{"meta":{"query_hash":"20795b047c19","filters":{"venue":"EUNOMÍA Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad"},"cohort_total":7,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"exported":7,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/20795b047c19","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=EUNOM%C3%8DA+Revista+en+Cultura+de+la+Legalidad"},"results":[{"id":"W2757225934","doi":"10.20318/eunomia.2017.3804","title":"La incidencia democrática de la nebulosa obligación de claridad del Dictamen relativo a la secesión del Quebec = Democratic Impact of the vague Obligation of Clarity in the Reference re Secession of Quebec","year":2017,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"EUNOMÍA Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Tribunal; Obligation; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023101448022894395,"score_gpt":0.3872741607202332,"score_spread":0.3641727126973388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2757225934","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6847,0.0014780416,0.0016853489,0.011686591,0.000072758696,0.00006901372,0.000427022,0.00002878539,0.29985243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953259,0.00013644769,0.00008912288,0.00021914412,0.00001192775,0.0000075482567,0.000027882286,0.0000029909718,0.0041788863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918893,0.0023539702,0.00018017473,0.00069660775,0.0025193254,0.0023607034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98338103,0.0058484534,0.004063284,0.00095098675,0.0043025347,0.0014538286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006295958,0.0001356317,0.0003046046,0.0012247354,0.005664585,0.006732676,0.00056687056,0.00077642465,0.016408756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019426646,0.00017774869,0.0002731018,0.002021526,0.008721449,0.0018761863,0.0039052295,0.002134824,0.00033695216],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002996251,0.000065931235,0.28101087,0.00023777645,0.00013869656,0.00086168066,0.0788002,0.0025968878,0.00139464,0.54852134,0.013010838,0.073061466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004743899,0.00011035798,0.6659252,0.00046204924,0.00013380125,0.0004143059,0.0925858,0.003200189,0.0012386034,0.03546894,0.20030056,0.00011276751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.65492505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.75119376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34507495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02221728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016859554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69421434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2760343167","doi":"10.20318/eunomia.2017.3803","title":"Del referéndum a la secesión – El proceso quebequense de acceso a la soberanía y las lecciones aprendidas con respecto a la autodeterminación = From referendum to secession – The Québécois process of accession to sovereignty and its teachings with respect to self-determination","year":2017,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"EUNOMÍA Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sovereignty; Independence (probability theory); Politics; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.01388106474947319,"score_gpt":0.34950784098391136,"score_spread":0.33562677623443815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2760343167","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29925668,0.0024148487,0.0029899306,0.014854038,0.00019835039,0.00004311542,0.0000792301,0.000029188908,0.68013465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9437464,0.00066808023,0.00035362178,0.00059105485,0.000019906349,0.000010922447,0.00002138128,0.000011596387,0.054577094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912673,0.0003501778,0.000016829594,0.00009433324,0.0001711928,0.00024078134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991678,0.00019285522,0.000116065305,0.00006623155,0.00024077516,0.00021644658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014613284,0.00016176746,0.00012123214,0.00054652954,0.0064348243,0.0052182837,0.0005426076,0.0008577192,0.0072809528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001541857,0.000121007964,0.000095038515,0.00076759665,0.015535777,0.0015387624,0.0018119825,0.0017096684,0.00035114275],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025685546,0.000023440276,0.008046001,0.0000550391,0.0000053598633,0.00046226883,0.15417601,0.00022078506,0.0006720262,0.7963985,0.007944818,0.03197013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000153412,0.000053383443,0.061584976,0.00054819754,0.000011426288,0.00033182703,0.13271317,0.0006717175,0.0010917931,0.050750222,0.7521715,0.0000564181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.647209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80641204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.352791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016540917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019748388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7097373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133682114","doi":"10.20318/eunomia.2013.2146","title":"La interpretación constructiva en el constitucionalismo commonwealth: ¿activismo o vandalismo judicial?","year":2014,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"EUNOMÍA Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Council for Canadian Studies","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Constructive; Supreme court; Duty; Constitutionalism; Legislation; Focus (optics); Judicial interpretation","score_opus":0.010996729463039218,"score_gpt":0.35743762007417423,"score_spread":0.34644089061113503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133682114","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.109865665,0.0057801954,0.029266382,0.058421668,0.00094824086,0.0000532203,0.00008614798,0.00006888527,0.7955096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98545176,0.000873451,0.0011513977,0.0010573562,0.00026543072,0.000026955651,0.000020155647,0.000030093925,0.011123323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99275255,0.0034092835,0.00018271111,0.000830795,0.0017794368,0.0010451835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948906,0.0031184591,0.0006059196,0.00050308835,0.00067646155,0.00020540485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066237273,0.0003933406,0.00048209226,0.0025772464,0.008932191,0.015841346,0.0017402413,0.003356114,0.0021291128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010284029,0.00030846157,0.0003541813,0.0020986563,0.07828506,0.006966909,0.004327083,0.0055594146,0.000214033],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014906783,0.000002168134,0.00013599926,0.000007641883,8.256264e-7,0.000022567498,0.0077503016,0.000027213135,0.00003919252,0.9901663,0.00048785692,0.0013584404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018059627,0.000020383755,0.0023904876,0.00036455886,0.000023077013,0.0001663849,0.030754084,0.00084418297,0.00054229546,0.7555119,0.20933293,0.00003174712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07528156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07789853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07528156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013918967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0103340475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14968675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7140095246","doi":"10.20318/eunomia.2014.2248","title":"John Stuart Mill: La cuestión negra (1850). Stuart Mill y su réplica a Thomas Carlyle sobre la inferioridad racial","year":2014,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"EUNOMÍA Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; University of Toronto; University of Oxford","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Mill; Theme (computing); Subject (documents); Identity (music)","score_opus":0.00849495227221076,"score_gpt":0.3052429176425764,"score_spread":0.29674796537036563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7140095246","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025946875,0.6386984,0.0007853538,0.17001948,0.013181862,0.000015319025,0.00020066538,0.00003192835,0.17447235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20298421,0.3558821,0.0015982019,0.046038147,0.014970168,0.000088986715,0.00021190781,0.00024686422,0.37797943],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990275,0.0005383387,0.000039806,0.00011920983,0.00019377937,0.000081384336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991033,0.000486725,0.00010033751,0.000056389657,0.00016032543,0.000093052964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017024113,0.0010053004,0.0005869122,0.0017025003,0.005490037,0.004368083,0.00068690686,0.0029906214,0.014887127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034436486,0.00043517817,0.00027795514,0.0021550222,0.007288508,0.007092458,0.0021976149,0.004615967,0.0028195155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041448766,0.000026182375,0.00048260464,0.0001967493,0.000012206421,0.00020842953,0.017386215,0.0000692791,0.000089743044,0.19214095,0.7357836,0.053562667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030807662,0.0000036097276,0.0005249804,0.0004592312,0.0000031582822,0.000079327496,0.0022143296,0.000016158896,0.00006126388,0.013865963,0.9827623,0.000006687601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0289852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07912134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0289852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028742426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016563548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057632983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7140100909","doi":"10.20318/eunomia.2014.2196","title":"El dominio del Derecho. Recíproca rendición de cuentas e imperio de la Ley","year":2014,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"EUNOMÍA Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; University of Oxford; York University","keywords":"General partnership; Government (linguistics); Reciprocal; Rule of law; Core (optical fiber); Ideal (ethics); Ethos; Corporate governance; Public