{"meta":{"query_hash":"6acc67146074","filters":{"venue":"EFSA Journal"},"cohort_total":53,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":53,"exported":53,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/6acc67146074","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=EFSA+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W2149663051","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3854","title":"Scientific Opinion on the pest categorisation of Rhagoletis cingulata (Loew)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Insect behavior and control techniques","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhagoletis; PEST analysis; Biology; European union; Tephritidae; Crop; Pest control; Integrated pest management; Toxicology; Agroforestry; Ecology; Horticulture; Business; International trade","score_opus":0.023056649162181853,"score_gpt":0.22529880354568246,"score_spread":0.2022421543835006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149663051","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0069371895,0.28029868,0.005123941,0.54735684,0.08821755,0.00024515437,0.0030224565,0.00016447589,0.06863374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13713227,0.29713503,0.011735023,0.41063207,0.074786775,0.0010377939,0.00814713,0.00019175006,0.05920215],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99023485,0.0021017466,0.0013114882,0.0012598556,0.0044243843,0.0006677805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9592237,0.009615472,0.0046188897,0.001079756,0.023560524,0.0019016088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023587583,0.00092629396,0.0011447498,0.0031737266,0.0015058754,0.004435323,0.003519973,0.010598678,0.0045105633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019649709,0.00046268277,0.001536716,0.0026791426,0.0030192523,0.0028628348,0.0021145581,0.008160512,0.0032165362],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040245752,0.00016589473,0.0052475417,0.005671963,0.00014198553,0.00030200483,0.00089175417,0.0006281269,0.008763566,0.023778103,0.58306336,0.3709432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029226323,0.00015665378,0.008711056,0.004711378,0.00011041202,0.00017450063,0.00055106566,0.00017631747,0.000938777,0.005227339,0.9791747,0.000038562197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009047694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004988621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023587583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033236283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064605996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.124744534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337151763","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3914","title":"Scientific Opinion on the pest categorisation of Rhagoletis ribicola","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Insect behavior and control techniques","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhagoletis; European union; PEST analysis; Biology; Quarantine; Tephritidae; Ribes; Ecology; Botany; Business; International trade","score_opus":0.02298719840994123,"score_gpt":0.22466653237332715,"score_spread":0.20167933396338592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337151763","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009878365,0.39094502,0.007912545,0.428072,0.08578283,0.00020628679,0.0031458205,0.00019945647,0.07385764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15541336,0.3654139,0.013322691,0.3201891,0.07666524,0.0006811956,0.0078045162,0.00019500895,0.060315024],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927711,0.0014305672,0.0011812096,0.0010928502,0.003014863,0.0005094053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9618613,0.008617284,0.00466087,0.0010733816,0.022215264,0.0015719549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018313492,0.00094021484,0.0012212355,0.0033989698,0.0013597376,0.0038386197,0.003082905,0.00833311,0.0046130065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014530485,0.00040989183,0.0013906386,0.002527458,0.0034473243,0.0033253853,0.0017795543,0.006659806,0.0040229345],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005188363,0.00016814096,0.006433916,0.0071798456,0.00014591409,0.00036296804,0.0010474431,0.0008326293,0.010451837,0.023042189,0.40262002,0.5471962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028306118,0.00019461627,0.010776866,0.005888889,0.00011483467,0.0003257553,0.000669153,0.0002562766,0.001026386,0.0067531327,0.97391576,0.00005005262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008196933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004822933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018313492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002806593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047185863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09685218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2347205429","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3926","title":"Scientific Opinion on the pest categorisation of Atropellis spp","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Forest Insect Ecology and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; PEST analysis; European union; Introduced species; Botany; Ecology","score_opus":0.012134995047457586,"score_gpt":0.21456358985038468,"score_spread":0.2024285948029271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2347205429","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009891377,0.4294976,0.0082066115,0.3899268,0.08138339,0.00022424216,0.004081857,0.00026853246,0.076519534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1299203,0.4268901,0.016844852,0.27822766,0.061488464,0.00067228626,0.01044318,0.00020354561,0.07530964],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934411,0.0010918616,0.0009228375,0.0009046733,0.0031255803,0.00051396276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.966229,0.006126877,0.0030905453,0.0008602842,0.022357656,0.0013356879],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01485237,0.00091535685,0.0011559024,0.0029422417,0.0010191964,0.0035690658,0.002521707,0.0075970567,0.006179074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011322291,0.00036536372,0.0013425696,0.0022081858,0.0022017634,0.00254588,0.0014091555,0.005973786,0.003945995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045940254,0.00020106266,0.0057230084,0.0068018558,0.00017603888,0.00047229274,0.000580469,0.0005873702,0.012881056,0.016578024,0.4299329,0.5256065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028845738,0.00015061164,0.009418608,0.0038720998,0.00011608857,0.0003337042,0.0004571634,0.00017149842,0.0014901123,0.004266331,0.9796545,0.0000402931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037871175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01485237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024551302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050924565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.078547776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2399502854","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2010.e831","title":"Editorial: The new EFSA Journal web area","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Agricultural safety and regulations","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Office of the Chief Medical Examiner","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Web site; World Wide Web; Computer science; The Internet","score_opus":0.0074748506306513045,"score_gpt":0.20944840356429897,"score_spread":0.20197355293364766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2399502854","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004951093,0.0017753373,0.00009424339,0.025499018,0.9697462,0.000023774393,0.00006501743,0.00004566105,0.002701229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007187816,0.0022866044,0.00014093926,0.02104295,0.9467686,0.0000308758,0.00008942135,0.00006164142,0.028860312],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99451834,0.0006810364,0.00062053977,0.00059878756,0.0031632574,0.00041801034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9757662,0.0055480734,0.0020902406,0.0006345526,0.012626363,0.003334568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006929258,0.003909747,0.003936316,0.0062064747,0.00328678,0.008658295,0.0036038714,0.016806342,0.025390526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025360633,0.0011893134,0.0026874002,0.0019535879,0.0021265794,0.00394059,0.0015965193,0.014780269,0.020589089],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043855336,0.000020213847,0.000026348067,0.00009481673,0.000012379205,0.00010374109,0.00000497455,0.00002011554,0.000065722306,0.000107241096,0.9963355,0.003164996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000087137465,0.000042878066,0.0005501593,0.0002756544,0.00006786065,0.00022069475,0.000035444125,0.00028281394,0.00021339572,0.0006418989,0.99755955,0.000022548571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023864282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006885157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025390526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032572902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033159067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08493978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793372631","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5184","title":"Pest categorisation of Anisogramma anomala","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Insect-Plant Interactions and Control","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Art history; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.014486195087143812,"score_gpt":0.23043066082740124,"score_spread":0.21594446574025744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793372631","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7178986,0.009116169,0.009206051,0.0015237408,0.00042282377,0.0061497297,0.10403722,0.0009771145,0.15066844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8536948,0.003781717,0.023268964,0.0012644234,0.000114670074,0.0013364261,0.08817974,0.000109232635,0.02825008],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908257,0.00015034318,0.00014497548,0.0001301628,0.0003373579,0.00015451337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884015,0.000121535806,0.00031378632,0.00009006039,0.0005404348,0.000094072275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011598069,0.0005998774,0.00033631723,0.0040650186,0.00040079138,0.00051544403,0.00043985154,0.00039321798,0.009299002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010818065,0.00009279025,0.00052524154,0.0012917805,0.00020097579,0.00041676676,0.00062528794,0.0002752542,0.0021268579],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002991278,0.0006895486,0.4014132,0.0034889916,0.00023173525,0.0020950136,0.0026417125,0.0024273468,0.17671488,0.0044340272,0.06682784,0.3360444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037349946,0.0011708839,0.8301636,0.0004453663,0.00009254096,0.0011109932,0.00170402,0.0010373972,0.0074329763,0.00061094284,0.15614398,0.000049978033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011344016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0148505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011344016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000754731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006063929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03110826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809587194","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5300","title":"Pest categorisation of non‐EU Pissodes spp.","year":2018,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Forest Insect Ecology and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Curculionidae; PEST analysis; Quarantine; Bark beetle; European union; Bark (sound); Botany; Deciduous; Longhorn beetle; Larva; Pupa; Ecology; Horticulture","score_opus":0.008496944788362925,"score_gpt":0.24076763744281185,"score_spread":0.2322706926544489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809587194","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83766145,0.019622903,0.0084950505,0.0013034752,0.0008044329,0.0035805425,0.03504922,0.0003875213,0.093095385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9107364,0.009094856,0.014680657,0.001226048,0.00015148084,0.0011271237,0.037590936,0.000042984288,0.0253496],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944717,0.000074684554,0.0000828043,0.000077768,0.00020256749,0.000115000315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989447,0.00010042381,0.0002636038,0.000048591988,0.0005443028,0.00009835502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010500246,0.0006848224,0.00033183148,0.0024866527,0.00035602954,0.00040629375,0.00042450932,0.0003443371,0.0032916698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006408912,0.000120905075,0.000580579,0.0010432751,0.00020685336,0.00039253655,0.00063921214,0.0003205674,0.0010605353],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018168179,0.00043008217,0.5356709,0.0035364507,0.00027495637,0.0011167313,0.001815305,0.0012613892,0.06213043,0.0016852038,0.029889373,0.36037236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004414192,0.0010013906,0.89764094,0.0005993361,0.00014212664,0.0009800877,0.0010870972,0.0008516432,0.003960698,0.00034041842,0.093317084,0.000035054396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075277826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012995726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075277826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041811238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048870745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014967918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2880032881","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5345","title":"Technical Note on the quality of DNA sequencing for the molecular characterisation of genetically modified plants","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council; European Commission; European Food Safety Authority","keywords":"Insert (composites); Context (archaeology); DNA sequencing; European commission; Biotechnology; Genetically modified organism; Reference genome; Computational biology; Biology; Genetics; DNA; Engineering; European union; Business; Gene","score_opus":0.10156690642728669,"score_gpt":0.3277787624586173,"score_spread":0.22621185603133062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2880032881","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026531737,0.0060911104,0.7414203,0.040722445,0.017236983,0.013296097,0.014845639,0.011161457,0.12869433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.077495225,0.011128882,0.6504651,0.023771971,0.003955256,0.018527176,0.0365626,0.0067302743,0.17136353],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.93269444,0.021976106,0.010951286,0.004682865,0.02748169,0.002213639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8378702,0.05872791,0.010978788,0.023626216,0.066841856,0.0019549942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.047955032,0.0015002827,0.0014777249,0.005053672,0.0031484328,0.0049158097,0.0032031531,0.0077603343,0.02319022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09912422,0.001875257,0.0018977381,0.00165912,0.0036369925,0.0027295905,0.0029214574,0.0061059017,0.04808794],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013663116,0.0006169939,0.0033784078,0.004797749,0.00011431479,0.0036155574,0.0036812867,0.0028585817,0.25894937,0.032089714,0.420402,0.26812968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008826987,0.00057461124,0.003189269,0.003019112,0.00011517504,0.0025449414,0.00047697334,0.0016836844,0.13089293,0.0057684123,0.85148674,0.00015983396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020085492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028199675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047955032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019166315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009313791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25361353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909859134","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5513","title":"Pest