{"meta":{"query_hash":"a1070ab1e44b","filters":{"venue":"Discourse Processes"},"cohort_total":30,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":30,"exported":30,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/a1070ab1e44b","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Discourse+Processes"},"results":[{"id":"W1968673961","doi":"10.1080/0163853x.2012.687863","title":"Are There Necessary Conditions for Inducing a Sense of Sarcastic Irony?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":155,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Irony; Computer science; Psychology; Linguistics; Communication; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06779163403053766,"score_gpt":0.40178449198492905,"score_spread":0.3339928579543914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968673961","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9522588,0.00040087878,0.018922385,0.0017505457,0.00008241725,0.0002658678,0.00036068165,0.00021301559,0.02574533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926408,0.00013366881,0.006562137,0.0000790849,0.000023133716,0.000110926994,0.00019283238,0.000036496873,0.0002209308],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99650985,0.0012243429,0.0005289151,0.00050502317,0.0007627084,0.0004692363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9768993,0.01222496,0.0050046532,0.0020928397,0.00231516,0.0014630607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031901684,0.00047363914,0.0005391969,0.00088594755,0.0011985279,0.0016087613,0.00052032655,0.0013526414,0.007891425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02745583,0.00095798605,0.0004757001,0.00029586826,0.0029668333,0.0025793617,0.0016830004,0.0009821268,0.0008288441],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0048666843,0.0015992351,0.19131759,0.004230782,0.00022846014,0.004689609,0.026131166,0.001745871,0.551525,0.12978336,0.0023027712,0.08157943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043270618,0.0033468097,0.72643006,0.0009993,0.00023990794,0.007300459,0.03267766,0.0057015037,0.12936588,0.083027594,0.010249953,0.00022811997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032673747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007656012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007891425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006718055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013166807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026399434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969127682","doi":"10.1080/01638530903420960","title":"The Role of Prior Knowledge in Learning From Analogies in Science Texts","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Waterloo","keywords":"Analogy; Domain (mathematical analysis); Domain knowledge; Computer science; Natural language processing; Sentence; Artificial intelligence; Control (management); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive science; Linguistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02201854721302503,"score_gpt":0.37077587109824534,"score_spread":0.3487573238852203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969127682","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99159336,0.00013043721,0.0025218388,0.00009465205,0.0000050591534,0.00006521546,0.000015653382,0.000020925738,0.005552952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99668723,0.00010011912,0.0025229906,0.000039856248,0.000010101176,0.000069221634,0.00004198765,0.000010370822,0.0005180972],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949811,0.002354548,0.00028433194,0.0010431473,0.0010883718,0.00024848265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8768644,0.10059597,0.011080475,0.005985497,0.0021351413,0.0033385837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047950484,0.0005175104,0.0005449852,0.0012641468,0.0005821677,0.0029471866,0.001337873,0.0010239922,0.0036764108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0746087,0.0008493849,0.00040533819,0.0005951713,0.0018599861,0.005922967,0.0026522737,0.001981321,0.00025051902],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010747438,0.021249317,0.29067412,0.0024427846,0.0009445514,0.0013600839,0.033468608,0.01039202,0.19583355,0.02953255,0.0007198354,0.40263504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010084016,0.00753611,0.8547106,0.0004314686,0.0007707094,0.0010854554,0.0052527105,0.024722222,0.05403776,0.04700457,0.0032126543,0.00022739604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000908878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011110975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047950484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00090043806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006249022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025358915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984066794","doi":"10.1080/0163853x.2013.778168","title":"Influence of Role-Switching on Phonetic Convergence in Conversation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Acadia University","keywords":"Conversation; Dominance (genetics); Accommodation; Psychology; Convergence (economics); Speech recognition; Contrast (vision); Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Communication; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.016229724669636264,"score_gpt":0.33886180774066954,"score_spread":0.3226320830710333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984066794","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99702233,0.00006917739,0.0010051007,0.000024112709,0.000007211406,0.0000112599155,0.0000103968505,0.000017172302,0.001833209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987966,0.000031141117,0.0008794284,0.000015820384,0.000004260712,0.000014438086,0.000014981581,0.000011386891,0.0002319772],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971993,0.0016721368,0.00013080263,0.00037081054,0.00041252733,0.00021453685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99529344,0.0030392199,0.0005454787,0.00027837686,0.0004303061,0.0004132093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014468589,0.00036121125,0.00032480693,0.00038646517,0.0006631132,0.0014420762,0.000309716,0.0003894778,0.00153443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009865847,0.00027593577,0.00020303071,0.00010377423,0.0010719417,0.0006600111,0.0013180634,0.00053516496,0.00021396813],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031033582,0.0003106682,0.04696399,0.00031569507,0.00008885578,0.00086364616,0.04603187,0.000520414,0.8623294,0.0012661295,0.00015256135,0.038053483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002768993,0.003465154,0.73378587,0.0002235988,0.00044738068,0.0023872026,0.06664195,0.008072871,0.17313129,0.004432166,0.006852246,0.0002832762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000737722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009828883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00153443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003386364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042187318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007651806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984587708","doi":"10.1207/s15326950dp3303_1","title":"Does Sarcasm Always Sting? Investigating the Impact of Ironic Insults and Ironic Compliments","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":165,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sarcasm; Irony; Insult; Politeness; Psychology; Criticism; Perception; Interpretation (philosophy); Expression (computer science); Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Literature; Neuroscience; Art","score_opus":0.03872768548491306,"score_gpt":0.34144804522292443,"score_spread":0.30272035973801137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984587708","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975612,0.00010501064,0.00009097582,0.00012870222,0.000010538911,0.000010629554,0.000007873222,0.0000033636938,0.0020816352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994394,0.0000793762,0.00012218507,0.000056020115,0.000009896242,0.000010867962,0.000011382034,0.000003969128,0.00026688492],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977191,0.001355341,0.00007845178,0.00017477978,0.0004943541,0.00017798615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9701939,0.017462313,0.008448867,0.0009775774,0.0015470708,0.0013702171],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003559083,0.0004550527,0.00039999667,0.0007306983,0.0008848871,0.002014903,0.00038632684,0.0009151013,0.0025333925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030846305,0.00025512802,0.00023340808,0.00029908266,0.0021366125,0.0010027402,0.0012887194,0.0014136571,0.00023119894],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0070944154,0.0038376597,0.5836735,0.0015668465,0.0004388506,0.004734414,0.26089117,0.00028778412,0.06869582,0.004863917,0.001872889,0.062042836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000072577255,0.0020733636,0.91027606,0.00019473369,0.0001678807,0.0014591058,0.076246135,0.00043400502,0.0045882384,0.002179148,0.0022591886,0.000049573267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00065201847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010738663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003559083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067445886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004500047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018822432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989804978","doi":"10.1207/s15326950dp4201_3","title":"Metaphor