law","score_opus":0.011932477856917471,"score_gpt":0.36044138639304774,"score_spread":0.34850890853613026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7140100909","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048054278,0.006285448,0.010524981,0.023486517,0.0007621093,0.000032511838,0.00012962846,0.00020374506,0.9105208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9062229,0.002115075,0.00176257,0.0010027809,0.00036654624,0.00004309875,0.00006890353,0.0002029412,0.088215284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699485,0.0014304612,0.00006138816,0.0005094263,0.0006622325,0.00034159576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99786013,0.000780989,0.00032239125,0.0005097433,0.00037847375,0.00014831235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002593661,0.00034329836,0.00027244695,0.0015230566,0.004294422,0.0100454,0.00095204025,0.001712713,0.007878973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007548909,0.00026526317,0.0002837102,0.0013699012,0.01813287,0.007074646,0.004693398,0.0025281457,0.0014302145],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022335294,0.000008302886,0.00044451965,0.000028761226,0.000002729864,0.00008000018,0.015117119,0.00010573346,0.00015128801,0.9664233,0.0049966155,0.012619376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014793745,0.000019371233,0.0015230902,0.00020131632,0.0000130595945,0.00019109336,0.017556792,0.00029925784,0.0005389449,0.2070875,0.772529,0.000025647008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01543439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018703293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01543439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005304634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037947223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03848797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7140104593","doi":"10.20318/eunomia.2015.2499","title":"Recensiones: Georgios Varouxakis (2013), Liberty Abroad","year":2015,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"EUNOMÍA Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad","topic":"Contemporary and Historical Greek Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Derogation; Ridiculous; Legislation; Interpretation (philosophy)","score_opus":0.03051243141287549,"score_gpt":0.3289354863850574,"score_spread":0.2984230549721819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7140104593","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006040454,0.86279225,0.00020971918,0.10582432,0.026197648,0.00000526434,0.00010057936,0.000018475283,0.0042477692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018932171,0.8723154,0.00041691167,0.040227253,0.056098927,0.000038890434,0.00013624365,0.000035070505,0.011799122],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993781,0.00021825463,0.00005044538,0.0001766356,0.00013167805,0.00004496866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795604,0.0011900893,0.00022588954,0.000048044825,0.00039407783,0.00018575869],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017720921,0.0007422542,0.0009202478,0.0030139205,0.0013318076,0.0046446384,0.0010927353,0.0033355705,0.011110172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051440457,0.00023011277,0.00030451166,0.004313828,0.0029104413,0.00493343,0.0027075396,0.0033359178,0.003002771],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081384154,0.000041261224,0.0011052901,0.0067249914,0.000056276942,0.0004137881,0.004120747,0.00021102355,0.00022058547,0.062268052,0.78522974,0.13952687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025068011,0.000016747026,0.0015707221,0.0070996946,0.000043638116,0.00042465792,0.0029032421,0.00007683631,0.000091802765,0.015099712,0.97262955,0.000018345676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004676022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059637227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011110172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013703834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004623962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03716719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7140138948","doi":"10.20318/eunomia.2014.2207","title":"Autoridad","year":2014,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"EUNOMÍA Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Chicago; Harvard University; University of Toronto; University of Oxford; Yale University","keywords":"Politics; Autonomy; Point (geometry); Work (physics); Action (physics); Power (physics)","score_opus":0.010773533016650952,"score_gpt":0.33868553265489615,"score_spread":0.3279119996382452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7140138948","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0046572927,0.0029783698,0.0030328957,0.007048342,0.002426703,0.00005641193,0.0013794312,0.0016773122,0.9767432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.056396574,0.0023557614,0.0031213856,0.0022673607,0.00055973255,0.00008113313,0.0015687816,0.0009339862,0.9327153],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998823,0.00021127562,0.000058198177,0.00026548392,0.00047809212,0.00016397501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987752,0.0001957447,0.00009221386,0.0002763656,0.00038480124,0.00027576642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010870534,0.00057427253,0.0004448648,0.0013632593,0.0023459161,0.005214612,0.0011094391,0.0018227717,0.2756774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032534855,0.00026782526,0.00046955672,0.0010448636,0.0014493163,0.0032723167,0.0035813607,0.0021358056,0.11712091],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026319374,0.00009443509,0.0014967402,0.00043338514,0.000015463916,0.00060226495,0.0023249981,0.00024125932,0.0011885102,0.3298503,0.42187017,0.24161918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074621125,0.000010264906,0.0003139287,0.0000660374,0.0000029831529,0.00019251963,0.00019948873,0.00006310552,0.0002314924,0.0051673586,0.9937395,0.0000059442277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042775264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006564159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2756774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018052369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021421707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}