categorisation of Pseudopityophthorus minutissimus and P. pruinosus","year":2019,"lang":"ca","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Research on scale insects","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"PEST analysis; Chemistry; Biology; Botany","score_opus":0.014898438920030923,"score_gpt":0.24372656011414792,"score_spread":0.228828121194117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2909859134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877823,0.000705012,0.0010953806,0.00010091335,0.000030225798,0.00027216168,0.0024418063,0.000042146694,0.0075300056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98832846,0.00043357408,0.003234569,0.00012763648,0.000018303448,0.00015766382,0.0035197344,0.000010277335,0.0041697766],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997149,0.000056117966,0.000035042114,0.000065361244,0.0000773489,0.000051260762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999461,0.000066249726,0.0001501651,0.000025777144,0.0002087906,0.00008815181],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045141001,0.0004290389,0.00021412854,0.0010166072,0.00025318607,0.0002862222,0.00021589281,0.00021091099,0.0026640957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006217592,0.00010520601,0.00035733238,0.00035581106,0.00013535522,0.00021662522,0.00046652713,0.00021131821,0.0006801903],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010577195,0.00019212783,0.8329493,0.0005290587,0.00014394212,0.0006027592,0.001231454,0.000697594,0.06213299,0.00014158257,0.0027410754,0.0975805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011027721,0.0005131101,0.9891661,0.000067663685,0.000054071093,0.00063411536,0.00057363434,0.00094081357,0.0035786955,0.00004632631,0.004404142,0.0000103170505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061889123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014914327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061889123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021785121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001941852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012305737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2920583144","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5617","title":"Pest categorisation of Arrhenodes minutus","year":2019,"lang":"lt","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Research on scale insects","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"PEST analysis; Biology; Zoology; Food science; Botany","score_opus":0.031112796760564804,"score_gpt":0.2631353587748391,"score_spread":0.23202256201427432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2920583144","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9711906,0.0048060725,0.0017852706,0.00035327885,0.000117678006,0.00079960853,0.0049070865,0.00011897264,0.015921522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9753025,0.002464077,0.005301095,0.00044067166,0.00007041694,0.0003889548,0.007339448,0.00002268843,0.008670111],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994935,0.00010010653,0.00007324802,0.00010836119,0.000138234,0.000086519234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907553,0.000088759996,0.0002823069,0.00003755504,0.00041426063,0.000101652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008130043,0.00050610234,0.00029588715,0.0017127076,0.00034802168,0.00031337704,0.00029605813,0.0002686265,0.0027691228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006923919,0.00009986592,0.0003977421,0.00056218076,0.00015137355,0.00027082494,0.00045707883,0.00024132642,0.0007165747],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00164843,0.0002737124,0.7541233,0.0011202014,0.0001414198,0.0008524103,0.0014470584,0.00081442273,0.08309524,0.0003455732,0.00521909,0.15091906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001668448,0.0011680983,0.9784016,0.00023971258,0.00006482936,0.0011261777,0.00069457665,0.0005942712,0.0044324114,0.00009191458,0.013150188,0.00001963952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007182548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0147927925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007182548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038204383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027550047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014281452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2937027379","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5660","title":"Setting an import tolerance for 2,4‐D in soyabeans","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metabolite; Residue (chemistry); Biotechnology; Biology; Agricultural science; Biochemistry","score_opus":0.02004021530721093,"score_gpt":0.26463646080203634,"score_spread":0.24459624549482542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2937027379","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9683574,0.0006806457,0.022776118,0.0004533529,0.00008138194,0.00060129736,0.0011538084,0.00030968845,0.0055863825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95147437,0.00056976406,0.03863831,0.00050609506,0.000019401808,0.00086081045,0.0012468462,0.00011943268,0.006564975],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973018,0.0009495292,0.0002494204,0.00036669613,0.00090525846,0.0002273391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99797803,0.0005017528,0.0005041843,0.00036746988,0.0005627898,0.00008578749],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026994199,0.0004986668,0.00035877235,0.00061132805,0.0006610435,0.0008760423,0.0007116724,0.0012907708,0.0012496368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022846076,0.00038042944,0.0005466518,0.00036939554,0.0006749166,0.00031515255,0.0007293233,0.00087713473,0.00049632986],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003333432,0.000092850045,0.0016728493,0.00009151757,0.000009350125,0.00006948718,0.00016031135,0.00054579385,0.99399686,0.00046036622,0.0002144436,0.0023528393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003775597,0.0011451339,0.007076576,0.00004130508,0.000026688895,0.00010814333,0.00013289772,0.00097332196,0.9821346,0.000219081,0.008078586,0.000026010473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034853497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005256131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0034853497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087725424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012217113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014276087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2957606809","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2019.e170704","title":"Managing evidence in food safety and nutrition","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Research Data Management Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Ottawa","funders":"U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Food safety; Interoperability; Session (web analytics); Scientific evidence; Business; Risk analysis (engineering); Risk management; Computer science; Biology; Food science","score_opus":0.09363387886976851,"score_gpt":0.35165015852805837,"score_spread":0.2580162796582899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2957606809","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010132291,0.2231429,0.114719786,0.60063344,0.005460561,0.0019415427,0.00063934125,0.00035060017,0.042979535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26855218,0.18526238,0.48004243,0.046339985,0.008273855,0.004504088,0.00089415687,0.0002896658,0.0058412096],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.49564716,0.36933523,0.05695426,0.013758912,0.060324233,0.0039802133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.15683825,0.7391713,0.027765803,0.028374132,0.04015569,0.0076947347],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.40512103,0.0015469939,0.0061733993,0.037570152,0.009188253,0.05275592,0.009089966,0.01458963,0.0051095802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.58192927,0.0025760185,0.002913102,0.026771722,0.025890794,0.04056515,0.032653335,0.014172865,0.0015305832],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001881176,0.00024111682,0.0041454174,0.019926054,0.0012745201,0.0007180955,0.029717151,0.0024361007,0.0007750537,0.27040285,0.046242755,0.6239328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017187536,0.0002251853,0.0027896825,0.042920955,0.00040984523,0.000575428,0.017066533,0.0026047325,0.0013730918,0.6584371,0.27323428,0.00019139407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038846203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044066915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.594879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02157241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06922059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7335917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2960634915","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2019.e170707","title":"Conducting fit‐for‐purpose food safety risk assessments","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Food Inspection Agency","funders":"","keywords":"Food safety; Agency (philosophy); Food inspection; Political science; Management; Library science; Sociology; Medicine; Social science; Economics","score_opus":0.12009201491730244,"score_gpt":0.3218922221959085,"score_spread":0.2018002072786061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2960634915","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058616314,0.010976902,0.5844745,0.109693445,0.008860517,0.037684422,0.004206484,0.0036572684,0.18183027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2436319,0.008943642,0.6907856,0.011278022,0.0018362976,0.013952647,0.0022855217,0.0014128941,0.025873538],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.79377025,0.14491516,0.009431252,0.0082476325,0.036394518,0.0072411713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.68349737,0.18138348,0.019963676,0.030738859,0.07423511,0.010181511],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.24670914,0.00244201,0.0024047627,0.0050051194,0.0066123228,0.01726756,0.0068402947,0.011014526,0.019044949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.255356,0.0019611965,0.003334494,0.0032319466,0.0039377576,0.014662738,0.01818623,0.011843071,0.009108131],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017256397,0.0021436838,0.0145078385,0.009477691,0.0010022846,0.0015618278,0.042133447,0.019569581,0.014525778,0.07053846,0.16965333,0.65316045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030925282,0.0013939649,0.008731641,0.006704975,0.000268205,0.00037867329,0.028835673,0.010589774,0.017460575,0.1705278,0.7542761,0.0005234115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036327282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006439176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24670914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0083204275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036831852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9289417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2960707212","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2019.e170718","title":"Responding to globalised food‐borne disease: risk assessment as post‐normal science","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Unintended consequences; Context (archaeology); Globalization; Business; Food security; International trade; Disease; Public economics; Economics; Political science; Medicine; Agriculture; Psychology; Biology; Social psychology; Market economy","score_opus":0.013613036693829624,"score_gpt":0.27981429769123856,"score_spread":0.26620126099740893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2960707212","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018947758,0.11063271,0.27513567,0.50127363,0.006558419,0.0006797159,0.00020348796,0.00037962975,0.08618893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6487605,0.0931453,0.20377028,0.037337873,0.009020444,0.0008947392,0.0001621741,0.0001538287,0.006754851],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.91946816,0.060905993,0.0033914554,0.0033426925,0.011656929,0.0012347327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7871977,0.16961524,0.011731542,0.011907512,0.016102891,0.0034451138],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13175999,0.0019836568,0.0026706185,0.0068654455,0.0032672521,0.024256254,0.0044301716,0.009004757,0.0035949037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.109280884,0.00081963337,0.0012461512,0.0035223789,0.07011064,0.029183088,0.01249663,0.016716762,0.0008426812],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000113245485,0.00021674183,0.004695787,0.002628003,0.00016975941,0.0004795992,0.013066014,0.004733465,0.00076107663,0.7983212,0.010675541,0.16413961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011805336,0.00017960204,0.0013069528,0.0022204123,0.000034592846,0.00031825007,0.008228225,0.0024923396,0.00033144315,0.92128646,0.06349759,0.000092395494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022181123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023167294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9967328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0102675455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013853529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69682175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2961589517","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2019.e170719","title":"Integrating nutrition science and consumer behaviour into future food policy","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Culinary Culture and Tourism","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"European Food Safety Authority","keywords":"Food science; Business; Marketing; Biotechnology; Biology","score_opus":0.009266030601298722,"score_gpt":0.23281915467926595,"score_spread":0.22355312407796724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2961589517","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01327871,0.026197556,0.004771413,0.8971572,0.00427917,0.000044212222,0.000082086284,0.00003680261,0.054152895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71168345,0.07648537,0.014411314,0.16782108,0.0069290106,0.00039829995,0.00020274182,0.00010543386,0.021963283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925977,0.0056640655,0.00014292831,0.00024908106,0.0006557413,0.0006903937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9826502,0.013013716,0.0007308402,0.0003724078,0.0018161682,0.0014165965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021469975,0.000542142,0.0008292276,0.0013075417,0.0030068834,0.013843786,0.001252202,0.009066207,0.009683116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021242604,0.00034775402,0.00065833033,0.0015271135,0.010099421,0.012030173,0.0046756314,0.007854514,0.0009069333],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011891666,0.00038086672,0.005517853,0.0014799678,0.000105996995,0.00027118478,0.028755955,0.0028091497,0.0005885188,0.60898054,0.16865622,0.18233477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022144604,0.00009122023,0.005306316,0.0026855336,0.000023137338,0.00005739641,0.035910197,0.0018572768,0.00028121856,0.5771483,0.37654567,0.00007165648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058857063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006774023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021469975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007511996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008392552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11354548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964063645","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5759","title":"Modification