{"meta":{"query_hash":"01faf2ac840f","filters":{"venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law"},"cohort_total":20,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":20,"exported":20,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/01faf2ac840f","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Duke+journal+of+comparative+%26+international+law"},"results":[{"id":"W1494523486","doi":"","title":"Defendant Class Actions and the Right to Opt Out: Lessons for Canada from the United States","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Class (philosophy); Opt-out; Political science; Law; Action (physics); Certification; Opt-in email; State (computer science); Business; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.044019117962477754,"score_gpt":0.30584001703688674,"score_spread":0.261820899074409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1494523486","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20464471,0.00019638048,0.034222327,0.48923728,0.003382331,0.000593191,0.00036863566,0.000023812692,0.26733133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901112,0.000018556533,0.0001496565,0.00868949,0.0006763074,0.00001444443,0.000060450577,0.000006256294,0.00027368046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991965,0.000019186333,0.00028640823,0.000088276014,0.0002962625,0.000113317794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864525,0.00034511328,0.0002993067,0.00007893373,0.0006075609,0.000023809811],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019448558,0.00010198893,0.00016364611,0.000078201345,0.00040829266,0.00029672842,0.00030379317,0.00001659524,0.000078848294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004980498,0.000056351357,0.00008961369,0.0001372446,0.00012438884,0.00035366302,0.000056930123,0.00015729354,0.000010566599],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016172194,0.000039982406,0.000041431245,0.0000014520002,0.00019363133,0.0000018886451,0.0001976607,0.008895807,0.00003558224,0.96679693,0.023595361,0.000038564864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013443936,0.000008721283,0.0015835392,0.000036528134,0.00006716927,0.000006680435,0.0014501881,0.0028339967,0.00008368656,0.012998636,0.9795147,0.00007174218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07522128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46003366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9559194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013828238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000102813945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93093693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1501055903","doi":"","title":"Banking on Cooperation: The Role of the G-20 in Improving the International Financial Architecture","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Global Financial Regulation and Crises","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Corporate governance; Architecture; Financial crisis; Financial regulation; Global governance; Finance; Political science; Business; Economics; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.024397804667076285,"score_gpt":0.24708330499285483,"score_spread":0.22268550032577855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1501055903","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7203236,0.0011348723,0.001155488,0.007137929,0.002969357,0.0001983664,0.00008003593,0.0000036988472,0.26699662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980337,0.00001164309,0.00008894129,0.0009788421,0.0006358995,0.0000050832446,0.000003118725,0.000005179629,0.0002375822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998868,0.000050069273,0.0006658339,0.00009114766,0.00019186265,0.00013308185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987599,0.00014943272,0.00074623874,0.00013523716,0.00018588614,0.000023297664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069577683,0.00010564058,0.00020734633,0.00009206795,0.00013288086,0.00006976196,0.0007069386,0.00004171453,0.00020529385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016826084,0.00006048555,0.00016677407,0.00015051832,0.00012980933,0.00025704777,0.000081817765,0.00031852754,0.000019333616],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007551506,0.0000811634,0.017212475,9.926806e-7,0.000032570137,3.256735e-7,0.0010557495,0.0040955823,0.00027423416,0.976192,0.0003789728,0.0006004475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005119231,0.00005628328,0.097875714,0.00005071619,0.0000064185238,0.000025160472,0.00021508039,0.001751305,0.0030465575,0.048911296,0.8474442,0.0001053879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042114625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001306328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92728066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001262531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004860438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2466529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1505551132","doi":"","title":"Class Actions: The Canadian Experience","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Punitive damages; Damages; Political science; Civil procedure; Commission; Economic Justice; Law; Class (philosophy); State (computer