{"meta":{"query_hash":"bfdae380f3be","filters":{"venue":"ETHICS IN PROGRESS"},"cohort_total":7,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"exported":7,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/bfdae380f3be","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=ETHICS+IN+PROGRESS"},"results":[{"id":"W2257243734","doi":"10.14746/eip.2014.1.2","title":"Antiglobalization and Radical Environmentalism: An Exchange on Ethical Grounds","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ETHICS IN PROGRESS","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Hospital Edmonton; University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Alberta","keywords":"Environmentalism; Globalization; Political radicalism; Ideology; Direct action; Abandonment (legal); Political economy; Politics; Environmental ethics; Political science; Environmental movement; State (computer science); Sociology; Law and economics; Law","score_opus":0.0334918770358803,"score_gpt":0.3115652789350908,"score_spread":0.2780734018992105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257243734","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052778628,0.014565671,0.017845595,0.55946904,0.0029834558,0.000032600903,0.000024342338,0.000051085444,0.35224968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9289262,0.0040139863,0.0032326113,0.039600514,0.002550906,0.00007171273,0.00001443188,0.00008177989,0.021507856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98541105,0.010569174,0.0002587156,0.0007762774,0.0017849962,0.0011999051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903804,0.006743612,0.0007591897,0.0011148782,0.00047299048,0.000529027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014969139,0.00047655858,0.00054936844,0.0009155143,0.005731942,0.010789321,0.00088273035,0.007904142,0.0030393172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008899987,0.00020483964,0.00029468082,0.0011531486,0.054585643,0.010470114,0.009422843,0.010901777,0.00031001348],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054365833,0.0000093568715,0.00012612913,0.000016749913,0.0000017970572,0.000050133924,0.01250406,0.000048365204,0.00006068352,0.9815252,0.0024607256,0.0031914217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011195875,0.000024846478,0.0006210519,0.00017101745,0.000004061445,0.00021424184,0.01708843,0.00025089533,0.0002360851,0.7649112,0.21645203,0.000014931301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00078436837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013395911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014969139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003805378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034816072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07916534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895603705","doi":"10.14746/eip.2017.1.17","title":"Chinese Adolescents’ Moral Reasoning of Rights Attitudes and Psychological Well-Being","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ETHICS IN PROGRESS","topic":"Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Psychology; Socialization; Perception; Social psychology; Well-being; Psychological well-being; Democracy; Developmental psychology; School climate; Political science; Politics; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.05628178896626877,"score_gpt":0.4081386517897385,"score_spread":0.35185686282346973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895603705","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994758,0.000020641144,0.000010333242,0.000021756718,0.0000012759116,0.0000022623242,0.000009045459,2.2485915e-7,0.00045853772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997329,0.000029411995,0.000016123962,0.000012793014,0.000001312692,0.000002563764,0.00001843635,2.4957208e-7,0.00018621192],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99979,0.000041782067,0.000022251172,0.000027451644,0.000059877733,0.000058597252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989918,0.00015132721,0.00045870876,0.000047055102,0.0001491911,0.00020181685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079854723,0.00017392034,0.00012847544,0.00050437875,0.0005849972,0.000682051,0.00014729322,0.00019547832,0.0018637734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015626053,0.00013305258,0.00019645951,0.00035053233,0.0006247748,0.00036375754,0.00039376022,0.00043990984,0.00010959759],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024540177,0.00007095181,0.98597276,0.0000122639285,0.000015295229,0.000106333675,0.008287454,0.000024709967,0.0003841956,0.00024934675,0.00012208412,0.004730024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029711762,0.000030270729,0.9937354,0.0000067619626,0.000008201193,0.00006574706,0.005584488,0.00009065154,0.000076109376,0.00008199406,0.0003147482,0.000002772181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018805861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035653614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018805861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005493276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060459186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037392795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980246174","doi":"10.14746/eip.2019.2.10","title":"Rethinking Digital Games in a Critical and Participatory Perspectives. A Brief Reflection","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ETHICS IN PROGRESS","topic":"Digital Games and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Citizen journalism; Sociology; Participatory