{"meta":{"query_hash":"6acc67146074","filters":{"venue":"EFSA Journal"},"cohort_total":53,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":53,"exported":53,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/6acc67146074","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=EFSA+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W2149663051","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3854","title":"Scientific Opinion on the pest categorisation of Rhagoletis cingulata (Loew)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Insect behavior and control techniques","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhagoletis; PEST analysis; Biology; European union; Tephritidae; Crop; Pest control; Integrated pest management; Toxicology; Agroforestry; Ecology; Horticulture; Business; International trade","score_opus":0.023056649162181853,"score_gpt":0.22529880354568246,"score_spread":0.2022421543835006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149663051","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960378,0.000045529516,0.000029268986,0.0014505049,0.00043541938,0.00007137985,0.000003770795,0.000020509327,0.0019058491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992276,0.00001708045,0.000020289956,0.00010876351,0.00044682078,0.000002880604,0.0000067534097,5.083945e-7,0.00016930907],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925154,0.00011483023,0.00016317856,0.00009996781,0.00024065729,0.00012984108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995662,0.000106765765,0.00012932663,0.000056031462,0.00010368211,0.000037971753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085285556,0.00006436207,0.00008206886,0.000014162363,0.00041079044,0.00013118799,0.00023607835,0.000042296975,0.0004876437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007335456,0.00001853676,0.00007416869,0.00012711121,0.00006384285,0.00006516052,0.000018936633,0.00015560702,0.00001677463],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023840912,0.00006938873,0.005719961,0.0000015467831,0.0000043666346,7.364275e-7,0.00014423057,0.0000013307041,0.73271054,0.008410629,0.007270818,0.24564263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001874808,0.000814967,0.8360005,0.00006520368,0.000011889646,0.00005473271,0.00014423074,0.00019601124,0.048491407,0.0060306867,0.10782069,0.00018218847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007235838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034958706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83028054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014223482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006085994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53393567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337151763","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3914","title":"Scientific Opinion on the pest categorisation of Rhagoletis ribicola","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Insect behavior and control techniques","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhagoletis; European union; PEST analysis; Biology; Quarantine; Tephritidae; Ribes; Ecology; Botany; Business; International trade","score_opus":0.02298719840994123,"score_gpt":0.22466653237332715,"score_spread":0.20167933396338592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337151763","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960583,0.000035102494,0.000024877476,0.0014993662,0.00040043832,0.00007531534,0.0000031663126,0.000018381557,0.0018850403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992959,0.000014814951,0.00001667294,0.0001125866,0.00039170985,0.000003903366,0.0000046483283,4.2271017e-7,0.00015933119],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992987,0.00012291317,0.0001479829,0.000087461405,0.00022421613,0.00011873647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999592,0.00010784583,0.00011849702,0.000043875523,0.000102086655,0.000035710345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008212824,0.000058040492,0.00007401118,0.000012676879,0.00039868816,0.00013583942,0.00020327482,0.000040217514,0.0004411724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000612044,0.000016254364,0.000072530005,0.00012450072,0.000060563252,0.000065165004,0.000014607833,0.00015126677,0.000018651332],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019451216,0.000069224276,0.0035938155,0.0000010122139,0.0000031160005,4.9193915e-7,0.00010621879,7.388887e-7,0.7791004,0.009137768,0.005559852,0.20240791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019229221,0.0010143197,0.7869412,0.000053605338,0.000010441352,0.00004707575,0.00013250043,0.00015570082,0.05989481,0.006103603,0.14528152,0.00017294193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000052579908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030003652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78334737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014316396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000059014374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48305285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2347205429","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3926","title":"Scientific Opinion on the pest categorisation of Atropellis spp","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Forest Insect Ecology and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; PEST analysis; European union; Introduced species; Botany; Ecology","score_opus":0.012134995047457586,"score_gpt":0.21456358985038468,"score_spread":0.2024285948029271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2347205429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95694983,0.000015978294,0.0014405532,0.0010335438,0.0014468837,0.00009404362,5.099471e-7,0.0000065109375,0.039012153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983092,0.000017546658,0.00010884057,0.00018044628,0.00009903033,0.0000016261935,0.0000013019403,0.0000033233284,0.0012787124],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993649,0.000092436,0.00012559128,0.00009176853,0.00020604135,0.000119236734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996556,0.000049730337,0.00010807492,0.00014450053,0.000007760774,0.00003431976],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009928211,0.00004826417,0.0000493237,0.000029495875,0.0003247724,0.00004317072,0.0002000724,0.000022756272,0.0039099045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000064146705,0.000029626854,0.000035586767,0.00010956861,0.00019247523,0.00009556271,0.000054767606,0.00012552842,0.0010549435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013154373,0.0005381395,0.12107575,0.000019553676,0.000064810556,0.0000078678895,0.0029024754,0.025797071,0.019866044,0.10920537,0.6518718,0.068519585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027127622,0.00031014142,0.60055023,0.0000133768035,0.000008112603,0.000025986938,0.00008926952,0.0018763294,0.0015090264,0.012534792,0.38271466,0.00009679363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000033860128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005694645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47947448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005291582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005329108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2399502854","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2010.e831","title":"Editorial: The new EFSA Journal web area","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Agricultural safety and regulations","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Office of the Chief Medical Examiner","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Web site; World Wide Web; Computer science; The Internet","score_opus":0.0074748506306513045,"score_gpt":0.20944840356429897,"score_spread":0.20197355293364766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2399502854","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010961405,0.0009147039,0.0000070002134,0.014738124,0.9820223,0.00018599996,0.00012789793,0.000054889948,0.00085297605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0004750268,0.0018830287,0.00006735002,0.00008506676,0.98567957,0.0000038697463,0.00021330739,0.0000046825858,0.011588075],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99587214,0.00027884022,0.0007940422,0.00034204233,0.0020038032,0.000709143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99592495,0.0013928062,0.001033238,0.000121287914,0.0008485756,0.0006791293],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001283767,0.0005058821,0.0005060561,0.000027686649,0.002910022,0.0013081313,0.0016470922,0.0018441037,0.0042229462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009604228,0.00012036335,0.0007468275,0.00040263287,0.00016766573,0.00040052691,0.00017885877,0.0075281607,0.00013218133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004331556,0.00003797817,0.000010268967,0.000001945009,0.00007445436,0.000014600873,0.000061288185,0.00000930891,0.004146123,0.000015092226,0.98222804,0.013357586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003255814,0.00020717192,0.0007399429,0.00009931185,0.00011568156,0.00041788968,0.0001366379,0.0000027744647,0.000021357057,0.0013476191,0.9961804,0.00040562055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011350293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014337783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014653058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013383155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004341383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793372631","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5184","title":"Pest categorisation of Anisogramma anomala","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Insect-Plant Interactions and Control","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Art history; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.014486195087143812,"score_gpt":0.23043066082740124,"score_spread":0.21594446574025744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793372631","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9773536,0.0017140788,0.00013879774,0.0070645763,0.0043500946,0.00007459532,0.000034832712,0.000009435025,0.009260031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838319,0.00026805725,0.0001193049,0.00016680345,0.005723111,0.0000012722757,0.0000073951246,0.0000010912983,0.009881056],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989979,0.000120822595,0.00032268235,0.00011730949,0.00017362657,0.00026763848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991784,0.000089791276,0.00027059804,0.000037769507,0.00031431793,0.00010910016],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000294284,0.00010866061,0.00015319574,0.000023484352,0.00038243327,0.00013362215,0.00016833376,0.000111217545,0.012757762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038955463,0.000047966998,0.00014052972,0.00018555565,0.00015472928,0.00024314622,0.00001950576,0.00022718242,0.0002854201],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020986101,0.0004427062,0.022667574,0.000013990326,0.000107190164,0.000046447905,0.0007363839,0.000004841265,0.2296723,0.011823844,0.032327123,0.70194775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047982225,0.003182408,0.17906277,0.00014390313,0.00008539604,0.0023482977,0.0014104414,0.0007285694,0.007965695,0.0041121636,0.8001921,0.00028843744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010107794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006859865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.767865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040781626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032503547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9881447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809587194","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5300","title":"Pest categorisation of non‐EU Pissodes spp.","year":2018,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Forest Insect Ecology and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Curculionidae; PEST analysis; Quarantine; Bark beetle; European union; Bark (sound); Botany; Deciduous; Longhorn beetle; Larva; Pupa; Ecology; Horticulture","score_opus":0.008496944788362925,"score_gpt":0.24076763744281185,"score_spread":0.2322706926544489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809587194","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9608214,0.00009826905,0.0013368619,0.00058135984,0.0013978322,0.00012844677,0.0000036735792,0.000007895104,0.035624254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99642974,0.0002826694,0.00075574993,0.00027682883,0.0005940282,0.0000019868614,0.0000014914493,0.000011008874,0.0016465193],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988338,0.000080572834,0.0003382234,0.00016873916,0.00027724038,0.00030146522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933136,0.000033329517,0.00031450318,0.00017977186,0.000029653647,0.00011136994],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006194695,0.000133066,0.00016390443,0.0000784624,0.0003464606,0.0000582785,0.00029713346,0.00010126315,0.0141989365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043955737,0.00011731028,0.000079839454,0.00017003923,0.0005529573,0.000270575,0.00013637159,0.00023386766,0.002469914],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034073,0.0011564608,0.67371535,0.00014690562,0.00036236885,0.0001489738,0.0059931264,0.0010313902,0.07489085,0.008738669,0.17786148,0.055613685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000432796,0.00071751873,0.94586504,0.0000430827,0.000056645105,0.00009706506,0.00018828052,0.0006601207,0.0046085673,0.0020869705,0.045099787,0.00014414411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020750536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018990698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27214968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014211316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003126555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99830675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2880032881","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5345","title":"Technical Note on the quality of DNA sequencing for the molecular characterisation of genetically modified plants","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council; European Commission; European Food Safety Authority","keywords":"Insert (composites); Context (archaeology); DNA sequencing; European commission; Biotechnology; Genetically modified organism; Reference genome; Computational biology; Biology; Genetics; DNA; Engineering; European union; Business; Gene","score_opus":0.10156690642728669,"score_gpt":0.3277787624586173,"score_spread":0.22621185603133062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2880032881","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98999405,0.00002847645,0.0054452266,0.003905726,0.000064485044,0.00027332324,0.0000249014,0.0000057080383,0.00025808567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987822,0.000025777521,0.00070530805,0.00020516836,0.00025285516,0.000007377879,0.0000024081016,0.0000012768028,0.00001758189],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985517,0.00022075202,0.00038158405,0.00012832484,0.0004972659,0.00022031783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839455,0.0009914126,0.0001919028,0.000102836086,0.00025457228,0.000064738655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016852883,0.00008260976,0.00014667842,0.000010812039,0.000235519,0.000039648054,0.00049267546,0.000082082996,0.00021957603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006172002,0.00002289731,0.00011033206,0.00011195131,0.00025751526,0.00002246497,0.000066462126,0.00020850888,0.000005599667],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011731766,0.00002809161,0.000056374927,0.0000027220403,0.000008561713,4.7724427e-7,0.000055955945,0.000013000197,0.9764772,0.0022497163,0.000046694626,0.020943904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016236199,0.000804904,0.17437127,0.000024264782,0.000010122853,0.000017805529,0.00010797583,0.00073016295,0.82002145,0.0033628354,0.00030883326,0.000078013814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000032359356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034097615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1743149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026621534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004095373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24042036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909859134","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5513","title":"Pest