science)","score_opus":0.07552962021589309,"score_gpt":0.3288667592884061,"score_spread":0.253337139072513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1505551132","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038971826,0.000057424993,0.0004925595,0.011779039,0.0014093298,0.000058396217,0.0000025032834,0.000010435008,0.9472185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927172,0.000018313205,0.000040005092,0.0041394387,0.0012435089,0.000006113374,0.000005078159,0.000005122961,0.0018252046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911207,0.000013227658,0.00028571603,0.00007718301,0.00036963573,0.00014219353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988637,0.000042961045,0.00030523216,0.00008818311,0.0006689299,0.000030982235],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016807289,0.00008970568,0.00011714501,0.00019283175,0.00042771563,0.00041295268,0.00040853067,0.000028279685,0.0011517652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028409646,0.00006284163,0.00011082788,0.00022963497,0.00013806895,0.0012418195,0.000032325897,0.00020824102,0.00024500204],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002550892,0.000043315948,0.0011796558,7.858456e-7,0.00005344616,0.00001181398,0.0001032053,0.00034062247,0.0000661312,0.98458153,0.013361603,0.00023236733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021595835,0.000006541915,0.006195536,0.000017687003,0.000014892294,0.000074354786,0.0009096993,0.0018655945,0.000023851388,0.001879685,0.98872584,0.000070375165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010677873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13870569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98270184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017760463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000080437036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512500917","doi":"","title":"Canada/United States Military Interoperability and Humanitarian Law Issues: Land Mines, Terrorism, Military Objectives and Targeted Killing","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Military and Defense Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International humanitarian law; Terrorism; Law; Political science; Geneva Conventions; International law; Municipal law; Human rights","score_opus":0.02247084032529224,"score_gpt":0.3083153047281898,"score_spread":0.28584446440289757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1512500917","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95502687,0.014632206,0.000032007698,0.0070961523,0.00044438543,0.00014210085,0.00011506738,0.000013879013,0.022497341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959228,0.0012109826,0.0006579631,0.0012119063,0.00053769734,0.0000031056784,0.000030186868,0.000007182442,0.0004181625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981238,0.00036960287,0.0005567822,0.0002224338,0.00050194294,0.00022539677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985115,0.00038873233,0.00013608554,0.000087442735,0.00070963404,0.00016663504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006380925,0.000198334,0.00040286372,0.00011381691,0.0008099866,0.000028835619,0.000230479,0.00004961017,0.00011865862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008127854,0.00016577616,0.000069579306,0.00010323601,0.00089217565,0.0006679922,0.00010220521,0.00024952926,0.0000011674881],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014238256,0.0005236205,0.028229197,0.0000639729,0.0016711799,0.0001096631,0.378481,0.0020150607,0.00026048906,0.56795025,0.01885512,0.00041661825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007032965,0.00021953351,0.010781571,0.00010412406,0.000042813168,0.000025805013,0.039821427,0.00086977636,0.00014227012,0.0039969934,0.9430497,0.00024266959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5780542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95100176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9241946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022800438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015595433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67601556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1515053903","doi":"","title":"Interoperability of United States and Canadian Armed Forces","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Military and Defense Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Infantry; General partnership; Terrorism; National security; Law; Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.036157243099489415,"score_gpt":0.341010317478981,"score_spread":0.30485307437949155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1515053903","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7766236,0.00039251082,0.000037665563,0.0036297368,0.00018049146,0.00004719876,0.000029649937,0.0000026761202,0.21905647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984029,0.00027939252,0.0003308502,0.0004081665,0.00017521656,7.939253e-7,0.0000051922075,0.0000019241154,0.00039558392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904794,0.00015441341,0.00033907025,0.000067665474,0.0002754439,0.00011546946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873173,0.00018374597,0.0001730054,0.000039299437,0.00074288424,0.00012933607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050674094,0.00006818583,0.00019863818,0.0001460499,0.0001757577,0.000025610103,0.00018062709,0.000023473678,0.0002540964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000769025,0.000054507924,0.00005822459,0.000094886236,0.00055897725,0.00031400908,0.000021709257,0.00011135759,0.0000036014749],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013245379,0.000057884903,0.0072323834,0.000003979964,0.00019830349,0.0000037301095,0.05035429,0.000409488,0.00005403976,0.9392737,0.0019495346,0.00033021564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003367316,0.00011796324,0.0064174873,0.00004405495,0.000014489665,0.0000063447746,0.015542812,0.0002728697,0.00037888152,0.0052510784,0.97154313,0.00007415891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04324054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44757023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9695936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012028305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011513656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9631306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1524727478","doi":"","title":"A