of the existing maximum residue levels and setting of import tolerances for oxathiapiprolin in various commodities","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Agricultural safety and regulations","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Residue (chemistry); Enforcement; Business; Agricultural science; China; Risk assessment; Biotechnology; Environmental science; Computer science; Chemistry; Biology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03533272730241994,"score_gpt":0.2468713717814146,"score_spread":0.21153864447899468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964063645","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79691434,0.00238215,0.08360373,0.00179504,0.00057174946,0.003957224,0.005738283,0.0011734044,0.10386423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86409825,0.0012619672,0.09215576,0.0015780655,0.000121003875,0.0039012134,0.0045473687,0.00031239155,0.032023937],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98267984,0.0042037684,0.0020946455,0.0022133235,0.007490634,0.001317752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98859775,0.0033460942,0.0018406177,0.0017931098,0.0042388057,0.00018365768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014370904,0.00076979125,0.0006028736,0.0020923864,0.0014078806,0.0025937103,0.0024117804,0.003183497,0.0037025532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013719842,0.00067366,0.0014059043,0.0014139607,0.0018175971,0.0016138232,0.0015725753,0.0022184069,0.0015457975],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036407467,0.0017265753,0.043737847,0.0025715104,0.00018323112,0.003067065,0.006802725,0.016833467,0.6997989,0.03346884,0.017965285,0.17020398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029737552,0.005627605,0.08973304,0.0013777341,0.0003870933,0.002192073,0.002065243,0.009162511,0.6555991,0.008389954,0.22476014,0.00040818306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045703813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055966587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014370904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00219142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033731177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.076001525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035943817","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6133","title":"Setting of import tolerances, modification of existing maximum residue levels and evaluation of confirmatory data following the Article 12 MRL review for flupyradifurone and DFA","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Agricultural safety and regulations","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"European commission; Agricultural science; European union; Residue (chemistry); Biotechnology; Toxicology; Mathematics; Business; Biology","score_opus":0.2681984734134516,"score_gpt":0.3486233364624546,"score_spread":0.08042486304900298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035943817","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38698348,0.013470579,0.27504772,0.014622377,0.005295185,0.05223579,0.01855295,0.0046384567,0.22915345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5274286,0.006901418,0.30406603,0.009760414,0.0015122722,0.028597305,0.014683839,0.0016133088,0.10543681],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9259209,0.022197982,0.007661328,0.0066098557,0.033643767,0.003966106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92582196,0.021931475,0.007145768,0.007980588,0.0358533,0.0012669065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.060323395,0.0015601008,0.0015048368,0.0043603093,0.0037001388,0.005463279,0.0042431,0.010280293,0.008075708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06341702,0.0016260674,0.0031514857,0.0019254284,0.003417586,0.003397904,0.0034252943,0.0050820475,0.0064706714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00574922,0.0019535914,0.030299557,0.009718312,0.00041725548,0.010045271,0.012917645,0.009506645,0.4624041,0.048836,0.10589967,0.3022527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041306138,0.0045597954,0.03140154,0.0036028419,0.0005065516,0.003083444,0.0028444594,0.00570556,0.2897074,0.009580076,0.6479788,0.00061660405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067880927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008721656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060323395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043788846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0137214875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31902444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123256566","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6374","title":"Reasoned opinion on the toxicological properties and maximum residue levels for propoxur","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Agricultural safety and regulations","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Propoxur; Member states; European commission; Reference values; Risk assessment; European union; Environmental health; Toxicology; Business; Pesticide; Biology; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.11105889405071277,"score_gpt":0.24327690574981634,"score_spread":0.13221801169910358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123256566","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016730051,0.031619746,0.08148922,0.36365038,0.078557886,0.008262053,0.012794791,0.0025524371,0.40434334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07393203,0.015661221,0.10039965,0.37736914,0.01701001,0.005730467,0.0066919094,0.00084672467,0.4023589],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9412485,0.009514403,0.010569103,0.003932611,0.030205162,0.0045302166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9409874,0.019704612,0.0037891725,0.0033769,0.030434167,0.0017077527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04876724,0.0020722393,0.0027183173,0.0036479533,0.0054332213,0.009223421,0.00852506,0.07832631,0.012600738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052544482,0.0023386388,0.007768027,0.0018498298,0.004945779,0.004987977,0.0037276805,0.02397994,0.015708603],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005671772,0.00038229988,0.0010382795,0.0024565167,0.00018158714,0.005146532,0.0029795344,0.0025143132,0.040523205,0.11821455,0.7768591,0.049136966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010091855,0.00022170608,0.0011305284,0.0018173925,0.00016508292,0.00048327207,0.00046489984,0.000601733,0.0060137385,0.01271008,0.97608066,0.00021007872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018081637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014459923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07832631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0113242725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036547825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25790888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135265863","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6459","title":"Monitoring of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in mustelids","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Food Inspection Agency","keywords":"Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Virology; Biology; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Sars virus; Zoology; Medicine; Internal medicine; Outbreak","score_opus":0.07804751524370275,"score_gpt":0.40599228627084477,"score_spread":0.32794477102714203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135265863","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99805695,0.00022499645,0.0002881791,0.000029153476,0.0000072206512,0.000030123545,0.00033936015,0.000015876869,0.0010080766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966702,0.0002477315,0.001558137,0.000035393412,0.000010852392,0.000044679087,0.000868279,0.0000029962682,0.0005618226],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951017,0.00010522713,0.000037321755,0.00013626808,0.00012492266,0.00008611353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995635,0.000051094004,0.00017176571,0.000018884042,0.00009534517,0.000099383535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005271459,0.00030282297,0.00031927298,0.0011567887,0.00039435714,0.00037018768,0.00034783938,0.000347849,0.000436802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008106557,0.00012790314,0.00022189213,0.00045594634,0.00024864983,0.00034643887,0.00037585365,0.00017895373,0.00015881647],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022026445,0.000048400907,0.97846794,0.00006999145,0.000029189136,0.00041324642,0.00043076937,0.0002689795,0.01338801,0.000035127316,0.00022750924,0.0064006536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005221421,0.0002949034,0.99485934,0.000025383075,0.000029315575,0.000521768,0.00034815844,0.00069472066,0.0023730993,0.000029978108,0.0008117024,0.0000064647347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066581685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012109377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066581685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041610617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003655001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013238847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3142050569","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6553","title":"General scientific guidance for stakeholders on health claim applications (Revision 1)1","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling","field":"Medicine","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Novelis (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); European commission; Health claims on food labels; Commission; Medicine; Set (abstract data type); Public relations; Political science; Law; Business; Computer science; European union","score_opus":0.11511883937939169,"score_gpt":0.3739088036314186,"score_spread":0.25878996425202694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3142050569","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005187599,0.0075682662,0.061954107,0.22951637,0.018904153,0.050059542,0.030890359,0.0105776545,0.58534205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024769934,0.011946471,0.15073471,0.21066315,0.010073376,0.055407293,0.030189816,0.0039905976,0.5022246],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8569214,0.055569846,0.019114919,0.004999426,0.05593289,0.007461523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6758451,0.16033264,0.01762638,0.016359782,0.12498398,0.0048521054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11167363,0.0022889215,0.0022615853,0.008599715,0.006520358,0.015339635,0.009171923,0.045024242,0.0775695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27492738,0.0038166489,0.004071392,0.0061117816,0.005114261,0.007488625,0.0072708544,0.015380716,0.117095664],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009265949,0.00016865578,0.00030399844,0.00084444217,0.000010988836,0.00030018867,0.0010453407,0.00025665972,0.00090766785,0.011780405,0.9465805,0.037708525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000107990076,0.00015757258,0.0015799857,0.00241401,0.000021034917,0.0002839803,0.0006110929,0.00030923,0.00073901284,0.008397073,0.985283,0.000095975214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019304376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023883393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11167363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008701306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042692214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5905937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3142516488","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6543","title":"Guidance on the preparation and presentation of applications for exemption from mandatory labelling of food allergens and/or products thereof pursuant to Article 21 (2) of Regulation (EU) No 1169/20111","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Agricultural safety and regulations","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Novelis (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"European commission; European union; Presentation (obstetrics); Business; Labelling; Commission; Medicine; Risk analysis (engineering); Biotechnology; Marketing; Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Biology; Finance; Surgery; International trade","score_opus":0.03321743017273942,"score_gpt":0.2530053048028976,"score_spread":0.2197878746301582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3142516488","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006802867,0.012549721,0.09969556,0.11895204,0.040250834,0.07601219,0.039896425,0.011984975,0.59385544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023540203,0.016209416,0.15009774,0.10516068,0.008906124,0.0861995,0.034417056,0.0038833986,0.5715859],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.88884896,0.049897872,0.017610896,0.004655339,0.033548098,0.005438818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.790053,0.10806793,0.015951004,0.011427293,0.06869462,0.0058062417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.082486816,0.002144205,0.003168374,0.0064392737,0.0045377254,0.011182812,0.008625728,0.03089641,0.15219127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20032936,0.0040584644,0.00475107,0.004165275,0.004271835,0.00701709,0.004911834,0.011896432,0.18330514],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000253684,0.00024672953,0.00023653348,0.001961733,0.00002079081,0.00048679885,0.00090883527,0.00036248253,0.0025229515,0.008838371,0.9352304,0.048930578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025174682,0.0004018106,0.0021825698,0.0036527922,0.000038659826,0.00049501995,0.0005471351,0.00034497274,0.0011758836,0.00792112,0.98285747,0.00013072827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053553553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008480643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15219127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036474336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026491225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5091305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200221854","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2021.7022","title":"Pest categorisation of Xylotrechus chinensis","year":2021,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Research on scale insects","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alpha Technologies (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"PEST