categorisation of Pseudopityophthorus minutissimus and P. pruinosus","year":2019,"lang":"ca","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Research on scale insects","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"PEST analysis; Chemistry; Biology; Botany","score_opus":0.014898438920030923,"score_gpt":0.24372656011414792,"score_spread":0.228828121194117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2909859134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9898143,0.0034263565,0.0000027185838,0.002354569,0.00081348844,0.00026742154,0.000018462753,0.000007941267,0.0032947739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99440145,0.0016218758,0.000074120406,0.000046269655,0.00077512994,0.0000013867595,0.0000047805224,0.0000021746368,0.0030728227],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977689,0.00032393888,0.0004704766,0.0002828909,0.00069461105,0.00045919197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858516,0.000344499,0.00036159824,0.000090754016,0.0002585165,0.00035944433],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009409819,0.00018189194,0.0003248905,0.000051563686,0.00021803933,0.00026062902,0.00033985585,0.00018299294,0.0027567304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002133169,0.000078779056,0.0001298594,0.00031707733,0.0001742381,0.0003261048,0.0001223756,0.00054180395,0.00013666556],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024459203,0.00030120846,0.36879206,0.0001295167,0.000119960576,0.00015545492,0.0007758135,0.000016991367,0.4246051,0.0007809446,0.0059258435,0.19815251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062134716,0.0017301709,0.97804344,0.00012401724,0.00002590743,0.00080287486,0.0007647536,0.00024132027,0.003951977,0.0019099326,0.011540895,0.00024338724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000302844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000046604226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6092514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006415787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000074446274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2920583144","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5617","title":"Pest categorisation of Arrhenodes minutus","year":2019,"lang":"lt","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Research on scale insects","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"PEST analysis; Biology; Zoology; Food science; Botany","score_opus":0.031112796760564804,"score_gpt":0.2631353587748391,"score_spread":0.23202256201427432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2920583144","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9881925,0.0016035701,0.000005928883,0.0025266905,0.0010004627,0.00018794945,0.00001681882,0.000008801817,0.0064572976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926659,0.0007456409,0.00007735881,0.00006337495,0.0011948895,0.0000011816539,0.00000684535,0.000002009853,0.005242787],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770117,0.00030117313,0.0004871013,0.00023014878,0.0008113088,0.0004690851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860066,0.00031315643,0.00038728522,0.000093476156,0.0003309342,0.00027448963],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010199415,0.00016149024,0.00029539195,0.000047565893,0.00018743235,0.000218556,0.00050770916,0.0001556388,0.008356427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021195515,0.00006492086,0.00021023498,0.00036354648,0.00012332227,0.00033984982,0.0000846907,0.00052668253,0.00073398865],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020707549,0.00026957408,0.125923,0.000060648315,0.00010283532,0.000075687894,0.0008255417,0.00004865351,0.7447167,0.0006680383,0.009662769,0.117439464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009086633,0.0023949402,0.9209567,0.00023792105,0.000037547074,0.00054795225,0.0026533732,0.0004236432,0.021844251,0.004491133,0.0450494,0.0004544965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003701883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000105534724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7950337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008684534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008174205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9925501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2937027379","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5660","title":"Setting an import tolerance for 2,4‐D in soyabeans","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metabolite; Residue (chemistry); Biotechnology; Biology; Agricultural science; Biochemistry","score_opus":0.02004021530721093,"score_gpt":0.26463646080203634,"score_spread":0.24459624549482542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2937027379","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99771255,0.000053351498,0.00003071642,0.0013861817,0.00012855466,0.00018898457,0.0000056957683,0.0000104392275,0.00048351008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99790335,0.00001164623,0.0010896103,0.00018186726,0.00037766885,0.000004505847,0.0000055702626,0.0000010701607,0.0004246993],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990182,0.000055486507,0.00019447792,0.00016572297,0.00021236463,0.0003537354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996202,0.000098823984,0.000046830053,0.000039259758,0.00006125327,0.00013362853],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006777869,0.00007095703,0.00010632674,0.000013436081,0.0001073455,0.000103471146,0.00026672537,0.00005811706,0.0011359403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048859394,0.000027118855,0.000051632243,0.00012336667,0.000015507847,0.000118181946,0.00003313076,0.00022697602,0.000049683393],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041535717,0.00007004046,0.101248644,0.000004674129,0.0000035072603,0.000009216055,0.000105923966,0.0001689318,0.83025014,0.000108538254,0.00034899107,0.06763984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058043236,0.00082961575,0.9665946,0.000030202647,0.000002597697,0.000104521365,0.0004675916,0.0021930335,0.01110523,0.0021729264,0.01569361,0.00022565905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002471708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016489017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86534595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023553028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023521901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2957606809","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2019.e170704","title":"Managing evidence in food safety and nutrition","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Research Data Management Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Ottawa","funders":"U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Food safety; Interoperability; Session (web analytics); Scientific evidence; Business; Risk analysis (engineering); Risk management; Computer science; Biology; Food science","score_opus":0.09363387886976851,"score_gpt":0.35165015852805837,"score_spread":0.2580162796582899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2957606809","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1878506,0.006960339,0.7446375,0.04739161,0.00078449224,0.00068860163,0.0000016793915,0.00006343158,0.011621742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9644197,0.01769247,0.016896682,0.0002669685,0.00009745395,0.0000034718528,5.2791233e-7,0.000005283011,0.0006174251],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988984,0.0001668706,0.0001683016,0.00020306086,0.0003507533,0.0002126451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928427,0.00022688256,0.00008933551,0.00029531875,0.000032211166,0.000071999224],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019078904,0.000054871387,0.00007748417,0.00022838713,0.00007732344,0.0018303712,0.00087745005,0.000015632335,0.000031596563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021142217,0.000049829025,0.00001601496,0.00027434816,0.000013642464,0.027820015,0.0004807083,0.00029927466,0.00003472926],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041554798,0.0003813438,0.06474486,0.0006399267,0.000118922675,0.00078527885,0.0014165206,0.00042336134,0.0027178957,0.46844053,0.0037939781,0.45612183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0064710006,0.002712603,0.34832135,0.004246221,0.000017556771,0.0017991476,0.0010024658,0.113396786,0.0008337215,0.068559386,0.45159075,0.0010490026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008905265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011544905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7765691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053592023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025805146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2960634915","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2019.e170707","title":"Conducting fit‐for‐purpose food safety risk assessments","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Food Inspection Agency","funders":"","keywords":"Food safety; Agency (philosophy); Food inspection; Political science; Management; Library science; Sociology; Medicine; Social science; Economics","score_opus":0.12009201491730244,"score_gpt":0.3218922221959085,"score_spread":0.2018002072786061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2960634915","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99700594,0.00010770593,0.00016535376,0.0006165386,0.00036242386,0.00027987678,0.00004203535,0.000019549861,0.0014005724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964636,0.00007689933,0.0017562105,0.00009083339,0.0005087048,0.0000038871117,0.000008113131,0.0000017426883,0.0010900372],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985722,0.0001515898,0.0002541037,0.00021438954,0.00038149414,0.00042625266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912685,0.00033083805,0.00012779667,0.000057810666,0.00015595231,0.00020074853],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008852156,0.00011067971,0.0001546614,0.000014100361,0.00039485673,0.00019180434,0.0003526866,0.00008723023,0.0034179508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016476196,0.000041155068,0.000114929855,0.00015176178,0.000028550401,0.00012227555,0.00009448208,0.00043211668,0.00018180317],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013987685,0.00014862017,0.054305423,0.000010614978,0.00008781132,0.0000059962213,0.0000858534,0.000096760654,0.65329534,0.0004020422,0.0014282168,0.28999346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027637165,0.0076292506,0.71507543,0.000087934546,0.000063477884,0.00037276905,0.0021207437,0.00094971893,0.05185244,0.00738606,0.21079084,0.0009075998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001902265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000037887043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66077006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043612625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032249343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2960707212","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2019.e170718","title":"Responding to globalised food‐borne disease: risk assessment as post‐normal science","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Unintended consequences; Context (archaeology); Globalization; Business; Food security; International trade; Disease; Public economics; Economics; Political science; Medicine; Agriculture; Psychology; Biology; Social psychology; Market economy","score_opus":0.013613036693829624,"score_gpt":0.27981429769123856,"score_spread":0.26620126099740893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2960707212","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9738727,0.0001233294,0.00001990095,0.010466975,0.00042431706,0.0002133939,0.000041743813,0.00003824408,0.014799364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952006,0.000046029312,0.0002265458,0.002676639,0.00037194765,0.0000044499207,0.000010371662,0.0000011243903,0.0014623257],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980524,0.00019767154,0.0002801304,0.0003697382,0.00050821586,0.00059179816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987394,0.00013800175,0.00017059552,0.00008498396,0.00015377435,0.00071325095],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017234896,0.00015193071,0.00018611914,0.000093747476,0.0006545106,0.000285735,0.00064216513,0.0000383928,0.0036050915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049295666,0.00006037501,0.00014828506,0.00095544755,0.00008498188,0.0004448678,0.00028743927,0.0002334504,0.00056715077],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011116118,0.00019695652,0.8054443,0.000010133162,0.00007421111,0.000079661724,0.00007731793,0.0002680736,0.09003763,0.05672017,0.0117185,0.03426143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017280184,0.0009285096,0.9588304,0.000026156928,0.000022897277,0.0000106451525,0.0002476167,0.00015211565,0.000030879895,0.0019781115,0.037424397,0.000175462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000039557017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017681752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1533861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011568714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000673522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99730575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2961589517","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2019.e170719","title":"Integrating nutrition science and consumer behaviour into future food policy","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Culinary Culture and Tourism","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"European Food Safety Authority","keywords":"Food science; Business; Marketing; Biotechnology; Biology","score_opus":0.009266030601298722,"score_gpt":0.23281915467926595,"score_spread":0.22355312407796724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2961589517","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903704,0.00078685617,0.0000010292995,0.0070838,0.0002858417,0.00010049471,0.0000040653135,0.000015429901,0.0013521083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99699885,0.00015452264,0.00030322996,0.0003238999,0.002001033,0.0000019970817,0.0000035598052,5.4407724e-7,0.00021237679],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992006,0.000029090166,0.0001344246,0.00016039249,0.00027008596,0.0002054163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995291,0.000023769822,0.00007870099,0.000028447139,0.00019393215,0.00014600989],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032102678,0.00008926962,0.00009936714,0.000027477043,0.00048820366,0.0002566728,0.00017185873,0.00006048733,0.0002638862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004786537,0.000030538584,0.00004359328,0.000368235,0.0001004669,0.0003882529,0.000055787892,0.00027200498,0.000023475142],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004341491,0.00022236294,0.05836445,0.000016745074,0.000020301322,0.000029117416,0.0016480603,2.3575572e-7,0.63957113,0.0065276655,0.009618468,0.28393802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012848885,0.0026969486,0.539051,0.00024678427,0.000038840557,0.0027887733,0.011867357,0.00003926742,0.009967745,0.016332224,0.4149932,0.0006929697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000077287084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012549404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6296034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045228535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036137404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3754917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964063645","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5759","title":"Modification