Comparative Analysis of the Standard of Fraud Required Under the Fraud Rule in Letter of Credit Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Letter of credit; Payment; Issuer; Position (finance); Commission; Constructive fraud; Business; Law; Obligation; Scope (computer science); Securities fraud; Accounting; Law and economics; Economics; Actuarial science; Political science; Finance; Supreme court; Computer science","score_opus":0.0551072959462793,"score_gpt":0.3083150857105404,"score_spread":0.2532077897642611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1524727478","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58910763,0.00019337761,0.004784538,0.0032621033,0.0012443447,0.00021089944,0.000112289286,0.000004967225,0.40107986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976988,0.000007942761,0.00025356765,0.0015302215,0.0003350863,0.0000030852161,0.000012384341,0.000007060833,0.0001518856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974207,0.000116674695,0.0011613662,0.0001428967,0.0010142048,0.00014415079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99600536,0.00038259078,0.0018566244,0.00019777601,0.0015440081,0.000013657733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007331905,0.00017424164,0.0007405984,0.0003372541,0.00007676028,0.000068800335,0.0007683137,0.000052948453,0.0004558412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008577606,0.00010843216,0.00042610025,0.0005855717,0.001023231,0.00063524663,0.00009003235,0.00026521497,0.000004375179],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002856794,0.00021676098,0.0072437935,0.00001492357,0.0014483618,0.000002278164,0.00044975788,0.015798016,0.0009807245,0.9714306,0.00212525,0.0000038622115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0054034535,0.0002794601,0.13678317,0.0007017747,0.0019483512,0.000015828891,0.0046142214,0.010743558,0.035960168,0.21980521,0.5831069,0.00063791487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026094535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007780261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75162536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009012343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006210122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49911413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1528881838","doi":"","title":"Siting Foreign Law: How Derrida Can Help","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Judaism; Sociology; Law; Classics; History; Political science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.09109940972700245,"score_gpt":0.3394804521501871,"score_spread":0.24838104242318462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1528881838","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13981149,0.0000774755,0.0007858932,0.0022300137,0.00074265833,0.00007200667,0.000010037388,0.000014598703,0.8562558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963812,0.000027126649,0.00073970744,0.00052990636,0.0009967906,0.0000014875726,0.0000032292114,0.0000065282916,0.0013140099],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861395,0.00014390738,0.0003214335,0.0001027572,0.0006331375,0.00018478285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983997,0.000112706424,0.0004731219,0.00006275198,0.0008129412,0.00013881411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005833222,0.00010508584,0.00021321801,0.00008408455,0.00035777187,0.0001445193,0.00036856008,0.0000520072,0.0005283276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003217905,0.000094367264,0.00015724328,0.000082860155,0.00029557577,0.00059597543,0.000033134133,0.00021064466,0.000012432187],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005876473,0.00005881753,0.0012312599,0.0000011677851,0.00009894354,0.000019801184,0.0135323275,0.000009011969,0.00021974901,0.98389584,0.0006035467,0.00027076883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050298375,0.00016542405,0.0028759493,0.00006677405,0.000029203553,0.000037843634,0.007836765,0.00008399213,0.0029534611,0.023935262,0.9613614,0.00015092551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016134623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004275211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96075785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016031272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011472233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5784817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1544132179","doi":"","title":"Reconsidering Res Judicata: A Comparative Perspective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Res judicata; Scope (computer science); Doctrine; Law; Adversary; Political science; Action (physics); Law and