culture; Relevance (law); Reflection (computer programming); Critical reflection; Digital society; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Multimedia; Computer science; Media studies; Political science; Pedagogy; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.1262764610157652,"score_gpt":0.4493770606827833,"score_spread":0.3231005996670181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980246174","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3454131,0.034034107,0.094171494,0.26306674,0.01245052,0.002342327,0.00027003582,0.00030256985,0.24794908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9269139,0.010831703,0.014934911,0.011218856,0.0010822471,0.0009753313,0.00006254627,0.0002264333,0.033754155],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9786446,0.017813805,0.00039304685,0.00076475926,0.0012495911,0.0011341436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97990924,0.016399758,0.0006591226,0.0007664145,0.0012462162,0.0010193456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015549361,0.0016665387,0.0006274816,0.002385713,0.0080577405,0.013877666,0.0018830864,0.006246256,0.002377567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022719394,0.00063889846,0.0008114116,0.0014337199,0.03377927,0.016859554,0.013348433,0.010792953,0.00050944876],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004803661,0.00013138636,0.00027643898,0.00032897608,0.000008304537,0.001121002,0.74299175,0.00021990362,0.0016024706,0.22890817,0.00636048,0.01800301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026345606,0.00010340853,0.0005049936,0.00102195,0.000015274709,0.00069062435,0.49748912,0.0005492608,0.0024024223,0.08011222,0.4170372,0.000047169015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002484885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032320542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015549361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075532724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056598173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082233846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093243213","doi":"10.14746/eip.2020.1.4","title":"Of Luck Both Epistemic and Moral in Questions of Doping and Non-Doping","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ETHICS IN PROGRESS","topic":"Doping in Sports","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Ambiguity; Subject (documents); Epistemology; Moral disengagement; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.07903163638817917,"score_gpt":0.39110701108729645,"score_spread":0.3120753746991173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093243213","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08283419,0.006268645,0.041724272,0.20215547,0.001107795,0.000113261995,0.000052649222,0.000048350146,0.6656953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9792367,0.0007610823,0.002918154,0.0069973934,0.0003105242,0.00009311605,0.00001153096,0.000041916726,0.009629555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93720037,0.049311597,0.0011826673,0.0025334384,0.006170204,0.0036015764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9579626,0.034758877,0.0022487978,0.0014136052,0.002092986,0.0015231662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037809867,0.00069574814,0.00083958195,0.0019743906,0.019035542,0.015990715,0.0020602744,0.017262092,0.004468081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044989586,0.0005685439,0.00078396825,0.001658955,0.13934062,0.017887147,0.011817786,0.0113504995,0.0006078861],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000134824295,0.000013545503,0.000304631,0.000038111557,0.0000036618662,0.00020507014,0.031841286,0.00007305582,0.000058517046,0.9643352,0.000846661,0.0022667064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017985503,0.00003410641,0.0005705758,0.00043262693,0.000012164078,0.0006289827,0.051044315,0.0003345993,0.00032524322,0.8571115,0.0894427,0.000045190205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047609443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045227907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037809867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0081071975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008013074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19996005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390771206","doi":"10.14746/eip.2023.2.1","title":"Ethical Considerations in Research about Organizations: Compendium of Strategies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ETHICS IN PROGRESS","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Compendium; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Political science; Ethical code; Ethical issues; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.6869107930031262,"score_gpt":0.6264026113333047,"score_spread":0.060508181669821526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390771206","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002576969,0.04029627,0.2960995,0.60730124,0.009106043,0.0017453922,0.00007439936,0.00027855003,0.042521667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16179511,0.04222513,0.52636164,0.23044972,0.008763065,0.012183017,0.0001489455,0.0005099237,0.0175635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.64179605,0.28478166,0.028001087,0.0071866363,0.03532252,0.0029120368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.46934703,0.4706235,0.011494576,0.014535808,0.029812578,0.004186528],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.34720203,0.0023526945,0.0032454373