analysis; Frass; Longhorn beetle; Biology; Bark (sound); European union; Larva; Voltinism; Botany; Pheromone trap; Horticulture; Ecology","score_opus":0.03606308971072628,"score_gpt":0.27590715993892556,"score_spread":0.23984407022819929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200221854","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9895075,0.000737557,0.00033606932,0.00007556603,0.000018037219,0.00020112465,0.0021908942,0.000040497336,0.0068927426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99261886,0.00038837432,0.0007871113,0.00010576674,0.000012696579,0.00009853901,0.0036439765,0.000005355662,0.0023393643],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99976426,0.000022199727,0.000029317729,0.000045400695,0.00009242136,0.000046399353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997645,0.000022175187,0.000074001015,0.000013270473,0.00009184385,0.000034141885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003242256,0.00048280144,0.00021080788,0.001894401,0.0004090337,0.00030358727,0.00021538744,0.00027573117,0.0035962774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031723888,0.000059778202,0.00037774723,0.0006257837,0.0002208307,0.000253546,0.00047551922,0.0001702715,0.00056458754],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010128325,0.00021713701,0.8077563,0.0005273399,0.00012404383,0.0012128279,0.0014160367,0.0006145577,0.1149472,0.0004454194,0.0022184364,0.06950788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001059814,0.00040408448,0.99087524,0.00005155704,0.000047571277,0.00064431794,0.0005216112,0.00046918582,0.003541082,0.000110169436,0.0033079307,0.000016686447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014301462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023306487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014301462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004990242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038893108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028436422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200423674","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6970","title":"Scientific Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR Panel) on testing and interpretation of comparative in vitro metabolism studies","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Agricultural safety and regulations","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"In vivo; Metabolite; Animal testing; In vitro toxicology; In vitro; Pharmacology; Toxicity; Biochemical engineering; Toxicology; Biology; Biotechnology; Computational biology; Chemistry; Biochemistry; Ecology","score_opus":0.1458747886022418,"score_gpt":0.2681474338392868,"score_spread":0.12227264523704501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200423674","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040455568,0.028471611,0.007029243,0.74280083,0.15532422,0.0005842847,0.0024205714,0.00017853477,0.059145223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03049863,0.031529263,0.018268371,0.72284883,0.101997085,0.0011864743,0.002538701,0.00022891889,0.09090361],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98366773,0.00281686,0.002161711,0.0012603281,0.009023628,0.0010697491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9342107,0.015033388,0.0049185045,0.0023000236,0.039363,0.0041744276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027791424,0.0010505695,0.0019844284,0.0016870035,0.00262673,0.0046832915,0.0038781604,0.03672813,0.00642356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0410949,0.0006652986,0.0026412923,0.0018138662,0.0028195716,0.0023772551,0.0018445987,0.018214054,0.008077661],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003589583,0.00021152623,0.0011760981,0.0010647182,0.00012312802,0.00057504664,0.00028072344,0.00028673455,0.0073671094,0.005080962,0.9304764,0.052998528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006633755,0.00014851376,0.0023518356,0.001039802,0.00016212136,0.00038104388,0.00022382369,0.0003219817,0.003587101,0.0048816428,0.9867748,0.000061014136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051431353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052876053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03672813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002479164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011747894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14697689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205157324","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7067","title":"Assessment of the control measures for category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Contagious Bovine Pleuropneumonia","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Microbial infections and disease research","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alpha Technologies (Canada)","funders":"European Food Safety Authority","keywords":"Contagious bovine pleuropneumonia; Pleuropneumonia; Animal health; Veterinary medicine; Biology; Medicine; Virology","score_opus":0.018597572994391864,"score_gpt":0.3143355343454345,"score_spread":0.29573796135104263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205157324","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28065485,0.049243562,0.20792237,0.03033639,0.0032084666,0.017484583,0.008562814,0.0007118237,0.40187508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82501215,0.00960029,0.13280237,0.005951228,0.0005917752,0.004744075,0.0036767942,0.00006739064,0.01755391],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9127737,0.023320219,0.007105597,0.0038505893,0.04919054,0.0037593376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9175845,0.028914519,0.012064053,0.0022909045,0.037677363,0.0014686256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07071915,0.0014579354,0.00091802917,0.00596086,0.0011024178,0.005111064,0.0033777456,0.005130036,0.004479011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.076186255,0.00045895646,0.0017472475,0.0018126502,0.0018176144,0.0027176102,0.00248327,0.002222289,0.00075101753],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011224628,0.0020117674,0.0900659,0.015552288,0.0011629278,0.0014690709,0.005088667,0.03634297,0.04127754,0.13296959,0.054975428,0.61796135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048686584,0.014475531,0.3202051,0.02237817,0.0022022973,0.0015839529,0.008771225,0.054796387,0.07269992,0.040237945,0.46148604,0.000676577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011949219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010651832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07071915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063748416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013048979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3740031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205176351","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7070","title":"Assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Rift Valley Fever","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Viral Infections and Vectors","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alpha Technologies (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Rift Valley fever; Veterinary medicine; Medicine; Biology; Virology; Outbreak","score_opus":0.029138355824228104,"score_gpt":0.3193232072574142,"score_spread":0.2901848514331861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205176351","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30858225,0.033159945,0.16718587,0.046370905,0.0027328257,0.007275938,0.0066247447,0.0009193048,0.4271481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8879462,0.00618544,0.07368932,0.0069891503,0.000564419,0.0018043512,0.0022947674,0.00008977465,0.020436587],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9526635,0.012141749,0.003055932,0.0026378625,0.026787596,0.0027133364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94657177,0.013739831,0.007007988,0.0015686733,0.02995145,0.0011602399],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038524017,0.0008651022,0.00067016843,0.004012985,0.0009707975,0.0051270816,0.0025330454,0.0042229467,0.0031300755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046344202,0.00034569768,0.0010707169,0.0010910019,0.0017326823,0.0025129,0.0021417986,0.0020887651,0.00065773766],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006562012,0.0011109237,0.08779859,0.007929808,0.0006516245,0.0018157528,0.00586433,0.030404557,0.03905342,0.18118337,0.09187038,0.551661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002862678,0.005960996,0.3124502,0.011031831,0.0009253483,0.0014721701,0.0073284167,0.032874335,0.042000864,0.032498434,0.55264175,0.0005293758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01423676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010697497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038524017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053205513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013078809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2037369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205438236","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7069","title":"Assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Burkholderia mallei (Glanders)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Burkholderia infections and melioidosis","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alpha Technologies (Canada)","funders":"European Food Safety Authority","keywords":"Burkholderia; Biology; Environmental health; Law; Medicine; Political science; Genetics; Bacteria","score_opus":0.029894864314438892,"score_gpt":0.2995316749373904,"score_spread":0.26963681062295153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205438236","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32960376,0.061859243,0.042203676,0.088473015,0.0024980858,0.005496819,0.0028193973,0.0003652437,0.4666808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9106631,0.0119357165,0.034699928,0.016176809,0.0005072416,0.0007918593,0.0010309337,0.00002939929,0.024165073],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97440267,0.0088768015,0.0020042935,0.0015509315,0.01125863,0.0019067652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97433925,0.009003638,0.0047799633,0.0007602571,0.010154754,0.0009621555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03130925,0.0006170953,0.00040015724,0.0028876704,0.0010919081,0.0044710278,0.0013566744,0.0046184612,0.0031948448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031704094,0.00023940638,0.000501877,0.00075500406,0.0018470163,0.0023724493,0.0022252717,0.0015868844,0.0004706144],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007127667,0.0009398647,0.11102181,0.0074620172,0.00033424157,0.003057796,0.008458884,0.005788354,0.061698887,0.14466275,0.07682448,0.57903814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016458574,0.004398819,0.22592899,0.013179215,0.0005884129,0.0020417077,0.01057428,0.007857343,0.053760886,0.026727086,0.65442604,0.00035268784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013548549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013992872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03130925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036555994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008901959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1655811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205443971","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7024","title":"Pest categorisation of Maconellicoccus hirsutus","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Research on scale insects","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alpha Technologies (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; PEST analysis; Ornamental plant; Hibiscus; Quarantine; Phytosanitary certification; Subtropics; Horticulture; Botany; Ecology","score_opus":0.03569355742599646,"score_gpt":0.26604151121172404,"score_spread":0.2303479537857276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205443971","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97915477,0.003062204,0.0006180368,0.00020063184,0.000068392386,0.00025208347,0.0041814307,0.000068511465,0.01239391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987593,0.00084270845,0.0012250722,0.0002779481,0.00002945028,0.00009103304,0.005712613,0.0000061114215,0.0042220014],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997365,0.000034879966,0.00003273203,0.000049207967,0.00009476631,0.000051924133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994584,0.00005462735,0.00020133983,0.000024847703,0.00021015086,0.000050598126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005401851,0.00042737657,0.00016658432,0.0016150636,0.00028550322,0.00029083856,0.00019619199,0.00026472958,0.0028021073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005709806,0.000059624606,0.00029327552,0.00049106934,0.0001597082,0.00019352403,0.00030819612,0.00014256066,0.00058873894],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008654677,0.00019137941,0.85806763,0.00044944047,0.000090266236,0.0009015022,0.00088079576,0.0007032151,0.036795072,0.0002218939,0.00601076,0.09482264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000082352235,0.00040121004,0.9896271,0.00012346022,0.000031000018,0.00042161005,0.00037350552,0.00042536945,0.0014235597,0.000054859698,0.0071009644,0.00000906803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01563371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022316545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01563371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038688723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023138309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031085432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205771890","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7122","title":"Avian influenza overview May – September 2021","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Influenza Virus Research Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alpha Technologies (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Influenza A virus subtype H5N1; Overwintering; Highly pathogenic; Virus; Biology; Waterfowl; Influenza A virus; Reassortment; Poultry farming; Bird migration; Veterinary medicine; Virology; Geography; Zoology; Ecology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Medicine","score_opus":0.13722491809711007,"score_gpt":0.42738393829374616,"score_spread":0.2901590201966361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205771890","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04203596,0.115613006,0.0036715283,0.018002693,0.03603728,0.0012902289,0.089219466,0.0021443178,0.6919855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18907769,0.09524992,0.007904846,0.0149838105,0.01779634,0.0011009484,0.22745565,0.0004552811,0.44597563],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959975,0.000037473797,0.000045184916,0.000045822562,0.00017622749,0.000095510615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991055,0.000028564524,0.0001162609,0.00002009405,0.0004112823,0.0003182875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065495283,0.0007369895,0.00024944602,0.0018911491,0.0006092936,0.0011297216,0.000497565,0.0008790738,0.031580944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006596174,0.00018232227,0.00028353848,0.00088669657,0.00013137121,0.000711291,0.00082909013,0.0009465015,0.018884065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033892834,0.000095686504,0.024994334,0.0013850178,0.000030475374,0.0005609768,0.00016453101,0.00021963047,0.0025881731,0.0007356138,0.6489155,0.3199711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007824767,0.00007943524,0.062544845,0.0004464073,0.000009823091,0.00043903835,0.000102162354,0.000087995155,0.00017636994,0.00012261306,0.9359742,0.000009190841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014515437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023781804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031580944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008226454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011572979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.105648816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205995618","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2948","title":"Reasoned