economics; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.25700860748035,"score_gpt":0.3939149846991725,"score_spread":0.13690637721882254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1544132179","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.087434866,0.00072611426,0.00044003993,0.0011592264,0.0011834458,0.00013412756,0.000010222741,0.000019947922,0.90889204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971203,0.00006346333,0.00086813554,0.00022211886,0.00096945796,0.0000051223465,9.642333e-7,0.0000066331286,0.000743796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810976,0.00026614947,0.0005767279,0.0001663172,0.0006697603,0.00021128838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967309,0.000240178,0.0007434255,0.00008099315,0.002044062,0.00016041085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007542265,0.0001423962,0.0004301477,0.00015286323,0.00037589087,0.000121000594,0.0005201025,0.000062767394,0.00063706114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013533511,0.00012305187,0.00016344748,0.00019488385,0.00059348834,0.0010561311,0.000049860162,0.00030963746,0.000067004155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015957496,0.00011295559,0.0005525336,0.0000021062185,0.00023311186,0.00002284219,0.115311645,0.00001019461,0.00014285608,0.881342,0.0020805683,0.000029610734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075601065,0.00030764076,0.0019520317,0.00022293681,0.00005144505,0.000060173898,0.10289224,0.00002353521,0.005838765,0.09310542,0.7944976,0.00029216864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003624707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006595315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90968543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030432318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032668424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69753724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1566065845","doi":"","title":"HIV/AIDS and Blood Donation Policies: A Comparative Study of Public Health Policies and Individual Rights Norms","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Public health; Donation; Health policy; Political science; Right to health; Economic growth; Public policy; Public administration; Health care; Medicine; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.10441625188159497,"score_gpt":0.3760002981467664,"score_spread":0.2715840462651714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1566065845","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9296797,0.0013606562,0.00003231953,0.0029438424,0.00022318357,0.0002204069,0.000013918892,0.00001074226,0.06551525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99837214,0.00030633932,0.0002539751,0.00015208105,0.0002603957,0.000003167321,0.0000046515506,0.0000046069667,0.0006426414],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975455,0.0005116804,0.00066709396,0.00014606351,0.0009045431,0.00022515729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99786466,0.00033128608,0.00080484,0.00006688455,0.0007312706,0.00020104299],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089378166,0.00015495456,0.0004853771,0.00036552662,0.00049437967,0.00020336514,0.00032168272,0.00006496188,0.00011936488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037359685,0.00011675174,0.0000616823,0.00030340315,0.00065907446,0.0006273817,0.00006482819,0.0002727821,0.0000039508814],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002368451,0.0008572529,0.012089507,0.0000032608548,0.00060666504,0.0000034617512,0.49499547,0.000045087505,0.000027504198,0.49052742,0.0006684223,0.00015226172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006642661,0.0046854443,0.06805837,0.00030068404,0.0002341033,0.00013150364,0.56117696,0.0005239177,0.00051250384,0.009906874,0.34725595,0.0005710245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013303756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001475022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48062053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007890538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006742904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4760998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591907128","doi":"","title":"Lining-Up at the Border: Renewing the Call for a Canada-U.S. Insolvency Convention in the 21st Century","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Convention; International trade; Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.027603103053783114,"score_gpt":0.27681281337505614,"score_spread":0.24920971032127304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1591907128","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6044733,0.002212932,0.00014329805,0.029053833,0.0027401822,0.00054201356,0.000044280325,0.000008693682,0.36078146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924949,0.00013636985,0.0000130355675,0.0049429312,0.0010801165,0.00001690583,0.000020803778,0.000007337152,0.0012876353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986252,0.00004581804,0.00051515864,0.00011590635,0.00053628377,0.00016160136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853003,0.0002861047,0.00066709245,0.00013158262,0.00037667667,0.000008542183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072425016,0.00013202456,0.00017716379,0.000041632633,0.00033104655,0.00019242371,0.0007008816,0.00002711005,0.00035198923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048640144,0.00006924998,0.0001384521,0.00018205491,0.000100256424,0.00054937013,0.000048155645,0.00025925925,0.000012718655],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058690505,0.00012505242,0.002970897,0.000019957042,0.00012898076,0.000019731824,0.0010680327,0.0018106705,0.000075475116,0.9479608,0.040957537,0.0042759897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006666783,0.00002088476,0.009501521,0.00009799858,0.000028634708,0.000019366002,0.00075790304,0.00130548,0.0000399659,0.0027881418,0.9846835,0.00008989986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027903872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3273771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9451726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014263281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000113627204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9785694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1592699941","doi":"","title":"The