{"meta":{"query_hash":"a1070ab1e44b","filters":{"venue":"Discourse Processes"},"cohort_total":30,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":30,"exported":30,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/a1070ab1e44b","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Discourse+Processes"},"results":[{"id":"W1968673961","doi":"10.1080/0163853x.2012.687863","title":"Are There Necessary Conditions for Inducing a Sense of Sarcastic Irony?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":155,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Irony; Computer science; Psychology; Linguistics; Communication; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06779163403053766,"score_gpt":0.40178449198492905,"score_spread":0.3339928579543914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968673961","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9702251,0.001457938,0.004664455,0.0006658402,0.0018223366,0.0003565112,0.00022841616,0.000097706055,0.020481694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99727225,0.000012590575,0.00010441259,0.00041610014,0.00034733684,0.00018449844,0.000031449017,0.000029106763,0.001602234],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902225,0.000050309653,0.0002569522,0.00022395131,0.000101332014,0.00034522355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896324,0.00019246795,0.00032672638,0.00025536088,0.00015898903,0.00010320372],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015874712,0.00014405357,0.00022616856,0.0001376682,0.00010477261,0.000010840087,0.00009234902,0.0001206846,0.0020653573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002121702,0.00012749144,0.0000750881,0.00026657595,0.0002384638,0.00017570535,0.00001796301,0.000120713965,0.00018688572],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027415655,0.012610165,0.293886,0.004138307,0.0023392737,0.00011365056,0.06577004,0.00015178708,0.013994493,0.11440368,0.42730123,0.062549815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008281348,0.0008981175,0.6814138,0.00068623794,0.0007932083,0.0010659925,0.21291098,0.00005508637,0.006795747,0.017720388,0.06756945,0.0018096117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009892964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023886163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38752782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012352456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003183809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988469},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969127682","doi":"10.1080/01638530903420960","title":"The Role of Prior Knowledge in Learning From Analogies in Science Texts","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Waterloo","keywords":"Analogy; Domain (mathematical analysis); Domain knowledge; Computer science; Natural language processing; Sentence; Artificial intelligence; Control (management); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive science; Linguistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02201854721302503,"score_gpt":0.37077587109824534,"score_spread":0.3487573238852203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969127682","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94540805,0.004935275,0.0000014212774,0.00037811798,0.0002854258,0.00007558461,0.0000022039292,0.000014643999,0.048899297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994098,0.00008531458,0.0000546558,0.000004366314,0.00005548971,0.000046580157,0.0000027617423,0.0000052818045,0.0003357726],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992251,0.000031080708,0.00018847677,0.00021152875,0.000104801526,0.00023905688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991478,0.00046564476,0.00009117063,0.00016734264,0.000105757965,0.000022283353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003634642,0.00007738512,0.00011065332,0.00009468422,0.0001367222,0.000055520373,0.00043779344,0.00004675141,0.00007720359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058832293,0.000051573865,0.000014693966,0.00055777695,0.000753202,0.00015483018,0.000059953294,0.00025550145,0.000022872195],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047336853,0.00034248616,0.8859449,0.000035072993,0.000009795256,0.000002588477,0.01865741,0.00006293077,0.0056610648,0.056484345,0.000060259776,0.032691795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013667099,0.00002934291,0.8512877,0.000039178853,0.0000032176374,0.000001482409,0.12379514,0.00002121472,0.0026962636,0.019889688,0.0020088968,0.000091171074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010598138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008328015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10513773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013292883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046318167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46472278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984066794","doi":"10.1080/0163853x.2013.778168","title":"Influence of Role-Switching on Phonetic Convergence in Conversation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Acadia University","keywords":"Conversation; Dominance (genetics); Accommodation; Psychology; Convergence (economics); Speech recognition; Contrast (vision); Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Communication; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.016229724669636264,"score_gpt":0.33886180774066954,"score_spread":0.3226320830710333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984066794","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99657995,0.0004102988,0.000030922725,0.0005143503,0.00009014746,0.0002662519,0.00000453908,0.000015793434,0.0020877465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994749,0.00006756786,0.000018175684,0.00011134081,0.000019624182,0.00012412423,0.0000043024775,0.000011356012,0.00016862684],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901843,0.000060058825,0.00023201996,0.0002488295,0.00016592574,0.0002747574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930155,0.00016535139,0.00009847025,0.00022718713,0.00015245189,0.000055004974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014131017,0.00010774341,0.00015990515,0.0001559456,0.0000279148,0.00001466959,0.0002505008,0.00008296371,0.0008752417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014938664,0.00009641963,0.000017905324,0.00034793126,0.00014104242,0.00013643199,0.00003436671,0.00020376979,0.0006442111],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047789759,0.0017760377,0.6806734,0.00068287895,0.0001432888,0.00003421019,0.14296414,0.0051397616,0.14414416,0.004341361,0.0008888174,0.018734053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007519448,0.00023793339,0.96026236,0.00013467431,0.000008350412,0.000004831867,0.0058830143,0.00036102234,0.024740977,0.0073762387,0.000042579628,0.00019609285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018013308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000105761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27958894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014016211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001021782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9583283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984587708","doi":"10.1207/s15326950dp3303_1","title":"Does Sarcasm Always Sting? Investigating the Impact of Ironic Insults and Ironic Compliments","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":165,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sarcasm; Irony; Insult; Politeness; Psychology; Criticism; Perception; Interpretation (philosophy); Expression (computer science); Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Literature; Neuroscience; Art","score_opus":0.03872768548491306,"score_gpt":0.34144804522292443,"score_spread":0.30272035973801137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984587708","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.985139,0.0065244455,0.000025802534,0.00026415393,0.00011410676,0.00024307553,0.000058292993,0.00004454181,0.0075865975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990256,0.00019427529,0.000045463035,0.00010095929,0.000115624985,0.00004618883,0.000019519663,0.000022973067,0.00042942812],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988718,0.00008740283,0.0002607979,0.00028770088,0.00017655754,0.00031576646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917644,0.00017561986,0.00023000716,0.00025285166,0.00008928177,0.00007578807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016717831,0.00018906966,0.00020991545,0.000059181275,0.00017329406,0.000049064573,0.00019695506,0.0000627822,0.0006583254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017794046,0.000091044545,0.00005842681,0.00025463646,0.00034225045,0.00016123746,0.0000527896,0.00017052486,0.00004609566],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024699356,0.004494987,0.43475413,0.002466297,0.0023652355,0.00009139604,0.302535,0.00015269732,0.013093576,0.0060744826,0.007221075,0.22650412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011123948,0.0024487083,0.75584674,0.0019597386,0.0013880341,0.00032467963,0.15178867,0.0020958302,0.017487658,0.05236718,0.00067125924,0.0024975822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040191744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006040066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32109258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021586508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004642576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7208201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989804978","doi":"10.1207/s15326950dp4201_3","title":"Metaphor Production in Online Conversation: Gender and Friendship Status","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Digital Communication and Language","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Metaphor; Conversation; Friendship; Psychology; Literal and figurative language; Production (economics); Social psychology; Linguistics; Communication","score_opus":0.025903370425685777,"score_gpt":0.2893522554477257,"score_spread":0.2634488850220399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989804978","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92017746,0.007729385,0.007008258,0.0049449336,0.00014032486,0.00033643987,0.000018219558,0.00025933882,0.05938563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967228,0.000072766714,0.0028609228,0.00010652323,0.000023797551,0.000013184626,0.00003749025,0.0000046432297,0.00015783662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935776,0.000023367355,0.00013136283,0.00021446454,0.00012942214,0.00014359763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995474,0.000027116903,0.00005321593,0.0002674898,0.00007108953,0.000033640248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000923598,0.000076719,0.00007780968,0.000089084344,0.000038335962,0.00013943561,0.00021835472,0.000019761952,0.000008695523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007470337,0.00006677844,0.000010201198,0.0004119536,0.00005676508,0.00088989286,0.00007947414,0.00006242083,0.000005370309],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007442603,0.003494637,0.10273875,0.0010645322,0.00006948219,0.00005693279,0.0287951,0.00077315693,0.0013107837,0.7347963,0.0014643345,0.12536158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038461506,0.00026303716,0.6712222,0.00028834623,0.000079661615,0.00014087808,0.048618395,0.007408169,0.0324349,0.15908204,0.07422683,0.0023893837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000072698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029397698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57571423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014724415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000872634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27231458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994528807","doi":"10.1080/0163853x.2013.766123","title":"Processes of Discourse Integration: Evidence From Event-Related Brain Potentials","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Indeterminate; N400; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Linguistics; Situational ethics; Discourse analysis; Event (particle physics); Underspecification; Natural language processing; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Event-related potential; Social psychology; Philosophy; Mathematics; History","score_opus":0.03403277695470193,"score_gpt":0.33990133493217956,"score_spread":0.30586855797747764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994528807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98895127,0.00239524,0.00060929696,0.006590013,0.00030092674,0.0005760994,0.00008256646,0.00014049328,0.00035407755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99714124,0.00036864207,0.00019082364,0.00075900066,0.00014463166,0.00010216701,0.00003332652,0.00003180877,0.0012283374],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977205,0.0001843788,0.0006003904,0.00073270046,0.00037749953,0.00038456297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973999,0.0012438406,0.0004482003,0.00041529938,0.00037823524,0.00011451005],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017639961,0.00031064064,0.00039134407,0.0001231784,0.00016197562,0.00012302145,0.00069989637,0.00013238,0.0010572692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007979779,0.0002244082,0.000088496796,0.00076180254,0.000672475,0.0013641675,0.00012135914,0.00023220512,0.00020397882],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047540874,0.0003866658,0.0009147075,0.0003549932,0.000024492878,0.00010940794,0.005577104,0.000037232912,0.9846824,0.00013833835,0.0017062597,0.0060208957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032922783,0.00015619151,0.0003519913,0.0008114472,0.00006375564,0.00007109155,0.003276271,0.00005150628,0.98882747,0.0056591895,0.00006066928,0.00034117838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003202814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000101356796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008189975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012616951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044923482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998559},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020560311","doi":"10.1080/0163853x.2012.664759","title":"Japanese Negotiation Through Emerging Final Particles in Everyday Talk","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Computer science; Conversation analysis; Linguistics; Psychology; Sociology; Communication; Conversation; Social science","score_opus":0.0869238224511804,"score_gpt":0.33999512743218663,"score_spread":0.2530713049810062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020560311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93804026,0.0056720967,0.00003087852,0.0016155718,0.00027692667,0.0001906846,0.000019610416,0.00013097173,0.054023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99728745,0.00014663601,0.00011760254,0.000185921,0.000513762,0.00009884382,0.000053005057,0.000027360416,0.0015694018],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874455,0.00007465435,0.00030744256,0.00018194261,0.00025201257,0.00043939054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992262,0.00011073651,0.00015359318,0.00032271355,0.00012822478,0.00005854194],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021606969,0.0001931403,0.00018996389,0.00008260871,0.00026625692,0.00025617666,0.00029526904,0.000038449398,0.0012419387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013592782,0.00015837794,0.000044886365,0.00014771638,0.00028135473,0.0027689135,0.00007092057,0.0001506522,0.00013855819],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004393824,0.0008583139,0.008854315,0.00033598562,0.000051264757,0.000006754257,0.79862183,0.00012262278,0.00022877473,0.18669702,0.0016337442,0.0025454431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095840683,0.000059755534,0.0060226717,0.0003017048,0.00010307206,0.000015265985,0.9332455,0.00013664078,0.0031036476,0.010217834,0.044985797,0.0008497369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006583175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031373226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17647919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032912074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009605353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021948023","doi":"10.1080/0163853x.2012.665988","title":"Clausal Continuations in Japanese","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Linguistics; Natural language