{"meta":{"query_hash":"bfdae380f3be","filters":{"venue":"ETHICS IN PROGRESS"},"cohort_total":7,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"exported":7,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/bfdae380f3be","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=ETHICS+IN+PROGRESS"},"results":[{"id":"W2257243734","doi":"10.14746/eip.2014.1.2","title":"Antiglobalization and Radical Environmentalism: An Exchange on Ethical Grounds","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ETHICS IN PROGRESS","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Hospital Edmonton; University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Alberta","keywords":"Environmentalism; Globalization; Political radicalism; Ideology; Direct action; Abandonment (legal); Political economy; Politics; Environmental ethics; Political science; Environmental movement; State (computer science); Sociology; Law and economics; Law","score_opus":0.0334918770358803,"score_gpt":0.3115652789350908,"score_spread":0.2780734018992105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257243734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96072024,0.00014362995,0.00069683604,0.021555966,0.00028636892,0.00044229993,0.000009885921,0.00009171395,0.01605306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99057186,0.00025302905,0.0017012464,0.007222925,0.00010679221,0.00003059833,0.000031894157,0.000027148883,0.000054503937],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99730897,0.00069902086,0.00025667838,0.0005911969,0.00080246327,0.00034166017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990822,0.00027710682,0.0000719622,0.00036107298,0.0000021233752,0.00020554604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023769499,0.00021753025,0.00017863198,0.00004160099,0.00026218506,0.000057848618,0.00027006047,0.0009367316,0.00042517728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015921422,0.00020859117,0.000030878236,0.00014544606,0.0020807106,0.0002571587,0.00029164655,0.0021854918,0.00014851446],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027882057,0.0017688498,0.55922395,0.00020004586,0.00002109813,0.00007429098,0.015026945,0.0014397526,0.0012773568,0.3654075,0.0007158345,0.054565564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029043935,0.0020335228,0.6340429,0.00024513126,0.00004015184,0.000065773085,0.00037727688,0.011069982,0.0016485713,0.2819219,0.06416388,0.0014864943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006514052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000102275444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08348561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016974939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005006879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9494996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895603705","doi":"10.14746/eip.2017.1.17","title":"Chinese Adolescents’ Moral Reasoning of Rights Attitudes and Psychological Well-Being","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ETHICS IN PROGRESS","topic":"Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Psychology; Socialization; Perception; Social psychology; Well-being; Psychological well-being; Democracy; Developmental psychology; School climate; Political science; Politics; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.05628178896626877,"score_gpt":0.4081386517897385,"score_spread":0.35185686282346973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895603705","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96976995,0.00055916316,0.00001121205,0.0020243896,0.0013190487,0.0001773339,0.000002477082,0.000026733005,0.026109662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99859047,0.00008616168,0.00057456153,0.00019869195,0.00023096209,0.000010627914,0.000004755219,0.0000096936865,0.00029408117],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871236,0.00011729542,0.00028730795,0.00036878363,0.0002509582,0.00026331912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999319,0.000051809897,0.00017930487,0.0003151128,0.000057184276,0.00007758546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006491178,0.00015812094,0.00023629982,0.00006301995,0.00041824207,0.00007004137,0.000330746,0.0002788588,0.00009386042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008336572,0.000121111225,0.000055751585,0.00006208231,0.00053214695,0.00009153564,0.00012714298,0.0007778761,0.000022242113],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011105855,0.00062832737,0.9166566,0.0001048137,0.00002164639,0.000036816233,0.0028602264,2.723574e-7,0.000006374534,0.07627718,0.00012966714,0.0031670143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009190064,0.00005173075,0.9614347,0.0011204147,0.000004190236,0.000011573274,0.000040595354,0.000004786213,0.000006682063,0.03587933,0.00037784877,0.0001491155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008464321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009275198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044778123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014341008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013876703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49387723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980246174","doi":"10.14746/eip.2019.2.10","title":"Rethinking Digital Games in a Critical and Participatory Perspectives. A Brief Reflection","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ETHICS IN PROGRESS","topic":"Digital Games and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Citizen journalism; Sociology; Participatory culture; Relevance (law); Reflection (computer