opinion on the setting of new MRLs for penthiopyrad in various crops","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Agricultural safety and regulations","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"European commission; Agricultural science; Sunflower; Biotechnology; Risk assessment; Business; Crop; Pesticide residue; European union; Toxicology; Pesticide; Biology; Agronomy; Computer science; International trade","score_opus":0.03675865429234651,"score_gpt":0.25299889241322615,"score_spread":0.21624023812087964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205995618","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017347068,0.04470721,0.052311175,0.6109235,0.070215,0.002417739,0.0047547785,0.0018865374,0.19543698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08545315,0.016017638,0.05352821,0.6321222,0.012623334,0.0026824276,0.0015614429,0.00047644033,0.1955351],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9603354,0.0066427635,0.0066674114,0.005026305,0.017570242,0.0037579052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97019625,0.01371036,0.0026897602,0.0018079907,0.010678606,0.00091710925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037015084,0.0022357416,0.002036901,0.0022516653,0.0042725853,0.0087882,0.009920726,0.08268561,0.0046061864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032432172,0.0020744423,0.006655759,0.0015422109,0.007804415,0.0049239593,0.0034015682,0.03634721,0.0059135607],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055031915,0.00033487732,0.0015694883,0.0019648827,0.00018359898,0.003836165,0.003926858,0.0029998836,0.029380552,0.2799455,0.63497704,0.040330887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013231282,0.00029670022,0.0022769351,0.002083576,0.00024361922,0.0006591104,0.0009051315,0.0009454787,0.009335443,0.031558126,0.9512178,0.00034571427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018844565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015044975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08268561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010496939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021646252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1957568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206027540","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7092","title":"Pest categorisation of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense Tropical Race 4","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Banana Cultivation and Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alpha Technologies (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. cubense; Biology; Fusarium oxysporum; Quarantine; Fusarium wilt; Pathogen; Host (biology); PEST analysis; Fungus; Veterinary medicine; Botany; Ecology; Microbiology","score_opus":0.027164482323745295,"score_gpt":0.245306916138784,"score_spread":0.2181424338150387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206027540","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9834484,0.0005575068,0.0014950878,0.00012579825,0.000029738078,0.0005155702,0.005359321,0.000082219325,0.0083863465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9746266,0.00048312865,0.0073625445,0.00020875277,0.000019911437,0.00027753907,0.012471632,0.000022242279,0.0045277225],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993344,0.00011096276,0.00007866442,0.00012561481,0.00019462727,0.00015569631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987601,0.00015938266,0.00041544493,0.00008371774,0.00045718148,0.00012425454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011705128,0.00053692237,0.00030662143,0.0019301157,0.00038523512,0.00041905843,0.00032535114,0.000436802,0.0038301086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010246729,0.000101042795,0.00050837983,0.00070148415,0.00020806355,0.00031743737,0.00063809496,0.00030794676,0.0007764705],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017390833,0.00031511186,0.71638685,0.0005014369,0.00012768342,0.0013528948,0.0014021711,0.00058115827,0.19796196,0.00035322507,0.0039404314,0.07533794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023498593,0.0013100359,0.9702861,0.000093340495,0.000080213846,0.001179305,0.0007517675,0.0006389228,0.013602376,0.0001044242,0.01190609,0.000024081002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008020875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01057681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008020875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060279114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048003974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015948355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206283985","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7014","title":"Commodity risk assessment of specified species of Lonicera potted plants from Turkey","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Research on scale insects","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alpha Technologies (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"PEST analysis; Quarantine; Risk assessment; European commission; Expert opinion; Business; European union; Biology; Toxicology; Ecology; Horticulture; Computer science; International trade; Medicine","score_opus":0.05231838608251389,"score_gpt":0.2835627248815849,"score_spread":0.23124433879907103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206283985","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9861314,0.0011409747,0.0038477338,0.0000912084,0.000017730103,0.00011604781,0.0008460681,0.000030418156,0.0077783014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99352163,0.00084739266,0.0031649761,0.000026967578,0.0000043501846,0.00002375812,0.0013365793,0.0000076266315,0.0010668092],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993286,0.00012232905,0.000052539108,0.00012227306,0.00031233556,0.000061937615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891424,0.000348502,0.0002521192,0.00005627622,0.00038061207,0.00004836757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014778185,0.0006111565,0.00038329288,0.001442699,0.00032963254,0.0010489363,0.00052158086,0.0006360418,0.0012289843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001207789,0.00012954323,0.00070982595,0.0007144337,0.00024283082,0.0006094778,0.00059660536,0.00032077162,0.00016703665],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0035242718,0.0007903421,0.27382532,0.005272376,0.0006085726,0.013112484,0.0049787085,0.18129604,0.28698963,0.004952339,0.0046607316,0.21998926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007577093,0.0068048057,0.6991166,0.0011269004,0.0010997346,0.005765069,0.0109835835,0.11014129,0.120576434,0.004401991,0.039626084,0.00028177243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006575472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008968558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006575472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013851052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005336519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013074398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206799551","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2022.6930","title":"Pest categorisation of Apium virus Y","year":2022,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Plant Virus Research Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alpha Technologies (Canada)","funders":"Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche; European Food Safety Authority","keywords":"Phytosanitary certification; Biology; European union; Quarantine; Weed; Myzus persicae; PEST analysis; Potyvirus; Plant virus; Horticulture; Aphid; Botany; Virus; Virology; Ecology","score_opus":0.042373561422333374,"score_gpt":0.2775157785353034,"score_spread":0.23514221711297004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206799551","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5093332,0.01725716,0.024592657,0.002873772,0.0014776654,0.016883388,0.1887661,0.0017951905,0.2370208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71731037,0.0072650462,0.042529635,0.0029406028,0.00030869362,0.0067296885,0.18226416,0.00026277947,0.04038905],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977379,0.00044425993,0.00036485217,0.00025368438,0.00076219824,0.0004371436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996858,0.00039924006,0.0009981863,0.00022966079,0.0012835497,0.00023136097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028571493,0.00070655777,0.000495501,0.004867376,0.0005855182,0.0008930434,0.00068442343,0.0006763142,0.012101309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024204336,0.00013065152,0.0009211435,0.0023164107,0.00039534993,0.00077983004,0.0013516621,0.00064139895,0.0030387293],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0041014096,0.0007129805,0.3676198,0.008196287,0.00032723809,0.0025566428,0.005475617,0.0018091452,0.11031102,0.013402323,0.13067883,0.35480866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084011575,0.0015926572,0.57625735,0.0014285421,0.00012063656,0.0013086984,0.0024939557,0.0012592763,0.0056800097,0.0015681911,0.40811646,0.00009021623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0106402105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006779955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012101309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011375996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013233426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04048294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210306525","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7091","title":"Pest categorisation of Bagrada hilaris","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Hemiptera Insect Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alpha Technologies (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"PEST analysis; Pentatomidae; Biology; Mediterranean climate; Hemiptera; Geography; Agroforestry; Ecology; Botany","score_opus":0.023686557772456613,"score_gpt":0.22321039368687787,"score_spread":0.19952383591442124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210306525","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89644384,0.012040866,0.0019258551,0.0007043447,0.00022830073,0.00087757834,0.019578516,0.0004081982,0.067792594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9658626,0.0037835205,0.0031812452,0.0006571895,0.000052630796,0.00015957853,0.0146479,0.00002886863,0.011626467],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999566,0.00005634646,0.0000675582,0.00008616878,0.00013626933,0.000087573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992261,0.00007052041,0.00032286707,0.00004837132,0.0002468393,0.000085265274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072956696,0.00048039478,0.0002875726,0.0030438835,0.00048647166,0.0006697084,0.0003452884,0.00032973467,0.004095218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004995696,0.00009799226,0.0004917277,0.0012852461,0.0002880094,0.00034386176,0.0005779064,0.00025862313,0.0012467459],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011636814,0.00037968234,0.7758177,0.0013828987,0.00026036892,0.0015193913,0.002043929,0.0010022763,0.031191647,0.00092423306,0.013491315,0.1708229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009445939,0.00028908555,0.9716912,0.00022369181,0.000079373836,0.0008682983,0.00087959104,0.0003016945,0.0015632776,0.00009479307,0.023982814,0.000016598357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025304263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0401451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025304263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008542248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040992352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05031395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210354774","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7076","title":"Assessment of animal diseases caused by bacteria resistant to antimicrobials: kept fish species","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Aquaculture disease management and microbiota","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alpha Technologies (Canada)","funders":"European Food Safety Authority","keywords":"Antimicrobial; Biology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Bacteria; Microbiology; Food science; Fishery","score_opus":0.010919579231134478,"score_gpt":0.25197058493503033,"score_spread":0.24105100570389584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210354774","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49907896,0.43652973,0.010947846,0.004968409,0.000517671,0.001006019,0.006199435,0.00006292699,0.040688973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74339026,0.22619441,0.02065732,0.0019811187,0.0002863661,0.00040647318,0.0023789743,0.000020791102,0.004684355],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99680257,0.00086147664,0.0007205926,0.0003011257,0.0011930157,0.00012125156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943083,0.0019058773,0.0018642256,0.00010677771,0.0017068847,0.00010792134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049020806,0.00039685957,0.0007098223,0.005714113,0.00033484408,0.0014042096,0.0004195057,0.0007593474,0.002084343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050364435,0.0001300358,0.0007954009,0.0023121664,0.0005530566,0.0008459573,0.0008064236,0.00026409078,0.0002359965],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007108334,0.00016201305,0.1674288,0.105914295,0.0012783133,0.003721708,0.006760263,0.000940447,0.058220655,0.0025505533,0.0037679672,0.64854413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039937964,0.0037964303,0.5873537,0.053983994,0.005080805,0.008579778,0.02808652,0.00075805525,0.030037044,0.0030379568,0.27903026,0.00021548852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026188241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0091411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005714113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067104376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020314471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02592498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210390556","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7025","title":"Proposal of a ranking methodology for plant threats in the EU","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Insect-Plant Interactions and Control","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alpha Technologies (Canada)","funders":"Directorate-General for Health and Consumers; Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l’Alimentation, de l’Environnement et du Travail; European Food Safety Authority","keywords":"European