processing","score_opus":0.05843316519508333,"score_gpt":0.3328303474858093,"score_spread":0.27439718229072596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021948023","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59291303,0.0046438454,0.000014461223,0.0017387528,0.00031108002,0.0002344503,0.000044337947,0.00014597968,0.39995405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99236333,0.00006600208,0.000059211638,0.00016320654,0.0005023551,0.0001242244,0.00006788006,0.000022546928,0.0066312584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990336,0.00005391592,0.00024428562,0.00013505154,0.00018538599,0.00034779968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992312,0.00012516348,0.000100737976,0.0003175621,0.0001529388,0.00007239049],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020622463,0.00015179584,0.00016691392,0.00012024299,0.00019518982,0.00022480715,0.00030199904,0.000035055164,0.0019046394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014220244,0.00012262513,0.00003368479,0.00011133818,0.00035768823,0.0013174969,0.000056302884,0.00014863451,0.00028690443],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017416609,0.0007331216,0.009648617,0.00014487629,0.00003509672,0.0000027415572,0.41549712,0.000009792369,0.000054164462,0.56897086,0.0035251065,0.0013610914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086240197,0.000046414843,0.006555378,0.00019856311,0.00008173658,0.000009786361,0.8532737,0.000020929605,0.0004430703,0.0052618925,0.13251387,0.0007322651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035227786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051113535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56370896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021871352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011535367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99900776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023315320","doi":"10.1080/01638530903347635","title":"How Do Children Respond to Verbal Irony in Face-to-Face Communication? The Development of Mode Adoption Across Middle Childhood","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of Guelph","keywords":"Irony; Comprehension; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Face (sociological concept); Literal and figurative language; Linguistics; Developmental psychology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02036686975759433,"score_gpt":0.33215658542216875,"score_spread":0.3117897156645744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023315320","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99461514,0.0005968035,0.0009834234,0.0016451842,0.00012998682,0.00065885304,0.000095102245,0.00003415963,0.0012413224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99742705,0.000015144408,0.001309812,0.00015584404,0.000060094506,0.00028121984,0.0000999642,0.00002416908,0.00062671455],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987779,0.00009092512,0.0002687304,0.00031250043,0.00024220292,0.00030771343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898916,0.00007328673,0.00012968176,0.0005984839,0.00012898575,0.000080393176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003927415,0.00017412209,0.00018589142,0.000093254916,0.0001924182,0.000100078854,0.0006107195,0.000103674065,0.00007646777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016324136,0.00012886242,0.000034783014,0.0004841024,0.00009552987,0.00018655317,0.00013234056,0.0002818139,0.00008551917],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005985135,0.0021536448,0.019031335,0.000118898846,0.00018702343,0.0000030595343,0.85628533,0.00017136818,0.0047888383,0.0023656846,0.0005022643,0.113794014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017908759,0.0001647913,0.76000994,0.00025451207,0.0000633794,0.000021575686,0.21178313,0.000006326354,0.02235978,0.0011561349,0.0017724251,0.0006171362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000074855925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025368617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7409786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020252219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013227413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5254857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036304588","doi":"10.1080/0163853x.2005.9651679","title":"Representing Complex Narrative Goal Structures: Competing Memory-Based and Situational Influences","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Situational ethics; Narrative; Contradiction; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Sentence; Psychology; Natural language processing; Cognitive science; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.032155510705301926,"score_gpt":0.3684931890225077,"score_spread":0.3363376783172058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036304588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9865523,0.00054625934,0.00039928206,0.0018861871,0.00011318796,0.00015514997,0.000013589261,0.00007774154,0.010256316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99304616,0.0000030401059,0.0053948546,0.00045741847,0.0002510674,0.000044844423,0.00006785333,0.000013984943,0.00072077283],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987696,0.000068960464,0.00028546347,0.00037864104,0.0002377545,0.00025961106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991975,0.00026384328,0.00017062927,0.00013744137,0.0001579369,0.000072682924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000203543,0.00016757404,0.00017710967,0.00009343088,0.00031498933,0.0001249973,0.00014640889,0.000048211572,0.0007671028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019111927,0.00014010731,0.000023984008,0.00018365936,0.00018960657,0.00022164786,0.000033701333,0.00012930385,0.000028564604],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003630474,0.0005800427,0.4007664,0.0007655771,0.00044662872,0.000052639287,0.48070243,0.0059221527,0.0025922935,0.014326043,0.006105158,0.08737759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037574454,0.00014572193,0.76964056,0.00064941874,0.000103300976,0.00012589645,0.18959887,0.002731581,0.0048956666,0.0036714291,0.023141759,0.0015383408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000044168144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000040783387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36887416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015189392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013746745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8399238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040555246","doi":"10.1080/0163853x.2010.532757","title":"When Sarcasm Stings","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Sarcasm; Aggression; Psychology; Perspective (graphical); Negativity effect; Social psychology; Argument (complex analysis); Statement (logic); Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Irony; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04890501108375642,"score_gpt":0.3259629704623055,"score_spread":0.27705795937854905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040555246","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3585035,0.0023442619,0.0007833741,0.00016640735,0.0006898227,0.00019165207,0.000023251012,0.00021105069,0.6370867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906145,0.000019040412,0.000469514,0.00041983975,0.00030503917,0.00008568708,0.000022713877,0.000026952788,0.008036734],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911,0.00003495533,0.00015475079,0.0002846971,0.00013550092,0.0002801239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942225,0.000034206245,0.00008627245,0.00022035315,0.00016440537,0.00007251453],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011665134,0.0001373272,0.00013534389,0.0000676152,0.00007635826,0.000025972184,0.00019517081,0.000070465525,0.0077518537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016778451,0.00011004291,0.000042175147,0.00015170302,0.00009940022,0.00013019818,0.0000264606,0.00010900544,0.0011306764],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008523689,0.0040616672,0.044145804,0.0010769728,0.00073725404,0.00058313867,0.44184422,2.955911e-7,0.0009977556,0.14285643,0.10841625,0.25442785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006277117,0.0013701391,0.08235465,0.0006828332,0.0014588819,0.00032691416,0.28750184,0.000008759199,0.06068454,0.41993475,0.1358233,0.003576274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027503414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007485298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.632111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006540644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005306304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077448887","doi":"10.1080/0163853x.2012.654760","title":"Turn-Continuation by Self and by Other","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Continuation; Variety (cybernetics); Computer science; Point (geometry); Turn-taking; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Programming language; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021068834336324612,"score_gpt":0.28264676891304935,"score_spread":0.26157793457672474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077448887","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6674417,0.04935494,0.00015568158,0.0034145473,0.0002997296,0.00039791435,0.00036331423,0.0004141,0.278158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897555,0.00023623928,0.000068987014,0.00033260096,0.00029975057,0.000061435254,0.00009147397,0.000028872846,0.00912513],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923414,0.000039735412,0.00016378667,0.00014408844,0.00016454994,0.00025370205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941456,0.000064890955,0.000118880285,0.00021914681,0.00010802512,0.000074468015],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014725848,0.0001571982,0.00013622957,0.000036211568,0.00024327346,0.00034221917,0.00018129862,0.00003659311,0.0009911744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036997786,0.00012118823,0.000021155369,0.000039966337,0.00024894558,0.0011848897,0.000040755574,0.00009209949,0.00007714774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029494606,0.001236367,0.008437994,0.00046330856,0.00021180448,6.1212427e-7,0.39648473,5.4063077e-7,0.001238509,0.26111236,0.32271203,0.008072262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003945666,0.00003326516,0.00016741313,0.000056711327,0.000092414426,0.0000034456104,0.09911596,0.000007632762,0.0032014104,0.0014158193,0.89509875,0.0004126419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001429314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022654835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5723867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011436517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040053455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077670376","doi":"10.1080/01638530902959570","title":"Readers' Knowledge of Popular Genre","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Media Influence and Health","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Romance; Theme (computing); Fantasy; Reading (process); Narrative; Plot (graphics); Literature; Feeling; Psychology; Linguistics; Computer science; Art; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.059103042047260475,"score_gpt":0.3386924360607816,"score_spread":0.2795893940135211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077670376","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7326778,0.01302077,0.00004057316,0.0056534433,0.0005585295,0.00039057975,0.000058425117,0.00015787709,0.24744198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994312,0.00019452449,0.00005097807,0.00044995509,0.0005137637,0.000009156333,0.00001730502,0.000008138849,0.0044442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993293,0.000011286832,0.00020769952,0.00013805172,0.000108720385,0.00020492067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994843,0.000015585201,0.00008877583,0.00014419101,0.00019977012,0.00006736255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008452097,0.000102493934,0.00017665557,0.0000704989,0.00013317232,0.000036764755,0.00015091001,0.000028903329,0.00056418777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006687112,0.00007860195,0.000035505796,0.000054836677,0.0001626524,0.0002498225,0.000008232541,0.00007677839,0.000098720346],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047795176,0.0007718415,0.0012958093,0.001756258,0.000033189604,0.000008237437,0.44662142,0.0000038429957,0.00016216835,0.49609393,0.01682116,0.036384355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010948228,0.0010380939,0.0021466806,0.0011007852,0.00017404648,0.000009124347,0.26420918,0.000026938162,0.0045152926,0.04113794,0.6836208,0.00092629483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005354424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003934155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6667996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007860729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001993211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61774606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077773484","doi":"10.1080/0163853x.2014.883730","title":"Effect of Dialogue on Demonstrations: Direct Quotations, Facial Portrayals, Hand Gestures, and Figurative References","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Hearing Impairment and Communication","field":"Psychology","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Gesture; Literal and figurative language; Face (sociological concept); Linguistics; Referent; Psychology; Nonverbal communication; Class (philosophy); Computer science; Communication; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021254705367894755,"score_gpt":0.35506398905015485,"score_spread":0.3338092836822601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077773484","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9608852,0.00086498616,0.00016694503,0.0005413549,0.00009517407,0.00028340772,0.00002564467,0.000040788273,0.03709647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99918306,0.00009862285,0.000058442754,0.000033599288,0.000053970154,0.00013492734,0.00007972694,0.000008635759,0.0003490081],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903107,0.00031181486,0.00019705045,0.00019586638,0.00012492218,0.0001393023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882805,0.0007150637,0.00013130959,0.00021309456,0.00006749034,0.000044995282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038397333,0.0001278758,0.00019429864,0.00007454069,0.00018086832,0.000048611153,0.00012465467,0.00007059542,0.00003968244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004914036,0.00009622015,0.000023293545,0.00013795082,0.00020861407,0.00011761081,0.000015278783,0.00010740281,0.000017205364],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015236769,0.0017891466,0.27563706,0.001203353,0.00047543453,0.000006581122,0.04450914,0.00007316634,0.0026089987,0.054127015,0.0056227865,0.61242366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0064276704,0.014892978,0.8587554,0.0015595114,0.00075204426,0.00003231053,0.00917477,0.00022031816,0.07888367,0.00948181,0.018114569,0.0017049323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013778704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019877919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6107187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005971734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054105083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3923744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080264995","doi":"10.1080/01638530902959901","title":"Understanding Verbal Irony: Clues From Interpretation of Direct and Indirect Ironic Remarks","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Irony; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Perception; Interpretation (philosophy); Counterfactual thinking; Statement (logic); Face (sociological concept); Linguistics; Social psychology; Sarcasm; Pragmatics; Indirect speech; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.03040161658876743,"score_gpt":0.315692277819841,"score_spread":0.28529066123107355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080264995","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9540844,0.0021238206,0.002248307,0.00008461399,0.00054130144,0.0001402014,0.000067040884,0.00006040075,0.040649902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99924064,0.00011750064,0.00012536555,0.000050241742,0.0001367217,0.000026802756,0.00008270526,0.00002068428,0.00019934235],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991296,0.00005907156,0.00019542294,0.00029488723,0.00014360058,0.00017743689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993642,0.00020876036,0.0001510644,0.00017339371,0.00005180865,0.00005074889],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016017258,0.00013949715,0.00021653976,0.000094958355,0.00007005538,0.000041316605,0.000109320856,0.000114632705,0.0005591411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015639266,0.00011789814,0.000038395276,0.00015408837,0.00018674716,0.00021263846,0.000027032658,0.00017625341,0.000015707332],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004308008,0.0029832036,0.15432157,0.0024404542,0.0025580584,0.00016011606,0.44258684,0.000017312339,0.090722956,0.040459625,0.005192077,0.25424978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010271788,0.0016192477,0.187559,0.0022889213,0.003276717,0.00013295266,0.39707416,0.0009876719,0.16663924,0.22461487,0.001912758,0.0036226774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021441467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010412189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25062713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018596276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057615965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6122203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092026556","doi":"10.1080/0163853x.2015.1029858","title":"Phantom