{"meta":{"query_hash":"5d3ca5eef7b7","filters":{"venue":"Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum"},"cohort_total":2,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":2,"exported":2,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/5d3ca5eef7b7","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Duke+Environmental+Law+%26+Policy+Forum"},"results":[{"id":"W1539981558","doi":"","title":"Address to the Environmental Regulation, Energy, and Market Entry Symposium","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum","topic":"Global Energy and Sustainability Research","field":"Energy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liquefied natural gas; Natural gas; Commission; Pipeline transport; Position (finance); Engineering; Business; Waste management; Finance; Environmental engineering","score_opus":0.0040681543458546635,"score_gpt":0.2198852048743858,"score_spread":0.21581705052853112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1539981558","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014466245,0.034145955,0.000242722,0.7881159,0.03295028,0.000029665629,0.00028570814,0.00006684646,0.14271627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.042153183,0.031239418,0.0005927639,0.2722938,0.07190846,0.00021701392,0.00037880667,0.00021591288,0.5810007],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967925,0.0007827245,0.00013154346,0.0005967274,0.0009985558,0.0006979744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978229,0.00093454256,0.00012340705,0.0001389587,0.0005013427,0.0004789142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046887184,0.001136655,0.0012227504,0.0014448081,0.007147038,0.01696603,0.002602007,0.033834152,0.064418584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063248356,0.00053713226,0.0021637587,0.0011554785,0.0037882405,0.009717264,0.0050293347,0.016107189,0.0181194],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018507691,0.0000678473,0.00016837493,0.000062392784,0.0000098825885,0.00016969243,0.00020359654,0.00006587975,0.00010687986,0.04907468,0.9429715,0.007080792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011125182,0.000011217464,0.00031915275,0.00019455292,0.000007983678,0.000028318935,0.00033704008,0.00007585163,0.0000598696,0.0073284227,0.9916128,0.000013706371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008170963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015173693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.064418584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007328486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009743389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2155016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1607065969","doi":"","title":"The Importance of Being Factual: The U.S., China, and the Future of the Kyoto Protocol","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ratification; Kyoto Protocol; China; Treaty; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Negotiation; Climate justice; International trade; Principal (computer security); Montreal Protocol; Political economy; Law and economics; Climate change; Law; Economics; Geography; Politics; Computer security","score_opus":0.0035841815322559655,"score_gpt":0.24876840254366284,"score_spread":0.24518422101140688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1607065969","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19521612,0.018542806,0.003903148,0.39808106,0.0017491202,0.00004431218,0.00019410523,0.000044946937,0.38222438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96733207,0.003358689,0.00061616907,0.019406065,0.0004558508,0.00003329487,0.00004539963,0.000019501498,0.0087329],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99430686,0.002975977,0.00014069577,0.0005291887,0.00112411,0.0009230861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960425,0.0020937342,0.00038101434,0.0004375637,0.00063180836,0.00041341264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0095497705,0.0002735826,0.00039591792,0.0012792137,0.012184728,0.013484206,0.0009916476,0.0047382307,0.003054195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009127491,0.00024270397,0.00027012636,0.0021584681,0.036317717,0.010083916,0.0038323833,0.006300249,0.00021924253],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017083186,0.000006813533,0.0012249779,0.000019282315,0.0000048070037,0.00007075451,0.005801897,0.00012411574,0.000056718967,0.9765455,0.008549975,0.007577929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002648932,0.000054208438,0.009740334,0.0005158763,0.0000394974,0.00010773688,0.019271567,0.0013615232,0.00055237266,0.72098494,0.24726476,0.00008060251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.066435106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0849684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.066435106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009929413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014676274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13209683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}