programming); Critical reflection; Digital society; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Multimedia; Computer science; Media studies; Political science; Pedagogy; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.1262764610157652,"score_gpt":0.4493770606827833,"score_spread":0.3231005996670181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980246174","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85633814,0.0014242404,0.000005435354,0.0084548015,0.00034653096,0.00024984148,0.0000018807139,0.000053266074,0.13312587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982657,0.00012392711,0.0001254121,0.00016475708,0.0000797188,0.000025073612,6.859433e-7,0.000008673098,0.0012060835],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873096,0.00016238398,0.0001527702,0.00026351606,0.0003727541,0.0003176122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999103,0.00060357613,0.000028462226,0.00009472661,0.000080990256,0.00008921558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001579452,0.000072875126,0.00012768323,0.00008264614,0.00005190202,0.00027160614,0.00009393009,0.00022534006,0.000023296547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028501418,0.00007432799,0.000023564244,0.00025003063,0.0008470289,0.0005230909,0.000057389076,0.0007388153,0.0000090247595],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027954567,0.00012281271,0.12712748,0.000050770377,0.0000037589164,0.000026195501,0.519135,8.1895746e-7,0.0000036250876,0.30531758,0.000018580391,0.04816545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017820087,0.00050321803,0.10362642,0.0016921354,0.000013511554,0.000011983198,0.30506638,0.0003402086,0.00007088273,0.378043,0.20794173,0.0009085207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009957043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016405435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21406859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000120886776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022320356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3412092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093243213","doi":"10.14746/eip.2020.1.4","title":"Of Luck Both Epistemic and Moral in Questions of Doping and Non-Doping","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ETHICS IN PROGRESS","topic":"Doping in Sports","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Ambiguity; Subject (documents); Epistemology; Moral disengagement; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.07903163638817917,"score_gpt":0.39110701108729645,"score_spread":0.3120753746991173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093243213","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98279744,0.0011672736,0.000048006117,0.014071429,0.000118228636,0.0002565493,0.0000025410325,0.000017048496,0.0015214648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971514,0.00027712688,0.002409604,0.00009833186,0.00003581623,0.000009215427,7.2098067e-7,0.00000607412,0.000011761218],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900115,0.0001552946,0.00027918353,0.00016773393,0.00024168238,0.00015494101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994692,0.00022195009,0.00012747673,0.00007626769,0.000050958748,0.000054136923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014136045,0.000060503422,0.00018836473,0.00006575624,0.000071330986,0.00002075587,0.00011489607,0.00015483472,0.0000037293942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061959785,0.000066851586,0.000014057895,0.00028000225,0.0008302362,0.000114996685,0.00008063212,0.00042834986,1.7640235e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007017901,0.000018516548,0.867815,0.0003351651,0.0000030049248,0.000008228667,0.068925716,0.000024700475,0.000032101398,0.061726183,0.000006518138,0.0010978117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013276445,0.00020093685,0.9232041,0.005866446,0.000025067073,0.000004633845,0.022689596,0.0021886497,0.0005590755,0.042232987,0.0011683366,0.0005325192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011051605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020754281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055389073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029465424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019187969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.305904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390771206","doi":"10.14746/eip.2023.2.1","title":"Ethical Considerations in Research about Organizations: Compendium of Strategies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ETHICS IN PROGRESS","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Compendium; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Political science; Ethical code; Ethical issues; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.6869107930031262,"score_gpt":0.6264026113333047,"score_spread":0.060508181669821526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390771206","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6517752,0.0012431833,0.0010840804,0.33008084,0.0028242308,0.0011107081,0.00003545233,0.00017247407,0.011673815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99742854,0.00023853296,0.0017216224,0.00023574915,0.00007041644,0.00006899377,0.000017788147,0.000014702064,0.00020365597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930136,0.002345027,0.0010634516,0.00047560557,0.0027110938,0.00039119457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9594406,0.03524224,0.00017808033,0.0006596426,0.004417057,0.00006239919],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.045471326