commission; Ranking (information retrieval); Risk assessment; Risk analysis (engineering); Biotechnology; Agricultural science; Business; Computer science; European union; Environmental science; Biology; Information retrieval; Computer security","score_opus":0.07784762654065172,"score_gpt":0.29520995826258406,"score_spread":0.21736233172193234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210390556","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020251548,0.0003869525,0.9630055,0.0006524356,0.00013389194,0.0017581639,0.0012106084,0.0013957797,0.011205141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06355418,0.00012162392,0.93303996,0.00007273794,0.000038975388,0.0007199992,0.0010190023,0.00007877112,0.001354781],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9817058,0.009456078,0.0028080842,0.0017197581,0.0035237393,0.0007866219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98264796,0.00719404,0.0015020409,0.001367777,0.006825645,0.00046248798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021116216,0.0014705979,0.001700686,0.014520791,0.0012107159,0.0072590513,0.0020954192,0.0012830762,0.006605182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035189793,0.00058355153,0.0024806373,0.007434827,0.001015332,0.003157878,0.0033124997,0.0012708331,0.0023425997],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002565802,0.00041372236,0.011074841,0.0010508769,0.0003862724,0.000426675,0.0015692747,0.029606046,0.0053602615,0.12187445,0.01034153,0.81763947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044533995,0.0026788395,0.044252314,0.001281725,0.0005700859,0.0020612825,0.007119286,0.47909853,0.01782471,0.30911836,0.13496876,0.00058083166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040364037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031826196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021116216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022466828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005231094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11167455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210658958","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7104","title":"SCAN‐Clim: a tool to support pest climate suitability analysis based on climate classification","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Insect-Plant Interactions and Control","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alpha Technologies (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"PEST analysis; Risk assessment; Climate change; Climate change scenario; Documentation; Integrated pest management; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Business; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.02141783956809984,"score_gpt":0.25236565430233254,"score_spread":0.2309478147342327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210658958","genre_codex":"software","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016805312,0.0006833117,0.24544613,0.00053342734,0.0002971324,0.00054628664,0.19916172,0.51421696,0.022309724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15069619,0.001080885,0.45596933,0.0005960172,0.00019172295,0.002468301,0.27779895,0.09461968,0.016578937],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991254,0.00019977425,0.000101946,0.00024279565,0.00025743645,0.00007269775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964167,0.0018013131,0.00031599108,0.00046538844,0.0007822428,0.00021839584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017851347,0.0020844887,0.0012723427,0.003717648,0.0004924674,0.002198939,0.0019728034,0.0009842189,0.057831768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077044163,0.0010663733,0.0023101915,0.002870667,0.0003377607,0.0025251156,0.0025964256,0.001260083,0.027736707],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010198699,0.00025157133,0.022113372,0.00475621,0.00097561395,0.0009712869,0.0021658125,0.024554614,0.008933513,0.00614438,0.6487631,0.27935076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063945213,0.000303444,0.047669314,0.0010997972,0.00046515412,0.0013874784,0.0010740515,0.21018882,0.016199093,0.026196256,0.6940517,0.00072543736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006475897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009005569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057831768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049687043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010524623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19346654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210873018","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7080","title":"Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial‐resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius in dogs and cats","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alpha Technologies (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Staphylococcus pseudintermedius; Listing (finance); Antimicrobial; Animal health; CATS; Veterinary medicine; Companion animal; Biology; Law; Medicine; Staphylococcus; Staphylococcus aureus; Political science; Microbiology; Business; Internal medicine; Genetics; Bacteria","score_opus":0.01015252511914387,"score_gpt":0.2847626231539151,"score_spread":0.2746100980347712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210873018","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8584482,0.003197972,0.033731632,0.009416966,0.0004146904,0.0034218617,0.009581115,0.00016536181,0.08162216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96694106,0.0006587173,0.021776747,0.0010018256,0.0001419615,0.0013095824,0.005328844,0.000021475147,0.002819804],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9163447,0.0310077,0.012857898,0.0038617924,0.032513253,0.003414575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85747504,0.069650955,0.024907509,0.0046382803,0.040957615,0.0023706378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08701819,0.0005472732,0.00080869056,0.008861169,0.0010202125,0.0050294874,0.0019587034,0.0029651104,0.0029415342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1267312,0.0003353022,0.001989384,0.004317342,0.0020454924,0.0031039256,0.0048494902,0.0014764364,0.00061500305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013783716,0.0006897779,0.74594563,0.0047529223,0.00091711886,0.0013595668,0.024653334,0.011220604,0.004505806,0.048259914,0.01762763,0.13868925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012996676,0.0022427768,0.8639246,0.005226586,0.0008788039,0.00085172773,0.023788491,0.018105388,0.006493448,0.016606394,0.061483935,0.000267803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009018651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00815491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08701819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044072145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007953522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46020168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212828918","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7127","title":"Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial‐resistant Enterococcus faecalis in poultry","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alpha Technologies (Canada)","funders":"European Food Safety Authority","keywords":"Enterococcus faecalis; Antimicrobial; Animal health; Listing (finance); Enterococcus; Veterinary medicine; Biology; Biotechnology; Law; Microbiology; Business; Medicine; Political science; Staphylococcus aureus; Antibiotics; Bacteria","score_opus":0.01719697571989672,"score_gpt":0.2699640033741282,"score_spread":0.2527670276542315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212828918","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7664499,0.003446463,0.065302484,0.010741757,0.00056565116,0.0047603524,0.010328853,0.0002332893,0.1381712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95096064,0.00070203835,0.03634211,0.001122394,0.00016038929,0.0016896406,0.0049447217,0.000027158385,0.0040508853],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.89632165,0.03747293,0.012899954,0.0045849467,0.044417642,0.0043028602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8541586,0.0717885,0.023751114,0.0058362368,0.042107694,0.0023578482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.093003206,0.0007963944,0.0009575585,0.008135306,0.0011898114,0.0059461067,0.0023438826,0.0037086143,0.0034933465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13512461,0.00035900722,0.0022466423,0.0041580363,0.0027333354,0.0039451183,0.0057588103,0.001951838,0.0007879448],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001998531,0.0013459852,0.58017236,0.0063060643,0.0014637888,0.0018918643,0.027908342,0.022438547,0.007865475,0.1106414,0.02473561,0.213232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021907987,0.005283799,0.76603,0.00705928,0.0012122041,0.0011075562,0.02985188,0.0319733,0.012727891,0.051411904,0.092635036,0.00048792252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008076808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072905994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.093003206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005362174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0092105055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49185383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214725805","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7126","title":"Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial‐resistant Enterococcus cecorum in poultry","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alpha Technologies (Canada)","funders":"Veterinärmedizinische Universität Wien; European Food Safety Authority","keywords":"Listing (finance); European union; Health claims on food labels; Enterococcus; Antimicrobial; Control (management); Animal health; Medicine; Veterinary medicine; Biology; Business; Computer science; Bacteria; Food science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.015943649609412042,"score_gpt":0.2654760739896415,"score_spread":0.24953242438022946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214725805","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7834814,0.0036066787,0.06370753,0.010495302,0.0005600487,0.004712201,0.009731,0.00021848777,0.123487376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9506641,0.00070058834,0.03700165,0.0011865678,0.00015996674,0.0016746229,0.004863096,0.00002558965,0.0037237362],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.895496,0.03814409,0.013279707,0.004690115,0.043960202,0.004429852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85413975,0.072167985,0.024190146,0.0054015755,0.041730847,0.0023696842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09611377,0.00078998227,0.00096432754,0.008283807,0.0012096207,0.00587522,0.0024264893,0.0037330678,0.0031107692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13508698,0.00036865345,0.0021869005,0.00409713,0.002686931,0.003958046,0.0058098705,0.0019244179,0.00072367693],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019583476,0.0012780593,0.6063804,0.0058759646,0.0013653417,0.001952303,0.027057353,0.022114925,0.008294669,0.10022818,0.023553539,0.1999409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021795928,0.005226914,0.7796611,0.006702427,0.0011633921,0.0011512082,0.029216379,0.03180886,0.013050459,0.04621456,0.08509955,0.00048709972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008341863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007821823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09611377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053489255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00942685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50830424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220919902","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7124","title":"Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial‐resistant Brachyspira hyodysenteriae in swine","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Veterinary medicine and infectious diseases","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alpha Technologies (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Listing (finance); Antimicrobial; Animal health; Health claims on food labels; Biology; Law; Political science; Medicine; Microbiology; Business; Veterinary medicine; Food science","score_opus":0.028406866955440632,"score_gpt":0.3307881633132168,"score_spread":0.30238129635777616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220919902","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8291688,0.0030445822,0.041282125,0.008647242,0.00044788473,0.0032891433,0.0074972613,0.0001705356,0.10645236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96024215,0.0006936362,0.027743563,0.0013219096,0.00014807699,0.0012266856,0.0045502116,0.000022723898,0.0040510814],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9188483,0.027248701,0.010945614,0.004074301,0.034712438,0.004170538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87878,0.058905363,0.020602083,0.004242078,0.035412148,0.0020583572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07900555,0.0006503242,0.00082130684,0.008099341,0.0011429753,0.0053175115,0.0022325155,0.003951898,0.0025584043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10522212,0.00037442314,0.0021140138,0.0036539081,0.0022645118,0.003185415,0.004817565,0.0016924646,0.00062921055],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017085816,0.0009831978,0.6841501,0.0044021825,0.0010398513,0.0019597088,0.02506134,0.019143833,0.011688102,0.06983431,0.021895953,0.15813282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001388938,0.0037425547,0.8213036,0.005089241,0.0009798493,0.0009687449,0.025937071,0.024228014,0.011929866,0.02648484,0.07881925,0.00037797907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009173799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00856679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07900555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041961344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072304737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41782624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221134748","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7144","title":"Pest categorisation of Zaprionus indianus","year":2022,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Insect behavior and control techniques","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alpha Technologies (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"PEST analysis; Phytosanitary certification; European union; Quarantine; Drosophila suzukii; Biology; European commission; Horticulture; Drosophilidae; Toxicology; Botany; Ecology; International trade; Drosophila