Production in Online Conversation: Gender and Friendship Status","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Digital Communication and Language","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Metaphor; Conversation; Friendship; Psychology; Literal and figurative language; Production (economics); Social psychology; Linguistics; Communication","score_opus":0.025903370425685777,"score_gpt":0.2893522554477257,"score_spread":0.2634488850220399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989804978","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965808,0.00028944967,0.0006673109,0.00005205239,0.00001383807,0.000015396447,0.000020400266,0.00000860699,0.002352196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989976,0.000098943055,0.00028461963,0.000014708789,0.000007773417,0.000016087044,0.000013104507,0.0000061496776,0.0005610341],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975593,0.0016827454,0.00009395254,0.00019407988,0.0002809038,0.0001890058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896572,0.0075417273,0.0012802192,0.00031604938,0.0006768221,0.0005279598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021430075,0.00032281177,0.0004329638,0.0009850534,0.001634601,0.0021278497,0.00027194322,0.0005167937,0.0032563086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015269041,0.0002564596,0.00017089608,0.0003577888,0.0010218127,0.0012245359,0.0016778662,0.00046687678,0.00044296673],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013575038,0.00022762343,0.19126065,0.00040383384,0.00008513554,0.0019442936,0.6915943,0.0001149371,0.048915714,0.0014731511,0.00043953693,0.062183376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055655863,0.0013827191,0.45565757,0.00023451666,0.0001404974,0.0061306553,0.5077098,0.0010890744,0.012890751,0.0019193308,0.0126393195,0.00015005072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000507728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008089245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0032563086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025479062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022095349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011333466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994528807","doi":"10.1080/0163853x.2013.766123","title":"Processes of Discourse Integration: Evidence From Event-Related Brain Potentials","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Indeterminate; N400; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Linguistics; Situational ethics; Discourse analysis; Event (particle physics); Underspecification; Natural language processing; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Event-related potential; Social psychology; Philosophy; Mathematics; History","score_opus":0.03403277695470193,"score_gpt":0.33990133493217956,"score_spread":0.30586855797747764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994528807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9835633,0.00035522948,0.009815205,0.00013216722,0.00001674913,0.00005679597,0.00008404232,0.000049884875,0.005926508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99354655,0.00022393627,0.0056115757,0.00004459597,0.000010788418,0.000046581277,0.000074144,0.000021405871,0.00042042305],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921596,0.00026640113,0.000059695838,0.00019743439,0.00021170451,0.000048896178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946185,0.0034034664,0.0010537347,0.00038612494,0.00039574824,0.00014248241],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015728178,0.0003403114,0.0002192831,0.00059634756,0.00022349285,0.0013098532,0.00027299402,0.0005965033,0.001282217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017239263,0.00035354344,0.0001275733,0.00035583752,0.00094907737,0.002176719,0.001042831,0.0006708586,0.00022074755],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016325692,0.00038362708,0.049994785,0.00075851864,0.00011592868,0.0022568915,0.022015192,0.00064174685,0.7928475,0.0068458486,0.0003185401,0.12218885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024159362,0.0014343519,0.80442065,0.00018899747,0.00018643039,0.0068215877,0.007119122,0.0067602894,0.13334368,0.03363753,0.0057084896,0.00013727807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044271216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004447321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0015728178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022229952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018920093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008317947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020560311","doi":"10.1080/0163853x.2012.664759","title":"Japanese Negotiation Through Emerging Final Particles in Everyday Talk","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Computer science; Conversation analysis; Linguistics; Psychology; Sociology; Communication; Conversation; Social science","score_opus":0.0869238224511804,"score_gpt":0.33999512743218663,"score_spread":0.2530713049810062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020560311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.876606,0.0006770213,0.052536596,0.00057291583,0.00006042863,0.0000944264,0.00004474379,0.00030389553,0.069104016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992721,0.00007770153,0.0049118833,0.000029670837,0.000008082482,0.000023979255,0.000026893784,0.00005102385,0.0021497635],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834025,0.0007863756,0.0000977685,0.0002983951,0.0002688448,0.00020833344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987348,0.0006889809,0.00013741666,0.00015000274,0.00017141018,0.000117470794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001915891,0.000536753,0.0003546461,0.0012462937,0.0027989803,0.0044495813,0.0006775548,0.001092867,0.0026949304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034699338,0.00061105046,0.00053662865,0.0007849315,0.005513035,0.004965229,0.0038430751,0.0013179868,0.00044427894],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024657807,0.00006762621,0.0136078885,0.0003295557,0.00005743502,0.0037093626,0.5485069,0.0012229742,0.038448732,0.3545667,0.0009360968,0.038300138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013863154,0.00060999516,0.055773124,0.0004415991,0.0003432239,0.0037421223,0.46654335,0.033155184,0.033557255,0.2903922,0.11493309,0.00037027497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004334133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049191695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044495813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013219406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007897094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010132313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021948023","doi":"10.1080/0163853x.2012.665988","title":"Clausal Continuations in Japanese","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Linguistics; Natural language