NSA Phone Call Database: The Problematic Acquisition and Mining of Call Records in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Australia","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"United States National Security Agency; Government (linguistics); National security; Warrant; Call to action; Political science; Phone; Business; Computer security; Law; Advertising; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.07208240911005974,"score_gpt":0.37414700316749955,"score_spread":0.3020645940574398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1592699941","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98515344,0.000116899464,0.00040595862,0.012336438,0.000378379,0.00019120623,0.00004853971,0.0000023338987,0.0013667952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99821854,0.00009876373,0.00003191689,0.0013128357,0.0001811802,0.0000038507505,0.000017875747,0.0000037421034,0.00013128342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977701,0.0006040622,0.00056359987,0.000092018505,0.00073307316,0.00023715587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99650276,0.0024171977,0.0004413155,0.00011653777,0.00044817713,0.000073989235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002974461,0.000114016824,0.0001724483,0.00008306048,0.00042329406,0.00012511975,0.000581365,0.000034557714,0.000022264763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011280773,0.000052926967,0.000035353238,0.00029346894,0.0007747359,0.00018961033,0.00004505714,0.00034830833,5.3836993e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005774518,0.00017339595,0.009907194,0.000036441354,0.00031333367,0.00007186402,0.22330454,0.00060876645,0.00025886207,0.7463847,0.01806917,0.0002943276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001689925,0.0003525621,0.1449526,0.0010178211,0.00014490717,0.00017469452,0.33065015,0.004783703,0.00026533144,0.007488003,0.5081114,0.00036887583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33907017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.61263084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73889667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001412307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015874873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.665331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1593179291","doi":"","title":"The Priority Rules of the United Nations Receivables Convention","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accounts receivable; Convention; Bankruptcy; Debtor; International trade law; Law; Statutory law; Conflict of laws; Letter of credit; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Creditor; Finance","score_opus":0.07232836053494365,"score_gpt":0.2889957975240048,"score_spread":0.21666743698906113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1593179291","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15790819,0.000258527,0.001248453,0.010783411,0.0035041717,0.00018431983,0.000028295486,0.000015778041,0.8260689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963015,0.0001364699,0.0001476859,0.0005360255,0.00096475956,0.000002787551,0.00001309981,0.0000066430266,0.0018910506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852186,0.000044359316,0.0006027778,0.00008477623,0.00063831336,0.00010792543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996882,0.00032511642,0.0010324086,0.0001175392,0.0016318379,0.000011050681],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039358396,0.00010927102,0.00017054811,0.00034318957,0.00033172208,0.0002140462,0.0007244646,0.000034049277,0.0003122327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028212953,0.00006568503,0.000194131,0.00037287042,0.00053921546,0.00070249394,0.00008679059,0.00020103501,0.000043136308],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036698715,0.0001289169,0.0013657262,0.000008152533,0.00015023477,0.0000011448502,0.00008732207,0.00039825507,0.00017067268,0.98932374,0.0082520405,0.000077098804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005018583,0.000017782117,0.006878237,0.00009598809,0.000042862124,0.00001112729,0.00016456834,0.006411137,0.0005129497,0.044207077,0.9410763,0.0000801083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011603869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017575611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94511664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005779725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016265134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34187293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1594403803","doi":"","title":"The Law and Politics of the Pinochet Case","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Politics; Human rights; Jurisdiction; International