of the existing maximum residue levels and setting of import tolerances for oxathiapiprolin in various commodities","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Agricultural safety and regulations","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Residue (chemistry); Enforcement; Business; Agricultural science; China; Risk assessment; Biotechnology; Environmental science; Computer science; Chemistry; Biology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03533272730241994,"score_gpt":0.2468713717814146,"score_spread":0.21153864447899468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964063645","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99735224,0.00021037365,0.000025294088,0.0018707864,0.00008350441,0.00018390792,0.000024682075,0.0000030432725,0.00024616154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99941564,0.000014822736,0.00034104093,0.000018470044,0.000092774084,0.0000027700883,0.0000047113795,3.5727908e-7,0.000109391],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993949,0.00004898628,0.00027839656,0.00007186658,0.00010803075,0.00009782553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994222,0.00017920476,0.0002853477,0.00002381824,0.00007076694,0.00001869253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037740605,0.000052708,0.00012264724,0.000006974076,0.00016315501,0.000015237998,0.00011690974,0.000046292513,0.000023674991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036679783,0.000015625588,0.000054099055,0.00011670504,0.000040451716,0.000117760916,0.000026182559,0.00009718416,1.7115127e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010096015,0.00009299793,0.5333244,0.00008966289,0.000028056907,5.1643855e-7,0.0025570507,0.001897647,0.3910678,0.006355681,0.00016479123,0.06432042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013898339,0.000053975207,0.98873323,0.000086533335,0.00000496297,0.000022886272,0.0008498557,0.0004816775,0.0027548247,0.0064903055,0.0003343272,0.000048436024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000102538565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003540426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4554088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010001764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008602706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12548728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035943817","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6133","title":"Setting of import tolerances, modification of existing maximum residue levels and evaluation of confirmatory data following the Article 12 MRL review for flupyradifurone and DFA","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Agricultural safety and regulations","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"European commission; Agricultural science; European union; Residue (chemistry); Biotechnology; Toxicology; Mathematics; Business; Biology","score_opus":0.2681984734134516,"score_gpt":0.3486233364624546,"score_spread":0.08042486304900298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035943817","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.977763,0.014299406,0.000102664315,0.0073857782,0.00002974745,0.00031076616,0.00005205353,0.000003331525,0.000053229367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988342,0.000572507,0.0003893697,0.00006821444,0.00009885526,0.000002957907,0.000029103725,4.9344715e-7,0.0000042767315],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909574,0.00011039115,0.00038867994,0.00010389784,0.00022557506,0.00007569737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920475,0.0001756188,0.00039461523,0.00004285187,0.00013985834,0.000042278003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014739913,0.000053842767,0.00016007054,0.000003196757,0.00018522356,0.00001175918,0.00012916418,0.000026203825,0.000020612852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026070199,0.000018393075,0.000041633866,0.000104851846,0.000045899607,0.00020895453,0.000044160995,0.000062659776,7.8839236e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056763045,0.000050626044,0.023218174,0.0005319556,0.00010693151,5.184278e-7,0.0013911087,0.00028567028,0.65592724,0.00046954324,0.0011765646,0.3167849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050173554,0.00014082067,0.9680818,0.00086925115,0.00030159095,0.000039724062,0.0013095081,0.019950371,0.006189168,0.0010377801,0.0014565666,0.000121715275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015200079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025884328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9448636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000052503456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014521416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14246085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123256566","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6374","title":"Reasoned opinion on the toxicological properties and maximum residue levels for propoxur","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Agricultural safety and regulations","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Propoxur; Member states; European commission; Reference values; Risk assessment; European union; Environmental health; Toxicology; Business; Pesticide; Biology; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.11105889405071277,"score_gpt":0.24327690574981634,"score_spread":0.13221801169910358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123256566","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9044256,0.0007384702,0.000016697368,0.09382175,0.00019887606,0.0002393649,0.000018068244,0.000018787889,0.00052235485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967461,0.00020977482,0.0001850008,0.00056260405,0.00083115266,0.000016725808,0.00001208942,5.626347e-7,0.0014359945],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927354,0.0001217507,0.00014654962,0.00013961788,0.00014327402,0.00017529394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994834,0.00020310823,0.0000672298,0.000026627617,0.00014646801,0.00007315025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024834197,0.00008689413,0.00009855185,0.0000029413704,0.0009448905,0.00012932403,0.00010589308,0.000079187506,0.00032680127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022112917,0.000018403673,0.00006907404,0.00013073238,0.000066210625,0.00008059394,0.000041451647,0.00016527966,0.0000057936923],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003341939,0.000312338,0.0013477356,0.000015003974,0.00007959752,0.000022426715,0.0003530059,0.000050063045,0.7815275,0.021092648,0.029362423,0.16550305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031906538,0.000763223,0.79288155,0.00012427806,0.000013018104,0.0005818314,0.0015915135,0.00006710952,0.021113098,0.010001556,0.17230523,0.00023850621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003796623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000049898597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7915338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001742446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014824677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7267429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135265863","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6459","title":"Monitoring of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in mustelids","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Food Inspection Agency","keywords":"Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Virology; Biology; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Sars virus; Zoology; Medicine; Internal medicine; Outbreak","score_opus":0.07804751524370275,"score_gpt":0.40599228627084477,"score_spread":0.32794477102714203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135265863","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99512315,0.00095629704,0.00015333653,0.00022038963,0.0004831319,0.000049968385,3.190941e-7,0.000009282262,0.0030041134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99756235,0.00009629589,0.00027236293,0.0012643998,0.0007491458,0.0000022679153,1.983213e-7,0.000011637224,0.000041365034],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989821,0.00007335679,0.00026675122,0.00010498175,0.0003665873,0.0002062419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995149,0.000054816956,0.00005973262,0.00013165183,0.00021116734,0.000027732105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041886006,0.00006955638,0.00018768176,0.00022605338,0.000043786444,0.000028044975,0.000049961047,0.00007196854,0.00002853251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033394614,0.000062179795,0.0000934963,0.00039001167,0.000024896355,0.000096000316,0.00003598322,0.0005586975,0.000018759556],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005674082,0.000087489905,0.62437695,0.00004307997,0.000022998262,0.0004725638,0.00019202814,0.0000013146176,0.36385247,0.0000069466937,0.0001280941,0.010759289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011719472,0.000119559416,0.27812502,0.00030850462,0.000014517022,0.0008901582,0.00012743776,0.000042081312,0.70360327,0.00011022528,0.015437646,0.000049614973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012217787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030672527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34625193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001448594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033782856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25356182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3142050569","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6553","title":"General scientific guidance for stakeholders on health claim applications (Revision 1)1","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling","field":"Medicine","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Novelis (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); European commission; Health claims on food labels; Commission; Medicine; Set (abstract data type); Public relations; Political science; Law; Business; Computer science; European union","score_opus":0.11511883937939169,"score_gpt":0.3739088036314186,"score_spread":0.25878996425202694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3142050569","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31156886,0.20379359,0.3382183,0.13444066,0.0046662255,0.0032600898,0.00016513154,0.0002015884,0.0036855412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86250263,0.002149765,0.11268464,0.009101478,0.0027791392,0.00007763005,0.00017129791,0.000084861145,0.010448568],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894077,0.000030716554,0.0003026538,0.00022220353,0.00025158038,0.00025210483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909604,0.00004219252,0.00011679096,0.0002423371,0.00027070596,0.00023192714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005573267,0.00008401934,0.00017939645,0.00007845996,0.0005608646,0.000117403426,0.00007096945,0.000030580075,0.00017752065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006446934,0.000071907445,0.00012617248,0.00020058939,0.000035432775,0.00004536994,0.000018223383,0.00023388109,0.000020508074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001439505,0.00050741393,0.0020076104,0.0003303438,0.00024236109,0.0000456095,0.0004024628,0.00022365093,0.018960405,0.0052706786,0.09625123,0.8756143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016723472,0.0002803701,0.0021580704,0.0004415706,0.000083734056,0.00043310862,0.00012148232,0.0007866952,0.0015439297,0.00043493952,0.9919237,0.000120083736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002589901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014311092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89567244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011066909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005183964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43137735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3142516488","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6543","title":"Guidance on the preparation and presentation of applications for exemption from mandatory labelling of food allergens and/or products thereof pursuant to Article 21 (2) of Regulation (EU) No 1169/20111","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Agricultural safety and regulations","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Novelis (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"European commission; European union; Presentation (obstetrics); Business; Labelling; Commission; Medicine; Risk analysis (engineering); Biotechnology; Marketing; Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Biology; Finance; Surgery; International trade","score_opus":0.03321743017273942,"score_gpt":0.2530053048028976,"score_spread":0.2197878746301582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3142516488","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99618316,0.00024376268,0.00063973013,0.0023637721,0.000040507173,0.00042379717,0.000055590455,0.000004112702,0.000045557706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99811065,0.00013122943,0.001293286,0.000023852072,0.00018346937,0.000024234823,0.000039609695,7.328008e-7,0.00019295342],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993399,0.00006543941,0.00026833545,0.000121264544,0.00013605396,0.0000690254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991343,0.00019279722,0.00024014796,0.000046976376,0.00035296672,0.000032832562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020000673,0.000055812834,0.000097751836,0.000007370809,0.00017144768,0.000015947966,0.00005394531,0.000036949954,0.00009084305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008611758,0.000019725388,0.000031640004,0.00015203792,0.000037658385,0.00010450319,0.000018830071,0.000039249488,8.996867e-7],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017216423,0.00007895284,0.0005914226,0.000014757021,0.000026684078,4.491603e-8,0.00040181432,0.0003873818,0.99018586,0.0019357605,0.00040736515,0.0057977987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029203622,0.00071794045,0.5245769,0.00012162965,0.000046230216,0.0000075546345,0.0008647276,0.00078879436,0.46253067,0.0036990829,0.0062520746,0.00010238449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015894395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013017135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5276552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008305494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010597546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13186543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200221854","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2021.7022","title":"Pest categorisation of Xylotrechus chinensis","year":2021,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Research on scale insects","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alpha Technologies (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"PEST analysis; Frass; Longhorn