Recollection of Bridging and Elaborative Inferences","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Recall; Psychology; Inference; Cognitive psychology; Bridging (networking); Perception; Recall test; Free recall; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08818690078360042,"score_gpt":0.35222074027126843,"score_spread":0.264033839487668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092026556","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98817825,0.0007997038,0.00042041927,0.000276154,0.00012695027,0.00012589483,0.000013506258,0.000044070668,0.010015063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989709,0.0004384328,0.0001278746,0.00009680592,0.00005578141,0.000019738474,0.0000010191098,0.0000069850507,0.00028242066],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990953,0.00004046491,0.0001885283,0.00027935716,0.00024345527,0.00015287813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999279,0.00010483382,0.00017475004,0.00008576021,0.00026917283,0.000086465465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015107093,0.00011100662,0.00016087017,0.000089061854,0.00010353948,0.00008062631,0.00013874352,0.00003171965,0.000024370887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019947756,0.00008492612,0.00001129803,0.00073283026,0.00025686627,0.0008533312,0.000040219176,0.00006645091,0.0000064277056],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014374853,0.0019570857,0.19504341,0.006870715,0.00011377806,0.00007889367,0.08341314,0.001353244,0.4811973,0.020257955,0.007295604,0.2009814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040407732,0.00028826811,0.0006887484,0.00015418968,0.000020295924,0.000023318553,0.0067391703,0.0004705098,0.9838432,0.0062161586,0.00093305577,0.00021899086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035825233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000035739526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5026459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008439779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040950743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34631866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145480817","doi":"10.1080/01638530802629141","title":"Noticing and Revising Discrepancies as Texts Unfold","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Institute of Education Sciences; University of Minnesota; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Narrative; Comprehension; Notice; Trait; Psychology; Character (mathematics); Linguistics; Reading comprehension; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Reading (process); Philosophy","score_opus":0.01638062217684927,"score_gpt":0.352023122038283,"score_spread":0.33564249986143374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145480817","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.914163,0.0063441,0.00028004838,0.003722591,0.00020627554,0.00015033454,0.0000030671235,0.0001255503,0.07500507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913285,0.000090355235,0.0005223771,0.00068411924,0.00012468312,0.000010990476,0.000007828973,0.000013297081,0.0072178836],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900883,0.000023966666,0.00021033656,0.0003201276,0.00014069004,0.0002960337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995141,0.00007752713,0.000081660815,0.00017908284,0.00006164088,0.000085976084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014559721,0.00015905984,0.00018740435,0.00008103042,0.00014648649,0.00013610693,0.00010780737,0.00004666943,0.0001377236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001585119,0.00012543549,0.000022885673,0.00020797398,0.000065335145,0.00022298694,0.000019364517,0.00009975546,0.000104166866],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003433183,0.0007300416,0.034100365,0.0007965159,0.00020975957,0.0003059047,0.11437875,0.000017924573,0.0014493694,0.08479728,0.008925429,0.75394535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004053862,0.0013740653,0.58373547,0.0066221426,0.0005349171,0.0011000079,0.057859655,0.000079403515,0.013317507,0.046174686,0.2812086,0.0039396607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000043045835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005364098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75000566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013894225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000064514345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5115111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2603775804","doi":"10.1080/0163853x.2017.1289794","title":"Can Differences in Word Frequency Explain Why Narrative Fiction Is a Better Predictor of Verbal Ability than Nonfiction?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Narrative; Reading (process); Linguistics; Psychology; Word lists by frequency; Word (group theory); Nonverbal communication; Communication; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027240325607796136,"score_gpt":0.327350322701455,"score_spread":0.3001099970936588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2603775804","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9890256,0.00015238447,0.000085628744,0.0029820842,0.00065403,0.00024660933,0.00009182821,0.000032406275,0.006729425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99875224,0.000018935356,0.000109148896,0.000105414685,0.000121369936,0.00021744058,0.00002340143,0.000012729535,0.00063932163],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986463,0.000077301,0.0003633322,0.00042741187,0.00022142807,0.0002642115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989662,0.00007409465,0.00030750016,0.00045118478,0.00013805373,0.00006296276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001950086,0.00019061753,0.00028023522,0.00010809471,0.00023885016,0.00008952613,0.00033676717,0.00010159411,0.0005557232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013826833,0.00015405506,0.000046177873,0.00012854821,0.00024353688,0.00033480444,0.00003402129,0.00017456437,0.0000089014175],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008837862,0.0003221953,0.8479233,0.00012117212,0.00006291189,0.000006253055,0.1466593,3.4333837e-7,0.000112229434,0.00017250906,0.0015681842,0.0029632514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005913474,0.000104854356,0.9756664,0.00027954808,0.00001961562,0.00000360477,0.019604696,0.000008258768,0.0008765791,0.0022747973,0.00035986927,0.00021045556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018032027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009984274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12774311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051454732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014279284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6282183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765136063","doi":"10.1080/0163853x.2017.1381059","title":"Being Sad Is Not Always Bad: The Influence of Affect on Expository Text Comprehension","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Psychology; Comprehension; Valence (chemistry); Reading comprehension; Mood; Affect (linguistics); Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Reading (process); Linguistics; Communication","score_opus":0.04973546694126523,"score_gpt":0.3868730904584946,"score_spread":0.33713762351722937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765136063","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9653246,0.00048378835,0.0000053510935,0.0038901751,0.00040930355,0.0001549682,0.000012370563,0.000025180527,0.029694293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983069,0.00007736256,0.000024803996,0.0004442876,0.00017006531,0.00005157391,0.0000036422439,0.000012181678,0.00090921065],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991553,0.000042844622,0.00016999309,0.0002451569,0.00018724026,0.00019948845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998624,0.0003529949,0.00024482072,0.00061058445,0.00013509975,0.000032470743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001235738,0.00013842313,0.00016430418,0.000029704615,0.0005490846,0.00009533495,0.0005971861,0.00006615619,0.00010949115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001575804,0.00008792367,0.000048866616,0.000049764854,0.00043830427,0.00018478712,0.00007310511,0.00013191874,0.000091835485],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014655557,0.002459672,0.59290546,0.0022025355,0.0007318703,0.00006720352,0.07201891,0.0018765352,0.022773009,0.20273168,0.07656537,0.024202215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020790142,0.00016875014,0.98147035,0.00023060023,0.0000320947,0.0000081475055,0.00652311,0.000002570066,0.0072600213,0.001751929,0.0021894036,0.00015515221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036188096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031531945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38856488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011680932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009539251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42231706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921593027","doi":"10.1080/0163853x.2019.1581588","title":"Irony, Prosody, and