law","score_opus":0.02956073755263248,"score_gpt":0.3427954605210797,"score_spread":0.3132347229684472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1594403803","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4532865,0.000093459625,0.000006701092,0.002349214,0.0003800012,0.000049437484,0.000014910792,0.0000020081684,0.54381776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98422986,0.000029352901,0.000063397456,0.0005791247,0.00053392665,0.0000010392619,6.773893e-7,0.0000032333942,0.014559375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986832,0.00018925042,0.00036899926,0.000063004576,0.0005742209,0.00012129169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985704,0.00035528705,0.00028995736,0.00007683749,0.0006463572,0.00006119213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045048466,0.000074081196,0.0001354312,0.000023623192,0.0008955397,0.00011577176,0.00044827323,0.000031557916,0.0004326515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019442725,0.000040665906,0.000115475705,0.000032740343,0.0011772809,0.00023574165,0.000028347898,0.00017839078,0.000008449655],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034232507,0.000036673693,0.000043863787,8.3248864e-7,0.00008418067,0.000024563267,0.003282634,0.00002555744,0.000020301271,0.99600214,0.0004041254,0.000040905907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023851969,0.000038703798,0.00030279445,0.000028986908,0.000015660118,0.00028481035,0.00037447622,0.000033597655,0.00058505783,0.24161974,0.7564288,0.00004886423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00077626336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042842873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75602466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000077694494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000095667485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6887858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130157079","doi":"","title":"Foreword: Debates Over Group Litigation in Comparative Perspective: What Can We Learn From Each Other","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Damages; Enforcement; Law and economics; Law; Business; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.05096546427562636,"score_gpt":0.28805598858852627,"score_spread":0.2370905243128999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130157079","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79676765,0.0041129487,0.0021331885,0.0019686532,0.0018798952,0.00021318879,0.00022576447,0.000011029319,0.19268769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972372,0.0005578313,0.00020110673,0.00052472163,0.00092262577,0.0000105885665,0.000029707342,0.000019105171,0.0004971162],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979852,0.000081260005,0.0012572561,0.00031575226,0.00012379912,0.00023675337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980404,0.00020306424,0.0012590217,0.00014084573,0.00024877096,0.00010794613],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048416972,0.00020019157,0.0008005514,0.00032299725,0.000095994095,0.00025819684,0.00040610397,0.00010113251,0.00096048927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024837735,0.00023742797,0.00022523441,0.00015454732,0.0002565561,0.001555121,0.00004278915,0.0003321547,0.00015033162],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001952677,0.00019134567,0.058809023,0.0000022470142,0.00029273867,0.000009923582,0.00922187,0.000674214,0.000048351445,0.9301194,0.0003797499,0.00005584815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003209248,0.00030106137,0.056866527,0.0003252511,0.000017218983,0.00003442175,0.0100076785,0.007282818,0.00041982293,0.63633204,0.28466257,0.0005413597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040065134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00643284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2937874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007708747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003496103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884602605","doi":"","title":"Best Interest of a Minor Theist: An American and Religiously Informed Response to Canada’s A.C. v. Manitoba","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Minor (academic); Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05154950500784888,"score_gpt":0.37081973341951163,"score_spread":0.31927022841166275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884602605","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7703505,0.000024885967,0.00016122924,0.0028711217,0.0004055937,0.00006736477,0.00006152633,0.0000032751516,0.22605446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996058,0.000013698561,0.0012225147,0.0014846063,0.0005207487,0.0000015089998,0.0000026764837,0.0000042642387,0.00069201476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985902,0.000209013,0.00043326104,0.000095468145,0.0005006956,0.00017138266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99740344,0.00046906032,0.0005737878,0.00008315965,0.0012017834,0.00026875536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039663125,0.00010393087,0.00026484465,0.000115022696,0.00019711858,0.000052661464,0.00038947217,0.000022504404,0.000052452368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028123852,0.000090994545,0.000049433296,0.00012720299,0.0019106833,0.00020711936,0.000046944715,0.00011700283,0.0000059944346],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008623681,0.000064290696,0.0017129292,0.0000014857928,0.000077728735,0.000012584591,0.004057491,0.000009247888,0.00029836813,0.99064606,0.0019469955,0.00031042064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023260771,0.0008225791,0.0038871935,0.000063045205,0.000016310109,0.000039805887,0.010877569,0.000007405847,0.0005685344,0.00051098684,0.9828652,0.0001087663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4174851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9348207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9901351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003464422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033621609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7039992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121682222","doi":"","title":"Are