beetle; Biology; Bark (sound); European union; Larva; Voltinism; Botany; Pheromone trap; Horticulture; Ecology","score_opus":0.03606308971072628,"score_gpt":0.27590715993892556,"score_spread":0.23984407022819929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200221854","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9752746,0.011140646,0.000023464421,0.008907914,0.0021816806,0.00007572318,0.000026176782,0.000010607457,0.002359157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900359,0.0038492044,0.00018950985,0.000120113975,0.0038707044,0.0000011151134,0.000023929217,0.0000019364734,0.0019076165],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974902,0.0004886275,0.000566441,0.00024031229,0.0008075121,0.00040686692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828947,0.00033973643,0.00034229126,0.00009178908,0.00062375783,0.00031296283],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008694251,0.00015253201,0.0003131577,0.00003375462,0.00029316806,0.00023723142,0.00031829748,0.00015717845,0.0051177745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00095387176,0.000064676315,0.00024904817,0.0006369403,0.000122141,0.00019249028,0.00010457498,0.0006124227,0.00021869641],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110638684,0.0006311412,0.047891915,0.000041275995,0.00029198846,0.0006540634,0.0009061891,0.000046912657,0.523072,0.00048278883,0.037377294,0.38849378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000751177,0.0010099865,0.77642494,0.00019478152,0.00011748878,0.0007033627,0.0018573927,0.0004278952,0.06942497,0.0051838346,0.14345896,0.0004452064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018017006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021562519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.728533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000074628784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015715383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200423674","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6970","title":"Scientific Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR Panel) on testing and interpretation of comparative in vitro metabolism studies","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Agricultural safety and regulations","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"In vivo; Metabolite; Animal testing; In vitro toxicology; In vitro; Pharmacology; Toxicity; Biochemical engineering; Toxicology; Biology; Biotechnology; Computational biology; Chemistry; Biochemistry; Ecology","score_opus":0.1458747886022418,"score_gpt":0.2681474338392868,"score_spread":0.12227264523704501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200423674","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963938,0.0011147975,0.0000011196479,0.0018419431,0.0003970939,0.00019513183,0.000027156218,0.0000042682345,0.00002467461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996957,0.00004439747,0.00006092207,0.000007810586,0.00009549078,0.000003820698,0.000010379343,3.633006e-7,0.00008107212],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990838,0.00021881904,0.0002315675,0.0001902801,0.00017743242,0.00009807453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917847,0.00023133725,0.00022574274,0.000035939134,0.0003043431,0.000024195386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047482486,0.00008322846,0.000168151,0.000025866157,0.0005806704,0.00009083809,0.00007055282,0.000029951461,0.000002295707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028044675,0.00002352067,0.000031162475,0.0005677056,0.00034696425,0.00013117296,0.00005177807,0.00015187911,2.3517192e-7],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094584866,0.000071347444,0.0005208255,0.00001687069,0.00001851622,4.572018e-7,0.0035299684,0.00019913928,0.9677411,0.00012977705,0.00005407164,0.027623357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013197023,0.00012359221,0.65211475,0.0004204537,0.000008329926,0.00004911292,0.0057023005,0.00043425,0.3396745,0.0010008534,0.0002682938,0.00007158607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019277799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016577079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6515939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016046313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016019238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4466106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205157324","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7067","title":"Assessment of the control measures for category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Contagious Bovine Pleuropneumonia","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Microbial infections and disease research","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alpha Technologies (Canada)","funders":"European Food Safety Authority","keywords":"Contagious bovine pleuropneumonia; Pleuropneumonia; Animal health; Veterinary medicine; Biology; Medicine; Virology","score_opus":0.018597572994391864,"score_gpt":0.3143355343454345,"score_spread":0.29573796135104263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205157324","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.965836,0.022842504,0.001614749,0.0039032525,0.0013215365,0.0012643628,0.0026683845,0.000025419566,0.00052381045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99931836,0.0000632928,0.000011663218,0.000338955,0.00004014199,0.000035096586,0.000017366872,0.00001114794,0.00016398527],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838084,0.00075037667,0.00038699992,0.00011735312,0.00009475923,0.0002696838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991122,0.00015705414,0.00033206475,0.0001709377,0.00017883407,0.000048902253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006518749,0.00009119673,0.00029258034,0.000078601566,0.0008154491,0.0000125719325,0.00023747573,0.000027947577,0.00068780896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006298093,0.00006446359,0.00026082067,0.000097087475,0.0001906489,0.000034178644,0.000098851924,0.0003724694,0.0000011990148],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015070753,0.001135576,0.021708177,0.00009501725,0.0005918542,0.000005839159,0.00016102263,0.00021660654,0.9333585,0.017988956,0.022018937,0.001212427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.034093816,0.021847622,0.5776598,0.00018835427,0.00084876997,0.002936886,0.0024486687,0.00024742878,0.032139216,0.003372615,0.32337898,0.0008378424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041010996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000051630766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9012193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000110585315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078900694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75310254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205176351","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7070","title":"Assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Rift Valley Fever","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Viral Infections and Vectors","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alpha Technologies (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Rift Valley fever; Veterinary medicine; Medicine; Biology; Virology; Outbreak","score_opus":0.029138355824228104,"score_gpt":0.3193232072574142,"score_spread":0.2901848514331861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205176351","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9921301,0.0015593712,0.00015112924,0.004248651,0.000476744,0.00030559994,0.000063528576,0.000005269606,0.001059599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99921846,0.000027046175,0.000018546632,0.00054244045,0.000089837835,0.0000057688812,5.5796426e-7,0.000007817719,0.0000895113],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986089,0.0003572645,0.00034858513,0.00006287697,0.000502893,0.00011947076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916774,0.000045934423,0.00041273044,0.00018860327,0.00011578254,0.00006922586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053039874,0.00006683463,0.0002585065,0.00004323104,0.0002973197,0.000004880546,0.00013236169,0.0000149718,0.00039126645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004991488,0.000034219887,0.00026752526,0.00014807706,0.00010678472,0.00003048142,0.000058085836,0.0003649809,1.2589213e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029842378,0.0012206857,0.957847,0.00013109198,0.0005072957,0.000005782054,0.00056783675,0.001308788,0.020374514,0.008636672,0.008350627,0.0007512594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001444383,0.00089710375,0.9929667,0.000060855127,0.000144372,0.00013258614,0.00035291427,0.00015839469,0.0004976873,0.00017651559,0.0031325663,0.000035923633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005665597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000058018755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035119675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009824464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061346526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4284093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205438236","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7069","title":"Assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Burkholderia mallei (Glanders)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Burkholderia infections and melioidosis","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alpha Technologies (Canada)","funders":"European Food Safety Authority","keywords":"Burkholderia; Biology; Environmental health; Law; Medicine; Political science; Genetics; Bacteria","score_opus":0.029894864314438892,"score_gpt":0.2995316749373904,"score_spread":0.26963681062295153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205438236","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9846445,0.0027798351,0.00045457509,0.008620382,0.0010442042,0.0006266002,0.00010868197,0.000009995494,0.0017112364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989524,0.0000830546,0.00004052633,0.00065506826,0.00014623853,0.000019063777,0.0000014668537,0.000013401232,0.00008880826],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998157,0.00039737884,0.0005057488,0.000101244055,0.0006586245,0.0001799549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987356,0.00006656405,0.0006203827,0.00030951083,0.00016310917,0.000104841114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072256837,0.00010307955,0.0003897434,0.00007018209,0.00038981394,0.0000089152745,0.00020318302,0.000026690786,0.0006141213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006033297,0.000057110195,0.00034578986,0.00022370998,0.00015797872,0.00003817101,0.00008909891,0.00042615473,1.2101485e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001326696,0.0032477335,0.779188,0.0005988458,0.0015111619,0.0000148851295,0.0014854803,0.0013911354,0.16599545,0.019410027,0.022663422,0.0031671969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0046655694,0.0015892698,0.9786046,0.00017724818,0.00040267617,0.00046067993,0.0016809476,0.00012909679,0.0031216515,0.00029030078,0.0087869335,0.00009100603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050729787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004790445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19941665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016361174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084225205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6724198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205443971","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7024","title":"Pest categorisation of Maconellicoccus hirsutus","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Research on scale insects","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alpha Technologies (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; PEST analysis; Ornamental plant; Hibiscus; Quarantine; Phytosanitary certification; Subtropics; Horticulture; Botany; Ecology","score_opus":0.03569355742599646,"score_gpt":0.26604151121172404,"score_spread":0.2303479537857276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205443971","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95877105,0.010652941,0.000016963893,0.023545315,0.002725852,0.00014347152,0.000078361394,0.0000100918205,0.004055925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97945654,0.0009946186,0.00006213956,0.00017481037,0.0015173804,0.00000772287,0.000011703017,0.0000019897416,0.017773118],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972713,0.00074065704,0.00043188813,0.00018980671,0.00090329413,0.00046304325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889857,0.00026922236,0.0003264987,0.00006324573,0.00017466718,0.00026779715],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014426953,0.00012456464,0.00020666877,0.000045768455,0.00072413543,0.000117181924,0.0005235681,0.000068790156,0.039843626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014204952,0.000061623374,0.00019392409,0.00055810116,0.00017317008,0.00021993376,0.00021301422,0.00084897265,0.000109518274],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025691927,0.00082682114,0.02664149,0.00003807571,0.00012680537,0.0004406616,0.0011925373,0.0010572795,0.29820737,0.0062649744,0.11169172,0.5532554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007049227,0.0027875302,0.20994093,0.000039684346,0.000043849326,0.0018692771,0.0034881528,0.00082780945,0.0058999583,0.014296558,0.7597283,0.0003730032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009162486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000094351366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6480366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022762985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009878816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96103406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205771890","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7122","title":"Avian influenza overview May – September 2021","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Influenza Virus Research Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alpha Technologies (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Influenza A virus subtype H5N1; Overwintering; Highly pathogenic; Virus; Biology; Waterfowl; Influenza A virus; Reassortment; Poultry farming; Bird migration; Veterinary medicine; Virology; Geography; Zoology; Ecology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Medicine","score_opus":0.13722491809711007,"score_gpt":0.42738393829374616,"score_spread":0.2901590201966361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205771890","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66668415,0.08408795,0.0000549661,0.011297305,0.0021080151,0.0010603743,0.00008736131,0.000110818764,0.23450907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7436991,0.0070292223,0.0042934706,0.073649384,0.008493907,0.0003979197,0.00003675763,0.00034656926,0.16205372],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99748135,0.00026782768,0.0003920281,0.0001914908,0.0011417603,0.00052553916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899656,0.00007820086,0.0001284847,0.00028626737,0.00020235765,0.00030814647],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011574823,0.00016315009,0.00033990302,0.0002199198,0.0008534188,0.00006072373,0.00020515495,0.00003652025,0.04208603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002483365,0.00013507849,0.00022417381,0.00037723657,0.00007893394,0.00013383795,0.00038800013,0.0014212072,0.0007250973],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010471181,0.0006417817,0.18635255,0.00022860685,0.0012062606,0.004398477,0.0024127106,0.00034286437,0.0035978204,0.00087544654,0.7436516,0.055244718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020093864,0.00032892142,0.037905067,0.0000696514,0.000058925234,0.0017439598,0.0004645783,0.00002717055,0.00017415055,0.00023467935,0.9568436,0.00013988519],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018456933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000488251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21319197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003965047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003060747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95878965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205995618","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2948","title":"Reasoned