processing","score_opus":0.05843316519508333,"score_gpt":0.3328303474858093,"score_spread":0.27439718229072596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021948023","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80504835,0.0030701694,0.028017819,0.0011758913,0.00021986187,0.00009251284,0.0002007258,0.0005473894,0.16162728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888365,0.00031745984,0.004418699,0.000079786136,0.000037844475,0.000035160803,0.00008776844,0.000084444895,0.0061021848],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894065,0.00032047532,0.000077350276,0.00025520127,0.00022401541,0.00018226032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998757,0.00040468754,0.00018280296,0.0002071581,0.0003114682,0.00013687341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014270459,0.0005144665,0.000405147,0.001510005,0.004638974,0.002502388,0.0005340893,0.000913703,0.004147299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034957314,0.00050584745,0.00043985678,0.0012522282,0.003030921,0.0025708156,0.0028946016,0.0013051198,0.00057921384],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006048554,0.00008662117,0.020462088,0.0005876006,0.000053260406,0.009887346,0.42815953,0.0006602977,0.033430588,0.38720888,0.0060374984,0.112821504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015727538,0.00055115815,0.10193957,0.0010123748,0.00047484357,0.0128011955,0.20140508,0.011557758,0.019060552,0.15059252,0.5000221,0.00042564337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014968417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016237834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014968417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018999189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013671148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029762626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023315320","doi":"10.1080/01638530903347635","title":"How Do Children Respond to Verbal Irony in Face-to-Face Communication? The Development of Mode Adoption Across Middle Childhood","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of Guelph","keywords":"Irony; Comprehension; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Face (sociological concept); Literal and figurative language; Linguistics; Developmental psychology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02036686975759433,"score_gpt":0.33215658542216875,"score_spread":0.3117897156645744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023315320","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989411,0.00011544611,0.00014070126,0.00003360401,0.0000028282805,0.000004961268,0.000015187751,0.000009129487,0.0007370008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99880373,0.00023132429,0.00042492303,0.000032674492,0.0000032825894,0.000014735065,0.000035204503,0.000007661273,0.00044648815],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990152,0.00026602062,0.0000628417,0.00015040017,0.0003319393,0.00017359294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947471,0.0021890656,0.00206638,0.0003055947,0.00048704358,0.00020477524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018294522,0.00036048985,0.00032415948,0.0011271042,0.00032040547,0.0016169624,0.0003159106,0.0007942648,0.0008941682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015097297,0.00046216676,0.0002296446,0.00035719888,0.0010676103,0.0013671623,0.0007626372,0.00071451947,0.0004516937],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002953442,0.00026285308,0.74024135,0.00018988799,0.000059329865,0.0026893306,0.13429609,0.00015010363,0.06406236,0.00051683426,0.00044714203,0.05678944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008660995,0.00040839496,0.94834644,0.00008078702,0.00005222522,0.0040779407,0.037208483,0.00024194986,0.0074287523,0.00046772862,0.001637979,0.000040531126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015971101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00250196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0018294522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003423646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022618298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009675145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036304588","doi":"10.1080/0163853x.2005.9651679","title":"Representing Complex Narrative Goal Structures: Competing Memory-Based and Situational Influences","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Situational ethics; Narrative; Contradiction; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Sentence; Psychology; Natural language processing; Cognitive science; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.032155510705301926,"score_gpt":0.3684931890225077,"score_spread":0.3363376783172058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036304588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877572,0.00025957925,0.007362317,0.00006045972,0.000009786902,0.000029411558,0.000025451687,0.000056362504,0.004439491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99597746,0.00015081865,0.003253059,0.000028091596,0.00000991012,0.000021088206,0.00004358869,0.000038171314,0.00047791863],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983323,0.0006916752,0.00008332202,0.00039787518,0.00039434148,0.00010047699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98567873,0.009945725,0.0020390581,0.0011352948,0.00078121485,0.00042001624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020214934,0.00042153895,0.0003359892,0.0006895685,0.00030442255,0.0024816568,0.0005370803,0.0005452629,0.0012398768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025133535,0.0005727884,0.0002724098,0.0004186416,0.0009160095,0.0023127352,0.001170898,0.0007738118,0.0001974953],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033887993,0.0007020131,0.16297972,0.0013317347,0.00053694914,0.0011598417,0.039368954,0.005245557,0.46167913,0.008283147,0.0006827916,0.31464145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029084165,0.0044560605,0.717019,0.00036024608,0.0011622056,0.0021595147,0.017930007,0.028804999,0.20567878,0.015208084,0.006561933,0.00036826925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00090393715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012812396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0024816568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032673686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031235992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010690808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040555246","doi":"10.1080/0163853x.2010.532757","title":"When Sarcasm Stings","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Sarcasm; Aggression; Psychology; Perspective (graphical); Negativity effect; Social psychology; Argument (complex analysis); Statement (logic); Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Irony; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04890501108375642,"score_gpt":0.3259629704623055,"score_spread":0.27705795937854905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040555246","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95117456,0.0016507446,0.00471607,0.0023951423,0.00095282437,0.00011088807,0.00015867161,0.00027455424,0.038566597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895034,0.0005286979,0.0017423048,0.00097481004,0.00016578822,0.000060611383,0.00011760226,0.00006446912,0.0068422416],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989569,0.00046693388,0.000085203785,0.00011845867,0.00023985286,0.0001327045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971764,0.0008831004,0.00090918737,0.00022078215,0.0004927655,0.00031782323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009667101,0.0005727597,0.00032812098,0.00050536194,0.0007985142,0.001581945,0.0002751912,0.0015709065,0.005212594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008887776,0.00022586297,0.00026385896,0.00017787179,0.00088788156,0.0009955316,0.0014252933,0.0010784756,0.0016047896],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026108683,0.00041521777,0.075947665,0.0026180453,0.00057624414,0.016839638,0.24256764,0.00018231613,0.42527956,0.009023971,0.03438571,0.18955313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020798208,0.0041433973,0.36085445,0.0016762742,0.00049729535,0.06576766,0.27322298,0.0014363148,0.05422282,0.010635421,0.22705981,0.0002755687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015887857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043566024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005212594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022957587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016806745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017437875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077448887","doi":"10.1080/0163853x.2012.654760","title":"Turn-Continuation by Self and by Other","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Continuation; Variety (cybernetics); Computer science; Point (geometry); Turn-taking; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Programming language; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021068834336324612,"score_gpt":0.28264676891304935,"score_spread":0.26157793457672474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077448887","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23504035,0.0008814434,0.088770434,0.0019494572,0.00048802476,0.00016196554,0.00012292979,0.00080173067,0.6717837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93266666,0.00025519638,0.012914126,0.00018320151,0.00009217004,0.00006308426,0.000086146894,0.00038417647,0.05335525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983681,0.0008114046,0.000049651728,0.0002834013,0.00028037303,0.00020708928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982002,0.0007565652,0.00012432388,0.0004916931,0.000247294,0.00017990044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018892877,0.0005201049,0.00028921297,0.0008297631,0.0023874682,0.003657752,0.00059260207,0.0009482603,0.01367996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039092493,0.00028673376,0.0005945941,0.0003977817,0.0037156318,0.0047800606,0.0033673213,0.0016629733,0.0018628918],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025572826,0.00007642886,0.0042311726,0.0001604477,0.00003478002,0.001605413,0.09201127,0.00042313035,0.011858229,0.8231463,0.0043967157,0.061800364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005129454,0.00045062142,0.009689888,0.0005203823,0.00012065344,0.0038404576,0.08371557,0.0057078684,0.02043099,0.2525243,0.6228402,0.000107770145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013823957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019578657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01367996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010962082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080055493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04576397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077670376","doi":"10.1080/01638530902959570","title":"Readers' Knowledge of Popular Genre","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Media Influence and Health","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Romance; Theme (computing); Fantasy; Reading (process); Narrative; Plot (graphics); Literature; Feeling; Psychology; Linguistics; Computer science; Art; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.059103042047260475,"score_gpt":0.3386924360607816,"score_spread":0.2795893940135211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077670376","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98979807,0.00068612705,0.00039352052,0.00023333715,0.000018357867,0.000011623755,0.00005586947,0.000009752962,0.008793162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985489,0.00031927848,0.00019012824,0.00006321675,0.000030103693,0.000008780798,0.00004066672,0.00000411141,0.00079463184],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889463,0.00041244677,0.00013093893,0.00016481649,0.00032262455,0.00007454552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.960822,0.026771734,0.0068441024,0.0016265674,0.0032140987,0.0007214718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002759405,0.00021186618,0.00039396805,0.001925423,0.00044213037,0.002442262,0.000292458,0.00071941986,0.0036109812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03210624,0.00020425649,0.00019937714,0.0007394539,0.00076895725,0.0023048094,0.00095708104,0.00060582766,0.0003703785],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008149281,0.0003114736,0.56412506,0.0009253272,0.0001609171,0.0013157184,0.2785916,0.00020562482,0.013925211,0.0017353394,0.00090682675,0.13698198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049171333,0.0011388785,0.8151663,0.00056348176,0.00019077183,0.0024848685,0.1573038,0.0010715009,0.0051080217,0.0029907974,0.013844258,0.0000881435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000629878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006746706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036109812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031393685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015431053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014593363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077773484","doi":"10.1080/0163853x.2014.883730","title":"Effect of Dialogue on Demonstrations: Direct Quotations, Facial Portrayals, Hand Gestures, and Figurative References","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Hearing Impairment and Communication","field":"Psychology","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Gesture; Literal and figurative language; Face (sociological concept); Linguistics; Referent; Psychology; Nonverbal communication; Class (philosophy); Computer science; Communication; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021254705367894755,"score_gpt":0.35506398905015485,"score_spread":0.3338092836822601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077773484","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964855,0.00019439158,0.00049830135,0.000030427826,0.000025409658,0.000066421395,0.00007866326,0.000049564245,0.0025713153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961731,0.00018175277,0.0020454659,0.000053222935,0.00004077663,0.00020242177,0.00015732796,0.00006690068,0.0010791488],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99039865,0.0057744645,0.0009808391,0.0014194618,0.00095554837,0.00047112434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7288127,0.2554438,0.006527354,0.0039620753,0.0020779874,0.0031759616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006623502,0.0011600471,0.0009090304,0.0008706959,0.00054348516,0.0021416834,0.00051452947,0.0011453038,0.0065909396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.095267974,0.0006688244,0.00039483016,0.00030695397,0.001506764,0.0021038193,0.0026829639,0.0013590242,0.00053423975],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.085380286,0.006932774,0.10019577,0.0035435986,0.00071637594,0.0012358375,0.026657501,0.0014268783,0.6139091,0.0009472409,0.00088152644,0.15817302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011150837,0.034493644,0.8316387,0.00046563157,0.0009511555,0.0019811888,0.006149432,0.004556895,0.113079704,0.0011725652,0.0040745125,0.00032149034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008075606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005770716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006623502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029941788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029057832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035028875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080264995","doi":"10.1080/01638530902959901","title":"Understanding Verbal Irony: Clues From Interpretation of Direct and Indirect Ironic Remarks","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Irony; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Perception; Interpretation (philosophy); Counterfactual thinking; Statement (logic); Face (sociological concept); Linguistics; Social psychology; Sarcasm; Pragmatics; Indirect speech; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.03040161658876743,"score_gpt":0.315692277819841,"score_spread":0.28529066123107355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080264995","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879094,0.00018552909,0.003259931,0.00029581663,0.000013368609,0.000012168218,0.000009467702,0.00001339251,0.008301048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984611,0.00006347396,0.0011662437,0.000046634665,0.000008268021,0.0000058278124,0.00001294741,0.000005953591,0.00022965838],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991767,0.00045776553,0.000033559438,0.00007934429,0.0001833212,0.00006932151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944084,0.0036030745,0.0010236193,0.00030223985,0.00043725598,0.00022534664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018046269,0.00038739876,0.00019949276,0.0009956098,0.00066676934,0.0023480768,0.00034120248,0.0010501991,0.0016333907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013194345,0.0003224559,0.00016328649,0.00023277313,0.0027326504,0.0033679937,0.0016465661,0.0012727979,0.00014168481],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018130019,0.0003506258,0.11249144,0.0007063012,0.000070323666,0.0029004114,0.60646856,0.00064284867,0.16048035,0.041948304,0.0008943585,0.07123349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017227842,0.0014638911,0.46083555,0.0006117139,0.00017753485,0.004927509,0.36771378,0.009041814,0.029384889,0.11022768,0.015216308,0.00022707097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004710464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008466492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0023480768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035541132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002604386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009543836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092026556","doi":"10.1080/0163853x.2015.1029858","title":"Phantom