Muslims the New Catholics? Europe’s Headscarf Laws in Comparative Historical Perspective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Immigration; Political science; Population; Secularism; Sociology; Referendum; Politics","score_opus":0.14085115607918847,"score_gpt":0.3737837721688877,"score_spread":0.23293261608969923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121682222","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05900695,0.00078683527,0.000646446,0.0063367123,0.0014889172,0.00019738662,0.000005642282,0.000013259718,0.93151784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957071,0.00009432986,0.0003753831,0.000498713,0.00084683055,0.000004656367,0.0000014340138,0.000007369671,0.0024641731],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977699,0.00051168667,0.00054224505,0.00017183673,0.00078637013,0.0002179515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99717385,0.00024264847,0.000835427,0.00011253976,0.0014792988,0.0001562463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074011495,0.00015902214,0.00037090984,0.00018447542,0.000252555,0.00009394859,0.0007239029,0.0000629518,0.00015027945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016570142,0.00011511031,0.00016670447,0.00031781784,0.00040480812,0.00051927794,0.00005058112,0.00040338677,0.00004697987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015620519,0.000184526,0.0012383732,7.037183e-7,0.000051147337,0.000029401674,0.16901393,0.00006238589,0.00003616149,0.8141249,0.015073988,0.000028322056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015939163,0.00029869427,0.030553624,0.00011155381,0.000058577163,0.000054242057,0.10661481,0.00011421368,0.0005386236,0.106935926,0.75279194,0.00033385548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013948342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03238339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93670017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011909028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029334793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99261785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125255200","doi":"","title":"Shift Happens: Pressure on Foreign Attorney-Fee Paradigms From Class Actions","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Supreme court; Law; Government (linguistics); Political science; Liability; Civil procedure; Res judicata; State (computer science); Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.05653539633804575,"score_gpt":0.29704541234216847,"score_spread":0.24051001600412272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125255200","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016007666,0.00011139302,0.0025099346,0.0017571943,0.0015105632,0.00011486402,0.00003331629,0.000028448954,0.9779266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954339,0.000013401177,0.00019441145,0.0017685652,0.0012255807,0.000008359365,0.000034711527,0.000015339036,0.0013057023],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850667,0.00004071326,0.00050091423,0.00018541138,0.0005776625,0.00018864725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985835,0.00013686107,0.0006474016,0.00015215046,0.00044661053,0.000033496515],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020162895,0.0001976078,0.0002979103,0.00022616613,0.0002340435,0.00035248205,0.00036600998,0.00006754682,0.0018202097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000542396,0.00016959845,0.00024512035,0.00017588309,0.00010338839,0.0013309877,0.000036415844,0.00034944617,0.00046637302],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000121436555,0.0002917323,0.0008166328,0.0000042227502,0.00036709697,0.000009558481,0.00004147728,0.001679789,0.00014181524,0.98041016,0.016056059,0.0000600065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008375344,0.000033455774,0.004110417,0.000071566865,0.000096214615,0.000012255132,0.00023663307,0.0013232572,0.00024189334,0.019271916,0.9736002,0.00016462183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000077293866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015650086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97942626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000086512046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046434834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990923},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W7026896640","doi":"","title":"The Basis of Unit Self-Defense and Implications for the Use of Force","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"World Wars: History, Literature, and Impact","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Unit (ring theory); Set (abstract data type); Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.10596492253896475,"score_gpt":0.3763214579762302,"score_spread":0.27035653543726546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7026896640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7254988,0.0095882015,0.0051694238,0.023369605,0.0032192927,0.001075778,0.0004721135,0.000021109645,0.2315857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972004,0.0002016629,0.0007707376,0.00016237269,0.00030310464,0.000004563838,0.0000019324693,0.0000038155713,0.0013513883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910426,0.00014151927,0.0003348114,0.00004367169,0.00025369486,0.000122046775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99661154,0.0018269126,0.00053268264,0.000090593996,0.0008680136,0.000070285525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071351515,0.00006569154,0.00015087088,0.000050499046,0