opinion on the setting of new MRLs for penthiopyrad in various crops","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Agricultural safety and regulations","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"European commission; Agricultural science; Sunflower; Biotechnology; Risk assessment; Business; Crop; Pesticide residue; European union; Toxicology; Pesticide; Biology; Agronomy; Computer science; International trade","score_opus":0.03675865429234651,"score_gpt":0.25299889241322615,"score_spread":0.21624023812087964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205995618","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9751152,0.000410754,0.000039476243,0.023359824,0.00035948286,0.00019565076,0.000008044665,0.000007779957,0.0005038096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980777,0.00007040481,0.0002556843,0.00012796729,0.001177957,0.0000028957877,0.000010444023,4.308796e-7,0.00027653683],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936336,0.00006115139,0.00018760966,0.000059469523,0.00012903946,0.00019937371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994417,0.00028441483,0.00013979194,0.000021197468,0.000034420915,0.000078505516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004230077,0.00006524699,0.00009167648,0.000006087773,0.00028074463,0.000024802404,0.000133486,0.00005277992,0.00023875797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008558208,0.00001591645,0.000088873036,0.00015701407,0.000016588727,0.0001158054,0.00001874226,0.00013976883,0.0000064386572],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045474918,0.0007840755,0.16775337,0.000020219511,0.000100353085,0.0000019925117,0.0064631025,0.00047038958,0.19634503,0.03660738,0.094861,0.49613833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014275665,0.00010064423,0.9586886,0.000053664568,0.0000040307773,0.000034192784,0.00047181713,0.000023030074,0.00077147834,0.0012700179,0.038371187,0.00006854175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009375429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012719489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7909353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002122589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006799867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26142323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206027540","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7092","title":"Pest categorisation of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense Tropical Race 4","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Banana Cultivation and Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alpha Technologies (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. cubense; Biology; Fusarium oxysporum; Quarantine; Fusarium wilt; Pathogen; Host (biology); PEST analysis; Fungus; Veterinary medicine; Botany; Ecology; Microbiology","score_opus":0.027164482323745295,"score_gpt":0.245306916138784,"score_spread":0.2181424338150387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206027540","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98898506,0.00009601188,0.000014129381,0.009870844,0.00024247597,0.000062443694,0.000010371823,0.000010120184,0.0007085264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980842,0.000032716234,0.000031192096,0.00011094532,0.00030870753,0.0000032781234,0.000025327003,5.5663156e-7,0.0014030844],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888116,0.00017831734,0.00020558185,0.00009879129,0.00043350708,0.0002026176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996472,0.000055465443,0.00008369199,0.000027875276,0.00009301815,0.000092719245],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038730717,0.00005646268,0.00010079307,0.000019999798,0.00053581677,0.00003498728,0.0001938637,0.000030922693,0.005639083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040781375,0.000018675912,0.00008035197,0.00021248963,0.000039175036,0.00007155962,0.000082617225,0.00036653687,0.000018133453],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015447747,0.00032561916,0.05469345,0.0000049214473,0.000025097403,0.000035986806,0.0005192516,0.00014011827,0.86552817,0.001421223,0.012289046,0.064862646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031417623,0.00044891727,0.80938774,0.0000027261142,0.000006199904,0.00016344021,0.0017114423,0.000183432,0.008215466,0.00055782305,0.1788984,0.00011021917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000087198685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003361917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8573127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004479616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018676277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9952699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206283985","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7014","title":"Commodity risk assessment of specified species of Lonicera potted plants from Turkey","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Research on scale insects","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alpha Technologies (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"PEST analysis; Quarantine; Risk assessment; European commission; Expert opinion; Business; European union; Biology; Toxicology; Ecology; Horticulture; Computer science; International trade; Medicine","score_opus":0.05231838608251389,"score_gpt":0.2835627248815849,"score_spread":0.23124433879907103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206283985","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945121,0.0001619947,0.000008160561,0.0006901861,0.00025155014,0.000094875,0.00093391736,0.000008562107,0.0033386692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989789,0.00023748005,0.00019690054,0.000034738066,0.0003113369,0.0000026915689,0.000048406204,8.1122715e-7,0.00018871867],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976909,0.0005944292,0.00038745353,0.0001485283,0.0009461081,0.00023259153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870074,0.0005594334,0.0004295966,0.00007801195,0.00010588704,0.00012635929],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091842015,0.00009285914,0.00025821323,0.000025949428,0.0003495164,0.00005041186,0.00056577846,0.000034377867,0.014152355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008773058,0.00003739938,0.00014165472,0.00021716749,0.00008414329,0.00010398902,0.00024390798,0.0006731753,0.0000044674407],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045681663,0.00075538416,0.23352505,0.0000057282004,0.00019825246,0.00011336163,0.00039895336,0.00048668726,0.71677506,0.00019875768,0.026658129,0.02042783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032758314,0.00044716205,0.97571236,0.000011308232,0.000007700523,0.000026352669,0.0006524803,0.00023149031,0.0063993665,0.0012432664,0.014856199,0.000084749154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00087498967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002094319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74218726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000887329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039651237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9867488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206799551","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2022.6930","title":"Pest categorisation of Apium virus Y","year":2022,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Plant Virus Research Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alpha Technologies (Canada)","funders":"Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche; European Food Safety Authority","keywords":"Phytosanitary certification; Biology; European union; Quarantine; Weed; Myzus persicae; PEST analysis; Potyvirus; Plant virus; Horticulture; Aphid; Botany; Virus; Virology; Ecology","score_opus":0.042373561422333374,"score_gpt":0.2775157785353034,"score_spread":0.23514221711297004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206799551","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9908153,0.0032028276,0.0000021692078,0.0030727193,0.0005434514,0.00011038202,0.00064706727,0.00001023904,0.0015958543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995701,0.0025635958,0.000014523341,0.000082369406,0.0007665922,0.0000068722866,0.000025952386,0.0000011555015,0.0008379017],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797684,0.00039356816,0.00033060007,0.00015491027,0.0008012439,0.00034284053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999194,0.00023460599,0.0002897742,0.00004076763,0.00011837723,0.00012244856],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009067539,0.00012047259,0.00022095234,0.00004539378,0.0011839069,0.00011365966,0.000420754,0.000036572696,0.004691749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001393664,0.00005184152,0.00013978801,0.00037151025,0.000112129375,0.0001267793,0.0003374893,0.00059586664,0.000041384556],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015419551,0.00028851817,0.011170041,0.000018673481,0.00010481507,0.00008335908,0.0005190963,0.00009301673,0.91780436,0.00042794892,0.045730047,0.023605943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047760954,0.0020917687,0.44448736,0.00004176156,0.0000536919,0.00051336404,0.0043303524,0.00015854326,0.017890813,0.0017491432,0.52783567,0.00036993678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005233524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000065831875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89991355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010552573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049453552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210306525","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7091","title":"Pest categorisation of Bagrada hilaris","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Hemiptera Insect Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alpha Technologies (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"PEST analysis; Pentatomidae; Biology; Mediterranean climate; Hemiptera; Geography; Agroforestry; Ecology; Botany","score_opus":0.023686557772456613,"score_gpt":0.22321039368687787,"score_spread":0.19952383591442124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210306525","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9481989,0.012353948,0.000009391989,0.033120032,0.003344062,0.000081688944,0.000063645035,0.00000950158,0.0028188117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990704,0.00064150576,0.0000921045,0.0003075414,0.0012894825,0.0000050238755,0.0000089728255,0.0000012615793,0.0069501246],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985037,0.000273521,0.0003692707,0.00013779485,0.0004319356,0.00028379363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932027,0.0001418655,0.0002930618,0.000037444734,0.00010752125,0.00009985629],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006581929,0.00011716433,0.000201259,0.000021778147,0.0009833553,0.000049473685,0.00026367622,0.000047487938,0.016084725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008117236,0.000056151246,0.00015461177,0.00034112166,0.00010249422,0.00013639241,0.0001963741,0.00051901105,0.000029022443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000107499414,0.0009284607,0.20274155,0.000056370714,0.00026225598,0.00020965812,0.006629952,0.00039342183,0.094917774,0.005429946,0.22712559,0.46119753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026330835,0.0011046918,0.20887153,0.00002781332,0.00005286467,0.0007435988,0.0041794353,0.00008266957,0.0015823353,0.0037128043,0.7791481,0.0002308783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008680727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014225121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5520225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015776827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003651396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9848147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210354774","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7076","title":"Assessment of animal diseases caused by bacteria resistant to antimicrobials: kept fish species","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Aquaculture disease management and microbiota","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alpha Technologies (Canada)","funders":"European Food Safety Authority","keywords":"Antimicrobial; Biology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Bacteria; Microbiology; Food science; Fishery","score_opus":0.010919579231134478,"score_gpt":0.25197058493503033,"score_spread":0.24105100570389584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210354774","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910827,0.0009930014,0.000102317084,0.0018080965,0.0010441428,0.00031613524,0.0030769098,0.00004060846,0.0015360493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98877484,0.00006453516,0.000105594554,0.00087465526,0.0000803422,0.000013735908,0.0006185338,0.00002316679,0.009444606],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998431,0.00035046742,0.00046345193,0.00026785771,0.000093044844,0.0003941372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992894,0.000041096624,0.00028866236,0.00022765828,0.00008070995,0.00007250807],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003033151,0.00020678352,0.00036436095,0.00016202149,0.0006056615,0.00006453417,0.00045231456,0.00005384642,0.015698325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033899345,0.0001865901,0.00020086255,0.00020361714,0.00009871111,0.00009774834,0.00038610527,0.00036185974,0.00002929354],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023582202,0.000220003,0.0011814655,0.000011186216,0.00019051165,0.00002128486,0.00012563195,0.000004182346,0.57666487,0.00014827651,0.4211215,0.00007524657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015615497,0.00069932675,0.1442692,0.000032928445,0.00020006011,0.000057097666,0.0011224034,4.737384e-7,0.037528723,0.000013902074,0.8142201,0.00029424205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011658672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007125861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5391362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014681033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011704738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9852015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210390556","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7025","title":"Proposal of a ranking methodology for plant threats in the EU","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Insect-Plant Interactions and Control","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alpha Technologies (Canada)","funders":"Directorate-General for Health and Consumers; Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l’Alimentation, de l’Environnement et du Travail; European Food Safety Authority","keywords":"European commission; Ranking (information retrieval); Risk assessment; Risk analysis (engineering); Biotechnology; Agricultural science; Business; Computer science; European union; Environmental science; Biology; Information