Recollection of Bridging and Elaborative Inferences","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Recall; Psychology; Inference; Cognitive psychology; Bridging (networking); Perception; Recall test; Free recall; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08818690078360042,"score_gpt":0.35222074027126843,"score_spread":0.264033839487668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092026556","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9204531,0.00019675354,0.07206938,0.00014981058,0.000026781954,0.00010411771,0.00009116955,0.00022356183,0.006685268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875107,0.0000707521,0.011562373,0.00003515088,0.000013794076,0.000071120725,0.000078648794,0.000037945123,0.0006195105],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99630994,0.0016061248,0.00026359214,0.0006372197,0.0010315573,0.00015159433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.948858,0.032565847,0.006718273,0.009458043,0.001674848,0.0007249205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005916415,0.0004883038,0.00046380897,0.0011285761,0.00042813295,0.0016105345,0.00081211154,0.00057865045,0.0033888815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05812525,0.00047879358,0.0004876732,0.00058651407,0.0017897784,0.0044872384,0.0018711427,0.0010186159,0.00030201767],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010365576,0.0012641737,0.15436602,0.0013514779,0.0005096831,0.0016539439,0.036452413,0.008286022,0.38464707,0.096743055,0.0009751952,0.3033854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032601022,0.0044306596,0.49524552,0.00024023201,0.0005307439,0.0035080134,0.0040734825,0.08577293,0.2263439,0.17364483,0.0055366135,0.00034706673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00065723225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007307575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005916415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047788327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061428605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0312894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145480817","doi":"10.1080/01638530802629141","title":"Noticing and Revising Discrepancies as Texts Unfold","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Institute of Education Sciences; University of Minnesota; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Narrative; Comprehension; Notice; Trait; Psychology; Character (mathematics); Linguistics; Reading comprehension; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Reading (process); Philosophy","score_opus":0.01638062217684927,"score_gpt":0.352023122038283,"score_spread":0.33564249986143374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145480817","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9694294,0.00043300618,0.022976603,0.0005405897,0.00003674068,0.00007023241,0.00004613573,0.0003949551,0.006072324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98788816,0.00017874425,0.01065688,0.000055576966,0.000019061414,0.000023777648,0.00006361881,0.00009793144,0.0010162414],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99284875,0.0041047614,0.00041007745,0.0010183003,0.0013449731,0.00027304055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91217774,0.06357036,0.011734897,0.007838944,0.0038559365,0.00082214014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00679009,0.0005458994,0.00051379635,0.0012452393,0.0008073778,0.003757639,0.0012139492,0.0019879625,0.0018136728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10317154,0.00067547616,0.0003620024,0.0005984312,0.0021689301,0.006844449,0.0020846752,0.0016824636,0.0004198486],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008732984,0.00023267399,0.08109704,0.0007904825,0.00012175333,0.00327825,0.51840156,0.0026123342,0.12513368,0.016437333,0.0013319989,0.24968956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020205262,0.002222116,0.32842004,0.0013839222,0.0005301967,0.008963247,0.3123957,0.04966699,0.14272839,0.08943031,0.063372955,0.0006841117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000602859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007015764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00679009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053708797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005224389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03590983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2603775804","doi":"10.1080/0163853x.2017.1289794","title":"Can Differences in Word Frequency Explain Why Narrative Fiction Is a Better Predictor of Verbal Ability than Nonfiction?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Narrative; Reading (process); Linguistics; Psychology; Word lists by frequency; Word (group theory); Nonverbal communication; Communication; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027240325607796136,"score_gpt":0.327350322701455,"score_spread":0.3001099970936588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2603775804","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99615115,0.0004095385,0.00055606215,0.00021872675,0.000020788662,0.00001159542,0.00012895909,0.000010644697,0.0024924756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990115,0.00012176759,0.0003561626,0.00003249048,0.000019022875,0.000008939272,0.00011929105,0.000008270157,0.00032246695],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913126,0.00028313097,0.0001193873,0.00023632239,0.00015430721,0.00007557562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9774303,0.015602622,0.0041651297,0.0012798054,0.00080734247,0.0007147741],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015377363,0.000362324,0.00031140633,0.0023156384,0.00039390475,0.0011455591,0.0003733154,0.0006722279,0.005805669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022068443,0.00015922375,0.00026504928,0.0013442112,0.0014769174,0.0011281698,0.00045945588,0.00049840735,0.00082791],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002500166,0.00013766062,0.9676238,0.00014918855,0.00013839685,0.00029774563,0.004696191,0.00009258091,0.0045453315,0.0005738097,0.00029906497,0.021196134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053097233,0.00011085643,0.99654084,0.000030898664,0.000031340503,0.0002662124,0.0010916858,0.00015807213,0.00061189657,0.00070077187,0.00044465676,0.000007450072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011018908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013474963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005805669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016316198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002072322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019421875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765136063","doi":"10.1080/0163853x.2017.1381059","title":"Being Sad Is Not Always Bad: The Influence of Affect on Expository Text Comprehension","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Psychology; Comprehension; Valence (chemistry); Reading comprehension; Mood; Affect (linguistics); Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Reading (process); Linguistics; Communication","score_opus":0.04973546694126523,"score_gpt":0.3868730904584946,"score_spread":0.33713762351722937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765136063","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99855536,0.000038388076,0.00026180703,0.000028627479,0.000006424297,0.000012202689,0.000017291397,0.0000040032355,0.0010758787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99907315,0.000041987416,0.00043842295,0.000037503985,0.000008842491,0.00002661552,0.000027973061,0.000007325798,0.00033822676],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920446,0.0004159561,0.000042180454,0.00014001796,0.00014081139,0.000056611985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917059,0.0058539608,0.0014137259,0.00031059582,0.00031562903,0.0004002591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013610868,0.0002954722,0.0002631392,0.00021032101,0.00027310595,0.00090600917,0.00014900875,0.0002734345,0.0024550906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012105311,0.00016222855,0.00017234447,0.00009735444,0.00050632405,0.0003626803,0.00059518096,0.0004601848,0.00024268014],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010882362,0.0027547164,0.25217313,0.0006937873,0.00037197894,0.0008389728,0.0381504,0.00050968403,0.6204299,0.00066681235,0.0007281501,0.07180024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009077469,0.0023230189,0.96829534,0.000044420907,0.00018328406,0.0002343481,0.0041867825,0.00083232234,0.022473585,0.00049424864,0.00080870424,0.000033222765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030361273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00053004606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0024550906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015171574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000110149536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008213103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921593027","doi":"10.1080/0163853x.2019.1581588","title":"Irony, Prosody, and