melanogaster","score_opus":0.015965192292148794,"score_gpt":0.22273427299203,"score_spread":0.2067690806998812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221134748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90925694,0.00850795,0.0019129585,0.00041230014,0.00020634923,0.0011218461,0.016995417,0.00022295145,0.06136328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97481173,0.0028024563,0.004008893,0.0003404124,0.000045822806,0.0002535408,0.012160169,0.000021821834,0.0055551645],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952805,0.00005793381,0.00006646909,0.000073349336,0.00017675124,0.000097491946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993148,0.000049769293,0.0002889545,0.000035908244,0.00023654824,0.000073916395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056123047,0.00048605984,0.00027830308,0.0029392052,0.00046029274,0.0004587806,0.00045276532,0.00026776094,0.0032733264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061389536,0.00010609995,0.00063563243,0.0008728648,0.0002911196,0.0003008414,0.00071677996,0.0002951428,0.0009681263],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015133768,0.00026720625,0.7667053,0.00258158,0.00026404724,0.0011057233,0.0025752813,0.00124888,0.044194944,0.0010776764,0.011502091,0.16696395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012216868,0.0004051652,0.96958804,0.00044317366,0.00012021632,0.0010882444,0.0012308883,0.00046867004,0.0017169858,0.00014689106,0.024751348,0.000028120845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01500712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01500712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048800223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004364251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029839516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225472163","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7207","title":"Pest categorisation of Sirex nitobei","year":2022,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Forest Insect Ecology and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alpha Technologies (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"PEST analysis; Phytosanitary certification; Biology; Host (biology); Fungus; Pinus thunbergii; Botany; Ecology; Horticulture","score_opus":0.008417818455446261,"score_gpt":0.20979754796888406,"score_spread":0.2013797295134378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225472163","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9672209,0.0022096313,0.0016745284,0.0001455618,0.00006453373,0.0004895448,0.0042948006,0.000060696606,0.023839764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9786791,0.0013546473,0.004360716,0.00027820075,0.000025098623,0.00015940524,0.0082894685,0.000010783136,0.0068426873],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997328,0.000027860127,0.000029768711,0.000052618787,0.00010393859,0.00005294436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968076,0.00003191495,0.00011458684,0.000016136504,0.00011903379,0.00003753081],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004234988,0.0004225379,0.00019691316,0.0013745793,0.00033661377,0.00031716208,0.00023499574,0.00025732274,0.0022801722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035987076,0.00006645409,0.0003034284,0.00042876948,0.00017648058,0.00022907121,0.00044074468,0.00021142222,0.0005048677],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012350369,0.00027339344,0.763117,0.00089129974,0.00012214732,0.001344048,0.0018925198,0.0007656373,0.10666815,0.0009724944,0.0047588605,0.117959306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011408907,0.00066005264,0.97043824,0.00019872522,0.00005465668,0.0010241432,0.00076860416,0.0005587077,0.005624553,0.0001401162,0.02050222,0.000018468643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007739254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012939893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007739254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004162617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027937602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01538837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242287536","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3456","title":"Reasoned opinion on the import tolerance for glyphosate in genetically modified oilseed rape","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Glyphosate; Genetically modified organism; Residue (chemistry); Biotechnology; Herbicide resistance; Enforcement; Risk assessment; Pesticide residue; Biology; Pesticide; Toxicology; Agronomy; Gene; Weed control; Genetics; Biochemistry; Economics","score_opus":0.039443722324793734,"score_gpt":0.25300548249612204,"score_spread":0.2135617601713283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242287536","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051304314,0.032458093,0.049491182,0.63174725,0.05140064,0.0010901458,0.0036767763,0.001268067,0.1775635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28057614,0.0112828715,0.041162338,0.44479373,0.013303068,0.00091318187,0.0013886394,0.00038883396,0.20619123],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9836669,0.0024618064,0.0023650774,0.0022218523,0.007759864,0.00152458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856104,0.005654766,0.0011200068,0.0008782446,0.006325185,0.00041141963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018940905,0.0011061492,0.0009501431,0.0012393219,0.0026815927,0.0045335335,0.005047365,0.04263378,0.002778275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01924376,0.00063498784,0.0031593917,0.0007553548,0.0043670796,0.002271948,0.0015781583,0.014334409,0.0021911978],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00076713134,0.00027127008,0.004836228,0.0012133517,0.0002374686,0.0055626384,0.0052648424,0.0040907487,0.0676491,0.34926182,0.48858878,0.072256766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007869325,0.0002932801,0.004721719,0.0012795744,0.00030494705,0.0007149679,0.0010896726,0.0012746142,0.016114907,0.03158444,0.94229597,0.00024720153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024110606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016002852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04263378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074590333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013738256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.100170314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246420238","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3743","title":"Reasoned opinion on the setting of MRLs for imazapyr in genetically modified soya bean and other oilseeds and in lentils","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Agricultural safety and regulations","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sunflower; Imazapyr; Soya bean; Toxicology; Biotechnology; Biology; Agronomy; Food science; Glyphosate","score_opus":0.02089633924631883,"score_gpt":0.22974001857524945,"score_spread":0.2088436793289306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246420238","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01766832,0.03468446,0.03566743,0.7098861,0.06693138,0.001630262,0.0040693963,0.0012558608,0.12820685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09208743,0.0127681,0.04398279,0.6754796,0.0127895735,0.0019845779,0.0013604976,0.0004119638,0.15913545],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96351826,0.006245414,0.0059861415,0.004245049,0.016734488,0.0032706033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96733487,0.013736678,0.0030751787,0.0016496484,0.013182289,0.0010213028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033417445,0.0018630621,0.0017618269,0.0019729976,0.0039280816,0.0070737153,0.0076561957,0.07783723,0.004252731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033434816,0.0016368998,0.0058483994,0.0013827216,0.0076521314,0.0035156738,0.0025907021,0.029238418,0.0048505054],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00081932236,0.00035017997,0.0025182823,0.0024116582,0.00025818805,0.004328996,0.0051770257,0.0027650471,0.04834797,0.23918584,0.6449509,0.04888662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016667649,0.00033039734,0.0030566843,0.0021903748,0.000344818,0.000629964,0.0010683518,0.0008187737,0.011818519,0.022516482,0.95671195,0.00034695189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021888468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018756608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07783723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010177715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022221724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17673045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250759543","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4451","title":"Modification of the existing maximum residue levels for metconazole in various crops","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Agricultural safety and regulations","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sunflower; European commission; Agricultural science; Crop; Toxicology; European union; Business; Biotechnology; Environmental science; Horticulture; Biology; Agronomy","score_opus":0.06959117041255816,"score_gpt":0.2652473499606553,"score_spread":0.19565617954809714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250759543","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90978444,0.0020907028,0.037772194,0.0007113284,0.00018154942,0.0012167097,0.0042107636,0.000884011,0.04314845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9624728,0.0005796459,0.025290564,0.00046680935,0.000019424511,0.0006829276,0.0021060158,0.00010224579,0.008279565],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963444,0.0008437018,0.00025512712,0.0006260768,0.0016104382,0.00032029845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984127,0.00025532095,0.00028899914,0.00021366705,0.00077156606,0.00005762063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024136088,0.0005001506,0.00034665837,0.00083044305,0.0007888696,0.0011584167,0.0014858496,0.0015221128,0.0022809706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026387726,0.00028642203,0.00068638864,0.00052478863,0.000653109,0.00050787686,0.0005733357,0.0008086517,0.0007321049],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014031157,0.00039268855,0.008213826,0.0005245703,0.0000608637,0.00034302488,0.00032989812,0.0044762525,0.9392584,0.002478741,0.002829707,0.039688934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014986731,0.0040779402,0.04953511,0.00034393024,0.0002183374,0.00050904107,0.00035402636,0.007544539,0.87792474,0.0011798196,0.05806865,0.00009403067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010732813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016813489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010732813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016448402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001939483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021340668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250867632","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6799","title":"Commodity risk assessment of Citrus L. fruits from South Africa for Thaumatotibia leucotreta under a systems approach","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Insect behavior and control techniques","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alpha Technologies (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Tortricidae; European union; Business; Agricultural science; PEST analysis; Biology; Marketing; International trade","score_opus":0.05242342987386776,"score_gpt":0.26300435444543624,"score_spread":0.21058092457156846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250867632","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9791212,0.00066226104,0.009415244,0.00047198805,0.000009206217,0.00041270957,0.0003691698,0.000019121351,0.009519077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99340534,0.0004620862,0.0047326814,0.000043400396,0.0000035450369,0.00009550723,0.00017526057,0.0000026687344,0.0010793832],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987282,0.0006015185,0.000061008996,0.00013438611,0.00036140706,0.000113427435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967908,0.0021963448,0.00046722402,0.00009536911,0.0003794576,0.00007080043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027219497,0.00060533994,0.00027798777,0.0008599505,0.0004046506,0.0014785744,0.0004325527,0.00074438815,0.0023880918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034961195,0.00022252348,0.00076435314,0.00048446958,0.00042803827,0.0007525636,0.0010739256,0.00043081964,0.00015889388],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0040359916,0.00083451066,0.18054613,0.005279073,0.0008775552,0.007275567,0.008852494,0.46096393,0.16396162,0.013090087,0.0020456053,0.15223743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037717164,0.01590339,0.42460862,0.0022414254,0.0015812897,0.0031107138,0.01983078,0.3690977,0.10713988,0.022011131,0.03367422,0.0004236271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047501815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006543619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047501815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020556864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095241086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014915168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252524490","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1959","title":"Setting of an MRL for ethametsulfuron‐methyl in rape seed","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Agricultural safety and regulations","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Food Safety Authority","keywords":"European commission; Food safety; Directive; Commission; Political science; European union; Library science; Business; Agricultural science; Law; Computer science; Biology; Food science; International trade","score_opus":0.009396530571223556,"score_gpt":0.2332911280765948,"score_spread":0.22389459750537125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252524490","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7546972,0.006015834,0.100573555,0.006297659,0.0011803444,0.0036707167,0.004504609,0.0024536736,0.12060641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89169884,0.0013539066,0.068768986,0.003312448,0.00012041519,0.0016437011,0.0017999767,0.00033139726,0.030970251],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9850386,0.004757442,0.0012142443,0.0018543844,0.0061788303,0.0009565077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909949,0.0018347956,0.0012170051,0.00069968344,0.005020697,0.00023301096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008818529,0.0007626478,0.0007482701,0.0012224999,0.0015395104,0.0020477567,0.0021427087,0.003910856,0.0029332777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01053932,0.0006375494,0.0015583868,0.00056833803,0.0014051843,0.0008626415,0.0012447597,0.0017866334,0.0019066001],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00379597,0.00070960517,0.024892066,0.0014708823,0.00019665074,0.0019198499,0.002226445,0.007834474,0.8360153,0.01163141,0.017251853,0.09205556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036293195,0.008368024,0.040105756,0.00074792927,0.00052681245,0.0014301433,0.0011310187,0.007275487,0.8051158,0.0018204995,0.13282908,0.0002865642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017553143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025545128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017553143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004958317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046637356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254263884","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2771","title":"Reasoned opinion on the modification of the existing MRLs for ametoctradin in various commodities","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Agricultural safety and regulations","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"European commission; Agricultural science; Toxicology; Horticulture; Business; European