retrieval; Computer security","score_opus":0.07784762654065172,"score_gpt":0.29520995826258406,"score_spread":0.21736233172193234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210390556","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932542,0.00020108183,0.00007493827,0.005358256,0.00040133242,0.00017006109,0.00005733203,0.000003430921,0.00047938165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99891007,0.000012360602,0.00027753814,0.0003985989,0.000291159,0.000031057134,0.00000964282,2.7789872e-7,0.000069316826],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992045,0.00035002406,0.00015283268,0.00005891295,0.00011053044,0.00012317664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991987,0.0006538122,0.00009792202,0.000016289925,0.000021439191,0.000011862949],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012017457,0.000040004186,0.00009637527,0.0000135886985,0.00030530491,0.000020821322,0.00018648684,0.000015426738,0.00049107976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003473556,0.000011417762,0.00007594121,0.00008739091,0.000010784227,0.000032479948,0.000019151763,0.00020960676,5.8755995e-7],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019243796,0.00045633328,0.004490479,0.000008797719,0.000084029285,0.00011053456,0.0035311943,0.00018846025,0.69889,0.027401125,0.007080101,0.2558346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004387996,0.009026813,0.11153008,0.000099003,0.00014492091,0.020256016,0.031086147,0.0021160308,0.012208895,0.12840421,0.6800188,0.00072106975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008225625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022669414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6866811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000137716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013176676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5376979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210658958","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7104","title":"SCAN‐Clim: a tool to support pest climate suitability analysis based on climate classification","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Insect-Plant Interactions and Control","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alpha Technologies (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"PEST analysis; Risk assessment; Climate change; Climate change scenario; Documentation; Integrated pest management; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Business; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.02141783956809984,"score_gpt":0.25236565430233254,"score_spread":0.2309478147342327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210658958","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934271,0.000006107964,0.000029649927,0.0030529227,0.0003392241,0.00015939657,0.0004649059,0.000034772776,0.0024858953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997878,0.000011207568,0.000052959593,0.0014504436,0.00026031915,0.000053767973,0.00016595346,0.0000011597398,0.00012614825],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832225,0.00018903324,0.00038017257,0.00027483635,0.00042252822,0.00041120555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927187,0.00019194344,0.00019348152,0.00009728515,0.0001033971,0.00014200494],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011915097,0.00012868979,0.00021078227,0.00008479074,0.0012924465,0.00018878147,0.0002792034,0.00003449102,0.015842251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053493815,0.00005621018,0.00029832244,0.00077885564,0.000013606956,0.00011034941,0.00006157047,0.00036562706,0.00011102326],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029044591,0.0020496729,0.5345858,0.000014311071,0.00034751717,0.00014618697,0.0003272642,0.007853399,0.20144346,0.0015488443,0.010810301,0.23796882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032851516,0.0016476666,0.9217006,0.0000076373935,0.00018340326,0.000098970595,0.00071056595,0.009525848,0.00020941137,0.00006524004,0.06522662,0.0002955015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007854392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004435172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38711485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001888905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027271928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99405843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210873018","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7080","title":"Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial‐resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius in dogs and cats","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alpha Technologies (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Staphylococcus pseudintermedius; Listing (finance); Antimicrobial; Animal health; CATS; Veterinary medicine; Companion animal; Biology; Law; Medicine; Staphylococcus; Staphylococcus aureus; Political science; Microbiology; Business; Internal medicine; Genetics; Bacteria","score_opus":0.01015252511914387,"score_gpt":0.2847626231539151,"score_spread":0.2746100980347712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210873018","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.998147,0.00084312656,0.000089710484,0.00046016052,0.00012428535,0.00018569405,0.00009425754,8.158884e-7,0.000054951866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99940336,0.00016876521,0.0002313958,0.000060787846,0.00010442917,0.0000039761135,0.000010351371,0.000008242005,0.000008695779],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988094,0.00028774983,0.00039435536,0.00013560607,0.00022972867,0.0001431651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919873,0.000046222056,0.00044587397,0.00014212982,0.00011496375,0.000052055384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080175535,0.00008294676,0.00017411003,0.000037204172,0.00022810904,0.000022357,0.00014393435,0.000042192252,0.000020639325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009908431,0.00005499265,0.00004900253,0.00009698376,0.00021948034,0.0000075553817,0.0001897235,0.00022968763,2.6017526e-8],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059510424,0.00008155213,0.026537515,0.00008589384,0.00002799868,9.440712e-7,0.00036431252,0.00007476248,0.9703992,0.0012835426,0.00017394287,0.00037520114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000910237,0.0016068341,0.9627629,0.00015488842,0.000022267543,0.000027034866,0.00040984753,0.0005561774,0.032527227,0.00040432412,0.0005028866,0.00011536964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037137102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000103492544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.937872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035741574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002730636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22425352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212828918","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7127","title":"Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial‐resistant Enterococcus faecalis in poultry","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alpha Technologies (Canada)","funders":"European Food Safety Authority","keywords":"Enterococcus faecalis; Antimicrobial; Animal health; Listing (finance); Enterococcus; Veterinary medicine; Biology; Biotechnology; Law; Microbiology; Business; Medicine; Political science; Staphylococcus aureus; Antibiotics; Bacteria","score_opus":0.01719697571989672,"score_gpt":0.2699640033741282,"score_spread":0.2527670276542315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212828918","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966155,0.00031907394,0.0000095236,0.0026107233,0.00014614155,0.0001400836,0.000097787735,0.000003299475,0.00005783532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993976,0.00003627676,0.00012144153,0.00030797586,0.00011440732,0.0000030431956,0.000012740391,0.0000010045048,0.0000055432856],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982324,0.0007325166,0.0005685855,0.00012623628,0.0001909539,0.00014930622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986343,0.0003750984,0.00082761835,0.000054775246,0.00006564565,0.00004259341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010031282,0.00008459183,0.00024072504,0.00001372483,0.00030977404,0.000015808007,0.00021093764,0.00004078444,0.00009331126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011056109,0.000029640347,0.000083503444,0.00019114732,0.00013010601,0.00006163155,0.00011696447,0.00028008426,9.356215e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025087135,0.00014497401,0.56445444,0.000025362517,0.000018636969,0.0000010667707,0.0004188191,0.00016412558,0.42882955,0.0047473297,0.00030274832,0.00064208667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013795064,0.00054675504,0.99624777,0.00007013841,0.000012206914,0.000021851327,0.0010589436,0.00019298535,0.00051331904,0.00090919744,0.00023766157,0.000051234365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000961494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011913208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43179333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005480752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046924728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23825628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214725805","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7126","title":"Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial‐resistant Enterococcus cecorum in poultry","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alpha Technologies (Canada)","funders":"Veterinärmedizinische Universität Wien; European Food Safety Authority","keywords":"Listing (finance); European union; Health claims on food labels; Enterococcus; Antimicrobial; Control (management); Animal health; Medicine; Veterinary medicine; Biology; Business; Computer science; Bacteria; Food science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.015943649609412042,"score_gpt":0.2654760739896415,"score_spread":0.24953242438022946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214725805","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962442,0.00031243352,0.00000691848,0.0029699677,0.00017643064,0.00014016515,0.000077027515,0.0000032414157,0.00006959977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99940556,0.00003740349,0.00012030623,0.0003009654,0.0001145085,0.000002926922,0.000010735167,0.0000010070034,0.000006557867],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829936,0.0006787997,0.000560184,0.0001253259,0.00017724861,0.00015909535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863267,0.00035334565,0.0008580442,0.000054088774,0.000060421975,0.000041459727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009900469,0.000083778905,0.00023519991,0.0000139242975,0.00032471595,0.000015058821,0.00020792571,0.000039134407,0.0000918831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000097359836,0.000029593773,0.00008079314,0.000180003,0.00011929965,0.00006167238,0.00012270165,0.00028474774,1.1156169e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022569961,0.00012698497,0.64278984,0.00002127022,0.000015072378,8.818894e-7,0.00025500203,0.00010684005,0.3510743,0.0046199868,0.00027343063,0.00049071095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013507779,0.0006011638,0.99596256,0.0000702462,0.000011024763,0.000022576558,0.0013188422,0.00020152307,0.00044671362,0.00095182634,0.00022798289,0.0000504396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006962231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013553581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35317275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006771336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004974837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24974854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220919902","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7124","title":"Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial‐resistant Brachyspira hyodysenteriae in swine","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Veterinary medicine and infectious diseases","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alpha Technologies (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Listing (finance); Antimicrobial; Animal health; Health claims on food labels; Biology; Law; Political science; Medicine; Microbiology; Business; Veterinary medicine; Food science","score_opus":0.028406866955440632,"score_gpt":0.3307881633132168,"score_spread":0.30238129635777616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220919902","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975378,0.00049781793,0.000104010884,0.0009018345,0.0003406882,0.00028165322,0.00010781576,0.000008604878,0.00021977088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99916875,0.000035223813,0.00026858653,0.00027384225,0.00020839466,0.000007898606,0.000012483686,0.000017790473,0.0000070083565],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774957,0.0006760733,0.00082606217,0.00016006896,0.00040832834,0.00017990128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830306,0.00016177213,0.0011297753,0.00022758474,0.000110409186,0.00006742368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008649726,0.00014129776,0.0003373773,0.000100493104,0.0003997055,0.00002360196,0.00019617035,0.00003205731,0.00023241022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014096552,0.00009480641,0.00010951571,0.00024282816,0.0001799163,0.00017957488,0.00020114942,0.00037778734,2.6367292e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006482836,0.002016346,0.22028735,0.0010822768,0.00023876688,0.00008701709,0.0046758843,0.0014669657,0.7512266,0.00903196,0.0026643402,0.00073966215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096254505,0.006474347,0.98782504,0.0004917937,0.000070038244,0.00045076155,0.000993362,0.0015837619,0.00033759515,0.00046146772,0.00023164961,0.00011764665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007550339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023123752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76753765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012819907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029075972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38660932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221134748","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7144","title":"Pest categorisation of Zaprionus indianus","year":2022,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Insect behavior and control techniques","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alpha Technologies (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"PEST analysis; Phytosanitary certification; European union; Quarantine; Drosophila suzukii; Biology; European commission; Horticulture; Drosophilidae; Toxicology; Botany; Ecology; International trade; Drosophila