Social Impressions of Affective Stance","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Prosody; Irony; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Social psychology; Computer science; Speech recognition","score_opus":0.012962234253737782,"score_gpt":0.3263103384720599,"score_spread":0.31334810421832215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921593027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99665904,0.000061009538,0.00019829946,0.000028452274,0.000006944339,0.0000107490205,0.000015032051,0.000007590772,0.0030129864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991129,0.000071526585,0.00026905132,0.00003148549,0.000011418765,0.000017554441,0.00002985479,0.000007857678,0.00044836092],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885654,0.00040987766,0.000056136236,0.000110642744,0.000460471,0.00010644072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944186,0.0025055385,0.0017347621,0.00024623808,0.000617218,0.00047763548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020319682,0.00055841234,0.00027723899,0.0011733208,0.0006586488,0.0018711997,0.0002439968,0.00060992455,0.002796232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009909196,0.00028958378,0.00031412186,0.00025551484,0.0013234699,0.00094520824,0.0013478211,0.0007881878,0.00025760627],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00382609,0.0012230778,0.43055302,0.00068874145,0.000692565,0.0016509605,0.21122651,0.0006233593,0.28925326,0.0017068996,0.0009042059,0.05765137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051973297,0.0008593053,0.9550843,0.00007058802,0.00008294877,0.0004031162,0.03679499,0.00062181446,0.004448553,0.00079732377,0.00070374314,0.00008136286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009037494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015238741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002796232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034346728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016289833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010746181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940027735","doi":"10.1080/0163853x.2019.1598167","title":"Challenges in Processes of Validation and Comprehension","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Comprehension; Misinformation; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Automaticity; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Variety (cybernetics); Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Cognition","score_opus":0.057065423785164396,"score_gpt":0.3557213650803197,"score_spread":0.2986559412951553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2940027735","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29564092,0.02452527,0.40250722,0.087925404,0.00075744704,0.00046646182,0.00024669885,0.0013971844,0.18653344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96495074,0.0019770141,0.028551646,0.00090148475,0.00028130942,0.00028179056,0.0000903638,0.0002581896,0.0027074155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9497985,0.036028612,0.002000533,0.0051597483,0.0056268754,0.0013857064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81505835,0.1486329,0.009271207,0.014725962,0.010715204,0.0015964039],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05348794,0.00071339955,0.0012783762,0.003282629,0.0026782064,0.014452,0.0033059635,0.0046621035,0.003912106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15598358,0.0009381473,0.00087218016,0.0022298566,0.043922756,0.026736977,0.00831561,0.0063110325,0.0010207074],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020609009,0.00008345427,0.008512933,0.0006217183,0.000053693922,0.00027481548,0.10812915,0.0013781097,0.002826057,0.73063797,0.0014995253,0.14577654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003424174,0.0000892793,0.0070031066,0.00046439658,0.0000249745,0.00031179196,0.012156671,0.0036129924,0.0024619712,0.95713884,0.01660211,0.000099603014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029904295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008952262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05348794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032368277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054606833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28287464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946907340","doi":"10.1080/0163853x.2019.1609742","title":"Distraction and Temporal Order in Narrative Situation Models","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Mind wandering and attention","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Distraction; Narrative; Task (project management); Cognitive psychology; Mind-wandering; Comprehension; Noise (video); Psychology; Computer science; Cognition; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03524527484993376,"score_gpt":0.30966845815903105,"score_spread":0.27442318330909726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946907340","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97656393,0.00040193094,0.01926486,0.000082318234,0.000015706397,0.000034638088,0.000034232584,0.000088219625,0.0035141062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99330187,0.00014624739,0.0060010995,0.000022155822,0.0000072871962,0.000028867993,0.00007948194,0.000021831307,0.0003910927],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978064,0.0009344759,0.0001707282,0.000396877,0.00060598005,0.00008561207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9779769,0.013715215,0.0041514845,0.0025264868,0.00091449195,0.0007153959],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002210671,0.00037422383,0.0002905232,0.00074545585,0.00042386254,0.002218619,0.000555504,0.0004586698,0.0015499413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03617217,0.00047784703,0.0004945615,0.0002608608,0.0011354013,0.0026145459,0.0017800295,0.00082902185,0.0001450231],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0056094625,0.0011982584,0.1103998,0.0016352038,0.000585498,0.0016348216,0.0738832,0.012323927,0.45803326,0.030348713,0.001314014,0.30303392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003336777,0.0038775105,0.6878275,0.0005615985,0.00056829763,0.0033045027,0.018145328,0.07638245,0.10193384,0.0914535,0.01509997,0.0005118394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009763495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011460634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002218619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072632555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004471317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011691332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003292801","doi":"10.1080/0163853x.2019.1700760","title":"Interpretation of Discourse Connectives Is Probabilistic: Evidence From the Study of <i>But</i> and <i>Although</i>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Speech and dialogue systems","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Interpretation (philosophy); Comprehension; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Meaning (existential); Linguistics; Probabilistic logic; Computer science; Natural language processing; Semantics (computer science); Logical connective; Relation (database); Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03827736900970941,"score_gpt":0.306500817544834,"score_spread":0.2682234485351246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003292801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9071995,0.0019470243,0.05533841,0.0023395931,0.000077494886,0.00013382881,0.00019338918,0.00013009414,0.032640584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924386,0.0004458834,0.0064452672,0.00019257497,0.00006002887,0.000056908335,0.00008616634,0.00006406363,0.00021058747],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98352283,0.009360581,0.0007956272,0.002662184,0.003278695,0.00038008092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.68724024,0.25783375,0.030167162,0.015254649,0.0082065165,0.0012975972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020799499,0.00059886475,0.0004950634,0.0012724585,0.0016417837,0.004203585,0.00138619,0.001616934,0.004479245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17964639,0.0011408253,0.00044859262,0.0011662479,0.0070390026,0.010129589,0.0039385767,0.0024870655,0.00055518775],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007853044,0.001209237,0.20454468,0.0053338944,0.0011479045,0.0017357827,0.1014361,0.007049702,0.17096926,0.21546926,0.0025561373,0.28069502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007934304,0.0016741818,0.4872041,0.0009527718,0.0010065008,0.0047360025,0.01580549,0.029759487,0.047680497,0.39179844,0.018163418,0.00042563176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014669389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011461311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020799499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007274408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009969833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1099996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170979526","doi":"10.1080/0163853x.2021.1924040","title":"Tense and Discourse Structure: The Timeline Hypothesis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Timeline; Linguistics; Computer science; Psychology; Discourse analysis; Natural language processing; Cognitive psychology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04003225172906693,"score_gpt":0.28853595645738817,"score_spread":0.24850370472832123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170979526","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86532825,0.0019019743,0.074039906,0.0019933195,0.00009498043,0.00025214336,0.00035710292,0.00033710373,0.055695105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867704,0.00037573726,0.010516479,0.0001393759,0.000066300505,0.00013016649,0.00021025455,0.000062686566,0.0017286164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846566,0.0005747559,0.0001081734,0.00051657204,0.00021352946,0.00012128348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98688215,0.007624993,0.0034144863,0.0010114198,0.0006253063,0.00044163121],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002560341,0.0005244041,0.00029518275,0.0012250195,0.0006746269,0.0025248386,0.0006016123,0.0010772347,0.008194534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014244224,0.0005570243,0.00042722767,0.000594555,0.0027203255,0.011286807,0.0014344048,0.00080266123,0.00079197745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004591544,0.000892551,0.1488393,0.001722933,0.0004101645,0.0018924385,0.09146486,0.0031141196,0.13525052,0.40107715,0.0024989112,0.2082455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008154016,0.0038760235,0.45749363,0.000759021,0.00041058645,0.003389376,0.026935287,0.01934018,0.036276493,0.40640655,0.043936115,0.00036121032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063065987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040413713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008194534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005709858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045312502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027413428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294647296","doi":"10.1080/0163853x.2022.2107859","title":"Given-New Effects on the Duration of Gestures and of Words in Face-to-Face Dialogue","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"University of Manchester","keywords":"Gesture; Dialogic; Duration (music); Face (sociological concept); Linguistics; Psychology; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Speech recognition; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.030223172370517214,"score_gpt":0.2875024357856155,"score_spread":0.2572792634150983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294647296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98892677,0.0003442544,0.0019107205,0.0000603346,0.000049683687,0.000048460985,0.00010343718,0.000088063214,0.008468378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99342334,0.00011978034,0.0040918062,0.00010248512,0.000037371294,0.0002121893,0.00011899201,0.00016015393,0.0017336912],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99761343,0.0010323367,0.00017295536,0.0005482743,0.0004950415,0.00013802781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9694473,0.025645025,0.0020140863,0.0014255747,0.00056497596,0.00090305594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019279125,0.00048223842,0.00051101943,0.00042969728,0.0005478977,0.0013564231,0.000478907,0.00069490686,0.0059442776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028747711,0.000444516,0.00027198705,0.00019521441,0.001038924,0.0017253072,0.0015187901,0.0008029145,0.00042501852],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012081588,0.0011183035,0.011895046,0.0012251638,0.00019626807,0.00057020143,0.023380913,0.0014245368,0.8534613,0.0037065065,0.00059140055,0.09034871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012247841,0.013177476,0.795091,0.00034655386,0.0005896628,0.0015850414,0.008951463,0.009481017,0.14856888,0.009269695,0.0113472855,0.00036716415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063673506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00095529895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059442776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004924001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023425574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0198856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386840004","doi":"10.1080/0163853x.2023.2255075","title":"Non-gendered pronoun processing: an investigation of the gender non-specific third person singular pronoun ‘TA’ in Chinese","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Gender Studies in Language","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Pronoun; Psychology; Operationalization; Sentence; Reading (process); Comprehension; Reading comprehension; Linguistics; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.05084935405160954,"score_gpt":0.3401779657252137,"score_spread":0.28932861167360413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386840004","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99936813,0.000031130305,0.00024296214,0.0000101822125,0.0000016111524,0.0000050415942,0.000010141027,0.000002465466,0.00032825972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99889225,0.000064539956,0.0006641696,0.000017719922,0.0000032338894,0.0000072898856,0.000035491983,0.0000059888152,0.00030932916],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998091,0.000036531837,0.000016325384,0.00006690835,0.00004673594,0.000024483992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988801,0.0005624302,0.00021923728,0.00009098644,0.00017587791,0.0000713625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055437186,0.00026663824,0.00027346474,0.00040329734,0.00047008466,0.0005226319,0.00023670882,0.00029694548,0.0012430447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022206763,0.00016113598,0.00017328685,0.00031225212,0.00064534997,0.00081980467,0.0003271489,0.00034366612,0.00016262395],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003754076,0.00012368595,0.048547734,0.0002668034,0.000030888332,0.0010308515,0.030611034,0.0001319744,0.90056694,0.0006926517,0.00006625131,0.017555732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035585865,0.0010321323,0.8385134,0.00002921917,0.0000774125,0.0016396083,0.021172406,0.002785143,0.13117567,0.0011446725,0.0023297,0.00006495515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052258093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069106906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052258093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003579654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006303876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0103907585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392897283","doi":"10.1080/0163853x.2024.2311637","title":"Idiom meaning selection following a prior context: eye movement evidence of L1 direct retrieval and L2 compositional assembly","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Literal and figurative language; Context (archaeology); Linguistics; Literal (mathematical logic); Selection (genetic algorithm); Meaning (existential); Computer science; Context effect; Verb; Psychology; Contrast (vision); Artificial intelligence; Natural