0.000006400836,0.19942635,0.000018440747,0.0000033573883,0.1817924,0.00085995236,0.001059986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004205481,0.000022759692,0.42273667,0.000023256951,0.00007480722,1.198499e-7,0.12307384,0.000019303272,0.0000069051875,0.44349214,0.009965257,0.00016437886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022367474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052457217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26169974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021476095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008356525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96483296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}