{"meta":{"query_hash":"1916f5497396","filters":{"venue":"Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/1916f5497396","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Digital+Evidence+and+Electronic+Signature+Law+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W2054060709","doi":"10.14296/deeslr.v1i0.1726","title":"Industry Canada releases principles for electronic authentication","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Authentication (law); Electronic signature; Computer science; Computer security; Business; Operating system","score_opus":0.030466543601563496,"score_gpt":0.2936898419724115,"score_spread":0.263223298370848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054060709","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017862272,0.86820227,0.00068361434,0.058664218,0.00032525518,0.0045594187,0.000026669119,0.0002930898,0.049383216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.963318,0.027311638,0.000008566757,0.006253759,0.00020217481,0.000109885244,0.000019400466,0.000020352285,0.0027562093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997847,0.00014705253,0.00031707363,0.00040099054,0.00040018928,0.0008876848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984642,0.00078445213,0.00014009826,0.00025497883,0.00020569492,0.00015054131],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009677902,0.00019916723,0.0003182117,0.000019417948,0.00047176945,0.00019222691,0.00038354995,0.00029119296,0.000084368075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035631019,0.00016224854,0.00008932109,0.0002679471,0.00021344676,0.00072546065,0.00004118407,0.0007878574,0.0000116494875],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016693428,0.000019955422,0.000035850837,0.00053534744,0.000027776592,3.9080047e-7,0.00010856642,0.0000014572927,0.000021497202,0.9689457,0.009067872,0.021218935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007076422,0.00015754941,0.000014595297,0.0019453443,0.000060411367,0.000004594234,0.000034957688,0.00006357373,0.00009685301,0.008910229,0.9884054,0.00023569485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036976095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29804388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9793376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048825965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021151982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96943676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2205278350","doi":"10.14296/deeslr.v12i0.2212","title":"Case Comment on Laushway v Messervey, 2014 NSCA 7: ‘Old evidence law dogs, new technology tricks’","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review","topic":"Digital and Cyber Forensics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Plaintiff; Metadata; Appeal; Law; High Court; Political science; Relevance (law); Common law; Supreme court; History; Computer science; World Wide Web; Archaeology","score_opus":0.035991239226805444,"score_gpt":0.27639191738807206,"score_spread":0.24040067816126662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2205278350","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009242413,0.91408795,0.0027013964,0.0698142,0.00037166983,0.001270232,0.000013381504,0.00056707906,0.010249837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8997753,0.05178391,0.000313647,0.047015972,0.00013664705,0.00007137318,0.000014818183,0.000036919966,0.00085141096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967015,0.00008871504,0.00058289047,0.0009917348,0.0006637127,0.000971491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973777,0.00040540178,0.00024422922,0.001219787,0.00024799776,0.00050490844],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007703985,0.0005244661,0.0007389492,0.00009188674,0.0001775062,0.00089020474,0.0013981279,0.0002387717,0.000010780811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037115166,0.00039952292,0.00019567652,0.0010805007,0.00025600902,0.0046552094,0.0006050787,0.00076646544,0.00024701012],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017941664,0.00008085568,0.000023187655,0.00029895362,0.000035413166,0.0004561245,0.000039948307,0.0000020728999,0.000003512756,0.8138085,0.073160484,0.11207301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003645095,0.001461179,0.0000020035004,0.008256132,0.000069227826,0.0029983092,0.0000113811975,0.000052485233,0.0003225326,0.08735933,0.8984408,0.00066212827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033344366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019937336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89885104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020941267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042041752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230168034","doi":"10.14296/deeslr.v7i0.1919","title":"Book Report","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review","topic":"Digital and Traditional Archives Management","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cape Town; Dalhousie University; National University of Singapore; University of Pennsylvania; University of Canterbury; U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.016057050332712722,"score_gpt":0.22677996182046026,"score_spread":0.21072291148774752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230168034","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000092068134,0.33134025,0.0000388803,0.0054140775,0.00008732142,0.00029619408,0.000008879585,0.00008428772,0.662638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8763877,0.052899778,0.0000040409864,0.043507293,0.00042625883,0.000057297853,0.000111118214,0.00002056602,0.026585916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988878,0.000019417092,0.0002548613,0.00030291142,0.00022017623,0.00031486782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945295,0.00013196707,0.00008883952,0.0002049202,0.000043998694,0.00007732599],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001772594,0.00017216476,0.0002476856,0.000021480802,0.00015509999,0.0003954713,0.00015842335,0.000013349217,0.00030763127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000071983945,0.0001256505,0.00011356692,0.000032855558,0.00021842768,0.0016273519,0.000058134214,0.00017862156,0.00014542261],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003576545,0.000027228256,0.0000014198031,0.0005920374,0.00002637879,0.000013635358,0.000036396214,1.3751153e-7,5.0224014e-7,0.9124552,0.05089226,0.035951223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004293379,0.00013436102,0.000020406062,0.0022417759,0.00003801748,0.000057005163,0.0000032162134,0.000004224305,0.0000021987166,0.07119444,0.926096,0.00016537291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010321076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001252976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8762957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017422517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024267658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5123879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}