,0.006004842,0.0133488355,0.03442866,0.0071243495,0.03224763,0.001724831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24495353,0.0023005381,0.002131071,0.003971636,0.09606013,0.02856613,0.01910427,0.046429172,0.0014060804],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012187498,0.000031262927,0.00022282888,0.00097398827,0.000028118138,0.00038111987,0.031751525,0.0004057286,0.00026711964,0.9120485,0.022466524,0.03141114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023903143,0.00005227283,0.00018676682,0.0060267886,0.000033951612,0.00080373266,0.012416183,0.0012695662,0.00056684104,0.6608745,0.31762704,0.00011847881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035202473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005702556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65279794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012452298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036343694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8050161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400889509","doi":"10.14746/eip.2024.1.7","title":"The COPE / DOAJ / OASPA / WAME Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing: A Critical Analysis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ETHICS IN PROGRESS","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"American Psychiatric Nurses Association; Thompson Rivers University","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Publishing; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.7033057739797399,"score_gpt":0.6590939185420052,"score_spread":0.04421185543773476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400889509","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04627652,0.11791152,0.09438285,0.584136,0.015389135,0.00547529,0.00063780363,0.00025871972,0.13553219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68549615,0.06974305,0.15471205,0.060669035,0.007597967,0.007987645,0.00040602215,0.0005676703,0.012820451],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.7398547,0.16593628,0.019521713,0.0053127045,0.064870946,0.0045036143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.35361168,0.552835,0.016889311,0.01039396,0.06297228,0.003297824],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.26471096,0.0009907783,0.0013809017,0.02189127,0.01065886,0.029497053,0.002633339,0.007221122,0.0016032555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.34368995,0.0010289703,0.0016454825,0.012625942,0.053371,0.022578098,0.008499497,0.012871161,0.00038026008],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013468221,0.00006948613,0.0025641161,0.0040760064,0.000094578216,0.0004161628,0.10437985,0.0007643245,0.00037250982,0.76131976,0.050704896,0.0751036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000075137665,0.00016865604,0.005631707,0.021397308,0.00017616204,0.0006681427,0.09056546,0.0017430757,0.0017020771,0.31732628,0.56022567,0.0003203485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008133982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00653959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9927789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03382232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055152204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9067423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117971185","doi":"10.14746/eip.2025.2.4","title":"Reconceptualizing Consumer Responsibility: From Rosters to Philosophy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ETHICS IN PROGRESS","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenon; Conceptual framework; Profiling (computer programming); Philosophical methodology; Business ethics; Conceptual model","score_opus":0.3826333335309561,"score_gpt":0.5160192947639851,"score_spread":0.13338596123302904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117971185","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17052817,0.012167429,0.4052944,0.17846182,0.0022886903,0.00043925398,0.00007916086,0.0001867669,0.23055439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95332694,0.0021568036,0.03469181,0.003986124,0.0002672692,0.00024863193,0.000028958846,0.00008861339,0.005204799],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9776764,0.016478417,0.00062011706,0.0013204905,0.0031467015,0.00075790205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9822666,0.0104951095,0.0019279957,0.0019816165,0.0023665486,0.00096220674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026823698,0.0007512802,0.0006612688,0.004371355,0.0055136387,0.012781088,0.0024217465,0.0037901755,0.0026988252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020336566,0.0005237452,0.0007123109,0.0030279774,0.0720031,0.025606764,0.009993855,0.0074877287,0.00030328377],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010217471,0.00001784872,0.0004987844,0.00005944179,0.000005416938,0.00006384397,0.057080634,0.00022037189,0.0000960321,0.93332446,0.00089402683,0.0077289823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014776725,0.000028610266,0.0006681918,0.00037532297,0.000009481776,0.00015207924,0.078350395,0.0013436764,0.00031428298,0.8566747,0.0620369,0.000031612642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026646242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019835285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026823698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009407633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008844575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.141859},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}