.00038616123,0.00006406154,0.00029093266,0.000026052487,0.000016978105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015198138,0.000037960253,0.000121006284,0.00009965374,0.00041374736,0.0005088394,0.00001844464,0.000104983716,5.7427906e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083679646,0.00006478369,0.004754215,0.0000021536605,0.00016587852,3.9032365e-8,0.013463047,0.000026602178,0.00018849943,0.97624236,0.0047880188,0.00022069133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024312006,0.00007491264,0.024125846,0.000022417107,0.000053387463,0.0000061286346,0.0012372363,0.000055742043,0.00035605027,0.003878776,0.969901,0.000045350833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007584428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002886806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9723636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000066952365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009672673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2970079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W82930102","doi":"","title":"MISPLACED BOLDNESS: THE AVOIDANCE OF SUBSTANCE IN THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE'S KOSOVO OPINION","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; International court; Political science; International law; Independence (probability theory); Public international law","score_opus":0.04087776638970086,"score_gpt":0.3618997799491497,"score_spread":0.3210220135594488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W82930102","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64275044,0.00031727675,0.00115661,0.01899206,0.0023944378,0.00033827583,0.00006139275,0.000005028522,0.3339845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979625,0.00016981798,0.00044340472,0.00063308445,0.0003960249,0.000009473827,0.00000568799,0.0000052002547,0.00037483854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972066,0.0004023311,0.00078381476,0.00010918337,0.0012996987,0.00019832692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960152,0.0013816601,0.00082640204,0.00014057315,0.0015740814,0.00006208478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014486171,0.00012170403,0.00029633666,0.000097724114,0.00012039545,0.0000805597,0.0015982707,0.00005761771,0.00027852028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028062868,0.0000769095,0.00015295036,0.00020853496,0.0008394669,0.0005648976,0.000037655795,0.00035323264,0.000015263398],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009655021,0.00017687073,0.001555743,0.000008751374,0.00008220923,0.0000022406075,0.011194912,0.0004576584,0.00062956766,0.9838733,0.0018672927,0.000054882494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033146197,0.00043102063,0.09977343,0.0010255316,0.00012729986,0.0000886787,0.060717583,0.011077202,0.00253994,0.16757548,0.65281713,0.0005120805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006716868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015649908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8162978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001650842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018813435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31362784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W896809431","doi":"","title":"A State’s Right to Military Power: The International Legal Implications of Potential SDF Action","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Military and Defense Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; State (computer science); Guard (computer science); Use of force; Political science; Rules of engagement; Power (physics); International law; Proportionality (law); Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.030562137490161484,"score_gpt":0.3485913024835739,"score_spread":0.3180291649934124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W896809431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5926822,0.00028016794,0.001923798,0.035111208,0.0020966837,0.00028421837,0.00007289212,0.000011707267,0.36753714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964304,0.000096659875,0.0005833844,0.0007672098,0.00045300872,0.0000151608,0.000006132145,0.000004642359,0.0016434048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981878,0.00018165713,0.00057980244,0.00012969384,0.00075966597,0.00016137758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99750566,0.00023323555,0.00030346218,0.00011565147,0.0017339997,0.000107984655],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046542747,0.00011445961,0.0002236387,0.00013819116,0.0003560645,0.00006303512,0.0007103349,0.000032968834,0.0015509739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008720482,0.000081095546,0.00019674623,0.00015118324,0.00038873559,0.0008128201,0.00009034935,0.00020659906,0.00008250535],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002032464,0.00020436135,0.0008517734,0.000001989965,0.0004878376,0.000004545489,0.011514425,0.0010744198,0.0040818644,0.93639004,0.04482225,0.00036326813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044473208,0.00020224178,0.0346135,0.00003794895,0.00003027793,0.000038419304,0.011537176,0.00011055914,0.0015033003,0.02869312,0.9226432,0.00014554271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022868586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039024355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9076969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015816976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013934152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99936175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}