melanogaster","score_opus":0.015965192292148794,"score_gpt":0.22273427299203,"score_spread":0.2067690806998812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221134748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9923472,0.0030963824,0.0000073578844,0.0010871356,0.0023610964,0.00015657285,0.00006834505,0.000026445621,0.00084947207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971847,0.00037088423,0.00003166951,0.00015738585,0.0015782426,0.00001269998,0.000027583446,0.000001856576,0.0006349846],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831873,0.00030659552,0.00042892896,0.00015747554,0.00050575996,0.00028251362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992304,0.00006017136,0.00042989696,0.000057392972,0.000113331145,0.00010880181],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074077863,0.00013642466,0.00022424334,0.00004977251,0.0008806079,0.00008551918,0.0003997671,0.000079132384,0.0081083635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027705875,0.00006617471,0.00021795432,0.00031160205,0.000060144266,0.000110531204,0.00011954828,0.00067830476,0.00002928571],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039655683,0.0011492142,0.04872995,0.000019064151,0.00013376438,0.00036756555,0.0032387362,0.00002816429,0.37572595,0.0027149995,0.03555202,0.53194404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009661329,0.004969332,0.674168,0.000043062908,0.00029469296,0.00085866253,0.002923089,0.000119223114,0.006121597,0.005089776,0.30378062,0.0006657866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043047642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025137699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6254381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012474362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057757097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9927984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225472163","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7207","title":"Pest categorisation of Sirex nitobei","year":2022,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Forest Insect Ecology and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alpha Technologies (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"PEST analysis; Phytosanitary certification; Biology; Host (biology); Fungus; Pinus thunbergii; Botany; Ecology; Horticulture","score_opus":0.008417818455446261,"score_gpt":0.20979754796888406,"score_spread":0.2013797295134378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225472163","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9825599,0.0014974201,0.0003508668,0.0009572745,0.0059608934,0.00021821553,0.000017464617,0.000011201977,0.008426772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964083,0.00030619165,0.00014688808,0.0002956749,0.00030829286,0.000009322157,0.000007775437,0.000010985559,0.0025065592],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845886,0.00025240774,0.00036491192,0.00016376245,0.0004761202,0.0002839517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993203,0.000044580876,0.00036055176,0.00016553936,0.0000098086675,0.000099198216],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091360364,0.000113791466,0.00014984938,0.00008978214,0.000797699,0.000026249609,0.0003762967,0.00004346803,0.04186639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000316965,0.00011738683,0.00010096294,0.00023720614,0.00016015209,0.00015006519,0.00038954656,0.0005519711,0.0006864162],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055662147,0.0030118397,0.3160571,0.00011077118,0.0007851928,0.0009350251,0.014246046,0.11650362,0.0196713,0.010894735,0.45202097,0.0652068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011479288,0.0013062307,0.57727593,0.000012351872,0.00021161667,0.00028707625,0.0023660918,0.001788122,0.00055200217,0.008359316,0.4063738,0.000319547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020447103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000053742126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26121882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004208156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045179666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95900947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242287536","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3456","title":"Reasoned opinion on the import tolerance for glyphosate in genetically modified oilseed rape","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Glyphosate; Genetically modified organism; Residue (chemistry); Biotechnology; Herbicide resistance; Enforcement; Risk assessment; Pesticide residue; Biology; Pesticide; Toxicology; Agronomy; Gene; Weed control; Genetics; Biochemistry; Economics","score_opus":0.039443722324793734,"score_gpt":0.25300548249612204,"score_spread":0.2135617601713283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242287536","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97965944,0.00015400462,0.000074466996,0.018458389,0.00018949245,0.00058580335,0.000005930027,0.000015785243,0.00085671805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99774474,0.00015090362,0.0005322332,0.00075272383,0.00048092703,0.000075977405,0.000005742663,0.0000025372992,0.0002542341],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982912,0.00015892652,0.00034434392,0.0002518147,0.0004193986,0.0005343508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900717,0.00044610136,0.000084584295,0.00009277807,0.00015891509,0.00021048324],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074834,0.00014841363,0.00017005646,0.000021496107,0.00029274728,0.00024789385,0.0005281262,0.0001073304,0.0012715966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025819367,0.000047544716,0.00010771278,0.00023195305,0.00007379647,0.000075154894,0.000064736385,0.00038586406,0.00011041572],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021293401,0.00016831515,0.0012703628,0.0000042672414,0.000015386155,0.0000066908374,0.000082058315,0.00021406403,0.8647047,0.0013503317,0.003931521,0.12803932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011137025,0.0013318533,0.94297224,0.00007015578,0.0000044387552,0.000077600154,0.00019867255,0.0064235954,0.02444366,0.012868567,0.010117067,0.00037842797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013509138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000055570934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9417019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037233753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034617908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246420238","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3743","title":"Reasoned opinion on the setting of MRLs for imazapyr in genetically modified soya bean and other oilseeds and in lentils","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Agricultural safety and regulations","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sunflower; Imazapyr; Soya bean; Toxicology; Biotechnology; Biology; Agronomy; Food science; Glyphosate","score_opus":0.02089633924631883,"score_gpt":0.22974001857524945,"score_spread":0.2088436793289306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246420238","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916965,0.00013581017,0.000026201338,0.0076935627,0.00003730289,0.00012634939,0.0000054329216,0.000002687774,0.0002762041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99944204,0.00007612034,0.00014406272,0.00013249699,0.0001597621,0.0000024172773,0.00000245108,4.786741e-7,0.00004016329],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944633,0.000082946324,0.00017854544,0.000087759705,0.000079851714,0.00012454894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955606,0.00028488188,0.00007955313,0.00001701395,0.000022382827,0.000040093833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047911497,0.000060429356,0.00009842084,0.000009711605,0.00014127945,0.000030285575,0.000066551474,0.000050061764,0.000021383701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000623987,0.000016971444,0.000030872117,0.00008742514,0.000042918175,0.00004090961,0.000018646964,0.000095824915,2.9197238e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057047507,0.0003095996,0.16723894,0.000037172787,0.00004114181,0.0000013238488,0.0019653346,0.0011933516,0.3768654,0.020640394,0.0009927629,0.4301441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027698386,0.00015493376,0.99247086,0.000081355705,0.0000025583797,0.000013197978,0.00025524106,0.0015628425,0.0005898422,0.0029217645,0.0016036788,0.000066768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035761463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026348446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8252319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000070198103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000022456006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10866216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250759543","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4451","title":"Modification of the existing maximum residue levels for metconazole in various crops","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Agricultural safety and regulations","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sunflower; European commission; Agricultural science; Crop; Toxicology; European union; Business; Biotechnology; Environmental science; Horticulture; Biology; Agronomy","score_opus":0.06959117041255816,"score_gpt":0.2652473499606553,"score_spread":0.19565617954809714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250759543","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9863014,0.00008563834,0.0005158216,0.012390366,0.00013481324,0.00014999803,0.000034280132,0.0000066265457,0.0003810558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99857634,0.000012696822,0.0003566994,0.000033373046,0.00023031863,0.0000047754393,0.000002012041,3.7059903e-7,0.0007834123],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993895,0.000058895082,0.00022531897,0.000080831844,0.00011254164,0.00013287737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948025,0.00020693988,0.00016655133,0.000027578646,0.000086819295,0.000031850017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027415124,0.000054385615,0.00008127569,0.000005934566,0.00025869333,0.000016584941,0.00017968156,0.000050088704,0.00011580772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000103963175,0.000011180555,0.00008470278,0.00015246877,0.00004094422,0.000100309,0.000024513281,0.00006656631,0.0000023198618],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033610017,0.00005329071,0.011315898,0.00000363931,0.000011447913,6.7324027e-7,0.00016490105,0.00007946491,0.7890838,0.004459676,0.00068618514,0.19410746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018223241,0.000035961602,0.9684736,0.000051585048,0.000005560373,0.00002545952,0.00010676243,0.00002004993,0.009508709,0.015347577,0.00618445,0.000058014182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000056436296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004516713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95715773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030628373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008879389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1989686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250867632","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6799","title":"Commodity risk assessment of Citrus L. fruits from South Africa for Thaumatotibia leucotreta under a systems approach","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Insect behavior and control techniques","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alpha Technologies (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Tortricidae; European union; Business; Agricultural science; PEST analysis; Biology; Marketing; International trade","score_opus":0.05242342987386776,"score_gpt":0.26300435444543624,"score_spread":0.21058092457156846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250867632","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9918454,0.0007181875,0.0041643744,0.00013592595,0.00026146683,0.00024352204,0.00064689585,0.000044562308,0.0019396105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99806386,0.000040122603,0.0012702199,0.000027831327,0.0003127379,0.000023981795,0.000063544394,0.0000016994233,0.00019602719],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986429,0.0002501732,0.0003502035,0.00020684833,0.00030082287,0.00024901994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906313,0.00018154067,0.0003268438,0.00008374053,0.00024302813,0.00010173609],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004614414,0.00013829222,0.00033471297,0.000012090125,0.0003026335,0.00017365633,0.00025288027,0.00012109313,0.00022417055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031827734,0.000055093155,0.0002483574,0.00013068624,0.000034766024,0.00009355973,0.000053548003,0.00030953067,0.0000012154081],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023821108,0.0020208831,0.26802632,0.00007410759,0.0006401009,0.00006179892,0.0022242095,0.00015840065,0.6532126,0.008329304,0.011549536,0.0534645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017215312,0.00083745096,0.9599746,0.0001781831,0.00043294486,0.00016518499,0.004551183,0.005787563,0.008223126,0.0073818685,0.010032205,0.000714185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020976638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003958561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69194824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045160305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039769257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24545103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252524490","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1959","title":"Setting of an MRL for ethametsulfuron‐methyl in rape seed","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Agricultural safety and regulations","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Food Safety Authority","keywords":"European commission; Food safety; Directive; Commission; Political science; European union; Library science; Business; Agricultural science; Law; Computer science; Biology; Food science; International trade","score_opus":0.009396530571223556,"score_gpt":0.2332911280765948,"score_spread":0.22389459750537125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252524490","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99627084,0.000038366492,0.000017749999,0.0030984355,0.00023654973,0.00011878382,0.000013883256,0.0000102829545,0.00019508367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996754,0.000009403996,0.002467283,0.000054168137,0.00055767945,0.000003456107,0.000021295042,4.950706e-7,0.0001322138],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930304,0.00005459983,0.00024122944,0.00010305635,0.000118296135,0.00017980488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994587,0.00019867964,0.00014485544,0.000024524797,0.00008676379,0.0000865189],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005076652,0.000072242954,0.00012458053,0.000012009593,0.00020483312,0.000029523957,0.0001724427,0.000097320684,0.00024071783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008671121,0.000022250844,0.000093971525,0.0002149725,0.00003480251,0.0001898224,0.000018405586,0.00028250975,0.0000019486677],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027352473,0.0000641297,0.008843529,0.0000023848138,0.0000056243807,0.0000011229646,0.00020507221,0.00005776744,0.9000173,0.00025195465,0.00008456047,0.0904392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000217278,0.00016697109,0.9831108,0.000013366804,0.000006305199,0.00005813621,0.0004888763,0.00022200578,0.0072326832,0.0017142681,0.006672695,0.00009661565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004355856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016159512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97426724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000075765943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007933494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26356915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254263884","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2771","title":"Reasoned opinion on the modification of the existing MRLs for ametoctradin in various commodities","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Agricultural safety and regulations","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"European commission; Agricultural science; Toxicology; Horticulture; Business; European