Social Impressions of Affective Stance","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Prosody; Irony; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Social psychology; Computer science; Speech recognition","score_opus":0.012962234253737782,"score_gpt":0.3263103384720599,"score_spread":0.31334810421832215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921593027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9694455,0.0019150239,0.00016153215,0.00015515657,0.00019354039,0.00030254992,0.0000728448,0.000033048622,0.027720774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99781334,0.000026674727,0.000033356147,0.00006551206,0.00009489075,0.000070611735,0.000019728825,0.000014796572,0.0018610687],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932075,0.000042837277,0.000113835624,0.00023309757,0.00012218594,0.00016732267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958086,0.000063715364,0.00011022275,0.00011118072,0.00010710168,0.000026907495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007643332,0.00010318747,0.00017060047,0.000042784483,0.00006152685,0.000014952756,0.00008249579,0.00006892081,0.00053783105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030809144,0.000080132435,0.000026831998,0.00014001703,0.00011947852,0.00013690042,0.000027964348,0.0000898805,0.000048942573],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002370914,0.004737458,0.17550258,0.007983516,0.0011406593,0.00006593214,0.33373535,0.0000042296733,0.08964536,0.124584116,0.010927844,0.24930203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012081255,0.0019208684,0.38304237,0.0011393928,0.0010343846,0.00008476301,0.4190596,0.000030122234,0.124360405,0.04894794,0.0059134015,0.0023855078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000390362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003819178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24691653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000059891936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005865452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5888873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940027735","doi":"10.1080/0163853x.2019.1598167","title":"Challenges in Processes of Validation and Comprehension","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Comprehension; Misinformation; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Automaticity; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Variety (cybernetics); Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Cognition","score_opus":0.057065423785164396,"score_gpt":0.3557213650803197,"score_spread":0.2986559412951553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2940027735","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97137463,0.009892704,0.000012132501,0.00039138112,0.00012483411,0.00017958102,0.0000027092015,0.000022121918,0.017999912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980904,0.0011070957,0.00012504355,0.000017635139,0.000017664865,0.000030690004,0.000012454643,0.000010632392,0.00058841414],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992734,0.00002844319,0.0001962008,0.00025412152,0.000112251124,0.00013557893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995157,0.00011949879,0.00009577783,0.000131982,0.00011156984,0.000025488947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012575036,0.00009665133,0.00017328565,0.000116130854,0.0000146064485,0.000013445125,0.00007799003,0.000047410675,0.000095709234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005718251,0.000079713034,0.000008497491,0.00019684804,0.000037722533,0.00015625477,0.000022850398,0.000057421326,0.0000401581],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037006117,0.0013086384,0.66530395,0.011687274,0.00010968269,0.000013245623,0.120095626,0.00006896475,0.0018834248,0.009667453,0.00038183166,0.18910983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037641274,0.00059070834,0.87335,0.003719188,0.000062185456,0.0000825998,0.062119644,0.000038783477,0.034102604,0.004925067,0.016213087,0.0010320094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020648806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021434864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20804603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006472442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000675297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32506034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946907340","doi":"10.1080/0163853x.2019.1609742","title":"Distraction and Temporal Order in Narrative Situation Models","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Mind wandering and attention","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Distraction; Narrative; Task (project management); Cognitive psychology; Mind-wandering; Comprehension; Noise (video); Psychology; Computer science; Cognition; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03524527484993376,"score_gpt":0.30966845815903105,"score_spread":0.27442318330909726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946907340","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961282,0.000041693354,0.0019202172,0.00039656382,0.00006774608,0.00014036697,0.0000030459485,0.000023064445,0.0012791111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992287,0.00003376028,0.000039495993,0.0000358145,0.000016714746,0.000014302748,0.0000071210707,0.0000058442365,0.00061823014],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994656,0.000019697189,0.000089347544,0.00021675238,0.00011347645,0.00009511579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99981254,0.000030236279,0.00005176072,0.000055644177,0.000029401437,0.000020421445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000056699806,0.000066430934,0.00006725951,0.0000468459,0.00005122941,0.00004867595,0.00003722823,0.000026667361,0.000034764453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008966989,0.00005606232,0.000007184308,0.00019461564,0.00003216341,0.000661704,0.000011644309,0.000066108885,0.000014837301],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053406926,0.0017000025,0.14541851,0.0020711846,0.000017870116,0.000040051877,0.08087616,0.018815583,0.6973353,0.018578412,0.00029956942,0.03431328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0063839997,0.00074816623,0.065337025,0.0013274212,0.000063667685,0.00011714092,0.101467356,0.16733359,0.5509803,0.10334689,0.0006669201,0.002227522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000284567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005990278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.148518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009996171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044638626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22861551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003292801","doi":"10.1080/0163853x.2019.1700760","title":"Interpretation of Discourse Connectives Is Probabilistic: Evidence From the Study of <i>But</i> and <i>Although</i>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Speech and dialogue systems","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Interpretation (philosophy); Comprehension; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Meaning (existential); Linguistics; Probabilistic logic; Computer science; Natural language processing; Semantics (computer science); Logical connective; Relation (database); Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03827736900970941,"score_gpt":0.306500817544834,"score_spread":0.2682234485351246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003292801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9392311,0.0030861914,0.05247615,0.0041038543,0.0001262972,0.0007846238,0.000054832646,0.00004614959,0.00009078108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986132,0.000065136745,0.000877261,0.00030458235,0.00007469348,0.0000486935,0.0000023149926,0.000007983038,0.0000061814753],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985641,0.00013721269,0.0003674159,0.00043332938,0.00035293793,0.00014500608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817383,0.0007935204,0.0003254086,0.00036476954,0.00026206087,0.000080426114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019586718,0.00015218527,0.00030052685,0.000024048531,0.00006951454,0.00008817788,0.0007374693,0.000030017423,0.0000039144784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010928062,0.00009764581,0.00003402644,0.0004518694,0.0002161919,0.0007283231,0.00021835651,0.00008537255,0.0000029350035],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00088092557,0.001957996,0.12614281,0.002603204,0.00039792937,0.000021164367,0.7959417,0.0008185912,0.0076587936,0.0032531219,0.002680789,0.05764294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008984086,0.012165951,0.0725793,0.0072594476,0.0011810489,0.000036001267,0.5392202,0.10362338,0.22365713,0.027897859,0.0005222522,0.0028733138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004588528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018044889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2567215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000657319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021263419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39818805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170979526","doi":"10.1080/0163853x.2021.1924040","title":"Tense and Discourse Structure: The Timeline Hypothesis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Timeline; Linguistics; Computer science; Psychology; Discourse analysis; Natural language processing; Cognitive psychology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04003225172906693,"score_gpt":0.28853595645738817,"score_spread":0.24850370472832123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170979526","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83547676,0.03353978,0.00008167928,0.042760737,0.00051739725,0.00048822627,0.00066780276,0.0003142195,0.086153395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98821026,0.0006311855,0.00021951609,0.00076039805,0.00056194473,0.000039148836,0.00007362993,0.000041511354,0.009462408],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986968,0.00010480213,0.00027094712,0.00033360458,0.00029226264,0.00030159534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983428,0.0003379472,0.00014562112,0.0007038153,0.000391335,0.00007849137],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013207603,0.0002610097,0.0002497145,0.00005069758,0.00071238755,0.0008244644,0.00042195598,0.000044683107,0.002488978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032223627,0.00015594708,0.00006004618,0.00012602356,0.0011915984,0.00054007233,0.00017229572,0.00022263912,0.000049554237],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000098172386,0.0007266308,0.0010338813,0.00078436255,0.0006146822,0.00013799053,0.19746892,0.00006235441,0.0014503206,0.7263518,0.024660166,0.046610743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00118485,0.00009157751,0.001491108,0.00032503597,0.00070226646,0.00019823691,0.730004,0.00010619671,0.009524817,0.07026398,0.18477686,0.0013310862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008320565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031536445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6560878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012280174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032740302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99842286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294647296","doi":"10.1080/0163853x.2022.2107859","title":"Given-New Effects on the Duration of Gestures and of Words in Face-to-Face Dialogue","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"University of Manchester","keywords":"Gesture; Dialogic; Duration (music); Face (sociological concept); Linguistics; Psychology; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Speech recognition; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.030223172370517214,"score_gpt":0.2875024357856155,"score_spread":0.2572792634150983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294647296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9805591,0.0020611899,0.00003161819,0.0069491114,0.00009549116,0.00047766187,0.000081947044,0.000021643853,0.009722198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99856436,0.000065133194,0.000021560381,0.00015502863,0.00006208592,0.0001183193,0.000022153805,0.000012465339,0.0009789063],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917674,0.00012176572,0.00021388957,0.00013858364,0.00023306934,0.00011594904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909574,0.00039343486,0.00016378584,0.0002657483,0.000054674023,0.00002661489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001967053,0.00011333916,0.00017719534,0.000105562074,0.00018410383,0.00006202526,0.00031678707,0.000015310572,0.00017647182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001795789,0.000076894314,0.000024506038,0.00012904366,0.00018532398,0.00015511538,0.00012878614,0.00014102431,0.000002803659],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019821625,0.00045394502,0.0015043225,0.00071002997,0.00007778345,0.000004585469,0.6497721,0.0017479572,0.0011647622,0.33341968,0.005444275,0.0055023525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013431464,0.0009789455,0.009980811,0.0006240922,0.000114863324,0.000004229882,0.9111422,0.000084518186,0.027731523,0.02864975,0.018739214,0.0006067484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00052660034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023452549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30476993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013987508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013177269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3135659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386840004","doi":"10.1080/0163853x.2023.2255075","title":"Non-gendered pronoun processing: an investigation of the gender non-specific third person singular pronoun ‘TA’ in Chinese","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Gender Studies in Language","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Pronoun; Psychology; Operationalization; Sentence; Reading (process); Comprehension; Reading comprehension; Linguistics; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.05084935405160954,"score_gpt":0.3401779657252137,"score_spread":0.28932861167360413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386840004","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9868518,0.0012206598,0.00008771285,0.0016033382,0.000349611,0.0011244663,0.000010597405,0.00014948696,0.008602341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983859,0.00016417068,0.00033767545,0.00007890932,0.0002905593,0.00022637179,0.00002525916,0.000042046595,0.00044912763],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743927,0.00014685297,0.00036875796,0.0005690917,0.000852229,0.00062379974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987725,0.000057274316,0.00030192596,0.00041356176,0.0003380156,0.00011672629],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009752971,0.00028438054,0.00032731163,0.00019598562,0.0007787067,0.00015033601,0.0008101229,0.0001479125,0.000025389469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003203866,0.00020577732,0.00007493954,0.0027837476,0.0010211095,0.00074838125,0.00013343999,0.00025743473,0.000018015078],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028687109,0.00019999583,0.22027563,0.0008975282,0.00003500111,0.000009728289,0.7703635,0.00020627427,0.0027939775,0.0004499956,0.0006747823,0.0040648705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077154307,0.000077101686,0.41830224,0.00029793603,0.000046326615,0.0000025820784,0.57136273,0.00074459094,0.0020992458,0.0052275765,0.00041902796,0.00064909784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044221163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028485467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1990008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014266295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011164513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8391356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392897283","doi":"10.1080/0163853x.2024.2311637","title":"Idiom meaning selection following a prior context: eye movement evidence of L1 direct retrieval and L2 compositional assembly","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Literal and figurative language; Context (archaeology); Linguistics; Literal (mathematical logic); Selection (genetic algorithm); Meaning (existential); Computer science; Context effect; Verb; Psychology; Contrast (vision); Artificial