,0.000102536986,0.00026502492,0.0014517303,0.0003593934,0.0004945738,0.0006088678,0.00082710886,0.00033649264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09704779,0.000089607594,0.000026504425,0.008512267,0.0015542872,0.00032112052,0.00027951357,0.0044378224,0.00019849537],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056561917,0.0001009578,0.063344575,0.00005648475,0.0000026772768,0.000014566803,0.026786145,0.0013903838,0.000060063045,0.90550035,0.0023162086,0.00042192315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016968974,0.000020612879,0.15157318,0.00019562873,0.0000010824147,0.000002578958,0.018176043,0.0009448967,0.00024345933,0.8277847,0.0007988494,0.000089269925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025455476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050493074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34565333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006660715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003085867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997859},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400889509","doi":"10.14746/eip.2024.1.7","title":"The COPE / DOAJ / OASPA / WAME Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing: A Critical Analysis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ETHICS IN PROGRESS","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"American Psychiatric Nurses Association; Thompson Rivers University","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Publishing; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.7033057739797399,"score_gpt":0.6590939185420052,"score_spread":0.04421185543773476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400889509","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5213678,0.21514313,0.003776154,0.2335074,0.0016659809,0.000987855,0.00013527482,0.00006388812,0.023352548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919603,0.0052635907,0.002245391,0.00008581147,0.0000328402,0.000036493944,0.0000019724505,0.000009447431,0.00036415114],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9858831,0.0015101114,0.0012274251,0.0008938917,0.00988006,0.0006053975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8921594,0.100930244,0.0001830386,0.000894607,0.0055244463,0.00030827592],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11233641,0.00014070269,0.00036112044,0.03706586,0.0002545171,0.030239068,0.002374911,0.0003822376,0.00006847764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.47006303,0.00008504399,0.00012115496,0.22532862,0.001168594,0.006455798,0.0006390953,0.003238903,0.000019055098],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008502002,0.00071145024,0.47679713,0.00013034868,0.00014540064,0.00029740157,0.007942379,0.00007375696,0.000030559804,0.3168054,0.0004277511,0.19655338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012101982,0.0009902632,0.32164863,0.0007740435,0.000342738,0.000053666292,0.021886077,0.08574428,0.00043807668,0.20552357,0.36046815,0.0009203185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033875523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010073294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47059253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008501628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000670113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117971185","doi":"10.14746/eip.2025.2.4","title":"Reconceptualizing Consumer Responsibility: From Rosters to Philosophy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ETHICS IN PROGRESS","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenon; Conceptual framework; Profiling (computer programming); Philosophical methodology; Business ethics; Conceptual model","score_opus":0.3826333335309561,"score_gpt":0.5160192947639851,"score_spread":0.13338596123302904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117971185","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7024413,0.0024731853,0.0027679282,0.26748616,0.0081894705,0.0007481384,0.00004323447,0.000107674154,0.01574294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825975,0.000052576157,0.0085734585,0.007542568,0.00012999901,0.00008598308,0.00000767692,0.0000125201,0.0009977405],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99555665,0.0011244399,0.0008885853,0.0008824125,0.0012344684,0.0003134418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9809958,0.016626684,0.00016811842,0.001166876,0.0009417006,0.00010087127],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013909924,0.00016634304,0.00031808647,0.0006100051,0.0002648567,0.00041767317,0.0009963221,0.00046666295,0.00019980951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044668887,0.00014364571,0.00006853252,0.0020945168,0.0006133012,0.00027686494,0.00036688405,0.0014062185,0.00021459431],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033600032,0.0002490884,0.49370143,0.00006609501,0.000036074798,0.000016856491,0.053403005,0.00010366753,0.00013158379,0.29844013,0.009910308,0.14360575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026955028,0.000017076518,0.054653533,0.00052375876,0.000007236525,4.6687535e-7,0.0033820528,0.00007300074,0.0007126664,0.89535975,0.04480043,0.00020046654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020413319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00086228666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59691966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013322762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089893595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96337825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}