language processing; History; Word (group theory)","score_opus":0.025879979987601467,"score_gpt":0.3552799646800409,"score_spread":0.3293999846924395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392897283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99633336,0.00011842168,0.0010584575,0.00003684872,0.0000034581212,0.000014552737,0.000075067015,0.000026663802,0.0023331116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99808913,0.000056310175,0.0012528885,0.00007377372,0.0000040268314,0.000024641513,0.000066308996,0.000017921835,0.00041501957],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99958545,0.00008580505,0.000024380548,0.00015741108,0.00008704141,0.000059980004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99685466,0.0017284012,0.000740263,0.00032835815,0.00024697548,0.00010134839],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075732975,0.00033086105,0.00031870976,0.00041088558,0.0003193363,0.0011584068,0.00025812772,0.0005741839,0.0035322807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007721259,0.0003794558,0.00020588959,0.0003087705,0.00059735926,0.0017065323,0.0010523294,0.0007038282,0.00044840065],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002353505,0.00018659519,0.068211526,0.00045473242,0.0000781552,0.0006279983,0.0114007685,0.0002211058,0.87827367,0.0012040266,0.00039810943,0.03658983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015299421,0.0004758349,0.9432303,0.000055025783,0.000090339534,0.0008865015,0.002391806,0.0015812921,0.048679113,0.0011355396,0.0012587104,0.00006258592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039484547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066258362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039484547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036238792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002867931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01181668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393853059","doi":"10.1080/0163853x.2024.2319898","title":"Selective View of the Last 50 Years of the Experimental Psycholinguistics of Idiom, Metaphor, and Irony: A Commentary","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Irony; Sarcasm; Psycholinguistics; Literal and figurative language; Metaphor; Linguistics; Psychology; Cognitive science; Cognition; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01795898410938557,"score_gpt":0.33651247824682967,"score_spread":0.3185534941374441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393853059","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026505525,0.00411502,0.00018953595,0.9224552,0.07161133,0.000004953003,0.000024073224,0.000014944554,0.0013199652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008064032,0.0046203,0.00039544387,0.7993895,0.18371484,0.000059287053,0.000016992797,0.00008976434,0.0036497512],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855978,0.0055016247,0.0010758779,0.0024819532,0.0043797675,0.00096301094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8835719,0.089033216,0.004808661,0.0019641812,0.016740195,0.003881879],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016486628,0.0012999987,0.0016515771,0.0024568897,0.00856999,0.008653646,0.006808428,0.030697694,0.0031430675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060494397,0.000673069,0.0014815362,0.0020274788,0.024295527,0.008689447,0.0043493495,0.052922096,0.001961878],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007495101,0.000017727356,0.00015086513,0.0003259271,0.00002376267,0.0003764176,0.003980269,0.000047310743,0.00028045033,0.01681301,0.9730671,0.0048421742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003264018,0.000048072856,0.00077374256,0.0010325857,0.000047792273,0.00039205045,0.005440297,0.00022267405,0.00051583425,0.015766738,0.97564244,0.000084982676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016281769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027424727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030697694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0084477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0086131655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08719069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395081293","doi":"10.1080/0163853x.2024.2337547","title":"The contributions of Walter Kintsch: Cascading cognitive science","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Comprehension; Cognition; Cognitive science; Representation (politics); Computer science; Empirical research; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017736860675550685,"score_gpt":0.38875018857914173,"score_spread":0.37101332790359104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395081293","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03695127,0.08375177,0.419543,0.2277589,0.0052509727,0.00012455792,0.00025906085,0.00076973805,0.22559077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7599898,0.02683639,0.16249582,0.012084062,0.0047813975,0.00033099926,0.00014164354,0.00056757353,0.03277235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964386,0.0018153408,0.000115377974,0.0006675078,0.00078698015,0.0001762335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98984045,0.007846985,0.00024664993,0.00075927965,0.0008864603,0.0004202338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004622639,0.0007499605,0.0007049758,0.0022816686,0.0020406079,0.004537415,0.0010330845,0.0021707905,0.0034968178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017598782,0.0006461993,0.00057681923,0.0014484932,0.01088182,0.009526205,0.0040614083,0.0049393657,0.00096331286],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025475481,0.00001851344,0.00046721892,0.00013998894,0.00003183579,0.00016632852,0.0029070866,0.0014311372,0.00029556346,0.95976204,0.01421136,0.020543503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067853207,0.000006282846,0.00015981495,0.0000554414,0.0000095930955,0.00013780683,0.0002598874,0.0016060564,0.00027970024,0.9543362,0.043116566,0.000025827681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030841187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018053107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004622639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002393131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014460792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024447143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407652482","doi":"10.1080/0163853x.2025.2462513","title":"Representing and remembering text paraphrases: a phantom recollection analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Recall; Computer science; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Discourse analysis; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03102178513511694,"score_gpt":0.3468820137749632,"score_spread":0.31586022863984625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407652482","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9582542,0.00012089935,0.03958979,0.000058573652,0.0000065672707,0.000048917955,0.000053592557,0.00010132934,0.0017662748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98501366,0.000059524107,0.014356896,0.000015542459,0.0000052485902,0.00004056111,0.0000670515,0.000021939835,0.00041937653],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906176,0.00037416763,0.00007940056,0.00020122598,0.00023288123,0.000050554612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.983337,0.01057587,0.0018574387,0.002849738,0.0011239004,0.00025603102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019521287,0.00031806444,0.00038816268,0.0010976107,0.00029792322,0.0011935937,0.00064995926,0.00037356996,0.002344447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021844685,0.00031958483,0.0002700491,0.0006387548,0.0008873009,0.0027079133,0.0010542851,0.0004791017,0.00022093747],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0043889633,0.00046006052,0.048083458,0.00081560545,0.0001664766,0.0014122443,0.032267094,0.003343249,0.68973595,0.015117925,0.00050521694,0.20370378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002468868,0.00539477,0.3523763,0.00018506104,0.0004494516,0.007771677,0.0130034685,0.08205361,0.49518323,0.035200685,0.007819041,0.00031584804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045652778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007273947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002344447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034004173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032900806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010323942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}