intelligence; Natural language processing; History; Word (group theory)","score_opus":0.025879979987601467,"score_gpt":0.3552799646800409,"score_spread":0.3293999846924395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392897283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96209776,0.029240765,0.00219769,0.00035024338,0.00053359487,0.00029029604,0.000023338442,0.00012859203,0.005137743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99876493,0.00011765219,0.00013124256,0.00013850027,0.00018452982,0.00004731519,0.000021296097,0.000023951674,0.0005705582],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987074,0.0000871985,0.00027013564,0.00039428094,0.00032990592,0.00021103871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934834,0.00025731258,0.000092170776,0.00009602743,0.00015125409,0.000054865843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038883515,0.0001616074,0.00023396271,0.00013536972,0.0001219239,0.000111648646,0.00008817733,0.000071182905,0.00014236859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016996259,0.0001397002,0.00008439813,0.00044676472,0.00006256462,0.00040964267,0.000027672986,0.00013624958,0.000019532157],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0051665003,0.0020816473,0.029036932,0.010106076,0.004624083,0.00062788726,0.10207969,0.000041738775,0.65798086,0.047199875,0.0026736073,0.1383811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005552689,0.003537139,0.05490002,0.024530292,0.0046311817,0.00024141205,0.07242526,0.0018854701,0.80539924,0.022013946,0.0019854023,0.0028979674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009692536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006302624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14741835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036710448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014123433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5696809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393853059","doi":"10.1080/0163853x.2024.2319898","title":"Selective View of the Last 50 Years of the Experimental Psycholinguistics of Idiom, Metaphor, and Irony: A Commentary","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Irony; Sarcasm; Psycholinguistics; Literal and figurative language; Metaphor; Linguistics; Psychology; Cognitive science; Cognition; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01795898410938557,"score_gpt":0.33651247824682967,"score_spread":0.3185534941374441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393853059","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95740026,0.036305018,0.000038319282,0.0003222161,0.0006186395,0.00030235748,0.00015992677,0.0000144066025,0.0048388275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99933475,0.00018376263,0.000042288582,0.00021087898,0.00006678422,0.00003583955,0.0000060466773,0.000017314707,0.0001023271],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.999186,0.00009266227,0.00023342155,0.0001840125,0.00018736112,0.000116576804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994453,0.000096833784,0.000131629,0.0002224955,0.00008284688,0.000020887961],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012906505,0.00010867494,0.00020262267,0.000046678117,0.000038261856,0.000011519707,0.0002028538,0.000044303826,0.00009975356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005815342,0.00006521682,0.00008759334,0.0003689023,0.00033995768,0.000041441945,0.000060859587,0.00011762588,0.0000024269063],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013714005,0.009788184,0.039364632,0.0132388035,0.0068731667,0.000049659448,0.5594325,0.000013800485,0.15450178,0.058070865,0.03854228,0.11875293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027836831,0.0008179333,0.07226559,0.0032613473,0.0023868468,0.00010594502,0.14113519,0.000027257243,0.7456856,0.014637223,0.01611173,0.00078167487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015228396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006203355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5911838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009560819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005871728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26594648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395081293","doi":"10.1080/0163853x.2024.2337547","title":"The contributions of Walter Kintsch: Cascading cognitive science","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Comprehension; Cognition; Cognitive science; Representation (politics); Computer science; Empirical research; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017736860675550685,"score_gpt":0.38875018857914173,"score_spread":0.37101332790359104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395081293","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.895889,0.015019489,0.0015854014,0.0051727635,0.0014582895,0.0003319783,0.000115320356,0.00016362261,0.08026415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99800324,0.000058290312,0.000014603405,0.00005078745,0.00010188984,0.000029682154,0.000004898929,0.000008398768,0.001728209],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991774,0.0000193275,0.00014026191,0.0002395037,0.00017811074,0.00024539884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992464,0.00034402456,0.000039726216,0.00008463904,0.00024093082,0.00004423981],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003892453,0.000077963065,0.00008392103,0.00006946096,0.000351038,0.00011925661,0.00017575387,0.000021407064,0.00016752763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005473098,0.000047096484,0.000029625424,0.00057092414,0.0006279209,0.000115302864,0.00004680482,0.00013618426,0.00016993356],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002111838,0.00044784884,0.009703563,0.0005158121,0.00052665523,0.000120895864,0.04970836,0.000006846761,0.010378449,0.7685135,0.0071496274,0.15271728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026280996,0.0009038645,0.26476398,0.0075785536,0.0007643533,0.00044988323,0.12855469,0.00038963897,0.2629894,0.0202126,0.30865496,0.0021099825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013860004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005850302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74830085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019812667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000393398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2699936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407652482","doi":"10.1080/0163853x.2025.2462513","title":"Representing and remembering text paraphrases: a phantom recollection analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Recall; Computer science; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Discourse analysis; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03102178513511694,"score_gpt":0.3468820137749632,"score_spread":0.31586022863984625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407652482","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9687359,0.001280662,0.0016081935,0.0005053649,0.00013229827,0.00019383572,0.0000061427554,0.00013420203,0.027403405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950658,0.0009784261,0.00013476246,0.00029616134,0.000041511044,0.00006188853,0.0000018459008,0.000008424221,0.0034111578],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854064,0.000046927522,0.00027943234,0.000654533,0.00020610035,0.0002723949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992046,0.00025874976,0.00014601545,0.00023519155,0.000096890486,0.000058568603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019008503,0.00015961491,0.00024539087,0.00042417145,0.00045563994,0.00029746915,0.00020891747,0.000046997167,0.00009800446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020220077,0.0001359735,0.00006030916,0.004003948,0.00015564899,0.0006465244,0.00009363417,0.000106974214,0.000006332646],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00069379073,0.0012679918,0.45802292,0.008882367,0.0012642388,0.00014689178,0.007323451,0.00596862,0.36506096,0.009709145,0.0036202767,0.13803934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007016723,0.00007795558,0.007947451,0.00049563317,0.0010622706,0.00002931651,0.0056308424,0.008000931,0.9632278,0.006166561,0.005957225,0.0007023453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006809461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012224488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5981668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000128758775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013837655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5544839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}