union; Biology","score_opus":0.11001844390085566,"score_gpt":0.27651803909204,"score_spread":0.16649959519118432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254263884","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05652531,0.022205243,0.06402069,0.23683658,0.044345513,0.009412124,0.011046677,0.0026648934,0.55294293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15018825,0.0085817035,0.05920889,0.26853234,0.0071575884,0.005156669,0.003505864,0.00074250397,0.49692613],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96614975,0.005619545,0.005237198,0.003918838,0.015626807,0.0034478805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9811344,0.006469295,0.0016329625,0.0013069344,0.008864951,0.0005914032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030736927,0.001803332,0.0014482863,0.0021457348,0.0035080647,0.0071775652,0.0070927376,0.0586031,0.007326991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027087092,0.0017179651,0.0052994336,0.0013804047,0.004001608,0.003445205,0.002406944,0.01879029,0.006606421],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010383371,0.0007147111,0.0038350704,0.0021022179,0.00027142809,0.006769337,0.0038743217,0.004611167,0.07288901,0.24922909,0.60451657,0.050148714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021940503,0.0005329633,0.0042490615,0.001628768,0.00035927576,0.0005914074,0.00077794783,0.0014448246,0.017249102,0.014138989,0.9584897,0.0003185497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03009443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025120405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0586031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009047232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025966125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16255432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W428419734","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3771","title":"Scientific Opinion on the pest categorisation of Strawberry latent C virus","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Phytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"PEST analysis; Biology; Botany","score_opus":0.03283801700296585,"score_gpt":0.221279318999611,"score_spread":0.18844130199664516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W428419734","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009956771,0.35850284,0.009701048,0.4334261,0.12545212,0.0003155147,0.0031825176,0.0002795892,0.059183475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14226866,0.36973792,0.018184537,0.32730862,0.08269957,0.0009975414,0.008557952,0.0002914862,0.04995374],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930982,0.0014199591,0.0011515205,0.0010322022,0.0026624387,0.0006357315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9658138,0.007317527,0.0030688886,0.00094589783,0.020882955,0.0019708208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015216957,0.0009652614,0.0011741354,0.003109629,0.0014206194,0.0033566472,0.0027230189,0.008249012,0.004679963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014572667,0.00039455513,0.0015373204,0.00231314,0.0027983575,0.0025121516,0.0018509675,0.007013891,0.0033975278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047142725,0.00014967412,0.0067514414,0.006530875,0.00015626852,0.00040967745,0.0010230953,0.00046161382,0.011179656,0.016586496,0.4895395,0.4667403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030970416,0.00015909801,0.008470674,0.0039947717,0.00012215441,0.0003211521,0.0006177648,0.00019448104,0.0014461778,0.0041065626,0.98048407,0.00005205235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007820971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004277254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015216957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003028664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005774878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08047593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4290973805","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7415","title":"Avian influenza overview March – June 2022","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Influenza Virus Research Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Influenza A virus subtype H5N1; Biology; Virology; Virus","score_opus":0.1295490434283183,"score_gpt":0.4210819598575898,"score_spread":0.2915329164292715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4290973805","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009288825,0.10386568,0.002678701,0.01864231,0.069392934,0.0010094211,0.050564237,0.0014726035,0.7430852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0586361,0.118907265,0.0050993757,0.012410217,0.03370983,0.0011720457,0.13955629,0.0006824204,0.6298265],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999453,0.000060647744,0.00006383383,0.000061051,0.00026242176,0.0000989706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988834,0.000032183438,0.00011028911,0.000029153945,0.0005990717,0.0003459445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082679087,0.0009460372,0.0003428684,0.0015238575,0.0006335114,0.0018903059,0.0006174145,0.0010435083,0.06539855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009433837,0.00021543508,0.00033725024,0.0009633688,0.00015541879,0.0007634811,0.00093498884,0.0011871804,0.044794224],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020373058,0.000049206792,0.003064025,0.00082650245,0.000015422871,0.00025249427,0.000052286625,0.00014379309,0.00160278,0.0006496464,0.80824494,0.18489514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005147937,0.00002785091,0.0069579957,0.00023915328,0.0000037828845,0.00013789456,0.000024540961,0.00003744745,0.000088191606,0.00008312962,0.99239,0.0000049392625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010193272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016564926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06539855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007737944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001651416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21877992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297896152","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2022.e200923","title":"Editorial: Relevance of dog studies for the derivation of health‐based guidance values for plant protection products approval","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"European union; Hazard; Risk assessment; Hazard analysis; Risk analysis (engineering); Business; Population; Relevance (law); Observational study; Food safety; Animal testing; Biotechnology; Toxicology; Environmental health; Biology; Medicine; Computer science; Engineering; Ecology; Computer security; Pathology","score_opus":0.20999031437831675,"score_gpt":0.4354132215072312,"score_spread":0.22542290712891447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297896152","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000843409,0.0028637156,0.00028097795,0.055479486,0.9387068,0.000038985658,0.00014532762,0.00010614392,0.0022941732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000995761,0.0026148085,0.00027647513,0.045287974,0.943746,0.000041663112,0.000057783134,0.000067547786,0.006911964],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949527,0.0009783504,0.0007570863,0.00083418004,0.0021854956,0.0002922672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9581688,0.024897544,0.002101129,0.001043608,0.011640506,0.0021483358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007310297,0.0024446354,0.0030991843,0.0024029878,0.0024213733,0.0060476596,0.0039293203,0.020317903,0.017249033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04479852,0.0010703497,0.00262175,0.0011093266,0.00372095,0.0049196575,0.0014438006,0.02071515,0.02057296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041561838,0.0000139158565,0.000024803438,0.00019930875,0.00001089533,0.00009300203,0.000014525796,0.000037969654,0.000056425048,0.00043472272,0.9945174,0.004555508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005663967,0.000041389376,0.00029459712,0.0006080509,0.000028889948,0.0003009153,0.000043500884,0.0001761359,0.00017934252,0.0016352254,0.99660885,0.000026544529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013235292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017130857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020317903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023248696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025140988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057703733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401124985","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8892","title":"Commodity risk assessment of maple veneer sheets from Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Plant Pathogens and Resistance","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Food Inspection Agency","keywords":"Veneer; European union; Quarantine; Xylella fastidiosa; Materials science; Environmental science; Pulp and paper industry; Composite material; Horticulture; Business; Biology; Ecology; Engineering","score_opus":0.010837421928675916,"score_gpt":0.2139173886054821,"score_spread":0.20307996667680617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401124985","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9553409,0.0017162261,0.0031273062,0.00020501112,0.000023983284,0.00032155818,0.0060859513,0.00007429537,0.033104718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9743818,0.0013377167,0.0031822682,0.000049643488,0.0000038068372,0.000046624267,0.004995835,0.00002959557,0.01597259],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850607,0.00007109589,0.0000189061,0.00010224324,0.00109314,0.00020845927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891996,0.00011409773,0.00008413721,0.00004196064,0.00077581865,0.000063988926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007363033,0.0008372754,0.0002919969,0.0031807309,0.0016311109,0.002126018,0.00096903526,0.0005477987,0.002828137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009980738,0.00025970142,0.00081330724,0.0025240316,0.00040777618,0.00041558428,0.00082281395,0.0005843875,0.00031002588],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003301485,0.00064209703,0.37045687,0.0012846191,0.0008592297,0.007635393,0.0024126277,0.3142295,0.08134613,0.009865541,0.01659731,0.1913691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000070584974,0.0013536422,0.6886545,0.0004835583,0.00059860066,0.0010948024,0.0060736863,0.16265944,0.052717414,0.0026578188,0.08333097,0.00030487461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8834832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87901175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11651683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017439822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008879895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.234406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409482416","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9387","title":"Modification of the existing maximum residue levels and setting of import tolerances for trifloxystrobin in various crops","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Agricultural safety and regulations","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agriculture; Enforcement; Risk assessment; Agricultural science; Food safety; Toxicology; Business; Environmental science; Biology; Food science; Computer science","score_opus":0.030907117641313247,"score_gpt":0.26596454093346694,"score_spread":0.2350574232921537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409482416","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9063815,0.0012040833,0.048081372,0.0007749693,0.00016716435,0.0024048951,0.003941204,0.0006801511,0.036364593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90881354,0.00094339234,0.06801478,0.0007709693,0.000043673677,0.0029423689,0.004378622,0.00022688885,0.013865801],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99058086,0.0021455218,0.0010175009,0.0012125256,0.004271048,0.0007724533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99404514,0.0014361284,0.0012565611,0.0009602037,0.0021802895,0.00012167695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007439582,0.0005547027,0.00042554128,0.0013744608,0.0011221942,0.001222001,0.0015413007,0.0019596843,0.002174486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006658796,0.00039474005,0.00094938895,0.0009626659,0.0010424138,0.00073926465,0.0009499929,0.0012130615,0.00088248274],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009519617,0.00047492163,0.009132594,0.0005976048,0.00004449782,0.0005783518,0.0013485583,0.004024477,0.94305634,0.0037349653,0.0026877227,0.033367958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009750094,0.002917249,0.04380999,0.00032530734,0.00016304247,0.00072370155,0.0008043103,0.004460446,0.88472384,0.001825452,0.0600163,0.00013285785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004699059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009160287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007439582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017040547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019263999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039344728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415690571","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9740","title":"Prolonged multi‐country outbreak of Salmonella Strathcona ST2559 linked to consumption of tomatoes in the European Union/European Economic Area – first update, 23 October 2025","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Outbreak; Salmonella; Consumption (sociology); Salmonella Food Poisoning; Economic impact analysis; Food safety; European region; Public health","score_opus":0.03444977674407895,"score_gpt":0.2714176584164769,"score_spread":0.23696788167239796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415690571","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8633371,0.08317062,0.0024190575,0.0027514575,0.0013426833,0.00035836297,0.018676877,0.00028191853,0.027661944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9561076,0.019635439,0.0010199881,0.0013793883,0.00068434485,0.000041126452,0.018633837,0.000032655396,0.0024656442],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994448,0.00007274742,0.00013464988,0.000083969506,0.000177274,0.000086587985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906296,0.00016252433,0.0002722258,0.00005091907,0.00030195908,0.00014950582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011015969,0.000616876,0.00038582078,0.0014605124,0.00024960065,0.00095719687,0.00034876115,0.0011115691,0.0017446614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010544187,0.00032541662,0.00053183653,0.000896229,0.00024969966,0.0005008164,0.0005466145,0.0004405651,0.00056352327],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021409371,0.0003177541,0.7201301,0.00456899,0.0011040128,0.065452196,0.001727287,0.0014896223,0.009359142,0.0003316884,0.04715155,0.14622678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007805737,0.0004637242,0.88433146,0.0018195806,0.00039447978,0.027258435,0.0009775772,0.00040615394,0.0019077925,0.00007670259,0.08223077,0.000055352808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010388578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011528927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010388578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055172486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060584064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020656228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}