union; Biology","score_opus":0.11001844390085566,"score_gpt":0.27651803909204,"score_spread":0.16649959519118432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254263884","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98635036,0.00019726536,0.000046981575,0.012030817,0.00030421102,0.00024918103,0.000016318341,0.0000060761545,0.0007987745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991522,0.000032768843,0.00008316266,0.00008356353,0.00051707256,0.000011019653,0.000009084341,3.5866788e-7,0.00011078952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939543,0.000117274016,0.00017351455,0.000048044076,0.00012359377,0.00014212253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992811,0.00045397927,0.00016407548,0.000031261203,0.00003972162,0.000029872454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047515184,0.000055350552,0.00007128424,0.0000047914646,0.00045176904,0.00002273737,0.00017766519,0.00004135346,0.000043462427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010082322,0.000012036752,0.00008136633,0.00015043179,0.000046359455,0.000093215756,0.000015631771,0.00013487776,0.000001276264],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030242634,0.0009481904,0.06635723,0.000026297916,0.00008630451,3.5954673e-7,0.0068291356,0.0017812457,0.22698879,0.4569135,0.018660609,0.22110592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008995242,0.00006344532,0.9785443,0.000056838624,0.000004364113,0.000017256785,0.00084595627,0.00017826786,0.0013881087,0.003903453,0.014848205,0.000059855607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004635192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005801908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91218704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029094608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000039921697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3474688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W428419734","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3771","title":"Scientific Opinion on the pest categorisation of Strawberry latent C virus","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Phytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"PEST analysis; Biology; Botany","score_opus":0.03283801700296585,"score_gpt":0.221279318999611,"score_spread":0.18844130199664516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W428419734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965936,0.000046505706,0.000007190768,0.0013478684,0.00062436465,0.000042170974,0.000008693636,0.0000060608186,0.0013235711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992295,0.000034771467,0.000014538912,0.00007960553,0.0005244453,0.000001081121,0.0000073057363,3.7543688e-7,0.00010837131],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999349,0.000068417554,0.00015057753,0.00009424284,0.00021110842,0.00012666038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962485,0.00009625055,0.000121122226,0.000038617512,0.000065822634,0.000053315176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057004305,0.000058364945,0.00007170992,0.000009402316,0.00036893273,0.000115569375,0.0001574336,0.000031235493,0.00036835144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038361486,0.00001622812,0.00006790654,0.00010463343,0.000049652317,0.00006440034,0.000016629057,0.00013112798,0.000033150012],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027925798,0.00013022091,0.021625094,0.0000032127684,0.000010730943,0.0000012333741,0.00024210781,0.000049732123,0.8781299,0.0054518506,0.005616578,0.08871141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017006247,0.0005248548,0.8128286,0.00005396932,0.0000072253065,0.000050747116,0.00013576275,0.00045253054,0.050148126,0.0058247647,0.1296458,0.0001575413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000965777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000067437984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82798177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001217779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006332342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.403319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4290973805","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7415","title":"Avian influenza overview March – June 2022","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Influenza Virus Research Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Influenza A virus subtype H5N1; Biology; Virology; Virus","score_opus":0.1295490434283183,"score_gpt":0.4210819598575898,"score_spread":0.2915329164292715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4290973805","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7701023,0.14614074,0.00008058784,0.035073396,0.0038513807,0.0016124941,0.00015600226,0.00021297326,0.04277013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6917984,0.026352366,0.005701339,0.101991385,0.011159686,0.00091889023,0.00008186154,0.0005905531,0.16140553],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969441,0.00029923828,0.0004312175,0.00021248762,0.0014973317,0.0006155863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989112,0.00009991402,0.00013190958,0.00031870764,0.00020897957,0.00032928042],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016030886,0.00016778141,0.00036339997,0.0003415384,0.0011458226,0.000056604567,0.00029389135,0.00003499009,0.018266387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003979386,0.000143781,0.00021361653,0.00054312625,0.00009960175,0.00012633072,0.00058514933,0.0019127886,0.00024217696],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025987027,0.0009570621,0.13924186,0.00042049558,0.00135833,0.005685512,0.0030886084,0.00025418287,0.012064775,0.0017103471,0.7624766,0.0701435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022186446,0.00047954664,0.048624642,0.00005683465,0.000052343934,0.0020619256,0.00045798637,0.000034633093,0.00014641667,0.00044559225,0.94527227,0.00014919654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002778685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000751712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18279561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004980003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003978841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.982631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297896152","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2022.e200923","title":"Editorial: Relevance of dog studies for the derivation of health‐based guidance values for plant protection products approval","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"European union; Hazard; Risk assessment; Hazard analysis; Risk analysis (engineering); Business; Population; Relevance (law); Observational study; Food safety; Animal testing; Biotechnology; Toxicology; Environmental health; Biology; Medicine; Computer science; Engineering; Ecology; Computer security; Pathology","score_opus":0.20999031437831675,"score_gpt":0.4354132215072312,"score_spread":0.22542290712891447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297896152","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00063065573,0.007089035,0.008483417,0.00061371556,0.9808378,0.0017012012,0.00060282584,0.00003692329,0.000004408817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016934497,0.0004835591,0.0067681517,0.000008614969,0.99024385,0.0004871246,0.000082658946,0.00005869625,0.0001738798],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970905,0.0003475774,0.0010087371,0.00034756077,0.0009303447,0.00027528327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913093,0.003731576,0.0030302247,0.00024853108,0.0016511721,0.000029181827],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003510381,0.0002542783,0.0006329231,0.000111729365,0.000709818,0.00003307475,0.00040239477,0.0001388671,0.0000040089167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01853035,0.00018176397,0.00020643168,0.0001485186,0.00012711724,0.00011626188,0.00006877487,0.00077051873,1.8379235e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023054434,0.000076324126,0.0000049385762,0.0021162173,0.00023994884,9.015112e-7,0.00065457344,0.00024880117,0.0018280756,0.00001677056,0.9894271,0.0030808942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011321515,0.0066650324,0.000025037509,0.0010607194,0.00008388559,0.000013465468,0.00044586495,0.0006039344,0.0008586706,0.0011046367,0.987818,0.00018862322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000056217945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000018373856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01501997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024537803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008730094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.989737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401124985","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8892","title":"Commodity risk assessment of maple veneer sheets from Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Plant Pathogens and Resistance","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Food Inspection Agency","keywords":"Veneer; European union; Quarantine; Xylella fastidiosa; Materials science; Environmental science; Pulp and paper industry; Composite material; Horticulture; Business; Biology; Ecology; Engineering","score_opus":0.010837421928675916,"score_gpt":0.2139173886054821,"score_spread":0.20307996667680617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401124985","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948535,0.0013915724,0.000016757374,0.00069763314,0.00057944946,0.000022351505,0.0013372146,0.0000076885135,0.0010938119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99905205,0.00022578718,0.00016872473,0.000047038862,0.00036748472,4.9380907e-7,0.000030573672,3.7200715e-7,0.000107457],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936616,0.00005910434,0.00014322471,0.00008929478,0.00022140345,0.00012079714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996696,0.00013998804,0.000060621533,0.000023802128,0.000029382769,0.00007660285],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018098434,0.000058115817,0.00010184443,0.0000040816803,0.00012656474,0.000059076578,0.00013225949,0.000029547808,0.0010806309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011521236,0.000018785504,0.000056636098,0.000078091034,0.0000136915505,0.00004384866,0.000020411953,0.0002025914,0.0000021276055],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022709852,0.00008525905,0.11223327,0.000017657389,0.00015311717,0.00062153087,0.000041331274,0.00014291918,0.68358266,0.00021103428,0.10591381,0.096974716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037097077,0.0000304121,0.86963487,0.00005580152,0.000014405747,0.000027377253,0.00004029205,0.00041827012,0.0009249306,0.0003469331,0.12840219,0.00006742914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09100151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35666597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7574016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050923885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000072669194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409482416","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9387","title":"Modification of the existing maximum residue levels and setting of import tolerances for trifloxystrobin in various crops","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Agricultural safety and regulations","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agriculture; Enforcement; Risk assessment; Agricultural science; Food safety; Toxicology; Business; Environmental science; Biology; Food science; Computer science","score_opus":0.030907117641313247,"score_gpt":0.26596454093346694,"score_spread":0.2350574232921537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409482416","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952449,0.00026991105,0.00015999297,0.0037998739,0.00008035738,0.00015545245,0.000017980823,0.0000030498002,0.00026843333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99920094,0.000014968406,0.0004985175,0.000019040428,0.00006916723,0.0000033880358,0.0000030871347,2.2391531e-7,0.00019066448],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993937,0.000048593713,0.00030856743,0.00007650152,0.000078071724,0.00009454028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995043,0.0001566803,0.00022607521,0.000020486295,0.00007613824,0.00001626574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034911645,0.000050544844,0.00011516019,0.0000102321965,0.0002281215,0.000016407603,0.00011243451,0.000046638645,0.000009720197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007531633,0.000014999707,0.000058157002,0.00024587975,0.00004083915,0.00007953361,0.000024190398,0.00009051811,4.029677e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000104845356,0.00009813213,0.18766557,0.00006795941,0.00003590099,7.099102e-7,0.0008337316,0.0013721584,0.6379754,0.005768972,0.00039421575,0.1656824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015958695,0.00002962029,0.9876185,0.00011265117,0.000008647765,0.000011692391,0.00040617445,0.0002382388,0.0049918843,0.005917079,0.00046871227,0.000037200636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011283862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048643074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7999529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013652407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013445904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17545491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415690571","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9740","title":"Prolonged multi‐country outbreak of Salmonella Strathcona ST2559 linked to consumption of tomatoes in the European Union/European Economic Area – first update, 23 October 2025","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Outbreak; Salmonella; Consumption (sociology); Salmonella Food Poisoning; Economic impact analysis; Food safety; European region; Public health","score_opus":0.03444977674407895,"score_gpt":0.2714176584164769,"score_spread":0.23696788167239796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415690571","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9870272,0.0017942234,0.00005483925,0.0048982757,0.0010113005,0.00058522716,0.00018956099,0.000018526314,0.0044208346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99602354,0.0020654642,0.00010208939,0.0008373969,0.00045728433,0.000005580001,0.000058246555,0.000006956852,0.00044347564],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912571,0.005324395,0.0019616012,0.0005819508,0.00021883947,0.0006561195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974456,0.0008809185,0.0010036565,0.0002897122,0.0001735825,0.00020655134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072604674,0.00045003762,0.00084024004,0.00015695729,0.00036367893,0.00015850407,0.0013507598,0.00021274666,0.000619627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029606494,0.0002058476,0.00032954977,0.0004743738,0.00038322315,0.00019895681,0.00031432082,0.00078540016,0.00017040425],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004641123,0.0010116289,0.9048786,0.00015926581,0.0003436653,0.00016577475,0.0018328497,0.0012517583,0.036952257,0.00062782626,0.013168404,0.03914386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009994614,0.0003903289,0.98110986,0.0004991659,0.00009404323,0.00013998187,0.0011744628,0.00019972655,0.00017281121,0.0002203877,0.014689935,0.00030985996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033079027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026375065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07623124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001045075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000086395325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83942217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}